Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1997/05/05 � SIO AGENDA MAY � 1997 410 • prn� Items Discussed Per Consensus 1. Discussion on Consideration to Purchase a New Waste Oil Tank. Staff Report No. 97-2075WS (Presented by:Mike Ulrich, Director of Public Works) 2. Discussion to Review Appraisal for City Owned Land behind 7870 Woodlawn Drive. Staff Report No. 97-2076WS (Presented by: Cathy Bennett, Director of Economic Development ) 3. Discussion of Point-of-Sale Inspection Program. Staff Report No. 97- 2077WS (Presented by:Pam Sheldon, Director of Community Development) 4. Discussion of Revisions to Housing Code (Section 1005). Staff Report No. 97-2079WS (Presented by: Pam Sheldon, Director of Community Development) 5. Discussion Regarding Intoxicating Liquor License Ordinance Amendment. Staff Report No. 97-2080WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) • 6. Discussion RegardingPersonnel Committee Proposal. Staff Report No. 97-2081WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) s 7. Discussion of Revisions to Fee Schedule for Community Development. Staff Report No. 97-2082WS (Presented by:Pam Sheldon, Director of Community Development) 8. Discussion of Revisions to R-5 District (Manufactured Home Parks). Staff Report No. 97-2083WS (Presented by:Pam Sheldon, Director of Community Development) 9. Proposal for Revising Wetland Zoning Regulations (Section 1010). Staff Report No. 97-2084WS (Presented by:Pam Sheldon, Director of Community Development) • 10. Proposed Budget Calendar. Staff Report No. 97-2085WS (Presented by: Bruce Kessel, Director of Finance) • 11. Review of Children's Home Society Agreement, VB Digs Agreement, Community Ed Agreement and Construction Management Agreement for the Bel Rae. Staff Report No. 97-2086WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 12. Review of Related Bel Rae Construction Matters. Staff Report No. 97- 2087WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) • 13. Review of MAC Meeting. Staff Report No. 97-2088WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 14. Discussion of Resetting Council-Staff Team Building Session. Staff Report No. 97-2089WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 15. Discussion of City Flood Assistance. Staff Report No. 97-2090WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 16. Discussion of City Emergency Tree Removal Policy. Staff Report No. 97- 2091WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 17. Discussion of Surplus Property Disposal. Staff Report No. 97-2092WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) Memo To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator Re: May 5, 1997 City Council Work Shop Date: May 2, 1997 As expected, we have several items for the agenda Monday evening. Here's a brief run down. Item 1: New Waste Oil Tank: Mike will report on this item. Item 2: Appraisal of City Property behind 7870 Woodlawn Drive: This is in reference to the City owned property inquired about by neighboring property owners to extend their rock garden. While the Council discussed having an appraisal done of this property and possible offering to the neighbors, it was not left clear to me as to whether the Council had any interest in developing the property somehow. Also, the Council may want to consider whether the disposition of this property sets precedence for disposition of other properties. Item 3: Point of Sale Inspection Program: Interest in this has developed from Towns Edge Terrace • residents concerned about the quality of mobile homes coming into their park. Don Hereaux and others from the park will be present Monday evening to sit in on the discussion. Item 4: Revisions to Housing Code: Pam Sheldon will report on this. Item 5: Intoxicating Liquor License Ordinance Amendment: This item will be an attempt to simplify the public hearing process regarding temporary liquor licenses. Item 6: Personnel Committee Proposal: Since November, staff has been reviewing the possibility of establishing a personnel committee in order to improve employee communications, teamwork and moral. Having done similar committees elsewhere, = have been meeting with consultants who facilitate such interactions. In the packet is information,!garding this and who we have talked with, and I will discuss it more with you Monday. Item 7: Revisions to Fee Schedule for Community Development: Staff has had some discussion regarding the fact that the amount of time and cost associated with some development applications have little if any relation to the fee the City assesses for the application. Pam will discuss this with the Council on Monday. This discussion may also be particularly relevant to the upcoming budget discussions. Items 8 and 9: Revisions to R-5 District and Wetland Zoning Regulations: Pam will discuss these items with the Council. In an attempt to make staffs work more cost effective, I have been • asking department heads to review the processes and regulations under which they work for areas which if changed could ease up the work load for employees and staff without necessarily losing the intent of the method or rule as far as the community is concerned. These are two which could help. • Item 10: Proposed Budget Calendar: Bruce has worked up a calendar scheduling the time frame to develop the 1998 budget. This will obviously be an important budget for this Council, and staff is attempting to be as prepared as possible for the mechanics of the process. Bruce and I can go over this in more detail on Monday,but I would like the Council to begin thinking about two or three top priorities that the budget should address so as to give myself and staff an indication of your expectations. Item 11: Review of Bel Rae Agreements: The final draft agreements are in your packet. The VB Digs agreement is the largest and most complicated as would be expected. In addition, the Community Ed and Children's Home Society agreements are enclosed and are more straight forward. Also, negotiation agreements are enclosed as is a construction manager agreement. Bob Long will be present to review the details and respond to questions. Given all that is presented, the intention is to have these on the May 12 agenda for Council adoption. Item 12: Review of Related Bel Rae Construction Matters: Also enclosed is a letter from the architect outlining the City's need to have soil borings taken for the project site. These types of actions will be needed as this project progresses. Later today (Friday) I will be meeting with the architect again to review some aspects of the project and what the City or the tenants have to do, and I can update the Council on that Monday evening. Item 13: Review of MAC Meeting: The Mayor, Bob Long and myself met with MAC officials and Geri Evan on Wednesday regarding our proposed legislation. We can again update the Council on that meeting Monday evening. Item 14: Resetting Council-Staff Team Building Session: We were not able to conduct the team building session on April 23 as planned. Perhaps the Council would like to discuss another date to meet. Item 15: Discussion of City Flood Assistance: Cities around the state are being asked if any services or funds could be offered to the cities devastated by the floods of the past month. I am asking department heads to determine what if anything could be made available for clean up efforts. If the City can do something, I will discuss the options with the Council Monday night. Item 16: Emergency Tree Removal Policy: This was an issue last year after the wind storm effected a couple of neighborhoods. I was directed by the Council then to work up a new policy for removing trees and branches should such a thing happen again. I have copied the work done to date and I will talk with you more about it on Monday for this Council's feel on the matter. Item 17: Discussion of Surplus Property: This was also an old item I have been trying to address for a while. I would like some simplified standardized way of getting rid of surplus City property (items not real estate)that accumulate over time in the City. A consistent procedure to ridding the City of stuff is my main concern as I explained in an old staff memo. Friday, employees spent the day .111 cleaning and identifying stuff at City Hall in hopes of getting rid of it. Getting rid of stuff is never simple, and I will talk more Monday about a draft policy for doing so. • That's about it for now regarding the agenda. To date, only the Mayor and myself have signed up for the League conference in St. Cloud. Even we couldn't get in the good motels, so if there are more Council members interested in going, better contact us soon to get housing space. Also, to date I have not received any of my performance evaluations back. If Council members could take a few minutes to make comments, I would appreciate it. Finally, I will be at the annual managers conference in Brainerd next Wednesday, Thursday and Friday, so my May 12 commentary for the Council meeting will be slim if exist at all. My items will be those on the May 5 work session agenda. Have good weekend and see you Monday night. • Item No. Staff Report No. q`1-X075 f dS Meeting Date: May 5, 1997 • Type of Business: W.K. WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA: Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works Item Title/Subject: Consideration to Purchase Waste Oil Tank Date of Report: May 1, 1997 In 1996 staff purchased and installed two waste oil heaters for the Public Works Facility. When the addition was constructed for the building a 500 gallon waste oil tank was buried outside the building for use by the general public and maintenance facility. Installed with the waste oil heaters, was an additional 660 gallon tank inside the building. The City's total storage capacity is 1,160 gallons. At the beginning of the 1966 winter season both of these tanks were full. Through approximately the first two months of the heating season, the sole heat source for the building, except the office area, was provided by the waste oil heaters. Utilizing our waste oil resource saved the City approximately $700 to $1,000 per month for that period. Unfortunately we depleted our supply of waste oil. Small amounts of oil were deposited throughout the winter and were utilized basc,d on the availability. The usage of the waste oil dump site is predominantly in the summer months. With the limited storage capacity currently in place, we cannot accumulate enough fuel to supply heat for the majority of the heating season. The current underground tank does not lend itself to efficient maintenance and is subject to increasingly more stringent regulations. Spill containment and over fill protection have been installed, which prevents the accumulation of sludge from being removed. Staff is recommending abandoning the 500 gallon underground tank and installing an aboveground 2,000 gallon tank. Staff has consulted with vendors to explain the City's application, regulatory considerations and expense estimates. It is estimated that$2,000.00 will be required to abandon the current underground tank. This expenditure is very likely to occur in the future due to stricter regulations. Installing a new 2,000 gallon aboveground tank will cost approximately $9,200.00. This additional capacity should provide a sufficient fuel supply for the majority of the heating season. The payback for the additional tank is estimated to be 2 to 3 years. Staff is requesting contingency funds from Water, Wastewater and General funds for this expenditures. Total amount of the project and requested funds would not exceed $11,200.00, and would be transferred into Account nos. 100-4460-703, Fleet Services - Building and Grounds, • 7.00-4123-703 Water Infrastructure and Equipment Maintenance, 730-4123-703 Wastewater Infrastructure and Equipment Maintenance. Should Council approve this project, staff requests proceeding as soon as possible, to avoid vendor pick up of oil beyond our storage capacity. City of Mounds View Staff Report May 1, 1997 Page 2 Should Council have any questions regarding this project, please feel free to call me. I r/ (7/ Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works . Item No. A Staff Report No. g'7- 7/p WS Meeting Date , 4-7-97 Type of Business WK WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;EDAB:EDA Business Mounds View Economic Development Authority Work Session Staff Report To: Mounds View Economic Development Authority From: Cathy Bennett, Director of Economic Development Item Title/Subject: Status Regarding Resident Request to Purchase Land Date of Report: May 1, 1997 Dianne and James Cline, 7870 Woodlawn Drive offered to purchase City owned land behind their home for$1,500 in March. Staff's recommendation at that time was not sell the property in case the City, at some time in the future, has an opportunity to work with a developer to create a subdivision in this area. A possible alternative was suggested that the land be leased to the Clines for a nominal fee per year. The lease arrangement would allow the Cline's to use the land for garden space and an extended backyard. . Staff was directed to have the land appraised to figure out its market value if there was access to the parcel. J. Brown&Associates have appraised the land at$17,000. The value was based on the Sales Approach for similar land lots in the area and deducting the estimated amount that it would take to provide access to the site off of Hillview. (See attached summary and conclusions) The EDA purchased the property from Ramsey County on May 13, 1997 for price of$1,500 plus $99.45 in fees. The City currently owns most of the right of way that would allow for the construction of a cul-de-sac off of Hillview Drive and it was determined by staff that these lots would be big enough for the construction of new standard single family homes. I have contacted the Cline's regarding the appraisal results and have invited them to the work session. Staff is awaiting direction from the EDA regarding this matter. • J. Brown &Associates Appraisal House Appraisal of Land, Mounds View, Minnesota Summary of Salient Facts and Conclusions Legal Description: Lot 8, Block 3, Gustafsons Third Addition Date of Appraisal (inspection) April 23, 1997 Ownership City of Mounds View Land Area 83' x 134.03' (Approximately 11 ,124.5 sq ft) Zoning R-1 , Residential Highest and Best Use Developed as a Single Family Residential Site Improvements None, vacant land Value Indicators: Cost Approach N/A Sales Comparison Approach $17,000 Income Approach N/A • Value Conclusion: $17,000 Comments: The subject site is part of the property presently owned by the City of Mounds View, and has been appraised as a vacant parcel of land that is landlocked, but that a 60' right- of-way is possible and feasible to permit development. • J. Brown &Associates Appraisal House Appraisal of Land, Mounds View, Minnesota 17. Interpretation and Correlation of Estimates • The three approaches to value have been considered in this appraisal. The first consideration is the Cost Approach. This appraisal is for land only therefore the cost approach was not used. The Income Approach is usually considered as the third approach to value. Again this has not been considered since the appraisal is for land only and no rent is obtainable. The Sales Comparison Approach is the second method of appraising property and in this appraisal is the best method. In this approach a number of comparable sales have been analyzed and compared to the subject property to reflect an Estimated Value of $28,258 Cost to Develop The typical developer's cost, in the subject's area, to develop a right-of-way is approxi- mately $100.00 per front foot. The Highest and Best Use and The Most Profitable Use is, as stated earlier in this report, to develop the subject and adjoining land as single family residential sites. The development of a cul-de-sac and 400' of right-of-way from Hillview Road would provide the potential of 7 buildable sites. 400' x 2 = 800' of road frontage x $100.00 (development cost/front foot ) = $80,000. $80,000 divided by 7 sites equals ($11 ,428) the cost to develop each available site. Conclusion: The subject contains approximately 11 ,125 square feet and, with the assumption that the right-of-way is paved and all utilities are available to the site, the site would have a value of: 11,125 sq ft x $2.54 = $28,257.50 (minus development cost) $28,258 - $11 ,428 = $16,830 Rounded to $17,000.00 Reconciliation The estimated market value of the subject as of April 23, 1997 (date of inspection) is: • $17,000 Seventeen thousand dollars Item No. Staff Report No. 9'0/077 IU5 Meeting Date: May 5, 1997 Type of Business: Work Session WK:Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Discussion of Point-of-Sale Inspection Program Date of Report: May 2, 1997 Summary: The City has received a request from Don Hereau, representing residents in the Towns Edge Mobile Home Park, asking that a point-of-sale inspection program be instituted in Mounds View (see attached letter). The concern expressed by Mr. Hereau is that there is pattern of selling substandard mobile homes to unsuspecting buyers in Towns Edge Terrace. These mobile homes tend to be a blight on the mobile home park, because the seller does only cosmetic repairs and the buyers do not have the financial ability to repair the more serious problems, which then leads to the mobile home being resold or abandoned. The question before City Council is whether you want an ordinance prepared which would institute a point-of-sale inspection program in Mounds View which would include the mobile home parks. • Discussion: There are several issues related to this request raised by City Attorney. First, any program instituted would have to apply to all units sold in Mounds View and not be limited to the mobile home parks. So City Council must consider if you want to institute a city-wide program. Second, Minnesota State Law includes a requirement that a"safety feature disclosure form"be provided by a seller to the prospective buyer, for in-park sales of mobile homes(see Section 327C.07 Subd. 3.a., Subd. 4 and Subd. 8 which is attached). The City Attorney feels that State Law may preempt a local inspection program at the time of sale, because of the detailed procedure set forth in State law. Mr. Long felt it may be possible for the City to require that a copy of the safety feature disclosure form be filed with the City, so we know that it has been completed. He would want to research further if the City could require inspection of other items at the time of sale. Staff contacted Carol Mueller at Colonial Village, and she said that this form is being done for mobile homes sold in that park. We contacted Larry Vogt who handles enforcement of requirements on mobile home sales for the State. He said that the dealer's license held by the owner of Towns Edge Terrace had been revoked at one time because of failure to follow this procedure. The situation was corrected, but he did not know the current situation. The City Council may want to send a letter to Mr. Vogt asking for an investigation into whether Towns Edge Terrace is complying with State law. The procedure in State law requires the buyer to do repairs to make sure the safety features are in place, and file inspection reports of the repairs with the park owner. State law also allows the park owner to make inspections and require that mobile home owners do repairs in order to comply with park rules regarding maintenance. State law presumes that the park owner is City of Mounds View Staff Report May 2, 1997 • Page 2 motivated to make sure the mobile homes are maintained. As we understand it, this has not been the case in Towns Edge Terrace. Mr. Long said that the City can enforce its Housing Code in the mobile home parks independent of when sales occur. Staff would note that, although this option has been available, we would require additional staff and/or a change in priorities to undertake a systematic program of enforcement in the mobile home parks. We would suggest, that before such a program is undertaken, we develop resources to help finance repairs for mobile home owners, because we do not believe the owners of the more deteriorated mobile homes will have the financial wherewithal to repair them. We would also want to know Wit would even be possible for us to do repairs and then certify the costs to the County for collection with taxes, since mobile home owners do not own their lots. Our concern is that if we press forward on requiring repairs, the homes will just be abandoned. We need to develop a game plan for obtaining compliance, not just for doing inspections. With regard to instituting a point of sale program, Staff has surveyed nine cities in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area as to types of programs being used. The results of the survey are shown in the attached table. These cities use three basic approaches: Truth-in-housing: Two of the cities are using this approach: Hopkins and Maplewood. This type le of program requires an inspection be done, and information be supplied to the buyer on existing code violations, prior to the sale taking place. The inspection is done by a private inspector. This approach emphasizes disclosure only. We have received feedback from the cities using this approach that they do not believe it is worth the effort because there are no teeth in the program. Several cities which have truth-in-housing programs are considering adopting point-of-sale type programs. Truth in housing and repair of immediate hazards: This program is similar to the one described above, but immediate hazards must be corrected prior to the sale. This approach is used by Bloomington and St. Paul, and is an improvement over the straight truth-in-housing programs. It emphasis disclosure and some code compliance. Point-of-Sale: This type of program is being used in Crystal, New Hope, Richfield, St. Louis Park and South St. Paul. It requires that an inspection be done, and that the code violations be repaired prior to the sale taking place. Three of the cities use city inspectors;two of the cities are set up so the initial inspection is done by a private inspector, and the reinspection by a city inspector. This approach emphasizes code compliance. The attached chart shows the fees charged and the staffing used in each of the cities. It should be noted that the staffing requirement is highest for point-of-sale using city inspectors and lowest for truth-in-housing programs. Just for information, there were 98 homes sold in Mounds View in • 1996, and 26 mobile homes sold in Colonial Village. City of Mounds View Staff Report May 2, 1997 Page 3 The questions before City Council are: • Do you want further research done by the City Attorney into the feasibility of having an independent inspection program at the time mobile homes are sold? • Do you want staff to develop a proposal for systematic inspection and housing code enforcement in the mobile home parks, independent of when sales occur? • Do you want to institute a city-wide use a truth-in-housing or point-of-sale approach? • If City Council wants to institute a point-of-sale approach, do you want inspections done by City inspectors or by private inspectors? Do you want re-inspections done by City inspectors or by private inspectors? • If City inspectors are used, do you want the fees set so the program is self-supporting? Staff expects that if Mounds View were to institute a point-of-sale program with City inspection, or with City re-inspection, we would have to add inspection staff and secretarial staff to Community Development. If the City were to institute either a point-of sale program with private inspection or reinspection, or a truth-in-housing program with private inspection, we would have to add part-time secretarial staff to Community Development, or"borrow" support staff from another department to do this program. Our existing inspection and secretarial staff in Community Development does not have capacity to absorb this program. A truth-in-housing with repair of immediate hazards, or a point of sale program, would move the • City closer to achieving its goals for preserving, maintaining and upgrading its housing stock, with greater results expected from the point-of-sale approach. Action Requested: Provide direction to staff as to whether City Council wants an ordinance drafted, what issues you want it to address, and what approach you want to use. N:\DATA\USERS\PAMS\SHAREVSPECPRO.PSP022.97\PTOFSALE.CC 1 To: Mr. Chuck Whiting City Administrator ,. From: Don Hereau Townsedge Terrace Mobile Home Park Date: April 11, 1997 Re: Pending City Ordinance 1005 In the past, it was common in Townsedge Terrace for mobile homes that were substandard to be sold to unsuspecting buyers. These homes were purchased from other parks who had removed the homes because they were in disrepair and were considered undesirable for those parks. The home would then be placed in Townsedge Terrace. The owner would do minor repairs to make the home look better and often hide the unrepaired problems. The home would then be sold for an inflated price to unsuspecting and desperate buyers. The owner would become the lien holder by providing a mortgage agreement or contract for deed. This type of financing was done because the buyer was unable to qualify for any other loan and because the owner did not have to pass any inspections. When the buyer would find out about the hidden problems and ask the previous owner to fix them, the buyer would be promised help in making repairs. Unfortunately the help in making repairs never came and the buyer would be forced to make the repairs, live in substandard housing or abandon the home because it was unlivable. In the last case, the home would revert back to the original owner and the cycle would start again. I would like to suggest that the pending City Ordinance 1005 include the following items in reference to Point of Sale: All manufactured housing must pass City inspection before being sold. This would include Health Department inspection as well as inspection of structural stability. The manufactured housing must also meet any existing city, county or state regulations regarding sales of manufactured housing. This would apply to all homes whether being sold by a private party or by a real estate agent. The cost of inspection of manufactured housing will be paid by the seller. Any repairs made after initial inspection must be made by licensed and bonded contractors. The manufactured housing must be re-inspected after repairs are complete to insure that it has been brought up to code. Owners of manufactured housing parks must notify the City if they are aware of any sale of manufactured housing. This would apply to all manufactured housing even if it is being moved to a different location outside the City. • I would be happy to discuss any of these points with you at any time. Please call me at 786-2182. Thank you. I .. i ‘• a-(-- -__ ___ -.3c- t,LN -1 A-,X,i-VC_V\C -S-e-cc C . Kohl,z- -- Au Nr\A.C.A\ c. Q .\ riNcL:\c) (__. . . ..c.K_ .y.c.s,_, __ _ _ .___ _ _ __ -3t) k-A \r.yK:AL.p_v-\... \f__(-‘.. •6 , \41,\-- \/-- -v-• :` V3 . -- - •-k-L- Arml--_ 4- C1• -).r., V-)L) . 7._ -_.3 L\ 'Tr OW( ,-M\34-6- 1,-) - \\.z_ aL4 s)0 i W;k-L- k r\V-tl-ez• A iL-E CC i\.C.,5•At ?:_z • . -)-(- -7\- .-k• S \`\ r(N-k.- . C- :Q-A5 Q , .V..)e.._. \noiA.p\L: --Ac\n-k 5 V\Q IN._... ) I \ - \DLi— t c -7-,) .S4-,-,v7R__ 8...c,0- , _ • N V ' F V A 0. • ' •• ` 0 • V y V V V ♦V . VC C Q N o e HG y LC . .. 06. ° V. R ° eR RyD ^uco - 3 C > � H y 0 E 'p tt.. R? a . 0 E E • iR Cr. C O e.. V . OuCpR7ORcnN0 We e0V L ` • a• C `•a ° 0 N vc N COR .0U R C V n'c 30RC O LR a�"'•5u _'�_. 07 O.0< • C gipR0 cc r. 2 0 3J co 0.1 0. CW • .0 U .7.,. i2"` GO.R OO 4 .0Ou. EuC C6: o . R C C..+.. 0 u.- Vil: iUUilI0 ...9 : Nuy X.� Y N ea. 8E.- 7 N mu- V ` .e C . T C V u ` oN u N G •.0C C CO L V OtR > Utr. oLVuR72 u0u 30 151 p ...... .0 . u u •. CO ... - ccG'flR t....., u.9. 0._. >. C N.0 O YO RR CuC17 u O O' V u 0 L v 0 uQNut� Er O, u V cL uUCvq T T- � ....... Cu ,. L. L. 000 07 C NLL. E. .. ` 0.0 u 7 V.- O.a 0 74 7 .y ti EV Y .N. OE'.0. 03 N ua u ° 3i° .. a " G•3 . d °.a .0 0 0 v c.4 C M T E ^ =Ea o tCe > O au• AEO 0,= r- -. •n Euu< C a co oN G u a Gy ` OV C„ o - Eccn d OVE 'a ,- oT ( Eoa o ' - 'O0u .0te 6. V > .oa•L t- > 0 u 00 COO.E 'N- 03 -- 0 , • R3 .0 O LG •OC , 2 3 . 0 ^ O E . . 9- NRNE : .Uv-0 • > uN " CAt- E u > R .0 e R Nap 0 C 0uTE. .a -. • 03 R0. „..= 00 • LOOaO A'00 • 4.1 • • C 0Z udZ d °R RO._ dA R dY N L c- aD V 7 CeR V O V L 9 Gr a .0 R C•- u-•,., C oC hQO N 7 R 7. .0 7_; 0 . R.o L = - c eu o .- 0. 3 V cR CR t- R - E L C- 0za .0 r o G 0 „ 3 c-J V R a p 0 42 a 0 Cu,- O VV - CD ^ 552 0 Ve • Vi ' -O' ?••••• OL • 2 C NL .. c E< CO CC R R 0� 6. > o U .0w > 4 d ° u R•OtOt. O` L.` 3 .. •X K ` CV • NEc - 6) 0 ^ Nc y -. ` °' ^ E u.6CO oE t- m ` 4.2 02 0. . mu 7u UeRC - C TL . V c ° yaa 0 _ 0., ` > >-. -, v > • › °'� 7tFaL T 00 CRCT oY � ou' � N __ fv _ ao0V _ VO U� •S0co � GOU •._ CO y Tt C L T U 0CO 0CC R.- u , .0 2O u UCO- 0 T • RRGya u RVRTtiTVU Vu3 L L.0 u U ^ cm O- . NyR Evo� COR 9 '� aOteca ?? cuu -eu.5 ou uc • cc 7C` � : 3 - u E0 3� cc` uOaatc02Q.052- - 0_ =Roo• °� _�sc0 = uuo • " .1o _ u = x o 'C ° " ° ` o CN > o0ac. c u Ir.... •- 0n uv - p 0 O .L 0Ve0 - 7.UT•-•oo _ 'RO •y L VU.5 E 0 B. 0. 0.0 Vv] V . 71 u •. V T> 7 U 3 bN O•fl fe C y R • 9 - - 3•C V L Es G O.cc- U E•O C ON R y ° RG,R C - C ` •O _ 7. 7 2 V CcN O 0 w 'p "'"-• O V v G > u UL >,aC Ta V O 7 R N O+-L RC "=" O• N :: Q N V R N U ^ y. 0m• i;.0 - 3 - C Y T1„„ Od `. .2._ RRRe.m U R t„,_ _ � 7,3 . .0N -D .G L'Ru ° �° - e ° R a y •N a a0 . U U N „ V] O u •y` - C Q L 2..'...9. Ga . N N ".0> > •54 VO R G uu .j y a- O N ULuuV a 7u ^` .. R- OVU uE oa) co UC- u . OiR'f .5•^ V y 7 om-_ >.0 JO c N d y E R E m ` c H E E Eno C 30 cn C >,> Gv .=•,-; Qy3u � 7OE R• •CV E LA = '� � O E w'O N C2' ..4:,- O ° RR OC O a TCumV - VU UVV• OR'yOus L L G F•O5 .e3 L`C '' ae L O. N. - OG L L� .L 0 O V N RVti 04270C - - OV] V .C^Ja0 h L . ..r'+ V) N.S N3 ai a� V v) V.O [- c F. 2,, -0 co 0 E- E-2 py E^ Q C'o Q ? 1.N ..1. .ra` 5 N CO v.- 00 0 ° OLO U O R T eo. A 0. 'O L E coym E. . L E- c a E co a- v N 3. L u c c U • _ __ 7474-. • ammummummaimmir -. ,ti NJL y hi y i i..- : G'- -eV O V^ Y E Cm u N : 0' wH p vGi .. i3. C a i. V 17, ' O T u. .. .. .�.. ` R uG .0 i •= °>i 7 0,` N p 0.0 �. ,„ O N NG 7 eo• ` ` C V L. u 0 0• u T >.0 R T O Gid C v C,p u 0 co 1-i i :`R 6 - T 2 - u C-0 E G 'C'N Um ., cOu e .,e- pCR _x GR U R u N3VU 00 3 O wN C 40 iC - Cy'fl V aN VoC O 9 - • H R O •E C. 0 7 a _ RYG` Y 6. V R Y GUN N O. RuuR GOf6a V 7R 0 H3O0e..0 uOaa Ra 2- •V 0 aR R •t! .. C C L eR u = GL :R G R O N 'O O u e0 . Y U ..0 u Va -• G •..7, VcUtO ..iL C °..•O.L. c C•.0 G u u L. uayL.... au 7YT .0ROt.. LN OR 7 a - n3 1 pcL 0 „ 7R NU7 6, t- ^ Gv 0- -- ucE. .. .0 R Ru ?•- G ai h. C • aC0 , U 0 C > .. V Re 00 V05' 0 ONC • u N= 0 O co u � V V •C L u O v 0V u co••- > iuO uN •. J. N .0 u°Car C yE 0 2 o •> ' 1-,', a C - N b y•C CO _'.y y u • 0 u V o - C aN UL _ U 7 - 6 � ahC7` '� rCOC O U 0 u t- o 5 Ti ° c' o9OL ° •_dC _ 0.id eo'.- C dO R .0Vp G RS N ' aN > 0 V CUEof•1G` y 0 0 CC 1:1 T y m G..9 V e • T c C: z_IO.R V • - O Z > > y R � .` R.- R`.- u 3 O e . u V O `uO U > V 0 pu o0 OC lA7 V6� > ` � va• . e � y � 6 E � .. vR ' Tu0Cs c. CG.°L. c • uO N = 46CO` ao ' .0 ` u°'o - • - E V - C cC LY 1 uG 2' Y OoNc .° �• oces amL ‘,:3 - e O•- uc > 3 , °N VG �VR O - a-o 7 u b e > Uu p co c Ta °' u 42•Gd 0R7Ly .< C C O C . 1...._ d, ` NH o a•U'. t"uVoao5oCOR .. ° ° u _.uG !Laou 0 R CG 0E !1. y1Ro0OEC ..... co U•C G. ..._ Reu 0ty L'C U C , C ^ CR7'DURdU V Va, c CO x . C0 O . TR ° U +C V uRV R 6a > u C 5 N J ' uO. GR: U. V 7 T>`TT L T G .' ai7 'C _ MS -a y G O _ 'O2 N _uL O. Vt0 u "C... u- ? u o c Q o X_00a ER R T7 - QCQ 5� v d oa c 3 = c a• ` ao o y m:o E ..a • c • a 5 e .0 � 6. 5 RaLu. y ,C co u .- 9.` No uc ` •Q R u > 1 R aR V n N CRV u �'i 5'..- , .2a `° - u'VC'> °J c = N ,0•g Q� • 744.•..D - • ,_ 0C " . 3 _ 0 if u V }a. T A a a a) R e"1 N 2 V d . " f/1 0 C U ....0 �` O U0C .-.D13-,-AU ' - ci a 'co� 0 7 cZ 0 OUltd 6OY o u y C v C R Rii 7 U > 0 0tO0O000 - OOH00 .0yoV u i Gi, 42LR RV wt..) ,1 „„'•uV ,, Qo R•. U 0 Q °I •- M E O - _ oN r • •- > T `0 . 0doGV CO7LaOp 'LVOu Rt" Cu > N 'N0w .E. ,g •U V u„N Nd .- CRV V 0 COc0) .- cr • • ..O C T uL LVLN Ci .07oU ... 6e3 oo-'s T� cyac =oo = • tY . . Z � Ea = -co . ° ° rcti .A00c_ � L $E , eu - .,cT>,.0 0 - o - uaY 7•0 . a v. ` U ' • Ir. ,-ilUiUhiti9HH1 c 3 y 3 R �. 0 ° o a u a -. _ RRo a R N C -so N cc V u uG .. 0•y o 0 c.c-2 c.c VV3,.,, RRoRORO ° 02 o - `.•V -6.` V •O0 2 '7 Nt^ p Ry RNU ° .OLU - O L G RL V 2 co a yC aE T . 0 a•U C a p > a N n a S R _. u N d Y, 7iR u 0 NN R a R cOu .0 v Y .0N V 7 u,a- ' 7 - NV0o VVm a'E RVOO Ru ' oUOve - . ..R . = 0 N • . .. EccY 1V Cu N.0 T U 5 V u _ 7 R VI r.•• V V a0- ` r y 44 V ` > L. u 0.C. .-u° Uw - a•0 Vn C6c1 N U .0 .. .0 . RE_ 0 0 w M a 3 0en •-. CO C- COs a 0 • u'0 n 3 � C u . T N- O.�y•N u L-L GV C N 6. .U R u.G'C u R▪L T Vti y N- - T T t_ C V L - .7 VC O V C Ly ., L0 yRCRO C .- y c u b0a 0ro L.E 0 v w C 8 p ' N O N 0 `nC a .0 • R co pCuC, R - ix 0 - ytK_ 0v0 C •C RLLR U ^� L ` a 0. ` C CcS 6dCR 0 L 4CLaO -V.T Apo = y ^ '` a� ° u y 3 c 3 RL c ` o< 3 0 u u O 1 G u ti= u ` u ,,, Tai o y u - E • ' .„ 3 6 C1- .a u ` 0 Lc. EyE0aL u a u 0 u R ro C Y 0' c0Cc ` - oZy C 06•- '. 0 .) ai icce a) N-t 0._ >T V 7- >.i.' V 2fl06t C •pO 0C0- vRL C Nroc Lu C.0R 00 e0 a LLC u G E � TO G . O LC3C > Ui0RCNLR uL. 0. cCcYL•-: ' . 0- ' A C3C -- 0 7cU u3r" u7 Lc7 y2INvO 0. L Y CC .om- 0- Rye 01.a° •- E ° coV 3 '0 A L C =. ` 0 . ICIP. OCC LV 7 S y›" 3 CO � YRAYD ° 0'-0 N o ° 0 9: Ey'0 u : " a Q a) U ca••- ZN N L8 _ = em- 0 .o ' • •0•L a C O L T 0 L O N V R _ . = u '-. a .0 V OUu GLay uNCLLy > 4m L a 0. v 0 -L .0 ...9 C_ Hey `._ 3 eLo L..` 8m u-oo e- e0.E a 2 oo•Ru000E 'oao . -G.0 V 0 c - o7 COVneo. LR0o >,L0oo 4.)7) Uiil Fc • •co al e'p Ral 7aiv O ; uOLV L u > u x a)• 7u a V .. L Cuodo = L > LEt_ • - > •5 '0 u '° °Lu CN.1CC - R_ C O L ? C > N Evou CLG-oo _ 03u •O 7 d - ' u > 3 C - = Occs - d L ud LC ROd fu. rs' L Ny )y _ • YO 74 0 VLe c• G, oo L C C `Ti L % V ` AOaON ? uLV R O iNU > up u wO ° 0 7 7 -• CY u - u L c.C a U Y 7 p -- - y• 69 ^ C - C = OC U^ 7O 0'C CL 6 ,_ .o =` Y L -• u D7 p 3 O ,.O y RN -• LUp` - Q 0 at i•-•u'C 0 0.).0 ecru C co.= p ` . !gm CU Ou C • O aj uV ro U V a yN CZ1.. 7 u - u LPN Q) aR3 ya>'- - _ ry.V .000;8 N0yaCEyJuR Q) N + roG V OD • G .o c y - 3 C al X- CO LuT V C Jr. _ RO aVa'C a c. O E T.� R ro 0 R 3O C N . L N p N L - ,... u O .0u , m u R t.0 Tu VC 0-0 RUVuV U c.y ° C . V _ G en L u co x 7 c e y y u C E-. > 7 c u _L - C •E -Y -070 Y vY R u ua u O L u 7 u 0 . Y yu _E- H • G L._ ^= 3- 3 G C Y N Ly C R R -aCr R a'C T u R aC.. >.'.. 6' O o ` cs ` v o . ` `•c= 0 °' m G 3 a� = - a aoe. u c ro . =6 c o -° . TOCR� . .- c- >.- T•0 L C - . >.VL = • >` d` O.^ u .= a u O . m> R a . 3d R .R u O._ 7 . .. �. C p- CR C -. mOyr ..0 ` .cCLL y u - ` a- �^ ° L R u` u0 �^ CYL 00U C Y 77 M � °Ou C.= 7 0 4. C CO yR u > 0 ZO•_ 6 0 0' E u y y 'y40 -. u >.-L ,M: C N L e u :- C '_ .RL u . Yuo a 0 3 C y L ` UL Le0 R - i C u a L e 7 -0 N L 0 Oy • 0Lc > 0 L _ CCR R . ` UaL.° CyR3CCO0. UCOaR ,L a) _L a N:. TR. ..' >,co OcO U u u C.L ._ iR E .- V > O L V .N L E u 0c 0 u Lao6- CCEE7.aOCcL 'u ° RC.L ^ ` > uy ` Gd VauOc N` ? • '0 _ R O-p C 7 euO•C O 7O L 7 6-.- N L G L V U L CO O u O u - CO• aT y wu.� L amyEC O_ . ON C io L 0L 0Uox _ 3O'C . c C.0CR'C L RE 0u UL0 a U 0 Rp ro EN e cn ca; o al co .eu u ,cR U R O u y V R R u to L C TL u 0 T•� 0 c C ° c .O Ru = Le 0 e uaua - L > > R `°' E- E ) o0 �L0r5.- 7aNv�-0L .= .0 3 >, 4) [ a) . M0oa) yow o 4Qo V 0 ° y a)ii. c ci RuL .c c u c cL r 0 7 Eer 00 E 3 0 � o ^ C >. a EE .•_ p O 75 c. 00 .Y VuCL. aL - OO 0 u T. .0 y T U T • L 3 16 •0 O ` V _ N y .0 u > N C•- ` DuC 0 0 -6 y R O 7 0 E u co 7- R 0° o a d p LN yC•. N `L ca0'C � o m 3 E 3 ro Q N T O J R E a c - C v. R - N y7eLro c.LO O7 RuO.CyuOL0Q 7 H $ -• a .... vvUa `OT. G. O L.0 H U C LY'-0epLuYO ' mO-. ti v0 d0 O aco p C R A ` 0 ' HLV-d 0 6. . E y . 0 a � aT-. . au._ L a>LE io- c o c 9 = 8 c. - o L . � a O L ' '0 0) 00 G ` aV i;, aC t 4,4 c 0 c 0 LUe V 0 8.0 7 _ °°c V E L° ° ' 3 p L E - L 7:7 - 3 • = cU V y C > C at 0 V 7 h UUU u "••••• Uo' .'GV CO - 4.4 U o V O7 CO 0. 3mCR •0 0 V > 4U0LC = y dy^G u y p rn 0 La0 vv7 .. E a C 03 0 • a` C ' y.c •0 U u 6) R _ a .y R u.LG 'GLCO_ ti7 CpE L ' u . • uR7 7 N 00 CO _C G y ' 0. u ...0 = R . >.. C.D y (. L7 .0 'O V C a)C ` C R U = R C.- - 55 R V 'CO • = UCumU UCOE cO . C . COL CanN NCOUN -- E 3 mc . C' Giy . .0 uy a' L O L O y R >, aaaL.n u 6 u E7 > RE V 1. y R 2 L rn O.0U `CRV - 07 r3 C �>.O > ° Cv1 y -. a or L.0 .. u L 7 7 A oR u7 U 7 UN C' oo . V aCO 0a La0 aCROLu •D >. a= N O. .. u > > y r E o >. L L C 'U o 2 5 eou R „ o ..0 > c > c - CO , L ` . CO �n _ A .co . y: cC 0.a , R > °. ^ w >.a •:.-Lu N ' 3` A,V E • QU ,_.G 0 . •. m.O . ` O U up CO y R-LR Y 2 E" O •7OdLT U 3 3" : Q U uT. > : [. Tv : 00 yG V C 0 eL L ' °•° R p R •0 ° "yu 0 L - Cz 'O OUro13 ' •C L C O e0 _ • C R z ro y.°.aLz r Na z >•u � Z O : z = 'o ° y ° °' R u o oEc LAN. . Z y . U .0.C u UUO u CC C R - � yvnO > 7 ,., O= a) R O .EE nC) 0.) . u aY Q) R L • L- C c. d R ) L ay • .y- o v.O c . R:- L17•._N a E . . . s .7.,._... . .a 3Q L °� ` >u H EE E m e y r=ae c� ? o Eo Et oyE;; e .. c o cNo_ G" ', • � re >• uRuc 'r ° = y LLCOUN . "- o=0 - 7 'oC _ 7 • •_• V > RuuCC. • e ' Et0 u � V o C • ac_ a C y O T, U U u N u 7Os uL .0 ro 7 C. N - co O N 7 .. L u O.} p C . 0 7COO% U7a' °' G u ' .>. c u ..0 o ,.. L• c .p • al ...L. uG s CI a 'Op >' a }. � yc _ t.. 0 u _ u . y >. .O V 7 CyrJ c E GyC E uO 0 a= 7 R 7 .Y 0 - y c _ O . VT•'- i 0 • C 0 - u .0 C.0 O -C CO ` 00 73 'C CO LL _ N L y ..; O 44, V61u. OU C '= L'y - OV0_ " tiU L r u DS -- O c a ..c.• ^ ual C aOO 0` ,. az 07QyQ Hc ' G y07.N vE -,-7; 7 y• `n n.V U N ° _ ° E � 0 •C2 a .01L R a VR U . c2oCTV= y 7 V y 7 R - e0- . aro u L C C R^ C = eG •E - C C.R uC ?{ L. .' u 0C 6 a •- CCO Vrj N OOU pE 'O 5'(nom u RE ` vR Ld CO7 da L- Cs.. CO) '- u= L ca c 7 E. A E Oy0) oRCEu oC - U v 7 uR p 7 O L U Va 00A CERO 6GL uNRE. '3 U 0 m yu >,cEuNL' v ma = - ° E ° coEo ro _ 0 ECU . . � = ` GE EU 7 aGu• uLE 1 °'- uo 0 cu ac u E0a = E- y Eel u .3 .CV -^ aL 0.0 a 21 6•n n L ^ ^ Ct ° N r- 0 ro ` C c = 00) 0 H7O R O(-..• pUT O of y C ^ R 74 L G V C n Un R. u7 U La, Eu 0. E VO` ` �' V 7C ) _ T - =. R cR L - L 77 a • R p, N Vo R. y Cy.c 03 1e m- UV y E" ^D u 1^-cuc E^ C - o FRL u - u'EEd'oE I...It ..... uy C 7.L4)F = E aa L•C V. C u u LLL C FVG C R , •rV uL G 7 u 5 E roc-'7 E, ) u CU co fq .= 3.51 .c _- 0 RN L u O t e • • -.. ... V .. 3 ' CC '•••••• - Cai TE c cuYC 6i06 `>-'.uy-C v OU T- u . ' .' N Cc>.O- VCy V .' O.NC3 R C cv 06) VER.c VuL R C` 0RRR= 7 uuce'- i E . � Vu V 7, La. O . E RE E -L GN O0.- ccR .0 ° U• E-o ea4. RGyN0'C. N LyE > N . 0 N . TL > u .,,c 0.- Lsu3 ccu peo > �4,,..,© to > ueuV> CVR2NLI0=2:1 aO> � u tdoL_ L•- es 0. La0o O ' '� 0 3VCce + ' C c - .L 3. N c:,....flU u 3 OR T 07 O ' C '.. 'C � eO C •Eu 30.. 0 O G w NyCOD YaE - r.:,L. R u t.RO O u .-. T c > 0- E L N G eO Z •E . CO3R Oy 'CE.Cu A�L • p.0y - C•- : U EucC co ROC E >' uY0 R6 : , VVRC .. Vr.RRVC 'C LN C y u'9 '•' R 3 -oEc.. u''C7c > C > . ... . 0uG 7 ` 7 7 N 0.. L V 0 U VN • N - CyCu ' .0•EA Gs =• -8 V u.0 ° u▪ > .Nt - u °5Eg = R0 "5NyV. ti'u6) O T c 30 V ! GC .= Vj O .. SR V-= V R .0NV _-- A - E R R3 N- U - Vc > N - C vVV" V °HNoO0C- ^o uR L 0 - uhy .- - ,r0GO7 -- ,0L C U O-J 0U•- E V L R V V'- - c N'C c C L o .` L CY0 ^L YOCC V O y rnu cOV R L T C ._ u._ CE ` G R C G cO y R cos C- V O R- 0. <LO O K N L . t:. Cu ^ R N` V ` R T >..C.. C._ •3 O 0• ,J 6. u 3 yu u ;C U -.^ G u 2 21, ct. 00 (" yV .0 V C G c- t uc yN u^ O >.Si o i. Rce'C uc 0) GC Y t-. O O C > u 2: N R G- .. 6 T c > u - Ce-` u 0 C c 2 C G=O cyvL00.0O C O . d0 -• .' N 'CR • C C Y .= EE• 0C.0TC,C'0 O a'C a)• ^ C o OU - mu a)C Rya• . V Vr3y ` R Q N uydua VccV R ...7.: a 7� C CGE ` EcyU VO 7 u• 0.= Tr-70- C .T C C . uw ° C) ° O' ' '0 - ucR CCOGyccYRo _ ` • • y 0N .cOO . `t� Cu y C u u= °NDpv moo Oc ' -- o - - • 6. 0 • Lc) R".> s u -. t- u M I. L O. . ,..< 0 ° Y� 4, ..• E 0- 4- . c - c r'i O -. CO ^o 0 O = '` ee V. 0 6_,•0 T. ... C6. .- C4aCNOVoUVLaiV 0 R • • - v▪ u- lev --. O ` 0uv -^ OT yC co6. Vt... 'CC._ UC T - Oc V•-CE. GV•'' RuL` 6- u.8 CO. u.0•- t> T> 3 - Y 'C ` C 8 O 2:10ev'jR •-z5. N C7 E C 31 O i c - 0 - R E o vs ae • 3T GR O • VN `r. 0N .- N � .0yoR-m _. - NER ` o_ V c OC 6. 03 ,n-.a. .0.0 OO. -- T•0 ea C A 0'• OVO U CC•t •C C.E u O Y y Eu_ co y- 0 E•C y A G UL- R • -. _> y EZ iO8.0. „ ¢ R O - oo.` V. R` 0 6. U.... R-E N u E O 3 •- '7 -' > - - „ O 0y L OU ^ R - C._ • > = .- - .47,,- 0 4 ,urccG- UL V ' r _ O • D •_ 7 R CRG` EU C V R Rev coOU.''_ CV 0 C ^ LO - L aOU c c > ` �.L ` G ^.. ROt ^ R 5' o u ▪ y I. NT y u > -. O ? E"' C OR _ CG•E EgU N 6) N u ._ _ CO E. y LC 00 - W0 CU V' - OU` 0 u t- T E C...-- (-- TL u - L. U C uR 3 R R " = V") .^❑"0 N K > u ,VN O R 7.0. ° C O vN •D'C O0 yti3 CG Zu u Q oO E3 cT. c c0u ' ) o '' to = = Ry C? V co ` _ u E . c .. - 0 cc= 0cda z • E c. � Qr..... ,21. 0-17.,- - 06 a ., o > • -_0-0 y0 -.-, .- 0-°, 0 - 0- c _ o R � 00 C „°1-u - = 3 0c V `,C- - RO O N R C C 3C C _ Gu yR ^ v-i Lm O U.N.LU.N U7 S O > O 7 W _V _U ii c. C N 4 R G N h C u > oC % U= •G0 r, a. >" vR )-° - K ,a ; 0.u ,. y ° 7v. G^ Fu Q Z . acc-- aLEa - ° . •C 00 - ,.5 = , C'J� 'HvC2 u y .0-'- •C - r1, .- .7 C E 5: 7, : N C 7 • • 9 0 C. O 6. c R O GR _ u Nu cW rU 0. RV• uu 0VuV CuELO ^•0 V ORO' cR e. VL C C 6� . u O ` CO N Q C . at Z en G'0 > ra yC 0 . E s ` � C 7 = - yG .4NV .: V 3;C R 7 � Y " i VV30.0. . - u 3tn. V6) t R R ‘•‘••• C 6. . _� a L • O•V E `' 0 '. ^ n pp ' › `•L G ,E.1 uV m V R O ''L .. C N uu e"tyN , n•.- . .1.- • T. e.,.- .OO u.O0._ E - 2 C -0 300 vh C RC -=- >‘- • -•- sY p - OU •0 O 00 u uR Cm 45 y i- E G OC E = e0 L ° LE OLL ; 'co t 7 .. R•C y a L tr O N N 3 3•Cu E C 3 ,, La � - .D > -7... - --0- ^, NCCmOR G--.. 410 eo - ue d h= ron � c u G u . •' A 7 - � u.� E �--0 0 0" w Uw 5"n h o ° rd [ �'E ti - E'dcNy --0- Ta� _ c2c � u o m� N = o 4.. - c u osc c ?- C `, o c0Ems.•- -ua ` 3a•° R� c0." oou� vu- CO ivo0o4. N- RR ae o me IR M 3 =. eYo � HN ow.- E 'LI' ._ o H . VI ( a 3 3Y T L y _ cL LVL'- O' � 0 - bLy y •u 3 3 m ET • Z,,,°' Cp 0 4 - � C 079.0 O C u C C u � D 7 �� - 3p C E gen OL.0 C CudR . .c u = y ° UO co .' OQ L Oc ` ^ G.. n R- . REO 0UG R R 7 E E ' oC cuTO L _ -'- CCO'a " ` mC 'C3 u=_.° C so iun V E . 6) i0 ._ N .- CG . . O . O O ^C 6. _• , C Vo.VU O n OCL'TL u > 3u ruUu7 �tO r� c C y a.OO A 76, CV) t • col • SO .. 1° .." R� E � y - G� d TURO • R > R VNGV N L - R CVN 0. NE O 4 Q 15 R 00 O. 7 00` . NV 0 ' 0_c L O -'0 IIUY R ` C .0.0 N R L O uO - 7t - cRC u � U i , u - -_...'C N .^ RVe .0 s . E. as G•DUO.2 Z O. C c EV �.0 u RL L u - o° TF o b . 6. ¢ u uN E.0 = 7 - eLco G. 3 0L bu0 '= Cu0 o CV CN 7 NCC •- . ^ `y R b F. s- 7 N e U °aE72 ` e_ C C >'C• i .. •CO ` v � L•A R - p VEuCA R �O41 V O wypCCvNTua^ eLR :':',',1 • .0uG 6. V uVOV.` d eV - .J '- 'C GN= ou . LE E " e0 ° "^ oC0C °' N6u ¢ 0 O E (.17 ,-, C V6i Wm t- C e 0 0 y V idGO07 C CL yC = .- ROe,C R COL - u u' > O V 0 07 3U - O.0 uT.E MC '''. G6) . OV'CO6) T . O _U E T . - _Cc u C- Cn O.O Yu O 3 L 'C c E OC ryLYRu > y L 0Cy U - O C•T 7 •;. 3 L•= n y0 3o y t3 : .yC G 30 U L 0 0 u 2 E E.0p u LRNyN N Cu - O. • RE ° -, ,Tic R0E ( s' C.G s3 Q E v R 7 u O.E O R V d Y ,".0 • E0ou` c L • 3VV_ 'C V r 'b .� O ^._ N U O to C C 06 c. C.0 04 R v C7oU ? ... 7C- O L y �' C L .� > J �OU L . L0L 6. 6� - V` 0 C . U 'NR O Cu R V4 - R .. io -. C'C G ` --le Q 7 R C7 C'C u`."7'u � y- G' y ..ta G _ ? _ COyR .E .. R N ._. . LI OCCu O L RyC•C 0c N L•- uE C.O R 0 7 y OU. oyy3 co O V C O• C E. --i 30 e- �,_ e-.-1 N.N y a 300 L .0 w 7.o C e.t = co C 43. O O -L CN 7•p °-'7Z . •7 7 - TF' R -L EcvN OUC u6' O O0c y 0•: C3LGE (/ � NT 'C L O O q] 'C O R O y u ca •y N . V u -0 0 - c.a= I) CV O W R Ru R ` 0 > 7 � _. .4 •"-• , 3R ° • - > ,-.1Cn C E E,0'0 C u NL a.. tRECC--, u ,.. � O y T TV L .. u V 0• u - 0 L. ec .? o ° ` Ru � K = ' � C ? ° °= oA 0 co 4 Sr - 0' . E0 asuo ' V VuE- •� Rue )) = o O. OC aEQ Tc `'� R V- r 0 L ,, y jCET.0 y C co 7 C R S C „Sr 7N •y_0 .E c 'V N u p, C= E L O °,NNV "1 U y 1^1 W '4 .- c4, VCA R N H - " L'O R ▪`- R -0 y . O 7 E u U C R•-t- 7 a(� aN3u r I. T Vu VG °. N N L OuuVoftt�= N 0Z CCVL`O GN C = _ 0 >;. G 0 u 03 vR - 0h' � O L N 5 O C Eo _-^ 0 vRY > _ .: R = C O 8 L- 'C u to'C E E'7 VO 60 LR N0 - - R .0 . E 6+1 " co0 T.�.- ••N T L E. COL V .- N c <,.--. .'- c > uOc•CC-. N ° Ta.= uC' CN . G O Ocl'ru03 0,1 .0L4) ALo m Z y R... L E c0 G :P.., = R C L K t- >Y'C u3 o L Q V ._ . u 6) y 0 G .L1e• TG•p mT3Otu Eu t- c LR usR0O L - R �6N C u o R ° L � T'� O R � >-o 0. N T. a 'C •.so rso 4, .°°O ¢ "o CO L4 °R R R c d.0 v E E 6") - E r. 7,.ic E ,� u C.; 0-8aN'i E au . 17so VG G C7 O. T O E..'` yO iV 7 C R C u V V R c N 3 u cU . 4110 0. ? V R u C.-. a Nu ),..t V C >N UE .2 .45 RC E-c. ERTR Et- CLUQ �. yNC.�. cO > e- RR .7O 8 S0.Nt...: 7 7 N ` 7 G-= oR.E C0-c 7 O ° 5 .. 0-c 0V > O.`.07 0 N N0, R 7. 7 VN c. Vy `,`g V.. Q4. VV Nto yV17L. 0 = 6) .R0R VN.0 . 0 °° 0u - V.0 - a T u V O G .0 O R •L.0 7 .- O V c tV 'O vi 00 L u3 LH .- ` V .. GO �3 RO.•`.1V 7QAO. MW `y GN F. u GtE , z V' =V V 7 V V u . 9 ` a.- ' . � 7 Rv ; -7 a '=�o '< 0A 5 u -6H�`o �6? Re -o ,,) Z00V. urn07 .. . Lt... 77. o" � 'V C.) Li) = • � • 2o , � � 0.3 ue �� ; o7 ^ o = ° � 3u ,. a , oa � cu : p ¢ > u.. R � �uo : ,, conRvc .. ci ., RV. , 434 -, O 6) .. =- n u,_ C C . ° 7L.'- vv0. uCR C�;VI L• uG OLRcc3Ru0 ^'1 CUI. 0RRR U thN 2 L nN..3° F,-.7:. 8n N.- R C H > VE R a`. 77 LL o Cn � R E.T O co O t..s'.. 44 • Item No. - Staff Report No. 91-6079 Meeting Date: May 5, 1997 • Type of Business: Work Session WK• Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Discussion of Revisions to Housing Code Date of Report: May 2, 1997 Summary: The City of Mounds View has had a Housing Code in effect for several years. Our work with the Housing Code has led to several questions where we need City Council direction. These questions are related to whether all multiple family residential units, or only renter occupied multiple family residential units are to be registered and inspected. We also need to know how to handle duplexes or fourplexes which are joined together and occupied as a single"owner"unit. Discussion: The Housing Code defines"multiple dwelling" as a building or portion thereof containing two (2) or more dwelling units (Section 1005.03.) According to this definition, duplexes, condominiums, • townhouses, and apartments would be included. Section 1005.12 Subd. 1 states"no person shall allow to be occupied or let to another for occupancy units in a multiple dwelling for which a certificate of registration has not been provided by the Building Inspection Department." A registration fee is required. Section 1005.14 Subd. 2 states"The enforcement officer shall make eery effort to inspect the premises of all multiple dwelling buildings on an annual basis to insure compliance with this Chapter." Based on these code provisions, we would register and inspect all duplexes, condominiums, townhouses, and apartments, whether they were owner-occupied or renter-occupied. The City's practice, however, has been to only register and inspect renter-occupied units. For example, we require owners of duplexes to register both units (pay two fees), but in buildings where the owner lives on one side and a renter lives on the other side, we only inspect the renter-occupied side. Duplex owners have protested having to register both units. Silver Lake Woods is another example. We do not register or inspect these units, because they are owner-occupied, even though they fit the definition of multiple dwelling. Finally, we have had some unusual situations arise. We have had one individual purchase a duplex, leave the two units intact including the two kitchens, cut a door between the two units and use it as a single, owner-occupied, dwelling unit. We also have an extended family which has purchased a fourplex, is using the four units as separate living units, but the entire building is occupied by the owners. Our fee schedule requires payment of$5.00 per unit, with a minimum of$30.00 per building. Therefore a a duplex or fourplex pays, in effect, a flat fee of$30.00. City of Mounds View Staff Report May 2, 1997 • Page 2 We would like to confirm with City Council what you want us to be doing and would make the following suggestions: • Multiple dwelling units such as Silver Lake Woods Townhomes, where each unit was built for sale, and has a separate deed and a separate PIN number, would not be registered or inspected. • Duplexes where each side has its own lot and its own PIN number, and they were offered for sale, would not be registered or inspected. (Example: Larry Beach twin homes) • Duplexes on a single lot where one or both units are renter-occupied would have to be registered and any renter-occupied unit inspected. The minimum fee of$30.00 would be paid. • Duplex units where the two units are left intact, but used as one residence by an owner, would have to register, but pay no fees and would not be inspected. • Fourplexes would have to be registered, pay fees based on four units, and be inspected regardless of how they are occupied, unless they have been legally subdivided, the units have been assigned separate PIN numbers, and all four units are owner-occupied. Where a fourplex includes an owner-occupied unit, the owner-occupied unit would be registered but not inspected. The minimum fee of$30.00 would be paid. • Create a definition for a cooperative, where a group of people own a multiple dwelling but units are not owned individually. Cooperatives would have to register, pay fees and be • inspected. Action Requested: Provide direction on whether an code amendment should be prepared to clarify these situations and whether you want staff's suggestions incorporated into the amendment. N:\DATAIUSERSIPAMSVSHAREVSPECPROJVSP023.97MNGCODE.CC 1 • Item No. 5 • Staff Report No. - Q �s Meeting Date: 5/5/97 Type of Business: WK WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; City of Mounds View Staff Re CA: Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business port To: Mayor and City Council • From: Lynnette Morgar01/1 Item Title/Subject: Discussion Regarding Liquor License Ordinance Date of Report: May 2, 1997 As discussed at the April 21 meeting, Ordinance No. 601 was introduced regarding the public hearing notice requirements for intoxicating liquor license renewals. The proposed Ordinance has been revised to address the recently adopted ordinance regarding temporary liquor licenses. The proposed public hearing modification would follow the same procedures as for renewals. Renewals of existing license issued under Chapter 502 and the issuance if temporary intoxicating special event and banquet licenses as defined in Section 502.03 subdivisions 6 and 7 of this Chapter may be granted by the Council after a public hearing without the requirement of a prior published notice. The public hearing and second reading is scheduled for May 12, 1997. • ORDINANCE NO. 97-601 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES, AMENDING TITLE 500, CHAPTER 502, SECTION 502.08 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 502.08 of the Mounds View Municipal Code is amended to read: License Hearing: No issuance of a new license or transfer ei of an existing license for the sale of intoxicating liquor on sale, off-sale, club, sales or on-sale wines shall be hereafter granted by the Council until a public hearing has been conducted by the Council after published notice in the official newspaper at least ten(10) days in advance of the hearing. Renewals of existin a licenses issued under this Chaster and the issuance oftem tor. intoxicatin. ssecial event and bans uet licenses as defined in Section 502.03 ubdivision 6 and 7 of this Chapter ma be !ranted b the Council after a • lic hearing without the requirement of a prior published notice. Section 2. This ordinance is effective thirty days after its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 28th day of April , 1997. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1997. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk-Administrator Approved as to form: City Attorney i S Item No. (D Staff Report No. 'M-2 ON GOS Meeting Date: 5/5/97 • Type of Business:WK WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Lynnette Morgan 1 Item Title/Subject: Personnel Com ittee Date of Report: May 1, 1997 Over the past 2 years,Mounds View staff have experienced several organizational changes. These events have greatly impacted the City as a whole which has put a strain on employee communication, responsibilities, moral and productivity among and between all parties. Last November an employee survey was conducted to gather information pertaining to a variety of employee issues. The survey results indicated a need for further exploration regarding organizational change. As a result, Chuck, Cathy and I have met with consultants regarding the above situation. Out of the three consultants, it was determined that James Arnott of Twin City Leadership would best meet the needs of the City both financially as well as conceptually. His consulting services would involve the following: a reviewing of documents related to employee • attitudes, interviewing key players about recent changes in management personnel, conducting several focus groups, and facilitating a series of employee sessions focused on training themes to help participants better deal with changes in the organization climate. The project objective is to 1) build an open communication climate, 2) develop strategies for employees to adjust to organizational change, and 3) foster a sense of professionalism in the workplace. The procedure consists of five phases at a cost of$4,700. Having a consultant assist in evaluating the situation would provide an outside perception on the issues as well providing solutions which be overlooked internally. Staff is recommending Twin City Leadership to provide personnel services. $6000 is budgeted in Office the Administrator for consulting services. • • Thursday, March, 13, 1997 05:28:28 AM QWERTY Services Page 2 of 4 Leadership of the Twin Cities 400 Groveland Avenue,Suite 613 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55403 tel: (612)623-9511 Proposal City of Mounds View Communication Climate Project Description James Arnott, principal and senior consultant, Leadership of the Twin Cities, a Minneapolis consulting group, would conduct a project to improve the communication climate at the City of Mounds View. His consulting services would involve: review of documents related to employee attitudes, interviewing key players about recent changes in management personnel, crar..;.L..i1.4 several focus groups, and facilitating a series of employee sessions focused on training themes to help participants better deal with changes in the organizational climate. Project Objectives SThe consultant would approach thero'ect with P J these objectives in mind: 0 Build an open communication climate. ® Develop strategies for employees to adjust to organizational change. ® Foster a sense of professionalism in the workplace. Procedures Phase One Review current employee surveys, organization chart and work flow, city mission and strategic plan. Phase Two Customize a needs assessment questionnaire oriented to the communication climate of the City of Mounds View. Phase Three Conduct in-depth interviews of key players, such as city manager, department heads, mayor or council members, or any personnel designated by the city manager to be critical to the outcome of the project. The collective expectations of these persons often crystallizes. Phase Four Continue the interview process to involve three focus goups, approximately seven persons per group, drawn from personnel facindifficulty with adjusting i to administrative changes. Thursday, March, 13, 1997 05:28:28 ,�,i -, . OWERTY Services Page 3 of 4 City of Mounds View Communication Climate Project • page 2 Phase Five Design and deliver a series of three-hour, facilitator-directed employee training sessions to potentially cover: 0 Leadership Characteristics employees fmd most desirable in appointed and elected leaders. Focus also on how one performs effectively as a thinking follower and professional. $ Change Management Change is a transitional process in which one identifies his or her role as an architect of their own change or as a victim.of another's change. The thrust of learning would entail determining one's acceptance of change as well as a means to design strategies to better deal with the change process. Conununication Styles Complete the Personal Profile(DISC)to assess one's style as a communicator, performer in the workplace, and openness to delegation and supervision. 0 Conflict Resolution Learn strategies to better manage conflicts, assess one's conflict approach, discover that conflict can be positive or negative, and recognize that conflict is a dangerous opportunity. • TeambuiIding An introduction to working on structured tasks as a team, balancing different personalities in the work group and looking beyond job descriptions to cross training and work functions. . Report Following Phase Four, a report would be prepared and reviewed with the city manager and his team. The future direction of the project would be determined at this meeting. The rationale for a theme in each employee session is to address predictable needs of employees struggling with changes in the workplace ranging from a diplomatic state of noncompliance to open rejection and resentment. Open, unscripted "gripe" sessions usually intensify acceptance of change and a better animosity without nurturing where the organization is in terms sense mmunicationfcclimate, and(2 deSthe future. The igna plan to develop(1) ascertain cohesive work force through training and supervision. Pana Costs The consulting rate is $100 per hour. Phases 1 and 2, 2.5 hours Phase 3, approximately 4 1-hour interviews $ 250 Phase 4, 3 1.S-hour sessions 400 Develop report based on assessing interviews and focus group results, 7 hours 700 Deliver and discuss report at meeting, 2 hours 2700 00 200 Phase 5, 5 3-hour training sessions 0, ro $500, plus$200 for Personal Pfile Subtotal $2000 • 2700 Toal Separate training sessions could be conducted by separate agreement beyond initial phases one 700 through four. • • • Thursday, March, 13. 1997 05:28:28 AM QWERTY Services Page 4 of 4 City of Mounds View Communication Climate Project page 3 • Insurance Leadership of the Twin Cities has consultant's liability insurance at$1 million, carried by State Farm Insurance. References • Provided by request. - Consultant James Arnott Consultant and Presenter - James Arnott is an organizational development and training specialist with a major interest in organizational communication. He has conducted more than a thousand seminars and courses for more than one hundred private and public sector organizations in business, industry, government and education. Jim's career has involved assignments as a government training administrator, a • consultant with professional training companies, an organizational development specialist for a major hospital, and instructional and managerial roles with the Minnesota State University System and Blake Schools. Arnott is a senior consultant and principal of the Twin Cities consulting group Leadership of the Twin Cities, and adjunct professor of Management Communications at Metropolitan State University in Minneapolis with the Graduate Program in Management and Administration. His academic background includes doctoral study in organizational development, an M.4. degree in organizational communication and undergraduate degrees in speech and education. Much of Jim's training is in communication, cultural awareness, supervision and change management. He is trained in the National Writing Assessment Project, is a major contributor to a state listening and speaking curriculum, and has co-authored three books. • i Needs Assessment Survey Results City of Mounds View • December, 1996 1. Do you feel there are issues or problems within the City that need to be addressed? 20 Agree 5 Neither Agree nor Disagree 0 Disagree 2. If so, do you think the issues will themselves correct over time? 1 Agree 4 Neither Agree nor Disagree 18 Disagree 3. In your opinion, do you have the necessary skills to produce quality work? 23 Agree 1 Neither Agree nor Disagree 0 Disagree 4. Are you currently being provided with the necessary tools to perform the required duties of your work? 18 Agree • 3 Neither Agree nor Disagree 2 Disagree 5. Do you have the necessary attitudes to meet the challenges of your required duties? 21 Agree 0 Neither Agree nor Disagree 3 Disagree Below is a list of potential concerns or issues that may apply to you. Please check only those you feel have an impact on your work or you can apply an opinion. Work overload 11 Agree 8 Neither Agree nor Disagree 3 Disagree Lack of communication w/Department Head Staff 11 Agree 6 Neither Agree nor Disagree 6 Disagree SLack of communication w/general staff 9 Agree 8 Neither Agree nor Disagree 6 Disagree • Needs Assessment Survey Page 2 IIIINegative Employee Relations 7 Agree 10 Neither Agree nor Disagree 5 Disagree Unsatisfactory policies or poorly communicated policies 13 Agree 5 Neither Agree nor Disagree 4 Disagree Insecurity with current and future status of your position • 2 Agree 7 Neither Agree nor Disagree 13 Disagree Lack of opportunity to be heard-regarding work concerns 5 Agree 6 Neither Agree nor Disagree 11 Disagree Concerns communicated but not appropriately addressed or resolved 10 Agree 6 Neither Agree nor Disagree 5 Disagree Lack of appreciation for work 12 Agree 4 Neither Agree nor Disagree 7 Disagree Inability to understand how your job and the work you perform fits into the goals of the entire City 2 Agree 7 Neither Agree nor Disagree 13 Disagree Frustration over unexpected changes in the workplace 8 Agree 6 Neither Agree nor Disagree 7 Disagree • Needs Assessment Survey Page 3 110 6. Do you think the issuesou Y have agreed with are City wide problems ®r individual individual department problems? _lQ.City wide _Individual department • • < < 0 Ci0 v), O 00 -o ai U 6Q. C 0 0 0 0 0 0 4E4 o o o r: a0i0. -:::::::: -.-- -,-...-..i.:-,::::: a E' ag E" o 0. E-, Ei ami x ., F' 0 x _ t , x : :: o .--' ;, 2 .-- 0 'o ..r 0 a) a) < W 0 W o E5 W ca -0 0 0 ca o .04 GY In I : = :` > ,-- N .-, M .-. r, N r••+ ,--- N Z ,--i on CIO O b11 O ::C:::c1:.' 0 0 0 y z 00 N z z z ›'l ; a) G o .- — G=r 0 Q, �+ v� En • O = 0 •O �, �,..� r., + N * • a) 0 a) ai a) 0 E 0 `° .� 0 o 0 , ., 0 0 a) 0 �, w w L.0 0 0 0 w - G='` woncA �3 on a w on - a0i °? a t=' o on 0 Ww Ea' � w wwri, UQ �n - aw 0 o kr) iir ....... .. O O M N v1 O O O kn 000 0000 O� N O O __ ,__, N N. ,— (-9) N 01 00 =. 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 64 69 64 64 69 69 69 69 64 69 69 1 -owi, A � > > :-.':.::::0i-::.:::-;'::' Z Z Z > C%1 E 7 73 E 5 tJ1 C/1 a� '71- ts� —4— a 0 a, �. ::C4>> CiD 4:, o i., i.+ .4 0 U .0 ¢, OO C L > > 0 co U a U �, o U U O c> 0c >4c� 0 VI CA ;1 ; : D :45 CA ►+ x O CC � Cl .Vr J.i. CC. O v1 VI iZt Item No. It Staff Report No. Q 7 aoS2 ws Meeting Date: May 5, 1997 • Type of Business: Work Session WIC: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; • CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Discussion of Revisions to Fee Schedule Date of Report: May 2, 1997 Summary: The City of Mounds View Fee Schedule includes numerous items handled by the Community Development Department. These fees have not been adjusted for many, many years. We are suggesting that the fees be reviewed and revised to bring them up-to-date, and to better cover the actual costs of performing services. Discussion: There are several issues which need to be addressed with respect to fees charged for items handled by the Community Development Department. We have outlined some suggestions below, but do not consider these suggestions to be in final form. If City Council directs that we • prepare a revised fee schedule, we would conduct additional research and bring forward a specific proposal. • Building Permits: The City is using the fee schedule from the 1985 Building Code. A revised fee schedule was included in the 1997 Building Code, and we are proposing that the City adopt the newer schedule. Attachment 1 includes the charts from the two fee schedules for purposes of comparison. Attachment 2 shows how the cost of typical construction jobs would change with the new fee schedule. Our concern is that the fee schedule is 12 years old, and is out of step with costs for providing services. There are certain items in the fee schedule for which we charge flat fees. These include: stucco, reshingling, residing, and fire extinguishing equipment. We are suggesting that a valuation table be used instead, with one rate for single family and duplex residential construction and a second rate for multiple family residential, commercial and industrial. Heating and ventilation work (residential)work go from $25.00 + $5.00 per 100,000 BTU per hour to $30.00+ $5.00 per 100,000 BTU per hour. The remaining flat fees should be adjusted as follows to better reflect the cost of inspection time and secretarial support: Existing Proposed Fences: $20.00 $25.00 Garbage/recycling enclosure: $20.00 $25.00 • Wood burning stove $25.00 $30.00 Installation of Mobile Homes $35.00 $50.001110 City of Mounds View Staff Report May 2, 1997 . Page 2 the cost for excavating, gradingand fill permits should be • More work is needed to determine if adjusted. Development Review: We do not know how long ago these fees were set, but many of them are much lower than the City's costs for doing development reviews. The existing fee schedule is as follows: • Type of Application ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment $200 ❑ Rezoning $200/ac;min$200 max$1000 ❑ Major Subdivision $250+$250 deposit* ❑ Minor Subdivision $150 ❑ Planned Unit Development(PUD) $350 ❑ PUD Amendment $150 ❑ Conditional Use Permit R-1,R-2$75; all others$200 ❑ Variance R-1,R-2$75; all others$200 ❑ Code Appeal $75 ❑ Develop Review/Site Plan $100/ac;min$100 max$500 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit $50+deposit* ❑ Wetland Buffer Permit $10 . ❑ Floodplain Permit $200 Since January, staff in the Community Development Department have been tracking the number 4o of hours spent on various tasks including individual development cases. The following are examples: Case Fee Paid Hours Spent Dollars/Hour D.W. Jones PUD $350 66.75 $ 5.24 O'Neil Property PUD/ $550 121 $ 4.54 Comp Plan Amendment Linders CUP $200 10 $20.00 Colonial Village CUP $200 14.5 $13.79 Spots Quick Lube CUP $200 55.75 $ 3.58 Hoopingarner Lot Split $150 14.5 $10.34 Tammy Bellamy CUP $75 18.75 $ 4.00 Zep Devel Review/Variance $460 51.75 $ 8.88 None of these cases (other than Linders and Colonial Village) approaches the cost of paying for staff time. We know that it may be impractical to cover all costs, but staff feels that the current situation, especially for large cases such as the D.W. Jones and O'Neil Property, needs attention. We are unclear why PUDs have a flat fee, and rezonings have a sliding fee based on acreage. We • need direction from City Council whether you want to institute a system that bases fees more on time spent than on type of application. There was a practice in the past that developers paidII City of Mounds View Staff Report May 2, 1997 4. Page 3 deposits, which were then used to reimburse the City for time spent by the City Attorney and City • Engineer. We need to know if the City Council wants this practice revived. Digital Maps: We have been getting requests for map information in digital form. We expect that it will become more and more common for information to be transferred in this form. We would suggest that the City Council set a fee for providing digital information. Action Requested: Direct staff to prepare a revised fee schedule for City Council consideratio to cover the issues noted above. Indicate whether it is the City Council's desire for fees to be based more on time spent than type of application. Indicate whether you want applicants to be charged for consultant services used by the City in reviewing applications. N:\DATA\USERS\PAMS\.SHARE\SPECPROASP024.97\FEESCH.CC 1 40 • • • Item No. Staff Report No. q'7-aO33 )1,5 Meeting Date: May 5, 1997 • Type of Business: Work Session R7 Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Discussion of Revisions to R-5 District(Manufactured Home Parks) Date of Report: May 2, 1997 Summary: The Mounds View Zoning Code includes the R-5 District which allows development of mobile home and manufactured home parks. As far as staff knows, this district was put in place after the mobile home parks in Mounds View were built. As a result, there are certain difficulties with administering the standards in the ordinance. There are also Minnesota State standards for separation of structures in mobile home parks, which are not always practical given the size of spaces in our mobile home parks. The Minnesota State standards are enforced by Ramsey County. Ramsey County sent us a letter in December, 1996 stating that any new manufactured home installation, or any new attachment(such as a porch, deck, or carport) shall meet the separation distances. The County is developing criteria for granting variances. They have also been discussing whether to start an amortization program to bring existing mobile home parks up to standards. Staff is seeking direction from City Council whether we should revised the R-5 District to address problems between standards and field conditions, and/or should we pursue an amortization program to get compliance with current standards over a specified time period. There are also some provisions of the R-5 District which need to be clarified and improved. Discussion: State standards require: "No manufactured home shall be located closer than three feet to the side lot lines of a manufactured home park,if the abutting property is improved property,or closer than ten feet to a public street or alley. Each individual site shall abut or face on a driveway or clear unoccupied space of not less than 16 feet in width,which space shall have unobstructed access to a public highway or alley. There shall be an open space of at least ten feet between the sides of adjacent manufactured homes including their attachments and at least three feet between manufactured homes when parked end to end. The space between manufactured homes may be used for the parking of motor vehicles and other property,if the vehicle or other property is parked at least ten feet form the nearest adjacent manufactured home position." • • City of Mounds View Staff Report May 2, 1997 • Page 2 The Mounds View Zoning Code requires: -30 foot setback from abutting properties -30 foot setback from each street or roadway(we assume from public roads along the periphery of the park) -5 feet from side,20 feet from front and rear"lot lines"i.e.the boundary of the space for each mobile home -open space of at least 10 feet between the side of adjacent mobile or manufactured homes • -off-street parking spaces shall be no closer than 5 feet from"lot lines" -each space shall have one off-street parking space -each space shall have a 160 square foot concrete slab or surface patio -each"lot"or space for a mobile home shall have 4,950 square feet;minimum width of 45 feet, minimum depth of 110 feet -each"lot"shall front on an approved roadway -sheds shall be a minimum of five feet from property lines and six feet from other structures Our standards require less than State standards with respect to the setback for parking areas from side lot lines (5 feet versus 10 feet). The State specifies that attachments(stairs, decks) must be outside the 10 foot setback required between mobile homes whereas Mounds View only specifies, 10 feet without addressing attachments. The 10 foot area must be open or"green" space under State standards. We require larger rear setbacks than the State(20 feet versus 3 feet), larger • setbacks to abutting properties (30 feet versus 3 feet), and larger setbacks to public streets (30 feet versus 10). Colonial Village meets the perimeter setback requirements on three sides, but not the north side. Mounds View Mobile Home Park does not meet the perimeter setback requirements. Towns Edge Terrace does not meet these requirements on the north and south sides. Below is a list of items which staff feels need attention in the R-5 district. If City Council agrees that the R-5 District needs attention, we would proceed to develop an ordinance revision and take this ordinance amendment through Planning Commission and City Council. Section# Item 1110.03 Subd. 1 Under detached accessory building,list the specific standards for construction,i.e.: -maximum 216 square feet -maximum 15 feet to peak of roof -limited to one per lot -shall not be located in any easements unless permission granted Consider changing setback requirements to allow sheds to be placed next to mobile homes if fire protected and egress windows not obstructed. Current requirements are at least 6 foot separation from other buildings,5 foot from"lot lines". These requirements make it difficult to fit sheds onto lots. • 1110.03 Subd. 2 List accessory uses for mobile home parks,rather than refer to R-5 (which in turn refers to R-1) Limit these uses to airlocks,one accessory building no more than 216 square feet,decks,patios,room additions up to 200 square feet,bearing the State 4 City of Mounds View Staff Report May 2, 1997 • Page 3 Building Inspector's Seal of Code compliance,home occupations involving no customer traffic,recreational facilities if for park residents,other uses(see 1106.03 Subd.7) Take out RV storage except in storage yard,noncommercial greenhouses and conservatories,boarding. Allows garages and carports in mobile home parks,if built after the effective date of this ordinance and if in compliance with setback requirements. (Staff does not believe allowing garages or carports is practical given the sizes of lots in the existing mobile home parks.) 1110.04 Reduce list of conditional uses to improvement,enlargement,extension or alteration of existing mobile home park,private recreational buildings and facilities, governmental and public utility buildings and structures necessary for the health, safety and general welfare of the community,model homes,townhomes,PUDs,day care or group nursery. 1110.05 Subd. 2. Clarify section on setbacks so setbacks to perimeter of site are separate from setbacks from individual"lot lines"Change setbacks between mobile homes and for parking areas to follow State requirements. Change front setbacks for double wides to 20 feet,for single wides to 10 feet. Change side setbacks to match State requirement. Require a perimeter of landscaping around each unit. • 1110.06 Add section which requires that a copy of the"Safety Feature Disclosure Form"by filed with the City prior to any in-park sale of a mobile home;require a record of any inspections required by Minn. State Statutes 327C.07 be filed with the City Add section which requires plans be submitted and permits obtained for any installation of a mobile home;and that prior to installation of any manufactured home constructed prior to July 1, 1972,the mobile home must meet current life safety codes and be approved by the Building Official. The mobile home park which is in the best position to meet City and State standards is Colonial Village. The other two parks have some definite problems due to the size of the mobile home spaces, the lack of setbacks along the perimeter or the lack of off-street parking. Action Requested: Provide direction to staff whether City Council wants revisions to the R-5 district prepared and a proposal developed for an amortization program to bring existing parks to current standards over a specified period of time. An amortization program may require the mobile home parks to resize the spaces for the mobile homes so that City and State standards can be met, and off-street parking can be provided. They may have to reduce the total number of spaces and relocate gas meters to do so. N:\DATA\USERS\PAMS\SHAREVSPECPRO1 SP021.97\MOBILHOM.CC 1 I Item No. q Staff Report No. 91- .031-1 Meeting Date: May 5, 1997 • Type of Business: Work Session WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Proposal for Revising Wetland Zoning Regulations (Section 1010) Date of Report: May 1, 1997 Summary: Section 1010 of the Mounds View Municipal Code establishes Wetland Zoning Districts which include identified wetlands and a 100 foot buffer area surrounding each wetland. The regulations also require a permit be obtained for any development in a wetland zoning district. This permit is referred to as a wetland alteration permit. The authority for issuing permits is either administrative or by City Council, depending on the proposed activity. Discussion: Staff is proposing changes to Section 1010. The first set of changes has to do with the authority for issuing permits. The items which are now listed under administrative permits include: • 1. repair or maintenance of any lawful use existing on the effective date of the ordinance 2. alterations within the wetland buffer zone(which) do not extend into or impact the adjacent wetland 3. public or private utility work on existing facilities 4. installation and maintenance of fences 5. landscaping not including impervious surfaces 6. detached garages and accessory buildings 7. grading which does not adversely alter storm water storage capacity, storm water flow direction or runoff intensity 8. temporary structures not requiring permanent foundations or pads for support Staff is suggesting that building additions and impervious surfaces which are 864 square feet in size or less be added to this list. Since detached garages and accessory buildings may be reviewed administratively, we believe that it is appropriate for building additions of an equivalent size also be reviewed administratively. This would simplify the process for homeowners who want to add porches, decks, patios and room additions. We would also suggest that item number#7 be modified to allow administrative approval of grading that may change storm water flow direction or runoff intensity, if the City Engineer determines that the drainage design will manage the storm water so the quality, quantity and rate of inflow into the wetland after construction is substantially the same as before construction. Finally, item#2 needs to be clarified. It appears to say that any • work done in the buffer area is allowed with administrative approval. We do not believe that is what was meant, nor is that how we have been administering the regulations. Our understanding City of Mounds View Staff Report May 1, 1997 Page 2 is that work within the buffer area is divided between administrative and Council approvals. If#2 is intended to allow administrative approval of any work in the buffer which does not extend into the wetland, it would simply the process. There would no longer need to be a detailed list of items which receive administrative approval. We need City Council direction on the intent of the ordinance, i.e. whether administrative authority has been given for handling the permits for any work in the buffer area, or only for the items listed. The last proposed change is to use different term for permits. The term"wetland alteration permits" makes it sound, especially to citizens, like work is allowed in the wetland. Staff would suggest that we have two types of permits: "wetland buffer permits" and"wetland alteration permits", and that the regulations be amended accordingly. Action Requested: Direct staff to prepare an ordinance amendment based on the suggestions made in this report. N:\DATA\USERS\PAMS\SHARE\SPECPROI SP017.971SP017.CC1 • it" Item Item No. Staff Report No. 97-j0g5 Meeting Date: May 5, 1997 • Type of Business: WK WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and members of the City Council From: Bruce A. Kessel, Finance Director Item Title/Subject: Proposed budget calendar Date of Report: May 1, 1997 I. Budget requirements. The City's Charter and Code, as well as State Statutes set forth various requirements for considering and adopting the City's budget. The following is a summary of those requirements: City Charter: Section 7.06, Subdivision 1. "The budget shall be considered at the first regular monthly meeting of the Council in September and at subsequent meetings ... The Council shall adopt the budget by resolution ..." Subdivision 2. "At least two weeks before the budget is adopted for the ensuring fiscal year, a summary shall be given in the City Newsletter, in draft form ..." • Section 7.04. "The City Clerk-Administrator shall submit to the Council the budget estimates with a budget calendar to be established by resolution ..." Section 7.05. "... The City Council shall hold a public hearing on the long-term financial plan and adopt it by ordinance ..." State Statutes. On or before September 15, Cities need to establish a maximum levy and set the dates for a public hearing on the proposed budget and levy for the subsequent year. Budget hearings need to be held between November 29 And December 20. Cities can not select dates until such time as the County and School District have selected theirs to insure that the are not duplicate budget meetings on the same date. II. Proposed budget calendar. The 1997 budget has been reformatted and should be ready for distribution in the next several weeks. Attached is a copy of the Community Development budget as an example of the new format. Staff believes that the new format should improve the budget review process and reduce the amount of time that will need to be devoted to reviewing the budget. Also, staff believes that the budget and long term financial plan are very interrelated and should be reviewed and adopted using the same time table. This will insure that the information within both documents are consistent. City Administrator Whiting has indicated that his goal is for the City Council to provide a list of priorities to the staff to be used in preparing the 1998 budget. He will then use those goals to establish the parameters that he would like used in preparing the 1998 budget and • long term financial plan. The budgets and long term financial plan would then be consolidated by the Finance Department and reviewed by the Finance Director and City Administrator, and City of Mounds View Staff Report May 1, 1997 Page 2 • then by all the City's Department Heads, after which time a proposed budget and long term financial plan would be presented to the City Council. By September 15th, a preliminary budget and property tax levy will need to be approved. Additional staff and Council review can take place up to the date of the truth in taxation hearing in early December. The final budget and levy needs to be adopted by mid-December. The following is a proposed budget calendar. As we progress in the budget review process, additional dates can be added as needed. • Proposed budget calendar May 5 City Council provides general guidelines for 1998 budget. May 12 City Council adopts resolution establishing a budget calendar. No later than June 16 Departments submit proposed 1998 budget& LTFP to Finance. June 16 - July 11 Finance Dept and City Administrator review budgets &LTFP. July 14 - August 1 Dept heads review budgets &LTFP. August 4 - Sept 5 Council review of budget and LTFP: August 4th work session August 11th 4:30 to 6:30 p.m. August 18th special work session September 2 work session • September 8 Council adopts preliminary budget and maximum levy. Sept 8 - Oct 3 Additional meetings as needed. October 17 City distributes budget newsletter. October 27 Council holds informational meeting on the 1997 budget& LTFP. November 29 to Truth in taxation hearing and adoption of 1998 budget, tax levy December 20 and LTFP (dates dependent upon County & School District selected dates). • 1994 1995 1996 1997 Change from 1996 Reclassed Actual Budget Budget Dollar Percent •mmunity Development(100 -4180): Personnel services 010 001 Salaries,regular Administration 0 ERR 010 002 Salaries,regular Training 0 ERR 010 011 Salaries,regular Planning 31,572 31,967 34,595 50,291 15,696 45.37% 010 012 Salaries,regular Dev Rev 23,671 32,201 34,668 23,831 (10,837) -31.26% 010 013 Salaries,regular Code enfor 18,992 26,187 29,673 25,976 (3,697) -12.46% 010 014 Salaries,regular Inspect 39,371 75,601 77,717 95,194 17,477 22.49% 010 015 Salaries,regular Engineering 2,959 90 4,182 0 (4,182) -100.00% 011 Overtime,regular 0 132 0 0 0 ERR , 020 Salaries,part time 5,384 0 0 0 0 ERR 030 Pensions 14,512 19,719 21,933 24,995 3,062 13.96% 040 Group insurance 8,978 15,662 19,404 19,806 402 2.07% 050 Workers comp 1,796 1,443 2,131 2,337 206 9.67% Total personnel services 147,235 203,002 224,303 242,430 18,127 8.08% Materials&supplies 114 Misc office supplies 0 0 0 0 0 ERR 160 Supplies,operating 514 894 900 670 (230) -25.56% 210 Books&periodicals 110 329 450 630 180 40.00% 330 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 ERR_ 343 Printing 392 856 850 550 (300) -35.29% Total materials&supplies 1,016 2,079 2,200 1,850 (350) -15.91% Contractual services 303 011 Other professional Planning 981 3,460 2,500 2,850 350 14.00% • 303 014 Other professional Inspect 0 217 0 0 0 ERR 303 015 Other professional Engineering 979 3,015 2,500 0 (2,500) -100.00% 304 010 Consultants,special projects 10,239 10,239 ERR 304 012 Consultants,development review 981 3,235 2,500 4,170 1,670 66.80% 361 Memberships 454 558 375 805 430 114.67% 363 Training and conferences 2,709 2,508 2,850 4,150 1,300 45.61% 380 Mileage 8 25 150 150 0 0.00% Total contractual services 6,112 13,018 10,875 22,364 11,489 105.65% Capital outlays 703 Equipment 13,580 5,215 1,000 4,650 3,650 365.00% Total capital outlays 13,580 5,215 1,000 4,650 3,650 365.00% Total Community Development 167,943 223,314 238,378 271,294 32,916 13.81% i < ,1- M o0 vO d• t-- M00 = t- M -.1-- � •--, •--, M O N t"-: 03 0 0- e... 0- co` O o 0 0 o 0 i U in in Ln vn el- 0 i N Cl Cl Cl d GGt ,--i 1 .1 ..ter , i O � a 0 y OOko 1/4.0 covo, O co v0 �O �, = O, 01 01., 01 Oo =L M M M M M ON r� a G 11 M N VI N N ' GA N N ,-, O 01 C O d* O N O M O\ t" Md' V1 � ,--, d' 'c N C . O A* t� N V:3 t� d Vo N.i O\ N N N ,--4 O\ 00 O O N • bo 4-,• at U1 N M d' M O\ -1:3 Gd v1 ,-- a '' t` GT C-- ON ��,---, lam' O Ln v1 O O 0 D1 CC M to O O\ 0 00 O\ N w+ 0 VC = U • N- CC ..i 0 0 0 ir. E 00 0 O O O 0..00 00 00 00 00 O 0 0 0 0 O O c'"" = N N N N N O O U V �,'O 'LJ 73 C N O N �' >-, O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O $ U N N o - 01 N F. In cNC\ ookr; •p• L, N OOOO N ,� in N N ci O V) O - C E y r En 0 = 0 co 0 0 0 00 O O O © O • .-r O a•'a' W --, Q i G L L o c ° CC a U U 0• = GL..., a fl. a, c� c ; A c = � � 4 1 a, • c = to to � o ff F" '" E o ',7; :o C c:4 '= -cn o '= ° ¢ xaa City of Mounds View, 1997 Budget 05/01/97 07:44 AM und: 100 De'artment: 4180 General Fund,Communi Develo,ment Proposed ccount Description Budget Detail Description 160 Supplies,operating 670 270 Presentation supplies. 65 Development review-batteries,film,misc 130 Inspections-batteries,film,misc. 205 Code enforcement-batteries,film,misc. 670 210 Books&periodicals 630 60 Zoning news 145 Reference materials 85 Planning Commission Journal 340 Bldg code updates,manuals,pamphlets,etc. 630. 343 Printing 550 250 Forms,flyers,etc. 300 Bldg inspection tickets,tags,forms,etc. 5501 303-011 Other professional- 2,850 850 Environmental reviews �I Planning 2,000 Ordinance review, etc. 2,850 304-010 Consultants,spec projects 10,239 10,239 Comprehensive plan 10,239 304-012 Consultants,Development 4,170 850 Environmental reviews Review 1,660 Special engineering reviews 1,660 Civil engineering reviews 4,170 361 Memberships 805 290 APA-National&state 400 ICBO&Northstar chapter 115 NAHRO dues 805 380 Mileage 150 150 Misc.use of personal automobiles 150 363 Training&conferences 4,150 1,600 IAPA conferences-national&state 1,200 GIS/CAD training 1,350 Staff training&conferences 4.150 I 703 Capital,equipment 4,650 300!File system for plats 500'File system for as builts 750 Color printer 2,500(Computer 200 i2 drawer file cabinet 400'Vertical plan hold stand 4,650 411 .$ MAY 02 '97 09:10AM FLANNERY CONSTRUCTION'•) fit It P.1/5 • , �� +� � � • COMMERCIAL EDA e . : . • . irmil_,_ _ . . . . . . , . . . . : . . . • . • • • . . . . , . . • . . • „ . . . . . . . . • . . . . May 2. 1997 ' • . LETTER OF INTENT . . • City of.Moundsvi.ew . Post-it•Fax Note 7671 Date #o, . • • Administrative Offices • 2401 Highway 10 To C 4,J.- Z. `,'_ • - From • . 'Moundsvi ew-; MN • 55112 C°JDept Co. . Phone e Phone N Re: Bellrae Ballroom Project F # Fax* . • Gentlemen:. . • On behalf of Flannery"Construction. Inc. . we are 'pleased to, submit for.your " consideration our proposal to act as.your construction manager .on,.the above- • - referenced project. We intend that this letter serve as our proposal to enter into a construction management agreement with the City. We assume the . agreement would follow the standard form of agreement between owner-and • IP construction manager provided by the American Institute of Architects. (Form B801/CMa) . We have attached a copy of that form for your convenient reference.. . • We assume your acceptance of this letter authorizes the City's representatives • to enter into the negotiations with our firm to finalize a formal construction . . • management agreement. In that regard. we have outlined below the- services we would intend to -provide to the. City. Flannery proposes to undertake and • . complete construction management services during both the preconstruction .and, . construction phases of the work. - 1. Preconstruction Services. Flannery Construction agrees to provide.the following general services as part of its preconstruction services: a. .Construction cost budgeting. • • • . b. Preconstruction scheduling. - - ' c. • Value engineering. . ' d. . Bidding. phase administration, . 2. Construction Services... Flannery Construction agrees to provide the ' - • following general .services as part of its construction phase services: a. . Construction contract administration. . • . . . b.. Construction schedule coordination. c. Construction cost monitoring. . • d. Progress payment review and certification. . e. Contractor safety program review. • f. Contractor performance review. • 351 East Kellogg Boulevard •'St.Paul,Minnesota 55101 • 225-1105 • Fax 225-110.0 . • MAY 02 '97 09:11AM FLANNERY CONSTRUCTION . P.2/5 . . • Page 2 g. Construction change administration. '. . . • • h. Construction close-out administration. . . As compensation for .its services, Flannery Construction proposes that it be paid basic compensation .equal .to six percent. (6%) •of the• payments made to the . . various trade subcontractors, including any sums paid for changes in the work. ' The. construction manager would also receive compensation for additional . services consistent with the itemization of those services set forth in the• • : . attached AIA contract form, and would be paid- for reimbursable expenses • . . • • consistent.with those same provisions. ' We look forward to serving the City in this capacity, and we anticipate the • . compl'eti'on of a very successful project. . . Very truly yours, ' " . . ` FLANNERY CONSTRUCTION C. • : . • Jeilior- By: (7, � . ask Its: --� ` e....—/'_7 �`SL• • • ' ACCEPTANCE BY THE, CITY OF MOUNDSVIEW" . • . On behalf of the City of Moundsview, the undersigned accepts this Letter.' .of . Intent as the basis for, proceeding with the execution'of a formal construction • . management agreement. . Date: , CITY OF MOUNDSVIEW • ' - By: • • '• . . . Its: ' . • A? -2:MAY 02 '97 09:11AM FLANNERY CONSTRUCTION I0=3731770 P 3�5� 1ei23 • • • .,e . • ° A1A bocunienr 580110 la •;' f Agreement Between Standard FormL1 � Owner and :Construction Manager • where the Cans2ikuctfon Manager is NOT a Constructor h. • ; :.1992 EDITION •.t•;- 77115 DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUEVCI"S; CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT 70175 COMPLETION OR.NODIFIC;TION. ' This dexument is intended to be used In confurction trill; the 1992 edirlons of RIA Documents 8141/Cla.Al01JOIa and 4201/01a. AGREEMENT . made as of the second day or May in the year of (hrona.a,taaratraa.mmoe,hmrCyeatti nineteen ninety seven (5/2/97) BETWEEN the Owner: City of Moundsview . • maNfta mo 2401 Highway 10 • Moundsitiel,t,- MN 55112 III .. . . - • • .. and the Corsssc .on Manager.--z.. . rn,m gd add mi, • Flannery Construction, Inc. 351 E. Kellogg Blvd. . St. Pahl;. MN 55101 • ° • for the following Project: (tuch,de skraikd dace pd,..o/ •1oestitu..d rcet cs,eit Mope.j ..;•i . . Remodel of—the Bellrae Ballroom for The` Children "s"Home Society . The Architect is: . WAI/Continuum . ti, t .eard. at 381 E. Ke.ifogg -Blvd. . St. Paul , MN 55101 MI-J.1-4::e == : : h oel_cw. • The Owner s%.r.. \.vii...:`.:�i�-^+ � %L+:aj.. �� i$ 3Z Cil • `;•W, •.•.•••..;;S.• :. ,.........:L•..-.:-35:t..Thrg:A-crlt:GV' ..sarta:}'.t+n.:).C:.:tbotx.C.:'2.:.c^r[xtYsae,noi::.r^�ar_::=:a a, +r:._— _-av;ua%I :tt:n:rs.ry~::erz:at:r.:'7'.•.It .'r%%ai ::k.:;..%_.t:Ntli stibicct tr.c vt.tiat.r :rr::..:t::t• -MAY 02 '97 09:11AM FLANNERY CONSTRUCTION j Z' '`S"7 S • t•-, 4i5 /— 1. o ;nc Cc:natr.:c:un Co:..... a:.icard in.tr::c ,. • If cornpensador for the?reconstruction Phase is to be se^ar..te from.or on a urine:=nt than.the Coma—ewe=Ph .both • must be ceartl. dcsccibec.If compe ls:Mt n for the Pte-vastruc-_ior.?hose and the ConstnIcioa?hZse are to be covered by a sir_ zit.form of compensa ion.and thoc fors is tither based on a.Sdpuhcei Suns or s Pe:t;r:tge of Consat:c:ien Cast the following subparagraph should be completed and lase-Acid:' =a;• •• • ill "131.2 Payments for Basic revicshall be rra,de i=Pnovidrd is;ubcar:4mph 12.3.2 so that Basic Compil on for v.ch P'^rase shall equal the following payee.stages of the toal3isic;Compczation payable * Pre-Conssucion Phase .i ;tip:, pcceitY(.a, 6 %) ConstumionPlhzse :': • pe:cci-rr• .S 6 Sr * In the event the project doe's not proceed, the City of;;Moundsview Paragraph 13.3: agrees to pay Flannery. Construction $95 per• hour for time spent. Insert provisions for compensation for:rditiorn'Srices.Tor mpie,rt hour*rates aro used.the provision night rrsd: * 'Prindpals' tithe at the fixed rate of 3ninety five Mali= (s 95.00 ) per hour.rot the•purprses of this -a=t,the Prz'sc*-.3L;are.(tIst P-th aL) Supervisory tithe at the fixed r..ze of forty three Dollars ($ 43 .00 ) per hour. For the purpose of this , Agr-ecu.su a-�•isorf personae include:2e.cx supervisory p�•onthd by fob tide.suet=::✓'je'zz Areatet7.0 Techri 1 I.fe:l 'it.a at :he wed at, of • Co1L-s (S ) p •hour.For:Sha p•.u^•cses of this • Agement,e:5 e a Le'el:^.e.conrti ....ut.e:(Lec:x by id)drin,51.1C.:::= ^'Cr Desi. .Sol=err,tne.): Te.nisi Lr,•rl i t.�T.A.at t:e fte: rate. : • • . l;oilr s(1 ) x•hour.:For the purposes of this �.g•�^.ent,t,;'..nic: are II pe:.•, .,re:1. dude(Zooscibe by,i',4.:tea sic1 s junior Signe=,Senior Dreman,e.ti • T i ifci C.ave.=drse at the ted.:ate c•: Benin;(S ) e:`cur.'Sr. ;;.;:.ureses of this • A,resneit.re thutica.Level tII pesrmnei•.i pude: d7.--^/;cb tithe,such as junior Drafn.Se:•-=:.^r,cc.) • _ . Thee bath; .te si .l x adjusted annt.ily(semi-nr.: 16 et=treys::wit:-:the Co:str�c`cn:Lar, s d ��rccs la cern- . ceasazon for?r.nrc:tis and,-^pick."(.4dd agreed uccn fucrcr orfs) • If a mulepie of Dirx:Pe-sonnet=hoe sz is use...-',; Ser:";4sic pis',ene'oioyesd prcirsi ier. cnr_�-.ilrans'meat 1 multiple (. )•times ti:&L".2=•?eat S ne es ct_.r`in?'.r..,�-pi's 111.- . . . If a muldcie of direr._salad=;is used,the tern Dir__t Salary:fix sheuid he sz,:i;sriasced for sir;'?.-=•.onaeia . 'Direr Sai. / ., ..se eh 1 mess+_•Dire:s l..res dal'hea,z*iit=:'s o--annel=gag on the°:•cit t.hes=.!1;rig the ors:of cant:daunt=and.X::rl*_'r.d^se'.dient:o.wt.rthe-=ea.-.cry or c.Sr omar?. .Subparagrac.1.';L4•S: Et. .' suet the muicaL to be Ls= to de:orri_•ue the arscurc t.: .the'.."..c=v. on y4..mg= Construc:cn?r�ren-f:.=-:ploye.m or •1.- s mss-- consultant R•consultants =..='Setas c:._ ,:1:=.th.z'ar graph 12.2 or.%r_cc e.:1. . ,• . 15 SInset the ubparadata xc f,rnon baro ld yea the Ccrtkrsc cn •.get•s a7 b::rerr ensatr._' `for:crni�•es on Thu sat r 'cars as for lsdiJittonal Sa+res. • ' . mph 1::..3.2. • :. .... ;. Insar the pct.am ge titre and r.this'snc r ria.y,:,nauz1)ei irr .t o groes. Stat u t o r y •.• -, . ' :• :••tai•. . • 11.Art!c a 1S-•-Chet C.a at o=or$Friths •••_ • . . • • - Insert provisions,if any,on artd;rnrriii priest= n+ of seica.: l Serrtc�,s ersaperdl comtx:saeon=-..ge::hess,other consul- • mass,the choice of prat=deizvey rrc^.cc cr an othcc_r. cons. • ••• ' • • CN OFTrhE AG t ,...:•:-.... ._ • ' ' r^ P• csons executhlg therechest should i datn.he impeder et whit: they am ac n (tie-, preidene,.se .-y,Fart±:er.ac.) • in .the authority under which they are e-.W. :.g,tiie:,wr--.1,nc OThere a ropeate.a cry of the rzSoiudcst sut*soriz ng the indiv+dto1 to ac:on be^.alf of the rims ortS:f shouldix1aatrc:^ed. ..iuf• y AP -21 MA?- 0"2 in-i -As7,11, t7r K., ..1.aAM FLANNERY CONSTRUCTION . . P.5/5 • . : . . . . • . . • I : ! ARTICLE 14 1 0 I OTHER CONDMONS OR SERVICES • ..: timers desieriptimix of othei.rerriem identify Addarionat i kinetresia Within RAW Cumpelevaitili Wise MfitleglialtIONS tiv My paymou road ermirmisa(litu IE?ws Imelarial trr Mit rlorrarrni.) • L'.7:44-tili.P.,. , . 14.1 Unties on insurance r.., . - • '. • ::I :,,'.' 1, . i , • .. : 1 • The insursnee required by Article 11 shall be article1r for not less than the following limits. or gr4stei if-kuired by law: ! , :lasersare spacifie duals,estrum&pi.tba appropriate trasmartee Minim of at irtilize,,t . • •' ) " . . . . I.., • ' ; • • . • ' • . • • • . . '. . • , . . •"• . . - • • • .. • • . • * . . ." • • , •s.3 0: ,••• - • •S. • .f13; - •' • • . i . , .. • . .•. . . „....... . • .. • .. - This Agreement ered into as of the day Ind year.ffrsz written above_ . City of Moundsview Flannery Construction, Inc . OWNER CONSTRUCTION MANAGER .. i.. , . • - _......... .. (Siwicettgret ••,..- • '. • • r- • • - . • • . . 1 i 7z--- il!,A,•,,,. OF ' • normiekei Meow a .. uJa arta., (lrtmera;tame gaud • :•-•-ii. ..e.-- CAUTION: You should sigh an original ALA dov..:rnent wnic?: has this caution p.rinted In neti. 4111 ji 1'11 i An original asourzs VAay. ananges will not he cheat:y.1.d as rnzy occur'What% docaments ara rsnr,-"--de. :7277.'"'t Sta'e :r1Varr.Zrzt!=r1 .5;114-ir. !--': I. -Se. 1.:C2e:Sza tr R-z-.crottLiction ,-,..1 ;his :,..:••=-,":"...2f14:. • . .:'n!....-.2.,:•••..:. ....:. :; -c::; •-.•......:..-•.:-• , •-•: =:-:-.7: , •::.- . '21*••; , *".:::. ..-.I..7:::•.:* ".----:—. :7: .-.:::,77-:-.7 -z -77 . ..-:: !...7.-•-••••••,--:-•,-.:::..z.-:. _77 •.-r.-:..-:.•.•:::..-:-...-.-. •;_-.-..-..•.-: :.... .-:.•••-: .:-•_ .:-.:-_:.._.".. 5.*:•.:-.:2:-'.:-'''::i:-: • 1.71.1.2 WAI Continuum • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNPROJECT MANAGEMENT CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CONSTRUCTION SERVICES APRIL 21, 1997 MASTER PLANNING MEETING MINUTES INTERIOR DESIGN The following items were discussed by the City Council, City Administrator,Rick Kuehlwein, VB Diggs and Dave Wolterstorff,WAI Continuum Architects. • Demolition of the Bel Rae and replacement-estimated at 50,000 square feet. -Actual Square Footage: City Items: Existing Bel Rae 22,700 square feet Additions 11,100 square feet City Gym 11.500 square feet Subtotal 45,300 square feet VB Diggs 37,950 square feet Total 83,250 square feet -Comparison of 40,000 square feet of St. Anthony Community Center at a new construction cost of$3.7 million. 11110 -Temporary housing costs of Children's Home Society--WAI/Continuum attachment memorandum, April 21, 1997. -Other related costs such as demolition and increased square footage could total approximately$250,000.00 added to the current referendum. -Air quality/smells of existing building. Removal of absorptive materials and cleaning of the interior would make vast improvements but would not offer any guarantees. The possible additional solution without guarantee would be an add cost to seal the interior prior to finish materials being used. Estimated cost from Flannery Construction, $10,000.00 to $20,000.00. -One of the best opportunities for this was the addition of front parking for the public. • Wood Dance Floor -Open concept-key to the community. -Wood floor not"sacred"to the community. 381 East Kellogg Blvd. -Task force improvements did not necessitate a wood dance floor. St.PaulMinnesota 55101 Fax 612-223-5092 • -Safety issue with a small step down to the dance floor—solution-remove wood floor 612 227-064a (selLfreuse/replace are options), fill depression to create level floor-resurface. Wisconsin Office 2125 Altoona Avenue Eau Claire,Wisconsin 54701 MN and WI 1-800-845-0784 ITIMMEMMEMNIMEMINNEMMINEMMOMMEOMOMMON= r + • Overall quality • -City wants the project done right. -Architect explains the first direction of the city was to design a very cost effective project. The current pricing reflects this concept. -City wants to create a number of add alternates for the project, i.e., brick on the exterior etching on spancrete partition walls in the open area A)structural elements B)partitions later Estimated cost increases, $250,000.00 to $300,000.00. -No soil borings have been ordered prior to this date,therefore no soil correction dollars have been added to the project. -Separation is felt very important between the city and VB Diggs space. This was mainly for security reasons. • The Teen Center: -The original concept construction costs had the city direct that half of the teen center be allotted 0 to the city and half to VB Diggs—reason: the entry was to be shared by both parties. -Concern for control/safety brought a decision from the City that the entire teen center would be put underneath the City cost. Expense for the teen center/lobby is approximately $210,000.00 additional to the City costs. • General -VB Diggs is to match the exterior of the City materials. -WAI/Continuum to present schedule and new probable cost adjustments. • Fee Adjustments -Add alternates require 80%of architectural fees if not used--100%if accepted. Initial invoicing will reflect 100%and will be adjusted accordingly. -Separating Children's Home Society will require increased fee percentage due to the size of the project-repetitive work is required at different schedules -also shown in 12.1 of the B 141 Owner Architect contract. If there are any corrections to the above meeting minutes, please respond within ten working days of this memo or they will be considered correct. 410 E:\WORD\90634\MTGMIN.DOC WAI .044 Continuum April 28, 1997 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT • CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Mr. Chuck Whiting MASTER PLANNING City Administrator INTERIOR DESIGN 13 City of Mounds View Mounds View, Minnesota TRANSMITTAL RE: Bel-Rae Ballroom Community Center Project #90634 Dear Chuck: With the start of design documents for the proposed addition to the Bel Rae Ballroom, it is necessary that a soil boring/testing company be hired by you (the Owner) to preform the soil borings and testing as outlined in the enclosed documents. This information is critical for our structural engineers to preform their calculations for this project. The final soils report as prepared by the testing company should be completed and sent to us by the week of June 1, 1997. • In addition to any local companies that you may wish to use, the following companies preform soil boring and testing: American Engineering Testing 2102 University Av. W. St. Paul MN. 659-9001 Braun Intertec 245 Roselawn Av. E. St. Paul, MN. 487-3245 Maxim Technologies 662 Cromwell Av. St. Paul, MN. 645-3601 Should you require any additional information or assistance, please contact me. Respectfully submitted, WAI/Continuum ._.•--41°111P 381 East Kellogg Blvd. Dean A. Olsen, AIA St.Paul,Minnesota 55101 Fax 612-223-5092 iEnclosure 612-227-0644 Wisconsin Office E:IWPWIN60\90634\CORRESP\WHITING.LT6 2125 Altoona Avenue Eau Claire,Wisconsin 54701 MN and WI 1-800-845-0784 • WAI/Continuum CHECKLIST FOR SOIL REPORTS FOR BEL RAE COMMUNITY CENTER: The following information is required by WAI/Continuum to adequately design and complete the construction documents. It is requested that the Owner authorize the following survey information be prepared by their Engineering Testing Company. 1. A complete subsurface investigation and report with soil borings being taken at the locations selected by.the Architect. See attached drawing 2. Provide the following recommendations to be included in the report: a. Foundation design. b. Grading recommendations. • c. Waterproofing recommendations. d. Paving design recommendations for parking and drive lanes. e. Retaining wall recommendations. f. Recommended footing depth for frost protection. 3. The load to the exterior walls will be approximately 5.3 KIPS per foot and the load to the interior mezzanine bearing walls will be approximately 10.5 KIPS per foot. Boring locations; BM-1 thru BM-6 Building SB-1 thru SB-2 Parking/Driveway Document all above-listed items which the Owner has decided not to authorize, and copy the Owner. E:\W PW IN60\90634\CORR ESP\SOI LRPTN.0 H K s r . • ==----------------------------------------- i N . ----. , I . • _ . . 1 i .- .1- CA -- -- --.-..------:.------.:.! . . . . 1 -—i 1 1 i — 1 i -- ----:— 60 •— ! 1117 1 ' ! ! • • ! I , . •;,-! : 1 . • . ; i i ' . • 2 i E 9: 9 *B-r,-,1 • : 1 : ' i 1..\1 -.. ..:„. ,:-,.--.,„ , i r- ..._... _ : .............. i kg . _ • . , i . . . ... .... _. • • ..._ .. ..i i . i a • I . . .. . ! I , , ..0 :--- –77. 1: . • . _ : . 1 • - . I .... : ,• . F.' F.--il : . • 2 m . r !,--17,=: ,r, ........ _.....:..... _......._. • _. . - •: : i i : ___. , ,s : • _i :a i : : :*:.:1._ , . i: • ---: • _. r---- s um z! ,... ,ii Oz1 • _,,___—_ 0 ; I O. . —.... 1 1 . 0 cc -,..-:.t.• —-a t'• . : :1 I• II re._i l':i , '41 • r. :::x .: : z 1 iet• • , :2. :–1...___r •, .! - , , : . C9 L v i ,, i :'; ae, . I ; - ,•-. 1 I .k. - ,f5 li Li. .. ' 1 i . i';• . i Fl .Z ' • I. r v; I .... v 2.:..7 21-:-.• I "t ... i • ---rj-"'—'' = 3-71 ., • • , , - . ' g I ,'1. 1 R• .1 2 ' i .2 1 ; n CCI-- . i a.* . 8 1 i. : i - I \. " i ftii :4 ;71 .- ,,r. ) , w• I • e Lk ILS11 pli .--i-•r-r- 1 ___t..-i,;1.,:tj . : 1-&-d- - 7 - L-•_-__17, •t. - --- . .0 i4..$.. , •. - - : .-.......-....-........-...r.-......- .......--.....-•-....--..... -.-......-. -........--.-...--",-.-. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION s4,tir Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport F2 t 6040 - 28th Avenue South • Minneapolis, MN 55450-2799 o Phone (612) 726-8100 • Fax (612) 726-5296 MAC +g' o ytit G F 4/R PO Rte April 23, 1997 Mr. Chuck Whiting Administrator City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 Subject: Air Traffic Counts - Anoka County-Blaine Airport Dear Chuck, At the April 14 1997 Mounds View City Council meeting Council member Trude requested a copy of the Air Traffic Control Tower activity records to date. I believe she we relaying a request from a Mr. Markfeldt. Enclosed are the monthly air" traffic counts recorded by the FAA Air Traffic Control personnel . These records cover the period from start of operation, October 1 . 1996, through March 1997 . The traffic counts are recorded during hours of tower operation, presently 7AM until 10PM, everyday. The daily counts are identified categorized as Itinerant - goes or comes from outside the local control area, or Local - stays within the local area. The number of operations are recorded as AT - air taxi, GA - general aviation and MI - military. Most of the "Military" counts involve aircraft flying over the Airport. I trust this information is what Mr. Markfeldt requested. If not, have him call me directly (726-8129) . Sincerely, -7,e6eme, Mark J. Ryan Airport Planner The Metropolitan Airports Commission is an affirmative action employer. Reliever Airports: AIRLAKE •ANOKA COUNTY/BLAINE •CRYSTAL • FLYING CLOUD •LAKE ELMO •SAINT PAUL DOWNTOWN Users:All ATCTs . AIRPORT TRAFFIC RECORD • - Mail ORIGINAL of this form to Washington Office,AMS-420 thru Regional Air Traffic Division 44? Facility Name Location �Gc9 /9g ANOKA (ANE) COUNTY TOWER BLAINE, *1N. 4tilof3. 91 7 AI NI E IPS IN x(10-1) Facility Type("X"one) (1-2) (3-4) (5-9) Facility Mo. Yr. Location(dent. (11) Approach 0 B. Radar 0 E.VFR Tower Type If daily hours Hrs. 10ths Control 0 C. Limited Radar ® G.Contract Tower Changed of operation Towers 0 D.Non-Radar have change I. 1.__i (Continue on Reverse) (12)0 Yes enter new .. I (Also submit FAA Form 7230-26) hours. (77-78) (79) Airport Operations Count ITINERANT LOCAL Oayl Total Special Use AC AT GA Ml Total Civil Military Total (15- Operations (47-51) 16) (17-21) (22.26) (27-31) (32-36) Itinerant (37-41) (4246) Local 1 0 93 0 93 112 0 112 205 2 0 193 1 •194 242 2 244 438 3 2 74 2 76 80 0 80 156 4 5 58 2 65 12 0 12 77 5 1 1 46 h 1 5 i 996 4 7112 183 6 3 167 7 177 158 0 158 335 2 170 8 180 234 0 234 414 83 190 3 196 254 8 252 458 _ 9 0 117 0 117 132 0 ` 132 249 10 6 125 9 140 202 0 202 342 • 11 5 249 6 260 324 - 0 324 584 12 T 2 168 6 176 236 0 236 412 13 4 20 0 24 0 0 0 24 14 0 44 0 44 24 0 24 68 15 �- 0 190 0 190 290 0 290 480 16 — 2 129 4 135 116 0 116 251 17 - `-3 204 14 221 284 6 290 . 511 y 18 _ 2 194 8 204 310 0 310 514 19 6 204 4 214 300 0 300 514 20 1 1 R3 7 187 356 0 '356 541 21 0 129 0 129 168 1) 1.6.8 22 1 232 6 239 31.0 0 310 549 23 0 236 8 244 290 0 290 534 24 1 24 0 25 0 0 0 25 T51 2 150 12 164 192 8 200 3454. 26 0 258 6 264 340 0 340 604 i 5 88 8 101 70 0 70 171 - " 28 1 206 10 217 296 0 296 513 e9 225 0 225 378 0 378 603 <0 1 194 0 195 248 0 248 443 <1 4 287 8 299 356 0 356 655 otal I (,4 4944 140 15148 16540 128 16368 11/16 This Side For Use by VFR Towers Only III • (All Approach Control Terminals Must use FAA Form 7230-26 ALL VFR Towers recording01 3 1.._...9 L7 AJ_rt_1 E_..LM I N___ ADP Instrument Operations — (1-2) (3-4) (5-9) Control on this side • 10-4 MUST COMPLETE Mo. Yr. Location Ident. Instrument Operations _ Remarks Total )ay AC AT GA Military (10-E) (14-1) 1 16 16.19) L6 • 2 20 • 20-23) 20 3 II 15 ' 24-27) 17 4 12_ 28-31) 14 5 22 32-35)t 22 6 33 1 38-39) 35 7 18 1 40.43)1 19 - 3 44-42_1_1 7 9 rill - 8 _ . 48-51) 8hll ..0 1 27 52-55) 28 . 1 37 1 56.59) 38_ 2 23 60-63) 23 3 4 20 64.67) 24 4 27 68-71) 27 • _ 5 18 72-75) 18 5 1 8 76-79)1 9 (14-2) r r 10 16-19)1 10 3 20-23)j • i 1 1924-27)1 20 2 14 ." 28-31)=. - ' 16 - 2 23 32-35)1-• 25 12 x8.39►, 12 I 7 40-43►. - 7 . 8 44-47)i , 8 .. 0 . • 2 19 48-51)1 ±.1. . . 13 . .. _..52-55)[ .—1.3-- - -- 23 ..:. . 56-seri_ 23 - •. . • 6 25 60-63) 31 64.67); 30 ,* 1 29 .. • . 12 68-7111 12 1 2672-75)1 27 'al 30 579 6 ' ; 615 ' . )17-21) (22-26) (27-31) (32"36) . • Users:Ali ATCTs AIRPORT TRAFFIC RECORD RFI. 1PAtr ..p l., • M ail ORIGINAL of this form to Washington Office,AMS-420 thru Regional Air Traffic Division• 199 . Facility Name Location FiE 9 1 7 11 I ) v2 El MIN • ANOKA COUNTY ATCT BLAINE, 1`1N. h,-9l (10-1)Facility Type("X"one) (1-2) (3-4) (5-9) Facility Mo. Yr. Location(dent. (11) Approach 0 B.Radar 0 E.VFR Tower Type If daily hours Hrs. 10ths Control 0 C.Limited Radar 5K G.Contract Tower . Changed of operation Towers 0 D.Non-Radar have change 1, 0 Yes enter new ( • (Continue on Reverse) (12) hours. (77-78) (79) (Also submit FAA Form 7230 26) Airport Operations Count ITINERANT LOCAL Day Total Special Use AC AT GA MI Total Civil Military Total (15- Operations (47-51) 16) (17-21) (22-26) (27.31) (32-36) Itinerant (37-41) (42-46) Local 1 242 242 260 260 , 502 2 256 256 308 308 564 ,-- 3 3 5 148 2 155 216 6 . 222 377 4 1 135 9 145 148 8 156 - 301 5 2 122 2 126 118118 244 s-1 I 1 214 4 219 318 318 - 537 192 192 316 4 320 512 8 237 6 243 287 287 . 530 9 237 2 239 266 8 274 513 10 71 71 lien 1A 911 11 84 2 86 60 60 146 ) 12 2 169 4 175 300 300 475 , 13 2 105 2 109 150 4 • 154 263 14 7 185 192 134 4 138 330 15 199 2 201 326 326 527 16 __ 230 230 292 292 522 17 2 182 2 186 216 216 402 18 176 176 183 183 — 359 — 19 3 179 — 182 240 240 422 20�— 2 205 6 213 218 22 240 453 , - 21 7 64 14 80 139 4 143 793 22 2 98 6 106 116 2 118 224 23 225 225 280 280 • 505 24 159 3 162 2.10 210 372 25 201 6 207 2.18 6 224 431 - 26 7 156 . 5 163 218- 4 222 385 W27 5 162 8 175 206 14 220 , 395 ' 28 1 94 95 26 2 28 123 • 29 30 31 Tn.mi I -10 14727 1 85 4851 15909 I 38 I 5997 ' 10,848 • This Side . For Use by VFR Towers Only (All Approach Control Terminals • . Must use FAA Form 7230-26 • 021 I • 91.7 A . N1 E I M I N. ADP • ALL VFR Towers recording Instrument Operations (1-2) (3-4) (5-9) Control on this side 10-4 MUST COMPLETE Mo. Yr. Location(dent. Instrument Operations Remarks • F Total Day AC AT GA Military (tae) (14-1) - - 1 616.19)1 6 1 2 10 20-2311 11J 3 1 13 24-2n; 14 • 16 1 26.314 17 4 5 20 32.35)1 20 6 — 39 (36-3911 39 7 28 (40-43) 28 8 1544-47) 15 940 _ _ 22 48-51) 22 10 7 52-55) 7 - • 11 26 56.59) 26 12 16 60-63) 16 13 24 64-67) 24 14 2 21 - 68-71) 23 - 15 9 72-75) 9 16 7 76-79)� 7 (14-2) 17 - 23 16-191; 23 18 • 20 20-23)1 20 19 1 2624-27)1 27 _20 34 1 28-31)1 35 21 2 21 2 (32-35)) 25 22 • 3 21 1 (36-3911 25 23 18140-43)! 18 24 10 (44-47)1 10 .25 2 11 (48-511 13 26 1 24 (52-55)1 25 2T. I 27 (56-59)1 28 • . . 28. - 1 7 - (60.63)j 12 - - - 29 ilk1(w 67) 30 (68-71)1 31 (72-75)) rota) t '3 526 5. 1 544 (17-21) (22-26) (27-31) (32-36) v Users:Ali ATCTs • AIRPORT TRAFFIC RECORD • • •. Mail ORIGINAL of this form to Washington Office,AMS-420 thru Regional Air Traffic Division 8 7, ?i Facility Name Location '7 �g . • ANOKA (ANE) CONTROL TOWER BLAINE, MN. ti 7 A N "%e ' 0 �1 197 ( N 1my- ________t„..., (10-1)Facility Type("X"one) • (1-2) (3-4) (5-9) . Facility ' Mo. - Yr. _ Location(dent.i (11) Approach 0 B.Radar n E.VFR Tower Type If daily hoursHrs. 10thsf Control 0 C.Limited Radar Ie G.Contract Tower . Changed of operation • Towers 0 D.Non-Radar .. have change 1, , • (Continue on Reverse) (12)0 Yes enter new I (Also submit FAA Form 7230-26) hours. (77-78) (79) Airport Operations Count ITINERANT LOCAL • • Day — Tout • Special Use AC AT GA MI Total Civil Military Total (15. Operations. (47-51) 16) (17-21) (22-26) (27-31) (32-36) Itinerant (37-41) (42-46) Local 1 . 44 44. . 32 32 76 2 2 118 2 122 68 6 74 _ 196 3 2 94 96 44 44 140 4 110 110 118 118 228 5 66 66 80 • 80 146 6 5 92 3 100 138 138 238 7 2 157 159 176 20 196 8 2 109 11 122 264 4 268 390 9 1 48 2 51 46 46 97 10 49 2 51 44 44 r 95 11 3 80 16 99 86 2 88 187 12 113 2 115 102 102 217 13 1 152 2 155 216 2 218 -373 ^ 14 2 112 114 138 138 252 15 37 37 18 18 55 16 _ 2 53 55 38 38 93 17 2 92 94 38 38 132 _ 18 g 198 280 280 47 19 20 1 179 180 344 344 524 21 2 27 29 42 42 71 22 2 50 2 54 38 2 40 94 23 4 103 8 115 80 6 86 201 24 99 2 101 54 6 60 161 25 103 7 110 152 6 158 268 28 53 53 66 66 119 0 27y 2 118 120 88 88 .208 • — - 28 107 2 109 126 . 126 , 235 29 5 95 3 103 141 141 244 30 137 8 145 162 • -162 307 31 2 156 4 162 218 4 222 384 Total 4/ 13, 107 76 3,230 13,577 58 3,635 6,865 — cote. AT 7,1111_00 . This Side For Use by VFR Towers Only • 0 (All Approach Control Terminals Must use FAA Form 7230-26 -- 0 19 7 - ALL VFR Towers recording I I 1 A I N I E I M I N. ADP Instrument Operations (1-2) (3-4) (5-9) Control on this side 10-4 MUST COMPLETE Mo. Yr. Location (dent. Instrument Operations Remarks _ Total Day AC AT GA Military (10-E) (14-1) ._ ; -- {16-1911 8 . _-. .2 -- 2 3_ {2o-23)1 2 3 - -- s - 3 5 {2.-2n; 3 5 4 6 (28-311; 6 5 (32.3511' 19 -_- _.�_..-.._---- ____ .... ..14 ._ -+_ 6 25 (36.391125 _7.._- -- — --- ,.___4_1_...-. ___._. {eo-43) 3__ ----��.—__�.—_ _ 1____________f_— 8 -- --f----- 8 _ 17 - _{44-471 1 Z 2 16 —2 148-51)1 2 0 _ — 1 13 (62.55,' 14 11 2 (56-59) 2 12 -._- 8 (60-63) 8 13 12 (64-67) 12 14 21 !68-71) 21 . t5 17 (72-75), 17 16 21 (76-19)1 21 (14-2) 17 1 15 (16-1e 16 18 12 ;20-2311 12 19 1 ({ (24-27)1 1 4 • 20 20 (28-31) • 1 20 1 21 _ _.--2_ __,___1.L_ .. ._(32.36)1_. 12._.. {36.39)1 1.1 22 �—2 - — 14� -- --i-�' 23 {40 4311 24 2 2 ,44-47)1 2 2 .25 15 1 (48-5111 16 26 2 (52.55( • 1 2 27 1 24 (56-59)1 25 4110 9 1 7 1 (60.63)( 23 1 1 7 (64-67)1 1 R 30 1 6 (68"71)11 1 6 T 1 31 7.1 (72-75)) 71 Total 12 492 4 1508 (17-21) (22-26) (27-31) (32-36) v : sic..:::.:;;..lw.:.1:. T. t o .. . UK=All ATM'sC__f= AIRPORT TRAFFIC RECORD p ac-g� ^ • . 7 • Mail ORIGINAL of this form to Washington Office.AMS-420 thru Regional Air Traffic Division Q e Location - t Facility Name�� 11 t•'2„. 6 A l NI E Mr (ANOKA (ANE.)___A BLAINE, MN. .55449 T_ (1-2) (3-4) (5-9) (10-1)Facility Type("X"one) Facilitjr Mo• Yr. Location(dent. Type If daisy hours Hrs. 1pths (11) Approach 0 B.Radar ❑ E.VFR Tower of operation ISI G.Contract Tower • Changed Control 0 C.Limited Radar •:- have change:l. - Towers 0 D.Non-Radar enter new • (Continue on Reverse) (12)❑ Yes hours. (77-78)_ _ 79) (Also submit FAA Form 7230-26) Airport Operations Count ITINERANT LOCAL Total spacial use -- Day • AT (3* MI Total Civil Military Total pperationa (47-51) AC Local (16) (17-21) 0-26) (27-31) (32-36) llinarant (37.411 (2- 44)62 2 64 119 2 1 54 • 184 90 90 274 • 2 184 132 233 3 101 101 95 842 84 .. 179 4 3 92 • 85 64 • 64 . • . 149 • s 2 83 81 82 66 66 148 i 6 1 240 449 { 7• 203 6 209 240 � 8 1 80 81 102 102 308 f g 9 164 164 144 144 12 12 48 to 3 33 74 267 11 3 190 193 74 138 12ilnillirMil 78 60 60 6 148 13 : 8251 14IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 23 28 2880 168 15 . . :8 80 16 72 177 17 104 105 72 10 10 50 40 18 1 39 4 86 209 19 I 82 5858 . 133 20 75 75• 296 296 • 391 21 IIIIIIIINIIIIIIII 22 37 3 40 62 62 102 6 23 6 6 24 2 66 2 . 70 . 24 24 94 zs 21 21 16 16 '37 26 73 • 25 47 47 26 27 4 60 • 64 64 64 . 128 28 64 64 104 104 168 165 206 2.06 371 29 165 2 61 2 65 96 994 1 96 16166 1 30 94 42 42 31 • ')Al 7 1 A I 2662 12484 ' 6 _____ _L.2_.___2_2 2 Q. er72so-C This Side For Use by VFR Towels Only • (All Approach Control Terminals . Must use FAA Form 7230-26 1 2y 916 A INHEIM IN ADP • ALL VFR Towers recording (1-2) (3-4) (5-9) Control Instrument Operations '10-4 on this side . -- •- . - • . " MUST COMPLETE Mo. Yr. Location(dent. Instrument Operations Remarks - • - . - 1 Total Day AC AT GA Military (10-E) . � (14-1) . 1 G V - (16-191• 2 0 2 17 (20-23) 17 3 19 (24.27) 19 4 3 3 8 (28-31) 41 5 2 3 2 _ (32-35), 3 4 1 28 • (38.39) 29 6 7 18 (40.43) 18 8 0 8 (44.17) 8 9 29 (48-51) • 29 W0 3 14 (52-55) 17 113 2 8 (56-59) 31 . - 12 _ 3 6 0 (50-63) 6 3 . 13 1 31 (64-67) 3 2 14 15 (6a-71) 15 • 15 10 (72-75) I0 16 r_—. — 27 (78.79)27 (14-2) 17 40 (16-19); 40 18 1 2 9 (20-23)j 3 0 19 30 (24.27)1 30 20 27 (28.31)!27 21 18 (32-35)1 18 22 15 (36-39); 15 23 6 (40-43) 6 24 1 15 (44-47) 16 .25 3 (48-51)1 3 26 18 (52-55); 18 27 17 (56-59►{ 17 g28 12 (60.63){ 12 .. 29 12 (64.67)1 12 30 2 12 1 (88-7111 15 31 8 (72.75)! 8 Total 19 6 4 6 1 1 6 6 6 (17-21) (22-26) (27-31) (32-36) -. _-;�.: -.l .,mai. .. :.-a: "i.; :.5,:.''.:....ifn........-.n.... n..........•\'-..L,-_...... - - .. moi... i. s..t, .. ... ._..... Users:Aq ATCTs •_.• AIRPORT TRAFFIC RECORD '' =' 9+-- - Mail ORIGINAL of this form to Washington Office.AMS-420 thru Regional Air Traffic Division DE0 3 ` 19•. Facility Name Location • `� 9 '6 �� ANOKA (ANE) CONTROL TOWER ELAINE, MINNESOTA (1-2) (3-4) (5-9) (10-1)Facility Type("X"one) Mo. Yr. Location(dent. Facility Type If daily hours Hrs. 10ths (11) Approach 0 B.Radar 0 E.VFR Tower of operation ® Changed Control 0 C.Limited Radar G.Contract Tower g have trade.1, Towers 0 D.Non-Radar (12)❑ Yes enter new • I (Continue on Reverse) hours. (77-78) (79) 1.-� (Also submit FAA Form 7230-26) Airport Operations Count • LOCAL Special U. ITINERANT Total • V--i----- -- MI Total Civil Mllituy Total Operations (47-51) AC AT OA Local al (15 Itinerant (37 41) l42 46) le) (/7-21) (22-28) (21-31) (32-36) • 1 159 159 173 173 332 249 454 2 205 205 243 61. 616 4 342 73 40 40 113 4 73 44 5 40 40 4 4 • 62 69 71 56 56 127 7 6 175 2 183 209 2 211 394 168 168 305 137 - 6 4 129 4184 331 e 147 103 1147 813 113 216 �0 103 lIl 140 140 251 11 4 107 287 12 2 151 154 314 13 8 150 2 160 154 14 5 158 163 154 154 317 i 0 29 15 29 29 0 i 0 33 17 299 16 333 10 - 10 39 18 118 2 120 7Z0 4 74 194134 235 1 98 2 101 132 2 19 20 46 46 26 26 72 82 82 91 91 173 21 80 4 84 151 151 235 22120 191 311 120 100 193 193 293 24 100 1 165 2 168 94 94 .2.62 • 26 4 13 ; . � • ,T 2 159 161 145 e6 88 88 96 96 18496 159 ,e 2 61 63 96 21 <o 19 umi19 2 `1 ci 1 1 17 _— 3437 I 347/ , 13492 6931 r,ic• eT 793(}-9 This Side For Use by VFR Towers Only • .b • (All'Approach Control Terminals • Must use FAA Form 7230-26 1 1 I - " 6 A 1 1 9 I N IE ADP ALL VFR Towers recording . : • • (1-2) (3-4) (5-9) Control Instrument Operations - 10tr on this side MUST COMPLETE • Mo. Yr. Location(dent. ( Instrument Operations Remarks . 1 Total .. . Day AC AT GA Military (10-E) • (14-1) • 1 2 6 (16-19) 2 6 . 2 22 (20-23) 22 3 14 . . (24-27) 14 . .. . _ - - 4 2 50 (28-31) 52 5 . 2 8 .-. (32-35) - 2 8 . ' . ti 2 - 3 9 . (36-39) 41 7 • 1 2 2 440.43)* 2 3 8 . 15 (44-47)1 15 Ay__ - 1 9 os-sul 1 9 21 .. . (52-55)1.. 21 - 11 2 0 '• (56-59) 2 0 • 12 18 • (60-63) 18 . 13 16 . . (64.67) 16 14 46 • •-• (68-71) 46 - 1s 9 (72-75)1 9 16 13 (76-79)1 13 1 -- (14-2) 17 6 (18-19)1 6 18 3 4 •.).''" (20-23)1 3 4 192 0 • . (24-27)1 2 0. . 20 23 (28-31)1 23 21 .. 2 3 (32-35 23 • 22 19 (36-39)11 19 • 23 ' . 4 •- (40.43)1 • 4 24 11 (44-47)j 11 • .25 3 0 (48.51)1 3 261 Kai I ' Lf 27 3 0 .. -- (56-59) 3 p . _ .. . . - • _ 1- 2 (64-874 z 9 30 1 9 ' - (66-71)1 1. 9 • 31 . 111 (72-75)1 Total 7 682 .1 1 690 (17-21) (22-26) (27-31) (32-36) v C ...-; j" r': - Users:All ATCTs , AIRPORT TRAFFIC RECORD O NO V"r4_:_.199E- -- - Mail ORIGINAL of this form to Washington Office,AMS-420 thru Regional Air Traffic Division 199CLocation Li v a g Facility Name 8891 AIRPORT ROAD ANOKA CONTROL TOWER (ANE) MIRE! "'''"" BL IRE; MINNESOTA 55449 ;" :•1'��.4 .gll 6 A;I NIE.1 MIN (10-1)Facility Type("X"one) (1-2) (3-4) (5-9) Facilitjr Mo. Yr. Location(dent. hours (11) Approach 0 B.Radar gi E.VFR Tower Type If daily Hrs. 10ths ti of• on opera Control 0 C.Limited Radar 0 G.Contract Tower Changed p c a have change 1, Towers ® D.Non-RadarQ�— 21 (Continue on Reverse) (12)❑ Yes enter new (Also submit FAA Form 7230-26) hours. (77-78) (79) Airport Operations Count ITINERANT LOCAL - - i I Total Special Use Oay AC AT GA MI Total Civil Military Total •{15operations (47-51) 16) (17-21) (22.28) (27-31) (32-36) Itinerant (37-41) (�2•�ej local 1 3 185 3 191 131 1 132 323 2 2 156 2 160 101 101 261 3 3 188 191 136 - .136 327 i . 4 _ 212 212 181 181 393 .5 240 2 242 160 160 402 06 7 250 250 184 8 192 442 2 229 231 149 149 380 8 2 210 4 216 104 4 108 324 9 178 4 182 86 86 268 10 3 264 267 345 4 349 616 11 9 186 195 132 132 327 12 270 3 273 230 4 234 507 13 240 8 248 219 2 _ 221 469 14 135 135 76 76 211 15 6 1 221 227 _ 198 L98 1 16 s 226 8 240 201 203 -. --° 17 1 38 2 41 12 1 9 9-3 18 8 101 L 111 92 92 203 19 179 2 181 110 110 291 20 138 2 140 75 75 215 21 3 1_52 2 157 176 176 333 22 79 79 42 42 121 23 1 66 67 44 44 111 24 4 95 2 101 151 151 252 4 163 2 169 167 167 336 2s , B 36 36 13 13 49 27 123 123 104 104 227 28 4 222 226 238 238 464 • 29 1 18 19 6 6 25 30 2 42 44 6 6 , 50 2 1061 1 109 78 78 187 31 , ,, V)n /. 7 i 7S 1 1472 1 9035 I I �.�. . . • This Side • For Use by VFR Towers Only • . • (All Approach Control Terminals Must use FM Form 7230-26 • 1 -- .0 9. -6. : :-..A .N _:E•._.-•bi' .N ' • - - . •ADP ALL VFR Towers recording (1-2) (3-4) - .- . (5-9) - - Control Instrument Operations Control on this side MUST COMPLETE Mo. Yr. - Location(dent. • Instrument Operations Remarks Total • - Day AC AT GA Military (to-e) ' (14-1) • 1 1 2 4 (16-1911 2 25 2 3 0 3 (20-23(1 3 3 (24-27)1 3 12 4 9 (28-31)1 57 7 (32-3511 7 6 11 2 (38-3911 1 3 i 1 - 7 14 (40.43)1 14 ,.- 15 (4441)1 15 8 • 14 (48.51+_)1 14 - 10 1 8 (52-5511 1 8 • 11 2 3 (56.5911 2 3 t2 16 (60-63)1 16 t3 10 (64.67)1 10 14 • (68.7111 26 t5 37 (72-7511 37 16 2 4 6 (76-7911 4 8 (14-2) 17 1 2 6 (16.19)1 2 7 18 2 . 2 44_____ (20-2311 2 6 19 8 (24.2n1 8 20 19 (28-31)) 19 21 1 31 (32-35)1 3 2 22 3 0 36-39)1 3 0 23 1 4 4 ;40-43)1 4 5 24 2 3 5 44.41)1 .25 - 1 2 4 ;48-5»i 25 26 3 2 (52-5511 33 2 27 2 9 (56.59)1 2 9 1 25 (°°-63) 25 29 12 (6447)1 12 30 13 (66.71)) 13 1 31 1 2 0 (72-75)1 21 Total 12 684 5 1701 (17.21) (22-26) (27-31) (32.36) Evans moved to amend S. F. No. 1905, the second unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows: Page 59, after line 21, insert: �ec. 90. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 473 .621, is amended by adding a subdivision to read: Subd. 9. [ANOKA COUNTY-BLAINE AIRPORT.] The commission shall not expend any funds for the planning or construction of capital improvements at the Anoka County-Blaine airport that are in conflict with the Second Judicial District Court Stipulation and Order No. 454984, dated July 28, 1986, governing future development at the Anoka County-Blaine airport. " Page 69, line 15, delete "Section 89 applies" and insert "Sections 89 and 90 apply" Renumber the sections in sequence and correct internal references Amend the title accordingly A roll call was requested and properly seconded. The question was taken on the Evans amendment and the roll was called. There were 76 yeas and 57 nays as follows: Those who voted in the affirmative were: Anderson,I. Garcia Kahn Mariani Pawlenty Solberg Bakk Greenfield Kalis Marko Paymar Swenson,D. Biernat Greiling Kelso McCollum Pelowski Tomassoni lson Haas Kinkel McGuire Peterson Trimble audhary Hasskamp Koskinen Milbert Pugh Tunheim Clark Hausman Kubly Mullery Rest VanDellen Dawkins Hilty Larsen Munger Rhodes Wagenius Delmont Huntley Leighton Murphy Rukavina Wejcman Dorn Jaros Lieder Ness Schumacher Wenzel Entenza Jefferson Long Olson,E. Sekhon Winter Evans Johnson,A. Luther Opatz Skare Spk.Carruthers Farrell Johnson,R. Macklin Orfield Skoglund Folliard Juhnke Mares Otremba Slawik Those who voted in the negative were: Abrams Dehler Knight Molnau Seagren Tuma Anderson,B. Dempsey Knoblach Mulder Seifert Vickerman Bettermann Erhardt Koppendrayer Nornes Smith Weaver Bishop Finseth Kraus Olson,M. Stanek Westfall Boudreau Goodno Krinkie Osskopp Stang Westrom Bradley Gunther Kuisle Ozment Sviggum Wolf Broecker Harder Leppik Paulsen Swenson,H. Workman Commers Holsten Lindner Reuter Sykora Daggett Jennings Mahon Rifenberg Tingelstad Davids Kielkucki McElroy Rostberg Tompkins 41,e motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted. MC145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 Lwow o fMhrnesote Cities Phone: (612) 281-1200 • (800) 925-1122 Glide promotingenro Fax: (612) 281-1299 • TDD (612) 2814290 To: Minnesota Mayors From: The League of Minnesota Cities Re: Help for flood affected cities Cities helping cities—it's a natural phenomenon when disaster strikes. City response to the unprecedented flooding is overwhelming. We heard from many cities last week: Cities needing flood assistance information,and cities offering their equipment, personnel and even money to meet those needs. With that in mind,we've created the Cities Helping Cities program. Through the program,we plan to match cities that need help in restoring municipal operations and services with cities that have equipment and personnel available. We've spent the last few days calling cities directly affected by floods. They told us what help they need, and we've entered that information into a database. If your city needs assistance and has not been contacted,call Theresia Perry at(612)2814200 or(800)925-1122. • Now we need to know what is available. The second page of this fax lists equipment and personnel needed by flood affected cities. If your city is able to provide assistance,please complete the form and fax it back to the League. We will then try to match up needs with the assistance available. Fax your completed forms to the League at (612) 281-1235. Keep in mind that clean-up and recovery efforts will go on for many months in the most severely flooded cities. Even if your city can't help now,help will be needed in the coming months Many cities have asked us if they could donate money to help flood-stricken cities. Hutchinson has already donated$5,000. Roseville wants to pledge some of its state snowplowing money and hopes other cities will consider similar action. To help cities and other organizations make donations, the League has created the LMC Flood Recovery Fund. This fund is being handled by the League of Minnesota Cities Research Foundation. All money received will be distributed to cities needing assistance to restore municipal operations. For more information,contact Finance Director Dave DuBord at(612)281-1200. Donations can be sent to: The League of Minnesota Cities' Flood Recovery Fund 145 University Ave. W. St. Paul,MN 55102-2044. • Thank you for your help. If you have any questions,contact Theresia Perry at(612)281-1200 or (800) 925-1122. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER T M J f"1T I T^1 ♦I II I The followingCities flelpingg iC• •thhtw. Cities following, heap,safe ill be needed ,s gi please circle thea ty and welfare of citizens.to get affect co °r personnel mould be sy p�Opriate item,list the nIfyour city is bl Mies back in ai able. Fax this formumber available to provide the business E pment back to the League a;12(61 722;62e8a;e1w2hendWhen the y equipment the BVI 35, How many? Perso When available? noel Front end loaders mow'many? Motor When available? waders Administrative personnel Sweepers Building officials _`_-�-- D' p trucks Civil engineers Generators EMT's Pumps fighters •es Office help Traffic contTo/signs Operation Communications e Police offers equipment Other Records management Vehicle mechanics Water/Waste water Plant operators Other ntact person ne 0 Title Fax have any questions, Contact Thp*.a. _ ,. Duane McCarty 4 780-7356 1715/5/97 011:47 AM D 1/1 May 5, 1997 oft Dear Senator Frederickson: Last week (May 19, 1997) an amendment to S.F. 1905, regarding the Anoka County Airport, was passed by the House of Representatives. That amendment directs that the Metropolitan Airports Commission not expend any funds for the planning or construction of capital improvements at the Anoka County-Blaine airport in conflict with a Second Judicial District Court Stipulation and Order No. 454984, dated July 28, 1986. In 1984, the City of Mounds View filed suit in Second Judicial District Court against the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission for violations of a 1980 law regarding restrictions on upgrading minor classed airports to intermediate classed use status. MSA 473. 641 Subd. 4. Notwithstanding any other law, the metropolitan airports commission shall not use revenue from any source, as described by section 473. 608, for construction of air facilities to expand or upgrade the use of an existing metropolitan airport from minor use to intermediate use status as defined by the metropolitan development guide, aviation chapter, adopted pursuant to section 473. 145. HIST: 1975 c 13 s 112; 1977 c 417 s 12; 1980 c 614 s 154 . As a result of the aforementioned lawsuit, the above referenced Court Order was handed down by Second Judicial District Court in Ramsey County 41, on July 28, 1986. Several of the restrictions on improvements at the Anoka County Airport (stipulated in the Court Order) are again up for reconsideration by the Metropolitan Airports Commission via a pending Long-Term Comprehensive Plan Update for the airport. The City of Mounds View has petitioned the Metropolitan Airports Commission to prepare it' s Plan in full compliance with the Court Order. It is the City of Mounds View's position that there is no compelling reason to include non-compliant field additions in the Anoka County Airport Comprehensive Plan Update. Inclusion of the above mentioned amendment to S.F. 1905 reinforces Judicial authority in this matter and hopefully will encourage MAC Staff to help avoid unneeded litigation. The City Council of Mounds View is opposed to using our Local Government Aid payments that are intended to hold down property taxes, for forced lawsuits that other reasonable actions can avoid. WE URGENTLY NEED YOUR SUPPORT FOR THIS LAW. Thank You in advance for your consideration. I will contact you personally as both your own and the Senate schedule permits. Respectfully, Duane W. McCarty, Mayor City of Mounds View