HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1998/03/09 ‘R)
• CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNCIL AGENDA
MONDAY,MARCH 9, 1998
7:00 PM
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL: McCarty, Stigney, Koopmeiners, Quick, Gunn
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular meeting of February 23, 1998
4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
5. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approve Just and Correct Claims
B. Acceptance of Advisory Commission Minutes
1. Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes -January 22, 1998
C. Licenses for Approval:
General/Commercial - Sysco Minnesota-Expires 6/30/98 New
D. Set a Public Hearing for 7:05 PM on Monday, March 23, 1998, to Consider
Ordinance No. 612, Relating to Noise Control Regulations.
E. Set a Public Hearing for 7:10 PM on Monday, March 23, 1998, to Consider
Ordinance No.613 , Relating to Animals.
6. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR
A. Citizens: Before speaking must give their full name and address for the minutes.
7. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. Consideration of Resolution No. 5212, a Resolution Approving the Final Plat for
Silverview Estates PUD.
B. Public Hearing (7:10 p.m.) Consider licenses for 2400 Highway 10, doing
business at Donatelles:
• 1. Public Hearing on transfer of on-sale liquor license
2. Consider transfer of liquor license from Donatelle's Inc. (Edward
Donatelle) to 2400 Highway 10,Inc. (Jeffrey Weyek) - expires 6/30/98
3. Consider issuance of an amusement center license and associated
amusement devices licenses - expires 12/31/98
• 4. Consider issuance of a restaurant license - expires 12/31/98
• MEMO March 6, 1998
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator
Re: March 9, 1998 City Council Meeting
We have some real business to take care of Monday evening, so it should be a good meeting. Here
is a summary:
Item 5D and E-Setting Hearings for Noise Ordinance and Animal Ordinance: The settings of
these two hearings pertain to the ordinance revisions the Chief of Police discussed with the Council
at last Monday's work session. These hearings will be considered the first reading of these ordinance
changes.
Item 7A-Silverview Estates PUD Final Plat Resolution: Rick Jopke's report will reviews this
item.
Item 7B-Donatelles' Hearings and Actions: For those maybe not aware, Donatelles is selling to
another restaurant. The actions under this item are meant to facilitate that sale. Bruce will review
• the particulars Monday evening.
Item 7C - 7:30 p.m. Public Hearing on Streets, Construction and Assessment Policies: Mike,
Bruce and I will be working Monday in preparation for the hearing in the evening. Mike has
enclosed the returned surveys from Council members on the options for our policies. Also,through
my instruction, Barry Peters of SEH was asked to put some figures to different options stemming
from the Spring Lake Road project. Mike,Bruce,Barry, Steve Campbell and myself of course will
be present for discussion during the hearing. Since it is not entirely clear as to the purpose for this
meeting, it may be best to state at the opening that the hearing is intended to engage residents of the
community in a discussion as to their feelings on streets, assessments and affordability of a street
replacement program. It may also be beneficial to state that no conclusion will occur because of the
meeting, and none is intended until further deliberation on options occurs. This, it appears to me,
will take us into the summer at best and probably should be cleared up before the 1999 budget gets
set.
As for the Council surveys,just to reiterate staff intentions behind doing this, it is thought that the
survey questions may make it easier to sort out options which policies are based on, and then move
towards looking at the possible impacts of changes those answers would suggest if policies were
changes. It is complicated,but perhaps in this fashion a movement away from current policies could
be pieced together.
• Item D-Consideration of Signalization at Xylite and County Road J: Mike will report on this
Monday evening.
Page 1
• February 2fe;' councii
998
Mounds VUNIAPPROVED
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
9 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
10 RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA
11
12 Regular Meeting
13 February 23, 1998
14 Mounds View City Hall
15 2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View,MN 55112
16 **********************************************************************************
17
18 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER:
19
.
20 The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:00 p.m. on February 23,
21 1998. {
22
23 2. ROLL CALL:
24
25 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor McCarty,Council members Koopmeiners,
26 Quick,Gunn and Stigney
27
28 ALSO PRESENT: Chuck Whiting,Clerk Administrator
29 Rick Jopke, Community Development Director
30 Bob Long,City Attorney
31
32 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
33
34 A. Regular Meetings of February 9, 1998.
35
36 Council member Stigney noted two changes to the minutes. Page 3,Line 9 should include the number of
37 man hours to clean the city's sanitary sewer system. Additionally,Line 14 should be changed to read"not
38 eligible to retire until 2000 • ' m.
39
40 MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Koopmeiners to approve the Minutes of the February 23, 1998 City Council
41 Meeting AS AMENDED.
42
43 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
44
•45 4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
46
47 None.
k
Page3APPRovi�
• February 23, 1998 ,,
Mounds View City Council
1 With no further comments or questions from the Council,Mayor McCarty took this opportunity to thank
2 Ms. Gaertner,Mr.Rhodes and Mr.Zdrazil for their attendance and for the valuable information they
3 provided.
4
5 8. REPORTS:
6
7 Council member Stigney stated he has received several calls from residents in regard to the Nuisance letter
8 that they received. Mr.Whiting noted that this is in reference to possible violations of car parking. Staff
9 is trying to respond to complaints that have come in and is going out to identify violations. Letters were
10 sent out to possible violators and were not meant to imply that they are defmitely in violation. He noted
11 that this will be put on the agenda for the next Council Work Session for further discussion.
12
13 Mayor McCarty noted a correction to a report which appeared in the Focus Newspaper. He proceeded to
14 read verbatim what was said at the last Council meeting to Ms.Haake and the citizens group in regard to
15 the way they conducted their input in the Spring Lake Road/County Road I Improvement Project and his
16 appreciation. He proceeded to read the report as it appeared in the Focus,noting that it the report was
17 neither accurate nor appropriate.
18
19 Attorney Long gave an update on the Anoka County Airport issue. He noted that staff had directed him to
•20 pursue legislation regarding the Anoka County Airport runway extension issue. There was a House
21 hearing,but it lost with a vote of 11 to 7. He noted that this legislation prompted discussion and may have
22 set some groundwork for future policy sessions. He explained that it appears that there could be many
23 other communities experiencing the same problems with MAC. He noted that the Council should begin
24 thinking about what steps they may want to take next.
25
26 9. NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION:March 2.1998-6:00 p.m.
27 NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: March 9. 1998- 7:00 p.m
28
29 10. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor McCarty adjourned the City Council meeting at 7:55 p.m.
30
31 Respectfully submitted,
32
33 \j/e/AXalit-a_j >1-61667
34
35 Tamara D. Saeflce
36 Recording Secretary
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
11046
47
34 •
• P 1
Februaryage 9, 1998 APPROVED
Mounds View City Council
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
February 9, 1998
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View,MN 55112
**********************************************************************************
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER:
• The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:00 p.m. on February 9, 1998.
2. ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor McCarty,Council members Koopmeiners,
Quick,Gunn and Stigney
ALSO PRESENT: Chuck Whiting,Clerk Administrator
Mary Saarion, Director of Parks&Recreation
Rick Jopke, Community Development Director
Steve Dorgan,Housing Inspector
Bob Long,City Attorney
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
A. Regular Meetings of January 26, 1998.
MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Stigney to approve the minutes of the January 26, 1998 City Council Meeting
as presented in writing.
VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
Mayor McCarty gave the Mayor's State of the City Address,providing a summary of the city's progress
over the past year in terms of development,the status of the city's community center, implementation of
various local housing programs, administrative changes- which have ultimately resulted in lower
administrative costs, and the city's continued active involvement in the issues relating to the Blaine/Anoka
Page 3APPROVD
• February 9, 1998 E
Mounds View City Council
Wendy Marty,2626 Louisa Avenue,asked if an Environmental Work Assessment has been completed on
the theater property. Mr.Jopke explained that if one is required,it will be completed.
Z COUNCIL BUSINESS:
A. Consideration of Resolution No.5209,Amending the Waste water Operations Budget.
Mr.Mike Ulrich,Director of Public Works,explained that this item was discussed at the last council work
session. He noted that the current state of the city's sanitary sewer system requires more man hours than
what is available to clean and cannot be met with the current staffing level. Staff is recommending a
budget amendment in the amount of$29,940.to fund an entry level position in the waste water division.
Council member Stigney stated he feels it is premature to fill the position,considering that the person will
not eligible to retire until 2000. Council member Quick stated he feels it is necessary to hire someone now
to give them adequate time to learn the job and be fully knowledgeable of it before the retirement of the
other employee. Council member Stigney responded that he does not believe it takes two years to train
someone for the position and that he would support a one-year training period.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Approve Resolution No. 5209,Amending the Waste water
• Operations Budget.
VOTE: 4 ayes 1 nay(Stigney) Motion Carried
B. Set a Public Hearing Monday,March 9, 1998 at 7:30 p.m.in the City Council Chambers at
Mounds View City Hall on Street Construction,Maintenance and Cost Assessment Policies.
Barbara Haake,3024 County Road I,on behalf of a group of citizens, expressed the need to change the
city's current road policy and respectfully requested that the council consider delaying the street
improvement project on Spring Lake Road/County Road I until the 1999 construction season. She
proceeded to summarize various concerns residents in the project area had expressed in regard to the
current road policy,noting that these are items which they would like to discuss,have answered and
considered before their road improvement project proceeds.
Council member Gunn stated part of the problem she sees happening is that there are so many options,
there is no starting point. Therefore,it would be her recommendation that a starting point be established
as follows: a 26 to 28 foot road with curb and gutter,storm sewer where needed,no sidewalk,turn back
funds be applied to the project and then divide the cost of the project to assess.
•
Council member Stigney stated he would recommend using Ms. Haake's letter, obtain answers to the
questions addressed therein,and use that as a starting point.
Mayor McCarty asked what will be discussed at the Public Hearing.
Mr. Whiting explained that staff has met and discussed how to frame various options for the City Council
• and residents to consider. He noted that the city is limited by time and money to allow the possibility of
exploring all of the options,however they hope to break down the viable options for the road itself,the
storm sewer,holding ponds,and to review the policies which will need to be changed in regard to
APPROVED
Page 5
• February 9, 1998
Mounds View City Council
Attorney Long gave a brief update on the Anoka/Blaine Airport issue,noting that a hearing has been
scheduled for Thursday,February 12 at 12:30.
Council member Stigney, in response to the concerns about the city's compensation policy,stated he would
like to discuss this at the Council's next work session.
MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/McCarty to defer discussion of proposed compensation policy changes to
the Council Work session on March 2, 1998.
VOTE: 3 ayes 2 nays(Koopmeiners/Quick) Motion Carried
9. NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION:March 2. 1998-6:00 p.m.
NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: February 23. 1998- 7:00 p.m.
10. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor McCarty adjourned the City Council meeting at 9:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
J / V 4z /IeA. —
• Tamara D. Saefke
Recording Secretary •
S.� .
•
• CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
•
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT
CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City Council of Mounds View,pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and;
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the claim numbers:
58582 through 58682 in the amount of$ 76,405.90
57567 through 57582 in the amount of$ 107,022.24
through in the amount of$
• through in the amount of$
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 183,428.14
and has found said claims to be just and correct;
It was moved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached
list of claims dated 03/10/98 by the vote ayes nayes
Mayor
Clerk-Administrator
i-HuL �
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-C10-01
MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE
NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT
80115 BCA FORENSIC SCIENCE * 58597 03/10/98 B02099821 02/24/98 200.00
III� � VENDOR TOTAL 200.00
B0411 BACON ELECTRIC 58598 03y10y98 0022096-IN 02/23/98 . 441 .50
VENDOR TOTAL 441 .50
80661 BATTERIES PLUS 58599 03y10/98 D38614 02/16/98 60.69
VENDOR TOTAL 60.69
52005 BEISSWENGER'S 58600 03/10/98 526980 02/24/98 14.87
58600 03y10/98 521054 02y11y98 13.46
58600 03/10/98 518579 02/05/98 21 . 16
58600 03/10/98 526073 02/24/98 9.64
58600 03/10/98 521343 02/12/98 18.51-
58600 03/10/98 518604 02/05/98 9.47-
58600 03/10/98 526405 02/25/98 15.95
58600 03/10/98 523361 02/17/98 10.64
58600 03/10y98 525748 02/23/98 24. 15
58600 03/10/98 524511 02/20/98 30.54
VENDOR TOTAL 112.43
32050 BEST BUY CO. , INC. 58602 03/10/98 0110029322 02/08/98 107.54
VENDOR TOTAL 107.54
34000 BORDER STATES ELECTRI* 58603 03/10y98 02168-691387 02/16/98 732. 19
VENDOR TOTAL 732. 19
�����
37��� BUDGET HELPER 58604 03/10/98 02/16/98 944.00
VENDOR TOTAL 944.00
37180 BUMPER TO BUMPER 58605 03/10y98 D294959 02/13/98 68.32
VENDOR TOTAL 68.32
05400 LEE COLLINS LIMITED 58606 03/10/98 00010844 02y12/98 117,39
VENDOR TOTAL 117.39
05994 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC 58607 03/10/98 0082474 02/17/98 22.47
VENDOR TOTAL 22.47
06000 COPY SALES, INC. 58608 03/10/98 16539A 02/18/98 45.47
58608 03/10/98 059543 02/20/98 30.39
VENDOR TOTAL 76.06
'6025 COTTENS INC 58609 03/10/98 257105 02/18/98 52.23
VENDOR TOTAL 52.23
]0700 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMEN* 58610 03/10/98 92792 02/17/93 375.58
VENDOR TOTAL 375.58
34850 DISH NETWORK 58611 03/10/98 02/21/98 5.34
���u
���
.
.
Ab±. 4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
7--C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW
=NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE
NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT
05 ARMON AUTOGLASS 58627 03y10/98 210083951 02/18/98 6.00
��, VENDOR TOTAL 6.00
0821 HAWKINS WATER TREATME* 58628 03/10/98 47665 02/16/98 1560.65
VENDOR TOTAL 1560.65
4986 HOFFMAN FILTER SERVlC* 58629 03/10/98 12672 02/24/98 38.00
VENDOR TOTAL 38 .00
4995 HOISINGTON KOEGLER OR* 58630 03/10/98 02y12/98 1112. 16
VENDOR TOTAL 1112. 16
5310 INDEPENDENT DELIVERY * 58631 03/10/98 009359 02/26/98 267.85
VENDOR TOTAL 267.85
5454 INNOVATIVE IMAGES 58632 03/10/98 01/20/98 90.00
VENDOR TOTAL 90.00
1000 KENNEDY & GRAVEN 58633 03/10/98 21142 01/12/98 4071 .40
VENDOR TOTAL 4071 .40
1991 KESSB-, BRUCE 58634 03/10y98 03/02/98 145.30
VENDOR TOTAL 145.30
)245 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES %* 58635 03/10/98 02/19/98 180.23
411 VENDOR TOTAL 180.23
)254 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES I* 58636 03/10/98 02/18/98 2399.77
VENDOR TOTAL 2399.77
)500 LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER * 58637 03/10/98 02/26/98 135.00
VENDOR TOTAL 135.00
870 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA C* 58638 03/10/98 02/23y98 15.00
58638 03/10/98 02/23/98 15.00
58638 03/10/98 02/18/98 303.20
VENDOR TOTAL 333.20
871 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES I* 58639 03/10/98 68115/68116 02/26/98 23481 .00
VENDOR TOTAL 23481 .00
1320 LIGHTNING PRINTING 58640 03/10/98 107795 02/12/98 108.20
VENDOR TOTAL 108.20
545 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSP* 58641 0:3/10/98 01/30/98 230.47
58641 03/10/98 02/02/98 232.80
58641 03/10/98 022896-00007 02/16/98 232.80
VENDOR TOTAL 696.07
Huk- IL:.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-C10-01
MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE
NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT
P3 PIPELINE SUPPLY , INC 58657 03/10/98 S1235978.001 02/18/98 31 . 40
�� VENDOR TOTAL 31 .40
P8000 PUBLIC SECTOR JOB BUL* 58658 03/1O/98 2/10/98 22.00
VENDOR TOTAL 22.00
R0845 RAMSEY COUNTY 58459 0:3/10/98 F13625-43118 02/12/9:3 408.00
. VENDOR TOTAL 408.00
R5606 ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTA* 58660 03/10/98 120423 02y19/98 17.50
VENDOR TOTAL 17.50
S0800 SAINT PAUL PIONEER PR* 58661 03/10/98 906094 02/07/98 549.36
VENDOR TOTAL 549.36
S0801 SAINT PAUL PIONEER PR* 58662 03/10/98 01/26/98 21 .45
VENDOR TOTAL 21 .45
S0802 SAINT PAUL PIONEER PR* 58663 03/10/98 585942 02/01/98 438.42
58663 03/10/98 906094 02/07/98 438.42
VENDOR TOTAL 876.84
S1300 SCHWAAB, INC 58644 03/10/98 S110104 02/17/98 7.89
58664 03/10/98 L855713 02/16/98 34 .09
58664 03/10/98 L855714 02/16/98 29.83
. VENDOR TOTAL 71 .81
33225 SHORT ELLIOTT & HENDR* 58665 03/10/98 45638 02/25/98 152.71
58665 03/10/98 45497 01/31/98 6906.45
VENDOR TOTAL 7059. 16
33300 SHRED-IT 58666 03/10/98 20222 03/04/98 49.95
VENDOR TOTAL 49.95
35605 SNYDER'S DRUG STORES, * 58667 03/10/98 02/13y98 9.36
58667 03y10/98 02/23/98 10.22
58667 03/10/98 03/04/98 3.73
VENDOR TOTAL 23.31
36450 STAR TRIBUNE 58668 03/10/98 02y01/98 52.00
58668 03/10/98 901471001 01/04/9:3 612.50
58668 03/10/98 978097001 01/18/98 414.50
VENDOR TOTAL 1081 .00
;7280 STOFFEL SEALS 58669 03/10/98 0514885 02/18/98 262.00
VENDOR TOTAL 262.00
3005 JEANE THORNE, INC. 58670 03/10y98 00191752 02/19/98 367.20
VENDOR TOTAL 367.20
����
����
.
_
HL,Luum / FHE-FAID CHECK REGIE
P-C10-02
MOUNDS VIEW
'ENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE
NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT
|1919 WESTERN BANK * 0 02/25y98 02/25/98 3278.44
* 0 02/25/98 02y25/98 716.64
411 ' VENDOR TOTAL 3995.08
0888 HEALTHPARTNERS 57567 02/11y98 02/11/98 • 401 .39
VENDOR TOTAL 401 .39
4200 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REV* 57576 02/20/98 02/20y98 214.00
VENDOR TOTAL 214.00
3595 FINANCE DEPARTMENT - * 57577 02/25y98 02/25/98 45.00
VENDOR TOTAL 45.00
1919 WESTERN BANK 57578 02/25/98 02/25y98 66983.01
57578 02/25/98 02/25/98 15948.83
VENDOR TOTAL 82931 .84
}082 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST* 57579 02/25/98 02/25/98 146.50
VENDOR TOTAL 146.50
7887 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES INS * 57580 02/25/98 02/25/98 13368.70
VENDOR TOTAL 13368.70
7900 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 57581 02/25/98 02/25/78 56.25
57582 02/25/98 02/25/98 5863.48
VENDOR TOTAL 5919.73
����
���
GRAND TOTAL 107022.24
111
546.
MOUNDS VIEW PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES
Thursday, January 22, 1998
City Hall, 6:30 p.m.
CALL TO
ORDER: Chair Silvis called the meeting to order.
ROLL CALL: Commission members present included Chair Silvis, Stevenson, Dentz, and
Starr. Director Saarion was also present. New member MacDonald
stopped by to say that he was on his way to Florida and while he was
unable to attend this meeting; he would be available for attend the February
meeting.
MINUTES: Motion was made by Commissioner Stevenson and seconded by
Commissioner Dentz to approve the meeting minutes of December 4,
1997. Motion passed unanimously.
Ai1997 ANNUAL
REPORT: The Commission reviewed the 1997 annual report as Director Saarion
reviewed highlights.
1998 GOALS: Director Saarion reviewed the Department's goals for 1998 and asked if
the Commission wished to develop their own goals. After discussion it
was suggested that the Commissioner's contemplate on goals for 1998 and
re-visit this item at the February meeting.
RICE CREEK
REG. PLAN: Director Saarion introduced the master plan for the Rice Creek Regional
Northern Trail Corridor that Ramsey County is undertaking. This
development plan will benefit Mounds View residents because it will give
opportunity for residents to access the trail/waterway for recreational uses
at the trailhead to be located at Old Hwy 8 and County Road H. The entire
project will provide a trailway system connecting two counties from
Centerville Lakes area to the Mississippi River.
Commissioner Dentz made a motion seconded by Commissioner Starr to
recommend that the City Council approve the Master Plan for the Rice
Creek North Regional Trail Corridor. Motion passed unanimously.
CC MARKET
INFORMATION: Director Saarion asked the Commission to review a draft of Community
PARK DED.
SURVEY: Director Saarion shared a survey that was conducted by Ingraham& Voss,
Inc. The survey included information from 46 cities in Minnesota, most of
which were metropolitan area cities but also included St. Cloud, Albert
Lea, Alexandria, Austin, Brainerd, Pipestone and others. Mounds View
falls within the standard Park Dedication requirements. The Commission
also reviewed the updated Park Dedication Fee Ordinance.
LCMR GRANTS: Director Saarion reported that grant applications have been solicited for
community improvement projects that affect the environment. Two grants
will be prepared, one for acquisition and development of wetland near the
Community Center and one for development of recreation facilities outside
of the Community Center. Grants will go to City Council at the February
work session for consideration.
SLIDING HILL: Director Saarion reported that two persons were injured at Silver View
Park. One woman was sliding and went over a jump and injured her back.
A 10 year old boy was snowboarding and went over a jump and fell on his
head resulting in a concussion and brain blood clot. Both accidents
involved going over jumps that children had made. Director Saarion
reported that the parks crew levels jumps on a regular basis. However
children make the jumps as quickly as they are leveled. Commissioners
discussed the issue and concluded that it is good to continue to level the
jumps when they are detected. Director Saarion will order a special sign
prohibiting the making of jumps and asking users to destroy jumps if they
see them. Reminders to slide safely will be printed on flyers and other
material when opportunities arise.
YOUTH REG.: Director Saarion requested the Commissioners to reserve Saturday, March
21 from 9:45 - 12:00 noon to help with youth athletic registration for
summer sports. Commissioners' assistance is greatly appreciated.
ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Stevenson made a motion seconded by Commissioner
Dentz to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed unanimously.
•
Item No. 5C
• Meeting Date: 3-09-98
Type of Business: CA
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Mayor and City Council
Item Title/
Subject: Licenses for Approval
Date of Report: March 6, 1998
LICENSES FOR APPROVAL
General/Commercial - expires June 30. 1998
Sysco Minnesota-New
•
•
5.D
[Draft #1]
ORDINANCE NO. 141 Z
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO NOISE CONTROL REGULATIONS
AND AMENDING TITLE 600, SECTION 607.07, SUBDIVISION 2 OF THE
MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE
THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Title 607.07, Subd. 2 of the Mounds View Municipal code shall be amended to
read:
607.07: NOISE CONTROL REGULATIONS:
•
Subd. 2. Loud Or Disturbing Noises Enumerated; Restrictions: The following acts set
forth in the following paragraphs are declared to be loud, disturbing and
unnecessary noises in violation of this Section, but said enumeration shall not be
deemed to be exclusive:
a. Construction Or Repairing Of Buildings: The erection, including excavating,
demolition, alteration or repair of any building between the hours of ten o'clock
(10:00) P.M. and six o'clock(6:00) A.M. on weekdays and all day Sunday, except
where single individuals or families work on single-family residences for their own
occupancy owned by them; except, that the Clerk-Administrator may, or a
designee, incase of emergency, grant permission to repair at any time when the
Clerk-Administrator fords such repair work will not affect the health and safety
of persons in the vicinity.
•
b. Nighttime Noise In Residential Areas; Parties:
(1) No person shall, between the hours of ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and
seven(7:00) A.M., participate in any loud party or gathering of people from which
noise emanates of a sufficient volume as to disturb the peace, quiet or repose of
• persons residing in any residential area.
(2) Loud noises between the hours of ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and seven
o'clock (7:00) A.M. of such volume as to be plainly audible at a distance of one
SJR137983
MU125-32
SE.
[Draft fi �
ORDINANCE NO. 1,13
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ANIMALS AND ANIMAL CONTROL
AND AMENDING TITLE 700, SECTION 701.03, SUBDIVISION 1,
SUBDIVISION 7, AND INCLUDING A NEW SUBDIVISION 16 IN THE
MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE
THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Title 701.03, Subd. l.a. of the Mounds View Municipal code shall be amended to
read:
Subd. 1. Definitions: When used in this Section, the following words and
• phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this subdivision:
a. RUNNING AT LARGE: Any dog which is not either: (1) Effectively
contained within a fenced area on private property; or (2) Effectively restrained
by chain or lease to private property with the consent of the property owner; or
(3) Effectively restrained by a chain or leash not exceeding six (6) feet in length.
SECTION 2. Title 701.03, Subd. 7.d. of the Mounds View Municipal code shall be amended to
read:
Subd. 7. Impoundment and Redemption Procedures:
d. Disposition of Unclaimed Dogs: Any dog which is not claimed or
redeemed as provided in subdivision 6c above within five (5) days after
impounding, may be sold at a fair and reasonable price to anyone desiring
to purchase the dog if not requested by a licensed educational or scientific
• institution under Minnesota Statutes 35.71. All sums received above the
costs and license fee shall be held by the Clerk-Administrator for the
benefit of the owner and, if not claimed in one year, such funds shall be
placed in the General Fund of the Municipality. Any dog which is not
SJR137985
m1112c-17
Item No. OA
Staff Report No.
Meeting Date: March 9, 1998
411, Type of Business: CB
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA:ConsentAgenda;CB:Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
•
To: Mayor and City Council
From: James Ericson, Planning Associate
Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution 5212, a Resolution Approving the SILVERVIEW
ESTATES Final Plat as requested by Silverview Estates Inc.;
Planning Case No. 501-97
Date of Report: March 6, 1998
Background:
Previous Council Action:
The preliminary plat for Silverview Estates was approved by the City Council on December 8,
1997 in Resolution No. 5183. This resolution has been attached for your reference. The
proposed uses for the site include a Holiday station store, an 82-unit senior residential facility and
two office buildings.
•
Planning Commission Action:
At its November 19, 1997 meeting, the Planning Commission voted (7-0)to adopt Resolution
No. 526-97 recommending approval of the preliminary plat.
Final Plat Discussion:
The final plat for Silverview Estates contemplates the replatting of 8 lots containing
approximately 13 acres of land into 4 lots within the Planned Unit Development. Proposed lot
areas are as follows:
• Lot 1 (Holiday Stationstore): 69,862 sq. ft. (1.6 acres)
• Lot 2 (2-Story Office Bldg.): 92,454 sq. ft. (2.12 acres)
• Lot 3 (1-Story Office Bldg.): 48,000 sq. ft. (1.1 acres)
• Lot 4 (Senior Housing Bldg.): 354,140 sq. ft. (8.13 acres)
The project site is bordered by Highway 10 to north and east, Silver Lake Road to the west, and
the St. Paul Waterworks right of way to the south. To the south end of the property, there lies a
4.5 acre wetland which will not be encroached upon as a result of this development.
Analysis:
According to Section 1202.01, Subdivision 1 of the CityCode, full platting is required d for all
major subdivision requests. The applicant, Silverview Estates, Inc., is requesting approval of the
Planning Case No. 501-97
Silver Estates Final Plat •
March 9, 1998
111 Page 3
Recommendation:
Approve Resolution No. 5212 approving the final plat for the Silverview Estates, with
stipulations.
James Ericson, Planning Associate
Attachments:
1. Planning Application
2. Zoning Map
3. City Council Resolution 5183,approved 12/8/97
4. Draft Easement Document,dated 3/5/98
5. Letter from Examiner of Titles,Robert Beutel,to Julie Brabender,E.G.Rud&Sons,dated 2/20/98
6. City Council Resolution 5212
alo7. Full-size Plat,dated 3/298(Separate Attachment)
N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\501-97\5212-CC.RPT
•
�.%za:ars 14:46 F.i� 912 784 3313'. CIr OF 003/005
City of Mounds View,MN
Develo•ment A•oiication
Paee 2
L,resent Use ofPr+opctry
L'a,develaped/Vaeaat
o
DuplewTwo=aasilyDwel:ing Single Family Dwelling
O BusiaGsslCoauaercial Saab lishmaat IrIuIa trial y Dwelling
C Other(explain) fnstial Establishment
Property Classification )( Abscact C Torrens
Des tion•fProposal gir is;,L._ •LAT" ,� '� U t> I � l.,t�bt 4
•�_
•
B Y MY(OUR)SIGNA.TURE ON THIS APPLICAT'ON,I HEREBY DECLARE THAT.TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE.T'-.E INFORMATION?ROI/MED IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
Signature of Applicant
Name of Applicant(typed/printed).
Signature of Property O - .
Name ofPrope;ty Owner(tvped/priate ) £dFaI iG/ J
� tri -1Z�� / 'is �`. � �/{• '
Address of Owner ,
u trkir rU ,
Phone Number of Owner i14- .L4.
1163- 5Si
*�+.****** ******an•s*. M**s*•+*ws41. **y****Oa*s*y**tey
•Darn ofSul*Siittsl •
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Data of Acceptance
AssigPlatmizg Case No. 60.day Limit 20-day
l to:
- t2O-day limit• _ •
• Fees Paid: Acatrat* Ceck ReciptApph #
Park Dedication:
Deposits:
Otho:
Total:
•
MADATACRAUPStiCOb4CC FORK DEVAPl.F0R
1138
Resolution 5183
Silverview Estates Preliminary Plat
iihDecember 8, 1997
Page 2
WHEREAS, The Mounds View Planning Commission on November 19, 1997, approved
Resolution No. 526-97 which reccommended approval of the preliminary plat, and Resolution
No. 515-97 which reccommended approval of the development review for the Silverview Estates
PUD.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves
the preliminary plat request by Silverview Estates Development Company contingent upon the
following:
1. The applicant shall draft a separate signage and landscape easement document prior to
final plat approval which dedicates to the City the 30'by 30' triangle of land at the
corner of Silver Lake Road and Highway 10 for a City gateway sign and a contiguous
10 foot-wide strip of land adjacent to and running the length of the Highway 10 right-
of-way for a City-approved and installed landscape treatment consistent with a to-be-
determined design theme.
2. The applicant shall apply for final plat approval with the City no later than six(6)
months after the date of approval of the preliminary plat; otherwise, the preliminary
• plat and final plat will be void unless an extension is granted by the City Council.
3. Before any permits are issued for this subdivision(building, grading or otherwise), the
applicant shall have paid a park dedication fee in amount specified by the City Council
as required in Section 1204.02 of the Municipal Code according to the appraisal report
dated October 31, 1997.
Adopted this 8th day of December, 1997.
Duane McCarty, Mayor
Al 1hST:
• Charles S. Whiting, City Clerk/Administrator
(SEAL)
•:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCES\3O1..97\5 183CCdES
Mar-05-08 05:41pm From-KENNEDY & GRAVEN 6123370310 T-007 P.03/07 F-464
• 3/5/98 DRAFT
it will not materially change the ground elevation above the
Easement Tract without the prior written consent of the City.
5 . Covenant of ownership. Grantor covenants chat it is the
owner of the Easement Tract and has the right, title, and capacity
to grant the Easements granted herein.
6 . Effect 'Upon Subsequent Parties. This Easement Grant shall
be binding upon and accrue to the benefit of the heirs, legal
representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto.
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]
•
=139081 2
MC210-22
Mar-05-98 05:44m From-KENNEDY & GRAVEN 6123379310 T-007 P.05/07 F-464
III 3/5/98 DRAFT
•
This instrument was drafted by:
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED (SJR)
410 470 Pillsbury Center
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
SSR139ua1 4
M 210-22
Isar-05-98 05:42am From-KENNEDY A GRAVEN 8123379310 1-007 P.07/07 F-454
• 3/5/98 DRAFT
[CONSENT FOR MORTGAGEE]
CONSENT
ENT
SIGNAL BANK, INC. , a Minnesota corporation, mortgagee of the
subject property described in the foregoing Easement Grant,
confirms and consents to the provisions thereof and agrees to be
bound by the provisions as the same may apply to the subject
property.
Dated this _ day of , 1998 .
By:
Its:
Bv:
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisday
day
of , 1998, by
of SIGNAL BANK, INC. , a Minnesota corporation,
on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
•
This instrument was drafted by:
. KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED (SJR)
470 Pillsbury Center
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
1714134082 6
. 21a-22
_ .
Ms. Julie Brabender
page 2
February 20, 1998
2) If the City does not ask for such a directive, I would recommend including Silver Lake
Road in the plat and dedicating it as a thoroughfare for public use, under the theory that it
doesn't cause any harm to dedicate a road more than once. If the City or County will not
approve its inclusion on the plat, the plat is still valid; the only parties who could possibly
be harmed by its omission would be the City and/or the County.
I know the question has come up of restricting the access form the platted land to specified
location on Silver Lake Road and Highway 10. The inclusion or exclusion of Silver Lake Road
within the new plat does not affect that issue. A separate agreement between the Iand owners and
the road authorities should be drawn to effect those restrictions.
Sincerel , •
• �Z
Robert Beutel
Examiner of Titles
RB/Ir
•
•
•
Resolution 5212
Silverview Estates Final Plat
iMarch 9, 1998
Page 2
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed the final plat and finds that it conforms to
the approved preliminary plat and to the applicable City Codes; and,
WHEREAS, The City Attorney has reviewed the final plat and signature page and finds
them to be adequate and legal; and,
WHEREAS, the City Attorney has reviewed the signage and landscape easement
documents and finds them to be in a form both legal and executable; and,
WHEREAS,Ramsey County has reviewed the final plat.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council
approves the final plat request by Silverview Estates Inc. contingent upon the following:
1. Before the Mayor and City Clerk/Administrator sign off on the Plat, the applicant shall
accomplish the following:
a. Make payment of the park dedication fee in the amount of$68,400 as required in
• Section 1204.02 of the Municipal Code related to dedication of lands and
according to the appraisal report dated October 31, 1997.
b. Execute and arrange to have recorded with Ramsey County the separate signage
and landscape easement document and provide proof of such recordation to the
City.
c. Execute and arrange to have recorded with Ramsey County the separate cross
access and parking easement document which allows joint use of the access
points, internal drive, drive aisles and parking by the gas station/convenience
market/car wash, the two-story office building and the senior residential facility.
The cross access and parking easement document shall be approved by the City
Attorney as to form.
d. Execute the Developers Agreement as prepared and amended by the City.
e. Provide surety or letter or credit in the amount of$113,089 prior to any work
being commenced on this project. This surety or letter of credit shall be the source
from which the City is reimbursed for all legal, engineering or consultant fees as
stated in items 3.01 and 3.02 of the signed Developers Agreement on file with the
• City, unless a separate fund or deposit account is established for this purpose in an
amount and form acceptable to the City.
Silverview .states -- ZoningMa
..„,„.„,,,,,„„„„,„„,,,,,,„,„„,„„„„,„ „„:„„:„„„„,„„,„,„„„,,„„„„„„„„,„,„„„,, ,„
__--,„„:„:„ 4'44ii4iniliil!':!'!!!:'!I'I.E::::;:;''::.g 4
N''i • • "11121-11111111111111i11111F Ilit'!11121111iiiikill2 M'Ell!:2361-r-iP211 IM.:'*''''''''''''''''''' - '
Ig4il'1444F11;igijilliiii111111 0,1141„,„11,1;;;„181, 4.11110„1„inq!„ 1„444„77:!'''':IT. _ : _
„.,,,,„:,,,,,,„:„,,:,,,,,,,:„.„,,,,,:,,__:: ,","",„„.„",,",,,„,„,,,,:,,,,,:,„,,,,,, .:,,„„„,,,,,,,,:,,„„„„,„,„„„„,„„„„„,„,,,„„ „,,,,,„,,,,„,,,,„:„:„L:„.,,,,,,,_:..,,,
,„,::„,„„„„,,,„:„„„:„.:„,„:„.„„, „„.:,,,„:::.:...
.„.:,„:„.„,....,„:._._ .,_:::„:„:, _ __„:,„ ,..„:„:„:„"„„,‘,,_ :.,.:,„,,„,..,„ .
,,,,,,,:„.,„„,„,„„
:,,,,,,,,,,„„,,,,,,,""' ,,,,",",","",,,,,".,,,,,,,.",-,,";""; ;;;•,15:iiiiiiiiiiiiii :;;;;::::77-------------- ---- —
". :,,„,„,,,„,,„,,,,,,!„„,,,,,„,„„„„,,,,,,,,,_,,,...„ „„,„'„,",,,,",„,„,,,„„„,,„„„„,
-11 -------- , --","—,,, ------ :,,,:,,,,„1,:,,„:,,,,,, , ,
Hillview Road
. —,7,411:4;111,o1 PIN iiiiii'""''''''''''"''' '''' '„,itt.,,4!,,,,i,,,,...%—",,T,J!,,elliii;-.. ..„,,,,511,,,„,,„„!!„„,,,„,,m—Ti iiiitiRliiiimigo!,:„,,,,„_„,,7_,,„„,..: _ t_ _ _
--,,,,,,,,,,,,"M"I :a"g”WI""I'Oi ''''''' M --•:-:,;:,1-1E'gq es
„,,....,,,,:„.,,,,,„ „,,,,.,,,,,,„,,,,,,.„„i„,„,,,,„„,,„,,,,,„,„,„,,, ,,,-:::,--
__ _ _ .....,_„,„ „,,„,,",,,,,",":",,,,„,„,„„:„„„„1„,,,„„ ,,„,„„„„,„,,,„,:„„,,,„,.,,„...,,,,„„,
•_„,,,,,,,,,:„.:„,:,„... „„,,,,_,_::::_ ,,
, :„.„_ ,,...:,..:.„.
„.. _. .„ . . _ _ .. ,,,,,-,
.,,"".,,,,,„,",",,,„„„u",„_,, „„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:,,,,,,:y, •
.::,„.:..,,,:,,,„,..„ „,„,,„,:,","',."'",, .,..„:„„..„ ,
- „:„:„. : /
, ,„,„,:,„„„„.:,„,„„:„..
-, „,„,0 ,:,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,„„„,,,,„„,,,,,,,,„,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,:,,,,,i,,
._:.,,,,,:,"„„,"" _ ...
z\,„„,,,,„,„„,,,,,,,,,„,„,„,„„,,.„ „„),!,,,,,,„ _ .„"":,
® /
S,Ivervi :,,,,,,„,,,,,„,,,,,,,,„,,,L,,,,,,,,,,,,i,„,,,,,,p,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,i,
i , ,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..,,,,,,,,
• :.""":,"":,_,,,.,::,:,,„,:.,„,:„,.:, ,,„,„,„.::,:.
v Es ram Ilil►.
' NM.:,„,,,,:. -gancryii, ''-'' ,0(\,11, 1_,.___A j': '
o 'oad i h!y
Y a
---,,,,,,------; -Tiiinig"11"11"II"."11- I 1 I i t.: 7-tiO, 111„6-
.
{
. j
la
N B-1IIIIIIIIIIIIIII PUD B-2R-1
R-2 B-3
R-3 A
B-4 Meeting date:
R-4 CRP
• R-5 1-1 March 9, 1998
R-O SPF
78
•
MEMO
To: Bruce Kessel,
/0,/
From: Chief Ramac
Subject: Liquor License Tr. sfer
Date: March 5, 1998
The following persons applied for a liquor license transfer:
Jeffrey Weyek
Cecila Weyek
George Marvin
Dawne Marvin
Donald Danko
The liquor license location is Donatelle's Supper Club---2401 Hwy.10. All the above were
checked for wants, warrants, and criminal histories. All checks came back as clear. I checked
with Sgt. Pearson(Mpls. Liquor Licensing), all parties were clear.
I did not find a reason for the City to deny the transfer.
•
Item No. 1C
Staff Report No.
Meeting Date: March 9, 1998
• Type of Business: Public Hearing
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA:Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing Considering Street Standards and Assessment Policy
Date of Report: March 4, 1998
The purpose of setting this public hearing was to consider comments regarding the current street
design standards and assessment policy. Notice was given to those residents of Spring Lake Road
and County Road I, along with a general notice published in the local paper. Staff requests
Council bring the information presented at the March 2, 1998 work session and any other
information they feel might be helpful. Staff received additional costs estimates from SEH for
alternative street designs. Staff has also included the survey staff presented at the work session.
Council also indicated at previous Council meetings that direction would be given to the status of
the proposed Spring Lake Road/County Road I project for 1998.
•
G°
1 ael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
co
a)
co
r 0 00 - O U) tr) c0 T
aj U) C') CO er C')
I"' C i O co O r
w t/T O in
r- 0 N LO N.
CC 2 0 O CO O C))i c5 N er CC)
0 0 69. O O N N
N Z C
N 0 C N Cr) 03 CO r n
i CCO CO ai
< 0 cco O co Co CA v R
Cn to co co u) co N
r co
C U Si N a) N U n
O O 69. CA O N N
Z C '-
• N tO 0 N N CO co LA N. N.
I— O O O O O r. 1-.
W 0 0 0 N co0CO v L
I—cc 0 cr�' v Ti Ti co o
N c a) 0 N C') 3
ic
C T T L
N 9
Q 3
U)— m tf'
2 in C «S
CO 0 0 COD CCOO CO CO co E -
a) L
CO tU, a) O to co N to t ,12 o
C C)
ailc a a
O co"O coO In"
0cc
ft)
U '�
` o r r N co to C ca °a
3 T T 69. .— X O
• C L11CZ
C U
t O c13
O O O O Tr et — to
C O O er O C' r tt)
I—W v tin in v Tr m n 10 In m O o
W 1.: N 0 'I rt CO 01 co cn ..U C
CCQa�! C) T T' co" N- ,— t o
1• Cn U O CO C') r et T to O .�
co 2 O r T N C7 to 0 8. . V
Ca 3 T r T r 0 a O
N C NAVco
m
..0 c 0 0 cn
U) 03 2
0 v to N N. N. C) cncn03 CD =
O r 0) 0 N. CC)
•
I" O O O r- r T CO Jo a4 .0 C7)(J U
L Uj ccoo_ 0 co a N. 0)_ cococo CC') c0 C7f c� a s
i Q °a CA O O N_ N O c7 0) a) a) Q - j
(A �' U T T r T N C') Ill 0 Ca •�
I- T T EH NCp � ODU a) �
Z C7 a y � UYa O
W Op,- NLI� 7 O C �
• -- II H O
> • Z Ili
�� m "3y � rn its'
o Q c U �
O N
3 m m
NCC I:: t. L : a .X
Cel
ma. ¢ I� Lt .U a) o D O co N "iO y3 �? Lca �_ Z al 03 N L Ci... Q0 CC O QU� TO
01 a)
w 0 0 < I— � 0 Cl) U CO cn � N o � r: � L 0a 0
U I� Z � � W (— ~ U a "V Om � L U U
zoow pct w U cC cn co a. o N ^ moa m a)
• ¢ z0 V ,d z I•- O V o0 ,_ m 2 3 3 3 3
� � pm m w Z U c CI a) U a) •m CD CD
O = 0Q p cp (-/ 0 ►— Ug ,,, CI w c .c mLL1Yz .- HW Cr _Z 0 W W a cn O CD (n (n O o
cn —� w .65 in
3 � v p ¢ z w a Q ~ � 6 � � o Ca a)
cc co OZ (,)1 c - 2 a• m m
zzu—. w � w O o ¢ a a � C3V) O0cn = maa) CDc0
Z — 0 2 „ a gcnzzoaccx
W"x "'x
a. WI- 0v 0 W = O c N H WW
2 cn cn cn I -..---
0 + + CI) + W + I- UI v cm
Item No. /C.--
Staff Report No.
• Meeting Date: March 2, 1998
Type of Business: W.K.
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
Item Title/Subject: Information regarding Public Hearing on Spring Lake Rd. /Co. I,
Assessment Policy
Date of Report: March 6, 1998
Staff and SEH has prepared a response to the memo forwarded to Councilmembers by Ms.
Haake (see her memo to Council dated 2-9-98). It is attached to this report. In addition to the
responses, staff has prepared a list of items mentioned by either staff, residents or Council that
could be considered with the current street standards and assessment policy.
1. Should the current assessment policy be revised? _5__yes no
2. What should be revised? _2_street percentage assessed
_1_storm sewer assessment_1_water main percentage
• _l_sanitary sewer main percentage
3.Street assess % 50 45 _2_40 35 _130 25 20
Storm sewer$$_2400 350 1300 250 200
Water main% 50 45 140 _135 130 25 20
Sanitary main% 50 45 _1_40_1_35 _1_30 25 20
4. Should the City establish a unit price or front foot price to be assessed for all streets
based on the improvement and adjust that amount annually? _2 yes_1_no
5. Should the City appraise each property within a project to establish the individual
property assessment? _1_yes _l_no
6. Should MSA or Co. Tumback funds be applied to the specific roads that receive that
designation, thereby reducing or possibly eliminating any probable
assessments? _2_yes _2_no
7. Should the City standard allow enough width for parking on at least one side of the
street MSA 32', and random parking, 30' on residential streets? _1 yes_1_no
8. Should the current construction standard of a 30 foot wide minimum street be
changed?_2_yes_1_no
9. Should the City utilize MSA funding and construction standards where
designated?_3 yes_1_no
9. Should the City standard design include curb and gutter?_2 yes_1 no
1 B618 1 D411
10. Should the City utilize the existing width of every street and reconstruct to that
• width, ie. not widen any streets, not have a standard width. yes _3_no
11. Should the City ask residents for street and drainage designs they would prefer for
their street and construct in accordance with the residents requests? _3_yes _1_no
Item No. O
Staff Report No.
Meeting Date: March 2, 1998
IType of Business: W.K.
WK: Work Session:PH:Public Hearing;
CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business •
City of Mounds View Staff Report •
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
Item Title/Subject: Information regarding Public Hearing on Spring Lake Rd. /Co. I,
. Assessment Policy
Date of Report: February 26, 1998 •
Staff and SEH has prepared a response to the memo forwarded to Councilmembers by Ms.
Haake (see her memo to Council dated 2-9-98). It is attached to this report. In addition to the
responses, staff has prepared a list of items mentioned by either staff, residents or Council that
could be considered with the current street standards and assessment policy.
1. Should the current assessment policy be revised? ✓yes no
2. What should be revised? )< street percentage assessed
storm sewer assessment water main percentage "
sanitary sewer main percentage
III 3.Street assess % 50 45 40 35 30 25 20
Storm sewer$$ 400 350 300 250 200
Water main% 50 45 40 35 30 25 20
Sanitary main% 50 45 40 35 30 25 20
4. Should the City establish a unit price or front foot price to be assessed for all streets
based on the improvement and adjust that amount annually? yes no
5. Should the City appraise each property within a project to establish the individual
property assessment? ye 14Qfa.ts cUs-t 40 c;L( '•>
6. Should (Co. Turnback funds e applied to the specific roads that receive that
designation, thereby reducing or possibly eliminating any probable
assessments? ,/'yes no
•
7. Should the City standard allow enough width for parking on at least one side of theme /7,4I,
street MSA 32', and random parking, 30' on residential streets? yes no Ilu" e.,4-- 1
,, 8. Should the current construction standard of a 30 foot wide minimum street be
changed? ✓ yes no
9. Should the City utilize MSA funding and construction standards where
' designated? yes no
"A' 9. Should the City standard design include curb and gutter? //es no
_____B618 D411
'' 0 10. Should the City utilize the existing width of every street and reconstruct to that width,
ie. not widen any streets, not have a standard width. Yes ono e 4\E"
11. Should the City ask residents for street and drainage designs they would prefer for �^
their street'and construct in accordance with the residents requests? '( yes o °I. '2� ;t'
61"3-"1 1 L 1-"
=-17.- - I f 3. -C-0,-8-s !i ed 40 ro road w4 N-h e. , Q r v ) - o T.
ass4ataPd , KO Lk) da66 , Li �-�, - 01-u\ iy)
nd�
I __ n 1 n,\„ ,-,,..1N t . ,.J .: __ ) >
Item No. O
Staff Report No.
Meeting Date: March 2, 1998
Type of Business: W.K.
II WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA:Consent Agenda; CB:Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
• From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
Item Title/Subject: Information regarding Public Hearing on Spring Lake Rd. /Co. I,
Assessment Policy
Date of Report: . February 26, 1998 •
Staff and SEH has prepared a response to the memo forwarded to Councilmembers by Ms.
Haake (see her memo to Council dated 2-9-98). It is attached to this report. In addition to the
responses, staff has prepared a list of items mentioned by either staff, residents or Council that
could be considered with the current street standards and assessment policy.
1. Should the current assessmen -policy be revised? 1/ yes no
2. What "ould be revised? V stre t percentage assessed
‘�torm sewer assessment V water main percentage
anitary sewer main percentage
110 3.Street assess % 50 45 40 ' 30 25 20
Storm sewer $$ x400 350 310 250 200
Water main% 50 45 40 SO 35 30 25 20
Sanitary main % 50 45 40 ft 35 30 25 20
4. Should the City establis o int oot .nc, to be assessed for all streets '
based on the improvement and adjust that amount annually? V yes no
5. Should the City appraise each property within a project to establish the individual
property assessment? yes no /114Y3€€ J F .D EF/'7 M t--C S-rs .q R-Y
6. Should MSA or Co. Turnback funds be applied to the specific roads that receive that
designation, thereby reducing or possibly eliminating any probable
assessments? ✓yes no
7. Should the City standard allow enough width for parking on at Ieast one side of the 1 E
street MSA 32', and random parking, 30' on residential streets? yes no Fr_et n T
8. Should the current construction standard of a 30 foot wide minimum street be RE�l9E
changed? yes no /niiY$C
9. Should the City u lize MSA funding and construction standards where
designated? V yes no
9. Should the City standard design include curb and gutter? yes no ti A if?c f r n
_B618 D411 ( A
Fa 1 E
10. Should the City utilize the existing width of every street and reconstruct to that width,
ie. not widen any streets, not have a standard width. yes no F En P20TE=.c71---
• 1 1. Should the City ask residents for street and drainage designs they would prefer for
their street and construct in accordance with the residents requests? ' yes no
Item No. O
Staff Report No.
Meeting Date: March 2, 1998
Type of Business: W.K.
• WK: Work Session:PH:Public Hearing.'
CA:Consent Agenda:CB:Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
Item Title/Subject: Information regarding Public Hearing on Spring Lake Rd. /Co. I,
Assessment Policy
Date of Report: February 26, 1998 .
Staff and SEH has prepared a response to the memo forwarded to Councilmembers by Ms.
Haake (see her memo to Council dated 2-9-98). It is attached to this report. In addition to the
responses, staff has prepared a list of items mentioned by either staff, residents or Council that
could be considered with the current street standards and assessznt policy.
1. Should the current assessment policy be revised? v yes no
2. What should be revised? street percentage assessed
storm sewer assessment water main percentage
sanitary sewer main percentage
3.Street assess % 50 45 40 35 0 25 20
• Storm sewer$$ 40t� 350 300 250 200
Water main% 50 45 40 35 25 20
Sanitary main % 50 45 40 35 0 25 20
4. Should the City establish a unit price or front foot price to be assessed for all streets
based on the improvement and adjust that amount annually? yes no
5. Should the City appraise each property within a project to establish the individual
property assessment? *N( yes no
6. Should MSA or Co. Turnback funds be applied to the specific roads that receive that
designation, thereby reducing or possibly eliminating any probable
assessments? yes no
7. Should the City standard allow enough width for parking on at least one side of the _
street MSA 32', and random parking, 30' on residential streets? yes K no
8. Should the c rrent construction standard of a 30 foot wide minimum street be
changed? yes no
9. Should the City utilize 1VJSA funding and construction standards where
designated? yes no
9. Should the City standard design include curb and gutter? yes no t
B618 'iNI .411
10. Should the City utilize the existing width of every street and reconstruct to that width,
ie. not widen any streets, not have a standard width. )yes no
• 11. Should the City ask residents for street and drainage designs they would prefer for
their street and construct in accordance with the residents requests? yes no
J
p Cac �lt
Item No. O
Staff Report No.
Meeting Date: March 2, 1998
• Type of Business: W.K.
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA:Consent Agenda:CB:Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
Item Title/Subject: Information regarding Public Hearing on Spring Lake Rd. /Co. I, .
Assessment Policy
Date of Report: - February 26, 1998
Staff and SEH has prepared a response to the memo forwarded to Councilmembers by Ms.
Haake (see her memo to Council dated 2-9-98). It is attached to this report. In addition to the
responses, staff has prepared a list of items mentioned by either staff, residents or Council that
could be considered with the current street standards and assessment policy.
1. Should the current assessment policy be revised? yes no
2. What should be revised? street percentage assessed
storm sewer assessment water main percentage
sanitary sewer main percentage
•
3.Street assess % 50 45 40 35 30 25 20
Storm sewer$$ y 400 350 300 250 200
Water main % 50 45 '( 40 35 30 25 20
Sanitary main % 50 45 40 35 30 25 20
4. Should the City establish a unit price or front foot price to be assessed for all streets
based on the improvement and adjust that amount annually? yes )( no
5. Should the City appraise each property within a project to establish the individual
property assessment? yes '< no
6. Should MSA or Co. Turnback funds be applied to the specific roads that receive that
designation, thereby reducing or possibly eliminating any probable
assessments? yes Y no
7. Should the City standard allow enough width for parking on at least one side of the
street MSA 32', and random parking, 30' on residential streets? ( yes no
8. Should the current construction standard of a 30 foot wide minimum street
changed? ves ` no
9. Should the City utilize MSA funding and construction standards where
designated? X yes no
9. Should the City standard design include curb and gutter? ,4yes no
X B618 D411
10. Should the City utilize the existing width of every street and reconstruct to that width,
ie. not widen any streets, not have a standard width. yes )( no
111 11. Should the City ask residents for street and drainage designs they would prefer for
their street and construct in accordance with the residents requests? yes K no
Pri,strti-jd intt-b`l
March 9, 1998
Dan Coughlin
8468 Spring Lake Road
Mounds View, MN 55112-6154
DanC@isd.net
786-4001
Honorable Mayor McCarty and Councilmembers:
The following pages are presented to you to provide additional information for the
Spring Lake Road/ County Road I road reconstruction project.
Over the past 2+ business days, Duane Haakenson of Frattalone Paving Inc. has
been working on a good faith estimate of what it would cost to reconstruct our two
roads using various scenerios. Before I go on, I would like to go on the record
thanking Duane and the other estimators at Frattalone for going above and beyond
the call of duty in presenting these price quotes. Duane and his co-workers had only
a few short days to visually survey the site and work on the cost estimates for me,
yet he was gracious and professional to the end. He even came out to my house
• from his office so to deliver the final estimates in person.
In discussing this road project with Duane I asked him to estimate on the high end,
using the top quality materials (such as 100% limestone instead of recycled material
or generic gravel) for his estimate so that his figures would err on the side of
caution. Duane stated that he believes that a final bid price from Frattalone would
very likely be lower than this estimated price.
Duane stated that upon his visual survey of the road, it appeared to him that the road
base was in good condition seeing that there was very little settling to be observed.
Though core samples would need to be taken to verify this, Duane felt confident
enough that the base was indeed in good shape to also include an estimate to simply
mill down the existing road and replace it with new asphalt.
•
FRATTALONE
PAVING
NC.
Don Coughlin
8468 Spring Lake Road
Moundsview, MN 55112
Project: Spring Lake Road
Section: Paving 2.2 miles 24' wide
1. Mill old asphalt 3 to 4" and haul off site.
2. Grade area.
3. Install 1 to 2"2331 type-B asphalt base course.
4. Sweep and tack coat.
5. Install 2"2341 type-B asphalt wear course.
J Milling 24' Roadway Price $214,886.00
Exclusions:
• No concrete curb work.
No underground work, sewer work.
No landscape work.
No striping.
No permits.
No survey or layout.
No core taken.
FRATTALONE PAVING, INC.
Duane Haakenson
Estimator
•
3137 COUNTRY DRIVE • ST. PAUL, MN 55117 • 612/484-0385 • FAX 612/484-5327
sC
• FRATTALONE
PAVING
INC.
March 9, 1998
Dan Coughlin
8468 Spring Lake Road
Moundsview, MN 55112
Project: Spring Lake Road
Section: Paving 2.2 miles
1. Excavate additional 2' on each side of roadway.
2. Excavate 12"below finish grade.
3. Place 8"class 5 100% crushed limestone.
4. Install 2"2331 type-B asphalt base course.
5. Tack coat.
6. Install 2"2341 type-B asphalt wear course.
7. Barricades included in price.
• tf: 7,-4:_r;e -f wart<
24 Food Wide Roadway Price $477,530.00
26 Foot Wide Roadway Price $509,016.00
28 Foot Wide Roadway Price $547,335.00
Exclusions:
No concrete curb work.
No underground work, sewer work.
No Landscape work.
No striping.
No permits.
No survey or layout.
No cores taken.
FRATTALONE PAVING, INC.
c
Duane Haakenson
Estimator
•
3137 COUNTRY DRIVE • ST. PAUL, MN 55117 • 612/484-0385 • FAX 612/484-5327
S'AIW
• The MSA vs Non-MSA Debate:
It has been stated for many months during this road project discussion that
these roads need to be designated Metropolitan State Aid roads in order to
receive outside funding for our road projects.
All along, residents have strongly resisted the required standards that the
MSA funding demands. Residents have signed petitions and voiced their
opinions against wide roads, curb & gutter and sidewalks yet even in light
of that opposition, MSA funding continued to be talked about in matter-of-
fact terms.
A comparison of the 24' estimate from Frattalone Paving Inc. to reconstruct
Spring Lake Road and County Road I with the staff/engineer proposed
costs bring this discussion to a conclusion.
41, Let's do the math:
Engineer's estimate based on City/MSA standards: $1,500,000
Frattalone Paving Inc. estimate of 24' total reconstruct: 477,530
A difference of : $1,022,470
At the present predicted level of MSA funding of our road at $18,000
per year, it would take almost 57 years of funding to pay for just the
difference between these two figures. This does not include additional
maintenance (crack sealing, sealcoating) - not to mention that the road
would wear out and require reconstruction again far before this
period of time had passed.
To sum up: This 'free' money comes at far too high a cost!
•
Benefits of reconstructing roads to current size
and scope without curb and gutter over proposed 30' road:
- Unnecessary to relocate mailboxes, power poles, utility boxes and fire
hydrants. Thus saving time, labor and money in the process.
- Minimal loss of trees and front lawns
- Narrower roads encourage slower traffic speeds. (City of Longmont,
Colorado in association with Swift and Associates released a study
that narrower streets are safer.)
- Less maintenance costs due to smaller road (smaller cracks to seal,
less surface area to sealcoat, etc.)
- Costs less than proposed road both now and in future reconstruction
• (Future reconstructions will probably not reduce the size of the present
road; so a smaller, less-expensive road now also means spending less
of the budget on such reconstruction 30+ years from now as well)
--Isolated drainage problems could be addressed with landscape
garden amenities and/or special grading instead of expensive curb,
gutter and storm sewer projects.
- It is what a majority of residents want
- Reconstruction can possibly be done yet this year.
.
Exerpt from: "The Residential Street -- Part I"
by C. Gregory Dale & Jennifer Sham
Planning Commissioners Journal
4 [From Issue 20, page 16, of the PCJ, Fall 1995]
Summing Up:
The standard used for the typical residential
street has evolved from a narrow pavement
width and right-of way to the much wider
cross-section seen in today's suburbs. Vehicle
speeds are becoming an ever-increasing
complaint in suburban areas. Many traffic
engineers and police officers agree that drivers
respond to their surroundings and not to posted
speed limit signs. In other words, if the street
has the width and gentle curves of a highway,
people will drive on it as if it were a highway.
110 Consequently, many communities are
reconsidering their existing residential street
design standards. There are an increasing
number of planners and designers who, for
many reasons, advocate going back to the street
pattern found in older, traditional
neighborhoods. However, many developers
argue that the public is well-satisfied with the
"modern" suburban street pattern that still
predominates today.
About the Authors:
C. Gregory Dale, AICP, is Director of Planning of the planning and engineering firm of Pflum,
Klausmeier& Gehrum, in Cincinnati, Ohio. Dale is also a past president of the Ohio Chapter of the
American Planning Association, and frequent speaker at planning and zoning workshops across the
country.
• Jennifer Sham is a registered landscape architect with Pflum, Klausmeier& Gehrum, and has
worked on many projects that deal with the design issues of community planning.
10), 1 p/ 5 i� >� U C� it k'CJ°7G
-Pro M -
March 9, 1998
Delay Spring Lake Road/County Road I (SLR/CRI) reconstruction until 1999
. EXPLANATION of main five (5) reasons for delay
(Petition circulated weekend of 2/7, 2/8: 44 houses, 40 For delay; 67 signatures total)
1 . Current Road Improvement Policy does not allow For input from the residents; it does
not address neighborhood character or its aesthetics: it needs review to allow For
the education of the affected residents assessed For projects and to provide For a
vehicle (survey, questionnaire, consensus) to get a majority approval of the rood
improvement project by affected residents. These provisions would be mandatory so
that a road improvement project does not result in an adversarial relationship between
the Mounds View City Council and its residents.
2. Residents told they would be assessed 50% For road improvements on a 30' road width
(told this is "road policy" but not Found in Ordinance 600 nor in Chapter 202). This has
created a proposed $41 .04 front Foot assessment For Spring Lake Road/County Road I
residents in 1998. (In 1997, Old Hwy 8 reconstruction was only assessed X22/i.) A
review of this assessment policy/amount should be made taking into consideration State
Statute 429 that applies a cost/beneFit analysis of said assessment ie. value of
improvement has to be justified by an increased valuation of the benefiting property.
3. Residents on SLR/CRI have asked For other upgrade options (current proposal For
SLR/CRI is For 32' width, curb/gutter installed with storm sewer) so they can judge which
option best Fits their neighborhood and their Financial concerns. Delay until 1999 will
provide time For this request For other road designs be met. The present policy needs to
be amended to require that costs of all upgrade/reconstruction options be available to
affected road improvement residents so the residents can consider the type of road they
• want with complete cost information.
4. All residents in Mounds View can beneFit from a Full explanation of the various Financial
Funds available on any road improvement project and the city's budgetary needs. MSA
Funding has strict policies that need thorough understanding by all of Mounds View's
citizens, ie. road width requirements, curb/gutter requirements, clear zone requirements,
variance options, Funding penalties, etc.
5. Concern For water quality and water quantity is paramount to any road project (best
water management practices). Options as to the handling of storm water runoff needs
to be explored (ie. storm sewers, landscaping options, natural plantings and holding
ponds) and discussed with all affected road project residents. A provision needs to be
established and added to Mounds View's present Public Improvement policy addressing
these options so that curb and gutter are not the only solutions to water runoff.
Mounds View is not ready to reconstruct Spring Lake Road/County Road I until the above
concerns, information and Facts are related to all of the residents along the SLR/CRI
corridor. Reconstruction of these roads will be permanent. Our neighborhood will reflect
this improvement as long as we live. How do we want our neighborhoods to appear, Feel
and be? DELAY THE PROJECT UNTIL WE HAVE ALL OF THE FACTS, UNTIL THE "PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT "POLICY IS EXPANDED AND UNTIL WE AGREE WITH THE FINAL PLAN AND
COST ESTIMATES OF THIS ROAD PROJECT
•
Item No.
Staff Report No.
Meeting Date: March 9 1998
Type of Business: C. B.
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA: Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
Item Title/Subject: Signalization of Xylite and County Rd. )
Date of Report: March 4, 1998
Staff spoke with Phil Sype of Sysco as to Council's request to split the expense of Mounds
View's share of the proposed traffic signal. Mr. Sype indicated that Sysco would be willing to
contribute $5,000.00 to the construction of the signal. Mr. Sype would also request the City of
Mounds View pursue the addition of the right turn lane shown on the plan as "possible future
right turn lane". Staff agrees with this request and did speak with John Grey of SEH. John will
speak with Anoka County regarding this issue.
Staff seeks Council direction in participating in the signal project. This project should qualify for
MSA funding for Mounds View's share. If Council elects to participate in this project, will the
project be funded with local funds or MSA funds?
•
Gam/
Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
S
Item No.
Staff Report No.
Meeting Date: March 9, 1998
Type of Business: C.B.
• WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing:
CA: Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution No. 5211 Approval and Awarding of
Bids for Phase II Construction of the Community Center
Date of Report: March 4, 1998
For Council's consideration is Resolution No. 5211, approving and awarding the bids for
construction of phase II of the Community Center. This resolution includes the alternates
discussed and reviewed with Council at the work session on March 2, 1998. The alternates
accepted at that time were#1,2,3,4,5,8,10,12,13,15,16,19 and 20.
Total of alternates above: $ 354,389.00
C.M. fee (3%) $ 10.631.00
Total: $ 365,020.00
Construction total of base bid only of subcontractors with
lowest sum of base bid plus alternates: $3,108,087.00
Alternates: $ 365.020.00
Total: $3,473,107.00
Construction total of only lowest base bid subcontractors: $3,098,619.00
Staff has prepared Resolution No. 5211 for Council's consideration. The resolution refers to
Exhibit A which is the bid tabulations for award to the lowest responsible bidder.
Should Council have any question regarding this report,please feel,free to call me.
Michael Ulrich, i irector of Public Works
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve Resolution No. 5211 Approving and Awarding the
• Construction bids for Phase II of the Community Center.
V
•
Alt#15 Curb & gutter at perimeter
• Masonry +$ 6,600.00
Earthwork +$ 2,442.00
+$ 9,042.00
Alt#16 Parking lot expansion
Landscape +$ 2,720.00
Concrete '+$ 2,200.00
Site change (Bel Air) +$ 3,000.00
Asphalt +$24,000.00
Storm Change (Penn) +$11,290.00
Fence +$ 1,908.00
Electric +$ 3,950.00
+$49,068.00
Alt#19 Wood gym floor in B108
VCT/Carpet -$ 7,250.00
2 rooms wood not 6 -$26,231.00
Gym floor +$62,453.00
+$28,972.00
40 Alt#20 Masonry Sealer +$19,500.00
t
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that this project will be
funded with Tax Increment Financing (TIF) funds and the City
41, Council authorizes the Director of Public Works to sign all change
orders up to 19s of the awarded project.
Adopted this 9th day of March, 1998 .
ATTEST:
MAYOR
•
(SEAL)
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
411
411
O 0 L. 00 0 IA 0 N 0 0 0 0 0303101" H 1-. Z
w n Y W 0
O O u. 1.4 . N T N 0 OOi ut r o0 .. f• m p
0000 . 0000i" o O o 0 0 0 3 1~•.' 7 A C A m
P1
A rt 0 'O 01 m .'q. ..1 2 S A I b .0 N 0 w ° r ° 0 O
1. 1. N n 00 e n n
m O n n m n 0 w .0.. n ° a 0 0 0 0 •
w n 'C 0 N
n Q ° O o. n m 0 �° "' n a • S a n p .. 0 0
n S 0 m O .010 2. O n w . •n 2 - .mu 0 °, - w y - 3 0
0 0 0 0 —o. n 0 ° e v m �. 00 :. 05 Q 0 a 0 M 0n m
.0. .. O ° r m — • Om o n 0 .. 0 M S n . "' BO0 0 n
^ — n O ... n .. N n 0 • re ° 0
_ — O l0 0 — _ _ 3 _to s n 2 : 0 `C 3 m n
I. m m
— 0 MOM r — 7
I.
w o
- N op
o
F O
$3
.....
Ol
m m r m Z r d s n i i 17 2 r 0 b A L1
O .. n N • n n O F n n C 7' n n ° n
35 .3 n b 7 3 0
MO Q a r ° m m - e . . n. n no C O
e 0' a .• '< � O '< O n 0 ° n '< 3 rot
C 0 c e
o0. +f 5 3 rral r 0• m W
n e n 'O .Of n 0
•01
o
0 S n
1. m
ma E 0. w
0
= m N 0 IN+ N N
N N N . N N J n
m N m N N W O O O N M
m
0 o e o d G
0 0 •0 0 •0 0 0 0 0 l•Oo
N n 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •0 0 •0 0 0 0 0 c m
0000000000000000000 m a
•
Oft O
'3 .4
3• 3 n
O m ✓
'R-
.
o w s 00.
y
0
m
b
,OO a1... •
n 3
0 o 0 S ry
p 0 0 •n w w
0 0o S 0
0 0 ,... 0.m
2
u m
n
o 0
O0 m
o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 •
0000000000000000000 A b
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w
1.
C.
\� Om u N1110, N u o .Ni nO'
com N N m N N N O 0 O O IV I. N a 7
J0 0 0 0 N m .O 0000ma O N 1.. 0 0 0 0 10 ow IA N W N O 01 O.
0
• 0. 1. Z
0 0000000000000000000 a ^
N O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m n m
n
0
n n ° A
IOT
0 0 n <o. - 0
0 0•
n c
0 0 0 OM. •
•b 0
'0 n ° 3
m
100 n
0
211g :
n N O n m
• 0 0 0 5 w
0 0 art
O
n
m
0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m
O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 e 0.
A
m q
n n
• •
0 0 5 .a.• 0
G w O
O o 0 c
m m
3 A
'O 3
'O O n
m
n .-
e
n m p
6 m
0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o 0 0 ..1 01 10
. •
0101
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 10 m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5500
A
O.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o o Ic 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 m n
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m y
b
b
9
r,
P. 3
0 0000000000000000000 °n. /41,
3by
• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 m 0• n
N m N 0 N r ► V NN O
0 0 0 0 2 u o 5 o o o m
o p 2 v 0 n °
O O O O N m N O N V O o 0 0 b p ry y
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 19, ° ‘1 w e
n
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 1. S
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 ° 0 row
0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 q
N- T' O N N 0 c0 0 N- C) 0 0 0 0 0 Nr 0 CO 0 Cr) t1) 0 0 M U) U) N- U)
J C) M C)) M CO O I- O r CO 0 r (O 111 CO C) M N- O O of N- N- N- Q)
r V' 0 M t() 0 M M C)) U) d• NN-
C7 r tr Ch LO 0 u1 r [7 to CO co
t() CO CO N Q) 0 U1 C7 CO N N CO N- N- r N- r O U) N- Is- CD N Ch
0 r CO CO I"- CO r (h r O O to UC) t1) UC) CO N '7 d' UC) CO r
r r r r N N r r r r
I—
I40 ....
O O ti N '
O O O O
CO O
O N- CO tl) r
E -u- .1- NLO NM (U)
I
4 1
I
I Cr) Cr)
I vv
C. I
U) O 1
L1-1 U E1
Q Q I
Z I
CL .r 1
I— Q
J
Q Z.
3
O
E
Q
ii
Q
c
3
O
E
Q
Q z
0 CT) (*i CO
C4Cfl
0(%j 0 COO N e- 0
W f—
Et
0 1 18 A cOCO (NDO (I�0 O rN- O O Or O s 0 r T (M) o O O C7 14) UI- U)
U) CD CO CO C7 N00 000N- ) Am r C r CA 111 0 C) VI CA
Cr) CA r N- Cr) r CA N M U) 0 t() C') t1) O 1.1) co
W I to co CA r C) O_ t() C) CO N N- of N. N- CO C7 I,- r O CD O r 0) C7
CO I ,- co, - - co N N r 00 tANtht1) La co
NNN N r
Q
W m I
CD
I >'
I
0 1 c
w
Q0. N O U U
p m CA 7 To
0 Q' 1 d.0 c ` l0 c Cn c O O 'U m
m a 1 C) N O ` o CU4 N m 0 t0 t O- . N o c N �` o
W 0 1 `• >2 c? ov E T c c •E S ca 2 Q w c -O E a nN 5 Q
g m 1 :? > = o O c o N = o ) O N 0 7 0` o = ease o
tL 1 co ¢ W5tY ¢ U cocoU Y2 Y Z 5 0Lu20 c - 0 ¢ CSO ° 1--
J I
u-i
CO I N
Io
P. 0 0
Z 1 P- o
rn
a l c o 0
y= a) m 0 C7 IL f3
c
V 1 2 o Y C 0I Q y t0 N
W I N O O = ca
p V 03 a o
0 I ii tY 0 0 Cl) U- U CD a H Q
1
I
• 4t -I' to 1-- r O N Ctl Nr to
W 1 r v-- •r N N N N N N CO N
CD 1
I O
I
I co-
01
a1 ,
0 0 0 0 u) 0 M
j CO I's 0 0r- O 00
Q CA CD CO Nt O r-
O N CO M r Cf) CD
O M V) CO CO CO O N
r r M M M Tr
CI In 0 0 0co
O CO M M (D N
M CD C() to O)
Q CD CO CO CD CD
C
(I O 1 Lo OLnOO
11J E 1 r0.) 0r0
Q < 1 r r N N Cr,
Z 1
1
pi Q 1 Cn In C() IC) C()
J CD 0
NI 0) O O O O coO
Q
v
r r
Q 1 rr vv
C
O O 0• II CD 0 0 r_ 0 0
E 11 � o 0 (0CD CD 0 (0
Q II r (70
If
II
▪ II
Q 11 M M M M M M M
•hi
> M
W 1
� 1
0 II 0 0 O O Ifo) 0 0
Fa co o
II co Tr N CV) C) (( 0N
WII r N (D r- N- C) w-
(i) II rr M MMMT
m II
II
U u
d O
CL I O Q) N
W 1 •E
co
m o 1 „ o � s � � c
2 °ts Q E .� a
m 1 CL � C7 (nCCY
J I
W
Ca I
• Z 1
01 •
H I
c i .a
U I
CI)
1E a
CL LU
• � I r
W
('
I
Y t
0 I
a
• MANAGEMENT MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday,February 25, 1998 @ 10:00 AM
I. Call to Order
Meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. Present: Whiting, Ramacher,Jopke, Saarion,
Kessel, Sanchez, Hammerschmidt, Ulrich, and Zikmund
II. Department Reports -Jopke reported that a second Highway Design Theme meeting will
be Thursday, February 26. Jopke stated that he has received 30 applications for the Economic
Development Coordinator position. The department is in the process of drafting a T& E for the
position. Saarion reported that she had attended a meeting with the school district asking for a
proposal for grounds maintenance. Saarion stated that Jennifer, a new temporary will start
March 19 and will work through the end of August. She will be administering summer youth and
adult sports athletic programs. Saarion stated the Mounds View Community Theater wants to
transfer funds to their account, and that boulevard tree trimming has began. Kessel reported that
Donatelle's will be sold, the tentative date is March 15. Kessel reported Hay evaluations have
been completed and that employees have until March 2 to appeal. Ramacher reported that Dave
Brick is out this week with a bad knee. Ramacher reported that with the nice weather, graffiti
has surfaced again. Ulrich reported that SEH is preparing a report on Barb Haake's memo. He
stated that he will have a staff report asking questions for direction. Ulrich reported that he
• attended a meeting with MNDOT,Anoka and Ramsey County discussing a stop light installation
at Airport Road and County Road J. Ulrich stated he was not positive which part of the street is
public, but is looking into this. Hammerschmidt reported that with the warm weather the golf
course opened Sunday for the week. Hammerschmidt stated that the lawsuit is scheduled for
November of 1998. Hammerschmidt scheduled the Golf Course Committee to meet March 4 at
4:00 p.m. Zikmund reported the Fire Department is looking for volunteers. He stated the Fire
Department has sold another fire truck. Whiting reported that he has discontinued his
membership with the Rotary because of time constraints and a$1200 a year membership.
III. Unfinished Business -No Report
IV. New Business -MIS Committee Policy and Printer Maintenance is tabled for next
meeting. Part-time Pay Policies -Whiting stated that all departments need to have consistency
in hiring part-time employees. Kessel will put together different rules and job categories list for
department heads to follow.
V. Adjournment- There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 12:20 p.m.
Next meeting is Wednesday, March 11 at 10:00 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Tracy Sanchez, Recording Secretary
INFORMATION
ONLY
March 2, 1998
• To: Mounds View City Council
From: Susan Rathman
5140 Rainbow Lane
RE: Destruction of wetlands
As a resident of Mounds View, I am concerned about the Harstad& Co.'s recent Concept
plan to build townhomes in the County Road H2 and Long Lake Road vicinity. My
concern is based solely on the fact that area was designated a wetland and now you want to
turn it into another source of property tax area. What's the matter with leaving a few open
areas. If you want a larger tax base, how about putting some townhouses around the City
offices -there's more space there and it is not a designated wetland!
/ '?
•
INFORMATION
•
0NLY;
-
,101
er- l Northwest Youth & Family Services
* I1ahOx1 :8n Avenue North • Shoreview, MN 55126 • (612) 486-3808 • FAX (612) 486-3858
u
44.
Mr. Chuck Whiting
City Administrator
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112
Dear Chuck:
Enclosed you will find the year-end summary of services provided to the various
cities. If you wish to share just the information regarding your city, that is totally
your call. Some of the city managers were interested in getting the comparison
data. This report is similar to those you have received each quarter for the past
year, and will continue in the future. I apologize that we were somewhat late in
getting it out to you. I hope that you and your city council will find the information
useful.
As you are aware I met recently with a number of the city mangers to try and
come to some final decisions about the contract between each city and NYFS.
• There were several items in the draft contract that will be slightly modified or
expanded. The addendum about services will also be attached. As soon as all
of these changes are made we will get a copy to you. The Roseville city council
will be considering this matter again on March 9, and our board will be reviewing
it on March 12. I would suggest that you wait to make sure that both of these
bodies approve the revised document before bringing it to your council. I will get
word to you as quickly as possible on the 12th. In the meantime, if you have
questions or concerns, please feel free to give me a call. It is my hope that this
matter can be resolved soon.
Sincerely,
1 �
Kay Andrews, LICSW
Executive Director
INFORMATION
ONLY
•
*
Z o 0)) CD o CD D n z• 0
cu
m c = c CD O a) c
S to �G' cD o O ? O N 3 3 O O cn
no ami c =' = 3ccc in 2, = N
2 C 5 'II cC 0 = a. cn .z' Cl) m CD Xi co
cD to c� CD a m 11
• o`• 0 N O CD 09") MCI) CCD n ca 3. N 0 0
5' rt y <_ a
CD cl)
6• , CD cn
y 3 - N CD
cn
a C
a 0
Q
4 CD CD I
y EA Eft -A z Eft EH Efl AO VI -69 70 0
= = 0 0 ..", > - CO CO —
D 0 0 0 CJt al a) 3
m mm = N `<
c c
co tD
0
o0 a« R.
o O a co 0 0 00 .. 0 O CO W j O co Ili m 0
Q. 0 7 n C co 2 _—
cn
1 O O O.
OCD n 3•
o cp -Q CD 0 N
* = Cl) 0
<D 0 CD
0) N N -0 O� O
z 4, v O o) A W A < CSD 13
0 o' y o 0 0000 tea) o 4'
v (IT ca
0
v N o� 3
-r a1
`.. j a c " 6A EH c cc co T o
o 0 .-. -0 J� -4. W N C) Oo N' �1 <
c CO cu -1 CO 416 0 CO CA EH 69 W CD
a -a c o .1' 0 0A000 OO ��. = Lb
3
O• N b 0 00000 0 �. ��
n'
1:3* N O
a Cn c rn
ET
� CO -� N 3 N CJt --1 A - CO - - A A N
CD
n 0 —09 a' cO N A W 0 000 co co 3 Z n cn
,,„ O a) N _ CD 5.
yNo N Q N
o•
o
O -<
11
4 0
z N C)1 ~' Z 00 . O) s W -' W W ...4,C W W N O 0 -' W W W O (/)
• �aWv CO • 0 W CJt W < (D• O OA N " OO ~ =
O CI) CO O V
O Jt 0 O O O
0 0 0 0 61 0 CD 'o. O
p
O Q 0 c
N
•
W m g o z � oZ o o
co 3 �• cD v i m 2C
S co - • ° 5- n -, 3 : 07 : o
a. su c 5 = o c c m �' N at ='
c� 3 'a CO 0 �. N 4.2` 0) m (D a Co
0 °: fD -D co N CA v) (D O. . N 7 U)
�' O c(n O O O �D N n cQ �. 2 O lD
co ,.,, cn 3 n. n < <
•
CD y ca 0 0 m CDD ri N N cD cD
6' cD (D N PO 09
Q vs
co 3 0 CD m
co N
a C
a0 .
a 2 2
cD c) z EAEAEA40EA EA 20 I
= 3 ca = 00 " > 0 - 000TI 001 CO CO rn C
`D mm m
`OC C w
a v a 4t
C)
0) O O '� Q N A O CD
0 a O nC N � WC� NA � O � N W 3. W 2
y G) --. n - O — CD �*
o a 0 a 0 °-
00' -Ca 0 D Z
O
CD 0) n. N W p cc G O O N C)1 " '� -A O CO ID
O CO O W 0 •O A CO v cc N < (D
0)0 y N O O CNA 0• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0• 0 • 0
O O NO 0
• O
O zr
U) SA
n
n 1
N n 0 0
p C31 A § EA EA N EA EA EA EA N C 0 -I co ` '�
`c ^ 5. ss O EA N N O co A v EA 10 CO " O . a 0 O O
CD Fir C
0 C C C " 01 O N 0) 0 W 01 a71 0 A 0. „-"14-, M > ^'
0 C -0 0. 0,h -+ 0 0 (31 0 0 -A 0 0 01 0 CO O 0
'0 �-' J 0 O v O O O O O O O co C = Pa
co O.
0 0 CT1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V Q < 11
n'
Ci)
O
0 Z N * k.
C
CD
c. CO N 3 -iNV A O A A A o
O e/)
` O 0 — a' A cO N . . ( 1 co O O CO W O $ C) 6D
. O) o cC N A A CO CO CO _. cc o co CD �• �.
0 �' N co
cnCa
0
0
O_
0.
N
..3. c) Z co -� O CO "� CO Co) -'• 1'1
M C31N 2 C W Co N CO A O C11 � *CO Co W O C!) a? (/)
C.U1 IN O 0r COco • •0 .. O W CO A G) < (D =
0 (31 -, CD O O O v D• 0 0 0 0 ccp 0 0 Z• O
• 07 -1 O U7 o O O O O O. F C7
O
is
N
*
Z o v CD o m * o Z I o
v c 3 = c cD v 3 cD n 2 c
S: cc �� m o 0 3 n a 3 u@, A- °c 3 N
a C) o cp u, CD cc
n C 'p CO O cCC on ` CO m M CO
• ° cD 1$0 to CI) co
c Cn cD a m 7 U)
�' = cn cD c) Z 0 ca m < 2
3_ 6• It. •
cD N O CD O 5 N o N n N cOD
(a 1• In co co Cp O (D O. U,
) .CD O N 7 N
Cl) cn co
Ca w
rt
a o
Q: = =
Q M CD =
O 0) -69 EA 69 z $9 69 4H 69 ffl -EA
= 00s > CTI0 L0cc CO v C
0 0 0 cr cr -•« _
cam Ill rTI Z
to o. e fD
rt C. ?
cO -0
Ca O. O * m -a cD
j n C V 00C,./ 1‘) -L O N O W 0 O n
Q. 0 w - O CD
N
0 O 53o Oa O. O
f° ..... Cl,
°o -c m
C `. 0 C)
a) = -0 O. o `�
cap O n 0 o -' 4, o O) o co C O Cn o
M o 000 0• 0000 0CD o s
• o 13
p( D O o M
cn C) CO 'w
`o 3 0
W N IT Z Oy+ C
ili D
`z at � 3 N C m -I co Mt fefo
�. o 61 — = o V
CI c � Cl) 2", N - 00) O (7' t� EA 0 O N a ? ,Z n
A- -o c p N 0 O O O O O N Q-
v v � o 0 0 b 000 0 so xi ..
4. v, `i
v 0 Z N * 13
a <D
fD c N --L _ o Cn O Z
`c CO O �• COKJ eN CO 0 al
O W W O OA) 2 C1
n O 0 CD N . co CD CO -. CO cp �• y
`c N O 'A CD
Q' -
O 0 Eli
-, Z
cn -nO
Q. N 0 Z -COO s o -' Ga -' W W -,, O Cn
Q. co N = c W N O . �' O ( '� W 0) 63 0 Cl) ID
S: 6 •N O Q' W • CO• A O W W A • w < rn = D
°-' O CJ1 00 0 0 01 00 0 0 CJ1 CD 0 0 ai 0 C. n' C O
O N g.
r
0
z o ate) c0 0 CD D O R 0 0
cD
o o
s co ,c. co o o' = 10 3 to n o =
Z C. n = N 3. 09w
a m co °. O X o o C U) ° cD t�
5- 10 ('0 o ° �. 0 cnmm (I)
• °' (D to 0 W cD a CD
13 (n
�' o v) ° O 0 (D (p Z c0) C0 7.Z. N O (D
CD
co v CD 0 Fn' x N cn
0. 0)3
o .« co CD
CD
CD C
rt
a-105
O:
4 0 CD II I
Eft EA {f! z EA EA EA EA EA EA X _
p� ? ? O O -► > 0 — 01 O 01 01 CO CO n:.
co C C as O K
�aa' D w-h
0 , m ( , cto °
� AO co WwO � F,13 :e A O N 01 C.)1 4 .
CD F6
ti 0
CI Q (D n - U) ,..r
O O (D (0 Q N
Si-) N N
0 _n
cD O `i A N "D 0 O
co N C cp 0b � VONOj0 (O4 - < N
En y 01 0 0 O O O O O O cn OCJI O Z O
• O O 0" °• _, o
-, a) 9
O N Q CA
co
n
o
a@ wNtiZ .<
o j al c MI O -). EA N EA EA C W - 3 S
`C A 5. 0) N CO N CD -� N C o CO 0 Qo
'p (D 01 U1 a0 O N CO w V ••••4N (D. •+ co
D v O (Jt co O O --� U1 O) � fD .,1 a1 V O <
'C O la .. o . O V 0 0 -LO 1\.) V O) a. ,'"" ao
) co
`� N O O b O O O in U1 N <
o 01 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 01 fD 3.
a'
co o W Z N �, (p
in' (D O N j _ co (/) O
`a 0 O �• 0.9 A COCN (0 O O w W O CD C7 41
O (� N CO CO CO �. (O (D �D (/!
4Z Co
O — Co Cl)
ca
o Z
O -<
o -n
.y..• — — 0 Z co _.a — O _ (� w �+ °_ '�
o. N al C w w N 0 J� O 111 -' W w CO p to a? —1
r•-. al. N.N = Q' W -4 CO A 0 •O 0 CO A •01 W < CD = O
O U1 (D O O O V O O O O O CV11 O a• -• o 0
Cl) , O 01 0 0 O 0 O °. 0
N
Cl)
•
.-21-584
® 3535 VACNAIS CENTER CRIVE.200 SEH CENTER.Sr PAUL.MN 55110 612 490-2000 3C0 325.2055
ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL
• Ti?ANSPCATAT/0N
March 5, 1998 RE: Mounds View, Minnesota
Highway 10 at Edgewood Drive
SEH No. A-MOUND9708.00
Mr. Rick Jopke
Community Development Director INFORMATION
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 •
ONLY
Dear Rick:
We have just obtained a prioritized list of the fiscal year 1999 Mn/DOT Municipal Agreement
Program Projects. The list is a ranking based on evaluation by the Project Selection Committee
which consisted of both Mn/DOT and municipal engineers. The Mounds View project on
Highway 10 at Edgewood Drive was ranked No. 25. Funding for the Municipal Agreements
Program was limited to 3.1 million dollars. Only the first 21 projects were funded.
Int initial meetings between
the City and Mn/DOT,Mn/DOT indicated it would not approve a
new signal or change the median location on Highway 10. Through discussions with Mn/DOT, we
have progressed to a position where Mn/DOT sees benefits to the changes, and has verbally agreed
to allow the City to proceed with the changes. The request for Mn/DOT financial participation in
the changes was secondary to securing approvals.
Our hopes were that Mn/DOT would pay for one half of the cost of the traffic signal. Although Iess
of a possibility, we had also hoped that Mn/DOT would be inclined to pay for the Ieft turn Ianes and
the median island relocation. The signal would have been funded at between$60,000 and$75,000
for the Mn/DOT share, plus 8 percent additional for construction engineering and inspection.
With the lower priority given to the signal in the ranking system,there are several options which the
City now faces. The first option is to continue with a locally funded project. This will fit with the
initial thoughts on the project.
Second option would be to wait for the next submittal period and submit it for fiscal year 2000
:i.inding. This funding would aot be available until July 1, 1999,meaning that the project would not
x completed until the fall of 1999 or even spring of year 2000. There is, however, also no reason
'o believe that the project would rank higher compared to others which will be initially submitted
'oro fiscal year 2000 funding.
'ELLIOTT
iICX3ON INC. MINNEAPOLIS MN ST.CLOUD .NN
CHlP°:TNA FALLS'M MADISON.'Mr^
L.4KECOUNTY.IN
EOUAL OPPCRTUNITY.9.1PLOYER