Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1998/05/26 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNCIL AGENDA TUESDAY,MAY 26, 1998 7:00 PM 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL: McCarty, Stigney, Koopmeiners, Quick, Gunn 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. May 11, 1998 City Council Meeting Minutes 4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: A. Resolution No. 5235, Resolution of Appreciation for Firefighter Eric R. Emerson 5. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Just and Correct Claims. B. Approval of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes-April 15, 1998 and Park and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes -February 26, 1998. C. Approval of License Application for Festival Committee Beer Garden. D. Set a Public Hearing for 7:05 PM, June 8, 1998 for Resolution No. 5241, a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a Residential Dog Kennel at 2359 Pinewood Circle, for Scott and Marcia Dumonceaux. 6. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR A. Citizens: Before speaking must give their full name and address for the minutes. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. 7:05 PM Public Hearing and Introduction of Ordinance No. 617, and Ordinance Amending Title 1100, Chapters 1114 and 1115 of the Municipal Zoning Code Relating to Permitted Uses within the B-3, Business Commercial, and B-4, Regional Business Zoning Districts. 1. First Reading Roll Call: Gunn, Quick,Stigney,Koopmeiners, McCarty B. Report on Tree Damage. C. Consideration of Resolution No. 5240, Determination of Sufficiency of Petition Concerning Anthony Properties Management Project. Page 2 City Council Agenda May 27, 1998 D. Approval of New Drywall Bid for Community Center. E. Consideration of Resolution No. 5239, 1999 Budget Calendar. F. Review of Council/Staff Retreat. CLOSED SESSION G. Status of Golf Course Law Suit. 8. REPORTS 9. Next Council Work Session: June 1, 1998 -6:00 PM Next Council Meeting: June 8, 1998 -7:00 PM 10. ADJOURNMENT MEMO May 22, 1998 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator Re: May 26, 1996 City Council Meeting It has been another busy week. Here's the agenda for Tuesday's meeting: Consent Agenda: Item 5D-License Application for Festival Committee Beer Garden: The Council may want to note this item as a follow up to the other discussions allowing this part of the event to take place. Cane has been in close contact with Sharie Linke and has reviewed all the security and grounds layout to make this part of the Festival go as smoothly as possible. Council Business: Item 7B-Report on Tree Damage: As of today, Friday, the trees and branches from last Friday's storm are finally getting cleared and may continue to do so over the weekend. Rick Wriskey has been through the community several times and has organized pickup on behalf of the City. Contractors have been working the Shoreview area and are slowly getting freed up to move about the other areas hit. Pockets of damage in Mounds View include the south Greenfield Avenue area, some spots around the Quincy and Bronson area,upper Knollwood, and some random trees. Rick has noted the apparent storm related trees and will be monitoring for appropriate debris removal and excluding general yard type work. He will be present to address the Council Tuesday and respond to any concerns. As for the City doing the pickup, the policy is to allow the city administrator with notification to the mayor to determine whether the storm damage warrants city involvement in cleaning predominantly residential debris. Saturday and Monday I went around parts of town and felt the amount of debris and the spread out nature of it would require the city to step in and provide clean up. I talked with Rick Wriskey Monday and his assessment was the same. He is familiar with our policy since it is essentially the same as New Brighton's. I called the mayor on Saturday and again Monday and gave the go ahead to Rick. I should know more about the cost next week. Item C - Resolution 5240 re: Sufficiency of Petition: Council has my letter and a letter from the city attorney regarding the petition submitted to the city on the access points for Long Lake Road and/or County H2. On Monday I had our two top election judges review the petition's signatures against the voter registration list. By the end of Tuesday, they had determined 733 signatures were valid. The charter requires 15% of the voters in the last presidential election to have signed. 5,724 voters voted, meaning 859 signatures were needed. By this requirement, the petition is not sufficient. The charter does allow for additional signatures to be submitted, and I have notified the petition group with the same letter that is in your packet. The attorney's letter addresses the language of the petition and in his determination, that too is insufficient. He can review this with the Council on Tuesday. I have also forwarded this letter to the petitioning group. The charter requires the Council to respond to this petition by resolution. The petition included in your packet follows the determination of myself as clerk and the city attorney. However, if the Council does wish to go with the petition question, some discussion should take place with the city attorney first. Item D - Approval of New Drywall Bid for Community Center: I individually briefed Council members over the past week about the circumstances that led to the removal of a contractor on the community center site. Last Thursday I was informed that a problem existed at the site because a contractor was not paying prevailing wages. In working with the city attorney, it was determined that the best course of action was to negotiate to cancel the agreement with the contractor and proceed to the second bidder. The general contractor negotiated a settlement with the contractor Tuesday. The contractor was paid his expenses to date of$6,121 and $20,000 as a settlement. The general contractor then went to the second bidder and a new contract was arrived at. The cost of the new contract is essentially the same amount that was left on the first contract. I expect to have some cost summaries of how this relates to the budget expenses we have expected. Two concerns about this situation are being addressed. First, it was understood that prevailing wages were to be required of the contractors in this project, yet the language was not in either the specifications or the contracts. I am asking the city attorney, the general contractor (Flannery Construction)and the architect (WAI)to review their understanding of this requirement and how it came to be left out of the project's requirements. I do not anticipate to have all that together by Tuesday. Second, the state grant in this project does require the prevailing wages, and we are trying to determine how this effects that. Obviously this was not part of the plan for this project and as I figure out how this came to be I will report back to the full Council. In the mean time, the project is proceeding on schedule. Item E-Resolution 5239, 1999 Budget Calendar: It is that time of year again. The city typically adopts a resolution scheduling budget meetings for the rest of the year. We can review this Tuesday for your schedules. Item F-Review of Council/Staff Retreat: Carie has put together a summary of the discussion from last Monday night's retreat. I appreciate the discussion that took place and different points of view that contribute to the city's work. I was thinking of giving a short summary for the community's benefit and perhaps some follow up dialogue with Council members. Item G- Status of Golf Course Lawsuit: We again need to review the status of the suit at the golf course. This will have to be done in a closed session once again. That's it for now. Have a good weekend. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the claim numbers: 10308 through 10396 in the amount of $ 176.281.37 57651 through 57657 in the amount of $ 8.552.23 10248 through 10307 in the amount of$ 410.632.30 TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 595,465.90 and has found said claims to be just and correct; It was moved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached list of claims dated 05/26/98 by the vote ayes nayes Mayor Clerk-Administrator { • Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:06 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 1 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Ranges: Journal #: (A) Transaction #: (A) Check Date: (R) 05131998 - 05261998 Check#: (A) Bank#: (A) Jptions: # of copies: 1 Void Checks: N Page on Check: N Check # Vendor Name Check Date Type Jrnl# Trans Account # Title Description Amount Invoice Check 10248 Commonwealth Land Title Ins. C 05/18/1998 R 77 4 470-4650-3030 Other professional services BelRae Community Center 21,606.95 470-4650-7050 Construction BelRae Community Center 244,539.00 470-4650-3030 Other professional services BelRae Community Center 125.00 Invoice Total: 266,270.95 266,270.95 10249 Harriet Alexander Nature Cente 05/18/1998 R 77 3 100-4100-3630 Training & conferences building rental 53.00 Invoice Total: 53.00 53.00 10250 Hickok, Kitty 05/18/1998 R 77 2 100-4150-3630 Training & conferences reimburse expenses 117.92 700-4820-3630 Training & conferences reimburse expenses 117.93 730-4820-3630 Training & conferences reimburse expenses 117.92 Invoice Total: 353.77 353.77 10251 Bruce Kessel 05/18/1998 R 77 1 100-4160-1140 Miscellaneous office supplie reimburse expenses 74.43 100-4160-3800 Milage reimbursement reimburse expenses 24.00 100-4150-3630 Training & conferences reimburse expenses 5.15 100-4150-3630 Training & conferences reimburse expenses 235.39 210-4350-1600 Operating supplies reimburse expenses 5.95 Invoice Total: 344.92 344.92 10252 M. Reinert Drywall, Inc. 05/19/1998 R 88 1 470-4650-7050 Construction Payoff contract per agreement 26,121.00 Invoice Manual Total: 26,121.00 26,121.00 10296 University of Nebraska 05/20/1998 R 110 1 100-4180-3630 Training & conferences R Jarson - dealing with upset p 78.00 Invoice Manual Total: 78.00 78.00 10300 Western Bank 05/21/1998 R 113 1 100-4180-0150 Salaries, part-time regular 5/21/98 Payroll 595.00 100-4100-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 2,267.31 100-4130-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 3,260.14 100-4130-3800 Milage reimbursement 5/21/98 Payroll 138.46 100-4140-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 194.72 100-4150-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 4,526.49 100-4160-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 2,040.13 100-4160-0150 Salaries, part-time regular 5/21/98 Payroll 363.71 100-4180-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 10,711.22 100-4200-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 31,768.74 100-4200-0110 Salaries, overtime 5/21/98 Payroll 193.68 100-4200-0150 Salaries, part-time regular 5/21/98 Payroll 486.80 , Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:07 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 2 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Check # Vendor Name Check Date Type Jrnl# Trans Account # Title Description Amount Invoice Check 100-4350-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 1,218.88 100-4150-0110 Salaries, overtime 5/21/98 Payroll 93.04 100-4350-0150 Salaries, part-time regular 5/21/98 Payroll 640.00 100-4360-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 3,900.49 100-4360-0110 Salaries, overtime 5/21/98 Payroll 150.00 100-4360-0150 Salaries, part-time regular 5/21/98 Payroll 520.00 100-4367-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 136.00 100-4380-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 68.43 100-4350-0110 Salaries, overtime 5/21/98 Payroll 66.00 100-4460-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 165.12 100-4462-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 990.72 100-4465-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 495.36 100-4470-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 1,950.70 100-4470-0110 Salaries, overtime 5/21/98 Payroll 24.99 100-4472-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 533.12 100-4472-0110 Salaries, overtime 5/21/98 Payroll 24.99 100-4475-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 1,082.56 100-4475-0110 Salaries, overtime 5/21/98 Payroll 24.99 100-4700-0750 Fitness programs 5/21/98 Payroll 77.02 210-4350-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 68.42 210-4350-0150 Salaries, part-time regular 5/21/98 Payroll 591.79 230-4650-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 992.31 240-4416-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 32.80 245-4417-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 516.80 245-4417-0110 Salaries, overtime 5/21/98 Payroll 96.90 250-4351-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 268.24 250-4351-0150 Salaries, part-time regular 5/21/98 Payroll 390.00 250-4352-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 268.24 250-4352-0150 Salaries, part-time regular 5/21/98 Payroll 30.00 250-4353-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 336.66 250-4354-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 268.24 250-4354-0150 Salaries, part-time regular 5/21/98 Payroll 481.50 700-4820-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 330.80 700-4820-0110 Salaries, overtime 5/21/98 Payroll 248.10 700-4823-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 3,940.78 700-4823-0110 Salaries, overtime 5/21/98 Payroll 225.68 700-4825-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 680.00 700-4825-0110 Salaries, overtime 5/21/98 Payroll 799.68 730-4820-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 330.80 730-4820-0110 Salaries, overtime 5/21/98 Payroll 248.10 730-4823-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 4,098.09 730-4823-0110 Salaries, overtime 5/21/98 Payroll 145.62 730-4823-0150 Salaries, part-time regular 5/21/98 Payroll 468.00 730-4826-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 1,381.96 730-4826-0110 Salaries, overtime 5/21/98 Payroll 48.45 750-4900-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 3,158.50 750-4900-0150 Salaries, part-time regular 5/21/98 Payroll 2,442.38 750-4901-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 1,609.20 750-4901-0150 Salaries, part-time regular 5/21/98 Payroll 2,127.71 750-4902-0100 Salaries, regular 5/21/98 Payroll 1,165.50 750-4902-0150 Salaries, part-time regular 5/21/98 Payroll 551.39 Invoice 052198 Total: 97,051.45 97,051.45 • Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:09 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 3 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Check # Vendor Name Check Date Type Jrnl# Trans Account # Title Description Amount Invoice Check 10301 ICMA Retirement Trust - 457 05/21/1998 R 116 4 100-4130-0321 PERA coordinated - employer ICMA for 052198 Whiting 115.68 230-4650-0321 PERA coordinated - employer ICMA for 052198 Whiting 38.56 Invoice 052198 Total: 154.24 154.24 10302 Minnesota Department of Health 05/21/1998 R 116 5 700-4823-3630 Training & conferences Water Operators Conference 45.00 Invoice 052198 Total: 45.00 45.00 10304 Public Employees Insurance Pro 05/21/1998 R 116 1 100-4130-0400 Health insuranace - employer June Health Insurance 230.35 100-4160-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 177.06 100-4360-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 847.06 100-4472-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 121.76 100-4150-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 642.33 100-4180-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 1,619.13 100-4200-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 5,312.17 100-4350-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 202.26 100-4465-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 98.13 100-4462-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 206.26 100-4460-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 32.71 100-4475-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 60.92 100-4367-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 32.72 100-4380-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 10.12 100-4470-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 235.48 210-4350-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 166.35 230-4650-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 68.49 240-4416-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 16.86 245-4417-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 65.42 245-4417-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 65.42 250-4354-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 59.00 250-4352-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 59.00 250-4351-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 59.00 250-4353-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 69.12 700-4823-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 902.12 700-4825-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 153.80 700-4820-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 84.43 730-4826-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 574.49 730-4823-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 796.02 730-4820-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 84.43 750-4900-0400 Health insurance - employer June Health Insurance 645.55 Invoice June Ins Total: 13,697.96 13,697.96 10306 Public Employees Retirement As 05/21/1998 R 116 2 100-4100-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 39.76 100-4130-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 53.20 100-4140-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 10.09 100-4150-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 239.29 100-4160-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 119.39 100-4180-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 585.66 100-4200-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 133.24 100-4350-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 99.71 100-4472-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 28.91 • Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:11 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 4 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Check # Vendor Name Check Date Type Jrnl# Trans Account # Title Description Amount Invoice Check 100-4470-0321 PERA coordinated -employer PERA for 05/21/98 102.34 100-4465-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 25.66 100-4200-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 3,406.04 100-4460-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 8.55 100-4360-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 209.30 100-4367-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 7.04 100-4380-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 3.55 100-4462-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 51.32 100-4475-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 57.37 210-4350-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 30.49 230-4650-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 12.84 240-4416-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 1.70 245-4417-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 31.79 250-4352-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 13.90 250-4351-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 13.90 250-4353-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 17.44 250-4354-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 13.90 700-4823-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 215.82 700-4825-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 76.65 700-4820-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 29.99 730-4820-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 29.98 730-4823-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 219.84 730-4826-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 74.09 750-4900-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 263.99 750-4902-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 60.37 750-4901-0321 PERA coordinated - employer PERA for 05/21/98 118.65 Invoice 052198 Total: 6,405.76 6,405.76 10307 Public Employees Retirement As 05/21/1998 R 116 3 100-4100-0321 PERA coordinated - employer May Defined Contribtions 56.25 Invoice Defined Total: 56.25 56.25 10308 Debbie Benson 05/26/1998 R 109 117 250-3400 Recreation revenue Class Refund 20.00 Invoice 98586 Total: 20.00 20.00 10309 Cheryl Bornhorst 05/26/1998 R 109 118 250-3400 Recreation revenue Class Refund 20.00 Invoice 98587 Total: 20.00 20.00 10310 Jodi Tomkins 05/26/1998 R 109 119 250-3400 Recreation revenue Class Refund 15.00 Invoice 98588 Total: 15.00 250-3400 Recreation revenue Class Refund 20.00 Invoice 98589 Total: 20.00 35.00 10311 Mary Malrick 05/26/1998 R 109 121 250-3400 Recreation revenue Class Refund 37.00 Invoice 98590 Total: 37.00 37.00 10312 Patrick Quinn 05/26/1998 R 109 2 250-4353-1600 Operating supplies Music in the Park 200.00 Invoice 98559 Total: 200.00 200.00 Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:12 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 5 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Check # Vendor Name Check Date Type Jrnl# Trans Account # Title Description Amount Invoice Check 10313 Kim Smith 05/26/1998 R 109 122 250-3400 Recreation revenue Class Refund 30.00 Invoice 98591 Total: 30.00 30.00 10314 Gretchen Davis 05/26/1998 R 109 123 250-3400 Recreation revenue Class Refund 30.00 Invoice 98592 Total: 30.00 30.00 10315 Robert Kraemer 05/26/1998 R 109 143 700-2325 Deposit - water meter Meter Refund 90.00 Invoice 98602 Total: 90.00 90.00 10316 Marilyn Wandke 05/26/1998 R 109 124 250-3400 Recreation revenue Overpayment for Picnic Shelter 5.00 Invoice 98593 Total: 5.00 5.00 10317 Marian Meyer 05/26/1998 R 109 125 250-3400 Recreation revenue Class Refund 32.00 Invoice 98594 Total: 32.00 32.00 10318 Gerald Kluthe 05/26/1998 R 109 126 250-3400 Recreation revenue Class Refund 34.00 Invoice 98595 Total: 34.00 34.00 10319 Shelly Bruce 05/26/1998 R 109 127 250-3400 Recreation revenue Class Refund 17.00 Invoice 98596 Total: 17.00 17.00 10320 Janice Carter 05/26/1998 R 109 128 250-3400 Recreation revenue Class Refund 20.00 Invoice 98597 Total: 20.00 20.00 10321 Jan Truchan 05/26/1998 R 109 129 250-3400 Recreation revenue Class Refund 20.00 Invoice 98598 Total: 20.00 20.00 10322 Loretta, Birkholz 05/26/1998 R 109 130 250-3400 Recreation revenue Class Refund 20.00 Invoice 98599 Total: 20.00 20.00 10323 Lia Heuring 05/26/1998 R 109 135 750-3800 Golf course revenue Golf Refund 92.00 750-3800 Golf course revenue Golf Refund 8.00 Invoice 98560 Total: 100.00 100.00 10324 Emily Nyman 05/26/1998 R 109 136 750-3800 Golf course revenue Golf Refund 100.00 Invoice 98601 Total: 100.00 100.00 10325 Sue Ihde 05/26/1998 R 109 116 250-3400 Recreation revenue 15.00 15.00 Invoice 98585 Total: 15.00 15.00 , Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:13 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 6 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Check # Vendor Name Check Date Type Jrnl# Trans Account # Title Description Amount Invoice Check 10326 A T & T Wireless 05/26/1998 R 109 115 100-4200-3100 Telephone Service Charge 7.56 Invoice 4941832 Total: 7.56 7.56 10327 Advantage "1" Services 05/26/1998 R 109 3 250-4351-1600 Operating supplies 4 Pages-Youth Activities 125.00 Invoice 980007 Total: 125.00 125.00 10328 Affordable Sanitation 05/26/1998 R 109 133 750-4900-4030 Satellites Portable Toilet Units 143.80 Invoice 9801201 Total: 143.80 143.80 10329 Ancom Communications, Inc. 05/26/1998 R 109 5 100-4200-7030 Equipment Spectra VHF High Power 2,407.00 Invoice 18202 Total: 2,407.00 225-4200-1600 Operating supplies 4 Portable Radios 3,427.40 Invoice 18302 Total: 3,427.40 5,834.40 10330 Barton Sand & Gravel Co. 05/26/1998 R 109 11 100-4360-1600 Operating supplies 6.61 Tons Washed Sand 28.51 Invoice 69330 Total: 28.51 100-4360-1210 Supplies, buildings & ground 19.42 Washed Sand 175.39 Invoice 71342 Total: 175.39 203.90 10331 Batteries Plus 05/26/1998 R 109 10 750-4900-1220 Supplies, vehicles Overpayment -27.69 Invoice Total: -27.69 100-4360-1600 Operating supplies Battery 26.61 Invoice D38620 Total: 26.61 730-4823-1230 Supplies, equipment Lanterns, Batteries 26.39 Invoice D40512 Total: 26.39 730-4823-1230 Supplies, equipment Battery 58.56 Invoice D41744 Total: 58.56 750-4900-1220 Supplies, vehicles Batteries 94.77 Invoice D44130 Total: 94.77 178.64 10332 Beisswengers 05/26/1998 R 109 14 100-4360-1210 Supplies, buildings & ground Cable, Wire Rope Thimble, Clip 17.17 Invoice 550747 Total: 17.17 100-4360-1210 Supplies, buildings & ground 4 Pole Connector 7.98 Invoice 554362 Total: 7.98 100-4360-1210 Supplies, buildings & ground Screws 6.26 Invoice 560482 Total: 6.26 750-4900-1600 Operating supplies Nozzle, Syringe, Screws 23.32 Invoice 568132 Total: 23.32 750-4900-1600 Operating supplies Ultraflector, Screws 12.56 Invoice 568889 Total: 12.56 67.29 10333 Best Buy 05/26/1998 R 109 17 100-4160-5130 Repairs, equipment Modem, Surge Suppressors, Mouse 57.14 Invoice 0110114427 Total: 57.14 57.14 Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:14 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 7 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Check # Vendor Name Check Date Type Jrnl# Trans Account # Title Description Amount Invoice Check 10334 Bette & Court 05/26/1998 R 109 18 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Golf Merchandise 1,303.91 Invoice 33361 Total: 1,303.91 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Golf Merchandise 64.91 Invoice 33942 Total: 64.91 1,368.82 10335 City of Blaine - 05/26/1998 R 109 20 750-4901-3200 Water & sewer 8290 Coral Sea St. 20.76 Invoice 98561 Total: 20.76 750-4901-3200 Water & sewer 2850 82nd Lane N.E. 20.76 Invoice 98562 Total: 20.76 41.52 10336 Bob's Personal Coffee Service 05/26/1998 R 109 22 100-4160-1140 Miscellaneous office supplie Coffee 93.97 Invoice 13710 Total: 93.97 93.97 10337 Capitol Beverage Sales 05/26/1998 R 109 24 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Beverages 97.95 Invoice 63133 Total: 97.95 97.95 10338 Cellular Sales & Service, Inc. 05/26/1998 R 109 25 220-4200-1600 Operating supplies Recond. Cell Phones 793.42 Invoice MVPD423A Total: 793.42 793.42 10339 Coffee Inn of Minnesota, Inc. 05/26/1998 R 109 26 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Beverages 99.90 Invoice 46102 Total: 99.90 99.90 10340 Copy Sales 05/26/1998 R 109 23 100-4200-1600 Operating supplies Copier Developer 37.22 Invoice 122403 Total: 37.22 37.22 10341 Cottens, Inc. 05/26/1998 R 109 140 100-4465-1220 Supplies, vehicles Drain Plugs 4.79 Invoice 272174 Total: 4.79 100-4465-1220 Supplies, vehicles Drain Plugs returned -.62 Invoice 272201 Total: -.62 4.17 10342 David-Geoffrey & Associates 05/26/1998 R 109 28 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Golf Merchandise 150.00 Invoice 0793083 Total: 150.00 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Golf Merchandise 51.89 Invoice 0797359 Total: 51.89 201.89 10343 Jeff Ellis & Assoc., Inc. 05/26/1998 R 109 29 250-4354-1600 Operating supplies Aquatic Safety Operational Audi 175.00 255-4350-1600 Operating supplies Aquatic Safety Operational Audi 175.00 Invoice 981096 Total: 350.00 350.00 10344 Erickson's Newmarket 05/26/1998 R 109 146 250-4351-1600 Operating supplies Groceries, Paper Plates, Cups 17.50 Invoice 8263 Total: 17.50 17.50 • Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:15 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 8 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Check # Vendor Name Check Date Type Jrnl# Trans Account # Title Description Amount Invoice Check 10345 Goodhue County National Bank 05/26/1998 R 109 30 100-4160-4010 Rental, equipment Lease Payment 244.84 Invoice 59258 Total: 244.84 244.84 10346 W. W. Grainger 05/26/1998 R 109 31 750-4900-1230 Supplies, equipment Flashlite,Batteries,Socket Adap 24.55 Invoice 497-169662-2 Total: 24.55 24.55 10347 Griggs, Cooper & Company 05/26/1998 R 109 32 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Beverages 102.25 Invoice 06851 Total: 102.25 102.25 10348 David Hix 05/26/1998 R 109 33 100-4180-3030 Other professional services Record,Transc.Planning Mtg.5/6/ 56.25 Invoice 78 Total: 56.25 56.25 10349 Hornungs Pro Golf Sales, Inc. 05/26/1998 R 109 137 750-3800 Golf course revenue Golf Merchandise 280.68 Invoice 989792 Total: 280.68 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Golf Merchandise 28.06 Invoice 990716 Total: 28.06 750-3800 Golf course revenue Golf Merchandise 68.35 Invoice 992120 Total: 68.35 377.09 10350 Hughes & Costello 05/26/1998 R 109 34 225-4200-1600 Operating supplies Prihoda Forfeiture 341.00 Invoice 98563 Total: 341.00 100-4200-3020 Prosecuting attorney service Legal Services 3,500.00 Invoice 98564 Total: 3,500.00 3,841.00 10351 Independent School Dist. #621 05/26/1998 R 109 131 100-2020 Accounts Payable Building Supervision for 9/97 - 4,788.00 Invoice 98565 Total: 4,788.00 4,788.00 10352 Insty Prints 05/26/1998 R 109 36 250-4351-1600 Operating supplies Printing-Wellness, Youth Classe 170.08 Invoice 16432 Total: 170.08 170.08 10353 Izzo Systems, Inc. 05/26/1998 R 109 37 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Golf Merchandise 190.62 Invoice 62401 Total: 190.62 190.62 10354 Adolph Kiefer 05/26/1998 R 109 38 250-4354-1600 Operating supplies Portable Resuscitator, Starter 560.54 255-4350-1600 Operating supplies Portable Resuscitator, Starter 452.60 Invoice 00178900 Total: 1,013.14 1,013.14 10355 Krass Monroe, P.A. 05/26/1998 R 109 39 230-4650-3030 Other professional services Silverview Estates legal matter 1,741.30 invoice 9806-00001-007 Total: 1,741.30 1,741.30 10356 Lesco, Inc. 05/26/1998 R 109 40 100-4360-1210 Supplies, buildings & ground 40# L&O Micro 97.98 Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:16 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 9 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Check # Vendor Name Check Date Type Jrnl# Trans Account # Title Description Amount Invoice Check Invoice 9XI2E0 Total: 97.98 97.98 10357 Lucent Technologies 05/26/1998 R 109 41 100-4160-3100 Telephone Equipment Lease 50.48 Invoice 5250311131 Total: 50.48 50.48 10358 M.A.U.M.A. 05/26/1998 R 109 42 100-4130-3610 Memberships Membership Dues 30.00 Invoice 98566 Total: 30.00 30.00 10359 Medtox Laboratories 05/26/1998 R 109 145 100-4160-3030 Other professional services Drug Testing 60.00 Invoice 0008100L Total: 60.00 60.00 10360 Metro Council Environmental Se 05/26/1998 R 109 132 730-4823-3230 Waste water disposal Water Treatment 62,025.66 Invoice 51320698 Total: 62,025.66 62,025.66 10361 Minnegasco 05/26/1998 R 109 134 750-4901-3220 Natural gas Natural Gas 12.90 Invoice 98600 Total: 12.90 12.90 10362 Minnesota Conway 05/26/1998 R 109 43 100-4200-1600 Operating supplies Fire Extinguisher, Recharging 137.11 Invoice 5M3504 2959 Total: 137.11 100-4160-5110 Repairs, buildings & grounds Fire Extinguisher, Chemicals 59.58 Invoice 5M3504 2961 Total: 59.58 196.69 10363 Minnesota Housing Finance Agen 05/26/1998 R 109 44 100-4180-3630 Training & conferences Conference - Dorgan 500.00 Invoice 95867 Total: 500.00 500.00 10364 Minnesota Recreation & Park Fo 05/26/1998 R 109 46 250-4351-1600 Operating supplies Leadership Workshop 20.00 Invoice 95868 Total: 20.00 100-4350-3610 Memberships Membership Dues 150.00 Invoice P55 Total: 150.00 170.00 10365 Mita Financial Services 05/26/1998 R 109 48 100-4200-4010 Rental, equipment Copier Payment 102.99 Invoice 21421432 Total: 102.99 102.99 10366 National Golf Foundation 05/26/1998 R 109 142 750-3800 Golf course revenue Easy Way Golf Rules 147.75 Invoice 16681 Total: 147.75 147.75 10367 National Independent Billing 05/26/1998 R 109 49 100-4150-5130 Repairs, equipment Hardware Maintenance 27.00 700-4820-5130 Repairs, equipment Hardware Maintenance 13.50 730-4820-5130 Repairs, equipment Hardware Maintenance 13.50 Invoice 95869 Total: 54.00 54.00 10368 New Brighton, City of 05/26/1998 R 109 50 • Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:16 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 10 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Check # Vendor Name Check Date Type Jrnl# Trans Account # Title Description Amount Invoice Check 100-2020 Accounts Payable Forestry services 2,453.50 Invoice 98570 Total: 2,453.50 2,453.50 10369 Nike, Inc. 05/26/1998 R 109 53 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Golf Merchandise 2,532.91 Invoice 28157138 Total: 2,532.91 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds 75049011210 388.58 Invoice 28157139 Total: 388.58 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Golf Merchandise 64.65 Invoice 28821705 Total: 64.65 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Golf Merchandise 67.15 Invoice 28944106 Total: 67.15 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Overpayment -20.42 Invoice 0A58874 Total: -20.42 3,032.87 10370 Greg Norman Collection 05/26/1998 R 109 56 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Golf Merchandise 656.38 Invoice 00310447 Total: 656.38 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Golf Merchandise 506.43 Invoice 00325247 Total: 506.43 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Golf Merchandise 131.33 Invoice 00326455 Total: 131.33 1,294.14 10371 North Star Turf, Inc. 05/26/1998 R 109 59 750-4900-1600 Operating supplies Belt-Jac, Blazon Blue, Tee Towe 353.28 Invoice 168456 Total: 353.28 353.28 10372 Northern States Power 05/26/1998 R 109 63 255-4350-3210 Electricity 1699 E. 79th - Beach House 6.52 Invoice 027169127 Total: 6.52 100-4360-3210 Electricity 2710 Co. Rd. I 39.52 Invoice 053512119 Total: 39.52 750-4901-3210 Electricity 8290 Coral Sea - Clubhouse 329.81 Invoice 346795124 Total: 329.81 750-4901-3210 Electricity 8290 Coral Sea St. 3.92 Invoice 347877124 Total: 3.92 100-4200-3210 Electricity 1755 Co. Rd. I W. 6.44 Invoice 349293124 Total: 6.44 750-4901-3210 Electricity 8290 Coral Sea-Maint. & Clubhou 126.13 Invoice 349486124 Total: 126.13 750-4901-3210 Electricity 8290 Coral Sea St. 344.97 Invoice 612811124 Total: 344.97 750-4901-3210 Electricity 8290 Coral Sea - Pump 584.57 Invoice 941195124 Total: 584.57 700-4823-3220 Natural gas 7545 Groveland Well #6 22.70 Invoice 948390119 Total: 22.70 1,464.58 10373 Pepsi-Cola Company 05/26/1998 R 109 60 750-4900-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Beverages 234.40 Invoice 55774183 Total: 234.40 234.40 10374 Phillips 66 Company 05/26/1998 R 109 114 100-4200-1700 Motor fuels & lubricants Gasoline 561.65 Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:17 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 11 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Check # Vendor Name Check Date Type Jrnl# Trans Account # Title Description Amount Invoice Check 100-4360-1700 Motor fuels & lubricants Gasoline 29.82 100-4462-1700 Motor fuel & lubricants Gasoline 122.65 730-4826-1700 Motor fuels & lubricants Gasoline 32.68 Invoice 8054111794 Total: 746.80 746.80 10375 Pro Sign 05/26/1998 R 109 62 100-4200-7040 Vehicles Vehicle Graphics 583.40 Invoice 1460 Total: 583.40 583.40 10376 Pugsley's Sandwiches, Inc. 05/26/1998 R 109 61 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Sandwiches 38.04 Invoice 237059 Total: 38.04 38.04 10377 Ramsey County 05/26/1998 R 109 74 100-4200-3050 Dispatching - contractual 1st Qtr.Radio Service Chgs. 16,472.60 Invoice D01651 42100 Total: 16,472.60 280-4160-3030 Other professional services Spec. Assessment Chgs. 427.50 Invoice K03026 40504 Total: 427.50 16,900.10 10378 St. Croix Recreation Co., Inc. 05/26/1998 R 109 75 100-4360-1210 Supplies, buildings & ground Cartridges, Strainer Bolts 223.16 Invoice 10735 Total: 223.16 223.16 10379 Scantron 05/26/1998 R 109 76 100-4150-5130 Repairs, equipment Quarterly Billing- Maintenance 57.82 700-4820-5130 Repairs, equipment Quarterly Billing- Maintenance 43.36 730-4820-5130 Repairs, equipment Quarterly Billing- Maintenance 43.36 Invoice 10103866 Total: 144.54 144.54 10380 Schwaab, Inc. 05/26/1998 R 109 72 100-4180-1600 Operating supplies Rubber Stamp 28.23 Invoice L212123 Total: 28.23 750-4901-1600 Operating supplies Rubber Stamp 26.21 Invoice L918814 Total: 26.21 54.44 10381 Short-Elliott & Hendrickson 05/26/1998 R 109 78 470-4650-3030 Other professional services Bel Rae wetland delineation 593.79 Invoice 46893 Total: 593.79 593.79 10382 Snyders 05/26/1998 R 109 79 100-4200-1600 Operating supplies Film Processing 16.59 Invoice 98571 Total: 16.59 16.59 10383 Spalding 05/26/1998 R 109 80 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Tour Graphite -300.00 Invoice 50851432 Total: -300.00 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Golf Merchandise 704.00 Invoice 51098512 Total: 704.00 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Golf Merchandise 221.95 Invoice 51166506 Total: 221.95 625.95 10384 Spring Lake Park Fire Departme 05/26/1998 R 109 83 100-4210-3030 Other professional services Fire Inspection Services 492.50 Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:18 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 12 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal heck # Vendor Name Check Date Type Jrnl# Trans Account # Title Description Amount Invoice Check Invoice 98572 Total: 492.50 100-4210-3032 Contractual fire services Fire Protection Service - 10/98 12,182.00 Invoice 98573 Total: 12,182.00 12,674.50 10385 Steichens Sporting Goods 05/26/1998 R 109 84 250-4351-1600 Operating supplies Baseball Equipment 205.94 250-4352-1600 Operating supplies Baseball Equipment 178.45 Invoice 010202 Total: 384.39 250-4351-1600 Operating supplies Baseball Equipment 69.98 250-4352-1600 Operating supplies Baseball Equipment 45.00 Invoice 010213 Total: 114.98 499.37 10386 Sysco Food Services of Minneso 05/26/1998 R 109 87 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Chips 15.19 Invoice 1228371 Total: 15.19 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Meat 44.29 Invoice 805020063 Total: 44.29 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Beverages, Candy, Chips 220.78 Invoice 805060955 Total: 220.78 280.26 10387 T.W.C. of America 05/26/1998 R 109 89 250-4351-1600 Operating supplies Restocking Charge 128.67 Invoice 98000156 Total: 128.67 128.67 10388 U. S. Games 05/26/1998 R 109 113 250-4351-1600 Operating supplies Baseball Equipment 111.25 Invoice U825599 Total: 111.25 111.25 10389 Uniforms Unlimited 05/26/1998 R 109 91 100-4200-2400 Uniform & clothing Credit Memo -35.51 Invoice 399041 Total: -35.51 100-4200-2400 Uniform & clothing Uniform Equipment 89.57 Invoice 419444 Total: 89.57 54.06 10390 U. S. West 05/26/1998 R 109 92 100-4360-3100 Telephone Park Security Phone 126.09 Invoice 98574 Total: 126.09 100-4360-3100 Telephone 785-0950 56.03 Invoice 98575 Total: 56.03 100-4160-3100 Telephone 784-4349 80.02 Invoice 98576 Total: 80.02 750-4900-3100 Telephone 784-9871 55.63 Invoice 98577 Total: 55.63 100-4160-3100 Telephone 784-3055 1,191.48 Invoice 98578 Total: 1,191.48 1,509.25 10391 U. S. West Communications 05/26/1998 R 109 97 100-4360-3100 Telephone 780-1908 22.46 Invoice 98579 Total: 22.46 100-4360-3100 Telephone 784-1305 20.87 Invoice 98580 Total: 20.87 100-4360-3100 Telephone 784-1076 20.87 Invoice 98581 Total: 20.87 64.20 Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:19 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 13 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Check # Vendor Name Check Date Type Jrnl# Trans Account # Title Description Amount Invoice Check 10392 Unitog Rental Services 05/26/1998 R 109 99 750-4900-2400 Uniform & clothing Uniform Rental 75.29 Invoice 740139053 Total: 75.29 75.29 10393 Viking Safety Products 05/26/1998 R 109 103 750-4900-2400 Uniform & clothing Airweave Jacket, Pants 56.60 Invoice B25837 Total: 56.60 750-4900-2400 Uniform & clothing CPR Microshield 13.42 Invoice B26091 Total: 13.42 250-4351-1600 Operating supplies Bandages, Bactine 82.06 Invoice B26535 Total: 82.06 152.08 10394 W.A.I. Continuum 05/26/1998 R 109 109 470-4650-3030 Other professional services Overpayment -4,122.50 Invoice Total: -4,122.50 470-4650-3030 Other professional services Community Center 6,157.70 Invoice 4949 Total: 6,157.70 470-4650-3030 Other professional services Mounds View Interiors 2,750.00 Invoice 4950 Total: 2,750.00 4,785.20 10395 H. T. Wakefield 05/26/1998 R 109 105 750-4900-3030 Other professional services Maintenance on equipment 491.00 Invoice 482-1 Total: 491.00 491.00 10396 Western Bank 05/26/1998 R 109 110 290-4420-3960 Awards Savings Bond - Kalar 50.00 Invoice 98582 Total: 50.00 290-4420-3960 Awards Savings Bond - Lea 50.00 Invoice 98583 Total: 50.00 290-4420-3960 Awards Savings Bond - Wresh 50.00 Invoice 98584 Total: 50.00 150.00 57654 Minnesota Shopping Center Assn 05/13/1998 M 128 96 100-4180-3630 Training & conferences Hotel Development Seminar 30.00 Invoice 98605 Total: 30.00 30.00 57655 Brennan, Timothy 05/15/1998 M 128 28 220-3680 Miscellaneous revenue Reimbursement for Dare Party 215.94 Invoice 98604 Total: 215.94 215.94 57656 Durow, Scott 05/18/1998 M 128 40 100-4200-5130 Repairs, equipment Replacement of Window 236.29 Invoice 98603 Total: 236.29 236.29 57657 Blimpie Subs & Salads 05/18/1998 M 128 25 100-4100-3630 Training & conferences Council/Staff Retreat 57.03 Invoice 98603 Total: 57.03 57.03 547,452.93* Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:20 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 14 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Account # Description Debit Credit Recap Totals: 100-1010 Cash - Pooled 132,315.80 100-2020 Accounts Payable 7,241.50 100-4100-0100 Salaries, regular 2,267.31 100-4100-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 96.01 100-4100-3630 Training & conferences 110.03 100-4130-0100 Salaries, regular 3,260.14 100-4130-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 168.88 100-4130-0400 Health insuranace - employer contrib 230.35 100-4130-3610 Memberships 30.00 100-4130-3800 Milage reimbursement 138.46 100-4140-0100 Salaries, regular 194.72 100-4140-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 10.09 100-4150-0100 Salaries, regular 4,526.49 100-4150-0110 Salaries, overtime 93.04 100-4150-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 239.29 100-4150-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 642.33 100-4150-3630 Training & conferences 358.46 100-4150-5130 Repairs, equipment 84.82 100-4160-0100 Salaries, regular 2,040.13 100-4160-0150 Salaries, part-time regular pay 363.71 100-4160-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 119.39 100-4160-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 177.06 100-4160-1140 Miscellaneous office supplies 168.40 100-4160-3030 Other professional services 60.00 100-4160-3100 Telephone 1,321.98 100-4160-3800 Milage reimbursement 24.00 100-4160-4010 Rental, equipment 244.84 100-4160-5110 Repairs, buildings & grounds 59.58 100-4160-5130 Repairs, equipment 57.14 100-4180-0100 Salaries, regular 10,711.22 100-4180-0150 Salaries, part-time regular pay 595.00 100-4180-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 585.66 100-4180-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 1,619.13 100-4180-1600 Operating supplies 28.23 100-4180-3030 Other professional services 56.25 100-4180-3630 Training & conferences 608.00 100-4200-0100 Salaries, regular 31,768.74 100-4200-0110 Salaries, overtime 193.68 100-4200-0150 Salaries, part-time regular pay 486.80 100-4200-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 3,539.28 100-4200-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 5,312.17 100-4200-1600 Operating supplies 190.92 100-4200-1700 Motor fuels & lubricants 561.65 100-4200-2400 Uniform & clothing 54.06 100-4200-3020 Prosecuting attorney services 3,500.00 100-4200-3050 Dispatching - contractual 16,472.60 100-4200-3100 Telephone 7.56 100-4200-3210 Electricity 6.44 100-4200-4010 Rental, equipment 102.99 100-4200-5130 Repairs, equipment 236.29 100-4200-7030 Equipment 2,407.00 100-4200-7040 Vehicles 583.40 100-4210-3030 Other professional services 492.50 100-4210-3032 Contractual fire services 12,182.00 100-4350-0100 Salaries, regular 1,218.88 Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:20 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 15 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Account # Description Debit Credit 100-4350-0110 Salaries, overtime 66.00 100-4350-0150 Salaries, part-time regular pay 640.00 100-4350-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 99.71 100-4350-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 202.26 100-4350-3610 Memberships 150.00 100-4360-0100 Salaries, regular 3,900.49 100-4360-0110 Salaries, overtime 150.00 100-4360-0150 Salaries, part-time regular pay 520.00 100-4360-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 209.30 100-4360-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 847.06 100-4360-1210 Supplies, buildings & grounds 527.94 100-4360-1600 Operating supplies 55.12 100-4360-1700 Motor fuels & lubricants 29.82 100-4360-3100 Telephone 246.32 100-4360-3210 Electricity 39.52 100-4367-0100 Salaries, regular 136.00 100-4367-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 7.04 100-4367-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 32.72 100-4380-0100 Salaries, regular 68.43 100-4380-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 3.55 100-4380-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 10.12 100-4460-0100 Salaries, regular 165.12 100-4460-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 8.55 100-4460-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 32.71 100-4462-0100 Salaries, regular 990.72 100-4462-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 51.32 100-4462-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 206.26 100-4462-1700 Motor fuel & lubricants 122.65 100-4465-0100 Salaries, regular 495.36 100-4465-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 25.66 100-4465-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 98.13 100-4465-1220 Supplies, vehicles 4.17 100-4470-0100 Salaries, regular 1,950.70 100-4470-0110 Salaries, overtime 24.99 100-4470-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 102.34 100-4470-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 235.48 100-4472-0100 Salaries, regular 533.12 100-4472-0110 Salaries, overtime 24.99 100-4472-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 28.91 100-4472-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 121.76 100-4475-0100 Salaries, regular 1,082.56 100-4475-0110 Salaries, overtime 24.99 100-4475-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 57.37 100-4475-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 60.92 100-4700-0750 Fitness programs 77.02 Totals: 132,315.80* 132,315.80* 210-1010 Cash - Pooled 863.00 210-4350-0100 Salaries, regular 68.42 210-4350-0150 Salaries, part-time regular pay 591.79 210-4350-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 30.49 210-4350-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 166.35 210-4350-1600 Operating supplies 5.95 Totals: 863.00* 863.00~ Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:20 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 16 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Account # Description Debit Credit 220-1010 Cash - Pooled 1,009.36 220-3680 Miscellaneous revenue 215.94 220-4200-1600 Operating supplies 793.42 Totals: 1,009.36* 1,009.36* 225-1010 Cash - Pooled 3,768.40 225-4200-1600 Operating supplies 3,768.40 Totals: 3,768.40* 3,768.40* 230-1010 Cash - Pooled 2,853.50 230-4650-0100 Salaries, regular 992.31 230-4650-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 51.40 230-4650-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 68.49 230-4650-3030 Other professional services 1,741.30 Totals: 2,853.50* 2,853.50* 240-1010 Cash - Pooled 51.36 240-4416-0100 Salaries, regular 32.80 240-4416-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 1.70 240-4416-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 16.86 Totals: 51.36* 51.36* 245-1010 Cash - Pooled 776.33 245-4417-0100 Salaries, regular 516.80 245-4417-0110 Salaries, overtime 96.90 245-4417-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 31.79 245-4417-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 130.84 Totals: 776.33* 776.33* 250-1010 Cash - Pooled 4,772.61 250-3400 Recreation revenue 335.00 250-4351-0100 Salaries, regular 268.24 250-4351-0150 Salaries, part-time regular pay 390.00 250-4351-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 13.90 250-4351-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 59.00 250-4351-1600 Operating supplies 930.48 250-4352-0100 Salaries, regular 268.24 250-4352-0150 Salaries, part-time regular pay 30.00 250-4352-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 13.90 250-4352-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 59.00 250-4352-1600 Operating supplies 223.45 250-4353-0100 Salaries, regular 336.66 250-4353-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 17.44 250-4353-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 69.12 250-4353-1600 Operating supplies 200.00 250-4354-0100 Salaries, regular 268.24 250-4354-0150 Salaries, part-time regular pay 481.50 250-4354-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 13.90 250-4354-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 59.00 250-4354-1600 Operating supplies 735.54 Totals: 4,772.61* 4,772.61* 255-1010 Cash - Pooled 634.12 255-4350-1600 Operating supplies 627.60 Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:20 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 17 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Account # Description Debit Credit 255-4350-3210 Electricity 6.52 Totals: 634.12* 634.12* 280-1010 Cash - Pooled 427.50 280-4160-3030 Other professional services 427.50 Totals: 427.50* 427.50* 290-1010 Cash - Pooled 150.00 290-4420-3960 Awards 150.00 Totals: 150.00* 150.00* 470-1010 Cash - Pooled 297,770.94 470-4650-3030 Other professional services 27,110.94 470-4650-7050 Construction 270,660.00 Totals: 297,770.94* 297,770.94* 700-1010 Cash - Pooled 8,020.34 700-2325 Deposit - water meter 90.00 700-4820-0100 Salaries, regular 330.80 700-4820-0110 Salaries, overtime 248.10 700-4820-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 29.99 700-4820-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 84.43 700-4820-3630 Training & conferences 117.93 700-4820-5130 Repairs, equipment 56.86 700-4823-0100 Salaries, regular 3,940.78 700-4823-0110 Salaries, overtime 225.68 700-4823-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 215.82 700-4823-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 902.12 700-4823-3220 Natural gas 22.70 700-4823-3630 Training & conferences 45.00 700-4825-0100 Salaries, regular 680.00 700-4825-0110 Salaries, overtime 799.68 700-4825-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 76.65 700-4825-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 153.80 Totals: 8,020.34* 8,020.34* 730-1010 Cash - Pooled 70,817.94 730-4820-0100 Salaries, regular 330.80 730-4820-0110 Salaries, overtime 248.10 730-4820-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 29.98 730-4820-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 84.43 730-4820-3630 Training & conferences 117.92 730-4820-5130 Repairs, equipment 56.86 730-4823-0100 Salaries, regular 4,098.09 730-4823-0110 Salaries, overtime 145.62 730-4823-0150 Salaries, part-time regular pay 468.00 730-4823-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 219.84 730-4823-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 796.02 730-4823-1230 Supplies, equipment 84.95 730-4823-3230 Waste water disposal 62,025.66 730-4826-0100 Salaries, regular 1,381.96 730-4826-0110 Salaries, overtime 48.45 730-4826-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 74.09 730-4826-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 574.49 Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:17:21 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 18 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Account # Description Debit Credit 730-4826-1700 Motor fuels & lubricants 32.68 Totals: 70,817.94* 70,817.94* 750-1010 Cash - Pooled 23,221.73 750-3800 Golf course revenue 696.78 750-4900-0100 Salaries, regular 3,158.50 750-4900-0150 Salaries, part-time regular pay 2,442.38 750-4900-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 263.99 750-4900-0400 Health insurance - employer contribution 645.55 750-4900-1210 Supplies, building & grounds 234.40 750-4900-1220 Supplies, vehicles 67.08 750-4900-1230 Supplies, equipment 24.55 750-4900-1600 Operating supplies 389.16 750-4900-2400 Uniform & clothing 145.31 750-4900-3030 Other professional services 491.00 750-4900-3100 Telephone 55.63 750-4900-4030 Satellites 143.80 750-4901-0100 Salaries, regular 1,609.20 750-4901-0150 Salaries, part-time regular pay 2,127.71 750-4901-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 118.65 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds 7,360.75 750-4901-1600 Operating supplies 26.21 750-4901-3200 Water & sewer 41.52 750-4901-3210 Electricity 1,389.40 750-4901-3220 Natural gas 12.90 750-4902-0100 Salaries, regular 1,165.50 750-4902-0150 Salaries, part-time regular pay 551.39 750-4902-0321 PERA coordinated - employer contribution 60.37 Totals: 23,221.73* 23,221.73* Grand Totals: 547,452.93* 547,452.93* Control Acct: 100-2450 Expenditure Summary 125,074.30 210-2450 Expenditure Summary 863.00 220-1910 Revenue Summary 215.94 220-2450 Expenditure Summary 793.42 225-2450 Expenditure Summary 3,768.40 230-2450 Expenditure Summary 2,853.50 240-2450 Expenditure Summary 51.36 245-2450 Expenditure Summary 776.33 250-1910 Revenue Summary 335.00 250-2450 Expenditure Summary 4,437.61 255-2450 Expenditure Summary 634.12 280-2450 Expenditure Summary 427.50 290-2450 Expenditure Summary 150.00 470-2450 Expenditure Summary 297,770.94 700-2450 Expenditure Summary 7,930.34 730-2450 Expenditure Summary 70,817.94 750-1910 Revenue Summary 696.78 750-2450 Expenditure Summary 22,524.95 Grand Totals: 540,121.43* .00* Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:43:01 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 1 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Ranges: Journal #: (A) Transaction #: (A) Check Date: (R) 05111998 - 05111996 Check#: (A) Bank#: (A) Options: # of copies: 1 Void Checks: N Page on Check: N Check # Vendor Name Check Date Type Jrnl# Trans Account # Title Description Amount Invoice Check 57651 Intl. Personnel Management Ass 05/11/1998 M 128 59 100-4130-3610 Memberships Membership Dues 100.00 Invoice 96130423 Total: 100.00 100.00 57652 New Brighton-Mounds View Chamb 05/11/1998 M 128 103 100-4180-3610 Memberships Registration - Schmidt, Carroll 18.00 100-4130-3610 Memberships Registration - Schmidt, Carroll 18.00 Invoice 98606 Total: 36.00 36.00 57653 Minnesota Department of Revenu 05/11/1998 M 128 77 100-2077 Due to State MN - sales tax Sales & Use Tax .31 100-4100-1600 Operating supplies Sales & Use Tax 13.94 100-4200-1600 Operating supplies Sales & Use Tax 31.17 250-4351-1600 Operating supplies Sales & Use Tax 19.43 250-4351-1600 Operating supplies Sales & Use Tax 8.54 700-4825-3030 Other professional services Sales & Use Tax 4.55 700-4823-1250 Supplies, utilities Sales & Use Tax 7.72 700-2077 Due to State MN - sales tax Sales & Use Tax 1.19 730-4823-3030 Other professional services Sales & Use Tax 8.07 730-4826-1230 Supplies, equipment Sales & Use Tax 29.26 . 750-2077 Due to State MN - sales tax Sales & Use Tax 187.59 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds Sales & Use Tax 52.07 750-4901-3100 Telephone Sales & Use Tax 8.11 750-4901-7030 Equipment Sales & Use Tax 28.87 750-4902-1600 Operating supplies Sales & Use Tax 179.38 750-3681 Sales tax Sales & Use Tax 7,489.60 Invoice 49509930 Total: 8,070.00 8,070.00 8,206.00* Date: 05/22/1998 Time: 15:43:02 City of Mounds View Operator: Kitty Hickok Page: 2 FM Entry - Invoice Cash Disbursement Journal Account # Description Debit Credit Recap Totals: 100-1010 Cash - Pooled 181.42 100-2077 Due to State MN - sales tax .31 100-4100-1600 Operating supplies 13.94 100-4130-3610 Memberships 118.00 100-4180-3610 Memberships 18.00 100-4200-1600 Operating supplies 31.17 Totals: 181.42* 181.42* 250-1010 Cash - Pooled 27.97 250-4351-1600 Operating supplies 27.97 Totals: 27.97* 27.97* 700-1010 Cash - Pooled 13.46 700-2077 Due to State MN - sales tax 1.19 700-4823-1250 Supplies, utilities 7.72 700-4825-3030 Other professional services 4.55 Totals: 13.46* 13.46* 730-1010 Cash - Pooled 37.33 730-4823-3030 Other professional services 8.07 730-4826-1230 Supplies, equipment 29.26 Totals: 37.33* 37.33* 750-1010 Cash - Pooled 7,945.82 750-2077 Due to State MN - sales tax 187.59 750-3681 Sales tax 7,489.80 750-4901-1210 Supplies, building & grounds 52.07 750-4901-3100 Telephone 8.11 750-4901-7030 Equipment 28.87 750-4902-1600 Operating supplies 179.38 Totals: 7,945.82* 7,945.82* Grand Totals: 8,206.00* 8,206.00* Control Acct: 100-2450 Expenditure Summary 181.11 250-2450 Expenditure Summary 27.97 700-2450 Expenditure Summary 12.27 730-2450 Expenditure Summary 37.33 750-1910 Revenue Summary 7,489.80 750-2450 Expenditure Summary 268.43 Grand Totals: 8,016.91* .00* 3 A Page 1 May 11, 1998 UNAPPROVED Mounds View City Council 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 9 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 10 RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA 11 12 Regular Meeting 13 May 11, 1998 14 Mounds View City Hall 15 2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View,MN 55112 16 ********************************************************************************** 17 18 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: 19 20 The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:00 p.m. on May 11, 1998. 21 22 2. ROLL CALL: 23 24 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor McCarty,Council members Koopmeiners, Gunn, 25 Quick and Stigney 26 27 ALSO PRESENT: Chuck Whiting,Clerk Administrator 28 Jim Ericson,Planning Associate 29 Rick Jopke,Community Development Director 30 Cari Schmidt, Assistant to the City Administrator 31 Michael Ulrich,Public Works Director 32 Bob Long, City Attorney 33 34 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 35 36 A. Regular Meeting of April 27, 1998: 37 38 MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Koopmeiners to approve the Minutes of the April 27, 1998 City Council 39 Meeting as presented in writing. 40 41 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 42 43 4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: 44 45 A. Resolution No. 5235 of Appreciation for Firefighter Eric R.Emerson. 46 Page 2 UNAPPROVED May 11, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 Mayor McCarty noted that Mr.Emerson was unable to be present to accept this award and therefore this 2 item would be delayed to another time. 3 4 S. CONSENT AGENDA: 5 6 MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. 7 8 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 9 10 11 6. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: 12 13 Mayor McCarty explained that this is the time for residents to address the council with concerns on items 14 that are not on the Agenda. There were no questions or comments from the public. 15 16 17 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS: 18 19 A. Second Reading and Consideration of Ordinance No.607,an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1008 20 of the Municipal Code entitled "Signs and Billboards". 21 22 Mayor McCarty noted that the public hearing for this item was held on April 27, 1998. 23 24 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 25 607,an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1008 of the Municipal Code entitled"Signs and Billboards"and to 26 waive the reading. 27 28 ROLL CALL VOTE: 29 30 Council member Gunn: aye 31 Council member Koopmeiners: aye 32 Council member Stigney aye 33 Council member Quick aye 34 Mayor McCarty nay 35 36 Mayor McCarty stated he maintains his position that this Ordinance is unnecessary. 37 38 Motion Carries-(4- 1 ) 39 40 Council member Stigney asked that Item 5(D)of the Consent Agenda be read for public record. Mr. 41 Whiting explained that Item 5(D)sets a Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m.,May 26, 1997 for the Introduction 42 (First Reading)of Ordinance No.617,an Ordinance Amending Title 1100,Chapters 1114 and 1115 of the 43 Municipal Zoning Code Relating to Permitted Uses within the B-3,Business Commercial,and B-4, 44 Regional Business Zoning Districts. 45 OVED Page 3 UNAPPR May 11, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 B. Second Reading and Consideration of Ordinance N.615,an Ordinance Vacating a Drainage and 2 Utility Easement over and across Parts of Lots 2 and 3,Block 1,North Star Industrial Park Second 3 Addition. 4 5 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 6 615,an Ordinance Vacating a Drainage and Utility Easement over and across Parts of Lots 2 and 3,Block 7 1,North Star Industrial Park 2nd Addition,and to waive the reading. 8 9 ROLL CALL VOTE: 10 11 Council member Stigney aye 12 Council member Koopmeiners aye 13 Council member Gunn aye 14 Council member Quick aye 15 Mayor McCarty aye 16 17 Motion Carries(5-0) 18 19 C. Consideration of Resolution No.5236,a Resolution Approving a Development Review to allow 20 for the Expansion of the Mermaid Entertainment Center. 21 22 Mr.Ericson,Planning Associate,noted that a copy of the site plan was on display showing the proposed 23 expansion of the Mermaid Entertainment Center. 24 25 Mr.Daniel Hall,representing the Mermaid,has requested a development review to allow for the expansion 26 of their facility by adding eight bowling lanes. The addition would consist of approximately 7,800 square 27 feet. This was approved by the Planning Commission at the May 6, 1998 meeting. He noted that the 28 parking issues which were discussed at the Planning Commission meeting have all been resolved. The site 29 is currently zoned B-3 which at this point does not allow for Bowling Alleys. They are allowed B-4 30 zoning districts. This issue was looked at in the 1970's when Bowling Alleys were added,however a Code 31 Amendment was never accomplished. Therefore,a Public Hearing has been scheduled for May 27th to 32 accomplish this. 33 34 The setbacks do not quite meet code requirements,but they are consistent with what is there now,therefore 35 staff is not proposing that the Mermaid re-construct their entire lot at this time. The only portion of the 36 parking lot that they plan to change will be the North parking lot. 37 38 Resolution No. 5236 will approve the development review requested by the applicant with necessary 39 stipulations. 40 41 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Gunn to Approve Resolution No. 5236,a Resolution Approving a 42 Development Review to allow for the Expansion of the Mermaid Entertainment Center. 43 44 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 45 46 UNAPPROVED Page 4 May 11, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 D. Public Hearing and Second Reading of Municipal Code Changes Allowing a Festival in the Park 2 Beer Garden: 3 4 Ms. Can Schmidt explained that the Festival Committee has expressed an interest in having a beer garden 5 as part of the Festival in the Park Celebration. In order to allow for this, changes will need to be made to 6 the city code. Ms. Schmidt briefly discussed the two changes. 7 8 Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7:10 p.m. There were no questions or comments in regard 9 to this item,and Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 7:11 p.m. 10 11 MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Gunn to approve the second reading and the adoption Municipal Code 12 Section 503.03, Subd.4,and the changes to the Municipal Code Section 909.07, Subd. 11,and to waive 13 the readings. 14 15 ROLL CALL VOTE: 16 17 Council member Koopmeiners aye 18 Council member Gunn aye 19 Council member Quick aye 20 Council member Stigney aye 21 Mayor McCarty aye 22 23 Motion Carried(5-0) 24 25 E. Update on discussing MnDOT concerning access to the proposed Theater Site. 26 27 Mayor McCarty explained that he was directed by the City Council at the last meeting to work with city 28 staff in trying to clarify the city's position with MnDOT and what they will require in terms of access to the 29 theater site. Applications previous to April 21st included no outlets onto County Road H-2 or Long Lake 30 Road. A clarification from MnDOT informed the city that this was not what they intended to state. They 31 would require an opening on secondary roads in the City of Mounds View. 32 33 Mayor McCarty presented a schematic of the collection streets in the City of Mounds View. MnDOT 34 informed him that former county roads are arterial collector roads from Highway 10. It is their rules that 35 a local rule of government compliments their state system with a local system as well. They have indicated 36 that,regardless of any other misunderstandings,the city will be required to give at least one cut on these 37 roads. At a work session on May 5th, the Council decided that if this were the requirements,they would 38 seek an equal distribution to both County Road H-2 and Long Lake Road. After much discussion 39 however,it was felt that the connection to Long Lake Road should be discounted,as there were concerns 40 about congestion at that intersection and the unknowns about crossing wetland properties. 41 42 The offer to the City of Mounds View at this time to further and complete this project,is a full-movement 43 intersection on Highway 10 with a median break,a break on County Road H-2 about mid-way between 44 Long Lake Road and Highway 10 that would bring the driveway out facing two homes that are owned by 45 the property owner at this time. There will be no loss of buildings under this plan, and there is the 46 possibility in the future that we may be able to further enhance access to the property by opening right- uNAppRovED Page 5 May 11, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 turn-in/right-turn-out access down close to Donatelles. These changes are the requirements of MnDOT 2 and are recommended by Mayor McCarty to the City Council for approval. 3 4 Mayor McCarty took this opportunity to address numerous concerns which had been addressed by 5 residents for council's consideration during the public hearing process on this project. 6 7 Mr. Whiting noted that during the afternoon,he received a petition containing approximately 900 8 signatures requesting a referendum initiative in regard to this proposed development. 9 10 Mayor McCarty explained that this meeting was not a Public Hearing on the project. At the last regular 11 Council meeting,it was recommended that action be delayed on the Resolutions approving the project with 12 the proposed property access configurations. The resolutions were approved by the Council,however, 13 and the Public Hearings were not continued. The project has essentially be approved with transportation 14 configurations that MnDOT has since denied. 15 16 Council member Stigney stated he, as well as many of the residents,were under the understanding that this 17 was to be a continuation of the Public Hearing. 18 19 Mayor McCarty noted that this does not prevent any resident from providing input. 20 21 Mr. Whiting explained that due to time requirements,the Public Hearing could not be continued. In regard 22 to the impacts of the petition,he asked Mr.Long to provide information. 23 24 Mr.Long explained that under the City Charter,Chapter 5, Section 5.03,there is a process that the City 25 Clerk must go through to determine the sufficiency of the petition. This must be completed within 10 26 days with a written response. Additionally,the attorney must determine whether or not the form of the 27 questions is sufficient to put into an initiative form under state law. 28 29 Mr.Whiting explained that he will take necessary administrative action and that he will be able to respond 30 on this issue at the next regular council meeting. A formal response,however,will be required within a 10 31 day period,which will occur prior to the May 26th Council meeting. 32 33 Mr.Long,City Attorney,explained that if it is the wish of the Council members to accept the 34 transportation configurations as approved by MnDOT,the Council would need to consider a motion to 35 reconsider Resolution 5226,which was adopted at the last council meeting. If it prevails,the council could 36 then amend the resolution to reflect the recommended changes. 37 38 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to reconsider the action on Resolution No. 5226. 39 40 Council member Stigney stated he would like to hear what the residents have to say in regard to this matter. 41 42 Mayor McCarty explained that the Council would allow comments while the issue is being discussed. 43 44 VOTE: 4 ayes 1 nay(Stigney) Motion Carried 45 46 Mr.Long explained that the council could consider Resolution No. 5226,could be adopted as it is written 47 with one amendment as follows: UNAPPROVED Page 6 May 11, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 "NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby approve a PUD 2 development stage plan dated 3/6/98 AND AS AMENDED 5/11/98,for the O'Neil property, 2430 3 Highway 10, and as described . . . . " 4 5 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve Resolution No. 5226,Approving a PUD 6 Development Stage Plan,for Commercial Uses on the O'Neil Property,2430 Highway 10,AS 7 AMENDED. 8 9 Mr. Jopke,Community Development Director,presented a copy of the revision that has been approved by 10 the MN Department of Transportation and outlined the changes which have occurred. The major change is 11 the public street which runs through the middle of the property,between the theater and the parking area. 12 This is a 50-foot right-of-way with a 30 foot street,widened at the intersection of Highway 10 to 13 accommodate the turn lanes. This road will cut through the 30 foot wide buffer area onto County Road 14 H-2. In order to accommodate the roadway,there have been some minor shifts in the office buildings to 15 the East. Mr.Jopke provided information in regard to setbacks,parking spaces,etc. 16 17 Mr.Jopke noted that he had asked the City Consultant who has previously performed traffic studies on the 18 project to review the changes and to advise as to the impact on surrounding streets. Mr. Jopke provided a 19 summary of their findings. 20 21 Council member Stigney asked who will be responsible for handling any traffic problems which may result 22 on County Road H-2. 23 24 Mayor McCarty indicated that on-site issues will be handled by the developer. Wherever a traffic 25 problem exists in a public right-of-way,the city is duty-bound to respond. 26 27 Council member Stigney stated he would like to include a stipulation in the PUD that it will be the 28 developer's responsibility for handling traffic control problems in and out of his site. 29 30 MOTION by Stigney that a stipulation be added in the PUD that it will be the developer's responsibility to 31 handle traffic control problems in and out of the development site. 32 33 MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF SECOND. 34 35 Council member Quick stated he would like to see a sidewalk added on the westerly side of the new 36 Edgewood between the theater and County Road H-2 to accommodate pedestrian traffic. 37 38 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to amend the main motion to add a sidewalk on the Westerly 39 side of the new Edgewood between the theater and County Road H-2 to accommodate pedestrian traffic. 40 41 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 42 43 Council member Stigney stated the signalized intersection will be of considerable benefit to the theater 44 project and city staff was directed to assist the developer in requesting the signalized intersection. It is his 45 opinion that the city has gone well beyond their responsibilities. The final configurations indicate a 46 significant change in the Municipal center's parking lot,green space,etc. Additionally,it was originally 47 thought that MnDOT would be paying for the traffic signals;now MnDOT will not be paying for any Uir\LAPPROVED Page 7 May 11, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 portion of the signals or the re-alignment of Edgewood. The city will be responsible for a portion of the 2 costs. He is opposed to this. The residents have strongly argued against access from the site to County 3 Road H-2 and to Long Lake Road. The residents make up Mounds View and he believes the Council 4 should consider their concerns. 5 6 Julie Olson,2663 Lake Court Circle,stated in a Resolution dated June 12, 1996,in regard to County Road 7 H-2 and a collector street given back to the city,the resolution states that the roadway segment has been 8 determined to serve a local function only. She also wished to know who will be paying for the roadway 9 through the development and what the approximate cost is. 10 11 Mr. Smith of Anthony Properties stated the road from Highway 10 to County Road H-2 will be a project 12 cost paid for by the developer. 13 14 Mayor McCarty stated,in response to the June 12, 1996 resolution,he is not certain that it was the intent of 15 the council to expect that. 16 17 Mayor McCarty requested a brief recess of the meeting. 18 19 The Council Meeting was re-convened at 8:10 p.m. 20 21 Julie Olson noted that there are three phases to the development process and the city is in the second stage. 22 She asked what happens differently in the fmal plan as far a alterations and changes. 23 24 Mr. Jopke explained that the third stage is the final plan approval. These plans will be the ones submitted 25 for city building permits,etc. 26 27 Mayor McCarty explained that the resolution Ms.Olson referred to earlier,was relative to the turn back 28 process from Ramsey County and only intended to convey that the road will become a local road as 29 opposed to a county road. The designation and use of the road would remain as a collector road. It is not 30 a residential street. 31 32 Cliff Ash,2664 Lake Court Drive,stated he attended the Council work session and feels the project is a 33 "done deal". He wondered where the funds would come from to fund the development. 34 35 Mayor McCarty noted that the funds are from the captured increments of commercial and industrial 36 development. These are the excess funds which are allowed to be used for certain purposes under state 37 law. The funds will not come out of the general property tax fund;this is a separate fund. 38 39 Daniel Rosen, 1200 MN World Trade Center, St.Paul,MN,stated he is an attorney,present on behalf of a 40 sponsoring committee of a Petition for an Initiative. He noted that the 898 registered voters who signed the 41 petition,make up close to 17%of the registered voters who voted in the last general election in the City of 42 Mounds View. Those who signed the petition are asking the Council to defer to the true democratic 43 process. In 120 days there will be the issue on the ballot and it will be voted on by the residents in the City 44 of Mounds View. Residents were told up until four days ago that there would be no outlet onto their 45 street. Now changes have been made and the council is being asked to vote on the change,which will 46 affect many residents. He believes this is a 100%sufficient petition without any legal input from council. 47 He asked that the council defer action on this until the people of Mounds View can speak on this issue. uNAppRovED Page 8 May 11, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 Ruth Berke,2683 Lake Court Circle,provided excerpts from the City Newsletters in regard to the 2 commitments to residents on improving property values in the City of Mounds View. She wondered what 3 the theater project will do to the property values around the site. The council has lost the trust and respect 4 of the community and she asked that the Council reconsider their votes and end the battle. 5 6 Mayor McCarty noted that property rights extend to all-whether residential,commercial or industrial. 7 There have been many delays,but he noted that a great number of the delays have been at the request of 8 the residents for more time to look at other alternatives or different ways of doing the project. Sooner or 9 later that property will be developed and the right of that property owner to access County Road H-2, 10 Highway 10 or Long Lake Road is the same as a resident's right to access those roads. 11 12 Mike Welch,on Irondale Road, stated he feels betrayed by the City Council. He is bothered that there is 13 suddenly a"safety"issue which never was an issue before. He wondered if the safety of those coming 14 from outside Mounds View is more important than those residents of Mounds View. When Highway 10 15 is congested,people will try to fmd the easiest route and he fears that someone will be fatally injured. 16 17 Jerry Linke,2319 Knoll Drive,stated that County Road H-2 is a collector street-it was made that way. 18 He stated he feels it would be beneficial to connect the proposed sidewalk to Long Lake Road. He noted 19 that his concern is losing the soccer field in front of City Hall. He stated he believes in this development 20 and thinks it is a benefit as a whole. 21 22 Dave Nord,2522 Ridge Lane,stated assuming an additional 50 cars will be using County Road H-2 per 23 hour during peak hours,it will defmitely have an impact on the traffic in the area. He asked that the 24 Council please re-consider and not endanger the children in the area by encouraging this development. 25 26 Cyndi Camarillo,5299 Greenfield Avenue, stated her husband is a firefighter in Mounds View and he must 27 respond to calls within a short period of time. The increased traffic will defmitely impact them as well as 28 the increased dust and exhaust. There are too many variables and the one-day traffic study do not 29 accurately depict the impact this will have on the residents in the area. 30 31 Pete Miller,2462 County Road H-2,stated he moved to Mounds View approximately 1-1/2 years ago. He 32 was never approached by the developer,but he was aware of the proposed development. At that time he 33 was not concerned as he was told that the access to the site would be off Highway 10. The increased 34 traffic on County Road H-2 will force him to move. 35 36 Linda Buckardt,2658 Lake Court Drive,stated she would have appreciated a notice of last week's meeting. 37 38 39 Bill Kendall,5270 Edgewood Drive,stated residents have a reason to be angry with the Council. He asked 40 if the council has really thought this through well. 41 42 Al Zdon, 5064 Irondale Road,stated he is past resident of Hibbing,MN. He does not believe the Hibbing 43 City Council would have made one commitment to the residents and then changed their mind or changed 44 major portions of the plans only four days prior to the vote. 45 uNAppRovED Page 9 May 11, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 Dan Johnson,7359 Park View Terrace,noted that within one block of the theater project,there are deaf 2 and blind residents. With the steady increase in traffic on County Road H-2,he has concerns in the safety 3 of these children and asked the Council to consider this when voting on this issue. 4 5 Al Gregerson,7366 Park View Terrace,asked where the cars exiting onto 11-2 will go. Also,there will 6 also be an increase in pedestrian traffic. If the stop sign remains at County Road H-2 and Long Lake and 7 there are 50 cars turning onto Highway 10,it will cause a backup. He believes there will be a greater 8 traffic impact than what is predicted. 9 10 Tracy Swig, 5292 Edgewood Drive, stated she would like to invite the mayor to come to her home from 11 2:00 to 4:30 p.m. and see the number of students walking along Edgewood. She believes these are safety 12 concerns that the Council needs to look at. 13 14 Kelly Rosenthal,2425 Ridge Lane,stated prior to Thursday's meeting,the residents on her street were not 15 informed of the meetings on this development. She stated she cannot understand how the traffic consultant 16 estimated an additional 50 cars per hour on County Road H-2. 17 18 Mr. Jopke explained that the traffic engineer predicted that the vast majority of the patrons will use the 19 Highway 10 entrance. The peak hours are 8:30 to 9:30 p.m. 20 21 Mayor McCarty noted that residents within a designated distance of the proposed development are notified 22 in writing of the Public Hearings in regard to the project. Additionally,the Public Hearings are published 23 in the local newspapers. 24 25 Council member Stigney stated that he has taken the entire community into consideration in his stand on 26 this issue. Additionally,he plans to listen to the residents,as he promised. The cost of the re-alignment of 27 Edgewood should be covered by the developer. He would like the Council to consider a 50/50 split on the 28 costs between the city and the developer. 29 30 MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Gunn to Amend the motion to state that 50%of the cost of the re-alignment 31 of Edgewood and the signalized intersection and associated costs be paid for by the developer. 32 33 VOTE: 2 ayes 3 nays(McCarty/Koopmeiners/Quick) Motion Fails 34 35 MOTION by Stigney to table any action on Resolution No. 5226 until after the pending petition is 36 resolved. MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF A SECOND. 37 38 VOTE ON AMENDED RESOLUTION NO. 5226: 39 40 4 ayes 1 nay(Stigney) Motion Carried 41 42 Mayor McCarty recessed the meeting. 43 44 The meeting was reconvened at 9:25 p.m. 45 UNAPPROVED Page 10 May 11, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 F. Consideration of Resolution NO.5237,Denying a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low 2 Density and High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial for Properties Located at 2625 3 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road. 4 5 Mayor McCarty noted that this resolution will clarify and strengthen the resolution which he presented at 6 the last Council meeting. 7 8 MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Koopmeiners to approve Resolution NO. 5237,Denying a Comprehensive 9 Plan Amendment from Low Density and High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial for 10 Properties Located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road. 11 12 VOTE: 4 ayes 1 nay(Quick) Motion Carried 13 14 G. Consideration of Resolution No.5238,Denying Ordinance No.614,An Ordinance Approving the 15 Re-zoning of Properties Located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road from R-3, 16 Medium Density Residential and R-1,Single Family Residential,to B-2,Limited Business District. 17 18 Mayor McCarty noted that this Resolution will clarify the action of the last council meeting in regard to the 19 Wallgreen's proposal. 20 21 MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Gunn to approve Resolution No. 5238,Denying Ordinance No. 614, 22 An Ordinance Approving the Re-zoning of Properties Located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 23 Eastwood Road from R-3,Medium Density Residential and R-1, Single Family Residential,to B-2, 24 Limited Business District. 25 26 VOTE: 4 ayes 1 nay(Quick) Motion Carried 27 28 H. Consideration of Community Center HVAC Change Order. 29 30 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve the HVAC Change Order as presented for the 31 Community Center. 32 33 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 34 35 8. REPORTS: 36 37 Council member Gunn: no report. 38 39 Council member Quick: no report. 40 41 Council member Stigney: no report. 42 43 Council member Koopmeiners: no report. 44 45 Mayor McCarty: Mayor McCarty informed the community that Dick Meyers,former City Attorney, 46 passed away; he extended prayers and thoughts to his wife and family. Mayor McCarty extended the 47 community's best wishes,condolences and prayers to the family of Melissa Peterson, 18 years old,who UNAPPROVED Page 11 May 11, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 died suddenly on Friday. Thoughts and prayers are extended to the family of Gil Broberg who passed 2 away last week. Gil was a long-time resident of Mounds View and an active Lion's Club member. 3 4 City Administrator: No report. 5 6 City Attorney: No report. 7 8 9. NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION:June 1.1998-6:00 p.m. 9 NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: May 26.1998- 7:00 p.m. 10 11 11. ADJOURNMENT: 12 13 MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Stigney to adjourn the meeting at 9:30 p.m. 14 15 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 16 17 Respectfully submitted, 18 19 qtatam> 20 21 Tamara D. Saefke 22 Recording Secretary 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Page 1 April 27, 1998 APPROVED Mounds View City Council PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA Regular Meeting April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View,MN 55112 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:00 p.m.on April 27, 1998. 2. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor McCarty,Council members Koopmeiners, Quick and Stigney MEMBERS ABSENT: Council member Gunn ALSO PRESENT: Chuck Whiting,Clerk Administrator Jim Ericson,Planning Associate Rick Jopke, Community Development Director Cari Schmidt, Assistant to the City Administrator Michael Ulrich,Public Works Director Bruce Kessel,Finance Director, John Hammerschmidt, Bob Long, City Attorney 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: A. Regular Meeting of April 13, 1998: Council member Koopmeiners noted two corrections. Page 2,line 38 and Page 3,Line 28 should be changed from"Mayor McCarty"to "Acting Mayor Koopmeiners". MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Koopmeiners to approve the Minutes of the April 13, 1998 City Council Meeting AS AMENDED. APPROVED Page 2 April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: None. 5. CONSENT AGENDA: MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Council member Stigney asked that Item 5(D)be pulled from the Consent Agenda for discussion. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to amend their previous motion,and to approve Items A,B and C of the Consent Agenda,with Item D being removed for discussion. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Discussion on Item 5(D): Council member Stigney noted that Item D will change salary ranges and benefit status for golf course personnel. He noted that the Council recently signed a contract with the Golf Course Superintendent to provide incentive pay for personnel for retention purposes,and therefore is surprised to see this item before the Council for approval. He will not support these resolutions. MOTION by Stigney to deny approval of Resolutions 5231-5233. MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve Resolutions 5231-5233. Mayor McCarty noted that these salary changes will not increase the 1998 budget. Council member Stigney noted that this will make golf course personnel eligible for benefits and this is why he opposes it. VOTE: 3 ayes 1 nay(Stigney) Motion Carried 6. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: Mayor McCarty explained that this is the time for residents to address the council with concerns on items that are not on the Agenda. There were no questions or comments from the public. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS: A. 7:05 p.m.Public Hearing and Introduction of Ordinance No.607,an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1008 of the Municipal Code regarding"Signs and Billboards". APPROVED Page 3 April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7:09 p.m. Mr.Jim Ericson,Planning Associate,explained that this Ordinance will amend the sign code so that installation of wall signs,such as those individual tenant signs displayed on the Moundsview Square or Silver View Plaza buildings would require a building permit and be required to pay a building permit fee whereas up to this point they were exempted. The impact to the city is somewhat substantial. Over the past five years,it is estimated that an average of 15 permits would be before the city for a wall sign. Typically the permit fee for this would be approximately$70.00. Over the course of five years,this would have amounted to approximately$4,500 in lost fees. The impact to the tenant is not significant and this permit requirement is typical for most cities. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 607,an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1008 of the Municipal Code pertaining to "Signs and Billboards",and to waive the reading. With no input from the public,Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 7:11 p.m. Mayor McCarty stated he would not be supporting this Ordinance. The charges for putting the signs on the interior walls of the businesses is just one more expense to the businesses and he does not see it as a great help to the city's revenue structure. ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor McCarty nay Council member Koopmeiners: aye Council member Stigney aye Council member Quick aye Motion Carries-(3 - 1 ) B. Consideration of Resolution No.5228,a Resolution Approving a Development Review and Wetland Buffer Permit for the Bridges Technology Park Phase II Expansion,8400 Coral Sea Street, Requested by Bridges Leasing Company,LLC. Mr.Ericson explained that the first phase of this building currently exists on Coral Sea Street. The proposal before the Council is to expand the development to the North on Lot 2,adding 35,000 square feet for a total build-out of 64,376 square feet. City Code requires that a Development Review be completed. All of the dimensional requirements of this development have been met. The drainage plan has been reviewed by the City Engineer as well as the Rice Creek Watershed District and a watershed district permit has been issued. The existing retention pond just West of the existing building will capture any run-off from the new development and therefore the run-off will not affect the wetland. The only issue that currently does not comply with City Code is the parking. The applicant is proposing to construct 171 spaces;the city code requires 200 spaces. The developer has the availability to build 214 spaces,however Page 4 APPROVED April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council they would fall into environmentally sensitive area. The city has allowed for proof of parking in the past. With adjustments to the parking ratio, 169 spaces would be necessary. They are proposing 171 spaces. One of the stipulations of the variance would be that if the use changes or the need exists,the developer would be required to build those proof of parking spaces. Mr. Ericson noted that Item C of the Agenda is an Ordinance which would vacate a portion of a drainage and utility easement over and across Lots 2 and 3 of this development. This is necessary as the proposed building expansion and development will cross over the easements. Additionally,because this development is within 100 feet of a wetland,a wetland buffer permit will need to be issued by the city. One was issued for the development to the South three years ago. The impervious surface that would be within the wetland is approximately 75%of the area. Resolution No. 5228 will approve the development review and the wetland buffer permit for this development. Council member Stigney noted that the proposed setback is 10 feet from the parking area to the wetland and asked what the setback is on the original building. Mr.Ericson noted that it is approximately 18 feet. MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to Approve Resolution NO.5228,Approving a Development Review and Wetland Buffer Permit for the Expansion of the Bridges Technology Park, 8400 Coral Sea Street. MOTION by Stigney to amend the previous motion and to require an 18 foot setback from the wetland rather than a 10 foot setback as proposed. Council member Quick asked if this plan was approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Mr. Ericson responded in the affirmative. MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF SECOND. VOTE ON ORIGINAL MOTION: 3 ayes 1 nay(Stigney) Motion Carried C. 7:10 p.m.Public Hearing and Introduction of Ordinance No.615,an Ordinance Vacating a Portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement over and across Lots 2 and 3,North Star Industrial Park 2nd Addition. Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7:22 p.m. Mr.Ericson noted that the City Attorney has reviewed this and drafted the Ordinance which will accomplish the necessary vacation of the easement. With no comments from the public,Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 7:23 p.m. Page 5 APPROVED April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to approve the Introduction of Ordinance No.615,an Ordinance Vacating a Portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement over and across Lots 2 and 3,North Star Industrial Park 2nd Addition,and to waive the reading. VOTE: Council member Stigney aye Council member Koopmeiners aye Council member Quick aye Mayor McCarty aye Motion Carries(4-0). Mayor McCarty noted that the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 615 will be held on May 11, 1998. D. 7:20 p.m.Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution No. 5219,a Resolution Approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Properties Located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road,Changing the Land Use Designations from Low and High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial,Requested by TOLD Development Company. AND E. 7:20 p.m. Public Hearing and Introduction of Ordinance No.614 an Ordinance to Re-zone Properties Located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood road from R-3,Medium Density Residential and R-1,Single Family Residential,to B-2,Limited Business Districted,Requested by TOLD Development Company. Mr.Ericson asked that Items D and E be considered together as they relate to the same project. He explained that the Planning Commission voted to approve the Resolution to amend the Comprehensive Plan and also to approve the rezoning of the property. The applicant has requested continuance of these items for two weeks until the next regular Council meeting. Attorney Long explained that under the State Statutes, approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment requires a 2/3 vote of the council(in this case,four members of the council to approve). Under state statutes regarding zoning amendments,approval requires a 4/5 vote(all four council members present). MOTION by Mayor McCarty to deny the request for a continuance. Notices have gone out to the public and many residents have taken the time to come to the council meeting(noting the full council chambers). MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to grant the request for a continuance of Items 5 (D)and(E). Attorney Long noted if the continuance is granted and the Public Hearing is continued,a date must be specified in the motion so that the public is made aware. This will also alleviate the necessity to re- publicize the public hearing notice. APPROVED Page 6 April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to AMEND the previous motion to include a continuation date of May 11, 1998. Council member Stigney noted that one of the Council members is absent and he feels this is a pivotal issue. He would like to have all council members available to vote on Items 5 (D)and(E). Council member Koopmeiners felt it may be wise to continue the public hearing AFTER the Comprehensive Plan update for Mounds View has been adopted. MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/McCarty to AMEND the previous motion to include an indefinite date subsequent to the completion and adoption of the Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Mounds View. Council member Stigney asked when the Comprehensive Plan Update is expected to be completed. Mayor McCarty noted that it must be completed by December 31, 1998. Attorney Long noted that if there is not a date certain,the City will be required to re-notice the Public Hearing. Mr.Rick Jopke,Community Development Director,asked about the 60 day approval/denial requirement. Mr.Ericson stated a 60-day extension has already been granted, and May 29, 1998 will be the deadline for a council decision. If the Council does not make a decision by that date,it will automatically be approved. An additional 60 day extension could be granted,but would require the approval of the developer. Mayor McCarty noted that even with an additional 60-day extension,the Comprehensive Plan Update may not be completed. He is concerned about maintaining the confidence and trust of the residents. He feels the Council needs to act decisively and take action tonight. He does not see this proposal as the pivotal point in all that the council is attempting to do. He feels the council members and staff need to honor their commitments to a full,complete public involvement in the Comprehensive Planning process. He is appealing to the Council to deny both of the motions and open the Public Hearing to allow residents to give their input. VOTE on Amending original motion to approve continuation of Public Hearing after a Comprehensive Plan Update has been approved by the City of Mounds View. 3 ayes 1 nay(McCarty) Motion Carried Council member Koopmeiners stated he misunderstood the motion, and he would like to motion to reconsider the previous vote. MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/McCarty to reconsider the previous motion. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/McCarty to withdraw their original motion to continue the Public Hearing after a Comprehensive Plan Update has been approved by the City of Mounds View. Page 7 APPROVED April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council VOTE ON ORIGINAL MOTION: Quick/Stigney to continue the Public Hearing on May 11, 1998. VOTE: 2 ayes 2 nays(Koopmeiners/McCarty) Motion Fails Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7:42 p.m. Carol Arel,7750 Greenwood Drive,presented a petition containing almost 200 signatures in opposition to the project and to the re-zoning of residential property for commercial use. She noted that there will be many residents affected by the rezoning of the property by an increase in traffic,safety concerns and property value issues. She noted that the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council based on what they"think"the new comprehensive plan will include in part. She personally spoke with Dick Thompson at Metropolitan Council and he indicated that the Planning Commission is not allowed to consider in this decision what the new comprehensive plan might be. The amendment request therefore needs to be considered based on the current comprehensive plan. She has read the city's current comprehensive plan and it states that residential development is and will continue to be the primary type of land use development within the community and that low density,single family neighborhoods are to be preserved. She does not feel that a development of this type is a preservation of residential areas. Ms. Arel noted goals contained in the comprehensive plan which she feels are in direct opposition to this type of development. In regard to traffic,the only traffic study that they have seen to date,indicates a 40% increase in traffic daily on Greenwood Drive to over 750 cars. Critical portions of this project have fallen apart and she wonders why it has continued. Other concerns expressed by Ms.Arel included the possibility of a 24-hour pharmacy at Wallgreens, the fact that the project size is less than five acres(city code 1120.03)which is in direct violation of code,the proposal does not fit into the current code requirements,and that many residents did not receive copies of the notice of Public Hearing. She also stated a concern about developers trying to pressure residents into supporting the project. She asked that the Council consider what is best for the residents of Mounds View. Kathy Piche',2204 Lois Drive,stated that for some residents their dream homes are being changed by this development. She personally will not be directly affected however she has concerns as it very well could be her neighborhood. She asked that the Council consider leaving the residential neighborhoods as they are and to continue to provide the sense of privacy and security that each citizen deserves. Janet Wilcox,7815 Eastwood Road,noted that the developer of the townhome project in the area has shown some interest in this particular parcel of land. She is concerned that he may come in with a proposal for the corner if this development is not approved. Residents feel they basically have a choice between a drugstore at the end of the street or more townhomes. She feels this may be why the Council has not heard from very many residents on Eastwood. The proposal does not paint Mounds View as a family-friendly place. Jodi Johnson,7870 Greenwood Drive,stated she is appalled at how the council and staff have been working with this development plan. Residents have indicated their opposition since the beginning and she feels proceeding with the project is a blatant disregard for the residents'feelings. APPROVED Page 8 April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road,stated he is concerned about the residents on Greenwood due to the traffic,but he feels residents need to consider the number of businesses that have been lost to other communities. People need to start thinking about the tax base. Where should commercial businesses locate? He feels this area is more appropriate for business than for residential as there are safety concerns with regard to children and Highway 10. JoAnn Colleen,2617 County Road I,stated her property is immediately East of the proposed Wallgreens site. Highway 10 has been designated as the main corridor where businesses and development need to locate. At some point,residences will be affected by development on Highway 10. Wallgreens will be paying a considerable amount more in taxes than what the was being paid by the four residences on that site. Ms. Colleen stated she is in support of the proposed development. She noted,however that there are different options for routing traffic and it is important for the City to look at those options if the development is to proceed. Lance King,7751 Greenwood Drive,stated he was out of town and therefore did not have the opportunity to sign the petition in opposition to the development. He noted that he did not receive a notice of the Public Hearing. To the public,it appears that the Council has already made a decision on this issue. He stated he finds it difficult to believe that Wallgreens would choose to locate in an area where fast food restaurants are struggling,where there are a number of vacant lease spaces available and where a Wallgreens is located within less than 3 miles. Jim Schmidt,5446 Erickson Road,stated he feels there are other,more appropriate areas in the community for a Wallgreens store and is alarmed that the Council would consider removing four residential homes to make way for a commercial development. Without access to Highway 10,traffic will have a substantial impact on the residents in the neighborhood. Steve Pansen,7721 Greenwood Drive,stated he is disappointed that this development has moved forward without the public receiving more information. He feels the development will have an impact on the safety of the children in the neighborhood. Gayla Keyer,7730 Greenwood Drive,stated she has worked actively on this issue for the past six months. Unfortunately,she did not have much support and she eventually she sold out. She stated she is happy to see the residents back together. She feels,however,that the developer has essentially destroyed the neighborhood. Terri Smith,2653 Scottland Court,wondered when her home would be affected. She feels it is unfair that homes are being taken away. Bob Glazer,2625 Hillview Road,asked why Mounds View needs this development. Gerald Arel,7750 Greenwood Drive,stated he opposes the proposed change to the comprehensive plan and the re-zoning of the property. He stated residents were offered money in exchange for silencing their voices. He stated he is not against Wallgreens,but is against what is being done in regard to amendments to the comprehensive plan. APPROVED Page 9 April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council Crystal Wilson,7764 Greenwood Drive, stated she cannot believe that the community is willing to open another business and jeopardize the Snyders store in the process. She asked that council members consider what this will do to her property. With no further comments from the public,Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 8:29 p.m. Mayor McCarty stated he feels the city acted appropriately and done the best job possible in getting the Public Hearing notices out to residents. If residents did not receive a public notice on of the hearing at their home and are in the designated affected area, it is possible that the notice went to the owner of record. If residents have purchased their homes on a Contract for Deed or if there is another owner on the title,it is likely that they received the notice. He noted that staff will continue to try to improve on this in the future by making all mail notices duplicate in the case of a non-resident owner. Notices are published in the local newspapers as well. The city does everything in their power to get information out to the public, including televising of all council meetings. Residents must take responsibility as well to read the notices and keep themselves informed. Mayor McCarty noted that the council and staff are bound by state law and the residents'constitutional rights to apply the laws equally and without bias. He provided information in regard to the townhouse project which was recently approved by the council. The developer of that project had indicated his interest in the city's vacant lot on the corner of Eastwood and Highway 10 as well as a long term loan. In the process,and in consideration of the public's opposition,two council members asked if the council could look at another use for the city's property which would presumably work better as a commercial property. At that time, it was decided to allow another use for that property to be pursued. Subsequent to that,the city received a proposal which involved the residential homes. The City Council and Planning Commission have been proceeding in the direction of what they understood that the community wished to see. Mr.Bob Cunningham,Vice President of Development for TOLD Development,stated it is obvious that there is a preponderance in the community against this project. They came into the community thinking that they would be adding a retail store at the busiest intersection in Mounds View. They paid the homeowners what they believed to be a fair price for the property and worked out arrangements with adjacent property owners to allow them to litigate for the what they believed to be negative impact to their property. They worked with staff and the Planning Commission to comply with their requests, and he stated it has never been their intention to cause contention in the neighborhood. They are willing to abide by the Council's decision. Mayor McCarty explained that the proposal includes a request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment to change the land use from high and low density residential to neighborhood commercial. Neither the Comprehensive Plan nor the City Code currently provide for a Neighborhood Commercial classification. A drugstore would fall under B-3 classification which is not a neighborhood oriented code classification. He would suggest that the Council consider a substitute resolution of denial rather than the resolution of approval. Copies of the proposed resolution were distributed to the council members and Mayor McCarty took the opportunity to read this resolution. MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Koopmeiners to approve Resolution No.5216,denying the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Properties Located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood APPROVED Page 10 — April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council Road, and a change in land use designations from high and low density residential to Neighborhood Commercial,Requested by TOLD Development Co. Council member Stigney stated feels this proposal is far better than other options for the property. At the time of the townhome proposal,the residents on Eastwood did not want townhomes proposed for the area. He feels is important that the city listen to the residents of Eastwood as well as the residents of Greenwood in determining what goes in on that corner. VOTE: 3 ayes 1 nay(Quick) Motion Carried MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Koopmeiners to authorize the development of a second resolution denying the zoning change request. VOTE: 3 ayes 1 nay(Quick) Motion Carried F. 7:25 p.m.Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution NO. 5222,a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit(CUP)for an Over-sized Accessory Building at 2824 Woodale Drive. Mr.Ericson explained that Ronald Overton has applied for a conditional use permit to convert an existing single-car garage to an accessory building,moving it 100 feet back toward the rear of his property and using it as a shed/storage building. In it's place,he is proposing to construct a 2-car garage. The shed/storage building would exceed the city's limits for an accessory building which is 216 square feet when not being used as a garage,and therefore will require a conditional use permit. The requirements of the CUP have been met. He noted that staff has included stipulations in the resolution which he proceeded to go through. MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/McCarty to Approve Resolution No. 5222,Approving a Conditional Use Permit(CUP for an Over-sized Accessory Building at 2824 Woodale Drive. Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 8:50 p.m. With no comments from the public,Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 8:51 p.m. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried G. 7:30 p.m.Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution No.5223,a Resolution Approving an Over-sized Garage at 7858 Long Lake Road,Requested by Thomas Lammi. Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 9:00 p.m. Mr.Ericson explained that this applicant is proposing to add to his existing garage a 616 square foot garage addition. The addition would attach seamlessly to the rear of the garage and house,tying into the existing roofline, siding and soffits. A Conditional Use Permit is required for any garages exceeding 864 square feet in size. The proposed size of the garage after completion is 1,246 square feet. It was noted that this proposal complies with all CUP requirements. With no comments from the public,Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 9:03 p.m. Page 11 April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Approve Resolution No. 5223,a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for an Over-sized Garage at 7858 Long Lake Road. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried H. 7:35 p.m.Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution No. 5224,a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit(CUP)for Merryville Farm Market to allow for an Outdoor Sales operation at Mounds View Square. Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 9:04 p.m. Mr.Ericson explained that this is request is for a CUP for Merryville Farms to allow them to operate an outdoor produce stand in the parking lot of Moundsview Square Shopping Center. This has been operated at this location for the past three years and there have been no problems. The CUP will allow the city to enforce the time,manner and place provisions for the operation of this stand. All requirements for the CUP have been met. Staff is currently looking at the code in terms of possible amendments so that in future years this request would not need to go before council as a CUP. With no comments from the public,Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 9:05 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Stigney to approve Resolution No. 5224,Approving a Conditional Use Permit(CUP)for Merryville Farm Market to Allow for an Outdoor Sales Operation at Mounds View Square. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried I. Consideration of Resolution No.5227,a Resolution Approving a Minor Subdivision of Property Located at 7581 Spring Lake Road,Requested by Charles and Shirley Schultz. Mr.Ericson explained that this applicant is requesting approval to split their property located at 7581 Spring Lake Road into two lots. One lot would be 85 feet,leaving 80 feet for the existing home. The City Attorney has reviewed the necessary documents and all dimensional requirements have been met. In regard to park dedication fees,the Parks and Recreation Commission has requested the fee be set at $1,032. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to Approve Resolution No. 5227,a Resolution Approving a Minor Subdivision Located at 7581 Spring Lake Road,Requested by Charles and Shirley Schultz. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried J. 7:40 p.m.Public Hearing. 1. Consideration of Resolution No.5226,a Resolution Approving a Development Stage Review Plan for the Anthony Properties Management/O'Neil PUD at 2430 Highway 10. 2. Consideration of Resolution No.5229,a Resolution Approving a Wetland Buffer Permit at 2430 Highway 10. APPROVED Page 12 April27, 1998 Mounds View City Council 3. Consideration of Resolution No.5230,Concerning Access to Anthony Properties Management/O'Neil PUD at 2430 Highway 10. Mr.Rick Jopke, Community Development Director,provided a brief re-cap of this development proposal. The applicant,Anthony Properties is proposing to construct a 63,000 square foot, 15 screen 2,188 seat movie theater,three 11,000 square foot one-story office buildings, a 5,000 square foot restaurant and a 6,400 square foot retail/restaurant building on the site located at 2430 Highway 10. Mr.Jopke noted that there are three steps in the PUD process-a general concept plan,a development stage plan and a final plan. On May 12, 1997 the City Council approved the General Concept Plan for this development. The Development Stage Plan,which is before the Council now is the next step in the process. This includes a more detailed plan of the development. The Planning Commission reviewed the plan and recommended approval of the Development Stage Plans with a number of stipulations. The City Council must conduct a Public Hearing and grant approval,resubmit the plan to the Planning Commission for further consideration or deny approval of the plan. There is a 60 day requirement for Council approval which is due to expire on May 17, 1998,and if the council does not approve the project,they must either deny it or grant a 60-day extension. Mr.Jopke explained the review and evaluation criteria for development stage plans and provided a brief summary of staffs fmdings regarding each. Essentially, all criteria has been met,with the exception of the signalized intersection on Highway 10 which has not obtained approval from MnDOT. It was noted that the signalized intersection as proposed with a right-in and right-out is important to the development of the property and working with MnDOT in regard to this issue will be important. Mr.Jopke discussed the changes which have been made since the general concept plan which was approved in 1997. The Planning Commission has reviewed the development stage review and is recommending Council approval with stipulations. Mr.Jopke went through the stipulations of the resolutions. Mr.Wendell Smith of Anthony Properties provided a brief overview of the history of the project. He provided copies of the plans which were approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council in 1997, and discussed how the plans have changed since that time. He noted that the revised plan has better quality than the original plan. He provided renderings of the proposed theater and office buildings. He noted that there are still no access points onto County Road H-2 or Long Lake Road. A diagram was provided depicting the new proposed signalized intersection. He noted that it is very important from a safety and traffic standpoint that this signalized intersection be approved and it was their understanding that MnDOT had approved it. On April 22nd, however,they were notified that MnDOT will not agree to this signalized intersection without access being provided to Long Lake Road or County Road H-2. Mr. Smith asked that the Council approve the development plan,the buffer permit and strongly endorse the intersection as shown on the plan and work with MnDOT to obtain permission of the signalized intersection before the commencement of construction. Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 9:55 p.m. Milly Ash,2664 Lake Court Drive, asked for a clarification on the access to the restaurant site from Long Lake Road. Mr. Smith noted that the plan shows a entrance and exit to the restaurant site from Long Lake Road,however MnDOT has indicated that they will not allow for a right-in/right-out to Highway 10 and APPROVED Page 13 April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council the access as shown is the only one to the restaurant site. Ms.Ash stated her concern that people wanting to avoid delays at the intersection of Long Lake Road and Highway 10 may choose to cut through the restaurant site. Mr. Smith stated this is a possibility,however he does not feel people will fmd that it saves them any time to use this route. Julie Olson,2663 Lake Court Circle,asked if the developer has guaranteed in writing that they will provide a share of the cost for the signalized intersection. Mayor McCarty noted that Resolution 5230 will require the developer to partake in the cost($187,500). Steve Miller,2614 Clearview,stated in attending earlier meetings in regard to the development,it was his understanding that the developer would assume the cost of any adjustments which needed to be made to get in and out of that property. Why has the city, since that time,agreed to share in that cost? Mayor McCarty noted that with the re-alignment of Edgewood Drive,the city will gain approximately an additional 2 acres of developable commercial land which is valued at approximately$250,000 plus any future development tax revenues that are gained. Additionally,it would provide better access to the community center as well as other benefits to the community. Mr.Miller asked how long it is anticipated to take to re-coup the$440,000. Mayor McCarty noted that this information will not be known until such time as the land is developed,however history has shown that commercial and industrial tax base has been very kind. Mr. Whiting noted that the$442,500 for the city's portion was a high estimate and may not cost that amount. Julie Olson,2663 Lake Court Circle asked if Resolution 5230 could be amended to add that there would be no access to County Road 11-2 or Long Lake Road. Mayor McCarty stated he believes this is already in the recommendation from the Planning Commission and Resolution 5230 merely supports the Council's position on the signalized intersection. Mr. Jay Anthony of Anthony Properties explained that full access to the development is critical and it is his feeling that they can not proceed with merely a right-in/right-out access to the development. The intersection as proposed will not only benefit the theater,but also the community center and the safety off of residents at the Edgewood/Highway 10 intersection. Jerry Linke,2319 Knollwood Drive,stated he is generally in approval of the development but does have concerns. In reference to the comment that city would gain approximately two acres with the realignment of the intersection, he noted that this is already city land(park land)and that with the realignment of the parking lot,the city would actually lose approximately four acres of park land. Mayor McCarty stated this would be assuming that the city would use the land to the West of the realigned Edgewood. Furthermore,the area that Mr.Linke refers to as a soccer field is not a regulation soccer field and there are other fields in the community that are not currently being used. Other concerns expressed by Mr.Linke included whether the developer has provided a space for recycling of trash and the necessity of screening the proposed lighting for drivers on Highway 10. He noted that County Road H-2 is a major arterial and that there should be access to it. Julie Olson asked if the Council could consider tabling the resolutions until a decision is made in regard to the proposed signalized intersection. She believes that without a curb cut onto Long Lake Road,MnDOT will not approve the signal and therefore the project likely cannot proceed. APPROVED Page 14 April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council Resident,2698 Lake Court Drive,stated he believes the biggest concern is the access to Long Lake Road or County Road H-2 and that all residents would appreciate an amendment stating that this will not be negotiated as a part of the any deal with MnDOT. Bob Holmback,2596 Mounds View Drive,stated he does not even like the curb cut to the restaurant. He stated he feels it is the general consensus of the residents that Long Lake Road should not be cut into. Lynn Thomason,5301 Edgewood Drive,stated she had spoken with Scott Peterson of MnDOT in regard to this issue and she was led to believe that MnDOT will not allow a signal at the intersection. She presented a petition signed by residents to the south and west of the proposed theater project opposing any plan that would allow access to County Road H-2 and Long Lake Road. Dana Mandoza,2633 Clearview Avenue,stated concerns as to water run-off and its effect on the wetlands. Barb Haake stated this plan was presented to the Rice Creek Watershed District on Wednesday evening and in general it was approved. Mr.Brian Mundstock, Sunde Engineering,presented information in regard to storm water management plan for the proposed development site. He noted that the City Engineer and the Engineers for the Rice Creek Watershed District have reviewed the plans. Mr.Mandoza asked what assurances the city has that the developer will complete the project as planned and,if not, what can be done to hold him accountable. Attorney Long explained that the developer will execute a Development Agreement with the city that will obligate the developer to perform according to standards set forth. There would be performance bonds in place as well. Mr.Mandoza asked if the city could require the developer to complete certain phases of the project before others. He has concerns that the developer may change the plans after experiencing problems in leasing some of the office space. Mr.Anthony noted that he has already executed a long term lease on the property and has spent a considerable amount of money on the project to this point. He has invested more than two years in this project and expects that many millions of dollars will be invested prior to its completion. Mr.Mandoza stated many people have indicated their opposition to the project and it is frustrating to see that their feelings are not considered by the council on this matter. Mayor McCarty noted that those who attend the meetings are usually those in opposition. Rarely do residents come offering support. Furthermore he has a mandate from many of the residents to lower their property taxes and one way of doing that is to enhance the city's commercial and industrial business base. Steve Miller,2614 Clearview,asked why a project such as this is even being considered for the area. There is already a theater complex in Coon Rapids and with the congestion problems on Highway 10,he wonders if this is really the best project for the area. He is not opposed to development on that site,but does not feel a theater is needed. APPROVED Page 15 April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council Mr.Whiting stated that he has not been approached by any other developers for the development of that property. Mr. Smith indicated that there has been interest in the site by other developers for high density housing and shopping centers,however this did not seem to be a good use for this type of land. A discussion followed in regard to the continuation of the Public Hearing to the May 11, 1998 City Council meeting. It was felt that this would allow staff to meet with MnDOT regarding the signalized intersection. Ms. Olson wondered if the Council has the authority to alter the plans should MnDOT formally deny a signalized intersection and the developer wish to pursue alternatives. Mayor McCarty stated that this could be done at the Public Hearing. David Jahnke complimented the developer on his involvement with the neighborhood during the planning process. He noted that many of the people present at the Public Hearing did not attend informational meetings that were set up between the developer and the residents. Barb Haake noted that any changes to the plan would need to be re-visited by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Sara Weeks,2653 Scottland Court,noted that a curb cut onto Long Lake Road or County Road H-2 would provide a better flow of traffic. With no further comments,Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 11:10 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Approve Resolution No. 5226,a Resolution Approving a Development Stage Review Plan for the Anthony Properties Management/O'Neil PUD at 2430 Highway 10,Approve Resolution No. 5229,A Resolution Approving a Wetland Buffer Permit at 2430 Highway 10 and to Approve Resolution No. 5230 Concerning Access to Anthony Properties Management/O'Neil PUD at 2430 Highway 10. Council member Stigney stated he felt the Council should consider the concerns raised by the residents. Residents have stated their opposition to paying the$442,000 share to realign the road and install a signal. It was his understanding that the developer would solve the traffic problem. He does not feel it is a good project as it is proceeding. The criteria is not met and he will not support spending that kind of money. Mayor McCarty noted that the$442,000 is a"worst case scenario"and the Council has not committed to a ring-road. 'VOTE: 3 ayes 1 nay(Stigney) Motion Carried Mr.Whiting noted that a meeting has been set up with MnDOT for Thursday,April 30th. Results of this meeting will be reported at the Council Work Session scheduled for Monday,May 4, 1998. K. Consideration of Entering into a Contract with Coca Cola for the Purchase of Soft Drinks for the City and The Bridges Golf Course. APPROVED Page 16 April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to authorize the City to enter into a contract with Coca Cola for the purchase of soft drinks for the city and The Bridges Golf Course. Council member Stigney asked what the difference would be if the city owned their own vending machines versus stocking machines owned by others. Mr.Kessel stated he did not have this information available,however if the city stocks the machines the price the city pays for the soft drinks is reduced. Council member Stigney stated he could not approve this contract without obtaining additional information. VOTE: 3 ayes 1 nay(Stigney) Motion Carried L. Consideration of Supplemental Services Agreement for Phase II Construction of the Community Center. Mr.Ulrich,Public Works Director,explained that Phase Ii construction meetings are taking place at the construction shack for phase II of the community center. It is imperative that the city have the services of the architect and engineers and their consultants who have drawn up the plans in attendance at these meetings. The original contract with WAI Continuum,allows for 12 meetings and this was adequate for Phase I of the project,however Phase II take considerably longer and staff is requesting that an additional 25 to 30 meetings be authorized in the Supplemental Services Agreement at a cost of$7,800.00. Council member Stigney asked why these costs were not included as part of the original contract. Mr.Ulrich noted that the standard contract calls for 12 meetings. This is not adequate for a project which is expected to run 40 weeks. MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to authorize staff to execute a Supplemental Services Agreement for additional attendance at construction meetings for Phase Ii of the Community Center. VOTE: 3 ayes 1 nay(Stigney) Motion Carried M. Consideration of Community Center Construction Oversight Agreement. Mayor McCarty noted that this was an offer received from Mr.Linke for construction oversight services at the Community Center. Attorney Long explained that the contract with the Construction Management company includes a 3%fee tied to the$3.5 million project and the council has the authority to increase or decrease the construction costs. Mr.Linke explained that any change orders or increases in the construction costs increase the amount that the construction manager receives. Mayor McCarty stated the city has a Construction Manager and he is confident with those services. Page 17 April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council N. Consideration of Festival in the Park Beer Garden. Ms. Cari Schmidt,Assistant to the City Administrator stated the Mounds View Festival Committee has requested a beer garden as part of the festival. If this is to take place, changes to the Municipal Code will be required. The city has basically two options for consideration: 1) The city could consider allowing 3.2 beer in the City Hall Park which would be open to anyone;or 2) the city could limit beer in the City Hall Park to the Festival only. The Parks&Recreation Commission has recommended that alcohol be limited only to the Festival in the Park. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to begin the process to amend the ordinance in accordance with Draft Option#2. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried O. Consideration of Consulting Services with WOLD Architects and Engineers for City Hall HVAC and Related Building Renovations Project. MOTION by Stigney to table this item. MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to approve the Contract for Consulting Services with WOLD Architects and Engineers for City Hall HVAC and Related Building Renovations Project. Council member Stigney noted that the total project cost is now estimated at$315,000. He feels the city should look at other options. Mr.Ulrich noted that this will go through a competitive bidding process. VOTE: 3 ayes 1 nay(Stigney) Motion Carried P. Extension of Cable TV Franchise Agreement Ordinance. Mr.Whiting explained that the current extension of the cable television franchise ordinance is due to expire on April 20, 1998. At the May 4th Work Session,he has requested Coralie Wilson and Thomas Creighton to be present to explain the(malities of the negotiated agreement for a new franchise. In the meantime,the existing agreement needs to be amended. Ordinance 616 will amend Ordinance No. 611 and extend the franchise term to July 20, 1998. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to approve the Introduction of Ordinance No.616,to waive the reading and to set a Public Hearing and Second Reading of this Ordinance for Monday,May 11, 1998. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to reconsider the Introduction of Ordinance No. 616(no Roll Call Vote). ROLL CALL VOTE: APPROVED Page 18 April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council Council member Stigney aye Council member Quick aye Council member Koopmeiners aye Mayor McCarty aye Motion Carried(4-0) MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to reconsider Item(N.) Consideration of Festival in the Park Beer Garden: MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Approve the Introduction of Ordinance No. ,to waive the reading and to set a Public Hearing and the Second Reading on Monday,May 11, 1998. ROLL CALL VOTE: Council member Quick aye Council member Koopmeiners aye Council member Stigney aye Mayor McCarty aye Motion Carried(4-0) 8. REPORTS: Council member Quick: no report. Council member Stigney: no report. Council member Koopmeiners: no report. Mayor McCarty: no report. City Administrator: Mr. Whiting suggested that Item 10(A)be considered under Council Business,rather than under the Closed Session. City Attorney: No report. 9. NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION: May 4.1998-6:00 p.m. NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: May 11.1998- 7:00 p.m. 10. A. Consideration of Golf Course Equipment Purchase. MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Quick to authorize the purchase of an aerator for the Bridges Golf Course in the amount of$32,000. (including shipping). VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Page 19 APPROVED April 27, 1998 Mounds View City Council MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Stigney to delay the Closed Session portion of the City Council meeting until after the EDA Meeting. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 11. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to adjourn the meeting at 11:53 p.m. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Respectfully submitted, je A/KOtlai Tamara D. Saefke Recording Secretary 58 PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA Special Meeting April 15, 1998 Mounds View City Hall 2410 Highway 10, Mounds View,MN 55112 Index to Minutes Page Planning Case No. 522-98, 2535-2585 Highway 10(Moundsview Square), 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 543-98 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Temporary Produce Sales, Craig Gild (Merryville Farm Market) Planning Case No. 520-98, 2824 Woodale Drive, Consideration of Resolution 3 No. 540.98 Approving a Condition al Use Permit for and Oversized Accessory Building,Ronald P. Overton Planning Case No. 518-98, 7581 Spring Lake Road, Consideration of Resolution 5 No. 539-98 Approving a Minor Subdivision, Charles Schultz Planning Case No. 516-98, 7858 Long Lake Road, Consideration of Resolution 6 No. 541-98 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for and Oversized Garage, Thomas Lammi Planning Case No. 507-98, 2625 Highway 10, 7715-7761 Eastwood Road, 9 Consideration of Resolution Nos. 536-98 and 538-98 Denying the Walgreen's Development Request, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning Requests, TOLD Development Company Planning Case No. 514-98, 8400 Coral Sea Street, Consideration of Resolution 12 No. 542-98 Approving the Development Review for Completion of the 2nd Phase of Bridges Technology Building Project,Bridges Leasing Company, LLC Planning Case No. 517-98, 2430 Highway 10 (O'Neil Property), Consideration of 14 Resolution No. 544-98 Approving the Development Review Stage of the PUD, Preliminary Plat and Wetland Buffer Permit, AP Mounds View Limited Partnership (Anthony Properties) Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 2 1. Call To Order The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Peterson at 7:00 p.m., April 15, 1998. 2. Roll Call Members present: Chairperson Peterson, Commissioners Brasaemle, Brooks (departed 9:25), Johnston,Miller, Obert,and Stevenson. Also present: Community Development Director Jopke, Planning Associate Ericson, Council Liaison Koopmeiners, and Recorder Dave Hix. 3. Citizens'Request and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda There were no citizen requests or comments on items not on the agenda. 4. Approval of Minutes No minutes were considered for approval. 5. Planning Case No.522-98 2535 - 2585 Highway 10 (Moundsview Square) Applicant: Craig Gilb (Merryville Farm Market) Consideration of Resolution No. 543-98 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Temporary Produce Sales. The applicant, Craig Gilb (Merryville Farm Market), was present. Associate Ericson made his presentation as follows: Merryville Farm Market was requesting a Conditional Use Permit to operate an outdoor produce stand in the parking lot of Moundsview Square Shopping Center from July 1, 1998 to September 30, 1998. Hours of operation were stated as 10:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m., seven days a week. The stand requires no utility hook-ups. The stand was granted a CUP the last two years at this same location. Staff stated they were not aware of any problems associated with this operation. Linder's Greenhouses, which was also granted an outdoor-sales CUP, will be dismantling its greenhouse sometime in between June 30 and July 15, so the overlap of operation could be less than the possible 15 days. This overlap, if any, will cause little impact to parking, Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 3 as the produce stand occupies only 110 square feet of the parking lot. Signage for the produce stand will be accomplished with small banners affixed to the stand structure and lettering on the canvas roof. According to the City Attorney, the City cannot impose any licensing requirements upon the applicant. The City can, however, control the time, place and manner of the operation through a Conditional Use Permit, so long as the requirements do not, in effect, prohibit the use or impose undue hardship. Staff is recommending the approval of Planning Commission Resolution 543-98, a resolution recommending to the City Council that they approve a Conditional Use Permit for Merryville Farm Market to operate an outdoor produce stand at Moundsview Square Shopping Center from July 1, 1998 to September 30, 1998, with stipulations. The stipulations were listed as follows: 1. The facility shall be allowed to operate from July 1, 1998, to September 30, 1998. 2. The hours of operation of the facility shall not exceed 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 3. Signage shall be allowed only as affixed to the gazebo base and/or canvas roof 4. Lighting for the use shall be supplied by existing parking lot standards. Chairperson Peterson asked the applicant if he would like to make a presentation. Craig Gilb,Merryville Farm Market, declined to make a presentation but offered to answer any questions that the staff or the Commission might have. Motion/Second: Stevenson/Brasaemle to approve Resolution 543-98, a resolution recommending to City Council approval of a Conditional Use Permit for outdoor sales at Mounds View Square, requested by Merryville Farm Market;Planning Case No. 522-98, with stipulations. Ayes - 7 Nays - 0 The motion carried. Associate Ericson told the applicant the Public Hearing and meeting with the City Council was scheduled for April 27, 1998. 6. Planning Case No. 520-98 2824 Woodale Drive Applicant: Ronald Overton Consideration of Resolution No. 540-98 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for and Oversized Accessory Building Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 4 The applicant,Ronald Overton, was present. Associate Ericson, gave his presentation as follows: Ronald Overton was requesting permission to convert an existing 14'x 22'single-car garage to an accessory building. His intent is to move the existing garage 100' back toward the rear of his property, located at 2824 Woodale Drive. In place of the moved garage, Mr. Overton would be constructing a detached two-car garage. No plans for the new garage have been submitted. Staff is recommending approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 540-98, recommending to the City Council approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Ronald Overton, allowing a 308 sq.ft. oversized shed at 2824 Woodale Drive, with stipulations. The stipulations were listed as follows: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of City Council approval, and a receipt of such recording shall be provided to the City of Mounds View. 2. The shed shall be maintained into the future so as to provide a uniform and consistent building appearance with the existing house. 3. The shed shall not be used for living space or other uses not allowed by the district in which it is located or by the Zoning Code. Should the use change for which the permit was granted, the Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void. 4. No other sheds or accessory buildings, other than the proposed garage, shall be allowed on this lot. 5. There shall be no vehicle access to this shed, nor shall any vehicle be stored within said structure. 6. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure a high quality of workmanship and timely completion of the relocation. Commissioner Brasaemle asked for a clarification as to what constituted a"vehicle". Associate Ericson stated snowmobiles, ATVs, boat, garden tractor, etc are excluded from the Code's definition of a vehicle. The intended Code definition is for items such as cars, vans, etc. Chairperson Peterson asked the applicant if he would like to make a presentation. Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 5 Mr. Overton, declined to make a presentation. He told the Commission he is waiting on a call from the City's building inspector in regards to the required foundation. Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Miller to approve resolution 540-98, a resolution recommending the City Council approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow for an oversized storage shed for Ronald Overton, 2824 Woodale Drive: Mounds View Planning Case No. 520-98, with stipulations, as amended. Ayes -7 Nays - 0 The motion carried. Associate Ericson stated that a Public Hearing and meeting before the City Council has been set for April 27, 1998. 7. Planning Case No. 518-98 7581 Spring Lake Road Applicant: Charles Schultz Consideration of Resolution No. 539-98 Approving a Minor Subdivision The applicant, Charles Schultz, was present. Associate Ericson gave his presentation as follows: Charles and Shirley Schultz were requesting approval of a minor subdivision to create two lots from their property located at 7581 Spring Lake Road. A copy of the surveyor's certificate, as required by the City, was submitted. The applicant proposed to split off 85', leaving 80'for the existing property. All applicable setback requirements would be met under this configuration. Staff is recommending approval of Resolution 539-98, a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of this minor subdivision subject to stipulations. The stipulations were listed as follows: 1. The applicant shall make payment of a park dedication fee of$1032, as specified by Section 1204.02. 2. The applicant shall record the City Council resolution of approval, the Certificate of Survey and the drainage and utility easement document with Ramsey County Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 6 within sixty(60) days of final adoption, and present proof of such recording o the City of Mounds View, or this approval shall be null and void. Chairperson Peterson asked the applicant for their presentation. Mr.Schultz declined to make a presentation. He added, the park dedication fee was extremely high. Associate Ericson told the Commission that the Park Dedication Fee for this minor subdivision would be reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission at its April meeting, scheduled before the case was to be heard by the City Council, and a recommendation would accompany the Case to the City Council meeting. Motion/Second: BrasaemleBrooks to approve Resolution 539-98, a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of a minor subdivision for Charles and Shirley Schultz, 7581 Spring Lake Road,Mounds View Planning Case No. 518-98, with stipulations as stated above. Ayes - 7 Nays - 0 The motion carried. Chairperson Peterson told the applicant the Case would be passed on to the City Council for their consideration at its April 27, 1998 meeting. 8. Planning Case No.516-98 7858 Long Lake Road Applicant: Thomas Lammi Consideration of Resolution No. 541-98 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Garage. The applicant, Thomas Lammi, was present. Associate Ericson made his presentation as follows: Thomas Lammi has requested permission to construct a 616 sq. ft. garage addition to his house located at 7858 Long Lake Road. The proposed addition would attach seamlessly to the rear of the existing garage and house, tying into the existing roofline, siding, and soffits. Backyard accessory buildings cannot exceed 25 percent of a backyard's area. The garage addition cannot exceed 1,125 sq. ft. in area. The requested addition meets both of these criteria. A CUP is needed because the addition, in conjunction with the existing garage, Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 7 exceeds the allowed 864 sq. ft. Staff is recommending the approval of Planning Commission resolution No 541-98, a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Thomas Lammi, allowing a 1,246 sq. ft. oversized garage at 7858 Long Lake road, with stipulations. The stipulations were listed as follows: 1. The conditional use permit shall be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of City Council approval, and a receipt of such recording shall be provided to the City of Mounds View. 2. The garage shall be designed and maintained to provide a seamless and uniform building appearance with the existing garage and house. 3. The garage shall not be used for living space or other uses not allowed by the district in which it is located or by the Zoning Code. Should the use change for which the permit was granted,the conditional use permit shall become null and void. 4. No other sheds or accessory buildings shall be allowed on this lot. 5. There shall be no vehicle access door on the west elevation of the addition. Vehicle ingress/egress shall only be possible through the existing garage. 6. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure a high quality of workmanship and timely completion of the development. Chairperson Peterson asked the applicant to make his presentation. Mr.Lammi told the Commission the addition would match the existing structure in all materials, including shingles. Commissioner Obert asked staff if stipulation No. 3 would protect the City from the applicant running a business out of the garage. Associate Ericson stated stipulation No. 3, would cover the possibility of the applicant using the garage for some type of business. Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Obert to approve resolution No. 541-98, a resolution recommending the City Council approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow an oversized garage for Thomas Lammi, 7858 Long Lake Road; Mounds View Planning Case No. 516-98, with stipulations. Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 8 Ayes-7 Nays - 0 The motion carried. Chairperson Peterson told the applicant the case would be passed on to the City Council for their review on April 27, 1998. 9. Planning Case No 507-97 2625 Highway 10, 7715 -7761 Eastwood Road Applicant: TOLD Development Company Consideration of Resolution Nos. 536-98 and 538-98 Denying the Walgreen's Development Request, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning Requests The applicant, TOLD Development Company, was present. Associate Ericson stated that Planning Case No. 507-97 was back before the Planning Commission for reconsideration of a motion that had been made at the April 1, 1998 Planning Commission regular meeting. The motion to deny recommending approval by the City Council of Resolution Nos. 536-98 and 538-98 had not been voted on because the wording of the resolutions did not meet with the Planning Commission's approval. Updated versions of each resolution were submitted for the Planning Commission's consideration. Final action on the proposal would need to be taken by May 29, 1998. Letters of support from three of the neighboring property owners were presented to the Planning Commission as new information in the case. Chairperson Peterson clarified the fact that at the last meeting Commissioner Brasaemle had withdrawn his motion and no action was taken. He asked the applicant if he(TOLD) had any new information to present in the case. Bob Cunningham,TOLD Development Company, asked the Planning Commission to pass the case on to the City Council so that he might have an opportunity to address them on the case. He also asked, as a stipulation of approving the Development Plan,that the developer be required to get MnDOT approval for the Highway 10 access into the site. This would lift the burden of overriding a MnDOT decision off of the City's shoulders. Commissioner Obert asked the applicant if this action meant that the development would Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 9 continue without the Highway 10 access. Mr. Cunningham concurred. He added there are currently two adjacent property owners that have not reached some type of settlement with the developer on behalf of Walgreens. Carol Arel, 7750 Greenwood Drive, made the following statement: "I've prepared some remarks. So I would appreciate not being interrupted and just allowed to say what I have to say. As you all know I have stood up at many of these meeting before,along with other residents of Mounds View. And, although,I maybe only one of the few residents you hear from tonight,I'm asking you to consider many other Mounds View residents that are not here tonight. The residents that I'm asking you to consider are the residents that are unaware of the plans being made to change the Comprehensive Plan prior to completion of public hearings on the plan. There are residents who have not had their awareness raised to this issue as of yet, due to the continuing nature of the talks on the Comprehensive Plan. I'm asking the Planning Commission to follow the path that you began to lay out at the meeting two weeks ago, which is to pass a recommendation denying the changes to the Comprehensive Plan. I ask that you don't let an unfortunate situation of the two week delay due to an inadequately prepared denial proposal stop you from, what I believe you saw,as the right course of action two weeks ago. The City of Mounds View, and the Planning Commission in particular, have heard what the residents of the City are asking you to do as officials of the City in connection with the Comprehensive plan, and these were at prior meetings of the Comprehensive--the Comprehensive Plan meetings. And that is not to zone commercial property next to R-1 residential property. This is a community issue setting a dangerous precedent, in my opinion. And it is not just a personal issue to the adjacent property owners. rm standing before you as a concerned member of the community, who has refused thus far, to be pressured into a last-minute agreement with the developer. Because I still believe that community and the good of the people in the community should come first. I, for one, want to teach my children that they can still grow up in a society where people think of each other, not in a society where the "me first attitude", expressed in prior meetings, is the norm. I want my kids to know that if they elect responsible officials, and work within the processes with those officials, it's likely that a reasonable resolution will be reached. And since Mr. Cunningham has brought up the agreements, I'd like to specifically refer to a couple of things connected to the agreements: Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 10 The agreement that is proposed by the developer names the City of Mounds View under the "Hold Harmless Clause" of the agreement. I personally am concerned that my City Council, as my elected representatives,have not been given the opportunity to review an agreement in which they are named prior to signatures being obtained from residents. City government, in my opinion, is a difficult job already, as you all can attest to. In carrying out the best interests of the City, I think, it's more difficult if they do not have all of the information available to them for consideration. Additionally, I'd like the Planning Commission to know that this agreement was presented to us, personally, less than two days ago. We were first contacted over Easter weekend on Good Friday when we were out of town, and we did not see a copy of the agreement until Monday night. We have been, in my opinion, pressured to sign an agreement that strips away all of our rights, as a citizen in Mounds View connected to this project, and we have been pressured to respond prior to this meeting. Only in discussions last night, when we indicated we felt pressure, were we given some additional time to consider. For an agreement of this importance, less than two days time to secure legal counsel and advise and negotiate an extremely broad and open-ended agreement, is not an example of good- faith negotiations with the residents of Mounds View. Lastly,I want the Commission to know that while a few residents may have agreed to be compensated financially,the issues of traffic, safety, potential drop in property values, potential water problems,and the issue of the right type of commercial development for Mounds View, would, by that I mean, services which would truly benefit the residents in more than just tax base, still remain. In fact, some new information we received last night would indicate that the developer is no longer willing to work with the City and the residents on traffic issues on Greenwood connected to this project. It was indicated to us last night, that the developer views traffic and safety issues as the City's problem and not theirs. I know I personally have not heard any acceptable solutions to address these concerns, or the concerns over the in-out access on Highway 10. And I respectfully ask the Commission to pass a motion recommending denial of this project to the City Council in the best interests of the residents of Mounds View. Thank you for listening to me." Mr.Pinkerton agreed with the statements that Ms. Arel made and added, "If I was the developer I would have removed the access on Highway 10 at this point and he has not done that. That's a very major safety issue, we have our deceleration right in the middle of his right-out acceleration lane,as our property is right next door." MnDOT has indicated that they hope the project does not go forward because it is a dangerous situation. There are also stacking issues from County Road I that need to be addressed. John Weins, 7760 Greenwood Drive, spoke in opposition to the Walgreen development. Chairperson Peterson asked the developer if, as stated by Ms. Arel, their stance on traffic Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 11 control measures for Greenwood Drive had changed. Mr. Cunningham stated their concern is that they address all traffic safety issues to the best of their ability. Ms.Arel,quoted Terry Moses, the real estate representative for TOLD Development,as saying, "Traffic issues on Greenwood Drive are the responsibility of the City and the citizens." Terry Moses,Prudential Commercial Reality, stated, "that's not what I conveyed." He told the Commission that as far as he knows the developer's position has not changed in regards to traffic safety concerns on Greenwood Drive. Chairperson Peterson told the Commission that an action, one way or another, needed to be taken on the Case that evening so the Case could move forward to the City Council for its consideration. A written recommendation, showing the Findings of Fact, needs to be sent to the City Council. Motion/Second: Brooks/Johnston to approve denial of Resolution No. 536-98, a resolution recommending the City Council approve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low Density and High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial for properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715 -7761 Eastwood Road; Planning Case No. 507-97. Ayes -3 Nays -4 The motion failed. Motion/Second: Peterson/Obert to approve Resolution No. 536-98, a resolution recommending the City Council approve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low Density and High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial for properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715 - 7761 Eastwood Road;Planning Case No. 507-97, as amended that the Highway 10 access is not a necessary part of the development project, language of the final resolution to be drafted by staff. Ayes -4 Nays - 3 The motion carried. Ms.Arel stated: "This is a--you're looking at an overall big picture. What you're proposing to do is piecemeal, overall big picture, and I guess I have to disagree with that again as being in the best interest of the City." Chairperson Peterson stated the feedback gathered from the community forums indicates the residents want the Highway 10 corridor to be the main area of commercial Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 12 development. The support for keeping commercial development on Highway 10 is overwhelming and the buffering issues for this development are undecided. Commissioner Brasaemle made a statement in explanation of his change in view for the project. He stated the fact that the developer has settled with four out of the six adjacent property owners and the developer's willingness to abide by a MnDOT decision, one way or another, on the Highway 10 access. Motion/Second: Obert/Peterson to approve Resolution No. 538-98, a resolution recommending the City Council approve Ordinance 614, an Ordinance approving the rezoning of properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715 -7761 Eastwood Road from R-3, Medium Density Residential,and R-1, Single-Family Residential,to B-2,Limited Business District;Planning Case No. 507-97. Ayes -4 Nays - 3 The motion carried. Mr.Pinkerton asked the Commission how he was going to get compensated for having an 18'wall with high-intensity lights built behind his town home development. He said he felt like the rug was being pulled out from under his development half way through its completion. Commissioner Obert thanked the citizens for their participation in the process. Ms.Arel expressed her"disappointment in the fact the Planning Commission, while rightfully so, bends over backwards to treat the developers fairly. I find that it was extremely unfortunate that both sets of proposals were not available two weeks ago, and basically, that left the residents in a position where they got caught off guard." A ten-minute recess was taken at 8:40 p.m. Back on the record at 8:50 p.m. 10. Planning Case No 514-98 8400 Coral Sea Street Applicant: Bridges Leasing Company, LLC Consideration of Resolution No 542-98 Approving the Development Review for Completion of the 2nd Phase of Bridges Technology Building Project Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 13 The applicant,Bridges Leasing Company, LLC, was present. Associate Ericson gave his presentation as follows: Bridges Leasing Company,LLC, is applying for permission to expand its current facility by building a 35,188 sq. ft. office/warehouse facility. This expansion will bring the total build-out to 64,376 sq. ft. The parcel of land, currently zoned I-1, Industrial District, is undeveloped with the western edge of the property in wetland, and the remaining area covered by dense tree cover. The proposed expansion will match the design and style of the existing building. Two areas of concern were addressed at the Planning Commission meeting held April 1, 1998. One being parking requirements. The second being the closeness of the paved parking lot to the adjacent wetland. The applicant has provided a master plan showing how the required parking numbers can be met. A proof of parking for 38 stalls was indicated on the site plan. This will require either a variance or a conditional use permit. The parking issue can be resolved after approval or denial of the application is achieved. The paved parking area has been modified, as suggested by the Commission at the April 1, 1998, meeting to show the closest point to the wetland as being ten feet. Because work is being done within 100 feet of a wetland, the applicant will be required to have a wetland buffer permit approved by the City. The revised site plan showed the 100- foot wetland buffer,the edge of the easement area, and statistics regarding the area of the buffer and the percent of which is covered in pervious and impervious surface. An ordinance vacating the drainage and utility easements between Lots 2 and 3 was drafted by the City Attorney and presented to the Commission. An easement document that will dedicate to the City a drainage and utility easement over the delineated wetland area is being prepared by the City Attorney. Staff is recommending approval of Resolution 542-98, a resolution recommending approval to the City Council of a development review for the Bridges Technology Park Phase II expansion, with stipulations. Stipulations were listed as follows: 1. Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall accomplish the following: a. Obtain a Rice Creek Watershed District permit(has been met). Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 14 b. Enter into a development agreement with the City. c. Coordinate with City staff to resolve the parking requirement inconsistency either by obtaining a variance or conditional use permit for the reduced parking ratios. d. Arrange to combine Lots 2 and 3,Block 1 of the North Star Industrial Park 2nd Addition with Ramsey County and provide proof of such application to the City. e. Arrange to have recorded with Ramsey County the drainage and utility easement document for the wetland area as indicated on the revised site plan dated 4/8/98, and provide proof of such recordation to the City. 2. Approval of this development review shall be contingent upon the adoption of Ordinance 615, and ordinance vacating a portion of a drainage and utility easement over and across Lots 2 and 3. Chairperson Peterson asked the applicant to make their presentation. Grady Kinghorn,Bridges Leasing Company,LLC, declined to make a presentation but offered to answer any questions that staff or the Commission had. Motion/Second: Stevenson/Brasaemle to approve Resolution No. 542-98, a resolution recommending approval by the City Council of a Development Review for the expansion of the Bridges Technology Park, 8400 Coral Sea Street; Planning Case No. 514-98, with stipulations. Ayes- 6 Nays -0 The motion carried. Associate Ericson recommended that the applicant return to the next Planning Commission meeting to apply for the variance or conditional use permit to allow for the parking ratios as shown on the site plan. Commissioner Stevenson suggested having more facts present in regards to the shared parking with Phase I of the project. 11. Planning Case No. 517-98 2430 Highway 10 (O'Neil Property) Applicant: AP Mounds View Limited Partnership (Anthony Properties) Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 15 Consideration of Resolution No. 544-98 Approving the Development Review Stage of the PUD, Preliminary Plat and a Wetland Buffer Permit. The applicant, AP Mounds View Limited Partnership (Anthony Properties), was present. Planning Director Jopke gave his presentation as follows: The Planning Commission reviewed this item on April 1, 1998 and made several recommendations and changes that needed to be shown as part of the site plan made available at this meeting. Full public notice was provide for this meeting. The application was accepted March 17, 1998. The 60-day approval period expires on May 17, 1998, unless extended. The site is located at 2430 Highway 10 and is bound by Long Lake Road and County Road H2. The property is owned by the O'Neil family and is under contract for purchase and development by Anthony Properties Management. The developer is proposing to construct a 63,000 sq. ft., 15 screen, 2188-seat movie theater, three 10,000 sq. ft. one-story office buildings, a 5000 sq. ft. restaurant, and a 6400 sq. ft. retail building. the movie theater would be operated by Carmike Theaters. Parking for a total of 776 cars was provided on the site. Joint use of the theater and office parking is indicated because of offsetting hours. On May 12, 1997 the City Council approved Resolution 5104, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Ordinance No. 598, a rezoning, and Resolution 5119, approval of the General Concept PUD Plan for the site. Plan changes made to the original PUD General Concept plan were also reviewed. Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 544-98 recommending City Council approve a PUD development stage plan with stipulations for the Anthony Properties/O'Neil development at 2430 Highway 10. Stipulations were listed as follows: 1. That the landscape plan should be amended to incorporate the changes suggested by the City forester in his 3/31/98 memorandum. 2. That the site plan be amended to incorporate the changes suggested by SEH in the memorandum dated 3/31/98 and the comments from the Fire Marshal. 3. The drainage/utility plan should be amended to eliminate the City storm sewer Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 16 system on the property as per the memorandum from Rocky Keehn dated 4/13/98. 4. The light standards on the theater portion of the site should not exceed 24' in height. 5. Preliminary and final plats in accordance with Title 1200,the subdivision regulations, of the Mounds view Municipal Code must be approved by the City prior to the issuance of permits for more than one building site. 6. City approval of a wetland buffer permit in accordance with Title 1300, the flood plain and water management regulations, of the Mounds View Municipal Code. 7. Approval of the required permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District. 8. Approval of the permits from MnDOT for the accesses onto Highway 10. Director Jopke also mentioned he had received a call from a Mr. Welsh, 2558 Mounds View Drive, who indicated he favored the Anthony Properties development as well as the ring road connection. Chairperson Peterson asked the applicant to make his presentation. Wendell Smith, representing Anthony Properties, gave his presentation as follows: A brief overview of the project was given which restated the facts and details as presented by Mr. Jopke. Changes to the original General Concept PUD Plan were reviewed. There was a building finish presentation as well as architectural elevations of the theater and office space exteriors. In response to the list of stipulations,Mr. Wendell responded as follows: 1. The developer will comply with the City Forester's requests. 2. The developer will comply with the changes suggested by SEH. 3. The City storm sewer will be eliminated from the plan as recommended by Mr. Keehn. 4. The developer would like to intermix the 40' standards, as shown on the plan, with some 24' standards. The 40' standards (a total of 6) give off more light and require fewer standards. The 24' standards would be used on the south side of the site, by the office building, which is also closest to the residential areas. 5. The developer will comply with Title 1200. Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 17 6. The developer will comply with Title 1300. 7. Compliance with the Rice Creek Watershed District is in process and information will be supplied when available. 8. There is a letter from MnDOT, dated November 27, 1997, that approved the signal and the intersection, subject to financing. There have been three residential homes purchased by Anthony Properties on County Road 112. One of the homes has been re-sold and the property value did not decrease in the least. Motion/Second: Stevenson/Miller to approve Resolution 544-98, a resolution recommending the City Council approve a PUD development stage plan, for commercial uses on the O'Neil property, 2430 Highway 10;Planning Case No. 517-98, with stipulations, and amended, either/or, that the light standards on the theater portion of the site should not exceed 24' or prior to bringing the plans to the City Council, a study must be done insuring that the lights on the standards in the parking lot are not visible along direct sight lines from south of County Road 1-12. Ayes-6 Nays - 0 The motion carried. Commissioner Johnston suggested that No. 3, Allowed Uses, in the PUD document, should give the development the flexibility of having a restaurant and/or a retail development;this statement should be built into the agreement. The word "retail" in this portion of the document should read "retail/restaurant". The Commission agreed unanimously. 12. Staff Reports/Information Items Associate Ericson told the Commission that he would be representing the City in court on April 16, 1998 in regards to the property located at 8217 Long Lake Road, the Larry Wolfgram property. This property has had several Nuisance Code violations. Director Jopke told the Commission he had attended the national American Planning Association Conference, held in Boston Mass. Information from the conference was made available to any interested parties. 13. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners' Reports No reports were considered. Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 18 14. Adjournment to Agenda Meeting There being no further business before the Special meeting of the Planning Commission, Chairperson Peterson adjourned the meeting at 10:45 p.m. (The Special Meeting immediately adjourned to the Agenda Session). Respectfully submitted, Rick Jopke Community Development Director 56 MOUNDS VIEW PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Thursday, February 26, 1998 City Hall, 6:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Silvis called the meeting to order. ROLL CALL: All Commission members were present including Chair Silvis, Commissioners Dentz, Starr, Long, Stevenson, MacDonald, and Benz. Also present was Councilmember Gunn and Director Saarion. MINUTES: Motion was made by Commissioner Dentz and seconded by Commissioner Stevenson to approve the minutes of January 22, 1998. Motion passed unanimously. MEMBER INTRODUCTION: Chair Silvis introduced new Parks and Recreation Commissioner Mary Benz. UPDATES: Director Saarion informed the Commission that the City Council had adopted a resolution as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission to approve the Rice Creek North Regional Trail master plan. The resolution has been • signed and sent off to Ramsey County. Director Saarion reported that the Mayors and Managers and School Board of the District had meet to discuss athletic facilities. The joint tournament complex idea was tabled because of cost and lack of available land. Direction was given to go out and plan ways of altering, improving and sharing athletic facilities to accommodate the needs of the district. Parks and Recreation Directors and School District will be meeting every month to create a plan including proposals for facility improvements, continued needs assessment, scheduling strategies and partnerships with youth athletic associations. Community Center bids will be opened next week. The City Council has requested the presence of Community Center Task Force members at the Work Session, Monday, March 2. Bid information will be presented by architects. Director Saarion informed the Commission that the grant application for the LCMR grant for purchase of wetland and mitigation of area of Community Center property for parking, including storm water ponding for runoff was handed in-word to be received in May whether grant is accepted or not. PROGRAM REPS: Commissioners were given program areas which they are to represent in regards to citizen input, suggestions, ideas and ways for improvement. It is hoped that Commissioners will provide that important link between resident participant and staff Commissioners were assigned areas of programming which they are either affiliated already with or have skills and interests in that particular area. See Assignments attached. SUMMER PLAYGROUNDS: Staff requested input from the Commission regarding the format of Summer Playground programs. Safety Camp is being planned this year after a summer without it. After discussion Commission provided direction that Safety Camp should be held during the middle of Summer Playground programs - as part of the programs so that there would not be a need for additional fees, and in an effort to get as many youth to participate as possible. Safety Camp was directed to be held the week of July 13 - 16 with Friday as a trips day. Commission wanted the Summer Playground program to be a low fee as possible because it is a subsidized program intended to benefit all youth in the summer regardless of economic status. • Commissioners also expressed concern about the high cost of youth trips and requested staff to program less costly trips. Director Saarion concurred that trips are expensive-the highest cost typically bus • transportation. ADULT MEN'S SOFTBALL RULES: Director Saarion discussed the home run rule and requested Commissioners' thoughts on the options. The intention is to reduce the amount of home runs hit over field fences. As softball equipment becomes more technical, the ability for home runs increases. When the wind blows the right direction at Silver View and City Hall Parks, balls hit high and long have the tendency to drift out of the field. The idea is to make a league rule that discourages home run hitting. After considering many options for the home run rule, Commissioner Long made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Starr to adopt the home run rule which allows 2 hitters in Class C and 1 hitter in Class D to be designated home run hitters- determined by the first players to hit home runs during a given game. All other home runs are declared a foul ball-home run on the fourth foul ball would be an out Motion passed unanimously. ENTERTAINMENT IN THE PARK: Director Saarion announced a new program -Entertainment in the Park- which is possible because of donations by Medtronic and Irondale Hockey Association. Four Sunday evenings of musical entertainment is planned during the month of June at Lakeside Park. SWIMMING: The Aquatics program is changing to a Ellis& Associates curriculum which provides more flexibility in training and licensing lifeguards and swimming instructors. In addition, the curriculum is more user friendly rather than competitor skills (more similar to YMCA swimming lessons). In addition, Ellis & Associates provides training assistance, lifeguard and swimming staff evaluations and on-going training. The switch over to this new aquatics program will begin this Summer. Lifeguards and Swimming Instructors will be trained in the new technologies of lifesaving and new curriculum of the Learn to Swim program this Spring. PLAYLOT REQUEST: Director Saarion reported that the Manager of Woodlawn Estates Apartment complex visited her office and suggested that the empty lot on Woodlawn Drive be groomed for a playlot for children of the apartments. Staff checked into the status of the two lots and found that both were tax forfeited properties. The size could accommodate a very small soccer field and/or a small overlapping ball field. The lots require clean-up, mowing, fill and seeding. The play space would be next to a street, but it was suggested that bushes could be planted along the roadway to hinder children from running into the street-or could be fenced. After discussion, Commissioner Starr made a motion seconded by Commissioner Long to recommend to the City Council declaration of these two parcels of tax forfeited property as parkland-to be improved for a grassy playlot Motion passed unanimously. Staff will provide further information to the City Council regarding costs and labor for improvements and will present this information at the April Work Session. PARK IMPROVEMENTS: Hillview Park hockey boards are very old. Planks and hardware has been replaced numerous times with a result being that the facility looks unsightly. The court is paved for multiple use both as a hockey rink during winter as well as rollerblade hockey rink and basketball court during Spring, Summer and Fall. The function of the facility is very good-but there is a need to replace the hockey boards. Approximate cost is $10,000. Staff requested Commissioner's thoughts on this proposal. In addition, Staff reminded Commissioners about the need for additional netting at Greenfield Park baseball field to decrease the number of foul balls landing on the parking lot, damaging cars and potentially hitting and hurting people in the park. (Commissioners recalled the visit to the park last summer when Councilmember Gunn's car was hit and dented with one of 7 foul balls hit in a matter of minutes into the parking lot). Director Saarion reported that she had requested participation of funding from the Irondale Baseball League. There reply was that they did not have capital funding and that the Board felt that it was the responsibility of the City to provide adequate facilities in the parks to safeguard both players and spectators. Commissioners discussed this issue. Motion was made by Chair Silvis and seconded by Commissioner Long to recommend park improvements to the City Council including new hockey boards at Hillview and additional netting at Greenfield Park baseball field using Park Dedication Funds, not to exceed$18,000 for the two projects. Motion passed unanimously. Director Saarion will elicit project costs for these two projects and request approval by City Council at the April Work Session. COMMISSION GOALS: Because the lateness of the hour, this topic was tabled until next meeting. Staff will provide Park Capital Replacement schedule for new Commission members -to be distributed at the next meeting. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Chair Silvis and seconded by Commissioner Long to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed unanimously. Sc Item No. Type of Business: CA WK:Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Cari Schmidt Item Title/Subject: License Application for Festival Committee Beer Garden Date of Report: May 20, 1998 The Festival Committee has submitted their application for the Temporary 3.2% Malt Liquor Special Event/Festival In the Park License. They have acquired the requisite insurance and provided a diagram of the layout for the beer garden. (See attached) Staff Recommendation: As all of the requirements for temporary license have been met, staff recommends approval of the temporary license for the 3.2 Malt Liquor License to the Festival In the Park Committee. lino HA Ocia b° 0 a C ig Q 0 x a �� H U 0 0 � 0 0 z 0 U E' ez W U O td '" tv 0 o U c .. . . . s . • • • • • ;. cts Z U • = = 0 © .mow • C7 •• D D •D • .fl En • 000 • ,mac, 0 • a) a) a) • — P p • -c3 ;. b a)m t4 2 •�• °° ( w •• ✓ E 375 o W �. • 4 ' .fl = o w p a ri e� •• �, '., _ a) a) a� •• p fly O c c ° .° ct• • 0v) .1:3 .0 • • • • • • • • • • •• 0 8No w ) • 'C03 c4 O �-" 'HQw L7Z • � b o, 6 H ›, N O co)» co OU 0 t)• y..1 S-1 rq .V".' -o O ..,9 O r`;,) a, rq 'G � C) o _0 N -8 N O g D 0.) ° ^d a) �=•, = ,4; -� C .ct a) .0o o z u, v) " ° ) .4ce N 0 . , _0 o A i - cr ° o y � 03c 0 — !. b o• x 0 rr' . v 0 t -° O • H / 8 F' C/) o a) in- c1) r:4 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ O }VAD CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2401 HIGHWAY 10 „ MOUNDS VIEW, MN 55112 'a71 ilayu-Paan ', LICENSE APPUCATIOI4 TEMPORARY LIQUOR LICENSE Type of Application: Temporary Intoxicating Liquor Special Event Temporary 3.2 Malt Liquor A Temporary 3.2 Matt Liquor Special EventiFrtival In the Park Location of Event: 5394 Edgewood Drive(Bel Rae Facility) 8290 Coral Sea Street("'The Bridges Golf Course) 2401 Highway Ten(City Hall Park) Date of Event: (max. Of 3 days/2 days for Festival in the Park) 1J14 92 Date of Application: 5)1 a)qs2 on I R(0-4(4 c Name of Applicant: C Ke, • t 0 -. t Name of Business: 1'1 ounci .)U Pu_c) cQ un I J Dm Address of Business: Qs 9 `<h 0 l 1 -Dirt u-e. Nounck 0) eL / ncYA .55) ) Dos the applicant have a liquor license from the City of Mounds View? Yes X No If yes, please list the business name on the license: If no, please listthe Gly in which a liquor license or cram permit is held? Please list the business name on the license: Have your ever had a license revoked? LX) If yes, attach explanation, PLEASE SUBMIT EVIDENCE OF THE F011OWING: a. $100,000 bodily injury for each person: b. $200,000 each common cause; c. $100,000 Property damage each common cause: d. $100,000 Loss of Means of Support e. $200,000 Each Common cause; f. $300.000 Annual Aggregate Any policy or insurance pool providing coverage, the Crty shall be named as an additional insured. I hereby certify that information provided on this application is true and hereby correct and understand any misrepresentation made herebybymay be ground for denial of this application �'�� Applicant's Full Name: ,.iy/1l`�7 re✓(�i1 1,e,2 Date of Birth: 4 / %g J/`/7 (Issue OAT!(NM r JL/YY) CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE 412887 I D 5/13/98 PRODuGEA i THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION K & K Insurance Group , I n c . I ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE 1712 Magnavox Way • HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. P.O. Box 2338 Fort Wayne , In 46801 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE INSJRED I — COMPANYATIG INSURANCE COMPANY MOUNDS VIEW FESTIVAL, INC. LETTER rt 2319 KNOLL DRIVE COMPANY 8 MOUNDS VIEW, MN 55112 LETTER COMPANY i LETTER COVERAGES THIS IS To CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES Of INSURANCE USTED Bt.OW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD IN- DICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECTTD WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN.THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POUCtES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE SEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. . CO' TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION ' UMITS(in thousands) . LTR DATE(MMiDD/Y1) DATE(MMrDO/YY) General Liability 1 12 :01 AM I 12 : 01 AM General Aggregate Is N ATT F. A E Commercial General Liability T7 3796679500 7/ 10/98 7/13/9 8 Prod,cls-Comproas Aggngue !S 10110 ❑Claims Made E Occur. 'Personsl&Advertising Injury $ 10 0 0 ❑Owner's&Contractors Prat. ^Each Occurrence $ 100 0 , ip$2 5 0 PD DED. Rre Damage(Ary ate tire) $ 300 M.dbal E:merae(Aro one person) S ct. . I , 1 Participant Leal Liability ilS WONT Automobile Liability I CombinedI Siigu ❑Any auto \ Linn $ ❑All owned autos Bodily INIH CI Seheouieo autos person) S ❑Hired autos ° M i MO ❑Non-owned autos (per sooting $ El Garage Liability Property Damns $ Excess Liability am Occurrence 0 Other than Umbrella form S $ ry Warners' Compensation St and IS EaEach ch Aocidertt� _' U IIIty ; Disease—Polio/limit S Disease-Each Employee AD&D $ Participant Pnrnary Medical S Ambient 1 Excess Medical S IWeedy Indemnity S X DESCRIPTiOM or orenciaN3ttOCASIDWSrVHr1iCLEtrnfiThiet'IOedtsreCnAL ITEMS CERT HOLDER IS ADDITIONAL INSURED: CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW (CG2024) RE: MOUNDS VIEW FESTIVAL DATES: JULY 11-12 1998 LOCATION.: MOUNDS VIEW MN LIQUOR LIABILITY: $1 ,000,000 OCCCRRENCE, $2,000.000 AGGREGATE CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION CITY 0 F MOUNDS VIEW SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL —DAYS 1 WRTT TEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO i OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY. I ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORS AEPRESENtomE SL 39 1.92 1 Item No. 7A Staff Report No. Meeting Date: Type of Business: WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: James Ericson, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing and Introduction (First Reading) of Ordinance 617, an Ordinance Amending Title 1100, Chapters 1114 and 1115 of the Municipal Zoning Code Relating to Permitted Uses within the B-3, Business Commercial, and B-4, Regional Business Zoning Districts. Date of Report: May 22, 1998 Background: The Mounds View Community Center and the Mermaid Entertainment Complex are both located in B-3, Highway Business zoning districts. At present, community centers and bowling alleys are not listed as permitted or conditional uses in this district. The Planning Commission, at their meeting on May 6, 1998, voted to recommend approval of a code amendment that would allow both the Community Center and the Mermaid as permitted uses within the B-3 district. The City Council, on May 11, 1998, approved Resolution 5236 which approved a development review for the Mermaid to expand their bowling operation with the stipulation that the zoning inconsistency be resolved. The City Attorney has drafted an ordinance to resolve both inconsistencies. Discussion: With regard to the Community Center, a code amendment is required prior to the issuance of any occupancy permits for the building under construction/renovation on the site of the former Bel Rae Ballroom. Because this type of use is not listed as a use in any district, a rezoning of the property to a different zoning designation would not resolve the inconsistency. Therefore, amending the code by adding"Community Centers" as an allowed use within the B-3 zoning district would seem to be the most logical course of action. Related to the Mermaid, the zoning inconsistency came to light in conjunction with their request to expand the bowling operation. The zoning for the site is B-3, Business Commercial, which does not allow a bowling alley as a permitted or conditional use. It is not until the B-4, Regional Business district, that bowling alleys become an allowed use. Based upon other allowed uses within this district, such as amusement centers, hotels, restaurants and bars, and commercial recreation uses, all of which describe(or potentially describe)the Mermaid facility, staff and the Planning Commission contend that a B-3 designation would be appropriate. Ordinance 617 Staff Report May 22, 1998 Page 2 Recommendation: While there are multiple alternatives for dealing with the zoning inconsistencies, staff and the Planning Commission recommend that community centers and bowling alleys be allowed as permitted uses within the B-3, Highway Business zoning district, and as such, recommend that the Council move to introduce the first reading of Ordinance 617. James Ericson, Planning Associate N:\data\groups\comdev\specproj\sp062.98\amendmnt.rpt ORDINANCE NO. 617 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 1100, CHAPTERS 1114 AND 1115 OF THE MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE RELATING TO PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE B-3, BUSINESS COMMERCIAL, AND B-4, REGIONAL BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICTS THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: Section 1. Title 1114.02 of the Mounds View Municipal code shall be amended by inserting the underlined and italicized language, to read as follows: 1114.02: PERMITTED USES: The following uses are permitted in a B-3 District: All permitted uses as allowed in a B-2 Limited Business District. Amusement centers. Auto accessory stores. Bowling alleys. Commercial recreational uses. Grocery stores, supermarkets. Motels, motor hotels and hotels; provided, that the lot area contains not less than five hundred (500) square feet of lot area per unit. Private clubs or lodges serving food and beverages with use restricted to members and their guests. adequate dining room, kitchen and bar space must be provided according to standards imposed upon similar unrestricted customer operations. The serving of alcoholic beverages to members and their guests shall be allowed; provided, that such service is in compliance with applicable Federal, State, and Municipal regulations'. Offices of such use shall be limited to no more than twenty percent (20%) of the gross floor area of the building. ' See Chapters 501, 502, and 503 of this Code; see M.S.A. Chapter 340A. Ordinance 617 Page2 Public or semi-public recreational buildings and neighborhood or commercial centers. public and private educational institutions limited to elementary.junior high and senior high schools and religious institutions, such as churches. chapel. temples and synagogues. Rental stores. Restaurants, cafes, tea rooms, taverns, on- and off-sale liquor. Taxi terminals, stands and offices. SECTION 2. Title 1115.02 of the Mounds View Municipal code shall be amended by deleting the italicized lined-thru language, to read as follows: 1115.02 PERMITTED USES: The following are permitted uses in a B-4 District: All permitted uses as allowed in a B-3 District. Amusement places (such as dance halls or roller rinks). Enclosed boat and marine sales. Bowling alleys. Department and discount stores. Dry cleaning, including plant accessory heretofore, pressing and repairing. Electrical appliance stores, including incidental repair and assembly but not fabricating or manufacturing. Furniture stores. Garden supply stores. Public garage. Theaters, not of the outdoor drive-in type. Variety stores, 5 and 10 cent stores and stores of similar nature. (Ord. 452, 2-27-89) Ordinance 617 Page3 SECTION 3. This ordinance takes effect 30 days after its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View the day of , 1998. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1998. Duane McCarty, Mayor Charles S. Whiting, City Clerk/Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: Robert C. Long, City Attorney N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\PLANCOMM\ORD617.ORD 7G RESOLUTION NO. 5240 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION DETERMINING THE PETITION FOR INITIATIVE TO BE INSUFFICIENT WHEREAS, a petition proposing to adopt a resolution by initiative regarding the theater project("Petition") has been submitted to the City Clerk-Administrator pursuant to Chapter 5 of the Mounds View City Charter; and WHEREAS, Section 5.03 requires the City Clerk-Administrator to examine the Petition as to its sufficiency and report to the Council within 10 days of receipt of the Petition; and WHEREAS,the City Clerk-Administrator has submitted his report to the Council on May 20. 1998 within 10 days as required by Section 5.03 of the City Charter; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council is required by Section 5.03 to determine the sufficiency of the Petition by resolution: and WHEREAS, the recommendations of the City Clerk-Administrator and the City Attorney are that the Petition is insufficient and irregular for the reasons stated in the May 20 City Clerk- Administrator report and the City Attorney's legal opinion. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council, pursuant to Section 5.03 of the Mounds View City Charter. determines the Petition for initiative is insufficient and irregular based upon the recommendations and legal advice of the City Clerk- Administrator and the City Attorney: and be it FURTHER RESOLVED that based on this finding of insufficiency of the Petition, the initiative for a resolution requested by the Petition committee shall not be placed on a ballot of either a special election or a regular City election. Adopted this 26th day of May, 1998. Duane McCarty, Mayor ATTEST: Charles S. Whiting City Clerk-Administrator �G Resolution No. 5239 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW County of Ramsey State of Minnesota A resolution setting forth a tentative timetable for preparing and adopting the 1999 budget and long term financial plan. WHEREAS, the City's Charter and Code, as well as State Statutes set forth various requirements for considering and adopting the City's budget; and WHEREAS, Section 7.04 of the City Charter requires the City Clerk-Administrator to submit to the Council a budget calendar to be established by resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota that the following budget and long term financial plan calendar is hereby adopted: May 26 City Council adopts budget calendar. By June 22 Departments submit proposed 1999 budget&LTFP to Finance. June 22 -July 10 Finance Dept. and City Administrator review budgets & LTFP. July 13 - 31 Dept. heads review budgets & LTFP. August 3 - Sept 14 Council review of budget and LTFP: August 3rd work session August 10th 4:30 to 6:30 p.m. August 31st special work session September 8 work session September 14 Council adopts preliminary budget and maximum levy. Sept 14 - Oct 5 Additional Council meetings as needed. October 30 City distributes budget newsletter. November 2 Council holds informational meeting on the 1999 budget& LTFP. November 30 to Truth in taxation hearing and adoption of 1999 budget,tax levy and December 20 LTFP (dates dependent upon County & School District selected dates). Adopted this 26th day of May, 1998. Duane McCarty, Mayor ATTEST: Charles Whiting, City Clerk-Administrator (SEAL) City of Mounds View City Council and Staff Retreat May 18, 1998 L INTRODUCTION The Mayor, City Council, City Administrator, and Department Heads held a Council/Staff retreat on May 18, 1998. The retreat, held at the Harriet Alexander Interpretive Nature Center, was held as a workshop to address some current issues/problems being faced by the participants. Participants at the retreat were: Duane McCarty Mayor Gary Quick Council Member Roger Stigney Council Member Roger Koopmeiners Council Member Sherry Gunn Council Member Chuck Whiting City Administrator Tim Ramacher Chief of Police Mary Saarion Director of Parks and Recreation Mike Ulrich Director of Public Works Rick Jopke Director of Community Development Bruce Kessel Director of Finance John Hammerschmidt Golf Course Superintendent Can Schmidt Assistant to the City Administrator The primary objectives of the retreat were: 1) To determine if this organization is viewed as credible-why or why not? And if so, where are our credibility issues--to the citizenry, between Council Members, between staff and Council? 2) To determine how to keep up to speed with what the community wants for Mounds View? 3) To determine the best possible methods for the dissemination of information to the citizens and to Council. 4) To create understanding from which appropriate action will follow. IL INTRODUCTORY REMARKS City Administrator Chuck Whiting welcomed participants to the retreat pointing out the importance of good communication and teamwork between elected officials and city staff He expressed some concern about comments that were made after the last retreat about how"we did a lot of talking--but not a lot changed." He expressed his hopes that we could get a lot accomplished in the next few hours and see some positive results come from the session. IR DISCUSSION Chuck began the discussion with the following statement: "Goals and objectives are great when working from a position of credibility. They are perceived cynically when worked on with little credibility. Change is much harder to accommodate when the group's credibility is questionable." Is the organization viewed as credible? There were a range of responses varying from very credible to not credible at all. Through the discussions it became clear that credibility is based on a range of factors varying from issue to issue. If Council decides an issue that the citizenry agrees with, they will be viewed as very credible. If they disagree, credibility will be questioned. The group agreed that credibility is often based on getting what you want. Credibility may also be based on longevity. Many of the members of our Council and staff have been involved with the City for years, gaining valuable insight and knowledge about the City and its residents. This may also factor into credibility. Credibility is also influenced by information--where did it come from--who brought it forward-- and what/if any are the motives behind the information?Facts or statements taken out of context can lead to credibility issues as well. Does Council view the staff as credible? There were a range of responses to this question. It was pointed out that we have a very professional staff with a wide range of experience and expertise on which to draw. Credibility becomes an issue when it appears that staff may have an agenda in the information that is brought forward. Some of the questions raised were: How should the Council respond when residents bring forth conflicting information than what staff has presented? How much information does the staff need to bring forward to be seen by Council as credible? Should the staff present professional recommendations, or simply lay out the options for the Council to choose from? It was suggested that the credibility of the staff is damaged when residents are allowed to give incorrect information during public hearings. The question becomes then, how to distribute the right information? Should a time limit be set/enforced for those citizens speaking at the public hearings? Should staff or Council step in when an incorrect statement/or facts taken out of context are made? There was some concern that there are"behind the scenes" negotiations being made. This may contribute to the opinion that staff/and or Council is not credible. How do we improve communication to ensure that this is not how business is being conducted? How do we improve communication in the City—between Council members, staff and the citizenry? It was agreed that miscommunication/incorrect information is often a problem that causes credibility issues between the City and the residents. It was suggested that neighborhood liaisons/groups be organized to help the City Staff disseminate information quickly and accurately to the citizens. This would help get the word out, and keep people from feeling like they were being intentionally kept in the dark. It was pointed out, however, that although we can send the information out in one form, it can be easily interpreted differently or change quickly as the situation itself changes. It was also suggested that not enough communication was being done between the Council members, possibly due to the televised nature of the Council meetings and work sessions. One suggestion was made that we stop televising the work sessions, to help steer communication toward a more open and less political format. It would be the time to "roll up our sleeves and get to work." It was suggested that staff often communicates too much to the Council for decision making. Although not a unanimous feeling, some of the Council felt that the City Administrator should take more authority in making decisions concerning budget transfers and various administrative affairs. This may alleviate the often heavy Council and work session agendas each week, allowing time and energy to be focused on bigger issues. IV. CLOSING REMARKS The retreat concluded with a projection by the City Administrator of the three main issues facing Mounds View in the future. The first issue is cash flow. As we enter the budget process, this is the time to start planning for the future. With the new Community Center opening up later this year, Mounds View will be facing financial questions new to all. The budget will be the tool to plan not only the future financial goals of the City, but also commercial development and long range overall goals for the City. The second major issue will be street improvements. Using Spring Lake Road as an example,what can staff and Council do to put together a long range strategic plan for the streets that makes sense for the future of Mounds View. Finally, what does the future hold for development of Mounds View. The theater project will certainly not be the last controversy this Council and Staff will face in terms of commercial development for Highway 10. What steps and planning can we undertake now to make deal with similar development issues in the future. More importantly, what role does the Council want to take in the future development of Mounds View? INFORMATION Management Meeting Minutes ONLY Wednesday, May 13, 1998 10:00 I. Department Reports Rick Jopke reported that the theater project passed through the Council 4 to 1. If all goes as planned, the project should be completed by the end of the year. There are many other improvements that need to happen in the meantime, e.g. realignment of Edgewood, Comprehensive Plan amendments, rezoning etc. The wetland at the Community Center was delineated and determined to not be located in the parking lot. Mary Saarion reported that our forester, Rick Wrisky, projected a steep increase in tree disease due to the drastic ice storm we suffered this winter. The large amount of broken branches create infestation sites for disease. A large tree planting has been scheduled this month along Long Lake Rd./118.Advertising is underway for the Community Center, with the Yellow Pages etc. The operations budget for the Community Center was discussed, as the Children's Center is not pulling in the revenue that was projected originally. Chuck asked that an operations budget be prepared for Council review for the June work session, with projections of revenue generation over the next few years. Mary also reported that picnic shelter reservations are particularly high for the summer already. On May 21, Pinewood 3rd graders will be touring the facility. Patrick Toth, our cable producer, is taking a leave of absence to spend the summer teaching in Europe. He is training in Kristi and other volunteers to cover his duties in his absence. Bruce Kessel reported that the audit should be done at the end of next week. Bruce attended the Cable meeting and reported that new cable drops were being installed in the lift stations. On May 28, there will be a meeting to discuss the cable lines that will be upgraded, with new wires in the whole system. Chief Ramacher reported that DARE graduation is Tuesday. Linda Meyers is still out with a broken arm. The City has received 4 Defibrillator machines, from Medtronics and the Lions Club. There will be training held for City hall employees. The ticketing and speed monitoring effort has resulted in 5-6 tickets per day. He also reported that the Police Department had not received one speed limit or stop sign complaint in the past 30 days. Mike Ulrich reported that although Council agreed to the upgrade of the HVAC system,there is no contract in place as of yet. The earliest the system could be running is September. Mike also reported that he met with the interior designer for the Community Center. Nothing has been decided, however, as the exact amount of funds available are still uncertain. Chuck Whiting reported that the retreat is still scheduled for Monday, May 18. The topic will be "Creating Understanding" and"Credibility."Attendance is mandatory. The meeting adjourned at 12:30 PM. MIS Meeting May 20, 1998, 1:30pm Attendance: Chuck, Jim E., Jim E., Bruce K., Jim H., Tracy J. Absent: Bob Nelson, Pat Toth Jim Hess brought everyone up to speed on the firewall situation for the intemet. Dave Johnson is no longer with MultiTech, so the firewall has been put on hold indefinitely. Jim and Dave will be arranging a meeting with the new replacements at MultiTech to discuss the arrangements and status of working with the City of Mounds View. Jim Hess and Bruce Kessel briefly spoke about the concern of the current Novell Server and that it is outdated and has limited memory space. It may be possible that once the Finance NT Server is up and running, we will be able to utilize it also. A new computer has been ordered and it will go to Marge in Finance. (Her old computer will then be passed on to Chuck.) Jim Hess also informed the group, that those that have Windows NT cannot backup to the current Novell Server. (Incompatible) Those that have questions on how to backup their NT workstation, should contact Jim Hess. The group talked briefly about changing the day and time of future meetings. All agreed to be flexible and meet whenever possible. Respectfully Submitted: (Next Meeting scheduled for June 17 at 1:30pm.) INFORMATION _Y