HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1994/09/07 EDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1994;:.
OUNCIL WORK SESSION
00`P11
��O W�R� SESSION �`t� I��►LL+�V�!
*** Discussion of Proposed Charter Amendment
****************************************
1. Richard Oman - Environmental Quality Commission Chairperson
2. Discussion Regarding Recycling Program and Position of Recycling Intern (per
Councilmember Trude - (Paul Harrington)
3. Discussion of Wolf and Associates Development (Paul Harrington)
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PAGE TWO
SEPTEMBER 7, 1994
4. Discussion of Nuisance Ordinance (Paul Harrington)
* Level of Enforcement on Private Property
5. Discussion of Parking Issues at Multi Family Resources (Paul Harrington)
6. Update on Housing Inventory (per Councilmember Trude) - (Paul Harrington)
7. Discussion of Subdivision Regulations (Paul Harrington)
8. Discussion Regarding the Pavement Management Program (per Councilmember
Trude) - (Mike Ulrich)
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PAGE THREE
SEPTEMBER 7, 1994
9. Discussion Regarding NSP Audit (Mike Ulrich)
10. Consideration of Assessment Policy (Mike Ulrich)
11. Discussion on 1994 LTFP
12. Update on Proposed 1995 General Fund and Enterprise Fund Budgets (Doh
Brager)
13. Discussion Regarding Liquor Licensing Requirements (Tim Cruikshank)
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PAGE FOUR
SEPTEMBER 7, 1994
14. Discussion Regarding State of Minnesota Cellular Phone Program (Samantha
Ord uno)
15. Update of TCCAP Site Redevelopment (Samantha Orduno)
16. Discussion Regarding Council/Staff Communication (Samantha Orduno)
ITEMS REGARDING EDC
1. Consideration of Marketing Task Force Resolution and Objectives (Cathy Bennett)
2. Consideration of Acceptance of Economic Development Commission 1994 Work
Plans, Calendar and Bylaws (Cathy Bennett)
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PAGE FIVE
SEPTEMBER 7, 1994
3. Consideration of Resolution Approving Appointment of Economic Development
Commission Chairperson (Cathy Bennett)
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 14.
mos
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 94-1293WS
EN
AGENDA SESSION DATE September 7, 1994 Report Date: 8-31-94
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Discussion Regarding State of Minnesota Cellular Phone Program
Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - ---,-
-
�- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
The State of Minnesota and numerous local units of government (New
Brighton, Blaine, Fridley, Roseville, Maplewood, Egan, Little Canada,
Minneapolis, St. Paul and others) have enacted an employee program to allow
Councilmembers and employees to purchase cellular communication systems
through the government pricing program.
The program is viewed as beneficial to the cities as it provides an
additional avenue by which contact can be made with employees in a timely
manner.
The attached resolution has been adopted by the communities which have
established the employee program and presented to the Council for
consideration at the September Work Session.
e---,--71 0,--`40,)(:
t
Samntha Or uno, City Administrator
•
RECOMMENDATION;
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered by and between the City of •
a Minnesota Municipal Corporation (the "City") , and an
Employee of City, (the "Employee") .
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has entered into a contract with U.S.
West Corporation for the purchase and airtime of cellular telephone
equipment; and
WHEREAS, the City, as a political subdivision of the State of
Minnesota, has elected to make cellular telephones and applicable
rates available to City Employees for personal use at the contract
prices; and
WHEREAS, the Employee will sign a service agreement with U.S. West
and, pursuant to said agreement, U.S. West will bill Employees
directly and receive direct payment from Employees for the use of said
cellular telephones; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said terms of agreement, if any such Employee
defaults on payment of such charges to U. S. West, U.S. West may
recover all such amounts due directly from the City; and
WHEREAS, the Employee desires to make use of a cellular telephone
under the terms and conditions offered by U. S. West; and •
WHEREAS, the City is willing to allow the Employee to make use of the
cellular telephone and applicable rates, under the terms and
conditions stated herein,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained,
and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
which are hereby acknowledged by both parties, the parties agree as
follows :
1 . The City grants the Employee the right to use a cellular
telephone under the discounted terms offered by U.S. West.
2 . The Employee agrees to pay all charges in connection with
the use and maintenance of said cellular telephone directly
to U. S . West or such other person specified by U.S. West to
receive such payment, within any time period specified by
U. S . West or its authorized agent or assignee.
3 . In the event an Employee fails to make payment in a timely
manner, so that the City receives notice from U.S. West of
its intent to collect such charges from the City, the
Employee hereby authorizes the City to deduct from the
Employee' s paycheck, all sums necessary to pay the amount
specified as owing to U. S. West, its agent, or assignee, •
together with a twenty-five dollar ($25 . 00) administrative
fee to cover the charges incurred by the City in processing
this payroll deduction request. Such payroll deductions may
continue until all amounts owing, together with all other
administrative fees, are paid in full.
AGREEMENT: PAGE 2
4 . Prior to the execution of any payroll deduction order by the
City, the City will endeavor to give at least twenty-four
(24) hours notice, either in writing or verbally, to the
Employee of its intent to execute a payroll deduction order.
Failure by the City to give the notice shall not invalidate
the payroll deduction order.
5 . The City shall have the right to terminate this agreement
upon the termination of the Employee's employment with the
City and require all fees to be paid to U.S. West, its agent
or assignee before issuing the Employee's final paycheck.
6 . The City shall have the right to require termination of the
use of the Employee's cellular telephone, in the event that
the Employee is, at any time, delinquent in paying its fees
for use of such telephone to U.S. West, its agent or
assignee.
7 . The failure of the City to require termination of the use of
the cellular telephone on one occasion shall not constitute
a waiver on the part of the City of its right to require
• such termination on a subsequent occasion.
8 . If the Employee defaults on payment of any charges to U.S.
West,; and the City cannot cure the default by deducting the
overdue amount from the Employee's paycheck, the City may
bring a legal action against the Employee to recover its
damages, including its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees
incurred in the action.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement on this the
day of , 1994 .
CITY OF
BY:
EMPLOYEE CITY MANAGER
•
■ ■ ■ ■
THlS IS
For the Week of August 29 - September 2, 1994
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
Well, it is good to be back and inundated with work! If I ever request a three week
vacation again, would someone just shoot me?!
TCAAP
Bruce Vento sponsored the meeting which resulted in a request for creation of a
Reutilization Committee to develop a long term plan for the reuse of the TCAAP site.
More information is in the Agenda with a request for nominations from the City of
Mounds View.
Councilmember Wuori called on Thursday with the notation that one of the key
players in any reutilization of the property had not been included in the composition
of the Committee - the school district. I called Vento's office and left a message with
Gina that the committee would benefit from having a representative of the school
district. James McKenny is Vento's aid in the TCAAP issue and will call me on
Wednesday.
Airport
Wednesday, Cathy and I met with representatives from the Metropolitan Airports
Commission and the Anoka County-Blaine regarding the City's recent position on the
air traffic control tower. I learned at the meeting that the tower has been approved
and funding allocated. The topic of the meeting centered on how the airport and
Commission representatives could work with the City to develop a plan of "peaceful
co-existence". One of the things discussed was the creation of a community
committee to develop a Noise Abatement Program similar to the one in place at
Flying Cloud Airport in Eden Prairie. MAC and airport representatives will be present
at the October Work Session to discuss with the Council (and members of the public
who may attend) the implications of the tower and other airport plans to ensure that
Mounds View is minimally impacted by planes using the airport.
Charter Commission
At noon on Thursday, Charter Commission Secretary, Julie Trude, submitted
language for the November ballot from the Charter Commission regarding term limits.
I have contacted both Jim Thomson and David Kennedy to advise me on two issues:
What are the City's rights and responsibilities regarding placing an item on the ballot
which has been determined to be outside the City's constitutional authority? and
What legal authority does the Charter Commission have to directly place an item on
the ballot?
I will have the attorney's legal opinion on these issues for the Wednesday, September
7th Work Session.
Due to the number of agenda items on the September agenda, the Mayor has
requested that the Work Session begin at 6:00 p.m.
Samantha
Wolf and Associates
John Purvis, Paul Harrington, Tim Ramacher, Cathy Bennett and myself met today to
discuss the citation for violating the City's nuisance (noise) ordinance issued to Wolf
and Associates and their request to purchase the land adjacent to their site (old water
tower site), have a 99 year lease or "swap" the land for land on the other side of their
site for a possible second access for Town's Edge. Their concern regarding the
citation is that settling the issue in court may not be in the best interests of all parties.
We agree. Paul will be scheduling a meeting with the complainant in Town's Edge,
John and staff to work out a solution to the noise problem.
In regards to the property issue, Wolf and Associates is concerned that a short term
lease agreement will restrict their future ability to sell the property. The property in
question is necessary to provide a turning radius for trucks that would enter the side
drive-thru door proposed in the expansion project. If the property, for some reason,
was reclaimed by the City, the drivethru doors would be rendered unusable. Wolf and
Associates will be in attendance at Wednesday's meeting to request that the Council
reconsider selling the property to them or providing for a 99 year lease arrangement.
Reminder I will be out of the office on Tuesday, September 6th celebrating
the Jewish New YearI thank the City Council for their kind consideration of me in
rescheduling the Council meeting.
Business Association
• I attended the Mounds View Business Association Board meeting last week.
The meeting was to discuss the direction and purpose of the association. It
was agreed to keep the association meetings very upbeat with educational
speakers, focus on the theme of local networking and work on a campaign of
"Buy Mounds View First". There will be a general election of new officers later
this year for 1995. Rich Wolens informed the board that he will not be able to
participate in the Association in 1995. He will carry out his presidency until a
new officer is elected from the general membership. The next meeting is
scheduled for October 6th, 11 :30 - 1 :30. Ron Schmidt will work on getting an
uplifting speaker.
Economic Development Commission
• The EDC meeting went as well as expected in the hallway under the emergency
lights. I was surprised that all the members showed up due to the storm but
have to remember that I'm in Minnesota now and weather is no big deal. The
elected president is Delane Welsch and Vice President Ron Schmidt. Secretary
duties will alternate per meeting. We had a lot of discussion regarding the
Business Retention Interviews. There has been some dissatisfaction with the
interviewers and the lack of notice we are given prior to the interview. The
EDC made a motion expressing their concern with the interview process and
encouraged staff to meet with the directors of the CRP to come up with some
alternatives. Samantha, Mark Malone and I will be meeting with CRP this week.
The EDC's 1994 work plan, calendar and bylaws will be presented at the work
session.
Attraction:
• I am responding to a request from Metro East Development Partnership for
15,000 s.f. of office/lab space. The company is a joint venture between two
large U.S. corporations which will extract antibodies from egg yolk. The
company is also looking in Iowa and Wisconsin.
The following is an update on some of the requests I responded to from MEDP and
NSP.
• Galagen (biotech manufacturer) - 8/17 - no decision has been made on sites.
The company is still waiting to resolve the financial end of the expansion.
• USDA Approved Facility - 7/13 - They have elected to locate in another state.
• Mfg of Auto Equip. - 8/17 - They are still looking and leasing current space
month to month.
• 40,000 - 150,000 s.f. mfg facility - 7/13 - They purchased a large parcel of
land in Washington County. This company was looking to move out of State so
at least they decided to stay in Minnesota.
• Audio, Video Company - Decided to locate in another part of Minnesota.
• 20,000 s.f. biotech facility - This was a lead from NSP. The company worked
out a deal with the Port Authority to expand in their current location.
Cathy
( PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
Mary Saarion is on vacation this week spending time with her kids until school
starts on Thursday, September 1 . She was in the office on Thursday and Friday.
RECREATION
This is the week for preparing flyers to go out to children the first week of school.
Registrations for Fall activities are steadily coming in. Once school starts,
however, they will be pouring in!
Mary took the Seniors to the Fair on the Lion's Bus on September 1 for Senior Day.
He enjoys the Fair and I don't, so it works out great.
We just did an upgrade on our registration system. A yearly upgrade is included in
our service contract with Aceware Systems. This current upgrade adds a few new
features allowing us to access information in a variety of ways.
Soccer registrations have doubled from 1993. Do you think maybe the World Cup
had something to do with that? We have so many teams this year, that we can
run the program entirely in Mounds View so kids and parents won't have to be
traveling to other cities!
Jerry and I escorted a group of 35 people (moms, dads, kids, couples) to the Saints
Game on Tuesday, August 31 . Jerry did a great job cooking the hot
dogs...everybody got full. The rain held off, but boy was it cold! Everybody had a
great time, though, so that's all that counts.
SUMMER STAFF:
* Brad Pellegrino has gotten a position as a sales representative for Metro Sales
selling copiers....working full time with benefits and
everything....Congratulations Brad!
* April Shoop will be leaving us in two weeks. April helped with many of the
clerical jobs around the office including registrations, copying, mimeographing,
answering phones and more. We will miss her!
* Bill Urbanski is back teaching school this week. Bill Norman, Mike Quick and
Brad Engen start school after Labor Day so this was their last week. They did a
great job this year keeping our parks looking fantastic. Thanks guys!
PARKS
We've had a problem at Hillview Park with kids climbing on the roof and damaging
shingles. Jeff was able to get the name of one of the children and we will be
contacting her parents.
Steve and Jeff are getting the most out of last week of summer help by having
them put in the new players' benches at Edgewood.
Sharie
FINANCE
* Don is on vacation.
* Mary is on vacation.
* Utility bills were due the 31st of August. Busy inputting into system.
* Received refund in the amount of $1,734 for workman's comp. estimated
1993.
Kitty
POLICE
* Had lunch with the Principle and Asst. Principle of Edgewood Jr. •
High this week. Procedures with dealing with the kids were discussed.
* Linda been on vacation this week, also Dave Brick left for Kansas
on Thursday and will return next Wednesday.
•
* Its football season!! Officers have Viking football cards and
are distributing them to kids. This is the twelve year of this
program.
* Its been a tough week for Police Officers. Most of our Officers
attended one or both funerals in St. Paul.
* Over the week-end, Officers arrested two suspects for stealing a
car. Also arrested was an adult male for 2nd degree assault.
Tim R.
PUBLIC WORKS
* The Public Works staff will finish cleaning up storm damage, and chip all the
brush on Wednesday the 1st. The City of Circle Pines is lending us their
chipper. Mounds View's chipper would not handle this amount of brush, and
the diameter of many of the limbs.
* A technician from SEH will be out on Wednesday to inspect the underdrain
structure in the filter vessel at treatment plant #3. There are a couple of holes in
it where sand is escaping. We don't know exactly what caused this at this time.
* Advertisement for the new skidloader was placed last week, with a bid opening
scheduled for September 2, 1994 at 10:30. This is the annual replacement of
this unit made available through New Holland / Ford.
* Curb and gutter was laid on Pleasantview Drive last week. Staff met with
Ramsey County engineers, and local residents to discuss some of the necessary
slope adjustments. Most of the residents were understanding and cooperative.
The base course of asphalt is scheduled to be laid on Thursday (weather
permitting), then the landscaping will commence, followed by the wearing
course sometime in the first part of September. The Contractor is doing a great
job on this project.
* Staff is working on a joint bid with the City of Maplewood for a new backhoe.
This purchase is contingent upon the approval of the 1995 budget. It is hoped
that by purchasing with another city, we may both get a better deal.
* Curb and gutter should be poured for the police parking lot yet this week, if the
weather cooperates. As soon as this occurs, staff will proceed with the grading
of the ballfield and surrounding landscape.
* I'll be on vacation the week of September 5th and returning on the 12th. I will
be at home most of the time, or on the golf course, hopefully, if you need me.
Mike
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
CROUSE CARTAGE COMPANY
As I told in last weeks edition of "This Is it", the Crouse Cartage Company has
made application for a Development Review for a facility expansion at 2169
Mustang Drive. Since that time, i have met with the City Consulting Engineer to
discuss storm water runoff issues relating to the project. The plan calls for adding
90,000 square feet of impervious parking area to the property. The applicant was
also referred to the Rice Creek Watershed District for review of the plans with their
officials. I received a call from Kate Drury of RCWD asking for information on the
capacity level of the ponding area at the end of Mustang Drive. She said that the
feasibility of the plan will be reviewed by the RCWD in relation to the size of that
available ponding area.
The Planning Commission is scheduled to informally review this request at an
Agenda Session immediately following their regular meeting on Wednesday,
September 7. Staff anticipates that the Council will see this item at their
September 26 meeting.
PROPERTY SOUTH OF THE BEL RAE
Staff received a couple of calls this week regarding the status of the property
South of the Bel Rae. Both were brokers who were interested in marketing the
property. Staff gave each information on the allowable uses and planning process.
Also, Staff received a call from Tony Jambor regarding the uses for the Bel Rae
itself. Tony indicated that he is considering selling the property and wanted to be
sure he was aware of all the uses for the property.
Paul H.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 2. (EDC)
STAFF REPORT
Report Number: 94-1 2 81 W S
rte``
AGENDA SESSION DATE SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 Report Date: 9-7-94
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Consideratthan of Acceptance of Economic Development Commission 1994
Work Plans, Calendar and Bylaws
Administrator's ReviewTRecommendatio.• �.
- No comments to supplement this re,ort ` �� dt%
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
At the first regular meeting of the Economic Development Commission (EDC) on August 25, 1994, the members unanimous
approved the 1994 Calendar of Regular Meetings, Work Plan and Bylaws.
Each item is attached for your review and discussion at the work session.
i
1'
Cathy Bennet g on• i c Development Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION;
6.1,L,
I,
:SL
I 1 T.,1,.-
:
Z
65Lt•
N r' •'`
L9L7 i —01 ?....
3ARIQ JNd1Sf111 a
LSLI
coati Loel
CI a19 6091,
oz9 sL9*
ZZab
co 1' 6— ' gy 1'
G
1
•:9I' 1
` � tLz9�
1 I Szel
3d I
0
,,h1.4}4:)[C] 1
/04iV
, • )1 Vd 3WOH 31180VV .
a- z. 3Ob2ib31 3003 SNMOl "
S-6''0, z ovarwrava:alaimn►: --
•
•
1<mitikrm
D °y
"� ' d213
rn '
D W
£-6 I Cid
e,... _ ____-
N III N
N
IN �D N i V I
. 1
w
s I
\ q—I
.>A3.3/A03:t2i I
UyV
S-6 I
I yOrk
1
�d
z d �7
r � �o�• 0 \''''yu HE
wJ and GOC
1
CD N
Jti
-S- 6 w 6�tiv
:',3
N V N N
^ 1 y N N N N
,4JJ 1 o p >O O
(— V Al 100ZS 6OZsioozs ••Zs10OZs
1.--•
aJ
l .�� OLZS 6LZSOLZS •LZS pLZS
0
R
pzzs 6zz6 rag cZZs OZZS Lm
n .aJ^
J •£ZS 6CZS10£Z9 6£ZSi0£ZS -i
( � 'i )Zs v sOZS •O, OZS
IZs 61104ZS 6ISOZSIr
V J -
=SZs o v A, iOSZS 65z4sZs SZs bSZS C
• 69Zs ;
(:1 31%/0001•1 09Z .4• •9Zs
V 4,-i&,2 '•LZS
0 C- J :2ZS i Ong
J
i Di rm..' rn t 1 ti 4,-1! `nen
lor
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 2.
:.'71;::::',S 94-1281WS
STAFF REPORT Report Number:
AGENDA SESSION DATE SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 Report Date: 9-7-94
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Discussion Regarding Recycling Program and Position of Recycling Intern
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report ;�.A 4-00eL
- Comments attached. W 1
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
At the request of Councilmember Trude, Staff was asked to give a brief
update on the recycling program in the City.
Since the departure of Code Enforcement Officer/Recycling Coordinator Carla
Asleson in April, the recycling activities in the City have been taken up
by a number of Staff in the Community development Department. The
Community Development Coordinator oversees the entire recycling program and
is responsible for the quarterly and year end reports submitted to the
County. Also, the CDC, along with Deputy Clerk Michele Severson,
coordinated the Clean-Up day held in April. Staff is in the process of
coordinating another Clean-Up Day in October. The Community Development
Department Secretary has been handling the awards program for recycling.
This involves receiving applications, selecting and visiting sites and,
notifying and acknowledging winners. Other Staff have been involved in the
program from time to time entering information on Lotus, answering citizen
inquiries and attending meetings.
In 1993, the County awarded the City of Mounds View approximately $25, 000
for the administration of the recycling program in 1994 . With the
departure of Carla (and the portion of her salary which was to be drawn
from the recycling account) , a surplus of funds - approximately $15, 000 -
are available in that account.
At the Strategic Planning Session in April, ideas for that surplus money
were discussed. Two main options were given serious consideration; 1) Use
the money to hire a Recycling Intern to administrate the program. 2) Use
the surplus money to help subsidize a City Clean-Up Day.
Staff is looking for Council direction on which way to proceed.
f. i
Poul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION;
I
if
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda section: 4_
f STAFF REPORT Report Number: 9'i-1283WS
AGENDA SESSION DATE SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 Report Date: 9-7-94
- DISPOSITION
Item Description:
Discussion of Nuisance Ordinance
Administrator's Review/Recommendation: l
- No comments to supplement this repot
- Comments attached.
Explanation Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
5TT (Air kRY;
At their August 17, 1994 meeting, the Mounds View Planning Commission .
reviewed the draft of the updated Nuisance Ordinance. Their comments are
as follows:
*Please note that spelling and numbering of the document will be
corrected by Staff.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
604 . 01 Subd. 3 - Be more specific. As written, this definition may imply
that beverages exceeding 3 .2% . are not included in the intoxicating liquor,
definition.
' 604. 02 Subd. 4 - Eliminate. It repeats Subd. 3 . .
604 . 02 Subd. 7 - Eliminate b and c. Put a and d in 604. 01 Rules and
Definitions.
604. 03 Subd. 1 c - Is this- applicable?
604 . 03 Subd. 1 i - Remove the word "tin" from this item (provide for a more
general definition of "cans") .
604 . 03 Subd. 1 1 - Concerned about the phrases "such quantities" and
"ordinary sensibilities" . They may be too open to differing
interpretations.
604 . 03 Subd. 1 q - Insert the word "Minnesota"' before 'State Board of
Health to . . . ' .
.__------7
L
/ gCommunity p
Pau Ha'rrin ton Deve ment Coordinator
STAFF REPORT
PAGE TWO
SEPTEMBER 7, 1994
604. 03 Subd. 2 - Felt this entire Subdivision may belong in another
area of the Code or, possibly, be a Chapter itself.
604. 03 Subd. 3 a - City currently clears all sidewalks - is this
provision necessary?
604. 03 Subd. 3 d - Add "outside" after 'The' and before 'piling' .
Eliminate "within the City" at the end of the provision.
604. 03 Subd. 3 h - Looking for Council direction on this one.
604 . 03 Subd. 3 i - Replace "original value" with "fair market
value" .
604. 03 Subd. 3 m - Replace "whose wheels or tires deposit" with
"that deposit's" .
604. 03 Subd. 3 cc - Eliminate items iii and iv as these conditions
already exist in certain parts of the City.
604 . 04 Subd. 2 b - Looking for Council direction on item iii.
604. 06 Subd. 1 - Eliminate item b. Replace definition in item c
with definition from 604. 07 Subd. 1 e.
604 . 06 Subd. 3 c - Item i should be in bold (it was added) . Word
item ii as follows: "Vehicles which are parked or stored outside
shall be on an improved surface as defined in Title xxx, Chapter
yyy, Subdivision zzz of this Code.
604.06 Subd. 3 e - Eliminate this item.
604. 06 Subd. 4 - Planning Commission does not want "grandfathering"
to occur. Would prefer amortization of the existing non-conforming
uses.
604. 06 Subd. 5 - Felt this item should be at the end of 604 . 06
because it is an enforcement procedure (I know what you're saying
-it is at the end of 604 . 06 - please see the next item for an
explanation) .
604 . 07 - Planning Commission felt that the items and provisions
contained in 604 . 07 were related to those in 604. 06 and therefore
all of the 604 . 07 items should just be a continuation of 604 . 06.
604. 07 Subd. 1 - reletter the definitions as follows: a becomes c,
b becomes d, c - e, d - a, e - b.
STAFF REPORT
PAGE THREE
SEPTEMBER 7, 1994
** At this point, the numbering of the document gets very
confusing. I apologize for that and, will try to keep things as
clear as possible from this point on. As I stated earlier, the
numbering of the document will be done following review. For
reference purposes I will continue to use the numbers as currently
written.
604. 07 NOISE CONTROL - Put Subd. 3 in 605. 00 ENFORCEMENT. As was
the case in the vehicle section, the Planning Commission felt that
this subdivision was an enforcement mechanism and should be
included in that area of the Ordinance.
604. 07 VIOLATION OF PROVISION - Eliminate this item - it is
included in 605. 00.
604. 08 - The Planning Commission felt this section should be
included in the "Building" Chapter of the Code.
604. 09 - Eliminate (already in 605. 00) .
605. 00 - Renumber to 604 . 10
605. 00 Subd. 3 - In each place where 'City Clerk' is mentioned,
change to 'Clerk Administrator' . Also, where it states ". . . other
official designated by the Council . . . ", change to "their
designee" .
A copy of the draft Nuisance Ordinance was forwarded to the City
Council in early August so that adequate time for review was
available. Staff will await City Council direction on the
recommendations.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 15.
�f�tiLS
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 94-1294WS
EES°
AGENDA SESSION DATE SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 Report Date: 9-7-94
DISPOSITION
Item Description:
Update of TCCAP Site Redevelopment
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
,SUMMARY;
Last Tuesday, Congressman Vento sponsored an informational meeting on the
disposition of the TCAAP property. Representatives from the Army, MPCA,
PCA, GSA, and the Office of Economic Adjustment were present to outline the
process for surplusing the site.
The result of the meeting was Vento's suggestion that, like other such
sites in the nation, a community "Reutilization Committee" be formed to
conduct a year long planning process to determine the Reutilization Plan
for the site.
The proposed committee would be composed of local citizens of the four
communities, representatives from the business community, Economic Re-
Adjustment, Homeless organizations, labor and environmental groups.
Specifically requested was a representative from the National Guard, State
of Minnesota, Ramsey County and an elected or appointed official from each
of the four communities.
A nomination form was enclosed with the materials provided at the August
30th meeting with the request that the nominations be made by September
13th.
The purpose of the Reutilization Committee will be to work with the
representatives of the federal agencies, State and local authorities to
create a long-range plan for the public and/or private use of the entire
site, recognizing and working with the legal limitations and restrictions
placed on the site and the process by the federal, state and local
government entities.
Samantha Ordu o, City Administrator
RECOMMENDATION:
STAFF REPORT
PAGE TWO
SEPTEMBER 7, 1994
It was clarified at the meeting that properties used for public use
could be obtained at no (or at least very minimal) costs. This is
very similar to the County's "use deeds" that the City has received
for various tax forfeit properties.
A copy of the nomination form is attached. The Council may wish to
discuss the nomination for the representative from the City of
Mounds View at the Work Session and finalize the nomination at the
September 12th meeting.
It is Vento's desire to have the Committee finalized by October 1st
and the first meeting sometime in October.
CONGRESSMAN BRUCE VENTO
FUTURE OF THE TWIN CITIES ARMY AMMUNITION
PLANT (TCAAP)
AGENDA
Tuesday, August 30, 1994
6:30 - 8:30 PM
Main Floor Conference Room
Building 105, TCAAP
6:35 -6:45 Welcome - Congressman Bruce Vento
6:45 - 6:55 Perry Reynolds, AMCCOM
Overview of the Army's intentions and procedures regarding the release of
the land
6:55 - 7:05 Dagmar Romano (MPCA) and Thomas Barounas (EPA)
General overview of the clean-up process and needs of TCAAP, and
overview of the certifications process for uncontaminated land.
7:05 - 7:15 Dennis Spearman, Government Services Administration
Overview of the federal land disposal procedure
7:15 - 7:25 Patrick O'Brien, Office of Economic Adjustment- Dept. of Defense
Overview of DoD's support role available to a reutilization committee.
7:25 - 7:35 Congressman Vento explains proposed formation ofthe re-utilization
committee
7:40 Open floor for questions
8:30 End of Meeting
•
•
TWIN CITIES ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT
AREAS OF CONCERN
(CURRENT FOCUS)
ri CO. RD. I
I -...
1.. -
3°8 MEM&
-----.-.--777..
- j \
•\
ii
ft SITEA t .
_
••"••• .,/ /..... i l' MARSDEN
i
.1! .,...._- ..... ., --i .4 \ ii2
./ . i 1 .% 0 LAKE ...._...i
....-•
. , . . ._....._... .................• i % .1 Z ...•
..,.. ....
i ••••
\ .....*•'.
• ...,,. ii
i i
• I i
.• ." ——
(_.\....../._._._._.,
".: a
A
• 1
e Iv
i.1 • ••••7•••• . .‘ •--...•i
&./. .
xsTE a1/4.,. /
8/ 1 •• I
. SITE 129-5 i
j i \•.1
'I el* • ............. . .
............. i / ............
...... /. \
•• .::7.7.7... ::::::::::::. i .%
/ ... ... ....
.......,. ...........: i 1 */* ...••.•.•.•.
.1
4..„;,,,..-..:. • ............. .
r1907 /
.
•
..'• ' .. ... ..
-• 103 •
Li i .
,....... . ••••• i .
• • • ••
MARSDEN .\
129-15
o i LAKE 1.\ z
.....
•"•••-• a
p 1
<
CI ..............
—"•—••••-•
.\ Z
\ 0
0 9,gi,t
CC ..............,
e z
•. i z
.......... • R
.
• • _ < I
• -.• :
lal i •
BUILDING 105 ca
IX 1
m
< \ .
\
1 •1
j
9 . o •:.........•.•.•:: x
. z .. ...
Silt ..1 M .............. 1 i
503 •-,
lliki, SITE G .
\
i %q11•011?
4 .
;..
.,s, ....
.
0 4
.4\..,
501 i
--_-
• :-:------------
. .*f. ..
.SITE I*:--_-_- /. •
SITE ••• i
J 6
. y . 57eiti..•
i
..-
HWY 96
History of Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP)
The Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) is a government-owned,
contractor-operated military Installation under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Armament
Munitions and Chemical Command (AMCCOM). It comprises approximately 2400 acres.
The Installation was established in 1942 as part of the World War II build-up. It supported
the U.S. Army needs for World War II, the Korean Conflict, and the Viet Nam Conflict.
Since 1976 it has been on standby status.
In 1991, the Installation mission was declared in excess of Army needs. The
Installation is now under a Modified Caretaker Status and has no mobilization mission. The
property is used for storage, training, and office space. Also, the railroad spur is utilized.
Federal Cartridge Company manages the Installation under an agreement with the Army.
Alliant Techsystems Inc., a manufacturer of fuzes, mines, and electronic components
for artillery and torpedoes, operates on the property under a facility use contract. Alliant
occupies four (4) primary buildings on the site.
There are also 14 family housing units on the Installation.
The facility was contaminated over the years and is now a Superfund site through the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
Under this designation, the property must be certified as clean before it can be excessed and
made available for other uses. Examples of contaminants include solid wastes,.PCBs,
hazardous wastes, volatiles organic compounds, heavy metals, and problems related to tenant
activities. As such, the federal government retains responsibility for the clean up of pollution
before sites can be released for reuse. At this time, approximately five (5) clean up projects
are underway.
TCAAP also has groundwater contamination. A Groundwater Remedial Program has
been implemented,•and is expected to continue 20-30 years. Groundwater monitoring will •
continue indefinitely. • -
•
Small parcels of the land have been acquired by public agencies for various public
uses. A twenty-six acre parcel in the southeast corner has been transferred to the Army for
use as an Army Reserve Training Center. An eight acre parcel was deeded to Ramsey
County on the eastern border of the property for recreational use.
The west portion of the Installation, about half of the total, is largely developed with
buildings, warehouses, bunkers, road, railroad tracks and parking lots. The eastern half has
' been at least partially disturbed by test firing of munitions, military training, and other
activities. Some areas of the property are in a more natural state, and may not have experi-
enced contamination.
- Ni101 La 111L..1 1IV I 1 LimAin,La V F1A./ f— Lou ill I I
, DISPOSAL PROCESS
Screened for Other
Defense Needs
I
Remaining Property Declared
Excess to Defense
Screened for other Screened for 1
Federal Agencies McKinney Act 1
L . Remaining Property Declared •
Surplus to Federal Government •
Offered to State
and Local Governments
(public benefit conveyances
and negotiated sales)
1
Community & State
Identify Desired Properties .
(consistent with reuse plan)
- 1 .
Remaining Property Offered
to General Public
(public bid sales)
4
CONGRESSMAN BRUCE VENTO
Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant Reutilization Committee
Nomination Form
Name
Address
Home Phone Work Phone FAX
QUALIFICATIONS FOR POSITION:
Nomination to represent:
Local Neighborhood/Citizens (For each community. Please circle one: Arden
Hills, Moundsview, Shoreview,New Brighton)
Business Community
Economic Re-Adjustment
Homeless
Labor
Environment
Are you associated with any of these groups? If so,how?
Nominated by:
The following will also be represented on the committee, and will nominate their own
representative:
Minnesota National Guard
State of Minnesota
Ramsey County
Cities of Arden Hills, Mounds View, Shoreview and New Brighton
Federal Representatives
Only one application per person per seat. Nominations must be received by Sept. 13 at 5
PM. Forms may be sent to: 175 E. 5th Street, Room 727, Box 100, St. Paul, MN 55101, or
faxed to: 224-0575. For more information, contact Molly Grove in Congressman Vento's office
at 224-4503.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 1. (EDC)
!VSSTAFF REPORT Report Number: 94-1295WS
°
AGENDA SESSION DATE SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 Report Date: 9-7-94
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Consideration of Marketing Task Force Resolution and Objectives
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement thisuppleme -411
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
To follow the goals and action steps of both the Focus 2000 Implementation Plan and the 1994
Economic Development Work Plan, a marketing task force needs to be established to enhance the
image of the City of Mound View. It is envisioned that the marketing task force will meet
throughout the rest of 1994 to develop a comprehensive marketing plan for the City. The proposed
plan will then be presented to the EDA in the first quarter of 1995 for implementation throughout
1999 as stated in the 5-year Goal Plan.
It is proposed to have the attached resolution be approved by the EDA at the September 12th
meeting. I have attached the goal and action steps for the task force for your review. In addition,
I have developed a list of potential candidates to serve on the task force. The establishment of the
marketing task force was included in the last newsletter encouraging resident participation. So far,
no calls have been received expressing an interest in participation.
Cathy Be , Economic Development Coordinator
RECOMMENDATIONz
RESOLUTION NO. 94-EDA14
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A MARKETING TASK FORCE
WHEREAS, consistent feedback that was received from the Focus 2000 Project was the
urgency to enhance the City of Mounds View's image; and
WHEREAS, the Focus 2000 Implementation Plan included the creation of a Marketing Task
Force as Goal #2 in 1994; and
WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority believes public participation is essential to
market a positive image for the City; and
WHEREAS, the creation of a Marketing Task Force has been determined by the Economic
Development Authority to be the best avenue by which to generate ideas to enhance the image of
the City of Mounds View.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Economic Development Authority, in and for
the City of Mounds View, does hereby establish a Marketing Task Force to be composed of
residents and business representatives with marketing experience; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the task force will be responsible for preparing a
comprehensive marketing program for the City of Mounds View; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Marketing Task Force will meet through 1994 and present
a draft plan to the Economic Development Authority in the first quarter of 1995; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Marketing Task Force is to be that of an advisory group to
and directed by the Economic Development Authority to explore and report recommendations to
the Economic Development Authority for the implementation of a comprehensive marketing plan;
and
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Marketing Task Force shall be directed to select from
amongst themselves a Chairperson, Vice Chairperson and Secretary, establish a meeting schedule,
and develop a mission statement.
Adopted this 12 day of September, 1994.
ATTEST:
President
(SEAL)
Executive Director
Marketing Task Force
Goal:
oo Prepare a comprehensive marketing plan for the City of Mounds.View which will outline
oo
procedure for marketing the benefits of the City to businesses and generate image
enhancement for the general public. This marketing plan will be presented to the
Economic Development Authority for review in the first quarter of 1995 with
implementation to begin in 1995.
Duration of Task Force:
oo Three to four month process to include at least one meeting per month with additional
oo
meetings arranged at the discretion of the task force members.
Elements to Consider for inclusion in Marketing Plan:
x Evaluate the feasibility of entrance and exit signs designating Mounds View's boundaries.
This pertains especially along highway 10 corridor.
x Develop communication strategies for the City of Mounds View. These strategies should
focus on improving the dissemination of information on activities at City Hall, good news
throughout the City and announcements pertaining to City events, public meetings,
changes in meetings, etc.
oo Develop a new identity for Mounds View to include logo enhancement, catchy tagline,
oo
and city events which will set Mounds View apart from other Cities of similar size.
Example: Marketfest has put White Bear Lake on the map throughout the entire state.
�X
Review Mounds View's current publications and recommend new publications using same
motif developed for Mounds View's new image.
oo Review the development of a Mounds View Business Newsletter. Include ideas for
oo
format, potential contents, frequency of publication and business ownership.
X Review the development of specific marketing campaigns.
00 "Buy Mounds View First" Campaign - to encourage residents and businesses to buy
within the community
og "Spread the Good News" Campaign - to encourage residents and businesses to
spread good news regarding special activities throughout Mounds View such as
outstanding students, awards, innovative business products, etc.
;g "Mounds View Two-Words" Campaign - to educate residents, businesses and the
entire metro area regarding the correct spelling of Mounds View.
Potential Candidates:
X Sheri Timmons, Marketing Director, Paster Enterprises
X Barb Haake - Cable T.V.
x Charlynn Robertson - Resident
X Debbie Hamernick, SYSCO MINNESOTA -
X George Winnecki - Owner of Win Insurance
• Liberty Check representative per Diane Wouri
.%
• Roy Olenkamp, resident, Wolf & Assoc.
• Chuck Miller - resident and small business owner
%4 Mel Brandel - resident, Printmaster
X Charlie Hall - Mermaid Supper Club
lir
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: q
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 94-1288WS
C ,§ AGENDA SESSION DATE SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 Report Date: 9-7-94
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Discussion Regarding NSP Audit
Administrator's Review/Recommendation: -
/, -
- No comments to supplement this reports
- Comments attached. \,
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
tIJMMARY;
Approximately two weeks ago staff met with representatives from NSP, SEH,
Keating and Assoc. to discuss the proposed City facilities energy audit.
Areas included in the audit were all park facilities, water treatment
plants and well pump motors, public works facility, and the city hall and
police dept. Mechanical inspections would include inspection of all HVAC
systems, lighting, NSP gas and electric rate options, and water production
alternatives.
Staff received a draft proposal from SEH that included all of these areas
for a estimated cost of $35,000. 00. This is a starting point for a total
audit. It is possible that some lower figure may be attainable by
eliminating facilities such as park shelters, that use- relatively little
energy compared to the treatment plants, public works facility and city
hall. Even though NSP will reimburse the City for 15% of the engineering
expense based on energy reductions (approximately $5250) , this is not
guaranteed. Funding for this audit can be from multiple sources, since
audits will include areas in water and sewer.
Staff seeks council discussion and direction in this matter.
# /-/714-4 - --
Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
RECOMMENDATION;
-50 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE,200 SEH CENTER,ST.PAUL,MN 55110 612 490-2000 800 325-2055
ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION
Supplemental Letter Agreement
•
p s
August 18, 1994CD) RE: Mounds View, Minnesota
Energy Study
SEH No. A-MOUND9502.00
Mr. Mike Ulrich, Director of Public Works
City of Mounds View
2466 Bronson Drive
Mounds View, MN 55112
Dear Mike:
We are pleased to submit this proposal for Professional Engineering Services in conjunction with
the preparation of an energy study of City owned facilities. Our services will be provided in
accordance with our Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated November 17, 1993,
hereinafter called the Agreement.
The intent of the study is to identify potential cost savings by reducing the consumption of
electricity and natural gas. This study is prompted by the NSP "Local Government Energy
Conservation Program," as well as other NSP rebate programs. This study will not, however, be
limited to only the items which qualify for the NSP programs. Other measures will be presented
if found to be cost effective.
Work to be included in the study is described as follows:
1. Analysis of the water system to determine the most energy efficient mode of operation,
potential equipment revisions and the best utilization of energy rate structures.
2. Assessment of the mechanical and electrical systems of City owned buildings and
facilities. The assessment will include a tabulation of existing energy use and cost at each
site and tabulation of existing equipment sizes,locations,age and model number for each
site. Sites to be assessed are as follows:
a. City Hall
b. Public Works Garage
c. Water Treatment Plants (3)
d. Pump Houses (3)
e. Water Booster Station
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC. MINNEAPOLIS,MN ST CLOUD,MN CHIPPEWA FALLS,WI MADISON, WI
Mr. Mike Ulrich 'f[ 6
August 18, 1994 o
Page 2
f. Park Buildings (5)
g. Sewage Lift Stations (2)
3. Preparation of a series of cost saving scenarios. Each scenario will describe the proposed
work and will include an Estimate of Cost, predicted energy savings, projected payback
period and applicable NSP program.
4. Preparation of recommendations for energy saving operation and maintenance
procedures for various equipment.
5. Assembly of the information, analysis and recommendations into a bound report for
presentation to the City.
Major work tasks to be performed for the completion of the above work include:
• Review of NSP program documentation
• Field inspection of each site
• Heating plant efficiency testing
• Site meetings with City staff
• Report preparation
• City review and final presentation
Completion of this study will involve extensive work by our subconsultants. Kaeding and
Associates will provide electrical engineering services and Wentz Associates will provide
mechanical engineering services. The performance of some work tasks will require access to City
facilities and may involve minor assistance for City personnel.
Compensation for our services will be a fee based on our payroll cost times a factor of 2.24 for
services rendered by our personnel engaged directly on the project plus reimbursable expenses
including subconsultant's, mileage and equipment rental. We estimate this fee to be $
We will bill you monthly for services and reimbursable expenses. The above financial
arrangements are based on the basis of prompt payment of our bills and the orderly and
continuous progress of the project.
We would expect to start our services promptly after receipt of your acceptance of this proposal
and submit preliminary documents for review within 120 days. As previously discussed, the
measurement of heating plant efficiency will be delayed until the heating season to achieve the
most accurate results. Services are to be rendered in the customary phase which, together with
the general understandings applicable to our relationship with you, are set forth in the
Agreement. Your particular responsibilities are also set forth in the Agreement.
Mr. Mike Ulrich
August 18, 1994
Page 3
This Supplemental Letter Agreement and the Agreement represents the entire understanding
between you and us in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if signed by
both of us. If it satisfactorily sets forth your understanding of our Agreement, we would
appreciate you signing the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided below and returning
it to us.
Sincerely,
Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
Steve Campbell, P.E.
kam
Attachment
Accepted this day of , 1994
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
By:
Title:
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: SAMANTHA ORDUNO, CITY ADMINISTRiNtOR
DATE: AUGUST 31 , 1994
RE: INDEX FOR WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 5, 1994
MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 5, 1994
. Council Meeting, Wednesday, September 7, 1994, 7:00 p.m.
ITEMS PROVIDED IN THIS WEEK'S COUNCIL PACKET
. This Is It!
. Agenda
******************
ADMINISTRATOR'S SCHEDULE
(Please note that this schedule is subject to change
as meetings are scheduled, rescheduled or canceled.
At any time Audrey, Michele, or Tim C. will have my
most current schedule and a number where I can be
reached at all times. )
Monday, September 5, 1994
Labor Day Holiday
Tuesday, September 6, 1994
Out of Office - Happy New Year!
Wednesday, September 7, 1994
7:00 p.m. Council Work Session
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PAGE TWO
SEPTEMBER 7, 1994
Thursday, September 8, 1994
5:00 p.m. Meeting with Woodlawn Terrace Tenants, Management and
Owners
Friday, September 9, 1994
y.Illor
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 8'
OwuS Report Number: 94-1287WS
EN
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA SESSION DATE September 7, 1994 Report Date: 8-31-94
DISPOSITION
Item Description:
Discussion Regarding the Pavement Management Program
Administrator's Review/Recommendation: �--"----N
_nn�,�J
- No comments to supplement this report �l
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
FIJMMARY;
Barry Peters of SEH has, been programming and inputting data to compile the
City's Pavement Management Program. Most recent information includes the
1994 projects of cracksealing, slurry sealing, and some of the patching
contract. He will have a 5 year Capital Improvement Plan developed, with
projections of expenses which will include regularly scheduled preventative
maintenance procedures, and a reconstruction schedule. Most roads will be
reconstructed to a 32 foot width, all with curb and gutter and storm sewer.
The fund utilized for the past years maintenance programs has been the
Silver Lake Woods Fund, which is decreasing rapidly. An assessment policy
is being worked on to provide an alternative funding source for future
maintenance projects.
The Pavement Management Program will be presented at the work session on
Wednesday, or hand delivered as soon as it becomes available.
7
'Ad
ic .ael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
RECOMMENDATION;
_raif
_:... REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Sec-mon: 12.
S'I'_ F+ REPORT
.,-.
Report Number: 94-1291WS
AGENDA SESSION DATE September 7, 1994 Report Date: -11-q4
DLSPOSITION
i:err. Description:
Update oil, Proposed 1995 General Fund and Enterprise Fund Budgets
—
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report L
- Cor" erts attached.
:.:ip ianatron Summar^.' attach supplement sheeti-as-tStrCe33ary.)
cT'tirvMAR
State law provides that no later than-September 15, 1994 the City must certify to the county auditor:
• The dates it has selected for its public hearing and for the continuation of its hearing, if
necessary. The date for the hearing or the continuation hearing must be between
November 29 and December 20, 1994, and must not conflict with the hearing dates of the
County, School District, and Metropolitan Special Taxing Districts.
• A proposed budget and proposed property tax levy for 1995.
•The attached calendar lists the dates selected by the County, School District, and Metropolitan Special
Taxing Districts. In selecting a hearing date and a continuation date, if needed, two other requirements
should be kept in mind:
• The continuation hearing date selected must be at least five business days after the initial
hearing date but no more than fourteen days after the initial hearing.
• The budget and property tax levy must be adopted at a public hearing subsequent to the
initial budget hearing, or subsequent to the date of the continuation hearing, if one is held.
The subsequent hearing must be held at least one business day after the initial hearing,
or the continuation hearing, if one is held, but no later than December 28, 1994.
The following dates are proposed for the budget hearing, continuation hearing, if needed, and the
subsequent hearing to adopt the 1995 Budget and Property Tax Levy:
• • Initial budget hearing, Wednesday November 30, 1994. Continuation hearing, if needed,
• Wednesday December 7, 1994.
• Hearing to adopt budget and property tax levy, Wednesday December 7, 1994, if
continuation of budget hearing not needed; Wednesday December 14, 1994, if
continuation of November 30, 1994 budget hearing is held on December 7, 1994.
The second decision to be made is to certify a proposed 1995 Budget and 1995 Property Tax Levy to
the County Auditor. After the July 18, 1994 Budget Work Session a balanced budget was agreed upon.
This was achieved by the following actions:
Revenues - 7/14/94 $3,487,054
franchise fees 100,000
transfer, vehicle & equipment fund 67,753
transfer, tax increments 3,521
property tax increase 26,352
Revenues - 7/18/94 $3,439,227
Expenditures - 7/14/94 $3,487,054
seasonal worker, streets (4,575)
maintenance worker, parks (36,752)
N.W. Youth Services 1,000
North Metro Mayors Assn (7,500)
Expenditures - 7/18/94 $3,439,227
That General Fund property tax levy increase is 6.8% more than the 1994 General Fund levy. I received
notice from the City of Blaine that we may reduce the scheduled property tax levy for repayment of the
fire bonds from $100,417 to $94,596 for 1995. This reduction of$5,821 is attributable to a change in
the cost allocation formula of the participating cities. Overall the proposed property tax levy for 1995
would increase by 5.9%. Owners of single family residential property would see increases in their tax
bills of between 6.86% and 8.99%, depending upon the market value of their property.
Subsequent to the July 18, 1994 Budget Work Session several items have modified the 1994 General
Fund Budget:
• The City has received notification from the Mn Dep't. of Revenue that the City's 1995
Homestead Credit will increase by $8,724 in 1995. Since the previous revenue estimate
had shown a decrease in 1995 Homestead Credit of$18,337, this represents an increase
in estimated revenues of$27,061 over the previous estimate.
• The City has received notification from the Mn Dep't. of Revenue that Local Government
Aid(LGA) will increase by $17,363 in 1995. Since the previous revenue estimate has
shown a decrease in 1995 LGA of $17,000, this represents an increase in estimated
revenues of$34,673 over the previous estimate.
• Chief Ramacher received an estimate of 1995 police dispatching costs that is$3,978 lower
than the previous estimate he had.
These changes could allow the City to stay within its earlier goal of a 5% property tax levy increase for
1995. If the City had a 5% property tax levy increase for 1995, expenditures could be increased by
$39,360. These changes are listed below.
Option No. 1 - Increase Expenditures. 5% Property Tax Levy Increase
Revenues - 7/18/94 $3,439,227
homestead credit change 27,061
LGA change 34,673
maintain 5% property tax (26,352)
levy
Revenues - 8/25/94 $3,474,609
Expenditures 7/18/94 $3,439,227
police dispatch contract (3,978)
expenditure increase ? ? ? 39,360
Expenditures - 8/25/94 $3,474,609
Due to a decrease in the 1995 levy for the fire bonds, a 5% increase in the General Fund property tax
levy results in an overall increase in the 1995 property tax levy of 4.3%. Owners of single family
residential property would see their tax bills increase between 4.55% and 6.79%, depending upon the
market value of their property.
Another option would be reducing the property tax levy by $39,360. This option is listed below.
Option No. 2 - Decrease Property Taxes
Revenues - 7/18/94 $3,439,227
homestead credit change 27,061
LGA change 34,673
maintain 5% property tax levy (26,352)
reduce property tax levy further (39,360)
Revenues - 8/25/94 $3,435,249
Expenditures - 7/18/94 $3,439,227
police dispatch contract (3,978)
Expenditures - 8/25/94 $3,435,249
Due to a decrease in the levy for fire bonds, the overall property tax levy would increase by 1.8%.
Owners of single family residential property would see increases in their tax bills of between 1.09% and
3.26%, depending upon the market value of their property.
Staff awaits Council direction on these matters. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Donald Brager, Finance irector
NOVEMBER
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
29 30
School Hearing City Hearing
DECEMBER
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
1 2 3
4 5 I 6 7 8 9 10
Agenda Mtg City Cont'd or
Metro Hearing School Cont'd City Adopt Hearirg
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Council Mtg City Adopt Heari g
Metro Cont'd County Hearing (if Cont'd Hearin)
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
County Cont'd
25 26 27 28
Council Mtg
1 1
7/18/94 DRAFT
GENERAL FUND TAX LEVY INCREASE 6.8%
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 1995 BUDGETED REVENUES 08/24/94
100 GENERAL FUND
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 %'95 Budget
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROPOSED To'94 Budget
GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES
3010 CURRENT AD VALOREM $964,786 $1,087,709 $1,214,706 $1,451,421 $1,550,344 6.82%
3015 DELINQUENT AD VALOREM $4,733 $3,641 ($16,067) $3,639 $3,597 -1.15%
3025 MOBILE HOME TAX $6,472 $11,275 $8,553 $0 $0 0.00%
3028 MOBILE HOME TAX - DEL. $1,445 $2,304 $1,002 $0 $0 0.00%
3030 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $0 $1,212 $1,607 $0 $0 0.00%
3070 PENALTIES &INTEREST $0 $0 $0 $1,739 $0 -100.00%
3072 MOBILE HOME PEN &INT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3080 FORFEITED TAX SALES $3,732 $425 $49 $2,702 $435 -83.90%
TOTAL GEN PROPERTY TAXES $981,168 $1,106,566 $1,209,850 $1,459,501 $1,554,376 6.50%
LICENSES & PERMITS
3300 LICENSES $52,834 $59,778 $55,963 $57,251 $45,613 -20.33%
3200 PERMITS $45,884 $51,915 $33,442 $48,073 $42,332 -11.94%
TOTAL LICENSES& PERMITS $98,718 $111,693 $89,405 $105,324 $87,945 -16.50%
FINES & FORFEITS
3710 RAMSEY CTY. MUN. CT. $27,829 $28,897 $30,068 $28,363 $29,031 2.36%
3720 MINN HIGHWAY PATROL $994 $592 $350 $858 $645 -24.83%
3730 ADMIN. OFFENSES $12,011 $16,352 $16,784 $11,928 $15,050 26.17%
TOTAL FINES &FORFEITS $40,834 $45,841 $47,202 $41,149 $44,726 8.69%
INTERGOV'TL REVENUE
3615 HOMESTEAD CREDIT $310,432 $318,183 $344,674 $366,747 $348,410 -5.00%
3616 MOBILE HOME HOMESTD. $8,672 $9,801 $8,757 $0 $0 0.00%
3621 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID $539,924 $576,455 $547,183 $596,874 $579,874 -2.85%
3622 POLICE AID $66,957 $69,521 $73,504 $42,952 $73,504 71.13%
3623 CIVIL DEFENSE $4,604 $7,196 $6,500 $7,196 $6,100 -15.23%
3671 STREET AID $61,790 $55,774 $61,303 $60,841 $61,528 1.13%
3690 OTHER GRANTS IN AID $7,326 $15,659 $30,179 $7,735 $6,415 -17.07%
TOTAL INTERGOV'TL REVENUE $999,705 $1,052,589 $1,072,100 $1,082,345 $1,075,831 -0.60%
w
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 1994 BUDGETED REVENUES 08/24/94
100 GENERAL FUND
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 %'95 Budget
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROPOSED To'94 Budget
CURRENT SERVICES
3401 SUBDIVISION $225 $425 $650 $450 $450 0.00%
3402 VARIANCE $225 $875 $0 $375 $300 —20.00%
3403 REZONING $50 $200. $350 $200 $200 0.00%
3410 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3415 ADMIN. CHGE. — NON REFD $540 $270 $510 $300 $300 0.00%
3420 ASSESSMENT SEARCH $610 $1,080 $610 $600 $610 1.67%
3421 POLICE REPORTS $652 $534 $503 $594 $563 —5.22%
3422 DOCUMENTS/COPIES $395 $104 $241 $372 $246 —33.87%
3423 CUSTOMER SERVICE $571 $411 $496 $475 $493 3.79%
3424 DOG IMPOUNDING FEES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3490 TREE REMOVAL $0 $0 $4,261 $14,000 $4,000 —71.43%
3475 METER SALES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
TOTAL CURRENT SERVICES $3,268 $3,899 $7,621 $17,366 $7,162 —58.76%
OTHER REVENUES
3901 INVESTMENT INTEREST $75,167 $42,179 $47,768 $34,498 $37,500 8.70%
3911 SALE OF ASSETS $3,953 $1,700 $4,931 $0 $0 0.00%
3912 RESALE OF MATERIALS $707 $161 $370 $0 $0 0.00%
3921 FESTIVAL COMMISSION $6,755 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3931 DONATIONS $2,100 $4,000 $4,150 $0 $0 0.00%
3951 INSURANCE REIMBS $55,711 $21,413 $65,294 $0 $0 0.00%
3961 TRANSFERS $318,787 $268,429 $442,751 $261,637 $338,624 29.43%
3971 FRANCHISE FEES $0 $0 $0 $125,312 $152,341 21.57%
3972 TRANSFER —TIF $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,790 100.00%
3991 OTHER REVENUE $6,395 $5,151 $14,110 $5,773 $5,599 —3.01%
3992 LOAN PROCEEDS $0 $93,477 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
TOTAL OTHER REVENUES $469,575 $436,510 $579,374 $427,220 $626,854 46.73%
NON — REVENUE
3820 SURCHARGE $0 $81 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3850 APPROP — FUND BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $13,405 $42,333 215.80%
3890 OTHER NON—REVENUE $0 $8,080 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
TOTAL NON — REVENUE $0 $8,161 $0 $13,405 $42,333 215.80%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $2,593,268 $2,765,259 $3,005,552 $3,146,310 $3439,227 9.31%
PROPOSED 1995 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1993 1994 1994 DEPARTMENT TEAM
ACTUAL BUDGETED ESTIMATED REQUESTS REQUESTS DIFFERENCE
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
CITY COUNCIL $44,192 $45,603 • $0 $60,107 $60,107 $0
ADVISORY COMMISSIONS $657 $1,044 $394 $1,603 $1,603 $0
OFFICE OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR $183,153 $213,286 $0 $125,607 $124,097 ($1,510
HUMAN RESOURCES $27,626 $20,805 $0 $29,435 $27,725 ($1,710
PUBLIC INFORMATION $34,164 $37,617 $0 $55,088 $58,838 $3,750
MANAGEMEMT INFO. SYSTEMS $29,170 $29,857 $0 $84,765 $34,765 ($50,000
ELECTIONS $3,858 $10,847 $0 $10,285 $10,285 $0
FINANCIAL RRT. &AUDITING $49,691 $48,389 $48,389 $58,174 $51,383 ($6,791
BUDGETING $39,599 $39,158 $39,158 $44,879 $41,413 ($3,466
ACCTG &PAYROLL SERVICES $31,016 $37,551 $37,551 $44,638 $39,326 ($5,312
FINANCIAL SERVICES $31,003 $32,657 $32,657 $33,485 $26,110 ($7,375
LEGAL $70,294 $70,500 $70,500 $66,500 $66,500 $0
PLANNING $41,740 $45,980 $45,980 $45,909 $45,209 ($700
ENGINNERING SERVICES $8,527 $12,484 $12,484 $12,622 $8,547 ($4,075
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW $34,587 $42,373 $42,373 $45,723 $45,173 ($550
INSPECTIONS $51,221 $53,075 $53,075 $98,449 $98,424 ($25)
CODE ENFORCEMENT $25,688 $27,304 $27,304 $35,502 $35,502 $0
CENTRAL SERVICES $342,197 $339,749 $352,148 $185,676 $166,226 ($19,450
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT $1,048,383 $1,108,279 $762,013 $1,038,447 $941,233 ($97,214
PUBLIC SAFETY
POLICE ADMINISTRATION $973,955 $195,101 $195,101 $209,581 $206,381 ($3,200
CRIME PREVENTION/DARE $17,400 $18,214 $18,214 $38,474 $17,649 ($20,825
POLICE PATROLS $608,831 $655,313 $655,313 $688,934 $684,419 ($4,515
POLICE INVESTIGATIONS $112,396 $120,238 $120,238 $129,440 $129,440 $0
MANAGEMENT INFO.SYSTEMS $51,529 $64,137 $64,137 $67,006 $67,006 $0
FIRE $0 $155,418 $155,418 $155,418 $155,418 $0
EMERGENCY SERVICES $15,840 $18,356 $18,356 $17,317 $17,317 $0
COMMUNITY $14,357 $17,153 $17,153 $18,244 $18,244 $0
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY $1,794,308 $1,243,930 $1,243,930 $1,324,414 $1,295,874 ($28,540
STREETS & HIGHWAY
STREETS - PAVEMTN MGT $108,501 $196,849 $198,156 $227,051 $198,026 ($29,025
SNOW& ICE CONTROL $55,500 $58,050 $60,475 $70,010 $57,955 ($12,055
SIGN MAINTENANCE $28,035 $25,787 $26,057 $27,768 :$27,768 $0
FLEET SERVICES: $0
BLDG&GRNDS MAINTENANCE $32,607 $31,518 $31,592 $71,310 $49,016 ($22,294
SQUAD &STAFF CARS $40,842 $48,592 $52,152 $50,517 $48,117 ($2,400
VEHICLES&EQUIPMENT $17,892 $19,671 $20,343 $20,199 $20,199 $0
TOTAL STREETS &HIGHWAYS $283,377 $380,467 $388,775 $466,855 $401,081 ($65,774
PROPOSED 1995 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1993 1994 1994 DEPARTMENT TEAM
ACTUAL BUDGETED ESTIMATED REQUESTS REQUESTS DIFFERENCE
PARKS & RECREATION
RECREATION ADMINSTRATION $17,878 $18,352 $18,352 $19,691 $19,691 $0
RECREATION PROGRAMMING $49,697 $59,349 $59,349 $72,779 $61,279 ($11,500
RECREATION SALES & MARKETING $27,697 $24,550 $24,550 $30,778 $30,778 $0
PARKS ADMINISTRATION $19,372 $26,554 $26,554 $33,402 $31,402 ($2,000
PARKS IMPROVEMENTS $45,339 $52,768 $52,768 $97,834 $63,434 ($34,400
PARK GEN MAINTENANCE-REPAIR $127,252 $133,671 $133,671 $271,990 $230,482 ($41,508
ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENANCE $8,817 $9,992 $9,992 $10,680 $8,697 ($1,983
TREE DISEASE CONTROL $20,959 $27,299 $27,299 $24,936 $24,936 $0
REFORESTATION-BEAUTIFICATION $12,399 $14,174 $14,174 $15,993 $15,993 $0
GOLF COURSE $0 $25,096 $25,096 $52,341 $52,341 $0
TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION $329,410 $391,805 $391,805 $630,424 $539,033 ($91,391
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
RECRUITMENT&RETENTION $0 $58,547 $0 $78,682 $82,455 $3,773
MARKETING $0 $3,950 $0 $23,423 $20,973 ($2,450
TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $0 $62,497 $0 $102,105 $103,428 $1,323
SOCIAL SERVICES COOODINATION
FAMILY SERVICES $0 $0 $0 $12,500 $13,500 $0
INCREASES (DECREASES),
CONTINGENCY $36,950 $50,000 $0 $75,000 $50,000 ($25,000
SALARY ADJ - COLA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
SALARY ADJ - COMP WORTH $27,000 $0 $0 $35,000 $35,000 $0
TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS $47,177 $17,302 $0 $52,578 $52,578 $0
REPAIRS AND BEI I ERMENTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FITNESS PROGRAM $0 $5,760 $0 $7,500 $7,500 $0
TOTAL INC (DEC) $111,127 $73,062 $0 $170,078 $145,078 ($25,000
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $3,566,605 $3,260,040 $2,786,523 $3,744,823 $3,439,227 ($306,596
City of Mounds View 08/23/94
Estimated Schedule of Taxes Levied — 1995
Proposed 1995 Levy 6.8% General levy
Taxes Equalization HACA Due By Local
Funds Certified Aid Aid Taxpayers Tax Rates
General $1,550,344.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,550,344.00 25.428%
Capital notes $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.000%
Fire bonds $94,596.00 $0.00 $0.00 $94,596.00 1.552%
Total $1,644,940.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,644,940.00 26.980%
Tax Capacity Valuations: -- Reconciliation of Tax Levy
Real Estate $5,365,455
Personal Property $182,990
Tax Local Amount
Total Tax Capacity $5,548,445 Capacity Tax Rate Levied
Contribution Values (—) ($1,037,754)
Initial FD Dist $1,657,017.00 25.828% $427,974.35
Distribution Values (+) $1,657,017 Local Levy $4,510,691.00 26.980% $1,216,965.65
Adjusted Total Tax Capacity $6,167,708 Total $1,644,940.00
Due By Due from Due by local
Funds Taxpayers Fiscal Dispar. Taxpayers
General $1,550,344.00 $403,362.72 $1,146,981.28
Capital notes $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Fire bonds $94,596.00 $24,611.63 $69,984.37
Total $1,644,940.00 $427,974.35 $1,216,965.65
Tax comparison on selected residential homestead properties 08/23/94
located within the City of Mounds View.
Proposed 1995 Levy 6.8% General levy
1995 Average increase
1994 Tax Capacity Change in in Estimated
Tax Capacity Rate Rate Tax Rate Market Values
25.828% 26.980% 1.15% 2.30%
1994 1995
Estimated 1994 1994 Estimated 1995 1995 Percent
Market Tax Net Market Tax Net Increase Increase
Value Capacity Tax Value Capacity Tax (Decrease) (Decrease)
$51,150.00 $511 .50 $132.11 $52,326 $523.26 $141 .17 $9.06 6.86%
$73,656.00 $753.12 $194.52 $75,350 $787.00 $212.33 $17.81 9.16%
$76,725.00 $814.50 $210.37 $78,490 $849.79 $229.27 $18.90 8.99%
$85,932.00 $998.64 $257.93 $87,908 $1,038.17 $280.09 $22.16 8.59%
$97,185.00 $1,223.70 $316.06 $99,420 $1,268.41 $342.21 $26.15 8.27%
$102,300.00 $1,326.00 $342.48 $104,653 $1,373.06 $370.45 $27.97 8.17%
$112,530.00 $1,530.60 $395.32 $115,118 $1,582.36 $426.92 $31.59 7.99%
$127,875.00 $1,837.50 $474.59 $130,816 $1,896.32 $511 .62 $37.03 7.80%
Option No. 1
General Fund Tax Levy Increase 5
Increase Expenditures
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 1995 BUDGETED REVENUES 08/16/94
100 GENERAL FUND
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 %'95 Budget
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROPOSED To '94 Budget
GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES
3010 CURRENT AD VALOREM $964,786 $1,087,709 $1,214,706 $1,451,421 $1,523,992 5.00%
3015 DELINQUENT AD VALOREM $4,733 $3,641 ($16,067) $3,639 $3,597 -1.15%
3025 MOBILE HOME TAX $6,472 $11,275 $8,553 $0 $0 0.00%
3028 MOBILE HOME TAX- DEL. $1,445 $2,304 $1,002 $0 $0 0.00%
3030 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $0 $1,212 $1,607 $0 $0 0.00%
3070 PENALTIES&INTEREST $0 $0 $0 $1,739 $0 -100.00%
3072 MOBILE HOME PEN&INT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3080 FORFEITED TAX SALES $3,732 $425 $49 $2,702 $435 -83.90%
TOTAL GEN PROPERTY TAXES $981,168 $1,106,566 $1,209,850 $1,459,501 $1,528,024 4.69%
LICENSES & PERMITS
3300 LICENSES $52,834 $59,778 $55,963 $57,251 $45,613 -20.33%
3200 PERMITS $45,884 $51,915 $33,442 $48,073 $42,332 -11.94%
TOTAL LICENSES& PERMITS $98,718 $111,693 $89,405 $105,324 $87,945 -16.50%
FINES & FORFEITS
3710 RAMSEY CTY. MUN. CT. $27,829 $28,897 $30,068 $28,363. $29,031. 2.36%
3720 MINN HIGHWAY PATROL $994 $592 $350 $858 $645 -24.83%
3730 ADMIN.OFFENSES $12,011 $16,352 $16,784 $11,928 $15,050 26.17%
TOTAL FINES&FORFEITS $40,834 $45,841 $47,202 $41,149 $44,726 8.69%
INTERGOV'TL REVENUE
3615 HOMESTEAD CREDIT $310,432 $318,183 $344,674 $366,747 $375,471 2.38%
3616 MOBILE HOME HOMESTD. $8,672 $9,801 $8,757 $0 $0 0.00%
3621 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID $539,924 $576,455 $547,183 $596,874 $614,547 2.96%
3622 POLICE AID $66,957 $69,521 $73,504 $42,952 $73,504 71.13%
3623 CIVIL DEFENSE $4,604 $7,196 $6,500 $7,196 $6,100 -15.23%
3671 STREET AID $61,790 $55,774 $61,303 $60,841 $61,528 1.13%
3690 OTHER GRANTS IN AID $7,326 $15,659 $30,179 $7,735 $6,415 -17.07%
TOTAL INTERGOV'TL REVENUE $999,705 $1,052,589 $1,072,100 $1,082,345 $1,137,565 5.10%
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 1994 BUDGETED REVENUES 08/16/94
100 GENERAL FUND
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 % '95 Budget
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROPOSED To'94 Budget
CURRENT SERVICES
3401 SUBDIVISION $225 $425 $650 $450 $450 0.00%
3402 VARIANCE $225 $875 $0 $375 $300 —20.00%
3403 REZONING $50 $200 $350 $200 $200 0.00%
3410 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3415 ADMIN. CHGE. — NON REFD $540 $270 $510 $300 $300 0.00%
3420 ASSESSMENT SEARCH $610 $1,080 $610 $600 $610 1.67%
3421 POLICE REPORTS $652 $534 $503 $594 $563 —5.22%
3422 DOCUMENTS/COPIES $395 $104 $241 $372 $246 —33.87%
3423 CUSTOMER SERVICE $571 $411 $496 $475 $493 3.79%
3424 DOG IMPOUNDING FEES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3490 TREE REMOVAL $0 $0 $4,261 $14,000 $4,000 —71.43%
3475 METER SALES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
TOTAL CURRENT SERVICES $3,268 $3,899 $7,621 $17,366 $7,162 —58.76%
OTHER REVENUES
3901 INVESTMENT INTEREST $75,167 $42,179 $47,768 $34,498 $37,500 8.70%
3911 SALE OF ASSETS $3,953 $1,700 $4,931 $0 $0 0.00%
3912 RESALE OF MATERIALS $707 $161 $370 $0 $0 0.00%
3921 FESTIVAL COMMISSION $6,755 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3931 DONATIONS $2,100 $4,000 $4,150 $0 $0 0.00%
3951 INSURANCE REIMBS $55,711 $21,413 $65,294 $0 $0 0.00%
3961 TRANSFERS $318,787 $268,429 $442,751 $261,637 $338,624 29.43%
3971 FRANCHISE FEES $0 $0 $0 $125,312 $152,341 21.57%
3972 TRANSFER —TIF $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,790 100.00%
3991 OTHER REVENUE $6,395 $5,151 $14,110 $5,773 $5,599 " —3.01%
3992 LOAN PROCEEDS $0 $93,477 $0 $0 $( 0.00%
TOTAL OTHER REVENUES $469,575 $436,510 $579,374 $427,220 $626,854 46.73%
NON — REVENUE
3820 SURCHARGE $0 $81 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3850 APPROP — FUND BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $13,405 $42,333 215.80%
3890 OTHER NON—REVENUE $0 $8,080 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
TOTAL NON — REVENUE $0 $8,161 $0 $13,405 $42,333 215.80%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $2,593,268 $2,765,259 $3,005,552 $3,146,310 $3,474,609 10.43%
PROPOSED 1995 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1993 1994 1994 DEPARTMENT TEAM
ACTUAL BUDGETED ESTIMATED REQUESTS REQUESTS DIFFERENCE
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
CITY COUNCIL $44,192 $45,603 $0 $60,107 $60,107 $0
ADVISORY COMMISSIONS $657 $1,044 $394 $1,603 $1,603 $0
OFFICE OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR $183,153 $213,286 $0 $125,607 $124,097 ($1,510
HUMAN RESOURCES $27,626 $20,805 $0 $29,435 $27,725 ($1,710
PUBLIC INFORMATION $34,164 $37,617 $0 $55,088 $58,838 $3,750
MANAGEMEMT INFO. SYSTEMS $29,170 $29,857 $0 $84,765 $34,765 ($50,000
ELECTIONS $3,858 $10,847 $0 $10,285 $10,285 $0
FINANCIAL RRT. &AUDITING $49,691 $48,389 $48,389 $58,174 $51,383 ($6,791
BUDGETING $39,599 $39,158 $39,158 $44,879 $41,413 ($3,466
ACCTG &PAYROLL SERVICES $31,016 $37,551 $37,551 $44,638 $39,326 ($5,312
FINANCIAL SERVICES $31,003 $32,657 $32,657 $33,485 $26,110 ($7,375
LEGAL $70,294 $70,500 $70,500 $66,500 $66,500 $0
PLANNING $41,740 $45,980 $45,980 $45,909 $45,209 ($700
ENGINNERING SERVICES $8,527 $12,484 $12,484 $12,622 $8,547 ($4,075
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW $34,587 $42,373 $42,373 $45,723 $45,173 ($550
INSPECTIONS $51,221 $53,075 $53,075 $98,449 $98,424 ($25)
CODE ENFORCEMENT $25,688 $27,304 $27,304 $35,502 $35,502 $0
CENTRAL SERVICES $342,197 $339,749 $352,148 $185,676 $166,226 ($19,450
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT $1,048,383 $1,108,279 $762,013 $1,038,447 $941,233 ($97,214
PUBLIC SAFETY
POLICE ADMINISTRATION $973,955 $195,101 $195,101 $209,581 $206,381 ($3,200
CRIME PREVENTION/DARE $17,400 $18,214 $18,214 $38,474 $17,649 ($20,825
POLICE PATROLS $608,831 $655,313 $655,313 $688,934 $684,419 ($4,515
POLICE INVESTIGATIONS $112,396 $120,238 $120,238 $129,440 $129,440 $0
MANAGEMENT INFO.SYSTEMS $51,529 $64,137 $64,137 $67,006 $63,028 ($3,978
FIRE $0 $155,418 $155,418 $155,418 $155,418 $0
EMERGENCY SERVICES $15,840 $18,356 $18,356 $17,317 $17,317 $0
COMMUNITY $14,357 $17,153 $17,153 $18,244 $18,244 $0
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY $1,794,308 $1,243,930 $1,243,930 $1,324,414 $1,291,896 ($32,518
STREETS & HIGHWAY
STREETS - PAVEMTN MGT $108,501 $196,849 $198,156 $227,051 $198,026 ($29,025
SNOW& ICE CONTROL $55,500 $58,050 $60,475 $70,010 $57,955 ($12,055
SIGN MAINTENANCE $28,035 $25,787 $26,057 $27,768 $27,768 $0
FLEET SERVICES: $0
BLDG&GRNDS MAINTENANCE $32,607 $31,518 $31,592 $71,310 $49,016 ($22,294
SQUAD& STAFF CARS $40,842 $48,592 $52,152 $50,517 $48,117 ($2,400
VEHICLES &EQUIPMENT $17,892 $19,671 $20,343 $20,199 $20,199 $0
TOTAL STREETS & HIGHWAYS $283,377 $380,467 $388,775 $466,855 $401,081 ($65,774
PROPOSED 1995 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1993 1994 1994 DEPARTMENT TEAM
ACTUAL BUDGETED ESTIMATED REQUESTS REQUESTS DIFFERENCE
PARKS & RECREATION
RECREATION ADMINSTRATION $17,878 $18,352 $18,352 $19,691 $19,691 $0
RECREATION PROGRAMMING $49,697 $59,349 $59,349 $72,779 $61,279 ($11,500
RECREATION SALES & MARKETING $27,697 $24,550 $24,550 $30,778 $30,778 $0
PARKS ADMINISTRATION $19,372 $26,554 $26,554 $33,402 $31,402 ($2,000
PARKS IMPROVEMENTS $45,339 $52,768 $52,768 $97,834 $63,434 ($34,400
PARK GEN MAINTENANCE-REPAIR $127,252 $133,671 $133,671 $271,990 $230,482 ($41,508
ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENANCE $8,817 $9,992 $9,992 $10,680 $8,697 ($1,983
TREE DISEASE CONTROL $20,959 $27,299 $27,299 $24,936 $24,936 $0
REFORESTATION-BEAUTIFICATION $12,399 $14,174 $14,174 $15,993 $15,993 $0
GOLF COURSE $0 $25,096 $25,096 $52,341 $52,341 $0
TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION $329,410 $391,805 $391,805 $630,424 $539,033 ($91,391
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
RECRUITMENT& RETENTION $0 $58,547 $0 $78,682 $82,455 $3,773
MARKETING $0 $3,950 $0 $23,423 $20,973 ($2,450
TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $0 $62,497 $0 $102,105 $103,428 $1,323
SOCIAL SERVICES COOODINATION
FAMILY SERVICES $0 $0 $0 $12,500 $13,500 $0.
INCREASES (DECREASES)
CONTINGENCY $36,950 $50,000 $0 $75,000 $89,360 $14,360
SALARY ADJ - COLA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
SALARY ADJ - COMP WORTH $27,000 $0 $0 $35,000 $35,000 $0
TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS $47,177 $17,302 $0 $52,578 $52,578 $0
REPAIRS AND BE 1 I I_RMENTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FITNESS PROGRAM $0 $5,760 $0 $7,500 $7,500 $0
TOTAL INC (DEC) $111,127 $73,062 $0 $170,078 $184,438 $14,360
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $3,566,605 $3,260,040 $2,786,523 $3,744,823 $3,474,609 ($271,214
City of Mounds View 08/16/94
Estimated Schedule of Taxes Levied — 1995
Proposed 1995 Levy 5% General levy
Taxes Equalization HACA Due By Local
Funds Certified Aid Aid Taxpayers Tax Rates
General $1,523,992.05 $0.00 $0.00 $1,523,992.05 24.853%
Capital notes $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.000%
Fire bonds $94,596.00 $0.00 $0.00 $94,596.00 1.543%
Total $1,618,588.05 _a_00 $Q.A1 $1,618,588.05 26.395%
Tax Capacity Valuations: Reconciliation of Tax Levy
Real Estate $5,365,455
Personal Property $182,990
Tax Local Amount
Total Tax Capacity $5,548,445 Capacity Tax Rate Levied
Contribution Values (—) ($1,037,754)
Initial FD Dist $1,657,017.00 25.828% $427,974.35
Distribution Values (+) $1,657,017 Local Levy $4,510,691.00 26.395% $1,190,613.70
Adjusted Total Tax Capacity $6,167,708 .Total $1,618,588.05
Due By Due from Due by local
Funds Taxpayers Fiscal Dispar. Taxpayers
General $1,523,992.05 $402,962.02 $1,121,030.03
Capital notes $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4-
Fire bonds $94,596.00 $25,012.33 $69,583.67
Total $1,618,588.05 $427,974.35 $1,190,613.70
Tax comparison on selected residential homestead properties 08/16/94
located within the City of Mounds View.
- Proposed 1995 Levy 5% General levy
1995 Average increase
1994 Tax Capacity Change in in Estimated
Tax Capacity Rate Rate Tax Rate Market Values
25.828% 26.395% 0.57% 2.30%
1994 1995
Estimated 1994 1994 Estimated 1995 1995 Percent
Market Tax Net Market Tax Net Increase Increase
Value Capacity Tax Value Capacity Tax (Decrease) (Decrease)
$51,150.00 $511 .50 $132.11 $52,326 $523.26 $138.12 $6.01 4.55%
$73,656.00 $753.12 $194.52 $75,350 $787.00 $207.73 .$13.22 6.79%
$76,725.00 $814.50 $210.37 $78,490 $849.79 $224.31 $13.94 6.63%
$85,932.00 $998.64 $257.93 $87,908 $1,038.17 $274.03 $16.10 6.24%
$97,185.00 $1,223.70 $316.06 $99,420 $1,268.41 $334.80 $18.74 5.93%
$102,300.00 $1,326.00 $342.48 $104,653 $1,373.06 $362.42 $19.94 5.82%
$112,530.00 $1,530.60 $395.32 $115,118 $1,582.36 $417.67 $22.35 5.65%
$127,875.00 $1,837.50 $474.59 $130,816 $1,896.32 $500.54 $25.95 5.47%
Option No. 2
General Fund Tax Levy Increase 2.3%
Expenditures per 7/18/94 Draft
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 1995 BUDGETED REVENUES 08/16/94
100 GENERAL FUND
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 %'95 Budget
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROPOSED To'94 Budget
GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES
3010 CURRENT AD VALOREM $964,786 $1,087,709 $1,214,706 $1,451,421 $1,484,632 2.29%
3015 DELINQUENT AD VALOREM $4,733 $3,641 ($16,067) $3,639 $3,597 -1.15%
3025 MOBILE HOME TAX $6,472 $11,275 $8,553 $0 $0 0.00%
3028 MOBILE HOME TAX - DEL. $1,445 $2,304 $1,002 $0 $0 0.00%
3030 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $0 $1,212 $1,607 $0 $0 0.00%
3070 PENALTIES&INTEREST $0 $0 $0 $1,739 $0 -100.00%
3072 MOBILE HOME PEN &INT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3080 FORFEITED TAX SALES $3,732 $425 $49 $2,702 $435 -83.90%
TOTAL GEN PROPERTY TAXES $981,168 $1,106,566 $1,209,850 $1,459,501 $1,488,664 2.00%
LICENSES & PERMITS
3300 LICENSES $52,834 $59,778 $55,963 $57,251 $45,613 -20.33%
3200 PERMITS $45,884 $51,915 $33,442 $48,073 $42,332 -11.94%
TOTAL LICENSES&PERMITS $98,718 $111,693 $89,405 $105,324 $87,945 -16.50%
FINES & FORFEITS
3710 RAMSEY CTY. MUN. CT. $27,829 $28,897 $30,068 $28,363 $29,031 2.36%
3720 MINN HIGHWAY PATROL $994 $592 $350 $858 $645 -24.83%
3730 ADMIN. OFFENSES $12,011 $16,352 $16,784 $11,928 $15,050 26.17%
TOTAL FINES&FORFEITS $40,834 $45,841 $47,202 $41,149 $44,726 8.69%
INTERGOV'TL REVENUE
3615 HOMESTEAD CREDIT $310,432 $318,183 $344,674 $366,747 $375,471 2.38%
3616 MOBILE HOME HOMESTD. $8,672 $9,801 $8,757 $0 $0 0.00%
3621 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID $539,924 $576,455 $547,183 $596,874 $614,547 2.96%
3622 POLICE AID $66,957 $69,521 $73,504 $42,952 $73,504 71.13%
3623 CIVIL DEFENSE $4,604 $7,196 $6,500 $7,196 $6,100 -15.23%
3671 STREET AID $61,790 $55,774 $61,303 $60,841 $61,528 1.13%
3690 OTHER GRANTS IN AID $7,326 $15,659 $30,179 $7,735 $6,415 -17.07%
TOTAL INTERGOV'TL REVENUE $999,705 $1,052,589 $1,072,100 $1,082,345 $1,137,565 5.10%
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 1994 BUDGETED REVENUES 08/16/94
100 GENERAL FUND
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 %'95 Budget
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROPOSED To '94 Budget
CURRENT SERVICES
3401 SUBDIVISION $225 $425 $650 $450 $450 0.00%
3402 VARIANCE $225 $875 $0 $375 $300 —20.00%
3403 REZONING $50 $200 $350 $200 $200 0.00%
3410 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3415 ADMIN.CHGE. — NON REFD $540 $270 $510 $300 $300 0.00%
3420 ASSESSMENT SEARCH $610 $1,080 $610 $600 $610 1.67%
3421 POLICE REPORTS $652 $534 $503 $594 $563 —5.22%
3422 DOCUMENTS/COPIES $395 $104 $241 $372 $246 —33.87%
3423 CUSTOMER SERVICE $571 $411 $496 $475 $493 3.79%
3424 DOG IMPOUNDING FEES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3490 TREE REMOVAL $0 $0 $4,261 $14,000 $4,000 —71.43%
3475 METER SALES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
TOTAL CURRENT SERVICES $3,268 $3,899 $7,621 $17,366 $7,162 —58.76%
OTHER REVENUES
3901 INVESTMENT INTEREST $75,167 $42,179 $47,768 $34,498 —_ $37,500 8.70%
3911 SALE OF ASSETS $3,953 $1,700 $4,931 $0 $0 0.00%
3912 RESALE OF MATERIALS $707 $161 $370 $0 $0 0.00%
3921 FESTIVAL COMMISSION $6,755 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3931 DONATIONS $2,100 $4,000 $4,150 $0 $0 0.00%
3951 INSURANCE REIMBS $55,711 $21,413 $65,294 $0 $0 0.00%
3961 TRANSFERS $318,787 $268,429 $442,751 $261,637 $338,624 29.43%
3971 FRANCHISE FEES $0 $0 $0 $125,312 $152,341 21.57%
3972 TRANSFER —TIF $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,790 100.00%
3991 OTHER REVENUE $6,395 $5,151 $14,110 $5,773 $5,599 —3.01%
3992 LOAN PROCEEDS ' $0 $93,477 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
TOTAL OTHER REVENUES $469,575 $436,510 $579,374 $427,220 $626,854 46.73%
•
NON — REVENUE '
3820 SURCHARGE $0 $81 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
3850 APPROP — FUND BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $13,405 $42,333 215.80%
3890 OTHER NON—REVENUE $0 $8,080 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
TOTAL NON — REVENUE $0 $8,161 $0 $13,405 $42,333 215.80%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $2,593,268 $2.765,259 $3,005,552 $3,146,310 $3,435,249 9.18%
i
PROPOSED 1995 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1993 1994 1994 DEPARTMENT TEAM
ACTUAL BUDGETED ESTIMATED REQUESTS REQUESTS DIFFERENCE
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
CITY COUNCIL $44,192 $45,603 $0 $60,107 $60,107 $0
ADVISORY COMMISSIONS $657 $1,044 $394 $1,603 $1,603 $0
OFFICE OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR $183,153 $213,286 $0 $125,607 $124,097 ($1,510
HUMAN RESOURCES $27,626 $20,805 $0 $29,435 $27,725 ($1,710
PUBLIC INFORMATION $34,164 $37,617 $0 $55,088 $58,838 $3,750
MANAGEMEMT INFO. SYSTEMS $29,170 $29,857 $0 $84,765 $34,765 ($50,000
ELECTIONS $3,858 $10,847 $0 $10,285 $10,285 $0
FINANCIAL RRT. &AUDITING $49,691 $48,389 $48,389 $58,174 $51,383 ($6,791
BUDGETING $39,599 $39,158 $39,158 $44,879 $41,413 ($3,466
ACCTG &PAYROLL SERVICES $31,016 $37,551 $37,551 $44,638 $39,326 ($5,312
FINANCIAL SERVICES $31,003 $32,657 $32,657 $33,485 $26,110 ($7,375
LEGAL $70,294 $70,500 $70,500 $66,500 $66,500 $0
PLANNING $41,740 $45,980 $45,980 $45,909 $45,209 ($700
ENGINNERING SERVICES $8,527 $12,484 $12,484 $12,622 $8,547 ($4,075
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW $34,587 $42,373 $42,373 $45,723 $45,173 ($550
INSPECTIONS $51,221 $53,075 $53,075 $98,449 $98,424 ($25)
CODE ENFORCEMENT $25,688 $27,304 $27,304 $35,502 $35,502 $0
CENTRAL SERVICES $342,197 $339,749 $352,148 $185,676 $166,226 ($19,450
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT $1,048,383 $1,108,279 $762,013 $1,038,447 $941,233 ($97,214
PUBLIC SAFETY
POLICE ADMINISTRATION $973,955 $195,101 $195,101 $209,581 $206,381 ($3,200
CRIME PREVENTION/DARE $17,400 $18,214 $18,214 $38,474 $17,649 ($20,825
POLICE PATROLS $608,831 $655,313 $655,313 $688,934 $684,419 ($4,515
POLICE INVESTIGATIONS $112,396 $120,238 $120,238 $129,440 $129,440 $0
MANAGEMENT INFO.SYSTEMS $51,529 $64,137 $64,137 $67,006 $63,028 ($3,978
FIRE $0 $155,418 $155,418 $155,418 $155,418 $0
EMERGENCY SERVICES $15,840 $18,356 $18,356 $17,317 $17,317 SO
COMMUNITY $14,357 $17,153 $17,153 $18,244 $18,244 $0
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY $1,794,308 $1,243,930 $1,243,930 $1,324,414 $1,291,896 ($32,518
STREETS & HIGHWAY
STREETS - PAVEMTN MGT $108,501 $196,849 $198,156 $227,051 $198,026 ($29,025
SNOW& ICE CONTROL $55,500 $58,050 $60,475 $70,010 $57,955 ($12,055
SIGN MAINTENANCE $28,035 $25,787 $26,057 $27,768 $27,768 SO
FLEET SERVICES: 50
BLDG &GRNDS MAINTENANCE $32,607 $31,518 $31,592 $71,310 $49,016 ($22,294
SQUAD& STAFF CARS $40,842 $48,592 $52,152 $50,517 $48,117 ($2,400
VEHICLES&EQUIPMENT $17,892 $19,671 $20,343 $20,199 $20,199 $0
TOTAL STREETS & HIGHWAYS $283,377 $380,467 $388,775 $466,855 $401,081 ($65,774
PROPOSED 1995 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1993 1994 1994 DEPARTMENT TEAM
ACTUAL BUDGETED ESTIMATED REQUESTS REQUESTS DIFFERENCE
PARKS & RECREATION
RECREATION ADMINSTRATION $17,878 $18,352 $18,352 $19,691 $19,691 $0
RECREATION PROGRAMMING $49,697 $59,349 $59,349 $72,779 $61,279 ($11,500
RECREATION SALES& MARKETING $27,697 $24,550 $24,550 $30,778 $30,778 $0
PARKS ADMINISTRATION $19,372 $26,554 $26,554 $33,402 $31,402 ($2,000
PARKS IMPROVEMENTS $45,339 $52,768 $52,768 $97,834 $63,434 ($34,400
PARK GEN MAINTENANCE-REPAIR $127,252 $133,671 $133,671 $271,990 $230,482 ($41,508
ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENANCE $8,817 $9,992 $9,992 $10,680 $8,697 ($1,983
TREE DISEASE CONTROL $20,959 $27,299 $27,299 $24,936 $24,936 $0
REFORESTATION-BEAUTIFICATION $12,399 $14,174 $14,174 $15,993 $15,993 $0
GOLF COURSE $0 $25,096 $25,096 $52,341 $52,341 $0
TOTAL PARKS &RECREATION $329,410 $391,805 $391,805 $630,424 $539,033 ($91,391
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
RECRUITMENT & RETENTION $0 $58,547 $0 $78,682 $82,455 $3,773
MARKETING $0 $3,950 $0 $23,423 $20,973 ($2,450
TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $0 $62,497 $0 $102,105 $103,428 $1,323
SOCIAL SERVICES COOODINATION
FAMILY SERVICES $0 $0 $0 $12,500 $13,500 $0
INCREASES (DECREASES) ,
CONTINGENCY $36,950 $50,000 $0 $75,000 $50,000 ($25,000
SALARY ADJ - COLA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
SALARY ADJ - COMP WORTH $27,000 $0 $0 $35,000 $35,000 $0
TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS $47,177 $17,302 $0 $52,578 $52,578 $0
REPAIRS AND BEI I ERMENTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FITNESS PROGRAM $0 $5,760 $0 $7,500 $7,500 $0
TOTAL INC (DEC) $111,127 $73,062 $0 $170,078 $145,078 ($25,000
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $3,566,605 $3,260,040 $2,786,523 $3,744,823 $3,435,249 ($310,574
City of Mounds View 08/23/94
Estimated Schedule of Taxes Levied — 1995
Proposed 1995 Levy 2.3% General levy
Taxes Equalization HACA Due By Local
Funds Certified Aid Aid Taxpayers Tax Rates
General $1,484,632.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,484,632.00 23.994%
Capital notes $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.000%
Fire bonds $94,596.00 $0.00 $0.00 $94,596.00 1.529%
Total $1,579,228.00 0.00 _ 0.00 $1,579,228.00 25.523%
Tax Capacity Valuations: Reconciliation of Tax Levy —_
Real Estate $5,365,455
Personal Property $182,990
Tax Local Amount
Total Tax Capacity $5,548,445 Capacity Tax Rate Levied
Contribution Values (—,) ' ($1,037,754)
Initial FD Dist $1,657,017.00 25.828% $427,974.35
Distribution Values (+) $1,657,017 Local Levy $4,510,691.00 25.523% $1,151,253.65
Adjusted Total Tax Capacity $6,167,708 Total $1,579,228.00
Due By Due from Due by local
Funds Taxpayers Fiscal Dispar. Taxpayers
General $1,484,632.00 $402,338.62 $1,082,293.38
Capital notes $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Fire bonds . $94,596.00 $25,635.73 $68,960.27
Total $1,579,228.00 $427,974.35 $1,151,253.65
I
Tax comparison on selected residential homestead properties 08/23/94
located within the City of Mounds View.
Proposed 1995 Levy 2.3% General levy
1995 Average increase
1994 Tax Capacity Change in in Estimated
Tax Capacity Rate Rate Tax Rate Market Values
25.828% 25.523% -0.31% 2.30%
1994 1995
Estimated 1994 1994 Estimated 1995 1995 Percent
Market Tax Net Market Tax Net Increase Increase
Value Capacity Tax Value Capacity Tax (Decrease) (Decrease)
$51,150.00 $511 .50 $132.11 $52,326 $523.26 $133.55 $1.44 1.09%
$73,656.00 $753.12 $194.52 $75,350 $787.00 $200.86 $6.35 3.26%
$76,725.00 $814.50 $210.37 $78,490 $849.79 $216.89 $6.52 3.10%
$85,932.00 $998.64 $257.93 $87,908 $1,038.17 $264.97 $7.04 2.73%
$97,185.00 $1,223.70 $316.06 $99,420 $1,268.41 $323.73 $7.67 2.43%
$102,300.00 $1,326.00 $342.48 $104,653 $1,373.06 $350.44 $7.96 2.33%
$112,530.00 $1,530.60 $395.32 $115,118 $1,582.36 $403.86 $8.54 2.16%
$127,875.00 $1,837.50 $474.59 $130,816 $1,896.32 $483.99 $9.40 1.98%
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Agenda Section:IIlor13
�� hI
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 94-1292WS
MN
AGENDA SESSION DATE September 7, 1994 Report Date: 8-31-94
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Discussion Regarding Liquor Licensing Requirements
Administrator's Review/Recommendation `M
- No comments to supplement this report 1--- L�`fL
- Comments attached. 1
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
UMMARY;
At the August, 1994, Council Worksession, the City Council was presented with a new method
of determining liquor license fees for establishments affected by the City's on-sale with cabaret
liquor licensing requirements. At this meeting, staff was asked to get an opinion from the City
Attorney to determine if the formula that has been created would be defensible in court, should
that situation arise. As stated in the attached letter, the attorney feels it would be defensible.
For your review, the following calculations were made to determine the fees for each
establishment.
•
DONATELLES
BAR AREA • $.65/sq. ft. x 891 sq. ft. = $579.15
DINING AREA • $.53/sq. ft. x 4280 sq. ft. = $2268.40
NEW TOTAL FOR DONETELLES = $2,847.55/yr. (minimum $3,000)
OLD TOTAL FOR DONETELLES = $6,984/yr.
ROBERT'S
BAR AREA • $.65/sq. ft. x 7,262 sq. ft. = $4,720.30
NEW TOTAL FOR ROBERT'S = $4,720.30
OLD TOTAL FOR ROBERT'S = $8,639.70
MERMAID
BAR AREA • $.65/sq. ft. x 18,292 sq. ft. = $11,889.80
DINING AREA • $.53/sq. ft. x 2243 sq. ft. = $1,211.22
NEW TOTAL FOR MERMAID = $13,101/yr. ($10,000 cap)
OLD TOTAL FOR MERMAID = $10,000 cap
RECOMMENDATION; 'il 60
Tim Cruikshank, Asst. to City Admin.
Currently, there is a $10,000 maximum. The only establishment affected by this is the
Mermaid.
It has also been proposed that the suggested $2,500 minimum be increased to $3,000. The
only establishment affect by this is Donatelle's.
By changing the liquor license fee structure to the proposed formula including the minimum and
the maximum fees, the City would experience a decrease in revenues. In 1993, the City
collected $25,623.70 in liquor license fees from these three establishments. If the Council
adopted this new liquor license fee structure, the City would collect $17,720.30, a difference
of $7,903.40.
HOLMES & GRAVEN
CHARTERED
Attorneys at Law
470 Pillsbury Center,Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402
ROBERT A.ALSOP (612)337-9300 ROBERT C.LONG
RONALD H.BATTY LAURA K.MOLLET
STEPHEN J.BUBUL Facsimile(612)337-9310 BARBARA L.PORTWOOD
JOHN B.DEAN JAMES M.STROMMEN
MARY G.DOBBINS JAMES J.THOMSON,JR.
STEFANIE N.GALEY LARRY M.WERTHEIM
CORRINE A.HEINE BONNIE L.WILKINS
JAMES S.HOLMES WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL GARY P.WINTER
DAVID J.KENNEDY (612)337.9215 DAVID L.GRAVEN(1929.1991)
JOHN R.LARSON
WELLINGTON H.LAW OF COUNSEL
CHARLES L.LEFEVERE ROBERT C.CARLSON
JOHN M.LEFEVRE,JR. ROBERT L.DAVIDSON
ROBERT J.LINDALL T.JAY SALMEN
August 8, 1994
Tim Cruikshank
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112-1499
RE: Proposed Liquor License Fees
Dear Tim:
You have asked for my comment on the staff report for an August 1, 1994 agenda relating to a
proposed liquor license fee amendment. As you know, the legislature has amended Minnesota
Statutes, § 340A.408, subd. 2 to provide that the fee for intoxicating liquor on-sale licenses "...
is intended to cover the costs of issuing and inspecting and other directly related costs of
enforcement." This change is not particularly significant since cities may not generally use fees
as a revenue measure. That is, most, if not all, license or permit fees of the city are subject to
the limitation that the amount of the fee must be reasonably related to the cost of administering,
licensing, enforcing, and the like. The city should be able to sustain any fee that generally meets
this standard.
It would appear from the staff report that the total amount of fees which will be collected for
liquor licenses is justifiable by actual costs associated with issuance and enforcement of the
license. The remaining issue, then, is whether the formula suggested for allocating those fees
among licensees is justifiable.
As an economic regulation, the formula need only have a rational basis. That is, it cannot be
arbitrary or irrational. Again, it seems to me that the proposed formula meets this test.
Therefore, in my opinion, the fee schedule and formula proposed are reasonable and lawful. If
you have any further questions, please give me a call.
Very truly yours,
Charles L. LeFevere
CLL:ckr
CLL74242
MU125-11
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 3•
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 94-1282WS
AGENDA SESSION DATE SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 Report Date: 9-7-94
DISPOSITION •
Item Description: Discussion of Wolf and Associates Development
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this repo. E�
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
UMMARY;
In late July, the City Council granted approval for a facility expansion
to Wolf and Associates, 4860 Mustang Circle. At that time, use of the
former water tower site immediately East of the Wolf site was discussed.
Wolf and Associates asked that the City consider either selling, giving or
leasing the property to them to use as a part of their overall site
development. The Council eventually agreed to lease the property to Wolf
and Staff was directed to work with the City Attorney on drafting a
workable lease agreement.
Since the Council approval was given, Wolf and Associates have reviewed
their needs and would like to again approach the City Council with a plan
to purchase the property. Staff will be meeting with the representatives
of Wolf and Associates on Thursday, September 1 to further discuss the
issue. Any formal action on the sale of the property would need to be
approved by the Council. All parties will be in attendance at the Work
Session to discuss the results of the meeting with Staff.
Paul Harrington, Community Developme Coordinator
•
RECOMMENDATIONt
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 6.
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 94-1285WS
AGENDA SESSION DATE SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 Report Date: 9-7-94
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Update on Housing Inventory
Administrator's Review/Recommendati. :
- No comments to supplement this r•port • -ryes
lti4C,
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
As requested, thefollowing is a brief update on the progress of the
Housing Stock Analysis.
To date, Jennifer has inspected 2500 of the more than 2800 single family
homes in Mounds View. These inspections included "rating" the homes'
condition on factors such as foundation, roof, windows, trim, siding, etc.
It is anticipated that the remaining 300-plus homes will be ccanpleted
by mid September.
In addition to the field inspections, information available from the County
has been obtained and entered into a database for use with the City
Geographic Information System (GIS) . The information obtained form the
County includes year built, market value, construction types, number of
rooms, etc. This database, along with the GIS, will allow Staff to create
maps which graphically illustrate different housing conditions within the
City.
Several other Cities have been contacted to discuss studies they have done
and, programs they currently have in place for rehabilitation. Also, Staff
has contacted the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and Ramsey County to
research what funding mechanisms are available for City use.
Following the completion of the inspections, Staff will begin the process
of analyzing the available data, formulating conclusions based on the
interpretation of that data and, writing the final report which will be
presented to the City Council at the end of the year.
If you have any additional questions, Staff will be available to answer
those at the Wzs Session.
L------
Paul Harrington, Community D elopment Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION;
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 5.
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 94-1284WS
AGENDA SESSION DATE SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 Report Date: 9-7-94
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Discussion of Parking Issues at Multi—Family Resources
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this repo, i. }j, �'
- Comments attached. `�
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
ST JMMARYz
Earlier this summer, Staff was approached by two different residents of
apartment complexes asking that the 2 A.M. to 6 A.M. on-street parking ban
be lifted for their particular residences. In response to this request,
Staff conducted a survey of all complexes in the City and their available
parking. The results were as follows:
GARAGE GROUND TOTAL TOTAL SPACES/
SPACES SPACES SPACES UNITS UNIT
TIMBERLAND RIDGE 23 70 93 46 2 . 02
LANDMARK ESTATES 134 216 350 132 2 . 65
JACKSON APTS. 12 18 30 17 1. 76
THE SANDS 48 124 172 91 1.89
M.V. ESTATES 0 114 114 64 1.78
GREENFIELD APTS. 136 160 296 126 2 . 35
WOODLAWN APTS. 100 81 181 113 1. 60
7664 WOODLAWN 10 15 25 10 2 . 50
PLEASANT WOOD APTS. 28 46 74 40 1.85
SILVER VIEW TERRACE 16 33 49 23 2 . 13
SILVER WOOD APTS. 40 52 92 40 2 . 30
SCOTLAND GREEN 88 540 628 385 1. 63
WILDWOOD MANOR 0 41 41 40 1. 03
BRENTWOOD TERRACE 10 30 40 17 2 . 35
Paul Ha rington, Community D- elopment Coordinator
STAFF REPORT
PAGE TWO
SEPTEMBER 7, 1994
The information on parking at each complex is provided to give the
Council a perspective on the parking needs and availability at each
complex. The Mounds View Municipal Code currently requires a
minimum of 2 .5 parking spaces per unit in multi-family zoning
districts.
One of the areas of concern to Staff is just North of City Hall on
Edgewood Drive. A number of cars have been, on occasion, parked on
grass areas surrounding the buildings. One of the residents who
approached Staff earlier this summer is a resident of that area.
The Edgewood Drive resident will be in attendance at the Work
Session to discuss the issue with the Council.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 3. (EDC)
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 9 —1z 7ws
AGENDA SESSION DATE SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 Report Date: 9-7-9
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Consideration of Resolution Approving Appointment of Economic Development
Commission Chairperson
Administrator's Review/Recommendation.
- No comments to supplement this re..rte%
Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplem•nt,_sheet's as necessary.)
FIZMMARY;
At the first regular meeting of the Economic Development Commission (EDC) on August 25, 1994, the members unanimous
elected Delane Welsch as Chairperson of the Commission.
Under Municipal Code Chapter 408.07, Subdivision 1 entitled Economic Development Commission, Organization it is required
that "at the first regular meeting of the year, the Commission shall appoint a chairperson from among its voting members and
that this appointment shall be subject to Authority approval and shall consist of a one year term".
For your review, the attached resolution approves the appointment of Delane Welsch as Chairperson of the EDC.
i,e/VAL4
.L/41 //
Cathy ennett, E.4 o 1-c Development ordinator
RI,ECOMMENDATION;
RESOLUTION NO. 94-EDA15
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF THE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ELECTED CHAIRPERSON
WHEREAS, the City Council, on behalf to the Economic Development
Authority, has approved the establishment of an Economic Development Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Municipal Code Chapter 408.07, Subdivision 1 entitled
Economic Development Commission. Organization states that "at the first regular meeting of
the year, the Commission shall appoint a chairperson from among its voting members and that
this appointment shall be subject to Authority approval and shall consist of a one year term";
and
WHEREAS, through a unanimous vote of the Economic Development
Commission members on August 25, 1994, Delane Welsch was appointed chairperson of the
Economic Development Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Economic Development
Authority of the City of Mounds View hereby approves the appointment of Delane Welsch as
chairperson of the Economic Development Commission.
Adopted this 12th day of September, 1994.
ATTEST:
President
(SEAL)
Executive Director
IT
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 11.
�' —
STAFF REPORT Report Number:
AGENDA SESSION DATE SEPTEMBER 7. 1994
Report Date: 9-7-99441290WS
DISPOSITION
Item Description:
Discussion on 1994 LTFP
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report -
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY:
This item was tabled at the August 29th Council meeting for discussion at
the September Work Session.
S mantha 0 •uno, iC ty Admi istrator
1ECOMMENDATION;
:F
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: lo.
aims 94-1289WS
STAFF REPORT Report Number:
EN
AGENDA SESSION DATE September 7, 1994 Report Date: 8-31-94
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Consideration of Assessment of Policy
Administrator's Review/Recommendation: -
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
As mentioned at previous work sessions it has become apparent that the City
of Mounds View should develop and adopt an assessment policy. Staff has
received a few policies from different cities, and is reviewing them at
this time. Each city has what seems to be a customized policy, depending
on their needs. Staff is awaiting information from the League of Cities for
any sample policies, or guidelines to start from. Included with this staff
report are assessment statements from some cities. They will provide
council with a little background on what is available.
A rough example of Pleasant View Drive reconstruction project is provided
using the entire street as if it received no aid.
Project Bid Price: $118,297 (does not inc. engineering
expenses or legal fees)
13 properties with frontage
3 properties with long side frontage
16 total assessable properties
Assuming a 50% assessment of the total cost of the project by 16
properties, each property owner would be assessed $3 , 697. General taxes or
' some other funding mechanism would then be responsible for $59, 149. Bear
in mind that these figures are based on only 1/2 mile of street, and only
one side. This however is not an accurate figure because it lacks the
additional expenses mentioned above. The current estimated assessment for
a 100 foot frontage lot is approximately $1, 000, which includes curb and
gutter ($5 per foot) , and storm sewer at $500 (maximum $600) . The curb
costs are accurate, but the storm sewer is $6,500 short. There is no
assessment on the road itself on this project, leaving the city the
remaining $102 ,297 to pay for.
"1/41,2---d:tv/
Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works
RECOMMENDATION;
STAFF REPORT
PAGE TWO
SEPTEMBER 7, 1994
As you can see an assessment policy is something that deserves a
great deal of thought. Staff will review the policies received, to
simplify the percentages and present them to council at the work
session. The city will need to address long side lots, odd shaped
lots, commercial lots, undeveloped plots, and tax exempt properties
to name a few. Staff seeks council's comments and direction in this
matter.
If you have any questions or comments before the meeting please
contact me. I will be on vacation that week but probably home for
the first part of the week.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 7_
- J Jy J 94-1286WS
STAFF REPORT Report Number:
AGENDA SESSION DATE SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 Report Date: 9-7-94
DISPOSITION
Item Description:
Discussion of Subdivision Regulations
Administrator's Review/R.ecommendatio •
- No comments to supplement this report 41141)-#4...)- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
TIMMARY;
Following the approval of the C.G. Hill project plat (Mounds View
Business Park East Building M Addition) in June, Staff asked the
City Attorney if the Subdivision Regulations contained in the
Municipal Code could be amended to require subdividers of property
to include all contiguously-owned property in a plat application.
As you will recall, only a portion of the property owned by Everest
Development was included in the Hill application. The remainder of
the property was listed as an "exception" .
The language contained in the attached Ordinance would amend the
Code to require the inclusion of all contiguously-owned property in
the plat application.
Staff is seeking Council direction on this matter.
7 L / 2 / .
Paul Harrington, Community Devel ment Coordinator
•
•
RECOMMENDATION;
J
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY
AND WELFARE, REQUIRING ALL CONTIGUOUSLY OWNED
UNPLATTED PROPERTY TO BE INCLUDED IN ALL
SUBDIVISIONS, ADDING A DEFINITION OF OUTLOT AND
AMENDING TITLE 1100, CHAPTER 1102, SECTION 1102.02
AND TITLE 1200, CHAPTER 1202, SECTION 1202.02,
SUBDIVISION 2 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY CODE
THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council finds that it is in the best interest of
the public to require subdividers and owners of property to include all contiguously
owned property when submitting a plat application for property that is previously
unplatted. This requirement is necessary in order for the City to properly plan for
the orderly development of property within its boundaries and to ensure that
subdividers consider the effect that present development has on potential future
development of adjoining properties.
Sec. 2. Section 1202.02, Subdivision 2, of the Mounds View City Code is
amended by adding the following paragraph:
c. The application must include all contiguous land
owned by the subdivider or owner, unless the
application is a replat of property that has been
previously platted. If only a portion of the
property to be subdivided is planned to be
presently developed, the remainder of the land may
be platted as an outlot. The subdivider or owner
must submit a schematic demonstrating how the
property that is not currently planned for
development could be developed consistent with the
City's regulations.
Sec. 3. 4The introductory clause to Section 1102.02 of the Mounds View City
Code is amended to read as follows:
DEFINITIONS: The following words and terms, wherever
they occur in this ale Code, shall be defined as follows:
Sec. 4. Section 1102.02 of the Mounds View City Code is amended by adding
a new subdivision to read:
Subd. 81a. OUTLOT. A parcel of land included in a plat
or subdivision which is: (1) smaller than the minimum lot
size and therefore unbuildable until combined through
platting or subdivision with additional land; (2) not
presently proposed for development and therefore subject
JJT72746
MU125-14
to future platting or subdivision prior to development; or
(3) designated for public or private open space, right-of-
way, utilities or other similar purpose.
Sec. 5. This ordinance is effective thirty days after its publication.
Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of
, 1994.
Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day
of , 1994.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk-Administrator
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
JJT72766
MU125-14
Agenda Section:
outsD REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number:
STAFF REPORT Report Date:
VL�`r Council Action:
❑ Special Order of Business
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE 0 Public Hearings
0 Consent Agenda
0 Council Business
Item Description:
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
UMMARYt
Tonight the City staff are presenting the Council with a Resolution of Intent to Dismiss Cheryl Sutton
from employment with the City of Mounds View. As per State law, it is necessary to officially close
the meeting to discuss the preliminary grounds for the proposed dismissal. Upon conclusion of the
discussion, the meeting must be formally reopened to either approve or disapprove the attached
Resolution of Intent to Dismiss.
i"�
`moi ., L -64744,
-
Samantha • dun., Clerk-Adm -'strator
RECOMMENDATION
RESOLUTION NO. 4634
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO DISMISS CHERYL SUTTON FROM
EMPLOYMENT WITH THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
WHEREAS, during a closed portion of the September 7 and 12, 1994 City Council
meetings, the City Council gave preliminary consideration of the grounds for the possible
dismissal of Ms. Cheryl Sutton; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the information submitted at those
meetings.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council in and for the City
of Mounds View does hereby determine that sufficient grounds exist for dismissal of
Cheryl Sutton from employment with the City of Mounds View.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City Council does hereby approve this
Resolution of Intent to Dismiss.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City Council does hereby direct the Clerk-
Administrator to serve Cheryl Sutton with a NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISMISS.
Adopted this 12th day of September, 1994.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
City Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. 4635
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FORM OF THE CITY PORTION
OF THE NOVEMBER 8, 1994 GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT
WHEREAS, the City has been requested by the Charter Commission
to place on the November 8, 1994 General Election Ballot the
following question:
Shall the Mounds View City Charter be amended to add the following
provision?
Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, no
person may file to be a candidate for election to a term that
would cause the person to serve more than eight total years
in the office of Mayor or eight total years in the office of
City Council.
;and
WHEREAS, the City touncil, under Minnesota Statutes, Section
410. 12 , Subdivision 4, has the authority to "fix the form of the
ballot" .
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council in and for
the City of Mounds View does hereby fix the November 8, 1994
General Election Ballot to be in the form as designated herein as
Exhibit A.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City Council does hereby
direct the Clerk Administrator to notify all required County
officials of the City of Mounds View's intent to include on the
ballot the language outlined in Exhibit A.
Adopted this 12th day of September, 1994 .
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL) :
Clerk-Administrator
EXHIBIT A
BALLOT LANGUAGE FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENT
TO MOUNDS VIEW CiTY CHARTER
Shall the Mounds View City Charter be amended to add the following provision?
Section 2.09. Term Limits. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law to the contrary, no person may file to be
a candidate for election to a term that would cause the
person to serve more than eight total years in the office of
Mayor or eight total years in the office of City Council.
D YES
ONO
Instructions: Put an "X" in the square before the word "YES' if you desire to vote
for the question, or put an "X" before the word "NO" if you desire to vote against
the question.