HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr00090_000042_pg277September 27, 1976 Page 9
Councilmember Shelquist suggested that since Mr. Bauer has not gone over
the development contract, and keeping in mind his desire to get started
in a hurry, this matter be tabled until later tonight so he can look it
over.
MSP (Shelquist - Baumgartner) to table this matter until later in the
evening when Mr. Bauer has had a chance to look at the development contract. 5 ayes
STEVE'S APPLIANCES PROPOSED ADDITION TO COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT,
2841 HIGHWAY #10.
MS (Shelquist- Baumgartner) that this matter be sent to the Planning
Commission since it has only been presented to them orally and as a non-
fee item.
Councilmember Shelquist explained that at the September 8 Planning Commission
meeting, the applicant came in with plans without application being taken
out, for review by the Commission. The Commission referred them to the
staff. The request on September 8 was to get approval for an addition,
which was not possible. Also, the matter was not presented to the Planning
Coiiuuission on September 22 as it should have been so there is no recommenda-
tion from the Planning Commission.
Bruce Dahlmeier, of Dahlmeier Construction, stated that they were routed
by the staff to this council meeting. Mr, Rose explained that this
matter came before the Planning Commission and then the applicants came
to him about a week later with plans. The applicants stated they had been
before the Planning Commission and the next step was the Council's approval.
In checking the minutes Mr. Rose had nothing to go on. Administrator Achen
suggested that since they were in a hurry, it be placed on the Council
agenda.
Steve Singer, the applicant, stated that he would have been at the
September 22 meeting if he had known about it. Councilmember Shelquist
stated that the Planning Commission took no action because it was not on
the agenda and there was no fee.
Councilmember Hodges stated that this does not seem like that big of a
problem, but our procedure is to go through the Planning Commission and
this matter should go to them first.
Councilmember Baumgartner stated that he did not understand what the
Planning Commission had to do with this if it is called a "simple
budding expansion ". Councilmember Shelquist stated there needs to be a
variance on the number of parking spaces and the Council has given away
the right to grant a variance. Only the Planning Commission can grant
a variance.
Councilmember Rowley stated she strongly feels the City has to have people
follow the procedures item by item and therefore should go before the Planning
Commission. She stated she sympathizes with the developers because of the
weather problem but this should have started with the Planning Commission.
Attorney Meyers stated that only the Planning Commission can handle a
variance and the development contract has not even been started at this