Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014 Planning Commission PacketsMOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA January 8, 2014 -- 8'002.M. -`j Oc' i j„ , 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Special Order of Business A. Oath of Office for Commissioners B. Election of Officers — Chair and Vice -Chair 4. Approval of Minutes: November 6, 2013 5. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 6. Planning Cases None 7. Other Planning Activity A. Review Crossroad Point Development Area Visioning Process (oral report) 8. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, January 22, 2014 B. Wednesday, February 5, 2014 9. Review Minutes: A. December 4, 2013 10. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 11. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 12. Meeting Conclusion PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting December 4, 2013 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for December 4, 2013 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Carvelli-Yu, Cramblit, Elofson, Love, Rundle, and Stevenson. Absent and Excused: Commissioner Schiltgen. Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller. Index to Minutes Page Approval of Minutes 1 Discuss Possible Code Amendment in Chapter 1010, Wetlands 2 Review Commissioner Applications for 1 Expiring Seat 2 Set 2014 Planning Committee Meeting Schedule 3 3. Approval of Minutes October 16, 2013. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Cramblit/Commissioner Rundle. To approve the Minutes of the October 16, 2013 regular Planning Commission meeting as presented. Ayes — 6 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting December 4, 2013 Page 2 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. 5. Planning Cases None. 6. Other Planning Activity A. Discuss Possible Code Amendments in Chapter 1010, Wetlands Planning Associate Heller discussed the Wetland Chapter of the City Code. She proposed a portion of Subdivision 4 be reworded to allow for a non -conforming property to be built on without requiring a variance. She requested comment from the Commission on the proposed code amendment. Commissioner Carvelli-Yu requested further clarification. Associate Heller discussed the proposed language change in further detail. She explained that the wetlands would still be protected through another portion of City Code. Commissioner Elofson asked if the wetlands were regulated by the City. Associate Heller explained that the Rice Creek Watershed governed wetlands that were an acre or larger. The City had governance over smaller wetlands. She then discussed the wetland buffer zone that was regulated by the City. Chair Stevenson requested staff read Subdivision 4 for the Commission and asked where staff was proposing changes. Associate Heller read the language in full and proposed amending the language in Letter A. The Commission recommended staff proceed with the proposed code amendment. B. Review Commissioner Applications for 1 Expiring Seat Planning Associate Heller informed the Commission that Commissioner Gary Rundle's term was expiring on December 31, 2013. The City advertised the open seat and the City received two applications, one from Gary Rundle and the other from Jessica Birken. Staff had invited Ms. Birken to attend this evening's meeting. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting December 4, 2013 Page 3 Commissioner Cramblit announced that he would be resigning his position with the Planning Commission effective December 31, 2013. Associate Heller stated this would allow the Commission to appoint the two applicants to the open seats. The Commission recommended the Council appoint Gary Rundle to a three-year term and assign Jessica Birken to the remaining term for Keith Cramblit. C. Set 2014 Planning Commission Meeting Schedule Planning Associate Heller reviewed the 2014 Planning Commission meeting schedule. She indicated January was a month of concern as the first Wednesday meeting date fell on January I". She recommended the meeting be pushed back to January 8d' at 8:00 p.m. This would then push the second meeting of the month to January 22nd. The Commission agreed to leave the July and September meetings as is. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Cavelli-Yu. To Adopt Resolution 996-13, Establishing the 2014 Meeting Schedule of the Mounds View Planning and Zoning Commission. Ayes — 6 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. December 18, 2013 8. Review Minutes: A. November 6, 2013 The Commission discussed the November 6, 2013 meeting minutes. 9. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. She reported Apple Tree Dental began construction this week and invited the Commission to attend the official Ground Breaking Ceremony on December 9, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports None. 11. Adjournment December 4, 2013 Page 4 There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 7:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA February 19, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: December 4, 2013 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases None 6. Other Planning Activity A. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion B. Review Crossroad Point Development Area Visioning Process 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, March 5, 2014 B. Wednesday, March 19, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. January 8, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion Item No: 6A MOT NDS vI� Meeting Date: February 19, 2014 lJ1ViJ ♦ i�.�Y Type of Business: Other Planning Activity City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: County Road 10 Corridor Discussion The corridor continues to be the City Council's priority and the Planning Commission has been reviewing the Zoning Code in order to better promote and accommodate development alona Countv Road 10. The Commission has now amended the City Code to change the requirements for ground signs on properties that are on the Corridor. The Code was changed to lower the allowed heights and require higher quality design materials, but the signs can be closer to County Road 10. Our discussion began by focusing on creating a Corridor Overlay District in order to give more flexibility to new projects on the corridor. The City is willing to be flexible on requirements such as setbacks, parking, density and height, but the City also wants projects that are high quality. I have included the chapter in the Envisioning Better Communities book about transforming highway commercial strips. None of the highways talked about in this chapter are as wide or fast as County Road 10, but there are some ideas and photos of good and not -so -good streetscapes and buildings. Recommendation Continue the discussion about a County Road 10 Corridor District Overlay that would promote and support development on the corridor. Sincerely, Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Part Five of Envisioning Better Communities: Transforming Highway Commercial Strips into Mixed Use Centers and Corridors (pages 119-167) a� w H Cd P-4 C° aNi 0y v 0 o v v � Jo C 'oo end >? a -d vb � �v � cn v'y b O � •p O 0vbb p v IZI 'F' H �' .� T lJ 'yam 0 NNS, > ri 04 v to Z43 v d W °o ° u w° U iJ V9 C'. ti cd C� " O O N 'y 7 'N �y CN N O b c� 4 v ° �F/.O b o 0 w o -dow� 0 3 cG 3 d arv�3 0 3 V • p.q W - bvn �y .-o . N "gni O v w O "� bA n. 0 bA �0 0z ' " , v -d 0 -d ' O o Ov c •pC d v W N G y �r74 ocd �6+0 �j �u+, bn ® • O .� -d y -° v 'meq `" • a 6 k -A ° C '� v El 04 o o���". x 'U bU G Cyd "l�7 ry CO N 0 o •H � P] "� "d .a .0 o N v E q .� O b p" -,! O NomN' a p? PO' p ro to t< p O P. °G Coq '4 qnq G°.. O" O pq .y tlq rt O P. n° O pC U. w p N rCo fE N �, p tryo �' w 0. p p. ? ry �' h.• O w w wrt F as CQ, . w n 0 'T ^ p ti o 0� cr on ro ]y ] oo w n ra '.l �'yi �C N y �. O �j-4.. -y � p� G O P a w CM P+ o0 P- 0 PL t C b rt° p a4 z N n O oupc � w r C m _p" o G• rt Y' .N.. P. w by F O O ro N B b p'• O O P. y 5 0 0 . w N „ vc "'ro 0 vPa o o �. CL p !-� tND N Fry ry N w q tv P. o o a ° ° �° �•' C w F: Y rl ry Pj N W v o -T Et, C R ° fD n ° y B° N o d° o G'• rn o w a O ro ° P I 0 o N rya 5 ti 0 Ory Of D '`i. r� H N or. 00- o q 0 PV CO A O H° ry 0 cr 0 U n N O r N N 4 tl 3•tea v a o u 0 3 u1 N o GA g j�" bA y b NC). v o J A y O -d cl,ap bA C t ,b 6v4"n^� ccvdd 'J w [ c o o 0 ti -00 wU o v o ! way[ •� � z p qC(�{ 1 l 101 o•�.°o•� o v '" �.o bb W bA w 0- P, Ili - G °gy o w H ]E 9- P 51 9 o° g N �j o p ° � � V •� � y � ��V tt N 'TJ � y�-r' � bW (� p. tnn n w'n. � O n mJ F'n OM y n -0 .n. b �• a o O y n pa �0 �O �Vq p, ror^ r 0 S. On O Q✓ y `C `v a0 .0 C w I- d to ^ w n q O �' 0.. a. ro. a�° y o �2 dA ti h7 R. ryeN' too W a(3*. tnpt O' O' v f° O O N g- `C N N O fno rn p, . tlq ° °r P m H �. a UQ "0'.."� w O ryo on a `° ° o' �' �+. rno n w a✓ w. a� v n a G a N aq co o0. b °- ° w w P. `I P ° a G' 8 w aq o- o P P wno {p1+ G P-- 4,oy �a wror0 °° ° 0 io w ° f.� . W°rr aq b S y ° a O: � .n-. O �'i n E' n n n 'O ri0i N rnii r'� PPG y ' ro P �' P. w' �° �' ° 0. '-h 0 o0S a a o o H o °N Ky O n e o° P. W ^•O Wp w ro ,9 On P. rt ❑ y O a �i �'. -PPI ja ° .Ti P. O p,, n � ."'r' In O -' O O ow e UQP�° w N a n ropq vi ro .5. no n G G P- w n O G w yr 0 0 on �. P- o .d n # N P a O vni tno a' ro pnp �r�n .D n R O n ❑. n 'OJ' N°o b O" n r� Z CL n �. `C n P- O C. ,�' Y y G, n n y o 0 O C]^ P' °• a qq P. d ri iso ] - ti 0 10 a P- J W N U° n. ° o 0 n G pa .. a G :r 'O N y aq <,CL w " y rox' n R. aro O G,R trin n tlq aqcr 0 o n n' o n n. oa- n n G 0. O n o a 0w n W aq a °G o O C• .o o- a'f0 n n n e n 'w��j �. .^.. w G �a-b w �. Gio p P- cr C. C w 0 n -n tlq P- c9 ti tlq p' P o , P- n M w n `C a rn° v,' o 0'4 a io w y a rr n ro°0....'1-1 P- r^ �• O G ',?. p my O ° a a n P-� N N 1 m`0 °/B B%° j0 ■ 9 h`�1 ° IA AIA o® �Im L �l ❑i — _ „tea_. ®y _w e I OA A im s IIjj""Ana ®p�j i I 19, o p $ <or�r,, aq O O G �' a va I 17 m In N. ^ u IZv `d0 [ -d uN -d av+ -d.bA v wOv I ti C ° te° y N'vQ ° b y4 O O bA > "" -y[ ao [= 'd '�y v [[ N •bA o tl v ba v° bA —v 7 Qo xi u> v -o r .-v ,v.vp o 04 [ °O bA o . v d u pg�++ yy � �-! Q •C O .d o-.1 - bA N G N v 'V w +� O '> o bA 'Ocbi)Ya ..d '4, d 'T� u -d N -i� 'Uv �. �ca�;b � Usi u v b FPr [ 'Ndb°Hd❑A vvY o -j -X 8ti° ❑��ObA v 1°11 u Q ❑ -6 °4G, 0 oA u �v,ryy o a J"yd v bA '�a4a °"P. . o u p o ° N[ W N .Y U N, ro n• N "Y [ N (U Y y, v ,N„ c2 O O °u W .[ v va+ ai vzzdp n [ °wd u°b ,v N 'bdO 'O O 0 �/pO A O O aN Y y' ❑ v 46 w A C14 v-04 i G >>C�v"p dvp^u 'tl [ v 0 vW v u ,�wv N v O u`� O on o p .a.vow� ca v 0 0 [ s• J b cd 'O o vU` >C� 'd 1"' u A 9 ` q .n Ovp O bAY 'V 'O vo a>3 > w o > v� v�a.9'0� g Y N Tj u o wp0 O.•�V61) m n -0 C:) °bA pNF v o �acvd �~o �0 �v on C 0O u u bA v boA >o, , 3 0000 -W [o fiIO JO a wv 4 WA v o o '0y{ •o C w � ami" `y' .a 3 »� N °❑ v � bl) �u+ � o -14 .u°y U r� , .V 0 b �0 0 ,Nn u� Ya .0 0 4 5 0 o 3 N[ +-� q bA •�p P o o ai W -9 � 0 'yc-j+ O b �L up w �-' � u '14{] p •y., .1�� ,.vC 'O' bm nq v '� -6 �>.- I4—j M [ �i� a1 'T7 v a1 �biA A N .O O -EJL w oy °vyG �[ vCPuSnwv$l 5CO O b( ] yvv Cbv P!❑d . Tv �O u O. O y " � A Ot0°i V Av -flu ' o U O° o .[ ° ° n° w .a -C: a. w � yvJ 3 5 w G 5 IN - 1 � 5Rw ten, • ,.o r, N ( y n n G p n o� w re G' o 0 o o v n ^ w• ry y !D 5a� ao dG t4 ren DD0.. tl ^ w y '"� �• P- .�-• �n to 4 .�... b Old 00 h m .Q rDi 0 o w o oo r—,win w p-aoq yy o o a o o o R. N10 o o n n I o n o P n o . o b bP P-. C tl9 0 t'YD y pp' ��f �l�r, p !D n• O 0 O C [�D � T �� O D D y �' '�-� a� e: ❑ p n o o o n N c� ti m F� :l N w NO >,=N •C -,-i.+ qO L O d W y H° H � O -71 v 0 0 . 3 0 a v° y s�pW LLam.. A' p ~ O tt,L�° •vaNt •.�v" w ��!! aaaJ�� N G tjo > z p > by o' o o. G Ory n R. 41. � a . tlo. N a o ro' w o O O Q• p� ro a o C n a o p H 'Y r"WwT' Sti p O' ry p4 G P. �N* 5 w .wF'1 0., y. (<D N Q ti. �• H (D (Gj p- �. tl0• �° p] ry H n w O Pi P -a C a cfQ O P' b a �y rt� IOi N 'G w O by ry V G Q b co .Ga. y nly n a" G .-� m O rn P- n ro v, a riq P ' ] K rt on o w a b a]° p a ao a ate" a •0 �' r"o ry o" w crt�'o R- .H- �i O a Q, P• n O s o rtw 7 n ry M n d �. o ro dQ rt ry ry c� o <. ro o w �^ w rt a' r `C 6 a o rww by o y° ^p b< w CaC a p� tlq `-I G P � a• a' •' en to C Va � L�. P Y• rt pN d o O.P0 wyaq ti .ipGy O n ftQ o o yy b rn p p R In � H H � P. � to M O ry n v4Fy- i°v,' a `n y w c"o P�' C .ar .0 �0 '•� �, @@ `C P• a n :� o'• 'NI N n v4 ro o w y `° H wtTj O ao!�• G P• a rt N rn " a m r. N� a- N O rt a rT lrtD „ "Jro " P- '* O �• C a O ryyG p �' P n a a ,n_, 'rtl 0.O P. n 17• � ti �'. n `wV' n O w P �• {U P' H P- �`�" .r"- rao r O P p' y P' n G n C. o• n v' a "o o 0. o p `' rrtNi •o .p7 rypp. O `jp'+ C y w yP' w a�va H G o,R � w o a' o o 0.o 7ypP- v4 ry ryP- R' P- p P, q Ow ypP'ooq bO o Go v�m4 ' o nw Go p„. P- 0 UC? n v ,.a Pt 0 n `ryC pn ' _ w n wcuou '.� O '� H P' n G P w -e O b �, P• v, a o X 0.a .ai "Y. rn P- ova ... ° w❑ n tl4 G o a' O N. P. n �n a 0..N ry n0 y. "' O n �.�°, ." o w .".. �a H P a v o tl h nj nfNPo nOL.rw" <ovNu tirt OQ O tlyy�a!� rpt rbb , C�pp O�a', b r:r' w O G 'T� H G o n H a- N bC '"I P '�' a H0 '��+• � .J � Pi'i a• � .�LI`. � . ro I 0. I :� I �. H rt �' . iD i� GR .w-. n ."' i M P N N bb W b "� y�j �V�++ -�j U "A � bA 1^i G O by cd .`�„ n i n .'�, q U H n n 7 w y CvC71 y 3 ri n C •-C C � 4 ... ('i N u; ip w _�✓' n p `C rt n o - O" tl(aD F O4 iC �9 O nn C '� N "n'D_ n �' F G O rt rho• +1 vp4 y o O C •'~f U' w o w C n `Y C) W a O, W O n n rt a2Hn" 5;4 p n w P. oo- p. g o c yC p w o vi ry ° p� cr y n p`u 'O Oio' fp'. Rn x ry S- py F- ry �. O tl4 N tp r~n ra a a C51 n p ° '�' `yam n cCo W W a' py P x o� op mac -a Qa d o U. p P G �'' n p p p rt CI9 � rto � '^ C'.J• Q. P- ten, is �" �.. n mry p' ga- 8 c �6I:;Bw° qN �ro E �' g• rt Y p Lj rt. ro C tj ,Q.. N p w ti p No y u w p- nQ (p0 1 Ir 00 0, p (CG z Oq 00N 0 Si E 4 N M bb v a� O� a w o o o E ° w o o °p0 A te' ^ p.. `C ° `° ^ y rJ' w p co 8 oa o •o 'op G . :'- a0 ci Ua ry ry �C• G o' a y ,°s. o a 9 w ^ � og prv�oa.EPL�y° onaQl IL ��wtl4°h��P^ °ooa������o rtvw0 OLa boa0 6o°� b *, o 0 p- °' w' c va �'• " a- °a :; a ti °rob G N + (D ' •°`' Qrv.G °noontvni� El - :P w ^ N nnUV Q• aw °iWo w� on Q. o ro n m , rt pi7 N �' G ry o a C p ^° ro C A.. p- o a•, o aate' no oa a u o ya a s o 'ro `C o ,� �' h n ro y % D•' N .,, O C - ro co a- (7 �" P; c`T.• �, (G°. r' ('��'• 7a' n r r .o w C. Q. w Clan N w N s I 3' Illlk r.R.f 'I p qp'dq� ��"Y I � ti �I c � ` i 4 � 1 w�dL to.3:,. � Fi 'd ID - n Cp P O O f`^} �. O p L' O R p B O P O G- o p n tl9 � 0 ro N y ro 0- " G ro E u "�' O y' ^ .%1 P W o b pp R. n,~ �n . M k•'n7 ro pw KJ WWpo�pPp rob n UQ tlQ w Pa 0'q 'kr•' ro P 0. p p �° o p- w .9 .o ry �° ^ W o �' • Op o `.T' ul `^. n7 0.h H n w oo rno ° ro ^ G w rt ro W ^O^" O 1-4. P 0 O O. p' �. w 0. 0.O° p ro P' 0 �',0 1n p � p�a° 0 o- Qri Iyh R P' o p -w ;o ' nUQ tlQ °n° �' 5'- s'ro g•� E bo �0 (° ooP,� O O "" O N O ' `ro 0 o' y b o ti w1°�o 9 a.ao W° �"Va Gr a- 0 `" w Vw �� 0 w Q' Oqo ° A" 0bd 0 o onn n1-1 0 ii, .N'OT' wr ^pGo� Rotla OAP- T Dp�p , O rt (w't1 - tirt.rop�'.• , `pCro� bA p�: ..ti O N.T C nn n P' y wi• ��n. hWi n �° `-r C 0 p� t* • I w a. q N r FI p w P pJ' .� 0„ Fn-. rte, ;� ON P Q' O y � � N (:Q Q ri P+ 1 N 1 1 �i N ° Ili O � � ° I � M7 o �, tla• a ,a ao �- p,'v P a p• y �,• o w n p p 0 P. E'ro vpG � &,a p O4 P- iC 0 ` 00 `0aq�° m { ort �y o �-h oq 0q, 1 , 1O w a �' , G U. o .C.. ° 'II iC p n E tlQ r� y p a 0.P p o 10^^`�'�.•, wyn ti^ .v r`C' . ro n O UQ 0 O a Ff' p 0 � o yUQ ,cE cm F py_p� wp •po �rn^w �p ato rowpj g�o �p°a P. ^0 p p y O n w P-roo tn o 0o 0 F oo lv" :nz pnp ' ° A o ro rr o ro n p o E o P A o a r� g ro �w o opo' ro ly °caro dam° o a °aaa�o°o p p w d a y o p as o o ro y° u P P o O UQ W rn m n p w E r.l n n p w O ro CC ro m G m C ;.1 A rn Nr b rn o C b Oy P- N N o"I,ror UQ tlpQ P 0.tl9 ry O 5 p s' ro G w � tlq dq � " p• � o' � '- °' w' n G W �• P. C 1x1 � P"'nm aP" 0 Y . .^. tlrN4 7 0 o na•w aq w d t35 P� p�Oro O 'O ryn 7�-' x0r 0?- w�41a 0y 1x1 o vl O R" p o`p' �, tl,9++ 102 ° 0a . - 4- CLQ xbaa p ro O . n y. t 1 Ol I Fq% f�»r§]\\\} !v ;/j y) §:m e/)««2e�afl7s 3a\\$\\\/ \wq (077~\ ® H —0 //f)ƒ]( �70a n O' "a �J '.T. w G o rgy rt N r-- �• w .fS' '� .~' O l~n c tl o 0 0 o N a: �a ti H 0 ., O 0 ''�' r ,y N (D �N. ' k ro w A o ova nr o w a- n H o G c° x 0.6'- 0 0 0 0 o E o pac B o n n o o c o 0 o' as Pn va D sUQ 0 0 0 n 0O' "C3 N �UQ n �M p �' (0 pM ~ Vl p (U a• N rT r"1 r"]• QrQ r pa o M° ^ o � oti n m' 5 w ry on to, a° o pa_ v ^n °°' b v c o -0 w y °a9 a tl°p 2 0 rr Q• o a 2 c. ry ;n �, Z P4 c o ❑, tli co ^ p rn p rc o m U.9 N w G\ 5 n h7 m r, A 00 n v� W rte' Jq 6 J'2 ,Q R p ,0 'oOn°'n RSro no no^o N n VQ n O .o G N O w N .(�".•' O P-. p o G o o• nn o 0�1.° o - aa y .-� o p n m Pj' rn n w pp�� G rn �n w y ¢' �' H ,],. '� O �' w n a' •, '.7 P- P p G 0. n p w O n G Ua p E' -n y�2 o p• w 0 0 ° �' ti ^• C p' Vi°o o n a ., �- a ° �, n. SC G Q n o h P �. h o G °' 5; tr� wQ n :'� `a O H n �'. O G n w -n Q-'* w n n na° w° b o o. o cRn H Q a "° a o xPro 5'a n c o o "� P ° ° nL o ti p ? • �a �a o ° n F. R via u $ w Q a p o v p o W C w n n o ° n ° r a n o o .7n Q. P- N N. p n G � y 0. o �• o A•. y„ o- o o m. m� o �a y o Ej' ° o a v 2 oro .. cn TL-. �•. .� n n o p- VPc lv p., �. n' ° a. p .fi VG O' `•�-'d H a n w �' "p .n' �q n p_, �+, C� b P n A tdq_ 'F� b O' w `vp�yR, w P- °?. 'o o F— o, fD Cp o �' P.. p 'H7 rS`irill—'' P p P b n P a O �• .o L'_ ° n n w rt O p o G G o o a O y 9 o A H' o n o 'Q r'- ° o w �� Pl (7 0 a s o w n n bry a rPf. �v ' c7G ❑ N% �t� y ry o p A" S •,n -r F H n o .rorT' p 'O ] .C-. -0 '0 r r dao '0 oR. y' m y pp��7 o P. �. '" # �a o n' ro ti ' O A 0 C� P- N w `'YV (nn� 'OD p$i. �` �. v� O rtr°ry O RNn' O „��. O ronG� ona°ao•°'„o8o�G 4a° Z oaaGrt. ycp RE � va ro o G1 ro �. - o- o o 1a ., ti n C w o °� ar o 0ryry5' S' Z^ Z m p�p� o H o rJ• P• ` w Q. n `v� P n p• w y P n °�. �. O tlap-•p Pao,. m °ri, p-] ° t��o' p''°-” '"• ° G"G �`' o C, ro o. o .��`' Q a P- o G. "n �•p w o"4 0 o o a; ro n �° `a'�� ° �..o a.o CL n • M H N NO ro P. `CoFMgi '" N "�D' p• " ro'� `C `p' Q �`�' ryC o" cr ° O O. n �. C p �On' fO np �n ry ]. "rod'-' 0 r�' P- �p� C �• �Y, r O LI: n P •.T• •C .�• o ww 0 0 0 0 o' ° Gp w� o p. Q a o w x a° cr �i V9 n O N fD "o °On pq o R: C P.. O tD '.-T' O 0� ��jn no ° W O W tlQ, N �; w �' �S1 Ort nI-i w• o �' ° o o- ' R-- w aonc 6� 5 Pn N ry �' i n in m ry D o p. G ry o h v �ovAso ^p :� o. C p w •� -pd v 6� -ci c� ro o w o O U 'y •F o O y Ei v44 ro ,br O a O o Ob y .�iy' b .�v t�o� o _n y ro 5 0 � td G� c N O U N W N O U O y ° jg yU 3 ab 0 j..0 -d ro W � ''' G4 'd w �' �O 0Q- 04 O y. -O W.tw "d a' a O Q a v pa o 0 O 6 ✓� N 4. �.` vi 'O g o . y H .[ -n 3 > 2 ❑ryud� o p�D o g '� 3 y o C4 v C � ?� U v M r1 y 0 _(! (�°y Ou w y 'w OU Ou u y h •� •yam' Y -a .N .o p a.x L4 N o ❑ ❑siy C 4 >v> 0 H W W m �A .� M W bl � r" bn 'n ^p :� o. C p -j " 7 5 o -pd v 6� ro o w o o 94 o ao wo o u 3 v a O o Ob b .�v t�o� o _n y ro 5 v, o V ro q 5 Id ❑� ° jg yU 3 ab v W oo ''' G4 'd w �' y O O •ril 0Q- 04 O y. -O W.tw "d a' a O Q a 6 ✓� N 4. �.` vi 'O i= p . y H .[ -n akl b 2 ❑ryud� 3 y C � ?� 0 M r1 Ou w y 'w OU Ou u y h p w 2 o U w ao wo a� ° vJ • -uu b .�v t�o� o _n 0 � bn o o� v `v 0 Id ❑� m n, �p O b ry N 'O v4' o n p m o � �. � 0.7 rno nw too ' n J� n :I e. o �O a ., o 0 oo- 0 P- R- 0-. p PL p G p n �° o V O- w o w o' rrrrn f0 p-. x A a „ N 2 aq K� °i P. ° ,Ni R w p C aN a o O o w o �a va' w w n ti w n N O .� V I.EoaGgo�^•n�° p nW�y O n n �at�4q b P. n 'OTM N�.'hj �• y P n n '°_h W aqq Go, rt p O. p' p w ,y 'v44' vG, ro w -' R ac•m � ti �b 8 ao tea• a, 'd �' `n° °, o° o o �, F w aq a pqn aq (wu ryry r1 N � q�! � n N �"• d .� 'a p° p N° p_ V' F V r+ tlq p n 0 o p n �. n N ry o• oo .� rnoo 0 p 0 N ' n n rn o O P O ry ��•�' °Ox xp ti 9.o5 o a� . w z aq Vl G1 Vr z ffq l!� 01 W o dna' 95 n �ilW Q' N iy °, w• off ,0 OH p' y `� R" O n �-• `C 77 rv' ° � � � w �� 5• n• p �.' O. v" ° u o n 0 q o p+ o n o ❑, 0 •• �• N p �, LP .O. P. .v ry Dnp � oro 2 P °n 2• o o �ra"v" P-° p'5 0-8 atn by G ry r-4 p0 pm�P po p r, o rt p� N n O n� W y rpi • n p. n w V rt b cn o' b y' �-' t� w ;; " o p P- poJ' n u' A b ro G A' w rG" tOo 0 ° y n0 (D i°j up�ry q dQ' G� n b p 0 a 'O • H aq �. < " ti n. P- ., no .. ., .A „-� rm W �'• w C) 0 H A m '3 ''! bA ~O 4 o N S�'U q o u W by N c'i� a 5 vSo 'A r� y� v H• v v u O to N byA C A H td v ,N d o .F: �r —� k Ocd [NP y 11. O ctl �bA N O -� 7i d 0 to O -d M .[ > �NOy N `n -d O do o o C cd O O .5. �v'i C a-d•N N �''' C14 v -N O GU 04 •-� p v o 1 v Apia 'dr .-� n bb w o �. o �-' o �,� w �' 5- y 0 0 0 'c' r. "' 0 5' 0 FSG p n °° o ��rL `ti N f74 bw. G �, p' w .�wi O' O E b% '°'� p p n y tCo O' o y �! n p- :5 a a a `C too 411 0 to p- n • , �. C- p., o^ rn y �' n �' V w• �' ° ] pCL d w w w o o 0 5 0 0 'v �. o a w . UG n `C ^n n n a' n o o L°-. �• r w F"o tla iWn w ti �i .7' tno a y y C Q' w O tv �wra m .C-, w 0.`7 i., Uy P- 0 0 Z � � y � �• c:n ry �" o E. � Q n w p° C w» o o UQ o �• n• „�Y. �fn, ELM 10 n ag r tj �n C m n ti p „"' n r .n- U4 y P'i rr O. rs 'd G `'r. ^ N ry N �' Uw C C• .wh-, W O 'b y P n R- 0. ]°o a aq CL o - o hi o o y y w a w„ a� o m cm C) n' W P. Urnv' w i° v, P �' P. I r 1 0 0 9 � N P- n• coo 'i °rn z UP ,A 00 0 z alp H �' • X . '7• W w �" gw O .4 �. o w G: �°-n o o oa w a n tea/' �. °" P-' a ° (y 4`1 `C `� �' r ,� v O H 0 �' F� rT o aQ .'� Q-• W (➢ bA ^CJ w oo O U O O v ivy 11, N _W i H O h by .0, m 6D od�o �� -� no' q •� u � � O � bA uo v O y� ;� ni n, o p 0 v C Irl, z of O v � v! p 'D4 �N+ u y G 00 „q h bn v ia v �L o 0 v o 3 q U O O •d � O w 'L1 ti� v 7� pp O `ai• bq � v u' O � '� [ � 'b o h O v b[A ,v.. C 'rte+ '�' ani �°i� o� b � .4 °1 'd j3 v t qG N O '�' W /r h t Y O N a y � v 4 N 'O y aNa 'b OU N NN 4 O O O o mbn g OU :� -n O u ^ OU 4i > A P. ..O 00 00 v� bb W. �2i � 444 bA ^CJ w oo O U O O v ivy 11, N _W i H O h by .0, m 6D od�o �� -� no' q •� u � � O � bA uo v O y� ;� ni n, o p 0 v C Irl, z of O v � v! p 'D4 �N+ u y G 00 „q h bn v ia v �L o 0 v o 3 q U O O •d � O w 'L1 ti� v 7� pp O `ai• bq � v u' O � '� [ � 'b o h O v b[A ,v.. C 'rte+ '�' ani �°i� o� b � .4 °1 'd j3 v t qG N O '�' W /r h t Y O N a y � v 4 N 'O y aNa 'b OU N NN 4 O O O o mbn g OU :� -n O u ^ OU 4i > A P. ..O 00 00 v� bb W. rt'+ D no �' 7� P- �,, n U� ° p rt rt n w p Ort-• 7 ri P- .y p tryi 00 p O' 0P n a' N ,"O} r O y r• 0� 0 .'7 GQ CO' 0 "• no ��niwJ'U �"'S a�p. •o �n���w�". v�K, �'fppiy�'� . �� '`C�p �0 �a i� �m offro_' a°oii�� . '�rta ro~�✓'' GO 00 w na?o n O O O �rt tlp qo o- aro�OoO° '`OoGfino+, 0 CN '• Np oKa op m la,5• P °� o n rt aq � ay acrP° 00 ' CL W O�, a y' y �, QT, D•' ro w uc w "* G n •* o b a „ n nn G k� ] da ,+f'a.• ice. O fo P. �' ,Y., ,i . �" C. �. n p. 5 u rv° 5 n 5. ao wa o o b x o o D] 5< cr w D Q w o n s v o w P_ ry ce ry ((u� �a' m tl4 P R- "F � °i �'-. � n f�D P. .,i Wy � ro' �' n' �n i • N a z tlq W ail qq V1 00 W Frl 60 V °A~. 9- 5'0n Z w ry rt.r' w w rt v0i L7.' 0 n rn H uy Z4 bl) [ Y dv� bA;b -� U Oo H v 4 'n 0 cud v c'43 Y JA O+ ou -b G ti u 0 v .�A , � 04 u �+ v �O�!! Lr4 .0 v n v y Y p bn •-4 o y 0 o 3 � a o b o y N N 0_0 Q N .4 �-d w w u u E '� o °o' �v O G uu v .."� G p r v Y 4 - v Oa ..p?' O .� .�. ��u OU 4' c 4 rY-i P N �c c> ° n o p w w w r�• a y. �y b CJ G x a `c .o b G o y G o N N. ° 'U 3p C• UQ a o ' " �o Ca p iG �• C �, wp w Ei' y y 0 G 0 H o °p y y n r as o PL qq a '� G w A O O b O L7-. G: P �. yy uq R •i~ij U Q P y n vi N O �c c> ° n o p w w w r�• a y. �y b CJ G x a `c .o b G o OA w bA p v 'a'j bA ^C `4v�• a1 pv "d ai o o O H S Oy v 'c7 (14 +' u O v J-0 4 �y V v 43 v v v �H! 'O -b �"pip 1a " y "-0 ' 7+ -g5 .° a Ra v U a—� , ry ''a''� " W N w .`.q �n Gw a y0 D[A FIJ v u 03 u bra 7g ?i 2 r v bA'd v g v v--,Ibp `�' Cla v N o cq N 0 0 -� u Our u u N 00 :j 0o o `d H RR bcri H a H a o g H v i o 'v '� °' bA ° a qr 3..c m ap d A -n .a w!L2 o "ZIJ, UO H C w o a Pa' no Td n ti .00 b. o .Ni C7 �. �' w f+7 gi [�*• ° G i4tlq „ O G Y. — 0 �.. n A �'. O „y e� ° �. by all t{o �v v' M w fD y tj o F n N tlq co 0 w C. w � �' ri R• WW� A ^ o �,ro ra ^rn o wuq $ a w o o 0 �a �, o w o y o co G 0 o n o �.'_"', y tlq PC y tlq to • by lzy a o a ° ao °a ,n < o � vq U- P- -.10 x �. ra O ci n cn Lm ti G tlQ• -X- ] ' 7 ° O'- `v ° pry p O O ,��• �. O !{( �i a(Ln�p. 9 1pO�i o k.P- by 0• p, O .- G P tCL ao' Y -r .�'r' 4t F� �-1 P-• p N n r m o rn .� W 1� ry �, • w �-• `4 O ''] p .T O 10'h R' � p P O on g. nP•- CI✓' Gv1 P• ° Po O uZyp Cy ]op oO Nryy, n :n �- N G R 0� � aW . J 0-0 0 N 9L aq o y o w aay a a o 0 0 0 0 �9n a P- 0 O m x w F' R' 8 O P. o p n r0. ry M �, ^ rt vR N n K7 �C �, w B m •t°., G o C C 04 y O o o 0 r p° 'N' ort ro` o w. R. n — m ��tD! ^ b ° C n .", pG� �' ra' .�'-1 p '". �i w o ' a (D ✓ (� C �tlq � •. 1 1 Vl L+ 1 N 1 rt 1 N 1 rt i� y� 1 z tlQ F-) C) N o 0 O 7rt 1ty A lH m 1- n p ' °G Y n bo G ch H Ili 0 b ' w `-, : ' O E UqP• 00 0 bA w c� 0 b w b w •q "�C7 �yv, by.7 O W b 'd �' N •C o [ Y >. -�'v!i Ivy O 'p G ';��r` Fly ca 'w ov o G a cd 'a x 'y- o x o. 3 �c y a .O ° V N "N bA ° y I �.� OA �'A O ..v. ,p "'�' 'd !-� bA �'' 't1 o O [ .[ YN ,Cy ay. O y _Q w v N •-�• 0 v �.± a�J -cj ilij [ " " - r� ��o�m o� gy°o.8"uoy .y.-�°G ,vb � -dy Ou v O ° i -6 O p 048 - -0 t [ � °� ou ooV v bA "0 bioq-jjd � z do W+ �y 7 O v �. by .-� N +-' •ta O v ..c'. 0 3 ov y ov o n o v o v o.0 Y Y A �.9 0 o'a ,y, as o.o o v o .N se a v •byn .� v Y >. u ° d oxo [ o[A p p gw 3 bAJ u 3 ?•a aA o °b °" �� ° ° N -1,� O14 N ."' °. ❑ .T:s [ v y, U U Y v u 3 w n N .r v O 3 (� w u° 0 •"•, trJ fJ ` ry bC ZT' NryN p' w V�y 0"1 ^ w ay+`o �i o ro o , SO :n - P- rof° L+ rt° cr n ° O ro °o' .N'. n m G w P Pr W. G rt ti p'.d p'� m n Uq .°,� y N a p w o n m ,b o mo C3 0 q P 9 tiq P P '� 71 `C 0 ao �' p 13 �'• ��. ppn++ 'O n .�'i o o o o n aq o p N P N m ro (p ww o 0- va n� n n a0 10 o o y �. w n G o y, P G v. w y ° w S �. ��-• ro o ry y ori w ,nom ^ T, TOy u n 4 aq N 'U• V'tr °n ]• ry ~ ,m, pOH' 0• m 0 m C G pi 4L 0 'n y N p N G no IL HPa. �pp 0 On z U~q• v, H W �• P G m " N �p n 'J ppi� n �p �"'ry"pi � w �`� � f' 'n hQi n0 r� ro ry `C m O O .i G Pin G y' ti G n iii O ^i ^r P- � m u, '.zv � n � G i-1 n :r m C. m � ]• C n m .-. ., V� O I 4 m N 00 bA W N bb w N N bG W bp-flv y,,b' bp bp ❑ .'. 'd vqq ('�j aj 'd ' �, I .3 OA q ?? ,A 4 °o x ° �^ ,° u ° 6n o °� C °, v •o a h CL o a p a o v y 5 w an o a G v s bD U q ° O ('. �y }j L+ '� -d o .L" o C , N N „ N ,v, v '� '•� q N �` Q q v 'perp w O C o y y 'Fl. L 3 G n, -Z ;6 a o� o cN v o ax'o o '^ [di °.° •x - v o 0 bA 47 .-i •� Id W v1 v y cd o o o 1 vo Cdr b w0° �R N a o v o vi tb o N C14 -o o .=o o " 'n,v o c o .� •-8 .moi Cay ° a '° 'o 'T� v ti u 40' �J b"n 'v � A c� '�6" ti o " � ��+ ' .n '°' � a 4-ai-' Qv• -a t�'. i vN-i o C by u �t, H tligd p to tlG 'O p.�yr �n � N ] � � n� t•� � �p F'• '-' (per .'I. O 0 � �1 N R 0 Q. 0 H O O' CA N01 rnGy. G w C) w 1 O po w p p rt N 0 p-� o rt n n n O C4 no o cf v �H p p n o o o �. o R o CA, SB 7o UP VI N 11 f m v� a 0 m w 00 N v1 bb W o 0 3 4[ m o° pp 0 .0 o� •+ v w U °i •� v 'I7 73~ N 7 u v❑ � ° fy a 04 0 '� u O p b U p n 7 o v p. O v o° ; .5 N C o U .v � u '❑ G .LI bA N' �. y N 00.' W 0 ° p W H[ o u o o Y h' G p __�v�!! 'H l� bA� 1d C U y bA p o v. ° N .0 q p U N U u 'd 0 m w 00 N v1 bb W bll 'I7 73~ N 7 u 4 .r 04 0 '� u U 0 m w 00 N v1 bb W IT tlQ V� W V• A A m s H G� n r 111 Q ci z d cl Oli IT, C, cn o �e cwnt� �' ,°*, n o P 0.. 0n R. G '� ° '� N to H 6 0 Cr R. f D n 0 �F w 4 b. p F 5. " t. _ p . tl�a+. o' ° tlQ `C° w p' `� n w N N O On 'a v ° • q�q hiy p.. o PP- 10,A ° ° "i otlF n �- Or n m rn 0. m p G. Oq E, p P n In N n p:or, p� p 5 o H w P 0y W p'a'-�,p�.CF" m o N W w l°o o ago UQ �5 y �°• o o p m rn ry ry �• f? .ten, ao ° P rPo. ° �L+ � .a �'i '"� p N p '�' • rv'n n h7 pp� G b w w r,p C�. np�., z n h7 Z ; a y •bA o El v �A.w w v a R4 u 0... O+ q bob O y0 1v p •'d .P�� .� bAH v 4i ftl F� � t0 N L '� V 4 � � U � � � N •.''i -d V-.' p '�' o ni ca c�u •� " 0.i cd u C .Mr u v W a C N C w0 y 0 cd „q N v 0 C14 10, p k� • „bp "GbA ffi 72 �>> O D' -ly bA N CU Id q v a 7 bo w a :: u 0° c bA;q , w �e ° i°, ~ate n m v; bA w b O O ❑ C 3'J o cd 5 N N y V ti G b o cw > ° a bA . � � bAin � �, CVj •-p a� o W p v 7 F� ti Lei Hp Z ; a y •bA o El v �A.w w v a R4 u 0... O+ q bob O y0 1v p •'d .P�� .� bAH v 4i ftl F� � t0 N L '� V 4 � � U � � � N •.''i -d V-.' p '�' o ni ca c�u •� " 0.i cd u C .Mr u v W a C N C w0 y 0 cd „q N v 0 C14 10, p k� • „bp "GbA ffi 72 �>> O D' -ly bA N CU Id q v a 7 bo w a :: u 0° c bA;q , w �e ° i°, ~ate n m v; bA w w o p aa• n 0' 0•' O 0 q - o P .P awv �pG Np o W annO.rt3 H �N rt y 0"po "M 0..G ° 0 Ort UQ `^ a �° R' oUQ rt w p) q^ n H rJ 1 FC'�. w w o O N N ° V c V 0 p C„ r y �• A P. O G O w0' P G O P C nP. �: 71 n O °' J.' cr P m P- 'aa coda rt as c n p ° " O .7- ^ w o �:F' P- `C o' o ° " ° Q' p Y rt. Sr ^w^ a R- .O rt O ti r 0 m ^ w ^ w "' - n r, N O O n rt n N n O � O C. O° O o �'• ]- 0 y P-. �'ro o00 ry �i P- co 0 Pon UP N fo n n p p - n WNW o O' n ac ro aqtn. D y tj D n o ro tl4 oa y 7• o oP0.. r i-. Oc➢ P a4 rt G I n n� P- . n v,' O H 0 P-. 'V o o 0-o�9 �? o n � r� "b G 'J' �Gp `�C' n n n (n pI lD {"ry.`, N !pyo Vn p• ° "w'� Ng lA tl h U) h z V V) W Q W x O u �b z 04 v y a, C14 u O C U y d w W O G C 'y • o w Y �b03m dw -d bb w E ti vA bb W b(7 w bA W A C Y v C w v H o on •-O � q w � � bb w 00 u1 by W b 3 p.i O O 0 0 0 W v bn d q Y o •,�,� ° A o �p V 'and p v O "y 0 C 0 C •, ❑ I„ � u u y N •� W bA � 4' .� o v > 04 u O ti O v N Mc� M4 0 N a N v p 0 El•y ww w V ou u d bb w 00 u1 by W b 3 r 0 o bn d •,�,� O 6 .., >a; 7 'and p G .F$ 0 C 0 C •, ❑ I„ •^ .0 m I. 0 hr° o o n H B ��t7� �,-; aq o .]m iGy (/i M y rY \f Y ro O• Q y n w " y �'' p rt. V� � Q G Q V1 r O �-' •1 n Q n R �"• bb UQ o CI - 4,P ° a�g ww. " p baa oq Cl) y rt' `�`. '7 '"." ti P "��' n m o w P.''p vo 10 G p01p� .O 'O. w tj 04, z aq N V1 rP m tlq• it ro n N o '�r•1 � a. �' � N (nl 00 vi bb w bA W v� w bA W 1j N v � C N 4 4 ❑ .b "� N i ivi..�� 3 a o a w o❑❑ v •� 5 4 y q ti V f+ V p O 0 .0 JT -c .• 'bl, v U, 0 N w bAq w "v G1 •h bA ". U OV w H O~ y pq O p b W +�5{- v w y vW bpy 0❑ O Oa O -0 ' p 47 b4A N ,�� ° +�+ y cd 4 v O y H> q a v o d� >1 � 0 �$ �x w 6 H 3 5'y3 [ �.��� vol v• >. v an i ED� ;� '[ w w S; �j 0 0 O 'o vl -d a� H �, u bA4 ni vow '0 O �n O ctl 'd t". v �. v bA w5. v 4 v q 'U w w v[ a" u C v bA 'A "0 'w n 0.1 o` o o G• o o a' Mx ro O � ���'i "Q `G 1pi G fyD n n a Pi'° NO N O o- n �"i rt �• O C O OR N p R. �' ,nn n CIq ti n O y C� in „1y � �y�p p �• w 'O UQ 'O n P- N � A� p � �jy- ryrt W y° y ° C S, n n p n 0.n aq n Y• �., n r �., C i.° P- O rt C7 n !t p. y n � � � rt• 'y �' � H N ° n 'b rl ° n ;-1 G n p �. r� y �h 0 w O .�O 1 N Cy' o N '-t� Q ' C14 �c a ho �a a ° p Q• ° a w o o. w ° ° Com*, N .� ° ° �, ° p w °.�° p P o GpQ Tw ts a ti �O ryG {P�a ttloy pU' cr O^ (2p"�'J' o a �. rye � bd b M pH �p.. o�rv�y, „boz To e K ' N B o o° 2. p n w p C a opo �: oro o o^ N p a N m o °' ut P- O are ro. d Oee b .pi P. y o O p o . w as ° aH V p p b M R �„'° `D ° cr H rv❑ o N as a Z4 w �'°' a0 R w W p µ z aq 14 V p y a•0 u q' o vi ,ro O p bn o C ..° o Q N ; v [L' «" ,4 N z bo �A q 'Sq � � ° a .5 •� o o F .� '� � v ta y°� o [� q a 0 5 3 U ii •� > •Y.� i "u�vj o •p vbn ° v ani W •w x o ° o PQ .P,b 'dam 00 v 3 •� v) ccdd 'd 0 v n 0 y v w rev QI a n.'c a 8 .0 3 71 U y, bbon •^° g o q v N G v 4' v q'ti v °byn o � v u ° bA N g N m U bb U y ctl ,0 O y O` Iti �v U~y'Qy w °U MH yam-0yUN tilyNri' aE+q Na"N O u �vy y�q'• H a u av�'�i U 3 �p v zbo ayi q H ami v y C a"i bn tyn 0 0 " _W"' q �' C+ o 3 a w H E° a H t O a v [ v N 10 Z4 O" b0A • y a -o v' w crow o� a 3 c Q° 14. 7 v$zt 04 v v bow O .° q > u bn P> a A O o' w p 'S 0 v w° h 8y 3 -0 N o bn 0 o U-dbb 'd Ov c b"n a s 'agUJ .0 v v O p, w v •w ban G. W v 0 u 4 00 bb w qq 07 0 dry 'H'• 'FT w n 'Tl'o N 8 55') n n 71 fn H rQ 0 Hw�y} +C ao ' 0 �. � � n oy 0 !oy Po G H� 'F"� p�y v. H 'op� P P zs UQ o N A oo H ° ] H o wn ] � oy � ��, � w b aD P l7 p o dq' o- 'N N H u 0.O o O �-� N. tly3 p cY u aq �rt' Wit' ?' P- 0.w Pl `t q '�i' lU In o rt P- p cn P- N p C o'�" O r" o 'S n o �, O o a .,, o y n y G TqQ O o b H C 2 H e- y0 0. N. � �-n CoC w p- 0 rn o a, a o H Q` Z3 aq ro AUQ Ort ^' w H Oh ow 9. �� o H N aq w ry p �D o H A H on g R y p0-,0 ,yC� o, nh p �' �" N io H� y SoC O �'- anq rn. A P- o o q b w°.� a y^y wa n n rt 0 0 o a n o w o �, n ry. a. o- �D o R a aq n `O a� -< rt Q' ., p.. �C �° n ,n o `C tn ° 0a ° 0 o °� C n N O H oP h aq n w n o- w b J "o O n is :r n aq 4 a cni 'on p. `G o .�D, n on w �' n p' `JI h M 00 ,-r bb W yfl .y° N vOi q �c 7 3 bA N [ y bbD 4UQ � VO° a[0 u o. m o ° W v vRu v 5 C^off �H o ° �� ri�y� o my $•� vv v a o fl.� U ,.p�• " v u .2 w u C 3 `� bp cl `� .❑ -C!v v u E� v O cQ" p �"id ' .� v O ',_ «h vv Z Nbp o a. _o P 1 Y a„ �v w [sabp 0 -d Cam+ayn pbA !J Y°O bvyF ,v� y.bg5 o o b 0v ° , UGa bp 8 u d •'C p V1 �' b�A 6J 'O O fZ 0.�n ' �ny:j� O z04 -Cl _00 aO y p 75o w ° O A °pOD.A�vN v oy- 'r � " 0 04: v 'lY/1 (tl v Y .� Y V Y -0 �.' fd W p �v •n W y a W v N O w O u bA . Y a W q v 5 d a b" v OU 1J a W 0 w Y❑ .0 v 'w .Ii . bA C N0 G' aCl ^'° .Y aui '� g v O 5 .y, u 41 > v v a7 b py ro��d�ca `� ❑voC ° N Cl Uu .OE O v F � . L1.�❑g v .� O ~ A CNj ryq v bo p w w u N Vl bA vOi Ki N "d ..4� N O NV tV � N y t1� •• L �"! N -!p z qq Q R N G1 bb X b� w bA w "! 3 o® c o ti 3 cr > •0 yfu W d' W JC90W LL J x W W W >. V W G J x W ? OIxI- xxa� a asc ..l -a c VS -4 In aa 00 b77 w Mout�ms ViEw of Mounds View Staff' Item No: 613 Meeting Date: February 19 2014 Type of Business: Other Planning Activity To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Crossroad Pointe Development Area Discussion: On January 27, 2014, the City hosted an open house for residents to see three concept ideas that Stantec, our planning consultants, put together for the city -owned four acre site now known as "Crossroad Pointe." This open house also gave attendees a chance to comment on the three ideas, offer any other suggestions, and answer some questions about the site in general. We received the tallied results of the open house comments from the Stantec team. There was no consensus of what anyone would like to see, or not see, on the site. The next step will be for Stantec to develop concept plans that show what uses could be feasible in Mounds View, on this site. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. 3 Development Concept Ideas 2. Open house results for Crossroad Pointe Open House Concept Option Comments Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Concept 1: Primarily Residential 1. 2 votes 2. Post -it comments: a. I like this one b. No green space for residents Concept 2: Primarily Commercial 1. 4 votes 2. Post -it comments: a. Not enough play area for children b. Cut back on buildings and provide more green space c. Nice (with arrow pointing to picture of Starbucks) d. Can we make stage 1 of a downtown? e. Trails should meander. Open space needs amenity f. Too much asphalt g. More green space on corner with fountain (CR10 and H2) h. Mixed use zoning -15t story retail, 2nd & 3rd apartments i. I don't have a compelling use suggestion but we do feel strongly that the space should not be used for apartments, townhouses, or multifamily Concept 3: Mixed -Use 1. 12 votes 2. Post -it comments: a. Require underground and shared parking to limit surface lots and maximize useable green space b. Would like to see path to connect Edgewood to Hwy 10 path c. Provide green amenity space for new development that is visible to/from public ways and possibly accessible to public d. Maintain Greenfield Ave. connection to H2 or pedestrian and bike connection in its place e. No drive-thru restaurants please f. Would like to see good architecture to add good curb appeal g. Access to County 10 from parking lot would be problematic MOUNDS VIEW Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study - ® Stantec Open House Questionnaire Responses Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Motimis ytt"V Do you live, work, or own property or a business in the City of Mounds View? If so, do you live, work, or own property or a business near the Crossroad Pointe site? • Live: 11 • Work:I • Live and Work: 2 • Own Property or Business: 1 • Near Site: 13 • No:1 Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study (�l stantec Open House Questionnaire 1 Open House Challenges and Opportunities Results Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study What do you think is the best feature or opportunity for redevelopment on the Crossroad Pointe site? 1. Resident—usable/walkable-don't need to go outside Mounds View for shopping, eating, entertainment, recreation: 15 votes 2. Opportunity for multi-level, multi -use, views, social spaces, apartments, condos, retail: 9 votes 3. City willing to work with developers, which will increase tax base —lessen burden for homeowners: 6 votes 4. Close to 35W & CR10 & H2, with good access to Hwy 65 and Silver Lake Road: 5 votes 5. Good traffic counts/visual image/presentation to interest developers: 5 votes 6. Convenient to schools, shopping, & community center/midpoint for other surrounding uses: 4 votes 7. Close to TCAAP: 3 votes 8. Low crime: 3 votes and 1 negative vote 9. Significant size (4.25 acres) for redevelopment: 0 votes 10. 24-hour gathering place: 0 votes MOUNDS VIEWCrossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Stdnt@C What do you think is the biggest weakness or challenge for redevelopment on the Crossroad Pointe site? 1. Doing nothing: 9 votes 2. Access from CR10/H2 needs improvement: 8 votes 3. Greenfield Avenue cuts through property: 6 votes 4. Hiring a bad developer or a developer who doesn't do what they say they will: 6 votes 5. Size of parcel could be limiting (4.25 acres): 5 votes 6. Lack of enough surrounding commercial/retail to feed off of to support more development: 4 votes 7. Too close to residential: 2 votes 8. Diagonal roadway (CR 10) creates irregular parcel: 1 vote 9. TCAAP development will draw people away from Crossroad Pointe site: 1 vote 10. Economy could go into recession: 0 votes K" StanteC MOUNDS VIEW Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study How did you find out about the meeting tonight? • Letter from Jim Erickson: 6 • From a friend/neighbor: 6 • Email from Heidi Heller: 2 • City Facebook: 1 • City Council Member: 1 What type of development (residential, retail, office, etc.) would you LIKE to see on the Crossroad Pointe site? In other words, what would you shop at, work at, visit, or live in at this site? • Stage 1 of a long range, comprehensive plan to create a walkable downtown with amenities for people along the life span • Chiropractic wellness center • May be best to do nothing, until another commercial space is put to use along the immediate Co. Rd. 10 corridor • Mixed use of residential and commercial/office, not necessarily vertical mixed use • Include sizeable green space usable for residents, possibly public space • Maintain N/S access aligned with Greenfield; not convinced vacating street is desirable • Structured parking Please limit surface parking lots • Restaurant will blow up parking, avoid unless you have a quality tenant and long term lease • Prefer residential • I would really like a good, moderately priced restaurant -a Davanni's would be perfect • Restaurants, office • I would rather have more retail and office space. Things that close at a decent time and won't produce as much noise as Roberts did. • Greenspace, pond(s), fountain, walking path, garden. Do not over crowd. • Keep high end quick food service, i.e. Chipotle, Starbucks • Restaurant, retail • Ilike townhomes • Small restaurants—St. Paul has wonderful little shops to eat • Combination of residential and retail. Something like a Whole Foods, Trader Joe's, or the new "mini' Target • I would like mixed use—nice apartments, business, retail, restaurants, cafe, ice cream • Senior apartments are good Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study � $tanteC Open House Questionnaire 2 What type of development (residential, retail, office, etc.) would you NOT LIKE to see on the Crossroad Pointe site? In other words, what would you NOT shop at, work at, visit, or live in at this site? • Another car -centered plan, We need a pedestrian -centered design that doesn't discriminate against those without cars -children, elderly • We specifically do not want housing, certainly not high density housing that is going to flood the area with people and traffic • Fast food restaurants • Large surface parking lots • Office space OK with no retail • Senior apartments. We need to attract more young families • I'd be very cautious about an office complex. Townhome/senior living/small restaurant would be much better • 1 would rather not have multifamily. I feel that will increase crime and decrease my property value. Townhomes wouldn't be as bad. No more senior living! • No burger fast foot • No low income housing • No small retail tailored to unique markets, i.e, guitar sales, corvette store—keep more broad— floral, gift, cell phone, hair salon r • More multifamily units • No more drugstores! • No chain stores • Mounds View doesn't seem to be able to keep shops more than a few months. Please not another complex or other rental which brings in more crime • Office space does not seem to be occupied • No townhomes • No bars • No health club • No cheap apartments What other types of amenities would you like to see developed on the Crossroad Pointe site? • Underground parking to allow for more green space at ground level • Good sidewalk connections • Well-designed "front door" presence on all public streets • Park, larger community center (similar to New Brighton's Eagle Nest) • Hardware store • Park & garden for different events, weddings, farmers market, concerts • More community space. No real parks near area. No green space near area either • Seating around fountain • Many trees and gardens Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study ®StanteC Open House Questionnaire 3 • Something that can be decorated during holidays • A really nice eating place • I like storefront with apartments/condos on top General Comments? • Young families are looking for amenities. The 5 -minute walk contains the middle school grounds, movie theatre, drug stores. I especially appreciate the wide view. • Thanks for keeping the neighbors involved. • I like the idea of residential, especially if the senior living building is put in. It seems there are many vacant retail areas already. Would like to see those filled or redeveloped later on before adding more retail that could potentially sit vacant. Since so many retail facilities have failed in the past, it would be nice to see the area have a long term use. • 1 would like to see something unique with character that would stand out from the rest. Give it a small town feel. • Whatever is done, the entrance should not be on H2. When turning left from 10, if someone decides to turn in, they will stop traffic and cause potential traffic issue as cars try to clear the intersection. • Mounds View Square has become a discount haven—it attracts the wrong shoppers. Any retail store or restaurant should be run by the other chains. • Months ago I learned that Kozlaks Royal Oaks had lost its place in Arden Hills and mentioned to someone at the City (don't remember who) that City should approach Kozlak about coming to Mounds View. What a great asset. Don't think City ever followed up. • Whichever developer is chosen needs to have tenants/businesses lined up so the spaces do not sit empty. • I would like Greenfield cut off from this development—makes property larger and reduces traffic on our street. This development will directly impact our street. I am concerned about traffic & H2 intersection. H2&10 needs improvement. The angle makes it difficult to see and the light is slow going from H2 to 10. Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study _. Open House Questionnaire 4 u am c m r V) M O h 0 0 s Gz° � \�« \ ƒ] i d --- caoy Q c U .« 'r%•� 4\»\ �a � I-' _ & . ow, / ; C3E�. ƒ Gz° � \�« \ ƒ] i d --- caoy Q c U .« 'r%•� 4\»\ �a � I-' _ \ k / 6 0 0 PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting January 8, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for January 8, 2014 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Carvelli-Yu, Elofson, Love, Rundle, Birken, Schiltgen, and Stevenson. Absent and Excused: None. Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller. 3. Special Order of Business A. Oath of Office for Commissioners Planning Associate Heller administered the Oath of Office to Commissioners Gary Rundle and Jessica Runkin. B. Election of Officers — Chair and Vice -Chair Planning Associate Heller requested the Commission elect a Chair and Vice -Chair for the Planning Commission for 2014. Commissioner Rundle nominated Gary Stevenson as Chair of the Planning Commission. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Love. To elect Gary Stevenson as the Chair of the Planning Commission for 2014. Ayes — 7 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Commissioner Carvelli-Yu nominated Paul Schiltgen as Vice -Chair of the Planning Commission. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting January 8, 2014 Page 2 MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Carvelli-Yu/Chair Stevenson. To elect Paul Schiltgen as the Vice -Chair of the Planning Commission for 2014. Ayes — 7 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Index to Minutes Page Approval of Minutes 2 Review Crossroad Point Development Area Visioning Process 2 4. Approval of Minutes November 6, 2013. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Carvelli-Yu/Commissioner Schiltgen. To approve the Minutes of the November 6, 2013 regular Planning Commission meetings as presented. Ayes — 7 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 5. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. 6. Planning Cases None. 7. Other Planning Activity A. Review Crossroad Point Development Area Visioning Process (Oral Report) Planning Associate Heller discussed the Crossroad Point Development Area with the Commission. She explained the site was expanded when the City purchased the previous Taiko Restaurant and Robert's Sports Bar last year, which are adjacent to the Premium Stop lot that was already City owned. The site was approximately 4.25 acres, and the City was proposing to vacate Greenfield Street to allow the site to become one contiguous lot. The City was hoping to have a mixed use on the site in the future. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting January 8, 2014 Page 3 Associate Heller reviewed the Council's brainstorming session from a recent work session meeting regarding Mounds View's priorities and goals for the site. Strengths and weaknesses for the City and the site were discussed in detail. She commented a consultant was working with Council and staff. This consultant would be taking the comments from the recent work session meeting and would be drawing up plans for the Council to review in the future. She reported the City would be holding an Open House for the public to review these plans in the near future. Commissioner Carvelli-Yu encouraged staff to notify commercial bankers regarding the potential development options for this property. Commissioner Love suggested public comments be gathered at the proposed Open House, for Council consideration. Associate Heller agreed it would be important to gather public input. 8. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. January 22, 2014 B. February 5, 2014 9. Review Minutes: A. December 4, 2013 The Commission discussed the December 4, 2013 meeting minutes. 10. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. She reviewed the progress being made on the Coventry Senior Living project. She discussed the changes the Mounds View School District was proposing to meet the all -day kindergarten needs. The school district would be occupying a portion of Silver View Plaza for adult education and the vacant office building next to the movie theater. 11. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports None. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 12. Adjournment January 8, 2014 Page 4 There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 7:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA March 19, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: January 8, 2014 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases A. M12014-001 Minor Subdivision Applicant: Rick Beyer Address: 3033 Bronson Drive 6. Other Planning Activity A. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, April 2, 2014 B. Wednesday, April 16, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. February 19, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion MOUNDS VfE-W Item 9, 14 Meeting Date: March 1N : 5A Type of Business: Planning Case City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Consideration of a Minor Subdivision at 3033 Bronson; Planning Case M12014-001 Introduction: Rick Beyer, owner of 3033 Bronson Drive, has applied for a minor subdivision to split the lot in half. This subdivision would create one additional lot, and the applicant plans to build a house on the new vacant lot to sell. The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Survey that shows the subdivision. Discussion: A minor subdivision is a division of land less than two acres in which no more than one additional lot is created. 3033 Bronson Drive currently has a house and detached garage on the property. The house is on the west side of the lot so it can remain after the subdivision, but the garage is in the center of the lot and will need to be removed. The applicant will move the curb cut and driveway to the west side of the existing house. The lot is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential and the Comprehensive Plan designates this area for low density residential. Both of the new lots are interior lots. The minimum lot width for interior residential parcels is 75 feet and the minimum lot area is 11,000 square feet, and corner lots must be a minimum of 100 feet wide and 12,500 square feet. Below is a table which shows the dimensions and square footage for the parcels before and as a result of the proposed subdivision: As this table shows, the proposed lots still exceed all city standards. Park Dedication Requirements. Subdivisions of land are subject to park dedication requirements consistent with Chapter 1204 of the City Code. Staff suggests the park dedication fee be based only on the land value of the new vacant lot since there has been a house at 3033 Bronson Drive since 1947. For minor subdivisions the park dedication fee is typically 5% of the current year market value as determined by Ramsey County. In this case for 2013, the land value per square foot is $1.57 x 19,096 sq. feet = $29,981 x 5% = $1,499 park dedication fee. The City Council will make the final determination on the park dedication fee amount. This fee must be paid prior to the City giving the applicant the approved documentation for recording with Ramsey County. Before Area Sq. Feet After Area Sq. feet Parcel A 38,197 square feet 19,101 square feet 0.8769 acres 0.4385 acres 159.7'x 240' 79.85'x 240' Parcel B NA 19,096 square feet 0.4384 acres 79.85'x 240' As this table shows, the proposed lots still exceed all city standards. Park Dedication Requirements. Subdivisions of land are subject to park dedication requirements consistent with Chapter 1204 of the City Code. Staff suggests the park dedication fee be based only on the land value of the new vacant lot since there has been a house at 3033 Bronson Drive since 1947. For minor subdivisions the park dedication fee is typically 5% of the current year market value as determined by Ramsey County. In this case for 2013, the land value per square foot is $1.57 x 19,096 sq. feet = $29,981 x 5% = $1,499 park dedication fee. The City Council will make the final determination on the park dedication fee amount. This fee must be paid prior to the City giving the applicant the approved documentation for recording with Ramsey County. 3033 Bronson Subdivision Staff Report March 19, 2014 Page 2 Easements. With most subdivisions, the City requires the owner to dedicate drainage and utility easements around the perimeter of the lot. These easements (10 foot front and rear, 5 foot sides) are shown on the survey. Public Notice. No public notice is required for a minor subdivision but staff mailed letters to all adjoining property owners to notify them of the subdivision request. Summary. The proposed subdivision will split 3033 Bronson Drive into two parcels. All minimum City requirements are met with this request. Recommendation: Because the proposed subdivision satisfies all city code requirements, Staff is recommending approval of Resolution 997-14, a resolution approving the minor subdivision of 3033 Bronson Drive, owned by Rick Beyer. Respectfully Submitted By, Cm lc4--� Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Certificate of Survey 4. Resolution 997-14 Zoning Map C"Nr74974 40 N t oM74 I 7630 7624 IW 7611 I>� 7614 7604 7584 ID 7581 7564 7555 7546 545 7538 11525 II M �p p 7380 7375 o O 7347 ®R SON o¢OpM C"Nr74974 40 N t oM74 7462 57 7447 7448 - 745 7425 7430 7415 740 7385 7380 7375 i 7365 7347 7350 7365 T732 732 CO u�r IlZodd 2 O 34 O n r7 M M M K) M z T 7655 7633 7629 7627 7581 7565 7555 [NO 7666 L7647 7664 7629 76201 17625 N I N 17500 7579 7555 7545 7515 to N N 7489 C"Nr74974 40 7465 54 � - 745 7445 7435 7434 7405 7412 7381 7382 7360 i 7365 7347 34 T732 337 r7 M N N n rn N N N N N 0Of 1 N 7 7 f 17 J- - . rI I� , N -t I to1 001 O * Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential 7, 7 7 7 7 7 a Survev 5i; �•i s igi! fl;�r a;EB y5f5 "aeaial iaia 4ii il,.BjiFenA�std q3S 6i��,�ii p� F�zfi; sof' 3i''is3Li ti! �aafY <f;4 •Srdi °is -ir Ar �•6a irj 7'ii ei. E rlii =-ih ~i3.i! ;ial2 qe"? di 5 ���be�'.rgai�.geifi-l`. aFi��te�EiFF{i.• lji?s!�i§i ,xifiis-i5af13Sr3iq5i•i1iaSi ��� �@�� ... ..UN, 1110 I I I � Y6i a e 33 S zi Its i i "➢ So H gg Y e•• d 7 . --_=— iLi f p i 8 I e 5ili S d z .� �,:.. d ,. • J x Q � ! f e ! N i Ci� - �r59° ' � ef� $a'- �Ip �a, •'ISI ��ij� �(i41�4 •1�q 61 i o � ii3 :� i e C �i I'� �iiiilii g•° - `•+s,,. ai, Ps. ". 565 -� � II iC 14 iii I + :gf i5 • a5 'id _ I � xie iY a �i _ -�-� d i1AisA' r xg ! s kryp 5 sPY CpSp¢ f y{ O gg ggigi 8 q ��++ Q 6 Qla 31r :2 YC ePb; A i " @[§jTa -C qY fl! " E..1 m 3 i9 vt � e/ , __ L9 b' @ Eaa:g§g �ya x qq i � e p pp € 4 q•§ z3„ ie _ �-e �"•� aes5 re $,r i� i C' i §add 9 e9aexE-slit° s a' yag5srpe$A g4 S x�8' q U B e[u 114[ Fi 4k'3@3tl a Ce 5F� ga 65 ii3p Ai 3 r_ S:Ftl3ESy �YiF apz-kq -Ce`k 3fl3ta 3a9l3i„>l £ a a er O�itlP�``.§iR F gg pg; pWp�3 "1_ V n >ii3 p 1 59: 'ii<E �eN Al9�i F � � W U: MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 997-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINOR SUBDIVISION OF 3033 BRONSON DRIVE; PLANNING CASE NO. M12014-001 WHEREAS, Richard Beyer, has requested approval of a minor subdivision to split 3033 Bronson Drive into two parcels; and, WHEREAS, the property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and legally - described as: The East Half of Lots 61 and 62, Spring Lake Park Knolls Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota PIN 07-30-23-22-0035 WHEREAS, the Applicant proposes to subdivide 3033 Bronson Drive into two lots; the west lot will include the existing house, and the east lot will be vacant; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Applicant's request for a minor subdivision and has determined that it is in conformance with Chapters 1104, 1201, and 1202 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Applicant's request for a minor subdivision is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 1204.04, Subd. 4 of the Municipal Code, a park dedication fee will be required, with the amount to be determined by the City Council, based on the 2013 Ramsey County assessed market land value. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Applicant shall have 6 months from final approval to file proper documentation with Ramsey County, including new deeds and easement documents, and furnish proof of such recording to the City. If such action is not accomplished by the date so indicated, this minor subdivision approval shall be considered null and void. Resolution 997-14 Paye 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the minor subdivision of 3033 Bronson Drive subject to the following stipulations: 1. The Applicant shall complete any and all requirements after final review of the Certificate of Survey and title commitment by the City Attorney. 2. The Applicant shall arrange to amend the Certificate of Survey if any changes are required by Ramsey County. 3. The Applicant shall pay to the City, a park dedication fee and all other fees associated with this subdivision request. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 19th day of March, 2014. Paul Schiltgen, Vice Chairperson ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) MOvrmS ViEv of Mounds View Staff Item No: 6A Meeting Date: March 19, 2014 Type of Business: Other Planning Activity To: Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion The corridor continues to be the City Council's priority and the Planning Commission has been reviewing the Zoning Code in order to better promote and accommodate development along County Road 10. The Commission has been discussing creating a Corridor Overlay District in order to give more flexibility to new development projects on the corridor. The City is willing to be flexible on requirements such as setbacks, parking, density and height, but the City also wants projects that are high quality. A beginning draft of the overlay district language is attached for discussion, along with a good description of overlay district ordinances. Recommendation Continue the discussion about a County Road 10 Corridor District Overlay and review the proposed language for the district. Sincerely, Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Attachment: 1. Description of Overlay District Ordinances 2. Proposed language for County Road 10 overlay district OVERLAY DISTRICT ORDINANCES Purpose of Tool: Overlay Districts provide a means to incorporate various development regulations across a specified area. These districts are special zones that lie on top of existing zoning categories to supplement or supersede existing regulations. They usually provide a higher level of regulation than that required by the existing zoning classification, but they can also permit exceptions or require a less -restrictive guideline. In cases where conflicting standards are given by an overlay district and the underlying zoning category, those of the overlay district take priority. The boundaries of an overlay district may or may not coincide with the boundaries of the underlying zone, and an overlay district may contain parts of more than one existing zone. Overlay districts are used to accomplish a variety of development, transportation, and land use goals such as access management, protection of historic or natural resources, safety, standardization of a historic district, implementation of development guidelines, protection of the quality of surface water, and even special taxing or financing for an area. Overlay districts often complement a jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Benefits of Using Tool: Overlay districts are particularly useful to communities and municipalities because they allow existing zoning requirements to be superseded, when needed. Overlay districts can be implemented by passing a law that appends existing land use regulations, without having to go through the process of rewriting the underlying zoning requirements/regulations. Communities can also modify overlay districts without difficulty, should they decide to modify the requirements or coverage area. Overlay Districts can accomplish the following elements: • Provide design guidelines that create a particular look and feel of an area • Protect valuable resources • Help meet goals and objectives of the community • Maintain certain current codes while addressing a special need of a particular area within a zone(s) Steps Involved to Use Tool: To be implemented, an overlay district typically follows this process: • A study or report is compiled that details the purpose and goals of the overlay district, and ensures that it is tied to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan or the stated goals of the community. • The boundary is simply and clearly defined, which is known as "spatial definition." • Applicant information is compiled into a formal application to demonstrate the need for the overlay district. • The community's reviewing body (typically a review board comprised of citizens and/or planning staff, or possibly the planning commission) evaluates for compliance with current standards. • The local governing body (City Council) must approve the application before it is voted on. Special Requirements to Use Tool: The primary requirement for using an overlay district is that there must be a zoning ordinance in place prior to implementation. Quite simply, if there is no zoning to be overlaid, an overlay district is not possible. Additionally, there must also be a clear and defensible purpose for implementing the overlay district such as stated goals and objectives from a local plan or study. Specials Resources Needed to Use Tool: Because of the review process necessary to implement and manage an overlay district, this tool is best suited for communities or agencies that have an adequate professional planning staff. Typically, interpretation of technical issues associated with the application and overlay ordinance requirements is required; therefore an experienced planner on staff would be beneficial. Metrics to Use to Monitor Tool Effectiveness: Because there is such a wide variety of the types of overlay districts that can be implemented, the ways to measure their performance are also widespread. For example, for districts whose purpose is to regulate a particular "look and feel" for corridors or communities, set design standards, as well as oversight in the plan review process, are essential in ensuring that the objectives of the overlay district are met. Quantitative elements can also be monitored for success through implementation of the overlay ordinance, including the following examples: lot size, building height and area, parking, number of access points (or consolidation of access points), and types of land uses. PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR COUNTY ROAD 10 OVERLAY DISTRICT 1120.03 Subd. 4. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District a. Purpose: The purpose of this District is to provide standards of development for land lying on either side of the major transportation corridor along County Road 10. The County Road 10 Corridor District is the primary gateway through the City. The aesthetic impacts from new developments and redevelopments must be evaluated to help ensure the long-term viability and success of the District. Accomplishing the purpose of the County Road 10 Corridor District requires particular concern for the site layout, building materials, site features and other related design elements. To that end, new development and redevelopment shall conform to the standards in this and related zoning requirements. In reviewing and approving land use applications, the City Council shall make the final determination in the compatibility and consistency with all provisions in this and related sections of the Zoning Ordinance. b. Overlay Area Defined: The following area is hereby established as being within the County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District: (1) All parcels that have frontage on County Road 10, (2) All parcels that are within 200 feet of the County Road 10 right-of-way, (3) The City may determine that a specific development area will not benefit from the overlay district and can exclude that project area from the district requirements. c. Permitted Uses: The overlay district provisions apply to any base zoning district set forth in this Title that exists within the defined overlay area. d. Standards: For development of properties within the County Road 10 overlay district, the following standards shall be applied where such standards supersede requirements set forth in the B-1 (Neighborhood Business), B-2 (Limited Business), B-3 (Highway Business), and B-4 (Regional Business) zoning districts. All other standards and requirements of the above- mentioned zoning districts shall continue to apply. (1) Construction Materials: (a) At least fifty (50) percent of all exterior wall finishes on any building shall be comprised of a combination of at least two of the following materials: • Brick • Natural stone • Glass • Masonry stucco • Other comparable or superior material as approved by the City 1 (b) The remaining fifty (50) percent of all exterior wall finishes shall be comprised of any combination of decorative or rock face concrete block, concrete panels, metal or wood. All building materials subject to approval of the City. (c) Buildings may be constructed of primarily one of the materials listed in Subd. 4d (1)(a), if the design exceeds the intent of the ordinance. (d) Non -decorative exposed concrete block buildings are prohibited, as are pre-engineered metal buildings, corrugated metal -sided buildings, and wood sided buildings unless such metal buildings and wood sided buildings are enhanced on all elevations by the application of brick, decorative masonry, or decorative stucco surfaces in combination with decorative fascia overhangs and trim. (2) Architectural Design: Each building will be reviewed for at least the following considerations: (a) Appropriate location of structures on the site with relationship to other site amenities, restrictions, adjacent land usage, etc. (b) General massing, roof treatments, proportion and quality of exterior. (c) In the design of buildings or clusters of buildings, developers should orient projects so that the side(s) facing County Road 10 form the front of the project. Where front toward County Road 10 is not feasible due to the location of access roads and other site constraints, the project should be oriented and designed in such a manner so as to convey a pleasing appearance from County Road 10. (d) Screening of mechanical equipment, tanks, loading docks, refuse handling, ancillary equipment, etc., whether on the roof or on the site. (e) Drainage pipes on exterior building walls facing a street and/or County Road 10 must be integral to the design and non - apparent. (f) Exceptions to the architectural design standards set forth in this section may be granted by the City Administrator or designee, for structures of comparable design and building materials. (3) Building and Parking Setback Requirements: The City requires that buildings and/or parking lots have no more than a five (5) foot setback from County Road 10. The required setbacks for the other sides of the property will be determined by the City, based on the specific project and land usage. K (4) Off -Street Parking: The City will use the off-street parking requirements in Chapter 1121.13 as a guideline, and base the final determination of required spaces on the specific project and land usage. (5) Landscaping: (a) Landscaping requirements shall be in accordance with Chapter 1127, Tree Preservation and Landscaping. (b) A minimum of fifteen (15) percent of the total area of each lot shall be devoted to landscaped open space. (c) All open areas of any lot not used for parking, driveways, or storage shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, berms and planted ground cover. (6) Signs: In accordance with Chapter 1010. (7) Outdoor Storage and Dumpster Screening: (a) No outdoor storage shall be permitted unless such storage is visually screened from view from County Road 10 and all adjoining residential properties, with suitable solid fence constructed of masonry or wood at least six (6) feet in height. Screening shall be well maintained. (b) No dumpsters may be located on the sides of buildings fronting County Road 10, except if in the opinion of the City no other suitable location is reasonably available for such purpose, and provided the dumpster area is developed in a manner so as to minimize it's appearance from County Road 10. (c) All dumpsters shall be entirely screened by a masonry or solid wooden fence, with gate, or a comparable screening, at least six (6) feet in height. (8) Existing Uses and Structures: Uses and structures in this District that were conforming prior to the effective date of this Ordinance will remain conforming upon adoption of this Ordinance. AND....... New standards effective upon adoption of this Ordinance per the County Road 10 Overlay District shall be applied to building additions/expansions and new development under building permits issued after the effective date of this Ordinance, except as may otherwise be provided for under the provisions of this Chapter. 3 All subsequent additions, exterior alteration and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building after the date of adoption of this ordinance, shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and appearance and meet all other standards set forth in this ordinance. CTS Where additions are proposed for buildings constructed prior to the effective date of this Ordinance and such buildings do not comply with the standards in this section, such additions need not comply with the standards in this section as long as the addition(s) are not in excess of fifty (50) percent of the existing floor area of the existing building. Any additions in excess of fifty (50) percent of the existing floor area of the existing building constructed prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, shall comply with the standards in this Section. 0 PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting February 19,2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for February 19, 2014. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Birken, Carvelli-Yu, Elofson, Love, Rundle, Schiltgen, and Stevenson. Absent and Excused: None. Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller. i Index to Minutes Page Approval of Minutes 1 County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion 2 Review Crossroad Pointe Development Area Visioning Process 3 3. Approval of Minutes December 4, 2013. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Love/Commissioner Caivelli-Yu. To approve the Minutes of the December 4, 2013 regular Planning Commission meeting as slightly amended. Ayes — 7 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting February 19,2014 Page 2 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. 5. Planning Cases None. 6. Other Planning Activity A. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay Discussion Planning Associate Heller informed the Commission that the corridor continues to be the Council's priority and the Commission has been reviewing the Zoning Code in order to better promote and accommodate redevelopment along County Road 10. The City would like to enhance the corridor in such a manner that it is promoting and supporting development. The City has looked into mowing the median along the corridor more frequently along with repainting the signal lights. She reported the Commission amended the City Code to change the requirements for ground signs on properties that are on the corridor. Associate Heller explained that this amendment lowered the allowable heights for signs and requires higher quality design materials, along with allowing the signs to be closer to County Road 10. Discussion on this topic began by creating a Corridor Overlay District in order to give more flexibility to new projects on the corridor. The City would be flexible on requirements such as setbacks, parking, density and height, but the City also wants projects that are high quality. Associate Heller discussed how the new Crossroad Pointe development would fit into the County Road 10 corridor, along with the large amount of right-of-way along County Road 10. She stated the Commission may need to consider reducing setbacks within the overlay district. Proposed setbacks were reviewed in detail with the Commission. She further discussed the benefits of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process. She commented exterior building materials or design criteria could be addressed within an overlay district to assist the City in improving the look and appeal of the corridor. Associate Heller reviewed the proposed language for the Corridor Overlay District, stating all properties along the County Road 10 would be included, in addition to properties within 200 feet or the roadway. She wanted the Commission to focus on architectural elements and building materials at its next meeting. Discussion ensued regarding County Road 96 and the vast improvements that have been made to improve this corridor. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting February 19, 2014 Page 3 Commissioner Love was in favor of additional plantings being considered along the County Road 10 corridor. She supported tree plantings in the median as well. Associate Heller did not believe tree plantings would be allowed. B. Review Crossroad Pointe Development Area Visioning Process Planning Associate Heller informed the Commission that on January 27, 2014 the City hosted an open house for residents to see three concept ideas that Stantec put together for the City -owned four -acre site known as Crossroad Pointe. The open house gave attendees a chance to comment on the three ideas, offer suggestions and answer questions about the site. She reported that Stantec was currently compiling the information gathered from the public and would be developing concept plans that show the City what uses could be feasible in Mounds View, for this site. Commissioner Love asked if the City had an increased need for housing, based on the requests from Met Council. Associate Heller stated rental vacancy rates were extremely low in Mounds View. The units in Mounds View were very affordable. She reported there was a growing need for higher -end apartments. She discussed how the redevelopment of TCAAP would increase traffic in and around the Mounds View area. Commissioner Love was encouraged that the City was visioning for this property, as it would assist in improving the overall corridor. Commissioner Schiltgen saw the Crossroad Pointe site as being commercial space and not residential. Commissioner Elofson was in favor of this being developed into doctor's offices. Commissioner Birken wanted to see additional restaurants brought into Mounds View. Associate Heller stated it was difficult for Mounds View to attract restaurants when competing with Northtown, Highway 65 and the redevelopment taking place in Shoreview. She stated she would report back to the Commission after further information had been received from Stantec. 7. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. March 5, 2014 B. March 19, 2014 Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 8. Review Minutes: A. January 8,2014 The Commission discussed the January 8, 2014 meeting minutes. 9. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases February 19, 2014 Page 4 Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases, noting the March 5, 2014 Planning Commission meeting would be canceled. She reported Coventry was close to closing on their lots and anticipated work would begin this spring. She discussed the new tenants in Silver View Plaza noting the building was almost full. She explained the Town Hall Meeting would be held on Monday, March 31, 2014. 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports None. 11. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 8:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA April 2, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: February 19, 2014 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases ►raw 6. Other Planning Activity A. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, April 16, 2014 B. Wednesday, May 7, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. March 19, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion 4 of Mounds View Staff Item No: 6A Meeting Date: April 2, 2014 Type of Business: Other Planning Activity To: Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion The corridor continues to be the City Council's priority and the Planning Commission has been reviewing the Zoning Code in order to better promote and accommodate development along County Road 10. The Commission has been discussing creating a Corridor Overlay District in order to give more flexibility to new development projects on the corridor. The City is willing to be flexible on requirements such as setbacks, parking, density and height, but the City also wants projects that are high quality. A beginning draft of the overlay district language is attached for discussion, along with a good description of overlay district ordinances. Recommendation Continue the discussion about a County Road 10 Corridor District Overlay and review the proposed language for the district. Sincerely, Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Attachment: 1. Description of Overlay District Ordinances 2. Proposed language for County Road 10 overlay district OVERLAY DISTRICT ORDINANCES Purpose of Tool: Overlay Districts provide a means to incorporate various development regulations across a specified area. These districts are special zones that lie on top of existing zoning categories to supplement or supersede existing regulations. They usually provide a higher level of regulation than that required by the existing zoning classification, but they can also permit exceptions or require a less -restrictive guideline. In cases where conflicting standards are given by an overlay district and the underlying zoning category, those of the overlay district take priority. The boundaries of an overlay district may or may not coincide with the boundaries of the underlying zone, and an overlay district may contain parts of more than one existing zone. Overlay districts are used to accomplish a variety of development, transportation, and land use goals such as access management, protection of historic or natural resources, safety, standardization of a historic district, implementation of development guidelines, protection of the quality of surface water, and even special taxing or financing for an area. Overlay districts often complement a jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Benefits of Using Tool: Overlay districts are particularly useful to communities and municipalities because they allow existing zoning requirements to be superseded, when needed. Overlay districts can be implemented by passing a law that appends existing land use regulations, without having to go through the process of rewriting the underlying zoning requirements/regulations. Communities can also modify overlay districts without difficulty, should they decide to modify the requirements or coverage area. Overlay Districts can accomplish the following elements: • Provide design guidelines that create a particular look and feel of an area • Protect valuable resources • Help meet goals and objectives of the community • Maintain certain current codes while addressing a special need of a particular area within a zone(s) Steps Involved to Use Tool: To be implemented, an overlay district typically follows this process: • A study or report is compiled that details the propose and goals of the overlay district, and ensures that it is tied to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan or the stated goals of the community. • The boundary is simply and clearly defined, which is known as "spatial definition." • Applicant information is compiled into a formal application to demonstrate the need for the overlay district. • The community's reviewing body (typically a review board comprised of citizens and/or planning staff, or possibly the planning commission) evaluates for compliance with current standards. • The local governing body (City Council) must approve the application before it is voted on. Special Requirements to Use Tool: The primary requirement for using an overlay district is that there must be a zoning ordinance in place prior to implementation. Quite simply, if there is no zoning to be overlaid, an overlay district is not possible. Additionally, there must also be a clear and defensible purpose for implementing the overlay district such as stated goals and objectives from a local plan or study. Specials Resources Needed to Use Tool: Because of the review process necessary to implement and manage an overlay district, this tool is best suited for communities or agencies that have an adequate professional planning staff. Typically, interpretation of technical issues associated with the application and overlay ordinance requirements is required; therefore an experienced planner on staff would be beneficial. Metrics to Use to Monitor Tool Effectiveness: Because there is such a wide variety of the types of overlay districts that can be implemented, the ways to measure their performance are also widespread. For example, for districts whose purpose is to regulate a particular "look and feel" for corridors or communities, set design standards, as well as oversight in the plan review process, are essential in ensuring that the objectives of the overlay district are met. Quantitative elements can also be monitored for success through implementation of the overlay ordinance, including the following examples: lot size, building height and area, parking, number of access points (or consolidation of access points), and types of land uses. PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR COUNTY ROAD 10 OVERLAY DISTRICT i 1120.03 Subd. 4. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District a. Purpose: The purpose of this District is to provide standards of development for land lying on either side of the major transportation corridor along County Road 10. The County Road 10 Corridor District is the primary gateway through the City. The aesthetic impacts from new developments and redevelopments must be evaluated to help ensure the long-term viability and success of the District. Accomplishing the purpose of the County Road 10 Corridor District requires particular concern for the site layout, building materials, site features and other related design elements. To that end, new development and redevelopment shall conform to the standards in this and related zoning requirements. In reviewing and approving land use applications, the City Council shall make the final determination in the compatibility and consistency with all provisions in this and related sections of the Zoning Ordinance. b. Overlay Area Defined: The following area is hereby established as being within the County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District: (1) All parcels that have frontage on County Road 10, (2) All parcels that are within 200 feet of the County Road 10 right-of-way, (3) The City may determine that a specific development area will not benefit from the overlay district and can exclude that project area from the district requirements. c. Permitted Uses: The overlay district provisions apply to any base zoning district set forth in this Title that exists within the defined overlay area. d. Standards: For development of properties within the County Road 10 overlay district, the following standards shall be applied where such standards supersede requirements set forth in the B-1 (Neighborhood Business), B-2 (Limited Business), B-3 (Highway Business), and B-4 (Regional Business) zoning districts. All other standards and requirements of the above- mentioned zoning districts shall continue to apply. (1) Construction Materials: (a) At least fifty (50) percent of all exterior wall finishes on any building shall be comprised of a combination of at least two of the following materials: • Brick • Natural stone • Glass • Masonry stucco • Other comparable or superior material as approved by the City 1 (b) The remaining fifty (50) percent of all exterior wall finishes shall be comprised of any combination of decorative or rock face concrete block, concrete panels, metal or wood. All building materials subject to approval of the City. (c) Buildings may be constructed of primarily one of the materials listed in Subd. 4d (1)(a), if the design exceeds the intent of the ordinance. (d) Non -decorative exposed concrete block buildings are prohibited, as are pre-engineered metal buildings, corrugated metal -sided buildings, and wood sided buildings unless such metal buildings and wood sided buildings are enhanced on all elevations by the application of brick, decorative masonry, or decorative stucco surfaces in combination with decorative fascia overhangs and trim. (2) Architectural Design: Each building will be reviewed for at least the following considerations: (a) Appropriate location of structures on the site with relationship to other site amenities, restrictions, adjacent land usage, etc. (b) General massing, roof treatments, proportion and quality of exterior. (c) In the design of buildings or clusters of buildings, developers should orient projects so that the side(s) facing County Road 10 form the front of the project. Where front toward County Road 10 is not feasible due to the location of access roads and other site constraints, the project should be oriented and designed in such a manner so as to convey a pleasing appearance from County Road 10. (d) Screening of mechanical equipment, tanks, loading docks, refuse handling, ancillary equipment, etc., whether on the roof or on the site. (e) Drainage pipes on exterior building walls facing a street and/or County Road 10 must be integral to the design and non - apparent. (f) Exceptions to the architectural design standards set forth in this section may be granted by the City Administrator or designee, for structures of comparable design and building materials. (3) Building and Parking Setback Requirements: The City requires that buildings and/or parking lots have no more than a five (5) foot setback from County Road 10. The required setbacks for the other sides of the property will be determined by the City, based on the specific project and land usage. 2 (4) Off -Street Parking: The City will use the off-street parking requirements in Chapter 1121.13 as a guideline, and base the final determination of required spaces on the specific project and land usage. (5) Landscaping: (a) Landscaping requirements shall be in accordance with Chapter 1127, Tree Preservation and Landscaping. (b) A minimum of fifteen (15) percent of the total area of each lot shall be devoted to landscaped open space. (c) All open areas of any lot not used for parking, driveways, or storage shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, berms and planted ground cover. (6) Signs: In accordance with Chapter 1010. (7) Outdoor Storage and Dumpster Screening: (a) No outdoor storage shall be permitted unless such storage is visually screened from view from County Road 10 and all adjoining residential properties, with suitable solid fence constructed of masonry or wood at least six (6) feet in height. Screening shall be well maintained. (b) No dumpsters may be located on the sides of buildings fronting County Road 10, except if in the opinion of the City no other suitable location is reasonably available for such purpose, and provided the dumpster area is developed in a manner so as to minimize it's appearance from County Road 10. (c) All dumpsters shall be entirely screened by a masonry or solid wooden fence, with gate, or a comparable screening, at least six (6) feet in height. (8) Existing Uses and Structures: Uses and structures in this District that were conforming prior to the effective date of this Ordinance will remain conforming upon adoption of this Ordinance. AND....... New standards effective upon adoption of this Ordinance per the County Road 10 Overlay District shall be applied to building additions/expansions and new development under building permits issued after the effective date of this Ordinance, except as may otherwise be provided for under the provisions of this Chapter. 101 3 All subsequent additions, exterior alteration and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building after the date of adoption of this ordinance, shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and appearance and meet all other standards set forth in this ordinance. Where additions are proposed for buildings constructed prior to the effective date of this Ordinance and such buildings do not comply with the standards in this section, such additions need not comply with the standards in this section as long as the addition(s) are not in excess of fifty (50) percent of the existing floor area of the existing building. Any additions in excess of fifty (50) percent of the existing floor area of the existing building constructed prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, shall comply with the standards in this Section. rd PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting Mareb 19, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Schiltgen at 7:00 p.m. for March 19, 2014. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Birken, Carvelli-Yu, Elofson, Love, Rundle, and Schiltgen. Absent and Excused: Commissioner Stevenson. Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller. Index to Minutes Page Approval of Minutes 1 MI2014-001 Minor Subdivision for Rick Beyer at 3033 Bronson Drive 2 County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion 3 3. Approval of Minutes January 8, 2014. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Carvelli-Yu/Commissioner Elofson. To approve the Minutes of the January 8, 2014 regular Planning Commission meeting as slightly amended. Ayes — 6 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. 5. Planning Cases A. MI2014-001 Minor Subdivision Applicant: Rick Beyer Address: 3033 Bronson Drive March 19, 2014 Page 2 Planning Associate Heller explained that Rick Beyer, the new owner of 3033 Bronson Drive, has applied for a minor subdivision to split the lot in half. This subdivision would create one additional lot, and the applicant plans to build a house on the new vacant lot to sell. The applicant has provided staff with a Certificate of Survey showing the proposed subdivision. It was noted the applicant would be responsible for paying the City a $1,500 park dedication fee for the new lot. As the proposed request meets all City Code requirements, Staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision. Vice Chair Schiltgen asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak about the case. Commissioner Carvelli-Yu questioned when the new home would be built. Rick Beyer, 3033 Bronson Drive, explained he did not have a strict timeline. He reported he was working on completing the lot split at this time. He would then be busy renovating the old house. Bill Doty, 3049 Bronson Drive, explained he lived adjacent subject property. He asked how the new driveway would be aligned. Mr. Beyer explained how the driveway would be realigned on the property on the west side of the house. Al Cleland, 3025 Bronson Drive, thanked staff for the information provided on this planning case. He requested that the nature of the neighborhood be maintained. He expressed concern with the water that ponded to the rear of the subject property. Mr. Beyer commented he was not going to build a huge house and that it would not stick out from the surrounding homes. Associate Heller explained that any drainage from the new house must remain on the property and would be addressed when the property was graded after construction.. Commissioner Love asked if there was enough room to build a garage on the west side of the house. Mounds View Planning Commission March 19, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 3 Mr. Beyer commented there was approximately 33 feet of open space on the west property line. Commissioner Birken encouraged the applicant to save as many trees as possible on the property. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Carvelli-Yu. To approve Resolution 997-14, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Minor Subdivision for Rick Beyer at 3033 Bronson Drive; Planning Case No. MI2014-001. Ayes — 6 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 6. Other Planning Activity A. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion Planning Associate Heller informed the Commission that the corridor continues to be the Council's priority and the Planning Commission has been reviewing the Zoning Code in order to better promote and accommodate development along County Road 10. She explained the Commission has been discussing creating a Corridor Overlay District in order to give more flexibility to new development projects on the corridor. The City is willing to be flexible on requirements such as setbacks, parking, density and height, but the City also wants projects that are high quality. Staff reviewed proposed language for an overlay district Ordinance with the Commission and requested comments and suggestions. Commissioner Birken explained that she did not receive a copy of the draft Ordinance language within her packet. Associate Heller provided each of the Commissioners with a copy of the draft language and suggested this item be continued to the April 2, 2014 meeting for further discussion. 7. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. April 2, 2014 B. April 16, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. February 19,2014 The Commission discussed the February 19, 2014 meeting minutes and made no changes. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 9. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases March 19, 2014 Page 4 Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. She congratulated Gary Stevenson for being appointed Citizen of the Year for 2013. She reported there would be a groundbreaking ceremony for Coventry Senior Living on March 24, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports Vice Chair Schiltgen applauded the City on the fine work that has been completed through the Street and Utility Program. 11. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Vice Chair Schiltgen adjourned the meeting at 7:33 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA April 16, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: March 19, 2014 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases A. MU2014-001-CU-1 Conditional Use Permit for an Oversize Garage MU2014-001-VR-1 Variance for a Reduced Driveway Setback Applicant: Chuck Pelton Address: 8312 Red Oak Drive 6. Other Planning Activity A. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, May 7, 2014 B. Wednesday, May 21, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. April 2, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion MOUND�T Item No: 5A S VIEW Meeting Date: April 16, 2014 Type of Business: Planning Case City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing - Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Garage & Variance for a Reduced Driveway Setback at 8312 Red Oak Drive; Planning Case MU2014-001 Introduction: The applicant, Chuck Pelton, is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for an oversize detached garage and a variance for a reduced driveway setback on his property at 8312 Red Oak Drive. The applicant wants to expand his house by attaching the existing detached garage and turning it into living space. He then plans to build a new 1,800 square foot garage (30'w'x 60'd) behind the house with a driveway. The applicant has submitted plans for a garage larger than what the City Code allows without a conditional use permit. The City limits the size of accessory buildings, whether attached or detached from the house, to a maximum of 952 square feet. Any single building larger than 952 square feet must get City approval of a conditional use permit. The garage the applicant is proposing would be 1,800 square feet. The applicant will also be installing a driveway that connects to the existing driveway and leads to the new garage in the backyard. This driveway will run past the house and be closer than five feet to the property line so the applicant has requested a reduced driveway setback variance. Conditional Use Permit Discussion Requirements: Section 1106.03, Subd. 1: This part of the Code limits the height of an accessory building, the number of accessory buildings, the backyard coverage ratio of accessory buildings and specifies roof style and pitch. A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required for garages exceeding 952 square feet. Section 1106.04, Subd. 6: This part of the Code enumerates the conditions for garages exceeding 952 square feet. The garage must be permanent, be uniform in appearance with the home, not exceed 35 feet in width, and not exceed 1,800 square feet of total accessory building area on the lot. Section 1125.01, Subd. 1: The Planning Commission is required to review the possible adverse effects of the requested conditional use. Discussion: The request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct the 1,800 square foot garage satisfies the requirements as stated in Section 1106.03 and 1106.04, Subdivision 6 of the Mounds View Zoning Code. The proposed garage meets all City setback and accessory building coverage requirements. The City Code limits backyard building coverage to 20% of the yard area. The new 1,800 square foot garage would cover approximately 13% of the backyard area. 8312 Red Oak CUP & VR Request April 16, 2014 Page 2 CUP Considerations: Chapter 1125 of the Zoning Code requires that the Planning Commission review and address any potential adverse effects of a conditional use that include, but are not limited to, the relationship with the Comprehensive Plan, geographical area involved, potential depreciation, the character of the surrounding area and the demonstrated need for such a use. Staff has addressed each of these potential adverse effects below. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as low-density residential, as well as the surrounding area. The Comp Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential property in general. With this project, the applicant would be significantly improving the property value with the house remodel and expansion, along with a new large garage. The Geographical Area Involved. The applicant's home is located on a large lot in a single family residential area on Red Oak Drive, at the north end of the city. Depreciation. The proposed garage would benefit the subject property both in a practical sense by providing additional indoor storage, as well as in an economic sense, as the addition would increase the "value" of the property. Increased property values are a benefit to everyone. The Character of the Surrounding Area. The applicant's neighborhood is entirely single-family residential. The homes in this area are a variety of styles and ages, but the immediate area properties all have larger, half -acre size lots. The look of the front of the house will be changing with the remodeling, but the new garage in the backyard will not be very visible from the street. This is a larger property at 97 feet wide and 264 feet deep (0.53 acres), so the total accessory building coverage will only be about 13% of the backyard area. The Demonstrated Need for Such a Use. The applicant is proposing to build a new garage in the backyard to replace the existing garage that will be attached to the house and remodeled into living space. Since the proposed 1,800 square foot garage is the maximum amount of accessory building allowed, this property will not have any additional sheds or garages. Variance Discusssion The applicant will be accessing the new garage in the backyard with vehicles on a daily basis, so he will be installing a 10 foot wide driveway from the existing driveway around the house to the garage. The existing garage/house has a 12 foot setback so the driveway would only have a two foot setback for a stretch of approximately 26 feet where it runs next to the house. The applicant has applied for a variance to allow a two foot driveway setback. 8312 Red Oak CUP & VR Request April 16, 2014 Page 3 The Zoning Code states that the Planning Commission may issue a variance to provide relief to the landowner in those cases where the Code imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the property owner's land. This is true for all variance requests. State statutes require that the governing body review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. These criteria are set forth in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. A variance may be granted only in the event that all of the following circumstances exist: a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of these regulations. The zoning code requires minimum driveway setbacks for aesthetics and to provide separation and some sense of privacy between neighbors. The required setbacks typically can be met, but in many cases, particularly for older homes, the garages are behind the house and the driveway runs next to the house which rarely has a very big setback. b. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not specify setback criteria, but it does support improvements to properties. C. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Title or the City Code. The property owners want to expand their small house, and to have enough garage space to park their vehicles inside and for storage. The Zoning Code requires an improved surface driveway for garages that are accessed regularly, and there is not enough room next to the house for a driveway to have a five foot setback. The reduced setback would not be the full length of the driveway. d. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to otherproperties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this Title has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. This house was originally built as a small cabin in 1948 and is a unique log building. The current owners purchased the property in 2011 and want to do a significant remodel to make it a more livable house. Expanding the house to the north makes the most sense with how the house is presently laid out, which will leave only the backyard area to put a garage. e. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The applicant's neighborhood consists of larger, half -acre sized lots. The new driveway will have very little effect on the look of the property from the street. The neighbor's house that would be most affected by the reduc6d setback of the driveway, is placed fairly far away from the proposed driveway location. 8312 Red Oak CUP & VR Request April 16, 2014 Page 4 f. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The 2 foot variance is the minimum variance needed since that is what the Zoning Code requires for a driveway setback. g. The Planning Commission may impose such conditions upon the premises benefited by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established by this Title or to reduce or minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Staff has no suggestions for conditions for the variance request. The Planning Commission may add conditions as they see applicable. Public Hearing: As with any requested variance, this application requires a public hearing. Staff mailed notices to all property owners within 350 feet of the applicant's property and a notice was published in the Sun Focus newspaper on Friday, April 4, 2014. Staff has talked to two people who had questions about the proposal, but no formal comments have been received. Recommendation: Aftertaking testimony from staff, the applicant and affected neighbors, the Commission maytake any of the following actions below related to the requests. Staff recommends approval of this conditional use permit and variance. 1. Recommend approval of the CUP as requested. Staff has prepared Resolution 998-14 that approves the conditional use permit if the Commission chooses this action. 2. Approval of the Variance as requested. Staff has prepared Resolution 999-14 that approves the variance if the Commission chooses this action. 3. Choose to deny the conditional use permit or variance. If the Commission chooses this option, Staff would need direction from the Planning Commission to prepare a resolution of denial with findings of fact to support the denial. 4. Table one or both of the requests. If the Planning Commission needs more information before making a decision or if they decide that there is need for more discussion, the Commission can simply move to table the request until such information has been provided. Because of 60 -day requirements, the Commission would need to act upon the request as soon as reasonably possible to avoid an inadvertent approval. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Views 3. Site Plan 4. Photos 5. Resolution 998-14 for CUP 6. Resolution 999-14 for VR Zoning Map N Con 8240 N l0 N eF N N N N 8230 ARDAN 8261 9 8401 8406 N 8405 8404 WW 8415 o4ua 8400 8380 o�i� 8395 8381 8375 8371 8357 8323 8321 8285 8273 8265 8255 8384 8 co tr�W P; PO8355 8389 8400 8379 8380 Q8359 8379 8390 8405 8384 8395 8373 8370 8370 8385 8365 8372 8368 8367 8360 8375 83608379 8350 8355 8350 8345 8364 8335 8340 8325 8312 8345 8340 8345 8340 4 8335 8330 6 8331 833D 8325 8320 8343 8342 315 8320 8315 8318 8335 8332 303 8310 8305 8291 8281 8310 $290 8280 8315 8300 8333 8322 8325 8300 — GROVELAN D PARK 8305 8295 8290 8285 8280 8 8287 8281 82$0 8270 Z = 8275 8270 � 8271 8270 a 8265 8260 $273 8260 8261 8250 W 8255 8250 8267 8250 8251 Con 8240 N l0 N eF N N N N 8230 ARDAN 8261 r 8240 8255 N L23 COD D; 4 —* 8241 N N N N N 8231 AVE 2 1„ * Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential h� i ITT 1 'r �4, f p a .:w 9,arage 0'x60' tj,. - TV Narrative from Applicant Charles Pelton 8312 Red Oak Drive Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 Heidi Hellar Planning Associate City of Mounds View Planning Commission 2401 County Road 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 Dear Mrs. Hellar, I wish to apply for both a Variance and a Conditional Use permit for an upcoming construction project at my property located at 8312 Red Oak Drive in Mounds View Minnesota. My plan is to remodel the house, incorporating the entire existing garage footprint into the house. This will add approximately 916 of finished square feet to the structure. In addition I am proposing to add on to the existing driveway and to build a new oversized detached garage structure on the back lot on my property. The total proposed size of the detached garage would be 30 feet * 60 feet = 1800 square feet. I will have no choice but to locate the new garage structure on the back of the lot because there is no other location on the lot that is suitable to build the structure due to the city codes, property lines, set backs and easements on the property. My plans are to commence with this project as soon a City of Mounds View grants their approval, and it should be substantially completed In approximately 1 year's time. Conditional Use Permit Request: I wish to apply for a Conditional Use Permit to build an oversized detached garage structure on the rear portion of my lot. Patre 1 of 7. Narrative from Applicant Continued It is my estimation that not having a garage structure on my property (after attaching existing garage to the house) should constitute an undue hardship for the following reasons: 1. Inability to fully utilize the rear 60% of the lot. 2. Inability to store vehicles, equipment and other personal possessions indoors and out of the elements. 3. Negatively affect the ability to sell the property because of no garage. 4. Negatively affect the resale value of the property because of no garage. 5. Aesthetic Appearance; I would have no space for vehicle parking except for in front of the house and on the driveway, which is not very aesthetically pleasing for the neighborhood. Variance for Driveway Setback Requirements: I am also requesting a variance to the setback requirements for driveways. Before I can access the rear portion of the lot and the newly proposed detached garage structure, I will 1st need to extend my existing driveway and route it around the north side of the existing garage and to the location of the detached garage structure In the rear lot. The existing garage structures north wall is currently only 12 feet from the neighboring property line. I am proposing to install ale foot wide driveway directly adjacent to the north wall of the existing garage. The new driveway will encroach on the currently required property line set back of 5 foot. I am requesting that the planning commission grant a variance to the setback requirements and allow a. foot driveway setback, which will allow for the installation of a new driveway. Sincerely Charles Pelton (651) 769-7849 Site Plan K c,rr ---- • --- ..r., vav• as k7 A.&Mli, NOR /. 7 SRIS n w'S IF, -1.!5 r m v rN J V / a6� �-- I_ � I I DoAt rV4 70, e off__ - ac' ®Nuu 5v)— Oct Irc v).. 83P fL" (7 g. k Octtrc upcky El" ti I- NG+eo ro olt?i Se�f b�c►�, iN • • • property 74N�'"s. Ovral 'o• t1. ',. ��r f ��g� rr � �R � �����II Rr.F`l �*'•'"`Cts ' �'c � t � c D��"' ` ! 1 �..� �7�.. �7' jai`` ,4fi �: ; �,-�, -.': # ''� w 1,syy�.•r +�' 4` t �lj � �Fc ' y -•T�a Y >> ) y � s 4 it'd 1 �^. ^�{ •�w �A�/ "ice✓��,;, i'r . •- Current garage '- �ei MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 998-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A 1,800 SQUARE -FOOT GARAGE AT 8312 RED OAK DRIVE; PLANNING CASE MU2014-001-CU-1 WHEREAS, property owner Charles Pelton has applied for a conditional use permit to construct a new 1,800 square foot detached garage; and, WHEREAS, the subject property, located at 8312 Red Oak Drive, is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and is legally described as follows: Except the West 264 feet of the North 97 feet of the South 1802 feet of the West 528 feet of the NE %, Subject to Roadway Easements, Section 6, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota PIN: 06-30-23-12-0018 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Zoning Code conditionally allows garages in excess of 952 square feet in area with a maximum accessory building area not to exceed 1,800 square feet; and, WHEREAS, the proposed garage would be 1,800 square feet, thus requiring City approval of a conditional use permit; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly -noticed public hearing regarding this request on April 16, 2014; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: a. Zoning Map b. Aerial View C. Site plan d. Photographic documentation e. Staff Report NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact related to the conditional use permit request: 1. The proposed oversized 1,800 square foot garage satisfies the zoning requirements as outlined in Chapters 1104 and 1106 the Zoning Code. Resolution 998-14 Page 2 2. The request is consistent with the Mounds View Comprehensive Plan in that the Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential property in general. 3. The proposed garage would not be out of place given the character and geography of the surrounding area involved. 4. The proposed garage would not depreciate the neighborhood. 5. The applicant has sufficiently demonstrated that a need exists for the proposed oversized garage. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the conditional use permit for the 1,800 square foot garage, with conditions as follows: 1. The garage shall not be used for living space or commercial purposes and other uses not allowed within the R-1 Single -Family Residential district or bythe Zoning Code. Should the use change for which the permit was granted; the conditional use permit shall be considered null and void. 2. The expanded garage area shall be designed and maintained to provide a complimentary appearance with the existing house. 3. The Conditional Use Permit (CUP) shall become null and void if the work for which the CUP was granted is not completed within one year from the date of approval unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the City Council. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 16th day of April, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 999-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A THREE (3) FOOT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A DRIVEWAY AT 8312 RED OAK DRIVE; PLANNING CASE MU2014-001-VR-1 WHEREAS, property owner Charles Pelton, has applied for a three (3) foot setback variance to allow the driveway leading around the house to the garage in the backyard to have a reduced setback; and, WHEREAS, the subject property, located at 8312 Red Oak Drive is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and is legally described as follows: Except the West 264 feet of the North 97 feet of the South 1802 feet of the West 528 feet of the NE Y4, Subject to Roadway Easements, Section 6, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota PIN: 06-30-23-12-0018 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial View 3. Photographic Documentation 4. Staff Report WHEREAS, Section 1104.01 Subd. 4c(1a) of the Mounds View Zoning Code indicates that driveways shall be set back at least five feet (5); and, WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to allow a driveway to have a two (2) foot setback; and, WHEREAS, the purpose of the variance provision in the Zoning Code is to give relief to property owners when the strict enforcement of the zoning code requirements imposes a hardship thereby restricting the improvement of property due to practical difficulties brought about by unique or extraordinary features of the physical property that are beyond the property owner's control; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly -noticed public hearing regarding this request on April 16, 2014; and, Resolution 999-14 Page 2 WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all must be satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient practical difficulty with regard to the property located at 8312 Red Oak Drive, and makes the following findings of fact related to its decision: The general intent of the Zoning Code regarding setbacks is to create physical separation between driveways for aesthetics and a sense of privacy for the property owners. There is a large distance between the new driveway and the neighboring house, and the new driveway will not have the reduced setback for the entire length. 2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the applicant is improving the property. 3. The applicant is requesting this variance because the driveway will run past the house that only has a setback of 12 feet, and in order to have a 10 foot wide drive aisle past the house, the driveway setback will be two (2) feet. 4. The unique feature of this property is the small house that the owners will be expanding, and the new garage will be in the backyard so the driveway has to run past the house in the limited space that is there. There will be little change to the existing character of the neighborhood since the new driveway area won't be very visible. 6. The 2 -foot variance is the minimum variance required to alleviate the applicant's practical difficulty since that is what the zoning code requires for driveway setbacks. 7. The Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the premises as may be necessary to comply with city standards and to minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission, based upon the above findings, approves the variance request of Charles Pelton, property owner of 8312 Red Oak Drive, to allow a driveway to have a 2 -foot setback. Adopted this 16th day of April, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) of Mounds View Staff Item No: 6A Meeting Date: April 16, 2014 Type of Business: Other Planning Activity To: Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion The corridor continues to be the City Council's priority and the Planning Commission has been reviewing the Zoning Code in order to better promote and accommodate development along County Road 10. The Commission has been discussing creating a Corridor Overlay District in order to give more flexibility to new development projects on the corridor. The City is willing to be flexible on requirements such as setbacks, parking, density and height, but the City also wants projects that are high quality. A second draft of the overlay district language is attached for discussion. The changes made since the last meeting have been highlighted. Subdivision 8 was only split up into a,b and c making it easier to read. The City Council will be reviewing this proposed language also, and it has been suggested that it would be valuable for the discussion to be a joint meeting with the Council and the Planning Commission. Staff has scheduled this joint discussion for the May 5, 2014 Council Worksession. Recommendation Continue the discussion about a County Road 10 Corridor District Overlay and review the second draft of the proposed language for the district. Sincerely, Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Attachment: 1. Proposed language for County Road 10 overlay district 3 M PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR COUNTY ROAD 10 OVERLAY DISTRICT 1120.03 Subd. 4. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District a. Purpose: The purpose of this District is to provide standards of development for land lying on either side of the major transportation corridor along County Road 10. The County Road 10 Corridor District is the primary gateway through the City. The aesthetic impacts from new developments and redevelopments must be evaluated to help ensure the long-term viability and success of the District. Accomplishing the purpose of the County Road 10 Corridor District requires particular concern for the site layout, building materials, site features and other related design elements. To that end, new development and redevelopment shall conform to the standards in this and related zoning requirements. In reviewing and approving land use applications, the City Council shall make the final determination in the compatibility and consistency with all provisions in this and related sections of the Zoning Ordinance. b. Overlay Area Defined: The following area is hereby established as being within the County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District: (1) All parcels that have frontage on County Road 10, (2) All parcels that are within 200 feet of the County Road 10 right-of-way, (3) The City may determine that a specific development area will not benefit from the overlay district and can exclude that project area from the district requirements. c. Permitted Uses: The overlay district provisions apply to any base zoning district set forth in this Title that exists within the defined overlay area. d. Standards: For development of properties within the County Road 10 overlay district, the following standards shall be applied where such standards supersede requirements set forth in the B-1 (Neighborhood Business), B-2 (Limited Business), B-3 (Highway Business), and B-4 (Regional Business) zoning districts. All other standards and requirements of the above- mentioned zoning districts shall continue to apply. (1) Construction Materials: (a) At least fifty (50) percent of all exterior wall finishes on any building shall be comprised of a combination of at least two of the following materials: • Brick • Natural stone or cultured stone • Glass Masonry stucco • Other comparable or superior material as approved by the City 1 (b) The remaining fifty (50) percent of all exterior wall finishes shall be comprised of any combination of decorative or rock face concrete block, concrete panels, metal or wood. All building materials subject to approval of the City. (c) Buildings may be constructed of primarily one of the materials listed in Subd. 4d (1)(a), if the design exceeds the intent of the ordinance. (d) Non -decorative exposed concrete block buildings are prohibited, as are pre-engineered metal buildings, corrugated metal -sided buildings, and wood sided buildings unless such metal buildings and wood sided buildings are enhanced on all elevations by the application of brick, decorative masonry, or decorative stucco surfaces in combination with decorative fascia overhangs and trim. (2) Architectural Design: Each building will be reviewed for at least the following considerations: (a) Appropriate location of structures on the site with relationship to other site amenities, restrictions, adjacent land usage, etc. (b) General layout, roof treatments, proportion and quality of exterior. (c) In the design of buildings or clusters of buildings, developers should orient projects so that the side(s) facing County Road 10 form the front of the project. Where front toward County Road 10 is not feasible due to the location of access roads and other site constraints, the project should be oriented and designed in such a manner so as to convey a pleasing appearance from County Road 10. (d) Screening of mechanical equipment, tanks, loading docks, refuse handling, ancillary equipment, etc., whether on the roof or on the site. (e) Drainage pipes on exterior building walls facing a street and/or County Road 10 must be integral to the design and non - apparent. (f) Exceptions to the architectural design standards set forth in this section may be granted by the City Administrator or designee, for structures of comparable design and building materials. (3) Building and Parking Setback Requirements: Buildings and parking lots should have no more than a five (5) foot setback from County Road 10. The required setbacks for the other sides of the property will be determined by the City, based on the specific project and land usage. 2 (4) Off -Street Parking: The City will use the off-street parking requirements in Chapter 1121.13 as a guideline, and base the final determination of required spaces on the specific project and land usage. (5) Landscaping: (a) Landscaping requirements shall be in accordance with Chapter 1127, Tree Preservation and Landscaping. (b) A minimum of fifteen (15) percent of the total area of each lot shall be devoted to landscaped open space. (c) All open areas of any lot not used for parking, driveways, or storage shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, berms and planted ground cover. (6) Signs: In accordance with Chapter 1010. (7) Outdoor Storage and Dumpster Screening: (a) No outdoor storage shall be permitted unless such storage is " visually screened from view from County Road 10 and all adjoining residential properties, with suitable solid fence constructed of masonry or wood at least six (6) feet in height. } Screening shall be well maintained. (b) No dumpsters may be located on the sides of buildings fronting County Road 10, except if in the opinion of the City no other suitable location is reasonably available for such purpose, and provided the dumpster area is developed in a manner so as to minimize it's appearance from County Road 10. (c) All dumpsters shall be entirely screened by a masonry or solid wooden fence, with gate, or a comparable screening, at least six (6) feet in height. (8) Existing Uses and Structures: Uses and structures in this District that were conforming prior to the effective date of this Ordinance will remain conforming upon adoption of this Ordinance. All subsequent additions, exterior alteration and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building after the date of adoption of this ordinance, shall be: (a) Constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction, and, (b) Shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and appearance, and, } (c) Meet all other standards set forth in this ordinance. k? PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting April 2, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for April 2, 2014. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Birken, Carvelli-Yu, Elofson, Rundle, Schiltgen, and Stevenson. Absent and Excused: Commissioner Love. Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller. Index to Minutes Page Approval of Minutes I County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion 2 3. Approval of Minutes February 19, 2014. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Birken. To approve the Minutes of the February 19, 2014 regular Planning Commission meeting as slightly amended. Ayes — 6 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. t Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 2 5. Planning Cases None. 6. Other Planning Activity A. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion Planning Associate Heller informed the Commission that the County Road 10 Corridor continues to be a priority for the Council. For this reason, the Planning Commission has been reviewing the Zoning Code in order to better promote and accommodate development along County Road 10. The Commission has been discussing creating a Corridor Overlay District in order to give more flexibility to new development projects along the corridor. She reviewed proposed language for an overlay district noting the City was willing to be flexible on requirements such as setbacks, parking, density and height, but also wants projects that are high quality. Staff requested questions and comments from the Commission. Chair Stevenson supported the rationale proposed by staff and the well laid out design of the overlay district. Commissioner Schiltgen questioned if other communities created overlay districts. Associate Heller stated was quite common, especially for downtown or historical districts. She noted Blaine had an overlay district along Highway 65. Commissioner Birken thanked staff for pulling the overlay district language together for the Commission to review. She believed this was a great concept for the City to consider in order to move the corridor in the right direction. Commissioner Birken asked if all parcels within 200 feet of County Road 10 would be included in the overlay district. Associate Heller reported this was done to make adjoining parcels, or parcels that didn't technically have frontage on County Road 10, but were part of the corridor. Commissioner Birken questioned if existing properties would be allowed to remain as is. Associate Heller stated this would be the case. Commissioner Birken requested further information on construction materials. Associate Heller explained this language would be further reviewed with the Building Inspector. She indicated the City was hoping to encourage improved building design and materials along the corridor. Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 3 Commissioner Carvelli-Yu supported the use of manmade stone within the approved building materials list. Commissioner Birken commented that a great deal of the language within the code was subj ective. Associate Heller indicated this was done intentionally to allow for some level of flexibility for future developers. Commissioner Birken discussed the landscaping requirements within the overlay district. She wondered if 15% of green space was on the low side. She questioned if the current code had green space requirements. Associate Heller reported the current code did not have a green space percentage requirement. She noted the City also had landscaping requirements in place. Chair Stevenson reviewed the revised site plan for Crossroad Pointe. Commissioner Carvelli-Yu asked if trash within Mounds View had to be picked up on the same day. Associate Heller stated this was the case for residential pickup, but commercial pick up could be any day of the week. Commissioner Birken believed the comment regarding percentages of renovation should be eliminated from the overlay district language. She expressed concern with future building additions to existing buildings and wanted to ensure that building materials would match. Further discussion ensued regarding building renovation requirements for existing buildings along the County Road 10 corridor, in addition to proposed parking requirements. Commissioner Birken recommended the language regarding granting exceptions to the overlay district be amended as it could be construed to be capricious. Associate Heller thanked the Commission for their comments and suggestions. She explained she would continue to revise the overlay district language and the Commission would discuss this item again at the next meeting. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. April 16, 2014 B. May 7, 2014 Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 4 8. Review Minutes: A. March 19, 2014 The Commission discussed the March 19, 2014 meeting minutes. No changes were made. 9. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. She noted that North Metro Motors had finally purchased the former Thrifty Car Rental building and would be opening within a couple weeks, and the former Minnesota Institute of Public Health building next to Holiday gas station also is being purchased. She explained that walls were being poured on the Coventry Senior Living project. She reported the City was proposing to amend residential parking restrictions to allow for larger commercial vehicles. She noted the City was close to hiring a part-time economic development coordinator. 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports None. 11. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 8:01 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA May 7, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: April 2, 2014 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases A. VR2014-001 Variance for Additional Wall Signage Applicant: Chad Mason, Allegiance Fitness Address: 2240 Woodale Drive B. MA2014-001 Major Subdivision of Longview Estates into 10 Lots Applicant: Eichi, Inc., Marty Harstad Address: 2195 Silver Lake Road 6. Other Planning Activity A. Review Sign Code Amendment, Chapter 1008.10 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, May 21, 2014 B. Wednesday, June 4, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. April 16, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion MoUrms VfE—v of Mounds View Staff R Item No: 5A Meeting Date: May 7, 2014 Type of Business: Public Hearing To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing - Consideration of a Variance request to allow 224 square feet of wall signage at Allegiance Fitness, 2240 Woodale Drive; Planning Case VR2014-001 Introduction: The applicant, Chad Mason, representing Allegiance Fitness at 2240 Woodale Drive, has requested a variance to allow an additional 124 square feet of wall signage on the exterior of their building. Allegiance Fitness opened in the summer of 2013 and leases space in the Mounds View Business Park South. Their building has two visible frontages— one side facing County Road 10 and the other side facing the parking lot, where the entrances are. Each tenant in the business park can have up to 100 square feet of wall signage. Each parcel in the business park can have up to 200 square feet of ground signage, but often that signage must be shared among multiple tenants and any sign is at the discretion of the property management company, if they even provide ground signage at all. The property management only recently installed a ground sign for the south business park tenants, but the sign was placed so that the list of businesses is not visible to traffic going northwest on County Road 10 Discussion: Allegiance Fitness is expanding and will be using most of the building, and want to improve their exterior signage so their business is more visible and to make it easier for customers to find them. Their business is two different types of training facilities, so with the expansion they will have a separate entrance for each of the training areas. Since these entrances are spaced quite far apart they want to put a sign above each doorway. The property management company is supportive of this additional signage request. Allegiance Fitness currently has three wall signs of their wing logo that are 24 square foot each (total 72 square feet). One logo sign is on the County Road 10 side and the other two logo signs are flanking the original entrance door. They would like to keep the three existing logo signs, and add three new wall signs with the Allegiance Fitness wording, for a total of 224 square feet of wall signage. Similar Requests: Over the years, several businesses in Mounds View have been granted variances for additional wall signage: Aldi and Totino's at Mounds View Square, the retail building with Abbey Carpet, the Carmike Wynnsong theater, C.G. Hill in the north business park, and the KFC restaurant have all received variances or other approvals for signage in excess of 100 square feet. The Mermaid, through its PUD, was also allowed signage in excess of the City's requirements. Allegiance Fitness Variance Report May 7, 2014 Page 2 For the Planning Commission to act favorably toward this application, there must be a demonstrated hardship or practical difficulty associated with the property that makes a literal interpretation of the Code overly burdensome or restrictive to a property owner. This is true for all variance requests. State statutes require that the governing body review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. These criteria are set forth in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. The Code clearly states that a hardship exists when all of the criteria are met. The individual criteria, with responses, are as follows: a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of these regulations. The zoning code limits amounts of signage for aesthetic reasons. The zoning code does not take into consideration the size of the business's building or the visibility of the building from its street frontages. Due the angle of County Road 10, some businesses located along the highway have more than one visible street front where wall signage could be appropriate. b. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. While the Comprehensive Plan does not specify signage criteria for businesses, it does support improvements to, and the success of the City's businesses. The installation of additional wall signage will be helpful to the success of this business. C. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Title or the City Code. The applicant is asking for the additional wall signage in order for the business to be more visible to potential customers, and to help new customers find their location. d. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this Title has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. The unique circumstances of this building are that it has two very visible sides — one side is only visible from County Road 10, and the other side faces the parking lot where the entrances are; and because they are in a business park with multiple tenants, they do not have their own ground signage like other businesses. e. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. This business is located within a multiple building business park that is on the main commercial corridor that runs through the City. The additional signage will have little impact to the existing character of the neighborhood. Allegiance Fitness May 7, 2014 Page 3 Variance Report The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Allowing the additional 124 square feet of wall signage would be the minimum the applicant feels is necessary to provide suitable visibility. The Planning Commission may impose such conditions upon the premises benefited by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established by this Title or to reduce or minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. 1. A zoning permit must be applied for and issued for the new signage. Public Hearing: As with any requested variance, a public hearing is required. Staff mailed notices to all property owners within 350 feet of the applicant's property and a notice was published in the Sun Focus newspaper. As of May 2, 2014, staff has not received any comments. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commissioners take testimony from staff and the applicant and open the public hearing. After holding the public hearing and taking testimony from staff, the applicant and the public, the Commission may take one of the following actions related to the request: 1. Approve the variance as requested. Resolution 1001-14 is attached for action if the Commission so chooses. 2. Deny the requested variance. The Commission should direct staff to draft a resolution of denial with findings appropriate to support the denial. 3. Table the request. If the Planning Commission needs more information before making a decision or if they decide there is a need for more discussion, the Commission can simply move to table the request until such information has been provided. Respectfully Submitted By, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Photo 3. Photos of building 4. Photos of building with 5. Resolution 1001-14 proposed signage ZOO H V H G VVI A G' N * Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential Aerial View A � J A Photos of Allegiance Fitness Allegiance Fitness is expanding into Parking lot side most of this building. Existing signs on this building side are the 2 "wing" logos = 48 square feet total County Road 10 side Existing signage = 24 square foot wing logo Photos showing proposed signage on building Side Facing County Road 10 Wings logo = 4' x 6' (24 sq. feet) Lettering = 3.5' x 34.5' (120 sq feet) MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1001-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW 224 SQUARE FEET OF WALL - MOUNTED SIGNAGE AT ALLEGIANCE FITNESS, 2240 WOODALE DRIVE; PLANNING CASE VR2014-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Chad Mason, representing Allegiance Fitness, 2240 Woodale Drive, has applied for a variance to allow 224 square feet of wall signage; and, WHEREAS, 2240 Woodale Drive is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development, and is legally described as follows: Condo No. 296 Mounds View Business Park South PIN: 08-30-23-43-0019 and 08-30-23-43-0021 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Site Plan 2. Zoning Map 3. Aerial View 4. Staff Report 5. Photographic Documentation WHEREAS, Section 1008.09 of the Sign Code indicates that the maximum wall - mounted signage for a commercial building is 100 square feet per business occupant; and, WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to allow 224 square feet of wall - mounted signage; and, WHEREAS, the purpose of the variance provision in the Zoning Code is to give relief to property owners when the strict enforcement of the zoning code requirements imposes a hardship thereby restricting the improvement of property due to practical difficulties brought about by unique or extraordinary features of the physical property that are beyond the property owner's control; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly -noticed public hearing regarding this request on May 7, 2014; and, WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all must be satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. Resolution 1001-14 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient practical difficultywith regard to the property located at 2240 Woodale Drive, and makes the following findings of fact related to its decision: 1. The general intent of the Zoning Code regarding signage limits is for aesthetic reasons. The requested additional signage still meets the general purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the applicant is trying to keep the business successful. 3. The applicant is requesting this variance because the building is large and has two visible frontages and two entrances. 4. The unique feature of this property is the way the building is sitting on the property. One side is visible from County Road 10 and another side is where the parking lot and two entrances are. This business is in a business park and they only have limited ground signage. 5. The additional signage will not alter the existing commercial character of the neighborhood. 6. The variance requested is the minimum variance the applicant feels is required to provide suitable visibility and alleviate the applicant's practical difficulty. 7. The Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the premises as may be necessary to comply with city standards and to minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission, based upon the above findings, approves the variance request of Allegiance Fitness at 2240 Woodale Drive, to allow a total of 224 square feet of wall -mounted signage. Adopted this 7th day of May, 2014. Paul Schiltgen,Vice Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) MOUNDS VIEW City of Mounds View Staff Report Item No: 513 Meeting Date: May 7, 2014 Type of Business: Planning Case To Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat for a proposed Major Subdivision at Longview Estates, 5173 Longview Drive; Planning Case MA2014-001 Introduction: Marty Harstad, representing Eichi, Inc. has submitted an application for a major subdivision of vacant land known as Longview Estates. This 7.14 acre parcel is on the west side of Longview Drive between County Road H2 and Woodale Drive. The proposed subdivision would create 10 buildable lots from the existing one lot. Discussion: The area identified as Longview Estates is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The proposed subdivision would be consistent with the existing zoning of the property. This parcel is designated as a wetland district; therefore the minimum size for these lots is 125 feet wide and 20,000 square feet. In 2010, the City Council approved a variance to allow reduced lots widths in this development area. All of the lots shown on the preliminary plat meet the 20,000 square foot requirement, but only two lots meet the 125 foot width requirement. Due to the amount of wetlands present on this parcel, the lots will be developed with the driveways accessing Longview Drive and very limited yard space. A boulder wall will be built along the entire length of the parcel, fairly close behind each of the homes, as a divider between the homes and the wetland. The City is being given a 42 -foot wide outlot that runs next to Silver Lake Road for the full length of the entire 7 -acre parcel. The City requested this outlot in order to prevent any further development from occurring in this area. There are uplands that will be dry in this area, and neither the City or Rice Creek Watershed District want the new property owners to build sheds, garages, play structures, etc. here because they will need to cross the wetlands to reach them. This leads to fill being brought in, doing landscaping or clearing of the growth in the wetland. There will also be a new pond that the City will be maintaining. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates the Longview Estates parcel and much of the surrounding area as single family detached housing. The proposed subdivision would be consistent with that designation, and with the residential goals and policies as articulated in the Land Use section of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal would also be consistent with specific housing goals and policies articulated in the Comp Plan. Longview Estates Major Subdivision May 7, 2014 Page 2 Local Water Management Plan: Also known as the City's Surface Water Management Plan, this planning document guides the City in regards to drainage and stormwater management. The project area is located in the SC -2 sub -watershed. The minimum recommended building elevation for the SC -2 sub -watershed is set at 891.9 feet. Easements: The City's Subdivision Code requires that plats dedicate perimeter drainage and utility easements for each lot in the subdivision. This plat does dedicate the necessary perimeter easements along with a very large easement behind the homes that encompasses the wetland area. There will also be a new 20 foot easement between lots 8 and 9 for the stormwater pipe that is being relocated further north and will drain into the new pond. Streets: The ten new lots will have access onto Longview Drive, which is a city owned road and was reconstructed in 2012. This street is adequate to handle the amount of added traffic that ten additional homes would create. Park Dedication Requirements: The Subdivision Code indicates that any subdivision of land is subject to a park dedication fee. The dedication imposed is intended to mitigate public costs to the parks system associated with land development. The fee shall be reasonable and based on the extent of the development. In this case, the fee should be equal to 10% of the market value of the land. To establish the market value, staff uses Ramsey County assessed values as the basis for dedication computation. The 2013 Ramsey County land value is $120,000. The dedication amount then would be $12,000. Utilities: All utilities on the site would need to be installed underground, per Section 1203.10. Water and sanitary sewer connections have already been installed for 10 lots. Traffic: The amount of daily vehicle trips on the proposed road will definitely increase since ten additional housing units are proposed. On average, single-family homes generate about 10 vehicle trips per day, thus one could expect an additional 100 movements along Longview Drive as a result of this subdivision. Vegetation: The 7.14 acre site is mostly wooded with wetlands. The applicant must follow the landscaping requirements in City Code Chapter 1127. Staff recommends that after each house has been constructed, the yard areas should be sodded and at least one tree shall be planted in the front yard — whether they are existing trees or new ones planted if the existing trees must be removed. The new tree species must be approved by the City. Mr. Harstad does not plan to build the homes, so most of the landscaping requirements will be addressed with the home builder. Wetlands: The National Wetlands Inventory Map and the City's official Wetland Zoning Map identify a significant wetland within the property boundary. Since the property is over one acre in size, the applicant will need to apply for a general stormwater permit from the MPCA. The applicant has already received approvals and a permit from Rice Creek Watershed District. Significant work and soil corrections will be done to the property in order to prepare for building. Longview Estates Major Subdivision May 7, 2014 Page 3 Recommendation: Review the plans and discuss the proposed preliminary plat. Staff review revealed no deficiencies at this time and thus Resolution 1002-14 recommending approval of the preliminary plat has been drafted for your action if the Commission so desires. Respectfully Submitted By, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Preliminary Plat 2. Zoning Map 3. Aerial View 4. Comp Plan Future Land Use Map 5. Planning Commission Resolution 1002-14 W W �Qv"i 22z y..T� awn C� agO� a Uws.- = y^mv =CD co; Iww ZNz 0.® O ------------- r; -- 1 - - -- — I 1 I I b n V Fj ; ai tF��F 3 1 a�n?�9 fi fy £ 5i 5 I i � r I I r r i ` r � 1 I Td N= R ZyV4 �� � I 1 1 cNym I -- 1 - - -- — I 1 I I b n I X Fj .. .. :.r i . . w, �lano ��elll memo 5 's c b n j Y_e Yb Fj ; ai tF��F gy fi a�n?�9 fi fy £ 5i 5 n3 �lano ��elll memo 5 's c b n j Y_e Yb 6 A XI fi fy £ 5i 5 n3 0 Td N= R ZyV4 �� ren uiM� a cNym a ^'S s a6`r j Zoning Map N " Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential M h N 52E 52E 52E 52, 52; i52' n v 59 52 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51C 504 501 50. 501 501 50 50• MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1002-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF LONGVIEW ESTATES INTO 10 LOTS; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. MA2014-001 WHEREAS, Marty Harstad, reprenting Eichi, Inc. has requested approval of a preliminary plat for the major subdivision of Longview Estates, legally -described as follows: Lot 4, Block 1, MuellerAddition WHEREAS, The above-described land is zoned R-1, Single -Family Residential and is designated as Single -Family Detached on the Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, Marty Harstad with Eichi, Inc. has submitted a Preliminary Plat for the major subdivision which creates 10 buildable lots; and, WHEREAS, the community development and public works staff have reviewed the preliminary plat and finds that it satisfies the minimum subdivision requirements as articulated in Titles 1100 and 1200 of the Mounds View Municipal Code and complies with county platting requirements; and, WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision is within a designated wetland area; and, WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution 7658, approving a variance to allow reduced lot widths in a wetland district; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 1204.04, Subd. 4, the subdivision is subject to a park dedication fee of $12,000, which would be equivalent to 10% of the 2013 Ramsey County assessed value of the land area, which is determined to be $120,000.00; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Staff Report 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Zoning Map 4. Aerial View 5. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Resolution 1002-14 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary Plat submitted by Marty Harstad, Elchi, Inc. subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall pay a park dedication fee in the recommended amount of $12,000. 2. The applicant shall follow City Code Chapter 1127 for landscaping requirements. 3. The applicant shall obtain permits, if required, from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency before construction activity commences. 4. All utilities within the development area and to the individual home sites shall be located underground. 5. The applicant shall enter into various agreements with the City and/or the EDA including (but not limited to) a Developers Agreement. 6. The applicant shall apply for Final Plat approval no later than 6 months after the date of approval of the preliminary plat, or the Preliminary Plat approval will become null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 7 t day of May, 2014. Paul Schiltgen, Vice Chair James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) > MUMS ViEw of Mounds View Staff Item No: 6A Meeting Date: MaV 7, 2014 Type of Business: Other Planning Activity To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Discussion about Amending Chapter 1008 of the Mounds View Municipal Code Pertaining to Dynamic Display Signs Introduction: The City amended its sign code on January 12, 2009 to include operational requirements and conditions for the use of dynamic display signage with the adoption of Ordinance 816. The code has since been amended to make additional changes after the dynamic sign code was put into effect. Staff is proposing another amendment. Discussion: Prior to the adoption of the ordinance regulating dynamic signs in 2009, these types of signs were not specifically addressed in the City Code, and were allowed just as other types of signs. With the new technology that was allowing dynamic displays to become more affordable and common for businesses, and the conversion of billboards to electronic signs, the City Council felt they needed to put some regulations on these types of signs. The sign code was amended to add a section specifically for dynamic signs. Technology for dynamic display signs is continually changing and improving. The City recently replaced the dynamic display sign at City Hall and sees firsthand the possibilities of what can put displayed on these signs. The City Council discussed this issue and decided that allowing "movement' of the messages, for example, flowing one screen or image into the next, would be acceptable. The City Council asked that the Planning Commission discuss amending the Code to remove the language that requires each image to be static, with no movement on the display. The Planning Commission should also discuss a change to allow dynamic display signs to simply be a maximum of 50 square feet in size, rather than "50% of the sign face or 50 square feet, whichever is less." Recommendation: The Planning Commission should review and discuss the proposed amendments to City Code Chapter 1008 relating to dynamic signs as shown in the attached resolution. The Commission may take action if they are comfortable with the proposed amendments, or changes can be discussed and brought back to the Commission. Respectfully submitted, QIPKL� Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachment: 1. Resolution 1000-14 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1000-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1008 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY CODE ABOUT DYNAMIC DISPLAY SIGNS; SPECIAL PLANNING CASE 190-14 WHEREAS, City staff has recommended that amendments be made to the sign code relating to dynamic displays; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission agrees with the City Staff recommendation to remove language limiting what type of signs that dynamic displays are allowed on; and, WHEREAS, City staff has amended Chapter 1000, Section 1008.10 of the Mounds View City Code by deleting the strinken language and adding the underlined text as follows: Section 1008.10 Subd. 9. Dynamic Display Signs: (Added, Ord. 816, 1-22-09) a. The City allows noncommercial dynamic display signs wherever the City allows commercial dynamic display signs. Such signs are subject to the same standards and total maximum allowances per site or building of each sign type specified in this Chapter. (Added, Ord. 816, 1-22-09, Amended Ord. 864, 11-3-11) b. Standards for all dynamic display signs: (Added, Ord. 816, 1-22-09, Amended, Ord. 864, 11-3-11) - - - .- . -of images Or GGRt8PA. (Added, Ord. 816, 1-22-09, Amended, Ord. 864, 11-3-11) (2) No person or contractor shall install a dynamic display sign that because of its position, shape, movement or color, interferes with the proper functioning of a traffic sign, signal or that constitutes a traffic hazard. (Added, Ord. 816, 1-22-09) (3) All dynamic display signs shall have ambient light monitors and shall, at all times, allow such monitors to automatically adjust the brightness level of the sign based on light conditions. (Added, Ord. 816, 1-22-09) Resolution 1000-14 Page 2 (4) The manufacturers, owners and operators of dynamic display signs must design and equip such signs with a fully functional monitoring off switch system that automatically shuts the sign off or will freeze the device or sign in one (1) position; if a malfunction occurs. The signs and displays also must be equipped with a means to shut off or discontinue the display if it malfunctions. The sign owner or operator must stop or shut off the dynamic display within one (1) hour or as soon as reasonably possible of the City notification that the sign is not meeting the standards of this Section of Chapter. (Added, Ord. 816, 1-22-09) (5) Any dynamic display sign capable of accessing and utilizing MN Amber Alert technology shall display such messages as they are made available by the MN Dept. of Public Safety or other responsible agency. (Added, Ord. 864, 11-3-11) Section 1008.10 Subd. 9c. Dynamic Display Signs: c. In addition to all other standards of this chapter, the City allows on-site dynamic display signs subject to the following additional conditions: (Added, Ord. 816, 1-22-09, Amended Ord. 864, 11-3-11, Ord. 872, 6-7-12) (1) Such signs may be located only in the Limited Business (B-2), Highway Business (B-3), Regional Business (B-4) or Commercial Planned Unit Developments (PUD's) zoning districts. (Added, Ord. 816, 1-22-09, Amended, Ord. 864, 11-3-11) (2) Notwithstanding subsection 1 above, such signs may be located on the sites of schools, churches, places or worship or other institutional land uses, subject to the following additional conditions: (Added, Ord. 816,1-22-09, Amended, Ord. 864,11-3-11, Ord. 872, 6- 7-12) (a) City Council approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) as outlined in Section 1106.04 and Section 1125.01, subdivision 3 of the City Code. (Added, Ord. 816, 1-22-09) (b) Dynamic display signs in residentially zoned districts must utilize amber color lights. (Added, Ord. 864, 11-3-11) (c) Such signs shall not cause glare, disturbance or other problems to any residential properties or land uses. (Added, Ord. 816,1-22-09, Amended, Ord. 864,11-3-11) (3) The owner or operator of a dynamic display sign shall control and display the primary or background images and messages on the sign so they maintain each display for a minimum of four (4) seconds. (Added, Ord. 816,11-22-09, Amended, Ord. 864,11-3-11, Ord. 872, 6-7-12) (4) Dynamic display signage shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet of the sign area -GF fifty perGeRt o . (Added, Ord. 816, 1-22-09, Amended, Ord. 864, 11-3-11, Ord. 872, 6-7-12) Resolution 1000-14 Page 3 (5) Such signs may only display and advertise information about products, events, persons, institutions, activities, businesses, services, or subjects that are located on the premises or on the site or only to provide public service or community service information. (Added, Ord. 816, 1-22-09, Amended, Ord. 864, 11-3-11) (6) Such signs must meet all other City location and setback requirements. (Added, Ord. 816, 1-22-09, Amended, Ord. 864, 11-3-11) WHEREAS, amending the City Code to allow dynamic displays on all types of signs would better serve the public and would clarify the zoning requirements; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission concurs that an amendment to the City Code is warranted and justified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of amendments to Section 1008 of the Mounds View City Code as defined herein. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 7 t day of May, 2014. Paul Schiltgen, Vice Chairperson ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting April 16, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for April 16, 2014. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Birken, Caivelli-Yu, Elofson, Love, Rundle, Schiltgen, and Stevenson. Absent and Excused: None. Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller. Page Index to Minutes Approval of Minutes MU2014-001-CU-1 Conditional Use Permit for an Oversize Garage 2 MU2014-001-VR-1 Variance for a Reduced Driveway Setback County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion 4 3. Approval of Minutes March 19, 2014. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Schiltgen/Commissioner Carvelli-Yu. To approve the Minutes of the March 19, 2014 regular Planning Commission meeting as presented. Ayes — 7 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 4• Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. 5• Planning Cases April 16, 2014 Page 2 A. MU2014-001-CU-1 Conditional Use Permit for an Oversize Garage MU2014-001-VR-1 Variance for a Reduced Driveway Setback Applicant: Chuck Pelton Address: 8312 Red Oak Drive Planning Associate Heller indicated the applicant, Chuck Pelton, is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for an oversize detached garage and a variance for a reduced driveway setback on his property at 8312 Red Oak Drive. The applicant wants to expand his house by attaching the existing detached garage and turning it into living space. He then plans to build a new 1,800 square foot garage behind the house with a driveway. Associate Heller explained the applicant submitted plans for a garage larger than what City Code allows without a conditional use permit. Any building larger than 952 square feet must get City approval of a conditional use permit. The applicant will also be installing a driveway that connects to the existing driveway and leads to the new garage in the backyard. This driveway will run past the house and be closer than five feet to the property line, which requires a reduced driveway setback variance. Associate Heller reviewed the conditional use permit and variance requirements per City Code and recommended the Commission hold a public hearing, take comments and approve the CUP and variance as requested. Chair Stevenson opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. Curt Lyons, 2649 Ridge Lane, asked how close the new driveway would be to the property line. Associate Heller noted the driveway would be two feet from the property line. Mr. Lyons questioned if the applicant would be working out of the new garage. Chuck Pelton, 8312 Red Oak Drive, explained he was an HVAC contractor and noted the garage would be used for personal storage and not for business. He reported his commercial truck would be stored in the garage. Dave Notoro, 8325 Fairchild Avenue, requested further information on why a conditional use permit was required. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting April 16, 2014 Page 3 Associate Heller commented that the conditional use permit was required because the applicant as requesting to build a garage larger than was allowed by City Code. She reported the conditional use permit process involved a public hearing, and had to be reviewed and approved by both the Planning Commission and City Council. She explained that the conditional use permit process allowed the City to place conditions on the permit prior to approval and the applicant would be required to comply with these conditions. Dave Moracco, 8335 Fairchild Avenue, wanted assurance that no commerce or commercial activity would be taking place in the new garage. Chair Stevenson indicated the applicant has admitted the garage would be used to store a commercial vehicle and was not being used for commercial HVAC service. This was well within City Code for the R-1 Residential zoning district. Mr. Moracco requested the City continue to monitor this garage to ensure that the applicant does not begin using the detached garage for commercial purposes. Associate Heller discussed how the City regulated home based businesses in Mounds View. She reported homeowners were allowed to store commercial vehicles within garages. Chair Stevenson added that the City had a Code Enforcement Officer that assisted with these matters. Mr. Notoro asked what conditions would be placed on the permit for approval. He questioned the size and height of the detached garage and inquired if any trees on the applicant's property would be removed. Mr. Pelton stated the garage size was somewhat fluid but would be approximately 36 feet wide and 50 feet deep. He indicated three trees would need to be removed in order for him to put in the garage and driveway. He explained the garage would have cedar log siding to match the home. Associate Heller reported the garage could be no higher than 18 feet to the peak. Chair Stevenson closed the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. Commissioner Schiltgen requested further information about how the new driveway would be configured. Mr. Pelton stated the original driveway was 80 feet in length and would be continued another 40 feet along the existing garage to the new garage. Commissioner Love asked if the current driveway would remain in place. Mr. Pelton stated the existing cement driveway in front of the house would remain as is. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting April 16, 2014 Page 4 Commissioner Love inquired if the City or the watershed district had any guidelines regarding the additional impervious surface. Associate Heller commented the restrictions regarding impervious surfaces only came into effect when covering more than an acre. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Schiltgen/Commissioner Elofson. To approve Resolution 998-14, a Resolution Recommending Approval of the Conditional Use Permit for an Oversize Garage; Planning Case No. MU2014-001-CU-1. Ayes — 7 Nays — 0 Motion carried. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Love/Commissioner Birken. To approve Resolution 999- 14, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Variance for a Reduced Driveway Setback; Planning Case No. MU2014-001-VR-1. Ayes — 7 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 6. Other Planning Activity A. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion Planning Associate Heller reviewed the changes made to the overlay district Ordinance since the last Planning Commission meeting with the Commission in detail. She recommended cultured stone be included as an acceptable building material. Chair Stevenson questioned if the Commission really wanted to require that 50% of all four sides of buildings along the corridor be brick faced. Commissioner Carvelli-Yu and Commissioner Birken supported this requirement. Associate Heller stated this requirement would improve the quality of the developments along the corridor. Associate Heller recommended the Commission hold a joint meeting with the City Council on June 2, 2014 to further discuss the overlay district Ordinance. 7. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. May 7, 2014 B. May 21, 2014 Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 8. Review Minutes: A. April 2, 2014 April 16, 2014 Page 5 The Commission discussed the April 2, 2014 meeting minutes. No changes were made. 9. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. She explained the Commission would be reviewing the sign ordinance at a future meeting. She reported Coventry Senior Living was pouring walls and the car wash would be removed in the near future. 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports None. 11. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 7:54 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: April 16, 2014 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases A. VR2014-002 Variance for 8 -foot Fence in Second Front Yard of a Corner Lot Applicant: Michael Winkel Address: 7701 Bona Road B. VR2014-003 Variance for a 6 -foot Fence in Second Front Yard of a Corner Lot Applicant: Blaine Fyksen Address: 5045 Eastwood Road C. VR2014-004 Variance for a Second Curb Cut Applicant: Frands Jensen Address: 7800 Groveland Road 6. Other Planning Activity Um01reMOM 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, June 4, 2014 B. Wednesday, June 18, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. May 7, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion Item No: 5A MOUNDS OT TA DS VfE— j Meeting Date: May 21, 2014 V1�IlJ ♦ L � � Type of Business: Public Hearing City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Consideration of a Variance to Allow an Eight -Foot Tall Fence in the Front Yard of 7701 Bona Road; Planning Case VR2014-002 Introduction: The applicant, Mike Winkel, is requesting a variance to install an 8 -foot tall fence in the "second front yard" of his corner lot located at 7701 Bona Road. The property is located at the southeast corner of Bona Road and County Road I. Since two streets border corner lots, they have two front yards. As such, the City Code requirement for front yard applies to two sides of the property, which means that corner lots to have additional limitations. The Zoning Code indicates that no fence in front of the front line of a building in a residential district may exceed four feet in height. The applicant would preferto have an 8 -foot tall wood fence for screening from County Road I since his yard is a little lower than the sidewalk, and thus has applied for the variance. Discussion: The applicant currently has a 6 -foot fence in the second front yard area but it needs to be replaced, and he wants to expand the fence to the front line of the garage (see attached site plan). A permit for the existing fence was issued by the City in 1981. According to the Municipal Code, Section 1103.08, Subdivision 3, fences of a height greater than 48 inches (4 feet) are not allowed in the front yard of a property without a variance. The Zoning Code also establishes a sight triangle that limits all obstructions within the area at the corner of intersections, measured thirty (30) feet from the point where the property lines meet at the intersection of two streets. The proposed fence would not be located within the sight triangle. Variance Considerations: For the City to approve this variance, as with any variance request, there needs to be demonstrated practical difficulty associated with the property that makes a literal interpretation of the Code overly burdensome or restrictive to a property owner. State statutes require that the governing body (the Planning Commission) review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. The City has set these criteria in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. The Code clearly states that a hardship exists when all of the criteria are met. The individual criteria and a staff comment about each are as follows: a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of these regulations. The property at 7701 Bona Road is a corner lot, which is not in itself unique; however, the applicant seeks permission to have an 8 -foot tall fence for the purpose of privacy and screening from busy County Road I. This property is across the street from several apartment buildings which create a lot of vehicle and pedestrian traffic, and there is a sidewalk along County Road I, adjacent to the applicant's property. The applicant's yard is a couple of feet below the sidewalk level, so he would like to install an 8 -foot fence to compensate for the grade difference. The taller fence would provide privacy and security for this property. 7701 Bona Road Variance Report May 21, 2014 Page 2 b. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan supports improvements to properties. The applicant, owning a corner lot, is at a disadvantage to improve the property as other homeowners might because the property has two front yards. Every property owner has the right to apply for a variance to improve the function and livability of their property. C. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Title or the City Code. The applicant cannot control the fact that his property is a corner lot with two front setbacks. The corner lots are much more restricted by the City Code and many times the resident's use and privacy of the property is limited because of these restrictions. d. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this Title has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. Granting the variance would not confer upon the property owner a special privilege in that most property owners do not have to work with these setback constraints. The City has approved similar variances for taller fences in front yard areas of corner lots that are along busier streets. e. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The fence is setback about 35 feet from the edge of the County Road I pavement so it should not impact any sight lines, including the view for vehicles going south from Bona and turning onto County Road 1. f. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The four foot variance is the minimum variance needed since the Zoning Code limits front yard fence heights to four feet. g. The Planning Commission may impose such conditions upon the premises benefited by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established by this Title or to reduce or minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Staff does not have any suggested conditions. A zoning permit is required for the fence installation. 7701 Bona Road Variance Report May 21, 2014 Page 3 Based upon the review of the above criteria, it appears to staff that the requested variance does satisfy the practical difficulty threshold. Public Hearing: As with any requested variance, a public hearing is required. City staff mailed notices to all property owners within 350 feet of 7701 Bona Road. Staff has not received any comments as of May 16, 2014. Recommendation: After holding the public hearing and taking testimony from staff, the applicant and any neighbors, the Commission should take one of the following actions: 1. Approve the variance as requested. Resolution 1003-14 is attached for the Commission's approval if they so choose. 2. Deny the requested variance. To move forward with this option, the Commission should direct staff to draft a resolution of denial with findings of fact appropriate to support the denial. I 3. Table the request. If the Commission needs more information before making a decision or if more discussion is needed, the Commission can table the request until they are provided such information. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Photo 3. Statement from Applicant 4. Photographic Documentation 5. Corner Lot Fence Diagram 6. Resolution 1003-13 ZONING MAP W Y g 0 Z 0 3 1 9 7 5 1 9 7 1 * Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential Aerial View Per City Code- only the RED line area can have a fence more than 4 -feet tall without a variance. The YELLOW lines are where the applicant is requesting a variance to install an 8 -foot tall privacy fence. :* Site plan from Applicant PLOT PLAN Address Owners\� ���r�s,A� W •,,,��u Builder_ "�-���� Brief Description of Proposed Constructionl�vz�� p, — I Building Permit ♦ Show all existing buildings/structures located on the property ♦ Show all proposed construction ♦ Indicate distance from proposed structure(s) to all property lines ♦ Indicate distance of proposed structure(s) to existing structures ♦ Show street location(s) and name(s) CALL SII I BEFORE YOU DICI IT'S FREE, AND IT'S THE LAW! -tv o a.�*- 1`Vl SL ! Applicant's • 7701 Bona KA City Code Permitted Fence Location for Corner Lots ----------- I I NOTES: (See 1 - 3 above) I F -1 '7-�Front Line of House .................................. Fence Heights: ----- 8'orless ....................... 4' or less Chain Link House Only chain link fences 4' tall or less are allowed within 30' of a property corner formed by two street right of ways. Front Line of House Street Frontage 30' 30' MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1003-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR AN EIGHT -FOOT TALL FENCE IN THE SOUTH FRONT YARD OF 7701 BONA ROAD; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE VR2014-002 WHEREAS, the applicant, Michael Winkel, has applied for a variance to allow an eight - foot tall fence in the south front yard (near County Road 1) of his property at 7701 Bona Road; and, WHEREAS, 7701 Bona Road is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and legally described as follows: Greenfield, The South 110 feet of the West % of Lot 11, Block 2. Subject to Road Easements; Ramsey County, Minnesota PIN: 05-30-23-33-0036 WHEREAS, Section 1103.08 of the Mounds View Zoning Code indicates that the maximum height of a fence in a front yard four feet (4'); and, WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to allow an eight foot (8) fence in the front yard abutting County Road I; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents about this proposal: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Photo 3. Photographic Documentation 4. Staff Report WHEREAS, the purpose of the variance provision in the Zoning Code is to give relief to property owners when the strict enforcement of the zoning code requirements imposes a hardship thereby restricting the improvement of property due to practical difficulties brought about by unique or extraordinary features of the physical property that are beyond the property owner's control; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on Wednesday, May 21, 2014, about this variance request; and, WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria that must be satisfied in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. Resolution 1003-14 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings related to this request: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient practical difficulty with regard to the property located at 7701 Bona Road, and makes the following findings of fact related to its decision: The general intent of the Zoning Code regarding limited fence heights in front yards is to not close off the front of the property from the visual openness of the street, but yet still allow a fence for safety and some sense of privacy for the property owners. This becomes difficult on corner lots, particularly lots on busy streets, where the property owners really want the privacy due to the high traffic along one of their front yards. 2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the applicant is improving the property. 3. The applicant is requesting this variance because the front yard height limitations would preclude having a fence tall enough to provide security, screening and buffering from busy County Road I. 4. The unique feature of this property is that it is a corner lot with two front yards, and there is a sidewalk along County Road I that is adjacent to the applicant's property. 5. The 8 -foot tall fence in the front yard should not change the existing neighborhood character or cause visibility problems for traffic. 6. The 4 -foot variance is the minimum variance required to alleviate the applicant's practical difficulty since the Zoning Code limits front yard fence heights to four feet. 7. The Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the premises as may be necessary to comply with city standards and to minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission, based upon the above findings, does hereby approve the variance request for a six- foot tall fence in the south front yard of 7701 Bona Road. Adopted this 21st day of May, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) MOUNDS VIEW City of Mounds View Staff Item No: 513 Meeting Date: MaV 21 2014 Type of Business: Public Hearinq To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Consideration of a Variance to Allow a Six -Foot Tall Fence in the Front Yard of 5045 Eastwood Road; Planning Case VR2014-003 Introduction: The applicant, Blaine Fyksen, is requesting a variance to install a 6 -foot tall fence in the "second front yard" of his corner lot located at 5045 Eastwood Road. The property is located at the southwest corner of Eastwood Road and County Road H. Since two streets border corner lots, they have two front yards. As such, the City Code requirement for front yard applies to two sides of the property, which means that corner lots to have additional limitations. The Zoning Code indicates that no fence in front of the front line of a building in a residential district may exceed four feet in height. The applicant would prefer to have a 6 -foot tall wood fence for screening from County Road H, and thus has applied for the variance. Discussion: The applicant currently has a 4 -foot chain link fence in the second front yard area but it offers little security and no screening. A sidewalk will be installed along County Road H, adjacent to the applicant's property in the near future. According to the Municipal Code, Section 1103.08, Subdivision 3, fences of a height greater than 48 inches (4 feet) are not allowed in the front yard of a property without a variance. The Zoning Code also establishes a sight triangle that limits all obstructions within the area at the corner of intersections, measured thirty (30) feet from the point where the property lines meet at the intersection of two streets. The proposed fence would not be located within the sight triangle. Variance Considerations: For the City to approve this variance, as with any variance request, there needs to be demonstrated practical difficulty associated with the property that makes a literal interpretation of the Code overly burdensome or restrictive to a property owner. State statutes require that the governing body (the Planning Commission) review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. The City has set these criteria in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. The Code clearly states that a hardship exists when all of the criteria are met. The individual criteria and a staff comment about each are as follows: The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of these regulations. The property at 5045 Eastwood Road is a corner lot, which is not in itself unique; however, the applicant seeks permission to have a 6 -foot tall fence for the purpose of privacy and screening from busy County Road H. This property is very close to Sunnyside School which creates a lot of vehicle and pedestrian traffic, and there will be a sidewalk along County Road H, adjacent to the applicant's property within the next year or two. The taller fence would provide privacy and security for this property. 5045 Eastwood Road Variance Repod May 21, 2094 Page 2 b. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan supports improvements to properties. The applicant, owning a corner lot, is at a disadvantage to improve the property as other homeowners might because the property has two front yards. Every property owner has the right to apply for a variance to improve the function and livability of their property. C. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Title or the City Code. The applicant cannot control the fact that his property is a corner lot with two front setbacks. The corner lots are much more restricted by the City Code and many times the resident's use and privacy of the property is limited because of these restrictions. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this Title has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. Granting the variance would not confer upon the property owner a special privilege in that most property owners do not have to work with these setback constraints. The City has approved similar variances for taller fences in front yard areas of corner lots that are along busier streets. The applicant's lot is smaller than the current minimum lot size, so the majority of the yard space available is on the south side of the house. e. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The fence will be setback about 16 feet from the edge of the County Road H pavement so it should not impact any sight lines, including the view for vehicles going south from Eastwood and turning onto County Road H. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The two foot variance is the minimum variance needed since the Zoning Code limits front yard fence heights to four feet. g. The Planning Commission may impose such conditions upon the premises benefited by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established by this Title or to reduce or minimize the effect of such variance upon otherproperties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Staff does not have any suggested conditions. A zoning permit is required for the fence installation. 5045 Eastwood Road Variance Report May 21, 2014 Page 3 Based upon the review of the above criteria, it appears to staff that the requested variance does satisfy the practical difficulty threshold. Public Hearing: As with any requested variance, a public hearing is required. City staff mailed notices to all property owners within 350 feet of 5045 Eastwood Road. Staff has not received any comments as of May 16, 2014. Recommendation: After holding the public hearing and taking testimony from staff, the applicant and any neighbors, the Commission should take one of the following actions: 1. Approve the variance as requested. Resolution 1004-14 is attached for the Commission's approval if they so choose. 2. Deny the requested variance. To move forward with this option, the Commission should direct staff to draft a resolution of denial with findings of fact appropriate to support the denial. 3. Table the request. If the Commission needs more information before making a decision or if more discussion is needed, the Commission can table the request until they are provided such information. Respectfully submitted, (A "i'w Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Photo 3. Statement from Applicant 4. Photographic Documentation 5. Corner Lot Fence Diagram 6. Resolution 1004-13 Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential ZONING MAP 5092 nvvul.R 5092 5091 1 5092 5091 5092 tO 517f 0 517 509 pp 525 a in N .F m �o w w n r%5 rry m co cV iJ rn so �o rn oN mo ONNN 5086 5085 52� O 5086 508 5088 5254 O N io N N N m N N N N N N N N 3 n vlm in v>u� Z p 5080 5079 517 517 > 5248 524 � v V v Co n r7 N N nl N N N o N Zl�,1 wgnMM�IM 3 aO 0: 52: O 5072 5071 3 5068 506 Z 50( N N N N N N N S25 z W� 50065 506 521 5062 5061 9 517 517 O 5242 52 CLFARVIEW 505 5506 061 506 505 AVE fY v`�ivNivNin v`"i�vNi 50 5059 5060 5059IY 5056 505 5236 523 N �, Z O M M 505 505 N i� 5054 5053 o o mO(��ry]a m0 NNWom 5053 , 5053 (7 5048 517"517 50 523 23 N N N N 'NO N N N N N N N 4 5045— 1 5170 516 5230 522 CountyRoadH — — —} a -----. V I7 '� r N N in U) In L N E W B R I 5224 22 co 0 N N N N N N N Co N N N N N 516 516 5213 5221LANE N RIDGE N N N Z J 5166516 521 5212 521 7 m 521 521 N mo 0 0 u°Di u'1i LLJ 5212 5211 Co N M N to N N N N N N 516 516 Yd 5206 5208 5207 5206 5207 5206 m m N 52 0 5205 m N N N N N N 5162 5161 5200 5200 5201 5200 5201 W 520 N N 5201 5175 WOOD DR 51• OODALE D 5148 5148 5149 51 5149 514 0 514 5149 5165 5152 5155 515 515 W 51 n N N 5140 5141 5140 5141 5140 5141 5140 51; 5132 5132 5133 5132 513 5132 5155 514 5141 x O 514 514 51 5139 5133 5145 O 5132 5135 513 5133 5124 W 512505124— 5125 5124 512 5124 W 5135 513 51; 512 5116 5117 5116 5117 5116 5117 5116 5125 5128 5131 512 512 51 09DICR T 5119 5108 5109 Z 5108 5109 5108 510 5108 5115 5118 5115 5114 511 PARK 5113 ain� 5100 5LO 101 5100 5101 5100 5101 iv l0 5105 5108 5107 5106 °n' 510 Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential 5091 5092 w 5092 nvvul.R 5092 5091 1 5092 5091 5092 tO N 5091 509 5092 5086 cni 508 5086 508 5086 5085 5086 508 5088 508 508 508 50f 50850 5086 1 508 507 5080 507 508 5080 5080 5079 Z E5065O59§ 5080 5079 00 5080 507 O O 507 507 50_ 507 5071 5072 5071 507 507 5072 5071 O1 3 5072 5071 O 5072 5071 3 5068 506 Z 50( 1 506 5065 5066 506 508 5066 5065 S25 z 5066 50065 506 506 5062 5061 9 50f s6s 5060 505 5506 061 506 505 5060 5059 In 50 5059 5060 5059IY 5056 505 50: ES Z O 505 5053 505 505 5054 5053 5054 5053 5 5 5053 pg4 5053 (7 5048 505 50 J 5046 5045 50 504 5046 5045 5046 5045 04 5045 4 5045— _--------------- CountyRoadH — — —} -----. ` N E W B R I G H T c Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential Aerial View Per City Code- only the RED line area can have a fence more than 4 -feet tall without a variance. The YELLOW lines are where the applicant is requesting a variance to install an 8 -foot tall privacy fence. Site plan from Applicant -60 V5 C,?.s %vY p a 490. "Highlighted area indicates where new fence would be located. r} S City Code Permitted Fence Location for Corner Lots -------------------------�...................... Fence Heights: ----- 8'orless .NOTES: ........................ 4' or less (See 1 — 3 above) Chain Link ............................................ : Garage Front Line of House \�Front /ice Only chain link fences 4' tall or less are Line allowed within 30' of a property corner 30' Housea formed by two street right of ways. .............................................................................................................. Street Frontage 30' i MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1004-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR A SIX-FOOT TALL FENCE IN THE SOUTH FRONT YARD OF 5045 EASTWOOD ROAD; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE VR2014-003 WHEREAS, the applicant, Blaine Fyksen, has applied for a variance to allow a six-foot tall fence in the south front yard (near County Road H) of his property at 5045 Eastwood Road; and, WHEREAS, 5045 Eastwood Road is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and legally described as follows: Twelve Oaks, Lot 8, Block 3, Ramsey County, Minnesota PIN 07-30-23-44-0075 WHEREAS, Section 1103.08 of the Mounds View Zoning Code indicates that the maximum height of a fence in a front yard four feet (4'); and, WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to allow a six foot (6) fence in the front yard abutting County Road H; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents about this proposal: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Photo 3. Photographic Documentation 4. Staff Report WHEREAS, the purpose of the variance provision in the Zoning Code is to give relief to property owners when the strict enforcement of the zoning code requirements imposes a hardship thereby restricting the improvement of property due to practical difficulties brought about by unique or extraordinary features of the physical property that are beyond the property owner's control; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on Wednesday, May 21, 2014, about this variance request; and, WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria that must be satisfied in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. Resolution 1004-14 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings related to this request: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient practical difficulty with regard to the property located at 5045 Eastwood Road, and makes the following findings of fact related to its decision: 1. The general intent of the Zoning Code regarding limited fence heights in front yards is to not close off the front of the property from the visual openness of the street, but yet still allow a fence for safety and some sense of privacy for the property owners. This becomes difficult on corner lots, particularly lots on busy streets, where the property owners really want the privacy due to the high traffic along one of their front yards. 2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the applicant is improving the property. 3. The applicant is requesting this variance because the front yard height limitations would preclude having a fence tall enough to provide security, screening and buffering from busy County Road H. 4. The unique feature of this property is that it is a small corner lot with two front yards, on a busy road. 5. The 6 -foot tall fence in the front yard should not change the existing neighborhood character or cause visibility problems for traffic. 6. The 2 -foot variance is the minimum variance required to alleviate the applicant's practical difficulty since the Zoning Code limits front yard fence heights to four feet. 7. The Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the premises as may be necessary to comply with city standards and to minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission, based upon the above findings, does hereby approve the variance requestfor a six- foot tall fence in the south front yard of 5045 Eastwood Road. Adopted this 21St day of May, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) M0Fr 7�T Item No: 5C UNDS VIEW Meeting Date: May 21, 2014 Type of Business: Public Hearing City of Mounds View .Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Consideration of a Variance to allow a Second Curb Cut and Driveway at 7800 Groveland Road; Planning Case VR14-004 Introduction: The applicant, Frands Jensen, property owner of 7800 Groveland Road, is requesting a variance to allow a second curb cut and driveway on his property. The City Code allows one curb cut on each R-1, Single Family Residential zoned property without a variance. Discussion: The house at 7800 Groveland Road is on the corner of Groveland Road and Oakwood Drive. The applicant purchased the house in 2013 and built a detached garage that faces Oakwood Drive. The applicant and contractor were informed by City Staff at the time of the building permit application that a second curb cut was not allowed for single-family homes. The applicant parks a trailer in the detached garage and wants the driveway so that he does not need to drive over the curb to access the garage. The applicant could install a partial driveway from the garage up to five feet from the property line, which would be considered a parking area. The Code just does not allow the second curb cut opening at the street. For the Planning Commission to act favorably toward this application, there must be a demonstrated hardship or practical difficulty associated with the property that makes a literal interpretation of the Code overly burdensome or restrictive to a property owner. This is true for all variance requests. State statutes require that the governing body review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. These criteria are set forth in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. The Code clearly states that a hardship exists when all of the criteria are met. The individual criteria, with responses, are as follows: a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of these regulations. While it is true that some lots do have two curb cuts, there are not many of them. While there are a few properties with two curb cuts on a corner lot, it is even less common to see properties with two completely separate driveways. Staff feels that limiting the applicant to one curb cut would not be depriving him of something commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district. b. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address this specific of an issue, but traffic safety and management is an important function for the City. By limiting access points onto the streets, there are less traffic movements and the streets are safer. 7800 Groveland Road 2°d Driveway Variance Report May 21, 2014 Page 2 C. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Title or the City Code. The applicant would use the second driveway to access the detached garage on his property and not need to drive over the City street curb. The applicant was informed that a second driveway was not allowed prior to building the garage in the current location, and knew he would have to drive over the curb. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this Title has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. There are no unique circumstances associated with this property. The applicant built the detached garage for his trailer, and had been informed prior to construction of the garage that second curb cuts were not allowed. e. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. There are no other single-family properties in the neighborhood with two curb cuts. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Adding the second curb cut is the minimum variance possible to alleviate what the applicant has stated is his difficulty. g. The Planning Commission may impose such conditions upon the premises benefited by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established by this Title or to reduce or minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Staff has no recommended conditions. Public Hearing: As with any requested variance, this application requires a public hearing. Staff mailed notices to all property owners within 350 feet of the applicant's property and a notice was published in the Sun Focus newspaper on Friday, May 9, 2014. Staff has not received any comments as of May 16, 2014. 7800 Groveland Road 2"d Driveway Variance Report May 21, 2014 Page 3 Recommendation: Staff recommends holding the public hearing and taking testimony from staff, the applicant and the public. The Commission may take one of the following actions related to the request: 1. Approve the variance as requested. Staff does not support this action as the review of the practical difficulty criteria appear to not warrant approval. If however the Commission believes practical difficulty is evident, you would need to direct staff to prepare a resolution of approval which clearly outlines the basis of hardship. 2. Deny the variance request. Staff has prepared a resolution of denial based on its review of the practical difficulty criteria which does not appear to justify approval. 3. Table the request. If the Planning Commission needs more information before making a decision or if they decide there is a need for more discussion, the Commission can simply move to table the request until such information has been provided. Respectfully /S`u`bmitted By, � Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Photos 3. Photographic Documentation 4. Resolution 1005-14 ZONING MAP '835 825 815 7897 7887 t 0 7880 773 7879 7739 p 7729 7835 W n 7755 772 000 7729 7960 7965 7870 N77 773 7735 795 7955 7860 I rn N N 7850 780 821 7 01 7850 ZZ 7841 ��� 7719 N 7934 7715 7933 7791 o V) bye rn C) cl I 7821 CM 7932 7781 776 R 40 778 J - N R-3 10 N N 7775 7758 7759 7770 7771 77481 7749 7768 7767 791 00 N 930 ., 7aa 7RRF I — 7861 M/ N 7880 773 7879 7739 p 7729 7835 W 7755 772 3 7729 7� 5 7870 N77 773 7735 B 7860 7851 N N 7850 780 821 7 01 7850 ZZ 7841 ��� 7719 7718 7715 7791 coZ V) bye rn 783 7821 CM 7781 7781 776 7711 7769 778 J 7785 7773 7775 7758 7759 7770 7771 77481 7749 7768 7767 7765 930 ., j La ke �.RP R -4j7750 / * Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential 773 7739 p 7729 W 7755 772 3 7729 7728 5 7723 N77 773 7735 771 p 7719 7718 7715 L coZ 71 7710 Y 7709 7710 7711 N 70 J 7692 W ., 7aa 7RRF I * Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential i ve�acnea garage '•r 2841 7800, Av : A V-- r III lz -v MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1005-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FOR A SECOND CURB CUT AT 7800 GROVELAND ROAD; PLANNING CASE VR2014-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, Frands Jensen, property owner of 7800 Groveland Road, has applied for a variance to allow a second curb cut on his property; and, WHEREAS, 7800 Groveland Road is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and is legally described as follows: Haluptzok's Terrace, Lot 1, Block 1, Ramsey County, Minnesota PIN 06-30-23-34-0026 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial View 3. Photographic Documentation 4. Staff Report WHEREAS, the purpose of the variance provision in the Zoning Code is to give relief to property owners when the strict enforcement of the zoning code requirements imposes a hardship thereby restricting the improvement of property due to practical difficulties brought about by unique or extraordinary features of the physical property that are beyond the property owner's control; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly -noticed public hearing regarding this request on May 21, 2014; and, WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all must be satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that all of the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code are not satisfied, and finds there notto be sufficient practical difficulty with regard to the property located at 7800 Groveland Road, and makes the following findings of fact related to its decision: Resolution 1005-14 Page 2 1. Section 1121.09 Subdivision 5e of the Zoning Code states that single-family lots shall be limited to one curb cut per property unless it is in the interest of public safety to waive such. There are no public safety issues with this property that would cause the owner to need two curb cuts. 2. The Comprehensive Plan supports good traffic management for safer vehicle movements on streets. Limiting the number of access points onto a street is one of the ways that the City accomplishes this. 3. Second curb cuts for single-family homes are rare and not desired by the City for traffic safety reasons. 4. There are no unique circumstances for this property. The applicant built the second garage and now wants a second curb cut for easier access to it. 5. There are no other single-family properties in the neighborhood with two curb cuts, and granting the variance would be materially detrimental to the purpose of the Zoning Code or to other property in the R-1, Single -Family Residential zoning district. 6. Adding the second curb cut is the minimum variance possible to alleviate what the applicant has stated is his difficulty. 7. There are no conditions recommended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission, based upon the above findings, denies the variance request of Frands Jensen, property owner of 7800 Groveland Road, to allow a second curb cut on his property. Adopted this 21St day of May, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting May 7, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Schiltgen at 7:00 p.m. for May 7, 2014. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Birken, Elofson, Rundle, and Schiltgen. Absent and Excused: Commissioners Caivelli-Yu, Love and Stevenson. Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller. Index to Minutes Page Approval of Minutes 1 VR2014-001 Consideration of Variance Additional Wall Signage 2 MA2014-001 Consideration of Major Subdivision of Longview 2 Estates into 10 Lots Review Sign Code Amendment, Chapter 1008.10 4 3. Approval of Minutes April 2, 2014. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Birken. To approve the Minutes of the April 2, 2014 regular Planning Commission meeting as presented. Ayes — 4 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. 5. Planning Cases May 7, 2014 Page 2 A. VR2014-001 Consideration of Variance for Additional Wall Signage Applicant: Chad Mason, Allegiance Fitness Address: 2240 Woodale Drive Planning Associate Heller requested the Commission consider a variance for Chad Mason with Allegiance Fitness at 2240 Woodale Drive to allow for additional wall signage. She reported the business has two primary building sides and two building entrances facing the parking lot, and would like to add a 120 square foot sign facing County Road 10 and a 39 square foot sign above each entrance. The signage would assist people in finding their building. Staff did not object to the request and recommended approval of the variance for additional wall signage for Allegiance Fitness. Vice Chair Schiltgen opened the public hearing at 7:09 p.m. Vice Chair Schiltgen requested further information on the temporary sign. Associate Heller explained that businesses were allowed to have several temporary signs on a yearly basis. She believed that the applicant wouldn't need temporary signs as much after the new wall signage was put in place. Vice Chair Schiltgen closed the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. Vice Chair Schiltgen questioned when the wall signs would be placed on the building. Chad Mason, Allegiance Fitness at 2240 Woodale Drive, anticipated the signs would be attached to the building in the next five or six weeks. He appreciated the Commission's consideration noting the new signs would greatly assist his clients in locating his business. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Elofson. To approve Resolution 1001-14, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Variance for Additional Wall Signage; Planning Case No. VR2014-001. Ayes — 4 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 3 B. MA2014-001 Consideration of Major Subdivision of Longview Estates into 10 Lots Applicant: Eichi, Inc., Marty Harstad Address: 2195 Silver Lake Road Planning Associate Heller indicated Marty Harstad was requesting to subdivide a seven acre vacant parcel into 10 single-family lots. The location of the property was described by staff. She commented the plat would be known as Longview Estates. Staff discussed the subdivision in further detail and recommended approval of the request. Martin Harstad, 2195 Silver Lake Road, stated he was one of the family members that owned this property. He commented he had already received approval on the subdivision from the Rice Creek Watershed District. He reported sewer and water stubs were installed for each of these lots back in the 1960's, along with a storm sewer pipe. He discussed how the storm water would be treated prior to being discharged into the wetland. It was noted the current rain gardens would be moved slightly but remain on the property. He indicated behind the homes there would be a boulder retaining wall to keep property owners from infringing on the wetland. He reported he had one builder that would constrict homes on each of the 10 lots. Vice Chair Schiltgen questioned the timeline for the proposed subdivision. Mr. Harstad anticipated that soil corrections would take place over the next 30 days. The builder would love to begin homes shortly thereafter. He reported most utilities were already onsite. Commissioner Elofson expressed concern with the proposed development and the destruction of the wetlands. He believed there had to be another solution to save the wetlands. Mr. Harstad indicated storm water from the streets was already draining into the wetland and he was proposing to improve the water quality. While a portion of the wetland would be filled, he explained he had purchased twice as much space, as a wetland credit, to make up for the small amount of wetland on this site that would be removed. In the end, better wetlands would be created. He reported that Rice Creels Watershed had supported this plan. Commissioner Rundle indicated that a lot of wetland would still remain on this subdivision. Commissioner Birken questioned if the future residents that lived on these lots would be frustrated with the fact they would not be able to put a play structure or shed in their rear yard. Mr. Harstad commented the future residents would be informed that the wetland, which is designated as an easement on the plat, could not be encroached upon. He explained the boulder wall would assist in creating a barrier to encroachment. Associate Heller indicated that residents requesting building permits or an accessory structure would be told that they are not able to place anything in the easement area. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting May 7, 2014 Page 4 Commissioner Elofson recommended the Commission reconsider this request as additional wetland would be lost. Mr. Harstad explained he was trying to work with the City to create a best case scenario and wanted to create a pleasing development for the neighborhood. He discussed the amount of wetland that would remain within the subdivision and believed the proposed subdivision was a great compromise between the amount of woods and wetlands that would remain. He indicated he had rights as a property owner as well. Commissioner Elofson questioned the value of the site once fully developed. Associate Heller anticipated that the value of the 10 lots would be at least $2 million once fully developed. Commissioner Birken inquired where the utilities would be located. Associate Heller noted all utilities would be located along Longview. Commissioner Birken stated she too did not like to see the City's wetlands decreasing. She asked if the pond would be fenced. Mr. Harstad indicated the pond would not be fenced. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Birken. To approve Resolution 1002-14, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Preliminary Plat for the Major Subdivision of Longview Estates into 10 Lots; Planning Case No. MA2014-001. Ayes — 4 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 6. Other Planning Activity A. Review Sign Code Amendment, Chapter 1008.10 Planning Associate Heller reviewed a proposed sign code amendment to Chapter 1008 of City Code. She explained this section addresses dynamic display signs and the blending or movement of the screen. It was noted dynamic signs would not be allowed to blink or flash. Commissioner Birken supported the proposed changes to the Sign Code. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Birken/Commissioner Elofson. To approve Resolution 1000-14, a Resolution Recommending a Sign Code Amendment to Chapter 1008.10 about Dynamic Display Signs; Special Planning Case SP -190-14. Ayes — 4 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. May 21, 2014 B. June 4, 2014 May 7, 2014 Page 5 8. Review Minutes: A. April 16, 2014 The Commission discussed the April 16, 2014 meeting minutes. No changes were made. 9. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. She noted on Monday, June 2, 2014 there would be a joint meeting between the Council and Planning Commission. 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports None. 11. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Vice Chair Schiltgen adjourned the meeting at 8:11 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. tt MOUNDS VIEW 7 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA June 4, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: May 7, 2014 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases A. VR2014-004 Variance for a Second Curb Cut - revote Applicant: Francis Jensen Address: 7800 Groveland Road B. VR2011-002 & VR2011-005 Variance Extensions for Reduced Driveway Setback Applicant: Michael Kinyon Address: 5338-5340 Raymond Avenue & 5380-5382 Raymond Avenue C. VR2014-005 Variance for 6 foot Fence in Second Front Yard of a Corner Lot Applicant: Ron O'Connell Address: 2296 Terrace Drive 6. Other Planning Activity r.&=\rem 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, June 18, 2014 B. Wednesday, July 2, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. May 21, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases i 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion MOtnvns VIEW �) City of Mounds View Staff Re Item No: 5A Meeting Date: June 4, 2014 Type of Business: Planning Case To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: REVOTE: Consideration of a Variance to allow a Second Curb Cut at 7800 Groveland Road; Planning Case VR14-004 Introduction: The applicant, Frands Jensen, property owner of 7800 Groveland Road, is requesting a variance to allow a second curb cut and driveway on his property. The City Code allows one curb cut on each R-1, Single Family Residential zoned property without a variance. This case was discussed at the May 21, 2014 Planning Commission meeting and a vote was taken to act on a resolution which denied the variance. There were six Commissioners in attendance and the vote was 3-3, so the motion to deny the variance did not pass. The case was tabled until the June 4, 2014 meeting for another vote. For any variance to be approved there must be a majority 2/3 vote (At least 5 of 7 votes are needed to approve a variance). Discussion: The house at 7800 Groveland Road is on the corner of Groveland Road and Oakwood Drive. The applicant purchased the house in 2013 and built a detached garage that faces Oakwood Drive. The applicant and contractor were informed by City Staff at the time of the building permit application that a second curb cut was not allowed for single-family homes. The applicant parks a trailer in the detached garage and wants the driveway so that he does not need to drive over the curb to access the garage. The applicant could install a partial driveway from the garage up to five feet from the property line, which would be considered a parking area. The Code just does not allow the second curb cut opening at the street. For the Planning Commission to act favorably toward this application, there must be a demonstrated hardship or practical difficulty associated with the property that makes a literal interpretation of the Code overly burdensome or restrictive to a property owner. This is true for all variance requests. State statutes require that the governing body review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. These criteria are set forth in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. The Code clearly states that a hardship exists when all of the criteria are met. The individual criteria, with responses, are as follows: a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of these regulations. While it is true that some lots do have two curb cuts, there are not many of them. While there are a few properties with two curb cuts on a corner lot, it is even less common to see properties with two completely separate driveways. Staff feels that limiting the applicant to one curb cut would not be depriving him of something commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district. 7800 Groveland Roar) 2nd Driveway Variance Report June 4. 2014 Page 2 b. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address this specific of an issue, but traffic safety and management is an important function for the City. By limiting access points onto the streets, there are less traffic movements and the streets are safer. C. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Title or the City Code. The applicant would use the second driveway to access the detached garage on his property and not need to drive over the City street curb. The applicant was informed that a second driveway was not allowed prior to building the garage in the current location, and knew he would have to drive over the curb. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this Title has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. There are no unique circumstances associated with this property. The applicant built the detached garage for his trailer, and had been informed prior to construction of the garage that second curb cuts were not allowed. e. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. There are no other single-family properties in the neighborhood with two curb cuts. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Adding the second curb cut is the minimum variance possible to alleviate what the applicant has stated is his difficulty. The Planning Commission may impose such conditions upon the premises benefited by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established by this Title or to reduce or minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. If the variance were to be approved, Staff recommends limiting the curb cut width to a maximum of 20 feet, which is the width of the detached garage. 7800 Groveland Road 2°d Driveway Variance Report June 4, 2014 Page 3 Public Hearing: A public hearing was held at the May 21, 2014 Planning Commission meeting and there were no comments at that time. Staff mailed notices to all property owners within 350 feet of the applicant's property and a notice was published in the Sun Focus newspaper on Friday, May 9, 2014. Staff has not received any comments as of May 30, 2014. Recommendation: Staff recommends taking testimony from staff and the applicant. The Commission may take one of the following actions related to the request: 1. Approve the variance as requested. Staff does not support this action as the review of the practical difficulty criteria appear to not warrant approval. At the last Planning Commission meeting, the Commission directed staff to draft a resolution of approval which outlines the basis of hardship. 2. Deny the variance request. Staff has prepared a resolution of denial based on its review of the practical difficulty criteria which does not appear to justify approval. 3. Table the request. If the Planning Commission needs more information before making a decision or if they decide there is a need for more discussion, the Commission can simply move to table the request until such information has been provided. Respectfully Submitted By, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Photos 3. Photographic Documentation 4. Resolution 1005-14, denial and approval versions ZONING MAP t D n N 7960 7965 `N �795 7955 II I N d N 7934 7933 C) 1 7932 2 4. '000---- N R-� O O N N 7897 m 791 N N 835 7890 7887— — 2 0 _ 7861 N 825 7880 7879 7835 dP 815 7870 7850 821 B 3 $& `L 780 7860 7851 ` 7850 7841 qQ9 N N 780 7 01 - a. `� _ Y .7791 R-4 783C 7821 7799 7781 7750 r 7768o7769 778 7785 7775 7758 7759 7770 7771 0Q 7748 7749 7768 7767 771 a 7765 7738 7739 0 7729 773 W 773 Y 7755 772 3 7729 772 0 7723 -1 7735 773 g 7735 - a La k e 771EO 7719 771 7715 72 W Z Co 71 °' 7710 Y 7709 7710 7711 N 770 cn va R °nO�Baa 7an� 7692 F'� " Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential rroposea z curb cut location All r Sal 16' 1 J P •iR _ I ._I `p DENIAL MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1005-14 t' CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FOR A SECOND CURB CUT AT 7800 GROVELAND ROAD; PLANNING CASE VR2014-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, Frands Jensen, property owner of 7800 Groveland Road, has applied for a variance to allow a second curb cut on his property; and, WHEREAS, 7800 Groveland Road is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and is legally described as follows: Haluptzok's Terrace, Lot 1, Block 1, Ramsey County, Minnesota PIN 06-30-23-34-0026 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial View 3. Photographic Documentation 4. Staff Report WHEREAS, the purpose of the variance provision in the Zoning Code is to give relief to property owners when the strict enforcement of the zoning code requirements imposes a hardship thereby restricting the improvement of property due to practical difficulties brought about by unique or extraordinary features of the physical property that are beyond the property owner's control; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly -noticed public hearing regarding this request on May 21, 2014; and, WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all must be satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that all of the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code are notsatisfied, and finds there notto be sufficient practical difficulty with regard to the property located at 7800 Groveland Road, and makes the following findings of fact related to its decision: Resolution 1005-14 Page 2 1. Section 1121.09 Subdivision 5e of the Zoning Code states that single-family lots shall be limited to one curb cut per property unless it is in the interest of public safety to waive such. There are no public safety issues with this property that would cause the owner to need two curb cuts. 2. The Comprehensive Plan supports good traffic management for safer vehicle movements on streets. Limiting the number of access points onto a street is one of the ways that the City accomplishes this. 3. Second curb cuts for single-family homes are rare and not desired by the City for traffic safety reasons. 4. There are no unique circumstances for this property. The applicant built the second garage and now wants a second curb cut for easier access to it. 5. There are no other single-family properties in the neighborhood with two curb cuts, and granting the variance would be materially detrimental to the purpose of the Zoning Code or to other property in the R-1, Single -Family Residential zoning district. 6. Adding the second curb cut is the minimum variance possible to alleviate what the applicant has stated is his difficulty. 7. There are no conditions recommended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission, based upon the above findings, denies the variance request of Frands Jensen, to allow a second curb cut at 7800 Groveland Road. Adopted this 4th day of June , 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1005-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OFRAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVAL RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR A SECOND CURB CUT AT 7800 GROVELAND ROAD; PLANNING CASE VR2014-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, Frands Jensen, property owner of 7800 Groveland Road, has applied for a variance to allow a second curb cut on his property; and, WHEREAS, 7800 Groveland Road is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and is legally described as follows: Haluptzok's Terrace, Lot 1, Block 1, Ramsey County, Minnesota PIN 06-30-23-34-0026 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial View 3. Photographic Documentation 4. Staff Report WHEREAS, the purpose of the variance provision in the Zoning Code is to give relief to property owners when the strict enforcement of the zoning code requirements imposes a hardship thereby restricting the improvement of property due to practical difficulties brought about by unique or extraordinary features of the physical property that are beyond the property owner's control; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly -noticed public hearing regarding this request on May 21, 2014; and, WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all must be satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient practical difficulty with regard to the property located at 7800 Groveland Road, and makes the following findings of fact related to its decision: Resolution 1005-14 Page 2 1. Section 1121.09 Subdivision 5e of the Zoning Code states that single-family lots shall be limited to one curb cut per property unless it is in the interest of public safety to waive such. The detached garage is accessed regularly by a vehicle and it would be easier to access with a second curb cut. 2. The Comprehensive Plan supports good traffic management for safer vehicle movements on streets. 3. The applicant built a second garage to store all his vehicles inside. A second curb cut would eliminate any damage to the existing curb. 4. The applicant built the second garage on the south side of the property because there are large, mature trees next to the attached garage that would have been removed to expand the existing garage. 5. A second curb cut should not alter the character of the residential neighborhood. 6. Adding the second curb cut is the minimum variance possible to alleviate what the applicant has stated is his difficulty. 7. Staff recommends that the second curb cut width be limited to a maximum of 20 feet, the width of the garage. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission, based upon the above findings, approves the variance request of Frands Jensen, property owner of 7800 Groveland Road, to allow a second curb cut on the south side of the property, subject to the following: 1. The south driveway must have a hard surface driveway and new curb cut installed within one year of the date of this approval. Adopted this 4th day of June, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) MIUNns VIEW City of Mounds View Staff Report Item No: 5B Meeting Date: June 4 2014 Type of Business: Planninq Case To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Variance Extension Requests for reduced driveway setbacks at 5338-5340 and 5380-5382 Raymond Avenue; Planning Cases VR2011-002 and VR2011-005 Introduction: In June 2011, property owner, Michael Kinyon, was granted variances to permit the new driveways at five of his side-by-side duplexes to have one and three foot setbacks from the north and south property lines. Mr. Kinyon will be adding attached garages to the rest of his duplexes, one on each end of the building, along with new driveways to replace the existing gravel. The lots are all 100 feet wide so only a single car garage will fit, but the owner is installing new driveways that are wide enough for two cars to park next to each other. Many of the tenants have more than one vehicle, and with the current narrow driveways, they either park or drive off the driveway, or they have to move cars around when someone is leaving. Since there is no overnight parking on the streets in Mounds View, all vehicles must be in the driveways. The east side of Raymond Avenue has 14 side-by-side duplexes on identical 100 foot wide lots which causes issues when owners want to add additional space or more than a one car wide driveway to these properties. Mr. Kinyon owns ten of the duplexes on Raymond Avenue and received variances in 1995 and 2008 for reduced driveway setbacks when he added garages to those duplexes on the same block. Discussion: Mr. Kinyon applied for all five property's driveway variances in 2011 because the City was reconstructing Raymond Avenue that year, which included installing new curbs and driveway aprons. Mr. Kinyon knew he would not have all five garages and remodels completed for approximately five years, butwanted to have the wider driveway aprons installed during the street project rather than tearing up the new curbs later to widen the curb cut. The City Code states that a variance approval becomes void if the work is not complete within one year, but the applicant may request an extension from the Planning Commission. Mr. Kinyon was granted 1 -year extensions in 2012 and 2013, and is now asking for the variances on two of the properties to be extended for another year. The Planning Commission was supportive of granting the extensions as long as Mr. Kinyon continues to make progress on installing the driveways. He has fully remodeled two of the buildings (including new driveways) and installed driveways on a third property in 2012. He intends to remodel another one of the duplexes this year and install driveways. That would leave only one of the five properties without the new driveways for 2015. Planning Cases VRI 1-002 and VRI 1-005 June 4, 2014 Staff Report Page 2 Recommendation: Staff requests that the Planning Commission pass Resolutions approving one-year extensions for the reduced driveway setback variances at 5338-5340 and 5380-5382 Raymond Avenue. Respectfully Submitted By cmc.Q-�c t c/__� Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Extension request from applicant 2. Location map 3. Aerial Photo 4. Proposed Site Plans 5. Photographic Documentation 6. Resolutions 1006-14 and 1007-14 Extension Request from Applicant May 15, 2014 Heidi Heller City of Mounds View 2401 County Road 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 KINYON PROPERTIES 2226 Bevans Circle a Red Wing, MN 55066-3401 Phone & Fax: 651-388-8531 Ref. Request for an extension on Variance Resolutions 964 & 967-12 dated June 1, 2012 Dear Heidi, In 20111 applied for five set back variances so I could have double aprons installed at the time Raymond Avenue was rebuilt. In 2012, we rehabbed 5344-5346 Raymond including the installation of two 20' wide concrete driveways. We also installed two 20' wide concrete driveways at 5330-5332 Raymond. In 2013, we rehabbed 5372-74 Raymond Av. with concrete driveways. If I can complete the plans in time, I would like to do the fallowing: • Rehab the building at 5380-5382 Raymond in 2014 including new concrete driveways on both sides • Possibly install driveways on 5338-5340 without rehabbing the building this year or with rehab in 2015. Hopefully I can have some more time on these two variances. In an email May of 2011, a time limit of up to 5 years was mentioned. Whatever time extension the Planning Commission can give me would be appreciated. Sincerely yaws, Michael Knyon, Owner LOCATION MAP The 5 duplexes that received variances in 2011 are highlighted in red �\ y.{M 4rJLb `4 �� ,�t 1011 99tJ II r99 yam \ n 4J i 1m1 � x010 6ptllp)l66 - Iw9 6191 bap ]:� Iw3 x rw aim aal vm - �� 1a1 `�l xa'1 Tln aw s:ro s3sr lwl E 4 mw ua99srtp— � Mounds View 61H �„ 511, Mobile Home Park 616z 1 WIB as Igll Ml] Q I rola w+e 1tm1 pu m:9 s]s•, vv s3s� V9p 1y1 TWA SNS ' 6]M {l ' lma siy mzl — 7RII 511] 6131 4tN '�� 11114 AVN i0P NA' 531' gel➢ �. IOW, roe• wa aur - zao {j} m.e � Ibl]_ 1916 Tj % mfi 2Ula ssle min sN6 wW m6e z»U � m1z Aerial View of the 5 Raymond Avenue duplexes that were granted variances 0 M FQ I ot coca - 6'a� ite Plan for 5338-5340 Raymond I hew ew I Staikrrn}ls QdScIYcL garage arage '— ,Qco) And A,5 N S _ I New New Driveway Driveway site Plan for 5380-5382 Raymond Avenue f7 oil MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1006-14 s CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF A VARIANCE FOR REDUCED DRIVEWAY SETBACKS AT 5338-5340 RAYMOND AVENUE; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. VR2011-002 WHEREAS, Kinyon Properties, represented by Mike Kinyon, applied for a variance to allow for driveways with a one -foot setback from the side property lines of a duplex located at 5338 - 5340 Raymond Avenue; and, WHEREAS, 5338 - 5340 Raymond Avenue is zoned R-2, Single and Two Family Residential, and is legally described as follows: Norseman 1st Addition, Lot 7, Block 1, Ramsey County, Minnesota PIN 08-30-23-14-0007 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved Resolution 939-11, approving the variance on June 1, 2011, and approved a one-year extension on June 6, 2012 and June 5, 2013, and; WHEREAS, the resolution of approval states that if within one year after granting the variance or appeal, the work as permitted by the variance has not been completed, then such variance shall become null and void unless an extension of time has been requested by the applicant and granted by the Planning Commission, and; WHEREAS, the applicant has indicated the new driveways will not be completed within the allowed timeframe and has requested another one-year extension of the variance consistent with the provisions of Resolution 939-11. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission approves a one-year extension to complete the driveways. Adopted this 4th day of June, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1007-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF A VARIANCE FOR REDUCED DRIVEWAY SETBACKS AT 5380 - 5382 RAYMOND AVENUE; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. VR2011-005 WHEREAS, Kinyon Properties, represented by Mike Kinyon, applied for a variance to allow for driveways with a three-foot setback from the side property lines of a duplex located at 5380 - 5382 Raymond Avenue; and, WHEREAS, 5380 - 5382 Raymond Avenue is zoned R-2, Single and Two Family Residential, and is legally described as follows: Norseman 1st Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Ramsey County, Minnesota PIN 08-30-23-11-0024 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved Resolution 942-11, approving the variance on June 1, 2011, and approved a one-year extension on June 6, 2012 and June 5, 2013, and; WHEREAS, the resolution of approval states that if within one year after granting the variance or appeal, the work as permitted by the variance has not been completed, then such variance shall become null and void unless an extension of time has been requested by the applicant and granted by the Planning Commission, and; WHEREAS, the applicant has indicated the new driveways will not be completed within the allowed timeframe and has requested a one-year extension of the variance consistent with the provisions of Resolution 942-11. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission approves a one-year extension to complete the driveways. Adopted this 4th day of June, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) Item No: 5C MOUNDS �(�WW Meeting Date: June 4, 2014 - �- - L Type of Business: Public Hearing City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Consideration of a Variance to Allow a Six -Foot Tall Fence in the Front Yard of 2296 Terrace Drive; Planning Case VR2014-005 Introduction: The applicant, Ron O'Connell, is requesting a variance to install a 6 -foot tall fence in the "second front yard" of his corner lot located at 2296 Terrace Drive. The property is located at the southeast corner of Terrace Drive and Jackson Drive. Since two streets border corner lots, they have two front yards. As such, the City Code requirement for front yard applies to two sides of the property, which means that corner lots to have additional limitations. The Zoning Code indicates that no fence in front of the front line of a building in a residential district may exceed four feet in height. The applicant was issued a permit for a 6 -foot tall privacy fence in his second front yard in 1992 when he also installed a swimming pool. The fence is now damaged and needs to be replaced. The applicant has a swimming pool and his insurance company requires a 6 -foot fence, thus a variance has been requested. Discussion: According to the Municipal Code, Section 1103.08, Subdivision 3, fences of a height greater than 48 inches (4 feet) are not allowed in the front yard of a property without a variance. The Zoning Code also establishes a sight triangle that limits all obstructions within the area at the corner of intersections, measured thirty (30) feet from the point where the property lines meet at the intersection of two streets. The proposed fence would not be located within the sight triangle. Variance Considerations: For the City to approve this variance, as with any variance request, there needs to be demonstrated practical difficulty associated with the property that makes a literal interpretation of the Code overly burdensome or restrictive to a property owner. State statutes require that the governing body (the Planning Commission) review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. The City has set these criteria in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. The Code clearly states that a hardship exists when all of the criteria are met. The individual criteria and a staff comment about each are as follows: a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of these regulations. The property at 2296 Terrace Drive is a corner lot, which is not in itself unique; however, the applicant seeks permission to have a 6 -foot tall fence for the purpose of security for his swimming pool, along with privacy and screening from Jackson Drive. The taller fence would provide privacy and the required security for this property. 2296 Terrace Drive Variance Repod June 4, 2014 Page 2 b. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan supports improvements to properties. The applicant, owning a corner lot, is at a disadvantage to improve the property as other homeowners might because the property has two front yards. Every property owner has the right to apply for a variance to improve the function and livability of their property. C. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Title or the City Code. The applicant cannot control the fact that his property is a corner lot with two front setbacks. The corner lots are much more restricted by the City Code and many times the resident's use and privacy of the property is limited because of these restrictions. The applicant needs the taller fence to meet his insurance requirements for the swimming pool. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size orshape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this Title has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. Granting the variance would not confer upon the property owner a special privilege in tha` most property owners do not have to work with these setback constraints. The City has approved similar variances for taller fences in front yard areas of corner lots that are along busier streets. The applicant's lot is smaller than the current minimum lot size, and has limited backyard space available. e. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The 6 -foot fence has been in place since 1992 so the character of the neighborhood will not change. There is less right-of-way on the east side of Jackson Drive than most streets at 8.5 feet rather than around 15 feet, but the fence does not appear to impact any sight lines, including the view for vehicles going west from Terrace Drive and turning onto Jackson Drive. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The two foot variance is the minimum variance needed since the Zoning Code limits front yard fence heights to four feet. g. The Planning Commission may impose such conditions upon the premises benefited by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established by this Title or to reduce orminimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Staff does not have any suggested conditions. The applicant has already applied for the required zoning permit for the fence replacement. 2296 Terrace Drive Variance Report June 4, 2014 Page 3 Based upon the review of the above criteria, it appears to staff that the requested variance does satisfy the practical difficulty threshold. Public Hearing: As with any requested variance, a public hearing is required. City staff mailed notices to all property owners within 350 feet of 2296 Terrace Drive. Staff has not received any comments as of May 30, 2014. Recommendation: After holding the public hearing and taking testimony from staff, the applicant and any neighbors, the Commission should take one of the following actions: Approve the variance as requested. Resolution 1008-14 is attached for the Commission's approval if they so choose. 2. Deny the requested variance. To move forward with this option, the Commission should direct staff to draft a resolution of denial with findings of fact appropriate to support the denial. Table the request. If the Commission needs more information before making a decision or if more discussion is needed, the Commission can table the request until they are provided such information. Respectfully submitted, Uhf Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Photo 3. Statement from Applicant 4. Photographic Documentation 5. Corner Lot Fence Diagram 6. Resolution 1008-13 ZONING MAP OAKWOOD N N N N N N N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N PARK 5590 N N N N N N N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N " Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential Aerial View Per City Code- only the RED line area can have a fence more than 4 -feet tall without a variance. The YELLOW lines are where the applicant is requesting a variance to re -install a 6 -foot tall privacy fence. Site plan from Applicant ---- A !�F PL 1fl 0f �- I I<-�i v `—>I **Highlighted area indicates where new fence would be located. v • ry ti 3 t V LL � l +r , C 7 F i I • 9' � � ../air t � r.� 1 IL I � x U 3 •f�� S Front of Applicant's awl, 2296 Terrace Drive r - L _ • ry ti 3 t V LL � l +r , C 7 F i I • 9' � � ../air t � r.� 1 IL I City Code Permitted Fence Location for Corner Lots r-------------------------�..... Fence Heights: ----- 8'orless •NOTES: ........................ 4' or less (See 1 — 3 above) Chain Link Garage "Front Line of House ..................................... Front Line of House 6 Only chain link fences 4' tall or less are allowed within 30' of a property corner formed by two street right of ways. Street Frontage 30' IT m t�6 c O L!_ a) N U) 30' MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1008-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR A SIX-FOOT TALL FENCE IN THE WEST FRONT YARD OF 2296 TERRACE DRIVE; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE VR2014-005 WHEREAS, the applicant, Ron O'Connell, has applied for a variance to allow a six-foot tall fence in the west front yard (near Jackson Drive) of his property at 2296 Terrace Drive; and, WHEREAS, 2296 Terrace Drive is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and legally described as follows: Pinewood Terrace No. 3, Lot 16, Block 8, Ramsey County, Minnesota 05-30-23-43-0079 WHEREAS, Section 1103.08 of the Mounds View Zoning Code indicates that the maximum height of a fence in a front yard four feet (4'); and, WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to allow a six foot (6) fence in the front yard abutting Jackson Drive; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents about this proposal: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Photo 3. Photographic Documentation 4. Staff Report WHEREAS, the purpose of the variance provision in the Zoning Code is to give relief to property owners when the strict enforcement of the zoning code requirements imposes a hardship thereby restricting the improvement of property due to practical difficulties brought about by unique or extraordinary features of the physical property that are beyond the property owner's control; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on Wednesday, June 4, 2014, about this variance request; and, WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria that must be satisfied in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. Resolution 1008-14 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings related to this request: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient practical difficulty with regard to the property located at 2296 Terrace Drive, and makes the following findings of fact related to its decision: The general intent of the Zoning Code regarding limited fence heights in front yards is to not close off the front of the property from the visual openness of the street, but yet still allow a fence for safety and some sense of privacy for the property owners. This becomes difficult on corner lots, particularly lots on busy streets, where the property owners really want the privacy due to the high traffic along one of their front yards. 2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the applicant is improving the property. 3. The applicant is requesting this variance because the front yard height limitations would preclude having a fence tall enough to provide pool security, screening and buffering from Jackson Drive. 4. The unique feature of this property is that it is a small corner lot with two front yards, on a busy road. 5. A 6 -foot tall fence in the front yard has existed since 1992 so there will not be any change to the existing neighborhood character or visibility problems for traffic. 6. The 2 -foot variance is the minimum variance required to alleviate the applicant's practical difficulty since the Zoning Code limits front yard fence heights to four feet. The Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the premises as may be necessary to comply with city standards and to minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission, based upon the above findings, does hereby approve the variance request for a six- foot tall fence in the south front yard of 2296 Terrace Drive. Adopted this 4th day of June, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) PLAN PROCEEDINGS OF .1 CITY MOUNDS VIE VIEW NING COMMISSION ESOTA RAMSEY COUNTY, MiNN Regular Meeting May 21, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1, Call to Order for May 21, 2014. The meeting was called to order by V ice Chair Schiltgen at 7:00 P.m. 2, Roll Call Member Commissioners Birken, Carvelli-Yu, Elofson, Love, Rundle, and Schiltgen, Absent and Excused: Commissioner Stevenson. Planning Associate Heidi Heller. Also ent. Page Index to Minutes 1 Approval of Minutes ttion of Variance or an 8 -foot Fence in Second 2 VR2014-002 nsideri Front Yard of a Corner Lot VR2014-003 FConsideration of ront Yard of a Corner Variance for a 6 -foot Fence in Second 2 3 ation of Variance for a Second Curb Cut VR2014-004 Consider 3 Approval of Minutes April 16, 2014. love the MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Randle/Commissioner mCommission meeting as presented. Minutes of the April 16, 2014 regular Planning Motion carried. Nays — 0 Ayes — 6 Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting May 21, 2014 Page 2 14. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the None Agenda 5• Planning Cases A. VR2014-002 Consideration of a Variance for 8 -foot Fence in Second Front Yard of a Corner Lot Applicant: Michael Winkel Address: 7701 Bona Road Planning Associate Heller indicated the applicant install an 8 -foot tall fence in Mike Winkel, is requesting a variance to She explained the roe is the "second front yard" of his corner lot located at 7701 Bona Road. Since two streets border comer lot located have at the utwo fronttheast rnardser f As such,otlre Ca Coun requirement for front yard applies to two sides of the roe ty Road I. additional limitations, property, r tY, which means that comer lots have de The to Code indicates that no fence in front of the front line of a building in a residenfial district may exceed four feet in height. The applicant would prefer to have an 8 -foot tall wood fence for screening from County Road I since his than the sidewalk, and thus has applied for the variance. Staff had no objection to the proposed variance and alk Yard is a little lower recommended the Commission approve the variance. Vice Chair Schiltgen opened the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. chael thanked staff or heel BomRoad, wth this mthe atter. Commission for considering his request and Vice Chair Schiltgen questioned when the fence would be installed. Mr. Winkel anticipated that the fence would be replaced in the next two or three weeks. Vice Chair Schiltgen closed the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Carvelli-Yu/Co 1003-14, a Resolution Recommendin mmissioner Birken. To approve Resolution Lot; Plarnrirr g Approval of a Variance for an 8 -foot Fence in Second Front Yard of a Corner g Case No. VR2014-002. Ayes — 6 Nays — 0 Motion carried. B VR2014-003 Consideration of Variance for a 6 -foot Fence in Yard of a Corner Lot Second Front Applicant: Blaine Fyksen Address: 5045 Eastwood Road Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting May 21, 2014 Page 3 to Planning Associate Heller indicated the applicantBlaine Fyksenl is requesting a variance , install a 6 -foot tall fence in the "second front yard" of his corner lot located at oun Eastwood Road. The property is located at the southwest corner of Eastwood Road and County Road H. Since two streets border corner lots, they have two front yards. As such, the City Code requirement for front yard applies to two sides of the property, which means that corner lots to have additional limitations. The Zoning Code indicates that no fence in front of the front line of a building in a residential district may exceed four feet in height. The applicant would prefer to have a 6 -foot tall wood fence for screening from County Road H, and thus has applied for the variance. Staff had no objection to the proposed variance and recommended the Commission approve the variance. Vice Chair Schiltgen opened the public hearing at 7:08 P.M. Blaine Fyksen, 5045 Eastwood Road, commented he has lived in his home for the past 21/2 years along this busy road. He discussed the improvements he has made to his home noting he was working to improve the curb appeal. Vice Chair Schiltgen closed the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner RuAndro/ al of a Varianceissioner fora 6 -foot Fenceeinthe Seon and 1004-14, a Resolution Recommending pp Front Yard of a Corner Lot; Planning Case No. VR2014-003. Ayes — 6 Nays — 0 Motion carried. C. VR2014-004 Consideration of Variance for a Second Curb Cut Applicant: Frands Jensen Address: 7800 Groveland Road Planning Associate Heller indicated the applicant, Frands Jensen, property owner of 7800 Groveland Road, is requesting a variance to allow a second curb cut and driveway on his property. The City Code allows one curb cut on each R-1, Single Family Residential zoned property without a variance. Staff did not support this action as the review of the practical ded denial of difficulty criteria appear to not warrant approval. For this reason, staff recommen the variance request. Vice Chair Schiltgen opened the public hearing at 7:14 p.m. Commissioner Elofson questioned why the applicant constructed a garage without first receiving approval for a second curb cut. ild a garage without a driveway or curb cut. She Associate Heller stated that they could bu commented that she told the applicant and his contractor at the time the garage permit was Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting May 21, 2014 Page 4 applied for that a second curb cut is not allowed. The Jensen's have requested a o allow the second curb cut. Frands Jensen, 7800 Groveland Road, commented that when he purchased the property, he was instructed by his re y s r street apply for a variance for the second curb cut given the fact Oakwood Drive was not a busy sheet. Judith Jensen, 7800 Groveland Road, explained that Oakwood Drive was a very quiet street with few driveways and little traffic. She did not believe that the second curb cut would have a negative impact on the neighborhood. Vice Chair Schiltgen questioned what was being stored in the garage. Mrs. Jensen indicated they stored an RV trailer and ATV, and it served as a garden shed. Mr•. Jensen explained that the garage attached to the house was quite small. Commissioner Birken asked if access could be made from the original curb cut. Associate Heller commented this was possible, but would create a very long driveway. Vice Chair Schiltgen inquired the expense of a second curb cut. Associate Heller did not have a price, but noted it would be the applicant's responsibility. Commissioner Birken stated this situation arose because the applicant decided to face their garage on Oakwood Drive. Therefore the applicants created this problem and she could not support the variance request. Commissioner Elofson questioned if there were other corner lots in the City with two curb cuts. Associate Heller noted there were a few that have been grandfathered in, but some have been removed when the sheets were reconstructed. She estimated that there were less than 20 corner lots with two curb cuts in the City. She indicated the Public Works Department did not recommend lots be allowed to have two curb cuts. Commissioner Elofson did not see the harm in this property having two curb cuts. Commissioner Love believed that it was a disadvantage to this property owner to not have a second curb cut given the improvements made to this property. She commented that it could be a traffic hazard as well. Commissioner Birken asked why the additional garage space was not added onto the existing garage. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting May 21, 2014 Page 5 Mrs. Jensen reported there were mature trees on that side of the home and she believed there was not enough space. Commissioner Birken reviewed the variance criteria noting the Jensen's did not meet each of the items. Commissioner Elofson recommended the Commission be flexible on this matter and consider the needs of the resident. Vice Chair Schiltgen commented that the Jensen's were made fully aware before they constructed the garage that a second curb cut may not be approved. Vice Chair Schiltgen closed the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. Associate Heller indicated the applicant would have had room to expand their garage onto the existing structure, but the mature trees on the side of their home may be in the way. She commented this could be used as a finding if the Commission was considering approval. Another option available to the Commission would be to table action on the matter to the next Planning meeting. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Birken/Commissioner Rundle. To approve Resolution 1005-14, a Resolution Recommending Denial of a Variance for a Second Curb Cut; Planning Case No. VR2014-004. Ayes — 3 Nays — 3 (Love, Schiltgen, Elofson) Motion tabled. 6. Other Planning Activity None. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. June 4, 2014 B. June 18, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. May 7, 2014 The Commission discussed the May 7, 2014 meeting minutes. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 9. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases May 21, 2014 Page 6 Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. She noted the Planning Commission would be meeting jointly with the City Council on June 2"d. She reported the Abiding Savior Subdivision was beginning and five single-family lots would be created. She indicated Apple Tree Dental should be opening in June. 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports None. 11. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Vice Chair Schiltgen adjourned the meeting at 7:42 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. kk MOIJIVDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA July 2, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2, Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: May 21, 2014 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases A. MA2014-002 & Consideration of a 5 lot Major Subdivision at 8211 Red Oak Drive and a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments Applicant: Kayak Remodeling & Redevelopment Address: 951 Hillwind Road, Fridley 6. Other Planning Activity A. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, July 16, 2014 B. Wednesday, August 6, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. June 4, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion IY � MOU[�ms VIEW City of Mounds View Staff Report Item No: 5A Meeting Date: July 2 2014 Type of Business: Planning Case To Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing - Consideration of a Preliminary Plat for the Subdivision of the East Two Acres of the Abiding Savior Church Property at 8211 Red Oak Drive and a Comprehensive Plan Amendment; Planning Cases MA2014-002 & CP2014-001 Introduction: Terry Buchanan, representing Kayak Remodeling & Redevelopment has submitted an application for a major subdivision of the east two acres of 8211 Red Oak Drive and a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment. The proposed subdivision would create 5 additional lots from the existing one lot and change the land use designation of the two acres from church (CH) to single family detached (SFD). Discussion: Abiding Savior Church owns the property at 8211 Red Oak Drive, which is a 7 -acre parcel with a church building and large parking lot. This property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, but the Comprehensive Plan Existing and Future Land Use Maps designate the property as "church." The proposed subdivision would create five new single family buildable lots which would be consistent with the existing zoning of the property, but not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. All of the lots shown on the preliminary plat meet the minimum lot size requirements: 11,000 square feet and 75 feet wide for interior lots, and 12,500 square feet and 100 feet wide for corner lots. Major Subdivision: Local Water Management Plan: Also known as the City's Surface Water Management Plan, this planning document guides the City in regards to drainage and stormwater management. The project area is located in the AA -5 sub -watershed. The minimum recommended building elevation for the AA -5 sub -watershed is set at 904 feet. The elevations are confirmed by City Staff with each permit for new construction. Easements: The City's Subdivision Code requires that plats dedicate perimeter drainage and utility easements for each lot in the subdivision; ten feet wide in the front and rear, and five feet wide on the sides. This plat does dedicate the necessary perimeter easements. Streets: Two of the new lots will access Ardan Avenue, two lots will access Eastwood Road, and the corner lot could access either street. Both Ardan and Eastwood will be reconstructed in 2014 and are adequate to handle the amount of added traffic that five additional homes would create. Kayak Major Subdivision July 2, 2014 Page, 2 Park Dedication Requirements: The Subdivision Code indicates that any subdivision of land is subject to a park dedication fee. The dedication imposed is intended to mitigate public costs to the parks system associated with land development. The fee shall be reasonable and based on the extent of the development. For major subdivisions, the park dedication fee is typically equal to 10% of the market value of the land. To establish the market value, staff uses Ramsey County assessed values as the basis for dedication computation. 2013 is the most recent year that Ramsey County has available for market values. In this case, Ramsey County has the church's land valued at commercial property prices ($1,803,400), and since the church doesn't pay property taxes, the county's value of their property is not a concern. The 2013 Ramsey County determined land market value for 8211 Red Oak Drive is $5.82 per square foot. The average 2013 land value for the 20 single family properties surrounding the church is $2.11 per square foot. Staff recommends that the land value of $2.11 per square foot is used to determine the park dedication fee instead of the county's much higher value. This amount is more accurate for low density residential land use and it's comparable to the surrounding neighborhood values. The project area is 91,412 square feet x $2.11/sq. foot = $192,879 land value. The dedication amount then would be 10% of the determined land value which would equal $19,288, or $3,857 per lot. In 2007, Abiding Savior purchased the adjacent home at 8184 Eastwood Road, and completed a major subdivision to add the rear 34,940 square feet of the 8184 parcel to the church's lot in anticipation of a senior housing development on the east side of their property. The City required Abiding Savior to pay a $3,984 park dedication fee for the square footage that was added to their parcel. The church did not develop this area of land, but it is now part of the Anna Place subdivision. The City Council could consider giving credit for the $3,984 park dedication fee that has already paid. Utilities: All utilities on the site must be installed underground, per Section 1203.10. Water and sanitary sewer connections will be installed during the 2014 street reconstruction project. Traffic: The amount of daily vehicle trips on the proposed road will increase since five additional housing units are proposed, although there is already a lot of traffic from the site since it is a church. On average, single-family homes generate about 10 vehicle trips per day, thus one could expect an additional 50 movements along Ardan Avenue and Eastwood Road as a result of this subdivision. Vegetation: The 7 acre site is primarily building and asphalt parking lot with only a small amount of green space. The amount of green space will increase with the homes versus the parking lot. Staff recommends that after each house has been constructed, at least one tree shall be planted in the front yard. The new tree species must be approved by the City. Wetlands: The National Wetlands Inventory Map and the City's official Wetland Zoning Map identify no wetlands within the property boundary. The applicant has submitted their application to Rice Creek Watershed District. Kayak Major Subdivision July 2, 2014 i Page 3 i Comprehensive Plan Amendment: The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates the Abiding Savior parcel as "church" and most of the surrounding area as single family detached housing. The proposed subdivision and new housing would not be consistent with the map designations, but is consistent with the residential goals and policies as articulated in the Land Use section of the Comprehensive Plan. A community's Comprehensive Plan is its principal guiding document which is adopted to provide goals and policies dealing with land usage, housing, infrastructure, public facilities, transportation, economic development and intergovernmental coordination. The existing land use map (ELU Map) and future land use map (FLU Map) are two of the many maps, tables and exhibits in the Comp Plan which together help determine and control how a community grows and develops. The Comp Plan is a fluid document, in other words it is not intended to be rigid and static. As the community grows and develops, so too should the Comp Plan. As such, there is an amendment process to make such periodic updates as may be necessary to keep the Comp Plan fresh and relevant based on changing desires and expectations. Mr. Buchanan has applied for such a Comp Plan amendment which requests a redesignation of the two -acre parcel proposed for residential housing from Church (CH) to Single Family Detached (SFD.) The redesignation would seem appropriate as it would be consistent with the surrounding neighborhood designated Single Family Detached (SFD). The Planning Commission needs to review potential adverse effects of proposed or requested amendments. In this case, the property would change from a parking lot to five single family homes which is certainly different, but not necessarily a negative impact. Staff will prepare the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application package that will be submitted to the Metropolitan Council upon approval by the City. Staff believes the proposed Comp Plan amendment is reasonable and supports a recommendation of approval. Recommendation: Review the plans and discuss the proposed preliminary plat and Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments. Staff review revealed no deficiencies at this time and thus Resolution 1010-14 recommending approval of the preliminary plat and Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments has been drafted for your action if the Commission so desires. Respectfully Submitted By, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial View 3. Preliminary Plat 4. Comp Plan Existing Land Use Map 5. Comp Plan Future Land Use Map 6, Resolution 1010-14 8330 slid Zoning Map 01 """ < 8431 19 8424 8425 15 8400 ry 09 6392 8408 N N N l�`I 8395 01 n g 8784m ty 9380 8378 ['8'401 8385 8370 BOB6 37 r 7 8380 8375 n 83869 m 8580 185 8354 8345 151 8346 8335 143 8342 8325 135 8332 8315 133 8322 8305 '25 8300 8285 8290 8281 8275 GROVELAND 6265 PARK 8261 8260 8251 8250 8255 8241 8255 ARDAN nn 1 8453 8464 8454 p Q� 8432 8441 8429 ry m N mN 8408 N N N l�`I 8395 8400 8405 8400 ty 9380 @227 8390 8385 8370 BOB6 8255 r 8379 8380 8455 8420 8415 8406 8405 8400 8379 8380 8373 8372 8367 8368 Yj $359 836419 8345 t.`7:7EM nmol IB315 81 8211 1 83601 18145 1 8310 8455 a1.. 111� 8445 8444 1 8453 8464 8454 0 8433 8432 8441 8429 8444 8425 B420 8415 8408 8415 8424 8395 8400 8405 8400 8395 9380 8381 8390 8385 8370 BOB6 8255 r 8379 8380 8375 8360 N 8355 8350 8375 8376 8345 8340 8371 &572 8335 8330 8357 8340 8325 5320 8323 8320 8300 8315 8318 8305 83100-8321 13291 8290 8285 8290 8281 8280 8273 8265 8280 8260 8271 8270 8261 8260 8251 8250 8255 8241 8250 8242 8066 g 8071 8231 6232 r r N '� BOB 8180 0 09185 W 0 8171 8155 8310 8150 8145 moi@ d, 8140 8741 $ 8111 N N N N PARK BOB N W 8307 8295 n 8310 w ARDANI 8081 /04782 n 8086 8273 n n N8384 PARK 8287 6865 8300 BOB6 8255 r 8280 N N 0 BOB W 8307 8295 n 8310 w ARDANI 8081 r n 8086 8273 n n B09B PARK 8287 6865 8300 BOB6 8255 r 8280 N N 8283 860 N 2 9429 8271 8239 8084 We 8070 3071 8066 8071 8068 8071 8072 8071 6072 8071 8225 8085 8064 8075 806 8059 8050 8217 8060 8055 8050 8205 8060 IM8247 8040 8045 8046 8045 8042 8045 8052 8051 8044 8045 8048 8041 8030 8038 V8145 8040 8039 8032 8033 8040 8035 8032 8031 8038 8035 8020 8025 8028 BOB W to m n n n 6080 8081 r n 8086 8075 n n B09B CO n 6865 H n BOB6 HOBS r N N N N N 8084 We 8070 3071 8066 8071 8068 8071 8072 8071 6072 8071 8060 8085 8064 8075 806 8059 8050 8055 8060 8055 8050 8060 8040 8045 8046 8045 8042 8045 8052 8051 8044 8045 8048 8041 8030 8038 8040 8039 8032 8033 8040 8035 8032 8031 8038 8035 8020 8025 8028 8025 802 8018 8000 8021 6022 8019 8030 8016 8015 8025 ep11 8011 8000 6001 8010 rc 8011 8000 8005 801 8009 8008 798 8005 7985 8004 7981 7990 0 7981 7990 0a 7989. 7996 , 7993 7990 7977 7990 7980 7985 7970-- 970 798 7975 7970 7979 7980 7989 7980 7979 �' :3 m 798 7865 7960 7959 7 7970 7885 7989 7960 7981 7984 7975 �J; 7955 8 7949 7954 7959 7988 7950 7951 7954 795 7934 7933 7956 7940 7945 7848 7927 .7940 HILLVIEW 7955 7950 7930 7935 7930 7917 7945 7932 +' �0 C 7901 PARK 901 n n: .r 7900 dt 7900 7801 m 7900 N N N N 7900 7901 N N N N HLyVI TEIy ROAD * Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential Aerial View Preliminary Plat r" rm O 9 m � n o m m m H H N m N t CL O O o i 0 hom r pu�zmm" m D<+ZOr2 C1�2 �O gA�N OLa A 5;8 't �S mm Z m2 S D r Z a IYYOI: . i I r fl l Ari 2-.-�k--J14 OWNERS: SURVEYOR / LAND PLANNER PRELIMINARY PLAT OF " Kayak Remodliug and Redevelopment, Inc. ACRE LAND SURVEYING, INC. ANNA PLACE j)951 NM,W,nd Road NE 9140 BALTIMORE STREET BE Fridley, MN 55432 SUITE 100 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 8211 Red Oak Drive, Mounds View, MN BLAINE, MN 55449 (763) 45B-2997 ERIC R. VICKARYOUS, PLS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 063023130077 EMAIL: ACRELANDSURVEY(cGMAIL.COM O\LCM ENGINEER: Civil Site Group E #4931 West 35th St., Suite 200 � $ SL Louis Park, MN 55416- �II GRAPIIIC SCALE = a= m: j. IN PRET) ® m e 1 i Eh 30 G. NORTH" a g EXISTING ZONING DATA: 8-1 DEVELOPMENT INFO! M & = dF StIBA KS' FRONT YARD a 00' SIDE YARD (HOUSE) = 10' SIDE YARD (GARAGE) = 5' REAR YARD - 00' – MINIMUM LOT SIZE = If."". Qntaar IOQ, I$500 SO.FT. (.m lot) – MINIMUM LOT MOM – 75' Mtattor/100' cdnx – AVERAGE LOT MOM = 90 FEET NOTES — 2 loot Contour lrb rFal BENCHMARK BASIS FOR ELEVATION: NAVE SS N1.4 REAL IIMF. GPS Cmtradar IO wIfy an sizes and lavation. MEASURE bIEMS ITFILIZING AIMN1iSOTA d .Say �« DEPARTKIENT OP T RANSPORTATION VRYSVORKI yo g RASES PORBEANNOS:ONRAT(SITY(ODNTY COORDINATF.SYSTEM, Ind <IY o 66T3 H V y Q y66F�4�5411 cCCL$ W NOTES — 2 loot Contour lrb rFal – All utllltyz hcw Ex utility plane provided by others Cmtradar IO wIfy an sizes and lavation. – 2 / t Contour Interval H Q J LEGEND d • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND z o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET •o. DENOTES UTILITY PIX£ Q W U �{ DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT Z Q .,.. N DENOTES FRISTNG CONTOUR �_ W � — DENOTES OVERHEAD MIRE J ­ DENOTES WATERMAN W Q (n >— DENOTES SANITARY SEMER (L Z p » DENOTES STORM SEWER Z Z — — DENOTES EXISTING MNGE �xto1.2 Q DENOTES E)WITING OUNATIM. 0 DENOTES CONCRETE �e DENOTES BINMINOus y DENOTES SOIL BORING p q 05/29/14 " EXISTING PROPER'CY DESCRIPTION lwarcT An Lot 1, Block 1, ABIDING SAVIOR ADDITION, Ramsay 14147 County, Minnesota. sY¢r A9 X/X 5/29/2014 311300 PM CDT PRELIMINARY PLAT - OF - ANNA PLACE PROPERTY ADDRESS: 8211 Red Oak Drive, Mounds View, MN PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 063023130077 OWNERS: Kayak Remodling and Redevelopment, Inc. #951 Hill Wind Road NE Fridley, MN 55432 YQR / LAND PLANNER ACRE LAND SURVEYING, INC. 9140 BALTIMORE STREET NE SUITE 100 BLAINE, MN 55449 (763) 458-2997 ERIC R. VICKARYOUS, PLS EMAIL: ACRELANDSURVEY®GMAILCOM ENGINEER - Civil Site Group #4931 West 35th St., Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 ONLand 5YM/2014 34300 GRAPHIC SCALE a PRPP ) 1 mm = an tt °o- �II �- tt�JTf NORTH EXISTING ZONING DATA: 2-1 OEVEI CPMENT INTO Iexlefs, k o --4• SE)BACNS BRONT YARD - 30' SIDE YARD (HOUSE) = 10' SIDE YARD (GARAGE) = 5' REAR YARD 30' MINIMUM LOT SIZE = 11,000 S0.FT. (1nteNar toff, 12,500 SBff.. (caner [at) MINIMUM LOT WOM - 75' bMehtor/100' carni - AVERAGE LOT WOO = RD EEET BENCHMARIC BASIS FOR ELEVATION, NAVD 88IVIA REALTIME GPS MEASUREMENTS MMEING MNINESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VRS NETWORK) BASIS FOR BEARMGS:ON RAMSEY COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM. NOTES - Z fiwf Contour leferTN - NI uOlDs shorn per utility plana pmHded by others. Canwctar fo v fy all chess and locatlona - 2 fast Contour Interval LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET I DENOTES UTOTY FIXE DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT DENOTES UISTNG CONTOUR —^�•-- DENOTES OVERHEAD HIRE �— DENOTES WATERMMN —�— DENOTES SANITARY SEVER —» DENOTES STORM SEINER — •— DENOTES EMSTNG FENCE xRm.2DENOTES EXISTNG EIEVATON. 0 DENOTES CONCRETE 59 -� DENOIES BITUMINOUS fp DENOTES SOL BORING EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 1, ABIDING SAVOR ADDITION, Ramsey Count, Minnesota. gET� bio gbo� S�gg'dc n n*�aaa € e $ s0 f— Q J d } Z EL W Z Q � � W J a- > L1 Q co Z 0 W Z Z Q0 MW 6 F&PA¢1ml'I 05/29/14 14147 SYFEr Ns XIX MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1010-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ANNA PLACE, SUBDIVIDING 8211 RED OAK DRIVE INTO 5 LOTS AND A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FROM CHURCH (CH) TO SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (SFD); MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. MA2014-002 WHEREAS, Terry Buchanan, representing Kayak Remodeling & Redevelopment, has requested approval of a preliminary plat for the major subdivision of 8211 Red Oak Drive and a Comprehensive Plan amendment; and, WHEREAS, the above-described land is zoned R-1, Single -Family Residential, and legally - described as: Lot 1, Block 1, Abiding Savior Addition PIN 06-30-23-13-0077 WHEREAS, Terry Buchanan, representing Kayak Remodeling & Redevelopment has submitted a Preliminary Plat for the major subdivision which creates 5 buildable lots; and, WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision is not within a designated wetland area; and, WHEREAS, the community development and public works staff have reviewed the preliminary plat and finds that it satisfies the minimum subdivision requirements as articulated in Titles 1100 and 1200 of the Mounds View Municipal Code and complies with county platting requirements; and, WHEREAS, the applicant has requested approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment to redesignate the 2 -acre parcel from Church (CH) to Single -Family Detached (SFD) in the Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 1204.04, Subd. 4, the subdivision is subject to a park dedication fee to be determined by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Staff Report 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Zoning Map 4. Aerial View 5. Comprehensive Plan Existing and Future Land Use Maps Resolution 1010-14 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing for the subdivision and Comprehensive Plan amendment on July 2, 2014; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat for Anna Place and Comprehensive Plan amendments submitted by Terry Buchanan, Kayak Remodeling & Redevelopment, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Comprehensive Plan amendment will only be effective upon completion of the subdivision. 2. The applicant shall pay a park dedication fee in an amount to be determined by the City Council. 3. The applicant shall obtain permits, if required, from Rice Creek Watershed District, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and the City of Mounds View before construction activity commences. 4. All utilities within the development area and to the individual home sites shall be located underground. 5. The applicant shall enter into various agreements with the City including (but not limited to) a Developers Agreement. 6. The applicant shall apply for Final Plat approval no later than 6 months after the date of approval of the preliminary plat, or the Preliminary Plat approval will become null and void. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 2nd day of July, 2014. Acting Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) MOUNDS VIEW of Mounds View Staff R Item No: 6A Meeting Date: July 2, 2014 Type of Business: Other Planning Activity To: Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion The corridor continues to be the City Council's priority and the Planning Commission has been reviewing the Zoning Code in order to better promote and accommodate development along County Road 10. The Commission has been discussing creating a Corridor Overlay District in order to give more flexibility to new development projects on the corridor. The City is willing to be flexible on requirements such as setbacks, parking, density and height, but the City also wants projects that are high quality. An updated draft of the overlay district language is attached and a resolution is available for action if the Commission is ready to move forward with this new overlay district. Staff has made four changes since the discussion at the Council Worksession meeting. A new chapter 1128 in the City Code was created for this overlay district instead of inserting the new language into an existing chapter, so the numbering is now completely different. The section about the City having the option to not require a development area to comply with the overlay district was removed because in 1128.05 the zoning districts that would be applicable are listed. I added zoning districts R-3 and R-4 to the listed zoning districts. There is also a new addition of 1128.04, OTHER REQUIREMENTS, which specifies that any deviation from the overlay district chapter must comply with Chapter 1125.02 of the City Code, which is about variances. Recommendation Review the updated draft of the proposed language for the district. Resolution 1009-14 is available for action by the Commission if so desired. Sincerely, Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Attachment: 1. Resolution 1009-14 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1009-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CODE TITLE 1100 CREATING A COUNTY ROAD 10 CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT; SPECIAL PLANNING CASE 187-13 WHEREAS, one of the City's primary focus areas is County Road 10 which is the main commercial corridor; and, WHEREAS, the City desires high quality projects and wants to help attract more development to the City; and, WHEREAS, City Staff has recommended that definitions and regulations for an County Road 10 corridor overlay district be added to the City Code; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission agrees with the City Staff recommendation to add a County Road 10 corridor overlay district; and, WHEREAS, City staff has ameded Chapter 1128 of the Mounds View Zoning Code by deleting the smart language and adding the underlined text as follows: CHAPTER 1128 COUNTY ROAD 10 CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT SECTION: 1128.01 Purpose 1128.02 Permitted Uses 1128.03 District Area Defined 1128.04 Other Requirements 1128.05 Standards 1128.06 Existing Uses and Structures Resolution 1009-14 Page 2 1128.01 PURPOSE: The purpose of this District is to provide standards of development for land lying on either side of the major transportation corridor along County Road 10. The County Road 10 Corridor District is the primary gateway through the City. The aesthetic impacts from new developments and redevelopments must be evaluated to help ensure the long-term viability and success of the District. Accomplishing the purpose of the County Road 10 Corridor District requires particular concern for the site layout, building materials, site features and other related design elements. To that end, new development and redevelopment shall conform to the standards in this and related zoning requirements. In reviewing and approving land use applications, the City Council will make the final determination in the compatibility and consistency with all provisions in this and related sections of the Zoning Ordinance. 1128.02.1 PERMITTED USES: The overlay district provisions apply to any base zoning district set forth in this Title that exists within the defined overlay area. 1128.03 DISTRICT AREA DEFINED: The following area is hereby established as being within the County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District: All parcels having frontage on CountV Road 10. All parcels that are within 200 feet of the County Road 10 right-of-way. 1128.04 OTHER REQUIREMENTS: Any deviation from the requirements in this chapter shall comply with the procedures and criteria provided in Chapter 1125.02 of the City Code. 1128.05 STANDARDS: For development of properties within the County Road 10 overlay district, the following standards will be applied where these standards supersede requirements set forth in the B-1 (Neighborhood Business) B-2 (Limited Business), B-3 (Highway Business) B-4 (Regional Business) PUD (Planned Unit Development), R-3 (Medium Density Residential) and R-4 (High Density Residential) zoning districts. All other standards and requirements of the above-mentioned zoning districts shall continue to apply. Subd. 1. Construction Materials: a. At least fiftV (50) percent of all exterior wall finishes on any building will be comprised of a combination of at least two of the following materials: Resolution 1009-14 Page 3 (1) Brick (2) Natural stone or cultured stone (3) Glass (4) Masonry stucco (5) Other comparable or superior material as approved by the City 31 panels metal or wood. All building materials subject to approval of the City. c. Buildings may be constructed of primarily one of the materials listed in Subd. 1 a, if the design exceeds the intent of the ordinance and is approved by the City. d. Non -decorative exposed concrete block buildings are prohibited, as are pre- engineered metal buildings, corrugated metal -sided buildings and wood sided buildings unless such metal buildings and wood sided buildings are enhanced on all elevations by the application of brick, decorative masonry, or decorative stucco surfaces in combination with decorative fascia overhangs and trim. Subd. 2 Architectural Design: Each building design will be reviewed for at least the following considerations: a. Appropriate location of structures on the site considering the relationship to other site amenities, restrictions, adjacent land usage, etc. b. General layout, roof treatments, proportion and quality of exterior. c. In the design of buildings or clusters of buildings, developers must orient protects so that the side(s) facing County Road 10 form the front of the project. Where front toward County Road 10 is not feasible due to the location of access roads and other site constraints, the project must be oriented and designed in such a manner so as to convey a pleasing appearance from County Road 10. d. Screening of mechanical equipment, tanks, loading docks, refuse handling, ancillary equipment, etc., whether on the roof or on the site. e. Drainage pipes on exterior building walls facing a street and/or County Road 10 must be integral to the design and non -apparent. Resolution 1009-14 Page 4 f. Exceptions to the architectural design standards set forth in this section may be granted by the City Administrator or designee, for structures of comparable design and building materials. Subd. 3. Building and Parking Setback Requirements: Buildings and parking lots should have no more than a five (5) foot setback from County Road 10. The required setbacks for the other sides of the property will be determined by the City, based on the specific prosect and land usage. Subd. 4. Off -Street Parking: The City will use the off-street parking requirements in Chapter 1121.13 as a guideline, and base the final determination of required spaces on the specific project and land usage. Subd. 5. Landscaping: a. Landscaping requirements shall be in accordance with Chapter 1127, Tree Preservation and Landscaping. b. A minimum of fifteen (15) percent of the total area of each lot shall be devoted to landscaped open space. c. All open areas of any lot not used for parking, driveways, or storage shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, berms and planted ground cover. Subd. 6. Signs: In accordance with Chapter 1010. Subd. 7. Outdoor Storage and Dumpster Screening: a. No outdoor storage shall be permitted unless such storage is visually screened from view from County Road 10 and all adjoining residential properties, with suitable solid fence constructed of masonry or wood at least six (6) feet in height. Screening shall be well maintained. b. No dumpsters may be located on the sides of buildings fronting County Road 10, except if in the opinion of the City no other suitable location is reasonably available for such purpose and provided the dumpster area is developed in a manner so as to minimize it's appearance from County Road 10. c. All dumpsters shall be entirely screened by a masonry or solid wooden fence, with pate, or a comparable screening, at least six (6) feet in height. Resolution 1009-14 Page 5 1128.06 EXISTING USES AND STRUCTURES: Uses and structures in this District that were conforming prior to the effective date of this Ordinance will remain conforming upon adoption of this Ordinance. Subd. 1. All subsequent additions, exterior alteration and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building after the date of adoption of this ordinance, shall: a. Be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction, and, b. Be designed in a manner conforming to the original structure's architectural design and appearance, and, c. Meet all other standards set forth in this ordinance. WHEREAS, amending the City Code to add definitions and regulations for cargo containers would better serve the public and would clarify the zoning requirements; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission concurs that an amendment to the City Code is warranted and justified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of amendments to Chapters 1102, 1103 and 1106 of the Mounds View City Code to add regulations as defined herein. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 18th day of June, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chairperson ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) 'p PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting June 4, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for June 4, 2014. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Birken, Carvelli-Yu, Elofson, Love, Rundle, Schiltgen, and Stevenson. Absent and Excused: None. Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller. Index to Minutes Page Approval of Minutes 1 VR2014-004 Consideration of Variance for a Second Curb Cut - Revote 2 VR2011-002 Consideration of Variance Extension for Reduced 3 Driveway Setbacks VR2014-005 Consideration of Variance for a 6 foot Fence in Second 4 Front Yard of a Corner Lot 3. Approval of Minutes July 24, 2014. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Carvelli-Yu/Commissioner Elofson. To approve the Minutes of the May 7, 2014 regular Planning Commission meeting as presented. Ayes — 7 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission June 4, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 2 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. 5. Planning Cases A. VR2014-004 Consideration of Variance for a Second Curb Cut - Revote Applicant: Frands Jensen Address: 7800 Groveland Road Planning Associate Heller indicated the applicant, Frands Jensen, property owner of 7800 Groveland Road, is requesting a variance to allow a second curb cut and driveway on his property. The City Code allows one curb cut on each R-1, Single Family Residential zoned property without a variance. Associate Heller explained this case was discussed at the May 21, 2014 Planning Commission meeting and a vote was taken to act on a resolution which denied the variance. There were six Commissioners in attendance and the vote was 3-3, so the motion to deny the variance did not pass. The case was tabled until the June 4, 2014 meeting for another vote. For any variance to be approved there must be a majority 2/3 vote (at least 5 of 7 votes are needed to approve a variance). Staff did not recommend approval of the case as the City does not agree with adding second curb cuts to residential lots. Chair Stevenson indicated he reviewed the information from staff and the minutes from the previous meeting noting he was prepared to take a vote. He reported that if the Commission does not approve the second curb cut, the applicant can appeal this decision to the City Council. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Birken. To approve Resolution 1005-14, a Resolution Recommending Denial of a Variance for a Second Curb Cut; Planning Case No. VR2014-004. Commissioner Love commented she has given this request some consideration and after reviewing the variance criteria, she believed the variance was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as the resident preserved three mature trees through the placement of their new garage. In addition, the City had an urban design goal to improve the appearance of the community. She believed that the applicant's second garage improved the curb appeal of the neighborhood. It was her opinion that the current code was behind the times. Commissioner Love further discussed the actions of the applicant noting that Mr. Jensen was made aware that a second curb cut was not allowed. However, she proposed that the Commission consider that trees had been saved and therefore, the variance should be allowed. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting June 4, 2014 Page 3 Chair Stevenson reviewed the variance criteria as well noting he did not believe the application met the criteria listed. Commissioner Schiltgen noted this was a corner lot and did not believe it was unreasonable for the applicant to request a second curb cut. However, he understood that the request did not meet each of the variance criteria. Judith Jensen, 7800 Groveland Road, stated if she had been told she would not receive a second curb cut she would not have placed the garage where she had. She recalled being told that in order to receive a second curb cut, she had to go through the variance process. Frands Jensen, 7800 Groveland Road, commented he would not have purchased the property if he had known the variance would not be approved. He stated he built the garage where he had space and did not have to lose mature trees. Commissioner Birken believed this was an unfortunate case of putting the cart before the horse. She stated the applicants were clearly informed that a second curb cut was not allowed and noted residents have created their own hardship. She recommended the Commission vote on this request. Ayes — 6 Nays — 1 (Love) Motion carried. B. VR2011-002 & VR2011-005 Consideration of Variance Extension for Reduced Driveway Setbacks Applicant: Mike Kinyon, property owner Address: 5338-5340 Raymond Avenue & 5380-5382 Raymond Avenue Planning Associate Heller stated in June 2011, property owner, Michael Kinyon, was granted variances to permit the new driveways at five of his side-by-side duplexes to have one and three foot setbacks from the north and south property lines. Mr. Kinyon will be adding attached garages to the rest of his duplexes, one on each end of the building, along with new driveways to replace the existing gravel. The lots are all 100 feet wide so only a single car garage will fit, but the owner is installing new driveways that are wide enough for two cars to park next to each other. Many of the tenants have more than one vehicle, and with the current narrow driveways, they either park or drive off the driveway, or they have to move cars around when someone is leaving. Since there is no overnight parking on the streets in Mounds View, all vehicles must be in the driveways. Associate Heller indicated the east side of Raymond Avenue has 14 side-by-side duplexes on identical 100 foot wide lots which causes issues when owners want to add additional space or more than a one car wide driveway to these properties. Mr. Kinyon owns ten of the duplexes on Raymond Avenue and received variances in 1995 and 2008 for reduced driveway setbacks when he added garages to those duplexes on the same block. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting June 4, 2014 Page 4 MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Schiltgen. To approve Resolution 1006-14, Resolutions Recommending Approval of a Variance Extension for Reduced Driveway Setbacks; Planning Case No. VR2011-002. Ayes — 7 Nays — 0 Motion carried. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Schiltgen. To approve Resolution 1007-14, Resolutions Recommending Approval of a Variance Extension for Reduced Driveway Setbacks; Planning Case No. VR2011-005. Ayes — 7 Nays — 0 Motion carried. C. VR2014-005 Consideration of Variance for 6 foot Fence in Second Front Yard of a Corner Lot Applicant: Ron O'Connell Address: 2296 Terrace Drive Planning Associate Heller indicated the applicant, Ron O'Connell, is requesting a variance to install a 6 -foot tall fence in the "second front yard" of his corner lot located at 2296 Terrace Drive. The property is located at the southeast corner of Terrace Drive and Jackson Drive. Since two streets border corner lots, they have two front yards. As such, the City Code requirement for front yard applies to two sides of the property, which means that corner lots have additional limitations. The Zoning Code indicates that no fence in fiont of the front line of a building in a residential district may exceed four feet in height. The applicant was issued a permit for a 6 -foot tall privacy fence in his second front yard in 1992 when he also installed a swimming pool. The fence is now damaged and needs to be replaced. The applicant has a swimming pool and his insurance company requires a 6 -foot fence, thus a variance has been requested. Chair Stevenson opened the public hearing at 7:32 p.m. James Norton, 5550 St. Stephen, requested further information on the request from Mr. O'Connell. Associate Heller explained that Mr. O'Connell was requesting to replace the 6 -foot fence that was already in place. Ron O'Connell, 2296 Terrace Drive, commented his existing fence was damaged by the plow this past winter and he was simply requesting to replace this existing fence in the same location. He indicated he would be installing a maintenance free vinyl fence. Chair Stevenson closed the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting June 4, 2014 Page 5 MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Carvelli-Yu/Commissioner Rundle. To approve Resolution 1008-14, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Variance for a 6 foot Fence in Second Front Yard of a Corner Lot; Planning Case No. VR2014-005 Ayes — 7 Nays — 0 6. Other Planning Activity None. 7. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. June 18, 2014 B. July 2, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. May 21, 2014 The Commission discussed the May 21, 2014 meeting minutes. 9. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases Motion carried. Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. She explained the Abiding Savior subdivision would be reviewed by the Planning Commission on June 18`h. It was noted the overlay district language would also be discussed. She provided comment on the recent joint worksession meeting held with the City Council. She commented Apple Tree Dental would be open for business on Friday. 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports None, 11. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 7:54 p.m. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. June 4, 2014 Page 6 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA July 16, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: June 4, 2014 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases A. DE2014-001 Development Review for a new commercial building on County Road 10, west of Woodale Drive Applicant: Build to Suit, Inc., representing Biol-ife Plasma Services Address: 1805 State Street, Bettendorf, IA 6. Other Planning Activity A. None 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, August 6, 2014 B. Wednesday, August 20, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. July 2, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion Item No: 5A MO_ A — S i Tr� Meeting Date: July 16, 2014 UNll �/ Typ e of Business: Planning Case City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Development Review of a new building for BioLife Plasma Services, on north side of County Road 10, west of Woodale; Planning Case DE2014-001 Introduction: BioLife Plasma Services has been located in Mounds View for several years and is currently leasing space at 2222 Woodale Drive, in the Mounds View Business Park. They now want their own building and have a purchase agreement to buy the vacant land on the east side of the Mounds View Motors car dealership on County Road 10. Multi -Tech is the owner of the vacant land. Build to Suit, Inc. is the developer for this site and is requesting a development review for a new 16,692 square foot building to be built on the south side of the site, fronting County Road 10. They will be creating two lots from the land they are purchasing and will l sell the north lot in the future. A major subdivision application will be submitted in the coming / weeks. A new building will allow the company to continue its success in Mounds View and the north metro. Discussion: The land to be developed is 3.68 acres and zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development. It should be noted that the property is zoned PUD, but this is not a planned unit development project. It does not qualify as a PUD because the land area is less than the required five acres for a commercial PUD, but it will remain zoned PUD. The additional 2.78 acres will be left vacant and sold in the future. BioLife is a plasma collection facility and the building will essentially be a medical clinic. They have numerous locations around the United States and currently have five locations in Minnesota. BioLife has been in Mounds View since 2004 and currently has about 40 full-time employees and 72 customer donation beds. Buildinq Design & Materials This new construction will be a single story commercial building. The exterior will be brick and limestone on all four sides with glass and aluminum architectural accents on the roof. The main entrance will face County Road 10 Parking According to the City's parking code requirements, a medical clinic this size would be required to provide a minimum of 150 spaces and the site plan shows 169 spaces. BioLife is aware of their higher parking needs and is ensuring that there are enough spaces for their employees and customers. Development (review for Bio Life July 16, 2014 Page 2 Access & Fire Prevention The site plan shows a right in/right out -only access on County Road 10 which will need approval from Ramsey County. There is also a driveway leading through Multi-Tech's parking lot and out to Woodale Drive, along with a driveway leading north to County Road H2. There will be easements on the plat for the shared driveways. The parking lot and driveway surround the building and there are three access drives to the site which will satisfy fire department access requirements. Setbacks Building setback requirements for this property are as follows: front: 30 feet, side: 10 feet, rear: 20 feet, front parking area: 30 feet, side and rear parking area/driveway: 5 feet. The site plan shows that all required setbacks would be met. Gradinq and Drainage The applicant's engineer has submitted an application to Rice Creek Watershed District for this new construction. The City's Public Works department and engineer consultant, Stantec, are also reviewing the grading and drainage plans. When the property to the east of this site, Multi -Tech, was developed In 1988, a storm water pond was built and was designed large enough for full build -out on both Multi-Tech's property and the subject vacant land. The stormwater from this development will go into this pond. At this time, the engineers are waiting for comments from Rice Creek Watershed District. There are no wetlands on this land. Utilities: All utilities on the site would need to be installed underground, per Section 1203.10. Water and sanitary sewer lines are already present on the north and east sides of the site. The utilities to the building would be installed and paid for by the developer. Landscaping The vacant land is currently somewhat wooded, but it appears to be mostly trees with little value except for one tree in front along County Road 10 that the plan indicates will be saved. A landscaping plan was submitted and staff will review for compliance with Chapter 1127, Tree & Landscaping Requirements. Signage According to Chapter 1008 of the City Code, this development is permitted to have up to 200 square feet of ground signage and 100 square feet of wall signage. Staff will review all signage permits to ensure consistency with the City Code relating to signage. Snow Storage There are areas on the site in which snow may be plowed and piled in the winter. If the plowed snow reduces parking on the site or detracts from the general appearance of the site, the property owner will be responsible for off-site snow removal. Development Review for BioLife July '16, 2014 Page 3 Development Review Summary: The proposed commercial use on these parcels would be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, and would bring new development and tax base to the site. The three roads (County Road 10, Woodale Drive and County Road H2) that will provide access to this site can accommodate the additional traffic. The City will need to execute a development agreement with the applicant to ensure all of the specific requirements and conditions of development are satisfied and adhered to. Recommendation: Review the staff report and consider attached Resolution 1011-14, which recommends approval of the plans submitted by Build to Suit, Inc. for a new 16,692 square foot building for a BioLife Plasma Services facility. Submitted By, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial View 3. Narrative from Applicant 4. Site Plan 5. Building Elevation drawings 6. Concept drawing of new BioLife buildings 7. Planning Commission Resolution 1011-14 Zoning Map Aerial View Narrative from Applicant Biolife Plasma Services ""PT "SWAG June Narrative June 23.2014 PROJECT NARRATIVE Biolife Plasma Services Build to Suit proposes to secure a land purchase from for development of a proposed Biolife Plasma Donation facility. The land is currently being platted and consists of approximately 6.7 acres and located north of County Highway 10, south of County Road H2, west of Woodale Drive. After beginning of construction the property will be platted again to sub -divide the north and south have. Biolife proposes to develop on the south have and potentially sell the north half for future development. The south half that will pertain to the proposed biolife project is approximately 3.6 acres in size. The proposed Biolife Plasma Services building is approximately 16,692 square feet. The business operation is generally described as follows: at will customers frequent the facility to donate plasma. The plasma donation process typically takes about an hour to hour and a half. Donators are financially compensated for their donation and are only allowed to donate 2 times per week. The plasma is utilized in various products, primarily medical products that help save lives. Biolife Plasma Services requires parking typically in excess of City Ordinance. Below is the justification, Biolife has approximately 40 full time employees and 72 customer donation beds. This totals the need for 112 parking stalls, however, as employee's shifts change there is a need for additional parking, slightly less than 40 stalls, this leaves a small remainder of stalls for customers that are waiting to donate when all the beds are full. This required parking analysis is based on a long standing business operation model that has been continuously reviewed to minimize required parking needed to maintain a successful business operation. This project site is located within the area that was previously developed as the JLN Development. There is a regional storm water management detention basin that was previously designed to accommodate the development of this site. The previously approved drainage report and calculations are included in the new drainage report submitted with this submittal. The overall project is anticipated to start construction during the summer/fall of 2014 and be operational mid -year 2015, however, the actual project schedule is dependent on the approval from Rice Creek Watershed District and the City of Mounds View. 11pagc cow a� ; i� :mqF - g Multi -Tech p4r ing lot & building u m I � 5 - i u I Existing x. _ OZ stormwafer pond J Building Elevation I6 ©_' J, "l 76 �- �I Os i ggs' a a i filer, IiI�III � 7 3i I6 J, "l 76 �- 3 s S.S. � ?¢ � 7 6 gzo �e I s5 13'n a@figge - g 114 @yq @@@@@@3 q �d 61.6E � 5 ge 13 HP M 141,14 }; U �gBpim Concept drawi of Biol-ife Plasma Services buildings UTILITY AND EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUM13ER5 cm or rnwnose�2. r.AN1165orA PUO -C "KS OEPARMENi ielepM1one Number POURE DMARMENT (763)-77-070 EMMSEN6Y 911 FIRE OEPSO NT (763)-766-4436 EMERGENCY 911 WAIER DEPANIMENT (76])-717-4050 SERER MAINXNANE'E OMARWENT (763)-717-4050 MINNESOTA ONE CALL (STONES) (BIO) -252-1186 xca ENERGY yAoa)-695-4999 DRAWINGS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS FOR BIOLIFE PLASMA SERVICES IN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) NOTE THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED IN THESE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOUNDS VIEW STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. ""IO EPerson OREM W. MOAN ielepM1one Number (]19) ]62-9546 Fox --L!.. (319) 362-7696 WE, A.1— 1860 BOYS011 REM E-Ymil ME.... br<n10M1olleng.com Dole Sub Nll.tl 08/23/2014 IN. Oc(c 8ubmittatl 07/OJ/2014 2nE Oa(a SubmilteE HALL & HALLENGINEERS,, INC. k N , o,ai>sFara ulws,xr uminlm. wr`"ro �� SHEET INDEX NO. C1.0 C2.0 C3.0 C4.0 C5.0 ".0 C7.0 C5.0 C9.0 LI .O L2.0 ZONING INFORMATION B-1 YARD SETBACK REOU/REMENTS MWT YAR9: mRET • ..YA40: 10 fEEf • WAR . 20 fFEI TOTAL EXISTING AREA • 160.344 SONAR, Em- afi6 IS TOTAL EXISTING OPEN SPACE • 160,30 SQUARE FEET- 3.65 AMES LEGAL DESCRIPTION . MO LA41023." EXISTING ZONING d' USE 7WINR PUO/WMHFRO,LL PROPOSED ZON/NC k USE 2WINc PUD use ..E.E WHIG DE5CRIPOON COVER 51TE EXISTING CONDITIONS 51TE DEMOUHON PLAN SITE LAYOUT PLAN 517E UTILITY PLAN 51TE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN SITE PAVING PLAN 517E CON5TRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS 51TE CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN 51TE LANDSCAPE PLAN TOTAL PROPOSED AREA • 160,30 SWARF FEET= ME, AIV. ES TOTAL PROPOSED COVERED AREA • SWARF IEEI 96,951- 223 ANNEE (BODE CE TT/1 MEA) TOTAL PROPOSED OPEN SPACE . SWAT REL 83,393= 1.46 AC.ffS (40AF OF TDTOL APER) REWIRED PARK/NG 16,692 S WOO I/IM OF W& 167 SPACES REWIRED T.I& PI .. SPACES 1O.E.: 169 SPACES MIN. AOA WE. 6 POA PRONOM.. 6 P1Su173 No TO AAs No. PO 60K 5462 AM IST AVE. SUITE 201A E. PJ CMAHO WA 52241 BE J19-512-2122 fAL J19-512-5110 CIVIL ENGINEER: HAI. AND NNL ENMEW5 NC Am. Al1EN MR RE INN BORON NO. IAAWAIN IOWA 5= PHdIG (J19}352-9518 FAX (31OHNO 7595 ARCHITECT: OPN ARMIRMS ATI DOJO AS E BEEBERY. ASSOCATE NALLEM AP 200 SON AAE SE MIT 201 MAR RMIOS, IOWA 52401 PHSNE:GI9)-.353-6016 SURVEYOR: ISOMS k AEStTBFS. INC ATM: MM VANMA P.E 72W HEELOM IINE -SLUE TO MANE MEW. MN 55]fi0 MOVE: (76J)-424-5505 CITY FILE NUMBER HAIL AND HALL PROJECT NUMBER: 20798 Ai...amemw�emu<I....aO<sw<otuwam am...n<.m.m<..un. m,n<x. fir. clnaa 49ivola TOTAL PROPOSED AREA • 160,30 SWARF FEET= ME, AIV. ES TOTAL PROPOSED COVERED AREA • SWARF IEEI 96,951- 223 ANNEE (BODE CE TT/1 MEA) TOTAL PROPOSED OPEN SPACE . SWAT REL 83,393= 1.46 AC.ffS (40AF OF TDTOL APER) REWIRED PARK/NG 16,692 S WOO I/IM OF W& 167 SPACES REWIRED T.I& PI .. SPACES 1O.E.: 169 SPACES MIN. AOA WE. 6 POA PRONOM.. 6 P1Su173 No TO AAs No. PO 60K 5462 AM IST AVE. SUITE 201A E. PJ CMAHO WA 52241 BE J19-512-2122 fAL J19-512-5110 CIVIL ENGINEER: HAI. AND NNL ENMEW5 NC Am. Al1EN MR RE INN BORON NO. IAAWAIN IOWA 5= PHdIG (J19}352-9518 FAX (31OHNO 7595 ARCHITECT: OPN ARMIRMS ATI DOJO AS E BEEBERY. ASSOCATE NALLEM AP 200 SON AAE SE MIT 201 MAR RMIOS, IOWA 52401 PHSNE:GI9)-.353-6016 SURVEYOR: ISOMS k AEStTBFS. INC ATM: MM VANMA P.E 72W HEELOM IINE -SLUE TO MANE MEW. MN 55]fi0 MOVE: (76J)-424-5505 CITY FILE NUMBER HAIL AND HALL PROJECT NUMBER: 20798 09IOZVN l WONd VIOS3NNIN 'A1N000 AMMMa iw,w 3Lv0 O3 OW" NOLLdINOS30 N0503N 'ox "X X009 M3N n 'MIK SONNON 30 ALIO 3HL NI I .w. °rn'-°�� >Ioz/to/m gra 073 SNOIIIONOO DNIISIX3 311S S331AN3S tlNSVId 3JII 019 rMe ue 03noaddv 133HS ........— (7T+ nuv e mw�u. LJ uu i � n� � _`_ _�♦ I I �f��J_I l I.1- " " "1 I �� IL__ - ,�� __ ___ _ I ° .µ _ ___ __ ___ _ _ s_ ♦ - _ ____ • v_ _ .o.Sp3 __ ------ __ __ _______ _ __ __ ______ — � , _ ------------ _ ♦aa'____ �„w `'_.� _� I ------------------------- ------- ------- '`°v' ♦ao' 7 .a^ "`' _ �,,, Yci-w--T_-[¢sy3t`` 1- " 4J ```` u!P' ♦ - ��pa:__ " � -i y��y da, ^� so"_�• `dam ycEf,.'.� J ------------- u � , Oe tw _i°`', .✓" _ ,f� Mme; f 4 ^6 % vu.ru .0 l 00 i ,j r _ _ ea Ny \ �n / ervwns ff " 'K R , CP1ppIC BCAp p PBI 'm --- s ov� � __ -____- s ; u'll \I F)IaYE kSsnxc smEWARE90S__ Ills A /'p1 / _ —� l / .a 44.1 O __ I�IIII�"Ir'�I�II ,� ��i.a l �� � � — ARK - ,moi"��• — _ ---- '/ �F vF O �'• _ -- �; II�,J�II�I�III'I / ---_ z.___ ---_--_- P _ ___ , \ .,\ ------- ='—I �___ __ _ ____ _ __ h xet,ove m� Tmlcni '--____- N —__. _ --- Elf A • r r// //�. .: �`�`�i�tt \` -------------__________ r __ ____ ------------- ' r i — _ __ -___ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ ""� _ ------------ _ _ K" `°'�' = I w I I I I I 1 1 I I I I Ll-� "1"1 1 11 r -H' I � I t-�,1 IA a � W. e Ll 11 Ll REUDW E "NG PAVEMQIT MD CURB MD W7EA IN NIS AREA ❑ ,— ____________ __ - - _______ _ UlL____ __ __ ________ ___ __ ___ _ _______ ____ __ _ _____ ij` _ _ _ - _ _ _ ___________________— k � �P _______ _____ ______ ___ ______ ______ ______ _________________— ______ _____ _____ ----_- E e iT ❑ o t oaaWN Rr. ons / /_ HALL 8 HALL ENGINEERS, INC. - anl. gc�mwwEuExxlnE= BIO LIFE PLASMA SERVICES IN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA SITE DEMOLITION PLAN SHEET C3.0 ` E nPPROVEO 0Y: BWJ / / onTE: 07/03/2014 / /mel"b-,�>�> NEM BOOK: W N0. REMSIDN DESCRIPTON APPROVED OATS PROJECT N0:20180 r o9lnz ON 133roda a9xxw,an3oam.�vl 3lva a3AoaaaV AVUNDS3a NOIS1A3a 'ON xxx 9003 LLl3lf tl10S3NNIW 'A1Nf10� A3SWtla vwwaavam•.�.zm`+vw a 'MS3 SONHOW SO ALIO 301 NI vunn'ro / / PAaz/fAd/a3Ao day _ U» Ntlld 1f1OAtll 311S s301Aa35 tlwstlTd 31n ole �,,,���ro� 133xs 'ONI'SagWON3TTVH 8TtlH / / rS AS NMVd jSNOLLVA3➢ ✓" • OxLL51X3 H91VW IY I 35tlBB(5 atllllNtllYd .8I d .9 An a \_ 0 xim ❑ ______ _ _ _ ______ _ ____ -----------------_ 41 _C_ 9-- ------------ _ Y % 1 v 51bLLVAv" / 1 9NLLSU(3 Nb1VW z$ _ ❑ ❑ 35V9ax5 aVInNVN9 I` V6 k 6vx 4t � ❑ Vii x�o e S SSLxtl mW/6 ' ``• M o—• m �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11HillI�°:. 9 c a a`• � 3atwsonw mroANols al ''� /1-: ' s n i'r<a9 p v � 'ma I '3Ld ® , •, r v asarxs,9z y v3 ununsl t . � / l In xa .99 —► " a a`". " 'Da -'" I F m S.✓' ya nwa ssnNn xn lJldll a3ll(q ON^ o `^ . � n 3sveens 'ry. ro �Vxs3lxl a , `` lmnNVdo.9 (Q tl Ie 8 m m m 5 i s ra Q vr$,, iF tl3tltl ON10 l 9[Y2T3H ONtl N1VM3U6 a 4✓') v M.6INlBgLYNd 1tltl931N1 � 1�9wcaa�av wo-meLOT (du) a91s odn> awa�aaan -0 .OL 9tlN GA i K �r� k eana arra mmA3a6 r.el i OxtlFl XNM3UI5 %Mtltl35M3tl1i NWd3lNl .9 -0 9g Q 1 YO, Vd ayGa m m z v a' x. � Vl lr Id •Q, 1srT tla� •1; � r,{{,, g xoanvw a .my ^' ea �-► s Tms a e \/ V ,J•;{ Lb e 519 El El ELI H I ^6 `6 tlG 9G aaVA3xISpl _ l98d XI dfVE �IddYYa srwmie— I � I C R -I � I T1 i I —y ♦ t SLINib (VBl) CURfikGPAIE) 1 �IIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIII IIII VIII I ®.d r L /LL i N -elvuwrs— S � ff yyyppp... n, BIO LIFE PLASMA SERVICES IN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, RAMESY COUNTY, MINNESOTA sw<wre rp61. m,�Nann swnna oea3. La�mn So PIM=W)R50 818]6&8860 FEGI Si.P.11NV OVi=066.OW F 'N>ii18169 BB", �. d211SS 2.1 N 2 P11NV . E.3 ST.P.3s BE,, Nl�SBIRBOI FESS CIE., INVIN=896.060 E'2IUNRIE.59 PIM-%2AI4 PEER BlP.B INV OUi=401.Bt0 3113668.0313 AOWI.OSB1 1 P 96 sw<wre rp61. m,�Nann swnna oea3. La�mn So PIM=W)R50 818]6&8860 FEGI Si.P.11NV OVi=066.OW F 'N>ii18169 BB", �. d211SS 2.1 N 2 P11NV . E.3 ST.P.3s FESS CIE., INVIN=896.060 E'2IUNRIE.59 sw<wre rp61. m,�Nann swnna oea3. La�mn PIM=W)R50 818]6&8860 FEGI Si.P.11NV OVi=066.OW F 'N>ii18169 FEs 1.1 P11NV T.21BERL) 19NW--9.WE.6Po PRIFI=690.159 ST.P.3s FESS CIE., INVIN=896.060 E'2IUNRIE.59 PIM-%2AI4 PEER BlP.B INV OUi=401.Bt0 3113668.0313 AOWI.OSB1 1 P 96 GL 32'N W1� T P,1 1 d CRT=90158 E5T1Ls680 1BB66 i.6 Ell -901.021 sTPz STINT., FUR... NAE SLP. INVIN=099.]36 yfiN29N< i.P.S MNOUT=099.8]8 E511600.<B]0 PIA1=HI1.011 ST.IM,2I0RL13%3GPATE 61.111 INVIN=PJ3930 . 1,212SO16288 SIIS Cui .1. 581 3289 51 Ng00]9]131 6T0rt,i CUEfUGPALE IN 6916V 5f6 PZ=FIeI=9B9.1ss Bi.P.I 1200FEWER :Niscua9ac reI4x4mz) .6 1M'IN=396.368 3 01V IN m 396.5&1 61196 W6 3TiPI NV qfi=s9A .11 8(3301 P.MM2IUFL) S1JHT.S E.Rl) 6UP06GPA1E 6I18 INVIN 899A 3 1 g99 6i Pb INVOU! 8990]0 Ti Ud pu Nan BES F.0 11-1 T.21BERL) ST.P.3s BEENPIPE i.6 sTPz BW cUF6n-- PE RPE <1. Fo, M-W 096.56 Bi.P.I 1200FEWER I FE611 P.MM2IUFL) Si MNIsi,Pd.l IZW.N TE 9015PEPIPE WOP2 1.1.03 12.W6i A111s U,.11 IPE Wvn ..C.i 2:.0) 91]0 0.50% 6 m IaNFE.GR TE PEPIPE EF A8 6V:1M.5 Si:Nu,n) TP O9% C 66GPATE 2UFB&GIt4TE MBpE PIPE B99.01 S?IN?1 .11,11, ERRSRE, CUP06GRATE UF66GBATE HDPE 1111 099.34 9T 65 SL.IM.6 (G6L) .P. ..11 C 90163 101E PIPE PREEBURE PIPE CABLE FETRUG SIR SITE UTILITY PLAN a n n w CMPEC SCNL IN Ill WAIL Y -m SHEET > i FETRUG SIR SITE UTILITY PLAN a n n w CMPEC SCNL IN Ill WAIL Y -m SHEET > i SITE UTILITY PLAN a n n w CMPEC SCNL IN Ill WAIL Y -m SHEET > i D'93 1 NV ld l0MIN00 N0IS0NR (INV ONIOVLI0 31IS 133HS tl10S3NNIV/ 'AiN0oo A3SNtl21 'MMA S0No0N 30 ALIO 3HI NI S3O1A93S VNStlld 3311 019 NO aMivm e0' 'a Wunnw pxnJAa3N/xWveenp "c 3'JVLOIs ltlJlw3xJ/IVIrt31tln .n.SLVH z (� u ONINWd lMaJnxISNO'J N :039 IIVHdW1 3tlV A0 . stl N. 3K IYOIdAI NOLLO3lONd 3NV1NI dddNS 3Hl AO IONINOJ 1M60a3 ONtl OHIOYIp 3Hl OL 03aaY 39 TtlMS SIOiLLIMO ONNlOT1O3 31LL '.N3W31d., 3aV A3K SV Nnd lO . W50a3 3d013 WNHMMNO1 ONOIV (aJ05 NIJ NO) 3JN33110 3HI O1 Y3H1 WO INNS Ni1YNVW dd S 3H1'WHIWN3130-3Nd 30 MNNVO SWLLVOOI 10NLN03 31 NO (INHEM 'ION.LNOo NOISoaa SNOMVWI IUNIHOO W/DNV S3amNO0 SN aLVW. 30 AVNs HYId IONINCO WIsoH3rv. "13N 3NY SIMM81 X13a 353X1 1VHL 33S Ol (u010VUNOJ IV.. W H3WO) 33lllne3d I. 3O no 3. 36 TM 11 'dd. 3X1 01 30Vw S30WM 3X1 AS 03103i 1 3HV N. SNSIOI.W0/SW1VW W 3. 30 IV 01 MONd 3e TM dddMS 3X1 3o sW5H3A a VOdn s30UOV8d IOMNO3 NUMM LN3aan0 MONS OL OLVadn ATYJIWIWd 3e ISHW ddMS 3HI 51x130 511 MW avnINV3 39 ON aNV addxs 3HL 30 AdW V 03nddn5 3e MVHS LISW ONgWM SaOLOVMNW/sa01VH3d0 IIV -Am V. W3 L 'ON 11WWd IVMH31 S3odN 3HI NO 533LLtXWd-00 3MO30 TM aNY a30NOHd 1N3WLtl15 wavouLLH30 3Nl 351503 31153 ONINaON SaOlOVN1N /SWIVLO TY 'NOHVO`N..S IVN3 30 31tla 3HI M NO3e S3uNLL0tl WLLOn01S3J aVa 3X1 MOHI S JOI Ttl IV MM WLLOn015W3 3X1 W 1d3N 3e TVHS (dd.) NVII WLLNSMSd NDUNTN)d H MUMS 3W `30�aN 33vo5 M ION /"\ SIIVS3a NOLI.oaLoad NSItlbNI lvoia .L NAOnitl 0Ntl 3JNVWd I. xnnl 3ltllnatl3 OL x313nHNI N axWuv .01 M xln v '.NJK ..'NO atle X.... V SV M. 30"M I..1NTryAO03 Wry 3511 M lOT3 AVN W1JYW WO 31LL Y 3Ha sMuinanl W WNV1Y13A gtvm�dwMW Jaw x3313SYx V36N ONINSWIN03 3HI O H O Wu0llaad 131x) OV m '[ laM M SHI W sHOM S M a31VIn N I 34 1X311135 3M HIM s3rswnla "Nx1I1W SH M "O"TO 13'JV3a WUOLO. 13M..I0. ON.. 30T NO ool-SINIMO3S "L 'W1d33 g NGO tl ONM3 SHOW W Mtlx 30 s3NJNl 5'0 53JOWadA O 1WA3 WLLYll.V AH113 HiIN SxIMN 4Z MNIM OW Al%I3µ a33ab5Nl XnMMX V ltl 30 TIV16 33103 3NVLi1 '1 'ffiax 3Na5 J1 lax z (lVM3 O3A0addtl W) �p�Z�Lai a y(]oH9tlA) �.I�aoNo� ,S-Yi1N[S$ 3N. ON. =N) Had z)WNris 31LLVN IVL3W W Q•IS pxlNn pum (Iw.rdu) 3rve MVals JMxn Duma 3roe MVUM--� �� 351; IOSNNOO WISOH3 aNV'ONNVd 'ONlaVW 33S 31tl05 M lON <D 8ONVE.LN3 N0laDnaisNOo a9z ;u t 1 'sNW W 1M-WVM ..S 31 U35Y3NJN130 AVW 3JNVMN3 30 H1O. YLWWW H lOV.NW A NI O31fO3dS wW '(IVLLWMS3a A1WV3 30NIS NW 133 .0 3WINIW 1003 OS �HLON3l 3JIftla1N3 pi O u 0 ❑ ❑ LSI u O U 0 RM E a .o.n 1N3A3ad Ol 03Nna3S 311 INHS 311510 031nvH SIVIN31Vw 11V 'OI NJLLOnaLSNOJ SNO1JtlWNOJ NO p35tlp 3l5 3Atl31 Ol 31e1ROd 3N AVW N05(la3 3113 NN SV3WN Iltl 1N31tlAIM3 !p 3JN3311S3auLLav5 3alAOxd 'St 5 UI!3dOxd ONINIaHONN ON— xWN ANY ..N. OW MON 1O310Nd IWM VOOVNINOJ'§I SHWH iZ 30 OOx13d V NIH11M 3115 NOW O3N U 1pS l0 SMIN0/5133.S W111INV .I. Ol WIJVNNOO TL 'NNOM 1... 3. O1M OALtl dHCON1 36 AVW 3150X3 ONn10H11MJ WJ SWSNONd H N1O'"OHS SW130 3X1 W WLLMOV NI ZI '133 and 30 Wu31dNOD IVNt3 Ol S3OVIS WLLOnMSHOJ WHIM WONI NOHMNOJ IVWLLONN MVINd NddV NI 03NIV1NNW 3O SgUNIV33 353X1 1VN1 030N31NI SI 11 "1 Md 3X1 WOW NOWN3 IM IN 03SNV0 301HOIW HOW NOLLn d WIJ 3X1 IONLNW OW 3EIWINIW AI31LLJ3ii3 Ol SV a3NNVW V MIS NI IaWONd SIHL W NNON NononatsW0 03eMd 3X1 ONIHSndWOOOY HW 31OnWd011 30 INRs UMOV81NW 31LL '11 3O3tlaa 3X1 W WHV"N 30 lON1NW 3X1 W3 O HM3a 3N AYW HIM WUOn SNOJ 30 S WAW SNJ s3HHISg0 N3H3H MONS Slro13a 1. '01 '03z..s x330 SVH 315 31LL luxn a3xrvlS 13e IryN0 sNOps W5oN3 'a3131dw00 N33e SVHM No SU OS IS 3X13]3 s3IHS A Hod! 1tl O3Sn 3a WM 1N3roAM3 W SNOOS 101LL3J W50W 'S3Ntl1Nl TY ONIpNtl 1x31VA X03 W SNOOS ISOdWOJ 3JN311115 ANVWdWL TVISNl TIVHS W10YalWO '6 'N010VMW3 3Hl .i0 unIN5NOdSM 3HI OSIV S13JN A ITS 3M AO 1N N JY1d3tl W/UMI 3ONVN3LNMW 'HMJtlta30 3M AN ANV55303N Stl O311Y1SN1 3011Vf6 33HU 1115 W WLLIaGV 'NVId 3M NI NO No OHS SV IM13U Wd UTTVISNI 30 TroNT'035n Al USH331115 V i t Or- 3aM SHOW NO SAVa 130 ama3d V VoJ O INOJ 3e 1.1. JNIm35 lwxtlwa3d HO 3JNIHNOO lON IJM SKUVMd0 383HN S13W a30NILLSla NI ONIO335 ANVa0dN31 301�'I ONISONVI a3SOd Ud 3H1 Md 0X10005 NO ONI. 3alAONd N3M NVId 3dV3SQNV133H dH1 aid 3115 O aHMISa 34L NMO lgSd pV3H'.. 3L31dWOO 3HV SSMUOV NOLLONa1SN Ng. 'S 'Na5S'N"M S.a3WAo UNV SNONVIn'J3a 310VJnld N3d 30 a3SOds1a S3 36 Ol IMd01 S003 INV NOW 3UVlO MMINI3 W3 NVId 3dVO5ONV13H1 NLM 30NVGOO. Ni IIOSd01 31LL UV3HdsIN CW 1103d 3H1 MldNONS CNV dl -S IHS H.VWNOO 3. s 'SIV I. H3N1tl3M A S.... MINIM NO NOHtlOWRON NOdO AI31VIO3WWI O3131dWO3 3N I,V- AaV553O3N .. 53ON3o IOHIWO NOISOW IoS W Sow. '4 I.M. O.N. 3.MW OL .. N0 .Z/1 OL v003 1N3A3 Trv3una M.. ow SAY. W N3A3s Aa3A3 ao1JVUWJ IV.. 3H1 Ae a .N HO 3. IIVHS =. "p1LLN.O ... 'I 'U309M510 ONHO SV3W OL UJ 3OVld NI 39 INHS SOONI314 1031X0 NOISOW HL3WIa3d 'Z 'MINION3 WNDOOMSIHM 3W AN AWSS3M 03W33a W ONV Mlld WLLNM381 NOUSTpd HMVM WNMS 31LL aid 'SNOLLYO13O3dS/SIK330 NNV NVId O310a4dV 3W Wd WNHANIVW OW .31M15NI 30 TVHS 53Nn5V3W IOHINOO I.AIO3s UHV NONO,, TN'1 S3Z0N 1IO2LLN0o NOIsoma Ll o� w �s EA j<0T Nis, ,EasERaoa. 9 =wsl a mss` Ilad`,' "S 4k59 a ,� PFpW gALfp w.az wP'c ,fl �e sl LOi �KtPoAq�IW C RY4ss raJl „.mss„ �-mc`6R Puwasruia�ro � lu� � �,ry s,v„cul wa.-mcu, vvi;ICN r�¢aryan I pili Q Q- r�o r0l Z5 _ ��� --------------------- {° ^, cill— ❑ ❑ a ❑ O '` ED O --------------------------------- ,------------------ �----- - - --- - --- --- - - - --- -- - -- - -- - -- --- -- -- - - ❑ El -------------------- ---- ------------- ----------------- --------------- ----- El ❑ �❑ O El ons / / DR, sYsY: HALL s HALL ENGINEERS, INC. KK�i=si>��.�Fi=A �,,,g,„„ BID LIFE PLASMA SERVICES IN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, RAMSEY COUNTY. MINNESOTA SITE PAVING PLAN SHEET C7.0 _ cuccxeo ews: rveD ev: awa nrreo DaTE: 07/03/2014/ / HEED DOM Wreo. aEwsiory Descawnoe nrrreoveD nnre rrewecT eo:zmeD 0@loz:ory lo3roaa VIOS3NNIW 'A1N000 /JSNtlH a S-IIVl34 ONV 'M31A SoNnow AO kl IO AHI Al i 0'80 S301AH3S VWSVId 3311 019 S310N Noinn ILSN00311S 133X5 3 MS at LON �1 7IVZHa `ONTINlor .LNH34HAtl 1µ10f NO"VNINOa (lueudgba Wwn quwm VIRGINIAlwmAN May W+Ae6) a L oo: °• wn1Wa' 0-(luewdlnbe 6uwo gI'D. paeoN/Ae de A9 peuuy W5) •O. O11tl130 +eyauJ e..e.. O. e tl T wn JI Q. Y +o Maeq e5 e+otleyaD ms �O .•o 00. 1 'Tz•gl o o -.. B 4 Oe.I Tl.l I^J meS,�l y. Ie9yeWlu elea`NI N'l-IA 4T4 w. yewµeleabluq' 31VDS O1 L N �\ µOCEANS Rod I.S@J ...M NW. AWANII.V SaA --- G p a3misxl -. J N1 a3M1-- 3A INN IDA L'INX'W-.9%.9 SDA (Mws N= 8 HHS.L(1) aNV SHao ood ,.9 7VH03ZHI at a[ .4 .I Tv3s o110µ B 9Hao QNV )MA MINI MAN SNIWHD 3µ3s of G0µ �\ MWM vaHOWtl Ni µ0I5 ONDIHtld a3ddtl0IQNVH ° -3ava3ans 1JtlawW 'xm 'nm 'SAVdS SO DWXbtlptlG mNWlf/x 3W 10 3W 1V T18 ONES .Y .S'1 -.SG' XWM3015 30 l3A SAI LI SOON TY1SM S31VES NONA0µ OAN NI 'Z3 bN i' YN. AMS AVM MM .:IS DYd D •01 ON.W3 AM YIVM 313b011J0 -- Stl88nS 10tldW00 3l3tlJWJ . 9 MnD3500a 4 GNaf Ip6WA'i M. xd HJNI Z/1 R 1 - - H _ ]elm We ANN 3DINm13H I 3AVOS 01 ION TONG awva HTa01aN3dH8d �, $'B NVId 3E'S3IXOA -I SAY S9 MEAV,D. 0W M.N. µ3A A. 335 C I YL 51 REMAD. AW M GNAS OMaNVI WIINIXtlN 2 YCfS 513dD5d�Atltl MMptlM 31tl35 M A.. / /.. OHIdIH.LS HotldS `JHINHtld aHddVOIaNVH y (SNo]SN3WM WM3Y WA HEAR 1noAv1 3lIS 33S) (3E]IOW 1Y AN) iN.3H6S3JJY Gm ESA6 lM'EMWl row `-A (a RfiA (MBAR (X11)5 (IMIU-8 O 0 AISW SSAYJV W) ons µM 3aM .9 Q Q "AN IN 'N. AS a0µ137 m OMI 3X1 30 3ALLYlmUn". 5,µ3µm0 3X1 AS. WAOaddtl OWING TVHS USIONA1NO] 381 'HOULDMISNOJ SNIOM SMAROWSM H31YM 3NGNVR Ol SWISNOHd 3WW INNS HOMMINOJ 3Ht "01 31µVµ]5 Al T/IHiAVAN a31VAY]X3 MIEN HAM UNAMO NN 3N IV" S3H]NW. a3M35 RWAS "6 'TOY SJOYARNSWl NI "SN30 AM SM00tld (WORKS NOR 61 OW SUBY MINI (9693 ALAN) ALISN30 ANN HELMAN SWONVIS Y56 Al 341 3O d01 MOW 9H1µ] Z1 Al WIH31Yw AMUNJtl01 MED SNtl Mrd SAM 9 '1AU In03 SM0VdNM MY3H ANON 3H09N 3daL1m 3dN MOW TILWJYN OLJYdWO] 30 3333 Z JJ µ0]H510 W A NIR V AAVIRNl 'sV3atl 03WAMS HI uaN30 AND HI GRANSV1S XS6 Ol aW WMV D3]V3ansnn W (NOW SAW) AMMAN AND NANDI UUVGWAl5 xs9 aL INARO] ANY Slln W KIDA HONG L a 3dld 30 dW MOM MAN W SAXON] Z1 IMMOM NDHYAtl]X3 3N(LLOMAS OW MNNSI 3]Vld'L 91-0 NS -S'S -AZ SW9 L -OC 1IMl S.. OOZ OC 9 4 ;/C I 3Zµ 3A3µ :NOLLVNJVUV ONMATION 3X1 JNGNOW nINI HY]nNVHO MR SAAAMNOM 3D TVHS 53]YAMS ANAYd 7Y3µ3µ S3HJN3W H S "WAS -9 9-D OZ -0 59-01 59 -OZ 01 001-56 001 :ONISSVd Y B ; 9/C Z/1 ;/t I Z/1-1 326 3A31S �AOLLVW W ONMOWAl 3W 133E MVH 3dld AHV NV5 SAY ARMS 8m 31WJ3N'lOtl ONNEUR WInWOR'a W.0 ON O MAl (VHW)NSW UV SININOY HIN3HH MY A3i3i0s WNSILWAIDO •NOW] AO ANDMNY NUO OX 3ALLVlIpu]MIGNNSDA tl�OA REGION53'.MOln93a SAY SINN 318WOFOd 3X1 ALM 3OWSHOON NI ANA] NIWM ANI 3M IOMO d Ol MADAMS 1H]IDARIS NO SONGS A8 ONNO I 3SMmH10 M'G3]tlH0 'a3133H5 '.'OOHS 'mdOTS 38 TtlHS Wd30 NI 133A S WAS N31VMV SntlM 30S WDVAVOX3 MH3aL AN '4 !p 'HAOHOI 'N3dLa ON Ola 'a3atltlWHO µ33B H W011ON HON31LL H3LN SIAM NSA S'NOLLmNNOJ I. HNOW 2Mn Ol A3m3N HIM. µ30M MIS53ad30 ONY SACH 11M ON 'SfpLLOMNED .'a9%13µ 43MO NO VINbf ANN NO ONNV IS MMIµ Y310H TAO 8m MVAV3X3 O1 ANVSSI 383M IAIDX3 'NISSAN 31 OWN 1µ81f AVMA IV Nlmltlw DNIW38 Na 3dld AO MAMR IM*t H031b[WtlM SNtl MINING AMIGA 30VAHd Al MINOR HDN3HL MEMO A-FIVSn ]Y I 'S 033JX3 INN TNNS ..., AGODS. 3H1 'O NNALNK lIZ ...153E ANDINGWOV] AIM MOMMODDY Nm I L53L 55 OAK x9L 30 01 AVM -3 Ul III V MON INAS NOSIVW SIM -µA15 .1 3W SNLSSVd %969Z ORY 3A315.17 3M MISGVA =01 MR WINUM a310NddV HAD NO SOON MMMO 38 TVHS WGIM3tl Al NEMuvN NcMVZnIOY15 MO u Z THNJVB NORMAL AO WRLNdWW WI ARMY TM 1VA MOM NOROVIN 1Stl31 3M 39 INGS OW AIDED M INNS NW '3dld ANY 30 3OVAHnS MISIMA NOM HEIM SANDHI 9L ROM 3MEl HON S3HDNI a SVM MAR 39 ION TVHS 3dld 3141. AO VIA 3M M0130 SAHMMIW314 MOM IpmM '1 9910N 'I'II.DIaVH (INV 'oNIQQRH 'HONRnL L01]vILLNOJ AM AO AHYSEAM Stl ANI 38 Ot M. MARS. -t SHIM II02LLN03 aIALMIJ, IS VTMV O1 ONOWEDY ONnI VI EGOY8 WNmmd 'W9] MAY MM MWONSON NI AVU 3NRV31316VA011V III HIM ONA. SYN' MY 31ANO383d'NJLLDOUN61a b31µ MAN SIMION3 3W A9 MAOVNd SS31Nn SAM 38 O110µ 51 ISI ' MAY M mM1N1N00 WM3W 13Rtl13-) 1590 MAY Ol ONI MODY READIMISM ROSMAN "ROD VAVAV MM 3DNYWRI NI HSOV WMANI MINSd "(NOLLM1tl18N1 NWW GALVM MIN) ... MAS NO GA-5GN IMO ASIA '1590 tlMNY Ol ONMHODOY SWUNSENO WtlmN3d 'SARI 3H(N53Hd a. 8 U'AAHSIYH '03103ANISM 38 Ol UNI MY M0µ31 NI 133A 03 SMO (a UV1 8) .C) NONN35 3ON01 OW ORAN GARY. 'll SHE. 3µM N3IVw 3SMI "SSAxN01M HIM 560"0 "SEARS sNOLLVVIN v WON8ADAGIO NSA3 ASAUDS NOLLYTI6NI GRIST]) MAFAM3AA d A15µ30 MOl W3Nn 38 AMM WINLtlW NOLLYInSNI "HO MNOO H3dd00 ANNµ SAM SNYZ1 I M 1µM9 3G. DAW. INDIAN an N313WVDl NI S 014I C NWW NllYM GABON ONV 31VAIW TY No SORIANO SI 39M ISEI '01 .a.SAN AN DAON V AN AW(HOAMd 38 ANSI SWUL AN 'ORGOVIGNOJ 3M A9 A3M15NI MY USHSIMA3 38 W 3W SNIb3LtlW al MV. AN '9 "H3L3w 3M 10 3aµ NEGR w51a 3M NO O8 SSV,i NO .C) 53µn 3JG91. 3MVI MY SNnw H31VM MVAAN ON ]nand MOA 0l SAN. G. O.OHIMHp3dS MOHJ MAA AN AID 3M MM A Aoo 10nW ONLL531 CRY NOWflWASHl Y I JNN N NOM MAYA "1 'AIMA WdISMN 3M MM NONV31V1 a NASA m1YM AS NOLLO3dSNl AM NO MVNIOHOW'9 OASME Aoadwl AREAS H3LtlM AO NOLLONISNOJ ONINWmb 01 MAN NOWININ SHAM 961N3MWd3A NEWS MOM MAYA IWINOO TtlHS HJ1OVwXOJ'S 'HA OMLSNOD 2. MADS Cl HOW OIVd 3A 7TAY 5333 ON GAIM). 30 TVHS .MMA Ttl'; 3L3HJMJ MM D3I1A I. l3LS O] i/1 Z Na. DR.. SAI V310WN 9-L8 MyD5 a ION %1 TOGFUS 9NIAHVd (lHddtlOIaNtlH INYld No a31VMsAN, W ... aW AD'. M. NI ... 30 al 100w5 Man mLtlAWJ%3 31W11n5 38 AVW 3713Aµ3 H3N3w NI TN3WJVB 0313tldWW '3µI0039 L-A SSVb MM 031Onw5NW 3B IV. 33V.µ3-NUI 5 RIVAS'C 'LL; 3 WISV aW ZICZa RAW MM SWAIRED SN35 DVEW VW,I MM SAM, (ODMS OW'.'µ53W] Z 'SINtlOIOD aNV'SIWOSSOM'LW01%OAW iNiGNINAV5 Ol OLWIn ION In. OWOnpW 'SNT.I ANY DIMMED NOA ONWdAM 3MatlO N DAd AO W t Had ANMR A9 L Wd 01 IN.10µ ON Y.Zl .O ;S6Zl MVAYAANV D TAD .0.1 A SAW ONH33W NLLSYId DAd ZI;Z A RAW MM SNUINW O Icd 94 IN 553N33LL5 ANN SIR YME 0 WISP MM DNAINMD SC -WS .9 3A INN 3did MANGO .ANDS AWNNIAS'I 13 3DW1d3J3tl wNu O1 An. H33NpN3 3M Ol ANGNA. S 39 IIM MNMVNa 3S3M SNOILD3NxO3 IN al SNOISMwm SSMIM SAM 135 ...a M.a. V A.AANN nM MOODY.. 3M'9 'ONAY mmd-Na.) INNEAMllw3 mnoadda a0 (.1) AMA 31 a3lvaNSAS WIMINl-MGOAS s -x '3W 'SH3lsxs 3DVNIVaa S33NI 38 TEENS IVIa3LVH 'I6Z-N ON MZ -W SMLLVNDI53a SIDSW MM 30WQMOV M 3dll alONA 39 -WHY NIGNION MYRNI -9 MAN '".On 0W "On". HIM 3DON"Y" tl a INEBMVd MONO ANSI3SMAN NVI AI SW '34M 3M AO ADS 3M MOW .Zl 3D WASIAK V al MVDNMV, AMM] Va HrNIWN9 MUVNItl40 MM A3PAROM 3. -WHO .3V35 ARMS dad 'ONpma 03 SIAM MM a31OaM5 WS 3a Ttll6 HW30 AMAS ANN t '993 MSV aW S 30 ll ".Z. ANN" AS SLH AMNO 3a 3M ON--aO1H M MWWS .'WHOA AIN8O31N1 MM RAIMM ND 30 INNS (dad) 3dld 3NSO MMIGN ANSMa MIN 'S w MMI 'SALON Tli%OtlH SNtl MN3M 30WMNAAN MI3SVQI WARNED al -ANIONS NjM VHD ANKRV6tl MM a331LMWN 38 TVM 1MHNVd 630µN HOmW SIGNS ARMS `NIH31VH ONIGma Z -H SSV D MM INaf Mm IMMGM 'HANDSVO-Wal 39 INNS ASN3S ARMS ADD Z ASIA OLxSW . 9LO SAW Ol DMASO I ,Zt W dO IMOD AD MAAS 01 (dad) 3AN MSAAMAA.Ve AMAIN X83 NA (WH) 3eld 31AWN03 D3SamNNa In SW ID AN INHS H3 S AMID "1 1-IDASNHat S .A.... SI 3µn DILL MWA S33NEINA INAMO "UAM NWOM DILL a U ANY (.4%.Z MM) MISS aW GIV 3 N. 60tOVMXOS '; "ONIUMNSNIa AN W MAW MMdoad 3M Ao 3Auv1NE36d3a E.G3NG0 3M WARA WAIMMAY MASS INNS HARN81NW 3M 'NWMGMASNM ONIHaa 03b3 MOONS HMSM MOWN Al SNOISNOSd 3XVA-WHS tplOtlwNOJ-HAS 315 3M 'C OWN OadGA0 MM SNOLLV3m ONidld OW SNOLLtlA3 IUMNI AN 3(VNIO6WD 'ANIVD OM AI DONNA NIISVwNOO AL.A SNMINB A8 WGIDAMAD W3 MAND ON ONIa11A0 30 .S µIMM at SNldld Ttl 3X31%3 Ot WROtlMNW Alnun NWASuM Z 'D. SN3M3S MOMS'SSW3S MYNHYS 'SHIVA AAAVM MOENNUa ONGINIONOO al OWN OWNS ANHDIVMD 3M0 Md AO Nouvn3l3 3. MINIM 'I saioN A.LI'ILLn S1µ130 MY SNOLLVSUMJ NS ORM V'S MOM MAVW AJ AID AHL MM 3JNJOWIJJV NI 39 INGO IN.MISNOJ AN sH•LON N011aflalsNoa (9690 GOVI) (NAI OHtlOML15 x06 - NV HV 3dtlOMI "9'CI (9693 WLSv) tlO1J0ad aaraNrlS S. - SBI 3B..µ0] A. sx-KN is a.'µ31%3 MO138 sn (969a WAW) MADO d aNMSAAM x301 - 3atla'JbfS mHSIGNIA 1. L131 C M.. 'SIONAND a M. Y'CI BOSS AGOG !pl]Obd OatlONVIS YS6 - 0 ( ) 3 ON.' VM N1d NM WAIN C NAND µ3d 333 'wmvanva MOLe I'n (8690 WISV) GORDON SMSOSMOSISAY86 - $JMNAO MVM GE ON OtlOI NON 0µV AIM tl00V N3(NI MOLD ZTl (.690 WIStl) aOLJONd OtlY0Ntl15 Y001 - SOtld NWnIO'J a01a31W 'SONLLW3 T. In Aus3 'o WNIA XN O µ013N l'CI S1UT ulsma wnwwM M 3avawoJ'tl -WNN3W9] 153 HN NI S3HJW VI -2 NVNL MI. 3O MINK SdWnl GO ENDED 3141 AS US 1tlHt MON ION OW NOMNN 1SLIMAS NI S3WJNI 9 1. MRGI 40 WDCAJ ON NIVIN0] TVHS 11 53JNVIMM SMISHIS AND SAKE MY N3LLtlw UNWIND AM ANSI MMXIW ADDS SNtl 1. NO 1. 3O INNS S3 WOS 3(IS-330 NONE 03µN100 IVINIVA Tw'ZI AVIb31VN AIH Stl Mn WA 3 WIAEMN MY (d5) ROD maVtl] 11WOd 10 JH.56N0] SIPS 3115 -NO 'll 1pSd01 AO d 01 HO 1NGREI AO d01 01 MY NNOHS S.nMWD HSINH '01 6U-Ol ' ON 1J3rotld ZGM-6b1 OLtlO 'JNI 'S3aN)IJNIp3L ONLL531 1N30N3d30N1 A6 a3HYd3Hd lbOd38 9NIH33NpN3 ltl]INNJ3l03J HIM 3]NtlOaOJJtl NI 3N INNS µNON ONIGVN9 Ttl '6 MU 3O 1N3N3OVId Ol Hand (MISS MW) A15N3a WIDOW OHVODYS 30 x96 011 110333 ANY 5AWNI . AO µ1d30 V Al ANDOWS ONLLSIX3 ANI I S1An WOWIXYN .6 NI lV UMNA LH 3WIN L 'NOLO 9 AEON NI HARI Stl V38V DHAAAM aNV ONNVd ARGON 3µl 101 'a ILANNAND) SI MINNSIO MOM 8311tl 'SVMV AM AN NI 3WHA N5 30 .. dOL ANL JOVARAD3. SW A1. iVMV AND a '9 'INAGROD ANSIOMW a" ANSN30 SEA Ulan III 314 01 AN.uSNn HO IVIS 3atl .1. 3Wtl SIUIS AO SYMY IN40 AN a. MAI 'S SNS 3W AO UNGAR 3µl M S31DN3IS5fpJNl ANY 3AON3tl OL WADIAlg1Y8aN Mtl3N tl AS 955Vd 33aNt HIM 1DtldWOJ 'INS.3111. SM. 73µ1µ]W 1M1 SZ HAM TIOH3WHd TI3 W8NOMLIN HAM RAIOW SMYRNA 80 mlDtldfroJ3tl OW 11131OMOW3tl 3. 1WHS OU AWRA01 IV16MVW 31MAIDSW ANY '3NUMNS INA M SV W m8HnL610 HE 1µS AALLX3al 01 WADY MH IN TOaAOAHd SIN INdM0I '9 AO W d30 V Ol A31HVD5 i, D3 HJlad 4 NO unnmA 3I8Vandd MM 3 WMIIOGN µI MIs -LO 30 a3SOdsw 38 TNHS NAGNSM! 39 M ION 110 A SMOX3 NSma GEN lasa0l s YUNSOMS IMM"Z DNGMC3 d1H15 I N3IdVN] 3l(LLtl15 tl10S3NNIW ONtl 095E H3LdtlH] 31n8 tl109NN1N MM AIdWW TVHS 9HW3DOHd NOLLtl]m ONNOLLYDLILLON :NOLLtlAtlDX3 01 092HDl.1 'Z '3AGV N353tld3tl S,a3NM0 3M MOON 'WADnMSNW DRINK mH3IW OON3 30 XDM A DOHS-ADAAMHd SIM M mLY OAW SI M1 G,NIVD 3 ADDS AN 'I s�,LON 5mlav Io ONOunnO3H MY d10VDaddV Ol MONISMm SM TNHS Sl00NAS :MIDARM 'OMMIUM 3SMMo SS3 M 3aM a3.; IHV MINAS TV .SINGER 1NNERAYd TW NON SLVal 3lIMIGNS II ALL NI E3 VS MUMAREOJ3N OMBIHALWISA K IV 1Nrod INN 5 -TERRA OMMANtl ON'MSC IN AAAA -`WM A.''SWRVONIDOJS WSaNVlS 100 V10S3NXIw OL SNIWHmNOO IRAN OW NS 3NVI OL1.1tl81 AM ASVI AMO M TtlIS SaMMVW 1..Vd Y 1.V KNEW 3b38M .31]Hµ. SAWS3pd 1Fpn 30 30tlA a'S%IaWAS dYOIOXtlH SMObatl AIOIANSITYAN}a ANSI "C 'SN N W NVAM 3µ3µN .ANNY. MUM XWMS3V SNtl ONNIMS ONINatld 1NIVd Z .530µ3a 10MHAO ONAMI WWAGM GO WADI 3M MM 3ORMHO V W 3a TNHS SONINDER ISAMAVd TY 'I SUON ONIAHVY+I .LNRWgAVd 1313 M ONI®0%3 l9µ SItlMONl lY AW 53 Gj 9 0 m RAA 'RM NSIN DNAO 30 X]tl0 SNItlM b3M0 SL33W XItlM 3tl3HN S1NIOf arGWGNIDamn 3DVId 'SNitlM 3aM 114'SU Sam EN AMNNO RAI IMI 133A S OW 'UV M SHO 1333 4 DNA d AS SS WAWpYW VM ; NA 38I ONMINI Maf 38 wSNOD 35N3ASWw }tlAWlb01N30tlfPI 3M AD IMI HOIVN TUNS SIYMNMA ltl SXItlM O0tl 30 553NXJIM SAYM3AI801tl 1d3J%3 'µ]IM 531pµ1 4 3B TYHS 5Xµµ30µ OOd'l MION ,LNXYCJAVd SPIVMMIS NALO%tlW'D 3dA1'1Hp XOLLJVw�OJ IN..... AW SHOWS ICON OORTZI NNM 00d -3I ALW NWNW NVId`�NLLNIM DAVIS OL aOLOVwIpO "ANG .d V 3 W D �Sf!DAVIw 1 ROad M ED µ3N IS IG N! NAS ZI. NW3 OL1OD,V HE I -AS OLLSVIONDS W HDAS 3NVW MI ONI13A31-3➢S V MM mµ30 3. -AVIS SWA VOm 39M IV SINCE SSNMYHD 314 NO mLON S5,7INn 'mNUYM HAAs aW 'SWIS ONLLSIX3 'Sd0015 SSNlallne AA SAEMA 3M DW NOADnwSNOS 1H3NNtld MAN KiW13A 03OVId N TWH rf-A AMRMW HO MYJA ' AS J. X31W- Itl-A IN O NO... ADEM mIGINO d HDM INN 'll NA3pN ION Ane ANSWERS 39 TNN$ S30m 35MMM0 WOOD M31Nn 11GAM11 MAI MM Wtl DMM ]SVD 38 TtlM S9 -A, M" HONDAS SNEUV311n3ds ARGUE w "N"Y" TVAS SWN LNOD aW SNVe 3N lmw3nvd 6 MGV'NGN 8AA. S.AMMA 3M 18 N..MOMntl 6W WILYOLALLON GAIN mMICONS MIYU 3M ltl 1µ3W3] ON D3l�LLIISOnS 3G IVA 514C WIMAS SNAMMUIJ3d5100UN Had NOVA-A'SHO IMI11D3d51O01M M MANDEO TVM I. HO YAM 'a.) IMAµ'. ANIMA 'B MI 30 TNM OMIM AGAR ANd ]3d 17Y Mltl351NSE SAI ION A. IZIE RAI ENOLLtlD13U3dS JOINA Ol A.. 1W S N31tl3a AS ICM I O AARV4 O3d IIAMO Ol WIWWANAD Z SSV10 3G TtlM 3L3tlDNVI 1µ3N33 ONYLLaad AN AlnINSM 'll ON 1 SS ,3 'CIIC ROGIMS ASHUR Al WIYHNW TWM SMMXINGV ONpIN13tl ANIVA aW MMIXINW 1mwNWwN3 aW 'LCIS OW LZIC NENGM. SOGM MM 3JW INGDOW NI 38 TNM SN"SMOIN YS"1 F x2/1-9 3G LtlM 1N31NOD MY 1X373] 1 3d MM 4-3 M C-0 38 IIVM 313Y.]µ7 'ISd . 3G INNS S1N3W3AYd 803 IEA 313HDNOD RON MON3wS 3AH53I AM -9Z HI 'IOCZ NOLL33S WGMaMNS 106UW AS SIRMANEDMI 3M 133E IItlM ]SSI 3f3., '9 '1NGAID SW NSON WAGON 'I ARIL 'Sp W WASVV SNtl .IS NONIE I.ju, 10 ..AANIMM 3M MAW INN AMEND pNVHaOd 5 Swar"Llp3d5 lOpu W MM 3ONAAODDV NI 30 TtlM NOMMI 5µ0O 1MW3ANd AUWNW NSYS NOON 'µIW .9 NO OOd.9 39 TEAS NOH3351MW3AVd 3Dd '4 '35MN3M0 ALAN S531Nn NWH. mMIN1A 3D d01 3W S ... S IONS IV 'C 35MMM0 ONION SSMW DNNVd AN MOM 01 MOZOOWM IW 'Z ON, ...d "DAV 01 ASIAN. 30 11MV INARMYd NI 9MS Ttl 'I SH.LON .LNHNRAVd Gad SNOLLO3NNOD IN OI EGEMA Wla MMAGA MM S9NmVW aRMAK AS 13S V NW1NWw INNS WIDYMN03 3M'6 '1DJOW AM 3O SWu808 Jnbnd 3M AO RMOn MMA ANMna Nou33dSM HI3 TANSµ S NG AOMOM DDI 3M 30 INN MOSO 3 AyA AS AID 3M GAMINESS 31 'AVY-A0-1HDIO 3nOnd µIMM HONDnWSNOI ONINNII Al MGN SNWH ZL-.4 ANWMAtl ONINNMOO MVIGI0addtl 3M AARSN '9 '9911 -ZO2 ,(+WD') IV SytlOM Nm IND 3µa V10S 14 Iw AND 1MM W1Dtl8IMO 'Main NV HDN AO OEMVO AVIAN NO 3DISIMANAla IAll AGING Wel Sul n. n n v ao rvue - w. e ....................... 1......... na. xuo.vave a.0 1u ue-a 11 vaaa cuu:+IlwaNUJ AHL M. DA.M.DIf3 NO SWAN 3M NO ONUMAI Stl SYNIM 3W S3an1%13 A1NLLn Anand 3X3µµ 'L 'NOLLWWSNW DNrona AiuMoxd 1N33Yf0v SMON31D31oad "9 'VIMNNNIW AN MV15 3M NI 3JLLOtlad OL SAI a0A3AtllN ONVI tl A8130 3. TVHS SIMWOXON 'NOLL0nat5NO3 AN ...a tl0 03AOW3a AN3WnNal A1b3dOW AN 3DYId3a'I 'SNA. SNtl 537N ONOLLtl 30WwM AAf n ONWllnb OW INOLLtlOOI aW SIAs mA15 SNONN3wM SNIOa+IN SAI SM -N ANDAI IO M NI33tl 1wM W1'A.I. '4 'NOD3n"MED RNlaM WADII IVU S3JNYNLanddV NOV 5AWASMA5 ONS 01 3Dvwva Axtl S'nAWAINS HIM 3M OI N O3 0 A M I ox M 'lMu3nwS S 3M 01 NAManm 3e INNS; SIMWISnMV TY bm 1mD AM SW O31WdAOO Alnun 3M MM O3LtlNISMpO 3. TItlM 1N3WISNW 3]tl3an5 MAN 3M --A OL "RLI 'LN31 SVR MHASWJ'S3WHWw tMISA Ttl 1SMatl "C SAYA A aaY SO N3N33M DNIOnroX3 ONGVAVOM SWAM ORDER Ob MM 5531ION '9911-ZSZ-AOR-1 $MVD.' ODA IND -MA VI 01 3DLLSN lMAM `s38n-uM 1J3f0µd SIM'Z .ON.. sIM NS IRON ION SAMOMNOD3]A- OW mKAOMAS'SNWW unun RNAGM AMMO 3N AVN 3tl3M 'Alan AGVMX VAV 3W DOI SIM NV SE LLOld SWI ADAGIO aW 53XIDOnwS SNWN llnLLn AO SNOLLtl301 3M 't SNION liMmNo N5 NMRG WOWINIW IIA 9 MM GUANO IXI S30n1 30NONd '5013 VMMY MM AldNOD lNM "'R M`EMMMlOd'4 - - ,1 'Oµ31138 MM 13NStlD 31GMAONAO3l3 IMOMNI MVH MVM ANN '0063 VMAV Cl ONIWSOJI 3dµ anlS lld 3Ad 3N 1WHS NI MiVA 'C (NINA 1-no"SMM IVWl 93d I`ZVR m %O9 d015 GOOD aW dOAS SAM -dOIS NGGVWdNW 9AA MOV 01 MIWNmNOO N3ddOD N 3dA1 O.0 39 AWNS 33µN35 a3LVM A Z MOW 5NOLLtl3WJ3d5 aWOW1S 3AOGG 31dtlW AO ALIS 3M MM 33WONW3tl NI 39 TtlNS WLL30MSIp3 NWw m1tlM IN 'I N`3TOlf$Q6/} 3L3HJMJ MM D3I1A I. l3LS O] i/1 Z Na. DR.. SAI V310WN 9-L8 MyD5 a ION %1 TOGFUS 9NIAHVd (lHddtlOIaNtlH INYld No a31VMsAN, W ... aW AD'. M. NI ... 30 al 100w5 Man mLtlAWJ%3 31W11n5 38 AVW 3713Aµ3 H3N3w NI TN3WJVB 0313tldWW '3µI0039 L-A SSVb MM 031Onw5NW 3B IV. 33V.µ3-NUI 5 RIVAS'C 'LL; 3 WISV aW ZICZa RAW MM SWAIRED SN35 DVEW VW,I MM SAM, (ODMS OW'.'µ53W] Z 'SINtlOIOD aNV'SIWOSSOM'LW01%OAW iNiGNINAV5 Ol OLWIn ION In. OWOnpW 'SNT.I ANY DIMMED NOA ONWdAM 3MatlO N DAd AO W t Had ANMR A9 L Wd 01 IN.10µ ON Y.Zl .O ;S6Zl MVAYAANV D TAD .0.1 A SAW ONH33W NLLSYId DAd ZI;Z A RAW MM SNUINW O Icd 94 IN 553N33LL5 ANN SIR YME 0 WISP MM DNAINMD SC -WS .9 3A INN 3did MANGO .ANDS AWNNIAS'I 13 3DW1d3J3tl wNu O1 An. H33NpN3 3M Ol ANGNA. S 39 IIM MNMVNa 3S3M SNOILD3NxO3 IN al SNOISMwm SSMIM SAM 135 ...a M.a. V A.AANN nM MOODY.. 3M'9 'ONAY mmd-Na.) INNEAMllw3 mnoadda a0 (.1) AMA 31 a3lvaNSAS WIMINl-MGOAS s -x '3W 'SH3lsxs 3DVNIVaa S33NI 38 TEENS IVIa3LVH 'I6Z-N ON MZ -W SMLLVNDI53a SIDSW MM 30WQMOV M 3dll alONA 39 -WHY NIGNION MYRNI -9 MAN '".On 0W "On". HIM 3DON"Y" tl a INEBMVd MONO ANSI3SMAN NVI AI SW '34M 3M AO ADS 3M MOW .Zl 3D WASIAK V al MVDNMV, AMM] Va HrNIWN9 MUVNItl40 MM A3PAROM 3. -WHO .3V35 ARMS dad 'ONpma 03 SIAM MM a31OaM5 WS 3a Ttll6 HW30 AMAS ANN t '993 MSV aW S 30 ll ".Z. ANN" AS SLH AMNO 3a 3M ON--aO1H M MWWS .'WHOA AIN8O31N1 MM RAIMM ND 30 INNS (dad) 3dld 3NSO MMIGN ANSMa MIN 'S w MMI 'SALON Tli%OtlH SNtl MN3M 30WMNAAN MI3SVQI WARNED al -ANIONS NjM VHD ANKRV6tl MM a331LMWN 38 TVM 1MHNVd 630µN HOmW SIGNS ARMS `NIH31VH ONIGma Z -H SSV D MM INaf Mm IMMGM 'HANDSVO-Wal 39 INNS ASN3S ARMS ADD Z ASIA OLxSW . 9LO SAW Ol DMASO I ,Zt W dO IMOD AD MAAS 01 (dad) 3AN MSAAMAA.Ve AMAIN X83 NA (WH) 3eld 31AWN03 D3SamNNa In SW ID AN INHS H3 S AMID "1 1-IDASNHat S .A.... SI 3µn DILL MWA S33NEINA INAMO "UAM NWOM DILL a U ANY (.4%.Z MM) MISS aW GIV 3 N. 60tOVMXOS '; "ONIUMNSNIa AN W MAW MMdoad 3M Ao 3Auv1NE36d3a E.G3NG0 3M WARA WAIMMAY MASS INNS HARN81NW 3M 'NWMGMASNM ONIHaa 03b3 MOONS HMSM MOWN Al SNOISNOSd 3XVA-WHS tplOtlwNOJ-HAS 315 3M 'C OWN OadGA0 MM SNOLLV3m ONidld OW SNOLLtlA3 IUMNI AN 3(VNIO6WD 'ANIVD OM AI DONNA NIISVwNOO AL.A SNMINB A8 WGIDAMAD W3 MAND ON ONIa11A0 30 .S µIMM at SNldld Ttl 3X31%3 Ot WROtlMNW Alnun NWASuM Z 'D. SN3M3S MOMS'SSW3S MYNHYS 'SHIVA AAAVM MOENNUa ONGINIONOO al OWN OWNS ANHDIVMD 3M0 Md AO Nouvn3l3 3. MINIM 'I saioN A.LI'ILLn S1µ130 MY SNOLLVSUMJ NS ORM V'S MOM MAVW AJ AID AHL MM 3JNJOWIJJV NI 39 INGO IN.MISNOJ AN sH•LON N011aflalsNoa (9690 GOVI) (NAI OHtlOML15 x06 - NV HV 3dtlOMI "9'CI (9693 WLSv) tlO1J0ad aaraNrlS S. - SBI 3B..µ0] A. sx-KN is a.'µ31%3 MO138 sn (969a WAW) MADO d aNMSAAM x301 - 3atla'JbfS mHSIGNIA 1. L131 C M.. 'SIONAND a M. Y'CI BOSS AGOG !pl]Obd OatlONVIS YS6 - 0 ( ) 3 ON.' VM N1d NM WAIN C NAND µ3d 333 'wmvanva MOLe I'n (8690 WISV) GORDON SMSOSMOSISAY86 - $JMNAO MVM GE ON OtlOI NON 0µV AIM tl00V N3(NI MOLD ZTl (.690 WIStl) aOLJONd OtlY0Ntl15 Y001 - SOtld NWnIO'J a01a31W 'SONLLW3 T. In Aus3 'o WNIA XN O µ013N l'CI S1UT ulsma wnwwM M 3avawoJ'tl -WNN3W9] 153 HN NI S3HJW VI -2 NVNL MI. 3O MINK SdWnl GO ENDED 3141 AS US 1tlHt MON ION OW NOMNN 1SLIMAS NI S3WJNI 9 1. MRGI 40 WDCAJ ON NIVIN0] TVHS 11 53JNVIMM SMISHIS AND SAKE MY N3LLtlw UNWIND AM ANSI MMXIW ADDS SNtl 1. NO 1. 3O INNS S3 WOS 3(IS-330 NONE 03µN100 IVINIVA Tw'ZI AVIb31VN AIH Stl Mn WA 3 WIAEMN MY (d5) ROD maVtl] 11WOd 10 JH.56N0] SIPS 3115 -NO 'll 1pSd01 AO d 01 HO 1NGREI AO d01 01 MY NNOHS S.nMWD HSINH '01 6U-Ol ' ON 1J3rotld ZGM-6b1 OLtlO 'JNI 'S3aN)IJNIp3L ONLL531 1N30N3d30N1 A6 a3HYd3Hd lbOd38 9NIH33NpN3 ltl]INNJ3l03J HIM 3]NtlOaOJJtl NI 3N INNS µNON ONIGVN9 Ttl '6 MU 3O 1N3N3OVId Ol Hand (MISS MW) A15N3a WIDOW OHVODYS 30 x96 011 110333 ANY 5AWNI . AO µ1d30 V Al ANDOWS ONLLSIX3 ANI I S1An WOWIXYN .6 NI lV UMNA LH 3WIN L 'NOLO 9 AEON NI HARI Stl V38V DHAAAM aNV ONNVd ARGON 3µl 101 'a ILANNAND) SI MINNSIO MOM 8311tl 'SVMV AM AN NI 3WHA N5 30 .. dOL ANL JOVARAD3. SW A1. iVMV AND a '9 'INAGROD ANSIOMW a" ANSN30 SEA Ulan III 314 01 AN.uSNn HO IVIS 3atl .1. 3Wtl SIUIS AO SYMY IN40 AN a. MAI 'S SNS 3W AO UNGAR 3µl M S31DN3IS5fpJNl ANY 3AON3tl OL WADIAlg1Y8aN Mtl3N tl AS 955Vd 33aNt HIM 1DtldWOJ 'INS.3111. SM. 73µ1µ]W 1M1 SZ HAM TIOH3WHd TI3 W8NOMLIN HAM RAIOW SMYRNA 80 mlDtldfroJ3tl OW 11131OMOW3tl 3. 1WHS OU AWRA01 IV16MVW 31MAIDSW ANY '3NUMNS INA M SV W m8HnL610 HE 1µS AALLX3al 01 WADY MH IN TOaAOAHd SIN INdM0I '9 AO W d30 V Ol A31HVD5 i, D3 HJlad 4 NO unnmA 3I8Vandd MM 3 WMIIOGN µI MIs -LO 30 a3SOdsw 38 TNHS NAGNSM! 39 M ION 110 A SMOX3 NSma GEN lasa0l s YUNSOMS IMM"Z DNGMC3 d1H15 I N3IdVN] 3l(LLtl15 tl10S3NNIW ONtl 095E H3LdtlH] 31n8 tl109NN1N MM AIdWW TVHS 9HW3DOHd NOLLtl]m ONNOLLYDLILLON :NOLLtlAtlDX3 01 092HDl.1 'Z '3AGV N353tld3tl S,a3NM0 3M MOON 'WADnMSNW DRINK mH3IW OON3 30 XDM A DOHS-ADAAMHd SIM M mLY OAW SI M1 G,NIVD 3 ADDS AN 'I s�,LON 5mlav Io ONOunnO3H MY d10VDaddV Ol MONISMm SM TNHS Sl00NAS :MIDARM 'OMMIUM 3SMMo SS3 M 3aM a3.; IHV MINAS TV .SINGER 1NNERAYd TW NON SLVal 3lIMIGNS II ALL NI E3 VS MUMAREOJ3N OMBIHALWISA K IV 1Nrod INN 5 -TERRA OMMANtl ON'MSC IN AAAA -`WM A.''SWRVONIDOJS WSaNVlS 100 V10S3NXIw OL SNIWHmNOO IRAN OW NS 3NVI OL1.1tl81 AM ASVI AMO M TtlIS SaMMVW 1..Vd Y 1.V KNEW 3b38M .31]Hµ. SAWS3pd 1Fpn 30 30tlA a'S%IaWAS dYOIOXtlH SMObatl AIOIANSITYAN}a ANSI "C 'SN N W NVAM 3µ3µN .ANNY. MUM XWMS3V SNtl ONNIMS ONINatld 1NIVd Z .530µ3a 10MHAO ONAMI WWAGM GO WADI 3M MM 3ORMHO V W 3a TNHS SONINDER ISAMAVd TY 'I SUON ONIAHVY+I .LNRWgAVd 1313 M ONI®0%3 l9µ SItlMONl lY AW 53 Gj 9 0 m RAA 'RM NSIN DNAO 30 X]tl0 SNItlM b3M0 SL33W XItlM 3tl3HN S1NIOf arGWGNIDamn 3DVId 'SNitlM 3aM 114'SU Sam EN AMNNO RAI IMI 133A S OW 'UV M SHO 1333 4 DNA d AS SS WAWpYW VM ; NA 38I ONMINI Maf 38 wSNOD 35N3ASWw }tlAWlb01N30tlfPI 3M AD IMI HOIVN TUNS SIYMNMA ltl SXItlM O0tl 30 553NXJIM SAYM3AI801tl 1d3J%3 'µ]IM 531pµ1 4 3B TYHS 5Xµµ30µ OOd'l MION ,LNXYCJAVd SPIVMMIS NALO%tlW'D 3dA1'1Hp XOLLJVw�OJ IN..... AW SHOWS ICON OORTZI NNM 00d -3I ALW NWNW NVId`�NLLNIM DAVIS OL aOLOVwIpO "ANG .d V 3 W D �Sf!DAVIw 1 ROad M ED µ3N IS IG N! NAS ZI. NW3 OL1OD,V HE I -AS OLLSVIONDS W HDAS 3NVW MI ONI13A31-3➢S V MM mµ30 3. -AVIS SWA VOm 39M IV SINCE SSNMYHD 314 NO mLON S5,7INn 'mNUYM HAAs aW 'SWIS ONLLSIX3 'Sd0015 SSNlallne AA SAEMA 3M DW NOADnwSNOS 1H3NNtld MAN KiW13A 03OVId N TWH rf-A AMRMW HO MYJA ' AS J. X31W- Itl-A IN O NO... ADEM mIGINO d HDM INN 'll NA3pN ION Ane ANSWERS 39 TNN$ S30m 35MMM0 WOOD M31Nn 11GAM11 MAI MM Wtl DMM ]SVD 38 TtlM S9 -A, M" HONDAS SNEUV311n3ds ARGUE w "N"Y" TVAS SWN LNOD aW SNVe 3N lmw3nvd 6 MGV'NGN 8AA. S.AMMA 3M 18 N..MOMntl 6W WILYOLALLON GAIN mMICONS MIYU 3M ltl 1µ3W3] ON D3l�LLIISOnS 3G IVA 514C WIMAS SNAMMUIJ3d5100UN Had NOVA-A'SHO IMI11D3d51O01M M MANDEO TVM I. HO YAM 'a.) IMAµ'. ANIMA 'B MI 30 TNM OMIM AGAR ANd ]3d 17Y Mltl351NSE SAI ION A. IZIE RAI ENOLLtlD13U3dS JOINA Ol A.. 1W S N31tl3a AS ICM I O AARV4 O3d IIAMO Ol WIWWANAD Z SSV10 3G TtlM 3L3tlDNVI 1µ3N33 ONYLLaad AN AlnINSM 'll ON 1 SS ,3 'CIIC ROGIMS ASHUR Al WIYHNW TWM SMMXINGV ONpIN13tl ANIVA aW MMIXINW 1mwNWwN3 aW 'LCIS OW LZIC NENGM. SOGM MM 3JW INGDOW NI 38 TNM SN"SMOIN YS"1 F x2/1-9 3G LtlM 1N31NOD MY 1X373] 1 3d MM 4-3 M C-0 38 IIVM 313Y.]µ7 'ISd . 3G INNS S1N3W3AYd 803 IEA 313HDNOD RON MON3wS 3AH53I AM -9Z HI 'IOCZ NOLL33S WGMaMNS 106UW AS SIRMANEDMI 3M 133E IItlM ]SSI 3f3., '9 '1NGAID SW NSON WAGON 'I ARIL 'Sp W WASVV SNtl .IS NONIE I.ju, 10 ..AANIMM 3M MAW INN AMEND pNVHaOd 5 Swar"Llp3d5 lOpu W MM 3ONAAODDV NI 30 TtlM NOMMI 5µ0O 1MW3ANd AUWNW NSYS NOON 'µIW .9 NO OOd.9 39 TEAS NOH3351MW3AVd 3Dd '4 '35MN3M0 ALAN S531Nn NWH. mMIN1A 3D d01 3W S ... S IONS IV 'C 35MMM0 ONION SSMW DNNVd AN MOM 01 MOZOOWM IW 'Z ON, ...d "DAV 01 ASIAN. 30 11MV INARMYd NI 9MS Ttl 'I SH.LON .LNHNRAVd Gad SNOLLO3NNOD IN OI EGEMA Wla MMAGA MM S9NmVW aRMAK AS 13S V NW1NWw INNS WIDYMN03 3M'6 '1DJOW AM 3O SWu808 Jnbnd 3M AO RMOn MMA ANMna Nou33dSM HI3 TANSµ S NG AOMOM DDI 3M 30 INN MOSO 3 AyA AS AID 3M GAMINESS 31 'AVY-A0-1HDIO 3nOnd µIMM HONDnWSNOI ONINNII Al MGN SNWH ZL-.4 ANWMAtl ONINNMOO MVIGI0addtl 3M AARSN '9 '9911 -ZO2 ,(+WD') IV SytlOM Nm IND 3µa V10S 14 Iw AND 1MM W1Dtl8IMO 'Main NV HDN AO OEMVO AVIAN NO 3DISIMANAla IAll AGING Wel Sul n. n n v ao rvue - w. e ....................... 1......... na. xuo.vave a.0 1u ue-a 11 vaaa cuu:+IlwaNUJ AHL M. DA.M.DIf3 NO SWAN 3M NO ONUMAI Stl SYNIM 3W S3an1%13 A1NLLn Anand 3X3µµ 'L 'NOLLWWSNW DNrona AiuMoxd 1N33Yf0v SMON31D31oad "9 'VIMNNNIW AN MV15 3M NI 3JLLOtlad OL SAI a0A3AtllN ONVI tl A8130 3. TVHS SIMWOXON 'NOLL0nat5NO3 AN ...a tl0 03AOW3a AN3WnNal A1b3dOW AN 3DYId3a'I 'SNA. SNtl 537N ONOLLtl 30WwM AAf n ONWllnb OW INOLLtlOOI aW SIAs mA15 SNONN3wM SNIOa+IN SAI SM -N ANDAI IO M NI33tl 1wM W1'A.I. '4 'NOD3n"MED RNlaM WADII IVU S3JNYNLanddV NOV 5AWASMA5 ONS 01 3Dvwva Axtl S'nAWAINS HIM 3M OI N O3 0 A M I ox M 'lMu3nwS S 3M 01 NAManm 3e INNS; SIMWISnMV TY bm 1mD AM SW O31WdAOO Alnun 3M MM O3LtlNISMpO 3. TItlM 1N3WISNW 3]tl3an5 MAN 3M --A OL "RLI 'LN31 SVR MHASWJ'S3WHWw tMISA Ttl 1SMatl "C SAYA A aaY SO N3N33M DNIOnroX3 ONGVAVOM SWAM ORDER Ob MM 5531ION '9911-ZSZ-AOR-1 $MVD.' ODA IND -MA VI 01 3DLLSN lMAM `s38n-uM 1J3f0µd SIM'Z .ON.. sIM NS IRON ION SAMOMNOD3]A- OW mKAOMAS'SNWW unun RNAGM AMMO 3N AVN 3tl3M 'Alan AGVMX VAV 3W DOI SIM NV SE LLOld SWI ADAGIO aW 53XIDOnwS SNWN llnLLn AO SNOLLtl301 3M 't SNION liMmNo PGD SMV.o I BSAMPATE➢ NAwl — n PARSING LOT SUBDRAIN NOT TO SOME Ka m =alm. uwn.ly of qP. BTA•—� Ym= L2I.. NAepeeoW tl eD/BUtlof wv.MMe-t Now 44 (eBMe,vn )Fdn D] Q ��I� AAAA -3 Qpo4rtNe gmuly NAflI wh gmmml 9Mdie emwhJ mWeN ml,eWo- Fvsnml Oas I Pe{Aig Not. W BEDDING DETAILS CUSS R_2 13 �f NOT TO scuE UTILITY-EOEIIF =eF-Illq ;n III4RIi1 =FnoO�, -v941PIF $WITAAY SEWCR 0 eou.we 0 ONMRuIN WReR (il.!E) FORCE MAIN W/92E ERIE CI WAS R MAIN -(C) -(0)— CAS _G -0- -(5) -(C) - (S) S1EO -5 -5 (.HE) ----(E)'- ELECDU PD-----E----E — ---(E). (E) E¢CTWC-UNOERgIWNO -UIwWR ---E----- (1) CAHI£ —___C___-C— ----(OHq----(1X1;1 TV OWRNLAOUNo CARIE IV-DMRNEAD -ONG -I(1) - ID,R _-F -KIT ---(F)----(F)— MT-OY£NNEW FIFER OJHW- ERCRWND----P----F- -(DFF) -(GIF)- NDU(OPE-UMOMNEAO -CNF -T -(T) WE-UNDER@iWND -T -T HNCK FENCE UNE SILT MCIF —(FH)-- ROWPWN fIW DWAYOOW UMITS MITS V FW (BOO UTY qtt CONPONE UM115 CgiP - � -8..0440- � _ _ CWTWR ONE r,n UGHT POLE W/O MAST UGIT P0.E W/MAST y IELFPNWE PIXE P.m PCIS -I WY ANCHOR O WY POIE O Of IEIEPNONE PEDESTAL m 0) RUPIAME MANHOIE m ICI CAOIE TV PEDESTAL US 631 UPUTY/CIXITRW CABINET 0 SANITARY ..H. 0 lH STORM MANKOX e Gi IE GRATE INTANE O OR ON ren -O INTAKE __woo RA -5 INTAKE NA -B INTAKE �- - RA-01NTAKE HORSESHOE CATW BASIN W/O FLUME $ pp$�� T-� HMSESNOE CATCH OASN W/FLUME (36 CAS VALVE W O FLARED ETTT SIHHIM Q OO CIFAN.T. STORM W SANITARY DO - WAI'M SGNAL. W/MAST w--v-w NOW; THIS IS A STANDARD IERTID. SOME ITEMS MAY NOT APPEAR W DR NGS. DID LIFE PLASMA SERVICES IN THE CIN OF MOUNDS VIEW, RAMSEY COUNTY. MINNESOTA UTI..ITI LE' --\l ;n III4RIi1 -v941PIF =ki =0 eou.we e - SWEET 9CN CI M411 Q.3 SOL RIXiWO 06 V LIRE HYDRANT v WATER V&W DO Yi WATER SHUTOFF YJ a WATER OLOMfF WRVEY CONTRM MONUMENT AS NOTED SUR/t` LLG IJD 0 A O SITE CONSTRUCTION NOTES, DETAILS, AND LEGEND SET _ OMAN W/CAP NO._ SET PK NAIL FOUND WNVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED FOUND NOW W WAY RAIL S2C . CORNER CET As NOTED SECnON CORNER FWND AS NOT G x W OMN.FTE RECORDED AS "CEMENT uME PI -AT M WRYEY HOUNDARY PUT LOT UNE CENIERUNE WCNCN UNE 1/4 SECTOR UNE 1/s-1/4 SECTOR uNE EmSnx0 LOT UNE DUUMNO SETRACN UNE SHF£T 7 C9.0 4 091OZ:ON 103roxa 31A SSW N AON 0 A3SWtlN 'M31A SONnOW d0 A110 3X1 NI O I NV -Id 3dVOS4NVI 3115 S301AN3S VWSVId 3311 010 133X5 Pal A3N OI N -A N311103X]5-d x3WU3aSAllrylq'ZILU SMASWIN HVM333 xna 3dnsaxn II CD 3YNNlal. I tlWs '-NNa ap exM'- 0 � aZ b wap .1 �]w'p"S�ePi� '30.""Arran 90 An m �-1 N1q 1 L30P1b3F33.1.A3a3P9R� / Mx3WVXm 1 x3wn3asAumw'a3marxAtl3mn NYW33s a3a tla S9ntlm x m.nNre6 ,SauCuWs rlA3>usxr3am 9E nn 1603N Sa33s an" mspllgJ130 NtlJ 03uoe : P•Iw.mgan3awl.w.qu 03aNOtltl 53W SMn330pJ p0 X3WD3dS.Wln10'O313J1'aY: Atl3mH M'tl335 S11. p0 459 • 31 COi /'ApJ 1 Ip dW5-ZO Y1dIN1Y353X9O R all IS. 03nYl5Xl 3p lM5 IgLLOa MSVa TLL XI lO 1 . ¢VS 03LLW JJA-9D ' ItwJPP]wa4anVl%mldiaN NN �� -2 B Po SSH f5 / AtlaISMAO 1 Stl A X3Mpb`] Cd S, 3p . 305 030005 p=I 1. = A313A.a NO. 3a m o3a33s an NO.. Nal rizsvmas9ntlxs N3.N3NII 1M110'03NllW1A13m1. M'Y335 NO .. a a ry1n33d1353HVM! 5 tl5 OXN'pmA3O, ;3n19 nx � INltltl MM3tl .. 1N3w3]tlle3tl M Z NNS Analer,Nn, NYS on OY.OYOtl 533W N3ND3� H3WINdSAlS1Y110'03mLW1Atl3mXNY1d 335 X IXna3tl Ntl31SVi E 33 3W iJ 304S'.. OXN ll2ryM 3 Aoa., . 3. 3. A 3B OL OJS S. ANN TV T a. ..0. lNaf 11. ,1hZ 5lwAll.A a> :1M e'2 tl0O5 10611 NAN. NO al. 021 1 311V S33. Lx3rrAl a3tl W9lunvav :y SPoS 03HNn 3p PN3lB 4Ya]3Tp AN].H3N 'Y102 3Hrc fO 0X3 Ap P313ldlO> 3O TW OXtl 03tltltl3tltl OXnp A413tl.0 51 Alp1Ni11N 33. tl N a3a0YJ3NO GO3 MI31T6 '. S33UIWI 'NVMNO x3wD3aSAaM 33.WAN3mH tMd335 pp 'XWIl1 P%L1.9 3]IgdI.N. a Od NOAI S3.3 IVJWNCAL J3.3 ,Agtl3.O 'rS553N 'a3a33z (AVXVO i 33llIp O1ntl Tla13.S)antl 3 0y a. In ... X].3HN 5Y3n NO,l SZYWe feA'a Ill, Z %WOM O'LVp 1ry130 SO .So Sr XOLLr. . 3JYL1p] TM3 S.N. NO lO' S�O.d ran Ae . A0tla. TONS 3.FOZ303]YfOY 033]3LONa 38 01 33. DNLL51X3 �{ 333tl1N33WJtl3N3 3N3Ndp]H30 Lon O..d - Me -V 35 a.., .VA.dSAVMO.Ob .A03mN .33S eA S31ON OV14 003tlxtl31WOx E tlD a. 11 m.vli emmmo N3YIIJ3dsA1TlIDbM1W1AYimN .11, 00 33.110>A%TI1N3N Z an He3 TSU LIZ maXmRlalaMJ x3wo3asummD'a3m3rw xv3mx xne33s pe roa. 3A 9a s ae lY>.VIL 113w113esAvmw•omlvwxv3mx xne33s e6 3v33O1A3NIN43N.S 5 1] lVJ-DI ..Nara. ?+IWS^PW3dortaslawD x3WD3aSAlIM10 b31JiYW Atl35Mry HVId331 W Ma5V9xEMI1D s Ld .nd ylZ tryp3waxmPWa 1331LLAt101Smnn S..N DNUVdS lOOtl 3L5'NRV 3WVx NOWWO]13Vlwlo0 AN10 OI a, 133X5 TVL30 lllS 335 In 3Y TIYHS 1M arrold 3Sa .. SH.-OlIl YYL30 3..Y '3.1LL]3 . ativONAA lax NXve r Nww .1..,,A .1.1NO..rs 35n 1tl . wl All .., dlva. mo msz. m13a aln" Van XY1lgMW3N Sa. NYa3] 3. uOTJJ AUTYIS OL 3Xr Saxvn 101 S.A... 03>nd 3p ..1. m xZ nlfpdJ.3N 3. 3a3Jtl3tln5 TV1613316 SWI W y3�O�p aMYw 3y. Xg3.3 AVNIv. 53gNYe3tlyq�A Mpf ]IlaaeJYWI nal W Bry rnrt W SAA MV,rNOS TY WJ M SWUnOS n ...S ran nllp� a SPntl .13 aan1 , Y ., L]Io.. ;.LLtl]W3 SIAtlIW'IYMnW YN mM S.I., n, .. Tlr NON 3�waM�gp]3tl QA�loona Y1rSVYn 0335.. TIYHS 1pl]Y.m] LLIINO 1aa'AVItln635 O31 3 31 ] 1. T ZZ .(o �NSOAKKA ONStl 3n 3lYAL5 �S3! 35Nn NO A.IV lnn n W NO OV30 A. l%LL Slab TgSNVId 3"OSSMVI ..13]NVON]9V Na 3]NVI A IVLLW Na . An lr.3IVN IWAI TV 3>Yb3N IZ 31Y0 Yp. n34 () 3m AW. tl Ipf SNNOUN. aXWOtl] Saar.. NI 3Y 01033NYYYna 3Y T HS IVIPd3 .1NYltl TK'OZ 3V1Y1H353tld3tl S.. NO L]3191]n 3tlY]SONVI AY 0 Al. On aill. N 3]151003] YN X alal MAI 'b'33A OleIYVtl ANr553 NIOd HDO N r .1 AHL 3N N 03YM5m] %. DMO33X ... 3.N.NRfl 13.1. ON.. ILLNa zlMVsi lA Sv 1. A n3n ..311 llv Nry11MM an ON. 1tt- eplJtl.NOJ'61 3Nwn.S an 3JN .I.AV 3 ..A p> Ir. 350. m SI...N M30 Irall 1.K I. SY ]D IW IAV Asia WfIl. On area. OI ..all 135 3a 1. S./1a 13V 3..O 3 ON.. 31LLV13Y 533. 031... TY 3NYIS -.a. SY Y w My . ]N -NN IMN IIV 'a. lOaN s L 9 0Al.. AN TWI .1 N3 o.. ON 'S1.3. zV ......I NO a3Ad - an a3 nA. M T ANS ... Try 11 IJA,. NY M 3]vfNM 3. mMN. IN To 1.1. an a33a.. N3m.N]] 3. 3AVN TA- .A ngtp N3NI.. IN I.3. 033 ANOD 1. 31LLVLN353tlaiY 1.. NO L]3 x>tlV 3tlYJSOXVI IN. IY FAIVW PMA m L(313a T HS So. oBS.I. SI a ... 01 .'ON NO lM JMlnb -1psA! M NOLLlaatl .1 oar oa'Naroo' x a- NONJa.SXOJ LMIMMYW .1..0 3nOGOd MYIXIYN an ... el am .�IrT S111.. 3artl5 NrvLm] OXY N.31n 0 ( ) Lmf N¢ wan xM r 3e lnxs z33. NOf s]wtl Wlnn wNX SMO NA. [ ..a v .w z33. Try So. "51 Sala I..N3.WSSrm 1V1N3MNN0/60X16 llv w m1M O]ONOerx O3NNm6 f] ...S 3NSON, ZI Sa30 ]XLLMIA 33. Tr w mla...N a3N3Nn A .AO -[ a... 13aNnd II ("00, OOONAAA NO .,.A) o.. l.. Arra A.. N...p AIdM Y3 ' 0fe aMLVItl X3T r ..00 al NCNAAI .1 LX31Y3antln N3LLId tlVvun. XI raoVd Alli. 3N. 3n zaMstla log ON3d.S TY Q3LtlLS.... 553Wn "9 IYMI03ArsMYNX31 NA O VA SIl Nand NO 5 Xnll ..-- 'a1I.. Salle xuo) �� NO m -ill%i'xoe %xosi9 AAn NonV&N.- SMOTW SV 3A35ASSOO �On 3IONM1.... VOn 3O3 oadA SvAlaNNA 33O lryx5I20 . 1 INCIAOI Sola I AnAvnmemLL 030.v3xr 30 Tnxs (w3A rKa lSM entlXSY.Or x0 ANAN lSls S'Al rnaY>ar.e SYAW IVY>re U > SN." IO unrw a a s Pm os d m3.M 30 . -r NPrW ON.. m.0 ONA 'S.S .m. 53p15 %oars 3Sn0] "anl moi 33. xs .. - SS3l LON r.. tl311Ya N.or. On %OS ]XN0]X3 LON r... AYU Y .. l A]I IVNNYx'3 . 3NNX33 In ",,,S B surLNls3m3N smxa0 No I]Plma. 3arxaxn 30 A wunitlo.nN 3Nrr laWl. a.Nuzens 3e mm5 lw.rn IXna all "9 NT]] ria. .S. On. lryA3oe T NS 5]x.. 3]N31No. I.Intl.rw] .1 ANI 53LLLLnm llnod I (.LLp3153LV1-1'092 rsn) .VALS ..NNN .1 OnOnIS nJMNY. 3. b nON3 S1H3MO.N ANN.. 133N IS'T IV 3T'M .. LNYb TO, 'I W I] n Aaakr Y 1M 1 ono HAI Alla rorV Mlaa lWarrO aIrrod ORYOOMW M oX5d N31x IIwO 3 Aod13. Aa TIANedr NOA a NANO 3. TYiS SONG 3111 ONLLnItl On P39W M TYm SI UNOm3NVN 335 T NOON11VISM Ol NO.d '9 INAUNANN.OL 53a.n O.S.S. 3]N3.I.. II...d Anal Or ...0. 36 AYWN SXWIV.IOILL.Id allo,103 ..A An SN3NIm01V O . INOLLY]O11XYItl AAO. MANS 3ALLYIN353tlditl S.tl3X.HO Ip 3M]50NV13.'MXI .. -A.. INVN N tla. 'L ..On. 53tlNM.3 On SMINa Ol MYIIYO tllYd3tl .111...1. S. aY ISY31 IY (9911-252-mY-I) TY] 3NJ 31YL5 N3 A. Ill.. '. . lO 1N3R3]a3WINU 3... wN.A %3 N dVXtltl 53LLi1LLn Tn 31 ]. OI .p orlm]' :S310N 3dVOSONtl IVtl3N39 I�S TI -) "=.3131tl]S Wllupmpnyaew pw� =d xna 3dnsaxn II CD 1Li O la i=yF _ � � lo .�a - I( tl 3nga ssvv 5 V 9M]Nii Ng5nVX3l 15NI' l 1 -- -------------- 111 II 11 _ 3- 1 11 O 1 � g o O' 1j /I A1 Ir II 1 �y �2 - � ENQT3YlBONOVId Ili M OIa�YaB-SIB JOl '1308 MOIL [3:1" I9(�OdpW Wllupmpnyaew pw� =d 'ArV..1p S... LY OL]nOxYJ 3X Ol 3tlY yNSAOYAtl3 3dY]30XT MLLtlOHIpf 'awn Y^N I -l -o .al,X-.-1 +Id OMOITM Mna-- I Araolatl S.Aa YA3tl XngXM 3W] yn.11 NVtl 3dv]zOX01.. '-NNa ap exM'- U30 d I.. l O.N NON. Ba b wap .1 �]w'p"S�ePi� '30.""Arran 90 An m �-1 N1q 1 L30P1b3F33.1.A3a3P9R� / Mx3WVXm 1 a3a tla S9ntlm x _ I NO s9C BM 1603N Sa33s an" mspllgJ130 NtlJ D3Wro3HS9XPo0XPSS a9SG fs ans16 /ea.I M33Tn�AZNNO..d 3l lNlg3 a310XadY m 50335 all Ap GA (S9Va^Slxa3nla OX N W SS'NS'O5NO3fIX0> 03aNOtltl 53W SMn330pJ p0 11W Sal f. S11. p0 459 • 31 COi /'ApJ 1 Ip dW5-ZO ,51 f tl3d11z, tlO3A.Ml IVJMal31. q0 = C9 • +5 pW2 / S.A.Sao I IS. 03nYl5Xl 3p lM5 IgLLOa MSVa TLL XI lO 1 . ¢VS a30xOtltl 533 AeNzp'3A0 Po JJA-9D ' E 310X M S. 3S NO NN �� -2 B Po SSH f5 / AtlaISMAO 1 Stl A X3Mpb`] Cd S, 3p . 305 030005 p=I 1. = A313A.a NO. 3a m o3a33s an NO.. Nal 3S A." . ly�d ♦.. S3M15 3 5 3Nt M dK .W N. `I` .. a a .315 ANYle 3p O1 NXYp wLLM3130 In1YM X1p15 'Y d 533p Sa OXN'pmA3O, ;3n19 nx � INltltl MM3tl .. 1N3w3]tlle3tl �53N3A3. X13ryIS S3LL]IYVA SSYtl]3a13 on OY.OYOtl 533W N3ND3� TM3 03Aa ddY NO I.. a31Wa 10 ... 030.0..1. SO SS l.. AIDILLM3N n ... a]5.�3319T0i ALLYp 1 :1 O 03tlX3.. SIA. LIA,N 3W iJ 304S'.. OXN ll2ryM 3 Aoa., . 3. 3. A 3B OL OJS S. ANN TV T a. ..0. lNaf 11. :1M e'2 tl0O5 10611 NAN. NO al. 021 1 311V S33. Lx3rrAl a3tl W9lunvav :y SPoS 03HNn 3p PN3lB 4Ya]3Tp AN].H3N 'Y102 3Hrc fO 0X3 Ap P313ldlO> 3O TW OXtl 03tltltl3tltl OXnp A413tl.0 51 Alp1Ni11N 33. tl N a3a0YJ3NO GO3 MI31T6 '. eM tl]'sP335 PLYp Ap aANOtle,d . r9o. I. �N3W $srW3me xN]NH3N 9 - a0s, Na' .M13nne I'S 11 XJ.,na) naaVA (nAn NOAI S3.3 IVJWNCAL J3.3 ,Agtl3.O 'rS553N 'a3a33z (AVXVO i 33llIp O1ntl Tla13.S)antl 3 0y a. In ... X].3HN 5Y3n NO,l SZYWe feA'a Ill, Z �1z3N ..2H L A. IN SO M] 11]5 N. O'LVp 1ry130 SO .So Sr XOLLr. . 3JYL1p] TM3 S.N. NO lO' S�O.d ran Ae . A0tla. TONS 3.FOZ303]YfOY 033]3LONa 38 01 33. DNLL51X3 �{ 53513aIMN3T' 3N3Ndp]H30 Lon O..d - Me -V 35 a.., .. Armon AN� r... raN N. andSANNAN MAN NNS. iAiNb} S31ON OV14 5310N N011VOIIddV 005/0335 SIUMUIN03N 3dV0SlJ 1Li O la i=yF _ � � lo .�a - I( tl 3nga ssvv 5 V 9M]Nii Ng5nVX3l 15NI' l 1 -- -------------- 111 II 11 _ 3- 1 11 O 1 � g o O' 1j /I A1 Ir II 1 �y �2 - � ENQT3YlBONOVId Ili M OIa�YaB-SIB JOl '1308 MOIL [3:1" I9(�OdpW 00.03. L'JX19O330tltlS/Ma3p N3a1 H>3nWOWA59tlVHlDaa3XH5 dW5-ZO 13115 JJA-9D ' Nd o31. _ _ _._-. ♦.. `I` .. a a Inan. / I/ I TIII� a. 11 IPn aaapq He3 ragiaq 9.391..01111 A atlas sxasi%3 s1 00.03. n. Nd o31. __ Inan. FORISVNDS C. PVN ME MIN Ri MG. A NLN. SPPFADpli51DE M,TNEI, MITMXG PRME0. AS NIPLIFPN\TNE [OMSME MTOEARE .PMPill OF, EEEi ETEETE REo vEME NEARES. noerv�. DVA mi Ell TEE.", ME1 ulmYrr[uoR rm va[.—I I -Iu _ __ ouo araE laR.wrmlE k 1\\` oo•nL.ar. ,,.. Nti F(IM1, so. q m amn S, o mto unpzwaw MEE fm EUM— COXDTP��EN15e LO THIIS DETH PIGS w —1. TEa SECTION A • PAE.MGLOTISWIDPPLKDECUDD - .p'°w°"""'a `�""` MINn.1UMLMRDwowmxc PR oo.aT Mw.ARU EOR GRAM EA-ewv.u'MCA i� —M- murF A x¢c xao nM- —MIT.Tw DERI SO.FE�+M�'EEE L MIN. API FOR. P 9 'ME 9 O / EE uuaur. slws oL TM To xp<L mrcnw� (CA fro SOFi,a N'OEFsI XDEAuwaEDLIME"CDFR ERE- e I. va[ar TOfRPA5i0fl MNE LVDOERSEI L T 0 STIEREEETRENELE.E.D 1 COVFA FOPiNE EUTIgE EWID j _ rte.—. -I A iL TREEI SHRUB I PERENNIAL INSTALLATION EETAIL / NOT To SCALE HALL & HALL ENCINFFRS. INC. A PLAN VIEW STANDARD PLANTING PIT DETAIL FOR PARKING LOT BIO LIFE PLASMA SERVICES IN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 5-0" Mc�„4L mEE51NMN CWSERUGEIpI oRo ro BE vvEo a -o' mal ER.Na m GMS"' N \ `EXEC sS POPE mom -o STEEL B' -U' CC iENE, ZflS' ECIME, REM TEM APWND TPEE. IS. 5-0" E o PLAN El EYARGN UNSLING TREE PROTECTION E CLUSION FENCING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SHEET 9 SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.0 — 1331N3753]I/Sf3S vwsvla 3dnule jinS of P1In8 51 3 31IH 0 S V ©R11❑ -- MolierJo>alavNswemu43ooa - _ N0I1tlA313 H100S -, J Mmmaw3mdnxamlolsswn -_ as Movairow3mdnJsw, d-eralSMm v a33WA31o3s3inxlaxs NOOI HSINIJ A - - 4N3i1%pAWbSN130H0TN1tl Ttl]4ML .. .. I 3NNJM'NJINA31p1S31tl1tlSWNHtl:19 .-. glxaMJ 013HNLrM 53E55AxIW ftE - .. .__ ... IYIKW'A]OHHHOir]NS32HA111W14'aS— � _ _. Otl3HM NIM s •. �_ I .. -�- -_ .• 3aaro]mlmwmir]xe3rswnaow zore � Nolee 91 _ _ _ — -_ - ' � �/ I I'' 'dLL 1156Ytl Wi1N3il3n !/ � - l9ronaomuavl]3w]svo13{3ns LNJ 315h#WJI9WNtN aa] - '3.W13lBItlaYMMf0:IS 1p10]3tl9tS'SIMS M34fYMflls -l3fId 311Sb/p]IYWpyIN:l-d] XNMMWaio3eilM /_ SSNS®I.Mm531b]pn �-1NISA5 ] msl»Irvur33w43sxlsW to / HY%I TTYk1Yq ATIM3[3LLiroMW1M]YY9MVIN:-,t�l]m ,3ava3usoawJ ' �isuMooNlnW-Hsmlxa�omtl _ J W W6Y'IN ZNJ -__ lora N0IltlA3l3 HLNON0N Z'L aero inroaaAmmuxtimwnlamrnvmro: 'auhxauneam� 13lpd 3lKmW YtlYIAYfIN 4UJ / L� �- �_�swrrnv3savlvrvumsNrewrl3wmxs9uu Ly 8xa P91miXinwUY534w0TMN iGEb NLM 3TM1mmIM losv tlAOLWm 53MOXNIH]IpITMAN 'NBNNA'3p6LTNIbflWNN:IS 0 9Na3aSt2yp]Y/r�MIN TdJ glg3]36p1N313y-.LAE1Mi[OlbNdilS w91SASMWaM ¢ia]yry Wil]1pWWE AIIMYY3LL"iNN19tlllNJMXWx/ I'M] S3Nd 31160fp]YIYIVYIN:Itl0 RMNUA Wx3S3a t maNISa31'Ma 30NBNTba Uidd31663[tl]IUBS 1 o3XYIa3xeY]NLTi9 -UpA383PMSa3I1W S31tlM]d 53111 Q31TV A W 99 NJOR H SM 41M M M p 3 W tl 3WAYalarowi3mrclMave•M #{ Mow3loumauanx3allolSMm _ 93maaumMra]IvwvnnxaJ I a' ' avdaiummo]wvrvnndw Yfi15AS MCCMMYiYM,N ®E]WtlW3U � %IMOIB AiMrtl341 TtlAVW11rp WW0TN:1-MJ� NLroMITPb1YA tlJ100 ` 40.V N0I1tlA3l31SV3ltlLLNRM tld -J mixa,3lou3vn HIIX1V531N'Mr l(pNNA31pISM1104MWnq la NIH3.'011]NFWIO]P[Il31g3r]INd3D6AlIWll:1-!V 36-XMg1: dN NAt34 UMi1N3J W�OaINSYNS SM4aM'J mM11.51p3 r'.gld 38S`1MMIY 2'tlB xmvaiamrroXiow nwaaav O1 a333tl-XMp3Wa RRNa031J3W>W Ol3tlVloS 1plpININM'SIXp' 6SYiJ R3160W W✓i6f]HYaroISIMSN6RW ltl1iYNN6Mf39d.10 93lY.pNHJ1%IMIYN0 SSYp03140m 531tl.Y]nN]I0N MlCfAl] tmJVNM WilsuxoaalAvdwMnra�ona `au'llml"uleu�oNwwxwa3a3m3m maJh3xoNSAlmar3+t velaxsMmMMwvmvinM3asoxro INNNWIN:WA] bYi11113M]]B AINMl3LLYNIMtlrllN' NCMIIN 1 -AV �8Wd3aSYMrS]]YBW05]NZ'dJ BNd 31MAYN VYYMYlM 2dJ EYe 311SU.-0pJ wwnwnv N,p 93roa3mm�x-nlvvmnn u,3J � eu'1nlalure LvmoHux3Wrc3ms31n 9AM1]36 Ol x3fla-1ATil%KKOaMY d315 6'3PM15%RIOtl 3SN5)aptl 03dd316631y.1Y3i1®MImNStlO 'H03W N0IltlA3131S3M ltlllMVdNtld m3an3ul4xm X3[avls 3x91Jxv'Ln]•3s'iuols�mvs]waro.la ��, sa3lmJAvxnvM 30NIITry1tl N]WAL lNM111]3a6M 1 1tlLECfIN51NQA AaN2W1:H5 I I - �W3ISA4 M0141M WdmI1N S B `/\ Q32NriN hV31JH3'M!'0ATMMSIL / `�ZJ �9.Zb qb.Z 1ZvZ Z TVMarv3wavruanx'a-xa L "1 I" I � � aatlGx3lWaf sLVJpxlx]L0HMY Al mga3uw`aw]wvmeirv�l-m � _ >vvai�rcm9x rvvM`e]n:sxJ 'du'1uImlNNomom3ntla3a393uw � ixmuasa a]ixMoxslen Juav �Nm3�m aJwwvmroaa] / aNaai3rsoarro]vxwvnn N-dJ /� y rrMsrsMmlw vrvlwnna3noorlraim] ._- N3r0adAlNXN311TONIdVIIYIJWWWYIN1'M] - 9p11.36M1C333tl-.[AVL%YINN4N d316634N9a3Ipa 31M116 X31MN UidelS431tl]Y)ES3N103bW M 91 H al sl el 3aouer]oielcvJ.¢mxava3oov N0I1tlA313 H100S -, J Mmmaw3mdnxamlolsswn v NOOI HSINIJ A 4N3i1%pAWbSN130H0TN1tl Ttl]4ML .. .. I HHd]]301F1111tl1N1tt I%MLNtldA AbpAH1:195 .-. glxaMJ 013HNLrM 53E55AxIW ftE - .. .__ ... ..-. ... ...... Otl3HM NIM s - W3Nx]n]amwsmirxe�ervwowrae --�A-�EL Nolee 91 - ' � �/ I I'' 'dLL 1156Ytl Wi1N3il3n !/ � — du'umure6L xuMMwwmxum �� NIP'NS#pM'NJNLin LNJ 315h#WJI9WNtN aa] - '3.W13lBItlaYMMf0:IS -l3fId 311Sb/p]IYWpyIN:l-d] ' I SSNS®I.Mm531b]pn �-1NISA5 ] $ / HY%I TTYk1Yq ATIM3[3LLiroMW1M]YY9MVIN:-,t�l]m NYM3LL �isuMooNlnW-Hsmlxa�omtl _ IxsvNSlMrovewaooa __nws�alrsvnamNiln lora N0IltlA3l3 HLNON0N au}usorowixa3313n � '' -, er e ! '. xlours3m]m'lroxnn / ' ' \, L _ � 'au'Tralue 'dutvsalraw t 56tlbo31SW3 43n'NNIW'3MMi�IW1 ai3l3nH1IXW83MYAY'N] WdH W M N and N b WY N J MN'3 R Y MN Y:IS �) YBISASMWdU WYWIN�_I IOLV lAgd 31160-0'p]WIWW1ry--Itl] 5 M3aWINadi1]k31NLa AlNXa3LL _ i0M4NLYl]WrMN:{-AV 4 \. 9tl1lR Ol mi3n �-axoAie3mxsminvs3m:ru[sinnoixsm smro]mmpe .A -A =AIL Ianxo3tm3lJslsuxuq sln33s-Xamrvm X3u3vud-3Oya3o] Irevtg3ru31zlmu'Mr333s-ww]rJme N0I1tlA3l31Sb3 Z AJ 1)B]MW XLMY OL slbY1 W.XNilIL3LHpd lyd IM Q3N3S0MRN9M09 ix3'YA�StlICLLVM�I4WN1Cfd311ilMNd:1-ld N00'Li HSINIj /1 --Sllfltlp]PL3HIMNM]NO3EISAIIW11:4-ll0 - IU �- gesWlmmlmx wi xvas3re'xonoarz]N NOINS'0'1 r r _____ _ _ _ _/ _._ S6YF m1ECItlf SLYlXP11XS1NiM1bYrL -- --- - ____ `aulxvllnen3zvNxuM3xvai4imuv L �laei � � �,3roam�mroorrvsmxaa] l\ y p \Brod 31M5Nb]NN391H:Itl] _\ % \ _ \ A` l/ VBISA9MY VW IYWWlNR3lKKlntl 'ZL uSL LL 'n 1vl lZv� \b Zl laro `? `?/ v ZE 6'E B b... vsm larouOAmroA+tTaAwrvumwlvenx:l-An] v S� 51K11]35 u1mNtl-,L Al31tl�A0W39d313 63M1R1QIpn 3Pr15 N3IAy P3M31S Slltl]gi 63111 Q316gp Mii4:6LNMNgIS3W �A-= •.......................�........... • 3%IISEyiii3WnW6ry9`3110M9 • NOLLtlA3l91S3M ' f1161r10. Y1331p3'UN03D6AIf01lI:C1R 3 M HMOONIM �� M61rp]mpr6Ny r]Ia0310 dV YpCdY S19' NOINS'0'1 -xnoaaav9Wm avla3uwvo13tdlws i aoJmnlnla'X suarWessxpwu IM'A.'BbtltlN13Y Q35MAW {S W3IYASMIXYdY '1'BrMMI1N¢�ftl W310 %iY]ad ATIVnMNn311 itlMWtlllYl]41W0lIry:I M] irlm{I]ss3rswN aaaurd lw.r33s-1-1e'�uons eswemuna 3801131¢JJMIW7]HMgSNNNfln Tttl QV1lIMV6V31J1biO3 veAau MmdMupaeuou nvmnx:l� N]ILNIOm W3MF INa3Wx4KK4tlM31]IS rnao3WueoJssdlmwJ3W:usa3lax IBSC]q (filA31CIW 'W 3YJIS m03MN3tlNJPYMM NI W V53VNMY'N] N[iA JMBWi 1331'l.3pLS211 aVMK9N:16 31tl]63rN14 V3LIVS/i"MW annamx-xxnas ysasuonJ rYNJ lXgl3LY3:1y4 IW4IW9RIJa3]W LYMiIBA NWN3k e'3M1JI3YMM 3xxeaeamaealom IMvdwu:fla OID4..M1^ Y W31'A1WNN vaso MousurnwaeiW nw9mnn:r sual'lvuvrn4ox-wlsulxrcx3aosTali smmlMv Jiwwu]Wvm39Mv AtlIPIIRMnproJ 13Atltl 3lMb'UJI'YYIB'NN SS sNINY1tl1MM35 CN-W314A91MYH3d]'A� 4Mm1lM:1NMIa H3 W LNSVMY ANp MW ]bYl] Hrod311660Y1]IYYdW N.YG vvwnnrao aanl ANOYOtl] 4xxswx13na3smmadT tlou]3loaaludmAanaul[sawml rJNre rnaJisxmm ssmaw]3owlm3lon 'OJ3ll9 r]PRAM]#Ery'V3rYWTtl31My1 J6WIpM Np35pAl2VIJJ rJIaaYYKMY Yea Jwu]3mne utuswarvalvuslowam r]Iae rnaaslalem ssmww]mvom�w 'W 3Y19r41e9.W]MWiYML]tlyWW1 1LH@NWIWW6¢NY01]] W rJmeunun.l�e . 1n03HOS S3HSINIH HUIN31N3 _ llmWlrno4 -ails aavrdnies3ealsM[Iwwuv saroo3woevsaxnaola3lzarn s aru9uss33mvxouvnsa x aaavmwmma N3svrw 3sn olsxouvdmlxlvwwxmr]ma z '1]31fINY/MIpMJ31W WXW] '.IDp163A1L9.031NNd 30o liVW] - Mdl]3131p9MNSl] 36L1K3'1 'S310N ltla3N39 SNOUVA313 HOIH31N3 H 6 r 0 0I$WNYIINNN6ap3rS�R3a6 WrIIX%Yra I ! --�A-�EL -- --ssa•avmNi suvdlW,vNuvdmlaxa � a3roamrsawmwvmnxz-a] I � I � � $ �roe3usmwwwwevrn Ne] ��� �isuMooNlnW-Hsmlxa�omtl _ V LL� - S'LL Z'L aero inroaaAmmuxtimwnlamrnvmro: 'auhxauneam� L� �- �_�swrrnv3savlvrvumsNrewrl3wmxs9uu Ly 8xa P91miXinwUY534w0TMN iGEb NLM 3TM1mmIM losv nbLLWYM1x W131]31H]hY0131dN4SNOYV IY 'NBNNA'3p6LTNIbflWNN:IS 0 9Na3aSt2yp]Y/r�MIN TdJ glg3]36p1N313y-.LAE1Mi[OlbNdilS w91SASMWaM ¢ia]yry Wil]1pWWE AIIMYY3LL"iNN19tlllNJMXWx/ I'M] S3Nd 31160fp]YIYIVYIN:Itl0 maNISa31'Ma 30NBNTba Uidd31663[tl]IUBS 1 o3XYIa3xeY]NLTi9 x3iKslenx]BRN]3YJ 3WAYalarowi3mrclMave•M f1161r10. Y1331p3'UN03D6AIf01lI:C1R 3 M HMOONIM �� M61rp]mpr6Ny r]Ia0310 dV YpCdY S19' NOINS'0'1 -xnoaaav9Wm avla3uwvo13tdlws i aoJmnlnla'X suarWessxpwu IM'A.'BbtltlN13Y Q35MAW {S W3IYASMIXYdY '1'BrMMI1N¢�ftl W310 %iY]ad ATIVnMNn311 itlMWtlllYl]41W0lIry:I M] irlm{I]ss3rswN aaaurd lw.r33s-1-1e'�uons eswemuna 3801131¢JJMIW7]HMgSNNNfln Tttl QV1lIMV6V31J1biO3 veAau MmdMupaeuou nvmnx:l� N]ILNIOm W3MF INa3Wx4KK4tlM31]IS rnao3WueoJssdlmwJ3W:usa3lax IBSC]q (filA31CIW 'W 3YJIS m03MN3tlNJPYMM NI W V53VNMY'N] N[iA JMBWi 1331'l.3pLS211 aVMK9N:16 31tl]63rN14 V3LIVS/i"MW annamx-xxnas ysasuonJ rYNJ lXgl3LY3:1y4 IW4IW9RIJa3]W LYMiIBA NWN3k e'3M1JI3YMM 3xxeaeamaealom IMvdwu:fla OID4..M1^ Y W31'A1WNN vaso MousurnwaeiW nw9mnn:r sual'lvuvrn4ox-wlsulxrcx3aosTali smmlMv Jiwwu]Wvm39Mv AtlIPIIRMnproJ 13Atltl 3lMb'UJI'YYIB'NN SS sNINY1tl1MM35 CN-W314A91MYH3d]'A� 4Mm1lM:1NMIa H3 W LNSVMY ANp MW ]bYl] Hrod311660Y1]IYYdW N.YG vvwnnrao aanl ANOYOtl] 4xxswx13na3smmadT tlou]3loaaludmAanaul[sawml rJNre rnaJisxmm ssmaw]3owlm3lon 'OJ3ll9 r]PRAM]#Ery'V3rYWTtl31My1 J6WIpM Np35pAl2VIJJ rJIaaYYKMY Yea Jwu]3mne utuswarvalvuslowam r]Iae rnaaslalem ssmww]mvom�w 'W 3Y19r41e9.W]MWiYML]tlyWW1 1LH@NWIWW6¢NY01]] W rJmeunun.l�e . 1n03HOS S3HSINIH HUIN31N3 _ llmWlrno4 -ails aavrdnies3ealsM[Iwwuv saroo3woevsaxnaola3lzarn s aru9uss33mvxouvnsa x aaavmwmma N3svrw 3sn olsxouvdmlxlvwwxmr]ma z '1]31fINY/MIpMJ31W WXW] '.IDp163A1L9.031NNd 30o liVW] - Mdl]3131p9MNSl] 36L1K3'1 'S310N ltla3N39 SNOUVA313 HOIH31N3 H 6 r 0 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 1011-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR A NEW 16,692 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON COUNTY ROAD 10, WEST OF WOODALE DRIVE; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE DE2014-001 WHEREAS, Build to Suit, Inc., has submitted a development review to construct a new 16,692 square foot single story building on vacant property on County Road 10; and, WHEREAS, the lots in question is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development; and, WHEREAS, the subject parcels are legally described as: Sec 08, Tn 30, Rn 23, Ex N Ft For Co Rd H2 Park Of NW % of NW % of SE % Nely Of L Par With And 150 Ft Nely From Cl Of Sth 10/62 I_,R:1 Part Of SW % Of NW % Of SE % Nely Of L Park With & 150 Ft Nely From CI Of Sth 10/62 (Subj to Rd & Esmts) in Sec 08, Tn, Rn 23 PIN's 08-30-23-42-0001 and 08-30-23-42-0012 WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View City Code requires all new commercial development to be reviewed by the Planning Commission for consistency with all codes, regulations and requirements; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents relative to this request: 1. Staff Report 2. Zoning Map 3. Site Plans 4. Aerial View 5. Photographic Documentation NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request by Build to Suit, Inc. for a new commercial building for BioLife Plasma Services and recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Build to Suit, Inc. shall enter into various agreements with the City including (but not limited to) a Developers Agreement. Resolution 11111-14 Page 2 2. Build to Suit, Inc. shall obtain, if applicable, permits from Rice Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, MN Department of Health, MN Pollution Control Agency, Ramsey County, and the City of Mounds View before starting construction. 3. The applicant shall install asphalt and sod, and landscape all disturbed areas and replace trees no later than 60 days beyond issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, weather permitting. 4. The applicant shall make any City required changes to the grading and drainage plans prior to building permits being issued. 5. Snow storage on the site shall not reduce the amount of parking spaces available. 6. The garbage enclosure shall be constructed with the same materials used for the building to maintain a consistent appearance. 7. The applicant shall reimburse the City for all fees and costs related to this development review, including, but not limited to, city attorney and engineer consultants. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 16th day of July, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chairperson ATTEST: James Ericson City Administrator (SEAL) PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting July 2, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Carvelli-Yu. To appoint Commissioner Birken as Acting Chair of the Planning Commission. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Acting Chair Birken at 7:00 p.m. for July 2, 2014. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Birken, Carvelli-Yu, Elofson, Love, and Rundle. Absent and Excused: Commissioners Schiltgen and Stevenson. Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller. Index to Minutes Page Approval of Minutes I MA2014-002 Consideration of a 4 lot Major Subdivision at 8211 Red Oak 2 Drive and a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion 3 3. Approval of Minutes May 21, 2014. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Love/Commissioner Carvelli-Yu. To approve the Minutes of the May 21, 2014 regular Planning Commission meeting as slightly amended. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting July 2, 2014 Page 2 Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. 5. Planning Cases A. MA2014-002 Consideration of a 5 lot Major Subdivision at 8211 Red Oak Drive and a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments Applicant: Kayak Remodeling & Redevelopment Address: 951 Hillwind Road, Fridley Planning Associate Heller indicated Terry Buchanan, representing Kayak Remodeling & Redevelopment, has submitted an application for a major subdivision of the east two acres of 8211 Red Oak Drive and a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment. The proposed subdivision would create 5 additional lots from the existing one lot and change the land use designation of the two acres from church (CH) to single family detached (SFD). Associate Heller explained that Abiding Savior Church owns the property at 8211 Red Oak Drive, which is a 7 -acre parcel with a church building and large parking lot. This property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, but the Comprehensive Plan Existing and Future Land Use Maps designate the property as "church." The proposed subdivision would create five new single-family buildable lots, which would be consistent with the existing zoning of the property, but not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. All of the lots shown on the preliminary plat meet the minimum lot size requirements. Staff reviewed the estimated land value and recommended the Planning Commission approve Resolution 10 10- 14 recommending approval of the preliminary plat and Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments. Acting Chair Birken requested further information on the infiltration basin. Associate Heller discussed how storm water would flow through the site and sit in the basin for 24 to 48 hours. She did not anticipate that the basin would have standing water at all times. Acting Chair Birken opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. Terry Buchanan, the applicant with Kayak Remodeling & Redevelopment, discussed the five single-family homes that he would be creating. Commissioner Carvelli-Yu asked if additional trees could be required, given the fact the area was heavily wooded. Mr. Buchanan explained that none of the mature oaks would be removed. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting Acting Chair Birken closed the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. July 2, 2014 Page 3 MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Carvelli-Yu. To approve Resolution 1010-14, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Preliminary Plat and Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments; Planning Case No. MA2014-002. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 6. Other Planning Activity A. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion Planning Associate Heller informed the Commission that the corridor continues to be the City Council's priority, and the Planning Commission has been reviewing the Zoning Code in order to better promote and accommodate development along County Road 10. Associate Heller explained that the Commission has been discussing creating a Corridor Overlay District in order to give more flexibility to new development projects on the corridor. The City is willing to be flexible on requirements such as setbacks, parking, density and height, but the City also wants projects that are high quality. Associate Heller reported an updated draft of the overlay district language is attached and a resolution is available for action if the Commission is ready to move forward with this new overlay district. Staff has made four changes since the discussion at the Council Worksession meeting. A new chapter 1128 in the City Code was created for this overlay district instead of inserting the new language into an existing chapter, so the numbering is now completely different. The section about the City having the option to not require a development area to comply with the overlay district was removed because in 1128.05 the zoning districts that would be applicable are listed. There is also a new addition of 1128.04, OTHER REQUIREMENTS, which specifies that any deviation from the overlay district chapter must comply with Chapter 1125.02 of the City Code, which is about variances. Commissioner Rundle thanked staff for her efforts on this Ordinance. Acting Chair Birken agreed stating a separate chapter gave greater clarity for the overlay district. Commissioner Love offered a language change to Chapter 1128.04, inserting the word variance. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Love/Commissioner Carvelli-Yu. To approve Resolution 1009-14, a Resolution Amending the City Code Title 1100 Creating a County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District; Special Planning Case No. 187-13 with the language change. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 7. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. July 16, 2014 B. August 6, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. June 4, 2014 July 2, 2014 Page 4 The Commission discussed the June 4, 2014 meeting minutes. No changes were made. 9. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases of a development review. 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports None. 11. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Acting Chair Birken adjourned the meeting at 7:41 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA August 20, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: July 2, 2014 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases A. VR2014-00 Consideration of a Variance for a Reduced Driveway Setback Applicant: Corbin Hilgeman Address: 7851 Spring Lake Road 6. Other Planning Activity /_m►rem 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, September 3, 2014 B. Wednesday, September 17, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. July 16, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion MO_ A T S i rf Item No: 5A uN� `/ Meeting Date: August 20, 2014 Type of Business: Planning Case City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing - Consideration of a Variance for a Reduced Driveway Setback at 7851 Spring Lake Road; Planning Case VR2014-006 Introduction: The applicant, Corbin Hilgeman, is requesting approval of a variance for a reduced driveway setback on his property at 7851 Spring Lake Road. The applicant recently built a detached garage in the backyard and now wants to extend the existing driveway to connect to the new garage. This extended driveway will run past the house and be closer than five feet to the property line so the applicant has requested a reduced driveway setback variance. Discusssion: The applicant will be accessing the new garage in the backyard, so he will be installing a 10 foot wide driveway from the existing driveway around the house to the garage. The existing attached garage/house has about a 10 foot setback so where the new driveway runs next to the house, it would have an 8 -inch setback. The remainder of the driveway will have a 5 -foot setback. The Zoning Code states that the Planning Commission may issue a variance to provide relief to the landowner in those cases where the Code imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the property owner's land. This is true for all variance requests. State statutes require that the governing body review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. These criteria are set forth in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. A variance may be granted only in the event that all of the following circumstances exist: a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of these regulations. The zoning code requires minimum driveway setbacks for aesthetics and to provide separation and some sense of privacy between neighbors. Homes are typically placed with the garage side having the least amount of setback, making it difficult to access the rear yards. Older homes rarely have more than a 2 -car garage so it is becoming more common for residents to have second garages in the backyard. b. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not specify setback criteria, but it does support improvements to properties. 7851 Sgting Lake Read Variance Reboil August 20, 2014 Page 2 C. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Title or the City Code. The property owner has built a detached garage in the backyard for space to park vehicles inside and for storage. The Zoning Code requires an improved surface driveway for garages that are accessed regularly, and there is not enough room next to the house for a driveway to have a five foot setback. The reduced setback would not be the full length of the driveway. d. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this Title has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. This house was originally built in 1938 and had a few additions constructed over the years. This property has also had property line adjustments on the north and south sides because of original building placement of homes and garages on the street. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The applicant's neighborhood consists of different sized lots, and is wooded. The new driveway will have no effect on the look of the property from the street. The neighbor's house that would be most affected by the reduced setback of the driveway is separated from the proposed driveway by a wooded area. f. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The 4 -foot 4 -inch variance is the minimum variance needed since that is what the Zoning Code requires for a driveway setback. g. The Planning Commission may impose such conditions upon the premises benefited by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established by this Title or to reduce or minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Staff has no suggestions for conditions for the variance request. The Planning Commission may add conditions as they see applicable. Public Hearing: As with any requested variance, this application requires a public hearing. Staff mailed notices to all property owners within 350 feet of the applicant's property and a notice was published in the Sun Focus newspaper on Friday, August 8, 2014. Staff has not received any comments or questions as of August 15, 2014. 7£351 Spring Lake Road Variance Repot August 20, 2014 Page 3 Recommendation: After taking testimony from staff, the applicant and affected neighbors, the Commission may take any of the following actions below related to the requests. Staff recommends approval of this variance. Approval of the Variance as requested. Staff has prepared Resolution 1012-14 that approves the variance if the Commission chooses this action. 2. Choose to deny the variance. If the Commission chooses this option, Staff would need direction from the Planning Commission to prepare a resolution of denial with findings of fact to support the denial. 3. Table the request. If the Planning Commission needs more information before making a decision or if they decide that there is need for more discussion, the Commission can simply move to table the request until such information has been provided. Because of 60 -day requirements, the Commission would need to act upon the request as soon as reasonably possible to avoid an inadvertent approval. ti Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Views 3. Site Plan 4. Photos 5. Resolution 1012-14 Zoning Map 101 VVVVI IVVVJ Z i Spring Lak( 0,,v . —A-2 II IMI N1111O 8045 8025 ■ -Mv C n°fi 775871 7748767 -a7718. y� .L m N 773 N 7765 1 00 8016 8015 p N m 7985 � 798 � 7735 "R I 4. 7955 N R-3 N c 7934 7933 0 791 N 1� N 7661 7860 7835 7850 7821 N N 780 7801 N 7786 7791 7781 n�m 7785 775871 7748767 -a7718. 80461 8045 773 7775 7765 773729 8016 8015 8000 7755 772 7985 798 23 7735 7960 7965 7955 00795 7714115 N m 7686 ro 769 7685 N N 7680 p 7669 7670 7563 7670 7665 7660 N M N R-4 . Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential 8075 80461 8045 8036 8025 8026 8016 8015 8000 8005 7990 7985 798 7975 7960 7965 7955 00795 N 7934 7933 7932 n 1� N N M N R-4 . Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential Aerial View N The yellow lines indicate the proposed new driveway area Narrative from Applicant This variance request is for a small piece of driveway which, although it would be within the side setback, would still be well within the property line and the natural tree line between this property and the lot to the south. A detailed survey has been performed to verify the distance from the proposed driveway to the lot line. This is represented on the permit application drawing. There will be no impact to said tree line, so there will be no impact to the immediately neighboring property, visual or otherwise. Below is an explanation of how each of the seven required criteria for the granting of a variance is met in this case. 1. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Title. The purpose of this variance is not incongruous with the intent of the Mounds View Zoning Code. It merely seeks to improve the surface of the existing earthen drive leading to the back of the property. 2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed section of driveway that would reside inside the setback region of this lot would not alter the function of the property or detract from its visual appearance. 3. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Title or the City Code. The end goal of this process is to install a proper driveway to provide stable, sustainable vehicle access to the detached garage on the rear of the property. While this property use is permitted without a variance, the fact that such a driveway would violate the side setback of 5ft makes a variance necessary prior to proceeding with this permitted property use. 4. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the same zone or vicinity, and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this Title has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. Due to the width of this lot (75ft) combined with the location and shape of the existing home on the property (all of which was in existence prior to the applicant's ownership of the property), there is no way to route a usable (10ft wide) driveway into the back yard of the property without violating the 5ft side setback. 5. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. This small piece of driveway within the setback area, but still within the property line and natural tree line separating this property from the lot to the south, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. G. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Narrative from Applicant Continued As can be seen on the drawing, the only portion of the driveway that requires violating the 5ft side setback is the approximately 40ft of length it takes to get around the existing house. Prior to reaching the house and after passing the house, the driveway will meet the 5ft side setback requirement. 7. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may impose such conditions upon the premises benefited by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established by this Code, or to reduce or minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Understood. m I h Site Plan I m 9- m I a M - ma r. ij11111 u' Rte+ 1. �.: Via.. ... 4 c> .y .*pig �I' P � 4 3T� �� ,a. r ,r � , ^� m � . r� r» 1 's i,. _ cR *� �'%�s� .' ���� �.d j�U ; .�•�.._ j Y � � t b '�'.• RF.a `� �I 111111 i,�i�, � - - - .� � r :m �� s MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1012-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A FOUR -FOOT FOUR -INCH SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A DRIVEWAY AT 7851 SPRING LAKE ROAD; PLANNING CASE VR2014-006 WHEREAS, property owner Corbin Hilgeman, has applied for a four -foot four -inch (4'-4") setback variance to allow the driveway leading around the house to the garage in the backyard to have a reduced setback; and, WHEREAS, the subject property, located at 7851 Spring Lake Road is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and is legally described as follows: Registered Land Survey 591, Tract C, Ramsey County, Minnesota PIN: 06-30-23-34-0094 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial View 3. Photographic Documentation 4. Staff Report WHEREAS, Section 1104.01 Subd. 4c(1a) of the Mounds View Zoning Code indicates that driveways shall be set back at least five feet (5); and, WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to allow a driveway to have an eight (8) inch setback; and, WHEREAS, the purpose of the variance provision in the Zoning Code is to give relief to property owners when the strict enforcement of the zoning code requirements imposes a hardship thereby restricting the improvement of property due to practical difficulties brought about by unique or extraordinary features of the physical property that are beyond the property owner's control; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly -noticed public hearing regarding this request on August 20, 2014; and, WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all must be satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. Resolution 1012-14 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient practical difficulty with regard to the property located at 7851 Spring Lake Road, and makes the following findings of fact related to its decision: 1. The general intent of the Zoning Code regarding setbacks is to create physical separation between driveways for aesthetics and a sense of privacy for the property owners. There is a wooded area and 20 feet between the new driveway and the neighboring house, and the new driveway will only have the reduced setback along the garage. 2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the applicant is improving the property. 3. The applicant is requesting this variance because the driveway will run past the house that only has a setback of 10 feet, and in order to have a 9 foot wide drive aisle past the house, the driveway setback will be eight (8) inches. 4. This property has had lot line adjustments and additions constructed that left limited room on the south side of the house. 5. There will be little change to the existing character of the neighborhood since the new driveway area won't be very visible. 6. The 4 -foot 4 -inch variance is the minimum variance required to alleviate the applicant's practical difficulty since that is what the zoning code requires for driveway setbacks. 7. The Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the premises as may be necessary to comply with city standards and to minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission, based upon the above findings, approves the variance request of Corbin Hilgeman, owner of 7851 Spring Lake Road, to allow a driveway to have an 8 -inch setback where it runs next to the house. Adopted this 20th day of August, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting July 16, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for July 16, 2014. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Elofson, Love, Rundle, Schiltgen, and Stevenson. Absent and Excused: Commissioner Birken and Carvelli-Yu. Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller. Index to Minutes Page Approval of Minutes I DE2014-001 Development Review for a new commercial building on 2 County Road 10, west of Woodale Drive 3. Approval of Minutes June 4, 2014. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Elofson/Commissioner Love. To approve the Minutes of the June 4, 2014 regular Planning Commission meeting as presented. 4. None. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 5. Planning Cases July 16, 2014 Page 2 A. DE2014-001 Development Review for a new commercial building on County Road 10, west of Woodale Drive Applicant: Build to Suit, Inc., representing BioLife Plasma Services Address: 1805 State Street, Bettendorf, IA Planning Associate Heller indicated BioLife Plasma Services has been located in Mounds View for several years and is currently leasing space at 2222 Woodale Drive, in the Mounds View Business Park. They now want their own building and have a purchase agreement to buy the vacant land on the east side of the Mounds View Motors car dealership on County Road 10. Multi -Tech, 2205 Woodale Drive, is the owner of the vacant land. Build to Suit, Inc. is the developer for this site and is requesting a development review for a new 16,692 square foot building to be built on the south side of the site, fronting County Road 10. Associate Heller explained that BioLife will be creating two lots from the land they are purchasing and will sell the north lot in the future. A major subdivision application will be submitted in the coming weeks. A new building will allow the company to continue its success in Mounds View and the north metro. She estimated that construction would take seven to nine months. She anticipated that BioLife would move their existing sign to the new location. Staff reviewed the plans in further detail and recommended approval of Resolution 1011-14, which approves the plans submitted by Build to Suit, Inc. for a new 16,692 square foot building for a BioLife Plasma Services facility. She noted the representative from Build to Suit, Inc. wasn't in attendance because he had plane trouble and was stuck in Rochester. Chair Stevenson expressed concern with the landscaping plan and how it would be reviewed. Associate Heller indicated the City no longer had a forester to review the tree and landscape situation. She commented staff would review the landscaping issue and a financial guarantee would be required. She reviewed City Code requirements for tree replacement and anticipated that the applicant would meet the City requirements. Commissioner Schiltgen asked if the City's approval had any bearing on the watershed permit. Associate Heller reported building permits would not be given out until the applicant received approval from Ramsey County and the watershed district. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Schiltgen/Commissioner Rundle. To approve Resolution 1011-14, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Development Review for a New 16,692 Square Foot Commercial Building on County Road 10, West of Woodale Drive; Planning Case No. DE2014-001. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission July 16, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 3 6. Other Planning Activity None. 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. August 6, 2014 j B. August 20, 2014 i 8. Review Minutes: I A. July 2, 2014 The Commission discussed the July 2, 2014 meeting minutes. 9. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases f Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. i' 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports Chair Stevenson invited all to attend Music in the Park on July 17`h for the Teddy Bear Band at Silver View Park. 11. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver OffSite Secretarial, Inc. MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA September 17, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: July 16, 2014 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases A. CU2014-001 Consideration of a 150 -foot Cell Tower at 4860 Mustang Circle Applicant: FAC Holdings LLC/Dell-Comm Address: 4860 Mustang Circle B. VR2014-007 Consideration of a Variance for a Reduced Rear Yard Setback Applicant: Gerald & Melanie Lind Address: 2624 Ardan Avenue C. MA2014-003 Consideration of a Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat Applicant: Multi -Tech Systems Address: 2205 Woodale Drive 6. Other Planning Activity A. None 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, October 1, 2014 B. Wednesday, October 15, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. August 20, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion p. MOUNDS �. MV Item No: `/1L.yV Meeting Date: September 17, 201414 Type of Business: Planning Case City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for a 150 foot Cell Tower at 4860 Mustang Circle, Dell -Comm; Planning Case CU2014-001 Introduction: The applicant and property owner, FAC Holdings (Dell -Comm is the business operating here), is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to construct a 150 foot cell tower on their property at 4860 Mustang Circle. Dell -Comm designs, furnishes and installs telecommunications systems, applications and services. They have been in business since 1990 and do infrastructure cabling, fiber optic cabling, outside plant cabling, security solutions and telephone systems. City Code Requirements: Section 1124.03, Subd. 2: Allows for towers and antennae as a conditional use in specific districts. Industrial districts allow towers and antennae up to 150 feet tall. Section 1124.05 Subd. 1 Setbacks: The minimum setback from any property line or public right-of-way for a wireless telecommunications tower is thirty feet (30') unless abutting a residential district, then at least half the height of the tower. When placed on a lot improved with a principal building, the wireless telecommunications tower shall be located only in the rear yard or interior side yards not abutting streets. Wireless telecommunication towers shall not be placed between the principal building and any street abutting the property. Setbacks for accessory equipment structures associated with wireless telecommunication towers and antennae shall meet the requirements as outlined in Section 1104.01, subdivision 4 of the Zoning Code. Section 1125.01, Subd. 1e: The Planning Commission is required to review the possible adverse effects of the requested conditional use. Section 1125.01, Subd. 1-q: which states that the Planning Commission shall make findings of fact and recommend such actions or conditions relating to the request as it deems necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of the Zoning Code and forward such findings to the City Council. Discussion: Dell -Comm is proposing to construct a 150 -foot tall cell tower on their property. Telecommunication towers are allowed in all zoning districts, but the heights permitted vary by the property zoning. Industrial districts allow for the tallest towers at 150 feet. The proposed tower would be located on the southeast corner of their property in a wooded, unused area. Dell -Comm would own the tower and use it for empoyee training and certification purposes, along with leasing antenna space to other cellular phone companies. CU2014-001 Staff Report September 17, 2014 Page 2 The CUP will remain in effect indefinitely so long as there are no changes to the operation and there have been no problems or reasons, which would warrant the City Council to re-examine the CUP. CUP Considerations: Chapter 1125 of the Zoning Code requires that the Planning Commission review and address any potential adverse effects which include, but are not limited to, relationship with the Comprehensive Plan, geographical area involved, potential depreciation, the character of the surrounding area and the demonstrated need for such a use. Each of these potential adverse effects is addressed below. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. Dell-Comm's property is zoned 1-1, Industrial and is surrounded by other industrial businesses and the TownsEdge Manufactured Home Park on the north side. If the requested conditional use permit were approved, this CUP would be in line with the Comp Plan "Light Industrial" land use designation for this property. The Location and Character of the Surrounding Area. Dell -Comm is located on Mustang Circle in the industrial area of the City. The tower would be located in the southeast corner of their property, in an unused, heavily wooded area. Access to the cell tower would currently only be through Dell-Comm's parking lot. They will make a 12 -foot wide gravel access drive from their parking lot, along the east side of the property going south to the tower. The site plan shows a 20 -foot wide future gravel access road leading to Mustang Circle, but there are no plans to construct this road at this time. The residential manufactured home park on the north side of 4860 Mustang Circle is approximately 500 feet from where the tower will be located. There is a wooded border with tall, mature trees along the property line between the manufactured home park and the industrial properties on Mustang Drive and Mustang Circle. The tower itself will be setback 55 feet from the east and south property lines. The tower and the ground equipment are required to be surrounded by an eight foot (8) fence for security and screening. This fenced area will have approximately 40 -foot setbacks from the east and south property lines. The fence and ground equipment will be approximately 250 feet from the street and won't be visible due to the woods. The proposed cell tower should not be out of place in this primarily industrial area. Depreciation. Since the surrounding area is primarily industrial, the proposed antenna tower should result in little, adverse effect upon the surrounding area. There is a residential neighborhood on the north side of Dell-Comm's property, but due to their office building and the woods, the tower should not be very noticeable to these residents. The Demonstrated Need for Such a Use. Cell phones have become an item that most people now have, and the industry continues to expand. Due to this growth, communication companies must continue to offer better and larger coverage areas. This part of the City is in need of improved cell service, and since telecommunications is Dell-Comm's industry, they can also use the tower for training their employees in addition to providing a tower for other cell companies to install their antennas. CU2014-001 Staff Report September 17, 2014 Page 3 Summary: All City zoning and code issues are satisfied with this request. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has reviewed the coordinates, structure type and height and determined that this structure does not need to be registered with them, and there are also no Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements for this tower. Recommendations: Review the plans and discuss the proposed cell tower. Staff review revealed no deficiencies at this time and thus Resolution 1013-14 recommending approval of the conditional use permit has been drafted for your action if the Commission so desires. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial View 3. Letter from Applicant 4. Photos of 4860 Mustang Circle 5. Photos of lattice -style tower and ground equipment 6. Site plan 7. Survey 8. Resolution 1013-14 Zoning Map g / 9 4� . lF , ® 1- ir = A��I IIIIMIIIIIWI- II�I�III III . ..ll Letter from Applicant FAC Holdings, LLC. August 15, 2014 Heidi Heller Planning Associate City of Mounds View 2401 County Road 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Ms. Heller: Please accept this request from FAC Holdings, LLC. to build a 150 ft. cell tower on its property at 4860 Mustang Circle, Mounds View, MN, 55112. The purpose of this request is to help improve cell coverage within the SW corner of Mounds View. We plan to lease space on this tower to multiple cell carriers to help improve their cell coverage in this area. Additionally, we plan to use this tower for purposes of training, certification and recertification on tower fundamentals and safe tower climbing. If you have any questions and/or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, 7�XX ?James D. Fr Is Chief Manager, FAC Holdings, LLC. JDF:kjf Enclosures: FAC Holdings, LLC. Check 1093 Sheet No. A] Sheet No. AS 1 ��, y �.P c�,� 1 . a.a., 4 Y { I!I 61116 Fill I � IIR q y , IIIlrllllllllllll Examples of what the proposed lattice -style tower and ground equipment would look like Site Plan 3A1809NV15nW i I i r— — Tower fenced .: u area 7_. $ `•- 71 `i'` 311.1 J 1 lk LF 4 ��~ ',�� � �•����� � 181 ----- -- --- Dell -Comm —, Access ............ Parking lot drive to , tower c Dell -Comm office •`b buiding 1 j.'. Survey — southeast corner of 4860 Mustang and adjacent properties GRAVEL vav .o 9�rn'r 1 1 I ( I I I ti 1 12 L e�1Y 51, , I0 v.x 1 evax I I ee].] eBSO ` • r •� q S O /• �%%����- •�I306a O— IW]I NYOI ( U e.v 481 ev9 ] qqpp 2O�T.1% 93r��r_ S EAST 4crg�'? ;91e rM.° PROPOSED Yi ,� irxxu3 ess LANG SPACE 9JJ sq. ft ava' y ZSED aeaa� / TOWER iaao✓`W .en] LOCA 77ON a09>.l USED U77LITY�LOi1JC0r T OF WAY I6 sq. 32• / �/=x90.9 \ �(fn124 � a-xcm /�1� ee''•��O�xf�` I f�B>.3 ( ' >•eox •�9] �`8"¢Y �]��X � _I 4%e O �e J..)f /II (r°B°B e9eA '"' I.... I .V I..'3 t eBao � � 9evaa �r y an.e 9998 0 •evae\ 2 tiJ� I_ I aea.v m� eBae � Z I .SOA 3.0 $'i..0 \ e9z< v a l .evae 0 9 F001 CHAPI LINK FENCE 0 aJ .e900 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1013-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FAC HOLDINGS, LLC TO CONSTRUCT A 150 -FOOT TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER AT 4860 MUSTANG CIRCLE; PLANNING CASE NO CU2014-001 WHEREAS, FAC Holdings, LLC, has applied for a conditional use permit to construct a 150 -foot telecommunications tower on their property; and, WHEREAS, the subject property, located at 4860 Mustang Circle, is zoned 1-1, Industrial, and is legally described as follows: Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, Mounds View Industrial Park No. 3, Ramsey County, Minnesota PIN: 17-30-23-13-0011 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Zoning Code conditionally allows telecommunication towers and antennae up to 150 feet in height in Industrial zoning districts; and, WHEREAS, the proposed telecommunications tower is not required to be registered with the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) or Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: a. Planning Application b. Aerial view showing proposed location C. Zoning Map d. Photographic documentation e. Staff Report NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact related to the conditional use permit request: 1. The proposed telecommunications tower meets the requirements as outlined in Chapter 1124 of the Zoning Code. 2. The request is consistent with the Mounds View Comprehensive Plan in that a cell tower is consistent with the Light Industrial land use designation for this area. Re,SOIL0017 9093-14 Page 2 3. The proposed telecommunications tower would not be out of place given the industrial character of the surrounding area involved. 4. The proposed telecommunications tower would not depreciate the neighboring properties. 5. The applicant has sufficiently demonstrated that a need exists for expanded telecommunications coverage in the Mounds View area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the conditional use permit for the telecommunications tower, with conditions as follows: 1. Access to the equipment shall be protected by a secure 8 -foot chain link fence. 2. No advertising signage will be allowed attached to the pole or fencing. 3. The tower shall not exceed 150 feet in height or have any lighting. 4. The Conditional Use Permit (CUP) shall become null and void if the work for which the CUP was granted is not completed within one year from the date of approval unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the Planning Commission. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Conditional Use Permit shall have no expiration date and shall remain in force so long as the conditions agreed upon herein are observed. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 17th day of September 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) > MOUNDS VIEW City of Mounds View Staff Report Item No: 5B Meeting Date: September 17 2014 Type of Business: Public Hearing To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing - Consideration of Variance Request to allow for a Reduced Rear Yard Setback at 2624 Ardan Avenue; Planning Case VR2014-007 Introduction: The property owners, Gerald and Melanie Lind, are requesting a variance to permit a porch addition to their house at 2624 Ardan Avenue to encroach twelve feet into the required 30 - foot rear yard setback. The Linds want to build a 14'x 16' porch on the back of their house where the existing deck is. Discussion: The Lind's house is a rambler style built in 1969 on a 0.25 acre shallow lot that is only 89.5 feet deep. The applicant's home was placed on the lot with the required minimum 30 foot front setback. Because of how shallow the lot is, the backyard setback is only 32 feet (City Code requires a 30 foot rear setback). Because of how their lot was split, the applicant's property has a much smaller backyard than most of the homes on the block. The Lind's like their neighborhood, but want to expanding their existing home with a new porch. They currently have a large deck on the rear of the house and want to convert half of the deck to a 3 -season porch. The City Code allows decks to have a 5 foot setback, so the deck is code compliant with its 18 foot setback. But when you have a covered, enclosed space, it is considered living space and must meet the 30 foot rear yard setback requirement. The applicant's backyard is adjacent to the rear neighbor's shed and they have a privacy fence. Variance Criteria Review: The Zoning Code states that the Planning Commission may issue a variance to provide relief to the landowner in those cases where the Code imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the property owner's land. This is true for all variance requests. State statutes require that the governing body review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. These criteria are set forth in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. A variance may be granted only in the event that a// of the following circumstances exist: Planning Carse VR2014-007 September 17, 2014 SlaffReport Page 2 a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of these regulations. The zoning code requires minimum structure setbacks for aesthetics and to provide separation and some sense of privacy between neighbors. Enclosing the deck will provide more separation and privacy for the owners and the neighbors than the current open deck. b. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not specify setback criteria, but it does support improvements to properties. C. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Title or the City Code. The property currently has a deck on the back of the home that has an 18 foot setback from the rear property line. By changing the deck into a covered porch, it now must have a 30 -foot setback. Due to the shallow depth of the lot, no living space additions would meet the 30 setback. d. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactmentof this Title has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. This property was subdivided in such a way that created a shallow lot. The applicant's purchased the property as -is and did not cause the unique circumstance. e. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The new porch will have no effect on the look of the property from the street, and would only be visible to the immediate neighbors. A privacy fence surrounds the backyard. f. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The 12 -foot variance is the minimum variance needed since that is what the Zoning Code requires for living space setback. g. The Planning Commission may impose such conditions upon the premises benefited by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established by this Title or to reduce or minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Staff has no suggestions for conditions for the variance request. The Planning Commission may add conditions as they see applicable. Planning Case VR2014-007 September 17, 2014 Siaff Report Page 3 Public Hearing: As with any requested variance, this application requires a public hearing. Staff mailed notices to all property owners within 350 feet of the applicant's property and a notice was published in the Sun Focus newspaper on Friday, September 5, 2014. Staff has not received any comments or questions as of September 12, 2014. Recommendation: After holding the public hearing and taking testimony from staff, the applicant and affected neighbors, the Commission may take one of the following actions related to the request: 1. Approve the variance as requested. Resolution 1014-14 is attached for action if the Commission so chooses. 2. Deny the requested variance. The Commission should direct staff to draft a resolution of denial with findings appropriate to support the denial. 3. Table the request. If additional information is needed before a decision can be rendered or if more discussion is needed, the Commission can simply move to table the request until such information has been provided. Respectfully Submitted By Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Photo 3. Proposed Site Plans 4. Photographic Documentation 5. Resolution 1014-14 ZONING MAP tFNI wva 8340 - — 8330 8357 l 8340 8325 8360 8351 834 8331 8330 8335 _ 8346 t4 _ _ 8335 - -� 8325 8320 8321 8343 8342 8325 8312 8315 8320 $315 - -6318 8323 _ 8320 8315 8340 54 _ - - 8300 8305 -I 8330 8375 8332 8315 __ 8300 1303 B310 wo 8305_ 8310 8321 _ __ __ 8307 SO 8353 8322 8306 8290 8285 8290 8291 8290 8285 8290 8295 8310 w A"RDAN( 8325 8300 6285 _ 8250 8287 8280 j 8281 8280 8273 8280 00 8273 5 PARK \\ - -- - = 8275 6270 8281 8270 In 8271 827D 8265 -- 0 8300 GROVELAN❑ - - -- 8260 3 82s7 -- 8265 8260 ® 8273 _ 826(7 8261 __t 8200 �( - w -- PARK - - -- - - 8250 8255 8250 w 8255 8280 0255 8250 8267 8250 8251_ - -_ - - -- 8283 8260 LJ m m n rn 18240 8287_ 8240 n m m 6242 n O 6271 ,-- r. N N. N v' 8231 m B N N N 8250 J -- ARDAt4 N N <V N'8230 6255 n - 6247 AVE -- n ��`yry m o �' a 8220 /� ' N ip` m umi E n N g2 8239 4' lV N N I tmv At7lding 8205 N N N N N N _— IB 8210 6211 Savior Church - - 8225 8227 T 818 8193 8224 _ n,m i8 620$ N N N 20 8180 6212 8217 T; DR .. -t5 - 6208 8205 i0 n N . T620B a m m no 6175 0'.� ^^ 81 fi0 8171 6200 _ 12 0 8203 E171-6-5 W N FD �18 jO (m PORr200 nN N N NNS14 8155 � d� rJ� $ 8150 6165 � 8150 LWV "`' n oj8142 8145 4�0 �i8145 I 8740 }B c7 m m o ��_n n�N8135 --.Bi\�S ` 81408141 8136 9 \ 8132 32 6127 812518130 813 -_,� n m !8111 'S 9m. o S'N}6 ry ry' N �N N N N N N N N N�812 121N N N NN N- D M1 v 8 099 N 8085N n 8066 8085081 60 8075 B 0 _ a0 so 013j, 8070 8071 8066 8071 8065 8072 8072 60 8664 X71 8071 N 8075 806 8059 8050 8055 8060 8065 _ 8050 6060 - 40 W48 8046 8045 b040 804.2 8045 8052 6051 BD44 8045 8046 6041 8036 --._ 1 8039 ---- - - 8025 8032 8033 6040 8035 8032 8031 8038 8035 20 8025 - 8026 8015 802-j 0025 8018 8011 8000 8021 8022 6019 803b 8016 e0ii 8000 8405 8016 80pg 600fi 8011 8]�a 8001 8010 - -- 8C05 - 7961 7990 0 7981 7990 O 7989 7 7993 7990 _ 7990 7985 ` BOOA �, _._ __ 7977 79 7975 I 7970 7979- -- 7980 7969 _ 7980 7979 _ 7G 7985 7970 -. _ 7960 7959 7970 79G5 7960 7961 7864 7975 m n ! 7fl60 7965 _ w 79M19 7954 7959 7966 7969 7950 7951 7954 m 795 7955 7456 _ _ - - - — 7955 N - -- 7940 7945 7946 7927 7934 7933 7950 ------ - - -- - 7940 HILLVIEW 7930 Ma 7930 7917 7945 7932 _ _ - 7901 PARK O1j )On 7900 7900 7901 N N 79009011 m I in N N N79007901 - HILLVIEW ROAD 2 m ry1�� n 788 O Fn 7891 N I N 7860 76951 n N 7890 7885_ N N 7864 86Nn N " Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential !J_ . RMORWmak l7 � S - -.low, a r 0 Site Plan for 2624 Ardan Avenue Porch Addition am M 6 N 01 t�Ci m d u mE5 vQv ,d c N i� N ,bZ ££ Z£ m m D m N 'x w 0 co 0 a j v � w 0 CO) d IY 1' O Z <V r M Photos of 2624 Ardan Avenue y� porch wouldreplaceM lfk,' } t.IlM1 1,Ik with railings y W $ � t MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1014-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW AN EIGHTEEN -FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK AT 2624 ARDAN AVENUE; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE VR2014-007 WHEREAS, property owners, Gerald and Melanie Lind, have applied for a variance to allow a house addition to encroach twelve feet into the required 30 foot rear yard setback at 2624 Ardan Avenue; and, WHEREAS, 2624 Ardan Avenue is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and legally described as follows: E 120 FT of W 1859 FT OF N 119 5/10 FT S 1012 5/10 FT OF NE % (subject to Rds) in Section 6, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota PIN: 06-30-23-14-0025 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Proposed Site and Addition Plans 2. Zoning Map 3. Aerial Views 4. Photographic Documentation 5. Staff Report WHEREAS, the purpose of the variance provision in the Zoning Code is to give relief to property owners when the strict enforcement of the zoning code requirements imposes a hardship thereby restricting the improvement of property due to practical difficulties brought about by unique or extraordinary features of the physical property that are beyond the property owner's control; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly -noticed public hearing regarding this request on September 17, 2014; and, WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria that must be satisfied in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient practical difficulty with regard to the property located at 2624 Ardan Avenue, and makes the following findings of fact related to its decision: Resolution 101414 Page 2 1. The general intent of the Zoning Code regarding building setbacks is to give some sense of privacy and separation for the property owners and their neighbors. The proposed addition would allow for more privacy than the existing open deck. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the applicants are improving the property. 3. The applicants are requesting this variance because their limited rear yard depth will not allow any living space additions. 4. The unique feature of this property is that it is a small, shallow lot with very limited backyard space. The property does not even meet the current lot size square footage requirements. 5. A deck has existed on the rear of the home for more than 20 years and the enclosed porch will be in the same location. The addition will not change the existing neighborhood character or the look of the front of the property. 6. The 12 -foot variance is the minimum variance required to alleviate the applicant's practical difficulty since the Zoning Code requires a minimum 30 foot rear yard setback. 7. The Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the premises as may be necessary to comply with city standards and to minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission, based upon the above findings, approves the variance request of Gerald and Melanie Lind, to allow a living space addition to have an 18 -foot rear setback at 2624 Ardan Avenue subject to the following: If within one year after granting the variance, the work as permitted by the variance has not been completed, then such variance shall be come null and void unless an extension of time has been requested by the applicant and granted by the Planning Commission. Such extension shall be requested by the applicant in writing, and submitted to the City at least 30 days before the expiration of the original variance. Adopted this 17th day of September, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chairperson ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) MOUNDS VIEW City of Mounds View Staff Report Item No: 5C Meeting Date: September 17 2014 Type of Business: Planning Case To Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat for the Subdivision of three parcels owned by Multi -Tech Systems at 2205 Woodale Drive; Planning Case MA2014-003 Introduction: Multi -Tech Systems, Inc. has submitted an application for a major subdivision of their three parcels at 2205 Woodale Drive. The proposed subdivision would be creating three different lots from the existing three lots in order to sell the west 6.5 acres to Build to Suit, Inc. who will be constructing a new building for BioLife Plasma Services. Discussion: Multi -Tech Systems, Inc. currently owns three parcels that total 17 -acres. One parcel contains their building and part of the parking lot, another has a stormwater pond, and the third has the remainder of their parking lot and about six acres of vacant land. All three properties are zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development. The proposed subdivision is essentially just shifting lot lines within the same 17 acres. The new lot lines would put Multi-Tech's building, parking lot and stormwater pond together onto one parcel, then create two new lots where the vacant land is: the south lot is for the new BioLife building, and the other lot would remain vacant until sold for further development. Build to Suit, the developer of the BioLife building, is purchasing Lot 1 and Outlot A. Major Subdivision: Local Water Management Plan: Also known as the City's Surface Water Management Plan, this planning document guides the City in regards to drainage and stormwater management. The project area is located in the BPN-4 sub -watershed. The minimum recommended building elevation for the BPN-4 sub -watershed is set at 901.9 feet. The actual construction elevations are confirmed by City Staff with each permit for new construction. Easements: The City's Subdivision Code requires that plats dedicate perimeter drainage and utility easements for each lot in the subdivision; ten feet wide in the front and rear, and five feet wide on the sides. This plat does dedicate the necessary perimeter easements. There is also an additional drainage and utility easement in the southeast corner of Lot 1 for the infiltration basin that is required by Rice Creek Watershed District. Streets & Traffic: Lot 1 will have right -in -only access from County Road 10, access through Multi-Tech's parking lot to Woodale Drive, and access to County Road H2 on a driveway that will be shared with Outlot A. All streets are adequate to handle the amount of added traffic that the additional development would create. Since BioLife is currently located in the city, their traffic is already on County Road 10 and Woodale, and most of it will likely remain there. Pl nnin< Case NIA? -01/I--003 Page 2 Park Dedication Requirements: The Subdivision Code indicates that any subdivision of land is subject to a park dedication fee. The dedication imposed is intended to mitigate public costs to the parks system associated with land development. The fee shall be reasonable and based on the extent of the development. For major subdivisions, the park dedication fee is typically equal to 10% of the market value of the land. To establish the market value, staff uses Ramsey County assessed values as the basis for dedication computation. 2013 is the most recent year that Ramsey County has available for market values. The 2013 Ramsey County determined land market value for the area that is being purchased is $4.49 per square foot. The development area is 257,074 square feet x $4.49/sq. foot = $1,154,262 land value. The dedication amount then would be 10% of the determined land value which would equal $115,426. Utilities: All utilities on the site must be installed underground, per Section 1203.10. Water and sanitary sewer connections are available and will be installed during construction of the BioLife building. Vegetation: The 17 acre site contains a large office/manufacturing building, a large asphalt parking lot, a stormwater pond and 6.5 acres of vacant land with some trees, of which little to none are valuable trees. 3.69 acres of the vacant land will be developed right away. The landscaping plan for the new BioLife building is being reviewed by the City's consultant. Wetlands: The National Wetlands Inventory Map and the City's official Wetland Zoning Map identify no wetlands within the property boundary. The applicant has received their conditional approval from Rice Creek Watershed District. Recommendation: Review the plans and discuss the proposed preliminary plat. Staff review revealed no deficiencies at this time and thus Resolution 1015-14 recommending approval of the preliminary plat has been drafted for your action if the Commission so desires. Respectfully Submitted By, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial View 3. Preliminary Plat 4. Resolution 1015-14 ) Zoning Map N Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential Aerial View Red lines = new parcel lines (pink lines are existing parcel lines) Yellow arrows = where new access drives will be Preliminary Plat !•w � �)� � .���! :§ 4 &s MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1015-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK 3RD ADDITION; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. MA2014-003 WHEREAS, Multi -Tech Systems has requested approval of a preliminary plat for the major subdivision of their three parcels; and, WHEREAS, the above-described lands are zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development, and legally -described as: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying Northeasterly of the Northerly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway No. 10, and the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, except that part lying Southwesterly of the Northerly right-of-way line of U. S. Highway 10, all in Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the United States Government Survey thereof. PIN's 08-30-23-42-0001 and 08-30-23-42-0012 Lot 2, Block 1, Mounds View Business Park 2nd Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota PIN 08-30-23-42-0011 WHEREAS, Multi -Tech Systems has submitted a Preliminary Plat for the major subdivision which creates 3 different parcels; and, WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision is not within a designated wetland area; and, WHEREAS, the community development and public works staff have reviewed the preliminary plat and finds that it satisfies the minimum subdivision requirements as articulated in Titles 1100 and 1200 of the Mounds View Municipal Code and complies with county platting requirements; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 1204.04, Subd. 4, the subdivision is subject to a park dedication fee to be determined by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Staff Report 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Zoning Map 4. Aerial View 5. Comprehensive Plan Existing and Future Land Use Maps Resolution '1015-14 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat for the Mounds View Business Park 3`d Addition, submitted by Multi -Tech Systems, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall pay a park dedication fee of $115,426, or as determined by the City Council. 2. The applicant shall satisfy all requirements made by the City Attorney as stated in the plat opinion. 3. The applicant shall pay all City costs, including those of the City Attorney. 4. The applicant shall apply for Final Plat approval no later than 6 months after the date of approval of the preliminary plat, or the Preliminary Plat approval will become null and void. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 17th day of September, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) PRELIMINARY PLAT: MOUNDS VIEW 1 I — _ — _ -_ — — — — — T — ___ � ham` �•zeu8 ssu .. _ 'County Road H2 I f II I I 1 I I, tl la Oudot A u I q I •�^. p Iry a,i I E I. rye 8 d I I � ry I I'fl I rr, I ��r I I Is Ii 11 I I II ' + •g IM1 I. I Block', 1 Lott I I „ I, i, I II I �< 1 ,r / 1 � \ 1 / \ R y 0� �60 W. scau: m rsex s,. _-1 1V2 ILI es"I o -i II—LIT BUS/NESS PARK 3RD ADDITION Lot 2 1 a pasFpa ( ¢ a Jy°Efr6 i / i,,NEb5 27" / g X,L Zl1 I P✓ / PRELIMINARY PIAT GENERAL MOTES \� sVRVEYOR: OecXXI / lou As gssotlales, SR, Ms ISO XSyslemz lrc. /72OT m,l FSO. 11— e:r,lN 55M2 Lane, M," 39 wMtlab Xm MapleG=, MN 653 7¢]-4265585 )131653 LE0.0. PTIOm 7 Nel.s." s, Me tk lllreOy llB6bl waY m-1 XS. ftl-, Na. TO, a,R lM Na Jhn 9Oualelbe6l lue NaR—. GuaRe, of Ne 6a. -I m-M,r,'-1 Wi W Iy1nI 5oNNzesiee!/ -Ne "'I es"s"'y lure ` V.S uOu-1 tet. us allN Sez4on q "—`T1 28, Renee 2J. Ramsey -mll lemewla, aero Jmg to ero eeAetl SYles fmverlvneM Sury ¢y lle real Zrose, R.",. Me. avl Properly Te,aTh,r,utu In11, eb4t 1, Ma unJz Yiew Ouslners PaM3M gtltlllion, Ra msey founly, Mlnneula. Tmrens R,Tz TeerereCerlllrcafe 11a.16735 gTE OF Pq TION X14. 05NEXMARK: Tens r. tle6yXlrrrw ,ywwkingalNi am9 IIO6 w.vaaA alv. en ua mev: earrodM—SOS Fk-TS— zo e11Pu0) X ANFds: Inl11— 16O,Hosaft o: J6s asrca 2 alga= I ea= 5ait or ONblqM0'RBI5252 <O 1 8N1 or O71A111 0,1A-1 IRS M."Nea= 5s 11 el if lB gvea eu O.ONC RRemmsnoN: rola pole, la wIMI e. In mne x 1— M s—FRIa 16e eNSJe me 12b annual amnee MOJplaln) pa 11", lnaun Me Rale ." Commun Ay Panel IS,. P19CW15c. Offv,t a Ale of June 4, 2010. Multi -Tech Systems, Inc. Mounds New, Mmuescl6 MultiTechSystems, INe. 205 WuLle ESKR M—R,ts V,,,,, MN 55112 ASSOCIATES IFH Preliminary Plat 0 14-237 77 IT Sheet 1 of 1 SURVEY LEGEND wsx @® N I: " -- 1. O t,, N+r —RmS, =EIMMI m mnaro RS R—V V 11 ~o Ic w 'Rem IF —RITIEST UuTus X . M u6M Fee - me,, F,ITFO R6 Is —S SILI r sun ! �IO 11 e�ie : fJRufn Sommul iR Ru. ((ORO) SOOF£AOus TFE, O uclrt Rlfimmuus TREE ISIT Lot 2 1 a pasFpa ( ¢ a Jy°Efr6 i / i,,NEb5 27" / g X,L Zl1 I P✓ / PRELIMINARY PIAT GENERAL MOTES \� sVRVEYOR: OecXXI / lou As gssotlales, SR, Ms ISO XSyslemz lrc. /72OT m,l FSO. 11— e:r,lN 55M2 Lane, M," 39 wMtlab Xm MapleG=, MN 653 7¢]-4265585 )131653 LE0.0. PTIOm 7 Nel.s." s, Me tk lllreOy llB6bl waY m-1 XS. ftl-, Na. TO, a,R lM Na Jhn 9Oualelbe6l lue NaR—. GuaRe, of Ne 6a. -I m-M,r,'-1 Wi W Iy1nI 5oNNzesiee!/ -Ne "'I es"s"'y lure ` V.S uOu-1 tet. us allN Sez4on q "—`T1 28, Renee 2J. Ramsey -mll lemewla, aero Jmg to ero eeAetl SYles fmverlvneM Sury ¢y lle real Zrose, R.",. Me. avl Properly Te,aTh,r,utu In11, eb4t 1, Ma unJz Yiew Ouslners PaM3M gtltlllion, Ra msey founly, Mlnneula. Tmrens R,Tz TeerereCerlllrcafe 11a.16735 gTE OF Pq TION X14. 05NEXMARK: Tens r. tle6yXlrrrw ,ywwkingalNi am9 IIO6 w.vaaA alv. en ua mev: earrodM—SOS Fk-TS— zo e11Pu0) X ANFds: Inl11— 16O,Hosaft o: J6s asrca 2 alga= I ea= 5ait or ONblqM0'RBI5252 <O 1 8N1 or O71A111 0,1A-1 IRS M."Nea= 5s 11 el if lB gvea eu O.ONC RRemmsnoN: rola pole, la wIMI e. In mne x 1— M s—FRIa 16e eNSJe me 12b annual amnee MOJplaln) pa 11", lnaun Me Rale ." Commun Ay Panel IS,. P19CW15c. Offv,t a Ale of June 4, 2010. Multi -Tech Systems, Inc. Mounds New, Mmuescl6 MultiTechSystems, INe. 205 WuLle ESKR M—R,ts V,,,,, MN 55112 ASSOCIATES IFH Preliminary Plat 0 14-237 77 IT Sheet 1 of 1 PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting August 20, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for August 20, 2014. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Birken, Carvelli-Yu, Love, Rundle, Schiltgen, and Stevenson. Absent and Excused: Commissioner Elofson. Also Present: f Index to Minutes Approval of Minutes Planning Associate Heidi Heller. VR2014-006 Consideration of Variance for a Reduced Driveway Setback 3. Approval of Minutes July 2, 2014. Page 1 2 MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Schiltgen/Commissioner Birlcen. To approve the Minutes of the July 2, 2014 regular Planning Commission meeting as slightly amended. Ayes — 6 Nays — 0 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 5. Planning Cases August 20, 2014 Page 2 A. VR2014-006 Consideration of a Variance for a Reduced Driveway Setback Applicant: Corbin Hilgeman Address: 7851 Spring Lake Road Planning Associate Heller indicated the applicant, Corbin Hilgeman, is requesting approval of a variance for a reduced driveway setback on his property at 7851 Spring Lake Road. The applicant recently built a detached garage in the backyard and now wants to extend the existing driveway to connect to the new garage. This extended driveway will run past the house and be closer than five feet to the property line so the applicant has requested a reduced driveway setback variance. Associate Heller reviewed the request in detail with the Commission and recommended approval of a variance for a reduced driveway setback at 7851 Spring Lake Road. Chair Stevenson opened the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. Commissioner Schiltgen questioned what type of surface would be used for the new driveway. Corbin Hilgeman, 7851 Spring Lake Road, reported the new driveway would be colored concrete to match the existing patio. Commissioner Birken asked if the existing tree line would be interrupted. Mr. Hilgeman commented the tree line would not be impacted. Commissioner Carvelli-Yu inquired if Spring Lake Road had been recently replaced. Commissioner Rundle indicated this road was redone approximately 10 years ago. Chair Stevenson questioned if the amount of the variance could be reduced. Mr. Hilgeman responded he could have less than a 10 foot wide driveway if it made the variance approval process easier. He stated that the 10 feet would ensure his cars and the mirrors would fit beside the house. Chair Stevenson was in favor of the driveway being at least one foot from the property line. Commissioner Love thanked Mr. Hilgeman for the well-designed driveway. She questioned how this request differed from a previous variance request that was denied by the Commission. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting August 20, 2014 Page 3 Chair Stevenson explained that the previous request was for a second curb cut and not a driveway setback so the variance requests were different. Further discussion ensued regarding the difference between the two planning cases. Chair Stevenson closed the public hearing at 7:14 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Carvelli-Yu. To approve Resolution 1012-14, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Variance for a Reduced Driveway Setback, and that a one foot minimum setback be maintained at 7851 Spring Lake Road; Planning Case No. VR2014-006. Ayes — 5 Nays — 1 (Love) Motion carried. 6. Other Planning Activity None. 7. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. September 3, 2014 — cancelled due to lack of quorum B. September 17, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. July 16, 2014 The Commission discussed the July 16, 2014 meeting minutes. No changes were made. 9. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. She reported the Council approved the Highway 10 Overlay District. It was noted the final plat for Longview Estates would be reviewed by the Council on August 25th. She explained Apple Tree Dental would be holding a ribbon cutting ceremony on August 27th at 4:30 p.m. and the Commission was invited to attend Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports August 20, 2014 Page 4 Commissioner Love noted the first free library in Mounds View was located on the corner of Hillview and Sunnyside Road. Commissioner Rundle indicated he had one in his neighborhood at the corner of Spring Lake Road and County Road H2. 11. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 7:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. j MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA October 1, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: August 20, 2014 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases A. VR2014-008 Consideration of a Variance to Allow a 6 -foot Fence in Both of the Front Yards of a Corner Lot Applicant: City of Mounds View Address: 2408 Hillview Road (Municipal Well No. 4) 6. Other Planning Activity A. None 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, October 15, 2014 B. Wednesday, November 5, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. September 17, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion ,f _ Item No: 5A MOUNDS MEW Meeting Date: October 1, 2014 Type of Business: Public Hearing City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Consideration of a Variance to Allow a Six -Foot Tall Fence in both of the Front Yards of 2408 Hillview Road (Municipal Well No. 4); Planning Case VR2014-008 Introduction: The applicant, City of Mounds View, is requesting a variance to install a 6 -foot tall chain-link fence around the entire property where the Municipal Well No. 4 is located, which is on the southeast corner of Hillview Road and Edgewood Drive. Since two streets border corner lots, they have two front yards. As such, the City Code requirement for front yard applies to two sides of the property, which means that corner lots to have additional limitations. The Zoning Code indicates that no fence in front of the front line of a building in a residential district may exceed four feet in height. Discussion: According to the Municipal Code, Section 1103.08, Subdivision 3, fences of a height greaterthan 48 inches (4 feet) are not allowed in the front yard of a property without a variance. The Zoning Code also establishes a sight triangle that limits all obstructions within the area at the corner of intersections, measured thirty (30) feet from the point where the property lines meet at the intersection of two streets. The proposed fence would not be located within the sight triangle. Variance Considerations: For the City to approve this variance, as with any variance request, there needs to be demonstrated practical difficulty associated with the property that makes a literal interpretation of the Code overly burdensome or restrictive to a property owner. State statutes require that the governing body (the Planning Commission) review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. The City has set these criteria in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. The Code clearly states that a hardship exists when all of the criteria are met. The individual criteria and a staff comment about each are as follows: a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of these regulations. The property at 2408 Hillview Road is a corner lot, which is not in itself unique; however, the property is the location of a municipal well and the City seeks permission to have a 6 -foot tall fence for the purpose of security for the well and the building to help prevent further vandalism and protect the City's infrastructure. The taller fence would provide the needed security for this property. b. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan supports improvements to properties and protection of the City's infrastructure. 2408 Hillview Road Variance Report October 'i, 2014 Page 2 C. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Title or the City Code. It is not unusual for commercial type uses to have the entire property fenced due to the need for extra security, particularly for City infrastructure. The City needs to put the taller fence in both front yards in order to protect the entire building. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this Title has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. This property has been the location of Municipal Well No. 4 for many years and is unique because of it being the location of a city well. The building on the property contains the well and a water treatment plant. There are tanks of chemicals necessary for the operation of the water system in the building. The City needs to do everything possible to protect the water supply and the surrounding properties. e. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The 6 -foot fence will change the appearance of this property, although since it is a commercial building, it is already a different structure than the rest of the neighborhood. The building has large tanks of chemicals inside, such as chlorine. The safety and security of the City's water supply and the neighborhood, should take precedence over the property's appearance. f. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The two foot variance is the minimum variance needed since the Zoning Code limits front yard fence heights to four feet. g. The Planning Commission may impose such conditions upon the premises benefited by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established by this Title or to reduce or minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Staff does not have any suggested conditions. 2405 Hillview Road Variance Report Octoher 1, 2014 Page 3 Based upon the review of the above criteria, it appears to staff that the requested variance does satisfy the practical difficulty threshold. Public Hearing: As with any requested variance, a public hearing is required. City staff mailed notices to all property owners within 350 feet of 2408 Hillview Road. The neighbor to the west called staff with a question. No other comments have been received as of September 26, 2014. Recommendation: After holding the public hearing and taking testimony from staff, the applicant and any neighbors, the Commission should take one of the following actions: 1. Approve the variance as requested. Resolution 1016-14 is attached for the Commission's approval if they so choose. 2. Deny the requested variance. To move forward with this option, the Commission should direct staff to draft a resolution of denial with findings of fact appropriate to support the denial. 3. Table the request. If the Commission needs more information before making a decision or if more discussion is needed, the Commission can table the request until they are provided such information. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Photo 3. Site Plan 4. Photographic Documentation 5. Resolution 1016-14 ZONING MAP 9841 tft 0e M N a I 8110 SHERWOOD 8085 Co d 0 N N BOB 8081 N It N N N N ROAD N 8071 09 N 8070 8051 M M N N M N Npp 8044 8027 O7 801 8005 Q O 601 7989 7 7988 7971 7968 7953 7948 7931 7947 7930 79 N f ViRgNdMIn N N N 7943 N DIV 7861 78540 10x7 CK 836 S 7847 7840 7845 820 p 7833 7832 7837 81 7815 781 7827 806 7817 BOO 7801 780 778 7749-1-7-7-5-47807 7681 17739 '748 7729 F728 7719 '710 7709 7701 7741 7731 GRWIELD Ru y9 8101 N N N ROAD N N 09 N N 40� M M N N M N Npp N O7 N N Q O NIN) 7 N NI N 7947 7945 79 M f ViRgNdMIn 7943 N 7941 794 ` 7939 rl N N 7937 7936 7935 m 7933 7932 r 7931 a 7929 7928 561 f 7927 7925 7924 N 7923 7921 7920 7919 In— 7917 7914V �i 7913 o 7913 _-__ 7910 X, 7909 GRWIELD Ru o c N N N 'Cl M N M N M M N N M N Npp N I N NIN NIN) N N NI N M C3 0 O M f ViRgNdMIn N N N rl N N m m n N r GRWIELD Ru o c N N N 'Cl M N M N M M N N M N Npp N I N OAKWOOD DR m m n N r m a 5611 561 f 561 S 561 N N N N 561 In— 561 561 tF7 561 0 560 560 580 5606 c°�• Co N N N N N 5601 560 5601 560 0, m n n i56 5562 556 5562 N N i55 9 5556 5557 b 5556 )551 U 5550 5551 = 555 Z O m oa o m a w 3 N N N N N N N _17 N c .�. N N C 1y0 1 0 7715 n ,� � , 552 5526 552 5526 m 10 770 7701 N N N N 5521 5520 5521 5520 CO -2 RD * Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential N N N 'Cl N N I __-� _, ,, i . •r i.%y�.k.0 -.. , i� i ��• T L` i'��a, Municipal Well No. 4 abuilding (west side) x. I AL Edgewood Drive k 1� �r b Vi. /i'1y4 srz f R Op "y, City Code Permitted Fence Location for Corner Lots I 1 1 " NOTES: 1 (See 1 — 3 above) I I I I 1 ' '111-�Front Line of House ..................................... --------------- ...................... Fence Heights: 1 ----- 8'orless 1 ........................ 4' or less Chain Link I Garage House Only chain link fences 4' tall or less are allowed within 30' of a property corner formed by two street right of ways. Front Line of House z Street Frontage 30' 30' MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1016-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR A SIX-FOOT TALL FENCE IN THE NORTH AND WEST FRONT YARDS OF 2408 HILLVIEW ROAD; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE VR2014-008 WHEREAS, the applicant, City of Mounds View, has applied for a variance to allow a six-foot tall fence in the north and west front yards of the property at 2408 Hillview Road; and, WHEREAS, 2408 Hillview Road is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and legally described as follows: E 100 Ft Of W 180 Ft Of N 183 Ft Of Nw 1/4 Of Se 1/4 Of Sw 1/4 (subj To Rd) In Sec 5 Tn 30 Rn 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota 05-30-23-34-0004 WHEREAS, Section 1103.08 of the Mounds View Zoning Code indicates that the maximum height of a fence in a front yard four feet (4'); and, WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to allow a six foot (6') fence in the front yards abutting Hillview Road and Edgewood Drive; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents about this proposal: 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Photo 3. Photographic Documentation 4. Staff Report WHEREAS, the purpose of the variance provision in the Zoning Code is to give relief to property owners when the strict enforcement of the zoning code requirements imposes a hardship thereby restricting the improvement of property due to practical difficulties brought about by unique or extraordinary features of the physical property that are beyond the property owner's control; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on Wednesday, October 1, 2014, about this variance request; and, WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria that must be satisfied in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. Resolution 1016-14 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings related to this request: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient practical difficulty with regard to the property located at 2408 Hillview Road, and makes the following findings of fact related to its decision: 1. The general intent of the Zoning Code regarding limited fence heights in front yards is to not close off the front of the property from the visual openness of the street, but yet still allow a fence for safety and privacy. This property is not a residential use and is City -owned infrastructure that needs full security. 2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the applicant is protecting the City's water supply. 3. The applicant is requesting this variance because the front yard height limitations would preclude having a fence tall enough to provide the necessary security for the water treatment plant and well building. 4. The unique feature of this property is that it is a city -owned property that contains a water treatment plant and one of the City's wells. A 6 -foot tall fence in the front yard will change the look of this property but it is necessary for the security of the building. The fence will not cause visibility problems for traffic since it will not be placed in the 30 -foot sight triangle. 6. The 2 -foot variance is the minimum variance required to alleviate the applicant's practical difficulty since the Zoning Code limits front yard fence heights to four feet. The Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the premises as may be necessary to comply with city standards and to minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission, based upon the above findings, does hereby approve the variance request for a six-foot tall fence in the north and west front yards of 2408 Hillview Road. Adopted this 1st day of October, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting September 17, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for September 17, 2014. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Birken, Carvelli-Yu, Love, Rundle, and Stevenson. Absent and Excused: Commissioners Elofson and Schiltgen. Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller. Index to Minutes Page Approval of Minutes 1 CU2014-001 Consideration of a 150 -foot Cell Tower at 4860 2 Mustang Circle VR2014-007 Consideration of Variance for a Reduced Rear Yard 2 Setback MA2014-003 Consideration of a Major Subdivision — Preliminary Plat 3 3. Approval of Minutes July 16, 2014. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Carvelli-Yu. To approve the Minutes of the July 16, 2014 regular Planning Commission meeting as presented. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting September 17, 2014 Page 2 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. 5. Planning Cases A. CU2014-001 Consideration of a 150 -foot Cell Tower at 4860 Mustang Circle Applicant: FAC Holdings LLC/Dell-Comm Address: 4860 Mustang Circle Planning Associate Heller explained the applicant and property owner, FAC Holdings (Dell - Comm is the business operating here), is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to construct a 150 foot cell tower on their property at 4860 Mustang Circle. Dell -Comm designs, furnishes and installs telecommunications systems, applications and services. Dell -Comm has been in business since 1990 and do infrastructure cabling, fiber optic cabling, outside plant cabling, security solutions and telephone systems. Associate Heller discussed the conditional use permit in detail with the Commission noting the proposed lot was heavily wooded. Staff recommended approval of Resolution 1013-14. Chair Stevenson asked if the tower would be required to have a light. Darrin Wixo, Dell -Comm, explained that under FAA regulations, towers under 200 feet are not required to have a light. Commissioner Love questioned if Dell -Comm had considered using any aesthetics to improve the appearance of the cell tower. Darin stated he may consider this; however, the final determination would be with Dell -Comm as they would be building the tower. Commissioner Birken did not believe a cell tower in this area would be an eyesore due to the number of large trees on the property. Commissioner Rundle agreed. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Love/Commissioner Carvelli-Yu. To approve Resolution 1013-14, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Conditional Use Permit; Planning Case No. CU2014-001. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting September 17, 2014 Page 3 B. V122014-007 Consideration of a Variance for a Reduced Rear Yard Setback Applicant: Gerald & Melanie Lind Address: 2624 Ardan Avenue Planning Associate Heller indicated property owners, Gerald and Melanie Lind, are requesting a variance to permit a porch addition on their house at 2624 Ardan Avenue to encroach twelve feet into the required 30 -foot rear yard setback. The Linds want to build a 14' x 16' porch on the back of their house where the existing deck is. Associate Heller reported the Lind's house is a rambler style built in 1969 on a 0.25 acre shallow lot that is only 89.5 feet deep. The applicant's home was placed on the lot with the required minimum 30 foot front setback. Because of how shallow the lot is, the backyard setback is only 32 feet (City Code requires a 30 foot rear setback). Because of how their lot was split, the applicant's property has a much smaller backyard than most of the homes in the city. Associate Heller indicated the Linds like their neighborhood, but want to expand their existing home with a new porch. They currently have a large deck on the rear of the house and want to convert half of the deck to a 3 -season porch. The City Code allows decks to have a 5 foot setback, so the deck is code compliant with its 18 foot setback. But when you have a covered, enclosed space, it is considered living space and must meet the 30 foot rear yard setback requirement. The applicant's backyard is adjacent to the rear neighbor's shed and they have a privacy fence. Staff reviewed the variance request in detail with the Commission and recommended approval. Chair Stevenson opened the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. Commissioner Carvelli-Yu asked if the existing oak tree would remain in place. Gerry Lind, 2624 Ardan Avenue, indicated the tree would remain in the backyard. Chair Stevenson closed the public hearing at 7:24 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Carvelli-Yu/Commissioner Birken. To approve Resolution 1014-14, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Variance for a Reduced Rear Yard Setback; Planning Case No. VR2014-007. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. C. MA2014-003 Consideration of Major Subdivision — Preliminary Plat Applicant: Multi -Tech Systems Address: 2205 Woodale Drive Planning Associate Heller indicated the parcels at 2205 Woodale Drive. The proposed subdivision would be creating three different lots from the existing three lots in order to sell the Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting September 17, 2014 Page 4 west 6.5 acres to Build to Suit, Inc. who will be constructing a new building for BioLife Plasma Services. Associate Heller stated Multi -Tech Systems, Inc. currently owns three parcels that total 17 -acres. One parcel contains their building and part of the parking lot, another has a stormwater pond, and the third has the remainder of their parking lot and about six acres of vacant land. All three properties are zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development. The proposed subdivision is essentially just shifting lot lines within the same 17 acres. The new lot lines would put Multi-Tech's building, parking lot, and stormwater pond together onto one parcel, then create two new lots where the vacant land is: the south lot is for the new BioLife building, and the other lot would remain vacant until sold for further development. Build to Suit, the developer of the BioLife building, is purchasing Lot 1 and Outlot A. Staff reviewed the Planning Case in further detail and recommended approval of the preliminary plat for Multi -Tech Systems. Chair Stevenson requested further information on the park dedication fee. Planner Heller explained all new developments in the City required park dedication fees. These funds are set aside for park improvements. Commissioner Love asked if Multi -Tech had a comment on the park dedication fee. Del Palacheck, Multi -Tech Systems representative, explained Multi -Tech has been in Mounds View since 1989. He believed the park dedication fee was a large number, but understood the requirements of the City. Commissioner Love appreciated the applicant's well -kept pond along Highway 10. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Love. To approve Resolution 1015- 14, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Preliminary Plat; Planning Case No. MA2014- 003. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 6. Other Planning Activity None. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. October 1, 2014 B. October 15, 2014 Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 8. Review Minutes: September 17, 2014 Page 5 A. August 20, 2014 The Commission discussed the August 20, 2014 meeting minutes. No changes were made. 9. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports None. 11. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver OffSite Secretarial, Inc. ZE I UV !, ) PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA November 19, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: September 17, 2014 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases A. None 6. Other Planning Activity A. Review Planning Commissioner Applications B. Discuss 1-1, Industrial, Zoning District Uses and Proposed Code Amendment 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, December 3, 2014 B. Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. October 1, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion !r Item No: 6A MT 7�T l T j Meeting Date: November 19, 2014 OUNDS {� V � W Type of Business: Other Planning Activity City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Planning Commission Term Expiration and New Applications Review The term of three Planning Commission members — Gary Stevenson, Jessica Birken and Julianne Love - expire at the end of the year. The City advertised the vacancies, with applications due on November 10, 2014. Staff received applications from the three current Commissioners for another term, and two other applications for the Planning Commission were received by the City. The Planning Commission will review the applications at the November 19, 2014 meeting, and the City Council will make the official appointments by the end of the year. Sincerely, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Planning Commission Application from Gary Stevenson 2. Planning Commission Application from Jessica Birken 3. Planning Commission Application from Julianne Love 4. Planning Commission Application from Steven Roste 5. Planning Commission Application from Royal Dahlstrom F � r City of Mounds View 2401 County Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 763-717-4000 Application for Advisory Commissions and Committees Group(s)appliedfor: AV lrlCi4nlbi C_O/VA?ISSIOK Full Name (Please Print): vul hone: 7L 79'1 7336v Address: Z0 `I 7 f� 7�/# h Years at this address:. d- I e MS 0 to Work(Cell Phone: 3 �6 o 3 8 -s (/-e. Years you have lived in Mounds View: 350 E-mail Address: Experience and Qualifications Skills and Interests: Employment, Occupation or Other Relevant Experience: /'-h'klej Memberships, Accomplishments or Other Qualifications: Ae_ r"�"t-/ oD% Iq///-/�I-S CA, - Please stateyour /reason for wanting to serve with this group: Signature: � � Date: 1:>1 3 / 2 c)/ y (Your response to any of the above inquiries may be continued on the back of this form and you may attach other information that you would like the City Council to consider.) The City of Mounds View is committed to the policy that at/ persons shall have access to its programs, facilities and employment withoutregard for race, ethnicity, sex, age orphysical abilities. k'151 -14P01:01 R(ND City of Mounds View 2401 County Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 763-717-4000 Application for Advisory Commissions and Committees Group(s) applied for: Planning Commission Full Name (Please Print): Jessica Birken, In, MNM Work Phone: 612-284-6441 x2 Address: 8391 Pleasant View Drive Years at this address: 10 E-mail Address: iessourban-law-group.com Skills and Interests: Work/Cell Phone: 651-274-3255 Years you have lived in Mounds View: to Experience and Qualifications Licensed attorney practicing in Minnesota. Extensive experience in govemement grant compliance, conservation, nonprofit laws, real estate transactions etc. Interest in land use planning and real estate, mediation and conflict resolution and civic engagement. Hold a masters in nonprofit management from Hamlin University School of Business which shares many courses with the public administration program. Qualified neutral trained in transformative model of mediation. 40+ his cultural competency training. Employment, Occupation or Other Relevant Experience Private practice attorney and consultant for nonprofit organizations or local government entities. See attached resume. Memberships, Accomplishments or Other Qualifications: Licensed attorney. Member of MN Bar Association. Licensed Notary Public. Member of MN Council of Nonprofits. Steward of Mounds View's newest Little Free Library: ) See the attached resume for more information. Please state your reason for wanting to serve with this group: Service on the commission is a great opportunity for civic engagement and service to my community. I'm interested in land use planning and bring something to the table there but I'm also interested in learning from the experience and from fellow citizens, commissioners and city staff. Signature: Date: 10-8-2014 (Your response to ny of the above inquiries may be continued on the back of this form and you may attach other information that you would like the City Council to consider.) The City of Mounds View is committed to the policy that all persons shall have access to its programs, facilities and employment without regard for race, ethnicity, sex, age or physical abilities. JESSICA BIRKEN 8391 Pleasant View Drive, Mounds View, MN 55112.651-274-3255 • iess(d,urban-law-group.com PROFESSIONAL PROFILE • Expert writing skills • Teaching / training / presenting • Project management & administration • Exceptional interpersonal skills • Negotiation / mediation • Organization or process efficiency • Team building / adaptive leadership • Change management / org. development • Critical thinking / decision making • 40+ hours of cultural competency training EDUCATION M.A. Nonprofit Management— Hamlin University School of Business, Saint Paul, MN, 2011 J.D. Law — Magna Cum Laude, Hamlin University School of Law, Saint Paul, MN, 2007 B.A. Sociology — University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN, 2001 PROFESSIONAL URBAN LAW GROUP, PLLC, Saint Louis Park, MN 2013 —present CEO & Managing Partner Attorney and consultant to nonprofit organizations. Support the health and vitality of the nonprofit sector by educating and empowering clients to deliver their mission with confidence and competence. Specializing in: • Grant Compliance & Grant Management • Nonprofit Consulting & Best Practices • Property Tax Exemption • Real Estate Matters • Conservation & Environmental • Org. Development & Change Management PHEASANTS FOREVER, INC, Saint Paul, MN 2010-2013 Grants & Contracts Specialist • Manage a large portfolio of diverse and complex grant Raided projects ($15m annual activity). • Ensure compliance with programmatic standards; GAAP; A-133; A-110; etc. • Handle complex Real Estate matters (purchase, sale, O&M, risk management). • Review, draft, negotiate and resolve contractual matters. • Develop policies and systems to reflect industry best practices. • Maintain positive relationships with both internal and external stakeholders. BIRKEN LAW OFFICE, PLLC, Blaine, MN 2009-2013 Attorney / Owner • Provided professional and legal writing services for other attorneys. STATE OF MINNESOTA, JUDICIAL BRANCH, 101h DISTRICT, Pine City, MN 2007 —2009 Judicial Law Clerk, Honorable Krista K. Martin • Performed extensive legal research & writing and drafted judicial opinions for all case types. • Interacted extensively with various stakeholder groups. • Exhibited integrity, tactfulness, neutrality, confidentiality and strictly observed ethical rules. LICENSES - Licensed Attorney - Licensed Notary Public a City of Mounds View 2401 County Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 763-717-4000 Application for Advisory Commissions and Committees Group(s) applied for: Full Name (Please Print) VOW m';0- I; ar) ne, F. Lova Work Phone: 1 t L Work/Cell Phone: `� (Pq o �t �l Address: 7 `j (� �l t v> y� vi�iGQ.e Y) R r� v Years at this address: 3tJ Years you have lived in Mounds View: I Kp E-mail Address: Experience and Qualifications Skills and Interests: 9 �vlrlmIc-vet inCiltUen' f ) c LSD �&p b n u. 1� > Ll,� �l ` (��C r wu �l y�,eQ f wYvU Employment, ccupatio r Other Relevant Experience: I CVVL� v�o� 9-Y)WV4C_SP. a-)�i Pv'I U Memberships, Accomplishmentsor Other Qualifications: lJ (AI`•O C�U�.r� 19'11�'ri2��t'�-�.e ��L�D.Gi,Ltill�I^� �'Ll'QC�,-.O�>�1.� `I%.c UUIQIO,/i_0 Please state your reason for wanting to serve with this group: O 1_6 0A � U Date: % -1 1- e5-)-, - 0 I 1-1. (Your response to any of the above inquiries may be continued on the back of this form and you may attach other information that you would like the City Council to consider.) The City of Mounds View is committed to the policy that all persons shall have access to its programs, facilities and employment without regard for race, ethnicity, sex, age or physical abilities. City of Mounds View 2401 County Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 763-717-4000 Application for Advisory Commissions and Committees Group(s) applied for: C l&PL-4 CewiMiSS%av,ghQ- N 5„ ASO , Full Name (Please Print): 5}P—�l e -A �. 7 mS1 � Work Phone: I Worl Cell Phon • 65I a1- -7-- 1So2`1 . Address: L.o,tia. L I,.¢. N(n,w,14gmmt.1 sstiz 0 Years at this address: t.6 Years you have lived in Mounds View: i S" E-mail Address: aorto Experience and Qualifications Skills and Interests: Employment, Occupation or Other Relevant Experience: GivTjl(;n,1i1w�A.wAK�� �w�iheet— Memberships, Accomplishments or Other Qualifications: I MN 6-'!' 41 eF Pro lx sS, wl EL �SusdS. 'J cr K�Golt ort eo,M v,iYex AyAex,IA ✓. �ci• a� Givi( �i��+P.t�i� Please state your reason for wanting to serve with this group: n Z. WOU-4 }'6- a-0 4elj' µomv�.1S Vi Co.S -AAA ,tail,.y 6a�ahCC a"s rta�ure w.d dua(nPr+*Kf as +ael( a5 fniro�}ace Ser.K Aew iden5 di mar be (re�ne�riai� Signature: Date:. id 1711t( (Your response to any of the above Inquiries may be continued on the back of this form and you may attach other information that you would like the City Council to consider.) The City of Mounds View is committed to the policy that all persons shall have access to Its programs, facilities and employment without regard for race, ethniclty, sex, age or physlcal abilities. City of Mounds View 2401 County Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 763-717-4000 Application for Advisory Commissions and Committees Group(s) applied for: > QC \) 1t\tk � 2 -ed �taw(� I Jg� cA oc lS Full Name (Please Print): leicwl- Work Phone: U awl 53clI I Work/Cell Phone: Borne Address: �j3�0 ala cc�� Qne'A Years at this address: Years you have lived in Mounds View: $ E-mail Address: My-otwti Q W60a • Coles - 13���- Experience and Qualifications to H�ctrS.. Skills and Interests: Employment, Occupation or Other Relevant Experience: S-ce- A44A6KK-4'14 Memberships, Accomplishments or Other Qualifications: se . P -14 i Please state your reason for wanting to serve with this group: Iles is tyu-�- 60"'t- NL'W a -d -}o V\"V, o-� to W4."- CVtVj0+9X- Signature: � � ___.... pate: a a 17 (Your response to any of the above inquiries may be continued on the back of this form and you may attach other information that you would like the City Council to consider.) The City of Mounds View is committed to the policy that all persons shall have access to its programs, facilities and employment without regard for race, ethntrlty, sex, age or physical abilities. i`..-13-'I1ia^'I:O; R C V 0 Royal L. Dahlstrom 8330 Eastwood Road Mounds View Mn. 551112 612-251-8411 dahlstromi@yahoo.com EXECUTIVE CHEF Award-winning executive chef with 26 years of culinary experience known for delivering high-quality, creative menus while contributing to revenue growth. Superior leadership, communication, mentoring and team building skills to effectively lead fine dining operation. EXPERTISE • High -Volume Operations • Profit Enhancement • Budgeting & P&I, Management • Systems Automation + Creative Menu Development • Inventoryi Napa Valley Grille/Tavistock Restaurants —Bloomington, MN Seasonal, rustic, wine country cuisine restaurant with over $3.4 million in gross annual sales. Executive Chef, March 2004 — June 2006 • Increased sales by 4.7% over previous year • Created and developed Napa cuisine with reviews in Mpls. St. Paul Magazine and Minneapolis Star Tribune • Maintained labor force with turnover of less than 5% • Seasonal menu and recipe development • Worked in partnership with General Manager for independent store economics Awards - 4 Best Service 2006 City Pages 4 Best Restaurant Near an Airport 2006, Zagat e Best Business Lunch, MN Meeting & Event Planner 4 Best Wine List, 1993 -Present, Wine Spectator "You are a man for all Dahlstromi, LLC —Minneapolis, MN seasons and the Twin Chef -driven company specializing in cooking classes, private dinnerparties, wine dinners, Cities premier chef:.. " team building events and restaurant consulting. Owner, February 2003 —Present James R. Olson Portofino — Wayzata, MN "What a difference a chef High volume, lakeside restaurant specializing in Italian cuisine with over $4.0 million in makes... a turnaround is gross annual sales. on its way. " Executive Chef, February 2003 —November 2003 • Revamped menu to bring it back to its conception of being true to its name Rick Nelson • Sold -out weekly wine tastings and monthly wine dinners Star Tribune • Reformatted inventory control and ordering process • Supervised multiple shifts of 5-90 employees • Received first favorable review (Minneapolis Star Tribune) La Toscana Iiistorante — Minneapolis, MN "La Toscana, which is Italian ristorante with a warm, neighborhood feel the Twin Cities most Executive Chef, April 1998 — January 2003 Italian Restaurant.,. " • Opening chef of a new restaurant/concept • Created and developed authentic Tuscan menu Mpls. St Paul Magazine • Established working relationship with local farmers for fresh and organic product • Demonstrated thorough knowledge of food and wine pairings in monthly wine dinners • Developed student internship program with local and national culinary schools Awards: 4 Best Italian Restaurant, Mpls.-St. Paul Magazine, 2001 4 Best Wine List, Wine Spectator, 2001 4 Best Top -10 New Restaurant, City Pages 1999 4 Hot New Place on the Block, Zagat, 1999 4 One of Twin Cities Best Kitchen Table, Twin Cities Taste 2001 California Caf6 — Bloomington, MN Sous Chef, March 1997 — April 1998 Awards: Delrona Award, Mpls. St. Paul Magazine, Health Partners Award Saint Paul Hotel —St. Paul, MN Pastry Chef, October 1995 —March 1997 Awards: DebonaAward and Four -Diamond Winner Franklin Street Bakery, Ruth Sheet Investors North --Minneapolis, MN Executive Pastry Chef/ General Manager, April 1994 — November 1995 Goodfellows/Tejas Restaurant, Ruth Street Investors North— Minneapolis, MN Pastry Chef, April 1993 —April 1994 Goodfellows Restaurant, Ruth Street Investors North—Minneapolis, MN Sous Chef, August 1992—April 1993 Goodfellows Restaurant, Ruth Street Investors North — Minneapolis, MN Cook Tourante, April 1992—August 1992 Ristorante Luei — St. Paul, MN First Cook, September 1990 — April 1992 Hillcrest Country Club, Food & Beverage Managed by Lake Elmo Inn — St. Paul, MN Sous Chef, March 1990 — September 1990 Lake VImo Inn — Lake Elmo, MN First Cook, April 1988 — March 1990 EDUCATION Northeast Metro Technical Institute, Maplewood, MN University of Missouri, Economic and Business Courses Normandale College, Small Business Management State of Minnesota — Food Manager Certificate AWARDS & • Winner of the Great American Eat Right Challenge, Rumble in the Rotunda. Mall of ACCOMPLISHMENTS America • Participated in Twin Cities Youth Culinary Mentorship program with area high schools Developed student internship program with local and national culinary schools including Cordon Bleu Cooking School, Minneapolis Art Institute hrternational and Culinary Institute of America • Regular press coverage in Minnesota Monthly including "Chef's Night Out", "Food Police" and cover story in June 2000 issue. • Created and developed top -line commercial bakery, successfully achieving 18% profit margin. • Sold -out food demonstrations and cooking classes on a quarterly basis for Napa Valley Grille, La Toscana Ristorante, IGtchen Window, Lands Holding, Cooks on Crocus hill, Kitchen Sirdc and Williams Sonoma • Invited to prepare food demonstrations for Twin Cities Food and Wine show, Uptown Art Fair, 14 Window, Chef s Gallery and the Minnesota State Fair. • Appearance on Food Network FOOD FINDS. • Appearance on Food Network' Giant Gingerbread Challenge. • Appearances on Twin Cities Television including Good Day Minnesota, KARE-11 TV, WCCO, KSTP and FOX 9. • Frequent radio appearances onKFAN outdoors. • First Place A.C.F Gold Presentation, 1990. • First place Minnesota Hunters Competition, 1990. • Accomplished Pastry Chef, including recipe development, decorating, pulled sugar; winner James Beard Baking Competition 1995 (3rd Place) and several appearances on PBS Great Chefs Television Show 1996. CHARITABLE o University Pediatrics Foundation, Wine£est 2006 Celebrity Chef (private wine dinner CONTRIBUTIONS sold for $26,000) Liver Foundation Wine Dinner • St, Jude's Children's Hospital • March of Dimes Signature Chefs Auction • Animal Humane Society VOLUNTEER & • Member of the Pinewood PTA CON7IVUMTY • Volunteer for the Minnesota Medical Foundation ACTIVITY • 17 year supporter of Winefest (Children's Research fundraiser) • President of the Tri -Lakes Association e Classroom volunteer in Eaglebrook Church Children's Program ryr„ r of Mounds View Staff Item No: 6B Meeting Date: November 19, 2014 Type of Business: Other Planning Activity To: Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Industrial District Discussion and Code Amendment Staff was researching the 1-1, Industrial District, and noticed that the use "warehouses" is listed both as a permitted use and as a conditional use. Staff recommends amending the code to allow it as a permitted use, and delete it from the conditional uses. Staff also recommends the Planning Commission discuss adding additional uses to the industrial district zoning code to accommodate uses that are currently existing in industrial zoned properties, such as medical supply and pharmaceutical companies. The property at 8400 Coral Sea Street is zoned industrial but the building is an `office park" type building and as such, is not being used by industrial type businesses. There are also many conditional uses in the industrial zoning district, and possibly some could be changed to an allowed use. Recommendation Discuss the industrial zoning district and possible code amendments. Sincerely, Cm,a er(-. Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Chapter 1116, 1-1, Industrial District 2. Chapters 1112 —1115, Business Zoning Districts 1112.01 CHAPTER 1112 B-1, NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT SECTION: 1112.01: Purpose 1112.02: Permitted Uses 1112.03: Accessory Uses 1112.04: Conditional Uses 1112.05: Interim Uses (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) 1112.02 (Rev. 6/10) 1112.01: PURPOSE: The purpose of the B-1, Neighborhood Business District is to provide for the establishment of local centers for convenient, limited office, retail or service outlets which deal directly with the customer for whom the goods or services are furnished. These centers are to provide services and goods for the surrounding neighborhoods and are not intended to draw customers from the entire community. (1988 Code §40.16) 1112.02: PERMITTED USES: The following are permitted uses in a B-1 District: Barber shops Beauty parlors Convenience grocery stores (not supermarket type) Essential services Laundromat, self-service washing and drying. (1988 Code §40.16) Thrift or second-hand store. (Added, Ord. 845, 6-24-10) Retail business for local or neighborhood needs subject to the following limits: - The sale of dry goods, clothing, notions and variety merchandise. - The sale of books, magazines, newspapers, gifts, jewelry, music, stationery or office supplies. (Added, Ord. 845, 6-24-10) City of Mounds Nety 1112.02 1112.02 (Rev. 6/10) Dry cleaning and laundry receiving and pick-up stations (with no cleaning or pressing done on site). (Added, Ord. 845, 6-24-10) Florist Shop. (Added, Ord. 845, 6-24-10) Candy and ice cream stores (shall not include drive-through and/or window pick-up services). (Added, Ord. 845, 6-24-10) Tailor shop, dress malting, clothing rental store. (Added, Ord. 845, 6-24-10) Professional and service business offices such as accountant, architect, broker, engineer, attorney, realtor, appraiser, finance agency, insurance agency, investment agency, travel agency, mortgage company. (Added, Ord. 845, 6-24-10) Medical, dental, chiropractic, counseling or other health-related office or clinic. (Added, Ord. 845, 6-24-10) Repair store that provides services for the repair of home, garden, yard and personal use appliances, tool or equipment (except for motorized vehicles or gas -powered equipment). All repair work shall be done inside the building and there shall not be any outdoor sales or storage. (Added, Ord. 845,6-24-10) The City will allow uses similar to those listed above in this Section if the proposed use would not create a nuisance and if the use would not be noxious or hazardous. The City Council shall review uses that are not clearly similar to those listed in this Section for a determination of compatibility. (Added, Ord. 845, 6-24-10) City of Llounds Neiv 1112.03 1112.03 (Rev. 5/04) 1112.03: ACCESSORY USES: The following are permitted accessory uses in a B-1 District: Subd. 1. Commercial or business buildings and structures for a use accessory to the principal use, but such use shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the gross floor space of the principal use. Subd. 2. Off-street parking as regulated by Chapter 1121 of this Title but not including semi- trailer trucks. Subd. 3. Off-street loading as regulated by Chapter 1122 of this Title. Subd. 4. Signs as regulated by the Mounds View Sign Code. (1988 Code §40.16) Subd. 5. Temporary open or outdoor services, sales and rental as an accessory use and including sales in or from motorized vehicles, trailers, or wagons, subject to the following: (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) a. The activity shall not continue for a period greater than ten (10) consecutive days or for more than three (3) ten (10) day periods per year. Permit periods must be separated by a minimum of thirty (30) days. (Added, Ord. 733, 5-10-04) b. Notwithstanding Article 13, Section 7 of the Minnesota Constitution, a permit issued by the City shall be obtained prior to commencing the activity. (Added, Ord. 733,5-10-04) C. A permit will not be issued without the written consent of the property owner. (Added, Ord. 733, 5-10-04) d. The sales area shall be grassed or surfaced to control dust. (Added, Ord. 733, 5-10-04) e. The activity shall not take up parking space as required for conformity of this Title. (Added, Ord. 733, 5-10-04) f. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right-of-way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Sections 1103.08 and 1103.09 of this Title. (Added, Ord. 733, 5-10-04) See Chapter 1008 of this Code. City ofMoamds Viers 1112.03 1112.03 (Rev. 3/12) Subd. 6. Outdoor Vending Kiosks; provided that: (Added, Ord. 867, 3-8-12) a. The kiosks shall accept only electronic forms of payment. (Added. Ord. 867, 3-8-12) b. The kiosks shall rent only movies and video games. (Added, Ord. 867, 3-8-12) C. The kiosks may be placed only at retail stores, motor fuel stations and restaurants. (Added, Ord. 867,3-8-12) d. Only one business on each property may install outdoor vending kiosks. (Added, Ord. 867, 3-8-12) e. The kiosk shall be placed immediately adjacent to the host business' building. (Added, Ord. 867,3-8-12) f. No loss of parking or interference with the flow of traffic shall occur due to the placement of a vending kiosk. (Added, Ord. 867, 3-8-12) g. The kiosks may be allowed in PUD districts. (Added, Ord. 867, 3-8-12) City of Hounds Neu, 1112.04 1] 12.04 (Rev. 2/97) 1112.04: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in a B-1 District (requiring a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 1125.01 of this Title.) Subd. 1. Governmental and public utility buildings and structures necessary for the health, safety and general welfare of the community; provided, that: a. Conformity with the surrounding neighborhood is maintained and required setbacks and side yard requirements are met. b. Equipment is completely enclosed in a permanent structure with no outside storage. C. Adequate screening and landscaping from neighboring residential districts is provided in accordance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. d. The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(1)e of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. Subd. 2. Professional and commercial (leased) offices; provided, that: a. The traffic generated will not raise traffic volumes beyond the capacity of the surrounding streets. b. The architectural appearance of the building housing the office use shall reflect the building character of the area and shall not be so dissimilar as to cause impairment of property values or constitute a blighting influence within the neighborhood. C. The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(1)e of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. Subd. 3. Commercial planned unit development as regulated by Chapter 1120 of this Title. Subd. 4. Solar energy and wind generator systems and solar and wind generator structuress. (1988 Code §40.16)(Rev. 2/97) Subd. 5. Wireless telecommunications towers and antennae subject to the provisions established in Chapter 1124 of the zoning code. (Ord. 588, 2-10-97) I See Sections 1103.04 and 1103.05 of this Title. City gflfounds View 1112.04 1112.04 (Rev. 4/97) Subd. 6. Day care center, group nursery; provided that: (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) a. No overnight facilities are provided for the children served. Children are delivered and removed daily. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) b. The front yard depth shall be a minimum of thirty five feet (35'). (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) C. Minimum lot area shall be no less than one (1) acre, or as provided in Section 1104.02, subdivision 2b(3). (Ord. 590, 11-25-96) d. Not less than forty (40) square feet of outside play space per child be provided and that such space be suitably fenced and/or screened in accordance with conditions as specified by the City Council. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) e. Adequate off-street parking and access is provided in compliance with Chapter 1121 of this Title. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) f. Adequate off-street loading and service entrances are provided in compliance with Chapter 1122 of this Title. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) g. The site and related parking and service entrances shall be served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) h. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with the Mounds View Sign Code. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) i. The provisions of Section 1125.01, subdivision le of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. (Ord. 590, 11-25-96) j. The distance between any outdoor play yard for a day care center or group nursery and the Highway 10 right-of-way line shall be a minimum of two hundred feet (200'), except as provided in Section 1123.02, subdivision 1c. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) k. No day care center or group nursery shall be permitted where the distance from the property line for the day care center or group nursery to a premise requiring a liquor license, as provided in Section 502 of the Municipal Code, or a license for an adult establishment, as provided in Section 513 of the Municipal Code, if five hundred feet (500') or less, except that the five hundred (500) foot requirement shall not apply to any liquor establishment receiving at least sixty percent (60%) of its annual gross sales revenue from the sale of food. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) City of Mounds Peiv 1112.05 1112.05 (Rev. 5/04) 1112.05: INTERIM USES: The following are interim uses in a B-1 District requiring an Interim Use Permit. An interim use permit must be obtained in accordance with procedures identical in form and substance to the conditional use permit procedures found in Section 1125.01, subdivision 3 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. Interim Use Permits may be approved for a determined or undetermined period of time at the sole discretion of the City Council. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) Subd. 1. Temporary Tents and/or Membrane Structures, under the following conditions: (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) a. The tent or membrane structure shall comply with all provisions of the Fire Code and receive an annual fire permit issued by the Fire Marshal. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) b. The property owner shall annually apply for a Zoning Permit, the duration of which cannot exceed 180 days. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) C. Adequate parking to accommodate the occupancy shall be provided at a ratio of one (1) parking space per forty (40) square feet of tent area. (The City Council may waive the parking requirement if it can be shown that the site has sufficient existing parking capacity.) (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) d. The structure may not be located in or on a parking lot displacing parking stalls, unless it can be shown that an adequate amount of parking remains. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) e. The tent or membrane structure shall be subject to same building setbacks as the principal building on the lot. No tent or membrane structure shall be allowed instead of or without a principal building. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) f. The tent or membrane structure shall be limited in size to five thousand (5,000) square feet or ten percent (10%) of the principal buildings' square footage, whichever is less. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) g. The membrane or cover shall be constructed of a durable reinforced material to withstand wind and snowloads. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) h. The structure shall be anchored to the ground. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) i. The tent or membrane structure shall be maintained in a good condition. Deficiencies shall be corrected as soon as practicable. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) City of Hounds Viery 1112.05 1112.05 (Rev. 5/04) j. The IUP can be reviewed at any time by the City if problems arise which would necessitate revision or termination of the IUP. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) lc. The IUP would become null and void if the property owner fails to comply with the provisions of the permit or if the structure is removed for more than a one (1) year period, or if the property undergoes a change of ownership. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) Exceptions: (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) (1) Tents or Membrane structures erected for periods that do not exceed one (1) week shall not require an interim use permit, however a zoning permit and fire permit are required regardless of the time frame. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) (2) To eliminate duplication of review, when a use (e.g., outdoor sales or storage) would otherwise require a conditional use permit, an interim use permit shall not be required if a tent or membrane structure is involved and is addressed as part of the CUP. (Added, Ord. 735,5-10-04) City of Mounds View 1113.01 CHAPTER 1113 B-2, LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT SECTION: 1113.01: Purpose 1113.02: Permitted Uses 1113.03: Accessory Uses 1113.04: Conditional Uses 1113.05: Interim Uses 1113.01 1113.01: PURPOSE: The purpose of the B-2, Limited Business District is to provide for low intensity, retail or service outlets which deal directly with the customer for whom the goods or services are furnished. The uses allowed in this District are to provide goods and services on a limited community market scale and located in areas which are well served by collector or arterial street facilities at the edge of residential districts. (1988 Code §40.17) City ofMounds View 1113.02 1113.02 (Rev. 9/07) 1113.02: PERMITTED USES: The following are permitted uses in a B-2 District: Subd. 1. Service Oriented Businesses: Service oriented businesses which serve the Mounds View community: Bank, savings and loan, savings credit unions and other financial institutions. Commercial (leased and professional offices). Copy service but not including printing press or newspaper. Dry cleaning pick-up and laundry pick-up stations, including incidental repair and assembly but not including processing. Educational or instructional facilities. (Ord. 632, 7-26-99) Employment agencies. Finance companies. Health and beauty services. Insurance sales, claims and branch offices. Locksmith. Medical and dental offices and clinics. Public utility collection offices. Real estate sales. Shoe repair. Therapeutic massage as defined and regulated in Chapter 514 of the municipal code. (Added, Ord. 798, 9-10-07) Travel bureaus, transportation ticket offices. City of Mounds View 1113.02 1113.02 (Rev. 2/11) Subd. 2. Retail: Limited retail uses which have, as the principle use, sales with warehousing or display secondary to that use. Adult establishment as defined and regulated in Chapter 513 of the Municipal Code. (Ord. 574, 5-13-96) All permitted uses as allowed in the B-1 Neighborhood Business Districts. Antique shop. Art and school supplies. Auto accessory or motor vehicle parts store with no repairs, installations or service work done on any motor vehicles on site, and with no outside sales or storage. (Added, Ord. 856, 2-3-11) Bakery goods and baking of goods for retail sales on the premises. Bicycle sales and repair. Books or stationery stores. Camera and photographic supplies. Candy, ice cream, popcorn, nuts, frozen desserts and soft drinks. Coin and philatelic stores. Costume, clothes rental. Delicatessen. Drugstore. Fabric store. Florist shop. Frozen food store but not including a locker plant. Furniture showroom without warehousing. Furriers when conducted only for retail trade on premises. City of Mounds View 1113.02 1113.02 (Rev. 2/11) Gift or novelty store. Hardware store. Hobby store, including handicraft classes but not to exceed fifteen (15) students. Ice sales with storage not to exceed five (5) tons. Jewelry stores and watch repair. Leather goods and luggage stores. Liquor, off -sale. Meat market but not including processing for a locker plant. Office supplies and equipment. Plumbing, television, radio, electrical sales and such repair as are accessory use to the retail establishments permitted within this District. Record/music shops. Restaurant, cafe, and tea room with a maximum of twenty four (24) seats and two thousand (2,000) square feet in floor area. The restaurant shall not include drive-thru and/or window pick-up services or the serving of food to patrons in their vehicles. (Added, Ord. 856, 2-3-11) Rugs, carpet, tile, paint and wallpaper sales. Shoe stores. Small appliance sales and service. Sporting goods store. Tailor shops. Toy stores. Video rental, sales and service. I Wearing apparel. (Ord. 452, 2-27-89; Ord. 487, 6-25-90) City of Mounds View 1113.02 1113.04 (Rev. 9/00) Subd. 3. Tattoo, Body Piercing, Body Branding, Body Painting or Body Scarring Establishments, provided that: a. Any such establishment shall be separated by no less than one thousand (1,000) feet from any other such establishment located within the City of Mounds View, as measured from the property lines of the property upon which the uses are located. b. The minimum floor space for such use shall be two hundred fifty (250) square feet. C. The establishment and operators shall be licensed and be in compliance with Chapter 515 of the Municipal Code. (Ord. 663, 9-11-00) 1113.03: ACCESSORY USES: The following are permitted accessory uses in a B-2 District: All permitted accessory uses as allowed in a B-1 District. (1988 Code §40.17) 1113.04: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in a B-2 District (requiring a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 1125.01 of this Title): Subd. 1. Governmental and public utility buildings and structures necessary for the health, safety and general welfare of the community; provided, that: a. Conformity with the surrounding neighborhood is maintained, and required setbacks and side yard requirements are met. b. Equipment is completely enclosed in a permanent structure with no outside storage. G. Adequate screening from neighboring uses and landscaping is provided in accordance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. d. The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(1)e of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. Subd. 2. Commercial planned unit development as required by Chapter 1120 of this Title. Subd. 3. Solar energy and wind generator systems and solar and wind generator structures. (1988 Code §40.17) I See Sections 1103.04 and 1103.05 of this Title. City of Mounds View 1113.04 1113.04 (Rev. 8/01) Subd. 4. Veterinary clinics, animal clinics, and animal boarding facilities; provided, that: (Ord. 685, 8-27-01) a. Noise and odor are effectively confined to the premises in accordance with Chapter 6 of this Municipal Code, Nuisances. b. A mechanical ventilation or exhaust system shall be installed to control, capture and remove emissions or odors generated by such use. Such systems shall be separate from other ventilation systems in the building. Such system shall be designed to prevent the migration of emissions or odors to other parts of the building. Installation must comply with Minnesota Building Code Mechanical Systems, Chapter 13451. (Ord. 441, 5-23-88; Ord. 685, 8-27-01) C. All animal boarding activities shall be conducted indoors, except for necessary outdoor exercise. At no time shall any animal be left unsupervised while outdoors. (Ord. 685, 8-27-01) d. Outdoor exercise shall be conducted so as not to unreasonably annoy, injure or endanger the health, safety, comfort, or welfare of the public. (Ord. 685, 8-27-01) e. All animal boarding facilities shall comply with the Nuisance Codes established for the City of Mounds View. (Ord. 685, 8-27-01) f. All animal boarding facilities shall comply with the Minnesota Pet and Companion Animal Welfare Act (Minnesota Statutes, 346.35 — 346.44). (Ord. 685, 8-27-01) Subd. 5. Pet stores; provided, that: a. Noise and odor are effectively confined to the premises in accordance with Chapter 604 of this Municipal Code, Nuisances. b. The boarding of animals is prohibited, except for the purposes of retail sales. C. A mechanical ventilation or exhaust system shall be installed to control, capture and remove emissions or odors generated by such use. Such systems shall be separate from the other ventilation systems in the building. Such system shall be designed to prevent the migration of emissions or odors to other parts of the building. Installation must comply with the Minnesota State Building Code Mechanical Systems, Chapter 1345. (Ord. 448, 9-26-88) 1 See Section 1001.01 of this Code for adoption of State Building Code; see M.S.A. §16B.59 for State Building Code. City of Mounds View 1113.04 1113.04 (Rev. 4/97) Subd. 6. Wireless telecommunications towers and antennae subject to the provisions established in Chapter 1124 of the Zoning Code. (Ord. 588, 2-10-97) Subd. 7. Day care center, group nursery; provided that: (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) a. No overnight facilities are provided for the children served. Children are delivered and removed daily. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) b. The front yard depth shall be a minimum of thirty five feet (35'). (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) C. Minimum lot area shall be no less than one (1) acre, or as provided in Section 1104.02, subdivision 2b(3). (Ord. 590, 11-25-96) d. Not less than forty (40) square feet of outside play space per child be provided and that such space be suitably fenced and/or screened in accordance with conditions as specified by the City Council. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) e. Adequate off-street parking and access is provided in compliance with Chapter 1121 of this Title. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) f. Adequate off-street loading and service entrances are provided in compliance with Chapter 1122 of this Title. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) g. The site and related parking and service entrances shall be served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) h. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with the Mounds View Sign Code. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) i. The provisions of Section 1125.01, subdivision le of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. (Ord. 590, 11-25-96) j. The distance between any outdoor play yard for a day care center or group nursery and the Highway 10 right-of-way line shall be a minimum of two hundred feet (200'), except as provided in Section 1123.02, subdivision le. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) k. No day care center or group nursery shall be permitted where the distance from the property line for the day care center or group nursery to a premise requiring a liquor license, as provided in Section 502 of the Municipal Code, or a license for an adult establishment, as provided in Section 513 of the Municipal Code, if five hundred feet (500') or less, except that the five hundred (500) foot requirement shall not apply to any liquor establishment receiving at least sixty percent (60%) of its annual gross sales revenue from the sale of food. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) City of Mounds View 1113.04 1113.04 (Rev. 4/07) Subd. 8. Neighborhood Motor Fuel Station; provided, that: (Added, Ord. 788, 4-9-07) a. Regardless of whether the dispensing, sales or offering for sale of motor fuels and/or oil is incidental to the conduct of the use or business, the standards and requirements imposed by this Title for motor fuel stations shall apply. These standards and requirements are, however, in addition to other requirements which are imposed for other uses of the property. b. There shall be a maximum of four (4) motor fuel dispensing pumps on the site. C. There shall be no automotive service, repair or rebuilding allowed on the site. d. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. e. The entire site, other than that taken up by a building, structure of plantings, shall be surfaced with a material to control dust, drainage and erosion which is subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. f. A minimum lot area of twenty two thousand five hundred (22,500) square feet and minimum lot dimensions of one hundred fifty feet by one _ hundred thirty feet (150' x 130') be provided. g. A drainage system, subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, shall be installed. h. A curb not less than six inches (6") above grade shall separate the public sidewalk from motor vehicle service areas. i. The lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct source of light visible from adjacent land in residential use or from the public right of way and shall be in compliance with Section 1103.09 of this Title. j. Wherever fuel pumps are to be installed, pump islands shall be installed. k. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than ten feet (10') shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. City of Mounds Vieir 1113.04 1113.04 1. Each light standard island and all islands in the parking lot shall be landscaped or covered. in. Parking or car magazine storage space shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. n. Vehicular access points shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement, shall comply with Chapter 1121 of this Title and shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. o. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be minimized and shall be in compliance with the Mounds View Sign Code. p. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. q. No outside storage except as allowed in compliance with subdivision 4 of this Section shall exist. r. No outside sale or service shall exist. S. Sale of products other than those specifically mentioned in this Section shall be subject to the conditional use permit. t. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the City Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, finds that the general welfare and public betterment can be served as well or better by modifying the conditions. U. The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(1)e of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. I See Chapter 1008 of this Code. City ofMoands View 1113.04 1113.04 (Rev. 9/09) Subd. 9. Car washes as an accessory use to a neighborhood fuel station (drive through, mechanical and self-service); provided, that: (Added, Ord. 833, 9-3-09) a. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. (Added, Ord. 833, 9-3-09) b. Magazining or stacking space is constructed to accommodate that number of vehicles that can be washed during a maximum thirty (30) minute period and shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. (Added, Ord. 833, 9-3-09) C. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than ten feet (10') shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. (Added, Ord. 833, 9-3-09) d. Each light standard island and all islands in the parking lot shall be landscaped or covered. (Added, Ord. 833, 9-3-09) C. Parking or car magazine storage space shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. (Added, Ord. 833, 9-3-09) f. The entire area, other than occupied by the building or plantings, shall be surfaced with material that will control dust, drainage and erosion that is subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. (Added, Ord. 833, 9-3-09) g. The entire area shall have a drainage system that is subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. (Added, Ord. 833, 9-3-09) h. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source is not visible from the public right-of-way or from an abutting residence and shall be in compliance with Section 1103.09 of this Title. (Added, Ord. 833, 9-3-09) i. Vehicular access points shall be limited, shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement and shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. (Added, Ord. 833, 9-3-09) City of Y/ounds He}v 1113.04 1113.05 (Rev. 2/11) j. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall comply with the Mounds View Sign Code. (Added, Ord. 833, 9-3-09) k. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. (Added, Ord. 833, 9-3-09) 1. The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(1)e of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. (Added, Ord. 833, 9-3-09) Subd. 10. Restaurants, cafes and tea rooms with more than twenty four (24) seats and/or two thousand (2,000) square feet of floor area. The restaurant shall not include drive-thru and/or window pick-up services or the serving of food to patrons in their vehicles. (Added, Ord. 856, 2-3-11) 1113.05: INTERIM USES: The following are interim uses in a B-2 District requiring an Interim Use Permit. An interim use permit must be obtained in accordance with procedures identical in form and a substance to the conditional use permit procedures found in Section 1125.01, subdivision 3 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. Interim Use Permits may be approved for a determined or undetermined period of time at the sole discretion of the City Council. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) Subd. 1. All permitted interim uses as allowed in a B -I District. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) City of Alounds Vieiv 1114.01 CHAPTER 1114 B-3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT SECTION: 1114.01: Purpose 1114.02: Permitted Uses 1114.03: Accessory Uses 1114.04: Conditional Uses 1114.05: Interim Uses 1114.01 1114.01: PURPOSE: The purpose of the B-3, Highway Business District is to provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. (1988 Code §40.18) City ofMovnds View 1114.02 1114.03 (Rev.6/98) 1114.02: PERMITTED USES: The following are permitted uses in a B-3 District: All permitted uses as allowed in a B-2 Limited Business District. Amusement centers. Auto accessory stores. Bowling alleys. (Ord. 617, 6-8-98) Commercial recreational uses. Grocery stores, supermarkets. Motels, motor hotels and hotels; provided, that the lot area contains not less than five hundred (500) square feet of lot area per unit. Private clubs or lodges serving food and beverages with use being restricted to members and their guests. Adequate dining room, kitchen and bar space must be provided according to standards imposed upon similar unrestricted customer operations. The serving of alcoholic beverages to members and their guests shall be allowed; provided, that such service is in compliance with applicable Federal, State and Municipal regulations'. Offices of such use shall be limited to no more than twenty percent (20%) of the gross floor area of the building. Public or semi-public recreational buildings and neighborhood or community centers, public and private educational institutions limited to elementary, junior high and senior high schools and religious institutions, such as churches, chapels, temples and synagogues. (Ord. 617, 6-8-98) Rental stores. Restaurants, cafes, tea rooms, taverns, on- and off -sale liquor. Taxi terminals, stands and offices. (Ord. 452, 2-27-89; Ord. 581, 6-10-96) 1114.03: ACCESSORY USES: The following are permitted accessory uses in a B-3 District: All permitted accessory uses as allowed in a B-2, Limited Business District. (1988 Code §40.18) I See Chapters 501, 502 and 503 of this Code; see M.S.A. Chapter 340A. City ofAlounds View 1114.04 1114.04 1114.04: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in a B-3 District (requiring a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 1125.01 of this Title): Subd. 1. Drive-in and convenience food establishments; provided, that: a. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. b. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than ten feet (10') shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. C. Each light standard island and all islands in the parking lot shall be landscaped or covered. d. Parking areas shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. f e. Parking areas and driveways shall be curbed with continuous curbs not less than six inches (6") high above the parking lot or driveway grade. f Vehicular access points shall be limited, shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement, shall comply with Chapter 1121 of this Title and shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. g. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source is not visible from the public right of way or from an abutting residence and shall be in compliance with Section 1103.09 of this Title. h. The entire area shall have a drainage system which is subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. i. The entire area, other than that occupied by buildings or structures or plantings, shall be surfaced with a material which will control dust, drainage and erosion which is subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. j. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with the Mounds View Sign Codet. k. The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(1)e of this Title are considered and 1 satisfactorily met. I See Chapter 1008 of this Code. City ofAlounds View 1114.04 1114.04 Subd. 2. Car washes (drive through, mechanical and self-service); provided, that: a. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. b. Magazining or stacking space is constructed to accommodate that number of vehicles which can be washed during a maximum thirty (30) minute period and shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. C. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than ten feet (10') shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. d. Each light standard island and all islands in the parking lot shall be landscaped or covered. e. Parking or car magazine storage space shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. f. The entire area, other than occupied by the building or plantings, shall be surfaced with material which will control dust, drainage and erosion which is subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. g. The entire area shall have a drainage system which is subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. h. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source is not visible from the public right of way or from an abutting residence and shall be in compliance with Section 1103.09 of this Title. i. Vehicular access points shall be limited, shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement and shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. j. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with the Mounds View Sign Code. k. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. 1. The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(1)e of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. See Chapter 1008 of this Code. City of 4lounds View 1114.04 1114.04 Subd. 3. Motor fuel station, auto repair, minor and tire battery stores and service; provided, that: a. Regardless of whether the dispensing, sales or offering for sale of motor fuels and/or oil is incidental to the conduct of the use or business, the standards and requirements imposed by this Title for motor fuel stations shall apply. These standards and requirements are, however, in addition to other requirements which are imposed for other uses of the property. b. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. C. The entire site, other than that taken up by a building, structure or plantings, shall be surfaced with a material to control dust, drainage and erosion which is subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. d. A minimum lot area of twenty two thousand five hundred (22,500) square feet and minimum lot dimensions of one hundred fifty feet by one hundred thirty feet (150' x 130') be provided. C. A drainage system, subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, shall be installed. f. A curb not less than six inches (6") above grade shall separate the public sidewalk from motor vehicle service areas. g. The lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct source of light visible from adjacent land in residential use or from the public right of way and shall be in compliance with Section 1103.09 of this Title. h. Wherever fuel pumps are to be installed, pump islands shall be installed. i. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than ten feet (10') shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. j. Each light standard island and all islands in the parking lot shall be landscaped or covered. City of Mounds Preen 1114.04 1114.04 k. Parking or car magazine storage space shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. 1. Vehicular access points shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement, shall comply with Chapter 1121 of this Title and shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. m. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be minimized and shall be in compliance with the Mounds View Sign Code. n. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. o. No outside- storage except as allowed in compliance with subdivision 4 of this Section shall exist. p. No outside sale or service except as allowed in compliance with subdivision 5 of this Section shall exist. q. Sale of products other than those specifically mentioned in this Section shall be subject to the conditional use permit. r. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the City Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, finds that the general welfare and public betterment can be served as well or better by modifying the conditions. S. The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(I)e of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. See Chapter 1008 of this Code. City of Mounds Vie a, 1114.04 1114.04 (Rev. 5/04) Subd. 4. Open and outdoor storage as an accessory use; provided, that: a. The area is fenced and screened from view of neighboring uses or if abutting an R District in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. b. Storage is screened from view from the public right of way in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. C. Storage area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. d. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right of way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Section 1103.09 of this Title. e. The open and outdoor storage does not take up parking space as required for conformity to this Title. f. The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(1)e of this Title are considered and s satisfactorily met. Subd. 5. Open or outdoor service, sale and rental as a principal or accessory use and including sales in or from motorized vehicles, trailers or wagons for a period greater than ten (10) days; (Amended, Ord. 733, 5-10-04) a. Outside services, sales and equipment rental connected with the principal use is limited to thirty percent (30%) of the gross floor area of the principal use. b. Outside sales areas are fenced or screened from view of neighboring identical uses or an abutting R District in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. C. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right of way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with sections 1103.08 and 1103.09 of this Title. d. Sales area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. e. The open or outdoor service, sale or rental use does not take up parking space as required for conformity of this Title. f The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(1)e of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. City of Mounds View 1114.04 1114.04 Subd. 6. An accessory use which is a permitted use in a B-2 District, and: a. Such use does not constitute more than thirty percent (30%) of the lot area and not snore than fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area of the principal use. b. The off-street parking and off-street loading requirements of Chapters 1121 and 1122 of this Title have been met. C. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with the Mounds View Sign Code 1. d. The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(1)e of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. Subd. 7. Solar energy and wind generator systems and solar and wind generator structures 2. (1988 Code §40.18) I See Chapter 1108 of this Code. z See Sections 1103.04 and 1103.05 of this Title. City of Mounds View 1114.04 1114.04 Subd. 8. Motor vehicle and recreation equipment sales and garages accessory thereto; provided that: a. Motor vehicle sales shall be on one (1) lot or contiguous lots not separated by a public street, alley, or other use. b. The minimum lot width shall be one hundred fifty feet (150') at the minimum required front yard setback, as defined in Section 1104.01, Yard Requirements for B-3 Zoning Districts. C. A minimum lot area of two (2) acres is required. d. Setbacks shall be as required in Section 1104.01, Yard Requirements for B-3 Zoning Districts. e. The entire site on which motor vehicle sales is located, other than that devoted to buildings and structures or landscaped areas shall be surfaced and maintained with a material to control dust, drainage and erosion which is subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. i f. A drainage system, subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, shall be installed and maintained. All provisions shall apply as included in Chapters 1103, 1010 and 1302 relating to Surface Water Management. g. The following parking requirements shall be met: (1) All customer and employee parking spaces shall be permanently and clearly marked. (2) For every three (3) employees, a minimum of two (2) employee parking spaces shall be provided. (3) A minimum of two (2) off-street parking spaces for each service stall are required. The foregoing required parking spaces shall be shown and designated on the site plan. h. All outdoor illumination on sales lots shall be provided with lenses, reflectors, or shades, which will concentrate the light upon the premises so as to prevent glare or direct rays and shall be in compliance with Section 1103.09 of the Municipal Code. City of Hounds View 1114.04 1114.04 (Rev. 2/97) i. The maximum areas permitted for outside storage of motor vehicles can not exceed two (2) square feet of outside storage to each one (1) square foot of enclosed ground floor area. Not more than one (1) automobile shall be stored on each forty (40) square feet of outside storage. No rooftop parking shall be permitted. j. Accessory buildings to be used solely for sales offices shall not be permitted. Such accessory buildings as are permitted shall be constructed of the same materials as the main structure. k. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with Chapter 1008.08 of the Sign Code regulations. 1. A minimum ten percent (10%) of the property, excluding setback requirements, is required for landscaped green space. The planting plan and type of shrubbery shall require approval of the Planning Commission based upon a recommendation of City Forester. m. A natural screen shall be erected and maintained along all property lines separating the site from any Residential District. The screening shall include landscaping (trees, shrubs, grass, etc.) of a type (layout, species, height, size and density) in compliance with Subdivision 1103.08 of the Title. n. The hours of operation of the facility shall not exceed seven o'clock (7:00) a.m, to ten o'clock (10:00) p.m. o. Test driving routes and patterns must be submitted and approved prior to operation of an automobile sales lot. p. No music or advertisement will be allowed over paging systems. q. All provisions shall apply as included in Section 1103.01 relating to noise within the City Code. r. All car lots shall be brought into conformance within seven (7) years of the date this ordinance is effective. (Ord. 570, 1-8-96; Ord. 581, 6-10-96) Subd. 9. Wireless telecommunications towers and antennae subject to the provisions established in Chapter 1124 of the Zoning Code. (Ord. 588, 2-10-97) City of Mounds View 1114.04 1114.04 (Rev. 4/97) Subd. 10. Day care center, group nursery; provided that: (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) a. No overnight facilities are provided for the children served. Children are delivered and removed daily. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) b. The front yard depth shall be a minimum of thirty five feet (35'). (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) C. Minimum lot area shall be no less than one (1) acre, or as provided in Section 1104.02, subdivision 2b(3). (Ord. 590, 11-25-96) d. Not less than forty (40) square feet of outside play space per child be provided and that such space be suitably fenced and/or screened in accordance with conditions as specified by the City Council. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) C. Adequate off-street parking and access is provided in compliance with Chapter 1121 of this Title. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) E Adequate off-street loading and service entrances are provided in compliance with 9 Chapter 1122 of this Title. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) g. The site and related parking and service entrances shall be served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) h. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with the Mounds View Sign Code. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) i. The provisions of Section 1125.01, subdivision le of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. (Ord. 590, 11-25-96) j. The distance between any outdoor play yard for a day care center or group nursery and the Highway 10 right-of-way line shall be a minimum of two hundred feet (200'), except as provided in Section 1123.02, subdivision lc. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) k. No day care center or group nursery shall be permitted where the distance from the property line for the day care center or group nursery to a premise requiring a liquor license, as provided in Section 502 of the Municipal Code, or a license for an adult establishment, as provided in Section 513 of the Municipal Code, is five hundred feet (500') or less, except that the five hundred (500) foot requirement shall not apply to any liquor establishment receiving at least sixty percent (60%) of its annual gross sales revenue from the sale of food. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) City of Mounds View 1114.05 1114.05 (Rev. 5/04) 1114.05: INTERIM USES: The following are interim uses in a B-3 District requiring an Interim Use Permit. An interim use permit must be obtained in accordance with procedures identical in form and substance to the conditional use permit procedures found in Section 1125.01, subdivision 3 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. Interim Use Permits may be approved for a determined or undetermined period of time at the sole discretion of the City Council. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) Subd. 1. All permitted interim uses as allowed in a B-2 District. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) City ofn9ounds View 1115.01 CHAPTER 1115 B4, REGIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT SECTION: 1115.01: Propose 1115.02: Permitted Uses 1115.03: Accessory Uses 1115.04: Conditional Uses 1115.05: Interim Uses 1115.01: PURPOSE: The purpose of the B-4, Regional the establishment of commercial and service activities which from the entire community or region. (1988 Code §40.19) City ofd,founds View 1115.01 Business District is to provide for draw from and service customers 1115.02 1115.03 (Rev. 6/98) 1115.02: PERMITTED USES: The following are permitted uses in a B-4 District: All permitted uses as allowed in a B-3 District. Amusement places (such as dance halls or roller rinks). Enclosed boat and marine sales. Department and discount stores. Dry cleaning, including plant accessory heretofore, pressing and repairing. Electrical appliance stores, including incidental repair and assembly but not fabricating or manufacturing. Furniture stores. Garden supply stores. Public garage. Theaters, not of the outdoor drive-in type. Variety stores, 5 and 10 cent stores and stores of similar nature. (Ord. 452, 2-27-89; Ord. 617, 6-8-98) 1115.03: ACCESSORY USES: The following are permitted accessory uses in a B-4 District: All permitted accessory uses as allowed in a B-3 District. (1988 Code §40.19) City of Mounds View 1115.04 1115.04 (Rev. 5/04) 1115.04: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in a B-4 District (requiring a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 1125.01 of this Title): Subd. 1. Open and outdoor storage as an accessory use; provided, that: a. The area is fenced and screened from view of neighboring residential uses or if abutting a residential district in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. b. Storage is screened from view from the public right of way in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(l) through (5) of this Title. C. Storage area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. d. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right of way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Section 1103.09 of this Title. e. The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(1)e of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. Subd. 2. Open or outdoor service, sale and rental as an accessory use and including sales in or from motorized vehicles, trailers or wagons for a period greater than ten (10) days; (Amended, Ord. 733, 5-10-04) a. Outside service, sales and equipment rental connected with the principal use is limited to thirty percent (30%) of the gross floor area of the principal use. b. Outside sales areas are fenced or screened from view of neighboring residential uses or an abutting residential district in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. C. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right of way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Section 1103.09 of this Title. d. Sales area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. e. The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(1)e of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. City of Uounds View 1115.04 1115.04 (Rev. 2/97) Subd. 3. Custom manufacturing, restricted production and repair limited to the following: art, needlework, jewelry from precious metals, watches, dentures, optical lenses; provided, that: a. Such use is accessory as defined by subdivision 1102.02(1) of this Title to the principal use of the property. b. Does not conflict with the character of development intended for this Zoning District. C. The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(1)e of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. Subd. 4. Commercial planned unit development as regulated by Chapter 1120 of this Title. Subd. 5. Solar energy and wind generator systems and solar and wind generator structures. (1988 Code §40.19) Subd. 6. Wireless telecommunications towers and antennae subject to the provisions established in Chapter 1124 of the Zoning Code. (Ord. 588, 2-10-97) See Sections 1103.04 and 1103.05 of this Title. City of Mounds View 1115.04 1115.04 (Rev. 4/97) Subd. 7. Day care center, group nursery; provided that: (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) a. No overnight facilities are provided for the children served. Children are delivered and removed daily. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) b. The front yard depth shall be a minimum of thirty five feet (35') (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) C. Minimum lot area shall be no less than one (1) acre, or as provided in Section 1104.02, subdivision 2b(3). (Ord. 590, 11-25-96) d. Not less than forty (40) square feet of outside play space per child be provided and that such space be suitably fenced and/or screened in accordance with conditions as specified by the City Council. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) e. Adequate off-street parking and access is provided in compliance with Chapter 1121 of this Title. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) f. Adequate off-street loading and service entrances are provided in compliance with Chapter 1122 of this Title. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) g. The site and related parking and service entrances shall be served by an arterial or collector street, of sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) h. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with the Mounds View Sign Code. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) i. The provisions of Section 1125.01, subdivision le of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. (Ord. 590, 11-25-96) j. The distance between any outdoor play yard for a day care center or group nursery and the Highway 10 right-of-way line shall be a minimum of two hundred feet (200'), except as provided in Section 1123.02, subdivision lc. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) k. No day care center or group nursery shall be permitted where the distance from the property line for the day care center or group nursery to a premise requiring a liquor license, as provided in Section 502 of the Municipal Code, or a license for an adult establishment, as provided in Section 513 of the Municipal Code, is five hundred feet (500') or less, except that the five hundred (500) foot requirement shall not apply to any liquor establishment receiving at least sixty percent (60%) of its annual gross sales revenue from the sale of food. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) City ofdlounds View 1115.05 1115.05 (Rev. 5/04) 1115.05: INTERIM USES: The following are interim uses in a B-4 District requiring an Interim Use Permit. An interim use permit must be obtained in accordance with procedures identical in form and substance to the conditional use permit procedures found in Section 1125.01, subdivision 3 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. Interim Use Permits may be approved for a determined or undetermined period of time at the sole discretion of the City Council. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) Subd. 1. All permitted interim uses as allowed in a B-3 District. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) Crtp ofWfoainds Nem 1116.01 SECTION: 1116.01: 1116.02: 1116.03: 1116.04: 1116.05: 1116.06: CHAPTER 1116 I-1, INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Purpose Permitted Uses Accessory Uses Conditional Uses Compliance with Other Provisions Interim Uses 1116.01 1116.01: PURPOSE: The purpose of the I-1, Industrial District is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and industrial development and use. (1988 Code §40.20) City of Mounds View 1116.02 1116.03 (Rev. 9/09) 1116.02: PERMITTED USES: The following are permitted uses in an I-1 District: Adult establishments as defined and regulated in Chapter 513 of the Municipal Code. (Ord. 574, 5-13-96) Building materials sales yards, retail lumber yard, contractors equipment sales and rentals, storage and sale of food, and fuel not for resale. Essential services. Flammable liquids: Above ground storage not to exceed a total of eight hundred (800) gallons; underground bulk storage not to exceed twenty five thousand (25,000) gallons if located not less than fifty feet (50') from a residential district. (Amended, Ord. 830, 9-3-09) Golf Course. (Added, Ord. 721, 10-13-03) Governmental and public utility building and structures. Greenhouses and nurseries. Motorized vehicle or recreational equipment sales and service and rental. Newspaper and general printings. Warehouses. Wholesale and retail showrooms and offices; provided, that at least fifty percent (50%) of the principal building is devoted to storage or warehousing of merchandise. (1988 Code §40.20) 1116.03: ACCESSORY USES: The following are permitted accessory uses in an 1-1 District: Buildings and structures for a use accessory to the principal use. Offices accessory to the principal use. Off-street parking as regulated by Chapter 1121 of this Title. Off-street loading as regulated by Chapter 1122 of this Title. Signs as regulated by the Mounds View Sign Code. (1988 Code §40.20) I See Chapter 1008 of this Code. City of Mounds Mery 1116.04 1116.04 1116.04: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in an I-1 District (requiring a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 1125.01 of this Title): Subd. 1. Open and outdoor storage as an accessory use. Subd. 2. Open or outdoor service, sale and rental as a principal or an accessory use and including sales in or from motorized vehicles, trailers or wagons; provided, that: a. Accessory outside service, sales and equipment rental connected with a principal use is limited to thirty percent (30%) of the gross floor area of the principal use. b. Outside sales areas are fenced or screened from view of neighboring residential uses or an abutting residential district in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(l) through (5) of this Title. Subd. 3. Motor freight terminals. Subd. 4. Industrial planned unit development as regulated by Chapter 1119 of this Title. Subd. 5. Solar energy and wind generator systems and solar and wind generator structures. Subd. 6. Warehouses. Subd. 7. Laboratories, experimental, film and/or testing. Subd. 8. Manufacturing, compounding, processing, packaging or treatment of flammable liquids. Subd. 9. Automobile assembly and/or major repair. Subd. 10. Creamery, bottling plant, ice cream manufacture, ice manufacture, cold storage and/or mills distribution station. Subd. 11. Manufacturing, compounding, processing, packaging or treatment of cosmetics, pharmaceuticals and food products and the rendering or refining of fats and oils. I See Sections 1103.04 and 1103.05 of this Title. City ofdl(ounds View 1116.04 1116.04 (Rev. 9/09) Subd. 12. Manufacturing, compounding, assembly or treatment of articles or merchandise from previously prepared materials, such as bond cloth, cork, fiber, leather, paper, plastic, metals, stones, tobacco, wax, yarns and wools. Subd. 13. Manufacture of musical instruments, novelties and molded rubber products. Subd. 14. Manufacture or assembly of electrical appliances, instruments and devices. Subd. 15. Manufacture of pottery or other similar ceramic products, only by electricity or natural gas. Subd. 16. Manufacture and repair of electrical signs, advertising structures and light sheet metal products, including heating and ventilating equipment. Subd. 17. Blacksmith, welding or other metal shop. Subd. 18. Laundries, bag, carpet and rug cleaning. Subd. 19. Foundry casting lightweight nonferrous metals or electric foundry not causing noxious fumes or odors. Subd. 20. Storage of flammable liquids over eight hundred (800) gallons above ground. (1988 Code §40.20) (Amended, Ord. 830, 9-3-09) Subd. 21. Wireless telecommunications towers and antennae subject to the provisions established in Chapter 1124 of the Zoning Code. (Ord. 588, 2-10-97) City of Mounds View 1116.04 1116.04 (Rev. 4/97) Subd. 22. Day care center, group nursery; provided that: (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) a. No overnight facilities are provided for the children served. Children are delivered and removed daily. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) b. The front yard depth shall be a minimum of thirty five feet (35') (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) C. Minimum lot area shall be no less than one (1) acre, or as provided in Section 1104.02, subdivision 2b(3). (Ord. 590, 11-25-96) d. Not less than forty (40) square feet of outside play space per child be provided and that such space be suitably fenced and/or screened in accordance with conditions as specified by the City Council. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) e. Adequate off-street parking and access is provided in compliance with Chapter 1121 of this Title. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) f Adequate off-street loading and service entrances are provided in compliance with Chapter 1122 of this Title. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) g. The site and related parking and service entrances shall be served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. (Ord. 595,4-14-97) h. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with the Mounds View Sign Code. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) i. The provisions of Section 1125.01, subdivision le of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. (Ord. 590, 11-25-96) j. The distance between any outdoor play yard for a day care center or group nursery and the Highway 10 right-of-way line shall be a minimum of two hundred feet (200'), except as provided in Section 1] 23.02, subdivision lc. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) k. No day care center or group nursery shall be permitted where the distance from the property line for the day care center or group nursery to a premise requiring a liquor license, as provided in Section 502 of the Municipal Code, or a license for an adult establishment, as provided in Section 513 of the Municipal Code, is five hundred feet (500') or less, except that the five hundred (500) foot requirement shall not apply to any liquor establishment receiving at least sixty percent (60%) of its annual gross sales revenue from the sale of food. (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) i City of Hounds Vierov 1116.05 1116.06 (Rev. 5/04) 1116.05: COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER PROVISIONS: All permitted, accessory or conditional uses in an I-1 District shall comply with the following: Subd. 1. Code Sections 1103.08, 1103.09, 1103.10 and 1103.11 of this Title regarding screening, glare, smoke, dust, odors and noise are adhered to. Subd. 2. Traffic generated would be compatible and within the operating limits of the primary streets used for access. Subd. 3. The area is fenced and screened from view of neighboring residential uses, or if abutting a residential district, in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(l) through (5) of this Title. Subd. 4. Storage is screened from view from the public right of way in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. Subd. 5. Storage and sales areas are grassed or surfaced to control dust. Subd. 6. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right of way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Section 1103.09 of this Title. Subd. 7. The provisions of subdivision 1125.01(1)e of this Title are considered and satisfactorily met. Subd. 8. Permits or approvals required from other public agencies (i.e., Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Department of Natural Resources, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and Rice Creek Watershed District) be obtained prior to final approval of use. (1988 Code §40.20; 1993 Code) 1116.06: INTERIM USES: The following are interim uses in an I-1 District requiring an Interim Use Permit. An interim use permit must be obtained in accordance with procedures identical in form and substance to the conditional use permit procedures found in Section 1125.0 1, subdivision 3 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. Interim Use Permits may be approved for a determined or undetermined period of time at the sole discretion of the City Council. (Added, Ord. 735,5-10-04) Subd. 1. All permitted interim uses as allowed in a B-4 District. (Added, Ord. 735, 5-10-04) City ofALounds View PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting October 1, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Schiltgen at 7:00 p.m. for October 1, 2014. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Carvelli-Yu, Elofson, Rundle, and Schiltgen. Absent and Excused: Commissioner Birken, Love and Stevenson. Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller. r Index to Minutes Page Approval of Minutes 1 VR2014-008 Consideration of Variance to Allow a 6 -foot Fence in Both 2 of the Front Yards of a Corner Lot 3. Approval of Minutes August 20, 2014. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Carvelli-Yu. To approve the Minutes of the August 20, 2014 regular Planning Commission meeting as presented. Ayes — 4 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda s None. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting October 1, 2014 Page 2 5. Planning Cases A. VR2014-008 Consideration of a Variance to Allow a 6 -foot Fence in Both of the Front Yards of a Corner Lot Applicant: City of Mounds View Address: 2408 Hillview Road (Municipal Well No. 4) Planning Associate Heller indicated the applicant, City of Mounds View, is requesting a variance to install a 6 -foot tall chain-link fence around the entire property where Municipal Well No. 4 is located, on the southeast coiner of Hillview Road and Edgewood Drive. Since two streets border corner lots, they have two front yards. As such, the City Code requirement for front yards applies to two sides of the property, which means corner lots have additional limitations. Associate Heller stated according to the City Code, Section 1103.08, Subdivision 3, fences greater than 48 inches (4 feet) tall are not allowed in the front yard without a variance. The Zoning Code also establishes a sight triangle that limits all obstructions within the area at the corner of intersections, measured thirty (30) feet from the point where the property lines meet at the intersection of two streets. The proposed fence would not be located within the sight triangle. Staff reviewed the variance considerations in detail with the Commission and recommended approval of the request. Vice Chair Schiltgen opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. Haidelisa Florentine, 2431 Hillview Road, explained she lived across the street from the municipal well. She supported the fence being added for safety reasons. Vice Chair Schiltgen asked if there would be a hinged fence or gate at the driveway entrance. Associate Heller explained there would be some sort of gate at the entrance driveway. Commissioner Carvelli-Yu questioned if the exterior of the building was lit. Associate Heller stated this was the case. Vice Chair Schiltgen closed the public hearing at 7:09 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Elofson. To approve Resolution 1016-14, a Resolution Approving a Variance to Allow a 6 -foot Fence in the North and West Front Yards of a Coater Lot at 2408 Hillview Road; Planning Case No. VR2014-008. Ayes — 4 6. Other Planning Activity None. Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 7. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. October 15, 2014 B. November 5, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. September 17, 2014 The Commission discussed the September 17, 2014 meeting minutes. 9. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases October 1, 2014 Page 3 Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. She explained the Council was discussing the use of tubular structures on residential lots. She noted the Council recently approved the preliminary plat for Multi -Tech and work has begun on this site. In addition, the cell tower for Dell -Comm was approved. It was noted the City hired a new part-time Business Development Coordinator. 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports None. 11. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Vice Chair Schiltgen adjourned the meeting at 7:19 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA December 3, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: October 1. 2014 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases A. None i 6. Other Planning Activity A. Discuss Proposed Code Amendment for 1-1, Industrial Zoning District Uses B. Discuss Proposed Code Amendments to Title 1100 for Renewable Energy Systems C. Set 2015 Planning Commission Meeting Schedule 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, December 17, 2014 B. Wednesday, January 7, 2015 8. Review Minutes: A. November 19, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion � MoulvDs Vi9v of Mounds View Staff To: From: Item Title/Subject: Item No: 6A Meeting Date: December 19, 2014 Type of Business: Other Planning Activity Planning Commission Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Industrial District Discussion and Code Amendment At the November 19, 2014 Planning Commission meeting, Staff and the Commission discussed adding additional uses to the industrial district zoning code. The Commission was supportive of adding medical supply and pharmacy to the allowed uses, particularly to accommodate businesses that currently exist in industrial zoned properties. The Commission also felt it was appropriate to change some current conditional uses to be allowed uses. Recommendation Review and discuss the attached resolution with proposed changes to the 1-1, Industrial Zoning Code. Sincerely, W Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Resolution 1017-14 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1017-14 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1116 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY CODE ABOUT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT USES; SPECIAL PLANNING CASE 191-14 WHEREAS, City staff has recommended that amendments be made to the industrial zoning code relating to uses; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission agrees with the City Staff recommendation to allow additional uses in industrial districts; and, WHEREAS, City staff has amended Chapter 1116, Section 1116.02 of the Mounds View City Code by deleting the stnsken language and adding the underlined text as follows: Section 1116.02 Permitted Uses 1116.02: PERMITTED USES: The following are permitted uses in an 1-1 District: Adult establishments as defined and regulated in Chapter 513 of the Municipal Code. (Ord. 574, 5-13-96) Blacksmith, welding or other metal shop. Building materials sales yards, retail lumber yard, contractors equipment sales and rentals, storage and sale of food, and fuel not for resale. Essential services. Flammable liquids: Above ground storage not to exceed a total of eight hundred (800) gallons; underground bulk storage not to exceed twenty five thousand (25,000) gallons if located not less than fifty feet (50') from a residential district. (Amended, Ord. 830, 9-3-09) Foundry casting lightweight nonferrous metals or electric foundry not causing noxious fumes or odors. Golf Course. (Added, Ord. 721, 10-13-03) Governmental and public utility building and structures. Greenhouses and nurseries. Laboratories, experimental, film and/or testing. Resolution 1017-14 Page 2 Laundries, bag, carpet and rug cleaning. Manufacture or assembly of electrical appliances, instruments and devices. Manufacturing compounding, assembly or treatment of articles or merchandise from previously prepared materials such as bond cloth, cork fiber, leather, paper, plastic, metals, stones, tobacco, wax, yarns and wools. Manufacturing compounding processing, packaging or treatment of cosmetics pharmaceuticals and food products and the rendering or refining of fats and oils. Manufacture of musical instruments, novelties and molded rubber products. Manufacture of pottery or other similar ceramic products, only by electricity or natural gas. Manufacture and repair of electrical signs, advertising structures and light sheet metal products, including heating and ventilating equipment. Medical Supplies Motorized vehicle or recreational equipment sales and service and rental. Newspaper and general printings. Office. Pharmacies, Stand Alone, not part of a retail store. Rental Stores. Rugs, carpet, tile, paint or wallpaper stores. Warehouses. Wholesale and retail showrooms and offices; provided, that at least fifty percent (50%) of the principal building is devoted to storage or warehousing of merchandise. (1988 Code §40.20) Section 1116.02: Conditional Uses 1116.04: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in an 1-1 District (requiring a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 1125.01 of this Title): Subd. 1. Open and outdoor storage as an accessory use. Resolution 1017-14 Page 3 Subd. 2. Open or outdoor service, sale and rental as a principal or an accessory use and including sales in or from motorized vehicles, trailers or wagons; provided, that: a. Accessory outside service, sales and equipment rental connected with a principal use is limited to thirty percent (30%) of the gross floor area of the principal use. b. Outside sales areas are fenced or screened from view of neighboring residential uses or an abutting residential district in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1) through (5) of this Title. Subd. 3. Motor freight terminals. Subd. 4. Industrial planned unit development as regulated by Chapter 1119 of this Title. Subd. 5. Wind Energy Conversion Systems as regulated by Chapter 1128 of this Title. Subd. 6.Warehouses. Subd. 7. I aber..tere expeFimental, ram aR GF te6tiRg. Subd. 8. Manufacturing, compounding, processing, packaging or treatment of flammable liquids. Subd. 9. Automobile assembly and/or major repair. Subd. 10. Creamery, bottling plant, ice cream manufacture, ice manufacture, cold storage and/or milk distribution station. Subd. 11. Ma f T GtUFiRg, rein r^Gessing, packaging eF treatment of and eik; Subd. 12. Man fa Gt iRg Gempounding, assembly er treatment of artirlc h.. di f ld tilh s bend sloth fiber rrti � Previously my n ren.,rematerials, r.nanoro leather, paper, lt'tltes tebenne ���enlc nasn meas Son .nnv yarns and Subd. 13. . •• - Su •• - - 15 • • • ��iCT.r[LTS7f17ZT:T.�7-T.L11'!.[T8577►S11,T.'7TZT.t�1-1:7[71Tr377RS7�R=Ts7:T.�R.9:S>�aTT-S _. .. Subd.metal products, heating and ventilating equipment. 17. BlaGksmith, welding OF othermetal Resolution 1017-14 Page 4 •• ' Subd. 20. Storage of flammable liquids over eight hundred (800) gallons above ground. (1988 Code §40.20) (Amended, Ord. 830, 9-3-09) Subd. 21. Wireless telecommunications towers and antennae subject to the provisions established in Chapter 1124 of the Zoning Code. (Ord. 588, 2-10-97) Subd. 22. Day care center, group nursery; provided that: (Ord. 595, 4-14-97) WHEREAS, amending the City Code to allow more uses in industrial zoning districts would better serve the public and support businesses; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission concurs that an amendment to the City Code is warranted and justified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of amendments to Section 1116 of the Mounds View City Code as defined herein. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 3'd day of December, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) MOurmS VfE-V of Mounds View Staff To: From: Item Title/Subject: Item No: 613 Meeting Date: December 19, 2014 Type of Business: Other Planning Activity Planning Commission Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Code Amendments for Renewable Energy Systems In 2013, Ordinance 883 was passed which created completely new requirements in the City Code about renewable energy systems. There were several areas throughout the code that referred to solar and wind turbines, and not all of them were changed in Ordinance 883. Solar energy and wind generator systems are still listed as conditional uses in all the business zoning districts, and geothermal systems aren't listed at all. The new ordinance changed solar energy systems and geothermal energy systems to be an allowed use in all zoning districts, and wind turbine systems are a conditional use only in industrial districts. Staff is proposing Resolution 1019-14 which makes the suggested changes to the residential and business zoning districts so it is consistent with the new renewable energy requirements in Chapter 1128. Recommendation Review and discuss the attached resolution with proposed changes to the Zoning Code. Sincerely, Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Resolution 1019-14 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION IS*IQItelIIs] kqIkRNID]l[MEll CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 1100 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY CODE ABOUT RENEWABLE ENERGY; SPECIAL PLANNING CASE 188-13 WHEREAS, City staff has recommended that amendments be made to the zoning code relating to renewable energy; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission agrees with the City Staff recommendation to clarify the renewable energy requirements in residential and business districts; and, WHEREAS, City staff has amended Title 1100 of the Mounds View City Code by deleting the sR;^^en language and adding the underlined text as follows: CHAPTER 1106 R-1. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 1106.03: ACCESSORY USES: The following are permitted accessory uses in an R-1 District: (1988 Code §40.10) Subd. 8. Solar Energy Sources and Systems and Geothermal Energv Sources and Svstems as regulated by Chapter 1128 of this Title. CHAPTER 1112 B-1, NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT 1112.03: ACCESSORY USES: The following are permitted accessory uses in a B-1 District: Subd. 7. Solar Energy Sources and Systems and Geothermal Energy Sources and Systems as regulated by Chapter 1128 of this Title. 1112.04: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in a B-1 District (requiring a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 1125.01 of this Title.) Tyner : _ • _ - ..rr.�er� r�nrr 6ewerata Resolution 1019-14 Page 2 CHAPTER 1113 B-2, LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT 1113.04: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in a B-2 District (requiring a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 1125.01 of this Title): CHAPTER 1114 B-3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT 1114.04: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in a B-3 District (requiring a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 1125.01 of this Title): .•11111111111111iiiiii 11111111111liEll 1111119 V! 1111 CHAPTER 1115 B-4, REGIONAL BUSINESS 1115.04: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in a B-4 District (requiring a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 1125.01 of this Title): WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission concurs that an amendment to the City Code is warranted and justified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of amendments to Title 1100 of the Mounds View City Code as defined herein. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 3`d day of December, 2014. Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: James Ericson, City Administrator (SEAL) 9f Mounds view Item No20 Dat. p hnnin ef 3ActNit 4 Meeting other .Type of Business• View Planning Commission Planning Associate Mounds 1018-14, Heidi Heller, ResolutionSchedule. Con slderaton s 215 Meeting Establishing the Planning i'. Gomm�ss� ect:resolution hes its meet'09 schedule each Year by oduction; Comission establ�s Wednesday Qt every ie Planningmal first and third for 215 representeahe usu iscussion: osed ext Y The meeting no prop. witb holiday s There are no confUcts lishin9the month 1p18-14, estab Recornmendatwn. usttbe sch edule. Approve Resolution eeting dateof he P arming Commission• piscuss the m schedule 2p15 meeting Respectfully s�unW'Itted, (:MJI L-- Heidi Heller Planning Associate view MO(/Np RESP PLANNING COMMIS N 101g 14 SIGN CITY OF COUNTY OF NDS VIEW RESOLUTAftey ION ESTAB STATE OF MINNE Tq IIVG MOUNDS VIEW pLANNI G AND ZOEETING SCHED NING COICHeD OLE OF THE WHEREAS meeti Hper Mon h durMounds the year Viw panning Com 5, and, mission intends to hold two reg( Of each montRhEor ache Planning Co amended; andmmission will meet °n the first and provideW HEREAS the an order/ schedule of third Wednesde NOW,Y systern for use by theeting dates sh Planning CREFORE Planning Cornarliibe oestablished an THE rnmissio d posted ns Official Mee iOESOLVEDthat n, staff and general publi desir gE IT p1g schedule Exhibit 1, with pi es to hold WALLY RES for the Year2015 attached hereto, is th State law, Coecial or em OLVED that if the Code fequireMents nd COmuchg ee Ings wills e h is required to of pted this 3 Mission ylaws• b held in accordance Ado 'day of December, 2014 ATTEST Gary Stevenson, Chairperson (SEAL) dames Ericson CitYAdminis trator EXHIBIT 1. 2015 MEETING SCHEDULE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION January 7 January 21 February 4 February 18 March 4 March 18 April 1 April 15 May 6 May 20 June 3 June 17 July 1 July 15 August 5 August 19 September 2 September 16 October 7 October 21 November 4 November 18 December 2 December 16 PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting November 19, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for November 19, 2014. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Birken, Carvelli-Yu, Elofson, Love, Rundle, Schiltgen, and Stevenson. Absent and Excused: None. Also Present: Index to Minutes Approval of Minutes Planning Associate Heidi Heller. Review Planning Commissioner Applications Page 1 2 Discuss I-1, Industrial, Zoning District Uses and Proposed Code Amendment 2 3. Approval of Minutes September 17, 2014. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Schiltgen/Commissioner Rundle. To approve the Minutes of the September 17, 2014 regular Planning Commission meeting as presented. Ayes — 7 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting November 19, 2014 Page 2 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. 5. Planning Cases None. 6. Other Planning Activity A. Review Planning Commissioner Applications Planning Associate Heller informed the Commission that the term of three Planning Commission members — Gary Stevenson, Jessica Birken and Julianne Love - expire at the end of the year. The City advertised the vacancies, with applications due on November 10, 2014. Staff received applications from the three current Commissioners for another term, and two other applications for the Planning Commission were received by the City. She requested the group review the submitted applications and make a recommendation to the City Council. It was noted the Council would be making the official appointments by the end of the year. Commissioner Birken explained she was willing to serve another term. Steven Roste and Royal Dahlstrom introduced themselves to the Commission. A discussion was held between the Commission members and the two volunteers interested in serving on the Planning Commission. The Commission took a vote for the three open Planning Commission seats. Associate Heller tallied the votes and announced that Gary Stevenson, Jessica Birken and Julianne Love would be recommended to the City Council for reappointment. Chair Stevenson thanked Steven Roste and Royal Dahlstrom for their willingness to serve and encouraged them to consider volunteering on another City commission or sub -committee. B. Discuss I-1, Industrial, Zoning District Uses and Proposed Code Amendment Planning Associate Heller informed the Commission that staff was researching the I-1, Industrial District, and noticed that the use "warehouses" is listed both as a permitted use and as a conditional use. Staff recommends amending the code to allow it as a permitted use, and delete it from the conditional uses. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting November 19, 2014 Page 3 mmission discuss adding additional uses to the Assoeiate Heller commended the Planning Co industrial district zoning code to accommodate uses that are currently existing in industrial zoned utical companies. T he properties, such as medical supply and pharmacee and as s h, islnot Sea Street is zoned industrial but the building is an "office park" type building being used by industrial type businesses. There are also many conditional uses in the industrial zoning district, and possibly some could be changed to an allowed use. Chair Stevenson explained that industrial uses typically have limited visitor parking available so that should be a consideration when adding more allowed uses. Associate Heller commented that parking for this business was not an issue, and typically isn't an issue for industrial uses due to the large size of the properties. Commissioner Carvelli-Yu asked if the medical/pharmacy use could be grandfathered in. She wanted to see the City support its local businesses. Associate Heller said this was not possible. The additional uses either need to be added to the zoning code or the business would be informed it was not in compliance. Commissioner Carvelli-Yu recommended the City be accommodating to this business as it had been in the community for the past 20 years. She did not believe that additional retail would move into this area of the city given its location. She explained that the City's vision was to be a medical industry hub and this business aligned with this vision. Commissioner Birken suggested the current businesses be made permitted uses within the I-1 Zoning District. permitted uses in the I-1 Industrial Zoning District. Associate Heller reviewed a list of suggested Associate Heller indicated she would add language to the code that would allow for medical supply, a stand-alone pharmacy and office as allowed uses. She then discussed the timeline for approving for a Zoning Code Amendment. She anticipated the Commission could review the code amendment at their December 3`d meeting. Commissioner Love discussed a reference to the City Forester in Chapter 1114.04 Subd. 1 and recommended this language be revised since the city no longer has a forester. 7. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. December 3, 2014 B. December 17, 2014 Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 8. Review Minutes: A. October 1, 2014 The Commission discussed the October 1, 2014 meeting minutes. 9• Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases November 19, 2014 Page 4 Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. She discussed the exterior updates being made to Sam's Market. She noted new representatives from Sam's Market would be applying for a tobacco license. She reported the Anna Place, Multi -Tech and Longview Estates plats have now been recorded. She stated newly hired City employee Brian Beeman, the Business Development Coordinator, has been marketing the Crossroad Pointe property. 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports None. 11. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 8:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.