Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr00090_000054_pg196MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Page Three July 14, 1980 would be an additional $900 cost for the project. He would be sending the Council a letter the next day explaining the situation and the need for the additional cost. McCarty made a motion, seconded by Rowley to table Item #B until the receipt of the request for change order on the original contract was received from Dan Boxrud. ITEM #B - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION FAILS DUE TO THE AMENDMENT. (MOTION FAILS) Rowley made an amendment to the main motion, seconded by McCarty to approve the $2,200 for the topographical survey from the SDM fund. Ayes -5 Nays -0 ITEM #B - CONSENT AGENDA THE MOTION WAS CARRIED. (MOTION CARRIES) Mayor McCarty informed the Council that Mayor Blomquist has requested support from the suburbs regarding developing a constitutionally valid ordinance that cities can adopt for the control of drug paraphernalia sales. (Memo from Association of Metropolitan Municipalities dated 7- 9 -80). The Council had some discussion about the potential cost of pursuing this ordinance and the level of organization necessary for obtaining this type of commitment from the suburbs. City Attorney Meyers noted that Moundsview currently has a drug paraphernalia ordinance that has been enforced. Acting Clerk- Administrator will bring this item back to the City Council after staff has sent a letter to them indicating moral support for this ordinance (and also a copy of Moundsview's current drug paraphernalia ordinance) but not indicating any financial commitment at this time. 8. LETTER FROM EAGAN MAYOR RE: SALE OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Acting Official Kampel reviewed the Planning Commis- 9. B & E ENTERPRISES - DUPLEX sions decision on this proposal (7- 2 -80). At that DEVELOPMENT time, they had approved the proposal pending compliance with Resolution #983 as well as a definitive statement of separate water and sewer service and a bond set with the City for $1,000 /unit. They sent this recommendation to Council. Ziebarth made a motion, seconded by Hodges, to approve the B & E Enterprise duplex development with the following conditions: 1) a definitive statement of separate water and sewer service to the units, 2) a drainage plan to be in compliance with Resolution #983 which the engineer recommends to be 0.07 acre. ft. of pond capacity, 3) an