HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2525
.
.
.
~J t~
RESOLUTION NO. 2525
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING A WETLANDS ALTERATION PERMIT FOR
MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK SOUTH WETLAND ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
PLANNING CASE NO. 259-89
WHEREAS, Everest Development has requested approval of a
wetlands alteration permit to allow enhancement work in the
wetland to be done which includes the construction of a trail
system around the wetland; and
WHEREAS, the wetland enhancement and trail system is
located on the Mounds View School District property; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View School District Board approved of
the proposed wetland enhancement project on their property; and
WHEREAS, the improvements are shown as the Wetland
Enhancement Plan (no date) and made part of the development
agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council have
reviewed the land use proposed and recognizes it is appropriate
given the site zoning and use and is in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Developer, Everest Development, has requested
approval of a wetland alteration permit to carry out grading work
associated with the development proposal for the wetlands
enhancement and the trail system; and
WHEREAS, a wetland alteration permit is required as a
result of the work proposed within the wetland; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, Planning Commission, City Staff
and the City's Engineering Consultant have reviewed this
development request; and
WHEREAS, this development must conform to the requirements
of Chapters 48 and 49A because this development is in a wetland
zoning district; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has seen fit to develop these
requirements to regulate the wetland because the Council found
the following:
Chapter 48.01, Subd. 2
The Council finds that wetlands within the City, as part
of the ecosystem, are critical to the present and future
health, safety and general welfare of the land, animals,
. .
,
RESOLUTION NO. 2525
PAGE TWO
.
and people within the City, as well as within the Rice
Creek Watershed District: that existing and potential
development within the City and Rice Creek Watershed
District poses increasing ecological and economic problems
and demands, having the effect of potentially despoiling,
polluting, accelerating the aging, eliminating or
negatively and irretrievably altering both the wetlands
and their functions (and the processes associated
therewith) which, if conserved and maintained, constitute
important physical, educational, ecological, aesthetic,
recreational, and economic assets for existing and future
residents of the community and the Rice Creek Watershed
District: and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found the intent of Chapter
48 to be the following:
Chapter 48.01, Subd. 2A
.
To preserve wetlands in as natural a state as possible to
serve as natural retention and detention areas for surface
waters: to regulate the use of areas adjacent to the
wetlands in order to protect the natural function of the
wetlands: to provide for the protection, preservation,
proper maintenance and use of wetland zoning districts: to
minimize the disturbance to them and to prevent damage
from excessive sedimentation, eutrophication, or
pollution: to prevent loss of beneficial aquatic
organisms, wildlife, and vegetation of the habitats of the
same: to provide for the protection of fresh water
supplies from the danger of drought, overdraft, pollution,
or mismanagement: to secure safety from floods: to reduce
the financial burdens imposed upon the community through
rescue and relief efforts occasioned by the occupancy or
use of areas subject to periodic flooding: to prevent loss
of life, property damage, and the losses and risks
associated with flood conditions: to reduce the financial
burdens imposed upon the community through correction of
erosion problems that, with proper foresight, could be
avoided: to avoid the financial burden of the need for the
community to reclaim its water quality: and to preserve
the location, character and extent of natural drainage
courses: and
WHEREAS, in the granting of a wetland alteration
permit, the City Council must find each of the following in
Section 40.26, Subd. D, to be true:
.
(1) Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to
the properties which do not apply generally to other
properties in the same zone or vicinity and result
from lot size or shape, topography or other
circumstances over which the owners of the property,
since enactment of this Code, have no control.
.
.
.
, ,.,. ~~ '.., ~
RESOLUTION NO. 2525
PAGE THREE
(2) The literal interpretation of the provisions of this
Code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly
enjoyed by other properties in the same district under
the terms of this Code.
(3) That the special conditions or circumstances do not
result from the actions of the applicant.
(4) That granting the wetland alteration permit requested
will not confer on the applicant any special privilege
that is denied by this Code to owners of other lands,
structures or buildings in the same district.
(5) That the wetland alteration permit requested is the
minimum request which would alleviate the hardship.
Economic conditions alone shall not be considered a
hardship.
(6) The wetland alteration permit would not be materially
detrimental to the purpose of this Code, or to other
( 7 )
The requested wetland alteration permit will not
impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property, or substantially increase the congestion of
the public streets, or increase the danger of fire or
endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish
or impair property values within the neighborhood.
The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may impose such
restrictions an~nditions upon the premises
benefitted by a~variance as may be necessary to comply
with the standards established by this Code, or to
reduce or minimize the effect of such variance upon
other properties ln the neighborhood, and to better
carry out the intent of the wetland alteration permit;
and
x
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this property does
have exceptional circumstances which apply to this property and
which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone
or vicinity; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the special
conditions do not result from the actions of the applicant; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds the wetland alteration
permit request is the minimum wetland alteration permit which
would alleviate the hardship; and
WHEREAS, the City's Consulting Engineers have reviewed the
wetland alteration permit application and evaluated it based on
Chapter 48.06, Subdivision 3; and
. '.
.. "..-'
.
.
.
i. '
, .
RESOLUTION NO. 2525
PAGE FOUR
WHEREAS, it has been determined that organic waste will
not be discharged directly into the wetland: and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposed
development will not cause the total natural phosphorus stripping
capacity of the wetland to fall below the projected phosphorus
production from the whole developed wetland watershed: and
WHEREAS, construction activities associated with the
Business Park reportedly will impact 0.006 acres of the wetland:
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council have
reviewed the location and extent of the wetland area proposed:
and
WHEREAS, the results from Barr Engineering's review of the
development proposal indicates that the development proposal is
in compliance with the permit requirements: and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council have
received a positive review from the Environmental Quality Task
Force for the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View approves the wetlands alteration permit
for the wetlands enhancement project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council approves the
wetland alteration permit to allow for working within a wetland
zoning district contingent upon the following:
1) The Developer submit a plan illustrating the
boundaries of the work areas and that these boundaries
be the minimum necessary to complete the proposed
work.
2) The limits of construction shall be specified and
staked in the wetland zoning district.
3) A specific construction schedule shall be provided.
Adopted this 28th day of August, 1989.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)