Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packets - 1995/10/02
...........s s.....s.s s.s:s....,.....,:s::s.,::.......,.......,,:i.:....:...........:.......;.........,.,......i.s.,,.,.......s.....................,...s....:...,:::..,.,..:,...:..:.,:.,.:..::.,::.i.,:71111 Items Dispensed Per Consensus 1• Continued Discussion of Proposed P - Funding Options (25 edestrian Bridge minutes) ____________ 2. Update of Co -Pro os mmunity Connections Committee p ed Focus Group Meetings (Samantha Orduno) (15 minutes) ________ 3. Discussion Regarding COP's Activities (Diane Wuori, former Councilmember) OCTOBER 2, 1995 WORK SESSION PAGE TWO 4. Discussion Regarding Expanded Ins pec=tion Program (per Councilmember Quick) 5. Discussion of RFP Regarding Banking Services (per Councilmember Quick(10 minutes) 6. Discussion of Water/Sewerer/Sewer InfraQuick) Future Maintenance Needs/Set Fund (per (10 minutes) 7. Discussion Regarding Formalizing the Cable Committee (Samantha Orduno) (10 • OCTOBER 2, 1995 WORK SESSION PAGE THREE —�- 8. Continued Discussion Supervision of Caba TechCable nician (10 minutes) • Management of Overall Operations 9. Discussion Regarding Policy Communication to Public (from September 26, 1995 meeting) (10 minutes) ::::::::::::::::::::::::: 10. Update on Livable Communities Act (Jennifer Bergman) (15 minutes) 11• Discussion Regarding City's Recyclin Go /Lynnette Morgan) (15 minutes) g als (Paul Harrington OCTOBER 2, 1995 WORK SESSION PAGE FOUR 12. Hiscu sion n of Request for Rezoning, Gary Krig/Fran DeGross, 5497 Adams Street (Paul 13. Continued Discussion of Upgrading of Mounds View Drive (Paul Harrington) 14. Update of Highway 10 Redevelopment ActionsC • Blue House and Adjacent Properties lathy Bennett) (10 minutes) • Everest Other 15. Discussion of Business Loan/Mister Donut (Cathy Bennett) (10 minutes) OCTOBER 2, 1995 WORK SESSION PAGE FIVE 16. Discussion of MnDOT Variance for City Banners (Cathy Bennett) (15 minutes) ............::::: 17. Continued Discussion of Proposed 1996 Budget (15 minutes) 18• Discussion of Possible Innovative Grant Projects (Samantha Orduno) (10 minutes) OCTOBER 2, 1995 WORK SESSION PAGE SIX 19. Discussion Regarding Selection of Council St aff Strategic Planning Dates (Samantha Orduno) (5 minutes) / I T. . • . For the Week of September 25 - September 29, 1995 ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION We spoke to Phyllis this of hospital food morning and she sounded very willthe released soon and ho broth)and in good. She is sick, ger! sick and has wild cravings for a cheese burger! willbe activities.rNaturally, hopefully will get some rest before resumingg She rest, rest, rest. Knowing will ynot be at next City Council meeting. Monday night's meeting. all her many will be all rested and ready We told her to ************************** t0 go at the October The week has been s Newsletter. The pent Pulling together the information for the up-coming plan is to have the newsletter ready the Budget Informational Meeting on Octoberp °ming Budget ************************** for distribution 10-12 23. days before The North Metro Mayors Legislative Committee met yesterday to discus ready for City Councils to begin to completed within the next discuss the NMM legislative initiative. The slate should be co prioritize. two weeks and Related to this is a request from Councilmember with Novak and C unc lm tuber aSgenda This is Senatoro timely in that theQuick lltdiscuss the mCity's e Dick Pelle at the Nevem legislative ork ative completed their legislative AMM, LMC, RCLLG and NMM will have 1 of time to review and determine programs ch by itemsthat time and the a t to will have as 11 as matters that are not covered by the other groups. are most relevant to Mounds dew as well g ups. As soon as I receive the final 1996 legislative As Council review. This will for most important for Mounds dew. programs, I will develop easily identify the issues and approach a prioriti y tY matrix that Council feels I will be attending the LMC too be jealoust tndin get to Regional Meeting in Henning n next t will Thursday be back not to be terms the Friday he meeting with local businesses to discuss their in the develop City's current sign policies. The a sign ordinance that is a bit more flexible anurpose is dair needs in community, gather information and then sensitive to our business Samantha Attraction Efforts: • I had a meeting with the Director of Planning Systems this week. He was interested in I and Marketing rty in View. I learning fromavailable ilAabl Health iofn Moundsu Jones, prepared a Package of information for hiabm and ilavle Props Winnicki, O'Neil and Blue House properties. appreciative and will keepegave him a tour the area in mind for future planning was very • I had a lengthy discussion with Griffin Realtyg Purposes. They are currently looking regarding ies company. at the last site in the business park erties in Moundse Twin lotsng Cfor other We also discussed the O'Neil property for a re P PeWatson's Twin potential clients. We will be meeting and I w ll s owimhoseinite ♦ Dale Jones is working whim those sites. on hisproperty. with a developer who may be interested in a funeral I will keep you posted as this develops. Retention Efforts: home ♦ Paul and I have scheduled a sign ordinance I hav October a meeting for the businesses community to disc to their in , 1995. We will provide the lunch and listen intens the needs and wants for signage in Mounds View. attendance.' We hope to have high intently 9 CommunicationslMarketing: • I attended a communications meeting with is made up of communications de Sheri Linke this week. partments from several metro area cities t exchange ideas. committee Sheri and I will be working on an advertising business directory and the newsletter and will use the expertise Pnith ticy his group for sample policies. e Cathy • , PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY PARKS: ' * This week the hockey boards at both Hillview and La mbert painted with brown exterior and white interior colors new paint job has Parks have beenas made the aesthetics of the hockey boards much better. RECREATION: * After-school programs began this week. * Sharie is working on the Budget Brochure and the City * Winter programs are in planning stages. Newsletter. * Mary attended a cooperative venture meeting at the asked to provide transportation for families who are in the Center. a program which assists mothers and children - Family We have been a program aon, nutritional a information and foode WIC program, which is providing earlyachild development the transportation. vouchers. Our- part of the program is We will be picking up people participating in the WIC r at 8 different locations in both Mounds View and New Brighton to the Family Center, to New Market for grocery shopping program will the driver, using theNLion's bus. nd - transporting them churches, Eagle's Club, CountyCity This is a joint program wi again. Mary Mounds View Parks and RecreatoncDepartal Services �S and the New Brighton and GOLF COURSE' * John and crew continue to mow and aerate as time allows. greens. Other projects are completed * We have requested edges (iBrook from Nature various people with experience in board we can consider. Additional information regardingfloats boardwalks and brCenter) for improvements to the boardwalk that solicited. In addition, ideas regardinggand pilings have been in the air are being studied. Soil borigs ofathe hbo boardwalke on the ground versus required when considering future improvements to the boardwalk. information will be provided as it becomesggy area will undoubtedly be available. More CABS * The Cable TV Committee will meet again Thursday, October Hall. Until the time when Sue Henry begins (October 12 at 8:00 a.m. at City meeting, things are pretty much "on hold". 9) and the Cable TV * Jerry Skelly Jr and Dale Irving have been providi during the interim times. We really a ng back-up Cable TV assistance PPreciate them both. FORESTRY: * The trees at Silver View Park have been planted t * his-week. This week Rick and crew are working on a procedure which for passing existing tree diseases, hopefully saving several establishes a barrier located in the yards of four neighboring homeowners. raother trees that are Mary S. POLICE * The State visited us this week to do an audit on our record system. We passed the audit with flying colors. They don't grades, but they would have given us a b+. g e * The COP Task Force met this week. The main topic Halloween party and Crime Free Housing. was the * We Received 188 applications Officer. We will be conucting afwritten or the pex position of Police amination on October 14. * HEARD IT ALL DEPT.--- -- We stoped anoff a firecracker. He had a pack of cigaretteslin his yr. boy for shooting brought him home, his grandmother was there. She was away . We cigarettes, but she stated he was ONLY allowed to smoke aware of a the them at home. Tim R. FINANCE • Don attended the MN Government Finance Officers Asso ' Alexandria September 20 . 22. dation Conference in • Don has been working with Samantha & Dawn toet the the City Newsletter completed. g special budget edition of • Ramsey County says 1996 tax values should be finalized Will provide update of effect of proposed tax le vy when �n a couple of weeks. figures become available. • Otherwise business as usual for Finance Staff. Don PUBLIC WORKS * The Sewer Department raised a manhole that was covered of the Business Park. By getting the cover raised, it enabledduheg the construction cleaning of the entire sewers stem! em step will be to cut roots in then areas ide isquite an accomphm nto Tcomplehe next the system. Way to go Larry and Wally! tified when they were cleaning the * The Street Department is patching the sewer repairs on Traffic counts on MSA roads are complete and the results will and Knitted od. State as per requirements. will be submitted to the * The Water Department is starting to receive the materials Changeout. The anticipated start date is the 2nd week of for the Water Meter * Next week, Oct. 3, is the Snow Roadeo October. competition, and (3) that are volunteering.we have (4) mount Technical aCollege) On Oct. 5, an Operators participating Seminar n the day long event. is scheduled, with 1/2 of the crew attending the Tracy COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM Jennifer Bergrgan� Jennifer Moo athY-Bennett and I met this week with representatives of Gray, ty, Mooty & Bennett Law Firm to discuss uses of Tax Increment Financing money within the framework of our Housing Rehabilitation Program. rneys we spoke with seemed veryFinancing we usepofa Tit well informed on the most up to date legislation ocoverin As Staff, we found out some very useful things - some we liked, g we didn't. Options for consideration will be presented to the Council some in October or STATE PLANNING CONFERENCE I will be attending the Minnesota State Planning Conference i Thursday and Friday of this week. A major topic scheduled f Alexandria on Livable Communities Act (which also happensor discussion is the to be on the October Work Session Agenda). A number of cities are struggling with the guidelines out in the legislation - it will be interesting to hear their comments Also, ounds View will be getting some positive for compliance spelled P.R. at the conference - our Adult Uses�Ordinance will be part of a presentation on zoning for potentially controversial uses. Paul TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: SAMANTHA ORDUNO CITY ADMINI STRA T�R DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 RE: INDEX FOR WEEK OF OCTOBER 2, 1995 MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 2 1995 • ouncil Work Session, October 2, 1995, 6 p.m. ITEMS PROVIDED IN THIS WEEK'S COUNCIL PACKET • This Is It! • Agenda ****************** ADMINISTRATOR'S SCHEDULE (Please note that this schedule is sub 's as meetings are scheduled � ct to change At any time Michele , rescheduled or canceled. cand or Lynnette will have my most current schedule reached at all times. ) number where I can be Monday October 2 1995 6:00 p.m. Council Work Session Tuesday October 3 1995 9:00 a.m. Staff Meeting Wednesda October 4 1995 12:00 Possible Lunch with Mark date cancelled) Malone (previous -2- Thursday October 5 1995 2:00 p.m. LMC Regional Meeting Henning Frida Jul 21 1995 11:30 Focus Groups for Discussi (Businesses) on of Sign Ordinance CRY®F 11INDS REQUEST FUR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 2• M Pnum AGENDA SESSION DATE Report Number. 95-1466WS F, (l s n o DISPOSITION oQ Report Date: 9-28-95 Item Description: Update of Community Connections Committee Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/S � ,._ `c supplement sheets as necessary,) ST„"_-_ CU On Wednesday, met to September 27, the Kaiser, discuss members of who has isgraciously the proposed Communit the Community Connections present to discuss consented Y Focust Group usetin present her to conduct meetings. Susie Monday night to approach to the Focus the Focus Kaiser Groups, pr Focus groups as hare with the groups. Ms, was of format, well as herCouncil her background will be approach with the Committee's in the area The idea of conducting proposed regarding community COflg the Focus of educational needs. While t Groups was a result Committee u recreational he Committee membersof discussionsat should obtaintand social service had developed community service area more diverse dataneeds, it was fela list com uni facility. that would, in fact, from a cross that the pro to search Hence, the birth of the be the section of the Principal out the community idea of users and payers of the pal pinewood y needs and determine conducting Focus Princi al of terms noted, "relate how to, as Donna Nelson,s commun of educational the different The Co social and recreational components the to conduct requests that needs, ..of assist the severalru the Council support CommitteeFocusiGroups to gather the Committee's City/School District assessinginformation that proposal facility, community needs related Well further to a proposed Samara AilLumwa. '/ 1 /'//, a or. �y`�su? uno, ity Administrator STAFF REPORT PAGE TWO SEPTEMBER 28, 1995 The composition of the Focus Groups and format would be as follows: Elementary students Middle school students High Schools Students Parents of each students Senior citizens °f the above as well as parents of preschool "Empty Nester �� • e residents Business representatives Teachers and Social service providers Each group would be lists provided b o more than 14 me Y the District Viers, selected at random froIndividualsand the City. d invitation to would be contacted nfrom take part in the Focusmail with a callinvitations will ember of the Groups, followedrim30- 0 sent in each Committee. Approximately a Phone empty nesters may have a group (where Y 30-40 smaller random list possible, singles eand Ms. Kaiser will conduct the student Focusfrom which to choose) . the remainder of the groups at City Groups at the schools and Hall or another convenient It is anticipated that the It month October Focus Groups will be th with some groups meetingconductedmbr Each Focus in November, during the participant will receive purpose of the Focus a Information Sheet e o the Committee was formed Group with background explaining hdeveloped. The and the process by information werebasicgroups will be which the Focus froms the concept rather than allowed to �� Groups ty wants react to a pre-determined of co mbfree-flowing, by the Co phe a ed set of free toflowing, information Committee. The Groups their gathering groups are intended may related discuss the individual and identified Group are tos theyfeel proposed facility, needs as The information will be reporthform to gathered by both the Committee and MCou cil is. n and presented The up-comm December, in g election of three in Districts new school board element theeat s continued interest membersois a key the anticipatedafter the election in the Y members to the Committee will act. It is e newly elected date, update them on the Committee's with mmittee�s purpose OOTy OF IVN D� REQjTL+ST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section. 4. ARFPn FF um AGENDA SESSION DA Report Number: _9_5_____14_62rg TE October 2 1995 Report Date: _ DISPOSITION �""5-- - Item Description: Discussion Regarding Expanded Inspection Program Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. ,_4,46.4 UP ______________,....... imm..........--- ,.... . : ,.. -• '- - • r a ac supplement sheets as necessary.) ammumm Councilmember Quick has asked me to Program update the Council on the City and efforts to incorporate renter-o cueital Housing Inspection Pro y housing into that program. p ed, single famil g As apart of the 1994 Housing Stock Analysis, Staff researched and theof occupancy within the Community Determinationrelating y was based on records available from theCounty included relat neto created for tracking propert Y• This information the included in the datallow Staff to inspect and monitor those housing stock within Cit is homes on a yearly basis and will anticipated that in 1996, Itnter-occupied homes will 19the process of which are not begin. Staff will also continue to single inspecting family, legally homesteaded. pursue homes If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Taul Harrington, C. Iflunity Development p nt Coordinator CITY®� OoM�D� REQUEST FOR COUNCIL e CONSIDERATION Agenda nda Section: 5. TAF RF,Pnum AGEND Report Number: 95-1468w5 A SESSION DATE October 2 1995 Report Date: DISPOSITION — = Item Description: Discussion of RFP Regarding Banking Services Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Ex.lana '.. -- ry-(attach supplement sheets as necessary.) This item has been placed on the point of discussion laceregardingagenda per Councilmember the City's banking service status. a Samantha Or.�v.r'"�� • /(�� no, C ty Administrator OF e V REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda nda Section: T ' RFPpRm AGENDA SESSION DATE October 21995 Report Number: 19 9 5 Report Date: 9- DISPOSITION 2 9-9 5 Item Description: Utility Rate Survey (Per Councilmember Quick) Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Sum ary (attac •. .p ement sheets as necessary,) aUXUALOU Councilmember Quick requested information regarding ofs the Utility Departments . This information was availability of funds to the financial neatuthe of the utility requested to determine ent perform future maintenance, rehab, and replacement y infrastructure. In the past years Councils have desired to operate the Utilities on a break activities . summary of the funds available for capital WATER WASTEWATER $1, 746, 718 $1, 441, 724 These numbers do not hese reflect a completely accurate amount obtainavailable. of funds aaccurate fund balance operational needs has not been subtracted. To and operational needs would more depth analysis of the capital assets need to be conducted. To perform future projects, financing assessments . Staff could be accomplished through special assessments . regardingfconducted an informal goli for Council's their utility rates. survey of 10 metropolitan ' review. This information is listed below CITY W= Shoreview SEWERFLATRATE 1st 150008. . 584/1000 W/S 2nd 15000g. 1 . 027/1000 37• 51/gt 300008. + 6 . 87/qt water 1 . 491/1000 Blaine < 50000g. . 70/1000 Lino Lakes 40 . 80/qt 1 . 55/1000 Bloomington 46. 00/qt 25 . 00 1 . 55/1000 /Year water 9 . 70/month 3 . 50/mo W & S apt 8 . 85/unit =fnokd motel 8 . 60/unit . 63/100cu ft 3 X 1 63/at 100 cu. 4 . 75/qt water ft . win. quarter !! Fridley . 60/1000 incr. to . 90/1000 win. uarter 3 X 1 . 83 incr. to 2 . 50/1000 Spring Lake Park 1st 18000g. g• $22 Circle Pines 35 . 75 . 95/1000 comm. 1. 86/1000 1 . 17/1000 1. 17/1000 6 . 50/mo, water Lakeville 3 .25/mo. . 84/1000 sewer 2 . 50/qt . +win New Brighton 1. 77/1000 inc to 1 . 99/1000 74/1000 1. 95/1000 Moundwin. qt . X .31 wat oiv win. qt. X . 30 sew 1.20/1000 * The Avera 44/qt . 1995 win. ge water rate for the Metropolitan qt $3 wat Area in 1995 is $1. 55 questions is for Council' /10008, This information or comments, please feel free to n call ew ad discussion If you u have any s 47//12 /' -- '- 'Z''' Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works CITY OF REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATIO Agenda . N Section: OEW F RFpnRT AGENDA SESSION DATE Report Number: 95-1469WS October 2, 1995 Report Date: 9-28-95 DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion Regarding Formalizing the Cable Committee Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. ary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) Attached please find a Attached d please ma draftsn ordinance ordinance which would formally Mounds tue Cablealong the same organizational structurestas The EconomicrDevelopment Commission and other boards and co toh elaborate is meantnds startingaeas point from which the mayCouncil ommiab rn orcondense. withrmalizing the committee into a choose past practices and Cityfull policies. Samantha OrduOF dr 9 o, Ci •y Administrator ORDINANCE NO. 568 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MO ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 409, ENTITLED, "CABLE TELEVISION C VIEW BY COMMISSION" The City Council of the City of Mounds liew_dees__hereb SECTION I. Chapter 409, Entitled, "Mounds ViewY ordain: Commission" is hereby adopted as attached. Cable Television SECTION II. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days publication. Y after the date of its Introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Mounds day of October, 1995, View this Read and passed by the City Council of the City of of October, 1995. Mounds View this day ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 409.01 409.04 CHAPTER 409 CABLE TELEVISION COMMISSION 409.01 Establishment. The Mounds View Cable Television is hereby established. The Cable TV Commission is referred sion Commission "Commission". to herein as the 409.02 Pur ose. The Commission shall serve as an Commission to the City Council, hereinafter the "Council" Advisory television operations, programming and public informati ' on matters relating to cable Mounds View, en-aetivit�es in the City of 409.03 Composition Subdivision 1. A ointed Members OfficeQualification of Members Terms of The Commission shall be composed of five (5) equal voting appointed by the Mayor with approvalthe members diverse qualifications with practical experience consisting of the City Council. Members shall have public information techniques, cable television, of, not limited to, and general communication procedures. public relations, multi-media activities Subdivision 2. Term of A ointment Beginning January 1996, three members shall serve a three members shall serve two year terms. Thereafter, members shall staggered terms, with terms expiring December 3 serve year term and two terms, but not more than three terms shall 1 of each yearAt east towoofsuccessive appointees shall hold their offices until their successorsBoth original and these qualified (1988 Code, 32.03). are appointed and Subdivision 3. Designated Members In addition to membership, one non-voting member shall be designated by serve as liaison to the Commission. The term of appointmentappointed one year, except that they the City Council,to will terminate with the office rom which shallordinarily non-voting be for ppointment is derived. n voting 409.04 Conflict of Interest. No person shall be appointed personal interest likely to conflict with the general public interest. appointed shall find that his/her private or personalPP rated with private or matter coming before the Commission, he/she If any person interests are involved in any part in action on the matter; alternatively, he/she may be dish him/herself ea from taking majority vote of the Commissioners in attendance. qualified by a two-thirds 409.05 Compensation compensation. Members of the Commission shall serve without 409.06 Vacancies. Subdivision 1. Termination of A desiring to terminate his/her a ointment. hie/her term shall give written appointment ation tosoy Commission ppointment to the Commission before the expiration ember intentions. It should be the the Commission Chairperson f notify th of City Council promptly duty of the Chairperson of the Commission shall a P mptly of any vacancies. appoint a new The Mayor, to notify the the term.amember from applications receivedywithar the unf of the City tY Council, lied-portion of be removed from officeSubdivision 2. Removal from Office. the entire Ci for just cause and on writtenycha member f the Commission of such a vote is Council. Such membermay for non-attendance at Co may be entitled to a by a least four-fifths of appointed member may Public hearing before regularly non- tte ddnled Commission meetings if a Commissioner oner isd meetings by the City Council prior consent of the Commission.per year or from three consecutive nt from five mmission. meetings, with the 408.07 Or anization Meetin s Subdivision 1. shall appointOroanization At the first regular meeting Commission shall be sbject Chairperson from to among its voting of the year, the term. The appointment shall subject hair tshollC oamo a mems of This serving carotaten memo and shall consist of a one also electg ina that capacity from more than g members, with no Commissioner ons year two consecutive terms. The Commission may create andglits s ch appointed members for a term The of one a shall determine to transact Commission of one year. other offices from its members as it may business. Subdivision 2. one re Regular Meetings The Commission shall hold gular meetingeach month resolution. a time which the Commission shall fix at least by Chairpersonior b Subdivision any �ecial Meetings y two members of the Comm sioecial meetingsamay be called b the Clerk-Administrator who then shall notify time andr date of the specialby written noticed filed the m fY all members of the Com a east three days before the Commission of the Subdivision 4. meeting date. members shall constitute a4uor m' A majority of the appointed Ppointed voting Commission Subdivision 5. Votin Privile es. Each the appointed members shall have equal voting privileges. Subdivision 6. governance and the transaction of The Cbusiness.ommission shall adopt bylaws an governance basis for the first regulary s for its The bylaws will be reviewed on meeting in February. attendance Subdivision 7. Rem A recording abstentions t each Commission meetings, a record of resolutions,n ,shall keep a record of be a public record requiring a vote. The record of the Command fission shall from the Commission Subdivision 8. Re ort. The City Council may request the the omembers Witoaut having-received consent of ' -t annualy am report • - tmaion.ori pedal meeting of the Commission) � of 409.08 Expenditures Council such funds asmay The Commission may re quest be necessary and proper for the conduct the City 409.09 Duties of the Co its duties. Commission shall: Commission. In order to carry on its purpose, the (1) To serve as a liaison to the City Council government cable television Channel 1g in the programming of (2) To provide an informational and Public relations outlet through use of cable television. (3) To develop and work towards an understanding of the benefits of cable television communications. (4) To provide Mounds View residents t community more fully and tohe opportunity to understand their of community life. participate more successfully the process (5) To produce, oversee and evaluate television programming endeavors on (6) To communicate co ob' programming e ' Council. � ves to the Mounds View City (7) To develop an awareness of the public relations efforts through the local m eSt channel through conro inued press and cable television. P s' city newsletter, (8) To encourage individual resident and ' television. institutions to make use of cable (9) To work in concert with the North Suburban Cable Access and the North Suburban Cable Commission to help facilitate the naw approach to community programming in the ten City franchise area. (10) To help develop and initiate television programmingarea. significance in conjunction with other cities of the North gruwide Commission. Subb urban Cable WY OF DV, REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: $adZEILLEQULE AGEND Report Number: 95-1470WS ASESSIONDATE October 2, 1995 Report Date: DISPOSITION Item Description: Continued Discussion of Cable Operations Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. • ummary y (attach supplement sheets as necessary,) SVIQUcii This item is continued from the September Work seeking Council direction as to the cable operations, Session. Staff is cable operntions i.e. ,nd if liaison supervisory(incluresponding supervision for remain technician the activities CableCommittee)p jurisdiction of lthelPaarkoa and su envision of be transferred to should Administration. Recreation Department or A (iLL›-a- Sama tha Orduno, ity Administrator k CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF MOUNDS VIEW CABLE COMMIE E Thursday, September 14, 1995 8:00 a.m. R.J. Riches Restaurant CALL TO Mounds View, Minnesota ORDER The meeting was called to order at 8:00 a.m. Chairperson Jerry Skell ATTEN• ', CE by Committee Present at the meeting Were Chairperson Skelly, member BarbaraCinHaake and Don Hodes Committee- members Johnson and Parks and Hodges, TV Department representative Sharie Linke. Recreation Council Liaison Susan Hankner, Commi Meier and CTV Liaison Dale I tteemember Peg REPORT OF ung were absent. CABLE PRODUCER Cable Producer Johnson familiarized the Committee with her work schedule noting that she is allotted 20 hours She gave a brief break-down of the t' various activities thus far. mle needed for her per week. • Council Meetin Production. three hours to install new It takes approximatelyeach Council Meeting. An additional o erhourois needed for set-up. Council meetingsneeded three hours with tear-down needinnother _ hour, for a total of a approximately �'° to month Counciltal approximately mate) 7-8 one-half Yhourstwicea Meeting Production. • Council Meetin Re la s, live Council In addition to broadcasting Meetings, it is necessary after each meeting; to dub two tapes the recording secretary.one for public viewing and one for our only two decks and aremedoneaineS are dubbed using Example: To dub a real time". hours, times two tapes, hour meeting it takes two dubbingess peS, equaling four hours. The must be monitored by the producer for sound levels. • Scala Gra hies. Another eight hours per used up programming the Scala, the computerized month is system used to provide the " board" whichrid scrolls continuallyon bulletin programs are not iringhannel 16 when specific I City of Mounds View Cable Committee Minutes September 14, 1995 Page three REPORT OF PRODUCER (CONT'D) Committeemember Haake made a motion to direct Cable Producer Johnson to explo re the prices equipment for possible purchase this ea f the needed96 eta dependent upon bud Y or in 1996 budgetary limitations and Council approval. b i Mot on y Committeemember g The motion was seconded approved 4 ayes, 0 nays. Hodges. Ms. Johnson informed the Committee that the Administration DepartmyH for use in the production of he 1996 da deo Budgetcamera ideo. She stated that Administrative Intern Dawn Postud n ek would be producing the video as part of her internshipbu ° ld Johnson was asked to participate in the editin t that Ms. Committeemember Haake suggestedg Process. or the Administration Department that Ms, postudensek, be listed as Producer, because nent, or Finane Department Ms. John artistic control of the project, and would son onlwbeli not have consultant position. Y m a REPORT ON NEW FORMULA FOR NSCC GRANTS TO CITIES FOR 1996 Chairperson Jerry Skelly, Sr. reported Suburban Cable Commission has been discussing o n formula for awardingo a new would be to give each grants flat amount f cities. The current proposal oney. Additional funds would be then awarded to each Ci according to their subscribershi �' commented that she was concerned about t cities teemeha et d d not Haake iuse their funds towards cable television activities, stating that even though their subcribership may be higher, if theyidn't not use the funding towards cable production, it would still didn't be equitable. SENIOR PRO- GRAMMING SERIES Chairperson Skelly gave the Committee an overview proposed program for Seniors which would be co-hosted a Peg Meier and Jerry hosted a magazinetype riy Skelly, Sr. Producer Johnson suggestedby format in which each host would be responsible for their own "package." The discussed some of the categoriesthatcould bincluded Committee the programming such as "Healthded in People Features, Senior activities around and Fitness", Community Chairperson Skelly requested thatthe area. ideas regarding senior programs with Ms. Linke share some as she is involved with programming unself and Ms. Meier City of Mounds View. P gramming of senior activities in the 1k City of Mounds View Cable Committee Minutes September 14, 1995 Page Five DISCUSSION OF CABLE COMMITTEE MEETING TIME CHANGE The Committee discussed the possibility meeting every quarter to an evening met ng.chAfterng one discussion, Committeemember Haake made a After maintain the meeting schedule as the second motion to each month at 8:00 a.m. as this scheclul ,, _ ursday of for each of the members. The motion was seconded by well Chairperson Skelly. Motion approved 4 ayes, 0 nays. NEXT MEETING The next meeting is scheduled for Th 8:00 a.m. at the Mounds View City ursday, October 12 at C Hall in Conference Room ADJOURNMENT A motion was made by Committeemember econded by Committeemember Haake to adjou nthe meetin at 10:00 a.m. Motion approved 4 ayes, 0 nays. g Respectfully submitted,, Sharie Linke, Administrative Assistant Mounds View Parks, Recreation and Forestry Dept. /sl CM OF 111VPOSREQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDE TION A genda Section: 9. W TA (lu F RFPm AGENDA SESSION DA Report Number: �5_l���T,a TE October 2, 1995 Report Date: DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion Regarding Policy Communications to Publi Administrator's Review/Recommendation: s - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanatio .. . aiallaZUM ac supplement sheets as necessary.) This item was referred to the October Work The item stems from the discussion regarding the e Session from the September 26 Council Meeting. communicate (via printed and cablen media) g extent to which the City can and should issue during the discussion was timing and frequency proposeduy Council actions/policies.nca ionathe policyly, an guidelines for which actions require what Y of communication efforton and policy type of communication effort. Y This is a general discussion item, but does have a specific communication, to the public, of the proposed Assessment focus and that is the Staff awaits Council discussion and directi Policy prior to its adoption. on. 4111. Sa antha a rduno, C Administrator CM®F • 1111EW N193REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION A Benda Section: 10auFzuOR PT Report Number: AGENDA SESSION DA 9.5_.14� j� TE Drfinhar 1 Report Date: DISPOSITION Item Description: Update of Livable Communities Act Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. ���,_'�1' 114111111.111immissommommilli LET T:M:��:�••,,y ummary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) yl By November 15, 1995, each municipality must decide whether to Communities Act by resolution. One of the elements of the Act is participateein Affordable the d Livable Housing Opportunities Amount (ALHOA) the and Life-Cycle which shows how much each municipality must spend annually to create affordable and life-cycle housing. To spent the ALHOA amount toward affordable and life-cycle housing each If n city must justifyst amount to the Metropolitan Council or local housing that they have later decides theyg not,h they must submit the want in, they must buyinto the authority.. F e a City chooses not to participatedownro and City chooses to participate, they program. For example, if five years the road, a ALHOA is Every would have to pay the past five ALHOA year they calculate a new ALHOA amounts. For 1996, our amount. By participating in the Livable Communities Act, we are eligible funding accounts set up by the Metropolitan Council: Taxg to receive funding Communities set yn Program and Base Revitalization Program,gfrom three separate Local Housing Incentives Account. Livable The Tax Base Revitalization was created to clean up contaminat commercial/industrial redevelopment. This fundin � land for subsequent Contamination Cleanu g can be used in conjunction with DTED's they will not be ligib a for Cleanup City does not participate in the Livable Communities Act, up Program. The Livable Communities Demonstration Program activities to municipalities gam makes grants or loans for Cornet acts to link participating in the Local Housing Incentives Program. 'Thissy funding candevelopment housing,jobs and transportation. For example, a developer is creating ding can be townhouse/condominium project that will be affordable to all income will be building neighborhood services such as a drugstore, convenience store and coffeenshoe developer p Jelopr Berg, , Hous'/"inspector STAFF REPORT PAGE TWO SEPTEMBER 28, 1995 The Local Housing Incentives Account authorizes the Metropolitan Council meet negotiated affordable and life-cycle housing to make grants to the policies of the Metropolitan Council. Cities can use this fundingto goals that are consistent with and promote including acquisition, rehabilitation and construction of meet housing housing. permanent affordable and life cycles By December 15, 1995, each city must submit goals established-ill-cooperation Metropolitan-Council. In order to establish goals, the Met Councilus with the guidelines. I have attached the "Draft Housing Goals Agreement" which given es the some percentages. The "City Index" column describes the amount Mounds View is currently providing for affordable housing. The `Benchmark" column shows what we providing. The table states that 89% of our homeowners have homes valued should be ,0 below which is considered affordable. Byat $115,000 or Met Council has determin comparing cities of similar size and location, the ed that 69 - 87% of housing should be affordable. We are well ete our benchmark. The Livable Communities Act was created to take a proactive approach at making communities livable. The three funding sources that they have established could P City of Mounds View in creating housing programs for our citizens. Attachedhelp the No. 4823 supporting the Livable Communities Act and statingthe Ci Mod View be a participant, City of Mounds View will HOUSING GO�R.�FT METROPOLITANLIV ABLLE AGREEMENT CO�IIILI�,TITIES ACT PRLN'CIPLES The city of Moundskiiew supports: 1. A balanced housing supply, with housing available for people at all income levels.b 2. The accommodation of all racial and ethnic groups in the purchase, sale, rental and location of housing within the community. 3- A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life-cycle. 4• A community of well-maintain-ed housing and nei and rental housing. ghborhoods, including ownership 5• Housing development that respects the natural env' striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing of the community while 6. The availability of a full range of services and facil' •es types and costs. improvement availability tof. access tand linkage between housing and employmenor its residents,t and the GOALS To carry out the above housing benchmark indicators for communities t es of similar location principles, the City of on and stiew agreesage of to use affordable and life-cycle housingg efforts given goals for the period 1996 to 2010, and omake its best market conditions and resource availability, to maintain an i development as benchmark ranges for affordability, life-cycle and density index within the AffordabilityCITY INDEX BENCHMARK GOAL OwnershipMEI 89% 69-87% MIMI Rental I 54% 35-50% 1e rn single family Owneerenter 11 Density Single-Family Detached I 2.3/acre IIMEMIIIIII 10-13/acre To achieve the above goals. the City of Moundsview elects to participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Local HousingIncentives Metropolitan and submit a plan to the Metropolitan Council by June 30, 1996, indicating l actions it will take to carry out the above goals. the CERTIFICATION Mayor Date Affordable and Life-Cycle Housing Opportunities Amount For %'loundsview Your ALFIOA Amount for: Moundsview 1996 $U Not required 1997 (Estimate) SO RESOLUTION NO. 4823 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION ELECTING TO PARTIC]PATE IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT CALENDAR YEAR 1996 WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (1995 Minnesota establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended to ad other development issues facing the metropolitan area Laws Chapter 225) 473.121; and defined by Minnesota Statutesat housingand section WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, comprising Revitalization Account, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account and the Local Housing the Tax Base c Incentives Account, is intended to provide certain funding and oth area municipalities; and er assistance to metropolitan WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive Metropolitan Council to negotiate with each municipality to establish housing grants or loans under the goals for that municipality that are consistent with and promote he able and life-cycle Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development of the WHEREAS, by June 30, 1996, each municipality Guide; and actions the municipality plans to take to meetthe established l housing ofy to the a s; an Metropolitan Council the WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council must adopt, goals; and the negotiated affordable and life-cycle housingp ' by resolution after a public hearing, goals for each municipality by January 15, 1996; WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality which elects to and Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each participate in the Local Housing year; and WHEREAS, for calendar year 1996, a metropolitan area municipality Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 only if (a) the munici all p �'can participate under Housing Incentives Account Pro P ty elects to am by November 15, 1995; (b) the Met pol taneCouncil and the municipality successfully negotiate affordable and life-cycle housing and (c)by January 15 the Metropolitan Council adopts by resolution the life-cycle housing goals for the municipality; goals for each municipality; negotiated affordable and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the City of Mounds View hereby elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Act during the calendar year 1996. P an Livable Communities Dated this day of 1995. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator WY OF VOS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section:tila-ElitaYlPpRT Report Number: 4.5_'4' ' — AGENDA SESSION DATE October 2, 1995 Report Date: DISPOSITION - =-95 Item Description: Discussion Regarding City's Recycling Goals Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Ex•lanat'•. , • : tach supplement sheets as necessary.) Lynnette Morgan has recently assumed the res basisn her untilJanuary 1) of recyclingpossibilities (on a part-timeae recycling activities to date and that memo issattache ked her to u by the tonnage reports from the first and second update me d accompanied Several Councilmembers have quarter. reng goals for the coming the desire to may be revisited. g year, noting that the issues of discuss he City's This item is single hauler This Councilt direction as it on the reaagenda as a discussion item with the request for 1996 recycling efforts and goals. Agit Sama tha Or.�.�" / no, ' ity Ad 'nistrator MEMO TO: FROM: Samantha Orduno, City Administrator RE: Lynnette Morgan, Administrative Aide DATE: September 27, 1995 Recycling Update Attached herein is the first and second Quarter Tonnage Reports. Listed below is summarization of the recycling activities conducted during the last two months. a • Coordination of Fall Clean Up Day(October 21, 1995) • Assisted Ramsey County Division of Solid Waste with the Business Outreach Pro'ec with Mounds View City businesses. J t • Landfill questionnaire to Licensed Garbage Haulers regarding location of disposing garbage and waste p g of • Continuation of Recycling Sweepstakes program • Promotion of Waste Reduction Week advertised in September/October Newsletter • Developed a Welcome to Mounds View letter informing new residents of licensed garbage haulers in the City and information regarding recycling bins IIIiiii JIliIIiiiiii -Y! 1 OOOOOO m • 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 00 0 0 0 00 ? .0 O O O O n 0 , aiiJI OO OO OpI OO �• 00 00 00 OO dO OI O O • • p 0 0 111 1,yII , ' ,O00OOOO ,iIii1iiiiiII ,r ,, 1 0. rim," , 1 O 0 . 0 . 0 . 12 a 000000 0 - o - w 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W O C7 a w } 8. 8. 1fir N O 111 OJ 00 M Oc� III . 0 „; viIh:°IVI U. II wZ tqs � N M�; lii aIIIi oco coo rn iIIiIi o o o o c011111 'II 00 • . 000 H 111111 a w III I IIiIiiIii1IJJIIJIIJIIJj r- OC q O Y + i _La _ U :11: co 0 y O Y o O 0 78 0 30 ' 11111 111111 • N M 1 II l00000 0 0 0 6 O0OOO • • -c0OOOp s M LL O OO OO OOOp pO11 a 0 0 o O IIIIIIIIIIIIiii . 11 I i 2' 8' O p 11111111 O1 d o O d 3• •• 0000 0 0 0 0 „.., ” ,,, III1111111111 ,.�� • nom ■■ 1111111111 i 11111111111111 111111111111111 ccO O. 000 p o lilt§ LO oo ooW cc a, O OW C7 p� }giciiin„,081111s. � ��"ca O'Ii •,; „utile(' L iZ i Ills U I •• ON�- o 0 00 a. II 00 . 0 ,, c., cc o O iiiiiiiiiintelligg9, 1" Ili p M O CA CO p CO F- 0 ::00 0 0 0 0 p II o • pII-EDO aO O IN ii • • p1 M IIIiIii/iiiii M O� � CV 3 1111ff 3IIffhiUhIIi ate+ ig „-- iiiiiiiiiir m o p 0 0 0 Y 0 0 O 0 oppp000 mop O s o c O a s L • IIIIIIIIIIII 11 a O Oco la_ O 0 0111 N 0 co p O O 0 60_ O O ,, 11111111111, IiL ! p000p0p O O O 'ill II In O 1111 II III 1r I 111111 LI O p 0 0 0 0 II IN O O O O p p p o ii GC � a V O O • • • • • 11111 %ter; II O o o o e 8 + c} O M 0 I- Q a co O O O Z g U a) a O 00 J CC aa, .i L(7 • • I.n ►� N 11 CO 03 0 0 it O O IN M M " 11111 V ' • • • • O O :f5 O w O O �9Gir_ s i i. , LO CV 1 ilini;„,,Inci .. 03.. Z 0 , ..... :=,.."1" 1 1 nit. co. . p pO O p pO D Q lin In I lilt it II II 0iti � � . � o� e�- M 3 W Yc i ii O 0 OO O6 0 OU O N m O 0 co i2 ilii:::::,.:„.:..,..:7......;.:...:.:i.....:::::;:.,.:::..:::,.....:0::..4.0.,...,:...:.:............i,...;...i:..,:.:...:..:::::.;:k7:::...::..:.......:.:.....,.:..:...;:....:.i.;::..;:..f..1: 1 cia „,..:::::.1.::00..:..;.:::::.::::::...L.p._:,..;11.,:ii:::1 111111 la-'iv••rihri:'::::'fri•,.::."......"..1 1 „, ,::::::w.„„,. :::::., (TIPS g 111111111 Ln I r� iIIIIIIII illill _J :E 11 Qi!Iiiiiiiii 1. An Acc>: JIHi ':fit? 54?”;"s <: I I ::..'!.:::.i:;.:..':::.:::.:!:::..?::::::: I I 111111 I 11111 N • N • - Cp a) r' . fo itIII (10!I (! YoC p � O a t II II II I III 111 II 11100104 83 p ogill, 0 0 0 0 0 ;1: 101 II I • 00000 • • • O 0 O o . p mo .' 00 • o „o11p,1"id H cci. L II100000000"od'0" I" W OOOOppOOp OOO fr a �:11 II IiIIIIflII'j0 :o !3iOo o gill 0 � OZ la �+ Ln ^ V - 0 00a�, 0 • • • • 00 • o III V • O O • p W cc 1 O • • ' • • C^O - 00 N • '- � • LO .. • O ^ Oit it ! , ,' o ist �1 Int nni 1 IiJF .. ao ! , ,it ch 00 0 .O O N O' 0� gliOWa c CC�, oo �c � }, rnO co � U � lL"CSOR O Y++ a) O f0IIO LL aO"' Y 3 QQm ° O O o� 11111111 O Cy • • c— : y' .. p o o o o 011 . 0 .1 .1 i'<` ; CD 0 0 0 0 00O000o ;>t,:.: iiiiiiiin gX a. il I a 2 8 8 8 nom oo ~ ° ooooa0ooo 000 co 0 Q_ 000 o ion; IJ[ 1lliji II IiiiJIiIII[ ! J H is O2000 op ooo 8 8 Op • '«? ?'� W NEI o po 0 NN co W COO Lo O O o o o es ° 1111111Lc'11111 zz U W • • • • o • O O p O `" p • Wo O -In in ININI:j JIll N 11.....;..s...:'::1 o • O „,„„ N. CD 3(ss 1 cv, nic5filling 0 N z a)I O p f0 O iiii O C° 00 . CC) 00.. .,...., +, to O ` NN Cp M (..) 0_ 00 1111111!, y I iii! Ycc o 1111 c;c41 a OC ! ? ?h11411! 0 0 :1111'1' O p '::: ' 111111111 :::` II 11818 O • Op O `#E '0 O 0 a OOO twli 111011191 11111116 I irnriir pO ''�'` ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • a 0000000 o O000 o ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O O O O O E4 z' cc 0 0 0 0 O :cr : Q _ _ OO ...' \ o 0 II ,J. ico• • • • p . Opi '. m' W OO8 p OO p Vim,:ZZ • '''9i; ' 111111 1 • • 00p N co 0 iiiii , ,, ' 01,1 N %- 1 ilito. g.).11111 ,,,,,,,::,.:::..:::.:,:::....:•:...::::....:,,...,0,..•:.:,,•:::..•.•,6::„.:,::::,,i„,:::::,.:,::::,.•::,:.:.•.::.:.::::,::.,.„:„.,::,::::...•:...•:,,,.:::.! 1 iiiiimillip,0111 i;JQy^; oTfooiltol IIiiILLJJJIIiiiiJ Qi:::E30z' :E t3A> la_ .. co ca.SkiiC:Km 11111111 .+.,,,'.p ` >E ` a_..„„„.:,„.„„„„::::::,,.,:,:,:::„„u? 0 : ; iuit?: :> ::>:;: i'IIh7hIIi wi Z it YE'?K;I{: ;i N N ' gill i Li' : : Ex:EEEi• ::•i iiIIIIIIiIIii• CM OF IVREQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section; 12. F RFp RT Report Number:95-1474WS AGENDA SESSION DATE October 2, 1995 Report Date: 9-28_ 5 DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion of Request for Rezoning, Gary Krig/Fran Degross, ' e._Ii -- Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Ex. : .: •. -. -. ary(attach supplement sheets as necessary.) GarySVAMUAILL Krig has made application for Adams a Rezoning of the the Street.requesting property is currently zoned B-2 Limitetyd Businesseat theapplicantto support his a B-3, Highway Commercial classification in ordersubquentplans to sell the property to Fran Degross. a Conditional part of Pthistapp allow the Mr. Degross is requesting approval a business on the site. The Automotive repairl business of a PProval of district with the issuance ofC.U.P. Automotive repair a C.U.P, ess is allowable in a B-3 Chapter 1125. 01 Subdivision 1 identifies those factors upon which the Planninge) of the View Municipal decision relative to anyg Commission should base its their relevance, rezoning request. Those factors are as follows: and an analysis of1) Relationship to Municipal Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan identifies this parcel as commercial. Neighborhood Co neighborhood Municipal Code, Commercial, as defined in the immediate neighborslandsnotrthees CoPmmuvityd for the benefit of Community as a whole. 2) Geographical area involved The parcel is bounded on the South by Fedor's Mar North by a non-conforming Nhrph. The on-t g gas station and small strip� To the shops. T property line abuts R-4 property mallicis plexes. To the East is Adams Street. on which is Paul'Harrington, Commu 'ty Development Coordinator dinator STAFF REPORT PAGE TWO SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 3) Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed Except for the aforementioned gas uses in the vicinity of the rezoningtation intent of the Comprehensive Plan designation.nsi existingetwith landth are consistent cases are much less of an impact on the area than the These shop would be. uses are proposed repair 4) The cc ar nater of the surrounding area Beyond the immediately e in the vicinity adjacent properties useiin the in nature.f the subject the rwhell land CountyPrOperty�is overwhelmingly subject property provides a Road I to the north of the that direction, barrier which reduces impact in however. 5) The demonstrated need for such use Currently, only the Saturn dealership repair service of the type being provides automotivegh of home repair shops do exist wi within the City,Although a number whenndiscoverededenon-conforming and are ordered toy cease gre by the City. operation The Mounds View Planning Commission reviewed this September 20, 1995 meeting request at their decision was based and have recommended denial. indicated in the Comprehensive Plan,e current designation of Their the property Following discussion and the Automotive direction on the meritsannin Repair a rezoning request, the g Commission and City application can be reviewed at the Council levels. I have included all materials received as part of this application as well as an area map detailing the subject If you have any questions, property, call. ons, please do not hesitate to give me a PLANNING APPI,ICATIpN APPLICANT: (Z, a fr-c-1 • fi.a ADDRESS: ( 0 Phone Street Address, City, State, and Z Co ` '�' ' Interest in Prope P Code t. �� S,S'( � _� nY�(af�eck appropriate box): Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee, Operator, Manager ❑ Agreement to PurchaSe Other (explain) Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before fie!City action of PROPERTY INVOLVED: /Ge Address this request nera) Location , Y 9 -SCnpfj0n or Property Identification Number 0 " Legal O�er: Name/Address Ga, 3 -z 3 - t z- C S-) _ 6 2/ Present Use (check appropriate box): ❑ UndevelopedNacant ❑ Single Family Dwelling ❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling ❑ Muiti-Family (No, of Units ( - Business/Commercial ❑ Industrial Establish me i Establishment ❑ Other (explain) .. Property Classification: 0 Abstract REQUEST: Q�Tornens �A , - AII,Girs.i1L -4714 et:" ' moi11111111 " i.4. . IP.• / - 1. "Please note: Applicant may be responsible for additional I HEREBY DEC fees associated With DECLARE THAT THE ABOVEthe review of this request STATEMENT ARE TAUS * }U **** Signature /acts,/TijnYT1 ********!***** R-1$200/A-2-575.ail '•, maximum$1.000 Park ****************:******* �..- .....-TI .. A-1 to R-2-575. eU 5200 Fund Dedicates Fee Develop./Site Plan Review 575 all ott> � Dere Paid Minor Subdivision �v 51 /sae,minimum ''`' Receipt Herber Major Subdivision $150 um 100,maw�� Date F Paid C"P Plan Amendment 5200 Plus 5250 deposit Date Pati 1t�'DO CO �w Alteration mPermit SS5O plus deposit determined by Ste Number ��'sj�� Puo'g s.°n $50 '�dd�°"a'F..Paid �1�6F PUD Amendment $350 I 0 Dam Paid $150 Fleceipt Nanber • °°'' g-"7` - A Data o final actio" Planning Gee No. vED 0 DE0, aar.D CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING - • .. - CAT . APPLICANT; �r ADDRESS: r `'� one _ 7 R.:- " ,. City, State, and Zip Code - s Street Address, 04014 interest in Property P rty (check appropriate box): ❑ Owner of Property 3r ❑ Contract for Deed Owner . 1° Er Lessee, Operator, Manager -r as ❑ Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other (explain) Documentary evidence of applicant'sinterest in the Propertp y may be required before fly City PROPERTY INVOLVED: °`t'°"of thisre4uest Address/G' e - Location • 'II ok_, ( • 6r .S . Legal Description or Property Identification Number Le� O��r: N�me /Addre ' - •3 o - 2 - i z a 0 z I r J L. `S 1 ecQ, Cwt Present Use (check appropriate box): ❑ UndevelopedNacant ❑ Single Family Dwelling ❑ Multi-two Family Dwelling O Business/Commercial lY (No. of Units CI ess/Commerc Establishment ❑ iEstablishment Other (explain) Property Classification: ❑ Abstract ErTorrens REQUEST: e i �� 1 • � _ f Y amp. ... *Please note: • •pticani - - 1 �/ ' Y be responsible for additional - ' •z 4 ii , �I HERESY DEC' fees associated with the review of this r_. est Ocr r AAE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRU _ t �e� bay Rezoning 'f*:+e'�t+ra*+►s**,t+es,r,raw*,re rre+r r:,r _ �. g" _ naiuna Van- �•- R�-1�/�.minimum S20G "*'''t'e+re�e•,r+ea Si„+e,e*m**,r,►,r*+,rr,r,r �� Code R,1 do R 575.ail others 5200 um 000 Park Fund Dedication **:,•,•,r,ex 2-575.all others 5200 Dale Paid mber doP/Site Plan575 Mmol Develop./Site Revue 5100/acre.minimum 100.m $500 ~Pis Paid Major Subdivision diviaioR 5150 Total Fees Paid Comp. Plan Amendment 5200 Plea S250 deposit Dam Paid Planningw Wetland Weandnd BufferarPermit Prtrnt SIO plus deposit determined by Staff Receipt Number � Sign Additions/Fee Paid Date Paid PUD Amendment 5$50 Receipt Number Date of find action —� u ' '� y APPROVED CI DENIED ❑ DataPlanning Case No. ^ ❑ TABLED Admin.Account No. 7947 PARK ""' GR. ENFIELD " °'`M Q •®N N I NI N INI N ®! 1721I1 I� N N N N N ry DR� 2245 ""�1'• 2 nil 1:7:2'3 CM � NNN N N.N h Olgib leno : rI 7927 S n N p!`ao�,•�� r� N N ry N ZIP • A f� N N ry N N 2233 �a a = W • �Wen m � . - D' �o Ii® H M 1p N N r M. N ry Y el ` _ •W N N N 0�5� ag N•N N N:.`N INV. N {.1 '&Val ; g', r<, 40 Is cA Eli p o ry ••moi+ N N N N NUNIU N No 70 IN N NIN N f• O p LL! N .'I M I •Ch N N N N N..,_N I.NIN COI _ M M Mj Nj' 1^ O p HILLVIEW- N .N muniocoBaNIALHOMVIEU_APARGEK o o I m P R N ry M M .M N CSI N N N N N N N N N I IN N b RD OAKWOOD b u) N a N N��N -DR � N N NN O 41 m N b 561• �-� N N ^ b ® N N .N.N . OAKW000 N N N N m O p O I O I m n 112 fljN N CV N 0 _hr. M • PARK I I ININ N NI NI(V N • O ���� CZC3E N N N N O- at a 2 1.- 5590 l.Z.y/► ., O N N NN_ ^. ._i._ in ^ q M (� MI Mart „ m I O AKkVOOD N N NIN N "' ^'IN O 1.4 a11r) ^EMII 5.�� ".�•• ©A�:'7�� N N N N MN NIN N N N N NI18 r NIN lily ` _ .. N �•I�saH r� DR ^ ^ SSS W ESEE Lm ��>'i/N N N N W� IMMOligi al ''' g' Ci) N N N N N N �O N N N eo EMI ' '�a�' m rte. 'o m �R g�®• n 53 M. 141/91.1 N ry .N N b h O R4Cr a®a N ;.4. N N O) M ^ in 554- 141 N N O C M M M 1� f v ^ MR �N� N N N fV N N�N N N N N N n N N N N�.Ip�pIO CIN h ~ 1553• Mal OV)) Al n n 00 {�.jyj N VON NIN N cOV NIO b 122 i o 0 DR ~ N N®®{•-�'� �' 1N N. N N Nn N. H T N N �- ^ b b _� •ib► M _m _ `• p V O ^ �N 'PINEWOOD ����11����lllll(N ppfV N� 404 � ZNNNNNN N N N O b O OM M 2 b :S (/� C b D`i NN O fN N N NN N I N N 5521MEM ® N N •N 'N bNtlWI O _ a n ^ b l� p� _p ® N NIN..N N N N®®NN ® NIN I N ~ M 0, _O O) O� n } O RD es, ;', C71 74 474 N NIN O _ ^ N M O O O N N N N Q N. N M 1n C4'. 5512 5511 7661 . N 5505 N klall an 5504 M PINEWOOD s48o �= 5500 SCHOOL 1= LO In 764, ®� ® r $445. ®nizmi ® w 7$31 . • r ®®y/! R s� t— il� O sT El- cri FQ-17521 _ - 5440.. 5441 g \G fn CC �•.:, •......, 5439 Eli ^ ^ ^ to v rn J:. W ® N N M z 7501 5420-'1. 5427 �� . F O LJ I 5401 540 ®M M.N C 5 it N!ry •_5405 .: �. NINElk', NN ' n ^ 5395 BRONSON N IMMIT ' 'D DRIVE 5 ,7%.'1.:2.41; I N N 5380 5387Q N+I N N N :N N H '',1 :•44 5 4 (L � 5380 x+5381 Y I cv .v N ,+� N � N `r ArlinMan .5372 Esz m W 53641 Kii 53801537-0�� 5360 x'. ) .5366 536 Q 5358 W *++i( 53$9 EMI5354 . Emma �+ 5352 m f EZZIEM 5.5mini: �>�iii 53:2 O 5354 u'n) :+4' 21 n `47115 = O1 M u) cami 534 N N 1.21!43 N .c45 N ® 5340 ®474x2 LAMBERTE - ; _- `A ry N 55,334°8. . 436 - 5*MED 311111n LAMBERT AVE 533 7 ® Gh � MIN O.:f..b O .. I � 533.. �� 5324 N N NIN 'N. O p 6s NN4 ® PARK N N .N N 5330 532 5330 532 5324 'r?�r\' ��5299/ ! a�OZ 5316 =��'O 531. Hr., � 5298 5301 53-,2 I I 5308► Oa 5308 530 U 5308+530 5 9; U�® m ^ n a I 0 553300081552390. 300 529• 5300 529 53001 Z N N•N N N NIN N .N I N1N N'N NININ 529. 0 T N 1 N ry 5 I I rEVIT 5290 ��9 R� H2. 5288 np N 1.4, '`) N N 5275 I 5267 CITY OF 1111VBS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDEgATION A Benda Section; 13. N STAF RFP RT AGENDAOReport Number: 95-1475WS SESSIONDATE_______________October 2, 1995 Report Date: 9-28-95 DISPOSITION Item Description: Continued Discussion of Upgrading of Mounds View Drive Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary_ pp ement sheets as necessary.) In April of this year, the Council was ofn April View Drive adjacent to the Mbun. s presented with Poi is for the u have improvedupgrade is new Silver lake Pointe Senior upgrade Throadwaya result of the desire of the Fire of access to theHousing an emergency. Duringback (north) side of the complex Department to event of the rge 'cyt the course of Plei hn the developero make the project, it was agreed that negotiations with necessary roadwaythe Citythe improvements. would use TIF money tIn April, the examine Council asked Staff to improvements Departments' meet again with o of the roadway. needs as they related the Fire Chief the mp the Chief Nile Zi to access andevent of fire reiterated evacuation,n of the Fire mound met with asaid that dit and be imperative. Department, last week access to the North side of the buildingin the In would estimate April,fo i the or of Public Works Mike gutter, theo total cost ct. With an improveddriving and I developed a cost would be between driving surface and curb and $9, 000 and $10, 000. ,! / P. 1 Harrington, Comm Pity Development Coordinator ..� .� N 6016 6015 8025 8018 I • 8005 f 8000 8005 801- 8009 8006 6011 800080.2.1 ��2 801 ��= 7985 8004 7981 ! 7990 p 7981 6000 a001 ate" Om A _I 9aq^ 797$ 7970 iimmiimeg79 7980 ;mon89 �� Z®� 7�: a Y n N 0 •n ., 7965 I 7960 7960 7979 7980 79� Y: N n 7955 I 7956 it_•_U 7989MEM 7961 m N 795 7933 7950 7940 7927 I i1 a _in 7930cam 7930 7917 �� t hi n a Wn o, �� '�cc1 ,� N N e^v 7900 7901 7900 ry n N 7900 79014,4 — 7900 7901 . 7890 Ihi N HILLVIEW N N - "7825 7geo ; m ROAD 7815 7870 7865 0 N Nir lecommuue 860 7850ai . 7flU!; 7 '0 7821 Z 7869 i. 7858 + in m I i I' ® 7870 N 7851 7860 7865 N N 8•' ">6, ®� 7 ..•,.. 783• •�1:Ell oI•j�)♦�8 Xp 7841 850 7855 1 7830 �;_.� �_0 1•1 ` cliar2 OQ 7840 7835 ibehe -� 7750 ` 4,.....,.4... moat 7615 —�� 7805 77s9�mo , . 7a� i ENNElt IMIImaw G91; r251... 1.1) 4., 1 _W 7751 Acr 7767 7760 a774 7601 ti 7761 .6 _� ce� , • % 77so 7731 Q 7755 7730 77 _ �� ® - ♦ 21 k 'w;i?:' y'c,' ® 7710 7711::: :.:::=.-:::::-.;;.: �-��� 77.• 7710 • m A._ N ® 76851 my le intii r� . � N 7660 � 7 if 670 a 2585 n giro H . •.10: 7670 76® . W 11)- „... N NNNN H NN 7660EME _ I 7.•e. ® �, • N Eni®., emmm ®W 761 7620 7625 7620 N fr I blif .. 762 760 7600 7619 7600 7601 O ti y� \ = 7585 RIM SILVER VIEW„ ,........____152.1 ,,, ,.. r. ,,,,.: Q D 7565 7570 PARI( °N �''• •Gy 7546 E21.1......•3 7560 ° �� • O 7545 �++� N za H 7538 W® Z 7560 Q .� o� °� h X42 Lx b 1A H y N N O y Y 7515a to N°N � .r �o� i[]O750 7500 I m IN DRN�n�TI •52� (i: ; N#`C4 —y0.- N D'•C fp ,5f,... N N Nlf N • O.p i 7474 ran •f E N O.O ° .� O tO O”N a 7490 a N y. ; ; N N I 7465 + + �l' m o °n 7462 7474 7471 1747 495 ry N m 750 N°+^o .3 N N G°e N p N 7454 3RONSON r ° ° N N o 7448N CO 7445 7451 7456 + m Inkc•• :.,. .• . N N N CO ,D 7452 N m� 7444 .:::•:::::...:: .... ......... / N�N V7 O uy 7430 741$ N 429 e4,1 / he, PI C :.. I- 4 X, n � u7 O 2 n n 740: 7405 I 7412in EX 7409 7440 PARKKVI OR re'd 7sos o7 c.?..� � Iso. 7380 7400 + 7350 N 7365 7360 =11 OM H4• 3.. st®a. 7390 u-••�� - _ 73...4. 34. 217I: ' 7373 7350ezdtigagir_ n N `�° ^ n N I fr/4. rnowEgzi pi• •T® N 'SN.II°/_1d1.t �1l1 M N p ^+ u'l n rn CO m `D NI a rn 730 ^ c 7338 73.. = e N N N N �,+,�,�,� ittrime, c0 GO °' r �:'!:•t n 1 n 7310 . 730 ^ h ^ N �i RD � � r h ry • � N N H ry N I N N T N C '0414 N + 2 N N N a0 m o1 I + N N N N 2:: ^ N N N N ME 527:5. 'D.p��n� wtocRac000 co 16mar NNNNN ry 28, .t 8 ^,� a _ a n _ I 52-• N ry N N 1 N N NIN N ^TA ^�T, I Q 517151 ''� LOUISA ACNE N N COW OF REQTJEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 14. P EW RT Report Number:95-1476TIS AGENDA SESSION DATE October 2, 1995 Report Date: DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion of Update Highway 10 Redevelopment p nt Activities Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. ry(attach supplement sheets as necessary.) alatiMARL The following is an update on several properties along Highway 10 that are being 2625 Hi hwa 10 Blue House near Hardees ; considered for redevelopment. I have offered the owner, John Hildreth, $125,000 in cash for thero ert , about the offer and has not given me an answer. I left a message on his machine today and will be requesting his answer by Friday. I should have more information for ou byp p y Mr. Hildreth wanted some time to think Y the work session. I spoke to Mike Denny of Griffin Realty, one of three of the developers I called rear property. Mike said that the property is ideal for a gas station but realizing that this would not may work for an office building but he would need to do further research regarding the best use for the leases prior to pursuing the project. He did say that a commercial use is definitely be our desire he said it would be to the City's the roe toct purchaseHeid the property, and as a developerhewaytwouldced and that it would developerst throughthformaladvrequest for qualifications.aroI am still waitingket all way ao proceed to s v r that it p p y, clear the site and market three lots to several Ryan Companies. for comments from Opus Corporation and IVacant Lots next to Blue House) At my request, Spring Lake Park Realty had an appraisal done on the propertywhich $80,000. (See letter attached). I am not sure if this was an internal appraisal or an official appraisal. Therefore, will be requesting a copy of the appraisal and hope to have somethingprior they said came back at p for to Monday evening. 2975 Hi hwa 10 Auto Central ; I wasnot able to reach the Mullins, owner of the property, prior to the packet. Hope Monday evening, to have more information prior to K-Gas Site: I spoke to the owner of the K-Gas Site to request that he remove the fence and consider This will allow for easier marketing of the site. He needs to discuss this with the general will get back to me. In addition, the EDA may want to consider purchasingoption demolishing the building. 9 al manaoperty rty the property and of the site. The asking price of the property is$175,000 but the owner would settle for$135 000. $135,000. Everest extension of Mounds View Business Park Everest currently owns two of the homes located on Highway 10 West of the Business Park South. Recently, Tim Nelson mailed a letter to each of the other three property owners conveying his willingness to negotiate the purchase of their property. Mr. Nelson will keep me informed on the negotiations and if unable to come to a satisfactory agreement may ask for City assistance to allow for the extension of Mounds View Business Park. Hiahwav 10 Redevelopment pian: As you know the Highway 10 Committee drafted some ideas for the redevelopment of Highway 10. The draft plan basically clusters properties along Highway 10 and makes suggestions for their use. This plan was conveyed to the EDC of which all agreed with the clustering and suggested uses but felt that the community was not ready to accept hiring consultants to review our recommendations and put together arofessiona Lynnnette Morgan has been-working-arra report to substantiatep I-redevelopment pFan.Therefore, internshi the importance of investing in redevelopment as an p project. We hope to have the report complete by the November work session for your review. Therefore, I felt it may be usefu Ito review the draft plan that was presented to the EDC by the Highway 10 Subcommittee. I will share these ideas with the EDA members at the work session. lajihai i1i,ieL Cath Be nnett, Economic Development Coordinator s Ada& P ® Q ���1������ / n[Arron ..,., 11000 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E. • BLAINE, MN 55434 612-754-1857 September 15, 1995 City ofMound iew Mounds 'ew, MN 55112 e have been asked by the owners of Lots 79& 80 Spring Lake Park Hillview addition to appraise said lots. They are currentlyzoned R4 and R3. We feel that the highest and best use would be co mmercial. The total footage of these lots are 57,200 square feet. Commercial properties in the area of these lots are currently selling for$3.00+A cigl foot. We feel that this property as zoned would be $1.40per market value of$80,000.00per square square foot or a fair Respectfully C------ --.- j%Z;12 oward C. Thorson Broker WY OF lilliREQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 15, ma �I�N REPORT �- AGENDA SESSION DATE-i Report Number: 95-14 7 7W$_ r t n 1,e 2 1 9 9 5 Report Date: _____9=22„..a5__ DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion of Business Improvement Loan to Forcia, Inc. Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report ARi4"*. - Comments attached. Ex. . .. 's•. _. . . ary(attach supplement she ecessary.) Mike Forcia, owner of Mister Donuts in Mounds View since 1990, approached the City to securing a low-interest loan for the interior and exterior improvement to the bakery. In'turn, aregards meeting was arranged with Mr. Forcia and Western Bank to discuss the project. Western Bank has approved participation in the loan and review of the application will bepresented at the EDC meeting this coming Thursday evening. I will have the EDC's recommendation provided to the EDA on Monday evening. p ded The applicant is requesting the maximum loan of$50,000. be $25,000 at 2% fixed interest for five years and Western Bank's participation partic(pation would be 11. 5 floating interest for five years. I have attached a copy of a letter from Western Bank ex plain n% structure and terms of the loan for your review. p g the The improvements include a conversion from Mister Donuts bakery to a new franchise called Donut Connection. Mister Donut was purchased by Dunkin Donuts a few years ago and many of the Mister Donut owners have converted to the Donut Connection franchise so that they can use the same brand of bakery products. The conversion includes new neon fascia and awnings, double faced poly sign, new exterior paint, new drive through intercom system, interior remodeling, expansion of product line to include sandwiches, soups, bagels, cakes and low-fat items and new equipment. This project clearly meets the goals of the program by enhancing the astetics of property along Highway 10 and improving the commercial tax base. Mr. Forcia will be at the meeting to give an overview of the plans for improvement for the new bakery in Mounds View. . ,sei...KL_..g.i__J.C1 Cathy Bennet/%nomic Development Coordinator EDC RESOLUTION NO. 95-EDC11 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SMALL BUSINESS LOAN TO FORCIA INC. WHEREAS, Forcia Inc, who has owned Mister Donut in Mounds View since 1990, has approached the City for a small business improvement loan, and WHEREAS, Forcia, Inc. is requesting the maximum loan of$50,000 for interior and exterior improvements and to increase product line at independently owned Mister Donut store located at 2394 Highway 10, and WHEREAS, Mounds View's Economic Development Authority would be responsible for $25,000 at 2% interest rate and Western Bank would be responsible for $25,000 at 11.25% floating interest rate for five years, and WHEREAS, Forcia Inc., has been approved by Western Bank contingent upon receiving references on existing mortgage and franchise loans, and WHEREAS, Forcia Inc.'s bakery is open 24 hours and currently serves donuts and pastries and will be expanding the product line to include soups, subs, sandwiches, bagels, ice cream and cakes as a direct result of their expansion; and WHEREAS, the improvements will allow Forcia Inc. to join the Mid-Atlantic Bakery Co-op and will change the store name to Donut Connection, and WHEREAS, the change will facilitate significant exterior and interior aesthetics improvements, new signage and equipment purchases, and WHEREAS, the Economic Development Commission believes that assisting Forcia Inc. will benefit the entire community of Mounds View by improving the aesthetics of the commercial sector in Mounds View thereby increasing the tax base. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Economic Development Commission hereby recommends approval of a $50,000 small business improvement loan which includes $25,000 Economic Development Authority participation and $25,000 Western Bank participation. Adopted by the Economic Development Commission of the City of Mounds View this 28th day of September, 1995. ATTEST: (SEAL) Chair Economic Development Coordinator zr.r Cb yb TUE 11 :51 P. 02 WESTERN BANK September 26, 1995 City of Mounds View Cathy Bennett Economic Development Coordinator 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 RE: Forcia, Inc. DBA Donut Connection Dear Cathy: Western Bank is please to offer Forcia, Inc. DBA Donut Connection financing as follows: Notes and Rates: $25,000.00 Western Bank at 11.25% fixed and $25,000.00 Western Bank/Participation to City of Mounds View at 2% fixed Terms: Both 5 year full amortization Fees: Origination fee $500.00, disbursement fee $250.00 (three advances maximum) Collateral: All Corporate assets. Currently Mister Donut of America, Inc. has a first lien. Western State Bank prefers to have a first lien which requires the subordination from Mr, Donut of America, Inc. If that is not attainable, Western State Bank will do a purchase money security interest UCC1 filing on assets purchased (first lien) and general UCC filing to secure a second lien position on the remaining corporate assets. Payments: Principal and interest monthly of approximately $550.00 and $440.00 respectively will be automatically deducted from a Western State Bank checking account. Guaranty: Michael A. Forcia and Donna M. Forcia Insurance: Business property insurance with Western State Bank listed as loss payee. University Avenue O(llce , McCarron s Cake Office Oakdale Office Mounds View Office 849 UniversilyAve,St Paul,MN 55104 1740 Ake St„Maplewood,MN 55113 M St (612)224.1871,/612)224-1575 FAX 15121487.2051 14119)487-7Rflgccy /117411.7 FF a�y9t4„N t aC 2711R"K Rn WA1n �c,ot)nn_v4n.cev wY.l0,Mounds view,MN"112 wci cu QQ tut 11 ;bC P. 03 Deposit Account: The business operating account must be at Western State Bank. Subordinations: Richard and Effie Martin must sign subordinations on notes for $17,800 and $45,393 allowing scheduled principal and interest payments. Western State Bank requires a copy of each note. Documentation: Copy of the Articles of Incorporation and Assumed Name Certificates. References: Western State Bank is still waiting for references on the mortgage and franchise loans. Various other terms and conditions are part of the actual loan documents which will be gone over at the loan closing. In the event that there is any material adverse chance in the financial condition or obligations of Forcia, Inc. DBA Donut Connection prior to the closing, the bank may at its sole and complete discretion, terminate this commitment. Thank you for allowing Western State Bank to help meet the financial needs of Forcia, Inc. DBA Donut Connection. If you have any questions, call me at 290-8150. Sincerely, 7"per / ,00: ark H. Luhmann Vice President vii, 0 0 APPLICATION FOR BUSINESS LOAN PROGRAM MOUNDS VIEW NAME OF BUSINESS ' 1 A r ' - AU L�.5- :` hi, ADDRESS .. __4' I it/1 ; j /, NUMBER OF YEARS LOCATED IN MOUNDS VIEW - / /� TELEPHONE NUMBER lie _________: . /..Z_ FAX NU1�ER WT DESCRIPTION OF BUS SS L� A, e- dc 777777:77: :I':`/Ai .4..4. ititriam)6i MrArRarargri ' Ai OWNERS NA1rz(S) c S} /. y. /1' ', miiiiiii, lir I.WHIraillo _ ' Mill i miiimmiummi i 1.11111111111mmillM ,4 MIIIIIIIIIIIIII a • EXHIBITS: -"" -------------------- ->‹_-. 3 YEARS FISCAL YEAR END FINANCIAL MOST RECENT INTERIM FINANCIAL TS TS ik PERSONAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT BIDS OR CONTRACTS TO SUPPORT COSTS PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 BUSINESS PLAN FOR: FORCIA, INC. d.b.a. Mister Donut AUGUST 15, 1995 Contacts: Mike or Donna Forcia 2394 Hwy. 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Ph# 786-7912 August 15, 1995 Michael and Donna Forcia MISTER DONUT 2394 Hwy 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 GOAL Forcia Inc. intends to convert their Mister Donut location into a Donut Connection In order to adequately accomplish a successful conversion it is necessary for Forcia Inc. to acquire a loan for approximately $50,000.00 at the best available interest rate. EXHIBITS - Business Plan - Cost of Project (estimate) - 3 year financial statements -most recent financial statement - Personal financial statement CONCLUSION Given the past credit history and recent financial statements, the ability of Forcia Inc. to pay all debts appears to be excellent. The Mister Donut in Mounds View was built in 1983. The shop was owned and unsuccessfully operated by Mr. Glen Marsh and it closed in 1985. Having plenty of work experience though n business experience, we purchased the franchise from Mr. Marsh with a$45,000 home mortgage loan from Donna's parents, Richard and Effie Martin.) On September 20, 1995 we signed a sub-lease with Mr. Marsh. The terms being$1,650.00 per month or 10% of gross sales. In addition, the lease included payment of real estate taxes and assessments to Scottland Inc. each month. In October 1987 we were served with a 7 day eviction notice. Mr. Marsh had gone bankrupt. With the advise of a lawyer we chose to take the risk to make the store profitable even though the cost of operations would be much higher. We signed a lease with Scottland Inc. on April 29, 1987. The terms being$3,333.00 per month plus real estate taxes and assessments. Given the increase in rent, we fell rapidly behind in all areas. By 1989 we had become $26,370.00 behind in our lease obligation to Scottland Inc. We received notice on September 1, 1989 that Scottland Inc. was willing to accept an immediate payment of$10,000.00 to satisfy the debt. Also, Scottland amended the lease to reduce the rent to $3,000.00 per month and deleted from the lease our obligation to pay real estate taxes and assessments. The restructured lease was signed on October 1, 1989. (The$10,000.00 came from a loan from Donna's Parents the Martins) In January 1990, J. Brooks Hauser(Scottland Inc.) also went bankrupt and the property was secured by Midwest Federal Savings and Loan. When Midwest went insolvent, the property was under a number of management companies for the Resolution Trust Corporation(RTC). The RTC put the property on the market for$210,000.00 Though we tried many institutions, we were unable to secure financing to purchase the property. We contacted Senator Paul Wellstone's office at the recommendation of a valued customer. With the help of his staff we were able to obtain financing through the First National Bank of Amarillo, TX. (Again we receive financial help from the Martins, $30,000) During the period we purchased the property, Mister Donut of America had sold its interest to Dunkin Donuts. Initially we opted to join Dunkin until Mister Donut franchisees formed the Mid-Alanta Bakery Co-op (Now called Donut Connection). In the part our actions were to stay afloat at the expense of building maintenance, equipment, new products, hiring of additional employee and community involvement. Now that we are current in all areas, it is time for us to focus on the future and beyond. Donut Connection, in our opinion, is the turning point for Forcia Inc. With Donut Connection we_will h?vP_the_advantages-o f ise without the high costs of franchising. In addition to the non-existing franchise fees, we will immediately see an approximate 5-6% savings in our food costs. We will have an unlimited and unrestricted product line with many new local suppliers formally unapproved by Mister Donut. We will expand our regular bakery items to include refrigerated items such as cream puffs, eclairs, filled horns, etc. We would also expand our cake decorating abilities adding cakes available for every day purchasing as well as for special occasions and wedding cakes. Adding a fat-free product line as well as cappuccino and flavored coffees will add more choices making it easier to satisfy a larger variety of people. In addition, a new increased menu line consisting of products such as soups, subs, bagel sandwiches, croissant sandwiches and ice cream will increase sales during the afternoon, evening and late night hours. With an expanded menu, round the clock hours and the convenience of our drive thru, we will serve the community with a fresh, quality product anytime day or night. With Donut Connection, we look forward to seeing what advertising strategies lie ahead. Having been voted as the most outstanding new advertising logo for 1995, we feel we are off to a great start. The corporate marketing manual contains all the advertising material needed to make the grand-opening a huge success in bringing us all together to be acknowledged as a new franchise. Over 100 previously operated Mister Donut stores have successfully converted. As well as advertising on our own, we plan on group advertising with the other Donut Connection locations in the metro area. Newspaper,phone book and maybe even television is being considered. Our road to this point has been long and hard. With hard work and long hours we have been able to survive. We feel converting to Donut Connection is the turning point for Forcia Inc. and also feel remodeling is the key component to our success. Summary Sign Building Awning Installed $11,328.00 (Attracta Sign) Neon Installed $1,125.00 Double Faced Poly Sign $2,590.00 2 x 10 Drive Thru $896.00 Installation $660.00 Total $16,599.00 Drive Thru System InterCom $1,328.00 (3M Sound System) Head Set $2,262.00 Door Alert $156.00 3M Music $150.00 Total $3,896.00 Construction (Classic Woodwork) Total $3,800.00 Equipment Price List Total $19,320.00 Visual Improvements Price List Total $8,425.00 Total ($52,040.00) • Page No. of Pages PROPOSAL/SALES AGREEMENT ATTRIKTA 7420 W.LAKE ST. • MI 1GN MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55426 • (6127 933-7730 ' FAX(612)933-7883 COMPANY MR DONUT!MOUNDSVIEW PHONE DATE STREET 784-6863 7!17/95 2394 OLD HWY 10 JOB NAME CITY,STATE AND ZIP CODE DONUT CONNECTION JOB LOCATION MOUNDSVIEW MN BUYER SAME CONSULTANT • NA AE HANSON JOB PHONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: MANUFACTURE AND INSTALL ILLUMINATED AWNING PER ATTACHED SKETCHES. FABRIC:STARLITE BURGANDY OR TEAL ON TOP.WHITE WITH RASBERRY OR TEAL STRIPPING AND COPY ON BOTTOM SECTION:TOTAL LENGTH 96 FT. 27'ON EAST SIDE,44'ON NORTH SIDE,25'ON WEST SIDE. TOTAL HEIGHT 5'TOTAL PROJECTION 24" WITH EGGCRATE BOTTOM. DOUBLE LAMP U.L.APPROVED FLUORESCENT FIXTURES WITH COLD WEATHER BALLASTS.MOUNTED TO THE FRAME AND INSTALLED TH THE POINT OF ELECTRICAL HOOK-UP. FRAME CONSTRUCTION:GAL.WELDED SQUARE METAL TUBING. • •)'-C CA“.'-‘4 TOTAL COST ON AWNING INSTALLED TO THE POINT OF ELECTRICAL HOOK-UP $11,328.00 �/� ACCENT TEAL NEON ON BOTH SIDES OF BLDG. 45FT.TOTAL 5-76 fit- G,ES , $1125.00 INSTALLED. DOUBLE FACE 8'X10'MR.DONUT FACES ON PYLON SIGN. NEW FACE WITH GRAPHICS $2590.00 /WASH OLD FACES$2240.00/ 2'X10'DRIVE THRU PAN FACES NEW WITH GRAPHICS $898.00 5'X18"FLAT FACE SIGN IN BACK $105.00 INSTALLATION OF PYLON AND OTHER SIGNS....$860.00 /4 PERMIT:COST OF SIGN PERMITS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS QUOTE...SIGN PERMITS WILL BE OBTAINED BY ATTRACTA. TERMS:1/3 DOWN 1/3 UPON INSTALLATION BALANCE NET 30 DAYS FROM INSTALLATION. We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor-complete in accordance with above specifications,for the sum of: Payment to be made as follows: dollars($ All material is guaranteed to be as specified.All work to be completed In a substan .4111 - tial workmanlike manner according to specifications submitted per standard prac- Authorize tices.Any alteration or deviation from above specifications Involving extra costs will Signatur /� be executed only upon written orders,and will become an extra charge over and • above the estimate.All agreements contingent upon strikes,accidents or delays Note:This beyond our control.Owner to carry fire,tornado and other necessary insurance.Ournoproposal accepted within proposal may be withdrawn by us if no workers are fully covered by Workman's Compensation Insurance. days. Acceptance of Proposal - The above prices, specifications and conditions(SEE EVERSE SIDE)are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature Date of Acceptance: Signature id Of rig gw ,...,,.,4. : ..7 , ‹z at- f '1 ' i? Y —!--' I , p, ,,.. i ! 18; . 4!. iz! ' -4 12 10 1 '''3'.1 • . 1 ICI' .j:`•:•1. ' i,,,,i 41 3 • . !5 I r---- I I I 'UI .,1 . -------j ...... A I \-- ' , •i • .!; .e • el ' If • I I liii 1 r 1 to, 1 I - -T..,.....:,...t.--....,..tri -7--------,: -.-- ,r.ci i:. 1 , •2,..!! , ._,.. .....:;,z.--;,;q---,,,-;:',•.i I „ ' ........-.:..,•,•: .. • .r4, . I le' I r•=I--'-'"--rP-f;: t.•:-: , i := ' • ''::- i Fi'l ___--;,;.....,:z.„--...-..;z7-. .k i ; .-:: ,,,,,,,,i-,-..., • 1:-; : i awft 1 z , I rs i I I ell I ..=._--- i 0 0 z ti.:7 ru.r+rr :'''i Poi I , giti f:,= CT- .1 ...: I L—_---, 0-.I "N„ ,.., '.::, i- if I Il 0 : I It t;''. — '- . ii ' lill 7 .. ,. .: . .1. 1. Au:•_------- • 1 al;.. b _ , Ei t p I 1 i _ . ,:._. ... • a 6.1 -. Aa— ..-. -.I : • r- . I 0= ,-;,•, 51... , , • 1 1 2 t •,,,,%.,e..1..---.%•iii f _______._____ - i ______...fi e, :—. Igi t-I 1 I ----7–__ I ::: e. 1 = .......x:..:-- 15? 1 t., I , - ....... mr 1 I = Evi - izi I° 1 71,17: --.: : 11 1 q I D Vgx,..-4..,.• 1 i zi i in 1 0 • :,,,E .1 0 ,.. – IN ; :74-,L.,,.. ----- :7! I b 11F.! Z III i pi gi r .... 1_- !, ,..,' I ..41,E u?..;:li.',4 !!!1 ' --. —,— 17,--,,,,foii7r-4__Ni.-:,:i i. 1 , e mg_ ,.:, , ; , Dt itzill.... . it; 1, . ,0— •,;_-.4"..--,-,:.::"...7.1,v iti;, LI; 1 ' 3 E fra„.,,iii,E,,,,, ri 0, I t: -ev-E-- .,...!-. Li E I IzI 1 i .,__ 11 ,coi a t I 1 vet itivio .' 1 s 1 1 1 I I . I 1 I 1..1— 12.‘NLS i'-',-1,El , t .-.-- 1 I '--- irt-ii:. ::d'ie, , 1 _i_ , kr 1 1 I I- OZI--- ' 4 ' 1 , i I 1 1 - , I , t--1-5----i C \ • .-- ... .1 ---- ......11.1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Kim...... tall: losi _.401110 A ..1 •- i i b --i— i Ea ,: I _ I I ' -'I-— :::,•77....-,... ..•-•••-• -- i . , .. _ :.:::::•rri i —____ati..- ---u: 1.4' • - • - i, =-- • - ..,.,z•. . Pm° ,., II! t I I 111.11 1r _______11- 1-• .....___ii.41 a 2 -z---14gg !! 15' - .._ 1 :I IR g z _____. z'4 , . ____7=1!7;vh4—.., iiii:?1,:,/,/,'1,1 . ,.4,./111:1,,_1, ::::E. i.r.. 7.71...!,..jr,'":;:.":,:."::::,'"..11.:...:::i.:7:::!i:' !,`.°... , 0 0 INX< I.Rii Y31 I IQ I V'I a' t"--: I 1- 1 1 I 2 2 . 0 I Vfl..........WleneM:1';:•5 I I I ' I - i ..... , ....: 1 Nrl I 0 I 0 , Iozi \ --L.- I \ ----,__- ;i N LE-gg 5 'N- I - '- la, --- :,: !u/• , .- . •- I I ---...,....\ \\ , 11141 1 . _.1., _ - ; _.. • I _I - I ri I ....__._,...,, I i_ :: _ ,g 1 :,-... ----- 4 .I I. 1 : co i:.- -2 -•,.:0::-,:.-,: ;4 1 -- =i-• ---,-;,,,:aL,11 -;.::.. 'i--; I:I : Z C-- ..777.7-•,..:•.L`'...A.'.-'-'1:-; I C'`Z :-----,..''''- ''.••" mi.,' i'• ,w, _ Of-- .:,..i..,:-puio. ,.:•;. ,•••I "'Az' In ----. ill ig! 1 - ci ';.:._.,-•''..7.•!g.,...,--:,-,: -' IL.; i - 1-- •.-...-.7:::: :-.•:9! ..41 :-- ----.- 1 r_Thantorarft IV 1 i •___„„,_.... ......_ , , •____,-----H,..,„,„.„.„,-- ..,„- . I I I - 11,._ '....=:, iri 1 i ...-_,-__ __"..r.,...'•: :.r.•:;•-•" .:i''.'•-7!' ' :MI Z 17_ • 7.!.; ; - 01- .__ 10! ' ... _-__-... . M %z.1 II:---___-_-_---7,,....,:::.,,,44,,.,:-...7.---: ; 1 1 10! :. e;;-- 4, i It •____ -.......,....„_.,..: w , _ co,...... , I :"1; 47.I - Z I:= .*Vj ! , 1 , - N I- 1 i 2 :--- '.:',::::'" "-'-- •..; , ,,I ' - 4, - a z ' "":rn.------ :...: ;t; I : co i:: g:H: .,L' IgI R 77,!::.ii ,Q)/ I - g,-- ----:, *., i izi - ,-- - • ---ii : , i 6, 1 i , I:17 1 g -----1 • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMIIIIMIMmmmmm.—___ 41/12102r Affigir SOUND PRODUCTS, INC. •11485 VALLEY VIEW ROAD,EDEN PRAIRIE,MN 55344(612)944-2930 FAX(612)944-5077. AUTHORIZED DEALER July 26, 1995 Mr. Mike Forcia Mounds View Mister Donut 2394 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Forcia, Enclosed you will find proposals for the following 3M systems: • 3M D-15 Drive Thru Intercom -Hard Wired • 3M Model 760 Wireless Headset Intercom • Door Alert Chime System • 3M Satellite Music System Literature is enclosed that will give specific details and system specifications. I will contact you shortly to follow up on this proposal. Please call our office at (612) 944-2930 we can be of assistance. We Iook forward to hearing from you! Sin ely, v - 1 Gary Su n System onsultant Sound Products. Inc. - 3M Dealer 11485 Valley View Road,.Eden Prairie, MN 5» <i4S stem Pro •OSaI phone: (612) 944_2930/fax: (612) 944-5077 Date: 7/26/95 Installation Address: Mounds View Mister Donut Bill to Address: 2394 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55432 (same) Mr. Mike Forcia (612) 786-7912/(612) 784.6863 We are pleased to submit the following cost estimate: Job Description: Sale and installation of 3M D-15 Drive Thru Intracom s stem. Replaces existin• drive thru. MATERIALS QUANTITY 1 I3M D-15 Intracom DESCRIPTION PRICE I TOTAL 1 13M Deluxe Speaker/Mic Menu Board) 1 (Drive-thru Cable, S.eaker/Mic/L000 Detector 1 Pedestal Mount optional I I I I f I 1 I otal Materials Cost I $919.00 $919.00 1 Minnesota Sales Tax $59.74 $59.74 LABOR Materials total $978.74 QUANTITY 1 Ilnstallation labor DESCRIPTION CHARGES TOTAL $350.00 I 5350.00 � I Order Acce taao Labor $350.00 Total estimate 61,328.74 i f X Name Deposit(25%)ingmagia Balance Due $996.55 Title Dare LL._s_ System Consultant 7/26195 Senna r.. cts,Inc P" i Date • Sound Products, Inc. - 3M Dealer 11485 Valley View Road, Eden Prairie, S stem Pro•osal phone: (612) 944.-2930/fax: (612) 944-5077 Date: 7/26/95 Installation Address: Mounds View Mister Donut Bill to Address: 2394 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55432 (same) Mr. Mike Forcia (612) 786-7912/(612) 784-6863 We are pleased to submit the following cost estimate: Job Description: Sale and installation of 3M Model 760 wireless headset drive thru s stem. MATERIALS QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION 1 IModel 760 Sin•ie Headset Intercom S stem -includes 1 headset, $RICE I TOTAL 11 batte , base station, •sinter su•pl , and char•er. I $1.965.00 I $1,995 00 1 IBatte 1 Ilnterconnect Module $60.00 $60.00 ' $116.00 $116.00 Optional: Additional headset su•plied for$800.00 111111111111111111111111111111.1 1 Minnesota Sales Tax $141.121 $141.12 LABOR Materials total $2,312.12 QUANTITY DESCRIPTION 1 Installation labor I CHARGES TOTAL 111 I $350.00 $350.00 1111111111111111111111....................11111.111111111111111111111111111111 I1111111111111111111111111111.01 Orde_ r gQtance Labor total $350.001 Total estimate $2,662.12 ,/ Deposit(25%) $665.53 X Balance Due $1,996.59 Name m // AI Date • La . \ sodnd Ptoeucs.i . '-System Consultant 7/26/85 Date Sound Products, Inc. - 3M Dealer 11485 Valley View Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344S stem Pro•osal phone: (612) 944-2930/fax: (612) 944-5077 Date: 7/26/95 Installation Address: Mounds View Mister Donut Bill to Address: 2394 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55432 (same) Mr. Mike Forcia (612) 786-7912/(612) 784.6863 We are pleased to submit the following cost estimate: Job Description: Sale and installation of Door Alert Chime S stem-replaces existin• s stem. MA TER1ALS QUANTITY DESCRIPTION 1 (Power Su••I PRICE TOTAL 1 (Electric Chime I I 1 (Shadow Switch11111111111111111111 1 'Door Contact Switch I I 1 iremould Box All Cable, as needed I I imminimm 11111111111111111...... 1 (Total E•ui•ment Cost 11111111111$11111111111111.1111) 1 Minnesota Sales Tax $4.23 $4.23 LABOR Materials totals $69.231 QUANTITY DESCRIPTION 1 'Installation labor CHARGES TOTAL $87.00 I $87.00 � I Orde�Acc�ptance Labortotal $87.00 timate $156.23 DepositTotales(25%) $39.06 X Balance Due S117.17 Name Title IT (<��� � , Date Sp(nd Preaucts,Inc. • -S stem Consultant 75 5 Date Avi' MUST C SERVICE AGREEMENT SOUND PRODUCTS,INC. 11485 Valley View Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 • AUTHORIZED DEALER 612-944-2930• FAX 612-944-5077 Install at: Mounds View Mister Donut Bill to: ( am • (PREMISES) SUBSCR Address: 2394 Highway 10 ( IBER) Address: cVloundsview State MN Zip Code55432 City Contact: Mike F o r c•; a Phone:7 R 6-7Q1 7 Contact: State Zip Code Phone: 1. Sound Products, Inc. (COMPANY) agrees to provide the above Subscriber with its functional music service program, referred to hereinafter as the PROGRAM, as the same may be revised and supplemented from time to time, and the equipment, maintenance and other services as hereinafter specified. 2. COMPANY Shall-pFC the_PR , equipment and maintenance for: 3M DBS X 3M DBS via Microwave Other Ambiance X FM Lite Class Act Top of the Charts Country Tape Other Includes amplifier and 3 speakers . All music licensin_ for this broadcast is included. All such equipment and any additions or replacements thereto, whether or not affixed to the PREMISES, shall remain the sole and absolute personal property of COMPANY, and shall not be removed from PREMISES without the prior written consent of COMPANY. 3. SUBSCRIBER shall pay COMPANY: ONE TIME charges: A Periodic RECURRING charge of: Opening Tape Library Fee 47. 93 Installation 150.00 per mo Equipment Tax TOTAL 150.00 V 4. This AGREEMENT is subject to the Terms and Conditions on the reverse side hereof and shall become bindin on the parties when signed by SUBSCRIBER and accepted and approved by the COMPANY. g COMMENCEMENT DATE: Upon Installation SOUND PROD ;TS, INC. / SUBS R BER: Accepted by: BY: a Name: Salesi epartment (please print or type) Approved: / By: f/ Signature General Manager rte: Date: ©Copyright P."ISA893 i White-Original;Yellow-File; Pink-Customer MUSIC SERVICE AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS This SERVICE AGREEMENT contains all terms agreed upon by the parties and supersedes all prior agreements or representations, oral or written. This SERVICE AGREEMENT shall be binding upon the parties when signed by Purchaser and accepted and approved by Sound Products, Inc. PAYMENT The total amount due Sound Products, Inc., including charges for all service calls not within Sound Products, Inc. limited warranty, shall be paid by Purchaser within ten (10) days after date of invoice. Sound Products, Inc. reserves the right to require progress payments. Any changes from Equipment and Installation cosspecified in the SERVICE AGREEMENT involving any extra costs will result in additional cost to Purchaser. The of a�ny'bbonds required will be an additional charge to the Purchaser Sound-Products Ine shall-have-the sole 1d any increase be more than 10%, then Subscriber shall have the right to approve of such increase. TITLE AND SECURITY. Title to and risk of loss of all Equipment shall pass to Purchaser on the date of delive of Equipment to the Premises. Sound Products, Inc. reserves a purchase money security interest in ry Equipment until payment in full of total charges. Purchaser agrees to execute all necessary documents and to provide proof of insurance if required by Sound Products, Inc. to perfect such security interest. INSTALLATION. If specified on the reverse side hereof, Sound Products, Inc. will install Equipment at the Premises. All required electrical conduit, adequate AC power, suitable space for installation of Equipment shall be provided by, and shall be the sole responsibility of Purchaser. Sound Products, Inc.'s Installation Charge is based upon work performed during regular business hours. If Purchaser requests installation during other than regular business hours, Purchaser shall pay Sound Products, Inc.'s prevailing overtime billing rate. Installation Charges do not include parts or labor for metal enclosures, conduit, teflon wiring, buried cables, or elevator. traveling cables. LIMITED WARRANTY. Sound Products, Inc. warrants this Equipment against any defects in material and workmanship, under normal use, for a period of six months from date of purchase. In the event this product is found to be defective within the warranty period, Sounds Products, Inc.'s only obligation and your exclusive remedy, shall be the replacement of any defective parts. It is expressly understood that Sound Products, Inc. shall have no obligation to furnish labor nor bear the expense of shipping defective products for repair. This warranty shall not apply if Sound Products, Inc. determines that the defect was caused by improper use of installation. Sound Products, Inc. shall not, under any circumstances, be liable for direct, special or consequential damages, such as, but not limited to, damage or loss of other property or equipment, loss of profits or revenue, cost and capital, cost of purchased or replacement goods, or expense or inconvenience caused by service interruptions. The remedies set forth herein are exclusive. This AGREEMENT shall commence as of the date provided on the reverse side, or as of the billing date for the initial monthly PROGRAM charge, whichever date is later and shall remain in full force and effect for an initial term of sixty (60) months. This AGREEMENT shall be automatically renewed thereafter for successive sixty month terms unless either party elects to terminate this AGREEMENT byent (the other party by certified mail at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiratioof the'initial Corr any nosubseq subsequent term. GENERAL. This AGREEMENT is not assignable without the prior written consent of Sound Products, Inc. and can be modified only by a written agreement duly signed on behalf of Sound Products, Inc. Any variance from the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT any order, form or other written notification from Purchaser will be of no effect. If Purchaser fails to pay any amounts due hereunder, Sound Purchaser, may pursue all remedies available under law including the repossession of Equipment. Pu cthasto err agrees to pay all costs and expenses of collection and/or repossession, including all attorneys fees incurred up to the maximum permitted by applicable law. If any provision of the AGREEMENT shall be held to be invalid illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in anywa be affected or irnpaired thereby. y t C L A,SS i C CO03 b / S Soy-3 /223 113 Ave ._i°cc,) - Coot.) K tlls ,�,l ,. s4/3-3 I / �� z- >>2- c s3 PROPOSAL • 4c.1 i 19_,2„5--- �i C./6 [ J frO.f2Cla Dear Sir: The undersigned proposes to furnish all materials and perform_all_labor_nnesessar=—to_complete following: e2- - P1,4 S 7'I l', is F>t/ i t.S4fr✓ -59,6r4),v I C o ,. . c ', II 41061111111MMIIIIIIMILZ 3 r .r .. s �i ' I ,NI LA-5 t`1 C. Lc4(1'I/��4-i-4-r o'v�P�'4ei-. / „v-. II L iv>t41/ion iJA r �lT (.V A11 ���V�� f—'lJCl /�C L //1I1 l---e� 1_ i 4-Q.1/PC 1 rall ' - A . k 7 • - .- .. c,.L'-jr ' - '--.. —, • di A)' a A 4 t ' .4-7 -: 1:" o 11 84 %." • li II II il . -' ,J n pCtic-,>= is�,-f-L R �)A-/Yi� 0Z-A T1 &V w R < <i ' i. 'II i'Li fjA Ii �� ij y� _ II All of the above work to be completed in a substantial and workmanlike manner for the sum of %/9�L-� 77?nr7Sd,.10 C/ f Nvti; .rr-� )1a I c$ 3, s'dc -c-C ) Dollars J Payments to be mae each y bp 0,s as the work progresses to the value of l (./.0.41%) per cent of all work completed. The entire amount of contract to be paid within / days 0completion. upon II Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications involving extra cost of material or labor will only be executed written orders for same, and will become an extra charge over the sum mentioned in this contract. All agreements I 11 I must be made in writing. II The Contractor agrees to carry Workmen's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance, also to pay all Sales Taxes, Old Age Benefit and Unemployment Compensation Taxes upon the material and labor furnished under this contract, as I I; required by the United States Government and the State in which this work is 1 I' performed. II Respectfully submitted, il a-4i7-11 c„X•ersj 1(_,./. A r a ./W_ .) Contractor l r ACCEPTANCE IIl You are hereby authorized to furnish all materials and labor required to complete the work mentioned in the above IIproposal, for which the undersigned agrees to pay the amount mentioned in said proposal, and according to the terms thereof. I Date 19 Form 147 MMD./141u.s. II Equitiment i t Wet Case $5,000.00 Dry Case $3,000.00 Sandwich Case Dishwasher $1,500.00 Soup Warmer $2,700.00 Conveyor Toaster $300.00 Microwave 5700.00 Bread Pans (12) $300.00 Ice Cream Machine 5420.00 Airbrush (Cakes) $3,000.00 Commercial Vacuum $700.00 Carpet Sweeper $300.00 Trash Receptacle $40.00 Coat Rack $300.00 News Paper Rack $100.00 Air Pots (4) $50.00 Glass Mugs (6doz) $$60.00 Serving Trays (4doz) $60.00 Condiment Rack $50.00 Napkin Holder(3) $110.00 Straw Holder(2) 5150.00 Misc. ( Spoons, Ladles, ect. $100.00 ) 5200.00 Total $19,320.00 VI TTA T TMPRO'VF1yENTS Wafl Beneh Chairs (4) $1,625.00 Tables (9) $900.00 New Ceiling $700.00 Ceiling Fans (3) $400.00 Curtains,Blinds $300.00 Wall Coverings 1,500.00 Carpet $1,000.00 $2,000.00 Total $8,425.00 I Cab OF 1111VREQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 16. S ST FF REPORT Report Number: 5_, 47Rric AGENDA SESSION DATE October 2, 1995 Report Date: O_28 95 DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion of Banners along Highway 10 Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report t - Comments attached. Ex•lanation/Summar_y_(attaeh_supplemeat sheets as ecessary.) UMMAR1% Last Thursday I received word that MnDot denied our application for a variance to install banners on the light poles at the intersections on Highway 10. The variance was needed because MnDot does not allow banners on State Highways with a speed limit greater than 40 MPH. Highway 10's speed limit is only 10 MPH over their threshold. The only reason the request for a variance was denied was that the banners would be a distraction from the signal lights. Jerry Linke has contacted Sen. Novak to appeal on our behalf for the variance. In addition, I have invited Bruce Hall, Traffic Supervisor, and his boss to the meeting to discuss an appeal for the variance. Attached is the application, letter and a copy of MnDot's guidelines for use of right-of-way for special events. Cathy Be ett, Economic Development Coordinator frax: (612) 784-3462 IVA• w CATHERINE CAPONE BENNETT o`e'pjr•Parcne s\`‘vs Economic Development Coordinator Phone: (612) 784-3055 Fax: (612) 784-3462 reeveletl 2401 Highway 10•Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 September 9, 1995 Mr. Bruce Hall Traffic Control Supervisor Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan_District—oakdie-G e 3485 Hadley Ave.,No. Oakdale,MN 55128 Dear Bruce: Attached is the completed application for a permit to install City Banners on State Highway 10 in Mounds View. I understand that the City will need to be granted a variance for the installation of these banners from MnDot. Therefore,this letter serves as our request to be .-ximsidered at your next meeting for approval. The City of Mounds View has been strugaiing with their identity for some time. Highway 10 is considered as the City Center for Mounds View since retail services and neighborhood facilities are located in this area. As a result,in 1994 a task force was commissioned to make recommendations to increase the positive awareness of the City to businesses,residents and the commuters along Highway 10. One of the recommendations included in the Mounds View Marketing Program was the installation of Welcome to Mounds View banners. The goal of the banners is to inform travelers that they are in the main area of the City of Mounds View and to create a positive community feeling that is so important to residents and businesses alike. I have included a copy of the Marketing Program for your review. The City Council has approved the purchase of 25 banners with existing marketing funds and a grant from Northern States Power. Ten of these banners are proposed for locations on State Highway 10. The purchase and installation of the banners is contingent upon approval from MnDot. The following is an overview of the banners and their locations on State Highway 10. Size: Ten 30'x 80'Banners Color: Royal Blue background with Green Tree Design and White Lettering to read "Pride, Progress and Partnership City of Mounds View" (sample attached) MINTED WITH iNKI. 2401 Highway 10 • Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 r� 100%recycled Paper Equal Opportunity Employer Locations: Banners to be installed on the Light Poles at the North and South sides at the following intersections: Highway 10 \Woodale Highway 10 \County Road H2 Highway 10 \Long Lake Road Highway 10 \County Road I Highway 10 \Silver Lake Road Material: * High Quality Vinyl made of Sunbrella Material with a 6 Season Warranty against defects. * 80 Series Banner Bracket System for installation which includes Stainless Steel B trap erglass-ares-thatflex-to educe wind load,no-rust aluminum rackets, cantilevered arms designed to hold banner taunt and easily removable arms with 1 pin each. Installation: Mounds View Public Works and Blaine/MV/SLP Fire Department The City of Mounds View is very excited about this project and is happy to have MnDot as a cooperative partner in our endeavor to increase the positive awareness of the City. Mounds View is completely split by Highway 10 and hopes to achieve a union of the City with an aggressive Marketing Program. I will call you next week to see if you have any questions with the application and request for a variance. In the mean time feel free to contact me at 784-3055. Sincerely, 1 C' Cathy L nnett Economic Development Coordinator MN/DOT 1723 (10/81) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES OR FOR PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS ON TRUNK HIGHWAY Control Trunk Section Hwy. Prepared in Triplicate.Forward or deliver all copies to proper District/Area Maintenance Office. District Permit No. No. Applicant Tel.No.�,, Address ..g , 4. -y1 t000 /. VI esu Lea- 71 _ c) 0/ III /t7 7y� Party,.• •orming work Tel.No. biz "fob keg.) yjf 'j/. / r/ I Nature of ork A. a II0 ... rubric ..k.,� i 1 Surface to be disturbedi_ a. / r .i d 3 )X 8� #a>7•Y)Cy 5c 0Concrete IIS shoulder to be disturbed •, 0Gravel (check one) 0 Bitum. •_a None — T.H. I County Municipality ❑ Yes :i No �t7 P;�) I Street or Ave. TY,.S ' // _ A .,' •- . Intersecting T.H. at: (ties - land or street lines)J ! ' A Zpy7, If � 0 T`H give t=shy motion, or land lines if rural G Size and d of pipe frn Depth ro.. surfac: '' t1 Z.-Ca-e.-t_��"4-- n� - I n/,q_ I No. and size of excavations Method of installation or construction ork to start on or after • it1 u . kl' 0 • _ .m U a LP F y, Q �n or I Timet required to complete work LJ�Tl," Cls'" Is traffic de -ur necessary If detour is necessary, describe rerouting _`� hd ❑ Yes No I, We, the undersigned, herewith accept the terms and conditions of the regulations of the Commissioner of Transportation and agree to fully comply therewith to the satisfaction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Furthermore, except for the negligent acts of the State, its agents and employees, the applicant or his agents or contractor shall assume all liability for, and save the State, its agents and employees, harmless from, any and all claims for damages, actions or causes of action arising out of the work to be done herein and the continuing usage, constructing, reconstructing, maintaining and using of said utility under this application and Permit for construction. Dated 9—9 " fr- Applicant's 24 ,j Signature. -/`` , , gyp SEE REVERSE SIDE AUTHORIZATION OF PERMIT FOR REGULATIONS (PERMIT NOT VALID UNLESS BEARING SIGNATURE AND NUMBER) Permit No his In consideration of their agreement to comply in all respects with the regulations of the Commissioner of Transportation covering such operations, permission is hereby granted for the work to be done as described in the above application, said work to be done in accordance with special precautions required as hereby stated: It is expressly understood that this permit is conditioned upon replacement or restoration of the trunk highway to its original or to a satisfactory condition. It is further understood that this permit is issued subject to the approval of local city, village or borough authorities having joint supervision over said street or highway and subject to the applicant's compliance with the rules and regulations of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board and any other affected governmental agencies. White copy to Applicant MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Green to Foreman Pink to District/Area Maintenance Engineer Dated Authorized uthoriThe date when work is completed must be reported w District/Area Maintena tce E gid eeaaure gneer Return this portion when work is completed: No Deposit Required Permit No For Deposit in Amount of ; Required and Attached Hereto. Date work completed District Cashier's Check No Use Only Or Certified Check No This Deposit Made by — Applicant Bond No. 09/05/95 14:10 FAX 612 942 9182 DISPLAY SALES 444 CITY OF MV 0 00 1 • r - . . - tio . V `„...,.. IBJ ve d . . Yollititilli/ r' <67,=e9- 1 • Pride b o c , . . . . p Progress . y, Parthership7 .. •.. . . . . isplay City of ales . , / 9910 West i4th Street Eden Pra r e,MM 55344 Mounds (6]?�442 3150 Vi• . ew Hers UW • Metro Division GUIDELINES FOR USE OF RIGI-IT- OF-WAY FOR SPECIAL EVENTS Page 2 ► Use of Right-of-Way. Within each of these divisions, the guidelines are categorized as follows: Freeways Includes interchange areas on expressways Expressways Does not include interchange areas Two-Lane, Two- Spe Glx i 40 m; s per hour-or-greater ncludes segments-that Way Higfiways may.haveadditionaF.-lanes"for passing, turning or.bypassing./ and for short'segmentsof four or_more lanes Low Speed Roads Speed limit less than 40 miles per hour; generally includes those segments of trunk highways that pass though a city and/or serve a city street-type function and all frontage roads SIGNS, BANNERS AND DECORATIONS Directional signs, non-directional signs,banners and overhead decorations will be permitted, only on"low speed roads(subject to the following criteria: ► A legate public interest must be served. ► Requests shall be made through the offices of or by the city-in which the devices would be installed. (If the location is not within a city, requests may be made directly to the roadway regulations supervisors. Requests may also be made directly to the supervisors in those instances where a single event may take place within several cities, e. g., "The Parade of Homes.") ► Directional signing shall conform to criteria specified in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and the Minnesota Department of Transportation Traffic Engineering Manual or as directed by the division traffic engineer for traffic services. ► Directional signing shall contain directional information for the event only; no other advertisement shall be permitted. ► . Non-directional signs or banners shall not appear to represent or conflict with an official traffic control device in shape, form, color or legend; they shall be of a neutral color: Metro Division GUIDELINES FOR USE OF RIGI-IT- OF-WAY FOR SPECIAL EVENTS Page 3 ► Non directional signs or Tanners shall display only name of the event and the time scheduled for it no other advertisement shall be permitted. ► Lettering and overall size of non-directional signs or banners shall be adequate to assure legibility. ► Non directional signs,or banners shall not be. placed in such a manner so as to inerf a with obstiuct ordlstract motorists' attention'frorr official traffic 't CQ€1t vices ► Signs or bane i shall not b& Iaced-in-such a manner so as to interfere with or obstruct minimum sight distance. ► No changeable message signs of the type used for temporary or permanent traffic control will be permitted. (Such changeable message devices may be used for traffic control purposes at the discretion of the division traffic engineer for traffic services.) ► Lighting, flashers, flags, rotating devices or other mechanical devices which produce motions of an attention-getting manner will not be permitted in conjunction with or adjacent to non-directional signs or banners. Such items used in conjunction with decorations shall be considered on a case by case basis. ► The minimum clearancefor all overhead signs, banners and decorations.shall-J be 22 feet above the roadway and shoulder except here mounting on an existing structure_has been permitted. All devices mounted on the roadside shall be located on the outer portion of the right-of-way except for those devices to be used for traffic control. ► Adequate police protection and traffic control devices shall be used when an overhead device is being installed and removed. There shall be no interference with traffic on weekdays other than between 9:00 A. M. and 3:00 P. M. or as directed in the permit. Traffic shall be maintained, unimpeded, at all times other than for the brief periods when traffic must be stopped for erection or removal. ► If permanent signing relating to an event is in place, additional signing may be partially or totally restricted. ► Non-directional signs or banners shall not be in place longer than two weeks prior to an event and shall be removed within three days after the last day of _; I CRY OF 1111REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 17. 0,06 STAFF REPORT Report Number:� AGENDA SESSION DATE October 2, 1995 Report Date: DISPOSITION Item Description: Continued Discussion of Proposed 1996 Budget Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report c f - Comments attached. ' ' '' .mn/Su imaryyattach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; Attached please find revised 1996 Proposed General Fund Revenue and Expenditure budgets reflecting changes made at the last budget work session. The Police Crime Prevention budget was increased by $39,221 to reflect the hiring of a police officer under the C.O.P.S. grant program. To offset these increased expenditures account 100-4700-975, Salary Adjustments, Comp Worth was reduced by$10,000 and Revenues ( Account 100-3690, Other Grants) were increased by $29,221, the estimated amount of the C.O.P.S. grant. The proposed levy certified to Ramsey County is 6% more than the 1995 levy. That 6% increase raises an additional $95,594 in property taxes. The average home's taxes would increase 7.03%, or $17.24 if this levy is adopted. If a 3% increase in the levy were adopted it would raise an additional $47,797 in property taxes and the average home's taxes would increase by 2.88% or $7.07. Debt Service required on the Fire Improvement Bonds for 1996 is $92,565 compared to the 1995 Debt Service levy of$94,596. That decrease has the effect of increasing the amount of taxes for the General Fund. At a 3% levy increase the additional levy allocated to the General Fund is $49,828, or 3.3% more than was allocated in 1995. At a 6% levy increase, the additional levy allocated to the General Fund is $97,625, or an increase over 1995 of 6.5%. The additional $97,625 has been placed in a separate contingency account until Council determines a use for these additional revenues. Staff has presented the proposed 1996 budget with a 6% levy increase in the special budget edition of the City Newsletter. Staff seeks Council direction as to the budget to present at the Information Meeting on the 1996 budget to be held October 23. RECOMMENDATION; A Donald Brager, Finance I)rector DEPARTMENT: POLICE OGRAM: CRIME PREVENTION 1996 RESOURCE ALLOCATION EXPENDITURES1993 1994 1995 ACTUAL ACTUAL, 1996 1996 BUDGET BUDGET APPR'D Employee Services $17,400 ',21,445 $17,236 Materials & Services IIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIII $61,910 Contractual Services 700 MI mil 224 iiim274 mili4in 13 Capital Outlay TOTAL 1,000 MO APPROPRIATION $17,624 $21,719 $17,649 $64,142 MI Ill ,..: PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS .:,: :.:::.....-...-- ..-.-.„ 1993 1994 1995 POSITION ACTUAL ACTUAL 1996 1996 BUDGET BUDGET APPROVED F-T Positions: DARE OFFICER .40 .40 .40 .40 SECRETARY IIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111111111111111111111 C.O.P. OFFICER OS 1111111111111 P-T Positions: ----1111111111111111111111111111111I-00 MI. MIIIIMIMIMIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIMIMIMIIIIIIIMIIIIIIII 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 TOTAL FTE'S .45 111111111111 45 .45 1 .45 111111111111111 0 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET DETAIL- 1996 EXPENDITURES 100-4202 GENERAL FUND POLICE - CRIME PREVENTION 1993 1994 1995 1995 DEPARTMENT TEAM COUNCIL • ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED Y.T.D. REQUESTS REQUESTS APPROVES PERSONNEL SERVICES 010 SALARIES, REGULAR $17,400 $16,660 $13,482 $5,193 $48,278 011 OVERTIME, REGULAR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 020 SALARIES, TEMP/PART-TIME $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 030 PENSIONS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 040 PENSIONS INSURANCE $0 $2,119 $1,536 $667 $6,193 $0 $0 050 WORKERS COMPENSATION $0 $1,550 $1,584 $455 $5,030 $0 $0 $0 $1,116 $634 $111 $2,409 $0 $0 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES $17,400 $21,445 $17,236 $6,426 $61,910 $0 $0 MATERIALS + SUPPLIES 111 STATIONERY $0 $0 $0 $0 121 SUPPLIES, BLDGS+GRNDS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 160 SUPPLIES, OPERATING $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 170 MOTOR FUELS+ LUBRICANT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 210 BOOKS +PERIODICALS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 240 UNIFORMS+ CLOTHING $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $700 $0 $0 TOTAL MATERIALS + SUPPLIES $0 $0 $0 $0 $700 $0 $0 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 303 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERV $0 $0 $0 343 PRINTING $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 361 MEMBERSHIPS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 363 TRAINING $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $224 $274 $413 $0 $532 $0 $0 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $224 $274 $413 $0 $532 $0 $0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 703 EQUIPMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 TOTAL POLICE - CRIME PREY $17,624 $21,719 $17,649 $6,426 $64,142 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 1996 BUDGETED REVENUES 100 GENERAL FUND ITEM DESCRIPTION 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 % '96 Budget ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROPOSED To '95 Budget GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES 3010 CURRENT AD VALOREM $1,087,709 3015 DELINQUENT AD VALOREM $1,214,706 $1,434,226 $1,498,632 $1,596,257 $3,641 ($16,067) ($5,326) $3,5976.51%8 $3,618$ 0.00 ° 3025 MOBILE HOME TAX $11,275 $8,553 3028 MOBILE HOME TAX- DEL. $0 $0 $0 0.00% $2 3030 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ,304 $1,002 $0 $0 $1,212 $1,607 $0 $0 0.00% 3070 PENALTIES&INTEREST $0 $0 $0 $7 0.ERR $3$ 3072 MOBILE HOME aFN-&_INT- $0 $ 3080 FORFEITED TAX SALES �0 $1/ $00 $0 $0 0 DRQ $ $425 $49 $384 $435 $384 -11.72%0.00% TOTAL GEN PROPERTY TAXES $1,106,566 $1,209,850 $1,429,671 $1,502,664 $1,600,646 6.52% LICENSES & PERMITS 3300 LICENSES $59,778 $55,963 3200 PERMITS $48,203 $45,613 $48,388 6.08% $51.915 $33,442 $109,056 $42,332 $53.060 25.34% TOTAL LICENSES& PERMITS $111,693 $89,405 $157,259 $87,945 $101,44815.35% FINES & FORFEITS 3710 RAMSEY CTY. MUN. CT. $28,897 $30,068 3720 MINN HIGHWAY PATROL $31,173 $29,$645 $30,668 3.84% $592 3730 ADMIN. OFFENSES $1 $350 $1,00663 $645 $668 3.57% 6,352 $16,784 $14,932 $15,050 $16.0236.47% TOTAL FINES&FORFEITS $45,841 $47,202 $47,168 $44,726 $46,8374.72% INTERGOV'TL REVENUE 3615 HOMESTEAD CREDIT $318,183 $344,674 3616 MOBILE HOME HOMESTD. $366,747 $375,4$0 $357,670 -0.70% 3621 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID $9,801 $8,757 $9,990 $0 $0 0.00% 3622 LOCAL $576,455 $547,183 $596,874 $614,547 $644,665 $69,521 $73,504 $79,9744.90% 3623 CIVIL DEFENSE $7,196 $6,500 $73,504$ $$6,400 8.80% 3671 STREET AID $6,400 $6,100 $6,400 4.92% 3671 OTHER AID IN AID $55,774 $61,303 $52,690 $61,528 $52,690 -14.36% $15,659 $30,179 $54,881 $6,415 $35,636 455.51% TOTAL INTERGOV'TL REVENUE $1,052,589 $1,072,100 $1,167,556 $1,137,565 $1,177,0353.47% CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 1996 BUDGETED REVENUES 100 GENERAL FUND 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 %'96 Budget ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROPOSED To'95 Budget CURRENT SERVICES 3401 SUBDIVISION $425 $650 $1,000 $450 $600 33.33% 3402 VARIANCE $875 $0 $775 $300 $375 25.00% 3403 REZONING $200 $350 $1,528 $200 $228 14.00% 3410 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE $0 $0 $0 3415 ADMIN. CHGE. - NON REFD $270 $510 $0 $0 0.00% 3420 ASSESSMENT SEARCH $2,599 $300 $300 0.00% $1,080 $610 $560 $640 $645 574% 3421-POLICE REPORTS $534 $503 $1,625 3422 DOCUMENTS/COPIES $104 $241 $563 $600 6.57% 3423 CUSTOMER SERVICE $411 $1854 $246 $256 4 00% $496 $455 $493 $493 0.00% 3424 DOG IMPOUNDING FEES $0 $0 $0 $0 3490 TREE REMOVAL $0 $4,261 $0 0.00% 3475 METER SALES $5,0$0 $4,0$0 $4,6$0 16.85% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00% TOTAL CURRENT SERVICES $3,899 $7,621 $13,814 $7,162 $8,171 14.09% OTHER REVENUES 3901 INVESTMENT INTEREST $42,179 $47,768 $62,303 $37,500 $60,795 62.12% 3911 SALE OF ASSETS $1,700 $4,931 $3,626 3912 RESALE OF MATERIALS $161 $370 $0 $0 0.00% 3921 FESTIVAL COMMISSION $335 $0 $0 0.00% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00% 3931 DONATIONS $4,000 $4,150 $4,449 $0 3951 INSURANCE REIMBS $21,413 $65,294 $0 0.00% 3961 TRANSFERS $19,645 $0 $0 0.00% $268,429 $442,751 $315,864 $338,624 $309,324 -8.65% 3971 FRANCHISE FEES $0 $0 $180,765 $152,341 3972 TRANSFER -TIF $0 $0 $92,790 $157,500 3.39% $0 3991 OTHER REVENUE $8,011$0 -143.08% 3992 LOAN PROCEEDS $5,151 $14,110 $31,290 $5,599 43.08% $93,477 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00% TOTAL OTHER REVENUES $436,510 $579,374 $618,277 $626,854 $535,630 -14.55% NON - REVENUE 3820 SURCHARGE $81 $0 $9,000 3850 APPROP - FUND BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00% 3890 OTHER NON-REVENUE $8 080 $0 $42,3$0 $45,000 6.30% $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00% TOTAL NON - REVENUE $8,161 $0 $9,000 $42,333 ° $45,000 6.30% TOTAL GENERAL FUND $2.765,259 $3.005.552 $3.442,745 $3,449.249 $3.514767 1.90% 100 GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY REVENUE SOURCES ITEM DESCRIPTION 1991 1993 1994 1995 ACTUAL ACTUAL 1996 % Est 6 ACTUAL BUDGETED PROPOSED To Budget 95 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES $1,106,566 GENERAL &PERMITS $1,209,850 $1,429,671 $1,502,664 $1,600,646 6.52% FINESN ES&PERM $111,693 $89,405 $157,259 $87,94555% $45,841 $47,202 $47,168 $101,448 14.72% INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE $1,052,589 $1,072,100 137,566 $46,837 4 7% CURRENT SERVICES $1,167,556 $1,137,565 $1,177,0353.47% OTHERRREVENUESS $3,899 $7,621 $13,814 $7,162 OH REVENUE $436,510 $579,374 $618,277 $626,854 $8,171 14.09% $8,161 $0 $9,000 $42,333 $535,630 —14.55% $45,000 6,30% GRAND TOTAL GENERAL FUND $2,765,259 3 005 5523.442.745 $3.449 24 314.767 1790% PROPOSED 1996 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE BUDGET 09/15/95 ACTUAL BUDGET 1995 1996 DEPT 1996 TEAM COUNCIL 1994 1995 YTD PROPOSED PROPOSED APPROVES GENERAL GOVERNMENT CITY COUNCIL $62,690 $65,107 CITY O COMMISSIONS $1,044 $36,987. $70,418 $60,392 $0 ($10,026) OFFICEOF CITY COMMISSIONS $1,603 $151 $1,006 $5,173 $0 OFFICE FSOURCES $113,025 $124,097 $36,623 $111,277 $111,577 $4 $24,470 $27,725 $13,995 $21,380 $0 $300 PUBLIC INFORMATION $52,895 $58,838 $21,38057 $0 $0 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS $15,023 $57,643 $30,336 $0 $279 ELECTIONS $23,982 $34,765 $9,577 $28,496 $30,336 $0 FINANCIAL RPT&AUDITING $9,248 $10,285 $457 $13,308 $13,410 $1,840 $49,159 $51,383 $15,972 $53,328 $0 $102 BUDGETING $37,924 $41,413 $15,879 $54,620 $0 $1,292 ACCT'G&PAYROLL SERVICES $33,926 $41,3482 $41,9943 $0 $646 FINANCIAL SERVICES $39,326 $14,693 $42,678 $43,970 $0 LEGAL $31,314 $26,110 $9,601 • $33,928 $33,928 $1,292 $73,261 $66,500 $15,961 $66,500 $0 $0 PLANNING $44,213 $45,209 $29,696 $76,500 $0 $10,000$ ENGINEERING SERVICES $8,525 $8,547 $46,948 $46,9488 $0 $0 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW a $3,078 $8,608 $8,608 $0 DEVELOPMENT $34''581 � 'f73 $1304$46,790 $46,790 - $0 $53,698 $98,424 $29,071 $98,163 $98,163 $0 $0 CODE ENFORCEMENT $26,926 $35,502 $10,614 $0 $0 CENTRAL SERVICES $190,044 $166,226 $70 176 $1188,,$37,8698622 2 $89, 8 $0 $0 , 2 $189,11888 $0 $566 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT $870,925 $946,233 $340,597 $968,310 $978,768 $0 $10,458 PUBLIC SAFETY POLICE ADMINISTRATION $211,420 CRIME ADMINISTRATION $206,381 $83,386 $206,796 $117,582 $0 ($89,214) COLICE PATROLS $21,719 $17,649 $6,426 $21,911 $64,142 INVESTIGATIONS $665,047 $684,419 $253,822 $708,254 $746,792 $0 $42,2318 POLICE INVESTIGATIONS MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS $114,988 $129,440 $48,365 $128,429 $174,949 $0 $46,520$46,5 AE $67,602 $67,528 $18,073 $69,156 $69,156 $0 $150,075 $162,418 $125,169 $170,334 $0 $0 EMERGENCY SERVICES $15,568 $17,317 $7,337 $164,2801 $0 ($6,054) COMMUNITY SERVICES $15,497 $18,244 $17,742 $18 221 $0 $0 $6,139 $18,221 $18 221 $0 $0 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY $1,261,916 $1,303,396 $548,717 $1,340,843 $1,372,864 $0 $32,021 STREETS & HIGHWAYS STREETS - PAVEMENT MGT $190,165 $198,026 $28,778 SNOW&ICE CONTROL $69,744 $57,955 $14 $9 464 $$91,250 $211,204,9509 $0 $0 SIGN MAINTENANCE $29,343 $27,768 $28,152, $28 $0 $0 FLEET SERVICES: $8,163 $28,536 $0 $384 BLDG&GRNDS MAINTENANCE $59,233 $49,016 $22,864 $56,159 $56,159 SQUAD &STAFF CARS $43,203 $48,117 $18,413 $0 $0 VEHICLE&EQUIPMENT $17 892 $20 199 $8 774 $22,929 $2 $0 $0 , $21,929 $21 1,992929 $0 $0 TOTAL STREETS & HIGHWAYS $409,580 $401,081 $101,456 $461,974 $462,358 $0 $384 PARKS & RECREATION RECREATION ADMINISTRATION $18,617 $19,691 $3,215 $20,557 $24,557 RECREATION PROGRAMMING $54,404 $63,779 $11,977 $0 $4,000$916 RECREATION SALES&MARKETING $26,687 $60,81153 $61,727039 $0 8 PARKS ADMINISTRATION $30,778 $15,494 $30,253 $30,739 $0 $486 PARKS IMPROVEMENTSA $27,324 $31,402 $18,253 $29,562 $29,562 $0 $0 PARKS MA &REPAIR $63,879 $63,434 $20,567 $37,954 $57,954 $0 $20,000 ATHLETICARGENELD MAINTENANCE $153,196 $230,482 $93,038 $145,029 $145,029 $0 $11,744 $8,697 $7,557 $14,385 $14,385 $0 TREE DISEASE CONTROL $20,624 $24,936 $5,591 $0 $0 REFORESTATION/BEAUTIFICATION $22,880 $25,262809 $18,809$28,8 $0 $0 GOLF COURSE $15,993 $7,291 $18,809 $0 $0 $0 $28,402 $52,341 $0 $g $0 $0 $0 TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION $427,757 $541,533 $182,983 $382,622 $408,024 $0 $25,402 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 09/15/95 RECRUITMENT&RETENTION $75,568 $82,455 $22,432 $90,673 MARKETING $13,132 $20,973 $10,590 $20 982 $0 $0 ($20,982) $0 $0 ($20,982) TOTAL ECON DEVELOPMENT $88,700 $103,428 $33,022 $111,655 $0 $0 ($111,655) SOCIAL SERVICES COORDINATION FAMILY SERVICES $0 $13,500 $0 $13,500 $13,500 $0 $0 INCREASES (DECREASES) CONTINGENCY $0 $60,000 $0 $75,000 $70,777 CONTINGENCY- COUNCIL $0 $0 $0 $0 $97 625 $0 (97,625) SALARY ADJ - COMP WORTH $0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 $10,000 $0 $10,000 TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS $32,523 $52,578 $0 $52,578 $63,351 $0 ($10,773) REPAIRS AND BETTERMENTS $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $30,000 $0 $20,000 FITNESS PROGRAM $3,727 $7,500 $0 $7,500 $7,500 $0 {$20,0$0) $0 TOTAL INC(DEC) $36,250 $140,078 $0 $205,078 $279,253 $0 $74,175 TOTAL-GENERATOTAL-GENERAL-FUND $3,095,128 $3,449,249 $1,206,775 $3,483,982 $3,514,767 �0 $30,785 0 0 —I .3- 3 = = v v iv cX o O co Q v c CD CD CO cn =. o O CD � I O 0 0 3 3 3 CD Co" co" 0 Cn 01 ...I ■ !""F` 10 1< o O O --x Q C31 = CD _. N co ( CD W Ni N a o O O O coNCD .....% O CO C CD co Nio- c' '' --i = -o) X 5- W CI Ni -N -N CD C) x 'co -.1 NN r Cin c Oy cn -.1 CCID Nn CD CD ‘. < CD 77 CD CD C ) CD o I + = Ni CD CO CO C) O � N Cn CO � (76 su o -A co -is. Ni CD CD CTY®Fr REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 18. ! S STAFF REPORT Report Number: 95-1480WS V AGENDA SESSION DATE October 2. 1995 Report Date: , , 95 DISPOSITION Item Description: Discussion of Possible Innovative Grant Projects Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement-sheets-aa-necessar30 ,SUMMARY; The State Board of Innovation will be considering grant applications soon from government entities who wish to receive State funding to explore creative, cooperative or collaborative service delivery and economic development efforts. The grant information and application is attached for your review. The Council may want to brainstorm a bit Monday night about possible projects that would qualify for grant funding. There are two possible projects that may be worth exploring: 1. Consolidation of police services of the cities of Blaine, Spring Lake Park and Mounds View. 2. A coordinated economic redevelopment approach to the Highway 10 corridor by the cities of Arden Hills, Mounds View and Spring Lake Park. The first project represents a "window of opportunity" due to the retirement of all three Police Chiefs and top personnel in the three cities in the next 2-3 years. Consolidating the police service would allow for greater patrol efforts and specialization of crime prevention and investigative efforts that are not possible now in the three separate units. A sidebar to this possible project may be to examine the process by which Mounds View would annex to Anoka County. J Samantha OrdunoCity A•ministrator RECOMMENDATION• STAFF REPORT PAGE TWO SEPTEMBER 28, 1995 The Highway 10 effort is one that would involve a coordinated approach to the Corridor redevelopment involving all of these cities. This is especially "topical" now as Arden Hills begins to explore possible long term development along Highway 10 and Spring Lake Park has now geared up for some redevelopment efforts. Please review the material and make a list of the projects you feel would qualify. State of Minnesota Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation 309 Administration Building• 50 Sherburne Avenue• Saint Paul,Minnesota 56155• 612/282-2390• Fax 612/282-5333 September 5, 1995 TO: All Interested Individuals FROM: Jim Gelbmann Executive Director RE: Competitive Grants From The Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation Attached to this memo, please find a complete packet of information regarding the Board's three competitive grant programs. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute, the Board is able to award Service Budget Management Model Grants, Cooperation Planning Grants, and Service Sharing Grants for local governments and other affiliated interests that are willing to develop and implement innovative or cooperative service delivery systems. The Service Budget Management Model Grants and the Cooperation Planning Grants may not exceed $50,000 a piece. The Service Sharing grants may not exceed $100,000 each. This year, the Board has a total of approximately $750,000 available for all grants. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE GUIDELINES FOR THE GRANT PROGRAMS Statutory Changes The 1995 Minnesota Legislature established additional guidelines for the Board's competitive grant programs. Specifically, the Legislature specified that "the application [for all competitive grants] ... must state what other sources of funding have been considered by the local units of government to implement the project and explain why it is not possible to complete the project without assistance from the board." The new statutory language also specifies that "the board may not award a grant if it determines that the local units of government could complete the project without board assistance." Given this new statutory language, you will notice that a request for additional information has been incorporated into the application narrative relative to the need for state financial assistance. Given the statutory directive, please provide a comprehensive and accurate response to all questions relating to the need for the state's financial assistance. r BOARD OF GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND COOPERATION 1995 APPLICATION PACKET Service Budget Management Model Grants, Cooperation Planning Grants, (Y6 Service Sharing Grants MINNESOTA BOARD OF GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND COOPERATION Notice of Grant Availability The Minnesota Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation announces the availability of grants for local units of governments and affiliated organizations. Approximately $750,000 is available for three grant categories; the Board will jointly consider the applications in all three grant categories without initially allocating funds to each category. Eligible Applicants Counties, cities, school districts, towns, and special taxing districts; associations of local governments; the Metropolitan Council, organizations and state agencies with a local government partner; and organizations established by two or more local governments under a joint powers agreement. • Grant Criteria All applicants must indicate what other sources of funding have been considered to implement the project and explain why it is not possible to complete the project without State financial assistance. Preference will be given to applications that: • propose an innovative idea for a cooperative planning, service budget management model, or service sharing pilot project. An innovative idea includes an activity which has not been previously funded by the Board and is not already being done within the state; • focus on the improved delivery of an existing public service, as opposed to applications that focus on new services or service enhancements; and • anticipate improved public service outcomes, and which incorporate a realistic method for measuring those improved outcomes. Grant Categories Service Budget One or more applicants may apply for funds to develop a model for Management innovative service delivery. The model will identify a new means of Model providing a service currently being delivered by the applicants, utilizing Grants their existing financial resources and improving the quality of the service. Grants will not exceed $50,000. Grantees must agree to implement the model once it is developed. Application Process PRE-APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS 1. Read the application packet and call the Board's staff at 612/282-2390 if you have any questions or need more information. 2. Develop a basic idea for the project and determine who are your potential partners. 3. Get the potential partners together and discuss everyone's ideas. A "convener" is usually necessary to get the project initiated, but it is usually not very effective for one person to fully develop the project on their own and then shop for partners who are willing to go along. 4. In collaboration with all potential partners: a. Refine the proposal in accordance with the pre-application forms. b. Determine which potential partners are in sufficient support of the project to be included in the pre-application. Please note that different applicants can be named when the application is submitted; participation at the pre-application stage is not a final commitment to participate in the project. c. Decide which grant category is appropriate for the proposal; reading the grant category description and the "NARRATIVE FORMAT" section of each application form is a good way to start. Please note that the Board may assign the project to a different category during its review of the pre-application. d. Develop a clear understanding of what the benefits of the project will be for: the partners; their customers, clients, and taxpayers; and other local governments. The benefits of the project should focus on improved service outcomes and the applicants should be able to develop a methodology for measuring the improved service outcomes. e. Develop an estimate of the total cost of the project and make a preliminary determination of how much money will be requested from the Board. Detailed budget projections are not required at the pre-application stage. f. Determine who the contact person will be for the pre-application. This person should be able to answer questions about the pre-application. 5. Have someone from the group of potential partners attend the applicant workshop if at all possible. It will be a helpful forum to get questions addressed, as well as to hear responses to the issues raised by others. 6. Prepare the PRE-APPLICATION COVER PAGE and NARRATIVE. Answer all the questions on the COVER PAGE and be sure that all the issues in the NARRATIVE FORMAT have been addressed. You must submit a pre-application by the November 22, 1995, deadline in order to be eligible to submit a final application. 7. Use the "Checklist for Mailing Your Pre-Application" to be sure all requirements are met. 8. Mail or deliver the pre-application packet. Please do not fax pre-applications to the Board's Office. Be sure the Board will receive it by 5:00 p.m. on November 22, 1995. Pre-applications received after the deadline will not be considered. APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS 1. Read the application packet and call the Board's staff at 612/282-2390 if you have any questions or need more information. 2. Make a note of the grant number and grant category assigned to the project by the Board in its notice informing you of the score you received on your pre-application. Contact the Board's staff if there are any concerns about the grant category assigned by the Board. 3. Convene the potential partners and discuss everyone's ideas. It is important to have everyone involved in developing the application. 4. In collaboration with all potential partners: a. Refine the proposal in accordance with the application forms. Be sure that all the issues in the APPLICATION NARRATIVE FORMAT are discussed and agreed upon, including a work product and a planning or implementation process. b. Determine which potential partners are in sufficient support of the project to be included in the application. Please note that the Board will consider all applicants included on the application to have committed to participating in the project. c. Develop a detailed budget for the project and determine how much money will be requested from the Board. This amount may differ from the pre-application, but may not exceed the statutory maximum for the application's grant category. d. Determine who the contact person will be for the application: This person should be able to answer questions about the application. 5. For all partners that will be included in the application, determine which have exclusive representatives (unions) representing employees who provide the program or service that will be affected by the application. Note that a copy of the application will have to be sent to each of these exclusive representatives. 6. Prepare the APPLICATION COVER PAGE and NARRATIVE. Use the forms for the correct grant category. Answer all the questions on the COVER PAGE and be sure that all the issues in the NARRATIVE FORMAT have been addressed. 7. Obtain all necessary signatures. Note that the application must be signed by the senior elected or administrative official of each applicant. However, the signatures do not have to be originals (facsimile copies are acceptable) and each applicant may sign on a different sheet of paper if necessary. 8. Use the "Checklist for Mailing Your Application" to be sure all requirements are met. 9. Mail or deliver the application packet. Please do not fax applications to the Board's Office. Be sure the Board will receive it by 5:00 p.m. on March 15, 1996. Applications received after the deadline will not be considered. Application Forms MINNESOTA BOARD OF GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND COOPERATION —sem Use Only— Date Received: 1995 PRE-APPLICATION COVER PAGE Grant Number: 1. Applicant Name(s) List all proposed applicants. 2. Contact Person This person should be able to respond to questions regarding the pre-application. Name: Address: Title: Agency: Telephone Number: Fax Number: 3. Grant Program Identify the grant category for which you are submitting this proposal. ❑ Service Budget Management Model grant ($50,000 maximum) ❑ Cooperation Planning grant ($50,000 maximum) ❑ Service Sharing grant ($100,000 maximum) 4. Estimated Costs Total estimated cost of the proposal $ Estimated grant request $ This pre-application is submitted to the Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation pursuant to M.S. 465.798, 465.799, or 465.801. To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in this proposal is accurate and complete. (Signature) (Title&Local Government Unit or Organization) (Date) (The cover page must be signed by the senior elected or administrative official of one applicant agency.) The Pre-application must be returned to the Board Office no later than 5:00 p.m., November 22, 1995. (SEE OTHER SIDE) SERVICE BUDGET MANAGEMENT MODEL GRANTS The Minnesota Legislature authorized Service Budget Management Model grants for local government units interested in developing models for innovative service budget management. The goal of a Service Budget Management Model is to identify a means of utilizing existing financial resources budgeted for the delivery of a specific service to fund an innovative service delivery system that will improve 3er'rice outcomes. An objective of a Service Budget Management Model is to involve the customers of a given service in the decision-making process. Therefore, a Service Budget Management Model will give recipients of public services -- including neighborhoods, community organizations, and individuals -- the power to make decisions about how public finds-for aspecificservioe will be spent Another objective of a Service Budget Management Model is to develop a delivery system that can be easily replicated by other local government units. Therefore, a Service Budget Management Model will include a work product describing the model in a format that facilitates replication. An example of an existing Service Budget Management Model will better define the concept: During the early 1980s, residents of Maple Grove expressed concern about the poor quality bus service it was receiving from the Metropolitan Transit Commission. As an "end-of-the-line" suburb, Maple Grove residents were forced to rely on bus transportation that involved lengthy commutes into Minneapolis. As a result of legislation adopted in response to these concerns, Maple Grove and other communities were given the opportunity to opt out of MTC services. By opting out of the system, the community received most of its local property tax levy designated for transit. It could then use those funds to design transit services to meet local needs. The city of Maple Grove opted out of the metropolitan transit system and developed transit services that were more responsive to the needs of Maple Grove residents. The city now uses a property tax levy that raises approximately $750,000 per year for customized transit services. This levy is considerably lower than the average metropolitan area levy for transit services. The vendor for the customized transit services, which is the Metropolitan Transit Commission, was selected by the city through a competitive bidding process. Under a three-year contract, the MTC provides and operates twelve buses clearly identified with the "Maple Grove Transit" logo. Residents of Maple Grove now receive non-stop bus service into downtown Minneapolis. As a result of the customized services, there has been a 400 percent increase in the use of bus transportation by Maple Grove residents. A Service Budget Management Model grant would be appropriate for one or more applicants who are at the planning stage of developing their project. MINNESOTA BOARD OF GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND COOPERATION —State Use only — Date Received: 1995 SERVICE BUDGET MANAGEMENT MODEL GRANT APPLICATION COVER PAGE 1. Grant Number Indicate the grant number assigned by the Board to your pre-application. -95- 2. Abstract Describe your proposed project by completing the following sentence. Indicate the service or program for which you_propose_to deuelop-a-seruice-budge management-nodes This application requests funding to develop a service budget management model for ... 3. Grant Request Indicate the amount of funding you are requesting from the Board. $ ($50,000 maximum) 4. Applicant Name(s) List all applicants;they may differ from the applicants listed on your pre-application. Indicate which applicant will act as the project's fiscal host if you are awarded a grant: 5. Contact Person The contact person should be able to respond to questions regarding this application. Name: Address: Title: Agency: Telephone Number: Fax Number: (CFP nTr-rFR crnc SERVICE BUDGET MANAGEMENT MODEL GRANT APPLICATION NARRATIVE FORMAT Prepare a narrative that explains your proposed project. Use the following outline and be sure that your narrative addresses the indicated issues. The narrative should not exceed eight pages. A. Proposed Project Describe in as much detail as you can your proposed model for innovative service budget anagement. How-are-you-currently providing the service or program?—What are you proposing to do differently? To what problems or opportunities are you responding? Estimate how much you are currently spending on the delivery of the service or program. Will this entire amount be transferred to the implementation of the model? Are you aware of any current or past attempt to develop or implement a model for innovative service budget management that is similar to the model you propose to develop and implement? If so, describe that attempt and its outcome, and explain how your proposal will be different from that attempt. • If you are submitting this application as a single local government unit, explain why you chose to apply independently. B. Benefit Expand on the information you provided in your pre-application regarding the benefits of your proposed project. What positive outcomes do you expect to achieve by implementing your model? How will you measure those outcomes? Be as specific as possible when describing the improved service outcomes and the methodology you will use to measure the improvement in the outcomes. Do you expect cost savings to result from your proposed model? If so, what is your best estimate of annual savings? Explain how you calculated your estimate. (While it may be difficult to make such an estimate, you should note that you will not receive any points for a cost/benefit ratio if you do not.) C. Work Product Describe in detail the work product that you intend to prepare during the development phase of your project. A work product must be a tangible narrative or other output that can be shared with another unit of government that may want to replicate the project. Explain how you will use the work product to implement your model. How will the work product be useful to other local governments interested in replicating your model? COOPERATION PLANNING GRANTS The Minnesota Legislature authorized Cooperation Planning Grants for local government units interested in developing plans for intergovernmental cooperation in the delivery of public services. The goal of a Cooperation Planning grant is to assist two or more local government units to achieve cost savings and/or improve service outcomes through joint service delivery. An objective of a Cooperation Planning grant is to develop a joint delivery system that can be easily replicated by other local government units. Therefore, a Cooperation Planning grant will include a work product describing the joint delivery system in a format that facilitates replication. Over the past decade, there has been a substantial increase in cooperative intergovernmental efforts for delivering public services. As a result, thousands of formal and informal intergovernmental cooperative service delivery systems are already in place. Many local governments have realized the significant benefits that can be attained through intergovernmental cooperation, often through economies of scale. A common example of improved services at lower cost through intergovernmental cooperation will better define the concept: Many cities and counties have entered into joint powers agreements for dispatching public safety services. Under such agreements, a centralized emergency communication center receives requests for public safety services and dispatches the appropriate emergency personnel. Utilizing a centralized communication center often reduces the cost of public safety dispatching services by eliminating the need for each participating local government to maintain its own 24-hour dispatching center. Centralized communication centers may be able to respond more quickly, allocate resources more effectively, afford more advanced equipment, pay higher salaries, and provide better training than independent centers. A Cooperation Planning grant would be appropriate for two or more applicants who are at the planning stage of developing their joint delivery of a service. MINNESOTA BOARD OF GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND COOPERATION —State Use Only Date Received: 1995 COOPERA'T'ION PLANNING GRANT APPLICATION C10. Grant PAGE Number Indicate the grant number assigned by the Board to your pre-application. -95- 2. Abstract Describe your proposed project by completing the following sentence. Indicate the service-orprogram-yoR are proposing to deliver t h intergovernmental cooperation. This application requests funding to plan for the implementation of... 3. Grant Request Indicate the amount of funding you are requesting from the Board. $ ($50,000 maximum) 4. Applicant Names List all applicants;they may differ from the applicants listed on your pre-application. Indicate which applicant will act as the project's fiscal host if you are awarded a grant: 5. Contact Person The contact person should be able to respond to questions regarding this application. Name: Address: Title: Agency: Telephone Number: Fax Number: 1995 COOPERATION PLANNING GRANT APPLICATION NARRATIVE FORMAT Prepare a narrative that explains your proposed project. Use the following outline and be sure that your narrative addresses the ;ndicated issues. The narrative should not exceed eight pages. A. Proposed Project Describe in as much detail as you can your proposed project to plan for and implement the delivery of a-ser_vic-e or program thraugh�tergovernrnental-cooperation. How--are—you currently providing the service or program? What are you proposing to do differently? To what problems or opportunities are you responding? Estimate how much each applicant is currently spending on the delivery of the service or program, if any. Will this entire amount be transferred to the implementation phase of the project? Are you aware of any current or past attempt to develop or implement an intergovernmental cooperation project that is similar to your proposal? If so, describe that attempt and its outcome, and explain how your proposal will be different from that attempt. B. Benefit Expand on the information you provided in your pre-application regarding the benefits of your proposed project. What positive outcomes do you expect to achieve by delivering your service or program through intergovernmental cooperation? How will you measure those outcomes? Be as specific as possible when describing the improved service outcomes and the methodology you will use to measure the improvement in the outcomes. Do you expect cost savings to result from implementing your proposal? If so, what is your best estimate of annual savings? Explain how you calculated your estimate. (While it may be difficult to make such an estimate, you should note that you will not receive any points for a cost/benefit ratio if you do not.) C. Work Product Describe in detail the work product that you intend to develop during the planning phase of your project. A work product must be a tangible narrative or other output that can be shared with another unit of government that may want to replicate the project. Explain how you will use the work product to implement the intergovernmental delivery of your service or program. How will the work product be useful to other local governments interested in • replicating your project? SERVICE SHARING GRANTS The Minnesota Legislature authorized Service Sharing grants for local government units interested in implementing shared services or functions. The goal of a Service Sharing grant is to assist two or more local government units to achieve cost savings and/or improve service outcomes through meeting the start-up costs of providing fully-integrated public services. An objective of a Service Sharing grant is to implement a joint service that can be easily replicated by other local government units. Therefore, a Service Sharing grant will include a work product describing the joint delivery system in a format that facilitates replication. Over the past decade, there has been a substantial increase in cooperative intergovernmental efforts for delivering public services. As a result, thousands of formal and informal intergovernmental cooperative service delivery systems are already in place. Many local governments have realized the significant benefits that can be attained through intergovernmental cooperation, often through economies of scale. A common example of improved services at lower cost through intergovernmental cooperation will better define the concept: Many cities and counties have entered into joint powers agreements for dispatching public safety services. Under such agreements, a centralized emergency communication center receives requests for public safety services and dispatches the appropriate emergency personnel. Utilizing a centralized communication center often reduces the cost of public safety dispatching services by eliminating the need for each participating local government to maintain its own 24-hour dispatching center. Centralized communication centers may be able to respond more quickly, allocate resources more effectively, afford more advanced equipment, pay higher salaries, and provide better training than independent centers. However, there are often significant start-up costs that prevent local governments from implementing joint delivery systems. Using the above example, a number of local governments may be willing to create a centralized communication center, but are unable to because they cannot finance the initial cost of compatible communications equipment for all participating local governments. A Service Sharing grant would be appropriate for two or more applicants who are ready to implement a fully-integrated public service and are able to secure operating funds for the service, but need assistance to offset the start-up costs associated with implementation. MINNESOTA BOARD OF GOVERNMENT —State Use Only— INNOVATION AND COOPERATION Date Received: 1995 SERVICE SHARING GRANT APPLICATION COVER PAGE 1. Grant Number Indicate the grant number assigned by the Board to your pre-application. -95- 2. Abstract Describe your proposed project by completing the following sentence. Indicate the service or progra-rn-you-plan-to-deliver-jointly -This application requests funding for the start-up costs of providing fully integrated ... 3. Grant Request Indicate the amount offunding you are requesting from the Board. $ ($100,000 maximum) 4. Applicant Names List all applicants; they may differ from the applicants listed on your pre-application. Indicate which applicant will act as the project's fiscal host if you are awarded a grant: 5. Contact Person The contact person should be able to respond to questions regarding this application. Name: Address: Title: Agency: Telephone Number: Fax Number: SERVICE SHARING GRANT APPLICATION NARRATIVE E FORMAT Prepare a narrative that explains your proposed project. Use the following outline and be sure that your narrative addresses the indicated issues. The narrative should not exceed eight pages. A. Proposed Project Describe in detail your proposed project to implement a fully integrated service or program:How are you-currently-providing-the-service-0Tlsrogram?what are you proposing to do differently? To what problems or opportunities are you responding? Estimate how much each applicant is currently spending on the delivery of the service or program, if any. Will this entire amount be available for implementing the integrated service or program? Are you aware of any current or past attempt to develop or implement an integrated service or program that is similar to your proposal? If so, describe that attempt and its outcome, and explain how your proposal will be different from that attempt. B. Benefit Expand on the information you provided in your pre-application regarding the benefits of your proposed project. What positive outcomes do you expect to achieve by integrating your service or program? How will you measure those outcomes? Be as specific as possible when describing the improved service outcomes and the methodology you will use to measure the improvement in the outcomes. Do you expect cost savings to result from your proposal? If so, what is your best estimate of annual savings? Explain how you calculated your estimate; do not include one-time only start-up costs in determining the cost of providing the fully integrated service or program. (While it may be difficult to make such an estimate, you should note that you will not receive any points for a cost/benefit ratio if you do not.) C. Work Product Describe in detail the work product that you intend to develop during your project. A work product must be a tangible narrative or other output that can be shared with another unit of government that may want to replicate the project. How will the work product be useful to other local governments interested in replicating your project? Reference Materials GRANT SUMMARY Service Budget Management Model Cooperation Planning Service Sharing Grants Grants Grants Statutory To develop models for To develop a plan for To meet the startup costs goal innovative service budget intergovernmental of providing shared management. Proposed cooperation in providing services or functions. The models may provide services. The plan may proposal must include options to local govern- include model contracts or plans to fully integrate a. ments, neighborhood or agreements to be used to service or function -community-organizations,imnplement-the-plan. -provided-by-two-or-norms or individuals for local governments. managing budgets for Agreements solely to make service delivery. joint purchases are not sufficient to qualify. Eligible One or more applicants. Two or more applicants. Two or more applicants. applicants May be: a county, city, May include: a county, May include: a county, school district, town, or city, school district, town, city, school district, town, special taxing district; an or special taxing district; or special taxing district; association of local an association of local an association of local governments; the governments; a local governments; a local Metropolitan Council; a government in conjunction government in conjunction local government in with the Metropolitan with the Metropolitan conjunction with an Council, an organization, Council, an organization, organization or a state or a state agency; or an or a state agency; or an agency; or an organization organization established by organization established by established by two or more two or more local two or more local local governments under a governments under a joint governments under a joint joint powers agreement. powers agreement. powers agreement. Maximum $50,000 $50,000 $100,000 grant Other 1. A copy of the application must be provided by the applicants to the exclusive requirements representatives (unions) certified under M.S. 179A.12 to represent employees who provide the service or program affected by the application. 2. A copy of the work product must be given to the board upon completion, and the board may disseminate it to other local government units or interested groups. 3. If the project is not completed or implemented according to the terms of the grant contract, the board may require the grantee to repay all or a portion of the grant. 4. All applicants must indicate what other sources of funding have been considered to implement the project and explain why it is not possible to complete the project without State financial assistance. PRE-APPLICATION SCORING SYSTEM To be eligible for consideration by the Board, all applicants must: • State what other sources of funding have been considered by the, local units of government to implement the project and explain why it is not possible to complete the project without assistance from the Board. At its meeting on August 22, 1995, the Board approved a resolution informing all potential applicants that preference will be given to applications that: • propose an innovative idea for a cooperative planning, service budget management model, or service sharing pilot project. An innovative idea includes an activity which has not been previously funded by the Board and is not already being done within the state; • focus on the improved delivery of an existing public service, as opposed to applications that focus on new services or service enhancements; and • anticipate improved public service outcomes, and which incorporate a realistic method for measuring those improved outcomes. All eligible pre-applications will be evaluated using the following point scoring system. Points Criteria 15 The extent to which the pre-application demonstrates creative thinking and cooperation. 20 The extent to which the proposed project is likely to improve the quality of the service and to have benefits for other local governments. 20 The extent to which the pre-application reflects the statutory goal of the grant program. 15 The merit of the proposed project and the extent to which it warrants the state's financial participation. When considering the merit of the proposed project, the Board will focus on the extent to which the proposed project will improve service outcomes and the ability of the applicant to define how the improvement in service outcomes will be measured. MINNESOTA STATUTES RELATIVE TO THE COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAMS OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNMEN INNOVATION AND COOPERATION (As Amended By Laws Of Minnesota, 1995, Chapter 264, Article 8, Sections 4- 6) 465.798 SERVICE BUDGET MANAGEMENT MODEL GRANTS One or more local units of governments, an association of local governments, the metropolitan council, a local unit of government acting in conjunction with an organization or a state agency, or an organization established by two or more local units of government under a joint powers agreement may apply to the board of government innovation and management for a grant to-be-usermodels-fo—innovati-ve-ser-vice-budget-management.T-he-app-licatinn-to-the board must state what other sources of funding have been considered by the local units of government to implement the project and explain why it is not possible to complete the project. without assistance from the board. The board may not award a grant if it determines that the local units of government could complete the project without board assistance. A copy of the application must be provided by the units to the exclusive representatives certified under section 179A.12 to represent employees who provide the service or program affected by the application. Proposed models may provide options to local governments, neighborhood or community organizations, or individuals for managing budgets for service delivery. A copy of the work product for which the grant was provided must be furnished to the board upon completion, and the board may disseminate it to other local units of government or interested groups. If the board finds that the model was not completed or implemented according to the terms of the grant agreement, it may require the grantee to repay all or a portion of the grant. The board shall award grants on the basis of each qualified applicant's score under the scoring system in section 465.802. The amount of a grant under this section may not exceed$50,000. 465.799 COOPERATION PLANNING GRANTS Two or more local government units; an association of local governments; a local unit of government acting in conjunction with the metropolitan council, an organization, or a state agency; or an organization formed by two or more local units of government under a joint powers agreement may apply to the board of government innovation and cooperation for a grant to be used to develop a plan for intergovernmental cooperation in providing services. The application to the board must state what other sources of funding have been considered by the local units of government to implement the project and explain why it is not possible to complete the project without assistance from the board. The board may not award a grant if it determines that the local units of government could complete the project without board assistance. A copy of the application must be submitted by the'applicants to the exclusive representatives certified under section 179A.12 to represent employees who provide the service or program affected by the application. The plan may include model contracts or agreements to be used to implement the plan. A copy of the work product for which the grant was provided must be furnished to the board upon completion, and the board may disseminate it to other local units of government or interested groups. If the board finds that the grantee has failed to implement the plan according to the terms of the agreement, it may require the grantee to repay all or a portion of the grant. The board shall award grants on the basis of each qualified applicant's score under the scoring system in section 465.802. The amount of a grant under this section may not exceed $50,000. err®F REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 19. lir STAFF REPORT Report Number: 95-1481WS AGENDA SESSION DATE October 2, 1995 Report Date: 9-28-95 DISPOSITION Item Description: Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; Time is fast approaching for the annual Council/Staff Strategic Planning Work Session. Last year, the Session was held in January and seemed to work well for everyone. The Council may want to set dates this early so that we can confirm the dates that are convenient to us. Discussion also should take place as to the consultant that you want to conduct the 1996 Session. i Sama ha Or no, C'ty Administrator ti RECOMMENDATION; niOn OFREQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 1. oU��� STAFF REPORT Report Number: 95-14 h 5WS f AGENDA SESSION DATE October 2, 1995 Report Date: 9 28 95 DISPOSITION Item Description: Continued Discussion of Proposed Pedestrian Bridge Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary_(attach supplement sheets_as SUMMARY; Staff has been directed to identify possible funding sources for the City's share ($185,000) of a grant to construct a pedestrian bridge over Highway 10. Several potential sources are available. These sources shall be identified and some possible combinations of these funding sources shall be presented. It should be noted that, because there are several funding sources, numerous possible combinations of financing, beyond those that are presented within this memorandum, are possible. Property taxes are a possible funding source. The proposed 1996 levy of 6% raises an additional $97,625. Should the proposed 1996 levy be 3%, it raises an additional $49,828. Franchise fees are another possible funding source. The fund balance of the Franchise Fee Fund at December 31, 1994 was $47,905. That amount is a possible funding source. The 1995 Franchise Fee Fund Budget has allocated $152,341 to the General Fund. Estimated 1995 Franchise Fees of approximately $200,000 leave an excess of revenue over expenditures of$47,659 as a possible source of funds. Estimated 1996 Franchise Fees are projected to be 5% greater than 1995 Fees due to the possibility of an NSP rate increase and/or increased consumption. The proposed 1996 Budget has allocated $157,500 of Franchise Fees to the General Fund, leaving $52,500 as a possible funding source. I have been informed that street lighting will be required in connection with the project. Therefore, it would be appropriate to use Street Light Utility Funds. An amount of $20,000 from the fund has previously been suggested. The Recreation Activity Fund had a fund balance of $114,935 at December 31, 1994. I would recommend that 25% of 1996 estimated revenues ($224,365 x 25% = $56,100) be retained for working capital. That leaves $58,835 of recreation activity funds as a possible funding source. Undesignated Fund Balance of the General Fund at December 31, 1994 was $62,204. That amount is another possible funding source. RECOMMENDATION: Several financing options are presented below. Option No. 1 100% of remaining 1994 Franchise Fees $47,905 100% of remaining 1995 Franchise Fees $47,659 50% of unallocated 1996 Franchise Fees $26,250 50% of unallocated 1997 Franchise Fees $26,250 Street Light Utility Funds $20,000 Recreation Activity Funds $16,936 $185,000 Option No. 2 3% 1996 property tax increase $44,828 50% of remaining 1994 Franchise Fees $23,950 50% of remaining 1995 Franchise Fees $23,830 Street Light Utility Funds $20,000 100% of undesignated fund balance - General Fund $62,204 Recreation Activity Funds $10,188 $185,000 Option No. 3 75% of remaining 1994 Franchise Fees $35,928 50% of remaining 1995 Franchise Fees $23,830 50% of unallocated 1996 Franchise Fees $26,250 50% of unallocated 1997 Franchise Fees $26,250 Street Light Utility Funds $20,000 85% of undesignated fund balance - General Fund $52,742 $185,000 Option No. 4 100% of undesignated fund balance - General Fund $62,204 100% Available fund balance - Recreation Activity Fund $58,835 92% of remaining 1994 Franchise Fees $43,961 Street Light Utility Funds $20,000 $185,000 Donald Brager, Finance ' ector MILK nUNCIVIC NW' ItL I'1U .bi -( -UjJ Oct 02995 16 :29 P .01 • Pi)(frt./Yid/6 1/1 e LA) e, 44. /Co /ek. P /toe. :se -/ rge, e / -1-1 -/6 a- 40 1 t / M et,'" 6 ev te/Z DELIVERED TO COUNCIL AT OCTOBER 2, 1995 MEETING 1\LLIC ii I\CiVIC MDF ICL INU .01L 10U U3LO UCt UL ,`9b 1b :2y r .UL • To:Mounds View City Council Although my wife Vicky and myself are unablc.to attend tonights meeting regarding the pedestrian bridge we both Mt it was very important to fax the council a note supporting this matter. As parents of three boys who have friends on both sides of the highway we feel this project is of utmost importance from a safety point of view. It would allow easy and more importantly safe access to all of Mounds Vicw. The bridge would link the two sides of our city and help eliminate the division felt by many residents of the two sides. From our point of view there are numerous positives regarding this project and no negatives, This should not be a tough decisjon, Please do not risk losing the federal grant, Come up with a solution for di 20 percent that we need to spend to make this project a reality before we lose the federal grant and before someone else gets seriously hurt crossing Highway 10, Sinc. ely, `7/i;>>d/g`/://1.t r , Chia J7it{ .tum Rick and Vicky McKclvic 71t5-1060 10/02/95 06:57 CMO ROSEVILLE -, 612 784 3462 N0.015 D01 DELIVERED TO COUNCIL IN RED FOLDERS We the undersigned, believe Mounds View residents have the foresight to understand the need . for this bridge and the capacity to act . We urge you to communicate your opinion to council at this time by either att3nding this work session or faxing City Hall a letter . This is one issue in which your voice will make a difference . NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION IS MONDAY OCTOBER 2, 6:PM Mayor Jerry Linke . 78-6=4694 Council member Phyllis Blarnchard . . . . 784-2206P ewreni(j rew.::rens'Cerr-,sAriery' Council member Gary Quick 786-4631 • Council member Julie Trude 780-1854 Council member Sue Hankner 780_2635 city Hall Fax Number 784-3462 City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 , •ands Vie/ , 55112 1/ 1 �//,/,c- # / ` r ..)-;16k 4i#4,..:,_ fr‘r.,..1,.... , d, 4• ICS fa �.J,G�/n/Yt,L o1CJ�C �� e� J i -z_4 __-__. &Ltz. 1,s_kilLts.:›&)A-IN-A ) 41/c62:14:iaLle-t - C= 414'dC ceC(\--. IC: i.KCczt -A*--- _,.4` -e-,, /l .`-� ',>44 rte, . �. ,� 4a'`' c "tchzi O r , .,e.e,:o...e.,/e.-..e.._ ,..,'" ...e.e.::„,/z...2:::, - piley0a. l��rxti e D /i 4v44x4Gv7"rie / a-t!,,''� 4�e'' v 4sLep eSrreame, ,T,,,,,,... .9r: - ,L41. 4 gilt et/i-N --• OtAlg104-.k et(Q . , , I aP,,,,ki. , / 41 ` /' U e