Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1994/05/23 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL MAY 23, 1994 7:00 P.M. AGENDA The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by staff and appointed commissions, committees and boards. Decisions are based on this information, as well as City policy and practices, input from constituents and a Councilmember's personal judgement. If you have comments, questions or information regarding an item on the agenda, please step forward to be recognized by the Mayor during the "Residents Requests and Comments From the Floor" item on the agenda. Please state your name and address for the record. All comments are appreciated. A copy of all printed materials relating to the agenda item is available for public inspection at the Recording Secretary's Table. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL - Linke Wuori Blanchard Trude Quick 4. Additions to Agenda: Item 1: Item 2: Item 3: AGENDA PAGE TWO MAY 23, 1994 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Date: May 9, 1994 Regular Meeting COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 6. ACCEPTANCE OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES: COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 7. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Kurt Johnson, Golf Course Superintendent (Mary Saarion, Director of Parks, Recreation and Forestry) COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 8. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Set Public Hearings for On\Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Wine Sales License Renewals for June 27 as follows: - 7:05 p.m., Bei-Rae Ballroom 5394 Edgewood Drive On-Sale Wine - 7:06 p.m., Budget Liquor 2577 Highway 10 Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor AGENDA PAGE THREE MAY 23, 1994 7:07 p.m., D & R Liquor Bottle Shop 2345 County Road H-2 Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor - 7:08 p.m, Murzyn Liquors 2840 Highway 10 Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor - 7:09 p.m., Robert's Off 10 2400 County Road H-2 On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor - 7:10 p.m., Donatelle's Supper Club 2400 Highway 10 On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor - 7:11 p.m., Mermaid Cocktail Lounge 2200 Highway 10 On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor B. Set Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m, Monday, June 13, 1994, to Consider Revisions to the Surface Water Management Plan Staff Report No. 94-1174C C. Adopt Resolution No. 4571 Approving a Charitable Gambling License for a One-Day, Off-Site Lawful Gambling Permit, Staff Report No. 94-1175C D. Adopt Resolution No. 4569, Reapportionment, Auditor's No. 0431, Division No. DL064747, Greenfield Plat 2 (Sanitary Sewer), Staff Report No. 94-1176C E. Adopt Resolution No. 4570 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds F. Licenses for Approval General Commercial - Expires 6/30/94 Perkins Family Restaurant Operating Co. - New Sewer/Water - Expires 6/30/94 Blaylock Plumbing Company - New AGENDA PAGE FOUR MAY 23, 1994 Items Removed: COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 9. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR Citizens' comments are encouraged to allow individual citizens to address the Council, as a whole, on a matter of interest or concern to the citizens. The preservation of the Citizens' Comments item on the agenda is important in order to encourage and maintain this information flow. To preserve and protect this valuable communications link, a speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:05 p.m. Consider Development Proposal of the Westminster Corporation (Senior Housing), Staff Report No. 94-1177C, (Staff Presenter: Paul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator) a. Consideration of Resolution No. 4572 Approving the Development Review of the Westminster Senior Housing Project COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: AGENDA PAGE FIVE MAY 23, 1994 7:10 p.m. Consideration of the Development Review for C. G. Hill, Staff Report No. 94-1178C (Staff Presenter: Paul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator) a. Consideration of Resolution No. 4573 Approving the Development Review for C. G. Hill COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: b. Consideration of Resolution No. 4574 Approving the Final Plat of Mounds View Business Park East Building M Addition COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 7:15 p.m. Consideration of Development Proposal for Multi-Tech, Staff Report No. 94-1179C (Staff Presenter: Paul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator) a. Consideration of Resolution No. 4575 Approving the Development Review Multi Tech COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: b. Consideration of Resolution No. 4576 Approving the Final Plat of Mounds View Business Park West Addition COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: AGENDA PAGE SIX MAY 23, 1994 11. COUNCIL BUSINESS: Consent Agenda Item(s) Brought Forward: • COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: A. Consideration of Adoption of Ordinance No. 538 Amending Appendix A, "Specific Rezonings", of the Mounds View Municipal Code (Staff Presenter: Paul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator) ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor Linke Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Wuori Councilmember Quick Councilmember Trude B. Consideration of Adoption of Ordinance No. 539 Amending Appendix A, "Specific Rezonings", of the Mounds View Municipal Code, (Staff Presenter: Paul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator) ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor Linke Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Wuori Councilmember Quick Councilmember Trude COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: AGENDA PAGE SEVEN MAY 23, 1994 C. Consideration of Adoption of Ordinance No. 537 Amending Appendix A, "Specific Rezonings" of the Mounds View Municipal Code (Staff Presenter: Paul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator) ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor Linke Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Wuori Councilmember Quick Councilmember Trude COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: D. Consideration and Formal Introduction of Ordinance No. 540 Prohibiting Parking On Bronson Drive Between Edgewood Drive and Jackson Drive, Staff Report No. 94-1180C (Staff Presenter: Paul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator) COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: E. Consideration of Approval of Final Payment to Mikkelson-Wulff Construction Company, Contractor for City Hall Improvement Project, Staff Report No. 94-1181C, (Staff Presenter: Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator) COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: AGENDA PAGE EIGHT MAY 23, 1994 12. REPORTS: 1. Report of Councilmembers: Quick: Blanchard Wuori: Trude: 2. Report of Mayor Linke: 3. Report of Administrator: 4. Report of Staff: 5. Report of Attorney: NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION: JUNE 6, 1994 NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: JUNE 13, 1994 12. ADJOURNMENT: cry o t. C� yor ritri ,, 0UNDS- Phone: (612) 784-3362 e f fiez of ttiE city cAiminithzatoz Phone: (612) 784-3055 EW SAMANTHA ORDUNO Fax: (612) 784-3462 "Quite Simply the Best" MEMORANDUM TO: EDA PRESIDENT AND COMMISSIONERS DATE: MAY 19, 1994 - - RE: DEVELOPMENT FEES ASSOCIATED WITH THE MSP/WESTMINSTER SILVER LAKE POINT SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT I present the following information in a memo separate from the EDA agenda because I want it to be an informational item that may or may not become a serious item of consideration. When MSP and Westminster approached the City in February of this ' year, one of their requests was that "the City defer all fees associated with building permits, zoning approvals, TIF approvals, etc. until construction loan closing" . Paul Harrington has had interactions with MSP informing them of the potential development costs for this project, i.e. ; WAC/SAC charges, building permit fees, etc. To date, the City has incurred legal costs associated with this project - drafting the Development Agreement, meetings and review of the proposal. It is common practice among cities to absorb such costs if the project proceeds. Some cities require a cash deposit prior to any development discussions to defray the legal and - administrative costs should the project not proceed. Discussions that I have had with MSP (Jeff Huggett and Milo Pinkerton) have centered on the City's position that all associated development fees (building permit, WAC/SAC, review) will be deferred until closing as the City has had few costs to this point. The issue arises as to the City's position regarding absorption of legal fees should the project not proceed. The City can absorb the fees and pay them from TIF funds or require the developer to reimburse the City for these costs. Jim Thomson has drafted an agreement which could address the issue of development fees. I have attached the draft to this memo. I present this issue for purpose of discussion in connection with the consideration of the Development Agreement which will take place next Monday night. I believe it prudent for the issue of fees to be addressed at the meeting, so that there is not misunderstanding as to what fees will be paid at what time. From 6 .PRINTED WITH SOYINK 2401 Highway10 • Mounds View, MN 5511 - 21499 recycled paper the attached letter, it is unclear that MSP has an understanding that there are certain fees (i.e. , building, WAC/SAC and others) which are not traditionally (if ever) waived. The issue of reimbursement of legal fees is a policy issue that staff requests Council consideration and direction. I think that whatever is decided, it is important to establish guidelines/policy so that every developer is treated uniformly and is aware of the process at the initial stage of development consideration. 94/14/1994 13:46 612-336-4565 MSP PAGE 02 lay I � ilI +' • 't' 4' r • 4 "�h. ?y . i. s ; ,Sys �. ik.:.a r;l MSP real estate services inc February 2, 1994 Ms. Samantha Orduno City Manager City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 RE: SENIOR HOUSING MOUNDS VIEW, MN Dear Samantha: Enclosed is the information you have requested that we submit with our application for TIF funding and our Planned Unit Development: 1. ) PUD Application 2.) Resume / Track Record of Developer 3 . ) Site Plan of Proposed Project 4. ) Project Description 5. ) Preliminary Financial Projections REQUEST Our request to the City of Mounds View is 4-fold: 1. ) We request that the city approve our PUD plan to build an 80-unit, 3-story senior apartment building as outlined in the enclosed' site plan. The PUD would be conditioned upon the project obtaining adequate TIF funding, tax credits and debt financing. If said financing is inadequate, the zoning would revert to its existing classification. 2 . ) We request that the city grant this project 15 years of "pay-as-you-go" TIF funding in an amount equal to 90% of the tax increment generated from the proposed project. The 15 years would commence once the property is fully assessed for real estate taxes, and the precise amount of TIF funding to the project would be determined once real estate taxes have been established. 04/14/1994 13:46 612-336-4565 MSP PAGE 03 111111 13. ) We request that the city defer all fees associated with building permits, zoning approvals, TIF approvals, etc. until construction loan closing. 4 . ) We request that the city enter into an exclusive Development Agreement with Westminster and MSP to build this project. mom= The project will be an 80-unit apartment community available exclusively for seniors 62 years of age and over. We plan to locate this property on a 2.7-acre parcel on County Road I and Mounds View Drive, just south of Highway 10. The property will be an attractive 3-story elevatored building with underground parking. There will be ample common space including a large community room with full kitchen, crafts room, and library. The building will be super energy efficient meeting or exceeding State of Minnesota energy guidelines and will be constructed with a low maintenance exterior. The project will be functionally efficient for seniors' needs and aesthetically appealing. The project also has an ideal location that is within walking distance of parks, drug stores, other convenience retail stores, and public transportation. DEVZLOPBR The developer will be a joint venture between Westminster Corporation and MSP Real Estate, Inc. Westminster Corporation is a non-profit corporation whose mission is to provide affordable housing for people with low incomes. Westminster has a 20-year track record of providing over 2600 units of affordable housing to Minnesota residents. Westminster will act as co-developer, property manager, and coordinator of services to residents. MSP Real Estate, Inc. is a development and construction firm specializing in affordable housing. Milo Pinkerton, the President of M$P, has been involved in the development and construction of over 600 units of affordable housing. Since its inception in 1988, MSP has completed approximately 170 units of multi-family rental housing specifically targeted to seniors. HSP'S construction company is headed by an individual with over 20 years of construction experience, including over 2100 multi-family units. MSP will be co-developer and general contractor for this apartment project. FINANCING In order to provide a high quality rental housing community that is affordable to Mounds View's seniors, we need to assemble a layered financing package that includes conventional mortgage loans, equity raised from tax credits, and "pay-as-you-go" TIF assistance from the City. The TIF assistance is critical to enabling this project to access adequate debt and equity capital to make this project both feasible and affordable. 05/1611994 13:22 612-336-4565 MSP PAGE 01 Mk. 3.^ a. '� �i.�}.; 'pV:741.147— �'+{��+ `! 41��y�j��..F ..y}r��,':Vrrt7 . .. ',,�iyy; ?LL�1 �. `71�. ' • •yt:.n.+n. 4'.'�. .J1'4�1a"'•":.�'-f�: S►'�.A�r ►•ac �R •lf MSP real estateservices ! 11 c . May 18, 1994 Ms. Samantha OrdunO VIA FAX: 784-3482 City Administrator CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 RE: 83-Unit Seniors Housing Mounds View, MN Dear Samantha: Thank you for conveying the Council's feedback relative to the draft of the Development Agreement. We have instructed Todd Urness to forward our comments on to Jim O'Meara. As we have discussed previously, it has always been our position that neither MSP nor Westminster would be liable for any fees payable to the City or its attorneys, engineers, etc., should the above-referenced project proceed to a closing. We are working diligently so that this project will, in fact, be built. Our companies have spent considerable time and money and will spend more money in the next few months. I hope we can proceed diligently to ensure the success of this project. Sincerely, Milo Pinkerton President MP/mb 01/26/94 11:55 FAX 612 784 3462 CITY OF MV Cj001 *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 6775 CONNECTION TEL 3364565 CONNECTION ID START TIME 01/26 11:53 USAGE TIME 01'17 PAGES 3 RESULT OK J` CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA 55112-1499 Iii N )S PHONE: (612) 7843055 FAX NO. 7843462 • LSYN • FAX TRANSMITTAL FORM Please deliver the following pages to: NAME --FE .r uGfC FAX# 3 3"6 - 45-6 5- LOCATION FROM: „v-l�,a.✓ DATE: / Z ? TIME / -41”" COMMENTS/MESSAGE: MEMORANDUM TO: JEFFEREY HUGGETT FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, MOUNDS VIEW CITY PLANNER, DATE: January 26, 1994 SUBJECT: APPLICABLE PERMIT FEES - SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT As we discussed yesterday, the following are the applicable permit fees associated with the proposed senior housing project. Please note that all fees are approximations and are based on a three story, 80 unit facility (27, 500 sq. ft. footprint) : Building Permit $ 14,200 Plan Check $ 9,200 Surcharge $ 2, 000 Storm Water Management Fee $ 4, 000 SAC* $ 64, 000 (80 units @ $800) WAC $ 18, 000 (80 units @ $225) Sewer Permit $ 50 Water Permit $ 50 Unit Charge $ 100 TOTAL** $ 111, 600 * Reduction in SAC may be available from MWCC based on: - Units using common laundry facilities -- 20% fee reduction - Low/moderate rental rates -- 25% fee reduction ** Total does not include permit fees for mechanical, plumbing or electrical MEMORANDUM TO: JEFFEREY HUGGETT FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, MOUNDS VIEW CITY PLANNER V'C DATE: January 26, 1994 SUBJECT: REQUIRED SUBMITTALS FOR SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT As part of the land use review process, the Mounds View Planning Commission and City Council require the following items to be included for consideration: SITE PLAN showing all proposed developed on the project site. LANDSCAPE PLAN showing location of proposed green areas and ideas for trees, shrubs, etc. This may be included on the Site Plan. DRAINAGE PLAN, prepared by a professional engineer, showing the proposed storm water run-off control measures to be incorporated on the site. NARRATIVE explaining the request in detail. If you have any questions, or require any further information, please do not hesitate to give me a call. - y HOLMES & GRAVEN CHARTERED Attorneys at Law 470 Pillsbury Center,Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402 ROBERT A.ALSOP (612)337-9300 ROBERT C.LONG RONALD H.BATTY LAURA K.MOLLET STEPHEN J.BUBUL Facsimile(612)337-9310 BARBARA L.PORTWOOD JOHN B.DEAN JAMES M.STROMMEN MARY G.DOBBINS JAMES J.THOMSON,JR. STEFANIE N.GALEY LARRY M.WERTHEIM CORRINE A.HEINE BONNIE L.WILKINS JAMES S.HOLMES WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL GARY P.WINTER DAVID J.KENNEDY DAVID L.GRAVEN(19294991) JOHN R.LARSON 337-9209 WELLINGTON H.LAW VIA RAPIFAX AND MAIL OF COUNSEL CHARLES L.LEFEVERE ROBERT C.CARLSON JOHN M.LEFEVRE,JR. ROBERT L.DAVIDSON ROBERT J.LINDALL T.JAY SALMEN February 21, 1994 Paul Harrington _ City Planner City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 <?1, t0c Dear Paul: You requested assistance regarding the proper method to follow when an applicant requests deferral of payment of city fees for processing rezoning, building permits and similar applications. I have prepared and enclose a proposed form for your use. It will need to be modified on a case-by-case basis, but it should give you a good starting point. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, J- - Thomson JJT:jes Enclosure JJT 66018 MU125-14 • 4 AGREEMENT RE DEFERRAL OF FEE PAYMENT The undersigned ("Applicant") has applied to the City of Mounds View "City") for inner spec f c ty of app cat n that zs bei sub bulldiA permit: ..rezonin , etc:.<]. ......... ... ..... As part of the application process, the Applicant has requested that the City defer payment of fees to the City for the processing of the above-referenced applications. The City has consented to the deferral of payment of such fees provided that the Applicant acknowledge that it will be ultimately responsible for the payment of those fees and any costs, expenses or attorneys' fees incurred by the City in collecting payment of those fees. In consideration of the City deferring the payment of such fees, the Applicant agrees as follows: 1. The Applicant acknowledges that it is responsible for the payment of t sertspec c:typ of fees and further understands that the approximate amount of those fees are insert dollar mour3ts for fecal . 2. The Applicant acknowledges responsibility for the payment of the above fees and any other fees reasonably incurred by the City in processing the application. 3. The Applicant will pay all fees reasonably incurred by the City within 10 days after a written request by the City for payment. 4. If the Applicant fails to pay the fees within the time period specified above, the Applicant will be responsible for all costs and fees incurred by the City, including City staff time and attorneys' fees, incurred by the City in collecting the fees. Dated: Insert Applicant's name If Applicant is a corporat o ,:: :agr em t should also be signed b its pr icipal effacer a .>: aeholde11 ,. . ......................... JJT66020 MU125-14 t .. TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: SAMANTHA ORDUNO, CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE: MAY 19, 1994 RE: INDEX FOR WEEK OF MAY 23, 1994- COUNCIL MEETING MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF MAY 23, 1994 . EDA Work Session, Monday, May 23, 1994, 6:00 p.m. . Council Meeting, Monday, May 23, 1994, 7:00 p.m. . EDA Public Hearing, Monday, May 23, 1994, Immediately Following the City Council Meeting ITEMS PROVIDED IN THIS WEEK'S COUNCIL PACKET . This Is It! . Agenda . Approved Minutes, April 25, 1994, Regular Meeting . Unapproved Minutes, May 9, 1994, Regular Meeting ****************** ADMINISTRATOR'S SCHEDULE (Please note that this schedule is subject to change as meetings are scheduled, rescheduled or canceled. At any time Audrey, Michele, or Tim_ C. will have my most current schedule and a number where I can be reached at all times . ) Monday, May 23 9:30 a.m. Reception for Kurt Johnson 12:30 Luncheon Meeting with Park and Recreation 6:00 p.m. EDA Work Session 7:00 p.m. Council Meeting EDA Meeting Immediately Following the Council Meeting MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE TWO MAY 23, 1994 Tuesday, May 24 9:00 a.m. Meeting with MWCC 11 :00- 6:00 Interview for Code Enforcement Officer Wednesday, May 25 Thursday, May 26 9:00 a.m. - LMC Legislative Update 5:00 p.m. Friday, May 27 ISIT . . a . For the Week of May 16 - May 20, 1994 ADMINISTRATION MWCC Meeting On Tuesday of this week staff and the golf course architects met with representatives of the MWCC to discuss the Blaine Interceptor Project and its impact on the City's golf course. It was at this meeting that staff learned that the MWCC planned to begin the interceptor project south of Hwy 118 and move north of 118 sometime in July. To say that this schedule is detrimental to our golf course construction schedule is an understatement of monumental proportion. The MWCC also stated that it was not their intent to restore the golf course site to anything other than the way it was when they bid the project even though the condition of the section of the course they would be working on is vastly different than existed earlier in the year. To add insult to injury they also had no intention of replacing the many trees they would be removing on the golf course site. Their attitude at the start of the meeting was one of benign neglect of the City's interests and a failure to realize the importance of our project schedule. Representative Geri Evans arrived at the meeting about 45 minutes into the meeting and immediately the position of the MWCC group changed from an attitude of "this is the way it is going to be" to "conditions have changed and it is possible to work out the problems that have been identified." MWCC admitted that the soil borings conducted on property south of 118 had delayed the project 2 months. Our position is that the MWCC project has already delayed our construction schedule in that the contractor cannot proceed in the sequence which is optimum for completion of the course. We conveyed to the MWCC representatives that our construction schedule has not changed, but theirs had and that change negatively impacted our course. Our schedule dictates that the seeding must occur no later than August 31st. Any delays in that timeline will delay the opening beyond the anticipated July 4 weekend and reduce anticipated season revenues. Consequently, the MWCC must complete their work on our site no later than July 31st. The result of the meeting was an agreement of MWCC to meet with their principle parties and discuss alternatives to their current construction schedule. We have scheduled another meeting for next Tuesday, 9:00 a.m. at City Hall. Andover Landfill The Governor signed the bill which created a State funding mechanism to clean up the already identified closed landfills in Minnesota. This is very good news for the City for two reasons: (1) it means that the WDE group has another recourse to clean up the Andover site and will not initiate a third party lawsuit against the City; and (2) there is a provision in the law which provides for reimbursement for past payments for landfill clean up. The City more than likely will be reimbursed for the money already contributed to the Oak Grove Trust. I have included in this issue of This Is It a copy of the letter from the law firm representing the WDE Andover group. I expect to hear from them prior to the June 6th Work Session and will present additional information at that time regarding the group's decision to participate or not participate in the state program. Ethics Law One of the results of the 1994 Legislative Session was the passage of the Ethics Law and the extension of its restrictions to all public employees. Effective August 1, 1994, it will be a gross misdemeanor for any public employee/official to accept any gift from any individual, company or institutional entity that in any way has business with the employee's governmental group. That gift could be as incidental as a cup of coffee. I have asked the LMC staff to provide us with an opinion as to the City's position regarding donations of items for the Community Appreciation Dinner. Samantha Economic Development Attraction Requests: I received three requests this week for companies interested in retail and commercial space. The first two requests came to the City from the Metro East Development Partnership and the third from Everest Development. 1. An up and coming biopharmaceutical company is looking for a 40,000 s.f. site for their corporate headquarters. This would be an excellent company to attract to Mounds View but competition is fierce. I have asked for proposals from both Everest Development and Watson Investments and will submit them with a cover letter from the City. The letter will relay a strong interest to assist with the location of the company using Tax Increment Financing. I will discuss this matter at the EDA work session on Monday. 2. An out of state restaurant is looking to tap the Midwest market specifically in the St. Paul metro area. I have forward this request to Paster Enterprises for potential location in Mounds View Square. They were especially interested in a high traffic area which is suitable for the Highway 10 corridor. 3. Everest Development is working with a St. Paul-area company looking to lease 60,000-70,000 s.f. build-to-suit office\production\warehouse space. Everest is interested in securing TIF funds to construct the building for this company. They are in the preliminary stages and will come to us with a proposal at a later date. Retention Efforts: I met with Edward Paster of Paster Enterprises this week. They are signing a lease with Mario's Movies and Games for the south west corner of Mounds View Square. The Planning Commission will be reviewing their sign proposal this week. In addition, as you can see, Mounds View Square is having a mini carnival this week through Sunday. Paul and I met with Wolf & Associates regarding expansion this week. Wolf & Associates would like to reconfigure their building to alleviate the disturbance to the manufactured home park to the south of the facility and have presented a design that would fit both their expansion and the needs of the residents. I will discuss their proposed concept at the EDA work session. I will be meeting with Community Resource Partnerships this week to review the survey questionnaire and discuss the schedule for the Community Partnership Program. In addition, the Governor signed the legislation, submitted by Representative Geri Evans, appropriating funds for a $35,000 matching grant for Mounds View and New Brighton to participate in the North Metro Business Retention and Expansion Program. Outreach: Jennifer and I attended the Community Reinvestment Fund (CRF) Minnesota Campaign Kick-Off. CRF has secured a $3 million grant which will allow them to leverage $15 million to assist community development lenders access the secondary market plus provide a whole host of other services. This program could be extremely beneficial to the City once we set up revolving loan funds and housing programs. I am taking Deborah Barkley, Manager of Business Development from Metro East Development Partnership (MEDP), for a tour of the City on Friday. She is specifically interested in the Mounds View Business Park and other potential sites for commercial and industrial expansion. Also, I will show her the golf course site and our beautiful parks. MEDP can be a tremendous asset in selling Mounds View to potential prospects. Marketing Efforts: I am still working on Mounds View's Community Profile. I have collected and entered most of the data and will begin design concept next week. Cathy Golf Course Superintendent On Monday, May 23, Kurt Johnson, the new Golf Course Superintendent, will begin. He will be welcomed aboard with an all staff reception at 9:30 and will be meeting with the City Departments throughout the course of the day. Kurt will also be present at Monday's Council meeting to meet the Council members and introduced to the Community. Planning Associate/Code Enforcement Officer Position The City has received 41 applications for the Planning Associate/Code Enforcement Officer position. 9 candidates will be interviewed on Tuesday, May 24. The interview panel will consist of Council member Trude, Samantha, Paul and myself. Additional City Hall Improvements The landscape work has begun and is scheduled to be completed by the end of the week. They have sodded the West side of the building, put up a keystone wall in the front of City Hall and have done some rough grading. The door stops with holders have also been installed so now we don't have to prop open our doors with pieces of carpet and wooden wedges. Electricity has been run to the shelter nearest City Hall to accommodate needs for Festival in the Park and picnickers. Carpentry work (building a minute room in the copier room, finishing off the storage area downstairs and enclosing the electrical panels in the new women's rest room downstairs) was suppose to begin this week but the carpenter fell ill. On Friday (5/20), the floor surfacing company will be out again to attempt to better match the existing color of the floor surface to the surface they recently completed. Faircon, the HVAC service company, was out on Wednesday and repaired the air conditioning unit in the Council Chambers. This should take care of that hideous squealing noise. Annual City Manager Conference Samantha and I were at Cragun's last Wednesday, Thursday and Friday for the annual City Managers Conference. The speakers were good and the weather even better. I literally tore up the golf course. They should sell grounds repair insurance. Liquor License Meeting In response to Ed Donetelle's request to the Council for the City to reexamine the liquor license fee structure for on-sale with cabaret, a meeting was called and held at Donetelle's. Ed was present along with Charlie Hall of the Mermaid and Bob Waste of Roberts off 10. Cathy Bennett and I listened to their concerns and possible policy options. The options discussed were 1) leave the fee structure as is ($5,000 + $85/100 sq. ft. of public area in excess of 4,000 sq. ft. not to exceed $10,000/yr.); 2) base the fee on the number of police calls made annually; 3) base the fee on volume of liquor sold or gross receipts of liquor sales; 4) base fee on sq. footage of area where liquor is served and area where food and liquor are served; and 5) a combination of all of the above. These options will be brought to the June work session for Council consideration and discussion. Tim C. PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY PARKS: * Already Steve has had to repair the Hustler mower and the Howard Price. Again, these two mowers are up for replacement in 1995. We just need to get through this summer - they are very tired machines. * Jeff has been on the mowers almost constantly trying to keep up with the grass. Three of the four seasonals will begin work towards the end of next week. They will be warmly welcomed and much appreciated! • The resurfacing of Groveland Park tennis courts was scheduled for last week, but the company was delayed with a project in Eagan. Therefore the schedule has been postponed for work to be done towards the end of this week and possibly into the weekend. * We have received a complaint of softballs hitting two manor homes which are located directly behind Silver View field #2 left field and field #1 right field. These two homes are in the line of homeruns which occur when the wind is strong northeast wind which carries long ball hits. The wind blown softballs evidently hit the berm and skim off hitting the side of their home. Pine trees have been planted on the berm in hopes of offering a natural deflection buffer, but obviously it has not been successful. This issue will be on the agenda of the June Work Session. Staff has requested costs of higher fencing and netting options. Until that time we have hired a person to sit on the berm and catch any long homeruns that go over the fence before they land so that they do not skim off the berm hitting the sides of their homes - as a security measure for their home. RECREATION: * Most youth athletic practices will begin next week. All the equipment, t-shirts, manuals, schedules, and first aid supplies have been distributed. All but 6 coaches have attended the Coaches Clinic. Mary will be holding the last coaches clinic this Saturday. * Silver View Park has been reserved for just about every weekend of the summer already! This is a very popular picnicking facility in the City. Oh how gorgeous Silver View Park is now during this blossom time! * The Garden Club will be planting the bushes and flowers at City Hall this weekend (May 20-21) They put a lot of energy into this project and they do a nice job. * MVCT auditions are June 7, 8, and 9th. The artistic staff has been hired. FORESTRY: * Tree locations have been marked for planting at City Hall (8 trees near the ballfield near the backstop area) Silver View (5 trees at the County Rd H2 side) Lambert Park (2 trees to replace boulevard trees) and Greenfield ( 4 trees, 2 in the parking lot islands and 2 near the playground area). These trees are all acquired through the Small Business grant received in 1993. In addition, Rick has 25 trees to be planted along Long Lake Road funded through MSA. CABLE TV * Jerry is still waiting for the last of the equipment for the Council Chambers podium, projector system. The carpenter is finishing the podium and hopefully it will be here within a week. A part of the Cable TV control room furniture has arrived, he is waiting for the rest of it so that he can organize the control room. GOLF COURSE UPDATE This morning I met Paul Miller and Golf Course Superintendant Kurt Johnson to review the progress of the golf course and to orientate Kurt to the development. Decisions were made regarding removal of some trees on the practice range. The location of buildings, sequence of tasks to be completed on the course construction and work that Kurt and summer help can begin was also discussed. Blaine is requiring the parking lot be curb, gutter and paved. In addition special requirements for the fuel tank must be adhered to in compliance to Blaines' direction. While we were out on location we met with both construction supervisor's, Dick and Randy to confirm other details regarding parking lot drainage. Veit Construction is moving along at a fast clip. If it weren't for the Blaine Interceptor project glitch, the course could be ready for irrigation and seeding within 2-3 weeks. The building plans have been accepted by Blaine with some added requirements ie. the parking lot improvements and fuel tank location. Ebert Const. will be obtaining permits and scheduling work to begin soon. A delay of two weeks is anticipated because of the delay of permits and plan review and contract review. This should not pose a problem although Kurt would like a building to work from as soon as possible as we all can understand. A second meeting with the MWCC will be held Tuesday, May 24. Hopefully a more definite timeline for the interceptor work will be provided so that we know where we stand regarding Veit's construction progress and anticipated timeline. Kurt begins work May 23, at which time he will be orientated to each department. Tuesday he will begin with the MWCC meeting and proceed to begin tasks of handwork along the ditches, trimming the pine tree stands, attending the installation of the irrigation and well to orientate himself with the mechanisms. Kurt will need to request bids for fuel tank and maintenance equipment. Kurt will be working part time on location and part time in the Parks and Recreation Office. Kurt will be responsible for keeping a chronological report of the golf course project with pictures and videos. Mary S. FINANCE • The City continues to have good claims experience on workers compensation insurance. The Workers Compensation Rating Bureau has lowered our experience modification from .83 to .75. This means that the City will be charged 75% of standard rates for our workers compensation insurance. • The City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR) is finally completed! Included in your packet is a CAFR, Auditor's Management Report, and a report entitled, Federal Financial Assistance. The latter report is required when the City receives more than $25,000 in federal grants in any one year. The auditors will present their management report at the June 6, 1994 Agenda Session. Don POLICE 1. You may of heard that a little girl. was hit by a car near Oakwood Park last Thursday. At this time, her condition is getting better and - she is expected to recover. 2. Two officers (Johnson & Koopmeiners) attended a "Narcotics for Street Officers" Training seminar. 3. One of two new squads is "in service". The other is expected to be on the road today. We (Pitts & Baumgart) will be taking the old squads and converting them to a CSO vehicle and an unmarked. 4. The Chief was off Monday & Tuesday of this week chasing the wiley Walleye. Also on a personal note, son Robb signed a letter of intent to attend Purdue University. 5. Our computer was down most of the weekend and on Monday. Repairs were made and its working fine at this moment. Tim R. PUBLIC WORKS * Tim Pittman and Tom Baumgart continue to work on setting up the new squad car. The first one was put into service last week. Some new lights and additional features were utilized in these units, and they have been very well received. We don't know how well Tom is going to adjust to going back on patrol though. The Public Works atmosphere that he has been in will obviously benefit him. * The spring hydrant flushing program went smoothly (but then I was out of town) this year. Less time and water were needed to clean up the mains. The crew started on Sunday by turning valves, and finish up on Wednesday. Approximately 4 million gallons of water were used. * On Monday night the City had a water main break at the Greenfield Ponds Addition. It was caused by an excavator driving over the water main while performing a minor ditch cleaning effort. This was not the City's operator or equipment, it was JMS Construction performing clean up of the ditch and pond as per a punch list item. They have been informed that the repair is their responsibility and they will be billed for the 1.3 million gallons of water that was lost. Kathryn Harstad has also been reminded that the final completion date for the project is July 1, 1994, at which time the City will use the cash deposit of $ 75,000 to finish the work. * Final inspection and punch lists will be conducted this week on the two water treatment plants. Things are running very smoothly, with good quality results. * Larry and Wally are working to clean the storm sewer on Greenfield Place that runs into the swap, (ditch) in Greenfield Park. They have found a vast amount of roots in some of the first joints, blocking any cleaning efforts. A root cutter for that size pipe is in route. * The MPWA spring conference was very informative, with this year's topic of customer service. The weather also cooperated. * Crack sealing of various streets will begin next week. * I just received a report from MWCC with our first quarter billing amount. It was 122 million gallons, up by nearly 7 million gallons. I would also like to note that our two lift stations are operating more than previous years also. I am going to do some quick research into what other cities are doing about sump pumps discharging into the sanitary sewer. I believe that our ordinance does not allow this and can require an inspection of the building to verify compliance. Mike COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE ENFORCEMENT CALLS Staff has been receiving a very high number of code enforcement calls within the past month in response to the article on nuisance abatement which appeared in the City Newsletter. Because of the large volume of calls, Staff has had to begin devoting Friday's full-time to code enforcement activities. The system seems to be working o.k. and, the residents are satisfied with their concerns being addressed within a week, however, Staff will be extremely happy when the Code Enforcement Officer/Planning Associate is on-board. WOLF AND ASSOCIATES POTENTIAL EXPANSION City Staff met with representatives of Wolf and Associates to discuss their preliminary plans for an expansion of their facilities on Mustang Circle in the Industrial Park. The plan calls for an expansion of the fabricating and shipping areas of the facility in order to make the entire operation more efficient. Staff was given a tour of the existing facility and had a chance to discuss some concerns that had been raised by the residents of Townsedge Terrace regarding the operation of the facility. Wolf and Associates seemed eager to not only begin the process of City review of the project but, also, to address those concerns of the manufactured home park. Paul H. Summary Field Report Project: Mounds View Golf Links and Practice Center Owner: City of Mounds View Contractor: Veit Companies Field Report No.: 8 Date of Report: May 11, 1994 Date of Site Visit: May 10, 1994 Prepared by: Williams, Gill & Associates, Golf Course Architects 421 North Main Street, River Falls, WI 54022 Phone (715) 425-9511 Prepared for: City'of Mounds View, Mary Saarion - Project Manager Present at Site: Mary Saarion, City of Mounds View Garrett Gill, Williams, Gill & Associates (WGA) Paul Miller, Williams, Gill & Associates Randy Dryden, Veit Companies Ralph, Veit Companies Weather: high 60's, sunny Work in progress: draining pond B, grading on no. 1, topsoil stripping on driving range General Comments: Mary, Garrett, Paul and Randy walked the majority of the site to familiarize Mary with the work that had been done to date. Garrett again talked to Randy about sequencing of the finish work. Garrett relayed to Randy that he thinks Veit should finish the range, holes 1, 6, 7, 8, and 9 and then finish holes 2, 3, 4 and 5. Randy stated that the work that is being finished on holes 2, 3, 4, and 5 is only what needs to be done to balance the grading on that side. Randy was informed that a meeting with the Blaine Interceptor contractor will be anaz 17 at 9:00 a.m. May Discussed catch basin installation with Randy re: grouting of pipe, depth of pipe / catch basins and erosion control measures. Discussed with Randy and Ralph the finish shaping of the mounds. Reviewed trail connection behind range with Mary. 1 Williams, Gill & Associates, Golf Course Architects Directions to Contractor: 1. Remove two trees that had been marked to save along the ditch near the bridge crossing. Grade as necessary near no. 1 forward tee to save the two existing trees. Relocate the bridge crossing from the clubhouse to no. 1 tees - centered between back tee and back of middle tee. 2. Remove approximately 5 trees to the left of no. 8 fairway (poplars).. 3. WGA will look at a revised tee location for no. 7 tee to save the existing ash tree. 4. Mentioned to Randy that he should coordinate the utility connections to the buildings with the building contractor. Respectfully yours, Paul Miller, of Course Architect cc: Randy Dryden, Veit Companies Jerry Rachel, Veit Companies Note: Please make corrections or additions below and return to Williams, Gill so that this report may be amended. " LL- 2 Williams, Gill & Associates, Golf Course Architects REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ReportNumber: Section: 8.D ^ Q Report Number: 94-1176C STAFF REPORT Report Date: 5-19-94 ;�, Council Action: 0 Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE May 23, 1994 0 Public Hearings Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Adopt Resolution No. 4569, Reapportionment, Auditor's No. 0431, Division No. DL064747, Greenfield Plat 2 (Sanitary Sewer) Administrator's Review/Recommendation: /- - No comments to supplement this rep rt - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; The City of Mounds View has received a request from Ramsey County to apportion the assessments for two properties located along County Road I. The total square footage of the properties has been reduced due to the recent widening of County Road I, and thus new PIN numbers have been given to the properties. Attached is Resolution No. 4569 approving the reapportionment along with a list of the described properties. .4044,14a Ba Benesch, Secretary Community Development RECOMMENDATION; RESOLUTION NO. 4569 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW HELD ON MAY 23 , 1994 Change In: Auditor's No. 0431 ,. Division No. : DL064747 Plat: GREENFIELD PLAT 2 (SANITARY SEWER) Motion by: - WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution of the City Council of Mounds View, adopted Resolution No. 4569 , the Special Assess- ments for the Construction of Auditor's No. 0431 , were levied against the attached list of described properties, said list made a part herein; and WHEREAS, the above mentioned properties have been conveyed or replatted and are described according to the attached list, and said list made a part herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View that the assessments for Auditor's No. _ 0431 against the heretofore mentioned properties be correctly certified to the Auditor of Ramsey County for further collection in the amount stated on the attached list, said list made a part herein. Seconded by 5 ayes COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of said City DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have carefully compared the attached foregoing extract of Minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held on May 23 , 1994 , at 7 : 00 p.m. with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to the changing of the assessment for Auditor's No. _ 0431 because of the conveyance of/or replatting of certain properties . WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 23rd day of May , 1994 . ATTEST: Clerk, City of Mounds View (SEAL) CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW REAPPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION NO. 4569 Division No. : DL064747 D/P No. 0047 NAME OF ASSESSMENT: SANITARY SEWER Auditor's No. : 0431 (Greenfield Plat 2) ORIGINAL TOTAL ASSESSMENT (From Division Form) LOT AREA (S. F. ) A. 08-30-23-21-0013-9 24 , 910 $ 0. 00 (OLD PIN NUMBER) B. 08-30-23-21-0041-4 14, 357 $ 1, 080 . 35 (OLD PIN NUMBER) Total Original Assessment $ 1, 080 . 35 REAPPORTIONMENT (From Division Form) LOT AREA (S. F. ) 1 . 08-30-23-21-0047-2 23 , 592 $ 0 . 00 (NEW PIN NUMBER) (Amount) 2 . 08-30-23-21-0048-5 13 , 038 $ 1, 080. 35 (NEW PIN NUMBER) (Amount) ... . wfir_ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL, CONSIDERATION Agenda.sec-mon: ,p 7.0� —"a .spot_Muer. I_ y ma , 91 1177c �.�� , � �� ,I, Reparc Date: 5-19-9/i ._ Coun i mon: C Specai Order of Busres CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE May 23, 1994 0 Public Eearings 0 Consent Agenda Council Business Item Description: Adopt Resolution No. 4572 Approving the Development Review of the est inster Corpoai.on for.an 83— it Senior Housing Project. Adopt Ordinance No. 538 ' �• •i• : • •- •• -. _r 'ti . - un ..ings". of the Monnds View Munici•al Code Administrator RaviewiRecommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. E.'cplanationiSummarj (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) • ,5.177YITVi ARY; Westminister Corporation, in a joint venture with MSP Real Estate, Inc., has made application for . a Rezoning, PUD and Development ,Review for a senior housing complex to be located within Mounds View. The specifics of the request are as follows: The complex would contain 83 units available for seniors 62 years of age and over. Located on a 2.7 acre parcel adjacent to County Road I (see attached map), the project would provide a complex with a community room - including kitchen, a crafts room and a library. The building will be three stories with parking facilities provided underground. The site is within walking distance , of parks, drug and retail stores, and public transportation. The applicant has provided Staff with a copy of a site plan concept which will be available for review at the meeting Monday evening. The request, as proposed would require the following City actions: • 1) Approval of a rezoning of the subject property from B-2, Limited Business, to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The rezoning is necessary to allow the applicant to "massage" the regulationsof the Municipal Code relating to area requirements, open space requirements, setbacks, etc. It is the intent of PUD zoning to provide a district which allows the City and developers some flexibility in locating structures on unique .or limited parcels. Paul Harrington, Com nity Development Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 4572 approving the Development Review of the Westminister Corporation for an 83-unit Senior Housing Project. Adopt Ordinance No. 538 amending Appendix A,"Specific Rezonings", of the Mounds View Municipal Code. STAFF REPORT PAGE TWO MAY 23, 1994 2) Development Review for the entire project. This review will ensure compliance with all applicable City codes. Staff has informed the applicant that additional plans showing landscaping and storm water control measures will need to be provided as part of any formal action being taken on the request. This item has been reviewed by the City Council at their May 2, 1994 Work Session. At that time, Staff was directed to draft the appropriate Resolution and Ordinance for consideration of the request. Those documents are attached for your review. The Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed this request and taken formal action at their may 4, 1994 meeting. Their recommendation of approval (with conditions) is attached for your review. MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 382-94 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST OF WESTMINSTER CORPORATION, PLANNING CASE NO. 375-94 WHEREAS, Westminster Corporation has requested City approval to construct an 83 unit Senior Housing Project at 2701 County Road I; and WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a development review be conducted for all residential developments other than single family detached dwelling units within the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this development proposal: 1. Planning Application dated January 20, 1994 2 . Letter of request dated February 2, 1994 3 . Site/Landscape Plan dated March 18, 1994 and revised April 28, 1994 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the proposal is in conformance with all applicable requirements of Chapter 1119, PUD Zoning, of the Mounds View Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the development review request contingent upon the following: 1) All fees and costs associated with the review of this request including, but not limited to, appropriate Planning fees, consulting engineer fees and legal costs, shall be paid in full prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 2) The proposed Storm Water Control plan shall be approved by both the City Consulting Engineer and the Rice Creek Watershed District. 3) Provision shall be made for the safe crossing of County Road I from the proposed project site to the South side of County Road I fronting Silver View Park. Resolution No. 382-94 Page two BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 4th day of May, 1994 . ATTEST: Chairman (SEAL) Community Development Coordinator RESOLUTION NO. 4572 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST OF WESTMINSTER CORPORATION WHEREAS, Westminster Corporation has requested City approval to construct an 83 unit Senior Housing Project at 2701 County Road I; and WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a development review be conducted for all residential developments other than single family detached dwelling units within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the following documents regarding this development proposal: 1. Planning Application dated January 20, 1994 2 . Letter of request dated February 2 , 1994 3 . Site/Landscape Plan dated March 18, 1994 and revised April 28, 1994 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposal is in conformance with all applicable requirements of Chapter 1119 , PUD Zoning, of the Mounds View Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the development review request contingent upon the following: 1) The applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the Mounds View Economic Development Authority to ensure that the project is completed according to City approved plans . 2) The proposed Storm Water Control plan shall be approved by both the City Consulting Engineer and the Rice Creek Watershed District. 3 ) Provision shall be made for the safe crossing of County Road I from the proposed project site to the South side of County Road I fronting Silver View Park. Adopted this 23rd day of May, 1994 . ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator Ic, • ., . _ n 31 :355 I 71_6i1 __ 1 79!.:4 74_9 ;{ •r -.•I :Sus I� J' lla.ar<-•4.. �+ _ ^I - 79313e196i !. I1' i�I_: - i9«n _ 79� 7943..••I -7944 7927 I: • Y• ': - R-� - ��i - 79:0 • 79:3• :1 _-73;A1 '77n ;17442i,HiL:s"." �• '- , 3 pg 1lag 0 _ I N N I n I-CC 7901 7900 a ( o 110 175_CA `I H f-' +'�.• i_ 1. ty • _ I 77.1,-• N I N N •• '40T O 01 7SCTT S.. - -t 1.♦ I _ r.ILL`�crr -r�t,•.1 ..- _.Pr, ..� ? •TI'., ;� - W I _ killN N 7�gcrL91I � 10 1 N .• _ O O -... -i I 1/31 1 NiN1i 78931oIo1 IoIn Io ►�7 c _ In 1 N 1 N 1 7890 1:: 1::! N. Y B-2 7270 I nI n�, f I i F30 ,`•+ 'v I ` - ' 7277 - I 7834]] 7th .- .E-..- -,.. I -.3 ,.. '870 N t i8:•1 7860 7865 :1-�yt�.:2 •�:�t• 1 7801 I In 7Ca3... •7� w N I N I N rte• • - =1 7 7841 +-'y::`.: lrrtt Ti�1I 7rzt '77-2CIE ''.:.:I: %8401;• 7825 1:.•,-,:754-0 7829 .k. 6 3 R-4 o, .. .. _ .:,^ 72^.7,,1'• .t- .7813 ::I,.1. y 7781 itm ,ZD13-, 7790 �� :i 'SEMi//691 672q I ^: ��•. •.71siocr1 ..z":4;:•••='-.1...'"7!.-':: c ew, 4::1:.: ,7-,80 •: 7809:. . " 1 , • r: 7801 -7r81u 77591T0 _ -7800+ 7804 r1.. ..• i. 7801 • I. - 'Ti 601 T,97°,e-` -74-! 774917,7" 7767 • 1,y .. �./ ' 7E07' 1 • 77'.'0 W 17.51 I ,�..Ti 501 .r 7787.:-.-,:.- , • 1 �3a 7^9f 7.... ^� ah ` 77i 67 . 1 :7760 ` 7741 f_ •::7740i 7 6 7 : - '< I67.3 .�g 1 ,. cizcT77x7 .. I - T,50 777 . :I r.Ti�o 533 6/`St , ct77 T �� ggigaitl 8- . - VSs I 77.a rzT -'..I n2n{-- _ , CY� Emma ti •• _A �� '1' •7710 7717 'L .. • " ! 6.091 7101 -! • _._ 7775-.41 o f m 542 1 0 ,r:7700 'r -'u' 1• :_ ti I 2,,i I ,- ' . ...i -1.41r4Ordit . . 11121111111 • a uc is.i,40.o ...3,71:;;:"?n ,a vo ^�_ nNNCVCV 669 I 76701 � � - 1 N a-3 v r N cn. ^' N N cv N N 2`.SJI C� • r�" 663 I N 7E6C1 , • ► Ls49 O '647 I 7644+ - 5iS _023 I 7E341 76Z5 I N `6049 . 525 I 762'0 7 27 519 I :6001 7601 • ?� 1 7594 R v►eN - • J _R 7575I m a . e I ' 75es n PARK n/ %:a C 7_65 7570 nsN ',^,.' N� • , B- ^�Y -.R_'-_ 55 1 75.7:1-: 75H0 r ^ 9 COs n C Eli.45 7553 > a/ , ,•1 Pt _ 1 N 7 ry 15 I !G f n oNl/ 1 0�/�a an _ ^' c:. IC. ^545 PF N N-N/N-,.In ,a 00G i !- - - . _, Iii aN b N m I m I n a y C ^ N N • .. _ N III N N I /c^1 G'�N-'•\•\Cl N(j /- ry - 111 \ 4lW�YY N Ota 701 CRI�F N Ob / o -2,-, o -. .. o -N N N ‘...- 71 7471 I74-r� 49.3 NI :V 1 7.777. I - N N/' w N N 1_ 74.6' m :, 7-4' - .. 111. 1111 ....... ....._1111. ........ _ 74E i I 1 a1 1 1 1 C j _ ,....:..7.......:::::: .::::•::.‘;f:-''' - - -_ - I a r�41 - _ _ - _ . 1111. 1111. . 1111... 11:1::•. 7 - .. ......_..... . .....:... ...... 1111. 1111 . 1 1 G - Cl _ - .n O n W 'a 4c - 21 N - N 1: I• - - N I 44 ^4^a 1-571. I I ^i_•7^�Z - -- 7+09 I I 74.,.:j °re` 1(EN -d F� - 7403 I I i 4 3 I.` ;_'Ci3 - I ..._, F..\ .9, j74C cwt _; .557411 I 7'255 f ;-----:L 73731 �'�;(`.i,F� !�j G ', • a n f '•� r _ 1 c a I0 • 73K-•� -I iJ��7weI , �j 1 �� �• - I N '_:I� ... - - 1 . -iY I 1 ut 17_6^T �1� � ''i3 _ /` 1 N • N i, .may.. .-n �I a 772.8 1 �- 2C^i • • tav J m9 NI CII 7_:(,•I •%• 7' `Er i 1 1 ' m 9 I R'-a t a r, 71 T - C I "1 e �' I N 1 N , ,,, n 71••29 IN 1 1 (1 N I N 4 7 1 I.... 5"7 i 527° caar c rtl n� ^ 1 c .+; NNNNNNI=1 I 41 _. - i .3 I I I I \ ;-1-1,,,...1 I t.2I .r2 I .7... _1 ^; ti `, N 2I= ; 1 c^��, l I I j I _.7 -:561-026 1 c,c�r =I a l -I d I a l a i I a I v l �� \- I 1 I { 1 I - 1_ _ .r N I N( N N C.I N I N N N 1 1 1 .^. I - \ ! •!•251- 1 S.- 1 1 1-__r C'�� _�62e1I - rLOUIS-1 _ _4'4 _ � �� I. 1 7�[l., �4•• C.1- _71 5Ip • L I •O •a 1 11 •r.l -.. N I N -. -.I ._1` C I_-_'•• ^I ( � _ I 1,,_. ---4' ---.8'--! N N1 N• NI N1 NI NI NI N (ay' a' g I ,1217. q 1 1 __21 I 9179517 ; 4aj c249�-� 1 I 1 1 .1 N 155_1 v - :�9 I a. l I i _ I .C, _"_1 N I N i N i N I , N I , Na N I N n i!._I" w c�.y'c.2+ i I �4 717-0Vi+Y►•i.:42;_-�4a I "' 1 NiVI NI NI r NI NI NI N N N i , ...7.-;,: _ 1 + 1 I .'.:1 C.-EAR'1C71 • AVE• ;- Iy R-4 ..'1 -6(- L....1,7'11 ` Ln I� :h_r -. - 11C1 1c`•`-.. 1- ...._��^� . •.r - , ��r•s. _�' `3-y-=_ 1�"��'7,7, .. ..,' _ ,.• �:..:r-� .. .+{•.c•:.awl -'_ }.- =�.,.t7• J.ir- .....-.ice • _ . Feh-rua-v 2 , 1 394 Ms . Samantha Crduno City Manager City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, ?moi 55112-1499 RE: SENTCR HOUSING MCUNDS V Ew, MN Dear Samantha: Enclosedtheinfo_ ti Youhave :ec'e d we _t is ��a cr. ste thatsu::.i with cur ap_ cac_c.^. for T2= fund_nc and cu= Planned Unit De:e;cp;::e^z. 1 . ) PL'D Application • 2 . ) Resume / Track Record of Deve' 3 . ) Site Plan cf Prcmcsed J Pr.,oject 4 . ) Project Description 5 . ) Prelimina v Financial al Prof ect_ons Cur re^ esz tc the City c_ Mounds View is .-_o__. 1 . ) We =eCuest that the cit:: at rove cur _V7 =la: to :=L'i d an 80-unit, 3-s z.,"', senior a_er amen.. , - • nc as outlined _n t__.=, e__c_osed an The _:77D would uton the oro] ec_ adec- to 717 credits is and debt financing. __ said financinz is ina�a— az :e ...^nine ould revert to =x4stin- -. we ec es :at the -4_v =ant ^_s J e^.. 7 '17 _V e3- C- �t�2 -'S-• L'-g .tt -=- .funding _n .'_ ^ : nn ay...... a.---•� ' to cryo C� the tai _ncre en cene=acec =r_.., the �csed =c- eco . The _5 yea s wcul d .n-. once assessed re.3_ estate taxes and p==-4 ==, a mcu'nz _ -- estate ta:ces have been eszao__sne_ 2 . ) We re-:uest that the city defer all fees assccjate -n building permits, _^ ing approvals, T__ apprcvals , etc. until construction lcan cicsinc. 4 . ) We request that the city enter into an exclusive ag-eemen+ with Westminster and MSP to build this project. Y The project will be an 80-unit apartment community available exclusively for seniors 62 years of age and over. We plan to locate this property on a 2 . 7-acre parcel on County Road I and Mounds View Drive, just scut'1, cf Highway 10 . The property will be an attractive 3-story elevatored building with underground parking. There will be ample common space including a large community r ccm with full kitchen, crafts room, and library. The building will be super energy efficient meeting cr exceeding State of Minnesota energy guidelines and will be constructed with a low maintenance exterior_ The project will be functionally efficient a.or semi ors' needs and 'aesthetically appealing. The croj ect also has an ideal location that is within walking distance cf parks, drug stores, cther convenience retail stores, and publi c t_ansp or`.:aticn_ D177''=e0?!R The developer will be a joint n` wart: :a between Westminster and MS? Real Estate, Inc. Westminster Corporation is a ncn--refit corporation whose mission is to provide affordable cusing for people with low inccmes. Westminster has a 20-year track .cf providing over 2500 units of affordable housing innesc to residents. y�estmins ._cLs_op r,, -_ . t w_�l act as co-leve' .,pert! lnanacer and _ - co-developer, 1 - ! CCC_... :•:a_..r _ / Real f �C_ic Estate, Inc. is a development.:. and C^.^.5t� firm 1_::. in affordabl-e _hcus_. ~_ • Mil - aoMf - _ cemrutlc-.:_-,-ft m ., has been invo_ ved in the devel Went and C^tst_ru-? C-'tarjQ Ceiinc t_e aC 22 , M s c fCec units Cf a=forda^le hcuSinc Since its inceotiin1^7a cmm _ mtv 170 units rCLStoiya. to senors- construction company is headed ; . an individual over 20 !ears c.ccnsictiy experience, including nc over 2=00 ien .Cwillbe co-developer andce'e-a, ccntr.ctor for this a., ar-men n S'z 4C_NG In coder to provide a high c-:alitv rental housing SincC^=mu: i =v that ==2ffCr:a^1e tc Mounds Jey's cc.h iand esti^-tea ,• sen__-_s we ,e.=- d to a-s_s n= ls alaver.-'=_ra:ci-c package that includes conventional m:=zczce loans , ecu_-_raised from tax credits, and pa -as- :cu-o" -" assistance f=o- ` a e_- The - ass' stance is critic.' t� enabling this _ actaccess adecuate ec - ca� tal -aka this c actfeasble • The ma j cr_t*. cf f•.:ndi. for " is pert; will comae in the foil c' conventional_ me o ace loan financing. anticipate beingt cam_ We a _ a .� able t- raise apprtximate; y $2 , 920 , 000 in long term acrtgage Ican financing ( 32% cf costs) . The remaining funding for this property will come from an ec itv investor who w.11 acc..-re hcusing tax credits and ::nd ecuity dc_l=rs . The federal tvernment provides these tax credits investors based cn project costs and the number of units that will be set aside for residents who earn at cr below 50% cf county median income ( $20, 300/yea: for 1-person households and $23 , 800/year for 2-person households) . In order to receive the tax credits, we must provide a deed restriction stating that these units will remain affordable for 15 years, which we will extend• _cr an additional 15 years. We anticipate being able ' to raise app cximately $7 , 750, 000 in ec±:- from the sale of tax credits to an investor. In the state of Minnesota, housing tax credits are allocated to projects based cn a competitive amyl i ca`i an process administered by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ( - A) . W{th u t the City' s • TIF assistance, we would be unable to access tax credit financing, thus making this project infeasible. In other words, the City' s :'I7 assistance allows us to leverage approximately $1 , 750 , 000 in equity financing that might otherwise not be available. �?? CX,CdC7 T:ON •Our :re1Iainar; disc.:ssicns with the Ramsey County Assessor indicate that the proper`y will generate the following real estate tax levels and thus the following tax increment: Value = 80 units X $43 , 000/unit = $2 , 440, 000 Title -- `.axes a $^ 2.'1 000 lana X 7 . 42: X ^— = $ 15 , 7E1 - $2 , 120 , 000 buildino X 2 . 2y X 1 . 44,F$7 .mac $ 102 . F.=7; T .t3_ Annual Tax = 5 SAY c -r0 . nnn 1st full Veal tax increment- crane..^.t _ c ?C nen Cu__en,. =end Tax (7 . 770 ncremen- = 112 , 272 .� Recue_s..ed 1st year assistance 910 y.. '8.7)4-2 ? SZ 1 westmiester and MSr intend to pursue the devel ccment cf a similar senior apartment community cn adjacent land cnce this first phase is unde-way. We would anticipate submitting a formal recuest to tae city for T_T funding and PUD aporcval at tte time tte phase 11 proposal is ready to proceed. 24 ?+TS TC CZTV The city of Mounds View will accrue a variety or benefits from its assistance to this property: -. ) The City wi11 convert a minimal-tax-generating vacant lot into a tax-generating asset. 2 . ) The City will help provide its lcng-time residents cn fixed-incomes an affordable rental alternative. . . ) Seniors moving into new rental housing will arae-uc existing housing stock for vcuncer residents to move-in. 4 . ) Additional residents will help support nearby businesses. 5 . ) Senior residents will receive an ideal l oca t i cn ad j actin t to majcr services. _ 6 . ) The City of rounds .view will receive an architecturally aesthetic structure which will communicate a ccality '_mace to the community. we hope the c_` Mounds ill lock f r t' a`crem • ' CityView � _avc a _.� cn the enticited recuests . We lock fc'-ra_.. to ircr cj c with towards a successful co"^1 a�i ,-.n cf this projet. Si ice=e2.v, Ni i c =ir,�certcr,. President cc: JcP r9.C,72C" T.v'3CMZ?'-':c The Mounds View Senior Apartment Hewes are being, prcpcsed on the vacant lard at tte Nor ttwesz corner of County Road and Mounds View Drive, just south of Highway 10 . The property is conveniently ly located close to shcooing canters, support services , the , a. city park, and public transportation. Westminster Corporation and Mme? Real Estate, Inc, are creating tris building exclusively for seniors 62 years and over who enjoy an active, independent life style. Cptional near, nursing, housekeeping, and cher support services are available on an -rdependant, individualized basis. This build{n w411 be comzrised cf 80 one-and-two-bedroom units in a three-story elevatorad building. The building will be constructed wit-*_ an attractive low maintenance brick and vine, _ exterior. The design also calls for gabled roofs . The building has a ";I-shaped" design which provides for a semi- pri vats entryway area. The entryway will contain ' attracti v e landscaping for residents' enjoyment. The project will also contain approximately 22 on-grade parking stalls and 54 weather- protected n + stalls.underground stalls. 1 The building will contain a spacious lobby and lounge a=ea with ample state for scciali;'_nc and cathe=_nc. T:e=e will be a 1 c2 . community room ecu±aped with a full kitchenandstorage caoac_ty - � to provide maximum flexibility. The building has also set aside space -7or a li_rarv, and a—s and crafts area. Each floor will also } contain a l aund-a root as well - rwell - y Las additional storage Lin;..s ..a_lwa:s will_ a :e l li_-t 1 enercv savino l ' .- xtur es and each unit will have its own ent may cf=se: to orovide residents an area to decorate to their perscna_ taste. The building is ccntetpla. dd to contain_ _-- one-_eCrCC� L^ _- o and two-beroct ”nitscmra.y accor-" no to feedback -- __ t e make' study focus cr. session-; . Rents w{1_ start at a tremendously affordable rata cf $430 for a cne-bedroom and 5530 . 00 for a two-bedroom unit. :Ill rentshea- ::nde_cround ca-ace stall_ are ^r Pte- to ` am ado - c- 7, 1 £ Cr.e-bedroom670 units :`_1 be over so -tet- whereas , -::c-ped_ocm units will be over 900 sc. ft. Aooroxinately 7.5-% cc the a-ar trent Homes will be = restricted. .. :.coma nants annual income for a cr.= ;arson household an_ exceed 520 X00 _ - c trot and $2 , 300 for a -::o person household. These - 5 amounts are �s ted annually. The rat l , • w rest` --ions and will t: = be rented mn k=t ra_s .� ,c ..� . -e • • =ach unit Will contain a large la~ e kitchen v i_h an a� . . ca package ce,. c- sa;. c d; s=csa , *rest .gree re:r_gera:cr, range, and double sink. Cabinet3 w411 . contain addi ticnal wall hlocki ng sc as to maks then Were easily conver?1-le for wheelchair access . 3at •—ccns w; 1 1 be extra large to allcw for wheelchair accessibility. Each unit W4will 1 contain arc lA closet stace and walso contain aysecara'e walk-in storage space. --- - Units Will he air-conditioned with individual sleeve' air conditioners . Heat will be supplied through a hct water, gas-fired central boiler system. Each resident will have a thermostat to control their own unit tam. ratsr e. Units will also be eLuirped with emergency call service and an intercom security system for additional resident sa,ety. Const Konen is anti_ rated to start by fall 1994 wit an ccour.ancvdate of early sunnier 1995 . This building c su - r_er desicn li-y { tic,oat cue s an ed y�o lill a strong need in Mcurds view �^ affordable Sen!cr cuing in an excellent location fcr Seniors . DAT: 24-Jan-54 P?G;EC^ NA20v ti!CL-NDSVIE /SZNICR NUMBER CF UNITS 80 TEAR 1 • 1995 CC UP?uNC-' 9 . 004 RENTAL INFLATION 3 . 00; EXPENSE. IN LAT'TCN 4 . 00; TAXES/UNIT $1, 500 OPERATING EXPE'.ISE/UNCT $1, 950 ANNUAL RESERVE/UNIT . $150 RESERVE INTEREST 3 .54 APPLICABLE ANNUAL RA= 8 .36; OF BL G QUALIFYING 72 . 00% 1. USES LAND EARL C=STS SOFT C�S'_^S -r� , GG � , v00 $1, 003 , 000 RESERVES $100 , 000 TOTAL USES $4 , 670 , 000 , 2 . SOURCES MC.R 'GAGE LOAN FINANCING $2 , 920, 000 TAX CRED7:' PRCC"'DS $1, 750 , 000 TO'_AL $ , 6-, -V„ 3 . TAX CREDITS =aria:»> Cr BU=ZZING COST �Z'`�---- N'J 72 . 00 A74PLICA377. ANNUAL L R, '" 3 . 3 ^:t rrsc7AL =r.io_BLECOSTS $4 _- 000 TO'T_'L xt:_ .==Y=NG COSTS 5.2 , 01E , 00041_:-i�'l, L C�:� :' 3}(: rNT $ ' , 1 00 GAG , v0 4 . INC:2Z/XP ANALYSIS �_ _Y5�. j _' TTS F--"NT/UN-"" AN-HUAAL RENT 1 BEDROOM 30 $480 $115 , 200 1 BEDROOM 24 $420 $138 , 240 2 BEDROOM 15 $580 $11�5 260 1 BEDROOM — MKT , 2 BEDROOM — Y77"" , 3 $700 80 $ 55 , baa $700 $100 , 0800 • GROSS RENTAL INC ?O $521, 230 f ..2 80 95. 00% • HET RENTAL INCOME PARKING @ $35 $495, 0 0 LAUNDRY @ $4 $ 21 , 0 840 @ (90%) $ 3 , 0 $101, 134 EFFECTIVE GRcss .17.5COME 5621, 190 REAL ESTATE T a'' OPERATING ++X EXPENSE $_, �oo ($120, 000) Z ($156, 000) REPLANNUAL RESERVE @ 130 ($12 , 000) $ NET OPERATING INCC'M $333 , 190 DEBT SE?V=C. ($298 , 000) CASH FLOW 235 . 190 • 'I71:*FC..w c:=. o; XCt yS Y rs r"._;CAN ' -'rRE S: 225 W. X1= Blvd. c` cam . ''"_`T YP I C`Z Street Address, C y, 512Cta, and p Ccde ;r ram-; In ?rc«.arty (c&ec}c apprcp:facta `.7:• . Cw;,ar ct Przpir:y. r i C.:.-::.-Ac: to Ca Cssfrer Q Lome. Cfrk-:..^.r, Mar.ac r src = rpurr^.ua �` , �: Avraam (C-:.._=cnt•?y :� a ,_= o C::ar (iia i' • . :-..=umarrtary amiteru at yppdaarrt'a 'czarist In tXP VCIpertY may be rocv incl D•+x.4-141i GZy 3C-32e1 a?us rsquast 7,c4,pEr.r JNyCL/ 7.+ • :�" a<:. r....—or r-.' (- ..i-7 ter-=r• 7/ ,*'.^- Vi - 1.----4-78. a.c�ra=-dGerersi �cc�.icn � • i._. . . ci.;;�_� 1cr a erty 1cer�fic cn Numberi-ct 1 , 31 r 9, Sile V 2 • L'^21 Gvir,& NarterAG.^.•ra.. ?.`& RE-Lal v ,, _y 2510 M1=1.. '.z Ave. •1--„^,Q- lis. ti.v4f 444 Pr=ant U34 (L',ac.."t !.p rj•• b: rel Ur avviap Nacirl • M Slbrfe Farrlty Cwm1ri cU IiY.r " n:* i"-.y . Q Mutt-farr3y (Nc. cf.Un ? Q 9 in r'C:,rr.rraar-..ar -z-.1-1..t.. ts::r;rarr. Q lrs_:.'zai I .r..srt Q C".."-Ar 0mq:sin) . • C .--.- i.-..�.t: C ;..,.... --2= J i c.;-Tr:a - - .7-..::,--,u=-.37-• cf. ^,.'' ^. 2C-1=4 '. . --.-._.._, C --- a.-....--,--,-.-- .3'7-41-'4-7.. a _ _ „. �-� •--- _. -":'4..,_ ..--- �- • 1r • .gent ar_ :i s_.ar7.-._ -L anzIr. .If G c.ie=17... -:r,. c ....- 1 l 10 7ar-_/ .:i 7-• . - L_ .-- --- – l G___ ay7---T ^ 73G . ,.�`,-,L – - . /, =:awe rc:G Ate.=2iC.1_ T.sy =a r==:-.=1.7.,i. C , Y"1G rzi /�;, �/ ;! /, /.y �1, a (�.V EK.E2i t rlr 1,^ . ?.,5.— -../ //----/1// '.-- / .f I f MT"'Z.=.�..wf 111/f V Tf TTVTy'...-•VI 7.Y y,•••••••*7 Tf T*TS 7-5-...TINTf.I t+a7.-..ITK/t IY7 rf*1Tf 7.2-7,,,-• ...:_3es . ^.._--r_ ► L-- ?.'r3 in 'Z P..-74- +i t. ail tr'.'?3 + F-ac-mTS s" ^err ..cpaa+i ••,..., ':" S:G -tel �r�s ?Vic. 2 x�G_ ?`� '+r :=Ja c"s.n+irxn'. n -.C.-Z..r.ss1-�a" Sl.'-"7t' e•c m :1= 7.41L---j=- 4LI:'iad 7 :4-.-.-"---":7=71 �._.� ........-4, !.'r'tl S.3• ^r'^r. _ tY•K'NYr .1.Sr�� .P`Tt^R rr-s ei•Q�: 744,--1•oa :-.7 .•••• r...'+ Ir<_ • s. !T -_,. :.rrrrt. art .; mac^✓_.. :ZV�� - ...-:. -. .-r..=.:.-rt 1,r= v _ ? n p H c? -( :7; 2 m -- z n c9 �� Q TJ �:, I v c > — C: -, C: v ^J II :./5y D m -iii 0 T :� 0 n = z in. 1 O > p 1iS ZO- Gi- ` I Dm C - yc.t v m n n . I'C pCY) 70 ) = + p p Ii CDO ^ ' C .4Lbd5Inm' .0 - ' - 4.0 � C) 11 m --I . II C, II O N (A — if II ~ N 11 0 I 0 T Z! <I Li ? 1 lc n .'a Ln II � 0 1 c-'‘$ z v eZ cr II ^' rnc� 5:, I -on ISD 1 --h -- c..., II !I n 8 a t cr, _ II > ' C 1 m C) L 11 r Z1 _ �I 2 a o .....1II 0 7 pm 0 Ii ca) II t1 w • a ; o Ii ci �N o ,LA O y ,gp t — r Dim Ir- Z: II c./57 m I . v O I+ - + + : - N L U 1 1 a o u o 1 !- n m m I - _ cn > m - - I 5 -� © o U (a on © C) ,I I - 1 _ _ N I Cr) L: r N _ j c. � ^i = c,� ' D� -1 I > > LA O v twit I Z O 1 - r n P I o 0 o n cr, .) I r, in y o 0 0 0 I1 N. D o c _Z -x„72 REQUEST FOB. COUNCIL CONSID ERATIONn�5e�du:l0, 7: 10 '�• y .epos Niir-� er.94-1178C "If_ C �; ORT Report Date: 5-19-94 Counci Ac::on: C Specai Order of Busiaes CITY CO UN. 31 TLNG DATE May 23, 1994 Nx pubiic Hearings C Consent Agenda Council Business Item DescIption: Adopt Resolution Nos. 4573 and 4574 Approving the Development Review and Final Plat for the C.G. Hill proposal. Adopt Ordinance No. 539 Amending Appendix A Sper-ifi_c Rezoning,!'._ of the MouRats View Municipal Code Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report , � %1 - Comments attached. ExplanationiSummar! (attach supplenten sheets as n cessary.) iTTN[VT a jtY; Everest Development has made application for the following within the Mounds View Business Park: , • 1) Development Plan Review - Review of a proposed 29, 568 square foot facility on the so-called Building M site of the Mounds View Business Park. The facility and associated parking and landscaping will front Quincy Drive with a West exposure. The proposal plans for an additional 18, 050 square feet of facility to be developed as needed. The site will be serviced by 80 parking stalls, three (3) of which are handicap accessible. The planned parking facilities are in excess of the amount required by Municipal Code and should more than adequately service the site. Please note that the parking stalls on the plan are not sized as required by Municipal Code (9'x 18'-plan vs. 9 'x 20'-Code) however, Staff has met with the applicant and the corrected stall sizes will be provided on an .updated site plan and, should be noted in any formal action taken by the City Council. Staff has reviewed the submitted application and narrative provided by the applicant and found the request meets the intent of the Municipal Code as it applies to this request including, land use, setbacks, zoning, etc. As with other sites developed in the Business Park, provision for storm water run-off will be provided via a ponding system located on an adjacent property. The nature of the development (PUD) allows for storm water storage off site but, within the boundary of the entire PUD. Staff has forwarded a copy of the storm water control plan to the City's consulting engineer for comment. 2) Major Subdivision - The applicant has also requested approval of a Major Subdivision to allow for the subdivision of a portion of Pinecrest Addition (please see attached map) . The subdivision would create a 2 . 64 acre lot fronting on Quincy Drive. Staff has ' checked with the City Attorney and, as proposed, the Subdivision request meets all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. te't / r C Paul Harrington, CommuniDevelopment Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution Nos. 4573 and 4574 approving the Development Review and Final Plat for the C.G. Hill proposal. Adopt Ordinance No. 539 amending Appendix A, "Specific Rezonings", of the Mounds View Municipal Code. r 4 STAFF REPORT PAGE TWO MAY 23, 1994 3) Rezoning - Currently, the project site is zoned I-1, Industrial. The applicant is proposing that the property be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development, to accommodate the use of the parcel as part of the overall Business Park complex. This request is consistent with the plan for development of the Park originally submitted back in the late 1980's. This item has been reviewed by the City Council at the May 2, 1994 Work Session. Based on the discussions of that meeting, Staff has prepared the attached Resolution's and Ordinance for consideration. Please note that there are three actions necessary for the approval of this request. For the Councils' information - the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed this request and recommended approval at their May 4, 1994 meeting. RESOLUTION NO. 4573 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUEST OF C.G. HILL, MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK EAST WHEREAS, C. G. Hill has requested City approval for a Development Review for their proposal on the Mounds View Business Park East site; and WHEREAS, the proposal is subject to the requirements contained in Titles 1000, 1100 and 1200 of the Mounds View Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the following documents regarding this development proposal: 1 . Planning Application dated April 14, 1994 2 . Site Plan dated April 1, 1994 3 . Landscape Plan dated April 1, 1994 4 . Building Elevations dated April 1, 1994 5 . Grading, Drainage, Utility and Erosion Control Plan dated March 23, 1994 6 . Preliminary Plat of Mounds View Business Park East Building M Addition, dated March 30, 1994 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposal is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Mounds View Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the Development Review for C.G. Hill contingent upon the following: 1) Parking stalls on the site shall be a minimum of 20 feet in depth per Municipal Code. 2) The applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the Mounds View Economic Development Authority to ensure the project is completed according to City approved plans . Resolution No. 4573 Page Two Adopted this 23rd day of May, 1994 . ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 4574 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK EAST BUILDING M ADDITION PLANNING CASE NO. 367-93 WHEREAS, C.G. Hill has requested approval of a major subdivision for the property legally known as: - - - THE SOUTH 5 ACRES OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, PINE CREST ADDITION, EXCEPT THAT PART OF SAID SOUTH 5 ACRES LYING EAST OF A LINE BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 5 ACRES, SAID POINT BEING 414 . 36 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH 5 ACRES; THENCE SOUTH AT AN ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS RIGHT TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, AND SAID LINE THERE TERMINATING. OUTLOT B AND OUTLOT A, MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK, EXCEPT THAT PART OF SAID OUTLOT A LYING EAST OF A LINE BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT A, SAID POINT BEING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST, ASSUMED BEARING, 409 . 00 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID OUTLOT A; THENCE NORTH 31 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST 19 .26 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT A AND SAID LINE THERE TERMINATING. RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the plat is shown as Mounds View Business Park East Building M Addition and dated March 30, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the applicant's request for a major subdivision including one ( 1) lot and an exception portion and found that it is in conformance with all applicable sections of the Mounds View Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the requested subdivision and recommended approval in Resolution No. 379-94 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the major subdivision request by C.G. Hill contingent upon the following: 1. Park Dedication Fees, as required by Title 1200 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, are paid in full prior to recording of the Plat. Resolution No. 4574 Page Two 2 . The Plat shall be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of City Council approval. Adopted this 23rd day of May, 1994 . ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator CIT: OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION APPLICANT,: C. G. Hill & Sons, Inc. Phone 781-9541 ADDRESS: 2917 Anthony Lane North, St. Anthony, MN 5.7,418 Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code Interest in Property (check appropriate box): o Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee. Operator. Manager J Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other (explain) Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before find Gly action of his request PROPERTY INVOLVED: Address/Genera] Location 51XX Quincy Street in Mounds View Business Park; just north of Taco Bell and KFC restaurants and the Mounds View Inn moto1 _ Legal Description or Property Identification Number see attached Exhibit A Micnaei investments, a Minnesota general partnership Legal Owner: Name/Address (Everest affiliate) , 2685 Long Lake Road, Roseville, MN 55113 Present Use (check appropriate box): . in UndevelopedNacant ❑ Single Family Dwelling ❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling ❑ Multi-Family (No. of Units ) O Business/Commercial Establishment ❑- Industrial Establishment ❑ Other (explain) Property Classification: it Abstract 0 Torrens REQUEST: Rezoning from I-1 to P.U.D. , major subdivision, and Development/ Site Plan Review for proposed 29 ,563 square foot owner-occupied light industrial building for C.G. Hill & Sons , Inc. , in 'founds View Business Park (East) . 'Please note: Applicant may be responsible for additional lees associated width the review of this request I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUE. (%C�- k.e-6( Signature * �-- . isoZor,i„q 5200/acre.minimum 5200.maximum 51.000 Park Fund Dedication Fee A ` Variance R-1 to R-2-575, all others 5200 Date Paid Conditional Use Permit R-1 to R-2-575. all others S2C0 Receipt Number Code Appeal 575 id�• - °C)"I DeveloPJSite Plan Review SI QQ/acre. minimum 100. maximum S.500Total Fee3 Paid 1� _�� ' minor Sun 5150 Dare Paid Ma1or Subdivision 5250 plur 5250 deposit Receipt Number ,11---i- 17 //-- ° /t comp. Plan Amendment S203 AdditlonaJ Fee Paid Wetlau:t Alteration Permit S50 plus deposit determined by Statl - ;. . ; -" Wetland Butler Permit S10 Date Paid _- " Planning Sign 550 Receipt Numoer I -' PUO $350 PUD Amendment 5150 Data of final action APPROVED C DENIED ❑ TABLED C � - (_- 9� -6? ?,-:._. �`/2 PlinCase Admin. Account No. Date anng No. i _ 1 5387 53861 5387 O N NI NN N N NINI N N I N I'4'4' IN N5• �•p 5395;5335 5386 5385 w 536a�O .\ 5380 15381 I 53801 53791E 53801 5379¢ 5358 W \ ^ 5373 , I 5373 5372 l ( � I 5372i 5371 53721 5371 5354 -J 5352 on. z4 Egol 5366 5367 5366 1 536415363 536415363 5346 0 G 5357 5358 5359 I I I 5657 535815357 5358 5357 5344 2 & 5351 5352 5353 2n M 1,n rn -V^ rn _I M i 5 5340 \ 5354 u ,c,':- M N N o o rn _m 5 521 351 53521 5351 5438 Z J NIN N N N N N 5344 5345" 1‘.11`;••1 NjN jN NIN NI NIN N . 534415343 C 5332 1 LAMBERT AVE ,3aa15343 53301 5`�3S= 5336 / 5337 I i I r n i N o l e '° o N } 53381 5337 53381 5337 5326 5330 / 5331 LAMBERT NIN N I N N N c91,91-, Z 533 53 5324 S NIN N N N N N I N I C",/ iv 01 5329 301 5329 5318 Zi Q 326 5323 5324 PARK I O OZ 5324153232 3 a �� I 532415323 5324.5323 5376 , 530 • 5317 1 I 53161 531511 53161 5315 0 530& 5 x S3 \ 5309 = I 530 (/) 7. O��, I 1 530_8;_-__t 5308.5307 m 530 0 a "'yj S®� 0 52981 5301 53j2 I G'_-� x_„3;5299 5300I5299 529 = s 6;1:9 -6 p 5295 ,n c. rn _ M In rn M m I— M In'rn!— ul 52941 5293 5294 529 5294 0 J I•-529((y N m N N.N N N N ,r M N N N •ml m. 5290 T Y `( N N I N N N N N N N N N I N N -1- L M U ,5287 N N 1 N I N N 1 N 1 N( N I N(N I N I N Iola,N N I N N 52881 5287 52881528,. 52881 E CO RD H2 1 'L I N N 5275 5267 a ' 'Ile Ve ry'7 5263 • 5284 ry5a� 5251 C ..I m 'o ti �1 52q N 'C 5230 —; N1h ^ N 527.• 4h. i 5 5269 1�� l / 2B. , :• X260 ; �ODALE DR JJ �� 52501525 N7�1:r R N 5200 w (./ /1 5240 5249 5240 524001PR,Ct) N N 52(1 • V J523d5239• 5230 523• 523. ryZ 522d 522• 522.522• 5220, t 411r, J ti� a• 521521. 5210521• 521 ' �• ���/)/11// i52001520• 52005209 52001 �� tt 00`- OO 'L• • 1D n t0 10 '1,NNNNN NNNNN 1CryrtiM1_ ry JD ,1ti" I : ppM • lir -3 r Z O ,notoc, 2 I ti• �\GRE W • III RICE CREEK D 'TOW . at on 01 N N N NJN N N N CL/ RD II 1411111# . n int • • • . 1_ 2 • . . . . . . . Li./ i---• ii.• z y..• 1•t a r TOWNS EDGE TERRACE `� n o • MOBILE HOME PARK c' is t. I AI1- -..-y7--:::::.1 - 5 ,4,...-__ 1 1 i I • 1 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The south 5 acres of Lot 2 , Block 2 , PINE CREST ADDITION, except that part of said south 5 acres lying east of a line beginning at a point on the north line of said south 5 acres, said point being 414 . 36 feet east of the northwest corner of said south 5 acres; thence south at an angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds right to the south line of said Lot 2 , and said line there terminating. Outlot B and Outlot A, MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK, except that part of said Outlot A lying east of a line beginning at a point on the south line of said Outlot A, said point being South 89 degrees 19 minutes 21 seconds East, assumed bearing, 409 . 00 feet from the southwest corner of said Outlot A; thence North 31 degrees 43 minutes 48 seconds East 19 . 26 feet to the north line of said Outlot A and said line there terminating. Ramsey County, Minnesota P. I . D. No. 08-30-23-41-0009 (Part of) P. I. D. No. 08-30-23-41-0007 P. I . D. No. 08-30-23-44-0014 • PLANNING APPLICATION C. G. HILL & SONS, INC. • OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL FACILITY SUBMITTED APRIL 4, 1994 INTRODUCTION The following narrative materials and information are submitted to supplement the plans and Planning Application submitted April 4 , 1994 , concerning the proposed office/industrial facility for C. G. Hill & Sons, Inc. , in Mounds View Business Park. In connection with the proposed facility, applicant C. G. Hill & Sons, Inc. , is requesting Development/Site Plan approval for the project, rezoning of the site from I-i to Planned Unit Development (P.U. D. ) , and major subdivision approval to create one platted lot from three existing legal parcels. PROJECT SUMMARY The proposed Hill project includes a 29 , 568 square foot single- story office/manufacturing building to be constructed on the so- called Building M site in the undeveloped southeast portion of Mounds View Business Park. The architectural style, building materials, landscape treatment and intended use of the proposed facility are consistent with and are designed to compliment the existing buildings in the business park. C. G. Hill and Sons , Inc.., is a second generation family-owned company engaged in the design, building and repairing of precision machinery and equipment. The proposed new facility will accommodate C. G. Hill & Sons expansion and relocation from its current company-owned facility in St. Anthony. The new facility will be built by Everest Construction Co. , for ownership by C. G. Hill & Sons , Inc. , or its principals . • DEVELOPMENT TEAM APPLICANT: C. G. Hill & Sons, Inc. PROPERTY OWNER/SELLER: Michael Investments, a Minnesota general partnership (Everest affiliate) SITE PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE: Dovolis Johnson & Ruggieri, Inc. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Dovolis, Johnson & Ruggieri, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEER: Putnam Consultants, P.A. SURVEYOR: All-Metro Development Consultants, P .A. GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Everest Construction Company TAX INCREMENT CONSULTANT: Casserly Molzahn & Associates, Inc. LEGAL COUNSEL: John Parsinen, Parsinen, Bowman & Levy (Applicant's Attorney) Bruce - Malkerson, Popham, Haik, Schnobriach & Kaufman, Ltd. (Everest attorney) DEVELOPMENT TEAM CONTACT INFORMATION: APPLICANT: C. G. Hill & Sons, Inc. 2917 Anthony Lane North St. Anthony, MN 55418 781-9541, Fax 781-2706 Contact: Dick Hill, President PROPERTY OWNER/ SELLER: Michael Investments, c/o The Everest Group, 2685 Long Lake Road, Roseville, MN 55113 636-5500, Fax No. 636-0183 Contact: Tim Nelson SITE PLANNING & ARCHITECTURE: Dovolis, Johnson and Ruggieri, Inc. 1121 East Franklin Ave. , Minneapolis, MN 55404 871-6009 , Fax No. 871-1746 Contact: Scott Nelson or Brian Johnson CIVIL ENGINEER: Putnam Consultants, P.A. 7441 Jolly Lane • Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 425-1233 , Fax No. 425-2033 Contact: Dave Putnam SURVEYOR: All-Metro Development Consultants, P.A. 7111 West Broadway, Suite 201 Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 566-8487 , Fax No. 566-8517 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Everest Construction Company 2685 Long Lake Road, Roseville, MN 55113 636-5500 , Fax No. 636-0183 Contact: Rick Baker TAX INCREMENT CONSULTANT: Casserly, Molzahn and Associates, Inc. 215 South 11th Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, Mn 55403 342-2279 , Fax No. 334-3382 Contact: James R. Casserly and Mary Molzahn LEGAL COUNSEL: John Parsinen Parsinen, Bowman and Levy 100 South Fifth Street, Suite 1100 Minneapolis, MN 55402 342-0313 , Fax No. 333-6798 (Applicant C. G. Hill & Sons, Inc. , Attorney) Bruce Malkerson • Popham, Haik, Schnobriach & Kaufman, Ltd. Suite 3300 222 South Ninth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402 . 333-4800, Fax No. 334-8888 (Everest Attorney) • LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The south 5 acres of Lot 2 , Block 2 , PINE CREST ADDITION, except that part of said south 5 acres lying east of a line beginning at a point on the north line of said south 5 acres, said point being 414 . 36 feet east of the northwest corner ofsaid south 5 acres; thence south at an angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds right to the south line of said Lot 2 , and said line there terminating. • Outlot B and Outlot A, MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK, except that part of said Outlot A lying east of a line beginning at a point on the south line of said Outlot A, said point being South 89 degrees 19 minutes 21 seconds East, assumed bearing, 409 . 00 feet from the southwest corner of said Outlot A; thence North 31 degrees 43 minutes 48 seconds East 19 . 26 feet to the north line of said Outlot A and said line there terminating. Ramsey County, Minnesota • P. I. D. No. 08-30-23-41-0009 (Part of) P. I . D. No. 08-30-23-41--0007 P. I . D. No. 08-30-23-44-0014 • EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS The proposed Hill project site consists of approximately 2 . 64 . acres (114 , 955 square feet) of land, with approximately 230 feet of frontage on the east side of Quincy Street. The site is bordered by the Clinch-On Products building to the north, undeveloped land to the east, the Mounds View Inn motel , Taco Bell and KFC restaurants to the south, and Quincy Street and the Liberty Check building to the west. Current zoning of the site is I-1, Light Industrial . • SITE ACCESS Access to the site will be via two new driveways from Quincy Street at the western edge of the property. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN The proposed 29 , 568 square foot building is situated facing west, fronting on Quincy Street, with associated parking and vehicle circulation areas between Quincy Street and the building. The site is served by 80 parking spaces , including 3 handicap stalls . An area of 11 future parking spaces is also designated in the southern portion of the site. The site provides room for future building expansion of up to 18 , 050 square feet, for a total building size of almost 48 , 000 square feet. Site landscaping is to be provided consistent with the remainder of Mounds View Business Park. The landscaping includes a variety of Evergreen and ornamental species to provide year round color . Landscaping selections include Colorado Blue Spruce, American Linden, River Birch, Marshall Ash, Red Splendor Crab Apple, Anthony Waterer Spirea and Pfitzer Junipers. Site drainage will be directed to catch basins and conveyed via • piping system to the southeast corner of the site. The system will outlet to a sedimentation area. constructed on the adjacent site owned by Everest. The runoff will flow through: the sedimentation basin, flow overland and into the existing detention basin along Program Avenue. The outlet, sedimentation basin, overland flow, and existing ponding area will be modified upon the development. of the Building N site at which time the storm sewer from the Building M site will be extended to a proposed expanded ponding area along Program Avenue. • Delivery service to the building will be provided via one truck dock and two overhead drive-in doors located in a recessed service area in the northwest corner of the building. Trash dumpsters will be maintained inside the building with pickup via an overhead drive-in door. The building will include approximately 4 , 000 square feet ( 14%) of finished office area with the balance of the building devoted to production, shop, storage and distribution space. The building exterior will be constructed of concrete masonry block, with painted surface, with decorative "rock face" block and an accent band of single scored block on the building front, with smooth-faced block on the remainder of the building. The front of the building will include a glazed store-front type entry with anodized aluminum framing, and matching windows in the southwestern portion of the building where the offices will be located. The building height will be approximately 20 feet. LAND ALLOCATION AND COVERAGE CALCULATION SITE AREA: 2 . 64 acres (114 , 955 square feet) BUILDING AREA: 29 , 568 square feet BUILDING TO LAND COVERAGE: 25 . 7% PARKING AND DRIVE AREAS (35%) : 40, 247 square feet TOTAL HARD SURFACED AREA OF SITE (61%) : 69 , 815 square feet OPEN SPACE AND GREEN AREA (39%) : 45 , 129 square feet CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE The Hill project is proposed for construction commencing on or about June 1, 1994 , as soon as necessary project approvals can be obtained, with completion by December 31 , 1994 . \ ` 00m, C y I 7- `c. 7 4.1 t,i :, i 1 1 I I I l I IN I I S 1 I8 :�I \•, lye .s {'�' 1 - Is la E° 111 N I. �.I IIII I11 181 r-- ! I 'tel 1- 1 I VIII 1 I r_} ,ate, I I a _ _ I " I,a e c 5 m r I 2 I a�^ i I I I I m ; > I f �+� I 11 I I I I I I• I • I- r, '‘,2 1 F I I I \\ is N 1 . I I 1s a 0 gg gg I a I I r r r r r is 8 L— ` f ? I I I I 1 I l i a.4 1 I I 1 r4 • � '�1 I la i U i... a,. : ''.13 I 1 I e •¢I ;'''4 -a • c ra I.: 8 S CIE 1r» 1 I . 1 O IS 8 I I I I c : ° II , 1 II I i ..>„ + — — — — — — — 1 • :O&M r e•..a♦f• ''I1,AI?Iyl4 A P•akrr - ff---- Cn 111"moi? '� C.G. HILL & SONS MANUFACTURING BLDG. 11 _._ s ' i �\ AZO QUINCY ST.—YOUNDS v1EW BLDG. .M. III '�":._ C�O II j 1-,:rI. t SITE PLAN '!i — ___ ;I 1 "c 4.31:,.1: , ! 7'Z a Cy •V......._pi fSi. ,_, Ilitld Ili ti 7 2,113F -,, , 411..i I ili . 211 ili , i - '!lipI .1 1ri--._.4.,.._ li 1 I I IrTT I 1 iro � I'0� A'3� = I , . ' '� I � IIIII li . ; • ,1. .. -- II " , \ �� 4 - - " I 1 1 i I „,-Th —it—. i I iaao d 1 VI I IC1 . r :—..—.— \—! ,N� = — —1 ( I ai n –1 y, :` i t%. I i 1 ! (. m =' • ' � • 1 �' IIII { I ILII :, \ _ ,ice Ilil G� \ 11 a 1 1 := i 5 , . ag G 1 1 1 1 1 1 i �� �I 3 i qo 7,'- '7p,..-2oAaow -o.w-. ,;,�;J,y 1p. ± IIIill i i iR i i ,l j1 111g;ii il UI t a 1 O O �, i ; r�a ;ter: - J 1 .4.5— aD A0 ;N I 11 iii.''��:":.l .... yMr� .Nr1iiMRB1 <mt < O - • O Q ,wiz '#a -O ,1111, --O 1 • ...:: .. • I, i. UI : I-1. 1,..-...iris:::.! _ I' u _ 1 T1T1 l _ _ : • ii 1 a:' I Iy i E _ _ i7 I; • !nil :..: rrii«r irrrt�rrrci� - _ l _ �} f•II. III .I • 111r 1 .. I ! Z:': I i „1 I . I 1 - T • > 1111 _. 1 I 1 Ilf ill ;fill lj J; 1 ;& .i 1 s I?h i C.C. HILL AND SONS MANUFACTURING BLDG. 7,7"."-"'"--.""*.--'''''— 2 ° 1 > 1 QUINCY ST.-MOUNDS VIEW BLDG. 'M' ISI ''.••—;.•:."':--•'••1.-•"....-.:-...."-...". 07 i`�. / � ASO is1 r.wm . 3 h BUILDINGIELEVATIONS JAI _ �T } �\ "cH _z 1 — — — — _---- 1,I'• \ r 0/,y �ril./ 'f t . I • ., . . 4 , ; �s,� t,1 r t ` • r• :Ii'...\f ss. ' I4 t: `_ i I I I I Ir I �f\ ‘ I _ .1 C / s 8LLLLjJ1 I I •. .\.‘ I Ii . — —..—r — �_ , I 1 1 I I� I I II I I I I , Y I ,Ly7 'q' 1 ' I I , ,I I T -' �jC �} I' I 11�� I / ' I 1 i\ VI ). r M L. •1' ' 1 \ 'i I —'--1 1 1 I i ± I' ! 1 \I I: ' ' tr .Y r.» i s P , I' !, i .r G / ��. 1 1 I Of 1 \ I r I ,.' r Ii i� D 1 °o. , r' 1 • • I • g, I a r Y • ' I �' • SilI I I I m y •I I I •� _ 1II I I J, , • O , .1 i I I I , I I ISI a 'A x . wt • . • I I ' I l l I I I • j •C I • I 1 I I•_ 1 it ' ' I i �.. 1" — — .n. I G I 1 I / o I I s i .` II Y 111 • li 1 g . !PI xl t I'L,l�� I C.C. HILL k SONS MANUFACTURING BLOC. 11 ______ : I I 2. • • QUINCY ST.—MOUNDS VIEW DIJJU. 'V' ,1 `.. ��( �� t (. 1 UNA DING DRAINAGE.UTILITIES 'II �"' I �t �Z� r% AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN ---�-- t :i,•,,'!'s • 'E," -----__ • E ,ac,'.77 ...--'7"--...,..... If i : 7.40 ,. .....,, ........____........__.__.__._.___ .. • .rN 1'--. '`• , .-_____ - z ...A...7,...... .z.z.... :--1 ... ,. `,..i. , I el \ 1 `'7•4,:-`-...... 1'7- . .:Z.. •vt :, \ 1 • - •• ••••- •z!le 8,1 I y --..—.1..I. - --,•v ...........„;„, ,: t I ........,.r..'.7.• ( I I ' 1 ' il (1 . p 1 —-—E---f . 1 -- . -•,I r4 1 i i i,,. _ _ i 1 ( 1 • 1 , , 1 r :,, I \\to.) 1 4 - • 1 I .- ; . .. ., ..: . trig \ ,.... \\ I.. • I i ize.. I ..:-I 1 1 11( `,..„..:\•-_:::-..s :, ) h I gi ! I + . " I 1\.. \ ', ..• —= )‘.,/ '/,' (/ I 4144z -1. • I ,.co '.- r• " i I i Ci/vo ..; 4-- , ,....rvi\ii, 0 ,::,/ . II•i- ",-.. • • .1 I i Of..fi,, I, Y il •.1'1 a(b,-. !a oln• /y 1 — 0' \\ I ) 1' ••) . ,'7.s.; . '1\TI -..7. 0 ' -'•••-, -ir ,... .../ •,•'‘;'''-z.. '4el"1 t \e, \e l Ilt • C C —. r- , 4 /,' \ • 4 l!i : 5 E -- ' .• \ e, ---, _,. • ' , •v , ----,___ .,h / \ / 1• \ (:),:•,, ,' 1 0 CI ..- \ .3). I I' CI) i \ -' " ' . ‘ A, • 1, I I \ I'''' \ \ 7r 1 F; ;,1 '1 k,_,..- \ .•• .., < !/ \\ , !,,,t,. ,,..././0 4 • i 1 . 1 \ •'".. ...-'''... •••".,IS r , m \ '• ' -_.... • .... , ...... --...... -, ...,._ c " .. -- . • 11. ... ON ,I, .I.1 . -........... ---.4, ...::. .e.; .1r '.. , 'e, .''. --. .. .:-,. ` . 1 cr) --; = * . ,. , /t. ., ,..., 1 rri 3 03 \ • .... ", • • • , .., ----- .. 3 • . (..-) x c x \ .1 ''\''L-• Mr . - ---- \ ; -P. • Cn r.". • 12 .HL",.....2.0=1.5 .-itiltlir",17S1:2,:.fa:I '1. s`-:.t '"'/,1, ', \ 1 ; :C• 7 > - — _ • • -- \-i'' 8 '5. -'-.. $s • \ '' r = 3: , N . I .• ' . „Cq \ Z s I :.! s's'6*..1/45, \ I I •If- M Z r,, 6140, i \ '`.. i' I I HI . ,':. ., `-'•Q I I . • '. cC\ 1 i (r),.. \ ' 444 . -- <0.. I \ 4- \\ \\ '5 4..fQ,, / i. • ! I • -----'-‘,\)•,- ---,:-.......-....,.\-3•.,,,-•-4,.1-:.N./•.........0......--.._--,.-4.,-. —4'.•A y,'"-'p-h--..,.s-c•,1-\\.„..,'.. 'C•AI/i I/!j.l!i..:,', • I 1 I.. 0 c‘•j •. :: • l.i I1 /, . 1i, \ . 00/ri , . .„/ / eI, / i - J- i 4 00 / V M;=>"•.0•-. _ I ,•1 / •-•••• / ; 1 : -1 > -7-----... ' :1:, 4..'....„ ;75 i , 4 ‘ ,• i 0 _ - f '''%•`..- rli .., .. .. ".,:- // / / , • ' '•• "...., A.17,,,..'"i....."`":7"7`,..•7';> /, ( N., i ! ! 1, t•4, --'''••-/N .i ' / N-.•-, ‘•`...''' i;;L' 1 ! Z '6" .9.-. •-.. .„, \ 1 '` 0 -:- i ; ; ; 1 i ill 1 it W i ! I i '1 • .9°1' N,'?"'.1:-N\ .•- •. ' 1 : ! s • I I • 1 • : i - li. 1 I ! i • .: :' . , 1 f ,. . , :•1 L 'i ' • • '' f • - • ' 1 -r• ' ,.• li , • I !,-g . , - .'-- . ' 4.7Q1..r 1.4,..,..,,t_ '...").,,....7:'.' ''' ', • > • Os .. .. .- . I : - • . 11, '•-•, 4-q,-. , Cl "----=- '' .-----z ',.•;,• 6 —4 ,.-174..N.,. 1 ...... e_—_,. _........ .... , i _ ..., — 0.1/4..2.. .. ..• , ' ,-•• Z •,.., • , i i i i iF171? :volt i ..-•.-::, - - i • ' .1 "ii.....t ••.T.i ' ;•-•,,,,. -----...... : 2 A 2 : ::•'"?. 7;- -. 2 • A.,, a ; i ::4:::. c.'I:. • Lt . . i . . .:::-L :, • .274, 7 : : F:::::- •:-P4i i i 7 : ---- ---- - I !..1'11- 11!••• -.1 : FiEF FIE 17 • -- ••---7 :-.: :. ::.i :: : ! ••liti7C, 1:::'ir 1 rti-Fli -tt 1-7.. i :_:•:i :::- - . r.i •: fr:f.ii ::'! iiii:.---1 : r.1. ":1.11 .. .2 , ' ..2!,i'1 :_z : : A . . ...[:"E 1•1'i i rt.”' :1'..'•1 . ; t.I•1 _.-1 ;Pt' iqii _ li -•.s. • •:., ..-.... , ___ 11, ALL-METRO - - - _ -_ _-- a —...r.;-- M.O.M.•0..J.Mom••en NM. - --7.-1. —. .i;•L:••••.7.7.. 7.::::.7.r • P 77:7 ,.M.. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL COiV�ERATION Report Nusber.9/—1 1 79r ..6;.--__ STAFFArmada sec:oat l(), 7! 15 REPORT T neparrDate: 5_1A_94 fli :�:; Counci:mon: • C Special Order of Busines CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE May 23, 1994 Pioiic Hearings C Consent Agenda C Council Business Item Description: Adopt Resolution Nos. 4575 and 4576 Approving the Development Review and Final Plat for the Multi-Tech Expansion Project. Adopt Ordinance No. 537 Amending Appendix A, "Specific Rea.e 4 s," of tke - _ •- V�p� M,mi 'ipal rada Administrator's Ravi ew/Recommendacon: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. ExpianationiSummarj (attach supplemea sheets as ,ecessar/.) ,alimy/ RYz verest Development, representing Multi-Tech, has made application for the allowing within the Mounds View Business Park: • 1 ) Development Plan Review - Review of a 59, 970 total square foot two- -tory building/facility addition at Multi-Tech Systems to be constructed .n the West end of the existing Multi-Tech building. The addition will onsist of a 28 , 299 square foot building footprint, a 28, 171 square foot -econd floor and a 3 , 500 square foot addition on the East end of the suilding in the loading dock area. Staff has reviewed the submitted application and narrative provided by the applicant and found the request eets the intent of the Municipal Code as it applies to this request , including land use, setbacks, zoning(if approved) , parking, etc. A review .f the provisions for storm water control on the site is currently nderway. Staff anticipates no problems with storm water control on the -ite as the ponding area constructed as part of the existing Business Park as sized to handle the further development of this property as well as the .roperty to the immediate West. JP ) Rezoning - Currently, the property located immediately West of the ounds View Business Park is zoned B-3 , Highway Commercial (please see attached map) . The applicant is proposing that the aforementioned property i.e rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development, to accommodate the proposed se of that parcel by Multi-Tech for required parking area. Also, the rezoning would provide consistent zoning for the entire Business Park omplex. Plat Approval - A Major Subdivision of the property immediately to the est of the e Mu �//lti-Tech site is also being proposed. The property Paul Harrington,/Community Development Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: dopt Resolution Nos. 4575 and 4576 approving the Development Review and Final Plat for the Multi-Tech expansion •roject. Adopt Ordinance No. 537 amending Appendix A, "Specific Rezonings", of the Mounds View Municipal Code. STAFF REPORT PAGE TWO MAY 23, 1994 contains approximately 11.55 acres and, as proposed, would be divided into two (2) lots. The Easternmost of these two lots would be incorporated into the current proposal as parking area and the remaining parcel developed at a later date. This item has been reviewed by the Council at their May 2, 1994 Work Session. At that time, Staff was directed to draft appropriate Resolution's and an Ordinance which would allow for the approval of the project. Please find the requested documents attached for consideration. The Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed this request and has recommended approval. RESOLUTION NO. 4575 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST OF MULTI-TECH, 2205 WOODALE DRIVE WHEREAS, Multi-Tech has requested City approval to construct a 59,970 square foot addition to their existing facility at 2205 Woodale Drive; and WHEREAS, the proposal is subject to the requirements contained in- Titles 1000, 1100 and 1200 of the Mounds View Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the following documents regarding this development proposal: 1. Planning Application dated October 29, 1993 2 . Site/Landscape Plan dated October 4, 1993 3 . Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan dated October 14, 1993 4 . Exterior Elevation Plan dated October 8, 1993 5 . Floor Plan dated October 27 , 1993 6 . Electrical Site Plan dated October 27 , 1993 7 . Illumination Distribution Plan dated October 27, 1993; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposal is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Mounds View Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the development review request of Multi- Tech contingent upon the following: 1) The applicant enter into a Development Agreement with the Mounds View Economic Development Authority to ensure development of the project proceeds according to City approved plans . Adopted this 23rd day of May, 1994 . ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 4576 CITY OF. MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK WEST ADDITION PLANNING CASE NO. 367-93 WHEREAS, Everest Development has requested approval of a major subdivision for the property legally known as: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 10, AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, ALL IN SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 30, RANGE 23, ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF. WHEREAS, the plat is shown as Mounds View Business Park West Addition and dated April 19, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the applicant's request for a major subdivision including two (2) lots and found that it is in conformance with all applicable sections of the Mounds View Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the requested subdivision and recommended approval in Resolution No. 380-94 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the major subdivision request by Everest Development contingent upon the following: 1 . Park Dedication Fees, as required by Title 1200 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, are paid in full prior to recording of the Plat. 2 . The Plat shall be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of City Council approval . Adopted this 23rd day of May, 1994 . ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator April 25 , 1994 Paul Harrington Planning Technician City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Re : Planning Application (originally submitted 10-29-93 ) Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. Dear Paul: Enclosed and submitted to you are fifteen (15) full-sized copies and two (2) 8 1/2" by 11" reduced copies of the following plans which we are resubmitting in 'connection with the Planning Application originally submitted for the noted project on October 29 , 1993 : 1. Site/Landscape Plan; 2 . Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control Plan; 3 . Building Floor Plans; 4 . Exterior Building Elevations; 5 . Site Lighting Plan; 6 . Preliminary and Final Plats for Mounds View Business Park West Addition (the plat drawings are a new submission) . Also enclosed is an Abstractor' s Certificate listing the names of all property owners within 350 feet of the subject project. We, and Multi-Tech Systems, request that you reinstate this Planning Application on the earliest possible meeting schedule with the Planning Commission and City Council. Our goal is 'to obtain all required approvals to permit a construction start on or about June 1, 1994 . Except for the Page Two • April 25 , 1994 Paul Harrington City of Mounds View plat, the Planning Commission acted to recommend approval of this Planning Application on December i, 1993 . As you recall, the planning application was then withheld from City • Council review pending resolution of the TIF negotiations . As we have discussed, we would appreciate reviewing the application and plans, including the preliminary and final plat, with the Planning Commission at their next scheduled regular meeting on May 4 . We would also appreciate reviewing the planning application with the City Council at their agenda session on May 2 , with a public hearing to be scheduled May 9 for the May 23 regular meeting of the Council. • Hopefully, during this same time-frame we will be finalizing a development agreement with the City concerning the tax increment financing for this project and the Hill project. We look forward to working with you on the Multi-Tech planning application. Multi-Tech and Everest representatives are prepared to meet with you at your convenience for plan review. Please feel free to call Scott Wylie at Multi-Tech (785-3500) , Project Architect Scott Nelson (871-6009) , or me if you have any questions concerning the application or planning submittals . Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, EVEREST DEVELOPMENT, LTD. Ti othy J. Nelson TJN: lc Enclosures cc: Scott Wylie Scott Nelson MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 371-93 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REZONING REQUEST OF EVEREST DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING CASE NO. 367-93 WHEREAS, Everest Development has made application to rezone the property located South of County Road H2 and Northeast of Highway 10 from B-3 , Highway Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the property is legally known as: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying northeasterly of U. S. Highway No. 10 , and the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, all in Section 8 , Township 30, Range 23 , Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the United States Government Survey thereof; and WHEREAS, Chapter 40 . 25 , Subdivision A(5) , provides that the Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. It further states that judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. Relationship to Municipal Comprehensive Plan 2 . The geographical area involved 3 . Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed 4 . The character of the surrounding area 5 . The demonstrated need for such use; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request in relation to the aforementioned criteria; and WHEREAS, the rezoning request is consistent with the City's current Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation for this property which is mixed use planned unit development; and WHEREAS, approval of the request will provide for a zoning designation which is consistent with the current and proposed land use. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the request to rezone the property legally known as: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying northeasterly of U. S. Highway No. 10, and the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, all in Section 8 , Township 30, Range 23 , Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the United States Government Survey thereof. Resolution No. 371-93 Page Two from B-3 , Highway Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission. directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes . Adopted this 1st day of December, 1993 . ATTEST: / Chairman i 1 (SEAL) Planner I MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 372-93 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST OF MULTI-TECH, 2205 WOODALE DRIVE, PLANNING CASE NO. 367-93 WHEREAS, Multi-Tech has requested City approval to construct a 59 , 970 square foot addition to their existing facility at 2205 Woodale Drive; and WHEREAS, Chapter 59 . 07 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a . development review be conducted for all commercial and industrial developments within the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this development proposal: 1 . Planning Application dated October 29 , 1993 2 . Site/Landscape Plan dated October 4 , 1993 3 . Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan dated October 14 , 1993 4 . Exterior Elevation Plan dated October 8 , 1993 5 . Floor Plan dated October 27 , 1993 6. Electrical Site Plan dated October 27 , 1993 7 . Illumination Distribution Plan dated October 27 , 1993 ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the proposal is in conformance with all applicable requirements of Chapter 40. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the development review request. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 1st day of December, 1993 . ATTEST: Chairman U (SEAL) Planner CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION A, , _:CAiNl . Mul,. -Tech S',s:ems , :nc. ^t. - ..' �cr'�e �7 S�-3cOO 2205 Wooda_e Dr_ve, Mounds View, Minnesota 331 .2 • Street Address, City, State, and Z!D Ccce Interest in Property (check appropriate box): Owner of Property • Contract for Deed Owner ` Lessee, Operator, Manacer r Acreement to Purchase -Portion of proper west of existing ... r_ t`: s-_ _= Multi-Tec Other (explain) proper:7 to be acquired from Commercial Proper_ Investments, Inc. Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in ;he property may be required before final Cly action cf this recuest. PROPERTY INVOLVED: Address/General Location 2205 Woodale Drive v and adiacent proper_ .:est ^er of Highway 10 • Lecal Owner: Name/AddressMulti-Tech ML Tech S•:steWs Inc . , and Commercial ?rope::v Investments , Inc. , 2685 Long Lake Road, Roseville, MN 55113 Present Use (check appropriate pox): G`; UndeveicpedNacant Single Family Dwelling • Duplex/Two Family Dweilinc Multi-Family (No. of Units Business/Commercial Establishment Industrial Establishment Portion of property currently developed wit h "_� Other (explain) parking and associated improvements se_ving Multi-Tecn's existing _ :act _ty a: 2205 Wooda: Property Classification: U Abstract [ Terrens - Drive REQUEST: Application for General Concept and Development State P.L.D. �- foot:O construc: 59 ,970 square foot expansion to ex Multi-Tech glarterSi�"..a;:..f aC:...r �-^a facility, existing o ....r�Orate ReaC- .✓, tv_ n Assoc-a-ed parking and site improvements: rezoning of acquisition parcel from 3-3 to P.U.D. E T vL� Sf`CT-`4S , -NC. I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE AB OVB STAT=ViBNT AF._ RUB. :1A:F* Signature ==xxxWx„x Rezoning 520C/acre, minimum S2CC. maximum 51,CC0 Psrx Fund Dedication ation Fee Variance F-I to R-2-575,ail ctners 5200 Date Paid • Conditional Use Permrt R-t to n-2-575, all ctners 5200 Receipt Number Cade Appeal 575 Daveioo./Site Plan Review $1 CC/acre, minimum CO.Tmaximum 5500 Add donai Fees Paid Minor Subdivision 5150 . Date Paid Major Subdivision 5250 plus 5250 eeocsit Receipt Number Comp. Plan Amendment 5200 Wetland Alteration Permit 550 plus deposit determined by Staff TOTAL FEES PAID /; - = • C • DATE Wetland cuter Permit 5t0 —PAID— _ � _ _ 1 Planning Sign 550 RECEIPT NUMBER —� PUD 5250 PUD Amendment 5150 Date of final acscn APPROVED DENIED TAE D C _ '.Date ✓ l—' i Planning PiCase �:.i 5 Admin. Account No. \' - Planning Application fees tozal' ing 31 , 100 are sill on file with Ci:y from priC7 I: i7a.-.-.:::-a.: . II I t ! I ?417,1 1"..2'''._ �/ I 5.a15 i 1 1; .° !2 I:. 1 ' _ �/ 179°S:7504i 7501 I I ( V ( 54:•' 1_4:c 1 5a151 15414 1^I -;-;e1!M1I - • 541-' 1 I^IM1 •a - Inll.-1til ^� 1.......... s4_51 ;5<;5 t,^,IN.N::;N, ,i 54051 1 -1 -.. ihI�.. •I �. I .-. I1„ iii .:+<Lh]ih I W 52951 I 1 -: c I N n i ^ - V I 94 hl IM1Ir°I.i �I I Z. i ry `ciot !ml I°_'5:1:3:' I` 5:1939' O _39t I 53871 )--395192971x[N. �I I NI ", NirfN irr.. N , I - !rv'—. - 1 • I'2 2�F 9281 I 5 50 i _3E'•Iii 1 I 1 r." I I [ 1 I��o6 —1 I,r --=!I 360 _ 1 y..I' =72 1 '<i I I I ( ! I ! i I i I I I..= , ,__3.,019_ =1 ••--_• W ,51 '�-oE I `3571 1 I I 1 (°3"�!°�y1!`I_`..:'r.!53T1 cic mll B-� 57 r —525-.91 I'S3f4 I I I f I I I ISSN' 364153E21 52,64153631 _La. R � ' 35� 11 52:.I I ( n m I I r i ; I i ..I 15.15815257) [5.58 1`..7_`.7 °3a 'c r • al — nil I 4 1 _ ';`....?";;••..7' n7Io cio_, Ic_ '15351) ):._215:5:)( 5<•- \`1 ..34.3 4} � I 5 ^5I 152-"I h I N I ,-.;:t::::',-.. I h 1-..4L:21 ti l i I L =J .,36 r _, �... AVG h `3�<13<2 1-.3 1-.3 153<: HE N S� !.2.Z.71 }iSi= ` `23 1 52`815371 .r/.Q` „ C\ 3I .!'V I NIN N I hI N i N I N 1 rY IN 1[V I=I-3�J ..2q 1522Ui�2.2...1 r � ''''''.;/ V S.i2Y NV\ I I I I • I 12�I53?•ISJh{`3415222 W_ / , 3091 n.; p� I I I i I- I I I 1521815.2151:15.216153/5 ` C. > 61° �4 . 99 36 1 `'' is I i i 1 I 1 1_308_l53G71LYI�:.E 1°3071 •;3. 1n 6f0 \x: 2^a1 L-',• .i I i I I I I I I $C1 I5200152951 I520015299 3v� -- 7.5 +�1JW' 9y cv2�7I ryl nl NiH � ri�I Ni r! .ni M1'`I =l .i c�•,io.i m� 1774.1.--77.11- .�111 1`_a.15252) -- LT S_ 1 ' CONI hl h ��. N' h I .til NI N INI h1 I��9_19-H `5•)0_1`__ _00 o 52751 __s7I 6-3 i _s H I - 522215/09 8-3 ,,,,i . in PUD 52 z.-.: 52901 52991 '4 � -' 5250152519i a 2801 m ;4A,0,1 152701 52791 l52.70r--.<\ ^ .'� 1�I I.25. 17-1,269,0 )525: 25Ci • `260 I ryc,�ALE ` ��rt �I�1 5250152591) [525CIc,cg c-,,,.._1.-2.52\ `2501 ! 1 NI NI 5240)52a9I1I 524015:49 52t0L.2< 12401 ' _ / `=n< , I n , 7 `_2..015239(,523015229 5230;5'391 52201 r,„_.7:- 11° r _ .... `--2 152291 --201522 <4�65229 2201 °- 5.�/ 4 1 i -,I -1 52101`_2191 .`.210[:2i;p5"101=219[ 5210, : /, i • , ! 1v NI N ' • �_2 0l5 oc r2oola2e91 r2�0!52:9 �52 I ! • ----5r. / pet I M1 N N [ _,__.f....-7g S r 1y) , N - , ,, /II —'-6 1 y �f 4� 1 / / • • • irPROPOSED AREA FOR REZONING • -3 TO DUD Nilr EXISTING MULTI-TECH S=__ (IVCL;DI::C E.-,:PANS IOti) EVEREST DEVELOPMENT LTD October 29 , 1993 Paul Harrington Planning Technician City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Re: Planning Application Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. Facility Expansion Dear Paul: I believe that under separate cover Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. , has submitted its Planning Application and related plan submittals concerning their proposed 59 , 970 square foot facility expansion. Enclosed as a supplement to that Application are fifteen (15) copies of narrative materials further describing the proposed expansion. We, and Multi-Tech Systems, request that you place this Planning Application on , the earliest possible meeting schedule with the Planning Commission and City Council. Our goal is to obtain all required approvals to permit a construction start as soon as possible yet this fall. We request your assistance and that of other City staff, Planning Commission and Council members in expediting the approval of these applications, so that Multi-Tech Systems' business growth facility expansion can be accommodated in Mounds View Business Park. As you know, tax increment financing negotiations for this project are ongoing and will , hopefully be successfully completed in the near future. We look forward to working with you on the enclosed Planning Applications. Multi-Tech and Everest representatives are prepared to meet with you at your convenience for plan review. Please feel free to call Scott Wylie at Multi-Tech, the project architect Scott Nelson (871-6009) , or me if you have any questions concerning the applications or plan submittals. 'h85 Lun,L.uc n oci li'( !:c m,,.IIIc%MN WH i Paul Harrington October 29 , 1993 Page Two Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, EVEREST DEVELOPMENT, LTD. Timothy J. Nelson Enclosures cc: Scott Wylie Scott Nelson TJN/jk • PIanning Application for Multi-Tech Systems., Inc. Facility expansion Submitted October 29, 1993 Introduction •The following narrative materials and information are submitted to supplement the plans and Planning Application submitted October 29 , 1993 concerning the proposed Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. facility expansion in Mounds View Business Park. In connection with the proposed expansion, Applicant Multi- Tech Systems, Inc. , ' is requesting General Concept and Development Stage Planned Unit Development approvals for the project, and rezoning of the expansion site from B-3 , Highway Commercial, to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D. ) . Project Summary The proposed Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. facility expansion includes a 59 , 970 square foot two-story brick building addition to be constructed principally on the west end of the existing. Multi-Tech Systems facility at 2205 Woodale Drive, and associated parking and site improvements. The architectural style, building materials, landscape treatment and intended uses of the proposedaddition are all designed to compliment and mirror the existing Multi-Tech facility. Multi-Tech Systems is a leading manufacturer of computer modems and related communications devices and is the leading employer in the City of Mounds View with 300 current employees . The proposed facility expansion is designed to accommodate Multi-Tech's anticipated continuing busienss growth and development in a high-image corporate headquarters facility. The expansion facility will be built by Everest Construction Company, for ownership by Multi-Tech Systems , Inc. DEVELOPMENT TEAM APPLICANT/DEVELOPER: Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. PROPERTY OWNER: Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. , and Commercial Property Investments, Inc. SITE PLANNING Dovolis, Johnson & Ruggieri, Inc. & ARCHITECTURE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Dovolis, Johnson & Ruggieri, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEER: Putnam Consultants, P.A. SURVEYOR: All Metro Development Consultants, P.A. GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Everest Construction Company REAL ESTATE BROKER: Nielsen and Associates Realty, Inc. LEGAL COUNSEL: James Lockhart (CPI) Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Doty, Ltd. Lawrence Brynestad (Multi-Tech) Jensen & Swanson, P.A. mvapp • multi-tech floppy • 1 DEVELOPMENT TEAM CONTACT INFORMATION DEVELOPER: Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. 2205 Woodale Drive Mounds View, 142I 55112 785-3500 785-3515 (fax) Contact: Scott Wylie PROPERTY OWNER/ Commercial Property Investments, Inc. SELLER: 2685 Long Lake Road Roseville, MN 55113 636-5500 636-0183 (fax) Contact: Tim Nelson or Rob Davidson SITE PLANNING Dovolis, Johnson & Ruggieri, Inc. & ARCHITECTURE: 1121 East Franklin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55404 871-6009 871-1746 (fax) Contact: Scott Nelson LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Dovolis , Johnson & Ruggieri, Inc. 1121 East Franklin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55404 871-6009 871-1746 (fax) Contact: Scott Nelson CIVIL ENGINEER: Putnam Consultants, P.A. 7441 Jolly Lane Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 425-1233 425-2033 (fax) Contact: Dave Putnam SURVEYOR: All Metro Development Consultants, P.A. 7111 West Broadway Suite 201 Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 566-8487 566-8517 (fax) GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Everest Construction Company 2685 Long Lake Road Roseville, MN 55113 636-5500 636-0183 (fax) Contact: Rick Anderson or Rick Baker DEVELOPMENT TEAM CONTACT INFORMATION (contd.) REAL ESTATE BROKER: Nielsen and Associates Realty, Inc. 2685 Long Lake Road Roseville, MN 55113 636-5500 636-0183 (fax) Contact: Rob Davidson LEGAL COUNSEL: James Lockhart (CPI) Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Doty, Ltd. 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower 222 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 333-4800 334-2781 (fax) Lawrence Brynestad (Multi-Tech) Jensen & Swanson, P.A. 8525 Edinbrook Crossing Suite 201 Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 424-8811 493-5193 (fax) Legal Description of Property P. I . N. 08-30-23-42-0001 and 08-30-23-42-0012 : That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying northeasterly of U. S . Highway No. 10 , and the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, . all in Section 8 , Township 30, Range 23 , Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the United States Government Survey thereof. Fee Owner: Robert H. Waste Contract for Deed Purchaser: Commercial Property Investments, Inc. , I . .(P . I . N. 08-30-23-31-0001 (part of) : That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8 , Township 30 , Range 23 , Ramsey County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of Section 8 ; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 37 seconds East, assumed bearing, 525 . 42 feet along the east line of said Southwest Quarter to a point on the north line of Trunk Highway No. 10 ; thence North 49 degrees 24 minutes 47 seconds West 105 . 00 feet along said north line; thence North 40 degrees 35 minutes 13 seconds East 30 . 32 feet; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 37 seconds West 217 . 66 feet; thence North 12 degrees 59 minutes 23 seconds East 133 . 36 feet; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 37 seconds West 86 . 77 feet to a point on the north line of said Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 26 minutes 01 seconds East 30 . 00 feet along said north line to the point of beginning, Ramsey county, Minnesota. Fee Owner: Commercial Property Investments, Inc. P . I . N. 08-30-23-42-0011 : Lot 2 , Block 1, Mounds View Business Park 2nd Addition Fee Owner: Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. Existing Site Conditions The Multi-Tech expansion site consists of approximately 12 . 19 acres of land, exclusive of County Road 11-2 right-of-way, with approximately 870 feet of frontage on the north side of Highway 10 and approximately 650 feet of frontage on the south side of County Road H-2 . Added to the existing Multi-Tech site of approximately 5 . 68 acres, the total expanded Multi- Tech site will be approximately 17 . 87 acres in area. The expansion site is bordered by County Road H-2 and residential properties to the north. To the east, the site is bordered by Woodale Drive and Buildings E (Multi-Tech Systems) and F within the Mounds View Business Park. Bordering the site on the south is Trunk Highway 10, and to the west is the Saturn automobile dealership. The site also contains, in the southeast corner, Pond "C" , an aesthetic and storm water drainage pond installed during the development of Phase I of Mounds View Business Park. This pond, approximately 1. 5 acres in surface area, was sized, engineered, and located to handle all the drainage from the subject site, in addition to some of the drainage from developed properties to the east. The pond is subject to an . existing drainage easement. The site slopes slightly in a north to south direction and has been the subject of engineered filling to bring the site up to the approximate grades of adjacent developed properties. Current zoning of the expansion site is B-3 , Highway Commercial . The existing Multi-Tech building site is zoned P. U. D. Site Accessibility Primary access to the Multi-Tech expansion site will be via the existing driveways and curb cuts from Woodale Drive serving the existing Multi-Tech building. This access provides full site ingress and egress at the Woodale Drive intersection with Highway 10 . No additional direct access from Highway 10 is currently planned for the proposed expansion. One driveway access point 'is proposed at County Road H-2 in the northern area of the site, for automobile traffic only. All truck traffic serving the Multi-Tech expansion site will enter and leave the site via Woodale Drive and Highway 10. Site Development Plan - P.U.D. Concept and Development Stage Site planning for the proposed "Multi-Tech expansion is driven by the desire to maintain the high corporate image of the existing Multi-Tech facility, with the addition to be consistent with the existing building in architectural style, building materials, and landscape treatment. The proposed addition would extend westerly approximately 160 feet from the west wall of the existing building, taking advantage of the excellent visibility and exposure to Highway 10, with views overlooking the ponding area at the northwest corner of Highway 10 and Woodale Drive. The total floor area of the addition is 59 , 970 square feet, consisting of a small (3 , 500 square foot) . single level addition in the truck dock area at the northeast corner of the building, and a two-level west addition with 28 , 299 299 square feet on the first floor and 28 , 171 square feet on second floor. The addition represents an 81% expansion of the existing building floor area of 73 , 724 square feet, for an expanded total building area of 133 , 694 square feet. The building elevations feature continuation of the double banded window pattern of the existing building, with the addition of a second two-story sky-lit atrium entrance symetrical with and identical to the main entry of the existing building. The existing building is served by 268 parking stalls . The proposed building addition will require the removal of 101 stalls . Construction of 346 new parking stalls will result in a net gain of 245 stalls serving the addition. Total parking spaces available after the addition will be 513 stalls, for a ratio of 4 . 26/1, 000. Site landscaping is to be provided consistent with the existing Multi-Tech site and the remainder of Mounds View Business Park. The landscaping includes a variety of evergreen and ornamental species to provide year round color. The landscaped berm constructed along County Road H-2 as part of the Phase I development will be continued along the northern' portion of the Multi-Tech expansion site. Site drainage will be handled by catch basins in the paved areas and piping to the existing drainage pond in the southeast corner of the site. Delivery service to the building will continue to be provided at truck docks located at the northeast corner of the existing building. The east wall of this dock area will be moved approximately 45 feet further east to allow for a 3 , 500 square foot expansion of the receiving area. No additional truck docks are proposed to be installed with the addition. Other Public Decisions/Approvals Necessary for Implementation of Proposed P.U.D. Plan Rezoning of Acquisition Site from B-3, Highway Commercial, to Planned Unit Development P.U.D.) The so-called "Waste" property which Multi-Tech intends to acquire from Commercial Property Investments, Inc. , to accommodate its expansion is currently zoned B-3 , Highway Commercial. Applicant requests that the acquisition/expansion site be rezoned from B-3 to Planned Unit Development (P.U. D. ) to accommodate Applicant's intended use of the property for office, manufacturing/production, and distribution/ warehousing. This requested rezoning is consistent with Applicant's use of its existing building at 2205 Woodale Drive, and with the current P.U.D. zoning in place for said property and the other developed properties within Mounds View Business Park. Tax Increment Financing Approval Applicant acknowledges the separate application for "Pay-as- You-Go" Tax Increment Financing assistance submitted by Everest Development, Ltd. , in connection with Applicant' s proposed expansion. Applicant acknowledges that approval of a tax increment financing agreement between the City and Applicant and/or Everest Development, Ltd. , will be required to proceed with Applicant's proposed expansion. . Building Area Summary (in Square Feet) Second Gross Building Floor Floor Building Footprint Area Area Existing Multi-Tech 52 , 156 21, 568 73 , 724 Proposed Addition 31 . 799 28 , 171 59 , 970 Totals 83 , 955 49 , 739 133 , 694 Land Allocation and Coverage Calculations • Multi-Tech Existing Site: Approximate Site Area 247 , 518 Building Footprint Area 52 , 156 Building to Land Coverage: 21% Parking and Drive Area 114 , 016 (46%) Surfaced Area of Site 166 , 172 (67%) Open Space and Green Area 81, 346 (33%) Combined Existing and Exnansion •Multi-Tech Sites: Approximate Site Area (excluding County Road H-2 right-of-way) 841, 628 Building Footprint Area 83 , 955 Building to Land Coverage: 10% Parking and Drive Areas 212 , 568 (25%) Surfaced Area of Site 296 , 523 (35%) Open Space & Green Area 545, 105 ( 65%) • Maintenance of Common Open Spaces The Multi-Tech expansion site will include common open spaces (e. g. parking, driveways and landscaped green areas) that will be owned, cared for and maintained by Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. , as the property owner. The site will also include the existing Pond "C" drainage pond which will continue to serve the Multi-Tech property and other adjoining properties, to be maintained by Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. , as owner, subject to the existing Pond Maintenance and Assessment Agreement of record. Phasing Schedule The Multi-Tech Systems expansion project is proposed for construction commencing fall, 1993 , as soon as necessary project approvals can be obtained, with completion by spring, 1994 . .,s F r ii: El S}. iil i Qi i .0 / i ' ill 1:; . {7 ., . SQ Caig,? L t',A Y g Q Im / FR :=� ;.x 4 r' m / c O�vmn Icn ry > <,•+ .,Xm CD I ,— .,:i E.; �a.. :� a.,.7 0 .S �.i i �i S i„ .`. �O�- ,� O oen r:> x x c I I pis :i >y ' Litt f i' / 0;---,v,,;,--: T -��N. V1 Vly I� *{ m or c¢ 0 iq.',. , F/ eY i>'ll 0; yt: i Y ! ,O / < 'tom 'r 5Ci A; O m 7»> >cEi O • j '+' I / m o y o ?coo ^� 'sa r yD>ok,- o00 :¢ m rn NNx^-0-rn D X >zzz ccc D is - - / r m --1>_m 7 Soo -+Nr D / > ... z,nmN> O +�Vv C,.. -a 00 --, 1 / i ,1 a;� oy 1 x Ik / • IL�IV,I;P,NIN I�1'.D �• 'f11N jNli.• IVIN IN 1 • p,v�l_�,�iN;;N la. 4 :OIC ICs :mi.-IN 1. •^ / 11 4 ItOI ,OVINI0 VINi� , �.1 / - - - �'ii*-- – – -f iin mINi� o �lo amimia .. N %t ] r, INN LA. NIN NI^, ,doiV, / .---1.-.,-.. `c ' ICN If.iN 1 1:7ijI: Nv • C \ .5 > \ „ rn =rte n j , i 71. i > dr \ -----__ ai11?1 `i- (---- \ ',..0 ' . -.. __________ 14.1., O' j 1` ��;.°_- 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IyI I I Iy i„ I I I I I I I I--'I I i I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I 1 J(.ic_ /7 . ,\ Q 1'�"'7J. ;gs'1111 1111! 11111111 [TI 1111111111 1111111 ia111 11111 1 I il) / \ ' ry< �a ..;IIII IIIIIIIIlllilt' iilIIIIIIIIIIIIII III I 1 ;T) :j $a z I 4.--? l`.- �-_�o `y 1 111111)1111111111 rn RX 1 1 1 1 1 1 hI I I I I 1 H I i I I I I I I I I Is 4=,' 1 Z` /'' of z _ � lu�lllllllllllllll!IIt X31111111111111 II1111111I1Ir �_..;�_ ` r •7 `` �_`' '_�`7�'± 1111111 1111111 I I I III 1 1 /4` \.. .,..,... ,.v_,., _ „<__ a1. I I,. 1111 I I I I I I I I I I I I l I '. L te '/. � .11.. �l - T i ri -- .X.,, a!:>73 rt m . ,, (, EF ' ir I ( DQo i i''/ I— L-�—, ! p Z / ' (_ mnm qs — lau i - I I I \�\\• j ,I.-, = ' moi ' I1. Al �.` 71-- m L7 � � x c I N Tn h v m -- (. ) © Ij T / - c t I — � z I 7 0 PI I I ;ii I 1 V1 — \ 1___11, I u 1 1 1 )Xql .---) -- - 0,11111111, Li[ I• ( ._.__,---„_._. L--) 6 1 f HII1111111-1! 111111111 1 1 I s f I 8 _ _ OUNICY STREET a L �\ / -N,„ ( ( \ vir/ ii LIC*r1Ynl .1 ...... EI6~�"1st, II AfultiTech Systems ��� =- ( ;j{f �I //y�\� FL.^ c/� - 225 ><ooddale Drive No`unoe View. Lrnne.oi. 11;1 ®� ! !{ I�.1 `\! l-� f 1� h.1± �t .�.. yy nT la! I .e 1;,,I•'lri: cite/Lancs c2De PlanI. n I _.✓. / , , . / / / • / / I '.... A. . ! J , ! . ft. I, ! • I • 4 I 4 I ... . . e..• H., • .------, ,_.-..., • •• .. •-..-____._______.,___s\ ..„.. . '.--.7._______. • i .1--. ...•cl..f", iI: .. . .. .. ....- I ••`\ 1 :3.frs1 .! .• ';;i•Zs.4----'. • ''''' I\ 7 . ' •Ic `.;\ \\\\( 1 • -.. %,-, ',F0 Pk. . ..,,r I,,,. 2 „ • '1''.: i , • \t\\ ?t,• , t ' t4 \II: 1 I , IJJ .11 •••7 •••7 ',. . . ! ,.;I ..--- • s;'- ty= -t-r _'—'7------__________, • • r • N, ! / I 7 il/g. i IN ...,........i4.....-- ,..,•-•.... r.: ' / - / H2,A ' . % ....7-il:-------------._a•. 1Iti •,,r.II ij A ,... ,..r.,.. ,...............„11".. . . , 'il . I •••• t : ". j NI . '''... A s c'9 g•.--i i ''s - .. .., .... — ( ) " Ips- . II a FM. w % = i / I IP ; . . i 7 li x . v) .--, .7, I \ ‘ i Fl 1 1 %. LI t. '....''., '. 1 r-I .4•-:-4 . - n .\ ' '.----1 ' h-• wrni r---: I so - . P> = 1- I oor.(Aw <F-- _0 z (;) --I . 7. "• a; I 1 t. z = \ • . 14 •.t.' I; 11:. I I z'l • \ • t! -7, , ..._.. . , _ 7 I IT : li lli. I ii i i . .t, i MAN,:Y S'TREE 7 • i ; 1.. i A :i. 7.1 TibLTITECH SYSTEMS 2 220 Rooddsie Drive 1,4ouncif Vie.. Minnesota 1 II,--- (11 L.7-4-....--,-----—•-•—: i I.? -_11:1, ..„...::::—.7.-:.-:...-.-..-.:..7-1 I iI, :.F..05 I . ..C •III II:.......-- - :::-< I . I C) MT.L,-... •I ..\ 1 GRADING, DRAINAGE, EROSION CONTROL lii! i: i.,', — _____:___ 1 ;I 1 c._z_,, 1 A. A ,/ --..... 1 .._ --••---_____, • .. . f / 1. . . / 1. I I I . liniCi> ;7'.7ii I , / .• 1 1 0101:-.3!01311 / 1 tilLI.MICP.. :Z.' / ..,•.,... • , I:•''-' ./ . •-i:.-I . I 1 1 .1:-• • / ../. ririrLI'7' . , qa- Inie,/itz ci' .44* / / \% I1tt1 -..-_ _----- : ! : :! : :.!>,:.-11`1 • • / ti t - 1- - s-5i r''-- • i , -----......„..1 • 1 , • 0' i ,.-- I I 1 1 kl .la .Igi81' --or./- //// 7711 71 , • --,_________ I 1 111111\ 111 , •-t . : ii t ;\' ) \ I t (-- \\,. .' 1.=i-Ti ., I 1 -11-i'l 1 i 71 iTitTri',77-7731714-11 i L\ j , /// /7 if ^Ill WIWI wiliir ril77p-H-1- 71-11111 'Hi ri i • / ,, // / J — ,, in1 • 1H111111111IL ! rilliiiilliiliiiiiiii iiiiiu /. , D:Ekc . • • =i--- • I .1 III il - iiiiwillimitiliiiiiiiiiiin i // 1 1 1 11 117,41111 III _ U-1117.111111111111111117,4011111 ,. ) C= --)R0101R1111111111111111111 1111111111111111-11111111111 : ,1 • < 1115. —I-- ,-----• , • . -ON- tp . / , . . ,, /---4.-1- • i. 1,), : "•1-1— I . / aD • .4c,‘ / *; / •1 11 `0 / *,/1-, • e 0 _ N, . , / ----• i • \\ _________ ____i 1,_ • \ ,,, j ii_r. L=F1_, ( , 1 _ I (7., E '-'--------_,If; 1,—• —exiav 1 S 1. . 0 ---, s• IN m 1 I\\\\\ 0-4 , \ , \IIF- \ ,Y_ (44 f _ I 2 CI 1..2 ti.:-: . . ,i 111. CI i \ iE) . I....3 , I---.--- . I \ • r t —4— ' I . , --........, ,,A 1 11) _ ... 1._____J. 1 ' . 1 , ) 1 -7---, U1111111-r- . _____..---•___ -7 lEt. t i L ' ( IE \ H 1 , 1 111111111 IT -1 q I , 1 i_______i ) u 'li I ,., l.jc .• 1----—-—-—-—-—-aUtilEY.--5•TRE-E7---—-—-—-—-—- ' ;*. ir:;1 I • r / '-' - IgIJI I k ILECTIZIC.41. sm. PlAN ' I...ay,r....?........0.w . MULTITECH SYSTEMS 4m.16 1:011-11 alciLlM lr ----wr ar.rim...., KUL-CI TK P.D. We"••••••••••=,er...Wet I on 0,IOW",EL= 2205 WOODDALE DRIVE L.._. c-r- Fz2 I C •..7•-•,••••-...-.........•- .3...u.•fft IC teIG • C..••••••••-•••wow......11•••••4. C3334,1.12:16441.33. r, 1 .2.•co 40 1,_.....me fcs.oft NC ...cz.....C) "." viA:r..4,7, / 'Lb%rermu7=4:: s...e.6.,L.. 1..4• 44..11 10 -c _4_.,' .g. .r........:.._. •r.x„.....I., ---. I- -. ?,,,,, .Y. 3: ..0 pY.D;,... t , ,,=, -,_... .j.„ .. .._.... • • • A I 1 i A a; c T b c' ■ K Th I ,-' P °ate � ' wk.i0:1 )f I\ all• c4 13 0'. // ....\ __-., • li*Atle 1 ii yr/i .� :�.��i'� ii A+, � '0 I; ititiasr4 Fr.!.C7.71:35.1Martfilfitle Slitienklial .1 , q• o .: air-14;;;;;',S.1.;,:,11 i 1161"11 lift'taMtfivivilarAgor . . . ,/- . -- c,. .if,4.4........,ir• :•..,41....: siumw-,,,out...--,,,b,samii...01,,amdtalr,„.,___ ___„„iiini , A.-- - ' .., . / ,, Lao,w,,7.5idianosstram------- I . r ---- --- ----"Emm----- . h --'-'• ..N, ".. \ 7 // lot viw-- up, fir : /. I MriffAMICLineine,ariiinYnniaMIN9Ititairelititi-alpallInklialk ' ulor- � r ti\\ \i' p , , •, _ _ \ Z. CI I i A /11 k...:n . i :, . ‘.....k .6 I i ''I } � iiM`^'od S C ' 1g i • Li ` n IC R . IN ii; \ ill u [1 ,. \ A -- II T IIIIYI ( Illlfll!! IIII11 J is \ �/ pp9 \ _ (-- ��5 _i i C r""una 's"Ja"e ux MULTITECH SYSTEMS ,"'••'.....,--'"ow '-' 2205 WOODDALE DRIVE ��p>H�►mT —1 N-" Cir,o•T QM "°n`� ELcCTR1C �•��MM ..'u s�oo L.+so.Ic ..o..o "•r."+i•� wiPOMO n S . r...0 L. w•• ee, 1 0 .:1't---......7. •. OF C'G tr 'In1I, IN. .ps1.011•v Imo. _ 3r�^;..r.:ei ...s�—�.•.00 ... ,a.,.. -GC` — in"*"C am ii ‘--- II II H li il li , - 7 ^7 -','- '.:' 1 '' ' 1! ii II II I I I fl ' -.7' ---, :;11 till= -ikii •:t. :,_-- .1,E1-77. -.1.M 1 ,--;.51,) .4--F,•::Ell_As . ., ' .-i :-...-1.11..-r--3.-..r4i Eli- f ‘.0 ; r,T. ,D . n ....._..... ........ ••__•• •......... • .- ... -,iw........24- ...... lb. gm„,,,..-1,4mi ,..rm ......., ......, i 1,1,-.1,1 ......... r ,..,,-....in. ,ii._...7--_..iing -F,,,, c•E I . , :.,-, z •A' i V' -'.--. .--.-- ..7, II< 1 ..m W..,4__.--1-- • ......-..4 ..-..: liP 0.14--- Im •:-..:z. -,cp 4.:',!1111-, . -- :10 1 *t 4 i . :p -t•-..a '....-.vr ,171 '.,,--1.-I=------72--.ilQ "l'-' '111- i•g. !! 1 ri .t ,-,1.7) 1 ui.1.•:- ti ;1 -,-- 7,C--- • I : -...... t.•:I.N: ...., , 5;0 •",= r.."..,T=-= "M L. :. -- .-.7-'' ' '- -- .-,tn 1 rn -.. • - , • 7 4••••= wn-vaz......-... ,....... ,,,,,.... =6. .....,.... flk...s. , .. i 7- = _ , rri rz,=-_ .......1,4,..,-4----... ••-- _Ii..,,,, - i'-ri ' if t,:tv < „ = TY**•-' woo.. 11> 1 < .i.t,..,',1 , t ; i III IIM rn =a 4.• 1.4 • • ••• N.4.4,-41 k I 11 ;'-•.•iii/V: ...,___ ,,,,,,,,=-•• atr= * 1.• T.:,,,i,- t :-. ' .....•.„.„,a ylel, .11), - ie.* we ..,....a: . :,,1 ._, .0„,..„-44 e _• I .7, HI - '...-.:.: "= MI .AI 0 tk., ;• ... 1:: 0 1 •r, - . , -;-- - 7 • T ., 1.'*'''' ...'"'"' 10 ..... ....• ., 11z- .7:4,,,7.:4. ,i .,, _ 1•7:111w- - ")' VW wow,* ow, ".:tie.' • i !-'t reli' ... 1 4... •_ •,24-nm g NOM sat '-' lg. ,is Ay% - ''il' ._,.. ... - r ' - ...5..-,,, .11 t •.,4•.*:' •.!c.mtli. or':'al , I :' • I =__,....._ 4. IIIIIII........... I_ -...,-_.•.-( .• ::. ,..,, _ ,.0 I LI . iiik .1'..a t, . . .•: 1 PII I . '$.r , yalie• ,,,. .. •!.-.:•.".. .1 i';-le.,,,: E, 14 lig;'..iu,' tite.,,t.. ,4 1 !air 1 m ,....... --...-" •,....... ,.,..,, .i.•. ..., i . la 11111 Hftv.....,II = 0•••••....• ......• .".II .'III = 1 if ,- •,• ''. • (,.1 - ..,&.•'. . .Z 0 ,. .11,.._,-• ....................... u rt ...•. '4=--1 r • r.• =L.• "II It„....,...,IN (. :.)'•-• .1;.J i :' ‘IIIIIP'''.. ...:.:,...:.• ii..A.-z, , Ma •••••••••=_ ......„.... 1 ,..'I.' I 1 _ ii--i W.Z •••• ••'g ...+14. n'''--IM- .-- a: 2:: •-• \..) • * , , .• , •,,, ,,,..,, •- =E :-...-=E = •••••- a . tirl ,..= _... ::::"... =.- - r4 3= ''... MI ..al t‘•:P.,:;'. :4 v,,,.••• -• ..... ..,..,:,.=--• v.= - r--.'I .., I i2 - t';.••4: • >s ,' :I i .... I C• !• 1111! ?1, • , ... 1.10."111 ...... •t . ;•-•_.... li; 1 .„,,:...--_-• PS:1,: ,c. - .m.,-ilif.. , a 1).'•••••, )• 1== - 111171W.f-: m /1111E- M ;:) _7'1 ••••••• 1 - i; 0 .,-,.,. ',4, ,,,,1 c• 'A I A. .......: , i.-..4", t 44 N MI ---'--'=."', II .- •• it 11 7•7.1 I Ile: 1 , i A I ?0r..:Z..,.' { . II i:•.. V.-1...., :Mb. =•S.IIIII; U m....M. ...,...,......- ,......; , ...gm if., ,NI E.• r.64. 1: 1 .:..1. W Ill 4"1•:="4• '''"t•'•"*.** 1 linrw., IIII,Z,7 , ''•Kt) ... '. . '-I •• n)• .. -, :.,,•:::. i.4sarf, =- •--,v--,_ ..=-„ ?. Illi -...=.„„ -, ,...: ..., .., v,,,,_E-r.,- -...„-zz,41,---. •-•„,-. '.„„,, 1 ( I i -1111 ...,,E1 ' _ r- • pe,0 = ,,<•1 rn .. ,, (., ,,...._.... ................,=.-.... 4,....... . k''' "''''''-'- ";• •w re,e,117, R, iti , u • 4."."... ,% 4'ilit 1 4.44=-••••. ..,4t4r,V,4,G-- 4,4., 1-i .b. , .. :, 1,111.... j , , --..-2.--L,---1-_---------'-.4-_, t."--1.1,-,,-.7-_,==. ,, :Y.-. . •;:r:..1 x •,,w,,71. .I.,.: -:. -i- ,A I 7 .81...:••'. .,,,:...F.,,z4 L:7._ :,••• '-irT72.47 .. ii.I ,,,,,•:-,.• * -AI,.• .• .. .,. •.,., f k '5 ---.. 1,..,.........117Q7.411F-=:. •r (CI I 1, X inCgi it I ••••:'' ' ''' 5,•:''',.1, ',$ ). ::111:4 1 ••:•••WI'.r....r.1...-.1,..1.-,....... I ...1.. kL7.41.11:,,---..- 1! ; Milk l',7, .'1 -.I--.) s4L.?•?: 4 ,e, -.Lek:: .-;.k. 2 ".:4*,••r - :. .... I Ras 4--- .0,1,•-•,- irge/i. ,;, ,• --1-aii44 I .1 .. :121111. MIA ........, „,...,„„, _ 1,....:.:L._.,.1: , , z.,....,-,..5 •o - •P ...I.,,,,L.: ..1 . .. A U .7... .t 1 j' n' ..sic/... :.i '. * INITIf. i 0.115.".•..1'....iz.m.., 11 Emil - '-i •..,;-.4.4,i,,'... 1 --.i.tiV.:;.-; if >,.......&.:71...zt ,I. .:.„...„.:, Hi .,:-, ,,,,, .'•4 f (-_,, a f-I =.1iI1!Le if w,,42-Vii t rD i tc 0•14i*•& 4 7.144111? 'Flme-al.t.'' ''.'' .• - •;1 •:, t 70 1 1( z.....- •• v.... / .. lilt'..1j.V 1,... it.. 44 Al Li li 10 l'i /F 1 ti ... M 1 i r•44174W 1=1 1 t i r.. li WI RAO' ,4 ••.::••. • in..- ;••:. .1 ,., Yi „:„..) ii mum..of -.a_..... ,,i.4 (79-1 ' -I t• . 41# I (fii .40.`: 4•::.•.4 ;. , F, ... ;il 1 '..;ii.-.• r.bri,fl- t.i'l lit' t fl'ili ; ' i. Mt.w ' .,- •,...7 a :4;117., .(';• •Is ' • ,l'e=•.•il :: . • ;ix 1 fil" -1 11,1110ilh gilte y: Itt Q a , J , - --, 4a, ii r':11111r.). r 3,E illihi 1=-1 I I Hili1101111 I 1.1 1 111)1 1 - , If-l-11) , N _ '..N. ?••• ' H ' L.2.,. it'l lrn 11 1 1 1 I ji I I ; ,...., •-•'.ill . t.or, 2, _.t4i....t, .14-'(1425i - IZ 1 11> I •!I, I • KP III I.111111. .1 II IViI nia) 1 li q.45: I', ,,,-EN.:.:• ,1., ,',Ur; - 11-31° ili ii ii,,,i .-4 .- Veil.in j ,41.111 .11 ji I 1 1 1 iii lig I II> 4,14141 • 1 '''7ti 1'. .. ...... ... 1,AsE-:. .. - II- 17 th.111pilliiii. i li"i'l 1 , ;it!",.=ttil tilt ' •,..1 II, tn Iz illlt illittilill i iliiili :in WI if 1 c,,.' --,...P.:th,....1 .....,,vi iiii•-•1•••••:,tilt. •-•,:i. .,.0,i g il> 111,124 ill Ill 1 1 • 1.1 ti• ll'ill, I .. Itli.H1p;:!1,11' pm,.?.:11. - a: IX '.41111i.."1( ‘,. ..(:'• i 1‘.. :,+. 1141 :. I. 1111111111111111111 ' •i I il ill I. r6 ill 1 z IP 011Plitilitl!Iiiii , i!lii ,L oll[=11 s l. 1 1111 I ...0.-' ' ';: . ,, c. A ! ''''i• ill I In t, . , 1111 1 11111 1111111 ;II i i , ...g,v40111,11. 1 1 • I i l< I i ...... ,,,.. ' I 1 IO -- 1 '-'1111111111111lic ' ---'-'4 1, i I ,I , If ildi il 1111 I i: Ili i ill L__.,••.;,:,• „.. ..1 1.4 .i. !7 . tt tP ji II_ ,, if q ir:1'A tP 41.. lir--11- If I I t-- 11 .9t I! I! ........... ... !!_lt ''''''. -- - 211M I,. I; NfULTITECI1 SYSTEMS I .--_--__:...-::-_-:_-.-.7..-.-7- ; i '1_1\ :II =- .1, - 2205 Rooddale Drive Mounds View. Minnesota tii 1:''.2:- --.---." I t_ 1 1 I .E...-\-.4- 11I1I \\ =--,--,•:-'=--:- 'k.:..' RIOR ELEVATIONS „ ii --,., ,,,.--• I ' _ I ! __ 1. i i. I 1 I __ 1 1rl .. If i � '� 7,c7.,_.....717..„..1, _ IIII ` I !I I �i HL' : I_. I ' 4_ , m ,_ .. , IL. I1 ... , _ I ! I„ ,., ! 8 1LP — . -i r m ; I�i4-4O kQ i -y - 99I I -6 a -- - - - - - - -'--- •- ---- II;.I/ ( , A -C_� I . _ , .-- ,— G1 Ii - • iI tI i! t--- - ;-A I Q 1 °-rn 1 i j IzI DZ 8II_ • -4i ___ ._ _ _ . f1. _l v /_ _ I . Rm Ia;' .. _ _I4. (_ I - • m CI ai I I 1; I; - m I I 1 ;jrv E � •11 E i;1 rEri � . — i ml — - fr -a I E — Io NI Q ' I I I `1' E i F 'rn y t. .{nI— - —! :.-.-.:.:r - _ —.`l T. ..v,1.� - --- !; Z 6. (..... -Z--,.,.:.., -- — , "_—_ - i rg t j I it ,.: I- l F ' .'jI I I Ir��JJ`M`�I 2.3 ! i i P ) 1 , 1 A ;Ell El Y' - } I i El - I fi T ---11-7 - _- - - I s 1 J _ _. _. _-- - .. _ 73, 1 I i I ,.. >.' ,-.,. 1 ... 1 11] I i Cl Ory ° ss nl i - -1 - --- - i ---- I °1 n y ra. I O l __. N li 9 - - I - - I � m 4 ng ar( o — 7 - _ L. r . -I- -'� -Isl °• �=-i __�1_} [79 .. - -- - - - I: •a• A 4� I I p I i 1 0 I;I -I3 '1 -'- ¢11...-1J1 11 j. . aq 1 _ - Lj —___ -J_-lr.- - (S) 8 L. La ..4 5 .. • --- I - I.I IR, p L r D �� 3 I . r I I; A I n '�y I I I. ° • Z I� L I —I 7 f __.,..._ _ , I y) 7E I I 1 r r -1.34 1 r t„ T L__ _ -, .. 8 — ,-.1 ^ . .� _ ' IrD 1 [ I 1 I 1 ° CI iy -----t `L 1 v lililh: El.:3 i I I a^ I i� II vi..: I=1; , y:; I li, . , . j 4 I y� y rg f j "!1:..1 DI._. ��i I I I k I;• 33 II Ig i s s s, -�11 I r $ ., 'li i '$I r! • `�' (I' . I ( r c II4 IS LI I 1 � 1 j 1f_ I I� 1 1�1 Iii 1�! `i.l '•jyI ;II (i I • :1 ,fit ,2, ,1 , u �u . 'n Ir,' 1 , • i;;"lal�l MULTITECH SYSTEMS • Fi! =_ :1' 'l. /`7 �'�� ! D I e 'i Z205 Rooddaie Drive Mounds Vito, Minnesota 'i1 t •`.�. ; a tJ \ A'�'� I' ;r • ..... l I i..... _� 1a1 i_ \V �a0 iIiI;.;• IXI I FLOOR PLANS is, ..-,__— !f I - I, _`'^ ORDINANCE NO. 540 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CHAPTER 802 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY ADDING PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON A PORTION OF BRONSON DRIVE BETWEEN THE HOURS OF AND The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. The Mounds View City Code, Chapter 802.08 is amended to read as follows: Subdivision 2. Specific Areas, 9:00 P.M. to 2:00 A.M.: No person shall stop, stand or park a motor vehicle on the following sections of City streets between the hours of nine o'clock (9:00) P.M. and two o'clock (2:00) A.M., except as otherwise authorized by this Code or unless directed to do so by a police officer or traffic-control device: • Edgewood Drive, between Woodale Drive and County Road H-2 except adjacent to 2400 County Road H-2; Greenfield Avenue, between Woodale Drive and County Road H-2 except adjacent to 2400 County Road H-2; O'Connell Drive,. between Jeffrey Drive and Greenfield Avenue; Clearview Avenue, between Irondale Road and Edgewood Drive; Bronson Drive, between Edgewood Drive and except adjacent to 5394 Edgewood Drive. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its publication. Ordinance No. 540 Page Two Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1994. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1994. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ; REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDER .TION Agenda sec=oa: 11.D 111 ;;� y Bear:Number: 94-1180C STAFF �� ,�` Repan Date: 5-19-94 ...: Courci Aeon: C Specai Order of Busi e: May 23, 1994 C Public hearings CITY COUNCILS ET3�i IG DATE C Consent Agenda fiC Council Business Item Description: Consideration and Formal Introduction of Ordinance No. 540 Prohibiting Parking on Bronson Dr've Between Edgewood Drive and Jackson Drive Admizustrator 3 ReviewiRecommendation: - No comments to supplement this report f '. . 4 - Comments attached. ExplanationiSumimarj (attach suppiem,ent sh -— as necessary.) ST?MM ARy; At the April 4, 1994 City Council Work Session, Staff brought forward a . request from the resident, at 7504 Greenfield Avenue regarding the possibility of imposing further on-street parking restrictions • on the . streets surrounding his property. The request was the result of the resident seeing an increase in loud and obnoxious behavior, littering, parking on lawns and public urination by (he says) the patrons of the Bel Rae Ballroom. Staff had the Mounds View Police Department run a list of the calls received within the past year on the Bel Rae and found that the large majority involved health emergencies, abandoned vehicles and lockouts. Following discussion at that meeting, Staff was directed to contact the property owners who would be directly affected by a ban on parking on Bronson Drive between .Edgewood and Jackson Drives' . Interested parties will be in attendance on Monday evening. Staff has also prepared the attached Ordinance for introduction by the Council. Please note that the exact areas to be included in the parking ban and, the applicable hours have been left blank - this will allow the Council to take into consideration the testimony of the affected parties prior to taking action on the proposed Ordinance. 1-2 / / 11 (__ . Paul Harrington, Co7unity Development Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading and formally introduce Ordinance No. 541 prohibiting parking on a portion of Bronson Drive. 'm 7719 7721.< //.5lI _L.._ N N NIM \ve 5533 5532 553 553.��PINEWOOD—`D4 - 7710 7709 771 s 0. 7721 7715 _�j N R n rn M 552 552. 552 5526 G ,c o .tfj;77:7: o.o t0 n tp to 7700 N 770177 � 7701N N N N N 5521 CM N N NN'NPi • CO RD I ,i co N737: a Y , 0 10'Ci a M N Y o On O O "O r2 FS ^ n.-rnnin N NM M ') co N 55 •' nt0 t0 c0,0 MAN N 2553 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .. in`ONO M NN NNN 255. 'N N N N ,D Z • 766C< to t ) 5497 55'. N 2549 0 766E 7660 ;7/ o to N 5491 5472 2547 J 764 7658 N N N N 2545 OR 7661 54' N 7641 76562541 6s GROBERG ST 25397610 — 7639 7644 7651 5480 547925377622 7640 7624� 0 7635 7630 5474 5473 5468 54 7 7E45 7626 0 7625 7628 7641 5468 5467 5464 54, /-9 D A 401 761 7610 _T 5462 5463 . . . . 7624 w = to 4 �� ti�'h na° Mn° 763 SSO 7618 W 7 ` T N 5445 5454 5455 C n 7581 7580 7531 :� 5446 5447 Q pt. GE' I 5440 a 7565 7564 0 _ _ 5441 SR '•, > h10 N uoi N W 7521 Y ; 5434 5433 JS 1 �� N N a N 7551 7550 •Z �>tS ti<0 N Z 5426 5425 x 7535 7534 w 7511 5420 5421 7521 7520 �* 0 5414 5415 Migilla ,7, r N J 7505 7504 7501 k 5401 5406 5405 5406 O N �y //' Arlt AU =' 'NSON _ 0+�'N t a O O 0 N l0 0 N a N HALL ® ' 539 Z N N N N N to N N N o 5387 • 5387 O N N N N N N N N N N y.N 5394 5381 1 5381 Y N N U m o y�01 d� ® ET i 5373 l - 4 N Lir6 5367 5366 N /It ,, YQ alv r©43 5359 ;� 5353 to at M 'n -8 ilir �� 5354 N N N N 5345 N N N N LAMBERT �—f O 833® 5331 5337 LAMBERT N N a I In Q N N '').4‘'. GIn a ♦ \, • • • A. ® 5323 5324 PARK W to N 17 ^1•t0IlI.1.Ut Alla 41/44# 53090 5309t N N ® 5298 5301 5302 _ 0 ® ��O _ 5295 in N N .- M n 0, M W O &)l- dl to "n n s0 a M ry a 529 5287 N N NN N N N N N N z CO RD O 0.1 i s o rn w N' 0 v N 5311 00 . ' N N Q N N 5279 a a a a a a 5301 N NN NNN N 5262 5273 5297 W p 5260 ` Q ry5o N N N N 5256 5261' 5256 5267 5287 5261 AVE 5250 5255 5250— 5260 p f�7 5255 O 0 5292 5309. 5284 ) I. N O 5244 5249 5244 5249 to n n rn M n n ti� W Q n ro '° 2 a a M N 5290 5299II ► O La 5238 5243 5238 5243 N N N N N N N I N O> �ry N � 5237 5232—J CLEARVIEW AVE 5280 5289 Off ilk , VE 0 5237 0 o m m m 0 N to 5270 5279 F1�1� 10 a 0 to 5214 523 1 5226 ��.`��, �.,,�� 0 Y 5231 N N N N N N N N 5260 5269 N7tdr®,� �� 2® N 60 N N N 522 5220 � �� M N 5225 N NN to Y M ,-..„-p., 5250 5259 N7b7E� loll. NN N f N N ti N N a N N a a N a v 0� IPIPIIP N N N N I N l N I N N 521 9 5214 5219 N N N N N N N N 5240 5249 J IMEE 5240M" 5240 • GE 0 L•,:q; E to 0 a o m 0 N o 5230 5239�M�� 5230 W N to a O N O a 0 N N o n n to O c a M N NGIG' S 88N22 2 N N N N N N N N ``n. N N 'N N 5213N N N N N N N N52205229�F7�4�-���M ' �j _M M 5206 5207 N h. N 5210 52190���5210�', ryg0 n ° to to 5200 5201 N N N N N N N N O 5200 5209 5200E12 5200 5209 5200 ry N- N N N N N N N 517 WOODALE DR 5144 515i WOODALE -DR >« 5165 5152 5155 5150 5155 5138 5149 5150 5155 5180 N 5183 N N N N N ryry� 5155 5132 5141 5144 5185 N N N N N 51425141Q 514C514;, 5126 —6 05170 5179 5133 5140 5175 fx 5745 ft 5132 5135 513C 513 0 5120 5125 5136 5165 5160 5169 5135 5-125 5128 5131 512E 5121 0 5114 5117-.1 5128 5155 5150 5159 5108 5140 5149 5118 5115 5114 511.9 ,,o n ^ ,0 5109 5120 5145 EDGEWOOD 5115 N .- o q 5130 5139 /1( 5105 5108 5107 5106 °n' 5100 N N N N 5101 5106 5135 o JR. HIGH 0 ., DR 5100 51018 SCHOOL /-3 a moo— 5090 5091 5091 5092 N L0 5091 5092 N a O 5093 5090 a 5085 5086 5085 508450833 5084 N N N 5071 7---"--080 5�5080 5081 8 5100 5079 5080 5079 00 50765075 m 5070 5071 w 5071 O 5072 5071 5074 5069 5070 5071 �1 O 5068 5067 5064 5060 5061 '5065• 5066 5065 5062 5061 5068 5061 ._.... ..,.2W -----^ 5060 `5067 5050 5051 nior y,�;.-- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Se�oa:11.:E Report�Tuer.94-1181C _ ��AFF R ORT Report Date: 5-19-94 ��`' Counci mon: C Special Order of Bashes CITY COUNCIL M ETLYG DATE May 23, 1994 o Public Hearings 0 Consent Agenda E Council Business Item Description: Consideration of Approval of Final Payment to Mikekelson—Wulff Construction Company, Contractor for City Hall Improvement Project Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summar/ (attach supplement sheets as necessarf.) - ,571 A Ry. Mikkelson-Wulff Construction Company, the contractor for the City Hall . Expansion project, has made a request for final payment. Payment of this request by the City would signify completion of this project. Jim Lindquist of Bonestroo and Associates, the architects for the project, has made a final inspection and has approved the work as being completed. The two large windows in Conference Room A and the Administrator's office are still back ordered but we have received a written contract for this work from Bonestroo and Associates. These windows are expected to arrive in 4-6 weeks. The other improvements that are currently being made to City Hall are not ,part of the contract with Mikkelson-Wulff. Completion of all City Hall improvement items is expected to be done in the next two weeks and in time for the June 6 open house. r0a4 • Tim Cruikshank, Asst. to City Admin. • RECOMMENDATION: Approve final payment to Mikkelson-Wulff Construction Company for the completion of the City Hall Expansion Project. I ff 3/18/92 MVBUILD.ORD CHAPTER 59 BUILDING PERMITS AND FEES 59 . 01. Building Permits. Before proceeding with the construction, enlargement, alteration, repair, moving, improvement, removal, conversion, or demolition of any building or structure, the owner or his agent shall first obtain a permit for such purpose from the Building Inspector. Upon the recommendation of the Clerk-Administrator, the Council shall designate all work for which permits shall be required under the provision of the Code. 59 . 02 . Permit Fees. (1) A permit fee, established from time to time by resolution of the Council, shall be paid to the Municipality prior to the issuance of any permit herein prescribed. The permit fee does not include the cost of any outside expenses the Municipality may incur related to the review, inspection, or enforcementlegal orf th permitt such as those for soil test, planning, ing consultants. The owner or agent shall make payment for all such expenses when billed therefor by the Municipality. (2) Should any person, firm or corporation begin work of any kind such as hereinafter set forth or for which a permit from the Municipality is required by the Building Code without having first secured the necessary permit from the Municipality for so doing, he shall, when subsequently securing such permit. (3) Building valuation for the purpose of establishing building permit fees shall be as adopted by the City Council by resolution and may be amended from time to time. Valuation for alterations, repairs or extensions shall be determined by the building inspector based on his estimate inof the materials cost and the labor cost to put the construction 59 . 03 . Types of Work Requiring a Permit. Subdivision 1. Permit Not Required. A building permit and permit fee shall not be required 1 thefollowing which will require oa less than $350.00 except permit regardless of the valuation of the work: (1) that any proposed work that will alter the structural framework or change the use or occupancy. of any existing building.L (2) any proposed fence as set forth in Subdivision 2, paragraph (8) belowl shall require a permit regardless of valuation. (3) land alteration impacting the surface drainage system of the City. 59 - 1 MVBUILD.ORD 3/18/92 Except for work described in Subdivision 3 below which shall require a separate permit, a separate permit shall not be required for any work that is included in the valuation declared for obtaining a permit under Subdivision 2, paragraph (1) below. Subdivision 2 . General Construction. The owner or his agent shall first obtain a permit from the building inspector before proceeding with any of the following work: (1) Construction, alteration or repair of buildings, structures, footings or foundations. (2) Excavating, grading or filling of any plot or area. (3) Construction of concrete or blacktop sidewalks, driveways or parking lots. (4) Installation of stucco. (5) Reshingling and recovering of any existing building or structure or part thereof. (6) Residing of any building or structure or part thereof. (7) Erection of any platforms or seating in any assembly or open air public assembly. (8) Erection of any fence regardless of the valuation of the work. The owner shall be responsible for assuring that the location of the fence is confined to the boundaries of his property. (252) (9) Wrecking or tearing down of any building or structure or part thereof. (10) Raising or shoring of any building or structure. (11) Moving buildings or structures from one location to another over the streets of the Municipality. (12) Moving buildings or structures larger in size than twelve (12) feet high, fourteen (14) feet wide, or twenty-five (25) feet long from one location to another over private property without moving over Municipal streets or alleys . (13) Construction, reconstruction, or repair of a permanent or temporary nature of any pipeline transporting any volatile material, including but not limited to crude or refined oil, diesel oil, fuel oil, gasoline or natural gas. A permit for the above defined work may be issued by the City Council only after a public hearing has been held after published notice has been placed in the official newspaper of the City two weeks prior to said hearing. 59 - 2 J MVBUILD.ORD 3/18192 Subdivision 3 . Electrical Work. The owner or his agent shall first obtain a permit from the electrical inspector before proceeding with any work involving installation, replacement, alteration or repair of electrical services including temporary services . For purposes of interpretation of this Chapter, the most recently published edition of the National Electrical Code shall be prima facie evidence of the definitions, interpretations, and scope of words and terms used in this Chapter. 59 . 04. Expiration of Permits . (1) All permits issued shall expire 120 days after the date of- issuance unless work set forth in the application is in actual progress . Any permit issued where work has been commenced but discontinued for 120 days shall be deemed to have lapsed. All fees paid under a lapsed permit shall be forfeited to the City. {2) The exterior of any building shall be completed prior to occupancy of that building. (3) Single- and two-family dwellings shall be completed within one year after the issuance of the building permit. Accessory buildings or alterations or additions to existing single- and two-family dwellings shall be completed within six months after the issuance of the building permit. The building inspector at the time of issuance nof a permit able deadlinefor for any othr completi ontofeof work shall such work establish a reaso (4) Any person unable, because of hardship, to complete the work for which the permit was issued within the ti me for undere 59 . 04, paragraph (3) above shall make an application n to the City Building Inspector. The decision of the building inspector may be appealed to the City Council. 59 . 05 . Stop Work Orders. Whenever any building work is being done contrary to the provisions of the Building Code, the building inspector may order the work stopped by notice in writing served on any persons engaged in doing or causing such work to be done, and any such persons shall forthwith stop such work until authorized by the building inspector to proceed with the work. 59 . 06 . Penalty. Any person violating the provisions of this Chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 59 . 07 . Development Controls . Subdivision 1. Puioose. It is the intent and purpose of this section to provide for orderly development of land to safeguard life, health, safety, property and public welfare by regulating and controlling all development within the City of Mounds View. oTher section shall be in addition to the requirements of any provisions of the Municipal Code regulating such development. 59 - 3 MVBUILD.ORD 3/18/92 Subdivision 2 . Application of Development Controls. All proposed industrial, commercial, and residential developments and expansions of existing facilities, except developments where public utilities and streets have previously been installed and the erection of no more than two detached single-family dwellings are planned, must be reviewed by the City Planning Commission and approved by the City Council, as conforming to this section. The term development as used herein shall mean all construction, public and private improvement, expansion or alteration of facilities and land within the City of Mounds View. Subdivision 3 . Development Plan. (1) The owner or developer shall submit for review a development plan which sets forth plans for utility service, surface water drainage consistent with the Local Water Management Plan dated February 12, 1990 subiect to subsequent revisions, erosion and sediment control consistent with the Ramsey County Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook (1989). prepared by the Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District and subsequent revisions thereto, streets, parking, landscaping, screening and buffering, lighting, setbacks, exterior construction design and materials, trash disposal, construction timetable, and such other matters as the Council may require. (2) The owner or developer shall submit with the development plan an abstract of title, registered property report, or such supporting affidavits or documents that establish ownership or any other parties of interest in the property involved. Subdivision 4. Development Contract. (1) A development contract which sets forth all of the terms, conditions, requirements, agreements, guarantees and plans for the orderly development of said land shall be entered into between the developer and the municipality prior to the final approval of any subdivision, rezoning, special use permits, license, or any building permits required for the construction, alteration, expansion, or improvement of said land. (2) Before execution of the development contract, the owner of developer shall submit certification from Ramsey County Department of Taxation that all taxes and special assessments due on the property have been paid in full. (3) Said development contract shall include provisions for supervision of details of construction by the City and grant to the City authority re s t psf ctory perfomanceect all work r and completion ofpursuant to sthe contract to assu work. 59 - 4 MVSWM.ORD 3/17/92 CHAPTER 25 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FUND 25 .01. DEFINITIONS. The following words and terms wherever they occur in this Chapter shall be defined as follows: (1) Area. The total area of the subject parcel of land measured in square feet and to the centerline of any abutting public streets or rights-of-way. (2) Fund. The Storm Water Management Fund. (3) Owner. Any individual, firm, association, corporation, syndicate, co-partnership, trust or other legal entity having sufficient legal or equitable interest in the subject parcel of land to commence and maintain proceeding for a building permit under Chapter 59 of the Municipal Code. (4) SWM Charge. The Storm Water Management Charge. 25 . 02 . ESTABLISHMENT. There is hereby established and created a fund, designated as "Storm Storm Water Management Fund" , and a charge, designated as the "Storm Water Management Charge" . 25.03 . PURPOSE. The purpose of the Fund is to provide for the preservation and improvement of storm water drainage facilities within the City of Mounds View. There shall be deposited in the Fund all payments received pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter and such other monies as shall be specified from time to time by the City Council. 25. 04. APPLICABILITY. Any owner or his agent, who applies for a building permit under Chapter 59 of the Municipal Code, shall pay a Storm Water Management Charge in an amount, as determined hereinafter, to the Fund. If the City Engineer determines that applicant' s land contributes storm water to a storm sewer needing improvement or additional monitoring (as identified in the storm water management study datcd July 16, 1984 Local Water Management Plan dated February 12, 1990 subject to subsequent revisions) , the applicant shall pay the SWM charge. If the City Engineer determines that the applicant' s land does not contribute storm water to a sto rm sewer needing improvement or additional monitoring, the applicant hall pay 20% of the SWM charge. 25 - 1 MVSWM.ORD 3/17/92 25 . 05. COMPUTATION OF REQUIRED SWM CHARGE. a) The minimum SWM charge shall be twenty-five dollars (25 . 00) . b) No provision herein shall be construed to prohibit the. payment of more than one SWM charge for a specific parcel of land. c) The SWM charge shall be zero whenever a building permit is issued for the addition, alteration, or improvement to an existing single family residential structure or a lot which has an existing single family residential structure in an R-1 zoned district. d) The SWM charge shall be as follows: PROPERTY ZONED SWM CHARGE R-1 $177 $202 per lot - R-2 $867 $989 per acre R-3 $1, 253 $1,429 per acre R-4, R-5, R-0, B-i $1,723 $1, 966 per acre B-2, B-3 , B-4 and I-1 Subdivision 2 . The SWM charge shall be adjusted annually on July 1st according to the change MinneapolisEngineering Paul areas Record Construction Cost Index for 25 . 06 . USE OF FUND. Any SWM Charge payments deposited in the Fund shall be used only for expenses incurred in the design, construction, preservation, or improvement of City storm water management systems. These expenses shall include, but shall not be limited to, acquisition of land, wetlands, and easements, construction of water quality control improvements, preservation of wetlands, and debt retirement in connection with storm water management system improvements . 25 . 07 . TRANSFER OF FUNDS. in the shall not Any SWM Charge payments f the Fund excepts ford the purposesd be enumerated in transferred out o Chapter 25 .06 above. 25 - 2 MVSWM.ORD 3/17/92 ORDINANCE NO. 422 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEWS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 25 ENTITLED, STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FUND The Council of the City of Mounds View hereby ordains: Section I. Chapter 25 .05, Subdivision 1, (d) is amended to read as follows: d) The SWM charge shall be as follows: Property Zoned SWM Charge R-1 0-01- $177 per lot R-2 04.44 $867 per acre R-3 $1, 200 $1,253 per acre R-4 $1, 650 $1,723 per acre R-5 $1, 650 $1,723 per acre R-0 $1, 650 $1, 723 per acre B-1 $1, 650 $1,723 per acre B-2 $1, 650 $1, 723 per acre B-3 $1, 650 $1, 723 per acre B-4 $1, 650 $1, 723 per acre I-1 $1, 650 $1,723 per acre Section II. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its publication. Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this 27 day of July, 1987 . Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 10 day of Aug. , 1987 . ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: 25 - 3 MVFPZ .ORD 3/18/92 CHAPTER 49 FLOOD PLAIN ZONING ORDINANCE 49 . 01. STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND PURPOSE. Subdivision 1. Statutory Authorization. The Legislature of the State of Minnesota has, in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 104, and in the Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 40, delegated the responsibility to local governmental units to adopt regulations designed to minimize flood losses. Therefore, the City Council of Mounds View, Minnesota, does ordain as follows: Subdivision 2 . Findings of Fact. (a) The flood hazard areas of Mounds View, Minnesota, are subject to periodic inundation which results esults in potential d tesntial loss of life, loss of property, fety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the -tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. (b) Methods Used to Analyze Flood Hazards . This Ordinance is based upon a reasonable method of analyzing flood hazards which is consistent with the standards established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Subdivision 3 . Statement of Purpose. It is the purpose general welfare this Ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and welfare and to minimize those losses described in Subdivision 2 , Section (a) , by provisions contained herein. 49 .02 . GENERAL PROVISIONS. Subdivision 1. Lands to Which Chapter Applies. This Chapter shall apply to all lands within the jurisdiction of Mounds View atoo theboundary. Flood ndar . TheseZoning lands are delineated as flood insurawithin the e 100- year flood bou Y zones A-1, A-2, A-3 , A-4, A-6, A-7 or A-H. Subdivision 2 . Establishment of Flood Plain Zoning Map. The Flood Plain Zoning Map together with all materials attached thereto is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. The attached material shall include the Flood Insurance Study for the City of Mounds View prepared by the Federal Insurance Administration dated March 3 , 1983 , and the Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps and Flood Insurance Rate tMaMaps ottherein. The Official file in ZZoning Map shall be on Administrator. Subdivision 3 . Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. The Regulatory FloodProtection abo eltheEelevation of the regional flood.n shall be an elevation no lower than o 49 - 1 MVFPZ.ORD 3/18/92 Subdivision 4 . Interpretation. (a) In their interpretation and application, the provisions of the ordinance shall be held to be minimum requirements and shall be liberally construed in favor of the governing body and shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any other powers granted by State Statutes. (b) The boundaries of the zoning districts shall be determined by scaling distances on the Flood Plain Zoning Map. Where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of the boundaries of the district as shown on the Flood Plain Zoning Map, as for example where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field condition, the Planning Commission shall make the necessary interpretation based on elevations on the regional (100-year) flood project and other available technical data. Persons contesting the location of the district boundaries shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case to the Planning Commission and to submit technical evidence. Subdivision 5. Compliance. No structure or land shall hereafter be used and no structure shall be located, extended, converted, or structurally altered without full compliance with the terms of this Chapter and other applicable regulations which apply to uses within the jurisdiction of this Chapter. Subdivision 6. Abrogation and Greater Restrictions . It is not intended by this Chapter to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions . However, where this Chapter imposes greater restrictions, the provisions of this Chapter shall prevail. In all cases, provisions of Chapter 48, Wetland Zoning Ordinance and the Local Water Management Plan date February 12, 1990sub than this to subsequent revisions, shall be considered more restr ct Subdivision 7 . Warning and Disclaimer of Liability. This Chapter does not imply that areas outside the flood plain districts or land uses permitted within such districts will be free from flooding or flood damages . This Chapter shall not create liability on the part of Mounds View or any officer or employee thereof for any flood damages that result from reliance on this Chapter or any administrative decision lawfully made thereunder. Subdivision 8 . Severability. If any section, clause, provision, or portion of this Chapter is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Chapter shall not be affected thereby. Subdivision 9 . Definitions. Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this Chapter shall be interpreted so as to give them the same meaning as they have in common usage and so as to give this Chapter its most reasonable app 49 - 2 MVFPZ.ORD 3/18/92 (a) Accessory Use or Structure - a. use or structure on the same lot with, and of a nature customarily incidental and subordinate to, the principal use or structure. (b) Equal Degree of Encroachment - a method of determining the location of floodway boundaries so that flood plain lands on both sides of a flooding source are capable of conveying a proportionate share of flood flows . (c) Flood - a temporary increase in the flow or stage of a lake or other flooding source that results in the inundation of normally dry areas. (d) Flood Frequency - the average frequency, statistically determined, for which it is expected that a specific flood stage or discharge may be equaled or exceeded. (e) Flood Plain - the areas which have been or hereafter may be covered by the regional flood. (f) Flood-Proofing - a combination of structural provisions, changes, or adjustments to properties and structures subject to flooding, primarily for the reduction or elimination of flood damages. (g) Flood Plain Zoning District - the area delineated A-1, A- 2 , A-3, A-4, A-6, A-7 or A-H on the Flood Insurance Rate Map attached to the Flood Plain Zoning Map. (h) Obstruction - any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee, dike, pile, abutment, projection, excavation, channel modification, culvert, building, wire, fence, stockpile, refuse, fill, structure, or matter in, along, across, or projecting into any channel, watercourse, or regulatory flood plain which may impede, retard, or change the direction of the flow of water, either in itself or by catching or collecting debris carried by such water. (i) Reach - a length of a watercourse or water body having relatively the same flood hazard. (j ) Regional Flood - a flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can be expected to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude of the 100-year recurrence interval. Regional flood is synonymous with the term "base flood" used in the Flood Insurance Study. (k) Structure - anything constructed or erected on the ground or attached to the ground, including, but not limited to, buildings, factories, sheds, detached garages, cabins, mobile homes, and other similar items. 49 - 3 MVFPZ.ORD 3/18M92 (1) Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation - an elevation no lower than one foot above the elevation of the regional flood except Judicial Ditch No. 1, Hillview and Lois Drive flood areas shall have an elevation no lower than 2 . 0 feet above regional flood plus any increases in flood heights attributable to encroachment on the flood plain. It is the elevation to which uses regulated by this Chapter are required to be elevated or flood-proofed. 49 .03 . ESTABLISHMENT OF FLOOD PLAIN ZONING DISTRICT. The flood plain areas within the jurisdiction of this Chapter are hereby defined to be those areas delineated A-i to A-4, A-6, A-7, and A-H or Flood Insurance Map attached to the Flood Plain Zoning Map. 49 . 04 . FLOOD PLAIN ZONING DISTRICT (F. Z.D. ) . Subdivision i. Permitted Uses. The following uses have a low flood damage potential and do not obstruct flood flows. These uses shall be permitted within the F.Z.D. to the extent that they are not prohibited by any other ordinance and provided they do not require structures, fill, or storage of materials or equipment. In addition, no use shall adversely affect the capacity of the channels or floodways or of any drainage ditch, or any other drainage facility or system. (a) Agricultural uses such as general farming, pasture, grazing, outdoor plant nurseries, horticulture, truck farming, forestry, sod farming, and wild crop harvesting. (b) Industrial-Commercial uses such as loading area or parking areas. (c) Private and public recreational uses such as golf courses, tennis courts, driving ranges, archery ranges, picnic grounds, boat lunching ramps, swimming areas, parks, wildlife and nature preserves, game farms, fish hatcheries, shooting preserves, target ranges, trap and skeet ranges, hunting and fishing areas, and single or multiple purpose recreational trails. (d) Residential uses such as lawns, gardens, parking areas, and play areas. Subdivision 2 . Conditional Uses. The following open space uses require accessory structures (temporary or permanent) , or fill or storage of materials or equipment. These uses may be permitted in the F.Z .D. only after the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit as provided in Section 49 . 07 , Subdivision 4, of this Chapter. (a) Structures accessory to open space uses . (b) Placement of fill. (c) Extraction of sand, gravel, and other materials . (d) Marinas, boat rentals, docks, piers, wharves, and water 49 - 4 MVFPZ.ORD 3/18/92 control structures. (e) Railroads, streets, bridges, utility transmission lines, and pipelines . (f) Storage yards for equipment, machinery, or materials. (g) Other uses similar in nature to uses describes in Section 49 .04, Subdivisions 1 and 2, which are consistent with the provisions set out in Section 49 . 01, Subdivision 3, and Section 49 . 04 of this ordinance. Subdivision 3. Standards for F.Z.D. Conditional Uses. (a) All uses. No structure (temporary or permanent) , fill (including fill for roads and levees) , deposit, obstruction, storage of materials, or equipment, or other uses may be allowed as a Conditional Use, which acting alone or in combination with existing or reasonably anticipated future uses, increases flood heights. In addition, all F.Z.D. conditional uses shall be subject to the standardsdthe contained follow ng in standardsSection 49 .07,(Sectiond149 .041, 4 (e) (e) Subdivision 3, b - e) . (b) Fill. (1) Any fill deposited in the F.Z.D. shall be no more than the minimum amount necessary to conduct a Conditional Use listed in Section 49 .04, Subdivision 2 . Generally, fill shall be limited to that needed to grade or landscape for that use and shall not in any way obstruct the flow of flood waters. (2) Spoil from dredging or sand and gravel operations shall not be deposited in the F.Z.D. unless it can be done in accordance with (1) of this section. (3) Fill shall be protected from erosion by vegetation cover. (c) Accessory Structures (temporary or permanent) permitted as Conditional Uses by Section 49 . 04, Subdivision 2 (a) . (1) Accessory structures shall not be designed for human habitation. (2) Accessory structures, if permitted, shall be constructed and placed on the building site so as to offer the minimum obstruction to the flow of flood waters. 49 - 5 MVFPZ.ORD 3/18/92 (3) Accessory structures shall be flood-proofed in accordance with the State Building Code. (d) Storage of Materials and Equipment. (1) The storage or processing of materials that are, in time of flooding, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life is prohibited. (2) Storage of other materials or equipment may be allowed if readily removable from the area within the time available after a flood warning. (e) Structuralrof works for flooddcocontt such as dams and channel enlargements that will change the course, current, or cross-section of a public water shall be subject to provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 105. 49 .05. Subdivisions. No land shall be subdivided which is held unsuitable by the City Council for reason of -' flooding, inadequate drainage, water supply or sewer treatment facilities. All lots within the flood plain zoning districts shall contain a building site at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. All subdivisions shall have water and sewage disposal facilities that comply with the provisions of this ordinance and have road access no both lower othe than two subdivision feetand individual building sites below the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. 49 . 06. Public Utilities, Railroads, Roads, and Bridges. Subdivision 1. Public Utilities . All public utilities and facilities such as gas, electrical, sewer, and water supply systems to be locatedin thl be e in accordance S with the State euildingCodeorelevatedto abovethe Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. Subdivision 2 . Public Transportation Facilities. Railroad tracks, roads, and bridges to be located within the F.Z .D. shall comply with Section 49 .04, Subdivision 3 (a and b) of this ordinance. Elevation to the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation shall be provided where failure or interruption of these transportation facilities are essential to the orderly functioning ng of the area. Minor or auxiliary roads or railroads may constructed at a lower elevation where failure or interruption of transportation services would not endanger the public health or safety. 49 . 07 . Administration. Subdivision 1 . Zoning Administrator. A Zoning Administrator designated by the City Council shall administer and enforce the Chapter. If he/she finds not notify violation person the responsiblensfor such of this Chapter he/she shall violation and order the action necessary to correct it. 49 - 6 MVFPZ .ORD 3/18/92 Subdivision 2 . Use Permit. (a) Use Permit Required. A use permit issued by the Zoning Administrator is conformity with the provisions of this Chapter shall be secured prior to the erection, addition, or alteration of any building, structure, or portion thereof; prior to the use or change of use of building, structure, or land; prior to the change or extension of a nonconforming use; and prior to the placement of fill or excavation of materials within the F.Z.D. (b) Application for Use Permit. Application for a use permit shall be made in duplicate to the Zoning Administrator on forms furnished by him/her and shall include the following where applicable: plans in duplicate drawn to scale, showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations of the lot; existing or proposed structures, fill, or storage of materials; and the location of the foregoing in relation to the stream channel or water body. (c) State and Federal Permits. Prior to granting a use permit or variance, or processing an application for the conditional use permit, the Zoning Administrator shall determine that the applicant has obtained all necessary State and Federal permits. (d) Certificate of Zoning Compliance for a New, Altered, or Nonconforming use. It shall be unlawful to use, occupy premises or part thereof hereafter created, erected, changed, converted, altered, or enlarged in its use or structure until a Certificate of Zoning Compliance shall have been issued by the Zoning Administrator stating that the use of the building or land conforms to the requirements of this Chapter. Where a nonconforming use or structure is extended or substantially altered, the Certificate of Zoning Compliance shall specifically state the manner in which the nonconforming structure or use differs from the provisions of this ordinance. (e) Construction and Use to be as Provided in Applications, Plans, Permits, and Certificate of Zoning Compliance. Use permits, conditional use permits, or Certificates esaoff Zoning Compliance issued on the basis of approved and applications authorize only the use, arrangement, and construction set forth in such approved plans and applications, and no other use, arrangement, or construction. Any use, arrangement, or construction at variance with that authorized shall be deemed a violation of this Chapter. The applicant shall be required to submit certification by a registered professional engineer, registered architect, or registered land surveyor that the finished fill and building elevations were accomplished in compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. Flood-proofing measures shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or registered architect. 49 - 7 MVFPZ.ORD 3/18/92 (f) Record of First Floor Elevation. The Zoning Administrator shall maintain a record of the elevation of the first floor (including basement) of all new structures or additions to existing structures in the flood plain districts. He/She shall also maintain a record of the elevations to which structures or additions tostructures are flood-proofed. Subdivision 3 . Board of Adjustment and Appeals. A Board of Adjustment and Appeals is established as provided in Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code. (a) Rules. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall adopt rules for the conduct of business and may exercise all of the powers conferred on such Boards by State law. (b) Administrative Review. The Board shall hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there is error in any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative official in the enforcement of administration of this Chapter. (c) Variances. The Board may authorize upon appeal in specific cases such variance from the terms of this chapter as will not be contrary to the public interest, where, owing to special conditions, literal enforcement of the provisions of the Chapter will result in unnecessary hardship so that the spirit of the Chapter shall be observed and substantial justice done. No Variance shall have the effect of allowing in any district uses prohibited in that district, permit a lower degree of flood protection than the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation for the particular area, or permit standards lower than those required by State law. (d) Hearings. Upon filing with the Board of Adjustment and Appeals of an appeal from a decision of the Zoning ng Administrator, or an application for a variance, Board shall fix a reasonable time for a hearing and give due notice to the parties in interest. The Board shall submit by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources a copy of the application for proposed variance sufficiently in advance so that the Commissioner will receive at least ten (10) days notice of the hearing. (e) Decisions. The Board shall arrive at a decision on such appeal or variance within thirty (30) days after Public Hearing of such appeal or variance. In passing upon an appeal the Board may, so long as such action is in conformity with the provision of the Chapter, reverse or affirm, wholly or in part, or modify the order, requirement, decision or determination appealed from. It shall make its decision in writing setting forth the findings of fact and the reasons for its decision. In granting a variance the Board may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards such as those specified in Section 49 . 07 , Subdivision 4 (g) , which are in conformity 49 - 8 3/18/92 MVFPZ,.ORD with the purposes of this Chapter. Violations of such conditions and safeguards, when made part of the terms under which the variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this Chapter punishable under Section 49 . 09 . A copy of all decisions granting variances shall be forwarded by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources within ten (10) days of such action. (f) Appeal to the City Council and District Court. Appeals from any decision of the Board may be taken by any person or persons, jointly or severally, aggrieved by any decision of the Board, or any taxpayers, officer, department, board, or bureau of the municipality, to the City Council. The decision of the City Council may be appealed to the district court, of this jurisdiction as provided in Minnesota Statutes 462 .361. Subdivision 4. Conditional Uses. The City Council shall hear and decide applications for conditional uses permissible under this Chapter. Applications shall be filed with the Clerk-Administrator who shall forward the applications to the Planning Commissioner for consideration. The Planning Commission shall in turn refer application to the City Council for decision as provided in the Municipal Code. (a) Hearings. Upon referring to the City Council as application for a conditional use permit, the City Council shall submit by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources a copy of the application for proposed conditional uses sufficiently in advance so that the Commissioner will receive at least ten (10) days notice of the hearing. (b) Decisions. The Planning Commission shall consider the request at its next regular meeting unless the filing date falls within fifteen (15) days of said meeting, in which case the request would be placed on the agenda and considered at the regular meeting following the next regular meeting. The Clerk-Administrator shall refer said application along with all related information to the City Planning Commission at least ten (10) days prior to the regular meeting. The City Council shall then arrive at a decision on a conditional use within sixty (60) days after the first regular Planning Commission meeting at which the request was considered. In granting a conditional use permit the City Council may prescribe appropriated conditions and safeguards, in addition to those specified in Section 49 . 07 , Subdivision 4 (g) , which are in conformity with the purposes of this Chapter. • Violations of such conditions and safeguards, when made part of the terms under which the conditional use permit is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this Chapter punishable under Section 49 . 09 . A copy of all decisions granting conditional use permits shall be forwarded by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources within ten (10) days of such action. 49 - 9 MVFPZ .ORD 3/18/92 (c) Procedures for Evaluating Proposed Conditional Uses within the General Flood Plain Districts: (1) Upon receipt of an application for a conditional use permit for a use within the F.Z.D. , the applicant shall be required to furnish such of the following information as is deemed necessary by the Planning Commission for the determination of the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. (a) Plan (surface view) showing elevations or contours of the ground; pertinent structure, fill, or storage elevations; size, location, and spatial arrangement of all proposed and existing structures on the site; location and elevations of streets; photographs showing existing land uses and vegetation upstream and downstream; and soil type. (2) One copy of the above information shall be transmitted to a designated engineer or other expert person or agency for technical assistance in determining the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. Procedures consistent with Minnesota Regulations NR 86-87 shall be followed in this expert evalshalluation. The calculate the water surface profild enginer or e le of the regional flood. (3) Based upon the technical evaluation of the designated engineer or expert, the Planning Commission shall determine the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation at the site. (d) Procedures to be followed byothe n cPlaiting Commissionranl d City Council in passing applications: (1) Require the applicant to furnish such of the following information and additional information as deemed necessary by the Planning Commission and City Council for determining the suitability of the particular site for the proposed use: (a) Plans in triplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevation of the lot, existing or proposed fill, storage or materials, flood-proofing measures, and the relationship of the above to the location of the stream channel. (b) • Specifications for building constructionand nd materials, flood-proofing, filling, of materials, water supply and sanitary facilities . 49 - 10 MVFPZ.ORD 3/18/92 (2) Transmit one copy of the information described in subsection (1) to a designated engineer or other expert person or agency for technical assistance, where necessary, in evaluating the proposed project in relation to flood heights and velocities, the seriousness of flood damage to the use, the adequacy of the plans for protection, and other technical matters . (3) Based upon the technical evaluation of the designated engineer or expert, the Planning Commission shall determine the specific flood hazard at the site and evaluate the suitability of the proposed use in relation to the flood hazard. (e) Factors Upon Which the Decision of the City Council Shall be Based. In passing upon conditional use applications, the City Council shall consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this Chapter, and (1) The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments. swept o (2) The sanger that materials beorr downstream to the i may of othersother . land (3) The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamination, and unsanitary conditions. roposed its (4) The contents eptobflood damage ility of the pa d the feffect yand of such damage on the individual owner. (5) The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community. (6) The requirements of the facility for a waterfront location. (7) The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use. (8) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future. ip (9) The comprehensiveofplanand theproposed use pplain management program for the area. (10) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles . 49 - 11 MVFPZ.ORD 3/18/92 (11) The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site. (12) Such other factors which are relevant to the purposes of this chapter. (f) Time for Acting on Application. The City Council shall act on an application in the manner described above within the time limits given above, except where additional information is required pursuant to Section 49 .07, Subdivision 4 (c and d) of this ordinance. The City Council shall render a written decision within fifteen (15) days from the receipt of such additional information beyond the time limits given above. (g) Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permit. Upon consideration of the factors listed above and the purpose of this Chapter, the City Council may attach such conditions to the granting of conditional use permits as it deems necessary to fulfill the purposes of this Chapter. Such conditions may include, but" are not limited to, the following: (1) Modification of waste disposal and water supply facilities. (2) Limitations on period of use, occupancy, and operation. (3) Imposition of operational controls, sureties, and deed restrictions. (4) Requirements of construction of channel modifications, dikes, levees, and other protective measures. (5) StatespCode.measures,ofing accordance the States BuildingThe applicant shall submit plan or document certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the flood- proofing measures are consistent with the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area. 49 . 08 . Nonconforming Uses. Subdivision 1. A structure or the use of a structure or premises which was lawful before the passage or amendment of this Chapter but which is not in conformity with the provisions of the Chapter may be continued subject to the following conditions: (a) No such use shall be expanded, changed, enlarged, or altered in a way which increases its nonconformity. 49 - 12 MVFPZ.ORD 3/18/92 (b) No structural alteration or addition to any nonconforming structure over the life of the structure shall exceed fifty (50) percent of its assessed value at the time of its becoming a nonconforming use, unless the entire structure is permanently changed to a nonconforming use or unless the alteration or addition would substantially reduce potential flood damages for the entire structure. (c) Any alteration or addition to a nonconforming use which would result in substantially increasing the flood damage potential of that use shall be flood-proofed in accordance with the State Building Code. (d) If any nonconforming use is discontinued for twelve (12) consecutive months, any future use of the building premises shall conform to this Chapter. The assessor shall notify the Zoning Administrator in writing of instances of nonconforming uses which have been discontinued for a period of twelve (12) months. (e) If any nonconforming use is destroyed by any means, including floods, to an extent of fifty (50) percent or more of its assessed value, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this Chapter. (f) Uses or adjuncts thereof which are or become nuisances shall not be entitled to continue as nonconforming uses . (g) Nonconforming uses located in the F.Z.D. shall be eliminated or brought into conformity with the standards contained in this Chapter within a reasonable period of time as determined by the City Council, after a hearing for each such nonconforming use. The City Council shall make its determination upon the basis of the normal life of any improvement upon the premises . In additions, the monetary value of any competitive advantage derived by the operation of such nonconforming use, by reason of the limitation of establishment of competing businesses as a result of this Chapter, shall be considered as a reduction of losses resulting from the requirement of termination of the use under this Chapter. (h) The Zoning Administrator shall prepare a list of those nonconforming uses which have been flood-proofed or otherwise adequately protected in conformity with Section 49 . 07, Subdivision 4 (g) of this ordinance. He/She shall present such list to the City Council which may issue a certificate to the owner stating that such uses as a. result of these corrective measures, are in conformity with the provisions of this Chapter. 49 . 09 . Penalties for Violation. Violation of the provisions of this Chapter or failure to comply with any of its requirements (including violations of in variances orn conditional safeguards uses)established halledconst constitute a1on with mi demeanor. Arany variances 49 - 13 MVFPZ.ORD 3/18/92 person who violates this Chapter or fails to comply with any o its requirements shall upon conviction thereof be fined no more than $500 or imprisoned for not more than ninety (90) days, or both, and in addition shall pay all costs and expenses involved in the case. Each day such violation continues shall be considered a separate offense. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the City Council from taking such other lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any violation. 49 . 10. Amendments. The flood plain designation on the Flood Plain Zoning Map shall not be removed from flood plain areas unless it can be shown that the designation is in error or that the area has been filled to or above the elevation of the regional flood and is contiguous to lands outside the flood plain. Special exceptions to this rule may be permitted by the Commissioner of Natural Resources if he determines that, through other measures, lands are adequately protected for the intended use. All amendments to this Chapter including amendments to the Flood Plain Zoning Map must be submitted to and approved by the Commissioner of Natural Resources prior to adoption. Changes by stinn the Flood Plain Zoning Map also require prior approval Federal Insurance Administration. 49 - 14 MV SWDM.ORD 3/18/92 CHAPTER 49A SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTROL ORDINANCE 49A. 01 Findings of Fact and Purpose. Subdivision 1. Findings of Fact. (a) The public interest necessitates sound land use development as land is a limited and irreplaceable resource and the land within the municipality is a resource to be developed in a manner which will result in minimum damage to the quality of life and to property and threat to health and reductions of private and public economic loss caused by drainage problems. (b) The existing drainage system in Mounds However,Vietthe general in sera adequately meets the needs of the City. m drainage system will not in the future provide adequate or_proper drainage in those areas of the City subject to substantial residential, commercial or industrial development unless--the large increase in storm water runoff that is known to result from such development is properly controlled and regulated. The consequence of not restricting such increase in runoff would be to subject a major portion of the lands of the City to high water tables, drainage problems, storm water flooding by heavy rains, inadequate drainage facilities, causing erosion, damage to property, disruption of residential, commercial and governmental services, unsanitary conditions and interruptions of transportation, all of which would be detrimental to the health, safety, welfare and property of affected residents of the City. (c) The Local Water Management Plan was prepared for the City in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 103B. 201 TO 103B.255 . The plan identifies the goals and policies of the City in providing for future development while minimizing surface water problems. The goals, policies, and development guidelines in the Local Water Management Plan are hereby incorporated by reference into this Chapter. Subdivision 2 . Purposes. (a) a - ' - - - - -- - . -a ; - -- = - =-•and minimize storm water runoff through land development management ent measures stressing storm watcr rete- - - efforts of the City' s Water Management programs are to prevent flooding and improve water quality through the best possible utilization of wetlands and artificial detention areas. Wetland management, as opposed to preservation, will allow the City to maintain the integrity of its wetlands while improving water quality and reducing the City maintenance efforts. (b) To guide and control new development of lands within the City in ways that will be consistent with the zoning laws and Comprehensive Development Plan in force at the time of the development, consistent with the requirements of the Local Water 49A - 1 MVSWDM.ORD 3/18/92 Management Plan, Rice Creek Watershed District, Muni pal Cde, Minnesota State Statutes, and other regulatory agencies nd consistent with sound economic policies as such policies affect property owners and the proponents of new developments; and to require proponents of new developments to adopt sound development plans and proposals that will cause no economic burden both as to storm waters or drainage, on the owners of abutting or adjoining properties, or affected properties, or on the property owners of the City at large. 49A.02 General Provisions . Subdivision 1. Applicability. The requirements adopted herein shall apply to all development proposals that are subject to the provisions of Chapter 59 .07 of the Municipal Code. Subdivision 2 . Required Facilities . The City may, at its sole discretion, require conveyance systems, retention and/or detention areas and associated water duality improvement structures required for any development proposal to meet the goals, policies and development guidelines of the Local Water Management Plan dated February 12, 1990 subject to subsequent revisions. Subdivision 3 . Performance Guarantee. Whenever privately owned and maintained drainage improvements shall be required for a development by the City, the developer shall provide a seven year maintenance/performance guarantee to assure proper maintenance and operation of such improvements. In such cases, the developer shall also hold the City harmless for any defect in design, construction or operation. Subdivision 4. Financial Responsibility. Drainage facility improvements required for any development proposal shall be the financial responsibility of the developer. 49A. 03 Design Standards. Subdivision 1. Storm sewer system water requiredfacilities for any development shall be designed and constructedto atleast a five year frequency storm design, retention basins shall be constructed to retain at least a hundred year storm while allowing at a maximum, the amount of runoff from the property that will according to the Development Guidelines of the Local Water Management Plan dated February 12 , 1990 subject to subsequent revisions . Subdivision 2 . The Ramsey County Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook (1989) prepared by the Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District and subsequent revisions thereto shall be utilized in the design and construction of sediment and erosion control measures within the City. 49A. 04 Definitions . Subdivision 1. Five, Fifty and One Hundred Year Storm. It 49A - 2 MVSWDM.ORD 3/18/92 _ _ __ _ - - - - _ - . - - " - y ars. drainage basin with no outl-ct to-downstream arca3. from the adjoining drainage basin. Definitions related to this Chapter are contained in Volume 3 , Appendix C of the Local Water Management Plan. 49A. 05 Responsibility. Neither the issuance of a permit nor compliance with the conditions thereof, nor the provisions of the Chapter, shall relieve any person from any responsibility otherwise imposed_by law for damages to persons or property; nor shall the issuance of any permit hereunder serve to impose any liability on the municipality or its officers or employees for injury or damage to person or property. A permit issued pursuant to this Chapter shall not relieve the permittee of the responsibility of complying with any other requirements established by law, regulation or ordinance. 49A. 06 Penalty. Any person who violates the provision of this Chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Each day during which said violation exists is a separate offense. Any violation of this Chapter is a public nuisance and may be enjoined by civil action. Costs of any civil enforcement shall be assessed against the party so enjoined. Any person who, in violation of this Chapter, alters, changes, or modifies any surface water drainage facilities shall restore such facilities to their original condition within the time limit set by the Council. 49A. 07 Severability- If any part of the Chapter is held to be unconstitutional or otherwise illegal, the remainder of this Chapter shall be deemed and held to be valid and remain in force and effect as if such portion had not been included herein. If this Chapter o f any n, provision herein is held to be applicable to any person, property, or work, such holding shall not effect the applicability hereof to any other person' s property or work. 49A. 08 Variance and Appeals . Subdivision 1. Processing of Application. Any application for variances or appeals shall be processed according to the procedures specified in Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code. Subdivision 2 . Restrictions on Granting Variances . No variance may be granted which would allow any use that is 49A - 3 MVSWDM.ORD 3/18/92 prohibited in the zoning district in which the property is located or which would: (a) Result in incompatible land uses or which would be detrimental to the protection of surface and ground water supplies. (b) Increase the financial burdens imposed on the community through increasing floods and overflow of water onto land areas within this City or onto land areas adjacent to Rice Creek. (c) Be not in keeping with land use plans and planning objectives for the City or which would increase or cause danger to life or property. (d) Be inconsistent with the goals, policies and Development Guidelines 12,°f 1990eLocal Water Management Plan s bject to subsequent revisions.dated February Subdivision 4. Required Supporting Data. No pei hor r variance shall be issued unless the applicant, in support oapplication, shall submit engineering data, surveys, site plans and other information as the City may require in order to determine the effects of such development on the affected land and water area. 49A - 4 48.01 CHAPTER 48 WETLAND ZONING ORDINANCE 48.01. TITLE, COUNCIL FINDINGS, POLICY, PURPOSES, AND MEANS. Subdivision 1. Citation. Section 48.01 to 48.15 may be cited as the Wetlands Ordinance. Subdivision 2. Findings and Purposes. The Council finds that wetlands within the City, as part of the ecosystem, are critical to the present and future health, safety, and general welfare of the land, animals, and people within the City, as well as within the Rice Creek Watershed District; that existing and potential development within the City and Rice Creek Watershed possess increasing ecological and economic problems and demands, having the effect of potentially despoiling, polluting, accelerating the aging, eliminating or negatively and irretrievably altering both the wetlands and their functions (and the processes associated therewith) which, if managed will constitute important physical, educational, ecological, aesthetic, recreational, and economic assets for existing and future residents of the community and the Rice Creek Watershed District. The City Council has in mind its statutory obligation to comply with Chapters 104, 105, and 112 of Minnesota State Law, the regulations of Rice Creek Watershed District, Regulations of the Department of Natural Resources, including provisions for protected waters, Public Law 92-500 (Federal Water Pollution Control Act) , open space policies of the Metropolitan Council and its guidelines encouraging protection and enhancement of marshes, wetlands in the flood plain area, and the public interest in preventing irreparable destruction or deterioration of valuable natural resources. Therefore, recognizing the obligation to protect these assets and natural resource gifts from destruction or deterioration and pollution of all kinds, the purposes of this Chapter are: A. To preserve wetlands in as natural a state as possible; to serve as natural retention and detention areas for surface waters; to regulate the use of areas adjacent to the wetlands in order to protect and enhance the natural function of the wetlands; to provide for the protection, preservation, proper maintenance, use and enhancement of wetland zoning districts; to minimize the disturbance to them and to prevent or minimize damage from excessive 48.01 sedimentation, eutrophication, or pollution; to prevent loss of aquatic organisms, wildlife, and vegetation or the habitats of the 1 same; to provide for the protection of surface and ground water supplies from the danger of drought, overdraft, pollution, or mismanagement; to secure safety from floods; to reduce the financial burdens imposed upon the community through rescue and relief efforts occasioned by the occupancy or use of areas subject to periodic flooding; to prevent loss of life, property damage, and the losses and risks associated with flood conditions; to reduce erosion problems; to enhance and preserve quality; and to enhance and preserve the natural drainage ways. B. The public interest necessitates sound land use development, as land is a limited and irreplaceable resource, and the land within the municipality is a resource to be developed in a manner which will result in minimum damage to the quality of life, property, threat to health and reduction of private/public economic loss caused by drainage problems. Subdivision 3. Means. It is the intent of the City to effectuate the purposes of this ordinance through the following means: A. Adopt a map designating the wetlands protected by this Ordinance. B. Promote community education about the importance, function, limitations, and impact of urbanization upon the water resources of the community. C. To preserve and enhance of wetlands within the community through implementation of development regulations that will ensure the design and construction of adequate on-site storm water, sedimentation and retention and detention basins, flow control devices, and implementation of effective erosion control techniques. D. To apply techniques such as density transfers to development proposals in order to minimize ratios of impermeable surface to open space. 48.03 E. To establish means by which certain wetlands may be placed in the public domain for purposes of enhancement, preservation, protection, and maintenance. F. To provide means by which an applicant and the City will routinely obtain advice and input from various governmental agencies and 2 professionals in the field of fresh water biology, hydrology, and civil engineering. G. To establish a system of permits and enforcement to effectuate the intent of this ordinance. 48.02. WETLAND ZONING DISTRICTS. This Chapter shall apply to wetland zoning districts which are specifically identified on the zoning map entitled, "Wetland Zoning District Map", an official copy of which shall be on file in the office of the Clerk-Administrator and shall be available for inspection and copying upon the terms and conditions as established by the City. A wetland zoning district may be modified or eliminated by four- fifths affirmative vote of the Council after Public Hearing and notice as set forth in Chapter 40 of this Code. Wetland zoning districts may not be eliminated unless it can be shown that the original designation is in error or that conditions have changed. When modifying or removing a wetland zoning district, the Council shall use the criteria and methods established in the FEDERAL MANUAL FOR IDENTIFYING AND DELINEATING JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS -dated January, 1989, as amended from time-to-time. 48.03. SCOPE. The wetland zoning district shall overlay the zoning districts established pursuant to Chapter 40 of this Code as amended, so that any parcel of land lying in a wetland zoning district shall also lie in one or more of the established zoning districts. Lands lying within a wetland zoning district shall be subject to the requirements established by other applicable ordinances and regulations of the City. Within each wetland zoning district, all uses shall be permitted in accordance with the regulations for the underlying zoning district, provided, however, that such uses must also satisfy the additional requirements established in this Chapter. 3 48.04 48.04. DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 1. Alteration. Any change, addition or modification. Subdivision 2. Building. Any structure used or intended for supporting or sheltering any use or occupancy. Subdivision 3. Development. The construction, installation or alteration of any structure; the extraction, clearing or other alteration of land or terrestrial or aquatic vegetation; or the course, current or cross ---section of any water body or watercourse; or the subdivision of land into parcels pursuant to Chapter 42 of the Municipal Code. Subdivision 4. Dimensional Requirements. A- minimum/maximum setback yard requirements, or structure height or size established in Chapter 40 and 42 of the Municipal Code. Subdivision 5. Drainage Way A. Any natural, altered or artificial watercourse which has definable beds and banks capable of conducting confined runoff from adjacent lands. Watercourse beds not clearly defined shall be delineated to include that area which would be inundated by runoff, calculated in accordance with provisions in the Local Water Management Plan, rc3ulting from a 24 hour rainfall a storm event having a recurrence interval of once in ten years. B. An altered watercourse is that which has been affected by man-made changes in straightening, deepening, narrowing, or widening the original channel. C. An artificial watercourse is that which has been artificially constructed by man where there was no previous natural watercourse. The limits of the watercourse bed are confined to that area which would be inundated by runoff, calculated in accordance with provisions in the Local Water Management Plan, rc3ulting from a 24 hour rainfall a storm event having a recurrence interval of once in ten years. 48.04 Subdivision 6. Enhance/ Enhancement. To heighten the value of Mounds View wetlands with respect to the purposes of this chapter. 4 Subdivision 6A. Local Water Management Plan. A Local Water Management Plan, dated February 12, 1990, has been prepared for the City in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 1038.201 to 103B. 255. The plan identifies the goals and policies of the City in providing for future development while minimizing surface water problems. Subdivision 7. Managed. To control the use of Mounds View's wetland resources in a manner which is consistent with the purposes of this chapter. Management of wetlands includes conservation maintenance, and enhancement. Subdivision 8. Permit. An official document or certificate issued by the City authorizing performance of a specified activity. Subdivision 9. Person. Any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, association or other private or governmental entity. Subdivision 10. Structure. That which is built or constructed, an edifice or building of any kind, or any piece of work artificially built up - or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner. Subdivision 11. Water Quality. The degree of excellence of water including but not limited to phosphorus concentrations, sediment load, and concentration of metals. Subdivision 12. Wetland. Those areas greater than one acre in size, that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology, as delineated on the Wetland Zoning District Map. Subdivision 13. Wetland Buffer Area. Areas abutting and within 100 feet, measured horizontally, of a wetland. 48.05 Subdivision 14. Wetland Drainage District.renDistriy to ct Map the Wetland Zoning District as delineated on the Wetland Zoning Subdivision 15. Wetland Zoning District. The areas delineated on the Wetland Zoning District Map which includes the wetlands and wetland buffer areas. 48.05. WETLAND ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS. Subdivision 1. No development, shall be allowed within a wetland zoning district without first having obtained a wetland alteration permit from the City as provided for in Chapter 48.06 of this Code. 5 Subdivision 2. Whenever a wetland or drainageway is located on lands that are being subdivided, the subdivider shall dedicate such wetland and/or drainageway to the public as allowed per Minnesota Statutes 462 and shall dedicate an easement to the public as required for purposes of improving, maintaining, or protecting the area for drainage, water quality enhancement or other purposes expressed in this Chapter. Subdivision 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Chapter 40 of this Code, the following shall apply to all lands proposed to be subdivided pursuant to Chapter 42 of this Code and lying within a wetland zoning district: --- - - A. Rationale for Density Standards -- The following regulations are required to control the density of development in wetland zoning districts. The purpose of controlling development density is to reduce the financial burdens imposed on the community through rescue and relief efforts occasioned by the occupancy or use of areas subject to periodic flooding; to minimize loss of life, property damage, and the losses and risks associated with flood conditions; and to minimize the detrimental effects of urbanization on the wildlife habitat, water quality enhancement, recreational and aesthetic values of wetlands. 1. Minimum lot size - 20,000 square feet. 2. Minimum lot width -125 feet as measured at the building setback line. 48.06 3. All buildings, other than accessory buildings, as defined in Chapter 40 of this Code, shall be setback at least 100 feet from the wetland. 4. All accessory buildings shall be setback not less than the setback requirements set forth in Chapter 40.05 Subdivision C of this Code. Subdivision 6. Any building or structure situated on an existing parcel Of record, as of the date of the original date of Enactment of this ordinance, that does not meet the requirements of this chapter shall be considered non-conforming pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 40.03 of this Code and will require a variance from the Council to build or rebuild. A non- conforming parcel shall exist: A. Where any portion of the parcel is contained "in a Wetland" ; or 6 B. Where 20 percent of a parcel or at least 2,000 square feet of the parcel, whichever is less, shall be contained within the Wetland Buffer Area A non-conforming building shall exist: A. Where it does not meet building or structure setback requirements; B. Where it does not meet floor elevation requirements; 48.06. PERMITS. Subdivision 1. The following activities in or upon a wetland zoning district shall require a wetland alteration permit: A. The digging, dredging, filling, draining, or in anyway altering or removing any material from a wetland. _ B. The alteration of vegetation within the wetland or the destruction of vegetation within the Wetland Zoning District except to abate a public nuisance. C. The construction, alteration, or removal of any structure. 48.06 D. The altering of any embankment or ponding area, or the changing of the flow of water or ponding capacity. E. The storing of materials which would interfere with the flow of water and/or ponding capacity. F. Disposing of waste materials including, but not limited to, demolition debris and yard waste. G. Installation or maintenance of essential services. Subdivision 2. In consideration of an application for the issuance of a wetland alteration permit, the City may require that the applicant furnish and supply such information as required in 48.06 (4B) . In acting upon a wetland alteration permit application, the City shall consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this Chapter, including: A. The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan and the impact of the proposed use on the wetlands in the surrounding area. 7 B. The impact of the proposed wetland alteration on the surface water storage, fish and 'wildlife habitat, and water quality enhancement values of the wetland. Subdivision 3. Permits Standards: No permit shall be issued unless the City finds and determines that the proposed development complies with the following standards, or unless a variance is granted by the Council as set forth in Chapter 48.14 of this Code. A. Alteration. A minimum alteration of a wetland may be allowed when necessary for the use of property but only when it will not have a substantially or significantly adverse effect as determined by the City, upon the ecological and hydrological characteristics of the wetland; however, in no case shall the restrictions set out below be exceeded. Since the extent of alteration which can be permitted is limited, the City when considering a permit application, shall consider equal apportionment of alteration opportunity. The alteration opportunity within the wetland shall be allocated among property owners in proportion to the area of wetland located within each property. 48.06 1. Any alteration shall not cause a reduction in the flood storage capacity of the wetland. Flood storage capacity shall be determined by analysis of the runoff from the entire developed wetland drainage district resulting from both the two-year and 100-year frequency, 24-hour SCS Type 1 distribution storms. 2. An alteration shall not reduce the existing water quality enhancement value of a wetland under conditions of ultimate development, during both the 2-year and 100-year frequency, 24-hour SCS Type 1 distribution storms. Water quality enhancement value of a wetland shall be determined using methods approved by the City. 3. Any alteration shall not reduce the existing wildlife habitat value of a wetland as measured using methods approved by the City. 4. Only fill substantially free of chemical pollutants and wastes, as determined by the City, may be used. 5. Alterations shall be carried out so as to minimize the impact on vegetation. 8 6. Alterations shall not adversely the water flow characteristics within the wetland as determined by the City. 7. The size of the altered area shall be limited to the minimum required for the proposed action. 8. Work in the wetland will not be performed during the breeding season of waterfowl or fish spawning season. 9. No part of any sewage disposal system requiring on-land or in- ground disposal of waste shall be located closer than 100 feet from the wetland. All on-land or in-ground sewage disposal systems shall meet criteria set out in Minnesota Rule 6, MCAR 4.8040, "Individual Sewage Treatment System Standard. " 48.06 10. Waste which would normally be disposed of at a solid or hazardous waste disposal site or which would normally be discharged into a sewage disposal system or sewer shall not be directly or indirectly discharged to a wetland. 11. Construction Erosion control measures and retention facilities shall be designed to limit soil loss from the development site to not more than five (5) tons per acre per year. Plans and supporting documentation for such measures and facilities shall be developed and approved by the City prior to commencement of construction. 12. The applicant for the wetland alteration permit shall be required to demonstrate that after the development is completed, the conditions on the site will be stabilized such that the yearly soil loss from the site will not be greater than 0.5 tons per acre per year. 13. Sediment and soil loss shall be determined utilizing the "Universal Soil Loss Equation" as defined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service Technical Field Guide as amended from time to time as provided for Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District. 14. Stormwater runoff from a development may be directed to the wetland when in conformance with the Local surface Water mManagement plan and only when substantially, as determined by the Council, free of sediment, debris, and chemical pollutants, and only at rates which will not substantially, 9 disturb vegetation or increase turbidity as determined by the City. 15. The proposed action shall not cause stormwater runoff from the development to take place at a rate which would exceed the rate or volume of runoff as anticipated by the City's Local surface Water Management Plan . 10 48.06 16. The quality of water infiltrated to the water table or aquifer shall remain substantially, as determined by the City, unchanged by the alteration of the site. 17. All buildings, other than accessory buildings, as defined in Chapter 40 of this Code, shall be setback at least 100 feet from the wetland. 18. All accessory buildings as defined in Chapter 40 of this Code shall be setback not less than the requirements set forth in Chapter 40.05 subdivision C. 19. The lowcat floor c' e minimum buildings elevation permitted in a wetland zoning district shall be as defined in the Local Water Management Plan - the elevation of the 0100 year frequency flood level'. - 20. No alteration shall be allowed which will endanger the health, safety, or welfare of persons, or which may result in unusual road maintenance costs or utility line breakages due to soil limitations, including high frost action. 21. Removal of vegetation within a wetland zoning district shall be permitted only when reasonably required for the placement of structures and use of property. Subdivision 4. Conditions A. 1. A wetland alteration permit may be approved subject to conditions reasonable and necessary to ensure compliance with the requirements contained in 48.06, Subdivisions 1, 2, and 3. Such conditions may, among other matters a. Provide for the enhancement of wetland storm water storage, fish and wildlife habitat, and water quality enhancement functions of wetland zoning districts; 48.06 b. provide for enhancement of recreation and education opportunities in wetland zoning districts; c. limit the size, kind, or character of the proposed work; 11 d. require the construction of stormwater detention facilities or other structures; e. require replacement of vegetation; f. establish required monitoring or maintenance procedures including the payment of costs for such procedures; g. stage the work over time and increments of land to be developed; h. require the alteration of the site design to insure buffering; • i. require the provision a performance bond; j . or require the conveyance to the City of certain lands or interest therein. The dimensional requirements of the underlying zoning ordinance may be modified in furtherance of the purposes of this Chapter. 2. The permit application shall be submitted to the City. The City shall process the permit application according to the provisions of 48.06 Subdivision 6 of this Code. The Council who may referthe permit application to the Planning Commission or the City staff for review and report or may direct that the permit application be processed according to the procedures specified for the processing of conditional use permits set forth in Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code. Upon approval of the application for the permit, the City Council may establish such terms and conditions, in addition to those specifically cited in this Chapter or Chapter 40 as it deems necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, 48.06 including the posting of sufficient surety to guarantee conformance to the purposes of the permit and all laws regulating the activity. The development controls provided in Chapter 59.07 of the Municipal Code may also be required. 3 . A wetland alteration permit may be processed coextensively with any other application for use permit approval that may be required under other provisions of the Municipal Code. 12 B. The following drawings and exhibits may be required with a permit application: 1. The name and address of the subdivider, developer, and owner or any other party of interest. 2. A legal description of the proposed site with a map showing its location with indications of private access roads, existing or proposed public roadways within and surrounding the development site. 3. A full and adequate description of all phases of the operation and/or proposed physical changes. 4. A soil survey map of the proposed development site. 5. A topographic map of the development area with contour information at two (2) foot intervals or spot elevations at two hundred (200) foot intervals and at a horizontal -scale of one (1) inch to one hundred (100) feet or larger. 6. A detailed site plan of the proposal showing proposed drainage, grading, and landscaping. 7. A site design map showing the location of existing and future man-made features within the site and to a distance of five hundred (500) feet surrounding the site or to the wetland drainage district boundary, whichever is shorter. 13 48.06 8. Information on existing drainage and vegetation of all lands within the site and to a distance of five hundred (500) feet surrounding the site or to the wetland drainage district boundary, whichever is shorter. 9. The time period for commencement and completion of the development, including time for staging of development, if applicable. 10. Design specification and plan for all sediment and erosion control measures as well as all grading and drainage appurtenances and practices. 11. Engineering data related to computations of existing and proposed hydrology, water quality, hydraulics, and soil loss. 12. Such additional information as necessary to evaluate the permit application. Subdivision 5. Time of Permit - Extensions and Renewals. A permittee shall begin the work authorized by the permit within ninety (90) days from the date of issuance of the permit unless otherwise set forth in the permit. The permittee shall complete the work authorized by the permit within the time limit specified on the permit, which shall in no event exceed more than twelve (12) months from the date of issuance unless such time limit is extended by the Council. The permittee shall notify the City at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the commencement of work. Should the work not be commenced as specified herein, the permit shall become void. Subdivision 6. Issuing Authority A. The Issuing Authority for Wetland Alteration Permits shall be as set forth here after: 1. Administrative Issuing Authority: The City Engineer/Director of Public Works, or his designee (Building Inspector or City Planner) have the authority to issue wetland alteration permits which meet the standards in this chapter if: 48.07 a. The permit requests repair or maintenance of any lawful use of land existing on the date of adoption of this Chapter. 14 b. Alterations within the wetland buffer zone do not extend into or impact the adjacent wetland. c. The permit requests public and/or private utility work on existing facilities. and for the following work within the wetland buffer zone, but outside of the wetland not having adverse impacts upon the wetlands. a. Installation and maintenance of fences. b. Landscaping not including impervious surfaces c. Detached garages and accessory buildings. d. Grading which does not adversely alter storm water storage capacity, storm water flow direction or runoff intensity. e. Temporary structures not requiring permanent foundations or pads for support. II. The City Council may issue permits which meet the standards in this Chapter and are beyond the scope of the administrative approval above; which have been reviewed by City staff and referred to Council; or which are appealed to Council after having been reviewed and denied by City staff. 48.07. EXCEPTIONS; PERMIT. A. Emergencies. Upon the declaration of an emergency by the City, emergency work necessary to preserve life or property shall be permitted in a wetland zoning district. B. Repairs. Upon application and approval by the Council City, a person may repair or maintain any lawful use of land existing on the date of adoption of this Chapter. 48.08 B. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code to the contrary, may develop a municipally owned recreation or park facility on City owned lands which will involve the development within a wetlands zoning district as part of an integrated plan, comprising not less than 75 acres, where such development would reasonably conserve, preserve and enhance 15 the environment by providing facilities that would protect the public health, safety and welfare. 48.08. DEVELOPMENT DENSITY AND PARK LAND DEDICATION CREDIT TRANSFERS. Subdivision 1. When land to be developed includes wetlands, the developer thereof may receive a credit for the undevelopable portion of said wetland, either: A. toward the dedication of land requirements under Municipal Code, Chapter 42.13, Parks and Playground Dedication, not exceeding the amount of the developable lands in the development proposal; or B. the development may be intensified so as not to exceed twice the allowable land use densities prescribed under Chapters 40 and 42 of the Code provided, however, that said intensified land use must be consistent with street dedication dimensions, parking requirements, and screening, fencing and landscaping regulations of the Cit ; or C. the building square footage requirements of the Municipal Code may be intensified but not to exceed five (5) percent; or D. any combination of A, B, and C above as agreed upon by developer and City, keeping in mind that the public health, safety, and welfare of the community is paramount. Subdivision 2. Upon receipt of any of the credits herein, the developer shall convey any wetlands designated by this Chapter, for which a credit has been given, to and may be accepted by the City free and clear of all encumbrances. 48.12 48.09. ACQUISITION OF INTERESTS IN LAND. The municipality may acquire, pursuant to law, fee title or easement rights, by dedication, gift, purchase, eminent domain, tax forfeiture, leasehold estates, part or all of any wetlands or land adjacent, abutting, contiguous, or affecting wetlands, for the purpose of preserving such lands and protecting the public health, safety, and welfare. Charges authorized by Chapter 25 and Chapter 42 of the Municipal Code or by other applicable law may be used to finance the acquisitions authorized herein. The Council may abate those taxes and assessments within wetlands as authorized by law. 48.10. RESPONSIBILITY. Neither the issuance of a permit nor compliance with the conditions thereof, nor with the provisions of this Chapter, shall relieve any person from any responsibility otherwise imposed by law for 16 damages to persons or properties; nor shall the issuance of any permit hereunder serve to impose any liability on the municipality or its officers or employees for injury or damage to persons or property. A permit issued pursuant to this Chapter shall not relieve the permittee of the responsibility of complying with any other requirements established by law, regulation or ordinance. 48.11. PENALTY. Any person who violates the provisions of this Chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Each day during which said violation exists is a separate offense. Any violation of this Chapter is a public nuisance and may be enjoined by civil action. Costs of any civil enforcement shall be assessed against the property so enjoined. Any person who, in violation of this Chapter, alters, changes or modifies any wetlands shall restore such wetlands to their original condition. 48.12. SEVERABILITY. If any part of this Chapter is held to be unconstitutional or otherwise illegal, the remainder of this Chapter shall be deemed and held to be valid and remain in force and effect as if such portion had not been included herein. If this Chapter or any provision herein is held to be inapplicable to any person, property or work, such holding shall not affect the applicability hereof to any other person's property or work. 17 48.14 48.13. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The property within a designated wetland which is restricted hereby or for which a development or other restrictive easement is conveyed to the municipality shall not be subject to future special assessments for the costs of public improvements for which such assessments are authorized pursuant to Chapter 26 of the Municipal Code. 48.14. VARIANCE AND APPEALS. Subdivision 1. An application for variance or appeal to the Council shall be processed according to Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code. Subdivision 2. No variance may be granted which would allow any use that is prohibited in the zoning district in which the property is located or which will: A. Result in incompatible land uses or which would be detrimental to surface and groundwater resources. B. Increase the financial burdens imposed on the community through increasing floods and overflow of water onto land areas within this City or onto land areas adjacent to Rice Creek. C. Be not in keeping with land use plans and planning objectives for the City or which will increase or cause danger to life or property. D. Be inconsistent with the objectives of encouraging land uses compatible with the preservation of the natural land forms, vegetation and wetlands within the City. E. Include development of land and water areas essential to continue the temporary withholding of rapid runoff of surface water which contributes to downstream flooding, or water pollution, or development of land and water areas which provide groundwater recharge, or development which diminishes the land or water which are necessary to carry increased flows of stormwater following periods of heavy precipitation. 18 48.15 Subdivision 3. No permit or variance shall be issued unless the applicant, in support of his application, shall submit engineering data, surveys, site plans and other information as the City may require in order to determine the effects of such development on the affected land and water areas. 48.15. WETLAND ZONING DISTRICTS. Subdivision 1. Wetland Zoning District Map. . Pursuant to Chapter 48.02, the wetland zoning districts delineated in the referenced wetland zoning district map are hereby established. Subdivision 2. Wetland Zoning Districts by Legal Description. Pursuant to Chapter 48.02, the following described properties are hereby designated as wetlands: (see Appendix A) . Subdivision 3. Inclusive. The wetland zoning districts designated in Subdivisions 1 and 2 above are hereby established as wetland zoning districts for the municipality. 19 777 - ..y -1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSLh ± ATION Agenda u : 8.r. `' Banor:Nu. ,e17 94-117c C� ' R '�R'r ?..zpar Dare: 5-19-9 Cour:ci cion: May 23, 1994 L. Scec:al Order of tisi: _ CrTY C O UN CU.MTI`li G DAT.E :_ ?uniic Hearings g.: Cur-sent agenda C Council Business Isar Desc-iacon: Adopt Resolution No. 4571 Approving Charitable Gambling License for A One-Day, Off-Site Lawful Gambling Permit Ad.'s ir's racor 3 R. V1ew/Racorn=encacor.: %—� - No con:r en:s to suppie:aert this repot - Cor,—ent a`--.aced. ( piarar'oriSu4 narf (ar:nc^. suppie='Erstonee a as aecessarr.) cT l,ftARN': The North Suburban Chapter of the Minnesota Deer Hunter's Association has submitted an application to the City of Mounds View for a one-day, off-site lawful gambling permit. This organization has conducted such raffling events for the past several years. The North Suburban Chapter of the Minnesota Deer Hunter's Association is requesting to hold the raffling event on August 26, 1994 at the Bel-Rae Ballroom. •/ Michele Severson, Deputy Clerk • • RECOMMENDATION: RESOLUTION NO. 4571 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A CHARITABLE GAMBLING LICENSE FOR A ONE DAY, OFF-SITE LAWFUL GAMBLING PERMIT MINNESOTA DEER HUNTER'S ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the North Suburban Chapter of the Minnesota Deer Hunter's Association has submitted an application to the City of Mounds View to conduct a one-day, off-site lawful gambling event; and WHEREAS, the North Suburban Chapter of the Minnesota Deer Hunter's Association has requested to hold this one-day, off-site raffling event at the Bel-Rae Ballroom in the City of Mounds View; and WHEREAS, this raffle would take place on August 26, 1994; and WHEREAS, all paperwork for this application has been properly filed with the City of Mounds View. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View that the North Suburban Deer Hunter's Chapter of the Minnesota Deer Hunter's Association is approved to hold a one-day, off-site raffling event in the City of Mounds View at the Bel-Rae Ballroom on August 26, 1994. Adopted this 23rd day of May, 1994. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator Minnesota Lawful Gambling FOR BOARD USE ONLY FEE CHK LG220 Application for Authorization for NIT DATE (Rev. ` 4/2i93' Exemption from Lawful Gambling License Fill in the unshaded portions of this application for exemption and send it in at least 45 days before your gambling activity for processing. :Name and Address of Organization: / I Organization Name North Sububran ` Current/previous license number Current/previous exempt number Minnesota Deer Hunters Association ity 8974 Quinwood Ln Maple Grove Me 4A)5°2A9 gentNepin Chief Executive Officer Daytime Phone Number Treasurer (aytime� 4o4 On*ej Carol Altrichter ( 614 420-8947 Joe Langevin l Typeof Non:profit organization Check the box that indicates your proof of nonprofit Check the box below which indicates your type of organization status and attach a copy of the proof to the application. ❑ Fraternal ❑ IRS designation 0 Veterans ❑ Certification of good standing from the Minnesota 0 Religious - Secretary of State's office Other non-profit ❑ Affiliate of parent nonprofit organization(charter) Gambling Site '' . Name of site where activity will take place Bel'rae Ballroom • Street CityT State Zip code County 5394 Edgewood Dr Moundsvil wnship lMN 55112 Ramsey Date(s)of activity(for rattles,indicate the date of the drawing) S/Z C`g Types of Games Financr.al Report market Value of Prizes Expenses,Including (Including.Donations Game(s) Gross Receipts:' Cost of Prizes Net Profit .and:cash) :_ : Bingo ❑ Raffles Paddlewheels ❑ Tipboards ❑ Pull-tabs ❑ I declare all information submitted to the Distrbutor from whom gamblkig eq°lp►ner>i Was purchased Gambling Control Board is true, accurate, Distributor'slicense number and complete. I declare all financial information submitted to the Gambling Control_ Board is true,accurate,:andcomplete: —‘a_,-0 L 4 At T -t__!L 1-L--t— .,., /// Chief Executive Officer's Signature Date Chief Executive Officer's Signature - -`Date . Local-Unit of Government Acknowledgment I have received a copy of this application. This application will be reviewed by the Gambling Control Board and will become effective 30 days from the date of receipt by the city or county,unless the local unit of government passes a resolution to specifically prohibit the activity. A copy of that resolution must be received by the Gambling Control Board within 30 days of the date filled In below. Cities of the first Bass have 60 days in which to disallow the activity. City or County Township Township is City of county name • Township name 0 organized �e 0 unorganized' Signature y.o• -wing appli ion Signature of person receiving application ❑ unincorporated* /�/�V *Attach letter ` e Date received Title Date Received CH-i�,,� c? �4CC s--,—9 V . This form will be made available Mail with $25 permit fee and copy of White-Original in alternative format(i.e. large proof of nonprofit status to: Yellow-Board returns to print, braille) upon request. Gambling Control Board Organization to complete 1711 W. County Rd. B, Ste. 300 S. shaded areas Roseville, MN 55113