Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packets - 1994/07/05
. r w AGENDA JULY 5, 1994 COUNCIL WORK SESSION 7:00 P.M. 1. Discussion Regarding: (per Councilmember Quick) a. Highway 10/35W Ramp Metering b. County Road J/Highway 118/Airport Drive Interchange 2. Discussion Regarding Surface Water Management Permitting and Role of Rice Creek Watershed District (Mike Ulrich) 3. Discussion Regarding Police Department and City Hall Parking Lots (Mike Ulrich) 4. Updates: a. Long Lake Road (Paul Harrington, Mike Ulrich) b. Westminster Senior Housing Project (Samantha Orduno) c. Greenfield Ponds (Harstad)- (Paul Harrington, Mike Ulrich) AGENDA PAGE TWO JULY 5, 1994 5. Discussion Regarding Grant Proposal and Purchase of Park Land and Development (southwest section of the community) - (Mary Saarion) 6. Discussion Regarding Liquor License Fee Structure (Tim Cruikshank) 7. Discussion Regarding Directional Signs on Hillview (per Councilmember Quick) 8. Discussion of Development Review Request of Wolf and Associates (Paul Harrington) 9. Discussion of Request for Major Subdivision, Citywide Developers (Paul Harrington) AGENDA PAGE THREE JULY 5, 1994 10. Discussion of Request for Extension of Conditional Use Permit, Church Upon the Rock (Paul Harrington) ITEMS REQUESTED BY MAYOR FOR TABLING TO WEDNESDAY, JULY 6, 1994 1. Long Term Financial 2. Update on Compost Site a. Discussion Regarding Policy for Use of Chipper (per Councilmember Quick) 3. Discussion Regarding Resident Survey (tabled from June Work Session) AGENDA PAGE FOUR JULY 5, 1994 4. Role/Expectations of Code Enforcement Activities (Per Councilmember Quick/Paul Harrington) a. Cars for Sale b. Sign Ordinances 5. Discussion Regarding Role/Expectations/Goals for Police Department a. Traffic violation enforcement (stop signs, speed limits) b. New programs c. Expectations 6. Council Protocol (per Councilmember Quick) 7. Council Rules of Procedure (tabled from June Work Session) AGENDA PAGE FIVE JULY 5, 1994 EDA WORK SESSION JULY 6, 1984 1. Discussion of EDC Applications (Cathy Bennett) 2. EDA Meeting Schedule (Cathy Bennett) 1. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: STAFF REPORT 94-1220 Report Number.: 17.7 AGENDA SESSION DATE July 5, 1995 Report Date: 6-30-94 DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion Regarding.: Highway 10/35W Ramp Metering; County Road 3/ Highway 118/Airport Drive Interchange Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report -4111* - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) ,SUMMARY; Since the construction of new Highway 118, several citizens have voiced their concern for the safety of the intersection of County Road J, Highway 118 and Airport Drive. Due to the multi-jurisdictional affiliation of this situation, representatives from the affected governmental units have been invited to this work session to discuss a possible resolution. The representatives that will be present are: Dan Soler, traffic engineer from Ramsey County; John Olson, Engineer from Anoka County; and Charlie Hurdlich, Engineer from MnDot. In addition, Rich Lau from MnDot's Traffic Management Center will be present to discuss the rationale, study and impact on the City by adding meters to the on ramp of 35W southbound from Highway 10. Oic10(14 Tim Cruikshank, Asst. to City Admin. RECOMMENDATION; 3. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: v 'nv 94-1222WS STAFF REPORT Report Number: _ C�Vr AGENDA SESSION DATE July 5, 1994 Report Date: 6-30-94 DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion Regarding Police Department and City Hall Parking Lots ,),\ Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report L1, L - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; Staff, has been working on design of the Police. Dept. parking lot in the hopes of developing a plan to fit the new and existing conditions of the buildings, and within a reasonable budget. Jim Hess has designed and redesigned the facility many times and has now produced a plan that has addressed the concerns of the party's involved. Included with this parking lot is an additional site for off street parking on Edgewood Drive, north of the police drive and south of the water treatment plant. With the ever increasing need for parking space at city hall, staff concurred that if feasible, this additional lot should be constructed at the same time. This would alleviate some congestion at city hall during council meetings and softball games. Jim is meeting with Steve Campbell from SEH to discuss any comments or corrections on Wednesday and will have an estimate ready for Tuesday's work session. It is important to proceed with this project ASAP, as it directly effects the reconstruction of the ballfield to the north of the driveway. Funding for this project is suggested to come from account 100-4270-705 , the Silver Lake Woods account. Michael Ulrich, Public Works Director RECOMMENDATION; REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 4•A ONu STAFF REPORT Report Number: 94-1223WS ;N AGENDA SESSION DATE July 5, 1995 Report Date: 6-30-94 DISPOSITION Item Description: Update on Long Lake Road Administrator's Review/Recommendation. - No comments to supplement this rep. _ _%i . u - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supple.:•nt sheet .• necessary.) SUMMARY; The following is a brief update on the Long Lake Road reconstruction project: Sidewalks have been poured along the entire length of the project and the only remaining work is boulevard restoration which will include sodding/seeding of grass areas and planting of trees to replace those which were lost during the course of the construction. Trees will be replaced on up to a 2 to 1 basis. A landscape contractor has been awarded the job and work is expected to be completed by late July, early August. According to Ramsey County, the final wear course of bituminous and striping of the Road itself is scheduled to be completed within the next 3 to 4 weeks. If you have any additional questions, please call. r Paul Harrington, Communiy Development Coordinator RECOMMENDATION; REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 4.c_ CURDS 94-1225WS STAFF REPORT Report Number: AGENDA SESSION DATE July 5, 1994 Report Date: 6-30-94 DISPOSITION Item Description: Update on Greenfield Ponds Administrator's Review/Recommendation: 11014 i - No comments to supplement this report ` - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; I have scheduled an on-site inspection of the Greenfield Ponds Development with Catherine Harstad to review the punch list which was made part of Development Agreement 92-97 . A verbal update of that inspection (to be conducted on July 5) will be provided Tuesday Evening. • ,� .. r rte-- Paut Harrington, Communityelopment Coordinator RECOMMENDATION; REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 5 IIVOS Report Number: 94-1226WS STAFF REPORT 6-30-94 Mil AGENDA SESSION DATE July 5, 1994 Report Date: DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion Regarding Grant Proposal and Purchase of Park Land and Development Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report AA: 72/l4 - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) ,KUMMARY; Staff is preparing a grant proposal for the acquisition and development of property for a park located in the south western quadrant of the city, Woodale and Pleasant View Dr. This land is owned by Mr. Belisle who is agreeable to selling the land to the City for a park. The land is 3 acres and abuts backlots of homeowners properties on the north and east side of the property. Woodale Dr. is the south border and Pleasant View Dr. street easement is the west border. There are mature trees located on the west border. The land is level and upland and clear, quite conducive to park facility development. The appraisal of the land is $25, 000 per parcel or $50, 000 total. Development plans indicate a paved parking lot which can be duplicated for a basketball court, four square and other court games during the daytime when cars would probably not be parked in the lot. A large multi-age accessible playground structure with additional swings would be located at the park. In addition, a multi-purpose ballfield which would be used for t-ball, 8-ball, and youth softball as well as soccer and perhaps flag football would be developed. Park amenities would include benches, picnic table and grill, park rule signs and park identification sign, trash receptacles and landscaping. Parking would accommodate approximately 14 cars off street. The park is easily accessible to the residents living west of Silver Lake Road and south of Hwy 10 . Residents who live in this quadrant can walk drive or bike to the park without crossing any major roads. The area is located in a residential area. s --.; ;;Ae!,C0-27 Mary Saarion, it c arks, Recreation and Forestry RECOMMENDATION• STAFF REPORT PAGE TWO JULY 5, 1994 The Outdoor Recreation grant is a 50% matching grant. The push is for development of park acquisition proposal to ensure that the land is used for recreational purposes. The grant can be funded over a 3 year period. Therefore, park acquisition can be funded one year and development the next year. This is indicated on the 1995 capital improvement budget proposal and the 1996 Long Term Financial Plan. The grant will require a commitment from the City Council for the 50% matching funds for 1995 acquisition and 1996 development phases. The grant will be indicating $50, 000 for acquisition and $68 , 000 for development for a total project amount of $116, 000 or $58 , 000 match; $25, 000 for 1995 acquisition phase and $34 , 000 for 1996 development phase. A public hearing is required for the grant proposal. Also a letter or resolution from the City Council approving the grant proposal and matching grant funding is required. Staff wishes to discuss this grant proposal with the City Council at the work session to ensure that this is something that the Council wishes staff to pursue. The grant is due August 1, 1994 . a rough concept map is attached as an idea of the proposed park layout. 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 7-5/94 90:00 •1 ~, STAFF REPORT Report Number: s.. AGENDA SESSION DATE July 5, 1995 Report Date: 6/30/94 DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion Regarding Liquor Licensing Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report J - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplemen sheets as cessary.) SUMMARY; At the June, 1994 Council Worksession, five fee options that were developed with the three proprietors affected by the. City's on-sale with cabaret liquor license were presented to the Council for direction. At that time, Council directed staff to look further at the option that would base the liquor license fee on square footage that is primarily bar area and square footage that is primarily dining area. To determine the closest true cost possible for administering the fee, staff used the average cost of a police call to one of these establishments ($35/hr. x 1. 5 hr = $52 .50) plus the cost to administer the license and other indirect costs such as prosecution services ($2 . 50) for a total average cost per call of .$55. The Police Department provided staff with the number of calls for last year to help determine the total cost per establishment based on calls. Since it is impossible to determine what areas of an establishment drew police calls, for calculation purposes, 75% of the total calls were used for bar area and 25% for dining area. The total cost of servicing each establishment was then divided by the square footage of the bar area and dining area which yielded the multiplier used to determine the fee (multiplier x square ft. ) . The cost per call for the dining areas was reduced by 50% because less liquor is consumed in these areas. Following are the calculations for each establishment. 4's 0.41,011)( Tim Cruikshank, Asst. to City Admin. RECOMMENDATION: DONETELLES BAR AREA • $55/call x 10 calls/yr. = $550 • $550/891 sq. ft. = $. 62/sq. ft. • $.62/sq. ft. x 891 sq. ft. = $550 DINING AREA • $27. 50/call x 3 calls/yr. = $82 . 50 • $82 . 50/4280.4 sq. ft. = $. 02/sq. ft. • $.02/sq. ft. x 4280.4 sq. ft. = $82 .50 NEW TOTAL FOR DONETELLES = $632.50/yr. OLD TOTAL FOR DONETELLES = $6,984/yr. ROBERT'S BAR AREA • $55/call x 76 calls/yr. = $4, 180 • $4, 180/7, 262 sq. ft. = $.58/sq. ft. • $.58/sq. ft. x 7,262 sq. ft. = $4,180 NEW TOTAL FOR ROBERT'S = $4,180 OLD TOTAL FOR ROBERT'S = $8,639.70 MERMAID BAR AREA • $55/call x 251 calls/yr. = $13, 805 • $13, 805/18,292 sq. ft. = $.76/sq. ft. • $.76/sq. ft. x 18,292 sq. ft. = $13,805 ! ' DINING AREA • $27. 50/call x 84 calls/yr. = $2310 • $2310/2243 sq. ft. = $1. 03/sq. ft. • $1. 03/sq. ft. x 2243 sq. ft. = $2,310 NEW TOTAL FOR MERMAID = $ 16,115/yr. ($ 10,000 cap) OLD TOTAL FOR MERMAID = $ 10,000 cap POLICE CALLS FOR JUNE 1993 TO MAY 1994 Budget Liquor - 2577 Highway 10 (off sale) I CALL NETWORK Liquor - 2345 County Road H2 (off sale) 12 CALLS MURZYN• LIQUOR - 2850 Highway 10 (off sale) 0 CALLS BEL RAE BALLROOM - 5394 Edgewood Drive (wine) 21 CALLS DONATELLES - 2400 Highway 10 (on-sale) 13 CALLS ROBERT'S OFF 10 - 2400 County Road H2 76 CALLS MERMAID INC. - 2200 Highway 10 335 CALLS • I "--i— c./ Oa c.‘ __ cc. (. co c6 , \ 0 ' _ _______ --* 3 — ,...D ..... 4 Qc) 2 . . 4.. ...)" .c) ..,- -,-- coo • .,, . CS 7,T --..) i1 A • - - - - - - - - r .4., ...0 . * . . C3 . ) '. & ' :3 ur, ,.... ril ' •-:;) 1, . f . . vl cc.I ) i. ..r. 1 CZ .1. 1 ‹. .... ) \ . . --- .-:\ i v--7 \Pt -- \..'.I''' "-- `11- ‘ ---) <-" ...... , . -- (1,...k ri- . c.,1 4--, z... ,'..-- 1 I Z i 71c c,..... ( ___.2. (: . • I ,.;•-' 1 --F.' 1 N .... rn i --, 1 1 1 ct. ks- 1-------7 1--4 — , , 0 — .- , `2.4._ I v,,, '...0, .•••.- 1"--\ = CkC • — --- . —.i I i . ---- •-....4 (- . . Si- ,c77 .13 -4— ct •,9 CZ C) , 4•', • (X) 11 CI: it CC '•1() j c-- 14 .rn CA-* 4 i —f- , r----- ts, 1-- — ' .c• + 't • "----:- '7(9)7415 . q •,-' 0 .„.. . - . 'c'4:-. ..•• to C _ 1.r it _A00 1 j ',7)li1:00 I In (-C fl r 41 -_. *1- :--,-. 14911741 '3.1 N. , ,3 ...)-, S. •4,-- e--.... 0 ..... Lti. c . ul 1---- ry-- ,,,- rs 3-...' ..s L, 9 11,s OS r"-- . -,, --- c( • — CI Y..) ... . \--.\—\ fi_ . 1 A ,..... -.'") I .#•-• - & ,..) Ks--, — -- --T 1-6 c'S (-€ i - 5-) —2 sil c--6 — c< VC) --t---- -,) ci— 4--•---------_____.. *1-) ‘i . t_n .._ . i 1 .3" — . (q) \A) CI) r1--- C- 1 '.... If-1 '' ... i 'zif- CN ,.1 1.--,-- -..9 1 „so •,-),-.D r•(),Ite‘ - T , .... ' J ,,.. . c., cc, R w I-- < -a i--- . '. ..—_1, J-• 42. -----1 -\---\-) Cr ',Xs) ---. 111 1--, ca.t. It-- 8. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 94-1228WS STAFF REPORT Report Number: —'i0 AGENDA SESSION DATE July 5, 1994 Report Date: h -94 DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion of Development Review Request of Wolf and Associates Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; John Purves, representing Wolf and Associates, has made application for a Development Review to allow the construction of a 9,566 square foot addition to their existing facility, at 4860 Mustang Circle. Staff has reviewed the request and found that, as proposed, the development meets all requirements of the Municipal Code as it relates to setbacks, parking, land use, etc. Provision for the handling of storm water runoff on the site was addressed in 1991 when a similar proposal was approved by both the Planning Commission and the City Council. In addition to the facility expansion, the applicant is also requesting that the easement for the former water tower site immediately adjacent to the subject property be vacated so that it can be utilized for storage area. Staff has had preliminary discussions with the Director of Public Works regarding possibly vacating the easement. I will forward his recommendation on Tuesday evening. The Mounds View Planning Commission has completed their preliminary review of this item and has directed Staff to prepare a resolution of favorable recommendation to be formally acted upon at their July 6, 1994 meeting. I have included all materials received as part of this submittal for your review. Staff only received one site plan - it will be available Tuesday. / ( aui Harrington, Communi Development Coordinator RECOMMENDATION; 5229 `'5220 `- tiry • , sz 1 5220 Cr 5210 5215 5210 "VI' ryryh '5200 5209 5200 ti E _ o o.4- 0° dikihn - N N N N N N N N N N 1 N On tio` nMN ti <,..,,,r, Z 4 �Grillik° .4 6' • R�oE W RICE..- CREEK 11 0 M a, n hr> M NNN N N N RD H 0111:41# . . — in Q 4 w V -' w ''i by. z 5� TOWNS EDGE TERRACE 111T _ • ..,.......,... q 94 7. MOBILE HOME PAR uIcJc-r% • 0 I 6 ,..„, • z 4860 `L 4825\ 4 �. 4821 4889 Z 0 - '7.1. 4830 \ m 4822 4815 •820 rn a, \ 4809 •818 CD '' 4801 4800 N ' -2- N 4751 , MUSTANG DRIVE co•:•..Z. C..1- V 4761 , 4759 •:•:,Z {;•; 4751 :•::D 4749 ......................................;::: UNIMPROVED ROAD 35/24/94 09:50 FAX 612 784 3462 CITY OF MV 41002/002 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION. APPLICANT: Wolf and Associates, Inc. Phone 780-4550 ADDRESS; 4860 Mustang Circle, Mounds View, MN 55112 Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code Interest in Property (check appropriate box); ❑ Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee, Operator, Manager ❑ Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other (explain) Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before find City action of this request. PROPERTY INVOLVED: Address/General Location 4860 Mustang Circle, Mounds View, MN 55112 Legal Description or Property Identification Number Lot 3,Block 1, Mounds View Industrial Park No. 3 ' Legal Owner: Name/Address_ Arlin A. Wolf 2170 Lakebrood Drive, New Brighton, MN 55112 Present Use (check appropriate box): ❑ UndevelopedNacant ❑ Single Family Dwelling ❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling Multi-Family (No. of Units ) ❑ Business/Commercial Establishment Ej Industrial Establishment ❑ Other (explain) Property Classification: Mj Abstract ❑ Torrens REQUEST: Approval of building expansion and acquisition of City Land on which the City Water Tower was formerly located. oer Attachment A. *Please note: Applicant may be responsible for additional fees associated wi. %= review •.f this request I HERESY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUE. -gi41r . .. -+110"- •nature **Yr* 'ae*********k*****,M7e,e7F****]t********1ttX7t7C*****:rs***lrislr***** 1t ye*7e*•h R**Irle-grIr*www-X1rTiewir:#vrt Rezoning $200/acre.minimum$200,maximum $1.000 P- d Dedication Fee • Variance R-1 to R-2-$75.all others$200 Date Paid ji5Conditional Use Permit R-1 to R•2•$75,all others 5200 Receipt Number Cade Appeal $75 ,- • 14--5Develop.dSite Plan Review $100/acre,minimum 100.maximum $500 Total Fees Paid •Q 1—t• �' • 1 `�j �TNinor Subdivision $150 Date Paid fc Major Subdivision $250 plus $250 deposit Receipt Number 4+_' ! 7 if Comp. Plan Amendment $200 Wetland Alteration Permit $50 plus deposit determined by Staff Additional Fee Paid Wetland Buffer Permit $10 Date Paid Planning Sign $50 - Receipt Number PUD $350 PUD Amendment $150 Data of final action APPROVED 0 DENIED [� TABLED ❑ Date 7•2'-/ q Planning Case No. 3 (F - (I 41 Admin.Account No. Attachment A CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION Request for Building Expansion Wolf and Associates, Inc. seeks to expand its present production facility at 4860 Mustang Circle, Mounds View, MN 55112. The company designs, engineers and manufactures bulk material handling systems, large conveyor systems, for industries such as pulp and paper, resource recovery, power generation and mining. Presently, the company does about 25% of its fabrication at the Mounds View facility. The remainder of the fabrication is subcontracted to fab shops throughout the metro area and the United States. A primary objective of the expansion is to increase the level of in-house fabrication to 50%. Two years ago, a 50 foot expansion of the facility was approved by the city. Because of economic constraints, Wolf and Associates put that expansion program on hold. We now seek to move ahead with this objective. At issue in this proposal are noise considerations as they may affect the residents in the neighboring trailer court. Currently, Wolf does receive complaints of noise, especially during its second shift, because of the proximity of this residential area to an industrial zoned facility. Although noise from the facility has been found not to violate city statutes, Wolf does seek to be a good neighbor and is interested in helping to alleviate this problem. The expansion proposed takes the noise issue into consideration by pushing the building out 100 feet rather than 50 feet. This would accommodate a truck drive through lane inside the building and eliminate doors on the north side of the building. The solid wall of the building adjacent to the trailer court would then serve as a noise barrier between production and the residential area. In addition, loading trucks inside the building rather than outside would help to reduce noise significantly. Such a building design would necessitate truck travel on the Fast side of our building. Currently this area is used for parking and steel storage. To make this design feasible, Wolf seeks to acquire the parcel of land on which the city water tower formerly stood. This would give us additional space for inventory and vehicle storage and accommodate truck traffic and additional parking requirements for the expanded facility. Wolf has discussed obtaining the water tower plot of land in the past. In those discussions the City has also expressed interest in obtaining an easement on the west end of the property to establish an emergency access to the trailer home park. We feel both of these objectives could be accommodated in conjunction with the building expansion. The expansion under consideration would create new jobs and promote economic development in the City of Mounds View. Accordingly, the project meets the guidelines for an economic development grant through the State of Minnesota. Wolf and Associates has retained the services of a consultant specializing in this area to work with state and local officials for the purpose of writing the grant request and obtaining the funds. The effect of these efforts would be the establishment of a permanent revolving economic development fund for the City of Mounds View. The fund would enable Mounds View to help other local businesses expand in the future. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 9. STAFF REPORT Report Number: 94-17�9WS ORSHOS Report Date: 6-30-94 11119( AGENDA SESSION DATE July 5, 1994 DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion of Request for Major Subdivision, Citywide Developers Administrator's Review/Recommendation: -.ow - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; Ken Sjodin, representing Citywide Developers, has made application for a Major Subdivision of the property indicated on the attached map. The proposal calls for 17 single family lots to be located northeast of the Spring Lake Road/Highway 10 intersection. The proposed development would be partially serviced by a cul-de-sac to be constructed at the expense of the applicant. Staff has reviewed the proposal and found that it meets the general intent of the Municipal Code. Two items do need to be addressed: 1) The size of a proposed lot on the corner of Spring Lake Road and Highway 10; and, 2) The possible need for storm water control ponding to service the development. Updates on both of these issues will be provided on Tuesday evening. The Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed this item and is scheduled to take formal action on the request at their July 6, 1994 meeting. Staff will be providing copies of the Preliminary Plat, Grading and Utility Plans on Tuesday evening. 7 .� P6u1 Harrington, Commun kDevelopment Coordinator J FLCOMMENDATION; Staff seeks Council direction on this matter. • 8374 8370 '8371 I 8368 8382 83 8377 8368 8369°D 8360 8355 8368 8371 8368 8351 8346 8365 8354 8345 8364 CL 8360 8360 W 8359 ALL 8347 8360 8344 8351 8346 8335 8340 8350 8355 8344 8358 8340 8335 8331 8334 8343 8342 8325 8312 8345 8334 0 8330 8335 8336 8325 p 8339- 8335 8332 8315 8300 8330 3 8333 8330 8333 8305 8290 8320 8325 8316 8315 8322 p 8321 8300 8285 8280 8310 8315 8311 8308 Y 8311 = 8275 8270 0 8300 8305 8312 8297 8298 8301 GROVELAND 8265 8260 w: 8289 8285PARK 8255 8250 8284 8285 8290 , 8280 8275 8281 8250 8261 n ^ to W fL" 8270 8265 8230 8241 ro 630C N 8240 8270 8265 '— N N ARDAN N N N N 8230 8260 8255 8248 - --"'"412114161.111 J num N N N N N a y 8250 a 8245/ 01 — f:;/ © iia,.~ co n N N ^ 8220 8240 PLE.4 8233 822:' .245 - 8210 82' 823 8235 F., 8213 8217 8202 Lo �1 v v g20C 0 8198 ` <N ^ n <N 25 8198< 8201 N N N N 4:22 :.'7 8191 8192carat. , DR 814 8200 w � • N • co co - „icJ • 3 8180 8175 8160 " 62dd N Nh. N NN 614E F 17 St6q / 8148 pY RT 003 815E 8138ter�� 8142 ` 00" 815E _' {/�J^) 8132 8127 > ^ / U M 1- �A Ii of �A N M c,'') • O �O a N M Mffl m co ap co rN n n NJ �. 8101 N N N N N N N ,(''''l N • N N Bos. ,; m ^ co N 80cc 80 • N N ry. O- 8060 8065 8084 8085 8070 N 18030 8075 8060 .• T o 8030, 8046 8036 8045 8040 w • N pi !025 8026 8025 8028 CL_ �� 8016 - 8015 LL Z 8000_8005 8016 �'• 8005 7990_ 7985 8004 798• 7975 7970 Y 7960 O o ti Q Li N Q M 7960 7965 co r4,..) 7950 7955 7956 i CO el-N 7934 7933 7950 N 7932 JO �i a v 7897 O N N N 17900 792• f NfLL�tn's, —0 1791: N N 7830 0 7835 7890 7887 M n 0 7880 co 7861 co m ,n 7820 C 7825 7880 7879 i co 7814_, 7815 7870 7865 0 Lo 7860 7835 N co 780• 780 7860 7851 o 7850 7821 c^' 0 C.7 - \ 0pp ry N. m 7850 a 7841 rn m 1780C 7801 �' 0 N N N cn x OAKWO0D DR O 7791 ��a° 7834 7821 7786 7781 7750 7768 7769 7780 7775 7758 7759 7770 pb ti^ 7748 7749 7768 7767 7765 7738 C 7739 7729 - 7755 p O 7801 C 7728 3 7729 7728 7723 tcCt,r' Y-1 7730 rtag a G 7p 7719 7718 7715 a37720 • 771Crn 7710 7709 7710 7711 N 7700 n• C 9• 7665 7692 /1:---"---."'•••- ,......Q'.: ........... CO . m 7686 7685 N 76927682 7690 p N 7680 p 7669 7670 7663 7680 w N N 0 a 7675 y 0 0 0 0 i� 7670 7665 7660 ") ") n ,n7655 7666 7647 7644 7653 • • 7633 7664 7629 7634 7635 7.829 = 7620 7625 7620 Y s-a�S a.la ..r�.v., s3..atrr ar t+' v r Y 4� � .xY �` 'k.,��::a�s�3ax�_.� �T:�r _ ^e.r•,as,a«�_ e._ " ,7'�t.9ttif _ _.� � �•.�4.aai� ���3 .F$.�3i�,Yd,n�:� CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION APPLICANT: G',Ty h/r cic -4/2 •v // _..- ii Phone 7�1d-'6 ADDRESS: t"7H/ O,ry,!ral 4r"'�� 6 0.,ii /f/,/ �3 Street Address, City, State, and-Zip Code Interest in Property (check appropriatebox):.;:,' ,� El Owner of Property - ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee, Operator, Manager: Agreement to Purchase • ❑ Other (explain)" = Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before final City action of this request. PROPERTY INVOLVED: Address/General Location A Y , /D • .4110..i!Ay .e'-ill .J10 14- Awa d an d &.1,'i u-,-.1- 'n I A 0-7j Legal Description or Property Identification Number j- ?7a„6,1,! 16r 70 7-4 is .P/o, Ii - re 0-27 Legal Owner: Name/Address ii Present Use (check appropriate box): • UndevelopedNacant (rnGLadzs onx 9),17/c ,.a.'./y dw�8/??ID ❑ Single Family Dwelling ❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling ❑ Multi-Family (No. of Units ❑ Business/Commercial Establishment ❑ Industrial Establishment ❑ Other (explain) Property Classification: ❑ Abstract Ii3 Torrens REQUEST: MaiAir5/e`.!'1 tirsi1h 67:: .1-0 77....4 *Please note: Applicant may be responsible for additional fees associated w.h t revpvv of this requ t. p r�-[�fi•- I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUE (RR-Iv!, PA- ,c, Signa e ******************************************************************************************** Rezoning $200/acre, minimum $200,maximum$1,000 Park Fund Dedication Fee Variance R-1 to R-2-$75,all others$200 Date Paid Conditional Use Permit R-1 to R-2-$75,all others$200 Receipt Number Code Appeal $75 Develop./Site Plan Review $100/acre,minimum 100,maximum $500 Total Fees Paid _ 0.0 0 Minor Subdivision $150 Date Paid --)/ - r Major Subdivision $250 plus $250 deposit Receipt Number ,,, 321k, Comp. Plan Amendment $200 Wetland Alteration Permit $50 plus deposit determined by Staff Additional Fee Paid Wetland Buffer Permit $10 Date Paid Planning Sign $50 Receipt Number PUD $350 PUD Amendment $150 Date of final action • APPROVED ❑ DENIED 0 TABLED 0 Date Planning Case No. s4g- t q 4- Admin.Account No. _ - __,171t`i a h To'A n 5 e-y? /�/ �S !3�u�,di r al C1 Y� Corr Rapvi/g1/t/ /7/u DG30�3�yoo31� liw 0 _3, 23a yd0 �- L . �Grar ✓ . G� c 5 Ti K 8/G/ a/n it, A;.<chrA' Rei /`euit 5 Yz i/?,c/ oG3 , 3. 3 oof'� 5a r G,IGB y /o/,Stia,kai4 /1T/1/ p/,/ ,o 3o.2>.33Doay 1arin4 Kali l 'n Fin / //U /`-7a-addf /7/d ti4/ eYu3o �331 O 73y V✓�/ -y-4v r n 5 o .29,25- i+ij/ /O e f; d s 1/i�.✓ P�w } .3 ) ob3� ? 10. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: DUNES MY STAFF REPORT Report Number: 94-1230WS AGENDA SESSION DATE July 5, 1994 Report Date: 6-30-94 DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion of Request for Extension of Conditional Use Permit, Church Upon the Rock Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report -410, - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) [IMMARY; Church Upon the Rock, 7901 Red Oak Drive, has made application for an extension of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the continued use of a temporary accessory structure on residentially zoned property. The applicant was originally granted a Conditional Use Permit for the accessory structure by the City Council. Passed in 1988, City Council Resolution No. 2320 contained a "sunset" clause which effectively revoked the permit after a five year period. Last year (1993), the City Council granted a one-year extension to the C.U.P. The attached letter more fully explains the applicants current request. For review: In 1988, the Planning Commission and the City Council gave approval for the location of a temporary accessory building at 7901 Red Oak Drive (Resolution No. 2320). At the time of approval, both the Commission and the Council had concerns about the available off-street parking area on the site, the lack of an improved surface for those existing parking facilities and, the proposed use for the accessory building. In order to somewhat address those concerns, the approval for the temporary structure included the aforementioned sunset clause. The specific language of the Resolution stipulated that the temporary structure he removed after a five year period and replaced with a permanent building. Additionally, at the end of this five year period, the site (i.e. parking facilities and surface) were required to be upgraded to meet current City codes. The concern with the use of the building was addressed in a separate resolution. In September of 1993, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 4409 which, in part, extended the Conditional Use Permit to July 1, 1994. At this time, the applicant is requesting that an additional extension of two (2) years be granted to allow more time for the Church to assess its needs and options in relation to the site. The Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request and is tentatively scheduled to take formal action on the request at their July 6, 1994 meeting. I have provided all other materials received as a part of this request in addition to all documents referenced in this memorandum. f e Poul Harrin ton Community D elopment Coordinator RECOMMWN1 ATION: Staff seeks Council direction on this matter. UJTJ """" OJJy ---- y 8336 O---- _. 8335 8332 8330 8325 O 8315 8300 8303 8310 a 8305 8310 8321 8330 8333 8330 8333 8305 8290 8295 8290 E.8291 8290 • 8285 L 8320 83258316 8315 8322 O 8321 8300 8285 82808281 8310 8311 8308 Y 8311 8287 8280 Z 8280 >" 8298 = 8275 8270 0 8281 8270 H 8271 8270 ii ' 8273 8300 8305 8297 8301 GROVELAND cc W , 8289 8285 PARK z 8265 8260 cx 8273 8260 8261 8260 8265 8284 —�_ 8255 8250 8280 8281 • 8250 8261 N _ ,o 8267 - 8250 8251 8250 8255 J 8230 8241 '" a 330C ao N v 8240 8261 8240 M m v 8241 8270 / 8265 ^ N N N N N N N 8230 8255 ^y N N N N o�� 8231 ARDAN AVE8248 9260N -,-7-715-7---0 m 8250 a m N 0 0 n n ^ v 8220 ' I l' N N N N N N N PL 8.06 N 8210 8211 8205 8227 CPir 0 ^� w ,t 320C 8184 8193 / 8205 / N N N N 4: 2 • m - O 8203 DR 8180 8185 J : •/ Z N r` a�8 03 �o 1 8175 8171 n .0 ./ W0.21,__________''' '° N 8200 N N '� ". 8165 m �1�_ 8160 _ .0 O LAPORT N NN 814E 8155 d� 8150 8165 /•117 74' 8142 8145 jjL _LI_L 8135 S. 6, mss, j 8140 8141 8127 81251 8130 i7 813 R I1I> W M N n °1 N n °) N N n " P. M O H111a •• M NN N O cN° ON <NN NNN812a 12N N N 1 N NO : / : // SHtRWOOD CO o m a° m o :0' N N N N---"-- _ N N 8080 6081 Ce N N 8088 8075 co co 8099 03 0 8085 8071 :0.0 8065 8084 8070 8071 8066 8071 8068 Calcv8040 - 8075 8060 8059 8050 8055 8060 8065 80462 J, 8030 8045 ' 8045 8040 8042 8045 8052 8051 8026 8025 8028 8039 8032 8033 8040 8035 ‘0 8036 :0 0 8025 8016 8015 8025 8018 8011 8000 03 8016 8021 Z �'0 8005 _ 8000-8005 8009 8006 7990 7485 8004 7981 7990 0 7981 7990 0 7989 , 8 m A, 7980 a 7975 7970 7980 7969 7980 7979 rn 'lQ N. 7960 7965 797- 0 7959 70 7965 " m N N 7950 7955 :56 LT 7949 7• 7959 7966 7969 N <0 V 794. 7945 7946 7927 co m 7934 7933 7950 7432 7930 NI 7933 7930 7917 rn `DLn M�tL RD I 7897 7920 jO N I- N '900 7401 ` 7900 N N 7900 7401 N ¢ ao 7918 N 0'4,N, 7830U 7835 7890 7887 ro m ti�� F 7886 0 7891 N 7880 7895,03 CO 1 C11- N '' 7861 N N N - 7820 Y 7825 7880 7879 7880 co om > 7885 7866 7867 7865 0 7860 7835 N o 7876 Z 7810) 7815 7870 m Z 7854 7851 :0:�O c 7850 N 7870 O 7877 7805 7860 7851 0 7821 0 7842 m 7850 Z 0 I - 7801 ti� , 7863 7841 EE• 7841 p nri N N 780C ->B AO 7830 O vei x 0AXW0 DR p 7791 ,�D'° 2� 7851 00 L, Q ti °� 7820 781s i 7821 `b 7810 783 0 778 7781 7750 '776:Z 7769 7780 7809 .® 7800 7775 7758 7759 7770 78017748 77497768 7767 o 0 Pd SOD tibbh 40110,^ 7767773=G 7739 7729 Q titi7761 7755 772:3 7729 7728 7723 7801 7755 t 7730 Spring Lake 771:0 7719 7718 7715 7720 �y°� 7745 � 0rf�tir Z a9 771C ti N 7710 Y 7709 7710 7711 N 7700 • 7715 ..: ,.. . 2222.. °0 ' 7692 lit ••••::::c4.. m 7686 7685 °N° 7692 7685 7690 9: 2585 v : p to N 7680 CC 7682 m CO M N t° O O 7675 7669 7670 7663 7680 W * " N 7670 7665 7660 M Mo oM M 766( 7655 7666 7647 7644 76530 + Dc° coti 7630 7633 7664 7629 7634 7635 N 7624 7620 7625 7620 ° h� 7629 7614 7600 7611 _ 7627 7600 7619 7601 7so4 SILVER VIEW 7581 7584 7581 7580' 7585 7594 7575 N 2 oN 7576 7588 PARK N°E NO, ". Gti N ° 7555 7564 7565 7556 p 7565 7584 O 7565 75607570 " N ° N T CO M 3 7555CC 7546 7555 7572 7555 ma= ;ao$ 7545 ack an n. .max K z It 4 - s � — , '— � t..>• CHURCH UPON THE ROCK 7901 Red Oak Drive NE Mounds View,MN 55112/612-786-9555 Gordon Steck Senior Pastor May 16, 1994 Mounds View Planning Commission City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 RE: Extension of Resolution No. 4409: Resolution approving conditional use permit for a temporary accessory structure to be placed in a R-1 District at 7901 Red Oak Drive, Church Upon the Rock. Dear Commissioners: Church Upon the Rock respectfully requests a two-year extension of City of Mounds View Resolution No. 4409 granting a special use permit for a temporary accessory structure at 7901 Red Oak Drive. The accessory structure is being used by Church Upon the Rock and Northside Christian School for classrooms and is essential to both. This requested extension is necessary because our plan to relocate to the Rice Creek Center in New Brighton failed to be approved by the City of New Brighton and has forced us to sell that property and look for a new location. We are presently negotiating a purchase agreement with a buyer on the New Brighton property which includes the acquisition of land in the City of Blaine. However, this will require a new building plan and all the subsequent approvals by the City of Blaine as well as time for construction. • Therefore, we request this two-year extension of Resolution No. 4409 to give us the time we need to work through this relocation process. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, AJim410, \ejti Gordon Steck Senior Pastor GS/nm Jesus said,"Therefore everyone who hears these words of Mine,and acts upon them,may be compared to a wise man,who built his house upon the rock.And the rain descended,and the floods came,and the winds blevg and burst against that house;and yet it did not fall,for it had been founded upon the rock." Matthew 7:24,25(NAS) RESOLUTION NO. 2320 CIT; Or ;MOUNDS VIE' COUNTY OF RAt1SEY • STATE OF t1INNESOTA • RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE .PERMIT FOR A TEMPORARY ACCESSORX' STRUCTURE TO BE PLACED IN AN P.-1 DISTRICT AT 7901 RED OAK DRIVE, CHURCH UPON THE ROCK WHEREAS, the Church Upon the Rock , 7901 Red Oak Drive, has requested a conditional use permit to erect a temporary classroom in an R-1 District; and WHEREAS , this structure will be tr,:ated as a temporary accessory structure with a six foot setback from the principle building except for a temporary passageway connecting the two buildings;- and WHEREAS, this temporary structure will be allowed on the property for a time period not to exceed five years from City _ Council approval provided that the use as a classroom does not . change; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Coun., .i of the City of Mounds View approves a conditional use permit to for the erection of a temporary classroom not to exceed five years from City Council approval for Church Upon the Rock, 7901 -Red Oak Driver legally known as Spring Lake Park Hillview, Lots 113 and 114, contingent upon the follow! n!i; f 1 . After the five-year time period , the temporary structure is to be removed and a permanent structure put in its place requiring the site and building to be brought up to Code, pending approval by the City Council . 2. If the principle building is sold ,-r vacated, the conditional use permit for this structure becomes invalid and the structure would he removed . Adopted this 25th day of April , 1988 . ATTEST: Aiir",111! L-.i . , .. �� tt-�%or (SEAL) (-)( r ez -Ad' inistrat••r '4464 RESOLUTION NO. 4409 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A TEMPORARY PORTABLE CLASSROOM FOR CHURCH UPON THE ROCK, 7901 RED OAK DRIVE PLANNING CASE NO. 366-93 WHEREAS, Church Upon the Rock has made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the continued use of a temporary portable classroom at 7901 Red Oak Drive; and WHEREAS, In 1988, the Mounds View City Council gave approval for a Conditional Use Permit for the placement of a temporary portable classroom on the property; and WHEREAS, the approved City Council resolution con- tained a "sunset" clause, which effectively revoked the permit after a five year period; and WHEREAS, the current request is in response to the sunsetting of the previous approval; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval in Resolution No. 365-93 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the requested Conditional Use Permit for the location of a temporary portable classroom for Church Upon the Rock, 7901 Red Oak Drive, contingent upon the following: 1. The approved temporary portable classroom shall be removed from the property no later than July 1, 1994 . 2 . The parking lot and driveways on the property shall be surfaced with City approved materials no later than October 1, 1993 . Resolution No. 4409 Page Two 3 . The exterior of the principal building and the temporary portable classroom shall be painted no later than November 1, 1993 . 4 . The area under the portable classroom shall be paved following its removal from the site. Adopted this 13th day of September, 1993 . ATTEST: - ,or (SEAL) ,764 Clerk-Ad inistrator :,',7 Agenda Section: 2. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION I INDS 94-123 2WS STAFF REPORT Report Number: M 6-30-94 AGENDA SESSION DATE July 6. 1994 Report Date: DISPOSITION Item Description: Update on Compost Site — Discussion Regarding Policy for Use of Chipper Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY: Attached please find the Ramsey County Work Plan for the Maplewood and Mounds View Yard Waste Site Searches. Maplewood has one site and has asked Ramsey County to find an additional site for their community. ' Zak Hansen and I have been in communication on a weekly basis regarding the alternative site search for Mounds View. He is still working with TCCAP and MnDot for potential sites. One of the approaches that was briefly discussed during the early stages of trying to find a workable solution to the City's on-going costs for hauling brush and other materials off the Ardan site was the possibility of leasing the land to the County for a noaninal amount and allowing the County to assume all responsibility for operating and maintaining the site. While the City could certainly impose very definite, but reasonable, restrictions on the operations and maintenance requirements, it would alleviate the on-going costs the City is experiencing and continue to provide a service to the community while, at the same time, allowing the City time to develop a planned approach to the development of Ardan Park. From very preliminary discussions with Zak Hansen, it appears that the County would be receptive to this concept. The wood Chipper has arrived. Councilmember Quick has requested that the Council discuss and develop a policy on its use. Staff is seeking direction in the concept of leasing Ardan Park to the County fo a time period as yet undefined. Amiga - _ r_ I / Sama tha Ord no, C 'ty Administrator RECOMMENDATION; JUN-27-1994 09:47 RC SOLID IJASTE 612 633 0571 P.02 WORK PLAN FOR MAPLEWOOD AND MOUNDS VIEW YARD WASTE SITE SEARCHES (revised 6/6/94 ) PURPOSE Maplewood Identify a yard waste composting and/or transfer site(s) that could augment the Maplewood site. Mounds View Identify an alternative yard waste composting and/or transfer site(s ) that could replace the Mound View site. OVERALL APPROACH 1 . Two-pronged approach: -' a. Process of elimination 1 . Within entire search area, apply criteria whereby yard waste sites are prohibited 2 . Apply other criteria to evaluate remaining areas b. Identification by governmental entities (cities, County departments, etc. ) of specific sites that may be available GEOGRAPHIC AREAS OF SITE SEARCHES Maplewood East: County line South: Larpenteur Avenue West: Dale Street, as extended northward to County Road G-2 ; Centerville Road north of Birch Lake Blvd. North: County Rd. G-2 extended east to Centerville Road; north County line between Centerville Road and .east Co. line Mounds View East: Lexington Avenue South: In New Brighton - I-694 in Arden Hills - Highway 96 West: Pleasantview Drive (County line) North: County Road J (County line) CRITERIA 1 . Prohibited areas a. Zones in which yard waste composting or transfer sites are specifically prohibited by municipal zoning requirements or land use plans b. Areas already developed or with specific plans to be developed, per information provided by cities JUN-27-1994 09 46 RC SOLID WASTE 612 633 0571 P.03 r c. Prohibited by restrictive covenants (e.g. , certain Ramsey County Open Space property) c. Less than one acre of active site area, excluding buffer area, access road, and firebreak d. Active area would be within 300 feet of a residence or retail establishment (defined as a building, accessory structures such as a patio, driveway, or parking lot; not defined as the property line) e. Two-lane entrance road not feasible f. Active area would be in a statutory wetland 2 . Evaluation criteria for remaining land a. Site characteristics 1 ) Size and configuration: how much yard waste could be composted or stored on site 2 ) Slope 3 ) Run-on/runoff 4 ) Soil types 5 ) Distance to water table 6 ) Distance' to surface water b. Buffer 1 ) Visual (e.g. , trees, berms ) 2 ) Distance to other land uses a) Residential b) Commercial/businesses c) Hospitals/nursing homes c. Wind directions in relation to surrounding land uses d. Utilities 1 ) Water 2 ) Electricity e. Traffic 1 ) On-site 2 ) Off-site 3 ) Convenience a) Access to site users b) Distance to site users 4 ) Weight limits 5 ) Emergency vehicle access 6 ) Equipment access f . Transfer site potential as one level or two-level site g. Cost 1 ) Purchase/lease cost 2 ) Site development costs 3 ) Operational costs h. Permits needed i. Availability GENERAL TIMELINE 1 . Identify site search areas (where yard waste sites are not prohibited) and specific potential sites under governmental control 6/1 - 6/17 JUN-27-1994 09:48 RC SOLID WASTE 612 633 0571 P.04 2 . Identify specific potential sites within site search areas 6/20 - 6/22 3 . Evaluate all potential sites, and rank them into categories of low, medium, and high potential 6/23 - 7/6 4 . Develop more detailed information (e.g. , costs ) for high potential sites 7/7 - 7/14 5. Draft reports on alternative siting 7/11 - 7/19 6 . Internal review 7/20 - 7/22 7 . Submit final draft report to Maplewood Community Development Office for review 7/25 8 . Submit final report to Mounds View 7/29 TOTAL P.04 5 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda section: 4 cams STAFF REPORT Report Number: 1111, AGENDA SESSION DATE July 6, 1995 Report Date: 6-30-94 DISPOSITION Item Description: Role/Expectations of Code Enforcement Activities Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report i - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) ,SUMMARY; As requested, the following is an—overview of the job responsibilities of the Planning Associate, Joyce Pruitt and a brief update on her current activities. The primary responsibility of Joyce's position (75% - 80%) will be to enforce Zoning, Sign, Parking, Nuisance, etc. Codes which have been adopted by the City Council and are part of the Municipal Code. Examples of the positions' duties would include: assuring all land use regulations are being met, control of the location of off-street parking and ensure that improved surfaces are being used for such, regulation of home occupations and items for sale within residential and other districts (i.e. cars for sale, equipment for sale) , general enforcement of Nuisance Ordinance (garbage, debris, weeds or other rank growth, etc. ) . The position is responsible for responding to citizen complaints and proactively correcting violations which are observed during the course of regular "patrolling" . Additional, but less emphasized, responsibilities of the position would be to keep abreast of planning issues within the City so that in the event the Community Development Coordinator is unavailable to the public, Planning Commission or City Council, this position could fill in as Staff liaison to those groups. Also, it is anticipated that Joyce will assist the Community Development Coordinator to some degree on planning related studies and projects. Currently, Joyce has been involved in both reactive and proactive enforcement of the City Codes, as well as providing the Community Development Coordinator with suggestions on wording for the revised Nuisance Code. Also, Joyce has met with representatives of the City of Apple Valley to discuss the merits of a computer software package which provides for the documentation and follow-up of code enforcement issues. Staff hopes to utilize some of the ideas being used in Apple Valley to develop a tracking system for Mounds View. Paul Harrington, CommuniDevelopment Coordinator RECOMMENDATION; REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATIONillf Agenda Section: 5• STAFF REPORT Report Number: 94-1234WS AGENDA SESSION DATE July 6, 1994 Report Date: 6-30-94 DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion Regarding Role/Expectations/Goals for POlice Department Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; Councilmember Quick requested that an item be placed on the Work Session Agenda which would address the concern of traffic sign violations (cars running or rolling through them) . The on-going issue of speeding in the City and the occasional public comment that people are "doing this" or "that" and people's dissatisfaction with what they think should be done or not being done prompted a discussion of Council expectations of the Police Department. At the FOCUS 2000 Forums and subsequent Issue Project Team discussions, few, if any, public safety issues were addressed to any significant degree. At the April Council/Staff Strategic Planning Session, once again, the role of the Police Department was not discussed in any detail. Other departments were provided with clear expectations, goals and direction by the Council as to what activities, programs and services that were to be accomplished within a set timeframe. The social fabric of all communities is changing at a rapid and often alarming rate. The role of Police Departments is changing even in small suburban communities. In order for a Department to remain successful, it must have the support of the governing body and a clear understanding of that body' s expectations, reflecting the overall community standards, values and perceptions. The City's Police Department deserves no less that to receive a specific time set aside for a thorough discussion of Council appreciation of their activities, expectations for performance, and suggestion for Department activities/programs, services. . l Sama ha Ordunio, City Administrator RECOMMENDATION; STAFF REPORT PAGE TWO JULY 6, 1994 In the context of a discussion regarding enforcement of traffic laws, it may be beneficial to address the current and future role of the Police Department in such areas as: * Code Enforcement * Coordination of activities with other Departments * New programs, services, activities * Communication - is the Council receiving enough information from the Department, too much, too litlle, what information is desired? Below are suggested questions Council may wish to consider prior to the Work Session. * What are the general and specific expectations of the Council for the Department? * What does the Council feel are the areas where the Department is performing at or above expectations? * What current activities/programs/services does the Council want continued, expanded, or decreased, if any? * What new programs/activities/programs would the Council like to see initiated by the Department? * What specific accomplishments does the Council wish to see occur in the short term (1994/95) and long term (end of the decade) ? * In what areas does the Council wish to see improvement? * Is there a need for additional community input (i. e. , a survey) to determine community expectations? Other Departments had the benefit of FOCUS 2000 input in shaping their goals and objectives. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 7. InillimSTAFF REPORT Report Number: A4-123_5WS , 6-30-94 AGENDA SESSION DATE July 6, 1994 Report Date: DISPOSITION Item Description: Council Rules of Procedure Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; Jim Thomson has provided the attached letter in response to a review of the initial proposed rules of order for the Council. It is attached herein for informational purposes only. / ._- - ;-yam.,.- ,at,�- Sams tha Ordu o, Ci y Adminl trator RECOMMENDATION: HOLMES & GRAVEN CHARTERED Attorneys at Law ROBERT A ALSOP 470 Pillsbury Center,Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402 (612)337-9300 ROBERT C.LONG RONALD H.BATTY LAURA K.MOLLET STEPHEN J.BUBUL Facsimile(612)337-9310 BARBARA L PORTWOOD JOHN B DEAN JAMES M.STROMMEN MARY G.DOBBINS JAMES J.THOMSON,JR. STEFANIE N.GALEY LARRY M.WERTHEIM CORRINE A.HEINE BONNIE L WILKINS JAMES S.HOLMES WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL GARY P.WLYTER DAVID J.KENNEDY DAVID L.GRAVEN(1929.1991) JOHN R.LARSON 337-9209 — WELLINGTON H.LAW OF COUNSEL CHARLES L.LEFEVERE ROBERT C.CARLSON JOHN M.LEFEVRE,JR. ROBERT L.DAVIDSON ROBERT J.LINDALL T.JAY SALMEN June 9, 1994 Mayor Jerry Linke and City Concilmembers City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 RE: Proposed Changes to City Code, Section 105.04 Dear Mayor Linke and Councilmembers: I have reviewed the suggested changes to Mounds View's City Code, Section 105.04 dealing with rules of order for the city council. Under the proposal, the rules would be amended to state that councilmembers will refrain from making negative personal comments, such as comments questioning the motives or ability of other elected officials, staff or persons appearing before the council. The proposal contemplates that if a councilmember violates the rule, the presiding officer will have the ability to limit further comments of the councilmember until a later time when the presiding officer again recognizes that councilmember's right to address the body. A second violation during the same meeting would result in suspension of the councilmember's opportunity to participate in further debate on that item, and a third violation during the same meeting would result in the member being asked to remove himself/herself from the meeting room. The city council clearly has the authority to adopt rules of order that prohibit council members from making negative personal comments about other members. However, the proposed remedies for violation of the rule exceed the council's authority, and I therefore recommend that the proposed ordinance be revised. It is a well-established principle that members of an elected body should refrain from making negative personal comments about other members. It is also an established principle that an elected official must not be precluded from participating in matters pertaining to the governmental body, unless the member has a conflict of interest. In addition, elected officials maintain the same First Amendment rights as other members of the public. In Kucinich v. Forbes, 432 F.Supp. 1101 (N.D. Ohio 1977), the court was asked to address the question of whether a councilmember could be suspended from JJT71463 MU125-11 f Mayor Jerry Linke and City Concilmembers June 9, 1994 Page 2 participation on a matter before the city council for violating a council rule that prohibited impugning the motive of another councilmember's argument or vote. The court concluded that because the councilmember's statements were protected by the First Amendment, the council could not prohibit him from participating in the debate, discussion and vote on the matter. As proposed, the remedies for violation of the no-negative-comments rule would conflict with the principles established in the Kucinich decision. Therefore, if the council wishes to amend its rules of order, I recommend that the penalties be revised. Examples of permissible penalties range from the chair declaring the councilmember out of order to, in extreme situations, official reprimand by the city council. I would be happy to answer any further questions you may have on this matter. Sincerely, esW. Thomson JJT:jes cc: Samantha Orduno JJT71463 MU125-11 ! R REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 2. --,,`," nom^ -' Report Number: 94-1 7 71 ws STAFF REPORT ''' July 5, 1994 Report Date: 6-30-94 lir AGENDA SESSION DATE DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion Regarding Surface Water Management Permitting and Role of Rice Creek Watershed District Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; Staff discussed at previous work sessions the possibility of the City of Mounds View assuming the permitting authority of it's wetland issues, and the process that must take place prior to it. Staff spoke with Rocky Keene. ( SEH Consultant ) and requested that he develop a schedule for assuming this authority and fees related. He recommended that this item be further discussed again at a work session, to provide staff and council with the pros and cons of permitting in-house. Should council decide that the City of Mounds View will assume authority once a permitting policy is in place, a resolution stating that should be adopted and sent to the Rice Creek Watershed District. /'_ / / e:/// /, Michael Ulrich, Public Works Director RECOMMENDATION; Amy/Mr SWEN 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE,200 SEH CENTER.ST PAUL.MN 55110 612 490-2000 800 325-2055 ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION June 6, 1994 RE: Mounds View, Minnesota Miscellaneous Water Resources Services Implementation of LWMP SEH No. A-MOUND9402.00 Mr. Mike Ulrich Director of Public Works City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Mike: Implementation of the Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) requires approval of ordinances to adopt the LWMP as the water resources "law" in the City. Once the ordinances have been approved by City Council, a permitting program can be established which allows the City to have control over all drainage and wetland issues in the City except county ditches. This letter agreement outlines the tasks and cost required to have the City take over permitting authority from Rice Creek Watershed District. This cost was not included in the scope of work for completion of the LWMP. Background Ordinances adopting the LWMP will provide the City with the necessary legal authority to manage their water resources. Adoption of the LWMP through ordinances will also allow the City to permit water resource related projects and meet the requirements proposed by agencies such as the Metropolitan Council. The LWMP was completed at the end of 1991 and submitted to the City Council for preliminary approval. After receiving preliminary approval, the plan was sent to RCWD for review. RCWD approved the plan on January 7, 1992. One of the conditions of their approval was that the City complete ordinances which adopt the LWMP as the guideline document for water resources management in the City. Upon formal adoption of the ordinances, the City will have to determine if they wish to be the permit authority for water resources related projects and administer the requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991. The LWMP contains a brief explanation of the permit programs the City will need to develop. The following tasks are required to implement the Local Water Management Plan: 1. Submit ordinance revisions to City Council so they can begin the process of incorporating them into the City code. SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC MINNE-POLIS.MN ST:LOUD.MN JH/PPES`/A FILLS. s;/ MADISON. WI Mr. Mike Ulrich June 6, 1994 Page 3 H. Make final modifications to the plan and send to RCWD for review and approval (Step 5 in the amendment process outlined in the LWMP, Watershed District Approval). I. Incorporate changes into official copies of the LWMP. J. Attend Council meeting for formal adoption of the amendments (Step 6 in the amendment process outlined in the LWMP, Council Adoption). Deliverables: Copies of the plan amendments to be added to the existing copies of the LWMP. Task 3 - Permit Program A. Review, with City staff, the permit process developed by SEH for municipal clients who wish to become the permitting authority. B. Make required modification to the permit process to meet the requirements of Mounds View. C. Assist City staff in determining the cost to implement the permit program. D. Assist in preparing a staff report on the feasibility of administering the permit program. E. Attend a Council work session to discuss the permit program recommended by City staff. F. Revise permit program based on comments by City Council. G. Submit final permit program to City staff which will include a resolution which describes City permit program. H. Attend Council work session on final permit resolution • I. Attend Council meeting which passes the permit resolution. Deliverables: Summary report (10 copies) on the recommended permit program for Mounds View. Task 4 - Final Permit Forms and Information Package Prepare permit package for the City to distribute to property owners and developers. Deliverables: Permit program forms and information package in WordPerfect Format and one copy of the data. Mr. Mike Ulrich June 6, 1994 Page 5 Determine the Council work session at which the information will be provided to the Council. For Task 3: Review the preliminary permit program developed by SEH. Meet with SEH to determine what type of permit program the City wishes to develop. Determine the staff time and cost to administer the permit program. Prepare a staff report on the feasibility of the City being the LGU arrd permittee for water resources projects within the;City. For Task 4: Review the final permit package to be given to individuals with project that require permitting. Schedule We will complete Task 1 based on a schedule developed by the City. Task 2 will begin as soon as you authorize us to begin. The review of the plan should take two weeks. If this letter agreement is approved by June 3, 1994 the revision will be ready for the June 20, 1994 work session. We should be able to assist the City in preparation of a report to be on the feasibility of being the permitting authority by the end of June. As soon as we receive your authorization to proceed, we will begin the project. If you have any questions or wish to make modifications to the agreement, please call me at 490-2026. Sincerely, Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Rocky J. Keehn, P.E. Project Manager, Water Resources Department tlo c: Samatha Orduno, City of Mounds View Steve Campbell, SEH Mark Lobermeier, SEH TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL • FROM: SAMANTHA ORDUNO, CITY ADMINISTRAT'R DATE: JUNE 30, 1994 RE: INDEX FOR WEEK OF JULY 4, 1994 MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF JULY 4, 1994 • Fourth of July Holiday Council Work Session, Monday, July 5, 1994, 7:00 p.m. • Council Budget Work Session, July 6, 1994 • EDA Work Session Immediately Following Budget Work Session ITEMS PROVIDED IN THIS WEEK'S COUNCIL PACKET This Is It! Agenda ****************** ADMINISTRATOR'S SCHEDULE (Please note that this schedule is subject to change as meetings are scheduled, rescheduled or canceled. At any time Audrey, Michele, or Tim C. will have my most current schedule and a number where I can be reached at all times .) Monday, July 4 FOURTH OF JULY HOLIDAY!!! Tuesday, July 5 9:00 a.m. -12:00 Staff Meeting 7:00 p.m. - Council Work Session Wednesday, July 6 10:00 a.m. - Meeting with Managed Care Provider 6:00 - Council Budget Work Session EDA Meeting Immediately Following Council Budget Work Session Thursday, July 7 Friday, July 8 k ‘4 THlS IS IT . . . . For the Week of June 27 - July 1 , 1994 ADMINISTRATION Well, DRAFT NO. 1 of the 1995 Budget will be delivered to Council on Friday. It is the result of more hours of work by staff than any other single document in recent history. Amidst all the stressful hours, Don Brager managed to lighten our day with the Top Ten Reasons Why the City is Changing to Program Budgeting. I have included it herein for your enjoyment. Hill and Multi-Tech The Agreements on both developments have been executed. The park dedication fees from Everest for the Hill project has been received. Unfortunately, all is not complete. It seems that part of the Outlots which are included in the Hill project are encumbered in a 1988 Development Agreement in which the City provided over $8 million in TIF. Everest sent a letter to Jim Thomson last week requesting that the City release the properties from the previous development commitment. I forwarded a copy to Jim O'Meara who has some questions regarding the inclusion of the land in a previous grant of TIF. As of this writing, Jim had not received the Release form from Tim Nelson, so he is "sitting" on this issue. The bottom line may be that TIF assistance was given for a portion of the property Everest wants to include in the Hill project. If the release is granted, it may mean that the project is receiving TIF funds twice on the same land. I should have more information for you on Wednesday. Multi-Tech has begun construction on their addition! REMINDER THE WORK SESSION IS ON TUESDAY, 7:00 PM AND THE BUDGET WORK SESSION IS ON WEDNESDAY, 6:00 P.M. Mayor's Schedule Mayor Linke will not be in attendance at the Tuesday Work Session due to a prior commitment in Mankato. He has requested that the Council consider tabling several of the Work Session Agenda items to the following night's Budget Work Session. The items requested for tabling have been noted as such in the Agenda. Senior Housing Project Good news from Bob Thistle, Springsted! Preliminary analysis of the profit margins for the senior center project appear to be well within acceptable margins for this type of development. Bob will be forwarding a letter to me next week, but he feels confident that the project would meet the "but for" test for the amount of increment granted. Samantha Economic Development Economic Development Commission: I have received 10 applications for EDC participation. Eight of the applications are from residents and two from businesses. I am still working on more business participation and will have a good mix for the EDA to review at the work session. I am anxious to establish the members and would like to have the first EDC meeting sometime in July. Retention: Grant Application: I spoke to the Department of Trade & Economic Development(DTED) regarding the status the application for an economic recovery grant. Unfortunately, the funds have already been allocated to existing applications and all new applications will be put into a tickler file to be reviewed upon available dollars. Funds would become available if current applications that are being review are not approved. This news is disheartening since Mounds View's application was submitted even before the funds were appropriated. We had thought we were ahead of the game. As you will recall, this grant would assist Wolf & Associates with their expansion and start a revolving loan fund for the City. Since our situation is time sensitive, waiting for the grant funds to maybe become available is not an option. I spoke to John Purves with Wolf & Associates and they will be reviewing their options. I will keep you posted on the progress. Cathy Proactive Streetlight Plan Five of the ten proactive streetlight installations for this year will take place in the next month. The five locations are: 2149 Hillview Road, 2201 Hillview Road, 7501 Bronson Drive, 2101 Hillview Road and 7618 Edgewood Drive. All of the affected property owners have been informed and there has been no opposition to the locations. NSP will next schedule the work with their crew members and they hope to complete the five installations by the end of July. Code Enforcement On Friday, 7/1, Councilmember Blanchard, Joyce Pruitt, and I will scour the east side of the City (east of Long Lake Road) recording code violations. After this last outing, Joyce will have seen almost every street and home in the City. New Legislation On Tuesday of this week, Don Brager, Cathy Bennett and I attended a seminar hosted by Briggs and Morgan. The seminar covered several new laws that affect local governments enacted during the 1994 Legislative Session. Some of the topics include ethics in government, annexation, Tax Increment Financing, the 1994 Omnibus Tax Bill and financing development projects. The ethics in government amendment changed the law to prohibit a lobbyist or a principal from giving a gift to an official. An official is defined as a public official, an employee of the legislature or a local official of a metropolitan government unit. A local official is defined as an elected or appointed official of a county or city or of an agency, authority or instrumentality of a county or city. A gift includes money, real or personal property, a service, a loan, forbearance or forgiveness of indebtedness or a promise of future employment. An interested person is defined as a person or representative of a person or association that has a direct financial interest in a decision that the local official is authorized to make. Some exceptions to the law are political contributions, services of insignificant monetary value, services to assist an official in their duties including providing advice, consultant, information and communication with legislation and services to constituents, a trinket or memento of insignificant value, informational material of unexceptional value, food or beverage given at a reception meal or meeting away from the recipients place of work by an organization before whom the recipient appears to make a speech or answer questions, if the gift is given because of the recipients membership in a group, a majority of whose members are not local officials and an equivalent gift is given to other members of the group. Violations to this law are misdemeanors. LMC Committee Appointment Last week I learned I was appointed to the League of Minnesota Cities Improving City Service Delivery Committee and to its Government Innovation and Cooperation Sub- Committee. Our committee is charged with the responsibility of developing policy to be enacted at the federal and state level that would first be proposed to the League membership. I will keep you posted on the specific issues that are discussed. Tim C. • PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY PARKS: * Steve and Jeff spent a long time this week fixing the sprinkling system at Silver View Park. * Jeff did rough cut mowing at Woodcrest, Silver View Park and Greenfield. * Mowing, trim work and trash removal is an on-going task for the seasonals. * Lambert Park playground was hit with graffiti on the new playground equipment - found Thursday morning. RECREATION: * There is a bad rumor going around town that an 8 year old brought a 9 mil. automatic pistol to Hillview Park playground. Such bad rumors devastate the reputation of the programs. No weapons are at the playcenters, the children are behaving very appropriately and the activities have been great fun! * Over 77 children are taking a trip with playcenters to French Regional Park in Plymouth. The Butterflies also went on a trip this week to Children's Museum. * Sharie is attending lots of planning meetings for the Festival. * The theater activities plugging right along, rehearsals, set building, costuming, lighting plans, etc. CABLE TV: * Jerry is doing shooting this week for the July "View From the Mound". * Jerry will also begin to shoot youth athletic games. FORESTRY: * The crew continues to trim bushes and tend trees at the various parks, visiting one park each week. GOLF COURSE: * The Golf Course Task Force meets Thursday evening to try to come up with a name for the course. * The building foundation for the clubhouse is set. The maintenance building is enclosed, with windows. * The bridges have been set, the boardwalk is ready to be installed. * Three vehicles have been ordered for golf course operations. * Many small tools, first aid kit and other supplies are being purchased on a regular basis, ready for action. * Chad, summer seasonal, is getting the place "spiffy". Mary S. • FINANCE • Samantha and I will be looking into managed care for workers compensation. Under managed care the City would designate a state-certified managed care plan, and would require that employees receive medical treatment for job-related injuries through that designated plan. The managed care provider has a medical team that has experience and expertise in treating workers comp injuries and has treatment procedures that are designed to rehabilitate the injured employee and to get the employee back to work as quickly and efficiently as possible. The LMCIT will give cities that choose managed care a 5% credit on their workers comp premium. More importantly, managed care has the potential to enable the City to maintain its excellent claims experience and thus maintain our favorable experience modifier. • Work is progressing, although slower than Jerry Skelly would like, on the installation of the Council Chambers audiovisual equipment. All of the parts have arrived and nearly all that can be installed are. The presenters table is not finished. When it arrives Jerry will be able to complete installation of the controls which will be on the table. Don POLICE * Dave Anderson is having surgery (minor) this week. He will be back to work the 11th of July. * As you know, two new squads were recently put into service. The Problem--- They have not been converted to propane. We are having problems getting the electronic parts necessary for the conversion. Obviously, we are paying more for fuel than we want to. * The woman that is missing from New Brighton is a former Mounds View resident. We didn't have much information to help in their investigation. * Today is Bob Nelson's last day working in the office. He will begin working the squad tomorrow. Tim R. /t,_ PUBLIC WORKS Rocky Keene will be in attendance at the July 5, 1994 council work session to brief council on the steps required to prepare a permitting policy for surface water issues. Gary and Cheryl have been surveying the city to develop this year's patching contract. Results from last year's contract were very positive and affordable. Staff has many projects scheduled, and maintenance tasks remaining during the summer months, therefore rendering patching as the most attractive project for contract labor. The roofs at the treatment plants are near completion, with the tuckpointing still continuing. We are still holding out on the final payment to the contractor for the plant revisions. He still has a couple of very small items to correct before receiving over $ 13,000. I would think that would be quite an incentive! Radios were installed in the remaining staff cars last week and decals were applied this week. They look pretty good. Crowbar is finishing up his vacation this week, and Larry just started. By the looks of the vacation schedule it looks like that could be the pattern the rest of the summer. The valley gutter was poured at the intersection of Hillview and Edgewood Ct. yesterday, and have of the rip rap was secured. It doesn't appear that all items on the punch list will be completed by the deadline, although the major ones are receiving the required attention. Jim Hess has a final plan of the Police parking lot that all parties feel comfortable with and has submitted it to SEH for any comments or changes. This item is on the agenda for the July 5, 1994 council work session. I think that all of the staff is ready for this project to be complete. The reconstruction of the ballfield north of the driveway is being held up until the final grade is established on the parking lot. Mike ( COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TREE TRIMMING BUSINESS AT 8142 RED OAK DRIVE Staff received a call from the neighbor of 8142 Red Oak drive regarding the tree trimming operation which is taking place there. It seems the noise has become unbearable and the resident would like something done. The Municipal Code does not allow home occupations which, among other things, are visible from public streets (which this one is), provides for outside storage of materials or equipment (which this one does) or, violates any provision of the Mounds View Nuisance Ordinance (ditto). Staff has spoken with this particular property owner in the past and somewhat addressed the issues of the neighbor, however, other arrangements may have to be made for the operation of the business. Staff expects that both parties involved will be speaking to the Council - so I just wanted to let you know the situation. OFFICE BUILDING ON HIGHWAY 10 Just an update to the information I gave you last week: A survey crew was out to the site (south of the Wash Me Car Wash on 10) this week and Staff has received numerous calls for zoning information, water and sewer locates, building permit fees, etc. I suspect that the project is being given some very serious consideration by the property owner. I will keep you posted. Paul H. st. t TOP TEN REASONS WHY THE CITY IS CHANGING TO PROGRAM BUDGETING 10. It provides job security for the Finance Department because they are the only ones who can understand it. 9. It will drive the Department Heads crazy. 8. If it's more complicated, it must be better. 7. Some guy wrote a book about it, so it must be the thing to do. 6. Citizens think all government workers are crooks and mistakenly believe program budgeting will make them more accountable. 5. Citizens can't understand present budget, so maybe they'll understand a different type of budget. 4. The Council is just beginning to understand the present budget, so we better change. 3. Other Cities are doing it. 2. If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle them with B.S. 1. The City Administrator. said so. Don Brager June, 1994 lr REMINDER Council Worksession Tuesday, July 5th 7:00 p.m. Budget Worksession Wednesday, July 6th 6:00 p.m.