Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1996/07/08 NDA � iiiiiiilitY 11111COVINININDRIGRESSIONINE ?ai i;:;fy�:�:,":>;:;;:::; ;:: ;::<'•>'•iiii'�':�?i?Y�Et'i�z> i'2>'k�?'i?s•`<`<'•s Items Discussed Per Consensus 1. Discussion with the Economic Development Commission Members (Cathy Bennett, Economic Development Coordinator) • . 2. Discussion of TIF Proposal for the Development of Building "N" & "K", Mounds View Business Park (Cathy Bennett, Economic Development Coordinator) 3. Consideration of Bronson Dr. Reconstruction Bids (Mike Ulrich, Public Works Director) • t AGENDA - WORK SESSION PAGE TWO JULY 8, 1996 • 4. Consideration of Slurry Seal Bid (Mike Ulrich, Public Works Director) 5. Review of Pleasantview Drive Assessments (Mike Ulrich, Public Works Director) alligifinktaiiliegnentRO �S AND R.ECREr .T 111111111111111:100111111111111 6. Discussion Rea �T a • Carding Higher Fencing for Athletic Fields (Mary Saarion, Parks and Recreation Director) 7. Discussion of Golf Course Sprinkling System (Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) • • AGENDA - WORK SESSION PAGE TWO JULY 8, 1996 4. Consideration of Slurry Seal Bid (Mike Ulrich, Public Works Director) 5. Review of Pleasantview Drive Assessments (Mike Ulrich, Public Works Director) painingenagREMENINGEMENIV 6. Discussion Regarding Higher Fencing for Athletic Fields (Mary Saarion, Parks and • Recreation Director) 7. Discussion of Golf Course Sprinkling System (Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 0 ENDA - WORK SESSION JE THREE Y 8, 1996 i'i'i'''`'»<> ` '> > <'«IBIl>imil sii 8. Discussion of LELS Contract (Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 8. Consideration of Hiring a New Police Officer (Tim Ramacher, Police Chief) III 6,,,,,,,,,er,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,N,,,,,,,,,,,,,m,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,m,,,,,,,,,,,,e,,,,,,,,& lismwolatormiisesill millogimasimoginnoispo QyaniNEMBEVOINESERIBMINNW 9. Discussion of Charter (Bob Long, City Attorney) 10. Discussion Regarding Credit Questions (Bob Long, City Attorney) 0 AGENDA - WORK SESSION PAGE FOUR JULY 8, 1996 • 11. Update on Airport Situation (Bob Long, City Attorney) 12. Consideration of Purchasing Election Equipment (Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 12. Follow-Up Discussion About Roberts and Donatelle's Fire Inspections (Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 1110 13. Discussion of Recycling Collection (Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) • AGENDA- WORK SESSION PAGE FOUR JULY 8, 1996 11. Update on Airport Situation (Bob Long, City Attorney) 12. Consideration of Purchasing Election Equipment (Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 12. Follow-Up Discussion About Roberts and Donatelle's Fire Inspections (Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 13. Discussion of Recycling Collection (Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 's► criN C REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section I STAFF REPORT Report Number: q -)771-Vki 5 BINDSReport Date: 7/2/96 WORK SESSION MEETING DATE W1 July 8. 1996 -re"'Partnetsk'' S Item Description: Discussion with the Economic Development Commission Members Administrator's Review/Recommendation: -No Comments to supplement this report -Comments attached. Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary) Summary: As a result of the June 10th Council Meeting, staff was directed to arrange a joint EDA/EDC meeting. All of the members of the EDC have been invited to the work session to discuss what the EDA's expectations are for actions coming from the EDC and to review the roles and responsibilities of the EDC. I have attached a copy of the Mounds View Municipal Code Section 408 entitled Economic Development Commission and the 1996 EDC work plan. • ect›ou &A,,,A- Economic De elopment Coordinator 408.01 408.04 CHAPTER 408 • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 408.01 Establishment.The Economic Development Commission is hereby established. The Economic Development Commission is referred to herein as the "Commission". 408.02 Purpose. The Commission shall serve as an Advisory Commission to the Economic Development Authority, hereinafter the "Authority", on matters relating to fostering a positive economic climate, encouraging economic development, and enhancing the tax base of the City. The Commission shall also make recommendations to the Authority regarding retention and expansion of existing businesses, attraction of desirable new businesses, redevelopment and rehabilitation opportunities, and other appropriate economic development strategies. 408.03 Composition. Subdivision 1. Appointed Members. Qualification of Members. Terms of Office. The Commission shall be composed of seven (7) equal voting members, including three business representatives and four residents, appointed by the Authority President with the approval of the Authority Board of Commissioners. Members shall have diverse qualifications • with practical experience consisting of, not limited to, but including one of the following areas - economics, finance, accounting, real estate, social services and marketing. Beginning January 1995, three members shall serve a one year term, two members shall serve two year terms and two members shall serve three year terms. Thereafter, members shall serve three year staggered terms, with terms expiring December 31 of each year. At least two of these terms, but not more than three terms shall expire each year. The appointees shall be duly sworn and take • office at the first regular meeting of the Commission in the month of January each year. Both original and successive appointees shall hold their offices until their successors are appointed and qualified(1988 Code, 32.03). Subdivision 2. Designated Members. In addition to appointed membership, one non-voting member shall be designated by the Authority to serve as liaison to the Commission. The term of the appointment.shall ordinarily be for one year, except that they will terminate with the office from which the non-voting appointment is derived. 408.04 Conflict of Interest No person shall be appointed with private or personal interest likely to conflict with the general public interest. If any person appointed shall find that his/her private or personal interests are involved in any matter coming before the Commission, he/she shall disqualify him/herself from taking part in action on the matter; alternatively, he/she may be disqualified by a two-thirds majority vote of the Commissioners in attendance. City of Mounds View 408.05 408.07 408.05 Compensation. Members of the Commission shall serve without • compensation. 408.06 Vacancies. Subdivision 1. Termination of Appointment.Any Commission member desiring . to terminate his/her appointment to the Commissioner before the expiration of his/her term shall give written notification to the Commission Chairperson of his/her intentions. It should be the duty of the Chairperson of the Commission to notify the Authority promptly of any vacancies. The Authority President, with approval of a majority of the Authority Board of Commissioners, shall appoint a new member from applications received for the unfulfilled portion of the term. Subdivision 2. Removal from Office.Any member of the Commission may be removed from office for just cause and on written charges by at least four-fifths of the entire Authority. Such member may be entitled to a public hearing before such a vote is taken. An appointed member may also be removed by the Authority for non-attendance at Commission meetings if a Commissioner is absent from five regularly scheduled meetings per year or from three consecutive meetings, without the consent of the Commission. 408.07 Organization. Meetings. Subdivision 1. Organization. At the first regular meeting of the year, the . Commission shall appoint a chairperson from among its voting members. This appointment shall be subject to Authority approval and shall consist of a one year term. The position of Chair shall rotate among members, with no Commissioner serving in that capacity for more than two consecutive terms. The Commission shall also elect a vice-chair from among its appointed members for a term of one year. The Commission may create and fill such other offices from its members as it may determine to transact Commission business. Subdivision 2. Regular Meetings. The Commission shall hold at least one regular meeting each month at a time which the Commission shall fix by resolution. Subdivision 3. Special Meetings. Special meetings may be called by the Chairperson or by any two members of the Commission by a written notice filed with the Clerk- Administrator who then shall notify all members of the Commission of the time and date of the special meeting, at least three days before the meeting date. Subdivision 4. Quorum. A majority of the appointed voting Commission members shall constitute a quorum. Subdivision 5. Voting Privileges. Each of the appointed members shall have equal voting privileges. • City of Mounds View 408.07 408.09 Subdivision 6. Bylaws. The Commission shall adopt bylaws for its governance and for the transaction of its business. The bylaws will be ---viewed on an annual basis at the first regular meeting in February. . Subdivision 7. Records. A recording rccretary shall keep a record of attendance at Commission meetings, a record of resolutions, and votes and abstentions on each question requiring a vote. The record of the Commission shall be a public record. Subdivision 8. Report. The Authority may request an annual report from the Commission without having received consent of its content by a majority of the Commission members at a regular or special meeting of the Commission. 408.08 Expenditures. The Commission may request from the Authority such funds as may be necessary and proper for the conduct of its duties. 408.09 Duties of the Commission. In order to carry on its purpose, the Commission shall: (1) Confer with and advise the Authority on all matters concerning the industrial and commercial development and redevelopment of the City. (2) Publicize, with the consent of the Authority, the industrial and commercial es and opportunities advantages of the City. (3) Collect data and information as to the type of industries and commerce best suited to the City. (4) Survey the overall condition of the City from the standpoint of determining whether the City has a community climate for industry and to determine the general receptiveness of the City of particular types of industry. (5) Publicize information as to the general advantages of industrial and commercial development and redevelopment in a community. (6) Cooperate with all industries and businesses in the City and in the solution of any community problems which they may have, and to encourage the expansion, development and management of such industries and business so as to promote the general welfare of the City. (7) Coordinate the Economic Development activities of the various groups active in the City. (8) Recommend zoning changes and development of areas suitable for industrial and commercial development and redevelopment to the Planning Commission. • City of Mounds View 408.09 408.09 (9) Develop, compile, coordinate and publicize information such as, but not limited • to the following: a. Existing industrial and commercial concerns within the City, their addresses, types of business, number of employees and whether each serves local, regional or national markets. b. Available industrial and commercial sites including number of acres and square footage, approximate price, existingzoning and proximity to highways. c. Available buildings for industrial and commercial operations, including type of buildings, number of square feet, existing zoning and proximity to highways. d. Transportation facilities, including railroads, motor carriers, water transportation, air transportation and highway facilities that serve the area. e. Electric power available. f. Fuels available for industrial and commercial use. • g• Sewage disposal facilities. h. Water supply facilities. i. Community facilities such as fire,police and educational. j. Recreational facilities. • k. Going wage rate in the City for the trades, skilled and semi-skilled and white collar workers. 1. Availability of labor. m. General community attitude toward industrial and commercial expansion, development, redevelopment and attraction. n. Experience and programs of surrounding communities in regards to industrial and commercial expansion, development, redevelopment and attraction. o. Financial and technical resources available to new and existing businesses • at the local, county, state and national levels for economic expansion and vitality. City of Mounds View 408.09 408.09 (10) Recommend Authority and Planning Commission policies and particular actions in regards to industrial and commercial expansion development, and attraction. redevelopment • (11) Cooperate with and use the services of the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development, Minnesota Housing Finance Authority and any other organizations at the national, state, county and local levels that are deemed conducive to the overall vitality of the City. (12) The Commission shall have the power to appoint task forcesof a size and nature it may deem necessary and may enlist the aid of persons and/or organizations who are not members of the Commission. (13) The Commission shall have no power to make contracts, levy taxes, borrow money or condemn property, but shall have the full power and responsibility to investigate the necessity and recommend the taking of these and any other actions related to the industrial and commercial development and redevelopment by the Authority and all other officers of the City responsible to formulate the terms of and the procedure for taking such action. (14) Review the City's existing housing stock analysis and make recommendations to the Authority regarding mechanisms for the rehabilitation of said housing stock S City of Mounds View ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 1996 WORK PLAN Mission Statement The Economic Development Commission shall serve as an advisory body Development Authority to promote a positive economic climate and revitalize the community by developing programs to retain and expand existing businesses, attract desirable new businesses, and redevelop target areas in the City. Action Steps: • Complete the process of making Mounds View a Star City. • Review and make recommendations to the EDA onand o rams ro enhance business development. p g pportunities to Advocate for an approved Highway 10 Redevelopment Plan as an important element in the positive economic vitality of Mounds View and provide input on the development of the redevelopment plan. • Monitor the development of a Housing Program for Mounds View recognizing link between affordable and life cycle housing and positive economic growth.9 wth Inhe addition, review the use of tax increment financing funds for a Housing Program ensuring that the program meets the requirements of Mounds View's Tax Increment Plan. • • Research innovative programs of other metro area cities as it relates to deveopment, redevelopment and housing rehabilitation. • Monitor the responses and make recommended solutions to the findings of the Phase II North Metro Business Retention and Development Program. • Work cooperatively w„'' the Plann; -.7 Commission in evaluating design standards for new development and - �veloprrent in the City. • Develop and make recon: ends. ns to the Economic Development Authority for a Tax Increment Financir•. Poll include fundability guidelines. • Actively partic:i: ,n rets- , s to local businesses. • Expiore opportunities fc 77.,ovement 0' we puunc rr,-I., ,;. System aPnnp tighway 10. Communicate on a regular basis with the public on the Economic Commission activities, encouraging written or verbal comment, through the City Newsletter, cable and other interactive avenues. CM OF REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section 2- ' STAFF REPORT Report Number: till- 1773W5 ®A(IJV DS Report Date: 7/2/96 WORK SESSION MEETING DATE ilk- iiW July 8. 1996 °d'es,-Partner'" • Item Description: Discussion of TIF Proposal for the Development of Building"N" & "K", Mounds View Business Park Administrator's Review/Recommendation: -No Comments to supplement this report -Comments attached. Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary) Summary: Chuck and I have been working with Everest on proposals for the development of buildings "N" and"K" since April. I have attached all of the written correspondences between Everest and the City since April 5, 1996 when we were first approached by Everest to develop a strategy on the final development of the park and a retention program. What followed was a proposal for the development of Building "N" in addition to a request for a$200,000 grant tied to the this development(proposal dated May 21, 1996). The proposal requested$1.3 pay-as-you- evenue bond over 15 tax increment years with an interest rate of 7% and a 90/10 split. This proposal is approximately $4.28 per sq.ft. of assistance. After reviewing the proposal with Chuck and bond orney Jim O'Meara a counter proposal was submitted offering an 8-year pay-as-you-go agreement at 7% interest which equaled approximately $2.75 per sq. ft. of assistance plus the willingness to negotiation on a low interest loan with the company that was tied to the agreement rather than a grant (letter dated June 3, 1996). Everest responded that the project would not proceed under the City's counter proposal and suggested that we provide them with approximately $435,000 from excess tax increment up front plus a pay-as-you-go note that would equal $850,000 (letter dated June 3, 1996). Staff and O'Meara met with Everest to discuss this proposal and it was recommended that Everest make a proposal that would tie in the Building "K" development as a package. On June 24, 1996 staff again met with Everest to discuss a combined proposal for Building "N" and"K". The combined proposal requested a 13-year pay-as-you-go revenue note at 7% interest for a total request of $1.8 million in assistance. This proposal equals $3.36 per sq.ft. of assistance plus the City's cost in acquiring the additional three properties which we estimated to cost $350,000. In response, the City ran some of our own numbers through Springstead and came up with an alternate proposal for separate Building "N" and "K"developments and combined developments. These figures are outlined in the City's letter dated July 1, 1996. Chuck will be meeting with verest later this week to further discuss the most recent offer. 0 4,14-- Cathy Bennett con. Dev. Coordinator\EDA Director • Page Two Staff Report for Work Session 7/8/96 History: • Staff's response to Everest's proposals have been based on the history of negotiations on Building "N"and previous pay-as-you-go agreements. In 1993 Everest proposed$900,000 of TIF assistance over 13 years at 9% interest with a 90\10 split. This was in response to a company that was willing to lease 70 percent of the facility from Everest. There was no information provided to the EDA with regards to the proposed tenant. Everest was willing to reduce the duration of the agreement from 13 to 10 years. The City made a counter proposal to provide Everest with$1.80 per square foot or a total of$450,192 for 5-7 years at 7% interest with an 85\15 split. Everest was willing to accept$1.75 per square foot or a total of$450,000 for 11-12 years at 8.5% interest. There was no agreement on the negotiations and therefore the project did not proceed in 1993. Everest informed the City that due to the lack of TIF the proposed tenant had elected to locate elsewhere. In 1994, discussions were open again for the development of Building N due to Everest's negotiations with a "mystery company". The proposal, which was done by Casserly, Molzahn&Associates,requested$808,441 for 9 years at 7% interest at an 85\15 split. Through these negotiations,the EDA made informal decisions with regards to parameters for use of TIF. Those parameters included the City's desire to use TIF for an owner occupied building verses a leased facility. The EDA did note that they would consider a long term leased project(for at least the duration of the TIF agreement) if the EDA had prior knowledge of the company prior to signing an agreement. Again,this proposal did not proceed as the"mystery company"never materialized. Considerations: Everest's argument for the amount of TIF needed is based upon their assessment of the competition in the market 111 place. I have discussed some of their examples with several Cities and in all cases the circumstances are very unrelated due to severe soil contamination and clean up costs. The EDA should reflect on how badly you would like the development to proceed and what you are willing to provide them to make that happen. I will be out of the office on Friday but can discuss the procedure in further detail anytime Monday prior to the meeting. Everest may be in attendance at Monday's meeting to make their request to the EDA directly. 1 • EVEREST DEVELOPMENT LTD A MEMBER OF THE EVEREST GROUP LTD ,y �Q April 5, 1996 `� v""'" c ".j VIA FACSIMILE AND REGULAR MAIL Cathy Bennett, Economic Development Coordinator CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Fax#784-3462 • Re: MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK Dear Cathy: We would like to meet with the Mounds View EDA at the earliest opportunity to discuss the proposals concerning Mounds View Business Park which we set forth in our letter of March 29th. I will personally be out of the office from Monday, April 8, through Monday, April 15. In the interim, if you have a date in mind when we could meet with the EDA, please call my colleague, Rob Davidson, at 636-5500. If you would prefer that we meet first with you and other staff to discuss the proposals, please advice. Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, EVEREST DEVELOPMENT, LTD. othy J. Nelson • TJN:Ic ?635Lcng .iKe.;:cca `'6'1. 63633.C.': A EVEREST DEVELOPMENT LTD �„if V18FR!)1If'% `I KV.1r,;(>_; !_ri) March 29, 1996 Cathy Bennett, Economic Development Coordinator MOUNDS VIEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 RE: MOUNDS VTFW BUSINESS PARK Dear Cathy and EDA Members: I am writing on behalf of Everest Development, LTD., developer of Mounds View Business Park, and at the request of City officials, to indicate our desire and offer a Proposal to expand and complete the business park and to establish a business retention program to encourage existing companies within the business park to remain and expand in Mounds View. We offer the proposal set forth below, in the hope and expectation that • share with Everest the mutual goals of completing the businesspark and keepinga tdto realize the benefits of increased tax base and employment, strong, er contributions to the City's excess TIF funds, and the secondary economic benefits such as increased consumer spending for goods and services within Mounds View. Before outlining our proposals, some historical perspective on the development of Mounds View Business Park may be in order. In 1988, Everest entered into a development agreement with the City, in which the City agreed to provide tax increment financing assistance in exchange for Everest's commitment to construct at least 613,000 square feet of development within a three year period, with a guaranteed minimum assessed value of at least $19,500,000. We believe this was a commitment no other developer in the Twin Cities would have undertaken at the time. Construction of the first phase of Mounds View Business Park started in early 1988, and within approximately 24 months, Everest completed development of over 650,000 square feet of office/industrial space with tax values exceeding the guaranteed minimums. With the exception of a build-to-suit sale to Multi-Tech Systems, all of the space in the first phase of Mounds View Business Park was leased space which attracted such quality tenants as Baker's Square, Onan, Pharmacia Deltec, Owens & Minor, Firstar Data Processing, and Liberty Check Printers. • 2665 Long Lake Road Suite 330 • Roseville,MN 55113 X17;hlF-SSM `Fiji Cathy Bennett City of Mounds View Page 2 In September, 1989, Everest entered into an additional development agreement under which the City provided tax increment financing in connection with the development of three buildings totaling 264,000 square feet in Mounds View Business Park South, with Everest guaranteeing a minimum assessed value of$7,400,000. Between 1990 and 1992, Everest completed the three buildings in Mounds View South and leased them to such tenants such as Medtronic, Mounds View School District, U.S. Geological Survey, First Team Sports, Garment Graphics, and Liberty Check Printers. The buildings in Mounds View South took longer to lease because they were built during a period of economic downturn and severe real estate recession. Everest honored the terms of its development agreement by building the buildings with internal financing at a time when mortgage financing was non-existent, and then sat x;+ _4, •r a = A T ' In June of 1994, Everest finalized pay-as-you-go TIF assistance agreements for the C. G. Hill project and the Multi-Tech Systems expansion project. Both of these owner-occupied projects were completed as anticipated by January, 1995, contributing $3,000,000 of additional tax base to the City of Mounds View. In 1993 and again in 1994, Everest submitted tax increment financing proposals for the development of Building N, a 103,000 square foot office/industrial building proposed for a 6.89 acre site on Program Avenue, east of the Mounds View Inn motel and south of the Clinch-On • Products building. Although Everest and the EDA discussed and explored potential terms of a pay-as-you-go TIF assistance package for Building N, the EDA elected not to finalize a development assistance agreement until a company acceptable to the EDA was secured in advance to be an owner/occupant or, at least, an anchor tenant for the project. Without a building in the ground and a development assistance agreement in place, we have been unable to secure an advance commitment from a company for this project. We believe the decision of the EDA not to finalize a tax increment agreement for Building N was a serious and wasteful error which has deprived the City of tax base and employment, and has opened the door for other nearby communities to benefit by landing tenants who could have located in Mounds View. BUILDING 'N' PROPOSAL We request that the EDA reconsider its position concerning the Building N project by proceeding to finalize an appropriate pay-as-you-go development assistance agreement to reimburse TIF- eligible project costs. In exchange, we will agree to commence project construction in 1996 with completion by 1997. With a development assistance agreement in place, we are willing to guarantee construction of the project and are 100% confident that we will attract a desirable company or companies to occupy the building as an owner or tenant(s), just as we have done successfully on the existing 1,100,000 square feet of space in the business park, and on every other project we have developed. We are prepared to discuss the particulars of a development assistance agreement for the Building N project with the EDA and/or its representatives at your • earliest convenience. Cathy Bennett City of Mounds View Page 3 111 MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK SOUTH - EXPANSION PROPOSAL Everest currently owns approximately 3.9 acres of property and a single-family reg„ _ on the south side of Highway 10, north of Woodale Drive. Adjacent to the ,er -owned parcels are three (3) single-family residential properties at 2280, 2288, and " ..ighway 10. Enclosed is a map which depicts these properties. Acquisition of the thr- asp' .,;ent residential properties, together with the Everest-owned parcels, would permit .,m' ;ge of an overall redevelopment site of approximately 5.9 acres of land area. We belie' His .e would be suitable and appropriate for the development of "Building K", an rice ?ustrial building of approximately 65,000-80,000 square feet, as an expansion of Mounr1 Business Park South. Such a Building K would complete the pie.•, ' ,•,t of Moi View :Hess Park at the fourth and final corner of the Highway 10/Woodale Drive intersection ver the past several years, Everest has suggested on a number of occasions teed for s; , City to take affirmative steps to acquire these properties to continue with busine .k (ley( pment. To date, these suggestions have not been pursued. We propose that the EDA acquire, for reconveyance t r erest, the three residential properties at \ 2280, 2288, and 2300 Highway 10, utilizing a portio.:. _ the excess TIF funds that have been and �( continue to be generated by Mounds View Business Park. If the EDA assists in acquiring this site, Everest will commit to develop it. We are aware that the City and the EDA have plans to • ize some of its a cess TIF funds to encourage and facilitate other Highway 10 redevelopment • , projects. In our view, the opportunity to develop another high quality office/industrial facility of substantial size, adding to the critical mass of the business park, should qualify for high prioritization among the potential Highway 10 projects. The more employment base created in (\!, Mounds View Business Park, the greater demand should be for goods and services within the community, enhancing the feasibility of other development and redevelopment projects along the fi Highway 10 corridor. BUSINESS RETENTION GRANT PROGRAM We believe it is important to the long-term success and vitality of Mounds View Business Park that the City/EDA develop an aggressive business retention program to maximize the opportunities to keep business park tenants in Mounds View and/or to attract quality new tenants to replace those that may leave for perceived "greener pastures". Whether we like it or not, the business of economic development is competitive between and among communities. There are several north suburban communities with a variety of incentive programs designed to lure companies, including Mounds View Business Park companies, to relocate to their communities. Free land, forgivable loans, fast-track approvals, and use of eminent domain to acquire development sites, are among the tools and incentives being used by a number of communities to aggressively attract industry. Not surprisingly, many of the best and most desirable companies actively search for and solicit available economic development incentives as they consider relocation versus renewal of an existing lease. 1111 - Cathy Bennett City of Mounds View Page 4 • As a concrete and specific example of the above-described phenomena, in late 1994, Everest attempted to attract Computype, Inc., a Roseville company involved in the bar code label printing business, to be an owner/occupant or anchor/tenant for the Building N project. After an extensive and competitive site search process, Computype officials informed us that our proposal to relocate the company to Mounds View Business Park was attractive and had been selected as its first choice, that is, until the City of Roseville offered and provided to Computype a $700,000 forgivable loan to remain in Roseville. Roseville retained a growing high-tech company and the Building N site remained vacant. To keep and attract desirable companies in Mounds View B,,,:-.--: 11 ' `_ _ __ .. establish a ousiness retention grant prc +o... .., � . ,.,,y;;. , tax ;as or equipri, purchases, tenant improvements, remodeling costs, etc., with grant amounts keyed to the size of the company, number of' employees, and some measure of documented company growth and expansion. The business retention program could be funded from a portion of the excess tax increment funds being generated by Mounds View Business Park. A City strategy and policy of keeping Mounds View Business Park strong and well-occupied, and the availability of appropriate tools to implement that policy, would seem to be a prudent way for the City/EDA to preserve and maintain the success of the business park and all the benefits which flow from that success, which in turn should have multiplier effects for the economic health and vitality of the Highway 10 corridor and the community of Mounds View as a whole. We look forward to the opportunity to discuss the foregoing proposals with you in the near future. Sincerely, EVEREST DEVELOPMENT, LTD. -7-14A—' imothy J. Nelson TJN/cm Smvpropsl/daily 3/29/96 THE EVEREST GROUP LTD • llitay. L i, I Chuck Whiting Clerk-Administrator CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 Cathy Bennett Economic Development Coordinator CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 • Re: MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK - BUILDING N REQUEST FOR TIF ASSISTANCE Dear Chuck and Cathy: The Everest Group ("Everest") proposes the construction of "Building N", an approximate 103,000 SF office/warehouse/manufacturing facility on approximately 6.89 acres (300,038 SF) of land located on Program Avenue adjacent to the east of the C.G. Hill & Sons facility, the Mounds View Inn Motel, and McDonald's Restaurant. Everest requests that the City of Mounds View (the "City") provide pay-as-you go TIF assistance in connection with the development of Building N. Participation in the Building N project presents a two-fold opportunity for the City and Everest - the opportunity to attract a substantial new company to Mounds View Business Park, and the opportunity to retain an important existing Mounds View company within the Business Park. • 2665 Long Lake Road Suite 330 • Roseville,MN 55113 (612)636-5500 Fax:(612)636-0183 r - 4k 1 b"--P ki-j&C° 1 �` ei 0* Co — /Y rct --3 z/n--) (--h a' .61�a:. • I Page Two 6- i A ,£ 1 May 21, 1996 ir ' 5'-f_i ,N,r) . Everest is currently negotiating with a Twin Cities company ("Company A") to locate a substantial new facility requirement within an existing building in Mounds View Business Park. Company A's/facility need is of a size that would involve both existing vacant space in Mounds View Business Park and existing occupied space, requiring the relocation of an existing Mounds View Business Park tenant ("Company B") to create a contiguous space large enough to meet Company A's requirements. I 31J 1. Everest proposes to relocate Company B to new leased space within Building N Y by canceling Company B's existing lease and negotiating a new longer term lease for Building N. Unless Company B can be relocated to Building N, t1/ ' Company A's facility requirement cannot be met, and Company A will go jk elsewhere. To relocate from its existing space into Building N, Company B will c incur significant costs of relocation for moving expenses, racking systems and ) other equipment. J .v Everest acquired and assembled the four parcels of land which make up the • Building N site over the period 1987 to 1990, and has now held the property for - up to nine (9) years as an industrial development site to compliment the existing development in Mounds View Business Park. Provided that a development agreement can be finalized expeditiously, construction of the project would occur in 1996, with substantial completion by January 2, 1997, for taxes payable in 1998. Upon completion, the estimated market value of the facility would be approximately $2,910,790, with an estimated tax capacity of $133,896. ` Projected property taxes are calculated at $183,369 per year, compared to current taxes of $32,420 per year on the undeveloped land. The estimated total project cost for Building N is approximately $4,365,000, including $1,200,000 in site acquisition and carrying costs already incurred, approximately $590,000 in site improvements and public improvements, and $2,575,000 in building construction cost. Pay-as-you-go tax increment r',-,!,,,,,,,, assistance is requested to reimburse a portion of site acquisition, site \,` >_mprovement and public improvement costs already incurred or to be incurred by -? e developer. ‘'`i' The TIF assistance requested is through a Revenue Note in the ;iii q g principal fit) amount of $1,285,334 payable over fifteen (15) tax increment years at a simple 40.,,i+.r" interest rate of seven (7%) percent. After application of the pay-as-you-go TIF principal amount, Everest would still have an unreimbursed investment in the BuildingN site of approximately or $1.68per square pp y $505,000, foot of land area. J l .. Z v Page Three May 21, 1996 . Company B has indicated it cannot justify the proposed relocation to Building N unless a source of funds is available to defray approximately $300,000 of its relocation costs. Accordingly, in addition to the pay-as-you-go TIF assistance described above, Everest requests that the City provide a grant of $200,000 to Company B out of the City's excess tax increment funds, to be utilized to defra Company B's moving expenses, racking and equipment costs, to supplement contribution of $100,000 toward Company B's moving expenses from Company B's current building owner/landlord. Attached are the following three schedules: 1. Schedule A - cash flow analysis, including assumptions; 2. Schedule B - proposed form of revenue note; 3. Schedule C - estimated site and public improvements costs. SCHEDULE A The assumptions for Schedule A are listed on the second and include the following: page of that schedule 1. The original market value and original tax capacity (based on the payable 1996 values per Ramsey County) are $507,800 and $23,359, respectively. 2. The estimated market value of the building assumes a market value of $23.33 per square foot for 103,000 SF. Combining this building market value of $2,402,990 with the land market value of $507,800, generates a total estimated market value upon completion of $2,910,790. Based on current class rates, this market value converts into an estimated tax capacity of$133,896. 3. Assuming the current pay 1996 tax rate of 1.36949, this estimated tax capacity will generate real estate taxes of $183,369 or $1.78 per square foot of building. 4. During the term of the Revenue Note, the City would retain 10% of the tax increment generated for Administrative/Development Program Expenses and apply the remaining 90% to the Revenue Note. • • Page Four May 21, 1996 SCHEDULE B This Schedule illustrates the form of a Revenue Note. The proposed Revenue Note has a principal amount of $1,285,334, payable over fifteen (15) tax increment years at 7% simple interest. The Revenue Note, dated as of 8/1/96, is payable semi-annually, with the first payment on 8/1/98 and the final payment on 2/1/2013. SCHEDULE C This schedule sets forth the estimated site improvement and public improvement costs Everest expects to incur to develop the project. Please note that in addition to installation of water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer service to the 1111 property, the public improvements include the reconstruction/improvement of a portion of Program Avenue adjacent to the Building N site, where the pavement is currently substandard and curbing nonexistent or in poor repair. The foregoing proposal presents an opportunity for Everest and the City to retain and attract successful companies to the Mounds View business community, and to take another step toward completion of Mounds View Business Park. Time is ,' of the essence in our negotiations with the tenant prospects described above. We look forward to discussing this proposal with you and the EDA at the earlie opportunity. Sincerely, 31/4.; Y THE EVEREST GROUP, LTD {.t-1" Timothy J. Nelson TJN:lc � • mvlet596 1 i.J L . SCHEDULE A (CONTINUED) 411 Mounds View Building N Site TIF Projections for completion of construction by 12/31/96 05/21/96 Original Market Value and Tax Capacity Square Feet of Land 300,038 Value/square foot $1.6925 Market Value of Land Before Improvements 507,800 (Pay 1996) 4.60% Original Tax Capacity 23,359 Estimated Market Value and Tax Capacity After Improvements Land Value 507,800 Building Square Feet 103,000 $23.33 Building Value 2,402,990 2,402,990 Estimated Market Value After Improvements 2,910,790 4.60% Estimated Tax Capacity After Improvements 133,896 Construction 1996 Valuation 1997 Taxes Payable 1998 Property tax rate for taxes payable in 1996 1.36949 Assumed annual inflation 2.00% Admin Fees 10.00% Interest Rate of Revenue Note 7.00% Date Revenue Note Begins to Accrue Interest 08/01/96 4111 SCHEDULE A 0 THE EVEREST GROUP/CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW BUILDING "N" Cash Projection Increment Tax Payment Original Estimated Estimated Less Available Increment Date Years Tax Capacity Tax Capacity Tax Increment Admin Fees Tax Increment Years 08/01/96 23,359 23,359 0 0 02/01/97 23,359 133,896 0 0 08/01/97 23,359 133,896 0 0 02/01/98 0.0 23,359 136,574 75,690 0 0.0 08/01/98 0.5 23,359 136,574 75,690 7,569 68,121 0.5 02/01/99 1.0 23,359 139,305 77,523 7,569 68,121 1.0 08/01/99 1.5 23,359 139,305 77,523 7,752 69,771 1.5 02/01/2000 2.0 23,359 142,092 79,394 7,752 69,771 2.0 08/01/2000 2.5 23,359 142,092 79,394 7,939 71,454 2.5 02/01/2001 3.0 23,359 144,933 81,301 7,939 71,454 3.0 08/01/2001 3.5 23,359 144,933 81,301 8,130 73,171 3.5 02/01/2002 4.0 23,359 147,832 83,247 8,130 73,171 4.0 08/01/2002 4.5 23,359 147,832 83,247 8,325 74,923 4.5 02/01/2003 5.0 23,359 150,789 85,232 8,325 74,923 5.0 08/01/2003 5.5 23,359 150,789 85,232 8,523 76,709 5.5 02/01/2004 6.0 23,359 153,804 87,257 8,523 76,709 6.0 08/01/2004 6.5 23,359 153,804 87,257 8,726 78,5316.5 0 1/2005 7.0 23,359 156,881 89,322 8,726 78,531 1� 7.0 005 7.5 23,359 156,881 89,322 8,932 80,390 %kr 7.5 006 8.0 23,359 160,018 91,428 8,932 80,390 t ' 8.0 08/01/2006 8.5 23,359 160,018 91,428 9,143 82,285 8.5 02/01/2007 9.0 23,359 163,218 93,577 9,143 82,285 9.0 08/01/2007 - 9.5 23,359 163,218 93,577 9,358 84,219 9.5 02/01/2008 10.0 23,359 166,483 95,768 9,358 84,219 10.0 08/01/2008 10.5 23,359 166,483 95,768 9,577 86,191 10.5 02/01/2009 11.0 23,359 169,813 . 98,003 9,577 86,191 11.0 08/01/2009 11.5 23,359 169,813 98,003 9,800 88,203 11.5 02/01/2010 12.0 23,359 173,209 100,283 9,800 88,203 12.0 08/01/2010 12.5 23,359 173,209 100,283 10,028 90,255 12.5 02/01/2011 13.0 23,359 176,673 102,609 10,028 90,255 13.0 08/01/2011 13.5 23,359 176,673 102,609 10,261 92,348 13.5 02/01/2012 14.0 23,359 180,206 104,981 10,261 92,348 14.0 08/01/2012 14.5 23,359 180,206 104,981 10,498 94,483 14.5 02/01/2013 15.0 N/A N/A N/A 10,498 94,483 15.0 2,691,232 269,123 2,422,109 • SCHEDULE B THE EVEREST GROUP/CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ill Principal $1,285,334 Interest Rate 7.00% Date of Note 08/01/96 Payment Beginning Accrued Current Total Interest Principal Ending Date Balance Inte st Interest J) Payment Portion Portion Balance 08/01/96 1,285,334 44,987Y� 0 1,285,334 02/01/97 1,285,334 44,987 p 0 1,285,334 08/01/97 1,285,334 44,987 5'\ 0 1,285,334 02/01/98 1,285,334 44,987 0 1,285,334 08/01/98 1,285,334 - 1 44,987 68,121 68,121 0 1,285,334 02/01/99 1,285,334 c 44,987 68,121 68,121 0 1,285,334 08/01/99 1,285,334 44,987 69,771 69,771 0 1,285,334 02/01/2000 1,285,334 44,987 69,771 69,771 0 1,285,334 08/01/2000 1,285,334 44,987 71,454 71,454 0 1,285,334 02/01/2001 1,285,334 44,987 71,454 71,454 0 1,285,334 08/01/2001 1,285,334 44,987 73,171 73,171 0 1,285,334 02/01/2002 1,285,334 44,987 73,171 47,977 25,194 1,260,140 08/01/2002 1,260,140 44,105 74,923 44,105 30,818 1,229,322 02/01/2003 1,229,322 43,026 74,923 43,026 31,896 1,197,425 08/01/2003 1,197,425 41,910 76,709 41,910 34,799 1,162,626 02/01/2004 1,162,626 40,692 76,709 40,692 36,017 1,126,6 08/01/2004 1,126,609 39,431 78,531 39,431 39,100 1,087, 02/01/2005 1,087,509 38,063 78,531 38,063 40,468 1,047,0 08/01/2005 1,047,041 36,646 80,390 36,646 43,743 1,003,298 02/01/2006 1,003,298 35,115 80,390 35,115 45,274 958,024 08/01/2006 958,024 33,531 82,285 33,531 48,755 909,269 02/01/2007 909,269 31,824 82,285 31,824 50,461 858,808 08/01/2007 858,808 30,058 84,219 30,058 54,161 804,647 02/01/2008 804,647 28,163 84,219 28,163 56,056 748,591 08/01/2008 748,591 26,201 86,191 26,201 59,991 688,601 02/01/2009 688,601 24,101 86,191 24,101 62,090 626,510 08/01/2009 626,510 21,928 88,203 21,928 66,275 560,235 02/01/2010 560,235 19,608 88,203 19,608 68,595 491,640 08/01/2010 491,640 17,207 90,255 17,207 73,048 418,593 02/01/2011 418,593 14,651 90,255 14,651 75,604 342,989 08/01/2011 342,989 12,005 92,348 12,005 80,343 262,645 02/01/2012 262,645 9,193 92,348 9,193 83,155 179,490 08/01/2012 179,490 6,282 94,483 6,282 88,201 91,289 02/01/2013 91,289 -k_ 3,195 3,195 09t;2 9_z 0 179,947 956,829 2,422,109 1,136,776 1,285,334 5 1 40 ��t�� • EVEREST CONSTRUCTION comp , y_tRE i)F THE F' )('I'L(1) May 17, 1996 SCHEDULE C MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK BUILDING N SITE AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ITEM $ 1. Clearing, Excavation, Erosion Control $75,000.00 2. Ponding with Clay Liner 10,000.00 3. Retaining Walls 0 70,000.00 4. Soil Corrections 50,000.00 5. Watermains and Hydrants 55,000.00 6. Sanitary Sewers 15,000.00 • 7. Storm Sewer System 55,000.00 8. Driveway Aprons and Curbing 12,000.00 9. Paving Base 56,000.00 10. Street Lighting 7,000.00 11. Landscaping 45,000.00 12. Irrigation 20,000.00 13. Program Avenue (paving and curb) 25,000.00 14. Soil Reports/Surveys 6,000.00 15. Architectural/Engineering Fees 10,000.00 16. Soils Testing/Location Surveys 10,000.00 17. Permits 10,000.00 18. Supervision, General Conditions 20,000.00 7 110 19. Overhead and Fee39,000.00 4S-(0 ( TOTAL $590,000.00 -\-t1Ja - -\ I : . V �N N Of ^h!' _ ` 't\9 ti Gam'?Q •\ 02) �: .. 62 �� 2 . 98 0c. .�N 1 a •`,2 POE SMT P1NGi, 3 / • pc j 2.50-c. • �••4 oz e • MW `i _ io itin Poc 02so9373 Z . Li i'S l'-,• EVgg-g5T— (4 . .5GT. N. oz... 60 /S y 30 ia1 _ ,(G..5) , 05) • - a ( , B X • • (GC) • V �, t t 7 6 do 1 . I EVE CS CG?) °W 03) 1 7 a rs �5) 210,98_ q�q �'0 • tf c !� ,. M Doc*Zg4."%,%E. (siri WOOOALE DRIVEAbbo, _ _ ,T DOC ¢2<,10302 �,r _ ..._ ----4.----- 4.' - 4-1770 Z.r -27:7 / / \\ 6‘I\ , .\ . , - i 249. 95 \N ` • N i . MOUNDS VIEW II ciiII eni 1 ( 1G) , 1 1 2 Ii A I— 756. 24 (f 9.58 .s9) -t 1BUSINESS - P ARK / / 1 11 1 A-L.,. Ors vgaije.4 V(411? iT SI 1-- -- - - - — — — — — ' - III.- — — - — — — - — - - � — - — - i - - — =--T • CITY OF CMOS 4101111F-0EW Phone: (612) 784-3055 •AFax: (612)784-3462 S ° e:: • Panne- June 3, 1996 Mr. Timothy Nelson The Everest Group, LTD 2665 Long Lake Road, Suite 330 Roseville,MN 55113 Dear.Tim: Chuck and I reviewed your request for a pay-as-you-go tax increment financing assistance proposal for Building"N" in Mounds View Business Park. The request includes $1,235,334 present value revenue note which equates to approximately$4.28 per square foot of assistance on the project. The term of the proposal is 15 years at 7% interest rate. At the EDA work session on April 29, 1995, we were directed to encourage a proposal for Building"N"and negotiate terms of the agreement prior to bringing an equitable tax increment package to the EDA for review. After careful iew with the EDA's fiscal and bond attorney's I would like to make an alternate proposal which, in my opinion, e EDA Board members would be more susceptible to: The proposal:includes an eight year, 7% interest rate pay-as-you-go agreement which would equal approximately $2.75 per square foot of assistance. This is more in line with the pay-as-you-go agreements the EDA has approved in the past. In regards to the proposed$200,000 grant to "Company B"I would propose a very desirable low interest rate loan with the company over a term not to exceed their lease agreement to finance the new equipment and racking systems. At this time we are not interested in setting a precedence of providing grants but would be willing to review a favorable loan agreement. The City of Mounds View's EDA is very interested in working with The Everest Group to see the completion of the very successful business park. If these terms are agreeable I would be willing to arrange for a special work session prior to either of the regular meetings in June. Please contact me with questions or comments at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, 71 • Cathy Binnett Executive Director cc: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator �C-+uT a""T *....• crt.. "' 2401 Highway 10 • Mounds View. MN 555112-iaoq (5) THE EVEREST GROUP LTD • June 3, 1996 VIA FACSIMILE (784-3462) AND REGULAR MAIL Cathy Bennett EDA Executive Director CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW____. 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 Dear Cathy: Thank you for your letter dated June 3 responding to our proposal for pay-as- you-go tax increment financing for Building N in Mounds View Business Park. We have reviewed with our investor the alternate proposal you suggested for an 8-year pay-as-you-go TIF financing package and are writing to inform you that11111 the Building N project would not proceed under the alternate TIF proposal as it would leave far too high a level of TIF-eligible but unreimbursed project costs. Our proposal was prepared and submitted after careful consideration of project costs and the economics necessary to meet the requirements of Companies A and B, as described in our 5-21-96 proposal letter. A quick analysis shows land acquisition and site costs totalling $5.97 per square foot in the Building N site. Your proposed level of TIF financing would only bring this cost down to $3.22 per square foot, an uncompetitive site cost to support industrial development, especially considering that several competing communities are offering free land or full land write-downs to encourage industrial development. Quite simply, we are unable to attract the kind of industrial owner/occupants or tenants desired by the City and the developer without a competitive economic development package. The lack of a competitive economic development package is why this site has remained undeveloped for 9 years. We will continue to work with you and Chuck Whiting in an effort to explore other opportunities to complete the Business Park and keep it strong. • 2665 Long Lake Road Suite 330 • Roseville,MN 55113 (612)636-5500 Fax:(612)636-0183 Page Two CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW An alternative the EDA might consider to facilitate the development of the Building N project would be to blend a pay-as-you-go TIF revenue note approach with up-front reimbursement of certain project costs from the City's excess increment funds (e.g. $850,000 under a pay-as-you-go revenue note, and $435,000 from excess TIF funds). We can assure you that the Building N project will not proceed without the level of TIF commitment set forth in our initial proposal letter. Accordingly, we respectfully request that you reconsider our May 21 proposal for pay-as-you-go TIF assistance, or consider the possibility of blending pay-as- you-go and up-front TIF financing as briefly outlined above. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, THE EVEREST GROUP, LTD Timothy J. Nelson TJN:Ic cc: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator • BUILDINGS "K" AND "N" MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK y'\P TIF PROPOSAL SUMMARY ►'� L _ C ,, TIF - ELIGIBLE COSTSCi Building K: J Acquisition Costs: $ 278,000 - Site Development Costs: $ 470 000 C'' SfSt �� Ac/I)J34„-L, (c am L ✓t 4 �,� �� � S',) Tr2 / _ -fn`') j $ 748,000 cam ' . .,u 'Lc%) Building N: 011,111m����� Acquisition Costs: $1,201,500 c ' , 5-60, ��J > Site Development Costs: $ 590,000 $1,791,500 ccs: '" Total Costs: $2,539,500 Pay-as-you-go Revenue Note TIF Assistance: (Terms: 13-years, 7% interest, 10% to Admin) Building K: $ 676,383 Building N: $1,156,796 Total TIE Reimbursement: $1,833,179 Developer's Unreimbursed Costs: $ 706,321 TIFK&N(p)6/96 l� '5kkK k 1103 SCHEDULE A (CONTINUED) . Mounds View Building K Site TIF Projections for completion of construction by 12/31/97 06/21/96 Original Market Value and Tax Capacity Square Feet of Land 245,296 Value/square foot $1.5039 Market Value of Land Before Improvements 368,900 (Pay 1996) 4.60% Original Tax Capacity 16,969 Estimated Market Value and fax .1�;pacit„ Aft .;- ;ir, ;;;v„ :F!nts Land Value 368,900 ' Building Square Feet65,00 ` $23.33 Building Value 1,516,450 1,516,450 Estimated Market Value After Improvement. (---178-85,350—Th 4.60% Estimated Tax Capacity After Improvements 86.726 tructionIII1997 nation 1998 Taxes Payable 1999 Property tax rate for taxes payable in 1996 1.36949 Assumed annual inflation 2.00% Admin Fees 10.00% Interest Rate of Revenue Note 7.00% Date Revenue Note Begins to Accrue Interest 08/01/96 SCHEDULE A illTHE E\: BEST GROUP/CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW BUILDING "K" Cash Proj‘-_ Increment Payment Original Estimated Estimated Less Available Inc: nt Date Years Tax Capacity Tax Capacity Tax Increment City Share Tax Increment ' 08/01/96 16,969 16,969 0 0 - 02/01/97 16,969 16,969 0 0 08/01/97 16,969 16,969 0 0 02/01/98 16,969 86,726 0 0 08/01/98 16,969 86,726 0 0 02/01/99 0.0 16,969 88,461 47,766 0 0 0 08/01/99 0.5 16,969 88,461 47,766 4 ' 42,989 3.5 ' 02/01/2000 1.0 16,969 90,230 4 ,.,,,T -,1 /7 42,989 08/01/2000 1.5 16,969 90,230 48,954 d 8 1.5 02/01/2001 2.0 16,969 92,034 50,165 895 44,44,1058 58 2.0 08/01/2001 2.5 16,969 92,034 50,16E 5,016 4548 2.5 02/01/2002 3.0 16,969 93,875 51,401 3.0 08/01/2002 3.5 16,969 93,875 51.4Q1 5, 0 46, 68 3.0 02/01/2003 4.0 16,969 95,753 51 - 5,140 46,261 3.5 5,140 46,261 4.0 08/01/2003 4.5 16,969 95 7' " 52,661 5,266 47,395 02/01/2004 5.0 16 969 97,;. 53,947 5,266 47,395 5.0 08/01/2004 5.5 53,947 5,395 48,552 5.5 5.5 02/01/2005 6.0 16,969 55,258 5,395 48,552 08/01/2005 6.5 16,969 99,621 55,258 5,526 49,732 02/01/2006 7.0 16,969 101,613 56,596 5,526 49,732II 08/01/2006 7.5 16,969 101,613 56,596 5,660 50,936 7.5 02/01/2007 8.0 16,969 103,646 57,960 5,660 50,936 08/01/2007 8.5 16,969 103,646 57,960 5,796 8.5 02/01/2008 9.0 16,969 105,719 59,351 5,796 52,164 8 0 08/01/2008 9.5 16,969 105,7",9 59,351 5,935 53,416 9.5 9 5 02/01/2009 10.0 16,969 107,833 60,771 5,935 53,416 10.0 08/01/2009 10.5 16,969 107,833 60,771 6,077 54,694 10.5 02/01/2010 11.0 16,969 109,990 62,219 • 6,077 54,694 11.0 08/01/2010 11.5 16,969 109,990 62,219 6,222 55,997 11.5 02/01/2011 12.0 16,969 112,189 63,695 6,222 55,997 12.0 08/01/2011. 12.5 16,969 112,189 . 63,695 6,370 57,326 12.5 02/01/2012 13.0 16,969 114,433 65,202 6,370 57,326 13.0 08/01/2012 13.5 16,969 114,433 65,202 65,202 02/01/2013 14.0 16,969 116,722 66,738 65,202 0 14 0 14.0 .0 1,638,627 274,552 1,297,337 s SCHEDULE B THE EVEREST GROUP/CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW iik_DING "K" • Principal $676,383 interest Rate 7.00% Date of Note 08/01/96 . Payment Beginning Accrued Current Total Interest Principal Ending Date Balance Interest Interest Payment Portion Portion Balance 08/01/96 676,383 23,673 0 676,383 02/01/97 676,383 23,673 0 676,383 08/01/97 676,383 23,673 0 676,383_ 02/01/98 676,383 23,673 0 676,383 08/01/98 676,383 23,673 0 676,383 02/01/99 676,383 23,673 0 676,383 08/01/99 676,383 23,673 42,989 42,989 0 676,383 02/01/2000 676,383 23,673 42,989 42,989 0 676,383 08/01/2000 676,383 23,673 44,058 44,058 0 676,383 02/01/2001 676,383 23,673 44,058 44,058 0 676,383 08/01/2001 676,383 23,673 45,148 45,148 0 676,383 02/01/2002 676,383 23,673 45,148 45,148 0 676,383 08/01/2002 676,383 23,673 46,261 43,362 2,898 673,485 02/01/2003 673,485 23,572 46,261 23,572 22,689 650,796 401/2003 650,796 22,778 47,395 22,778 24,617 626,179 1/2004 626,179 21,916 47,395 21,916 25,479 600,700 1/2004 600,700 21,025 48,552 21,025 27,528 573,173 02/01/2005 573,173 20,061 48,552 20,061 28,491 544,682 08/01/2005 544,682 19,064 49,732 19,064 30,668 514,014 02/01/2006 514,014 17,990 49,732 17,990 31,742 482,272 08/01/2006 482,272 16,880 50,936 16,880 34,056 448,215 02/01/2007 448,215 15,688 50,936 15,688 35,248 412,967 08/01/2007 412,967 14,454 52,164 14,454 37,710 375,257 02/01/2008 375,257 13,134 52,164 13,134 39,030 336,227 08/01/2008 336,227 11,768 53,416 11,768 41,648 294,579 02/01/2009 294,579 10,310 53,416 10,310 43,106 251,473 08/01/2009 251,473 8,802 54,694 8,802 45,892 205,580 02/01/2010 205,580 7,195 54,694 7,195 47,498 158,082 08/01/2010 158,082 5,533 55,997 5,533 50,464 107,618 02/01/2011 107,618 3,767 55,997 3,767 52,230 55,388 1,939 ----57,326 1,939 55,387 0 142,040 421,588 1,240,011 563,628 676,383 1 EVEREST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1\I\1131R O1 111f IVI-RfS1(;R()l'I'I ll) June 21, 1996 SCHEDULE C MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK BUILDING K SITE AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ITEM _ $ 1. Clearing, Excavation, Erosion Control $183,000.00 2. Ponding with Clay Liner 10,000.00 3. Watermains and Hydrants 47,000.00 4. Sanitary Sewers 3,000.00 5. Storm Sewer System 75,000.00 6. Driveway Aprons and Curbing 10,000.00 7. Paving Base 30,000.00 8. Street Lighting 6,000.00 9. Landscaping 25 000.00 10. Irrigation 10 000.00 11. Soil Reports/Surveys 6,000.00 12. Architectural/Engineering Fees 7,000.00 13. Soils Testing/Location Surveys 6,000.00 14. Permits 6,000.00 15. Supervision, General Conditions 15 000.00 16. Overhead and Fee 31,000.00 TOTAL $470,000.00 - _ KSchedC(P) • 2685 Long Lake Road P.O. Box 130190 • Roseville, MN 55113 (612) 636-5500 Fax: (612) 636-0183 SCHEDULE A (CONTINUED)0Mo ds View Building N Site TIF Projections for completion of construction by 12/31/96 05/21/96 Original Market Value and Tax Capacity Square Feet of Land 300,038 Value/square foot $1.6925 Market Value of Land Before Imprc'ements 507,800 (Pay 1996) 4.60% Original Tax Capacity 23,359 Estimated Market Value and Tax Capacity After Improvements Land Value 507,800 Building Square Feet 103,000 $23.33 Building Value 2,402,990 2,402,990 Estimated Market Value After Improvements 2,910,790 Estimated Tax Capacity After Improvements 133,896 Cuction 1996 n 1997 Taxes Payable 1998 Property tax rate for taxes payable in 1996 1.36949 Assumed annual inflation 2.00% Admin Fees 10.00% Interest Rate of Revenue Note 7.00% Date Revenue Note Begins to Accrue Interest 08/01/96 SCHEDULE A THE EVEREST GROUP/CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW "N" s BUILDING Cas l Prcjcc.;,, Increment Tax Payment Original Estimated Estimated Less Available 'ncrement Date Years Tax Capacity Tax Capacity Tax Increment City Sh e Tax Increment Years 08/01/96 23,359 23,359 0 U 02/01/97 23,359 133,8" ' 0 0 08/01/97 23,359 133,8 ' 0 0 02/01/98 0.0 23,359 136,5 75,69r 0 0.0 08/01/98 0.5 23,359 136,57- 75 r ,0 7,569 68,121 0.5 02/01/99 1.0 23,359 139305 T .523 7,569 68,121 08/01/99 1.5 23,359 1 A2 105, 7 5231.0 69,771 02/01/2000 2.0 23,359 1.4.,......:2_ ,.94 7,752 2.0 08/01/2000 2.5 23,359 142,092 79,394 7,939 71,454 2.5 02/01/2001 3.0 23,359 144,933 81,301 7,939 71,454 3.0 08/01/2001 3.5 23,359 144,9:_: 81,301 8,130 73,171 3.5 02/01/2002 4.0 23,359 147,832 83,247 8,130 73,171 4.0 08/01/2002 4.5 23,359 147,832 83,247 8,325 74,923 4.5 02/01/2003 5.0 23,359 150,789 85,232 8,325 74,923 5.0 08/01/2003 5.5 23,359 150,789 85,232 8,523 76,709 5.5 02/01/2004 6.0 23,359 153,804 87,257 8,523 76,709 6.0 08/01/2004 6.5 23,359 153,804 87,257 8,726 78,531 6.5 02/01/2005 7.0 23,359 156,881 89,322 8,726 78,531 7 08/01/2005 7.5 23,359 156,881 89,322 8,932 80,390 02/01/2006 8.0 23,359 160,018 91,428 8,932 80,390 08/01/2006 8.5 23,359 160,018 91,428 9,143 82,285 IF 02/01/2007 9.0 23,359 163,218 93,577 9,143 82,285 9.0 08/01/2007 9.5 23,359 163,218 93,577 9,358 84,219 9.5 02/01/2008 10.0 23,359 166,483 95,768 9,358 84,219 10.0 08/01/2008 10.5 23,359 166,483 95,768 9,577 86,191 10.5 02/01/2009 11.0 23,359 169,813 98,003 9,577 86,191 11.0 08/01/2009 11.5 23,359 169,813 98,003 9,800 88,203 11.5 02/01/2010 12.0 23,359 173,209 100,283 9,800 88,203 12.0 08/01/2010 12.5 23,359 173,209 100,283 10,028 90,255 12.5 02/01/2011 13.0 23,359 176,673 102,609 10,028 90,255 13.0 08/01/2011 13.5 23,359 176,673 102,609 102,609 0 13.5 02/01/2012 14.0 23,359 180,206 104,981 102,609 0 14.0 08/01/2012 14.5 23,359 180,206 104,981 104,981 0 14.5 02/01/2013 15.0 N/A N/A N/A 104,981 0 15.0 2,691,232 642,785 2,048,447 al SCHEDULE B THE EVEREST GROUP/CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Ilicipal $1,156,796 Interest Rate 7.00% Date of Note 08/01/96 Payment Beginning Accrued Current Total Interest Principal Ending Date Balance Interest Interest Payment Portion Portion Balance 08/01/96 1,156,796 40,488 0 1,156,796 02/01/97 1,156,796 40,488 0 1,156,796 08/01/97 1,156,796 40,488 0 1,156,796 02/01/98 1,156,796 40,488 0 1,156,796 08/01/98 1,156,796 40,488 68,121 68,121 0 1,156,796 - 02/01/99 1,156,796 40,488 68,121 68,121 0 1,156,796 08/01/99 1,156,796 40,488 69,771 69,771 0 1,156,796 02/01/2000 1,156,796 40,488 69,771 69,771 0 1,156,796 08/01/2000 1,156,796 40,488 71,454 71,454 0 1,156,796 02/01/2001 1,156,796 40,488 71,454 57,641 13,813 1,142,982 08/01/2001 1,142,982 40,004 73,171 40,004 33,167 1,109,816 02/01/2002 1,109,816 38,844 73,171 38,844 34,328 1,075,488 08/01/2002 1,075,488 37,642 74,923 37,642 37,281 1,038,207 02/01/2003 1,038,207 36,337 74,923 36,337 38,585 999,622 08/01/2003 999,622 34,987 76,709 34,987 41,722 957,899 02/01/2004 957,899 33,526 76,709 33,526 43,183 914,717 O011/2004 914,717 32,015 78,531 32,015 46,516 868,201 /2005 868,201 30,387 78,531 30,387 48,144 820,057 /2005 820,057 28,702 80,390 28,702 51,688 768,369 02/01/2006 768,369 26,893 80,390 26,893 53,497 714,872 08/01/2006 714,872 25,021 82,285 25,021 57,265 657,607 02/01/2007 657,607 23,016 82,285 23,016 59,269 598,338 08/01/2007 598,338 20,942 84,219 20,942 63,277 535,061 02/01/2008 535,061 18,727 84,219 18,727 65,492 469,569 08/01/2008 469,569 16,435 86,191 16,435 69,756 399,813 02/01/2009 399,813 13,993 86,191 13,993 72,198 327,615 08/01/2009 327,615 11,467 88,203 11,467 76,736 250,879 02/01/2010 250,879 8,781 88,203 8,781 79,422 171,457 08/01/2011 171,457 6,001 90,255 6,001 84,254 87,203 87,203 3,052 90;255~,_ 3,052 87,203 (0) 161,951 729,699 2,048,447 ) 891,651 1,156,796 y • j T EVEREST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY A MEMBER OF THE EVEREST GROUP LTD May 17, 1996 SCHEDULE C MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK BUILDING N SITE AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ITEM $ 1. Clearing, Excavation, Erosion Control $75,000.00 2. Ponding with Clay Liner 10,000.00 3. Retaining Walls 70,000.00 4. Soil Corrections 50,000.00 5. Watermains and Hydrants 55,000.00 6. Sanitary Sewers 15,000.00 7. Storm Sewer System 55,000.00 8. Driveway Aprons and Curbing 12,000.00 9. Paving Base 56,000.00 10. Street Lighting 7,000.00 11. Landscaping 45,000.00 12. Irrigation 20,000.00 13. Program Avenue (paving and curb) 25,000.00 14. Soil Reports/Surveys 6,000.00 15. Architectural/Engineering Fees 10,000.00 16. Soils Testing/Location Surveys 10,000.00 17. Permits 10,000.00 18. Supervision, General Conditions 20,000.00 19. Overhead and Fee 39.000.00 TOTAL $590,000.00 2685 Long Lake Road P.O. Box 130190 • Roseville, MN 55113 (61 2) 636-5500 Fax: (61 2) 636-0183 ©TY OF CURDS Phone: (612) 784-3055 •.o Q E /W Fax: (612) 784-3462 S ogress• Partne s• July 1, 1996 Mr. Timothy Nelson The Everest Group, LTD 2665 Long Lake Road, Suite 330 Roseville,MN 55113 Dear Tim: I want to thank you for preparing the proposal on Building"K"as requested and for being patient as we proceed through these negotiations. After our discussions regarding Building"N"and"K"staff is not prepared to recommend your current proposals to the EDA for consideration because the terms of the agreements are not in the best interest of the City for several reasons. The Building"N"proposal would require the City to reimburse Everest for both public improvements 41 and almost all of the investment made in the purchase of the land. The Everest Group made the decision to purchase the land several years ago as an investment without any guarantee that tax increment funds would be available to reimburse for the carrying costs of that investment. In addition,the development of Building"N"would be for a speculative building since negotiations with Company"A"have not proceeded as planned. Several members of the EDA have not been favorable to speculative buildings in the past and corporate citizenship is a concern when tax dollars,whether incremental from the development or not, are involved. The length of your proposal also raises concern as it comes very close to the decertification date of the district. The Building"K"proposal should incorporate the City's costs to acquire the homes not currently owned by Everest. Condemnation proceedings are very costly and lengthy. To meet the planned construction dates the City may need to provide incentives for the relocation of the property owners in an expedient time frame. Current excess increment funds would need to be expended for this transaction and it is in the best interest of the City to replenish a portion of these funds for other redevelopment purposes. In light of these circumstances staff is willing to recommend the following proposal to the EDA for consideration. The proposal takes into consideration some of the EDA's previous desires for future tax increment agreements regarding the Mounds View Business Park, the interests of the community and yet attempts to meet some of your investors needs for an equitable project. Building"N" (Terms: 8-years"Pay-as-you-go"revenue note, 7% interest, 15% Admin) Construction fall 1996, pay 1998 STotal Reimbursement: $757,259.96 present value plus interest of$362,982.04 Assistance per sq.ft.: $2.52 rt* • PRINTED WITH SOY INK TM 2401 Highway 10• Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 a 100%recycled paper Equal Opprotunity Employer Page Two of Two Everest Group 7/1/96 Building"K" (Terms: 10-years "Pay-as-you-go"revenue note, 7% interest, 35%Admin*) Construction 1997, pay 1999 * City would take the lead on acquiring privately owned homes on the site and take the costs of acquisition,relocation, closing and administrative costs for these transaction out of the increment generated from the project. Total Reimbursement: $409,778.38 present value plus interest of$284,499.62 Assistance per sq.ft.: $1.67 Combined proposal: (Terms: 9-years"Pay-as-you-go"revenue note, 7% interest, 20%Admin*) * City would take the lead on acquiring privately owned homes on the site and take the costs of acquisition, relocation,closing and administrative costs for these transaction out of the ink:rer,vut generated from the project. Total Reimbursement: $1,205,672.14 present value plus interest of$661,751.6r Assistance per sq.ft.: $2.21 As you know the EDA has a strong interest in completing the Mounds View Business Park in the upcoming years but we would like to stay consistent with the types of pay-as-you-go tax increment arrangements that have been approved over the past few years. Please contact me as soon as possible if you are interested in discussing this proposal with the EDA at the July 8, 1996 work session. With the July 4th holiday, I would need a response no later than July 2nd to include the information in the EDA agenda packet. Sincerely, aLkOtti.) Cathy Bennett EDA Executive Director cc: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator Jim O'Meara, Briggs and Morgan 11110 85 E.SEVENTH PLACE,SUTTE too SAINT PAUL.MN 55101-2143 612-223-3000 FAX:612.223-3002 // SPRINGSTED Pktik.Rn2rneAdtiista TELECOPY INFORMATION TELECOPY NUMBER: (612) 223-3002 Date: 7 /i J9 (- TO: Ciy or TO: \i/ u/ FAX it: 7 7 1 - 3" Z- ATTENTION: C1Hy 5%6^'^`E7"T PHONE: RE: - k-V E(z c'f 7 GR 4 •1Ai FROM: ‘ 112 v^do F PHONE: (812) 223 - 3 07 3 1111. This is transmitting from a Canon L770 Telecopier. We are sending pages, INCLUDIKG this cover page. If you do not receive all of these pages, please call (612) 223-3000. Thank you. NOTES: Original Material Will: Be sent VIA overnight messenger Be sent VIA courier Be sent regular mail RC WP AUTH Not be sent 11) CUENT NUMBER: JOB NUMBER: SAINT PAUL.MN • MINNEAPOLIS,MN • BROOKFIELD.W1 - (WEILAND PAEX.Xs • WASHING/CS,DC • IOWA CITY.IA 900/T001j 'DNI cIaLSDHI2Ids ZooC CZZ ZT9 XVd SS:TT 96/TO/L0 �•�,, +n.a. vlc LG.) .Juut SPRINGSTED INC. fJ002/008 . 0 eu so N N - a H *C NzeNfee eNmNmNZZO v33 A CO a m �.. 13 or �_ oog gaag aaatooo2aggggggV 4 ma0� . . G = O. azoK n N� • 042 W_ A R -13 <w N N i r 0 0 D CD CD CO V V Cs Cl CJCJd a to to N N r i O O is m O to O in O h O th 0 O 0 Ch O Ch CD Ch O cn O cn O N O Cn O th O Na )X In A Oa 8 in E Na N N N N N N N N N N N Na N = Ca Ca Ca Ca Ca W .co _co W W W W w w 54 i tN.i J CO C.) CCa N N Ca N N N N NC.1 Ca La co Shl 2T m G W CO W co W W W w W co W W W w W W co W W ca W W Za W Ca w Ca w to Ca tat toin a cn cn cn w 0 cn cn ch Ch w th ch Ch to to en cn to m1:0 to tD CD CD O tD CD CD t0 tD fD CD to CD tD CO t0 cD tD tP 4DD 47 t4D 4DD CID 0 to COO COO cn 00 CthD .6-6. 4• k m Ei J co V V V til t71 to til Ch cn r�1 C1 t.11 cn A � rn co I In I4 Cl CO ca CD tp W CD 4.1 CO O O CA C7! to C.1 O p V V A N N co COW CD COw W W N COaootam . P4 atammmmD -`D °I °'�aw�a' 3 CO Co i ..s i i Ca Ca O O a a m coCa"cotD tD O O W Ca Ch to O co to m co .) CD O . W C.s CO CD Cl Ca W W CO a Ca CD -4 i th JD CO N N d C.i - - M CM . CO CD .ch ft N co r _- ,.. j Rf V O O O tD 0 CO CD CO CD CO CO CO Ca Q1 Ca to co CD m ca CO V V .1 V .0 .1 t1 a CO N a a m C11 Ch Ca Ca .a CD V V O G1 til t, i .a •�• -co of ha N O _Co V V to th x.o. Cat ca co coCD eI V cn pc - 3 lo 0 . O a a 0 o O CO V V N N N N CNh CNn <aa GO A d O O rw0 C0D N N COD COD m p: m tD W Co co Ca CO CO V V CO Co Na N V V N N .1 V i i A 41h W Cat O Om CD 3 x C N N — -+ yC ..n V O O <D CD COlD CO CO ID CO a CO CD Ca CD Ca CO cn co o y V V V V 73 CO 3� 0 C9 Cl O Oto to th th to Ca r .a CO CO V V Ch t.n W to -s r t0 lD V J to U1co f0 A coN Na O O v V m Co 44 co N N NO C h CaCaCNa ha 0 cNn O O La ODD CWD N N 0 t0D s O NDj, X34 e Pa4111/ O = tt CD CO m CO Ca Co CO CO CO Ca CO Ca V V V V V V V V V V CT O Cf C1 . C i O O a a CA_CO A A N N O O a co a co A. 7._co _co -+ ... Co CD 01 a e d Ot N N N N -a r NNNN CO c.1 ch th V V O t0O ... ... A A .1 .1 i t 0 .a tail En nn caEaCCD CAD 40 -4 Co CO CD t0 to Ca COCCD NI N NJ .4 s cn cn -s.4 .V. ha ha m a' O H t0 CD Ch Ch O O r i m .v.. if • a fil CO 44 :a -4 co V C1 CD CD th O O O d a A A Ca W W. CO W N N N N Na Ja s v .4 .4 N CD CJI W <D V W r co C1 to ...+ Ca V A Ca O tD Cl Cn Ca N a N i 12 O N N .Cs .I V A N IN....4.p.1 d 'a `a C M-a V to N W r co w .0 Ca la to O <n O ONaCaa s co V 0 a 40 Cb d i CO ha Co CV N CA CO CW W 0 V O i .1 7 N r po r V CO d V m Ca Fal N N b CD V CV CD CD CJV V W Ch V isNCi .41AOv in '-6 p CO pCN V D h CT i ch = d Ch Ca cn d V Co a O1 7h O O N Ca CJ th CO CD N CD a CD V CO C1 h N m Cti Coer S. r< NNNJ N WCa CO A A A Ca a a a a j<a O C1 .► a a Ca o co cn a NJ OcCa.-0p i N C. A cal A NV a a . A Cod VCOO O co V co O n CO Cacop a O"co -4 "to O h Oa O O co co CID W N i CO O Ca Na CO W d a Ca W W Ch A O r V Br 4. .MI.411 N O O W w a -1 r CiO N cn SD Ol .s N fa a 74 ch -6 oa1 ca Uf .t °o-4iNNO00m - s , CDdtC4 OinA `a O p V cn O a d Ch a V cn -6iQt ti . b en N co I 42 N p Ak O d a CD a a CO CO a V V V V COto Ca .l .0 .t .0 .r CA 01 en 0) 0l 1►A N N O O a to 0) Cl A A to W r r CO t0 N N N N -. -a ha j m NO Ca GP Ch Ch V V ZD CD r a s .0 .t i i y Ch th O b CO tD OO Cd tat O O N N V V en Ch VV N_ h 0 0 0 co cn cn co Cat r i CO CO cn CJI O O r r CD CD N N -,a J cn cn J �C O O o O CD 0 C5 C O CD O O C Ca 0 o O O C] O CD 0 0 CD CD C O 0 CD CD coaC CO 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O p p p p 0 0 0 0 C' 0 0 0 0 0 0 O3 ... .. Jy i i . . r j i i i i O 3 Y N W coa Ch O Cl V V O W CD t0 CO O O i i i N NN N N CJ N N-a Al .. -.. OD .1 Ch N ca co Ca 4) w r C1 N co -a Ch CD W V O a V O N th .1 O th i .t -A V i O .I CD co cn C1 V a m O m 1i V CD Co CJI CD N W N SCStJl co V a CO N .ata Ciltath000C cocoON _ CD VZDONAmcoat .0acaCfi.l-1‘) —4O m V r r CD CD COCO v CD Cn O N O Co r m Ct N C1 O Cs a a N to [av. O Chwl O N po CD cn Ca p C1 V r Co CA O Cl c0 -a Qs cn to O 74 Cl CJ N fD V W 0O O O tO tO r 0 Ch W COD ha O O CO co CO Ch C Cas COO CA Na A CO CAO CO O a O N + = Ami N N W CO r N O N th O CO Cb O CD W CD C CD O Q Ca 0 d . m . • a.a J[ 12 aIn in y 0. :A to C.s <rC ma V C N NaN i O O CO CO a! m r r co Cl SA O d a ca C a As Na r i p p �. Cap i O cn O Ch O Cn O th C Cn O ch O Ch C O O Ch G Cn C cn O ch p Cn Q O6 Ch Ca CI .NJ :. '1t3 Cho 07/01/96 11:59 FAX 612 223 3002 SPRINGSTED INC. 11003/006 -1 E. n o c Q . do do c , 0 h m Q � s cri a a a a a a aog $ g aaaa g A A W C� N N C>0 V V Cn v A .�. .�. 1 Z 0 'R ? C Ca e. A C" N 4sY� "J V C) 5n CD d A 41 4/ N N .a r O D ^ W A Ai C iCi ch 7 an O Cn o in 6 cn 6 in 6 inO Ch O ; " 3 Q. ,� to w O 0 3 3 o NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN y 0 co a♦ 4t W CJ 4f 4l tat CJ W w w W(.S 41 w to W 4t tat W W w co fp 41ww Www� wiaww W co W W 4 cal Ca la Ca L CC ti t71 CTl C71 Ch cn Ch Ch cn CA cn GA CM Ch Ch CA Ch Ch Ch Ch en w n _. 31. D c0 C co t0 c0 co CC co CC co co co co co co CC t0 CO Cc ak" X y 3' gm CD Ch CA Cn GTI Ch Ch A A A A A A co Ca Ca c.) w w N m O C) W W O O.7.4V to A N N t0 sO Ct :A W w 4) 103 O m m In to y V m m CC tC O 0 w Ca cn CA C>;) m w in Ju C0 m 0 C? CO 1D Cat W w W CO CG O a -.4V O 0 Cn ^ n '-1 CG -+ r CA Cn CO Cp N N co Cat -. -+ GTS th .4 a Ci Ci up V 4 x CL a m o CG CO Co CO to m 0 0 a =G so CG 4-.4:4 ch v►:��COat .tea' v�_eJJ1 v e3 co3 A 4/W N N N N N N W W w co Cn oh O C) O N N N Ch Ch CO W A A.0 O CG CG N N CO CO 3 -I 1, 0 Co N N V V N N V V r .a A. A w W 0 0 CA a D 2. -I J to 3d II V W <atatWNNNNNN -, � .44N . 41 a a CT W W O O V V A A . ... CO CO Of C1 Ca W N a go COcOCDCDCOCOCDCtCD0OONN CJI en__. n C 1 ; D Cb CO (1D ca OS 01 V V Ch an 0 CO m en A A : v • F o V rI .0 .1 .0 V .0 .0 C3 7) r. CO C) C) C) en Cn sn 4 :14 N N O O _co cO V V GA SA ah A Ca v G_. n g 0D A A V -C -+ 4a A Oo CO W to A) N N Q) CA AAO CI) CD O co Co O CO G4 co -4 Q, ka tp 1:4'A d co Co .I V O O C) O Ch Gn 0 c an CD .:-.1a g t0 $ t# C V CA V V CD Cf CA Ch Cn CI) A Ad A W CO 4/N Al N V w C G> .A O O C71 Cr)SO SD Ja co OQ1 A m V CD ia CA co C! V C71 Q! co D r V O m W co_coC .a CO Ca A t]t m 0 V Co N .1 N .a CA cn V OD CD cn CO V W O CD CO 7 C71 GA N ia CO -1 .A A m CD as OA Ca Co CO O -+ r. tt. tt m Cnaz4 -hCal46 co NNV V V 46 -.4 CA N V CD co CT O m V .a 4 CO CA CO CD O W v A O CD oh Cal Q) N N O r CO W Ch V CO NJ N N N N N N N N N CO A CA 0) m cG o� V CC OI w en :4 CC .I c,m o m — CI) CC Gt W A CA 3 N V m Ch CAJ V 50 .CAA _COI V cNO O m 4. r P 1• 1 co i .wa A r on N � D'0 CC W N Co A O N Cha COG CC) -v+ d 1 N C -moi crit a D Go.... it at chn .4 VNNVV CD CD D Cf CO CD D CMO OS4 d d C O GO SO V V Gh Ch A A .9 CG CO .a .a A 41. V V -. ... A A CO C9 Cd W .000000 .A o m V V O O p pQ .0 At N N C) Cf A Cl Qf Ql 6t .GOA ,GOn CC Ccn C CA CA O O O 3 f 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 O O ma SD a, 000000aDOOooOD0000a o3go -a N N co w CJS Ch CD C) Cf V V CO CO CD V V 1.1.1W g.g. V A 41, .0 Ca CO 0 GD O A Co N O) O Ca . CD CA W A .a CA C)p ID C. N O CM C O CC A CC . to V $. 3 n Cn Ca CD 0 'pfJ N O WN 0 V en V .-aA Of CS N 54C. drC) coONd000oGnOtodOb ca ....1 cnco 1) 72 III O cn W m O W V C) O N to O V CJS Na 6 Co gi + 2 O N co V O CD CO A N CD GD -+ A N N Cn O al gEt MC N N CJI r ' IQ CO �G Qi m V r CSus cn 10 O) ch Cn A A tai Ca N N •a .► O O _. 141 A Cn O Ch 0 Gn O in 6 Cn O Ch 6 CA O Cn 0 in O Cn O = a D sa J THIS IS IT. . . . FOR THE WEEK OF JULY 1 - JULY 5, 1996 ADMINISTRATION • Many issues that are being worked on are probably covered in other reports here. Cathy and I continue to work with our advisors on the Bel Rae project. It is my hope that by the end of the month we will be in a position to present sufficient information on the Bel Rae options that the Council is comfortable going ahead to the community for additional input. We seem to be on track for that. • As you will hear we had some problems with the heat and sprinkling system at the golf course. Some grass has died on the greens and we are working to rectify the problems with the golf course architect and sprinkling people. It certainly has been frustrating. Mary and I will brief the Council on this Monday evening. • Speaking of frustrating,the Everest group is holding firm on their position for assistance on the building "N" site. Cathy is addressing this with you more than I will here, but I definitely think they are trying to push buttons. While staff has been viewing negotiations with them as based on past agreements, it may be prudent during our discussion Monday night to think about what would simply be acceptable to the City for participating in a project on this and possibly the"K"site. I have asked Rob Davidson and Tim Nelson to attend and make their appeal directly to the Council,but they seem to prefer to try to persuade me more. Either way, Cathy and I will discuss the situation with the Council Monday evening. • As you can see on the agenda there are a few other items to contend with Monday and I will discuss them with you then. Have a great weekend and 4th of July! Chuck • Councilmember Blanchard and I did a final walk through of the Bel-Rae before we took possession on July 1st. We will be having the locks changed this week. The new phone number will be 780-6273 with a voice mail system to take messages. Tony is keeping the Bel-Rae Corp. active and would still like the same phone number. He is consulting for other ballrooms on a part time basis. We are already getting requests for keys for use of the space by staff for Festival in the Park and other various activities. I have contacted Decision Resources. Chuck and I will be meeting with them after the 4th to discuss question structure. Jim Hess is getting quotes for a complete survey on the property and I am having the Phase I Environmental study completed. Chuck and I will be meeting with Nick Temali and Jan Witthuhn to discuss various options and what the best approach would be with the School Board. I will have a date for the meeting to you as soon as possible. We have scheduled meetings with Bob Thistle and V.B. Digs to discuss particulars with regards to their ability to finance. We have finally received a copy of a business plan so we are moving along. • The Mounds View Business Directory has been published and was delivered to homes this past weekend. If you did not receive a copy at home come see me. Cathy • Thursday, June 27, 1996 interviews were conducted for the receptionist position. The interview panel has narrowed the applicants to one finalist. Staff is in the process of conducting background and reference checks. A formal recommendation will be presented Monday, July 15, 1996. Lynnette Alluillimilliiiiiiiiiiiillmillimilliiiiiiiiiiimilliimillillill PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY PARKS: • The AAU Regional Baseball Tournament was a great success. The parks crew had the park looking great. The weather, although very hot and humid,was perfect. A letter of thanks is attached from the host committee. Special thanks to Steve for the assistance that he offered the host committee. • The playground equipment for Random Park arrived Tuesday. The equipment has been temporarily stored and will be inventoried for payment. Installation will begin in a few weeks. RECREATION: • Festival buttons are being sold and t-shirts have arrived and are being distributed to committee members. The Street Dance at the Mermaid this Sunday will kick off the Festival's activities. Festival T-shirts have arrived,Festival buttons are for sale. The first clue for the medallion hunt will be available at businesses Sunday. Festival activities are on a roll. It will be a busy week next week with all the activities. See flyer attached. FORESTRY: • Rick's crew has been out at Silver View chipping the many trees at the park-they were anxious to have the trees chipped for the AAU baseball tournament. A number of hazardous trees were removed from parks. Rick has been receiving many resident calls requesting his observation of yard trees -trees that are loosing leaves, damaged by ice storm, etc. GOLF COURSE: • The pump at the golf course had a phase/voltage cutoff last weekend during the hot temperatures and high humidity causing several greens to become too hot and thus cause damage. Daytime sprinkling has been occurring to cool down the greens during the heat. This may inconvenience golfers, but it is necessary to maintain the turf. First half debt service fees have been paid. Half season report shows that golf course operations expenditures and revenues are in line. The course continues to be busy. Mary S. FINANCE • Dorothy sent out shut-off notices in June so people are coming in and paying their bills this week. Hopefully, there wouldn't be any shut-offs taking place next week. She had a very busy but good vacation. • Kitty is on a well-desired vacation in Washington, D.C. until July 9. • This week is my last week as Interim Finance Coordinator. I attended my last staff meeting for Department Heads on Tuesday, I am writing my last"This Is It" article and I have moved my office back to the front area of City Hall. I am continuing to work on the budget. • I am going to use this opportunity to extend several "Thank you's." First, a sincere"Thank you"to the Council members for showing great confidence in me by appointing me to the position of Interim Finance Coordinator. I enjoyed the challenge of the position and hope I will be able to take what I have learned and contribute more in my duties here with the city. Second,thanks to the Department Heads who worked with me and encouraged me. I have a much better understanding and appreciation of the many facets of their job. Third, sincere thanks to City Staff. Everyone, from every department, was wonderful,patient, and supportive to me. Finally, I am hard pressed to express in mere words my"thank you"to Kitty and Dorothy for their support and strength. They have worked up to 12 hour days and come in some weekends in an attempt to keep up with the work load generated by their additional duties. They have never done.anything but their very best. I was confident that with everyone's help the three of us,together, could handle the job. YOU ALL came together and made the past eight months work. THANK YOU. Mary T. PUBLIC WORKS • The streets dept. has been patching streets in preparation for slurry sealing in the upcoming weeks. Several manufactures have left demonstrator rollers for us to use during the past two weeks. This has provided some very helpful analysis of the different machines, their capabilities and specifications. Staff is proposing to replace the City's current roller in 1997. Cracksealing equipment has also been demonstrated in the previous weeks in preparation of a 1997 purchase. • Final inspections were performed on sanitary sewer main at the Sherwood Estates development this week. • Construction of the public utilities began last week for Larry Beach's twin homes on Silver Lake Road. Some complications developed and as a result, on July 1, 1996 a Stop Work Order was issued. Until several items are corrected or addressed, no further work will be allowed on the project. • Mark has been working on the spray bar assembly for the liquid calcium chloride tank for the past couple of weeks. It is nearing completion, and is very well constructed. - • The second automatic meter reading started this week. After the phone reads are complete, staff will change the SSI (programmer/radio reader)to radio and the radio reads will be performed by staff. It is anticipated that a few of the installations will not call in and we will have to be reinspect them. • Bid openings for the Bronson Reconstruction project and the 1996 Slurry Seal will be opened on Monday, July 8, 1996. • Numerous employees have been on vacation. Larry and Gary have recently returned from vacation and this week Wally, Tracy, and Bill Hanson are enjoying their vacation. Mike • (11111111117POLICE • Pat Michna has been on vacation this week. Dave Brick returned to work on Wednesday after catching many fish in Canada. • The three juveniles that stole the car and were arrested in Florida,have returned to Minnesota. We are charging all three with burglary and auto theft. The reports have been submitted to the County Attorney. In a related issue,we are meeting with Tom Frost(County Attorney Office) on July 26 to discuss various issues. • On July 1st,a new patrol schedule went into effect. Some of the guys that were working nights are now on days. Tim Brennan is our Community Policing Officer. Other changes will occur in the next couple of months. Tim COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • Barb Benesch returned from a vacation with her family to Hayward Wisconsin, Madeline Island and the Wisconsin Dells. She and Matthew saw their first wild black bear. • As you recall, staff and St. Paul Legal Aid went to court against the owner of 2091 Hillview in order to enforce the housing and building codes on the building. We appeared on Friday, June 21, at which time the judge decided that the owner of the building was not able to make the repairs to the building that were required by the City of Mounds View. He asked St. Paul Legal Aid to find an administrator and he would appoint them to manage the property. We reconvene on July 12, 1996, at which point the Judge will appoint the Parliament Company to manager the property, collect rents and contract services for rehabilitation. We are hoping that the process will move along quickly. • Rick Jarson is on vacation from July 1- 12. • I will be on vacation, camping at the Apple River Campgrounds July 5th and 8th. • The Community Development Department has issued a record number of building permits again!!!!! In May 1996, 87 building permits were issued!!! • Hope everyone has a great 4th of July!!!II Joyce "La 012 223 3002 SPRINGSTED INC. 004/OQ6 .4 O y C ll, • o "` r O O m (O m CiI U1 fbi� N N O CD CO� m C1 V7. a m (Q' IT o a q iQ IiI .w W r �, v v Yl QI ... 4 W r. Ch o U7 tJ1 O ra+ C 'n CII t�: p O A G O ,� `; v Cq NM JK O O Of Of CA OJ Of CA OJ CA C'' 3 Of Q7 CA OT CA O t0 m m Cp m m co m A O? 7J C11 :CA to ' �, A • m m to m m m m m o Of CA Of Of of Of 0� Of Ci t0tc*a OOf OOi 001 , 1 O cCltOtptOCOOpCOmCOtOmm tp CD CD tD O OO Rm U jj CO O CO O O O 0 p O COtv V CO CJf CO { CC CO co CO Cu co r w N N `D m V V CJI_cm W Co t0 0 0 W CO J V 0 Q1 Q! to m m m , O Cb 0 C1J C1 (0 O: O O O O W cd tom ..' r . N N m m ,. W = m N N o OT t1 O O Ji A N N CO t0 Ja t7! OI , . . ... 0 . . „ �' yy v at Q. 1t9 P 0momOmnU1rrrmmJ1lmemtU r" .,a2 ,7" CCJWNNOOtD. 0CDUfCNCJW NN "` v AA Of, lVJOmCJtOom7. . ~ ~oj CJI OQmm .M ' OmOG (CN0O ".RtJcCOVV _a 0OvAC JR a m m CA CA CI) O1 O1 CJl CTI CN cit CN Cn CJf CN CN 0 CJ1 Cil 0 CN CN CTI a a TI V W N N 0 O = 0 V V OOi QT CJl Ch 4/ W NJ N .+ O O m 0 v v o .64114 :0 N C N N y V W W m to o QT N N CO m OT m a A ... .a tom v v ? 0 14 DM 01 CA O O CO cm CA CO CA O O N V �7 CJl Zn V V v A III..,N a�. a s .. ..► OCit W r a DG CJCiCJCicm cm iCJcm um A -0 a s 3a A AA .� a A� CVCJtiJWWNNOCmmCVVCOAtm 9 m O12 amiDCOmv -.sWNN-• OOi0 0 p+ — •aNCOto2CQ — Ofm t, ,, GJIm = = OAAUilmm E � 0 OPN12 ctVvaO {aoNNNNCi ' owooO Sy CO V Jm cm mJa A WA acw Cd 1 A j O ma CN CaN4. N P4 O r GN cD N N N NW CNNOV6NN f0vCAVOCn i 41 crt Td WNAdCO . � viXNOVW oom . av O NAi� W m t0 O A 4yW CON V -a CL N oNJm cn 'b C NCmOO r JCT O mVj a -.4 C o 4O6ON om O -av y YCm 4a V V OO at A co m O N CJO Q O A -+ N Ja is m 41. .CD 46 Jab."Z► CaVJ r.► a O`~ NV N NOV m v NNd G+ -4ACN 0OCJ~ mmW OmmOpN djda Nm ... m' cWmC. COovw01ovmOO o0mA10 • ym MNp VW -+ aovimNNN -. ;AC1 -• WNmN 9W CJaIVtNmmNOA4LNIDaaCbNN0CDOAOO ooOOWmA COW W .+ OT N CJN CN A -4 N) A A m $— 'fCJCJct CJJC1 CI co CN X71 Am adaNNUIWWNNpbsnOovV 0J. oC mCm _ Om m dA _ AmWWW . mCOOmmAaJJm.► JIVv _ pwcoppop000000 3 ;71 O CO O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 b p o o O o 0 0 0 O 0 0 o O O p p p O O 0 ..- 0 - o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O 0 o O O O o l w O =y "� -� N N N W C„t aiiv,o"' omow_cvN � 4. m -. 4tvon°fmvo -. " vvvaovvvrnrn obi CFI: W Qf O tJ1 A CJi N JVI �j m N a C I O CA O Lv_Cn CN A N m CC a_cV.t v r V w O Of r CVp N m N 0 V m V tmD V Cv0 O .CC ► m CA V N t P4N -+ O V C.t fl' m m n o a m g V N O m m a -. N m = 0 a p -. W m m V •CNN •m p4 V m m Z ... NC00 .Ija oatipo � � CCC (.3 JCCCNNMCOM . COcilfrTW �mm � y W V cit C11 A 4i r V CJ ti m r 111 ftt E CO o �+ A . wt4iii mi. mi m co1.4 N "4 -. 00tOmmCovvmascJlcJlaauJ caNN - -1 ^ 0 3 V N O CN O CN O CN O p01 o 0 0 0 :741 0 cnOtnOwOCJfO [714fJ1OCTIGvtO (JIO va 7 ta Q CJJ 07/01/96 12:00 FAX 612 223 3002 SPRINGSTED INC. Cj 005/006 o N III _ rnQeNm � mL� m � � eN. CNeQeme C3 i O 3 - aaa aaaaaaaaaa $ ssge � V � . ; , : ia la `•5 n O 7G c v p a O �, -( A h $ U2O �OCOmm 7.4 Imm571ChaawWNNirpp co 3 m C omoir 6obir, omobbmbmoinomo va 3 a 39 m 3 ama� mrnmmm5� a: ma) mofofc)� Pw�� �� rnasa,rn n m iowmmminCp Cp (C CO CO CO 000 <Dsaf CO COCDCo Q a m m m 5m0 w w mm top tmo m m o (o o t00 w CD o COO t00 f00 o o o o o 01 o twit �� g 7 S1 g m ul O O o 0 O O 0 0 0 CO W O W W CO W to m m m m m m i ..a m v 01 in w of i -' CO <O'i V UI v1 w W N N O O m m C m m m C a 3 m v V Of O) m m C)o m 0) V V Ca Ca 0 0 N N A A V V m o m as �f w i i A . ...ti - N N m C) CA 571 V V W w W W O) m N N a) m m .-- n `a r? wmmmmaa m ( Aamo) cncnoo -. .. mmmmm y�' x Aa O tpletp m m w cn ui v1 u) at of c>t v1 tr en of en m 57157, a a ,A a C.) O CD Ca V�I C) m•571 <71 l+) 4f N N i i 0 p m m V�I A 3 m V W W <0 O t7)C)1 N N 0 m C)m �s d _. CO CO V V 3 3 o vcnclmmocmoo a mooa� mmcnmm -c -. t 0 i J i O O C) m 0. m V V .► . to to d A ih m vm am -1 w 0. 0 .n 43 a o o o co m to t0 P m m m .�V r Q) 5JI 'i CD m V VINjV mm wmCif� -0.iDtOthCltr � .I -I 5A 0 �� A A a. V V mmOO � dmmwwCaw571CJ1ww ...► � m ... O la 111 . w W W w W w W w W w w w w w w w w w W w w V AMJ70 nc) I ) 571 i aawwNN - -. - A Da C77 1.2 of cn mo v v to moo i�) icsia `a)oao m o 0 3 s7 b ... ..► m V V �I V m m -. m m w w j i O 0 N N .s a A -fa. p r.., © m m a a v v m m m m O O .+ V V O O m m yy .••• • .3. 7C ie T m C w w w w w N N N N N N N . . P w as . .r'p o v a, cn -D i - , :..1 c) Cii . m MO CO V m V C0 CO N W V O i► V w 0) w V UI 0 .A tD w m ca mm V — N V O m N �C a m m m m to -+ o w m O i al O ( 4% d 3 SJ N ACO V + m t!) -hP # 571 C) d a 5a) m -A w Ja N n tJ a m V m N d r m (•p CO m p N m m N m O A i0 O to J k) k) (0 W m N O 00 N m m w ) i 0 m 0 L7t O V N 1f. aft y N Ca a N v d to V A m t0 O -+ N N w 1a Ja m m V m C1 cn la A i. w rn m (0 p 50 CO m m iu N o O) N C0 O O tJ P O m m m V -a W a N V V A m 5h t0 i w W w CJf O m .m A .3► V acne. (ovm � dmAatO -• N _+ wGrtwacoiSJdN A A th o N 1f. ,lC71 m C A O a O -I W w v 571 m M o 0 01 V N N foo o N V N 0> O N m N N V Cr t0 O t0 0o (C tit 0 A. O 50 cn O V N A .C.O = 0) A. w w W w W w w w w.W w w w w w w w w w -m m v cbm CJI n!J1 Lf1 . w ca N N i i -i _► m N m to m m V V w o O O sl N A a m W a W O O 01 V r v v V m m -. m m w w + i 0 0 N NA A K am maa mvv92a, oPO000m00000co — 3 c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'o tb O 0000000000000000000000000 O = y 0 gm ... ' NN (a) Ca �.t cow .I . . . . .. A g+ i w v O W V 0 N U m O N A V O O N a 571 V m V m W N O v r 0 O O W Cn O t0 O 0 m m N m N m O it m A 5D 1Z 11 N N N (0 -.I V7 A A O) p m m N 0 w O W i O) C) N W CD — V m OV m O m m 571 m 5?C m m A N V W cn A m m �! m W N m N V � � d 4J O) m N N CO O V f0 �I N m f0 tD A Cp !J1 CC A m O m A Q m L 111 O a d 1 V O a m m + o m M V a 0 Al V o N i . m m m w = 7. to owiwwiw — mN Vmmo -. mcmcmoomNm .. A .,. A O m r0 _ DD N N r i 0 0 5p l0 G7 m V 7I 0 0 "., @ 3 0 (b o m t7t A W GJ N N �► H 0 O m p m O cm O U1 0 c,)) O 5)f C Cn O cn O m 0 m o 5J1 O to O P4 p) a w m _. __ &.Vj rm 0jc Lz3 3001 SPRINGSTED INC. . Z006/006 , 0 mmn 'O M .4410 01 = Ci m 11 N z N N e N R N N e N N N seN e N b04 33 m o D. ° T0 a T. 3 a g ad $ 88SN � � 22 � M ? �3 � � � 3 a ' ° y � m •4 .4eDa) vDcnAacacanDnD � � oo2Z o of a cn o w o 'v1 o ul o o o vD o of o D a R° i i q Dn A 3 aD m C a $0mm .i .ioDoDof ;A ''D !) jc ra m - ^ A• a in ooinoinoirocnou, oo, ocnooIC a r of t]° is 3 9 .O AAAAAAAaaJ. AAAAaAAaaAa .0 y o m = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 C) N 4D !E 4) 6i W W W W W CJ w w w W L.. .W Ga W W W f.) V1 V m a om mmmmmmmmmmmommmmmmoNom "w4 X 0 E NN �1N CND OND ON 0 LA CNA U? A d A A CNa (.2 ( C.2 N tJ N N to to A Si 01 — — pQf LODl.Df AC + (Wd Wrr2 O O0 0 'm4) W mm4,0WOO . 00DNNA0OOOCN 4. 43.gWOOOO00mWVV — .. mOOOm ., m R N j m a s V V d AN N N N V .D n C CDmnnNCNNWC0omc � Aaoca0 3o '-fW onrnrna0.Das00i. aww0. 0000m (0CD00 gE. .1k a m 1 m NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN .. r �` m wraUICD ov .raDo, rnrncnnDv�_rncD� cn �D _3. m e CDC � � a .A ..j J om � o VyUI (S� wc � !'! o o c O) CT r V V w w o g ri `' O w 0 o W W O o m m m m a R q $ H ... • I. 3 D D m mcnLnNN00v V UIU? •' O OOCnCf n C N m A otNN00p0 a s C) O) O) W W w - .V► Cl '. N o C]1 CJf C W O O CO CO a A Cv W a a m m cva W V r W W C71 m 3 t DD p ria m m -+ � N N CS QO ,O at0 einb r _. O-.►d.. rC Yi -, - 0 . 0 . . . ..J ... . . , . . . - - 0. cn N CO�I N AOArtVA OOAN 7. 7.m aaNVao7fOOoODVWAN Va oomnvVa � NAmovmD41 aLm .1 —. .. rooAmo0NMaom Ar A .ACA ... VpWC .... AAmC0VA '. Am ^A % O O N m -. O W W o1 V . CnA a 0 0 a iWv 17 a. m v CD f1 . i r N N NV w w w v-wlWO a+ aL. a _AGJI AJa•0�®r aV !Am ONCA 1Lnm_V OmmOWmmA VN0mtmCO_mW .1O _VGal N aOv .. a0rNraOmr.DOON00gP4CO .. VbLea's Ar► m Gaf C0VNoOrAo'thomo61200wmo — ) 0CpOm ... Om0OdVLnWVAOCD qMMNW Waa.`, r CM ED LM V + j r r 00000000 C1 01 + 0 m m Cn o N N O O V V Gn Ch N N O O 0 0 N j a CA m- o w _V r m o N N 'm o Ah CD M M O) r- — V V V V 1 W C+1 m (O CD a d Ga W d? m 4t CJ m m N N O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 000a000000000000000ao omg_ J ...i. ... .i f r r ...► r v �, -' �DL.Daofa) .D .Dmoob - (0 (3?Di.Di� i� m j.� NawN - 00 D W ov (.2000 ^N w <mao �p d CD _ W OD A r V a m N CD ...V tDt a M n V W .. o W m O V w N rm W V o t)f m m O a UI O N W (31 V N Ln CD m W m — W m Ln .A V - 61 .Ni - N w N v m -' N w a N V 02 Cd V P OD O N pj M VD nD W W w N V . V N O V m 0 a N m 0 .. v W �+ o o A m aD em aD o III Amb 1,4O k N .< 1 m � 0 o cm Cm O0 m v1 '4P11 O D1 Ln A d c.4 tB N N -1 -` o O : V :lb " cnoGnoiDlaGa 'ocnocnoiNocno016bfoCJI 0 N 7 3 ae m uiT3;� REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section 3 ' STAFF REPORT 0' 1{ ` Report :I /111174V66 • `1 = ' % Number :_M MEETING DATE 40 `'"`f July 8, 1996 Report Date: 7/3/96 (14'''''sS 4'`''s•Partnership Item Description: Consideration of Bronson Drive Reconstruction Bids Administrator's Review/Recommendation: -No Comments to supplement this report X -Comments attached. Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary) Summary: The Bronson Drive Reconstruction Bid opening is Monday July 8, 1996 at 11:00 am. Staff will present Council with the results and recommendation at the meeting. Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works III RECOMMENDATION: ii_`.'•ull i©F REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section,_ STAFF REPORT I I 40 -,. � -112'L):=; Report Number: WO • "BION MEETING DATE ;,_.,,,; Report`=`1'j` 'v 8, 1996 P Date: 7/3/96 rOfrPsI. ‘.;CO''Partners Item Description: Consideration of Slurry Seal Bids Administrator's Review/Recommendation: -No Comments to supplement this report X -Comments attached. Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as iii:;, Summary: Bid opening for the Slurry Sealing for 1996 is Monda- y 8, 19 J at 10:00 am. Staff will present the results and recommendation at the meeting. Streets scheduled sealir_ his year are the following: Eastwood Road County Road I to County Road J Edgewood Drive Hillview Road past Laport Drive Greenfield Place Edgewood Dr. to Greenfir' -,nue Greenwood Drive County Road I to Hillvie dcl Hillview Road Jackson Drive to I-35W ice Road I-35 Service Road Pinewood Drive to Col, .i Village • Knoll Drive Hillview Road to Lois ive Lois Drive Jackson Drive to Cul : ;; Sac Oakwood Drive Jackson Drive to Quincy Sherwood Road Eastwood Road to Greenwood Road St. Michael Street County Road I to Oakwood Drive St. Stephen Street County Road I to Oakwood Drive Sunnyside Road T.H. 10 to Hillview Road Terrace Drive Quincy Street to I-35 Service Drive Woodlawn Drive County Road I to End of Pavement Greenfield Park Parking lot //' L,ll/'Ec-/ .,..,,„4,e,--G, Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works RECOMMENDATION: 111 <A " REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section S STAFF REPORT I 1 g`i'M M Report Number: Po',-/776 0/S WORKSESSION MEETING DATE /-o July 8, 1996 Report Date: 7/3/96 • �rPri'Par[ne6h4S Item Description: Review of Pleasantview Drive Assessments Administrator's Review/Recommendation: -No Comments to supplement this report X -Comments attached. Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary) Summary: In light of the tabling of the Pleasantview Drive Assessments, staff would like to take the opportunity to explain some of the questions that the public asked during the hearing and also some that the Council might also have had. I wish to apologize for not providing this information in the earlier staff report. The interest rate for the assessment was tabulated based on current interest rates that the City could procure 4.228 %, plus 1% for administration, which is allowed by law. The project was not bonded, although it was thought that all assessments would include interest. The amount of interest is for the entire assessment amount. That amount is then divided into five annual payments. The interest is not compounded for the remaining balance of the assessment. ere are a few reasons the assessment is taking place almost two years after the project was completed. Staff as working on developing a standard City Assessment Policy, and proceeding with an assessment during this procedure could have added more confusion to the process. Staff was also working on an entirely new budget process which became very time consuming. It is also noted that, staffing levels in the Public Works Department changed, adding additional responsibilities to many staff members. The last item that staff received questions on, was about the number of plans for the project. Ramsey County designed the project based on residential input regarding the width of the street. The City of Fridley and the City of Mounds View did review and approve the plans. As with any project, some minor modifications were made in the field based on actual findings and circumstances. I hope these explanations clear up the questions received from the public. Staff again apologizes for not providing this information in the staff report for the public hearing. If Council y additional questions regarding this report, please feel free to call me. Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works T , 6- repfm- mv. qtp-Irp-ii 145 MEMO TO: CHUCK WHITING • FROM: MARY SAARION DATE: JUNE 26, 1996 SUBJECT: FENCING FOR ATHLETIC FIELDS Throughout the years I have identified athletic fencing needs for compliance to safety and distance standards for various fields throughout the community during the budget process. Unfortunately, while replacement or extension of ballfield fencing continues to be extended "one more year" in the Long Term Financial Plan, ballfield fencing has not survived budget cuts. Bailfield fencing is listed in the 1997 LTFP with Hillview Park and City Hall playfield fencing extension suggested for 1997, Silver View field #2 for 1998 and Silver View#1 for 1999. These same capital improvements were previously presented for other years gone by, but did not survive budget cuts as was earlier mentioned. The Parks and Recreation Commission has identified the upgrade of athletic fields for safety as a goal for 1996. They have visited Hillview and Groveland Parks and have identified these two parks as a priority for the installation of sideline fencing from the backstops through the overthrow areas of first and third base areas. Fencing would enhance the safety of youth • ballplayers who have a tendency to overthrow or miss balls which then go into the streets of both parks. I have cost estimates for both projects. The estimates have been forwarded to Ernie Lepore,Irondale Baseball Association Board member who expressed an interest in possibly contributing to the cost of installing fencing at Groveland Park. I have not heard back from the Board of Directors. City Hall and Silver View fencing have been costed out every budget season, as they have been • included in budget requests. Ideally, the height of these fences would be 10 feet. This would provided safety for those outfield players that jump in the air to catch fly balls. In addition, it would make it more difficult to hit balls over a 10' fence. The fence at City Hall is old approximately 18 years old) and needs replacement. It is at the point of being dangerous. Both new posts and fabric need to be replaced. Due to new bats and caliber of players, balls are hit out of the field on a regular basis. Additional fencing height would make it more difficult to hit the home run. Silver View fields also need fencing height increased to provide safety for outfield players. The extra height would also make it more difficult to hit a home run. This fencing too has outlived its longevity and should be replaced. 0 • 1996 WORK PLAN MOUNDS VIEW PARKS & REC 1111 REATION COMMISSION 1. IMPROVE ARDAN PARK - Review plans and recommend improvements to the compost facility located in Ardan Park - work to be planned and funded by Ramsey County. 2. COMMUNITY GARDENS AT WOODCREST PARK - Offer Woodcrest Park as a community gardens site for residents and/or groups who wish to pursue passive, "with nature" activity in the form 'of growing flowers, vegetables, and herbs at Woodcrest Park. 3 . ADVOCATE FOR OFF-STREET BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PATHS - Assist the City in planning an activity dedicating the pedestrian bridge over Highway 10 connecting Long Lake Road. Advocate for an off-street path with the improvement to Bronson Drive. Advocate for off-street paths in the Highway 10 / County Rd H projects. Advocate the State for ISTEA funding for Blaine for an off- street path along County Road J which will provide a bicycle/pedestrian path to The Bridges Golf Course. 1110 4. PARTICIPATE IN THE COALITION OF CITIES FOR AN INDOOR ICE RINK - Encourage the City to become a partner for indoor ice rink activities to be offered to the residents of the community - offering expanded recreational activities and providing indoor ice for the school and association hockey programs. 5. PURSUE A FACILITY TO HOUSE RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES AND SOCIAL SERVICES FOR THE RESIDENTS OF THE COMMUNITY - Pursue the possibility of purchasing the Bel Rae to serve as a community center housing many services and activities for the community. 6. SOLICITE FUNDING FOR SUBSIDIZING PROGRAMS FOR LOW INCOME AND AT-RISK TEENS IN THE COMMUNITY - Prepare grants, look for .partnerships, request contributions for subsidizing programs for teens and low income youth, and pursue the possibilities of obtaining a facility for a teen drop-in center. // -7. USE PARK DEDICATION FUNDS TO INSTALL FENCIN YOUTH ATHLETIC FIELDS TO ENHANCE THE EAATHE ITIESII- S Fields that need fencing include Hillview, Groveland and City Hall. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 19' 4 NG TERM FINANCIAL PLAN in - Improvement DEPART/PROJECTDESCRIPTION RATIONALESOURCE 1997" 1998 1999 2000 2001 OF FUNDS PARK IMPROVEMENTS ** WOODCREST GARDEN BUILDING FOR ENHANCED USE OF SPACE 3,000 PICNIC TABLES&TRASH RECEPTICALS FOR ENHANCED USE OF SPACE PARK DEDICATION 1.000 1.000 1.000 GENERAL FUND AMENITIES FOR G.C.OPEN SPACE FOR ENHANCED USE OF SPACE 6G2='-- 1,000 1.000 1,000 GENERAL FUND EN SV FENCE#1 SAFETY GRFFNFIEI D PARK STUDY 11,000 GENERAL FUND FOR ENHANCED USE OF SPACE 8.000 GENERAL FUND CITY HAIL VB LIGHTING USER REQUEST HEIGHTEN SV FENCE#2 6+000 GENERAL FUND SAFETY 11,000 REPLACE CITY HALL FENCE REC ACTIVITY SAFETY 12,000:: PAVE GREENFIELD PATH ACCESSIBILITY PARK DEDICATION C jIEIGHTEN GREENFIELD FENCE SAFETY 12.000 GENERAL FUND REPLACE PLAY EQUIPMENT 12,000> GENERAL FUND REPLACE OUTMODED EQUIPMENT 20,000: 20,000 20,000 20,000 HU.LVIEW SAFETY FESAFETY NCING AT FIELDS 20,000 GENERAL FUND PARK DEDICATION `1997 MARKS THE END OF OUR ANNUAL PARK DEDICATION FROM 1HF.EVEREST DEVELOPMENT. =SEEKING GRANT FUNDING TOTAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS 537,000: $33,000 533.000 szzaoo $96,000 III • ID 1—bl —rtsti—ezi 8 CROWN FENCE & WIRE ,_ J (CROWN-) .1 i WfRI CROWN FENCE & WIRE COMPANY 5413 May 22, 1996 1987 X387 Mary Sarion City of Moundsview Park & Recreation 2401 Highway #10 Moundsview, Minnesota 55112-1499 Subject: Baseline Fencing Groveland Park Dear Mary Sarion:. We are pleased to offe $2420.00 as your net in= - for the following baseline fencing at subject - 150 Lin. ft. Style OTR 10 ' high fence Wire; 2"- 9 ga. x 120" galv. chain 1 _ Top, center & bottom rails; 1-5/8 " OL std. galv. pipe, 2.27#/ft. • Line posts; 2-3/8" OD std. galv. pipe 4 End posts; 2-7/8" OD std. galv. pipe, Terms, net 20 days. Delivery, one week. Sincerely, CR WN FENCE & W.. .31):21()))1 ,' : ' Pio ph Polnasz yjOA resident ;11)10iA4 y lk 410 �' •. LJWIN rtf4Lt & WIRE II! • )r` 0 rC R OWN) R //�' w�.�- CROWN FENC VE & WIRE _ -: IENCE r COM►lNY E. May 22, 1996 = >; . 1 q Mary Sarion City of Moundsview Park & Recreation 2401 Highway #10 Moundsview, Minnesota 55112-1499 Subject: Baseline Fencing Hillview Park Dear Mary Sarion: We are pleased to offer $2796.00 as your net in - _. for the following baseline encing at subject jc_-. : 180 Lin. ft. Style OTR 10 ' high fence Wire; 2"- 9 ga. x 120" galv. chain ?_ . Top, center & bottom rails; 1-5/8 " OE 4111std. gale. pipe, 2.27#/ft. Line posts; 2-3/8" OD std. galv. pipe _ 4 End posts ; 2-7/8" OD std. galv. pipe, Terms, net 20 days. Delivery, one week. Sincerely, CROWN FENCE & w_ i.., i f) /' ��2..: o ph Po'nasze:. resident III REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section IISTAFF REPORT Report Number: I / - W5 OgrAlig; Report Date: 7/3/96 WORK SESSION MEETING DATE July 8. 1996 IIII .,.. , Partner? o'iess* Item Description: Consideration of Purchasing Election Equipment Administrator's Review/Recommendation: Cf(:.) -No Comments to supplement this report -Comments attached. Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary) Summary: It is estimated that eighty percent of registered voters in Mounds View will be voting in the 1996 elections. Due to this large quantity of residents voting, the City's forty regular booths will not be an adequate amount to cover this number of voters. As a result, the City would like to purchase an additional five regular booths and five handicapped bo 'ns. The cost of each individual booth is $230- the total cost to equal $2,300. Because there were ze°:..) funds elllocated for capital outlay in the Elections Budget, it is asked that Council use contingency or ot'-ter fund onies to cover this cost. 04'4.(l1Lf 4. • Dawn Postudensek, Interim Deputy Clerk. •4110 CITY OF REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section STAFF REPORT Report Number: (MHOS Report Date: 7/3/96 (� WORKSESSION MEETING DATE o A U 47l't July 8 1996 °Nu'Partners l?s Item Description: Discussion Regarding Recycling Collection Administrator's Review/Recommendation: -No Comments to supplement this report -Comments attached. Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary) Summary: Due to the current recycling market, Ace Solid Waste has expressed some cor;;�. ;ygar-i:.b Lim •equire-nent of weekly collection of recycling materials. Disp ' f recyclable mat.- tin cans, has become a problem to garbage haulers. ire ane pas, ersv. 4-r c..Te paid for recyclabl?.. materials, presently haulers must pay to dispose of recyclables. In lWaldorf Corporation, the central recycling facility, is temporarily closed, which is causing haulers to store collected recyclables. This has an added expense to the haulers. • ce Solid Waste has suggested 2 options: (1)raising collection rates to diminish to additional expense of ring and disposal of recyclables; (2)require collection of recycling every other week instead of weekly. Y According to Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 603, "Garbage and Rubbish," curbside recycling collection shall be collected on a weekly basis. Communities such.as New Brighton, Fridley and Spring Lake Park provide collection every other week. Ace Solid waste is requesting the collection requirement to eve other week. A letter from Ace will be submitted to the Council Monday evening. Staff seeks direction ry regarding this matter. Ly`' ette Morgan, Administrative Aide