HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr00090_000042_pg281September 27, 1976 Page 13
dropped completely and consequently loose the momentum by waiting for more
information. He suggested this be tabled until the first meeting in November.
If this goes too far into the fall we lose the capability of installing them.
Mayor Pickar stated the Council probably has more questions now than after
the first meeting concerning tie downs.
MSP ( Pickar- Shelquist) that this matter of amending Chapter 43 of
Ordinance No. 253 entitled Mobile Homes be placed on the November 8
council agenda
Councilmember Baumgartner stated that the State will probably not have their
recommendations available by the November 8 meeting. It may go on until
January or March. Mayor Pickar stated that setting this item for November 8
does not mean it will be settled but we should have more information on it.
Attorney Meyers suggested that someone from the State be invited to this
meeting. 5 ayes
The meeting was then recessed for ten minutes and reconvened at 11:20 p.m.
REVIEW CHAPTER 40.03 SUBDIVISION 4 (4) ENTITLED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS IN
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS.
Mayor Pickar stated that at the last Council meeting when this was discussed
it was sent back to the Planning Commission to find out their feelings.
Four of the Commissioners want it to stay with the 145 square feet, two
want 216 square feet and two want to delete the special use provision and
make it a variance. It does not appear that the majority want it changed.
Councilmember Hodges stated he would like to see the buildings larger so
that boats and such could be inside, but since there were four Commissioners
that wanted to leave it at 145 sq. ft. he would go along with leaving the
ordinance as is and discussing each case.
Councilmember Baumgartner stated that 145 sq. ft. is about 12'x12' and if
you drive around you will see boats and other equipment sitting outside.
He feels the Council should increase the size to 216 square feet and have
anything over 216 sq. ft. require a special use permit.
Councilmember Rowley stated that a 12'x12' building is too small and would
favor the 216 square foot building which would be 12'x18'. A special use
permit should be required for anything larger.
Councilmember Shelquist stated he was surprised at the Planning Commissions'
reaction because he thought they would want the increase. Part of their
discussion was on the assumption that Council had already decided on the 216 sq.
ft. He feels that 145 sq. ft. is an adequate building and if the Council
raises it, it will open the door to more raises. Councilmember Shelquist
reviewed the Peterson and Lestina requests and stated he would like to leave
it at 145 sq. ft. and hear other requests as a special use permit. This
would prevent these buildings from becoming garages and industries in
residential areas, which is a concern of his.