Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1993/07/26TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: SAMANTHA ORDUNO, CITY ADMINIST1ATOR DATE: JULY 20, 1993 RE: INDEX FOR WEEK OF JULY 26, 1993 - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING PACKET MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF JULY 26, 1993 . Council Meeting - July 26, 1993 - 7:00 p.m. ITEMS PROVIDED IN THIS WEEK'S COUNCIL PACKET • This Is It! Agenda Unapproved Minutes, July 12, 1993 Approved Minutes, June 28, 1993 ****************** ADMINISTRATOR'S SCHEDULE (Please note that this schedule is subject to change as meetings are scheduled, rescheduled or canceled. At any time Audrey, Michele, or Tim C. will have my most current schedule and a number where I can be reached at all times.) Monday, July 26th 9:30 a.m. Meeting with Tim Cruikshank/Michele Severson 7:00 p.m. Council Meeting Tuesday, July 27th 9:00 a.m. Staff Meeting MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE TWO J U LY 20, 1993 Wednesday, July 28th LMC Board Retreat - Winona Thursday, July 29th LMC Board Retreat - Winona Friday, July 30th LMC Board Retreat - Winona b:\index.726 AGENDA PAGE FOUR J U LY 26, 1993 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS: A. Presentation by Effective Golf Course Systems of the Golf Course Market Analysis COUNCILACTION: A T D Comments: B. Action on Ordinance No. 527, An Ordinance Amending Chapter 2.09 of the Municipal Code of the City of Mounds View Entitled, "Compensation of Mayor and Council, Staff Report No. 93-564C (Staff Presenter: Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator) ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor Linke Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Quick Councilmember Wuori COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: AGENDA PAGE FIVE J U LY 26, 1993 C. Consideration of Request of Bid Award for Paving Silver View Park Path Staff Report No. 93-565C, (Staff Presenter: Mary Saarion, Director of Parks, Recreation and Forestry) COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: D. Continued Discussion Regarding Request for Conditional Use PermitNariance For Gateway Foods, 2390 Highway 10, Planning Case No. 362-93, Staff Report No. 93-566C (Staff Presenter: Paul Harrington, City Planner) COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: E. Consideration of Contract Agreement for Environmental Services Regarding the Proposed Golf Course, Staff Report No. 93-567C (Staff Presenter: Samantha Orduno, City Administrator) COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 10. REPORTS: 1 Report of Councilmembers: AGENDA PAGE SIX J U LY 26, 1993 Blanchard: Quick: Wuori: 2. Report of Mayor Linke: 3. Report of Administrator: 4. Report of Staff: 5. Report of Attorney: NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION: AUGUST 2, 1993 7:00 P.M. NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 9, 1993 7:00 P.M. 11. ADJOURNMENT: b:\ag.J26 • APPROVED PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting July 26, 1993 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 CALL TO ORDER The Mounds View City Council was called to order on Monday, July 26, 1993. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: ALSO PRESENT: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: was said. by Mayor Linke at 7:00 p.m. Mayor Linke, Councilmembers Wuori, and Councilmember Quick Samantha Orduno, City Administrator; Paul Harrington, City Planner; Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator; Mary Saarion, Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director; Blanchard. MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Blanchard to approve minutes of July 12, 1993, Council Meeting as presented. VOTE: 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried. CONSENT AGENDA Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, read the Consent Agenda. Mayor Linke asked if there were any items the Council desired removed from the Consent Agenda. There were no items removed. MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Wuori to adopt the Consent Agenda as presented. 4KOTE: 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council Page Two Regular Meeting July 26, AI SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS There was no special order of business scheduled for this meeting. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR Lyle Nelson, 2357 Sherwood Road, congratulated the City Council on the FOCUS 2000 forums. Mr. Nelson stated that he believes this is a step in the right direction. Mr. Nelson stated that he is concerned that there are no sound barriers along Highway 610 (118) and that the noise at times is unbearable. Mr. Nelson asked if there was anything that Mounds View could do to obtain sound barriers along the stretch of highway that affects Mounds View residents. Mayor Linke stated that the City of Mounds View had contacted MnDOT some time ago and asked about the sound barriers and MnDOT stated that this was always part of the plan and there is no money budgeted to extend the barriers. Mr. Nelson stated that there was going to be a block party on Jackson and Laport Drive over the weekend and invited the Council to attend and observe the noise level. Mr. Nelson stated that he had called MnDOT and was told that they had received no official requests or recommendations from Mound View. Mr. Nelson asked if there was a timetable for the Harstad development. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, stated that Paul Harrington, City Planner, was working with the Harstad group to develop a timetable. Harrington reported that Mike Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor, had met with the construction manager and the Harstad group. Harrington was not in the office on Friday but will discuss the results of the meeting with Mr. Ulrich. Harrington suggested that Mr. Nelson call the office next week and he will go through the timetable with him. Mr. Nelson reported that the City Administrator and City Planner had visited a house that had a pool wall collapse due to the heavy rainfall and flooding conditions. John and Barb Savage are the property owners. Savage's phone number is 786-4856. Mr. Nelson stated that he was attending the meeting on their behalf as they became grandparents earlier in the day and were unable to attend. Mr. Nelson asked that someone from the City Council give the Savages a call. Paul Harrington, City Planner, discussed this issue with Barb Savage, who attended the Planning Commission meeting, to express her concern. Harrington reported that Short -Elliott -Hendrickson intends to shoot elevations to ensure that grading is being completed as specified. Harstad was also male aware of the problem. iliounds View City Council Page Three egular Meeting July 26, 1993 Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, commended the City and the City Council for the Festival In The Park. Mr. Frits stated that he was there all day and he heard no disparaging remarks, however, he heard many people say that there should be a Festival again next year. Mr. Frits suggested that the City put together a committee of more than five or six people to start making plans for next year's Festival. The only complaint Mr. Frits had was that there was no ice cream. Phyllis Blanchard stated that the ice cream vendor never showed up. Mayor Linke stated that the planning for next year will start real soon. Councilmember Wuori stated that the planning has already started. Mayor Linke stated that Irondale Marching band will be at the Festival and there will be a parade. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2806 Highway 10 - Minor Auto Repair Mayor Linke opened the public hearing to consider a request for Conditional Use Permit, Minor Auto Repair, 2806 Highway 10 (Planning Case No. 365-93) at •:13 p.m. Paul Harrington, City Planner, reviewed Staff Report No. 93-562C regarding the request for Conditional Use Permit, Minor Auto Repair, for 2806 Highway 10. Harrington stated that the Planning Commission had reviewed the conditional use permit request and recommended Council's approval. Harrington stated that all applicable zoning considerations had been adequately addressed by the applicant. Mayor Linke asked if the conditions listed on Council resolution were the same as those listed on the Planning Commission resolution. Paul Harrington, City Planner, read Resolution No. 4394 Approving the Conditional Use Permit Request by Ron Schmidt, 2806 Highway 10, Planning Case No. 365-93 for clarification of the conditions. Mayor Linke questioned the hours of operation of the business. Mayor Linke stated he would recommend extending the hours of work in the evening by one hour. Councilmember Blanchard stated concern with the parking of cars along Highway 10. Paul Harrington explained that Mr. Schmidt, property owner, has adequate boulevard parking and would not be parking cars along Highway 10. I,. Schmidt stated that he had no problem with the hours of operation as, generally, nothing is started after 9:00 p.m. Mounds View City Council Page Four .Regular Meeting July 26, 1411 Dave Coffey, 2757 Hillview Road, asked where the minor auto repair was going to be located. Mr. Coffey stated that he had not had the opportunity to look at the site plans. Mayor Linke stated that the location is directly west of the Amoco station. Paul Harrington stated that he received a call from Joyce Nelson, 7801 Groveland Road, inquiring as to what the requirements for this minor auto repair would be. Ms. Nelson stated that she was a resident who received a copy of the public hearing notice. Mr. Harrington explained the conditional use permit to Ms. Nelson and she stated that she had no problem with the minor auto repair being located there. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:24 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Blanchard to adopt Resolution No. 4394 Approving the Conditional Use Permit Request by Ron Schmidt, 2806 Highway 10, Planning Case No. 365-93 as presented. VOTE: 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Surface Water Management Utility Mayor Linke opened the public hearing to consider the Surface Water Management Utility at 7:25 p.m. • Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, stated that last month there had been an informational meeting on the Surface Water Management Plan to discuss the utility concept. Orduno stated that the Surface Water Management Plan was required by Law and gave a presentation on what a Surface Water Management Utility was. Orduno further stated that a Surface Water Utility is a stable financing method which provides a continuous source of revenue for surface water management without competing with the General Fund. Orduno introduced Rocky Keene of Short -Elliott -Hendrickson who presented some background of the Plan and to go over the specifics of the Plan. Mr. Keene stated that the development of the Plan was required by Law. The Plan addresses the water quantity and quality issues in`the City and allows local control of the water resources in the City. Mr. Keene explained the history of the plan and went through the Plan's major components such as goals and policies, development guidelines, engineering and planning guidelines, definition of the hydrologic system, management strategy, water quality issues, physical environment of the City and administration requirements for plan implementations. Mr. Keene further stated that the Capital Improvement Program was required by Law to be placed in the Plan. Keene stated that the City's Plan identified no large projects in the next five years. Keene stated that th Mounds View Plan identified several large future projects that may or may not be undertaken. Mounds View City Council egular Meeting Page Five July 26, 1993 Mr. Keene explained that the Council wished to use the existing fund which is comprised of development fees as the Storm Water Management Fund and maintain in it a balance of $100,000 to help fund related projects. Keene further explained the examples of projects that would be funded in the 5 Year Plan such as cleaning and maintenance of wetlands and their outlets, curb and gutter, storm sewer and catch basin costs associated withstreet improvement projects, maintenance and repair of the existing infrastructure, removal of sediment accumulation in existing wetlands and sedimentation ponds, regular maintenance such as street sweeping, catch basin cleaning, inspection of the drainage system, ditch cleaning and repair, administration related to water resources issued in the city, feasibility studies for drainage improvements and drainage system improvement projects. Keene pointed out some potential projects that could be undertaken such as the addition of curb and gutters to help alleviate the encroachment of water on the roadways and the cause for erosion. Keene stated that one important aspect of the plan is public involvement. Keene reviewed the project path that would be followed for projects to be undertaken. The City Council would order a feasibility study. After the feasibility study a public hearing and informational meeting would take II, The Council would then order plans and specifications for the roject.and, again a public hearing or information meeting would be held. The Council would then order the project and bids would be received. The bids would be accepted or rejected and construction would begin if the project were accepted. Orduno identified the administrative responsibilities that are placed on the City in terms of the Surface Water Management Plan. Orduno reported that the City's responsibilities would include, in part, land use regulation, sediment and erosion control, permits, capital improvements (non -watershed projects), conveyance system maintenance, participation and cooperation with the programs of the Rice Creek Watershed District, local plan review and amendments, wetland alteration, individual septic systems, ordinance review and amendment, comprehensive plan update, zoning map revision, hydrologic model update with land use/zoning changes and flood insurance study amendments. Orduno stated that a quarterly fee would be charged to all developed parcels within the City. The fee is based on how much water is contributed to the system. The fee will appear quarterly on property owner's water -and sewer bill. This method of funding is becoming very popular because it is a user fee concept where everyone would pay their fair share. Orduno stated that this utility is a dedicated source of funding for small and large projects within the City. r. Keene stated that the utility or user charge places costs on ontributors of runoff and water quality impacts, on a proportional basis. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Page Six July 26, Mr. Keene explained that to generate $114,000 annually, which projected over five years is $575,000, a formula based on total volume of run off from certain land uses was calculated. Mr. Keene described the formula and how the user charge is calculated. Based on this formula and calculations, each residential property owner would be billed $3.99 per quarter with a total annual. cost of $15.96. Orduno stated that to raise the same amount of money for storm water related projects through taxes, based on the current tax rate, the cost for a home valued at $75,000 would be $20.30, the owner of a home with a $100,000 value would be $33.31. The costs are less for the utility fee per household because it is spread out among all users. The tax rate could increase which would increase the cost to the property owners. With a flat fee the cost could remain consistent. Orduno stated that it could, however, go up in the future. Orduno stated that the utility ordinance could be introduced on August 9, 1993 with approval of the ordinance on August 23, 1993, publication of the ordinance on September 1, 1993, ordinance could become effective October 1, 1993, approval of Surface Water Management Utility Budget as part of the 1994 Budget in December of 1993 and implementation on January 1, 1994 with first billing in April of 1994. Julie Trude, 8391 Knollwood Drive, asked if Public Works will continue to . fund the projects that are presently taking place until the utility is fully funded. Mayor Linke stated that the projects are not funded by Public Works, but are funded by the Surface Water Management Fund, however, that fund is down to approximately $180,000 which will not last long and that the City is looking at major projects in the future. This utility would allow the City to look at major projects and still maintain $100,000 in the fund. Trude asked if the City intended to rip up roads and install storm drainage systems. Mayor Linke used Long Lake Road as an example of a project that the City knew needed storm drainage work and this project was undertaken in conjunction with the Long Lake Road Project. Mayor Linke stated that work will need to be undertaken on Ardan Avenue in 5 to 6 years. These are projects that would make use of the Surface Water Utility Fund. Julie Trude asked if those businesses that had created natural drainage ponds would receive a break in their portion of the fee. Mr. Keene stated that some communities credit certain criteria, but this would be brought forth in the ordinance that created the Surface Water Utility . Mr. Keene stated that even though the businesses have natural drainage ponds, the volume of run off would be the same only it will run • into the system over a longer period of time. Mounds View City Council Page Seven egular Meeting July 26, 1993 John Kroeger, 8280 Pleasant View Drive, asked if there is a specific date for this plan to be implemented. Mayor Linke replied that there is no certain time for the Surface Water Management Plan to be implemented. Mr. Kroeger asked if this plan addresses run off of water from neighboring communities. Mr. Kroeger explained that he receives run off from another city and for the last seven out of 8 years he has had a great deal of ponding and has had to pump out his property. Mr. Kroeger stated that he is looking for an answer to alleviate his ponding problem. Mayor Linke stated that the plan does not address the run off from other cities, but this problem will have to be addressed. James Paron, 2288 Highway 10, stated that there is a piece of property just south of Woodlawn Drive and north of County Road H, that looks like a park, had a nice culvert placed on the north side and 20 feet of plastic pipe placed on the east. Two feet of water just east of the path killed between 25 and 40 trees last winter. Mr. Paron is concerned that something should be done to drain off this water. •inke stated the City will follow up on this concern. Ren Zhon, 2741 Ardan Avenue, that during a flooding situation on June 23 water on Ardan Avenue ran over his driveway and into low spot of front lawn and then to his backyard. Mr. Zhon stated that he observed the drain in front of his house as being slow and the drain in his backyard was not flowing at all. Mayor Linke stated that Ardan Avenue was listed as a first priority as part of the Surface Water Management Plan. Mr. Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, stated that he questions whether the City needs a Surface Water Management Plan at this time. Mr. Frits stated that there- used to be frogs in the wetlands and now there are no frogs because the wetlands are gone. Mr. Frits stated that he suspects that the Surface Water Management Plan is something that someone drew up out of Ortonville and made state-wide. Mr. Frits stated that it is time that the people put into perspective the mandates from the Federal, State and County and turn government back to the people. Mr. Frits stated that according to the proposed Surface Water ;Utility the City wanted to keep a certain amount of money in the Surface Water Management Utility fund. This money would draw interest that the City would receive. Mr. Frits stated that he earned the money and he wants to draw interest on it himself. Mr. Frits stated that, by permission of the previous Councils, persons were given permission to build on a swamp. Mr. Frits stated that is why those persons have water �roblems. Mr. Frits stated that in regards to those persons who complain bout having water in from of their mailboxes, those persons have put their mailbox post too far back and the mailman makes a rut in front of the box Mounds View City Council Page Eight Regular Meeting July 26, 1410 that holds water. Mr. Frits stated that the pole should be moved and the problem would be solved. Mr. Frits stated that it was told to him that an elderly senior citizen was complaining to a Councilmember that the taxes in Mounds View were eating her up and that she was told by this Councilperson that if the taxes in Mounds View were too high, she should move. Mr. Frits stated that this utility is nothing more than a "tax". Mr. Frits stated that someone at another meeting told him that it was stated that Bill and Alice Frits should move out of Mounds View and then the City could get some young people in the City who would spend some money. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. Mayor Linke introduced Roger Harold, Effective Golf Course Systems, who explained that his company was commissioned by the City of Mounds View to conduct a market analysis on the proposed golf course site. Mr. Harold gave a brief background of Effective Golf Course Systems and introduced Mr. John Valerie of Effective Golf Course Systems who would also be presenting information regarding the market analysis fa. the golf course. Mr. Valerie commended the City Council on the construction of the Council Meeting Agenda, as residents concerns and requests are dealt with at the beginning of a Council Meeting rather than having the residents wait through many long items before being able to express their concerns. Mr. Valerie presented statistics regarding the growth of the game of golf in the state and indicated that the growth rate is great in the United States. Mr. Valerie stated that municipal courses are revenue producers and can take care their own needs and not rely on the taxpayers for their existence if well maintained. Mr. Valerie stated that the game of golf transcends the ages -- from juniors to seniors the game is enjoyed. Valerie indicated that there is a need for more beginning type golf courses. Mr. Valerie gave statistical information on the demographics of the proposed golf course stating that the City of Mounds View's course has excellent accessibility from 35W, Highway•10, Interstate 694 and Highway 65. Mr. Valerie discussed the market area including courses located three and six miles in proximity to the proposed site. Valerie indicated that the Mounds View course will offer practice and play. This will • give the Mounds View course great appeal. Mounds 'View City Council Page Nine •egular Meeting July 26, 1993 • Mr. Valerie and Mr. Harold discussed the types of golfers who would be attracted to the Mounds View site which include family and social golfers, middle handicap golfers and senior citizens. Also discussed was the sense of the market for the proposed golf course indicating that Effective Golf Course Systems was comfortable with their projections regarding costs and expenses. Orduno stated that the driving range will be a 50 station driving range and will be one of the largest in the metro area. Mayor Linke compared the proposed golf course in Mounds View to Majestic Oaks and Bunker Hills and stated that the Mounds View course will compete with those courses. Orduno stated that Effective Golf Course Systems determined the costs, revenues and expenses for the golf course including greens fees projected through the year 2014, conservative power cart rentals, the number of buckets projected to be sold through 2014, golf merchandising and food concession. Orduno stated that contact has been made with other operators of courses to ask them to look at the figures for the proposed golf course and all indications have been that Mounds View is right on the money with this course. Mr. Harold indicated that the three things that will determine the success of the course are quality design and Mounds View has an excellent design, quality construction and Mounds View has an excellent architect in having Garret Gil and thirdly, quality maintenance. Mr. Harold also indicated that the Park and Recreation Department could develop school programs and teach lessons which is another way to market and strategize the course. Mr. Valerie stated that the golf course business is a business that you buy and can sell over and over again. Julie Trude, on behalf of the cable audience, asked where the money would come from to finance the site, will the site break even, what is the revenue forecast of the course and who will manage the course. Orduno responded that the course will not be funded with the taxpayers' money, but by the sale of true revenue bonds. Revenues generated by the course will be dedicated to repayment of the bond. Orduno explained that to sell revenue bonds more than three years cannot be projected with a deficit. The City should start seeing revenues in excess of expenditures in three years. Orduno reported that a survey was conducted regarding the golf course and the residents were asked if they wanted a publicly owned course. The response was that the residents did want a public owned course. A golf course superintendent will be added as earlier as January 1, 1993. Mounds View City Council Page Ten Regular Meeting July 26, 1 111 Also, to be added would be seasonal and part time staff. If a full time staff person would be added it would be a 10 month individual. The City will manage this course locally. Orduno stated that at the last meeting of the Golf Course Task Force their charge was to cut $500,000 from the golf course. The Task Force cut $300,000_in primary costs and $200,000 in additional costs. None of the essentials of the course were cut. The cost of the club house was cut to $110,000 which will provide for an aesthetically pleasing, but smaller club house. The Task Force worked diligently to create a fun and fast course but challenging and of high quality. The Task Force did not cut anything that related to the quality of the course. Orduno stressed that the golf course revenues will go back into the golf course and that the revenues from this course will not help subsidize any other general fund expenditure. Orduno stated that the Council's direction from the very beginning was that this course would be self sustaining or the City could not consider it. B. Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator, reviewed Staff Report No. 93-564C regarding Ordinance No. 527, An Ordinance Amending Chapter 2.09 of the Municipal Code of the City of Mounds View Entitled, "Compensation of the Mayor and Council". Cruikshank reported that Ordinance No. 527 would repeal Ordinance No. 450, which set the Council's salaries at their existing rate, and would also amend Chapt 10 2.09 of the Mounds View Municipal Code entitled, "Compensation for Mayor and Council". Cruikshank reported that this compensation increase for Mayor and Council is proposed to bring Mounds View's City Council salaries in line with that of other municipalities in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. The current annual salary for the Mayor is $3600 and the proposed increase would make this salary $5100 per year. The Councill's salary is $3,300 per year and the proposed increase would make Council's salary $4,500. Cruikshank reported that state law and municipal code both state that a "salary increase cannot become effective until after the next municipal election." This ordinance could become effective following the special election to fill the vacant Council seat scheduled for August 24. This would allow for the salary increases to become effective August 27, 1993 which is 30 days after the ordinance is published. Orduno reported that this anticipated increase had been discussed at last year's budget hearing and amounts were placed in the budget. This ordinance is implementing increases that had been placed in the budget. Mounds View City Council Page Twelve Regular Meeting July 26, 1111 E. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, the golf course site is an unusual site and a special site but some inherent problems with the site have to be addressed. Orduno reported that the proposed golf course and adjacent trailway system involve several environmental issues such as wetland delineation and mitigation permitting. Orduno further reported that the Golf Course Task Force has recommended that the city utilize the services of Peterson Environmental. Consulting, Inc. for environmental services relating to the construction of the proposed golf course. The services proposed by PECI involve evaluation of the. course master plan, wetland delineation, agency coordination regarding permitting issues, mitigation design, Army Corps Section 404 Permit Modification, Rice Creek Watershed District Permit Certification, City Wetland Alteration Permit, MN DNR Water Appropriation Permit and to attend task force meetings. Orduno reported that the cost of these services from PECI are estimated at between $8,895 and $9,720 plus direct costs of approximately $1,780. The total cost for environmental services from PECI should not exceed $11,500. The Golf Course Task Force is asking that the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to execute an Agreement for Environmental Services with Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. at a cost not to exceed $11,500 to be paid for out of the Golf Course account. MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Wuori to Authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to Execute an Agreement for Environmental Services with Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. at a Cost Not to Exceed $11,1110 to be Paid for Out of Account No. 698-4120-303 VOTE: 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Councilmember Wuori asked what was currently in the fund. Orduno responded approximately $45,000. REPORTS Report of Councilmembers: Councilmember Blanchard stated that Williams Pipe Line has sent letters to all residents of Long Lake Road to inform them that hydrostatic testing of the pipe line will begin on or about August 10 for an indefinite period of time. Councilmember Wuori added that the testing is done with water. Councilmember Wuori : 1. Invited all to attend the Fantasticks. The opening weekend was last week. This coming week productions will be held on Thursday, Friday and Saturday and are all evening performances beginning at 7:30. Next week the productions will be on Friday and Saturday evening with a 410 matinee on Sunday. Councilmember Wuori stated that she enjoyed the 4gounds View City Council Page Eleven egular Meeting July 26, 1993 ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor Linke - yes Councilmember Blanchard yes Councilmember Wuori - yes 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried C. Mary Saarion, Director of Parks, Recreation and Forestry, reviewed Staff Report No. 93-565C regarding the bid award for paving of Silver View Park Path. Saarion reported that the City had been awarded a Lawcon grant for the paving of the path at Silver View Park. This grant was in the amount of $25,000. The City was given the okay to go ahead with the project in mid -June. Bids were opened August 26, 1993 and the low bidder, was Bituminous Consulting and Contracting at $14,840. Saarion checked references and all references reported that this company performed quality work. Saarion asked that the Council also consider the paving of an additional lineal footage of pathway with a not to exceed amount of $25,000. The additional lineal footage would pave from the from the parking lot to Silver Lake Road connection and increase the restoration of the path. • Councilmember Wuori asked about the bridge over the ditch. Saarion stated that the City has submitted two grants (ISTEA) for funding for the bridge. This additional paving would leave a 30 to 50 foot span over the ditch open. The trail would be finished in anticipation of having the bridge at some date. MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Blanchard to Accept the Bid from Bitumious Consulting and Authorize Staff to Work with Bituminous Consultants for Additional Linear Footage of Pathway and Sodding Along Existing Footage not to Exceed $25,000 VOTE: 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried D. Paul Harrington, City Planner, reviewed Staff Report No. 93-566C regarding the continued discussion of a request for Conditional Use Permit/Variance for Gateway Foods, 2390 Highway 10. Harrington reported that at the July 12, 1993, City Council Meeting, staff and the City Attorney were directed by the Council to draft a resolution of denial for the requested variance at 2390 Highway 10. Following this decision, the applicant decided to relocate the structure on the property. Harrington stated that he sees no problem in reviewing the alternative site plan and is asking Council to refer the request back to the Planning Commission level. No formal action is necessary by the City Council. • Council agreed to direct this request for an alternative site for the car wash back to the Planning Commission level. Mounds View City Council Page Thirteen •egular Meeting July 26, 1993 performance and that it is a good, fun musical. Tickets can be obtained by calling City Hall. Report of Mayor: Mayor Linke congratulated all those involved in the production of the Fantasticks and encouraged all to attend. The production is taking place at Mounds View High School. Councilmember Blanchard commended the performance and found it to be very enjoyable. Mayor Linke stated that he was exceedingly pleased with the turn out at the Festival In The Park celebration. Mayor Linke reported that he had a good time playing softball with the police department, selling brats for the Lions and participating in the dunk tank. Mayor Linke commented on last Wednesday and Thursdays FOCUS 2000 Forums be stating that the Forums were a success. Everyone that attended commented that they were happy with process and look forward to participating in the FOCUS 2000 project. Mayor Linke reported that the next step is to form the Sroject issue groups. Materials will be sent to those who attended the orums the second week of next month along with the results of the Forums. Participants will also receive.a form to fill out indicating that they would like to be a part of the study groups and hopes that those who participated will continue to participate and make FOCUS 2000 a success. Mayor Linke announced that the Ramsey County League of Local Government will be holding its membership meeting and that the general public is invited. The next meeting is scheduled for August 18, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. at Capital View and the subject will be that of Gun Violence. Mayor Linke stated that he hopes many will attend. Report of Administrator Samantha Orduno, City Administrator announced that the Special Election will be held August 24, 1993, to fill a vacant Council seat. Orduno encouraged anyone who wishes to vote absentee to pick up an absentee ballot application beginning July 28. Orduno announced that the polls will open at 7:00 a.m. and close at 8:00 p.m. and encouraged everyone to vote in this election. Report of Staff: No report Report of Attorney: No report Mayor Linke announced that the next Council Work Session would be held Aiugust 2, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. and that the next regularly scheduled Council eting is August 9, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. Mounds View City Council Page Fourteen Regular Meeting July 26, 1953 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before this Council, Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 9:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Michele Severson Recording Secretary • RESOLUTION NO, 4393 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WHEREAS, The City Council has reviewed the claims numbers: 38513 through 38554 in the amount of $ 107,574.18 39107 through 39280 in the amount of $ 163,394.33 through in the amount of $ through in the amount of $ TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 270,968.51 and has found said claims to be just and correct; (list of any exception) NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated 07/27/93 by the vote ayes nayes ATTEST: (SEAL) • Mayor Clerk -Administrator 4GE 1 C10-01 ;NDOR NO' VENDOR NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE DI INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT a:314 TRUEHART, LARRY CCOUNT NUMBER- 510 8 FOSS, IONE • ACCOUNT NUMBER- 39107 07/27/93 700-4121-901000 AMT- 39108 O7/.27/93 250-3500-352107 AMT- 7100 SCHMIDT, LARRY 39109 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 107 RUTTGER 'S 39 110 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-363000 AMT- T 111 MCFOA, TREASURER 39111 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-361000 AMT- r500 GETTER, MYRON ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER- 5=0 _: SEEKON, STEVE *ACCOUNT NUMBER- a'200 LARSON, ROY ACCOUNT NUMBER- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 39112 0 250-4_152-O20119 AMT- 250-4352-020125 AMT- 9113 07/27/9:3 250-4352-020119 AMT- 39114 07/27/93 250-4352-020119 AMT- 250-4 _:5'2-020 127 AMT- 4Ca4 DUB I EL , JOANNE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351 3223 WILLIAMS, DAVE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 391 15 07/27/93 -160011 AMT- :39116 07/27/93 250-4351-160011 AMT- +22 S ASSOC OF METRO MUN I C I * 39117 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-30:3000 AMT- 103 MAHN, JASON ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER- • =:9118 07/27/93 250-4352-020120 AMT- 250-435'2-O'20119 AMT- 39.O0 _,9.00 32.00 32.00 70.00 - BRICK 70.00 25.00 SEVERSON 25.00 07/27/93 128.00 DESC:-UMPIRE FEE DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 40.00 40.00 DESC-REFUND - 5473 ADAMS VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 07/27/93 3Q.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 32.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 70.00 DESC-RESERVATIONS VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 25.00 DESC-MEMBERSHIP - VENDOR TOTAL 112.00 16.00 128.00 07/27 /Q3 A4.00 64.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 07/27/93 272.00 32.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE 240.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 272.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR STEPHANIE VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR ALYSSA VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 47.94 47..714 DESC-MEDIATION HANDBOOK FOR C VENDOR TOTAL 47. 94 07 / 7 /9:_ 152.00 64.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE 88.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 152.00 ;GE 2 C10-01 :NDOR . NO VENDOR NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE DI INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 1*PETERSON, JERRY D 39119 07/27/93 CCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4:51-160011 AMT- `205 KNUTTILA, JED ACCOUNT NUMBER- ' 306 NELSON, NE I L ACCOUNT NUMBER- .206 MAGORIS, CATHY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 105 FULLER, CATHY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 39 120 07/27/93 250-4351-020031 AMT- 39121 121 07/27/93 250-4351-160011 AMT- 39122 07/27/93 250-4351-160011 AMT- 3 9 1 '2. 0 7/ 2 7 /9 :3 250-4?51-160011 AMT- 219 BORGENDALE, LAURIE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351- FISCHER, BARBARA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351- :39124 07/27/93 160011 AMT- :39125 07/27/93 160011 AMT- ;230 GUBASH, THOMAS 39126 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-354253 AMT- -:235 LEPORE, JEANNETTE 39127 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160011 AMT- ='4:�: VOGT , R I CHARD ACCOUNT NUMBER- 244 W I LCZEK , JON ACCOUNT NUMBER- 209 NAYLOR, JULIE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 39128 07/27/93 250-4351-160011 AMT- 39129 07/27/9:3 250-4351-160011 AMT- 9130 07/27/93 250-3500-351024 AMT- .1 0 1 HODGES, AMY 39131 07/27/93 !II 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR MATTHEW VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 315.00 315.00 DESC-TENNIS CLINIC COACH VENDOR TOTAL 315.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR TAWNY VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR STEPHANIE VENDOR TOTAL. 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR AMANDA VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 .2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR KEL.SEY VENDOR TOTAL :' . 00 07/27/93 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR KEELY VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27 /93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR CINDY VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 - 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR GINA VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/9: 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR AMANDA VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR BREANNA VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 25.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 25.00 25.00 JGE. 3 ' `-C10-01 �NDOR CHECK CHECK NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE CCOUWT NUMBER- 250-4352-160107 AMT- ,103 COYLE, JENNIFER 39132 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 AMT- -110 FEENEY, BILL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 39133 07/27/93 250-4352-020128 AMT- ^200 LIGHTBODY, WARREN 39134 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- -201 ALLSUP, JOYCE 39135 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352107 AMT- '202 BERMARDY, DAVID 39136 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351028 AMT- BRINGEWATT, HELEN 39137 07/27/93 CCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352107 AMT- 7204 FULLER, [0ROTHY 39138 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-35(-y0-352107 AMT- `205 GROSSKOPF, BETTY 39139 07/27y93 /206 LINDQUIST, CHRIS 39140 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- -.::'50-3500-354253 AMT- 39141 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352107 AMT- 39142 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-354241 AMT- `209 OTTERNESS, SHELLY 39143 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-354238 0 AMT- 07/27/93 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER _ MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE DI INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 25.00 DESC- -HINCKLEY CASIN VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 07/27/93 64.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 64.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 32.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 39.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL &4.00 64.00 64.00 64.00 32.00 32.00 39.00 39.00 07/27/93 5.00 5.00 DESC-REFUND FOR CONNIE VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 39.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL O7/27/93 39.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 07y27/93 39.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 22.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 0 7 / 27/93 39.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 22.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 18.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 5.0O 39.00 39.00 39.00 39.0O 39.00 39.00 22.00 22.00 39.00 39.00 22.00 22.00 18.00 1@.00 AGE' 4 '-C10-01 NDOR N VENDOR NAME 210 PRESTON, C. J. ACCOUNT NUMBER- '211 TESMAR, MARION ACCOUNT NUMBER - CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE :39144 07/27/93 250-3500-354233 AMT- 39145 07/27/93 250-3500-352107 AMT- 213 ; BROWN, DONALD S. 39146 07/27/9:3 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 215 HAFSLUND, GORDON 39147 07/27/9:3 ACCOUNT -NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- '216 HAUCK, GERALD C 39148 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 217 LENZ, LOWHARD ACCOUNT NUMBER- 4110 '21• LOVEGREN, BILL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 39149 07/27/93 700-4121-901000 ANT- 39150 07/27/93 700-4121-901000 AMT- '219 SPITZER, AUGUST 39151 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 220 THOMSON, RONALD 39152 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-3991-000000 AMT- '221 ARBOE, TERESA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 34 J 1 5 3 0 7/ 2 7 /9 1 u 250-4351-160011 AMT- "222 ARMSTRONG, MARK ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351- '223 CAMF'EAU , N I COLE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351- :� CAPELLE, CHELLA 9 154 07/27/93 160011 AMT- 39155 07/27/93 160011 AMT - 39156 07/.27/ 93 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE NMBR DATE 07/27/93 22.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 =19.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 40.00 DESC-REFUND - VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 30.00 DESC-REFUND - VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 40.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 DESC-REFUND - VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 40.00 DESC-REFUND - VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 40.00 DESC-REFUND - VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 90.00 DESC-REFUND - VENDOR TOTAL INVOICE DI AMOUNT 22.00 2'2.00. 39.00 39.00 40.00 2468 CO RD H2 40.00 30.00 3110 GROVELAND _:0.00 40.00 2332 SHERWOOD R 40.00 30.00 8467 EASTWOOD F 30.00 40.00 5169 EDGEWOOD r 40.00 40.00 7888 BONA ROAD 40.00 90.00 7618 EDGEWOOD D 90.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR THERESA VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR ANGELA VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 iGE 5 '-C10-01 �NBOR N*VENDOR NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER - CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 250-4351-160011 AMT- -225 CAPELLE, JAIME 39157 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160011 AMT- '226 CLAFLIN, JESSICA 39158 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160011 AMT- 227 DEGE, CARISSA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 39159 07/27/93 250-4351-160011 AMT- Z28 GEARMAN, ASHLEY 39160 07/27y93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160011 AMT- '229 JENSEN, JASON ACCOUNT NUMBER- 39161 07/27/93 250-4351-160811 AMT- jQHNSON, BECKY -OCCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351- 39162 07/27/93 -231 JOHNS3N, CARLEY 39163 07y27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160011 AMT- `232 LONG, MIKE ACCOUNT NUMBER- `233 MADSEN, RACHEL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 39164 07/27/93 250-4351-160011 AMT- 39165 ()7/27/93 250-4351-160011 AMT- 7234 MCDQWELL, AUBREY 39166 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160011 AMT- 7235 MENTH, MINDY ACCOUNT NUMBER- . MENTH, SHELLE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 0 39167 07/27y93 250-4351-160011 AMT- 39168 07/27y93 250-4351-160011 AMT- ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 2.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27y93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DES[ -REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR ROBIN VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND VENDORTOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27y93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 ,.GE' 6 '-C10-01 NDOR N•VENDOR NAME 237 MURPHY, JOHN ACCOUNT NUMBER- 238 PERSONS, SARA ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 39169 07/27/93 250-4351-160011 AMT- - 39 170 07/27/93 250-4.351-160011 AMT- 39170 07/27/93 250-4351-160011 AMT- 239 RUDOLPH, VICTOR 39171 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160011 AMT- 240 THIELE, GINA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 241 TROTTA, LEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- y2HOU, REN CCOUNT NUMBER- 244 SIMMONS, DAVID ACCOUNT NUMBER- 246 CLELAND , LO I S ACCOUNT NUMBER- 39172 07/27/93 250-4351-160011 AMT- 39173 07/27/93 250-4351-160011 ANT- 39174 07/27/93 250-4351-1 60011 AMT- 39175 07/27/93 250-4353-020213 A1T- 9 176 07/27/93 250-3500-354255 AMT- 247 PIERSIAK, MICHELLE 39177 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-:5423:3 AMT- 243 STAPLES, BARB ACCOUNT NUMBER- :3':9173 07 /27 /93 250-3500-351031 AMT- 311 MAL I LOWSKI , ROD 39179 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 AMT- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- =:16 TOBIASON, NEIL •CCOUNT NUMBEF:- _: 9 1 8 0 250-4352-020119 07/27/93 AMT - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE DI INVOICE NMBR DATE. AMOUNT 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR NICOLE VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/Q3 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 4.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND F.OR MAGG I E VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR NATAL I E VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/93 2.00 2.00 DESC-REFUND FOR HEIDI VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 07/27/9•3 400. 00 400.00 DESC-DIRECTOR/MUSIC DIRECTOR VENDOR TOTAL 400.00 07/27/93 22.00 DESC-REFUND FOR VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93: 22.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/'93 12.00 DESC-REFUND FOR VENDOR TOTAL ti 00 :32.00 07/27/93 DESC-UMPIRE FEE DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 128.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE 2'2.00 SPENCER '72.00 22.00 22.00 1.2.00 CARISSA 12.00 64.00 64.00 128.00 iGE 7 '-C10-01 ~` DOR Nj&VENDOR NAME 3321 LADWIG, LOREN ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 39181 07/27/93 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 64.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL �201 MITTELSTADT, DON 39182 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- -218 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS 39183 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-180029 AMT- 07/27/93 96.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 128.00 64.00 64.00 96.00 96.{x0 DI 155976 07/15/93 216.94 216.94 DESC-PRIZES FOR FESTIVAL GAME VENDOR TOTAL 216.94 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352107 AMT- 39.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 39185 07/27/93 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020018 AMT- 325.00 DESC-FOOTBALL VENDOR TOTAL /220 MILLER, MIKE 39186 07/27/93 CCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- `050 AEC - ENGINEERS & DES* 39187 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 680-4120-703000 AMT- l626 AIRSIGNAL, INC. 39188 07/27y93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-303000 AMT- -000 ALL-AMERICAN BOTTLING* 39189 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-3912-000000 4985 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY* 39190 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 j123 AMERICAN OFFICE PRODU* 39191 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 39191 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 39191 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 39191 CCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-112000 07/27y93 AMT- 07/27/93 O7/27/93 ro,/- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 07/27/93 m'/`- 07/27/93 AMT- 39.00 325'.00 CLINIC COACH 325.00 07/27y93 160.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 160.00 6361 07/01/93 49.00 49.00 DESC-COATING INSP - MILEAGE VENDOR TOTAL 49.00 5492349 07/01/93 30.69 30.69 DESC-VOICE MONTHLY - JULY VENDOR TOTAL 30.69 88199 07y12/93 241.33 241.33 DESC-POP FOR P/W GARAGE VENDOR TOTAL 241.33 M12670716 07/16/93 106.87 106.87 DESC-MATS & TOWELS VENDOR TOTAL 106.87 266692 118.53 266813 170.99 266529 92.13 266426 62.24 07/16/93 118.53 DESC-EASEL BOARD & STAND 07/16/93 170.99 DESC-EASEL BOARD,STAND,INDEXE 06/30/93 92.13 DESC-MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 07/27/93 70.11 DESC-COPY PAPER AGE -C10-01 :NDOR N•VENDOR NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 100-4190-114000 39191 100-4190-114000 100-4190-112000 A.85 AMER I CAN SEMI FARTS Et* 39192 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 ,260 ANCHOR .PAPER CO. 39193 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- '570 BARTON SAND AND GRAVE* :39194 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 700 BEYER'S EXCAVATING 39195 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-705000 AMT- :381 BEACON SPORTS PRODUCT* 39196 4CCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 CCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160119 07/27/93 AMT- AMT- °000 RIFFS, INC 39 197 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-356000 AMT- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-356000 AMT- 7.87 DESC-STAPLER 266637 07/09/93 217.10 41.37 DESC-RING BINDERS 175.73 DESC-COPY PAPER VENDOR TOTAL 668.86 617339 07 /01 /93 19.84 19.84 DESC-TRUCK BRAKES VENDOR TOTAL 19.84 724932-00 06/23/93 132.61 132.61 DESC-COLORED PAPER VENDOR TOTAL 132.61 06/30/93 93.22 DESC-FINE SAND VENDOR TOTAL 93.2 93.22 DI 07/05/93 595.00 595.00 DESC-EXCAVATE - HILLVIEW F'ARK VENDOR TOTAL 595.00 I10920 =: 07/07/Q3 195.22 100.00 DESC-IMPACT BASE L/ANCHOR SET 95.22 DESC-IMPACT BASE L/ANCHOR SE1 VENDOR TOTAL 195.22 951.86 53.26. 07/27/93 1005.12 DESC-JULY SERVICE DESC-JULY SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 1005.12 -1105 BLAINE,. CITY OF 39198 07/27/93 8113 06/30/93 50190.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 555-4120-802000 AMT- 501 90.50 DESC-1ST HALF '93 FIRE I MF'RV VENDOR TOTAL 50190.50 3200 BOB'S PERSONAL COFFEE* 39199 07/27/93 55452 07/17/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 31.98 DESC-COFFEE VENDOR TOTAL 970 BOULDER FABRICATORS, * 39200 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4:360-160000 AMT- -.750 BRAD RAGAN INC 39201 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- "000 BRIGHTON VETERINARY H* 39202 07/27/93 •CCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-303000 AMT- 31 . R 31.98 07/01 /93 96.00 96.00 DESC-2 PC 3/16" HRS(LABOR-MA? VENDOR TOTAL 96.00 052140 07/13/93 113.47 113.47 DESC-TIRES FOR HOWARD PRICE VENDOR TOTAL 113.47 06/30/9S 283.00 233.00 DESC-MAY/JUNE SERVICE iGE 9 `-Cl0-01 N NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE CHECK CHECK /020 C-D PRODUCTS, INC 39203 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-343301 39203 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-343301 3016 CHAMPION AUTO 39204 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 )110 CHEROKEE POWER EQDIPM* 39205 ACCOUNT NUMBER- !000 CLIMB THEATRE ACCOUNT NUMBER- .1000 COAST TO COAST ACCOUNT NUMBER- 0 CCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- 100-4360-170000 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE DI INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 00014310 07/13/93 AMT- 123.54 DESC-2' X 6~ 07/27/93 00014293 07/09/93 AMT- 437.72 DESC-3' X 3' VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 07/27/93 AlvlT- 39206 07/27y93 250-4351-160028 AMT- 39207 100-4260-160000 39207 700-4121-160000 39207 100-4260-122000 39207 100-4260-160000 39207 100-4360-160000 39207 100-4360-160000 39207 100-4360-160000 39207 100-4360-160000 39207 100-4360-160000 07/27/93 m`/- 07/27y93 Ar//- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 07/27/93 AMT- O7/27/93 AMT- O7/27/93 AMT- O7/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- O7/27/93 AMT- 4200 07/14/93 ;4.22 DESC-OIL FOR VENDOR TOTAL 128872 07/13/93 123.54 BANNER - BLUE P 437.72 COROPLAST SIGNS 561.26 4.22 4.22 59.62 59.62 DESC-5 LB 095 LINE VENDOR TOTAL . 59.62 07/01/93 150.00 150.00 DESC-"UGLY DUCKLING" PERFORM VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 02240 3.83 002602 6.04 00246 2.76 002575 3.61 002599 7.00 &2236 22.34 01922 12.75 01955 84.71 01938 3.40 07/12/93 3.83 DESC-LOCK 07/15/93 6.04 DESC-BATTERIES 07/12/93 2.76 DESC-PULL 07/13/93 3.61 DESC-BOX OF STAPLES 07/15/93 7.00 DESC-SPARK PLUGS � 07/12/93 22.34 DESC-PAINT BRUSHES 07/02/93 12.75 DESC-3# SCREEWS FOR DECK-GREE 07/07y93 84.71 DESC-PAINT SUPPLIES 07/06y93 3.40 DESC-CAULK VENDOR TOTAL 146.44 5822 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER 39209 07/27/93 354193 07/14/93 186.32 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-513000 AMT- 186.32 DESC-REPAIR #A3541 VENDOR TOTAL 186.32 ,000 COPY SALES ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER- 0 39210 07/27/93 008904 07/16/93 66.40 100-4200-160000 AMT- 66.40 DESC-TONER 39210 07/27/93 008630 07/09/93 1013.09 100-4190-401000 AMT- 1013.09 DESC-SEGMENT 5 EXCESS COPIES VENDOR TOTAL 1079.49 AGE 10 C10-01 NDOR CHECK CHECK NOVENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE '050 DCA, INC. 39211 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-7403000 AMT- 100 D-ROCK CENTER & POWER* 39212 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-123000 AMT- )650 DATA -CAL CORPORATION :39213 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-703000 AMT- '700 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMEN* 39214 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4122-515000 39214 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4122-515000 985 DEPT OF ADMIN., MICRO* :39215 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 925 FEDORS MARKET *CCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120- _:0:7:000 39216 250-4353-1 60212 39216 250-4353-1 6.0212 39216 250-4353-160212 39216 250-4352-160130 39216 250-4:353-1 60'2 12 39'21 6 250-4 1-1 60029 39216 100-4110-303000 3921A 250-4353-160212 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 556:= 59 06/30/9 3 132.45 132.45 DESC-ADMIN FEE FLEX PLAN VENDOR TOTAL 132.45 4803 06/25/93 19.15 19.15 DESC- HOMEL I TE PUMPS VENDOR TOTAL 19.15 07/27/93 137.00 DESC-WORDF'ERFECT VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 '39409 AMT- 817.41 07/27/93 39403 AMT- 79.53 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/9: AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 •J AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- z000 FEED -RITE CONTROLS IN* 39218 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT - 5000 FOCUS NEWS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 392 19 100-4360-1 60000 DI - Jl.� 137.00 6.0 UPGRADE 137.00 07/1:3/'='3 817.4.1 DESC-PVC PIPE 07 / 13 /93 79.53 DESC-8X6 PVC SEWER VENDOR TOTAL 896.94 063048 06/30/93 5.87 5.87 DESC-BILLING REPORTS VENDOR TOTAL 5.87 07/27/93 41 .90 41.90 DESC-CANDY BARS 7 POPSICLES 07/27/93 31.27 31.27 DESC-POP & POPSICLES 13280 07/12/93 41.72 41.72 DESC-CANDY BARS 06 /22 / 9:3 7.37 7.37 DESC-MISC GROCERIES 06/28/93 88. S 4 88.833 DESC-POP & CANDY 04/2 /92. 5.73 5.73, DESC-CANDY & MISC GROCERIES 13241 07/02/93 47.05 47.05 DESC-MISC SUPPLIES 07/27/93 20.42 20.42 DESC-POP & POPSICLES VENDOR TOTAL 284.29 A919 06/30/9= 10.00 10.00 DESC-DEMURRAGE CHARGE VENDOR TOTAL 10.00 07/27/93 1824 07/06/93 28.47 AMT- 28.47 DESC-PAVED PATH -SILVER VIEW VENDOR TOTAL 28.47 '895 FRIENDLY CHEVROLET GE* 39220 07/27/93 11,CCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 20.019 07/14/93 11.51 11.51 DESC-PLATE KI `GE 11 `-C10-01 N9 VENDOR NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW CHECK CHECK INVOICE NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE 39220 100-4260-122000 39220 100-4260-122000 07/27/93 202270 07/02/93 AMT- 63.90 BESC-SWITCH 07y27/93 203061 07/14y93 AMT- 59.06 DESC-SWITCH A VENDOR TOTAL K)40 G E CAPITAL CORPORATI* 39221 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-401000 AMT- 080 G & K SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT 0 CCOUNT NUMBER- WUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUM8ER- '100 G & T TRUCKING ACCOUNT NUMBER- `130 GTA INC ACCOUNT NUMBER- 39222 100-4260-355000 100-4260-240000 100-4270-240000 100-4360-240000 700-4121-240000 730-4121-240000 39222 100-4260-355000 100-4260-240000 100-4270-240000 100-4360-240000 700-4121-240000 730-4121-240000 COMPAN* 39224 1/0-4360-160000 39225 250-4353-160210 07/27/93 AMT- AMT - AMT - AMT- AMT- AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27y93 AMT- 1879 GOPHER STAGE LIGHTING* 39226 07/27193 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-160213 AMT- INVOICE AMOUNT 63.90 59.06 134.47 12799564 07/06/93 114.86 114.86 DESC-INSTALLMENT/PAYMENT VENDOR TOTAL 114.86 747806 07/14/93 90.80 8.60 DESC-TOWELS & RAGS 11.47 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL 23.97 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL 15.87 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL 15.02 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL 15.87 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL 744245 07/07/93 132.22 8.60 DESC-TOWELS & RAGS 19.60 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL 32.10 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL 24.75 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL 23.16 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL 24.01 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL VENDOR TOTAL 223.02 78199 07/13/93 204.00 204.00 DESC-CLAY VENDOR TOTAL 204.00 DI 96412 07/16/93 25.56 25.56 DESC-2 - SET OF WOOD BINGO BA VENDOR TOTAL 25.56 2413 07/09/93 82.76 DESC-GEL VENDOR TOTAL 5880 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL* 39227 07/27/93 3060419 06/30/93 157.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-303000 AMT- 157.50 DESC-JUNE SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 157.50 3�2-18 07/27/93 497-864505-1 07/08/93. 4 4.'135 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-160000 AMT- 22.18 DESC-WHITE MARKING PAINT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 22.17 DESC-WHITE MARKING PAINT VENDOR TOTAL 44.35 ,975 GROVE NURSERY CENTER 39229 4 CCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-121000 AMT- 38.24 DESC-PLANTS VENDOR TOTAL 38.24 iGE ' 12 C10-01 :NDOR N•VENDOR NAME ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT :300 HILTI, INC. 39230 07/27/93 51894101 07/02/93 46.36 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 1 00-4'60-123100 AMT- 46.36 DESC-PIN DNN 622 MX VENDOR TOTAL 46.36 1000 HYMAN FREIGHTWAYS '39231 07/27/93 07/27/93 50.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-353208 AMT- 50.00 DESC-REFUND FARM: RENTAL FEE VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 A800 HOLMES ACCOUNT ACCOUNT & GRAVEN NUMBER- NUMBER- :92:3'2 100-4160-301000 100-2303-000901 07/27/93 AMT- AMT- 422'26 06/23/93 2702.59 2554.09 DESC-LEGAL SERVICES 148.50 DESC-LEGAL SERVICES VENDOR TOTAL 2702.59 4400 I NGMAN LABORATORIES, * 39233 07/27/93 07/27/93 82.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-303000 AMT- 82.50 DESC-ANALYSES VENDOR TOTAL 82.50 INSTY-PRINTS 39234 07/27/93 17378 07/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-343000 AMT- 184.25 DESC-THANK YOU'S VENDOR TOTAL 184.25 & PARKING - 5 104.zL� Z45 L I LL I E SUBURBAN NEWSP* 392;35 07/27/93 67521 06 / _,0 /93 17O.30 GCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-341000 AMT- 151.38 DESC-LEGAL NOTICES CCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4140-341000 AMT- 18.92 DESC-LEGAL NOTICES VENDOR TOTAL 170.30 4580 L I NKE , SHARON 39236 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4:352-160107 AMT- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-16O210 AMT- 180O LOCATOR & MONITOR SAL* 39237 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-513O00 AMT- 1000 LORENZ BUS SERVICE, I* 3923 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-1 60O2R 39228 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160028 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160028 7 300 M R P A ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER- • '7492:7 .9 250-435 2-1601 19 250-4352-16012.0 250-4352-160128 J 250-4352-160125 07/'27/9' AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 27.27 18.:30 DESC-BAt:ERY GOODS 8.47 DESC-POSTERBOARD & STENCILS VENDOR TOTAL 27.27 DI W: 03085 07/07/93 79.00 79.00 DESC-REPAIR EXOTOX.CALIBRATIC VENDOR TOTAL 79.0O 933483 87.00 933433 3 103.00 122.00 07/27/93 001058 AMT- 1400.0O AMT- 200.00 AMT- 85.00 AMT- 100.00 07/09/93 87.00 DESC-TRANSPORTATION TO CHEEP� 07/02/93 108.00 DESC-TRANSPORTATION TO MINNE# 07/16/93 122.00 DESC-TRANSPORTATION TO SHAKOF VENDOR TOTAL 317.00 07/02/93 1785.00 DESC-SOFTBALL ST/REG TRNY DESC-SOFTBALL ST/REG TRNY DESC-SOFTBALL ST/REG TRNY DESC-SOFTBALL ST/REG TRNY VENDOR TOTAL 1785.00 BR? BR7 BR- BR" 'AGE 13 C10-01 :NDOR 110VENDOR NAME ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT '750 MASYS CORPORATION 39240 07/27/93 20606 07/08/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 99.56 DESC-MISC PARTS VENDOR TOTAL :'170 METRO WASTE CONTROL C* 39241 99.56 99.56 07/27/93 51320693 07/01 /9 3 46527.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-323000 AMT- 4652 7.00 DESC-SEWER SERVICE - AUGUST VENDOR TOTAL 46527.00 :420 M I CROWAREHOUSE 39242 07/27/93 A1521830 06/30/93 49.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-703000 AMT- 49.00 DESC-PICTURE PAkCGM PCX VENDOR TOTAL 49.00 442 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPO* 39243 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 39243 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 :448 MIDWEST SPECIALTY SAL* 39244 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-511000 39244 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-1 60000 • 1400 MIRACLE RECREATION EQ* 39245 - ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-511000 :690 NORTH STAR TURF, INC - 39'246, ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-121000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 Y200 NORTHERN STATES ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT OCCOUNT NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- POWER* 39247 100-4270-325000 100-4270-325000 1 00 - 4230- 3'2 1 000 100-4360-321000 1 00- 4360- 3'2 1 000 770-4.121-324000 100-4230-321000 100-42' 30-3'21000 100-4270-325000 100-4270-325000 100-436 0-321000 1 00-43!_-&0-:= 21 000 100-4360-321000 100-4360-:321 000 100-4360-321000 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/9:3 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- AMT- 07/2 7/93 AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- 99 79 07 / 1: 3 /93 6.21 DESC-DUMP CHARGE 9785 07/06/93 35.02 DESC-MATERIALS & VENDOR TOTAL 6.21 35.0'2 DUMP CHARGE 41.23 L769 07/12/93 786.43 786.43 DESC-FARTS 2752 07 / 1.2/9 ? 44.34 44.86 DESC-SAFETY SWITCH VENDOR TOTAL 831.29 354819 07 /0'9 /93 127.45 127.45 DESC-TUBE STRT PLASTIC LIGHT VENDOR TOTAL 127.45 570940 07 /08 /9:3 875.52 291._6 DESC-15 BAGS OF FERTILZER 58•3.66 DESC-30 BAGS OF FERTILZER VENDOR TOTAL 875.52 12.31 139.69 /.4 110.44 16.52 6.66 6.4:3 3.41 156.99 109. 70.23 253.64 50.47 -32. 3:3 5A.09 07/27/93 7721.92 EtESC-HWY 10-SILVER LAKE RD SI DESC-HWY 10-CO RD H2 SIGNAL DESC-1755 COUNTY ROAD I W-SIR DESC-7901 GREENWOOD DR DESC-5:324 JACKSON - LAMBERT DESC-3'228 DESC-2271 DESC-2815 DESC-2'234 DESC-5510 DESC-2710 DESC-2401 DESC-2E:15 t'ESC-2815 DESC-2335 SPRING LAKE CO RD J W - SIREN # ARDAN AVE - SIREN HIGHWAY 10 QUINCY ST - SIGNAL CO ROAD I W HIGHWAY 10 ARDAN AVE ARDAN AVE KNOLL DR - GREENFIE 1GE. 14 -C10-01 NDOR N110 VENDOR ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NAME NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 100-4360-321000 1 00-436 0-3'2000 100-4360-321000 100-4360-321000 730-4121-321000 770-4121-324000 700-4121-321000 700-4121-321000 700-4121-321000 700-4121-321000 700-4121-321000 100-4190-321000 1 00-4190-22'2000 700-4121-322000 100-4260-322000 100-4260-321000 700-4121-322000 700-4121-322000 700-4121-322000 700-4121-321000 700-4121-322000 ,2 NORHTERN STATES POWER* 39251 CCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-513000 '500 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO* 9252 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-343000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-343000 39252 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350- 330000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-330000 -000 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE C* 39253 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-511000 15c:0 PAPER PRODUCTS PLUS 39254 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-160213 39254 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4 353-1 602 10 39254 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-435:3-160210 9254 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-435.3-160213 1110 FARTS PLUS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMT- 20.19 AMT- 19.13 AMT- 9.97 AMT- 7.36 AMT- 36.19 AMT- 13.04 AMT- 91.95 AMT- 2117.90 AMT- 1615.26 AMT- 916.02 AMT- 105.10 AMT- 1266.70 AMT- 48.78 AMT- 22.00 AMT- 24.88 AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- 07 /27 /93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- AMT- 07 /27 /9 +: AMT- AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- DESC-5214 DESC-5214 DESC-2330 DESC-2764 DESC-5396 DESC-5472 DESC- 51 00 DESC-2401 DESC-2426 DESC-'2450 DESC-7545 DESC-2401 DESC-2401 DESC-2450 DESC-2466 REGISTER INVOICE AMOUNT Di LONG LAKE RD - RANI LONG LAKE RD - RANE COUNTY ROAD I W ARDAN AVE RAYMOND AVE ADAMS STREET LONG LAKE ROAD HWY 10 BRONSON DR BRONSON DR GROVELAND RD- HWY 10 - CITY HALL HWY 10 - CITY HALL BRONSON DR BRONSON DR - GARAGE 282.40 DESC-2466 BRONSON DR - GARAGE 18.18 DESC-2524 BRONSON DR - WELL # 14.15 DESC-7545 GROVELAND RD-WELL # 19.62 DESC-2408 HILLVIEW RD -WELL # 26.21 DESC-2408 HILLVIEW RD -WELL # 15.7:3 DESC-2476 BRONSON DR - WTP #1 VENDOR TOTAL 7721.92 C22771 07/06/93 262.10 262.10 DESC-GAS SERVICE DAMAGED W/E VENDOR TOTAL 262.10 11179 416.80 416.80 11170 327.44 327.44 07/12/93 833.60 DESC-CITY NEWSLETTER DESC-CITY NEWSLETTER 07/12/93 654.88 DESC-POSTAGE FOR NEWSLETTER DESC-POSTAGE FOR NEWSLETTER VENDOR TOTAL 1488.48 138243 07/07/93 413.75 413.75 DESC-CHAINS W/GRAB & GRAB VENDOR TOTAL 413.75 19704 26.36 19690 20.34 19691 7.25 271330 07/15/93 26.36 DESC-TABLECOVERS & BALLOONS 07/07/93 20.34 DESC-ARRANGEMENTS,TABLECOVERE 07 0 93 7.25 DESC-TABLECOVERS 07/16/93 7.72 7.72 DESC-TABLECOVERS VENDOR TOTAL 61.67 39255 07/27/9:1 2-322628 07 / 1 6 /9:3 29.18 GE 1 15 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI 0ENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122008 AMT- 29.18 DESC-WIPER & TUBULAR BLADES VENDOR TOTAL 29.18 180 PETROLANE GAS SERVICE 39256 07/27/93 776761 P 07/13/93 3702.03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-1260-000000 AMT- 3702.03 DESC-8r-502 GALLONS OF PROPANE VENDOR TOTAL 3702.03 766 PITNEY BOWES 39257 07/27/93 8407165-JY93 07/14/93 547.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-401000 AMT- 547.00 DESC-6/30 - 9/30 CHARGE VENDOR TOTAL 547.00 875 PRINTMASTER PRINTING 39258 07/27/93 19738 07/09/93 147.13 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-343000 AMT- 147.13 BESC-ID CARDS - PEDDLERS/SOLI 39258 07/27/93 19737 07/06/93 124.60 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-343000 AMT- 124.60 DESC-LETTERHEAD VENDOR TOTAL 271.73 730 RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS &* 39259 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-160210 AMT- 06/18/93 6.50 6.50 DESC-PARK USE PERMIT VENDOR TOTAL 6.50 760 RAMSEY COUNTY PTAC 39260 07/27/93 412 07/01/93 150.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-363000 AMT- 150.00 DESC-6 OFFICERS-TRG/COMM X CL VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 8ZT_)RAMSEY COUNTY TREASUR* 39261 07/27/93 C 3934 57401 07/15/93 17.61 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-303000 AMT- 17.61 DESC-DATA PROCESSING(APR, MAY 39261 07/27/93 802161 47101 03/18/93 1 56.12 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-513000 AMT- 56.12 DESC-TRAFFICLIGHT(HWY 10-WO[ VENDOR TOTAL 73.73 �080 RENT ALL MINNESOTA 39262 07/27/93 161269 07/01/93 13.79 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-401000 AMT- 13.79 BESC-SHEET ROCK SCREW GUN VENDOR TOTAL 13.79 '200 RUFF - CUT 3926307/27/93 93128 06/30/93 40.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 40.00 DESC-CUT WEEDS AT RED OAK & L VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 400 SAARION, MARY 39226407/27/93 0/27/93 26.56 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-160000 AMT- 18.44 DESC-COMMUNITY MEETING ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-380000 AMT- 8.12 DESC-MILEAGE VENDOR TOTAL 26.56 `600 ST. MARIE SHEET METAL* 39265 07/27/93 07/02/93 60.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-511000 AMT- 60.80 DESC-RAIN CAP FLASHING VENDOR TOTAL 60.00 793 MINN, STATE OF 39266 07y27/93 168451 07/27/93 30.00 ���CCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 30.00 DESC-EXEMPTION FEE ����. 'GE' 16 -C10-01 'NDOR NqVENDOR NAME ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DI NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 225 SHORT ELLIOTT & HENDR* 39267 VENDOR TOTAL 30~00 07/27/93 18339 ACCOUNTNUMBER- �8O-4120-70�0OO AMT- 14238.45 �E�C- ' � ' TF #293 -'W--'4- VENDOR TOTAL 14238.45 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160107 AMT- 1428.00 DESC-CO-SPONSORED C]M'' MUNITY [ VENDOR TOTAL 1428.00 250 S B M FIRE DEPARTMENT 39269 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4210-390000 39269 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4210-303000 07/27/93 AMT- 12977.75 07/27/93 AMT- 38.26 200 STOFFEL SEALS CORPORA* 39270 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-160000 AMT- 635 TARGET STORES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 4 CCOUNT NUMBER- 39271 07/27/93 100-4120-160301 AMT- 39271 07/27y93 250-4351-160029 AMT- '280 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC 39272 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 108-4190-114000 795 TOLL COMPANY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 07/27/93 AMT- 39273 07/27/93 100-4260-160000 AMT- .700 TRADE TOOLS, INC 39274 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 400 U S WEST ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER- CCQUNT NUMBER- 39275 100-4190-310000 100-4190-310000 100-4360-310000 730-4121-310000 100-4190-310000 100-4190-310000 100-4360-310000 100-4360-310000 100-4190-310080 39275 255-4121-310000 07/27/93 07/09/93 12977.75 DESC-DEC-FIRE PROTECTION 07/15y93 38.26 DESC-JUNE - FIRE INSPECTIONS VENDOR TOTAL 13016.01 - 0573773 07/12/93 224.00 224.00 DESC-POLICE BADGES VENDOR TOTAL 224.00 07/20y93 10.19 10.19 DESC-POPCORN & JUICE BOXES 07/12/93 14.22 14.22 DESC-WAX,DYE,WAX PAPER, CHALk VENDOR TOTAL 24.41 12164 07/08/93 60.75 60.75 DESC-RED/WHITE TAPE VENDOR TOTAL 60.75 466534 06/30/93 1.70 DESC-CHEMICALS VENDOR TOTAL 1.70 1.70 017298 07/11/93 7.72 7~72 DESC-SPANNER SCREWS & BIT VENDOR TOTAL 7.72 07y27/93 AMT- 64.86 AMT- 31.55 AMT- 20.92 AMT- 164~86 AMT- 54.25 AMT- 50~26 AMT- 20.92 AMT- 20.512 AMT- 1193.96 07/27/93 AMT- 235.26 07/27/93 1622.50 DESC-484-9155 DESC-E23-4126 DESC-780-1908 DESC-E07-1580 DESC^784-4349 B001122 DESC-784-9871 DESC-784-1305 DESC-784-1076 DESC-784-3055 07/27/93 235.26 DESC-784-9947 TIF 4GE 17 -C10-01 ND R N•VENDOR NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 3000 UNIFORM UNLIMITED 39277 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-1 60000 2 100 VARSITY PHOTOS, ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER- INC 39278 250- 4351-160026 250-4351-160030 250-4351-160033 250-4351-160034 250-4:351-160038 39278 250-4351-160026 250-4351-160034 250-4 _:51-1600_,_, 250-435 1-1600 =.0 006 V I K I NG SAFETY PRODUCT* 39279 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4:360-160000 39279 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 • ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE NMBR DATE 07/27/93 411257 VENDOR TOTAL 06/29/93 AMT- 55.27 DESC-CRUISER VENDOR TOTAL 07/27/93 AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- 07/27/93 AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- 2703 145.00 145.00 145.00 160.00 145.00 MATE INVOICE AMOUNT 1857.76 55.27 55.27 06/08/93 740.00 DESC-TEAM PICTURES DESC-TEAM PICTURES DESC-TEAM PICTURES DESC-TEAM PICTURES DESC-TEAM PICTURES 2710 & 2650 07 / 1 '2 /93 535.00 5.00 DESC-TEAM PICTURES :65.00 DESC-TEAM PICTURES 75.00 DESC-TEAM PICTURES 90.00 DESC-TEAM PICTURES VENDOR TOTAL 1275.00 DI 07/27/93 492219 H 07/14/93 40.95 AMT- 40.95 DESC-SAFETY GLASSES & EAR PLL 07/27/93 492220 N 07 / 14 /93 16.51 AMT- 16.51 DESC-EAR PLUGS VENDOR TOTAL 57.46 '000 WUORI, DIANE 39280 07/27/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4:353-160213 AMT- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-435::-160213 AMT- • 07/27/93 9.33 DESC-SUPPLIES 18.84 DESC-SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 28. 17 28.17 1633 94.33 GE 1 '-C10-02 :NDOR N•VENDOR NAME 919 WESTERN BANK ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT OCCOUNT CCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT OCCOUNT NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE • 38513 07/08/93 100-4100-010000 100-4120-010000 100-4120-020301 100-4150-010000 100-41 80-0 10000 100- 41 80-02 0000 100-4190-010000 100- 4190- O'20000 100-4200-010000 100-4200-011000 100-4200-020000 100-4230-010000 100-4240-020000 1 00 - 4260 - 0 1 0000 100-4260-011000 100-4270-010000 100-4270-011000 100-4350-010000 100-4350-020000 100-4360-010000 1 00-4360-01 1000 100-4:7460-020000 250-4351-020014 250 - 4351- O'20026 250-4351-020031 250-4351-0200.32 250-4351-020033 250-4351-020042 250-4351-020260 250-4352-020130 250-4352-020260 250-4353-020260 250-4354-020229 250-4354-020231 250-4354-020233 250-4354-020237 25 2-,- 250-4'354-020241 250-4354-020253 250-4354-020 '54 250-4354-020255 250-4354-020256 250-4354-02026E 255-4121-020000 270-4120-020000 290-4121-010000 700-4120-010000 700-4121-01 0000 700-4121-0 1 1000 AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- ACCOUNTS INVOICE 1125.00 4391 .60 280.00 4247.01 3957.28 _'20.00 1476.99 1165.35 27138.97 141.28 527.55 491.85 422.40 1178.40 121.52 2904.57 349.82 3578.40 4229.75 2666.9 150.55 2199.30 63.00 10.00 15.00 55.00 20.00 264.0E 242.10 66.00 242.11 242.11 140.00 105.00 245.00 140.00 14.00 70.00 196.00 14.00 147.00 35.00 242.10 1247.25 573.40 657.06 1883.30 2760.00 1=.12 PAYABLE PRE -PAID CHECK: REGISTE MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE DI NMBR DATE AMOUNT 07/08/9:3 DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC:-GROSS DESC-GROSS DESC-GROSS =:0795.79 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/9 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/9c 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/9'3 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/9' 7/09/93 GE' 2 C10-02 NDOR N•VENDOR NAME ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT 4OCCOUNT CCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT 41OCCOUNT NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- ;NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMEtER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 700-4121-020000 730-4120-010000 730-4121-010000 730-4121-01 1000 730-4121-020000 38514 100-4100-030000 100-4120-0:30000 100-4150-030000 100-4180-030000 100-4190-0:0000 100-4200-030000 100-4240-030000 100-4260-030000 100-4270-030000 100-4350-030000 100-4360-030000 250-4 351-030000 250 - 4.352 - 030 000 250- 4353 - 0:30000 250-4354-030000 255-4121-030000 270-4120-030000 290-4121-030000 700-4120-030000 700-4121-030000 730-4120-030000 730-4121-030000 100-4100-031000 100 - 4120- 031000 100 -4150 - 031000 100-4180-031000 100-4190-0: 31000 100-4 00-0:7:1000 100-4240-031000 100-4260-031000 100-4270-031000 100-4350-031000 100-4360-031000 250-4351-031000 250-4352-0:31000 250-4353-031000 250-4354-031000 255-4121-0:31000 270-4120-031000 290-4121-031000 700-4120-031000 700-4121-031000 730-4120-031000 730-4121-031000 AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE -PAID CHECK REGISTE MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE DI INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 1040.75 1883.30 2736.80 55"j.22 AMT- 1016.75 07 /08 /93 AMT- 17.05 AMT- 289.65 AMT- 243.02 AMT- 'S3.75 AMT- 163. 82 AMT- 226. 66 AMT- 21.42 AMT- 77.52 AMT- 177.05 AMT- 463.46 AMT- 302.65 AMT- 41.48 AMT- 19.10 AMT- 15.01 AMT- _c .53 AMT- 77.33 AMT- :35.54 AMT- 40.74 AMT- 71.22 AMT- 276.17 AMT- 71.23 AMT- 25 .94 AMT- 12.33 AMT- 67.74 AMT- 56.84 AMT- 59.36 AMT- AMT- 98. E:9 AMT- 5.01 AMT- 18.13 AMT- 41.41 AMT- 108.39 AMT- 70.79 AMT- 9.70 AMT- 4.47 AMT- 3.51 AMT- 19.55 AMT- 18.09 AMT- 8.31 AMT- 9.52 AMT- 16.66 AMT- 64.60 AMT- 16.66 AMT 60.55 DESC-GROSS - DESC-GROSS - DESC-GROSS - DESC-GROSS - DESC-GROSS - 07/08:/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/9 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/9:3 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 DESC-7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 7/09/93 - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - FICA - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE - MEDICARE GE 3 -C10-02 NDOR CHECK CHECK NcENDOR NAME - NUMBER DATE 970 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, IN* 38515 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-040000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-040000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-040000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-41 80-040000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-415,0-040000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-040000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-040000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-040000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-040000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-040000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-040000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-040000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-040000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 7 30-41'2 1-040000 020 MED I CA ACCOUNT ACCOUNT CCOUNT CCOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- 3 516 100-4120-040000 90-4121-040000 100-41 80-040000 1 00-4200-040000 100-4360-040000 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE -PAID CHECK REGISTE MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE DI INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 84831 .01 07/ty/93 AMT- 145.68 AMT- 470.32 AMT- 745.74 AMT- 443.98 AMT- 218.5: AMT- 298.30 AMT- 3542.33 AMT- 698.02 AMT- 74.58 AMT- 742.28 AMT- 298.30 AMT- 95.01 AMT- 596. 60 AMT- 395.01 AMT- 443.98 07/09/93 AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- 000 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLA* 38517 07/09/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- .100-4120-040000 AMT- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 AMT- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-040000 AMT- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-040000 AMT- 970 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, IN* 38518 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-042000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-042000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-042000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-042000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-042000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-042000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-042000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-042000 07/09/93 AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- 700 COMMERICAL LIFE INSUR* 38519 07/09/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-041000 AMT- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-041000 AMT- •CCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-041000 AMT- 07/09/93 DESC-HEALTH INS DESC-HEALTH INS DESC-HEALTH INS DESC-HEALTH INS DESC-HEALTH DESC-HEALTH DESC-HEALTH DESC-HEALTH DESC-HEALTH DESC-HEALTH DESC-HEALTH DESC-HEALTH DESC-HEALTH DESC-HEALTH DESC-HEALTH INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS 9508.65 PREM PREM PREM PREM PREM PREM PREM PREM PREM PREM PREM PREM PREM PREM PREM JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY VENDOR TOTAL 9508=; .65 07/09/9:3 187.16 DESC-HEALTH INS 140.37 DESC-HEALTH INS 233.95 DESC-HEALTH INS 374.32 DESC-HEALTH INS 298.30 DESC-HEALTH INS VENDOR TOTAL 1234.10 PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY 1234.10 07/09/93 739.00 146.90 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - JULY 293.80 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - JULY 149.15 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - JULY 149.15 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - JULY VENDOR TOTAL 739.00 07/09/93 A0.95 DESC-DENTAL 14.55 DESC-DENTAL 43.65 DESC-DENTAL 9.70 DESC-DENTAL 148.25 DESC-DENTAL 19.40 DESC-DENTAL 9.70 DESC-DENTAL 9.70 DESC-DENTAL VENDOR TOTAL 1.70 45.95 1.27 INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS 315.90 0 PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY 315.90 07/09/93 388.65 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - JULY DESC-LIFE INS PREM - JULY DESC-LIFE INS PREM - JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - COUNT NUMBER- OCCOUNT NUMBER- K]E 4 `-C10-02 �NDOR N4WENDOR ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT 'ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NAME NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- MUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- NUMBER- CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 100-41-04100O 100-4180-041000 100-4190-041000 100-4260-041000 100-4200-041000 100-4270-041000 100-4230-041000 100-4350-041000 100-4360-041000 700-4120-041000 700-4121-041000 730-4120-041000 730-4121-041000 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE -PAID CHECK REGISTE MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE DI INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMT- 4.25 AMT- 31.73 AMT- 54.65 AMT- 1.70 AMT- 121.23 AMT- 3.98 AMT- .42 AMT- 5.10 AMT- 3.40 AMT- 42.89 AMT- 4.25 AMT- 42.88 AMT- 23.25 '863 RAMSEY COUNTY RECORDE* 38521 07/08/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-2303-000901 AMT- ;120 CHILDREN'S MUSEUM 38522 07/08/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160028 AMT- ,2 MCINTYRE, ROBIN 38523 07/08/93 OCCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-160213 AMT- 1442 MIDWEST ASPHALT ACCOUNT NUMBER- CORPO* 38524 07y08/93 680-4120-703000 AMT- ,211 MCINTYRE, ROBIN 38525 07y09/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-020213 AMT- :080 CHEEPSKATE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 38526 07/09/93 250-4351-160028 AMT- ,118 GERGEN, ANN 38527 07/09/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-160301 AMT- 7900 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-035000 38529 100-4120-033000 100-4150-033000 100-4180-033000 100-4190-033000 07/09/93 m'//- 07/09/93 r,n/- AMT- ,,n/AMT- - 20697 06/18y93 111.24 DESC-MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL DESC-LIFE DESC-LIFE DESC-LIFE DESC-LIFE DESC-LIFE DESC-LIFE DESC-LIFE DESC-LIFE DESC-LIFE DESC-LIFE DESC-LIFE DESC-LIFE DESC-LIFE VENDOR TOTAL INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM - JULY PREM -.JULY PREM - JULY -PREM - JULY 388.65 07/08/93 19.50 19.50 DESC-RECORDING FEE VENDOR TOTAL 19.50 07/08/93 20.00 20.00 DESC-PRODUCTION 7/9/93 VENDOR TOTAL 20.00 07/08/93 14.90 14.90 DESC-DROP SHEET VENDOR TOTAL 14.90 111.24 111.24 07/09/93 200~00 200.00 DESC-SET DESIGN FOR FANTASTIC VENDOR TOTAL 200.00 07/09y93 112.00 112.00 DESC-SKATING PARTY VENDOR TOTAL 112.00 07y09/93 16.95 16.95 DESC-5' WOOD GARDEN STAKE VENDOR TOTAL 16.95 42.50 196.75 1S5.48 177.28 66.17 07/09/93 42.50 DESC-DEFINED CONTRIBUTIONS 07/09/93 4909.60 DESC-PERA - PENSIONS DESC-PERA - PENSIONS DESC-PERA - PENSIONS DESC-PERA - PENSIONS )GE 5 `-C1O-02 'NDOR NJOVENDOR NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 100-4200-033000 100-4200-034000 100-4230-034000 100-4240-033000 100-4260-033000 100-4270-033000 100-4350-033000 100-4360-033000 250-4351-033000 250-4352-033000 250-4353-033000 250-4354-033000 270-4120-033000 290-4121-033000 700-4120-032000 700-4120-033000 700-4121-033000 730-4120-032000 730-4120-033000 730-4121-033000 AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- i210 MN WASTEWATER OPERATO* 36531 07/13/93 AlIkACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-363000 AMT- �00 TREAT ME SWEET ACCOUNT WUMBER- `100 RUCKER, DON ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER - ACCOUNT NUMBER- 919 WESTERN BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER- 38532 07/14y93 100-4120-160301 AMT- 38534 700-4121-122000 100-4260-122000 730-4121-122000 100-4360-160000 07/15y93 AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- 38535 07/15/93 290-4121-396000 AMT- �650 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN 38536 07y15/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-160213 AMT- 38537 07/15/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-160213 AMT- ::100 SUBWAY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 38538 07/15/93 100-4100-303000 AMT- ACC8UNTS PAYABLE PRE -PAID CHECK REGISTE MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE DI INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 126.53 DESC-PERA 2967.07 DESC-PERA 59.02 DESC-PERA 18.92 DESC-PERA 58.24 DESC-PERA 145.80 DESC-PERA 157.06 DESC-PERA 110.42 DESC-PERA 22.67 DESC-PERA 13.81 DESC-PERA 10.85 DESC-PERA 10.83 DESC-PERA 19.01 DESC-PERA 29.44 DESC-PERA 53.69 DESC-PERA 61.16 DESC-PERA 160.08 DESC-PERA 53.70 DESC-PERA 61.14 DESC-PERA 144.48 DESC-PERA - VENDOR TOTAL - PENSIONS - PENSIONS - PENSIONS - PENSIONS PENSIONS - PENSIONS - PENSIONS - PENSIONS - PENSIONS - PENSIONS - PENSIONS - PENSIONS - PENSIONS - PENSIONS - PENSIONS - PENSIONS - PENSIONS - PENSIONS ~ PENSIONS PENSIONS 4952.10 07/13y93 270.00 270.00 DESC-CONF-MORTENSON,DECHEINE, VENDOR TOTAL 270.00 07/14/93 89.14 89.14 DESC-CANDY FOR FESTIVAL IN TF VENDOR TOTAL 85,1.14 100.00 75.00 50.00 25.00 07y15/93 250.00 DESC-PAINT SEAL TRUCK DESC-PAINT SEAL TRUCK DESC-PAINT SEAL TRUCK DESC-PAINT SEAL TRUCK VENDOR TOTAL 250.00 O7/15/93 200.00 DESC-AWARDS VENDOR TOTAL 200.00 07y15/93 200.00 200.00 DE8C-DEPOSIT-HELIUM TANK (FE. 07/15/93 39.43 '39~43 DESC-HELIUM FOR MVCT BALLOON - VENDOR TOTAL 239.43 07/15/93 32.04 32.04 DESC-GOLF COURSE MEETING VENDOR TOTAL 32.04 GE 6 '-C10-02 .ND CHECK CHECK N ENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE )400 PADELFORD PACKET BOAT* 38539 07/16/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160130 AMT- ;180 SHAKOPEE, CITY OF 38540 07/16/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160028 AMT- .755 ; BRAGER , DONALD 38541 07/16/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-363000 AMT- ''200 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REV* 38542 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-3821-000000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-3821-000000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-112000 ACCOUNT NUMBER 100-4190-703000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-703000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-703000 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4:350-703000 '2•ANCHORAGE CCOUNT NUMBER- '214 DINSMORE, JEFF ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100 SUBWAY ACCOUNT NUMBER- ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE -PAID CHECK REGISTE MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE DI INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 07/19/00 AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- AMT- 38543 07/19/93 100-4100-303000 AMT- 36544 O7/19/93 250-4 _,5 3-1 60.: 03 AMT- 38545 07/19/93 100-4100-303000 AMT- 995 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 38546 07/20/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-363000 AMT- ': 43 GARDEN INN ACCOUNT NUMBER- 7244 SIMMONS, DAVID ACCOUNT NUMBER- "245 1 OCH , SANDRA �CCOUNT - NUMBER- 38547 07/21/93 100-4260-36.3000 AMT- 38548 O7/21/93 250-4353-020213 AMT- 388549 07/21/93 250-4353-02021 _, AMT- 07/16/93 231.00 231.00 DESC-CRUISE DATE 7/27/93 VENDOR TOTAL 231.00 07/16/93 178.00 178.00 DESC-SWIMMING POOL & WATERSLI VENDOR TOTAL 178.00 07/16/93 140.00 140.00 DESC-MILEAGE ADVANCE (500 @ . 2 VENDOR TOTAL 140.00 07/19/93 543.31 .71 DESC-JUNE SALES TAX 63.86 DESC-JUNE SALES TAX 37.25 DESC-JUNE USE TAX - COPY SALE /-.4.63 DESC-JUNE USE TAX - BOOK PUBL 100.10 DESC-JUNE USE TAX - D-C DRIVE 62.86 DESC-JUNE USE TAX - HENRY AD' 213.85 DESC-JUNE USE TAX - SIERRA DI VENDOR TOTAL 543.31 07/19/93 100.00 100.00 DESC-LUNCH-NEU,LIN!-E,ORDUNO,C VENDOR TOTAL 100.00 07/19/93 650.00 650.00 DESC-FESTIVAL IN THE PARK - B VENDOR TOTAL 650.00 07/19/93 32.04 32.04 DESC-BUDGET WORE: SESSION VENDOR TOTAL 7:2.04 07/20/93 9.25 9.25 DESC-RETURN SAFETY TAPES VENDOR TOTAL 9.25 07/21/93 82.13 DESC-MANKATO GARB VENDOR TOTAL 82.13 SEMINAR -PIT 8,_ .13 07/21/93 1200.00 1200.00 DESC-DIRECTOR/MUSIC DIRECTOR VENDOR TOTAL 12O0.O0 07/21/93 300.00 300.00 DESC-PIANIST VENDOR TOTAL 300.O0 ^ iGE 7 ^-C10-02 N*ENDOR NAME I25 TOMCZYK, CURT ACCOUNT NUMBER - CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 38550 07/21/93 250-4353-020213 AMT- 109 JOHNSON, MAREN KAY 38551 07/21/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 2250-4.353-160213 AMT- ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE -PAID CHECK REGISTE MOUNDS VIEW INVOICE INVOICE DI INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT `211 MCINTYRE, ROBIN ' 38552 07/21/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-020213 AMT- '200 MOR8AN, LYNNETTE 38553 07/21/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-303000 AMT- /400 PADELFORD PACKET BOAT* 38554 07/21/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160130 AMT- 0 0 07/21/93 150.00 150.00 DESC-COSTUME DESIGNER VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 07/21/93 100.00 100.00 DESC-STAGE MANAGER VENDOR TOTAL 1()0.00 07/21/93 200.00 200.00 DESC-SET DESIGN & BUILDING VENDOR TOTAL 200.00 07/21/93 81.84 81.84 DESC-MISC GROCERIES VENDOR TOTAL 81.84 07/21/93 32.00 32.00 DESC-CRUISE 7y27y93 VENDOR TOTAL 32.00 GRAND TOTAL 107574.18 REQTJEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 5TAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DA'TE JULY 26, 1993 Agenda Section: 5.G. Report Number: 93-561C Report Date: 7-21-93 Council Action: O Special Order of Business O Public Hearings xE Consent Agenda O Council Business Item Description: Purchase of air compressor Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement shee TIVIRWARY; necessary.) As mentioned at the July 19th work session, the air compressor in Public Works is in need of earlier replacement then anticipated. .Staff has received bids from: American Compressor, Inc. $1,839.60 Kruge-Air $1,907.40 Staff recommends the purchase of a new air compressor from American Compressor, Inc.. for the bid price of $1,839.60 plus 6.5% sales tax of $119.57, for a total of $1,959.17. Michael Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor RECOMMENDATION: • Award purchase of air compressor to American Compressor, Inc. for the bid price of $1,959.17 (tax included) to be funded from account no. 100-4260-703. Funds to be transfered from the contingency account, 100-4500-910, to 100-4260-703. nior MY REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ,STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE JJLY 26 . 1993 Agenda Section: 8.a. 7 : 0 5in Report Number. 93-562C Report Date: 7-21-93 Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business ..x12 Public Hearings 0 Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Request for Conditional Use Permit, (Minor Auto Repair) , 2806 Highway 10, Ron Schmidt, Planning Case No. 365-93 Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; Ron Schmidt, representing Amoco Oil Company, has made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a minor auto repair and service station at 2806 Highway 10. Chapter 40.18 Subdivision D (3) of the Mounds View Municipal Code allows for an operation of this type within a B-3 district with the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. Consideration of this request is based on guidelines set forth in the aforementioned Chapter 40.18 and, Chapter 40.25 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. A copy of those guidelines have been provided for your review. The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal and will be taking formal action on the request at their July 21 meeting. The results of that meeting will be forwarded to the Council Monday evening. Staff's review of the request indicates that all applicable zoning considerations have beenadequately addressed by the applicant. Following the Planning Commission meeting, Staff will prepare the appropriate resolution and forward it to the City Council for consideration. All other materials received as part of the request have been provided for your review. l / ` Paul Harrington, ity Planner RECOMMENDATION:- Adopt appropriate resolution (to be provided Monday evening by Staff.) RESOLUTION NO. 4394 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY RON SCHMIDT, 2806 HIGHWAY 10, PLANNING CASE NO. 365-93 WHEREAS, Ron Schmidt has requested City approval to operate a minor auto repair facility at 2806 Highway 10; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Municipal Code allows minor auto repair facilities in a B-3, Highway Commercial District; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: a) Site plan dated June 4, 1993 b) Letter of request dated May 28, 1993 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal and recommended approval in Resolution No. 364-93. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. A storm water control plan and landscape plan shall be submitted by the applicant and approved by the appropriate City Staff. 2. There shall be no outside loudspeakers at this facility. 3. Only minor repairs and maintenance will be allowed on site between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday and between 11:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Sunday. 4. No major engine overhauls, transmission replacement, or body work shall be allowed on the site. 40.18 i. Vehicular access points shall be limited, shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. J. All signing and informational or visual communi- cation devices shall be in compliance with the Mounds View Sign Code (Chapter 39). k. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. 1. The provisions of Section 40.25, Subd. A (5) of this Code are considered and satisfactorily met. (3) Motor fuel station, auto repair -minor and tire battery stores and service provided that: a. Regardless of whether the dispensing, sales or offering for sale of motor fuels and/or oil is. incidental to the conduct of the use or business, the standards and requirements imposed by this Code for motor fuel stations shall apply. These standards and requirements are, however, in addition to other requirements which are imposed. for other uses of the property. b. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not•be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. c. The entire site other than that taken up by a building, structure or plantings shall be surfaced with a material to control dust, drainage and erosion which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. d. A minimum lot area of twenty-two thousand five hundred•(22,500) square feet and minimum lot dimensions of one hundred fifty (150) feet by one hundred thirty (130) feet be provided. e. A drainage system subject tothe approval of the City Engineer shall be installed. f. A curb not less than six (6) inches above grade shall separate the public sidewalk from motor vehicle service areas. 40.1.8 g. The lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct source of light visible from adjacent land in residential use or from tie public right-of-way and shall be in compliance with Section 40.04, Subd. I of this Code. _ h. Wherever fuel pumps are to •be installed; pump islands shall be installed. i. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than ten (10) feet shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with Section 40.04, Subd. H of this Code. j- Each light standard island and all islands in the parking lot shall be landscaped or covered. k. Parking or car magazine storage space shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with Section 40.04, Subd. H of this Code. 1. Vehicular access points shall create a.minimum of conflict with through traffic movement, shall comply with Section 40.07 of this Code and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. m. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be minimized and shall be in compliance with the Mounds View Sign Code. (Chapter 39). n. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. o. No outside storage except as allowed in compliance with Section 40.18, Subd. D(4) of this Code shall exist. P• q• No outside sale or service except as allowed in compliance with Section 40.18, Subd. D(5) of this Code shall exist. Sale of products other than those specifically mentioned in this Subdivision shall be subject to the conditional use permit. r. All conditions pertaining toa specific site are subject to change when the City Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, finds that, the general welfare and public betterment can be served as well or better by modifying the conditions. 40.18 s. The provisions of Section 40.25, Subd. A(5) of this Code are considered and satisfactorily met. (4) Open and outdoor storage as an accessory use provided that: a. The area is fenced and screened from view of neighboring uses or if abutting an "R" District in compliance with Section 40.04, Subd. H of this Code. b. Storage is screened from view from the public right-of-way in compliance with Section 40.04, Subd. H of this Code. c. Storage area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. d. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right-of-way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Section 40.04, Subd. I of this Code. e. The open and outdoor storage does not take up parking space as required for conformity to this Code. f. The provisions of Section 40.25, Subd. A(5) of this Code are considered and satisfactorily met. (5) Open or outdoor service, sale and rental as a principal or accessory use and including sales in, or from motorized vehicles, trailers or wagons provided that: a. Outside services, sales and equipment rental connected with the principal use is limited to thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area of the principal use. b. Outside sales areas are fenced or screened from view of neighboring residential uses or an abutting "R" District in compliance with Section 40.04, Subd. H of this Code. c. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right-of-way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Section 40.04, Subd. I of. this Code. d. Sales area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. 40.24 (3) Final Plat Stacie. After approval of a general concept plan for the PUD and approval of a develop- ment stage plan for a section of the proposed PUD the applicant will submit the following material for review by City staff prior to issuance of a building or other permits: a. A detailed landscaping plan. b. Proof of recording any easements and restrictive covenants prior to the sale of any land or dwelling unit within the PUD and of the establish- ment and activation of any entity that is to be responsible for the management and maintenance of any public or common open space or service facility. c. All certificates, seals and signatures required for the dedication of land and recordation of documents. d. Final architectural working drawings of all structures. e. Final engineering plans and specifications for streets, utilities and other public improvements, together with a Community/Developer Agreement for the installation of such improvements and finan- cial guarantees for the completion of such improvements. f. Any other plan, agreements, or specifications necessary for the City staff to review the proposed construction. 40.25 ADMINISTRATION - AMENDMENTS TO THIS CODE, OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND ISSUANCE OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS Subd. A Procedure. (1) Request for amendments of this Code, the official zoning map or conditional use permits, as provided within this Code, shall be filed with the City Clerk - Administrator on an official application form. Such application shall also be accompanied by ten (10) copies of detailed written and graphic materials fully explaining the proposed change, development or use. The City -Clerk -Administrator shall refer said application, along with all related information, to the Planning Commission for consideration and a report and recommendation to the City Council. 40.25 (2) The Planning Commission shall consider the request at its next regular meeting unless the filing date falls within fifteen (15) days of said meeting, in which case the request would be placed on the agenda and considered at the regular meeting following the next regular meeting. The City Clerk -Administrator shall refer said application along with all related information to the City Planning Commission at least ten (10) days prior to the regular meeting. (3) The applicant or a representative thereof shall appear before the Planning Commission in order to answer questions concerning the proposed amendment or conditional use. (4) The amendment or conditional use application shall be referred to the City staff for a report and recom- mendation to be presented to the Commission. A preliminary draft to the City staff's report and recommendations shall be given to the City Planning Commission at least ten (10) days prior to the meeting at which said report and recommendations are .to be presented. The final report and recommenda- tions of the City staff is to be entered in and made part of the permanent written record of the Planning Commission meeting. (5) The Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment or condi- tional use. Its judgement shall be based upon (but not limited to) the following factors: a. Relationship to municipal comprehensive plan. b. The geographical area involved. c. Whether such use will tend to or actually depre- ciate the area in which it is proposed. d. The character of the surrounding area. e. The demonstrated need for such use. (6) The Planning Commission and City staff shall have the authority to request additional information from the applicant concerning operational factors or to retain expert testimony with the consent and at the expense of the applicant concerning operational factors, said information to be declared necessary to establish performance conditions in relation to all pertinent sections of this Code. (7) The Planning Commission shall make a finding of fact and recommend such actions or conditions relating to the request as -they deem necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of the Code. Such recommendation shall be in writing and accompanied by the report and recommendation of the City staff. 40.25 (8) The City Council shall not grant a conditional use permit until they have received a report and recommendation from the Planning Commission and the City staff or until sixty (60) days after the. first regular Planning Commission meeting at which the request was considered. (9) Upon receiving the report and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the City staff, the City Council shall place the report and recommendation on the agenda for the next regular meeting. Such reports and recommendations shall be entered in and made part of the permanent written record of the City Council meeting. (10) Upon receiving the report and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the City staff, the City Council shall hold a public hearing and shall make a recorded finding of fact and shall impose any conditions it considers necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare. (11) Amendments of this Code, the official zoning map or a conditional use permit shall require passage by a four -fifths (4/5) vote of the full City Council. (12) The City Clerk -Administrator shall notify the applicant of the Council's decision in writing. Subd. B Amendments - Initiation. The City Council or Planning Commission may upon their own motion, initiate a request to amend this Code or the official zoning map. Any person, owning real estate within the City may initiate a request to amend this Code or the official zoning map as it affects the real estate owned by said person. Subd. C Conditional Use Permit. (1) Purpose. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to provide the City of Mounds View with a reasonable degree of discretion in determining the suitability of certain designated uses upon the general welfare, public health and safety. (2) Criteria for Granting Conditional Use Permits. In granting a conditional use permit, the City Council shall consider the advise and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan and upon the health, safety and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. Among other things, the City Council shall make the following findings where applicable: 40.25 a. The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. b. The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and there will be no deterrance to development of vacant land. c. The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent residential properties. d. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. e. The use is consistant with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends• to locate the proposed use. f. The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. g• The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. h. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be provided. (3) Additional Conditions. In permitting a new conditional use or the alteration of an existing conditional use, the City Council may impose, in addition to these standards and requirements expressly specified by this Code, additional conditions which the City Council considers necessary to protect the best interest ofthesurrounding area or the community as a whole. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: a. Increasing the required lot size or yard dimension. b. Limiting the height, size, or location of buildings. c. Controlling the location and number of vehicle access points. 40.25 d. Increasing the street width. e. Increasing the number of required off-street parking spaces. f. Limiting the number, size, location or lighting of signs. g• Requiring diking, fencing, screening, landscaping or other facilities to protect adjacent and nearby property. h. Designating sites for open space. The Zoning Administrator shall maintain a record of all conditional use permits issued including infor- mation on the use, location, and conditions imposed by the City Council; time limits, review dates and such other information as may be appropriate. (4) Reconsideration. Whenever an application for a ' conditional use permit has been considered and denied by the City Council, a similar application'for a conditional use permit affecting substantially the same property shall not be considered again by the Planning Commission or City Council for at least six (6) months from the date of its denial; and a subse- quent application affecting substantially the same property shall likewise not be considered again by the Planning Commission or City Council for an additional six (6) months from the date of the second denial unless a decision to reconsider such matter is made by not less than four -fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council. (5) Lapse of Conditional Use Permit by Non -Use. Whenever within one (1) year after granting a conditional use permit the work as permitted by the permit shall not have been completed, then such permit shall become null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the City Council. Such extension shall be requested in writing and filed with the City Clerk -Administrator at least thirty (30) days before the expiration of the original conditional use permit. There shall be no charge for the filing of such petition. The request for extension shall state facts showing a good faith attempt to complete the work permitted in the conditional use permit. Such petition shall be presented to the Planning Commission for a recommendation and to the City Council for a decision. 40.25 (6) Performance Bond. a. Upon approval of a conditional use permit the City shall be provided with a surety bond, cash escrow, certificate of deposit, securities, or cash deposit prior to the issuing of building permits. or initiation of work on the proposed improvements or development. Said security shall guarantee conformance and compliance with the conditions of the conditional use permit and the Code of the City. b. The security shall be in the amount of the City Engineer's or City Building Inspector's estimated costs of labor and materials for the proposed improvements or development. Said project can be handled in stages upon the discretion of the City Engineer and Building Inspector. c." The City shall hold the security until completion of the proposed improvements or development and a certificte of occupancy indicating compliance with the conditional use permit and Codes of the City has been issued by the City Building Inspector. d. Failure to comply with the conditions of the conditional use permit and/or the Codes of the City shall result in forfeiture of the security. 40.26 ADMINISTRATION - VARIANCES AND APPEALS Subd. A Composition. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall consist of all members of the Planning Commission. All members shall serve without compensation. Subd. B Organization, Meeting. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may elect a chairman from among its appointed members for a term of one (1) year; and the Board may create and fill such other offices as it may determine. The Board shall meet by order of its Chairman, after notice, whenever an appeal has been properly presented to it. A two-thirds (2/3) vote of a properly convened Board meeting shall be required to grant the relief sought in the appeal. Subd. C All written reports and recommendations to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals from the City staff shall be entered in and made part of the permanent written record of the Board's meeting. Purpose of Public Hearing To present, to the people of Mounds View, the specific financing plan for surface water management: A Surface Water Management Utility. • What Is A Surface Water Management Utility • A utility is a methods of financing water quantity and quality improvements consistent with the City's Surface Water Mangement Plan • Similar to sanitary sewer and water utilities, fees are based on contribution rather than property values - "User fee - based" • Fees are related to the amount of rainfall that drains away or runs off land • A utility provides a continuous source of revenue for surface water management without competing with the general fund • Eliminates the "budget busters" with an approach to management in that projects and funding is anticipated and planned rather than reacting to an emergency situation that can "bust the budget" and have a roller cost effect on property taxes. Why Does Mounds View Have to Prepare a Plan? This is a frequent question asked when the issue of water management is raised. A good response to this question is: 1. Communities recognize the value in sound planning. Local surface water management planning takes a comprehensive look at water -related issues, allowing you to react to potential problems before they develop. 2. A local plan allows you to be in control of all water -related issues instead of a watershed district. Decisions can be made with your best interests in mind. 3. Local plans satisfy the requirements of State law related to water management. Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act The Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act (State Statutes 473.875 to473.883) became law in 1982. The Act responds to flooding and water quality problems in the seven- county Metropolitan area. In the law, the Legislature indicates that prevention of water problems through sound planning and management is better public policy than allowing water problems to develop. The law requires that storm water management plans be prepared and implemented throughout the Metropolitan area. Management of a body of water or watercourse requires control of the contributing drainage area. The law requires, as a first step, preparation of a water management plan for each watershed unit in the Metropolitan area. The watershed districts and watershed management organizations were charged with preparing and implementing these plans. After a watershed plan has been approved by the Board of Water and Soil Resources, each municipality within that watershed is required to prepare a local water plan to bring its water management program into conformance with the watershed plan. The watershed management organization must approve the local plan within a 60-day period before it can be adopted by the local unit. Communities have 120 days to adopt the local plan. The State's role under the law is limited to reviewing the watershed boundaries and ensuring the watershed plans meet the requirements of the law. Neither the State agencies nor the Metropolitan Council are given an oversight role in watershed or local plan implementation. Achieving the law's purposes depends on local government officials recognizing responsibilities and accepting the necessary leadership role. Local Planning Local plans must address the water quality and the water quantity requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) plan. The general requirements of the law, in the degree of detail specified in the RCWD plan, include the following: 1. Describe existing and proposed physical environment and land use; 2. Define drainage areas, drainage paths, volumes and rates of runoff, and drainage areas and elevations of storage basins; Define water quantity and quality protection measures; 3. Identify regulated areas; 4. Develop an implementation program including official controls and a capital improvement program. 5. Develop an implementation program including official controls and a capital improvement program. The requirements for Mounds View are not site -specific. The City is, however, required to demonstrate that everything practical is being done to control runoff, maintain and improve water quality and manage wetlands. The current plan is much more cost-effective than the $4.5 million storm sewer improvement proposed in the late 70's. The benefits associated with surface water management include the following elements: • Flood control: • Improved lake water quality • Wetland protection • Erosion and sediment control • Enhancement of recreational opportunities • Drainage system maintenance • Community education Surface Water Management Planning The Mounds View City Council authorized the preparation of their Local Water Management Plan in May 1989. The plan has been prepared in accordance with State law and the Rice Creek Watershed District. The plan satisfies the District's requirements while meeting the specific needs of the City. On February 12, 1990, the plan was approved by Council for distribution to the Rice Creek Watershed District. When District approval is given, the plan will be adopted. The management programs recommended in the report will then be implemented. • • INPUT DIRECTION PREPARATION RESULT CITY OFFICIALS I CITY STAFF CITY RESIDENTS ADJACENT COMMUNITIES ONR / C.O.E. COUNTY/SWCO. INFORMATION COLLECTION 7 DEFINE GOALS 3e POLICIES WA i cR QUALITY I MANAGEMENT MAPPING 3. !WATER QUANTITY i IMPLEMENTATION 111 I MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION I PLAN FINANCING PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS CITY STANDARDS FINANCING METHODS I PRIORITIZING IMPROVEMENTS REGULATIONS It PERMITTING CODES de ORDINANCES DEVELOPER GUIDANCE PLAN AMENDMENTS The Plan Development Process involved a great deal of agency and public input. Working with the City staff, City Council, the Environmental Quality Committee, Ramsey County and with materials available from numerous agencies, the Surface Water Management Plan was developed. The plan utili7es the best state-of-the-art information, relying on the City for implementation. • April 5,1989 • May 2,1989 • May 16,1989 • June 15,1989 • August 24,1989 • September 19,1989 • October 17,1989 • December 15,1989 • January 16,1990 • January 23,1990 • February 12, 1990 January 7, 1992 February 10, 1992 Predesign meeting Environmental Quality Task Force (EQTF) Meeting EQTF Meeting Project Status Meeting Project Status Meeting EQTF Meeting Project Status Meeting Project Status Meeting Present plan to Council (Agenda Session) Final Project Status Meeting Council approves final draft plan for submittal to Rice Creek Watershed District Rice Creek Watershed District Approved Plan Council Approved Plan Concept PLAN IMPLEMENTATION DISCUSSIONS: April 6, 1992 March 1, 1993 April 14, 1993 May 3, 1993 Council Work Session JUNE 21, 1993 PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL Council Work Session MEETING ON UTILITY Council Work Session Council.Work Session MAJOR COMPONENTS OF THE PLAN • Goals and Policies • Development Guidelines • Engineering and Planning Guidelines • Definition of the Hydrologic System • Management Strategy • Water Quality Issues • Physical Environment of the City • Administration Requirement for Plan Implementation (Plan Amendments and Capital Improvements Program) • • • • • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM • Required by Law to be Part of the Plan (Minnesota Statute 103B.235, subdivision 1C, item 6) • Mounds View Plan Identified No Large Projects in the Next 5 Years • Mounds View Plan Identified Several Large Future Projects That May be or may not be Done (requires citizen input before any construction can begin) • In Spring of 1993 City Council Developed a Project Plan to Consider Infrastructure Repair, Implementation of the Capital Improvements Identified in the LWMP, and to Fund Future Projects not in the Identified in the LWMP. PROJECT PLAN 5 year plan based on using the existing Storm Water Management (SWM) fund for projects The Project Plan levels out a potentially peak and valley process that would occur if projects were funded only as crises arise.. SWM created in the 1980's and funded by specific development projects fees (i.e.: Business Park, Sysco) Assumption if development of the Project Plan: • After 5 years the Storm Water Management would have a balance of no less than $100,000 • General maintenance and administration related to water resources would be funded from the Storm Water Management • $450,000 could be spent on one large project after 5 years or several small projects during the 5 year period • The plan is reviewed annually to determine if funding income is meeting or exceeding expenses Project Plan assumes the city will have money in the bank collecting interest verses having to borrow money and paying out interest to fund large improvement projects • • EXAMPLES OF PROJECTS THAT WOULD BE FUNDED IN THE 5 YEAR PLAN • Cleaning and maintenance of wetlands and their outlets • Curb and gutter, storm sewer and catch basin costs associated with street improvement projects • Maintenance and repair of the existing infrastructure • Removal of sediment accumulation in existing wetlands and sedimentation ponds Regular maintenance strategy such as street sweeping, catch basin cleaning, and inspection of the drainage system • Ditch cleaning and repair • Administration related to water resources issued in the city • Feasibility studies for drainage improvements • Drainage system improvement projects There are many steps during the Plan Process for Public Input: • During the Approval Process of a Specific Project • Annual Budget Cycle • Plan Amendments Project Path LWMP Identified Project ................................ Resident;I:nput C.ifyStaf and:z<`::::::: Resident Input:;_ Council Orders Feasibility Study ublic Hearin and/or Information Meeting Council Orders Plans & Specifications Plans and Specifications Prepared Publib Hearing:,, `and/or:><>':> formatiotMeetin Council Orders Project Resident Identified Project • • • CITY ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES The City responsibilities include, but are not limited to the following: • Land use regulation • Sediment and erosion control • Permits (expansion of current program to cover drainage and erosion control) • Capital Improvements (non -watershed projects) • Conveyance system maintenance • Participation and cooperation with the programs of the RCWD • Local plan review and amendments • Wetland alteration - joint responsibility with DNR and Corps of Engineers • Individual septic systems • Ordinance review and amendment • Comprehensive plan update(s) • Zoning map revision(s) • Hydrologic model update with land use/zoning changes • Flood insurance study amendments Additional Administrative Costs: • 1/4 cost of 1 maintenance worker (under utility option) Under property tax option, it would be 1/3 of the cost of 1 maintenance worker paid by General Fund • Billing and processing (under utility option) • Engineering services • Operational expenses How Will the Property Owner Pay? • A quarterly fee will be charged to all developed parcels within the City. • The fee is based on how much water is contributed to the system. • The fee will appear quarterly on property owner's water and sewer bill. • EXAMPLE OF SURFACE WATER UTILITY BILLING ON CITY'S QUARTERLY UTILITY BILL • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW, MN 55112-1499 (612) 784-3065 ACCOUNT NO.= xsSERVICE FROM 04/01 /93 :SERVICE TO 06/30/93 BILUNG DATE READING PRESENT`:' 752 PREVIOUS ':- 7:_ 6 USAGE SERVICE:.; AMOUNT 16. PREV. BILL FAY RECEIVELI WR 1 WATER SR1 SEWER LR1 LIGHT MNC MNCHG SUR. WTR. UTILITY SALES TAX AO. 14 At . 1 A 17.60 47,.cy0 1.43 3.99 PAY THIS AMOUNT PAY THIS AMOUNT SERVICE LOCATION — PLEASE RETAIN THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS — YEARLY CHECK OF METERS BEGINS SEPT 17TH ANY COMMENTS ON THE NEW STATEMENTS? DATE DUE AFTER ( ):_i /31 /9•3 45.66 7'2.� W _ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW, MN 55112-1499 (612) 784-3055 CAR—RT SORT**CR1209 0 S "— MOUNDS VI MN 55112 1. 0 4 • ACCOUNT NO. '. DATE DUE 0 / =;1 /93 AMOUNT DUE` 65.66 PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION WITH PAYMENT • • The Utility or user charge places costs on contributors of runoff and water quality impacts, on a proportional basis. All properties pay, including churches, schools and government parcels. General Taxes Utility Funding 4C 4C Programs To Be Funded By Utility Wetland enhancement and maintenance Water quality modeling and monitoring Street sweeping Water management ordinance implementation and enforcement Detention basin maintenance and construction; storm sewer extensions Drainage system maintenance and reconstruction Removal of sediment from ponds and wetlands Address localized drainage problems Ditch and culvert maintenace • TABLE 2. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY SPREADSHEET CITY: MOUNDS VIEW Z N CO O CD v 0) CO O r c) T u7 00 69 69 N_ O CD w z< aZZQ cn ww= O z>CC >W Q WLLI Cn CC O 7- r- O U r J w R ANN REVISED 6/18/93 RJK YEARLY COST W w > F- 1 U) a w CC CC O U U. a CC -I w= 00 _ to CD CD Q CO 0 CO O) tf) c c to c- A O W O O) 0) cO 0' c O O c7 Cr") N N r-- N r- O O v tf) IC) CD in C:3 N CD N Z 69 69 ER CA 69 CA CR CA 0 rn t(7 aaQaQa<<< vZZZZZZZZZ UARTERLY COSTS 0) o 0) cc J 0-C1) W U C4 6aaaaaaaaa ZZZZZZZZZ c)r�oto0CI) COcCr Cr) Tr CD CD M CO C9 O O N a N N N M C bi M Hi 69 CA CR 69 Ei969 (fi z J 0 r N N N �- M Er,,, 69 69 69 69 Cfl CA cO D) CO LO N c tf) r N CT) c0 C7 CO iO N r- Chi 64 N N cO 0 CO N O CO CO CO CO CD CO O) O O CO N N N c N tD In N M M e o° o° o o° o e o° o° o° I o In O) O co c7 co co M N v 0 II CO F- O Z Q) N O t` ^ CO C^ N O M 0 O Z O _ ° W CC CL a U Cr) W I z -r cc Z r cu _Z IL Z CC N CL r- N O N c O CD CO N CO.- 0 r•-• co N r- .a ID 0) CO tr)^ c0 Tr- N CD v 0 v cD r� c O 11) CO t` CO .- CO • 0 C) C"3 6) ib N Q) N O CC) CD ei M 117 N 0) N O O t` r` c N- c CO 0) M co cods CT N O M 0 c 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 CC T J U O < J = O O c� OLw; °d CC N CL. 0 = CC f- M C Il) � Cr L.. D U I- a i _ _ = CC CO = 0 Q. Q. cn cr) ''..� ; FOR SINGLE FAMILY NCHES) DIVIDED BY RUNOFF (INCHES J J a a Z I- a O w J W I- O Z Q _ Cn W IlLu J CC z D J W O u Z W C. Z CC W Cn Q Z J - C CT) a O L } a LL W O J - ow2 _ Q_) U W < WCC I- - W 0 J U Z 111 v _ m LL CL= CC Cnw W Cnocrui Cn U al CZ!J CL Q WO N U CCJO CC J W O a Cn co U- cc W LL 1_ 80 MOON O < ~=cn z OWw Ouj I- D CC U 0_ U O O rz , CCJ (I)J W Cn J H" LU. N CL CC> W CC CC W COCC W W CC 0 W CC0J��UI-UD°u U Q a a C.)Q a Z= a===o LL W W W w W fle F- WCT) 0OO-0Ocn O CC 1- O U= l- U Q Q • 1.. cn tel 0 4-4 Icek 0 0 T.3 .,t• 0 •••. rs. r-- c; ? .—. I.. SO. Nr1 crl r-. 0 0 00 0 00 • cn Q't ''''A_) (-4 (...1 . • 0 \0 0 11144 0 p ., ?I? .-.4 C`. 0A (=).• (S cik '0 c,1 00 .cior 4,3* 0 vi, r43; .41:i' 0 0 0, 0 o0 tn.. ru C) -r2A. 4.4 r"-s cri vi o0 c4 Ql ....Act © cd 0 0 .i. cA .... gi 4 0 0 0 0 to al '. 2 '.,,, t P-4 0 Arl 1 44 4.) cti 04 .04 ad ..17 ..- al •.- p., ,.... .?" 4.0 0 1.4 v-71 cc V6 rl o tt 4 'a ca 'r4 cd ,A A, a) 0 7'k C'*4 2 ... ... r"- cn t".. ,...4 •.0 0, .• 1. - ...^4 ad ... . ail ,... Ns 0 ,... 0 0 VI 0 0.4 0 CA 410 .1:1 0 t) Ye tr4 fel°4 0041 P.4 .C1) 4:13Y 4 t'll* 0 9 7.0 OD ON '?-' 0 .-, -4,' •S' * .... 0 0 s s o) '' z•-• Or-z- el '.1" a) ot) 0‘. 0‘. r*A bo)• '," .... .«.. •-. .45-, ,-4 PA 04) 0 , N. 0 --d• S 'A " ca 0 r— SI, •1.1 t 0•4 f;4,4 0 ...,0tll r.-4 't.) .... .., 0 , Is 0 ti) ..: .-0 0 ... 4 o 0 0 PrA ti,4.1 When Will The Plan Be Implemented? Step 1 Public Hearing - July 26, 1993 Step 2 Introduction of Ordinance Establishing the Utility August 8, 1993 Step 3 Approval of Ordinance - August 23, 1993 Step 4 Publication of Ordinance September 1, 1993 Step 5 Ordinance Become Effective October 1, 1993 Step 6 Surface Water Management Utility Budget is approved as part of 1994 Budget -December, 1993 Step 7 • Utility is implemented January 1, 1994. First billing in April, 1994. s ��-�v� ��y;�� Table of Contents 1 Introduction 3 Golf Industry Patterns 4 • National Patterns 5 • State Patterns 5 • Local Patterns 7 Market Area Demographics 8 • Populations and Change 10 • Economic Status 11 • Public Access to Mounds View Golf Facility 12 Market Competition 13 • Primary Area 14 • Secondary Area 15 • Tertiary Area 18 Golfer Profiles 19 • Typology of Golfers and Preferences for Golf Venues 21 • Implications of Golfer Profiles for Market Share 23 Miscellaneous Considerations 24 • Miniature Golf 25 • Clubhouse Considerations 26 • Golf League Play at Mounds View 27 Economic Viability: "The Bottom Line" 28 • Executive Course Fee Structure Considerations 30 • 20-year Proforma 39 Summary M N Introduction i• i• Introduction This report has been prepared for the City of Mounds View — the Golf Committee, the City Council, and the City Administration. It is intended to furnish information which will assist the city in making a decision regarding the development of golf facilities. The report covers all aspects agreed to between the City of Mounds View and Effective Golf Course Systems. Golf industry trends are reviewed with commentary on the national, state, and local level. Detailed area demographic information with trends is furnished. An analysis of the market and market competition in the Primary and Secondary market areas is detailed. A profile or typology of golfers and their attraction to various golf venues is presented. Although a 10-year economic projection (proforma) was called for in the contract for services, EGCS has taken the liberty of preparing a 20-year proforma. In our experience, decisions regarding economic viability of municipal golf projects are based most often on 20-year projections, a common period of time for issuance of revenue bonds. Effective Golf Course Systems was pleased to have the opportunity to work with the City of Mounds View on this project, and hopes that it may be of further assistance should the city proceed with the development of golf facilities. 2 1I • lb t r c • t N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1� Industry Patterns: National, State, and Local National Patterns Among leisure sports and activities, golf over the past decade, and particularly the past five years has been a growth industry. In 1991, 351 new courses opened for play in the United States, another 583 were under construction, and 674 were in the planning stages. In May 1993, Golf Course News reported that 171 new courses were approved for construction in the past three months. Most of the new courses that have opened over the past several decades have been courses intended for public play — resort courses, privately owned public play courses, and municipal courses. These patterns of growth can be traced to a number of factors. Several decades ago, manufacturers of golf equipment broke away from selling their top -of -the -line golfing equipment exclusively through pro shops, and sold to golf discount houses as well. This brought the price of high quality golf clubs, shoes and balls within the reach of the large middle class and unleashed an increased demand for golf. These new golfers flocked to the public courses, the only venue affordable for them. In this group were increased numbers of women. The largest percentage of new golfers in recent years has been women. This is a result of increased leisure time, more income for women in the work place, and the coming of age of equal opportunities in sports for women. This wave has been accompanied by increases of seniors — both men and women — playing golf, as golf is recognized as a lifetime sports opportunity. The number of golfers, nationally, by golfer segment, is reported in the table below for 1987 to 1991. Number of Golfers in Millions by Golfer Segment: 1987 to 1991 Annual Growth Segment .11$2 1988 1989 12K 1991 Rate: 1987-91 Core 10.2 11.0 11.3 11.8 11.5 +2.9% Occasional 9.6 10.5 11.4 13.9 11.5 +4.6% Tuniors 1.4 1.5 1.5 2.1 1.8 +6.1% Total 21.2 23.0 24.2 27.8 24.8 +3.9% 4 1 1 i 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 f• The dip in 1991 has been largely attributable to the recession. The leisure industry is not invulnerable to a recession, but during recessions it is generally thought that, for leisure, people tend to stay closer to home. This should bode well for golf facilities in reasonable proximity to the golfer's residence, and not well for resort facilities. It should also bode well for golfing venues that are moderately priced in relation to the quality of the golfing facilities. State Patterns If the national pattern looks positive, the situation in the state of Minnesota is even more so. The National Golf Foundation report, Golf Participation in the U.S. / 1992 Edition shows Minnesota leading the nation in the percentage of residents age 12 and over who play golf. At 20.4 percent of the population, it is estimated that 823,000 Minnesotans play golf. This information was the basis of an article in the May/June issue of Golf Market Today which was headlined, "Minnesota Leads in Zest for Golf." To quote: The participation rates show what percentage of a states population are golfers and serves as sort of a popularity index... The leaderboards show Minnesota leading the nation for the third straight year.. According to the latest analyses, 20.4% of the Gopher State's citizens age 12 and over play golf. This is nearly twice the national rate of 11.9%. Metro Patterns Minnesota's zest for golf is reflected in ways other than participation rates. The Minnesota Golf Association, an organization with membership of private clubs, public courses and individual golfers is acknowledged nationally as one of the strongest golf associations in the U.S. The United States Golf Association reports that by 1994, Minnesota will be the only state in the country that will have hosted all of its various national championships. The Men's U.S. Open hosted by Hazeltine National Golf Club in 1991 set all-time attendance marks for U. S. Open championships, reflecting once again Minnesotans' enthusiasm for golf. Golf is popular locally as well with 104 courses located in the Twin Cities Metro Area. While the private club market seems somewhat depressed (as evidenced by newspaper ads and television commercials offering memberships at discount prices), the demand for public golf is strong. It is difficult to get tee times at many public courses, particularly on weekends, and particularly at the better public facilities. The chances of getting on the established quality 5 public courses in the Twin Cities on weekdays is fair and on weekends is fair to poor. A sampling of courses opened in the past several years — River Oaks, Stonebrooke, Timber Creek, Fox Hollow, and Deer Run — shows that the chances of getting to play as a "walk on" is only "fair" for both weekdays and weekends. Inverwood in Inver Grove Heights opened in August 1992, and in early 1993 is reporting sell-outs on weekends and season Patron Card sales of 800 by mid -May. EGCS's review of the foregoing patterns suggests that golf facilities that are of good quality in design, construction and maintenance should fare very well in the local market. 6 Market Area Demographics POPULATIONS AND CHANGE Mounds View Market Area City 1980 1990 % change 3-mile 6-mile population population 80-90 pop pop Blaine 28,558 38,975 36.5% 4,872 19,488 Circle Pines 3,321 4,704 41.6% 588 4,704 Coon Rapids 35,826 52,978 47.9% 0 13,245 Fridley 30,228 28,335 -6.3% 14,168 28,35 Lexington 2,150 2,279 6.0% 1,140 2,279 Lino Lakes 4,966 8,807 77.3% 0 39 Brooklyn Center 31,230 28,887 -7.5% 0 7,222 Brooklyn Park 43,332 56,381 30.1% 0 7,048 Minneapolis 370,951 368,383 -0.7% 0 46,048 Spring Park 1,465 1,571 7.2% 786 1,571 Arden Hills 8,012 9,199 14.8% 6,133 9,199 Little Canada 7,102 8,971 26.3% 0 359 Mounds View 12,03 12,541 -0.4% 12,541 12,541 New Brighton 23,269 22,207 -4.6% 19,431 22,207 North Oaks 2,846 3,386 19.0% 0 2,709 Roseville 35,820 33,485 -6.5% 0 16,743 Shoreview 17,300 24,587 42.1% 12,294 24,587 Vadnais Heights 5.111 11.041 116.0% 0 3.680 TOTAL 664,080 716,717 7.9% 71,953 222,004 A determination of the relative proportion of each community, above, that was circumscribed by 3-mile and 6-mile radius circles representing the primary and secondary market areas for the Mounds View golf facility was made. That was applied to the 1990 population of each community to determine the estimated population in the primary and secondary markets. General population trends over the past 10 years are also reported above. Approximately 72,000 people reside in the primary market area, while nearly a quarter of a million (222,004) reside within six miles of the proposed facility. The primary (3-mile radius), secondary (6-mile radius) and tertiary (8-mile radius) market areas are shown on page 16, "Golf Facilities in the Market Area. The residential development in the market area is portrayed on the next page. Comparisons of area populations can be made with the saturation of golf facilities can be made with course data presented later. Needless to say, the site of the proposed facilities in Mounds View is within range of a very sizable population with which to cultivate business. N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• ECONOMIC STATUS Mounds View Market Area Trends in Household Income City 1979 Household Income Mounds View Blaine Spring Park Fridley New Brighton Arden Hills Shoreview Lexington Circle Pines Coon Rapids Brooklyn Park Brooklyn Center Minneapolis Roseville Little Canada Vadnais Heights North Oaks Lino Lakes $36,607 40,211 28,028 38,297 41,283 46,635 44,375 30,931 42,772 41,955 37,140 37,345 24,052 41,964 32,608 36,956 89,306 39,579 1989 Household Percent Income Change $37,717 40,404 30,031 36,855 40,324 56,050 48,828 30,806 45,233 42,069 40,018 34,168 25,324 37,862 34,015 43,929 114,470 45,578 1.39 0.48 7.15 - 3.76 - 2.32 20.19 10.03 -0.40 5.75 0.27 7.75 -8.51 5.29 -9.77 4.31 18.87 28.18 15.16 Source: U.S. Census The seven -county Twin Cities Metropolitan Area has 192 cities and townships. The median household income in this area is $40,739, which is $3,022 higher than Mounds View. Mounds View ranks 126th out of the 192 cities and townships in household income. Five of the seven cities (for which 50 percent or more of their land area falls) in the Primary Market (3 miles) report household incomes lower than the metro area average, the exceptions being Arden Hills and Shoreview. Ten of the 18 communities which fall in whole or in part within a six -mile radius of the proposed golf facility report household incomes higher than the metro average. The proposed golf facilities are not designed nor intended to address the high -end, upscale sector of the golf market, and EGCS feels that the nature of the golf facility is well - positioned, given the economic status of residents in the market area. 10 PUBLIC ACCESS TO MOUNDS VIEW GOLF FACILITY Mounds View Market Area Often as important as radial distance to a golf facility is the ease or time taken to get there. An example is Inver Wood, the new municipal golf facility in Inver Grove Heights. Inver Wood is only 10 minutes from downtown St. Paul, thanks to the Lafayette Bridge and freeway, and not more than 25 minutes from downtown Minneapolis, thanks to I-94 or I-494. The Twin Cities Metro Area is covered with good freeway systems. An examination of "Golf Facilities in the Market Area" on page 16, reveals that the proposed site is nestled immediately between I-35W and Highway 118. It is also very close to County Road J, Highway 10 and Highway 65. Not far away are I-694, Highway 47, Highway 49 and Highway 96. By car, the site is literally just minutes away from golfers in the primary and secondary market areas. It is fair to say that public access by roads and highways to the proposed Mounds View site is excellent. It will be important to create signage and access in the immediate vacinity of the facility to complement its generally excellent location. 11 Market Competition 1 i• 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• Profile of Golf Facilities in the Market Area: Implications for Mounds View Primary Area All public golf facilities in the primary and secondary market areas were visited by EGCS. Data were gathered and are reported on the chart on page 17, "Facilities Data: Mounds View Market Area." The location of the facilities is shown on page 16. Four public facilities are situated in the 3-mile radius Primary Market Area, two executive courses and two driving ranges. Brightwood Hills, a 1,556-yard executive course, offers season memberships as well as a variety of daily fees for regular adults, seniors, and juniors on weekdays and a higher common fee on weekends. Season memberships range from $200 for juniors to $410 for families. Brightwood Hills reported 38,000 rounds played in 1992, with saturation rates (% of tee times filled) of 85 percent on weekdays and 95 percent on weekends. Brightwood does not have a driving range. Food options are vending machines. Kate Haven, a 1,663-yard excutive course, also offers season memberships and a variety of daily fees for regular adults, seniors, and juniors on weekdays and a higher common fee on weekends. Season memberships are significantly higher at Kate Haven, ranging from $285 for juniors to $495 for families. Data on number of rounds played in 1992 was not available, but estimates of saturation rates were lower at Kate Haven at 50 percent on weekdays and 80 percent on weekends. Kate Haven also does not have a driving range. Food options included self -serve vending machines and minimal fast food operations. Although Brightwood Hills is nearly full, Kate Haven functions at only half capacity on weekdays. This suggests that, to some extent, supply exceeds demand in the Primary Market Area. It is the view of EGCS that the supply/demand relationship is strongly affected by the quality of golfing facilities. Given comparable price structures, golfers will choose the better quality golf facility. We believe that Mounds View business will build to capacity or near capacity, while others in the Primary Market Area may well remain at less than capacity. In terms of driving ranges or practice centers in the Primary Market Area, Airena is a quality practice facility. Although it has priced a large basket of balls at $3.75, it reports business during the golf season as very slow. This is not surprising, as M t• golfers strongly prefer to hit balls outdoors and witness the full flight of the ball. Braemar Golf Dome in Edina closes for seven months during the golf season. Airena should not be considered competitive with Mounds View. The second practice center in the Primary Market Area is Brighton Crossroads. As a quality outdoor facility, Brighton Crossroads will be in competition with Mounds View. Mounds View may have a competitive advantage in the sense that, with both a driving range and an executive course, it can promote the theme, "Practice and play at Mounds View" or "Learn, practice, and play at Mounds View." Mounds View will discover that practice on the range leads to play on the course, and lesson programs lead both to practice on the range and play on the course. Secondary Area The Secondary Market Area constitutes a 3-6 mile radius ring surrounding the Primary Market Area. There are only two courses in this area, both full length 18-hole venues. There are no executive courses or driving ranges. The major course in this market area is Edinburgh USA. Considered the premier public facility in the Twin Cities Metro Area, Edinburgh hosts an annual Ladies Professional Golf Association (LPGA) tour event each summer. Most consider Edinburgh a challenging if not difficult course with numerous sand bunkers, some water holes, and some tight tree -lined fairways. Golf fees at Edinburgh are higher than other area public courses at $28 per round, but the better golfers who play and enjoy the challenge of Edinburgh seem not to mind this fee as the course reports weekday and weekend saturation rates at 100 percent. The number of annual rounds of golf totals 46,000. Edinburgh also has a driving range serviced by a ball machine which dispenses a rather small basket of balls at $2.50 per token. Edinburgh also has essentially complete food options with vending machines, a grill, and full dining service in the clubhouse. Edinburgh offers no season memberships, and is basically not seen as competitive with Mounds View for it serves primarily a different clientele with a different experience at a different price. Chomonix is the other 18-hole course in the Secondary Market, and offers a quality golfing experience and driving range. The range handles approximately 30 golfers, and baskets are priced at $2.50 and $3.50. No season memberships are offered. Chomonix is tucked away and a 1 14 little difficult to find at first. Golf fees are moderately priced with a $14 regular fee and only $9 for seniors on weekdays and $16 for everyone on weekends. Although annual number of rounds was not available, the saturation rates were estimated at 75 percent during the week and 100 percent on weekends. Chomonix has minimal fast food service available. Chomonix as a Secondary Market Area course with moderate prices is seen as moderately competitive with Mounds View. Tertiary Area This area represents a ring between six and eight miles in radius just outside the Secondary Market Area. More courses are located in this area. They include three 9-hole executive facilities (Roseville Cedarholm, Brookland, and Bunker Hills Exec), two 18-hole facilities (Gross and Columbia), a 27-hole facility (Bunker Hills), a 36-hole facility (Majestic Oaks), and a driving range (Shadow Ridge). The EGCS contract with Mounds View for this study called for identification and location of these facilities but not an inventorying of features and data. N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• • 1 Goon Rapids :: %' Region Golf Facilities in the Market Area Distance Ref # Facility Primary Market Area 0-3 miles 1 2 3 8 Ariena Driving Range Brightwood Hills Golf Course Kate Haven Golf Course Brighton Crossroads Range Secondary Market Area 3-6 miles 4 Edinburgh USA Golf Course 7 Chomonix Golf Course Tertiary Market Area 6-8 miles 5 Cedarholm Golf Course 6 Centerbrook Golf Course 9 Columbia Park Golf Course 10 Francis Gross Golf Course 11 Brookland Golf Course 12 Bunker Hills Golf Course 13 Shadow Ridge Driving Range 14 Majestic Oaks Golf Course -0 ci) 0 ci) („) -0 0 0 cat X X CO Cr) ,c2 if\ kr N in 00 (L) CDOCDO 'r cCi 8 8 of5 a) 0 Q., a to 2. z 0 z4 z 0 2 a -.74 01 0 -0.61, 4 ?,0 cz M C ob ob (i 2 44 a) oo 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Golfer Profiles 1 A TYPOLOGY OF GOLFERS AND THEIR PREFERENCES FOR GOLF VENUES In order to project a market for golf at a proposed site, it is important to understand various types of golfers and their preferences for features and quality in a golf course. The nature of golfers varies widely, from young golfers to old, men and women, from novice to expert, from the laid back and casual, to the social, to the highly competitive. What type of course these golfers prefer to play, or are even willing to play varies widely. The character or nature of a course will have a major effect on the nature and size of its clientele. Within certain limits, it is possible to predict what types of golfers prefer or are willing to play which types of courses. The novice, beginning, and junior golfer The novice or beginning golfer, unless a member of an upscale private club, does not have high expectations about the quality of the course on which to play or take lessons. If anything, this golfer might feel uncomfortable on a well- groomed course where the caliber of play is high and the pressure of keeping up with the group in front and not slowing down the group following is strongly felt. He (or she) would prefer to start out on a course where the expectations of play are not particularly high, where he would not embarrass himself. A course of more modest proportions that was uncrowded would be well -suited to this golfer. The social or family golfer The social golfer is looking for an enjoyable time spent with friends and acquaintances. Although the quality of the golfing facility is not unimportant to him or her, it is less important than it would be to the expert or low handicapper who might expect high quality in a golf course. The family golfer is looking for an opportunity to play with other family members, with wives, husbands, sons, or daughters. They are looking for an unharried outing, and the opportunity to get together for golf is more important than the quality of the golf course. 19 t• 1 1 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 t The middle handicapper The middle handicapper's golfing abilities are of sufficient magnitude to expect a certain standard of quality in a golf course. They may play a course of modest quality, but when presented with the possibility of playing a better course will usually choose that course. This golfer is more willing than the novice golfer to travel further and pay more for a higher quality golfing experience. The Low Handicapper The Senior Citizen The low handicapper plays golf at a level that expects a high quality golfing experience. This golfer has minimum, although unstated, expectations of a golf course — adequate length from the back tees, a challenging though fair test of one's golfing abilities, the presence of hazards such as sand bunkers, water hazards, challenging mowing practices, and well-groomed tees, fairways, and greens. This golfer will not play a course of marginal quality at any price, even if the course is only minutes away. He or she, if necessary, will travel up to an hour or more to play a quality course, and pay upwards of 50% more than the fee of a course of modest quality. This golfer is usually looking for an 18-hole, full-length golf course which is at least 6,000 yards in length, and preferably 6,500 yards or longer. The low handicapper, however, will patronize a quality practice facility that is nearby to hone his/her game. The senior citizen may be found in all of the previously described typologies. Age and health characteristics of seniors, however, may suggest the likelihood of playing different golfing venues. Seniors, unless they are low handicappers, are less likely to play a long difficult course. They are more likely to play a course that is comfortable for them. Seniors may live on fixed incomes, so the cost of playing golf also may be a factor. 20 TI os Likelihood* of Use by Typology for Courses in Mounds View Primary and Secondary Markets '(Likelihood: None, Small, Medium, Strong) Golf Facility Novice/Tr Family/Social Mid-hdcp Low-hdcp Sr Citizen Brightwood Hills (Exec, no range)Strong Strong Small None Strong Kate Haven (Exec, no range) Strong Strong Small None Strong Airena (indoor range) Small Small Small None Small Brighton Crossroads (range) Strong Strong Strong Medium Strong Edinburgh USA (18-hole + range)None Small Medium Strong Small Chomonix (18-hole + range) Small Medium Strong Strong Medium Mounds View (Exec + range) Strong Strong Medium Medium Strong (projected) Implications of golfer profiles for market share in primary and secondary markets The table, above, suggests that Brightwood Hills, Kate Haven, and Mounds View will appeal to (and compete for) similar market sectors — the novice or beginning golfer, the junior golfer, the family or social golfer, and senior citizens. The deciding factors in Mounds View competing successfully with these two executive courses in the primary market area are likely to be course quality (design, construction, and maintenance) and price., that is, value for the dollar. The table on executive courses reports the greens fees for Brightwood Hills and Kate Haven for 1993. Both courses are approximately 1,600 yards in length. By comparison the Mounds View fee for opening year in 1995 is suggested by EGCS as $8.00. The course length of Mounds View, however, is projected at 2,200 yards, 600 yards longer than the other two courses. If course length is a measure of value, then the fee per yard represents a legitimate comparison. The fee per yard at Mounds View is 0.36 cents, whereas the fee per yard at Brightwood Hills and Kate Haven is identical at 0.42 cents per yard on weekdays and 0.48 cents per yard on weekends. The difference by 1995 will be greater if a fee increase occurs at Brightwood Hills and Kate Haven over the next two years. Although course quality comparisons are not possible at this point with the Mounds View facility yet to be built, one can assume that the Mounds View executive course will have a quality design with the services of Williams, Gill & Associates, 21 1 1 Miscellaneous Considerations 1 Miniature Golf Miniature golf is becoming very popular across the nation with some 50 courses presently under construction in the U.S. according to the National Golf Foundation's June, 1993 report. Miniature golf should be defined as golf that is primarily putting only. Par-3 courses and Executive courses are those in which the golf ball is actually lofted from tee to green. Miniature golf has generally been located in amusement parks or resort areas. Another location is near shopping centers. The perceived reason for this is that this golfing activity is not for the serious golfer, but more of an amusement activity. As a general rule, facilities have been privately owned. Recently, municipalities have begun to explore and build these facilities as a new source of revenue. The most prominent example in the Minneapolis /St. Paul metropolitan area is in Richfield. This facility was built this spring and is expected to open June, 1993. The cost was $300,000 on presently owned park land and does not include the already existing building for ticket sales, concession and restroom facilities. Richfield projects 1993 revenues to be $95,000. The anticipated payback on this addition to their park system is between three and five years. Miniature golf has a wide range of cost for varying themes and amounts of refinement to each facility. A simple putt -putt course can be built for less than $75,000 with little or no imagination included in each hole. However, the trend is to create larger sites with waterfalls and creative holes. These facilities cost anywhere from $250,000 to $750,000. The cost to play varies accordingly. Most simple courses charge $1.50 to $3.00. The range for more sophisticated courses is from $3.50 to as much as $8.00 per round for adults, less for children. Many of the resort or amusement courses have night lighting and are busiest from 6-10pm. Another appeal is for birthday party or group outings with an adjoining activity room. The general consensus from a financial viewpoint is that these facilities are fairly lucrative. Private owners are not usually willing to share their financial reports. The Roseville facility is some 15,000 square feet and takes approximately one hour to play. The hours of operation are from 10:00am to 10:00pm. 1 24 The fees are $3.50 to $4.50 with four employees operating a typical day. The addition of this type of facility at the Mounds View site depends on the emphasis on juniors and youth activity in this park as these will be a primary source for customers. Consideration for miniature golf on this site could also be determined at a later date, if financial constraints in the initial building process were such. However, a site should be planned accordingly as it relates to the clubhouse so that an economy of scale and efficiency can be achieved for control and administration. Miniature golf is often an impulse activity and visibility would greatly enhance its marketability. The compatibility of miniature golf with other golfing activities is not viewed by EGCS as a negative or detriment to the other golfing facilities. Mounds View Clubhouse Considerations The City of Mounds View should decide what role it wishes the clubhouse to play in the newly acquired park. EGCS views its role to identify a number of compatible functions. • Will the clubhouse only serve as a golf clubhouse with primarily seasonal use? • Will meeting rooms for year 'round community use be advantageous? • Will the building be designed for formal or informal meetings in addition to golf? • Will cross-country skiing be a winter use possibility? • Will future park department activities be headquartered at this location? • What level of food preparation will be planned for? • Will nature trail use or classes be included in this structure? • What level of golf merchandise should you carry? • What future planned park activities, if any, should be designed into a future expansion of the clubhouse? Year 'round use will dictate additional costs and energy considerations. Also, certain activities will demand accompanying storage space. EGCS is prepared to assist with the design options and site location of such a facility. EGCS feels strongly that visual control of the course and environs be maintained for safety, 25 • Economic Viability: The Bottom Line 1 20-year Proforma Proforma Notes o Proforma Figure 1, sheets 1 through 7, assumes a July 1, 1994 opening of the Driving Range and a July 1, 1995 opening of the Executive Course. ❑ Development costs are based on figures from Williams, Gill and Associates as reduced by the Mounds View Golf Committee on July 15, 1993 and reflected in the Springsted, Inc. Bond Analysis received on July 20, 1993. It is possible that some further development cost savings can be made as the final design phases are reached. EGCS will prepare a final Proforma when all cost data are final and the impact of the course design reductions can be fully analyzed. Significant changes in the analyses that follow are not expected. ❑ EGCS income items have been estimated on the conservative side. We believe that gross income, in a well managed operation coupled with average weather, will exceed these estimates by at least a small margin. Expense items, in a similar fashion, have been estimated on the high side of expected expenses. We believe that these two assumptions minimize financial risk to the City. 1 SHEET 1 OF 7 N CC IX - �_ Z CO PROPOSED MOUNDS VIEW EFFECTIVE GOLF PREPARED BY: ON SHEET 7 N 1)- REVENUE ITEMS: II II 11 II II 11 II W N 0 U 9-HOLE EXECUTIVE ROUNDS PER YEAR 8 N O V) 8 a-- 0 In O N O N O Os: O. N O 4" H H NUMBER OF RENTALS M g 0 0 II IIIIII 1 O MMK 11 CO • I" I N III 11 "' 1 II 11 pp p 11 8 N 8 11 N co I tt- N N 1I N M I 8 II p 1 8i2 11 8ti I N • N 11 N"' 1 p 11 I ion 8. I1 F ° 1 N N N 11 O• M I N 11 11 p 1 11 O In 1 In II M 1 N 11 1 11 II I1 1 II II 40- II I 11 aII IL 1 1I I- 1171 11 1 w W 4 II W tJ 1 Z Iz H II W 2 11 G J W 11 H 1- • C II W Z II Z w • 6 11 C N N 11 O II > O > 1 y ✓ W 11 I -I 1* 110 • I• CD 0 M 11 N 44 II 11 11 II In In 11 8'° M ; v Wi In a UJ N u N M * AA*k*A*A* E FOOD CONCESSIONS N ti 0 N N 0 N N N 0 * fc v N 4c 4c -- 1 • * 41 N Ki*c +c b y� Y N •Pc • IC Os N **AA**Ak* Y t Y O Y In Y • Y Y N Y Y Y Y 8` Y Is- 4C Nrd s rc t O +c i 40 Y N 411 .4.14 40 �Ic Y Y r a s K Y * GROSS REVENUES 0 N 4n N AL GROSS REVENUES CUMULATIVE GROSS REVENUES 32 • 1 N 1 1 1 1 1� SHEET 2 OF 7 ry lN II II II II w II II 1 II s II ti REVENUE ITEMS: 11 II 11 11 II 11 I II II II 11 II II II II I1 1 II II II II II II II II II 11 I1 W 11 0 II 11 � EXECUTIVE COURSE: CC W r ROUNDS PER II II H II II 8 11 11 N 11 11 44 II II II 44 ▪ II II 11 • II 49 1I II ON II M II 4- 8 W 1I 4, 4, .0 N N • N N W 1- DRIVING RANGE: SEE 8 N crc N OF BUCKETS $ PER BUCKET s O. 11 1I 11 11 II W cc 11 11 II uJ II i Q II z II l7 1 I 9c4c an N ..• 444 c•Ic an an ccc *•14 Qn f.. v. c p i� i*t N S Y! 0 NNl NO ��94 1 �y#ct # c i * N is �c N * Ic is is M 8 co CIN N tel N 8 rn 0 N N CO94 44 is -cc O +c ti 4C N t CO lc 4, N 0 e�- N N N ' 33 • 1 M SHEET 3 OF 7 N EXPENSE ITEMS: COURSE AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE TIME PERSONNEL: S/YR • M M W • K 69 IA an O0 • st LA CO 49 N CO ▪ ON a N N O CO a W • IA N 49 to �..0 M 4 N N N 0 0 0 M • O • 1 Wan 49 49 8 8 L N44 N o N SUPERINTENDENT PERSONNEL: CHEMICALS/FERTILIZER N N 'O ti H In N 0 N 1/1 O 8 IA TOTAL C&G EXPENSE COURSE OPERATIONS 8 I,- O F$ r o N H N • N 44 N NN N rn NN N O .12 OD K N W .- N 49 M N N N an Q 0MA 'O O 'D I- O 03 O N N M N N N N N M N N N in IA an in a0 P t- ti P IA M ONO O N CO NN N N M H W N N N coMR CO 8 an IA M co M1 O N • CO N N W H N N H N N N • N -Y' O— N O0O 0, IAA 0 8 Is- N N N 49 N N N N W N N N to M M to N 'O N Q to N N N 'O to M a - CD to 4 N M -1 NO I- N - N I,-N W N N N N N N 44 CO O O to N o� • g `O O C0 to c 1 N 1A N c- - �t NN • N ▪ • H IAN N N69 N H O OIA e- N N N N N 44 • M O O O H N ▪ 4UN M1f H H N 9-MONTH MANAGER PERSONNEL: W F Z N . N PHONES/UTILITIES BLDG MAINTENANCE CART LEASE OF GOOD SOLD LA 0 0 u ij DUES, LICENSES ADVERTISING CO y LA $tA to N 8 T N 0 CO fel N TOTAL COURSE EXPENSE DRIVING RANGE O to Q N g c- O M N N N 0 O Ow • N49 N 0% O 149 au ▪ N H in O W 44 N to M ALA N B y49 N PI O VD N H N 0 an • IA • 8 N O O N IA 111 N N SALARY/WAGES 0' O� N ti UN N L DRIVING RANGE E 1- art N UN N N 34 1 t N 1 SHEET 4 OF 7 le S O O N N O N N 0 N FULL TIME PERSONNEL: $/YR co in pM O n N N N 43 .1.N 44 N H Os 4- sst CO Os In 111 44 N N �O 43 00 O LA IA N 44 N N 44 V! O en P ti c- N 44 N N N t` P L- Cn s.O r- N N 44 ti O O. UN en V* 44 O LAIA �O N tel 'O N N 44 SUPERINTENDENT PERSONNEL: J N W CA CHEMICALS/FERTILIZER 0 M H ti sO N S e- �O N 43 N M Y'1 N 00 M_ N $138606 $143291 TOTAL C&G EXPENSE COURSE OPERATIONS a- LA-t M to 0 cs1O fnirs O sO M N M O N N e- M H N N N N N N 44 N Os CO sO N .t f` 'O N N N e- '0 0 in O' 'O N 0 Cn N e- M O N O e- M M .t e- N a- N .t N N N N N N N f� CO 00 to 'O 00 CO N O M in co Q P a.4 M .t crs NM en 44 M N N N N 44 oN .t 'OCY fel 'O N 8 Nos N M H N N N N f9 N VO .1 'O F- O. en 0QMOMP Qs Os CO p MMN N N N N N N N N ON-p 0' '0 Ipp• IA �Mp 0O0 M1 O N O' m 4 a- M N N N N 49 N N N N aNcN-ONp Cn 00 co 2 O O0N MM- N MH e9 M N N 49 N Is- in CO in P IA C4 N 000 CO 0 e- M N fel N e9 N N M N 49 N N 44 N ('.Jr- IA in O' .T O ul � N 0 P.- � 00 .t Os CV 00 e- 0 e- M N N N N N N N N 44 N �O 0 MVP.0S O O HHQNNNN In NN N N f9 COLA XI � 0' ONO 'O .t O O 2O �O N O' r- N c- 00 c- M N M1 N N N N N N N N N N PERSONNEL: PHONES/UTILITIES BLDG MAINTENANCE CART LEASE COST OF GOOD SOLD V) W N W Cd M J N W Ci G ADVERTISING 1/1 O Cn H a 'O N N in fO M N $120040 $123956 TOTAL COURSE EXPENSE DRIVING RANGE CO es - .Mt fel N H N N N 8IA K w N v 8 N f0 .T N N e9 N a CO N N N 44 0-3 M $17276 $19004 N O .0 43 M N1 e- N 49 e9 tfl co ER r. CN O M N N N M N SALARY/WAGES O N i*c M Is- 4c � # S 44 i*c N is mg 4* �C N 4c Os M en * 1 * til M N 4C fel iC Is.- x N # N rC 4 CO tel 4 00 IA -4C lel Is - IC Os 00ii 7st 44 8 M Npn * lel IC 94 tiM s : NN, * i N i Os # e- M O N L DRIVING RANGE EXPENSE 1-- ***k**A**A***********A** ALL EXPENSES I J F 575105 $4945935 $3217590 $3539154 $3872257 $4217398 $ 35 i i i • SEE NOTE 2 CAPITAL COSTS AND NET INCOME AFTER DEBT SERVICE SUMMARIES: SHEET 5 OF 7 8 8 CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT COSTS LAND PURCHASE W N C 0 t-) W J 0 0' rt N N 0 0 0 0LA �t 1- V1 ti M '0 V1 4- 4- M M N N 4, CONSTRUCTION CAPITALIZED 8 N TOTAL ISSUE LESS CONTINGENCY 43 CONTINGENCY B TOTAL BOND ISSUE *AA*AAA*AAk ********A**AA***** 44 44 t 4C r K *AA**A****Ak****AAAAAAA*AA*AAA*******AAA* Y C E E E N ANNUAL NET INCOME 1 eal M co N O LA 1 Al r ti � M M N N N N J Os in N in43 N N N 0 N s ti 43 VM1 N co N N N a pop 43 (T % •9 N N OCO N a v O CO N O(1 00 H N N CO 53 perp.. in O� v1 H N M O MM ti O� aU N N N N IA a- N N N N TOTAL GROSS REVENUES CITY UP FRONT CONTRIBUTION ANNUAL SURPLUS NET DEBT SERVICE INCOME AFTER DEBT SERVICE M I- os ul Oa M N N 0 N N N N rn N N V1 0' s 4- N N N TOTAL GROSS EXPENSES: CITY LOAN REPAYMENT P co 4, N n 4, N M M N CO 8 8 N ANNUAL SURPLUS (DEFICIT) 0 O n N N N O' N O S N CO H 8 8 N CUMULATIVE NET INCOME i 36 1 1 0 % S § k t & t a t©\ « � kk- 1 -3 I &. §�1 Vt.; « & # I 3. «\Q « a « 2fi,� / t& I03rt \ 5 # ƒ S # a 44 k k44 1 tom« ot & © % 11. ��� G to u. ) 41 $ . et 0- ƒ ƒ . S trn ® ° $III »ma °ƒ«k 1.0 % & sa & 4. E a 4 6 0 f Q 4 TA 41) \_ I tat / % & $ $ % . & % k»&� . Ca ���� $ a 2 4 s 2 i CA ƒ 4 k k « t aa.S t % K 0 / 2 � k k 0 j % o t s ) a CO o Ili I >-0 k to «�ow / «tu 0 © * & \ « k * k 1 « 38 ) « § .4 .§ $ Z g % 1 Summary Market Potential for Mounds View Course SUMMARY In a number of ways, the market for the Mounds View golf facility has already been discussed — in the Golfer Profile section, in projected number of rounds and use of the driving range in the abbreviated proforma, etc. Market potential will depend heavily on (1) the design and layout of the course (Is it interesting and challenging yet playable across all skill levels of golf?); (2) quality construction and maintenance (Well built according to the specifications of the course architect and well groomed and maintained?); (3) fee structures that represent good value for the dollar; (4) a driving range or practice center that effectively promotes the development of shot -making skills. Marketing potential will also depend heavily on the capacity of Mounds View to tap its natural market as outlined in the Golfer Profile section — the novice or beginning golfer, junior golfers, social or family golfers, women golfers and senior golfers. Note what the National Golf Foundation said in its "Summary of Leading Action Recommendations," — those ideas and program suggestions receiving the greatest support from Golf Summit '92 participants. 1. Encourage more people to try tbe game A. Develop a media/marketing campaign promoting golf participation. Emphasize FUN FITNESS and FAMILY, and that golf is a GAME FOR ALL. 2. Improve our ability to ease tbe beginning golfer's entry into tbe game. A. Do a better job of retaining beginners and developing them into avid golfers Create education/development programs that are geared to beginners, i.e. that are fun and designed to minimize embarrassment and intimidation. B. Develop more facilities appropriate for the beginning golfer...and link with player development programs. 1. Alternatives to regulation facilities: Promote the development of non-traditional golf facilities, particularly in urban areas where land is at a premium. Comment: There were many (at the Golf Summit) who agreed that the industry should rethink the traditional 18-hole or 9- 40 bole facility concept...and begin considering smaller parcels of land. The types of facilities most mentioned were golf ranges, par-3s and executive courses. The facility that Mounds View proposes to develop addresses very well the future needs in the golf industry as identified by participants at the National Golf Foundation's Golf Summit '92. 41 MEMORANDUM TO: SAMANTHA ORDUNO, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: MICHELE SEVERSON, ADMINISTRATION SECRETARY DATE: JULY 27, 1993 RE: CONCERNS FROM COUNCIL MEETING, JULY 26, 1993 • Lyle Nelson, 2357 Sherwood was concerned about sound barriers on 610. Also wanted to know if there was a timetable for the Harstad development. Concerned about flooding problems in the City. Was speaking at the meeting on behalf of Barb and John Savage, 7721 Bona Road, who could not make the meeting. Mr. Nelson noted that the heavy rains and water caved in a wall on Savages in -ground pool. Wanted someone to contact the Savages. Savage's phone number 786-4856. • Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road commended the City Council on the Festival In The Park on a great job. Mr. Frits stated that he had heard no disparaging remarks. Mr. Frits suggested the City begin working on implementing next year's Festival. • James Paron, 2288 Highway 10 had a concern about the property south of Woodale and north of Highway 10. On the north side a nice culvert was put in and on the east 20 feet of plastic pipe. This property has flooded and last winter killed off 30 to 40 small trees. • Mr. John Kroeger, 8280 Pleasant View Drive lives on the border of Mounds View and Spring Lake Park and for the past seven out of eight years has had to pump his property because of flooding. Can anything be done for him by the two cities? • Mr. Ren Zhou, 2741 Ardan stated that after the heavy rainfall his driveway had flooding that went to a low spot in his front yard and also had flooding in his backyard. Stated that the drain in the front of the house was slow and that the drain in his backyard was not flowing. I have attached to this memorandum a handout that Mr. Zhou gave to the City Council. • Mr. Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road stated that he does not see the need for a Surface Water Management Plan at this time. Mr. Frits. also made mention that the Surface. Water Management Plan is just another tax and that the City will collect the money and earn interest on his money. He wants to earn the interest himself. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE .JULY 26, 1993 Agenda Section: 9.B. Report Number. 93-564C Report Date: 7-21-93 Council Action: O Special Order of Business ❑ Public Hearings O Consent Agenda 3'0 Council Business Item Description: Ordinance No. 527, An Qrdinance Amending Chapter 2.09 of the Municipal Code of the City of Mo %s View Entitled, "Compensation of Mayor and Council" Administrator's Review/Recommendation: J - No comments to supplement this report G�f "� - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement s ets :: necessary.) arlmaasm At the July 12, 1993 Mounds View City Council meeting, the City Council read Ordinance No. 527 proposing an increase to Mayor and Council salaries. This Ordinance, if approved tonight, would repeal Ordinance No. 450 (which set the council salaries at their existing rate) and would also amend Chapter 2.09 of the Mounds View Municipal Code entitled 'Compensation for Mayor and Council' to reflect the proposed increases. The compensation increase for Mayor and Council is proposed to better bring Mounds View's City Council salaries in line with that of other municipalities in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area. Although this increase would better offset the salary disparity, these salaries would still be among the lowest in the Metropolitan area. The current annual salary for the Mayor is $3,600. It is proposed that this salary be increased to $5,100• per year. The current salary for Councilmembers is $3,300 per year. It is proposed that these salaries be increased to $4,500 per year. Because state law and municipal code both state "a salary increase cannot become effective until after the next municipal election," this Ordinance could become effective following the special election to fill the vacant Council seat. This election is scheduled for August 24, 1993. This would allow for the salary increases to become effective August 27, 1993, which is 30 days after the ordinance would be published. Otille410( Tim Cruikshank, Asst. to City Admin. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to waive reading and adopt Ordinance No. 527, salary increases for Mayor and Councilmembers. ORDINANCE NO. 527 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA An ordinance amending Chapter 2.09 of the Municipal Code of the City of Mounds View entitled "Compensation of Mayor and Council". The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. Chapter 2.09, Subd. 1, Mayor's Compensation, is amended as follows: Subdivision 1. Mayor's Compensation. The salary of the Mayor is fixed at $5,100.00 per year. SECTION II. Chapter 2.09, Subd. 2, Councilmember's Compensation, is amended as follows: Subdivision 2. Councilmember's Compensation. The salary of Councilmembers is fixed at $4,500.00 per year. SECTION I11. Ordinance No. 450, an Ordinance fixing the salaries of the Mayor and Councilmembers, is repealed. SECTION IV. . EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this ordinance is thirty (30) days from and after its date of publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on the 12th day of July, 1993. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 26th day of July, 1993. ATTEST: (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: MAYOR CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR CITY ATTORNEY OU ADD S GEW REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE 'Y 26, 1993 Agenda Section: Report Number: Report Date: 9.C. 9.3-565C 7/21/93 Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business ❑ Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda gi Council Business Item Description: Consideration of Request of Bid Award for Paving Silver View Park Path Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; Bids for the paving of Silver View Park trailway are due Friday, August 23. Bid opening is Monday morning, August 26, 1993. Following the bid opening I will provide a recommendation for City Council approval - - to be presented at the Council meeting Monday evening, July 26, 1993. I wish to expedite this project for completion in August and for this reason requesting Council's approval at July 26 Council meeting. The next earliest meeting would be August 9 and that is toy` long a time. Everyone is anxious to get the trail in. As a reminder, this is a LAWCON matching grant project. You will hear from me at the Council Meeting requesting approval of the recommended bid. aarion, Director Parks, Recr:ji' ion and Forestry Department RECOMMENDATION; nif REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE 7A&1 q Agenda Section: Report Number: Report Date: Council Action: Special Order of Business ❑ Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda $j Council Business Item Description: Bid award for Silver View Park path paving. g4-9,7,:4a7‘ae.e.,S Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. ✓ Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY: Bids were opened for the paving of Silver View Park pathway this day, Monday, July 26, 1993 at 10:00 a.m. Four bids were received. The bids were as follows: Bituminous Consulting and Contracting Co. Inc. $14,840 Diversified Paving, Inc. 16,980 Midwest Asphalt Corp. 23,900 Arcade Asphalt, Inc. 28,038 I have called references provided by Bituminous Consulting and Contracting Co., Inc. and have had good reports of good quality work. It is therefore my recommendation to the City Council to award the project to Bituminous Consulting and Contracting Co. Inc. Since this project is funded with grant monies, I wish to request the Council to approve additions to this project bid to equal the total grant dollars, including increased restoration of the path including more than one row of sod on each side as well as increased lineal paving to include the area from the parking lot to Silver Lake Road in the area omitting the storm water drainage ditch. It is to the City's benefit to take advantage of the total amount of grant monies available for this park improvement and for this reason I wish to request the opportunity to increase both the lineal footage of trail to the East (to Silver Lake Road) and provide increased restoration of the path, both of which fall within the scope of this trail grant project. jECOMMENDATION; niWADS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION f ,STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL. MEETING DATE JULY 26, 1993 Agenda Section: 9.D. Report Number: 93-566C Report Date: 7/21/93 Council Action: O Special Order of Business Cl Public Hearings 0 Consent Agenda Ific Council Business Item Description: Continued Discussion Regarding Request for Conditional Use Permit/Variance For Gateway Foods, 2390 Highway. 10, Planning Case No. 362-93 Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) UMMARY; At the July 12, 1993 City Council Meeting, Staff and the City Attorney were directed by the Council to draft a resolution of denial for the requested variance at 2390 Highway 10. The Council determined that the variance, necessary for the placement of a fully automated car wash on the property at a setback less than that required by Municipal Code, did not meet the criteria for approval as outlined in the Municipal Code or State Statutes. Following this decision, the applicant has decided to relocate the structure on the property. Although no site plan has been reviewed, the applicant assures Staff that the new location of the facility on .the property meets all applicable setback requirements. The applicant is requesting that this new plan be considered in light of the fact that a variance is no longer necessary. Staff sees no problem in reviewing the alternative site plan, however, referral of the request back to the Planning Commission level would appear appropriate. Paul Harrington; City Planner RECOMMENDATION: Take no action on the requested variance and refer the alternative site plan back to the Planning Commission for review. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL. MEETING DATE JUT,Y 26, 1993 Agenda Section: 9_.E . Report Number. 93-5.67c Report Date: 7/21/93 Council Action: O Special Order of Business O Public Hearings O Consent Agenda Q Council Business Item Description: Consideration of Agreement for Environmental Services Regarding the Proposed Golf Course Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) TTMMARY; The Golf Course Task Force has recommended that the City utilize the services of Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. (PECI) for environmental services relating to the construction of the proposed golf course. The proposed golf course and the adjacent proposed trailway system involve several environmental issues such as wetland delineation and mitigation permitting. The services proposed by PECI involve the following services: * evaluation of the course master plan * wetland delineation * agency coordination regarding permitting issues * mitigation design * Army Corps Section 404 Permit Modification * Rice Creek Watershed District Permit Certification * City Wetland Alteration Permit * MN DNR Water Appropriation Permit * Task Force meetings The cost of the services is estimated at between $8,895 and $9,720 plus direct costs (i.e. mailing, phone calls, mileage, printing) of approximately $1,.780. The total costs for the environmental services. from PECI should not exceed $11,500, with the exception of unusual or unforseen environmental issues which would require additional services. rduno,' City Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to execute an Agreement for Environmental Services with Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. (PECI) at a cost not to exceed $11,500 to be paid for out of Account No. 698- 4120-303 �u �y a(0,1793 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL J U LY 26, 1993 7:00 P.M. AGENDA The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by staff and appointed commissions, committees and boards. Decisions are based on this information, as well as City policy and practices, input from constituents and a Councilmember's personal judgement. If you have comments, questions or information regarding an item on the agenda, please step forward to be recognized by the Mayor during the "Residents Requests and Comments From the Floor" item on the agenda. Please state your name and address for the record. All comments are appreciated. A copy of all printed materials relating to the agenda item is available for public inspection at the Recording Secretary's Table. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL - Wuori Quick Linke Blanchard 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 12, 1993 Regular Meeting COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: AGENDA PAGE TWO J U LY 26, 1993 5. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Set Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m., Monday, August 9, 1993, to Consider Revocation of Conditional Use Permit at 3030 County Road J B. Set Public Hearing for 7:06 p.m., Monday, August 9, 1993, to Reconsider Variance Request (Parking Reduction) at 2840 Highway 10, Simon T. Simon C. Set Public Hearing for the Introduction of the 1993 Long Term Financial Plan for Monday, August 9, 1993 at 7:07 p.m. D. Set Meeting of Canvassing Board for Wednesday, August 25, 1993 at 5:30 p.m. to Canvass the Election Results of the August 24, 1993 Special Election E. Adopt Resolution No. 4393 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds F. Authorize Payment for Structural Architect Consulting Services Regarding Proposed Golf Course, Staff Report No. 93-560C (Staff Presenter: Samantha Orduno, City Administrator) G. Consideration of Purchase of Air Compressor, Staff Report No. 93-561 C (Staff Presenter: Mike Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor) H. Licenses for Approval Signs - Expires 6/30/94 Simon Signs, Inc. - New DeMars Signs, Inc. - New HVAC - Expires 6/30/94 Allen Mechanical, Inc. - Renewal COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: AGENDA PAGE THREE J U LY 26, 1993 6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: There is no special order of business scheduled for this meeting. 7. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR Citizens' comments are encouraged to allow individual citizens to address the Council, as a whole, on a matter of interest or concern to the citizens. The preservation of the Citizens' Comments item on the agenda is important in order to encourage and maintain this information flow. To preserve and protect this valuable communications link, a speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. 7:05 p.m. To Consider Request for Conditional Use Permit, (Minor Auto Repair), 2806 Highway 10, Ron Schmidt, Planning Case No. 365-93, Staff Report No. 93-562C (Staff Presenter: Paul Harrington, City Planner) b.. 7:06 p.m. - Resolution No. 4394 Approving/Denying Request for Conditional Use Permit, (Minor Auto Repair) 2806 Highway 10, Ron Schmidt, Planning Case No. 365-93 COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: Public Hearing to Consider Surface Water Management Utility (Staff Presenter: Samantha Orduno, City Administrator), Rocky Keene, Short - Elliott -Hendrickson COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: nior VareS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ,STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE JULY 26, 1993 Agenda Section: 5.F. Report Number. 93-560C Report Date: 7-21-93 Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business ❑ Public Hearings 10 Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Authorize Payment for Structural Architect Consulting Services Regarding Proposed Golf Course Administrators Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) ,gUMMARY; The Golf Course Task Force, in conjunction with the course architect, Garret Gill, utilized the services of Paul Madson and Associates Ltd, for preliminary design consultation for the proposed golf course clubhouse and maintenance building. The Task Force met several times with Mr. Madson and his associates to determine the design elements for all the structural buildings of the proposed course. Due to the cost reductions that the Task Force has had to make in the overall cost of the course, driving range, clubhouse and auxiliary buildings, it is not clear at this time if the Task Force will utilize the services of Paul Madson Associates; Ltd. in the future. The Task Force anticipates a reduction in the size and scope of the proposed golf course buildings (clubhouse and maintenance building). Future architectural services would be recommended to the City subsequent to an RFP process. The Task Force has requested that the Council authorize the payment of the to -date services in the amount of $1,396.24 for programming and schematic designs (including $46.24 in printing costs). Samanth Orduno, City Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve payment to Paul Madson Associates Limited for golf course building programming and schematic designs in the amount of $1,396.24 to be paid from account No. 698-4120-303.