Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1998/04/06 I CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW WORK SESSION • AGENDA April 6, 1998 6:00 p.m. Items Discussed Per Consensus 1. Discussion of Highway 10 Traffic Light at Edgewood 2. Discussion of Highway 10/City Hall Area Review 3. Discussion of City Hall HVAC 4. Discussion of LMC Trust Insurance Investigation of Water Main Break 5. Discussion of Community Center Construction • 6. Discussion of Traffic Control 7. Discussion of 8265 Spring Lake Road A. Vacation of Utility Easement B. Minor Subdivision to Turnback 50' of Road to City Right of Way 8. Discussion of Employee Health Insurance Premiums 9. Discussion of Chamber of Commerce Report 10. Discussion of District Athletic Field Maintenance Proposal A. Discuss Need for Additional Greenfield Park Netting 11. Discussion of Festival in the Park Beer Garden 12. Discussion of Northwest Youth and Family Services Center Agreement 13. Discussion of Shoreview University Property Development Report 14. Discussion of Mermaid Project Status Report • 15. Discussion of National Youth Golf Center Status Report A. Golf Course Update B. Review Budget and 15 Year Forecast C. Vehicle Purchase for Golf Course . . April 3, 1998 0 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator Re: April 6, 1998 City Council Work Session While it is a long looking agenda, I will need to be brief here. Here's what we have: Item 1 -Highway 10 Traffic Light at Edgewood: We will need some direction and commitment soon on this issue,particularly now since MNDOT has informed the City we just missed out on their funding for the project. Mike will review this since Rick will be out of town. Item 2 - Highway 10/City Hall Area Review: With the above item on the agenda, it is worth reviewing where we are on the negotiations agreement with Anthony Properties. Generally speaking,no too far. The business opportunity available to Anthony Properties last fall has gone by the wayside. Within the last month,Rick and I met with Wendell Smith and his consultant to review the options that may exist. We will be meeting again on Monday afternoon,but I think the question will come down to the future of City Hall and the ball field. Nothing to date suggests anything will be ready prior to the May 2 expiration of the agreement. We can discuss this more on Monday • evening. Item 3 - City Hall HVAC: On light of the two previous items, it would be good to go over this again. Mike will review this with Council. One note,Mike has to leave by 7 p.m. so I have placed these items first on the agenda. Item 4 - Review of Water Main Break: Council asked staff to review the resident concern expressed at the last meeting regarding damage from a water main break. Mike will again review this. Item 5 - Community Center Construction: We can go over a few items having to do with this project. Jerry Linke has asked to discuss a proposal for construction management on the project that he would like to do. While this duplicates the work we have already started,he will be in attendance Monday night. Item 6 - Traffic Control: Tim Ramacher will be in to review Council concerns about traffic management and his plans for addressing those problems. Item 7-8265 Spring Lake Road Items : This will be covered Monday night. Item 8 - Employee Health Insurance Premiums: Bruce will review the new health insurance • premium notices we have received. We are working with the employees to review options now since we have a limited time before committing to renewal or a new policy. We plan on meeting with the employees Monday again. Action eventually for the Council will be to either renew the existing . 0 PEIP plan(now without Medica) or switch to a new plan altogether. Just so it is clear, at this point, no increase in the City's share is contemplated. Item 9- Chamber of Commerce Report: Chamber executive director Carol Frey will be present Monday to brief the Council on Chamber activities. Item 10 -Athletic Fields: Mary Saarion will be present to review the school district-wide efforts to determine a cooperative working arrangement for field maintenance between the school district and the cities. As part of that, an area wide field complex is contemplated, likely for the arsenal property. Mounds View hosts the next meeting of this group on May 5. Item 11 -Festival Beer Garden: I hope to have more on this by the meeting Monday,but so far I have been too swamped to do much. Item 12 - NWYFS Agreement: I wanted to run this past the Council prior to asking approval for it. The Northwest Youth and Family Services Agreement has been redone, mostly at the lead of Roseville. I have had Bob Long review it and advise. I have not worked much on this, but it will be asked to be approved. If you have questions you want me to look into,please advise on Monday. Item 13-Shoreview University Property Development: Shoreview has fmally had a development proposal submitted to them for the University property directly east of Mounds View on County • Road I. There should be little question that this development as proposed could affect traffic use on I and we will want to keep this in mind during the comprehensive plan work this year. Item 14 - Mermaid Project Status: We are still plugging away on this. A report has been put together by Rick for me to review with Council on Monday. Item 15 - National Youth Golf Center and Bridges Report: John Hammerschmidt and I spent some time together this week in response to some issues regarding a large golfing complex proposed in Blaine. We can review with the Council Monday evening along with other issues John has. Item 16 - 1998 LMC Conference: Now is the time to sign up. Let me know Monday. Item 17 - MAC Related Legislation: Some effort has continued and as of this minute a senator from Blaine is holding up senate action on Geri Evans' amendment that even MAC supports. Go figure. Update on Monday. Item 18 - Council Retreat Review: The Council has yet to review January's retreat and make known to the public the results. Please bring your summaries for the dicussion. Item 19- City Administrator Review- Closed Session: Assuming the Council wants to do this, it can do it in a closed session, unless I want it in open session. I would like to have a review and 0 the opportunity to discussion performance along with performance objectives. Assuming a closed session, I placed it last on the agenda. r . s 0 In other business,it has been a busy week. Last week I did secure my top candidate for the Assistant to the City Administrator position. Her name is Cari Schmidt and some of her background is laid out in my This Is It. We agreed to start her at$40,500, or step three as we project it in a proposed wage schedule. I would like to assure the Council that the request to bring Ms. Schmidt in at a higher wage I believe will be a cost effect move that I was not prepared to go into a great deal March 23. Coupled with the apparent lead candidate for the Economic Development Coordinator position, an attorney, I think a concerted effort will be made to reduce legal expenses through greater staff review of our legal documents and processes. For the city government to reduce work force and costs as it has,we will need to review processes that simply are not cost effective if we are to match work output with available dollars. I think these two hires will help work towards that, and it is something that as the year develops, I will want to discuss in earnest with the Council. That's it for now. Have a good weekend. ,io, V ` 3' ,.11. ?i li IIIPRELIMINARY NEGOTIATIONS AGREEM�E�NT - THIS AGREEMENT dated th•is o?L a day of 4......4 a r " , 1997 by and between THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the "City") and THE MOUNDS VIEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a body corporate and politic under the laws of Minnesota ("EDA") and ANTHONY PROPERTIES, a Texas corporation (the "Developer"): WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City and EDA are willing to consider rehabilitation and development of the existing building and surrounding site currently owned by the City and referred to as the Mounds View Community Center site (the "Community Center Property"); and WHEREAS, the Developer has approached the City to discuss development opportunities on City-owned land immediately adjacent to the Community Center Building and on two adjacent privately-owned parcels to undertake a possible development on property identified in Exhibit A (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the City and EDA have reviewed the Project and concur that the Developer • has been designated to prepare a more detailed proposal for a Project pursuant to such terms and conditions as may be established by further negotiations duringthe of between the parties; and term this Agreement WHEREAS, the City, EDA and the Developer are willing and desirous to discuss the possible Project, provided that: (a) the Developer can secure satisfactory private financing sufficient for the completion of a Project; and (b) the City and EDA are satisfied that a Project is economically feasible and in the best interests of the public. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties hereto, IT IS AGREED between the parties as follows: 1. During the term of this Agreement, or any mutually agreed extension thereof, the parties shall use their best efforts to attempt to negotiate and formulate a definitive redevelopment contract (hereinafter "Redevelopment Contract") which shall provide for the development of a Project and shall, at a minimum, contain the following: (a) Terms and conditions concerning the scope and timing of construction of • the project by the Developer and of any public improvements to be constructed in connection with a Project; DJK127914 0 (b) develop a financial plan for the payment of associated public improvements,which plan shall document all public costs,projected public revenues, and bond or note financing, if any, including debt service costs, if necessary; 6. Prior to execution of this Agreement, the Developer shall pay to the EDA the sum of Five Thousand Dollars($5,000) (the "Payment") as a deposit toward reimbursing the EDA and City for all costs incurred in preparing the Redevelopment Contract. If, during the term of this Agreement, the parties execute a Redevelopment Contract, the Payment shall be applied against the Developer's obligation under the Redevelopment Contract to pay any legal, consulting and administrative costs incurred by the City and EDA in preparing the Redevelopment Contract. If the parties do not execute a Redevelopment Contract during the term of this Agreement due to actions of the Developer, the full amount of the Payment shall be retained by the EDA as consideration for its costs in preparing this Agreement and undertaking its obligations hereunder and this Payment shall be the maximum amount of the Developer's obligations owed to the City and EDA in the event no Redevelopment Contract is executed. However, if the parties do not execute a Redevelopment Contract during the term of this Agreement due to the actions of the City and EDA, then the Developer shall be refunded any remaining amount of the Payment that has not been applied to costs incurred by the City and EDA. Except as expressly provided herein, the City, EDA and the Developer shall have no other monetary or other obligation to each other as a result of this Exclusive Negotiations Agreement if they are unable to reach agreement to the terms of an agreed upon Redevelopment Contract, or with respect to a Project, except as • may be expressly provided in an agreed upon Redevelopment Contract. III DJK127914 ^ • ANTHONY PROPERTIES By Its I. _ �'= • This is a signature page to the Preliminary of Mounds View, the Mounds View Economic Development Authority, and band any ng the City Anthony Properties. DJK127914 11.RMne EXHIBIT A • Legal Description of Project Site CITY-OWNED PORTION OF THE COMMUNITY CENTER PROPERTY The vacant land immediately adjacent to the east of the existing Community Center Building generally described as: That part of Lot 16, lying North of a line drawn between the Southeasterly corner of Lot 19 and the Southwesterly corner of Lot 4, except the East 66 feet of said Lot 16; In Block 5, Pinewood Terrace No. 2 (Final Legal Description to be based on Building Survey) Together with the benefits accruing to the owner of the above property under that certain Easement Agreement dated October 12, 1994, file of record October 14, 1994, as Document No. 1072932. Note for Information: Property is Torrens Certificate No. 349901 41) OTHER PARCELS PIN: 08-30-23-24-0054 - Lot 17, Block 5, Pinewood Terrace No. 2 PIN: 08-30-23-24-0055 - Lot 18, Block 5, Pinewood No. 2 4111 DJK127914 MU205-6 A-1 COVER SHEETFAX To: WENDELL SMITH Fax#: 484-0699 Subject: ESTIMATED EDGEWOOD DR. /HIGHWAY 10 IMPROVEMENT COSTS Date: March 30, 1998 Pages: 3, including this cover sheet. COMMENTS: ATTACHED ARE THE ESTIMATED COSTS FOR IMPROVING THE EDGEWOOD DR. / HIGHWAY 10 INTERSECTION. UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS IT WOULD SEEM REASONABLE TO PAY FOR THE CROSS-HATCHED PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED DRAWING. THE ATTACHED TABLE OUTLINES THE ESTIMATED COSTS. PLEASE REVIEW WITH ANTHONY AND LET ME KNOW WHAT • IS POSSIBLE IN LIGHT OF THE STATES REFUSAL TO FUND ANY OF THE IMPROVEMENTS. THE OTHER QUESTION IS WOULD THE PROJECT PROCEED WITHOUT ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO THE INTERSECTION? From the desk of... Rick Jopke Community Development Director City of Mounds View • 2401MN 10 Mounds View,MN 55112 612-717-4021 Fax 612-784-3462 m -IV53) �914031v rrp0 O Omco � Opoc rr r- -< 000700 -1"mm � � 70 Dz � c � zO O 40 r- GDCD --. - 1- 00 -IZZY2 C ccoo 3; 0071 Z zni0bT -1 = r 0 D D Om • n-Imm o Dm 0z DnOptw m m Zmn m cn pm . O * z O -1 I R E X T 0 m m z -1 1111/ . m GO -1 M > m 0 0 D I-- rn4� 4fl � � n CO N 4 V -i CO N W 0 O OOCDcncn00a, 00000000 -1 00000000 00000000 4!944 {yq J .1 N O o o %./, C1 D 0 0 0 O 0 40 49 O -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 m m III r m 4A X - i 4A -J, 41010 -,4 cri O N = D 04,9444/94f9 0 0 0 X 00000000m T, —{ VOUt � WN � R < � � CDoo , lo C o D R. r = mmD - z ,m C D * * Z0r — rOO --. Z 1- 00 --lornZ0 17,III -. . c) . _r, O ._ `co ° ? � zmo � c zo70 ) > - I I � t— I mmm D OCnxiD -< � m n --{ m � o nfn -DjOZxj z = bm -+-, -I z0z0 >"G) mz xl 0) m C) p 74 z = R z -0 x , o 0 m m z --1 0) • m cn M D m v -1 0 D 0) 9 — -a9 — r GJ N A V -aCO NJ COQ OOCDCDcn cn0OGo 00o00000 --1 (mO O O O O o 0 O O O O O O O O 0 69 69 69 C) 69 69 -• -4 409CA 41 N V -► !J1 op O U1 v > 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m 0 m e m o 0 t � m 69 Q .a 69 -a 69 (D I. GJ1 .t�"1J1 O N ID D o 4,/, 4,4 4400073 Transmittal B W Date: 3/ BRW INC. To: C hdt GN)/1 frit (,`�r Aar,ii, r r - 'e,,i 4 (A Planning r 11/ / / '//5)1t,.. 7 / /0 Transportation i(IOW'S (/,,- , ky ' !/�_/y Engineering I Urban Design Thresher SquareFrom: fel) o ��j'QvJ (, i /r700 Third Street So. (� J Minneapolis, T !!� ,� 1 MN 55415 Re: �lrc,h,,,ir�v �� //d 1nT�r�ftCr/x,t' /Te'r ,L 612/370-0700 J Fax 612/370-1378 Item(s): Date: Description: / •nver / /177P C4 370f. Milwaukee Minneapolis Orlando Phoenix Portland San Diego Seattle Purpose: Donald W.Ringrose ❑ as you requested ❑ reply to sender ❑ approved as submitted Richard P.Wolsfeld ❑ for your information ❑ review and return ❑ approved as noted Thomas F.Carroll ❑ for your approval 0 return for corrections ❑ other (see remarks) Craig A.Amundsen Donald E.Hunt John B.McNamara Remarks: />q r Richard D.Pilgrim r Dale N.Beckmann 7rri ;(wort],n-c� o. P/�r�/ jP/ r'�-covn�/P 74 -�zi9r ik ff�Jy y//��O iO iY/l pq. Jeffery L.Benson � rfra� ra�So rIffSCc'SSPs dPc/P4Dfr /i�l D/� 1k lZ � Qre / r,y aid Ce2e,"5 .- Ralph C.Blum / / / Gary J.Erickson 'i • a i 0 e i i Al . .- je John C.Lynch 7ha4 / rweird a) n, (-en .r War- //7Td/7r7'i77C1ta r is /77r /7' t/av Paul N.Bay110 ti / � Sabri Ayazlitt / thA.Ehret thony Heppelmann Copy to: -00<_ 10/ Arijs Pakalns Martha McPhee CBRW 06.91m-44 Howard P.Preston Dennis P.Probst HITY PQO \.\ ARD ' N HILLS TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC STUDY AND REPORT FOR HIGHWAY 96/HIGHWAY 10 INTERCHANGE CONFIGURATION VACH , 1998 B RW • B R W INC. 37951 005 3201 Thresher Square, 700 Third Street So. Minneapolis, MN 55415, Phone 612/370-0700, Fax 612/370-1378 11/ TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC STUDY AND REPORT FOR HIGHWAY 96/ HIGHWAY 10 INTERCHANGE CONFIGURATION CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA MARCH 1998 • BRW, INC. I hereby certify that this plan, specification 700 Third Street South or report was prepared by me or under my Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Statutes Sections 326.02 to 326.16 Gregory . wn, PE Date. .-7 i /(/-g Re_• No.:��f/4/ . .0 r4, 1a. Anthony ' ..-1 � • 1 PE • File: 37951 005 3201 Date: /(Z I6/g Reg. No.: I 73&5 �( • I„ March 16, 1998 B R W INC. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Arden Hills 1450 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 ATTN: Mr. Brian Fritsinger City Administrator RE: Transportation/Traffic Study and Report for the Highway 96/Trunk Highway 10 Interchange Configuration Planning Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: Transportation Engineering The enclosed report has been prepared to evaluate alternative configurations of the Highway fi ban Design 96 and Highway 10 interchange in the northwest area of the city as authorized by the City Council at the January 5, 1998, Council meeting. The intersection will be reconstructed as a part of the ongoing reconstruction of the Highway 96 corridor in Ramsey County. The Thresher Square existing intersection is an at-grade signalized intersection. The report will address alternative 700 Third Street So. intersection configurations includingseparated grade with varying levels of access betweenMinneapolis, the two roadways. MN 55415 612/370-0700 The scope of the study includes the evaluation of existing traffic patterns,traffic modeling of Fax 612/370-1378 alternative access scenarios in the region,evaluation of multiple access scenarios at the Highway 10 and Highway 96 intersection itself. Preliminary layouts of alternatives as well as Denver a summa of Milwaukee summary P ro e P rty and cost implications of each alternative are also included with the report. Minneapolis Newark Information utilized in the preparation of this report includes aerial mapping, as-built plans, Orlando the Arden Hills geographical information system, preliminary layout plans for Highway 96, Phoenix data provided by City staff, and other information from field investigations and surveys of the Portland site. All available information was reviewed and considered to complete the report. San Diego Seattle Sincerely, BRW, INC. • Gregory . rown, PE, BRW,Inc. •nt ony .e••el`�:l nn, PE,BRW, Inc. Arden it City Engineer Vice Presi TABLE OF CONTENTS S INTRODUCTION 1 EXHIBIT 1: LOCATION MAP • BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 EXHIBIT 2: EXISTING CONDITIONS REGIONAL TRAFFIC MODEL 5 EXHIBIT 3: TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS TABLE 1: PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE TABLE 2: PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES AND GEOMETRICS • HIGHWAY 10/HIGHWAY 96 INTERCHANGE LAYOUTS 10 OTHER ISSUES/CONSIDERATIONS. 12 PROJECT BUDGET COSTS 16 PROPERTY IMPACTS 17 SUMMARY 18 APPENDIX A: BUDGET CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES • Introduction • On January 5, 1998, the Arden Hills City Council ordered the preparation of a transportation study to evaluate the possible reconfiguration of the intersection of Highway 96 and Trunk Highway 10 in the northwest portion of the City. The purpose of the transportation study is to develop alternatives for the interchange which would maintain adequate access to local residents and businesses while improving overall traffic flow in the area. Due to the proximity of the interchange with the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant(TCAAP)property, the analysis also incorporates the effects that the redevelopment of the TCAAP site would have on the intersection. Mapping and other information regarding existing and future land uses, access and routes was compiled by BRW to generate a predictive traffic model of the area. The model was run simulating existing conditions as well as three alternative future access scenarios. The results of the traffic model were then used to determine the likely consequences of the alternative access scenarios to assist in the decision making process. A detailed analysis of access ramps and associated construction at the Highway 96/Highway 10 intersection was made in order to determine the impacts of the accesses with respect to construction parameters,property acquisition and relocation/modification of other roadways and utilities. • BRW also investigated the existing accesses onto Highway 10 north of Highway 96 to determine whether some improvements would be needed or recommended to be completed in conjunction with the Highway 96 improvements. 110 1 :• t Gi4y:37 ii. �9tb p. 0.4k e w a !: ®7.7.441 a.�C i xuna MN NILLYIIY p. (/ amm k� �ti '*+W� • I a,� d �j a. w. amp 10. . .1 s q, RAU= a. V B' ! i a `2© SO. 071[9®CI. a at .,1ppp 0 : 3 \ 0791(. b. I ': 0>- a TAY & D. 101.1111115. Y� !OIL 3. N: SW YIMIMS O TEL r M bbb ul�►1 MX B 10,• v. STATE Z. tura VIP IL TRW RV t `t DRIVERS I w . tur • EXAM, W. NUDE IA. aSTAT IOW et. L . Mil ; a X. TRW� A® NOV 11. N. 1110101115 0. D. p00lll C IA. LAM N. js Ib: Trolle N. 9atHMt1 I. It. mt SAL lila9,A7 re ga C T'[ t Court Tr• ,me : s. NOM=CT. MEN IL M v M. 70. STRAIT=MC. K. NMI=a. 76.MID= 91Y M. apatA a. P ID. .tMO rs109C INN par GI6M I SI. [01017 ACrt91 tA.N. �� � _, M. I.QM CIL t 11 y. M. S.NOUS CIL 10 N2,541 \>t 1' \. • S. L mM CM. 6Mp ° PROJE T LO-GATION e. .0 v C3 ii Y. t r AN't b. t. i,t11 , , tl11,� dll.r. M R I nM In10 • X. IL Lei Mia a. S t: j'. tlo� Troller ARDEN HILLS D. I. USX EAaa. ��_ "pM°0°^ tAppl ®p•' !8 Court 1990 POP. 9199 t..me mcu. tc t twaYry it. Yn p. X. IM MO IT. '1 a. roma tee a. a. 4 N. r�t01 LA. € maw= te. t"o X. [10/11,9 M. M. eY,9tM1 CM. 1 ar•�I 'S) WIN T. RV. I \ tl Rt4. o' e y • • \ 'h .\\,,,v4., 31. Q e s R a (� O Troi ler• apr IAA M+ ! S "11 Pork SWIM © i a' Tt91 1071 L9b ¢ SOLOSSOLI BRIGHTON 0 n r� t� 1990 POP. y D 22.207 ■ Q ; ,_..6 illtilku 44,M,ucM WS r-,.r ' 11 se N i. OYiItYi CI. E3 EL\ d C3 i S Yt ...off e.L oi. pleb!CM. vb. {f� g "o°' I illta M. 4' e: r�0t Ma.' • s. eg ow.' esa. f.mock , In. i Nth n. %. 't DA M[. i 4 � �':ISOM a�tot• ~® �,� tai ll MIN r V i LAW 1a1"ST. ,1"` ♦y1q,u as >~ .1M 0101" i SIN t. A1[. 'r... IiYNfI1[K a,® E J1101 Ca. e. [taw 10. ti 4 6 rau��/ a' eorlro ' Y - a y i a.t. r - 1 M tt, re M. Mit Mt. 3 i i war Pe r I m. /t �� MM g <® ® at rd� ? © ro Ireuntlion• V.:, ` 3i 211.1 T au yy 6 CRYSTAL LOGe `;\ WNW 6 p, OI'/lfAt YV• Y A e.. IC- b. ��� m M.— ‘ : ��® p ® a r , 61 IeLIr[M07t KO PIS M. �— 0 1000 1 1=40,000 ::•; C:IT ' CSF 9ARDEN HILLS HIGHWAY 96/HIGHWAY 10 INTERCHANGE CONFIGURATION • 13 R \V B It W INC. PROJECT LOCATION MAP Thresher Square,700 Third Street So. EXHIBIT 1 Minneapolis,MN 55415,Phone 011/3700700, Fax 83213701378 33943-005-3201 Background/Existing Conditions S The study area incorporates approximately the northern third of the City of Arden Hills as well as neighboring communities. The study area boundaries include Lexington Avenue on the east, Interstate Highway 694 on the south,Interstate Highway 35W on the west and County Road I on the north. Exhibit 2 illustrates the study area, arterial roadway network and neighborhoods/ businesses. Major arterials located within the study area include the following: Highway 96 is an east-west running four lane divided highway carrying approximately 17,000 vehicles per day. Highway 96 is a Ramsey County highway recently turned back from MnDOT. Highway 10 is a southeast-northwest running four lane limited access divided highway carrying approximately 37,000 vehicles per day. Highway 10 is a MnDOT Trunk Highway which splits from Interstate 694 just west of Hamline Avenue and merges with Interstate 35W just south of County Road H2. Old Highway 10 is a north-south running arterial carrying approximately 2,600 vehicles per day. Old Highway 10 functions as a collector"spine" for the City beginning off of Highway 51 in the southern part of the city and terminating at Highway 96 approximately 400 feet west of the Highway 10 intersection. • Hamline Avenue is a north-south running arterial carrying approximately 12,000 vehicles per day. The portion of Hamline Avenue included in the study runs between Highway 96 to the north and Interstate 694 to the south. Hamline Avenue is a Ramsey County roadway. Through southbound traffic on Hamline Avenue merges into Highway 51 south of Interstate 694. Access between Hamline Avenue and Interstate 694 is restricted to movements to and from the east and north only. West Round Lake Road/Gateway Boulevard is a north-south running collector carrying approximately 2,000 vehicles per day. This roadway is currently named West Round Lake Road but is schedule to be renamed to Gateway Boulevard in the near future. The exhibits included with this report refer to the roadway as Gateway Boulevard. Gateway Boulevard is an Arden Hills State Aid street and is scheduled to be reconstructed with raised medians and concrete curb and gutter during the 1999 construction season. Gateway Boulevard provides access to the Gateway Business District from Highway 96. The roadway is located adjacent to Interstate 35W. Snelling Avenue is a north-south running collector carrying approximately 800 vehicles per day. Snelling Avenue is an Arden Hills State Aid street which provides access to the neighborhoods and churches located between Hamline Avenue and Highway 10. • 2 The study area includes a number of distinct neighborhoods, businesses and government lands. The following is a summary of existing properties in the area by geographical location: Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant(TCAAP): This is by far the single largest land use in the study area. The TCAAP site covers approximately 2,300 acres and extends from Highway 96 to County Road I and from Highway 10 to Lexington Avenue. The major accesses to the site are on Highway 96 at Snelling and Hamline Avenues and accesses off of Highway 10 and County Road H2. The site is anticipated to be redeveloped entirely within the next twenty years. Future uses include commercial, retail, government,recreation/open space and a variety of housing. Highway 10/96 Triangle: This group of properties is bound by Highway 10 on the east, Highway 96 on the south and Interstate 35W on the west. The properties include approximately six single family homes, Scherer Bros. Lumber Company, the Big Ten Supper Club and the Arden Manor Mobile Home Park. Current access to the neighborhood is from one entrance on Highway 96 into the mobile home park and one entrance on Highway 10 to a service road which parallels Highway 10. Scherer Bros. Lumber has a separate access onto Highway 10. The area is split by a Minnesota Commercial Rail Spur which crosses Highway 10 and enters the TCAAP site. Gateway Business District(GBD): This group of properties includes several existing businesses with plans for significant business development around the southern end of 111 Round Lake. The GBD is served by Gateway Boulevard(a cul de sac)only which connects to Highway 96. The alignment of the connection of Gateway Boulevard to Highway 96 will be modified later in 1998 to provide greater separation from the Interstate 35W access ramps. Round Lake Residences: This group of properties consists of residential units along Old Highway 10 between Interstate 694 and Highway 96. The properties are generally single family units fronting Old Highway 10 with some multi-family located off of short cul de sacs near the southeast shore of Round Lake. The neighborhood has access to the south and access to Highway 96 via Old Highway 10. North Heights Church Triangle: Two churches are situated in the southeast corner of the Highway 96 and Highway 10 intersection. North Heights church is a regional church drawing members from several miles away. The facility can accommodate over 2,500 people and therefor generates a fair amount of traffic on Sundays and other special occasions. The adjacent Ukrainian Orthodox church has a much smaller membership. Access is provided off of Highway 96 and Snelling Avenue. Arden Hills City Hall: The current city hall is located along the south side of Highway 96 just east of Keithson Drive. A new city hall is planned to be constructed on the north side of Highway 96 between Hamline Avenue and Lexington Avenue. Access to Arden Hills City Hall is directly off of Highway 96. • 3 03/19/98 THU 09:38 FAX 612 373 4650 ELNESS SWENSON 21001 JWL CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING . • FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FROM: Mr. Chuck Whiting Jerry Linke (612) -373-4642 [work COMPANY: DATE: City of Mounds View March 19,1998 FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO.OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 784-3462 3 PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: 784-3055 (612)-717-4398 RE: REFERENCE NUMBER: Attached Specification Sheets - X URGENT 0 FOR REVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY 0 PLEASE RECYCLE NOTES/COMMENTS: • Chuck, Here is the changes to the General Conditions that I mentioned to you last night We do this in the Specification Document in Division 0.Item E which changes Article 7_Changes in the Work is the part that I find is invaluable in saving the owner money on changes.This is the type of thing that I can bring to the City in the way of experience and knowledge.I will be forwarding my proposal by the end of work Friday,March 20,1998,and will be at the Council Meeting on Monday to answer any questions. 41111 2319 KNOLL DRIVE MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA 03/19/98 THU 09:39 FAX 612 373 4650 ELNESS SWENSON x003 Page 3 • ` Peace Memorial village shall arrange for installation of sewer(SAC), electrical, gas, water (WAC) and other utilities required except as specified elsewhere. The owner will pay SAC and WAC charges. The contractor shall make arrangements for any required inspections, and pay any associated fees and shall obtain the Certificate of Occupancy for the project." 4. Add to paragraph 3.12.7: "The architect shall have a right to rely on the adequacy of the design when the contract documents require materials, equipment or systems to be designed by an engineer or licensed professional. D. Article 5 - Subcontractor 1. Add the following subparagraph 5.2.5: "Acceptance of any materials, supplier or subcontractor shall not imply acceptance of any material or product not specified in the contract documents." E. Article 7 -Changes in the Work 1. Add to paragraph 7.3.4: Costs related to a change shall be direct costs. All indirect costs shall be included in the contractor's overhead. Overhead (including general conditions) and profit related to a change shall be limited to 10% of the net cost of work by the contractor and 10% of the cost of work by subcontractors. Subcontractor mark-up is similarly limited. F. Article 9 - Payments and Completion 1. Revise subparagraph 9.6.2 by adding a new subparagraph 9.6.2.1 to read as follows: 9.6.2.1 Until Substantial Completion, the Owner will pay 95 percent of the amount due the III Contractor on account of progress payment. Upon Substantial Completion, the Owner may reduce retainage to 2 percent and pay 98 percent of the amount due the Contractor on account of progress payment until Final Payment. G. Article 11 - Contractor's Liability Insurance 1. Revise subparagraph 11.1.1 by adding a new subparagraph 11.1.1.8 to read as follows: 11.1.1.8 Liability insurance shall include all major divisions of coverage and be on a comprehensive basis including: 1. Premises Operations 2. Independent Contractor's Protective. 3. Products and Completed Operations. 4. Personal Injury Liability with Employment Exclusion deleted. 5. Contractual, including specified provision for Contractor's obligation under Paragraph 4.18. 6. Owned, non-owned and hire motor vehicles. 7. Broad Form Property Damage including Completed Operations. 8. Umbrella Excess Liability. 2. Add the following paragraph 11.1.4: "Contractor's Liability Insurance -The contractor will, during the life of the contract, purchase and maintain insurance coverages and limits as follows: 3. Revise subparagraph 11.1.2 by adding a new subparagraph as follows: 11.1.2.1 The insurance required by subparagraph 11.1.1 shall be written for not less than the following or greater if required by law: • 1. Worker's Compensation: a. State: Statutory b. Applicable Federal (e.g. Longshoremen's): Statutory c. Employer's Liability: $300,000 each accident/disease $500,000 aggregate DIVISION _ _ Item No. 10 Staff Report No. III Meeting Date: April 6. 1998 Type of Business: WIC WIC:Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Mary Saarion, Director of Parks, Recreation &.Forestry Item Title/Subject: Quarterly Report - Proposal for School District Date of Report: April 2, 1998 The Mounds View School District is looking into options and opportunities to contract school grounds maintenance services to other entities. The School District does not have the manpower, expertise nor equipment to upkeep school grounds and athletic fields. Carl Colmark, Director of Finance, Facilities and Operations has requested the cities of Arden Hills, Mounds View, New Brighton and Shoreview to provide the School District with a proposal to maintain athletic field areas for schools within their city boundaries. The City of Mounds View has two schools, Pinewood Elementary and Edgewood Middle School. The athletic field areas of these two schools is estimated at 16 acres. •mewood School fields have under-developed turf areas including one field that has been"let go", one larger softball/baseball field with a full infield and one small grass infield baseball field. These areas are used as multi-purpose areas for school track, soccer and other activities of the physical education department. For years the water runoff from the school building and surrounding paved areas washout out field soils and grasses. As a result, there is poor soils and little grass on much of the field areas. There is no irrigation which makes seeding and turf establishment difficult. Because Pinewood School athletic fields are not in high demand by community group athletic organizations, improvements to the field area is probably not a priority at this time. Maintenance proposed for Pinewood School grounds is proposed for regular maintenance. Edgewood Middle School on the other hand has irrigated fields which are used for Irondale High School competitive athletic leagues including baseball, fast-pitch softball, soccer and football. Because of the high level of competition, irrigation and community use and demand, these athletic fields have high priority for maintenance which requires a high quality maintenance program. The proposal offers a total turf management program to re-vitalize Edgewood Middle School athletic fields. The School District has indicated that this would be a program that they would be in favor of. This proposal is scheduled to be presented and reviewed by the School District in a few weeks. Staff invites questions or concerns from the Mayor and City Council before this proposal is provided to the School District. PROPOSAL i GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FOR PINEWOOD AND EDGEWOOD SCHOOLS •• • Presented by City of Mounds View Parks,Recreation & Forestry Department May, 1998 411 I • SCHOOL GROUNDS MAINTENANCE BUDGET PROPOSAL MOWING: * Mowing at Pinewood once per week, weather permitting. * Mowing at Edgewood twice per week and sometimes 3 times depending upon weather. * Lease Cushman mower 12' cut, 4 wheel drive necessary for cutting hills at schools. * 24 week program, May 1 - October 31. AERATION: Upon evaluation of the turf at both schools, it is determined that aeration is the primary requirement for immediate improvement - soils are too packed, hard and impenetrable. Aeration would be with City owned golf course aerator that goes down 5-6 inches, allowing oxygen, nutrients, & water to permeating and loosening soils. * Aeration estimated to take 36 hours each time. Recommendation is 3 aerations for each site for a total of 216 hours. * City to use own tractor and aerator. 411)TOPDRESSING: Topdressing to occur 2 times with topsoil. * Estimated time is 36 hours for topdressing tasks. * City to use city owned equipment. SEEDING: Slit seeding to occur in late August on all fields. * City to use own equipment * Regular Parks worker to perform task * Estimated 32 bags of seed at $80/bag BROADLEAF SPRAYING Spraying for broadleafs would occur once in the Spring after plants have bloomed and once again in the Fall. * City to use own equipment. •* Chemical cost estimated to be $600 for two applications. Mar-26-98 12 : 37PP.01 o Post-It'Fax Note 7671 Date pegMl _14:s* -i To Y1 Fr.—FT-1.u, — ( CoJDePtf ' rte► y kCo. Q L,...... ` . Pron;M 717 — NVK ( Phoneu 333 '3 �'7 Ei Fax r 7„Y • — 3 c1G Z Fax R 33 3 — S'To 3 Ainsidaan Equipment Leeeing FINANCING PROPOSAL. 5 Cor ResCPA 1Dive 0 A704 TO: Cushman Motor Co., Inc. �� , DATED: 3125198 FAX 5510)77546 03 ate lite: rittp://www.iete3Se-com Thank you for the opportunity to propose the following equipment leasing 'oat nserketeselease.can solution for Cushman Motor Co.. Inc.. All of us at American Equipment Leasing (AEL) appreciate this opportunity to earn your business. Equipment Type: Turf Equipment Total Invoice Price From Suppliers: $32,700.00 Base Term: 36 Months Municipal A.P.R.: 6.58% (36) Level Monthly Payments of: $998.00 Base Term Rent The Initial term of the lease is 36 months. Each lease payment is equal to .03052% (lease factor) of the total invoice price(s)from supplier(s). The initial number of payments is 36. All tease payments quoted are net of all applicable taxes, maintenance and insurance. Supplier Payment Process: AEL will pay your selected supplier(s)upon your acceptance of the leased property, and your authorization, under the terms of the supplier(s)invoice. 010 Due at Signing: When AEL prepares and provides dosingdocuments, a check in the aunt of$1,148.00 Is required. This will be applied as first monthy rental and documentation fee. 0.00 Lease Termination: Upon expiration of the original document, and providing all terms have been met,you will purchase the leased assets for$100.00. Payment lnformation_ Payments are monthly and in advance unless othe.wise noted, and are net of applicable taxes, insurance and any other sums you may be responsible for under the terms of the lease. At the time of this proposal. the full-life U.S.Treasury Note is 5.55%. If the full-life U.S. Treasury Note has increased at the time the tease is commenced,the lease payment offered in this proposal will increase on a pro-rata basis. Documentation Fee: $150.00 Good Faith Proposal Only: Please note that this is a proposal only and represents a preliminary description of the possible terms of a future transaction. This proposai cannot define all of the possible terms and conditions of the proposed transaction. AEL's acceptance of any deposit is not intended to be a commitment to enter into a lease, nor is it intended to obligate AEL to you in any way. AEI.has not yet sought the Internal credit approval to finalize this lease offering. This approval would be subject to AEL's Mute due diligence,analysis and consideration. The proposed terms and conditions listed here must be approved by AEL's internal credit group,at which point,execution and delivery of documentation satisfactory in form and substance to AEL would follow. Also, the terms of this proposal may be m;oditied during this credit review process and/or AEL maydecide to dedins the application. Sin erely, y A. Murray Nionai Sales Representative EL Golf Division 800-235-7368 ext. 294 COMMERCIAL ��+°F •_:;. 110Q7�CYI IIl1t t'39 a 1998 SERVICE ;:UT '!„ E r �aJ�� • ti LSI...Il��pW�/�,280� y� �:" _ minmommommommimmommiminur AGREEMENT y 4 ! F 73 • ," 1... r'ITtl� Y-".`�""1 MN 1O�OZ 'PEATY BILLTO PINEWOOD ELEMENTARY CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 5500 QUINCY STREET 2401 HIGHWAY 10 411. MOUNDS VIEW, MN 55112 MOUNDS VIEW, MN 55112 ATTN: MARY SAARION 717-4041 FAX 784-346', liv. UT -VIC - . Ip ■ - 1 : -T -TMENT 'DESCRIPTION COST TREATMENT DESCRIPTION .. COST .,Y ❑ PRE-EMERGENT FOR ❑ BROADLEAF WEED CONTROL 1.EARLY ❑ SUPERIOR HORTICULTURE OIL . •NG CRABGRASS CONTROL 0 NATURAL FERTILIZER SPRING 0 INSECT CONTROL . ❑ FERTILIZATION ❑ INSECT CONTROL ❑ DISEASE CONTROL ❑ WEED CONTROL 0 0 0 PRE-EMERGENT FOR ❑ FERTIUZATION 2 LATE Q FERTILIZATION . 'N▪G CRABGRASS CONTROL 0 NATURAL FERTILIZER SPRING 0 ROOT ZONE FERTILIZATION Q BROADLEAF WEED 0 INSECTCANTROt. ❑ - ❑ • 0 t ❑ FERTILIZATION 0 NATURAL FERTILIZER S.EARLY Q INSECT CONTROL(SPRAY APPLICATIONS) AMR ❑ INSECT CONTROL : SUMMER ❑ DISEASE CONTROL(SPRAY APPLICATIONS) • . ❑ BROADLEAFW • r EED 0 , .'�,L - Q . .. • .. •..- CONTROL Q ft • .. ❑ ••:L..a:, v: ti __ .. _ E ❑ FERTIUZATION 0 NATURAL FERTILIZER 4.LATE ❑ INSECT CONTROL(SPRAY APPLICATIONS) NMER • • -- ' ❑ INSECT CONTROL SUMMER 0 DISEASE CONTROL(SPRAY APPLICATIONS) • - ❑ BROADLEAF DE F WEED 0 CONTROL ❑ ❑ ❑ . 9.Y ❑ FERTIUZATION ❑ NATURAL FERTIUZER • 5.EARLY 0 INSECT CONTROL(SPRAY APPLICATIONS) 1 .. •• • •• -- - 0 INSECT CONTROL FALL ❑ DISEASE CONTROL(SPRAY APPLICATIONS) ❑ BROADLEAF WEED . ❑ - . 0 ROOT ZONE FERTIUZATION . CONTROL. . Q . ._ ❑ .. .. . • .. 'E 0 FERTILIZATION• .- 0 PRE-EMERGENT FOR WINTER - •. 3 . 6.LATE .. ,0 FERTILIZATION ❑ ROOT ZONE FERTILIZATION '_ LI. ❑ NATURAL FERTILIZER WEED CONTROL. Fes- '' ❑ INSECT CONTROL ❑ BRBT ADLEAF WEED 0 INSECT CONTROL 0 DISEASE CONTROL TROL'"CIAL TION Q PRE-EMERGENT FOR WEED T.SPECIAL ❑ FERTILIZATION 0 ROOT ZONE FERTIUZATION RAL FERTIUZER CONTROL SERVICES 0 INSECT CONTROL. WEED 0 INSECT CONTROL ❑ DISEASE CONTROL 0 0 ANNUAL LAWN CARE COST . . ��:":ANNUAL TREE AND SHRUB CARE COST BENEFICIAL SERVICES I BENEFICIAL SERVICES JME' " .. -- •.:- ' .._.;. --. .. ... __ .._ • • _-. 0 TRUNK INJECTION -• : -• .: --- - ERATION.- 2.....,..: - - - .. - .- ❑TRIM AND SHAPE'- _._ ••- - • . ':RATION/SEEDING " - - ' .-: ._:_ • •._ - - 0 SHEARING • .•. - EEDING •_• -.• - .• - _ . . - '- . ' - . ._ - . 0 WINTER PROTECTION _ - _ . " .. - 'LUGGING . 0 . 'IJNGICIDE •._ ' .. _ . . _. 0 - • _ _ . NNSECT CONTROL" - -. - - . - - - _ 0 _ - IEGETATION CONTROL IN JUNE ^ 50).00 0 — _ . • • - EGETATION CDYtit L .. IN AUGUST 40).0) 0 '_'.-: - - _ � 0 -•-- - : ANNUAL BENEFICIAL SERVICES COST • • - - ' - ANNUAL BENEFICIAL SERVICES COST ". ..'"- .-TOTAL SALES TAX - - : : . .• TOTAL SALES TAX 4 OF AGREEMENT: ❑1 YEAR ❑2 YEAR '- ❑3 YEAR TERM OF AGREEMENT: ❑I YEAR 0 2 YEAR ❑3 YEAR ,IMENTS: COMMENTS: • ' 4 fox, x, 4Traceeantl3 All Rights R...n"a• 6=4.0 TOTAL ANNUAL SERVICE COST AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE• ", .1 /' W s': '' :1• DATE MOUNDS VIEW COMMUNITY CENTER • ESTIMATED ANNUAL REVENUES FOR 1999 Children's Home Society Lease Agreement Payment $45,000 School District Lease Agreement Payment 50,000 Facility Rentals 34,525 Vending Machine Revenues 16,000 Total $145,525 ESTIMATED ANNUAL EXPENSES FOR 1999 Regular Salaries- Evening Facility Coordinator $24,000 Part Time Salaries - 'A time Custodian 12,000 Weekend Facility Coordinators 36 hrs/wkend 18,720 • Pensions 5,546 Group Insurance 3,960 Worker's Compensation 4,372 Operating Materials& Supplies 7,500 Telephone Service 4,512 Electricity 15,000 Heating/AC 9,000 Debris Removal 9,500 Rental Equipment 1,000 Bonds& Insurance 4,200 Repairs to bldg and equipment 7,000 Sales Tax 1,600 Capital Outlay 0 Total $114,214 • Item No. to A Staff Report No. Meeting Date: April 3, 1998 I/ Type of Business: WIC WK Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Mary Saarion, Director of Parks, Recreation & Forestry Item Title/Subject: Authorization to purchase additional netting for Greenfield Baseball Field for purpose of protecting property and persons from foul balls. Date of Report: March 31, 1998 The Parks and Recreation Commissioners have reviewed and discussed options for protecting property and persons in the area of Greenfield Park during baseball games. The problem is that foul balls are hit on a regular basis up and over the backstop with baseballs landing in the parking lot, tot lot and bleachers or onto the walking path. The City has received numerous complaints of foul balls damaging cars, landing near park users, and flying into the back yards of nearby properties. The options for reducing baseball foul balls is to eliminate baseball games at Greenfield Park or provide additional netting to keep the balls from leaving the field area. Staff has obtained price estimates on 0 additional netting to span over the homeplate area, catching foul balls that are hit straight up. The net will in turn discontinue any homeplate foul ball plays. However, the Parks and Recreation Commissioners believe that there is a higher priority to provide for increased safety. The cost estimates for purchasing netting to span the area between two existing poles, across the homeplate area is approximately$2,000 for cost of netting, cable and hooks. Parks staff would need to install the netting with cable and hooks with the use of an lift. Staff has contacted the baseball users of Greenfield Park baseball field (Irondale Baseball League and Babe Ruth Baseball League) to request assistance in funding this field improvement. Neither league was interested in participating since they indicated that they do not have funding available for this expense. Board Directors indicated that they felt it was the responsibility of the City to provide a safe environment for the baseball facility. Parks and Recreation Commissioners were disappointed with this reply from the user leagues. The City has forwarded damage claims to the City's insurance trust. The result has been that the City has not been deemed liable, rather that the individual batter is liable. However it is quite clear that youth batters will most likely never be identified. Staff has pursued information from other cities regarding damage waivers by user leagues or damage deposits. However, no cities were found to have incorporated this in their facility user permits. Commissioners realize that while the individual batter is actually liable for damages or injuries, it is just as likely that the City will be perceived as responsible for damages or injuries. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission and staff, to request authorization from the City Council to use Park Improvement Funds to purchase additional netting 0 to be installed at Greenfield Baseball Field to span over the area of homeplate, at a cost not to exceed $2,000. 0 interoffice MEMORANDUM to: Parks and Recreation Commissioners from: Mary Saarion subject: Consideration of Park Projects date: February 18, 1998 There are a few park improvement projects that I believe are necessary and wish to bring them to your attention for consideration. One is the need for additional netting at Greenfield Park baseball field. The Commission witnessed this need last summer as we met and saw the many foul tipped balls that went into the park, one hitting Councilmember Gunn's car denting it. There is a need to extend netting across the homeplate area which would catch a number of balls that are foul tipped straight up and over. This would also take away the homeplate foul plays. As was suggested last year, I requested the Baseball Association to contribute money for the netting. They discussed this with their Board Members. It was their conclusion that the City should provide whatever is necessary for the field since it is a park field, and they are park users. They said that they did not have money for such expenses. They do not have a capital expense fund for field improvements like Little Lakes Little League has. There are options that the Commission should discuss. One is that the City pay for the netting 0 improvements with Parks Improvement Funds. Costs would be from $1,600 - $9,000 depending upon the extent of additional netting. Another option would be to change the field into a softball field which would greatly reduce the number and type of foul balls and related damages, and would provide an excellent field for girls fastpitch and adult softball leagues. However, taking away the field for older baseball leagues including Babe Ruth would put these leagues in a pinch since there are few"big fields" for this age group in the school district. The only other are school baseball fields one at Irondale and one at Mounds View High School,,one at Edgewood and one at McCullam Park in Shoreview. Liability is a problem for the City with the current status of the field proximity to homes and the older baseball users of this field. The adjacent properties are too close and baseball at that level results in too many foul balls. Options seem to be either additional netting or change in field use, (users) . Staff requests Commission's direction in this matter. • * 11 III MEMORANDUM TO: Bruce Kessel FROM: Scott Riggs DATE: March 20, 1998 RE: Necessary Changes to Permit Beer Garden Bruce: Per your request, here is a summary memorandum of the issues involved and/or changes necessary to permit a "beer garden" on City park property. Please note that I have also briefly discussed this matter with Chuck Whiting. 0 In order to facilitate the Festival-in-the-Park "beer garden," changes to the following Municipal Code sections appear to be required, depending upon what type of license the event sponsor desires: Code Section 909.07, Subd_ 11 would have to be modified to permit alcoholic beverages in whatever City park is to be utilized for the event. The City's Code Section 503.03, Subd. 3, as to temporary non-intoxicating [this term is no longer permitted by state statute and should be changed to "3.2 percent malt liquor." see Minn. Stat. § 340A.411, Subd. 3] license would have to be possibly modified as to the length of time the entity requesting the license has been in existence (a requirement not found in state statute) and possibly as to the location of the event. rSee Minn. Stat. § 340A.403. Subd. 21. Code Section 502.03. Subd. 6, as to a temporary intoxicating liquor special event license would have to be modified possibly as to the location of the event. Please note however, that the length of time the entity requesting this license has been in existence cannot be less than three (3) years for this license based upon the City Code and state statute. Lies Minn. Stat. § 340A.404, Subd. 10j. This section also permits a licensee to contract for intoxicating liquor catering services. Depending upon the location of the event, Code Section 502.15, as to zoning restrictions, • 5JP140247 "N125-65 9ZP—d 80/ZO d 99P-1 Ol£61££ZL9 N3AVE 7 A43NN3N—Wold wdlg:170 86-OZ-JEYI 503.01 503.01 • CHAPTER 503 NONINTOXICATING LIQUOR SECTION: 503.01: Definitions 503.02: License Required 503.03: License Classifications 503.04: Eligibility for License 503.05: Application for License 503.06: License Fees 503.07: Proof of Financial Responsibility 503.08: Investigation of Application; Hearing; Issuance or Denial 503.09: Conduct of Business; Conditions of License 502.10: Hours of Sales 503.11: Suspension or Revocation of License • 503.12: Violation of Provisions • • . 503.01: DEFINITIONS: Subd. 1. BEER or NONINTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR: Any malt beverage with an alcoholic content of more than one-half of one percent (0.5%) by volume and not more than three and two-tenths percent (3.2%) by weight. Subd. 2. BEER STORE: An establishment for the sale of beer, cigars, cigarettes, all forms of tobacco, beverages and soft drinks at retail. Subd. 3. BONA FIDE CLUB: A club organized for social or business purposes or for intellectual improvement or for the promotion of sports, where the serving of beer is incidental to and not the major purpose of the club. Subd. 4. INTOXICATING LIQUOR: Any distilled, fermented or vinous beverage containing more than three and two-tenths percent (3.2%) of alcohol by weight. Subd. 5. MINOR: Any person who has not reached the age of nineteen (19) as of their last • birthday. Subd. 6. ORIGINAL PACKAGE: The bottle or sealed container in which the liquor is placed by the manufacturer. City of Mounds View 502.03 502.03 (Rev. 10/96) Subd. 3. On-Sale Wine Licenses': On-sale wine licenses shall be issued to restaurants meeting the qualifications of Minnesota Statutes, Section 340.11, subdivision 20 and shall permit only the sale of wine not exceeding fourteen percent (14%) alcohol by volume, for consumption on the licensed premises only, in conjunction with the sale of food. Subd. 4. Sunday Sales: Special on-sale Iicenses for the sale of intoxicating liquor on Sunday separate from a regular on-sale license issued pursuant to Section 502.02 of this Chapter shall be issued to hotels, restaurants or clubs, as defined in subdivision 501.01(1) of this Title, which have facilities for serving not less than thirty (30) guests at one time. Subd. 5. Bottle Clubs: Bottle clubs are regulated by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 340.119. (1988 Code §100.02) Subd. 6. Temporary Intoxicating Liquor Special Event. A temporary special event intoxicating liquor Iicense may be issued to a club, or charitable, religious or other nonprofit organization which has been in existence for at Ieast three (3) years. The license may authorize the sale of intoxicating liquor on-sale for not more than three (3) consecutive days and may authorize the sale of intoxicating liquor on City owned premises located at 5394 Edgewood Drive and 8290 Coral Sea Street in addition to premises the licensee 41) owns or permanently occupies. The license may provide that the licensee may contract for intoxicating Iiquor catering services with the holder of an on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by the City or any adjacent municipality or the holder of a caterers permit issued by the Commissioner of Public Safety. Licenses under this subdivision are not valid unless first approved by the Commissioner of Public Safety or unless the licensee contracts for intoxicating liquor catering services with the holder of a state caterer's permit issued by the Commissioner of Public Safety. This license shall be required notwithstanding the requirement of any permit by the state. (Ord. 591, 10-29-96) Subd. 7. Temporary Intoxicating Liquor Banquet. In addition to any permit which may be required by the state, an intoxicating liquor banquet license may be issued only to the holder of an on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued under subdivision 1 of this Chapter or to the holder of an on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by an adjacent City. Such license will permit the licensee to dispense intoxicating liquor at any convention,banquet, conference, meeting or social event conducted on the premises located at 5394 Edgewood Drive and 8290 Coral Sea Street owned by the City of Mounds View. The licensee must be engaged to dispense intoxicating liquor at any event held by a person or organization permitted to use the City owned premises located at 5394 Edgewood Drive and 8290 Coral Sea Street and may dispense intoxicating liquor only to persons attending the event. The licensee may not dispense or sell intoxicating liquor to any person attending or participating in an amateur athletic event held on the City owned premises located at 5394 • Edgewood Drive and 8290 Coral Sea Street. (Ord. 591, 10-29-96) See also subdivision 503.03(1)b of this Title for sale of malt liquor. City of Mounds View 502.13 502.15 • (4) Scenes wherein artificial devices or inanimate objects are employed to depict or drawings are employed to portray any of the prohibited activities described above. (5) To permit any employee or person under contract to perform on the premises or to dance on any table, bar or other elevated platform, except on a duly designated stage designed exclusively for the entertainment of patrons of the premises, said stage to be located at least three feet (3') from any patron. Subd. 10. Sale or Consumption in Public or on Public Land or Highways: No liquor shall be sold or consumed in any public place not holding an on-sale or off-sale license. No liquor shall be sold or consumed on a public highway, in an automobile or on public land. (1988 Code §100.10) 502.14: MINORS: Subd. 1. Employment of Minors: No minor shall be employed in any rooms constituting the place in which intoxicating liquors are sold at retail on-sale. (1988 Code §100.09) Subd. 2. Purchase of Liquor, Misrepresentation of Age: No minor shall misrepresent their age • for the purpose of obtaining liquor nor shall the minor enter any premises licensed under this Chapter in order to procure such beverages or to consume or purchase or attempt to purchase or have others purchase for the minor such beverages on licensed premises. • Subd. 3. Inducing Minors to Purchase Liquor. No person shall induce a minor to purchase or procure liquor. Subd. 4. Procuring Liquor for Minors: No person shall give to, procure or purchase liquor for any minor or any other person to whom the sale of intoxicating liquors is forbidden by law'. (1988 Code §100.10) 502.15: ZONING RESTRICTIONS: No license shall be issued for premises located within the areas restricted against commercial use by Title 1100 of this Code. No license shall be issued for premises or places in which the sale or use thereof has been prohibited by the Liquor Act2. (1988 Code §100.11) • M.S.A. §340A.503. 2 M.S.A. §340A.412, subdivision 4. City of Mounds View 502.04 502.05 (Rev. 10/96) • c. No license shall begranted for anypremises within five hundred feet (500') of the property line of any school or church located in Mounds View except that the five hundred feet (500') restriction shall not apply and a license may be granted for any licensed premises that receives at least sixty percent (60%) of its annual gross sales revenue from the sale of food. The licensee must provide evidence to the City on an annual basis as part of the license renewal process that the licensee has complied with the minimum sixty percent (60%) food sales requirement of this Section. Failure to comply with the minimum sixty percent (60%) food sales requirement of this Section shall be cause for suspension, revocation or denial of renewal of this license. (Ord. 582, 5-28-96) d. No license shall be issued for any premises owned by a person to whom a license may not be granted under this Chapter or an owner who is a minor, alien or a person who has been convicted of a crime other than a violation of Minnesota Statutes 340.07 to 340.40. e. No license shall be granted for any place, except an exclusive liquor store, for which a license of another class has been granted under this Chapter. (1988 Code §100.07) 502.05: APPLICATION FOR LICENSE: Subd. 1. Contents of Application: a. Application: Every application for a license to sell liquor shall be verified and filed with the Clerk-Administrator. It shall state the name of the applicant, applicant's age, representations as to applicant's character, references as may be required, whether the application is for on-sale or off-sale, the business in connection with which the proposed license will operate, its location, whether the applicant is owner and operator of the business, how long applicant has been or is operating a similar business at that place, whether applicant has been or is operating a similar business at some other location (if so, the name of the establishment) and such other information as the Council may require, from time to time. b. Form: In addition to containing such information, each application for a license shall be in the form prescribed by the Commissioner of Public Safety. c. False Statements: No person shall make a false statement in an application. Subd. 2. Floor Plan: The application shall provide a floor plan of the interior of all structures. Such plan shall show the dimensions and the intended arrangement and use of all interior space. (1988 Code §100.03) • City of Mounds View 503.03 503.04 (Rev. 10/96) 110 Subd. 3. Temporary Non-Intoxicating Liquor Special Events License. A temporary special event non-intoxicating liquor license may be issued for the retail sale of non-intoxicating malt liquor for consumption on City owned premises located at 5394 Edgewood Drive and 8290 Coral Sea Street and during the time of the special event. A special event license may be issued to a club, or charitable, religious or other non-profit organization which has been in existence for at lease three (3) years, or to an organization contributing all of the profits of the sale of non-intoxicating malt liquor to a charity, or to any business holding an on-sale license to sell non-intoxicating malt liquor issued by the City or by an adjacent City. The license shall specify the date, time and place and premises of the special event. A special event non-intoxicating license is not transferable. (Ord. 591, 10-29-96) 503.04: ELIGIBILITY FOR LICENSE: Subd. 1. Persons Ineligible for License; Exceptions: No license shall be granted to any person: a. Who is a minor. 111 b. Who has been convicted of a felony or of violating the National Prohibition Act or any law of this State or local ordinance relating to the manufacture or transportation of intoxicating liquors'. c. Who is a manufacturer of beer or who is interested in the control of any place where • beer is manufactured. d. Who is an alien or a nonresident of Mounds View unless otherwise directed by the Council. e. Who is not of good moral character. f. Who is or, during the period of this license, becomes a holder of a Federal retail liquor dealer's special tax stamp for the sale of intoxicating liquor at any place unless there has • also been issued to that person a local license to sell intoxicating liquor at such place. g. Who is not the proprietor of the establishment for which the license is issued. (1988 Code §101.06) I M.S.A. §340A.101 et seq. City of Mounds View 502.01 502.03 • b. FOOD: A menu consisting of not less than three (3) separate and distinct entrees, complete with vegetable, salad, rolls or bread and selection of beverages. c. MINOR: Any person who has not reached the age of nineteen (19) as of their last birthday. d. MUNICIPALITY: The City of Mounds View. e. PREMISES: All buildings and structures, as well as all parking lots, driveways, landscaped areas, steps, passageways and vestibules, located outside of said building or structure. • f. PUBLIC AREA: All areas inside the exterior walls of a restaurant, nightclub or other establishment which is open to the general public for the sale, service or consumption of food or liquor. (1988 Code §100.01) 502.02: LICENSE REQUIRED: No person, except wholesalers or manufacturers to the extent authorized under State license', shall directly or indirectly deal in, sell or keep for sale 0 any intoxicating liquor without first having received a license to do so as provided in this ' Chapter. Licenses shall be of three(3)kinds: "on-sale, "club" and "on-sale wine" licenses. (1988 Code §100.02) 502.03: LICENSE CLASSIFICATIONS: Subd. 1. On-Sale Licenses: On-sale licenses may be issued for the sale of intoxicating liquors in hotels, clubs, restaurants and establishments for the sale of on-sale liquors exclusively within the number authorized by this Chapter. In addition, an on-sale license may be issued, if approved by the Commissioner of Public Safety, to a bona fide club which has been in existence for fifteen(15) years or more or to a Congressionally charged veterans' organization which has been in existence for ten (10) years. Such a club or veterans' organization shall be incorporated in order to be eligible to apply for a license, and the . license issued shall be for the sale of intoxicating liquors to members and bona fide guests only. The Municipality may issue the amount of licenses as authorized in Minnesota Statutes 340.11, subdivision 5A. Subd. 2. Off-Sale Licenses: An off-sale license shall be issued only to a proprietor of a drugstore or an exclusive liquor store, the number of which to be determined by the Council. III 1 M.S.A. §340A.301 et seq. City of Mounds Yiew Isar-20-98 04:58pm From-KENNEDY & GRAVEN 6123379310 T-456 P.05/08 F-425 __ • 444s� S a <o a ° ,g ; 41, a.r 18� 3 1 411_4 1..g..g 1 1 _ / '� ar ii 8 � �,t3 f ,8aa �}1p}. . iz v 3 Li o 2 � is iku tea, S .;= I h s as '�4 - fil I ".. 0 Ta. m:. •`8 .°.+, .. c'a. .,,7.ago. iZ 1 piI1 la. hip GnJIv •In a � 3 a �, T � Lb- 30 - gse ya. _ € la Q,z . titlilipiThfigri.114ig e. !ip:m h I 5, hi e::-,..p.. 111 tit Nil ig ! ! JIJzdqqhJiii 8. dir-.Alp_ C a r i s a 8 . 0ripg NA 'PAIR :Alp -, [1 : 11 - 1 ua Er ‘ 011:44 -0 - --i .. 031,119it:• il igia ga-va-- .g .ei, . 1 a . ..73- 41 48/41-11.1f7Iniiiii 1 A I O 1�� 3 T � � V � � .t � �4i r. vV, Iii illihAggl2a i b ',1 -`47,'Z'a 3g s ,zs' dg 8 - •3 - 8c8 3' t� [yp� w f � � j 11 .� 13 �[IfiJiI1il � AOyaa u �' I c.Q.. a D t 3 <• "g"• v, �7 il 4 -s ' el t +9 �aa o g,ti3 1. tup' Tie tg Qhs I 1LI stisa si•A- . X 4.18 .1 5 � h 8 8' �¢y gg l ^Q y fVz � �Oel *14a � � �� � "Z-41202 ixt;� O . O . •�8p� "�� LOQ ��� IL.. . 3a � r „Agz ate. b 5 1445.152 i o a. S Al3 aa,o .. `m . `;"0 ig 13y E14•E Heirg14 % o i_ii 7.Lzal i.i.,11 pill a;31 .111 ill >. -,1.§,f - 1, __. ; 41, .5 .?. .t til iii 1=At 1PitI!II dit 1ItiJ1i1j 9sali r. •w Mililt ll• 1 1 xt rs Iirmr.- —p tia:43Z1-2. 4tans.St:41 ,1 a ' a� � ` ' 13 � lia1 ea ea iii.:... Ne,... ` .“00 :- C � � g ° 111= 43g r sv 8 a' 11.,a. 42w 4 8 imp 'ice 8 � a o0 91 < ”" a. ° _a -1 o �jj z ° a c g -i uiIb g.,-0c otti1!iJ!! • i . iga-� Fa 93i50541. 1 §12 tei Itrifiztelsa- iliiIII1ItJIi4ijit a8 < 88a • 5 -, 15 a4 4 ' g ' if � 9 B= s - s.4Pli" < • /' 1411;21 - 81 16.,15151a 23..ii5j'aillA ' a3 �. 7. wh o ' a g , e1 .. ,.Iilis ao haIan .5 aIli] I' a. hh • Mar-20-98 05:00pm From-KENNEDY A GRAVEN 6123379310 T-456 P.07/08 F-425 le C o is Q {� }. 'SaH� 3 _ o �Q7o a �_ a w O y '4 ,1 1 $ .x y G i IS i F • ..�$ 9 v y 1 op s .1 - as. � q .,„J , R a lig . i "F= - " F 0. .., oa -az_ ,,, .. 2 11 1 § E:8 jr ; 1 . li i Ili 11 ill3 ; 1 ; 1 J ,-1 i'! IP! 37 .!, a 1 4 la # f.2e 413 1.--• 1 i .:-..--. 'a V 5 Ix, elle r� 4i a' Is .g8 -- .. va4 e ; $ $ tit i . s . s o" p .9Ax' 1z �'�.� � A' O .� ,7i C1141 4 at. 34��aaazzz10Q —4 1111 1f!lltEH1fihI ., �+ g �qq� �a a, I al i i - F� Boz:�` a3_ .s ego $ $ O a '' G4 F. .. 4 = = 0 -a - litr s irn211411 p _ as $ a t o'$ $ raoe . ...9 G A1 . 1 - Za $ Q ". ,� or2 g a-42rra ; •3 '5 a R-0.4 -3 i fp 4.1 1.1 IA..., rg3t -it ga ID] c 4°.. 1 ecie,*Z gt m -47,- 171— a� . §$A :3 u a ..4 !Iiji!!Jfl' Pi1I � 8i � DO m � 2 .-, ;^ I � ,. _ pry v ill D .. .g,Vii �.. CEJ 1-. ? ^' Q 4 IA ° Ii I P11 4JJI ►- :is ,, 11011 cN I' vII .1 v o 9—� 3333 G �C 42.11. •g ss .?� 41 ' Lp,ws� G � a y� � o a ¢ _ it, 3 C ;1a.1 - V y V ' - 4.: -. i a$ �a - 3i 1 li$ � 4.'11'1 9 hill ! o : 17.Q i a i ! Ug lqii _ t 1 ;11 # 1 ' I441 i 1' lis � �i ,. gg �.� g � ,. � ,11 � � , s� aN 9 g .1§ 5.11111111 41 iall 2514 v2'-E4a p ; i ; ',-2- � � e �� 4118 .§ a � is . ' f a .a t� was 1 z .4= g 141.1 11 ii ."' 4. 4� ,yin _ 1 2 2.. a I z i t ze ;174 ui;Iii xox h7"6 Si - 1.!: S °Qe�aQ q�" � — sem ^ 'jitJb ` NS — .4a 4...3 3i, G ,,; $ .a :; i:. 42�N ►N > 'CZ .A N p.Q'u u 4 ury sii ivg �� $ . �_ � .. ,� •� 000$ c�'�i 8 w A W. 3'+ 8 3.3 .5 Pu1ii _lip, S2. 2 1 . _ - ` Northwest Youth & Family Services Lij, 3490 Lexington Avenue North • Shoreview, MN 55126 • (612) 486-3808 • FAX (612) 486-3858 u arch 19, 1998 TO: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator City of Mounds View FROM: Kay Andrews, Executive Director Northwest Youth & Family Services SUBJECT: The Contract After a year of many hours of discussion, various drafts and proposals, I think we have a Contract. As I hope you understand, this Contract will replace the present Joint Powers Agreement. The same Contract is being used by all cities, therefore preserving the sense of a collective effort to insure the provision of social services in the northwest suburbs of Ramsey County. This version has been approved by the Roseville City Council and will be approved by our Board at their April 9, 1998 meeting. I do not anticipate any problem arising around its approval. This leaves the next step up to you and your Council. They will need to examine the Contract, discuss it and hopefully agree to it. I would encourage you to take action on this . as soon as reasonable so we can all put this matter to rest. After positive action has occurred, pleased execute the appropriate signatures and return it to me. I will than get the Contract signed here and return one original to you. You can expect to receive quarterly reports as indicated in the Contract. The NYFS board is presently working on a by law revision. When that is completed I will send to you the other materials indicated in the Contract. If you have any questions about any of this, please give me a call. I will however be on vacation until April 6. If you need assistance while I am gone please ask for David Evertz. One housekeeping matter - if you paid your city allotment only for the first quarter, please remit the remainder. Again, thanks for all the time and cooperation you have given to making this transition become a reality. I do believe this Contract allows us to move smoothly into the future and continue our collaborative relationship with you. Thank you. Sincerely, III Kay Andrews, LICSW 2. Establish a fair and open bidding/request for proposal (RFP) process to contract, manage or provide such services and • programs which are not directly provided by NYFS staff. D. Funding. 1. In addition to the participating municipalities share of the Annual budget, funds for the operation of NYFS will be raised By NYFS endeavoring to secure user fees, grants and appropriations from private organizations, the State of Minnesota, Federal and County agencies, and other legal and appropriate sources. 2. The City shall pay annually to NYFS an amount equal to $1.20 per capita ("Per Capita Payment") based upon City's population in Ramsey County. The City's population shall be determined by using the most recent Metropolitan Council population data. the Per Capita Payment may be adjusted annually for inflation/ deflation using the Implicit Price Deflation index with 1997 as the base year. Such adjustment shall not exceed plus or minus 5% in any year. Any adjustment in the Per Capita Payment beyond those indicated by reference to the Implicit Price Deflation index shall require approval of each of the participating municipalities. 3. Amounts payable by the City shall be paid to NYFS on or before January 30, of each year to cover the City's share for that year. E. Board of Directors. This Agreement is contingent upon the City having a designated seat on the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall be limited to not more than 20 Board members. F. Further Obligations of the NYFS. In addition to the obligations set forth elsewhere in this Agreement, this Agreement is further contingent upon NYFS doing the following: 1. The Bylaws of NYFS shall be amended to add provisions requiring an open process for contracting services as provided for in paragraph C.2., above, and prohibiting NYFS from supporting or opposing individual candidates for election to public office in any of the participating municipalities; and adding the requirement that IRS 501.C3 status be maintained. 2. On or before June 30, of any year NYFS shall submit a written report to the City including an Annual Report, the audited financial statement, a program specific summary of services provided to the municipality, and the proposed city budgeted • amount for the subsequent year; in addition, 30 days from the end of each calendar quarter, NYFS shall submit a written report to the participating municipality. (B) Deviation from the Mission. • If the City Council determines that NYFS has materially deviated from its mission (See II. Recitals, A.), the City Council may ask the NYFS Board of Directors to consider dissolving the agency and liquidating the assets. The Board will do one of the following: 1. Consider the request and by a majority vote deny it. 2. Consider the request and by a majority vote agree to modify the programs to be consistent with the mission. 3. Consider the request and by a majority vote agree with the request and move to dissolve the agency and liquidate the assets. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on this date set forth below. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW •By. Mayor Its: Clerk/Manager Dated: NORTHWEST YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES By: Executive Director Its: Chairman of Board of Directors Dated: • AGREEMENT 411 I PARTIES. This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of Mounds View Minnesota ("City") and Northwest Youth and Family Services ("NYFS"). II. RECITALS. A. NYFS is a non-profit social service agency whose mission is to meet the unmet developmental needs of at-risk youth and families within their community environment with emphasis on providing services through collaboration and coordination with existing community resources. These services are available to youth and families residing in the northwest suburbs of Ramsey County, including, but not limited to, the municipalities which are signatory to agreements which are identical to this Agreement ("participating municipalities") and students and families from Independent School Districts 621, 623 and 282. B. Through this Agreement the City intends to contract with NYFS to provide such services to its residents and to act as a sponsor of NYFS by providing financial support, a method to establish appropriate services to beprovided and policy guidance for its activities. C. This Agreement shall be used as the form agreement between NYFS and each of the participating municipalities. This Agreement replaces a Joint Powers Agreement and is intended to continue the spirit of cooperation and collaboration in the provision of social services between the City and NYFS. III. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. In consideration of the mutual understandings of this Agreement, the parties hereby agree as follows: A. Prior Agreements Cancelled. By execution of this Agreement any prior agreements and amendments thereto between the parties are hereby cancelled. B. Services Provided. NYFS shall provide the City and its residents with youth and family counseling and programs set forth in the Addendum Attached hereto. C. Principles of Services and Program Establishment and Operations. • On a yearly basis and prior to submission of its annual budget, as provided for hereafter, NYFS shall: 1. Report regarding proposed changes in services and programs to the City; and 3. Periodically advising the City of services available through NYFS To the City's residents: 4. Establishing a sliding scale for counseling services available through NYFS to the City's residents and periodically advising the City of such fees: 5. Providing other reasonable information requested by the City; 6. Purchasing a policy of liability insurance in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00, naming the City as an additional insured and providing a copy of the insurance certificate evidencing such policy to the City, annually; 7. Provide the City with a copy of its Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, Amendments thereto, and the IRS tax exempt status letter, 6. NYFS shall defend and indemnify the City from any and all claims or causes of actions brought against the City of any matter arising out of this Agreement or the services provided pursuant to this Agreement; and, 7. Without the written approval of the City, NYFS will not enter into any agreement with any other city which differs from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. G. Term. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for an indefinite term unless any party gives the other party at least 6 months written notice of its intent to cancel this Agreement effective December 31, of the year in which the notice is made. H. (A) Distribution of Assets Upon Dissolution. If NYFS ceases to operate, the Board of Directors will do one of the following: 1. Give the assets to one or more non-profit agencies providing similar social services in the northern suburbs of Ramsey County; or, 2. Form a new Foundation to fund appropriate social service programming in the northern suburbs of Ramsey County. The final Distribution of Assets Plan must be approved by the Ramsey • County District Court. AGREEMENT • I PARTIES. This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of Mounds View Minnesota ("City") and Northwest Youth and Family Services ("NYFS"). II. RECITALS. A. NYFS is a non-profit social service agency whose mission is to meet the unmet developmental needs of at-risk youth and families within their community environment with emphasis on providing services through collaboration and coordination with existing community resources. These services are available to youth and families residing in the northwest suburbs of Ramsey County, including, but not limited to, the municipalities which are signatory to agreements which are identical to this Agreement ("participating municipalities") and students and families from Independent School Districts 621, 623 and 282. B. Through this Agreement the City intends to contract with NYFS to provide such services to its residents and to act as a sponsor of NYFS by providing financial support, a method to establish appropriate services to 410 be provided and policy guidance for its activities. C. This Agreement shall be used as the form agreement between NYFS and each of the participating municipalities. This Agreement replaces a Joint Powers Agreement and is intended to continue the spirit of cooperation and collaboration in the provision of social services between the City and NYFS. III. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. In consideration of the mutual understandings of this Agreement, the parties hereby agree as follows: A. Prior Agreements Cancelled. By execution of this Agreement any prior agreements and amendments thereto between the parties are hereby cancelled. B. Services Provided. NYFS shall provide the City and its residents with youth and family counseling and programs set forth in the Addendum Attached hereto. C. Principles of Services and Program Establishment and Operations. • On a yearly basis and prior to submission of its annual budget, as provided for hereafter, NYFS shall: 1. Report regarding proposed changes in services and programs to the City; and 3. Periodically advising the City of services available through NYFS To the City's residents: 4. Establishing a sliding scale for counseling services available through NYFS to the City's residents and periodically advising the City of such fees: 5. Providing other reasonable information requested by the City; 6. Purchasing a policy of liability insurance in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00, naming the City as an additional insured and providing a copy of the insurance certificate evidencing such policy to the City, annually; 7. Provide the City with a copy of its Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, Amendments thereto, and the IRS tax exempt status letter; 6. NYFS shall defend and indemnify the City from any and all claims or causes of actions brought against the City of any matter arising out of this Agreement or the services provided pursuant to this Agreement; and, 7. Without the written approval of the City, NYFS will not enter into any agreement with any other city which differs from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. G. Term. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for an • indefinite term unless any party gives the other party at least 6 months written notice of its intent to cancel this Agreement effective December 31, of the year in which the notice is made. H. (A) Distribution of Assets Upon Dissolution. If NYFS ceases to operate, the Board of Directors will do one of the following: 1. Give the assets to one or more non-profit agencies providing similar social services in the northern suburbs of Ramsey County; or, 2. Form a new Foundation to fund appropriate social service programming in the northern suburbs of Ramsey County. The final Distribution of Assets Plan must be approved by the Ramsey • County District Court. * 13 • INTER MEMO , OF F ICE To: Chuck Whiting From: Rick Jopke Subject: Proposed Development on Shoreview University of Minnesota Site Date: March 31, 1998 On Friday March 27,1998 I attended a meeting at the City of Shoreview concerning the future development of the University of Minnesota site. Also in attendance were representatives from Blaine, Arden Hills, Ramsey County, and Anoka County. The site is 228 acres in area and is located on the east side of 35W between County Road I and County Road J. Twenty three acres of the development site is currently owned and used by MnDot. The site is being acquired by the Wispark Corporation for future development. Two development alternatives are being studied. One alternative would be a business park with approximately 2 million square feet of space. the other alternative would be a mixed use iidevelopment (see attached site plan) which would include 1.1 million square feet of business park uses, a 204,000 square foot office park, 59,000 square feet of retail uses and 272 units of townhomes/villas/garden apartments developed by Rottlund Homes. A new north south road from County Road Ito County Road J would be constructed as a part of the development. The roadway would line up with Naples Street on the north and the County Road I/east35W entrance/exit ramps on the south. The roadway would have to go through wetlands associated with Rice Creek so there are a number of significant wetland and environmental issues which would have to be overcome. An Environmental Impact Statement is being completed for the project It is anticipated that infrasructure improvements coul occur in the summer of 1999 with development to follow. A traffic study has been completed which indicates that the business park alternative would generate approximately 30,000 cars a day and the mixed use project would generate approximately 28,000 cars a day. A portion of that study is attached. The City will also be getting a copy of the full traffic study to help better understand the traffic impact on Mounds View. According to the traffic study County Road I and County Road J are not currently designed to handle the proposed traffic volumes. The existing roads could only handle about a third of the development. Additional signals, thru lanes,and turn lanes would be necessary on both roads and a new bridge over 35W would be necessary on County Road J. Discussion occurred concerning the impact of development of the arsenal site in Arden Hills on County Road I. A separate traffic study is being completed for that development. Future meetings will be held to coordinate the two 0 studies.Representatives from Shoreview have asked for support from surrounding communities to bring about the construction of the new bridge on County Road J. „. •.• •�• !,i / _•......e'.��.+..�:�...e o ...l I is i :�' it a�/ a fl p O a m n *� '.',• Ptec -zzo' £ I ?1JJ r� tN'� ' o0i 1 i n © 0 Geo 0 r a s '• if O cg oak, v e l4►.two• /♦ y 7 ' k, , / •P i +1 0 1 r ~ ° •, • .� • $ ,, c1111 c jj • imeg°ot �> o 1101 �yr•e .i d r. O a • . �� ` �'iI. 0 ., frel a. a 0 u r a 1� �_ = / so00 �D a• Jli a�� y'Fy2 ; --/- �'_': ��.►.ajt. ) // v��rit? a o• L n 440 _< . .-, • •��-�� x'ow�... see '';Y. l� \ `�J • R A ,p.. . -vi a.„, _ 0. TI \ m rII c2 . ..-ei p N a 0 fT1 /�S .v o�II Qo9A�aeb.' =w I Cla 4, r:•1:11.1....- eel. -mi ? ►'�it o•.: �I/ n G7 Q 0 • �� e:e e e•o •• e.... 4• L! e Me •l,a ` Vii. O i. r ‘4. • .� p •'.'t.•a mo j :• IIg R7 e. • C. p Z fl .: • , • .v! . . p • �^ ... lc ../.01::%1../.01::%1• o.� i. 0 • ee• .• . O...nre 1 ....% D. • i ( J+ Z y • n • • t.) o • Xc t. 1,1 cil Q e«e.w J. Cq_�p'•Me.w •! .. aq S otb 4,,, . •e0� 0.0 - • , ° o p” -------- _ or� 96 �IVMHJIH \\, r 1 § 7 0 .. Fill iti-"N \ \ ‹.)-tiNIR .1111Allitenr . \ ,4_7 �LpD .; O 'J y� . V �- •\` \>„\\:17,-A\ CEm2 Amo 2 1 rm 4k r r+-- m 1, ill001,. ,' ff.) N,_ , r,...t gg I 1/4-2X0) ' 714L,/' 1 . 1. '\ � / l7 co col r 1 I t*, 1 r� ;mz Z r 4 4,c1 41 E —I ..)illihi m 1 II OW/ 77J -r- ,.--, ; III x,01 1 ) ro ; 0 El _ 0 \ 2. g I , rUAlr ,= K D = z / l- o —H \ _ ' T./1 '::1-11;11. Ia mo1 .X �A . 4 i' • :• nC/ \ >;2 :� . ..I ^ 0) L1.) J5iic• ' z —I ;1:1 am "O > , Z • myO 9 _ • yg • } �1 .. # Ii 90! � 00gn_ _ � —� � I o CO D I ONION I �•o• v' � O C =IA - -' < -' r, - - - - - - uNnoO REGIONAL TRAFFIC MODEL • Forecast Conditions In order to develop traffic forecasts for the study area, it was assumed that the TCAAP site and the Highway 10/96 Triangle would be redeveloped. Input from City staff and a review of the traffic study completed for the TCAAP site by Short Elliot and Hendrickson, Inc. was considered in developing anticipated trip generation for the TCAAP and Highway 96/10 sites. The model assumes a total of 102,000 trips would be generated from the sites daily. During the PM peak hour, approximately 11,000 trips would be generated from the sites. These trips were distributed and assigned to the surrounding road network based on the distribution from the Twin Cities Regional Travel Model. The site-generated traffic was added to the existing ADT counts to develop the traffic forecasts. Forecasts were developed for three scenarios with each scenario having different road network access assumptions. The three scenarios are described below. Future Road Network Overview In order to adequately model the key intersections in the study area,BRW developed a concept arterial roadway network which is assumed to be in place at the time of full redevelopment of the TCAAP site and the Highway 10/96 Triangle. The concept roadway network includes the "TCAAP Road"within the TCAAP site beginning at Hamline Avenue and running west parallel to Highway 96 and curving north to parallel Highway 10 and Interstate 35W and terminating at County Road I. TCAAP Road includes major intersections with Hamline Avenue, Snelling Avenue (extended to north), County Road H2 (extended to east) and Gateway Boulevard. The model assumes that Gateway Boulevard would be extended across Highway 96 at the time of redevelopment of the Highway 10/96 Triangle and would gradually curve northeastward crossing Highway 10 and intersecting with TCAAP Road. The Average Daily Traffic on arterial road segments in the study area was calculated for three future scenarios of varying access. In addition, the function of three main intersections in the study area was analyzed. The three intersections included are the Highway 10/Gateway Boulevard intersection, Highway 96/Highway 10 intersection, and the Highway 96/Gateway Boulevard intersection. For the purposes of the study, all intersections were modeled as at-grade intersections to determine whether or not they could function in that capacity (unless no access is assumed). Separated grade interchanges can be assumed to perform more efficiently than the at- grade intersections. Exhibit 3 illustrates the geometry of the future road network utilized in the traffic model and provides summaries of ADT volumes anticipated on various segments in the study area. Tables 1 and 2 summarize turning movements and intersection function for the three intersections studied in scenarios 1, 2 and 3. Existing Condition: The 1996 average daily traffic (ADT) for existing arterial roadways in the study area was input into the model to create a baseline condition. PM Peak Hour turning movements were also input for three key intersections. The level of service at the three existing 5 intersections is summarized below. • The Highway 96/Highway 10 intersection under existing conditions functions at a Level Of Service F during the PM Peak Hour. Separate analysis of the Highway 96/Gateway Boulevard intersection indicates that the intersection functions at an acceptable level of service today,however the intersection will require a signal in the near future to accommodate the development of the Gateway Business Park. The existing accesses along Highway 10 north of Highway 96 currently do not function as a single intersection and therefore were not evaluated in the existing condition. FORECAST SCENARIOS Scenario 1: At-Grade Intersections at Highway 10 & Highway 96; Gateway Boulevard & Highway 96; Gateway Boulevard & Highway 10 Traffic Movement/Access Provided This scenario would maintain full access in all directions for traffic on Highway 96 as well as • traffic entering the City on Trunk Highway 10. Access to the redeveloped TCAAP site and the redeveloped Highway 10/96 Triangle would be through Hamline Avenue, Snelling Avenue, Gateway Boulevard, County Road H2 and County Road I. All future scenarios assume that one at grade intersection(or crossing)would replace the multiple existing entrances onto TH 10 north of Highway 96. The proposed intersection of TH 10 and Highway 96 would include dual left-turn lanes on the southbound TH 10 approach to accommodate 336 peak hour left turns. Single left turn lanes would be provided on all other legs. Free right turn lanes would be provided for TH 10 traffic onto Highway 96 from both north and south approaches. Dual left turn lanes would be required for eastbound Highway 96 to northbound Gateway Boulevard to accommodate 443 peak hour left turns. The analysis indicates a high number of right turn movements for southbound Gateway Boulevard to westbound Highway 96 which may require free right turn access or multiple turn lanes. Dual left turn lanes would be required for southbound Highway 10 to eastbound Gateway Boulevard to accommodate 790 peak hour left turns. Old Highway 10 would be realigned to run parallel between Highway 96 and Round Lake connecting to Gateway Boulevard west of Round Lake. The relocation of the Old Highway 10 access is necessary to provide the minimum desirable separation between full access intersections along Highway 96. This scenario requires that the alignment of Highway 96 be shifted north from its current location in order to accommodate the frontage road without any additional impacts to Round Lake. • 6 Scenario 1 would provide a high level of access for Arden Hills residents and businesses. It • should be pointed out that the quality of the access would be extremely low during peak periods. Calculated PM peak hour levels of service are summarized below for the three main intersections: a. Highway 96/Highway 10 Intersection: LOS =F* b. Gateway Boulevard/Highway 10 Intersection: LOS=F* c. Gateway Boulevard/Highway 96 Intersection: LOS= C *In order to improve the Peak Hour LOS on Highway 10, a six-lane highway would be needed. Scenario 2: At-Grade Intersections at Gateway Boulevard & Highway 96; Gateway Boulevard & Highway 10 No Access between Highway 96 & Highway 10 Traffic Movement/Access Provided This scenario would provide reasonable access for traffic on Highway 96 although the large volume of traffic headed to north Interstate 35W or future Highway 610 (and reverse traffic) will need to access Interstate 35W at the new Highway 96/I 35W interchange west of Round Lake. An alternative route would require traveling through the TCAAP site and entering Highway 10 • at the proposed intersection of Gateway Boulevard. Access to the redeveloped TCAAP site and the redeveloped Highway 10/96 Triangle would be through Hamline Avenue, Snelling Avenue, Gateway Boulevard, County Road H2 and County Road I identical to Scenario 1. The proposed intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Highway 96 would include dual left-turn lanes on the eastbound Highway 96 approach to accommodate 443 peak hour left turns. The analysis indicates a high number of right turn movements for southbound Gateway Boulevard to westbound Highway 96 which may require free right turn access or multiple turn lanes. The proposed intersection of Highway 10 and Gateway Boulevard would include dual left-turn lanes on the southbound Highway 10 approach to accommodate 790 peak hour left turns. Single left and right turn lanes would be provided on all other legs of these two intersections. Old Highway 10 would intersect with Highway 96 in approximately the same area as today since spacing conflicts between the Highway 96/Highway 10 intersection would not exist. Consequently this scenario would allow Highway 96 to remain in its current alignment between Highway 10 and Interstate 35W. Scenario 2 would provide an adequate however slightly lower range of access for Arden Hills residents and businesses than that provided in Scenario 1. It should be pointed out that during peak times the quality of the access would be significantly better at the two functioning intersections than in Scenario 1. Calculated PM peak hour levels of service are summarized below for the two main intersections: • 7 a. Gateway Boulevard/Highway 10 Intersection: LOS=F • b. Gateway Boulevard/Highway 96 Intersection: LOS =C Scenario 3: At-Grade Intersections at Gateway Boulevard & Highway 96; No Access between Highway 96 & Highway 10 Gateway Boulevard & Highway 10 Traffic Movement/Access Provided This scenario would provide the same level of access for traffic on Highway 96 as Scenario 2 however the access between Gateway Boulevard and Highway 10 would be removed in this scenario. The removal of the Highway 10/Gateway Boulevard intersection pushes large amounts of traffic generated from the redeveloped TCAAP site onto Hamline Avenue, Gateway Boulevard and County Road H2 for access to the freeway system. Access to the redeveloped TCAAP site and the redeveloped Highway 10/96 Triangle would be through Hamline Avenue, Snelling Avenue, Gateway Boulevard, County Road H2 and County Road I . Highway 10 would not function as a feeder to the TCAAP site under this scenario and only through traffic between I 35W and I 694 would be served by Highway 10 under Scenario 3. The proposed intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Highway 96 would include dual left-turn lanes on the eastbound Highway 96 approach to accommodate 460 peak hour left turns. The analysis indicates a high number of right turn movements for southbound Gateway Boulevard to • westbound Highway 96 which may require free right turn access or multiple turn lanes. Single left and right turn lanes would be provided on the other legs of the intersection. This scenario would also allow Highway 96 to remain in its current alignment between Highway 10 and Interstate 35W since no access would be provided at Highway 10. Scenario 3 would provide the least range of access for Arden Hills residents and businesses of the three scenarios considered. In addition, the quality of the access during peak periods at the one functioning intersection would be less than its function in Scenario 2. Calculated PM Peak Hour levels of service are summarized below for the one intersection: a. . Gateway Boulevard/Highway 96 Intersection: LOS=D SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC MODEL RESULTS * Highway 96/Highway 10 intersection will operate at LOS F unless grade separated or Highway 10 is increased to six through lanes in width. If Highway 96 and Highway 10 are grade separated with no access, there are properties in the Highway 96/10 Triangle which would not have acceptable access to points south and west via Interstate 35W. • 8 • . •'. • .1 e ,, :ar..A,Y .,._. 'orooee .°.e e ....eq\ ♦ • aoe1aI ,i,....,, °e• p) : vI ' � F . t.. M / i/�'.•:- Bit 9 • I • 7' _1.-- , (4( ,_,j Q b o •r a ° Jr ' .5]-;, tai !_I lkt; °%' •18 ..:.a S ljl o 1.71-..-• , • 8 1 a t �"O -��' •/ \UVJ ./ o m X x x X J�� d a —I —I —I 1::::10 C:I '\:' "`• r A Illit r ro. . '4,,A ) zz— m0- C-' CO 0 r • IJ` 1 �4gi-. 3 t0 tC- CO r CO c0 O a by �%C ti l.((( ( 4,� ;+,a D D rn r D rn r: rn a� i a J "ti��-R` �'S4 -.-`.: .e.• i nnD DnD DD D a n CMJ �C� °' - Q n Q Ft \��j I N N-, 0&•--I C7 2 I aw r-., • tt C .tee _\"\� = -I )... rir„i)- tiO I __I__I > c �� \ �f ` °' i e° vee D � 0 •��N -1�N -1N '� \\� 71 d cOm =cOm m "' �'o ti'0 °'S,'"a'8o g R o\m -•gym m \\' ��sg noa 4•s'gm •�,ep5 G72� _� \,-mj0. cc \ NN 52 5- o . oy f m��' mom �m Q ° I :::;9: 'a: : '�'- %.•0 0 = I 73 - 7 Z7) o r i..e-,. IT Qo „Leif oar Z 7-7: I CO D D D ° 1j i°� ODig p f_ a• O •,.+ oz o Qom•, x c� C •*t r -,� X �l =• •a Or�ie•..ii rz^c .s O r Q Q _ Z ri�' . a . .0 .•••••••4: "'�-�..,..e. > „/.� ► - • • D D . , 1 _ •a-� '.e O a 1/:,;88N.,,,,,,, \:0 j,' NN(Ot„i` ; 1 ONpV D<D< 4 ' ! -�• 5000 'M• a.I I OOONDm �' + O,� �� , 0000f ___ 000Se.r ` _rn a 000# e\ m • e F� •� a 0...... 1 oovl. m__•'O Ear. 8 ..,% °o �.- . '. _ ,`_O .•L6C 7\ O O O n' W•C•N '.'r p r _ e•! •e Fl 2 p �- 000S o o• \:%<'N 40 CO 0 47 O - _.-__- s- . �1� �WY O , ihti„, O a e�.o f`.� 96 .l1fMH— 9_ IS.pais... 400,4v \. ... o0rn oo'o� \,..,,, ,... f _� � o • ,.,....:„. •..,_ ii, ...,......,,,_„,..,,,.. 0 0 sop,a Q O �c R ���� ,, \ u x ` 0vv$ ..,,, .: ..,..., co N3 0 7., > _ m • Ire„. .." ,:te:7iA,► JamcCOmz DE'I� a ill 11r446-:fr lir '4"-)- \--.'‘'L2 =1 El CD immlim 1 8 : Ilk \i ie. if Fr, / •I OOS WUN �•N ` ,t-i / \ (.•4,L\ Th ^^ • O O O ,O V �/ WNW O t -0-0-0-Q).„, 1 R•- r N— t ► illy SSSpNNN•- w01N ' , WW>W/ II (nw,I mooWo. 01 mV V __ WWu -00000.8OJv i p � z 0 0 0 O O O OVON � Z i1 —I SSS' It�]/��/, ! ,.. - , i. , m I/ riF,x 7,-_, _,_ NNW , r 1 I _ ,..., _,_ , O N V ,1 Jf So0S II /I �� >wuu= \ .XI 0000IP �,�, '(O Da C \ z , 11� `4S ��T�Q -Sgoo , ___, z C \ r- 2. �I N cn u+ �, Ii”" •��� //TTVV //VVV���\JJJ 1 D D ',\ \ '' • 0.. AWG ooOj 1 I -\ I- NaA .. 000- • i -�7•� A1�D _ -1,s"\• r. 000 a 'JOdO ^'I T� C.0 ! pf); n �� 000 5000 ` J T•��1, N �{� �) it g i S3 �, � 9,9 > Z I •• _�;; - .... ' .... ' '• Wum $ ( Win W WC ___ O 0 Oyy -Tl -0 0 77K - 1,____.--,,,„V - o 'I� 8838Imo XC �<0 n O I ;, 300■ 0 In � � * T I n.3 IV l�Ti� C 0000 , ^� Z 000^.0 ' CO • z % m ; f 2 $ \ u < E E CO CC o A < < < < iri� a (0 \ \ z § *1-- C 2 § k [ 0 ILIC CL ZcsiE > \ b { o 0 = k co 0 ] 5 CO co g CI k ofCO f SI as f k 2a CO 1:_i co q I ( • _ co Lu k / k .- 0 fa- w o § - -N 0 -N 0 -N CO0 CO0 ƒ / co f Q � m / { / E - O m . \ ik / § «▪ —1 2 j C c § rZ - , 0 / \ $ CO - LU I a ott 2 2 a = a 22 0 c c o c c c k a k { 1- « o § $ q $ q 111 q L1.1 / § E 2 E 2 Q u. E k k k k k k k § } k ) . ) DLLI 2 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] § / .o k \ Y LU \ / } � 0 kd W0 _ CO { ƒ - 8 ± c 2 z § \ ) � ) � � ) � ) � �13 t / � � } } / } « G $ 9 \ ) ( } ( § � § / § ( ( k § / � � ® - e — Q � k � f- 0 \ § \ § \ @ d@ k ) ln .0 ICI � 5 (C)C w k w • e2 k - & � @ ® § � co � � - 0),_ 03 o ° ® ° & ® 1- & = m ° ° ° ° co < ( \ k 2 CD ILI D b 0 / ) & 0 Cr) 0 CO 0 COLk) 0 COk S 2 k t a w = � I � = E \ Q C r I ® , P. 2 ` _ ._ - - A 0 CO N 01 O> CO M CO M O O J co0`- co� � ,F Q N sr N CO N N X • Co L 0 ` )a o O N N N 0 Q i- CON O N N Co N N O N N a. Q7. r r Q se v H 7 ' Co v 2 e-I IS.- n e- O )- O O ,_ ea >. p N 0 N Co O O 0 N ; 0 eC O O a F- L H a W ^ U 2 l6 ,D Or r- O) C Q H N N ON mN T. O) N 0 .— D.- y L N N M co y 2 7 N °a O .c O N 'O Er 5 OD .- a?.- a) .- 0 .-- e- C0 .- CO .- 6 aa) w O p) > N T., y 15 • m d y N N• = U N F R ,_ 0) N O , N O 0 -) CO .-- N N- N ti atl a m O a) > 7 $C cs -- O M L a. cn srp p a Q ~ 0) N F.O N O N ^ N N N O N O N t6 d L N N .6m fis (7 a III _0 E O T y e• F Co < n A m m Co .- . '7 M M a — t m a aC W r) o IF Co CO O co d o „� O N m N n N Co r CO N Co r N .- H m co W T I0 N Cn O M 2 U oC Q H N N m N co N CO 0 co N 0 .— 0 r ea qy m C.) 0 0 L a Z 1- x V 1- Co ,_ Co , M M M M N To TO li E co a H w ✓ NCO � Co OD N N � Co OD N CD 0) N 0 8 8 � 0 la CO LL )r U) C C C V, O O O 0 1 b Q Z a) a) a) a) a) a) a) mow w O O E E E E E E E a 5 r- W 7 7 7 7 7 7 > c c c O Q > 6 > 8 > 8 > u > 8 > 8 > 8 a 2 in Z °) o � o � o6 o W O � Ca) Oy a) E a Q Z O a IE. i 2 E 2 E 2 E 2 E 2 E > > > y N y W F- a af)) f� amiC� yC� co co a`0i (� °) m m co =CD W N a a a a a a a ^ N `" Q 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 C e`o R = a a 0. 0.. a a a • __1 W Cls CD ID v) v) v) Z O • re ce• O rr0 coCO • m Z > m o o o o oC = C Z m o CO o r o r z r a) = Q U uU^i 5 w 3 Z w Z W z ci W W Co) 2 S N w Q N F U Q U Q N C N >' C7 w o -- ov~) Via, mai I. CD u.,/- cry • W W F w _ � � � W va W coW °a 0 co O COO ea O Co J = 0. N03 0 a ¢ °' o m °' ui 1— 2 a W 2 Highway 10/Highway 96 Interchange Layouts • Four layouts for the Highway 10/Highway 96 Interchange were revi ewed in order to make an accurate comparison between different levels of access at the intersection and their associated benefits and costs. The traffic model assumed the Highway 96/Highway 10 intersection either had full at-grade access in all directions (scenario 1) or a separated grade crossing with no access between the two roadways (scenarios 2 and 3). In this section, we will evaluate four layouts for the intersection; At-Grade Signalized, Separated Grade-North Access, and Separated Grade- North and South Access and Separated Grade-No Access. In order to provide a minimum level of access for properties in the Highway 96/Highway 10 Triangle and existing TCAAP entrances, access between Highway 96 and Highway 10 to the north must be maintained. Access between these districts and points south and west via Interstate 35W must utilize Highway 96 and Highway 10. At the time of redevelopment of the Highway 96/10 Triangle and TCAAP, the benefits of providing access between Highway 96 and Highway 10 become less apparent. Layout#1: At-Grade Signalized The proposed intersection configuration for this layout is similar to the existing configuration with the exception of free right turn lanes for westbound Highway 96 to northbound Highway 10 traffic and eastbound Highway 96 to southbound Highway 10 traffic. In the interests of • maximizing the efficiency and safety of Highway 96, the intersection of Old Highway 10 and Highway 96 would be relocated to avoid conflict with the Highway 10 intersection. Old Highway 10 would be realigned to run parallel between Highway 96 and Round Lake connecting to Gateway Boulevard west of Round Lake. In order to provide space for Old Highway 10 without impacting Round Lake, the alignment of Highway 96 be shifted north from its current location. Shifting the Highway 96 alignment north will cause additional impacts to the Arden Manor Mobile Home Park. Layout#2: Separated Grade-North Access The proposed intersection configuration for this layout includes bridging Highway 10 over Highway 96 with access ramps from Highway 96 to Highway 10 northbound and from Highway 10 southbound to Highway 96. The general grade of Highway 10 would remain close to its existing grade while Highway 96 would be reconstructed to pass approximately 23 feet below Highway 10. No access would be provided from Highway 96 to Highway 10 southbound or from Highway 10 northbound to Highway 96. Old Highway 10 would be realigned slightly in order to intersect Highway 96 opposite the Highway 10 off ramp. The ramp intersection west of the Highway 10 bridge would be signalized to provide for the large number of vehicles turning left onto Highway 96 and left turning vehicles from Highway 96 to Old Highway 10. It is not anticipated that the ramp intersection east of Highway 96 would warrant a signal at this time. • 10 This layout does not require a frontage road along the north side of Round Lake therefor Highway 96 impacts to the Arden Manor Mobile Home Park should be minimal. Property will need to be acquired from the TCAAP site and private owners in the northwest quadrant of the intersection to accommodate the ramps. Some acquisition of residential property along the northeast shore of Round Lake would also be required in order to improve the roadway geometrics of Old Highway 10. Layout#3: Separated Grade-North and South Access The proposed intersection configuration for this layout includes bridging Highway 10 over Highway 96 with access ramps from Highway 96 to Highway 10 northbound and from Highway 10 southbound to Highway 96. The general grade of Highway 10 would remain close to its existing grade while Highway 96 would be reconstructed to pass approximately 23 feet below Highway 10. In addition to the two access ramps provided in layout#2, access ramps would be provided from Highway 96 to Highway 10 southbound and from Highway 10 northbound to Highway 96. The ramp intersection west of the Highway 10 bridge would be signalized to provide for the large number of vehicles turning left onto Highway 96. It is not anticipated that the ramp intersection east of Highway 96 would warrant a signal at this time. This layout would also require the rerouting of Old Highway 10 to avoid conflicts with the on- ramp to Highway 10 southbound. Old Highway 10 would be realigned to run parallel between Highway 96 and Round Lake connecting to Gateway Boulevard west of Round Lake similar to Layout#1 however the alignment of the on-ramp would require reconstruction of Old Highway • 10 to a point several hundred feet south of Highway 96. This layout would require a significant amount of property acquisition of the residential properties along the northeast shore of Round Lake as well as the Arden Manor Mobile Home Park. Property will need to be acquired from North Heights Church in the southeast quadrant of the intersection and from property owners in the northwest quadrant of the interchange. Layout#4: Separated Grade-No Access The proposed intersection configuration for this layout includes bridging Highway 10 over Highway 96 with no access ramps between Highway 96 and Highway 10. The general grade of Highway 10 would remain close to its existing grade while Highway 96 would be reconstructed to pass approximately 23 feet below Highway 10. Old Highway 10 would be realigned slightly in order to intersect Highway 96 west of the bridge. This layout does not require a frontage road along the north side of Round Lake therefor Highway 96 impacts to the Arden Manor Mobile Home Park would be limited to 4 or six units. Some acquisition of residential property along the northeast shore of Round Lake would also be required in order to improve the roadway geometrics of Old Highway 10. This layout would preclude the Highway 96/10 Triangle and TCAAP from access to points south via I 35W and is not considered a possibility in the short term. Upon redevelopment of TCAAP and the Highway 96/10 Triangle, the removal of north ramps should be considered as a means to improve the function of the Gateway Boulevard/Highway 10 intersection/interchange. 11 Other Issues/Considerations Pedestrian Movements/Access Layout#1,the at-grade signalized intersection would include pedestrian crosswalks at the right turn ramp from Highway 10 to Highway 96 and across Highway 10 mainline. The mainline crossing would include"walk" indicators with push buttons on both sides. The crosswalk could be aligned to utilize the center median to allow pedestrians a sanctuary however it is generally not good design practice to promote pedestrian"layovers"in medians of roadways, especially highways. The trail would continue on to the west between the proposed frontage road and Highway 96. Although Layout#1 does allow for pedestrian movements across Highway 10, it does not provide very desirable conditions for the pedestrian, especially recreational users. The crosswalk at Highway 10 would be over 150 feet long and require the average person approximately 35-45 seconds to cross safely. The speeds of vehicles on Highway 10 routinely exceed 55 mph which is intimidating to pedestrians and potentially dangerous for children who may not be able to correctly gauge vehicle speeds. The pedestrian trail alignment west of Highway 10 would be located between the proposed frontage road and Highway 96 which would not provide very desirable escape routes for trail users as well as isolating the trail from Round Lake and consequently limiting the appeal of the trail to recreational users. Layouts#2 and#4 would include adequate bridge length to provide for the continuation of the Highway 96 Regional Trail under Highway 10. Layout#2 would include a relatively short signalized crossing of Old Highway 10 on the west side of the Highway 10 bridge. The trail would continue along the south side of Highway 96 adjacent to Round Lake. Layout#3 would also provide for the pedestrian trail underpass of Highway 10. The trail would cross an uncontrolled off-ramp from Highway 10 to Highway 96 on the east side of the bridge and a signalized on-ramp on the west side of the bridge. The trail would then continue west between the Old Highway 10 extension and Highway 96 similar to Layout#1. The grade separation of Highway 10 and Highway 96 presents an excellent opportunity to extend the regional trail across Highway 10 safely and efficiently with minimal costs. A pedestrian bridge or tunnel of a similar scope would likely cost in the range of$500,000.00. Gateway Boulevard Alignment The alignment and location of the Gateway Boulevard intersection with Highway 96 is dependent upon whether or not Old Highway 10 is extended along the north shore of Round Lake. In Layouts #1 and#3 which include the Old Highway 10 extension, the Gateway Boulevard intersection is located approximately 950 feet east of the proposed I 35W bridge. In layouts#2 and#4 the intersection would be located approximately 200 feet further east providing an 1150 foot separation from the I 35W interchange. • 12 Existing Highway 10 Accesses g Y • Currently there are four accesses onto Highway 10 north of the Highway 96 interchange. The first access is a right-in, right-out only design and is located approximately 500 feet north of Highway 96 along the northbound segment of Highway 10. The access serves the TCAAP site however, it has not been used recently and based upon discussions with Mike Fix representing TCAAP,the Army would not object to eliminating this access. In order to construct the access ramps for layouts#2 and#3, this TCAAP access would need to be removed. The next access is a full crossing of Highway 10 which serves TCAAP,the Big Ten Supper Club,Arden Manor Mobile Home Park and several single family homes. This access would need to remain until the Highway 96/10 Triangle and TCAAP are redeveloped. This access is located approximately where the traffic model assumes that the future Gateway Boulevard intersection/interchange would be located. The next access is a full crossing of Highway 10 which serves Scherer Bros. Lumber Company and the TCAAP site. This access needs to remain in place until the Scherer Bros. property redevelops unless a connection could be made to the access directly south. Mike Fix of TCAAP has indicated that the TCAAP site would not object to closing this access. Any frontage road connection to the south would need to cross the Minnesota Commercial Railroad spur line which currently runs between the Scherer Bros. property and Arden Manor. 0 The final access is a full crossing of Highway 10 which serves the TCAAP site only. Mike Fix has indicated that this access needs to remain as long as the TCAAP site is operational. Gateway Business District Access The Gateway Business District GBD is located along the western side of Round Lake between Highway 96 and Interstate 694. The district includes several existing commercial businesses with the imminent development of several hundred thousand square feet of office/warehouse and office space planned in the near future. The GBD is served by West Round Lake Road off of Highway 96. Access to and from the GBD from the north, south and west is generally served by Interstate 35W. Access to and from the GBD from the east (including St. Paul) is served by Interstate 694, Highway 10 and Highway 96. Based upon the Twin Cities Regional Travel Model, it is anticipated that approximately 35% of workers and customers visiting the GBD will originate from or depart to the east. This equates to approximately 900 round trips per day after full build out of the GBD. In layouts#2 and#4, no access is provided from Highway 96 eastbound onto Highway 10 southbound which will reduce the convenience of some of the people headed to points east. The loss of the "south ramps" for trips arriving at GBD from the east is less significant since travelers can follow Interstate 694 to Interstate 35W northbound and exit with free right turns at Highway 96 and Gateway Boulevard. It is likely that a large percentage of trips arriving at GBD from the east today utilize Interstate 35W in lieu of Highway 10 to avoid left turns at Highway 96 and • Gateway Boulevard. 13 Storm Drainage • The originally proposed storm wa 96 drainage system for the reconstruction of Highway g Y g y included a regional storm water pond to be constructed adjacent to the northwest shore of Round Lake. This concept would require trunk sewer along Highway 96 from approximately Keithson Drive to the proposed ponding site. The conceptual storm drainage plan works for Layout#1, the at- grade intersection,however significant modifications to the concept plan may need to be made to accommodate the proposed bridge in Layouts#2, #3 and#4. In the bridge alternatives, Highway 96 is lowered significantly creating a relatively flat profile grade which in turn causes difficulties in conveying large volumes of storm water over long distances. In addition, an existing 60 inch diameter storm sewer outfall from the TCAAP site crosses Highway 96 just west of the proposed bridge and drains into Round Lake. The original plan allowed for clearance of the Highway 96 storm sewer over the TCAAP outfall line, however with the lower profile of Highway 96 required for the bridge crossing, the two storm sewers intersect each other. For these reasons, it is likely that a regional storm water pond (for Highway 96 drainage) will need to be constructed in the vicinity of the Highway 10 and Highway 96 interchange in layouts #2, #3 and#4. The preferred location of the pond would be in the southwest or southeast quadrant of the interchange however other quadrants may be feasible as well. The pond would require approximately 0.5 to 0.75 acres of land depending on adjacent slopes. • Ramp Metering/HOV Based upon discussions with Bob Brown of MnDOT State Aid, it is unlikely that the north access ramps for the Highway 96/Highway 10 interchange would be required to be metered or include HOV facilities. These ramps would be considered "temporary"in that upon redevelopment of the TCAAP site, a new interchange at Gateway Boulevard would be constructed and the north ramps removed from Highway 96. If ramps were built to the south, they would be viewed as permanent facilities and likely would be considered for metering and or HOV provisions by MnDOT. TCAAP Property Acquisition We anticipate that the process to acquire property from the federally owned TCAAP site will require over two years. Mike Fix from TCAAP has been shown preliminary drawings of the proposed access ramp in the northeast quadrant of the intersection. Mr. Fix stated that he had no objection with the alignment and taking of property but warned that it may be difficult to acquire the necessary area in time to construct the roadway in 1999 or 2000. If the council decides to proceed with layout#2 or layout#3, immediate coordination with the U.S. Army will be necessary to begin the process of acquisition. A possible alternative to impacting the TCAAP property would be to construct a loop in the southeast quadrant of the • 14 intersection, in the North Heights Church property to allow for access to northbound Highway 10 from Highway 96. This alternative could be explored further if negotiations with the U.S. Army do not proceed on schedule. • 15 i Project Budget Costs Budget level construction costs have been estimated in order to provide a relative comparison between each of the four layouts described in the report. The estimated costs only address major project items such as signal systems, turn lane construction,roadway/frontage road extensions, access ramps,retaining walls. Costs for the through lane construction of Highway 96 have not been included since they would be the same in all layouts. Costs for other standard items including lighting, storm drainage and traffic control have not been included for the same reason as the mainline. The costs associated with bridge construction on Highway 10 would be nearly identical for layouts#2, #3, and#4 and have not been included in the comparison. The following is a summary of comparison costs for each of the four layouts. Further breakdowns of the costs are included in the appendix. Layout#1: At-Grade Intersection Estimated Budget Comparison Cost $710,000.00 Layout#2: Grade Separated Interchange,North Access Estimated Budget Comparison Cost $747,250.00 • Layout#3: Grade Separated Interchange,North and South Access Estimated Budget Comparison Cost $1,498,500.00 Layout#4: Grade Separated Interchange,No Access Estimated Budget Comparison Cost $305,000.00 11, 16 Property Acquisition Summary • The following is a listing of the anticipated amount of property acquisition required for the four layouts considered in this report. The impacted parcels and areas noted are based upon the preliminary layouts in the report and are intended for comparison purposes only. Final acquisition areas will be determined upon the completion of final design plans. Layout#1: At Grade Intersection: Total Number of Parcels Impacted: 1 Impact to Arden Manor Mobile Home Park: 11 - 19 Homes Layout#2: Grade Separated Interchange,North Access Total Number of Parcels Impacted: 6 Total Number/Area of Full Acquisition Parcels: 4/96,500 SF Impact to Arden Manor Mobile Home Park: 6 - 11 Homes Acquisition from TCAAP Site: 200,000 SF Layout#3 Grade Separated Interchange,North and South Access Total Number of Parcels Impacted: 13 Total Number/Area of Full Acquisition Parcels: 10/253,740 SF Impact to Arden Manor Mobile Home Park: 11 - 19 Homes Acquisition from TCAAP Site: 200,000 SF • Acquisition from North Heights Church: 25,000 SF Layout#4 Grade Separated Interchange, No Access Total Number of Parcels Impacted: 3 Total Number/Area of Full Acquisition Parcels: 3/79,105 SF • 17 Summary • This report has presented the results of various analyses performed around the intersection of Highway 96 and Highway 10 in order to provide the Council with the information necessary to select the best fit design of the intersection for Arden Hills. The traffic analyses indicates that the current intersection functions poorly at PM Peak Hours and will continue to decline unless the intersection is grade separated or Highway 10 is expanded to six through lanes. The traffic model also indicated that a key access point to a redeveloped TCAAP site would need to be located along Highway 10 between Highway 96 and Interstate 35W. The Highway 96 and Highway 10 intersection is limited in the role it can play relative to future.access to the TCAAP site. Four basic alternative layouts were considered for the Highway 10 and Highway 96 Interchange. All four are constructable but have widely varying implications relative to cost,private property, safety, access and adaptability for the future. Layout#1 maintains the full access at-grade intersection and extends Old Highway 10 across Round Lake to Gateway Boulevard. Layout#2 and layout#3 provide improvement to traffic operations for today and into the future while providing access for businesses and residents in the Highway 96/10 Triangle and the TCAAP site as well as other City residents. Layout#4 represents a possible future condition where the north access ramps have been removed to allow for a new full access interchange on Highway 10 serving a redeveloped TCAAP site and Highway 96/10 Triangle. Layout#4 could be constructed today but would pose serious access hardships on the Highway 96/10 Triangle 40 properties and TCAAP operations. Budget cost estimates and property acquisition estimates have been provided to assist with comparing the relative merits of the alternatives. Several other considerations have been discussed as well including pedestrian access, implications to the alignment of gateway boulevard, gateway business district access and storm drainage which are affected greatly by the various alternatives. • 18 APPENDIX A BUDGET CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES • 19 • Highway 96/Highway 10 Interchange Configuration Budget Cost Estimate Layout#1:At-Grade Signalized Intersection Unit Total Item No. Description Unit Quantity Price Amount 1 Signal System LS 1.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 2 Turn Lane Construction LF 2800.00 $75.00 $210,000.00 3 Old Hwy 10 Extension LF 1400.00 $250.00 $350,000.00 Total Budget Comparison Cost $710,000.00 • • • Highway 96/Highway 10 Interchange Configuration Budget Cost Estimate Layout#2: Grade Separated-North Access Unit Total Item No. Description Unit Quantity Price Amount 1 Signal System LS 1.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 2 Turn Lane Construction LF 1560.00 $75.00 $117,000.00 3 Access Ramps LF 3250.00 $125.00 $406,250.00 4 Old Hwy 10 Realignment LF 900.00 $250.00 $225,000.00 5 Retaining Wall SF 5800.00 $20.00 $116,000.00 Total Budget Comparison Cost $747,250.00 S Highway 96/Highway 10 Interchange Configuration Budget Cost Estimate Layout#3:Separated Grade-North and South Access Unit Total Item No. Description Unit Quantity Price Amount 1 Signal System LS 1.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 2 Turn Lane Construction LF 1560.00 $75.00 $117,000.00 3 Access Ramps LF 6500.00 $125.00 $812,500.00 4 Old Hwy 10 Extension LF 2200.00 $250.00 $550,000.00 5 Retaining Wall SF 6800.00 $20.00 $136,000.00 • Total Budget Comparison Cost $1,498,500.00 Highway 96/Highway 10 Interchange Configuration Budget Cost Estimate Layout#4:Separated Grade-No Access Unit Total Item No. Description Unit Quantity Price Amount 1 Tiun Lane Construction LF 800.00 $75.00 $60,000.00 2 Old Hwy 10 Realignment LF 900.00 $250.00 $225,000.00 3 Retaining Wall SF 1000.00 $20.00 $20,000.00 Total Budget Comparison Cost $305,000.00 • Item No. 3 Staff Report No. Meeting Date: April 6, 1998 . Type of Business: W.K. WK: Work Session;PH.•Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works Item Title/Subject: Reconsideration of City Hall HVAC System and Building Needs Date of Report: March 27, 1998 As the cooling season rapidly approaches us, staff is requesting Council revisit the feasibility study performed by Wold Architects and Engineers, and the letter of recommendation presented to the City by BA Associates, Inc. regarding the problems in the basement of City Hall. Staff requests Council bring their copies of the Wold report to the meeting for reference. Staff has copied several pages highlighting the options presented earlier. A minimum amount of rehabilitation for the HVAC system, building roof, tuckpointing, fire suppression, and waterproofing the basement will be $244,900.00. The other options for mainly the HVAC system will providelonger term solutions, higher air quality, and increased efficiency, but will also require higher capital investment. 410 Staff seeks Council direction in this matter. Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works IMounds View City Hall Wold Architects and Engineers Renovation Study November 3, 1997 1 OPOPTION 1 - Replace Rooftop Units I This option may seem only a short-term solution. After all, rooftop units have a fairly short life expectancy of 12-15 years. They provide only one control zone per unit. It can also be difficult to keep these units serviced properly to provide adequate ventilation and control. However, r we also believe that the work of Option #1 could be accomplished with the least amount of disruption in service. The occupants are familiar with the operation of the rooftop units. They are also very familiar to local service contractors. There would also be some rebates available j from NSP for an increase in unit efficiency. !! The roof of the 1974 and 1961 building sections has deteriorated to the point that it should be I replaced immediately. The single-ply membrane over the 1974 building section seems to have suffered considerable shrinkage. It has already pulled away from the curbs supporting the rooftop units, and it will soon separate from the perimeter parapet flashings. The roof above t the 1961 section is a built-up style and is simply decayed. 1 Six of the eight units are located above these sections of the building; including the three that I do not function on cooling. In Option#1A, we propose to replace three inoperative units, in Option #1 B we propose replacing the five older rooftop units. Then the oldest of the rooftop units would have been installed in 1994. III Costs: I General Costs 1A 1B • Roofing $ 105,000 $ 105,000 • Tuckpointing $ 4,000 $ 4,000 I • Fire Protection UL $ 18,750 $ 18,750 HVAC Equipment $ 33,000 $ 60,000 Electrical $ 7.500 $ 10,000 I $ 168,250 $ 197,750 Factor for Contingency, Fee & Misc. Costs x 1.28 x 1.28 ITotal Option 1 $ 215,000 $ 253,000 I I 1 Page 2 Commission No. 97102 I Mounds View Cit Hall November 3, IVvi Renovation Study • OPTION 3 - Central Penthouse Unit the drawback of the central unit described in Option#2 above is the loss of floor Since majorpenthouse to propose to construct a penthouse at the rear of the space, we have included other options toexamine the costs of constructing a p s contain the new unit. In Option#3, we over the 1994 addition, directly behind the council chambers. This location seem building, both ' ble because it provides easy access for ductwork to owevere, nt his option we prove area vide 19des�ra only building te and e since construction of the penthouhe police areas of the 1961 se will require the removal of at least one only one alternative of the newer units. Costs: General Costs $ 105,000 • Roofing $ 4,000 • Tuckpointing $ 14,000 • Fire Protection UL HVAC Systems• 50 Replace Rooftop Units 1-4 & 8 $ 164,$ 4,9950 • Electrical • $ 7,500 Demo $_ • Construction of New Penthouse Space, Shafts and Louvers $ 366,700 Factor for Contingency, Fee & Misc. Costs x —28 $ 469,000 Total Option 3 I Page 8 Commission No. 97102 Mounds View City Hall Wold Architects and Engineers Renovation Study November 3, 1997 • OPTION 5 - New City Hall Facility The final and most expensive option we have examined is simply to construct a new City Hall and Police Facility. There are many obvious benefits in the favor of this option, and some strong reasons why this may be unwise at this time. However, a new building could be built at any time in the near future and the decision to investigate this as a viable option would encourage the city to consider replacing only the three non-functional units at this time. We have included the cost of replacing these units, patching the roof over the 1974 and 1961 section of the building. In our analysis of the cost of constructing a new 20,000 sq. ft. building as needed immediate repairs while the City develops a new facility. Costs: HVAC Systems • Minimal repair or replacement of $ 33,000 non-functional units • Electrical $ 7,000 Construction Costs • 20,000 SF Facility $2,200,000 • Roof Patch $ 30.000 Factor for Contingency, Fee & Misc. Costs $2,270,000x 1.25 Total Option 5 $2,905,000* *This total does not include the costs for land purchases and site development. • Page 12 Commission No. 97102 111/1 Assuming the perimeter waterproofing system has failed, one might expect the perimeter foundations will require excavation and waterproofing. Under the worst case scenario, the projected repair cost would be as follows: Mobilization - $2, 700.00 Excavation - 4,200.00 Drain Tile - 1,800.00 Waterproofing - 6,300.00 Insulation - 2,100.00 Interior Drainage - 1,700.00 Backfill - 5,100.00 Landscaping - 3, 500.00 Concrete Slab Work - 2,500.00(allowance) TOTAL $29,900.00 The interior drainage is based on interior slab removal and dimpled sheet lining along the wall between the City Administration and Police Administration. you have any questions, please contact me for an explanation. ncerel Y. /31-2,frek-* am-G1-2.:-A.-0-1,—., Brent Anderson P.E. baa.brentZ.MVleakage • • 1110 .. Item No. 4 Staff Report No. Meeting Date: April 6, 1998 WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA: Consent Agenda;CB: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works Item Title/Subject: Review of LMC Trust Insurance Investigation of Water Main Break Date of Report: March 25, 1998 Attached for Council's review is the League's investigation of the water main break at 7680 Knollwood Drive, the residence of Ms. Louise Borgert. Ms. Borgert appeared before Council at the March 23, 1998 meeting in regards to this incident. Staff has also attached the previously presented staff memos. MEMO To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works 0 Subject: Water Main Break Date: March 13, 1998 • On February 10, 1998 staff received a call from Ramsey County Dispatch regarding a possible water main break at 7670 Knollwood Drive. Staff responded to the scene, verified the main break, shut off water, notified residents and repaired the break the next day. Attached is a memo from staff regarding the events and conversations that took place on February 10. The resident at 7680 Knollwood Drive experienced water running on the surface between two houses and entering the house through the walk out basement. Staff spoke with the resident, explaining that he could file a claim at City Hall. His claim would be examined by the City's insurance carrier, and he would be notified of their findings. The League's Insurance adjuster investigated the claim and the City's procedures in the repair and found the City to be of no fault of the main break or procedures for shut off and repair. Consequently the resident's claim of$5,000.00 was denied. In subsequent conversations with the resident, he has implied that this resolution is totally unacceptable and will pursue legal action in the matter. Staff informed the homeowner that this is the extent of action that staff is capable of taking. He may however appeal to the City Council. It is possible that the resident will appear before 0 Council at the March 23, 1998 Council meeting. MC 145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 of Minnesota Cities Phone: (612) 281-1200 • (800) 925-1122 \1111C;ties pYOmotil g amoell.„c. Fax: (612) 281-1299 • TDD (612) 281-1290 February 26, 1998 Louise Borgert 7680 Knollwood Drive Mounds View, MN 55112 BRS #: 11021721 TRUST MEMBER: CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CLAIMANT: BORGERT D/OCCURRENCE: 2-10-98 Dear Ms. Borgert: The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust provides coverage to our trust member, the city of Mounds View. This letter follows up our most recent telephone conversation of February 24, • 1998. I have concluded my investigation into the water main break occurring on Feburary 10. The main involved is a 6" cast iron pipe. When the pipe was exposed it was determined to be a shear or circumference fracture and the pipe was in good condition, therefore, the repair was made. We believe the cause of the fracture was due to earth movement during the freeze/thaw temperature conditions. There is not any history of problems on this water main. There is no way for the city to foresee that a water main break will occur. I fail to find any evidence of negligence on the part of the city of Mounds View as a result of this occurrence but rather an Act of God. Therefore, I must respectfully decline to make any offer of settlement to you for the damages you sustained. Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 215-4077. Sincerely, Darlene Boese Adjuster • AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 4* 5 • In vIniic i i. c It. y,7/u '"'�".�/,. �>/f'��t'�/�y ��>T.�>"� > //i7�/: ��"/�sm,�/YG�/ �fl� �y�,�/ ,�j��nm �n i�,'y / ,!_ acs/ a�'7' ,'�,�i' 9%�, / ii //� f,/��i�y� ,y �°y�y ���fs� s�F�/ ��s�'/ /'j/, �� I��'6t � ✓ F / /,�Y'/ / >{ r� / ,r.,,,,:,„,,.,,,..i,�s✓�,,,✓„� a���,il',� "au'F �.i„i,. ./�':;;��/>�.J///au,�rilc�;& ��.1��'�>'/twu,_;,. lir>EE....,�.�'xww»iis'„'�:��_ �-H ✓ku� „�i,5„r;..'i..£��3 '..vi�z'�F�*�.,'ra% ,,,, 2319 Knoll Drive • Mounds View, MN 55112 (612) 786-4696 Fax (612) 717-4398 March 23, 1998 Mayor Duane McCarty Mounds View City Councilmembers 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112-1499 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: OThe City of Mounds View has started down the road of creating a facility that all the citizens of hounds View can be proud of. For the next several months you and your staff will be im- mersed in the full spectrum of the construction-related environment which can be very confus- ing to the uninitiated. You will be expected to understand Value Engineering, Contract Admin- istration, Construction process, and Project Payments, Change Order Review, Analysis, and Negotiations. I am sending you this proposal offering to you and the City of Mounds View my expertise in the Construction Administration of large construction projects. You currently have an Architectural Firm hired whose job is to design a building that will fit your and the city's needs, as they interpret them. Architectural firms design buildings utilizing products and methods that they are used to, not because it's cost effective or is easy to maintain, but because it's what they have done before. The Architectural firm will do project observations but they normally do not have the expertise in construction. The Construction Management Company is hired but their job is to get the project built, not to look out for your or the city's best interest. As an example, look at the problems that have arisen from the remodeling of the existing building. Were they looking out for the city, or for the subcontractors/contractors that they work with all the time? Only by contracting with someone with the right construction background and with only the City of Mounds View's interest at heart can you be assured that you are getting the best product for the taxpayers' money. /95• .� CITY OF SHOREVIEW CITY COUNCIL Cif,w 4600 North Victoria Street, Shoreview, MN 55126 Sandy Martin,Mayor N SINVIEW (612)490-4600 (612) 490-4699 Fax Blake Huffman (612) 490-4750 Voice/TDD Tom Landwehr Mady Reiter Ady Wickstrom March 11, 1998 Mr. Rick Jopke Community Development Director City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 Dear Mr. Jopke: The City of Shoreview is anticipating formal application for development of the former University of Minnesota airport site,east of 1-35W south of County Road J. The City has already completed a traffic study of the site. The traffic study provided information on the amount and type of development which could be permitted with some roadway improvements, and yet not adversely • impact area streets and highways. The developer is also preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), and the City is undertaking a study of Rice Creek Parkway, a major north-south road on the site between County Road I and County Road J. We have been in contact with a number of agencies regarding the development. We also want to keep our neighboring communities informed of the development progress and solicit their input. A meeting has been scheduled to inform City and County government staff of the development and the work completed to date.The agenda will include a summary of the traffic study, a discussion of the potential development, and an explanation of the studies, reviews, and documentation which will made. We will also provide a tentative schedule. The meeting is scheduled for 8:30 a.m., Friday, March 27, 1998, at Shoreview City Hail. A list of invited City and County staff members is enclosed for your information. Please call me if you or someone from your staff can not make the meeting. We appreciate your interest and involvement and look forward to seeing you on March 27. Sincerely, —S --. Terty4chwerm 411 City Manager • Enclosure 4 ec W Ll! N • ; A 112 W NN �_ t- 58 <-186 4-7sr4y 820 4J 4 E--647 COUNTY ROAD "a" 412 403.E �ii 1442 T r' 185-3 LT643 596--, 461--> 2 7)'m 630--, =cCO° /'' 12-1, O j 47-1, rn AO () O Lc) ti Q rnL. `- N ok/. r .W 110 o W F-295 Ui 4-300 ç-124 4-- 25 COUNTY ROAD "%"" 291- 530—> 710r 140-4, o 104-1 -1 r-M N N • \ e LA -fes cP I • Existing Pm Peak Hour Turning Movement Counts `I LE N= SHORE970"__� SE"l'J U of M Parcel _ Shoreview, Minnesota FI G.N 0. _ Location: CO. ROAD ""✓" / /-35W WEST SERWCE ROAD Current Traffic Control: SIGNALIZED ID Co.Rd. J j 4 L NCo.Rd. J j4114 4. a Pa a b Il. zg —---—----3-----1 f 1 Existing Build Scenarios Scenario Level of Service Mitigation Options Existing B Modify Approach Lanes=>LOS B Existing plus F — Add WB TH U of M Parcel — SB LT Lane — Widen (New) Bridge Existing plus Modify Approach Lanes=> LOS C U of M Parcel F — Add WB TH & Area Development — SB LT Lane — Widen (New) Bridge • Traffic Operation Analysis FILE NO. ,584 SHORE9701.00 U of M Parcel Shoreview, Minnesota FI G.N 0. 5 Location: CO. ROAD 'J" /NAPLES STREET Current Traffic Control: 2-WAY STOP CONTROLLED 111 � s Co.Rd. J = / 4d $ 46 ! Co.Rd. J cg +ID i Existing Build Scenarios •Scenario Level of Service Mitigation Options Existing B Signalize & Modify Approach Existing plus Lanes=> LOS D U of M Parcel F — Add EB LT & RT — Add WB LT & RT — Add NB Dual LT, TH, RT Signalize & Modify Approach Existing plus Lanes=> LOS D U of M Parcel F — Add EB LT & RT & Area Development — Add WB LT & RT — Add NB Dual LT, TH, RT - • Traffic Operation Analysis FILE NO. • rSHORE9701.00 �5 U of M Parcel /IMP' Shoreview, Minnesota FI G.N 0. 7 Location: CO. ROAD ✓" /LEX/NGTON AVENUE Current Traffic Control: SIGNALIZED 41110 4D1J (61 (., j4ig %1 Co.Rd. J Co.Rd. J Q C= . P —j ------7-1 0 .=:. 1h1 N O J Existing Build Scenarios ..„ ii Scenario Level of Service Mitigation Options 1 Existing C• Existing plusD Modify Approach Lanes=> LOS C I U of M Parcel — Add EB & WB TH li Existing plus i U of M Parcel D Modify Approach Lanes=>LOS C & Area Development Add EB & WB TH i • �. Traffic Operation Analysis FILE N0. �S U of M Parcel SHORE9701.00 Shoreview, Minnesota FI G.N 0. 9 Location: CO. ROAD 7" / EAST 1-35W RAMPS Current Traffic Control: 1—WA )' STOP CONTROLLED 0/-35W OFF—RAMP) • Co.Rd. I c 314 Co.Rd. � d b d W W Existing Build Scenarios r-. Scenario Level of Service Mitigation Options rt- Existing B Signalize & Modify Approach Existing plus Lanes=> LOS C U of M Parcel F — Add EB & WB RT — Add NB TH — Add SB LT, TH, Dual RT Signalize & Modify Approach Existing plus Lanes=> LOS C U of M Parcel F — Add EB & WB RT & Area Development — Add NB TH — Add SB LT, TH, Dual RT • Traffic Operation Analysis FILE NO. .41,584 SHORE9701.00 � U of M Parcel Shoreview, Minnesota FI G.N 0. 11 i 1 LO V I Q 1 fr I-1:/ rETL---IL 1 '11 ' I J 1 -- , ::/' / /...........4: U--�/ c‘Pil\ ,,____, 11111P 1 u) ii , '1 OL-e61}-67, li-ji • . , " i ' ,P\ s 1----1 .... ,,., ! , i 1 W / / -- - - 1 i 3 0 = - _ ----— -- __ u--fl o---o _ _�1 • 1 • iT / " ���, 7144:7"1"----u. ` r-------- I I I , 4Q /I O , //,' y •1!. I 0 rft- (lin cars,: 4.17.,,,,Ah..> 0 ,,, / ,... \1 i------nL 70--8 .0 a ON : ' -,.': Le / -. • 1 11 ®�, V1 J ( 1M PIM 4• / x e. x �-0 1LTA' -9- ... 0 . \ I lir c," " .1.. 0 WC 44O G C d2d \ O d2 gQ tt II / < < g I. e .^- - n 1 2 =I w 11 1 i e if / G : : e I ri w W -m ri n i•... a 0 0 • 3z . ' C< • 00 / ,� -i 0. / W <il11•1 / _ io =4s.;23 . 1.. .Y 2 1 = j • / 4 E J . / 7 8 - E a N a 1- sN) ei ILI e = 4 1 1 Z 8 W Q O iF i >- 1153 .c- 01 E - W I� LL r ®� is } a / W Z } �o 0 W <= -1 fn to ¢a 1 z W - ; il » o P•, ..........--.. ) . i I . z _ W i J Lij > ,O LS: (( i C1110):1 ,�INnoo 0 W >- 1.° = X o 8 • Cn O HI. General Discussion 11, TCAAP Site: Arden Hills and their consultant(BRW)have recently completed a study of the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant(TCAAP) site redevelopment. It is anticipated that within the next 1 % years, a portion of the site will be released. While no build-out year for the entire site has been identified, it is anticipated that the TCAAP site would ultimately generate approximately 100,000 trips per day,with an • estimated 15,400 trips per day on County Road I. County Road I Improvements: Ramsey County has programmed improvements on County Road I for the year 1999. Ramsey County would like to meet with the Cities of Arden Hills and Shoreview in order to determine the development schedule of the TCAAP and WISPARK sites, and the extents of the required roadway improvements to accommodate the anticipated traffic on County Road I. City of Blaine's Concerns: The City of Blaine has proposed development on-line in the vicinity of the proposed WISPARK development. These developments were considered in the U of M Parcel traffic study as part of the potential future area development. While the City of Blaine would be supportive of improvements to the County Road J bridge over I-35W, they would also like to see improvements to the 95th Street bridge, as well as adjustments to the I-35W ramp metering rates. County Road J Bridge: Anoka County previously submitted an ISTEA application for the County Road J bridge over I-35W,but the project received a low ranking. The bridge is currently ranked 4th on Anoka County's project priority list. Mn/DOT does not have the bridge currently programmed for improvements due to the bridge's relatively high sufficiency rating. Anoka County and/or Ramsey • County will lily reapply for Federal funding for the County Road J bridge improvements. Mounds View would like see improvements to the County Road J interchange area to help relieve some of the future traffic on County Road I. IV. Next Steps: • Approach Mn/DOT in regards to getting the County Road I bridge improvements into programming. • Finalin.the U of M Parcel traffic study,incorporating the WISPARK-development proposal. • Arden Hills and•Shoreview need to meet with Ramsey County to discuss County Road I improvements. SSIRAMsWA( {oREVW1Wz 141N.WPn • • •• • Page 2 Ak14 • INTER OFFMEMO ICE To: Chuck Whiting From: Rick Jopke Subject: Mermaid Project Date: April 3, 1998 Attached is a recent fax received from Dave Maroney concerning the proposed Mermaid project. Dave has been in contact with John Seibert and has taken another look at the numbers. John Seibert/Charlie Hall have stated that they continue to need a total of$1,700,000 of TIF assistance for the project. The $1,700,000 includes $800,000 for land costs. Any land costs over and above $800,000 would require additional TIF assistance over and above $1,700,000. The developers have suggested that if the City were to acquire the Rentall business on the corner and provide the land at no cost to them that the $800,000 could cover the acquisition of the remaining parcels. They suggest that the costs for acquiring the Rentall business could come from TIF funds designated for Highway 10 redevelopment. Dave Maroney's projections show that the issuance • of$2,120,000 of bonds would be required to provide $1,700,000 of assistance. Dave indicates that the project would generate $218,500 of TIF which would not pay back the bonds. Only $1,525,000 of bonds could be supported by$218,500 of annual increments. Evergreen Land Services is uncomfortable with providing acquisition and relocation costs without appraisals being done. However a ballpark number they have given me is a total cost of all 4 properties of$1,080,000. This would mean that$280,000 would have to be found from other funds such as the funds designated for Highway 10 redevelopment. Bruce's latest projections show approximately $50,000 to $100,000 a year available for Highway 10 redevelopment projects. The total shortfall based on Dave's numbers and Evergreen's projections would be $455,000. This could go higher if acquisition and relocation costs exceed Evergreen's estimates. • 04/03/98 12:15 COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC. 4 16127843462 NO.239 P002 • • J Subject: Hotel Project Proposal P Revised TIF Assumptions Date: April 1, 1998 Assumptions 1. TIF Hotel/Banquet Facility(105 rooms) JCS Development Proposal dated January 5, 1998 • 2. Tax increments captured for 15 years beginning in the year 2000 and ending in 2014. 95% of TIF available for debt service. 3. Taxable TIF Revenue Bond issued on 7/1/98; 15 year amortization; and for planning purposes, an interest rate of 7.25%. 4. Issuance expense budget provides for 24 months of capitalized interest, finance fees and legal costs. 5. Stable tax increment revenues and no project expansion. • 6. Rent-All is acquired with funds from the Mounds View Economic Development Project Fund("pooled account"). PEreliminaryBudget Profile Hotel Facility Banquet Center Totals Development Costs $5,905,000 $1,660,000 $7,565,000 Tax Increment Assistance $1,000,000 $ 700,000 $1,700,000 % of Development Costs 17% 42% 22% TIF -Acquisition $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 800,000 TIP -Project Costs $ 600,000 $ 300,000 $ 900,000 Annual TIF Estimate $ 178,500 $ 40,000 $ 218,500 Prglimi_pary Debt Projections Annual TIF Bond Issue Issuance Expenses Net Proceeds 1. $218,500 $1,900,000 $375,000 $1,525,000 411) 2. $245,000 $2,120,000 $420,000 $1,700,00(0 (1) Developers request is for$1,700,000. i‘11 ASC. • o National Youth Golf Center NSC • i Unique partnership with the Professional Golf Association Tour (PGA Tour) • The PGA Tour will design the course(valued 4110 at $1,000,000) • The PGA Tour will maintain the course on a net cost basis • Press release and USA Today article J Complements the multi-sport dimension of the National Sports Center • Largest amateur sports complex in the world • Increase economic benefits • Increase social benefits by expanding youth participation • MINNESOTA AMATEUR SPORTS COMMISSION 1700 105th Avenue NE•Blaine, Minnesota 55449-4500•(612) 785-5630•fax(612) 785-5699•tdd 800-627-3529 toll free 800-500-8766•e-mail masc@citilink.com•www.masc.state.mn.us An Equal Opportunity Employer • :National Sports Center Site Map. ,.„.„.„.._....„4„.„....„... ,.,,,,,...,:„..,..: .,,. :".k ..„ t m4 fv -4v 15, A aI5,?;, , > :441: � y_ G- f $ " '.-, .t- y '-.4-..4.,144, n p4,Sk 0 __,_,,„ ,_,..!�` s . * ? ..--i ...„1.b.-- -_..—,-&-.4,-.-y,,,,tbp!!-1'7-,-.1....,,,.,".. ;i::. -, , . . . ,.._.,,,.,,,,..,,..,e-4,,..,,,,t5.$,,-1,- .. .is I ii!N , .. .„,,.,:,. . , : ,., i . - - ' ....e. / v ro ;7"46 -,,,..a J . , • [(All . r x ''.:,2'4,',:kti. • ''t ' ii„---.,,..' . (matir,4017,.. - , •,,•_..,:t-li,i 7 G3'W ` • "1,1!;; A a r /'�F Si114S F ' am { 2 .4 ms fi ., - �, v , • • :..S41 V_,,, '.',..,,,,ellal'''Sttiti4M • '• fit.'. . '.. • • . ....../10 7.-,.-41,,--• vil.t.„:„....1., , 4k•ki•-,..,,,,, - • 't • i � 5 . ' �:' 11.4 Poil 1---;K-*,0'4'..-6-ilep,1. -A •‘? -,•,„-..v.,d,,,,,,,.....,-,..----N. .. wln ' ales * i g�sz� .z F li'0i i7/ f I - - , P� f • 18 i Holes..L...., .` National Youth r r"' . . . 1 9 • Golf Holes National Center Sports 0 , Center I .Practice Holes and ., Future Expansion Minnesota's youth. • Does it make sense to expend the money to transport kids to a central facility when they have nowhere to play once they get back home? If alternatives are not possible,we would be in full support of a center that had safeguards in place to ensure that the facility would be for youth only and could not be converted to just another municipal course if it doesn't support itself A policy of open adult times would by anyone using common sense, put heavy pressure on the operators of the course if there were funding problems in the future. If there were to be open adult only times,the suggestion would be to make them play at a premium above the area rates in order to subsidize the discounted youth rounds and to make this practice very limited. Another problem with open adult tee times is,how do you ensure that a parent with their children would be allowed to play at a much slower pace than the adults coming in behind them. John D. Hammerschmidt City of Mounds View . Golf Course Manager • Zd WdZZ:ZT 866T 02 'xeW 9T80 Z6Z ZT9 : 'ON BNOHd 3S f100 4109 3a0ai21a 8H1 : WONJ UJI t/:'j:ll 4::13 G1 2755 144 ra::,1ESTII. are<$ PAGE P., ;FCX WINTHaO? N2TINE c:J1 .. 5'.4c 10:II/ST. i0tr2,E�>>o9c34 F 2 IOTA GOLF MaNBSOTA S.Craor 41) ASSOCIATION l3+tC of 1112 PGA r �^ March 4 1995 l r ,Gd Arm Meds. Tom Duty, Chairman: Ca' �s Paul Endow;Fee ea�tive Director /' mosora Amateur Sports Commission 1700.1054 Avawe N,E. Q/�Gss Blaine,Mansions 55449-4500 /6// Dear Tam sand Peel: Enclosed is our letter confirming the Maesota Golf Aasocietion's and the Minnesota Section of the PGA's support of the Minnesota Amstar Sports Comns#ndoe's proper junior golf feaSty (the"Nation Youth Golf Center')sr the Nation:I Sports Canter in Blaine.Manama. The continued expansion of junior golf in the Steers of Minnesota is a priority ofthe MGA and the Mbomou Secdon of the PGA. That is why the MGA and the)4thnesota Section of the PGA Look faevnvd to working with the Mmaesota Autstau Span Coaaissiian in Cowtadon with the National Youth Golf Canter We Eden that junior golf cwt be significantly expanded in the Sate of Damon* when the resource, and samisen of the MGA ( e.g., iv 400+nsesnber Courses, maty of width acedy coact junior gaff programs; its approximately 91,000 MGA • Asaoetvs Members; fu etpeeieaca in running junior golf programa ai its outreach throughout the Scats of Miatneetoti.)and du Mimeo=*s Sect a of the POA (e.g.,Its 333 golf professionals) are combined with amiability to the National Youth Golf Cann That is wby the MGA and the • Mmaesota Section of the PGA accepted the Mumasota Amateur Sports Commiuion'a invitation to parpdpase in the MASC`s"Pi es Com"(to provide input into the design of the golf comms so they will be suited for jntttiars of ail Lewis of pixy) and the MASC's "Program Coemittee"(to amiss in the formulation and piem mtetioi:ofJunior soh-pogrom, events end moans,including11133titeitgli0C golf programs,events and coaspetitiona). However, one point that needs to be nude is that the MAX,by staring seta junior gold is not -._.%s void_ Thee are ntnnero golf 9clliaasthe of hfnmexota, i.e., an infrastructure aimed). n: n tort % ua s norus rho Stale of Maa►wota. This may not have bees the cue with tome oT hockey. Int addition, there are u n crows*tier golf rayons conducted throughout the State of Mumasota. These Dior golf programs are =Muted for all ages by nwrmraus golf courses (boat public and private). youth groups, nay gasps.junior high schools, high schools and other organisations, Although it is Moult to determine the exact ember of juniors who participese le then progtsms, ws estimate there are 10,000-15,000 juniors who currently participate in junior golf programs of some type • • • • 11) MEMO To: Mr. Chuck Whiting From: John D. Hammerschmidt Subject: Revised Budget and 15 Year forecast Date: April 3, 1998 I have submitted a 15 year budget forecast that gives us a very clear picture of the • Bridges Golf Course finances. We now have a 2 'h year history of revenues and expenses that allow us to have a fair amount of confidence in our forecast.Bruce has been invaluable in helping me arrive at these projections. The assumptions I am making in order for these numbers to have relevance are on pages B and C. Several assumptions that are important to note are: 1) We maintain an average of 45,000 rounds of per year 2) The practice range has an increase of 55% over the next three years(lights and advertising) 3) Any further expenses involving lawsuit issues are either recovered by the lawsuit or funded thru a separate loan. So far all expenses have been paid • thru operating revenues. 4)Maintain an average growth of 4%in revenues and 3% in expenses. Important details of this budget forecast are: 1) Cash End of Year must maintain a$300,000 reserve for the bond. That money is not available until the year 2013. 2)Net Income in 1995, 1996, 1997, has been skewed by expenses incurred by lawsuit in added labor and attorney fees. 3)Page D shows that a 5%drop in revenues will affect Cash End of Year by over$550,000. A) This shows how important it is to both stay better than our current competition and to be concerned about future competition. B)It also makes it evident that we need to explore all opportunities for additional revenues that will positive cash flow. *Lighting the entire golf course * Miniature Golf * Batting Cages *Food and beverage service * Range expansion * Year round lesson facility * 3 hole loop for youth golf . 4)By the year 2014 cash flow will increase by$400,000 per year by having the bond paid off. •A A. a '� °I 31 ;i e7I 0 2I o a> 0r^'n 7','OA7-,aa A,'.I>'n<a>'n Pa I '1 a. -I s ?nn„^,y aM T�'P^ 3 .^R ^ ylm 9'3 '13r�' i� - ai•^. �.x- ^ =a ^ 3 = ^ a �'na °e n' 3 ^ a o oya ^ •^. ^ W 3 o.m ^ al u s Ua n °= I = Ino n u w 9 :0 < o y u S1 = 1In i`t o1n i`! n y`t'•Ilj fn`t :�II^f b't .. ^i'! i"ym�e AI'ym V ^ c' a n '.y :•I 4Y C j rl 3 v, ti 't u - § at n a m O o a. aa.? O 33 14 V. 0a.YN N N L A b.01 N N J A b• W =Au.a.,- Npb_ WWQNNOO.J pQ vela. a O N N A W >- W . 4 J N N W..b J N I A A 0 •N N N VI J N I- N W Z ... ..:41101 N O W NO3aNb J J U W b I. a I" N a N b 03 O 44.b 3 a almo-v OabWau�O0 4 8 8 8 8 I8 a 8 8 8 U 8 W A U INA 888 O ggU1g3m W 88NggN o0 B80 I^ = gU = '0 N 8y a gN N N N N gN N -.9. 52!4 a-- 3 '6 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 4 8 § 8 O 8 O O 8 8A 8 NS s O s 888 A- J Lpa ONO N ..... C3-a N O1 O OI M = N = DO I r {^ +0 ,ON1 N N N N = 'q r 3 0 aQQQ la 1... 4 8 § 8 § 8 § o § 8 88 a 8 8 § §88 - CO 717 CI_ O WO1.--N a.',"0a M N_ W O N _a N O N N N N N 4, 4.414,Harr 'j b 2 NN4 y g a -8"000§§8§88§8 . 8 O 8 O 8 8 O O 8 u O 8 8 O U Z$88 a.° NL U Q. sN N N N N ^ N N 11 _3W- W A NV N = N ssQQQ1soso , s s o s s s $s L. iir QN O W to U a ta ca.4 0N N J UP CO � H N_ 8N _ as 44 N N 8tot N N N N I^ N N 8N 0_b- 3 3 0000§§8888§8 4 S O S O S S O O 8 O 8 8 8 8 N 0 8 8 o ao en OM O%OI WQ NhDUQ N U L. r a 54 a a W N W N N - ANN 30 • 700o§§25cNw8258 > 8 § 8 § 8 8 x 8 0 0 8 8 8 8 0 �88 "N CI N• Q- es U- MV7' M A N N N N aemWNVNN = J N W N a N.001006.1.... ▪ �QQO 48 8 § o 8 88 8 8u S o 88 8 888 31 enQ- b .....0 N a as 34 a . N -J NoWW0sa . 44 54 O 44 N aN W N N a- 3 OSOOO _ "AOOOO OSO 48g8 $ 8 oOSo O 8 8 S u OS O b N CO u1 N Si .`88O$$N88a3O0 qqW 30a V `^ W 80 8N 4 8a N 0% N W BANW O . 4 O o Q O O O O S O O 8 S 4 8 O 8 O 8 O O O 8 O O 8 8 S O O S 8 It G 0 0 NJ OS b aI -IIA N O W O a N •I^ a.. 0 =B W A 1=V A 'W ta J 4.0' N"'N 0.3 S.W A.. �O e rNN�pa N N N Q O S O i O ,`Qj, V oq A w N QgN WO`SW U a IO00S000r N a 0 W 0. W. �u�� v\ N\O I a S W \S S 6 S S ^I I r r NJ IaI fa Vaaka to!VWbCh uA M ='O in •'aa I=. A IN. J W 4419 NWA=N '.O -aI IOI Q p V ...0'. 3 J O O lA• a C. N O' N Ir O A N a V U U N 81000S8888;81:8 I qp$ Q 8 0 8 p 8 �`'�8p SVN. p OIO O O O O O O a S a 0 �Q 4 O 8 O iOI $ U b &I18 N.1 8 4:18 W=8 8 8 I G8 I OJ N V J A W b a A N 0 W O 4..!-"t_ I•-.9- . a W W W W . _ 3 O pp pp. RSN J v• W W ANN O rOOOpQO1J 01 iA 'pp 8 Q' 1 .9' aQ WQN N`,Q�.pN A UWN � Q• �`QOI ONIJA tO ' 5A `O�O IV O }..IA IQw`��0 W�Y.8 N l O a AOO 8 ^ O p�OI N a y1 NI N Jos W W b y,gyp =0 Ob. AI tJOONJ30 N N r 0 0Q.A i •`"A NWJ N NWN aoI"IN 0WUWN O p. ..-... J 8 W U !,..s. 3 b 8 r O !=-8—§ pj : 2:4 N g W'O 4 8 30O a.N UN10 W Q W4 Q . IO 4I n3 Oe 1810 000880bs 008 IN:8 N Ns. IN8 It",-,:t2 aaS tJ `O la8SS ON O. A 1 I y •Oa- iON NN La OOOAO3Ow ' l': 1.4 NW =. a I.!.'.:1 1NW WNAW .!..c.... 3 i IIR_8 rQ• , A aRU 8N ,n,.8-. _- 41/0 w j NN 00r Cawe e NO O O S O NO OOa i I OJ 00 W ;N30 s. ..i.".N ai..O s eS w 8 17,41S88 W 08 8 I ^u � I , WOVa NWN WNNwAN• ICN»30 UImo.... 00•• N. N 2. Ne NO O O 8 O O 0 W N A O 'N5SN58 § 1 § aoWp� !-' iQ8,=` W= I \p rCpS -a SS 1. INJ J jI yO mI .9aa Ar O:0 u N•'I pO VP IN• a N'IJ N!" NWN _W ...!...C.,00 r_O W 47c i 888 UN 8a ZO q 1..>0. N B N � Im p IVQ W A A4N W N VQWN W e AA03U A 8 Y$ Y Ir Y•8 p IAIO O O 0 0 003 a 0 s la a Ia s� IA' v z 0 d 8 W e S ♦O 8 OI.C3(3) co .a a a o z m w m m. a x x a A o.o.d s > ; C d?c 0 s Pf g o^R 9513- ar r•nra nc o n •e 3'e'� a• S oQ o s n o u O n cr. a E n ma-c'' O O n a s 3 a! '.wZ Q 3 S.• n u. I .LI Amc 3 ne •n'3 o..e *sQ'3 8 e 3 oa.no2 o^ ..1 c e.. Xae.-5R . a �• 1. 2 oo '' v ?• e5.• -X a•. g2 2A" �..,12E.-. , - � n3 �.^yR = C w5waM '�' + IQ 181IQ$ m ' ' a". i si .12., °a =e y a -fin 19 :cw n w ^I - ^. S Y g Io ar. No0 1 - g3a j a `� 32 3 n C i du H W - .+ I_ II W ^-N O ro u..u a-O " A •o 0. N IO I _W INw sJ NN -INw W ! " qW al.e...VN -a e.." A O '003Q7. - AVAOJ N IINMIw w w Wiqpp.4 IA.' iU 0NAN - q - Q g V -0. Q==8 sr 0 0 0 0 it IU V u A V.iv wV W N V sr N JI UUJ-WAN wWOU OOV•Hy '' I JuWW s. n yO O $ u V W N q w q COCO m 0 YpT N N 00 CO O pa) WV VN NA O['fogs' WU1104)'11.0,'aw_JAp a qTwmLNNgNp V3GOo ..u N OWV V N00800 O 000 ,NWWN_ M_w_ p iO.CO q N N.O N N WW m OgA lg wO OO u w g$vW Eg W W _ UV. N.ui __ V01ww WI- NVd A q me',O0I W U yaWWW W yN M 0 N A w O 48 A. aF. pp888gTOa8SN\ 08012 V B .OI S85088813 008 0 yooSOO 000 M§ .§ W ^N O A W W V OO O ., ww UW- WA A J N1. J G O W Na. A N_W N p N W O. NwNOq y w800 dYYN 80000 000 T8 uIG ulvY 0000 00 -01.:4: w00mOS N 888SN0iNNO00 LA W p s - ^o ^ ^ ^ r I_ 4. J q J WMW 4. _ toa AiJuO _ W /IG O N d al0AA :71;1n J-'ill 0 „O u 0 q O.� " N GI O q U8S O 1.. 13., 10 U V b N V�OO000 00 I.O ,p8 O- A VIM4.uit V N .0100q - NQ It0VSNVATQ QOuVN,1y W �J� OOOOvv i I N W ..0 q to W W •-_ p1 O .•,O N ...7.4...1:. O O J A A =1w W 8 WI- -W W V T W.II OD'A N Al A N u -Q §1.1 88 88 8w ...... I W Q O I w 0 q I N ai w w L W �O.-...5.91.-•...1. ...:+$.1.2'"1.1 N O O 1-..N N r 8O r QYU 3 0 O .SII V O.00§0§v v 000 J �J P V�G,I uIL_ta V T Oli W 1.4 00 V COO d 0100000 S 00•`� p I1.. N O'UI N _ +.,0 1 w O N V A A VIW to W W V J J Z N = 8 pp p e. J V 0._�.0_ .10 w.O 0 �O A W N V y w�‘ti". N q N M U I = y 0 8 6 4,„ O O:II 0 U A.O N V . i C GO 1.0 ,CI CI a 8 8 8 $ i$' A JI.O v p"oQ .�. 44 OS UV LI A. N vV0 0 oOG u u wVaW v10G sk1 42\ pp$ N m g L•AOIu 88�pI V.N.§Al I= O m 0 V v O O O S S O O N Nq^N.N N gQSi O CI aN 0 , 0 0 W W Iu m A Jw r. jVaI=U MIb=W N2 4 312 _ _ pp NpNgQW p y Q V Na‘ S S000 S 88a a. y.O O 0 8 A !!00! O C. • O O Q -w 8vaN i�M8Ov b A I VOV A W J" urN08 ON wp8 VNO8ua8.AwGJ- _V V ^ OuO303 e C �.1 14 2 ll I�N ..ppN 000 NW •AO O O 00W UI.OAu Oq V N A yO.J A w w w o- CO - O W �ji U N O wDWu CO W V w0N V NN IQ Y.3 Y n- C880 N J u V N V O8 O8 QV W COAVONw- ON q ipOO NNNO$ W 80 Jq SAI0pNU8 O -wgA O U UwN Jvyvv � _ I3w N OOCO V > V iI^ JV 10 ^• -O 3N O A •.O A. O co L L wISW OI N O a O u Vf..W VA A O COw aa3AQ0,§ O0 N J LA 10 0 - N �vO8O8 0a to QNI,J -I11§OL ANw1uwU U•. JVI8OU 8p�lQ§§aJNNy JNOO _ 00 q`n M^N wCO u 0114, 08�H WW CO QA O a p p =1uIA U IAOIu wNAW wW N-NVWAwgOI>MOWNOwW wNVuiuo_0 N e LI y O8 O8 8 A I It.NNWpV I.IV8 N A Iva O0 IOOMJ N VO§ -§B:NaiiQ§80088 a."vv 001N H Ii.N' NI .O b qI8158 •+ A. 5 VN w CO 1'N 1�IxIA CO IOOA V N A 0 10 ,r. � OwN wpOa S 10I D.0,WN .,0 OS 0 NU.OW'O.11 tit UI; q8 ouWW VO 8 8 $ N . I iN OO wl_p q a.. .04.t. Ob N a 210 0S O g a O b a Y itO . wIVI CO “OINOw _ VO O V O.wIAO ..Nq Oiv.i v00 _ JO a. L I y Mwr_ -+ c. AjNpoato to OU V ab pSS10 � vIV81.2IV itt.'CONJ O WNO. V>W JogO .. QW.p.Na!^3 - pN rat u u 5Z0§28o08U ....1 u `Ii�Iw V ;IwSW v�uauu u -O qLOluq puu WgUa8nU. OVmoa=r.O0000, 122.j II-asp,w OV A ^ Uof a V V O O J q Iq O_IA q �a-V N A N NW N00 W w N q y ^mIN q W WN..q S CO IW A :•A OIN V..0 AW OqAyiwO_§ - AWOOQO O�� vOO OOO-O10110 9- .OA O 1 8N NW1M 8=O O i CO N..0.N Mi0 A N_gN A N SD W0uNS§r uaS3 fOO. iesCCO .I b . N. l� `l lqC8IU.NIAm p0, ,-VW COwWO.-.U.gWa Nwu3O1s1uq.Oaa . U A W owglW voWvVA.1O q Ua O k A r,. IjQvvO8O w 00I1O NIL W 8m AM ..w1OIiAi_u al. 0. q\ �0V O aII N O N J 4.NII00Apv. V N8 Y�O� SOOOgO`Ii�iII IOIS O V O J O O S p IOI IMV It1V N Ao I UINiza1 A aVI W NO O mqOOu .,V m W O NO"u 3pr'§L �- IG N 01. A.- s.Qi;$ o 0 o§ ow �Wi, sI8828 8\ 1E$p -Ig +� 88a8°gI^w `V II ^ I . Igv_-1 !sVWi- = N ,N wl- Nt A J1NIn O - Ou •" N ...481I�, i" :" N a' 435 N L � .o ' MIgIW a.eooAA.o,AaA0 Ie N3 0. n• !22$ h.1.^. I a M V. :O2E 2 0$ •Oi: .+ ^ W N ' 1Niq v, `+ 88'v-,0 a A to I o ;uUj�a !NVtu O N a\.( I =;.1;8 ft u_Uim o N oGAata•i O Om 0100W00.O.O j ru � to _ OO ` iaA V u 3 - •N v^O vO IA gOIgAlet w NqM N > _ N OO NSI8pA VU> - O208 p LV . .Ipq ;WIwO.1;If. ,12, 01 .. 0 'Niwr. v NINNIco� N«0 -JVA8wSIu Ui�^° o ooANoSooAo.I IY N .: 10 _ WaA u V •O IO OI'1M V , IN J N M gA u •.IA v-10.V A NV .-W J M] N1 :p+ OJ O w V I�VU OIq W Y I W w V q A WNA"U.10 UNC A_p0. iW ��oQQ IqAI tivv. IJOO00§ _ IrJlVl.O a- iNI>SS A _ g_jwW Ui00Vw Oi core aqN�00 N-q.0 g`p00 mq0 IO O�gOvZSAs SENT BY: 3-27-98 ; 11:09 ; MN. SENATE 612 784 3462;# 2/ 3 • To: Honorable Keith Langseth From: John D. Hammerschniidt • Course Manager City of Mounds View Issue: National Youth Golf Center Location: Blaine,MN. Resolution: Sponsors-Torn Duffy, Bob Milburt The City of Mounds View is a leader in the metro area youth golf programs. We employ 4 PGA Professionals who give over 1500 youth lessons, administer league play of 1000 rounds, and hold seminars and non-league lessons for another 400 youths. They also are involved in overseeing the use of our facility for 14 different High School teams. Our direct costs after revenue for these programs are over$5000.00 and lost revenue mostly due to discounts is $20,000.00. So as you can see we are dedicated to the advancement of youth • golf and its future.We are NOT against building a Nation Youth Golf Center that would be JUST for the proposed youth uses of the golf facility, but we currently have no assurances that is what this proposal will accomplish. The lack of any attempt to involve the surrounding golf community in this proposal has raised some serious concerns as to what exactly is to be built, what will be the other sources of funding to continue operation of this facility, what assurances that it will always be a YOUTH golf center, and why other alternatives to promote youth golf have not been considered. • Conflicting statements as the very nature of the facility has changed in the last six months. The original thought was to build three nine hole youth courses and has changed to build an eighteen hole championship , a nine hole executive, and a driving range. At first the proposed center was to be affiliated with the national St. Tee program, and now we find there is not an application to be in this program. Although our golf course is less than two miles away from this proposed center,we have never been contacted or asked to provide feedback to this proposal. Under the St. Tee program the evaluation and feedback of area courses is a must before any money for youth golf be considered. Why weren't alternatives considered? The St. Tee program asks that areas be evaluated to see if the area be better served by new facilities or better programs. This area alone has S facilities that could handle 5,000 to 10,000 rounds more of youth golf if the programs were subsidized. Circle Pines,New Brighton, Shoreview, Roseville, and a new 9 hole in Blaine are among those. Other facilities, such as our course could build 3 hole youth corses if capital funds were available. A program structured as the mighty ducks program could serve all of •z.. v KArESA;'E.` GOLF 33/=7/199s 14:20 5. ►�._7E5_144 t . �I U01 ESTII, QrhS ,. " G.1( WI` HROr" s WEIN:TINE {7.-11 5' "c t3:I I. iG:i014. � r- - ?^'r F1 :c �i�i �C95J4 2 MINICI:SCYTA GOLF = sora s�rc or . ocunox arc Of Tat PCA /,y RP ‘,70March 4, 199E �d;��1 // p& p.Erickson,Ex ive Director 1kfirteesou Anse+reur Sports Commission •e 1700-105.AVM,N.F. Blain e,M aneroid S5449-4500 Darr Tam and Ped: Enclosed is out letter confirming the hfi»aa.ots Cof•ssocisoon s end the Mamma Section of the PGA's support of the Menaces Anmaur Sports Camatlasioe's proper jam'golf fuilry tilt"National Youth Golf Cantu')sic the Nasional Sports Center in Blaine.Mreurouh. The continued sacpensiot,otjurrior golf in the Stat.of Minnesotet iia priority oft*MGA a ed the Mamma Sasxion of the P0e. That is wiry the MGA and the Mbaraeeoes Section of the PGA toot fsrtirerd to wonting with the Mambemh Amgen Spero Cateriseiase in n with the National Yam Golf Center. We Wan that junior golf an be signi$aandy expended in the Sawa of Minnesota when the raaourese and woe of the MGA ( e.g., its 400a mambo- • GlIqrses, many of which already conduct junior golf protea; its spr 91,000 1rLGA Aucctsm its eqwrience in naming jttador golf pregsams; and its outreach *sough= the State ofMlmnesote)rind dm hficumeots Seed=of the POA(egg hs MS golf professionals) we eorstlited with rooky to the Nsioral Youth Golf Caw_Th is why the MGA seed the • its Section aims PGA=red the Mumma Amer Sports Commission's iavitzsion to pat pso,in the MASC't"Pseifitiers Com"(to provide iapstt into the desists ceche plf scones so they will be mired for juniors of sat levels of play) and the MAW! "Pro;rtm Computes°(to assist in the lesmulatfon and iatpim, ion*filmier 80Itprograsteq OVUM and including outs=junior golf prom=vats and aonpedtions). However, one palm needs to be made is that the MASC,by mewing arta j 11471411.n: emac eine s void. Thaw ane twaae:re�l ticilties tb. of infrentracnew aim* s wawsher`r � a & uat than State of Miasmata. The may not have beat the cue with mew or hockey. In eddsroe, there are numerous junior golf pogrom non shed throughout the State of hfinnesota. Those junior golf programs are cow for all ages by ramwrous golf sours= (both public and private). ruth gimps, c»acity zoom junior high scboots, high schools trsd other organisations, Although it it (Zook to detrains the ala BMW of jwiors who participate in these pr gsma, we asomata there are I0,000-15,000 juniors who currently pertieipate m 'Mier golf program of same type. 110 CiIrY OF . OLIOS • .nnn Phone: (612) 784-3055 U w Fax: (612)784-3462 • "Quite Simply the Best" • March 27, 1998 Senator Keith Langseth G-24 Capital • St. Paul, MN Re: National Youth Golf Center, Blaine Dear Senator Langseth: • I would like to clarify the comments made in a letter to you from the Mounds.View Bridges Golf Course manager, John Hammerschmidt. While the Mounds View City Council has not taken a formal • position on the National Youth Golf Center, our immediate concerns have simply been that some assurances are taken into consideration that the Golf Center is developed as a youth oriented facility. I agree with my manager that the concept of a youth golf tournament center and training facility is a good one. Our equal concern is that the facility does indeed meet that objective in the future. Paul Erickson of the National Sports Center has contacted me on this and has assured me that a dialogue with Mounds View and.the NSC will be developed on this project. We will be sharing our concerns with Paul as we are with you. However, we wish to be clear that we support the growth of youth golf and a facility that fosters that objective, and will continue to support that as long as that objective is being strived for at the NSC. I will be meeting with Mr. Erickson on the details of his program and address Mounds View's issues with him. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions at 717-4001. Sincerely, du 4"......ejat • Chuck Whiting Mounds View City Administrator •cc: Mounds View Mayor and City Council Mr. Paul Erickson,National Sports Center wna 4t. i iswn.ANKI 2401 Highway 10 • Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 +tee Equal Opportunity Employer xxmemoamw /4 145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 LMC - 411 Laaguoo`Minnasota Cities Phone: (612) 281-1200 • (800) 925-1122 Cities promo ��y 1 � Fax: (612) 281-1299 • TDD (612) 281-1290 March 27, 1998 Dear Clerk,Administrator or Manager: As President of the League of Minnesota Cities,I would like to invite you and the elected and appointed officials in your city to attend the 1998 Annual Conference,June 16-19, in Duluth. Enclosed with this letter is some information about the conference,together with a conference registration form and a housing registration form. Information and the registration form for the family program is also enclosed. Similar information was in the March issue of Minnesota Cities and will be contained in the April issue as well. If those from your city who are planning on attending have not registered,please encourage them to register now. And, if no one from your city is planning on attending, I hope my letter will highlight enough of the important events which are being planned so that officials in your city will consider attending. 0 Please put the topic of attending the League's annual conference on the agenda of your next council meeting,if your city has not already discussed attending this event. There are three purposes for the annual conference: to learn by attending the general sessions and workshops, to learn by interaction with other city officials,and to inspire and re-energize city officials. As you review the enclosed preliminary program,I think you will agree with me that the conference planning committee again did an outstanding job in designing many learning opportunities on important topics. Many of these sessions apply to cities of all sizes,but, in addition to sessions especially focused on the needs of Small Cities,there will be sessions designed for Metro Cities and Greater Minnesota Cities as well. No matter what the size of your city or where it is located,there will be several sessions during which your city officials can learn how to better perform many of their responsibilities. In the exhibit hall, called"Cities Marketplace"about one hundred and fifty providers of goods and services to cities will display what they have to offer. This is a great place to learn about the newest innovations in providing services to citizens and in improving city government. The Leadership Institute for Elected City Officials will continue,with sessions on Conflict • Resolution and The Basics for Elected Officials. III AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 1998 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE Tuesday, June 16 410 6.00 p.m. - dinner 7:00 p.m. - entertainment Evening Kick-Off Spirit Mountain ADMISSION: There is no charge for this event No ticket is needed, however, all who attend this event must be registered delegates and family members Lift Your Spirits at Spirit Mountain!" Enjoy a panoramic view of Duluth from the top of Spirit Mountain. The evening begins with a BBQ dinner including ribs, chicken and hot dogs. Cash bar Your spirits will be uplifted by the Little Black Bear Drum and Dance with a very special performance of Native American ceremonies. Then sit tight for a thrilling story-telling session featuring the League's own ghost story-teller Duke Addicks as he share's special version of"The Spirits of Lake Superior-Who Haunts Here" Wednesday, June 17 5:30-7:30 p.m. City Night in Canal Park 0 . , ADMISSION: $10.00/included in advance registration fee for delegates - City Night tickets can be purchased for family members and guests under"Extra Meal Tickets" on the registration form Enjoy an evening of food, film, and fun! Begin with a feast of"marathon spaghetti" in the DECC's Pioneer Hall - Exhibit area. After dinner, stroll the short distance across the Minnesota Slip Bridge into the Canal Park District for an evening of stress release through relaxation or adventure. Stop at the Grand Slam Adventure World for free ice cream and stay for the fun. Participate in or cheer on the "League of Minnesota Cities Challenge", featuring city officials in friendly competition in mini golf, bumper cars, laser tag and basketball free throw contests. Participation is optional and a special discount card will be available to LMC conferees. Special prizes will be awarded for the best efforts. Visit the Duluth Omnimax Theater for a special showing of"The Living Sea". Shows begin on the hour, every hour from 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. The admission is free for LMC conferees. Complete your evening with a stroll through Canal Park-visit a variety of shops and 0 eateries -walk the Lakewalk and watch the ship traffic and sailboat races. League of Minnesota Cities 1998 Annual Conference maActivities Registration Form Amount Enclosed (Fill in blanks using costs listed in activity Activity Date/Time Number Attending/Price description) William A.Irvin and June 17 adults @$5.50 Lake Superior Maritime 10:00-noon children (3-17) @$4.00 Visitor Center Vista Star Harbor June 17 adults @$14.95 Tour and Lunch 12:15-2:00 children(3-11) @$7.00 Glensheen June 18 adults @$7.00 10:00-noon children(6-11) @$4.00 Lake Superior Zoo June 18 adults @$3.50 10:00-noon children(3-11) @1.50 North Shore Scenic June 18 adults @$7.00 Railroad 12:45-2:30 children(3-13) ®$3.50 Lake Superior June 18 adults @$3.00 Railroad Museum children @$1.50 Total Payment Enclosed $ (Make check payable to:City of Duluth) Mail form and advance registration fees(by May 31,1998) to: Julene Boe Parks&Recreation 12 East 4th Street Duluth,MN 55805 Name Address City/State/Zip Daytime Phone If you require accessible transportation,or have other special needs,please indicate your needs on this form.Advance forms must be received by May 31, 1998.For more information about these activities,please call Julene Boe at(218) 723-3231. •• 17 c n w Is CO CO o Is N 09 Tr N (0 - 00 T r T T 1- T T T LI U1I ant,a^ 41E1 U U I I la I¢ r I / a N u l 11 7t , ;e < � 41) Mt 1 I ,1i - a 'av �y�I ro Y 3 antl gill I yal d a rn cII ti• °� '� d I . I • (• d > 'RS m ro C y S. F- __- l: E - 88 0 _0 0) cc c m -g 4 a plc i aa c - E a1 E o al SI, F. ro m'c a, , e 3 any 4101 #00" J U N N U c 3 O ^.'t O_ O a ` a In .' = x .0 a,3 N _ roma al w � 'c "c w • 'E m p ▪ n m a ro ° a x a S a N la 0- � Y J La 3 o 'o u.• E ''s 'a. 3antl 416 ili E Y Y W . C r_ ;U Nazs , y ppC E ro N p3 C X j t 1 v J co J a 2 Z Z a (n > 'C C`a CL-1 cc l0 to 1.2 m to 5! n m ao 12 :-- co 6 6' Z- 3 antl 418 v fa P. (is • Y G G C7 u. O O ut C7 ♦•♦ a Q I .c 3any 414 - l� a A. 'r ' • C U c C w 0 g U d y LL A r m 14G3ey419 to E o Q N N' d i " of d 0) ro ',72 Y O y�t=-y m Q 1 c rn a > al O O ro o ro ro w 2 c Y 0) --=-. 3anV 41S O C C _ O FSO O N N N q '15• Y_ - co -z c cl c L a) O) Z .1 a a� 05 (9 Y N c S f- 7 ~ Ti 0 U > > N ' 7i "'7 u Q �. a ro 14 x O o OCr) _� U N 3 any 410 4,„oN O c (0 U U c O O ,_ E N 'O 72 Nm- m ro r � w E m c= c O1 c o o`J �� amUUi� D000w9wiiiiu.. S = 2 wv� S• T O T CO CO O CO to !. 03 OD T Ip R R T 3antl WC ici ' 003010 W O 0 Z tO .. X O Y C7 Z J l H 4 J w 3antl PUL Id • 4 t. 4 2e3 t g +▪ 1. e 3anylal I> C =_� 4��a.�j�y� anyaM01 ' any awn o §1 • - :4c e f — Many an .. ,p . -- -..,,,,''.,,..2,,, Cy N -_ a y '� t ,��,` h _�gs N LL �' \ O`t _di �- cy LMany PUL ,;.-. lip- 44444.4 - 7 a a4 ri, _ , _ - t. tis .4... ..9, g F . tJ Y. Many 4I0 _t— ME _l `l' IH Lt,.. l6 .II W1 1 �Vr W�� .- Ma^tl NS ,e 0 \ N T a \�Many 419 r tl a. C t0 b in E 0 07 co O V 9asa o c a E o 0 N O N m E N • 9 ? v N E c 0 0 y E N �l.J el Y Y ' 10 CJ (n E 0 m \ j 01,4 N 3 ro Of 2 y-C: O t a I N 01 . Y c c 3 a f, m • CO J O O. CO CO CO > a - IA t ix � p a I" N M l' 0 OO P 00 co O NP! 7 N 10 H OO r r r w' T T r T r ,03/31/98 13:57 FAX HESSIAN MCKASY 2002/004 STATE OF MINNESOTA III OF REPRESENTATIVES REGULAR SESSION---1998 0 . . - . S.F. NO. 535 DATE - 3-30-98 SPECIAL ORDERS SEQUENCE NO. - 3063 PASSAGE The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage. • The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 82 yeas and 43 nays as follows: • • N Abrams : 0 Johnson, R. : Y Paulsen N Anderson, B. Y Juhnke N Pawlenty Y Anderson, I. : Y Kahn : Y Paymar Y Bakk : Y Kalis : Y Pelowski N Bettermann : Y Kelso : Y Peterson ' Biernat N Kielkucki : Y Pugh Bishop : Y Kinkel : Y Rest 41111 Boudreau 0 Knight : N Reuter • Bradley,, N Knoblach : Y Rhodes Y Broecker : Y Koskinen •N Rifenberg • Y Carlson N Kraus Y Rostberg Y Chaudhary N Krinkie : Y • Rukavina _ O Clark, J. : Y Kubly : ,Y Schumacher Y Clark, K. : Y Kuisle : Y Seagren N Commers : Y Larsen N Seifert N Daggett : Y Leighton : Y Sekhon N Davids : Y Leppik : Y Skare Y Dawkins : Y Lieder : Y Skoglund N Dehler N Lindner : Y Slawik O Delmont : Y Long 0 Smith N Dempsey 0 Luther : Y Solberg Y Dorn N Macklin N Stanek Y Entenza : Y Mahon N Stang N Erhardt : Y Mares N Sviggum N Erickson : Y Mariani : Y Swenson, H. • Y Evans 0 Marko N Sykora Y Farrell : Y McCollum N Tingelstad N Finseth : Y McElroy : Y Tomassoni Y Folliard : Y McGuire N Tompkins , Y Garcia : Y Milbert X Trimble , . O Goodno : ' N Molnau : 0 Tuma Y Greenfield N Mulder : Y Tunheim F Greiling : Y Mullery N Van Dellen Y Gunther : Y Munger : Y Vandeveer Y Haas : Y Murphy : Y Wagenius N Harder N Ness N Weaver Y Hasskamp N Nornes : Y Wejcman Y Hausman : Y Olson, E. : Y - Wenzel IIIII Hilty N Olson, M. N Westfall -- Moisten : Y Opatz : Y Westrom Huntley : Y Orfield : Y winter Y Jaros : Y Osskopp N Wolf Y Jefferson N Osthoff N Workman Y Jennings ; Y Otremba, M. : Y Spk. Carruthers !! ' Johnson, A. : Y Ozment 2 03/31/98 13:57 FAX HESSIAN MCKASY Q003/004 003/004 , 03/26/98 (MOUSE ) CKM/MP RDA-1018 commission's secretary that it considers itself an "affected 2 municipality." The council must at a minimum determine that the 3 commissions 4 (a) providedadequate and timely notice of the proposed 5 proiect to each affected municipality; 6 (b) provided to each affected muniaipal.ity a complete 7 description of the proposed project; 8 (c) provided to each affected municipality notices, 9 agendas, and meeting minutes of all commission meetings, N 10 including advisory committee meetings, at which the proposed 11 project was to be discussed or voted on in order to provide the ' 12 municipalities the opportunity to solicit public comment and 13 participate in the project development on an ongoing basis; and 14 (d) considered the comments of each affected municipality." • 15 Renumber the sections in sequence and correct internal 16 references III Amend the title accordingly • r. y• • MANAGEMENT MEETING MINUTES Wednesday,March 25, 1998 @ 10:00 AM I. Call to Order Meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. Present: Whiting, Ramacher, Saarion, Kessel, Hammerschmidt,Ulrich,Zikmund and Sanchez Absent: Jopke II. Department Reports -Ramacher reported on the table top exercise that MVPD is,' coordinating with Ramsey County. The exercise will take place on April 23 at Silvervew Park. They will notify neighbors by placing a notice in'the paper and some will gettelephone call . Ramacher stated that the department is working on a traffic radar enforcement plan for April and May. Dave Brick passed out emergency plan manuals. Ramacher stated that city::. department heads, police and fire department, along with council members shopld have a disaster rehearsal. Ulrich reported that Ramsey County will recycle all of Spring Lake Read and possibly some deteriorated areas of County Road I. Hammerschmidt reported the the Bridges is open for business. The golf course has seen the best February and March months ever. Hammerschmidt reported that the Hay Evaluation committee has completedevaluating the appeals and has forwarded them onto Chuck Whiting. He stated that all involved have a much better understanding of their positions and the point system. 40 III. Unfinished Business =No Report IV. New Business -Kessel stated that there will be a meeting Tuesday, March 31 at 8:15 in the council chambers for all employees do look at medical and dental insurance options. Whiting stated that Cari Schmidt is the best candidate for the Assistant to the City Administrator Position and will meet with her Wednesday afternoon to discuss the position and have her meet the rest of the employees. V. Adjournment- There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 12:00 p.m. Next meeting is Wednesday, April 1 at 10:00 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Tracy Sanchez, Recording Secretary INFORMATION - 1110 ONLY