HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-08-1997 EDA •
:>:::::::::: ::::::>.':::`=:::':;:>::<:::::::::::;::>;;::::::; <:::::::::.:::::;:.:-.;.:: ::::......... _. T+.11`IiJ►I1l:�TD .'VSE >:::::':;:::'.,;:::<:::;:::;; ;_ :::::::.::::::»> ::`>:'` ` >�« ::; :�::>:
Authority<:A.
:._<:.:::<::;:.;:::.:::>:::.>::::.:;:::::::::.>:::;::>:.:::.>::::>: ::<:;:::>::::::>:.;:.:;::N.;.:::::;,:; * 0mbe 197......
1. CALL TO ORDER,
2. ROLL CALL President McCarty
Vice President Koopmeiners
Secretary Trude
Commissioner Quick
Commissioner Stigney
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
EDA ACTION: .ATD
111 Comments:
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
August 25, 1997 EDA Meeting Minutes
EDA ACTION: AM
Comments:
5. CONSENT AGENDA
None.
6. PUBLIC HEARING
None.
7. EDA BUSINESS
A. Consideration of Exclusive Negotiation Agreement by and between the City of
Mounds View, Mounds View Economic Development Authority and Anthony
Properties. (Staff Presenter: Cahty Bennett, Director of Economic Development)
•
EDA ACTION: ATD
Comments:
B. Authorization of Funds for Professional Services for Continuation of Engineering
Work for Signalization and Road Alignment at Edgewood Drive. Staff Report No.
EDA-97-86C (Staff Presenter: Cathy Bennett, Director of Economic
Development)
EDA ACTION: ATD
Comments:
8. REPORTS
Report of EDA Board Members:
1. President McCarty:
2. Vice President Koopmeiners: •
3. Secretary Trude:
4. Commissioners:
A. Commissioner Quick:
B. Commissioner Stigney:
5. Clerk-Administrator Whiting:
6. Executive Director Bennett:
7. Treasurer Kessel:
UNAPPROVED
• 1 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
3
4 Meeting No.42
5 August 25, 1997
6 Mounds View City Hall
7 2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View MN 55112
8 ***********************************************************************************
9
10 CALL TO ORDER
11
12 The Economic Development Authority was called to order by President McCarty at 9:10 p.m.on August 25,
13 1997.
14
15 ROLL CALL
16
17 MEMBERS PRESENT: Duane McCarty,Julie Trude,Gary Quick,Roger Stigney,Roger Koopmeiners,
18 Clerk Administrator Chuck Whiting,Housing Inspector Jennifer Bergman and City Attorney Bob Long.
19
20 OTHERS PRESENT: None
21
22 APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
23
24 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to Approve the Agenda as presented.
25
26 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
. 27
28 APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
29
30 MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Trude to approve the minutes of the July 28, 1997 meeting.
31
32 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
33
34 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve the minutes of the August 11, 1997 meeting as
35 presented in writing.
36
37 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays 1 Abstain(McCarty) Motion Carried
38
39 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve the minutes of the August 18, 1997 meeting as
40 presented in writing.
41
42 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
43
44 CONSENT AGENDA:
45
46 None
47
48 PUBLIC HEARINGS:
49
50 None
51
52 EDA BUSINESS:
411) 53
54 A. Consideration of Resolution No.97-EDA-73,Approving and Authorizing the Execution of a
55 Participation Agreement for the Redevelopment of 8265 Spring Lake Road.
EDA Meeting#42
August 25, 1997 •
Page 2
1
2 Ms.Jennifer Bergman,Housing Inspector,explained that this resolution would approve the authorize entering
3 into an agreement with Loren Hansen of Loren Hansen Construction to construct a home and minimum
4 improvements on the lot located at 8265 Spring Lake Road. The next step will be to complete the Contract for
5 Private Development which will be brought back for review by the EDA.
6
7 Commissioner Stigney asked if there are any assurances that the developer will actually be occupying the
8 residence. Ms.Bergman explained that this is one of the requirements and will be a part of the contract
9
10 MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Stigney to Approve Resolution No. 97-EDA-73,Approving and
11 Authorizing the Execution of a Participation Agreement for the Redevelopment of 8265 Spring Lake Road.
12
13 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
14
15 B. Consideration of Resolution No.97-EDA-67,Approving and Authorizing the Execution of a
16 Development Assistance Agreement with Everest Group,Ltd.,Regarding the Building"N"Project.
17
18 Ms. Cathy Bennett explained that at the May 12, 1997 EDA meeting,specific tennis for a development
19 assistance agreement were presented to the EDA and a motion was made to direct staff to prepare a
20 development assistance agreement accepting the terms as presented. Tim Nelson of the Everest Group is
21 requested that the EDA extend the term required to complete the 103,000 square foot Building N in the •
22 Mounds View Business Park from 1999 to 2002. She noted that the longer Everest waits to complete the
23 construction,the less increment will be available for him to collect on the project. The city will not incur any
24 additional risk by extending the term and the terms would be nonnegotiable at a later date. She did note that if
25 the date is extended to 2002,they will not have the opportunity to collect the increment for those three years if
26 it is not completed within the time frame. Ms.Bennett went through the negotiation terms of the agreement.
27
28 Tim Nelson of Everest Group explained that their goal is get the project built as quickly as possible,however
29 an extension would allow them additional time if the market did not warrant the completion of the building
30 prior to the 1999 deadline. He noted that for each year that the building is not done,they lose approximately
31 $150,000 of generated income so it is their desire to complete the project in a timely fashion.
32
33 Commissioner Quick asked if the have come to an agreement in regard to the amount for the Park Dedication
34 Fee. Ms.Bennett noted that this has been discussed but that there is a possibility that Everest has already paid
35 a portion of the Park Dedication Fee and staff is attempting to obtain documentation in that regard.
36
37 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to table consideration of Resolution No. 97-EDA-67 until such time as
38 the Park Dedication Fee has been determined.
39
40 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
41
42 C. Consideration of Resolution No.97-EDA-70,Appointing Economic Development Commission
43 Member to Fill Vacancy.
44
45 Ms.Bennett explained that Ms.Bev Tarhark resigned from the EDC in May and that per the Municipal Code,
46 the EDA President with the approval of a majority of the EDA Board must appoint new members for the
47 unfulfilled portion of the term. She noted that three applications were received from residents interested in 411
48 filling the vacancy.
49
EDA Meeting#42
• August 25, 1997
Page 3
1 President McCarty stated he would like to invite the candidates to the September 2, 1997 Council work session
2 so that the Council can meet them.
3
4 MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Quick to postpone consideration of Resolution No. 97-EDA-70 until the
5 September 8, 1997 EDA Meeting.
6
7 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
8
9 D. Consideration of Resolution No.97-EDA-72,Authorizing the Negotiation and Execution of a
10 Contract for Professional Services for the Development of Design Themes for Highway 10 Corridor.
11
12 Ms.Bennett explained that at the July 7, 1997 work session,staff was directed to go out for a Request for
13 Proposal for professional services to prepare a design theme for Highway 10 Corridor between Edgewood
14 Drive and Silver Lake Road. The goal of the project was to develop two or three alternatives which would
15 identify the area as the Mounds View City Center which is seen as a focal point of community activity and the
16 City's commercial core. She noted that the RFP was mailed to 15 consulting firms in the Twin Cities and
17 eight proposals were received;four were chosen for interviews by members of the Planning Commission.
18 They were able to narrow it down to two firms,SRF Consulting Group and Hoisington Koegler Group,
19 however they have not been able to come up with a recommendation for the EDA Board. Ms.Bennett briefly
20 discussed the advantages of each,but wondered if it may be advisable to get a task force together to interview
• 21 the final two firms.
22
23 MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Stigney to table the Consideration of Resolution No. 97-EDA-72.
24
25 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
26
27 REPORTS:
28
29 Report of EDA Board Members:
30
31 Report of President McCarty: No report.
32
33 Report of Vice President Koopmeiners: No report.
34
35 Report of Secretary Trude: No report.
36
37 Report of Commissioners:
38
39 Commissioner Quick: No report.
40
41 Commissioner Stigney: No report.
42
43 Report of Executive Director: No report.
44
45 Report of Treasurer: No report.
46
• 47 Report of Attorney: No report.
48
49 The August 25, 1997 meeting of the EDA was adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
EDA Meeting#42
•
August 25, 1997
Page 4
1 Respectfully submitted,23 jawiete/tet
4 Tamara D. Saefke
5 Recording Secretary
6
•
•
c
Item No. 7B
Staff Report No. A- 7-
Meeting Date ____2:12z_
Type of Business pqg
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
Mounds View CA:Consent Agenda;EDAB:EDA Business
Economic Development Authority
Staff Report
To: Economic Development Authority
From: Cathy Bennett,Director of Economic Development
Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Authorization of Funds for Professional
forContinuation of the Edgewood Drive Signaliza io n/Rea]gnm nt
Date of Report: September 4, 1997
Summary:
Staff is seeking direction from the Council and authorization to proceed with the
engineering analysis needed to continue the process to obtain authorization for a signal
Drive and to identify road allbackground traffic
that will be impacted. Staff would recommend cess and
that the funds needed parking layout f City Hall and adjoining Edgewood
taken from tax increment dollars allocated to the Highway 10 redevelopmenteed with thiswork be les
P
Background:
• Mounds View was one of four cities to participate in a design course sponsored
Minnesota this spring. The focus in Mounds View was on design solutions for by thewy10 University of
corridor. The course resulted in the development of a"Ring Road"concept which Highway 10
local level road system on either side of Highway 10 between Edgewood Driveh would provide a
One of the key links in the Ring Road is through the O'Neil and County Road I.
Lake Road, County Road H2, and Highway 10. e property which is located between Long
intersection at Edgewood Drive and Highway 10 and a new founk r waconn intersection signalized
Drive and Long Lake Road.
Y coon at Mounds View
The City Council approved the use of tax increment funds on July 14th to complete several tasks
P
related to reviewing the possible implementation of the Ring Road Concept through the O'Neil
property and the creation of a signalized intersection at Edgewood Drive and Highway10
approval of these tasks were needed to evaluate if it was possible to gain preliminarysThe
MnDot for pursueing the Ring Road Concept. These tasks included: PP°rt from
• developing a proposed road alignment and intersection design
discussion purposed with MnDot and Wetland Agencies. -this is only a concept for
• calculating traffic generation and distribution, so we know how much traffic wi
through the signalized intersection ll flow
• preparing a signal sequencing study
• preparing a contour map of the wetland
• preparing the application to the federal, state and local agencies for crossing t he wetland
City of Mounds View Staff Report
September 4, 1997
Page 2 •
To continue with the process to obtain approvals from MnDot for the proposed signal and
preliminary realignment additional work will need to be done in the following areas:
• a Signal Justification Report(SFR) is required for written approval from MnDot. This report
will also help MnDot in determining the possibility of providing funds for the signal. SEH
indicated that it is possible that MnDot would fund 50%of the signal.
• formal preliminary Road Alignment Plan will need to be developed for MnDot to obtain any
cost sharing commitments and to allow Anthony Properties to complete their final plans for
submission to Planning Commission as part of the development review process.
• submission of Cooperative Agreement Program to allow MnDot to estimate cost sharing as
part of their 1999 fiscal year. If approved funds are available in July of 1998.
City engineers from SEH have done excellent work in gaining preliminary verbal support from
MnDot for the signal. They have prepared a work program to continue with obtaining approvals for
an estimated fee of$11,900. Because time is of the essence to meet MnDot budget deadlines and
future construction season time table SEH is already working on the SJR. They need to submit the
SJR information to MnDot by mid September so they have adequate time to review prior to
submission as part of the Cooperative Agreement.
Continuing with this process is critical to both the City and Anthony Properties. With the increased
traffic and community activity that will be generated by the Community Center the signal would
provide a much safer crossing and smoother flow of traffic. If the Council wishes to proceed with
•
the ring road concept integrating that portion into the Theater project is critical. Anthony Properties
has been very patient and supportive of the City's vision. Anthony Properties has already missed
their goal of opening the Theater in the summer of 1998. They now need to open in the fall of 1998.
There is no doubt that an intersection will provide value to Anthony Properties but a road through
their development is seen as more of a City benefit since Anthony Properties will be losing a
developable commercial parcel. The signal also provides benefit to the H2 neighborhood in that
there will be less of a tendency for traffic from the Theater to use H2 if they are able to travel west
on 10 directly from the Theater.
By proceeding with this work plan the City is not approving in any way the realignment or signal.
Part of the additional task for SEH is to evaluate the costs of such a project. In discussion with Glen
Van Wormer he noted that it is possible to change the realignment of the road and location of the
signal as proposed. I will have a memo from Glen explaining the reasons behind the alternatives that
they are working from for the meeting on safe crossing and traffic flow. Even if the ring road concept
does not meet by the increased
the
needs of the community the signal would provide
traffic generated by the Community Center and the Theater/Office development.
Reccomendation:
Staff is requesting authorization to use Tax Incrment Funds in an amount not to exceed$12,000 for
the c l%tin a ion a work on this project.
`S C •
Cathy B ennevg irector of Economic Development
09/04/97 15:15 FAX 612 490 2150 SEH ST. PAUL Z 002/004
r
•
6418 NORMANDY LANE.SUITE 100,MADISON, WI 53719 608 2742020 800 732-4382 FAX 608 274-2026
ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION
August 22, 1997 RE: Edgewood Drive
Highway 10 Intersection
Mounds View,Minnesota
SEH No. P-MOUND9708.00
Ms.Cathy Bennett
Economic Development Director
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View,MN 55111-1499
Dear Cathy:
We have completed most of the work associated with the traffic study at the Highway 10 and Edgewood
Drive intersection. We evaluated the signal coordination along Highway 10 in much more detail than we
initially anticipated. This was in response to Mn/DOT questions and concerns.
At our August 6 meeting with Mn/DOT, the traffic representatives agreed that the Edgewood Drive signal
fits into the Highway 10 coordinated signal system.This is a change from the initial Mn/DOT reaction that
there should be no more traffic signals installed along Highway 10.At the August 6 meeting, they did ask
for some more documentation which we have since calculated and provided. •
We have also developed the concepts for the alignment for the Edgewood Drive relocation and for the theater
parking lot.Access to the parcel created by the relocation of Edgewood Drive north of Highway 10 was also
discussed and evaluated.Throughout the process, we have conversed and met with both the City staff and
developer.The only item left in our work program is the preparation of a summary report.
To continue with the process of relocating Edgewood Drive and installing a traffic signal, three basic areas
still need to be addressed.
Signal Justification
Mn/DOT will not formally approve the traffic signal installation and commit to funding without a Signal
Justification Report(SJR).This report provides basic information and documents the justification for the
signal.Once this document is approved and signed,the traffic signal installation is virtually assured,pending
funding.We have already begun to prepare the SJR since it will take some time to review at Mn/DOT and
the City is on a tight time schedule.
Road Alignment
• Our alignment to date is a concept only.The developer will need additional details to develop a final parking
lot layout and access designs on the south side of the road.Mn/DOT will need a formal preliminary plan for
all the work that they will participate in.The City and the developer need an alignment of the north side so
that they can plan for the relocation of the parking lot and its entrances and determine the amount of room
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC Sr PAUL,MN MINNEAPOLIS,MN ST CLOUD:MN CHIPPEWA FALLS. 'NI LAKE COUNTY,IN
09/04/97 15:16 FAX 612 490 2150 SEH ST. PAUL 01004/004
•
Ms.Cathy Bennett
August 22, 1997
Page 3
Schedule
We are aware of the City's desire to complete this entire process and gain the necessary approvals so that
construction can be completed by the anticipated opening of the O'Neil property.We have already had initial
contacts with Mn/DOT regarding the relocated intersection of Highway 10 and Edgewood Drive, and
preliminary alignments of Edgewood Drive and the proposed frontage road have been completed.
As soon as we receive approval from the City, we can begin work on the preliminary design, wetland
impacts, and the cost estimate and finish the SJR. We estimate that this work can be done in three to four
weeks.Agency approval from Mn/DOT, the DNR,and the Rice Creek Watershed may take anywhere from
30 to 90 days; however, a preliminary answer could probably be obtained in approximately 30 days.
Cost Estimate
Gam( We can perform the tasks outlined in the above work program on an hourly fee basis with a cost estimate of
• Would you kindly review the work program, schedule, and cost estimate presented above. If you are in
agreement,would you please sign both copies of this letter proposal and return one copy to us as our formal
notice to proceed with the work.If you have any questions or need any additional information,please contact
me at 490-2045 or John Hagen at 490-2195.
Respectively submitted,
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
...edind/gedir/711/x/
Glen Van Wormer
Manager,Transportation Department
tlo
Enclosure
F:aedmuk.muuDmtitAi9 rrum..d70B.k,
Accepted this day of , 1997.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
By:
Title:
09/08/97 MON 11:11 FAX 612 490 2150 SEH 444 MOUNDS VIEW2002�' ?vjo (�,: �c 14dd� ,v� it) cam► �'t.6. ry
3535_,,
VADNAlS CENTER DRIVE 200 SEH f CENTER,ST.PAUL.MN 55110 6124 9- 8' 57
600 3 `'
ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEER/NG
IIIENVIRONMENTAL • TRA/vsAORTAnON
September 8, 1997
RE: Mounds View, Minnesota
Edgewood Drive
Highway 10 Intersection
SEH No.P-MOtND9708.00
Ms. Cathy Bennett
Economic Development Director
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112-1499
Dear Cathy:
As a follow-up to our August 22, 1997 letter and work program,and to questions which
have arisen in the
discussion of the program,we offer the following comments.
The location of the revised Edgewood Drive intersection is primarily a function of the theater
design and the development of the loop road.It is very desirable to have the loop road connection
fromng lot
• Lake Road,and the loop road connection from relocated Edgewood Drive, intersect northwest
parking lot on the south side Highway ]0.If the roads intersect too far thetonnection Long
in frontkithe theater, eg tog way 10.I and potentially intersection othe theateruld
east, the would be
9
otential! creating confusion.
The location, based on that criteria, is approximately half way between the Highway
Long Lake Road and County Road H2. This location is beneficial in fittinginto
coordination sequence. Although notSh Y t 0 intersections with
comments was positive because theintersectionOwas at the midrequiring -point it
int located half wa the traffic signal
Thus,there are two reasons for the specific location on Edgewood Y, one of their first
and minimizing are impareasons
and maximizingspafi operationaltionbetween two adjacent intersections.
g sod Drive; uequal eacinh between intersections
benefits on the south side of the roadway.
The original concept for the extension of Edgcwood Avenue on the north side had two
in the roadway in an effort to miss the Mounds View City very severe curves
from an operational standpoint and did not line up with the bestP location lfe the curves were unacceptable
theater entrance.
The current conceptual alignment shows a curve for Edgewood Drive which provides a vcry
as well as good intersections at Highway I0 and at Bronson Drive. It
well functioning City Hall parking lot.
good operating
also appeared to provide a
The development of the preliminary plan for the roadways, as outlined in the work ire
refine the alignment. Some options that will be considered include increasing the angle at
intersection and increasing the curve of the road to see if more of the CityHallp gra' will further
efficiently used. Equally important in the developmentthe Highway 10
parking lots to the saved anda
of the preliminary plan are access to City Hall
ELLIOTT
•TELL/orrR/CKSONWO MINNEAPOLIS.MN
ST,CLOUD,MN CHIPPEWA PALLS, W!
MADISON, W! LAKE COUNTY.IN
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
09/08/97 MON 11:12 FAX 612 490 2150 SEH 44.+ MOUNDS VIEW a OOa
Ms.Cathy Bennett
September 8, 1997
Page 2 •
parking lot, access to the proposed new parcel to the southeast,
development will require a full survey which will provide a base layout enablin usCoto b er review the
Center. The
options and the impacts.
ng us to bette
If you have any other questions or need further information on the work program
free to call at any time, p gram or the concept, please feel
Sincerely,
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
jS,b7/122Qill' �h.�,s,/
Glen Van Wormer, P.E.
Manager, Transportation Department
tlo
R OC\M41U \TMSUUMPTLSI179AmOt1ND7oSIT2
•
•
09/08/97 15:35 FAX 612 490 2150 SEH ST. PAUL [Z1001/004 ,
.. )3C1CUTA4 toe ,b -'iq-
1 -7. 8 .
-7.FAX TRANSMITTAL
— - .
a9S3SVmP s CENTER DIM '
CENTER
SST.PAL 10
612 4804000 o FIELD St7
i FILE h0:
�4904160 FAX DA
3264065
71,/f?
05909eAXERROADFROA,t Glen V1lI1e,---
•
SLATE 550
urtierceig,NV 6f3.15 4-
612 891-6501 TOTAL PAGES:
800 794-6757 tAss+�+0�+•d...rl
612 891-11e8 FAX
0 URGENTI/1�.. 36'� �j
• p ti3ti MIME . ATT174770Ia. t 17neiF
P.D.BOX 1717
ST.CLOW.10156302-1717 �j
612 2524740 800 Ca/ORGANtZ4TJON: MO an s 4u)
4122514750 FAX 78 4.— r�atron+E 1 OZ
FAX NO:
°
CliPPEWA FALLS.11154T19 susjEcr. * celhe i v 00 d 4fitt-nye__
715 7204200 .
0 800 472-5881 REMARKS:
715 724-6300 FAX
Ira(.A.//."..5
I) 1-hi di OP C.4'7i�1'--- 1'�.u1.Yse Curvier die -4raoch t'
f
SUITE 120
1,lftdSOH W163719 3 f' n o 1 rri( aL 6/7paCh 1
608 274-2020 ue S 57�7�1
800 n2-4362• 6122744026FAX a) o111d e.0>?eep-i- 1 b Gr . .,,rrr
02001 CLINE AVEME K. " OP; p01-4117- la f r nviiv 1201-; Lied
GRIFFITHN41319 3) 3y c.87? Lo e or Uen1,
219 838-7097 /
218 848-7088 FAX fr(L 1 434? xeu/seiL___,
31 tranaetrlsadert was not received property,Owe contact the sender at the phone number above.
•
We are
Q Sending original by mall )(Sending by FAX only 0 Sending as requested
For your
❑ lnfom do 'Remnds 0 Review end aommenl 0 Approval
• a Action ❑ Distribution 0 Revision and resubmits(
WE REQUEST A RESPONSE FROM YOU 8Y:
•
M�/�� � C17195rdt=d�nr8M'p1°yer
I 09/08/97 15:35 FAX 612 490 2150 SEH ST. PAUL z002/004
•
rd• �
t+
ski i; h12-.,' .F.J+ g
` 4.?..'
r • •' ..,,,..,,,!..,....,1....r
'.11,.. E' ROAD ' <:_ •;.,.3
y.. -T . :F-—'w `-- . _+, y ++l * _+ -A
` .— —... -
'
1 4. + .•+ + + .+ , +' .4 + + 1 4 i.— 4 -. /
+ + i. + + •4 + 4. + + 4 T + i 41 t +
t•' + + i +". + t -+ . t 1- 4 + + 1 i J •. '/.,
+ + •• + + .a +' + + + li I + + /
'
+ + i + + + +'. 4 + 4 4 i 4- 14 + !• /
a 4 + + 4 + +.' t + , //
- 1 * i + + + 4. + + •7 1 *, i+ + I.
--_—.r ,-..-,.-*--•.r--..+*i +•t.. t--.•+' -+ +.- 4 . . . 44 •1 •.i.......x....).. ... ... .1 4. .}. .-j- —�-
4. + + ts. ...4.4 1 ,
t , _+ 4 + t + T N \ /
."*"../ss.• +• '+ "..t + + " ' // 0
in
ik,-..s3,.( -71,r,--p.,f,,,, rip
•
.145'es:. `Eof a �-r•� Li I •
ili,
14 •..;-:C45` a r? r-ti y
i:Ki
. _ :,:...,„ , ....,, O\
//
j�° 1S• I1 ' / '<"
/ '
-
I •
, RI . %
rz
j rn r
y t amu,
)1.
1 ,/la-s\\>
f1. /
I
/ \
j N/1
7 • • •L
_ (\\"\-------M--, %..-----j•
•
2631-41
5,1
1
09/08/97 15:36 FAX 612 490 2150 SEH ST. PAUL Z003/004
k II/ Uf :DL rm wym 14% ..:-- /.^�_ \, /
cANNIMMINSIENI
1
7 j
SI '.. /7.: —
' •X30• \ , /</%/
.ate ` , i. /
IIIP */ \,\%..i
.4., .•.
...
. . 4, ,
\ Ns'\.. ."...„
11141114411\ 40%
s
•
\'
_ ‘ it
../Amb. , - ' N `....lir '
L * 44 •
1 r �, _ � ‘
.rte - 11 ri i
i
;;t I • rLim
w
7.TJI
"7J/ i
.. - ..•� ��� i ,~
r.b
1
•�.
,2 n-...��+.� a + - • �r_� v 404.- _7.._ -. r.�
• ,
09/08/97 15:36 FAX 612 490 2150 SEH ST. PAUL 1004/004
PRELIMINARY EDGEWOOD AVENUE
AND FRONTAGE ROAD ALIGNMENTS 0.
1
W
Q
Ni1
Q
r .
o
LIJ
1N /I -..--..'n --. --....... , -. - . .........
1 .PAR=A \\ `, •` / N
•
lir
. • / .. V t/ . /
�I s• \• til, n
3Z ' / CP ii4 IL
- -ems • - �✓ 1 .
Sib
I ��
I• . . , " ' $ 4 MaL Ji I 1 eept
, . ,
t? . . . .• . • _ .. / : A : ,,.4i.- -.:" . iiit.',....P-:.iit--
r;__ -'L, _ 1
x ( SCALE: 1 =2C
❑ II r - ' 7 A
F,:
Nic1441
• nf�OyE r pn♦ OATS }• • ^ --.
•r--- 1--No , ... - .
OI r . E rk rtiovc N. 12140T IN
J i• a Rie•Ki UT'
BO
I I • I ` JL \
.1r " • 1 a '
•
I . +1.F. -. + ` V'
QI"IM MD*. comae.-_ - - ' i t
.....-- : IlEirtaL01% PAIR OW, I _ 16.11r.er.41% : , •.
1. egb coxa eli 1 aedti ���ra y�� �- -1 . ii ri . . .
•
coon 1r RoAr7 H-2
Arrgal
07/22/