HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr00090_000050_pg111May 14, 1979 Page 5
Roger Baumgartner called the Council's attention to consider the Comprehensive Plan
calling for low density in the area. He also pointed out the possibility of
increased traffic created by the development. Mr. Lundquist replied the density
would be no greater than other properties in the area. Mayor McCarty then asked
Mr. Lundquist if he felt he could build 48 homes on the property as there are 48
apartment units. Mr. Lundquist replied no.
Councilmember Forslund asked Mr. Lundquist to address himself to the increased
traffic, as well as the drainage required. Mr. Lundquist replied the Planning
Commission had no objection to the drainage required. Councilmember Forslund
stated there will be drainage and it should be addressed since it would affect the
surrounding area.
When asked by Mayor McCarty if they had a drainage plan, Mr. Lundquist answered
they did and it has been submitted to the City. He indicated the land slopes
toward the lake and runoff could be directed to the catch basin.
Mayor McCarty indicated that, according to the new Resolution #983, there should
be no more runoff after development than before. He suggested the developer will
have to have some means to retain on site.
Councilmember Hodges indicated it would be foolish to retain when the facility
pipes are already there.
Councilmember Ziebarth pointed out a potential problem with the number of outdoor
parking spaces. He indicated other apartment buildings have had a problem with
residents not wanting to park indoors in the summer.
With a limited number of outdoor spaces, it may result in parking in the streets,
etc. Councilmember Ziebarth questioned if this could be rectified. Mr. Lundquist
indicated they could provide outdoor spaces by changing the design of the garage
to provide outdoor spaces that would be roofed. Another possibility would be to
drop the fee for indoor spaces in summer.
Councilmember Ziebarth stated he did not believe the second alternative would be
a viable solution and suggested the developer address the problem in more detail.
Mr. Lundquist indicated Councilmember Ziebarth's point was well taken and will
provide more parking outdoors.
Councilmember Rowley questioned whether they had written permission to cut for
driveway access. Mr. Lundquist indicated they would use existing ingress and
egress roads. There was no objection, but could obtain written approval if
necessary.
Roger Baumgartner questioned if the development planned to control drainage by
retaining on site, and given this requirement, the area wouldn't allow for more
than one building. Mr. Lundquist replied they can meet requirements and still
provide holding ponds. However, if the storm sewer can be used, it would be
preferrable, and in the City's best interest.
Mr. Thomas Steffens, developer's attorney, indicated the key point is to determine
whether the development is compatible. The developer should not be excluded from
services that other residents are entitled to.