HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-23-1996 EDAMOUNDS VIEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SEPTEMBER 23, 1996
TIME: IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING COUNCIL MEETING
MEETING NO. 27
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL - President Linke
Vice President Blanchard
Secretary Trude
Commissioner Quicic
Commissioner Hanlcner
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
EDA ACTION:
Comments:
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
September 9, 1996
EDA ACTION: A
Comments:
5. CONSENT AGENDA
No items on consent agenda.
6. PUBLIC HEARING
No public hearing scheduled for this meeting.
EDA
PAGE TWO
SEPTEMBER 23, 1996
7. EDA BUSINESS
A. Consideration of Resolution No. 96-EDA-53C Authorizing Conveyance of Real
Estate, Staff Report No. EDA-96-59C
EDA ACTION: ATD
8. REPORTS:
Re�ort of EDA Board Members:
1. Report of President Linlce:
2. Report of Vice President Blanchard:
3. Report of Secretary Trude:
4. Report of Commissioners:
a. Commissioner Quicic:
b. Commissioner Hanlcner:
5. Report of Executive Director:
6. Report of Treasurer:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
� ��T � � • ' �t � �({A.' � II�
'`_.... � t � � � � • � �_-.i� l� : L7
PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW
�CONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Meeting No. 26
September 9, 1996
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View MN 55112
***�WW*******%k****#*%�**��&***�***#**�&�#****�*�&#**%k**��*�****��****#��*****#****%k*
CALL TO ORDER
The Economic Development Authority was called to order by President Linke on September 9, 1996 at
9:05 p.m.
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: President, Jerry Linlce; Vice Pi•esident Phyllis Blanchard, Secretaiy, Julie Trude;
Commissioner Gary Quicl<, Commissioner Sue Hanirner, Executive Director Cathy Bennett, Clerlc
Administrator Chuck Whiting, and City Attorney Bob Long.
OTHERS PRESENT: None
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
It was asked that one item be added to the Agenda under EDA Business, 7(D) Authorization for City
Attorney to prepare a Resolution and a Quit Claim Deed for the Bel-Rae property.
MOTION/SECOND: T►vde/Blanchard to approve the EDA Agenda as Amended.
VOTE: 5 ayes
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
June 24, 1996 -
0 nays Motion Carried
Ms. Blanchard noted some corrections to the minutes for the June 24, 1996 meeting. Page 2, Lines 6 and
10, and Page 3, Line 2 should be corrected to read "8265 Spring Lake Road", rather than Silver Lalce Road.
MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Trude to approve the June 24, 1996 minutes, AS AMENDED.
VOTE:
August 12, 1996-
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Linke to approve the minutes of the August 12, 1996 meeting as presented in
writing.
VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
CONSGNT AGENDA:
There were no items placed on the Consent Agenda for this meeting.
� ' / 1� � � �� ;`V fj I'�
� o:.,.., ,
, `�� � � � � �..� � �� � �� �
ti � ,�_.
EDA Meeting #26
August 12, 1996
Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
PUBLIC HEARTNGS:
There were no Public Hearings scheduled for this meeting.
EDA BUSINESS:
A. Consideration of Authorizing Wetland Delineation Study for Highway 10 Redevelopment Area
Section 7.
Ms. Bennett explained that Pam Sheldon and hei•self inet with developers who have indicated an interest in
development of property directly across Highway ] 0 fi•om City Hall. It is her feeling that development of
this property would have a major impact on the future direction of the redevelopment of Highway 10. She
noted that the property does have a large wetland and she has discussed the impact of the wetland on the
possibility of development with Rocky Keehn of SEH. The wetland a►•ea is based on the National Wetland
Inventory Maps and not a site delineation. Mr. ICeehn has suggested that the wetland be delineated so that
the city will 1<now how much of the property can actually be developed. Additionally, once a delineation
is made, the city can review how a development will impact the city's Local Water Management Plan.
Ms. Bennett suggested that the city pursue delineation of the property to assist in the future development
marlcet for the properiy. The proposed cost is estimated to be $1,500, which would be funded through
existing tax increment administrative revenues.
MOTION/SECOND: Hankner/Blanchard to Authorize SEH to Perform a Wetland Delineation Study for
Highway 10 Redevelopment Area Section 7, to be funded through existing tax increment administrative
revenues.
VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
B. Consideration of Resolution No. 96-�DA-51, Authorizing the Economic Development Commission
to Worlc on a Request for Proposal and Solicit Bids for the Development of a Vision and Schematic
Plan for Highway 10 Redevelopment Area Section 9.
Ms. Bennett noted that in Apt•il tlie Economic Development Authority looked at different development
sections along Highway 10 and identiiied three priority areas. Section 9 is located from County Road I to
Silver Lake Road.
Ms. Bennett stated she had met with the Economic Development Commission to strategize how to proceed
with the development of Section 9. At that meeting, they discussed whether the city should continue spot
development or if they should be loolcing at the entire section for coordinated development. The
Economic Development Commission would lilce direction from the EDA to proceed with requests for
proposals for this section of Highway 10 and to develop a vision and schematic plan on what could be
developed in that area. Ms. Bennett proceeded to outline the process schedule if the EDA authorizes the
EDC to proceed as requested.
Ms. Blancllard noted that several plans have been worked out on Highway 10 projects in previous years.
She wondered if it was feasible to complete another study at this time.
EDA Meeting #26
August 12, 1996
Page 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
g
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
�kk � � .N � ��" ,�' �� � " � � :�� �~9 '�
� �J k , ,� . �
�_ � � �.� f 3�F>> il� �.�:�r� ��,._;}� ��1'�' r�_�_� ��:_ � -
Ms. Bennett explained that the previous studies did not provide infoi-mation as to what could actually be
developed in that area. This study would be more in-depth and provide uses that would be possible for the
area based on access to the site, flow of traffic, designs, etc.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Hanlrner to Approve Resolution No. 96-EDA-51, Authorizing the Economic
Development Commission to Work on a Request for Proposal and Solicit Bids for the Development of a
Vision and Schematic Plan for Highway 10 Redevelopment Area, Section 9.
VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
C. Consideration of Resolution No. 96-EDA-52, Accepting Demolition Bid for the removal of House
Located at 8265 Spring Lalce Road.
Ms. Bennett explained that the city sent out eight specification packets to contractors for the demolition of
property located at 8265 Spring Lake Road. They received demolition agreements from three contractors,
the lowest of which was received fi•om Herbst & Sons in the amount of $6,300. Specifications state that
the wbrlc must be completed by September 20, 1996. After demolition is complete, staff will begin
soliciting interest in the property from developers with hopes to sell the land to a developer by the end of
October 1996.
MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Trude to Approve Resolution No. 96-EDA-52, Accepting Demolition Bid
for the Removal of House Located at 8265 Spring Lake Road.
VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
D. Authorization for the City Attorney to Prepare a Resolution and Quit Claim Deed from the
Economic Development Authority to the Mounds View City Council for the Bel-Rae Property.
Mr. Long, City Attorney, noted that a Public Notice is not requried to be published when a property is
conveyed fi•om one political subdivision to another, as in this case.
MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Blanchard to authorize the City Attorney to prepare a Resolution and Quit
Claim Deed from the Economic Development Authority to the Mounds View City Council for the Bel-
Rae property.
V OTE
R�PORTS:
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Iteport of EDA Board Members:
Repo►-t of President Linke: No report.
Report of Vice President Blanchard: No report.
Report of Secretary Trude: No report.
EDA Meeting #26
August 12, 1996
Page 4
� � r-�1 f \ i—J:. ��,� n r._: .-
�' ` � '� �I 1/ I ��I � 1� `�_
\\ .� �1 � 1� J _ :I i: �
1
�l- � �� �,. ��,' ��,, � �� �� ��� � ��� ��,:1 �! 1
.__ �� �_ ,
-. :
1 Report of Commissioners:
2
3 Commissioner Quicic No report.
4
5 Commissioner Hanlrner: No report.
6
7 Re�ort of Executive Director: Ms. Bennett noted that Septetnber 23, 1996 is not a regularly schedule
8 date for an EDA meeting. Therefore, she will see that proper notices are posted in regard to this meeting.
9
10 Report of Treasurer: No report.
11
12 President Linlce adjourned the meeting at 9:28 p.m.
13
14 Respectfully submitted,
15
lb
17
1 g Tamara D. Saeflce
19 Recording Secretary
20
21
22
23
. : __—_. : ' t
tr����7 ��)G�
()�U)(�C��
A
� ��i���iV
�A
r�S'iPSS' PafltlCCS����S
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REQUEST FOR EDA CONSID�RATION
STAFF REPORT
EDA MEETING DATE
September 23, 1996
Item Description: Consideration of Authorizing Conveyance of Real Property
Executive Director's Review/Recommendation:
-No Comments to supplement this i•epoi•t
-Comments attached.
Explanataon/Sunzmary (attach supplen�ent .sheets as necessary)
Su�nmary:
Agenda Section 7A
Report Number:EDA96-59c
Repoi-t Date: 9/18/96
Special Order of Bus.
Consent Agenda
Public Heariiigs
X EDA Business
Attorney Bob Long has prepared a resolution that would authorize the EDA to convey the Bel-Rae property
to the City of Mounds View through a quit claim deed at a price of $1.00.
It was recommended to deed the property to the City since the management and adminstration of recreation
programs is the responsibility of the City staf£ If the �DA continued to own the property and authorized the
City to be its leasing agent, there is the possiblity of double liability exposure. Even though the Council
members serve as the EDA Coinmissioners, the two entities are seperate political bodies under the MN State
Statues and therefore a potential suit could be filed under both bodies. With one entity owning and
manageing the property, legal action in regards activities at the Bel-Rae could only be served to one, the City.
If it is decided that redevelopment of the Bel-Rae will include the use and financing structure of tax
increment funds, the City can easily quit claim deed the property bacic to the �DA.
Executive Director
RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No. 96-EDA53, Authorizing the Conveyance of Real Property
to the City of Mounds View
RESOLUTION NO. 96-EDA-53
MOUNDS VIEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MTNNESOTA
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF REAL PROPERTY
WIIEREAS, the Mounds View Economic Development Authority, Mounds View,
Minnesota ("Authority") is a public body corporate and politic organized and operating under
Minnesota law, as amended, and is authorized to sell real estate in the manner provided by law;
and
WHEREAS, the Authority finds it desirable to sell the real estate described in �Yhibit A
attached hereto known as the Bel-Rae Ballroom site ("Subject Property") for the purpose of
promoting the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota
("City"); and
WHEREAS, the City has offered to purchase the Subject Property from the Authority for
the sum of $1.00 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.64.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Commissioners of the Mounds View
Economic Development Authority, as follows:
The Commissioners hereby find that the sale of the Subject Property to be
suitable, necessary and reasonable and for a public purpose to serve the needs of
the citizens and property owners of the City.
2. Authority staff are hereby authorized and directed to take all necessary steps to
convey the Subject Properly to the City for $1.00 by quitclaim deed, including,
without limitation, the pzeparation and execution of all appropriate documents.
Adopted by the Nlounds View Economic Development Authority, Mounds View,
Minnesota this 23rd day of September, 1996.
Jerry Linke, President
ATTEST:
Catherine Bennett, Executive Director
EXHIBIT A
TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-EDA-53
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
Lots nineteen (19), twenty (20), twenty-one (21) and twenty-two (22), and that part of Lot
sixteen (16) lying north of a line drawn between the southeasterly corner of Lot nineteen (19) and
the southwesterly corner of Lot four (4), except the East sixty-six (E.66) feet of said Lot sixteen
(16), all in Block five (5), Pinewood Terrace No. 2, according to the plat thereof filed of record
in the office of the Registrar of Titles within and for Ramsey County.
Together with all easements appurtenant thereto, all gaps, overlays, and gores contained therein,
and all streets and alleys, vacated or to be vacated, which may accrue thereto upon vacation.
SEP 17 '96 16�45 KENNEDY & GRAVEN P.6
Pam No. 3an� - Qvrr ei�r DP.RU MIIlIIe7f9ti UOIFOfID COO
veYmaei Bl�cs �197�
w[puraaoa oc Patmea�ip
W Corporetioa cr P�emctaqip
No delinquent taxss and transfer entered; Certificate
af Real Estate Value ( ) f�led ( ) not required
Cerkificate of R$a! Estate V'alue No.
l9
Coeu►ty Auditor
by
Depury
STA?E D�D TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date: , 1996
(reserved for recording data}
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDFR.A?IQN, Mownds View Economic .Development Authorit,y, a public body corporate and
politic under the laws of Minnesota, Grantor, hereby conveys ar�d quitclairns to tha City of Mounds Vie�v, Gran�ee(s), a
municipality org,anized undec the la�uvs of Minnesota, real property in Ramsay Couary, Minnesota, dexribed as follows:
Lots nineteen (19), twenty (20), twcnty-one (21} and twenty-two (22), and that part of Lot sixteon (16) l�ing north of a
line drawn betvveen tho southeasterly corner of Lot ninatean (19) and the southwesterly corner of Lot four (4), except the
East sixty-six (E. 66} feet of said Lot sixteea (1b), all in Block five (5), Pirtewood Tecrace No. 2, according to the plat
thereof Sled of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles within and for Ramsey County.
Together with al] easements appurtenatxt theseto, all gaps, overlaps, and gores coatained therein, and alI streets and alleys,
vacated or to be vacated, which may acerue thereto upon vacation.
(if more space is needed, cqadnue on baele)
Tha Graator certifies that the Crrantor does not know of any we11s on the described reai properiy.
MOUNDS VIEW ECQNOMiC DE'V�L4PMENT AUTHOR�'.C1'
Aff"ix Deed Tax Sramp Here
By
its �
By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss.
CDUNTY OF
Tha foregoing was acknowledged bafore me this day of 1996 , b�+
and � , the
�d of
1�i0UNDS V�W ECO�iOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, on behalf of th� Authority.
NOTARIAI. STAMP ak S�AI. (OR OT1�R I7Ti.B OR
SIGNATURE OF PF.RSON TAKiNCr ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Tax Statemenis �or the real property describcd in thi.s instrvment shouid
ba seat tn (include name and address of Grsntte);
I�iIS INSTRUM&N? WAS t�RAFTED BY (r�A� qNP
Kennedy & Grar�en, Charter+ed
47p Pil�sbury Center
200 South Sixth Street
Minaeapolis, Minnesota 55402
(612) 33?'-9300
DJGSI.oQ83
M0205-1
240! Highway 10._ .
Mounds Vicw, MN SSl 1i-1499
, -_ _
MEMORANDUM
To: Mounds View City Council
From: Cathy Bennett, Economic Development Coordinator �
Subject: Addition to EDA Agenda
Date: September 23, 1996
Since the EDA pacicet was completed prior to the Council pacicet, I would request that an item be
added to the agenda to address the purchase of tax forfeiture lands with tax increment funds.
The information regarding the property will be presented as item 11 G under council business.
The staff recoirunendation is for Council to recommend the EDA purchase the properties as part
of the housing replacement program.
I have attached resolution no. 96-EDA54 which would approve and authorize the purchase of
both properties for an amount not to exceed $45,000 using tax increment funds.
cc: Chucic Whiting
1_""" . __ .' �.=C""'. . .. . .
RESOLUTION NO. 96-EDA54
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF NDNNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUT'HORIZING THE ACQUTSTI'ION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY FOR REDEVELOPN�NT PURPOSES
It is hereby resolved by the Board of Cammissioners (the Board) of the Mounds View
Economic Development Authority (the Authority) as follows:
1. RECTTALS:
(a) the Authority has the powers provided in Minnesota, Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.124
and 469.090 to 469.108 (collectively the Act).
(b) Pursuant to and in furtherance of the objectives of the Act, the Authority has undertaken a
program to promote development and redevelopment of certain land within the City of
Mounds View and in this connection is engaged in carrying out the Mounds View Economic
Development Project (the Project) within the City.
(c) There has been approved pursuant to the Act of Project Plan for the Project.
(d) The redevelopment and dPvelopment of properry are stated objectives of the Project Plan.
(e) The Authority desires to acquire two tax forfeited lands located in the City on County
Road H2 identified by parcel numbers 07-30-23-32-0016 and 07-30-23-32-0004 for a total
amount not to exceed $45,000.
2. The Board hereby determines that the purchase of the tax forfeited lands would be in
furtherance of the Project Plan and hereby approves and authorizes said actions.
3. The Board hereby determines that the acquisition of the two tax forfeited lands will help
realize the public purposes of the Act and is in furtherance of the Project Plan.
ATTEST:
Adopted this 23 day of September, 1996.
President
�
(SEAL)
�� E u 've Director