HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1997/08/25 • 11011101110.1.101.1.111111111111.1111111111111110!!!” !"Miiiiiiri.OMMiniiiiiMMINEMERNiiiigilii:iniiMiiiiiMMER
The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by staff and appointed commissions,
committees and boards. Decisions are based on this information, as well as City policy and practices, input from
constituents and a Councilmember's personal judgement. If you have comments,questions or information regarding an
item on the agenda,please step forward to be recognized by the Mayor during the "Residents Requests and Comments
From the Floor"item on the agenda. Please state your name and address for the record. All comments are appreciated.
A copy of all printed materials relating to the agenda item is available for public inspection at the Recording Secretary's
Table.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
McCarty
Stigney Koopmeiners Trude Quick
4. AGENDA ADDITIONS
Item 1:
Item 2:
Item 3:
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
August 11, 1997- City Council Meeting and August 18, 1997 - Special Work Session
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
6. ACCEPTANCE OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES
Planning Commission, May 21, 1997; June 4, 1997; June 18, 1997
7. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS
411, Presentation of plaque to outgoing City Councilmember Julie Trude.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approve Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds.
City Council Agenda i
Page 2
B. Declare Groveland Playground Equipment(except swings and slide) as surplus •
equipment and authorize staff to discard in the most cost efficient manner. Staff
Report No. 97-2190C
C. LICENSES FOR APPROVAL
Asphalt- expires June 30. 1998
Pioneer Blacktop, Inc. -New
MVAC - expires June 30, 1998
Apollo Heating& Ventilating Corp. -Renewal
Equipment Supply, Inc. -New
Michael's HHH-New
Woodlund Homes -New
Sewer/Water- expires June 30. 1998
Piperight Plumbing-New
Masonry - expires June 30. 1998
M.J. Arndt Construction Co. -Renewal
Dog Kennel - expires August 31. 1998 •
Commercial
Sham-O-Jet Kennels-Renewal
Residential
Harry and Mary Niezgocki-Renewal
9. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOD
Citizens'comments are encouraged to allow individual citizens to address the Council,as a whole,on a matter
of interest or concern to the citizens. The preservation of the Citizens'Comments item on the agenda is
important in order to encourage and maintain this information flow. To preserve and protect this valuable
communications link a speaker is limited to three(3)minutes.
CITIZENS:
BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7:05 p.m. Public Hearing to Consider Ordinance No. 603, An Ordinance Amending the
Mounds View Municipal Code by Amending Chapter 1005 Entitled"Housing
Code." Staff Report No. 97-2191C. (Staff Presenter:Jennifer Bergman, Housing
Inspector) 410
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
City Council Agenda
Page 3
• 7:10 Public Hearing and Consideration of the Preliminary Plat Request for Silverview
Estates, a Planned Unit Development at the Southeast Corner of Highway 10 and
Silver Lake Road. Staff Report No. 97-2192C (Staff Presenter:Jim Ericson,
Planning Associate)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
11 . COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. Consideration of Adoption of Ordinance No. 602, An Ordinance Related to
Wetland Zoning Regulations and Amending Title 1000, Chapter 1010, Sections
1010.07, 1010.08, and 1010.09 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. Staff
Report No. 97-2193C (Presented by:Jim Ericson, Community Development)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
• B. Consideration of Resolution 5151, a Resolution Approving a Development Review
for McDonalds Restaurant located at 2101 Highway 10. Staff Report No. 97-
2194C (Presented by:Jim Ericson, Planning Associate)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
C. Approval to offer Community Development Director Position. Staff Report No.
97-2195C (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
D. Consideration of Resolution Approving the Lease Agreement Between the City of
Mounds View and Independent School District No. 621 and Authorzing the
Mayor and Clerk-Administrator to Execute the Lease on Behalf of the City. Staff
Report No. 97-2196C. (Presented by: Cathy Bennett, Director of Economic
Development)
• COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
City Council Agenda
Page 4
•
12. REPORTS
1. Report of Councilmembers:
Trude:
Koopmeiners:
Stigney:
Quick:
2. Report of Mayor McCarty:
3. Report of Clerk Administrator:
4. Report of Staff
1111
5. Report of Attorney:
Next Council Work Session: Tuesday, September 2, 1997 at 6:00 p.m.
Next Council Meeting: September 8, 1997 at 7:00 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
I
a
•
The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by staff and appointed commissions,
committees and boards. Decisions are based on this information, as well as City policy and practices, input from
constituents anda Councilmember's personal judgement. If you have comments,questions or information regarding an
item on the agenda,please step forward to be recognized by the Mayor during the "Residents Requests and Comments
From the Floor"item on the agenda. Please state your name and address for the record All comments are appreciated
A copy of all printed materials relating to the agenda item is available for public inspection at the Recording Secretary's
Table.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
McCarty
Stigney Koopmeiners Trude Quick
• 4. AGENDA ADDITIONS
Item 1:
Item 2:
Item 3:
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
August 11, 1997 - City Council Meeting and August 18, 1997- Special Work Session
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
6. ACCEPTANCE OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES
Planning Commission, May 21, 1997; June 4, 1997; June 18, 1997
7. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS
• Presentation of plaque to outgoing City Councilmember Julie Trude.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approve Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds.
City Council Agenda
Page 2
B. Declare Groveland Playground Equipment (except swings and slide) as surplus •
equipment and authorize staff to discard in the most cost efficient manner. Staff
Report No. 97-2190C
C. LICENSES FOR APPROVAL
Asphalt - expires June 30, 1998
Pioneer Blacktop, Inc. -New
HVAC - expires June 30. 1998
Apollo Heating& Ventilating Corp. -Renewal
Equipment Supply, Inc. -New
Michael's HHH-New
Woodlund Homes-New
Sewer/Water- expires June 30. 1998
Piperight Plumbing -New
Masonry - expires June 30. 1998
M.J. Arndt Construction Co. -Renewal
Dog Kennel - expires August 31, 1998
Commercial
Sham-O-Jet Kennels-Renewal
Residential
Harry and Mary Niezgocki-Renewal
9. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOD
Citizens'comments are encouraged to allow individual citizens to address the Council,as a whole, on a matter
of interest or concern to the citizens. The preservation of the Citizens'Comments item on the agenda is
important in order to encourage and maintain this information flow. To preserve and protect this valuable
communications link a speaker is limited to three(3)minutes.
CITIZENS:
BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7:05 p.m. Public Hearing to Consider Ordinance No. 603, An Ordinance Amending the
Mounds View Municipal Code by Amending Chapter 1005 Entitled"Housing
Code." Staff Report No. 97-2191C. (Staff Presenter:Jennifer Bergman, Housing
Inspector)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
•
Comments:
City Council Agenda
Page 3
• 7:10 Public Hearing and Consideration of the Preliminary Plat Request for Silverview
Estates, a Planned Unit Development at the Southeast Corner of Highway 10 and
Silver Lake Road. Staff Report No. 97-2192C (Staff Presenter:Jim Ericson,
Planning Associate)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
11 . COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. Consideration of Adoption of Ordinance No. 602, An Ordinance Related to
Wetland Zoning Regulations and Amending Title 1000, Chapter 1010, Sections
1010.07, 1010.08, and 1010.09 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. Staff
Report No. 97-2193C (Presented by:Jim Ericson, Community Development)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
• B. Consideration of Resolution 5151, a Resolution Approving a Development Review
for McDonalds Restaurant located at 2101 Highway 10. Staff Report No. 97-
2194C (Presented by:Jim Ericson, Planning Associate)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
C. Approval to offer Community Development Director Position. StaffReport No.
97-2195C (Presented by: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
D. Consideration of Resolution Approving the Lease Agreement Between the City of
Mounds View and Independent School District No. 621 and Authorzing the
Mayor and Clerk-Administrator to Execute the Lease on Behalf of the City. Staff
Report No. 97-2196C. (Presented by: Cathy Bennett, Director of Economic
Development)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
City Council Agenda
Page 4
•
12. REPORTS
1. Report of Councilmembers:
Trude:
Koopmeiners:
Stigney:
Quick:
2. Report of Mayor McCarty:
3. Report of Clerk Administrator:
4. Report of Staff:
5. Report of Attorney:
Next Council Work Session: Tuesday, September 2, 1997 at 6:00 p.m.
Next Council Meeting: September 8, 1997 at 7:00 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
August 22, 1997
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator
Re: August 25, 1997 City Council Meeting
The meeting should be much shorter than it would have been had the MSP agreement been on.
Despite contacting the newspapers, no word on the Council's action last Monday night has been
printed in the media. Two letters to the editor were printed regarding Mounds View and this project,
and people may still think the agreement is on the agenda. If Council members get asked, it has been
removed as the Council voted last Monday. Next week's papers should have this item reported. Ben
Chanco reported the election filing dates, but not the MSP issue.
On the agenda for Monday evening, under Special Order of Business, Julie Trude will be recognized
for her work on the Council. Don't forget the reception here at City Hall starting at 6 p.m.
On the Consent Agenda, Item 8B: the Groveland Playground Equipment item may raise some
questions from Council. Basically, the equipment needs to be discarded although it may not be able
to be auctioned as per the policy I drafted. A resident may be interested in the equipment, but I think
it would be inappropriate to give or sell them the equipment, and I don't think it is practical to
advertise and take bids. What should be done is to have the equipment disposed of, and if someone
• still wants the equipment, they can talk with the disposal company. Otherwise, we may never get
anything thrown away around here.
Under Council Business, Item 11C: I am asking the Council to give conditional approval to hiring
Richard Jopke as the new Community Development Director pending criminal background and drug
testing checks, and agreement on starting salary and date. As a backup, approval for Coralee Fox
is also requested pending Jopke's checks. Both resumes are enclosed in your packet. Mr. Jopke has
20 years of experience as a planner for Roseville and Richfield and I am confident he will do an
excellent job with the City. I need to discuss with him more fully the salary for the position and
starting date, and may need to contact Council members next week if any special conditions need
apply. My request therefore is to have the Council move to give approval to offering the Community
Development Director position to Rick Jopke pending completion of background, and offering the
position to Coralee Fox as a backup.
There more of course going on, but my time is up. Have a good weekend and see you on Monday
evening at 6 p.m.
•
• AuguPastge 111: 1997
Mounds View City Council
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
9 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
10 RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA
11
12 Regular Meeting
13
14 August 11, 1997
15 Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View,MN 55112
16 **********************************************************************************
17
18 CALL TO ORDER
19
4020 The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Acting Mayor Koopmeiners at 7:00 p.m.on August 11,
21 1997.
22
23 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
24
25 ROLL CAL L
26
27 MEMBERS PRESENT: Council members Trude,
28 Quick,Koopmeiners and Stigney
29
30 MEMBERS ABSENT: Mayor McCarty
31
32 ALSO PRESENT: Chuck Whiting,Clerk Administrator
33 Pam Sheldon,Community Development Director
34 Jim Ericson,Planning Associate
35 Scott Riggs,City Attorney
36
37
38 ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA:
39
40 Mr.Whiting asked that an item be added to the agenda, 11 (B)(2) Setting a Public Hearing for Monday,
41 August 25, 1997 at 7:10 p.m.to consider the preliminary plat for the Silver Lake Estates project.
42
43 Council member Stigney asked that an item be added to the agenda, 11(G)Discussion on Inner-City/Inner-Staff
44 Communication.
45
40 46 APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
47
48 July 29,1997-City Council Meeting:
UNAPPR OVED
Page 2
August 11, 1997
•
Mounds View City Council
1 Trude/Quick to approve the July 29, 1997 City Council Meeting Minutes as presented in writing.
2
3 Council member Stigney stated he would like to see the EDA Public Hearing minutes included as part of the
4 record for the City Council meeting minutes of July 29, 1997. Additionally,Page 4,line 47 should be
5 changed to read,"Mayor McCarty recessed the City Council meeting at 8:15 p.m.to hold the EDA Public
6 Hearing in regard to the sale of land located at 2625 Highway 10 for the purposes of a Redevelopment Project".
7
8 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to TABLE approval of the July 28, 1997 City Council Minutes.
9
10 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
11
12 ACCEPTANCE OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES:
13
14 Festival Committee Meeting Minutes,July 1,1997
15 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes,June 26,1997
16
17 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to accept the Festival Committee Meeting Minutes,July 1, 1997 and the
18 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes,June 26, 1997.
19
20 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
21
•
22 CONSENT AGENDA:
23
24 Mr.Whiting presented the Consent Agenda as follows:
25
26 A. Approve Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds.
27
28 B. Set a Public Hearing for Monday,August 25, 1997 at 7:05 p.m.to Consider Ordinance No.603,An
29 Ordinance Amending the Mounds View Municipal Code by Amending Chapter 1005 Entitled"Housing Code".
30
31 C. LICENSES FOR APPROVAL:
32
33 Cigarettes and Tobacco-Expires June 30. 1998
34 Chou Vang,Murzyn Liquors-New
35
36 General(Commercial)-Expires June 30. 1998
37 A.E.Wallen Homes-New
38
39 HVAC-Expires June 30. 1998
40 A.R.E.Plumbing-New
41 Faircon Service-New
42 More's Burner Service-Renewal
43 River City Sheet Metal,Inc. -New
44
45 Masonry-Expires June 30. 1998
46 Neeck Construction,Inc.-New
47 Steve Zebro Cement Co.-New
48
Au st111997 JUAFPRO\ILD•
Mounds View City Council
1 Sewer and Water-Expires June 30. 1998
2 Kuehn Excavating-New
3
4 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Quick to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
5
6 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
7
8 RESIDENTS REOUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR:
9
10 Acting Mayor Koopmeiners explained that this is the time for residents to address the council with concerns on
11 items that are not on the Agenda.
12
13 Ms.Pamela Sheldon,7640 Woodlawn Drive,took this opportunity to thank the City Council,Planning
14 Commission,city staff and residents for the opportunity to work with such a fine group of people over the past
15 year. She noted that it has indeed been one of the best experiences of her career.
16
17 Mr.Whiting read a plaque which he then presented to Ms.Sheldon on behalf of the City Council,
18 acknowledging her for her dedicated service to the City of Mounds View.
19
20 William Werner,2765 Sherwood Road,asked if the$230,000 Tax Increment Financing Loan which MSP Real
. 21 Estate is requesting as a part of the Silver Lake Commons Project is a deferred interest loan.
22
23 Mr.Whiting explained that it is a loan with a deferred payment,having a 1%annually incurred interest with a
24 balloon payment at the end of the 30-year term.
25
26 Mr.Werner stated if MSP Real Estate paid$2,000 per year interest over 30 years,it would amount to
27 $60,000. If the$230,000 were invested it could double within 15 years. It seems to him that this is a very
28 good deal for the developer and he feels it would be helpful for the Council to explain this more thoroughly to
29 the residents.
30
31 Bruce Braesele,5127 Long Lake Road,stated as a Planning Commissioner he voted in favor of Silver Lake
32 Commons as he had no legal basis for not doing so. As a resident,however,he opposes the project as he feels
33 Mounds View has an adequate number of low-income housing units,with a higher percentage than any other
34 suburb in the Twin Cities area. Furthermore,he was not aware that the developer would be asking for Tax
35 Increment Financing in addition to obtaining a grant from the City of Minneapolis. Taking this into
36 consideration,he wonders how much risk the developer is really taking and therefore how much interest they
37 really have in the project. He also has some concern with this particular developer as they seem to want to
38 "railroad"this development through. He stated he feels the city would be better off strictly enforcing the
39 housing codes which would force the owners to make necessary improvements to the existing apartments. He
40 feels perhaps if a"for sale"townhouse project were put in the area,residents would take more of an interest in
41 their property. As a resident,he is strongly opposed to the project.
42
43 David Jahnke,8428 Eastwood Road,stated he has a lot of reservations as to the Silver Lake Commons
44 development project as well. He is not sure that grouping low income families together in a development is
45 really helping those families. He also wondered why the public hearing for the development project was not
40 46 published in the Focus or the New Brighton Bulletin newspapers. It appears that the notice was only
47 published in the St.Paul Pioneer Press. In regard to the city's inability to market the property commercially,
48 he does not feel that one year is a significant time to have commercial property on the market. He asked that
UPJAPPR .0VE9 Page 4
August 11, 1997 •
Mounds View City Council
1 the Council would seriously reconsider the proposal before the August 25th date. He noted that the residents
2 are very concerned.
3
4 Acting Mayor Koopmeiners stated the Council will consider the questions brought forth and will respond to
5 them accordingly.
6
7 Sherry Gunn,8120 Red Oak Court,asked if there were city regulations and codes in regard to the sale of guns
8 and ammunition in Mounds View, or if this were strictly state regulated.
9
10 Mr.Whiting stated he would have staff check on this. Acting Mayor Koopmeiners stated he believes this is
11 governed by both the city and State.
12
13 A resident at 8475 Eastwood Road,stated she just recently found out about the Silver Lake Commons project
14 and feels this is the case for many in her area. She noted how two similar proposals in the cities of Maple
15 Grove and Blaine were denied by their City Councils after residents strongly protested.
16
17 William Werner,2765 Sherwood Road,stated Commissioners seem to take a very narrow view in making
18 recommendations to the Council. He asked if the it would be possible for the Mayor to provide descriptions as
19 to the responsibilities for members of the various commissions.
20 .21 Cameron Obert,8315 Greenwood Drive,stated the Planning Commission does a lot of the investigative work
22 for the City Council. The commissioners help to do the background work and serve as an advisory to the City
23 Council. In regard to the Silver Lake Commons project,he also is opposed to the development project,
24 however he cannot offer an alternative. Therefore,his advise to the Council and staff is to take time to
25 thoroughly research this development proposal before they make a final decision.
26
27 PUBLIC BEARINGS:
28
29 Public Hearing and Consideration of the transfer of the off-sale intoxicating liquor license for Murzyn
30 Liquors,2840 Highway 10 to Chou Yang.
31
32 Acting Mayor Koopmeiners opened the Public Hearing at 7:50 p.m.
33
34 Mr.Whiting explained that Chou Vang is purchasing Murzyn Liquors and is therefore requesting that the
35 liquor license be transferred into his name. Background checks made by the Police Department do not indicate
36 any reason to deny this request.
37
38 A discussion followed in regard to the proposed name for the business. James Karels,owner of Murzyn
39 Liquor stated that Mr. Vang is considering Cheap Liquor. Council member Stigney asked if Mr.Vang would
40 consider other names for the business. Mr.Karels stated that he believes Mr. Vang would be open to
41 suggestions. It was suggested that Mr. Vang contact the Chamber of Commerce to see if they could offer
42 suggestions.
43
44 The public hearing was closed at 7:57 p.m.
45
46 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Quick to approve the transfer of the off-sale intoxicating liquor license for
47 Murzyn Liquors,2840 Highway 10 to Chou Vang.
•
48
(JNAPPROVED•
August 11, 1997
Mounds View City Council
1 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
2
3 Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No.602,An Ordinance Related to Wetland Zoning
4 Regulations and Amending Title 1000,Chapter 1010,Sections 1010.07,1010.08 and 1010.09 of the
5 Mounds View Municipal Code.
6
7 Acting Mayor Koopmeiners opened the Public Hearing at 7:58 p.m.
8
9 Mr.Jim Ericson,Planning Associate,briefly summarized the changes which would made to Section 1010 as a
10 result of the approval of the Ordinance. In essence,anyone living within 100 feet of a wetland will find it
11 easier to make changes on their properties.
12
13 The public hearing was closed at 8:00 p.m.
14
15 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to approve the First Reading of Ordinance No.602,An Ordinance Related
16 to Wetland Zoning Regulations and Amending Title 1000,Chapter 1010,Sections 1010.07, 1010.08 and
17 1010.09 of the Mounds View Municipal Code,and to waive the reading.
18
19 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
• 20
21 Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution No.5145,A Resolution Approving a Conditional Use
22 Permit for Children's Home Society at 5394 Edgewood Drive.
23
24 The Public Hearing was opened at 8:00 p.m.
25
26 Mr.Ericson provided a summary of the Conditional Use Permit request for Children's Home Society. He noted
27 that this day care center would be located in the Mounds view Community Center at 5394 Edgewood Drive,
28 providing care for up to 98 children. The facility would consist of 9,375 square feet.
29 He provided information in regard to the outside play area, parking and access to the facility,etc.
30
31 The Public Hearing was closed at 8:05 p.m.
32
33 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Quick to Approve Resolution No.5145,A Resolution Approving a Conditional
34 Use Permit for Children's Home Society at 5394 Edgewood Drive.
35
36 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
37
38 COUNCIL BUSINESS:
39
40 A. Review Community Development Quarterly Report.
41
42 This item was removed per request of staff,however Mr. Whiting stated staff would continue to keep the
43 Council updated in regard to building permits,projects,etc.
44
45 B. Consideration of Resolution No.5147,Approving a Minor Subdivision at 7720-7730 Silver Lake
481 46 Road.
47
Mr A nnonurn
Page
August 11, 1997
Mounds View City Council
1 Mr.Ericson explained that this request is for a subdivision to create two separate lots of a site which now
2 contains a twin home. He noted that both sites would be above the minimum lot size. The subdivision
3 would allow either side of the twin home to be purchased as an owner-occupied unit.
4
5 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to Approve Resolution No.5147,Approving a Minor Subdivision at
6 7720-7730 Silver Lake Road.
7
8 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
9
10 B.(2.) Setting a Public Hearing for Monday,August 25,1997 at 7:10 p.m.to Consider a Resolution for
11 a Preliminary Plat for Silver View Estates Development located at the Southeast Corner of Silver Lake
12 Road and Highway 10.
13
14 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to Set a Public Hearing for Monday,August 25, 1997 at 7:10 p.m.to
15 Consider a Resolution for a Preliminary Plat for Silver View Estates Development located at the Southeast
16 Corner of Silver Lake Road and Highway 10.
17
18 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
19
20 It was asked if this Public Hearing notice would be published in the Focus Newspaper or the New Brighton
•
21 Bulletin. Mr.Ericson explained that the notice did not meet the deadline for either of these papers,but would
22 be published in the St.Paul Pioneer Press.
23
24 Council member Trude asked that in situations such as this,that a notice be published,as required in the St.
25 Paul Pioneer Press,but that a notice also be published in the Bulletin so that residents have information of the
26 meeting prior to the public hearing.
27
28 C. Review Tentative Approval of Hiring for Community Development Director Position.
29
30 Mr.Whiting stated interviews for the position of Community Development Director were conducted,however
31 he has not come to a conclusion and would like to perform necessary background checks. He would like to
32 bring a recommendation before the Council at the August 25th Council Meeting.
33
34 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to Table this item until the August 25, 1997 City Council meeting.
35
36 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
37
38 D. Review Exclusive Negotiations Agreement with Anthony Properties regarding City-Owned
39 Properties Adjacent to Edgewood Drive and Highway 10 and the Community Center Property.
40
41 Mr.Whiting explained that this item was briefly discussed at the last Council Work Session. Anthony
42 Properties has expressed interest in talking with the City about developing office space on city-owned property
43 in front of city hall. The developer has only briefly discussed ideas for the site,mentioning up to 130,000
44 square feet of office space. Mr.Whiting stated he has contacted the University of MN Urban Design Center
45 who helped the city on the ring-road concept,and asked them to provide ideas as to whether or not the city
46 should pursue this. He noted that a copy of the Exclusive Negotiations Agreement was provided for Council
47 review and that its purpose is to have the developer commit$5,000 to the city to cover city time and expenses
48 for investigating this type of request. The term of the agreement would be 120 days.
,. I pi\ I il nonnli
Page 7 Ua , PPuOvLD
• August 11, 1997
Mounds View City Council
1 Council member Stigney stated he would not want to conduct negotiations on any city-owned property without
2 input from the residents. Mr.Whiting explained that the developer does not have anything to present at this
3 time,and if the city is going to investigate it further,they should get something from the developer to
4 compensate the city,for the time spent. Also the city should get some type of schedule from the developer so
5 that something can be brought before residents for input.
6
7 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Approve the Exclusive Negotiations Agreement with Anthony
8 Properties and to empower the Mayor and the Clerk Administrator to enter into an Exclusive Negotiations
9 Agreement with Anthony Properties.
10 f
11 VOTE: 2-ayes 2 nays(Stigney/Trude) Motion Fails
12
13 E. Council Acceptance of Council Member Julie Trude's Resignation.
14
15 Mr.Whiting explained that Ms.Trude's resignation would be effective September 1, 1997.
16
17 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Accept the Resignation of Council Member Julie Trude,
18 effective September 1, 1997.
19
40 20 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
21
22 F. Council Setting of Date for Special Election.
23
24 Mr.Whiting suggested that the Special Election be scheduled for Tuesday,November 4, 1997.
25
26 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to Set the Date for the Special Election on Tuesday,November 4, 1997.
27
28 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
29
30 G. Communication.
31
32 Council member Stigney stated he would like to see improvements in communication(Council with residents,
33 Council with staff,internally-Management with staff,etc.). At one time he asked about the possibility of a
34 phone hook up in the Council Chambers to allow residents to call in with questions and comments. He would
35 like to ask the Council to direct staff to look at how they think the Council can improve communication. He
36 feels the city should more effectively use the newsletter and publications to get information out that residents
37 have interest in.
38
39 Council member Trude stated she thinks it would be great if the city were able to take a more pro-active
40 approach toward communicating with residents.
41
42 It was the general `(onsensus of the Council to direct staff to try to make communication a priority.
43
44 Mr.Whiting stated he agrees with the importance of communication,but feels the council needs to talk about
45 how much effort and expense the city wants to incur to make communication a priority for the city. Anything
lip46 the Council can do in giving direction to the staff would be appreciated and they would certainly look at those
47 objectives.
48
; NI r, rivE
ti
Page 8 130
410
August 11, 1997
Mounds View City Council
1 Council member Stigney stated he would like input from residents as well as to how the city could improve
2 communication.
3
4 REPORTS:
5
6 Report of Council members:
7
8 Trude: Council member Trude noted that she voted against the agenda issue pertaining to an Exclusive
9 Negotiations Agreement with Anthony Properties as she feels the Community Center will demand much
10 parking and she does not want to take away from areas that could be used for parking if needed. In regard to
11 the Silver Lake Commons project,she also stated she has heard from many residents who are concerned about
12 adding more multi-family housing on Highway 10. Mounds View needs strong families and strong
13 commitments in order to make it a better place to live and she has concerns that with the rising number of
14 rental units,the city will not maintain a high enough stable portion of the population to keep Mounds View a
15 good place to raise a family. She encouraged residents to provide input on the Silver Lake Commons project
16 prior to the August 25th Council meeting or to be present at the meeting.
17
18 Stigney: Council member Stigney noted that St Paul has a three-strike program whereby residents are
19 individually charged if they have more than three police calls to the residence. He asked if staff could arrange
20 to get a copy of the program. He also provided an update on the landscape issue at Spots Quick Lube.
21
22 Quick: No report.
23
24 Koopmeiners: No report.
. 25
26 Report of Clerk Administrator: Mr.Whiting informed the Council that Phyllis Blanchard was recently
27 hospitalized but that she is reported to be home and recovering.
28
29 Report of Staff: No report
30
31 Report of Attorney: No report
32
33 Acting Mayor Koopmeiners adjourned the August 11, 1997 City Council Meeting at 9:05 p.m.
34
35 Respectfully submitted,36
37 JJG1'Y110.0..b•. /176
3 8 Tamara D. Saefke
39 Recording Secretary
40
41
42
43
44
45
46 S 47
48
APPROVED
• July 28e 1997
Mounds View City Council
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
July 28, 1997
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View,MN 55112
**********************************************************************************
CALL TO ORDER
• The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:00 p.m.on July 28, 1997.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor McCarty,Council members Trude,
Quick,Koopmeiners and Stigney
ALSO PRESENT: Chuck Whiting,Clerk Administrator
Pam Sheldon,Community Development Director
Cathy Bennett,Director of Economic Development
Jim Ericson,Planning Associate
Bob Long,City Attorney
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
Mayor McCarty took this opportunity to read a Proclamation proclaiming July 28, 1997 as Alice and Harry
Johnson Day in recognition of their 75th Wedding Anniversary. Mr.Johnson and his son and daughter-in-law
were present to accept the proclamation on behalf of the family.
Mayor McCarty noted that at the last Council meeting he acknowledged a number of people wly,,. i
in the Festival in the Park Celebration. At that time,he failed to acknowledge Post 761,Indianhead Council
who had 32 members help with the event. He extended his apologies and gratitude.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA:
There were no additions to the Agenda.
APPROVED
Page 2
July 28, 1997
Mounds View City Council
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
July 14,1997-City Council Meeting:
MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Koopmeiners to approve the minutes of the July 14, 1997 City Council meeting
as presented.
VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
ACCEPTANCE OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES:
Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes-May 22,1997:
MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Stigney to accept the Economic Development Council Meeting Minutes of
May 22, 1997 as presented.
VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
CONSENT AGENDA:
Mr.Whiting presented the Consent Agenda as follows: 1111
A. Approve Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds.
B. Adopt Resolution No. 5146 Approving a Step Adjustment for Pamela Sheldon,Community Development
Director.
C. Set a Public Hearing for Monday,August 11, 1997 at 7:05 p.m.to consider the transfer of the off-sale
intoxicating liquor license for Murzyn Liquors,2840 Highway 10 to Chou Vang.
D. Set a Public Haring for 7:10 p.m.,on Monday,August 11, 1997 to Consider Ordinance No.602,An
Ordinance Related to Wetland Zoning Regulations and Amending Title 1000,Chapter 1010,Sections 1010.07,
and 1010.09 of the Mounds View Municipal Code.
E. Set a Public Hearing for 7:15 p.m.on Monday,August 11, 1997 to Consider Resolution No.5145, A
Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Children's Home Society at 5394 Edgewood Drive.
F. LICENSES FOR APPROVAL:
General(Commercial)-Expires June 30. 1998
Fred Lutz Co. -New
Johnson Window Service-New
HVAC-Expires June 30. 1998
Allied Fireside DBA,Fireside Corner,Twin City Fireplace-Renewal
Hinding Heating-Renewal
Classic Air and Appliance-New
SI Marie Sheet Metal,Inc.-Renewal
APPROVED
Page 3
• July 28, 1997
Mounds View City Council
Demolition-Expires June 30. 1998
Drobnick's Coast Clean Up-New
Sewer and Water-Expires June 30. 1998
NOVA Frost,Inc. -New
Sign-Expires June 30. 1998
Arrow Sign and Awning,Inc.-New
Mayor McCarty asked if there were items that any council member wished to have removed from the Consent
Agenda Council member Stigney requested that Item B be removed for discussion.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve the Consent Agenda AS AMENDED(removal of Item
8(B).
VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Council member Stigney stated he acknowledges that Ms. Sheldon is a hard worker and has been a very
dedicated employee,however he has a problem approving a salary increase for someone who is leaving. It
• will cost the city additional funds just to fill the gap between Ms.Sheldon's departure and the hiring of a new
Community Development Director. He always understood that a salary increase was based upon previous
work history and what is projected. Therefore he feels it is inappropriate to approve the increase.
A discussion followed in regard to the criteria in which step adjustments are awarded. Mr.Whiting explained
that the step adjustment is done on an employee's anniversary date,(which for Ms. Sheldon is
July 29)unless past performance indicates differently. Ms. Sheldon's final employment date is August 8,
1997.
MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Quick to approve the Adoption of Resolution No.5146,Approving a Step
Adjustment for Pamela Sheldon,Community Development Director.
VOTE: 4 ayes 1 nay(Stigney) Motion Carried
RESIDENTS REOUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR:
Mayor McCarty explained that this is the time for residents to address the council with concerns on items that
are not on the Agenda
Cameron Obert,8315 Greenwood Drive,asked for a brief update on the airport issues. He noted his recent
experiences with aircraft flying low over the area and conversations he had with people at the airport's traf5p
control tower who told him that the tower has no control over the height the planes come in and go
Mayor McCarty provided a brief update in regard to the plans for improvements to the Anoka/Blaine Airport.
He stated the Council is trying to have an impact before the plan is finalized.
Mr. Obert took this opportunity to express his appreciation for Ms.Sheldon's dedicated service to the City of
Mounds View.
APPROVED
Pa4
July 288,, 1997
•
Mounds View City Council
Bill Fritz,8072 Long Lake Road,stated his concern as to the safety at the 118/35W access point. The cut
which was made from the Highway 610 to the Old County Road J has dumped traffic onto Long Lake Road.
Promises were made by MNDOT that this would be taken out if it created problems. Mr.Fritz stated with the
theater development,additional traffic will be generated on Long Lake Road. He would like to see something
done about this.
Jerry Linke,2319 Knollwood Drive,explained that there is a caveat in the approval process whereby if certain
conditions were met,it could constitute removal of the intersection. He encouraged the Council to check with
the Police Departments for Mounds View,Blaine,and the Highway Department to obtain the number of
accidents that have occurred at the site.
Mr.Linke noted the memo of July 25, 1997 to the City Council in regard to proposed re-alignment of
Edgewood as part of the redevelopment project proposed for the south side of Highway 10. He noted that this
would eliminate the soccer field and wondered if the Park&Recreation Department was aware of this
proposal. He stated the city is already short on soccer field space and this would only add to the problem.
Mayor McCarty explained that this is at a very preliminary stage and that he does not believe the city would
intend to eliminate a field without replacing it. He noted that there is still much research to be done to
determine the feasibility and the city intends to fully involve the public in the process. Again,he noted that the
proposal is in a very preliminary stage.
Mr.Whiting stated that there would never be any decisions made that were not in the best interest of the
community.
David Jahnke,8428 Eastwood Road,asked for an agenda clarification on the presentation by MSP Real Estate
for the development proposal for the Silver Lake Commons area. Mayor McCarty explained that the Council
would be recessing their meeting at approximately 8:00 p.m.to move to the EDA Meeting for the Public
Hearing in regard to this item.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
There were no Public Hearings scheduled for this meeting.
COUNCIL BUSINESS:
Mayor McCarty noted that he would like to have the Council consider Item 11 (C)at this time.
C. Receive the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31,1996.
Jeff Wilson,of Tautges,Redpath presented the Annual Financial Report for the City of Mounds View noting
that this is the first year that the Finance Department has taken 100%responsibility for the report and
acknowledging the excellent job they did in completing it. He proceeded to go through the management letter
with the council. He noted that their recommendations would be to stay on top of the MSA funds and continue
to look at the water and sewer rates,incorporating small increases each year rather than a large increase every
four years.
Mayor McCarty recessed the City Council meeting at 8:15 p.m.to hold the EDA Public Hearing in regard to
•
the sale of land located at 2625 Highway 10 for the purpose of a Redevelopment Project.
r'
Page 5
. July 28, 1997
Mounds View City Council
Mayor McCarty reconvened the City Council meeting at 10:46 p.m.
A. Consideration of Resolution No.5144,A Resolution Approving a Development Review for Silver
Lake Commons,2625-2665 Highway 10.
Ms.Sheldon explained that this resolution contains contingencies and states that it would become null and void
if there is not a sale or transfer of the property within one year from the time the Resolution was passed.
MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Koopmeiners to approve Resolution No.5144,A Resolution Approving a
Development Review for Silver Lake Commons,2625-2665 Highway 10.
Council member Trude noted that many residents in apartments use the garage space for storage and she
wondered if the city should consider requiring additional parking spaces per unit for the development Ms.
Sheldon noted that there is a contingency whereby if the city notifies the developer in writing of the need for
additional parking,the developer would need to provide it within three months(with a consideration for
weather). The Planning Commission indicated their desire to see how the project worked with the agreed upon
ratio.
VOTE: 3 ayes 2 nays(Trude/Stigney) Motion Carried
B. Consider Employment Agreement with the golf course superintendent for the operation of the golf
course.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve the Employment Agreement with the golf course
superintendent for the operation of the golf course.
MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Trude to table the consideration of the Employment Agreement with the golf
course superintendent for the operation of the golf course to allow time to further discuss this at the upcoming
work session.
VOTE: 3 ayes 2 nays(Koopmeiners/Quick) Motion Carried
Report of Council members:
Trude: No report
Stigney: Council member Stigney asked that the Highway 118 trouble spot be added to the Work Session
agenda for discussion,as he also acknowledges that a problem exists in this area.
Quick: No report
Koopmeiners: No report.
Report of Mayor McCarty: Mayor McCarty stated he would like to pursue whether or not other cities have
been successful with the"No Tolerance Speed Enforcement Policy".
• Report of Clerk Administrator: Mr.Whiting noted that the Airport meeting scheduled for Tuesday,July
29th had been canceled. The quarterly staff reports will be available at the Council Work Session.
APPROVED
Page 6
July 28, 1997 •
Mounds View City Council
Report of Staff: No report
Report of Attorney: No report.
Mayor McCarty recessed the July 28, 1997 Council Meeting to an Executive Session at 11:00 p.m.to discuss
Council Business,Item 11 (D) Review of golf course mediation(legal issues).
The Council Meeting was reconvened at 11:40 p.m.,then adjourned at 11:41 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
C. )ai /7
Tamara D. Saeflce
Recording Secretary
•
• PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Special Meeting
June 18, 1997
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Acting Chair Stevenson at 7:10 p.m.
2. Roll Call
Members present: Commissioners Brooks, Obert, Miller, and Stevenson. (Chair
Peterson and Commissioner Brasaemle and Johnston had excused absences).
Also Present: Community Development Director Sheldon, Planning Associate
Ericson, Recording Secretary Benesch and Council Liaison Koopmeiners.
1111
3. Citizen Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda
There were no citizens requests or comments from the floor.
Index to Minutes Page
Planning Case No. 488-97, Variance in Front Setback to Allow
Business Identification Sign for Spot's Quick Lube, 2975 Highway 10 2
Bonnie Reiter, 2728 Woodcrest Drive, was in the audience. She has made application
to the City for a conditional use permit to allow operation of a cat kennel on her property.
Ms. Reiter had the understanding that her case would be discussed at this meeting. Staff
informed Ms. Reiter that her case would be discussed at the July 16, 1997, Planning
Commission meeting.
•
Mounds View Planning Commission June 18, 1997
Regular Meeting Page 2 •
4.
Planning Case No. 488-97
2975 Highway 10
Applicant: Spot's Quick Lube
Variance in Front Setback to Allow Business Identification Sign for Spots Quick Lube
The applicant, Ron Ostrander, was not present.
Community Development Director Sheldon reviewed the request informing the
Commission that the applicant is requesting a variance in the front setback to
place their business identification sign within 5 feet of the front property line along
Highway 10 where 15 feet is required by City Code. Director Sheldon indicated that
the identification sign for the previous business was also closer than the 15 feet.
The applicant is proposing to move it closer to Highway 10 because of visibility
problems due to large trees being located on the properties to the north and south
of Mr. Ostrander's property. Director Sheldon also informed the Commission that
the support pad for the pedestal sign has already been poured because the •
applicant had noticed the problem caused by the trees and had moved the sign
without realizing that a variance was needed.
Director Sheldon informed the Commission that Staff feels the variance for this sign
is justified.
Commissioner Stevenson commented that he had looked at the situation in the
field and agreed that there was a problem with seeing the sign because of the
trees. Commissioner Miller had also viewed the situation and felt the trees would
obstruct the view of the sign from the highway unless it was moved further forward.
Commissioner Obert commented that Mr. Ostrander has done an good job
developing the property. He indicated that he does not a have a problem with the
location of the sign because he feels this is a special situation due to the large
trees located on the property. However, he thinks the Commission needs to be
careful regarding the granting of variances along Highway 10 since the City
receive future variance requests because of the Highway 10 redevelopment
he does not want to see business signs strewn along the highway.
Motion/Second: Miller/Obert to approve Resolution No. 511-97, "Resolution Approving a
Reduction in the Minimum Setback for a Pylon Sign from 15 Feet to 5 Feet for Spot's •
Quick Lube, Inc. at 2975 Highway 10; Planning Case No. 488-97".
Mounds View Planning Commission June 18, 1997
Regular Meeting Page 3
Motion Carried: 4 ayes, 0 nays
5. Staff Report/Information Items
a. Community Development Director Sheldon updated the Planning
Commission on the proposed Ring Road project. She also discussed the
proposed signalization and realignment of Edgewood Drive and Highway 10.
6. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports
Members present at the June 4, 1997, included Commissioners Brooks, Obert,
Miller, Brasaemle, Stevenson and Johnston. (Chair Peterson had an excused
absence).
Also present were Community Development Director Sheldon, Planning Associate
Ericson and Council Liaison Koopmeiners.
• 7. Adjournment
There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Acting Chair •
Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 7:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
DuLtbati----. •
Pamela Sheldon
Community Development Director
•
1
• PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
June 4, 1997
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Acting Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m.
2. Roll Call
Members present: Commissioners Brooks, Obert, Miller, Brasaemle, Stevenson
and Johnston. (Chair Peterson had an excused absence).
Also Present: Community Development Director Sheldon, Planning Associate
Ericson and Council Liaison Koopmeiners.
•
3. Approval of Minutes: April 2, 1997 (Regular Meeting)
April 2, 1997 (Special Agenda Meeting)
April 16, 1997 (Special Meeting)
Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Brooks to approve the minutes listed above as amended at
the previous agenda meeting.
Motion Carried: 6 ayes, 0 nays
4. Citizen Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda
There were no citizen requests or comments from the floor.
Index to Minutes Page
Planning Case No. 485-97, Variance to Allow a 34 Foot Lot Width for
Glenn Kaden, 7720/7730 Silver Lake Road 2
111
Mounds View Planning Commission June 4, 1997 •
Regular Meeting Page 2
5.
Planning Case No. 485-97
7720/7730 Silver Lake Road
Applicant: Glenn Karlen
Request for a Variance to Allow a 34 Foot Lot Width, Where 50 Feet is Required
The applicant, Glenn Kaden, was present.
Planning Associate Ericson briefly reviewed the request informing the Commission
that the applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the minimum lot width from 50
feet to 34 feet for proposed Parcel B for an existing twin home located at
7720/7730 Silver Lake Road. He informed the Commission that the twin home was
constructed in 1978 which was prior to the current regulation governing twin homes
and zero lot line developments. He added that the applicant, Mr. Kaden, would like
to convert the building to owner-occupied units and feels that a zero lot line
subdivision would advance this process. Mr. Ericson added that the twin home is •
located off-center on the lot so that the two lots created by the subdivision would
not be of equal size; one would meet the minimum lot width and the other would be
34 feet wide. The lots do meet the minimum size for area. He added that the
granting of this variance would not result in any visible physical change in
appearance of the twin home.
Motion/Second: Miller/Brasaemle to approve Resolution No. 510-97, "Resolution
Approving a Reduction in the Minimum Lot Width Requirement From 50 Feet to 34 Feet to
Allow for a Zero Lot Line Subdivision for 7730 Silver Lake Road; Planning Case No.
485-97".
Motion Carried: 6 ayes, 0 nay
5. Staff Report/lnformation Items
a. Community Development Director Sheldon informed the Commission that
she attended a class given by the American Planning Association's
Minnesota Chapter and the Met Council on Comprehensive Plans and new
legislation that has recently been passed. She indicated that they reviewed
the regional growth forecast and regional development blue print and that
Met Council has four system-wide plans they put together water supply, •
sewage treatment, airports, and transportation. She added that the new
• Mounds View Planning Commission June 4, 1997
Regular Meeting Page 3
legislation has changed the precedence given to zoning over Comp Plans
and has reversed it. She informed the Planning Commission that she would
read the materials and update them at their next meeting.
b. She mentioned to the Planning Commission that Staff went to Council
Monday evening requesting summer help for code enforcement, minor plan
review, and building inspections and the Council agreed to hire someone.
She also informed them that she is also planning to request to hire a
recording secretary for the Planning Commission meetings to assist the
Department Secretary because of work load. There is also a possibility of
hiring some temporary secretarial help.
6. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports
Acting Chair Stevenson reported that members present at the May 21, 1997,
meeting included Commissioners Brooks, Johnston, Obert, Miller, Brasaemle,
Stevenson and Chair Peterson.
Also present were Community Development Director Sheldon, Planning Associate
Ericson and Council Liaison Koopmeiners.
Commissioner Miller asked Council Liaison Koopmeiners if the Council is
comfortable with the amount of development on the D.W. Jones property. Mr.
Koopmeiners commented that he has some concerns with how much is planned for
the property but that he could not speak for the rest of the City Council. The
Planning Commission briefly discussed the D. W. Jones proposal.
Director Sheldon informed the Commission that Staff met with Wendell Smith,
representing the O'Neil property along with Commissioner Stevenson, Mayor
McCarty, Councilmember Koopmeiners and Glen Van Wormer, Traffic Engineer for
SEH. She briefly reviewed what was discussed at this meeting with the ring road
being the main topic of the meeting.
Commissioner Johnston inquired as to how the ring road will effect the public
hearing process since the public has not seen this concept. Director Sheldon
indicated that the ring road will be on the development plan. She added, however,
that the developer has designed the plan so that the buildings did not move. The
• Planning Commission briefly discussed the ring road.
Mounds View Planning Commission June 4, 1997
Regular Meeting Page 4
•
Commissioner Johnston informed the Commission that he will not be in
attendance at the next Planning Commission meeting.
7. Adjournment
There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Acting Chair
Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 7:28 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
1LL ,
Pamela Sheldon
Community Development Director
S
•
• PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Special Meeting
May 21, 1997
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Chair Peterson at 7:05 p.m.
2. Roll Call
Members present: Commissioners Brooks, Obert, Miller, Brasaemle, Stevenson
Johnston and Chair Peterson.
Also Present: Community Development Director Sheldon, Planning Associate
Ericson and Council Liaison Koopmeiners.
3. Citizen Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda
There were no citizens requests or comments from the floor.
Index to Minutes Page
Planning Case No. 480-97, Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Garage, 2
Kenneth Newcombe, 7150 Knollwood Drive
Planning Case No. 481-97, Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Garage, 4
Noel Barragan, 7765 Spring Lake Road
Planning Case No. 483-97, Conditional Use Permit for Outdoor Sales of 5
Produce, Merryville Farm Market, Mounds View Square
Planning Case No. 484-97, Variance for Front Yard Setback, Twin Cities 6
Habitat for Humanity, 5377 Quincy Street
•
Mounds View Planning Commission May 21, 1997 •
Regular Meeting Page 2
4.
Planning Case No. 480-97
7150 Knollwood Drive
Applicant: Kenneth Newcombe
Request for a Conditional Use Permit for an oversized garage (1,264 square feet).
The applicant, Kenneth Newcombe, was present.
Planning Associate Ericson briefly reviewed the request informing the Commission
that the applicant is requesting to construct a 1,264 square foot garage on his
property located at 7150 Knollwood Drive and that the dimensions of the garage
will be 39.5 feet by 32 feet which is four percent of the rear yard. He informed the
Commission that there was an attached single car garage which was converted to
living space in 1994. He informed the Commission that there are two driveways
currently on the property; one leading to the old location of the garage and one
leading to the proposed garage.
1111
Mr. Ericson explained that while out at the property he noticed nuisance code
violations in the rear yard (pop cans, brush, buckets, etc.) which can be seen from
Woodale Drive. Mr. Ericson recommended that these items be removed prior to
City Council approval of the conditional use permit.
Mr. Ericson stated that all dimensional requirements have been met and he noted
that the lot size is 506' by 100'.
He added that Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 506-97
recommending to the City Council approval of the conditional use permit allowing
the 1,264 square foot garage with stipulations. Mr. Ericson read aloud the
stipulations contained in the resolution.
The applicant, Kenneth Newcombe, addressed the Planning Commission
explaining that the cans and buckets will be moved to the proposed garage. He
added that he will dispose of most of the brush but would keep some of it for
recreational fires. Chair Peterson indicated that storage of wood is not prohibited
as long as it is kept in an orderly manner. Commissioner Brooks inquired as to
when they were planning to build the garage. The applicant responded that as
soon as he receives approval he will begin construction. Commissioner Miller
inquired about the old driveway. The applicant indicated that he would be willing to •
remove a portion of the driveway leading to the street and plant grass in that
Mounds View Planning Commission May 21, 1997
Regular Meeting Page 3
section. He indicated that he wants to leave a portion of the old driveway for his
basketball hoop. Chair Peterson asked if the new driveway would be paved. The
applicant indicated that eventually it would be, depending upon the funds available.
Commissioner Brasaemle inquired about the number of entrances in the front of
the garage. Planning Associate Ericson indicated that he believes this requirement
applies only to the front of the garage, not the rear.
Commissioner Miller inquired as to the requirement for improved surfaces when
building a new garage. Mr. Ericson commented that our Code states that parking
surfaces (i.e., driveways) must be improved. Community Director Sheldon added
that the minimum allowed would be gravel. Mr. Newcombe again stated that the
driveway would be done with concrete next year when the funds are available.
Motion/Second: Stevenson/Brasaemle to approve Resolution No. 506-97, "Resolution
Recommending Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to Allow an Oversized Garage for
• Kenneth Newcombe, 7150 Knollwood Drive, Mounds View Planning Case No. 480-97", as
amended.
Jerry Blanski, 2933 Woodale Drive, addressed the Planning Commission stating
that he borders Mr. Newcombe's property and that he has no objection to the size
of the proposed garage but is concerned with the time period in which he has to
complete the garage. Mr. Ericson indicated that there is a stipulation with approval
of the conditional use permit that the applicant would have one year to complete
the garage and if it is not completed within that time the applicant must remove the
garage or apply for a new conditional use permit. Mr. Blanski also inquired about
the width of the lot and where the garage would be located and wondered how
close he would be to the property lines. Mr. Ericson indicated that the garage
would be 60 feet away from the neighboring properties to the south.
Commissioner Miller indicated that the Code does allow five feet from the
property line. Mr. Blanski was concerned with the applicant having to remove
another tree to build the garage. Mr. Blanski asked that the stipulations again be
stated.
Commissioner Miller inquired about the statement contained in the resolution tha
refers to "storage of larger than typical equipment° being allowed. Planning
Associate Ericson responded by saying that he believes this statement refers to
• riding lawn mowers as opposed to a push mower, but that the statement could be
changed to be more specific.
Mounds View Planning Commission May 21, 1997
1111
Regular Meeting Page 4
Commissioner Brasaemle questioned the height of the proposed garage and
questioned the maximum height requirement of 15 feet. Director Sheldon
explained that the 15 feet maximum is measured to a point halfway up the peak,
based on the definition for building height.
Motion Carried: 7 ayes, 0 nays
The Planning Commission continued to discuss the amendments to the stipulations
contained in the resolution.
The applicant was informed that the City Council would be considering this case on
June 9, 1997, at which time a public hearing would be held.
5.
Planning Case No. 481-97
7765 Spring Lake Road
Applicant: Noel Barragan11110 '
Request for a Conditional Use Permit for an oversized garage (1,180 square feet).
The applicants, C. R. and Noel Barragan, were present.
Planning Associate Ericson explained that the applicant is requesting a conditional
use permit to construct an oversized garage (1,180 square feet) located at 7765
Spring Lake Road. He added that the dimensions of the garage will be 36 feet by
32 feet and would take 7.1 percent of the area of the lot (not including the property
that extends across the street and under a portion of Spring Lake).
The Planning Commission was concerned with the two curb cuts on the property.
The applicant responded that the double curb cut is aesthetically pleasing and
would rather not remove one of them. Director Sheldon added that perhaps this
issue could be worked out when Spring Lake Road is reconstructed in 1998, The
Code allows for homeowners to apply for a variance to keep two driveways and a
possible justification in this case could be a site distance problem beep,
property is on a curve.
The Planning Commission discussed the amendments to the stipulations contained
in the resolution.
•
•
Mounds View Planning Commission May 21, 1997
Regular Meeting Page 5
Motion/Second:. Brasaemle/Brooks to approve Resolution No. 507-97, "Resolution
Recommending Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to Allow an Oversized.Garage for
Noel Ban-agan, 7765 Spring Lake Road, Mounds View Planning Case No. 481-97".
Motion Carried: 7 ayes, 0 nays
The applicant was informed that this case would be considered at the June 9,
1997, City Council meeting, at which time a public hearing would be held.
The Planning Commission discussed the issue.of revising the Code since at this
time each year several applications for oversized garage are brought before the
City for action.
6.
Planning Case No. 483-97
Mounds View Square Shopping Center
Applicant: Merryville Farm Market
Request for a Conditional Use Permit for Outdoor Sales of Produce
Kirk Olson, representing Merryville Farm Market, was present.
Planning Associate Ericson reviewed this case explaining that the applicant is
requesting a conditional use permit for outdoor sales of produce at Mounds View
Square Shopping Center parking lot from July 1 to September 21, 1997, seven
days a week from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Mr. Ericson reminded the Commission
that the applicant was granted a conditional use permit last year at the same
location and that Staff is not aware of any problems as a result of this operation.
He added that no changes have been proposed from last year, however, there may
be a slight overlap in the uses at Mounds View Square Shopping Center parking lot
since Linders Greenhouses' conditional use permit expires on July 15, 1997. Mr.
Ericson added that the stipulations and criteria for granting a conditional use permit
have been met regarding this request.
Mr. Ericson stated that Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 508-97.
Motion/Second: Miller/Obert to approve Resolution No. 508-97, "Resolution
Recommending to City Council Approval of the Conditional Use Permit Request by
Merryville Farm Market, Mounds View Square; Planning Case No. 483-97".
Mounds View Planning Commission May 21, 1997
Regular Meeting Page 6
Motion Carried: 7 ayes, 0 nays
The applicant was informed that this item would be considered at the June 9, 1997,
. City Council meeting, at which time a public hearing would be held.
7.
Planning Case No. 484-97
5377 Quincy Street
Applicant: Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity
Request for a Variance to Allow a Four Foot Encroachment into the 30-Foot Setback
Bill Powell, representing Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity, was present. •
Planning Associate Ericson explained that the applicant is requesting a variance to
the front yard setback to construct a six foot covered entryway to the house that is
currently under construction at 5377 Quincy Street. He added that the property,
which was created in 1989 as a result of a minor subdivision at 2186 Bronson
Drive, conforms to the dimensional requirements for buildable lots. However, it is
irregularly shaped because it is more wide than it is deep which limits where the
house can be located on the property. Mr. Ericson added that the house cannot be
moved back any further because of the rear setback requirement. He also added
that 4 of the 6 houses located on the west side of Quincy street encroach into the
front setback; two at 25 feet and two at 15 feet. The applicant is requesting a 24
foot setback. Mr. Ericson added that Staff feels the proposal meets the criteria for
granting a vairance.
Bill Powell, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity, addressed the Planning
Commission explaining that the entryway would be an open porch with a wood
railing around three sides. He added that the entryway is proposed to be a truss-
supported roof structure on concrete footings with a wood deck.
Planning Associate Ericson indicated that Staff is recommending apa
amended Resolution No. 509-97. Staff was also recommending changes to the
resolution to change all references to a 26 foot setback be changed to 24 feet and
that all references to a 4 foot encroachment be changed to 6 feet.
Mounds View Planning Commission May 21, 1997
Regular Meeting Page 7
Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Miller to approve Resolution No. 509-97, "Resolution
Approving a Reduction in the Front Setback Requirement from 30 Feet to 26 Feet for
Construction of a Covered Entryway at 5377 Quincy Street; Planning Case No. 484-97",
as amended.
Commissioner Brasaemle commented that he did not see this request as being a
major problem in light of other setbacks along Quincy Street and the fact that the
lot is shallow. Chair Peterson added that he was not familiar with the situation
when the lot was platted in 1989, but that additional property may have been taken
with the reconstruction and widening of Quincy Street.
Motion Carried: 7 ayes, 0 nays
Chair Peterson informed the applicant that this item does not require City Council
action and that final approval has been granted.
8. Staff Report/Information Items
There were no Staff Reports or Information Items.
9. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports
Members present at the May 7, 1997, meeting were Commissioners Brooks, Obert,
Miller, Brasaemle, and Chair Peterson. (Commissioners Stevenson and Johnston
had excused absences).
Also present were Community Development Director Sheldon, Planning Associate
Ericson and Council Liaison Koopmeiners. .
10. Adjournment
There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Peterson
adjourned the meeting at 8:58 p.m.
(The agenda meeting immediately followed the special meeting).
Respectfully submitted,
Pamela Sheldon
Community Development Director
II
• CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT
CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and;
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the claim numbers:
56554 through 56683 in the amount of$ 489,166.81
55466 through 55478 in the amount of$ 125,686.05
through in the amount of$
• through in the amount of$
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 614,852.86
and has found said claims to be just and correct;
It was moved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached
list of claims dated 08/26/97 by the vote ayes nayes
Mayor
Clerk-Administrator
•
AGE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK: REGISTER
P-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW
ENDOR CHECK: CHECK _ INVOICE INVOICE L
NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE 'NMBR DATE AMOUNT
2.1 /S.C. I .A. 56554 08/26/97
8 ,. u
/2��/s 7 t7_ /tj,I/Q7 120.E0
VENDOR TOTAL 120.00
9210 PEARSON, ROBERT /.
._��_�_i._ tjr,/'�(-, �7 24589 - 0R/09/97 7 1ti<).tjtj
VENDOR TOTAL 180.00
0050 OSTRANDER, RON 54 08/26/97 08/24/97 24".,.50
VENDOR TOTAL 25.5(.?
6::305 HARRER, JENNIFER 56557 08/24/9/7 55238 07/02/97 47.58
VENDOR TOTAL 67.5=
3100 ALLRED, JAMES 56558 08/26/Q7 OS/12/97 17.00
,
VENDOR TOTAL 17.00
3200 EIMER, RICHARD 556559 08/26/97 08/05/::+7 40.00 .
VENDOR ..TOTAL 40.00
E201 FELGATE, JUDY 56560 08/26/';+7 08/05/97 05
VENDOR TOTAL 40.00
i'202 FULLER, CATHY 54561 08/26/97 0 ,/05/97 40.00
VENDOR TOTAL 40.00
'~ 9'I L VER LKWOODS HMOWNit �!5 l: 08/26/97 9368
_ 0R/11/97 15R.t-
410
VENDOR TOTAL 158.65
)204 SHAMP, : DONNA 56563 08/26/'7. __- 08/13/97 2R.00
VENDOR TOTAL 28.00
:2.05 HARDENBURGH, GARY 56564 08/266/97 08/18/97 = 10.00 1
VENDOR TOTAL 10.00
206 BEVERLY BUILDERS 54565 08/26/97 08,/ .�7/'=+7 90.00
VENDOR TOTAL 90.00
207 JAMES AMES 56566 00/26/97 08/26/97 30.00
VENDOR TOTAL 30.00
202 HELEN CHAMBERS 56567 08/26/-+7 05/26/97 40.00
VENDOR TOTAL 40.00
005 A-i HYDRAULIC SALES &-1( 56568 0}_i/26/97 :7:4092 08/01/97 15. 16
VENDOR TOTAL 15. 16 1
7x,0 A I RTOUCH CELLULAR, 5c9 08/2A/'-'7 3.99 s.
54569 08/24/97 07/20/97 34.43
56569 08/26/97
�: : i�.tj:}:I�7555{) . 08/26/97 20.4=;
VENDOR TOTAL 40.85
•
" r
1
PAGE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-C10-Of MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE
NO VENDOR NAME . • NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT
A4.ALPHA VIDEO AND AUDIO 56570 00/26/97 164448-00 07/28/97 1724.65
VENDOR TOTAL 1724.65
A517O AMERICAN RED .CROSS 56571 1 07 =f
_ J tJ,�/.=1../`:+7 . 14.05
VENDOR TOTAL 16.05
A5260 ANCHOR PAPER CO. 56572 08/26/97 102780101 0;_8/01/97 482.55
54572 08/26/97 .10300771)1 OR/24/97 402.90
VENDOR TOTAL 885.45
A8350
AUGIE'S, INC. 5!_-,573 08/26/97 19272 08/15/97 50.58
54570 08/26/97 1884031 08/01/97 44.70
54573 08/26/97 18087 07/25/97 60.84
VENDOR TOTAL 156. 12
B0570 BARTON SAND AND GRAVE* 54574 08/26/97/24/;'+7 BAQ5:394 08/26/97 410.0:
.._ VENDOR TOTAL_ 410.06
80661 BATTERIES PLUS 54575 0R/26/97 D24694 O:: 2A/97 43.52
VENDOR TOTAL 42.52
82000 RIFFS, INC 56576 08/26/97 8I1O2214 07/31/97 100.52
54576 00/24/97/97 B 1102215 07/31/97 100.52
54576
08/26- /97 BI1o2214 07/81/97 110.26
5576 08/26/97 8I1O2217 07/31/97 50.26� Sl2 /`ir. 7 8I102218 07/81/97 �, {
56576 O8/26/97
- 81102219 . 07/31/97 . 50.26 ..
5657 • V:./24/i7 FI i 32 2a
3 07/31/97 50.26�
54576 08/26/97 81102221 07/:31/97 50.26
54576 08/26/97: ESI 102222 07/31/97 r.+7 44.26
56574 08/26/97/97_.81102223 07/31/97 130.26
56576 08/26/97. 81102224 07/31/97 5O.26
54574 08/24/97 81102225 07/31/97 130.26
J
VENDOR TOTAL 9_;7.+4?•
Er-'00F= BE. c�-... ENEP� 5 cf657_ 00/26/97 326664
07/01/97 1.-,...59
56578 08/26/97 327808 07/02/97 25.41
56578 08/24/97 3:32271 07/09/97 6. 19
54578
-578 08/2_/97 332978 07/10/.7 79.26
54570 08/26/97 333931 07/11/97 5.
56578 06/26/97 833936 07/11 /97 12.74
5t-•578 0:_:/ 6/97 333257=257 07/17/97 11 .43
56573 08/24/97 341836 07/23/97 29. 10
56578 08/26/97 :343578 07/25/97 44. 18
54578 08/24/97 :3451341- _ 07/29/97 8.47
56573 08/24/97 354614 08/14/97 2- 7
56578 08/26/97 355587 01 %7
l 1 !`: 40. 37
54573 03/24,/97 403351 08/13/97 .72.p.-
56578
72. _-
56578 08/26/97 35491.7 08/26/97 6.72
. 54578 01:::/2,4,./97 -15_55142 0:_:/24,/97 11 .70.
•
iGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER I
.-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW
NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE U.
NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT
56578 08/26/97 354228 08/26/97 2.58
41Io
54578 08/26/97 3387'31 08/26/97 17.86
56578 08/26/97 357407 08/26/97 8.39
56578 08/26/97357469 08/26/97 . 9.5.5
56578 08/26/97 355649 03/26/97 32.34
VENDOR TOTAL 425.76
f_
C50 BEST BUY CO. , INC. 56:531 08/26/97 0437588 08/26/97 9.05
.56581 08/26/97 0110125252 08/26/97 85. 19 I
VENDOR TOTAL 94.24 i
!
010 BROADWAY RENTAL EQUIP* 56582 08/26/97 229529 O8/05/97 2274.90 I
VENDOR TOTAL 223.90 t
100 BRYAN. ROCK PRODUCTS, * 54583 .08/26/97. 7055A 07/31/97 479.01 I
56583 08/26/97 7055 08/26/97 953.25
VENDOR TOTAL 143 .26
I
180 BUMPER TO BUMPER 56584 08/26/97 0232000 08/26/97 50.94
56584 08/26/97 02:3657:3 08/24/97 1 1::. 10 i
56584 08/26/97 0234212 08/26/97 21 .29 t
56584 08/26/97 0239465 08/26/97 34.44
56584 08/26/97 0237051 08/26/97 21479
56584 08/26/97 0239169 08/26/97 118.02
VENDOR TOTAL 259.58
20L4111 FFEE-INN OF MINNESD* 56585 08/26/97 4:3511 07/25/ 77.9577. 5
VENDOR
TOTAL ' 77.95
E23 COMMONWEALTH LAND TIT* 56586 08/26/97 08/26/97 125.00
56586 08/26/97 4580 08/26/97 2793.00
56586 08/26/97. 4579 08/26/97 27322.90
56586 08/26/97 9915 08/26/97 15801 .86
56586 08/26/97 08/26/97 223252.20 I
VENDOR TOTAL 269294.96 I
45 COMPUTOSERVICE, INC. 56587 08/26/97 07/31/97 54.00
VENDOR TOTAL 54.00 I
;
00 CONCEPT ENVIRONMENTAL* 56583 08/26/97 700012 08/07/97 398.50
VENDOR TOTAL 398.50 t
4
1
25 COTTENS INC 56589 08/26/97 227439 08/14/97 40.09
56589 08/26/97 227599 08/26/97 17.64
56589 08/26/97 2:7767 08/26/97 6.92 I
5609 08/26/97 -.13343 08/24/97
VENDOR TOTAL 150.61 i
„
i
,
CO CROSS NURSERIES, INC 56590 08/26/97 497 05/05/97 110. :3 t
VENDOR TOTAL 110. -"d f
illo /
,
AGE 4ACCOUNTS PAYABLECHECK REGISTER
.
P-C10-01 ,� ' � / �� ' �� � '�~ MOUNDS VIEW
ENDOR
CHECK '^ CHECK � � � INVOICE INVOICE t
NO VENDOR NAME ` NUMBER ' DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNTIlk
'
81 MOTORCOMPANY*
56591 08/26/97 090609 08/26/97 77.20
VENDOR TOTAL 77.20
.-r
0050 DCA, INC. 56592 08/26/97 95094 07/31/97 158. 10
VENDOR TOTAL 158~ 10
}095 D-ROCK CENTER & SMALL* 56593 08/26/97 10721 08y26/97 58.52
VENDOR TOTAL 58.52
V.350 DISH NETWORK 56594 08/26/97 07/27/97 5.34
VENDOR TOTAL 5.34
3550DROBNICK'S DEMO 56595 08/26/97 � ��� 08/26/97 7875.00
VENDOR TOTAL 7875.00
)31�� EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
v,�RAGE' ' '~-~- ----- - '--- ^ -' ''-� -----' ~'
' ----5b576 08/26/97-181826 ��--- �-07/29y97 - - 38().30
56596 08y26y97 184746 08/05/97 294.30
56596 08y26y97 189554 08/15/97 181 .50
VENDOR TOTAL ` 856. 10 '
i925 FEDORS MARKET 56597 08/26/97 18291 ' 07/12/97 38.40
' . 56597 08y26/97- 110897ST 08/08/97 51 .92
VENDOR TOTAL 90.32
11Ik` IENDLyCHEVROLET GE* � �.56598 �C8267115344 ������ ) 6 97 40.19�^�' ,5659808/26/97115317��� ' �~`��08/26/97 107.29 ' '
VENDOR TOTAL 147.48 ,
:.950
- `--FUEL OIL�'-SERVICE CO. ,* - 56599 08 / 7 221 30 --�' 08/13/97 -- 91
5 6/9722129� `x .���/".08/13/97 485.35 ,
56599 08/26y97 11276 ' - �� ()8/26/97 , ,` 12.46
- - `56599 08y26/97 11275 ^ 08�26y97 �276.36
1
56599 08/26/97 11290 08y26/97 82.54
VENDOR TOTAL 1117.62
100 FURST GROUP, INC 56600 08/26/97 ' 07/22/97 2.16
VENDOR TOTAL 2. 14
545 GALLAGHERS SERVICE IN* 56601 08y26/97 07/31/97 129.41 '
VENDOR TOTAL
129.41
690 GOLF CAR MIDWEST 56602 OR/26/cg 9719 08/05/97 25.88
56602 08/26y97 971991 08/05/9750 38
^
VENDOR TOTAL 76.26 ^ �
. ' I
693 GOLF DIGEST 56603 08/26/97 07y29y97 19.77
VENDOR TOTAL 19.77
I
935 GOODHUE COUNTY NATION* 56604 08y26/97 49265 07/27y97 24 .84
4111
1
. �
|
!
|
I.GE.: . 5 .. . � ` ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
,-C10-01 � � � MOUNDS VIEW � ' �' ' �
ENDOR �
CHECK CHECK ` ' � INVOICE INVOICE \
NO VENDOR NAME ` NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE . AMOUNT
410 VENDOR. TOTAL . 244.84
5880 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL* 56605 08/26/97 7070447 08y26/97 150.50 '
�� . �� / VENDOR TOTAL 150.50 .
�940 GRIGGS, COOPER, & COM* 56606 08/26/97 90064 07/28/97/97 2 | .78
VENDOR TOTAL 244.78 :
::500 GUTHRIE COSTUME RENTA* 56607 08/26/97 3937 08/08y97 454.25
VENDOR TOTAL 456.25
)473 HALLBERG MARINE, INC 56608 08/26/97 50966 07/24/97 25.00
VENDOR TOTAL ' - 25.00
)800 THANE HAWKINS. POLAR C* _'`56609 08/26/97 CVCS16330008/26/97 -- '237.73 ---i
- � - . � � ' � � ' � ~~ - ~ �� . .� � . � ' � -_ ,- �VENDOR TOTAL� � .� ' -�. 2:37.73 `_.-
_ _ - � -___� _ ' _ _ _---
-994 HOIGAARD'S CUSTOM CAN* 56610 08/26/97 9428 06/18/97 1414.00
VENDOR TOTAL 1414.00
- -
. ^
/825 HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL* � ' � 54411 08/26/97 131540 07y16/97 ' 242.82.
VENDOR TOTAL 242.82 '
I
847 HORNUNG'S PRO GOLF SA* 56612 08/26/97 932555 07/24/97 468.42
41w~- ' _ __ _ _ _ 56612 08/26/97934494 � 07/30/97 562. 14 �_
�
56412 08/26/97 '934111 07/30/97 321 .47 ���-�
- ~ `
` VENDOR TOTAL~` ' `��` 1352.03
848 E. J. HOULE INC ` � � 56613 08/26/97 21087 07/11/97 ' 80.00
' `
_` - '-��- �' ��� ''.'��� _-'''- �' .'�� �� �'��� - � �' ' VENDOR TOTAL ����'�� 80.00
000 HYDRAULIC SPECIALTY C* 56614 08/26/97 20585 ��� ` '-�''08/26y97 59.02
VENDOR TOTAL 59.02
105 IMAGE DESIGN 56615 08/26y97 51509 07/16/97 932.30
VENDOR TOTAL 932.30
535 INSTY-PRINTS 54414 08/26/97 13370 07/25/97 56.63
56616 08/26/97 13550 08/26/97 8.09
VENDOR TOTAL 64.72 �
470 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDI* 54617 08/26y97 130474 04/17/97 112.88
VENDOR TOTAL 112.88
930 LESCO INC. , 54618 08y26y97 REBA9 ' 07/22/97 178.17
56618 08/26/97 9REAR2 07/01/97 2669.96
54418 08/26/97 9XHC63 06/04/97 147.93
VENDOR TOTAL 2996.06
�
t
5 UCENT TECHNOLOGIES 56619 08/26/97 5243873396 08/02y97 50.48
111, i
i
.
PAGE t_ ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE
NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT
1111 VENDOR TOTAL 50.48
M020 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO 56620 08/26/97 1177465 08/05/97 142. 12
56620 08/26/97 C88S97 97 06/ 3/97 _ 28.2'7°-
56620 08/26/97 1160494 : 06/02/97 11 .01
56620 08/26/97 1160682 06/22/97 21 . 3A
56620 08/26/97 I179421 08/26/97 52. 10
56620 08/26/97. 0197220 08/26/97 43.42
VENDOR TOTAL . 242.60
M0676 MARK.ERTEK VIDEO SUPP L • 54621 08/26/97 235645 07/1 /97 772.09
VENDOR TOTAL 772.09
M0760 MATCO TOOLS 54622 08/26/97 58655 08/24/97 S.!3
_ VENDOR _TOTAL __ . _..:._ cam.,_-..;
M2075 MENARDS 5662? 08/26/97
`/'x7 X712,1 07/21/97
7t .x
5662308/26/979,
' 27471 0.aj1 f/; 7 104.57
VENDOR TOTAL 214. 34
M2170 METRO. COUNCIL ENVIRO* 56624 03/26/97 51:320997 08/04/97 60132.00
VENDOR TOTAL A0132.00
M3,122 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 56625 08/26/97 =8043 08/07/97 449.26
56625 08/26/97 38276 08/12/97 36.03
: 56625 08/26/973682008/26/97t 30.01
_
VENDOR TOTAL 515.30
M3442 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPO* . 5/626 .08/26/97 26577MB 06/26/97 5859.01
50+626 08/26/97 _26422MB 08/26/97 1530. 39
VENDOR. TOTAL 7389.40
M3443 MIDWEST FENCE & MFG C* 9 �
5!.t_-�27 �+ /'�j_/'r 7 s-_;i_f7'=+ 0A/23/97 _ 503.75
VENDOR TOTAL 503.75
M2444 MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTIt• 516.28 00/26/97 00210703 00/01/97 14.91
56628 08/26/97 104931 08 07/24/97 470. -9
54628 08/26/97 10557998 07/31/97 707.60
56628 08/26/97 10621453 08/07/97 708. 4
56628 08/26/97 10246873A 07/17/97 5.70-
5 4428 08/26/97 10.3 1312A 07/17/97 50.00
5668 0 1/24/97 107 -4761 08j'20/97 115.70
VENDOR TOTAL 2261 . 14
13448 MIDWEST SPECIALTY SAL* 54429 0R/26/97 8463 08/26/97 89.78
56629 08/26/97 7 _,5i 9 08/26/97
i9
56629 0R/24/97 94// 05 08/'26/91 80. 34
546.9 08/26/9I �i4._.2 08/26/97 =9. :3
566.29 08/2A/97 8093 09/26/97 2u.24
VENDOR TOTAL 2.,::7,08
•
PAGE 7 . ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-C10-01 � ` ' � ' .� , �� � .. MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR` ` . � CHECK CHECK ��'' INVOICE - , 'INVOICE
NO VENDOR NAME '' NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE � ` AMOUNT
' .
M34�_ MILEY'S SERINKLER SYS* 56630 08/26/97 6425 ' 06/13/97 252.59
VENDOR TOTAL 252.59
' -
M3490 MINAR FORD 56631 08/26/97 FOCS226932 08/26/97 58. 18
56631 08/26/97 660915 08/26y97 3.48
VENDOR TOTAL 61 .66
M3980 MINNESOTA CONWAY 56432 08/26/97 5M350402959 08/07/97 140.92
VENDOR TOTAL 140.92
M4290 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCI* 56633 08/24/97 45-157-1 07/18/97 24.00
-' ' ' ' - VENDOR TOTAL 24.00
M4598 MINNESOTA GOLF' CARS,-* ---'56634 '08/26/97 008947- - ----- 07/29 .97- 98.31
-\/
'
'� ' ��- _~_^�� .` �.''�' ' ENDOR��TOTAL����~- �98.31 -
M5470 MITA FINANCIAL SERVIC* 54435 08/26/97 19874661 08/01/97 102.99
VENDOR TOTAL 102.99
M6800 STATE CHEMICAL MFG CO 56636 08/26/97 07180081 07/18/97 - 119.59
VENDOR TOTAL 119.59
N0050 N E P CORPORAION 56637 08/26/97 02 441 08/26/97 64.65
VENDORTOTAL �- 44.45
°��N�� ' '
N^ �oo�����y NATIONWIDE TRUCK/TRAI*� '56638 08/26/97 37236 07/31/97 1597. �^
VENDOR TOTAL`'�'����� � 159�75 ��
N2900NIKEINC ��-'� '- - '��/ � ''����� ���� 5663908/26/97 25554349 � ^07/19/97 610. 19 �'��
- 56639 '08y26/97^2555621107/19/97
�' ' 103. 19~`'
56639 08/26/97 25556225 07/19/97 62~33
56639 08/26/97 25468100 07/26/97 112. 19
56639 08/26/97 25717628 08/01/97 112.27
VENDOR TOTAL 1000. 17
N13393 NORCOSTCO KNIGHTS FOR* 56640 08y26/97 021862 ' 08/04/97 47.43
VENDOR TOTAL 47.43
\13400 NORSEMAN AWARDS 56641 08/26/97 3263 08/15/97 345.06
VENDOR TOTAL 345.04
V3688 NORTH STAR PAINT/BODY* 56642 08/26/97 18015322 08/26/97 34.23
56642 08/26y97 18015293 08/26/97 35.45
VENDOR TOTAL 69.68
44200 NORTHERN STATES POWER* 56643 08y26/97 783550220210 08/01/97 1319.61 ^
56643 08/26/97 388457912210 08/01/97 72. 10
56643 08y26/97 281349293213 08y01/97 6.48
56643 08/26y97 778059313211 08/01/97 37.47
410
PAGE 8 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-C10-01
MOUNDS .VIEW
VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE
NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT
i .
56643 . U> /.�G/':i7 707053512211 08/01/97 ._; r�7
56643 08/26/97 794040397213 08/01/97 31 .24
5664..; 08/26/97 5.2604709421 08/01/97 572.7
56643 08/26/97 65854 399. 211 08/01/97 15. 36
56643 08/26/97 085659018211 08/01/97 4,9.A.:1
5664.3 03/ 6/97 493656813211 08/01/97 14.37
54443 08/26/97 35649486216 08/01/97 125..26
54643 08/26/97 745346795216 08/01/97 643.76
546,43 02/26/97 521503007213 08/01 /97 3912. A
56643 08/:'4/97 68002716922 3 08/01/9}7 50.44
54443 08/26/97 177347377216 08/01/97 24.22
VENDOR TOTAL 6934. 15
J4500 OLSON POWER & EOUIPME*• 56646 08/26/97 R94522 07/30/97 435.73
VENDOR ..TOTAL 435.73
:1685 REEDS SALES AND SERV I* 56447 02/26/97 013015 08/06/97 150.45
56647 08/26/97 012460 07/21/97 30.83
VENDOR TOTAL 181 .28.
,'20:10 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 56648 08/26/97 34690235 07/15/97 252.94
56648 08/26/97 38829553 00/07/97 146 .25
VENDOR TOTAL 399. 19
410
: PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY 56649 08
VENDOR TOTAL 1447.70
3600 PIPE RIGHT PLUMBING 56650 , 08/26/97 08/26/97 500.00
VENDOR TOTAL 500.00
';3700 P I TTMAN,. TIMOTHY 56651 _ 08/26/97 08/08/97 75.00
VENDOR TOTAL 75.00
3875 PLAISTED COMPANIES IN* 54652 08/26/:=+7 86,25 08/07/'77 772. 16
VENDOR TOTAL 772. 16
5`-,15 POMP''S TIRE SERVICE, * 5i- 5_ 08/26/97 777854 OG/04/.47
54453 06/24/97 773399 08/05/97 19.00
VENDOR TOTAL 50.78
-0 7_ PRINT CENTRAL 6,654 { ; / '! %:72.L _24 0-7/22/97 35.41
VENDOR -TOTAL. :5.41
0865 RAMSEY COUNTY 544555 OR:/26/Q7 80420047101 08/'26/97 1:1 .44
5x655 08/26/97 30414947101 08/26/97 10014. 10
5645_• 08. 26 j' ,7 8041484710 1 08 /-v,/c,7 72427.5
VENDOR TOTAL =.- _;' .09
'0:=90 REAL PRODUCTIONS 5x-,6 3:4 O8/'26/9'7 07567 08/14/97 31.8.4:
VENDOR TOTAL : 18.4:
4110
PAGE 9 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-Clo-bI MOUNDS .VIEW
VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE
NO VENDOR NAME - NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT
R5�Ri3A WAY EXPRESS 56657 08/26/979 f 2 - -
21 1 : . '-�f.J286 p,_/26/97 43.68
VENDOR TOTAL 47.:.6R
88000 RYDER STUDENT TRANSPO* 56655 08/2A/97 M91643 07/0;/97._ 105.00
56658 08/26/97 M93206 07/29/97
56658 08/24/97 M93210 07/30/97 175.00
VENDOR TOTAL AL ,00
S0100 S & M COMPANY 56659 08/26/97 0:3082.9 08/26/97 5:35.44
VENDOR TOTAL5=:5.44
S0500 ST. CRO I X RECREATION * 56660 08/26/97 1049A. 08/12/97 201 .70
56640 08/26/97 10506 0R/18/97 7:0.63
VENDOR .TOTAL ,., 232.3_s
S0555 SAFETY kLEEN CORN 56661 08/2A./97 10A,7. 9 ..: 0,a/2! /"7
VENDOR TOTAL 123.27
50675 ST. PAUL_ CITY OF 56662 08/26/97 72454 07/10/97 229.. 1'-
56662 08/26/97 72461 _ 07/10/97 205.40
56462 08/26/97 -049490 05/26/97 2324.26
VENDOR TOTAL 2758.94
11111
5.3;,- SHORT ELLIOTT. & HENDR* 5666=: 08/26/97 41671 08/26/97
869, '-
5666 : 08/26/97 08/26/97 700.00
VENDORTOTAL 1771 .75
33300 SHRED-IT 56664 08/26/97 11951 - - - . 0:3/26/97 -49.95....
VENDOR TOTAL _ ', 49.a .-.
3.535 SIGNS +• BANNERS 56665 08/26/97 16028 08/07/97 57.51
VENDOR TOTAL 57.51.
35605 SNYDER'S DRUG STORES,* 56666 08/26/97- 5044-004 08/19/97 7.72
56666 08/26/97 5044004 08/26/97 21 .24
56666 08:/' 4/97 08/26/97 5.52
VENDOR TOTAL 34.48
35700 SOLEM 'S TREE SERVICE 56667 08/26/97 30 18 06/26/975
- :x:72.7.^�
VENDOR TOTAL 372.75
;6000 SPALDING 56668 08/26/97 50(_75234 07/29/97 194. 16
VENDOR TOTAL 194. 16
t
i74co STREICHER 'S PROF. POL* 546 9 08/2 �,_, +',53.=,5, 8/1 /96 ; .
: _, .mac, : 7 ..•�U:•-.� G . 7 79.06
VENDOR TOTAL 79.0A
Z000 SUBURBAN PROPANE 56670 08/26/97 436156 07/30/97 :::0.89
54470 08/24/97 0024=;6156 03/24./97 30.89
II
PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-C10-01 �. . ' MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR
� CHECK CHECK '� INVOICE INVOICE
NO VENDOR NAME ` NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBRDATE AMOUNT
1111 '� � ` _ VENDOR TOTAL 61 .78
� `
S9600 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES 0* 56671 08 '
y26/97707291692 ' 07/29/97 465.21
5667108/26/97 708052240 08/05/97 '. 337.96
VENDOR TOTAL 803, 17
T0500 TAPE DISTRIBUTORS OF * 56672 08/26/97 77292 07/28/97 242.74
VENDOR TOTAL 242.76
T0700 TAUTGES, REDPATH & CO* 56673 08/26/97 7240 07/31/97 11143.50
VENDOR TOTAL 11143.50
T5798 TOLL GAS & WELDING SU* 56674 08/26/97 560717 08/26/97 5.58
VENDOR TOTAL 5.58
T5799 TOMAHAWK LIVE TRAP CO* 56675 08/26/97 T87739 ‘ � ' 07y31/97 -� � � 112. 12
VENDOR TOTAL 112. 12
.
U0401 U S WEST COMMUNICATIO* 56676 08/26/97 08/01/97 42.51
56676 08/26/97 08y01/97 1940.48
56676 08/26/97 08y01y97 20.86
VENDOR TOTAL2003 85
.
U3990 UNITED AGRI PRODUCTS 56678 08/26/97 0017933 05/27/97 788. 10
_�� _ `` VENDOR TOTAL 788.10
-' -- '
UUNITOO RENTAL SERVICE* 56679
.`08/26/97 740094427 07/23/97 '�� ` ��37.32
a
5667908y26/97740095447� � �� �07/30/97 45.79
5667908/26/97 740096375 08/06/97 ' '45. 14
54679 O8/26/97740096368 08/26,/97 182.53
5667908/26/97^740097307^' 08/26/97130~ 15
VENDOR TOTAL ` -- 440.93
W0681 WARNING SYSTEMS 56681 08/26/97 1290 08/26/97 910.35
VENDOR TOTAL ' 910.35
W0700 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BL* 56682 08/26y97 899-894558 07/23/97 87.87
56682 08y26/97 899-886704 06/24y97 70.97-
VENDOR TOTAL 16.90
W5500 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY CO* 56683 08/26/97 51599 08/26/97 88.41
VENDOR TOTAL 88.41
GRAND TOTAL 489166.81
II
GE 1
, � ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK RESIST
,-C1(>-02 ` MOUNDS VIEW
ENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE
NO VENDOR NAME ' NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT
41IkER STATES ELECTRI* 55466 08/07/97 � 08/26y97 303.53
VENDOR TOTAL 303.53
3191 SHELDON, PAMELA 55467 08/08/97 08/26/97 43.08
VENDOR TOTAL 43.08
'570 LINDQUIST BAKERY 55468 08/11/97 08/26/97 27.99
VENDOR TOTAL 27.99
;020 CHANHASSEN DINNER THE* 55469 08/12/97 016095 08/26/97 100.00
_ . . VENDOR TOTAL 100.00 ,
:755 PIZZA HUT 55470 08/12/97 08712797-000 08/26/97 ' ' 26.00 '' '
VENDOR TOTAL 26,00 i
(
'900 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 55471 08/13/97 -08/26/97 '_ 5695.26 . !
VENDOR TOTAL 5695.26
919 WESTERN BANK 55472 08/13/97 08/26/97 3905.24
55472 08y13y97 O /26y97 2024.33
55472 08/13/97 08/26/97 73827.57 -
55472 08/13/97 08/26/97 33335.03
VENDOR TOTAL 113092. 17
RETIREMENT08- TRUST* 55473 08/13/97 08/26/97 123,02
liliVENDOR TOTAL �� 123.02
500 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE554
� 74 08/13/97 ' ' 08/26/97 592~36
VENDOR TOTAL 592.36
888 HEALTHPARTNERS 55475 08/13/97 08/26/97 �'�'`� 512.79
' - VENDOR TOTAL 512.79
|
201 NORTHERN STATES POWER 55476 08/14/97 08/26y97 4719.85
VENDOR TOTAL 4719.85
300 SECRETARY OF STATE 55477 08/14/97 08/26y97 70.00
VENDOR TOTAL 70.00 \
'
D55 0 F 0 A 55478 08/14/97 08/26/97 380.00
VENDOR TOTAL 380.00
.
,
GRAND TOTAL 125686.05
1
f
^
III `
1
`
*
_
ITEM 8B
STAFF REPORT NO. 97-2190C
• interoffice
MEMORANDUM
to: •
Chuck Whiting
from: Mary Saarion
subject: Declaring Groveland playground equipment as surplus equipment authorizing staff to
discard in most cost effective way.
date: August 21, 1997
As you know, the old playground equipment at Groveland Park will be replaced with new
equipment. Installation is scheduled for the first week of September. The old equipment will
need to be removed and discarded. It is staffs request that the old equipment be declared surplus
equipment and authorize staff to rid of the equipment (combination of wood, metal and plastics)
in the most cost effective way.
i
Item No. /0 1:05
Staff Report No. q7,2i9/
Meeting Date: August 25, 1997
1110
Type of Business: PH
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA:Consent Agenda;CB: Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jennifer Bergman,Housing Inspector
Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 603, An Ordinance
Amending the Mounds View Municipal Code by Amending Chapter 1005
Entitled"Housing Code"
Date of Report: August 22, 1997
Summary:
In May staff addressed the City Council with some concerns regarding Chapter 1005 "Housing
Code" of the Mounds View Municipal Code. At the August 11 City Council meeting a Public
Hearing was set for revisions to the Housing Code to address issues regarding licensing of rental
property.
The Ordinance was to address concerns regarding the registration of specific properties such as
0 duplexes which have been converted to single-family homes, duplexes and fourplexes which are
owner-occupied but not subdivided, and townhouses and condominiums which have separate
parcel identification numbers and are owner-occupied. The Housing Code defines multiple
dwelling units as "a building or portion thereof containing two (2) or more dwelling units." The
Housing Code also states that"no person shall be allowed to be occupied or let to another for
occupancy units in a multiple dwelling for which a certificate of registration has not been
provided by the Building Inspection Department." Therefore, our Code states that we should
register all of the properties listed above.
Upon further discussion with the City Council at the May work session, it was determined that
some of these units would not need to be registered specifically the townhouses and
condominiums. Staff recommended drafting an Ordinance to address these issues.
Upon further discussion with Scott Riggs, acting City Attorney in Bob Long's absence, it was
determined that a revision to the Housing Code to address the licensing of specific rental
properties would not be in the best interest of the City. According to Mr. Riggs, it would be
more appropriate to address these issues in an Administrative Policy which would be authorized
by the City Council through Resolution.
Staff will be preparing an Administrative Policy which will be provided for your consideration at
the September 8 City Council meeting.
• _ ,
ai / L ink
Je 'fer Bqr, nan, Horlsing Inspector
V
ITEM 10 @ 7:10 PM
STAFF REPORT NO. 97-2192C
10 MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jim Ericson, Planning Associate
Subject: Silverview Estates Plat and Development Stage Review
Date: August 21, 1997
On August 11, 1997, I appeared before the Council to set a public hearing on August 25, 1997
for the Silverview Estates planned unit development at the southeast corner of Silver Lake Road
and Highway 10.
For two reasons I am requesting that this item not be discussed on August 25 as originally
planned. Because of a problem with the notice that was sent to the Pioneer Press, it did not get
published. While the notice was published in the Bulletin, it was not within the 10-day period as
required by City Code. In addition, the Planning Commission at its meeting on August 20, 1997
did not act on the proposal. As such, the public hearing cannot be held.
Therefore, I request that this item be tabled until September 8, 1997 pending action by the
Planning Commission.
•
•
Item No.
Staff Report No.
• Meeting Date: August 25, 1997
Type of Business: CB
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Mayor and City Council
From: James Ericson,Planning Associate
Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 602,An
Ordinance Related to Wetland Zoning Regulations and Amending
Title 1000, Chapter 1010, Sections 1010.07, 1010.08, and 1010.09 of
the Mounds View Municipal Code
Date of Report: August 25, 1997
Discussion:
This ordinance was heard at a public hearing and had its first reading before the City Council on
August 11, 1997. These issues were also discussed with City Council at a worksession on May 5,
1997, and the proposed ordinance was discussed at a worksession on August 4, 1997. The issues
are:
• • adding typical, minor construction projects to the list of activities for which administrative
authority is given for issuing permits
• creating two types of permits: a wetland alteration permit and a wetland buffer permit to
eliminate confusion
With respect to the first issue, the items which are now listed under administrative permits
include:
1. repair or maintenance of any lawful use existing on the effective date of the ordinance
2. alterations within the wetland buffer zone(which) do not extend into or impact the
adjacent wetland
3. public or private utility work on existing facilities
4. installation and maintenance of fences
5. landscaping and impervious surfaces up to 864 square feet
6. detached garages and accessory buildings
7. grading which does not adversely alter storm water storage capacity, storm water flow
direction or runoff intensity.
8. temporary structures not requiring permanent foundations or pads for support
Staff is suggesting that building additions and impervious surfaces which are 1264 square feet in
• size or less, and additions to detached garages, accessory buildings and driveways which do not
require a conditional use permit be added to this list. This would simplify the process for
homeowners who want to add porches, decks, patios and room additions.
City of Mounds View Staff Report
August 25, 1997
Page 2 •
With respect to the second issue, staff is proposing that two different terms be used for permits.
When the term"wetland alteration permit" is used for activities in the wetland buffer, it creates
confusion for citizens, because it sounds like work is being contemplated or allowed in the
wetland. Creating a separate"wetland buffer" permit would eliminate this confusion.
A copy of the proposed ordinance revisions is attached. What follows is a detailed list of the key
changes.
Page 2 Creating two types of permits: wetland alteration and wetland buffer permits.
Using the term"wetland alteration permit" for all permits, whether they are in the
buffer or in the wetland itself, causes some confusion with citizens and applicants
and often gives the wrong impression that work will be done in the wetland when
it will not.
Provision has been made where a project overlaps between the wetland and the
buffer that only one permit is required, and it shall be reviewed by the City Council
if any of the activities require City Council action.
Page 3-5 Standards for Approval of Permits has been reorganized to group items under
topics, so the discussion in staff reports of whether or not standards have been met •
can be done by topic rather than for 21 criteria.
Page 5-6 Standards for Denial of Permits are the same as are now in the ordinance, but are
underlined because they have been moved from Section 1010.09.
Page 6-7 Building and structural additions to a principal building where the addition does
not exceed 1264 square feet have been added to items which can be approved by
Administrative Authority i.e. Director of Community Development. The revisions
also clarify that additions to detached garages, accessory buildings and driveways
which do not require a conditional use permit, can be approved by Administrative
Authority.
Page 8 The considerations in granting approval are stricken because they have been
moved from this section to Page 10.
Page 10 Clarifies that action by City Council is to be done by resolution, and action by the
Director of Community Development by written notice.
Page 11 The section on variances and appeals has been changed to address appeals only.
Staff feels that it is a duplication of effort to require an applicant to get both a
variance and a wetland alteration or wetland buffer permit. The permit procedure •
substitutes for a variance.
City of Mounds View Staff Report
August 25, 1997
• Page 3
Recommendation:
Planning Commission, by a vote of 6-0, and staff recommend approval of Ordinance No. 602,
an ordinance related to wetland zoning regulations and amending Title 1000, Chapter 1010,
Sections 1010.07, 1010.08, and 1010.09 of the Mounds View Municipal Code.
James Ericson, Planning Associate
Attachments: Ordinance No. 602
N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\SPECPRO.TSP017.97\SP017.CC4
•
•
• ORDINANCE NO. 602
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE RELATED TO WETLAND ZONING REGULATIONS AND
AMENDING TALE 1000, CHAPTER 1010, SECTIONS 1010.07, 1010.08 and 1010.09
THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 1010.07 Subd. 1 of the Mounds View Municipal Code is hereby
amended as follows:
Subd. 1. I\ri iit Required Required Permits: Nu develupmcnt shall be allowcd a-ithin a
• • ''• •, • ••' A wetland alteration permit or a
wetland buffer permit shall be required for any development in a wetland zoning district as
provided in Section 1010.08 Subd. 2.
41)
Section 2. Section 1010.07 Subd. 3a.(3)(a) and(b) are hereby amended to read as
follows:
(a) All buildings, including other accessory buildings, as defined in Title 1100 of this
Code shall be setback at least one hundred feet(100') from a wetland, except as allowed
by an approved wetland alteration permit or approved wetland buffer permit as provided
in Section 1010.08
. . • ..' .'. _ . . .. • .1 .. . . . •
suLdi'isioli 110.1.01(3).
Section 3. Section 1010.08 is hereby amended to read as follows:
1010.08: WETLAND ALTERATION PERMITS
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS &PROCEDURES
Subd. 1.—Pecquirad Activities Requiring Permits: The following activities in or upon a
wetland zoning district shall require a altaatioa perinii either a wetland alteration
permit or a wetland buffer permit. as provided in Section 1010.08 Subd. 2.
a. The digging, dredging, filling, draining or in any way altering or removing any material
from a wetland.
S
Ordinance 602 •
July 14, 1997
Page 2
b. The alteration of vegetation within the wetland or the destruction of vegetation within
the wetland zoning district, except to abate a public nuisance.
c. The construction, alteration or removal of any structure.
d. The altering of any embankment or ponding area or the changing of the flow of water
or ponding capacity.
e. The storing of materials which would interfere with the flow of water and/or ponding
capacity.
f. Disposing of waste materials, including but not limited to demolition debris and yard
waste.
g. Installation or maintenance of essential services.
Subd. 2. Types of Permits Required: The following permits shall be required for any
development in a wetland zoning district. •
a. Wetland Alteration Permit: No development shall be allowed within that portion of a
wetland zoning district which is delineated as a wetland on the Wetland Zoning District
Map without first having obtained a wetland alteration permit from the City as provided
for in this Section 1010.08
b. Wetland Buffer Permit: No development shall be allowed in the area defined as the
wetland buffer area as shown on the Wetland Zoning District Map without first having
obtained a wetland buffer permit from the City as provided for in this Section 1010.08
c. Development Overlapping Wetland and Wetland Buffer Area: Authority for Approval
with Combinations of Activities Having Different Approval Authorities: Where
proposed development includes area in both the wetland and wetland buffer area. the
applicant shall only be required to apply for a wetland alteration permit which shall cover
the entire development area. Where a proposed development includes activities subject to
City Council approval. and activities subject to administrative approval, the permit shall
cover all activities and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council.
Said. 2. Subd. 3. Exceptions to Permit Requirements:
a. Emergencies: Upon the declaration of an emergency by the City, emergency work
necessary to preserve life or property shall be permitted in a wetland zoning district. •
• Ordinance 602
July 14, 1997
Page 3
b. Repairs: Upon application and approval by the City Council, a person may repair or
maintain any lawful use of land existing on the effective date hereof.
c. Recreation Areas or Parks: Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code to the
contrary, a person may develop a Municipally-owned recreation area or park facility on
City-owned lands which will involve the development within a wetland zoning district as
part of an integrated plan, comprising not less than seventy five (75) acres, where such
development would reasonably conserve, preserve and enhance the environment by
providing facilities that would protect the public health, safety and welfare.
Subd. 4y Standards for Approval of Permits: No permit shall be
issued unless the City finds and determines that the proposed development complies with
the following standards as stated in this Subd. 4.
•9 o o.:' • . • . Approval of either a wetland
alteration permit or wetland buffer permit shall constitute approval of a variance to the
. requirements of this Chapter 1010.
a. Minimum Alteration in Ecological and Hydrological Characteristics: A minimum
alteration of a wetland may be allowed when necessary for the use of property but only
when it will not have a substantially or significantly adverse effect, as determined by the
City, upon the ecological and hydrological characteristics of the wetland. However, in no
case shall the restrictions set out below in Section 1010.08 Subd. 3.a.(1)-(6)be exceeded.
Since the extent of alteration which can be permitted is limited, the City, when considering
a permit application, shall consider equal apportionment of alteration opportunity. The
alteration opportunity within the wetland shall be allocated among property owners in
proportion to the area of wetland located within each property.
(1) Any alteration shall not cause a reduction in the flood storage capacity of the
wetland. Flood storage capacity shall be determined by analysis of the runoff from the
entire developed wetland drainage district resulting from both the 2-year and 100-year
frequency, 24-hour SCS Type I distribution storms.
(2) An alteration shall not reduce the existing water quality enhancement value of
a wetland under conditions of ultimate development, during both the 2-year and 100-year
frequency, 24-hour SCS Type I distribution storms. Water quality enhancement value of a
wetland shall be determined using methods approved by the City.
(3) Any alteration shall not reduce the existing wildlife habitat value of a wetland
as measured using methods approved by the City.
• ( Alterations shall be carried out so as to minimize the impact on vegetation.
Ordinance 602 •
July 14, 1997
Page 4
Removal of vegetation within a wetland zoning district shall be permitted only when
reasonably required for the placement of structures and use of property.
0_0) Alterations shall not adversely affect the water flow characteristics within
the wetland as determined by the City.
WO- Storm water runoff from a development may be directed to the wetland
when in conformance with the Local Water Management Plan' and only when
substantially, as determined by the Council, free of sediment, debris and chemical
pollutants and only at rates which will not substantially disturb vegetation or increase
turbidity as determined by the City.
X7)(15) The proposed action shall not cause storm water runoff from the
development to take place at a rate which would exceed the rate or volume of runoff as
anticipated by the City's Local Water Management Plane.
( -6) The quality of water infiltrated to the water table or aquifer shall remain
substantially, as determined by the City, unchanged by the alteration of the site.
(9) No part of any sewage disposal system requiring on-land or in-ground disposal
of waste shall be located closer than one hundred feet(100')from the wetland. All
on-land or in-ground sewage disposal systems shall meet criteria set out in Minnesota Rule
6, MCAR 4.8040,Individual Sewage Treatment System Standard
(10) Waste which would normally be disposed of at a solid or hazardous waste
disposal site or which would normally be discharged into a sewage disposal system or
sewer shall not be, directly or indirectly, discharged to a wetland.
b. Soil Conditions; Control of Erosion:
J.(11) Construction erosion control measures and retention facilities shall be
designed to limit soil loss from the development site to not more than five (5) tons per
acre per year. Plans and supporting documentation for such measures and facilities shall
be developed and approved by the City prior to commencement of construction.
Z1 +2j The applicant for the wetland alteration permit or wetland buffer permit
shall be required to demonstrate that, after the development is completed, the conditions
' See Chapter 1302 of this Code. t
2 See Chapter 1302 of this Code.
• Ordinance 602
July 14, 1997
Page 5
on site will be stabilized such that the yearly soil loss from the site will not be greater than
five-tenths (0.5) ton per acre per year.
(31( -3-) Sediment and soil loss shall be determined utilizing the Universal Soil
Loss Equation as defined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation
Service Technical Field Guide, as amended from time to time, as provided for Ramsey
Soil and Water Conservation District.
(4) Only fill substantially free of chemical pollutants and wastes, as determined by
the City, may be used.
L1(19)A building's minimum elevation permitted in a wetland zoning district shall
be as defined in the Local Water Management Plana.
(„6_1(- 6j No alteration shall be allowed which will endanger the health, safety or
welfare of persons or which may result in unusual road maintenance costs or utility line
breakages due to soil limitations, including high frost action.
• (6j Scheduling of work: Work in the wetland will not be performed during the breeding
season of water fowl or fish spawning season.
j-(-7j Size of area: The size of the altered area shall be limited to the minimum required
for the proposed action.
-. .. 9'1 _ , • .l . • • •.'I .', , ., • . . :: . I
•. , .. . P. . • • P . I :: • ..
(18) All accessory buildings, as dvf.,ied n Title 1100 of this Cock, shallbset
P. • .. • . . • I . .. • • : • • I •.
• •.. • • • • •• I1 . •• .. . • I . .. . . I •
only when rcaaonably required fur the placement of sty actures and trsof property.
Subd. 5. Standards for Denial of Permits: No wetland alteration or wetland buffer permit may
be granted which would allow any use that is prohibited in the zoning district in which the
property is located or which will:
a. Result in incompatible land uses or which would be detrimental to surface and ground
water resources.
•
3 See Chapter 1302 of this Code.
Ordinance 602 .
July 14, 1997
Page 6
b. Increase the financial burdensimposed on the community through increasing floods and
overflow of water onto land areas within this City or onto land areas adiacent to Rice
Creek.
c. Be not in keeping with land use plans and planning objectives for the City or which will
increase or cause danger to life or property.
d. Be inconsistent with the objectives of encouraging land uses compatible with the
preservation of the natural land forms, vegetation and wetlands within the City.
e. Include development of land and water areas essential to continue the temporary
withholding of rapid runoff of surface water which contributes to downstream flooding or
water pollution or development of land and water areas which provide ground water
recharge or development which diminishes the land or water which are necessary to carry
increased flows of storm water following periods of heavy precipitation.
Subd. 4 6 Permit Issuing Authority: The issuing authority for wetland alteration permits shall
be as set forth hereinafter:
•
a. Administrative Issuing Authority:
The Director of Community Development or designee
•' • • • • .1 shall have has the authority to issue wetland
alteration or wetland buffer permits which meet the standards in this Chapter iffor the
following types of activities:
(-a3The-permit-requests Repair or maintenance of any lawful use of land
existing on the effective date hereon.
• • • • .. , .. .1 • •• • • •U . • • • • • •• •I.
adjacem wetla,xl.
( Th.permit regu.ata Public and/or private utility work on existing facilities.
(2) The Diie.tor of Public Works/City Biiguie.r or d.,Si .e
• .1 1 . . • • • • • •• .1 • .1 • • • 1 • • 1 • •- 1 -
.. .. •• .1 • •• • •• •• • . •• .• . . . _ . .
(3) Alterations within the wetland buffer if they do not extend into or create an •
adverse impact the adjacent wetland as follows:
• Ordinance 602
July 14, 1997
Page 7
(a) Installation and maintenance of fences.
(b) Landscaping, and impervious surfaces which surfaces do not exceed 1,264
square feet
(c) Detached garages, accessory buildings and driveways, and additions thereto
which do not require a conditional use permit.
(d) Grading which does not adversely alter storm water storage capacity, storm
water flow direction or runoff intensity.
(e) Temporary structures not requiring permanent foundations or pads for
support.
(0 Building and structural additions to a principal building which addition does not
exceed 1.264 square feet.
• b. City Council Authority: The City Council may issue permits which meet the standards
in this Chapter and are beyond the scope of the administrative authority stated in Section
1010.08 Subd. 5.a. approval-above. which hay.bccn reviewed by City staff and referred
tv Couacil or which are appealed to Council after having been reviewed and denied by
City staff.
Subd. 5 7. Application and Review Procedures:
a. Submittal Materials Required: : The following drawings and
exhibits may be required with a permit application, unless specific items are waived by the
Director of Community Development based on the scope of the proposed development:
( The name and address of the subdivider, developer and owner or any other
party of interest.
b- A legal description of the proposed site with a map showing its location
with indications of private access roads and existing or proposed public roadways
within and surrounding the development site.
C3j A full and adequate description of all phases of the operation and/or
proposed physical changes.
• d- 141 A soil survey map of the proposed development site.
e- 1 A topographic map of the development area with contour information at
Ordinance 602 •
July 14, 1997
Page 8
two foot (2') intervals or spot elevations at two hundred foot (200') intervals and
at a horizontal scale of one inch to one hundred feet (1"=100') or larger.
f. j A detailed site plan of the proposal showing:
hr j information on existing drainage and vegetation of all lands within
the site and to a distance of five hundred feet (500') surrounding the site or
to the wetland drainage district boundary, whichever is shorter.
g- j! the location of existing and future
man-made features within the site and to a distance of five hundred feet
(500') surrounding the site or to the wetland drainage district boundary,
whichever is shorter.
Oa proposed drainage, grading and landscaping
l The time period for commencement and completion of the development,
including time for staging of development, if applicable. •
jr(a) Design specification and plan for all sediment and erosion control measures
as well as all grading and drainage appurtenances and practices.
is
al Engineering data related to computations of existing and proposed
hydrology, water quality, hydraulics and soil loss.
-i-(10) Such additional information as necessary to evaluate the permit
application.
. ... •. . '• . '• '• . .1 ' _ • •• • • .1. . • . . • • .1 . . • • • •
I .1 • • •• .1 • .1 • • • I , • . . . . . . . . ' .1 • ; •1 • • ••
' ' '
■ 1 I • • • .A . • • 1 • •• • • • 1 • _ • •• • •• .1 • .1 • • . I
. • • . • • • •1 • • HI •.1 • • • . I • '• • • 1 . • ,
indudi�ig.
•
• •• 1 . • . ••• • • • • • • .1 .1 • I •I. •
b. The impact of the proposed *ctland altcratioil on the surface Water storage, fish and
wildlife habitat and water quality eiilrancemcnt-alues of the wetland.
l2, Subd. 7. Processing of Application:
• Ordinance 602
July 14, 1997
Page 9
will The permit application shall be submitted to the City. The City shall process
the permit application according to the provisions of this Section 1010.08
strixlivisioir 4 hereof. For permits requiring City Council action. the Community
Development Department shall prepare a report and recommendation for
consideration by City Council prior to the City Council taking action on the permit
application. The Community Development Department or the City Council may
refer the permit application to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its
recommendation prior to action being taken on the permit application. orthe City
..: . • •• . .. • • . • . I • . . t •
• '. I I • .
•
sct forth in Titles 1100 of the Municipal Cod..
b-a)A wetland alteration permit may be processed concurrently coextensively
with any other application for use permit approval that may be required under
other provisions of the Municipal Code.
c_,. Subd. 8. Action on Permit.Conditions:
• a (1) Compliance with standards: No wetland alteration or wetland buffer permit
shall be approved except it meet the standards set forth in Section 1010.08 Subd.
4. A permit may be approved subject to conditions
reasonable and necessary to ensure compliance with the requirententr contained-in
aforementioned standards in Subd. 4. Such
conditions may, among other matters:
(a)O Provide for the enhancement of wdlaad storm water storage, fish
and wildlife habitat, and water quality enhancement functions of wetland
zoning districts;
al(2) Provide for enhancement of recreation and education opportunities
in wetland zoning districts;
(c)(3) Limit the size, kind or character of the proposed work;
j (4) Require the construction of storm water detention facilities or other
structures;
j4(5) Require replacement of vegetation;
(6) Establish required monitoring or maintenance procedures, including
the payment of costs for such procedures;
Ordinance 602 .
July 14, 1997
Page 10
f3) Stage the work over time and increments of land to be developed;
f8j Require the alteration of the site design to insure buffering;
Require posting of sufficient surety to guarantee conformance to the
purposes of the permit and all laws regulating the activity;
a-performance bond, or
(-1-@) Require the conveyance to the City of certain lands or interest
therein.
Ir (2)Modification of Zoning Requirements: The dimensional requirements of the
underlying zoning ordinance may be modified in furtherance of the purposes of this
Chapter.
(3) Considerations in Granting of Approval: The City shall consider all relevant
factors specified in other sections of this Chapter. as well as the following:
a. The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan and the •
impact of the proposed use on the wetlands in the surrounding area.
b. The impact of the proposed wetland alteration on the surface water
storage. fish and wildlife habitat and water quality enhancement values of
the wetland.
c (4) Action by Resolution or by Written Notice: Action on permits shall be by
the City Council or by the Director of Community Development, as provided in
Section 1010.08 Subd. 6. A permit approval may include such terms and
conditions as is deemed necessary by the approval body to protect the public
health, safety and welfare and to meet the standards set forth in this Chapter 1010.
For permits requiring City Council action. the City Council shall take action to
approve. approve with conditions. or deny a permit application by resolution. For
permits allowing action by the Director of Community Development, the director
shall notify the applicant in writing of the decision on the permit. 131JoA approval
• . . . , • • • . i , ' •• 1 . • • . • • •
• •' '• , '1 . ••' '• • • • IV .11 • • I 1 • • • • :: •
/ •• , .A I •• • • • • •• • .1 .1 • •1 • •• . .,
' ••' •• ' • • t. • • • • - • .• •• • • • ., • •• ••
• •
•
• • •'• • ' '• •••••• • , 1 • • .1 • I • • •, •
S
Ordinance 602
July 14, 1997
Page 11
. . •• . .• • • .1 • • •• • • • • , ' • .. ' . . '
. • • • • , I . •• • • • . .1 • • I 1 . • • .: •
I •• , . • .5 • • I • . • ' • .. d . •• ., , . .', _
• •
•
I. • • I . . • • - • .11 ., • I • .• • .• .• • I I
.� . .. . �. . _ . •' • • • • • • • • •'• • 'I '•
100G.0G oftlds Titlo may also he r.quircd.
Subd. 9. Subd. 8. Expiration;Extensions and Renewals: A permittee shall begin the work
authorized by the permit within ninety(90) days from the date of issuance of the permit
unless otherwise set forth in the permit. The permittee shall complete the work authorized
by the permit within the time limit specified on the permit which shall in no event exceed
more than twelve (12) months from the date of issuance unless such time limit is extended
by the Coa.icil approval authority. The permittee shall notify the City at least forty eight
(48) hours prior to the commencement of work. Should the work not be commenced as
specified herein, the permit shall become void. (Ord. 505, 4-27-92)
Section 4. Section 1010.09 of the Mounds View Municipal Code is hereby amended as
follows:
11,
1010.09: APPEALS:
Subd. 1. Applk,ation fur Variance or Appeal An applicant may appeal the denial of a wetland
alteration or wetland buffer permit by the Director of Community Development to the City
Council. An appeal shall be filed in writing no more than 14 days following the date of the
decision by the Community Development Director. The appeal shall be scheduled for
consideration by City Council at the next regular City Council meeting which is at least
seven days from the date of the appeal Consideration of appeals shall be in accordance
with the standards and procedures set forth in this Chapter 1010. A decision by the City
Council shall be final. An applioatioi2 fur variance or appal to th. Council Tall be
• • •I . • •'• • ;
• •
.
.•. • •• • • I 5.5 • • .5 .5 . • .• .. • • ■ :4 .1 • •• I •••. • ••• • •• .1 •
use that is prohibited in the zoning dist,ict in whish the property is located or which will:
•. • . U. . I • • • " I ••.• • . • .1 • I • .I • I •• •
waterrescarcer
b-. Increas.,th.&uncial burd.ns imposed on the community through incr.asing floods and
oveifluw of./vatvi onto land arias .Aithi1i this City or oiito land ar..as adjacent to Rice
• Creep.
•
Ordinance 602 •
July 14, 1997
Page 12
•
ID • .. .1 . . . .. .1 . • .1 1 • .. • • • .. i .. 11
' •. • • • • .1 • • • •• •
• •
•. • • •• • •• .141 .• • . • •• • ••
' •
• • . • • • ■ .1 .1 • • , • _ . '• .A • •• .� • •• '
. • . • • • • .1 I •P . .1 .w .1 • • . •• .1 •
ft
•• 1 • • • • • 111 P • i • . • . I • .• • • • •• .1 • •••' • •
••. •• • • • • • •• • .� • .� . .� .w • • •'• v •.
•A '
L • • • • • • 1 • 1 11 1 .� • • • . • .A .� • .�
•w • • • •• • • • I • •• 1 • •. • • • •. •
Subd. 3. Suppurting Data. Nu permit va,iancz shall be issued unless tht. applk.wit, iu,uppui t
. . • 1 • • .11 • • 1 J• ' - . . W. • • • , • .• .• • • • • • • •
' •
.w • • . p • • • • 11 : • . • • • . •
•
Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of
, 1997. •
Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of
, 1997.
Duane McCarty, Mayor
ATTEST
Charles S. Whiting, City Clerk-Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Robert Long, City Attorney
N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\SPECPROJ SP017.97\WETLAND.ORD •
1
1 Item No. 8 6
Staff Report No. q7— 9ci
III Meeting Date: August 25, 1997
Type of Business: CB
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jim Ericson, Planning Associate
Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution 5151, a Resolution Approving a
Development Review for McDonalds Restaurant Located at 2201
Highway 10.
Date of Report: August 22, 1997
Background:
The applicant, Gary Meyer, is proposing to demolish the existing McDonalds restaurant located at
2201 Highway 10 and replace it with a similarly sized restaurant moved approximately 30 feet more
toward the center of the lot. Mr. Meyer has indicated the existing restaurant, which was built in
1974, no longer meets the company's current needs in terms of building layout and function. More
specifically, the kitchen area is becoming increasingly incompatible with the current menu offerings.
• A playland has been discussed for this location for which adequate room is available, however it is
not part of the current plans.
Analysis:
Dimensional Requirements:
Required Provided Met/Not Met
Building Height: S 45 feet 17 feet Met
Building Setbacks
Front(Highway 10): 30 feet 50 Feet Met
Front (Program Ave.): 30 Feet 65 Feet Met
West Side: 10 Feet 50 Feet Met
East Side: 10 Feet 122 Feet Met
Rear: 20 feet 80 Feet Met
Parking Lot Setbacks
Front (Highway 10): 30 Feet 30 Feet Met
Front (Program Ave.): 30 Feet 30 Feet Met
East Side: 5 Feet 7.5 Feet Met
West Side: 5 Feet 7.0 Feet Met
Rear: 5 Feet 10 Feet Met
Design:
0 The one-story building is proposed to be 17 feet tall and oriented in the same manner as the existing
building, only shifted 34 feet to the east. The design and appearance of the proposed building will
not differ significantly from the existing building. The design to be used is the standard design theme
used for all newer McDonalds.
1
Resolution 5151,McDonalds Development Review
Planning Case No. 500-97
August 25, 1997
Page 2 •
Access and Drive Aisles:
Access to the building will be from Program Avenue via two curb cuts spaced 40 feet apart as
required by City Code. The positioning of the curb cuts will change only slightly from their existing
configuration. Curb cuts in a B-3 zoning district are allowed to be 30 feet in width. The horizontal
widths of the curb cuts are 25 feet and 24 feet, yet measured along the property line, the widths
increase to 43 feet and 32 feet, respectively. It is staff's opinion that the appropriate measurement
should be taken horizontally, and in doing so, the widths comply with the Code. The drive aisles are
proposed to be 24 feet wide. These are adequate on the east side of the building. On the west side,
the drive-through lane takes up 10 feet of the 24-foot drive aisle.
Drainage:
The site, which covers 50,001 square feet, is located near Rice Creek. Sites located closer than 300
feet to Rice Creek or those in excess of 2.5 acres require review By Rice Creek Watershed District.
The applicant has provided a letter for the City's review from Sunde Land Surveying, Inc., stating
that the McDonalds parcel is 487 feet from the closest edge of Rice Creek. This letter, dated July
12, 1997, has been attached. The grading and drainage plans have been submitted to Rocky Keehn,
the City's Engineer, for review. In a memo dated August 7, 1997, Mr. Keehn responded that the
overall impervious surface on the site will not increase with this development. However, because of
the relocation of the building, the drainage patterns may shift, causing additional runoff in a particular
area. The applicant has submitted revised drainage plans showing existing and proposed drainage
flows, which have been reviewed and deemed acceptable by Mr. Keehn. Mr. Keehn recommends
that no water quality treatment methods be required for this redevelopment proposal due to site
constraints and the limited runoff generated.
Landscaping:
Much of the existing landscaping present around the perimeter of the lot will be retained. The
landscape plan includes a planting schedule for the trees and shrubs to be added around the building
and in the island separating the two curb cuts. Two larger evergreens existing near the front of the
lot are proposed to be transplanted to the rear of the lot because of the shifted curb cuts. Rick
Wriskey, the City Forester, has reviewed the planting schedule and has indicated that it is acceptable.
Lighting
Parking lot lighting will be accomplished by four 24-foot tall standards, each with two 1000 watt
metal halide lamps. The photometric analysis provided by the applicant indicates that the lighting
meets the requirement as set forth in Section 1103.09 of the Zoning Code, whereby light from the
property shall not exceed one foot-candle-as measured from the centerline of adjacent streets. The
Code also states that no bulbs may be visible from adjoining properties and that they be hooded or
shielded to prevent glare.
Signage:
The existing pylon sign on the property will be retained in its present position. No other ground- •
mounted signage is proposed other than four small directional signs at the entries to the site. On the
building front, there will be:approximately 40 square feet of signage which will display the name of
the restaurant. On either building side, the company logo will be attached to the wall. Both signs are
approximately 20 square feet in area. These are within the limits as set forth by the Code.
Resolution 5151,McDonalds Development Review
Planning Case No. 500-97
August 25, 1997
• Page 3
Parking:
Given estimated square-footages for the kitchen and dining areas of the proposed building at 1,000
square feet and 1,600 square feet respectively, the applicant would need to provide a minimum of 53
parking spaces. This total is based on the following ratios:
Kitchen area(1 space per 80 square feet): 1,000 divided by 80 = 13 spaces
Dining Area(1 space per 40 square feet): 1,600 divided by 40 =40 spaces
Total spaces required: 53 spaces
The applicant is proposing 75 spaces, four of which would be handicapped-accessible, 7 of which
would be designated as "compact cars only." The applicant believes that the higher than required
number of parking stalls is necessary to adequately meet his company's needs.
Other Referral Agency Comments:
Mark Bishop, Fire Marshal for Spring Lake Park/Blaine/Mounds View Fire Department, indicated by
memo that he had no comments.
Previous Action:
40 On August 20, 1997, The Planning Commission approved Resolution 527-97, a resolution
recommending approval of a development review for McDonalds restaurant to demolish the existing
building and to replace it with a more efficient restaurant configuration.
Recommendation:
Approve Resolution 5151 approving a development review for McDonalds Restaurant, located at
2201 Highway 10, subject to stipulations.
(\-/Am^-0 12-wlep"----
James Ericson, Planning Associate
Attachments:
1. Resolution 5151
2. Planning Application
3. Zoning Map
4. Memo from Rocky Keehn,City Engineer,dated 8!7/97
5. Memo from Mark Bishop,Fire Marshal,dated 8/7/97
6. Letter from Sunde Land Surveying,Inc.,dated 7/12/97
7 Revised Plans,dated 8/14/97
8. Planning Commission Resolution 527-97
• N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\500-97\MCD-RPT.CC
t
RESOLUTION NO. 5151
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
FOR McDONALDS RESTAURANT,LOCATED AT 2201 HIGHWAY 10;
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. 500-97
WHEREAS, Gary Meyer, representing McDonalds, has applied for a development review
to replace the existing McDonalds Restaurant with a similarly sized building at 2201 Highway 10 ,
property zoned B-3, Highway Business District, legally described as follows:
Lot 1, Block 3, Programmed Land First Addition,
County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota
WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a
development review be conducted for this and similar projects; and,
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the following documents
regarding this development review request:
1. Planning Application
2. Zoning Map
3. Revised Plans, dated 8/14/97
4. Memo from Rocky Keehn, City Engineer, dated 8/7/97
5. Memo from Mark Bishop, Fire Marshal, dated 8/7/97
6. Letter from Sunde Land Surveying, Inc., dated 7/12/97
7. Planning Commission Resolution 527-97
WHEREAS, the City Council has made findings that the application from Gary Meyer,
representing McDonalds, meets the dimensional requirements as stated below:
Required Provided Met/Not Met
Building Height: s 45 feet 17 feet Met
Building Setbacks:
Front (Highway 10): 30 feet 50 Feet Met
Front (Program Ave.): 30 Feet 65 Feet Met
West Side: 10 Feet 50 Feet Met
East Side: 10 Feet 122 Feet Met
Rear: 20 feet 80 Feet Met
Parking Lot Setbacks:
Front (Highway 10): 30 Feet 30 Feet Met
Front (Program Ave.): 30 Feet 30 Feet Met
East Side: 5 Feet 7.5 Feet Met .
West Side: 5 Feet 7.0 Feet Met
Rear: 5 Feet 10 Feet Met
I
Resolution 5151
41) McDonalds Development Review
August 25, 1997
Page 2
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find that the landscape plan as proposed
satisfies the requirements of the Municipal Code; and,
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed the drainage plan for this site and has found
it acceptable and consistent with the Master Drainage Plan previously approved by the City
Council and Rice Creek Watershed District; and,
WHEREAS, the City Fire Marshal has reviewed the site plans and finds the layout meets
Fire Department requirements for emergency vehicle access; and,
WHEREAS, the approximately 80 square feet of signage indicated on the site plans is
within the 100 square feet allowed by the Municipal Code; and,
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission, on August 20, 1997, has
recommended approval of this development review request in Resolution 527-97.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View City Council does
0 hereby approve the development review for the McDonalds reconstruction project located at
2201 Highway 10 as presented by Gary Meyer subject to the following contingency:
1. Prior to obtaining building permits for this redevelopment project, the applicant
shall enter into a development contract with the City as required by Section
1006.06, Subd. 4 of the Municipal Code which sets forth all of the conditions,
terms, requirements, agreements, guarantees and plans for the orderly development
of the site.
Adopted this 25th day of August, 1997.
Duane McCarty, Mayor
ATTEST:
Charles Whiting, City Clerk/Administrator
(SEAL)
N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\500-97\MCD-RES.CC
•
Cr:ci
1 II C•NnT.r7�)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
= DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
v T 2401 Eghway 10, Mounds View IsiLN 55112
...a,
'0/.1.„. • oi
�" 612-784-3055
612-784-3462 -FAX
Please Type or Print Information-Complete Both Sides of This Form
Applicant Information
i
Name of Applicant
Ml b o„iAL6 Pie4-r ail Telephone C/2- t85'-'13f
Address ../w. 242— 5r 5;)7-z gao Fax
b,I-00AI J1:r,SI/0 My 15-41/
•
Interest in Property(check.1uuiup.iate box)
y1- Owner of Property
Contract for Deed Owner
C Lessee,Ope:ator,Manager
C Agreement to Pm-chase
C Other(explain)
Applicants must provide evidence of interest in property at the time of application,and if you are not the owner of the
property,you must provide a Ietter of permission from the owner giving consent to the filing of this application. The
property owner must sign this application for it to be accepted.. 111111
Property Description/Proposal
address or Geacal.Location Sf ft' 1i-- fAG,1,7 j1 5/21,21/4.; f -7,-10/ /o1u�4 • i O
Legal Description LOT I , SI vex. 3, Pioyru.rn,,,.ac1 1.64-,t d rs4- eN,
Property Identification T(PU44) V' 3O - 7 -- q(-4 — 000'!
4ofAm= 50.001 S4. c-c-- 1 t acre
Current Zoning 6 - 3 , t-(4,L w'1 F ! •n€.;s .�z , L L.
j 4
1.1==t Use Type of Application
Undeveloped/Vacant C Comprehensive Plan Amendment S200
C Sinzie Family Dwelling a Re`oning 5200/ac;min 5200 max S1000
DuoiexiTwo Family Dwelliuz — Major Subdivision 52.50-5250 deposit=
Multi-family Dwellings — tenor Subdivision 51:0
,cc BusinessrCon:mcciai Esrablisiim t C Planned Unit Development(PUD)- 5350
C
Industrial Establishment C PUD Amendment 5150
,- Other(e:cpiaia) — Conditional Use Permit R-1,R-2 575;ail others 5200
Variance R-1,R-2 575;all others 520(:
a Code Appeal S75
J1( Develop Review/Site Plan S 100/ac;min 5100 max 5500
C Rir.,1and Alteration Permit 550+deposit'
C Wr'and 9utfer Permit 7
Floodplain Permit 5200
411
Other
•
`ser Municipal Code for expianation of deposits
Please complete the reverse side of this application.
' City of Mounds View,MN
Development Application Page 2
III
Property Classification 3d Abstract a Torr
Description of Proposal 5F e C�---w mdn
BY MY(OUR) SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION,I.I a Y DECLARE THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY
•
•
KNOWLEDGE,THE 11FORMATION PROVIDED IS TR . • u ACCURATE.
Signature of Applicantk 1/.4
Name of Applicant(Lyped/prnued) 6Aity AftC'
Signanrre of Pr ooer ty Owner 1 i /
Name of Propm-ty Owner(typed/atinted) �1 G h 1 111
,4 S 6v r?P.
•
s
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date of Submittal .3, 4c) yct -i
Date of acct canoe J s,.t ?S- t C c, 7
-•`1 I Assigned to: ,••
Pla g Case Vo. Coo- Q?7 60-day Limit 4 -23-y 7 120-day Limit ( t-22 -5 7
Few Paid: Accu t C'.aecic
Application: 1r ,o .7 `f.5-5 _,--6,r o1O
?irk Dedication:
sits:
qp
:
Total:
C.`.OFF?CZWFWENtiWPDOCSIAD ` .FORMSIDEVAPRAOR ;,4
CO RC....,.. •<--- f
Z M N
y3 l
�N, N 5275 5267
1
ile
`L
5263
•
F- PUD 5251 > I
N
,-.0Q
w •
0 5230
N IN
260 W000ALE OR
,`
5250 ti, N a 0
0
5240 5205 c`I 5200 N N :' I
ME Z 5201 :;':;•
lz-
CO
•
op,,,,
4
a
5200= ti��� ,-1,1,1" 51sa a I
1./ .' Nr� NN NN
,11
B-3 1"tiI
Ni Q!
1 IlN
0,`PUD o :- N •
N w I
fib lk <'.4).o , •
Itii� r\GasAfk O� CP 0�&
A
11, ,�� CQE. 3
R � I
'41 IP cum
N r.
C33 gli:
N W
�� Q
8 3
CC
t—
CRP — I
•
ClICIP . b../i
ANIL
w1
4(1 :Mr 1 ►`1
II TOWNS EDGE TERRACE •
•
a MOBILE HOME PARK
r-Je . •en rli•ummi of •,- a—3 . lio I
Zoning Map Planning Case 500-97
Applicant: McDonalds Restaurant INT
Location: 2201 Highway 10
08/08/97 FRI 14:14 FAX 612 490 2150 SEH 0003
ill
,seti
MEMORANDUM
■ST.PAUL,MN C MINNEAPOLIS, MN O ST.CLOUD, MN C CHIPPEWA FALLS,WI ❑MADISON,WI ❑LAKE COUNTY,IN
TO: Jim Ericson, City of Mounds View
FROM: Rocky J. Keehn 9.-•
DATE: August 7, 1997
RE: Review of McDonalds, City Planning Case 500-97, SEH File No. AMOITND9701.00
Our review was based on a set of plans received by the City on July 25, 1997. The grading and drainage plan
reviewed was printed on July 23, 1997. Based on this set of plans, the proposed building relocation will not alter.
the current impervious and pervious surface area amounts that currently exist on the site. Therefore, the total runoff
from the site should not change with the reconstruction. Our concern is not the amount of runoff, but how the
drainage patterns for the proposed runoff may be altered since there are three discharge locations of runoff from the
site. The three discharge locations are to a curb-cut on the east side of the parking lot, the south entrances to the
parking lot and a catch basin at the end of the drive thru.
410Based on the information provided for our review,it cannot be determined exactly where the existing and proposed
runoff drains from the site. Also,flow from the catch basin at the current drive thru is not shown on the plans. To
document the drainage patterns, the developer needs to submit a drainage map which shows where all the runoff
from the site will go for both the existing conditions and for the proposed. If the drainage patterns differ from those
that currently exist, the developer's engineer will need to calculate the expected changes in flow rates to the
downstream drainage systems and determine if these changes will cause any adverse impacts. All maps and
calculations will need to be submitted for our review.
The applicant will also need a Rice Creek Watershed District(RCWD) permit if the area is more than 2.5 acres or
within 1000 feet of a DNR protected wetland. Due to its location near Rice Creek, the applicant should check to
see if a RCWD permit is required. If a permit is required,RCWD will likely encourage the developer to construct
measures to improve the water quality of runoff from the site. Based on our review,it appears due to site constraints
that an above ground water quality system is unfeasible. An underground system could be built,but since it would
be a private system,maintenance would be a problem. Therefore,we would recommend that for this site no water
quality treatment methods be required as part of the reconstruction.
In order to complete our review,the developer must submit the following:
I. Provide the location of the discharge from the catch basin at the end of the current drive-thru
2. Drainage Map- Existing Conditions
3. Drainage Map- Proposed Conditions
4. Drainage calculations if the existing and proposed differ
5. RCWD permit applications if applicable or if not applicable please indicate why
ii•If you have any questions or if I may be of further service please call me at 490-2026.
RIK/rjk/INIER
SAWATERIANOMECIAROCKYMWEMOSWOlNDV WJES
08/07/97 THU 10:39 FAX X001 •
•
•
FAx TRANsMIssIoN
rAx:
To: Jim Ericson Date: August 7, 1997
Fax#: 784-3462 Pages: 1 , including this cover sheet
From: Mark Bishop
!I Subject: Planning Case g- 500-97
COMMENTS: Looks fine, we have no concerns.
•
•
•
Sunde Land Surveying, Inc.
• 9001 E. Bloomington Freeway
Bloomington, MN 55420
PRINCIPALS (612) 881-2455�f PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDWARD H. SUNOE. R.L.S.. PRESIDENT - FAX 612/888-9526
JOHN K. BARNES. R.L.S.. SR. VICE PRES. LAND SURVEYING
MARK S. HANSON, R.L.S., SR. VICE PRES. LAND TITLE SURVEYS
SCOTT J. SOUKUP. R.L.S., VICE PRES. CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING
July 12, 1997 C.A.D. SERVICES
MCDONALDS CORPORATION
1650 W. 82"d Street- Suite 900
Bloomington, MN 55431
Attention: Mr. Cray Meyer
Re: 97-102 (McDonalds Site Located at 2201 Highway 10 —Moundsview, MN)
Dear Gary:
On Friday, July 11, 1997, one of our survey crews visited the site to measure the distance from
the McDonalds property to Rice Creek.
III
The distance from the most southerly property corner to the closest edge of Rice Creek is 487
feet.
Please give me a call at any time if we can be of further assistance. Thanks, again, for the
opportunity to be of service.
Yours truly,
SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, INC.
,g.
/John K. Barnes, R.L.S.
`/ Sr. Vice President
IrTOTT[]
- .DC7
JKB/mj w/letter/97-102
�By
III
,,,,,I4147
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 527-97 •
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
FOR McDONALDS,LOCATED AT 2201 HIGHWAY 10;
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. 500-97
WHEREAS, Gary Meyer, representing McDonalds, has applied for a development review
to replace the existing McDonalds Restaurant with a similarly sized building at 2201 Highway 10 ,
property zoned B-3, Highway Business District, legally described as follows:
Lot 1, Block 3, Programmed Land First Addition,
County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota
WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a
development review be conducted for this and similar projects; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding
this development review request: •
1. Planning Application
2. Zoning Map
3. Revised Plans, dated 8/14/97
4. Memo from Rocky Keehn, City Engineer, dated 8/7/97
5. Memo from Mark Bishop,Fire Marshal, dated 8/7/97
6. Letter from Sunde Land Surveying, Inc., dated 7/12/97
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has made findings that the application from Gary
Meyer, representing McDonalds, meets the dimensional requirements as stated below:
Required Provided Met/Not Met
Building Height: s 45 feet 17 feet Met
Building Setbacks:
Front (Highway 10): 30 feet 50 Feet Met
Front (Program Ave.): 30 Feet 65 Feet Met
West Side: 10 Feet 50 Feet Met
East Side: 10 Feet 122 Feet Met
Rear: 20 feet 80 Feet Met.
Parking Lot Setbacks:
Front (Highway 10): 30 Feet 30 Feet Met
Front (Program Ave.): 30 Feet 30 Feet Met
East Side: 5 Feet 7.5 Feet Met •
West Side: 5 Feet 7.0 Feet Met
• Rear: 5 Feet 10 Feet Met
s
Planning Commission Resolution 527-97
• McDonalds Development Review
August 20, 1997
Page 2
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does hereby find that the landscape plan as
proposed satisfies the requirements of the Municipal Code; and,
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed the drainage plan for this site and has found
it acceptable and consistent with the Master Drainage Plan previously approved by the City
Council and Rice Creek Watershed District; and,
WHEREAS, the City Fire Marshal has reviewed the site plans and finds the layout meets
Fire Department requirements for emergency vehicle access; and,
WHEREAS, the approximately 80 square feet of signage indicated on the site plans is
within the 100 square feet allowed by the Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Planning Commission
does hereby recommend to the City Council that the development review for the McDonalds
reconstruction project located at 2201 Highway 10 as presented by Gary Meyer be approved
subject to the following contingencies:
• 1. Prior ta:action by the City Council on this development review, the applicant shall
identify the locations of any building mounted lighting and submit photometric
.analysis for the site.
2. Prior to obtaining building permits for this project, the applicant shall enter into a
development contract with the City as required by Section 1006.06, Subd. 4 of the
Municipal Code which sets forth all of the conditions, terms, requirements,
agreements, guarantees and plans for the orderly development of the site.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward
this resolution to the'City Council prior to approval of the minutes.
Adopted this 29th day of August, 1997.
Jerry Peterson, Chairperson
AlLEST:
James Ericson, Planning Associate
IP (SEAL)
N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASEs1500.971 ACdtDONS.RES
Item No. 1l
Staff Report No. 97-c2/9. c.
Meeting Date 8-25-97
• Type of Business CB
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA: Consent Agenda; CB:Council Business
Mounds View City Council
Staff Report
To: Mounds View City Council
From: Cathy Bennett, Director of Economic Development
Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution Approving the Lease Agreement Between the
City of Mounds View and Independent School District No. 621 and
Authorizing the Mayor and Clerk-Administrator to Execute the Lease on
Behalf of the City
Date of Report: August 21, 1997
Attached is a resolution that approves the lease agreement between the City and Community
Education for leased space in the Community Center. The lease was approved by the Independent
School District No. 621 Board on August 12th. The resolution is modeled after the Children's Home
Society's whereby the Council is approving the lease as presented and authorizing the Mayor and
• Clerk-Administrator to execute the lease. The lease was presented to the Council in Final Draft form
at the August work session with no modifications.
Recommendation:
Staff if recommending approval of Resolution No. 5150 approving the lease with Community
Education and authorizing the Mayor and Clerk-Administrator to execute the agreement.
0
RESOLUTION NO. 5150 •
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
MOUNDS VIEW AND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 621 AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR AND CLERK-ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE THE LEASE ON BEHALF
OF THE CITY
WHEREAS, the City Council("Council") of the City of Mounds View("City") has •
previously authorized City staff to enter into negotiations with the Independent School District
No. 621 ("School District")to develop the terms of a lease ("Lease") under which School
District would lease space from the City in a certain portion of the City's newly developed
Mounds View Community Center("Leased Premises"); and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk-Administrator has been negotiating with School District over
the past several months regarding the terms of the Lease; and
WHEREAS, the City and School District have reached an agreement regarding the terms
of the Lease which call for School District to lease the Leased Premises from the City for
renewable five year terms at a base rent of approximately$51,000 per year being paid to the City ill
with inflation adjustments each year; and
WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the terms of the proposed Lease as recommended
by the City Clerk-Administrator.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council hereby approved the terms of
the proposed Lease between the City and School District; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City
Clerk-Administrator to execute the Lease with School District on behalf of the City.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota this 25th day of August,
1997.
Duane McCarty, Mayor
ATTEST:
•
Charles S. Whiting, Clerk-Administrator
Execution Copy
• LEASE
THIS INDENTURE made and entered into as of this day of ,
1997, by and between the City of Mounds View, Minnesota whose address is 2401
Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 (hereinafter referred to as "Landlord") and
Independent School District No. 621, a public corporation under the laws of Minnesota,
whose address is 2959 North Hamline Ave., St. Paul, MN 55113 (hereinafter referred to
as "Tenant").
WITNESSETH:
1. DEMISED PREMISES. In consideration of the rents, covenants and
agreements herein reserved and contained on the part of Tenant to be performed, Landlord
does hereby lease to Tenant that portion of the building formerly known as the Bel Rae
Ballroom located at 5394 Edgewood Drive, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 (the
"Building") consisting of that portion of the Building described on Exhibit A attached
hereto and consisting of approximately 5,100 square feet (hereinafter referred to as the
"Demised Premises").
2. TERM. The term of this Lease and Tenant's obligation to pay rent
hereunder shall commence on September 1, 1998 (the "Commencement Date") and shall
• continue until and the term of the Lease shall expire on January 31, 2003. In addition,
Tenant shall have two (2) successive options of five (5) years each exercisable by written
notice by Tenant to Landlord at least three (3) months prior to expiration of the then-
current term and upon such exercise thereof this lease shall be extended for said term on
all the same terms and conditions contained therein (except said option); provided that the
Base Rent during each extension term shall be increased (but not decreased) by the
increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) from the date hereof. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained herein, either Landlord or Tenant may terminate this
Lease at any time upon at least ninety (90) days prior written notice in which event this
Lease shall become null and void and neither party shall have any further liability
hereunder except for obligations for rent accruing prior thereto; provided that in the event
that Tenant shall exercise the foregoing right of termination, Tenant shall pay to Landlord
the unamortized portion of the cost of Landlord's Improvements set forth on Exhibit B
attached hereto, which cost shall be amortized over the 60-month initial term of this Lease
without interest, which amount shall be due no later than the date of lease termination.
3. RENT. During the term hereof Tenant agrees to pay as gross base rent (the
"Base Rent") to Landlord at 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112, or at such
other place as the Landlord may from time to time designate in writing, in advance in
twelve equal monthly installments on or before the first day of each month during the
• term hereof the sum calculated on an annual basis equal to Ten and no/100 Dollars
($10.00) times the square footage in the Demised Premises; provided that with respect to
LMW117449 1
MU205-1 1
any partial month or year, Base Rent shall be adjusted accordingly; provided further,
however, that on each anniversary of the Commencement Date the rate per square foot •
shall be increased (but not decreased) by the increase in the Consumer Price Index, or
successor index("CPI") from the CPI at the Commencement Date to the CPI immediately
prior to such anniversary; provided, further that in no event shall such increase in the rate
per square foot from one year to the next foot exceed five percent (5%).
4. GROSS LEASE; NO ADDITIONAL RENT. Except for the cost of
telephone service, notwithstanding any contrary provision contained in this Lease, this
Lease shall be deemed a "gross" lease, Landlord shall be responsible for the supply of
electricity, natural gas, water, sanitary sewer, daily vacuuming, and trash collection and
snow removal for the Demised Premises, and Landlord (and not Tenant) shall be
responsible for any other monetary obligations associated with ownership or operation of
the Demised Premises.
5. TENANT'S USE. During the term of this Lease, the Demised Premises
shall be used solely for the purpose of general educational purposes. Tenant shall not
assign this Lease or sublease the Demised Premises in whole or in part without Landlord's
prior written approval.
6. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS. Landlord shall be responsible for
repairs and maintenance of the Demised Premises, i.e., roof, glass and mechanical •
equipment. Tenant shall be responsible for damages caused by Tenant, its clients or
invitees.
7. SURRENDER OF PREMISES. At the expiration or termination of this
Lease, Tenant shall surrender the Demised Premises in the same condition as existed on
the commencement date of this Lease, ordinary wear and tear excepted. All fixtures
which have become attached shall be part of the Demised Premises, except trade fixtures.
8. LANDLORD IMPROVEMENTS. Landlord shall cause to be constructed
the improvements on the Demised Premises as set forth in Exhibit B (Landlord Work)
attached hereto. Without limiting the foregoing, Landlord shall cause the Demised
Premises to contain two (2) separate, secure entrances. Tenant shall not construct any
improvements in the Demised Premises or alter the Demised Premises without Landlord's
prior written consent.
9. TENANT'S LIABILITY INSURANCE. Tenant shall during the entire term
hereof keep in full force and effect a policy of public liability and property damage
insurance with respect to the Demised Premises, and the business operated by Tenant and
any sublessees with respect to the Demised Premises, in which the limits of public liability
shall not be less than $1,000,000 per person and $1,000,000 per accident and in which
the property damage liability shall not be less than $500,000. The policy shall name
LMW117449
Moa05-1
• Landlord as additional insured and shall contain clauses that losses shall be payable
notwithstanding any act or negligence of the insured which might otherwise result in
forfeiture of said insurance, and that the insurer will not cancel or change the insurance
without first giving the Landlord thirty (30) days prior written notice.
10. COVENANT OF QUIET ENJOYMENT. Tenant, subject to the terms and
provisions of this Lease, on payment of the rent and observing, keeping and performing
all of the terms and provisions of this Lease on its part to be observed, kept and
performed, shall lawfully, peaceably and quietly have, hold occupy and enjoy the Demised
Premises during the term hereof without hindrance or objection by any persons lawfully
claiming under Landlord.
11. NOTICES. Any notice which is required under this Lease shall be deemed
"given" upon hand delivery or three (3) days after prepaid posting in the U. S. Mail
whichever shall first occur. Notice shall be addressed to the addresses listed at the
beginning of this Lease or to any other address as shall be designated by written notice.
12. SHARED SPACE. Tenant shall have rights regarding shared space located
in the Building at the then-going operational-fee-based rate payable to Landlord, provided
that any such use by Tenant shall be subject to events or uses of such shared space
• scheduled by Landlord prior to Tenant's written notification to Landlord of Tenant's
desire to use said space. In addition, Landlord shall have the right, without any reduction
in the rent to be paid hereunder, to use the two (2) conference rooms located in the
Demised Premises and as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto at the then-going
operational-fee-based rate payable to Tenant, provided that any such use by Landlord shall
be subject to events or uses of conference rooms scheduled by Tenant prior to Landlord's
written notification to Tenant of Landlord's desire to use said space.
•
LMW117449
Mu205-1 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have affixed their signatures the day
and year first above written. •
LANDLORD: THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
BY:
ITS: Mayor
BY:
ITS: City Clerk-Administrator
TENANT: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
NO. 621
BY:
ITS: •
•
LMW117449
MQ205-1 4
i
EXHIBIT A
• DEMISED PREMISES
•
VALKVAY
•
JA STORAGE STORAGE 't
231 S.F. 231 S.F.ce MD
VOMENliirai I
12S S.F. ) MEN
o _
o
2 is r} ai , 'S2 S.F. _ -
O _ X11
UDo 0 a' rAr
CO Ro 31
FFICE ANO
0 ti
0 .-210FIcE S.F. MULTI-PURPOSE COflEERENCt:, 0 M
�! 2�0 S.F. I1l12yy9� u�
0 r
.:rs\
0 Ct O0 0 0 � �
< 4 ■ i ; � •
4 =4
CORRIDOR
Won STORAGE I C FE . EURO4 M �I
• ■ �¢r i32 S.F. I ; oN �� p U 111
•
si W 7-Ti
_- - ---� L11 ' CHANGE
TOILET
SS S.F.
CORRIDOR —12
STORAGE I S'T'OSAP. a I L DRAGS
• I
.f • CHI L0ZFrn 1CALZON
•ti• _ 933 S.F. •
/ . . PARENT EDUCATION
CLASSROOM I CLASSROOM I CLASSROOM 510 S.F. .
300 S.F. 300 S.F. . 300 S.F. I
I Mil
I
I i
�. ) ' ).-.....--4 F—' i F--moi } 4
I- `LF L
•
LMN117449
MD205-1 5
EXHIBIT B
Construction/Renovation Costs
Mounds View School District 621 Community Education
Renovation Costs:
Storage/Corridor/Office (621) 900 sq.ft. x $55/sq.ft. = $49,500.00
Toilets (MV) 200 sq.ft. x $120/sq.ft. = $24,000.00
New Construction:
Interior Space -new(621) 4200 sq.ft. x $63.10/sq.ft= $265,020.00
Exterior Space - new(MV) 4200 sq.ft. x $31.90/sq.ft.= $133,139.00
Design Contingency:
(621) $6,290.40
(MV) $4,000.60
TOTAL $481,950.00
Leasehold Improvement Costs:
(621) $320,810.40
(MV) $161,139.60
•
INFORMATION
ONLY ..„.
MANAGEMENT MEETING MINUTES
Tuesday, August 19, 1997, 10:00 AM
I. Call to Order
Meeting was called to order at 10 a.m. Present: Whiting, Ulrich, Kessel, Saarion,Jim Ericson,
Hammerschmidt,Bennett,Zikmund left at 10:50 a.m. Absent: Ramacher, Sanchez
II. Approval of the August 12 minutes were deferred to the August 26 meeting.
M. Department Reports -Zikmund reported the Bel Rae was given temporary approval
pending further completion of the work there, 2125 Belle Lane was being reminded of safety
violations that needed correcting, and Scotland Green is in need of a corridor smoke detection
system. Also, a proposal for the three fire communities to change the fire Board of Appeals from
the city councils to the Fire Department Board of Directors will'be coming to the City Council on
the September 2 work session. He also gave phone numbers for Sanchez to call regarding the
mold growing in the City Hall basement. Bennett updated the community center project. DPW
will take down the old Bel Rae sign, Hammerschmidt will have golf course part timers available
for painting the outside of the community center. Saarion reported articles of incorporation have
been submitted for the Festival Committee, meaning the City no longer has to be their fiscal agent,
and fall programming is starting. Softballs hitting cars and buildings Greenfield was discussed,
issue to be on the Council September 2 work session. Ulrich reported the chip sealing is done, a
0 new striper was purchased and he will be doing HVAC proposal interviews. Kessel reported
requesting auditing rfp's, and is currently reviewing financial software packages. Ericson has
filed an administrative search warrant on the Lodmill property through the attorneys, and SRF is
helping on the planning case load. Whiting reported on the TOLD Development proposal for the
Eastwood Road property and the happenings of the previous night's Council meeting. He asked
to have the Planning Commission agendas scrolled on Channel 16 due to the interest in this
process.
IV. Unfinished Business - Whiting reported on the top two candidates for the Community
Development Director position and that he will advise the Council on a selection next Monday
night. The top two candidates are Rick Jopke from Roseville and Coralee Fox from Jordan. Both
appear to bring different strengths, and more background needs to be done. He also reviewed the
Council's budget discussion. He noted that the problems in balancing the 1998 budget are
threefold, first, the exhaustion of the Silver Lake Woods road fund in 1996 basically transferred
the City's street maintenance costs to the general fund, two, the consideration of the elimination
the franchise fee without replacement revenues squeezes the City hard, and three, levy limitations
allow the City to recoup about a third of the franchise fee. Despite the reduction of about 2 V2
positions, this still places a squeeze on the City's operations.
VI. Adjournment - There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 12:15 p.m.
Next meeting is August 26.
• Respectfully submitted,
Chuck Whiting, Acting Secretary
I
•
MEMO
IN
.;,..
Or
To: Mayor and City Council 0N Ly i�
From: Michael Ulrich 4-1
Subject: Spring Lake Road Reconstruction
Date: August 21, 1997
The second informational meeting for the reconstruction of Spring Lake Road was held on
August 19, 1997. I thought I would provide Council with a brief summary of the two meetings,
in case you receive any questions from residents.
At the first meeting, staff received a petition from the residents merely to resurface the street and
not construct a sidewalk. Staff presented the trailways plan and informed the residents that the
decision not to construct the walk would be that of Council, not staff. Also presented were the
requirements of State Aid for the street design. Again, these would be 26 feet with no parking, 32
feet with parking on one side and 38 feet with parking on both sides.
0 Other than the petition, a consensus on the street width was not reached. Conversation between
street width and sidewalks somewhat limited the decision of the residents. Staff also informed
the residents that the sanitary sewer around the lake would be replaced due to some pipe and
joint deficiencies and water main would be installed from Spring Lake Road to Pleasantview on
County Rd. I. The latter would provide City water to those residents.
. At the second meeting, estimated assessments were given on all of the improvements. Since the
City has a minimum street width set at 30 feet and assessment policy of assessing 50% of a 30
foot street, the assessment was based on this width. The actual street design width was 32 feet, to
allow parking on one side. This design was chosen only to provide estimated improvement costs -
and assessment. The road may be designed and built at a different width.
Barbara Haake volunteered to coordinate a neighborhood survey to determine what the majority
of the residents of the street would like included in the project. She will be presenting the results
at the September 22, 1997 Council meeting. I agree with this approach, particularly headed by a
resident, and thanked her for her efforts. The following are some of the concerns voiced by the
residents at both meetings:
1. No sidewalk/trailway construction
2. Don't widen the street
3. They don't like the assessment policy
II 4. They feel that the Co. Turnback dollars and State Aid should be utilized to lower their
assessment.
5. Concerns with the right of way issues on County I and St. Paul Water
6. Possible petition to kill the project.
Mayor and City Council
Page 2
August 21, 1997
I have include the following with this memo:
a. Assessment policy
b. Petition
c. Estimated project cost
d. Estimated assessment
If you have any questions on any of these items, or receive questions from residents, please feel
free to call me.
•
41/0 ORDINANCE NO. 600
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 202 , SECTION 202 . 09 OF THE
MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE V.IEW- ENTITLED "PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS"
The City of Mounds View ordains :
SECTION I Chapter 202 . 09 , Subd 2 of the Mounds View
Municipal Code is amended to read:
Subd.2 Improvement Type and Apportionment of Cost:
a. Street Reconstruction Including Curb and Gutter.
The cost of street reconstruction shall be recovered by
the adjusted front footage method. The front footage
rate shall be determined by dividing the project cost by
the total number of adjusted front feet in the project
4110area x the individual adjusted front footage x one-half
•
(l,4) . The assessments per adjusted front foot may vary
depending on the underlying zoning of a parcel.
Assessments for residential properties which are on
collector or arterial streets shall be adjusted so that
the amount of the assessment shall be the same as if the
project were constructed to residential street standards .
The remaining cost shall be recovered by means of the
general ad valorem property tax paid by the entire
• community or by other funds that may become available to
the City for infrastructure cost recovery.
b. Street Resurfacing. Street resurfacing is commonly
known and referred to as street overlaying whereby a new
bed of road material such as bituminous is installed over
an existing paved road to a specific thickness .
Assessments shall be determined by the adjusted front
footage method.
c . Sidewalk. Sidewalk improvements may be done in
conjunction with a street reconstruction or as a separate
project . In any event, cost of sidewalk improvements
shall be recovered by means of the general ad valorem
4110
property tax paid by the entire community or by other
funds that may become available to the City for
infrastructure cost recovery.
d. Sealcoating. Sealcoating, patching and cracksealing
are considered general maintenance activities and the •
expenses of such acts will be paid for by ad valorem
property tax or any other funds available to the City at
that time .
e. Sanitary Sewer and Water Mains . Repair and
replacement of sewer or water mains is usually done in
conjunction with a street reconstruction project and the
cost of this work should.be included as part of the total
major street project cost and should also be considered
to be included in the rate assessed for street
reconstruction. If it is determined that the repair and
replacement work results in a greater benefit to some
properties and not to others, the Council should consider
establishing a different assessment rate based on the
benefits received.
f . Sanitary Sewer and Water Trunk Improvements . Trunk
sewer and water mains are usually designed to carry
larger volumes of flow than are necessary within an
immediate property area in order to serve additional
properties beyond the area of their immediate placement .
Therefore, 100 percent (100%) of the cost of trunk
improvements will be assessed on a unit basis. to all4111
properties within a district deemed to be benefitted from
the trunk improvements .
g. Sewer and Water Services . Individual sewer and
water services benefit only the properties they serve and
100 percent (100%) of their cost shall be assessed to the
property for which they are installed.
h. Drainage Improvements . Storm drainage and
ponding/basin systems are usually constructed .to serve a
specific drainage or "watershed" district. These drainage
districts have trunk lines, which are large diameter
pipes that transport large volumes of water from one or
more drainage districts . Property within drainage
districts that would receive benefit from a trunk storm
sewer, would be assessed a unit amount of $400 . 00 per lot •
for a single family residential lot. This amount would be
determined and adjusted annually by resolution using the
Engineering News Record (ENR) . Multifamily hot1 : ' -
that exceed 1/3 acre would be assessed basea ,Jn
number of acres, multiplied by the unit cost of $1, 200 .00
per acre. Commercial / Industrial property would be
assessed based on the number of acres that are determined
to benefit from the trunk line multiplied by the unit4110
cost of $1, 200 . 00 per acre to a maximum amount of three
4110
(3 ) acres or $3 , 600 . 00 . The remaining cost will be paid
for by the Surface Water Utility and/or by an ad valorem
property tax paid by the entire community or by other
funds that may become available to the City for
infrastructure cost recovery. Should a project be
initiated on a particular street that requires storm
sewer laterals which would be connected to the trunk
lines, the Surface Water Utility would fund these
expenses .
I . Special Conditions . Special consideration shall be
given to the "age" of a street or utility system when
determining the proportion of cost to be assessed to
benefitted properties . If it is necessary to reconstruct
or resurface a street or perform major repair/replacement
work on sewer and water utilities, before a reasonable
amount of time (10 to 12 years for resurfacing, 12 to 17
years for partial reconstruction and 17 to 25 years for
total reconstruction) the assessment shall be calculated
on a pro-rated basis . The remaining cost shall be
recovered by means of the general ad valorem property tax
paid by the entire community or by other funds that may
4110 become available to the City for infrastructure cost
recovery. •
Section II. Chapter 202 . 09 Subd 3 of the Mounds View Municipal
Code is amended to Read: -
Subd. 3 METHODS OF ASSESSMENT
a. The nature of an improvement determines the method
of assessment. The objective is to choose an assessment
method which will arrive at a reasonable, fair and
equitable assessment which will be uniform upon the same
class of property within the assessed area. The most
frequently recognized assessment methods are: the unit
assessment, the front footage assessment and the area
assessment. Depending upon the individual project, any
one or a combination of these methods may be utilized to
arrive at an appropriate cost distribution. City staff
will consider all methods and weigh their applicability
to the project and present a recommendation to the City
Council in the form of a mock assessment roll (or rolls) .
A description of each assessment and its corresponding
policy application is presented. A separate section
(Section III) will identify the appropriate matchup of
method with a specific type of project and analyze why
41/0
each is generally used.
The purpose of assessment formulas is to allocate
assessed costs among benefitted properties , the formula
should result in a allocation of assessments which is
reasonably related to the benefit received. Any one
predetermined formula will not be appropriate in all
cases because of circumstances unique to the relationship
between the specific project and the specific properties
benefitted. When considering an assessment method or
formula for any given project, it may be necessary to
combine assessment methods or to modify the methods
described below. Therefore, the following description of
methods of assessments should be regarded as guidelines,
which may not be appropriate in all cases .
b. Unit Assessment. A unit assessment shall be derived
by dividing the total project cost by the number of
- Residential Equivalent Density (RED) units in the project
area. A RED unit is defined as a single family
residential unit. All platted and unplatted property will
assigned RED unit values equivalent to the underlying
zoning. When the existing land use is less than the
highest and best permitted use, the Council may consider
the current use as well as the full potential of land use
in determining the appropriate number of RED units .
• Otherwise, the following RED chart will apply on a per
unit basis, subject to adjustment by the Council for any
inequities : 4110
Single Family 1 . 00 RED
Duplex 1 . 00 RED
Condominium 0 . 80' RED
Multifamily (3 units or more) 0 . 80 RED
Townhouse 0 . 80 RED
Commercial 2 . 00 Units
Industrial 2 . 00 Units
The unit approach has proven to be the best method in
those instances whereby the improvement largely benefits
everyone to the same degree and the cost of the
improvement is not generally affected by parcel size.
c . Area Assessment. The assessable area shall be
expressed in terms of the number of acres or the number
of square feet subject to assessment. When determining
the assessable area, the following considerations will be
given:
(1) Ponding Assessment Consideration. Lakes, ponds
and swamps may be considered a part of the assessable
area of a parcel .
410
(2) Road Right-of-Way Assessment Consideration. Up to
4110 20 percent (20%) of the gross acreage may be deducted for
street right-of-way purposes within unpiatted parcels of
five acres or more depending upon the parcel
configuration and is only applicable to single family
residential use. Parcels of less than five acres may not
qualify and may be assessed full acreage. The reason for
this size restriction is that, in most instances, parcels
of less than five acres cannot support an internal public
road system. '
(3 ) Park Dedication Assessment Consideration. When
park land is dedicated as part of a residential
development, as required by Subdivisions Code - Chapter
1204 . 02 , the developer shall not be assessed an acreage
charge on the portion of land dedicated.
d. Front Footage Assessment. The actual physical
dimensions of a parcel abutting an improvement (ie. ,
street, sewer, water, etc. ) will generally not be
construed as the frontage utilized to calculate the
assessment for a particular parcel. Rather, an "adjusted
front footage" will be determined. The purpose of this
41/0 method is to equalize assessment calculations for lots of
similar size. Individual parcels by their very nature
differ considerably in shape and area. The following
procedures will apply when calculating adjusted front
footage. The selection of the appropriate procedures will
be determined by the specific configuration of the
parcel . All measurements will be scaled from available
plat and section maps and will be rounded down to the
nearest i foot dimension with any excess fraction
deleted.
e. Categorical type descriptions are as follows :
Standard Lots
Rectangular Variation Lots
Triangular Lots
Cul-de-sac Lots
Curved Lots
Irregularly Shaped Lots
Corner Lots
Flag Lots
Double Frontage Lots
4110 The ultimate objective of these procedures is to arrive
at a fair and equitable distribution of cost whereby
consideration is given to lot size and parcels are
comparably assessed.
•
I. Standard Lots. In this instance, the adjusted front footage for rectangular
i
lots will be the actual front footage of the lot. The frontage measured shall
be the lot width at the front lot line.
MAIN AVE. .
•
so' av• Adj. Front Footage
EXAMPLES
Lot A-50'
- I_ot 0-90'
2. Rectangular Variation Lots. For a lot which is approximately rectangular
arid uniform in shape, the adjusted front footage is computed by averaging
the front and back sides of the lot. This method is used only where the
divergence between front and rear lot lines is 20 feet or less.
MA ►N A'JE. Adj. Front Footage- •
90' 70' 1. EXAMPLES
Lot.A-90'1110 = 100'
A. 2
•
Lot B-70 : 80 = 75'.
2
tic- so'
3. Triangular Lots. Far a triangular shaped lot, the adjusted front footage is
computed by averaging the front and back lot lines. The measurement at
the back lot fine shall not exceed a maximum distance in depth of 150 feet.
1M/1 4 I 'U A V P' • Adj. Front Footage
icc ``'�' \ I'� / EXAMPLES
Lot A-10U ; 40 = 70'
ISO'
A \ C i2
Lot B-40 : 130 = 85'
. \ 2
I V Lot C-120 0 = 60' 0
\ 2
\
I
.. •
4. Cul-de-Sac Lots. The adjusted front footage for those lots that exist on cul-
de-sacs will be calculated at the midsection of the lot at the most
reasonably defined and determinable position. This line will be computed
by connecting the midpoints of tiie two side lot lines. Or, if the lots are
similar in nature and configuration, a common lot width, such as the
standard set back of 30' may be assigned based upon an evaluation of.
typical lots within the subdivision.
Adj. f=ront Footage
• iV i A I N CIRCLE - --- EXAMPLES
- 1 LotA- 75'
i, C Lot B-110'�.� �` Lot C- 80'
73-•
• i io -'i
A p
•
5. Curved Lots. In certain situations such as those where lots are located
along meandering trail system streets, read patterns create curvilineal
frontages. In such Instances, the adjusted front footage will be the width
of the lot measured at the midpoint of the shortest side lot line.
ti
L A i ".,. .
/ �. Adj. Front Footage
�-,. r- �. EXAMPLES
Lot A- 70'
/ __ r.10 - - Lot B- 90'
I __- __- \ Lot C-150'
_r,, i
•
1
11111
6. Irregularly Shaped Lots. In many cases, uriplatted parcels that are legally
described by a metes and bounds description are Irregular and odd
shaped. The adjusted front footage will be calculated by measuring the
lot width at the 30 foot building setback line.
( IVI A I N A V E . Adj. Front Footage
-�- EXAMPLES
rry ���''-• I.L. �.['
- - - - - - - -- - - LotA-115'
Lot B-140'
A 8 (J Lot C-125'
•
7. Corner Lots •
a) On a corner lot, 100 percent (100%) of the adjusted front footage
of the short side will be assessed'and 25 percent (25%) of the adjusted
front footage of the long side will be assessed for improvements
benefitting the respective sides. The length of the property sides and not
the orientation of the principal building shall determine adjusted front
footage in this case. A series of.lots (two or more) under common
ownership shall be considered as one parcel or lot for determining which
is the short or long side of a property. However, this shall only apply to
series of lots on which only one principal building is situated.
Adj. Front Footage
• EXAMPLES
Lot A-Side 1 = 43.75'
Side 2 = 95'
Lot.B-Side 1 = 87.5'
• Side 2 = 125' .
� c
i^
•
S - � 2)
1V1A ISM AV .
. •
b) . General Commercial Zoned Corner Lots. i
gr�intcd booauso of tho higher ir-therer-+t i . y value ac eeieted-witJ44
irriprovod traffic frontage and greater uicibilily along business district
nnd-inciuckiai park intorcoctionc. 't he adjusted front footage shall be the
entire frontage.r cast*edd aleng- Elle se l.ifie o r-H i keg UN-e beileiny
ertvclopo.
Adj. Front Footage
/ [EXAMPLES
/
Lot -� '�;7s
i ---- .. L.ot S-3)O' 300 0
�i I
A, ' •
Rot
I
l= I ,
317
ins' ,LI ARIh\I Sao '
. t:E.
• 1 I ..
.
- 8. Flag Lots. Properties which utilize a narrow private easement or
maintain ownership of access to their property exceeding a minimum
length of 125 feet, thereby having a small frontage on a street, will be
assigned an adjusted front footage of 75 feet. This,dimension is consistent
with the subdivision ordinance which prescribes such length as the
minimum lot frontage along a public roadway. The adjusted front footage
for flag lots whose driveway access is under 125 feet will be measured at
the building setback line from the access terminus.
Adj. Front Footage
EXAMPLES
_ Lot A-75'
t l.411`I AVE.. 1.1.1LOt I3'90'
I.>1
• •
•
J. Double Frontage Lots. If a parcel, other than a corner lot, comprises
frontage on two streets and is eligible for subdivision, then an adjusted
front footage assessment will be charged along each street. For double
frontage lots lacking the necessary depth for subdivision, only a single
adjusted front footage will be computed. The frontage with driveway
access to front of house, shall be assessed.
•
Adj. Front Footage
NI A I N A'•J E. lvri\ IN i V!E!E EXAMPLES
II . +3 Lot A-220'
Lot B- f30'
L.)
i •� •
I!0�
•
•
•
4110
•
SECTION III. This ordinance is effective thirty
days after its publication.
Introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View
on April 28, 1997 .
Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View
this 12 day of May, 1997 .
ATTEST: •
MAYOR
(SEAL)
4111 ADMINISTRATOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
SPRING LAKE RD./CO. RD I IMPROVEMENTS
SEI-I FILE A-MOUND9706 •
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT COST
32' STREET 30' STREET 38' STREET
SANITARY SEWER LATERAL. 40,078.50 40,078.50 40,078.50
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 4,125.00 4,125.00 4,125.00
WATER LATERAL 23,096.98 23,096.98 23,096.98
WATER SERVICE 2,035.00 2,035.00 2,035.00
TRAIUSIDEWALK 137,132.19 137,132.19 137,132.19
STREET 1,120,261.31 1,082,698.03 1,233,214.47
STORM SEWER SYSTEM 123,263.25 123,263.25 123,263.25
STORM SEWER TREATMENT TO BE DETERMINED
TOTAL $1,449,992.23 $1,412,428.95 $1,562,945.39
s
•
PAGE NO. 1 A-MOUND9706
f .
0UNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
RING LAKE RD./CO. RD. I IMPROVEMENTS
SEH FILE A-MOUND9706
TOTAL EST. CITY
PROJECT COST ASSESSMENTS PARTICIPATION
STREET 1,120,261.31 541,353.93 578,907.38
171,600.00
STORM SEWER PIPE 123,263.25 (48,336.75)
TO BE TO BE
STORM SEWER TREATMENT DETERMINED ($400/LOT) DET RM NED
TRAIL/SIDEWALK 137,132.19 0.00 137,132.19
WATER MAIN LATERAL 23,096.98 11,548.48 11,548.50
WATER SERVICE 2,035.00 2,035.00 0.00
NITARY SEWER LATERAL 40,078.50 10,019.60 30,058.90
N. SEWER SERVICE 4,125.00 4,125.00 0.00
TOTALS 1,449,992.23 740,682.01 709,310.22
• .
PAGE NO. 1 A-MOUND9706
1
MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
SPRING LAKE ROAD/CO. RD. I IMPROVEMENTS 1111
ASSESSMENT BASIS
SEH FILE A-MOUND9706
SANITARY SEWER LATERAL
ASSESSMENT
ESTIMATED LATERALPROJECT COST $44,203.50
LESS SANITARY SERVICES (4,125.00)
TOTAL SAN. SEWER LATERAL COST $40,078.50
CITY PARTICIPATION (1/2 PROJECT) (20,039.25)
•
- - 77P 1 O ASSESS $20,039.25
CITY PART. (ONE SIDE ASSESS) (10,019.63)
AMOUNT TO ASSESS. $10,019.62
ASSESSABLE UNITS 5 LOTS
RATE PER LOT $2,003.92 /LOT
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ASSESSMENT $4,125.00
EST. SERVICE PROJECT COST •
ASSESSABLE UNITS
5 LOTS
RATE PER LOT $825.00 /LOT
WATER LATERAL ASSESSMENT
EST. WATER LATERAL PROJECT COST $25,131.98
LESS WATER SERVICES (2,035.00)
•
TOTAL WATER LATERAL COST $23,096.98
CITY PART. (ONE SIDE ASSESS) (11,548.49)
AMOUNT TO ASSESS. $11,548.49
ASSESSABLE UNITS
4 LOTS
RATE PER LOT $2,887.12 /LOT
• S
A-MOUND9706
PAGE NO. 1
I : ., 1 U I.I I:ui
NDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
ING LAKE ROAD/CO. RD. I IMPROVEMENTS
ASSESSMENT BASIS
SEH FILE A-MOUND9706
WATER SERVICE ASSESSMENT
EST. SERVICE PROJECT COST $2,035.00
ASSESSABLE UNITS 4 LOTS
RATE PER LOT $508.75 /LOT
STREET-ASSESSMENT
EST. PROJECT COST $1,257,393.50
LESS STREET REDUCTION TO 30 FEET (37,563.28)
LESS TRAIL COST (137,132.19)
BALANCE TO ASSESS $1,082,698.03
CITY PARTICIPATION (1/2) (541,349.02)
AMOUNT TO ASSESS $541,349.01
•ASSESSABLE UNITS 13,433.1 FF •
RATE PER FF $40.30 /FF
•
PAGE NO. 2 A-MOUND9706
.ive, the undersigned believe Spring Lake Road should be only resurfaced . We do NOT wish to have -
it widened nor do we see a need to have a sidewalk innstalled. Z.? - a l 15 _
. Lava._ ack
` � LQ.ki &.,9 . 1 %0 I I S
0
Na r�i
l Address ( } Phone
4 <
./v5- " se.uA 784-7/D 1
'56(/c7a4,1-
-41,-, LtAte-13-- -7y7L)6 `Sk kms
,e,,G ," -7 ,44. ems( 7`1-30a7,5lit---,,,,- 9.0-,/,..--.
73 O �j�'`�'
.- x .20
)2\cP 735os?r)�� 1-41. ., rd 7 z
7.& ,i-e_ e--7, /...‘, c , , ' --. ... i -7fS— zi6. .A.-c---
ri- o z)3 0 SP 2 i es— U - . 722- c'18-4. Qi t 2 0
,1, 7 ie dzelli 7GGd5./ ; ar lot-ke. Aie
7 43 Ihd14
1 ,: 0 r75- ( .d,k_ AO , A
- 3G 7
� �
08- S
I -
___ I- -
0 -1- ' 7(j ; 7 ' - r7
9.T
' ufo Ait 6c-ILef,,,La .L-7-a-Ciett- ,;f7-Z Atk:r
��t
9077
3 J 6 5,r' 1 �,4.K 7r.-- 7als^
I II -21,kik.j.-_ --W -S'-- ff/(41(
*et tJ Zs �–�4— 7'r65 spit-'-vZ4 e 40� -75 6 - 3 3 3 7
,...,;:rv, ,,t7,;-Z, AA q 3 .,1 S .1)=;71 1_1(..a-3is-l- ,, ff ��
v -ci e ' , 2 � OYt- �`k it22 ,,s7 –J /7�-
L
� , 305l-x a•
she undersigned believe Spring Lake Road should be only resurfaced . We do NOT wish to haw.O"ciened nor do we see a need to have a sidewalk innstalled.
cl, Qv c ,-v --,>v' C' ' ,`5 4..e R-6. 1 `k- t-( 31
/(a/U--iL ((..)./1-e.c.4."-t
Vame -J".' a -w-y/3 /
, Addres 24 Ce.0 Phone '')(6%-r 6 '7
, ,(17 _/ It li / / -1 73 3 7t-f-,,,i. 4-4/V - 7? Y.. - /cr . Y
5 41,,,e2e. 732-0 .4A,,,./' ',,--- , R-e.L. ? -8 (1- -- Liv54
4 ‹9, - II
3 Y. d -K2 c 7 rC-z.s9s----
x 1 - 7i1-(-4-4L-t _
'' PAN kra-g 1 SQA.`N L . 14 (kcc
.-14A : 14t.4.4-ie . td ` .eLf Spn L- ea 7Z O 1D
per, 6r11/0A4r70-1,,e _e
ce, /4"/ -7(v_L /7,5-
11L, T(1_,-cr 73� sem% vas r4-- -7O-cf�<.6 -7;
• \„.. ie.c," \ c'S\z,_,.1
\ _ \_ )--%c„„),( .--,v.21isc) _*),_N _In .
/ , „„Q.
,,,_4_,I
./:( ''. 72.7/1r Va Y/ " -- 7337-ri .:3,/,,L /4& 1 c - f t
C212-4.A.Z <5.°4(..-- 7 3 6 5- _A----7 1 k
__ 0 , 1��
75 -1 ti(g``'‘''ll lef'r
iact,1,, ,c,A eAdei.c _
ALIA:- ...ta.?/A'/ej
,-,-zg--rti 7-- L4a4--/-tn 44-ex-g-i-4 747'10 )4. -----j ,, 7 2 6 - 7 A 2
4211- /..)-74---/----7:' .7v 6 _.2. 1,4%,,j, ..ze/4/ Veit"— s-27 Kes
O7 cPf/A/6 ul / DtROL 7
,AL.e. W_sfnma_ 764 Sf 6 fl,g_ -7q----022447
'(//1. 4-' P. -;)
' Lk gc)- 7Tc2-6713S-
7S; Spy .7a0- 9'135
14 . 7(Zy 42A-t-^-a-- •
_ h-Or, ,
7 li ,i ' , / Kiia 7ciC -rier/-016. i.,c4,?_,. 750- 069
7S�- /567
A/ 8359 SPRIN(o
.�o/Av/4LA6�AfJ1 SEtJGl2So ���_� 7 ? 42x 7 3 6 5'17e2./,lG L/.- / 7 -
-14
,-7 kg,,,t4.,
4 44,,1 P,0,4,60/
Si�ti`Ee �2 7 �5/A7//vG e J 7
ha /SGL]/� � ` �� n�.
. / 7S - sal 7
7�5C �� -
V
wz -✓ 7675-- 5% '/ •
yats /a7",_ i`RJ 7FC - /OP
a�� m . . -7 55 �
Minnesota Community Policing Institute http://www.safenet.org/mcpi/mcpi.html
145 University Ave. W.
St. Paul. MN 55103-2044
• (612)281-1212
(800)925-1122
Fax(612)215-4101
To: City/County Administrators/Managers
Mayors 11 6 Li 11 h:16
County Commissioners
From: Sharon Klumpp, Associate Executive Director 0 NLY
Linda Miller, Director, MN Community Policing Institute
Re: PARTNERSHIPS FOR SAFE COMMUNITIES
Date: July 24, 1997
The Minnesota Community Policing Institute is pleased to announce an exciting community
policing symposium designed especially for teams of elected and appointed officials and their
community and police partners. This symposium will provide an opportunity for you to
participate as a team, to learn how to meet the challenges community policing presents in your
cities and counties and to learn about the promising practices that are already working in our
• communities. A typical team may be composed of a city or county administrator, the mayor,
your chief law enforcement executive, council member and a community leader.
The symposium will be held on September 25th& 26th at the Kelly Inn in St. Cloud. Enclosed
is an informational flyer that includes a registration form. Please complete the registration form
and return it as soon as possible as there is limited space. (Please duplicate the registration form
for multiple registrations.) A number of scholarships are available to community team
members who need assistance to attend the conference. A space is provided on the registration.
form to indicate a scholarship request.
For any additional programming questions please call Carol Schoeneck at Government Training
Services at (612) 222-7409 or Minnesota toll free (800) 652-9719. If you have questions or
would like information about community policing training or technical assistance, please call
MCPI at 612-281-1212 or in Minnesota, call 1-800-925-1122.
G n 4 77 l n� .7 74i.f ? (v G �v�c,)
cposium for Eff
• P S1 pct%
� IIIo,�
V
R�
( r O
O
Ter- Z.K ,--- .:.- ,3-
a) 1�
y»7 • _+ cD
• -.
'ate .`!^ ��
- 0
{l/lam '`" .'h- ,' ,;3._.;.
a +3 S,.
• 1,,
0
V V
,C\C\ZC°
k.
r -0 2 \oud,
sI X997 G
— St.
Sponsored by
Minnesota Community Policing Institute
a partnership of Minnesota community groups,
government and law enforcement organizations
Supported by Grant #94-DB-CX-0027,
II
awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance,
Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice
,/ Does your city use a community policing approach to PARTNERSHIPS FO
tackle the challenges of crime—and want to increase its A SYMPOSIUM FOR EFFECTIVE CC
•effectiveness?
✓ . . . .Or have you heard about the concept and want to Preliminary Sct-
know how it could work in your town?
,/ Would you like to broaden your partnership with the Thursday. September 25. 1997
community? Are you interested in working as a team to
explore the possibilities? 7:30 a.m.
REGISTRATION OPENS
,/ Have internal struggles at city hall (over resources, struc- 8:30
ture, turf, philosophy) made it difficult to take advantage PRE-CONFERENCE WORKSHOP: COP 101
of all that community policing has to offer? • The basics for those unfamiliar with
community policing or who want a refresher
✓ Would you like to generate common understanding and 11:00
commitment by elected officials, staff and community OPENING SESSION
"Community Policing: Today and Tomorrow"
leaders?
12:00 Noon
LUNCH/GENERAL SESSION
"Putting Community in Community Policing:Then this specia/interactive program is for your city!
Perspectives"
Symposium Panel (Elected Official, City
like° Manager, Police Chief, Community
!oily for Teams of: Representative)
ayors and Councilmembers 2:00 p.m.
• City Managers, Administrators, Clerks CONCURRENT SESSION I:
• Police Chiefs "Putting Community in Community Policing:
• Community Representatives A.Process"
Creating Creating & Sustaining Partnerships
B. Problem-Solving—Part I
Benefits of a Community TEAM C. Working Without A Net Lessons
• Create a shared understanding of community policing Learned—A Conversation
among your community's leaders D. Involving Diverse Cultures
• Bring less experienced team members "up to speed" 3:15
quickly and effectively BREAK
• Learn practical approaches for broadening your base of 3:30
support and number of active partners back in your CONCURRENT SESSIONS II
community, and return home with a group ready to lead the "Putting Community in Community Policing:
effort Process"
E. Creating & Sustaining Partnerships
• Have time to strategize about the next steps which make F. Problem-Solving—Part II
sense for your city G. Sustaining Neighborhoods
• H. How to Win Converts In and Out of r;t„
Come: Hall: Lessons Learned—A Con'
• as a team moving forward (or starting out) 4:45
• to learn, share, dialogue, question, connect with others ADJOURN
Ove 5:15
stronger partnership with other key players in your city DINNER BUFFET
• knowledge of resources for making progress back home
• perspectives on what works and doesn't work
• the latest information
3AFE COMMUNITIES:
±MUNITY POLICING IN MINNESOTA I.
Special Tfeatuhes
dule and Topics Pre-Conference Workshop on Thursday morning— Ill
the basics for those unfamiliar with community policing
or who want a refresher
6:15 Promising Practices on Thursday evening—an
PROMISING PRACTICES i opportunity to learn specifics about strategies, tools,
• Sharing What's Working and What Isn't
approaches that are working in other communities and
8:00 might be worth considering for your city
INFORMAL NETWORKING
9:00 Ongoing Dialogue about Challenges—pooling our
ADJOURN FOR EVENING collective knowledge to address the difficult questions
and pressing issues facing us as we strive to make our
Friday. September 28. 1997 communities safe
8:00 a.m.
REFRESHMENT BREAK PLUS RESOURCE i Consultation with MCP! Technical Assistants—
FAIR resources from the Minnesota Community Policing
8:30 Institute (MCPI) available at the symposium and beyond
GENERAL SESSION
"Building Support for Community Policing"
9:15 Scholarships Available for Me Community •
REFRESHMENT BREAK PLUS Representatives on Teams to ensure multi-
RESOURCE FAIR
perspective teains
9:45-11:30
CONCURRENT WORK SESSIONS FOR
COMMUNITY TEAMS
"Making It Happen" m S� p osium Presenters, Facilitators
Each Includes: 15-20 minute Overview and Resource People
Presentation plus teams working on issues
important to their community effort PARTICIPANTS WILL HAVE THE UNIQUE OPPOR-
1) Community Wide Planning and TUNITY TO LEARN FROM NATIONAL EXPERTS,
Implementation � MINNESOTA RESOURCE PEOPLE...AND YOU!
2) Political and Financial Ramifications of
Community Policing
3) Designing an Organizational Structure The Symposium Planning Committee is delighted to
That Supports COP welcome the following individuals, known nationally for
4) Managing Organizational Change their work in making communities safe, as faculty for a
11:45 major part of the symposium:
GENERAL SESSION:
"Moving From Community-Oriented Policing Harry Do/an, Po/ice Chief, Lumberton, North Carollii,
to Community-Oriented Government"
12:30 p.m. I Judith Mohr Keane, Counci/member, Sedona, Arizona
LUNCH
1:30 Bill Kirchoff, former City Manager, Redondo Beach, 41,
ADJOURN California
George Latimer, former Mayor, St. Raul, Minnesota
Jerry Oliver, Po/ice Chief, Richmond, Virginia
•
Registration ' Best Western Americanna inn(within easy driving distance from
The registration fee for this Institute is $100/person and payable I headquarters)
with registration. (Checks should be made payable to League of 520 South Highway 10,320-252-8700
'nnesota Cities.) Some scholarships are available for commu- i Room block available September 25 only!
representatives on a first come basis if needed. Please $47.95 single and$56.95 double
cafe your request on the registration fcrm and you will be j Reservation deadline:September 4
contacted.
If participants require additional housing assistance, they should
To register, complete the registration form included in this contact Joni Hagstrom at the St. Cloud Convention &Visitors
brochure and return to the Community Policing Institute at the Bureau at 800-264-2940, extension 110 or 320-656-3810. They
League of Minnesota cities no later than September 18, 1997. can provide assistance if these room blocks are no longer
Duplicate the form for multiple registrations. NOTE Since we i available!
anticipate "selling-out"this event, early registration is strongly
encouraged./ • I Conference Location
Conference headquarters (where most functions will be held) is
Individuals pre-registered will receive a confirmation to be the Best Western Kelly Inn. Some meal functions and break-out
presented at the ADVANCE REGISTRATION desk at the sessions, however, will be held at the St. Cloud Convention
Institute. Center and the Radisson Suites Hotel (all connected via
skyway).
Overnight Accommodations
To accommodate anticipated registrants for this Conference, Special Needs
blocks of sleeping rooms have been reserved at several St. If you are disabled and require special services or transporta-
tion, or if you have special dietary needs, please attach a written
Cloud hotels. Participants are responsible for making their own
reservations by contacting their preferred hotel (Make sure to I description to the registration form.
request your room from the block being held for the Com-
munity Policing Conference to obtain our special rates!). Credits
Following are the hotels, address/phone number, room rates Interested city elected officials will receive eight credits toward
and reservation deadlines: the 40 credits required for the League of Minnesota Cities
Best Western Kelly Inn(Conference headquarters) Leadership Institute for Elected Officials Certificate. Application
Highway 23&4th Avenue South,320-253-0606 has been made to the Police Officers Standards and Training
iim block available September 24 and 25 Board (POST) for credit. To be eligible participants must attend
ingle and$64 double the entire Institute.
rvation deadline:September 10 For Further information
Radisson Suite Hotel(connected to headquarters via skyway) Contact Carol Schoeneck at Government Training Service (612/
404 West St.Germain Street,320-654-1661 222-7409 or Minnesota toll free 800/652-9719) for program
Room block available September 24 and 25 questions.
$85 single/double
(NOTE:A special$59/single'government rate'may be available . Contact Cathy Dovidio at League of Minnesota Cities (612/281-
depending upon time reservation is made!) 1200 or Minnesota toll free 800/925-1122) for registration
Reservation deadline:September4 assistance.
I- -t
1997 COMMUNITY POLICING CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FORM
Please type or print
Name
Name for badge
Title
City or Organization
Mailing address
City State Zip
Daytime phone( ) Fax( ) e-mail
Amount Enclosed p Scholarship Requested(community representative only) Amount Needed
I plan to attend the Pre-Conference Workshop: 0 Yes 0 No I am attending as a member of a team from
help us anticipate attendance at the breakout sessions,please circle below which sessions you are planning to attend:
ill Thursday Friday
(entire team attends same session)
2:00 ABCD
I 3:30 EFGH 1 2 3 4
I Return this registration form no later than
Ig� September 18,1997 to:Minnesota Community Policing Institute,i45 University Avenue West,St.Paul,
Minnesota55103-2044. •
L J
Item No.
Staff Report No. VIFIri e..
111 Meeting Date: July 28, 1997
Type of Business: CB
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
C4:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Mayor and City Council
From: James Ericson,Planning Associate
Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution No. 5154, a Resolution approving a
Development Review for Silver Lake Commons, 2637 - 2655 Highway 10;
Planning Case No. 487-97
Date of Report: September 5, 1997
Overview
Proposal:
The applicant, MSP Real Estate, Inc., is requesting approval of a revised development review for
the Silver Lake Commons project located at 2637 -2665 Highway 10, property which includes
the existing Red Oak Apartments (2657 and 2665 Highway 10) and two privately held vacant
lots. The development proposal no longer involves the vacant lot owned by the City. The
• applicant proposes to construct 10 two-level, three and four bedroom rental townhome-styled
dwelling units on the two vacant parcels while completely rehabilitating the 40 existing apartment
units. New hipped-style roofs and new siding will be added to the apartment buildings to match
the design of the proposed townhomes. The applicant is also proposing to replace all of the
carpeting and vinyl flooring, windows, and the kitchen appliances and cabinets. They will be
replacing furnaces and water heaters and light fixtures as needed.
Type of Review:
The proposed Silver Lake Commons development is consistent with the Mounds View
Comprehensive Plan, which shows this property for High Density Residential. It is also consistent
with the existing zoning, in that R-4 and R-3 allow for multiple family dwellings at 17.4 units per
acre. The request before City Council is for approval of a development review, or site plan
review, which is technical in nature. Development review is used to check if the proposal meets
all of the zoning requirements such as setbacks, building heights, open space and parking
requirements. Development review is required by Section 1006.06, Subd. 2 and Subd. 3 of the
Mounds View Municipal Code, and is not subject to a public hearing requirement.
Changes to Approved Site Plan:
The most evident change to the site plan is the elimination of the six-unit building fronting
Highway 10 on the City-owned parcel. The driveway that had serviced these units has also been
removed. The on-site management office and recreation center has been relocated near the south
end of the 26-stall garage structure. The locations of the larger play structure and the grill/picnic
area have been moved closer to the dwelling units to accommodate them completely on the
subject property. As a result of the reduction in dwelling units, parking spaces were reduced as
well but meet the requirements of the Code and Planning Commission Resolution 513-97.
Silver Lake Commons Amended Development Review
Planning Case No. 487-97
September 8, 1997 •
Page 2
Action by the Planning Commission:
On July 16, 1997 and again on September 3, 1997, the Planning Commission, in Resolutions
514-97 and 528-97, recommended approval of the development review request. Also on July 16,
1997, the Planning Commission approved a variance in the parking ratios to allow a reduction in
the amount of parking required from 2.5 spaces per unit (1 garage space and 1.5 surface spaces)
to 2.15 spaces per unit (1 garage space and 1.15 surface stalls). The applicant has shown there is
sufficient area on the site to build the additional 17 spaces needed to meet the full ratio for surface
parking (i.e. proof of parking).
Discussion
Dimensional Requirements:
Required Proposed: Met ?
Building Setbacks:
Front (Highway 10): 30 feet 30 feet Yes
Side(East) 20 feet 30 feet Yes
Rear: 40 feet 48 feet Yes
Parking Lot Setbacks: 5 feet 5 feet Yes
Minimum lot width: 100 feet 200 feet Yes .
Minimum lot area:
(2,500 sf per D.U.):
10 New Units 25,000 sf 57,030 sf Yes
50 Total Units 125,000 sf 127,665 sf Yes
Usable Open Space per unit
(625 sf per D.U.):
10 New Units 6,250 sf 20,000 sf Yes
New buildings height: <45 feet 30 feet Yes
Minimum floor area per D.U.:
Three bedroom units: 870 sf 1,320 sf Yes
Four bedroom units: 920 sf 1,620 sf Yes
Parking requirements:
Uncovered: (1.15 per unit) 58 spaces 58 spaces Yes *
Covered: (1.0 per unit) 50 spaces 51 spaces Yes
*On July 16, 1997, the Planing Commission approved Resolution 513-97,which approved a reduction in
the ratio ofsurface parking stalls per dwelling unit from 1.5 to 1.15, contingent upon the balance being set
aside as proof of parking,which could be utilized in the future as needed.
Density:
The density(dwelling units per acre) allowed in the R-3 and R-4 zoning districts is 17.4 dwelling
units per acre. The overall density of the proposed Silver Lake Commons development—including i
the existing Red Oak apartments--would be 17.0 units per acre. The density of the new
construction--excluding the existing apartments--would be 7.6 dwelling units per acre. The
existing apartments exceed the current density requirements.
Silver Lake Commons Amended Development Review
Planning Case No. 487-97
• September 8, 1997
Page 3
Drainage and Ponding:
The drainage plan has been reviewed and has been found acceptable by the City's engineer, Rocky
Keehn. The original drainage plan utilized the city-owned property for ponding and conveyance
of the drainage and run-off. Without this parcel, there is less of a drainage impact as the site
would no longer have to accommodate drainage from Eastwood Road. The plans as currently
proposed would utilize a two storm-water sewers to direct drainage to a low area behind the six-
unit building. Water would then drain from this low area into the Highway 10 right of way. This
development does not need to be reviewed by the Rice Creek Watershed District and a NURP
pond is not required. The applicants will need to obtain a permit from MnDOT for the
stormwater run-off and for any work that will be done within the right of way. A secondary issue
with regards to drainage involves the property located at 7800 Eastwood Road. Because of the
placement of buildings and parking areas in the traditional pathway for drainage on the from the
neighboring property, the applicant will grade a swale on the adjoining property to the north to
route the water from that lot to the proposed low area shown on the drainage plan. The property
owner for 7800 Eastwood Road has agreed to grant an easement to the applicant to allow the
grading work to be done on their lot. This easement document has been attached for review.
Access and Parking:
No changes with regard to access have been made to the site plan. Access to the site will be
accomplished with a single entryway south of the existing Red Oak Apartments entryway. The
drive access will be in between the apartments and the townhome units. The existing driveway
servicing Red Oak Apartments will be removed. The proposed driveway would be 28 feet wide
as requested by the Fire Marshal.
The number of parking spaces have been reduced to account for the six fewer dwelling units.
Eight future parking stalls are shown on the plan adjacent to the main entryway along Highway
10. Since parking can be located within five feet of a property line in residential districts, this
location--while not optimal--is acceptable. There are nine additional future parking stalls on the
north side of the 17-unit Red Oak Apartment building. Figuring in the 17 future parking stalls, 75
surface parking stalls are possible, which meets the criteria of the City Code and Planning
Commission Resolution 513-97. There would be 51 garage stalls for the 50 dwelling units.
Altogether, 109 parking stalls would be provided with an additional 17 stalls set aside in proof-of-
parking. Including the 17 future stalls, 126 stalls could be provided.
Landscaping:
The landscape plan submitted by the applicant had been reviewed and found acceptable by Rick
Wriskey, the City Forester. The applicant has shown a desire to retain as many significant tress
as possible on the vacant lots. Staff has included a condition that these trees be fenced during
construction to protect fragile root systems and prevent heavy machinery from being place within
the dripline of the trees. Additional plantings have been added along the property line between
the proposed development and the City-owned property.
Silver Lake Commons Amended Development Review
Planning Case No. 487-97
September 8, 1997 •
Page 4
Open Space and Play Area:
Section 1104.02, Subd. 2b. of the Zoning Code requires 625 square feet of usable open space per
multiple dwelling unit. Considering only the 10 new units to be constructed, the required amount
of open space would be 6,250 square feet. The applicants propose at least 11,000 square feet of
open space and play areas.
The applicant continues to propose two play areas for this development: a tot lot located between
the existing Red Oak Apartment buildings, and another larger area with play equipment, open play
area, picnic area and barbeque grills located behind the rental townhome units. A small, indoor
recreation/social room will be provided next to the rental office for year-round gatherings or other
similar functions.
Currently, there is very little usable green space available on the Red Oak property. Children have
been playing in the parking lot, driveway, unsecured lawn area along Highway 10 or in the
Highway 10 right of way itself, none of which are suitable due to safety considerations. The
parking areas are currently separated from the buildings by less than ten feet. With the relocation
of the driveway south of the apartment buildings, an expanse of green space will be created as
well as a 28-foot buffer from the parking lot for the 2657 Highway 10 building.
Site Renovation:
•
One of the major components of this project is the renovation of the existing Red Oak
Apartments, which has fallen into a state of neglect and disrepair. The buildings will be
completely renovated to match the design of the new rental townhomes. In addition to exterior
improvements such as new hip-styled roofs, windows and siding, the interior will refurbished as
well. Apartments will be renovated three or four at a time, depending upon the number of vacant
units. As units are completed, existing residents will move into them, vacating their old
apartments. This process will continue until each apartment has been completed. The existing
covered garages on the site will be razed and replaced by two new garage buildings, one of which
accommodating 15 stalls, and the other 26 stalls.
Utilities and Easements; Platting:
There are water and sewer lines in both Eastwood Road and Highway 10, so utilities are available
to the site. The applicant will need to replat the site to remove the lot lines since development
will be crossing those lines. A park dedication fee will need to be paid as a result of the minor
subdivision. The need for easements for utilities and drainage for the development would be
addressed at that time.
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution 5144, approving a development review for MSP Real Estate, Inc. to allow for
the construction of 10 new two-level rental townhome units and the complete rehabilitation of the
existing Red Oak Apartments on properties located at 2637-2665 Highway 10, with stipulations. •
Silver Lake Commons Amended Development Review
Planning Case No. 487-97
• September 8, 1997
Page 5
James Ericson, Planning Associate
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. 5154
2. Zoning Map
3. Revised Site,Drainage and Landscape Plans,dated 9/5/97
4. Drainage Easement for 7800 Eastwood Road
5. Planning Commission Resolution 528-97
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 5154 •
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
FOR THE SILVER LAKE COMMONS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED
AT 2637 -2665 HIGHWAY 10; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. 487-97
WHEREAS, MSP Real Estate, Inc. has applied for a development review to renovate the
existing Red Oak Apartments and to construct ten townhouse-styled dwelling units on the parcels
located at 2637 - 2655 Highway 10, property zoned R-3 and R-4, medium and high density
residential, legally described as follows:
LOTS 79 THROUGH 82 AND LOT 83, EXCEPT THE REAR 150 FEET THEREOF;
SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 30, RANGE 23, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a
development review be conducted for this and similar projects; and,
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has made findings that the application from •
MSP Real Estate, Inc. meets the dimensional requirements as stated below:
Required Proposed: Met?,
Building Setbacks:
Front(Highway 10): 30 feet 30 feet Yes
Side(East) 20 feet 30 feet Yes
Rear: 40 feet 48 feet Yes
Parking Lot Setbacks: 5 feet 5 feet Yes
Minimum lot width: 100 feet 200 feet Yes
Minimum lot area:
(2,500 sf per D.U.):
10 New Units 25,000 sf 57,030 sf Yes
50 Total Units 125,000 sf 127,665 sf Yes
Usable Open Space per unit
(625 sf per D.U.):
10 New Units 6,250 sf 20,000 sf Yes
New buildings height: <45 feet 30 feet Yes
Minimum floor area per D.U.:
Three bedroom units: 870 sq.ft. 1,320 sq.ft. Yes
Four bedroom units: 920 sq.ft. 1,620 sq.ft. Yes
Parking requirements:
Uncovered: (1.15 per unit) 58 spaces 58 spaces • Yes*
11
Covered: (1.0 per unit) 50 spaces 51 spaces Yes
*On July 16, 1997, the Planing Commission approved Resolution 513-97,which approved a reduction in
the ratio of sulface parking stalls per dwelling unit from 1.5 to 1.15,contingent upon the balance being set
aside as proof of parking, which could be utilized in the future as needed.
Resolution No. 5154
Silver Lake Commons Development Review
• September 8, 1997
Page 2
WHEREAS, on July 16, 1997, the Planning Commission in Resolution 514-97
recommended approval of the original development review request for the Silver Lake Commons
residential development; and
WHEREAS, on July 28, 1997, The Mounds View City Council in Resolution 5144
approved the original development review request for the Silver Lake Commons residential
development; and,
WHEREAS, the site plans for the Silver Lake Commons Residential Development have
been amended to exclude the City-owned parcel at 2625 Highway 10 thus necessitating a
reapproval of the development; and,
WHEREAS, on September 3, 1997, The Planning Commission in Resolution 528-97
recommended approval of a revised development review request for the Silver Lake Commons
residential development; and,
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council does hereby find that the landscape plan as
proposed satisfies the requirements of the Code as amended in the stipulations below; and,
• WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed the drainage plan for this site and has found
it acceptable and consistent with the Master Drainage Plan previously approved by the City
Council and Rice Creek Watershed District; and,
WHEREAS, the City Fire Marshal has reviewed the site plans and finds the layout meets
Fire Department requirements for emergency vehicle access.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View City Council does
hereby approve the development review request of MSP Real Estate for the Silver Lake
Commons development, subject to the following stipulations:
1. Prior to obtaining any building permits or grading permits, the applicant shall
perform the following:
a. Obtain permit approval from MnDOT for the relocation of the entrance to
the project area, the construction of a right turn lane into the project, an
acceleration lane for right turns exiting the project and for any regrading
within the MnDOT right of way.
b. A development contract shall be drafted and reviewed by the applicant. It
shall include surety for construction of the Highway 10 right of way
improvements. The contract shall be executed prior to the issuance of
building permits.
Resolution No. 5154
Silver Lake Commons Development Review
September 8, 1997 •
Page 3
2. The applicant shall obtain a ten-foot wide pedestrian easement from either of the
two neighboring properties abutting Eastwood Road (either 2625 Highway 10 or
7800 Eastwood Road)to allow for a gated pedestrian way from the Silver Lake
Commons development to Eastwood Road.
3. Approval of this development review request shall be contingent upon City
Council approval of the subdivision request for this development.
Adopted this 8th day of September, 1997.
Duane McCarty, Mayor
ATTEST:
Charles Whiting, City Clerk/Administrator •
(SEAL)
NADATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\487-97\NEW-CC.RES
•
i 8000; 8C05 I 601 E7 8 _I 8006 8000 auu 1 8010 ._'
7990 7985 8004 7981 7990 a7981 7990-a
7989 1 7996 n: 7993 7990
- ; 79801,/, 7975 7970 7979 7980 7969 7980 7979 ( 7980 c 7985 7970
7960 79651 7960 C 7959 7970 7965 7960 7961 7984
n 7966 7969
7950 7955 I 7956 W 7949 7954 7959 I 7950 7951 f 7954
7934 7g� 7950 7940 7945 7946 7927 H I LLV I EW ;
7932 7930 7935 I 7930 7917 7944
R. 1 7901
PARK
Q N N N 17900 , 7901 7900 N I r N `7900 7901 N ` N 7900 PF .
HILLV1EW ROAO
NV h
ilkO :UC) 7891 i N I N 788 78951 11 I N 7890 788503 1 1 N 7864
�0 7876 Z 7885 I 7866 7867 1 7870 7869 7858 •
N 8-2
7870 ca
= 7877 785 7851 I 7860 7865 1 7852
Bul
770• ^�, i§o 78� 784 7841 7850 7855 7846 g .
7830 0 I 7840 7835 7840
11-3 �:-30` 7351 7815 77907815 7800 R-4. 3
7760 r1 ti 'le �d� 781.N 7805 I 7780
^; 1 7809 I m0 3 7801 I 7760
7Saa
7710 8—Z . ' : :R-4 7301 W 775 1 I 7750
1 i 11 I 'i 7767 I 7760 o 7741 I 7740
i?—i Fc. Egg ti� 7761 775o 7731 ( 7730
R—Z a° 7801 Red Oak 4
H—Z ` par ' -
_ 755 I ma 7721 ( 7720
• 7745 I 7710 7711
N 7715 I N
0 773• •
7700
::........................... O,Ly-owned N N .R-2
7s92 R. • Land ..
N 7590 PUO — — i_CT Ln 2553
i cc 76$ n _..m CO �� "I' NNNN NNNNN 2551 �'
788• W �' --•• N 12249 =
?5
Q, 'Q�, N 2547 _1
a 3-3 ti,43 IQ41
1 H-4 T4s
n C: 2.539
2537
ti
( { SILVER VIEW141681117111111;111t7-
,1
,1
I ` N lir 3-2 �v4 ;,
PARK N RNs �.�-
CC
R-2cc j1�
' 7552 > .. ' r, M _I" N /,y,. ny
7::.;0 ul o-N ,0,7132 ea, i. _
7512 PF N N C•4 N N"?4,3
Qf cp O O
7540 �-N C.4
�► O
7532 m 0. N...� N N�N N • GaN �fj
: 7530' 7522Na CM �� 42
•; N."N N 'a m
-4.1,-.4744'� � a� N R-4
:€.74 I 9 m I 750 - ... ..�...... ....._... N N/ a`O n N fN............ O to
N
N <O a(II 9 - C
•
Zoning Map Planning Cases 487-97 and504-97
Applicant: MSP Real Estate AT n
Project: Silver Lake Commons ..
9-04-1997 3: 19AM FROM MSP REAL ESTATE. INC. 612 336 4565 P. 2
i
EASEMENT
FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE OF STORM WATER RUNOFF
This Easement granted this 2274- day of . 997 by
t -5A il and wife
("Grantors') in favor of Mounds View Family Apartments Limited Partnership, a Mimesota
limited liability partnership ("Grantee').
WHEREAS, Grantors arc the fee owners of certain real property legally described on
attached Exhibit A (the "Servient Property"): and
WHEREAS, Grantors wish to grant to Grantee a non-exclusive easement for the •
installation (by surface grading) and maintenance for surface drainage of storm water runoff
across a attain portion of the Servient Property, for the benefit of the Servient Property and/or
for the benefit of and appurtenant to that certain property of the Grantee described on attached
Exhibit B (the "Benefited Property");
NOW, THEREFORE, Grantors, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good
and valuable consideration, received from Grantee, do hereby agree as follows:
1. Grantors do hereby grant and convey unto Grantee, its successors and assigns a
permanent. non-exclusive and appurtenant easement for the installation (by surface grading)and
maintenance for surface drainage of storm water runoff across that portion of the Servient
Property described on attached Exhibit C (the -Easement"), which Easement shall be for the
benefit of and appurtenant to the above-described Benefited Property.
2. Grantors hereby reserve unto themselves and their successors and assigns the right
to use the Easement for other purposes not inconsistent with the rights granted to Grantee under
this easement agreement.
3. Grantee agrees that it shall pay for the cost of the design. grading, seeding and
landscaping work(if any)to be done in association with the Storm water surface drainage located
on the Easement. The extent of landscaping, if any, shall be in Grantee's sole discretion.
GADOCSUKJALVEM1=9. .3404
i
9-04.-1997 3:20AM FROM MSP REAL ESTATE. INC. 612 336 4.565 P. 3
4. Grantee shall have the right, but shall not be required to, maintain the easement
• area to ensure proper drainage. However, Grantors shall be responsible for mowing, care of
landscaping. etc.
5. The owners of the Servient Property and the Benefited Property from time to time
Will execute, acknowledge and deliver such further assurances of the Easement as may be
necessary, convenient or desirable for the purposes of the clarifying, letter locating, releasing
or farther defining the nature, extent and location of the Easement.
[THE NEXT PAGE IS THE SIGNATURE PAGE]
•
• c.IOU UBL YSKUSZ2ss 1.MEINt
9-04-1997 3:20AM FROM MSP REAL ESTATE. INC. 612 336 4565 P. 4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Grantors have caused thus Easement to be executed as of the date first •
written above.
Lf/ / .
5a-
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY' OF /&,Y'Si'U'
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this.020Alay of ig(,al 1997,
by Ar a/9/ /4]. Z_Qr5,01 and �v/1 , husband and wife.
•
Notary Public
,, MICHELE R.W?'IARD
i NOTARY PUBLIC• L::. .ESOTA
RAMSEY CO.NTY
IA,Comm.fl�irss Jan.31.2UCC
.
•
-3-
9-04-1997 3:20AM FROM MSP REAL ESTATE. INC. 612 336 4565 P. S
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantee has caused this Appurtenant Easement to be executed
as of the date first written above.
Mounds View Family Apartments Limited
Partnership, a Minnesota limited liability
partnership
By MSP Real Estate, Inc., a Minnesota corporation,
its General Partner
By f/1
Milo S. Pinkerton,
Its President
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ss.
• The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I R W. day of
414 s , 1997, by Milo S. Pinkerton, the President of MSP Real Estate, Inc., a
Minnaota corporation, as General Partner of Mounds View Family Apartments Limited
Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of the partnership.
Notary blic
This instrument drafted by:
Paul Kaminski `�:"'` KAREN F SWAGER
Best E. NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA
Flanaganw RAMSEY COUNTY
Professional Limited Liability Partnership " �; �!Colslpltslon&xplras tan.31.2000
4000 First Bank Place
601 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55402-4331
•
-4--
G DOCSIPUBLIPEKIS2289 1.MEM
9-04-1997 3:20AM FROM MSP REAL ESTATE. INC. 612 336 4565 P. 6
EXHIBIT A •
Legal Description for Servient Property
Lot 77 Spring Park Hillview Addition
S
•
9-04-1997 3:21AM FROM MSP REAL ESTATE. INC. 612 336 4565 P. 7
• EXHIBIT B
Legal Description for Benefited Property
All of lots 79, 80, 81, 82, and that part of lot 83 lying southwesterly of the northeasterly 150.00 feet
thereof, Spring Lake Park all View, according to the plat thereof and situated in Ramsey County,
Minnesota.
•
•
9-04-1997 3:21AM FROM MSP REAL ESTATE. INC. 612 336 4565 P. 8
. i
.
I
II
z ! •
/ 4 P. L j.—....,
• A 1 g -Imt. _ .,. / ` S =
W V t / Q • • 4 �.
. i
f
4° L _ _ ...,,,,,,.
. „iii .-..,...it
.* i 4E- . _telt Z "- 111
, . ig 0 0.1 .Ni . 1--44: EL),N. 1 smikar4 I
i 11
' . t .Hi;=1.411110m-
. �r -�. lit�V Tia-111 caul.
1,011
"/ '•
,..I i \
7 • ,
.....; I a I ,..le,", ..,„1.;
sc_ ' .14. PP4'
Pmfilm----- ii-Odi'
, _ ,.. .- I. - MIN
„ _ ..... _ ...... .:
•
1 gr 1-4_ la, ; 4 ...,,, . 2.. fri..1::;:a. i
• 4.....r•-•.. ....:=.,:eft, •4,,„
•
\:\INN .
A r--7 "?..-cu, r--f i
! 4
T riVICTir19 11Ni7 LI VN,ISip= I
a i 4 I
`h 2
h _ = c —
-a a,-
..
. /1/4„.„ ,.../ qpii,......)../ _ _4
i." .2 _ (.,. ,
Itt%fi .12
1 ,
ri ..
. . ltr :.; A
` ►,I 0. m .:' II 61.
.
itiZ •
\ \ , - .
•
-- --- ---- . —�-- .. • . m
•
• MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 528-97
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
FOR TIlE SILVER LAKE COMMONS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED
AT 2637- 2665 HIGHWAY 10; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. 487-97
WHEREAS, MSP Real Estate, Inc. has applied for a development review to renovate the
existing Red Oak Apartments and to construct ten townhouse-styled dwelling units on the parcels
located at 2637 -2655 Highway 10, property zoned R-3 and R-4, medium and high density
residential, legally described as follows:
LOTS 79 THROUGH 82 AND LOT 83, EXCEPT THE REAR 150 FEET THEREOF;
SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 30, RANGE 23, RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a
development review be conducted for this and similar projects; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has made findings that the application from MSP
Real Estate, Inc. meets the dimensional requirements as stated below:
Zggikcci Proposed: Met?
Building Setbacks:
Front(Highway 10): 30 feet 30 feet Yes
Side(East) 20 feet 30 feet Yes
Rear: 40 feet 48 feet Yes
Parking Lot Setbacks: 5 feet 5 feet Yes
Minimum lot width: 100 feet 200 feet Yes
Minimum lot area:
(2,500 sf per D.U.):
10 New Units 25,000 sf 57,030 sf Yes
50 Total Units 125,000 sf 127,665 sf Yes
Usable Open Space per unit
(625 sf per D.U.):
10 New Units 6,250 sf 20,000 sf Yes
New buildings height: <45 feet 30 feet Yes
Minimum floor area per D.U.:
Three bedroom units: 870 sq.ft. 1,320 sq.ft. Yes
Four bedroom units: 920 sq.ft. 1,620 sq.ft. Yes
Parking requirements:
• Uncovered: (1.15 per unit) 58 spaces 58 spaces Yes *
Covered: (1.0 per unit) 50 spaces 51 spaces Yes
*On July 16, 1997, the Planing Commission approved Resolution 513-97,which approved a reduction in
the ratio ofsurface parking stalls per dwelling unit from 1.5 to 1.15, contingent upon the balance being set
aside as proof of parking,which could be utilized in the future as needed.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 528-97
Silver Lake Commons Development Review
September 3, 1997 •
Page 2
WHEREAS, on July 16, 1997, the Planning Commission in Resolution 514-97
recommended approval of the development review request for the Silver Lake Commons
residential development; and
WHEREAS, on July 28, 1997, The Mounds View City Council in Resolution 5144
approved the development review request for the Silver Lake Commons residential
development; and,
WHEREAS, the site plans for the Silver Lake Commons Residential Development have
been amended to exclude the City-owned parcel at 2625 Highway 10 thus necessitating a
reapproval of the development; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does hereby find that the landscape plan as
proposed satisfies the requirements of the Code as amended in the stipulations below; and,
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed the drainage plan for this site and has found
it acceptable and consistent with the Master Drainage Plan previously approved by the City
Council and Rice Creek Watershed District; and,
WHEREAS, the City Fire Marshal has reviewed the site plans and finds the layout meets
41110
Fire Department requirements for emergency vehicle access.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Planning Commission
does hereby recommend to the City Council that the development review for the Silver Lake
Commons development project proposed by MSP Real Estate, Inc. be approved subject to the
following stipulations:
1. Prior to action by the City Council on this development review, the applicant
shall:
a. Revise the landscape plan to show a row of tree or shrub plantings along
the property line adjacent to the City-owned property to act as a screen
between the proposed residences and any future use of the City property.
b. Revise the parking layout to show one additional parking space so that the
count of surface parking is 58 spaces with 17 additional spaces set aside as
future parking for a total of 75 possible surface spaces.
c. Add a note to the site plan which states:
"A variance in required parking ratios was approved for this property by
•
Planning Commission Resolution No. 513-97. The parking ratios approved for
this property are as follows:
Planning Commission Resolution No. 528-97
Silver Lake Commons Development Review
• September 3, 1997
Page 3
1.15 surface space per dwelling unit
1 garage space per dwelling unit
The property owner is obligated to build up to an additional 17 parking spaces,
which would meet the parking ratios required by the Zoning Code, if deemed
necessary by the City based on future parking patterns and evidence that parking
needs cannot be satisfied on-site. The property owner shall be notified in writing
that additional parking must be built, and upon such notice, shall construct the
additional parking within 3 months, with consideration for weather conditions"
d. Add a note to the site plan which states, "All non-landscaped pervious
surfaces are to be sodded" No seeded areas are to be allowed.
e. Obtain a permanent drainage easement for that area on 7800 Eastwood
Road to be regraded for drainage and flood control purposes. The
easement shall be executed prior to approval of the development review by
the City Council.
f. Revise the site plan to show a chain link fence along the property line
adjacent to the City-owned parcel to be tied into the south end of the six
unit townhouse building.
2. Prior to obtaining any building permits or grading permits, the applicant shall
perform the following:
a. Obtain permit approval from MnDOT for the relocation of the entrance to
the project area, the construction of a right turn lane into the project, an
acceleration lane for right turns exiting the project and for any regrading
within the MnDOT right of way.
b. A development contract shall be drafted and reviewed by the applicant. It
shall include surety for construction of the Highway 10 right of way
improvements. The contract shall be executed prior to the issuance of
building permits.
2. The applicant shall obtain a ten-foot wide pedestrian easement from either of the
two neighboring properties abutting Eastwood Road (either 2625 Highway 10 or
7800 Eastwood Road) to allow for a gated pedestrian way from the Silver Lake
Commons development to Eastwood Road.
• 3. Approval of this development review request shall be contingent upon City
Council approval of the subdivision request for this development.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 528-97
Silver Lake Commons Development Review
September 3, 1997 •
Page 4
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward
this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes.
Adopted this 3rd day of September, 1997.
Jerry Peterson, Chairperson
ATTEST:
James Ericson, Planning Associate
(SEAL)
N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\487-97\AMENDED.RES
•
Item No.
Staff Report No. 97-07a0ge.
Meeting Date: September 8, 1997
• Type of Business: C.B.
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA: Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
Item Title/Subject: Consideration of City Hall HVAC RFP
Date of Report: September 4, 1997
As presented at the September 2, 1997 Council Work Session, staff interviewed four firms for
the City Hall HVAC evaluations. Staff found all candidates exceptionally qualified and is
recommending Council award the project to Wold Architects and Engineers for the sum on
$10,000.00.
This portion of the project will be funded from previously budgeted allotments for the
replacement of the City Hall HVAC system.
/ y
•
Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
RECOMMENDATION: Council award the evaluation process of the City Hall HVAC
renovation to WOLD Architects and Engineers for the sum of$10,000.00.
S
' C.
• Resolution No. 5153
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
County of Ramsey
State of Minnesota
A resolution certifying the 1998 proposed operating budget
and property tax levy, and setting the date for a public hearing
on said budget and levy pursuant to State Statutes.
WHEREAS, State Statutes require taxing jurisdictions to adopt a proposed levy on or before
September 15th for the subsequent year;
WHEREAS, said Statutes also require taxing jurisdictions to select a date for a public hearing
and continuation hearing, if necessary, on its budget and proposed property tax levy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Mounds View,
Minnesota:
1) Pursuant to State Statutes, the 1998 General Fund Budget including the debt service on
the outstanding fire bonds totaling $3,700,899 is hereby adopted.
2) Pursuant to State Statutes, the following proposed 1998 property tax levy (net levy after
• deducting homestead and agricultural credit aid) is hereby adopted:
General Fund $1,644,940
Fire Bonds 87.638
Total $1,732,578
3) A public hearing on the Proposed 1998 Budget and property tax levy will be held at 6:00
p.m. on December 3, 1997 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 2401 Highway 10,
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112. Should it be necessary to continue the meeting at a
later date, such continuation meeting will be held at 6:00 p.m. on December 10, 1997 in
said Council Chambers.
Adopted this 8th day of September, 1997.
Mayor
• Clerk-Administrator
} 111
q7-
Resolution No. 5156
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
County of Ramsey
State of Minnesota
A resolution approving an employment agreement for the golf course superintendent and
establishing incentive pay for golf course personnel.
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View constructed and operates a nine hole golf course;
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is in its best interest to establish incentive pay for
golf course personnel and to enter into an employment contract for the management of the golf
course.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Mounds View,
Minnesota that the Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized to enter into an
employment contract for management service at The Bridges, the City's golf course, with John
Hammerschmidt with incentive pay for golf course personnel under the terms and conditions as
outlined in the attached employment contract.
Adopted this 8th day of September, 1997.
•
Mayor
Clerk-Administrator
1111
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Employment Agreement ("Agreement"), dated , 1997 .
is made between the CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, a municipal corporation under the laws of
Minnesota("City") and JOHN HAMMERSCHMIDT ("Hamznerschmidt") for the position of the
City's Golf Course Superintendent.
RECITALS
1. The City is the owner of a golf course ("The Bridges") located at
in the City of Mounds View.
2. Hammerschmidt is experienced in the management of golf courses and is willing to enter
into this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained
in this Agreement, the City and Hammerschmidt agree as follows:
ARTICLE I: TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT
The initial term of this Agreement will be three years, commencing on January 1, 1997
and continuing through December 31, 1999. This Agreement shall automatically renew for two
additional three-year terms under the same terms and conditions unless either party gives written
notice of termination to the other party on or before June 30 in the third year of each three-year •
term of the Agreement, such termination may be made by either party without penalty or cause.
ARTICLE II: COMPENSATION
The City will pay Harnmerschmidt a base salary of$40,000 per year in 1997 plus its
standard contributions toward the Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Fund,Social Security,
Medicare, and health insurance. In future years, Hammerschmidt's base salary will increase by
the same percentage increase granted to City administrative personnel. In addition,
Halnmerschmidt will be eligible for incentive pay (as defined herein) based on performance of
The Bridges and the total personnel costs at The Bridges with total compensation not to exceed
95% of the City Clerk-Administrator's maximum salary- Incentive pay shall not exceed 50%of
Hammerschmidt's total compensation. Hammerschmidt's total compensation shall not exceed any
limits established by Minnesota Statutes and shall be established in such a manner so as to
maintain the City's compliance with the State of Minnesota's pay equity statutes. The
compensation and benefits set out in this Article represent the total compensation to be paid to
Hammerschmidt.
Hammerschmidt's incentive pay will be calculated annually and established by the City
Council in an amount up to 15% of the gross revenues at The Bridges. Total compensation for
all City employees at The Bridges, including incentive pay established by the City Council, shall
not exceed 44% of gross revenues at The Bridges. Gross revenues shall include all revenues
derived from activities conducted at The Bridges, less general sales taxes and sales taxes imposed •
CARLSK129390 1
MU12S-33
C/Z 3Ot/d 0LE6LEEZI9'13I N3AV D '8 AQ3NN3N'WO2id tb' It 46-90-d3S
on the sale of alcoholic beverages. Prepaid fees will not be considered revenues until such time
as The Bridges has provided the goods or services necessary to earn such fees. Discounts will
• be considered a reduction of gross revenues. Revenues from lessons, interest earnings and the
proceeds from the sale of non-merchandise items will be excluded from gross revenues. The
average markup on merchandise sales,which shall include food,beverages,apparel,memorabilia,
golf equipment and supplies and similar items, shall be at least 85% of the cost of said
merchandise including shipping and/or delivery charges. Total personnel costs shall include all
salaries, including incentive pay, and the associated employer's share of benefits including but
not limited to retirement, payroll taxes, workers' compensation, health insurance and
unemployment. Personnel costs shall exclude the personnel costs associated with lessons.
ARTICLE III: DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The City and Hamunerschmidt agree to cooperate in effectively operating and maintaining
The Bridges and other city facilities and equipment. Whenever possible, golf course employees
and other city employees will assist each other with no billing to the other department or
program, provided that the overall time spent by golf course employees at other city facilities
during a year is approximately equal to time other city employees spend assisting the golf course.
Hannmerschmidt's Duties and Responsibilities. Hammerschmidt will be responsible for
the management and operation of The Bridges. Hammerschmidt shall devote his full and best
efforts to his employment at The Bridges. Hammerschmidt will achieve marketing, sales,
profitability and quality service goals for The Bridges by executing marketing strategies,
providing quality service to the customers, and employing leadership and managerial skills
• effectively. In addition, Hammerschmidt agrees to do the following:
1. Hammerschmidt shall prepare a budget each year for the ensuing year,including estimated
revenues and expenses. Hammerschmidt will provide preliminary information on or
before August 1 of each year and will provide updates as new information becomes
available. Final budget adoption by the City Council will take place on or before
December 31 of each year. Revenue estimates will included estimated usage of golf
course facilities and proposed fees for cart rentals and the use of the greens and driving
ranges and lesson fees. Estimated expense detail will be provided for all operating and
proposed capital outlays, including Hamunerschmidt's recommendations for salary and
incentive pay for all golf course employees.
2. Hammerschmidt shall develop five-year and ten-year capital improvement plans in
conformance with City Charter requirements, which shall be subject to review and
approval by the City. The improvement plans will include, but will not be limited to,
putting greens, tees, fairways, rough, sand bunkers, cart paths, bridges, trees, irrigation
systems, drainage systems, landscaping, building structures, driving range and practice
areas, parking lots, and netting. By a date established by the City Clerk-Administrator
each year, Hamrnerschmidt shall submit to the City an annual implementation program,
including the estimated cost for improvements,which identifies the portions of the capital
improvement plan that Hammerschmidt proposes to implement during the following year.
•
CARLSA129390 2
290125.33
/£ 3Ottd 0I£FSL££Z I9'Q I N3A'dao '8 AQ3NN3N'Woad zb' t t Ls-so-d39
3. Hanunerschmidt shall make recommendations to the City Clerk-Administrator and the
City Council for hiring personnel and will train the personnel necessary to successfully
maintain and operate The Bridges. Hammerschmidt agrees to comply with all applicable
federal, state and local laws, resolutions, ordinances, rules, regulations, and executive
orders pertaining to unlawful discrimination on account of race, color, creed, religion,
national origin, sex, marital status, disability, age, or status with regard to public
assistance. Hannlnerschmidt shall establish and maintain a procedure to discipline
employees for cause in compliance with the City's personnel regulations_
4. Hammerschmidt shall supervise, manage, and oversee the day-to-day operations of The
Bridges, including, but not limited to, overseeing the maintenance of the golf course and
its buildings and equipment, scheduling the hours of operation of the golf course, and
determining the day-to-day operating procedures of the golf course.
5. Hammerschmidt shall make every effort to keep the golf course open for play at all times.
The closure of the golf course because of severe weather, for the purpose of performing
improvements, or for any other reason shall be at Hamrnerschmidt's discretion, and
Hammerschmidt shall be responsible for providing reasonable notice to the City of the
necessity of closing the golf course and the reasons therefor.
6. Hammerschmidt shall develop and maintain systems to ensure the proper maintenance of
facilities and equipment. The City reserves the right to inspect the facilities and
equipment at least quarterly to insure that it is being properly maintained.
7. Hammerschmidt shall oversee the grounds maintenance on all greens, tees, fairways, •
roughs, driving range,clubhouse lawn, and all other turf area within the boundaries of the
golf course property. Such maintenance shall be maintained at a level that equals or
exceeds the maintenance standards as set forth in Exhibit A. The City reserves the right
to reasonably modify the minimum maintenance standards in order to comply with any
present or future laws or regulations.
8. Hammerschmidt shall operate and maintain the golf course in accordance with all federal,
state, and local laws, regulations,and ordinances and City policies_ Hammerschmidt will
obtain all permits, licenses, and certifications necessary to ensure compliance with all
federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances.
9. Hammerschmidt shall promote The Bridges, and advertising will be considered a separate
line item in the budget. Any increase over the approved budget for advertising must be
approved in writing by the City.
10. Hammerschmidt shall develop and maintain systems to insure adequate internal controls
and accurate and timely reporting of financial information. Such systems are subject to
the review and approval of the City's Finance Director.
11. Hammerschmidt shall maintain an adequate level of staffing at all times in order to
service the golfing public. •
CARISX129390
Mt3125-33 3
Lt/Et 39Vd 0tEEGEEZt9'QI N3A1Y2i9 '8 AQ3NN331'WO2i3 tt ' Gt 46-17O-d39
12. Hammerschmidt shall be responsible for the operation of the pro shop at The Bridges and
will be responsible for providing the usual services for the sale and repair of golf
• equipment.
13. Hammerschmidt shall provide all customary services provided by a golf professional,
including, but not limited to, the following:
a. Making reservations for tee times in accordance with reasonable policies developed
by Hammerschmidt and approved by the City.
b. Collecting fees for the use of the facilities, equipment and merchandise.
c. Establishing starting times and acting as a starter to control the play on the course.
d_ Recruiting and hiring golf rangers,and providing them with training,assigning and
scheduling their work, and monitoring their performance.
e. Scheduling tournaments and leagues, and maintaining a master engagement book
showing all tournaments and league play.
1. Ruling on disputes as to golf rules, regulations, and etiquette in the play and use
of the golf course.
g. Maintaining the pro shop in a neat and orderly condition at all times and operating
the pro shop in a manner so as not to bring undue criticism upon the City.
h. Stocking and selling golf merchandise, equipment and supplies, and keeping golf
clubs and other golf equipment in good repair.
i_ Offering individual and group golf lessons to the public.
14. Hammerschmidt shall be responsible for issuing and collecting proper green fees so that
only players possessing a valid receipt use The Bridges golf course.
15. Haznmerschmidt shall be responsible for daily cleaning of the clubhouse interior.
Hammerschmidt shall at all times keep the clubhouse in a clean and sanitary condition and
shall comply with all federal and state health laws and regulations.
16. During the normal golf season, Hammerschmidt shall keep the clubhouse open from
sunrise to sunset, except when the golf course is closed to public use. The clubhouse may
open earlier or remain open later depending upon special events, but only within legally
allowable time limits. Hammerschmidt shall conduct the operation of the clubhouse in
such a manner so as to not bring undue criticism upon the City. Hammerschmidt shall
not permit the sale of beer or non-intoxicating malt liquor in a manner contrary to any
law or ordinance or the provisions of any applicable liquor license or permit.
Hammerschmidt shall operate the clubhouse in strict conformity with all federal, state,
county, and city laws and ordinances.
17_ Hammerschmidt shall at all times have in plain view at the clubhouse a price list or
printed schedule of prices of all available commodities and services. All prices shall be
competitive with similar establishments within the service area.
I S. Hammerschmidt shall take necessary steps to maintain an adequate number of personnel
• to cover all operations of The Bridges during the minimum hours of operations.
CARLSKI29390 4
MII125-33
t/bI 39tld OteszeczI9'QI N3Atf210 'S AC3NN3N=WOad ZI = LI L6-b0-d3S
19. Hammerschmidt affirms that to the best of his knowledge, his involvement in this
Agreement does not result in a conflict of interest with any party or entity which may be
affected by the terms of this Agreement. Hamrnerschmidt agrees that, should any conflict •
or potential conflict of interest become known to him,he will immediately notify the City
of the conflict or potential conflict.
The Citv's Duties and Responsibilities. The City agrees to do the following:
1. The City shall make all debt service payments, as required by the golf course bond
covenants, and ensure adequate funding for agreed upon capital improvement projects to
the extent revenues from The Bridges are available for such projects.
2. The City shall approve an annual budget including operating and capital outlays and base
salaries and maximum incentive pay for golf course employees by December 31 for the
subsequent year. Included in the budget will be the prices for all categories of green fees,
driving ranges, leagues, and golf cart rentals. In no event will these prices be reduced
unless by agreement of both parties.
3. The City shall permit the use of specialized equipment owned by the City for special
projects on the golf course, provided that Hammerschmidt provides adequate advanced
notice for scheduling of such equipment.
4. The City shall establish an advisory committee to make recommendations to the City •
Council regarding operations at The Bridges. The committee will be comprised of the
Mayor, one City Council member or a person appointed by the City Council, the City
Clerk-Administrator, and the City Finance Director.
ARTICLE IV: TERMINATION
If Harnmerschmidt fails to perform any of the terms, conditions, or requirements of this
Agreement, the City will give Hammerschmidt thirty days' written notice of such failure. After
receipt of the written notice, Hammerschmidt will have up to thirty days to correct the problem,
except that the City may in any case take immediate steps to correct the problem in order to
protect the health, safety and welfare of the city and the public prior to the end of the 30-day
period without affecting the city's right to terminate Hammerschmidt. If Hammerschmidt fails
to correct the problem within the thirty-day period, the City may terminate the Agreement by
giving Hammerschmidt thirty days' written notice of such termination. If this Agreement is not
renewed at the end of any three-year term, for any reasons other than for cause, Hamrnerschmidt
shall have the right to continue as an employee of the City in the position of Golf Course
Superintendent under the same terms and conditions as all other employees and subject to the
same procedures for termination of other City employees and Hammerschrnidt's compensation
shall be established annually by the City Council for the position of Golf Course Superintendent
with no inclusion of incentive pay.
If the City fails to perform any of the terms, conditions, or requirements of this
Agreement, Hammerschmidt will give the City thirty days' written notice of such failure. After
GARSSK129390
Mu125-33
Li/SI 39'dd 0tEBLEEZt9'CI N3AVMO '8 AQ3NN3N°WO2id Zt ' Lt LE-60-d3S
•
receipt of the written notice, the City will have thirty days to correct the problem. If the City
• fails to correct the problem within that thirty-day period, Hammerschmidt may terminate the
Agreement by giving the City thirty days' written notice of such termination.
ARTICLE V: OTHER PROVISIONS
1. Addresses and Notices. Any notice permitted or required to be given under this
Agreement must be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if sent by certified
mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
To the City: City Clerk-Administrator
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
To Hammerschmidt: John Hammerschmidt
If either party has a change of address, that party must give written notice to the other
party of such change. Failure to do so will not invalidate any notices sent to the
addresses listed above.
• 2. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
3. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the City and
Hammerschmidt with respect to the matters addressed herein.
4. Amendment. This Agreement may be modified or amended only with the written
approval of the City and Hammerscbmidt.
5. Construction. In the event that any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, or
any application thereof, shall be found to be invalid, illegal or otherwise unenforceable,
the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions in any application
therefor shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.
6. Assignment. This Agreement shall be binding upon and in order to the benefit of the
parties. No assignment or attempted assignment of this Agreement or any rights
hereunder shall be effective.
7. Authority. Each of the undersigned parties warrants it has the full authority to execute
thio Agreement.
8. Waiver. No failure by any party to insist upon the strict performance of any covenant,
• duty, agreement, or condition of this Agreement or to exercise any right or remedy
consequent upon a breach thereof, shall constitute a waiver of any such breach or any
GARLSK1Z939O 6
11.1125-33
Li/9I 39/d OIES4EEZt9:CI N3[1'd'10 '8 AQ3NN3 :WO2i3 Et ° Lt LB-b0-,335
other covenant, agreement, term, or condition, nor does it imply that such covenant,
agreement, term, or condition may be waived again.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
By
Duane McCarty, its Mayor John Hammerschmidt
By
Chuck S. Whiting, its City Clerk-Administrator
S
•
CARLSK129390
7
MU125-33
LI/Gt 3DVd 0tc6LCCZi ar N7AVMO '8 xa3NN7M.W(N.. hi = 1.1 /.R-60-a7a
411
Duane McCarty, Mayor
Charles S.Whiting,City Clerk Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Robert C. Long, City Attorney
•
•
CARLSK3.28657
MU125-33
GL/£ 30Hd 0L£61..££ZT9°CTT nt=nwxn v xin=m r=v:r.Tnv.r 001 : J T
Item No. l I E
Staff Report No. q7- 2.2/I
Meeting Date: September 8, 1997
. Type of Business: CB
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jennifer Bergman, Housing Inspecto(V';�j
Item Title/Subject: First Reading of Ordinance No. 603, •1 Ordinance Amending Section
1005.12 of the Mounds View Municip.1 Code Entitled"Housing Code"
Date of Report: September 5, 1997
Summary:
Attached is Ordinance No. 603 which amends Chapter 1005.12 of the Mounds View Municipal
code addressing the registration of multiple family buildings (see Attachment 1).
Currently, the Code requires the City to inspect all multiple family buildings including owner-
occupied townhouses and condominiums and owner-occupied units. At the May work session,
Council directed staff to draft an ordinance which would remove the requirements of registration
from owner-occupied units and include all multiple family rental units.
•
"Multiple Dwelling" in the Housing Code is defined as "a building or portion thereof containing
two(2) or more units." By this definition, all duplexes,townhouses and condominiums would be
required to be inspected and registered annually regardless of whether they were owner-occupied
or not.
In order to limit the inspections and registration to only those units which are renter-occupied,
the Ordinance states that the "Multiple Dwelling" shall be defined to include the definitions of
"Dwelling, Multiple" and"Dwelling, Two-Family" listed in Sections 1102.36 and 1102.39 in the
Zoning Code (see Attachment 2). By adding these definitions to the registration requirements,
the Ordinance would include all rental units in buildings with two or more units, but exclude the
owner-occupied townhouses, condominiums and duplex units. The Ordinance also states that the
registration and inspections requirements apply only to non owner-occupied units.
•
ATTACHMENT 1
ORDINANCE NO. 603
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW .
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO MULTIPLE DWELLING REGISTRATION AND AMENDING
TITLE 1005, SECTION 1005.12, SUBDIVISION 1 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE.
THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Title 1005.12, Subd. 1 of the Mounds View Municipal code shall be amended to read:
1005.12: MULTIPLE DWELLING REGISTRATION:
Subd. 1. Certificate Required: No person shall allow to be occupied or let to another for
occupancy units in a multiple dwelling for which a certificate of registration has not
been provided by the Building Inspection Department. For the purposes of this
Section 1005.12 of the Mounds View Municipal Code only, the term"multiple
dwelling" shall be defined to include the definition of, and have the same meaning as,
the terms "Dwelling. Multiple" and"Dwelling. Two-Family" as set forth in Section
1102.02, Subd. 36 and Subd. 39 respectively of the Mounds View Municipal Code
except that"Dwelling. Two Family"units shall only be applicable to non owner-
occupied units.
SECTION 2.
This ordinance takes effect 30 days after its publication.
Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 8th day of September, 1997.
Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 15th day of September ,
1997.
Duane McCarty, Mayor
Charles S. Whiting, City Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM: •
•
Robert Long, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT 2
1102.02 1102,02
. Subd. 35. DWELLING, MOBILE HOME: A detached residential dwelling unit designed for
transportation after fabrication on streets or highways on its own wheels or on flatbed or
other trailers and arriving at the site where it is to be occupied as a dwelling complete and
ready for occupancy, except for minor and incidental unpacking and assembly operations,
location on jacks or other temporary or permanent foundations, connections to utilities and
the like. A travel trailer is not to be considered as a mobile home.
Subd. 36. DWELLING. MULTIPLE: A building designed with three (3) or more dwelling
units exclusively for occupancy by three (3) or more families living independently of each
other.
OMMIIMa
Subd. 37. DWELLING, SEMI-DETACHED: A dwelling which is joined to another dwelling
at one side only by a party wall.
Subd. 38. DWELLING, SINGLE-FAMILY: A detached dwelling unit designed exclusively for
occupancy by one family.
Subd. 39. DWELLING, TWO-FAMILY: A dwelling designed exclusively for occupancy by
two..( ) families living independently of o er, so own as ouble bungalow,
duplex, side-by-side two-family dwellings.
• Subd. 40. DWELLING UNIT: Residential accommodation, including complete kitchen
facilities, permanently installed, which are arranged, designed, used or intended for use E.
exclusively as living quarters for one family and not more than an aggregate of two (2)
roomers or boarders. Where a private garage is structurally attached, it shall be
considered as a part of the building in which the dwelling unit is located.
Subd. 41. EFFICIENCY APARTMENT: A dwelling unit consisting of one principal room
exclusive of bathroom, hallway, closets or dining alcove.
Subd. 42. ESSENTIAL SERVICES: The erection, construction, alteration or maintenance of
underground or aboveground gas, electrical, steam or water transmission or distribution
systems, collection, communication, supply or disposal systems by public utilities,
Municipal or other governmental agencies but not including buildings.
Subd. 43. FAMILY: One or more persons, each related to the other by blood, marriage or
adoption, or a group of not more than four. (4) persons not all so related, together with
their domestic servants or gratuitous guests, maintaining a common household and using
common cooking and kitchen facilities.
Subd. 44. FLOOR AREA (For the purpose of determining off-street parking and off-street
loading requirements): The sum of the gross horizontal floor area of the various floors
of a building measured in square feet and from inside walls, with the area devoted
• primarily to storage, aisles, fitting rooms, off-street parking and/or loading not included.
(1988 Code §40.02)
City of Mounds View
4 I N T E R
MEMO
OF F ICE
To: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator
From: Jennifer Bergman, Housing Inspecto
Subject: Housing Inspector Job Summary
Date: September 5, 1997
Listed below is a summary of the majority of job responsibilities as the Housing Inspector for the
city of Mounds View. Instead of a detailed listed, I provided a brief overview of each category.
If you have additional questions, please let me know.
Housing Replacement Program
In 1996, the Mounds View Economic Development Authority (EDA) created a Housing
. Replacement Program to assist in the removal of substandard houses. The program was designed
to reduce the blighting effects of dilapidated homes and replace them with new, higher valued
houses.
Since its creation, the EDA has purchased and demolished two substandard homes. The EDA is
currently in the process of selling one of the lots to a developer for the replacement home which
is proposed to be a three-bedroom,two-story home with an approximate value of$140,000.
First Time Home Buyers Program
Each year the City of Mounds View submits an application for the Minnesota Cities Participation
Program (MCPP) through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA). The program
provides funds for mortgages for first time home buyers. The program is administered by
MHFA and City approved mortgage lenders.
The program provides qualified first time home buyers with a 6.75% fixed-rate, 30 year
mortgage. In order to qualify,the buyers must have maintained a good credit rating, purchase
the home for under$95,000 and have an income less than$43,650. According to the St. Paul
Realtors Association, 98 homes were purchased for under$95,000 in 1996.
The funds for the 1997 First Time Home Buyer Program will be available until October 18,
• 1997, or until all funds have been exhausted. The 1998 MCPP application will be due in
February.
Chuck Whiting, City Administrator
Page 2
September 5, 1997
Property Manager's Coalition
The Property Manager's Coalition is a joint coalition between the cities of Mounds View and
New Brighton. It was established to address issues regarding apartments and to assist in the
communication between the City and the property owners/managers and develop Crime Free
Multi Housing properties. This is a cooperative effort between the Community Development
Department and the Police Department.
The first meeting was in April, 1995, in which we had 8 people attend. The meetings now
average between 25 and 30 people. The meeting provides an excellent resource for property
managers and owners of rental properties ranging from 2 to 400 units. Many property managers
have commented on the helpfulness of these meetings. It also provides an arena in which to
bring property managers information on various activities occurring within the City.
Each month, prior to the meetings, a newsletter is created and mailed to each multi-family
property owner. The newsletter addresses issues related to property law, rehabilitation programs,
crime free multi housing and inspections.
•City Inspections
• In order ensure compliance with the Housing Code, the City Council requested that staff inspect
all multiple dwelling units within a four-year period. This inspection program began in 1995,
and we are currently on the third year of this rotation.
Each year, a letter is sent to each property owner notifying them of the date and time of their
inspection. In addition, they are sent a list of units that have been inspected in previous years and
asked to select units which are not listed. We have approximately 1,400 units in the City of
Mounds View ranging from duplexes to a 385-unit apartment complex.
HRA Inspections
The Metropolitan Council HRA contracts services with Mounds View to conduct their Section 8
inspections. Section 8 is a program which provides a subsidy to low-income families which can
be used at any apartment throughout the metropolitan area if the landlord agrees to accept the
subsidy. In order for rent to be paid to the landlord, the apartment must pass a Housing Quality
Standards inspection.
We conduct 75-100 inspections for the Metro HRA annually.
•
• Chuck Whiting, City Administrator
Page 3
September 5, 1997
Housing Rehabilitation
Community Development Block Grant/HOME Grants: Each year the Department of
Housing and Urban Development(HUD)provides Ramsey County with an allotment of
CDBG and HOME funds. These funds are available to cities within Ramsey County on a
competitive basis. When the applications are released, staff sends out letters to all
multiple family property owners to encourage them to apply for the funds. We are
currently working with Greenfield Estates to assist them with their application which will
be due in January, 1998.
A portion of the allocated funds Ramsey County receives are placed into two revolving
loan funds: (1) a single-family rehabilitation programs; and(2) a multiple-family (for
properties with 2 to 8 units) rehabilitation program. Each year staff markets these
programs through newsletter articles and letters to multiple family property owners.
First Tier Suburbs Planbook: A collaborative effort between several first-tier suburban
cities is being made to create a Planbook. The purpose of the Planbook is to provide
ideas, inspirations,tools and encouragement to homeowners and to promote the
advantages of living within the inner-ring suburbs and inspire homeowners to remodel
their homes. The Planbook will address specific housing styles such as the cape cod,
rambler and post-war homes and provide ideas on how each style of home can be
upgraded to meet the needs of today.
First Tier Housing Rehabilitation Program: On behalf of the first tier suburbs, the City of
Fridley submitted to Minnesota Housing Finance Agency a proposal to create a specific
housing rehabilitation program which would address the needs of the first tier suburban
communities. This program is in the initial stages, and it is hoped legislation will be
passed to support it.
•
II F
COW O
QUIRDS
•o Phone: (612) 717-4000
P�A Q 5Ve Fax: (612) 784-3462
S
udress • Partners"
September 9, 1997
Richard Jopke
17117 Round Lake Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55346
RE: Offer of Employment
Dear Rick:
I am pleased to confirm the offer of employment to you for the Community Development Director
position with the City of Mounds View.
• As discussed with you last week,the proposed salary and compensation package is as follows. Your
starting salary will be at Step 4 which equates to$59,590.65. Advancement to Step 5 will occur one year
upon your anniversary date. Annual Compensation Adjustments(ACA)will be consisted with other
non-union employees.
You will receive a balance of ten days sick and vacation leave with a vacation accrual rate of ten days
during your first year of employment. Thereafter,your vacation accrual rate will follow the City's
personnel policy. You will be reimbursed for car mileage consistent with the IRS rate.
Your starting will be determined upon commencement of this letter.
We look forward to your employment with the City of Mounds View.
Sincerely,
Chuck Whiting
City Administrator
cc: Lynnette Morgan
•
-6 PRINTED WITH
2401 Highway 10•Mounds View, MN 55112-1499
SOY INK TM
recycled Paper
Equal Opportunity Employer