Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 2011/09/26CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MOUNDS VIEW CITY HALL Monday, September 26, 2011 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL: Flaherty, Stigney, Hull, Mueller, Gunn 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 5. PUBLIC INPUT: Citizens may speak to issues not on tonight’s agenda. Before speaking, please give your full name and address for the minutes. Also, please limit your comments to three minutes. 6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. 7:05pm Public Hearing to Consider Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 860, Amending Title 1200 of the Mounds View City Code Relating to the Review and Recordation of Plats and Minor Subdivisions and Plat Dedication Requirements and Amending Appendix E, Minimum Planning and Development Fees. B. Resolution 7830, Approving a Layout Configuration for On-Street Parking at Lambert Park C. Resolution 7829, Authorizing Step Increases for Police Officer Andrew Olson, Accountant Agnes Quasabart, and Public Service Officer Craig Swalchick D. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 864, an Ordinance Revising Chapter 1008 of the Mounds View City Code Relating to Dynamic Display Signs E. Resolution 7831, Authorizing Stantec Consulting Services Inc. to Perform Engineering Design Services and Prepare Bidding Documents for Area E of the Street and Utility Improvement Program 8. CONSENT AGENDA A. Set a Public Hearing for October 10, 2011 at 7:05 pm to Consider Special Assessments for Delinquent Utility Charges B. Set a Public Hearing for October 10, 2011, at 7:10 pm to Consider Special Assessments for Diseased Tree, Administrative Offense, False Alarm, and Unpaid Abatement Charges C. Set a Public Hearing for October 10, 2011, at 7:15 pm to Consider A Special Assessment for Unpaid Water Service Repairs 9. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS September 26, 2011 City Council Meeting Agenda Page 2 10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - None 11. REPORTS A. Reports of Mayor and Council B. Reports of Staff (1) Continued Discussion Regarding the Potential Addition of a Canine Unit within the Mounds View Police Department (verbal report) C. Reports of City Attorney 12. Next Council Work Session: Monday, October 3, 2011, at 7pm Next Council Meeting: Monday, October 10, 2011, at 7pm 13. ADJOURNMENT Item No: 7A Meeting Date: Sept 26, 2011 Type of Business: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: James Ericson, City Administrator Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing, Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 860, an Ordinance Revising Title 1200 of the Mounds View City Code relating to Subdivisions of Land Introduction: The City Council directed staff to review the subdivision regulations and propose new language to address repeated major subdivision reapprovals. Staff had suggested two primary changes--extending the amount of time within which a plat would need to be recorded from two months to six months, and, implementing a plat reapproval fee, both of which the Council supported. Staff asked the City Attorney to review the subdivision regulations and to propose any additional revisions that may be necessary. These changes were reviewed by the City Council on September 6, 2011 and the first reading of Ordinance 860 was held on September 12, 2011. Discussion: The first few changes proposed are needed to bring the Code current and to be consistent with State law. The Code would be updated to provide plats and minor subdivisions (certificates of survey) the same extended recording timeframe allowance of six months. In both cases, a reference is added to a new “reapproval fee” as specified in Appendix E. The Code is also proposed to be revised to include a requirement for the subdivider to provide a title commitment or title opinion as part of the application. The Attorney also recommends slight revisions to the park dedication requirements to ensure consistency with state law. Finally, the ordinance specifies the amount of the plat and minor subdivision reapproval fee in the amounts of $100 and $50, respectively. Recommendation: The proposed revisions have been prepared by the City Attorney to address the City Council’s desire to extend the timeframe by which plats and subdivisions are recorded, and at the same time, to institute a plat and subdivision reapproval fee. In addition, the City Attorney is proposing other changes to bring the subdivision regulations current and consistent with state law. After holding the public hearing, staff recommends Council approval of Ordinance 860. Action on the ordinance is by a roll call vote of the Council. Respectfully submitted, ________________________ James Ericson City Administrator 389566v3 SJS MU125-11 1 ORDINANCE NO. 860 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 1200, CHAPTERS 1201, 1202 AND 1204 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY CODE RELATING TO THE REVIEW AND RECORDATION OF PLATS AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS AND PLAT DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS AND AMENDING APPENDIX E, MINIMUM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FEES TO INSTITUTE A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND PLAT REAPPROVAL FEE SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby amends Title 1200, Chapter 1201, Section 1201.02, subdivision 1 of the Mounds View Municipal Code by adding the underlined material and deleting the stricken material as follows: Subd. 1. Based upon authority provided in Minnesota Statutes Section 462.358, subdivisions 1 through 10, every plat of land proposed within the City shall be submitted to the City Council for review and comment before being filed, and no plat of land shall be filed unless and until the same shall be approved by resolution of the City Council. The term “plat of land” for the purpose of this Title shall be deemed to include townhouse development, planned unit developments, and any apartment building, common area or land coming within the purview of the Minnesota Condominium Act. SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby amends Title 1200, Chapter 1202, Section 1202.01, Subdivisions 3 (a), 5 (a), 8, 9, 10 and 14 of the Mounds View Municipal Code by adding the underlined material and deleting the stricken material as follows: Subd. 3. Submittal Of Preliminary Plat Copies: a. Major Subdivisions. Before any official action shall be taken by the Municipality City, the subdivider shall submit fifteen (15) copies of a preliminary plat of the proposed subdivision to the City Administrator; eight (8) additional copies shall be submitted by the subdivider to the Ramsey County Plat Commission. The preliminary plat shall be in such form and contain such information as required in Section 1202.03 of this Chapter. Subd. 5. Review And Comment Submittals: a. Preliminary plats of major subdivisions shall be provided by the City Administrator for the purposes of review and comment to the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, City Attorney, County Engineer, if plat abuts a County road, and State Highway District having fifteen (15) days in which to submit their comments regarding the proposed subdivision to the Municipality City. The City 389566v3 SJS MU125-11 2 Administrator, Planning and Zoning Commission or Council may request the above authorities to similarly review and comment on the preliminary subdivision plan of any minor subdivision request whenever such review is deemed necessary to properly evaluate the request. Subd. 8. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: Within sixty (60) days of Upon receipt of the subdivision request and the City Administrator’s report, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend to the Council approval or disapproval of the subdivision. The Planning and Zoning Commission may withhold action to so recommend until the comments of the Rice Creek Watershed District have been received. Subd. 9. Public Hearing: Preliminary plats of major subdivisions shall require a public hearing. The Council shall conduct such hearing within at least thirty (30) days of upon receipt of the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation. The City Administrator shall cause notice of said hearing to be published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing and shall also cause a notice to be mailed to each of the owners of property within three hundred and fifty feet (350’) of the property being platted, such notices to be mailed to the last known address of such owners at least ten (10) days before the hearing. Subd. 10. Council Approval or Disapproval: The Council shall approve or disapprove the preliminary plat of a major subdivision or the surveyor’s certificate of a minor subdivision within sixty (60) days of after receipt of the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation. The Council shall consider this recommendation and any comments or objections brought forth during the public hearing or by the Municipal City’s consultants or other public agencies. Subd. 14. Minor Subdivision Recording Requirements: If the surveyor’s certificate of a minor subdivision is approved by the Council, the subdivider shall, within sixty (60) days six months, record a deed conforming to the terms of the Council’s approval of the subdivision with the County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles and, within ten (10) days of recording, furnish the City with a reproducible copy of the deed showing evidence of the recording; otherwise, the approval of the subdivision shall be void, and the City Administrator shall so notify the County Registrar of Deeds or Registrar of Titles. No building permit shall be issued for construction on a parcel created by such minor subdivision until evidence of recording has been submitted. In the event the deed is not recordable as approved or the subdivider fails to record within the time prescribed herein, the Council may re-approve the minor subdivision upon payment of the minor subdivision reapproval fee as specified in Appendix E and the following terms and conditions: a) that the subdivider proves to the satisfaction of the Council that the delay was caused by conditions beyond the control of the subdivider, and b) that the extension of time requested has or will have no adverse effect on the City or property owners of the City, and c) that the Council shall set the time limit of the extension requested but in no event shall it exceed six months. 389566v3 SJS MU125-11 3 SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby amends Title 1200, Chapter 1202, Section 1202.03, subdivision 4 of the Mounds View Municipal Code by adding the underlined material and deleting the stricken material as follows: Subd. 4. Other Information: a. Such other information or requirements as may be requested by the Planning and Zoning Commission, Council or City staff that are deemed necessary to preserve neighborhood aesthetics or to protect the health, safety and welfare of neighboring landowners and the future residents of the subdivision. b. Where the subdivider owns property adjacent to that which is being proposed for the subdivision, the Planning and Zoning Commission may require that the subdivider submit a preliminary plan of the remainder of the property to show the possible relationships between the proposed subdivision and future subdivisions. In any event, all subdivisions must be shown to relate well with existing or potential adjacent subdivisions. c. Submission of a title commitment or title opinion that establishes ownership of the land that is satisfactory to the City. SECTION 4. The City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby amends Title 1200, Chapter 1202, Section 1202.07, Subdivisions 1, 4 and 5 of the Mounds View Municipal Code by adding the underlined material and deleting the stricken material as follows: Subd. 1. Filing of Final Plat: The owner or subdivider of a major subdivision shall file twelve (12) printed copies, in addition to the necessary copies required by the Ramsey County Plat Commission, of the final plat not later than six (6) months after the date of approval of the preliminary plat; otherwise, the preliminary plat and final plat will be considered void unless an extension is requested, in writing, by the subdivider and for good cause granted by the Council. The final plat shall be in such form and contain such information as required in Section 1202.05 of this Chapter. Subd. 4. Recording of Final Plat: If the final plat is approved, the subdivider shall, within one hundred twenty (120) days six months, record it with the County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles and, within ten (10) days of recording, furnish the City with a reproducible copy of the final plat showing evidence of the recording; otherwise, the approval of the final plat shall be void, and the Clerk-City Administrator shall so notify the County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles. 389566v3 SJS MU125-11 4 Subd. 5. Re-Approval: In the event the plat is not recordable as approved or the subdivider fails to record within the time prescribed herein, the Council may re- approve the final plat upon payment of the plat reapproval fee as specified in Appendix E and the following terms and conditions: a) that the subdivider proves to the satisfaction of the Council that the delay was caused by conditions beyond the control of the subdivider, and b) that the extension of time requested has or will have no adverse effect on the City or property owners of the City, and c) that the Council shall set the time limit of the extension requested but in no event shall it exceed one hundred twenty (120) days six months. SECTION 5. The City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby amends Title 1200, Chapter 1202, Section 1201.09 of the Mounds View Municipal Code by adding the underlined material and deleting the stricken material as follows: 1201.09: 1202.09: COPIES OF PLATS: copies of all such plats of subdivisions, after the same have been submitted and approved as provided in these regulations, shall be filed and kept by the City Administrator among the records of Mounds View. SECTION 6. The City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby amends Title 1200, Chapter 1204, Section 1204.02 of the Mounds View Municipal Code by adding the underlined material and deleting the stricken material as follows: Subd. 1. Dedication Required: a. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.358, iIn all subdivisions to be developed for residential, commercial, industrial or other uses or as a planned development which includes residential, commercial and industrial uses or any combination thereof, a subdivider shall dedicate a reasonable portion of each the buildable land of the proposed subdivision to the public or to be preserved for public use as parks, recreational facilities, playgrounds, trails or public open space, wetlands or storm water holding areas or ponds or, at the option of the Municipality and at its sole discretion, the subdivider shall contribute an equivalent amount in cash based on the fair market value of the land. For purposes of this Section, “buildable land” means the gross acreage of the subdivision excluding designated wetlands and land set aside as open space in a manner approved by the City. b. The City may, at its option, require a cash contribution in lieu of dedication or require a portion of the required dedication be in land and a cash contribution in lieu for the balance thereof. Cash payments so received shall be placed in a special fund and used only for the acquisition and development or improvement of land for parks, recreational facilities, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, public open space and storm water holding areas or ponds, development of existing park and playground sites, public open space and storm water holding areas or ponds, redevelopment or rehabilitation of existing facilities or sites and or debt retirement in connection with 389566v3 SJS MU125-11 5 land previously acquired or improvements thereto previously constructed for such public purpose. No funds shall be used for ongoing operation or maintenance of existing parks or recreational facilities or sites. Expenses incurred by the City in acquiring such cash dedication may be deducted from said dedication before it is deposited in the Park and Playground Fund. c. In considering the portion to be dedicated or preserved or the amount of the cash contribution, Tthe Municipality City, at its sole discretion, may take into must give due consideration to the open space, park, recreational or common areas and facilities open to the public which the subdivider has reserved for the subdivision; except, that storm water holding areas or ponds, whether required by the Municipality City or any other regulatory body, may will not be taken into consideration. Subd. 2. Determination of Dedication Procedure: Upon receipt of a qualifying subdivision, the Council shall refer it to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Said Commission shall report to the Council its dedication recommendation. Upon receipt of the recommendation, the Council shall call for either a land dedication, or a cash payment or a combination of the two, in size, location or amount, as it determines. The Council may require a professional appraisal to determine market value for purposes of a cash payment, the cost of which shall be paid by the subdivider. Subd. 3. Credit for Existing Single-Family Dwelling: The subdivider of any parcel of land shall receive a credit for an existing single-family dwelling unit by excluding the acreage of the occupied parcel remaining after subdivision from the computation of dwelling units per acre if the parcel of land is zoned for single-family residence and has located thereon one single-family dwelling. Subd. 4. Dedication Amount: A reasonable portion of the land of any proposed subdivision or its equivalent in cash shall be dedicated by the subdivider for public use. Up to ten percent (10%) of the buildable land of the proposed subdivision or its equivalent in cash based on the fair market value shall constitute a reasonable portion for dedication purposes under this section. The exact portion of land or its equivalent amount in cash shall be established by the municipality City based on the following factors:  Type of the proposed subdivision land use: residential, industrial or commercial;  The need for open space generated by the proposed subdivision;  Existence of land dedicated for public use within the proposed subdivision, excluding areas reserved as storm water holding ponds;  Fair market value of the land;  Other relevant factors unique to a particular subdivision supporting the need for dedication of lands for public use. 389566v3 SJS MU125-11 6 If an equivalent amount in cash from the subdivider for part or the entire portion required to be dedicated it to be paid by the subdivider, such amount is due no later than at the time of final approval of the proposed subdivision. Subd. 5. Dedication for Re-Subdivision. For any subdivision of a parcel on which a cash dedication for parks has previously been made but on which an additional cash dedication is required due to re-subdivision, the amount of cash dedication required on the re-subdivided parcel(s) shall be based on the market value of the buildable land at the time of re-subdivision and the factors set forth in subdivision 4 of this Section less any applicable credit for the prior cash dedication. Subd. 6. Right of Appeal: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 462.358 and 462.361 a subdivider may appeal the imposition of a dedication fee to the district court within sixty (60) days of the approval of the subdivision application. The subdivider must give written notice to the municipality City regarding a proposed fee dispute prior to the final decision on the proposed subdivision. Upon receiving the notice, the municipality City shall place the disputed fee amount in an escrow and shall continue processing the subdivision application as if the fee had been paid. The municipality City will must not condition the approval of any proposed subdivision on the subdivider’s waiver of the right to challenge the dedication fee. If the subdivider fails to appeal the dedication fee within sixty (60) days of the subdivision approval, or if the subdivider does not prevail on the appeal, the funds paid into escrow will be transferred to the municipality City. SECTION 7. The City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby amends Appendix E of the Mounds View Municipal Code by adding a “Minor Subdivision Reapproval Fee” and a “Plat Reapproval Fee” to the Minimum Planning and Development Fees, as follows: Minor Subdivision Reapproval Fee……….…$50 Plat Reapproval Fee ………………………… $100 SECTION 8. In accordance with Section 3.07 of the City Charter, City staff shall have the following summary printed in the official City newspaper in lieu of the complete ordinance: On September 26, 2011, the City Council adopted Ordinance 860 that amends Chapters 1201, 1202 and 1204 of the Mounds View City Code to extend the amount of time, from 120 days to six months, within which a plat or a minor subdivision deed must be recorded with Ramsey County. A minor subdivision reapproval fee of $50 and a plat reapproval fee of $75 were added to Appendix E of the City Code to cover the costs of processing plat and minor subdivision reapproval requests. The requirement that a plat must be submitted to the Ramsey County Plat Commission has been removed from Chapter 1202. A provision was added to Chapter 1202 that requires a preliminary plat applicant to 389566v3 SJS MU125-11 7 submit a title commitment or title opinion that establishes ownership of the property. The deadlines for approval of a preliminary plat were changed in Section 1202.01 to reflect statutory requirements. Dedication requirements in Section 1204.02 were amended so that they reflect the recent statutory changes. A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection during regular business hours at Mounds View City Hall and is available on line at the City’s web site located at www.ci.mounds-view.mn.us. SECTION 9. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage and publication, in accordance with Section 3.09 of the City Charter. Introduction and First Reading by the Mounds View City Council on September 12, 2011. Second Reading and Adoption by the Mounds View City Council on September 26, 2011. Publication Date: October 6, 2011. Joe Flaherty, Mayor Attest: ______________________________ James Ericson City Administrator (seal) Item No: 07C Meeting Date: September 26, 2011 Type of Business: CB Administrator Review : ____ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Desaree Crane, Assistant City Administrator Item Title/Subject: Resolution 7829, Approving Step Increases for Officer Andrew Olson, Accountant Agnes Quasabart, and Public Service Officer Craig Swalchick Background: Police Officer Andrew Olson is a current employee with the Mounds View Police Department. His supervisor, Sergeant Zender, has reviewed his performance as it relates to his responsibilities outlined in the job description. Accountant Agnes Quasabart is a current employee with the City of Mounds View. Her supervisor, Finance Director Mark Beer, has reviewed her performance as it relates to her responsibilities outlined in the job description. Public Service Officer (PSO) Craig Swalchick is a current employee with the City of Mounds View. His supervisor, Police Chief Kinney, has reviewed his performance as it relates to his responsibilities outlined in the job description. Discussion: It was determined that Officer Andrew Olson has satisfactory performed in the capacity of his position, and therefore, a step wage adjustment is consistent with the LELS Police Officers Labor Agreement. It was determined that Accountant Agnes Quasabart has satisfactorily performed in the capacity of her position, and therefore, a step wage adjustment is consistent with the AFSCME Union Contract. It was determined that PSO Craig Swalchick has satisfactorily performed in the capacity of his position, and therefore, a step wage adjustment is consistent with the AFSCME Union Contract. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Resolution 7829, approving the listed step increases. Respectfully Submitted, __________________________ Desaree Crane Assistant City Administrator RESOLUTION 7829 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING STEP WAGE ADJUSTMENTS WHEREAS, the following below are employees who are currently working for the City of Mounds View; and WHEREAS, their supervisors reviewed their performance as it relates to the responsibilities outlined in the job description; and WHEREAS, their supervisors determined that the following employees below have satisfactorily performed in the capacity of their positions documented in their performance review on file; and WHEREAS, wage adjustments are consistent with the Mounds View Personnel Manual and Labor Agreements. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council does hereby approve a wage adjustment to the following indicated in the chart. NAME CURRENT POSITION DATE OF EMPLOYMENT/ CURRENT POSITION CURRENT STEP & WAGE STEP & WAGE ADJUSTMENT EFFECTIVE DATE OF ADJUSTMENT Andrew Olson MV Police Officer (Full Time) April 25, 2011 Step 1: $20.70/hour Step 2: $22.29/hour October 25, 2011 Agnes Quasabart Accountant (Full Time) April 4, 2011 Step 1: $24.84/hour Step 1.5: $25.62/hour October 4, 2011 Craig Swalchick PSO (3/4 Time) October 26, 2010 Step 2: $13.52/hour Step 3: $14.32/hour October 26, 2011 Adopted this 26th day of September, 2011. __________________________________ Joe Flaherty, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ James Ericson, City Administrator (seal) Item No: 07D Meeting Date: Sept 26, 2011 Type of Business: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: James Ericson, City Administrator Item Title/Subject: First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 864, an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1008 of the Mounds View Municipal Code Pertaining to Dynamic Display Signs Introduction: The City amended its sign code on January 12, 2009 to include operational requirements and conditions for the use of dynamic display signage with the adoption of Ordinance 816. The ordinance instituted several regulations regarding such signs as well as creating a conversion process by which billboard companies could install a dynamic display billboard face if it removed two-full faces elsewhere in the community. The City Council discussed potential revisions at its work session on September 6, 2011. Discussion: Since the adoption of the ordinance in 2009, it has become evident that that the amount of time that each unique message must be held on dynamic signs was more than necessary. The intent of the ten second hold requirement was to prevent the sign’s message from becoming a distraction to motorists. It has become clear that the hold time is much longer than it needs to be. As a means to assess a more appropriate hold time, messages on the City Hall sign rotate every three seconds after spending a couple weeks rotating on a four second basis. The three second hold time does not appear to rotate too quickly or pose a distraction. In addition to the minimum hold requirement, the Code also provide an allowance for dynamic signs where the background must be held for ten seconds but secondary graphics were allowed to blend in and out of the message in a soft transition. This allowance has been utilized by one area business without incident or complaint. For this reason as well, staff believes the ten-second hold requirement could be reduced to allow for faster transition between sign impressions without adversely affecting public safety. The proposed hold time reflected in the attached ordinance is three seconds. Billboards In the time that has passed since Ordinance 816 was adopted in 2009, many dynamic display billboards have been erected in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Staff is not aware of any incidents or complaints arising from such signs, and it would seem that many of the original concerns expressed regarding such signs have not come to fruition. The Council discussed this point at the August work session and expressed interest in revising the City Code to be more permissive, as the present requirements effectively discourage conversion of a billboard to a dynamic display. Dynamic Display Sign Regulations Sept 26, 2011 Page 2 The two factors that have effectively prevented the erection of a dynamic display billboard are the hold time and the conversion requirement. According to the City Code, the hold time for each billboard display impression is fifteen seconds. The billboard industry standard for hold time (they call it “dwell” time) is eight seconds. Regarding the conversion requirement, the Code indicates that for each one dynamic face converted, two static faces must be removed. Given the economics associated with outdoor advertising and the length of time the structures must be maintained to amortize the original cost of construction, both issues--the dwell time and the two-for-one conversion requirement— have proven to be insurmountable impediments. What the City Code does NOT presently address, however, is a location requirement for dynamic display billboards. The proposed language indicates that dynamic display billboards may ONLY be located fronting Interstate 35W and only by permit issued by the City. The proposed revisions also include a provision to quantifiably limit the brightness of such signs. Recommendation: Staff City Council consideration of the first reading and introduction of Ordinance 864, an ordinance amending Chapter 1008 of the Mounds View Municipal Code relating to dynamic Display billboards/ the Second reading and adoption, if the first reading is approved, will be scheduled presently for October 10, 2011. Respectfully submitted, ________________________ James Ericson City Administrator ORDINANCE NO. 864 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1008 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY CODE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF DYNAMIC DISPLAY SIGNS SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby amends Title 1000, Chapter 1008, Section 1008.10, Subdivision 9 of the Mounds View Municipal Code by adding the underlined material and deleting the stricken material as follows: Subd. 9. Dynamic Display Signs: a. Findings: Studies, such as “Dynamic Signage: Research Related to Driver Distraction and Ordinance Recommendations” prepared by SRF Consulting Group, Inc., dated June 7, 2007 for the City of Minnetonka, Minnesota, have shown there is a correlation between dynamic displays on signs and distraction of motor vehicle drivers. As such, the City of Mounds View adopts these standards and regulations to protect the health, safety, welfare, image and aesthetics of the City. b. The City allows noncommercial dynamic display signs wherever the City allows commercial dynamic display signs. Such signs are subject to the same standards and total maximum allowances per site or building of each sign type specified in this Chapter. b c. Standards for all dynamic display signs: (1) The images and messages displayed on the sign must be static, complete in themselves, without continuation in content to any other sign. The messages, content and images on all such displays shall not flash or blink and shall not include any video images or content. (2) No person or contractor shall install a dynamic display sign that because of its position, shape, movement or color, interferes with the proper functioning of a traffic sign, signal or that constitutes a traffic hazard. (3) All dynamic display signs shall have ambient light monitors and shall, at all times, allow such monitors to automatically adjust the brightness level of the sign based on light conditions. (4) The manufacturers, owners and operators of dynamic display signs must design and equip such signs with a fully functional monitoring off switch system that automatically shuts the sign off or will freeze the device or sign in one (1) position; if a malfunction occurs. The signs and displays also must be equipped with a means to shut off or discontinue the display if it malfunctions. The sign owner or operator must stop or shut off the dynamic display within one (1) hour or as soon as reasonably possible of the City notification that the sign is not meeting the standards of this Section of Chapter. Ordinance 864 Page 2 (5) All dynamic display signs shall meet the following brightness standards: (a) No sign shall be brighter than is necessary for clear and adequate visibility. (b) No sign shall be of such intensity or brilliance as to impair the vision of a motor vehicle driver with average eyesight nor shall such a sign interfere with the driver’s operation of a motor vehicle in any way or manner. (c) No sign may be of such intensity or brilliance that it interferes with the effectiveness of an official traffic sign, device or signal. (d) The person owning or controlling a sign with a dynamic display shall adjust the sign to meet the brightness standards according to the City’s instructions. The sign owner or operator shall adjust the sign within one (1) hour or as soon as reasonably possible upon notice of non-compliance from the City. (e) All dynamic display signs installed after December 31, 2008, shall be equipped and operated with an ambient light monitor or a mechanism that automatically adjusts the brightness level of the sign in response to light conditions. These signs also shall be equipped with a means to turn off immediately the display or lighting if the sign malfunctions, and the sign owner or operator must turn off the sign or lighting within one (1) hour or as soon as reasonably possible after the City notifies the owner or operator that the sign is not meeting the standards of this Section or Chapter. (f) In addition to the brightness standards required above, dynamic display signs shall meet the City’s lighting requirements as listed in Section 1103.09 (Glare) of the City Code. c d. The City allows dynamic display signs on on-site freestanding or ground signs subject to Section Chapter 1008.10, subdivision 1 (Ground Signs) of the City Code, the above-mentioned standards for all dynamic display signs, and subject to the following additional conditions: (1) The owners or operators of such signs shall not use messages, content or images that flash or blink. (2) The images or messages on such signs shall not include any video images or content. (3) Such signs may be located only in the Limited Business (B-2), Highway Business (B-3), Regional Business (B-4) or Commercial Planned Unit Developments (PUD’s) zoning districts. (4) Such signs may be located on the sites of schools, churches, places of worship or other institutional land uses, subject to the following additional conditions: (a) City Council approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) as outlined in Section 1106.04 and Section 1125.01, subdivision 3 of the City Code. Ordinance 864 Page 3 (b) Such signs shall not cause glare, disturbance or other problems to any residential properties or land uses. (5) The owner or operator of a dynamic display sign shall control and display the primary or background images and messages on the sign so they maintain each display for a minimum of ten (10) three (3) seconds. The City allows images, messages or content on such signs that are static, with secondary or accessory animation or movement that floats in, out, or across the primary message or those that have soft transitions. (6) The City allows dynamic displays as part of a permanent freestanding or ground sign, only if the dynamic display part of the sign comprises no more than fifty (50) square feet of the sign area or fifty percent (50%) of the total square footage of said sign face, whichever is less. (7) Such signs may only display and advertise information about products, events, persons, institutions, activities, businesses, services, or subjects that are located on the premises or on the site or only to provide public service or community service information. (8) Such signs must meet all other City location and setback requirements. d e. The City allows off-site dynamic display signs subject to Section 1008.10, subdivision 6 (Billboards) of the City’s Code, the above-mentioned standards for all dynamic display signs, and the following operational standards and additional conditions: (1) The images and messages displayed on the billboard must be static and each display must be maintained for a minimum of fifteen (15) eight (8) seconds. The transition from one (1) static display to another must be instantaneous and without any special effects or videos. (2) Only billboards located adjacent to Interstate 35W may be retrofit to a dynamic display, and only subsequent to a building permit issued by the City. One hundred percent (100%) of the sign face may be used for dynamic display. The owner of the billboard shall apply to the City for and the City shall issue a permit to retrofit up to one hundred percent (100%) of one (1) sign face of an existing billboard structure with a dynamic display if the responsible person, applicant or contractor meets all the following requirements: (a) The applicant or contractor may only convert one (1) sign face on a billboard structure per request. (b) The applicant or sign owner agrees in writing to the permanent removal of two (2) billboard sign surfaces or faces in Mounds View within thirty (30) days after the City issues the permit for each dynamic display surface. The required removals shall include the complete removal of the billboard structure and foundation supporting each removed sign surface or sign face. The applicant must agree that the City may remove the sign structure and surfaces if the applicant does not do so, and the permit application must identify the sign surfaces to be removed and the applicant shall submit to the City a cash deposit, letter of credit or other form of financial security acceptable to the City Attorney Ordinance 864 Page 4 sufficient to pay the City’s costs for that removal. The applicant also must agree that they are removing the sign surfaces voluntarily, that the applicant or owner has no right to compensation from any governmental unit for the removed sign surfaces under any law and that the applicant or owner has no right to rebuild or relocate the billboard elsewhere in Mounds View. Replacement of an existing sign surface of a billboard with a dynamic display sign does not constitute a removal of a sign surface. (c) If the removed sign surface is one that the state required a state permit, the applicant must surrender its permit to the state upon removal of the sign surface. The sign that is the subject of the dynamic display sign permit cannot be turned on or begin to operate until the sign owner or operator provides proof to the City that the state permit has been surrendered. (d) The billboard removal must be complete and inspected by the City before the owner or operator turns on or puts into operation the dynamic display sign. (3) Dynamic Display billboards shall not operate at a brightness level of more than 0.3 foot candles above ambient light, as measured at a distance of 250 feet. (4) (e) Public Safety. If City staff determines that a dynamic display sign is not being operated pursuant to this Chapter due to its location or display capabilities, City staff can require the sign owner or operator to move, remove or modify the sign after the City notifies the property owner or operator about the operational issues. (3) Mounds View intends the provisions of this Chapter and Sections about billboards to provide an incentive option for the voluntary and uncompensated removal of off-site signs or billboards. The City bases these provisions on the recognition that the incentive creates an opportunity to consolidate outdoor advertising signs and services that would otherwise remain in Mounds View. SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 3.07 of the City Charter, City staff shall have the following summary printed in the official City newspaper in lieu of the complete ordinance: On October 10, 2011, the City Council adopted Ordinance 864 that amends Section 1008.10 of the Mounds View City Code to reduce the amount of time that messages must be maintained on dynamic display signs from ten seconds to three seconds for on-premises signs and from fifteen seconds to eight seconds for off-premises signs (billboards.) In addition, the ordinance eliminated the provision which required two billboard faces to be removed for every one billboard face converted to a dynamic display, and restricted dynamic billboard faces to locations adjacent to I-35W. A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection during regular business hours at Mounds View City Hall and is available on line at the City’s web site located at www.ci.mounds-view.mn.us. Ordinance 864 Page 5 SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage and publication, in accordance with Section 3.09 of the City Charter. Introduction and First Reading by the Mounds View City Council on September 26, 2011. Second Reading and Adoption by the Mounds View City Council on October 10, 2011. Publication Date: October 20, 2011 Joe Flaherty, Mayor Attest: ______________________________ James Ericson City Administrator (seal) 392084v2 SJR MU125-11 Kennedy 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402-1458 (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax http://www.kennedy-graven.com Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer Graven C H A R T E R E D SCOTT J. RIGGS Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9260 Email: sriggs@kennedy-graven.com MEMORANDUM Date: September 22, 2011 To: Jim Ericson, City Administrator From: Scott J. Riggs, City Attorney Re: Mounds View Project Status Report MU125-11: Administration. General discussions with staff regarding various City matters. Work on draft code amendments to the City Code regarding variances and forward draft amendments to City Staff. Review subdivision requirements from the City Code and begin drafting amendment to subdivision requirements. Consult with City staff regarding same. Consult with City staff regarding proposed amended code. Consult with City staff regarding K-9 programs and funding sources. Consult with City Staff regarding prosecution diversion programs. Review resolution regarding Equipment Certificates to be issued by the City of Blaine and a Supplement to the Joint Powers Agreement for the SBM fire dept. Matters are presently pending. MU125-65: Licensing Matters. Consult with City staff regarding tobacco product shop moratorium ordinance. Matter is presently pending. MU210-31: City Hall Renovations. Review reroofing contract documents and provide comments to City staff. Consult with City staff regarding certificate of insurance issues. Matter is presently pending. MU210-54: City Code Update/Revisions. Revise and update City Code. Consult with City staff regarding revisions, questions, etc. Matter is presently pending. & Mr. Jim Ericson September 22, 2011 Page 2 392084v2 SJR MU125-11 MU210-106: Labor Issues. Consult with City staff regarding recording requirements for closed sessions in which labor negotiations are discussed. Matter is presently pending. MU210-164: Franchise Matters. Consult with City staff regarding Xcel franchise. Matter is presently pending. MU210-166: Billboard Matters. Review question regarding dynamic billboards and proposed revisions to City Code. Consult with City staff regarding same. Matter is presently pending. MU210-189: Coventry Senior Living Project. Review final plat and other documentation. Consult with City staff regarding same. Matter is presently pending. MU210-192: Senior Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 2010 (Select Senior Living). The temporary bonds that were issued and expected to be refunded with permanent bonds in 2011 have been defeased. Matter is presently pending. MU210-195: Lambert Park Shelter Project. Review Lambert Park Shelter contract documents and materials and provide comments to City staff. Consult with City staff. Matter is presently pending. MU210-196: Minor subdivision: 7337 Spring Lake Road. Review preliminary documentation. Consult with City staff. Matter is presently pending. SJR:jms