Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1998/02/09 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1998 7:00 PM 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL: McCarty, Stigney, Koopmeiners, Quick, Gunn 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular meeting of January 26, 1998 4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: Mayor's State of the City Address 5. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Just and Correct Claims B. Acceptance of Advisory Commission Minutes 4101. Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes - December 4, 1997 C. Licenses for Approval D. Adoption of Resolution No. #5210 Approving Rice Creek North Regional Trail Master Plan as Prepared by Ramsey County. 6. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR A. Citizens: Before speaking must give their full name and address for the minutes. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. Consideration of Resolution No. 5209, Amending the Wastewater Operations Budget. B. Set a Public Hearing Monday, March 9, 1998 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Mounds View City Hall on street construction, maintenance and cost assessment policies. C. Discussion of Community Center Advisory Committee and Youth Planning Council. • • MEMO February 6, 1998 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator Re: February 9, 1998 City Council Meeting The agenda is relatively light for Monday evening, although things are going on. Here's what's on tap for Monday: Item 4-Special Order of Business-Mayor's State of the City: Mayor McCarty has asked to give a state of the city address for Monday night. Item 7A-Wastewater Budget Amendments: Mike and Bruce have prepared this information in regards to the discussion of manning the department over the next several months and beyond. In regards to concerns about whether this is premature or not,Mike and I have discussed this back into last fall. There was some thought of trying to incorporate the possibility of Wally Mortenson not coming back into the budget for 1998,but his operation and its results were not know. With the tight budget apparent, I figured waiting to see his status and considering an amendment to the budget • would be more practical,particularly if he turned out well. Staffs recommendation for Monday is to approve Resolution 5209 regarding this. Item 7B - Setting Public Hearing for Street Issues: In reflecting on the discussion of Monday evening, it was a little hard to determine exactly what the public hearing needed to do. With that in mind, I wrote a neutral type statement of purpose for the public hearing notice. I have put this on the regular agenda if the Council would like to discuss it since there may be expectations that a particularly preference is to be heard for street reconstruction at this hearing. I met with Bruce and Mike this week to review the work done to date and the meeting discussion to ensure we are prepared for the next series of discussions. Based on the discussions and input from residents, I figure there are about eight street construction and assessment options, three storm water options, two main policy changes that may have to be made for assessing and possibly construction standards, and then the corresponding time tables for any of the options. We are working on these with the idea that within two or three weeks we can bring this back to Council members to make choices. I expect we can have it done prior to the public hearing and perhaps review them with at the March 2 work session. As for Monday night,unless Council would like the wording done differently on the notice, it is just a matter of voting to set the hearing for March 9. • Item 7C - Committees for Community Center Oversight and Youth Activities Discussion: Council will recall this request being made at the last meeting. My main concerns are first, not creating more staff work, particularly in an area lacking staff, and second, doubling up on • Community Center building or its activities. They, as with the youth, would participate in those discussions and reports having to do with their subject and would be considered advisors to the Commission. This approach further opens participation but not by adding work to staff or confusing the Council relations with yet another board. These are my thoughts and if the Council wishes,these or other ideas could be formalized in writing and discussed with the Parks and Recreation Commission in the coming weeks, perhaps in a joint session. In other business,part of the week has been devoted to attempting to get hearings in the House and Senate on our airport legislation. Bob Long and Mayor McCarty visited the Capital separately on Thursday on this, and I have met with the administrators of Lexington and Circle Pines. Bob was told late Thursday the house will schedule it before the Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee. If this is so, some of us will likely have to go down and testify. The Senate will hopefully schedule a hearing once the House has. The political hurdles are interesting. Rick Jopke and I met with Dave Maroney on the Mermaid project and I have been trying to meet with each of you on aspects of the project. If you haven't talked with me yet,please give me a call. The two LELS bargaining units are essentially on hold. We are awaiting word on mediation for the patrol unit, likely in March, and the sergeants' meetings will now wait until spring when insurance premium information comes in. I am hoping to sometime get back to the public works agreement in time for Council action in March. Everest has contacted me regarding the building N project and now apparently are willing to proceed as the City last offered. I have talked with Jim O'Meara about finalizing the documents and he is proceeding. The Mayor and I attended the second meeting of the regional athletic facilities concept Tuesday night. Different possibilities were reviewed. It appears nothing substantial will happen on the arsenal site for some time so interest turned to evaluating existing fields and buildings for a more coordinated approach to recreation in the district. This will likely lead to discussions about city maintenance of school grounds as well. That's it for now. See you on Monday. • UNAPPROVED 0 Page 1 January 26, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 9 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 10 RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA 11 12 Regular Meeting 13 January 26, 1998 14 Mounds View City Hall 15 2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View,MN 55112 16 ********************************************************************************** 17 18 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: 19 110 20 The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:00 p.m.on January 26, 1998. 21 22 2. ROLL CALL: 23 24 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor McCarty,Council members Koopmeiners. 25 Quick,Gunn and Stigney 26 27 ALSO PRESENT: Chuck Whiting,Clerk Administrator 28 Bruce Kessel, Finance Director 29 Rick Jopke, Community Development Director 30 Jim Ericson,Planning Assistant 31 Bob Long,City Attorney 32 33 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 34 35 A. Regular Meetings of January 12, 1998. 36 37 Council member Gunn noted one correction to the January 12, 1998 minutes. Her name should be added 38 to the names of the Members Present. 39 40 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve the minutes of the January 12, 1998 City Council 41 Meeting AS CORRECTED. 42 43 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 44 • 45 4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: 46 47 None. UNAPPROVED 0 Page 3 January 26, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 1. Public Hearing: Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7:09 p.m. There were no questions 2 or comments from the public and Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 7:10 p.m. 3 4 2. Second Reading: 5 6 3. Consider Motion Adopting: MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Gunn to approve the Second Reading of 7 Ordinance No. 610 and to waive the reading. 8 I 9 ROLL CALL VOTE: 10 11 Mayor McCarty aye 12 Council member Koopmeiners aye 13 Council member Gunn aye 14 Council member Quick aye 15 Council member Stigney aye 16 17 Motion Carried - 5-0 18 19 B. Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution No.5204,Approving a Conditional Use Permit 20 for Linder's Greenhouses at Moundsview Square Shopping Center. 111/ 21 22 Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7:11 p.m. 23 24 Mr. Jim Ericson,Planning Associate,explained that Linder's Greenhouses has applied for a Conditional 25 Use Permit to allow for the operation of an outdoor flower market in the parking lot of Moundsview 26 Square. Permits have been issued to them for the years of 1995, 1996 and 1997. Mr.Ericson explained 27 that Mr.Linder intends to hook up to the fire hydrant on the property to get water and has agreed to a 28 charge of$1.40 per day this service. The flower market would operate from April 15 to June 30, 1998, 29 but would like the CUP to be effective from March 15 to July 15, 1998 to accommodate for seasonal 30 fluctuations and assembly/disassembly. Mr.Ericson noted that the applicant would like the Council to 31 consider some change to the process which would allow easier renewal of the Conditional Use Permit. 32 Staff has proposed some additional language in the Resolution which states that this Conditional Use 33 Permit may be re-approved by City staff without Planning Commission review and City Council action for 34 subsequent growing seasons contingent upon a) that there are no significant changes to the proposal; 35 b) that the property owner of record agrees in writing to the re-approval; c) that there have been no 36 problems with the operation that would warrant further review;and d) that the applicant submits the$100 37 CUP re-approval fee. 38 39 With no comments from the public in regard to this issue, Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 40 7:15 p.m. 41 42 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve Resolution No. 5204,Approving a Conditional Use 43 Permit for Linder's Greenhouses at Moundsview Square Shopping Center. 44 0 45 Council member Stigney asked if the water charge of$1.40 per day was locked in to the long-going CUP. 46 Mr. Ericson noted that this amount was subject to change. 47 UNAPPROVED • Page 5 January 26, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 arose as to whether or not a Wetland Delineation Report was done on the property. According to the 2 information they have,the property was not in the wetlands,however the Rice Creek Watershed District 3 maps,however, indicate that the property is in the wetland district. To verify the status, a Wetland 4 Delineation Report is required. This study cannot be completed until April and therefore the city must 5 decide if they want to postpone the project until Spring when the report can be completed,or prepare a site 6 plan for grading and drainage for just the building and the parking in front of the building and not do the 7 major parking lot where the potentially identified wetland area would be. This would keep the project on 8 track as far as timing. 9 10 Mr. Whiting noted that Resolution No. 5209 is incorrect. The Council should consider making a motion to 11 enter into a supplemental agreement with WAI Continuum based on the January 20, 1998 letter for 12 Supplemental Services billed on an hourly rate not to exceed$4,650.00. 13 14 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Gunn to authorize the city to enter into a Supplemental Agreement with WAI 15 Continuum based on the January 20, 1998 letter for Supplemental Services,billed on an hourly rate not to 16 exceed$4,650.00. 17 18 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 19 20 Mr. Olson explained that Resolution No. 5207 would approve the plans and specifications for Phase II of 21 the project and authorize the taking of bids fore the construction. He noted that the drawings were 22 submitted on January 20th for staff review. After Council approval,they will be issued on approximately 23 February 4th for bidding with construction beginning on approximately March 4, 1998. 24 25 MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Gunn to approve Resolution No. 5207,A Resolution Approving Phase 26 II Plans and Specifications and Authorizing the Taking of Bids for the Construction of the Mounds View 27 Community Center. 28 29 Council member Stigney noted that there had been a discussion on the proposed brick at a previous 30 meeting and it is his understanding that the selected brick will be different than that which is on the City 31 Hall building. He asked why they are not proposing to use the same brick. 32 33 Mr. Olson noted that the smooth surface proposed is easier to clean and that the color will match the brick 34 on the city hall building. Council member Stigney stated he would prefer to use the same. Other council 35 members stated they would rather use a brick which is easier to clean. 36 37 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 38 39 Mr. Whiting gave the council a brief update on the status of the roof at the community center. He noted 40 that after a drying period,the roof will be patched to hopefully alleviate any further leakage or damage. 41 Mr. Koopmeiners suggested that sand be put around the elevated membrane of the roof to help keep water 42 from the damaged areas. When asked about the roof damage, Mr. Olson stated it is his understanding 43 that the HVAC units were removed with a crane and therefore,he does not believe they would have 44 damaged the roof. 1110 45 46 F. Review and Approval of Job Description for Administrative Assistant to the City Administrator 47 Position. • Page 1 January 12, 1998 APPROVED Mounds View City Council PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA Regular Meeting January 12, 1998 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View,MN 55112 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:00 p.m.on January 12, 1998. 2. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor McCarty,Council members Koopmeiners, Gunn Quick and Stigney ALSO PRESENT: Chuck Whiting, Clerk Administrator Bruce Kessel, Finance Director Rick Jopke,Community Development Director Jim Ericson,Planning Assistant Cathy Bennett,Economic Development Director Bob Long,City Attorney Mayor McCarty noted that he would like to move the Agenda ahead to Item 4 at this time. 4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: A. Recognition and Appreciation for Economic Development Director: Mayor McCarty read and presented a plaque of Recognition and Appreciation from the City of Mounds View to Cathy Bennett,Director of Economic Development. On behalf of the City Council,he extended his sincere appreciation of her hard work and wished her the best of luck in her new endeavors. Ms.Bennett thanked the Council and noted that her years of service at Mounds View have provided her • with a lot of experience and she looks forward to keeping posted on the progress of development within the city. APPROVED • Page 3 January 12, 1998 Mounds View City Council MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to approve Resolution No. 5202,Reappointing Commission Members for Three-Year Terms Expiring December 31,2000. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 6. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: Mayor McCarty explained that this is the time for residents to address the council with concerns on items that are not on the Agenda. There were no questions or comments from the floor. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS: A. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 609,Authorizing the City Council of the City of Mounds View to set water rates and surcharges effective with the January 1998 billings. 1. Public Hearing: Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7:10 p.m. There were no questions • or comments from the public and Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 7:11 p.m. 2. Second Reading: Mr. Whiting read the new billing rates for each property class. 3. Consider Motion Adopting: MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 609 and to waive the reading. ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor McCarty aye Council member Koopmeiners aye Council member Gunn aye Council member Quick aye Council member Stigney aye Motion Carried - 5-0 B. First Reading of Ordinance No. 610,Adopting the 1997 Long Term Financial Plan. Mayor McCarty noted that a Public Hearing for this Ordinance has been set for January 26, 1998 at 7:05 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Gunn to approve the First Reading of Ordinance No. 610,Adopting the 1997 Long Term Financial Plan and to waive the reading. • ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor McCarty aye Page 5 January 12, 1998 APPROVED Mounds View City Council Development. He would like Council feedback on the pay range for the position,noting that he had provided the council with the pay range schedule from 1996. MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to approve the job description for Economic Development Coordinator and to authorize the Clerk Administrator to proceed with advertising and interviewing candidates for the position. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried E. Discussion of Other Staffing Options. Mr.Whiting noted that he had considered a number of options for the Human Resource Technician position and that a logical consideration would be to hire an Intern. He discussed the various options with his staff and how the Human Resource Technician position could be modified to an Intern position as it was several years ago. At some point,this position could be moved into an Assistant position to the Administrator with Human Resource duties and other city administrative duties. He asked for input from the council. Council member Koopmeiners asked if the city had looked into hiring a consulting firm. Mr.Kessel • stated they had talked with two firms who contacted the city,one of which was a placement firm. The other firm basically assisted with benefit management. Mr.Kessel did not think that this appears to meet the city's needs. A discussion followed. Council member Stigney stated he had questions as to the overall cost and funding for the position. He wondered if the city should consider a time-share position with another municipality. Mr. Kessel explained how the position would be funded. Mayor McCarty asked if staff anticipates exceeding the budget with the new position. Mr.Kessel did not expect that the 1998 budget would be affected. Council member Quick stated he is not in favor of considering a time-share position. He does not feel it would be beneficial to the city. Discussion followed in regard to the State's Pay Equity Standards. Mr. Kessel noted that changes in the next three years will have an impact on the city's compliance with these standards. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to authorize the Clerk Administrator to go forward with defining„advertising and interviewing for this position. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried F. First Reading of Ordinance No.611,An Ordinance Further Amending Cable Franchise Ordinance 606,Article II,section 4,Franchise Term. Mr. Whiting explained that last Fall the Council extended the Cable Franchise Agreement. The Cable Commission is in the process of negotiating the Franchise Agreement and the city is being asked to extend the original agreement to April 20, 1998 which should give them adequate time to complete the Page 7 41111 January 12, 1998 APPROVED Mounds View City Council Report of Attorney: Mr.Long gave an update on the airport issue. He explained that,on behalf of the City of Mounds View,he had asked MAC to delay voting on master plan for the Anoka Airport until an answer could be obtained as to whether or not MAC could proceed with their plan given the court order that exists governing the airport. He stated he feels residents should ask their legislatures to sponsor an amendment to that Section of the law that would make it clear that the airport runway was to stay at a 4,000 foot runway. MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Stigney to authorize Staff to work with the State Representative to develop legislation that would clarify law that would govern the development of the airport. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Report of City Administrator: Mr. Whiting noted that he had distributed a copy of a memo dated January 8th from the architect on the community center which laid out some issues that will need to be addressed at the next council meeting. He noted that some of the options that the council has been considering for the community center are stretching the discussed budget and these items will need to be discussed further before the bid specifications are put together. One alternative the council discussed was the heated sidewalk-an item which Mr. Whiting felt the council should talk about. It was the general consensus of the Council to drop the heated sidewalk from the bid specifications. Mr. Whiting provided a brief update on the Spring Lake Road project. He noted that staff will be putting together some type of model for the council to review in regard to MSA and street policies. A council work session was set up for Tuesday,January 27, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. Mr. Whiting noted the Work Session Retreat which will be held on January 24, 1998 at 8:30 a.m. at the Golf Course. Mayor McCarty noted that by Ordinance,the Human Rights Commission is required to meet once in the month of January and after that as deemed necessary by the Mayor. He asked that this be put on the Agenda for January 26, 1998. 9. NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION: February 2. 1997-6:00 p.m. NEXT COUNCIL MEETING:January 26. 1998- 7:00 p.m. 10. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Gunn to adjourn the City Council meeting at 8:20 p.m. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Respectfully submitted, Tamara D. Saefke Recording Secretary 5êi1 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES December 4, 1997 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Silvis called the meeting to order. ROLL CALL: Commissioners present included Silvis, Long, Stevenson, & Dentz. City Council Liaison Gunn was also in attendance. Commissioner Starr was working at Pinewood Book Fair. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Stevenson made a motion seconded by Commissioner • Long to approve the October 23, 1997 minutes. Motion passed unanimously. RING ROAD: Commissioners viewed the video tape of the Ring Road Public Information meeting with the Design Center for Urban Landscape from the University of Minnesota explaining the concept. The Commission discussed various impacts on the Parks System, specifically City Hall site. The Commission's concern for the soccer field and small youth ballfield was minimal because both field uses can be absorbed in the system. However, the large, lighted adult ballfield was of concern if vacated - for the simple reason that it would be more difficult to replace somewhere in the City and because it is a lighted field with extensive use and high demand. The Commission however, understood the benefit for the city regarding increase tax revenues. Possibilities were discussed of park bailfields being developed on the east side of Edgewood Dr. in the area of the Community Center. The Commission thought that the Ring Road concept should continue to be researched as the idea of a"heart of the city" is good and the idea of inter- neighborhood accessibility other than Highway 10 is also a benefit especially regarding pedestrian and bicycle transportation which is a means of travel by youth of the community. • SIGNAL LIGHT ONHWY 10 & EDGEWOOD DR.: The Commission reviewed the petition and letters exchanged between labor intense. Chemical usage for ice is discouraged due to the impact on Silver View Park pond. Motion was made by Commissioner Long and seconded by Commissioner Silvis to leave the path uncleared for winter time use of XC Skiing and sliding. Motion passed unanimously. OLD/NEW BUSINESS: Director Saarion reported that the warm weather is slowing down the process of establishing ice rinks - which are to open Saturday, December 20. Parks crew will be flooding as soon as the temperatures remain below freezing. The Parks crew will begin split shifts during school vacation so that flooding can occur during the night so that rinks can be open during the day. Director Saarion also reported disappointment that the City Newsletter is so late coming out- many November programs had to be canceled because residents did not receive the Newsletter in time to register before programs were to begin. This is frustrating because lots of time is put into making arrangements for programs and it takes just as much time to cancel arrangements - and there is no benefit to the resident. The City is in pursuit • of a Newsletter delivery system that is reliable and prompt. Commissioner Dentz reported on the selection process for the planning and design group for Highway 10 Corridor. Scott is the Parks and Recreation representative on this Hwy 10 Corridor Committee. Commissioner Dentz reported that Hoisington, Koegler Group, Inc are being recommended because they seemed to have creative ideas as well as good planning. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Long made a motion seconded by Commissioner Stevenson to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed unanimously. Item No. 5C Meeting Date: 2-9-98 Type of Business: CA WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council Item Title/ Subject: Licenses for Approval Date of Report: February 6, 1998 LICENSES FOR APPROVAL General/Commercial - expires June 30, 1998 Kraus Anderson Construction-New • . ...;: -em D • MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION&FORESTRY DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1998 SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION# 5210 APPROVING RICE CREEK NORTH REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN AS PREPARED BY RAMSEY COUNTY Ramsey County has sent copies of the master plan for the northern section of the Rice Creek Regional Trail for your review and ultimate approval. This master plan trail corridor begins at the lakes area in Centerville and continues through Anoka County open spaces through Ramsey County open spaces along Rice Creek, and again through Anoka County open space areas in Fridley. The corridor is to provide both canoeing opportunities and trail opportunities from Centerville lakes area to the Mississippi River. Because this corridor passes through several cities, each city is asked to review the plan and provide approval. This project is funded through Ramsey County initiatives with much of the funding grant monies through various Outdoor Recreation and Trail funding sources. The benefit to Mounds View residents is that they will have easy access to the corridor at County Road H and Old Highway 8. This is the location for a trail head. The entrance road is already paved leading to the proposed trailhead area(this was completed at the same time that Old Highway 8 was reconstructed). Mounds View residents will have opportunity to hike, bike or canoe the corridor going either east towards Centerville or west towards the Mississippi River. At this point an Anoka County trail system along the Mississippi River heading north to Lake George, Linwood and other connections are planned through a different project. While all these connections may take time to complete, the loop system is planned and segments of it are becoming a reality. This north corridor is one such segment. The Council reviewed the plan at the February 2 Work Session and did not have questions or concerns at that time. The Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed the plan. The Commission made a motion which was seconded and passed to recommend City Council to approve this master plan. I believe that this trail system will be a great recreational benefit to the residents of Mounds View. RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of Resolution# 5210 approving Rice Creek North Regional Trail Master Plan. i Item No. 74 Staff Report No. Meeting Date: February 9, 1998 • Type of Business: Council Business WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda; CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution No. 5209, Amending the Wastewater Operations Budget Date of Report: February 4, 1998 As presented at the February 2, 1998 Council Work Session, staff recommended hiring an entry level position in the Wastewater Division of the Public Works Department. At that time this recommendation received a majority vote to the proposal. The resolution for Council's consideration will approve the position and amend the Wastewater Operations Budget. For Council's consideration is Resolution No. 5209. Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works • C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\STAFFRPT\WWPOSIT.WPD\new position -78 City of Mounds View Public Hearing Notice The City of Mounds View will conduct a public hearing March 9, 1998 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Mounds View City Hall on street construction, maintenance and cost assessment policies. Residents are invited to address the Council at this hearing or send comments to City Administrator Chuck Whiting, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, 55112. The City Council is currently reviewing street construction, maintenance and assessment policies as a result of resident input during consideration of reconstruction of Spring Lake Road and nearby parts of County Road I. Road width, curb and gutter, storm sewer options, assessment policies, the use of municipal state aid funds and long term capital improvements planning have been and will be discussed during this public hearing. The City Council has set this public hearing to hear resident comments from throughout the City of Mounds View and on Spring Lake Road/County Road I. The Council may consider changes or alternatives to current policy which may impact residents throughout the community and on Spring Lake Road/County Road I. For more information, call the City Administrator's office at 717-4001. • • r -i-e,,r) 7c * INTER MEMO OF F ICE To: Administrator Whiting From: Mary Saarion Subject: Recommendation for advisory group for community center activities. Date: February 5, 1998 As requested I have prepared this proposal for advisory group participation and responsibility regarding operations and activities of the Mounds View Community Center. The Parks and Recreation Commission has the responsibility of advising Parks, Recreation& Forestry Department staff regarding issues of leisure recreational opportunities and use of City owned parks and recreation facilities. Both these responsibilities should carry over to new recreation facilities at the Community Center as well as leisure recreation activities that are being planned and held at the Community Center. I believe that the Parks and Recreation Commission 40 has done an excellent job of advising staff about the needs and desires of the community regarding recreational programs and facility needs and uses. Therefore it is my recommendation that the Parks and Recreation Commission continue to be the advisory group expanding their responsibilities to include the recreational and operational activities of the Community Center. In addition, I propose that a Mounds View Youth Council be organized for representation by the youth community concerning activities that they would like to see at the Youth Center of the Community Center. I believe that this would be a great learning experience as the youth would have an opportunity to work with Parks and Recreation staff in programming activities on a seasonal basis. This will give youth direct ownership of activities that are planned at the Community Center Youth Center. In addition, I would like to see the Youth Council participate in not only the planning but also the implementation of activities through volunteer activities. Youth could be responsible for checking participants in at the door, cleaning up after activities, decorating, preparing refreshment tables, seeking speakers or instructors, planning special event activities such as parties or dances, filling pop machines, etc. I believe that there could be many committees of the Youth Planning Council and therefore would prefer not to limit the Council with rules and regulations but instead work with all the numbers of youth that are interested in participating. I do not foresee additional burdens of another evening meeting because the Youth Council and committees would meet after school which is within normal work hours. Participation in the Youth Council and committees will, in itself, be a leisure recreational activity that will have many benefits for participating youth including mentorship opportunities, planning skills, supervisory and leadership activities, and way to exercise responsibility while ensuring that • their planning encompasses many youths' interests and experiences. In conclusion, I recommend that the Parks and Recreation Commission expand their MANAGEMENT MEETING MINUTES Wednesday,January 14, 1998 @ 10:00 AM I. Call to Order Meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. Present: Whiting, Ramacher,Jopke, Saarion, Kessel, Ulrich, Zikmund, Sanchez. Absent: Hammerschmidt, II. Department Reports - Zikmund reported that he would like to bring the new fire truck to the February 2 Work Session for council members to see. He stated that the old fire truck should sell in two to three months. Saarion reported that the Park and Recreation commission will review Rice Creek Trail at the next meeting and that she is working on marketing information for the Community Center. Saarion stated that the Parks and Recreation department will advertise for temporary office helper to start in March and will also seek an intern for the summer. Kessel reported that Tracy Juell in Public Works will take over the recycling responsibility. Ulrich discussed the fact that the City's storm water management system could have one regional pond area instead of five or six smaller ponds. Saarion stated that this could be incorporated into the LCMR grant she is working on. Jopke stated that if the pond was done right it could be a real benefit to the city. Whiting stated that this whole area needs to be researched. Ulrich reported a water pipe broke in the kitchen at the Community Center because of poor heat exchange. • Ramacher stated that he is still looking for a computer and that all performance appraisals for the Police Department will be completed by January 31. III. New Business - Staffing: Whiting stated that the council prefers hiring an EDA Coordinator that would report to the Community Development Director. The deadline for the position is February 20. Human Resource Technician/Administrative Assistant: Whiting passed out a job description and asked department heads for feedback. The consensus was to hire . 1998 Wage Schedule: Whiting stated that the 3% increase would be presented at the January 26 council meeting. IV. Adjournment - There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:30 a.m. Next meeting is Wednesday, January 21 at 10:00 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Tracy Sanchez, Recording Secretary INFORMATION ONLY CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW • COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed the claim numbers: 58233 through 58443 in the amount of$ 53,461.88 57544 through 57554 in the amount of$ 107,552.43 through in the amount of$ • through in the amount of$ TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 161,014.31 and has found said claims to be just and correct; It was moved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached list of claims dated 02/10/98 by the vote ayes nayes Mayor Clerk-Administrator • AGE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER P-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW /E OR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE OR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 24BUSBY , LINDA 58333 02y10/98 01/26/98 15.00 VENDOR TOTAL 15.00 8118 BASTIAN, JULIE 58334 02/10/98 01/26/98 15.00 VENDOR TOTAL 15.00 �0151 POTTER, KAREN 58335 02/10y98 01/29/98 20.00 VENDOR TOTAL 20.00 57308 CRONSTROM'S HTG & A/C* 58336 02/10/98 01/22/98 40.00 VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 .2110 JONES, JOE 58337 02/10/98 01 /22/98 32.00 VENDOR TOTAL 32.00 8201 CENTURY COLLEGE 58338 02/10/98 2058 01/28/98 833.33 VENDOR TOTAL 833.33 0102 HOMES, GLORIA 58339 02/10/98 01/22/98 9.00 VENDOR TOTAL 9 .00 ;0103 M & S PROPERTIES 58340 02y10/98 01/08/98 390.00 VENDOR TOTAL 390.00 PREINING, TRACI 58341 02/10/98 01/22/98 32.00 ����r VENDOR TOTAL 32.00 ]0201 JANICE SCHLATTER 58342 02/10/98 01/26/98 15.00 VENDOR TOTAL 15.00 30202 STEVENSON, KATIE 58343 02/10/98 01/22/98 8.40 VENDOR TOTAL 8 .40 40895 ACTION PRESS, INC. 58344 02/10/98 2700 01/19/98 173.86 VENDOR TOTAL 173.86 40905 ADDIE LANE FLORAL 58345 02/10/98 1128 01/02/98 37.28 58345 02/10/98 1152 01y26/98 37.28 VENDOR TOTAL 74.56 =‘-12700 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 58346 02/10/98 01/20/98 4.67 58346 02/10/98 01/20/98 27.82 VENDOR TOTAL 32.49 213940 ALL CITY ELEVATOR, IN* 58347 02/10/98 971394 01/02/98 150.00 VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 A.985 AMER LINEN & APPAREL * 58348 02/10/98 M54820120 01/20y98 207.98 VENDOR TOTAL 207.98 4111 . pAGE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS OUNDS VIEW :ENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT -1c-- AMERICAN OFFICE PRODU* 58349 02/10y98 317211 01/16/98 28.36 58349 02/10/98 316847 01/09/98 18. 19 58349 02/10/98 317100 01/16y98 6.74 VENDOR TOTAL 53.29 A5260 ANCHOR PAPER CO. 58350 02/10/98 106676101 01/27/98 246.51 58350 02/10/98 106269401 01/08/98 279.66 VENDOR TOTAL 526. 17 90109 B & L STEEL & TUBE, I* 58351 02/10/98 0008973-IN 01/07/98 6.39 VENDOR TOTAL 6.39 80411 BACON ELECTRIC 5, 352 02/10/98 0022005-IN 01/02/98 59.30 58352 02/10/98 0022002-IN 01/02/98 264.00 VENDOR TOTAL 323.30 80661 BATTERIES PLUS 58353 02/10/98 037346 01/27y98 157.35 VENDOR TOTAL 157.35 7i2000 BIFFS, INC 58354 02/10/98 8114822 01/02y98 74.59 58354 02y10y98 81116325 01/31/98 50.26 58354 02/10y98 81110921 10/31y97 3.56- 58354 02/10y98 81110922 10y31/97 1 .63- 58354 02/10/98 81110924 10/31/97 1 .63- 58354 02/10y98 81110925 10/31/97 1 .63- 58354 02/10y98 8111(0-/2410/31/97 3.56- 58354 02/10y98 81110927 10/31/97 3.56- III 58354 02/10/98 81110920 10/31/97 22.70- 58354 02/10/98 81110923 10/31/97 48.63- 58354 02/10/98 B1090094 09/15y97 14.36- VENDOR TOTAL 23.59 82005 BEISSWENGER'9 58356 02/10/98 511986 01/21/98 10.64 58356 02/10y98 515056 01/28y98 9.63 58356 02/10/98 508845 01/15/98 52.99 58356 02/10y98 495702 12/17/97 29.34 58356 02y10/98 498989 12y23/97 2.42 58356 02/10/98 498826 12/23/97 2.42 VENDOR TOTAL 107.44 52050 BEST BUY CO. , INC. 58357 02y10/98 0110116510 01/23/98 21 .28 58357 02/10/98 0110116754 01/26/98 31 .94 58357 02/10y98 110119478 01/02/98 74.54 VENDOR TOTAL 127.76 86820 BRENNAN, TIM 58358 02/10/98 01y27/98 34.53 VENDOR TOTAL 34.53 87180 BUMPER TO BUMPER 58359 02/10y98 D291914 01y27/98 142.29 58359 02/10/98 0291440 01/25/98 85.36 4111 ,AGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW P-C10-01 )ENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT •iENDOR 58359 02/10y98 D291926 01/27y98 10.78- 58359 02y10/98 D286533 01/08y98 68.43 VENDOR TOTAL 285.30 ;0470 CAPITOL COMMUNICATION* 58360 02/10/98 20852 01y23/98 30.00 VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 -32077 CENTRAL DATA SUPPLY C* 58361 02/10y98 156077 12/02/97 228.24 VENDOR TOTAL 228.24 :5996 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC 58362 02/10/98 0078542 01/07y98 71 .87 VENDOR TOTAL 71 .87 _;6000 COPY SALES, INC. 58363 02/10/98 058939 01/19y98 30.39 58363 02/10/98 059116 01y28y98 111 .51 58363 02/10/98 059139 01/29/98 8.20 58363 02/10/98 16280A 01/22/98 293.43 58363 02/10y98 058664 01/05/98 7.59 58363 02/10/98 058832 01/12y98 913.93 VENDOR TOTAL 1365.05 10501 DALCO 58364 02/10/98 926554 01/15/98 254.54 VENDOR TOTAL 254.54 .32 DES MOINES REGISTER 58365 02/10/9 9 8 01/18/98 34.46 41/0 VENDOR TOTAL 394.46 ]4850 DISH NETWORI( 58366 02/10/98 55449 01y19/98 279.88 VENDOR TOTAL 279.88 ]4895 DNR - WATERS 58367 02y10/98 766253 01/02/98 2148. 16 VENDOR TOTAL 2140. 11- -040n 148. 16]9400 DYNA-PA[ CORPORATION 58368 02/10y98 00000740 01y16/98 741 .20 VENDOR TOTAL 741 .20 :6895 FRIENDLY CHEVROLET GE* 58369 02110/98 126621 01/02/98 .81 58369 02/10/98 129156 01/19/98 21 .47 58369 02/10/98 106314 05y09/97 20.28 VENDOR TOTAL 42.56 :8950 FUEL OIL SERVICE CO. ,* 58370 02/10y98 21541 11y04y97 459.65 58370 02y10/98 21540 11/04/97 120.45 VENDOR TOTAL 580. 10 30150 0 T E DIRECTORIES COR* 58371 02/10/98 01y07/98 32.50 VENDOR TOTAL 32.50 35 GOODHUE COUNTY NATION*4110 58372 02/10y98 01y12/98 244.84 VENDOR TOTAL 244.84 . AGE ' 4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER p-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW ENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT )6 W GRAINGER INC 58373 02y10/98 497-152807-2 01/15/98 24.51 -- 58373 02/10/98 497-152800-7 01/13y98 24.51 VENDOR TOTAL 49.02 10885 HEALTH SERVICES/NORTH* 58374 02/10/98 4980026 01y20/98 109.44 VENDOR TOTAL 109.44 0021 INTERNET 58375 02/10y98 01y08/98 19.99 VENDOR TOTAL 19.99 .5180 IMPACT ERGONOMICS COR* 58376 02/10/98 8018 01y26/98 345.70 VENDOR TOTAL 345.70 ]8051 JUSTICE BROS. 58377 02/10y98 435147 01y20/98 512.56 VENDOR TOTAL 512.56 1034 KERN, DEWENTER, VIERE* 58378 02/10y98 23500 01/24/98 2000.00 VENDOR TOTAL 2000.00 0254 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES I* 58379 02y10y98 01/21/98 144.38 58379 02/10/98 01/21/98 1086.83 VENDOR TOTAL 1231 .21 .0605 LARSCO, INC 58380 02/10/98 0709 12y11/97 4317.30 VENDOR TOTAL 4317.30 18�N�'LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA C* 58381 02/10/98 4935 01/27/98 144.00 VENDOR TOTAL 144.00 3545 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSP* 58382 02y10/98 01/02/98 29.02 VENDOR TOTAL 29. 02 .6550 LUNDEEN, HERBERT 58383 02/10/98 52674 01/21/98 45. 75 VENDOR TOTAL 45. 75 10265 M P SIGN 58384 02y10/98 86508 01/13/98 262.28 VENDOR TOTAL 262.28 10330 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT I* 58.305 02/10y98 29801215 01/20/98 3715.79 VENDOR TOTAL 3715.79 10750 MASYS CORPORATION 58386 02/10/98 7603 02y01/98 623.69 VENDOR TOTAL 623.69 11001 MCI 58387 02/10/98 63352884 01/25/98 143.51 VENDOR TOTAL 143.51 |2055 MEDTOX LABORATORIES 58388 02/10/98 129712156 12/31/97 30.00 VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 410 . AGE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER 'P-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW ENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE 11/1 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 12164 METRO LEGAL SERVICES,* 58389 02/10/98 783278 01/13/98 12.00 VENDOR TOTAL 12.00 2444 MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOT* 58390 02/10/98 06146203 01/21/98 126.75 VENDOR TOTAL 126.75 2448 MIDWEST SPECIALTY SAL* 58391 02/10/98 7398 01/29y98 129.82 VENDOR TOTAL 129.82 13700 MINNEGASCO 58392 02/10y98 01/20/98 32.82 58392 02/10/98 01/20y98 23. 13 VENDOR TOTAL 55.95 14290 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCI* 58393 02/10y98 01y19/98 100.00 VENDOR TOTAL 100.00 i4992 MINN RECREATION & PAR* 58394 02/10/98 01/13/98 553.50 VENDOR TOTAL 553.50 14993 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER* 5839502y10/98 01y27y98 185.00 VENDOR TOTAL 185.00 4991, 410 STREET SUPT* 58396 02/10/98 01/28/98 50.00 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 4999 MINNESOTA STATE TREAS* 58397 02/10y98 01y16/98 345.92 VENDOR TOTAL 345.92 5175 MINNESOTA UC FUND 58398 02/10/98 01y21/98 4.30 VENDOR TOTAL 4.30 5491 MITCHELL REPAIR INFOR* 58399 02/10/98 RU655422 01/02/98 79.88 VENDOR TOTAL 79.88 15822 MORENO, KATRINA 58400 02/10/98 01/30/98 19.00 VENDOR TOTAL 19.00 5875 MORTON SALT 58401 02/10/98 728795 01/23/98 5014.53 VENDOR TOTAL 5014.53 16000 MOUNDS VIEW, CITY OF 58402 02/10/98 01y02y98 760.67 VENDOR TOTAL 760.67 16800 STATE CHEMICAL MFG CO 58404 02/10/98 01210849 01y22/98 136. 13 VENDOR TOTAL 136. 13 11126 NATIONAL INDEPENDENT * 58405 02/10/98 01/31/98 54.00 VENDOR TOTAL 54 .00 410 ' PAGE' 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER AP-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW vENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 4111 N NEW BRIGHTON, CITY OF 58406 02/10y98 01/16/98 4747.00 VENDOR TOTAL 4747.00 N2900 NIKE INC 58407 02y10/98 27528111 01705/98 38.93 VENDOR TOTAL 38.93 N3400 NORSEMAN AWARDS 58408 02y10/98 3466 01/06/98 104.37 VENDOR TOTAL 104.37 N3690 NORTH STAR TURF, INC 58409 02y10/98 161570 01/23y98 67. 11 VENDOR TOTAL 67. 11 N3714 NORTHERN ASPHALT CONS* 58410 02/10/98 19293 01/29y98 74.02 VENDOR TOTAL 74.02 N4000 NORTHERN SANITARY SUP* 58411 02/10y98 424025 01/06y98 115.77 VENDOR TOTAL 115.77 N4200 NORTHERN STATES POWER* 58412 02/10/98 579808665022 01y22y98 13.87 58412 02y10/98 322740983030 01/30y98 142.49 58412 02y10/98 691642583030 01y30y98 115.44 58412 02y10/98 493656813030 01/30/98 15.43 58412 02y10/98 794040397030 01y30/98 8.96 58412 02/10y98 842854514030 01/30/98 6.44 58412 02y10y98 943546782030 01/30y98 6.44 58412 02/10/98 085659018030 01/30y98 137.91 58412 02y10/98 840356809030 01y30/98 13. 13 411158412 02/10/98 177347877005 01/05/98 20.92 58412 02/10y98 309155315029 01/29y98 158.56 58412 02/10/98 088145798028 01/28y98 60. 14 58412 02/10/98 388457912029 01y29y98 1245.68 58412 02/10/98 903941195005 01/05/98 307.86 58412 02/10y98 336149673029 01y29/98 14.22 58412 02/10/98 365843297029 01/29/98 7.63 58412 02y10y98 341149882028 01y28/98 34. 18 58412 02/10/98 783550220029 01/29y98 909.86 58412 02/10y98 970652120365 01y07y98 45.58 VENDOR TOTAL 3284.74 07550 ORKIN EXTERMINATING C* 58415 02/10/98 02y01/98 27.68 VENDOR TOTAL 27.68 P4875 PRINTMASTER PRINTING 58416 02/10/98 25276 01/26/98 173.00 VENDOR TOTAL 173.00 P7900 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 58417 02y10/98 01/23y98 309.37 VENDOR TOTAL 309.37 R0729 RAMSEY CTY JUVENILE 0* 58418 02/10/98 02/03/98 40.00 VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 III1 . . `AGE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER iP-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW /ENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE •YJENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT l0865 RAMSEY COUNTY 58419 02/10/98 100575-40211 11/17y97 313.50 58419 02y10/98 00792(:,-57401 12y31/97 1 .35 VENDOR TOTAL 314.85 K0400 SAARION, MARY 58420 02/10/98 12/19/97 19.60 VENDOR TOTAL 19.60 ,0800 SAINT PAUL PIONEER PR* 58421 02/10/98 900677 01/18/98 193.25 58421 02y10/98 900690 01/18/98 225.06 VENDOR TOTAL 418.31 11000 SAM'S CLUB 58422 02y10/98 01/30/98 105.81 VENDOR TOTAL 105.81 :31002 SAM S CLUB 58423 02/10y98 000025 01y02/98 15.56 VENDOR TOTAL 15.56 11205 SCANTRON SERVICE GROU* 58424 02/10y98 10039357 01/22/98 144.54 VENDOR TOTAL 144.54 33225 SHORT ELLIOTT & HENDR* 58425 02y10/98 45208 01y29/98 465.28 58425 02/10/98 45207 01/29/98 2096.81 58425 02/10/98 44694 12/31/97 390.65 58425 02/10/98 44576 12/30/97 1033.63 1111 58425 02/10y98 44444 12/23/97 381 .69 58425 02/10/98 44098 11/26/97 1184.23 VENDOR TOTAL 5552.29 ,3300 SHRED-IT 58426 02/10/98 18841 02y04/98 49.95 VENDOR TOTAL 49.95 3545 SILUK, LARRY 58427 02/10/98 02y02/98 275.96 VENDOR TOTAL 275.96 )5605 SNYDER'S DRUG STORES,* 58428 02y10/98 01/23/98 15.82 VENDOR TOTAL 15.82 ;6250 SPRING LAKE PARK FIRE* 58429 02/10y98 01/16y98 376.25 VENDOR TOTAL 376.25 16301 STAGE ONE SUPPLY INC. 58430 02/10/98 6396 01/13/98 771 .59 VENDOR TOTAL 771 .59 37275 STILLE COMPANY 58431 02y10/98 1476 12/22/97 442.42 VENDOR TOTAL 442.42 s9650 SYSTEMS SUPPLY INC. 58432 02/10y98 001232 01y27y98 46.24 VENDOR TOTAL 46.24 1111 . 'AGE ' 8 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER \P-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW /2NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 4111 '8 TWIN CITIES SERVICE C* 58433 02/10/98 115438 01/22/98 49.99 VENDOR TOTAL 49.99 10303 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 58434 02/10/98 125144 01y14/98 85.00 58434 02/10/98 125143 01/14/98 85.00 VENDOR TOTAL 170.00 10400 U S WEST 58435 02/10/98 01y25/98 42.65 58435 02/10y98 01y25/98 41 .85 58435 02/10y98 01/13y98 313.20 VENDOR TOTAL 397.70 /2800 ULTRA RIBBONS, INC 58436 02/10y98 210225 11/26y97 265.90 VENDOR TOTAL 265.90 16000 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE* 58437 02/10/98 740119446 01y21/98 184.91 58437 02/10/98 740120419 01/28/98 124.69 VENDOR TOTAL 309.60 /6600 VOSS LIGHTING 58439 02/10/98 2010203-00 01/12/98 99.05 58439 02/10/98 2008793-00 01/02/98 94.79 VENDOR TOTAL 193.84 J0700 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BL* 58440 02y10y98 899-006296 01y29/98 1035.59 58440 02/10/98 899-008203 01y29/98 141 .37 58440 02/10y98 899-001087 01y02y98 73.89 1111 VENDOR TOTAL 1250.85 /1050 WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS 58441 02/10y98 13383 12/12/97 33.00 VENDOR TOTAL 33.00 /1919 WESTERN BANK 58442 02/10/98 12/31/97 50.00 58442 02/10/98 02/02/98 50.00 58442 02/10y98 12y31/97 1828.00 VENDOR TOTAL 1928.00 15705 WORD PERFECT 58443 02/10/98 2814288 01y21/98 17.97 VENDOR TOTAL 17 .97 GRAND TOTAL 53461 .88 IIII . 'AGE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE—PAID CHECF::: REGIS. =IP—C10-02 MOUNDS VIEW 'ENDOF; CHECK CHECKINVOICE INVOICE 4IVENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 111 119 WESTERN BANE:: * 0 01/2Q/Q8 01/29'f 3452. 10 h, 0 01/2Q/'")8 0 1/2'x/' ' 610.45 VENDOR TOTAL 404255. 8:30O SECRETARY OF STATE 57544 01 /20/Q8 01 /28/Q0 :.:5.00 VENDOR TOTAL :35.00 )0008 AARP 57545 '_18 208.00 VENDOR TOTAL 20P.00 -'7Q00 PUB EMPLOYEES RE:T l:REM* 57546 01./29/98 01/2'://c/8 5E:1,_,. 1Q 57547 01/2'.:1/Q8 01:2'7, 54.25 VENDOR TOTAL 587 .44 I1',1Q WESTERN BANE::: 57548 01 01/2Q/'"?0 67Q11 .70 57548 01/'2` /98 01/2Q/Q8 14434 .'7'8 vENDOR 4434. = - VENDOR TOTAL 34 344. _ _ 0082 ICE 1A RETIREMENT •TRUST* 5.754' 01/2Q/ 8 01/2' 'Q8 123.02 VENDOR TOTAL 12D.0-' 1341Q Ml:CHNA, PATRICIA 17550 O1/29/=%:E: 01/2°/Q0 10.00 VENDOR TOTAL 10,00 Ilk 't:} E I P 57553 01/29/'::8 01/2Q/°8 1.2741 .74 VENDOR TOTAL 12741 .74 8407 F'UBL_.I CORE', INC. 97554 01/-":)/Q8 01/28/Q8 150.00 VENDOR TOTAL 150.0C' GRAND TOTAL 107552. 43 1111 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1998 Meeting No. 50 AGENDA ROLL CALL: President McCarty, Vice President Koopmeiners, Commissioner Gunn, Commissioner Quick, Commissioner Stigney 1. AGENDA ADDITIONS: 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 12, 1998 -EDA Meeting Minutes 3. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: None 4. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of EDA Resolution No. 98-EDA82, Approval of Expenditure of TIF Pool Funds for Multi-Jurisdictional Remodeling Planbook. III5. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. Consideration of Resolution No. 97-EDA83 Approving the Amendments to the Housing Replacement Program. B. Consideration of Resolution No. 98-EDA84 Approving Authorization to Obtain an Appraisal of the Property at 7934 Woodlawn Drive (MVHRP). F. REPORTS G. ADJOURNMENT • UNAPPR OVED 1 PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW 2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 3 4 Meeting No.47 5 January 12, 1998 6 Mounds View City Hall 7 2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View MN 55112 8 *********************************************************************************** 9 10 CALL TO ORDER 11 12 The Economic Development Authority was called to order by President McCarty at 8:20 p.m. on January 13 12, 1998. 14 15 ROLL CALL 16 17 MEMBERS PRESENT: Duane McCarty, Sherry Gunn,Gary Quick,Roger Stigney,Roger Koopmeiners, 18 Clerk Administrator Chuck Whiting,Community Development Director Rick Jopke and City Attorney Bob 19 Long. 20 21 OTHERS PRESENT: None 22 23 1. AGENDA ADDITIONS: 24 25 None. 26 27 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 28 29 December 8, 1997: 30 31 MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Stigney to approve the minutes of the EDA Meeting on December 8, 32 1997 as presented. 33 34 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 35 36 3. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: 37 38 None. 39 40 4. CONSENT AGENDA: 41 42 No items on Consent Agenda. 43 44 5. COUNCIL BUSINESS: 45 46 A. Consideration of Resolution No. 98-EDA79,Approving the Appointment of the Economic 47 Development Authority Officers. 48 49 MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Stigney to Approve Resolution No. 98-EDA79,Approving the 50 Appointment of the Economic Development Authority Officers. • 51 52 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 53 UNAPPROVED EDA Meeting#49 1110 January 12, 1998 Page 3 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 1 3 \v.) ' / / /jeA4----) 4 Tamara D. Saefke 5 Recording Secretary 6 7 8 9 i i Item No. Th IIIMeeting Date: 2-9-98 Staff Report No. Type of Business: EDBA WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;EDBA:EDA Business Mounds View Economic Development Authority Staff Re ort To: Mounds View Economic Development Authority From: Steve Dorgan, Housing Inspector Item Title/Subject: Multi-Jurisdictional Remodeling Planbook Date of Report: February 5, 1998 SUMMARY At the City Council Work Session on February 2, 1998,the Council directed staff to proceed with the allocation of$5,000 from tax increment funds to participate with a consortium of other first tier suburban communities in the development of a remodeling planbook for the City of Mounds View. The City of Fridley will be administrating the development of the remodeling planbook. As part of participating with the suburban cities consortium,the City of Mounds View is required to execute 41) the attached Letter of Understanding (Exhibit B)with the City of Fridley. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED Approve EDA Resolution No. 98-EDA-82 to authorize a commitment to participate with the consortium of first tier suburban communities to develop a remodeling planbook and to approve the Letter of Understanding between Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority (contract holder representing the suburban communities consortium) and the Mounds View Economic Development Authority for the development of a remodeling planbook. \14 �_ Steve Dorgan _�k Housing Inspector 717-4023 Attachments: Exhibit A: Resolution No. 98-EDA-82 Exhibit B: Letter of Understanding between Mounds View EDA and Fridley HRA • C:\OFFICE\W P W IN\MYDOC\MV HRP\PLANB OOK.EDA $5,000 in tax increment funds to finance the costs in connection with the development of a 11111 remodeling planbook for the City and to execute the Letter of Understanding between the Mounds View EDA and the Fridley HRA. Adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Mounds View Economic Development Authority this 9th day of February, 1998. Duane McCarty,President ATTEST: Chuck Whiting, Executive Director • • 4111 page 2 Letter of Understanding CITY OF FRIDLEY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Lawrence R. Commers, Chairperson Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority William W. Burns, Executive Director Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority CITY OF Mounds View 4111 Duanne McCarty, President Mounds View Economic Development Authority Chuck Whiting, Executive Director Mounds View Economic Development Authority prepared by City of Fridley HRA 1/22/98 4111 3. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES Architects will submit invoices at the same time benchmark tasks are completed and submitted to the HRA according to the benchmark schedule in Exhibit A. However, the first benchmark payment will be made by the HRA when the invoice is presented following agreement signing. The HRA will issue the check within 30 working days of receipt of invoice. 4. PRODUCT Architects will provide the HRA with an iomega zip drive cartridge with the remodeling plan book fully designed in Quark printer ready. Architects will scan in all images. Assuming the product is published, the HRA will provide 25 copies of remodeling plan book free of charge. The HRA makes no representations as to timing. 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Architects shall select the means, method, and manner of performing the services herein in consultation with the HRA. Nothing is intended or should be 410 construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of copartners between the HRA and Architects or as constituting Architects as the agent, representative, or employee of the HRA for any purpose or in any manner whatsoever. Architects is to be and shall remain an independent contractor with respect to all services performed under this Agreement. Architects represents that it has or will secure at its own expense. all personnel required in performing services under this Agreement. Any and all personnel of Architects or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by this Agreement shall have no contractual relationship with the HRA, and shall not be considered employees of the HRA. Any and all claims that may or might arise under the Unemployment Compensation Act or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said personnel, arising out of employment or alleged employment, including, without limitation, claims of • discrimination against Architects, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of the HRA. Architects shall defend, indemnify, and hold the HRA, its officers, agents, and employees harmless from any and all such claims irrespective of any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission, or court. Such personnel or other persons shall neither require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights, or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the HRA, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, Workers' compensation, • Unemployment Insurance, disability, severance pay, and PERA. 2 • items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. b. Any material alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties hereto. 11. DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION a. If Architects fail to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fail to administer the work as to endanger the performance of this Agreement, this shall constitute a default. Unless the default is excused, the HRA may, upon written notice, immediately cancel the Agreement in its entirety. b. The HRA's failure to insist upon strict performance of any provision or to exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a relinquishment or waiver of the same, unless consented to in writing. Such consent shall not constitute a general waiver or relinquishment throughout the entire term of the Agreement. c. If the Agreement is canceled, Architects will be paid for percent of work completed to the date of cancellation. 12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION The HRA is managing the Contract in consultation with several cities as outlined in Exhibit C. From time to time, meetings shall be held between Architects, the HRA, and the cities identified in Exhibit C. 13. MEDIATION/ARBITRATION CLAUSE If a dispute arises out of or relates to this Agreement, or breaching of the Agreement, and if the dispute cannot be settled through direct discussions, the Architects and the HRA agree to first endeavor to settle the dispute in an amicable manner by mediation administered by the Mediation Center, Minneapolis, before resorting to arbitration. If mediation is unsuccessful, the dispute shall be settled by arbitration administered by the Mediation Center, Minneapolis. Architects and the HRA will each pay one-half the cost of mediation/arbitration. 14. NOTICES • Any notice or demand which must be given or made by a party hereto under the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing. 4 'y C4deactar and ya�tm tt t EXHIBIT A ROBERT GERLOFF RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTS Y927.5913 • 22 January 1998 Barbara Dacy Community Development Director 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 • Dear Barb: Enclosed is the most recent revision to our proposal. The Town Planning component 111 is eliminated and the "real price estimates" is listed as an alternate. The only fluid component of the proposal is the schedule will not start until the contract is signed. Hence it now begins in January, though if the contract is not signed until the end of February, that's when the schedule will kick in. If you have any more questions, feel free to call. You can also e-mail me at RobertGerloff@compuserve.com Also if possible I'd like to see a copy of the contract before the signing time. My fax is on a dedicated line 927-7301. Again, thanks for all your work on this--every day we get a little bit closer to actually beginning! Si erely, Robert Gerloff 4007 SHERIDAN AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55410 VOICE: 612/927.5913 FAX:612/927.7301 E-11111:CALL • HOUSE TYPE TWO TASKS: May (services the same as with other rouse .y,";e5) June meeting #5 meeting #6 meeting #7 benchmark#3:second design complete $12;5C0.00 HOUSE TYPE THREE TASKS: Juiy (services the same as with other "Dose c yes) August meeting #8 meeting #9 • meeting #10 benchmark#4:second design complete $12,5C0.00 CLOSURE TASKS: September mtg #11 with consortium on "yelios,, ^ages°content write introduction, acknowiledgemeres and index write "how to use this look" copy edit& proof all text meeting to discuss book design options [additional service:prepare "real"cost estimates] refine overall layout& design coordinate production of book meeting #12 turn over final book design to consortium (book i5 on a disk ready to print) (consortium to have book printed) October? unveil the book at an event coordinated by Kristi benchmark #5:project completion $12,500.00 CORE CONTRACT TOTAL: $60,000.00 • • EXHIBIT B RESOLUTION ND. 116 - 1988 RESOLUTION OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN EMPLOYMENT WHEREAS, the City of Fridley City Council acknowledges that equal opportunity employment for all persons is a fundamental human value; and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley does promote and encourage full realization of human rights within City employment; and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, declares that artificial barriers to employment, pursuant to M.S. 363.03, are unfair discriminatory practices; and WHEREAS, under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Section 363.073, businesses or firms which (a) have more than 20 full-time employees in Minnesota at any time during the previous 12 months, and (b) bid on State contract for goods and services in excess of $50,000 must have a Certificate of Compliance issued by the Commissioner of the Department of Human Rights. Certificates are issued to businesses or fisc that have an Affirmative Action Plan approved by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights for the employment of minorities, women and disabled persons; and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley intends to reinforce Federal merit standard principles and concepts by assuring that all segments of society have an • opportunity to enter public service on the basis of open competition and advance according to individual ability. IIINOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Fridley City Council reaffirms and declares the Affirmative Action Program of Fridley, dated December 19, 1988, to the extent that such declaration is reasonable and realistic and is not in conflict with applicable laws of State or Federal authorities: DECLARATION OF POLICY OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION The City of Fridley acknczledges that equal opportunity for all persons is a fundamental humanvalue. Consequently, it is the policy of the City to provide equal opportunity in employment and personnel management for all persons; to provide access to, admission to, full utilization and benefit of training and promotional opportunities without discrimination because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, public assistance status, veteran status, handicap or disability; and to otherwise promote full realization of human rights within the City to the extent permitted by law. To implement this policy, the City of Fridley requires that every person making application for, currently employed by, or applying for future vacancies in the employ of the City of Fridley will be considered on the basis of individual ability and merit, without discrimination or favor. In furtherance of this policy, the City of Fridley establishes an Affirmative Action Plan, providing for and assuring fair and equitable treatment in all phases•of public employment, including selection, sensation, benefits, training opportunities, promotions, transfers, layoffs, and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment. The concept of this affirmative action policy is consistent and fundamental to the maintenance of IIIeffective equal opportunity and shall be implemented as an integral part of the City of Fridley's personnel system. t i EXHIBIT C Brooklyn Park Columbia Heights Coon Rapids • Crystal Fridley Golden Valley Hopkins Maplewood Mounds View New Brighton New Hope Richfield Robbinsdale Roseville Shoreview South St. Paul St. Louis Park White Bear Lake • Item No. .54 . Meeting Date: 2-9-98 Staff Report No. Type of Business: EDBA WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;EDBA:EDA Business Mounds View Economic Development Authority Staff Re ort To: Mounds View Economic Development Authority From: Steve Dorgan, Housing Inspector Item Title/Subject: Housing Replacement Program Policy Amendment Date of Report: February 5, 1998 BACKGROUND At the last EDA meeting direction was provided by the commission to amend specific areas of the Housing Replacement Program policy. REOUESTED CHANGES 0 The following reflect specific changes requested by the EDA as interpreted by staff. The eliminated text is and the inserted text is underlined. Section G(Page 2): At least two characteristics noted in parts 1-4 of Section G be established to meet policy requirements. Section G#7 (Page 3): Tenant occupied properties may be considered for the HRP on a case-by-case basis provided that all other requirements are met. Section I#7 (Page#7): Program staff will negotiate the purchase of properties with either a buyer/developer or buyer/builder team. The EDA may choose to sell the property to a developer or builder without a buyer for sale on the open market. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED Review the requested changes and adopt the revised Housing Replacement Program Policy with amendments by approving EDA Resolution No. 98-EDA-83. 1 Alt Steve Dorgan Housing Inspector 717-4023 Attachments: Exhibit A: MVHRP Draft Policy Amendments • Exhibit B: Resolution: 98-EDA-83 C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\MYDOC\MVHRP\CCMEM2 2.HRP • City of Mounds View 0 Housing Replacement Program Page 2 F. Publicizing the Program; Making Application 1. EDA staff, or their appointee(s) ("Program Staff"), will solicit participants by direct mail, advertisement, or other method. The number of applications accepted for participation in the Program will be determined by the availability of personnel and financial resources. 2. Participation in the Program must be on a voluntary basis. Interested participants must be able to furnish proof of ownership of the property, and are required to respond to the EDA solicitation in writing, with a letter indicating: a: For Option 1: (Sale of Property to EDA): (1) An interest in selling their property to the EDA. (2) A willingness to waive relocation benefits. (3) Statement of tenant interest in the property at the time of offer. (4) Consent to the release of relevant information to potential developers and end buyers. • b. For Option 2 (Funding for Demolition): (1) An interest in obtaining funding for demolition from the EDA to replace existing housing with standard housing meeting EDA guidelines. (2) Willingness to hold the EDA harmless for demolition activities (3) Willingness to enter into a legal development agreement with the EDA regarding redevelopment of the property 3. Individuals who have indicated an interest in participating shall be contacted by Program Staff to inform them of the estimated project time line and to obtain complete information on the items noted under F.2. above. G. Property Eligibility Criteria Program Staff shall evaluate each property for which an application is received to determine its eligibility for the Program based on the criteria in this section. Program Staff shall prepare property fact sheets for each property for which owners have expressed an interest in participating in the Program, and shall make a drive by inspection. Properties will be evaluated based on the following criteria outlined below. To be eligible for participation, the house on the property must have at least-ene two of the characteristics noted in 1, 2, 3 or IIII 4 below. 2 City of Mounds View • Housing Replacement Program • Page 4 2. Properties with the lowest values and poorest visible conditions will be considered first. 3. Properties should be equally distributed by location and value throughout the City when possible, and provide a viable financial mix of properties to support Program financial requirements. I. Option 1: Acquisition of Property by EDA 1. Blight Qualification: Once an offering letter is received from the interested participant, Program Staff shall arrange, by appointment, an inspection of the interior of the home to establish blight qualification as outlined in Section G. The following information will also be obtained during the inspection: a. Demolition information for estimating demolition credit to builder. b. A determination as to the existence of any hazardous materials on the property. • This includes: (1) a visual inspection (2) a statement from the interested participant regarding any knowledge of the property's use for production, storage, deposit, or disposal of any toxic or hazardous wastes or substances or asbestos products whatsoever, during the time the interested participant owned the property and prior to the date of interested participant purchased property. Properties with environmental problems or hazards may be considered if the purchase price is reduced sufficiently to cover increased site clearance and preparation costs. If a property meets the blight test, acquisition procedures can continue. If the blight test cannot be met, the interested participant will be notified in writing indicating the reasons why the property cannot be considered for acquisition. 2. Need for Variances: If a variance is required to redevelop the property, the EDA may, at its sole discretion, choose not to acquire the property. This determination will be made • based on the project time lines, available resources, and availability of other properties which do not require a variance. If the EDA chooses to pursue a variance to enable the acquisition of the property, an application shall be filed following the usual procedures. If a variance is not approved, the property cannot be considered for acquisition. • 4 City of Mounds View 11111 Housing Replacement Program Page 6 e. Following EDA authorization of these agreements, interested participants and/or Program Staff will be requested to assemble and supply all required documentation prior to closing as outlined below. (1) An Abstract or RPA (as applicable) must be furnished to the Program Staff to facilitate the rendering of a title opinion. The interested participant will bear the cost of updating the Abstract or RPA as part of the closing procedures. (2) EDA Legal Counsel will be responsible for having the Abstract or RPA updated and will provide Program Staff and interested participant with a written opinion of title. EDA Legal Counsel will also secure title insurance. (3) If the title opinion indicates the property has a marketable title, purchase procedures will continue. If the title opinion does not indicate a marketable title, the EDA, at its sole discretion, may choose not to acquire the property. The EDA may determine remedies and evaluate their resolution, including the additional time and expense to provide a marketable title. The EDA may proceed to correct title deficiencies to continue the purchase of the property dependant upon the additional time and expense incurred. (4) Simultaneously with the title opinion, an environmental evaluation may be obtained from an independent environmental engineering firm or other firm performing such service. If environmental hazards are found on the site, the EDA may choose not to acquire the property. f. The seller must be prepared to vacate the property on the day of closing unless other arrangements have been made with Program Staff. g. If the interested participant decides not to sell the property after execution of the purchase agreement then the interested participant must provide the EDA with the following: (1) A letter expressing their desire not to proceed with selling the property. (2) The full amount of earnest money received upon execution of the • purchase agreement. 6 City of Mounds View 0 Housing Replacement Program • Page 8 of new taxes generated based on the construction of replacement cost. 5. Demolition Contract: The interested participant must obtain three estimates for demolition which will assist in determining the amount of demolition funds to award for the project. The chosen demolition contractor must be able to meet project deadlines as outline by Program Staff. The demolition contractor will be required to obtain all necessary City permits and pay applicable fees. Overall demolition supervision will be provided by a designated Program Staff in conjunction with the interested participant. Economic Development Authority By: III Its President By: Its Executive Director Revised: February/ 1998 • N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\MVHRP\HRP1_98.WPD 8 Item No. 56 • Meeting Date: 2-9-98 Staff Report No. Type of Business: EDBA WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;EDBA:EDA Business Mounds View Economic Development Authority Staff Re ort To: Mounds View Economic Development Authority From: Steve Dorgan, Housing Inspector Item Title/Subject: MVHRP - Proposal for Appraisal of 7934 Woodlawn Drive Date of Report: February 5, 1998 SUMMARY Staff has recently received a letter from Rebbeca Mendelsohn, owner of 7934 Woodlawn Drive, offering her property for sale to the Economic Development Authority(Exhibit A). The property is located just north of Hillview Road on the west side of Woodlawn Drive (see location map Exhibit B). The proposed property is currently vacant and is listed on the market by a real estate company. Staff has completed an inspection of the proposed property to verify the eligibility as outlined in the Housing Replacement Program (HRP)policy. Item G of the HRP policy states: 41 G. Property Eligibility Criteria P g tY Program Staff shall evaluate each property for which an application is received to determine its eligibility for the Program based on the criteria in this section. Program Staff shall prepare property fact sheets for each property for which owners have expressed an interest in participating in the Program, and shall make a drive by inspection. Properties will be evaluated based on the following criteria outlined below. To be eligible for participation, the house on the property must have at least one of the characteristics noted in 1, 2, 3 or 4 below. *1. Substandard as to condition, size or usage. *2. Obsolete and having a faulty design for block and area in which it is located. *3. Deterioration which has caused blight to other adjoining properties. 4. Detrimental to the safety or health of abutting properties in the block. Staff has determined that the subject property meets the characteristics as noted in item 1,2, and 3. Because the property meets at least 2 of the 4 outlined criteria, it must also meet item numbers 5-8 in Section G of the policy to be considered for purchase by the EDA. These items are as follows: *5. A geographic mix of properties is achieved. *6. The site can be developed with a single family home within city code requirements, including zoning and conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The property may be considered if a variance can be obtained(see 410 Section I, Item 2.). *7. The property must be owner-occupied or vacant before the owner makes application to the Program. Non-homesteaded vacant property will be considered for acquisition. Tenant-occupied properties will be considered by the EDA on a case-by-case basis. EXHIBIT A Rebecca Mendelsohn • , 7934 Woodlawn Ave. Mounds View, MN 55112 771-9386 Steve Dorgan City of Mounds View 'January 19, 1998 Mr. Dorgan: I am writing to state that I am willing to participate in the Housin=g Replacement Program. I am interested in selling my house, located at 7934 Woodlawn Rvcime under option 1 of your proposal (sale of property to EDA.) I am willing to waive my relocation rights, as per said proposal. I am currently the sole holder of the title to this property. I also consent to the release of any relevant information to potential developers and end buyers. I look forward to working through further negotiations with you. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at the above listed phone number, or at 785-7391 between 8:00am and 5:00pm. Sincerely, • Rebecca M. Mendelsohn 1/21 .et,r., .s,#r.�► /A.J, 5,0!ca_ 6 F op rro•,l Z j Zh., Dew•to(.►rt oAJ ta•:k y pre;.J - en.414„xz/ . Z' Ar+-. S o r re-, 'lb SA, tX AA-' • K4fs t• rr Carv�T 'CA -Alewc;,4 it) - 7:1,•%s D'aec 43-e_.4 mae_ O cti/L Fee, uNp aJ, 7 do.<.e G,.G1f. -dry EXHIBIT C RESOLUTION NO. 98-EDA-84 MOUNDS VIEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING EXPENDITURE OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS FOR APPRAISAL OF 7934 WOODLAWN DRIVE FOR CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASE BY 1HE EDA It is hereby resolved by the Board of Commissioners(the"Board")of the Mounds View Economic Development Authority(the "Authority")as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.10 The Authority has the powers provided in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134 and 469.090 to 469.108 (collectively,the "Act"). 1.02 Pursuant to and in furtherance of the objectives of the Act,the Authority has undertaken a program to promote development and redevelopment of certain land within the City of Mounds View and in this connection is engaged in carrying out the Mounds View Economic Development Project(the "Project")within the City. 1.03 There has been approve pursuant to the Act a Project Plan for the Project. 1.04 The redevelopment and development of property within the Project by private developers are stated objectives of the Project Plan. • 1.05 In order to achieve the objectives of the Project Plan,the Authority has determined to provide substantial aid and assistance through the financing of certain of the public costs of development. 1.06 The Authority desires to evaluate the acquisition of 7934 Woodlawn Drive for the redevelopment of the property as outlined in the Housing Replacement Program and it is deemed necessary the expenditure of a maximum of$600 of tax increment funds for an appraisal of this property to accurately negotiate a purchase price. Section 2. Resolved. 2.01 The Board hereby determines that the Authority's authorization of Tax Increment Funds for an appraisal would be a furtherance in the objectives of the project plan an will help realize the public purpose of the Act. Adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Mounds View Economic Development Authority this 9th day of February, 1998. • Duane McCarty, President A 1-1'EST: • Chuck Whiting, Executive Director