Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packets - 1997/06/02
i - AG :::::::::: Items Discussed Per Consensus 1. Discussion of Hiring a Design Firm to Develop a Highway 10 Design Theme. Staff Report No. 97-2113WS (Presented by:Pam Sheldon, Director of Community Development and Cath Bennett, Director of Economic Development) 2. Discussion on Temporary Help in Community Development for Summer Season. Staff Report No. 97- 2114WS (Presented by:Pam Sheldon, Director of Community Development) • 3. Discussion to Review Proposals for City Hall HVAC System. Staff Report No. 97-211 S WS (Presented by:Mike Ulrich, Director of Public Works) 4. Discussion Regarding Update of Pay Equity Compliance. Staff Report No. 97-2116WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 5. Discussion on Setting Up Next Step Regarding MAC. Staff Report No. 97-2117WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 6. Reviewal of Council/StaffTeam Building. Staff Report No. 97-2118WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) Page Two 06-02-97 Work Session i 7. Discussion on Draft Resolution No. 5123 Regarding Approval of Youth Initiative Grant Agreement. Staff Report No. 97- 2119WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 8. Discussion on Liveable Communities Demonstration Grant Application. Staff Report No. 97-2120WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 9. Discussion on Bel Rae Update. Staff Report No. 97- 2121WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) 10. Discussion on Council/Employee Appreciation Outing, June 20. Staff Report No. 97- 2122WS (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) • • Memo May 30, 1997 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator Re: June 2, 1997 City Council Workshop Monday evening's meeting should not be too difficult. Here's what we have: Item 1-Highway 10 Design:Pam will present this item as a follow up to the Council's discussions of the U of M Design team study. Connected to this is Item 8 - Liveable Communities Grant which could be utilized towards achieving some of the hopes of the ring road concept. Item 2-Temporary Help in Community Development: Pam and I have discussed this and I have concurred with her assessment of the department's work load. This plan as outlined is not intended at this time to resolve work load problems permanently, but should give Pam and myself some time to give further assessment to the work load of the department as we develop the 1998 budget discussions. At this time, I am not comfortable to addressing the long term work load without more understanding of acceptable budgetary levels for 1998. This item does not normally need Council approval as a personnel item, but may considering the use of contingency funds to assist. I will be checking into this prior to the need for formal Council action. Item 3-City Hall HVAC:Mike will present the status of the HVAC bidding and the rest of the City Hall improvements we have discussed at past meetings. Item 4-Pay Equity Compliance: The City has been notified that it is now in full compliance with pay equity requirements. Apparently we were out of compliance during our last compliance check in January of 1996. As stated in Lynette Morgan's memo, not only is the City now in compliance, we must note acknowledging this for the state. Item 5-Next Step with MAC: I have been in touch with Mark Ryan of MAC on when to get going again on the airport issue. He has indicated that MAC will likely get their public hearings going in July on their plan amendment. If this is the case, I would like to briefly discuss getting our group together with our legislators and organizing with our sister cities prior to those hearings starting. Item 6-Review of Council/Staff Team Building: I thought our team building session went well last Wednesday evening. Since this is our first meeting after the team building session, we should probably take a little time to review it for the public. There did seem to be some interest in the Council subcommittee concept and maybe we can talk about this some more too. The subcommittees I think would break down well as community and economic development, finance and personnel administration, golf parks and recreation, public works, and police. The groups would be called together by the department head and would deal with issues that are more effectively dealt with when staff and council can confer prior to going to a regular meeting. This would mean some discretion as to how important something is would be exercised, but in general I think it could prove helpful to all in adding to policy understanding for the City. Item 7 - Resolution regarding Youth Initiative Grant Agreement: This past Thursday Mary Saarion and I met with the Department of Children, Families & Learning regarding the grant requirements that come with the Bel Rae project. One requirement is that the pass a resolution approving the grant agreement. I will talk with you more on Monday about this and will likely have the resolution and grant agreement before the Council at the June 9 or June 23 meeting. Item 8-Liveable Communities Grant Application:Pam and I will be attending a workshop Friday that is required if the City were to decide to apply for a Liveable Communities grant. The application is enclosed and fairly well outlines what it can be used for. Staff's thoughts are that the ring road/ITighway 10 corridor could use that kind of assistance. We would be interested in the Council's thoughts on this. Item 9 - Bel Rae Update: I will be trying to give you updates on the project status as we go on through the summer. We now have better demolition bids and I can share those on Monday. The dance flooring appears to be a problem as to saving the floor as it is. I would like the Council's thoughts on saving pieces of the actual floor for souvenirs or raffles or something like that. . Item 10 - Council/Employee Appreciation Outing: Once or twice a year we have appreciation outing for employees and Council. We would like your feedback on an evening golf outing at the Bridges this month. Funds are budgeted for this and can be expended for this purpose by law when i the Council finds it in the public interest to do so. Sometimes these things are a little awkward where concerns develop over what is appropriate, so what I am proposing is to set aside tee times for employees and Council members and their families, with food at the club house afterwards. John Hammerschmidt will make a budget out for this. In the past, this has been used as an opportunity to recognize various employees as well. Duane may not be at the meeting Monday evening. There is a Ramsey County meeting regarding the placement of a jail in our district somewhere and he plans on attending that meeting. Otherwise, we should have a good meeting. See you then and have a nice weekend. Item No. Staff Report No.97-0v 3 105 i Meeting Date: June 2, 1997 i Type of Business: Work Session WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Cathy Bennett,Economic Development Director (' Pam Sheldon, Community Development Director • Item Title/Subject: Discussion of Hiring a Design Firm to Develop a Highway 10 Design Theme Date of Report: May 30, 1997 Issue: Staff is seeking authorization from the City Council to solicit proposals from 2-4 design firms to develop a design theme for the Highway 10 corridor. This design theme would address such items as gateways, and landscaping, lighting, fencing and sidewalks along the corridor from County Road H2 to Silver Lake Road. Discussion: There are two sizeable projects which are underway in the Highway 10 corridor: the O'Neil PUD and the D.W. Jones PUD. Both of the projects have substantial Highway 10 frontage and they are looking to the City for guidance on what type of design theme is to be established in the corridor, so that they can coordinate with this theme. In addition, the City will be going to MnDOT to discuss the possibility of a ring road, and a full movement, signalized intersection at Edgewood. We would like to discuss with them at the same time, whether MnDOT is willing to give easements along the edge of the highway right-of-way to allow sidewalks, landscaping, fencing and special lighting. It would be very helpful to have a design and perspective drawings to better illustrate an overall design package, and to make the ideas vivid, rather than just dealing with a description in words. Time is of the essence, since we are gearing up to meet with MnDOT in the very near future. We are proposing to pay for the design work from the Highway 10 portion of the City's tax increment fund. Action Requested: • Authorize staff to solicit proposals from 2-4 design firms for the development of a Highway 10 design theme, and to return with a recommendation to the Economic Development Authority as to which firm to hire. • Item No. gg Staff Report No.g7 ILLS Meeting Date: June 2, 1997 Type of Business: Work Session WK:Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Chuck Whiting, City Clerk-Administrator Item Title/Subject: Discussion of Temporary Help in Community Development for Summer Season Date of Report: May 30, 1997 Issue: The Community Development Department is experiencing difficulties keeping up with workload during this summer season. We are requesting authorization to hire temporary help during the months of June through September in the areas of code enforcement and building inspection, and to help with meeting minutes. Discussion: The staff is the Community Development Department have discussed the current turnaround times for handling different department functions. They are experiencing problems with maintaining customary levels of service for both code enforcement and building inspection. The current situation is as follows: Code Enforcement The department's goal is to follow-up on a complaint to do the first site inspection within 1-2 days of receiving the complaint, and then to send a letter to the property notifying them of the violation within 1-2 days of the site visit. At this time, it often takes 4-5 days to inspect the site, and 4-5 days to write the letters. Jim Ericson puts a re-inspection date in these letters, when he expects to revisit the site to see if the violation is corrected. It is taking a week beyond this date to get re-inspections done. Code enforcement is complex and takesconsiderable negotiating and follow through. It is slipping. Community Development could use temporary help to inspect the sites, take pictures, prepare the letters, and do the reinspections. Jim Ericson would still be the contact person in dealing with the property owner and the neighbors, and handling any negotiations or conflict situations. There is considerable competition for Jim's time from development review. Building Plan Review and Inspections In the past, Community Development has been able to do plan review of routine items in 2-3 days, and more complicated projects within 5-7 days. Inspections could be scheduled for the same day or next day after we received a request. Right now, they are booked for inspections for about a week when people call. Suffice it to say, residents are not very happy about this situation. Because of the inspection load, plan review is backed up. We made a decision this week to farm • out the ZEP Manufacturing and Bel Rae plan reviews to independent plan reviewers in order to City of Mounds View Staff Report May 30, 1997 Page 2 achieve a reasonable turnaround. The cost per hour is $40-$50. Plan review is taking 5-7 days in general. The department has been contacted by a student at a local technical school, where he is studying building inspection, about summer work. This type of individual would work well to fill our needs in both code enforcement and building inspection because it is similar type work, i.e. applying codes to a specific situation. The department would have the temporary person handle minor inspections like sheds, fences, driveways, decks, etc. Office Operations All of the Community Development Secretary's is being used to just keep up on building permits. The department is having trouble getting to Planning Commission minutes, letters scheduling housing inspections, and public notices. The department anticipates problems with getting letters sent with the housing inspection results. We are requesting that we hire a recording secretary to handle Planning Commission meetings, similar to the arrangement with Tammy Safke for Council meetings. The person would attend the meetings and prepare the minutes. It is actually cheaper for us to hire someone to be the recording secretary than continuing to pay Barb Benesch for attending the meetings. Jennifer Bergman has taken on getting the housing inspection letters sent. It would be helpful to be able to hire temporary office help if needed with the next round of letters on housing inspection results. Sources of Funds Staff is recommending that the source of funding for temporary help in code enforcement and building inspection be paid from contingency. The cost for hiring a recording secretary would be paid by salary savings from not having to pay Barb Benesch overtime to attend the meetings. Action Requested: • Authorize staff to hire temporary staff in the range of$8.00-$10.00 per hour to assist with building inspection and code enforcement for June through September • Authorize the hiring of a recording secretary for Planning Commission meetings. This would be a year round arrangement. • Authorize staff to hire temporary office staff to assist with housing inspection letters, if needed. N:\DATA\USERS\PAMS\SHARE\CTTYCOUN\CC-COR\TEMPHELP.REP Item No. 3 Staff Report No. q7 4,25 Meeting Date: June 2, 1997 Type of Business: W.K. WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda; CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works Item Title/Subject: Review and Discussion of City Hall HVAC Proposal Date of Report: May 29, 1997 At an earlier Council work session this spring the City Hall HVAC was briefly discussed. At that time staff had received one quote from a mechanical engineering consultant regarding a detailed survey of the building and HVAC systems. Staff had also mentioned that we were contacting a performance based contractor to inquire into their program. Since that time staff has provided another mechanical engineering consultant and NorAm Energy Management a tour of the building. A quote from the mechanical consultant was also received. The quotes are as follows: Wentz Associates Inc. $11,450.00 Ericksen Ellison& Assoc. Inc $11,350.00 to 12,350.00 NorAm Energy Management is a firm similar to Honeywell in some manners and different in others. The primary difference is that NorAm solicits bids on equipment specifications,provides bid documentation for review, and consultants its clients on bid award. The company is still the, quote, general contractor and construction manager for the project. Their program provides for satisfactory results in performance and energy savings. Granted their program will include very much the same in the range of engineering surveys, tests and associated expenses as the private consultants. From the meetings with NorAm, staff feels comfortable in recommending they prepare a proposal for the City's consideration. Members of NorAm will be in attendance at the meeting to present their program and answer any questions Council might have. Staff would also recommend NorAm design the sprinkler system for City Hall. Staff seeks Council direction in proceeding with the HVAC replacement, sprinkler system construction and remodeling project. Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works • Item No. 4 Staff Report No. 97-.2//4c, WS Meeting Date: 6-2-97 SType of Business: WK WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Co ncil From: Lynnette Morga Item Title/Subject: Update of Pay E ity Compliance Date of Report: May 29, 1997 Every three years the City is required to submitted materials in accordance with the Local Government Pay Equity Act. In January 1996, the City submitted salary information based on figures from December 31, 1995. Mounds View did not meet certain requirements, resulting in a non-compliance ruling by the Department of Employee Relations. The City had a grace period to meet the requirements and submitted a new report with salary information as of February 1997 which indicated the City passes the statistical, salary range and exceptional service pay tests. To finalize the procedure, the City Council needs to approve the Pay Equity Report before being sent to DOER. I have attached the required information which will be sent to DOER. This item will be placed on June 9, 1997 meeting for Council approval. S J, Pay Equity Implementation Report ,s,,, Send completed report to: Pay Equity Coordinator For Department Use Only Department of Employee Relations 200 Centennial Building ( I Postmark Date of RAI 658 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55155-1603 (612) 296-2653 (Voice) 1 I Jurisdiction ID Number _ (612) 297-2003 (TDD) c Name of Jurisdiction so Ci1-y of M ounds View a 4 94 City 0 County 0 School 0 Other: "I = Address ; i.0 2401 /�i 9hwa.y l v City VI t State 155112 m — Contact Person A. Lynnetre. Moran 1Phone (642- ) "11 ?-X13 0 The job evaluation system used measured skill, effort, 0 No salary ranges/performance differences. responsibility and working conditions and the same system was used for all classes of employees. ❑ Check here if both of the following apply; otherwise, leave Check the system used: blank. 0 State Job Match a. Jurisdiction does not have a salary range for any job class. 0 Designed Own (specify) b. Upon request,jurisdiction will supply documentation = showing that inequities between male and female o A, Consultant's System (specify) classes are due to performance differences. PAZ Note: Do not include any documentation regarding 0 Other (specify) performance with this form. • L m 0 An official notice has been posted at Ts 0 Health insurance benefits for male and female classes loch rbOrn bulletin rd 1111) 3 of comparable value have been evaluated and: (prominent locanon) Q 0 There is no difference and female classes are not informing employees that the Pay Equity Implementation at a disadvantage. Report has been filed and is available to employees upon m request. A copy of the notice has been sent to each exclusive a ❑ There is a difference and the maximum salaries representative, if any, and also to the public library. The report p„ reported include the monthly amount paid by the was approved by: employer for health insurance. �"� �7t�l'tU 1 1 (governing body) Q Information in this report is complete and accurate. PikinG .LCQf.1-1T (cn/ef elected official,print) Q The report includes all classes of employees over • which the jurisdiction has final budgetary approval authority. (chief elected official,signature) MayOr (title) (dare) Result from Salary Range Worksheet 4 _ " l ti 103. 70 H F: % is the result of average years to salary range maximum for male classes divided by the average years to salary range maximum for female classes. •1-:Results from Exceptional Service Pay Worksheet c ` Ar fl.0.; E 20% or less of male classes receive ESP. Cx= c: 0 W ;: o • % is the result of the percentage of female classes receiving ESP divided by the percentage. to=° of male classes receiving ESP. iii Ts O aa $92) at✓1�r r7 •33is the annual payroll for the calendar year just ended December 31. (Part F on Back) Id Jurisdiction: City of Mounds View Date: May 29, 1997 • Contact : Lynnette Morgan Phone: 612 784-3055 COMPLIANCE REPORT Ike statistical analysis, salary range and exceptional serviceaytest results are shown below. Part I is general information from your Pay Equity Report data. Parts II, III, and IV give you the test results . For more detail on each test, refer to the guidebook. I . GENERAL JOB CLASS INFORMATION Male Female Balanced All Job Classes Classes Classes Classes Job Classes 18 12 0 # Employees 36 15 30 0 51 Avg. Max Monthly Pay per Employee 3, 602 . 77 3, 121. 64 3, 461 .26 II. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS TEST A. UNDERPAYMENT RATIO = 66 . 7* Male Female Classes Classes a. # at or above Predicted Pay 8 2 b. # Below Predicted Pay 10 10 c. TOTAL 18 12 411 d. % Below Predicted Pay 55 . 56 83 .33 (b divided by c = d) * (Result is % of male classes below predicted pay divided by % of female classes below predicted pay. ) B . T-TEST RESULTS Degrees of Freedom(DF) = 49 Value of T = 1 .448 a. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for male jobs = $ -52 b. Avg. diff . in pay from predicted pay for female jobs = $ -182 III . SALARY RANGE TEST = 103 . 70% (Result is A divided by B) A. Avg. # of years to max salary for male jobs = 3 . 11 B. Avg. # of years to max salary for female jobs = 3 . 00 IV. EXCEPTIONAL SERVICE PAY TEST = 0 . 00% (Result is B divided by A) A. % of male classes receiving ESP 11 . 11* B. % of female classes receiving ESP 0 . 00 411 * (If 20% or less, test result will be 0 . 00) Version 3 . 0 (1993) 5/29/97 Job List Page 1 Job Male Female Total Work Max Mo. Predicted Pay III Number Class Title Empl Empl Empl Sex Points Salary Pay Difference 1 Custodian 1 0 1 M 40 2,032.81 1910.08 122.73 5 Receptionist 0 1 1 F 45 2,030.13 2112.34 -82.21 2 CSO 0 1 1 F -48 2,048.41 2233.70 -185.29 3 Video Technician 1 0 1 M 50 2,069.20 2314.61 -245.41 4 Sr. Clerk Typist 0 1 1 F 54 2,410.60 2476.62 -66.02 7 Utility Clerk 0 1 1 F 55 2,426.27 2577.33 -151.06 9 Payroll Clerk 0 1 1 F 55 2,782.93 2577.33 205.60 6 Club House Manager 1 0 1 M 60 1,716.66 2749.46 -1032.80 8 Department Secretary 0 4 4 F 60 2,760.19 2749.46 10.73 21 Maintenance 8 0 8 M 60 2,860.00 2749.46 110.54 18 Patrol Officer 10 0 10 M 72 3,669.65 3652.32 17.33 11 Human Resource Tech 0 1 1 F 75 2,903.78 3580.86 -677.08 10 Planning Associate 1 0 1 M 77 2,839.71 3710.69 -870.98 12 Housing Inspector 0 1 1 F 77 2,940.05 3710.69 -770.64 13 Athletic Supervisor 1 0 1 M 78 3,224.02 3741.10 -517.08 19 Investigator 2 0 2 M 78 3,839.65 3741.10 98.55 14 Engineering Aide 1 0 1 M 79 3,424.69 3771.51 -346.82 15 Building Inspector 1 0 1 M 79 3,589.52 3771.51 -181.99 16 Accountant 0 1 1 F 81 3,436.55 3832.32 -395.77 17 Golf Course Superintendent 1 0 1 M 81 3,539.13 3832.32 -293.19 20 Public Works Foreman 1 0 1 M 86 3,656.50 4278.38 -621.88 22 Sergeant 2 0 2 M 86 4,599.02 4278.38 320.64 Illik 23 Lieutenant 1 0 1 M 96 4,772.09 4571.21 200.88 24 Director of Econ Dev 0 1 1 F 105 4,779.20 5074.30 -295.10 25 Park and Rec Director 0 1 1 F 105 4,798.65 5074.30 -275.65 26 Community Development Director 0 1 1 F 113 5,227.25 5300.57 -73.32 27 Finance Director 1 0 1 M 113 5,214.82 5300.57 -85.75 29 Public Works Director 1 0 1 M 113 5,568.38 5300.57 267.81 28 Police Chief 1 0 1 M 119 5,335.87 5532.54 -196.67 30 City Administrator 1 0 1 M 138 6,262.51 6215.30 47.21 Illk Version 3.0 (1993) ti ♦ H C v W IV C V P` d W N N C m �_ t cL. t 4''''2 PL Ei ' T m Z a �• . v il 7 is. n • ‘: 1i--; !1‘154.. . A 3 !!:.WtdC . Z > �. �....b ‹elbs� i. i...%n 0 a o ir m 74 F 1 N 7 •� IjN v ft i I _ Z O [..... O O O O I m A I A L 1 _Hi � � v Q • + = r h r., _ ;-: I I 1-11i1.-- inC' Do. '� o a v C = n r o• a 0 " . cigh m o gic... i ,t., -.4 i N tv7oop wtN , 3 WO v 'ow � '` 3 • v � ilnIti„ ,„ fl / wø 1 N1i " a v o0 VIOr a C n n• I I l(NJ l(q.).,1 fri ics ICo 16414.) 1(>416414,11w ( •u o m _ Z 2 4. •IIIIIIIIIIIIIM11 --On 9 ,T 1c H •a •W N _ G :Q oo �J T N d y N '% 0 .. .: fls ,4%.:, T'N'er: N, -. eN • c- 1: F Gi. ;1-fs N N 0 7 . O ✓T A O A Al N Q A (� `1 = > . O N V• `1 ... j< — Y` • 111___ V' " N tr ..n o A NN� It yv• 1 = \ ` T O F g &C $. E U 1 r• r H 1 N7 O m O A U — — aMQ — ooc — oo _. bFtic ,N N I 10 ICF'''' IC> o FP 0 — _ _ 0 _ _ 01 = g,.: L © 1 A C :.n 3 3 1111: NI M 12 I'D im i-n il l-n 1-n i 7 A .• m W sz 134 I * 3 .11D1 � vNo6osit -�too � v►. :T �saR a " = 2. ...t: m Z571 2JF% . t%1 " 'F' 1/4.71 .4. :_ E' N N LI N — ri " .... .e...: . ep c ji (4,1 ..,:p. v N = '� N ^� %A W 1" O o szpl s N N N N F � N N N N r N NI �j 77 N w N °Q c c .� o CO a m es • N •e3 163 (,4 ILA C� WC� t. Ga pam = � � H a 1 -0 • Ab y7 • ` n n n n = r 1 Pay 0 .-1.C1 N N CO C 1 co O O C71 0-1 O COTE O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .� O O O O O O � a \ . o_ Ci37 ,, l = o 0 CD MIIMM4 + 114Z K CD 0 •••f1 C... 00- + + + o L+ • WO �' + CI cp3 OCn - c. o0 0 C CT 1- • cr) Ei * j + D; O O COCT' CO O_. . --1. CD /(1 ' ,1 C'nn' oN ar ! cr )g 07 FPM -A- 5 1 �A + f , METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION MAC FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL 4,4.424.16 A.M. DATE: TIME: 3 P. TO: Name: tom, 4ec,t ��. Fax Number: 7 5jfj Company Name: Name: Fax Number: • Company Name: Name: Fax Number: Company Name: •FROM: Sender's Name: Adel Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 (612) 726-8100 - Office Number (612) 726-8184 - Fax Operator (612) 726-5296 - Fax Number • Comments: 7�rr is / ,K • THIS TRANSMISSION CONSISTS OF /2 PAGES, INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE. TELECOPY OPERATOR: MAY-29-1997 15:51 METRO. AIRPORT COMM. 612 726 5296 P.02/12 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE • John Himle, Chair Alton Gasper, Vice Chair • Steve Cramer Dick Long Louis Miller Jr. Darwin Reedy Georgiann Stenerson • 'METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, June 3, 1997 2:00 p.m. Room394O. Mezzanine Level Undbergh Terminal, Wold-Chamberlain Field AGENDA ' CONSENT (Consent items listed are subject to discussion at the request of any Commissioner) • 1. JUNE ADNE LEVELS (Nigel D. Finney, Deputy Executive Director - Planning and Environment) 2. FINAL PAYMENT$ - MAC CONTRACTS a. International Arrivals Facility-Caissons b. Revenue Control Building Sprinkler System c. 1995-96 Part 150 Sound Insulation Program (L. James Fortman, Director of Airport Development) (Tom Brown, Part 150 Construction Manager) 3. CHANGE ORDERS - M CONTRACTS a. Holman Field Wetland Mitigation - Pickerel Lake b. . Part 150 Sound Insulation Program . (Robert Vorpahi, Program Development Engineer) (Tam Brown, Part 150 Construction Manager) • 4. BIDS RECEIVED - MAC CONTRACTS a. 1997 Airside Bituminous Construction - MSP b. 1997 Taxiway/Apron Construction - MSP c. Runway Redesignation - MSP d. Post Road Realignment/Reconstruction - MSP e. Obstruction Removal - Crystal Airport f. 1997 Pavement RehabiWest Building Area Annex - Anoka County- Blaine Airport g. 1997 Pavement Rehabilitation - Lake Elmo Airport . h. Part 150 Sound Insulation Program - April Bid Cycle (Gary Warren, Airport Engineer) (Tom Brown, Part 150 Construction Manager) 111 PLEASE TURN PAGE MAY-29-1997 15:51 METRO. AIRPORT COMM. 612 726 5296 P.03/12 5. REVIEW OF UPCOMING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 131h (Robert Vorpahl, Program Development Engineer) 6. RATIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OFFER (L. James Fortman, Director of Airport Development) DISCUSSION • 7. LONG TERM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE-ANOKA COUNTY-BLAINE • AIRPORT (Mark Ryan, Airport Planner) 8. MSP STORM WATER MANAGEMENT 1996-1997 STATUSEPORT (Richard B. Keinz, Director of Environment) 9. NORTH-SOUTH RUNWAY PROPERTY ACQUISITION (Nigel D. Finney, Deputy Executive Director - Planning and Environment) 10. RUNWAY 442 EXTENSION (Nigel D. Finney, Deputy Executive Director - Planning and Environment) 11. CAPITALIMPRQVEMENT PROGRAM ADJUSTMENTS (Nigel D. Finney, Deputy Executive Director- Planning and Environment) 12. PARKING UPDATE (L. James Fortman, Director of Airport Development) • 13. CONSULTANT INTERVIEWS - LINDBERGH TERMINAL COMPLEX ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES (Robert Vorpahl, Program Development Engineer) PLEASE ALLOW ADDITIONAL TIME FOR THIS MEETING DUE TO CONSULTANT INTERVIEWS. • 1 , • • MAY-29-1997 15:52 METRO. AIRPORT COMM. 612 726 5296 P.04/12 • MEMORANDUM ITEM 7 TO: Planning and Environment Committee FROM: Mark Ryan, Airport Planner (726-8129) SUBJECT: LONG TERM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ANOKA COUNTY - BLAINE AIRPORT DATE: May 22, 1997 In early 1994, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) initiated an update of the Long Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP) study for the Anoka County • Blaine Airport. MAC's Reliever Airport planning consultant,the Airport Technology and Planning Group, Inc. (AirTech) conducted this study in accordance with guidelines defined by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Metropolitan Council. An Advisory Committee, comprised of representatives from neighboring cities, airport businesses, the Metropolitan Council, and Minnesota Department of Transportation, assisted MAC staff in the development of this plan. A Summary of the Anoka County • Blaine Airport LTCP is attached (Attachment 1) for your review. A presentation regarding the plan will be given at the Committee meeting. By way of background, this planning study is an update of the 1983 Airport Master Plan (comprehensive plan), which proposed parallel runways in both the north/south and east/west directions as well as expanded aircraft hangar storage.areas and an air traffic control tower. In 1986, the environmental analysis related to implementing this development plan modified the original development concept. This modification included shifting the existing north/south runway approximately 2,600'further to the north in order to reduce aircraft overflight of the City of Mounds View, located immediately south of the airport.•The master plan was further revised to show the precision approach on Runway 25 (from east) instead of Runway 17 (from north). The current (1997) Plan Update findings conclude that general aviation activity at the Anoka County- Blaine Airport is expected to remain strong with continued emphasis on personal and small business aviation activity. Increasing demand for aircraft hangar storage area may necessitate development of the north building area within the next several years. From an environmental perspective, future improvements at the airport will result in minimum impacts. Projected aircraft noise contours remain almost entirely on the existing airport site. The Plan also looked at the effects of proposed improvements on water quality on the Airport. The most substantive recommendation involves extending the existing east/west runway 1,000 feet to the east in order to allow a balanced use of the runway system. Having near equal length runways will permit air traffic control personnel to more equally distribute aircraft operations. The next step on this Plan Update process is to solicit public input through a Hearing to be held in the vicinity of the Airport.At conclusion of the Hearing and subsequent review process, • the Plan will be returned to the Commission for final action. Following Commission action, the Plan will then be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for a finding of consistency with the Metropolitan Development Guide. P'IHY-49-1997 15:52 METRO. AIRPORT COMM. 612 726 5296 P.05'12 COMMITTEE ACTION REQUESTED; RECOMMEND TO THE COMMISSION ADOPTION OF THE LONG TERM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE ANOKA COUNTY • BLAINE AIRPORT FOR PURPOSES OF PUBLIC HEARING,AND DIRECTION THAT THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE BE ASSIGNED AS HEARING OFFICERS. bialm_W►wns " • • S • • • •I MAY-29-1997 1552 METRO. AIRPORT COMM. 612 726 5296 P.06/12 AIL • mom COUNTy. i s" to MAC 17 c� c7 '� ,U 0 •c BLAINE AIRPORT 7.q A, • Auninemm LONG-TERM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Executive Summary AILS lila THE AIRPORT'TECHNOLOGY AND PLANNING GROUP,INC. May 1997 ATTACHMENT 1 MAY-29-1997 15052 METRO. AIRPORT COMM. 612 726 5296 P.07/12 Anoka County-Blaine Airport 1 Long-Term Comprehensive Plan Update May 1997 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Executive Summary provides an overview of the recommended development options for Anoka County-Blaine Airport.These development options are reported in the Comprehensive Development Plan Update's technical report. This summary also discusses key community and environmental impacts. 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW • • The Metropolitan Airports Commission(MAC) initiated a comprehensive planning study to serve as a framework for future development activity at Anoka County-Blaine Airport. The study followed guidelines defined by.the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA)and the Metropolitan Council. An Advisory Committee,made up of representatives from the neighboring cities, airport businesses, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Department of Transportation, and MAC, reviewed the study as it was prepared. The Airport's last master plan (comprehencive plan) was completed in 1981 Since this time, a number of conditions have changed on and around the Airport, The Airport's Long-Term Comprehensive Development Plan Update was divided into four chapters. Key points from these chapters are summarized below. . A. Inventory The Inventory chapter documents the existing conditions and facilities at the Airport. Anoka County-Blaine Airport currently has a land envelope consisting of approximately 1,900 acres. The aircraft attire Airport have increased with the addition of hangar facilities. There were 431 based aircraft reported as of January 1, 1996. As of July 1996, there were 444 based aircraft at the Airport Over the last seven years, the number of operations has remained relatively constant,approximately 200,000 annual operations. Prior to the opening of the ATCT, the number of annual aircraft operations was at the airport's operational capacity threshold. • B. Summary of Aviation Activity For the nation as a whole,and the Great Lakes Region in particular,general aviation activity has been declining. The Minneapolis-St Paul area,however,has not followed this trend due to a robust economic climate and a steady growth in population. The Minneapolis-St.Paul I The Airport Technology&Planning Group,Inc (AirTech) I MAY-29-1997 15 53 METRO. AIRPORT COMM. 612 726 5296 P.08/12 • Anoka County-Blaine Airport Long-Term Comprehensive Prone Update May 1997 • area is home to numerous Fortune 500 companies,as well as to a very active small business I environment. As the number of jobs, population, and area income rise, the use of small business and pleasure aircraft will continue to expand. The Minneapolis-St Paul area has a strong history of promoting aviation and has an excellent system of general aviation airports that are conveniently located to the growing number of users. • At Anoka County-Blaine Airport, future increases in activity will primarily consist of relatively small single-and twin-engine aircraft. Since the Airport functions as a reliever airport for general aviation traffic that may otherwise use Minneapolis-St. Paul International (MSP), one of its primary functions is to serve as an alternate for small private business and pleasure aircraft. This frees up MSP for commercial aircraft. While no commercial aircraft are projected to operate at Anoka County-Blaine, the number of small business jet aircraft operating at the Airport is expected to increase somewhat. Still, business jets will only account for approximately one percent of all operations at the Airport. Between 1996 and 2015,the total number of operations for all aircraft at Anoka County-Blaine is expected to increase from approximately 192,600 to almost 272,300, and the number of based aircraft is projected to increase to approximately 550. C. Capacity and Facility Requirements The results of the airfield capacity analysis indicate that the Airport does not have adequate capacity to efficiently and conveniently accommodate projected operational demand. The first step in providing additional capacity was the completion of the ATCT,which became operational in October, 1996. A towered airport with a primary and a crosswind runway typically has the capacity to accommodate approximately 230,000 annual operations. The ATCT, therefore, provided an approximate 15 percent increase to Anoka County-Blaine Airport annual operational capacity. While the ATCT improves capacity throughout the mid-term of the 20-year planning period, by the end of the planning period, additional capacity enhancements will be required if the Airport is to continue to meet demand. With the addition of a parallel runway(s),the ability of the airport to accommodate aircraft(annual operating capacity)could be increased to approximately 355,000 operations. This would provide more than enough airside capacity to meet the projected number of operations (272,300)during the planning period. The Airport should be designed to accommodate critical aircraft with an airport reference code(ARC)of B-II (approach speed of less than 121 knots and a wingspan of less than 79 feet). The critical aircraft is the most demanding aircraft, or type of aircraft, expected to perform 500 or more operations per year. Aircraft included in this design category include , • turboprop aircraft such as the Beechcraft King Air and business jets such as the Citation IL Major facility recommendations include extending Runway 8R/26L to• 5,000 feet and 10 The Airport Technology&Planning Group,lac. (Afrrech) 2 MAY-29-1997 15 54 METRO. AIRPORT COMM. 612 726 5296 P.09/12 Anoka County-Blaine Airport • Lang-Term Comprehensive Plan Update May 1997 110 establishing a precision approach with visibility minimums of less than 3/4 mile to Runway 26L. Extending Runway 8R/26L to 5,000 feet and the addition of a precision approach will increase the size of this runway's MnDOT and FAA protection zones. The FAA protection • zones and all but the southern-most corners of MnDOT Zone A will still be located on Airport property. There are several benefits that wiII result from the expansion of Runway 8R/26L. Since the prevailing winds are typically from the northwest, the Airport can accommodate arrivals .from either the east or the south and departures to the north or the west under typical . conditions. With an east-west runway of a comparable Iength to Runway 17L/35R,pilots, especially those operating more demanding business aircraft, would have two arrival/departure options. With the support of the ATCT,the Airport could be operated in a balanced manner, dividing operations between the extended.east-west runway and the north-south runway. The ATCT has indicated almost all demanding business aircraft currently request Runway 17/35 due to its longer length. A 5,000-foot long east-west runway would allow the ATCT to safely direct jet aircraft to depart to the west and initiate • their turn prior to Highway 65,thereby overflying industrial rather than residential property. With runways of equal length, additional noise abatement procedures can be developed, especially with the presence of the ATCT which provides more exact arrival and departure procedures. For example, "split shifts"can be implemented when wind conditions allow. This concept divides the day into several segments of north-south and east-west flow. Again, with two runways that are approximately equal in length,operational or safety benefits are • generally equal between the two runways,assuming favorable wind conditions. The ultimate construction of two parallel runways should be considered to support balanced operations. A north-south parallel runway(Runway 17R/35L) should be constructed to a length of 4,855 feet This proposed runway should be constructed with a runway centerline to runway centerline separation of 700 feet. The existing north-south runway (Runway I7L/35R) should be maintained at a length of 3,500 feet, when Runway 17R/35L is . • completed. A 3,500 foot long east-west parallel runway with the same separation standards, should also be considered. The ultimate phasing of the crosswind runways will depend on • the availability of funding and the outcome of an environmental assessment. Parallel taxiways should also be constructed for the proposed runways. New north-south taxiways should be built equi-distance between the parallel runways and also to the west of Runway 17R/35L. All taxiways should be constructed to a width of 40 feet All FAA object free areas(OFA),runway safety areas(RSA),and runway protection zones (RPZ), and the MnDOT clear zones,are all located on airport property. I • The Alrport Technology A Planning Group,Inc. (AlrTech) 3 MAY-29-1997 15 54 METRO. AIRPORT COMM. 612 726 5296 P.10/12 • Anoka County-Blaine Airport Lang-Term Comprehensive Plan Update May 1997 A precision approach is currently being pursued for Runway 26L. A precision approach, in • conjunction with a 5,000-foot long runway,will allow the ATCT to direct business aircraft to Runway 8R/26L, thus supporting the balanced east-west/north-south use concept. Considering the FAA's ongoing GPS approach program, it is likely that stand alone GPS approaches will be the standard in the next few years. Stand alone nonprecision GPS .approaches to Runways 17R should also be considered. It should be noted that there are a number of towers located in the area that may impact the development of new approaches. A radar slaved to MSP's ASR-9 system is also recommended. Anoka County-Blaine Airport currently has an estimated 720,000 square feet of hangar space. Demand for a minimum of 215,000 square feet of additional hangar space is anticipated during the planning period to accommodate additional based aircraft. Once the Western building area,which is currently being implemented,is developed,an expansion of the Eastern building area and a new Northernwestern building area (located in the northwestern quadrant of the airport)should be considered.The Airport-has an adequate land envelope to accommodate future development needs. D. Environmental Review The Environmental Review chapter focused on noise and water quality issues. While the 55 DNL noise contour will increase in size as the number of aircraft operations increase, it is expected to remain almost entirely on Airport property throughout the planning period. The opening of the ATCT will allow MAC to more effectively regulate its noise abatement plan for the Airport. The noise abatement plan directs the majority of the traffic over the least densely populated areas surrounding the Airport. By balancing operations (assuming Runway 8R/26L is extended to 5,000 feet and parallel runways are constructed),the number of overflights in any particular area can be more effectively regulated by the ATCT. • A Water Management Plan was recently developed for the Airport. No major water quality issues were identified. On-airport wetlands will impact the future development of the Airport. While water quality and wetland information is summarized in Chapter Four, interested parties should refer to the Water Management Plan for specific details. All on- Airport development must meet all Federal, State, and local water quality guidelines. An environmental assessment would be required prior to the construction of a new runway or other major project. MAC staff and legal council are in the process of developing a comprehensive environmental management program for its tenants. This program would identify regulatory deficiencies of MAC tenants at the Airport with regard to existing environmental regulations. Typical compliance checks would include hazardous waste generation,hazardous materials storage, • The Airport TechnoloV&Planning Group,Inc.(AirTech) 4 MAY-29-1997 15 55 METRO. AIRPORT COMM. 612 726 5296 P.11/12 Anoka County-Blaine Airport • Long-Term Comprehensive Phan Update May 1997 • storage tanks, wells, septic systems, stormwater runoff, fuel spills, and air emissions. In addition, MAC is in the process of developing a Reliever Airport Sewer and Water Utility Master Plan. This information, together with the existing Water Management Plan, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, and the Spill Prevention Control, and Countermeasures Plan will provide adequate environmental documentation necessary for the Airport. • • • I The Airport Technology&Planning Group,Inc. (AtrTeeh) S MAY-29-1997 15 55 METRO. AIRPORT COMM. 612 726 5296 P.12/12 ' • h • is ...I• b • 1 i i 1 it aoi '• - . T I a "' •. j ? W a \ z x I ++ a s ``� 0 Z i • � s. o r.� re ... r,..u.u� •' K t 1a' 30 � < < W � f0 1 . - - - i 1 137•011, -• 1 EL VI 44C • 3 O a•. a I j ZZ �� W z Li * x < f t -5 in .4 ag t • • • Z m W lal _o p 1 1.1 ea L W it Cg O 1 • 4.1.1 .111.1111.6 I 1 t •s .'e w1 c: t r a • �W• CI �� ' W .1 , . t :du,. 1,:,.11. ! • • z g °u- dal 1 a L in' :1111 NV si - _ i? v . 1 r. n i I 1 1 _.._.._ ._ Z. ' 131 Ii ' If!'4 'r- ' / i Sm• N ' j�rG lej 0 0 0 . , o . 1: PI ial13008•••--... Q • � . as/ 0 °C Q o 9 Q , ; r I 5. • - .Q Q r.. - - • � ii r ,!• l ma W 5 iki s2 aS • • • r <: 3 O r� � w4 '— �� • TOTAL P.12 Itc+rr A-8 • Livable Communities Demonstration Account of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund 1997 Funding Application Guide BuildtLirvg 1Ml(odellss for Lifecycle Co>>nnrm rug>nl i rtrress 1 CONTENTS 1997 Funding Cycle Schedule Summary of Program Purpose, Funding Availability, Eligible Applicants and Process Guidelines and Criteria Project Summary Form Application Format S i 1 i i • Livable Communites Demonstration Account of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund Summary of Program Purpose, Funding Availabilaity,. Eligible Applicants and Process 1997 PURPOSE: The Metropolitan Livable Communities Act(Minnesota Statutes 473.25) authorizes the Metropolitan Council to provide funds through the Livable Communities Demonstration Account for projects that demonstrate creative and innovative models of compact, efficient development by linking land uses and systems--mixed-use and mixed-income housing, transit, employment, commercial, community institutions, public spaces. AMOUNT OF FUNDING: $4.1 million is available in one 1997 funding cycle. The Council is authorized to award grants or loans. ELIGIBLE RECIPIENTS: Statutory or home rule charter cities that are participating in the Local Housing Incentives Program established by the Livable Communities Act, or metropolitan counties for projects in eligible cities. • APPLICATION PROCESS: Applicants are required to participate in one of two application workshops to be held on June 4 and 6, 1997(see flyer). Workshop presenters will review the objectives of the program and discuss ways to apply the program's objectives and principles to projects, using examples from the Twin Cities region and other U.S. locations. PROJECT SUJMMARIES (two pages in length) are due on June 20. Summaries will be reviewed by the Livable Communities Advisory Committee, staff from the Design Center for American Urban Landscape, University of Minnesota: and Council staff. Comments will be forwarded to sponsors to assist them in preparing applications. APPLICATION DEADLINE The original and two copies of each application are due in the Metropolitan Council offices (Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul 55101)by 5:00 PM on August 8, 1997. The Livable Communities Advisory Committee will evaluate projects and make funding recommendations to the Metropolitan Council. The committee has 15 members with expertise in local and county government, development and redevelopment, urban planning and design, transportation, finance and lending, and private foundation work. William R. Morrish and staff of the Design Center for American Urban Landscape. University of Minnesota. will assist the committee by providing technical assistance to a selected group of candidate projects to refine them as models of livable, compact development. 11110 AWARD DATE: December 11, 1997 QUESTIONS? Contact Joanne Barron, PH 602-1385, FAX 602-1404 • Livable Communities Demonstration Account of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund Program Guidelines and Criteria WHAT IS A LIVABLE COMMUNITY? Livable communities are oriented toward a transit- and pedestrian-friendly environment in neighborhoods with a mix of uses essential to daily life of the residents including housing, workplaces, shops,parks and civic uses. In accomplishing these things, livable communities foster a sense of place and community,where interaction and participation in the community can occur. Livable communities provide a variety of housing types and costs to accommodate peoples' life-cycle changes and to suit their changing circumstances. They incorporate higher-density housing that pays attention to building form and scale. In a livable community, land uses are compact and connected, encouraging walking and • transit use. Such areas accommodate both the car and the pedestrian; for example recognizing that people will drive to a destination,but once they are there,they can walk or take transit. PROGRAM PURPOSE AND QUALIFYING CRITERIA The Livable Communities Act specifies that demonstration projects must do one or more of the following: • Provide access to a variety of transportation systems: transit,bicycles,pedestrian,auto; • Link affordable housing with employment growth; • Intensify new and existing land use; • Provide mixed-income housing; • Encourage public infrastructure that - connects urban and suburban communities, -attracts private sector investment, or -provides employment opportunities to residents. • 1 PRIORITIES Priority will be given to projects that: • • Contain innovative and creative design,policy or regulatory elements that set them apart from typical development practices; • Are replicable in the region, entirely or in part. Replicable elements can be models or processes; • Use innovative partnerships among government,private for-profit, and nonprofit sectors,including private leverage; • Implement the Regional Blueprint's Regional Growth Strategy. EXAMPLES OF PROJECTS TO FIT THE PROGRAM'S PRIORITIES Examples of innovative and creative project components: • A mix(rather than in separated areas)of single-family and,townhouses and other attached and multifamily housing, affordable to a wide range of families and individuals. • A combination of uses that provide a mix of jobs, services and housing with transit access. • Application of design concepts(e.g. orientation of buildings to the street and to each other,attention to building form,placement of garages, etc.)that results in developments that use land more efficiently. • A variety of small shops and restaurants on lower levels of buildings with offices or apartments above. • Ways to successfully emphasize pedestrian circulation while also accommodating the auto(e.g. shared parking arrangements, structured parking,pedestrian walkways, etc.) • Redevelopment or infill projects that are linked to their surroundings through similar or compatible scale, architectural features, or other means. • Developments that successfully incorporate or re-introduce public spaces (parks, public squares,plazas) and pedestrian access and circulation. • Incorporation of neighborhood-scale retail uses along established transit routes, enabling transit riders to conduct daily business at the beginning or end of their trip. • Intensification of land uses in nodes along transit corridors, combining employment locations, workplaces,retail and entertainment options. IP The above examples are also examples of components that could be replicated in the region. 2 Other examples of replicable projects: • • Projects that address regulatory barriers in ways that can be used in other cities. • Developments that address circumstances found commonly in the region. Examples of innovative partnerships: Projects that involve local businesses, community institutions and area residents in planning and implementing projects. Projects that involve financial contributions from local for-profit and non-profit businesses and organizations. IMPLEMENTING THE REGIONAL GROWTH STRATEGY The goals of the Livable Communities Demonstration Account and the projects as described above are consistent with objectives of the Regional Blueprint's Regional Growth Strategy. In addition,projects that help to implement the following goals of the regional growth strategy will receive funding priority, including those that: • Increase housing densities in the Urban Area, especially along transit lines. • Increase job creation and economic development in nodes along corridors from • I-494/1-694 Beltway into the region's core. • Enhance existing neighborhoods and activity centers. • Reduce dependence on the automobile by encouraging direct links among housing,jobs and transportation. • Use regional transportation investments to increase transit use and mixed use development. Below are goals related to land use for different policy areas (refer to Growth Strategy Map attached to these guidelines).Many of these goals repeat the goals of the Livable Communities Demonstration Account. In the Urban Area... • Use land with urban services wisely 0 Increase the density and intensity of development 0 Foster efficient,connected land use patterns 0 Allow mixed use developments • Support job creation and economic development in nodes along corridors within and near the I-494/1-694 beltway, especially in concentrations serviceable by transit • Link transit investments and service enhancements to developments that are pedestrian and. transit friendly • Coordinate redevelopment with regional infrastructure investments • Provide a diversity of housing types,prices and locations • Incorporate environmental preservation into the development process 1111 In the Urban Core... • Revitalize and stabilize neighborhoods through physical renewal,job creation,new housing construction and rehabilitation of existing housing 3 0 Accommodate diversity of income groups • Support and increase job and tax base: target public investments to maintain and enhance the vitality of job centers and nodes within the Urban Core • Improve access and mobility 0 Give priority for regional investments to neighborhoods adjacent to the downtowns 0 Increase access to jobs centers and nodes outside the Urban Core to core area residents - In areas split by the MUSA... • Accommodate at least 2/3 of forecasted growth within the existing 2000 MUSA Boundary 0 Use as little land as possible by emphasizing infill&intensification 0 Conserve land through more efficient land use patterns and higher density 0 Use available facility&service capacities as much as possible • Accommodate no more than 1/3 of forecasted growth in 2020 MUSA expansion areas 0 Plan 2020 MUSA consistent with revised Blueprint and systems plans • Focus job growth in concentrations at or inside the I694-I494 beltway and along corridors serviceable by transit • Protect natural resources consistent with state and regional standards In Rural Growth Centers... • Focus growth in rural cities with central sewer service rather than on scattered sites in permanently agricultural or rural areas 0 Grow contiguously,in stages 0 Function self-sufficiently with a balance of jobs,housing, and shopping 0 Pay for services locally as growth occurs(schools, sewers,roads,water, stormwater . drainage,...) To implement the regional growth strategy,a goal of the demonstration program is to fund projects that further the regional strategy goals, during funding years 1997 through 1999,as follows: Urban Core One or more proposals Urban Area One or more proposals in developing locations. One or more proposals in redevelopment or infill locations. Rural Centers One or more proposals that demonstrate contiguous development that contributes to community self-sufficiency. CATEGORIES AND SELECTION GUIDELINES Project Categories are: • Projects Located Within the Urban Core • • Projects located in a developing location(previously undeveloped land)in the Urban Area. 4 • Projects located on a infill site or a redevelopment area(previously developed with some • type of urban land use) in the Urban Area. • Projects located in Rural Centers. The Metropolitan Council may make awards in all of the above categories, or to one or more projects in some of the categories. Projects in developing locations are especially encouraged because no project in a developing location has yet been awarded a grant from the Livable Communities Demonstration Account in the first two (1996) funding cycles. It is the prerogative of the Livable Communities Advisory Committee and the Metropolitan Council to determine the number and amount of awards. The Advisory Committee and Council may award less than the total available amount of$4.1 million. ELIGIBLE USES OF LOAN AND GRANT FUNDS Two objectives of the Demonstration Program are: 1. To fund project components that directly contribute to completion of a built or finished project. 2. To fund project components or linkages that reflect the goals and principles of the program and set the project apart from typical development in the region. • Funds may be used for project and site planning costs, design and construction costs. Grant funds are intended to be used for"hard costs"rather than"soft costs"such as: administrative overhead; activities prior to the start of the grant project; travel expenses; legal fees;permits, licenses or authorization fees; costs associated with preparing other grant proposals; operating expenses; comprehensive planning costs; and prorated lease and salary costs. Project planning costs may be eligible if they are necessary to the implementation of a project. In considering whether planning or other costs will be funded, the Livable Communities Advisory Committee will evaluate projects on a case-by-case basis,taking into account the viability of the project, and its confidence that the project will be completed. PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA The Metropolitan Council will use the following criteria to determine whether an applicant will be selected to receive an award under the program: Qualifying Criteria 1. The proposal must meet one or more purposes of the Demonstration Account(see page 1). 2. The proposal must be consistent with the policies of the Metropolitan Council's Regional Blueprint and Regional Growth Strategy. • 3. The project must demonstrate an endorsement from the applicant city; or from the city in which the project is located, if the applicant is a county. 5 Evaluation Criteria(85 possible total points) . Note: The information in italics in this section(on pages 6 and 7) is intended as guidelines,not as specific criteria to be met. l. INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY(0-25 points) a. The extent to which the project provides a compact and connected development pattern. Principle:Make Development Compact • Connect rather than separate uses,to allow for functional relationships between them. • Build mid-to high-density, with attention to the design and relationships of structures to each other. Projects should attempt to achieve overall housing densities of at least 7 units per acre.Applicants:Include the number of existing and planned housing units and jobswithin 1/4 mile of the project, and the number of housing units and jobs per acre. • b. The extent to which the project will provide a mix of,and/or integrate different land uses and systems--housing,transit, employment, commercial and other systems. Principle: Mix Uses • Include shops,workplaces, schools, civic facilities,parks and other public spaces,and a variety of housing types and costs. • Connect uses to transit,providing people with a way to get around other than driving alone. Projects should attempt to achieve a mix of different types of development clustered within 1/4 mile walk or within 40 to 160 acre neighborhoods; housing and neighborhood-scale businesses that are oriented to transit and the pedestrian; a minimum of five types of neighborhood-scale uses plus housing. c. The extent to which the project incorporates pedestrian- oriented design. Principle:Design for People • Locate shops and other uses within walking distance of each other, and • within walking distance of transit. 6 • Design streets for pedestrians,not just cars. Orient businesses and other • structures to the street for pedestrian accessibility, and provideconvenient parking. This creates safe,pleasant walking environments. • Provide places for people to gather--parks and other public open spaces, a central place or neighborhood center that provides a focus for activities. • Use design to make places safer, create amenities and improve livability. Projects should consider pedestrian infrastructure connecting all land uses, with short, direct walking routes that are weather protected and well-lit. In parking lots, consider pedestrian crossings. Projects should consider including roadway infrastructure that emhasizes walking, transit and bicycle travel while accommodating cars. Desirable features include blocks scaled to pedestrian travel;streets that are easy to cross Po foot;or, if streets are wide,pedestrian crossings are accommodated through safe, direct pedestrian routes to the transit stop and to major destinations, with center islands. Projects should attempt to achieve site and building design where building setbacks are short,favoring pedetrian use; and where shared parking is located beside or behind buildings. • Projects should consider including severaIcor of the following elements:Public gathering places,parks and open space,pedestrian-scale lighting, canopies with outdoor retail'or cafes, transit benches or waiting areas, natural and historic features incorporated into the development. Proposals are not expected to demonstrate having met all of the principles. d. Whether and to what extent the proposal has identified regulatory barriers and successfully negotiated workable and innovative solutions. e. The extent to which the project is innovative and creative in ways not addressed elsewhere in the above criteria. 2. REPLICABILITY (0-20 points) To what extent the proposal has key project characteristics that can provide a model for replication in other communities. 3. INNOVATIVE PARTNERSHIPS,COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION(0-20 points) a. Whether and to what extent the proposal will draw in partnerships among government,private,for-profit and non-profit sectors, and will involve local • units of government working cooperatively to implement community development and revitalization strategies (such as a cluster agreement or other cooperative arrangement). 7 • b. To what extent the proposal will leverage private sources of funds. , c. To what extent the proposal will leverage other public sources of funds. d. To what extent the proposal demonstrates a planning process (implemented or proposed)that will help to ensure successful implementation of the project, according to the following principles. Principles: • Use an open process involving residents,property owners, developers, businesspersons,and others with an interest in the future of the subject area. • Employ visual models of planning proposals and alternatives. • Address design issues, and uses design professionals in the process. • Develop specific zoning and planning tools, and mechanisms to ensure plan implementation. 4. BLUEPRINT AND REGIONAL GROWTH STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION (0-20 points) a. The extent which the proposal supports implementation of the priorities . of the Regional Blueprint and Regional Growth Strategy.(See goals listed by policy area on pages 3 and 4). b. To what extent public housing units are provided to implement the settlement agreement in Hollman v.Cisneros(Civil No.4-92-712). LOCAL SUPPORT Applications must include a resolution of support from the local unit of government in which the project is located. See example attached to application format. daccri97.doc • 8 -1 Metro 2040 10 Regi• onal Growth Strategy millUrban Core Urban Area x u I Illustrative 2020 MUSA* Urban Reserve �`°'"" ^'.. to Trey. pY(fMe III Rural Growth Centers Permanent Agricultural Area i t''';'; ',A.;*Y=::',i'.14 r Permanent Rural Area x /V 2000 MUSH Boundary(as of 199 41%1�. � , °', :. ' 2040 Urban Reserve Boundary `� /�/ Municipal Boundaryr \ � �i ^ %:,,,,:Aii I a County Boundary r. nW iwp Ai Major Highways ' ��� t � , * The official 2020 MUSA * s y in ."' will be determined local '"`" e ; 14 - . � •7- irkovernments and the Council k of the 1997-98 . prehensive Planning ,' _ " • '� s • �ti e .. x --..--,6:-.'04,-'4,1°,'.„a: --,--alt 11/ � x < rte. ,...,._,_, Vidliff,Mg21„,,,,,0----:--,f-: ;0..,'...t,,'=";/ogr4-,,'----.. '„': =- -:1,-.” ,.„7":-. ,--' """ ,,,,„.„,„..„.. ...., Tg• ,,:* a.'"" '. a w"' .w E� lfj k '1'S�, 3 ,,_, , ,, ,,.. ,, ___ -- rM � _... , , ,_,,,,,,,,,, , . \.imA{T,y... ;•":-'7'",..... ... - _ �, r4 - t i+1 • wiwreis:; , fidrWrT+p • •IIF r N n ±4 , ".. Metropolitan Council 5 0 5 10 15 Miles Geographic Information Systems December 19, 1996 Livable Communities Demonstration Account • of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund ''.`IBS L IIIILDII NG MODELS FOR LIFECYCLE COMMUNITIES" PROJECT SUMMARY FORM (1997) Completing this project summary form is the first step in the application process for the Livable Communities Demonstration Account. Project summaries will be reviewed by the Livable Communities Advisory Committee. staff of the Design Center for American Urban Landscape and Council staff. Comments will be provided to applicants on their projects to assist them with preparing applications. Note: Applicants must be cities that are participating in the Local Housing Incentives Program established by the Livable Communities Act, or metropolitan counties for projects in eligible cities. Summaries are due by 5 Pill on June 20, 1997 at the Metropolitan Council offices, 230 East 5th Street, St. Paul. MN 55101. You may fax them to Joanne Barron's attention at 602-1404. Summaries will be reviewed during the week of June 23. Comments will be provided to applicants by the end of June. Project summaries must be limited to no more than two pages in length and in the format below. Longer summaries cannot be considered. • 1. Project Name 2. Project Location. Attach location and site map. 4. Project Description. 250 words or less. 5. Special Features. List up to five unique or innovative features, and describe each in fifteen words or less. 6. Status of Proposal (e.g. stage of planning or implementation, approvals granted or requested. financing, other funding received or requested). 25 words or less . 7. Contact Person • Address Phone Fax ��I,uuifrm_,II • Livable Communities Demonstration Account of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund APPLICATION FORMAT 1997 Please compile application and attachments in order listed. Do not staple or bind the application package. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Contact Person Address City State Zip Code Phone FAX 2. LOCATION Describe the location and size of the project area. Include maps identifying the location and the adjacent land uses and development. Include relevant portions of the city's comprehensive plan for the subject area. 3. CATEGORY (Refer to Growth Strategy Map attached to Guidelines and Criteria). The proposal is: located in the Urban Core a redevelopment or infill project located in the Urban Area located in a developing portion of the Urban Area. located in a Rural Growth Center. S 4. HISTORY (Limit to two pages). • Describe the history and background of the project area, such as previous land uses and activities, development or redevelopment history. 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Limit to five pages). Describe the project you are proposing, including concept, nature and scope. Specify the types, quantities, locations and timing or phasing of proposed uses. For proposed housing, include actual or anticipated sales/rent levels, and mechanisms to ensure continued affordability of housing. Describe how the project will provide a mix of or integrate housing, transportation, employment, commercial and other uses. Specify the effects of any public infrastructure investment that is a part of the project. Include drawings or schematics, if available. 6. SPECIAL FEATURES List up to five innovative, creative or distinguishing features. Describe each in ten words or less. • 7. LINKAGES WITHIN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, TO ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOODS AND THE REGION. a. Describe the land use, pedestrian and transit connections within the development or project area. b. Describe the area surrounding the project area, through use of land use data, demographic data or other means. Briefly describe any redevelopment activities in surrounding neighborhoods during the last five years. Include pertinent information on relationships between the area of proposed development and adjacent neighborhoods. c. Describe the connections and relationships with respect to employment and transportation between the project area and the subregion or region. 8. PLANNING PROCESS Describe the planning process for developing the proposal, including the process to date, and future • planning. • 9. PROJECT TEAM Identify the participants on the development and management team, including owner/developer, manager, architect, consultants. Describe the experience of principal participants. 10. PARTNERSHIPS Describe the type and nature of partnerships in the project among government, private, for-profit and non-profit sectors. 11. USE(S) OF DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT FUNDS a. What specific project components are you proposing to fund with a Demonstration Account award? b. Describe the benefits or value to the project that Demonstration Account funds will provide. • 12. FINANCIAL SUMMARIES Please complete Attachments A and B. 13. PROJECT SCHEDULE Please complete Attachment C. Include any important benchmarks, local government approvals, other financing mechanisms applied for, applicable timelines, etc. 14. LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUPPORT Attach a local resolution of support. See example, Attachment D. dacapp97.doc Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) • Application ATTACHMENT A SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION Public Private LCDA Amount Requested 1. Total Project Cost Total Soft Cost Total Hard Cost 2. Are you requesting a loan? or grant? 3. What is the status of financial commitments for this project? 4. When will you need Demonstration Account funds? Icdaappl.ata • 'o n. A 8 • e u 0 coi t To V .0 N u GV L Or 0 V C .34N _ R V 0. -d u 0- u L. .a e u 7.1 u 4- A d 10 a 0 A es J es .. c F s u 0 i s U `n8 a O y Od aU CO , • V zd 2 = a. W, 0 U ', E e 2 W d s d 0 A e `4 aw cdd U " Z °' Z �' a`. 2 u O `e -. U ° o W U co CO O : 3 V w O • 3 = Y 0. LL CO w s a h 3 m F 0 a V u U 0 0. E 0 u U V O C.= ca 74 O V 'v N V > to V 713 n s 3$ • V N• e0 lC S u HI 8 a E5 11 U S 1= ATTACHMENT C PROJECT SCHEDULE TASKS 199_ 199_ 199_ • A M J J A S OND J F H A M J J A S O N D J F K A M J J A S O N D 411) • • ATTACHMENT D RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF , MINNESOTA AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR THE LIVABLE CO S DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM WHEREAS the City of is a participant in the Livable Communities Act's Housing Incentives Program for 1996 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is therefore eligible to make application for funds under the Livable Communities Demonstration Account; and WHEREAS the City has identified a proposed project within the City that meets the Demonstration Account's purpose/s and criteria; and WHEREAS the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and WHEREAS the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the contract agreements; and WHEREAS the City Council of , Minnesota agrees to act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the Demonstration Account application submitted on 1996; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to apply to the Metropolitan Council for this funding on behalf of the City of and to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Mayor Clerk • ia-ays INFORMATION (1NIY . OIN TER MEMO OF F ICE To: Mayor and City Council From: Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Director Subject: CUP for oversized garage for Honkomp Date: May 29, 1997 We have realized that one of our planning cases has exceeded the 60 day limit, and as a result,is deemed approved without being acted upon by City Council. This case is a renewal of a conditional use permit for an oversized garage which has received two previous approvals by both Planning Commission and City Council. The oversized garage is attached to an existing house, and was included as part of the original house design. We apologize for this oversight,which was due to a combination of juggling numerous cases and a very high workload. A brief history is noted below. Because of the nature of this case, we do not regard the"automatic"approval of this case as significant. (We do understand that the fact it occurred is significant and we will remedy the situation.) Background: El) On March 17, 1997, Anthony Honkomp submitted an application for a conditional use permit for a oversized garage(Planning Case No. 479-97). This request had been approved by the Planning Commission and City Council on two previous occasions(April 5, 1995 and January 22, 1996). Construction of the garage was delayed longer than one year from the most recent date of approval,and therefore Mr. Honkomp applied for reapproval. Planning Case No. 479-97 was reviewed by the Planning Commission and recommended for approval on May 7, 1997. The sixty day limit expired on May 16. We should have given written notice to the applicant that the City was extending the 60 day limit for an additional 60 days, as is allowed by the State law. Sending this written notice was overlooked. This case was scheduled to be heard by City Council on June 9, but publication of the notice was missed because of the Memorial Day holiday, and we asked the City Council to set the hearing on June 23. We have now realized that both June 9 and June 23 are beyond the 60 day limit. We have therefore sent a notice to the adjacent property owners that the hearing has been canceled. We are proposing that the resolution of approval, which we had intended to prepare for the City Council meeting on June 23, be signed by the Mayor and the City Clerk-Administrator, and that this resolution be sent to Mr. Honkomp. It includes the same conditions as were in the previous approval from January 22, 1996. A copy of this memorandum will be placed in the case file, and the case file will then be closed. We felt it would be misleading to send the case to City Council for action,because the case has been decided by virtue of the 60 day rule. All of our other active cases are being monitored to avoid this situation. 410 We have not put the Honkomp case on your study session agenda, but I would be glad to answer any questions regarding it at that meeting. N:\DATA\USERS\PAMS\SHAREICTTYCOUN\CC-COR\60DAYLIM.WPD „ . . mau • „ .„„„,„„,....„„„„„„„..„„„,„„,..„....,. : Y ITT-CO i:'�:i:>:�S>}::'.'s::';:;:>'5':>::J:•%i!::+::'.::::�:'�:ii2i;{"::::%i•;:�:;i::�i:Rii:;s:Y:is j::::';:?'`;i`i;::;i::>::::•:C:::�i•?:i';•i�:?���':::':�•.� iii::i•���3•:•::i':: •i���i:::::':::i ':i"':}:f.. :'i:'rii�irj'ii: :••?'i:��i r::{:?:>'?'?::i}i'??:J: :�'::ii{�:��•��'iY>������i>.: !i•:i!ii{:<!<ii>?i4iii:%:ii}!ii%i::isii}:ii-:::i{<i:ir'^:i:-::i'.:i::. ::i�`�:::::::'"I•:;;;::�:iii iiiii iiiiiiiii:2'ilii:':ii:ii iiiii iiiii.:.:...... ...�:::..::� :...::�:::.: :4:iiv.:.:;•:i{i;i:!:5;:::::::::::•i::?:::::is ii>i}iii;i?iiiiiiii-::;•::::.�::.::. i> i `ji•' :.is:i�%: ?;5! 'i::Ri.:::: i..f%.ri ---- '2::i< • 2 y.::.�:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::iiii:??»::)::>:":..:�.:�:.�::•;:.moi.;:-;;-:•::..;:.;!�::::::o: •••:.:w '.::.: :ri.�•?is�ii:::;• i'i'��.'`..jiii::{i%jj'2::i :::?t'::i i::`:i l:ii:::i::ii::'::i:::iy.• •�<::::i:'is<?:: jjijii ?:i?�:iii:;Ci:iii{t;:;:vi:;i!i i::i{?!:;i•.i itiv: ............ 5•� �•:i.::+ii•:Y.i•::ii!+iiii+.ti•::•::-::<i!!•:i:ii-:^:::i!•:ii!i•::?ii::i:i ii:iiiiii:iii:•iiii:iiiiii' The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by staff and appointed commissions,committees and boards. Decisions are based on this information,as well as City policy and practices, input from constituents and a Councilmember's personal judgement. If you have comments, questions or information regarding an item on the agenda,please step forward to be recognized by the Mayor during the "Residents Requests and Comments From the Floor"item on the agenda. Please state your name and address for the record. All comments are appreciated. A copy of all printed materials relating to the agenda item is available for public inspection at the Recording Secretary's Table. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE • 3. ROLL CALL McCarty Stigney Koopmeiners Trude Quick 4. Agenda Additions Item 1: Item 2: Item 3: 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 12, 1997 - City Council Meeting COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 110 6. ACCEPTANCE OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES: Festival Committee Meeting Minutes -April 22, 1997 Cable Committee Meeting Minutes-April 10, 1997 7. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: A. Resolution No. 5125, Resolution of Commendation for Patricia Michna, Volunteer • to the City. B. Resolution No. 5126, Resolution of Commendation for Edward Lentendre, Volunteer to the City. C. Resolution No. 5129, Resolution of Appreciation for the University of Minnesota Design Center for American Urban Landscape. D. Proclamation Declaring June 5, 1997, Western Bank Day. 8. CONSENT AGENDA A. Set a public hearing for 7:05 PM on Monday, June 9, to consider a conditional use permit for an oversized garage at 2908 Ardan Avenue; Planning Case No. 479-97. B. Set a public hearing for 7:10 PM on Monday, June 9, to consider a conditional use permit for an oversized garage at 7150 Knollwood Drive; Planning Case No. 480- 97. C. Set a public hearing for 7:15 PM on Monday, June 9, to consider a conditional use permit for an oversized garage at 7765 Spring Lake Road;Planning Case No. 481- 97. D. Set a public hearing for 7:20 PM on Monday, June 9, to consider a conditional use permit for outdoor sales of produce at Mounds View Square Shopping Center, 2535-2585 Highway 10;Planning Case No. 483-97. E. Approve Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds. F. Approve Step Adjustments for Tim Pittman, Public Works Foreman, and Patrick Toth, Cable TV Technician/Producer. Staff Report No. 97-2107C G. Update on Costs Associated with Airport Issues. Staff Report No. 97- 2108C H. LICENSES FOR APPROVAL: HVAC -Expires 06/30/97 Care Air Conditioning&Heating-Renewal ASPHALT -Expires 06/30/97 Superior Paving Co., Inc. -New • GENERAL (Commercial) -Expires 06/30/97 Home Ala Carte -New Tri-G Service, Inc. -New Y . • COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 9. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR Citizens'comments are encouraged to allow individual citizens to address the Council, as a whole,on a matter of interest or concern to the citizens. The preservation of the Citizens'Comments item on the agenda is important in order to encourage and maintain this information flow. To preserve and protect this valuable communications link a speaker is limited to three(3)minutes. CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None. 11 . COUNCIL BUSINESS: A. Consideration of Resolution No. 5127, Approving a General Concept Plan to Allow Development of Commercial and Residential Uses at 2704-2740 Highway • 10 and 7801 Silver Lake Road;Planning Case No. 477-97 Staff Report No. 97- 2109C (Presented by:Pam Sheldon, Director of Community Development) COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: B. Consideration of Ordinance No. 599, an ordinance approving a rezoning from B-2 to Planned Unit Development(PUD) for mixed uses for property located southeast of Highway 10/Silver Lake Road intersection(2704-2740 Highway 10 and 7801 Silver Lake Road);Planning Case No. 477-97 4/5 Vote Required; Staff Report No. 97-2110C (Presented by:Pam Sheldon, Director of Community Development) ROLL CALL VOTE Mayor McCarty Councilmember Trude Councilmember Koopmeiners Councilmember Stigney Councilmember Quick • COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: C. Consideration of Ordinance No. 598, an ordinance approving a rezoning from B-1 • and R-2 to Planned Unit Development(PUD)for commercial uses on the O'Neil property, 2430 Highway 10;Planning Case No. 471-97. 4/5 Vote Required; Staff Report No. 97-2111C (Presented by:Pam Sheldon, Director of Community Development) ROLL CALL VOTE Mayor McCarty Councilmember Trude Councilmember Koopmeiners Councilmember Stigney Councilmember Quick COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: D. Council Authorization of Disposition of Surplus Property. Staff Report No. 97- 2112C (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator) COUNCIL ACTION: A T D • Comments: 12. REPORTS: 1. Report of Councilmembers: Trude: Koopmeiners: Stigney: Quick: 2. Report of Mayor McCarty: 3. Report of Clerk Administrator: 4. Report of Staff: • 5. Report of Attorney: • 5. Report of Attorney: NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION: JUNE 2, 1997 6:00 PM NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: JUNE 9, 1997 7:00 PM ADJOURNMENT: • • • Memo To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator Re: May 27, 1997 City Council Meeting Date: May 23, 1997 First things to start off with is to remind Council that the meeting is Tuesday evening at 7 p.m. because of Memorial Day. Also,the Council and department heads are scheduled for a team building session Wednesday evening starting at 6 p.m. at the Roseville City Hall at County Road C and Lexington. We will have food for that meeting. As for this Monday, here's some comments about some of the agenda items: Special Order of Business: Officer Jerry Johnson will be present with Pat Michna and Ed Letendre for recognition of their volunteer efforts for the community. Officer Johnson has noted his appreciation for their work and the two resolutions are appropriate for recognizing their efforts by the City. Pat currently works for the City as everyone knows, but also contributes with her time as described in the resolution. Mr. Letendre is no stranger to the City Council and in addition to bringing others forward for recognition that may otherwise be unknown, Ed himself has become an • integral part of the lives of several youth in the community and has been active in use and maintenance of the Bel Rae. Both are deserving of this recognition and thanks to Officer Johnson for the attention. Another resolution recognizes the great work that the University of Minnesota Design Center facilitated with staff and community members over the past several weeks. The Council will recall meeting with the Design Center team last Monday on the ring road concept for the community. Having been a late coming participant in the process, I was very impressed with the thoughtful approach taken by the Center and the recognition that the community's values hold the key to any meaningful success of a plan. Their assistance in bringing to light something we may otherwise not have seen should be appreciated, and hopefully their continuing involvement can be forthcoming. The proclamation for Western Bank is also deserving as they will be proclaimed business of the year by the Chamber of Commerce. That is supposed to be a secret for now though everyone seems to know it. Consent Agenda: While most of the consent items are for the setting of public hearings, I had asked Bruce to put together a short summary of the costs associated with the MAC effort. Often the nature of such efforts makes it difficult to foresee the costs, and this report is an attempt to show that. Council Business: Item D -Authorization of Disposition of Surplus Property: I am asking for a Council motion to authorize staff to dispose of the surplus property outlined in the memo from ! Mary Saarion on items from the Bel Rae. The Council will recall briefly discussing establishing an administrative policy for conducting the disposition of surplus property and that is attached. Being an administrative policy, it does not need Council approval, but it will set the guidelines for111 surplusing. We have had a general clean up at City Hall and more requests for authorization may be forthcoming. It is a requirement that the Council approve getting rid of surplus items, hence the request. In other business, I had been working towards having the Community Ed and VB Digs leases ready for this meeting, but they are not ready. With Community need to be worked out. Because we cannot complete construction for their build out b this fall,g s theythat may not be able to take occupancy until a later date that jives with their school scheduling. I need to discuss this more with the architect but I think everything will be workable,just not ready for this meeting. Bob Long and VB Digs are working out some final provisions but that agreement too will not be ready for Tuesday. That's it for Tuesday's meeting. Have a great holiday weekend! 9 • • Page 1 April 28, 1997 Mounds View City CouncilAPPROVED PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA Regular Meeting April 28, 1997 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View,MN 55112 ********************************************************************************** CALL TO ORDER The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:00 p.m.on April 28, 1997. . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor McCarty,Council members Trude, Quick,Koopmeiners and Stigney ALSO PRESENT: Chuck Whiting,Clerk Administrator Cathy Bennett,EDA Director Bruce Kessel,Finance Director Pam Sheldon, Community Development Director Jim Ericson,Planning Associate Bob Long,City Attorney ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA: Mr.Whiting stated he would like to give a brief update on the Anoka County Airport status. He noted that he has had discussions with Representative Evans regarding the city's frustrations with the Metropolitan Airport Commission and their development of a Comprehensive Plan. The City provided input and Public Hearings were to be held in February or March by MAC. Those hearings have not been held yet. Two weeks ago,the Council met with a representative of MAC and since then the council has been checking to see what can be done legislatively. Some legislation was proposed and was approved last week. Mr.Bob Long provided details on the amendment which basically states that the Metropolitan Airports Commission shall not expend any public funds for planning or construction of capital improvements at the Anoka/Blaine Airport that will in any way conflict with the July 28, 1986 court order. This is a house bill and • the senate version does not contain the language so when it goes to the conference committee,the goal will be to keep the language in the house bill. Page April 28, 1997 i Mounds View City Council Mayor McCarty explained that the concern is that the Comprehensive Plan update for the airport(from the city's view)is in conflict with the 1986 Court Order that included some protection for the City of Mounds View. He noted that residents will be kept informed of the progress. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 14,1997-City Council Meeting: MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Tnrde to Approve the Minutes of the April 14, 1997 City Council meeting as presented. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried ACCEPTANCE OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes-March 19,1997,Festival Committee Meeting Minutes-April 8,1997,Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes-November 21,1996,January 21,1997, February 20,1997 and March 27,1997. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to accept the Advisory Commission Minutes as presented. • VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: Resolution No. 5109,Proclaiming May 6,1997 as"Arbor Day". Mr.Whiting read Resolution 5109. CONSENT AGENDA: Mayor McCarty asked if there were any Council Members wishing to have any items removed from the Consent Agenda. He requested that Items 8(B)and 8(C)be removed from the Consent Agenda. MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Koopmeiners to approve the Consent Agenda,AS AMENDED. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty explained that Items 8(B&C)were amendments to the Fire Protection Services Contract and approving a Letter of Understanding regarding the Joint Powers Agreement. He wondered if action is actually needed by the City Council on this issue. Mr.Nyle Zikmund,Fire Chief,explained that this decision could be made by the Council,however he felt the Council may want to approve the amendments it would bring the assets into the city's possession at the pro rata share. Mayor McCarty stated he is somewhat concerned about bringing MAC into the Fire Services Contracts in a • more direct way than they have been in the past. He would be willing to set the items before the Council aside • r, r--) Page3 U L L) S April 28, 1997 Mounds View City Council and allow Chief Zikmund to make the decision which he believes is well within the JPA and our current service contract. He is hesitant to do anything with MAC until they come and talk to Mounds View about the ramifications of their current Comprehensive Plan Update. Attorney Long stated he would like to delay approval of those items until the next council meeting as well. He believes there is some language in the Joint Powers Agreement as far as coverage for the airport. Additionally,if the city is going to enter into a contract to receive a truck,they will likely need council authorization. Chief Zikmund stated his concern that council delays could result in delays in delivery of a new truck until next June or July. A discussion followed. Mr.Long noted that the Council could pass a motion authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to execute the appropriate amendment language to the Joint Powers Agreement, and the Letter of Understanding,subject to review. MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Trude to Authorize the Mayor and the City Administrator to execute the appropriate amendment language to the Joint Powers Agreement and the Letter of Understanding,subject to review. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried • RESIDENTS REOUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: Mayor McCarty noted that this is the period of time for residents to address the Council with comments or concerns on items that are not on the Agenda. Leona Lodmill,2349 Laport Drive,stated she had received a letter from the City of Mounds View in regard to the conditions of her property. City staff took pictures of her backyard(which is surrounded by a privacy fence)without her consent and she does not feel they have the right to do so. She feels she is being stalked. She explained that many of the conditions do exist,including the brush pile,and the tires. The motor home is also in the back yard,however she was told that she did not need to license it if it was parked there. They had a fire on the property and they are attempting to clean things out as they are able,however both her and her husband have health problems. She noted that the conditions are not visible to the neighbors as they are protected by a privacy fence. Mayor McCarty assured Ms.Lodmill that she was not being stalked. He explained that the City of Mounds View has ordinances in Mounds View regarding Nuisance Codes and those ordinances are merely being enforced under the law. Attorney Long explained that under the City's Nuisance Code and under the State Statutes,there is authority for cities to inspect and define public nuisances. It is not a constitutional issue for the city to be enforce it as long as they follow the procedures set forth in the ordinance. Mayor McCarty stated he would ask that an officer be sent out to meet with Ms.Lodmill to go through the order to sort out what she feels are deficiencies in the order. After this is completed,the city will proceed as necessary. TIM 71 ems -sm� ,A •1. � Page 4 • April 28, 1997 Mounds View City Council Bill Werner,2765 Sherwood Road,asked about the status of the Bel Rae. He asked if a report has been obtained from the architect as to the structural and environmental status of the building. He is concerned that the architect has an interest in the building and will basically tell the council what he feels they want to hear. He feels the city should obtain a detailed report including costs,etc.and that the city should hold them accountable to those cost estimates. Mayor McCarty explained that the costs are dependent upon market costs and therefore,very difficult to predict. The architects can only estimate what they think the costs will be. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No.599,an Ordinance Approving a Rezoning from B- 2 to Planned Unit Development(PUD)for commercial uses for property located southeast of the Highway 10/Silver Lake Road intersection(2704-2740 Highway 10 and 7801 Silver Lake Road). Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7:40 p.m. Ms.Pam Sheldon,Community Development Director,provided a brief overview of the project. She noted that the action before council would be for a rezoning. This would be the public hearing for the rezoning,and if the council wished,they could approve the first reading of the ordinance. The second reading would take • place at the next council meeting. Ms. Sheldon outlined the Planned Unit Development process that is required. She noted that the application is at a general concept plan stage and that this step allows the applicant to get a reading from the council and the community on whether there is agreement that this type of development should go forward,in general terms,before the applicant spends a lot of investment in engineering drawings and more detailed planning. This gives the community a chance to give input on the types of uses and their approximate arrangement. She noted that she had outlined three different options for the council to review. These included: 1) that the Council conduct the Public Hearing,close the hearing and proceed to introduce the Ordinance for a first reading with an exhibit that would be attached to the ordinance that would have a detailed list of rules about what will happen at the next stage; 2) that the hearing be conducted,and continue it at another time,asking the applicant to get information on the wetland boundaries,the drainage design,whether the underground parking is feasible and do some additional design work before the first reading of the ordinance(which could be held at the first council meeting in June); 3) that the council deny the request and tell the applicant that they can re-apply when they get the additional information. Ms. Sheldon proceeded to outline areas of the ordinance including Exhibit 1 which lays out the rules the development would need to go by at the development stage and when it is actually constructed. Mr.Jim Ericson,Planning Associate,went through the discussion topics related to the development including the consistency with the Comprehensive Plan,the Highway 10-Area 9 Study,the land uses, the tax impact of the project,the overall project design,access and on-site circulation,traffic study,the drainage plan,natural features and open space,encroachment into the Wetland Buffer,drainage and utility easements,parking,trash disposal, snow storage,Site Improvement Agreement,and the effect on abutting properties. • Page 5 APPRI' VED 28, 1997 • April Mounds View City Council Thomas Budzynski, TJB Homes,2704 Highway 10,stated in 1987 he built his business and in the process, had water brought to his property from Silver Lake Road. At that time,there were property owners between himself and Silver Lake Road who were unhappy about having to pay for their share of the water. To avoid the time involved in a Special Assessment Hearing,he assumed the cost himself,however he was told by the City Administrator said that anytime anyone would hook up to that water line,the city would insure that he would be reimbursed for the cost of putting the water line in. (He believes the cost was approximately$6,300 per property.) He wanted to make sure that the city was aware of the situation and wants to be sure that he is reimbursed for that expense if the development proceeds as proposed. Mr.Whiting noted that this is not a standard way of completing a public improvement. Mayor McCarty stated the council would receive his comments as a part of the Public Hearing and would have staff investigate further. George Winikky,2732-2740 Highway 10,stated in 1987 he talked with city staff about this very issue. He was left with a compelling feeling that he would have to pay for the cost of the water line if he hooked up to it. Mike Black,of Royal Oaks Realty,a representative of the development team was present and introduced all parties involved in the development project. He stated they understand that in the council's consideration of • the PUD Concept Plan,the city is not locking into any specific detailed plan and noted that more detail will be done at the development stage. He would like to request that the City Council consider the first option Ms. Sheldon outlined. He stated they would work diligently on addressing the issues of concerns expressed by the city to bring forth a project that the city would be proud of Mayor McCarty asked if they could respond to all of the city's concerns by May 18th if the council were to adopt Option#1. Mr.Black stated he believed this could be done. Dan Moon,6929 Pleasant View Drive,stated he is not sure that this plan would fit into the future plans for Highway 10. He has some concern with the proposed gas station. He would much rather see a business park development than a development whose occupants would provide only minimum wage jobs. With no further comments,Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 8:26 p.m. COUNCIL BUSINESS: D. Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No.599,an Ordinance Approving a Rezoning from B-2 to Planned Unit Development(PUD)for commercial uses for property located southeast of Highway 10/Silver Lake Road intersection(2704-2740 Highway 10 and 7801 Silver Lake Road). Council member Trude asked if a Wetland Delineation has been done on the property. Mr.Black noted that two Wetland Delineation's have been done,the most recent was done in 1992. However a third delineation could be done as a part of the development stage. Council member Trude asked if they have looked at the 100 year water mark for the proposed underground parking facility. Mr.Black stated this has been looked at in a very general way and that it would be looked at • more thoroughly at the development stage. Page 6 Apri7 - 'Y April 28, 1997 L. • Mounds View City Council Mayor McCarty reminded residents that the Planned Unit Development is a cooperative effort and that the city cannot demand anything,it is merely a negotiation process. He suggested that Options#1 and#2 be combined, striking the first sentence in Option#2,and including the remainder of Option#2,thereby approving the first reading of the ordinance and scheduling the second reading when every one is ready. He stated he would like to formalize the"laundry list"and incorporate it Ander a second motion indicating that all of this is to be supplied by the applicant by May 16, 1997. Council member Stigney felt by approving the R'solution,the council would be approving the general concept of the plan. He has some concerns in doing this. Mr.Long noted that if the council is not satisfied with the developer's response to the issues by the second reading,the council would have the discretion to not approve the ordinance. This would not lock the council in to approving the project. It would only give indication that the council wants them to proceed to the second stage. Council member Stigney stated he would favor Option#3. Council member Trude wondered if this was too intense of a development for the site to provide for storm water run off and adequate parking. Ms. Sheldon noted that after the additional information is obtained,the layout may need to be adjusted downward. The Council could note that they would like to see a revised site layout that reflects this information and adjustment to the density if needed as insurance. 11111 Council member Trude asked if the State Highway Department would give three access points. Ms.Sheldon stated she talked with Bill Keen who saw the proposed plan as an improvement to the existing situation. Ms. Trude stated she would like to keep a very close eye on the traffic flow for the development because she feels this is a very important issue. MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Koopmeiners to Approve the Introduction of Ordinance No.599,an Ordinance Approving a Rezoning from B-2 to Planned Unit Development(PUD)for commercial uses for property located southeast of the Highway 10/Silver Lake Road intersection. ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor McCarty aye Council member Trude aye Council member Koopmeiners aye Council member Stigney nay Council member Quick nay Motion Carried(3-2) MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Trude that the requirements of Options#1 and#2 be combined for further study and that these be accomplished before the second reading,that a traffic study be conducted and that review of the applicant's submittal be completed by a design consultant. Council member Stigney stated he feels perhaps the city is overlooking the U of M Study on the Highway 10 Corridor. He feels that the city should wait to see what they recommend before proceeding with the project. • He has concerns about another car wash/gas station/fast food right across the street from another. Page 7 APPROVED• Apri128, 1997 Mounds View City Council Mayor McCarty stated he has a copies of the Section 9 Study,the Comprehensive Plan and the Highway 10 study. These are the city's dreams,however,his intentions as well as the others in the city,in terms of what they want the community to be,must be weightel with the full knowledge of their constitutional rights in the hands of property owners. The city cannot tell property owners what they are going to put on their property, and they can only negotiate through the PUD process. MOTION by Stigney to amend the previous motion that the results of the Highway 10 U of MN Corridor Study be addressed prior to the second reading ofce No.599. MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF SECOND. Joanne Meyers,Silver Lake Wood Townhomes, ed she had concerns with traffic problems which may occur with those who are attempting to make a left hand turn off of Highway 10 to the gas station during rush hour traffic. She also is concerned about the wetlands. She felt a lot of drainage off the area would affect the wetland. She wondered if zoning change could change the type of traffic in the area. Dan Moon,6929 Pleasant View Drive,asked why Senior Citizen housing was being proposed when there is a large senior complex being constructed on Highway 10 in Spring Lake Park. Mayor McCarty noted that there is a high demand for that type of housing in the area. John Adair of Faegre&Benson,stated he is somewhat concerned about the 120 day limitation. He feels the city should proceed with a second reading and count on the Exhibit 1 as addressing all of the concerns which • must be satisfied before the development stage is approved. Mayor McCarty stated noted that the Ordinance cannot even be enforced until 60 days have passed under the Charter requirements. He views the motion as a double check to see that those concerns are indeed addressed. He also is concerned about the 120 day time limit. Attorney Long noted that what the Council is being asked to do is an alternative method of considering rezoning. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried PUBLIC HEARINGS-continued: First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance No.600,to Consider Amending the Assessment Policy. Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 9:15 p.m. Mike Ulrich,Public Works Director,explained that at the April 7, 1997 City Council Work Session,several revisions were recommended to the assessment policy. He noted that the primary revisions are for the storm sewer assessment and one revision to the assessment for corner industrial and commercial property. He noted that copies of the excerpts of the assessment policy were included in the agenda packets. He proceeded to go through the changes. .. Gregg Lien,Midway Industrial Supply,stated they would be dramatically affected by the Ordinance as it now stands,as they have frontage on Mustang. They do not rely on traffic coming off Mustang,therefore IIIthe frontage would be of no benefit to them. He urged the Council to consider the new amended ordinance. Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 9:24 p.m. Page 8 AVIhUVU April 28, 1997 Mounds View City Council MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Quick to approve Introduction of Ordinance 600,to Consider Amending the Assessment Policy. ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor McCarty aye Y Council member Stigney aye Council member Quick ( aye Council member Koopmeiners aye Council member Trude aye Motion Carried(5-0) Continuation of Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution No.5114,Regarding Modifications of the Development Plan for the Mounds View Economic Development Project and a Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment District No.4. Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 9:25 p.m. Mr.Whiting noted that this was a continuation of the Public Hearing held on April 14, 1997 regarding the Bel Rae TIF District No.4. He introduced Dave Maroney of Community Partners,Inc.who was present to • review the plan with the Council. He went through the five exhibits in the TIF plan. He noted that there is nothing in the document that restricts the term of the district if it is created. This is a proposed redevelopment district and the duration cannot exceed 25 years. Attorney Long noted that Resolution No.5114 approves the TIF plan for District No.4. Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 9:45 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Koopmeiners to Approve Resolution No.5114,Approving Modification of the Project Plan for the Mounds View Economic Development Project and Approving the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No.4. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried COUNCIL BUSINESS: E. Consideration of Resolution No.5111,Supporting Subsidized Housing Units in Mounds View as part of the Proposed Silver Lake Commons Development. F. Consideration of Resolution No.5112 Supporting the Ramsey County's Allocation of Home Funds to MSP Real Estate for the Significant Rehabilitation of 40 Apartment Units located at 2665 Highway 10. Ms.Bennett,EDA Director,briefly reviewed the proposed Silver Lake Commons project. She noted that Resolution 5111 would support the setting aside of subsidized housing units through the Holman Decree for • the proposed Silver Lake Commons. Under this funding,three units would be set aide for existing Mounds View residents who receive rent subsidies. The remaining seven units would be made available to applicants Page9 APPROVELI • April28, 1997 Mounds View City Council from the Minneapolis Public Housing waiting list. The second resolution would be in support of the Ramsey County Home Funds for the rehabilitation portio of this project. If this resolution is not approved,the funds would not be set aside for Mounds View. Ms.Bennett explained that she has discussed other options with MSP in regard to the rental units,however there is concern that it would affect the financial feasibility of the project She has also contacted both a commercial and residential developer to obtain ' opinion of the site. The residential developer felt a housing development would work on the site. Commercial developer,however was concerned about the condition of the existing apartment as well as about access off of Highway 10 or Eastwood Ms.Bennett noted that the Economic Development Commission reviewed the concept for this project and passed a resolution on a 6-0 vote as follows: "General support for MSP Real Estate's concept proposal as it pertains to the rehabilitation of Red Oak Apartments and construction of 26 new townhomes. This support is limited to the concepts and land use but there needs to be further evaluation with regards to the management company and financial analysis. Therefore,not comfortable with a recommendation to support the use of tax increment financing at this time". She noted that the EDC requested that this item be brought back at the May meeting and directed the staff to get some background regarding the management company and the information analyzed by our tax increment • consultant. Ms.Bennett reminded the Council that these resolutions would allow the applicants to enter the annual funding cycle at the public agencies. Ms.Bennett noted an amendment to Resolution No.5111 and 5112. The final paragraph in Resolution 5111 should be changed to read, "NOW BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that between the City of Mounds View,the Mounds View Economic Development Authority and the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority "The final paragraph in Resolution No.5112 should be changed to read,"NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the City of Mounds View,and the Mounds View Economic Development Authority hereby endorse.. .. ". Milo Pinkerton,President of MSP Real Estate explained that the present condition of the apartment complex on the site is one of considerable deferred maintenance,numerous police calls,physical deterioration of the parking lot,etc. The land next to the apartment site has been For Sale for a number of years and he feels part of the problem in selling the land is the poor access to the site. He feels their proposal is of the quality that the neighbors will want in that area. They have obtained resident input in the area and have taken their comments into consideration. Peter Bister,of PBDB Architects in Minneapolis presented a diagram of the proposed project. He provided information in regard to the improvements to the existing building as well as descriptions of the proposed townhomes. He also noted changes that have been made to the parking areas and more landscaping added. A one-half acre play area was also added which borders Eastwood Road and will serve both the apartment buildings and the proposed townhomes. 40 Jeff Hugget of MSP Real Estate discussed the input they had received from residents in the area. He noted that many were initially opposed to the proposal,but after obtaining further information,they were in favor of the ' a Page 10 � F • 410 April28, 1997 Mounds View City Council added improvements. He provided information in regard to the proposed monthly rents for the units,noting that they would range from$509/month for a one bedroom unit to$720/month for a four bedroom unit. Lori DanZeisen,President of DanZeisen Properties,was present to provide information in regard to management of the property. Marie Donahue,2622 Lake Court Drive,stated she is aware that managers and owners of rental units often don't have any rights when it comes to rental selections,etc. She wondered how Ms.DanZeisen would be able to overcome this. Ms.DanZeisen explained that she has a detailed screening process that she goes through and feels that it provides the information necessary in making decisions in the selection process. Council member Stigney asked if the triangular single family property would require rezoning as well. Mr.Pinkerton stated they would propose that the R-1 zoning on that property would be included in the PUD. They are planning to keep the single family home there. Council member Trude asked how many residents they anticipate in the entire development. She wondered how this may impact the schools. • Mr.Pinkerton stated he thinks a majority of the units will be filled by Mounds View residents as there are no other rental townhomes in Mounds View. Arnold Winters,7831 Sunnyside Road stated his property abuts the proposed development on two sides. He would like to see the property improved and is in favor of the proposed development. Mike Coon,7851 Eastwood Road,stated he does not think residents across the street will want to look out to the two-story townhomes. Additionally,he heard that the developers plan to use the single family home as a rental office. This would increase the traffic in the area and affect the property values in the area as well as child safety. Mr.Pinkerton explained that the house will not be a rental office. There would be no access onto Eastwood, therefore he cannot anticipate a traffic increase there. Mike Strauss,7830 Eastwood Rd.,stated he is opposed to tripling the number of people on the block by building high density housing there. Additionally,he wondered why the city couldn't force the landlord of the property to make improvements. Attorney Long explained that in order to force a landlord to make improvements,they would need to determine that the property failed to meet housing code. He noted that approving the resolutions would only preserve options and would allow the city to go forward. They do not obligate the city in any way. Council member Trude stated she does not like the process of proceeding any further without community input. Mayor McCarty stated this does not tie the city into proceeding if they later determine that it is not in the best interests of the community. • Page 11 APPROVED 1110 April 28, 1997 Mounds View City Council MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Quick to Approve Resolution No.5111,Supporting Subsidized Housing Units in Mounds View as part of the Proposed Silver Lake Commons Development. VOTE: 3 ayes 2 nays(Stigy/Trude) Motion Carried MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Quick to approve;Resolution No.5112,Supporting the Ramsey County's Allocation of Home Funds to MSP Real Estate fo#the Significant Rehabilitation of 40 Apartment Units Located at 2665 Highway 10. VOTE: 3 ayes 2 nays(Stigney/Trude) Motion Carried Council member Trude again stated she did not approve of the process and also is opposed to placing a large number of families on a heavily traveled road. A. Discussion Regarding Employee Position Benchmark Service Providers. MOTION by Stigney to continue using PDI as it is less expensive and will achieve the same results. MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF SECOND. • MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to convert to the HAY job evaluation system. Council member Trude stated she had talked with staff in regard to the cost issue and feels that when one considers the staff time in preparing the PDI,it ends up costing more. Council member Stigney stated this is contrary to what he has heard. The basis of cost is$35/person under PDI,versus$175/person under HAY. If the city wants Labor Relations to come in to alleviate spending staff time,they can do so. VOTE: 4 ayes 1 nay(Stigney) Motion Carried B. Introduction of Ordinance No.601,Amending Chapter 502,Subd.502.08 of the Mounds View Municipal Code relating to Intoxicating Liquor license Hearing requirements. Mr.Whiting explained that this is an amendment which would eliminate the hearing requirements for license renewal since there is ample opportunity have heard of problems prior to licensing renewal. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Approve the Introduction of Ordinance No.601,Amending Chapter 502,Subd.502.08 of the Mounds View Municipal Code relating to Intoxicating Liquor License Hearing requirements,and to waive the reading. ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor McCarty aye Council member Koopmeiners aye Council member Quick aye Council member Stigney aye • Council member Trude aye Motion Carried(5-0) ham- TD. r , cf„,:inl Page 12 P P F� c April 28, 1997 • Mounds View City Council C. Consideration of Resolution 5110,Establishing a Municipal State Aid Street. Mike Ulrich explained that in conjunction with the Ramsey County Turnback Program,all turnback roads are eligible for state aid status. Spring Lake Road is scheduled to be turned back in 1997 and Resolution 5110 will establish this designation. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to Approve Resolution NO.5110,Establishing a Municipal State Aid Street. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried G. Opportunity for Hearing and Consideration of Resolution No.5115,a Resolution Authorizing Abatement of Nuisances at 8217 Long Lake Road. Mr.Ericson explained that this property is in violation of the Mounds view Municipal Code pertaining to nuisances. He noted the violations and presented photographs depicting such. MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Koopmeiners to Approve Resolution No.5115,a Resolution Authorizing Abatement of Nuisances at 8217 Long Lake Road. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried • H. Consider motion approving a settlement agreement with TR Systems,LLC for the purchase of accounting software and authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to enter into said agreement for and on behalf of the City. L Consider motion approving a contract with Tauges Redpath to conduct the annual audit for the year ended December 31, 1996. Mr.Whiting explained that these are related to the discussion the City Council had at their recent work session regarding the possibility of pending litigation. Mr.Long explained that the motion in Item H will approve or authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to enter into a settlement agreement. The city would be refunded a portion and a portion would be retained by them to cover their costs of time and material. This is an acceptable arrangement to them. The second motion would be to go out and finish off the 1996 audit with the firm. The second motion is therefore contingent upon the first. MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to Approve the Settlement Agreement with TR Systems. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to approve a contract with Tauges Redpath to conduct the annual audit for the year ended December 31, 1996. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried • REPORTS: 4 ADQQ ,n1U • Page 13 April 28, 1997 Mounds View City Council Report of Council members: Trude: No report. Koopmeiners: No report. Stigney: No report. Quick: No report. Report of Mayor McCarty: Mayor McCarty stated he had a conversation with Diane Kline who is working on Flood Relief activities and donations. She knows of someone who has a truck going to North Dakota every day and they are need of cleaning supplies,personal care items,etc. If any residents wish to contribute items and are unable to get them to the drop off point,they can bring them to City Hall. He also read a letter that the city received from a teacher at Pinewood Elementary who extended their appreciation of DARE officers Tim Brennen,Tom Baumgart and Bob Nelson. Mayor McCarty noted that he has had responses from citizens on the coverage of the warning siren system in . the Northeast part of the city. He asked if staff would check into this. Report of Clerk Administrator: Mr.Whiting stated he has had meetings with the Children's Home Society about their use of the Bel Rae building. The city will need to proceed with specifics on the design criteria prior to reaching an agreement with them. He is talking with them about establishing an escrow account. He also will be meeting with the Community Education Department this week He noted that an agreement was signed by the architect with some minor amendments. Report of Staff: No report Report of Attorney: No report. Mayor McCarty noted that the next Council Work Session will be held on May 5, 1997 at 6:00 p.m. The next Council Meeting is on May 12, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. Mayor McCarty adjourned the meeting at 11:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Tamara D. Saefke Recording Secretary 110 Page 1 4) May 12, 1997 Mounds View City Councilout n1 /7-"n I— 1U VEU 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 8 CTTY OF MOUNDS VIEW 9 RAMSEY COUNTY 10 ,MINNESOTA 11 12 Regular Meeting 13 May 12, 1997 14 Mounds View City Hall. 15 ********************************************************H ******°,k ****MN**5112 16 17 CALL TO ORDER 18 19 The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:00 p.m.on May 12, 1997. 41) 21 21 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 22 23 ROLL CALL 24 25 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor McCarty,Council members Trude, 26 Quick,Koopmeiners and Stigney 27 28 ALSO PRESENT: Chuck Whiting,Clerk Administrator 29 Cathy Bennett,EDA Director 30 Bruce Kessel,Finance Director 31 Pam Sheldon, Community Development Director 32 Jim Ericson,Planning Associate 33 Jennifer Bergman, Housing Inspector 35 34 Bob Long,City Attorney 36 ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA: 37 38 There were no additions to the Agenda. 39 40 SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: 41 42 Resolution No.5120,Commendation to Dorothy Peterson: Mayor McCarty presented Ms.Peterson with 43 a plaque,commending her for her valuable dedication and commitment in her 30 years of service to the City of 44 Mounds View. Ms.Peterson took this opportunity to thank the city staff and council who provided the 45 recognition of her years of service. . 46 47 MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Trude to approve Resolution No.5120,Commendation to 48 Peterson. Dorothy Paget UNs5p° fl"cn May121997Mounds ViewCityCouncil A i cj 1 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 2 3 Proclaiming Irondale High School a Silver Medal State VICA Team: Mayor McCarty explained that the 4 Vocational Industrial Clubs of America(VICA)provides training to technical and business training and helps 5 prepare youngsters for careers. He proceeded to read Resolution No.5124,Resolution of Commendation 6 for the 1997 Irondale High School State VICA Conference Silver Metal Team. 7 8 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve Resolution No. 5124,Resolution of Commendation for 9 the 1997 Irondale High School State VICA Conference Silver Metal Team. 10 11 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 12 13 Proclamation of"National Public Works Week": Mike Ulrich,Director of Public Works gave a brief 14 history of National Public Works Week,which acknowledges Public Works Professionals for their service to 15 the community. The Proclamation was read. Mayor McCarty thanked Mr.Ulrich and the other public works 16 employees for their fine service. 17 18 Announcement of Recognition Award to Jennifer Bergman from New Brighton Crime Free Multi- 19 Housing Program: Ms. Sheldon,Community Development Director,explained that Ms.Bergman was 20 recently presented with an Award,recognizing her for dedicated participation in the New Brighton/Mounds • 21 View Apartment Coalition. Mayor McCarty and the Council thanked Ms.Bergman for her efforts in helping 22 landlords provide decent,safe and affordable housing to residents of Mounds View. 23 24 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 25 26 April 28,1997-City Council Meeting: 27 28 Ms.Trude asked that one correction be made to Page 6,Line 18. The sentence should be changed to read".. 29 .was too intense of a development for the site to provide for storm water run off and adequate 30 parking". 31 32 MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Trude to Approve the Minutes of the April 28, 1997 City Council meeting AS 33 AMENDED. 34 35 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 36 37 ACCEPTANCE OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES: 38 39 There were no Advisory Commission Minutes for consideration. 40 41 CONSENT AGENDA: 42 43 Mayor McCarty asked if there were any Council Members wishing to have any items removed from the 44 Consent Agenda. Council member Stigney requested that Item 8(B)be removed. 45 46 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Quick to approve the Consent Agenda,AS AMENDED. 47 48 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Page3 • pn- 7) • May 12, 1997 A ,y �. Mounds View City Council 1 Council member Stigney stated it is his understanding that the purpose of these services are to help resolve 2 personnel issues which were part of a 1996 survey. He feels that many of the issues have been addressed and 3 that it is now just a matter of communication. He would suggest holding off hiring outside Personnel 4 Consultants until such time as the council has conducted all meetings with the department heads. 5 6 Mayor McCarty stated he feels that the issues of concern are day to day issues that are not covered by the 7 council work sessions and department head meetings. This was a budgeted expense and he feels it is necessary 8 to get city staff working to the best of their ability and with the most efficiency. 9 10 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to approve Item 8(B),Approve Personnel Consultant Services with 11 Leadership of the Twin Cities. 12 13 William Werner,2765 Sherwood Road,stated he does not feel this is a matter of$4,700.,but rather a matter of 14 philosophy of how a staff is run. 15 16 Mayor McCarty stated he feels this is a good operational tool to get staff operating to the best of their ability 17 and to the best advantage of the community. 18 19 VOTE: 3 ayes 2 nays(Stigney/Koopmeiners) Motion Carried 20 21 RESIDENTS REOUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: 22 23 Mayor McCarty noted that this is the period of time for residents to address the Council with comments or 24 concerns on items that are not on the Agenda. There were no questions or comments from the public. 25 26 PUBLIC HEARINGS: 27 28 Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution No.5104,Adopting a Comprehensive Plan 29 Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Mixed Use PUD for Commercial Uses on the O'Neil 30 Property,2430 Highway 10. 31 32 Public Hearing on Ordinance No.598,Approving a Rezoning from B-1 and R-2 Planned Unit 33 Development(PUD),and on Resolution No.5119 Approving a General Concept Plan,to Allow 34 Development of Commercial Uses on the O'Neil Property,2430 Highway 10. 35 36 Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7:43 p.m. 37 38 Ms.Pam Sheldon,Community Development Director,explained that this Public Hearing was to consider a 39 request from Anthony Properties Management,Inc.for an amendment to the Mounds View Comprehensive 40 Plan, rezoning of the property from B-1 and R-2 to Planned Unit Development,and approval of a General 41 Concept Plan of the proposed development at 2430 Highway 10. 42 43 Ms. Sheldon noted that the current Comp Plan designation on the property is medium density residential. The 44 request is to change the designation to two mixed use designations-one for higher density and one for lower 45 density. Ordinance No.598 would approve the rezoning of property at 2430 Highway 10 from B-1 and R-2 ill 46 to Planned Unit Development(PUD)(Mixed Use)to allow for the development of a 16-screen movie theater, 47 three 11,000 square foot office buildings and two restaurant sites. 48 77 7'17 Page 4 , F ' ; .ji ��; ' `) �^ i May 12, 1997 ,. .11 • Mounds View City Council 1 Ms. Sheldon proceeded to summarize the proposed project. She noted those items which staff took into 2 consideration when preparing the amendment request as well as how any items of concern were addressed. 3 4 Ms. Sheldon noted a correction to Page 7 of Resolution No.5104. The third line of Paragraph 3 should be 5 changed to read"Lower intensity uses would include single-family housing(up to three units per acre), 6 and office uses." 7 8 Attorney Bob Long noted that this Resolution would require a 2/3 vote,therefore it would require approval 9 from at least four of the five council members. 10 11 Ms. Sheldon noted that changing the Comprehensive Plan does not approve the proposed project. However, 12 the project will not be able to move forward at all without the amendment to the Comp.Plan. 13 The Planning Commission voted 6-0 in favor of the Comp Plan Amendment. 14 15 Ms. Sheldon noted that consideration criteria for rezoning includes whether or not the rezoning is consistent 16 with the Comprehensive Plan(this would be if the Council approved the amendment to the Comprehensive 17 Plan),whether or not it fits with the surrounding area,and if there is a demonstrated need for the use. She 18 noted that the developer has met with residents in the neighborhood to try to determine what adjustments 19 needed to be made to the plan to provide the best buffer they could between the development and the existing 20 neighborhood. In regard to the demonstrated need for the use,the applicant provided a market study indicating 21 the surrounding theaters in radiuses of 3,5 and seven miles. 22 23 Ms. Sheldon proceeded to provide a summary of the concerns raised by residents in the discussion of the 24 project. These included wetland and wetland buffer,drainage,soils,vegetation and landscaping,traffic,access, 25 parking,market demand,economic benefits,public safety, impact on schools,etc. 26 27 Ms. Charleen Zimmer,of SRF Consulting Group,was present and discussed the specifics of the traffic analysis 28 they conducted for the proposed development. The report they prepared also included estimates of traffic 29 generated by five other land use scenarios for the site. The applicant,the Police Chief and the 30 neighborhood would like to see a full movement intersection at the access point off Highway 10,and SRF and 31 staff would like to proceed working with MNDOT on this issue,but would like to get Council's feelings on the 32 project before pursuing this. 33 34 Council member Trude wondered if the applicant would be open to sharing the costs of putting in a controlled 35 intersection to help defray the costs. Ms. Sheldon stated this would need to discussed with the applicant. 36 37 Council member Stigney stated he would be uncomfortable going ahead on the project without the controlled 38 intersection. Other options were discussed for the intersection in the event that MNDOT 39 would not approve control signals. Council member Trude noted that the Community Center could 40 significantly affect the traffic in the area,especially at times of Volleyball tournaments,etc. Discussion also 41 followed in regard to the possible need for emergency vehicle controls at the intersection. 42 43 Council member Stigney asked if any thought has been given to under grounding the overhead power lines 44 during the redevelopment of the area. Ms. Sheldon stated if overhead power lines are on the proposed site, 45 they would need to underground them. If they are in the public right of way,it may be necessary for the city to 46 examine whether some type of cooperative project could be done in conjunction with this. This could be 47 something that TIF funds could be used for. • 48 Page 5 57 , May 12, 1997 w �`' �� z, ��'� � '+f,, a xs 4n Mounds View City Council 1 Wendell Smith,Real Estate Consultant and Representative for Anthony Properties,presented diagrams of the 2 proposed development,showing the progression that had been made since their first proposal. The changes 3 were largely based on input from the surrounding neighborhood after a number of neighborhood meetings. He 4 provided information on the types of buffering that would be used,the style of the proposed office buildings, 5 etc. He noted that the office buildings would be of a residential type with residential rooflines and windows to 6 provide a nice transition from the residential area to the commercial. 7 8 Mr. Smith noted that the office project has not been marketed yet,and that the marketing will dictate the timing 9 of the completion. The proposed offices are of the type that many desire and he does not feel there will be any 10 problems developing them within the next two years. Fifty percent of the buildings will need to be pre-leased 11 before they are able to obtain financing. 12 13 The developer has already begun preliminary marketing for the restaurant sites,however they do not have the 14 re-zoning approved. Once approval has been granted for the re-zoning,they will work actively to lease the 15 restaurant space. 16 17 David Jahnke,8428 Eastwood Road,stated if the rezoning of the property does not get approved,another 18 developer could come in and comply with the existing zoning and the city would not have much to say about 19 what is developed on the site. He noted that the developers have been receptive to input from neighboring 20 residents and have made changes based on that input. He feels the council needs to seriously consider the 411 21 proposal,or be faced with alternatives that may not be favorable. 22 23 Tom Ernstor,2504 County Road 112,explained that the developer has worked with the people who will be 24 most affected and offered them the option for a buy-out. He,as a resident,would like to see controls put in at 25 the Highway 10 intersection and offered to provide support on behalf of the city to MNDOT for this proposal. 26 27 Resident,2683 Lake Court Circle,stated he is opposed to the development,primarily because of the increase 28 in traffic. He is also concerned about the article printed in last week's paper which indicated that the 29 property is being developed. He feels many people did not attend the Public Hearing as they understood that 30 the project had already been approved. 31 32 Joe Beaten,representing Mrs.O'Neil,explained that under the existing zoning,a developer could construct a 33 approximately 45 townhouse units or duplexes on the proposed office building site. This would create 34 considerably more traffic than the proposed development. 35 36 Russell Nordstrom,2536 W.County Road H-2,stated he has been working with the developers to get a 37 favorable development across from his property. He feels the proposed office buildings will provide a nice 38 transition from residential to business. He would also like to see a signal light at the Highway 10 intersection. 39 He noted that the developers have been good about working with the residents to get their input and all of this 40 has contributed toward changing his opinion of the project. He no longer is opposed. 41 42 With no further input,Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 10:15 p.m. 43 44 Consideration of Resolution No,5104,Adopting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium 45 Density Residential to Mixed Use PUD for Commercial Uses on the O'Neil Property,2430 Highway 10. . 46 47 (Note change to language in Resolution No. 5104,as noted previously.) 48 Page 6 •'Npr .1 y a "1 t� '� ' f May 12, 1997 j Mounds View City Council =ra 1 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Approve Resolution No.5104,Adopting a Comprehensive Plan 2 Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Mixed Use PUD for Commercial Uses on the O'Neil 3 Property,2430 Highway 10. 4 5 ROLL CALL VOTE: 6 7 Mayor McCarty aye 8 Council member Koopmeiners aye 9 Council member Trude aye 10 Council member Stigney aye 11 Council member Quick aye 12 13 Motion Carried(5-0) 14 15 16 COUNCIL BUSINESS: 17 18 A. Consideration of Resolution No.5119,Approving a General Concept Plan for the O'Neil Property 19 to Allow Development of Commercial Uses,2430 Highway 10. 20 •21 Ms. Sheldon noted that this Resolution will indicate the Council's approval of the general layout of the 22 development. This resolution will also approve the stipulations in Exhibit 1. She asked that the following 23 changes be made to Resolution No.5119. The final paragraph should be changed to read as follows: 24 25 NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council does hereby approve the 26 general concept plan for the O'Neil Property prepared by HLM Architects and dated 2/1/97,subject to the 27 stipulations contained in Exhibit 1,and to the requirement that approval be obtained for a development stage 28 plan and final plan as provided in Section 1120.04,Subd.3 and Subd.4 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, 29 and with the following corrections to the general concept plan diagram: 30 31 1. make Parcels A and B as restaurant sites; 32 33 2. remove the driveways of the North and South end of the site on Highway 10; 34 35 3. mark the driveway at the center as right in/right out;and 36 37 4. remove the reference to the pedestrian bridge. 38 39 Mayor McCarty asked that Page 4 of Exhibit 1 of Resolution 5119 be changed as follows: 40 41 11. Wetland;Wetland Buffer Area 42 43 The wetland on the O'Neil Property is protected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources(#171W) 44 and by the City ofMounds View Wetland Zoning District 45 ` 46 MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to Approve Resolution No.5119,Approving a General Concept • 47 Plan for the O'Neil Property to Allow Development of Commercial Uses,2430 Highway 10,AS AMENDED. 48 • rA 77.41 Pagel jam; � y ioMay 12, 1997 ' ,'�' �' , :, !=� Mounds View City Council 1 ROLL CALL VOTE: 2 3 Mayor McCarty aye 4 Council member Koopmeiners aye 5 Council member Stigney aye 6 Council member Quick aye 7 Council member Trude aye 8 9 Motion Carried(5-0) 10 11 B. Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No.598,Approving a Rezoning from B-1 and R-2 to 12 Planned Unit Development(PUD)for Commercial Uses on the O'Neil Property,2430 Highway 10. 13 14 Ms. Sheldon explained that this ordinance will approve the change on the map from R-2 and B-1 to PUD. 15 16 MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Trude to Approve the Introduction of Ordinance No.598,Approving a 17 Rezoning from B-1 and R-2 to Planned Unit Development(PUD)for Commercial Uses on the O'Neil 18 Property,2430 Highway 10,and to waive the reading. 19 20 ROLL CALL VOTE: S21 22 Mayor McCarty aye 23 Council member Quick aye 24 Council member Stigney aye 25 Council member Trude aye 26 Council member Koopmeiners aye 27 28 Motion Carried(5-0) 29 30 Mr. Smith asked if the Council would be willing to pass a resolution authorizing staff to work with the 31 developer and MNDOT to start the necessary process in obtaining a signalized intersection on Highway 10. 32 Mayor McCarty stated he would like to explore some ideas with the Public Works Director and the Council, 33 but noted that they would attempt to get this on the agenda for the next work session. 34 35 PUBLIC HEARINGS: 36 37 Public Hearing on Ordinance No.601,Relating to Intoxicating Liquor Licenses,Amending Title 500, 38 Chapter 502,Subd.502.8 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. 39 40 Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 11:10 p.m. 41 42 Mr.Long,City Attorney,explained that this eliminate the 10-day public notice now required for public 43 hearings on intoxicating liquor licenses. 44 45 Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 11:12 p.m. • 46 47 COUNCIL BUSINESS: 48 I 1 P. Page 8 :4 = + IQ.. -: May 12, 1997 • Mounds View City Council 1 C. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No.601,Relating to Intoxicating Liquor Licenses, 2 Amending Title 500,Chapter 502,Subd.502.8 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. 3 4 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Quick to Approve the Adoption of Ordinance No.601,Relating to Intoxicating 5 Liquor Licenses,Amending Title 500,Chapter 502,Subd. 502.8 of the Mounds View Municipal Code,and to 6 waive the reading. 7 8 ROLL CALL VOTE: 9 10 Mayor McCarty aye 11 Council member Trude aye 12 Council member Koopmeiners aye 13 Council member Stigney aye 14 Council member Quick aye 15 16 Motion Carried(5-0) 17 18 D. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No.600,Amending the Assessment Policy. 19 20 Mr.Ulrich explained that the primary amendment is to the service water management assessment 21 whereby unit costs have been established with maximum limits for service water assessments. A minor • 22 revision was also made to the industrial/commercial corner lot for street assessment. He noted that the 23 following corrections should be made to the ordinance: page 2,item(h),line 10 -remove($400.00 per lot), 24 Line 15-remove($1,200 per acre)and insert.. .unit cost of$1,200.00 per acre. Page 3,line 1 -change to 25 read"multiplied by the unit cost(remove$1,200.00 per acre),insert to a maximum amount.. . 26 27 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Koopmeiners to approve the adoption of Ordinance No.600,Amending the 28 Assessment Policy,and to waive the reading. 29 30 ROLL CALL VOTE: 31 32 Mayor McCarty aye 33 Council member Quick aye 34 Council member Stigney aye 35 Council member Koopmeiners aye 36 Council member Trude aye 37 38 Motion Carried(5-0) 39 40 E. Consideration of Resolution No.518,Approving County Road Turn back(Spring Lake Road). 41 42 Mr.Ulrich explained that this Resolution would establish the jurisdictional change of Spring Lake Road from 43 Ramsey County to the City of Mounds View. Included in the turn back program is the reimbursement of funds 44 from the County for the reconstruction of the driving lanes,amounting to$580,000. 45 46 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to Approve Resolution No.5118,Approving County Road Turn back 1111 47 (Spring Lake Road). 48 r n n1 /c : ; , Page 9 • May 12, 1997 Mounds View City Council 1 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 2 3 F. Consideration of Resolution No.5121,Directing Staff to Proceed on Bel Rae Construction Contract 4 Specifications and Bid Letting of Spending Authorization. 5 6 Mr.Long explained that this resolution will give staff authority to proceed with getting the contract 7 specifications ready,and authorize the expenditure of TIF funds. 8 9 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Koopmeiners to Approve Resolution No.5121,Directing Staff to Proceed on Bel 10 Rae Construction Contract Specifications and Bid Letting of Spending Authorization. 11 12 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 13 14 G. Approval of Resolution No.5122,Children's Home Society Lease Agreement. 15 16 Mr.Whiting explained that this resolution would approve a lease agreement between the City of Mounds View 17 and the Children's Home Society. He noted that their Board will not be meeting to consider this item until later 18 this month,however it will need to be executed prior to the awarding the bid and therefore,council approval is 19 necessary at this time. 20 21 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to Approve Resolution No.5122,Children's Home Society Lease 22 Agreement. 23 24 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 25 26 IL Approval of Resolution No.5123,Construction Manager Agreement for the Bel Rae Project. 27 28 Mr.Long explained that the city would be utilizing a Construction Manager to oversee the construction work at 29 the Bel Rae. This is a standard construction management agreement form. This resolution would give the 30 Mayor and the Clerk Administrator the authority to execute the agreement with Flannery Construction at a rate 31 of 3%. 32 33 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to approve Resolution No.5123,Construction Manager Agreement for 34 the Bel Rae Project. 35 36 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 37 38 REPORTS: 39 40 Report of Council members; 41 42 Trude: No report. 43 44 Koopmeiners: No report. 45 46 Stigney: No report • 47 48 Quick: No report. �yfl\,nHft Page 10 is 4 May 12, 1997 • Mounds View City Council 1 Report of Mayor McCarty: Mayor McCarty noted that DARE posters at City Hall were designed by 2 Pinewood Elementary School students. The students will be graduating from the DARE Program on May 22, 3 1997. 4 5 MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Trude to Approve a Resolution of Congratulations to the DARE Class of 1997 6 at Pinewood Elementary School and Officer Tim Brennen. 7 8 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 9 10 11 Report of Clerk Administrator. Mr.Whiting stated he is working out some final details on the lease 12 agreement with the School District and expects to have those worked out soon. 13 14 Report of Staff: No report 15 16 Report of Attorney: No report 17 18 Mayor McCarty noted that the next Council Work Session will be held on June 2. 1997 at 6:00 p.m. The next 19 Council Meeting is on May 28, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. 20 21 Mayor McCarty adjourned the meeting at 11:28 p.m. • 22 23 Respectfully submitted, 24 25 Tamara D. Saeflce 26 Recording Secretary 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 i • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the claim numbers: 55553 through 55721 in the amount of$ 138,673.12 54981 through 55008 in the amount of$ 234,159.03 through in the amount of$ • through in the amount of$ TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $372,832.15 and has found said claims to be just and correct; It was moved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached list of claims dated 05/28/97 by the vote ayes nayes Mayor Clerk-Administrator • 3E 1 ~ ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW |DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI iO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 11,CIO1 , SHARON 55553 05/28/97 05/28/97 5.00 VENDOR TOTAL 5.00 00 BONA JANET , 55554 05/28/97 05/28/97 10.80 VENDOR TOTAL 10.80 15 JAHNKE, WENDY 55555 05/28/97 05/28/97 12.25 VENDOR TOTAL 12.25 07 JENSEN, JANET 55556 05/28/97 05/28/97 36.00 ' VENDOR TOTAL 36.00 02 GREGORY , NANCY 55557 05/28/97 05/28/97 28.00 VENDOR TOTAL 28.00 10 MCGOVERN, DONNA 55558 05/28/97 05/28/97 7.25 VENDOR TOTAL 7.25 )8 MILLER, GARY 55559 05/28/97 05/28/97 40.00 VENDOR TOTAL 40,00 )1 JOB'S DAUGHTERS 55540 05/28/97 05/28/97 500.00 VENDOR TOTAL 500.00 )4 ET, BECKY 55541 05/28/97 05/28/97 7.25 ~~ VENDOR TOTAL 7.25 )0 ALBRECHT, MICHELLE 55562 05/28/97 . 05/28/97 15.00 VENDOR TOTAL 15.00 DEMARAIS, JEAN 55563 05/28/97 05/28/97 30.00 VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 2 DONOFRIO, JENNIFER 55544 05/28/97 05/28/97 28.00 VENDOR TOTAL 28.00 3 HUSBY , NANCY 55565 05/28/97 05/28/97 28.00 VENDOR TOTAL 28.00 4 KLEIN, SHIRLEY 55566 05/28/97 05/28/97 28.00 VENDOR TOTAL 28.00 5 PERAULT, JAMES 55567 05/28/97 05/28/97 30.00 VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 S PUTZIER, PAM 55548 05y28y97 05/28/97 2.25 VENDOR TOTAL 2.25 7 SNYDER, JEFFEREY 55569 05/28/97 05/28/97 2.25 III VENDOR TOTAL 2.25 O 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER C1O-01 MOUNDS VIEW DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI O VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 08 STORDAHL, VICKIE 55570 05/28/97 05/28/97 40.00 VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 09 VOSS, ANDREA 55 571 05/28/97 05/28/97 2R.00 VENDOR TOTAL .00 10 FOSS CONTRACTING 55572 05/28/97 05/28/97 40.00 VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 11 TODD, TAMMY 55573 05/28/'=x7 05/28/97 28.00 VENDOR TOTAL 28.00 12 K:UBINSKI , WANDA 55574 05/28/97 05/28/97 VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 13 TAFT, JUSTIN 55575 05/28/97 05/28/97 2 .00 VENDOR TOTAL 28.00 14 ROME, KEITH 55576 05/28/97 05/28/97 28.00 VENDOR TOTAL 28.00 5 NAYLOR, JULIE 55577 05/28/97 05/2R/97 2- .00 VENDOR TOTAL : .00 ART 55578 05/28/Q7 04/ 18/.47 5.0: VENDOR TOTAL 5.03 >9 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICE* 55579 05/28/97 2455516 04/26/97 67.42 VENDOR TOTAL 67.42 +5 ACTION PRESS, INC. 55580 05/28/97 2536 05/13/97 387.01 VENDOR TOTAL 387.01 • AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 55581 05/28/97 04/20/97 151 .95 VENDOR TOTAL 151 .95 O AF:ONA CORPORATION 55582 05/28/97 58905 04/11/9793' . 1. VENDOR TOTAL '-'93--'. 1-'. 5 AMER LINEN & APPAREL * 55583 05/28/97 M65410513 05/13/97 188.88 VENDOR TOTAL 183.88 3 AMERICAN OFFICE PRODU* 55584 05/28/97 :308483 04/30/97 210.05 VENDOR TOTAL X10.05 1 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORF.S* 55585 05/28/97 58944 05/28/97 325.00 VENDOR TOTAL .00 O HOR PAPER CO. 55584 05/28/97 101180201 04/30/9775.-62 ' E 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER C10-01 _ MOUNDS VIEW DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI iO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 1 � � 55586 05/28/97 100950101 04/24/97 75.62 VENDOR TOTAL 151 .24 73 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS,* 55587 05/28/97 16087 05/13/97 2524.88 VENDOR TOTAL 2524.88 02 ARIZONA MFG & EMBROID* 55588 05/28/97 263118 05/28/97 461 .77 VENDOR TOTAL 461 .77 00 ASAP SIGNS 55589 05/28y97 46133 05/08/97 34.80 ' VENDOR TOTAL 34.80 50 AUGIE'S, INC. 55590 05/28/97 13377 04/18/97 112.08 55590 05/28/97 13847 04/29/97 86.28 55590 05/28/97 14254 05/06/97 86.28 VENDOR TOTAL 284.64 55 BALLOMATIC, INC 55591 05/28/97 5539 04/29/97 25.56 55591 05/28/97 5478 04/23/97 2(3.62 55591 05/28/97 5251 04/11/97 194.08 VENDOR TOTAL 483.26 E1 BATTERIES PLUS 55592 05/28/97 D20128 05/08/97 5.00 VENDOR TOTAL 5.00 ilkFS, )0 INC 55593 05/28/97BI093152 04y30/97 191 .30 VENDOR TOTAL 191 .30 ` X5 BEISSWENGER'S 55594 05/28/97 270258 ' 04/25y97 35.22 55594 05/28/97 270112 04/25/97 10.64 55594 05y28/97 274356 04/30/97 16.95- 55594 05/28/97 267881 04/22/97 13.87 55594 05/28/97 267212 04/21/97 13.01 55594 05/28/97 265140 04/18/97 1 .05 55594 05/28/97 263365 04/15/97 9.04 55594 05/28/97 274397 04/30/97 19. 15 55594 05/28/97 282555 05/09/97 15. 19 55594 05/28/97 264469 04/17/97 30.60 55594 05/28/97 268730 04/23y97 20.38 55594 05/28/97 269220 04y23/97 30.51 55594 05/28/97 274945 05/01/97 10. 10 55594 05/28/97 272527 04/28/97 38.84 55594 05/28/97 269625 04/24/97 47.87 55594 05/28/97 264543 04/17/97 53.77 55594 05/28/97 263688 04/16/97 86.84 55594 05/28y97 263655 04/16/97 200.90 55594 05/28y97 262303 04/14/97 10.28 55594 05/28/97 293989 05/22/97 36. 17 55594 05/28/97 281766 05y08/97 10.05 55594 05y28/97 279820 05/06/97 12.77 II~ 3E 4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01 ~ MOUNDS VIEW <DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI AO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT I55594 05/28/97 274049 04/30/97 76.65 - VENDOR TOTAL 765.95 )50 BEST BUY CO. , INC. 55598 05/28/97 0110113245 05/02/97 7.74 55598 05/28/97 0110114055 05/15/97 11 .70 55598 05/28/97 8690747 05/13/97 105.38 55598 05/28/97 0110112697 04/23/97 19.57 VENDOR TOTAL 144.41 :00 BOB'S PERSONAL COFFEE* 55599 05/28/97 99667 05/12/97 5.33 ' VENDOR TOTAL 5.33 '82 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 55600 05/28/97 595432 05/01/97 374.45 VENDOR TOTAL 374.45 84 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPOR* 55601 05/28/97 089207 04/30/97 ' 1500.00 VENDOR TOTAL 1500.00 20 BRENNAN, TIM 59602 05/20,/97 05/28/97 3A.99 VENDOR TOTAL 36.99 79 BRIDGESTONE SPORTS (U* 55603 05/28/97 420736 04/10/97 349.56 VENDOR TOTAL 349.56 10DWAY RENTAL EQUIP* 55604 05/28/97 222817 05/01 / 7 584.92 �� 55604 05/28/97 221638 04/16/97 746. 16 VENDOR TOTAL 1331 .08 20 BROCK WHITE COMPANY , * 55605 05/28/97 94559201 05/13/97 1065.00 55605 05/28/97 94516301 04/30/97 3186.53 VENDOR TOTAL 4251 .53 )0 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, * 55606 05/28/97 04/30/97 5680.92 VENDOR TOTAL 5680.92 30 BUMPER TO BUMPER 55607 05/28/97 D54925 04/22/97 8.99 55607 05/28/97 D56399 05/09/97 6. 18 55607 05/28/97 D56383 05/09/97 15. 19 55607 05/28/97 D56235 05/07/97 7.08 55607 05/28/97 D56125 05y06/97 27.40 55607 05/28/97 D54143 05/06/97 8.89 VENDOR TOTAL 73.93 0 BYE, LORI 55608 05/28/97 05/28/97 5.00 VENDOR TOTAL 5.00 `0 CERTIFIED LABORATORIE* 55609 05/28/97 TO-099296 05/07y97 353.90 VENDOR TOTAL 353.90 0FEE-INN OF MINNESO* 55610 05/28/9742931 04/21/97 77.95 ��� GE 5 . ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK � --'' INVOICE INVOICE DI NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 4��1 - 55610 05/28/97 42802 05/06/97 232.65 VENDOR TOTAL 310.60 996 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC 55611 05/28/97 0053444 04/29/97 400.97 VENDOR TOTAL 400.97 }00 COPY SALES, INC. 55612 05/28/97 054297 05/09/97 17.74 55612 05/28/97 054333 05/12/97 913.93 VENDOR TOTAL 931 .67 . )10 CORPORATE EXPRESS 55613 05/28/97 13860252 05/03/97 3.79 VENDOR TOTAL 3.79 %25 COTTENS INC 55614 05/28y97 212736 05/12/97 9.29 55614 05/28/97 211229 05/01/97 5.52 55614 05/28/97 211278 05/01/97 4.61 55614 05y28/97 211196 05/01/97 29.05 55614 05/28/97 209148 04/17/97 20.88 VENDOR TOTAL 69.27 `20 CROWN FENCE & WIRE CO* 55615 05/28/97 6096 05/09/97 740.00 VENDOR TOTAL 740.00 80 CUES, INC. 55616 05/28/97 103898 05/06/97 768.56 ��� 55616 05/28/97 104025 05y07/97 149. 19 ���� VENDOR TOTAL 917.75 00 CURTIS 1000 INC. 55617 05/28/97 11814001 01 05/07/97 575.34 VENDOR TOTAL 575.34 50 DCA, INC. 55618 05/28y97 92209 04/30/97 158. 10 VENDOR TOTAL 158. 10 30 DELBOW, KEVIN 55619 05/28/97 4219 04/07/97 543.55 55619 05/28/97 4243 04/21/97 245.30 VENDOR TOTAL 788.85 37 DEPENDABLE INDOOR AIR* 55620 05/28/97 012070 04/07/97 4614.00 VENDOR TOTAL 4614.00 50 DISH NETWORK 55621 05y28y97 04/27/97 5.34 VENDOR TOTAL 5.34 .5 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 55622 05/28/97 139475 04/22/97 249.00 55622 05/28y97 142853 04/29/97 233.75 55622 05/28/97 145779 05/06y97 181 .50 VENDOR TOTAL 664.25 m0 EDAM SUMMER CONFERENC* 55623 05/28/97 05/28/97 225.00 II� VENDOR TOTAL 225.00 � O 6 ' - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI O iiiDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 75 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY C* 55624 05/28/97 6-065464 04/28/97' 31 .92 VENDOR TOTAL 31 .92 61 ETONIC WORLDWIDE CORP* 55625 05/28/97 0267468 04/08/97 964.26 55625 05y28y97 0268304 04/09/97 55.92 VENDOR TOTAL 1020. 18 75 EVERGREEN LAND SERVIC* 55626 05/28y97 6961 05/02/97 246.00 . VENDOR TOTAL 246.00 38 EXCELSIOR FIRE DEPART* 55627 05/28y97 05/13/97 297.00 ' VENDOR TOTAL 297.00 5 EXECUTONE 55628 05/28/97 96173 05/13/97 489.00 55628 05/28/97 96255 05/15/97 18931 .65 VENDOR TOTAL 19420.65 )4 FINANCE DEPARTMENT--A* 55629 05/28/97 05/28/97 847.00 VENDOR TOTAL 847.00 )0 FOUR BY FOUR SERVICE 55631 05/28/97 107891 05/07/97 30.00 VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 )8 •CKE & SONS SOD, IN* 55632 05/28/97 05/06/97 66. | 5 55632 05/28/97 05/08/97 8.00- 55632 05/28/97 05/16/97 16.00- 55632 05/28/97 05/14/97 132.30 VENDOR TOTAL 174.45 5 FRIENDLY CHEVROLET GE* 55633 05/28/97 105981 05/06/97 46.22 55633 05/28/97 105999 05/06/97 77.53 55633 05/28/97 105982 05/06/97 5.96 VENDOR TOTAL 129.71 O FUEL OIL SERVICE CO. ,* 55634 05/28/97 014805 05/07/97 512.49 VENDOR TOTAL 512.49 O GOLF CAR MIDWEST 55635 05/28/97 970832 05/01/97 134.30 55635 05/28/97 970833 05/01/97 4.47 VENDOR TOTAL 138.77 O GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL* 55636 05/28/97 7040445 04/30/97 213.50 VENDOR TOTAL 213.50 O GOVERNMENT TRAINING S* 55637 05/28/97 05/28/97 35.00 VENDOR TOTAL 35.00 5 W W GRAINGER INC 55638 05/28/97 497-994536-9 04/18/97 28. 12 11 55638 55638 O5/28y97 497-994537-7 04/18/97 28. 12 � GE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01 ' MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE I NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT ~ ���� � 55638 05/28/97 497-991391-2 04/03y97 44.63 55638 05y28/97 497-992963-7 04/11/97 60.71 VENDOR TOTAL 161 .58 575 HANGGI , WILLIAM 55639 05/28/97 05/28/97 15.00 ~ VENDOR TOTAL 15.00 300 THANE HAWKINS POLAR C* 55640 05y28/97 CVCS148045 03/21/97 74. 14 VENDOR TOTAL 74. 14 . 325 HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL* 55641 05/28/97 021462 05y07/97 123.30 55641 05y28/97 020219 04/23/97 327.50 55641 05/28/97 171744 04y14/97 380.58 55641 05/28/97 271987 04/19y97 228.88 55641 05/28/97 010771 05/01/97 69.86 VENDOR TOTAL 1130. 12 :47 HORNUNG'S PRO GOLF SA* 55642 05/28/97 892500 03/31/97 435.42 55642 05/28/97 894324 04/08/97 156.06 55642 05/28/97 905418 05/08/97 686.22 55642 05y28/97 904062 05/05/97 3415.00 VENDOR TOTAL 4692.70 00 HUGHES & COSTELLO 55643 05/28/97 05/05/97 3000.00 ��� VENDOR TOTAL 3000.00 ���� 05 IMAGE DESIGN 55644 05/28/97 3384 05/02/P7 42.00 VENDOR TOTAL 42.00 35 INSTY-PRINTS 55645 05/28/97 12372 04/22/97 72.42 55645 05/28/97 12424 04/25/97 29.27 VENDOR TOTAL 101 .69 99 IZZO SYSTEMS, INC. 55646 05/28y97 41155 04/15/97 289.75 55646 05/28y97 42042 04y25y97 98.50 VENDOR TOTAL 388.25 DO ROBERT JOHNSON ASSOCI* 55647 05/28/97 04/17/97 450.00 VENDOR TOTAL 450.00 }0 KENNEDY & GRAVEN 55648 05/28/97 15687 O5/09/97 34.50 55648 05/28/97 15683 05y09/97 1954.02 55648 05/28/97 15684 05/09/97 670.43 55648 05/28/97 15685 05/09y97 6716.48 55648 05/28/97 15688 05y09/97 5730.73 55648 05/28/97 15299 05/09y97 193.62 55648 05/28/97 15669 05/09/97 130.00 55648 05/28/97 15670 05/09/97 1015.00 55648 05/28/97 15672 05/09/97 115.80 55648 05/28/97 15673 05/09/97 259.52 11, E 8 . ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW !DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI 0 DOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 55648 05y28/97 15674 05/09/97 1346.40 55648 05/28/97 15675 05/09/97 167.04 55648 05/28/97 15677 05/09/97 60.00 55648 05/28/97 15678 05/09/97 20.00 55648 05/28/97 15679 05/09y97 904.00 55648 05/28/97 15680 05/09/97 1050.50 VENDOR TOTAL 20368.04 00 LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER * 55651 05/28/97 05/28/97 135.00 . VENDOR TOTAL 135:00 70 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA C* 55652 05/28/97 3935 04/24/97 59.71 VENDOR TOTAL 59.71 30 LESCO INC. , 55653 05/28/97 9RE936 04/29/97 238.56 VENDOR TOTAL 238.56 4.5 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSP* 55654 05y28/97 04/30/97 600.94 VENDOR TOTAL 600.94 )0 LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES 55655 05/28/97 5241641555 05/02/97 52.A2 VENDOR TOTAL 52.62 0 MPLSPECIALTIES 55656 05y28/97 2692 04/22/97 116.90 411VENDOR TOTAL 116.90 :0 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO 55657 05/28/97 1150463 04/24/97 11 .46 55657 05/28/97 1151458 04/29/97 5.69 55657 05/28/97 1151457 04/29/97 422.27 55657 05/28/97 1163408 04/25/97 34.23 55657 05/28y97 1149643 04/21/97 68.82 55657 05/28/97 1148242 04/11/97 59.02 55657 05/28/97 1146414 04/01/97 11 .96 55657 05/28/97 1150331 04/23/97 65.01 55657 05/28/97 1150325 04/23/97 34.08 55657 05/28/97 1149203 04/17/97 204.97 55657 05/28/97 1149180 04/17/97 83.34 VENDOR TOTAL 1000.85 5 MENARDS 55659 05y28/97 23958 04/04/97 243.04 55459 05/28/97 24243 04/18/97 24.65 55659 05/28/97 24344 04/22/97 43.61 55659 05/28/97 24468 04/28/97 18. 19 55659 05/28/97 24572 05/01/97 7.87 VENDOR TOTAL 337.34 2 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPO* 55660 05/28/97 25391MB 05/13/97 153.46 55660 05y28/97 25330MB 05/05/97 52. 13 VENDOR TOTAL 205.59 III O 9 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECt. REGISTER C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI O VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 44 *WEST COCA-COLA BOT* 55661 05/28/97 00192182 05/01/97 14.91 55661 05/28/97 09673600 04/24/97 469.58 55661 05/28/97 09738898 05/01/97 242.04 55661 05/28/97 0980093:3 05/08/97 164.75 VENDOR TOTAL 891 .28 76 MINNESOTA COMMERCE DE* 55662 05/28/97 - 05/28/97 40.00 VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 E0 MINNESOTA CONWAY 55663 05/28/97 5M3504 2960 04/29/97 94.20 VENDOR TOTAL 94.20 +0 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT * 55664 05/28/97 05/28/97 46.00 VENDOR TOTAL 46.00 8 MINNESOTA GOLF CARS, * 55465 05/28/97 007993 05/07/97 151 .79 VENDOR TOTAL 151 .79 :9 MINN POLLUTION CONTR0* 5566 . 05/29/97 05/28/97 115.00 VENDOR TOTAL 115.00 '0 MINNESOTA WANNER COMP* 55667 05/28/97 0032765-IN 04/29/97 48.87 VENDOR TOTAL 48.87 '0 41110 FINANCIAL SERVIC* 55468 05/23/97 19422821 c15/28/97 i02.99 VENDOR TOTAL 102.99 O MIZUND GOLF COMPANY 55669 05/28/97 0710426 03/19/97 972.00 VENDOR TOTAL 972.00 O STATE CHEMICAL MFG CO 55670 05/28/97 02140557 02/14/97 132.58 VENDOR TOTAL 132.58 O MULT I CARE ASSOCIATES,* 55671 05/28/97 04/24/97 77.00 VENDOR TOTAL 77.00 O NEW BRIGHTON/MOUNDS V* 55672 05/2:3/97 05/28/97 105.00 VENDOR TOTAL 105.00 :0 NEW BRIGHTON, CITY OF 55473 05/28/97 05/28/97 46_:7.00 VENDOR TOTAL 4637.00 ) NIKE INC 55674 05/28/97 24206454 04/03/97 103. 10 55674 05/28/97 24206455 04/03/97 103. 10 55674 05/28/97 24204456 04/03/97 103. 10 55674 05/28/97 24206457 04/03/97 108. 11 55674 05/28/97 24517549 04/28/97 41 .04 55674 05/28/97 24517550 04/28/97 41 .06 55674 05/22/97 24517551 04/28/97 41 .0A 411 55674 05/28/97 24517552 04/28/97 41 .05 E 10 _ ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI 0 OR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 55674 05/28/97 23917533 03/14/97 15.27 55674 05/28/97 23917534 03/14/97 15.27 55674 05/28/97 23917535 03/14/97 15.27 55674 05/28/97 23917536 03/14/97 15.28 55674 05/28/97 23880353 03/13/97 166.34 55674 05/28/97 23880354 03/13/97 166.34 55674 05/28/97 23880355 03/13/97 166.33 55674 05/28/97 24131233 03/29/97 659.89 55674 05/28/97 23844400 03/10/97 442.27 . 55674 05/28/97 23844401 03/10/97 442.27 55474 05/28/97 23844402 03/10/97 442.28 55674 05/28/97 23988481 03/20/97 1945. 12 55674 05/28/97 23464768 02/12/97 12.42 55674 05/28/97 23515293 02/18/97 79.43 55674 05/28/97 23539379 02/19/97 628.50 55674 05/28/97 23539380 02y19y97 628.50 55474 05/28/97 23539381 02/19/97 628.48 55674 05/28/97 24056038 03/25/97 102. 15 55674 05/28/97 24056039 03/25/97 102. 15 55674 05/28/97 24056040 03/25/97 102. 13 55674 05/28/97 24338357 04/14/97 61 . 17 55674 05/28/97 24338358 04/14/97 61 . 17 55674 05/28/97 24338359 04/14/97 61 . 17 55674 05/28/97 24338360 04/14/97 61 . 17 ���� . � VENDOR TOTAL 7597 01 ��� O NORSEMAN AWARDS 55679 05/28/97 3065 05y06/97 94.96 VENDOR TOTAL 94.96 8 NO METRO 1-35W CORRID* 55680 05/28/97 04/23/97 2040.00 VENDOR TOTAL 204O.00 7 NORTH STAR INTERNATIO* 55681 05/28/97 67994 04/28/97 210.42 VENDOR TOTAL 210.42 O NORTH STAR TURF, INC 55682 05/28/97 141152 04y03/97 63.84 55682 05y28/97 144009 05/09/97 27.26 VENDOR TOTAL 91 . 10 ) NORTHERN HYDRAULICS I* 55683 05/28/97 18209383 05/12/97 48.96 VENDOR TOTAL 48.96 } NORTHERN SANITARY SUP* 55684 05/28/97 416167 05/08/97 123.88 VENDOR TOTAL 123.88 ) NORTHERN STATES POWER* 55685 05/28/97 05/28/97 1802.02 VENDOR TOTAL 1802.02 7 NORTHERN WATER WORKS * 55686 05/28/97 M159268 05/01/97 205.95 ��N� ��� 55686 05y28/97 M59589 05/01/97 53.52 )E 11 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER C10-01 ' MOUNDS VIEW DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI 0 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT -- VENDOR TOTAL 259.47 00 ODYSSEY GOLF 55687 05/28/97 18236800 04/23/97 351 .00 VENDOR TOTAL 351 .00 50 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 55688 05/28/97 96325 04/23/97 240.46 55688 05y28y97 32744 05/07/97 13.30 VENDOR TOTAL 253.76 00 O.W. I . RECYCLING, INC* 55689 05/28/97 9385 05/08/97 64.00 VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 00 PERFECT " 10" CAR WASH 55690 05/28/97 04/30/97 21 .32 VENDOR TOTAL 21 .32 00 PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY 55691 05/28/97 05/09/97 1306.48 VENDOR TOTAL 1306.48 75 PLAISTED COMPANIES IN* 55692 05/28/97 7969 04/30/97 472. 17 VENDOR TOTAL 472. 17 18 PRECISION LANDSCAPE &* 55693 05/28/97 05/13/97 4198.76 VENDOR TOTAL 4198.76 )0 GOLF 55494 05/28/97 00260499 03y25/97 2202.07 �� 55694 05/28/97 00262663 04/08/97 319.08 VENDOR TOTAL 2521 . 15 75 ST. PAUL, CITY OF 55695 05y28/97 048174 05/06/97 129. 13 VENDOR TOTAL 129. 13 )0 SAINT PAUL PIONEER PR* 55696 05/28y97 1884251 05/28/97 47. 19 VENDOR TOTAL 47. 19 11 SEARS 55697 05/28/97 62-48190-1-5 04/30/97 1 .62 55697 05/28/97 62-48190-1-4 04/23/97 10.75 55497 05/28/97 62-48190-1-3 04/16/97 9.65 55697 05/28/97 62-48190-1-1 04/10/97 497.44 VENDOR TOTAL 519.46 )0 SENSUS TECHNOLOGIES, * 55698 05/28/97 ZZ70012786 05/07/97 500.00 VENDOR TOTAL 500.00 /1 SHELDON, PAMELA 55699 05/23/97 05/28/97 198.00 VENDOR TOTAL 198.00 ,5 SNYDER S DRUG STORES ,* 55700 05/28y97 5044-000081 05/22/97 17.52 VENDOR TOTAL 17.52 AiNo LAKE PARK FIRE* 55701 05y28/97 05/28/97 498.751p 3E 12 . ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER 'C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW {DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI _1O COR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 498.75 )00 SPRING LAKE PARK LUMB* 55702 05/28/97 162859 04/23/97 85.24 55702 05/28/97 162175 04y01y97 53.25 VENDOR TOTAL 138.49 36 SRE SECURITY ALARM 55703 05y28/97 702084 05/14/97 1150.00 55703 05/28/97 702085 05/14/97 191 .70 VENDOR TOTAL 1341 .70 00 STANWAY EXCAVATING, I* 55704 05/28/97 40702 04/24y97 2426.00 VENDOR TOTAL 2426.00 00 STREICHER'S PROF. PGL* 55705 05/28/97 IN.85518. 1 05y02/97 206.30 55705 05/28/97 IN.85521 . 1 05/02y97 75. 11 VENDOR TOTAL 281 .41 00 SUBURBAN PROFANE 55706 05/28/97 435449 04y30y97 29.29 VENDOR TOTAL 29.29 00 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES 0* 55707 05/28y97 705061941 05y06/97 278.31 55707 05/28/97 704221955 04y22/97 380.01 55707 05y28/97 704291944 04/29/97 177.77 55707 05/28/97 705140049 05/14/97 115.89 111 VENDOR TOTAL 951 .98 -7/8 TOLL GAS & WELDING SU* 55708 05/28/97 554982 04y30/97 5. 10 VENDOR TOTAL 5. 10 30 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 55709 05/28/97 1665 & 1775 03/28/97 6930.66 VENDOR TOTAL 6930.66 )0 TURNBALL, JIM 55710 05/28y97 227174 04/28/97 759.00 VENDOR TOTAL 759.00 )0 U S WEST 55711 05/28/97 05/28/97 1583.49 VENDOR TOTAL 1583.49 )1 U S WEST COMMUNICATIO* 55713 05/28y97 05/28/97 64. 17 VENDOR TOTAL 64. 17 0 UNITED AGRI PRODUCTS 55714 05/28y97 0016650 04/21/97 22.38 55714 05/28y97 0016670 04/21/97 189.06 55714 05/28y97 0017588 05y14/97 12.29 VENDOR TOTAL 223.73 0 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE* 55715 05y28/97 740083280 04y30/97 47.90 55715 05/28/97 740084234 05y07y97 37.71 55715 05y28/97 740083289 04/30/97 36.41 III55715 05/28y97 740082354 04/23/97 S-'.03 GE 13. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW NIDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI \IO DOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATEill AMOUNT 55715 05y28/97 740084227 05/07/97 141 . 10 55715 05y28y97 740085161 05y14/97 182.53 VENDOR TOTAL 477.68 }06 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCT* 55717 05/28/97 B4744 05/02/97 20.72 VENDOR TOTAL 20.72 /(_0 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BL* 55718 05/28/97 899-874602 04/25/97 229.81 VENDOR TOTAL 229.81 )19 WESTERN BANK 55719 05/28/97 05/28/97 350.00 VENDOR TOTAL 350.00 90 WILSON SPORTING GOODS* 55720 05/28/97 1469532 04/14/97 319.20 55720 05y28/97 1470867 04/15y97 445.07 55720 05y28/97 1482329 04/25/97 59.30 VENDOR TOTAL 823.57 00 YAMAHA MOTOR CORP. , U* 55721 05/28/97 M95083770 04/14y97 236.00 VENDOR TOTAL 236.00 GRAND TOTAL 138673. 12 III 411 2 1 _ . ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REOISTE 210-02 MOUNDS VIEW ]OR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI ] V NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT .8 H0LTHPARTNERS 54981 05/08/97 05/08/97 645.74 VENDOR TOTAL 645.74 10 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE 54982 05/08y97 05/08/97 708.33 VENDOR TOTAL 708.33 N PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 54983 05/08/97 05/08y97 5656. 17 VENDOR TOTAL 5656. 17 9 WESTERN BANK 54984 05/08/97 05/08/97 3499.05 54984 05/08/97 05/08/97 948. 17 54984 05/08/97 05y08/97 60696.38 54984 05/08/97 05y08y97 27530.91 VENDOR TOTAL 92674.51 2 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST* 54985 05/08/97 05/08/97 123.01 VENDOR TOTAL 123.01 0 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE 54986 05/08/97 05/08/97 2.30 VENDOR TOTAL 2.30 0 LINDOUIST BAKERY 54987 05/12/97 05/12/97 23.99 VENDOR TOTAL 23.99 8 • OFF. .ROBERT E 54988 05/13/97 05/13/97 40 00 VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 3 MPL SPECIALTIES 54989 05/13y97 05/13/97 250.00 VENDOR TOTAL 250.00 .11 OFFICE DEPOT, INC. 54990 05/14/97 05/14/97 73.01 VENDOR TOTAL 73.01 ) NORTHERN STATES POWER* 54991 05/14/97 05/14/97 4507.69 VENDOR TOTAL 4507.69 . AT&T WIRELESS SERVICE* 54993 05y16/97 05/16/97 88.72 VENDOR TOTAL 88.72 ) UNITED STATES POSTAL * 54993 05/15/97 05/15/97 2000.00 VENDOR TOTAL 2000.00 ' KIDD, DAVID 54994 05/19/97 05/19y97 75.00 VENDOR TOTAL 75.00 BACKYARD BUILDING SYS* 54995 05/19/97 05/19/97 597.94 VENDOR TOTAL 597.94 ) MINNESOTA DEPT OF REV* 54996 05/19/97 05/19y97 168.00 IIIVENDOR TOTAL 168.00 SE -C10-0` ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTE 'fLfOR MOUNDS VIEW CHECK CHECK INVOICE DATEiNUMBER , INVOICEDI ll INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 07 MANTHCS, FEN 54,719:: 05/20/97 VENDOR TOTAL 3•=0.00 17 COMPTON , EDWARD 54',7, 05/2{"}/97 VENDOR TOTAL 350.00 1'-, WESTERN BANK 55000 05/21/%7,7: 1,; cr wl_2f)t_} Os/21 /c,7 {'1�r�''•':i'f:f7 A5543.06 55000 o5/21/%"7,7 35374. 30 05/22/%7;7 05/22/97 ''._{_4.41 =,ci{j{i 05/22/.:17'17 • : 05/22,--77 1014.08 VENDOR TOTAL 10575%7/.35 DO PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 55`0005/21 /c)7 o5/-q/%7/7 05/21/'1! 7'="1„00 VENDOR TOTAL 5';',10.0R O F' E I F' .-,5{ 03 05/21P:17 5 ;-. 1P7,7 13232.74 VENDOR TOTAL. 13232.74 2 I CMA RETIREMENT TRUST* 55004 05/21 /'; 7 05/21/ci7 123.01 VENDOR TOTAL 1' :3„0 1 4 ill NELSON , LANCE 5500505/21/%7/7 - VENDOR TOTAL. 50.00 GOODHUE COUNTY NATION* 55004 05/12/,=17 ,_, 4:5. {i{_f 05/12/%7/7 244.54 VENDOR TOTAL 244.84 I SAM'S CLUB 55007 Cl ",/-'1/%7/7 r-_ : 04/05/.1;7 II7. 1 1: VENDOR TOTAL 147. 12 ; SUFERAMER I CA ,5003��•-f - 05/22/'=17 0c VENDOR TOTAL • - . ELAN FINANCIAL SERVIC.A• _,_� _ _, ,r 7 05 0/'_.J-r VENDOR TOTAL. 1 3.00 GRAND TOTAL - • Item No. V f Staff Report No. Il —2.1 CL. • Meeting Date: 5-27-97 Type of Business: CA WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Lynnette Morgan-AA Item Title/Subject: Approval of Step Adjustment for Cable TV Technician/Producer and Public Works Foreman Date of Report: May 22, 1997 The following positions are due to receive step adjustments. Performance for both positions have been satisfactorily reflected in their performance reviews. Both step adjustments are consistent with the City's 5 Step Compensation Plan. Patrick Toth, Cable TV Technician/Producer has been with the City of Mounds View since June 10, 1996. A step adjustment is due advancing from step 2 to step 3. Tim Pittman has been with the City in the capacity of Public Works Foreman since January 1, • 1996. A step adjustment is due advancing from step 3 to step 4. Recommendation: Motion to approve step adjustments. • Item No. Staff Report No. 7- O r C Meeting Date: • Type of Business: WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and members of the City Council From: Bruce A. Kessel, Finance Director Item Title/Subject: Update on costs associated with Airport issues. Date of Report: May 21, 1997 Over the last several months, the City has had Bob Long involved with issues associated with the airport and recently with possible legislation relating to airport issues. The legislation initiative is outside the scope of our retainer for legal services and as such, is billed at$115.00 per hour. For the month of April the charges for this service was $5,730.73 and it is anticipated that the bill for May will be comparable. The 1997 budget did not contemplate such services and as such, no amount was included in the budget,however, $50,000 was budgeted in the general fund contingency. When we have a final dollar amount, we will be requesting a budget modification to cover this expenditure. • • Item No. 1 1 A Staff Report No. Meeting Date: May 27, 1997 -• Type of Business: Council Business WK Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Jim Ericson, Planning Associate/Pamela Sheldon, CD Director Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution No. 5127, Approving a General Concept Plan to Allow Development of Commercial and Residential Uses at 2704-2740 Highway 10 and 7801 Silver Lake Road; Planning Case No. 477-97 Date of Report: May 23, 1997 Overview: Proposal: The applicants, D.W. Jones, Inc. and Five D Limited, are requesting approval of a rezoning from B-2, Limited Business District, to a mixed-use PUD,Planned Unit Development, and approval of a general concept plan for properties located southeast of the intersection of Highway 10 and Silver Lake Road. Excluding that property occupied by TJB Homes,the eight parcels in this development cover approximately 13 acres. George and Christine Winiecki is no longer partners in this project as they • have sold their property to Five D Limited and purchased the site now occupied by TJB Homes. The uses proposed with this development include: • gas station/convenience market with fast food restaurant/car wash • sit-down style restaurant • 83-unit senior housing complex • one-story office building There are two actions needing City Council approval to allow this project to go forward. These include: t approval of a general concept plan; and approval of the ordinance changing the City's official zoning map for this property from B-2 to PUD On April 16, 1997,the Planning Commission, in Resolution 505-97, recommended approval of the rezoning and general concept plan by a three to two vote margin. Action by City Council to Date: At your meeting on April 28,the City Council introduced for first reading Ordinance No. 599 which would change the zoning designation on the D.W. Jones property to PUD. The resolution regarding the general concept plan was not before you at that time, because staff expected to prepare it for the meeting when you would be considering second reading of Ordinance No. 599. Since the April 28 meeting, the City Attorney and staff have consulted further about the order in which actions need to be taken. We are suggesting for this meeting,that City Council take action .3 City of Mounds View Staff Report Planning Case No.477-97:D.W.Jones Property May 24, 1997 Page 2 on the resolution related to the general concept plan first(Resolution No. 5127)and then take action on the change to the zoning map(Ordinance No. 599). Resolution No. 5127 is attached to this report, which covers the issues from the April 28 meeting. Ordinance No. 599 is attached to the staff report on the rezoning ordinance. At the April 28 meeting, City Council directed the applicants to provide additional information pertaining to certain issues as follows: • Redelineation of the wetland • Further review of the site impact traffic analysis • Analysis of drainage calculations and on-site ponding • Explore feasibility of underground parking at senior complex • Review of site plan by professional urban designer Discussion: Redelineation of the wetland; encroachment into the wetland buffer: The wetland on the site has been redelineated as shown on the revised site plan dated May 22, 1997. The new delineation indicates that the wetland area has decreased in size since the last delineation was done in 1992. As a result,the extent to which the uses encroach into the 100 foot wetland buffer decreases from and estimated 45 percent to 40 percent along the northwest and northeast • side of the wetland where development is concentrated. There is no encroachment from this development in the buffer area along the south side of the wetland. There is also more room on site for the placement and expansion of NURP ponds as a result of the new delineation. Further review of the site impact traffic analysis: Staff arranged to have traffic engineers at SEH review the traffic analysis prepared by Biko Associates for the applicants. Glen Van Wormer and John Hagen from SEH responded with their comments in a memorandum dated May 9, 1997 (attached). The original traffic study labeled the driveways as shown in the attached site plan. Their concerns with Biko Associates' traffic analysis were focused on: • traffic volume attributed to driveway"D • stacking on Silver Lake Road • absence of a.m. peak period analysis for driveways "A"and"B" • conflict points between traffic movements on the site SEH calculated volumes for the driveway D access point which were significantly different from those of BikoAssociates. The stacking of vehicles northbound on Silver Lake Road at peak periods could block access to driveway D, making it difficult for vehicles southbound on Silver Lake Road to gain access at driveway D. Bill Smith of Biko Associates responded to SEH's concerns in a memo dated May 15, 1997 (attached). Mr. Smith provided revised traffic volumes for driveway D, additional documentation concerning stacking on Silver Lake Road, explained that both MnDOT and the County had determined that a.m. peak period traffic analysis would not be needed, and presented further information regarding on-site circulation. • SEH reviewed Biko Associates' response to its concerns and offered conclusions in a memo dated May 20, 1997 (attached). City of Mounds View Staff Report Planning Case No.477-97:D.W.Jones Property May 24, 1997 111) Page 3 SEH does not expect stacking on Silver Lake Road--both northbound and southbound--to be a problem. Stacking on the northbound side may affect access to Driveway D for southbound motorists who want to turn left into the gas station site. Stacking is not expected to block the service road, and therefore motorists have an alternative. Also, since Silver Lake Road is four lanes wide at this point,motorists who want to travel south will have a way to get around motorists waiting to turn left into Driveway D or the service road. The revised traffic volumes submitted by Biko are consistent with SEH's calculations. SEH has noted that conflict points on-site continue to be a concern, caused by having the entrance to the two drive-thru aisles just after motorists enter the site at Driveway D,the need to cross Driveway D to go from the gas pumps to the drive-thru aisles, and the driveway from the service road which cuts across the car wash stacking lane. Staff has discussed with the applicant the possibility of dropping the drive thru aisle for the fast food restaurant and they are willing to consider it. This issue is noted in the stipulations and would be resolved at the development plan review. Q Drainage system: The site plan indicates two NURP ponds to handle the predicted run-off from this development. Rocky Keehn with SEH Inc. has reviewed the drainage calculations and the proposed ponding and has made a number of conclusions in a memorandum dated May 22, 1997 (attached). First,the NURP pond located at the southeast corner of the site(the east pond)is not feasible because the wetland extends out toward Highway 10, separating the pond from the development. While it would be possible to convey the water to the proposed pond via ditches or piping parallel to Highway 10,this would entail an alteration to the wetland itself and approval from regulatory agencies. • A further complication arises in that there is an existing stormwater intake culvert running under Highway 10 that carries discharge from approximately 26 acres north of the development. Use of the Highway 10 drainage ditch to convey runoff from the development to the proposed NURP pond would require the NURP pond to be sized large enough to accommodate both the development and the additional 26 acres of runoff. These factors contribute to the east pond's lack of feasibility. The second NURP pond--the central pond-- between the senior building and restaurant, while properly located, appears to be too small to handle the runoff directed to it. There appears to be sufficient room,however,to expand the pond as needed. A pond is likely needed to handle the runoff from the senior building and its parking lot, and the most likely location is south of the senior building where the nature overlook is shown. The remaining issue then is accommodating the runoff from the proposed office building south of TJB Homes, which could be accomplished with a small pond or grassed swale immediately adjacent to the office building and its parking area. Staff feels that the size of the office building would have to be reduced in order to provide for the necessary ponding. This issue has been discussed with the applicant, and they are willing to consider reducing the building from 5,000 square feet to 4,000 square feet. This would reduce the impervious area by at least 1,740 square feet and perhaps more, depending on building configuration and whether a driveway connection is made to TJB Homes. Staff has changed the maximum building area for the office building at the south end of the site to 4,000 square feet in the PUD stipulations. The • final layout of this site and the density allowed would be addressed in the development plan review. City of Mounds View Staff Report Planning Case No.477-97:D.W.Jones Property May 24, 1997 Page 4 Underground parking for senior citizen apartment building: There have been questions raised whether underground parking for the senior building will work with the water table. On May 13, 1997,the applicants performed a soil pit investigation to determine the elevation of the water table where the proposed senior building would be located. Accompanying the applicants was Wayne Jacobsen, a soil scientist with SEH. Two holes were dug and ground water was not encountered until a depth of 13 feet was reached. This translates into an elevation of approximately 897. From this investigation then,it appears that underground parking for the senior building could be possible, contingent on review by the City Engineer once a minimum building elevation for the garage had been established. 17 Site design. Design theme along Highway 10: Staff contacted Todd Rhoades,with Cermak and Rhoades,to do a design critique of the general concept plan and to make suggestions on site layout. Several different alternative layouts were suggested, using different combinations of uses on the site. These sketches have been further refined and will be presented at the May 27 City Council meeting. Staff would suggest the following design principles be incorporated into the PUD stipulations: • The corner at Silver Lake Road and Highway 10 shall be treated as a gateway to the Mounds View Village Center. A specific design plan for this area shall be submitted at the time of development plan review,which could include such improvements as a low wall with signage announcing the Mounds View Village Center, a rich palette of • landscaping with trees, shrubs and flowers, and special lighting and fencing which would also be used to establish a design theme along Highway 10. • Materials used in the corner development for the buildings,the pillars used to support the gas station canopy and for the sign supports shall be of high quality,masonry construction, with architectural detailing and a unifying color scheme carried throughout. • The sit-down restaurant be grouped with the two office buildings and a"parking court" be created between these uses and the gas station/convenience market on the corner. The service drive shall follow the perimeter of the parking court to ease the curves which must be navigated by service vehicles. • A walkway connection be created between the senior citizen housing project,the restaurant and the office buildings. Pedestrian circulation be considered in the design of the gas station/convenience market site. • Effort should be made to create a driveway connection between TJB Homes and the development to the north and to the south to provide motorists a way to get between uses without having to go out onto Highway 10. Appropriateness of the Uses: As discussed at the April 28, 1997 Council meeting,the proposal for a mixed use PUD is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Highway 10/Area 9 Redevelopment Report prepared by SRF Consulting and presented to the City Council on April 7, 1997 suggested that a PUD approach to development of this site would be the preferred option. The alternative suggested City of Mounds View Staff Report Planning Case No.477-97:D.W.Jones Property May 24, 1997 Page 5 • by SRF Consulting is to join the two corner parcels and re-zone them to B-3,Highway Commercial. B- 3 zoning would be consistent with the types of uses best suited for this location:non-destination types of commercial development,based on impulse buying and catering to the needs of the high volume of traffic present daily on Highway 10. A market analysis was prepared in conjunction with the SRF Report by the Towle Real Estate Group. The Towle Report concluded that this site's highest and best use would be a mixed use development. The types of uses noted as feasible included an intensive development oriented for commercial business that relies on"impulse"traffic, rather than destination- oriented traffic; low-rise office and/or medical/professional building that would be oriented to either a single tenant or multiple tenants; some type of destination-oriented commercial service facility(or facilities)such as light auto repair, a mortuary, a bank, etc; and a higher density residential project or partially-or fully-assisted senior housing complex. The property at the corner of Silver Lake Road and Highway 10 was identified as the most valuable property in the study area, and that it was ideal for convenience-oriented, "impulse"type commercial development. All of the uses proposed are consistent with the Towle report. There has been some concern expressed by the Planning Commission, and by citizens participating in the discussions during the Area 9 Study that they did not want to see another gas station developed along Highway 10. Some people have stated that they feel that Mounds View already has a sufficient number of gas stations, and another gas station is not needed. Some people have said that their opposition is based more on the image that a gas station presents at the gateway to the City's Village Center. Others have said that it is the use itself which is objectionable. • Staff believes that there are ways to design the corner development in a way that presents a pleasing image and creates a gateway to the Mounds View Village Center. We have discussed with the applicant the idea of upgrading the materials used in the buildings,widening the landscaped area at the corner so a low wall could be built with signage announcing that motorists are now entering the Mounds View Village Center; adding shrubs,trees and flowers at the corner;putting low, decorative fencing along the Silver Lake Road and Highway 10 frontages tied to the wall to create a feeling of a gateway; and installing special lighting. Staff would also suggest that the Western State Bank be approached to ask if a similar entry statement could be built on the north side of Highway 10(wall, signage, fencing, lighting and landscaping). We have also talked with the applicant about pushing the building into the corner, and they do not regard that as a feasible alternative for the convenience store/gas station use. The applicant's preference is to establish the gateway using landscaping, signage, lighting and fencing rather than using the building at the corner, and they have indicated that they are very willing to use high quality design in developing this site. The questions before City Council consist of the following: • Is it possible to achieve the community desire to create a gateway and accommodate the proposed gas station use? Staff believes that there is a design solution to this question, and the applicant has indicated a willingness to do what is needed. • Is the gas station use acceptable, given the fact that the zoning must be changed to allow it to be developed? The community has a choice since the current zoning does not allow this use and • the City Council must approve any change in zoning. It has been noted earlier that the Towle Report considers this type use as most appropriate for this site. The applicant has provided a City of Mounds View Staff Report Planning Case No.477-97:D.W.Jones Property May 24, 1997 Page 6 market study showing that there is unmet demand for a gas station. Citizen comments have indicated that there is a community sentiment that Mounds View has enough gas stations. • If the gas station use is not developed on this site,what are the alternatives? The applicant has indicated that they want the total package of uses proposed for the corner(gas station, convenience market, car wash, fast food restaurant). It is to be expected that if the gas station goes away, so does the car wash. It is unknown if a convenience store would be successful without a gas station use, but staff believes it is fair to say it will be less successful than if a gas station is included,given the consumer's drive for convenience. The possibility exists that this corner could be developed for one or two stand-alone, fast food restaurants, or that the convenience market could be combined with a fast foot restaurant. There is also a market in Area 9 in general, according to the Towle Report,for multi-family housing, office, and destination commercial like a bank or mortuary. Staff regards this as a community decision, and also feels that using this corner for something other than commercial(e.g. multiple family residential)is missing an opportunity to build the City's economic base. PUD Stipulations/Miscellaneous Staff has prepared stipulations which would be adopted as part of the general concept plan. These are attached to Resolution No. 5127. We have underlined that portions that are different from what you . saw for your April 28 meeting. Many of the changes reflect the fact that we now have more information on the wetland boundary, drainage and groundwater conditions. One issue which remains unresolved at this point concerns the Planning Commission's and staffs original recommendation that the PUD stipulations include a requirement that a trail be built around the wetland, as part of a City-wide system of trails. One of the difficulties of implementing such as idea on this property is that the TJB Homes property is not included in this PUD. The new owner of this property is opposed to having a trail behind his building, and a trail would be incomplete without crossing this property. The applicants for the D.W. Jones property are concerned about a trail behind the senior housing project for security reasons. Staff feels that it is important that a walkway connection be made between this PUD,the Silver Lake Pointe project and Silver View Park, and to use the amenity of the wetland as part of the City's trail system. (A possible alternative is to build a trailway along the St. Paul Waterworks pipeline easement from Silver Lake Road, allowing a connection between the two senior citizen buildings and a connection through the site to the businesses at County Road I/Highway 10. Sidewalks along County Road I and Silver Lake Road, and Highway 10 could create a loop around the site.)We have included in the PUD stipulations that this issue will be reviewed by the Parks&Recreation Commission and decided by the City Council as part of the development plan review. Recommendation: Option 1: Adopt Resolution No. 5127, Approving a General Concept Plan to Allow Development of Commercial and Residential Uses at 2704-2740 Highway 10 and 7801 Silver Lake Road as submitted. City of Mounds View Staff Report Planning Case No.477-97:D.W.Jones Property May 24, 1997 • Page 7 Option 2: Amend the general concept plan and PUD Stipulations to omit the gas station use, and adopt Resolution No. 5127 as amended. Pk/nUa ketiu. Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Director Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 5127 2. PUD Stipulations 3. Site Plan with Driveways Lettered(Prepared by Biko Associates) 4. Letter from SEH regarding traffic issues,dated May 9, 1997 5. Response from Biko Associates,dated May 15, 1997 6. Follow-up Letter from SEH regarding traffic issues,dated May 20, 1997 7. Letter from SEH regarding drainage issues,dated May 22, 1997 8. Letter from SEH regarding soil investigation,dated May 16, 1997 9. Revised General Concept Plan with new wetland delineation(blueprint) • N:\DATA\USERS\PAMS\SHARE\DEVCASES\477-9NONESCC3.RPT • • RESOLUTION NO. 5127 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION APPROVING A GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES AT 2704-2740 HIGHWAY 10 AND 7801 SILVER LAKE ROAD; PLANNING CASE NO. 477-97. WHEREAS, D.W. Jones Inc. and Five D Limited have applied for approval of a general concept plan for the development of a convenience market/gas station/car wash/fast food restaurant, sit down restaurant, office building(s), and a senior citizen housing project on property bounded by Highway 10, the St. Paul Waterworks pipeline easement, and Silver Lake Road, and described as follows: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 30, Range 23,Ramsey County,Minnesota described as beginning at the southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter;thence easterly along the south line of said Southeast Quarter 1,346.90 feet to the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 10;thence northwesterly along said center line 1,434.13 feet to the center line of Silver Lake Road;thence southwesterly and southerly 1,219.64 feet along said last centerline to the point of beginning. Subject to State Trunk Highway No. 10,Silver Lake Road and St.Paul Waterworks Right of Way. 1111 Except that part of said Southeast Quarter described as commencing at the southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter and measuring easterly along the south line of said Section 6 a distance of 1,346.9 feet to the intersection of the center line of Highway No. 10(Anoka Cut-off);thence northwesterly along the centerline of said Highway No. 10,a distance of 765.9 feet to the point of beginning;thence southwesterly at right angles to the center line of said Highway No. 10 a distance of 275 feet;thence northwesterly and parallel with said centerline 100 feet;thence northeasterly at a right angle to the centerline of said Highway No. 10;thence southeasterly along said Highway No. 10 to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, the applicants have submitted a general concept plan prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons and dated 5/22/97 which shows the general location of uses and buildings, walkways, parking areas, access points, access drives, buffer areas, and open space areas to be left undeveloped; and, WHEREAS, the PUD stipulations attached to the general concept plan specify the maximum densities, minimum setbacks and maximum building heights to be allowed, and special criteria applicable to the development to this PUD; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: • 1. Planning Application 2. Zoning Map • 3. PUD Concept Plan,dated 5/22/97 City Council Resolution No. 5119 May 12, 1997 Page 2 4. Letter from Applicant(dated 3/5/97) 5. Letter from Developer(dated 3/27/97) 6. Estimated Tax Impact(dated 3/19/97) 7. Market/traffic analysis(dated 3/19/97) 8. Letter from Ramsey County Traffic Engineer(dated 4/23/97) 9. Letter from MnDOT(dated 3/3/97) 10. Letter from Minnesota DNR(dated 3/3/97) 11. Letter from Army Corps of Engineers(dated 3/3/97) 12. Letter from St.Paul Water Utility(dated 2/24/97) 13. Letters from residents 14. Letter from SEH regarding traffic issues,dated May 9, 1997 15. Response from Biko Associates,dated May 15, 1997 16. Follow-up Letter from SEH regarding traffic issues,dated May 20, 1997 17. Letter from SEH regarding drainage issues,dated May 22, 1997 18. Letter from SEH regarding soil investigation,dated May 16, 1997 WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has received a recommendation of approval from the Mounds View Planning Commission as stated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 505-97; and, WHEREAS, the proposed general concept plan is consistent with the Mounds View • Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of the Mounds View PUD Zoning District; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council does hereby approve the general concept plan for the D.W. Jones Property prepared by E.G. Rud& Sons and dated 5/22/97, subject to the stipulations contained in Exhibit 1, to the requirement that approval be obtained for a development stage plan and final plan as provided in Section 1120.04 Subd. 3 and Subd. 4 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, and that the property owner(s) execute the PUD stipulations and that the PUD stipulations be recorded with the Ramsey County Recorder. ADOPTED this 12th day of May, 1997. Duane McCarty, Mayor ATTEST: Charles S. Whiting, City Clerk-Administrator (SEAL) N:\DATA\USERS\PAMS\SHARE\DEVCASES\477-97\477CP.RES • ,1 c CO m mM m o .00 ilihik • 0 ° .6 O 0 t � v ° �V 0 ° c r i.c N W c Oz y �.c c a � m c :: 2w3 aO aw ?. W O 1m C > ° 3y 4° N w 8 m .c E g C d . .. U _ Uo a) CmC = E � aww .= 0).-=. D ° . � co ) 2 0ON = ° ao c a) = o CL XI a% .. t6 ° ,_ w: ca u) 4- fn o L CO X .r :gw o u) o -0 VI o ,. coi m 3 � N CUCON L. d c m = c _a E '- aa) C CoEic w r m � a� o ° 'o o c . .0 ° c :4 —° ,.. Z = c caw ° aci a -v y aqj o CO R ca a —' O CO ,. 0 >... c o RM o C � � 0.. 3Ha ... CO m . a) , .°'. c C 0 w °: V .c c Rrli_m .6IX 't CU 0 o y ..ca w CD � a) o ° � rEt cJ = a 8 0 •-• =a .t .0 Q. Q W 0 ° a ° � � Y ° ° l o c o c0 .. w- o o L) o •' co ;? c0 ci o CO CO22 = m rJ. V fq m w ' N a) 0 a) 0 - a m N � c > u c o tO � Z CD 0 = c 0 U Nrew R m cal o' fn � >. m 0 _c = ..• C 0) c. ° d .0 CO f/) c ° co 3 v .. .- c W 0 tN a) .ri. C o cQZ copZ 3L R (5O • 13 ; ' - a) E C 1- C u) 03 (4 0000000 .00 - 0)>..= • . G/) .Q' V) C V o z C 3 0 0 = a) c0 O_ Z c C V M .. Z o .c _�� C E"c H .= oNRCw = RCco 500m ° a°)) a Z _ o .0 0 0 a) Y o. o ,� o •«.. t • 6 3 . 0 CL = C •ayC = C ... dC . >. c =E-. p, 3 t . . ..... c ) m H • •R . ° . R o ° ° c c cOoNOso02 O > r- hRrnF= io v) n00 = Cio . csi A O zA a Ow t Ts 1 1 , i a "�•' i �/s N..;r ;u "'S Is Slit. ,....0,` .,� j// 4/// •• • _ . fT.Lt.. l• O I SIVI•10 G•,01 3- a • aCOMIsv3 Ti /P a * Ti•-. /n . r Nittop s.: • . i , .2...0.7.- , v• / 3aisaNNns • :: ' E-1 .a,^ /� .� et:et W re �r� ,dr • a I u W/" I '.. 0' O2Ml • / • ,figitia, . .:, ,. •.. !.73. i A, iS 1 • *7 i ; LI-1 . 4 t 1ktirop , ,.... ' •�A 1 J' . f O' O 4.: 4. ,. .. , L. I is; . . 4 ,. w >4 > :l T '• • �cyj :,/ Q III - fl. i ' ate, r VIit Q„ t7 ,., � .�-»,rn . ' _ a wow OI N_ N d' O 0 0 . 0 ... as co 0. Oz •z coMst E d5 NI: -- U r00 � N c., O x x Q al cuO M .•..-. .-. .-..-..-..r E E E in E r N co r N LI 03 m a) m a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) aoi a) a) a) C a) ,�.a O Z cu o M 0) m a) a) a) w 0) a) a1 a) a) w 0) 4) 0 0 a) a ,-. O � � o ocn000 0 00000o COaocn yN � F" a • M Cr) OM r NMr O NNNS• M M V � .Mi r r r A w O +,+ co a) II o 0 0 H ETA a) co aa) U O L . co .— CO e c w c c > 0) � 4 c cn _ 022 o y C co U) O C) F" 0 m m .0 W Q. W m C .. U N 'N O Q .y 10 > — c 0 O > - W C a) Z ) c y r 'C o > y ' ' l't .L- C = o L `- oo — d a a. 03 •-. C41 Ha c°o E ° cQw? oc � � o ` c°)i � a� oc � �� cyu3L F r� 0 a. �a m a .a .c Cu 'c CO 03 .c • a) `m csi3 •c c3 cn Ft 0- 32 cn3 0 o m 3 cu cu w- cn1— lei a I-- � = s > cn v) 2u) Q. S. 5cn COO0cncoO Ca rx a w A • � A ow . O z oI-. w '.o xcax • .... a ` A ° . y x xcucx 3 co d w ° EEeUaE EEA3a) � cc •• ymi yac° o a) vi ..c Ec cn a II II O - •� C y y p p of . o () W O U U U V U U L v0 03 CO 03 03 al CD im) C' •a) CO N y'C'; L° C0000 7O co .-000 CO :) a) MvNti � in O c3 a O � M '�t ; a) ° � � � E � � O co Mre - corn 3 0-+� a. 000 v a) O O a) O ,_ al ... C ., V o i) L •II f3 EV C O 03 7 •— C a) a) a) o E W ~ �+ c E � co2 � A -c •y a) C " •z o O F, WW � � cv) � N � v�i � acics c °' Z c°ac°occucuu 2Q c E a) a) y a) - a) _ E .•. co o a n. u7 w o o w w o 'xL °, a) = c3 ca o -0w Ti; coo c E ry7 � 7 arx taco ~ � y .r c > L ° u. o co trot w a) E • su -0 0 O 'Fi ° -0 . -o m a0a ca) a) Cca'a 45 aoc o0) � � we .= v E c o m `u c .° -6 cu : �. a) .c H > vi L L •= FL W c O C C :. w C. al E w OOC ":; as 3 - A oc N y y cu a) p r to C C .y U O L n U rcca73a) O > o .� — .- cnCCs a) [a.o) cc3 II -pY W J+°) : � � NLoty > 3vv 13 0./ OLc ° a) s ua -a ooceocu al CO 42 E co y a) al -0j a) nc'`) •� w ow =a C� c) UtDOOcn a) N a) d _ v a•— co a • 12wa) � _ cco . w . - 3 � y "dcN ° 'v� > = -, doyw ° vwv ' v ohs R c � � a ° c wow t3 !) C cn N ° COCY r N Mer -di 0 (' O a) C o .°c -0 z 4 O 0 > 000. 0 y - �13 a) a) a) V N C ` y C N N QaayiE > w ° � mo � 2 uL 1 v) 0V � V 'cvII DC7 0 C; Qw c = � G v 3 cov a a as y cL3 v C0 �n0cn < 5 ANa w a) .-. C a) . 1� O a) ON N `. .L. ''EL 0,1 c U) U) O1� NL CZ >. v_ U v- c 0 -0 CO a) C CO 0 0 "' 'n 0 c0 ° CCO CO 0 a) N N C N L O 4 o ZN .. •a) o2 U) a) ~ m a>, > c Z -C Q O N a) L wal L L 'C .c R Y C 0 M 0 0 0L O W O -0 .2 c � cr' ° o - = '6 `mc) a) t-- a) oL QED •Co ti) 13) wL � 0 .Ci. i a�ioo .. cu of U � Z. o U) 4-• a) L ,tv� a) C1w. L ,� E '� Nc� o _ a n � t m43 > € c � o c -o 08 y -o° ° o E � E O O 3 = I- , _ O ° 03 co • a) C a' -o 0 U L y w. a Naas -o ° n E c c a' a' z . c °) OCOr o �� c� a' r- ooccu o c o °c - R o = a) rs, 0 m uD � vic0) 'v 0. cIIcalCc •NH aiCRw5 , 'El ,�.) � Z e 0 c coti c22 n •° y •ca ° 0 �u ccu � y 3 as a O co ,c a E cwW E "4• co) a.c a) a R E a' a•11 k. 2 U '1-7). '5 o °) waa - 1i *C' o' v� U ° ° La) tnE � v mmoa) Om o > — �° 0 o > o 3 m c c cn o= o o coPcu ccuuoo � oa m TS Jo 0 c w0 o f 0. r, • .2 c ;° oa) 30cc° 0 _c _Nma) 0a' . =a Q v C13 o cw- O. At � (� > U 4. a =° > v)c cv c a � `° � m ° � }' E a - � 2-ai '° c 000°).°° cu0 � >°+2 .0 EtIIo .ccafQ O U O. o) 2 aa�ioo .0oc a, `u �>, LoI— .0 .... •° vi 0 ,ca) CC .r cu to e H 00 ,20 c c m -0 o fn O ° w 0 3 0 V OC a' - v' cu O a0 O W ,� c`°i o 0 0 al ISE R a) a U °3 • cu •° r c- a' 3 - °-0 E a' > �° 11 U U iloa a) EONocov' '- O' > c�jo� •o c v' c •c mL yo-2 a•c c a. a 0 a= V cuasco � a .0 a) c :Q c Ti) ccu 0 Z 0 _• as a) .., U c� 0 o u' o c 0. a a....._..,-a`� '_' ° N) • a a- U) I,.. .".• � cQ •Ec-ucara ci ° L_ oc ° � cy_ C DCOCaV - c 713 - 0 Fes-' a >'CO c • > O > ias a) ° E O o c II OV .0- cuc 0 -a c aN a) 0 it o W � O 3 :° ° (4 -4S m cru L R o .- a' 3 •L :o. � a' • O v' EU x aw rb a) 0. a a, 0cRIaai 'CCa°) cuma3' r° C0)o Loa' > 0 � >. a E� L N O - N a) OW •-• 0) co ■ Q rnaN c.0 is a_ o cnw > -a to ° LL. cif •N -o .0wU ■ d LQ lig WA >0 al O • C h oV �. aL ... O 4... 0 . 0 p ,C QW L �, C 0jco 0 a) 0. a) ` � � �>, � N 3 °R ua _ -0 ..8 o ° a0Cb � ? a o a O C) CO o CO CO 0 a) •— a o C7 `° ct � o` o` ' V < o, c o ° � ° S. � a E (1) c ° c' . Q E °- aa)) 0 a) 13 3 m � o) � � .c c 1- c O � � C 0 .u) thin > „•- 13 c Z 0 W j, 0 0 -0 ami o 0 a) cu O ° a1 • L V ° CO CO 0 C CO O -d a) ,0 0 a) � vari > cn � E `° COcb.. -4,.. 04:2tcEc 0 co 0 a Y Hr ,n cu H c O, .a00 .-- V U 'w .0a Q. cn oo Ca 0L � Fr) % c 03 CO CO o 412 ..617c``o v, a) 'o W N ) Lc) 'I" co i .- 3 + wN y a) a) 4 0 $ 0 axi Z + .E °.� aa'a c.w0oQ c 0. ' a) ca " - E 'm ° a' W .Qa U) Uf U' d Uf t0 aO, 0 `_ w .. U O y y - a o~ UUU QUO Uv) U ° U •a `- 0 3a) a.� Ccc 0W cQ (U W co (U fQ cu cu M cQ E co a) m C CO i .0 CO > p ,O ,.a > aaa0 aaa a a•- a O ,> ° CO 4.. .c Q.a _ a) W ..a U) N CO U) U) U) N L U) .c u) O L L V 0) V a) a) .r in sr -al r CO a O.,e- E e- `. O j C) a Z c v'., h pa h W C/) G > a.Co. ..) "�" ,0 N a7 p 0 0) 0 `0 Q o0 cl c .. O ... U ,0 k . "0 "c Q) 0C i 0 e cu +•. m O DO 0 0 c 0 IIilh c W • *S C V y Tn; •67alc 4.. 0 0 m > C0 0 61 co a C7 0:4 cII •0 °0 3 L a a. E aai c lo E6. h o r pI'c- 05 a) 3 Z � 0 ` N 3 > 0 C a) (a .> k Z a) cc00 O c tn 0 0 0 0 en O N W R U c`u 0 lii aa' m a• •� 3 �� m� ?a � a�i a 00 Q.. CD 0 U u. v) v) O t.a. m `. a) .c''),. 3 -c „t `.Q � `a);`c 3 aa)) Q N a N n N C o)' ' > am .0 C O C C t-; - a) -. a) n L 41= C1 Q O N w a) co .r O «• 'Q t� v1 C vi a a7 0 v C II 0 V cLo et O •• cDL Y 7 • 'C CcE _ O, 0 •+ C_ - toL • NNw00 a) . a) _. as. . . ..a) 0 ,.., zz a co G "' cQ L 0 N N U L N O C U OCL aS z u) 0 -00CD c43 ° a N C a) L7 a~ a7 a E 00o O as ,. c U a 4- 6- o p, 7 .. O NLN LL, � .-- N ° O .0 m L 'vs 3 ° w e •a co o .. • Oc owcuvu E a) c L ` ° � � o o = vo 7Va > d ` N � G �° > - m01120 = ctiOCN ,4 > O ) U = Na RO O` - N o O N ° n L z.' o o •O.• -o O 0 ° rn o O N pd Ca. .--da) -0 .30 p U y > C' i_ a) c w - N >�-. o t_ 0) «. •0 C • LO •0 Ct. co o c in �° v co 2 0 0 0 L O 3 w •C a7 a O C U -° .0 O 0 Q Q m m Uv . as a) o v32vc � � o a z C 0-O C. C.0 .0 o N 0 o N cu O E w C Oa O , ca o j o 4- ° R C al. - 0 F-. ° m -. N w a) -- .0 L U m >, '. N . C w 'c c 3 a o - >. O)•- N 'O a) 0 U N L .0 .O 0. a) O O Q 0 .) m M € C = - 0 o ° E c`o •c � m c � ° ° � U > ° ° C c w a) D > 1.. a) 0c a � O ° c o N2 o w a ° vL L°. o N a�TA .>, � o c U 0 0 d c N m w o o W 0 N N - tn 0 > m ti- ° M -C ° = Q W O O C CD- L 0 •V o w a) N of -u-, (Dg 6- N CD E ° C• .-' F. V- a) a) ,y. �_Q O N N > N •C '�.N w coo N L of - V w aU) a C C i 3 U Q C U U 0) 0 a) a) D c a) E O) co w an I- ° U a o) O a) N > C `� c 0 CO C L .3 - o .c 'C L OD L O L •c W a7 'p C p c - C O :� as -' N (0 -Nd .-- 1... 00--1)- +- . -' .-. h- .� N - -a O a•L C L N a! _O a3 a) > y U N• 0 u°i •O O a cC O U O C L ti) •CD c m .0oa) L .cc " aLN � •cE •- c ° - o ,... -°� - ,_ 00c0aNiami = E t, z H c N — a 6 as O L N 3 > 2 L E O o • c ' :II N L a7 O - m >. C1 .u2 cua 0 •0 0 w w L "C N O 6 L N w U) N 7/10 a) >4) .2 u, - .7) ....0 �. ai U D vai C 0 U a) 0 a 0- 0 0 O N N a) L •Q N a) a) a a) as co > N O a) y., a) .a s L U cs c w ›., 2•" a• 0 V 5. 0 0 as P U 0 c ,C c a) 0 - a N O L N co o 3 -" C C w 0 I- 0 o O O _ N (7) ,„, N € L o a) 0_ 0) C ,-. 00 - 0 =co E c o •o cv) n _ 5 o H-. W .� cII Q U N � .L. 0 V H = °: 0 .C.w tt -e 0 a) as C-•N - a C E L a 0w U) P- Z ac) o ao o` `o w5c 3 co 0 3 a H C vi_ 0 0 �' ccv cn `o , W aArti Q • „, , W ..•. z x O — y 0 , .r a) a tiA LU as C a o c ° = `0 >. > > ° a -. a) .� 76 tONL0E cL a1 aRO ` CU al 1.. "am A N _ O :II as N U a ° N 03 a) L O N .5 0 0 N a C-•C = o -°0 a_ d 0) Eo a) N CE ° 0)• ,_ c a) - � � o 0 C � �� a3 � cu0 a a9"-- ) «. a3 0 C C L_ us L _ A. �_ „ O C > Q O O ° _� ... N c ° o N > E O L cc o .- ) 0- a) N '- � Lw 0 Ot0 5 ca coo ..., ° � c m a) .e -- • al N 0 .0 0)-0 o ... O a C 0 >.L u € H p ° c •° 2 0 > L. C. a) CU - L t .c cII c y O) E = o 0 L p w o C -' U OL N w E >' U `. O 3 C- O o c a) c z U 0 a) C O O N °) a as ° C a) C C as � o rnali3L 0 0 . , aac O Ea. c c 3 E L o E O c cc .- mi- E . ,- rno vco ,� o NcII os C c -oN �'' C o v! > w B > U C C OO 0 .0,, >` U) C >+ 0 L = ,.a2 >.° - s aU c 03 cU 0- o wee = .c vc 03 0 -D o c >.3 O �j E , w = 0 (04- 0) �; co Q 0 0 eaw Q i` L a - 0 IT ca 0 L O E C 'a) ° a) z _1 a N o O N N C-0 0 - ... -G 4_ L 0c _ 4026 = 0 , 0 -. C. L C E ° C= as w .Qa 2 c U > 0 E > L ° ° 0 •:N-' 0 0 0 vC) a) a w 0 C w L O U ` a G� • aai v � as —°a o.� m c"ow � m N � � o 3 �r a) � ) cu � � wcw aa > a._ 70 -0 c 0. 4, -A -- 0. C4. - M °of (7) o U C o U W 1 Q 0 0 3 5 a) Oa -. ... C N O L , C/) C as •3 — 43 = = %12 = -0 mon n ° co g N C O N a) c U L U co Ci _ Oc060 m = - m, 0 - cti. a • � a�ia) ao0 �_ � oa� ocfl- Ao X.J.:21)C. C O L>.w in 3 .0 y u) '137-52 cca 0 a E a o o N c o U C L C D 0 610 co O` s N °.= >,1)- cxi -- •c0 o ma- oca o Up E = - 0 cc o` as E ` aCrLv ja U c c R > -- R a — O 0 - o a) a7 U 'U O)5 U a N co — .r as ° r .0 1, •.5 N , c1) = - 00 .= a +O. A ', as C 'O as O o C cC 0 '-6 .- c • L L '' • 0 C C N ° c g '3 a) 0 o a° ,c N aoi 0 ° 0 aUi c coo U .”-- 2 ,_ — .7, -.F. , � o o ,oL c d (U 1- c as ) CO ..r., N aU O) U � 3L CO E .6- . ° 3 � o as c -. dx was c� � NL Lam ' = ° c 0 -. ... .� ° c 2 c.) 4- L- ow a) 0 o ° ° a3) cc = - >+ 03E > al00 > ° ° o ° � NUO` ccu •� xO0 � � � 0- m >. .- .-0 0 3 c L 0 0 0 o N E a) U L ° o cCU C Q tL 0 > ` W 4. um 4 ° °a) ° c ..`_ Ern3 0 •`� c°) oya� ct > ° - U � ° moo z � O •c 'cm) 2 2 ... --8 or o c a) ) 2 - U •- .L N a) o U c cn C. Or--1- as C N N C ) O 0 0 -- _ ,_ a) c C• a N U a a U 0:.= 0 to N a 0 ti N W 0 .. -a ° o o a) y o 2 a) R 2 c N -0 O C „,1:L. 0 = c o o 0 C v0-. L C en 0 N Q ) o as 0 U a•- i_ a0 O) a • a co2 -. co .. aco -o U ■ — 0 o aOs m A Ni a E c • a 0 ++ o N_ d OL C 0 u) t, co = N w. n v1 ,� •0 m c Cu ° 0 O Vw R 0 0o „ 4, 3 m C R y .EJ a a! •w' .0 A ' O O z a -. 0 -o :8 m :Q :Q .00 � N m N m c Ca a as `E N o_ 0 � � m �, � -ca 1,... o U, ,- m Ao zZ caw c>a m N o • . „ � m 0 m 4) 0 '0 a3 o -aV W O r mp ° E .5E � coon .. . amicas . ccci3 c u, s VI ,E.-:: . . c . _ — • , c '0f_ maic`ocoo `Taco L_ € U 5 - - m N E � w •' v) c co E) -0 c aai a m ti -0 r , ' € m xL ' m CWrL Cu �. tQ C) v! cQ C70 C m m m m 4,1 co ur € 0 4 _ m of m w -0 0 �vj C N wCil m ° >. E � m •• m ,' c ••' c � t c 4..” U) . m 0 m = c co m a • . QU ,rn .. � m O `LII a) N a 3 o m I- oEa' -O � - a) 0) -0CIa)c e °)w m` aa)) 'a 't 44 u) ao a) , ( c .. ami - . � wv ai ai c c my m ° o c U o aa. o0 O 0 .. ' . 0 at o C — ' m .O — '0 m N c .mC "=• CI) E LO o a) H C,) 0 m m p cII C w• w L m r m co •0 ca a m "� O C L L >, m W m a7 •'0 = L m m .c m c o O E -0 = cf. = i w - - o) CO m , 0 .. ai 3 0) "I . m U m 0 w O 0 E 0 a/ N a m p0 , X •C .7.• ti c - .> � o `° N �03o s vi m O m 0 m e5 R - • m o 0 • t 'c ), E 0 aE) w N m 0" E a) A w 0 co .., � m � � co ` cN . 10 .. o0 < .CC i ` .CC o � E) 13 . a) . mc""o °' . m0" - miacac) ° Q•_ co n• c `� - � O E~ ca `coo >•� E0cco cco = . D � `-° Z_' c .Eca = E „ `—° Ec v w 0a' : -0 = v c 0o m cII = . ._ .'m. m �a o � � vo, a a>i m a w C Cn co � 3 m > c m 0 - . a) E R C- ctn c Ca. a) � co a CU m 7 m m m 0 m � ai C -0 ° ' E m N 0) '0 c to w w ~ L m ° TO :Fr 96 ." N 0 00. ' 0 N i-• w m ` L 0 C ..r C ° m A c m •> � cc '• cn a) .- 4 .n . . ) a) CUaa)) vUiw13 oCccu > •c E-. € cc mmmpcQ ,v) 0 - A o = . E ,� mccca• > E `a) ° m O W 0. C.-0 m co E 3 ° CML co 4 _ E L C . O m m 4) N O .. 00• N y' 2 m lav . 13 coL co c 0 ` .. m . N j � w E m m o p > 0) c CUD w: � p J � c ai m co a m m oOVs o cao � m o 2 E o' o am c c E-' a4 4 m C U U m v) m U C O .0 D O m m m O U O C a 0:1O � COf0. r• • 13 V ... 0. C.) ca . .., .. .0 O • W W 40 ME_, ti O F.) O a us cm�� a. � OQ o 44_ � Om '" °' 0) mm ° ate) a) 0) wc ._ "' ai o 0) cn �— n- E � CC — E c o o c lay ? o c m y co Az c mcocomo. O .'- m C >.� o 0 . 0Ep • ° d •6 N .. m w ° N v c� 'E m a — o a °) c 0 C • ' IL-' m u ,_.7 Cu N �, •-• ,.. m t m m 10 w m O '~ t ° c O m O co c P.. G. v C m O > 0 -0 0 .. u) -' t ca C .. 13 _ 03 c «. t� m m p N o t R E u = w .C •C 2 0017 4i m4 m C N 7.c CO O c m . - w o ` o.= t c N m m 0 N O 0 a m O C m •c U O p 0 0 z C m O t y .. m 3 0 .... (41:5170300E >.= � c m co V a) . 5 m m L m y 51 w E L cLo a) m .� cn E 0 O. C ..• fl. v m — .... . E •>. E > ` ° m o > p m 0 , m > O co 0) ° ,Q m e "- :II m . .0 �> o e cca o as u, o Q- aai u) a) = > m -m o c c .Q ` m m o .0L o m w > a1 m a ..c c 0 ° .. c. m 0 U m C a) a m O m c'' 0 cg _ m H 1_ 0-0 m c 8 a) i-' m - > > O C L 0 O 0. CII a... O ai 0).0 •m w vs 0 E a 0 E . `Q L m O N ai O a) w `4 �cQQ m W 0 f•- 0..c N m ° c ,.- E s N al E O 0) m a 0 R ami 000-` O O co 0 w w W c c u) al 13 0 •-• 1.. o m Ca "' — m m � w co 3 • cncnV o - m • C a. a: ` � °) mac_coccoo` c)r- a) sm � w � � ra°isaiami N :: m ` o � co O > N m m 'C a7 3 .c ai al C Q-.. m —4- m >,r- `' '"' C `- m 0 c O .° > U co m W 0C ` D O 73 Ltil C a co L .y m m .. O I- m w :C m e Q a• m . n' 'a U a3 w w co _ m O C 0 0 ci d 0) m > E 0 •0 as 43 E _C w m i. N i ai cp i_ E > E A O 0) u) r t r '0 m m N p ' m fl1 .9C4)Om •E > a) m cn m Ii =• � - c p "ca) ,. zz � coo °5. ..c 1:1) cm`o c)- c 3 c ° _ ami c � "' r �• r U m ,c � � c � •= -co c Qo O p = �5p.=p c co = 0 N c Z• u m E •y= O 0..0 E r 0 0 a c] 'p m• C m 1:' W Q a U t = 0 E I.0. = c u) .0. ai u) m u) 'C co O.-. d L cu O _ C c Y c II 0cc) 0 °•w m a as 3 p w as 0000- §O C 0) '" Z 0Nj co as .. ��. • c •0- 0 (71 >m C._ O m ` to .0 •C w cn m m s C .a c 'y m ' co -. =•= 3 t:)) ,.. 0 .-- m L 2` L CU O fl. "0 m N m C v) A. C7 O .. V m CO 4) .t. .., LO — c E a C C C aim m C E W = w .- C y -0w m - c .S .. m r air co m U m 1, a) co L c5 Eco .. a0i O. N >. °' a) 0 c >.L al Di in +. R m r ai V ° ai F' a, c' am o cLo R c•_ o ai N E c m m c � 0 . Vc m 0 � 0 C L . v, .a a:.:II � � mwaEi � � 3Ecaa) .. cco � 3aim � ° mmm � _' c'' w o v J .0 m CV0)0) coo o.Lc o)5c o- c � c CU m m ami mN vmi cu orp c N. < 0m oi < c.ary .. _ I- E = � w .. 02oc. 3w e- IL--• 03t3c• i3 -macco ANa¢. a) o O .a CU— c•-• N CI 'v �4 •C �II O O t Cco a) w o' mL c � L .0 c R > C oL >. ) Lw. m • 0- Oca •y 0)w _ .a •N 8 C , N O C r ° O Z • ,- ,)- 47,2).. L y N `�° 3 a) L `° `oma ° `" °'• Q C 'O •w y N :� N p_) a) t6 .O t c3 j .c U "- w w C z Z O N :) •S L y C L .y O 0 > F- E L •• N c3 O- ru C C- o o a) vl O 7A N C -a 'p ~ O m a) L _ - w-) '-y-- 2 > 0- N y .4-. N Q L L O • ° c 'Hc'�i � vi ..... °occ3ayio) E � � c � a) 4) E0." oc`um C70 I.. Q : m 7� UQ0,CVo03 r 0 a�ciaEc ° °) oo-- z o. 7C O a_ rn- o c = 0 U > ° 0-i 1II -0 0) a) ) z O C LD a) To co E "'" CD •- N N . O o w'y >CI) t a) Ni- N Q Q •C '§ co 023 .., 0- C 7w Nt •p .NU o O V � w +� = al i- ,a z c R -Q c3 3 o m c3 L LU y "- N A, O Eoc cu a) Ncc ELwc a) o ° 73 � E. ° L • — '- N > 7Z — a) .0 0-jO c3E _O 4.0 .0 O c R fua 3 �, J E Zs)la N c n � s 0- C o MOM E N c �� v Rte- v, a0-is waltj y•c m 3 rn0 m E ` c EUfn Qc6tt c3 -p o ° cca N c3i : °� a)� > o o. E L Q a) O c a) > .. `� t a) U >�Q N L 7u +0. W O O Q V coC 'U co �: 0 o- > v O w O) OL C co • (,) .. c3 O „_. N V• .0 N -p !Q (� 4)) 4) > o > a) C >.•v) G.•� C E p •O o N'C N co L c �" yN aj C tea) > Oe3La) � Noc3 3 > o0 ° .. 0-) a) 0 E� Cc0 ..... c ca - v a) a) vL .° vN v .yNrnaoNo oo 0 V) a) y • ..r ... O L `�- > a) !- C R N N >.'o U _ ` a) L C O C 0 c c o y N •ca C fl.17. L 0 O o ccuu c 'a oeco 0 ° N W Nco c a) N 73 'v ID a) c3 0 " ;C ° = to O .- -0 cu 13 I- O C •w a) c3 '`LQ II = ^✓ L O. "C 4) O. o a) O N 73 a) Q Q o ° O 4- L O. C a) N t/) .+ L > -p U 7o C N ° 0) N .+ E .•• c O .. . COC C Ca w R s ° 5 co m Q- 3 y Q� 73 a 'E 0-i -0 c c N w a) °) c o °? N 3 .0 a) 0 ti- E-4 3 >. E• E a .2 C) 4) a) >.L >C) E c9 73 � �'in- 0 -0 "" N a) Q >, ° -a 0 Z 03 4,4 C ° L — v co ■ a) �.°- >+�«- NUL 7n ° d1 ") a 7II `~ U co c c ' O w ° 0 C O w C sZ E L O y 0 y a) V CI > L 'a ° o C W 0.O y Ti (1) '4. a) o y c3 coo E E a -• N c E >, _ = y a? �u > . — o co a) ce0 ooOCLal C 3rn Na (_ cLaa� = c •EEEvN �a v) 0EVo > >OC ,...MI 1-4 W W N E C 0 3 •° C N id 0 Co 0 0 ° .y C O fl. 0 a) cu O 7z.2 Ti Q 0 ID a 0- ›-, co i_ 7Z N O E co a .- f- Q 0-f0 cal .a a o...).-.s. o CoeIL- a) .N Q a Q N OIL- o..a ate' w 0- p Q `. WF O Oc-aN 0 c a. A c a) a w L w o • 5 >+ a� .0 = .c n AZ z3 m = wL0)a) o ° � o ago 0 _ m Q C O "= ac) 0 4-• '"' L c c E L ° N L L ". rn "] ° V 7T E C N p — to 7 N L N .(s) 7.! `' O c E Q- o •0- rn > rnaai � � �' c N a.N E � E c c 0- -0 E y a) < a) -' C - C ° > _ •C w E N Q. N -o cu > .. L O. E'w OL N N . 0)w �C -ch w 11 c c E O o c c a) Co O y 3 O U L N .- C o 3 0 0 0- c y 0 I- ° y a o c3 E L ° .. U 0- := "2 o C o J m .. ° c3 U c3 L ., a) 0- .5 4-.0ii Z C N C o 3 R = L — L c "ay ni = aci 7nw .Nay co _c ° 3L — E. C 703 ¢ `� cc3 L y 0-i c tL3 R O L L c O N v_) N N L W Q c r. — o .. .. H °� 3 y ..� cu co mj E ° N 0- y L c`3 co N c3 0 .: o c := -' t ° L d 8 0 L Na� a3a) c°3 CL 77'- 70 '° '° ° o u) ac) '� E3 ° 00-07 R° - > w O C w C C X L L co) :II V C di N — E co C y L E N L cLu W J Q E > � E • ayi4) o' °)' 0)VI tr.co._ E C N O. ° VC"' -....• ul a) U °- W -� L a) 73 0 C C .- c3 "_ E C c = L E m O' yst c o Ca o al w rn w R C a) y ° E •-• •- 2 a) C U C > L L a) U c3 — •c 3 y E.. 00 cc) m n aci ac 0 "01 > OC *6 2) cn rn `L° 3 °o °-� cd c� 0-) L 7Ln � .� °� ° E .. cEccv = cLo 0730- me 0C] ° ° °--° = �c N o y y c3 O N ° .+ p) O. U L 'N a 70-p L N ° eilO 3 N U d o Q c3 73 co E a) E L — ° C cow ° `° C ted. --CU 0- N ° ° Y ` L V W . V) y = u) 0 3 0 w L a) o G. ° L C c3 c a a) ° w U .� N = 0-S N Q A C V a) = MO C`� 1 yw c m C it, Q °' cw U ° c O N c c 3 0 0 7 :� N .y 0 rn.0)w 0 w € o w: = O C 0-C) o > ° •'CU C al 0 0 Q. • L o a ca a) 0- c N .° °' E - c4- > EL o a. • (.7 ) 0) 0 - �LC00N � c (g 0 = ,- M0 wow W c3 U) c3 L 0- L t > o C I-- ° .•- a a) ° — 'a l-- a� o- 2 O L OS mo c c3 � r C 2 � c a>i cLia � o a� N o 2N ' J 'Q ' L a) I- N to ) _CoLHfl fnO.■ ■ ■ �- - QN 73LL a) a) c3 . — � QU CU - C) 0 VI Ca CN a. • w o 3 0~ _ m i� L o• . m m MI N pm 0a0oO ` O N • .4 xxxhr 130 m o , EV0 r E Ola .� -p .1-O' wyw, CCm Z .' N m Na) .. : al:1 mm � 0 U) 0 N 0 0 fmC ,c N x Cwa 13 Em 'icII5coL O V) hal ca 11 o L cC m m 5E � mC °' C n ° vf m y _ O > 'm � a : a) > z Z w0. c ? oCm . m "C E13 0 Cmoaip4 w 9 C L m 2, C cm C m 0 L "= 0m O O _ 0 • _ cm m m vO_ . ma) N U 3 c—il 0 m -, - - 0Oo c _ m 2NLNC:om 7. , p O 0 ' o . mNO¢ '+ O wQmm N ) c 7 U m wU .0 C g c U C m . m " a CwCc0 t — 0 Cw. LEU a FA• Fz mym .CU) m O •n " QLLi_ U 0 .4_, 73 w c m m 42 a. ^' o .. w, t t6 Ncm •�' 3ao Caci ° 02 :- C4t. v7c ant. i=1,� cQ a o oNoW (�CU a) cog o ., — ,� L w m y Y mLUm m V o:• 0 0 c0 >= W cu m N m U -O >r aC •am ° a0E co m m - ) N c •- w0- 03 m v) L - 4.. c0i m lc • - .c .o L m m m v O r C • O � II " N m Q __ L : -c) a)• .4 0 Y tNTo 0m C _ �- m N LC m �U O UN m Co ~an m E •cmmU•, O . c fl- 0MI m4 0-43 II O i C Hv3C O m wC m m . � m : o ` 0LLCUc > c'aU) ` ` 2 .Q � 2 m - . . imC) L m . c = 5L0mmm .. C > L _ 'OO00 U ,> 05 • pC . E L .3m546o C Cm . - LC L mO - — R W a) m m L U) ••••• ) N '5 NN a) N 0-..., a) m U-Q ,y -a - a) 0). > 0 2 .- 2mO = � ` mc0a0 0 : . , i0 -0LcRaEm .- d�'5ai m m mA• m ., ., V) 7c0 — 3 aUc Ct omO 0m D `-w � 0cm .- 03 . .- . ,." m c m . %... > . � C op = .0) oa) ._ vO ° C ° 1m cN OU IIm NO C ai c n F- f ›- U - amvi 5 .5 a) Cu m ° E 0?. .0)0m 3 = c o m 0 - ai ic E V3c 2E2 °a) p moEmc =a >,.- a� O 3m � m . � > a ° M = ac •- Fw ,..a 2 m ms .a � -0Om � OO m = Q> c0 CU L .� U 0 C ••- al >.,s, W O L - = O ° C > L . u) `O W mQ U c .5 c.) 00017 MI I- 0 . 0 ■ W .5 3- c , c GQ 1110 A F > ~'. Ll 0 . c m Y o w 0 c a. a c o m - m m m Q � E � m ) U°) n C C Cm cm � m Q >� � cqw m ° m m m m m m Cl) Or L 5 m N r C al ~ o •U m m m co l0 > O C 7 E m .0 a7 (/� a) m u) N ,U o ° •, a) 0 a N 3 'CU "� O Vi O C CU a) m U C • ^ C (A C m _ U m C .. e- C m m m C a) .0 0 c0 m to 'II o WI •� m C.) r 0 m m Cc . m O c .L., 3 al m _ m r m c0 . 0 3 UO m m m c C c c ' N m O m U m m 'D. 7:31:: N S N '- L "0 U E a) cu 0, 00 (a0 : • ' Um ..60:4) icS U • a � w v, c� i `n m mm ocva' "eU) m ' > Eo mm 'a F � Nm a) � .r '• N t) •-• � � • � o coo > 3 memo Wa rna) . m m • , m m _ Y CU C >' al (A p) - .. ° m '" m CU '■ .m- v m '■ O 0 M C a. oa m m O o c0 co w. m a) - U J m cv O W .. fn C m a) m .• , m .. l? ;II = 0 .C C •- a) F- W .1 C a) v 0 0 O O ', 0 0) O 3 0 Q 0 O �II > m > r/) m 0 -0 C m m t0 C •m a) • , •"•, ••. m• 0 0 m 0 m m O 'r NU) m a q O m .0 •-a m v) _ ` w a) m CU C m .. > , 'Q u) o 'Q C 'V) o0 3 3 • F `) cE ' cu °: m � a) � mL o co U Nmowm — om �N i . CM • u) 00 Q > O (CO cQAO 'o coc0 o C 0 3 0 s ruLa >MCc0OmDm • - 0 m p LU . 4..-'. -C CO C >. a o 0 m •p _ O '> cII vm O. a C •w. r — . 0 CU V . ~ NLmOU � "Q O.C. •5 > O CN ..I3 . o .. C C . a pe .., m m N •- m 0 m a) m = mE -0 mm ry m m , cuv) am) os ' > mC. 0 o Vm m H O C C • 3N4- 4-- s. C7 0CCL •' .• N m p 3' 0 0 4 ) N C m o t00 � OV/ = w . ■ UU ° x > 2c2> � E -0 U caOS W .nw3 E7) � Li-. cA) m 'v .- vm) o ai o o O N m � 3 ^ c ° ccl-II .° 0 . W m m m C7 w c� 0 ■s ■1 ■I of U w .a • N a a) - o .L.. L O ° O O 0 0 C as _N 0 > 1 >.1- >+-0 c . o r ,. a w 0 Y Cu v 1 1 'v) ° m .0 m c 3 ° � ° acme ` 0 3 c 3 ` z 0 0 0 0 � c m e °, � ac) U o . Cu o ° vL OZ L 3 m 2 m U R z� ° zz CC s... m= L m C 0-0 0)c m ° 0 ° ° a) 1- .0 = > N c = Cl 0 2 w o W ° D O 0 >, °C O C O m g At 0 O L U O Q E >: > 00 � "_ Sao ° a3 ° a� 3 0 CL -. 4)aUa 2 c0 oL D y EY .c m 0 0 •C am ° C N C70 ... = -0m . Y g w m lif • .4 2-w N E C .. 0 CCM3aELa) . = C ° _ .� N 0U -C ° 0.., Y >. O 0) Co ° 0 c m 0 .. rfir •Cca0 a) 0 � C) C .0Na07. m . ° r o3 -, ` 2 a0z � E > > Z y2Nt- CEE) cOa •, ° •ai ,mcN � °- o va °) 0.4 -10 ° " o - 0 0 n c80 0th * 0 - 3p o v o -- Cu � 1 C a� 0 0 0 V m g 2 7 L 9 ." 0 • . 3 ._ 0 > ° U N W W U .0. E m O 0 �Cp - ._, Tn. v01 0 ° r N 0 0 .0 0 w .. -0 - Cw O 3 mO -DQ . a aj • ' o ' 5 -O c o m ca 0 "' W 0 v -' m �a m Lv- m a� 0 r L 0 N o ow L ,c Q U v 0 •c 0 EW° ° m` R� CE ° -1 o o ': CO L°. m m 30 � c` o ' 5 a• ° 0 a3 ° 5 ° N t_ 0 -. . o 3 ° op 012. 0 p OL -13 "w m d 0 O 0 0 N 0 > 0 13 0 mo " — .9. 450 ›, c• O N 'IIa C� c..o00 ,. 0a>) 2 12. 0c0 - ; . _> Lcy � > > a) w m N a a ° 0. m c 0 0 0) 0 r m „ m 'C •L 2 p -0 ,6 _ L .. - ° N > > Y m 2. . O y O 0 E O a a.; m N > . v) N t� N 0 C 0 J w m . U a) >, 0 ) c 3 c0 — C) o o c 'C tm O m O 5 N — m0 ° . m V m m w � 'tn O O O m E. N O m o .Q >. c � C > 0 . .. ali t c •.N -. ° � 0 Z > r- , a) ai ° at •° ccu 3v) o c — ... t � E -c ..t = W 0 m N ... 3 43.10.... O N '� m „, ,,, m5 ,... .0 0u) Oa ` mf c . 0 a NH= 0wE _ L ._ o e ° �u m a.F- 2 .0 = W 0 � ° 15 ' < a- 0 0 0 c ° v ° E ' • a•w voi .c0 - -•' O 2 W ,.a C �Y o ° ° o � c3 0 o m E D •E ° c ° -a �0p (DEO E” 41.4w 0I � 0c°) � H -a2 a.mO arLN0 .0 CCa IL- = n o2 H ° p CO 1:44..] A • W CA H O a . 0 a • m0 C O ° NN C V a .- 0 )_N Cu Com 0Cc co NoU d A ° a) a) mC 0w00 0 0 -0 33 ocn ae P.) 0 '� 0 -000 . " a ° ° N at, o o m •- Cu - : 0 a) 0 co 0 Y y 0 :)c -c .. 0 ° -0 = = E ._ EN m L o ° o ° m m 0 .0 ., ov oaf ;° r c > o • v:10 - -6 Ca -L c.) . 0 .5 . 2 02 m N a .5 °� o o ° N E c� .c ° mvo�pv > o c -, 0 > oz . a) r .i0 0 co F- cQ �-- t (nVaO 0 L o ° C N "0 a F.. W c o c os ;L - r cam .- a? c C Cu c 3 - ~ z4 C 0 0 'Q r .t.' ,10"- ' in- '-' 00 0 0 ° - 36 .a Cl) a) 0 le m e 0 U N 0] x - �— a - 1,e — 2 . E = O 0 Q, L4 000)1° : -0 ° -- c i E w O w ism ° N 0 "' c - . 0 C 0 U C O C L a) 0 O .J > ` N N � Ct •° •. — V V y Cl) � m > a) cv � � 2 W ] O C V m . .. a) M �O E m ° .0 C -0 c 'O m • Cu 0 .O f0 m w _ • L I- A O 0 = m N 0 Z' O V ° O NII « E 0 c a • N cp Cu _ awv 0 " E ° 3 -aoai a> 2 ° °- cN '> ° a) = vi � .c [..1 t... Rai nN a) aXR ° NQ0 0X � � 0oo i0c0Z JcZ �3 o . a) o o °) 0).N Cu = r OaN • O) am a>) L - "C C U U rxy ( O ° L -- ° Cu C ° C Ce ° C L 'II ` ° c0 C W a; a) wz w0 50 � c0m � 5o ac - cu 00 = ° � 'a0 0 y � � 3 Z ¢ ° 30 v ° 3 . Cu -- - cm — a) d3 0 => . mym ° zui mNZ'� mN " N � O ° 0 ' os Oy- m ', •1xII 1.- (a E .� r = 0 t 0 0 c L R 0 o C w O o > .° L m O w w >._> O m o a O ° m m N 0 C ° � u c Z '40 3 0 a) '� Cu 0 _ 0 7 C_ m C 0 o E a ° a� > • U .X ° •N O� N o0 _ 3 N "X me 0a)' a) = ° 3 -aafsc " o `oc�u3 " Nc 7) " .° afII . Q) � CW7 0 0 ° '5a30 • 0a. ° a) cu30 - tiE '5 ° • a' 0 am 2E 00 ~ .= ■ m .Qm . 0 • ■ m < .a . oomE. ,- . • ... ONa • ON el y o mu) as ON n C N w O m ' N O N N o C t N. v1 m m3 ,m� � � w ai Em omLcNOCm 0 0 .0 Ea c EEm ■ � � °'> � pco cc - EEo Z ow N n. > °� mw �' a) u) v � caL acme vs � asU m o m o aco . �' Qc � " 0 = o N •c ,� 0.13 d , - m en a 01--....E .8- c o 0 c c ca LLL U .a �a c o - o o >,La).. ° mcc in OLm' •C = 4. . ° m w N � m N c c � "- 3 0 = � C7p� to 'D O > = as ' 'CJ ° m _ L 4 n c � ca c � °' 3 c a) -• aci � � a € C m o aa)) c 24- ") o L a0 mL c = °) E .ca. m a ca 0-13 E 0 2 , E w cr 2 o) oc o 3 a 2 c, 3 m o as o 'C (1) 03 `-' 000• 0 as a• Ey 0 m ` 4 as 4 ON " .. � '• ca. 0JL. ca cu m a > � = f° = W a4 c) 0 0 cw c o 0 cL o' o � � a cr 0) > o c m c ° E 0 3 m N :y m m o °s r o as L_ ^Lm. o " c �° c°n C CII > `� PC w 0 1- c m o 03 m C O C « = C cII ,..0 c C N N ' N E i'- L _ C• ca. J+ G. E m m ca m , . m o " 'O -0 'ca m= cal «- m C '- m O ° m rU E",,, CU Q m C C co" >. a ' 0 ..,, a c m E 0 :. w 0 = 0. N O E L U -EL Ce E � .� � m � � m vi .amo0 0cF �I.� ° ¢ 7 � Z L. 'o s ,° � °� U ma ° c o o �•� o C .E.• u) m �° � •� �' �_ °fc �. y • c .5 >. �,� � 'cwc--, E ° 0 a > s " " oL 0 u) E a) ccaa c mem ° c aN) ° 'y a 1- 2) a. ° cnA ... ' . m• m �' 3 O O V L L C �?� L O E-, 0 m m CE ._ m 'L.? ca O p ca �. Cu �' ca Z as cam• N -,..,41) = co E 2r . m a c N aC N mem C O 0 0 a c c O > ca C W c6 > m 0 L • O 2) as m N m e :6 'C3 C c w >- 2 c m p E " �C m �. ..: E N w m E ' v) .- U 0. m O p m w E-4 0., a ° E o a 0 c U .. m• L m c L .c O C N C rn c p as N E x W O N •a. C N O 0 5 .0 2 N •• LL m - a L N .v) m al m a N = E. O ; p 0 CU 'c L 0 co m m as go O .0 j. C 0 .c ,- = a C en N 0 .c ....7; L. go >. ... Em ■ acu) caca .0Nm NHLNOa c\1Q - 0 .'213 .0a0ca A Ag LT.1 II! Fe O z6 3Ll Lo .. m 'Q o xaaCNc - ca °' m 'cw 8a r ° c mLa ° � m "° owc c mm 5 m .0 aN m . " cw0tE" U w C -) ° cIIc ~ X.-: a _U.)N �¢ O. c i" (5 o cc mEc w m N ' c mo O- a. -- ' as 0) a- c3 -0 .. .4 ON y> o L mC0ca >: c c °'occ a ° y 113- 414) 2 cZ. o > ca a 03 0. C al .11,L 17 E NmmcE .Soam -C c.a0N 00 . - N -a .. cm Nmp "' E ° r. aoca (I) = caE -0 ° ° c"n ° - .nas c � 0a- ° " E ommoo c.) c.) mem tic >+ cL NL aci .� 0..0 .0 3 rn ca ° ca o NU am rn� Emm € > v, s .rEc�a N � R � c memos? cmimc 0r3RI0 L) 0...c m m -0 . as a .0 L L ,- «• "' w m ._. 0 .0 ca 0- a) C a) E" � 0 - 0.-0c cu " Ncn 0 e0 .... LNca -- Q w.ccox Z a_ p cQ cam O a.-.S 3 c a EL m � m N � ca U m1 m wa mm � � � o ° eco >79- ° `-° - >. N ... N -0woEo cu maa) aa! aC _c o caa •NU c Oa m ac .0 as 0 0 0) ° .c a) .c C Ow op co w« _> a1II o CA o .0 c .ar m c ,- iso o "_ en 0 wa g a. 0 0 .c ca •C a v_, L 000 = 4) c 5 'N a 3 ~ v) ° . C �. w m NL c 3 N a ..- 12 c as C C ca m R a3c 0 a) ° > > 3 0 = Q g. •• o ,._ 3 . c o 3 0 p " ac) L w c... .Q R) R •N c 0 ° C Q c 0_ m m - ° 0 . y co 0 :.. N .- C E Q E w O N cam) a) � .0 2 °- E �a �__ o E a ca cc >+'c� > al := 13 ° m m c cn anf mL ca >• U ..• cn a 2 0 o -0 N '0 0 ' a) cUa x °- a) w N L 3 'cm- Lill cmi a° cNa tn oZ J3' E w >" as C a, Lw ° m2 mv � c m m m.o c m m " m m m L W m RL E ¢ W R a_ o o > L o � c c C 3 L c m 0 c°i c c •? o _ .° c � " 0 3 as V m = :00t5 ' - -ca 0 0 0 m -O a c m o s L .2 d • ad a) 0aiw_ >4.- 0cu >aa ¢ oE ° Lma °) 0 - ° ° .� � C Tu. ° °a) c O O c m C .� O `6'. m C ° O L ° N C N > 9 -0 N a) C >' O '0 N C/) �-. E E o voi a ° w m ,- y o am 0`ao c -0 2 co ca •c N c .. .0 2 a�iw o ° W = fs, E N =c c7 Olt .0 U amvw ca c o p aC •v Z ? O a r vs � � o '� o v, m m '� 'E � m �en 0 ° � � °� E L a. E o> � Nw a c-, r ■ " L ° L N m cr p m c ,_ 0 as a ca 0 L CLQ 4: p ° N c L as m a. 3 n Q ¢ 3 ° aU .-Te �. a� m �. ■ I- a.SE = a) ca ■ t- 03ca 0ova C U N N 0 w 3 Cu• n O v! N v1 oLd CU o co — .. o N OZ 0 c -a N C o- •" 0 n z z 0 = o a) co0 0NaO vC N j E I- Ca CLN 03 U 4C N .0 o N CwC a >� 0 lN ' wCV0- o oc ,D00 v)o8 ° c o oU 0N € Z. - I > - -) .cN —. m 0U -) L �5 0)- c ..a0z os et) a-co .41 -, � m os NC aE'" O L C C N N L C v) vl N 0 O V •V C/1 0 01 > to U y (17 L N N C C N A W O cofit t_ Z 0 L • 0 C .,..., N N O 0_ 3 d H ,_ nfl- c ca) ) m � aELo0o • Z O ° eco C° cr' C Uc� °- aa)i � ° o OS co o 7 Z - cc 0 E.Q.. > > aa)i 0 >+ `L° Z w m�Q0 0 w - N .._ No �.. 0f UC C. N v! U) (0 4... -) a) .c ° C ,_ > .� CNCe boa Wo .0 - - — 0 A 0 0 o L Z CO N Cu O N �. N E-, O C C U 3 .0 W C L as C � Z C � NN > INC) LL O NCU) Oop O N I L O 'J." " v.. (D 0. C N N v) C 0 U ::. .� '0 N 0 E-. A.� •C ur- 00 -0 oC J W rno � � w? ao C4 O a a) ) C) C _L = aN) F- Z L O o 9 U -0 E� Ocac ` o H oa °' ° � � CO ›"aw N Z oc ° 0RoW = moILE -, Cl) U Ort0c) a0 A •v) A > O � z "- >. �+ a. a. W O 03 != N b' caw c4 C a w v`C, "- C) 3 L w = L 'Q C C cII .. c0,C 0f+• e} p h C O C N O Az ur N c L � o cid N C °' otv) y ,a) -Y a o C o ° arc ^ d Q.� .0 01 o ,C V C N N w .a W 0 ,z a 11 O tea) 0 a) ,C y ` U 2 '"a >+ m C v! N ... N C v y ,, 0 0 C us •'C -c aa) i O.0 4 0 a a1) 0 = Cw yw Nom•- � a) z � C W �? � .a� y m w ', o U c o o = 0 '3 o a) y a�ii -c a) La 0 3 ar � �1II - • a-0 -3 o° a a°) c c y C3 E m .: ° a) tt C N 0 0U mI- =.(-) `c.a? '°'C y a) c°') $ N 'czcco c°,LI caC > 101h911 E-- NN 0 CD a) a) oV °- Nis U) C W W C Q v) .7. w N N N ~ 0 Z a O .. ..2 ° -0 r) O U 0) c -.i a v) N 3 Z .c ,� ., co ° Et L . CCa, a, a) r� CO) — o 3 N C C W 3 0 a1 ,� y 'tt y I,p p N .,� a a3 ,� y v O W — o N N w p U) O >, C ch O C a) Y 03 O ° U t ;.; N a) W _ c LU v woc oo •rL � .S � cO• „0cp � .� a) ,C • > v] LL- Qo w e c 0 - w o ` U ° 0 mt i Off.,.co C -Y 03 4- o W O N = ° 'a o L j a L o cj o C j y C O as G 0 0 © c a>i c " o N 3 0 3 y ( C a0i t �Q"' 0 a0i 4- c0i U E C O ca O (-) N y W .. a) a) to cO C N v) 2Z y ° N Z � Cu L CU .0 E 'L N E- may. y O a) m O O 0 co 0 O c .. v, c v, � � m > aL) v) 3N mte 0 � 2 a oZ 3 � C •; A Owl N — 03 c a � a) '� �..Cc � a, o W >•. L Ncca >,•c Zoo O C) ov) d � o) `II ,� ov) 3 = yva e > oao 3 N cca u' o w ° v) o � aZ tr)L or O � � �a cu :•:)- d > Q N L O _ L _.- LN N O m O 3 o 03 C Q7 •0 N i 0 = 0 0 O^ 0 W a C7 -- • 0 0. > +- C = w J ISP) S. 0 3 V O• � 4u 0 a Q +„ •O � � vlw 2oN Cc C c4= Cu Q ' w ° 4ca) 0) N c aya°ia) maiZa 0) zoo N oZZ c MEW C 0) rn > V a := O C = � Z ,- w a) C � .c .c '. C = O s o L C y h F� 3 L L 0 ° O • ti N N „ C m ,Z „ 0 a) -ca CI. C C a) O ,� �Oi . c > . m zNLN.. Q. .V N _a .. 0Z CC0)� y oC. N o w .0 C C NL N C N Y f_ a y IL- v0. cq O W y co 0 U .0 Z y 0 L N a c6Ow I 'NI t O "" `" O 110 I- 1s 41 0 IU a) o oz y w0 w 0 , = U � EU air 0 U a OO� 7_'m G7 ..1) C O C .0 o H c O d c ypcg <40 F. CD - E0" � a Q F. !n W 13:1•, U t o CI) V Q- ui (0 U a o cc 3 U = 0 0 v U F y- 4) `c° R Z w La LI E o` ` w c >Z Z 2O0 A WOO o } cO 0 E-• a O W HZ o c ...- w wWa, -- o 0 w %.., j: iiwQ u) U I-- ,ovU go cn A� Q o - 3o a A m w � � . 0 c wo y 0o a • a03 . a U) C0 C1C0 = as — L � 0 a) a " 47 m � 3 c. o' o - � .. m - O C ` QN cc O v- C p • 'C V c CO m Q e- a) cv''r R V va) O coVta � a �N O a) v a m Ci = xwm •- V X cm E N c � � E. W y >. OW 0 rI 1:7- CO nz al � u) cv0o 0 ° � coL w d a � m -0. ooLaG oa ` ai 2 a '' •c > mc7311-4oO W .U"' a yma aw r Noa ( a ° CU U 0 0 Ao s = U coax a) •Cw0 wo o '16 0:1 ca .COU �c g N0E Q � 0 c oLoa W c` Z o > c s ca O w = L0O 03 °- � * -0 cl) 0 u) coasw � Z 3 s w DQ ai 5 U co �d d I _ w 0 � N w 0 0 o L a a . Z° C7 q 2 c �,U aL w V J w ill in y y a) a) yCI, O w 0 • I'- ttCC L z - 3 0 O et .� tC LL. JIifS 43 17; li -E -EgLA 0 Ia N � N ti N w UU 0 oco a.c O p C7 — 0 N coQ N ad.. . . I Aza u.] 0 z .• .1 • • , . • , / .• / .. • ' / ,• • ./:o• /... /• / --• , •-, ,... ,.. ....., ../ ../ ., , • -- ..a i „ C . .• / //I .• / / - i 1 1 - _.._._ CIO '4••• , , - , ! •,,:\ L / ,-- -- - / r; • . 2 / / .ii ;--. • ., _____,........... s 3,3 . . , ..., ... .„,-.„, _"-,,,,, ,,• 3 „ , , • / 3/ , • . ,. . . .. i, ., / ..„ • 3 13: , ,. , . .3 r /„ . / ,v>7, ._,_, rio.::.... " 0,; :,.. ..• I . , • . ..„'. C 4.1 2 , ..• /. . .-^/: i" al".tz 12 , e ./ //'..' "' ' 3 . . • / i• i .• , _ . .,'"",..Y/ • -%- — Ci 1- fs Z —4-r.•' - 2//IL" 4, .•%' • I t44 / ../.. tt , . . 1 • ' ; WO . •.. / • , / .„ 4- ---'.-Y• - 0. _ . / • // a . ' __. it. • ' ... • • / ,, / • s /- I 9t,r- , . - / ., / 4 I • , . • •'P / t . 0..." • - (_ „...- 4111%.' i 4.0 . '..../ I '-- tzt, '''''' i\ -.! • li,Q„ 1 - / c.. •11'' ; , 'I • t. ef .‘• l', ' ..... N. 1 1 '.1. • • i . 1==k ' /,' ib . . -/ • .. - < a .4• s' 2,116.i 411h. i A, re / '-::'.,-„, C= ,,,•,',!./kr, , ' -,-.; .21- ,_, / ..\ ..;, , •,, ",:::; 3 A, 'it % • /or.,. ... ... ,,, (-yrs 4,441. /..„ -----N I if i '-• '" , 4.-- 4, ry-AV - :c, 0 t• , ., C=I '-', ! W ..:i‘ \'N •-- ' -.,...4.,_• -•/-4, --,. ....; '.),. 1=IC 7j,,---___/-,, \.\. .--•.......!-- 7 0 "II\ /0 / i•® -N \ 1 -. 'at i '.. ,f Clog) m.f... NY', '"'••• .!•••••-. ., •:..•," c's . ),,,,,•....,,,,,.....•\-••\! , t t eq=1; • ij\\..-,- --•-t. ""-----"---- ...._.... ,! 310 '.' ,:'tifV.:. -:" -\OD'•:- 1.:t2:!,...-'t ______ / N...---- .1*--- i------ . ,. .. „- -_______ .. _ -7:4547-1—agir-6-eJ_. s - CI.) 11 ' - -–— ,.. •••., ------::–.--. -A....... ......, '' '----. 7=--- ---•-•7=- ..- .._,- ..--rit. ----`. : 41.1, ..., ...... .., ......, 1 1*. ..........V ''' . i: -----.–__ : ! •. -e--- 0 1....•..–.., VICIC —.= •I• •I• •• = ! AzseiSEI'JMEMORANDUM A ST PAUL,MN MINNEAPOLIS.MN 72 ST CLOUD.MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI 1 MADISON. WI TO: Ms. Pamela Sheldon, City of Mounds View FROM: Glen Van Wormer and John Hagen DATE: May 9, 1997 RE: Review of Site Traffic Impact Analysis Proposed PUD at Silver Lake Road and TH 10 Mounds View, Minnesota SEH No. A-MOUND9701.00 The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize our review of the March 19, 1997 traffic impact analysis prepared by Biko Associates, Inc. for the proposed development at Silver Lake Road and TH 10 in the City of Mounds View. • Trip Generation The trip generation volumes presented in the March 1997 report are generally within range of those presented in the ITE's Trip Generation Manual. The gas/convenience store is shown to generate approximately 1,900 trips per day. Super America stores with 8 pumps and 4,000 square feet generally draw higher volumes. The other trip generation calculations are also at the low end of range for ADT, but the p.m. peak hour is reasonable. The 58 percent"pass-by"trips for the gas/convenience store in the p.m. peak is reasonable based on studies and experience; however, all trips generated by the development will impact the driveways and almost all will affectthe turning at Silver Lake Road and TFI 10. The p.m. peak hour volumes used in the report's analysis are on the conservative side since pass-by trips were not factored into the fast food volumes and no multipurpose trip reduction was applied to the gas station, fast food or the office volumes. Distribution The directional distribution of the site generated traffic appears reasonable. We would expect more trips on Silver Lake Road and more from eastbound TH 10 than westbound TH 10, primarily due to access to the site. The general direction and volumes seem reasonable. i Ms. Pamela Sheldon May 9, 1997 Page No. 2 1111 Analysis No volumes at the driveways are provided. Using trip generation and distribution, additional traffic and changes in traffic due to pass-by at Silver Lake Road and TH 10 were calculated. These were compared to the volumes presented in the capacity analysis made for the "No-Build Existing" and "Build Development" scenarios. Most of the volumes are reasonably close. We concur that little change will occur during the p.m. peak hour. The a.m. peak should have even less impact. The analysis of the"Build Development: Driveway D"is puzzling. Volumes on page 1 of the print- out show no outbound left turns and very low traffic on Silver Lake Road. Silver Lake Road ADT is 5,700 south of TH 10. Northbound volume in the Silver Lake Road/TH 10 analysis is 350 in the p.m. peak hour. Our calculated driveway volumes are 65 westbound right turns, 16 westbound left turns, and 97 southbound left turns. These volumes differ significantly from the volumes used in the report's analysis. Therefore, a new driveway analysis is needed. We have a concern over the southbound left turns from Silver Lake Road to Driveway D. We calculate a northbound stacking at 9 vehicles in the p.m. peak for a back-up of 225 feet. The northbound vehicles will also be "metered" from the 4-way stop at County Road I. Therefore, gaps will be tight for the southbound left turning vehicles. • Due to the heavy eastbound volumes on TH 10 in the a.m. peak period, we also believe that there is a need for the report to provide an analysis of Driveways A and B, during the a.m. peak hour. Site Circulation There have been some on-site circulation concerns which have been identified. The fast food exit conflicts with the car wash stacking, and the fast food entrance conflicts with the car wash entrance. Further complicating the entrance to the fast food and car wash is their close proximity to Driveway D. The car wash stacking is also not clear. It appears that the geometrics of the common drive are tight, particularly for delivery vehicles. There will likely be a need for right turn lanes to each of the proposed TH 10 entrances. We have concerns over whether Mn/DOT will allow three driveways along TH 10. An option may be to combine the east two driveways. The proposed five driveways along Silver Lake Road are a lot. It may be possible to combine the senior housing to one or two driveways. There does not appear to be any provision in the site plan for trash removal at the gas station or deliveries to the sit-down restaurant. • Ms. Pamela Sheldon May 9, 1997 • Page No. 3 In order to further analyze the driveways, we believe that the report should provide on-site volumes. Further analysis also needs to be performed at Driveway D;particularly the northbound stacking and the southbound left turns. There may be a potential for the southbound left turns to the gas station/fast food to back up towards TH 10. We appreciate the opportunity to review this traffic impact study on behalf of the City of Mounds View. If you have any questions or comments regarding this review,please do not hesitate to contact Glen Van Wormer at 490-2045 or John Hagen at 490-2195. sah° c: Rocky Keehn, SEH F:\PROJECTS\MOUND\9701\M EMOS\SHELDON.509 • i : Biko Memorandum :e :.. Associates, III Inc. �T = ', ~= DATE: May 15, 1997 :7: TO: Jim Erickson, City of Mounds View ': Glen Van Wormer,- ormer SEH ---:,.,,--,.:7).1..-.7 John Hagen, SEH _:ter --. ,0,, FROM: William Smith, AICP ,"• .," ` . RE: Proposed PUD at Silver Lake Road/Highway 10 '. Response to Comments r Upon receipt of comments on the traffic study from SEH, Biko Associates has prepared this .-..- !.--,4;,,,,__-,„_ memorandum outlining responses to issues that were raised. The SEH memorandum to Ms. :.-; :-'-1-15;-- Pamela Sheldon (dated May 9, 1997) raised the following issues and comments: • :` Trip generation - SEH is in general agreement with the trip generation analysis WIKEK' ' ''`. presented in the traffic study. SEH is in concurrence with Biko Associates that PM III •skr=a-' ,', peak hour volumes shown in the trip generation analysis are conservative because they do not account for: 1) pass-by trips for the fast food land use and 2) multi-purpose trips —mrw.-� between on-site uses. • Trip distribution - SEH is in general agreement with Biko Associates that the trip '" r distribution presented in the traffic study is accurate. There is some concern on SEH's =�= part that more trips would be distributed along Silver Lake Road, but felt that the trip !. distribution is reasonable. • Need for AM peak hour analysis - Before conducting the original traffic study, - guidance was sought from Mn/DOT and Anoka County. Biko Associates was informed by both agencies that an AM peak hour analysis would not be necessary and that the PM peak hour analysis would be sufficient. • Site circulation issues - Two site circulation issues were identified by SEH. Concern over these issues indicates that SEH is not familiar with how the development's use will operate. These two issues include: . - conflicts between fast food and car wash traffic - delivery truck circulation Fast food orders are proposed to be made at the rear (south side) of the building, and6 fast food pick-up is proposed to occur along the east side of the building. Therefore, vehicles in the fast food lane will be forced to drive around the building and will not block the area where car wash vehicles are stacked. Not shown on the site plan are flexible stanchions that will be installed as a traffic control device to separate fast food Community Planning and Development.Environment/Energy.Community Organizing.Land Use.Transaortation • Jim Erickson Glen Van Wormer John Hagen May 15, 1997 Page 2 and car wash traffic and to ensure that fast food vehicles continue to the east side of the building. Car wash customers will be required to park their cars, enter the convenience store, and purchase a pass, before queuing in the car wash traffic lane. They will not be permitted to enter the car wash traffic lane without a pass. This addresses the concern that there will be congestion at Driveway D where fast food and car wash traffic would interface. Delivery trucks will not use the Common Road and will make deliveries to the front door. • Provisions for trash removal - The developer feels that the location of trash storage facilities can be addressed in more detailed and refined versions of the site plan. It is appreciated that on-site circulation will require ample room to accommodate garbage trucks with 12 foot to 15 foot wheel bases. • Number of driveways on Silver Lake Road and need for right-turn deceleration lanes for driveways on Highway 10 - Anoka County commented on the number of driveways proposed for Silver Lake Road. This number has already been reduced from five to four by eliminating one of the driveways serving the senior citizen residential use. Future versions of the site plan will reflect this revision. Mn/DOT was asked about the need for right-turn deceleration and right-turn acceleration • lanes on Highway 10, both before and after completion of the traffic study. At a meeting held with Mn/DOT on April 16, the agency commented that deceleration and acceleration lanes would not be necessary. • Driveway D - There is disagreement between SEH and Biko Associates on operations at Driveway D. The traffic study did not present traffic assignments, and SEH, therefore, had to review computer print-outs (presented in the Appendix of the traffic study) to determine driveway volumes. The traffic study (and Appendix) reviewed by SEH is an early version of the report. Revisions were made to traffic assignments after the original traffic study was submitted and revised intersection capacity analyses were conducted. Because reported Levels of 110 Service for the intersections did not change between the original and revised capacity analysis runs, no mention was made of the revised traffic assignments. Jim Erickson Glen Van Wormer • John Hagen May 15, 1997 Page 3 Revised work is presented in this memorandum to demonstrate forecast operations at Driveway D and calculated northbound and southbound stacking. Figures 1, 2, and 3 illustrate traffic assignments for the road network under existing, site-generated, and proposed build conditions. Tables 1 and 2 on the following page, show exisiting and proposed traffic assignments. Traffic assignments for the intersection of Highway 10/County Road I were not included on Figures 1, 2, or 3. Biko Associates was advised by Anoka County that this intersection did have to be analyzed in this study. Revised intersection capacity analysis computer print-outs for Intersection A (Highway 10/Silver Lake Road) and Driveways D and E, under the proposed condition, are also included. As presented on the capacity analysis computer print-outs, these three intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable Levels of Service and intersection delays. At Level of Service C, overall intersection delay at 19.1 seconds per vehicle, and with northbound delay calculated at 22.9 seconds per vehicle, the minimum storage length for northbound vehicles is 225 feet. As stated in the traffic study, 170 feet for stacking is available between Intersection A and Driveway D. An additional 160 feet for northbound stacking is available between Driveway D and Driveway E, however; for a total of 330 feet of stacking. According to the Highway Capacity. Manual, the stacking distance for an unsignalized intersection, such as Driveway D, should accommodate the average number of vehicles expected to use the lane in a two minute period. As shown in Table 2, 58 southbound left-turns are expected to occur at Driveway D during the PM peak hour. According to this criterion, and providing 25 feet of stacking distance for each vehicle, a minimum of 50 feet will be needed for queued vehicles. As stated 170 feet is available between the Highway 10/Silver Lake Road intersection and Driveway D. • If queued northbound vehicles block Driveway D, Driveway E will be open. As shown on the site plan in the traffic study, Driveway E provides access to uses proposed for southeast corner of the Highway 10/Silver Lake Road intersection. As explained in the footnote to Table 2, none of the southbound Ieft-turns to the proposed gas station/car wash use were assigned to Driveway E. Instead they were all assigned to Driveway D. Without any of these southbound left-turns assigned to Driveway E, the worst case condition at Driveway D was assumed for the analysis. • • • Jim Erickson Glen Van Wormer John Hagen May 15, 1997 Page 4 TABLE 1 PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXISTING CONDITION • Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LOCATION L TR L T RL TRL TR Intersection Ax 34 995 72 19 1838• 27 158 187 5 17 55 15 Driveway Dill 15 - 36 - - - 17 333 - 47 99 - Driveway E - - - - - - - - - - - - • ! Based on turning movement counts taken on 3/12/97. Source: Biko Associates, Inc.; 3/19/97 . TABLE 2 PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS BUILD PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Eastbound j Westbound Northbound Southbound LOCATION L T RL T RL TR L TR Intersection A 34 1045 90 99 1838 27 222 195 24 21 58 15 Driveway D 15 - 36 11 - 54 17 370 11 58 141 47 Driveway E - - - 12 - 36 - 362 12 40 148 - Note: None of the trips destined to or leaving from uses proposed to be located on the southeast corner of the Highway 10/Silver Lake Road intersection were assigned to Driveway E. All of these trips were assigned to either Driveway A or Driveway D. ioSource: Biko Associates, Inc.; 3/19/97 Jim Erickson Glen Van Wormer4111 John Hagen May 15, 1997 Page 5 SUMMARY Responses to issues raised by SEH in its review of the traffic study for the proposed Highway 10 PUD are summarized below: • Trip generation - SEH is in concurrence with Biko Associates that PM peak hour volumes shown in the trip generation analysis are conservative because they do not account for: 1) pass-by trips for the fast food land use and 2) multi-purpose trips between on-site uses. • Trip distribution - SEH is in general agreement with Biko Associates that the trip • distribution presented in the traffic study is accurate. • Need for AM peak hour analysis - Biko Associates was informed by both Mn/DOT 11111 and Anoka County that an AM peak hour analysis would not be necessary and that the PM peak hour analysis would be sufficient. • Site circulation issues - Unique site operations need to be considered when evaluating on-site circulation. First, fast food orders will be taken on the south side of the building and will be picked up on the east side. Flexible stanchions will be installed to channelize vehicles in the fast food lane to the east side of the building and to prevent lane changing between the fast food lane and the car wash lane. Second, customers wanting to use the car wash will be required to purchase a pass inside the building before queuing in the car wash lane. They will not be allowed to drive directly to the car wash lane from Driveway D. Third, all deliveries will be made to the front door, and delivery trucks will not use the Common Road. • Provisions for trash removal - The developer feels that the Iocation of trash storage facilities can be addressed in more detailed and refined versions of the site plan. • Number of driveways on Silver Lake Road and need for right-turn deceleration lanes for driveways on Highway 10 - The number of driveways on Silver Lake Road has already been reduced from five to four. This revision will be shown on future versions of the site plan. Jim Erickson 1111 Glen Van Wormer John Hagen May 15, 1997 Page 6 Mn/DOT has informed the developer that right-turn deceleration and right-turn • acceleration lanes would not be necessary. • • Driveway D and northbound and southbound vehicle stacking on Silver Lake Road- There is concurrence between SEH and Biko Associates that the intersection of Highway 10 and Silver Lake Road will operate at an acceptable Level of Service under the proposed condition. Without the revised traffic assignments for this intersection and Driveways D and E, however, SEH was not aware of how operations might occur at these locations. The minimum stacking distance for northbound vehicles is 225 feet, and the distance between the Highway 10/Silver Lake Road intersection and Driveway D is only 170 feet. Driveway E, which serves the same uses as Driveway D, is 160 feet south of Driveway • D. This combined distance provides 330 feet for northbound vehicle stacking, and if Driveway D is blocked by stacked, northbound vehicles, access to the site can take place at Driveway E. According to the Highway Capacity Manual, the stacking distance for an unsignalized intersection, such as Driveway D, should accommodate the.average number of vehicles expected to use the lane in a two minute period. As shown in Table 2, 58 southbound left-turns are expected to occur at Driveway D during the PM peak hour. According to this criterion, and providing 25 feet of stacking distance for each vehicle, a minimum of 50 feet will be needed for queued vehicles. As stated 170 feet is available between the Highway 10/Silver Lake Road intersection and Driveway D. 1110 ---Icir---- -7 -% 0 -3 /(°9_, , ' 4e as74 k -?•4 A?, 0 ' ,ftc -"Zi. in .4>4%No Jo vii0\1, .1,:, rt Iii e4t6I't, `/,' ‘7 i ' Y Z 2. ) 471, w o 2001 0 ici : 1 4 M 1 �� i (1\ 4;7 ,a 4 Z2/7\\ 0 . 7 \ mow /. ...1 n (T.F7 vi/6 \%14 09\ 0 4ii IS‘41 - / A, AL\,72,4/4" ‘ '4Prr)4 `' d'' ti '` \,Z iSib; j4N Tg - (0 ,,Nt V j/ 7nZ .. ,.1 a /k we ),40/1\) ,„, r 4 v 4) ‘6:24v 411‘i\W a\\) Q\ —.4 Z '"�� 2 -y �zsg 'N �°I� chi 37-..-y".. /� •?j 'o /---tn 2 i ,_,j ,,, ,\--ir /e ' IN / 4 y A,x el ce eiPt`6 4), 2S6 " i � 6-1 �yw 0I i 1110 . 0 3 -ic V )/ , o\ 4Ao 1 -4 4/1:) t3 x ii 4)\ r 2, ii, /4, ,?' /2 x 4 tp A , =I 4,14 cx ni ....__,_4 z in z HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Center For Microcomputers In Transportation III Streets : (E-W) Highway 10 (N-S) Silver Lake Road Analyst : Wm Smith File Name: BUILDSLR.HC9 Area Type: Other 3-19-97 PM Peak Comment : Build Development Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L TRLTRLTRLTR No. Lanes 1 2 1-- -i-- 2- --1--�- --�-2--<- --�- -- - -;-- > 2 < Volumes 34 1045 90 99 1838 27 222 195 24 21 58 15 Lane Width 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 .0 12 . 0 12 .0 12 . 0 RTOR Vols 20 15 10 10 Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds • SB Right * *EB Right WB Right Green 10A 51A Green 24A Yellow/A-R 5 5 Yellow/A-R 5 Lost Time 3 . 0 3 . 0 Lost Time 3 . 0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group : Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L 1881 226 0 .16 0 .12 30 . 0 D 10 . 7 B T 3960 2099 0 .55 0 .53 10 .3 B R 1683 892 0 . 08 0 .53 7 .5 B WB L 1881 226 0 .46 0 . 12 32 . 2 D 23 . 3 C T 3960 2099 0 .97 0 .53 22 . 9 C R 1683 892 0 . 01 0 .53 7 .2 3 NB DfL 1639 426 0 .55 0 .26 25 .4 D 22 .9 C TR 1972 513 0 .43 0 .26= 20 .2 C SB LTR 3193 830 0 . 11 0 .26 18 .2 C 18 .2 C Intersection Delay = 19 .1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C S 111 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 1 • AREA POPULATION 20000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DRIVEWAY D NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET SILVER LAKE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST WM SMITH DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 04-01-1997 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD DEVELOPMENT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL • INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 15 11 17 58 THRU 0 3 370 141 RIGHT 36 54 11 47 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 2 2 411 LANE USAGE L + R L + TR SADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES o MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 411 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS EB 5 .50 5 .50 0 . 00 5 .50 WB 5 .50 5 .50 0 . 00 5 .50 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5 .50 5 .50 0 . 00 5 .50 NB 5 .50 5 .50 0 . 00 5 .50 MINOR THROUGHS EB 6 .50 6 .50 0 . 00 6 .50 WB 6 .50 6 .50 0 . 00 6 .50 MINOR LEFTS EB 7 . 00 7 . 00 0 . 00 7 . 00 WB 7 . 00 7 .00 0 . 00 7 .00 410 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DRIVEWAY D NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSILVER LAKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 04-01-1997 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD DEVELOPMENT . . . III CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 • POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH , MINOR STREET EB LEFT 17 329 294 294 278 C THROUGH 0 413 386 > 386 > 386 > B RIGHT 40 995 995 > 995 995 > 956 956 >A A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 12 331 302 302 290 C THROUGH 3 403 377 > 377 > 373 > B RIGHT 59 900 900 > 839 900 > 776 841 >A A MAJOR STREET ' 410 SB LEFT 64 717 717 717 653 A NB LEFT 19 903 903 903 884 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DRIVEWAY D NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSILVER LAKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 04-01-1997 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD DEVELOPMENT • 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 1 AREA POPULATION 20000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DRIVEWAY E NAME ,OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET SILVER LAKE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST WM SMITH DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 04-01-1997 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD DEVELOPMENT III INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT -- 12 0 40 THRU -- 0 362 148 RIGHT -- 36 12 0 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES -- 2 2 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-• PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND --- --- WESTBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N " SOUTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND --- --_ WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 411 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS WB 5 .50 5 .50 0 .00 5 .50 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5 .50 5 .50 0 . 00 5 .50 MINOR LEFTS WB 7 . 00 7 .00 0 . 00 7 . 00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DRIVEWAY E NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSILVER LAKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS O4-01-1997 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD DEVELOPMENT • 411 • CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c =. c - v LOS P M SH R SH MINOR STREET WE LEFT 13 399 384 384 371 B RIGHT 40 904 904 904 864 A MAJOR STREET • SE LEFT 44 723 723 - 723 679 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 410 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DRIVEWAY E NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSILVER LAKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS O4-01-1997 ; PM .PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD DEVELOPMENT • MEMORANDUM • ■Si PAUL,MN MINNEAPOLIS,MN E Si CLOUD,MN CHIPPEWA FALLS. WI ❑ MADISON, WI TO: Jim Erickson, Planner, City of Mounds View Pamela Sheldon, City of Mounds View�>�/� FROM: Glen Van Wormer and John Hagen U " DATE: May 20, 1997 RE: Review of Site Traffic Impact Analysis Proposed PUD at Silver Lake Road and TH 10 Mounds View, Minnesota SEH No. A-MOUND9601.00 We had an opportunity to review the March 19, 1997 traffic impact analysis prepared by Biko Associates and summarized our comments in a May 9, 1997 memo. Biko Associates responded in a memo we received on May 16, 1997. We recognize this is a concept PUD and therefore discussed the site layout in our earlier report only in general terms. Our primary focus was the traffic report,which we were in general agreement with. Our general concern were a few on-site conflicts and circulation issues as well as the operation of Driveway D. We appreciated Biko Associates' response and hopefully we can clarify issues to assist the City in its deliberation over approval or modification of the concept PUD. On-Site Circulation We remain concerned over circulation for the car wash and fast food drive through facility. Having the fast food pickup window on the east side of the building raises more concerns than we had initially. Vehicles in the stacking lane will move from the south to the east sides of the building. Vehicles which are exiting the service station area towards the common drive south of the building will conflict with this drive through traffic, passing on its left. Having a drive through vehicle pull around the building and keep left of the exiting vehicle will be unusual. If, to further complicate the matter, another vehicle is entering the service station from the common road, the southbound exiting vehicle must pass between two vehicles coming northbound. Adding car wash traffic increases the conflict and potential confusion. Even with flexible stanchions, traffic flow will be interesting, especially at night. We also remain concerned over car wash traffic and some of the conflicts created by it. Whether the • motorists first get a pass from inside the building or not, they, and the fast food drive through traffic, Jim Erickson and Pamela Sheldon May 20, 1997 Page No. 2 must both enter the stacking lanes adjacent to Driveway D on the north side of the building. This will add to the conflicts at Driveway D. As an example, southbound Silver Lake Road traffic entering at Driveway D, after finding a gap in northbound traffic, must now watch for left turning and crossing traffic from the service station area to the stacking and drive through lanes. Motorists entering the site via Driveway D must also be aware that the preceding motorist may slow to make a right turn. Motorists must also make an immediate decision on whether they will proceed to the right to the stacking lanes,proceed straight to the parking area,or turn left to the gas pump area. The slight nonalignment of the aisle and the driveway further complicates the issue. Delivery and Trash Delivery trucks, using the front door for deliveries to the service station, will block the parking area and the aisle. They will not be able to park along three other sides of the building because of the fast food stacking aisle and order windows. It is assumed that deliveries to the service station will park either at the northwest corner of the site or near the car wash parking area and will then wheel deliveries across the lot to the front door. Trash storage can be addressed in the detailed plans as suggested by Biko. However, the potential • locations are few and all must be separate from the building. One suggestion is to locate it near the car wash so that it is close to the building for the employees and yet somewhat accessible by the trash service vehicles. Driveways The reduction in driveways along Silver Lake Road is appreciated however, we have still not seen a drawing that shows less than five driveways. We have suggested that Mn/DOT may be opposed to three driveways. As a followup, we reviewed the meeting minutes of the April 16 meeting which Biko Associates referred to. The report indicates the following: "Access still remains an issue. They did not show that existing access from the current developed parcel would remain. This would result in a total of four accesses. I told them we prefer not to have four. They should consolidate accesses where possible." "They will submit the preliminary plat and site plan for our review when ready. No issues were resolved. Needs further examination." The Mn/DOT letter of April 23 also indicates that they strongly oppose the proposed four accesses to TH 10 between Silver Lake Road and the site's east limits. This issue will probably be resolved when Mn/DOT reviews the plat and site plan and when they issue driveway and other permits. This may also be a time when our request for a.m. peak hour • driveway review will also be resolved. Mn/DOT may or may not require deceleration lanes as part of their permit. Jim Erickson and Pamela Sheldon May 20, 1997 • Page No. 3 Driveway D We appreciate that Biko Associates provided additional information relative to traffic volumes anticipated at Driveway D. The new volumes look significantly different from those in the original study and appear consistent with volumes in the development. We are in agreement that the average storage length for northbound traffic in the peak hour will be 225 feet which is further than the distance between the traffic signal on Highway 10 and Driveway D. Southbound motorists will not create a stacking problem but will be waiting for an opening in traffic. The alternative to use Driveway E is possible and will probably be used by some motorists. This however puts traffic through the conflict area near the drive through windows which we earlier addressed. As long as there is an opportunity for southbound traffic to bypass waiting southbound left turning traffic, there should not be a negative impact on traffic flow on southbound Silver Lake Road. Ramsey County should review this. Summary We remain concerned about some of the on-site conflicts previously mentioned in either this memo or the May 9 memo. Hopefully the comments will be used by the developer and his staff as the project proceeds. Should there be any questions, please feel free to call us. • sah . F:\PROJECTS\MOU ND\960I\M EMOS\ER ICKSON.52O • • -sal• MEMORANDUM • ST.PAUL,MN ❑ MINNEAPOLIS,MN a ST CLOUD.MN C CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI ❑ MADISON, WI TO: Pamela Sheldon, City of Mounds View / FROM: Rocky Keehn t/ DATE: May 22, 1997 RE: Mounds View, Minnesota Review of PUD for Silver Lake Road and Highway 10 SEH No. A-MOUND9701.00 The PUD area is located in the southeast corner of T.H. Highway 10 and Silver Lake Road. The developer completed a preliminary layout of a proposed development for the City to review. As part of the site plan, there was a proposed Service Station, Condo Building, Restaurant, and Office Building (see attached figure). Besides the building areas, the developer proposed two sediment • ponds. One was located in the east end of the property(east pond) and the other in middle of the site (central pond). Also part of the site plan is an existing office building and wetland. There are four aspects of the project that were reviewed. They were: the wetland protection measures presented, wetland buffer requirements, internal drainage and impacts to the current water elevations in the adjacent wetland. General Comments The calculations sent to us for review did not take into account the existing office building. This building's runoff would need to be added to any calculations for the ponding requirements. Also, the site is a DNR protected waters (62-258 W). Since this is a DNR protected waters, an additional permit and other construction restriction will be required. The developer should also request that the DNR determine an Ordinary Highwater (OHW) for the site. The OHW should then be shown on any future development plans. Wetland Protection The site plan presented for the PUD contains two locations for a NURP or sediment pond (the developer's engineer used NERP which is incorrect). We feel that the east pond is not feasible. In order for the stormwater to reach the east pond from the site, a ditch or pipe must be installed. If it is piped, the existing culvert under Highway 10 would be blocked. If it is ditched, water from the Highway 10 culvert will also be diverted to the treatment pond. The pond would need to be sized • to accommodate drainage from an additional 26 acres. With the additional 26 acres, the proposed pond is more than likely too small. Also,the conveyance system, whether it be ditch or piped,would Pamela Sheldon May 22, 1997 Page No. 211110 go through a portion of the wetland which may be protected by the DNR. If this is the case, it may be more difficult to obtain a permit to fill or excavate in the wetland. The central pond appears to be correctly located,but we questioned how the water from the Condo Building parking lot and drive area would get to the central pond. As proposed, it would need to go through the building or around the back side. A better solution may be to construct a pond in the southwest corner of the property. Based on the information provided by the developer, the proposed pond volume requirement was 0.79 acre-feet. This is based on a runoff factor for the entire site excluding the wetland and the existing office building. Another way to calculate the required volume is to look at the runoff from the directly connected impervious surfaces (those which go directly to the pond without going over grass or pervious surfaces) as one area, and add it to the runoff from the rest of the area. Based on this criteria,the required volume is 0.93 acre-feet. The required area for the 0.93 acre-feet of storage is about 130 feet by 130 feet or about 0.4 acre of land(assumes 8-foot deep retention pond and 4-foot deep detention pond). If the 0.79 acre-feet is used as the criteria, the required size for the same pond depth is 125 feet by 125 feet or about 0.35 acre. These area requirements are larger then proposed for the central pond area. Conclusions: 1. The west pond appears to be in an unfeasible location. • 2. The central pond may need to be larger 3. A new pond may be required for the Condo Building. 4. A new pond may be required on the east end of the property next to the proposed office building on the north side of the wetland. Wetland Buffer Many areas of the project are within in the 100 foot buffer. The revised wetland boundary has reduced the impacts; however, there may still be parking lots and other potentially damaging land uses within the buffer. Building roofs and sidewalks are also in the buffer, but have much less impact to the wetland if runoff from these surfaces goes directly into the wetland. During the final plan, more care should be taken so that parking lots and other potential pollution sources are not in the buffer area. We recommend, due to the potential for a limited buffer area, that a special easement be obtained between the wetland and the development. This will assure City control of the area to maintain the area as a natural buffer. Conclusions: 1. The proposed building site encroaches in the wetland buffer area. 2. Sediment ponds are proposed to mitigate potential pollutants to the wetland and would need to be properly sized in the final plat submittal. 3. Final buffer area appears to be less then the 100-feet in the City ordinance; therefore, the City should obtain a conservation easement for the buffer area to assure it is not mowed and remains a natural buffer. • Pamela Sheldon May 22, 1997 Page No. 3 Internal Drainage Although the internal conveyance system (storm sewer and ditches) is usually not part of a PUD proposal, in this case it does need some discussion as part of our review. The key to the sediment ponds working successfully is getting the runoff to the pond. The original plan proposed using the Mn/DOT ditch as a conveyance system, since approximately 5.3 acres of existing area on the site goes to the ditch. It would be feasible to route some of the proposed development to the wetland since a fair amount of area already goes there. The problem is not with the water quantity, it is with the water quality aspect of the drainage. For the Mn/DOT ditch to be used as a conveyance system, a water quality pond would need to be built prior to discharging into the wetland. As proposed with the pond in the east corner, it appears unfeasible to get the runoff to the pond due to existing culvert under Highway 10, and the fact that the wetland is DNR protected. An alternative would be to build a pond next to the proposed office building. If built, It would need to be sized for runoff from both the existing Mn/DOT right-of-way and the site. Drainage of the existing development to the central pond appears matter-of-fact except for the Condo Building. A storm sewer would need to be placed around the building, or a new pond constructed in the southwest corner of the site. A pond on the southwest corner may need to be sized to handle Silver Lake Road, or provisions made to isolate it from off-site drainage.• 5, Conclusions: 1. The Mn/DOT ditch could be used for drainage if a sediment pond is built next to the proposed office building 2. A storm sewer system for the development can be constructed to drain a large portion of the site to the central sediment pond 3. Special considerations for drainage of the front of the Condo Building are not addressed in the this site plan. Water Elevations of the Existing Wetland The Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) assumed that the site would be Commercial Development. As proposed, the site would have less impervious surfaces than assumed in the LWMP. The LWMP also assumed that the pond directly south on the other side of the St. Paul Water Utility Aqueduct would be part of this wetland for storage purposes. The calculated highwater elevation in the LWMP is 906.2 with a proposed minimum building elevation of 908.2 for the wetland. Also, this site was assumed to be a regional pond, therefore on-site detention ponding is not required. The calculations for impacts to the highwater elevation to the wetland submitted by the developer did not include about 26 acres of area which drain from the north. The total area to the wetland is about 50 acres, not 13 as used by the developer's engineer. Therefore, the information submitted • by the developer cannot be used to determine highwater elevations impacts to the wetland. During final plat development of area, a highwater elevation should be determined based on the Pamela Sheldon May 22, 1997 Page No. 4 • development that occurred at the Senior Center to the south(where the system outlet is located) and that which is proposed on this site. Conclusions: 1. The calculation supplied by the developer for determination of highwater in the wetland area is incorrect,but can be modified at later date. 2. The proposed land use is consistent with that proposed in the LWMP. 3. The highwater elevation for the site in the LWMP is 906.2 with a minimum building elevation of 908.2. 4. On-site detention pond is not required since this is a regional pond modeled as part of a larger drainage system. If you have any questions, please call me at 490-2026. RJK/sh F:\pRoJEcTswOUND\9701\MEMOS\SHELDON.522 • • AirsoMEMORANDUM 0 ST.PAUL,MN 12 MINNEAPOLIS.MN ❑ ST.CLOUD,MN ❑ CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI 0 MADISON, WI TO: Jim Ericson, Planning Associate FROM: Wayne Jacobson, Soil Scientist .9?' DATE: May 16, 1997 SUBJECT: Soil Pit Investigation Results, Silver Lake Road and Highway 10 On May 13, 1997 a soil pit investigation was performed iii the southeast corner of Highway 10 and Silver Lake Road in Township 30 North, Range 23 West, and the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 6 in the City of Mounds View. The purpose of the investigation was to determine the general location of the ground water table. The Washington and Ramsey Counties Soil Survey maps the on site soil as Urban Land-Lino Complex. This was the soil encountered on the site. Two pits were dug, B1 and B2 as shown on the attached map. The subsurface soil profile of the two pits were as follows: Soil Pit B1 Depth Soil Symbol Soil Description 0-1' SM Sandy Loam, fine to medium grained, dark brown, dry 1-11' SP Sand, medium grained, reddish brown, dry 11-13' SP Sand, medium grained, gray, moist. Ground water encountered at 13'. Soil Pit B2 Depth Soil Symbol Soil Description 0-1' SM Sandy Loam, fine to medium grained, dark brown, dry 1-11' SP Sand, medium grained, reddish brown, dry • WEJ/WSW 78 _�� ( I •I( 7-ft Q aw 51`^I+ t .,7i-iii. . � it.Ii, ter Q «�i - ...- Jv wig-Ssi{ i:i[ji 1111 ;to; ;.1.._1 .. ,.: ,. .l 00, 'Pill ItLa.`i '�$`s o.oe$ •-}`• i -• e . • 0. i= 0 � -1 ji:�.3 -�Slsf= a la.- 22‘ $ 0 3 <a £a. -,--1 I3 .% a a1w,s_ i':,0-A4 } I. I:`•'... dl I 'i' i ca "i'.1 ;::!!.4,1::::::::� ra .Lw•,� M1I . I- '1.W ,.1 fl ie iileiit 8� � = ` o !;1,1,,--%, a�s- Z Zi! r:.t•1. i7�F=; IUD!' II _:d:oX'o;g Xa , o _ :a 3�� u r,, ;'. S ,��� I I !pig, 3€si('i - ® alio,*` / II - ill, -L•'ii / II f a,N p� ais:ti 'fot e d4fFrl IiII •,141..iriiii / • .0..t ,,,,v i•'?5,t!,:fi-1 I °1, sIs scf iia % ...x ..,..i....._. ,Ibr A4:E!k�24-3.I�wis i 241,r,•j:...:7 : rii, iVIIii / 1iit.t1 :d,.:lt / j • / / / 4 / / / N / / N % N i / / ° e / 11 iii „12,,,,, y y / j •� am�, � . _. / /• i i"_: 44 Z z -� / tee `. //' i:l: � 1 i� ? III I I�cj•4 : ; •••-,- tz 47 / ,./-•.•_ , , , • i /y iii 7`a /e—r ice♦` ,i li _. 7 .c.,, / •, v x� lYY c_ . �, a;p`1 =- `, / / ,o .',` — i ,,zi ,gn, `"11.20 1 / •/ 4.4 x�f, •• �:4 ! p q `�i-="j Z i 11. o a A • 1L ' v/6/4\7:-// —` - • us 7. N/ / ,l i7.\.„. .. c I - i , q i / � -,a „ .24114 00 ,,► / � / �� ii Ilii t / .e J�+Lim I� ! 9 y gaa a6�bl bl� ' // '''',%•/..'111A.: e •• i _7;'- -.T os ,• ;. •I ': 1 . 0 / l 10, £V i ; \;\ _ dd' , - mJ ire °b''.+ v,,7i .4 \ N.\ --,._,y1.L. � y• J A / . I aOCGC e ii E 7 -..-:—...= _ — — .. , t iiiwei; / *f--��1� •..SOL 37,71 Lf3n-114 .—._._ .—.—._. .� giF t01X Y a • � -�� 07e z 00B. `-, ilvY,. ay-. a a li. 00 41'1E!r • u3au!+ r1-" • Item No. it 6 Staff Report No. 97- ,211.0e Meeting Date:May 27, 1997 • Type of Business: Council Business WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Pamela Sheldon,Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Ordinance No.599,an ordinance approving a rezoning from B-2 to Planned Unit Development(PUD)for mixed uses for property located southeast of Highway 10/Silver Lake Road intersection(2704-2740 Highway 10 and 7801 Silver Lake Road); Planning Case No.477-97 Date of Report: May 23, 1997 Summary: The applicants,D.W. Jones Inc., George and Christine Winiecki,and Five D Limited are requesting approval of a rezoning from B-2 to Planned Unit Development(PUD)(Mixed Use)to allow development of a convenience market/gas station/car wash/fast food restaurant, sit down restaurant, office buildings, and senior citizen housing development. There are two actions needing City Council approval to allow this project to go forward. These include: • ■ approval of a general concept plan;and ■ approval of the ordinance changing the City's official zoning map for this property from B-2 to PUD At your meeting on April 28,the City Council introduced for first reading Ordinance No. 599 which would change the designation on the D.W. Jones property to PUD. The resolution regarding the general concept plan was not before you at that time, because staff expected to prepare it for the meeting when you would be considering second reading of Ordinance No. 599. Since the April 28 meeting,the City Attorney and staff have consulted further about the order in which actions need to be taken. We are suggesting for this meeting,that City Council take action on the resolution related to the general concept plan first(Resolution No. 5127)and then take action on the change to the zoning map(Ordinance No. 599). Ordinance No. 599 is attached to this report. Resolution No. 5127 is attached to the staff report on the general concept plan. The discussion of the issues from the April 28 meeting is in that report. Adoption of ordinances related to zoning require a 4/5, roll call vote. Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance No. 599, an ordinance approving a rezoning from B-2 to Planned Unit Development(PUD)for mixed uses for property located southeast of Highway 10/Silver Lake Road intersection • piomA 1L thAAAA,-7 . Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Director N:\DATA\USERS\PAMS\SHARE\DEVCASES\477-97VONESCC2RPT r ORDINANCE NO. 5994111 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A REZONING FROM B-2 TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PUD)FOR MIXED USES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE HIGHWAY 10/SILVER LAKE ROAD (2704-2740 HIGHWAY 10 AND 7801 SILVER LAKE ROAD),AND AMENDING THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP. THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Whereas, D.W. Jones, Inc., George and Christine Wmiecki, and Five D Limited have applied for a rezoning from B-2 to Planned Unit Development (PUD)for properties located within an area bounded by Silver Lake Road, Highway 10 and the southern boundary of the St. Paul Waterworks right-of-way(excluding that property owned by TJB Homes), and described as follows That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 30, • Range 23,Ramsey County,Minnesota described as beginning at the southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter;thence easterly along the south line of said Southeast Quarter 1,346.90 feet to the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 10;thence northwesterly along said center line 1,434.13 feet to the center line of Silver Lake Road;thence southwesterly and southerly 1,219.64 feet along said last centerline to the point of beginning. Subject to State Trunk Highway No. 10,Silver Lake Road and St.Paul Waterworks Right of Way. Except that part of said Southeast Quarter described as commencing at the southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter and measuring easterly along the south line of said Section 6 a distance of 1,346.9 feet to the intersection of the center line of Highway No. 10(Anoka Cut-oft);thence northwesterly along the centerline of said Highway No. 10,a distance of 765.9 feet to the point of beginning;thence southwesterly at right angles to the center line of said Highway No. 10 a distance of 275 feet;thence northwesterly and parallel with said centerline 100 feet;thence northeasterly at a right angle to the centerline of said Highway No. 10;thence southeasterly along said Highway No. 10 to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, the proposed uses include a gas station/convenience market/fast food restaurant, car wash, sit down restaurant, senior citizen housing development, and office building; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Planning Application • 2. Zoning Map Ordinance 599 • Page 2 3. PUD Concept Plan,dated 4/22/97 4. Letter from Applicant,dated 3/5/97 5. Letter from Developer,3/19/97 6. Letter from St.Paul Water Utility,dated 2/24/97 7. Letter from Minnesota DNR,dated 3/3/97 8. Letter from the US Army Corp of Engineers,dated 3/24/97 9. Letters from Residents 10. Market Needs Analysis/Traffic Analysis,dated 3/19/97 11. Tax Impact Analysis,dated 3/19/97 12. Memoranda from SEH Consultants re:traffic,dated 5/9/97 and 5/20/97 13. Memoranda from SEH Consultants re: soil investigation,dated 5/16/97 14. Planning Commission Resolution No. 505-97 Recommending Approval WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has received a recommendation of approval from the Mounds View Planning Commission as stated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 505-97; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council does hereby find that this proposal meets the general requirements and standards for Planned Unit Developments(Section 1120.02) as follows: • (1) Ownership: The application for approval of this rezoning has been filed by D.W. Jones, Inc and Christine and George Winiecki, owners of the property at the time of filing. Five D Limited has purchased the Wmiecki property and has consented to the filing of the application. (2) Comprehensive Plan Consistency: The comprehensive plan designation on this property is mixed use PUD. The proposal is consistent with this designation. (3) Common Open Space (5) Staging of Common Open Space The proposal will include preservation of an 4.5 acre wetland and portions of the wetland buffer. The senior citizen housing project will include open space surrounding the building. (4) Operating and Maintenance Requirements: Not applicable at this time. The PUD stipulations, adopted with the general concept plan, require the execution of maintenance agreements, and cross access and parking easements between certain development parcels prior to approval of the final plan. Maintenance responsibilities are assigned to the property owner otherwise. (6) Density: The allowable densities are stated in the PUD stipulations, adopted with the general concept plan. Ordinance 599 Page 3 (7) Utilities: A requirement has been included in the PUD stipulations that all utilities be installed underground. (8) Utility Connections: Requirements for shut-off valves and service manholes will be established at the time of development stage plan review. (9) Roadways: A private common driveway is proposed between three of the development parcels. This final design and location of this common driveway will be established as part of development stage plan review. (10) Landscaping The PUD stipulations require that a detailed landscaping plan be submitted at the time of development stage plan review. The stipulations also include a requirement that trees 10" or more in diameter be inventoried and preserved wherever possible in parking lot islands, and in setback and buffer areas. (11) Public Services: The proposed project will be served by City water and sewer system. There are trunk lines for water, sewer and storm sewer in the abutting streets. The PUD stipulations include a requirement that fire hydrants be installed as directed by the Fire Department. (12) Building Height: The permitted building heights are stated in the PUD stipulations. • (13) Refuse: The PUD stipulations require a plan for the location of trash dumpster and for trash service be submitted at the time of development stage plan review. (14) Site Improvement Agreement: The PUD stipulations require that a site improvement agreement be signed by the property owner and developer prior to approval of the final plan. The agreement shall include a requirement that all on- site and off-site improvements be installed according to a schedule acceptable to the City Council, and be guaranteed through an escrow account, letter of credit or surety bond. WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council finds that this proposal meets the special requirements and standards for mixed-use PUDs(Section 1120.03, Subd. 3) as follows: Required Provided Minimum Project Size 5 acres 12.96 acres Minimum Street Frontage 200 feet 960 feet Minimum Property Width 200 feet 780 feet Ordinance 599 • Page 4 Landscaping, Screening and Surfacing: (1) The entire site,other than that taken up by structures or landscaping shall be surfaced with a material to control dust,drainage and erosion. The applicant is proposing to pave all parking areas, access drives and the internal roadway. (2) A drainage system conforming to the comprehensive storm drainage plan and subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer shall be installed. A preliminary review of the drainage system proposed for this development indicates that NURP ponds will be required to accommodate approximately one acre foot of water, and will occupy approximately .4 acre of land. The City Engineer has suggested possible locations for these ponds based on the topography of the site and design of the development. The applicant will be required to provide a drainage plan with the development stage plan. Approval for the location and sizing of the NURP ponds and for the system of directing drainage flows shall be obtained from the City Engineer and from the Minnesota Department of Transportation prior to approval of the development stage plan. A . requirement has been included in the PUD stipulations that adjustments shall be made in the density and layout of the development if needed to accommodate the necessary drainage improvements. (3) Development abutting an R-1,R-2,or R-3 District shall be screened and landscaped in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1)through(5)of this Title. This requirement is not applicable since the subject properties do not abut any R-1, R-2 or R-3 Districts. The proposal would meet the requirements of Section 1103.08 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that the Official Zoning Map for the City of Mounds View is hereby amended to change the zoning designation on the property described above from B-2 to PUD (Mixed Use), subject to the requirements for approval of a general concept plan, development stage plan and final plan as stated in Section 1120 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, and execution of the PUD stipulations by the property owner(s) and recordation of the PUD stipulations with the Ramsey County Recorder. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 28th day of April, 1997. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 27th day of May, 1997. Ordinance 599 . Page 5 Duane McCarty, Mayor ATTEST: Charles Whiting, City Clerk-Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: Robert Long, City Attorney N:\DATA\USERS\PAMS\SHARE\DEVCASES1477-97\DWJONES.ORD • • Item No. II C. Staff Report No. 9 7-Z/I I C Meeting Date: May 27, 1997 411 Type of Business: Council Business WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mayor and City Council From: Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Ordinance No. 598, an ordinance approving a rezoning from B-1 and R-2 to Planned Unit Development(PUD)for commercial uses on the O'Neil property,2430 Highway 10; Planning Case No. 471-97 Date of Report: May 23, 1997 Summary: The applicants, Anthony Properties Management, Inc. and Louise O'Neil, are requesting approval of a rezoning from B-1 and R-2 to Planned Unit Develpoment (PUD)(Mixed Use)to allow development of a 16-screen movie theater, three 11,000 square foot office buildings, and two restaurant sites on the O'Neil property. There are three actions needing City Council approval to allow this project to go forward. These • include: • approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment changing the designation on this property from medium density residential to mixed use; • approval of a general concept plan; and • approval of the ordinance changing the City's official zoning map for this property from B-1 and R-2 to PUD At your meeting on May 12, 1997, the City Council passed Resolution No. 5104 approving the Comp Plan amendment, Resolution No. 5119 approving the general concept plan, and introduced for first reading Ordinance No. 598, which would change the designation for the O'Neil property on the City's official zoning map to PUD. The item before City Council at this meeting is second reading and consideration of Ordinance No. 598. Adoption of ordinances related to zoning require a 4/5, roll call vote. Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance No. 598, an ordinance approving a rezoning form B-1 and R-2 to Planned Unit Development (PUD)for commercial uses on the O'Neil property, 2430 Highway 10;Planning Case No. 471-97. • 1)},AlitAAAL Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Director N:\DATA\USERS\PAMS\SHARE\DEVCASES\471-97\471-97.CC3 T ORDINANCE NO. 598 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A REZONING FROM B-1 AND R-2 TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FOR COMMERCIAL USES ON THE O'NEIL PROPERTY,2430 HIGHWAY 10,AND AMENDING THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP. THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Whereas, Anthony Properties Management, Inc. and Louise O'Neil have applied for a rezoning from B-1 and R-2 to Planned Unit Development(PUD)for property bounded by Highway 10, Long Lake Road, and County Road H2, and described as follows: Part lying southwesterly of centerline of STH No. 10 of southwest 1/4 of northwest 1/4 (subject to roads, highway and easements) in Section 08, Township 30, Range 23. • WHEREAS, the proposed uses include a 16-screen movie theater, three 11,000 square foot office buildings, and two restaurant sites; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Planning Application 2. Zoning Map 3. PUD Concept Plan,dated 2/7/97 4. Traffic Study prepared by SRF Consulting,dated 4/17/97 5. Traffic Study(for Restaurant Sites)prepared by SRF Consulting,dated 5/2/97 6. Preliminary Drainage Calculations 7. Available Utility Connections for Water,Sewer and Storm Sewer 8. Market Summary 9. Summaries of Neighborhood Meetings(12/12/96, 1/15/97) WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has received a recommendation of approval from the Mounds View Planning Commission as stated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 503-97; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council does hereby find that this proposal meets the general requirements and standards for Planned Unit Developments (Section 1120.02) as follows: • Ordinance No. 598 • Page 2 (1) Ownership: The application for approval of this rezoning has been filed by Louise O'Neil, owner of the property. (2) Comprehensive Plan Consistency: The comprehensive plan designation on this property is a combination of lower and higher intensity, mixed use which includes both commercial and residential uses. The proposal is consistent with this designation. (3) Common Open Space (5) Staging of Common Open Space The proposal will include preservation of an 8.5 acre wetland, a 50 foot buffer area along the County Road 112 frontage, and a substantial portion of the wetland buffer area. The PUD stipulations, adopted with the general concept plan include requirements for the protection of open space (forested) areas during construction, and the staging of the buffer area along County Road 112. (4) Operating and Maintenance Requirements: Not applicable at this time. The PUD stipulations, adopted with the general concept plan, require the execution of maintenance agreements, and cross access and parking easements for each of the development parcels prior to approval of the final plan, if the property is to be subdivided. Maintenance responsibilities are assigned to the property owner otherwise. (6) Density: The allowable densities are stated in the PUD stipulations, adopted with the general concept plan. (7) Utilities: A requirement has been included in the PUD stipulations that all utilities be installed underground. (8) Utility Connections: Requirements for shut-off valves and service manholes will be established at the time of development stage plan review. (9) Roadways: No private roadways are proposed in this development. (10) Landscaping: The PUD stipulations require that a detailed landscaping plan be submitted at the time of development stage plan review. The stipulations also include a requirement that trees 10" or more in diameter be inventoried and preserved wherever possible in parking lot islands, and in setback and buffer areas. (11) Public Services: The proposed project will be served by City water and sewer system. There are trunk lines for water, sewer and storm sewer in the abutting streets. The PUD stipulations include a requirement that fire hydrants be installed as directed by the Fire Department. Ordinance No. 598 • Page 3 (12) Building Height: The permitted building heights are stated in the PUD stipulations. (13) Refuse: The PUD stipulations require a plan for the location of trash dumpster and for trash service be submitted at the time of development stage plan review. (14) Site Improvement Agreement: The PUD stipulations require that a site improvement agreement be signed by the property owner and developer prior to approval of the final plan. The agreement shall include a requirement that all on- site and off-site improvements be installed according to a schedule acceptable to the City Council, and be guaranteed through an escrow account, letter of credit or surety bond. WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council finds that this proposal meets the special requirements and standards for commercial PUDs (Section 1120.03, Subd. 2) as follows: Required Provided Minimum Project Size 5 acres 23.99 acres Minimum Street Frontage 200 feet 1690 feet Minimum Property Width 200 feet 1280 feet 110 Landscaping, Screening and Surfacing: (1) The entire site,other than that taken up by structures or landscaping shall be surfaced with a material to control dust,drainage and erosion. The applicant is proposing to pave all parking areas and access drives. (2) A drainage system conforming to the comprehensive storm drainage plan and subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer shall be installed. The City Engineer has reviewed the applicant's preliminary calculations for the amount of runoff expected and the sizing of the NURP ponds needed to provide water quality treatment before the runoff enters the wetland, and found them acceptable. The proposed locations for the NURP ponds are also acceptable, subject to detailed grading plans to be prepared as part of the development stage plan. The proposed drainage system is consistent with the City's local water management plan, and will provide the necessary water quality filtering before runoff enters the wetland. Increased flows into the wetland will increase water surface elevations by 0.2 feet in a 10 year storm, and 0.3 feet in a 100 year storm. The increased water elevation will not have a negative impact on adjacent structures or roads;the water will remain on the site. The City Engineer recommends that the existing 15" pipe from the wetland into the Long Lake Road storm sewer remain as is, since enlarging it would cause capacity problems downstream and there is enough room to store water in the wetland. There should not be any impacts to existing groundwater table, and • Ordinance No.598 Page 4 little change in the current recharge potential of the area. An engineered drainage design will be submitted at the development plan stage. Residents south of the O'Neil property have expressed concerns that this development will increase existing problems with flooding in their backyards. The City Engineer reviewed this situation and responded that the localized flooding south of County Road H2 is not affected by , the O'Neil property, even with development. Also, according to Al Sunderman, a groundwater specialist in the City Engineer's Office,there should not be any impacts to the existing groundwater table in the area. It is the City Engineer's view that flooding in the neighborhood is being caused by upstream drainage from the north side of Highway 10 overloading the existing storm drain system in the neighborhood. (3) Development abutting an R-1,R-2,or R-3 District shall be screened and landscaped in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(1)through(5)of this Title. This requirement is not applicable since the subject properties do not abut any R-1, R-2 or R-3 Districts. The proposal would meet the requirements of Section 1103.08. WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has adopted Resolution No. 5119, approving a general concept plan to allow development of commercial uses on the O'Neil property and including PUD stipulations which shall be met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that the Official Zoning Map for the City of Mounds View is hereby amended to change the zoning designation on the property described above from B-i and R-2 to PUD (Commercial Uses), subject to the requirements for approval of a general concept plan, development stage plan and final plan as stated in Section 1120 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, and execution of the PUD stipulations by the property owner(s) and recordation of the PUD stipulations with the Ramsey County Recorder . Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 12th day of May, 1997. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 27th day of May, 1997. Duane McCarty, Mayor ATTEST: Ordinance No. 598 • Page 5 ATTEST: Charles S. Whiting, City Clerk-Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: Robert Long, City Attorney N:\DATA\USERS\DAMS\SHARE\DEVCASES\471-97\ONEIL.ORD i • • q/107'ell _Ae7 e' r/7 Cce4.1c1/__ rAr- azvd C2,-Ykr2_ • Cfkezee,24' . N,VX dee.ze4r4-lef41-- /41.54 /4/ck -7`1X -41c,LciAia./_,ey2,zrcze___ tre.e c7,4,/-Ae 7P,)e 4e.4-2.. 44,e/ . • ckia.ze E'eccaee/ ekr4auzociiAlez76ez7 ,eesgag-45- ; ,--/re.s.eive-94:s-__ ___ciL.X._/. .__eF.,e-e ch/-04.Z_colvd."-,04'elid/ 37ev6 i0Z.L44 74<e Z)1,4?/•alc 41 - 4./ete,.ot Xe-c.5;12(.act- - ca-,z vc24. _____12!Zece. 61/ 24.14 e e'/-/y '7(f- <*C_ TO: CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW • MAYOR COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: RESIDENTS AFFECTED BY REZONING/DEVELOPMENT OF O'NEIL PROPERTY We the undersigned residents are expressing our concern over the proposed rezoning/development of the O'Neil property. We feel the following items need to be properly addressed and or rectified prior to any rezoning and subsequent development: • The proposed six (6) foot high buffer on County Road H2 will not insulate us from noise and pollution due to increased traffic. We feel a controlled semaphore intersection at the developments entrance will be necessary to keep this unwanted noise, traffic and pollution from our neighborhood. • The City needs to solve the on going noise problems the residents of Edgewood Dr. are experiencing from Robert's off Ten. The decibel levels of music are much too high, the management fails to adequately be responsible for its patrons loud behavior, littering our yards, and loitering in the parking lot long after closing time. The residents need proper enforcement and adequate buffers to shield us from this long standing noise problem. • • The City needs to address and solve the increased commercial traffic on County Road H2 and Edgewood Dr. The semi-trailer traffic on County Road H2 is only increasing the degradation of this road already in bad repair. The commercial traffic on Edgewood Drive needs to be eliminated as this is a 100% residential street. • We request the developer to offer residents abutting the development on County Road H2 and Edgewood Dr., privacy fencing to adequately shield us from the increased noise and traffic if City approves this development. • The proposals do not address the need for the developer to provide security. especially with such a large complex. Not having proper security employees would mean the residents on the city will foot the bill for increased police calls not to mention delays in response time for other police calls. We feel the city first needs to rectify these problems before taking on the added responsibility of this large complex and further burdening the residence's peace, protection, and quality of life. • �� 2�i"-Kinvr•`:1ct— G./L/irAve //L yvYigo- 0 A ,vv,D (_. ) A-A-4 dU1 • roams/Signature Name/Signature moo/ - ,e,.,- ,(9,,,Le_ r- 1")(g *) 0 y Pc( -/oZ Address Address Date Date 7-7 , ri4i-li 4 41 '4 ii ti nt6:6-Ge r 7ec(2 Al Name/Signature (% 0 Name/Signature . 5-2 yz C ,.//F Gc)O ., idLJ(0°) C 1rri'1 �c F00c Address Address • 5-zz-97 .c0 -(-17 Date IP Date Name/Sig : re Name/Signatlfte 501 ? -< 4_40 6 )41. _519 -1-Q6cA AC(fQ s C` Address I Address _ Date Date • �e , :LOW ,,,,--,---\,,,,,.„---- Name/Signature Name/Signature Z`\loZ C�> L.,,� \�—t. 6-...2 $7 eet4 i woove ceY 73 - ZZ Address Address Date Date k-/- -A_//,/ C,-C.LJ o 2,, i . Com.A4174---- Name/Signature -„ ---Name/Signature Name/Signature ( 2271-c-27 i /-7 a7 S(9-q-7 A s Address / .7 S-3 -9-) D,te Date 0 : /01 • Name/Signature-" Name/Signature Add ess Address 5 - (-7 Dtte � Date e/Signa re Name/Signature Address Address Date Date (Name/Signature ' Name/Signature Address Address Date ' ��/ • Date Name/Signature Name/Signature Address Address J -17 Date Date Name/Signature Name/Signature 4,, (9 Address Address Date Date i lID • ADMINISTRA'T'IVE POLICY-- DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS PROPERTY Policy Intent: To provide for a uniform, expedient and equitable method of disposing of City fixed asset property determined to be surplus. This policy does not apply to City owned real estate. Determining Surplus Property: Department Heads will determine a fixed asset to be an item which no longer meets a useful or apparent need for the City. Such items will be identified by their fixed asset number and a list of items to be surplused will be submitted to the Director of Finance for removal from the fixed asset record of the City. The list of surplused items will then be submitted to the City Council for its approval to dispose. Disposition of Surplus Property: Upon approval by the City Council of items to be surplused, the Department Head will notify an auction house to be determined by the Clerk Administrator and bring the items to the auction house for disposition through normal house bidding procedures. Monies recieved from the items sold will be receipted back to the fund that originally purchased the item. City Personnel and Bidding: City employees may bid on items auctioned. Items may not be removed from the bidding process for purchase by city personnel. • Exceptions: Surplus items may be removed from this process where the item to be disposed is part of trade in on a newer piece of equipment, or where a similar method of disposition is used, such as a state car sale auction. Non-Fixed Asset Items: Surplus items that are not considered fixed assets may be disposed of through the auction process or by such method determined appropriate by the Department Head to be in the best interests of the City. City personnel may not acquire these items unless disposed of through auction. Effective Date: Charles S. Whiting Clerk Administrator • • lID q7-a iia� • MEMO TO: CHUCK WHITING FROM: MARY SAARION DATE: MAY 21, 1997 SUBJECT: INVENTORY OF BEL RAE EQUIPMENT There are several items at the Bel Rae that will not be used because of alcohol advertising or because of lack of need. I request that these items be approved as surplus items to be advertised for sale at the best offered price. The list of items at this time are as follows: 1 - Time Clock System Steel Gate for a doorway 1 -Large restaurant size stainless steel meat slicer 1 - Stainless Steel Large Lettuce Slicer 2 - Schmidt Beer condiment holders 1 -very old cash register(don't know that it works, but looks like an antique!) 1 - electronic Casio 2112 ER cash register 1 -DPM electronic cash register 1 - Safe - Sentary Valueguard 1380 . 100 or more plastic ashtrays 100 or more glass ashtrays 100 or more plastic Michalob serving trays 1 Electronic coat rack 1 neon hamburger sign Many- All the permanent tables -they are very difficult to move, weigh a ton and are in dis-repair with laminated coverings coming off. The heavy pedestal legs are unattached. Free Standing Metal shelving - old and not complying to Ramsey County standards. Items that will be kept in storage and used at the Community Center after renovation is completed: Construction manager will determine what can be saved in the kitchen ie the stainless steel cupboards and shelving, sinks, etc. 1 Piano Forks, spoons& knives Glass plates, glasses, cups and saucers Serving dishes including pitchers, trays, bowls, untensils, etc. Center piece votiles Sound system, disco ball, ceiling spot lights Velvet curtains and frames used for display, backdrops, etc. Coffee pots • Microwave Box Freezer • Folding Chairs (over 1,000) Folding Tables (approximately 10 - 15) Floor buffers and all custodial equipment Games tables which have been obtained during the past months will also be stored elsewhere and will be brought back to the teen area upon re-opening. Carts and all trash receptacles that are in good condition. . • • Minnesota A♦ Children Minnesota Department of Children, Families & Learning May 19, 1997 r ' p ana ` ® N LY Chuck Whiting, City Administrator City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Whiting: You have by now, hopefully, received your letter from Commissioner Robert Wedl advising you of your successful youth initiative grant proposal. As his letter indicated, you can proceed to the predesign component of the project. The letter also states that your grant is a maximum amount not to exceed • $375,000. The factors that will determine the actual amount of the contract include: • that required match is documented and committed; • if the match is an "in-kind" match, the "in-kind" portion is approved by the Department of Finance; • expenditures are eligible under authorizing legislation and are considered to be an appropriate use of state bond funds • if a nonprofit corporation is going to operate the program, the lease and operating agreement will need to be executed and approved by the Department of Finance • if a nonprofit corporation is going to operate the program, the Commissioner of the Department of Children, Families and Learning must certify that the nonprofit has the financial strength to operate the program for the term of the bond. The first step in the grant process will be to schedule a meeting relatively soon with staff from the Department of Administration to get the predesign process started. Please give me a call at 612/297-4832, or email at nancy.valento@state.mn.us so we can get started. Thank you. Sincerely, • Nancy Valento Lia-17,Y1 Planning Grants Coordinator Division of Management Assistance 550 Cedar Street • St. Paul, Minnesota • 55101-2273 Phone (612) 296-6104 • FAX (612) 296-3272 • TTY(612) 297-2094 • E-mail: Children©state.mn.us 5-22-1997 3:01PM FROM CITY COLUMBIA HGTS. 612 782 2801 P. 1 NII0 RS I n '' , ,...... •- 41%siO atLY • MinnesotaAChi1dr Minnesota Department of Children, Families & Learning • Post-1t•Fax Note 7671 Date 56� gas*er2 May 16, 1997 TrA,._41. tom) • green(Oa. - F_.o1.s� c° t� c°. �'X . ir_ _ pti�L�...:.� Pn°n°* sic Fax+�� if35(6.a..1 ax# Mr. Walter Fchst - City Manager . ._._ w_..........__ City of Columbia Heights 590 -40th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Mr. Fchst: This letter is in reference to a youth initiative grant proposal you recently submitted to this agency. This is to inform you that we do not recommend that you proceed to the predesign component of the grant process. Although your proposal was outstanding,we received 38 • applications requesting over$16 million. We have$4.5 million available. At some point in the future, if any of the grantees do not meet the requirements set forth in the law, or are unable to meet the conditions for use of state bond funds,we will reallocate the funds. It is unlikely that this will occur,but if it does,we will recommend other projects that did not receive grants. Thank you for your efforts to develop programs that serve the children of your community. Sincerely, ap -a.:121,....T. Iti. Daniel F.Bryan, ManageAll Division of Manageine.-tance • 550 Cedar Street • St. Paul, Minnesota • 55101-2273 6-22-1997 3:01PM FROM CITY COLUMBIA HGTS. 612 782 2801 P. 2 Youth Initiative Grants 1997 • •• • • • Political 'Project Name 'Maximum amount ` Subdivision of grant • Grand Rapids Schools ;D.A.N.C.E. ! $ 767000.00 • City of Mounds View j C_ommun'�y Youth Center 375,000,O6 City of Rosemount !Rosemount Family Resource Center I 214,000.00 City of Fridley i Facilities for Youth Activities F 295,900.00 Duluth Schools 'Lincoln Park Collaborative for Youth 1,300,000.00 Wadena Schools (Outdoor Physical Education&Recre 73,259.00 • Barnum Schools 'Barnum Youth Center 312,236.00 City of Cloquet Riverfront Youth Recreation.Center 400,000.00 , Bagley Schools 'Family Center Resource Center I 167,321.00 • Long Prairie Schools Long Prairie Family Center j 300,000,00 Cook County 14H Park and Recrea Log Building Ren i 46,000.00 Lancaster Schools ;Lancaster Youth Initiative Center i- 470,469.00 • .1"".; ,`-‘, `-r"1 rq, 1/4 c f ‘e//I-1°)W bi ONLY , /,y./_ 04feueiw •. 411 -ib �� fee"1f Columbia Heights multi use center(10) -- seems to have long history of trying to get project going. People want it but aren't willing to pay for it. --no funds committed--but city will match grant — lack of community ownership -- very well written,answered the questions flowed well. --How committed is the city to match and provide service long term -- very sports oriented • • --not targeted to the kids 9-13,more for the community --not linking to youth organization —no strong connection to after school collaborative program funds --no community ownership • Pinewood Elementary School • „< 5500 Quincy St. • Mounds View, Mn. 55112• Phone:784-4006• Fax: 639-6153 Community of Learners Donna B. Nelson, Principal Growing Together May 22, 1997 INFORMATION Tim Ramacher, Chief of Police ONLY City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN RE: Tim Brennan, Dear Chief Ramacher, D.A.R.E. Officer On behalf of the Pinewood Elementary School Community, I want to thank you, the Police Department and City of Mounds View for your continued support of the DARE Program at Pinewood. We can't tell you enough how much it means to the students and their families to have such a positive experience with a police officer. The information and learning that is a part of • the DARE program is essential in the development of our young people. We want you to know that we deeply value the DARE program as a part of the experience we can offer our students. Further, we need to share with you the fact that we have seen Tim Brennan do an absolutely outstanding job in his role as our DARE Officer. Even though this is his first year, he has demonstrated a deep commitment and caring for the students with whom he has worked. His connections with the students has been wonderful to see and the results of the Bike-a-thon fund raising is certainly indicative of the students' support for the program and Tim. This was our most successful year, yet. Tim's ability to work well with others was also noticed and appreciated. He is very well organized, knew when to seek assistance and always did so in an appropriate and gracious way. He worked with the PTA, the office staff and the Principal to assure that the DARE program was an integral part of our school. He has truly been a valued member of our staff. We hope you will share him with us again next year! We want you to know how enthusiastic we are in our support of the DARE program for our students. Recognizing there are some criticisms of the • program in the media these days; please understand we have no reliable way to measure the number of students this program truly impacts. We find greater Equal Opportunity for Education and Employment numbers of students entering our schools who at higher risk for learning and • social problems. We can only imagine the increased numbers of our kids who would be unable to make appropriate choices without the support of our community through programs like DARE. We applaud you for continuing to care that we make a difference for every child we can. Again, thanks for sending us Tim Brennan. Part of the resounding success of this program for our kids is his personal touch and deep commitment to them. We are very grateful he has been a part of our Pinewood Community this year. Sincerely, 1977,6- Donna B. Nelson, Principal cc: Mounds View City Council Duane McCarty, Mayor Tim Brennan, DARE Officer Pinewood Fifth Grade Teachers • • err OF ' - f L « , THIS IS I -21p," `p HMV�.pS O"TJX.Partner JUNE 2 -JUNE 6, 1997 ADMINISTRATION Is It. A short but busy week. Mary Saarion and I met June is finally here. Isn't that amazing. with the folks who administer the grant we will receive for work at the Bel Rae. Grants always Chuck have red tape and this will be no exception, although it shouldn't be too back. The Council ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT gave Mary kudos for her work at Tuesday's meeting and her reward will be to process the Wolf& Associates: grant paperwork for us. Thanks Mare! Wolf&Associates, located in the Mounds View Industrial Park on Mustang Circle, have been The Council and department heads met on looking to sell their business for over a year. Wednesday evening for a team building session. I They currently are working with a very interested •hought it went well. We reviewed some of the buyer who would like to double the current space items listed from our March work session and and bring approximately 250 jobs to the area. everyone seemed to feel we are moving in the They would need to acquire the 2.3 acres next to right direction. We discussed reviewing and Wolf to complete the expansion and also would updating our mission statement and values like to acquire the City owned property where the statements. Pam and Cathy offered to head this old water tower used to be. I will be meeting up for the group. This Monday evening we will with the company next week to discuss their spend a little more time reviewing the session and proposal and come up with a solution that will be discuss a couple of ways to move forward. One a win/win situation for the company, Wolf& method may be to develop subcommittees of the Associates and the City prior to bringing this Council to work with department heads from time matter to the Council for consideration. to time on policy matters in order to help develop the skills of the Council and to bring department Back Full Time: heads and myself along on policy type matters. Beginning June 2nd I will be returning to work five days per week. I have really appreciated the Within City Hall,Lynette, Cathy and me will be opportunity to have a flexible schedule to spend meeting next Thursday with the personnel quality time with Casey over these past six consultant to frame up some goals and processes months. I think it has been very beneficial to our for improving personnel relations and morale. entire family and will make the transition to This first started at our group wide meeting last working a full schedule much easier. November and has been a while in the making, ti ikb ut finally we will get started. This should help Metropolitan Livable Community Act Goals: all sorts of things and everyone's input is hoped I am attaching a letter to Judy Karon from for. Watch for more on this in next week's This Ramsey County regarding the City's goals under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. I 27111S IS IT JUNE 2-JUNE 6,I• was confused with Ramsey County's COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT interpretation of the Met Council's table that stated Mounds View's forecast for adding new Development Projects affordable rental or ownership units was zero. MSP Real Estate has submitted an application for Since City staff does not recall filling out this a development review for 16 rental townhomes at form we inquired with Met Council. What we 2625 Highway 10 and renovation of the Red Oak found out was that this table just states that Apartments. The density of the townhomes is 7.4 Mounds View is not required to add more units units per acre, and the project design includes a but it does not mean that we are restricted from open green area and play area. They have receiving funding for adding more units. I dropped the lot at 7800 Eastwood. The land that wanted to make sure that Ramsey County was is still part of the application is zoned R-3 and interpreting this information correctly so that in multiple family dwellings are a permitted use. the future they may provide assistance to Mounds Development review is not subject to public View for projects that may add affordable hearings. They will need to replat the property, housing. and the plat will go through public hearings. Vacancy on Economic Development Building Inspection Commission: The addition to Cross of Glory Church passed Resident and Real Estate Agent Bev Tarhark has final inspection and the certificate of occupancy resigned from the Economic Development will be issued Thursday,May 29. The sprinklers Commission. I will be mailing out letter to a few have been installed in the addition and church residents who have expressed an interest sanctuary. • becoming more involved with the development of Mounds View. If you know of any residents that The construction drawings for both ZEP might be interested please let me know and I will Manufacturing and the Bel Rae have been farmed send them an application. out for plan review because we are overloaded, and the Bel Rae has a very tight schedule. Cathy We had approximately the same number of FINANCE building permits come in this month as the same month last year. Inspections are running about a The Auditors have arrived and will be working in week behind because of volume. the office the rest of this week and all of next week. The correction letter to Brian Aultman, who was the property owner who installed the roof at 2085 Diane provided the third graders of Pinewood Terrace Drive(Chad Harris' house)has been Elementary School with a tour of the City Hall drafted and sent to Bob Long for review. Chad offices on Thursday, May 22. The highlights of Harris also came into the office to review the the tour were the City Council chambers and who letter. got to sit in the mayor's chair, whether or not they were on television and could we turn on the Housing Programs microphones so they could speak. I thought for Inspections are proceeding on duplexes and their age they had some very interesting fourplexes. Jennifer has sent out the letters • questions. scheduling inspections for the larger apartment complexes, which will be happening in June. Diane 3THISISR JUNE 2-JUNE 6,1997 The invitation for bids on the city-owned lot at 8265 Spring Lake Road have been sent out to PARKS, RECREATION & seven builders and three interested homebuyers. A copy of the information package we sent out is FORESTRY attached. (This was breaking new ground for us- PARKS: -Jennifer worked very hard on pulling together Thanks to everyone that has been concerned this material. She did want everyone to know about Steve's finger which was severed and re- that the picture on the second page was in color attached last week. There is good news-the in the copies sent.) doctors report that the finger seems to have good ' circulation and it is predicted that the nail will Engineering regrow. There is feeling at the tip which is also Jim Hess gets 4-6 calls a day from residents good. Needless to say the injury is painful- asking for assistance on such questions as where Steve however was eager to get back on the job. sewer and water lines are located(when they We are happy to report that with his doctor's want to build out-buildings in their yards), why approval Steve is back at work performing light there is water in their yard and does it mean there duties. is a water main break(so far no...it is just wetter this year), whether they can extend landscaping Summer seasonals are all on-board, being trained next to wetlands, etc, etc. in and orientated to parks equipment, park THAT WAS THAT locations, work tasks, safety information etc. While the rainy weather this week will put us aFor the This Is It readers who are not on City back on mowing, it does give opportunity to Council: work at the Bel Rae moving equipment to the On May 27, 1997, the City Council approved the storage semi-truck.. rezoning ordinance for the O'Neil property, A proposal for upgrading Groveland Park changing it from B-1 and R-2 to PUD for playground is being prepared by MN Playground, commercial development). At the preceding incorporating current components(requiring meeting on May 12, the City Council approved some safety revisions) and adding additional the general concept plan and PUD stipulations for components. This proposal will be reviewed by the 16-screen movie theater, three office buildings staff and Parks and Recreation Commission and and two restaurant sites. This will allow the forwarded to Council in July. theater project to proceed to the next step which will be development plan review. RECREATION: Michael Schnur, summer intern, arrived Tuesday. Also on May 27, the City Council approved the Michael is a graduating senior in Parks and rezoning ordinance, general concept plan and Recreation Administration from LaCrosse PUD stipulations for the D.W. Jones project at University. He will be providing support in the Silver Lake Road and Highway 10. This project office, and supervision of summer playgrounds will include a gas station/car wash/convenience and Lakeside Park Beach. Michael's project will market/fast food restaurant, a sit down restaurant, be extensive evaluations of recreation programs, office building(s) and a senior citizen housing recreation participant evaluations, non-park user Alk development. It will also go through surveys, non participant surveys and department lir development plan review as the next step. policy review. Beingan objective"outside?'now P cy J Pam on the"inside"it is hoped that Michael will be 4 THIS ISR JUNE 2-JUNE 6,1997 able to provide us with data that can be used in week and will be seen by the doctor on June 2 for program development, facility use policy options another evaluation. Larry had a re-check and information on how to increase resident appointment today,May 29, and the doctor wants participation in recreation and encourage people him to start therapy also. (Larry has returned to who are not currently using the parks to enjoy work under certain restrictions.) them! I think Mike has a big project ahead of him! Cleanup day is this Saturday, and we've had a few residents drop off their"junk"because they The Edgewood Pool was down this last week and will not be in town or have to work this weekend. • required all classes to be canceled, to be re- We've had many residents call with questions or scheduled one week beyond the ending date. inquiries-hopefully that means it will be a busy Luckily the summer schedule does not interfere day! Our open house will be from 10 AM to with the extended week. Our summer swimming 2 PM also, hope to see everyone there. schedule did require revision because the week classes are to begin has just last week been pre- Tracy empted by Edgewood School for PE make-up classes for students who had incompletes. Since POLICE the school has priority use, our summer DARE graduation last Thursday was a fantastic swimming session dates have been changed. event. Mayor McCarty was the guest speaker. Recreation programs and activities are ready to The kids were into it and Tim Brennan did a great 40 go as soon as the students are out of school. job. Congratulations to all the Dare Graduates. We are bracing ourselves for the last week of Mary school and the first week of vacation. These two weeks can be very busy. PUBLIC WORKS A number of our officers are being trained on the On Thursday,May 22, the 3rd graders from operation of a new intoxilizer. The State says it Pinewood came through and toured our treatment will replace the old one shortly after our officers plant and the shop. They had good questions and are trained. we enjoyed them being here. The annual Law Enforcement Walleye A few more residents have called and reported Tournament will be held on Mille Lacs Lake on boulevard damage; those addresses will be Monday, June 2nd. We will be represented by assessed and taken care of. The guys noticed that four or five officers. at least four(4) of the residents that had sod delivered to them earlier, used the sod not on the After three weeks of not working, the MDT's in damaged boulevard, but in other areas of their the squads are partially working. Registrations lawn. (We will note this information on the sod and DL checks are still not available. list for next season). Tim Three(3) of our four(4) seasonals have started. (Todd, Ryan and Aaron, Kevin will start next • week.)We are happy to have them here! Wally is still out of work; he started therapy this CM OF ECONOMIC DEV. ATTACHMENT TO THIS IS IT 2Phone: (612)717-4000".11110iNDS W Fax: (612)784-3462 fr °grecs • PartnetS���S May 29, 1997 Judy Karon Community and Economic Development Office of the County Manager Ramsey County 250 Court House, 15 West Kellogg Blvd St. Paul, MN 55102 Dear Judy: As you know, earlier this year MSP Real Estate approached the City of Mounds View with a proposal to significantly rehabilitate the deteriorating Red Oak Apartments located on Highway 10 in Mounds View. The proposal includes the purchase of city-owned land • adjacent to the apartment complex to add 26 additional affordable townhome units. As part of the financial package for this project MSP Real Estate requested the use of HOME funds. When we met with your office to discuss the project,we learned that Ramsey County would only consider the use of HOME funds for the rehabilitation portion of the project because the City of Mounds View's negotiated goals with the Metropolitan Council under the Livable Communities Act which implied that we would not add any additional • affordable units within the City. In order to participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act(LCA), the City of Mounds View was required to negotiate goals and develop an action plan with the Metropolitan Council which would detail how we planned to provide our fair share of affordable housing. The City stated that our primary goal was to improve the quality of the existing housing stock. However, the City did not recall specifically stating in our goals or action plan that we would not add additional affordable units (Attachment A). To clear up our confusion, we spoke with Guy Peterson from the Metropolitan Council. He stated that the negotiated goals provided to Ramsey County (Attachment B) were put together by the Met Council to evaluate each city's situation. The zero's under additional rental and ownership units are merely a mathematical calculation based on the number of affordable units already provided by cities in Ramsey County and the forecast of the • number of units that might be needed to fill the LCA goals. According to Guy this table only means that to fulfill the LCA, Mounds View is not expected to provide additional MIM PRINTED TH 2401 Highway 10• Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 t..:6,SOYINK n, ‘ecydedoaw Page Two 11/1 Judy Karon May 29, 1997 affordable units. It does not mean that the City cannot add additional units to their housing stock. I wanted to pass this information along to you in hopes that it helps Ramsey County understand the City's position regarding affordable housing and to assist you in reviewing funding requests for Mounds View in the future. Thank you and I look forward to a successful HOME Funds project in Mounds View! Sincerely, � .�, , ya e Director Economic Development cc: Mounds View Council Chuck Whiting, City Administrator Bob Long, City Attorney i HOS Attachment �°• - Phone: (612) 784-3055 �� •,� 0EW Fax: (612) 784-3462 S°cess • Partnecsti�Q • • October 23, 1996 Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre • ATTN: Guy Peterson 230 East 5th Street • St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Guy. Enclosed is a certified copy of the City ofMounds View's resolution to participate in the Livable Communities Act for 1997. As indicated by,our housing benchmarks established by the Metropolitan Council, approximately 89% of single family houses in Mounds View are affordable indicating that we provide a large amount of affordable housing. The concern of the City of Mounds View is to continue to provide a wide variety of housing choices for our residents without losing the quality of the housing stock. Since the majority of housing in Mounds View was built in the 1950's, we are beginning to face an aging housing stock. It is an issue that must be addressed now to prevent future problems. When determining funding sources, we would Ince to see the Metropolitan Council provide funding for preserving the housing stock as well as providing affordable housing. With an aging housing stock, it is crucial to maintain the livability of the homes. We must provide affordable housing that is safe, decent and sanitary. If homes are affordable but not safe, decent and sanitary, we will face a Iarger problem in the future. The City of Mounds View is delighted to participate in the Livable Communities Act for 1997 and we hope that our recommendations for preset ving the current housing stock are given serious consideration. Sincerely, CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW • Jennifer B- gman E�9using Inspector WIT SCYINK 2401 Highway 10• Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 n HOUSING GOALS AGREEMENT METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT PRINCIPLES • The City of Mounds View supports: 1. A balanced housing supply,with housing available for people at all income levels. 2. The accommodation of all racial and ethnic groups in the purchase,sale,rental and location of housing within the community. 3. A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life-cycle. 4. A community of well-maintained housing and neighborhoods,including ownership and rental housing. 5. Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need variety of • housing types and costs. 6. The availability of a full range of services and facilities for its residents,and the improvement of access to and linkage between housing and employment GOALS To carry out the above housing principles,the City of Mounds View agrees to use benchmark indicators for communities of cimilar location and stage of development as affordable and life-cycle housing goals for the period 1996 to 2010,and to make its best efforts, given market conditions and resource availability,to maintain an index within the benchmark ranges for affordability,life-cycle and density. • •CITY INDEX BENCHMARK GOAL Affordability Ownership 89% 69-87% * Rerltal 54% 35-59% * Life-Cycle Type(Non-single family 43% 33-35% * detached) Owner/rental Mix 67/33% (75)/(25)% Density Single-Family Detached 2.3/acre 1.9-2.3/acre • Multifamily . 12/acre 10-13/acre To achieve the above goals,the City of Mounds View elects to participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Local Housing Incentives Program,and will prepare and submit a plan to the Metropolitan Council by June 30, 1996,indicating the actions it will take to carry out the above goals. *The City of Mounds View currenly meets or exceeds all goals expected by the Metropolitan Council CERTIFICATION Mayor Date STATE OF MINNESOTA) • ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified Clerk Administrator of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete copy thereof, insofar as the same relates to: Resolution No. 5010 Resolution Continuing to Participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under the Metropolitan Livable Community Act. Calendar Year 1997 WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Clerk Administrator and the corporate seal of the City of Mounds View this 23 of October, 1996 (SEAL) • Clerk Administrator • • • • • • RESOLI7TION NO. 5010 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION CONTINUING TO PARTICIPATE IN INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM THE LOCAL HOUSING CO ��T� THE LIVABLE SACT CALENDAR YEAR 1997 473.25WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Co • 473.254) Communities Act (Minnesota Statutes Section address to establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended r housing and other development, --Ivable Statutes section 473.121; and P sues racing mem°Podtan area defined o by Minnesota • WEEREAS, the Met-opoIitatt Livable Co • Vitalization Account, the Livable Communities Dues Fund, comprising the Tax Base ilk ' Incentives Account, is intended to provide=rain Demonstration Account and the Local Housing v.. • fuming and other as area municipalities; and assistance to metropolitan W , a mem 000utan area municip • under the Metropolitan I-ivable Co 'is not eligible to receive grants or loans • under Communities Funds or eligible to receive certain Binding from the Minnesota Dep '�polluted sites Department of Trade and Economic Development unless the ��ality is Participating in the Local Housing Inc Mrmesota Statutes neon 473e�v� Account Program under the .r54; and WHEREAS, the Me�opoiitan Livable Co . Council Communities Act requires the op° that Council municipality we ith each muniapauty,.o =bash affordable and life-cycle housinggoals with and promote the policies of the Metropolitan Councl asr provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development Guide; and WHEREAS, each muni�pality must identify to the M muni�paiiry plans to take to meet the �'opolrtan Council the actions the Housing Action Plan; and housing goals Preparation of the WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council adopted, by resolutionn after a public nearing, IIegotiated affordable and life-cycle housing goals for each participating municipality; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area muaicpality which elect • Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 orp� pein the Local each year; and WHEREAS, for calendar year 1997, a metropolitan area municipality participate in the Local Housing Incentive Account Prosram during that did not illparticipate under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 only if.. (a municipality Year 1996, can participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Pro elects and Metropolitan Council and the municipality �by November 15, 1996; (b) the pality have successfully negotiated affordable and life-cycle housing goals for the municipality. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Mounds View to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Pro hereby elects 1 Communities Act during the calendar year 1997. untie. the Metropolitan Livable Dated this 23rd day of Septembe, 1996. ATTEST: 4 , i Mayor (SEAL) �/ r , • City Admithrrator Attachment -.L 1\V •VVV 1 •Vt , i RAMSEY COUNTY Iii W • ADDITIONAL UNIT ESTIMATES BRED ON NEGOTIATED.LCA GOALS AND REVISED • BLUEPRINT GROWTH FORECASTS FOR 2010 0 -.'. '=R�„�'.x22=, '1,i ig„.. 7-7,-....., -«- .-�`"°"• 'fB "'1 idea Hills 2.904 $96 { 152 I -._. A 6 Falcon H 2,0I6 I34 -0- cizhts 2- 434 Land=dale 1.166 -0- Livia I 34 -0- -0- Canada 3- 1.093 -0. -0- T.m -0- 1.111111.1121110111 �' '` 11,496 f 3.504 632 I -0- 1 Mounds lcsv 4,702 498 770 3,523 677 I Noes Oaks L085 515 15 I 7 244 I :0- 307 - 31. St. 453Paul 4,4477 2 � -0- 1 � .. + . = 13,562 2....M ! -0- -0- / SL Paul � 110,249 7&3 39Z 6,75I -0- I_03I s:ty:_-aP 8-941 + 2.504 • 477 { .43- - '• 3.924 2276 200 1.260 I. 340 110 I. Bear T� 3.205 1.595 160I.126 L Wbise Beer Lk 3,902 1.300 ' -0- 991 0- -0` I ' r;=Tv ics 1s 190-360 I 24,473 2.353 1 797 6.603 S CM?'OF COMMUNITY DEV. ATTACHMENT TO- THIS IS IT © &Q) Phone: (612) 784-3055 Q EW Fax: (612) 784-3462 -Pess • Partnets'c S To: Residential Builders and Interested Home Buyers From: Jennifer Bergman, Mounds View EDA Subject: Notice of Residential Building Lots For Sale Date: May 22, 1997 The Mounds View Economic Development Authority (EDA) established the Housing Replacement Program to reduce the social costs of blight and increase the tax base. The purpose of the program is to replace deteriorating lower value housing on scattered sites throughout the City with larger, higher value housing designed for families. To accomplish this goal, the EDA purchases substandard homes, demolishes the home and sells the lot to prospective buyers for redevelopment. This will assist in eliminating the blighting influence of substandard housing and increasing the availability of quality housing for families. The EDA currently has a vacant site available for redevelopment. Please see the attached sheet for detailed information on this lot. In order to be considered, the builder must submit a proposal in writing by June 30, 1997. The proposal shall include the offer price of the lot, a description of the proposed new home including the number of bedrooms and bathrooms, and proposed estimated value of the new home. The EDA will only consider proposals from a licensed residential home builder who has identified a buyer to occupy the home upon its completion. Please submit proposals to: Mounds View EDA ATTN: Jennifer Bergman 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112. The selected builder must comply with the Housing Design and Site Criteria and enter into a Participation Agreement with the EDA (see attachments). Upon satisfactory negotiations, the builder/buyer team must submit a$500 participation fee and enter into a Contract for Private Development with the EDA within 30 days of signature of the Participation Agreement. The participation fee is non-refundable and non-transferable. The development of all sites shall meet the development objectives as set forth in the Housing Design and Site Criteria. These guidelines were created to ensure that the homes built on the identified lots blend in with the surrounding neighborhood and respond to the objective of the 4 Mounds View Housing Replacement Program. If you have any questions, please call Jennifer Bergman at 717-4023 or Cathy Bennett at 717-4002. PAINTED WITH 2401 Highway 10 • Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 SOY INK TM IOW.recycled paint Equal ODDortunrty Employer 1. LOT FOR SALE • BY THE MOUNDS VIEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 8265 SPRING LAKE ROAD MOUNDS VIEW, MN Setback Requirements: Front Yard: 30 feet Rear Yard: 30 feet Side Yard: 10 feet _ 1. , . . '�it 7.,...t•-•14,04..' .y°^4' .--1 �."v.i .— .. .,, ilt".. -4-r -..I.t,S..4 *. . i ? ar 'ter• t' fits.t l et,92-,...r.,--,-.-4-.41‘,./r...,-.w .-fit a,:. ' �,• • lt +�. 4 s -'-,,,.:,---.-c.,-,' , d.,; t. s i v x fi ,t, ,,,-.,,..,,,,i.„-,...,,. 'T.,•• ..• ."'T .:1:,-42,,„_.-- -''• '..' '`;,- vi,...ts..c,N, ..-_,' -• - ,,•,,- ,f1.-,crt)_ - - . ,st, .-. — —. ...., -., 511-4,...;,..,-,,,,:i.pr.,----;.,...,.:,-.,. t.',.-1--il.,!. , .„.... iill, .� t `�.t 7_T• t .�.�wn'f..• sj•�j 1 .-.+t�'•a� "trV' Yap ..:,...,:-...--,:f.;.., )L'•' } _• i S 1 !.., ':-.../-;:,5-- .-: ...B' �, ..`ems_` .`!�•rk.,...,., .- 0=' ,,,....,,,e-...... .'�-- -- '-_ ,�-. View: East from Spring Lake Road 0 OF z 1H Y ix 218.0 Z CD 8265 Spring Lake Road N it A ci dl CO • ARDAN AVENUE Ogress ' Partnel- 7 I • Housing Design and Site Criteria The Mounds View Economic Development Authority (EDA) established the Housing Replacement Program to reduce the social costs of blight and increase the tax base. The purpose of the program is to replace deteriorating lower value housing on scattered sites throughout the City with larger, higher value housing designed for families. To accomplish this goal, the EDA purchases substandard homes, demolishes the home and sells the lot to a prospective buyers for redevelopment. This will assist in eliminating the blighting influence of substandard housing and increasing the availability of quality housing for families. 1. General a. The lot must be purchased by a buyer/developer team. b. The developer must be a licensed contractor. All sub-contractors must also be licensed. 1111 c. The developer/buyer team must enter into a Contract for Private Development with the EDA which will specify design, set site criteria and establish value based upon new home construction in the surrounding area. d. Home design must comply with all federal, state and local building codes. e. The house must be able to be built within six(6) months from the time the Contract for Private Development is executed. An extension may be granted with the permission of the EDA. f. Each home must be single-family, owner occupied. 2. Building Standards a. All building plans must have been prepared in consultation with an Architect or Architectural Designer with a minimum two year technical degree. Housing design is a critical concern. b. A minimum of three bedrooms is required. Page 1 c. Two full bathrooms are preferred. A home design with 11/2 baths will be considered. d. A two-car attached garage is required. e. Exterior materials (siding, doors and windows) should be low maintenance. Aluminum and vinyl are preferred. Natural cedar lap is acceptable if properly stained or painted. Hardboard panels or hardboard lap siding are not acceptable. f. Unit height and mass of the new homes shall be compatible with the scale of the surrounding neighborhood. g. Plans must present a balanced distribution of wall and window areas from all views. h. A full basement shall be provided in the house unless the selected design results in a split level, garden level type of basement. 3. Site Standards a. The entire grounds shall be landscaped to be aesthetically pleasing in all seasons. Land forms and plant materials shall be used to define the site and blend with adjoining properties. The landscape plan must be reviewed by the City Forester. b. Existing trees shall be preserved when possible. Care should be taken to preserve existing root systems. Construction fencing around the root system must be provided on trees directly adjacent to active grading and construction areas. The City Forester can assist in recommending methods of protecting existing trees and shrubs. c. Site drainage shall be accommodated on the site so that water is directed away from the new home and the neighboring properties. The developer must comply with any federal, state or local drainage requirements. Construction and the finished structure must not have a detrimental impact on storm water drainage patterns in the neighborhood. d. All air conditioning units must be located in the rear yard of the house. Page 2 e. Utility meters shall be screened from street view; locations must be specified • on plans. f. The neighboring property and adjacent public streets shall be kept free of construction debris at all times. The construction site shall be managed so not to become a nuisance. Under no circumstance during the construction period shall construction workers, construction equipment or construction materials enter, disturb, or damage neighboring properties. 4. Builder Requirements a. Demonstrate financial capability by providing: (1) A statement from a financial institution of sufficient construction capital (2) A letter of credit of the value of the lot (3) A summary of the financial conditions of the company (4) Evidence of a construction loan or ability to secure one b. Possess adequate Builder's Risk, Comprehensive General Liability and Worker's Compensation insurance coverage. • c. Posses a Home Owners Warranty insurance or equivalent toP erform warranted repairs required by Minnesota State Statute. d. Provide references from: (1) Five customers; (2) Three major suppliers, one being the construction lumber supplier; (3) Building Inspectors from two cities in which the builder has constructed new housing within the past three years. e. Provide information on inventory of homes that builder currently has under construction. 5. Buyer Requirements a. Must be pre-approved for permanent financing prior to signing Contract for Private Development. Page 3 MOUNDS VIEW HOUSING REPLACEMENT PROGRAM • PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 19_, by and between the ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, a body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota, having its principal office at 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 (EDA) and , a Minnesota , having its principal office at . (Developer) In consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations of the EDA and the Developer, the parties do hereby covenant and agree as follows:. 1. The Developer agrees to pay $500 to the EDA for the rights to participate in redevelopment of a property owned by the EDA in accordance with the guidelines of the Mounds View EDA's Housing Replacement Program. 2. In return for$500, the receipt of which from the Developer is hereby acknowledged by the EDA, the EDA grants to the Developer the exclusive right to enter into a contract to redevelop the property located at and legally described as in accordance with • the Mounds View EDA's Housing Replacement Program. This right will expire on , 19_, unless, prior thereto, the Developer and the EDA have executed a Contract for Private Development with regard to the property. 3. The EDA agrees to negotiate in good faith with the Developer regarding redevelopment of the property but nothing contained in this Agreement shall require the EDA to enter into a Contract for Private Development if, at the EDA's sole discretion, it deems such not to be in its best interests. 4. The fee paid by the Developer to the EDA in connection with this Agreement for participation in the EDA's Housing Replacement Program is non-refundable and non- transferable to any other property or site owned by the EDA. DEVELOPER EDA By: By: Its President Its By: Its Executive Director