Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1998/01/05 Q) )' WORK SESSION 101 AG AGENDAi:':i:'ii:[i::i::['ii::i:::: i::i:i:i':%Si'C::: „,, "Ihisnoollinpoggty5gngaiiiinni,Bin ................................................................................. gigi:Iulsegic:;.:ei,:.",":•11111"16:0 ......................................................................................... „„,„, Items Discussed Per Consensus 1. Senator Novak Legislative Update. A. Legislative issues B. MAC Status 2. Discussion of Assessment Policies and Street Maintenance Program Update. 3. Discussion of County Road J and Airport Road Status. 4. Review of Mounds View Drive Residents Meeting. 5. Discussion of Stop Sign on Mounds View Drive and Silverview Drive. • 6. Discussion of Personnel Manual. 7. Discussion of Multi Jurisdictional Remodeling Planbook Proposal. 8. Discussion of Revised Development Concept for Red Oaks No. 3 Addition at County Rd. H-2 and Long Lake Road. 9. Discussion of Economic Development Director Replacement Proposals. 10. Discussion of 1998 Council Board Appointments. 11. Discussion of Cable TV Franchise Agreement Extension. 12. Discussion of Multi-City Athletic Facility. 13. Discussion of Preparation Materials for Council Retreat. 14. Discussion of Golf Course Projects. CLOSED SESSION • 15. Discussion of Golf Course Litigation Status. 16. Discussion of Collective Bargaining Agreements Status. I 0 MEMO • ,/ December 29, 1997 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator Re: January 5, 1998 City Council Work Session We have several items to review this Monday, but I do not expect it to be an overly lengthy meeting. Here's what we have so far: Item 1 - Senator Novak: Steve Novak will meet with the Council to review any issues we may have interest in prior to the upcoming legislative session. Two items I suggest bringing to his attention are first the mobile home resolution regarding the League of Minnesota Cities' effort this Council approved earlier this month. Second, he should be made aware of any interest in the Council may have in the work Geri Evans is doing on the house side regarding Municipal State Aid funding formulas. I think rather than telling him about Evans' work, perhaps relaying to him the problems Mounds View is having in working with residents who want more say so over their street construction specifications may be more appropriate. Evans' efforts right now are directed at the MNDOT Commissioner and not at the legislature. Naturally, the MAC airport plan should be discussed. Novak chaired another meeting this month attended by myself, the mayor and city attorney. At Bob Long's suggestion, MAC officials were asked to consider jointly filing a request for a declaratory judgement to clear up the conflicts present in Met Council plans and past legislation. He and Bob can review that for the Council. Other issues that can be discussed include further efforts at property tax reform, the state budget surplus relative to cities, and anything we should be aware of in a state bonding bill. This is our best opportunity we have to communicate directly with Steve so don't be afraid to bring things up. Item 2 - Discussion of Assessment Policies and Street Maintenance Program Status: With the holidays and vacations it has been a little hard getting as much done on this as I would like. However, between Bruce, Mike and the SEH guys some has gotten done. Perhaps this will be enough to get the ball rolling. Mike and Steve Campbell have developed a matrix that may assist in addressing the issues we face here and should be able to present it as best possible Monday evening. There will still be more work to do and the Council may want to consider a special work session date for later in January to work on this. Item 3 - Discussion of County Road J and Airport Road Status: We will try to address the status of this again as well. Item 4 -Review of Mounds View Drive Residents Meeting: I pretty much covered everything in my memo of December 19. Since two Council members were not there, some discussion of • what took place would be appropriate. I have been asked by the newly formed residents committee to keep them appraised of meetings and correspondence regarding their area, so there of the Director of Community Development. Our CD Director Rick Jopke does have economic 111 development experience and wduld do well in overseeing this position and having it contribute to community development efforts. Three things to keep in mind however, first, with the lower level pay will likely come a less experienced individual. That could be overcome with Rick's experience. Second, the administrative support I currently receive would not be available, meaning either it is no longer present or it is replaced with someone like an intern. The last intern with the city was paid $10 an hour with no benefits. And third, this option can mean more responsibility for the CD Director which may lead to a need to reevaluate his position and pay. Option 3: Rather than placing the emphasis on economic development, create an assistant city administrator position whose duties amongst others is to manage economic development work. One duty that will need to be performed for any of the three options is to staff the needs of the EDC and EDA. The type of individual that will likely apply for this position will be more of an administrative type(such as myself). One aspect of this approach would be to create more of a management team approach to economic development amongst the city administrator, community development director and assistant. It likely offers the most flexibility in utilizing the skills of any given applicant, but may be harder to defend in the long run if given hard scrutiny in budgeting. The salary range could be set anywhere between$35,000 to $60,000, depending on expectations and commitment to policy objectives. I think the key thing here for the Council to consider, if something other than what is in place now were to be looked at, is just what is the desired outcome for the City in working in economic 0 development. These three options, four if an intern option is considered, reflect policy priorities more than anything else. My preference is to find the best person available to meet the needs of the community and Council. Item 8 -Discussion of 1998 Council Board Appointments: A list of board and commission openings is enclosed, as well as Council position liaisons. The Council should attempt to assign the liaisons quickly in order to begin meeting with the respective boards in January. Item 9 - Cable TV Franchise Agreement Extension: This is the same extension that was done a couple of months ago. Tom Creighton's letter explains the need to do it again. With Council permission, I will add to the consent agenda for January 12. Item 10 - Multi-City Athletic Facility: Back earlier in the fall the mayor, myself and Mary Saarion were invited to a discussion with the other cities in the school district and the school district. The meeting outlined the school's need for more athletic facilities and the proposition was made to have the cities collaborate in finding a site, possibly contributing to facility construction and participating in joint programming. The logical site is somewhere on the arsenal property. While I have some concerns about the approach, the City of Arden Bills is offering to take some type of lead on this with monetary help from the other communities. Rather than decide whether to contribute now or not (it is not specifically in the budget), my suggestion is to continue to participate in the joint meetings. A second one will likely come up in January. I am a 0 little concerned about being swept into something that may require a financial commitment without consideration being given to the commercial development potential of such a facility. I yzi J4 ©05FY OF Phone: (612) 717-4000 4111k�A nliDe Fax: (612) 784-3462 ogress • PartneCsb' December 23, 1997 Andrea Stearns Intergovernmental Relations Representative League of Minnesota Cities 145 University Avenue East St. Paul, MN 55103 Dear Andrea: The Mounds View City Council approved the LMC drafted resolution regarding legislation requiring the Minnesota Department of Health to conduct a statewide study of mobile home parks. The City of Mounds View has attempted to work closely with residents in our community's mobile home parks in ensuring a safe living environment. We have often found our abilities to effectively deal with park 0 issues often frustrated by park ownership problems. Park residents seem to then suffer the consequences of code enforcement or bad park management. If you need any information or support for encouraging this legislation, please feel free to contact me. It has been an issue for Mounds View. Thank you. Sincerely, cd,„4.z„.z2...T__ Chuck Whiting Mounds View City Administrator • • FAPRINTED WITH tr 2401 Highway 10• Mounds View, MN 55112-1499SOY INK TM recycled paper Equal Opportunity Employer Lie, 4' TO: Mayor and City Council • FROM: SLWHA special committee MEMORANDUM Co-chairman Julie Olsen SUBJECT: O'Neil Property 2430 Highway 10 Planning Case No. 471-97 DATE: December 29, 1997 At the request of Chuck Whiting we are sending this request to you for action at your planning meeting of January 5, 1998, and the subsequent City Council meeting on January 12, 1998. It is our request that the City Council take formal action to achieve the following two requests: 1. That the City of Mounds View discontinue any present and or future plans for a "Ring Road" to carry vehicular traffic from Edgewood Road to Long Lake Road over any portion of the "O'Neil" Property. 2. That the City of Mounds View require agreement from any developer of the "O'Neil" Property to: A. Prohibit any vehicular access from the proposed theater/office development area to Long Lake Road. B. Prohibit any vehicular access from the proposed theater/office area to the "Outlot A" being planned at the corner of Long Lake Road and Highway 10. C. Restrict any curb cut to Long Lake Road from the proposed "Outlot A" to an area north of the Mounds View Drive intersection and preferably restrict such curb cut to a right in- right out access with an island on Long Lake Road north of Mounds View Drive. Thank you for having the special meeting of December 16, 1997 with us in order to soon reach resolution on this matter. Sincerely, Julie Ann Olsen cc: Mounds View Chuck Whiting, Rick Jopke, Planning Commission, Robert Long • Anthony Properties Mgt. Inc. Wendell Smith T5 Item No. 6 Type of Business: WK WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; • CA:Consent Agenda;CB: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City C unci) From: Lynnette Morga Item Title/Subject: Personnel Man I Date of Meeting: January 5, 1998 The attached letter from John LeFevre at Kennedy and Graven summarizes certain policy issues which require further discussion by the City Council. Bob Long will be present at Monday's meeting to provide additional comments. • • • 470 Pillsbury Center Kennedy 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 sL Graven (612) 337-9300 telephone (612):337-9310 fax e-mill:attys@kennedy-graven.com CHARTERED JOHN M. LEFEVRE,JR. Attorney at Law Direct Dial(612)337-9218 December 3, 1997 BY FAX & U.S. MAIL Lynnette Morgan Assistant to the City Administrator City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 RE: Personnel Issues MU210-18 Dear Ms. Morgan: • 7 Although we have not completely our review of the proposed personnel handbook as yet, I wanted to let you know of the certain policy issues which are appropriate for discussion by the council as they consider adoption of revised personnel policies. 1. At Will Employment v. Termination for Cause: In the introduction to the handbook, the description states that just as employees are free to terminate employment with the city at any time for any reason, the city remains free to terminate employment at any time for any reason not prohibited by law. This would describe the concept known as "Employment At-Will" which would also mean that there is no property right in continued employment with the city. However, at Section 1.10 dealing with Discipline, the standard for any discipline appears to be "just cause." This suggests that just cause as defined is required to be the basis for discipline up to and including termination. This is a relatively common employment policy, especially in the context of union contracts, but is not required as a matter of • employment law. I would also note that the Section 4.05 on discharge uses a "just cause" standard which is inconsistent with employment at-will. • The point is that the city needs to consider which of these two policies it wishes to adopt: that is, employment at will, or termination for cause. They are essentially inconsistent. Once this policy decision is made, then the handbook can be revised accordingly. JML134457 M13210-18 December 3, 1997 4110 Page 2 -,i 2. Authority for Personnel Actions: I noted that in the draft of the handbook, either the city administrator, or the department head with the concurrence of the city council, may terminate an employee. See Section 1.10 subd. 4. My understanding was that the council was the appointing authority and had the authority to hire and fire, other than possibly for seasonal and temporary employees. This is an area which needs clarification. I would also point out that the definition of appointing authority includes the city council or clerk administrator to whom the city council has delegated authority to appoint personnel. This points out the policy issue for the city council as to what authority should be delegated to the clerk administrator. 3. Grievance Policy Section 1.35: The current procedure allows grievances to proceed to step 5 which is a petition for the city council to hear the grievance. I am assuming this means that if there is a petition to the council to hear grievance, then the council will hear that grievance. It could mean that the council simply has the option of whether to hear grievance or not. The policy issue would be whether the council wishes to make itself the last resort for a grievance hearing or not. al 4. Probationary Period Section 1.65: I would simply note here that there is a probationary period of six months for most employees but one year for public employees. I am not sure of the reason for the diffe ence, butthiiiss es entially maintenance policy issue. In any case, it would need to conform to the definition section where probationary period is defined as six months, without any reference to the different time period set out earlier for public works maintenance employees. Lynette, the above issues are not meant to be an exhaustive review of the proposed handbook. Instead, they simply point out some policy issues for discussion with the council. As I have told you, Dan Greensweig of our office is looking at the drug testing policy provisions as particular, and Scott Riggs of our office is also reviewing the policy for additional suggestions. We will be in touch with you about that review. Very truly yours, fhin John M. LeFevre, Jr. JML// cc: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator (Fax & Mail) Robert C. Long 411/ Daniel J. Greensweig Scott J. Riggs JML1344S7 MU2L0-18 i Item No. 7 Staff Report No. Meeting Date: 1/5/98 S S . a/ Type of Business: Council Business WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business Cit of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Steve Dorgan, Housing Inspector Item Title/Subject: Multi Jurisdictional Remodeling Planbook Proposal Date of Report: December 24, 1997 BACKGROUND The city has an opportunity to be a part of a consortium of communities,predominately inner ring suburbs, which have proposed the creation of a "Remodeling Planbook"to address the problems and potential opportunities associated with the post World War II housing stock within their communities. The proposal is modeled after a planbook created for the Longfellow Neighborhood in the City of Minneapolis. REMODELING PLANBOOK FUNCTION Much of the housing within the inner ring suburbs were built post World War II era. Most of these 4110 homes do not currently meet the current lifestyles and demographics of today's homeowners. They are typically marketed to first time home buyers and used as transitional or transient housing. In addition, the home owners stay is usually shortened due to the lack of space and amenities provided in the housing located at the growing edges of the region. The Remodeling Planbook is designed to provide an incentive to homeowners to move into or to remain in the inner-ring cities versus moving out to developing suburbs. The incentives will be provided to homeowners by identifying technical, educational, and financial services to tap into. The Remodeling Planbook will also provide ideas, inspiration, tools, encouragement, and support to homeowners. The Planbook would also be intended to serve as a marketing tool to promote the advantages of living within inner-ring cities and to inspire homeowners to remodel their home and stay. ANTICIPATED SERVICES Possible Planbook Features ► Identify and explain the structure and architectural features of the chosen housing styles including floor layouts and functional considerations. ► Identify and explain the changing housing trends. ► Develop a variety of design alternatives for each housing type. • Include graphic images, photographs, and plans to make the Planbook understandable to homeowners. ► The Planbook will be made adaptable to other media forms such as the Internet and • cable TV. ► Written guidelines to enhance the appearance of housing including landscaping, fencing, and accessory buildings. ► Identification of advantages for living within participating inner-ring cities. V- -)C 3 vi to CD0 • ':/. 4 U ao00o00o000o Co 0) 0000000000 CO y =__ C00000000000 Co -Fa y u' r` o 0 0 o o o tri tri tr)to N. II) 0 N. N. N. (0CDNCo •cr C C) <` _._:O C co Co Co CO Co Co co v v H C::; r Nt N = o 00000000000 O - O 0) 0000000000 0) N-..O o 0 o 0 co to to tr•) in N. t�II ..i � tr)o r-N N-N CD CD CO co U) a) O C'') Q) Co CO Co CO CO Co it er er -o a Q x - 00 0 0 • 0 ton 0 0 LO ▪ CO C') c� .a' E '� E fII - >, otL 0 _-- y i - = � Q � - too00o000000 to j -C � -r- 00oo000000 N- O "0 o • r- 0000000000 r� y CD ,'- ' O -tr)o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o tr) II y >— U) 0000000 It) tn lA C Q.•- co C) LC) to In N') to tr) tr) tr) N N tr) O p 0 _ V O — .... a)o pc a) > p 5: c . o o °) Eo V 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O v 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o O 0 O o C5 5 .E O00000000o0 o c p > a) Co00000000ttitr) o c a C to in 111 1.0 o 1.11tr) r) In LALON N0 ai O J 1.0m Lit CO ov O .r c 0 0 0 88880000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (.75 d • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O cm o •Com"' uloo0000000 ton -6 d y C (NNNNNNNNY- c• N a) _ a g c •- 2• a N o M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M N O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N w Oo00000000 r C o r- o_ C N 0 0 0 0 0 0 U)I)0 0 (N in o 0 to N N CV N 0. 1- T T 0) C n• C C ;::::r N th d CA C • y = 0/ 0 C a> a m a cu Xd 13 W rr cic y co CDtiCOQ) 0 .- NCf) ettoCD c y �: 0) () 0) 0) 0000000 N- 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0000000) 0. >- ." Ti NNNNNNCV m 00 2 S Ci N 0. 0 Item No. F Staff Report No. Meeting Date: 1/5/98 . Type of Business: WK WK: Work Session:PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda:CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Discussion of revised development concept for Red Oaks No. 3 Addition at County Road H-2 and Long Lake Road Date of Report: December 30, 1997 BACKGROUND In 1974 the City approved a plat for the Red Oaks No. 3 Addition submitted by Mr. Keith Harstad at the south west corner of the intersection of County Road H-2 and Long Lake Road. The plat contained 74 lots to accommodate 72 townhouse units in 11 buildings.The number of units per building varied from 4 to 8. The plat was properly recorded. The site was and still is zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. The comprehensive plan designation of the site is low density residential. It is unclear to me what the comprehensive plan designation of the site was in 40 1974. In 1974 the zoning ordinance allowed townhouses as a permitted use in the R-1 zoning district. A building permit for one 6 unit building was issued and the building was constructed. Subsequent to this approval the City amended its zoning ordinance and townhouses are no longer permitted in the R-1 zoning district. In 1984 Mr. Harstad requested that the City rezone the property to R-3 medium density residential. Townhouses up to 6 units are conditional uses in the R-3 zoning district. As I understand it there have been some legal actions relative to this site. I have asked Bob Long to summarize the legal matters for the council at the January 5th work session. CURRENT PROPOSAL Mr. Harstad has submitted for City review a revised concept for the site. Based on the history of the site and the fact that current staff was not present for the past approvals and denials, we have put this item on the January 5,1998 work session agenda for council discussion and direction. The current proposal involves the construction of 10 twinhomes and 3 three-unit buildings on the site. A total of 29 new units will be constructed. This compares to the 66 units which could have been constructed under the original plat. Including the 6 units that were constructed the density under the current proposal would be 3.09 units per acre. The density of the previous proposal was 6.36 units per acre. For comparison purposes the maximum density of a single family development i which would meet the current Mounds View code would be 3.96 units per acre. Depending on the exact delineation of the wetland up to 23 single family lots could be platted on the undeveloped portion of the site. The proposed units would be considerably larger and generate Z 99 991-- M•St,21.05 - _ / - 1 . .. I . i, I________�LI______ I „np __ -- •p I1 .—_t� L_ ____. -- .-_ 1 - ----II' il I Jii - i' — -- �i, �__ f i *. Lt„ -.� I 0 r. .• r t,-- IS 2. 7~ , . b = i _ 1 . ,- Zi eN O 9• r / ♦tB1 ^ Nl.,.^:: Ik'~-. 1 T iT....-:4—'_:1.1,,i1. = 1 q .enet _` ---OL6 -• ,(1ON---^10101,040,1110 no rsr l �y< 1, 1 I �r I ?i I I I Lu F--__ t l..i.... ,..ii 1 c �.a 1 1 i r : '_ 1 1 0 • 1 o -1 } -T; 1:,- •'0000_)1..[1.00.1 php _ g it 3 i° .Nt -:p9 0tl..0• 1 0 - W '......1 ;.y TJ �, .T ' 1 "a - -;Vr- 0 ,yam _ „ i iW ".1 ..4,,. : c3i, % _ IR !. ,,' h 2 f ~ 1tFe { N —, t Q -, 111� ; S •..�T• ' 0 —— ` ... h e -2 a b n b i M it-» a C 2 1 „b` ,� Ir. •� -. wf Ir MEN y+.•n.J - Z, �f< �� met tVMJ<on I.M)f<•_ __Mrl { x r c r ek 1 ,. / Rf/91I } 1 8 I o; POSITION REPLACEMENT SALARY INFORMATION 'Min. Max. Assistant Manager Stanton 6 47,000 58,900 Economic Dev. Coor Mounds View (1994) 35,616 44,520 Economic Dev. Coor Mounds View (1996) 36,682 53,581 Dir. of Econ. Dev. Mounds View (1997) 45,880 57,350 Human Resource Tech. Mounds View (1997) 27,876 34,845 Admin. Intern @10.00 * 23,306 Administrative Assistant Stanton 6 36,000 44,400 • *does not included PERA or health insurance • 12/30/97 RESOLUTION NO. 5202 f CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA 0RESOLUTION REAPPOINTING COMMISSION MEMBERS FOR THREE YEAR TERMS EXPIRING DECEMBER 31,2000 WHEREAS,The terms of the persons listed below have expired on the various commissions they serve; and Planning Commission Jerry Peterson Parks and Recreation Commission Pamela Starr Scott Dentz Police Civil Service Commission Ray Long WHEREAS,each person whose term is expiring has been contacted and has indicated a desire to continue serving as a member of the commission or committee which they serve; and WHEREAS,the Commissions consists of members appointed by the Mayor with the approval of the majority of the Council. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor does hereby re-appoint and the City Council approve the 0 wing persons for three year teens expiring on December 31,2000. Planning Commission Park and Recreation Commission Police Civil Service Commission Golf Course Commission(NEW) Duane McCarty Chuck Whiting John Hammerschmidt Bruce Kessel Councilmember Adopted this 12th day of January, 1998 ATTEST: Mayor McCarty .L) City Administrator Chuck Whiting /D • December 28, 1997 Duane McCarty Mayor City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Mayor McCarty: With this letter I submit my application for continued service on the Parks and Recreation Commission. I have found it a most rewarding experience and wish to continue my service to the community. Sincerely, • E - Scott Dentz • ._Lm /D RESOLUTION NO. 98-EDA79 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OFFICERS WHEREAS,Article III, Section 3.1 of the Economic Development Authority Bylaws requires that the President, Vice-President and Secretary be elected annually at the first meeting of the year, and WHEREAS, President, Vice-President and Secretary appointment shall be duly elected members of the Mounds View City Council, and WHEREAS, Treasurer, Executive Director/Assistant Treasurer and Clerk need not be duly elected members of the Mounds View City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Economic Development Authority of the City of Mounds View appoints the following persons to serve in the following positions. President - Vice President - Secretary- Treasurer- Executive Director/Assistant Treasurer - Clerk- • Adopted this 12th day of January, 1998. ATTEST: President (SEAL) Executive Director • .As . RESOLUTION NO. 98-EDA80 • j CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION REAPPOINTING MEMBERS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND DESIGNATING AN EDA LIAISON WHEREAS, the Economic Development Commission acts as an advisory commission to the Economic Development Authority(EDA) on matters that relate to fostering a positive economic climate, encouraging economic development, and enhancing the tax base of the City; and WHEREAS, the membership of the Economic Development Commission is comprised of four residents and three business representatives; and WHEREAS, the terms of the below listed persons expired on December 31, 1997; and Rosemary Goff Steven Larson Brian Sjoberg(Dynex Industries) EDA Liaison Duane McCarty . EDA Alternate Liaison Gary Quick WHEREAS, each person is interested in being reappointed to the Economic Development Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Economic Development Authority of the City of Mounds View hereby reappoints the following persons to the Economic Development Commission for terms expiring as follows: Rosemary Goff December 31, 2000 Steve Larson December 31, 2000 Brian Sjoberg (Dynex) December 31, 2000 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Economic Development Authority of the City of Mounds View hereby designates Commissioner as the EDA Liaison and Commissioner as the alternate EDA • Liaison with terms expiring December 31, 1998 Adopted this 12th day of January, 1998. ATTEST: • President (SEAL) Executive Director RESOLUTION NO. 98-EDA8 1 •wr CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ELECTED CHAIRPERSON WHEREAS, the Municipal Code Chapter 408.07, Subdivision 1 entitled Economic Development Commission, Organization states that "at the first regular meeting of the year, the Commission shall appoint a chairperson from among its voting members and that this appointment shall be subject to Authority approval and shall consist of a one year term"; and WHEREAS, through a unanimous vote of the Economic Development Commission members on December 18, 1997 Cindy Carlson was appointed chairperson of the Economic Development Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Economic Development Authority of the City of Mounds View hereby approves the • appointment of Cindy Carlson as chairperson of the Economic Development Commission. Adopted this 12th day of January, 1998. Ari' ST: President - (SEAL) Executive Director �-e-yn / cont • alSILVER LAKE WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 2 6 1 5 Lake Court Drive, Mounds View M N, 5 5 1 1 2 Date: IJ c„ e b r— r�{ t g q To: MoV,Ss V. ZA- Ci � / " A0z,G ce- / 1i Lt C r Subject: . Pe �I z i k.% e c( i C �� Cc .,.,:r, ',`o Tke- C 1 laicrt:'� pee r� +� z�� l,, 1--er�5- ;h J p z r fc YC) "f kQ PZ r IC j /VI IC -eV 7ita � 3j 4.2kC Cc •_:), ` irC 7� C — 3C, fs`t 2vLe" � 'rJttj5 2G "73 Lz1 vrf Circt 1 3 — i653 • (A) /;a+iv‘ v e 2-4c3 L Z (ce Cc v,-+ C i'rc/e 71(3 — 9 3C(... 7g, - 63141 (Z-„,`e+ 0,1 - _Si. GU 1-f A 7V5- ?ACJ /0 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW , 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW,MN 55112 612-717-4000 • APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY GROUPS Group Applied For: Second Choice(if any): Full Name(print or type): L 1 i LL,a_„Z /lid Lk v� iYl r� Home Phone: Work or Other: 7g4_ - c503 Address: /994" ( n-werd iz � Years at this address: y Years you have lived in Mounds View: vel QUALIFICATIONS YOU WANT TO HAVE THE COUNCIL CONSIDER • Skills and Interests: e t ke.001 Employment, Occupation,or Other Experience: C0 Tt 1 Q 461 c l a,l3• �,` `. Memberships,Accomplishments,or Other Qualifications: cat a d ,b4-e' Please state your reason for wanting to serve on this committee: k Your response to any of the above inquires may be continued on the back and you may attach any other material which ou want the City Council to consider. • Signature: 74a- r 41-/; 4-tiir'-w-/ Date: % �/g� The City ofMounds View is committed to the policy that all persons shall have access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, creed color,sex, age, national orgin, or handicap. Tli C .1112 Tht 'yf Lv • The AssOciates of The Clarity GroupTM Our associates have distinguished themselves in various fields, including customer service, sales, marketing, human resources, operations management, quality and process management, diversity, leadership, partnership, government and organizational effectiveness We partner with you at an individual, personal level as well as organizationally to help you accomplish your goals. We bring our expertise to you through coaching, consulting, facilitation,presentation and training. Rita Goldhammer Associate Rita Goldhammer is a management consultant who focuses on transition. She believes that the effective management of transition is critical in today's competitive market place. Her diverse background has equipped her to develop special skills in organizational and individual transition management,as well as training. She has over 15 years of experience in career management and has direct operational experience supporting national and international operations. Goldhammer has led strategic • process; designed and implemented organizational culture change initiatives; and, managed start-up, turnaround and downsizing operations. Rita's solid background as a facilitator and coach is demonstrated in her ability to help individuals address both personal and business risks that are present in business today. Rita attended the Curt Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota as a recipient of a Bush Leadership Fellowship. Her undergraduate degree is from Mankato State University. She also attended Harvard University where she focused on management training. Most recently,Rita co-authored a book called A Moving Experience, which is the first part in the Transition Series, a family of books to assist people during life's critical transitions. The book is currently used by both national and international clients. Rita has been described as a professional who successfully attained meeting organizational strategies due to an optimistic attitude,keen perception,dedication,and loyalty to teams. 1133 Rankin Street,Suite 327 Clarity Inspires Excellence' Saint Paul,MN 55116 612-699-9006 12-29-1997 13:41 I -ten I1 ill BERNICK AND LIFSON .4.,, A PROI[SSIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS AT LAY, NUL J. SMASISO SUITS 1200,TAle COLONNA0S 'ALS*AOMil-me IN WISCONSIN 'Au0 crAISD ouliK.IC AcCOLINTANTSAWL A. •CKNICK. 4500 WAYZATA SO.LLVARO 'ALSO AOM11fS0 IN /�cono. THOMAS O. C>•L13NTON MINNeAPOL.I5, MINNCSOTA ■SOIL-1270 SCOTT A. LIPSON -- LEGAL.ASSISTANT DAVID K. NIOMTINOALit TCLL*MONti I5I>2) D4i-1200 KAYMRYN 0. MASTCSMgN PAUL J. ONAST. PACSIMINK(5131 SAS-10033 SOagRT J.N.V0E WILLIAM 3. RORSOLIO" • December 29, 1997 IMPORTANT: FOR YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION . Via facsimile and U.S Mail Mr. Chuck Whiting City Administrator City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 410 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Whiting: • On October 23, 1997, I sent to you an Ordinance Amendment providing for the extension of the cable television franchise. Although I have only received a copy of your adopted extension from half of you, I assume you have extended your cable franchise until January 19, 1998, as recommended. Since then,we have been negotiating the final cable franchise with the cable company. Since the same individuals have also been involved in the extensive review regarding the transfer of ownership,the company and the Commission have not completed the final documents for city review. Enclosed please find a proposed Ordinance Amendment, extending the franchise for an additional ninety(90) days. The company and the Commission are convinced that it will not take the full ninety days to finish the negotiation of the documents,but to avoid the city hassle of adopting another extension,the ninety day time period was agreed to. The extension does not change the underlying terms of the current franchise, and basically mainta4ns the status quo until the final new documents are negotiated. Please adopt the atached Ordinance Amendment andsendnotification to this office. We will 411) send you the new negotiated franchise ordinance as soon as the Cable Commission has reviewed and approved it. 12-29-1997 13:42 6125461003 BERNICK & LIFSON P.03 City of Ordinance No, • AN ORDINANCE FURTHER AMENDING CABLE FRANCHJS:E ORDINANCE NO. ARTICLE IL, SECTION 4, FRANCHISE TERM. THE COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. , Article II., Section 4, Franchise Term, is hereby amended to read: Section 4. Franchise Terra This Franchise shall commence upon the effective date of the regular certificate of confirmation issued by the Board and shall expire on April 20, 1998. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage'and official publication. • PASSED by the City Council this_day of 1998. Mayor City Administrator- ATTEST: Introduced Adopted Published Effective Accepted by Grantee this day of , 1998: GROUP W CABLE OF THE NORTH SUBURBS, INC. By: C:\CABLE NSCCCCIRFS.A,12 CITY OF AR D E N HILLS Qo`� ,1:450 WEST HIGHWAY 96 ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112-5794 December 5, 1997 Mary Saarion Mounds View Parks and Recreation Director 2401 Hwy 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Mary: When the Mayors, Managers, Parks and Recreation Directors, and School District Officials met on October 21 to discuss the results of the Facility Needs Study, the direction was to move forward with developing a possible concept plan. The City of Arden Hills has agreed to take the lead in this endeavor. However, we need the commitment of support from the other cities and the school district before we expend any funds. 111 The Arden Hills City Council passed a resolution that supports developing the concept plan and having Arden Hills take the lead role. We would like all of the participating parties to pass a similar resolution. If it is not possible to get this item on your agenda within the next week or two, please send me a letter of support. The letter and resolution should support the idea of a joint facility (location undetermined at this time) and commit to reimburse Arden Hills for a portion of the money expended to develop concept plans. Our resolution states that the concept plan at this time would not exceed $10,000. Thus, each party would be responsible for a maximum of$2,000. Please call me at 633-5676 if you have any questions. I would like to get started on this, but I cannot start until I have a commitment from all cities. The intent is to review the concept plan at the next scheduled meeting with the Mayors, Managers, and Parks and Recreation Directors on January 20, 1998. Sincerefy, id(. Walsh Parks and Recreation Director • cc: Chuck Whiting, Mounds View City Manager PHONE: 1612) 633-5676 • FAX 1612) 633-7839