Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-09-1996 } } UNAFJPROVED • ,, 1 PROCEEDINGS OF'1' E , MO(JJYDS.VITW • 2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 3 4 +Ieeting No.26 5 °. • September 9, 1996 6 Mounds"View City Hall 7 2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View MN 55112 8 *********************************************************************************** 9 10 CAI.4L TO ORDER 11 12 The Economic Development Authority was called to order by President Linke on September 9, 1996 at -13 9:05 p.m 14 15 11Q..L c LL 1.6. 17 AmtlEaS?RESENT: President,:Terry Linke;Vice President Phyllis Blanchard,Secretary,Julie Trude; 18 Conamissloner Gary Quick, Commissioner-Sue Haokner,Executive Director`Cathy Bennett Clerk 19 Administrator Chock Whiting,and City Attorney"Bob Long; 20 21 QT P S> : None 22 23 APP1* OVi L QF AC,ENDA: r,;3 24 25 It was asked that one item be added to the Agenda under EDA Business,7(D) Authorization for City II26 Attorney to prepare a Resolution and a',Quit Claim Deed for the Bel-Rae property. 27 28 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Blanchard to approve the EDA"Agenda as Amended. 29 • 30 • VOTE:" $ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 31 33 APPROVAL OF ' Es• 34 '.dune"7t4,°1990- 35 36 Ms.Blanchard noted some corrections to the minutes for the June 24, 1996 meeting. Page 2,Linea 6 and 37 10,and Page 3,Line 2 should be corrected"to read"8265 Spridg Lake`Road'',rather thati Silver Lake Road. 38 39 MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Trude to approve the June 24, 1996 minutes,AS AM8NDED. 40 - ; . 41 VQTT: 5 ayes 0 nays 'Matioii Carried 42 ; 43 August 12.72 6. 44 45 " MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Linke to approve the minutes of the August 12, 1996 meeting"as"presented in 46 writing, 47 48 VOTE 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 49 50 51 CONSENT AGgNDA:: 52 53 There were no items placed on the Consent Agenda for this meeting. 54 • • EDA.Meeting#26 August 12, 1996 Page 2 - , 1 PUBLIC IEA QS 3 There were no Public Hearings scheduled for this meeting. • 4 5-. .fRA BUB sst= 6 7 A. Consideration;of Authorizing Wetland-Delineation Study for Highway 10 Redevelopment Area 8 Section 7.:' 9 10 Ms,Bennett expled that Pam Sheldon and herself met with developers who have indicated=interest in 11; :"development of ptoperty directly across Hightty 10 f'om City Hail. It is her feeling that development of. 12 tbis,;ptroperty would have amajorsimpact on the i ittire direction of the redevelopment of Highway 10. She 13 noted that the property does have'a large wetland.and she has discussed the impact of.the.wetland on the, 14 possibility of developn4ent with pocky Keehn of SE11 The wettand area is,based on the National Wetland 1 S ' Inventory Maps and iota site delineation .,Mr.Keehn has suggested that the wetlandxbe delineated so that • 16 ':the city-will know how much of theproperty can actually:be developed. "Additionally,once a delineation • 17 is made,the city can review how a development will impact the city's Local Water Management Plan. - 18- 19 Ms,,Bennett suggested that the city pursue delineation of theproperty to assist M the future development • 20 marlcetfor the.pr'operty. The proposedcost is estimated to be$1,500'which wouldbe•funded through 21 eiisting taxi increment administrative revenues. • • 22 23 " MOTION/SECOND: flanlmer/Bianebard to Authorize SEE to Perform a Wetland Delineation Study for 24 Highway 10 Redevelopment Area Section 7,to be funded through existing tax increment administrative 25 revenues 26 27 VOTE: 5 ayes, 0 nays Motion Carried 28 29 " B. Consideration of Resolution No.'96.EDAw51,Authorizing the Economic,Development Commission 30 " to Work on a Request for.Proposal and Solicit Bids for the Development of'it Vision and Schematic 31<' Plan for Highway 10 Redevelopment Area Section 9.. ` 32 33 Ms:Bennett tinted;that in April the Economic Development Authority looked at different development 34 sections along 1 ighway 10 and identified three priority areas: Section 9 is located front County Road Ito 33 Silver Lake Road. 36 37 Ms.Bom ett stare#she had;met with the Economic Development Commission to strategize how to proceed • 38_ with the development of Section 9 At that meeting,they discussed whether the city should continue spot 39; development or if they should be looking at the entire section for coordinated developnnent. The 40 Economic Development Commission-would like direction from the EDA to proceed with requests for 41 proposals forthis section of Highway 10 and to develop a vision and,schematic plan:on what,could be 42 developed in that area. Ms Bennett proceeded to outline the process schedule:if the EDA authorizes the • 43 EDC to proceed as requested. 44' 45 Ms.Blanchard noted that severalplans have been Worked out Highway 10 projects in previous years., - 46 She wondered if it was feasible to complete another study at this time. 4' • • r EDA lv sting# ( ;;;),-.;.......:- 0-- t�,�t ust 1 19 0. . . ri } e,,--:,-• - 3 i C ...........4.. . , 1 ,Bennett exp---,-;•-,':;%44114.C-. - ained`t r ,tthe previous studies did not provic a inforrmation�as to vh eo ld actuallybe develotteed"in that area. This studyrwould be mote in-depth algid provi uses tbat�would tie ble:fbr e area basa(lc"...n access to the site,flow of�,'tlesigns,ete 4 F } -.•.. OTION'/SECQNI� Qulolc/ e-.10:411P,rvc A.yl7.,tylloh o,96•EDA$1,Au1`t}horizing a EconAom�c . 6.-':::7-_,.--•:•:.::::' evejopmeu'''-'440,/,,f,iss on;to W pn a fo` "`of S"'sal an 9J l fo th beve . i� lu #,ut:ofd 7 Vision and�S.hematie Pian for:-*41-" d io R evelopment•red Se on " a►esx Q nays •. �,jot(q C 1'e -,..-',..;,,;4,'''''; A,7 Aac� Qr r�ou�lde �. u �� .lad�o�'.,•-•..06*-) .,,, � y � P�'��e�Q1i��� �1'orr�lte Heol Qf�tr�e 1Located at .Spr#n� rake l oad. • , , z t�Y f �f � 1 { 4Rn � 2 ; l Ms.Een ett expl a that the c sent c t ei l # ication p� { on .z arr,� a o of s • 1 ,p;opd�iiloeted. ,8265 Ik e Road.�a reee�v ed`dem. ll- . . a ee is o nes �h s- ; �t§ tie I st cfrlthI h was rcee� Qd from I o ins the amok of$6,300. s o state�that �Y r �°r th tF� rte m i be co npleted y.8ep bo�u, I9 �r d mo.Iltlon s4 c o • ' `e ` s`411c dg#1hter st in6thei�p..roper om eve pens wit .ho ke$ o. a ,t11e land eve ► V � S �� �f �����/l � d,,.y_ �t � 4.��, - 1 :_ s 1 i .� �,� �:, l`�y. k��.,c� -•F sy � '$ !,:•,=.2.,,-..e.. S OA V s.RA�r.0 ; 'b it �. �'� �l t a' r,; t �� � %,,,11::7101,4110,,,,.. �� � � �� oh�� tQ��� � �utt�� to����������� g l��tu>s�abtaux��d�� � � + torr the.Rem►oval of ons Locate+ Sprr e�� � ,.1 z � �` 's ; °-- � Y ° t `' :x � -i r fir ;1:-'''f-.-:--14...5.• ";',‘'.2.1, O uy 0 nays. ' = o 4uµ �d ,. , . 5 u; 1�� for the City Attorney to Prepare +esolu on and ui>t ,,;.;t41- 7--:-.-;,,,:....,.--,.7, �,D� m the` . cono is De�velo�r dt A o to the---.1404#!'''''''..1-,-;''' M!undo{� I' *CIty4Cb`uuall+f`►r ���Oper�ty ; Long,City tto.rdey,noted that�a.:',A--',144)140,1.1 Notice is bot r 1°to ba published Q a 1 dopep 30 conveyed from olne lits( 4 lbttbd;;to o01ett is ose 3 32 MO'1 ON/S Co ' ' rud l ard.to a o�the rCi +Attorn y to pte.I a s6l au.as d Quit t om eb � Iola��eda �r; ��a�n le lo�fn t A� o���e:lY1[ot�xt�'c�#ea,►fly��� # the ol� 34 �-prop 35 r Sri VOTE: S ayes b nays , Motion G•amed 37. i, - - • . i 1.4)-...,;:••14/4r ' ••-..,42.i•-.4:-:--.,' µ f p- :,.(f ED& Q, ,'.2.,:',.:• ;--"".-‘17•;:•:. a J�� � ' i 3 { - F 1 f • ....-,,,••••.---- •"-.--,.,.;,-;:',-:.,-.',''.• ,. 3 epp fl eeai it I�e; o red r e 46 ' Rept df Vice�ident Elanohard No report; 46 M# y g 4 t y s,.?:„.:1::q.,-.1.,,:,. e ort O vipte Noreport. .� ,s; -f n,--..' .�+ S r i � , -.-4,4.-_,',::::%.,,•-,-•-• x F a,. T � • 7 �} .--..",-,,,,,•:---.-:=,.-•.-:-..',-.-, EDA Meeting#26 August:121996 Page 4 1 Report of Commissioners. 2 • 3 Commissioner Quick: „No report.' 4 5 (omtnissIoiner Hankner: No report. • 6 7. .Bepgr Q,t Execufive I k$gtnr Nis,Sennett noted that September 23, 1996 is not a regularly schedule 8 date tor at►-EDA meeting. Ther.efo`re,:she will`see that proper notices are posted m regard to this meeting: 10 Report o( `p9Oakrgr::No.report. 11 12 -President Linke adjourned the meeting at 9:2$p,m 13 - ' 14 l,,espectfuliy submitted, • X15 16' 17 18 ,;Tamara D Saefke -:19 Recording Sectetary . 20 21 { 22. 23 d