Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1998/06/22 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY, June 22, 1998 7:00 PM 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL: McCarty, Stigney, Koopmeiners, Quick, Gunn 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES •, A. June 8, 1998 City Council Meeting Minutes 4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS none 5. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Just and Correct Claims B. 1998-1999 License Renewals- See Staff Reports 1. 1998-1999 Contractor Licenses 2. 1998-1999 Garbage Hauler Licenses 3. 1998-1999 Restaurant Licenses 6. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR A. Citizens: Before speaking must give their full name and address for the minutes. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. 7:00 PM Public Hearing Regarding On-Sale Intoxicating and Off-Sale Intoxicating License Renewals B. 7:05 PM Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution No. 5242, a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Accessory Building at 2085 Oakwood Drive. C. 7:10 PM Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution No. 5243, a Resolution Approving a PUD Amendment to the Silverview Estates PUD and Development Review for a Senior Cooperative Housing Development D. Receive and approve the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the City of Mounds View as of and for the year Ended December 31, 1997. Report Attached (Dave Hinnenkamp from Kern DeWenter Viere, Ltd. to be in attendance). E. Approve Resolution 5248 Approving 1997 Budget Transfers, Designations and Carryovers(Presenter Bruce Kessel, Finance Director). F. Consider Motion Retaining the Monetary Limits on Statutory Tort Limits established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04 as Recommended by City Attorney Long (Presenter Bruce Kessel, Finance Director). G. Authorization to Enter Into an Option to Purchase the Midland Videen Property and To Send Out a Request for Proposals. H. Update on Edgewood Drive Realignment and Signalization.(Representatives From SEH will be Presenting a Report). I. Discussion on Community Center HVAC Change Order J. Consideration of Resolution 5245 Approving the Labor Agreement Contract with Public Works and Parks Maintenance Bargaining Unit. 8. REPORTS 9. Special Council Work Session: Tuesday,June 23, 6:00 PM Next Council Work Session: Monday, July 6, 6:00 PM Next Council Meeting: Monday,July 13, 7:00 PM 10. Adjournment Page 1 UNAPPROVED June 8, 1998 Mounds View City Council PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting June 8, 1998 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:02 p.m., on June 8, 1998. 2. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor McCarty, Council Members Gunn, Koopmeiners, Quick, and Stigney. ALSO PRESENT: Chuck Whiting, Clerk Administrator; Cari Schmidt, Assistant to the City Administrator; Rick Jopke, Community Development Director; Jim Ericson, Planning Associate; Bob Long, City Attorney; Dave Hix, Recording Secretary. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: A. May 26, 1998 City Council Meeting Minutes Mayor McCarty asked for additions and/or corrections to the May 26, 1998 City Council Meeting Minutes. MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Gunn to approve the May 26, 1998 City Council Meeting Minutes as submitted. VOTE: Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion Carried. 4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS Administrator Whiting offered the following addition to and deletion from the meeting agenda: PagetUNi00QPiEfl qgJ G,,June 8, 1998 Mounds View City Council Add under the "CLOSED SESSION" another briefing on the Golf Course Litigation. Delete Item 7D, Consideration of Community Center HVAC Change Order. The information needed to make a report was not ready for the meeting. MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Koopmeiner to approve the Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion Carried 5. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor McCarty read into the record Item 5C as follows: "There will be a Public Hearing set at 7:05 p.m., Monday, June 22, 1998, to consider Resolution No. 5242, a Resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit for an oversized accessory building at 2085 Oakwood Drive." Mayor McCarty read into the record Item 5D as follows: "There will be a Public Hearing set at 7:10 p.m., Monday, June 22, 1998, to consider Resolution No. 5243, a Resolution approving a PUD amendment to the Silverview Estates PUD and development review for a senior cooperative housing development." MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Gunn to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted. VOTE: Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion Carried 6. RESIDENTS' REQUEST AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR Mayor McCarty asked if there was anybody wishing to address the Council on items not on the agenda. Wendy Marty, 2626 Louisa Avenue, made reference to a discussion that had taken place at the City Council's work session held the week of May 26, 1998. At that meeting there was a discussion concerning the City's policy in regards to filing communications from the citizens that are mailed into the City offices. It was noted that these communications were being kept in several different places and at times several different departments. This filing policy has lead to the misplacing and loss of letters in regards to the Red Oaks No. 3 Concept Plan that had been submitted by the Harstad Company. The City Administrator acknowledged receipt of the letters but had no explanation for the missing letters that Ms. Marty had referenced. Ms. Marty resubmitted to each Council Member a copy of each of the 40 letters that allegedly had been lost. Copies were also given to The City Administrator to place in the City files. Copies were also left for each Planning Commission member, these copies were left with Chuck Whiting to distribute to the Planning Commission. ti NA ppR 0 II Pm* YY Page 3 ti June 8, 1998 Mounds View City Council Ms. Marty stated she had personal knowledge of two petitions with at least 500 signatures regarding the O'Neil Property. These petitions had been submitted in the spring of 1997, they were both missing from the City files. This was discover upon inspection of the O'Neil files which were available as public record in the City offices. Ms. Marty requested that the City take steps to maintain a better filing system. Administrator Whiting apologized for the confusion that had been created by the City's filing policy. He stated the filing system has been placed under review and is currently being reorganized to help improve the services that are available to the City staff and City residents. Mayor McCarty stated that the City has recognized there is a better way to keep records. A central approach tying all of the City's departments together is being worked on. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution No. 5241, a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit and a License for a Residential Dog Kennel at 2359 Pinewood Circle. Mayor McCarty closed the regular Council meeting and opened the floor to the public for their comments. Associate Ericson gave his report as follows: Scott and Marcia Dumonceaux, 2359 Pinewood Circle, were applying for a Conditional Use Permit for a residential dog kennel. City Code requires a CUP for ownership of three to four dogs. The applicants own four dogs. As a condition of licensing for these animals, it is required that the animal owners obtain signatures of approval from more than 50 percent of the residents within 500 feet of the property proposing the kennel. The applicants had received 30 signatures which fulfilled the requirement. The Planning Commission, at its meeting on May 20. 1998, voted unanimously to approve a resolution recommending approval of this CUP request to the City Council. A dog nuisance background check was done with the City Police Department. There were two reports of barking dogs that had been turned in against this property. Based on the information gathered, and the analysis of the CUP criteria, Staff and the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Resolution 5241, a resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit and license for a dog kennel for Scott and Marcia Dumonceaux, located at 2359 Pinewood Circle, with stipulations. Charles Mectel, 5533 St. Michael Street, spoke in opposition of granting the CUP and license. Mr. Mectel stated he was one of the parties making the police report in regards to barking dogs. W Page 4 i C 1 Fa: �\ June 8, 1998 Mounds View City Council He stated there had been a misprint in the New Brighton Bulletin, which had reported the Public Hearing as being scheduled for Tuesday May 8, 1998. Rod Melbo, 5601 St. Michael Street, spoke in opposition of granting the CUP and licensing. He, too, stated his reason as being the barking of the dogs. He stated he has never made a complaint to the Police Department. Harold Grady, 5545 St. Michael, spoke in favor of granting the CUP and license. He stated the dogs are provoked by squirrels and other dogs in the neighborhood and he suggested that the City regulate the wild life in the neighborhood as a solution to keeping the dogs quiet. Marcia Dumonceaux, 2359 Pinewood Circle, stated that she and her family had made a concerted effort to keep the dogs quiet. She told the Council that she would be willing to work with, not only Mr. Mectel, but all of the neighbors to help keep all of the dogs in the neighborhood as quiet as possible, considering that dogs do occasionally need to bark. Barbara Liukkonen, 2367 Pinewood Circle, spoke in favor of granting the CUP and license. She agreed that the applicant's dogs are provoked by other dogs and wild life in the neighborhood. Ms. Liukkonen told the Council the applicants are very conscientious about keeping the dogs as quiet as possible. Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting of the City Council for consideration of the matter. MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Koopmeiners to approve Resolution 5241, a resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit and license for a dog kennel for Scott and Marcia Dumonceaux, located at 2359 Pinewood Circle, with stipulations. Stigney suggested that one of the stipulations should read that the City Council can review and revoke the CUP and license at any given time, if complaints continue to be filed with the City. Associate Ericson pointed out to the Council, item No. 4 under the stipulations list, this was one of the conditions of approval as written in the Resolution 5241. He added that the City Council, as one of its functions, has the right to review and revoke, with reason, any CUP that it grants. VOTE: Ayes - 4 Nays - 1(Quick) Motion Carried Mayor McCarty reiterated the City's position on granting the CUP and the license: The CUP and the license can be reviewed and revoked if complaints about the dogs continue. He urged the applicants and all of the neighbors to work with each other in an effort to control all of the dogs in their neighborhood. Page 5 UNA ppR n vED „, June 8, 1998 Mounds View City Council B. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 617, an Ordinance Amending Title 1100, Chapters 1114 and 1115 of the Municipal Zoning Code relating to the permitted uses within the B-3 Highway Business, and B-4, Regional Business Zoning Districts. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve and waive the second reading of Ordinance 617. ROLL CALL VOTE: Council Member Quick Aye Council Member Stigney Aye Council member Koopmeiners Aye Council Member Gunn Aye Mayor McCarty Aye Motion Carried(5-0) C. Consideration of Resolution No 5244, Changing Election Polling Location to Edgewood Middle School. MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Quick to approve Resolution No. 5244. VOTE: Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion Carried Administrator Whiting asked Ms. Schmidt to state the dates of the filings and of the elections. Assistant Schmidt stated the filing dates for local offices are July 7-21 and Tuesday September 15, as the date of the primary election. Tuesday November 3, is the general election date. Koopmeiner questioned the dates. Ms. Schmidt told the Council she would verify the dates and forward the information to the City Council. City Attorney Long stated the Charter states the deadline for filing for City Offices as being "no earlier than 70 days nor later than 56 days before any municipal election." He stated this would include a special and a primary election. The Mayor agreed, stating the Charter is in compliance with state law on local elections. Ms. Schmidt stated she had received the dates from the Minnesota Ballot Bulletin. She had been in contact with the State in regards to changing the polling location. The State verified the dates as stated, she said. Again she told the Council she would verify the dates and let the Council know if they are to be changed from what was stated. UNAP PR OV Page 6 June 8, 1998 Mounds View City Council E. Work Session Format Approval Mayor McCarty stated the issue as being whether or not to continue televising the work sessions over the communities cable access channel. One side of the issue is that televising stifles input and in other cases it leaves the City at a disadvantage in that proprietary information, that might be in the best interest of the residents to keep in house, is made public. No specific resolution was on the table, rather the opportunity to offer a motion relative to the continuing or not continuing of the cable broadcast of work sessions. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiner to cease televising the broadcasting of the City Council work sessions over the City's cable access channel. Stigney voiced opposition to the motion stating it is the citizens' right to have access to City government by whatever means that are available. The funding for the televising does not come from the general fund but comes from a cable franchising fee, so money is not an issue. Mayor McCarty agreed, but added the troublesome part of the issue is that the City Council could not keep vital information private to the City. There has to be an opportunity to discuss issues in defense of the City's residents without having the wrong parties get the information too quickly. Quick stated as an example,"if you're dealing with burglars you don't broadcast that information over the TV set". Stigney suggested screening the agenda and not discussing things that would be a detriment to the City. Quick stated all work sessions are open to the public. Stigney responded, the theory behind cable is to save the citizens the trip, make it easier for them to be involved in the workings of the City government. Rob Marty, 2626 Louisa Avenue, spoke in favor of having the City Council Work session televised. He stated the televised work sessions helped him find out about the Harstad project that was being proposed for his neighborhood. MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Stigney to table consideration of televising the City Council work session until further notice. VOTE: Ayes - 3 Nays - 2(Koopmeiners, Quick) Page 7 UNAPPROVED June 8, 1998 Mounds View City Council Motion Carried. 8. REPORTS Council Member Stigney had no report. Council Member Gunn told the Council the Pinewood Playground will be closed this weekend for resurfacing of the parking lot. She stated the volunteer work force is in need five more laborers to help with the resurfacing process. Council Member Koopmeiners had no report. Council Member Quick had no report. Mayor McCarty had no report Lyle Nelson, 2357 Sherwood Road, asked the City to review its nuisance parking Code. He had received a letter from the City stating his car was parked illegally because it wasn't being parked on a hard surface. Mr. Nelson stated he felt if he had an automobile that was legally licensed and was carrying insurance he should be able to park it any were on his property. Administrator Whiting told Mr. Nelson that the letters were sent out to get rid of nuisance vehicles,"Junkers", that were illegally parked in backyards, driveways etc. He thanked Mr. Nelson for his opinion and stated those opinions would be taken into consideration when letters are sent out again. Administrator Whiting told the Council that the City is in compliance with all of the applicable state regulations regarding the grant, the building, and the prevailing wage issue for the Community Center Project. Administrator Whiting told the Council that the Council, minus Council Member Gunn, would be in Duluth the week of June 15, for the League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference. City Attorney Long stated the timing of the filing for City offices needs to be reverified. He stated he would check to see if the State Legislature requires filing dates to be uniform and override charters as is the case with election dates. 9. Next Council Work Session: July 6, 1998 - 6:00 p.m. Next Council Meeting: June 22, 1998 - 7:00 p.m. 10. ADJOURNMENT Page 8 UNAPPROvED June 8, 1998 Mounds View City Council MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Stigney to adjourn the meeting at 8:05 p.m. VOTE: Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion Carried Respectfully submitted, Dave Hix Recording Secretary CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS,the City Council of Mounds View,pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed the claim numbers: 10413 through 10531 in the amount of $ 58,569.29 10397 through 10412 in the amount of $ 24,628.96 TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 83,198.25 and has found said claims to be just and correct. It was moved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached list of claims dated 06/09/98 by the vote ayes nayes Mayor Clerk-Administrator Date: 06/04/1998 Time: 11:39:00 Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 1 City of Mounds View FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Save As: Council Ranges: Fund: (A) Dept Id: (A) Program: (A) Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Schedule Journal #: (R) 159 - 159 Bank #: (A) Cash #: (A) Payroll Check Dates: (A) Options: Print: F Sort: V Report Format: 2 Print Ranges/Options: Y # of copies: 1 Process Payroll: N Total By Account: Y Page on Sort: N Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Amount 10508 Action Press, Inc. 100-4180-3430 190.42 10508 Action Press, Inc. 100-4180-3430 126.82 10508 Action Press, Inc. 100-4180-3430 185.85 Total for Vndr Action Press, In 503.09* 10509 Affordable Sanitation 100-4360-4030 862.65 Total for Vndr Affordable Sanit 862.65* 10510 Airtouch 100-4130-3100 88.81 Total for Vndr Airtouch 88.81* 10514 American Planning Assn 100-4180-1600 30.00 Total for Vndr American Plannin 30.00* 10516 Amerigas Propane L. P. 100-1410 3,474.94 Total for Vndr Amerigas Propane 3,474.94* 10511 Anchor Paper Co. 100-4460-1600 58.34 Total for Vndr Anchor Paper Co. 58.34* 10512 Ancom Communications, 100-4200-2400 68.90 10512 Ancom Communications, 100-4200-7030 154.18 Total for Vndr Ancom Communicat 223.08* 10521 Beisswengers 100-4462-1600 9.53 10521 Beisswengers 100-4360-1600 13.74 10521 Beisswengers 100-4360-1600 46.71 10521 Beisswengers 100-4360-1600 100.09 10521 Beisswengers 100-4360-1600 22.35 10521 Beisswengers 100-4472-1600 13.83 10521 Beisswengers 100-4360-1600 4.69 10521 Beisswengers 100-4460-1600 5.94 10521 Beisswengers 100-4460-1600 28.58 10521 Beisswengers 100-4360-1600 35.08 Date: 06/04/1998 Time: 11:39:01 Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 2 City of Mounds View FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Account # Amount 10521 Beisswengers 100-4360-1600 15.08 Total for Vndr Beisswengers 295.62* 10525 Brock White Company, L 100-4470-7050 271.58 Total for Vndr Brock White Comp 271.58* 10526 Bumper to Bumper 100-4462-1220 -135.20 10526 Bumper to Bumper 100-4465-1220 82.76 10526 Bumper to Bumper 100-4462-1220 230.16 10526 Bumper to Bumper 100-4470-7050 16.21 Total for Vndr Bumper to Bumper 193.93* 10528 Capitol Communications 100-4460-5130 31.07 10528 Capitol Communications 100-4460-5110 150.00 Total for Vndr Capitol Communic 181.07* 10529 Carburetion & Turbo Sy 100-4360-1220 138.06 Total for Vndr Carburetion & Tu 138.06* 10599 City of St. Paul 100-4472-1600 23.42 Total for Vndr City of St. Paul 23.42* 10531 Copy Equipment, Inc. 100-4180-1600 52.28 Total for Vndr Copy Equipment, 52.28* 10552 David Hix 100-4180-3030 56.25 Total for Vndr David Hix 56.25* 10517 Earl F. Andersen & Ass 100-4360-1210 94.81 Total for Vndr Earl F. Andersen 94.81* 10537 Elan Financial Service 100-4130-3630 145.48 Total for Vndr Elan Financial S 145.48* 10538 Erickson's Newmarket 100-4160-1140 28.25 Total for Vndr Erickson's Newma 28.25* 10539 Executone 100-4160-5130 489.00 Total for Vndr Executone 489.00* 10541 Fricke & Sons 100-4470-1600 -24.00 Total for Vndr Fricke & Sons -24.00* 10543 Friendly Chevrolet GEO 100-4462-1220 41.51 10543 Friendly Chevrolet GEO 100-4465-1220 19.98 10543 Friendly Chevrolet GEO 100-4462-1220 17.47 10543 Friendly Chevrolet GEO 100-4462-1220 11.29 10543 Friendly Chevrolet GEO 100-4462-1220 16.99 Total for Vndr Friendly Chevrol 107.24* Date: 06/04/1998 Time: 11:39:01 Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 3 City of Mounds View FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Account # Amount 10556 J. C. Auto Supply & Ma 100-4465-1220 36.14 Total for Vndr J. C. Auto Suppl 36.14* 10550 Jim Hatch Sales Compan 100-4470-1230 161.08 Total for Vndr Jim Hatch Sales 161.08* 10557 Kennedy & Graven 100-4160-3010 -60.00 10557 Kennedy & Graven 100-4160-3010 1,763.00 10557 Kennedy & Graven 100-4160-3010 210.00 10557 Kennedy & Graven 100-4160-3010 969.90 10557 Kennedy & Graven 100-4160-3010 121.66 10557 Kennedy & Graven 100-4160-3010 31.66 Total for Vndr Kennedy & Graven 3,036.22* 10560 League of Minnesota Ci 100-4200-0400 180.23 Total for Vndr League of Minnes 180.23* 10561 Lesco, Inc. 100-4360-1210 686.93 Total for Vndr Lesco, Inc. 686.93* 10563 M.C.F.O.A. 100-4130-3610 30.00 Total for Vndr M.C.F.O.A. 30.00* 10566 Mark's Welding & Fabri 100-4360-1600 35.00 Total for Vndr Mark's Welding & 35.00* 10567 Masys Corporation 100-4200-5100 623.69 Total for Vndr Masys Corporatio 623.69* 10568 McCollister & Co. 100-4462-1700 377.75 Total for Vndr McCollister & Co 377.75* 10570 Micron Electronics, In 100-4160-7030 1,526.67 Total for Vndr Micron Electroni 1,526.67* 10573 Minar Ford 100-4462-1220 77.77 Total for Vndr Minar Ford 77.77* 10575 Minnesota Conway 100-4460-3030 104.88 10575 Minnesota Conway 100-4360-1210 52.33 10575 Minnesota Conway 100-4460-3030 360.40 Total for Vndr Minnesota Conway 517.61* 10577 Minnesota Dept. of Hea 100-4360-3630 92.00 Total for Vndr Minnesota Dept. 92.00* 10580 Minnesota State Treasu 100-3286 536.79 Total for Vndr Minnesota State 536.79* 10581 Municilite 100-4462-1220 93.19 Date: 06/04/1998 Time: 11:39:01 Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 4 City of Mounds View FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Account # Amount Total for Vndr Municilite 93.19* 10587 Northern States Power 100-4475-3211 122.55 10587 Northern States Power 100-4200-3210 6.44 10587 Northern States Power 100-4360-3210 43.19 10587 Northern States Power 100-4475-3211 132.05 10587 Northern States Power 100-4360-3210 207.54 10587 Northern States Power 100-4360-3210 37.85 10587 Northern States Power 100-4360-3210 81.41 10587 Northern States Power 100-4360-3210 7.65 10587 Northern States Power 100-4475-3211 12.25 10587 Northern States Power 100-4360-3210 73.80 10587 Northern States Power 100-4200-3210 6.44 10587 Northern States Power 100-4360-3210 17.75 10587 Northern States Power 100-4360-3220 62.75 10587 Northern States Power 100-4475-3211 101.74 10587 Northern States Power 100-4360-3220 35.78 10587 Northern States Power 100-4160-3210 1,185.96 10587 Northern States Power 100-4160-3210 136.61 Total for Vndr Northern States 2,271.76* 10589 Orkin Exterminating Co 100-4160-5110 82.01 Total for Vndr Orkin Exterminat 82.01* 10590 Pipeline Supply, Inc. 100-4200-1210 50.19 Total for Vndr Pipeline Supply, 50.19* 10594 R.B.K. Enterprises 100-4160-5110 60.00 Total for Vndr R.B.K. Enterpris 60.00* 10597 Remap Corporation 100-4180-3030 49.95 Total for Vndr Remap Corporatio 49.95* 10598 Rent All Minnesota 100-4200-3070 21.68 Total for Vndr Rent All Minneso 21.68* 10602 Shred-It 100-4200-3030 49.95 Total for Vndr Shred-It 49.95* 10603 Snyders 100-4200-1600 23.14 Total for Vndr Snyders 23.14* 10606 Toll Gas & Welding Sup 100-4462-1600 45.29 10606 Toll Gas & Welding Sup 100-4462-1600 5.40 Total for Vndr Toll Gas & Weldi 50.69* 10607 Top Notch Tree Care 100-4380-3520 628.35 Total for Vndr Top Notch Tree C 628.35* 10608 Transportation Compone 100-4465-1220 45.96 Date: 06/04/1998 Time: 11:39:01 Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 5 City of Mounds View FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Account # Amount Total for Vndr Transportation C 45.96* 10611 U. S. West 100-4360-3100 40.24 Total for Vndr U. S. West 40.24* 10610 Uniforms Unlimited 100-4200-2400 85.09 Total for Vndr Uniforms Unlimit 85.09* 10547 W. W. Grainger 100-4462-1600 36.48 Total for Vndr W. W. Grainger 36.48* 10616 West Weld 100-4472-1600 262.27 10616 West Weld 100-4472-1600 27.69 Total for Vndr West Weld 289.96* 10617 Western Bank 100-4160-3030 40.00 Total for Vndr Western Bank 40.00* 10596 Real Productions 210-4350-1600 61.63 Total for Vndr Real Productions 61.63* 10523 Timothy Brennan 220-4200-1600 456.00 Total for Vndr Timothy Brennan 456.00* 10595 Ramsey County Attorney 225-4200-1600 248.20 Total for Vndr Ramsey County At 248.20* 10604 State Treasurer's Offi 225-4200-1600 124.10 Total for Vndr State Treasurer' 124.10* 10524 Briggs & Morgan 230-4650-3030 1,745.16 Total for Vndr Briggs & Morgan 1,745.16* 10536 EDAM Summer Conference 230-4650-3630 160.00 Total for Vndr EDAM Summer Conf 160.00* 10559 Land Title, Inc. 230-4650-7050 142.50 Total for Vndr Land Title, Inc. 142.50* 10519 Bacon's Electric 240-4416-5150 130.68 Total for Vndr Bacon's Electric 130.68* 10587 Northern States Power 240-4416-3210 14.25 10587 Northern States Power 240-4416-3210 11.15 Total for Vndr Northern States 25.40* 10506 A T & T Wireless 245-4415-4010 52.21 Total for Vndr A T & T Wireless 52.21* 10571 Midwest Asphalt Corpor 245-4415-5150 25.66 Date: 06/04/1998 Time: 11:39:01 Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 6 City of Mounds View FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Account # Amount Total for Vndr Midwest Asphalt 25.66* 10614 Unitog Rental Services 245-4415-2400 212.81 10614 Unitog Rental Services 245-4415-2400 336.53 Total for Vndr Unitog Rental Se 549.34* 10518 Athletic Outfitters 250-4351-1600 985.15 Total for Vndr Athletic Outfitt 985.15* 10521 Beisswengers 250-4351-1600 -.50 Total for Vndr Beisswengers -.50* 10504 Carrie Melander 250-3400 28.00 Total for Vndr Carrie Melander 28.00* 10501 Diane Prescott 250-3400 28.00 Total for Vndr Diane Prescott 28.00* 10540 Fedors Market 250-4352-1600 4.78 10540 Fedors Market 250-4352-1600 36.29 Total for Vndr Fedors Market 41.07* 10554 Inside Corner Umpires 250-4352-1600 1,907.50 Total for Vndr Inside Corner Um 1,907.50* 10505 Liz Dahlin 250-3400 56.00 Total for Vndr Liz Dahlin 56.00* 10579 Minnesota Recreation & 250-4352-1600 784.00 10579 Minnesota Recreation & 250-4352-1600 150.00 Total for Vndr Minnesota Recrea 934.00* 10582 National Recreation & 250-4354-1600 330.00 Total for Vndr National Recreat 330.00* 10502 Nina Nguyen 250-3400 25.00 Total for Vndr Nina Nguyen 25.00* 10591 Pletschers' Greenhouse 250-4351-1600 67.90 Total for Vndr Pletschers' Gree 67.90* 10503 Troy Lubinsky 250-3400 56.00 Total for Vndr Troy Lubinsky 56.00* 10583 Nationwide Truck/Trail 252-4350-1600 159.75 Total for Vndr Nationwide Truck 159.75* 10558 Knox Lumber Co. 255-4350-1600 244.36 Total for Vndr Knox Lumber Co. 244.36* Date: 06/04/1998 Time: 11:39:02 Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 7 City of Mounds View FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Account # Amount 10587 Northern States Power 255-4350-3210 13.90 Total for Vndr Northern States 13.90* 10611 U. S. West 255-4350-3100 40.24 Total for Vndr U. S. West 40.24* 10612 USA Waste Services of 255-4350-3530 124.25 Total for Vndr USA Waste Servic 124.25* 10508 Action Press, Inc. 290-4420-3430 1,421.11 Total for Vndr Action Press, In 1,421.11* 10515 American Public Works 700-4823-3610 325.00 Total for Vndr American Public 325.00* 10521 Beisswengers 700-4823-1600 6.37 Total for Vndr Beisswengers 6.37* 10540 Fedors Market 700-4823-1210 6.37 Total for Vndr Fedors Market 6.37* 10541 Fricke & Sons 700-4823-1240 51.12 Total for Vndr Fricke & Sons 51.12* 10542 Fridley, City of 700-4823-3200 82.61 10542 Fridley, City of 700-4823-3200 62.31 10542 Fridley, City of 700-4823-3200 54.31 10542 Fridley, City of 700-4823-3200 46.81 10542 Fridley, City of 700-4823-3200 45.81 Total for Vndr Fridley, City of 291.85* 10544 G E Capital 700-4825-1600 200.22 Total for Vndr G E Capital 200.22* 10546 Gopher State One-Call, 700-4825-3030 171.50 Total for Vndr Gopher State One 171.50* 10548 Green Tree Vendor Sery 700-4823-4010 153.28 Total for Vndr Green Tree Vendo 153.28* 10549 Harmon Glass Company 700-4823-1220 393.25 Total for Vndr Harmon Glass Com 393.25* 10551 Hawkins Water Treatmen 700-4825-1600 1,644.99 Total for Vndr Hawkins Water Tr 1,644.99* 10562 Locator & Monitor Sale 700-4823-5150 187.62 Total for Vndr Locator & Monito 187.62* 10609 Michael Ulrich 700-4823-1600 116.40 Date: 06/04/1998 Time: 11:39:02 Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 8 City of Mounds View FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Account # Amount Total for Vndr Michael Ulrich 116.40* 10576 Minnesota Department o 700-2076 4,050.52 Total for Vndr Minnesota Depart 4,050.52* 10600 Sensus Technologies, 1700-4823-3030 500.00 Total for Vndr Sensus Technolog 500.00* 10601 Short-Elliott & Hendri 700-4823-3030 800.00 Total for Vndr Short-Elliott & 800.00* 10569 Metro Council Environm 705-3718 7,920.00 Total for Vndr Metro Council En 7,920.00* 10521 Beisswengers 730-4823-1230 24.46 Total for Vndr Beisswengers 24.46* 10533 Cues, Inc. 730-4823-3630 144.00 Total for Vndr Cues, Inc. 144.00* 10542 Fridley, City of 730-4823-3231 30.00 10542 Fridley, City of 730-4823-3231 30.00 10542 Fridley, City of 730-4823-3231 30.00 10542 Fridley, City of 730-4823-3231 30.00 10542 Fridley, City of 730-4823-3231 30.00 10542 Fridley, City of 730-4823-3231 30.00 10542 Fridley, City of 730-4823-3231 30.00 10542 Fridley, City of 730-4823-3231 30.00 10542 Fridley, City of 730-4823-3231 30.00 Total for Vndr Fridley, City of 270.00* 10565 MacQueen Equipment, In 730-4823-1230 49.43 10565 MacQueen Equipment, In 730-4823-1230 41.38 10565 MacQueen Equipment, In 730-4823-1230 25.74 Total for Vndr MacQueen Equipme 116.55* 10584 New Brighton Co-op. 730-4826-1700 7.00 Total for Vndr New Brighton Co- 7.00* 10614 Unitog Rental Services 730-4823-2400 -13.85 Total for Vndr Unitog Rental Se -13.85* 10507 A-1 Acrylics 750-4900-1220 81.24 Total for Vndr A-1 Acrylics 81.24* 10513 American Fasteners of 750-4900-1600 38.76 10513 American Fasteners of 750-4900-1600 41.82 Total for Vndr American Fastene 80.58* 10520 Ballomatic, L.L.C. 750-4902-1210 480.70 Date: 06/04/1998 Time: 11:39:02 Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 9 City of Mounds View FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Account # Amount 10520 Ballomatic, L.L.C. 750-4902-1210 1,301.26 Total for Vndr Ballomatic, L.L. 1,781.96* 10521 Beisswengers 750-4900-1600 39.78 10521 Beisswengers 750-4900-1600 17.13 10521 Beisswengers 750-4900-1600 3.73 10521 Beisswengers 750-4900-1600 9.66 Total for Vndr Beisswengers 70.30* 10522 Best Buy 750-4901-1600 28.20 10522 Best Buy 750-4901-1600 259.78 Total for Vndr Best Buy 287.98* 10527 Capitol Beverage Sales 750-4901-1210 186.65 Total for Vndr Capitol Beverage 186.65* 10530 Chemsearch 750-4900-1210 359.43 10530 Chemsearch 750-4900-1210 173.10 Total for Vndr Chemsearch 532.53* 10532 Cottens, Inc. 750-4900-1210 68.72 Total for Vndr Cottens, Inc. 68.72* 10534 Dahlke Trailer Sales, 750-4900-4010 127.80 Total for Vndr Dahlke Trailer S 127.80* 10535 East Side Beverages 750-4901-1210 635.05 Total for Vndr East Side Bevera 635.05* 10545 G T E Directories Corp 750-4901-3420 23.60 Total for Vndr G T E Directorie 23.60* 10553 Hornungs Pro Golf Sale 750-4902-1600 117.02 10553 Hornungs Pro Golf Sale 750-4902-1600 158.73 Total for Vndr Hornungs Pro Gol 275.75* 10555 Insty Prints 750-4901-1600 168.80 Total for Vndr Insty Prints 168.80* 10564 M.T.Y. Distributing Co 750-4900-1600 -77.56 10564 M.T.I. Distributing Co 750-4900-1600 30.11 10564 M.T.I. Distributing Co 750-4900-1600 77.49 10564 M.T.I. Distributing Co 750-4900-1220 70.62 10564 M.T.I. Distributing Co 750-4900-1600 146.14 10564 M.T.I. Distributing Co 750-4900-1600 158.89 Total for Vndr M.T.I. Distribut 405.69* 10578 MGCSA 750-4900-3610 80.00 Total for Vndr MGCSA 80.00* Date: 06/04/1998 Time: 11:39:02 Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 10 City of Mounds View FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Account # Amount 10572 Midwest Coca/Cola 750-4901-1210 2,748.70 Total for Vndr Midwest Coca/Col 2,748.70* 10574 Minnegasco 750-4901-3220 13.83 Total for Vndr Minnegasco 13.83* 10585 Nike, Inc. 750-4901-1210 870.16 Total for Vndr Nike, Inc. 870.16* 10588 Odyssey Golf 750-4901-1210 428.00 Total for Vndr Odyssey Golf 428.00* 10500 Pat Evans 750-3800 200.00 Total for Vndr Pat Evans 200.00* 10592 Professional Golfers' 750-4901-3610 389.00 10592 Professional Golfers' 750-4901-3610 389.00 10592 Professional Golfers' 750-4901-3610 175.00 Total for Vndr Professional Gol 953.00* 10593 Pugsley's Sandwiches, 750-4901-1210 191.76 Total for Vndr Pugsley's Sandwi 191.76* 10605 Sysco Food Services of 750-4901-1600 205.46 10605 Sysco Food Services of 750-4901-1600 149.24 Total for Vndr Sysco Food Servi 354.70* 10614 Unitog Rental Services 750-4900-2400 153.58 Total for Vndr Unitog Rental Se 153.58* 10615 Waste Management - Bla 750-4901-3530 1,169.23 Total for Vndr Waste Management 1,169.23* Grand Total 58,569.29* Date: 06/04/1998 Time: 16:10:40 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 1 FM Entry - Invoice - Check Register Ranges: Bank #: (A) Check Date: (A) Check #: (R) 10397 - 10412 Options: Check # Sort Only: N Format: 2 # of copies: 1 Bank # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Type Amount 1 05/27/1998 A8200 Associates Commercial Corp. 10397 R 750-4901-1600 Operating supplies Lease #23419 1,693.82 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 1,693.82 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10397: 1,693.82 1 05/27/1998 G8125 Graybar Electric Company 10398 R 100-4160-5130 Repairs, equipment Computer System parts 270.24 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 98607 270.24 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10398: 270.24 1 06/03/1998 K1400 KFAN 10399 R 750-4901-3420 Advertising Marketing Package 31.50 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 98640 31.50 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10399: 31.50 1 06/03/1998 K1400 KFAN 10400 R 750-4901-3420 Advertising Marketing Package 3,118.50 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 98641 3,118.50 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10400: 3,118.50 1 06/04/1998 h3000 Health Partners 10401 R 100-2014 Accrued insurance payable June Dental 638.24 100-4180-0420 Dental insurance - employer contribu June Dental 55.67 100-4200-0420 Dental insurance - employer contribu June Dental 300.08 100-4350-0420 Dental insurance - employer contribu June Dental 55.67 100-4360-0420 Dental insurance - employer contribu June Dental 55.67 700-4820-0420 Dental insurance - employer contribu June Dental 10.86 730-4820-0420 Dental insurance - employer contribu June Dental 10.87 700-4823-0420 Dental insurance - employer contribu June Dental 29.59 730-4826-0420 Dental insurance - employer contribu June Dental 26.08 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# June 1,182.73 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10401: 1,182.73 Date: 06/04/1998 Time: 16:10:41 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 2 FM Entry - Invoice - Check Register Bank # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Type Amount 1 06/04/1998 i0025 ICMA Retirement Trust - 457 10402 R 100-2012 PERA payable ICMA for June 04, 1998 154.24 100-2013 Deferred comp payable ICMA for June 04, 1998 3,766.08 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 060498 3,920.32 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10402: 3,920.32 1 06/04/1998 10549 Law Enforcement Labor Services 10403 R 100-2004 Union dues payable Union Dues for June 462.00 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 060498 462.00 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10403: 462.00 1 06/04/1998 m5687 Minnesota Mutual 10404 R 100-2013 Deferred comp payable MN Mutual for 06/04/98 307.69 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 06/04/98 307.69 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10404: 307.69 1 06/04/1998 m0658 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYS 10405 R 100-2013 Deferred comp payable MN Retirement for 06/04/98 140.00 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 06/04/98 140.00 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10405: 140.00 1 06/04/1998 p9250 Public Employees Retirement As 10406 R 100-2014 Accrued insurance payable Life Ins for Pera 45.00 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 06/04/98 45.00 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10406: 45.00 1 06/04/1998 p9250 Public Employees Retirement As 10407 R 100-2012 PERA payable PERA for 06/04/98 9,202.67 250-2012 PERA payable PERA for 06/04/98 110.02 210-2012 PERA payable PERA for 06/04/98 52.95 245-2012 PERA payable PERA for 06/04/98 78.67 240-2012 PERA payable PERA for 06/04/98 3.26 230-2012 PERA payable PERA for 06/04/98 24.62 700-2012 PERA payable PERA for 06/04/98 531.08 730-2012 PERA payable PERA for 06/04/98 594.63 750-2012 PERA payable PERA for 06/04/98 691.22 Date: 06/04/1998 Time: 16:10:41 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 3 FM Entry - Invoice - Check Register Bank # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Type Amount TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 060498 11,289.12 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10407: 11,289.12 1 06/04/1998 r0896 Ramsey County Child Support 10408 R 100-2006 Misc. payroll withholdings Child Support for 06/04/98 690.90 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 06/04/98 690.90 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10408: 690.90 1 06/04/1998 k5555 Richard D. Kampa 10409 R 100-2006 Misc. payroll withholdings Other for June 126.03 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 060498 126.03 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10409: 126.03 1 06/04/1998 t5555 Twin City Federal Mortgage Cor 10410 R 100-2006 Misc. payroll withholdings TCF for June 244.00 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 06/04/98 244.00 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10410: 244.00 1 06/04/1998 u6500 Unum Life Insurance 10411 R 100-2014 Accrued insurance payable Unum Life for June 967.91 100-4200-0410 Life insurance - employer contributi Unum Life for June 2.90 700-4820-0410 Life insurance - employer contributi Unum Life for June 8.15 730-4820-0410 Life insurance - employer contributi Unum Life for June 8.15 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 06/04/98 987.11 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10411: 987.11 1 06/04/1998 w5250 Western Bank 10412 R 100-2006 Misc. payroll withholdings Savings for 06/04/98 120.00 TOTAL FOR INVOICE# 060498 120.00 TOTAL FOR CHECK# 10412: 120.00 Date: 06/04/1998 Time: 16:10:41 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty•Hickok Page: 4 FM Entry - Invoice - Check Register Bank # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Type Amount Total Regular: 24,628.96 Total Manual: .00 Total Regular & Manual: 24,628.96 Total Voided: .00 Bank Total: 24,628.96 Grand Total: 24,628.96 Item No. 5151 Staff Report No. • Meeting Date: Type of Business: WK:Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Barb Benesch Item Title/Subject: 1998-1999 Contractor Licenses Date of Report: June 18, 1998 Please consider the following contractor licenses for approval. All licensees have submitted license fee and proof of adequate insurance. All are renewals unless specified and will expire on June 30, 1999. ASPHALT HVAC Asphalt Driveway Co. A-abc Appliance and Heating Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Albers Sheetmetal and Ventilation, Inc. Blacktop Paving of Minnesota, Inc. All Season Comfort, Inc. Lino Lakes Blacktop Allied Fireside, DBA Fireside Corner Minnesota Roadways Co. Alta, Ltd. (NEW) Northern Asphalt Const., Inc. American Heating& Air Supply, Inc. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Blaine Heating, Air Cond. &Electric, Inc. T.A. Schifsky& Sons, Inc. Clarion Contracting Condor Fireplace& Stone EXCAVATING Cronstrom's Heating & Air Conditioning F.M. Frattalone Excavating & Grading, Inc. Dependable Indoor Air Quality, Inc. Royal Excavating, Inc. Four Seasons Air Specialists (NEW) Hinding Heating& Air FENCE Horwitz, Inc. D.W. Fence Company Kath Heating& Air Conditioning Master Mobile Home Service, Inc. GENERAL (commercial) Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. ACR Homes, Inc. (NEW) Northern Air Corporation (NEW) Advance Construction R& S Heating & Air Conditioning (NEW) Braun Built Corporation Riccar Heating & Air Donahue Construction, Inc. (NEW) Richmond & Sons Electric Inc., DBA Golden Everest Construction Co. Valley Heating& Air FedTech, Inc. St. Marie Sheet Metal, Inc. Flannery Construction, Inc. Schadegg Mechanical Incorporate C. G. Hill& Sons, Inc. Standard Heating& Air Conditioning Co. Kraus-Anderson Construction Company The Maintenance Team Oakview Construction, Inc. (NEW) The Snelling Company Penn Contracting, Inc. Ray N. Welter Heating Co. Petroleum Maintenance, Inc. Woodlund Homes (NEW) Pump &Meter Service, Inc. Yale, Inc. Sandness Construction, Inc. Mayor and City Council Licenses for Approval June 18, 1998 Page 2 MASONRY Neeck Construction, Inc. ROOFING (commercial) E. R. Berwald Roofing Co., Inc. McPhillips Bros. Roofing Company SEWER/WATER Beaver Plumbing SIGN Arrow Sign and Awning, Inc. DeMars Signs, Inc. (NEW) SWIMMING POOL B. Street Quality Construction, Inc. (NEW) Staff Recommendation: Approve licenses as requested. Item No. 6 r�> Type of Business: CA WK.•Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Cari Schmidt Item Title/Subject: (998 Garbage Hauler License Renewals Date of Report: June 17, 1998 The following garbage/hauler licenses expire on June 30, and are eligible for renewal for 1998/1999: Ace Twin City Refuse BFI UWS Gallaghers Keith Kruppeny and Sons Vasko Rubbish Larry's Sanitation Veit Materials Recovery Walter's Rubbish Randy's Waste Management of Blaine Ray Anderson Twin City Sanitation Staff Recommendation: Approve renewal license upon receipt of check, application and insurance information. Item No. gi) Type of Business: CA WK.•Work Session;PH•Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Cari Schmidt Item Title/Subject: 1998-1999 Restaurant License Renewals Date of Report: June 17, 1998 The following restaurant licenses expire on June 30, 1998, and are eligible for renewal for 1998/1999. Blimpies Pink Flower Burger King RJ Riches Donatelles Roberts Off Ten Donut Connection Subway Hardees Taco Bell KFC McDonalds Mermaid Mounds View Best Steak House Perkins Staff Recommendation: Approve license renewals upon receipt of check, application and insurance information. Item No. 1?ik Type of Business: PH WK:Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Cari Schmidt Item Title/Subject: Public Hearings Regarding On-Sale Intoxicating and Off Sale Intoxicating License Renewals Date of Report: June 19, 1998 The following licenses are up for renewal for off-sale intoxicating liquor and on-sale intoxicating liquor. Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor Network Liquors - 2345 County Rd. H2- Budget Liquor - 2577 Highway 10- Murzyn Liquor - 2740 Highway 10- On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor Donatelle's - 2400 Highway 10- Robert's Off 10 - 2400 County Rd. H2- Mermaid, Inc. - 2200 Highway 10- Staff has completed the following investigations regarding the renewal of the licenses: ✓ Report from the Utility Department indicated that all utilities are paid to date. ✓ Current information regarding the status of property taxes indicates that Network Liquors is delinquent in the payment of their property taxes. The other businesses have paid their property taxes to date. ✓ Report from the Police Department which indicated that there were no incidents which would prevent any of the above licenses from being renewed, with the exception of Murzyn's Liquor (see attached report). ✓ Report from Mark Bishop, Fire Marshall, indicated that all six businesses were in compliance. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the licenses listed above be approved contingent upon receipt of the application, insurance, check, and payment of delinquent property taxes. Please see Chief Ramacher's memo regarding Murzyn's Liquor. City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor, City Council From: Chief Ramacher Subject: Hearing regarding Murzyn Liquor Date: June 17, 1998 Attached is a memo to Chuck Whiting concerning Murzyn Liquor Store. I am requesting that Council familiarize itself with the contents of the memo and the attached police reports. There will be a hearing concerning the renewal of Murzyn's Liquor license at the June 22 meeting. In light of the activity at Murzyn's in the past month, I am recommending the following alternatives for Council consideration. 1. The Council can renew the license with a warning that if the problems continue, there will be a revocation hearing; or 2. The Council can simply not renew Murzyn's license for the upcoming year; or 3. The Council can suspend Murzyn's license effective immediately, and set a Public Hearing for the next Council meeting on the 13th of July to discuss non-renewal or revocation(pursuant to Municipal Code 502.16, Subd. 3) If Council chooses to suspend the license immediately, the suspension will be valid until July 1, when the current license expires. At the July 13 meeting, Council could decide whether or not to make the suspension permanent, or to renew the license. Cari has discussed the legality of this matter with Scott Riggs, and this procedure seems to be possible via the Municipal Code. Please contact me with your concerns or questions. MEMO To: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator From: Chief Ramacher Subject: Murzyn Liquor Store Date: June 10, 1998 In the last month, I have been in contact with you regarding liquor law violations occurring at Murzyn Liquor Store, 2840 highway 10. The following is a synopsis of those violations: CASE#1 5-8-98, A 17yr old male bought a case of beer from a female clerk. The juvenile male stated he was not asked for an ID. The Juvenile was charged with purchasing/possession of alcohol. Rose Marie Le(female clerk)was charged with an ordinance violation of selling liquor to a minor. Disposition pending. CASE#2 5-23-98,A 19 yr old male bought four 12 packs of beer from a female clerk. The male stated he showed the clerk an ID the showed he was 19 yrs old. The 19 yr old was charged with possession of alcohol. Rose Marie Le (female clerk) was charged with a gross misdemeanor, selling alcohol to a person under 21 years of age. Disposition pending. CASE#3 6-6-98,A 16 yr old male bought beer and wine coolers from a female clerk. The male stated that he use his brother ID. His brother is 21 yr old. The Juvenile was charged with possession of alcohol. Charges pending on female clerk. Attached to this memo is the case files of the above listed cases. Please notify and share this information with the City Council so that they can take the appropriate action. Please contact me if you have any comments or would like additional information. Item No. Staff Report No. Meeting Date: June 22, 1998 Type of Business: PH& CB WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: James Ericson, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution No. 5242, a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Accessory Building at 2085 Oakwood Dr. Planning Case No. 529-98. Date of Report: June 18, 1998 Applicable Regulations: 1106.03, Subd. lg: No accessory building other than a garage shall exceed 216 square feet, except by CUP. 1106.03, Subd. 1h: The combined square footage for all accessory buildings on a lot shall not occupy more than 25% of the rear yard. 1106.04, Subd.6: The combined square footage of all accessory buildings on one lot cannot exceed 1,264 square feet; if the garage square footage is greater than 1,000 square feet, no other accessory building shall be allowed. Background: The applicants, Leonard Medrud and Arthur Jordan, have applied for a conditional use permit to convert an existing, single-car garage to an accessory building on their property located at 2085 Oakwood Drive. The dimensions of the existing garage are 14 feet by 20 feet for an area of 280 square feet. To replace the existing garage, the applicant is constructing a new two-car garage and breezeway area attached to the house. The area of the parcel on which the house and garage are situated is approximately 12,630 square feet, or 0.29 acres. The backyard area comprises more than half of the lot at 7,650 square feet. The Planning Commission, at their meeting on June 3, 1998, unanimously recommended approval of Resolution 551-98, a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of this conditional use permit request. Analysis: Dimensional Requirements: Required Proposed Met? Shed Setbacks (Side) 5 feet 27 feet Met (Rear) 5 feet 40 feet Met Planning Case No. 529-98 Medrud&Jordan CUP June 18, 1998 Page 2 Percent of Rear Yard < 25% 3.6% Met Area of all Accessory Buildings*: _< 1,264 sf. 764 sf. Met *Includes existing garage and garage under construction CUP requirements: Section 1106.04 of the Zoning Code states that no accessory building other than a garage shall exceed 216 square feet except by conditional use permit. With a CUP, the maximum area for all accessory buildings is 1,264 square feet. Section 1125.01 gives a list of criteria that must be satisfied in order for conditional use permits to be approved. These criteria are as follows: 1. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas so as to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property, 2085 Oakwood Drive, low-density residential. This proposal does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Geographical Area Involved. 4. The Character of the Surrounding Area Almost every lot in this area of Mounds View is the same size as the subject property. Most of the homes in the immediate area are larger, with more building coverage. There appears to be an even split between homes with attached garages and homes with detached garages. Many of the homes have sheds in addition to their garages . 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. The conversion of the existing garage will serve to increase the subject property's value without negatively impacting the values of the neighboring properties. 5. The demonstrated need for such a use. The existing garage is small, even for a single car garage. The applicants desire a garage big enough to park more than one vehicle inside at a time. The structure, however, is in solid repair, and could be retained as a storage shed, which the applicants currently do not have. This proposal satisfies the conditional use permit criteria. Also in Section 1125.01, the Planning Commission is to examine the possible adverse affects of the oversized shed, which are as follows: (1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. Planning Case No. 529-98 Medrud&Jordan CUP June 18, 1998 Page 3 (7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. (8) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be provided. The conversion of the garage to a storage shed will not create a greater impact on existing public facilities or services, on utilities or access roads, nor will it create an increase in traffic on adjacent streets. There will be no increase in runoff from the shed above which is currently generated. (2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. (3) The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent residential properties. The location of the garage/shed behind the home will hide it from general public view. The structure will be in full view of the adjoining properties, although this is already the case. (4) The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. (5) The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. (6) The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. Sheds and out-buildings are typical uses in residential areas, and allow for the storage of yard and garden equipment . Having this shed will allow for the property owners to store items, currently left outside, within a secure and protected structure. Staff believes that the adverse affects of this development proposal are minimal and are far out- weighed by the overall benefits. Recommendation: Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of Resolution No. 5242, a resolution approving a conditional use permit for Leonard Medrud and Arthur Jordan, to allow for a 280 square-foot oversized shed at 2085 Oakwood Drive, with stipulations. 01-6,Arvla EiltAA-Vh James Ericson, Planning Associate N:\data\groups\comdev\devcases\529-98\shed-cup.cc l n 1:777 7 i [Tfl ?xcanrA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View MN 55112 -P„t„ers* ' 612-717-4020 612-784-3462 -FAX Please Type or Print Information-Complete Both Sides of This Form Applicant Information Name of Applicant Leonard Medrud & Arthur Jordan Telephone 612-784-4275 Address 2085 Oakwood Drive Fax • Mounds View, MN 55112 Interest in Property(check appropriate box) ❑x Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner 0 Lessee,Operator,Manager ❑ ' `'FAgreement to Purchase ❑ Other(explain) Applicants must provide evidence of interest in property at the time of application,and if you are not the owner of the property,you must provide a letter of permission from the owner giving consent to the filing of this application. The property owner must sign this application for it to be accepted. Property Description/Proposal „ Address or General Location 2 085 Oakwood Dr. , Mounds View, MN 5 5112" Legal Description Lot 29, Block 1 , Pinewood Terrace. Property Identification#(PIN#) --'-3 8 3 2 0 5 & `3 8 3 20 6 S'-3 O c�.3— 'E3o ��_ • of Acres �:.._. 29 Current Zoning Residential • Type of Application ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment $250 o Rezoning $250/acre; min$250 max$1500 ❑ Major Subdivision $250+$250 deposit* ❑ Minor Subdivision $200 ❑ Planned Unit Development(PUD) Refer to rezoning fees ❑ PUD Amendment $350 • Conditional Use Permit �R-1, R-2$73)all others$250 ❑ Variance R-1, R-2$100 all others$250 ❑ Code Appeal $100 ❑ Develop Review/Site Plan $125/acre;min$125 max$750 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit R-1,R-2$150;all others$200 ❑ Wetland Buffer Permit R-1,R-2$25;all others$100 ❑' Floodplain Permit $200 O Other • *Deposits shall be paid to cover all costs of public notices,materials and staff or consultant time spent in the review, research or preparation of materials associated with this application. The applicant shall be responsible for all reasonable incurred costs in excess of the initial deposit amount. Any portion of the deposit not spent or encumbered shall be refunded to the applicant within thirty(30)days alter consideration of the application is completed. Please complete the reverse side of this application. City of Mounds View, MN Development Application Page 2 Present Use of Property a Undeveloped/Vacant x❑ Single Family Dwelling ❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling 0 Multi-family Dwelling O Business/Commercial Establishment. 0 Industrial Establishment O Other(explain) • Property Classification 0 Abstract Torrens DescriptionofProposal 7 foot addition to west wall n hni,GP AnCC 22 x 22 foot attached garage; existing garage of 14 by 20 (280 square foot) to be used as storage • BY MY(OUR)SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY DECLARE THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY _; KNOWLEDGE,THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. Signature of Applicant. ' ./ ' i ‘°'- Name of Applicant(typed/printed) Leonard Medrud Arthur -L. Jo'Ian Signature of Property Owner - ' - • / e Name of Property Owner(typed/printed) Leonard' Medr`ui3. -' Arthur L 'Jordan Address of Owner 2085 Oakwood--Drive ... • Mounds View, MN 55112 Phone Number of Owner 784-4275 (h) 879-5332 (w) ************************************************************************************************ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Submittal S-11 -. Date of Acceptance Assigned to: Planning Case No. 60-day Limit 120-day limit Fees Paid: Account# Check# Receipt# Application:.... , 23—•v a 9.3 7,3 9 Park Dedication: Deposits: Other: Total: N:\DATA,\GROUPS\COMDEV\FORMS\DEVAPP.FOR 1/98 V N N N NNf 5721 I ..- • I - DR 2245 - 0 o '• N 5711 ln ail 1 IS Z) I CN N N N N € '� I I 223iti N 2200 5701 =: - g N r t. .1116 , N N 2233 r, 5691 r3 TDO _ '5 4 • 5681 I s NNNNN5671 2 0 c.:14. AP 0; i Ts) .) � N N N N N ��� N L P N 5561_ COLONIAL VILLAGE I I 3 MOBILE HOME PARK LI O O 0 OflrIu„N N N N N N N N N ,- O O N NNNNN N N N N N N N N N I /'�/ HILLVIEW 6 Fzi COO N rD U7 U) ' M CO N O 0 W CO CO CO N CO CO • (00 O d CD 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N CO M'1 N • 0 O Op p a ^O • N N N N N N N N N N N N N N OAKWOOD' N N N N N N N N N N N � ( O u' aiiW in PARK N N PF M M mi. .• I O o •• `-, • a OAKWO N N N N T N N N N N N N • = N N r;..., ElaValimmu • `1W Ii. MMO00 ` OOOfO c rD O N N N •iO) r) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N gangormil V_ C • + N ( 2 2 M 2 N - O rii 8- 00 1� Ro Pi TCR•WCe N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I®gUWMA DR •INN sour d- t. rb N rD OD N tD 00 O N ro O d• rD o I. tD � � et M M N O Q)�Df 00 I. nU 00000 N N N N N N N N NNN 0 N N N N N PINEWOOD zoom/moo - , OR � (f It) N Q) d N 0) M N O) M I• .- U) I. • N rD tri d• r) M N ,- O co rn 00 r. t` 00 O d CD #074 O • co N 00 N CO N N N N N r) N • N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N/ ^ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N • ''• 1 ca 5511 5512 II 5511 5497 p 5505 n 5503 ct 5504 5499 PINEWOOD • N ' 5493 5494 5493 SCHOOL I 5486 5485 5500 l 0 5479 , In . 4 5473 5475 547ilp8 5475 , W 3 5467 5464 5466 5467 ~Q I 2 5463 5459 E— 1 5455 N • • SSS' 5453 F- ��. 3 5447 G��O SASS 544711111 t• "°0, ,J':•, W I 1 5441 `tCe ��S We 5439 r0) r) z . 5.111 .S 740 5433 N ^ V7 ,� Zoning Map Planning Case 529-98 Applicant: L. Medrud & A. Jordan N4 Location: 2085 Oakwood Drive 1111111--,a___.),711 -1_ il2085 Oakwood Drive w r- � " ire. _ /F-ml I I-;_=,; 17__� Leonard .Medrud & r.��. .. nmllll: `� ''-III II_ �! ._.:�1=—'... ••--,,,E iIIIIu rm ham` .;;.?PIES;1111111.4 ._�:mum Arthur Jordan 'i;I�ll,�_;In1{1I���.I11 ::_...:umnnu: -- I +l :P.9 g+g— Li se_LL:111,4Iy"Ira jiIIE _�_...,,..0 . Existing Site Plan m�nIfllllllllllNig or. En Mil iir _ =nnnl/llllilll■Illlllllllll= _,""1,111111111111 1IlIIIIlI11Ii11 CUP Application for '1llllll/lll.11tll•,l•�,I{n111111111111 _ "�T � 1:L _ =II_ _ Area of 1U.gil _ Ell _ 0 _AgE Ban Area Inger Oversized Shed -I Tull. a♦/ . Ilfl al= p, *MO �_ IIII 11 IFHI1-MM MTF--��' �_� ��]] �•�e� IIII IIII {{{� ILL 113rrriiiiiiiii�+� ��11�I{III P).-. VII \ Nfi-mmIIt,,I'1, iI � _�u u° iiiriiii �a�� `��. ._,„.„,,_,_._.......111.1M qi.,,,,,� oh ...,...0 ...Mk. Illi Er -,:, \/ Hillview Road I 111 IIP ■ ■ 1 III ,,,, 0 0 W 0 o0 • 2085 III II ., CO 111111111111 1111 III IIII 1111 Oakwood Drive ? , I j1 ! -F -11. 11: 1I1- ji - fj1- 1.-. 1 -'-'1-- L- F--1- j /- • •f---- , .1------1III1 - 4----j---4--.--f----7-'----.4.----' '' 1 ! i .. ________________ ____ _________ _ . . _ . . ' . _____. . , _ _(:)43s1~100 _______ ____ \ - I . _ ____ . • . . 1 i i t : . • : - ; N • . . f . 4 • ' . . , i . . I ililiJ -1, j _5'Forigi e , . . : . . • I , • . . .... 31 I- . —A7t . .9-.• i r . . . . . . • , .../ '::---7 ' . * EXI311NO . .... ,. ; . ' , . . , ..: • • . . , . , . , . , : . • - , . : . •1 i 1 ; ; 1 : , : , : : : : ; ; , : ; : ; : : •1 . , 1 1 • 1._ . I ! • . I j ! . 1 I r 1 1 ! 1 L i 1 1 . 1 I " ' : • itt t 1 • i . • i. i v , . t , 1 1 I , I , ! • I , if : , . i ' . i Ma• : i CAT 1Ti,i) Xr C it).' • ° - . ; I/__ e • E_k__-371.-41 , :,..,, • : .0 -e 4 ----ii------>." . _ „.; r 1 i. iiir ' 41 ' I : lc , _ 7 t6o it)tiors i y_c__,Ejijil,/r.) .. 1 i . EI I • , , I = 111,,, • :. . . . , . 4 1 , I ,i i 4 1 , ; . 1 , • i.. . , . , • s.• . . : . ______ , • _ . - • • , , -.- ---- P - . ' ' i ; --' :Neu) a Atil_SICPC rib,i)' ” '51) 6 •, : . ,.. : • • I . . - __ __. • . . . . . . . • . . , — , . . • . • : . . • : • . _ . — - — ___ MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 551-98 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR AN OVERSIZED STORAGE SHED FOR LEONARD MEDRUD AND ARTHUR JORDAN AT 2085 OAKWOOD DRIVE; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. 529-98 Whereas, Leonard Medrud and Arthur Jordan have applied for a conditional use permit to convert an existing 280 square-foot garage into a back yard storage shed on property located at 2085 Oakwood Drive, zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, legally described as followed: LOT 29, BLOCK 1, PINEWOOD TERRACE RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, The Mounds View Zoning Code allows, with a conditional use permit, up to 1,264 square feet of garage/accessory building on one lot; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: a. Planning Application b. Zoning Map c. Site Plan d. Area Map with Building Footprints WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the dimensional requirements in Chapter 1104 the Zoning Code for this proposal have been met; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings that possible adverse effects have been considered in its recommendation, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 1.e.: 1. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas so as to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property,2085 Oakwood Drive,low-density residential. This proposal does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Geographical Area Involved. 4. The Character of the Surrounding Area Planning Commission Resolution 551-98 June 3, 1998 Page 2 Almost every lot in this area of Mounds View is the same size as the subject property. Most of the homes in the immediate area are larger,with more building coverage. There appears to be an even split between homes with attached garages and homes with detached garages. Many of the homes have sheds in addition to their garages . 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. The conversion of the existing garage will serve to increase the subject property's value without negatively impacting the values of the neighboring properties. 5. The demonstrated need for such a use. The existing garage is small,even for a single car garage. The applicants desire a garage big enough to park more than one vehicle inside at a time. The structure,however,appears to be in good repair,and could be retained as a storage shed,which the applicants currently do not have. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings regarding the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 3.b.: (1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools,streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. (7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. (8) Adequate utilities, access roads,drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be provided. The conversion of the garage to a storage shed will not create a greater impact on existing public facilities or services,on utilities or access roads,nor will it create an increase in traffic on adjacent streets. There will be no increase in runoff from the shed above which is currently generated. (2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. (3) The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent residential properties. The location of the garage/shed behind the home will hide it from general public view. The structure will be in full view of the adjoining properties,although this is already the case. (4) The use,in the opinion of the City Council,is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. (5) The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. (6) The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. Sheds and out-buildings are typical uses in residential areas,and allow for the storage of yard and garden equipment. Having this shed will allow for the property owners to store items currently left outside within a secure and protected structure. Planning Commission Resolution 551-98 June 3, 1998 Page 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following stipulations: 1. The conditional use permit shall be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of City Council approval, and a receipt of such recording shall be provided to the City of Mounds View. 2. The shed shall be kept in good repair and maintained into the future so as to provide a uniform and consistent building appearance with the existing house. 3. The shed shall not be used for living space or other uses not allowed by the district in which it is located or by the Zoning Code. Should the use change for which the permit was granted, the conditional use permit shall become null and void. 4. No other sheds or accessory buildings, other than the garage currently under construction, shall be allowed on this lot. 5. There shall be no vehicle access to this shed, nor shall any vehicle be stored within said structure. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 3rd day of June, 1998. Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (SEAL) N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\520-98\540-98PC.RES RESOLUTION NO. 5242 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR AN OVERSIZED STORAGE SHED FOR LEONARD MEDRUD AND ARTHUR JORDAN AT 2085 OAKWOOD DRIVE; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. 529-98 WHEREAS, Leonard Medrud and Arthur Jordan have applied for a conditional use permit to convert an existing 280 square-foot garage into a back yard storage shed on property located at 2085 Oakwood Drive, zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, legally described as followed: LOT 29, BLOCK 1, PINEWOOD TERRACE RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, The Mounds View Zoning Code allows, with a conditional use permit, up to 1,264 square feet of garage/accessory building on one lot; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: a. Planning Application b. Zoning Map c. Site Plan d. Area Map with Building Footprints WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the dimensional requirements in Chapter 1104 the Zoning Code for this proposal have been met; and, WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings that possible adverse effects have been considered in its recommendation, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. i.e.: 1. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas so as to improve the quality,appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property,2085 Oakwood Drive,low-density residential. This proposal does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Geographical Area Involved. 4. The Character of the Surrounding Area Almost every lot in this area of Mounds View is the same size as the subject property. Most of the Resolution 5242 June 22, 1998 Page 2 homes in the immediate area are larger,with more building coverage. There appears to be an even split between homes with attached garages and homes with detached garages. Many of the homes have sheds in addition to their garages . 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. The conversion of the existing garage will serve to increase the subject property's value without negatively impacting the values of the neighboring properties. 5. The demonstrated need for such a use. The existing garage is small,even for a single car garage. The applicants desire a garage big enough to park more than one vehicle inside at a time. The structure,however,appears to be in good repair,and could be retained as a storage shed,which the applicants currently do not have. WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings regarding the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 3.b.: (1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks,schools,streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. (7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. (8) Adequate utilities, access roads,drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be provided. The conversion of the garage to a storage shed will not create a greater impact on existing public facilities or services,on utilities or access roads,nor will it create an increase in traffic on adjacent streets. There will be no increase in runoff from the shed above which is currently generated. (2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. (3) The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent residential properties. The location of the garage/shed behind the home will hide it from general public view. The structure will be in full view of the adjoining properties,although this is already the case. (4) The use,in the opinion of the City Council,is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. (5) The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. (6) The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. Sheds and out-buildings are typical uses in residential areas,and allow for the storage of yard and garden equipment. Having this shed will allow for the property owners to store items currently left outside within a secure and protected structure. Resolution 5242 June 22, 1998 Page 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the conditional use permit with the following stipulations: 1. The conditional use permit shall be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of City Council approval, and a receipt of such recording shall be provided to the City of Mounds View. 2. The shed shall be kept in good repair and maintained into the future so as to provide a uniform and consistent building appearance with the existing house. 3. The shed shall not be used for living space or other uses not allowed by the district in which it is located or by the Zoning Code. Should the use change for which the permit was granted, the conditional use permit shall become null and void. 4. No other sheds or accessory buildings, other than the garage currently under construction, shall be allowed on this lot. 5. There shall be no motor vehicle access to this shed, nor shall any motor vehicle be stored within said structure. Adopted this 22nd day of June, 1998. Duane McCarty, Mayor ATTEST: Charles S. Whiting, City Clerk/Administrator (SEAL) N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\529-98\5242CC.RES Item No. IC Staff Report No. Meeting Date: June 22, 1998 Type of Business: PH& CB WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: James Ericson, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution No. 5243, a Resolution Approving a PUD Amendment to the Silverview Estates PUD and Development Review for a Senior Cooperative Housing Development. Planning Case No. 530-98. Date of Report: June 18, 1998 Background: On December 8, 1997, the City Council approved Resolution 5184, a resolution approving the development stage plan of the Silverview Estates PUD. Permits have been issued and work is progressing on the Holiday Stationstore at the corner of Highway 10 and Silver Lake Road. On May 7, 1998, City Staff met with the applicant, Realife Cooperative of Mounds View and representatives of Silverview Estates, Inc., to discuss the method by which the existing Silverview Estates PUD could be amended to allow for an alternative style senior housing component. Originally planned as an 82-unit senior housing building, the current proposal reduces the number of units to 77 and changes the ownership structure to cooperative ownership instead of market rate rental. This cooperative housing arrangement, according to the applicant's narrative, offers people 62 years and older a housing alternative that is becoming increasingly popular. The residents own and operate the development through a non-profit cooperative corporation. The cooperative approach to housing has been successful because it offers a housing alternative similar to continuing home ownership. Discussion: PUD Amendment: The PUD document for the approved Silverview Estates will need only minor changes to allow for the third party developer--Realife Cooperative of Mounds View--to develop the senior residential component of the PUD as presented in the plans dated 5/31/98. These changes are as follows: Realife Cooperative of Mounds View PUD Amendment &Development Review June 17, 1998 Page 2 Item 5. On Page 3 of 11, the setback for the building on Lot 4 (the senior residential building) would be reduced from 27 feet to 23 feet to account for the reconfigured building. While not stated in the PUD, this reduced setback would only apply to the building's north corner as Silver Lake Road curves to meet Highway 10. All other parts of the building meet the 30 foot setback. Item 23. Beginning on Page 9 of 11, the names of the owners of record are listed. To this list shall be added Realife Cooperative of Mounds View. A notary block shall also be added for Realife Cooperative and its appropriate person of representation. The changes to the PUD will appear as an attachment to the already-approved PUD document, signed and notarized by all parties public and private having an interest in the Silverview Estates development. Development Review: This type of use, a senior residential facility, is allowed on this lot according to the adopted PUD for Silverview Estates. Because the building will be significantly different from what was originally proposed, the plans will need to be reapproved. Dimensional Requirements: Required Proposed Met? Building Height: _< 48 feet 45 feet Yes Building Setbacks • Front (Silver Lake Rd): 27 feet 23 feet No • Side (Holiday) 15 feet 24 feet Yes Parking Lot Setbacks • Front (Silver Lake Rd): 30 feet 30 feet Yes Building Design: The proposed building is of a three story serpentine design over a one story precast concrete garage. The siding will be prefinished lap siding with brick veneer up to the top of the first floor windows. All units, which range in sizes from 825 square feet to 1,605 square feet, will have a deck of wood construction extending six feet out beyond the building. There will be a variety of one and two-bedroom unit styles provided. The garage area will have one-way traffic with angled parking stalls to foster safe vehicular movement. Drainage: There are two NURP ponds located on the site to capture the stormwater runoff. These ponds have received Rice Creek Watershed approval and have been reviewed by the City Engineer. Because of the changes to the building design and ground coverage, the applicant's consulting engineer has prepared revised drainage calculations and site plans and submitted them to the Rice Creek Watershed District for their review. It is possible that the Watershed District permit may have to be amended, which could be done administratively. Realife Cooperative of Mounds View PUD Amendment& Development Review June 17, 1998 Page 3 Parking: The parking in front of the building has been rearranged so that there are 21 stalls, each 9.0 feet by 18.0 feet. Of the 21 stalls, four would be handicapped van accessible. Inside the building, there would be 78 parking stalls, one more than the number of dwelling units. All together, a total of 99 parking stalls would be provided. The PUD currently requires a minimum of 89 parking stalls, or 1.15 stalls per dwelling unit. There will be overflow parking available in the office parking lot behind the senior building, which is guaranteed through recorded cross- access driveway and parking agreements. Utilities: There are no changes proposed on the site with regard to utilities. The drainage on the Silver Lake Road side of the complex will collect in the graded parking area and will be diverted through two catch basins into the NURP pond. From the NURP pond, the outlet will drain the filtered runoff into the wetland by means of a storm sewer. On the other side of the complex, the runoff will be filtered through the grass before reaching (1) the private drive, (2) the larger of the two NURP ponds behind the building, or(3) the wetland area. The amount of runoff entering directly into the wetlands should be minimal and will have been filtered by the lawn and natural area. The Fire Marshal has reviewed the revised plans and has indicated that a fire hydrant will need to be installed on the east side of Silver Lake Road. His memo is attached for reference. Landscaping: The landscape plan has been forwarded to the City forester for his review. On the whole, the landscape plan and planting schedule is acceptable, according to Forester Wriskey. The only change he would recommend is to substitute Red Splendor Crab trees for the Radiant Crabs, which are susceptible to disease in the summer months. Access: The access to the site will remain the same--two drive aisles off of Silver Lake Road. The only change to the site plan with regard to access or circulation is that the senior building no longer has access to the internal private driveway, which eliminates possible traffic conflicts. Access and grading permits will need to be obtained through Ramsey County before any City building permits can be issued. Lighting: The lighting plan submitted shows three light standards in the parking lot with 250 watt bulbs and nine bollard type fixtures along the walkway fronting the building. The bollard lights are shown to be three and one-half feet high. The footcandle diagrams satisfy the requirements of the Code. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission, at its meeting on June 17, 1998, voted unanimously to recommend approval of the PUD amendment and Development Review, as indicated in Resolutions 552-98 and 553-98, which are attached for your reference. Realife Cooperative of Mounds View PUD Amendment &Development Review June 17, 1998 Page 4 Recommendation: Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of Resolution 5243, a resolution approving the PUD Amendment for the Silverview Estates PUD and a Development Review for Realife Cooperative of Mounds View. acuitu James Ericson, Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Planning Application, dated 5/29/98 2. Zoning Map 3. Applicant's Narrative, dated 5/29/98 4. Silverview Estates PUD Document, approved 12/8/97 5. Draft Brochure, Realife Cooperative of Mounds View(separate attachment) 6. Site Plans, Realife Cooperative of Mounds View (separate attachment) 7. Memo from Fire Marshal, dated 6/8/98 8. Planning Commission Resolution No. 552-98 9. Planning Commission Resolution No. 553-98 10. City Council Resolution No. 5243 N:\DATA\USERSVIM E\SHARE\CC-REPRT.TEM Received Feb-13-97 12:48pm -om 612 784 3462 i REALIFE I''" page 2 05/21:98 11:49 FAX 812 7' 3yJ2 CITY OF XV 002 �...... I 1' 6D1 CONDIVNITYDEVELOPI N'TDEP-ARTMLNT T�;r DEVELOP�YT APPLICATION •A �,�,�M 2401 IztQhway 10, Mounds View iii+ 55I12 �O?n•.rc-parmef+r,Q' 612-717-4020 612-734.-3462 -FAX Please Type or Print Information-Complete Both Sides of This Form Applicant Information Nsme of Applicant Realife C o o D e r a ,j,v e nf M cm n d R V i e wTeiep hone 8 9 4-6 511 AMdrms C/0 Realife, Inc Fax 894-6520 605 W Travelers Trail Burnsville , MN 55337 Interest in Property, (check appropriate box) Owner of?ropezty a Coats cs for Deed Owner Lasso, 0perraor,Maaagcr XIX Asyreetaent:o Purchase a Other(=plain) Applicants must provide evidence of interest is property at the time of application,and if you are not the owner of the property,you Diose provide a letter of permission from the owner tag consent to the filing of this application. Tine property owner must sign this application for!t to be accepted. Property DracriptlonProposal Address or C-=eral Location Hwy T n sit qi i v r T airA R 7 7 5 uce4., ( lr' , L. sl Des cion gT4' /o( I S-)///,ore/,' Property Ideatiucacion*(1124 of A= • Current Zoning PTTs Type of Application a Comprehensive?!on Amerdt:rent S�0 a Rezoning S2 0/a min StIO wax SI5(30 C Major Subdivision 52 C;.S?50 deposit* C Miner Subdivision S2C0 C P!a=e i Unit Deve.opmezt(PL u) to=ening fens PUD Ame ert 5350 C Conditional Use P=niit - , r4,2 S75;ail odhs S25.0 Variance R-1. 1Z-2 S 100 all others 5250 Code Appeal SILO Develop Rev.ewiSite Pi= S I lf./a=r4 mite S 1_S max 5750 3 7S.ou c Wetland Alteration Payit R-1,R-2 S ISO; all others 5200 C Wetland Bur=Pw'..it R-1,R-2 S25;ail others S I00 C Ficodpiain Petit S200 Other *Deposita shall be paid to cover all erss of public:otic .:sat&-leis and staeor consultant time spent s the review., =earth or pre;,aratien of crat=lais associated with thislic anon. The aposome shall be;espea ble for all.-e soaabie incia7-4 costs in exoers of to initial de.tmisit=cunt Any potion ci t'ae deposit not spent or enc':mom shall be era C: to:he:colic t•.yi•;:it.thirry(S0)days ater:.::.siclereaott of the cepil,:.r:on is=agIeted. Please complete the reve7e side of this application. Received Feb-13-97 12:48pm from 612 784 3462 -► REALIFE ": page 3 03:21:98 11:30 FAX 812 4482 CITY OF HY 003 City of Mounds View, MN Development Application Page 2 Present Use of c?rcpety UrdevelopedNar mt C Single Family Dwelling Dup1 wo Family Dwelling a Multi-PITTTily Dwelling C Susi ncssJComme:ciai Establishment a Indtuarisl Establishment Other(=plain) • ?roper:),C:1-ffT aQ0a C Absoact C Torreas Deseripranof?raoosal Development of a 77 unit Senior Cooperative Firm si ng. • EY MY(OUR)SION. ATURE ON T."-E.5 APPLICATION t r..n"�.s?Y DECLARE TrAT,TO:IE BEST OF MY IC:+O WILE.7.-2 INFORMATION PRO a ere 13 TRUE • ' A =RATE. Siam of Apolicat \ Natae of Apalicaat(typed/printed) b A0,X Sipanas ofFroperty Owner 7.0 r s 1-ji N3 ofP pity owner( ed/.p ) h — — ` - Addyress of Owner c'/ 9'‘ ,.sv,'K,fTo-pt /Al/ i/•e ra,v u.'� 114,3"-- s—s-/,T,6' Phone Number of Owner FOR OFFICE USE°mu Date of Subtriaz1 /Y - - Date of Atmlcs Assigned:o: Planning Case No. 4:�j 0- ch 6C-d v Limit LLQ-+ Sy 11 t Pais: A=unt Ce&# Reit Appli=noa: 00 Y) �,i (,)0 } `-4.3 q 1 • ?ark D Madan: Deposits. Other: Total: `NDA:A:CRCUPSCOMCswaraismEvAFP.FOR UPS 8005 7990 ! 7985 1 8004 7981 ~i-T 7990 0 7981 1 7990 O 7989 1 • e 7g q r7975 7970 7979 ,_7980 7969 7980 7979 1, co 1_79601 7965 7960 7959 1 A7970 47965 1 7969 1 ------s ki t 7950 7955 J 7956 , 7949 7954 7959 7966 N 79 7 £ 7934 7940 7945 f 7946 2 7933 `—"�! 7932 7950 7930 7935 `1 7930 7917 i ig rg: 7 ^ ^ 79017900 co +N 7900 79011 N ! N 1 ; O O N N N 7900 N N 1 + cc HILLVIEW RO, N N au'� 03 ! 0:1 ! i N1 '— I 7 N 101. SAA/4) N 1 7886 8 78911 N 11: 17880 17880 7895; N! 3 861 M ,. Q` 7876 Z 7685 7866 7867 I 7835 1 4., B—2 z 7877 7854 7851 ..4 1 m 8 ^�� 7870 01 7821 ; ti j�, 7863 1 7842 7801 ; �' ).,gy p\ 7841 6' ' \ 7851 1 7830 7 7791 4: —3 ,, 7820 --R.'-3 R-4 ; ,4 �o N 7815 7 7781 " 7750 i 49' . If )� � 7810 ,� 7809 1 7800 �` ilfB-2 �� R 4 7801 7. *o� 7767 _ PUD .� ,1 '• .I.R-3 C`` ,E ti civ i 7761 7 p Area of senior ��� R3 7755 7 7723 R—2 ousing project - /• 77 . _ . tam , • ,y'7 7745 7 7715 , ' 7735 — -„ .- 'r� — �-�--7 771 i ' ^ ' 7711 N 77** • - —% i. .P ,4t 2 %, ry 7715 1 N i tt Co, - 'Qj . 7685 7692 PUD�Q B 2— 111::—_ • N r �+ 7ssoQP o- .. (7, .7% B-3 �� N IC Ct 768 7663 768 W N R ' N N J �p 7653 - 8'3 ti IND 1 R AI 7635 1 4. B—2 43 7601 SILVER VIEW 7575 ' -I N C* 0� hor.W N� 4 4 B-2 s PARK ;. 2N ♦ "CA 0 7565 -.01 N «1 N r art - Zoning Map Planning Case 530-98 Applicant: Rea life Cooperative of Mounds View N I ?1 Location: 7735 Silver Lake Road 06/09/98 TUE 10:35 FAX Z001 • • FAX TRANSMISSION Fax; To: Jim Ericson Date: June 8, 1998 Fax#: 612-784-3462 Pages: I, including this cover sheet. From: Mark Bishop Subject: 7735 Silver Lake Road COMMENTS: We will stili need the fire hydrant on the west side of the building/east side of Silver Lake Road. Rest of the plan looks good_ MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 552-98 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE SILVERVIEW ESTATES PUD FOR REALIFE COOPERATIVE OF MOUNDS VIEW, 7735 SILVER LAKE ROAD; PLANNING CASE NO. 530-98 WHEREAS, Realife Cooperative of Mounds View has requested an amendment to the Silverview Estates PUD to allow for the construction of a 77-unit cooperative living housing development, replacing a previously approved development for property located at 7735 Silver Lake Road and zoned PUD, legally described as follows: Lot 4, Block 1, Silverview Estates, Ramsey County, Minnesota WHEREAS, Chapter 1119 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that any amendment to a PUD be accomplished according to the guidelines established in and imposed by Chapter 1125 of the Municipal Code pertaining to amendments and conditional uses; and, WHEREAS, the applicant specifically seeks to amend Item 5 of the approved Silverview Estates PUD document which addresses the dimensional requirements of the PUD, by reducing the building setback to 23 feet; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Planning Application, dated 5/29/98 2. Zoning and Location Map 3. Applicant's Narrative, dated 5/29/98 4. Silverview Estates PUD, approved 12/8/97 by Resolution 5184 5. Site Plans, date-stamped 5/29/98 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the site plans dated 5/29/98 are consistent with and improve upon the Silverview Estates PUD and PUD document, approved 12/8/98. NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of a PUD Amendment to the Silverview Estates PUD for the Realife Cooperative of Mounds View. Planning Commission Resolution 552-98 Realife Cooperative of Mounds View PUD Amendment June 17, 1998 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 17th day of June, 1998 Gary Stevenson, Acting Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director SEAL N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDE V\DEVCASES\530-98\552-98.RES MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 553-98 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR REALIFE COOPERATIVE OF MOUNDS VIEW, 7735 SILVER LAKE ROAD; PLANNING CASE NO. 530-98 WHEREAS, Realife Cooperative of Mounds View has requested a development review for a 77-unit cooperative living housing development, replacing a previously approved site plan for property located at 7735 Silver Lake Road and zoned PUD, legally described as follows: Lot 4, Block 1, Silverview Estates, Ramsey County, Minnesota WHEREAS,.Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a development review be conducted for all commercial and industrial development within the City; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning.Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Planning Application, dated 5/29/98 2. Zoning and Location Map 3. Applicant's Narrative, dated 5/29/98 4. Silverview Estates PUD, approved 12/8/97 by Resolution 5184 5. Site Plans, date-stamped 5/29/98 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the site plans dated 5/29/98 are consistent with the Silverview Estates PUD and PUD document, approved 12/8/98 and recommended for revision by the Planning Commission 6/17/98. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of a development review for the Realife Cooperative of Mounds View, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan prior to the City Council meeting to show Red Splendor Crab trees in place of the Radiant Crabs as requested by the City Forester. 2. The applicant shall submit to staff, prior to Council review, the lighting plan for the site, which is to include the height of the light standards, fixture type, bulb wattage and footcandle readings that extend to the centerline of Silver Lake Road. Planning Commission Resolution 553-98 Realife Cooperative of Mounds View Development Review June 17, 1998 Page 2 3. Revise the utility plan to show a fire hydrant on the property between the parking lot and the east side of Silver Lake Road as required by the Fire Marshal. 4. Revise the parking plan to conform to a 30-foot setback from the property line fronting Silver Lake Road. 5. Revise the site plans to so that the NURP ponds do not extend into or encroach upon the delineated wetland area. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 17th day of June, 1998 Gary Stevenson, Acting Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director SEAL N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DE VCASES\530-98\553-98PC.RES RESOLUTION NO. 5243 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE SILVERVIEW ESTATES PUD AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR REALIFE COOPERATIVE OF MOUNDS VIEW, 7735 SILVER LAKE ROAD; PLANNING CASE NO. 530-98 WHEREAS, Realife Cooperative of Mounds View has requested an amendment to the Silverview Estates PUD and development review to allow for a reduced setback for the construction of a 77-unit cooperative living housing development, replacing a previously approved development for property located at 7735 Silver Lake Road and zoned PUD, legally described as follows: Lot 4, Block 1, Silverview Estates, Ramsey County, Minnesota WHEREAS, Chapter 1119 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that any amendment to a PUD be accomplished according to the guidelines established in and imposed by Chapter 1125 of the Municipal Code pertaining to amendments and conditional uses; and, WHEREAS, the applicant specifically seeks to amend Item 5 of the approved Silverview Estates PUD document which addresses the dimensional requirements of the PUD, by reducing the building setback to 23 feet; and, WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a development review be conducted for all commercial and industrial development within the City; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Planning Application, dated 5/29/98 2. Zoning and Location Map 3. Applicant's Narrative, dated 5/29/98 4. Silverview Estates PUD, approved 12/8/97 by Resolution 5184 5. Site Plans, date-stamped 6/18/98 6. Draft Brochure for Realife Cooperative of Mounds View 7. Memo from Fire Marshal, dated 6/8/98 8. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 552-98 and 553-98 WHEREAS, the City Forester has reviewed the landscape plan as submitted by the applicant and finds them, to be acceptable; and, Resolution No. 5243 PUD Amendment &Development Review June 22, 1998 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans and finds them to be acceptable with the addition of a fire hydrant between the parking lot and Silver Lake Road as shown on the site plans dated 6/18/98; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council, by revising Item 5 of the PUD Document approved 12/8/97, finds that the site plans dated 6/18/98 are consistent with and improve upon the Silverview Estates PUD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the Mounds View City Council approves the PUD Amendment to the Silverview Estates PUD and the development review for the Realife Cooperative of Mounds View, subject to the following stipulation: 1. The site plans will need to be redrawn to reflect the following changes: a. The grading and utility plan, which shall be labeled as such, shall be revised to show a fire hydrant as indicated on the site plan. The fire hydrant shall be shown to be linked to the existing water main on the west side of Silver Lake Road. b. The grading and utility plan shall be revised to show the exact and complete location and grading of the NURP pond behind the building. 2. The applicant shall obtain from Ramsey County access and grading permits for any and all proposed work in the county right of way and provide copies of such permits to the City for verification. 3. Before any City permits can be issued for this project, the applicant shall: a. Provide to the City three complete, full-size sets of final plans for its review and administrative approval. b. Sign off on a revision to the PUD document, approved 12/8/97, and the Developers Agreement, dated 4/20/98. Adopted this 22nd day of June, 1998 Duane McCarty, Mayor ATTEST: Charles S. Whiting, City Clerk/Administrator SEAL REALIFE COOPERATIVE OF MOUNDS VIEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW,MINNESOTA 29 May 1998 APPLICATIONS FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT OF SILVERVIEW ESTATES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW/SITE PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF SENIOR HOUSING COOPERATIVE Owner/Developer Realife Cooperative of Mounds View, Inc. 10895 Silver Lake Road Mounds View, Minnesota (612) 894-6511 Fax: (612) 894-6520 Contact: David Hanson,President Architects Attorneys Johnson, Sheldon& Sorenson Larkin,Hoffman, Daly&Lindgren,Ltd. Architects, Inc. 1500 Norwest Financial Center 10249 Yellow Circle Drive 7900 Xerxes Avenue South ' Minnetonka, MN 55343 Bloomington, MN 55431 Telephone: (612) 935-6337 Telephone: (612) 835-3800 Fax: (612) 935-0878 Fax: (612) 896-3333 Contact: Roger Johnson Contact: Bill Griffith Civil Engineer Charles Plowe Engineering 9180 Lexington Avenue Northeast Circle Pines, MN 55014 Telephone: (612) 785-1043 Fax: (612) 786-6007 Contact: Chuck Plowe 2. I. FACTORS CONSIDERED IN FORMULATION OF REALIFE COOPERATIVE OF MOUNDS VIEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT The information contained in this development narrative,together with the development plans for Realife Cooperative of Mounds View Inc. ("Realife"),have been prepared taking into consideration the following: 1. The location and boundaries of the site located within the Silverview Estates PUD generally southeast of the intersection of Trunk Highway 10 and Silver Lake Road on property legally described in the accompanying development applications (the"Property"); 2. Existing zoning and land uses surrounding the Property; 3. Existing characteristics of the Property; 4. The Mounds View Comprehensive Plan(District 1); 5. The effect of the development on the regional and local roadway network; Applicant's Interest Realife Cooperative of Mounds View, Inc. ("Realife") is the developer pursuant to a purchase agreement with the fee owners. II. THE PROPERTY Property Location and Boundaries The Silverview Estates PUD Plan is a"wedge-shaped" layout generally bounded by Highway 10, Silver Lake Road and the right of way for the St. Paul Waterworks (immediately north of County Road I). III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED REALIFE COOPERATIVE OF MOUNDS VIEW Senior Housing Cooperative The proposed senior housing cooperative(the"Project") offers people 62 years and older a housing alternative that is becoming increasingly more popular, that is, cooperative living. Cooperative housing is the ownership and operation of a housing development by those who live in it. It is a not-for-profit cooperative corporation with specially designed"Articles of Incorporation"and By-Laws." 3. Financing of the housing cooperative is provided by members' equity(through their share purchases) along with a HUD insured 40-year blanket mortgage or conventional mortgage for the project. Cooperative members are in effect their own landlords,thereby enabling the Cooperative to be built and operated at an affordable cost. The mortgage program requires each project to conform to constructions and operational standards established by HUD. A cooperative is a unique form of home ownership. The corporation holds title to the dwelling units and directly assumes the mortgage,tax and other obligations necessary to finance and operate the development. This relieves the individual members of any direct liability for those items. Members support the cooperative through their occupancy agreements. This eliminates the necessity for each member to be an individual mortgagee under the mortgage contract. The cooperative approach to housing has been successful largely because it provides a housing alternative very much like continuing home ownership. In cooperative ownership,the pride of its members results in a strong interest in maintaining the property and participating in shared management. The first senior cooperative housing project in Minnesota was"7500 York"in Edina. Occupancy of"7500 York"took place in October of 1978. Many of the original residents still reside at"7500 York." Cooperative housing residents normally occupy their apartments longer than renters do. They become better acquainted with their neighbors and learn to work together for the general good of the people and the building. Proposed Development Plan Realife Cooperative of Mounds View will consist of 77 cooperative living units in one three- story building(the Building). Underground parking is provided in 78 stalls. This is more than sufficient for the daily parking needs of all the residents since not all residents will own cars. In addition, surface parking is provided in 25 stalls in the center of the development site. Total parking on site exceeds the PUD requirement; at 103 stalls,the average parking is 1.34 stalls per unit. In addition,the cooperative will operate a mini-bus which will provide two round trips per day to and from local services, such as medical offices, shopping and public facilities. Finally,residents will have access to public transit, such as Metro Mobility, and local buses. Access and Traffic Characteristics Vehicular access to and from the development will be from Silver Lake Road. Two driveways will provided circulation in and out of the site, and into the underground parking area. The parking and circulation design incorporates an interior loop drive to accommodate emergency vehicle access to the Property. The Developer will work with the City's Fire Marshal and Engineer to develop the final parking design and access to Silver Lake Road. 4. Trip Generation Trip generation rates for senior housing are very low. Daily trips will be approximately.5 trips per day per unit. In addition,bus, service and taxi trips will add approximately 15 trips per day. Therefore,total average daily trips for the development will range from 55 to 75 per day. Trip generation for this land use is significantly less than any other commercial or residential development. In addition, senior housing has different peak hour characteristics than office and commercial uses. The greatest concentration of trips do not occur in the PM Peak hour. Trip generation is within the existing capacity of adjacent roadways.No substantial increase in traffic is projected for local and regional roadways as a result of approval of Realife Cooperative of Mounds View. IV. STORMWATER,UTILITY,AND LANDSCAPING PLANS Stormwater Drainage The majority of the site drainage is by catch basins and storm sewer which is directed to a proposed water quality pond located at as feature in the front setback of the development, as well as the water quality pond in the rear of the development. The location and size of water quality pond will be consistent with the PUD Plan and will be coordinated with adjacent development. Utility Connection Sanitary sewer will be provided to this site with a connection to the sanitary sewer now under construction from Trunk Highway 10. Water service to this site will also be provided with a connection to the water line now under construction from Trunk Highway 10. Stormwater ponding and storm sewer will be as shown in the approved PUD plan. Landscaping All landscape planting requirements are as shown on the Landscape Plan. All requirements of the City's Ordinance will be met, consistent with the PUD plan. V. BUILDING DESIGN The proposed building is of a three story serpentine design over a one story precast concrete garage. The design allows for numerous types and shapes of units and allows the structure to be viewed as a smaller scale product than actual dimension. 5. The garage area itself is designed as a one way diagonal parking structure to ease the amount of turning and backing and to create a much safer traffic environment. The garage has three (3) hour fire rated construction and has a fire suppression system for user safety. The three story structure above has, in addition to the units, common areas such as a great room with serving kitchen, storage cubicles, craft and exercise areas, lounges, and several guest rooms. The building is served by two elevators, fire stairwells and is divided into several compartments with area separation walls. The building is sprinkled and has heat and smoke detectors for user safety. From a comfort standpoint,the building utilizes a high energy efficient envelope including 2x6 walls, insulated glass at windows and sliding glass doors and an R=44 roof insulation. The exterior of the building has face brick on the lowest level, and uses a heavy duty vinyl siding on areas above the first story windows. The decks have roofs over them and a heavy duty shingle will be utilized. VI. • CONSISTENCY OF REALIFE COOPERATIVE OF MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH THE MOUNDS VIEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING ORDINANCE, AND SILVERVIEW ESTATES PUD PLAN Comprehensive Plan The Silverview Estates property is located in the City Center district established by the Mounds View Comprehensive Plan(District 1), and is located at the northern gateway to the City's commercial core. The City has previously approved: (1)the concept plan for the PUD designating the location of allowed uses,and (2)the development stage plan containing the detailed components of the PUD as set out in plans, dated, December 1, 1997. Zoning The City's zoning map, dated May 1996, classifies the Property in the Limited Business District (B-2). Since publication of the zoning map,the City has taken action to reclassify the Property "Planned Unit Development." It is understood that the uses designated by the PUD take precedence over the B-2 classification shown on the zoning map. 6. Allowed Uses The PUD concept plan includes the following uses: Parcel 1 Gas station/convenience 6,500 sq. ft. max market Car wash 3,000 sq. ft. max RV Dump Station Parcel 2 Office building 25,000 sq. ft. max Parcel 3 Office building 5,000 sq. ft. max Parcel 4 Senior housing 115,800 sq.ft. max PUD Site Data Impervious Pervious Gas station/convenience market/car wash 1.33 ac 0.30 ac Office building 1.43 ac 0.69 ac Office building 0.28 ac 0.83 ac Senior housing 1.31 ac 6.86 ac* Total 4.22 ac 8.68 ac (Total Site Area= 13.0 ac) (32.7%) (67.3%) *This total includes the wetland and St. Paul Waterworks ROW Dimensional Requirements Setbacks-Buildings Highway 10 & Silver Lake Road 30 feet(') Private drive 15 feet Interior lot lines 0 feet'2' Wetland 100 feet(3) St. Paul Waterworks 30 feet Setbacks-Parking Areas Highway 10 10 feet(6) Silver Lake Road Parcell 20 feet Parcel 4 27 feet Private drive 10 feet(4) Interior lot lines 0 feet(2) Wetland 100 feet(3) St. Paul Waterworks 30 feet Building Heights(4) 7. Gas station/Convenience store 28 feet max Car wash 28 feet max Senior housing 3 stories;48 feet max Office 32 feet max Parking Requirements° Gas station 4 spaces+2 space per service bay Car wash 5 spaces in stacking lane Convenience store 4 spaces per 1000 sq. ft. of GFA of retail sales area/0 spaces for storage space Senior housing 1 space/unit+.15 spaces per unit with a minimum of 1 space covered per unit Office 1 space per 250 sq. ft. of GFA Deviations from the PUD Plan The building has been designed to conform to the senior rental building approved in the PUD Plan with two minor deviations: 1. The building structure will strictly meet the approved setback;however,the provision of decks will exceed the setback by six feet. 2. The northwest and southwest corners of the building will be four feet closer to Silver Lake Road than the building footprint approved in the PUD Plan. VII. CONSISTENCY WITH REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES The Metropolitan Council Regional Blueprint describes efforts to "expand life-cycle housing opportunities" as a critical policy direction for the region. (See,Blueprint, 1994 "Executive Summary.") Metropolitan Council actions will give priority to regional infrastructure investments or expenditure of public dollars to communities that have implemented plans to provide life-cycle housing opportunities. (See,Blueprint,page 56.) Well before the Blueprint was adopted,the Metropolitan Council Housing Development Guide forecasted the current demand for what is described as"life-cycle"housing. Traditionally, housing has been constructed in two types: (1) apartments for young people just starting out and (2) single-family homes for couples with children. Today,there is grater variation in housing types responding to life-cycle changes. The"empty nesters"category includes married couples whose children have grown. The empty nester often desires to move to a townhome in part,to alleviate home maintenance and other responsibilities. This cycle may also include older persons living alone,who cannot continue home maintenance. It is the responsibility of metropolitan- area cities to plan for a variety of housing types to meet the life-cycle needs of its residents (Metropolitan Council Housing Development Guide,p. 17). 8. In 1985,the Metropolitan Council looked at the effect of changing demographics in the Twin City area housing market. The population of the area is expected to grow by almost five percent between 1990 and the year 2000 and by over 16 percent between 1980 and 2000. The major demographic changes are due to the aging of the baby boomers,who will be between the ages of 20 and 54. Large increases in the middle-age and empty-nester categories are projected; and corresponding large decreases in the adult categories between the ages of 20 and 34 are also projected. An average of 7,000 new housing units a year are projected between the years 1990 and 2000. The impact of projected demographic trends on housing includes a large decline in the typical renter and first-time home buyer age groups, and continued increases in the older housing age group. The empty-nester category is projected to grow by 32.3 percent between 1990 and the year 2000. The growth will result in increasing demand for housing alternatives such as the senior housing cooperative. (Sources: "Looking Ahead at Housing" The Effect of Changing Demographics on the Twin Cities Area Housing Market, "A Report of the Metropolitan Council, September, 1988; "Housing Markets in 2000: Prototypes of the Region's Communities,"A Report of the Metropolitan Council, 1989.) The Project is designed to respond to the demand for life-cycle housing created by the changing demographic trends cited by the Metropolitan Council and City of Mounds View. Empty nesters and people of retirement age will find the development a convenient and desirable alternative to single-family home living. Amenities and services provided in conjunction with the development are designed to attract and retain this market niche; including the provision of common maintenance of buildings and grounds. In addition,the basic, single-level floor plan is convenient and accessible for residents with mobility constraints. Increasing demand for this housing product has been demonstrated in Mounds View and surrounding communities. In fact, the majority of prospective buyers will come from existing residents within five miles of the site. VIII. SUMMARY OF RATIONALE SUPPORTING APPROVAL OF PUD PLAN AMENDMENT The following is a summary of the rationale in support of the Project: 1. The Project provides affordable senior housing in an area of the City that is best suited for this type of development. 2. The Project meets a clear demand for housing alternatives for an aging population. 3. The Project is in a location that is close to services required by seniors who will be eligible to purchase ownership in the housing cooperative. 4. The Project will provide open space in conformance with the City's plans for the PUD. 9. 5. The Project will be developed with minimal changes to the approved PUD Plan for senior housing. 6. The Project does not propose to fill wetland or floodplain areas. 7. The Project can be developed within the capacity of existing roadways and utilities. 8. Regional and local policies support the development of a range of housing options. 9. The Project will be developed in a campus like setting coordinating access, landscaping, open space and other elements with the adjoining commercial,office, and retail development now in the planning or development stages within the PUD. In summary,the plans for the Project have been designed to complement nearby commercial and retail uses. There is no fill or grading proposed for wetland areas. Multi family senior housing is proposed in an area that is best suited for such development. The development directly satisfies the goals and objectives of the City with regard to protection of wetlands and surrounding open space. 10. IX. REALIFE COOPERATIVE OF MOUNDS VIEW SITE DATA Dwelling Units 77 Site Areas Square Feet Acres Gross Site Area 355,885.00 8.17 Building Site Coverage 35,514.00 0.82 Floor area: 106,542.00 Floor Area Ratio 0.30 Density 9.5 Units/acre Parking Underground 78 Above Ground 25 Total 103 Average 1.34 stalls/unit • 0400738.01 11. ON Ci m m M m O) w L 4C L C O' 00� ON . CO C CO m w- O C al C Co o 'CO p w er !° m i a5 0 C O +O+ C N- O o0 o G (0 O �- 7 0 m O p as C 0 .- 0 0 0 Z w m u) `.0 C cuf!) .. V d �. G.o- a. - Z W O Air 0 ` — .2." 3 O •N a) w0. 0) m o 3 Q 5 w O m u) 0-. m m .c E to a) w 'C R w y W a`) cami � cv � � E �'m5. c ° m ` mC) > V ..a 1 = 00000 . t0 OC .0 y mc= OOA RI 0m VismCC/- 0 = ccwm0as .- X � 6 — l z 0 u) 0 0 fl 0 41) V N r c O v • ao mmi 00050Co .tea ._ - c _ 0 .�] � C� +- c - i0 c a, U) ccc 0 UJ ash O O. O C C po) >..0 m 0 m ai o` a) 0 0 >.�. a � � Cl 6 .. .r` o -o � r� c0mc � � WAO O7,u� fOVN � 2m mt ,r5 N0 ami ? .6U tom, C c0 M 0 O 0 y = O O V y a3 as co) J' 0 0 .mc � 3 �.0 9 = a m asp ma) rr a A W H LU = a) m ' y c o as o = o Z V m >, 0 •C OYw m .r as .,__.(0 Co as in O tcp (DascJc > asmcnQ ,- >.l. cm > 0 W t0 u) 1, O m I 0 GO m L 10 " N o m m .-.4 O m o- V d co co � c > u) o 3 0 me- Z n c m c D > E C c7 L ... 7 O 7, O Z 3 t C • D O 3N a) aap- 0 'aZ 72 04:I ar = 0C • V w = m E 00 4- 0 0 >. co U) 0 al co 0 .y w C m • 0 L' O c 0 � ° '` CO , c ° - s = m asoZ c c v as ..- C Z m O .c m 70 co:o m c c0 V) m X m co >.+- ns c as as C o -,_.S. as ti1 E-• `t' c .. w c V �mi a0 ,.y .7. NI • .CL .0 a E"+ fWW~ �6 C- - 0 vD m .` c`0 4- O C O Z . 0) O = W p,,, m to :E Ph --5- ,. c _ c c co ...chi; c 'E 4>a y 1- a. 15 �„ '� cctsm HO J aC mr= c ~ Oo mai ms ww c 0 m 'a O A co" w A- I-'• I•- c�0 N I•- u0- to O W so N V 0 = N O w N 0 A a 1 0 .1'3.64-.L.04.0c. e•wLr:.a..Lru anom.•+.taw ; • a000MISY3 SQ /Q' , • I FTI is//L S S fi S 1 a 3 j, E-• �s' a" [+ W } ,-.414 .Ir' Y a a� 3015AN WIS , ' ' 1 - :..3 *7;17' _ r' ,'` �r ,1 . 3.• ci °'rte ~ w �.•, n „ � / F' A a C *•`'�' 1 2 v - -' — Wcrl 4 • L \';'/. 'i1,I. 1Lea Y• Fs: i 3 V.I. W ' � ` •s - /r '` tDC. ;14 a w a •tm.. . ," _,JNO r • ? .r•a r•- by •-, API, • 44 AO. - [� r � � OO i , "1_` {it Wp r a 'lOa a W N W o �� as 2; �/4• _ •• 1PN aid ^ . lniltil+a IA v1 N O. Ca C 00 rn cu sL. O a) Q a, = ca. z z x 0 LI' a L. � wow E E w o LI) 4 � W cn ° Oto ul > 0 U W N a) w N cu • w R V ° 0 0 0 CO a°,U) 4v' z E E �; E c� YO � � ° toxo w w .+ .+ .+ .+ 1" w w a) ) C. 0 O C.r u) O w a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) al a) a) m 'C a) co La co A U a) a) a) al a) Li a) 0 a) a) a) 2 w ) 00 Nu) " o + � N w 01.0000 0 OtiOOOM COLO N N } ,C Q� C O L. E' CI) O M N N r- 0 N N C') Cr) N •N N O ` p, w CO O Co0 U O U V ) > 'J.r CO CL C. CO 0 C.'E C. A w N U w13 •�iu) uJ N ul c ° • to Nt ul e-- E — m ° ° 0w V; Y o RI V 6 cn a, •cr 0) ,. u) Q u) N • c C > 0 ` a) m 0 Ts 65 u) t4 o 4 C .e w F al °� m c a) CII ° a) a) of o ° a) C x z 'tA 10 .r 1 0 a) > .. a) 7 m 0. C C O C.3 CO F � a E a? 0 03 03 03 3 E vw? o ca `� a a) c N ° o a) as O 0 JO a3 .0 -0s a) ca co 0 'c r. a. coU, 3 .c o • v, 3 6. c c c) W EQ., W a) .�•c w °� • a) .21.E a. a- ••c w a) .: S c, co al E co O CO 0 0 E tn � It) (') I L Cr) CO2cn O � � 65 m (DOcn0 Os000 co O 0 a - - Q L I X x w ° O • 'E c4 X ca > A rn w: :� C N x x E z 3wo Na) a) mcw E E EE 21 ul > E .' c C N ,.a ° w Ec ° 6. a ° a c- u) C• •- u, 0 a = a) 0 o °.•— 0 E u) N U) w O O V V V V C) o 0 cr N 7 t 'E CO ,� 0 O O O C COO G N CQ as CQ C4 M N F L.Tog p CT co N C la O to O N ems- a) M COO CMO CO CSO 1� -C z 0 � � � E � C i � CO M NtnCO � a- 000 (0 Com 2 w U p O O ,-3,- ) O CII = a) O. c E a) -F) ° EU c m w m ow Nc — a`) a) a) oE O a O E = w N = .-- C O U U C) C) U - w CII = C u) y N ul a) COXI c CO 00 cv CII c o O W co CD cn 13 0 Ll_ A a� Ew 'O0. MNM NCV• L O C O � U C = 03 N C - -a .9- 0 C a) C A a _c c a) m c7,-.0 :— -6 c ° w Vl C O E ' -c s C co o a) 13 .-� C o cuO C C o o cts C. E cs C) 0) C 'a` CCa - 000 co _ ,2) • 0 � 0 ... cc .— O w n Q-'N > Ew. � � � o 0 baa E 0 a) a. eel c-a = 4) t_C6 aOas> O ,C) R ,a) 01E� aL U N O v] O� 00 � a) °'=aE ° L � r u) m3 = Noo 0 0 H � c w• .a O Q , o ul a) O N C ` 0 t) O •C *C � ur Q Q H caaiOc (afn -vtnc cuocu > E a) a) II a) F n) a) ° :a `. NM ° w g -c- C0 c) UCLOOcn c N a, `i' � wui �' ami .. c 3 >°, 3 '� O `0ccc a) c wL7 3 � w ° Ea0 ID °ioc � cY G ° c"ed se 550 a) as `_' 00 O > O L a) C.fn .. R tT ° V ryy' N M ° V s (n 0 C4> n N a vl ul a) • y o 0 a) O 0 U C 8 C .. -1 • O CQ y w N w QQQ- = ca>> � Eco) mco) °' co 0 eEaa)) o ° j aoO eiQZ c ° '0 .6 R ° 3 cam mi 0 OOu) F— b * viNa C -C � 0000 C w (0C 13 y 4) II 'a c V 7 � O CU CD h Opp" D U c O N _ a) c Lx ca *E a N c u) 3 0 a) sfl a) O R .� v! .c .� W w m e 0 c ca v) m p_0 10 O Z w ?3 — N ti C 1— uJ c) ". `- L �, L W .0 a) 0.1.- a) a) `�-3 w D. d 't.1 N N N c > z z co > O. ° N N O -CI M a) co 0 m 'C y ••c as U as 3:1— E ° ca- O 44 w u) C O — ct :. t m - c1 cQ a) a- oUn c 0 c =in Q cl O o .r co ow. c ui of ai s c.) o c • v .a W 35Q = 1:110 v) ,E '(3 u) ° s c o = Q-- -a € `n m � c HOZ c ° cN al °� o � � °'>, o c € aa 3O Q0p a) •E ° vv) �, a) a`) (-NG OS Y 'o N 7 c 7 N N E m u= V R rn G..L 0 o cY+Ill O io = c .«. ci0 � a) � a) yaai � � rna) � o..S � mwZOw c a) oc1� swoo a) L - ca c �. •v6 � c 'Ec U a0U >. o rn N t of n. n. :II •o 'E ° _ m a. - z .c _-0 :.. u) 0ti c cco �° � •. �.Q ° o ,.. o ° rn ° E ns � co) �0) > P o E _ as .c to co) 13 Q0 � °) > 01 cI-- W E o ° wG40 N 0 o 2 L (') E Q. L. ,.. 7 7 N O I- ° c 3 ca >,,,,0 p•, ° ,.,., i--i U d � �' au5 �ts ° c rn3 v n c °) v) °-._ •°) CD CA c 2 ° > � p• a- N 0 ,c 7 U N w w O — a N O c a) ' u) 'v ca O f O A W H a y >, ° .cEY m u) c v! N a) N ° a) � C0 _a aU O m ° U c cw `° � c > V CO caw `° Nm °. > ,awe oa -o a) -2 N o coo` co 3' a) 0cco cca •vEc CO 0 ,,o '" ° a) > 0 � ., O V a co C CLu) � '11 cl 2 a) a) Q. > w C�+-' (!) NU0R d) c 5 L "- .0 -p n. 3 0, I... Vv) U > L co a) 7 u) u) w y co ,- O. O a) c c n0_0 0 E mo. c a) 3 � °- y1.- v E c� c c ° a) c a) v, u°i o o co :.. ocat ,_ et) rirna) .' `nyE ca) o w3 ca0 O --Q U co O t'a N c 1, G..= N c :Q c a) ° y 0 0) C no R O 0 - ° a a) � o co o. c o o CA Z o a, u) i. •II � o.•- .c o .0 w cca N V 3 m Q, N 0 � a) � �' vc � c. c c 3a �' 'a) a .,. 3 o v) cn _ x Z a3i , c` D c_ cc N c ac) 0a. -°00 E .al . aa)) = a) > o iii .4.. ... ca oc c oecto N oz Cel a •> ac m _ ami c ° E N co •c o u))cn a>i co --0 ° ° c 0 a v c.- 3 ur �av � E� O cm C c 7 Q, of _a m a) m = c a) 1 a) A O a) O L " w Hw a) 0 ° � mca °' o TAa) in m1Y `aoca'a c3o ,- co at0 >, 0 - a`) > W >r.11 co ■ F=- -3U .5r n.0 ■ tiao _ •°v y I- o m2U ■ a. o c.) ,- > as .O � E 0 Ox A a w E-, C4 6 cyan • � y .8m > A cl) o o 4.... c m w > co �E � O yaa)azCD 0.1 a0 al d O za) h '' a) � °U .5 c .a .r ° ° ° , yaEE3Qa a ` a aCC O c > ., , ° ) fir • CO E-»z 13 •Z ZU 'Q a m • m -0mmp N.. E � C 'cm � �041Nmm CO 03 Ncy0. 0) � . 3 o 6. ag . ca � ca � y °qO °ECD c a m t13 . ? w� . 03 m a a) c = )"ct a) y E 0 m0 a < da . o � q _ Em Aao v) O. - - W , '5 = ccac y c d - zu.; am E-i p4 V -0c • O 4 > � m O c C R t :: m :° Q m E a O 'c ot ° y 0 m > O •c O ma 0 Q. cA , .3 Z1 .52oW y4 o 0y � c Q) 'C m > O 1 0 C -- CD V ya) Oa .9c O yh. 00 CE 03c1. ., Ea) E 'em = Oyt .) a 03 c) 0. � > vcm ° LL Cm .0 yca 00 a mm '= a ° y c O —. i m Yo c •c = 1 "cm O a) 4. / y . m + E . 0 W $ • Oy 44d° c40 ° ac `m a1). S.4.: ° 8Qa1) 2 = " m CO E m c c , = c c c � E330 cam CvO � �0CO . -0 (4 E � ar.ca ' oc � ° am k ' yom . ac 13 "4-0 nW a. oe ° cc = c ,cm3 C7 m c O. a) yi ° •° ZaEzm > � c aWcoa) 00 c0) E U O q • c) a) O � ia -4, y .E w c -c caX 'C c CO •E0vaa) • •_ cC 3 a � alm (. > O O ° .0 c ca aQa E U • r ° 1Qm O mro a4E c C • C:.. — L N,_ c •_- Cc4r-- CO 0 m ym • y O 0 W 0 Z W Wc -= ° E v)m W3 W m Lm oo Z° 3.2.- c1 .c m ,m Z 3v aW = > c 3cmn ° .ori -� 0) h ? oQND 0 o m ca • 3 -ca . mc3m ....`° '0)- Ccna Iii O v.. t 'Q m c C cu .c L -. ON Q O U ° .. m ca ._ .. .0 w' 0 O 'n = o - C CV yl ~ Ul a_ N C 42 00 13 C j �, 0 y Owl CO h 00 m V C m 'C U' a c 2 E cmO N :a m .0 c w 0 Z c4 m m m O O m ' �p 0 cu H y >' y L , y y ' U o Z W "' ccc yw `•'L. A E � t`� N a a ad m nt •y a c ca ° cII m W O - 2 a. u) C) 0 i ° cII - L a a'~ t O m c m ,_ A a'L c ��-+ ul c C O N u' LV' , a--- - Ein y° awL `vel C.U - ° m 'c V a U cC m a �1 m N O C r O C) 0 ` "a O ._ L w U' N ..7 W y m — y o 00A E .a ° .4- 0 -Pc ... T O C = C > 'c9 L m y '> 0 ° o 0 •E .E LL. `41 > OL 7 m a E > m O > W Z y -iii o- us LZ` `— 0 TA 0 `� 0 0 C) a' � ° C alw 3 m m ° O C > N c U 12 >'+•' C O C�) 'm_Q 'c • L- > m C m a m c y O a W E. m m co 3 O c4 L ._ V O -- O ) (4 L •C O Cal m y O U cu -0 , y a) •-• a) ,� O •C ° 2 .0 c ` -0 O as E a) .. m +' cv a .� ,.. �, y .N y L O MOLL. C c .. C m C Cf m �... a ca C c a (fl o c °n.o m % C ° yw 19I c cl •°c c o � (1) "0° � E c cv ,° °� 3E" Cmm � 2am Amo oam w o. ;.T4 E' C E WHO ° _E = m rn alC "CI Q m m � U c > ° '� m m c c ° c y CU c pc cco0 o . `~ %v„ .0 m L *-6 a-5 •aL « o mu) -Z' y o c cn C .y C a (04101- >.•-•3 c mcc ow . ) -E, 2 0 . f.D.. . >' >'p6 >' m 6 >'w C 0 0 3 -0'°- 3 C' A W U -, Cu cn a m m 3 L = �, m y L ° O R ° m .0 a • L L 'v' Z c y m c •`a U) y R E � O.a44)) 0 ~ u' 0-w o' a' o N • 0 C c2� 0 W :a -owl- c4 � :° � wm Qcm = UE. EC -C pscco ° a? 303aL0 > C cII m c VI m CU C-13 m -=,„ w m .c L m t O L •C u) O L 0, m E U L 0 0) 4 A 0 " L ° N c`v U) cj c°a y .r - a � "-' >'H co mcL c0 c •9 >' C 3 Z R = •C o y - y L- ,;143 .4)) .4- ,, ,u- c:° 0 0 c .n C 0 O z •Qca V ` m —ii, _O c � .c ami o c CU 2 a° ar) a o c al a y C - EV Q 0 cn a) E oL = 2 moy : .. ° o ay 151.3 ° ',- cpmo > € " CY C1, cn ` a a- � cv y m c o ma -n V N w m 22 .c .- '8 22 mw cQ y .QC R > ca... 0 ' O W iso = ° c � ai � ymvai cmvLc°iaamo :. cmi � m ° mLmc Ex• O- IIcmEca a_ 0o .n9 ° nL " cc° c � m in -c' .- c y" wa m C ._ E � e ° a' m 'C c •`—° me v3' rnc° 2 ;� c 2 E c •cp E � ° o ami caz E.. €ti) .5 _— c3 acv E 0 E C 0 -0R � g o -- a m -� .... a'— mw- m A Qi O ~ = .m. c cu m N m m y •y C y C E v' O L y C O -J . co cu C' > O O Cl- W E-. W c m L m L . m µ- m .. C ._ = L m 0 a. m o E 0 Con > CO -a 3 y U) I- C = () L O 0 � U) C C y o 1.. ° m Qi < a a.0 -0 a�.1 W W a c..4 E-. a.a. > m > A c `m >' S > °> C o a)aw >„ W am -0 m o o ZI.: ca .a w C ,CCo 00302 tc6 FL- O fl- QC =� °- in N O m C � >'. o � U a>iw -g .. R a c cam m m0 0)-0 o .tea .. c Q . o c - D .. c — ca 1.- 0.4 w 8 •- 1... z'L m m O m > y 2 w y c >►L Q• L o cnO m Eal V CO >+ E = am c am y m cn R m ° E~ moac) i3mc > c ~ E � a m_ gEo = 20 aXic1- 3co.4) zw aa• a3'" oaI 2 ° . 0tt CV > � c� oE Cif ° 0 � OL ° tcyaci c al o 3 4) ° E a? 'N m 3 ;� -ma m ° c ° ° y > - � L � `- C C °' C^� U ._ O yco OLS Q 'v > WtaCo0. m � cC ' ' -II . Vl Q. N O /II C mm d C • 7 R .. .-. L �.r O Q 0 = 0 ° OC a . •wGU . N 0wN w- c4m m m � ,� > > tRmc cmm° om > o -� 2 ° ' COa* �€ � ._ � oL .y m m ° € ° C cp L p_ ° yC.1 o0ym j m re° ,C mOmVU m pym.pE LLD i COo .._ - Um e •- •� , ° t- W col.0 a mc asC = T3 ° aO ` mwc " E m > y . c � 2 a' c a• o iii � all c � ECov � a_ il.- � v • �CO o .c Q c < C� vyon . � = � -oo co ° vcoN . r ` - mocCQn . c) Ra EA ma y o u' > Er �U 0 0-• w Eac:. c ° C C . a mL y0L a. co rno c -a51.) W Cr) m0 ° caa' acuw Qc cu r wm . C p _O m o 0n CCw ° : O L C w O O m C • a Cu 0 CU o C ' ° 0 c `cCNEm °)- C al R ° 8 ° '3 o - m m o >'- `i . c) m .0 o o = ° ° U .E 2 ° mce lm `- c a. ZI w. ca WoC > � • ym mo ° oZ � y> 3o � °' a) ° c ' mct- � 00ix wNom � >6a) ua) � 0 ccy � cIINoa) W c 0 E ? Ey �" 00 m > � 00 -- � c ; :c4a 0 U17 aa ° 0- 0 a ° 0 m .072 0> 0 c0 . 0-- E) ° ° .. 0 sdOct .4- act -04) -s- m .v ° > ° ° O m E G0a O -s •E O «_ L .0 V m c N y m °° ma0 ( 0 .2 .g e C W N W ocaO. ma� ya= > E2 Rte ° ° m C O ° yoc > 7 'coca L CmOEmm '� m O .. L C L c ° m I«. oQ. n■ OVacoI- Ocuaa._ ° VEU) ■ C �) 0aaL 1... UN.: Zm ° a00O C) N a. m a) iii 7.n m 0) O hon ON IA 00 Q., .ras 92 •N N O 0) m U .4 .r L !n O 7) ".-c•L -a .,. 7.p o C ~ C '� m m C a 'C 0N N O '� 92 7 C N t w En 'n 00 c m � Eo m o o. D E- 4 92 5 w Er � v 3L � w zzw ca 92 0vLvv -0 m � U `- �+ a .7. N o �� ami w0 � aaico o •C � ami .c3 w . >. a w `L° c ° ° �' a�) .acacE dew m m L O TA co m 3 ... L C O co CuN � < O 92 � X C 7.°n 0 C 0 c ., •- rn ca 8 v -0L 92 92 ° v C70A •... 7 L 92 92 ca M fl- �' 7.n m ... C v'�-- .L-. of v C m Cii m C O w w y L CO O 0 a) l 0 92 92 E O m O w a 'v o C 0 .• E � .: a' ac ° v1C y = m m V3 OU cvi� � 0 .. c ... aOC .Ca0imEaCi ° 92 .- ... >. 0 0O w. IIy 00 -4. 3 d0U ° m �; > y O -0 (/) 1 O Cu Q to Cu 0 C c > 3 l0 N L O a - z m C� co m m Q O o ..= C V n1 �4 E E a II '3 0 6. o.Q a L. m c g-`°c. a• c Q-c`°- N N c° 4) w r[t ti O a) -0 > = 01 CD O C C a m � �, ON L N N c4 LLL C �+ .tm. w0 Tm C "' > m V/ c6 ••C .r m ` �" u� o 2 'n c5 00 a)- `n .. � L oc � ° yo t 0 ca c c o c Cis cp Ya N � v V 6 _. � 0 •C as c � •Ta' c ao 0 - OCC -- .13) N Z 01 > `° c°amo �: y oc � c on.a > cumi .5 � wmrn WO m mc. c. 0 C � iaO '� � .„, No � ca0 ... Ymw v) '-' o ca �-t-.0. m �'L > Qo o 0 ct a v .1) ce oo ca E.4 "4 L U Cly ca U C m of ca "'' 0 ID "' O. C C ."' L. L 3 U W ci c •N o` 1... w 0 E Qo o a O Cr•C ca .c 'CX •- C o ml- co L70A ,„so 8o UmpEocUc0CLal �� m � mc.'� � o x ?A � 3 � Z O H c m > 0 0 0 C. 0 - .. •C x O m 0 m 3 fY O V) ca 0 L .0 N t c y N € m m .� - O M C C ° 0 (..) .cnV 3 m •cc3.,.' .. ala. m � 0C c- � 0cn � 00V0 ,daOU rnL > • .0 d •aLU m ° •y m iii ca -0 0 E 73Y a? o ca m � ›L... a ~ m ,' m rn ma) m 0V c -C 0 C 0 0o. - 3 m = 3 g >+O 'Q coco 0 0 .0 0 .- u) Ea O E O C 6 D_0 .� = m •n c .. L N rn ca w iWi C.) v 3 3 c. 03 Cu c •= m o .. ca H ur c - oc > v *E ,._-c ani = ct m E > " C > N t .. t H 0 >, p y O)-5 •C ca (II L L 0 CU'SW C _ > _ 44 )-t o U ' 3ca �, asw cauicc ca = m E U .0 CL amicioo mm017NN c, ccC -C NO.-mnu `° y0 � � L E � m � a> cac3c0 � v, o. � 14 '4•- Coal �a C " 0c 0 4.1 'C O u! 01 m 'Q m 0 y ° .0 0 O 1._ -a 0 `c.cEo ° Ew'• '- 0a� o0= c.c > "" IX c. E2 > cc 3m 0 Q O > L_ 17 C m oarn 'C N 0 0 e `_ Cf m> = m ) 2 V 5 3 coo m w ,,;• A my m cL < Zii e c aci '- a4,, 4, 4, a13 �'i m` �° � 0 a0 0 1C .- =I° TA 0 3 0 `� E y.c as > m e a ami c E 0 3w o ac) L _ m > (� c 0 c 44 E� ° � .' •N m �� w o .0 `U CU .. 0 c c o w. m 0 OE w O 0 m . w c4 w H u! tl) >10 c O N O)R O C C c. c`6 0 x w m• U c 0 N c.) p c o 0 0 _00o0 - moo '_ ° c 5 : o o ° .. 0 E E.., U) p) m .0 of C m = - m '-' • a, O E m - ::' m c cn ,7 W A.' ' C CO •en to as 0 > .N +% > m > 5 -a > O c`a m a m m Oill CL O O 0 m m E 0 c d N. � 'ti E .a. y m . O a.la' 0- E c � m n' o13 m E •c " U � VI al w E-1 W = - o N c. co L vi u! 0.al a ° O .0 2 Q• m r m 0 0 •�L L 03 4, Q) > W > .0a V m E ca v- I- m ._ < c. < 0 a < I- av, .Q I- st .«•• 32 .5 aDI- m c) m 0 3A a 6 I m d A is w: ,� m .0 w a, >, mco � co m - 3ccu � z cn ° cnEcncc� cN0m octc n C c vs t� ,� o. Q� �1 r m L R N y co m ._a) 0 O a > m a°i3E330i-' c� 3 `om > s (7) 0).c � w 13 m a °-�� •� of cm arc 3 Q CV E `� W cn C m CU L L .0U) 'p E" C 0 m 0 0 m 020000 +L: N O L .� O V U :- ._ .-. CL O ..' ._ = ..' _ - w � vi mx0vJc mai0c 'vE `� a) m Zw J C •C L. = m o m - m 3 L w m .0 - 0 L we m m -0 m c.- O C - 0 ._ O C . U c. ,� CL m C L = p� m O N V E N O ca N E - m o m Cl) co cn -- .c 2 0 E � ... ° aa' c c '� Q � w a ow � � a-° 3 y 0 o• aO. . " v 0 al 0) m �'g " cz.lOw V � U 0 .Nmo in Q L V C 3• • O � a cC .0 N C � c wx � �'• •� VOE °, �•� y2 0L0 _c _ccc 'Q ca gz0i3o Aa w U N O O U 3 0 m " L V L al t_ E w -0 O 0 > d m � ,O ,00 c � w s o ai a0ic � c o` U a) ascNa � � v -00 0.4/a.5 0- 0 N c c 0 0� > m - a) 0 m - 0 . m e to � 0 m E , a� 0Uv) Aa 0 c - �ao 0 4 73 0 m = >, .° m > 0 0. 0 ,0 E w a m > E c m osc vLi I a2smol- � 0om0 „ c � m wo om -v •°'w W -' c m " `1) ;C. m c (� o m 12 ... co o u, a � .0c � « mai0 0 <a0 .c • m = mm> > maci3 . d � Nm "' 0. 0 N L ` u? c m c c 0 V c a V m = L. m_ V °° 0 ca U L. a' C• (n .c 'Fs �m - _ C Un w .. m m a ▪ c ,2 mot m 0 mE u, 0 -0 0) , 0c nw 3 0 N U • O N N L .� y C m 13 0 c c O y y ° w '3 0 L O W •. m ,- c.L c - 0 c E-1 >" ' �°oc Q.� o :? I D, ELr 00LOayemm o , y °� > 0m dd 3 N C H v! 0 w O .. C C ... t > t O C u) O 0 Q NC0 4- a) mcnmo F- E 0c. 3mc2ca ' >>c.2 a� ° Ec E m Z`s X43 ° t ° " L E o " m ca or '- m e W 0 CV `.' D o oc 0 a°i .5c c '� � 3 >, E mw R � 0 m caw 3 � s = E m -- •c V c 0v o w er c`aiamirn H > ._ No 'cE � 0mc ma.w0 ,° om ca o` ?? cfl.� E �c ; w0 C X c � m � c � CO cn � � ° = E 1° > � � � m• y` y c •c' 1... aG l'"•- VD 0 m w I•• 'G "Cu) - 4) w :E .0 ca C 0 O m R L 5 C C of N Q ca l4 3 o W N W .� O .0 C7 .mC +�•' L m cn •Utn•' c2 p O o L u! E O O 3 ca C N Id L CCI CIS E - o u) C ca %� I-- = I- w ca N b C E U - I- 0 O 1u) O E U) '0 N- I- d o_ ca ca V) N a. eN C m 0 4, C c� 0 0N C .0 O 0 -0 L1— OO — c\ v) CO v) en 411) F- >, m 0 o - Lm ''� c23>, - �' Z OZW' �Wa4 O3°'N a 4) c € N •Oc � aco C� 'L cn � � OZ �E8 mn C Q u, 13 II Q a � y Cj dy, •- oy - zzoo ° ° � ccy � wE t° 'ap2td ° � � cis 4cm 1_ O , • 3 y °? n a� -I ..0. -E .2.21:0rm 4) > C >t0T, dE' w w cOCOu) ° o U E C E m > as m v >. >. - 7 C co O C co 0 0)--5 a W O O 0 w L C J C R cu 5 TA Ill tx CE' . Q 'Q ,� 7 O A 2O 2co - 1 ONN 0 w co 0)1.. oz cis ra L ^t m Y 85 � 3c. ccmmOmf.1..) (-1 L.> o y0)tm = t° o >. a) o °' 'c o °-mV -) V c m o >. E me d wI- O I- L m CO V II ...Ndo o er - mL0 a) ' a� p. %...1 0 '°Ct = cm2 _cJQO 170 /20a ~ ON 1 — vw � m :II Da 9 ' ; 0 ° 3m L � o N y ' = aCOCoZ Cl. wti 2 2 - 2 > IIm c 8 v '- 0 c0O- v c X �" �" vm � CDL4) " c �oF- - r = m8coc > O� Nm mV > LO C U 4) C N OmC' m C yCyN .8... CON C + � Ccc0) m � ° w .OCO4) 0 cE c - ZA > m 3Lo � O .` � � nwU O U OUP0) °j O Rf O t4O E0m OcCw, c a 73 C . mm � 8 mC Cusce CLw OE � ° II m 4 a. u) cEO ao 3 .02 ° co T) ° c my 0 Ecmoci) tc .- Qm >� Cao fl.s LoCEm =j Om O O ,0o ,x - fl. m a � myom ox2O ` So3L ° 3 > - mm .2) mtoo .... _aL vsOLw L 0 > = 0, OpL0) F , 4vmLa 77 C m A C) acn Cm a0) cQ- m m m C oU .> v .Y a •p c m o � m o o 0L Cm � 0omc = mLCa m mcovw jC - � O . m 4) L 4) 12 21 •� Oo .17E > oo Vm 0) CL N �_ Nc .a 0 � CF- coO OsCLJ • m 0o- i m c C m � 0c m m cWim -•3 2OO � w > Eom > occ � � c _,Go.cn (0 °Z0cL- � m > xEEtoo o o o aaco J 5 Wmw Oo, N O 2 m(Dow _ 0 HR0Z EpoOCUV COww aEUm .- -odcC � corms! W 0 N 0 ccEc � CR - ° E >, m > C3 }, ch O m OL5COWQc aT 0ac cea '6. Em 0 .- 00Os0 Oo0FO .0dsbwE s:0 V4 0 et_ cv cus Cm QIIw � Lwcw. Qc--° m m v, 0) AE~ O as m15 m m 0 . a— c a ( co E .c ° m .c m mi0Q-.ZOocwL wH w m O a 9 O 0.E 4) O- m 1- 0 0 co O L •- - co L m C O m ° m O cu > vi > ■ m .0 as -a c.) coo ■ m ¢ .0 .- Q 0..g. L e F- 3 r- I- o a n = as c 'a 0 ww a; A a•' E-1 ¢ c4m w >• . C) ,� ... O •t m P. O m S - o 15 2 fli JA `' w3 -0° ) a' m oCOE C = c m cv V Z, ansCcy : )L4.,.. L m - ' m vs a = E > o m .� O -Q Ev u) E oII . ov) c 0mo0)L _ ' s NX0 °' mw `- o8TS mLa avim; cmoc � m tjm .�U3 m: 4 _ om0as 5. •, � Eali-' 0) o m W Z''' C IIm C m RLv •3 C ca co -cc m . zZ LCwCC OwII C � E Orm � m . � � V as O a3 C C N m N v - as Lm � . N • 2 a co :- o Om N II O Os a .- m Cr a m co ` N L .63. cm C C3L p) U -0 _cLy ° N 0 ,_ o- II _ - II 0) O -a 'm xA L 3 uJ•c c 5m mw mv040c Wc . > COm 'CO � . V N O4) '- ta3 E mp) 04 i C m V m = C VQ _O - L w t 0 O ' iiiw V >+ maO w w d m .;, CL ` es 13 6. CO. „ C ,= Q A ..a m � C N ul mym7 O mCC l�O... C . C > m mm - O E a oL V m x as n 'U >, O II = m Df m II 3 C m O w m C13 y L m L w 0 u) C EmiE lis' o 4 °0 73 1.. d2 0 C O CO A a U O y II C • - _ cu) 6 w O C C L '70 = u) my ) N .- w -. 3am � ° rts °cyCCOman °) LEU) � mCELY , ENm .-mQ� mo = .-3 � 400 RQ) a) aL .0 0 Is m u) V C O 1- ° w m mmw w. oc ° ` 0) v4Co3 > c'5N 0) a .UO -0 '- -0 a. � > OL 'm 'C m C UE� m `' = pv /] C C N C •. L' o mi � OC � a cN` 0m V ' > : N C ca N N . o 0 c E, 5" • j0 Ts Ed N -0p " O ` N ` vyc >5t •,C -, a) 7 o caC ° mmE ° a c.c aEao F aio 3c NQcn — L5 tuw R � ° ca 'a .. co 'c w L vm co -. c O LiIIII � O' #• ,� mCLma co m 0) m ui � � co N o C w cw o O vL a o m - c i C 3 � ,.., mc ° coC mmy3 ~ amm w° o mc� cnN- ° c ° oC . mm � cII " - c ;° E moO rnRNR2 „ 0 0071305c , Nc c C ti = 2mO m c .0 c = ULE acN '� m us� v . EE ° m 0N E as W Wom , � Lw L > mm >, O > .i' O OO 0C V wm L m • - OdC4) o L .L CO CO O L m N wm o ac) dr. us .EF- 2 .: UQ o C .0 c.) 0 0 m -a ■ I- O 0) u) v) (O ■ F- n O -a v) cv a ° > c ° a) am "o c• -4 Ch m a w? R E um t wa ul a C C - kr, O00E •> r C O C.-. - -a m m r R w - C a E .9'Ow ,� a) c0Z Za ,C >k C O) O O N aC o n ca C >. Q• Q u. N n m c= a ra= cErO -a vm y _ N zzW .CONwm � w > m W Om '� cCaU= � a Z. � .. r �- ti. �. ° . �c - wm mY ^« v_ av - cm v) v1 Jr- - cu 3 - 7 34I1i1I() c- CD v! E C V'a c6 - -0 m 'Q O oc > Z Na) Cn --- E , � mo cti 0 - as. � c0 0 0 000 o °r � w co •N yc •mp .t3mno U) . a) o > , 6� c ° Lc -n ' Ev r „ Qla s C0) m G vaN Nm ° ) ac " O c6 R� a > a D. �3N mm o U) 4 E Q 0 0 o m ). m E -c•• r a • wHuh OU)_ aa)Ca • 00Ow. Ec> OE c0c61_ aacom .o = ? m c -'• • >W . ) 1- n E •c ao = ° 73mwa ary m E '" r Aw nil 0-3 co te . Ea- Um • m � Na ° :vE0 >' ° � m zzUcamom -c v, -0 - ni ° E � :c «c0mII , o. -r0a � m ' 3mymm m mGw � E 51'(uw c- o -6L � � Wo c c c mas : 0 �Z mmm 3m O � oo CI) � C mms ) cps • � O m O ^-•N 4,1 ..e � Z a jU Let Q00a) t° C D1 ay� _ C O m c� o o13VyA9 y � mcoo pZ4ao � Wca Lla W �� C4m >, a) > Z aci m >, 0cn y = ao L . cw0c C w O `" W. cc � wU� a � � ayay co3 0 .� = � 0 � ) N `mecl ami 8 8 0 .z - 0) mg ." ,. .ci c)= cco E - C7OO > s E co c m � 3 ao'ia a o c "mm- m .c`°. � °'€ n `i' Z a 65 � � O' n: ° Z0 ° Iii W " � °, m3 y 0a) a4 two m ° �m = m _cc .0c4- acir`000Mm Iii o '- a0U ~ c m __ 42 O U O V a • ° y C 0 0 C 0. a ~ c Cco mca� yccc m m 0. C H Z ° o y �� c°fc mal � � �4 c c m m Q0) c W 1 OU .c' ° 1304... 4") CD ,_ O " 3 ,0J > a)W � 3m • 7 UoCry C cQ „ � N� ; � U m a) "c_ i p o v!v '.t a oOtoc my .- > r\ a� al " : ' m0 (7) ca 8 ) ° >� cCJyam0Od i Z ° oac >. ..- _ 0W wy y m m 3g � X ° ami � a c y •� = d 3 8ZZ 0 > 0. a Cl) }• o ° 3N m e° ° y N' 3 y m � 0) a a� > Op � E � o � cII ,� o � 3 yt ` ° '� O. co a>i -0 O Z ° •- ° c 8i c 3 ° 0 S m co .cal. c a..., -c-d W '� U a y 710 Z O m .- .off caZ Ca G C t �,.� co cwo a G w z ? � -� w Zd3 ,;' 3 c= m = o. 80 .". "- � m " c 3 .a E 0• E2 x nt Jin c hi o c") G O ,C U m Y r.. �1 ° 0 0 O t S a Z .� r.. C~ ..- Cl) mco a °) Q > aai cs y � = � 4D1= cocil a) AE- ri Zcr = 11.) N ? � k o o ac) m m°)� � m co E) o 0 > W ; N Y co N . 1-- /-. 0301-- 4.. 1-- 00' W00) 0004. 00 -... I 0.17 L C A. LA d to c WAco — 0 w 2 w 0 = 170 (4Em 0 1. o m v w Em amoco � CE :: rn 0 O_ � ... o o _ a) m c - a � c`. O .c 0-0 ;:, E E o c .4.1 a _a ,— Cat as X z •N c o NLS a� cc 0) &1 Z CO >+srn 300co 8E (7) a) ti C N a`) .._ ,.. C w >, >. .c E = cac .Q000 � n c -d.. a C.1 0E 3 "Cl O C C a j ° -0 c° 0WoacE � 2 � �a , 0a � � 4 >� 41 ac . . cc0000e ooma LL. O C )> Ca . > -0 .c j .- Hm F WaCr .y JD a) V va O y •' XI w Cco a C) a _ GApa ul O � •• 0 LI. .�oO - Lv) CR >v � 2= Nn € oc0. m � H O cco O aEw = 0 0. 0 � cC cEu 4' 00_ vO . o 4,) Wa2r. c ' .. oQ � Eo0 .a � O� ` Wc -= 3c'EeCcN c a) c > do • E4CC C •- - (1) 4- . C 0 .0 oO d Fpm- V = C W -0 I- 0) ca o O N cE No `n 13x c O = • c oa a) a) 6. t a) W 0 .• co j a) • ..... C > o !'6 O 0a 3X N co d t'70)777.. c "6014.07 .71 O C O L v) to "" O G4 Ea ,� Et O O C v) C a) 00. 000E p 0 o v! E d C '`. u) L4 N aN .- m — coa) 0m retaW rn W 0• O a) a) 'ma H > D_ CO = 3 a O C7 il) C eZ — C C a) a) .0 ::. a) ... ./2 -0 1- a) -. N Q a 0. N Q _ 3 .y 17 .0 0. 3 co N = 0 17 Cl) N a � wr � C o N N ° LA cV N m 'Q :.. O •j ii2fL0 yin '.., �1 00 CD t m ° m c m dZ04 Qe- R ° Lw ZZw n. 6 Lo "0C �• wow o - U U � �° E � r � 0 ,\ 000 1C m c• o � C70 �) II ,o N N CA „,,,.,8 c) c W D a. 1- , � y oma p w� � L ~ Cl. i co"HmC �«.. co ,,,a U 1,-- 01 c CDLLEaoa a. r' cw L= r) 3 2 E12 m � � C Ca) CO 41) Of U) - °� •c20m CU TA ms cTA y > � mm 28 ti H m LV > c � = .c \ A w 131 y w 0 L13 as O \ V .m te �Q 4- 0 m `V (Q 1t Z l > N 2 Q awE. E Zit • wJ i!1 um) UL) U LU o •0co� � ti Z°" ' A w N W 0 ° c o n •a Q�•E 0 o'- a) -C Z 113 0Eo - 0 Cti �Z' `l�l t .� V1 co — CuLa) l x Z Nc � Q �\ 0 � `o �� oc CY E-, Cil w ul _ a, 0 >' �IW co e' O m ;. a) 0 .-. W 1— N a) 0 O ca ticc, H 0 S .� -J E- 28 :50008 A m� QQ ¢ L •. a) ..F., S w W 3 W ccamwv � cU-...�CC� > w Sti! CO UU OELww O ca o 0 Aa w H w0 .c a 'wZZ -Q y a) vi �«- n cts m am ) 1 ca..0 -0 0 N co w_ m C O c O kE2 \C mC a t4N E3 L a. -0 o ao a)-0 \ > n. hL as ECU) J(0 0 c .Q m p_ a N (13 c wE ccs e,c cc w � Cu co m 0 C m Ldiw O a� .. °" o 71tnal c UtL I-0 W .0xCc Z � � w o = CO fn %. v) cQc a¢ Z H >3 < 2 7 J N4 c-,_ Q W mm Z N l4E wm IJJ 2 W ll N u 0 o0E .m � =,z. •=. •= w = w cn co ui 2 co p Om 0 °( t Q C f- Z s -c v CO w w LLl QQ m m aoC7 I- OCLmniaCom .- L CO 0 00 U) la v) CI O\ oo ON C41 74 CN '^ O o0 zzw a4 VaU „ O . 16 doa a U ~ O walU zA W C� O W j E O W H � wQ ZGOd a rM >Hw Z al w a. _In�,35 r d W � N a) °*vT3iEl cci.-2 .+ sl m Z v 0 '> Aw - L a � �- >, � d su' c`�l 0 ›;,-0 a0o � t a a A N O > ~ s S Q. D tQ :� a E 0 I-15 �f� c V CC L ta 9 9 cu ` �LL L� W a) co '`� U ° CtIIo °' O� O r �Q N w Ts; +' a 7 u) c a v >. 0 m 0 'C .� w d ° c �^Z '4 2 ` c N C7i �� o u Ac4 F co ° voi o >: 1E co 3rnQ e- Q a o � o U s Ya) .e o U Aa °- a U) _ oWIIo� N .� zzC 0 .. r a) g a0 co — — 2+ S d .colo • c z Uc ca w d »� w o 411-4 ca a) 3 a ° •• O a Cki o o c - , a U ¢ c a E Z 0 ro _ o ca o '� o.s O w E `o 0 w o rn w W a z < �' g ..UcQN c > H V cc �- c � � c O W 3 � w ami o f O 0Li. } caz c o a > �v � o. H E- a �_ H c4 r. L o o w 2 ill I— < Z w 'c ° 0 Q wNw ( N .. Q Q D o 0 a aoC7 a 0) 0 o CO w 0 > c w — a 0 Q �. (0 OU I-o CO 0 Z r e RESOLUTION NO. 5248 APPROVING 1997 TRANSFERS,DESIGNATIONS AND CARRYOVERS CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW County of Ramsey State of Minnesota WHEREAS,the City adopted budgets for various funds for 1997 which included interfund transfers for various purposes; and WHEREAS, the City has established various designation of fund equity; and WHEREAS,the City was unable to accomplish several items that were contemplated in the 1997 budget and did not have sufficient time to appropriate for such items in the 1998 budget. NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View that the following transfers for the calendar year 1997 are hereby approved: From To Amount Water Fund General Fund $ 64,500 Sewer Fund General Fund 38,690 Vehicle&Equip General Fund 64,000 Special Projects General Fund 90,000 General Fund Vehicle &Equipment 25,000 Water Fund Vehicle &Equipment 30,000 Sewer Fund Vehicle &Equipment 30,000 General Fund Community Center 12,302 Surface Water MSA 292,385 (1) Pedestrian Bridge MSA 111,341 (2) General Fund Recycling 159 (3) TIF Districts EDA 113,532 Pedestrian Bridge Street Lighting 25,000 (2) TIF Districts Community Ctr Const 1,213,089 (1) Share of Bronson Drive construction project. (2) Close out Pedestrian Bridge fund. Franchise Fee and General Fund funding transferred to MSA construction fund to assist in reducing its deficit. (3) To offset outlays in excess of recycling grant. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that$35,000 budgeted for contingencies be transferred to other departments as follows: $11,000 to City Council to cover costs associated with airport issues,$9,000 to Elections to cover the cost of two special elections, $6,000 to Community Development to cover costs associated with consultants and special meetings dealing with development projects, $2,000 for costs associated with fire inspection services, and $7,000 for Park Improvements paid from Parkland Dedication fees. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that for reporting purposes,the Waste Fund will provide$309,000 in reserves for the 1994 Golf Course Revenue Bonds for 1997 and 1998. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following General Fund designations are hereby approved: Cash Flows $1,486,982 Contingencies 550,396 Compensated Absences 345,741 Revenue shortfall 175,000 Parkland dedication 47,310 Community Center operations 37,698 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following 1997 carryover to 1998 are hereby approved: 1. General Fund - Finance Dept: Capital Outlays $21,000. Amount remaining from 1997 budget for purchasing a computerized accounting system plus refund on Tautges Redpath software purchased in 1996. Software was not fully purchased and installed in 1997 but will continue into 1998. 2. Surface Water Fund$2,900, Water Fund$1,000 and Wastewater Fund$3,000 for a total of $3,000. Funds unspent in 1997 for new portable radios, safety fencing and stakes and warning lights on equipment. Safety grant was anticipated being receiving in 1997 but was not received until 1998. Whereas said resolution was declared to have been duly passed and adopted this 22nd day of June, 1998. ATTEST: (SEAL) Item No. -74 Staff Report No. Meeting Date: 6/22/98 Type of Business: CB WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council Members From: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Authorization to Enter Into an Option to Purchase the Midland Videen Property and to Send Out a Request For Proposals. Date of Report: June 17, 1998 Background: The Midland Videen property is located south of the Community Center property and east of Edgewood Drive. The property is approximately 9.4 acres in size. A wetland occupies a major portion of the property. There is approximately 1 %2 acres at the southwest corner of the site that is developable. When Edgewood Drive is relocated,the City will have an additional 1 1/2 acre site which could be developed. Because the two sites would be contiguous it would make sense to market them together to get the best development. It also makes sense for the City to control what gets developed on the site to ensure that the development is compatible with the Community Center, City Hall, and the wetland. The City would have the most control over development if it controlled both sites. This would require that the City either acquire the Midland Videen site outright or acquire an option to purchase it. The City also needs to solve the parking problem at the Community Center. The best option for solving the problem is remove the wetland on the east side of the Community Center site and mitigate the loss by replacing it on the adjacent Midland Videen property. There is room to do the wetland replacement adjacent to the wetland on the Midland Videen property. The City could also develop trails and other passive recreational opportunities on Midland Videen property which could compliment the Community Center site and provide an amenity to attract development on the two 1 1/2 acre developable sites. The City previously considered purchasing the Midland Videen site for$330,000. The current asking price for the site is $250,000. The City could also take out a six month option on the property for $20,000. The option would give the City control over the site while a mitigation plan is finalized for the Community Center parking lot and while the developable sites are marketed to developers. Any required comprehensive plan, zoning, and subdivision issues could also be addressed during this time. An alternate course of action would be to not purchase or option the the Midland Videen property at this time. The City could ask for proposals which include both properties. The RFP could require that developers include in their submittal proof of control of the Midland Videen property and what they would sell the wetland to the city for. This alternative would limit the City of Mounds View Staff Report June 17, 1998 Page 2 number of developers who could submit a proposal because only one developer could demonstrate control of the Midland Videen property. A variation of this alternative would be to not require proof of control of the Midland Videen property. The City could select a developer based on the plan submitted, and the land bid for the City-owned parcel.The developer selected would then have to negotiate the purchase of the Midland Videen property and the City would have to negotiate with the developer to purchase the wetland outright or to purchase an easement to allow the city to do the mitigation necessary to solve the Community Center parking problem. Staff has drafted the attached Request For Proposals (RFP) which is based on the City acquiring an option on the Midland Videen property. If the Council chooses a different alternative the RFP would have to be amended. If authorized by the City Council, staff will send out the RFP to determine if there is developer interest in the two developable sites. The RFP will also help determine what kind of development could occur on the site and what developers would be willing to pay for the site in an open competitive process. If an acceptable proposal is received, the City could execute its option to purchase the Midland Videen site and sell the two sites to the selected developer. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council pass Resolution No. 5246 authorizing staff to enter into an option to purchase the Midland Videen property and to send out the request proposal to solicit developer interest in the developable portion of the Midland Videen property as well as the City- owned parcel created by the relocation of Edgewood Drive. r J.� Rick Jopke, Co unity Development Director N:\DATA\USERS\RICKJO\SHARE\062298.RPT CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL 1.0 REQUEST: The City of Mounds View is seeking proposals from qualified developers to acquire and develop a 3 acre site located at the intersection of Edgewood Drive and Highway 10. 2.0 GENERAL BACKGROUND: 2.1 Site The City of Mounds View will be realigning Edgewood Drive to provide a safer signalized intersection with Highway 10. This realignment will create a city-owned 1 1/2 acre development parcel. Existing unneeded public right-of-way would be vacated and made part of the development site. The City also has an option on an adjacent vacant 9.4 acre privately-owned parcel which could be acquired and developed in conjunction with the city-owned parcel. Due to a wetland, only approximately 1 1/2 acres of the privately-owned parcel adjacent to the city-owned site is developable. When these parcels are combined together the development site will be approximately 3 acres in size. 2.2 Development Objectives It is the city's goal to facilitate development of these two sites to enhance the city's tax base, provide a quality aesthetic physical environment which enhances the adjacent city hall/community center complex and protects and enhances the wetland. 2.3 Comprehensive Plan Designation The city's comprehensive plan currently designates the city-owned site as CC Civic Center. The privately-owned site is designated as MD Medium Density Residential and HC Highway Commercial. The City will consider redesignating the site for office/ commercial uses which are designed to meet the above-mentioned city development objectives. 2.4 Zoning The city-owned site is zoned PF Public Facilities and the privately-owned site is zoned B-3 Highway Business. The city will consider rezoning the site to a planned unit development(PUD)to provide design and use flexibility for an appropriate well designed project. 2.5 Adjacent Land Uses As can be seen from the attached map, surrounding land uses include the Mounds View City Hall to the west,the Mounds View Community Center to the north, an office/ 15 screen movie theater/restaurant project to the south, and the vacant privately-owned site to the east. There are is single family residential uses to the east of the privately-owned site. 2.6 Utilities City utilities including water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer are available to the site. On site ponding may be required. 2.7 Governmental Approvals Depending on the specific development proposal,required city approvals could include comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, PUD, subdivision, conditional use permit, and variance. Drainage plan approval from Rice Creek Watershed District would also be required. The City approval process takes 60 to 120 days, depending on the complexity of the project. The City is committed to working with the selected developer to expedite the the review and approval process where possible. 3.0 DEVELOPER SELECTION CRITERIA: The City Council will review proposals and make its selection based on the following criteria: 3.1 The project meets the city's development goals. 3.2 The developer has proven experience in developing the type of development proposed. 3.3 The quality of the proposed building and site planning. 3.4 Financial capability of the developer and/or development team. 3.5 Land bid on a per square foot basis (more is better). 3.6 Development schedule. 3.7 Proven ability in working with communities. The City Council has the right to reject any or all proposals at any time during or at the end of this process. The City Council also reserves the right to work with the selected developer to refine the proposal to best meet City goals and objectives. 4.0 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: In order to considered by the city,ten(10) copies of a submittal at an 8 1/2" by 11" size must be submitted. Folded 11" by 17" plans are also acceptable. Proposals must include the following: 4.1 Identification of the development team including architect, engineer, landscape architect, general contractor, equity partners, lenders, legal counsel, and others. The name, address, phone, and fax number of a contact person should be listed. 4.2 Development team experience and qualifications. 4.3 List of comperable projects 4.4 Finance plan description of the amount and type of security or performance bond offered, and projected market value of the project. 4.5 Land bid on a total and per square foot basis for the city-owned parcel. 4.6 Development schedule. 4.7 Concept plans including site plan, image sketches (perspectives,photos, elevation drawings, etc.), description of exterior materials and landscaping concept. 4.8 A deposit in the amount of$5,000. This deposit will be refunded to developers if they are not selected. The deposit will not be refunded to the developer selected and will be used to defray city costs for attorney fees, appraisals,platting etc. 5.0 SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: Proposals must be submitted to and received by the following no later than 4:30 p.m., Friday July 10, 1998: Rick Jopke Community Development Director City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 (612) 717-4021 (612) 784-3462 (Fax) attachments: site map, surrounding zoning, comprehensive plan, and landuse maps RESOLUTION NO. 5246 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING STAFF TO ENTER INTO AN OPTION AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE THE MIDLAND VIDEEN PROPERTY AND TO SEND OUT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO SOLICIT DEVELOPER INTEREST WHEREAS,the property described as follows commonly known as the Midland Videen property is for sale: Lot 6, Block 5 Pinewood Terrace No. 2 subject to easements and except the north 300 feet more or less lying west of the east 66 feet thereof, and Lots 17 and 18 Pinewood Terrace No. 2. WHEREAS, the above described property is contiguous to the Mounds View Community Center site; and WHEREAS, the above described property would provide an opportunity to replace and mitigate the loss of a wetland do to the need to expand the parking available on on the Community Center site; and, WHEREAS,the above described property would provide an opportunity to provide trails and passive recreational uses which would enhance the adjacent Mounds View Community Center and City Hall sites; and WHEREAS,the City of Mounds View proposes to realign Edgewood Drive to align with the proposed access to theater to create a signalized and safer intersection; and WHEREAS,the City of Mounds View will have a remnant parcel contiguous to the above described property after the realignment of Edgewood Drive; and WHEREAS,it is a goal of the City of Mounds View to facilitate development on the above described property and the City's remnant site to enhance the City's tax base and to provide a quality aesthetic physical environment which enhances the adjacent city hall/ community center complex and enhances the existing wetland on the above described site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council authorizes staff to obtain an option to purchase the above described property and to send out a Request for Proposals to facilitate well planned unified development of the above described property and the city-owned remnant parcel. Adopted this day of , 1998. Duane McCarty, Mayor ATTEST: Charles S. Whiting, City Clerk/Administrator NADATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\CITYCOUN\CCRESORD\MIDVIDOP.RES I Midland Videen / City Property Site Map ;......--3,-„,:41.f.! ', „.i 19 A_if a"..F,44-11.--..zigh\\ ,,i 1 giii �_1k�,�:,,,,,,��.?/t1i. I.'ag '"7.F� , am / i . d . Hllllll «�`tta u1i-+}ri�.e Iii ^^ y, `li �IIi•M _;_�Eg _ ielli 1 :.=stiwc E.: I s ; T VT �� . mm .RfmfeY ; _,. Vis:'is ��/!�!�p\_�� — - :� ISI:I`�'nln nnmunum Area /� n lint ;-f%'7'`.7 5 '1111fr. . im.r.nnnn of DetailjeW �+^ z-m"--47.--at, ------1,—1 iiI .: ,Er5i c. iN, riir.y.911 mine I" :: n 's=6."7 — III X31111331 1 ^� 6IIIltlllll II ICAC t ,...4„.„4 =:111Pr-__ ii _I L\ Egliii iiii 1 I�M -I5''�'Illii�c �11'L�,p t~i ,, N H H II i 1 ' II I 1; I 1 I i Bronson Drive i ii i i ( N. J City 1 1 -. Properties Shaded 1 Hall a`� i community 0 Available for Development N 17 I t Center I as Outlined in REP N r_________I 1 „ , NN N -, -,', ) _______, iI-'---__-i 1 1...... RemhTtt City j' 1 'Miami Vkieen ' � f Propert * ., I Properties t # I , N N. A.. .,,, fi N 47 go 41, /N, �r0 Theater Site .� v�y,® N ///,\ 7ya ,'Y / '1 1 1 I i i \ \ .1 ,c �i i �_i� ' Hi\> ,.../ (Ny________ ! County Road H2 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 -:N. �N, 1 *Area representing„Remnant City Property"is an approximation--not to scale. Item No. 714 Staff Report No. Meeting Date: June 22, 1998 • Type of Business: C.B. WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA: Consent Agenda; CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works Item Title/Subject: Update on Edgewood Drive Realignment and Signalization Date of Report: June 18, 1998 Representatives from SEH will be in attendance to present the proposed plans for the realignment of Edgewood Drive and the signalization of the intersection at TH 10. A schedule will also be presented for the completion of this project. A letter from SEH explaining any alternative designs for the realignment is attached to this report. Staff requests Council approval of the preliminary plans, and to proceed with the project. I believe this can be accomplished with a motion of the Council. If not, I will have a resolution prepared for consideration. Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works 06./19/98 07:59 FAX 612 490 2150 SEH ST. PAUL 0002/003 MEMORANDUM • ST. PAUL,MN ❑MINNEAPOLIS, MN ❑ST. CLOUD,MN ❑CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI 0 MADISON, WI 0 LAKE COUNTY, IN TO: Mike Ulrich, Public Works Director, City of Mounds View FROM: Glen Van Wormer, Manager, Transportation Engineering Group A DATE: June 19, 1998 RE: Mounds View, Minnesota Highway 10 and Edgewood Drive SEH No. A-MOUND9708.00 The relocation of the Edgewood Drive intersection on TH 10 is based on many factors. The existing intersection is at a very skewed angle, as are several others along TH 10. However,this intersection is also quite close to County Road 1-12. In order to prevent operational problems along TH 10, the relocated signalized intersection must be located at the approximate mid-point between the two existing signals on TH 10 at County Road H2 and at Long Lake Road. This location also best fits the connection to the city street proposed for the west side of TH 10 connecting to County Road H2 and providing access to the proposed development on the west side of TH 10. The proposed traffic signal for the new intersection is justified by traffic volumes from the expanded Community Center across from City Hall and from the development proposed on the west side of TH 10. Funding for the relocation is partially coming from the development on the west side. Mn/DOT has not agreed to fund any portion of the relocation of the intersection or the traffic signal, despite the improvements to TH 10_ To accommodate the location requirements of the intersection for traffic signals and for the development on the west side of TH 10, Edgewood Drive must be curved as it passes City Hall. It is desirable to provide a smooth 30 mph design speed curve. This design provides good traffic operations. Lesser design speeds have poor operations, including safety concerns of vehicles traveling over the centerline or hitting the curb. This has been demonstrated in instances where a low speed curve has been placed on an arterial street. This particular area also needs adequate sight distance along relocated Edgewood Drive to the entrances to the Community Center parking lot, relocated City Hall entrance and the entrance to the potential development in the area south of the relocated Edgewood Drive. Finally, in order to obtain Municipal State Aid funds for Edgewood Drive, a 30 mph design speed is necessary. The original concept provided a 30 mph design speed had significant impacts on the City Hall parking lot. To maintain the number of parking spaces currently provided, a concept of extending 06/19.98 08:00 FAX 612 490 2150 SEH ST. PAUL C j 003:003 Mike Ulrich June 19, 1998 Page 2 the parking lot to the west and reversing the parking aisles from a north-south alignment to an east- west alignment was proposed. This would impact existing trees and the berm on the west side of the parking lot. We revisited the design of the Edgewood Drive relocation. It can be slightly adjusted but the need for safe operation of the Edgewood Drive curve prevents any major reduction in the impact to the City Hall parking lot. Consideration instead should be given to not fully replacing all existing parking spaces. The existing capacity of the City Hall parking lot appears to be greater than the demand during the day except for rare occasions. The extra capacity is utilized when there is a City Council or Planning Commission meeting which draws a large crowd, or when there is a combination of ball games or other activities on the nearby fields at the same time as a Council or Planning Commission meeting. One option for overflow parking is to utilize the Community Center parking area on the east side of Edgewood Drive. A second option would be to construct a small parking lot between the water tower and the Public Works garage on the south side of Bronson Drive. Based on our review of the concerns, we believe it is still very desirable to provide the safety associated with the 30 mph design speed on Edgewood Drive. In the design stages,care can be taken to expand the parking lot in front of City Hall as much as possible without impacting the major growth of trees or making major changes in the berm which is in place. We can then determine the reduced number of spaces and see if they can be provided elsewhere on the City Hall campus,either at other locations around the building or by providing softball parking adjacent to the water tower. The other option is to look strictly at using overflow parking on the east side of Edgewood Drive in the Community Center parking lot. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to call Steve, Pam Maki or me. sah c: Rick Jopke, City of Mounds View • Steve Campbell, SEH Pam Maki, SEH F:l projects\mn\mound197081c1ulrich.Ci►9.wpd Item No. Staff Report No. Meeting Date: June 22, 1998 Type of Business: C.B. WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA: Consent Agenda; CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works Item Title/Subject: Discussion of Community Center HVAC Change Order Date of Report: June 19, 1998 Based on estimates of potential energy savings and a reduction of the initial purchase price, staff presented Council with a request to obtain a change order for the Community Center HVAC system. This process has reached a conclusion with less than the desired or anticipated results. The credits received from the contractor for the originally designed units is far less than acceptable. Although the final cost has not officially been presented to staff at the time of this writing,the change order would cost approximately $135, 000. This amount would represent a system that would provide the optimum in climate control and energy efficiency. At the beginning of this exercise it was anticipated that this system would cost approximately $100,000. To provide additional control for individual areas VAV (variable air volume)boxes could be installed for an approximate cost of$25,000. While this will improve the comfort of the building and especially the multipurpose room when it is divided, this system will not improve the efficiency of the system. Staff will have the final numbers to present to Council at the meeting. At this time it is imperative that a decision is made as to which variation of the change order will be chosen. Any further delay could jeopardize the opening of the building for Community Education's lease. Staff will seek a Council decision in this matter. If Council has any questions regarding this issue,please feel free to call me. K e,/&, V - Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works Item No. 317 Type of Business: CB WK:Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Cari Schmidt Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution 5245 Approving the Labor Agreement Contract with Public Works and Parks Maintenance Bargaining Unit Date of Report: June 17, 1998 As discussed at the June work session, the attached 1998 Labor Agreement with Public Works and Parks Maintenance Bargaining Unit reflects the following new provisions . • Annual compensation adjustment 3% • The City contributing up to $340 towards the cost of employee insurance • An adjustment to the reimbursement amounts for clothing and safety glasses allotment. This Agreement covers the time period of January 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 5245 approving the 1998 Labor Agreement contract with Public Works and Parks Maintenance Bargaining Unit RESOLUTION NO. 5245 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1998 LABOR AGREEMENT CONTRACT WITH PUBLIC WORKS AND PARKS MAINTENANCE BARGAINING UNIT WHEREAS, representatives from the Public Works and Parks Maintenance Bargaining Unit and City staff have met and discussed the 1998 Labor Agreement and have agreed to terms that include: • A 3% annual compensation adjustment; • The City contributing up to $340/mo. towards the cost of employee insurance; • An adjustment to the reimbursement amounts for clothing and safety glasses allotment; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the attached contract for the Public Works and Park Maintenance Labor Agreement contract for the period of January 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998, is hereby approved, effective January 1, 1998. Adopted this 22nd day of June, 1998 ATTEST: Mayor McCarty (SEAL) City-Clerk Administrator, Charles S. Whiting • LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW AND STEVEN D. DAZENSKI LAWRENCE DECHEINE WILLIAM G. HANGGI WILLIAM G. HANSON GARY G. KARDELL WALLACE RMORTENSON JEFFREY WIENKE TIMOTHY FREDBERG BRUCE MEEHAN MICHAEL SCHNUR JANUARY 1, 1998 -DECEMBER 31, 1998 1 ARTICLE 1. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT. 4 ARTICLE 2. CITY AUTHORITY 4 ARTICLE 3. APPLICABILITY OF CITY PERSONNEL CODE 4 ARTICLE 4. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 5 ARTICLE 5. DEFINITIONS 5 ARTICLE 6. SAVINGS CLAUSE 5 ARTICLE 7. WORK SCHEDULE 5 ARTICLE 8. OVERTIME PAY 6 ARTICLE 9. CALL BACK 6 ARTICLE 10. LEGAL DEFENSE 6 ARTICLE 11. RIGHT OF SUBCONTRACT 7 ARTICLE 12. DISCIPLINE 7 ARTICLE 13. SENIORITY. 7 ARTICLE 14. PROBATIONARY PERIODS 7 ARTICLE 15. SAFETY 7 ARTICLE 16. JOB POSTING. 8 ARTICLE 17. INSURANCE 8 ARTICLE 18. INJURY ON DUTY. 9 ARTICLE 19. CLOTHING 9 ARTICLE 20. STANDBY DUTY. 9 ARTICLE 21. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS 9 ARTICLE 22. JOB CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 10 2 ARTICLE 23. SEVERANCE 12 ARTICLE 24. WAGES 12 ARTICLE 25. INTERMITTENT LEAD WORKER 13 ARTICLE 26. DEPARTMENT LEAD DESIGNATION 13 ARTICLE 27. DURATION. 13 3 ARTICLE 1. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the City of Mounds View, hereinafter called the CITY, and the named members of the City's Public Works and Parks Department, hereinafter called the EMPLOYEES. The intent and purpose of this AGREEMENT is to: 1.1 Establish the conditions which will govern the employment relationship between the CITY and the EMPLOYEES in the Public Works Department including Garage, Parks Maintenance, Street Maintenance, Sanitary Sewer Operations, Water Operations and other maintenance areas the CITY may add; 1.2 Establish hours, wages and other conditions of employment; 1.3 Establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning this AGREEMENT's interpretation and/or application; 1.4 Specify the full and complete understanding of the parties; and 1.5 Place in written form the parties' agreement upon terms and conditions of employment for the duration of this AGREEMENT. The CITY and the EMPLOYEES, through this AGREEMENT, continue their dedication to the highest quality of public service. Both parties recognize this AGREEMENT as a pledge of this dedication. ARTICLE 2. CITY AUTHORITY. 2.1 The CITY retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all manpower, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to determine the utili7ittion of technology;to establish and modify the organizational structure; to select, direct and determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules; and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically addressed or limited by the AGREEMENT. 2.2 Any term and condition of employment not specifically established or modified by this AGREEMENT shall be governed by Chapter 300 of the Municipal Code, entitled Personnel, and shall remain solely within the discretion of the CITY to modify, establish, or eliminate. ARTICLE 3. APPLICABILITY OF CITY PERSONNEL CODE 3.1 Except where specifically superseded by this agreement, the Personnel Code, Chapter 300 of the Municipal Code, of the CITY shall regulate all conditions of employment. 4 ARTICLE 4. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 4.1 The grievance procedure for the EMPLOYEES shall be as prescribed by Section 308 of the Personnel Code. 4.2 Grievances relating to performance reviews shall be limited to Steps 1 and 2 of the established procedures. ARTICLE 5. DEFINITIONS 5.1 "EMPLOYEE" means an individual who has successfully completed the required probationary period and who employed on a schedule of at least 40 hours per week and 80 hours per pay period and who is subject to the terms of this agreement. 5.2 "BASE PAY RATE" means an employee's hourly pay rate exclusive of any other special allowances. 5.3 "SENIORITY" means length of continuous service with the CITY for purposes of promotion, transfer, layoff and recall. 5.4 "CALL BACK" means return of an employee to a specified work site to perform assigned duties at the express authorization of the CITY at a time other than an assigned shift. An extension of or an early report to an assigned shift is not a call back. ARTICLE 6. SAVINGS CLAUSE This AGREEMENT is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Miinnesota, and the CITY. In the event any provision of this AGREEMENT shall be held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgement or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provision shall be voided. All other provisions of this AGREEMENT shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provision may be renegotiated at the request of either party. ARTICLE 7. WORK SCHEDULE 7.1 The sole authority for work schedules is the CITY. The normal work day for an EMPLOYEE shall be eight(8)hours. The normal work week shall be forty(40)hours Monday through Friday. Hours per day and days of the week may be varied if mutually agreed between the CITY and the EMPLOYEE. 7.2 Service to the public may require the establishment of regular shifts for some EMPLOYEES on a daily, weekly, seasonal or annual basis other than the normal 7:00 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. day. The CITY will give seven(7) days advance notice to the EMPLOYEES affected by the establishment of work days different from the EMPLOYEES normal eight hour work day. 5 7.3 In the event that work is required because of unusual circumstances such as (but not limited to)fire, flood, snow, sleet, or breakdown of municipal equipment or facilities, no advance notice need be given. It is not required that an EMPLOYEE working other than the normal work day be scheduled to work more than eight (8) hours, however, each EMPLOYEE has an obligation to work overtime or call backs if requested unless unusual circumstances prevent the EMPLOYEE from so working. 7.4 Service to the public may require the establishment of regular work weeks that schedule work on Saturdays and/or Sundays. ARTICLE 8. OVERTIME PAY 8.1 Hours worked in excess of either eight(8) hours within a twenty-four(24)hour period (except for shift changes) or more than eighty(80)hours within a fourteen(14) day pay period will be compensated for at one and one-half times the EMPLOYEES regular base pay. Overtime worked on a holiday will be compensated at the EMPLOYEE's holiday pay plus two (2)times the regular pay rate. 8.2 Overtime will be distributed as equally as practicable based upon a list maintained by the CITY and in consideration of any special skill requirements. Work in progress will not be stopped merely to equalize overtime, but will continue with the crew assigned. 8.3 Overtime refused by EMPLOYEES will for record purposes under ARTICLE 8.2 be considered as unpaid overtime worked. 8.4 For the purpose of computing overtime compensation, overtime hours worked shall not be pyramided, compounded, or paid twice for the same hours worked. ARTICLE 9. CALL BACK An employee called in for work at a time other than the employee's normal scheduled shift will be compensated for a minimum of two(2)hour's pay at one and one-half(1 'h)the employee's base pay rate. ARTICLE 10. LEGAL DEFENSE 10.1 EMPLOYEES involved in litigation because of negligence, ignorance of the laws, non- observance of laws, or as a result of EMPLOYEE judgmental decision may not receive legal defense by the City. 10.2 An EMPLOYEE who is charged with a traffic violation, ordinance violation or criminal offense arising from acts performed within the scope of the EMPLOYEE's employment, when such act is performed in good faith and under direct order of the CITY shall be reimbursed for reasonable attorney's fees and court costs actually incurred by such EMPLOYEE in defending against such charge. 6 10.3 An EMPLOYEE classified as Level D in the Water area will be covered by the CITY's professional liability coverage and if, necessary, named separately in the policy. ARTICLE 11. RIGHT OF SUBCONTRACT Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall prohibit or restrict the right of the CITY from subcontracting work performed by EMPLOYEES covered by this AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 12. DISCIPLINE The EMPLOYER will discipline employees only for just cause. Suspension, demotion and dismissal actions shall be regulated by the Personnel Code. ARTICLE 13. SENIORITY. 13.1 Seniority will be the determining criterion for transfers, promotions and layoffs only when all job-relevant qualification factors are equal. 13.2 Seniority will be the determining criteria for recall when all job-relevant qualification factors are equal. Recall rights under this provision will continue for twenty-four(24) months after lay off. Recalled employees shall have ten(10)working days after notification of recall by registered mail at the employee's last known address to report to work or forfeit all recall rights. ARTICLE 14. PROBATIONARY PERIODS 14.1 All newly hired or rehired EMPLOYEES will serve a twelve(12)month probationary period. 14.2 Reclassified positions that have exhausted the twelve(12) month probationary period will serve a six(6) month probationary period. All EMPLOYEES will serve a six month(6) month probationary period in any job level in which the EMPLOYEE has not served a probationary period. 14.3 At any time during the probationary period a newly hired or rehired EMPLOYEE may be terminated at the sole discretion of the CITY. 14.4 At any time during the probationary period a promoted or reassigned EMPLOYEE may be demoted or reassigned to the EMPLOYEE's previous position at the sole discretion of the CITY. ARTICLE 15. SAFETY 15.1 The CITY AND THE EMPLOYEES agree to jointly promote safe and healthful working conditions, to cooperate in safety manners and to work in a safe manner. 7 15.2 The City will reimburse up to$75 per year, the cost of a City approved purchase of prescription safety glasses to be used during working hours, not to exceed $150 in a two (2)year period. ARTICLE 16. JOB POSTING. 16.1 The CITY agrees that permanent job vacancies within the department shall be filled based on the concept of promotion from within provided that applicants: 16.1.1 have the necessary qualifications to meet the standards of the job vacancy; and 16.1.2 have the ability to perform the duties and responsibilities of the job vacancy. 16.2 Employees filling a higher job level based on the provisions of this ARTICLE shall be subject to the conditions of ARTICLE 14 (PROBATIONARY PERIOD). 16.3 The EMPLOYER has the right of final decision in the selection of employees to fill posted jobs based on qualifications, abilities and experience. 16.4 Job vacancies within the designated bargaining unit will be posted for five(5)working days so that members of the bargaining unit can be considered for such vacancies. ARTICLE 17. INSURANCE 17.1 The CITY will contribute up to a maximum of three hundred forty dollars ($340)per month per employee for group health and life insurance for dependent coverage for calendar 1998. 17.2 By mutual agreement EMPLOYEES may use twenty-five dollars ($25.00) of the per month per employee of health insurance dollars for dental insurance. 17.3 EMPLOYEES not choosing dependent coverage cannot be covered at CITY expense for any additional insurance than the individual group health and group life insurance. Additional life insurance can be purchased by EMPLOYEES at the EMPLOYEE's expense to the extent allowed under the CITY's group policy. ARTICLE 18. INJURY ON DUTY. The Injury on duty benefit will be sixty(60) days with the first three (3) days to come out of sick leave and then sixty(60) days injury on duty. Any days beyond the sixty(60) days will then be taken from the EMPLOYEE's banked sick leave. EMPLOYEES receiving benefits under this ARTICLE shall not receive payments from the CITY which causes the EMPLOYEE to earn more than the EMPLOYEE's after tax take home pay earned while working. 8 ARTICLE 19. CLOTHING. 19.1 The CITY will contribute $60 every two (2)years for the purchase of one(1) winter jacket The winter jacket is to be cleaned and kept in repair by the employee. 19.2 The City will reimburse an employee up to $65 /year or up to a maximum of$195 in three (3) years toward the purchase of one pair of safety shoes of a type approved by the City (above the ankle boot with a steel/composite reinforced toe). Any remaining funds from the purchase of the boots can be"banked" for the three year period. ARTICLE 20. STANDBY DUTY. 20.1 EMPLOYEES assigned standby duty for a seven(7) day period shall be compensated at the rate of 7 hours of overtime. When a holiday falls within the seven(7) day period, an additional two hours at overtime rate shall be paid. Such standby pay shall be in addition to other compensation the EMPLOYEE is entitled to under this AGREEMENT including call back pay should the EMPLOYEE be required to return to the City to perform emergency work. 20.2 Standby duty will be made available to employees on a voluntary basis. Employees wishing to be assigned standby duty shall indicate their interest on a list maintained by the CITY. Employees wishing not to be assigned to standby duty shall not be included in the equalization of overtime under Article 8.2 and will be placed last on the callback list. 20.3 The EMPLOYEE on standby duty shall first be offered overtime for which he is qualified. If it is refused, it shall be offered to other employees in accordance with Article 8.2 of this AGREEMENT. 20.4 In further consideration of standby duty, the CITY shall furnish a vehicle for the EMPLOYEE to take home at his choosing during the period of standby duty. 20.5 A schedule of employees and their assigned standby duty assignment dates shall be maintained by the Public Works Supervisor. EMPLOYEES may, with the permission of the Public Works Supervisor, trade standby duty on a day-to-day basis with other public works/parks maintenance employees. ARTICLE 21. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS. 21.1 The CITY will design a performance review form with the input of the EMPLOYEES. 21.2 The CITY will perform a performance review on an annual basis to help guide the employee in areas which need to be more fully developed and to determine the job level to which the employee will be assigned for the next fiscal year. 21.3 Performance reviews will be prepared by each employees' supervisor. Appeals must follow normal City personnel rules. 9 ARTICLE 22. JOB CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM. 22.1 A 4 (four) level job classification system designated as Levels A, B, C and D will be used to classify employees and establish wages. 22.1.1 Public Services Worker-LEVEL A Requirements • High School Diploma GED, or equivalent. • Valid Minnesota Class C Driver's License. • Successful completion of City's physical examination. • Demonstrated ability to meet the physical demands of the job; including,but not limited to, lifting, bending, climbing, reaching overhead, pushing, and pulling with out restriction. • Demonstrated ability to read, understand, and follow written and oral instructions including safety rules. • Demonstrated ability to perform job responsibilities in climatic extremes. • Demonstrated ability to perform routine repair and maintenance tasks in the following sections: Streets, Parks, Building Maintenance, Sewer, Water, &Vehicle Maintenance • 22.1.2 Public Services Worker-LEVEL B Requirements • Meet or exceed all Level A requirements; and • Successful completion of one or more years of relevant experience. • Possession of valid Minnesota Commercial Driver's license plus endorsements required by the CITY. • For current Level A employees, the following areas must be satisfactory on the most recent performance review: (For new employees coming in at Level B these areas will be judged by their references in relevant work experiences) • Safe work practices and safe driving record. • Adherence to tardiness and sick leave policies. • Demonstrated ability to deal effectively and tactfully with the public. • Demonstrated ability to work with a minimum of on-site supervision. • Working knowledge of job fundamentals. • Adherence to all City policies and procedures. 22.1.3 Public Service Worker-LEVEL C Requirements • Meet or exceed all Level B requirements; and • Successful completion of 3 or more years of relevant experience. • For employees with primary responsibility in the indicated area, the following license/certificate will be required. • All areas- Successful completion of a certified heavy equipment training program or equivalent training and experience. • Water- Class D Water Supply System Operator's Certificate • Sewer- Class S D Waste Water Operator's Certificate 10 • Mechanic - Certification of successful completion of training in brakes, alignments, transmissions and driveline components, and vehicle electrical systems; and demonstrated proficiency in welding. • Streets - City certification in snow plowing, street patching, and demonstrated proficiency in both. • Parks-Basic proficiency in carpentry and plumbing demonstrated on the job to the satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation Director. • For current Level B employees, the following areas must be satisfactory on the most recent performance review: (For new employees coming in at Level C these areas will be judged by their references in relevant work experiences) • Working knowledge of all operations, preventive maintenance, and routine repairs of equipment operated or assigned to operate. • Working knowledge of methods and materials used in their areas of responsibility. • Demonstrated ability to work without direct on-site supervision and to make on- site decisions related to work assignments. 22.1.4 Public Service Worker-LEVEL D Requirements • Meet or exceed all requirements of Level C; and • Successful completion of 5 years of relevant work experience. • For employees with primary responsibility in the indicated area, or temporarily assigned to an area and in responsible charge, the following license/certificates will be required: • Water- Class B Water Supply System Operator's Certificate • Mechanic- Certification in computerized and electronic components, hydraulic systems, and completed training in propane fuel systems. • Parks -Minnesota Non-Commercial Herbicide/Pesticide Applicator License/Certificate and completion of liability training in parks operations(LMC Safety and Loss Control Workshop). Attendance at a workshop or seminar related to turf management and demonstration of a working knowledge of those principles. • Streets - Certification of completion of training in MMUTCD signing, attendance of work zone safety class, demonstrated ability to supervise contract labor and perform all designated tasks of accountability, ability to formulate preliminary division budget and maintain proper budgetary expenditures and completion of liability training for public works operations (LMC Safety and Loss Control Workshop) 11 • Sewer-Class S-C Waste Water Operator's Certificate. Demonstrated ability to effectively and efficiently operate jet truck for clearing sewers and cutting roots and inspection unit. Attendance of combined space and competent person seminar. Ability to formulate preliminary division budget and maintain budgetary expenditures. • Multiple Areas-Employees who meet the requirements for Level C classification in 3 or more areas; and must be normally assigned to these areas on a regular basis; irrespective of standby duty. Employees achieving Level D classification for skill in multiple areas must make substantial effort on an annual basis to receive the training and achieve required licensing for Level D in the area to which they are primarily assigned. • For Level C employees, the following areas must be satisfactory on the most recent performance review in order to be classified as Level D. • Demonstrated ability to lead a work crew. • Demonstrated ability to assist in scheduling other employees, materials, equipment and activities. • Demonstrated ability to assist in training of other employees. • Working knowledge of operations in all departments. • Demonstrated ability to assume supervisory duties in the absence of the Public Works Supervisor. • Demonstrated ability to respond to and resolve complaints effectively. ARTICLE 23. SEVERANCE 23.1 Severance pay shall be granted in the amount of fifty percent(50%) of the maximum accrual of one hundred and twenty(120) days of unused sick leave to employees who have completed ten years of service. Upon death of the employee, the beneficiary of the employee shall be paid the benefit. 23.2 Employees who have completed ten years of service and retire may elect, in lieu of severance pay as provided in Section 23.1, to have the employer use sixty five percent (65%) of the employee's accumulated and banked sick leave for the retiree's group insurance premium for as long as the funds are available up to the retiree's 65th birthday. ARTICLE 24. WAGES. 24.1 The following wage schedule will be in effect from the first payroll period in 1998 through the last payroll period in 1998. 1998 (3%) LEVEL A $12.25 9 per hour LEVEL B $14.38 $ 13.96 per hour LEVEL C $16.65 $ 16.17 per hour LEVEL D $17.00 $-1-6759 per hour 12 24.2 An EMPLOYEE classified in Levels B through D will receive wages listed for that level regardless of the area to which they are assigned, but will receive no less than the level to which they are classified. 24.3 New employees starting salary will be a percentage of the determined four level job classification system. Adjustments will occur throughou the first_year of employment resulting in 100% of the determined level upon completion ofihe employees probationary period. Starting salary resulting from job level reclassification will also be a percentage of the determined four level job classification system. Adjustments will occur throughout the probationary period, resulting in 100% of the determined level upon the end of the probationary period. Adjustments for new employees and job level reclassifications are not automatic. Adjustments are based upon performance and discretion of Public Works Director. ARTICLE 25. INTERMITTENT LEAD WORKER 25.1 Under certain circumstances, the Public Works Director as well as the Parks and Recreation Director may determine the need for an Intermittent Lead Worker to be in charge of a work crew. This determination will be made at the discretion of the Public Works Director as well as the Parks and Recreation Director and may be based on the complexity of a task, the number of workers involved, the experience level of the workers assigned, or a combination of these factors. The determination of the Public Works Director as well as the Parks and Recreation Director is final and not grievable. 25.2 The CITY will maintain a sign-up list for those EMPLOYEES who are to be considered for Intermittent Lead Worker assignments. Selections for Lead Workers will be made from this list in accordance with the Public Works Director's determinations of the best qualifications. There will be no attempt to egtuali7e distribution of Intermittent Lead Worker selections. 25.3 To be eligible on the sign-up list an employee must be classified as a Public Services Worker-Level D. Selections will be only for those areas in which the individual is classified. 25.4 The Lead Worker will receive a pay differential of$0.50 per hour while assigned as the Lead Worker. ARTICLE 26. DEPARTMENT LEAD DESIGNATION An employee who has been designated by the City to be Department Lead shall receive$1.00 per hour additional compensation. ARTICLE 27. DURATION. This AGREEMENT shall be effective as of January 1, 1998 and shall remain in full force and effect until December 31, 1998. 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT on this th day of , 1998. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW: Mayor Of: Ci Administrator EMPLO A S: 1 � . AILL._ /Steve D. Dazenski • Vai(44,64..rLawrence Decheine . , - • William G.Hanggi y1-n--./d William G. Hanson / Gary G. Kardell !!I ace R Mortenson %//•-ecji-cal) c4414vlichael Schnur `/' Jeffrey wienke i WA. 'imothy Fredberg i :nice Meehan MEMO To: Mayor, City Council From: Chief Ramacher Subject: Lion's Club Gift Date: June 16, 1998 Members of the Lion's Club will be at the June 22nd Council to present to the City a check for the purchase of two portable defibrillators. The defibrillators have been delivered and I will have them at the meeting. As you may know, the Lion's Club purchased two and Medtronic purchased two for a total of four defibrillators. These defibrillators will be in our marked squads as soon as our officers are trained in their use. INFORMATION O Ley IDEAS & SUGGESTIONS COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, June 10, 1998 Present: Kevin Carroll, Steve Dorgan,Mary Saarion and Chuck Whiting. Suggestions written for the Ideas& Suggestions Committee were reviewed by the Committee and action suggested. They are as follows: 1. Tracy Juell suggested that the City spotlight a department staff in the newsletter to reacquaint the community with employees especially since there are many new faces. Tracy Sanchez,the committee coordinator has already been brought this suggestion to the Editorial Board and they are planning to highlight the Community Development Department in the next edition of the City Newsletter and other departments on later editions. 2. Kitty Hickok requested a clock instead of a traditional plaque for her 10-year service award instead of a plaque. Committee thought that this would be appropriate if a clock was in comparable cost to the cost of a traditional plaque. Tracy Sanchez has a catalogue of plaques and clocks. 3. Steve Dorgan suggested that the City get a container for recycling plastic bottles especially now with the plastic bottle pop machine. Tracy Sanchez has already ordered a plastic bottle recycling container. 4. Tracy Sanchez suggested if the City could provide a little gift of some sort for all employees that attend the employee golf outing. While the time is short, Steve Dorgan will try to contact some places to see if he can find something appropriate for a give away for employees. Kevin Carroll mentioned that it would be nice to have Mounds View pins to wear or trade at city functions including the League of MN Cities affairs, etc. and he has sent for information on costs, etc. for city pins. Steve Dorgan will look into opportunities to purchase and sell City of Mounds View shirts, sweatshirts,hats, etc. 5. Kevin Carroll suggested that staff work to improve the appearance of City Hall by less clutter and mess. It was suggested that each and every employee take the time to discard stuff that isn't needed,to file information,to unclutter stuff that is sitting around and move items such as the dolly, cart and recycling trash container. It was suggested that each Department staff work on their own individual working areas and public access areas to keep City Hall looking neat and uncluttered. The Administration department will organize an office clean up day. 6. Kevin Carroll suggested that each department look into the possibilies of consolidating data, reports, documents, filing and resources etc. into a single area so that information and files are not so spread out. For instance, instead of having information on Hwy 10 redevelopment in three different departments and three different bookshelves, consolidate to one area. Likewise it was suggested that individual departments consolidate information so that everyone knows where to go to find something. Chuck mentioned that in Administration,Tracy and Cari were working on consolidating files and information and setting a city policy for filing and organizing files on microfilm and other media sources. 7. Steve Dorgan asked if the striping of City Hall parking lot was scheduled. Chuck Whiting replied that because of possible changes to the parking lot, striping may not be done anytime soon. Meeting adjourned. INFO ' ` AT I O N ONLY CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MONDAY, JUNE 22, 1998 AGENDA ROLL CALL: President McCarty, Vice President Koopmeiners, Commissioner Gunn, Commissioner Quick, Commissioner Stigney 1. AGENDA ADDITIONS 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES none 3. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS none 4. CONSENT AGENDA none 5. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. MVHRP -Proposal to Purchase 6991 Pleasant View Drive. 6. REPORTS none 7. ADJOURNMENT Item No. Meeting Date: 6-22-98 Staff Report No. Type of Business: EDAB WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;EDAB:EDA Business Mounds View Economic Development Authority Staff Re ort To: Mounds View Economic Development Authority From: Steve Dorgan, Housing Inspector Item Title/Subject: MVHRP - Proposal to Purchase 6991 Pleasant View Dr. Date of Report: June 19, 1998 SUMMARY At the EDA meeting on April 13, 1998,the commission approved the appraisal and negotiation for purchase of 6991 Pleasant View Drive for participation in the Housing Replacement Program. Staff arranged for and received an appraisal for the subject property which resulted in an appraised value of $56,000. In negotiation with the Joe Witzman, owner of the property, he indicated that Ramsey County assessed the value of his property at$60,500. Mr. Witzman wished to sell his property at a minimum of the taxed value on the property. Attached is a resolution appropriating$60,500 of tax increment funds for the purchase of the subject property for the Housing Replacement Program. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED Approve EDA Resolution No. 98-EDA-93 authorizing the purchase of property located at 6991 Pleasant View Drive for the Housing Replacement Program. Steve Dorgan Housing Inspector 717-4023 Attachments: Exhibit A: Resolution No. 98-EDA-93 N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\HOUSING\MVHRP\6991PLEA\JUNE 22.98 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 98-EDA-93 MOUNDS VIEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF 6991 PLEASANT VIEW DRIVE AS PART OF THE EDA'S HOUSING REPLACEMENT PROGRAM It is hereby resolved by the Board of Commissioners(the"Board")of the Mounds View Economic Development Authority(the"Authority")as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.10 The Authority has the powers provided in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134 and 469.090 to 469.108 (collectively,the"Act"). 1.02 Pursuant to and in furtherance of the objectives of the Act,the Authority has undertaken a program to promote development and redevelopment of certain land within the City of Mounds View and in this connection is engaged in carrying out the Mounds View Economic Development Project(the"Project")within the City. 1.03 There has been approve pursuant to the Act a Project Plan for the Project. 1.04 The Housing Replacement Program has been adopted under and as part of the Project Plan. 1.05 The redevelopment of property within the Project is a stated objective of the Project Plan and the Housing Replacement Program. 1.06 In order to achieve the objectives of the Project Plan,the Authority has determined to provide substantial aid and assistance through the financing of certain public costs of development. 1.07 The stated purposes of the Housing Replacement Program include reducing the social costs of blight,making better use of public infrastructure, and redistributing tax base to communities with higher levels of fiscal needs. The Housing Replacement Program's objectives include replacing smaller, lower-value housing on scattered sites throughout the City with larger,new and higher-value housing designed for families,the elimination of blighting influences and substandard housing, and the increase of available quality housing for families within the City. 1.08 It has been proposed that the Authority acquire the property located in the City at 6991 Pleasant View Drive(the"Property")and that the Authority enter into a purchase agreement and/or similar agreement(s)(collectively,the"Agreement")for that acquisition and/or subsequent clearance of the property for redevelopment. Section 2. Resolved. 2.01 The Board hereby determines that the Authority's execution of the Agreement and the subsequent acquisition and/or clearance of the Property would be in furtherance of the Project Plan and the Housing Replacement Program and hereby approves and authorizes said actions, including the execution of the Agreement by the officers of the Authority in their discretion and at such time, if any, as they may deem appropriate. RESOLUTION NO. 98-EDA-93 PAGE TWO OF TWO 2.02 Upon execution and delivery of the Agreement,the officers and employees of the Authority(including members of the City Staff, acting in their capacity as staff to the Authority as well)are hereby authorized and directed to take or cause to be taken such actions as may be appropriate or necessary on behalf of the Authority to implement the Agreement, including the acquisition of the Property,which is being accomplished for redevelopment purposes. 2.03 That the Board of the Authority hereby determines that the execution and performance of the Agreement and aquisition of the Property will help realize the public purposes of the Act and are in furtherance of the Project Plan and the Housing Replacement Program and authorizes the President and Executive Director to appropriate$60,500 in tax increment funds to purchase the property located at 6991 Pleasant View Drive. Adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Mounds View Economic Development Authority this 22th day of June, 1998. Duane McCarty,President ATTEST: Chuck Whiting,Executive Director N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDE V\HOUSING\PLANB OOK\PLANB OOK.RES