Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packets - 1998/03/23
66 PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting February 4, 1998 Mounds View City Hall 2410 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call To Order The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Peterson at 7:00 p.m., February 4, 1998. 2. Roll Call Members present: Chairperson Peterson, Commissioners Brooks, Johnston, Miller, Obert, and Stevenson. Members absent: Commissioner Brasaemle (Excused). • Also present: Community Development Director Jopke, Planning Associate Ericson, and Recorder Dave Hix. Council Liaison Koopmeiners was absent (Excused). .Index to Minutes Page Planning Case No. 512-98, 2375 Highway 10; Development Review, 2 Saturn Development. Planning Case No. 507-97, Highway 10, County Road I and Eastwood Road; 4 Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning, TOLD Development Company (Walgreens) 3. Approval of Minutes • a. December 17, 1997 b. January 7, 1998 Chairperson Peterson asked for comments, questions or changes to the listed minutes. There were no comments, questions or changes. i Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 1998 Special Meeting Page 2 • 4. Presentation: North Metro I-35 Corridor Coalition. University of Minnesota Design Team Director Jopke gave the Commission and citizens in attendance a brief introduction to and background on the University of Minnesota Design Center for American Urban Landscape (Design Center) and the North Metro I-35W Corridor Coalition (Coalition). The seven communities of Arden Hills, Blaine, Circle Pines, Mounds View, New Brighton, Roseville, and Shoreview make up the Coalition. Their vision statement was stated as follows: "The Coalition will jointly and cooperatively plan for and maximize the opportunities for regional community development, quality growth and diversification in the North Metro through a system of collaboration." Mayors and city administrators/managers comprise the governing board. The first year's, 1997, accomplishments include: 1. securing outside sources of finding 2. laying the foundation for a common Geographic Information System (GIS) • 3. building relationships within the Coalition as well as other governmental entities such as Anoka County, Ramsey County, school districts, state agencies, and the Metropolitan Council. . The Coalition's second year goal is to develop a subregional planning framework to shape and direct future work. The Coalition has contracted with the Design Center to assist in opening up this framework development for community input. Jopke told the Commission it is fundamental that community development committees, council members, appointed commissions, and interested citizens participate in the process. Future Coalition events will include a Coalition-wide working session for councils and commissions to be held in March or early April, and a Coalition Summit to be held in early May. William Morrish, Director of the Design Center, told the Commissioners and citizens in attendance if the seven city coalition was combined into one city, this city would be the third largest community in Minnesota. In the next ten years this second-tier-urban area, as it is labeled by the Metropolitan Council, will have over 660,000 people living and working in it. Because this area is considered fully developed, in terms of open space, the question becomes: What do we do next? This is the question that the Design Center will assist the Coalition in answering. • Mr. Morrish told the Commission that the Coalition is one of the first groups in the metropolitan area to address the growth and change issues. He said the State Legislature Mounds View Planning Commission February 4, 1998 • Regular Meeting Page 3 that Saturn provide on-site-storm-water ponding or receive a variance. No variance application has been submitted by Saturn to rectify this issue. Associate Ericson told the Commission that the City staff is recommending that the following additional information be supplied by the applicant: 1. More detailed information regarding the drainage for the site. 2. Revised photometric analysis showing footcandle readings to the centerlines of adjoining streets and luminaire specifications. 3. Documentation from Ramsey County indicating that the three lots have been combined. 4. Indication from Rice Creek Watershed District whether or not on-site ponding will be required. If so, the applicant shall revise the site plans to show how on-site ponding will be provided. In addition, the following stipulations were requested: 1. Add notation to plans that customer and employee parking will be clearly marked • and kept free of inventory. Show the location of handicapped stalls. 2. Provide detail on plan as to how trash enclosure will be constructed. Show concrete pad. Associate Ericson stated that meeting the listed requirements would make it possible for the City staff to bring forward a resolution for this proposal. Jim Price, from Saturn Development, told the Commission that Saturn should do whatever is necessary to meet the requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District. He added that the amount of asphalt area on the site is being decreased so there probably would be no need for on-site ponding. The lighting issue is being addressed and copies of the requested specifications will be submitted to the City as requested. Commissioner Stevenson told the Commission that one of his concerns now, as it was at . the time of approval of the original development, is the Highway 10 right-of-way, and that it remain available for bike paths and trails. Mr. Price told the Commission that combining the lots, as requested, would take from six weeks to two months. This process is currently underway with Ramsey County. Associate Ericson told the Commission that there are no proposals to amend the existing • CUP and there will be no impact to the CUP as it has been approved. He added that there Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 1998 Special Meeting Page 4 • Chairperson Peterson asked if there is a unified front on the Anoka County Airport Development. Mr. Morrish said there would be problems, this being one of the major ones for this Coalition Group. It is the challenge to the group to solve the problem so that all participants can get some benefit from the development. Commissioner Obert stated the Coalition would be a good opportunity for the communities to apply some needed pressure on the Met Council as a way to get the ball rolling on some projects. Warren Johnson, 7710 Greenwood, asked who chose Mounds View as a pilot area for the Coalition program. Mr. Morrish told Johnson the Mayor and city administrators were already working together, and the Mayors Association had been formative in getting the City of Mounds View involved in the process. 5. t Planning Case No. 513-98 8265 Spring Lake Road Applicant: Preferred Builders, Inc. . Consideration of Resolution No. 532-98, Approving a 7-Foot Variance to the Required 30-Foot Front-Yard Setback. The applicant, Darryl Westerlund was present. Steve Dorgan, Mounds View Housing Inspector, gave the Commission a brief background on the proposed development: In 1996 the Mounds View EDA acquired a lot at the above address through the Housing Replacement Program. At that time a 20-foot variance was applied for and granted to deal with the property's 80-foot width and the City's 100-foot-frontage requirement. On January 30, 1998, the EDA sold the property to Preferred Builders. As part of the purchase agreement Preferred Builders was required to build a minimum three bedroom, two bathroom home with an attached two car garage. The home proposed by Preferred Builders meets all of the City's requirements with the exception that the house is 7 feet • wider than the code allows. This width difference is due to the house having a three car attached garage instead of a two car attached garage. The owner is asking for a 7-foot variance to resolve the problem. Mounds View Planning Commission February 4, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 5 This is the reason that the Comprehensive Plan would have to be amended for the Walgreen Development. The Comprehensive Plan issues are: 1. What kind of buffer is the developer providing. 2. Traffic impact, a 40 percent increase in traffic. 3. Suitability for residential development. 4. The impact on the City's tax base. 5. Green space The rezoning issues are: 1. The relationship to the Comprehensive Plan 2. Surrounding developments, what are they? 3. Demonstrated need for the development. 4. Grading issues 5. Traffic impact, closing off Eastwood Road • 6. Crime impact Commissioner Johnston asked Mr. Cunningham if there was any verification to back up the statement made by a citizen that her property would fall in value by 15 percent if the Walgreen project went through. Mr. Cunningham declined to comment. Gayla Keyes, 7730 Greenwood Drive, stated that she had a realtor appraise her property. The realtor told Ms. Keyes that her property would decrease in value by 10 - 15 percent if the Walgreen project went through. Warren Johnson, 7710 Greenwood Drive, asked the Commission who would be responsible for the decrease in value of his property if the Walgreen project is approved. He asked the Commission to research this question and have some type of answer available at the next meeting that involved the project. Commissioner Obert suggested that the City use an independent real estate appraiser to • value the properties in question. Associate Ericson stated that an independent appraiser was available for the City's use and the City Attorney could be called in to answer questions of valuation impact that the Walgreen project might have. i Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 1998 Special Meeting Page 6 Setback to a later meeting, thus giving the staff the time that is required to resolve legal issues with the City Attorney. Ayes - 5 Nays -0 Motion carried. 6. Planning Case No. 512-98 2375 and 2395 Highway 10 Applicant: Saturn Development Consideration of Resolution No. 535-98 regarding Development Review The applicant, Saturn Development, represented by Jim Price, was present. Associate Ericson gave the Commission a brief review of the Development background. On February 4, 1998 the Planning Commission held a Development review of the proposed Saturn Project. At this meeting it was decided that the neighbors within a 350 feet of the proposed project would be notified and given a chance to meet with Planning Commission to discuss the Development. The original site plan, which had been approved in 1996 is being modified so that the new plans will include added showroom space, service bays and a car wash. All work in the new development will be to the east of the existing building, with the exception of the car wash. The primary issues with this development are availability of parking, site lighting and the possibility of combining the parcels for tax purposes, and the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) might require on-site stormwater storage. The revised site plan dated February 12, 1998, shows all of the requested changes have been made with regard to the parking counts, handicapped stalls, garbage dumpster enclosure details and the change to the sign fronting Highway 10. Saturn Development is in the process of working with Ramsey County to resolve the issue of combining the three lots into one for tax purposes. A February 25, 1998 meeting with the RCWD is scheduled to resolve the stormwater drainage details. All conditions of the CUP have been met, with the exception of the 10 percent of the property, excluding setback requirements. The Planning Commission indicated the property already had an extraordinary amount of setback from Highway 10 and the greenspace therein could apply toward the 10 percent, thereby fulfilling the requirement. Mounds View Planning Commission February 4, 1998 • Regular Meeting Page 7 Michael Chen, representing Benshoof& Associates, traffic consultants, addressed the Commission and stated that the study area and scope of the traffic study were determined by the areas that would be affected by closing off Eastwood Drive at County Road I. Areas south of this would not be affected. Mr. Chen stated the study shows that closing off Eastwood and adding the Walgreen project, 18 cars an hour would be added to the traffic flow on Greenwood Drive. Ms. Polachek King stated the study time was too short to get a good average. Ms. Keyes stated the traffic on Greenwood is much heavier in the summer because of the recreation that is taking place in Hillview Park. She , too, said she didn't think the traffic count was accurate. Mr. Chen stated the Walgreen project would generate an additional 56 cars that would enter into the Highway 10 County Road I intersection during the p.m. peak hour. This is 1.2 percent of the total traffic that is in this intersection on any given day. • John Wiens, 7760 Greenwood Drive, questioned Mr. Chen's figures and stated his concerns about the accuracy of the study. Mr. Chen stated when the 610-118 connector is completed, in 1999, there will be a significant decrease in traffic on Highway 10. This will make Highway 10 a safer road to travel. Chairperson Peterson said he was very concerned about pedestrian safety and was disappointed when the pedestrian bridge over Highway 10 was canceled. Commissioner Obert agreed. Mr. Chen told the Commission at 714 cars per day, Greenwood Drive is well within the Metropolitan Council's definition of maximum traffic for a residential street's traffic count for any given day. . Ms. Keyes said she would like to know the increased cost for the City to maintain the roads that are affected by the increased traffic. She asked if this information could be brought to the next meeting that was held in regards to the Walgreen project. Mr. Johnson asked if it would be possible to put funds in escrow to protect the residents from water damage caused by unforeseeable flooding of the Walgreen property and its effect on the adjoining residential properties. Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 1998 Special Meeting Page 8 7. Planning Case No. 507-97 2625 Highway 10, 7715-7761 Eastwood Road Applicant: TOLD Development, for Walgreen's Discussion Regarding Walgreen's Development Request, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning. Associate Ericson addressed the Commission and citizens stating the Planning Commission is charged with the task of deciding whether or not it would be appropriate to rezone residential properties and amend the comprehensive plan to allow for the development of a Walgreen's store at the northeast corner of Highway 10 and County Road I. He added, the staff is seeking direction from the Planning Commission with regard to drafting a resolution recommending either approval or denial of the rezoning and comprehensive plan amendment request. Associate Ericson gave a background review of the proposal as follows: TOLD Development has purchase agreements in force for the properties located at 2625 highway 10, and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road. The property fronting highway 10 at this location is owned by the City while the four single-family properties along Eastwood road are•under separate ownership. The applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, major subdivision and development review for the stated properties. In addition, the applicant requests the street bisecting these parcels(Eastwood Road)be vacated and replace with a cul-de-sac. The current zoning is split with the City-owned parcel zoned R-3, Medium Density Residential and the parcels on Eastwood Road being zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The proposed zoning is B-2, Neighborhood Commercial, which would allow the Walgreen use or similar uses such as financial institutions, office building, floral shop, hardware store or off-sale liquor sales. It is staffs recommendation to continue the open discussion process to a future meeting or meetings. The Planning Commission is being asked to provide direction to staff and the developer if additional information is needed. Commissioner Obert observed the absence of comments that address the citizen's concerns in regards to property values. A second issue, as discussed in an earlier Planning Commission meeting, was researching the City's police reports in order to get some kind of factual basis for assessing the traffic accident occurrences in the area of the development. Obert added, as did the other Commissioners, that no matter which way the decision goes on the development, the City would not be able to please all of the residents 410 affected by this project. It is very critical to the success of the project that the discussions that take place in regard to the Walgreen project be based on fact and not emotion, Obert said. Mounds View Planning Commission February 4, 1998 0 Regular Meeting Page 9 There being no further business before the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission Chairperson Peterson adjourned the meeting at 9:50 p.m. Respectfully bmitted, Vii, 14-i6 Rick Jopke Communi Development Director S • 0 Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 1998 Special Meeting Page 10 Chairperson Peterson asked Chen to summarize what the traffic study was indicating. Mr. Chen told the Commission the traffic study indicated the overall impact of the Walgreen's Development is not expected to have a significant negative impact on traffic to the affected neighborhood with the closing of Eastwood Drive. Mr. Johnson stated he has lived in the neighborhood for 29 years, before the shopping center was developed, before any of the commercial developments on this section of Highway 10 came into being. He suggested dividing County Road I so that traffic could enter the Walgreen facility from the left only. This would prevent cars coming down Eastwood from turning into the facility and causing a traffic bottleneck in this area. Associate Ericson told Johnson Ramsey County had received a copy of the development plan for informational purposes. The City is looking for some type of input from the County for the Walgreen development. Mr. Cunningham told the Commission as the developer he would be reluctant to accept the development condition that there be a right-in right-out turn scenario established for County Road I. Associate Ericson told the Commission it might not be the City's choice because of the fact that County Road I is a county road. He added the City would not force this type of a condition on the developer or the site plan. Mr. Chen added the spacing between Walgreen's main access, the Mounds View Center access, and the Highway 10 intersection all conform to the spacing specifications that have been established by MnDOT. Chairperson Peterson commented the light timing cycle on Highway 10's traffic signals should be modified to improve the traffic flow through Mounds View. Chairperson Peterson suggested the discussion get back to the subject of the "big picture," this being commercial development versus residential on the corner properties that are being considered for the Walgreen development. He added there are some early leanings that have surfaced in the community meetings. It seems like the citizens want any commercial developments to take place on the Highway 10 corridor and any residential developments to take place off of the Highway 10 corridor. The City needs to improve its tax base. Commissioner Obert, again, emphasized the importance of addressing the question of decreasing property values and addressing the traffic safety issues within the City. Commissioner Brasaemle readdressed the question: "Is this the appropriate piece of Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 1998 Special Meeting Page 11 • property for his development?" He said he did not have a good answer for this question and probably wouldn't have one until after the next Comprehensive Plan Update meeting, where this particular piece of property was going to be discussed in regards to its fit in the overall Comprehensive Plan. Chairperson Peterson told the Commission one of the comments the citizens have been making at the community meetings concerning the Comprehensive Plan Update is they have no interest in having any more commercial businesses along County Road I. The citizens are saying that nobody should be forced out of their homes on Highway 10 to accommodate more commercial business. The question was posed to each of the Commissioners: Do you have any strong feelings one way or the other in regards to the Walgreen Development location? Commissioner Obert said that the development would be in the Highway 10 corridor, as the citizens have requested, and he tended to be in favor of the location. Commissioner Johnston agreed and added that making Eastwood a cul-de-sac would improve the traffic conditions of the area. • Commissioner Brasaemle told the Commission at this time he does not have strong feelings about the issue. He said he needed more time and more information in order to form a sound opinion. • Director Jopke asked the Commission if there is some information that the staff could provide to make the issue more clear. Commissioner Brasaemle requested the County's traffic information on County Road I. Commissioner Obert agreed and added there is a need for the proper real estate appraisal of the affected properties. Associate Ericson reminded the Commission the next Comprehensive Plan Update meeting is scheduled for March 11, 1998, to be held at the Edgewood School. The focus will be on District No. 2. Chairperson Peterson stated three agenda items for the next Planning Commission meeting: 1. Property value appraisal • 2. Traffic issues 3. livability of the development area Item No. SC Meeting Date: 3-23-98 Type of Business: CA WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council Item Title/ Subject: Licenses for Approval Date of Report: March 17, 1998 LICENSES FOR APPROVAL General(Commercial) - expires June 30, 1998 Appearance Plus, Inc. -New McGough Construction Co. -New MSP Construction, Inc. -New HVAC - expires June 30, 1998 • The Maintenance Team, Inc. -New Item No. 6D Staff Report No. Meeting Date: March 23, 1998 Type of Business: CA WK:Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and Council Members From: Mary Saarion, Director of Parks, Recreation SL Forestry Item Title/Subject: Request Council authorization to replace the Cable TV Tape Recorder Play/Record to be funded with Cable TV Franchise fee funds. Date of Report: March 17, 1998 • The video tape recorder play/record editing deck is a very important piece of machinery in the Cable TV system. It is the machine that allows editing and replay functions. The present video tape recorder editing deck is 9 years old and is not functioning properly. It has been brought in for repair but repairs have been unsuccessful. The editing deck needs to be replaced as soon as possible. Patrick Toth has received three verbal quotes for new Panasonic AG DS555 which is a play/record, industrial video tape recorder used for editing programs. Listed below are four quotes for this industrial production type machine (which is much different than a home video tape recorder and is likewise much more expensive). The Cable TV interface is a necessary component of this equipment: ID Audio Visual, Inc. - quoted the Video Tape Recorder at $3,600 with $650 for the cable interface and tax of$276.25 for a total cost of$4,526.25. •AudioVisual Wholesalers - quoted the Video Tape Recorder at $3,700 with $600 for cable interface and tax of$279.50 for a total cost of$4,579.50. Blumberg A/V- quoted the Video Tape Recorder at $4,000 with $625 for cable interface and tax of $300.63 for a total cost of$4,925.63. Stage One Supply- quoted the Video Tape Recorder at $3,800 with cable interface at $625 and tax of$287.63 for a total of$4,712.63. The company with the lowest cost is AVI at$4,526.25. There are sufficient funds in the Cable TV Franchise Fee fund available for replacement of Cable TV equipment. The video tape recorder editing deck was not intended for replacement this year and thus is not in the 1998 capital needs budget. However, circumstances are such that the video tape recorder editing deck is not functioning and cannot be repaired and needs immediate replacement for continued cable tv programming. Recommendation: Authorize staff to purchase a new industrial record/play video tape recorder at the cost of$ 4,526.25 plus shipping charges from AVI to be funded with Cable Franchise Fee Funds. Item No. Staff Report No. Meeting Date: March 23, 1998 • Type of Business: CA WK:Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor McCarty and Council Members From: Mary Saarion, Director of Parks, Recreation &.Forestry Item Title/Subject: Request authorization to enter into contract agreements for 1998 tree removal services. Date of Report: March 16, 1998 As Forester Wriskey's attached memo details, three firms provided quotes for 1998 tree removal services. Forester Wriskey confirms one firm offers the lowest price for accessible trees and another firm offers a lowest price for no access removals. The costs are approximately 3% lower than 1997 costs. It is recommended that the City contract for services with River Junction for accessible tree removals and Miller Tree Service for unaccessible tree removals. Recommendation: Authorize staff to enter into a contract for services with River Junction Tree Service for removal of accessible trees at $10.55 /diameter inch and Miller Tree Service for unaccessible tree removals at $16.30/diameter inch. • Item No. 5i Staff Report No. Meeting Date: March 23, 1998 • Type of Business: CA WK:Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:CouncilBusiness City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor McCarthy and Council Member From: Mary Saarian, Director of Parks, Recreation & Forestry Item Title/Subject: Request authorization to transfer 1997 Mounds View Community Theater revenues to Western Bank in the MCT checking account. Date of Report: March 16, 1998 Mounds View Community Theater was incorporated this past Fall, 1997 and is now a self-sustaining community organization. As a result of incorporation, Mounds View Community Theater will no longer be a program funded through the Recreation Activity Fund. Instead, MVCT will have their own checking account at Western Bank. MVCT Board of Directors has requested that the revenues from the 1997 production of"Guys and Dolls" be forwarded to the MVCT bank account at Western Bank so that MVCT has sufficient money for this year's production expenses which are incurred before performance revenues are received. The amount of revenues from 1997 to be transferred is $1,526. Recommendation: Staff requests Council's authorization to transfer$1,526 from Recreation Activity Fund which is revenues received from the MVCT 1997 performance of"Guys and Dolls"to the MVCT checking account at Western Bank. • • Item No. 5 Staff Report No. Meeting Date: 3/23/98 • Type of Business: CA WK:: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council Members From: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Extension of Time frame to File Development Stage Plan for Anthony Properties Project Date of Report: March 13, 1998 Background: On May 12, 1997 the city approved a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, and general concept PUD plan for the Anthony Properties Project. The City's PUD ordinance in 1120.04 Subdivision 2 d. indicates: "Unless a development stage plan has been filed within nine (9) months from the date City Council grants general concept plan approval the approval may be revoked by City Council action. The City council, at its discretion, may extend the filing deadline for a development stage plan when, for good cause shown, such extension is necessary. The nine month Time frame expired on February 12, 1998. Anthony Properties submitted a development 41) stage plan on March 16, 1998. Analysis: The delay in submitting the development stage plan was in part due to the discussions with the City concerning the ring road concept and also because of the discussions with MnDOT concerning the signal on Highway 10. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council pass a motion extending the deadline for Anthony Properties to file a development stage plan from February 12, 1998 to March 16, 1998. Rick Jopke, Co unity Development Director N:IDATAIUSERS\RICKJO\SHARE\032398.RPT Item No. _SJ Staff Report No. Meeting Date:3/23/98 Type of Business: CA WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business Ci of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council Members From: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Extension of Time frame to File Final Plat for the Everest Building N Project Date of Report: March 13, 1998 Background: On October 27, 1997 the city approved a fmal plat for Mounds View Business Park East 2ND Addition presented by the Everest Group,Ltd. to facilitate the development of Building N. The plat has not yet been filed. The City's subdivision code in 1202.07 Subdivision 4 states: "If the final plat is approved,the subdivider shall,within one hundred twenty(120)days,record it with the County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles ". The 120 day deadline occurred on February 25, 1998. The City's subdivision code in 1202 .07 Subdivision 5 states: "in the event the plat is not recordable as approved or the subdivider fails to record within the time prescribed herein,the Council may re- approve the final plat upon the following terms and conditions:a)that the subdivider proves to the • satisfaction of the council that the delay was caused by conditions beyond the control of the subdivider, and b)that the extension of the time request has or will have no adverse effect on the City or property owners of the City, and that the Council shall set the time limit of the extension requested but in no event shall it exceed one hundred twenty(120) days. Everest has requested a one hundred twenty(120)day extension. Analysis: Everest has not provided information on the reason for the delay. It is staffs opinion that the extension would have no impact or adverse effect on the City or property owners of the City. The 120 day extension request is the maximum allowed. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council pass a motion extending the deadline for Everest Group to record the final plat from February 25, 1998 to June 25, 1998. Rick Jopke, Co 'ty Development Director N:\DATA\USERS\RICKJO\SHARE\32398A.RPT [Draft #1] ORDINANCE NO. 612- CITY 12- CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO NOISE CONTROL REGULATIONS AND AMENDING TITLE 600, SECTION 607.07, SUBDIVISION 2 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Title 607.07, Subd. 2 of the Mounds View Municipal code shall be amended to read: 607.07: NOISE CONTROL REGULATIONS: • Subd. 2. Loud Or Disturbing Noises Enumerated; Restrictions: The following acts set forth in the following paragraphs are declared to be loud, disturbing and unnecessary noises in violation of this Section, but said enumeration shall not be deemed to be exclusive: a. Construction Or Repairing Of Buildings: The erection, including excavating, demolition, alteration or repair of any building between the hours of ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and six o'clock(6:00) A.M. on weekdays and all day Sunday, except where single individuals or families work on single-family residences for their own occupancy owned by them; except, that the Clerk Administrator may, or a designee, in case of emergency, grant permission to repair at any time when the Clerk-Administrator finds such repair work will not affect the health and safety of persons in the vicinity. b. ..Nighttime Noise In Residential Areas; Parties: (1) No person shall, between the hours of ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and seven(7:00)A.M., participate in any loud party or gathering of people from which noise emanates of a sufficient volume as to disturb the peace, quiet or repose of persons residing in any residential area. • (2) Loud noises between the hours of ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and seven o'clock (7:00) A.M. of such volume as to be plainly audible at a distance of one SJR137983 MU125-32 /o [Draft #1] ORDINANCE NO. 1,13 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ANIMALS AND ANIMAL CONTROL AND AMENDING TITLE 700, SECTION 701.03, SUBDIVISION 1, SUBDIVISION 7, AND INCLUDING A NEW SUBDIVISION 16 IN THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Title 701.03, Subd. 1.a. of the Mounds View Municipal code shall be amended to read: Subd. 1. Definitions: When used in this Section, the following words and • phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this subdivision: a. RUNNING AT LARGE: Any dog which is not either: (1) Effectively contained within a fenced area on private property; or (2) Effectively restrained by chain or lease to private property with the consent of the property owner; or (3) Effectively restrained by a chain or leash not exceeding six (6) feet in length. SECTION 2. Title 701.03, Subd. 7.d. of the Mounds View Municipal code shall be amended to read: Subd. 7. Impoundment and Redemption Procedures: d. Disposition of Unclaimed Dogs: Any dog which is not claimed or redeemed as provided in subdivision 6c above within five (5) days after impounding, may be sold at a fair and reasonable price to anyone desiring to purchase the dog if not requested by a Iicensed educational or scientific • institution under Minnesota Statutes 35.71. All sums received above the costs and license fee shall be held by the Clerk-Administrator for the benefit of the owner and, if not claimed in one year, such funds shall be placed in the General Fund of the Municipality. Any dog which is not SJR137985 MU125-32 Item No. /v Staff Report No. Meeting Date: March 23, 1998 • Type of Business: C.B. WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda; CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution No. 5213 Authorizing a Supplemental Feasibility Study for the Proposed Reconstruction of Spring Lake Road / County Road I Project Date of Report: March 20, 1998 At the March 9, 1998 Council meeting, staff was directed to provide estimates and related information in regards to a new street design for the proposed reconstruction or Spring Lake Road and County Road I. The following design will be studied and a supplement provided to the original feasibility report. Spring Lake Road will be constructed at a width of 28 feet from face of curb(FOC)to face of curb the entire length, except for the portion north of County Rd. I in the vicinity of Spring Lake, where right of way limitations exist, limiting any widening. There will be no detached sidewalk/trailway in the sections of 28 foot construction. County Road I will be constructed the entire length at width of 26 feet wide measured from FOC to FOC, with a detached 9 foot sidewalk/trailway constructed in the north right of way. Spring Lake Road will also have a detached path from County I around Spring Lake. Staff spoke with the City Attorney in regards to this procedure in identifying a new project and proceeding with the Charter and Code requirements. Mr. Riggs indicated that a resolution authorizing a supplemental feasibility report including the new design with the current design would be required and an additional pubic hearing and notice for the newly identified project was also necessary. The first resolution is attached for Council's consideration. The resolution setting a public hearing will be presented to Council for consideration after the supplemental feasibility report is received and accepted by Council. The total estimated project cost and unit cost must be included in the resolution that sets the public hearing. It appears that the earliest a public hearing on the new project can be held will be on May 26, 1998, if Council follows the established schedule of regular Council Business Meetings. Since the time of the meeting, staff has been contacted by Michael Findorff, who is a staff engineer with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Mr. Findorff indicated an interest in the proposed project and the agency's possible requirements of a storm water detention pond in the Spring Lake area. Mr. Findorff indicated that the agency had received numerous calls regarding this issue and would like to meet staff at the site. On Monday, March 16, 1998, Steve Campbell, Rocky Keene of SEH and myself met Mr. Findorff, Ms. Haake, Ms. • Malrick, and Mayor McCarty at the site. Explanations were given to the requirements of the MPCA permits for storm water quality ponds and construction projects. If the vacate lot located RESOLUTION NO. 5213 111 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A SUPPLEMENTAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF SPRING LAKE ROAD AND COUNTY ROAD I WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mounds View is considering to reconstruct Spring Lake Road from County Road H to Hillview Road and from TH 10 to County Road J and County Road I from Pleasantview Drive to Silver Lake Road; and WHEREAS, an initial feasibility study was conducted and accepted for the original design, and; WHEREAS, the proposed design has changed to include the following street width designs and sidewalk/trailway construction: Spring Lake Road will be constructed at a width of 28 feet measured from face of curb (FOC) to face of curb the entire length, except for the portion north of County Rd. I in the . vicinity of Spring Lake, where right of way limitations exist . This segment will be 26 feet FOC to FOC. There will be no • detached sidewalk / trailway in the sections of 28 foot construction. County Road I will be constructed the entire length at width of 26 feet wide measured from FOC to FOC, with a detached 9 foot sidewalk / trailway constructed in the north right of way. Spring Lake Road will also have a detached path • from County I around Spring Lake, and; WHEREAS, this project is proposed to be assessed to the benefitted properties in accordance with Chapter 202 of the Municipal Code and the City Charter; and WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Turnback funds available for the reconstruction of these two roads will be applied to the residents half of the expense of the project; and WHEREAS, a feasibility study is necessary and required to continue with the project; and WHEREAS, the feasibility study will provide a means to obtain a cost estimate which shall set forth the cost of the improvement in both unit price, total cost, and an estimated mock assessment roll . 411 RESOLUTION NO. 4825 111 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 4821 ADOPTING • STREET STANDARDS WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View will adopt the following street standards; and WHEREAS, the adoption of street standards will aid in reconstructing streets that will safely and in the most efficient manner accommodate multi-model transportation and parking; and WHEREAS, all street reconstructed will have B618 curb and gutter and the recommended standard width will be 30 feet measured from face of curb to face of curb; and WHEREAS, should circumstances exist that would greatly increase the construction cost, or be determined to be a detriment to the neighborhood such as, but not limited to, a higher than normal amount of relocation of underground utilities, loss of an extremely high amount of mature trees, additional landscaping • ► required such as timber walls, or reductions of driveway slopes, the street may be constructed to a minimum width of 28 feet as determined by the a Feasibility Study ao outlincd in Mounds Vicw Municipal Codc Chaptcr 202 and approval of the majority of the property owners on the affected street; and WHEREAS, if a street is constructed at a width of 28 feet, parking will be restricted to one side; and WHEREAS, streets designated as Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets will be constructed in accordance with MSA standards of 26 feet No Parking Both Sides, 32 feet Parking One Side, 38 feet Parking Both Sides, to receive funding and will be assessed only for the recommended width; and WHEREAS, when a street is proposed to be reconstructed a neighborhood informational meeting will be held to inform the residents of the extent of the improvements; and WHEREAS, the majority of the affected properties within the entire project may elect to reconstruct the street wider than the recommended width, and will be assessed for the entire width. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council . of the City of Mounds View adopts a recommended street width of 30 feet measured from face of curb to face of curb. rl 7 . 8 meters and with no parking lane or with a maximum width of 14 .7 meters with parking available on one side of the street , the chargeable length allowed for municipal state-aid street length purposes is one-half of the length of the one-way street . SA: MS s 161 . 082 ; 161. 083 ; 162 .02 ; 162 .09 ; 162 . 155; Laws 1983 c 17 HIST: 8 SR 2146 ; 15 SR 2596; 20 SR 1041 8820_0700 SELECTION CRITERIA. Subpart 1 . Basis. A state-aid route must be selected on the basis of all criteria in either subpart 2 or 3 . Subp. 2 . County state-aid highway_ A county state-aid highway may be selected if it : A. is projected to carry a relatively heavier traffic volume or is functionally classified as collector or arterial as identified on the county' s functional classification plan; B. connects towns, communities, shipping points , and markets within a county or in adjacent counties; provides acceJs to rural churches, schools, community meeting halls, industrial areas , state institutions, and recreational areas; or, serves as a principal rural mail route and school bus route; and C. provides an integrated and coordinated highway system affording, within practical limits, a state-aid highway network consistent with projected traffic demands . Subp. 3 . Municipal state-aid street. A municipal state-aid street may be selected if it: • A. is projected to carry a relatively heavier traffic volume or is functionally classified as collector or arterial as identified on the urban municipality' s functional classification plan; B. connects the points of major traffic interest, parks, parkways, or recreational areas within an urban municipality; and C. provides an integrated street system affording, within practical limits, a state-aid street network consistent with projected traffic demands . SA: MS s 161.082 ; 161 .083 ; 162.02; 162 .09; 162 . 155 ; Laws 1983 c 17 HIST: 8 SR 2146; 15 SR 2596; 20 SR 1041 8820.0800 ROUTE DESIGNATIONS_ . - .. rt 1. Resolution and certification. With regar• route des • ions, county state-aid highways and „ cipal state-aid street • t be selected by the re - ive boards o county commissioners or -rning bo. . - . • urban fjOk (municipalities . The highway o •F -+ eet selections must be 1ij • 1,, reviewed by the distri ate-aid eng of that area and the • engineer ' s reco " - .ation must be filed with ommissioner . Upon prel ary approval of the commissioner , the r- - -ctive boar. -. or governing bodies shall establish the route by 7 ('(111fTh t77C fic•T" "Of- "TA PC I Of.'TT TUT (.0 OT .r•n 8820.0300 (Repealed by amendment, 8 SR 2146] 8820.0400 LOCAL HIGHWAY AND STREET DEPARTMENTS. Each county and each urban municipality shall establish and 411 maintain a highway or street department . These departments must be adequately organized, staffed, and equipped to administer for the county or urban municipality matters relating to the operations of the state-aid program and to exercise all functions incidental thereto, in accordance with law. preparation of plans and specifications and supervision of construction and maintenance must be under the control and direction of a professional engineer , registered in the state of Minnesota and employed or retained for that purpose. SA: MS s 161.082 ; 161. 083 ; 162 .02; 162 . 09 ; 162 . 155; Laws 1983 c 17 HIST: 8 SR 2146 8820.0500 SELECTION AND DESIGNATION OF STATE-AID SYSTEMS. The state-aid highways and streets designated to form the basis for a long-range improvement program must be so selected as to form an integrated network of highways and streets in accordance with parts 8820 .0600 to 8820 . 0800 . SA: MS s 161 .082 ; 161 .083 ; 162 . 02; 162 .09 ; 162 . 155 ; Laws 1983 c 17 HIST: 8 SR 2146 40 8820.0600 SELECTION OF ROUTES. Final selection of routesto be included in the respective county state-aid and municipal state-aid systems are subject to the approval of the commissioner . These routes may be established on new locations where no existing roadway exists or may be located upon or over an established roadway or specified portion of a roadway. The highway and street systems to be selected and designated in accordance with law are: A. a county state-aid highway system of a size determined by the county screening board, excluding the length of former trunk highways that have reverted to the county pursuant to law on and after July 1 , 1965 , and the length of former municipal state-aid streets in cities whose population fell below 5,000 under the 1980 or 1990 federal census; and B. a municipal state-aid street system not exceeding 20 percent of the total length of city streets and county roads within the jurisdiction of. an urban municipality plus the length of all trunk highways reverted or turned back to the I '� jurisdiction of the urban municipality pursuant to law on and after July 1, 1965, plus the length of county highways reverted or turned back to the jurisdiction of the urban municipality pursuant to law on or after May 11, 1994 . 110 For an undivided, one-way street with a minimum width of 6 Item No. 78 Staff Report No. Meeting Date: March 23, 1998 • Type of Business: CB WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:ConsentAgenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Jim Ericson, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution 5215, a Resolution Approving a Wetland Buffer Permit for the Silverview Estates PUD, Planning Case 519-98 Date of Report: March 19, 1998 Project Summary: Silverview Estates Inc. has requested that the City approve a wetland buffer permit to allow for development within the 100-foot buffer surrounding the wetland. The approved development stage plans show two buildings partially within the buffer and a third completely within the buffer, as well as approximately 7,000 square feet of parking area, 2,000 square feet of sidewalk/patio • area, a gazebo and the south driveway into the senior building. Regulatory Background: The City reviews all development that occurs within wetlands and their buffers because of the important role that wetlands play in maintaining the ecosystem and the area hydrology, in that they are critical to the present and future health, safety and general welfare of the land, animals and people within the City. Any existing and potential development within the City and the Rice Creek Watershed pose increasing economic and ecologic demands, potentially despoiling, polluting or negatively altering wetlands and their contributory function and benefit to the City. According to Chapter 1010 of the Municipal Code relating to the Wetland Zoning District and the recently-adopted Ordinance No. 602 amending Chapter 1010, any work occurring within the 100- foot buffer surrounding a wetland or within a wetland itself requires either a wetland buffer or wetland alteration permit. In addition, approvals must be obtained from Rice Creek Watershed District, the local government regulatory agency overseeing wetlands and other hydrological features. Analysis: The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and finds that the level of encroachment should not negatively impact the wetland or reduce the existing water quality enhancement value of the . wetland under conditions of ultimate development, as long as certain protective measures are involved, such as a minimum 10-foot wide strip of natural vegetation around the wetland. 03/19/1998 16:00 4835642 ROYAL OAKS REALTY IN PAGE 02 '(r artes iiadott ?612 941 1667 J 11/14/97 012:06 PM Dill o CR FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL .11 DATE: Friday, November 14, 1997 • i TO: MARCEL EIBENSTEINER, 11 ROYAL OAKS REALTY L., FAX NUMBER: 4835642 1111 ..: PAGES (INCLUDING THIS COVER}: 1 L.; ... ARCHITECT FROM: Charles Radioff 9979 VALLEY VIEW ROAD VOICE 612 941 1667 SUITE 0256 FAX 612 941 5240 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 E-Mail eradloft@wlnternet.com MEMO: Nov., 14, 1997 Mike Black Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. • 4196 Lexington Avenue Shoreview, MN 55126 Silverview Estates PUD Mounds view, Minn. RE: Impervious area within 100 foot buffer area Area of 100 foot buffer 83,234 sq ft Impervious areas within buffer area 34,054 sq ft ( f 6/1,,1) • I Resolution 5215 Silverview Estates Wetland Buffer Permit March 23, 1998 • Page 2 WHEREAS,the quality of water infiltrated to the wetland will be enhanced by the three NURP ponds and the strip of natural vegetation between the buildings and the wetland. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the Wetland Buffer Permit requested by Silverview Estates Inc. contingent upon the following: 1. Plans and supporting documentation for controlling erosion shall be provided by the applicant and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. 2. The pervious surface areas of the lots shall be sodded or landscaped (up to the ten- foot natural vegetation strip along the wetland)to prevent substantial soil loss from the site. This will need to be accomplished before certificates of occupancy are issued. 3. Only clean fill, substantially free of chemical pollutants and contaminants, shall be brought onto the site. • 4. The minimum elevation for the buildings on this site shall not be less than 908.2 as • specified in the City's Local Water Management Plan. 5. No waste--solid, hazardous or otherwise--shall be allowed to enter directly or indirectly into the wetland. • Adopted this 23rd day of March, 1998. Duane McCarty, Mayor ATTEST: Charles S. Whiting, City Clerk/Administrator N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\519-98\5215CC.RES • 7 r View esivaI , d st ! Inch (.20 47-----1-A' Sharie Linke, President U : Theresa Cermak, Vice President Kathy Harrer, Secretary Jean Kassim, Treasurer 0. 40 March 12, 1998 _ 4111W Mr. Chuck Whiting, Clerk-Administrator City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Chuck: On behalf of Mounds View Festival, Inc., I am requesting a permit for the committee to sponsor a "Beer Garden"the day of the Festival in the Park, Sunday, July 12, 1998. The committee • has requested permission to sell 3-2 beer in a confined area for individuals 21 and over. Sale would begin after 12:00 noon on the day of the event. The "Beer Garden" would be estab- lished in the following manner: .1. A canopy would be erected as the designated "Beer Garden". 2. The area would be fenced in and no beer consumption would be allowed outside that area. 3. Before anyone is allowed to enter the fenced in area, their identification would be checked by experienced security staff(provided by the Mermaid). Those of age would have their hands stamped or be given a wrist band to indicate they are of age. NO ONE WILL BE ALLOWED TO PURCHASE BEER WITHOUT IT. 4. Security staff will make sure patrons stay within the "Beer Garden" while consuming beer. No one will be allowed to become intoxicated or beligerent. Anyone causing problems will be escorted out of the park. We do not anticipate any problems but are approaching this with caution. 5. The Festival, Inc. committee will provide dram shop insurance coverage for the event as required by the City Council. i 2319 Knoll Drive • Mounds View, MN 55112 Telephone No. (612) 786-4696 Fax No. (612) 717-4398 • MEMORANDUM TO: Bruce Kessel FROM: Scott Riggs DATE: March 20, I998 RE: Necessary Changes to Permit Beer Garden Bruce: Per your request, here is a summary memorandum of the issues involved and/or changes necessary to permit a "beer garden" on City park property. Please note that I have also briefly discussed this matter with Chuck Whiting. In order to facilitate the Festival-in-the-Park "beer garden," changes to the following Municipal • Code sections appear to be required, depending upon what type of license the event sponsor desires: Code Section 909.07, Subd. 11 would have to be modified to permit alcoholic beverages in whatever City park is to be utilized for the event. The City's Code Section 50 no longer 50103, Subd. 3, as to temporary non-intoxicating [this term is permitted by state statute and should be changed to "3.2 percent malt liquor." see Minn. Stat. § 340A.411. Subd. 3] license would have to be possibly modified as to the length of time the entity requesting the license has been in existence (a requirement not found in state statute) and possibly as to the location of the event. See Minn. Stat. § 340A.403. Subd. 2]. Code Section 502.03. Subd. 6. as to a temporary intoxicating liquor special event license would have to be modified possibly as to the location of the event. Please note however, that the length of time the entity requesting this license has been in existence cannot be less than three (3) years for this license based upon the City Code and state statute. See Minn. Stat. § 340A.404, Subd. 101. This section also permits a licensee to contract for intoxicating liquor catering services. Depending upon the location of the event, Code Section 502.15, as to zoning restrictions. 1111/ SJR16o2n7 *rt1125-b5 S2 -d 90/Zo'd 9517-1 alEB1EEZt9 N3AYND V Aa3NN3N-word wd25: a 96-0Z—JEy I • and Code Section 502.04. Subd. 2.c. and Code Section 503.04. Subd. 2.c. & d., as to • licensing restrictions. may also have to be addressed. As an alternative to the above noted options. Code Section 502.03. Subd. 7 provides for the issuance of a temporary intoxicating liquor banquet license, which can be issued to a holder of an on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by the City or an adjacent city. subject to the requirements(similar to those contained in the above referenced code sections)of the subdivision. as well as the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 340A.404, Subd. 4(a). Additionally, a new Municipal Code section could also be created to encompass the authority contained in Minn. Stat. § 340A.404, Subd. 4(b) as to a retail on-sale intoxicating liquor licensee's ability to make off premise sales at a community festival. It should be determined if either Code Section 502.03. Subd. 7 or the new Minn. Stat. § 340A.404. Subd. 4(b) ate viable alternatives to the above noted license options. In addition to the necessary code changes, another issue the City should review is whether or not the event sponsor and the City have appropriate levels of liability insurance to cover such an event (does the City's policy cover such an event, etc.). Sec Minn. Stat. § 340A.409. For your reference I have enclosed the above noted statutes. Please feel free to contact me with any further questions you may have regarding this matter. • Scott Riggs cc: Chuck Whiting Bob Long • SOP140217 ran?s.65 9Zr—d B0/E0'd 95V-1 OlEB2EEZI9 N3AVNO 7 A03NN3N—Wold md25:10 86-0Z-1eIl • e , - Q� � t 1 ali 1 i � •rtqg �41oo h _ � 8. ? g 3gg g s omito-�.. a ,►� - •t. ,;..,-.1{i} 12 i e"- SOT `. ' Iti 0 '" Z ' . 1.argpt . 7- C 1 . 4.111� C .r ee" ; r0 G•u4_ Rs j �,z tl+ 4 'O ? ` O � a` 11 • i itw I ilei 5.� e r r' N^ - Fit . o ra • 5 g • t 3 ; „�, a sq lvig ! t i b l f. � _ g•°,: -eir eg c. 1.1.f e 9 �-P ; ili � byi. c� E ItSb � .�. r, 1-2,- . .i. � ilk . li s 81 ilig - p 0, 4 O 6�� $$gg.5. $ tre L hg Is ii tc. ..t. _it g ,. c,.. otF 1 ; .. ..li 1p w _.-11 I. . .ror, 1 o 11111 1141r =33 il OS R-3 IN A ice ; i li 14 'e • rt iti 41 .4 ;Ili ga ;g gsDe • - .$ ngO hi $ n3SO asE . _ . r ; e :Feb 4 § koEIF U. MEI il 1:5 t Hil ill Pim tre lit Mtn ti • i a QKtigtra sv: :. 0211 A.2 ; a orF ow .r sv9 . _.2 . 2 e E� g. iliwtips.a. „.E 3° .,,v s• $ s4 qvill; .t. €. gi g tal .2 S Er=•;7ua231a - vigwillit •EF34. rolvtigli* ds14 04 P i ifliD'q 1 ,1 , ;, - 3 . ^.E - lie 1- i 12: Or ri - . a Eze. i 814 ... gig . %e 1g. a 's6-44 •e_. o� 8,1 —g It2 he e �'•$ � -1 „ av�� � a� g$ .��r .S. � -. � t�e ; �'. •y° a �� e tea G P� G WF t ni. Lam' S C 1 '[. $ O S ilk 1. FF1. . `3,: " ; t`5 2, e . i_ 'p.R vE. 5 P.. ��i -a �le $ �r �• °�'� vp g i'. ! ��e �e ... .� gii• . ` .�v iir � �pjai~ gz ia � o i *ligt.0 =ig -.'"' 1 §E2 fa ; lk 2 * e. Vti ..,-g krig Q - a ..g a1�e -. : x `5 . A ,< t w. ;16. § a ,p - 4- E. o P a Fr Cpt o.?i- g !.. g. r t . A ,.....2 am trig r • Eg ji E'S ilitggg - & s• EE _o 91 fig fditrlrll1i} IP fail i 'firilIPøilIHliuI r ii C if r •uQw 111'1 de lit 8 @ l. E 1 5ZP-d 80/P0'd 9P-1 01S61SEZ19 N3AV49 7 da3NN3N-WOJd md8S: Q 88-0Z-Jofl • . n VII ii.Hill in um q it It: ligKeity 1 ..... t _ to o 2 _:...n on 2' t s �, SW -K I• a K -lit a S.K b > rrK glf r.4 O ? iir. ,0 'clei - g oVS3 � Rim ass .g111111 ga ` 12 21.82 . •eg 'e '•al ,s, i • I1PH1 iliflul ( 01.IH!1E[jIj IIih:IHui 11.9 � N ss T. � g _� ; g 5•tz.p :, �} ?..51; Eg. , 'Cgg 8 ° g Z'• '~ > I V ma• • Igii ffl:ni -4110 ::12' 2.? W qIH 6 CC c5 it 1n" 2Gs a!ifIt,-. t4 :1. Ft. kii.F 6*. gl ' 2.1 El tsgi', 5 o're'sa 2 hiuiiILt i ? ',`74 it,€ �aWeiig1• Sil- ^ e lg IG :gil II a ^ .g= -all:12 1. 2:25 11 A l iii. i ill ° i yC; ; !dIJ Fi��� 8,g. qa � 1g• IPIIIIJli �1 ung 1 .' g$ ^ SII 8';O'4r a� S.g 5 E.8'. g II-13g g z a ;•g 8 3.1 S a E :! g 2.gcrig 61 y _ $ Y. -i LrI. S141! �j'll iEiI . 1 gtfl i v O il till a a 2'• Q . b T ill � � 3•nl� gg C i! n .l.q-ill 11. t , a-R g' vtrtitr: t sto _ • Vi. ba.� 11! .II 1HIDIIIU Li —i ; ; ' ga}� , 1 walif = .O , 1 Z. ujI11ihidt al �C 42 g r �• ��ilt-NH} ,,71,:.; 'it at:M 1 512. a risitt;& riii... hire-h.-10 itorir S[S[....„_ .., 2 � iilr ;IIV UT o ik• g, `g'. :� : Rei. I h---,-.z.,.11 il ; t lig iqjittil 1121 I Iiiiilit.talatililistp g- 4v. [It'll-0.4 =1111ft - r -. A r6. flEJQHjJdlluiiJjtdI1 ., z3,4z p t,o 1 ,.t i . 01 Ile i 0 tis ii" . 1. 4r1,01 rill `a 1HVU C t�oll A 1! 1.€118r 00� Q RI 7j h _ 1-Sv -- b Ir O m GCS +M°- .4 t' L M ; §al 'lS ell i C:,3 •.v'.5 t:.4-1ppCea� >g11 .e b�b,+ ^c'� ^ ^ =,..2. ,. a ^ • b b•• � ^ G H d1b ?^ �v �° 4. f -- bid _ r Ernnil t..: - .ge 1 S b • . isci 3- G. 1 1 �,,� I. ' S o a t s.•� $•=1 A 3 �rg, � i s 1. � A i ? �1 ^ �.g ! Olf 1 El • � fin' ill" _F� C 9ZP-i 80/90'd 99P-1 Ol£BZEEZ19 N3AVNS Z A03NN3H-woad wd8vp0 88-0Z-1m '' 1 Nan.30ss twee PF a� k� � ?ar I gs, ' 1.i (2)a wholesaler licensed in another state:or (3)an out-of-state or outer.gun or retail. out-of-country en •t Y that sells alcoholic beveragesat wholesale Subd.5.Reports.A holder of a permit under this section must i commissioner of revenue,in a form and at a time the commissioner report monthly to the facility:(1) ll alcoholic beverages imported into Minnesota and delivered to a permit and theperntitholder's is� (2)all sales of alcoholic beverages made from the facility. Reports to the commissioner of revenue under this subdivision shall remain confidential un- less a manufacturer authorizes the release of a report. • History:1997 c 129 art I s 2 ±' 340A.404 INTOXICATING LIQUOR;ON-SALE LICENSES. /For rezr ofsubds/ro 3,see 111,119961 I.) Subd.4.Special provisions;s .! . feativals.(a)The p°�•conventions.or cultural facilities;community governing body of a municipality may authorize a holder of retail on--sale intoxicating liquor license issued by the municipality or by an adjacent municipality to dis- pense intoxicating liquor at any convention.banquet,coni conducted the .meeting,or social affair I : polity or instrumentality thezzofslorts.Jn$independent or cultural facility owned by thernanici- I ; thorny and located within the municipality policy making and to dispense ae- rating liquor at an event held a � licensee must be engaged dispeaee irttozi. byperson or organization i may dispense intoxicatingli or onlyto permittedto use the premises,and may d se intoxicatingse ro any persons attending the event.The licensee may not event held on the person attending or participating in an amateur athletic premises. ' * The verning body ofa mcipamay horize ahoa telaon-s . toxicati(b)ng liquorgolicense issued by thunie municipalitylity toautdispense intolderxicatingof liquilm.o$pale in-- ises at a community festival held within the municipality.The authorization shall specify the area in which the intoxicating liquor must be dispensed and consumed,and shall not be is- .; sued unless the licensee demonstrates that it has liability insurance as prescribed by section 11 340A,d09 to cover the event. G . (For text ofsub&S ro 12,sec M.S.199b1 " Subd_13.Holders rmn�ple on--sale lieetees;uniform licensing pods.N . stands anylocal or other law.a local government unit may adjust the licensing 1: period for any holder of multiple on-sale alcoholic .y. quest of the licensee.The local government unit maybeverage licensesffr in the asaian ofoe 1;1. licensing period. charge a fee lot an adds the r History;1997c129err1 s3.4 • 11;I 340A.409 LIABILITY INSURANCE. ,,,I Subdivision I.Insurance requited.No retail license maybe issued,maintained orre- ,u ncwed unless the applicant demonstrates proof of financial responsibilitywith 111 ability imposed by section 3404.801.The issuing authority must submit thecommission- !" regardti- er the applicant's proof of financial responsibfii .Thisiblcal 11 unrt of government from � tY subdivision does not prohibit a local �'I cash or s requiring lugherinsurance or bond covers I,11• securities.The minimum tequinerricnt for proof of financial r soosibil;t may be . given by filing: f resat respoltsibitity be ' (1)acertificate that there is in effect fix.the license 1�,• an insurer requited to be licensed period i insurance.ory an in issued insurer ey ' under 60A.oy,subdivision A.or by an iti5ttriet tee_ ognized as an eligible surplus lines carrier pursuant to section 60A.206 or ii; lea t$50,000 of coverage because of bods? i u fool providing at $100.000 because of bodily injury to two or moo to any one person in any one oc 510,00, x pei�ons in any one occurrence,$10.00() I•a i; • 5Zt+-d 80/90'd 99t+-1 OlE82EEll9 N3AWI9 f AG3NN311-111oad ed00:50 88-OZ-Jell I i1i"d1 c g s z,. , v o r ,r a iii .( i ae i���j�• i a12 - a• ;8g s.G.gE o� Kv itQls ge•QI 4=� 42e go «a".*, M S �. n.1 lAg: W,2gti.,.-a.` t.«�. .. Syggg L.. • � p�"' 88088� 8 wlig l �b 11114211•• 2Sr 6 era Et „' ` Cie Lel l' C § O t►C�e .. oi �. ii �r 77. $ 3 . 8 •, A 8g-ftfrF! 1an 3 1 5 "' _ � r w 8 �Qy� $, £� � S�. St.B. $ � ��f a $.�$ $ � : ■ r s ea I rullJi~ (l�Ci E.E.Q e•Q•... ,C `••. a "g'o •r P g 4 1 `�' _• DI#H w $ r $ . , If Ng CCS.iII$ inii ' rE [f[& •1uV - s � � yu �',s. .i �p "'iii:� AE � •F+ PQR � e �p$ y r11:12'i O LtIp" t ., N 1 r SdZ LLYY 1,v Si; O- - I i b -. 8' i .2 r eA. en, g 2 : Awbi`.••eqeq�� OC `� I'i .� 'hf' `� w W sf si '012 ,' f isSIasff it ! =j = 5 ` lvi!! E p ,:i F yyQ�' fit ØI7 U'! oF ig '.r IhI $ 1.14;11 Sill i r dUd S. asx ' iI• c •e' iiiEU a 1.1 " fifli a a 21- 4-age i erg Lh O .'off •j•qc17?: ' .. _ _ _ ti At is i.1A A 3 $t Q PS.y tE. . 1� .` & o g 1 $oo 1 & ` _ g -. e.Z ,rte,_ _ .e.. o Er g Auiiiji Ifiiifl 'iiU III!! Fi illhiiti'!I1it. Ex,tzz *a Ii 411� B 5. ♦.�© � � � _ • Q. � � � Geo ! Pia j s " i g iy '�•l� S? .•E� g $�C�� gt dHi a ki s 'tee' $ 5g 85 • , g t g x. g g =1:14 7, 8 s.: a Y r ti g i ..5. la i SC`g 4 L �' 8 M d ^ t A y'" i e. 3 1 O e `Q �ti7 0 r i..: _ L g F w 8 � � c � 6 � • -n 8 h tcr atrta• et: 1 I-. .Pf p 1 .a e 1 t: t- -II a .8 i ii L' 1411 5ZP-d 80/20'd 99V-1 OLEBLEEZ19 N3AVa9 7 A03NN3N-word wd0O:90 86-0Z-JEYI m fg gl ill: 14 i ill PE p t I " PI r ":1- ii .Y. 1 qpi ,,, [b„,,,.,1,20,1 dj !i Pr _ lQ} Q ! E e5m2- $ t , Dc gtOtri i _ t r - wgr ib ib3r • -:... lei. — i• 3 $ roioci ., ersa. rcgRXZ iO1 i � M $2-y2algirlial.Hpfl - g $ xi� Cqr e . Ctin 6yili j .N1ISE= ses $_ 4.0`1111. , 2 ie exy1A24 � - HFJIirJdItU IflJiJ iikiffnA c°' Ei .a'otejg-i .sg2EL`3•Cr� SZ o-' + 7. •? tArg= q�C � i4 2F33. •~ - 'l a _' a}J t v IF:-AsitfilFilill §rg 1 • CO �' ks o 5.g.� �2e g 74 a S - <ll 3. LE e g oo E ` g $ �c 5C � yam.g•� � S �1g g � � eq dlit$ d , 1QR1 .9.., �• v ag 0.-_.$ y. [egOO LTimI +� - G't .Si • D. CT '�• ... g tS' E aOCj Ef-, 1fJi � 1- . . tr. o 9,„ 2 E�rpC ;t14-1h.' ti • tifi !InU , . liO - l G O [fl .. n � _ �• o �' .- 'fir' 6 d.s t.gil ,11 4 :4 ii O O _ gg {j P °� fry O 1.5: igatil kat 2 � t i; •j L s t g f 1 g fr g = fg tearq I_ 7G :. _ is . . 1.• to 1 3 ?i 'l f 1 is r›' gi f _ P e � 5s. s el sans9 e e o9 FR pi H Els ! $8, $ Svc" a �`< �Sae` �� 2, ���$ Q � � .q 8. '� • o�'a I.,ggit,tignilm e w , `< C}r • �ao�o y• ES .z Uifl. � �.... r . o im .. n .$ � vv} S'9S•,� 8 a _lig pkp r. i .`"- ti ii t ".. tae It! ;iD`o `r 2-4:`` O O - A tl O V A a a o f t 2;g• •e. S t r $ 5 .9,101 ;...r. .F -. a 111iilliii. n�'3. r 'S e J ego 30 '11 1 , 14 lel rig! -• 3 `J c 3 3 - 8. filt< 311: ; fa ,� g jast W. F., o 2oetraZ ica, .e '1 b- x tv .tr� - i ti .." s $ k 1 W t'Qa 5 Ufl nentop.744:01.22. " ,....z. .1 f ...„Iptit- liv".. iiii' Eli t 9 IlD bl 'El !l'iri g lia.R alg Lip -,..,, -vfg t ftgi r4 Ao O t6 f;d O i• `� 61 o S. S' o ' IJIjh artpe 7 ia Q �. wC .. C 4 '� `ctH e `7' so. . O g SE ii g e $ 118 x --a a a' �.�, 22_f y� is .�C $ g.i lb l �Py V. n 1 !.+ b' ... 2: ti 'C g lir g -m B S4 Eva kUIEhilIb 4. .4 41i i 1 g �. a- Et .2L -2.3-1 ab $12 . g2t - n .. $ n 4 9Z1-d 80/80'd 951-i OtE82EEZI9 N3AVa9 I Aa3NN3N-word wd(0:50 Re-n7-Jew f • MEMORANDUM • TO: Bruce Kessel FROM: Scott Riggs DATE: March 20, 1998 RE: Necessary Changes to Permit Beer Garden Bruce: Per your request, here is a summary memorandum of the issues involved and/or changes necessary to permit a "beer garden" on City park property. Please note that I have also briefly discussed this matter with Chuck Whiting. In order to facilitate the Festival-in-the-Park "beer garden," changes to the following Municipal • Code sections appear to be required, depending upon what type of license the event sponsor desires: Code Section 909.07, Subd. 11 would have to be modified to permit alcoholic beverages in whatever City park is to be utilized for the event. The City's Code Section 503.03, Subd. 3, as to temporary non-intoxicating [this term is no longer permitted by state statute and should be changed to "3.2 percent malt liquor." see Minn. Stat. § 340A.411, Subd. 3] license would have to be possibly modified as to the length of time the entity requesting the license has been in existence (a requirement not found in state statute) and possibly as to the location of the event. [See Minn. Stat. § 340A.403, Subd. 2). Code Section 502.03. Subd. 6. as to a temporary intoxicating liquor special event license would have to be modified possibly as to the location of the event. Please note however, that the length of time the entity requesting this license has been in existence cannot be less than three (3) years for this license based upon the City Code and state statute. [See Minrt. Stat. § 340A.404. Subd. 10]. This section also permits a licensee to contract for intoxicating liquor catering services. Depending upon the location of the event, Code Section 502.15, as to zoning restrictions, • MU1. 257 U125-5-b5 SZP-i 80/ZO'd 99P-1 OIE8LEEZI9 N3AVa9 7 A03NN3N-woJWdt9:g0 86-0Z-JeI1 and Code Section 502.04, Subd. 2.c. and Code Section 503.04. Subd. 2.c. & d., as to • licensing restrictions. may also have to be addressed. As an alternative to the above noted options. Code Section 502.03. Subd. 7 provides for the issuance of a temporary intoxicating liquor banquet license, which can be issued to a holder of an on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by the City or an adjacent city.. subject to the requirements(similar to those contained in the above referenced code sections)of the subdivision. as well as the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 340A.404, Subd. 4(a). Additionally, a new Municipal Code section could also be created to encompass the authority contained in Minn. Stat. § 340A.404. Subd. 4(b) as to a retail on-sale intoxicating liquor licensee's ability to make off premise sales at a community festival. It should be determined if either Code Section 502.03. Subd. 7 or the new Minn. Stat.. § 340A.404, Subd. 4(b) are viable alternatives to the above noted license options. In addition to the necessary code changes, another issue the City should review is whether or not the event sponsor and the City have appropriate levels of liability insurance to cover such an event (does the City's policy cover such an event etc.). Sec Minn. Stat. § 340A.409. For your reference I have enclosed the above noted statutes. Please feel free to contact me with any further questions you may have regarding this matter. III Scott Riggs cc: Chuck Whiting Bob Long • 517140217 III MU175.4S 9ZP-1 80/E0'd 99b-1 OLE82£EZ19 N2049 7 Aa3NN3)I-woJd Wd29:go 88-0Z-SEM ; n ta i g 11 a g. sta r' Wii t al = ps f O .0,,zttz to I la 01 k cu E g .. ig,y r'A t. a zz 1IIJ 2. lEg 1 8O.wE .. g .04 FIFNI.ga � . g m gn t1y ._. m� 0l 1 ; --fg w� aid 14144'1 ' 14 3 i N g. 1E- Lt 4� C _ P cp '�`" �' ro ra_" 11Jo G .4 1g t.cr 1E01 e it Nig FT. F -111 gl- ?P. t; NI ilVer4g 0141:1: O u iiu[ g Ut Di .,!,J Mn. O ;. ' • R' HiitkI $ l 1 1 lijd Wiø!i • FC Ni"tR PI 4 xi E4-1. 6 '..:.,-: 1114 2 al 2 .A ii �� •140 i1n 114 �.f . i It 8 n � ��.'-' gill P : 1141po _ 13 R � w g til `�• 5.'.. ?gam_ - ., i i ilaz 2 _-' 8 $ a 2sw- 2 - e./ $O � � rr e .:., a. 1 . .F 01 la '.1 eili t 21E9 rd h ; UIT PJ If"; 11 pa k. FM $ 1 iiii ill Ili MP! ti ' i n � S li PERrp �•s� V��E�i.GS � '�v 1 CT�� $ �ri Iv I �[t ��••4•..� ���yA O_ i v v —vS�.. 1 : ;TIKE 1g1Itt ,4 =•1c' P $s a M sL. T s4dii _ .<.2 � gE r -eV eE•=•e ' 1- 0- . ,t' gnq: ° Psi ° 3:.y - •2 . 1 a � �; 11211 � � s .: .,,, �_ � _ � ,e � c C err -, g �e � - -ec rt r:.E3op, .ra 1 - 1 .R rigrxkde : eh 02 r art . i 3 4-g= .eals .. n E R C.T g3 x •�3i�,�-�• Fe 5• ,E B . p gr gig' tii S� i�ls�� ��•}SSY �r � i •�2 $ �,4 OF �a`f0 ,� " nEt • i9.Qo.iap g- ?G$ i 0 03 itigi :LiZ 11 IT E: 6411g § :i II 414 •Igo s eg £ s -a. • eS a e '7.41 ,1:11F41 t3ti �s l <.s, " nrg e s S- G5. 1p ; t!• Qrs 0 3; a as y 0, n $S n .dos �i c e MI $ •�, 8 L,..• t 8 s. ` 12s1 ii.i3-_ �giGrpga l�3s _i si i. WIT P I Fal f tr- s8 moo- d ° 019-0 8il VI Qf. ti g $ -R0 -'"-1 g - Aalil 4 1 - it • It' jr-§ 24 R 3 � S - arm,S•��, r �� ��• fi�1 e3 e � fip'g e i S O o[ i: ' t 1 21 I w= t-' I� t�� �O G • Qfl11flt4110 W � lid W 4. 1asl. f 4 t 1 f it Dd 'P g SZq-d 8000'd SP-1 OIE81E£Zl9 N3AVa9 7 A03NN3N-woJd wd89:1/0 88-0Z-Je1 A _ 9 pp tin ill Imi. I q IN gr riapplig 1 ,„ . tot .r sapp3g <-2.21 ris.4,,,- g-aig.2. 11 agr -21101 -..ellar i §1E-281; 4. 3c..x 18g. K -Otis. IK ol. g.hip ; :,;,-K igt'Ll'ili.X , 9 ,r •o s� 9!s o lee .: g . r r Ufa a i q • i ligi l 1111111111 J. Q iiz sb .: c i V y�'C' o •�s Nit Fit 0 4 1r Erwsl !IIIH1J avav =oPila • r e$ QG 0 g e `: 5 G C aigQ G iftF %s h•O A17 � 3 R& g g 4>g 31- .0 _544'54 ' di4 ;Igg. : agig " i 2.? ,'; m 110111 'II •CCN z4, L', 1� Qrw S' dita Al*� 1� c� � O ,n E•� C• Q ho o, g4 W a-g r g Egleo., 211V - z. ay wm 8. R.. - 11 ,. . ., .. g6.1 ,fp.h emot. ,ah -.14.t191 , 1a- 41J, ......„,1 11 wt., 14 El E tr,..-414- 1,4 iE4itilaga REF 1-421 eir.g/1 =4---1. . 2 dopg 1 %9 POIOde s a�= gi '` s E $,moi 11Q s l¢i g f g' f2 , tee g- S e el le LIII! g • s g� + a . pal �$ '�, $ �ct.q'= n s � �. . 8 --c Gra o 1rr „a-25 . ti „ _>4HI E*7". r•C" •�$ itIJ r ;uD fs" s r ii- il i m - ,7 � $ rgill!gnilllMillMIIMMIIIIIM i � it: � f IN I pl PI !pi �'$ a KI,U ' g`'q1 II I 14 . 7.v. ,z71.7.2.1, v19.1 qwprigtill9.,d.L.÷10..,. I qpinit toi i _ Pa". - el r mg. - ---.U- Fge.a. :il. .1 2 :2.101 slt 1 ;. • rel- 11 4 - - 7-.::. i i NV 1 PEETIN Gqi Eiggia 29 Up? 111.10 iT .!•...1:.,%-,.e F, 4 i E-04 •.,.. t . 1 z.._ r i r / e . ?,11 g i IRLY4 1 ,ems, � q hajahlia.114.1 e��• g �'rf � �a7 or �'=i ��p.-. ..z..*:. ri i r 4- =-Tiffiro 4 - xfsi viirviirl". 2143 �• I .�ei�\O I �• O �G• }� y �.dt. Qs e if -. aa eT � 6 i 1p `9‘ $ 1111011' WjD!IiWdtII:lIiItdff g �'` e a rz:.-1,.. fp, cqi '.. i =i 1 lia4 . at - isojol : 1 e` h � o 'a 1 IL— N mum s ' rig ig a �. Q lr �'.¢i e C W. ling w-Pill * : rIjIli1 '-1 1 • bib C I t G§ C�L ? - iS E� g $ — -3 r `Q,� ar ... .T O wP• !III Qil j"i' Mfr O' i i . i54C OC3 S. 1�rr Q 3:4‘.1 .- I. 0 ,I• iga- 14 - . ig: ? 3 k• Ade o "o rm _ .. ggs fli 44 9Z17-d 80/90'd 99P-1 OlEBIEEZ19 N3AVNS 7 Aa3NN3N-woJd wd89:P0 88-0Z-SEN Pock 4.1— SC, 1 (2)a wholesaler licensed in another state:. (3)an out-of-state oreut-of conn entitythat sells alcoholic bei 1': .1 or retail. beverages at wholesale j Subd.5.Reports.A holder of a permit under this section must report i commissioner of revenue,in a form �and at a time c commissioner monthly to the (J)all alcoholic beverages importedintoprescribes: facility:and nnesotaaaddclivercdtorl,epeitholder'a b;:l (2)all sales of alcoholic beverages made from the facility. Reports to the commissioner of revenue under this subdivision shall remain confidential un- less a manufacturer authorizes the release of a report. 1: History:1997 c 129 an I s 2 '• ' 340A.404 INTOXICATING LIQUOR;ON-SALE LICENSES. (For text of subds I to 3,see A1.11996 .'1 . Subd.4.Special provisions:sports,conventions,or cultural facilities:community festivals,(a)The governing body of a municipality may authorize a holder of a intoxicating liquor license issued by the municipality or by an adjacent municipality on--sale `, pense intoxicating liquor at any convention.banquet,conference,meeting.or social to air i:, conducted on the premises of a sports.convention.or cultural facility owned by the mu i it i',• polity or instrumentality thereof havingrude pality instrumentality within thereof the municipality pendent policy making and appropriating au. eating liquor at an event held a p tY licensee must be engaged to dispense intozi- `` by person or o • _i may dispense intoxicatingliquor onlyto organization permitted to use the pretnisss,and dispense intoxicating liqur to any persons attending the event.The licensee may not event held on the premises. person attending or participating in an amateur athletic r: (b)The governing body of a municipality may authorize a holder of a retail on-sale in- toxicating liquor license issued by the municipality to dispense intoxicating liquoroffprem. J: ises at a community festival held within the municipality.The authorization shall specify area in which the intoxicating Iiquor must be dispensed and consumed,and shall not e the- sued unless the licensee demonstrates that it has liability insurance as prescribed section 3404.409 to cover the event by i. ;; (Foe text of.subtly S to 12,sec MS.1996/ ;,; Subd.13.Holders otmnittple on-sale lirm 1 ' standing any local ordinance or other law.a local goverment nitlicensing may adj�the licensing Ii: period for any holder of multiple on-sale alcoholic beverage •7i. quest of the licensee.The local goverment unit may licenses in the ustme upon ii,. licensing period. charge a fes for an adjustment of the $ , History:1997 c 129 air ls3.t • ;'II'� - 34DA.409 LIABILITY INSURANCE. Subdivision 1.Insurance requited.No retail license may be issued.maintained orre- .i'.u ncwed unless the applicant demonstrates proof of financial responsibility with regard 1;1 • E i ability imposed by section 3404.801.The issuing authority must submit to theeo 8 toin i'( er the applicant's proof of financial responsibility i a unit of government from requiring higltcrittsuraor bond subdivision does not prohibit a local •i' cash or. I.. 1 cash r ties.The rninirnum requirement for proof of financial spa deposit of 1. filing: responsibility may �� (J)acertificatethat thereisineffect;.: an insurer required to be ther licensed for the license period an insurance insurer r an eligible1tunder section 60A.07,subdivision A.or bl an n issued rec- ognized as700 of �lus lines carrier pursuant to section 60A.206 oro � 5100.000 coverage because f bodily injury to anyonepool occurrence.ng lbecause of bodily in u to two or more personnyoinany one $ 0.000 ti persons in any one occurrence,510,000 i' 1 I;1: . 0 • i + i• Y 9Z1'-j 80/90'd 994-1 OlE81EEZ19 N3AVa9 I d03NN3>I-mid ad00:90 88-OZ- Ell I . HpE 4 t w $ eIE RS��`pp ...................z 0 $ Cc v�U� _ . -"i Cr '1a a y.�: C r 6�y n z P v a uZ t�r. g � QQ••'!i ?h ! liwitz � Qy 4 �.f I E . 1 A 'y .. X t$ i 5 �� CO i� �O w _y - g �O�, R {fi g i a .`S rf W. 4 .440111Wft r !1 ^ A .11:2 'X •2 tn �a o o a ira i u 2-1-21A I-+r-?Ir i� i =god •r le 4 4 .s.... ,121. .11.111. Fir' rlij 0r/3-4 =eol - IIFIIT ritipiTi t2gia - ',6g G 2+3 V 'r I g n o M Site h. 1 :.1 ... 1 r _ _ r o, g 1 o, i21 eWW^-ee yg No f •Ery gal: EV:- � - - O � - cif n•6 `� w Ws '. �. b �s gyn �, A a. � A1pg� P 4� fa 1 i - ci a gs 5p, Fil :. PU Q4.ti m; . g51 1 <-. i g� p4i § § g� iq v� �` S� °off' t; � C g~stIEi f I [ $ �3 g a ' - 12 R • a �g5ass.- g g _ _ C!IQE. orale 11- toS 4 .77. k- X ..1 a - 1, .4:2.oi, 4 r t ... fs hrl.a. ER 1-8 g g .. a E, I. ,Agi , ... v & st t! i . a§ g 1 s-_,..2-- I .1 4' I. ii n. ;'Ea.a a Aa x a t l IoW e• N e ve5 11. I 1 -11 g .d 1 11,5 Zir- 2:. 1.-919. 13 Pi - vs 13.E4 ':tlite r tjt Pa rill.' . m.2,:-1441`2 g• li ii:SP, Ft§ kz.-- 4-- - pug. 'X f-' s E. a. - g ggErge1 :41- - rg . a,g0 - ar .., :cf., Ci 11 : z04 z i „.e IfUh:I 'ULf I- A C a 11tH 2. Ero '0If s hilifi te or ` 5 VC St litit E. ' � vIIUIIDIIMR et il `'• '1 =' a' 24 g n• w Tx N S 1 -051R2•3114 A ti �Y aEll is! flii-; , i Eg. 11 1 tsls,f§ E a l " 33— 8 • s` g $ t t $ 3 1 ._,$ = S $ss. g • ig. a v - a � g X48. g. F n 8 `� o a S a 2, g •1e Q 2a s 6. E.q " - n .A$ C e Fj•to ee sL 2 o a s rg. ig ' g it . E j ag. -... %c.. . / i ea::,- r 4. 9., a ,.,g; 1g 2: nal* P E _ gb.rZ. � ' Iii 5�pS 8 3 a �5 $ 88 N •, 8 a I 8 t 9ZP-d 80/10'd 99V-1 01E82EEZt9 N3AM0 7 AG3NN3N-woJd wd00:90 88-0Z-JRN U r '� t,a� '� a y� . g his � 'p^'! �2 a . 'O e V EPS!t O ith .D � ��qy+, �r Ay �D Cfspyopt7f it ,Q Z b OaCTeV-9Fw, ".. 1 1 %1 11111. g.2r � �.xr C � i 2t -11.21 ".1 Err � O � ��ii e�► - 6.. � " � o ga ,$ "Q $b �, W 1 a s .. x ebw — ri g e is - e -get:1'1h -° bi•r - - i4pillie Fr .way !` i /. ® 9 E.44: � if `04 . -- --z ■ b2e - <•88gg4c �' P� * •> t�rer G= c •bo' BB- ea ^ Si �•q, 1■R l.aa ' kil tztii4r4 1; o zliis � e °-•fil@C'a' d ■ r wal, jI� pi =ifiVITIEIla; ;gia"ItE o8 t 11:4 • t I. =. ' i [ s S•a s ; g !in $ p` �s tt < _=:� X13 ■ S �'i R R 3j� tl NE • [y]. �QQ�Q}} e��r 1,G ill �' t� ii 111 ilx-g � `•" � 117 � /hi�� D �tG�' � y g. ���t fit! �wnn�Cy ���p � �� 1 wwii ffii e $. } x gyp} g '�ei1 T .�E `s g1 if �oltria s 1 $ gg ��� tl'� o5 f rro .fir "a 'E q o3 Y .'� �' S0G pg t t o A � �y i IS a�i , F fAn En°•DS w e •7 ,'C aF 8 --.. • � nw3 * 2 0 �yQ� �C} _ p N.r QQ or .4 :4 ti g.G1 Ir N o riv. ele R+g E !r••�. i A y O u pa'ag aj Q'O r_- G. ��SS tri C. $ -.n1 s 1 '¢ ' V ` g 9- 2 1 o• fr a = g I9, •2._ c 5 ig a § 8gt$$Ok $ g a �-01 w �� s 8 a 5. ,?.,gcrefrii p..., 14 , —r.....•: . gtg 1 8 �yrEg 47r!''• " r' !'r w 0 - 8 .1,-* IgL leyyti -6......--- -, = 8,,......„.., ....,, g e. -§ c tts.a a a g , j.::: 2 :l � — in S. `ip is�S � r ia: s•g � - 3 gal e . l "-. �a. a ,.:1-1 II olli .141. 2'31ffrnal age in g z e $$Qy� y .. a I r,� ° a9991t_ .1... O F! Lf7aet p 2,•%•: 0011 'f �.Or d al 3 i O n 1. ........„ rig 8r :fa w -� tr�f Q �, � .► EF Q a. �fir a trpsiri-Vol -ig: gui irmt: vit313 ast ■ l �. rr2 ir M OD WC. S• -ig g-s igt: ,tri wgA Ile. ■ Le G • n v r^ .o� egItg-, �-,1 t3 ay (� oe :s n tq al m 3 p r �r - e I " - $' -1"' ai - t * g viE ;NE i C O�_ y{ S.0 Q C M W S �+ d•r' b n �� _ rg - 2,1rs ,:.-,/ § gril - q . I„ GstIga.l. a 4 i i.. i iv § J5 ..7.3:. 0 411. g N g 1 li - A2-R -siit-NaTIg 0 e �y 8 - l $$ �'a• g �' gya -m a`v g ,, eGCB c > b $�+ a10gLj' e3 .tta� 'gg .■.p' :. C n� $ g `� ;� ^ � g2t a ¢�7 rT L 9ZP-d B0/80'd 99P-1 OIE81EEZ19 N3AV219 7 A03NN3N-Wold WdQp;90 994z-Jew TO: Mounds View City Council . FROM: Mary Malrick 784-3890 Barbara Haake 784-8260 DATE: March 20, 1998 RE: Spring Lake Road/County Road I(SLR/CRI)Reconstruction In the past, staff has informed the citizens and city council that the were unable to locate docu- mentation which mandated road standards in the City of Mounds View. We all were told that 32'street widths with curb and gutter were mandated by "Road Improvement Policy" and assessments would be based on a 30'wide street with the additional 2'picked up by the city. It was not until the week of March 16th that a document was found. (Please see attachment titled "Resolution No. 4825".) Resolution No. 4825 was adopted and signed on September 26, 1995. This document made provision for: -recommended street width of 30'measured from curb face to curb face; -also, street widths of 26', 28', 30', 32'and 38'; - allowances for less than 30' in width: a. should circumstances exist that would greatly increase the construction cost; b. or circumstances determined to be a detriment to the neighborhood ie. loss of IIIan extremely high amount of mature trees, etc.; c. will need approval of a majority of the property owners on the affected street. Also attached are the city council minutes and discussion leading up to the adoption of Resolution No. 4825 dated September 26, 1995 and more minutes from October 9, 1995. The minutes reflect the same repetitious arguments that have been stated throughout the 1995 street reconstruction discussions, the present SLR/CRI upgrading and will be repeated again on future road reconstruction projects. Sue Hankner and Julie Trude discussed at length and repeatedly stated that..."they(the citizens) need to have a consensus of a majority of the neighborhood"..."would like the neighborhoods to have a more active say than a passive say as to what they want"..."(Resolution) does not address impacts to the landscape plans or the feeling of the neighborhood in the sense of community". We agree with Sue Hankner's statement that an informational meeting be held before the "feasibility study is commenced to get citizen input and another meeting after(its drafting) to go over the study and what is being proposed to provide residents with an active participation tool to influence the council in their final decision". Other familiar statements came from Julie Trude who said..."some people view their homes as an extension of the street and others view their home as part of a green space and the streets are strictly a way to get to and from places...that(the citizens) wanted to stay with the road widths 0 that the city has now...that they are concerned about traffic speeds and costs". IDEAS AND PRACTICES COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES March 11, 1998 2:00 p.m. Present: Chair Hammerschmidt, Jarson, Dorgan, and Saarion. Three suggestions were read and discussed. 1. Suggestion was to look into the possibility of having bottled water available since the tap water. Committee thought this a good idea to pursue and John H will check into the costs and submit information to Tracy S. for consideration. 2. Suggestion was to look into the growth around the toilet and sink pipes of the men's downstairs bathroom. It was suggested that Tim Pittman have this looked into. 3. Concern was expressed about the condition of the downstairs kitchen. Saarion said that she would remove and throw away the icky rags. It was suggested that Dick the custodian be requested to check and clean the kitchen and add this into his task list. This to be discussed with Tracy S. It is presumed that staff mostly uses the staff lounge microwave and refrig or upstairs microwave and sink. However,the stove/oven in the community kitchen probably is used by staff. Otherwise, there should be no one using the kitchen except community groups which have the responsibility of cleaning up after themselves - and have clean-up money deposited to ensure that this occurs. 4. Suggestion that group listen and provide recommendation for the incoming City Hall line 717-4000. Committee listened to menu and agree that it was OK- suggestion to check into the option of getting to extension quicker by pressing letters of person's first three letters of last name. Hammerschmidt or Tracy S. will check on this possibility. Meeting adjourned. INFORMATION ONLY 126 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1998 7:00 PM 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL: McCarty, Stigney, Koopmeiners, Quick, Gunn 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Special Meeting called to order March 2, 1998 B. Regular meeting of March 9, 1998 4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: 5. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Just and Correct Claims B. Acceptance of Commission Minutes • 1. Planning Commission Minutes-February 4 & February 18, 1998 C. Licenses for Approval: See staff report D. Request Authorization to replace the Cable TV Tape Recorder Play/Record to be funded with Cable TV Franchise fee funds. E. Request Authorization to enter into contract agreements for 1998 tree removal services. F. Request Authorization to transfer 1997 Mounds View Community Theater revenues to Western Bank in the MCT checking account. G. Set a Public Hearing for 7:05 PM on Monday,April 13, 1998 to consider Resolution No. 5216, a Resolution approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for TOLD Development Company, 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road. H. Set a Public Hearing for 7:10 PM on Monday,April 13, 1998, to Approve the First Reading of Ordinance No. 614, an Ordinance Approving of Specific Rezoning of Properties Located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road from Low and Medium Density Residential to Limited Business for TOLD Development Company. I. Approve Extension of Time Frame to File Development Stage Plan for Anthony Properties Project. J. Approve Extension of Time Frame to File Final Plat for the Everest Building N Project. el 6. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR A. Citizens: Before speaking must give their full name and address for the minutes. • March 20, 1998 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator Re: March 23, 1998 City Council Meeting We have a good agenda for Monday night. Council will notice from the Consent Agenda that we are preparing for some much anticipated items in April. Here's what we have: Consent Agenda-Items 5G and 5H-Re: TOLD Walgreens Development: This project is now going through the Planning Commission process. These two items are to set the public hearings for April on the comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning questions. Item 5I-Development Stage Plan Extension for Anthony Properties on Theater Project: Rick Jopke's memo notes that the time frame for consideration of the concept plan for the theater project expired in February. Anthony Properties' project is now coming to the Planning Commission on April 1, but it has been found that the concept plan expired within the nine month period set in code. Staffs recommendation is to simply extend the period as noted in Jopke's memo and deal with the anticipated concerns such as no exits onto H2 or Long Lake Road as part of the final process rather • than here. Staff has been having discussions with Anthony Properties on the traffic light cost and feel Anthony Properties has cooperated with all the concerns expressed by the City and nearby residents, and feels granting the extension with the understanding of dealing with the specifics during the final plan review process is more appropriate. • Item 5J- Everest Request for Extension on Final Plat Filing for Building N Site: There is no harm to the City to grant this extension for 120 days. Everest has contacted me again regarding whether any options may exist on getting City approval for the Building N project. I met with them last week not to offer anything,but discuss possible city interest in some Everest controlled property over by the Mermaid. Nothing else has happened on N since. Items 7A and B-Ordinance Amendments regarding Noise Control and Animal Control: Chief Ramacher will be present to review these with the Council. Council will recall discussing the issues at the last work session. These are the first readings of the ordinance amendments. Item 7C-Resolution 5123 Regarding Spring Lake Road/County Road I Reconstruction: Mike has put this together following the lead the Council took at the last meeting. He notes that since then the MPCA has gotten involved and there may be considerations for drainage ponding to be aware of. Barbara Haake called me to suggest the city consider applying for Rice Creek Watershed funds for land acquisition in drainage situations, and it may be prudent to go ahead and do that whether we are ready or not. This item should take some discussion and clarification of where or if we are in a process or not. Also, it should be noted that Mike found a resolution from 1995 regarding city preferred street standards. Page 1 APPROVED • February 23, 1998 Mounds View City Council PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA Regular Meeting February 23, 1998 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View,MN 55112 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: . The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:00 p.m. on February 23, 1998. 2. ROLL CALL: • MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor McCarty,Council members Koopmeiners, Quick,Gunn and Stigney ALSO PRESENT: Chuck Whiting,Clerk Administrator Rick Jopke,Community Development Director Bob Long,City Attorney 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: A. Regular Meetings of February 9, 1998. Council member Stigney noted two changes to the minutes. Page 3,Line 9 should include the number of man hours to clean the city's sanitary sewer system. Additionally,Line 14 should be changed to read"not eligible to retire until 2000." MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Koopmeiners to approve the Minutes of the February 23, 1998 City Council Meeting AS AMENDED. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried • 4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: None. APPROVED • Page 3 February 23, 1998 Mounds View City Council With no further comments or questions from the Council,Mayor McCarty took this opportunity to thank Ms. Gaertner,Mr.Rhodes and Mr.Zdrazil for their attendance and for the valuable information they provided. 8. REPORTS: Council member Stigney stated he has received several calls from residents in regard to the Nuisance letter that they received. Mr. Whiting noted that this is in reference to possible violations of car parking. Staff is trying to respond to complaints that have come in and is going out to identify violations. Letters were sent out to possible violators and were not meant to imply that they are definitely in violation. He noted that this will be put on the agenda for the next Council Work Session for further discussion. Mayor McCarty noted a correction to a report which appeared in the Focus Newspaper. He proceeded to read verbatim what was said at the last Council meeting to Ms.Haake and the citizens group in regard to the way they conducted their input in the Spring Lake Road/County Road I Improvement Project and his appreciation. He proceeded to read the report as it appeared in the Focus,noting that it the report was neither accurate nor appropriate. Attorney Long gave an update on the Anoka County Airport issue. He noted that staff had directed him to • pursue legislation regarding the Anoka County Airport runway extension issue. There was a House hearing,but it lost with a vote of 11 to 7. He noted that this legislation prompted discussion and may have set some groundwork for future policy sessions. He explained that it appears that there could be many other communities experiencing the same problems with MAC. He noted that the Council should begin thinking about what steps they may want to take next. 9. NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION:March 2, 1998-6:00 p.m. NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: March 9, 1998- 7:00 p.m. 10. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor McCarty adjourned the City Council meeting at 7:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, t jet/Wit(a, ,./),,i/et Tamara D. Saefke Recording Secretary • L74. • uNAppRovED PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA Regular Meeting March 2, 1998 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View,MN 55112 ********************************************************************************** 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 10:00 p.m. on March 2, 1998. 2. ROLL CALL: • MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor McCarty,Council members Koopmeiners, Quick, Gunn and Stigney ALSO PRESENT: Chuck Whiting,Clerk Administrator Bob Long, City Attorney Bruce Kessel,Finance Director 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consider calling the Council into session to set a date for a public hearing on the transfer of liquor license of Donatelles for 7:10 p.m.on Monday,March 9, 1998. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Approve the Consent Agenda as presented. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 2. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor McCarty adjourned the City Council meeting at 10:05 p.m. • Respectfully submitted, /�,, Tamara Saefke,Recording Secretary/�zu___ • L.5,3 UNAPPROVED Page 1 i March 9, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 9 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 10 RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA 11 12 Regular Meeting 13 March 9, 1998 14 Mounds View City Hall 15 2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View,MN 55112 16 ********************************************************************************** 17 18 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: 19 • 20 The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:00 p.m.on March 9, 1998. 21 22 2. ROLL CALL: 23 24 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor McCarty,Council members Koopmeiners, • 25 Quick,Gunn and Stigney 26 27 ALSO PRESENT: Chuck Whiting,Clerk Administrator 28 Rick Jopke,Community Development Director 29 Bruce Kessel,Finance Director 30 Jim Ericson,Planning Associate 31 Michael Ulrich,Director of Public Works 32 Mary Saarion,Director of Parks&Recreation 33 Scott Riggs,City Attorney 34 35 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 36 37 A. Regular Meetings of February 23, 1998. 38 39 MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Koopmeiners to approve the Minutes of the February 23, 1998 City Council 40 Meeting as presented. 41 42 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 43 44 4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: • 45 UNApPROVED . Page 3 March 9, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 dedicate a portion of land for public purposes or a cash dedication in lieu of land. The dedication amount 2 would be$68,400 for this development. Mr.Ericson noted that the final plat has been reviewed by 3 Ramsey County and approved except for one technicality which is expected to be resolved. Additionally, 4 the City Engineer,Director of Public Works and the Rice Creek Watershed District have reviewed it and 5 found it acceptable. 6 7 Mr. Ericson noted a minor change to Resolution No. 5212. The 9th and 10th WHEREAS clauses should 8 be removed from the resolution. Stipulation 5. should be added to read 5. Approval of this plat shall be 9 subject to a satisfactory title opinion by the Mounds View City Attorney. 10 11 MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to approve Resolution No.5212,Approving the Silverview 12 Estates Final Plat, WITH THE DELETION OF THE WHEREAS CLAUSES#9 AND#10. 13 14 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 15 16 B. Public Hearing to Consider Licenses for 2400 Highway 120,doing business at Donatelles: 17 18 1. Public Hearing on transfer of on-sale liquor license. 19 2. Consider transfer of liquor license from Donatelle's Inc.(Edward Donatelle)to 2400 Highway 11) 20 10,Inc.(Jeffrey Weyek)-expires 6/30/98. 21 3. Consider issuance of an amusement center license and associated amusement devices licenses- 22 expires 12/31/98. 23 4. Consider issuance of a restaurant license-expires 12/31/98. 24 25 Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7:29 p.m. 26 27 Mr. Kessel,Finance Director,explained that there have been a number of comments made by residents 28 with regard to this transfer. Concerns addressed include the location of the garbage containers,the 29 incinerator on the property and the parking situation. 30 31 Mr. Jopke noted that he is unable to find anything in the ordinance that would require that these concerns 32 be addressed before the transfer can be made. However,the concerns will be addressed under the city 33 code. 34 35 Pat Michna,5287 Edgewood Drive, stated there have been many complaints of accidents in the area due to 36 lack of driveway or entrances/exits from the street. She is also concerned about the garbage containers 37 which she feels are inadequate for the type of business. Other concerns she addressed were the junk and 38 debris at the rear of the property(she is not sure if this is part of the Donatelle property), whether or not 39 there are sufficient parking spaces for the business,and the incinerator on the property. 40 41 Attorney Reeds explained that these issues deal with code enforcement and that the transfer of the liquor 42 license cannot be denied because of the concerns addressed. 43 44 Mr.Jopke noted that the entrance/exits will be taken into consideration at time of street reconstruction . 45 which is expected to take place within the next two to three years. In regard to adequate parking,Mr. 46 Jopke stated he was unable to respond but would check on it to be sure it is in code compliance. 47 UNAPPROVED Page 5 i March 9, 1998 Mounds View City Council '1 View because of the large lots,the mature trees. He finds that the lack of curb and gutter,and the unpaved 2 driveways give the area a"country flavor". Curbs and a 32-foot wide road will change the whole look. 3 4 Cindy Rundle,7445 Spring Lake Road,stated she is against a 24-foot wide roadway. She feels there 5 should at least be a biking lane to provide a safe place for children to bike. She further stated that it may 6 not be necessary to put in a 30 foot wide road,but she would like the Council to consider the biking lane. 7 8 C.R.Barragan,7765 Spring Lake Road,stated he also sees potential hazards with their narrow roadway. 9 He sees a lot of joggers around the lake and feels that a path should be provided on the East side of the 10 road for safety. He would be in favor of a walking path. He stated he feels a 28 foot wide road is perhaps 11 too wide,but something must be done to improve the situation. 12 13 Rob Marty,2626 Louisa Avenue,noted that at the February 2nd Council Work Session,there was a 14 discussion in regard to water run-off, drainage and storm sewers. He feels that increasing the width of the 15 road will only add to the problem of water run-off. 16 17 With no further comments,Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 8:20 p.m. 18 19 Mr.Ulrich went through the revised figures on the various street width scenarios. He noted that the 20 estimates did include storm sewer work that would be required on the project with a curb and gutter, as 21 well as the trailway. He stated he had prepared an assessment calculation based on a 32 foot wide design 22 and a 26 foot wide design with a 50%assessment and then applying the$590,000 in Ramsey County 23 Turnback funds. 24 .25 Mayor McCarty asked why there was such a difference between the original assessment cost of 26 $41.00/frontage foot and the revised figure of$15.44/frontage foot for virtually the same project. 27 28 Mr.Campbell noted that the reduction in the assessment is due to the application of the Ramsey County 29 Turnback Funds of$590,000 to this project. 30 31 A discussion followed in regard to the proposed trailway. Mr.Ulrich noted that the trail on Spring Lake 32 Road is proposed to be concrete,whereas the other trailway connecting to the Fridley section will be a 33 bituminous trail. 34 35 The various street width scenarios were discussed. Mayor McCarty stated he has received a variety of 36 input from residents and feels it is perhaps necessary to find an acceptable compromise so that a project can 37 be started in the 1998 construction season. 38 • 39 Council member Quick wondered if perhaps a 32 foot wide road should be considered without the 40 walkway on Spring Lake Road. County Road I,on the other hand,does need a walking path. A 32 foot 41 wide road would allow residents the additional parking as well. 42 43 Brian Kaden, 7675 Spring Lake Road,noted that in the original survey,over 85%of the residents indicated 44 that they did not want a separate sidewalk. A walkway would take approximately 13 additional feet of • 46 45 his front yard as well as necessitate the removal of many large oak trees. UNAPPROVED Page 7 • March 9, 1998 Mounds View City Council 1 Vince Meyer, 8380 Spring Lake Road,stated this project was started 8 months ago and he would like to 2 see it be done this year. However,he would be in favor of a 24 foot wide roadway without curb and 3 gutter. 4 5 Scott Eiser(?),7340 Spring Lake Road,stated there have been three proposals considered by residents 6 already. The residents only want a 24 foot wide roadway,they do not need a sidewalk. 7 8 D. Consideration of Signalization of Xylite and County Road J. 9 10 Mr.Ulrich explained that staff had spoken with Phil Sype of Sysco in regard to the Council's desire to split 11 the expense of the proposed traffic signal with them. Mr. Sype indicated that they would be willing to 12 contribute$5,000 to the construction of the signal. He had also requested that the city pursue the addition 13 of the right turn lane,which staff also felt was wise. John Grey of SEH will be speaking with Anoka 14 County in regard to this. 15 16 Mr. Ulrich went through the estimated cost of this proposed traffic signal,noting that the cost for the City 17 of Mounds View would be roughly$35,000. 18 19 MOTION by Stigney to decline the proposed traffic signal on the basis that Sysco's contribution of$5,000 • 20 it is too small. MOTION FAILS for lack of a second. 21 22 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve the city's participation in the signal project as 23 presented(with a$5,000 contribution from Sysco) with the inclusion of a right-turn lane to be funded with 24 MSA funds. .25 26 Mayor McCarty explained that this is for a proposed signal at Lilac Street and County Road(new)J which 27 aligns with the driveway into Sysco. This project cost will be shared by Mounds View,Anoka County, 28 Blaine and Sysco. 29 30 VOTE: 4 ayes 1 nay(Stigney Motion Carries 31 32 E. Consideration of Resolution No.5211,Approving and Awarding of Bids for Phase II 33 Construction of the Community Center. 34 35 1. Review of TIF Funding Budgets: Mr.Kessel provided a brief summary of the TIF districts and 36 their cash flow as well as the impact that the expenditures for the Community Center will have on them. 37 38 2. Resolution No.5211 Action: Mr.Dean Olson of WAI explained that they received bids on Phase 39 II of the Community Center Construction on February 24th and that the bids came in on budget as 40 discussed at the last Council meeting. He noted that the construction cost did not include the alternates 41 that the city had asked to be prepared for the bid package. The alternates were discussed with the Task 42 Force and they also felt that the alternates should be included in the project costs. Mr. Olson noted that the 43 bids have been published and are available for review. The total project cost from acquisition to 44 completion is roughly$6.1 million. • 45 46 MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Stigney to approve Resolution No. 5211,Approving and Awarding of Bids for 47 Phase II Construction of the Community Center. L5A- CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS,the City Council of Mounds View,pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed the claim numbers: 58659 through 58775 in the amount of $ 292,964.60 57583 through 57595 in the amount of $ 98,601.02 through in the amount of$ 111, through in the amount of$ TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 391,565.62 and has found said claims to be just and correct; It was moved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached list of claims dated 03/24/98 by the vote ayes nayes Mayor )11 Clerk-Administrator PAGE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER AP-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE D: NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 24102 MINN DEPT OF NATURAL * * 58659 03/24/98 03/01/98 20.00 VENDOR TOTAL 20.00 51250 BEST WESTERN * 58660 03y24/98 03/05/98 147. 18 VENDOR TOTAL 147. 18 77207 HIX , DAVID E. * 58661 03/24/98 62 03y10/98 70.00 VENDOR TOTAL 70.00 80303 KAKAL, ANISA * 58662 03/24/98 03/16/98 50.00 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 80304 BAUER, MARJORIE * 58663 03/24y98 03/16/98 16.00 VENDOR TOTAL 16.00 80305 MSP CONSTRUCTION * 58664 03/24/98 03/16/98 5.00 VENDOR TOTAL ' 5.00 A0285 AT&T * 58665 03/24/98 02/18/98 11 .45 VENDOR TOTAL 11 .45 A029�9 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICE* * 58666 03/24y98 2156128 02/28/98 52.21 VENDOR TOTAL 52.21 A0900 ADAMS * 58667 03/24/98 10011029 02/03/98 876.00 VENDOR TOTAL 876.00 A24�� AIRTOUCH CELLULAR * 58668 03/24/98 02y20/98 38. 19 * 58668 03/24y98 02/20/98 398.63 * 58668 03/24y98 02y20/98 115.95 * 58668 03/24y98 02/20/98 75.22 VENDOR TOTAL 627.99 A5123 AMERICAN OFFICE PRODU* * 58669 03/24/98 318313 02/27/98 6.92 * 58669 03/24/98 318440 02/27/98 278.83 * 58669 03/24/98 318433 02/27/98 112. 72 * 58669 03y24y98 318746 02/27/98 156.62 VENDOR TOTAL 555.09 A6966 ARCADE ELECTRIC CO. * 58670 03/24/98 1042 01y30/98 5858.35 * 58670 03/24/98 1057 01/30/98 7496.74 VENDOR TOTAL 13355.09 B0062 BROWNING FERRIS INDUS* * 58671 03/24/98 0028217 02/28/98 33.00 VENDOR TOTAL 33.00 80212 B S N SPORTS * 58672 03/24y98 0/57276 03/02/98 67.20 * 58672 03/24/98 B758469 03/02/98 729.79 * 58672 03724/98 8767705 03/12/98 59. 14 VENDOR TOTAL 856. 13 o PAGE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER AP-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE D" NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT B211BEI8SWENGER'S * 5867308/24/98 532545 03/11 /98 21 .37 �� * 58673 03y24/98 000000 03y12/98 22.34 * 58673 03/24/98 530112 03y05/98 9. 13 * 58673 03/24y98 529245 03/03/98 5.09 * 58673 03y24/98 529370 03y03/98 7.42 * 58673 03/24/98 528760 03/02/98 3.82 VENDOR TOTAL 69. 17 B2050 BEST BUY CO. , INC. * 88674 03/24/98 0110110043 03y06/98 66.01 VENDOR TOTAL 66.01 B2070 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS 58675 03/24y98 061343 03y09y98 146.44 VENDOR TOTAL 146.44 B3005 BLAINE, CITY OF * 58676 03/24/98 03/01/98 21 .99 * 58676 03/24/98 03/01 /98 20.76 VENDOR TOTAL 42.75 B3200 BOB'S PERSONAL COFFEE* * 58677 03/24/98 11780 03/12/98 30.99 VENDOR TOTAL 30.99 86820 BRENNAN, TIM * 58678 03/24/98 03/19/98 47.34 VENDOR TOTAL 47 .34 B7180 BUMPER TO BUMPER * 58679 03/24/98 D299110 02/20/98 81 .86 * 58679 03/24/98 D302558 03/04/98 5.94 ��� * 58679 03/24/98 D304614 03/11/98 55.97 VENDOR TOTAL 143.77 80150 G T E DIRECTORIES * 58680 03/24y98 6127859063 01/22/98 363.96 VENDOR TOTAL 363.96 C0635 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQU* * 58681 03y24/98 1002210 03/03/98 9.57 * 58681 03/24/98 1002202 03/03/98 10.24 � 1 * 58681 03/24y98 1002284 03709/98 5.42 VENDOR TOTAL 25.23 82200 CERTIFIED LABORATORIE* * 58682 03/24/98 190250 03/02/98 419.31 VENDOR TOTAL 419.31 83491 CITIZENS LEAGUE 58683 03/24/98 03/01 /98 51 .50 VENDOR TOTAL 51 .50 C6000 COPY SALES , INC . 58684 03/24/98 059823 03/10/98 913.93 VENDOR TOTAL 913.93 C6025 COTTENS INC 58685 03/24/98 252054 01/16/98 14.56 58685 03/24/98 257105 02/18/98 52.23 58685 03/24/98 248634 03y01 /98 58.26 =II PAGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER AP-C10-01 ` MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE D: NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 125.05 C711, CUES, INC. 58686 03/24/98 114995 02/23/98 90.41 VENDOR TOTAL 90.41 C7500 CURTIS 1000 INC. 58687 03/24/98 17594901 03/03/98 2554. 12 VENDOR TOTAL 2554� 12 C9700 CY'S UNIFORMS 58688 03/24/98 0028231 02/20/98 61 .45 58688 03/24/98 28324 02/05/98 283.66 VENDOR TOTAL 345. 11 D0050 DCA, INC. 58689 03/24/98 101866 02/27798 158. 10 VENDOR TOTAL 158. 10 D0065 D.J. 'S MUNICIPAL SUPP* 58690 03/24/98 6582 03y01/98 31 .84 VENDOR TOTAL 31 .84 . . D0465 DAHLKE TRAILER SALES,* 58691 03/24/98 00032243 02/25/98 127.80 58691 03/24/98 00032100 01y28/98 127.80 VENDOR TOTAL 255.60 D0696 DAVID - GEOFFREY & AS* 58692 03/24/98 0769985 02/17y98 556.29 58692 03y24/980769677 02/16/98 338.83 58692 03/24/98 0769678 02/16/98 748.52 VENDOR TOTAL 1643.64 D04����� DAVIES WATER EQUIPMEN* 58693 03/24/98 92919 03y02/98 185.30 VENDOR TOTAL 185.30 D1940 DELEGARD TOOL CO 58694 03/24/98 143260 02y23/98 1120.00 VENDOR TOTAL 1120.00 E0315 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 58695 03/24/98 270175 02y24/98 421 .00 VENDOR TOTAL 421 .00 E4437 ELAN FINANCIAL SERVIC* 58696 03y24/98 03y03/98 15.00 VENDOR TOTAL 15.00 E9061 ETONIC WORLDWIDE CORP* 58697 03/24/98 50820052 02/26/98 971 .47 VENDOR TOTAL 9/1 .47 F6895 FRIENDLY CHEVROLET GE* 58698 03/24/98 132471 02/20/98 26.39 58698 03/24y98 133613 03/05/98 114.32 58698 03/24/98 134073 03/11/98 15.72 58698 03/24/98 134070 03/10/98 16.40 58698 03/24/98 132747 02/24/98 126.65 58698 03/24y98 132935 02/25/98 14. 76, 58698 03/24/98 132514 02/20/98 60.30 58698 03/24/98 132576 02y23/98 7 .48 ������ PAGE 4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER AP-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE D NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT VENDOR | OTAL 382.02 F91!IP FURST GROUP, INC 58700 03/24y98 02/22/98 11 .44 VENDOR TOTAL 11 .44 60041 G E CAPITAL 58701 03/24y98' 264638 03/06/98 736.99 VENDOR TOTAL 736.99 60150 G T E DIRECTORIES COR* 58702 03/24/98 02/04/98 32.50 VENDOR ! DIAL 32.50 G5835 GOODHUE COUNTY NATION* 58703 03/24/98 57090 03y01/98 224.84 VENDOR TOTAL 224.84 66755 W W GRAINGER INC 58704 03/24y98 497-161853-5 02/26/98 2.90 VENDOR TOTAL 2.90 H0159 HAAS JORDAN CO 58705 03/24/98 011677 02/26/98 90. 15 VENDOR TOTAL 90. 15 H0580 HANSON, WILLIAM 58706 03/24/98 03/06/98 51 .03 VENDOR TOTAL 51 .03 H4995 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GR* 58707 03/24/98 03/11y98 3893.71 VENDOR TOTAL 3893.71 H HORNUNG'S PRO GOLF SA* 58708 03y24y98 972107 02/24/98 416.78 ��� VENDOR TOTAL 416.78 H6000 HUGHES & COSTELLO 58709 03/24/98 03y03/98 3500.00 VENDOR TOTAL 3500.00 15181 IMPERIAL HEADWEAR, IN* 58710 03y24/98 382203 02/23/98 1258.57 VENDOR TOTAL 1258.57 J49/5 JOHN'S AUTO PARTS 58711 03/24y98 02671927 02/20/98 70.00 VENDOR TOTAL 70.00 K1000 KENNEDY & GRAVEN 58712 03/24/98 22600 03/12/98 5082.50 1 58712 03/24y98 22598 03/12/98 13301 . 16 58712 03/24/98 22590 03/11/98 805.54 58712 03/24/98 16903 03/11y98 100.00 22 58712 03/24/98 22591 03y11y98 349.22 58712 03/24/98 21125 03y11/98 25.00 58712 03/24/98 22597 03/11/98 100.00 58712 03/24/98 22594 03/11/98 250.00 58712 03y24/98 03/11/98 1370.24 58712 03/24/98 21157 03/11/98 600.00 58712 03/24/98 22602 03/11/98 583.44 58712 03/24/98 22603 03/11/98 11 .50 III PAGE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER AP-C10-01 • MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE D: NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 58712 03/24/98 22604 03/11/98 666. 10 ��� 58712 03/24/98 22605 03/11/98 184.80 ���� �~ 58712 03y24/98 22606 03/11/98 506.50 58712 03/24/98 22595 03/11/98 1394.78 58712 03/24/98 22596 03/11/98 241 .50 58712 03y24/98 22597 03/11/98 651 .34 VENDOR TOTAL 26223.62 K5860 KRASS MONROE, P.A. 58715 03/24/98 980600001005 03/16/98 2217.20 VENDOR TOTAL 2217 .20 L0255 L M C I T 58716 03/74/98 03/05/98 15768.00 VENDOR TOTAL 15768.00 M0855 MAXFLI GOLF DIVISION 58720 03/24y98 1741860 03/04/98 353.87 VENDOR TOTAL 353.87 M1001 MCI TELECOMMUNICATION* 58721 03/24y98 63404127 02/25y98 123.97 . VENDOR TOTAL 123.97 M2050 MICHAELS #9522 58722 03/24y98 0734 02/15/98 111 . 16 58722 03/24/98 731 02/18/98 65.46 VENDOR TOTAL 176.62 M2170 METRO. COUNCIL ENVIRO* 58723 03/24/98 51320498 03/10/98 62025.66 VENDOR TOTAL 62025.66 M3411 MICROTECH NORTH 58724 03y24/98 5912 02y20/98 135.98 VENDOR TOTAL 135.98 M3444 MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOT* 58725 03/24/98 00248117 03/01/98 14.91 VENDOR TOTAL 14.91 M3490 MINOR FORD 58776 03/24y98 223423 02727/98 165.36 VENDOR TOTAL 165.36 M3535 MN DEPARTMENT OF TRAN* 58727 03/24/98 03y01/98 126.08 VENDOR TOTAL 126.08 9 21037492 03y01/98 102 99 M5470 MITA FINANCIAL SERVIC* 58728 03/24/98 . VENDOR TOTAL 102.99 M5875 MORTON SALT 58729 03/24/98 757915 03/06/98 3203. 14 VENDOR TOTAL 3203. 14 M6020 MOUNDS VIEW FESTIVAL,* 58730 03/24/98 03/11y98 4000.00 VENDOR TOTAL 4000.00 M6800 STATE CHEMICAL MFG CO 58731 03/24/98 02240665 02/25/98 794.31 VENDOR TOTAL 794.31 ���� �� PAGE 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE fK REGISTER AP-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE D� NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT M8���0MUNICILITE 58/32 03/24y98 9791 03y09/98 317.58 ��� VENDOR TOTAL 317 .58 N0050 N E P CORPORATION 58733 03/24y98 026219 03y02y98 261 .76 VENDOR TOTA( 261 .76 N0900 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CI* 58734 03y24/98 03/01/98 13.00 VENDOR TOTAL 13.00 N1126 NATIONAL INDEPENDENT * 58735 03/24y98 02/28/98 54.00 VENDOR TOTAL 54.00 N2180 NEW BRIGHTON/MOUNDS V* 5O736 03y24/98 1314 03/10/98 250.00 VENDOR TOTAL 250.00 N3395 NORMAN, GREG 58737 03/24/98 00316936 03/02/98 89.99 58737 03/24/98 00310446 02/13/98 607.98 VENDOR TOTAL 697.97 N3535 NORTH METRO MAYORS AS* 58738 03/24/98 950261 02/28/98 54.68 VENDOR TOTAL 54.68 N3694 NORTH SUBURBAN CABLE * 58739 03/24/98 03/09y98 15865.48 VENDOR TOTAL 15865.48 N3 NORTHERN ASPHALT CONS* 58740 03y24/98 19320 03/06/98 74.02 ��� ' VENDOR TOTAL 74 .02 N4200 NORTHERN STATES POWER* 58741 03/24/98 388457912058 02/27/98 840.98 58741 03/24/98 085659018061 03/02y98 139.25 58741 03/24/98 943546782061 03/02/98 6.44 58741 03/24/98 842854514061 03/02/98 6.44 58741 03/24/98 794040397061 03/02798 7.93 58741 03/24/98 783550220058 02/27/98 865.98 58741 03/24/98 493655813061 03/02/98 14.98 58741 03/24/98 840356809061 03y02y98 12.82 58741 03/24/98 309155315058 02/27/98 126.20 58741 03/24/98 691642583061 03y02/98 77.49 58741 03/24/98 521503007060 03/01/98 4019.63 58741 03/24/98 680027169068 03/09/98 13.97 58741 03/24/98 324612811063 03/04y98 43.41 58741 03/24y98 105066499061 03/02/98 26.96 58741 03y24/98 335649486063 03/04/98 77.02 58741 03/24/98 970652120061 03/02/98 25.56 58741 03/24/98 745346795063 03/04/98 218.53 58741 03/24/98 281349293063 031'04/98 6.44 58741 03/24/98 658543992061 03/02/98 41 .60 58741 03/24/98 778059313061 03/02/98 42.47 58741 03/24/98 903941195063 03/04y98 71 .56 • PAGE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER AP-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE D: NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 6685.66 0710, ORKIN EXTERMINATING C* 58744 03y24/98 03/01y98 82.01 VENDOR TOTAL 82.01 P2090 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 58745 03/ 4y98 51522076 02/25/98 682.50 58745 03/24y98 51522077 02/25/98 14.40- VENDOR TOTAL 668. 10 P5915 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE, * 58746 03/24/98 430175 03y11/98 242.82 58746 03/24/98 430168 03y11 /98 205. 12 58746 03/24/98 430152 03/11y98 1212.24 VENDOR TOTAL 1660. 18 R2995 RIVER JUNCTION TREE S* 58747 03/24/98 519 � 03/06/98 7040.00 VENDOR TOTAL 7040.00 R6100 ROWEKAMP ASSOCIATES, * 58/48 03/24/98 9800082 03y02/98 25.00 VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 S0555 SAFETY KLEEN CORP 58749 03/24/98 806018 03/06y98 129.40 VENDOR TOTAL 129.40 S0801 SAINT PAUL PIONEER PR* ' 58750 03/24/98 03y01/98 4/ . 19 VENDOR TOTAL 47. 19 S0 �, SAINT PAUL PIONEER PR* 58751 03/24/98 585942 02y28/98 438.42 �� VENDOR TOTAL 438.42 81205 SCANTRON SERVICE GROU* 58752 03/24/98 10060927 02/23/98 144.54 VENDOR TOTAL 144.54 S2060 SERCO LABS 58753 03y24/98 74059 03y05/98 77.00 VENDOR TOTAL 77.00 83225 SHORT ELLIOTT & HENDR* 58754 03/24y9845679 02/27y98 1342.00 58754 03y24y98 45796 02/28/98 120.05 58754 03y24/98 45795 02/28y98 3297.06 58754 03/24/98 45794 02/28/98 1944.38 VENDOR TOTAL 6703.49 93622 SIGN A-RAMA, USA 58755 03/24/98 03/09/98 56.00 VENDOR TOTAL 56.00 85605 SNYDER'S DRUG STORES,* 58756 03/24/98 03/12/98 5.63 58756 03/24/98 02/20/98 8.50 58756 03y24y98 03/17/98 23.39 VENDOR TOTAL 37,52 86000 SPALDING 58757 03/24/98 50989443 02/18/98 183. 73 S PAGE 8 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER AP-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE D: NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 183.73 861710 SPORTS TECHNOLOGY 58758 03/24/98 . 12/24/97 5875.00 VENDOR TOTAL 5875.00 86250 SPRING LAKE PARK FIRE* 58759 03y24/98 03/09/98 24363.00 58759 03/24y98 03/03/98 5703.00 VENDOR TOTAL 30066.00 S6300 SPRING LAKE PARK LUMB* 58760 03/24/98 187269 02/03/98 74.41 VENDOR TOTAL 74.41 86450 STAR TRIBUNE 58761 03/24/98 143326001 02/28/98 514.50 VENDOR TOTAL 514.50 S7300 STEICHEN'S SPORTING G* 58762 03/24/98 006762 03y03/98 1855.65 VENDOR TOTAL 1855.65 39600 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES 0* 58763 03/24/98 802270097 02/27/98 134.78 58763 03/24/98 802201099 02/20/98 160.34 VENDOR TOTAL 295. 12 T5798 TOLL GAS & WELDING SU* 58764 03y24y98 573936 02/28y98 5.04 58764 03y24/98 143855 03/01y98 6.93 58764 03/24/98 570242 03/01/98 5.58 VENDOR TOTAL 17.55 � UO3�N� U S WEST 58765 03/24y98 03y01/98 31 .55 58765 03y24/98 03/01/98 82.31 58765 03/24/98 03/01y98 117. 13 58765 03/24/98 03y01y98 164 .86 58765 03/24y98 03/01/98 73.85 58765 03/24/98 03/04/98 57.61 58765 03/24/98 03/01y98 139. 15 58765 03/24/98 03y10/98 55.62 58765 03/24/98 03/10y98 38.06 58765 03/24/98 03y10y98 1178.89 58/65 03/24/98 03/13/98 56.04 VENDOR TOTAL 1995.07 U0401 U S WEST COMMUNICATIO* 58768 03/24/98 03/10/98 20.86 58768 03/24/98 03/10/98 20.86 VENDOR TOTAL 41 . 72 U6000 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE* 58769 03y24/98 740128231 03/11/98 130.72 58769 03/24/98 740126829 03/04/98 178.09 58769 03/24/98 740109720 03/01/98 48.61 VENDOR TOTAL 357.42 V2490 VESSCO, INC. 58771 03y24/98 15670 03/02/98 1161 .06 PAGE 9 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER AP C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE D: NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 1161 .06 410 V6600VOSS LIGHTING 58772 03/24/98 2014087-00 03/11/98 362. 10 VENDOR TOTAL 362. 10 W0449 WAI CONTINUUM 58773 03y24y98 4861 02/16/98 51484.44 58773 03/24/98 4862 02/16/98 4122.50 VENDOR TOTAL 55606.94 W1919 WESTERN BANK 58774 03/24/98 03/01/98 50.00 58774 03/24y98 03y01 /98 50.00 VENDOR TOTAL 100.00 Z1000 ZACKS INC 58775 03/24y98 17399 03/05/98 60.51 VENDOR TOTAL 60.51 GRAND TOTAL 292964.60 �� PAGE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGIST| AP-C10-02 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECKCHECK INVOICE INVOICE D. NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT Ni WESTERN BANK * 0 03 /12/98 03y12/98 3051 .73 ��� 0 03y12/98 03/12y98 850.45 ��� VENDOR TOTAL 3902. 18 P2165 MOUNDS VIEW, CITY OF 5758 03/03/98 03y03/98 225.90 VENDOR TOTAL 225.90 G5940 GOVERNMENT TRAINING S* 57584 03/03/98 03y03/98 180.00 VENDOR TOTAL 180.00 T6060 TOTH, PATRICK 57585 03/04y98 02/26/98 47.22 VENDOR TOTAL 47 .22 M0330 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT I* 57586 03/06/98 ^ 03/05/98 280.00 VENDOR TOTAL 280.00 M3440 MIDWEST LANDSCAPES ` 57587 03y09/98 03y09/98 924.85 VENDOR TOTAL 924 .85 N4200 NORTHERN STATES POWER* 57588 03/10/98 03/24/98 5054.71 VENDOR TOTAL 5054.71 P7900 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 57589 03/12/98 03/12/98 5812.47 VENDOR TOTAL 5812.47 W1919 WESTERN BANK 57590 03/12/98 03y12/98 69978.64 57590 03y12/98 03y12y98 10730.90 ��� VENDOR TOTAL 80709.54 10082 IrMA RETIREMENT TRUST* 57591 03/12/98 03/12/98 146.50 VENDOR TOTAL 146.50 H0888 HEALTHPARTNERS 57593 03/12y98 7732546 02/11/98 396.39 VENDOR TOTAL 396.39 P2165 MOUNDS VIEW, CITY OF 57594 03/12/98 03/12/98 94.08 VENDOR TOTAL 94 .08 03185 OFFICE DEPOT, INC. 57595 03y13/98 03/13/98 233.34 VENDORTOTAL 233.34 U6500 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE 59592 03y12/98 03/01/98 593.84 VENDOR TOTAL 593.84 GRAND TOTAL 98601 .02 ���� ���