HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1994/09/26 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
SEPTEMBER 26, 1994
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in
advance by staff and appointed commissions, committees and boards. Decisions
are based on this information, as well as City policy and practices, input
from constituents and a Councilmember's personal judgement. If you have
comments, questions or information regarding an item on the agenda, please
step forward to be recognized by the Mayor during the "Residents Requests and
Comments From the Floor" item on the agenda. Please state your name and
address for the record. All comments are appreciated. A copy of all printed
materials relating to the agenda item is available for public inspection at
the Recording Secretary's Table.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL - Linke
Quick Trude
Wuori Blanchard
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA:
Item 1:
Item 2:
Item 3:
AGENDA
PAGE TWO
SEPTEMBER 26, 1994
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
a. September 12, 1994 Regular Council Meeting
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
6. ACCEPTANCE OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES:
There are no Advisory Commission Minutes to accept.
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
7. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
There was no special order of business scheduled for tonight's meeting.
8. CONSENT AGENDA:
A. Adopt Resolution No. 4636 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against
City Funds
B. Licenses for Approval
Sewer/Water - Expires 6/30/95
Stevens Drilling and Environmental Serv., Inc. - New
HVAC - Expires 6/30/95
HCO Heating and Air Conditioning - New
ASPHALT - Expires 6/30/95
Northern Asphalt Const., Inc. - Renewal
AGENDA
PAGE THREE
SEPTEMBER 26, 1994
GENERAL (COMMERCIAL) - Expires 6/30/95
Callahan Construction - New
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
9. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR
Citizens' comments are encouraged to allow individual citizens to
address the Council, as a whole, on a matter of interest or concern to
the citizens. The preservation of the Citizens' Comments item on the
agenda is important in order to encourage and maintain this information
flow. To preserve and protect this valuable communications link, a
speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL
NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
10. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
7:05 P.M. - To Consider Request for Conditional Use Permit, 8425 Spring Lake
Road, Staff Report No. 94-1306 (Staff Presenter: Paul Harrington,
Community Development Coordinator)
Consideration of Resolution No. 4638 Approving a
Conditonal Use Permit for 8425 Spring Lake Road
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
AGENDA
PAGE FOUR
SEPTEMBER 26, 1994
11. COUNCIL BUSINESS:
A. Consideration of Clean-Up Day Fees, Staff Report No. 94-1307C (Staff
Presenter: Paul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
B. Consideration of Development Review Request, Crouse Cartage
Company, Planning Case No. 399-94, Staff Report No. 94-1308C (Staff
Presenter: Paul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
C. Consideration of Adoption of Ordinance No. 548, "Land Subdivisions",
Staff Report No. 94-1309C (Staff Presenter: Paul Harrington, Community
Development Coordinator)
ROLL CALL VOTE
Mayor Linke
Councilmember Wuori
Councilmember Blanchard
Councilmember Quick
Councilmember Trude
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
AGENDA
PAGE FIVE
SEPTEMBER 26, 1994
D. Consideration of Preliminary Plat, Sherwood Estates, Planning Case
No. 387-94, Staff Report No. 94-1310C (Staff Presenter: Paul Harrington,
Community Development Coordinator)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
E. Consideration of Resolution No. 4637 Creating a Recycling Intern
Position, Staff Report No. 94-1311C (Staff Presenter: Tim Cruikshank,
Assistant to the City Administrator)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
F. Consideration of Resolution No. 4641 Requesting Ramsey County to
Pursue the Feasibility of a School Speed Zone on County Road I, Staff
Report No. 94-1312C (Staff Presenter: Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City
Administrator)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
12. REPORTS:
1. Report of Councilmembers:
Quick:
Blanchard
AGENDA
PAGE SIX
SEPTEMBER 26, 1994
(Report of Councilmembers - continued)
Wuori:
Trude:
2. Report of Mayor Linke:
3. Report of Administrator:
4. Report of Staff:
5. Report of Attorney:
NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION: OCTOBER 3, 1994
NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: OCTOBER 10, 1994
13. ADJOURNMENT:
Agenda Section: 10, 7:05
O Gv s REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 94-1306u
Report Date: 9-22-94
ir
Ly�:- STAFF REPORT Council Action:
0 Special Order of Business
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE September 76. 1994 50
Public Hearings
0 Consent Agenda
0 Council Business
Item Description: Consideration of Request for Conditional Use Permit, 8425 Spring Lake Road
Resolution No. 4638
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this repo
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
,SUMMARY;
In July of this year, Brady Nuemann made application for a Conditional Use
Permit to allow the construction of a 576 square foot addition onto his
existing 576 square foot garage. The Mounds View Municipal Code allows
garages up to 1264 square feet with the issuance of a Conditional Use
Permit. As submitted, Mr. Neumann's request met all requirements of the
Municipal Code for issuance of the Permit, however, the Code stipulates
that in the event a garage exceeds 1000 square feet (which the applicants'
would have with the proposed addition) no other accessory buildings would
be allowed on the property (Chapter 1106. 04 Subdivision 6 c) . The property
also contained an 8'x 8' accessory building.
[ '
Mr. Nuemann was informed that in order to meet the intent of the Code, the
existing accessory building would need to be removed in the event the
Conditional Use Permit was granted. Following discussion at the Planning
Commission, Mr. Nuemann decided to remove the existing 8'x 8' structure and
increase the size of the addition to his garage. Based on these
discussions, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 400-94
recommending approval of an addition -..to Mr. Nuemann's garage which would
bring the total square footage of the structure to no more than 1264 square
feet.
All materials received as part of this application have been included for
your review. Staff has prepared the attached City Council Resolution for
consideration. All conditions contained in the Planning Commission
recommendation have been included.
D
/ ....
,.� /
4":11 Harrington, Communi , Development Coordinator .
RECOMMENDATION;
Adopt Resolution No. 4638 approving a Conditional Use Permit for Brady
Nuemann, 8425 Spring Lake Road. ,
I _I
n I o ' m BO � N J�Q
"0� n n j I ,0j 848 84931 N N 9490 8499 I 8490 N 849 j 8494. j3495 8494 F
I 8482 8485 • 8484 8489 8480 848 N N 8484 N N 8490
\848 8477 8480 8479 847 8485 8484
` 8462\ 8461 8468 8469 I 8474 8469 8470 8465 I 8470 8474 8475 8474
0 9 8470 8460 846j 8480
845 8457+ o 1 84 :460 846.3 8456 8461 I 3460/ 345 8456 8465 8464
8454 - 8455 .c• 8459 1 8450 8455 1 8440 gµ1, G 8455 8454
3444 84411 •442 8449 8� 8445 8444 8432 8444 8443 8444
7 8434 8431 8436 8439 8438 8431 8431 8435 8434
843 ► ; 8424 I 8434 -
342 6421 8430 • 8429 8432 8425 8425 8424
� 841 8411 8421 8423 8426 8419 I 8400
M. M 8418 j 8415 I 8420 8415 8414
3402 O 84011 8419 8419 1 3420 8409 1 3392
J-w' 8401 I 8406 8405 8404
8392 83911 8407 10 8415 I 3414' 88401�n 1 , 18384
i-r I 8390 8389 I 8394 8408 8409 1 8408 8391 m'2 ,.8378 8389 8400 8379 8390
3386 8384
▪` 8387 8391 8400 8401 8398 G_•,a 8379 ! 9380 8373
1 8380 8391 8388 y 0 83T 8372 8370
8380 83851 /_ 8387 8382 8381 I 9378 '37� �!� 8366 8365f I 8360
• 1 y 3370 5 8371 I 4374 8383 8372 8371 I 8368{ 8369\aDqm 'm 18360 8355 1 8368 • i 8350 f
8368 8371 I q 8354 8345 I 8364 8345 8340
-51
8368 8351 834 8365 t
a 8360 8360 W 8359 ( 1835
i 8340 8331 8330 I
4 8360 8344 8351 8346 8335
9350 8347
83551 8340 8358 8341 8343 8342 83251 8312 8315 8320
8340 83451 8335 8334 8339 J 4334 8335 I 3332_ 8303 8310 WI
8315 I 9300
,, 8330 8336 8325O 8333 0!
83351 3330 3 I 8330 8333 ( 8290 f
✓
8305 4 8290 8295
a 8320 83251 8315 I 8322 0O 8321 ! 3300 8285 1 8280 !
1 8316 { 8287 1 8280 41
r
f 3310 8375 1 8311 1 3308 Y 8311 g' 8275 1 8270 W 8281 8270 u7)
3300 8305 1 3312 8297 8298 8301 1 GROVELAND 8265 i 3260 8273 I 8260
1" 8289 8285 PARK 8255 1 3250 8267 I 3250
ti 3284 8285 1 3290 _
f' • 32801 8275 1 8281 I 8250 82611 1 ^I n I I 1_ 18240 8261 8240
a: 1 1 FZ- 8270 8265 I 3230 82411 N 1 mN�30C n .
• LL 8270 a 8265 I ,— ARpAN
N( NI NIN 1623Q 8255 I;')
AVE
a 3260 2 8255 8248 0 ? 1 3 1 0 o r:: v < 1 �+ o .<61-
k
''''',3' o
N 1 71 CO CO N I NI N -'.J m i m N 16244 N 117;11' 12 cmVN I N I N N �N1NI8210
20
8250 8245J�-1 I 8210 8211
I 8240 PLE'.n 8233 13228! 8245 I 8206 8227 i
4.
▪ 1 823 b• ! 1 � I 3202 I,^�1 ` „ 13200 r
82 8235? 8213 f 3210 '8217 1 1 I 8198 3205 N 1 N 1 N 1. N 1
FA . 8201 1
',i 25 8198– 8191 I 1 8192 a 8203 1 /8208 DR
:22 ,81.. - 8177 1 8200 I
Z1,2,20 N I n i ° m"11P '�0 1 8775 m
:12:c� 812 3180 8175 I 3160 a I N•I N 8200 N 1 N N NN 8165
W_ I 1 1814E 8155 g�
•
8148 > LAPORTIt G
:t2.81717 ' 8160 i O IN =1 ., 0 1 1 8142 8145 Urso
815E 3138 m m m gig e
Op01 815E 4161 ( N i N I N 1 N��N'-� I 8135 ` l
1 3132 '3127 1 !1 1 : 1 81251 8130 8137
.a ; ) i 1 I 1 311 ....I' m! ^ !rni �ni i TI ! N Ini „ 1n1
1 1 1 �I a1 I�+ 3i �1rI � I ^ al2l ,121 °1
'41 ,' Q n1 31411 ' 1, I diQ6 N I N N I N N NIN 1 =`N :V N N INI N
A : 1 1 810
Olt -�� 7 ,�I^ 9 I m O 1 '2 ' m
7 41 1 f 908Q =2!m I N 1 N, m f N N`8080 80811 i CC N N 18088
f I li 65 {3084 80851 3070 8071 I 3066
3060 8065
" I 8040 8075 8060 8059 1 8050
> 8045 350043664 8045 8040 8042
.} •
n/ .... J, 0 180301 8039 8032
LL �/ NI ( aoz6 8026 I 8028
N18020 8025 8015 1 8025 8018
co,I 8016 8005 80161 3009 8006
)-- 7980 5005 8000 3" !
y Z • 179904i 7985 8004 7981 l 7990 C�
( �} • 1 798a 4. 7975 7970 7979 1 7980
4 ' v 'n A, ' 7960 O 7959 7970
a N 1 '10 n� i 79601 7965
5 �1I I N 1 79501 7955 1 7956 7949 7954
1 ! N p
940
y i N I. 7934 7933 7950
7930
A 7932
1 rnl
:'.'1 1 JO i�l � I 7900
1 '897 I '92Q -3.
N �N 1 N 17900 7901
m HILLVIEW
T;:::
®�% 78357890 ii-
111' 0 78251 7664 879 I 1 7660 7461 1 + 1N c 7876 >
781 7615 7870 7865 o I '864 7635 I i INN \ 7870
1780776 780 7860�,785, 1 17850( 7321 \ 1\
•
= CITT OF MOUNDS V!EW
PLA: IM ?1.ICATICN
AFFUCANT: Phone 75 - 2G�
ADDRESS: 6 � •
/eZ) /4 -- //G
Street Address, City, Stat-, and Zp Code
•
Interest in Property (check appropriate box):
`- Owner of Property
❑ Contract for Deed Owner
O Lessee, Operator, Manager
❑ Agreement to Purchase -
❑ Other (explain)
•
Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before final City action of this request
PROPERTY INVOLVED: ����
Address/General Location X412-4 , (A
Legal Description or Property Identification Number
Legal Owner: Name/Address
/
Present Use (check appropriate box):
❑
UndevelopedNacant
A., Single Family Dwelling •
❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling
❑ Multi-Family (No. of Units
❑ Business/Commercial Establishment
❑ Industrial Establishment
❑ Other (explain)
Property Classification: Q Abstract Q Torrens
REQUEST: g(-6/ _ ,Q-<": � .r
*Please note: Applicant may be responsible for additional fees associated with the review of this requesr.
I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUE.
• Signature / k--
Rezoning 5200/acre.minimum$200.maximum x1,000 Park Fund Dedication Fee
Variance R-1 to R-2-SS75, ail others$200 Date?aid
c.anomonal use Perml) R-1 to R-2-$75, ail others$200 Receipt Number ;
GJdE appeal
$75
Develop./Site Plan Review 5100/acre,minimum 100,maximum $500 Total Fees Paid
Minor Subdivision S150 Date Paid -=3
Major Subdivision 5250 Pius $250 deposit Receipt Number ✓�:�' '
Camp. Plan Amendment $200
Wetland Alteration Permit 550 plus deposit determined by Staff Additional Fee Paid
Wetland Buffer Permit 310 Date Paid
Planning Sign S50 Receipt Number
PUD S350
PUO Amendment 5150 Date of final action
APPROVED _ CENIED 1-7
Date // / '`-- Planning Case No. i Admin. Acccunt No.
CIT`! OF MOUNDS VIEW
.i.UILLING + AriTi'rENi
PLOT PLAN
ADDRESS S7:1<-45 __52/7,f,,�„�,. /," A) BLDG. PERMIT #
i
BUILDING/OWNER .410.- ,..0/ y, _ - DATE F ���
BRIE= DESCRIPTIOPROPOSED CONSTRUCTIO'`N:
..."1:/-' (-__t...44'12.--r..---- (-#:-.4...--) .C.---.. -zieje_____6
U /
•
- Show all existing buildings/structures located on property.
- Show ail'proposed construction and label "proposed".
- Indicate distance from proposed structures to all property lines.
- Indicate distance of proposed structure(s) to existing structures.
- Show street locations(s) and name(s). N
(Note attached example) W * E
S
i
I
i
i
- - -----.7.,n1
_7_,........„____.i............=„ir._ ,......... dt to. i
1
1 .
I G a i w'-'76 i VT t'r"_ AJ., 1
•
r__Likixn 5 , I
I
I .�- ,_� —71f 1
j/7
.
1-4
I
ice,
(-J
J
• 't'
RESOLUTION NO. 4638
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO ALLOW AN OVERSIZED GARAGE FOR BRADY NEUMANN,
8425 SPRING LAKE ROAD, PLANNING CASE NO. 395-94
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the
request of Brady Neumann for an oversized garage; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Zoning Ordinance allows, by
conditional use permit, up to 1, 264 square feet of garage square
footage on one lot; and
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a garage not to
exceed 1, 264 square feet, which is the maximum allowed; and
WHEREAS, the proposed building meets all applicable
setback requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has
reviewed the request and recommended approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
City Council approves the requested Conditional Use Permit for an
oversized garage, not to exceed 1,264 square feet, by Brady
Neumann, 8425 Spring Lake Road, contingent upon the following:
a) The conditional use permit be recorded with Ramsey
County.
b) The building be designed and maintained to provide a
uniform appearance with the dwelling unit.
c) That an 8 'x 8 ' accessory building currently located on
the property be removed prior to construction of the
garage addition.
Adopted this 26th day of September, 1994
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
City Administrator
Agenda Sermon:J 1 .A
nrior
,.---. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSME.XATIO Repot_Yu er.94-1 BOAC
S�A '- , ��,� Repot c Date: A—� —A4
Coundi Amon:
C Special Order of 3usres
CITY COUNCIL 31ZIEETMTG DATE September 26, 1994 0 public Hearings
0 Consent Agenda
g Council Business
Item Description: Consideration of Clean—Up Day Fees
Administrator's Review,Recaminendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
ExplanationiSummarj (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) .
)5,7T jARX:
•
Staff has tentatively scheduled a Fall Clean-Up Day for Saturday, October .
22, 1994, from 9: 00 a.m. to ;3 : 00 p.m. As in the Spring of this year, Twin
City Refuse, working in conjunction with Keith Krupenny & Son Disposal,
will be providing collection services. Staff received a number of
compliments on the pleasant and efficient manner in which Twin City Refuse
conducted the Spring Clean-Up Day and felt it would be appropriate to
retain their services again. The attached fee schedule outlines the terms
of the Clean-Up Day.
Please note that materials included in the base fees ("pickup load", "car
load" , etc. ) include branches, brush, construction waste, metals, and ,
general junk/debris items. Prices quoted for appliances, tires, etc. are
fees in addition to the base fees. These user fees represent the complete
' cost of Clean-Up Day. No General Fund revenues will be used to fund this
event. _
Put Harrington, Community i velopment Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion for City Council to approve Clean-Up Day terms with Twin City
Refuse.
Twin C0it PHONE
Y (612)227-1549
REFUSE&RECYCLING
TRANSFER STATION 318 W.WATER ST.
SINCE 1973 ST.PAUL,MINNESOTA 55107
Twin City Refuse will provide services for the October 22, 1994 fall cleanup for the city of
Moundsview.
The resident will pay the following prices as they enter the cleanup site:
Pickup load(level) - $35.00
Trailer(4' * 8' * 4') $35.00
Minivan load $20.00
Station Wagon Load $15.00
Car load $ 8.00
Box spring(any size) $10.00
Mattress (any size) $10.00
Couch $10.00
Stuffed chairs $ 6.00
Appliances $ 7.00
Appliances with freon $15.00
Car tires $ 1.50
No hazardous waste will be accepted and we reserve the right to refuse anything we may feel is
hazardous.
o The hours of the cleanup will be from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
o We will require someone from the city to be on hand as an official representative of
Moundsview.
o We will need the gates open by 6:00 a.m. on October 22 so we have sufficient time to set up
our equipment.
o The site of the cleanup will be clean by the end of the day.
o We will also provide at least six extra employees to assist at the cleanup.
Thank you again,
Twin City Refuse
Jim Karas
An environmentally concerned company
• _ Agenda Sec—'on: 11.B
Ill
�.w.. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDEKATIOiti Resor.Nua:::er.94-1 i0R('
rS::�1
STAFF� R PORT Rapor Date: 9-22-94
:�..? Courci Acton:
C Special Order of Busines
September 26, 1994 o Public earngs
CITY COUNCIL EEMNG DATE
C Consent Agenda
t Council Business
Item Description: Consideration of Development Review Request, Crouse Cartage Company
Administrator's RaviewiRecommendatian-
- No comments to supplement this re •
- Comments attached.
E:c?lanationiSummary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
, T fM ..Ryz
The Crouse Cartage Company, an Iowa-based trucking firm, has made
application for development review for site improvements they anticipate
making at 2169 Mustang Drive. The project calls for the surfacing of
approximately 90, 000 square feet of currently unimproved property for use
as parking and staging area. Also, the applicant would like - to add
approximately 3500 square feet to the existing loading dock area. The
building addition would add 17 bays to the existing 34 currently available
at the facility.
Staff has had a meeting with the City Engineer to conduct a preliminary
review of the project and its storm water runoff impacts. According to the
Engineer, the plan, as submitted, provides for adequate storm water control
and discharge from the site. In addition, Staff has referred the applicant
to Kate Drewry at the Rice Creek Watershed District to discuss possible
permitting requirements at that Agency. Staff is still awaiting word from
RCWD on the project.
The Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed this item and recommended
approval in Resolution No. 401-94 . Please note that the Planning
Commission approval is contingent upon RCWD approval of the project. Staff
has prepared the attached Resolution for consideration by the City Council.
I have prepared an area map for reference purposes. • Staff will be bringing
the set of plans received for the project to the Meeting. If you have any
questions...po the meeting, please do not hesitate to give me a call.
` !
Paul Harrington, Community eve opment Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolution No. 4640 approving the Development Review for the Crouse
Cartage Company, 2169 Mustang Drive.
•
•
•
r.11.4 IV15x','1...•41 .53T4 No
✓,_�."•iJ,,� �2,MIK I rrr 'r
7 531 53t 33 6 531
�� 530+1 531 '• 5306 331
��4 . 532 I _ 7301 S .• 52'• 53.. 52��.
29 5295 r n 7. T1,1 a 5294 529 5794 ntig 529•
:4 u `26 P. n P. r n .n•. n• ^ P., _ n• ti 5 .. 526 5166 576 •.,
CO nD nZ
L:
,1.? -. - 5275 5267
rk . yS� 5263
5251 It
79 5
•
elp
• 52• MP.:� :::
7
10
MI ,, ,.. 1J!
�� 524C p.,A, 520/3 524152+41 524•^ ��}... • 523 ..32301373• err.•�y� 523•
•801'729.^��^ ETE 322• ,4.„
52.1 521 a 52101 521 521•
rAt.`.2^01`20• 52004520• 5200152•' 13= ( .....I
2,1'2:
,Z.I:,14 f::11 .* T
L;' - �.
____. : j
RMLtI 1.:.‘ 4.110. • la
SC1w" • Z .
1�
51C: 1
7.: I s. ... r. ig
. . ,
Ln
Q
4.111111.66
TOWNS axe TERRACE
1 MOOR E MOPE PARK -
y 1
b25�,
11 111.g
•E21
. % 20 a
01
NI
•159
u ♦151
4749
::3
RESOLUTION NO. 4640
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST
OF THE CROUSE CARTAGE COMPANY, 2169 MUSTANG DRIVE
WHEREAS, the Crouse Cartage Company has requested City
approval to construct an approximately 3500 square foot, 17 bay
building addition and surface approximately 90, 000 square feet
for parking purposes at their facility at 2169 Mustang Drive; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code
requires that a development review be conducted for this and
similar proposals; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the
following documents regarding this development proposal:
1. Planning Application dated September 21, 1994
2 . Topographic Survey dated August 23 , 1994 and
amended September 20, 1994
3 . Building Plans dated August 24 , 1994; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the
proposal is in conformance with all applicable requirements of
. the Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has
reviewed this request and recommended approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
City Council approves the development review request subject to
the following condition:
1. The proposal meets all applicable requirements of
the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) for storm
water runoff control.
Adopted this 26th day of September, 1994 .
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk-Administrator
777:7 tiN REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONS.WER�TION Report Numer. —1 iu9c
1
5REPORT c'�epar Data: 9-2z-94
.��,? ,��� Agenda Sec"on:, 11.C
Gourd Action:
C Special Order of Busines.
CITY COUNCIL IV F,TING DATE September 26, 1994 ?• iic Hearings
C Consent Agenda
t Council Business
Item Desc:ipsion:
Consideration of Adoption of Ordinance No. 548 "Land Subdivisions"
Adminisrrator's Ravi ewiRecammendarion:
- No comments to supplement this repo
- Comments attached.
ExplanationiSummarj (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
At the September 12 , 1994 City Council meeting, Ordinance No. 548 was
formally introduced by the Council. The Ordinance is presented again for
consideration of formal adoption.
The Ordinance would amend the Subdivision Regulations to require that all
contiguously owned property be included in Plat applications.
`
Z/!:---
' Paul --arrington, Communit Development Coordinator
•
•
RECOMMENDATION:
Waive the reading and formally adopt Ordinance No. 548 amending Title 1200,
"Land Subdivisions" , of the Mounds View City Code.
•
ORDINANCE NO. 548
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE,
REQUIRING ALL CONTIGUOUSLY OWNED UNPLATTED PROPERTY TO BE
INCLUDED IN ALL SUBDIVISIONS, ADDING A DEFINITION OF OUTLOT AND
AMENDING TITLE 1100, CHAPTER 1102, SECTION 1102.02 AND TITLE 1200,
CHAPTER 1202, SECTION 1202.02, SUBDIVISION 2 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW
CITY CODE
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. Findings. The City Council finds that it is in the best interest of
the public to require subdividers and owners of property to include all contiguously
owned property when submitting a plat application for property that is previously
unplatted. This requirement is necessary in order for the City to properly plan for
the orderly development of property within its boundaries and to ensure that
subdividers consider the effect that present development has on potential future
development of adjoining properties.
SECTION II. Section 1202.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View City Code is
amended by adding the following paragraph:
c. The application must include all contiguous land
owned by the subdivider or owner, unless the
application is a replat of property that has been
previously platted. If only a portion of the
property to be subdivided is planned to be
presently developed, the remainder of the land may
be platted as an outlot. The subdivider or owner
must submit a schematic demonstrating how the
property that is not currently planned for
development could be developed consistent with the
City's regulations.
SECTION III. The introductory clause to Section 1102.02 of the Mounds
View City Code is amended to read as follows:
DEFINITIONS: The following words and terms,
wherever they occur in this Titic Code, shall be
defined as follows:
SECTION IV. Section 1102.02 of the Mounds View City Code is amended
by adding a new subdivision to read:
Subd. 81a. OUTLOT. A parcel of land included in a
plat or subdivision which is: (1) smaller than the
minimum lot size and therefore unbuildable until
combined through platting or subdivision with
additional land; (2) not presently proposed for
development and therefore subject to future
platting or subdivision prior to development; or
(3) designated for public or private open space,
right-of-way, utilities or other similar purpose.
SECTION V. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its
publication.
Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of
_ , 1994. —
Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day
of , 1994.
ATTEST:
•
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk-Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Agenda Section: 11.D
v _NLS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATIONReport Number: 94-1311C
Report Date: 9-22-94
STAFF REPORT
Council Action:
❑ Special Order of Business
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE S Pp r emh P r 76, 19 94 ❑ Public Hearings
0 Consent Agenda
I Council Business
Item Description: Consideration of Preliminary Plat, Sherwood Estates
Administrator's Review/Recommendatio •
- No comments to supplement this re,
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement . . :s necessary.)
SUMMARY;
In July of this year, Ken Sjodin, representing Citywide Developers, made
application to the City Council for a Major Subdivision of the property
indicated on the attached map. The proposal called for 17 single family
lots to be located northeast of the Spring Lake Road/Highway 10
intersection. The proposed development would be partially serviced by a
cul-de-sac to be constructed at the expense of the applicant. Staff
reviewed the proposal and found that it met the general intent of the
Municipal Code. One item did need to be addressed: The possible need for
storm water control ponding to service the development.
• Following the July Council meeting, Staff met with the City Consulting
Engineer and the applicant to discuss the storm water issue and its
relationship to the overall storm water management needs of the entire area
surrounding the proposed Plat. It is the initial opinion of the Engineer
that a sufficient ponding plan can be established to handle the anticipated
runoff. The Engineer also informed the applicant that the Rice Creek
Watershed District needed to be contacted regarding a wetland within the
development which is on the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) . Also, a RCWD
permit would be required for approval of the project (Note: Action by RCWD
on this project is tentatively scheduled for September 28) .
Since that meeting, the applicant has delineated the referenced wetland to
the satisfaction of RCWD (please see attached letter) and has resubmitted
the Plat for consideration by the City Council.
The applicant is requesting that the Council consider taking action on the
Preliminary Plat at the upcoming meeting (September 26) . The project would
then be more fully reviewed at the October 3, 1994 Work Session at which
time the Consulting Engineer can be present to discuss the storm water
management-i"ssgs.
Paul Harrington, Communevelopment Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION;
Adopt Resolution No. 4639 approving the Preliminary Plat of Sherwood
Estates for Citywide Developers, Planning Case No. 387-94 .
STAFF REPORT
SEPTEMBER 26, 1994
PAGE TWO
Approving the Preliminary Plat at the upcoming meeting would in no
way grant the applicant any right in developing the project but,
rather, would allow for a savings of two weeks on the time needed
to review and act on the proposal. If all issues can be resolved
at the October Work Session, the Plat could be put on the October
10 Agenda for consideration of final approval.
�.�o0 8387 8380 Dani csvu• 8391 8388 837 ���837: o'iy 83 8373 8370 ;
8380 8385 �_ 8387 8382 8381 8378 3 n n 8365 83728360
Y 8370 5 8371 8368 8374 8383 8372 8371 8368 8369 CO 8360 8355 8368 8350
8371 836= 8354
8351 I 834 8365 8345 8364 8345 8340
(1/ 8360 8360 W 8359
U— 8347 8360 8344. 8351 18346 8335 80 8331 8330
•
8350 8355 8340 835; 8341 8343 8342 8315 8320
8340 8334 O
8334 8325 8312
8330 8345 8336 8335 8330 64 8333
8335 8325 8335 8339 8332r 8315 8300 8303 8310 Cat
3 8330 8333 8305 8290 8495 8290
n 8320 8325 8316 8315 8322 Z 8321 8300 8285 8280 8287 8280
L L_ 8310 8315 8311 8308 X 8311
8275 8270 c 8281 8270tH
8300 8305 8312 8297 8298 8301 GROVELAND a 8265 8260 ct 8273 8260
8289 8285 PARK F.
8284 8285 8290 8255 8250
8267 8250
8281 8250 8261 w N. 8261 _ 8240
8280 8275 n I� 8240
827• 30 8241 m 1330C N a s c
8270 8265 N ARDAN N N N N 8230 8255 n
mmum
8260 825 8248 o o N O •• u_, AVE
Z rn rn rn rn :• o •. n cpi o 8 rso*.: s 8220
y 8250 a 45 — N N N N N N ' 1824' co a0 •" ao • n n n n
/ N N N N N N N N N 8211
8240 •LE 8233 822 8245 • 06 8210
823 8227
82 z 8213 I 82` o ,no v v 320(
8207 8210 8217 8,� 8205 N N N N
8191 8192 - 8203 DR
MP- 8177 8200 N N 8208 m N 00 NO 1 8175
8177
812.3,--880 8175 8160 C°4 cgi�0 8200 n N N NN 814E 8165 ��?
811• 816• / 8148 . • S� G
81178145
S
003 815.815E 8138 8142 8135 , •
p0 1. d s
8132 E,7 � � A
L> n • .c..„ n rn 0 n rntr,
rn o o n a v M
IX
�, I HCl _ 0 00 n_n n n n g !.Ifl
Q OF
ArAllor
• N N N N N N N N N n'
Za (V N O • co O 8 —
rn M 606• N N N ao t, a N Ct 8080 806 7 N N 8088
—
N N 8060 8065 I 8084 8085 8070 Q 8071 8066
N 804• 8075 8060 8059 8050
> Q 80 • 8045 8046 8045 8040 8042
t l_ Q o 8036 8039 8032
N 8020 8025 8026 8025 8028
(1 8016 8075 8025 8018 _
LL_ 7980 8005 8000:8005 8016 8009 8006
Z - -
7990 s 7985 8004 7981 7990 Q
_~
V / A, 7980 7975 7970 y 7979 7980
YO 7960 7965 7960 0 7959 7970 _
m 7950 7955 7956ctL1 7949 7954
N co
7933 7940
N a 7934 7950 7930
7932
J uni a
r 7920 0 N N N 17900 7901 7900
IttLLVIEW . RD
1 7897 7918 co
N N HILLVIEW -
el
o
n°4
7830 7835 7890 7887 7867 co co
M 7820 Y 7825 7880 7879 7880, co
11lir 7876 Z
781. 7815 7870 7865 0 7860 7835 N co o Z
/80• 7805 7860 7851 0 7850 7821 N O 7870
O
o•
t9 _ 4*
ro
co iJj !,, 8;c 7801 '1; 7791 Lia
783 7821 rn apo 7786 7781 7750/ ^o
7768 7769 7780 ®��
7775 7758 7759 7770 *7-vc)t‘
7748 7749 7768 7767
7738 7739, 7729
. Y
78017755 77277728 7723 827730
.y.- gSrn Lake
771864 7719 7718 7715 772Q
o 7710rnN 7710 7709 7710 7711 N 7700
0
CO M
co tssz •::.:RO •'•'
7686 7685 N 7692 I--7885
7690
Q p
Q 7675 N 7680 p 7669 7670 7663 7682 X
7680
M N iO O 64 7670 7665 7660 3 I
0 O 0 0 766(MM N' M M7655 ( 7666 7647 7644 7653 o Q
7630
7633 1 7664 7629 7634 7635
CONFIRMS FAX SENT 9-13-94 '" . s-
:
-. .=•••----. .. .ter_. '..
tl(e:" :_ eft ;',',':'.:7i...2.1 " '-i''"t-+`
Rice Creek watershed d%strict��� ��:,:
3585 LEXINGTON AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 132 _ _••, _
ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 35126-8016 ._ ',_:77--i.,.•
-
TELEPHONE (612) 483-0634
September 12 , 1994 FAX (612) 483-9186 . ` — _ _
---:i
I '.a>t: :agl ~3sZw ...
••::,: .00.--- Board of Managers
: Regular Meetings:
ti � - - g
Ross Redman PE 4 2nd and 4th Wednesdays
at Shoreview City Hall
Comstock & Davis Inc.
1446 County Road J KATE DREWRY, District Admin.
BONITA TORPE, Admin. Assist.
Minneapolis MN 55432
RE: Sherwood Estates, intersection of Hwy 10 and Spring Lake Road,
City of Mounds View
Dear Mr. Redman: •
With reference to your faxed memo of September 12, 1994, I 'm
writing to confirm that I 'm in agreement with your determination
that the above-referenced site does not include any ,jurisdictional
. wetland.
An RCWD permit is still required for this project. A completed
- application form, along with a stormwater management and grading
plan, and preliminary plat should be submitted in triplicate to the
District Office by September 15, 1994, for consideration at the
September 28 , 1994, meeting of the Board.
1
Sincere ,/
Al
,.1.
6L ki-11:!".4(-4-”,
Kate Drewry //
District Administrator
bct
Enclosures
cc: City of Mounds View
Correspondence Log
BOARD OF MANAGERS
A. J. CARDINAL, SR. CAROLE V. RYDEN ROGER L. OBERG BARBARA A. HAAKE EUGENE L. PETERSON
ANOKA COUNTY RAMSEY COUNTY WASHINGTON COUNTY RAMSEY COUNTY ANOKA COUNTY
MONTGOMERY WATSON Consulting Engineers 473.4224 •MICHELLE I.ULRICH Attorney 699.9845
RESOLUTION NO. 4639
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING SHERWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT,
CITYWIDE DEVELOPERS, PLANNING CASE NO. 387-94
WHEREAS, Citywide Developers have requested approval of
a Preliminary Plat for the property legally described and attached
as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the plat is shown as Sherwood Estates and dated
July 29, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the
applicant's request for a Plat that includes 17 lots and one (1)
outlot and found that it is in conformance with all applicable
sections of the Mounds View Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has
reviewed the Plat and recommended approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City
Council approves the Preliminary Plat of Sherwood Estates for
Citywide Developers contingent upon the following:
1) Outlot A, as shown on the proposed Plat, shall be
deeded to the City until such time that the property to the
immediate South of the Outlot is developed.
2) Storm water ponding on the proposed Plat shall be
provided per direction of the City Consulting Engineer.
Adopted this 26th day of September, 1994.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
City Administrator
11.E
FOR UE
RE ST COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section:
��"�,r;,� QReport Number: 94-1311C
STAFF REPORT Report Date: 9-22-94
,r 7? Council Action:
❑ Special Order of Business
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE September 26. 1994 ❑ Public Hearings
❑ Consent Agenda
/0 Council Business
Item Description: Consideration of Resolution No. 4637 Creating a Recycling Intern Position
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report �-�i i
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY:
When the City's Code Enforcement Officer/Recycling Coordinator departed in
April of this year, the Council responded to the needs of the community by
creating a Planning Associate position that would do full-time code
enforcement.
The other duties and responsibilities of that position, recycling, have not
been performed since this reassignment. In order to resume these duties
and responsibilities, it is proposed an intern be hired. This would be a
part-time position, up to` 19 hours per week, with no benefits.
The proposed 5 Step pay plan for this position would be:
STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5
$8/hr. $8.50/hr. $9/hr. $9.50/hr. $10/hr.
Funding for this position for the remainder of this year would come from
the 1994 recycling budget that was funded by a Ramsey County SCORE grant.
For 1995, the City expects to again receive SCORE funding from the County
which would be used for recycling programs and personnel costs.
If the Council approves this position, it is proposed that an advertisement
be placed in Sunday's (10/2/94) paper. A draft of a job description and
job advertisement are attached for your review.
Tim Cruikshank, Asst. To City Admin.
RECOMMENDATION;
Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 4637 creating the position
of part-time Recycling Intern, funding to come from Ramsey County SCORE
Grant budgeted in 100-4180.
RESOLUTION NO. 4637
.CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CREATION OF PART-TIME RECYCLING
COORDINATOR POSITION
WHEREAS, when the City's Code Enforcement Officer/Recycling
Coordinator departed in April of this year, the Council responded
to the needs of the community by creating a Planning Associate
position that would do full-time code enforcement; and
WHEREAS, the other duties and responsibilities of that position,
recycling, have not been performed since this reassignment; and
WHEREAS, in order to resume these duties and responsibilities, it
is proposed an intern be hired; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the position of Recycling
Intern be created, funding to come from 1994 Community Development
budget 100-4180 and in 1995 SCORE funding to be received from
Ramsey County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED this would be a part-time position, up to 19
hours per week, with no benefits.
Presented this 26th day of September, 1994.
(ATTEST)
Jerry Linke, Mayor
(SEAL)
Samantha Orduno, City Administrator
DRAFT
POSITION DESCRIPTION
Class Title: Recycling Coordinator
GENERAL PURPOSE
Performs routine and complex and administrative, technical and
professional work in coordinating the solid waste recycling
programs of the City.
SUPERVISION RECEIVED:
Works under the general guidance and direction of Community
Development Coordinator.
SUPERVISION EXERCISED
None.
ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Coordinates recycling programs and services of the City.
Monitors recycling contracts with recyclers and solid waste
handlers.
Monitors municipal waste stream; develops, maintains and reports a
variety of data relating to the waste stream and diversion to
recycling programs.
Assists with development of operating or capital budgets.
Develops programs to promote and educate the public about recycling
and other related resource conservation issues; prepares brochures,
flyers, reports, flip charts, posters, calendars, articles,
displays, exhibits and other educational and promotional items.
Researches information, prepares presentations, and makes
presentations to various educational, civic, business, government
and service groups.
Coordinates special recycling activities, such as workshops,
demonstrations, christmas tree collection, or seasonal cleanups.
Provides technical support to other departments and the general
public on recycling and related solid waste issues.
Develops, coordinates, promotes, and administers funding/grant
programs to support specialized activities.
Monitors Federal, state and local legislation dealing with
recycling and related resource conservation issues. Represents City
interests on committees and at public meetings and hearings.
DRAFT
Prepares local ordinances, policies and procedures for municipal
recycling and related resource conservation programs.
PERIPHERAL DUTIES
Assists Community Development Coordinator as assigned.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
Education and Experience:
(A) Graduation from a four-year college or university with a
degree in environmental science, public administration or a closely
related field; and
(B) Experience using Wordperfect, Lotus 123, Pagemaker and
DBase software; and
(C) Any equivalent combination of education and experience.
Necessary Knowledge, Skills and Abilities:
(A) Knowledge of solid waste, recycling, and resource
conservation principles, practices, methods and trends;
Considerable knowledge of applicable Federal, state, county and
city policies, laws, and regulations affecting recycling
activities;
(B) Skill in operating the listed tools and equipment.
(C) Ability to communicate effectively, orally and in writing,
with employees, consultants, other governmental agency
representatives, City officials and the general public; Ability to
conduct necessary -research and compile comprehensive reports;
Ability to prepare and administer a variety of recycling programs.
DESIRED QUALIFICATIONS
(A) Working toward or have graduate degree in environmental
science, public administration or a closely related field;
(B) Minimum of one year experience related to recycling or
solid waste programs.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
Must possess a valid State driver's license or have the ability to
obtain one prior to employment.
TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT USED
Personal computer, including word processing, desk top publishing,
spreadsheet, and data base; motor vehicle; phone; fax and copy
machine, calculator.
PHYSICAL DEMANDS
The physical demands described here are representative of those
that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the
DRAFT
essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be
made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the
essential functions.
Work is performed mostly in office settings. Some outdoor work is
required in the inspection of recycling systems. Hand-eye
coordination is necessary to operate computers and various pieces
of office equipment.
While performing the duties of this job, the employee is
occasionally required to stand; walk; use hands to finger, handle,
feel or operate objects, tools, or controls; and reach with hands
and arms. The employee is occasionally required to sit;
talk or hear; and smell.
The employee must occasionally lift and/or move up to 25 pounds.
Specific vision abilities required by this job include close
vision, distance vision, color vision, depth perception, and the
ability to adjust focus.
WORK ENVIRONMENT
The work environment characteristics described here are
representative of those an employee encounters while performing the
essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be
made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the
essential functions.
While performing the duties of this job, the employee occasionally
works in outside weather conditions.
The noise level in the work environment is usually quiet to
moderate.
SELECTION GUIDELINES
Formal application, rating of education and experience; oral
interview and reference check; job related tests may be required.
The duties listed above are intended only as illustrations of the
various types of work that may be performed. The omission of
specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the
position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to
the position.
The job description does not constitute an employment agreement
between the employer and employee and is subject to change by the
employer as the needs of the employer and requirements of the job
change.
Approval: Approval:
Supervisor Appointing Authority
Effective Date: Revision History:
DRAFT
RECYCLING INTERN
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
Temporary, PT position (up to 19 hrs/wk) responsible for all aspects of
City's recycling program including routine and complex and
administrative, technical and professional work. Must have bachelors
degree in planning or related field; 1 yr municipal related exp; must
possess state drivers license. Desire masters degree and Wordperfect
and Dbase exp. $8.00 - $10.00/hr. DOQ. Call 784-3055 for application
and job description. Application and resume to: Personnel, Mounds View
City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112, by 5:30 p.m.,
Monday, October 10, 1994. AA/EOE.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSMERA.TION Agenda c=OII= 11.F
sSrw'-.yr•s.
19
Repo=.Nnr--^er.94-1321C
ST REPORT Repos Date: 9-22-94
: .% Courci:kwon:
C Spec:ai Order of B urines
CITY COUNCIL MEETrNG DATE September 26, 1994 0 ?,�iic Fearings
0 Consent Agenda
t Council Business
Item Description: Consideration of Resolution No. 4641 Requesting Ramsey County to
Pursue the Feasibility of a School Speed Zone on County Road I
Admiristrator'3 Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this repot 120(1;144
- Corn.manta attached.
ExpianationiSummarj (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
i TTnvr A jtY:
In response to a request to -make County Road I safer for school children, •
Resolution No. 4641 is presented for your consideration.
This Resolution proposes that Ramsey County pursue the feasibility of
installing signage that would reduce the speed limit in this area, add
signage to warn motorists they are in a school zone and also change County
Road I from a 4 lane highway to a 2 lane street with a center turn lane.
The City would like Ramsey County to implement these requests to create a
safe school zone for children who attend Pinewood School and will . work
,cooperatively with the County to achieve these goals.
•
•
•
/,/ ;\1
. Tim Cruikshank, Asst. To City Admin. .
•
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 4641 requesting Ramsey
County pursue the feasibility of creating a safe school zone on County Road
I.
RESOLUTION NO. 4641
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION REQUESTING RAMSEY COUNTY PURSUE THE FEASIBILITY OF
CREATING A SCHOOL SPEED ZONE ON COUNTY ROAD I NORTH OF
PINEWOOD SCHOOL
WHEREAS, the current rate of speed and lack of proper signage on County Road I is
posing a safety hazard for the children who attend Pinewood School; and
WHEREAS,it is requested that Ramsey County install signage which would reduce the
speed limit and warn motorists they are in a school zone; and
WHEREAS, changing County Road I from a 4 lane highway to a 2 lane street with a
center turn lane would contribute to a safer school zone as well; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View will work cooperatively with Ramsey County to
help achieve these goals.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Mound View City Council urges Ramsey
County to implement these requests to create a safe school speed zone on County
Road I North of Pinewood School.
Presented this 26th day of September, 1994.
(ATTEST)
Jerry Linke, Mayor
(SEAL)
Samantha Orduno, City Administrator
•
DISTRIBUTED AT SEPTEMBER 26, 1994 MEETING
RE QUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION AgendaeortNumber:
Section:
Report Numbe
STAFF REPORT Report Date: 9/26/94
Council Action:
• ❑ Special Order of Business
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE September 26, 1994 0 Public Hearings
❑ Consent Agenda
❑ Council Business
Item Description: PAYMENT TO MIDWEST ASPHALT FOR THE PATCHING CONTRACT
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
Comments attached. •
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY:
Staff is requesting authorization from City Council to pay Midwest Asphalt for Maintenance Project 94-
1 (Patching), in the amount of$46,059. This amount is over the bidded price because of the extra work
needed on some of the streets. The bid tab requested unit prices for adjustment of manholes and gate
valves. Depending on the condition and grade of the street some adjustment of these structures are
necessary. The contractor was required to raise 11 manholes and water valves. A few segments of roads
required removing the entire street. These areas were found to have numerous potholes, inadequate base
material, and severe alligator cracking. The combination of these conditions warranted complete
removal. Patching of the following streets was not feasible, nor cost efficient. Staff followed the same
procedure last year on Adams Street, north of Bronson.
Red Oak Drive from County Road H2 to Longview Drive
Knollwood Drive, North of Ardan Avenue, approximately 270 feet
Longview Drive to Woodcrest Drive, approximately 270 feet •
Since this amount is over 10% of the awarded contract, the Public Works Director cannot authorize this
change order. In accordance with the approval of the bid, Council must approve this amount. All other -
segments of the contract remain within the approved amount. Attached is invoice and the bid tab for
the contract.
i
/1/.,((/
1/ ( itt/`` L
ichael Ulrich, Directoor of Public Works
RIWAiMMLr{ L1W>IJOitly Midwest Asphalt in the amount of $81,001.80 for the Patching Contract,
Maintenance Project 94-1, $68,622.00 to be funded from the Streets Dept. budget, account# 100-4270-
704 and the remaining $12,379.80 to be funded from the Water Dept. Fund, account # 680-4120-703.
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: SAMANTHA ORDUNO, CITY ADMINISTRAT• '
DATE: SEPTEMBER 22, 1994
RE: INDEX FOR WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 26, 1994
MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 26, 1994
. Council Meeting, Monday, September 26, 1994, 7:00 p.m.
ITEMS PROVIDED IN THIS WEEK'S COUNCIL PACKET
. This Is It!
. Agenda
. Unapproved Minutes, September 12, 1994
. Approved Minutes, August 29, 1994
******************
ADMINISTRATOR'S SCHEDULE
(Please note that this schedule is subject to change
as meetings are scheduled, rescheduled or canceled.
At any time Audrey, Michele, or Tim C. will have my
most current schedule and a number where I can be
reached at all times. )
Monday, September 26, 1994
7:00 p.m. Council Meeting
Tuesday, September 27, 1994
12:00 Luncheon Meeting - Rotary (Guest of Charlie Hall)
4:20 p.m. Dental Appointment
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PAGE TWO
SEPTEMBER 22, 1994
Wednesday, September 28, 1994
11 :30 Luncheon Meeting
2:30 p.m. Customer Service Meeting - Georgine Madsen
5:30 p.m. Woodlawn Terrace Management Meeting
Thursday, September 29, 1994
2:00 p.m. Meeting with Charlie Hall
Friday, September 30, 1994
7:30 a.m. Dental
11 :30 Strategic Planning Consultant Meeting
UNAPPROVED
1 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
2 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
3 RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
4
5 Regular Meeting
6 September 12, 1994
7 Mounds View City Hall
8 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
9
10
11
12 CALL TO ORDER
13
14 The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor Linke at 7: 00
15 p.m. on Monday, September 12, 1994 .
16
17
18 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
19
20
21 ROLL CALL
22
23
24 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Linke, Councilmembers Wuori, Blanchard,
25 Quick and Trude
26
27 MEMBERS ABSENT: None
28
29 ALSO PRESENT: Samantha Orduno, City Administrator; Paul Harrington,
30 Community Development Coordinator; Mike Ulrich, Director of Public Works;
31 Mary Saarion, Director of Parks, Recreation and Forestry
32
33 ADDITIONS TO AGENDA:
34
35 a. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, asked that Resolution No.
36 4634 Intent to Dismiss be placed on the agenda. This item was made
37 11. I.
38
39 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
40
41 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Wuori to Approve Minutes from August 29, 1994
42
43 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
44
45 ACCEPTANCE OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES:
46
47 Planning Commission Minutes, Regular Meeting, August 3 , 1994
48
49 MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Quick to Accept Planning Commission Minutes
50 of August 3 , 1994
51
52 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
UNAPPROVED
1
2 Mounds View City Council Page Two
3 Regular Meeting September 12, 1994
4
5
6 SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS
7
8 a. Mayor Linke read Resolution No. 4632 Commending David Rife for the
9 Completion of the Golf Course Clean Up Day
10
11 MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Quick to Adopt Resolution No. 4632 Commending
12 David Rife for the Completion of the Golf Course Clean Up Day
13
14 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
15
16 Mayor Linke, on behalf of the City Council, presented Resolution No.
17 4632 to David Rife and commending him for a job well done.
18
19 b. Mayor Linke read Resolution No. 4627 Commending Justin Bjur for the
20 Completion of the Landscaping Project at City Hall Soccer Field
21
22 MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Blanchard to Adopt Resolution 4627 Commending
23 Justin Bjur for the Completion of the Landscaping Project at City
24 Hall Soccer Field
25
26 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
27
28 Mayor Linke, on behalf of the City Council, presented Resolution No.
29 4627 to Justin Bjur and commended him for the excellent work done on
30 the project.
31
32 c. Mayor Linke Read Resolution No. 4631 Commending Jeff Weinke for His
33 Excellent Service in Working with the AAU Baseball Tournament
34
35 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to Adopt Resolution No. 4631
36 Commending Jeff Weinke for His Excellent Service in Working with the
37 AAU Baseball Tournament
38
39 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
40
41 Mayor Linke, on behalf of the City and the City Council, presented
42 Resolution No. 4631 and commended him for the excellent work he does
43 in going the "extra mile" for the City.
44
45 d. Mayor Linke read Resolution No. 4633 Commending Marvin Johnson, Jr.
46 for His Excellence in Facilitating Athletic Space for Groups and
47 Organizations
48
49 MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Blanchard to Adopt Resolution No. 4633
50 Commending Marvin Johnson, Jr. for His Excellence in Facilitating
51 Athletic Space for Groups and Organizations
52
53 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
54
tif$A131311 (:)))11)
1 Mounds View City Council Page Three
2 Regular Meeting September 12, 1994
3
4
5 Mayor Linke commended Marvin Johnson, Jr. for the excellent job
6 he does in scheduling space for athletic groups and organizations.
7 Mary Saarion, Director of Parks, Recreation and Forestry, accepted
8 Resolution No. 4633 on Marv's behalf as he was working conducting
9 a football meeting.
10
11 e. Mayor Linke read the Proclamation Declaring September 25-October 2,
12 1994 as Cities Week in Mounds View and proclaimed the same.
13
14 CONSENT AGENDA
15
16 Samantha Orduno read the Consent Agenda.
17
18 Mayor Linke asked if there were any items the Council desired removed
19 from the Consent Agenda. There were no items removed.
20
21 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to Adopt the Consent Agenda As Presented
22
23 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
24
25 RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR
26
27 There were no resident requests or comments during this meeting.
28
29 PUBLIC HEARINGS:
30
31 There were no public hearings scheduled for this meeting.
32
33 COUNCIL BUSINESS:
34
35 There were no Consent Agenda items brought forward.
36
37 A. Remove Ordinance No. 547, Long Term Financial Plan for the Table
38
39 MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Trude to Remove Ordinance no. 547, Long
40 Term Financial Plan from the Table
41
42 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
43
44 Consideration of Adoption of Ordinance No. 547 Long Term Financial
45 Plan
46
47 Don Brager, Finance Director, reported that Ordinance No.
48 547 (LTFP) was introduced at the August 8, 1994 and August 29, 1994
49 Council meetings. This ordinance is scheduled for adoption at this
50 meeting. Brager stated that the budget may be in variance with
51 items in the Long Term Financial Plan. Brager summarized the work
52 that took place to formulate the Long Term Financial Plan.
53
54
UNAPPROVED
1 Mounds View City Council Page Four
2 Regular Meeting September 12, 1994
3
4
5
6 MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Trude to Adopt Ordinance No. 547, Long Term
7 Financial Plan
8
9 ROLL CALL VOTE:
10 Mayor Linke - yes
11 Councilmember Quick - yes
12 Councilmember Wuori - yes
13 Councilmember Trude - yes
14 Councilmember Blanchard - yes
15
16 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
17
18 B. Consideration of Introduction of Ordinance No. 548 Amending Title
19 1200, "Land Subdivisions" , of the Mounds View Municipal Code
20
21 Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reported that following the
22 review of the proposed amendments to the Subdivision Regulations at
23 the September 7, 1994, City Council Work Session, staff has prepared
24 the Ordinance No. 548 for consideration of the Council. This
25 ordinance would amend the subdivision regulations to require that
26 all contiguously owned property be included in plat applications.
27 Orduno stated that this is a housekeeping item recommended by the
28 City's County Attorney and puts the City into compliance with what
29 is common practice in other cities.
30
31 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to Approve Introduction of Ordinance No.
32 548 Amending Title 1200, "Land Subdivisions", of the Mounds View
33 Municipal Code
34
35 Councilmember Trude stated that this is an appropriate motion
36 as now all the land in the business park will be platted.
37
38 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
39
40 C. Consideration of Resolution No. 4626, "A Resolution Certifying the
41 1995 Proposed Operating Budget, 1995 Proposed Property Tax Levies
42 and Setting the Date for a Public Hearing on the Same
43
44 Don Brager, Finance Director-Treasurer, summarized the proposed 1995
45 budget and noted the estimated effect upon the average homeowner in
46 the City's share of the property tax levy. Brager presented
47 Resolution No. 4626 Certifying the 1995 Proposed Operating Budget,
48 1995. Proposed Property Tax Levies and Setting the Date for a Public
49 Hearing on the Same Pursuant to Truth In Taxation Legislation for
50 Council consideration. The date for the hearing would be 7: 00 p.m.
51 on November 30, 1994 and should it be necessary to adjourn the
52 public hearing and continue it at a later date, the reconvened
53 hearing will be held at 7: 00 p.m. on December 7, 1994 .
54
t if 4 R
iVED
1 Mounds View City Council Page Five
2 Regular Meeting September 12, 1994
3
4
5 MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Blanchard to Adopt Resolution No. 4626
6 Certifying the 1995 Proposed Operating Budget, 1995 Proposed
7 Property Tax Levies and Setting the Date for a Public Hearing on the
8 Same Pursuant to Truth In Taxation Legislation.
9
10 Mayor Linke stated that the City is providing the County with the
11 information they need to send out the Truth In Taxation Numbers. The
12 Council is not finished looking at the budget, but that this is the
13 maximum amount that could be levied. The County needs to set a
14 maximum, but when it comes to December the numbers will be different
15 that those presented at this meeting.
16
17 Councilmember Trude stated that 2% had to be set aside for potential
18 lawsuits in regards to the term limits issue.
19
20 Mayor Linke stated that the lawsuits are a possible use for the two
21 percent.
22
23 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
24
25 D. Consideration of Approval/Recommendation for the Park Building
26 Improvements
27
28 Mary Saarion, Director of Parks, Recreation and Forestry reported
29 that last year staff had prepared a grant application for the
30 installation of restrooms in three of the park buildings in the City
31 and submitted for a Community Development Block Grant through Ramsey
32 County. The City was awarded $25, 000 for the project. The project
33 was recently put to bid. Three bids were received, however, the low
34 bidder had not received the addendum and had not bidded with the
35 addendum. The next low bid was $38,469 which is higher than the
36 grant monies. The Park and Recreation Commission requested Mary to
37 go to the Council and ask the Council to approve Hillview and
38 Groveland Park improvements as bid with the additional monies coming
39 from the Park Dedication Fees received from the C. G. Hill project.
40 This would be enough money to accomplish the improvements on two
41 buildings.
42
43 Saarion further stated that in addition, in the 1995 budget, the
44 replacement of furnaces to both Hillview and Groveland Parks and it
45 would be wise to do all of the work at one time. Saarion asked if
46 the Council would consider a loan from the Recreation Activity Fund
47 to replace the Parks Capital Fund in 1995 as planned. The furnaces
48 in the buildings presently are very unreliable.
49
50 Saarion asked to the Council to accept CM Construction Company's
51 bid withdrawal; approve the bid by Callahan Construction for the
52 improvements and to authorize the loan from the Recreation Activity
53 Fund to replace the Parks Capital Fund in 1995.
54
UNAPPROVED
1 Mounds View City Council Page Six
2 Regular Meeting September 12, 1994
3
4
5 Councilmember Trude asked what the addendum was.
6
7 Saarion explained that it was the dewatering in Groveland Park.
8
9, Councilmember Trude asked if there were extra funds in the franchise
10 fee funds to supplement the grant.
11
12 Saarion reported that Brager and she had spoken and since it was
13 a park project it would be appropriate to use the Park Dedication
14 Funds.
15
16 Mayor Linke stated that the Council could look into the funding for
17 the other improvements. The Park Dedication Fees earmarked for
18 Woodcrest Park could possible be found from other funding sources.
19 Mayor Linke stated that he supports this project wholeheartedly as
20 this makes two more parks ADA accessible.
21
22 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Blanchard to Accept CM Construction's Bid
23 Withdrawal, Approve the Bid by Callahan Construction for the
24 Improvements and Authorize the Loan from the Recreation Activity
25 Fund to Replace the Parks Capital Fund in 1995
26
27 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
28
29 E. Consideration of Fixing the Form of the November 8, 1994 General
30 Election Ballot
31
32 Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reported that the Charter
33 Commission met on September 1 and submitted language on term limits
34 to her. The Council discussed this item at their Work Session on
35 September 7, however, prior to that the Council had asked the City
36 Attorney to review the language and address some questions that the
37 Council had as to the constitutionality of the issue. The City
38 Attorney put forth a legal opinion which was submitted to the
39 Council and referred to the Charter Commission with several
40 questions for clarification regarding the language. The Charter
41 Commission met this evening and submitted new language to the
42 Council just prior to this Council meeting.
43
44 Orduno stated that the action that needs to be taken prior to
45 September 15 by the Council is to set the form of the ballot.
46 Orduno presented the new language proposed by the Charter Commission
47 and stated that the City Attorney had reviewed the language, not
48 changed the language but worked on the form.
49
50 Jim Thomson, City Attorney, distributed the proposed language for
51 fixing the ballot properly for the November election. The form of
52 the ballot would be one question. Thomson read the proposed
53 language.
54
UNAP '
1 Mounds View City Council Page Seven
2 Regular Meeting September 12, 1994
3
4
5 Mayor Linke asked if this proposed language was worded correctly.
6
7 Richard Oman, member of the Charter Commission, asked if this
8 addressed the clarification questions that were raised.
9
10 Councilmember Trude pointed out one word that had been changed and
11 does not change the content of the language.
12
13 Mayor Linke stated that the proposed charter amendment is the only
14 part of revising of the Charter that will appear on the ballot. The
15 Charter Commission has determined that this goes directly to the
16 ballot. This proposed amendment states that once you have served on
17 the Council or in the Mayor's position for more than eight years, or
18 if you have been elected as fill in for a partial term, the person
19 could not file for a second term if a partial term and full term was
20 served. This keeps the person from filing for more than eight total
21 years but the person can be elected as part of a write-in ballot.
22 Mayor Linke states that this negates the persons right to file for
23 how many terms the resident wants them to serve.
24
25 Richard Oman stated that this issue came up in Charter Commission
26 proceedings over one year ago. The Charter is being updated and
27 this would be an amendment to the Charter and, therefore, it should
28 be up to the people and should go on the ballot. This change would
29 begin in January of 1995.
30
31 Councilmember Trude stated that 7 persons were in favor of placing
32 this on the ballot and 5 persons objected to the language and to
33 placing it on the ballot. The Attorney for the Charter Commission
34 stated that according to the State Constitution this is an illegal
35 act. The Holmes and Graven law firm who represent the Council,
36 which is a separate law firm than represents the Charter Commission,
37 think it is an illegal ordinance as written. Trude stated that she
38 believes it limits her constitutional right from voting for who she
39 would want to vote for. The City could be sued if the Council
40 would decide not to put this on the ballot. The Charter lets the
41 City do administrative details but does not allow the Council to
42 limit the terms of service as Mayor or City Councilmember.
43
44 Councilmember Trude stated that is why the 2% increase was put in
45 the budget for these type of lawsuits regarding the term limits.
46
47 Orduno reported that the Minneapolis Charter Commission recommended
48 to their Council to not place it on the ballot, their
49 Intergovernmental Relations Committee recommended to their Council
50 to not put in on their ballot and this afternoon their City Council
51 voted to not put in on the ballot.
52
53 Councilmember Blanchard asked if the City could supersede the State
54 and Federal Governments by limiting term limits. Blanchard
UNAPPROVED
1 Mounds View City Council Page Eight
2 Regular Meeting September 12, 1994
3
4
5 questioned whether it was legal or not and stated that she would
6 vote on it because of the potential lawsuits.
7
8 Richard Oman stated that cities within several states have term
9 limits. Oman stated that there are a lot of other cities in this
10 State dealing with this issue. Oman stated that undoubtedly there
11 will be a judgement by the Supreme Court regarding its legality.
12
13 Mayor Linke stated that our state constitution does not allow this
14 according to many lawyers he has spoken to.
15
16 Oman stated that there is no case law in this state regarding term
17 limits, therefore, its unconstitutionality has not been answered by
18 a Court of Law.
19
20 Councilmember Blanchard asked what liability does the Council have
21 if they choose to put something illegal on the ballot, if it is
22 illegal.
23
24 Jim Thomson, City Attorney, stated that the Council's duties are set
25 by the statute and one is to fix the form of the ballot and,
26 therefore, he does not see any individual liability.
27
28 Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, a member of the Charter
29 Commission and author of the motion before the Council in
30 conjunction and cooperation with the Chair of the Charter Commission
31 and members of the Charter Commission stated that he is concerned
32 that the City not become fear mongers in presenting their position.
33 McCarty stated it is not unconstitutional at this time. The
34 question of term limits has not been declared unconstitutional in
35 the State of Minnesota at this time. McCarty stated that it is
36 doubtful if Mound View will end up in a constitutional battle over
37 this question considering Minneapolis' decision on constitutionality
38 will be a equal application across the state in its final
39 determination. It will apply to Mounds View in the final decision
40 on that issue. McCarty presented the background of the direction
41 that the Charter Commission is coming from in presenting this issue.
42 People are asking from some relief from unresponsive government.
43 This issue belongs in the hands of the voters in Mounds View.
44
45 Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, stated that he has never seen so
46 much bad happen as it has happened in the last four years. The City
47 has spent $40, 000 of the taxpayer's money on surveys to find out
48 what the people in Mounds View want. Frits reminded the Council
49 that they are not to vote their mind, but to represent the people
50 and now there is a chance to let the people do the talking.
51
52 Councilmember Trude asked if it is a legal action for the Council to
53 put something illegal on the ballot.
54
UNAPPROVED
1 Mounds View City Council Page Nine
2 Regular Meeting September 12, 1994
3
4
5 Jim Thomson, City Attorney, stated that the question proposed to be
6 put on the ballot is not manifestly unconstitutional. Thomson
7 stated that it has to be determined manifestly unconstitutional to
8 not be put on the ballot.
9
10 Orduno stated the resolution received should be amended and said the
11 new language should be substituted for the old language regarding
12 the term limits.
13
14 Councilmember Trude stated the Council has no choice but to put this
15 to the voters.
16
17 Mayor Linke stated that when the Minneapolis issue goes to court it
18 might not be the constitutionality of the law.
19
20 Councilmember Wuori stated that the only thing she could say is that
21 the Council is placed in a hard position. The people of Mounds View
22 have exercised their rights in the past with the Council that has
23 been chosen. The Council has been backed by the residents most of
24 the time. The silent majority of the Charter Commission is not in
25 attendance tonight and Wuori stated, "shame on you" .
26
27
28 MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Trude to Fix the Form of the November 8,
29 1994 General Election Ballot as Presented As Amended
30
31 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
32
33 F. Consideration of Appointing Councilmember Diane Wuori and Frank
34 Blasiak to the TCAAP Reutilization Committee
35
36 Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, stated that Bruce Vento at a
37 recent meeting regarding the reutilization of the TCAAP property,
38 requested that each of the four cities abutting the site appoint an
39 official to serve on the proposed Reutilization Committee. Frank
40 Blasiak commented that he would bring forth updates from the
41 meetings he attends.
42
43 Councilmember Trude stated that these are public meetings and anyone
44 interested in serving on this committee should contact Mr. Vento's
45 office.
46
47 G. Consideration of Adoption of Community Vision and Mission Statement
48 Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator, reported that
49 in February and March of this year, as part of the Focus 2000
50 process, the Focus 2000 Steering Committee was asked to develop both
51 a Mission and Vision Statement for the community. Cruikshank also
52 reported as part of the Focus 2000 program, the City is embarking on
53 a comprehensive customer service program for all City employees to
54 participate in. The first session is scheduled for Wednesday,
UNAPPRH,� tY
1 Mounds View City Council Page Ten
2 Regular Meeting September 12, 1994
3
4 September 14 and it is the intention to have the employees "sign
5 off" on these statements in a symbolic effort to make a commitment
6 to the quality of service that is delivered to the community.
7
8 The Steering Committee made up of Brian Sjoberg from the Growth
9 Development and Business Issue Project Team, Stefan Benson and Bob
10 Easton from the Housing and Neighborhoods Issue Project Team and Dan
11 Nelson and Bill Wilson from the City Government Issue Project Team
12 drafted these statements.
13
14 MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Trude to Adopt the Community Vision and Mission
15 Statement
16
17 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
18
19 H. Consideration of Resolution No. 4629 Amending Resolution No. 4461
20 Which Adopted 1994 Mounds View Fee Schedule (12/13/94)
21
22 Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator, reported that
23 at the request of one of the proprietors affected by the on-sale
24 intoxicating liquor license fee, the Mounds View City Council, over
25 the past few months, has discussed several possible options to
26 renovate the fee structure. At the September Work Session the City
27 Council was presented with a new method of determining liquor
28 license fees that is more fair and equitable to affected
29 proprietors. Cruikshank went over the proposed formula for both on-
30 sale without cabaret and on-sale with cabaret.
31
32 Mayor Linke reported that he had called the gentleman who had
33 brought this to the City and he is very happy as this saves him
34 about $3700 per year for his small establishment.
35
36 Councilmember Trude stated that this was a cooperative effort
37 with the businesses.
38
39 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to Adopt Resolution No. 4629
40 Amending Resolution No. 4461 Which Adopted the 1994 Mounds View Fee
41 Schedule (12/13/94)
42
43 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
44
45 I. Consideration of Resolution No. 4634 Resolution of Intent to Dismiss
46
47 Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, stated that Council had
48 received in their packet Resolution No. 4634 . The portion of the
49 meeting where grounds for dismissal will be discussed must be
50 closed. The public cannot attend this meeting. The Mayor will have
51 to close the meeting and reopen the meeting at the point where the
52 Council would take any official action. The City Attorney is at the
53 meeting tonight to make sure every process and procedure is followed
54 to the letter.
UNAPPROVED
1 Mounds View City Council Page Eleven
2 Regular Meeting September 12, 1994
3
4
5
6 Jim Thomson, City Attorney, stated that the Open Meeting Law states
7 that the grounds for closing this meeting have to be stated. The
8 grounds for closing this meeting is Subd. lb, paragraph c. which
9 allows a public body to close a meeting to discuss preliminary
10 considerations of matters concerning an employee. Mayor Linke
11 closed the meeting. Mayor Linke indicated that the Council would
12 move to Conference Room A to discuss this matter.
13
14 Mayor Linke reopened the meeting at 9: 40.
15
16 MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Quick to Adopt Resolution No. 4634 Resolution
17 of Intent to Dismiss
18
19 REPORTS
20
21 1. Report of Councilmembers:
22
23 Councilmember Quick - No report.
24
25 Councilmember Blanchard reminded everyone to vote on
26 Tuesday.
27
28 Blanchard asked Mayor Linke to report on the shots
29 fired in the City. Linke stated that shots were not
30 fired at the patrolman.
31
32 Samantha Orduno stated that there was the potential
33 for one of our officers to be wounded or killed.
34 It doesn't just happen in St. Paul, it can happen
35 here. Our officers do put their life on the line.
36 Councilmember Blanchard is concerned that the people
37 know this.
38
39 Councilmember Blanchard stated that our officers did
40 not hesitate to go after these people after finding out
41 that there was a weapon involved.
42
43 Mayor Linke thanked New Brighton Police, Ramsey County
44 Sheriff Department, Minnesota State Highway Patrol for
45 coming to Mounds View's aid after hearing shots were
46 fired.
47
48 Councilmember Wuori: No report.
49
50 Councilmember Trude: Advised the public that there
51 were four openings on the Charter Commission and
52 gave some background on terms for Charter Commission
53 members.
54
M
D
1 Mounds View City Council Page Twelve
2 Regular Meeting September 12, 1994
3
4
5 Councilmember Trude presented her personal comments on
6 the term limit issue is that she is offended that some
7 people in the City want to make the 4 square mile City
8 of Mounds View a test case. Trude was frustrated that
9 the Council was put in this situation and that the City
10 will probably face some legal issues.
11
12 Report of Administrator:
13
14 Samantha Orduno reported that she will be attending International City
15 Managers Association conference in Chicago. Orduno stated that this is
16 the first conference that she won't have to speak at, she can enjoy it.
17
18 Report of Mayor Linke:
19
20 Councilmember Trude reminded everyone to vote.
21
22 Mayor Linke announced the time of the upcoming Council Work Session and
23 Council Meeting dates.
24
25 Councilmember Quick asked when the polls open.
26
27 Mayor Linke announced the polls open at 7: 00 a.m. and that employers
28 have to give people time off to vote.
29
30 ADJOURNMENT
31
32 There being no further business before this Council, Mayor Linke
33 adjourned the meeting at 10: 00 p.m.
34
35 Respectfully submitted,
36
37 Michele Severson
38 Recording Secretary
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49