Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 2014/07/28PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting July 28, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 County Road 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 7:00 P.M. 1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL: Flaherty, Gunn, Hull, Meehlhause, Mueller NOT PRESENT: None. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A. Monday, July 28, 2014, City Council Agenda. MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Meehlhause. To Approve the Monday, July 28, 2014, agenda as presented. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 5. PUBLIC INPUT None. 6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS A. Presentation from Carol Jackson, Manager of the Mounds View Branch Ramsey County Library Carol Jackson, Mounds View Library Branch Manager, provided the Council with an update on the libraries activities as part of the Ramsey County Library system. She reviewed the mission and vision statement for the library, along with its initiatives. She discussed how e-readers were changing book circulation within the library, and noted there was a strong push for early literacy. The number of library visits for 2013 and 2014 were reviewed, along with the programs offered to both adults and children. She explained the renovations that were completed in August 2013 and encouraged the public to stop in for a visit. Council Member Meehlhause was pleased with the programs and literature available at the Mounds View Library. Mounds View City Council July 28, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 2 Mayor Flaherty thanked Ms. Jackson for her report and for her dedication to this important public asset. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. 7:00 p.m. Public Hearing, Resolution 8283, Approving a Development Review & Developer’s Agreement for new construction on vacant land on County Road 10, west of Woodale Drive; Developer: Build to Suit, Inc. for BioLife Plasma Services. Planning Associate Heller stated that BioLife Plasma Services has been located in Mounds View for several years and is currently leasing space at 2222 Woodale Drive, in the Mounds View Business Park. She reported BioLife now wants their own building and have a purchase agreement to buy the vacant land on the east side of the Mounds View Motors car dealership on County Road 10. Multi-Tech is the owner of the vacant land. Build to Suit, Inc. is the developer for this site and is requesting a development review for a new 16,692 square foot building to be built on the south side of the site, fronting County Road 10. Planning Associate Heller explained that BioLife will be creating two lots from the land they are purchasing and will sell the north lot in the future. A major subdivision application will be submitted in the coming weeks. A new building will allow the company to continue its success in Mounds View and the north metro. She estimated that construction would take seven to nine months. She anticipated that BioLife would move their existing sign to the new location. She discussed the landscaping and grading plan. Staff reviewed the plans in detail with the Council and explained the Planning Commission recommended approval of Resolution 1011-14, which approves the plans submitted by Build to Suit, Inc. for a new 16,692 square foot building for a BioLife Plasma Services facility at their July 16, 2014 meeting. Mayor Flaherty opened the public hearing at 7:28 p.m. Beth Johnson, 2287 County Road H2, expressed concern with the water runoff and grading of the site. She discussed the flooding that currently occurred on her property. She recommended that permeable surfaces be considered. She requested clarification on where the building and access drive would be placed on the site. Planning Associate Heller reviewed the location of the building and proposed access road. Jason Harder, Build to Suit, discussed the stormwater management plan noting the water from this site tended to flow towards Highway 10. He noted his grading plan would keep the water flowing in this direction towards the drainage pond. He explained that no water would flow north towards the adjacent homes. Jim Lyons, 2279 County Road H2, discussed the water issues he had on his property. Hearing no further public input, Mayor Flaherty closed the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. Mounds View City Council July 28, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 3 Council Member Hull asked if access was granted to County Highway 10 if the access point on H2 could be closed. Planning Associate Heller stated this was a possibility, but would be determined by the developer. She further discussed the issues the City was having with the County regarding an access point onto County Highway 10. Mayor Flaherty suggested staff speak with Ramsey County Commissioner McGuire regarding the access matter. He asked if the new building would comply with the County Road 10 Overlay District. Planning Associate Heller explained that this building would not comply due to the fact the Ordinance would not go into effect until September 9th. She reported the building would follow the guidelines; however, the building setbacks would not. MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Meehlhause. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 8283, Approving a Development Review & Developer’s Agreement for new construction on vacant land on County Road 10, west of Woodale Drive; Developer: Build to Suit, Inc. for BioLife Plasma Services. Council Member Mueller asked if the applicant had received Rice Creek Watershed approval. Planning Associate Heller explained this item would be reviewed by the Rice Creek Watershed at the end of the month. Council Member Mueller explained the new facility would bring 40 new jobs to the City of Mounds View. Council Member Meehlhause was pleased that BioLife had chosen to stay in Mounds View. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. B. 7:00 p.m. Public Hearing, Second Reading & Adoption of Ordinance 888, Amending Title 1100 by Adding Chapter 1128, County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District (Roll Call Vote). Planning Associate Heller explained that the City has been discussing the creation of a Corridor Overlay District along County Road 10 in order to give more flexibility to new development projects on the corridor. The City is willing to be flexible on requirements such as setbacks, parking, density and height, but the City also wants projects that are high quality. Planning Associate Heller reviewed Chapter 1128 in the City Code with the Council noting it was created for this overlay district instead of inserting the new language into an existing chapter. She explained the section regarding the City having the option to not require a development area to comply with the overlay district was removed because in 1128.05 the zoning districts that would be applicable are listed. It was noted staff added zoning districts R-3 and R-4 to the listed zoning districts. Staff recommended the Council waive the Second Reading and adopt the Ordinance amending Title 1100 by adding Chapter 1128 which would create a County Road 10 Overlay District. Mounds View City Council July 28, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 4 Mayor Flaherty opened the public hearing at 7:51 p.m. Hearing no public input, Mayor Flaherty closed the public hearing at 7:51 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Waive the Second Reading & Adopt Ordinance 888, Amending Title 1100 by Adding Chapter 1128, County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District and publish an Ordinance summary. Council Member Meehlhause thanked staff and the Planning Commission for their work on this Ordinance. ROLL CALL: Gunn/Hull/Meehlhause/Mueller/Flaherty. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. C. Resolution 8275, Approving a Developer’s Agreement for Longview Estates. Planning Associate Heller requested the Council consider approval of a Developer’s Agreement for Longview Estates. She explained the property was being developed by Marty Harstad and work has already begun on the lot. She reported the final plat was being reviewed by the County. She noted the deadfall would be removed once the ground hardens to ensure that the wetlands are not damaged. Staff reviewed the Developer’s Agreement, noting several language changes and recommended approval. City Attorney Riggs explained he had reviewed the Developer’s Agreement and supported the language modifications. Council Member Mueller asked if the Developer’s Agreement included a requirement that the streets would be restored to their present condition after all construction was complete. Public Works Director DeBar indicated Item 203(C) would address the inspection and restoration of City streets. He noted the developer would have a $75,000 bond in place to cover the expense of any necessary street restoration. Council Member Meehlhause asked if Outlot A would be given to the City. Planning Associate Heller stated this was the case noting Outlot A would be dedicated to the City on the plat. MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Mueller. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 8275, Approving a Developer’s Agreement for Longview Estates. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. D. Resolution 8284, Consideration of an Appeal for a Variance Denial for a Second Curb Cut at 7800 Groveland Road. Planning Associate Heller explained the Planning Commission discussed a variance request for a Mounds View City Council July 28, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 5 second curb cut for the property at 7800 Groveland Road at their May 21st and June 4th meetings. She explained that the applicants had constructed a second garage and was requesting a second curb cut, when City Code allows for only one. She reported the Planning Commission had a 3-3 vote at their May 21st meeting and recommended denial of the request 6-1 at their June 4th meeting. Staff explained the applicant has since appealed. Frands Jensen, 7800 Groveland Road, explained he had several neighbors present on his behalf to speak in support of the second curb cut. Jim Boyle, 2840 Oakwood Drive, supported the second curb cut request for the Jensens. He did not believe the second curb cut was a public safety concern. He recommended the Council approve the access point onto Oakwood Drive. Leroy Tower, 2829 Oakwood Drive, believed it was more of an issue to not allow the curb cut. He explained the existing curb would be damaged given the location of the Jensen’s new garage. He recommended the Council support the second curb cut. Mr. Jensen explained that when he bought the property he was told he could apply for a variance to allow the second curb cut. He reported he would have never purchased the property if he knew it would be voted down. He discussed the other properties in the City with two curb cuts. He requested the Council reconsider the matter and allow him to have the second curb cut. Council Member Meehlhause asked if the garage could have been constructed in such a manner to allow for access from the main driveway. Mr. Jensen stated there were four trees that would have had to have been removed in order to allow for access from the main driveway. Council Member Meehlhause questioned why the Jensen’s did not apply for the variance prior to building the garage. Mr. Jensen believed that the variance would be approved given the location of his property. Council Member Hull inquired if staff could have denied the building permit for the second garage. Planning Associate Heller explained the garage plans met City requirements. She reported that she made Mr. Jensen aware that a second curb cut was not allowed under City Code. Council Member Hull asked if a second garage with no driveway would hurt a homeowners’ property value. Planning Associate Heller did not believe the property value would decrease because the second garage did not have a driveway. She commented that the actual sale of the property may prove to be more of a concern. Council Member Gunn explained that the properties with second curb cuts were grandfathered in. She reported that many second curb cuts have been removed through the Street Improvement Project. Mayor Flaherty questioned if anyone spoke for or against the second curb cut at the Planning Mounds View City Council July 28, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 6 Commission meetings. Planning Associate Heller reported only the applicant spoke regarding this case. Mayor Flaherty believed that the public support would have been helpful at the Planning Commission meeting. He feared that this case could set precedence if the denial were overturned. He expressed concern about the order in which the applicant pursued the garage building permit and variance. Mr. Jensen stated he had the understanding that the variance request would be approved given the location of his home. He explained he would not have built the garage had he known the curb cut would not be approved. Mayor Flaherty discussed the reasons the City Council had moved away from allowing second curb cuts. MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 8284, Over Turning the Planning Commission’s Denial of a Variance for a Second Curb Cut at 7800 Groveland Road. Council Member Hull supported the second curb cut due to the fact Mr. Jensen did not live on a busy street. In addition, he did not want the property value to be harmed given the fact there was a garage in the rear yard without a driveway. He appreciated the work conducted on this case conducted by staff and the Planning Commission. Council Member Mueller appreciated the work of the Planning Commission as well and understood that Mr. Jensen did not approach this matter in the correct order. However, she supported the second curb cut given the fact it would reduce the wear and tear on the City curb and would improve the traffic flow in the neighborhood. Council Member Gunn agreed. She reiterated the fact that Mr. Jensen would be responsible for installing a hard surface driveway and curb cut within one year. She commented that this would be at Mr. Jensen’s expense and would have to be approved by the City. Mr. Jensen understood these requirements. Council Member Meehlhause stated he would not be supporting this request. He believed that the variance request should have been made prior to the construction of the garage. He did not want to see the Council setting a precedence by approving this variance request. Mayor Flaherty reported Mr. Jensen created a precarious situation for the City Council. He appreciated the support provided by his neighbors and noted he was in favor of the second curb cut. Ayes – 4 Nays – 1 (Meehlhause) Motion carried. Mounds View City Council July 28, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 7 E. Resolution 8286, Consideration of a Tobacco Business License to Babelon, Inc., Doing Business as Sam’s Food Market, located at 2408 County Road I. Acting City Administrator Crane stated in April the Council approved a cigarette and tobacco license for Sam’s Food Market contingent upon several conditions. She read the conditions in full for the record. She explained that on May 15th staff sent a letter to Sam’s Food Market that their license was about to expire on June 30th. The representatives at Sam’s Food Market had until June 9th to provide staff with the license fee and application materials. Two weeks prior to the license expiring, staff contacted Sam’s Food Market again requesting the license fee and application materials. Acting City Administrator Crane reported that one week prior to the license expiring City staff contacted the City Attorney and had him contact Sam’s Food Market explaining that the tobacco license would lapse in one week. She stated on June 30th staff drafted a letter to Sam’s Food Market informing them the license would expire and that as of July 1st this establishment would not be authorized to sell cigarettes or tobacco products. This letter was hand delivered by the City’s code enforcement officer. Acting City Administrator Crane commented that soon after delivery of this letter, a representative from Sam’s Food Market came to City Hall with a blank check informing staff that he was ready to pay for his tobacco license. Staff informed the gentleman that no application materials had been received to date for the tobacco license and therefore could not be processed. She advised that on July 3rd staff witnessed a tobacco sale at Sam’s Food Market. The police was immediately dispatched as the sale occurred without a valid tobacco license. She explained that the owner was cited for the violation. It was noted July 14th another compliance check was conducted by the City and Sam’s Food Market did not make a tobacco sale. Acting City Administrator Crane indicated staff received application materials and fees for a tobacco license from Sam’s Food Market on July 21st. A. background check was completed and there was an inconsistency with the Babelon, Inc. corporate address. She consulted with the City Attorney regarding this matter. She recommended the Council discuss the matter in detail and direct staff on how to proceed. Mayor Flaherty noted that there were no representatives from Sam’s Market available this evening. For this reason, he recommended the case be postponed. MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Meehlhause. To Postpone discussion on this item to a future City Council meeting. Council Member Mueller expressed concern with postponing discussion given the fact there were people in attendance that wished to speak on the case. City Attorney Riggs advised that the Council could rescind the motion and take public comments. He reported that this was not a public hearing. Mounds View City Council July 28, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 8 Council Member Hull questioned how long the Council would have to wait until a representative from Sam’s Food Market would attend a City Council meeting. Acting City Administrator Crane reported that Sam’s Food Market and their attorney were notified of the meeting. Council Member Gunn discussed the numerous notifications staff sent to representatives at Sam’s Food Market. She expressed frustration that a representative from Sam’s Food Market was not present this evening. She questioned how much more time the City should allow. City Attorney Riggs commented the Council could choose to approve, deny or postpone the matter. If the Council elects to postpone the matter, it should be to a date certain. This option would allow staff to gather additional information on the inconsistencies. Council Member Mueller believed that City Code allows for clear denial of this case given the fact the application contains unclear or false information. She explained that staff has allowed for ample time for the applicant to respond to the concerns that have been raised. She believed that because the applicant was not present this evening, there was a clear lack of respect to the City Council and the community. She was not in favor of postponement, but rather recommended the tobacco license be denied. Council Member Meehlhause agreed and stated he would support a denial of the tobacco license. Fayeth Seith, Mounds View Tobacco, stated he did not want to be put out of business. He indicated his business never sold to minors. He provided comment on Section J. Mayor Flaherty recommended that comments regarding Section J of the Ordinance be brought to the Council under Item G on the agenda. Ayes – 1 Nays – 4 (Gunn, Hull, Meehlhause and Mueller) Motion failed. MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 8286, Recommending Denial of a Tobacco Business License to Babelon, Inc., Doing Business as Sam’s Food Market, located at 2408 County Road I based on City Code Section 512.05. City Attorney Riggs provided additional language to be included within the Resolution. He reported it should be clear that the applicant included false or misleading information on his application. The Council agreed with these modifications. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. The Council agreed to next discuss Item G. G. Second Reading of Ordinance 889, Revising Chapter 512 of the Mounds View City Code Pertaining to Cigarette and Tobacco Products (Roll Call Vote). Mounds View City Council July 28, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 9 Acting City Administrator Crane stated the proposed Ordinance amendment was drafted by staff after the incident at Sam’s Food Market. She reported that on April 14th Sam’s Food Market received approval for a tobacco license with conditions. Staff reviewed the discussion held by the Council during the First Reading of the Ordinance and recommended approval of Ordinance 889 revising Chapter 512 of the Mounds View City Code. Ani Haynes, Mounds View Tobacco, questioned what concerns the City had with the tobacco license holders. Mayor Flaherty commented the City had no concerns but was simply looking to strengthen City Code. Ani Haynes commented that since Sam’s Food Market has opened this business has caused trouble. He did not believe that all tobacco establishments in Mounds View should be punished for their mistakes. He indicated that many tobacco businesses in the metro area sell dugouts, scales, glass pipes and baggies. Fayeth Seith, explained that measuring scales can be used for tobacco for customers that roll their own cigarettes. He indicated the window signs were also a concern. Council Member Mueller recommended the language within Item K be amended to ensure that lessee/lessors properly manage graffiti. Council Member Hull asked if other cities banned dugouts, one-hitters and glass pipes. Acting City Administrator Crane stated it was common for these items to be banned. Mayor Flaherty indicated he had an issue with requiring “No Loitering” signs. He believed that City Code addressed loitering. Acting City Administrator Crane commented that the owner of Vino & Stogies has had concerns with loitering, which led staff to suggest this signage. City Attorney Riggs commented the sign would provide crowd control while also addressing the concern of minors lingering near tobacco establishments. He explained that other cities find this to be an important clause. Mayor Flaherty expressed concern with how the “No Loitering” signage would be enforced by the City. He questioned if the City had the resources to visit each tobacco establishment routinely to bring them into compliance. Acting City Administrator Crane explained that the establishments would be examined through each compliance check. Further discussion ensued regarding the placement of signage in business windows. Council Member Mueller recommended that interior signage remain consistent between tobacco and liquor establishments. She believed that for safety purposes, no signage should be placed in front windows, but understands the business need for advertising space. Mayor Flaherty believed that the building code addressed the sign requirements and agreed that the signage should remain consistent throughout the City. Mounds View City Council July 28, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 10 City Attorney Riggs reported that many of the new tobacco code amendments were being written into law to address the growing concern of synthetics. He explained that provision J would address these concerns. He suggested the Council review this further in a work session prior to approving the Ordinance. Mayor Flaherty agreed with this recommendation as he wanted to ensure that all businesses in Mounds View were being treated equally with regards to signage and code enforcement. Council Member Gunn discussed how the tobacco establishments differed throughout the City and wanted to see the proposed Code amendment address each of these unique businesses. She recommended that tobacco license holders be invited to the worksession meeting. MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Meehlhause. To Postpone action on this item to the September worksession meeting. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. F. Resolution 8282, Approving a Revised Job Description and Authorizing to Advertise for the Police Support Specialist Position. Police Chief Kinney requested the Council approve a revised job description for the Police Support Specialist and authorize the advertisement for this position. He described the duties that would be completed by this full-time employee. He noted the Police Civil Service Commission met and recommended approval of the revised job description. It was his recommendation that the new employee be hired prior to Linda Myer’s departure. Council Member Gunn asked how this position would be advertised. Police Chief Kinney commented the position would be posted on the City’s website and applications would be available at City Hall. In addition, the job would be posted on the League of Minnesota Cities website. Mayo r Flaherty questioned if this was a union position. Police Chief Kinney clarified that this was a non-union position. MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 8282, Approving a Revised Job Description and Authorizing to Advertise for the Police Support Specialist Position. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 8. CONSENT AGENDA A. Resolution 8287, Appointing Gary Lee Rundle to the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Commission. Mounds View City Council July 28, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 11 MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Mueller. To Approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Council Member Meehlhause thanked Gary Rundle for his willingness to serve the City in this capacity. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 9. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS Finance Director Beer answered the Council's questions related to claims. Council Member Hull excused himself from the Council Chambers. MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Gunn. To Approve the Just and Correct Claims as presented. Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. 11. REPORTS A. Reports of Mayor and Council. Council Member Mueller encouraged all Mounds View residents to take part in National Night Out on August 5, 2014. She thanked the Police Department for participating in these events. Council Member Hull returned to the Council Chambers. Council Member Mueller indicated the Festival in the Park Committee would meet again on July 29, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. She provided comment on the car show and numerous other events planned for this year’s festival. Council Member Mueller discussed the Local Economies Committee she was serving on for the League of Minnesota Cities along with the issues this group would be addressing. Council Member Meehlhause reported Twin Cities Gateway met last week at the Mounds View Community Center. He was pleased to report that member cities continued to show positive increased hotel revenues over last year. He explained he had a discussion with Steve Markuson (Twin Cities Gateway), the YMCA and staff about further promoting the Mounds View Community Center. Council Member Meehlhause stated he attended his first Northeast Youth and Family Services meeting last week where the group discussed finances. He explained there was a shortfall in mental health services. Mounds View City Council July 28, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 12 B. Reports of Staff. Acting City Administrator Crane provided the Council with information on the upcoming election. She noted the primary would be held on August 12th with the general election held on November 4th. She discussed the open Council seats and encouraged those interested in a position to visit City Hall. Finance Director Beer was pleased to report the City could now accept electronic payments for utility bills. C. Reports of City Attorney. City Attorney Riggs reviewed his monthly status report. Mayor Flaherty discussed a recent incident a Mounds View Police Officer had with a local pet. This pet required veterinarian services and surgery. The pet owners were notified that the City would cover the expense for the medical pet services. He requested the Council discuss this matter and provide direction to staff. Council Member Meehlhause stated he had little knowledge of the incident but he understood the pet bit a Mounds View Police Officer and the officer responded. He believed that statements were made to the pet owner that should not have been made. These statements were putting the Council in a difficult position. Council Member Hull believed this was a tragic situation and was in favor of the City paying for the vet bills. Council Member Mueller understood the medical bills for the animal exceeded $7,000. She indicated she was a pet owner but did not believe she would proceed with surgery on her pet if the expense was this great. She commented the entire situation was unfortunate. She further discussed the actions that occurred between the Police Officer and the pet. She understood that a figure of authority told the pet owner the City would cover the expense; however, she was not clear how the City would find the money for this unbudgeted expense. She suggested the expense be compromise and split with the pet owner. Council Member Gunn agreed this was an unfortunate situation as the dog was behaving in an aggressive manner. She commented the vet expense of $7,000 should be the maximum amount offered to the pet owner and any future expense would be the responsibility of the pet owner. Mayor Flaherty stated assurances were made to the family that the City would cover the expense of the veterinarian fees. For this reason, he believed the City should cover the initial bills and any after care will be the responsibility of the pet owner. Council Member Meehlhause indicated he could agree with this recommendation. Mounds View City Council July 28, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 13 Gerald Kluthe, 7869 Greenwood Drive, provided comment on his pet, Bandit, noting he was a high priced show dog that cost his family $1,500. He reported his daughter has a number of championships for showing a previous dog. He discussed the incident in further detail with the Council, reporting that the dog had gotten loose before and had been caught by the dog catcher, and questioned why the Police Officer chose to shoot his dog versus using mace. It was his opinion that the Community Service Officer should have handled this matter and not the responding Police Officer. He recommended the police department provide its officers with proper animal control. Mrs. Kluthe provided comment on the number of homes in America that owned pets and encouraged the police department to properly train its officers to handle pets. Mayor Flaherty thanked Mr. and Mrs. Kluthe for their comments and hoped that Bandit made a full recovery. Council Member Hull asked how the police officer involved in this incident was doing. Police Chief Kinney explained the officer has recovered but did sustain a bite. He apologized to the Kluthe family for the incident but explained the officer acted in a manner to protect himself. Council Member Mueller was pleased that the officer had recovered. MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Gunn. To Approve Payment of the Veterinarian Bills in an Amount not to exceed $7,000 to the Kluthe Family. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 12. Next Council Work Session: Monday, August 4, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. Next Council Meeting: Monday, August 11, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. 13. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 p.m. Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.