Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting <br />Page 2 February 11, 1980 <br />Acting Mayor Hodges called for the adoption of 5. CONSENT AGENDA <br />the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Forslund asked <br />to have several items removed from the Consent <br />Agenda. These items included Item B, D, F, G, J, <br />and K. Ziebarth then moved the adoption of the <br />remaining items on the Consent Agenda and to <br />dispense with the reading of the resolutions and <br />it was seconded by Rowley. <br />The motion carried. <br />4 ayes <br />0 nays <br />Forslund indicated the reason for the removal <br />of Item B from the Consent Agenda noting that <br />the Planning Commission has wanted additional <br />comments to be made on the Resolution. Item B <br />pertained to Resolution #1062, a Resolution <br />dealing with the proposed alternative for Highway <br />10. Council had general discussion about the <br />Planning Commission comments and decided to lay <br />this matter over until the February 25th meeting, <br />with a review at their Agenda Session of the <br />amended language on the 19th of February. Forslund <br />moved to table Resolution #1062 and that this <br />resolution should be amended to incorporate con- <br />cerns expressed by the Planning Commission. The <br />Council would reconsider the Resolution on Feb. <br />25, 1980. Forslund moved, seconded by Ziebarth. <br />4 ayes <br />The motion carried. 0 nays <br />Forslund indicated her reason for pulling the <br />Hurd Contract was to provide background infor- <br />mation to the public on the purpose of this <br />contract. Nelson explained that the City was <br />using this aerial information for a variety of <br />purposes, including the preparation of the City's <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />6. ITEM B RESOLUTION 1062 <br />CONCERN ON HIGHWAY 10 <br />7. ITEM D <br />HURD AERIAL CONTRACT <br />