Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 2008/12/22CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MOUNDS VIEW CITY HALL Monday, December 22, 2008 6:00 p.m. (Please Note the Early Start Time!) 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL: Marty, Stigney, Flaherty, Hull, Mueller 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 5. PUBLIC INPUT: Citizens may speak to issues not on tonight’s agenda. Before speaking, please give your full name and address for the minutes. Also, please limit your comments to three minutes. 6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS Recognition of Pinewood Elementary as a School of Excellence, Principal Bill Book and Staff 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. Resolution 7380, Approving Salary Compensation Study and 2009 Pay Plan. B. Resolution 7381, Approving the Findings of the Ardan Avenue Subdistrict Drainage Analysis. C. Resolution 7382, Approving the Plans and Specifications, Setting the Bid Date, and Authorizing the Advertisement for the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project. D. 7:15 Public Hearing 1. Resolution 7387 - Code Violations Abatement – 8379 Red Oak Drive (Moe) 2. Resolution 7388 - Code Violations Abatement – 5055-57 Sunny Side Road (Oberstar) 3. Resolution 7389 - Code Violations Abatement – 2070 Terrace Drive (Higgins) E. Resolution 7383 Approving Members to Various City Commissions and Committees. F. Resolution 7384, Setting the 2009 City Council Meeting Dates, Staff Retreat and 2009 Town Hall Meeting. G. Resolution 7377, Approving an Agreement with the Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC) for Housing Resource Center (HRC) Services. H. Resolution 7392, a Resolution Approving a Two-Year Labor Contract with LELS Local 234 (Mounds View Police Sergeants) Effective January 1, 2008. 8. CONSENT AGENDA A. Licenses for Approval B. Resolution 7385, Approving Therapeutic Massage License Renewals. C. Resolution 7386 Approving a Lease Assignment for and with Creative Kids Operating in the Mounds View Community Center D. Schedule a Public Hearing for Monday, January 12, 2009 at 7:05pm for the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update. E. Resolution 7390, Accepting the Pinewood Storm Sewer Repair and Authorizing Final Payment. City Council Agenda December 22, 2008 Page 2 9. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS 10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. November 24, 2008, City Council Minutes. 11. REPORTS A. Reports of Mayor and Council B. Reports of Staff 1. Report from Bonestroo about Arden Hill’s Proposed I-35W & County Road H Interchange Improvements 2. Report from Bonestroo about Traffic Counts on Red Oak Drive at Long Lake Road C. Reports of City Attorney 12. Next Council Work Session: Monday, January 5, 2009, at 7:00 p.m. Next Council Meeting: (Special), Monday, January 5, 2009, at 6:00 p.m. Item No: 07A Meeting Date: Dec 22, 2008 Type of Business: Council Business Administrator Review : ___ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: James Ericson, Clerk-Administrator Item Title/Subject: Resolution 7380, Approving the Salary Compensation Study and 2009 Pay Plan Introduction: On June 9, 2008, the City Council approved Resolution 7281 which authorized Springsted to conduct a compensation study and market wage analysis. The work was completed however due to reliability issues with the HAY points assigned to each position and limited responses for other positions, staff was unable to prepare a comprehensive pay plan for Council consideration. The City Council has expressed a strong desire to complete the compensation study and market wage analysis with a reliable pay plan, thus a comprehensive analysis of the HAY points was needed. The Council authorized this work on November 24, 2008 via Resolution 7365. This work has since been completed and after final refinement, is being brought to the Council for consideration and implementation for 2009. Discussion: Springsted has completed their work associated with the November 24th authorization. All positions’ job descriptions have been reviewed and the HAY points have been reviewed and revised based on standard benchmarking and internal equity. From the revised HAY Points and the previously completed market wage study, a proposed and actual wage table was prepared which includes the following information: • Job Title • Proposed Hay Points • Market Wages (if applicable) • Predicted Pay • Existing Wages For fifteen of the thirty positions, Springsted received reliable market rate salary data. Of those fifteen, five positions presently earn more than the market equivalent and thus no increase would be warranted. The remaining ten positions appear to be under market ranging from 2% to 17%. For the fifteen positions that did not have sufficient reliable market data, the line of best fit was used to determine whether the existing wages were appropriate. Based on the line of best fit, the predicted pay for seven of these positions was higher than the existing pay by less than 1% up to 27%. Four of the fifteen positions earn more than their predicted wage thus no increase would be warranted. One position, the Account Clerk, will need to undergo a “job audit,” which is a more in depth assessment, to ascertain the relevant job duties for purposes of establishing an appropriate wage or verifying that the existing wage is appropriate. The other position which might warrant further study is the now vacant PSO position, which according to the data, appears to be underpaid by 27%. HAY Point Analysis and 2009 Pay Plan December 22, 2008 Page 2 Springsted Observations Market competitiveness. Discontinuation of the DCA Stanton Survey raised the question of how the City would define its market. Defining the market is an important aspect of the Compensation Policy. It is not so much a question of identifying cities that are similar to Mounds View in all characteristics, such as geographic proximity, tax capacity, budget, number of employees, services provided, and where the city is in its development / redevelopment cycle. Rather the objective is to define labor market, i.e. to understand what employees are being paid in similar organizations so that the City of Mounds View can be proactive in attracting and retaining employees. This information gives the City a realistic sense of the labor market in which it operates. The City can then choose whether it wants to set salaries at the market rate or alternatively, pay employees more or less than the market rate. We recommend that the City continue to use the comparable cities identified in our analysis. We specifically recommend that New Brighton and Anoka be added to the list of comparable communities given their geographic proximity and identification by the League of Minnesota Cities’ cluster methodology as metro old growth cities. A weakness of the current compensation policy is that it relies solely on market comparables for each Mounds View position. While some positions are commonly found in all cities, it would be unusual for a city the size of Mounds View to identify an adequate number of comparisons for all of its positions. The policy does not adequately address how pay scales will be developed for positions which do not have comparable positions. Jobs are dynamic; over time they change to address unique circumstances or to meet needs that are considered to be priorities by the governing body. Generally, market salary surveys are conducted using benchmarks that reflect the breadth of the organization from the bottom to the top and across all departments. A pay structure can be developed that allows the City to survey a representative number of positions and to assign those positions for which there is not comparable data to an appropriate pay range based on job evaluation. We recommend creating a classification plan and assigning each position to an appropriate pay grade based on the evaluation of each position. Internal equity. Compensation policies also address equity among the internal pay relationships of its positions. A job evaluation system is used to rate each position based on its skill level and a series of work-related dimensions, such as physical demands, human relations skills, independence of action, and impact of end results. For most organizations, internal equity is integral to its compensation policy. Job evaluation results are considered when assigning positions to a pay range. Structure. The City should give serious consideration to developing a pay plan that assigns positions to specific grades. This structure can be created using the market salary survey and revised job evaluation points. Using both market data and job evaluation data provides a structure that takes into account market and internal equity. A pay plan based on grades has a number of benefits compared to the present system, which ties each position’s pay scale to market comparison. First, market comparisons will not be available for all positions, which means that the pay scales for some positions cannot be determined using market data. Without market data, there is neither a clear nor equitable approach for determining the position’s salary scale. HAY Point Analysis and 2009 Pay Plan December 22, 2008 Page 3 Second, having a pay plan with established pay ranges is easier to administer because it is not dependent on conducting a market survey of all positions every year. Salaries of benchmark positions can be monitored annually to make sure that the City’s pay plan is consistent with its market position. On average, the City should expect to conduct a complete salary survey and job evaluation study every five years or so. Third, in establishing its pay plan, the City can consider its market position. The City can establish a policy to be equal to market, to lead market, or to lag market. On-going administration. The City should expect development of a pay plan based on grades to result in efficient administration of its compensation program, primarily because the City will not have to maintain separate pay scales for each position. Adopting such a pay plan will also result in consistent administration of the City’s compensation program, regardless of whether market data exists for a given position. Implementation Springsted recommends that the market and predicted wage increases be implemented over time rather than all at once. The 2009 budget has already been adopted and the full extent of the wage increases cannot be absorbed in one year without causing significant budgetary consequences. Add to that the uncertainties caused by the State’s budget crisis, the “phasing in” of the recommended increases over time is a fiscally conservative and sensible approach. Staff recommends preparation of a multi-year pay plan that would incorporate a maximum 3% wage increase in 2009 for those positions which, based on the attached wages table, would warrant a market or predicated pay increase. For positions that are observed to be paid in excess of the market or, absent reliable market data, in excess of the predicted wage, the Council may consider adopting a lower cost of living increase in subsequent years, however it would not be my recommendation to do so. In addition to the potential detriment to morale, it would be likely that other cities would eventually catch up with the Mounds View positions in the long term, negating the need for reduced COLA increases. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Resolution 7380, a resolution approving the results of the Springsted salary compensation study and authorizes the preparation of the 2009 pay plan effective January 1, 2009. Respectfully submitted, ________________________ James Ericson Clerk-Administrator RESOLUTION 7380 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE RESULTS OF THE SPRINGSTED SUPPLEMENTAL SALARY COMPENSATION STUDY AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF THE 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PAY PLAN WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has determined that a compensation study and market analysis needs to be prepared and conducted pursuant to Chapter 3.01 of the Personnel Manual; and, WHEREAS, On June 9, 2008, the City Council approved Resolution 7281 authorizing a work plan submitted by Springsted to conduct a compensation study and market analysis; and, WHEREAS, On November 24, 2008, the City Council approved Resolution 7365 authorizing a supplemental work plan with Springsted to review job descriptions and conduct a HAY Point analysis; and, WHEREAS, Springsted completed the supplemental work and provided staff with a proposed and actual wage table, a summary table of HAY point revisions, a regression analysis resulting in a line of best fit and predicted pay, and a comprehensive 2009 pay plan. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View City Council accepts the Springsted HAY Point analysis and authorizes the implementation of the comprehensive 2009 Pay Plan effective January 1, 2009. Adopted this 22nd day of December, 2008. __________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ James Ericson, Clerk-Administrator (seal) Report Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis City of Mounds View December 2008 Project Number 000435-07129-0 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com December 18, 2008 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Re: Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis Client Project No.: Bonestroo File No.: 000435-07129-0 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: In accordance with Resolution #7361, we have completed the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis. This report summarizes our findings from the analysis and presents recommendations for storm sewer system upgrades to improve the performance of the existing system. More specifically, this report identifies how these findings and recommendations impact the current and future Street and Utility Improvement Projects. Thank you for the opportunity to serve the City of Mounds View. If you have any questions regarding the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis, please contact me at (651) 604-4801. Sincerely, BONESTROO Bradley P. Schleeter Joseph R. Rhein Project Manager Client Service Manager I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Bradley P. Schleeter Date: December 18, 2008 Reg. No.: 45013 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW – ARDAN AVENUE DRAINAGE SUBDISTRICT ANALYSIS Table of Contents 1.Background ...........................................................................................................1 2.Introduction...........................................................................................................1 2.1 Analysis Goals ................................................................................................2 3.New storm sewer Analysis and Recommendations......................................................2 3.1 Recommended Storm Sewer Improvements.......................................................3 3.2 Impacts on the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project .......................3 4.Flood Protection Evaluation for Street Low Points.......................................................4 4.1 Low Point South of Sherwood Road and Fairchild Avenue Intersection..................5 4.2 Low Point South of Sherwood Road and Sunnyside Road Intersection...................6 4.3 Low Point South of Sherwood Road and Eastwood Road Intersection....................7 4.4 Low Point North of Sherwood Road and Eastwood Road Intersection....................8 4.5 Low Point at the Knollwood Drive and Ardan Avenue Intersection.........................9 4.6 Low Points on Laport Drive and Redoak Drive, South of Ardan Avenue................10 4.7 Low Point on Fairchild Avenue, North of Ardan Avenue......................................11 4.8 Low Point on Ardan Avenue, West of Redoak Drive...........................................12 4.9 Low Point on Redoak Drive, North of Ardan Avenue..........................................13 4.10 Low Point on Sunnyside Road, North of Ardan Avenue......................................14 4.11 Low Point on Eastwood Road, North of Ardan Avenue.......................................15 4.12 Low Point on Greenwood Drive, North of Ardan Avenue ....................................16 5.Rear Yard Nuisance Flooding Evaluation..................................................................17 6.Cost Estimates .....................................................................................................17 7.Recommendations................................................................................................18 Figures, Tables, and Maps Figure 4.1 - Low Point South of Sherwood Road and Fairchild Avenue Intersection...................5 Figure 4.2 - Low Point South of Sherwood Road and Sunnyside Road Intersection....................6 Figure 4.3 - Low Point South of Sherwood Road and Eastwood Road Intersection ....................7 Figure 4.4 - Low Point North of Sherwood Road and Eastwood Road Intersection.....................8 Figure 4.5 - Low Point at the Knollwood Drive and Ardan Avenue Intersection .........................9 Figure 4.6 - Low Points on Laport Drive and Redoak Drive, South of Ardan Avenue ..................10 Figure 4.7 - Low Point on Fairchild Avenue, North of Ardan Avenue ........................................11 Figure 4.8 - Low Point on Ardan Avenue, West of Redoak Drive..............................................12 Figure 4.9 - Low Point on Redoak Drive, North of Ardan Avenue.............................................13 Figure 4.10 - Low Point on Sunnyside Road, North of Ardan Avenue .......................................14 Figure 4.11 - Low Point on Eastwood Road, North of Ardan Avenue........................................15 Figure 4.12 - Low Point on Greenwood Drive, North of Ardan Avenue .....................................16 Table 6.1 - Cost Estimate Comparison.................................................................................17 Map 1................................................................................................................Appendix B City of Mounds View Page 1 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Report 1.BACKGROUND The Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Report dated March 30, 1989 (“1989 Report”) was prepared for the City as a follow-up to previous reports that identified stormwater improvements aimed at addressing drainage problems identified within the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict. The main purpose of the 1989 Report was …to insure that the Long Lake Road storm sewer has adequate capacity to serve the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict1, as Long Lake Road was scheduled to be reconstructed in 1991. More broadly, the 1989 Report sought to characterize known flooding problems, develop feasible solutions to these problems, estimate costs for the proposed improvements, and address other related issues within the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict. A copy of the 1989 Report is included in Appendix A. The 1989 Report outlined a number of stormwater improvements in the study area between Ardan Avenue and Sherwood Road, and between Knollwood Drive and Long Lake Road to address the known drainage issues in this area. Figures 1-3 in the 1989 Report identify the extents of the study area and the recommended stormwater improvements proposed in the 1989 Report. It should be noted that the stormwater improvements identified in the 1989 Report are not entirely consistent with the recommended improvements from previous reports addressing drainage issues in the study area. The 1989 Report includes a brief discussion regarding why certain stormwater improvements identified prior to the 1989 Report were no longer recommended. Based on the storm sewer design recommendations in the 1989 Report, the utility improvements associated with the reconstruction of Long Lake Road include the recommended 48-inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) stub at the intersection of Long Lake Road and Ardan Avenue. This 48-inch stub was installed to connect to the large diameter trunk storm sewer proposed in Ardan Avenue, per the recommendation of the 1989 Report (see Figure 3 in Appendix A). 2.INTRODUCTION We have performed an initial review of the 1989 Report and essentially confirmed its findings. However, it appears that the stormwater improvements proposed in the 1989 Report may not be warranted to the level being proposed based on the perception of long-time City Staff and residents living in the study area. City Staff recall receiving complaints from residents in this area regarding rear yard nuisance flooding on properties north of Ardan Avenue following heavy rains, however, the improvements proposed in the 1989 Report appear to go well beyond what is necessary to address these rear yard nuisance flooding issues. Other concerns were noted with the 1989 Report as well. The Study assumed that the East Detention Pond (see Figure 3 in Appendix A) would be constructed by a developer. However, under present conditions the City would need to acquire land and construct the pond. This pond cost coupled with cost of storm sewer improvements identified in the 1989 Report represent a significant cost to the City (see Section 6 in this report for cost estimate information). In addition, the 1989 Report improvements would be physically challenging. The proposed pipes are large diameter, and given the existing topography would be extremely shallow, especially on Sherwood Road. It would be very difficult, and perhaps not even possible, to construct the proposed trunk storm sewer as recommended in the 1989 Report. 11989 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Report – Page 1 City of Mounds View Page 2 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 In addition to these facts, the emphasis of storm water management in Mounds View has changed since 1989. Namely, the City has recently indicated a preference for avoiding the acquisition of land and construction of large regional ponds, as was the case with discussions regarding the Spring Creek Regional Pond. 2.1 ANALYSIS GOALS Based on our review of the 1989 Report discussed above, Staff suggested and Council authorized us to perform a new analysis of the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict, which is summarized in this Report (“Report”). The goals of this new analysis are as follows: Goal 1: Eliminate the proposed East Detention Pond and identify an alternate to the Sherwood Road storm sewer proposed in the 1989 Report, while still improving the performance of the existing storm sewer system in the study area. Goal 2: Evaluate the existing level of local flood protection provided for homes adjacent to street low points within the project area. Goal 3: Identify rear yard nuisance flooding issues in the study area. Goal 4: Recommend storm sewer improvements that are more financially feasible than those proposed in the 1989 Report. This new analysis is not done to the level of detail of the 1989 Report. Rather, the intent is to perform a more brief and practical analysis to address the goals identified above. Each goal will be addressed individually in the following sections. 3.NEW STORM SEWER ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The 1989 Report begins with the premise that the drainage problems in the Ardan Avenue area are a result of an undersized storm sewer drainage system. However, the locations of these drainage problems are not specifically identified in the 1989 Report. Based on discussions with long-time City Staff regarding past reports of flooding in the Ardan Avenue area, it is our understanding that these drainage problems can be described as primarily rear yard nuisance flooding in areas north of Ardan Avenue, between Fairchild Avenue and Long Lake Road. To address these drainage problems, the 1989 Report proposed storm sewer improvements in the Ardan Avenue area designed to meet a 5-year Rational Method design standard. Due to limited grade available throughout the Ardan Avenue area, improving the existing storm sewer system to meet a 5-year design standard required substantial storm sewer upsizing in both Ardan Avenue and Sherwood Road. In addition, regional stormwater ponding improvements north of Sherwood Road (East Detention Pond) were necessary to control the increased flow conveyed by the storm sewer improvements in Sherwood Road (see Figure 3 in Appendix A). While a 5-year storm sewer design standard would be ideal for new storm sewer construction; this design standard is not met in older communities throughout the Metro area. Based on our review of the 1989 Report, it is our conclusion that upsizing the existing storm sewer in this area to meet a 5-year design standard does not appear to be warranted for the following reasons: ƒLong-time City Staff indicate that past reports of flooding in the Ardan Avenue area were generally isolated to rear yard areas north of Ardan Avenue, between Fairchild Avenue and Long Lake Road. City of Mounds View Page 3 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 ƒResidents adjacent to street low points are familiar with how the current storm sewer system operates and due to the lack of complaints regarding street flooding in the project area, we presume that residents generally don’t perceive this operation to be a problem. ƒAs is the case with other fully developed communities, the excessive cost of improvements generally becomes the limiting factor when attempting to address local flooding issues by upsizing existing storm sewer systems. ƒIt does not seem to be the most effective use of City resources to improve storm sewer in areas within the project area that haven’t historically reported drainage problems (e.g. along Sherwood Road). ƒThe increase in storm sewer capacity in the Ardan Avenue area doesn’t appear to match the large capital outlay for the improvements. 3.1 RECOMMENDED STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS This new analysis re-examined the improvements identified in the 1989 Report. Following the approach outlined in the previous section of this Report, revised recommendations for storm sewer improvements within the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict are identified. Map 1 in Appendix B presents these recommended storm sewer improvements that address Goal 1 of this analysis. The storm sewer improvements identified on Map 1 in Appendix B do not meet a 5-year storm sewer design standard for the reasons outlined above; however, these improvements were designed to address the following parameters: ƒEliminate the need to construct the proposed East Detention Pond. ƒProvide additional storm sewer conveyance capacity to reasonably address the known drainage issues in the project area, notably the rear yard nuisance flooding reported north of Ardan Avenue. ƒBe designed economically. ƒBe designed to utilize the available capacity of the 48-inch stub at the intersection of Long Lake Road and Ardan Avenue. The storm sewer improvements identified on Map 1 in Appendix B maintain much of the existing trunk storm sewer in the study area. These improvements also follow a design approach along Ardan Avenue similar to the approach identified in the 1989 Report, namely constructing new trunk storm sewer in Ardan Avenue and abandoning the existing storm sewer connections from Ardan Avenue to the existing trunk storm sewer north of Ardan Avenue. This approach, along with the other improvements presented on Map 1 in Appendix B, seeks to address the parameters mentioned above by both increasing the storm sewer conveyance capacity in the study area by adding a proposed trunk storm sewer in Ardan Avenue and reduce the conveyance burden on the existing storm sewer in Sherwood Road and north of Ardan Avenue by abandoning certain connections to these existing sewers. Detailed Ration Method design calculations for both the existing storm sewer system in the study area and the storm sewer improvements recommended in this Report are included in Appendix B. Based on the design parameters identified above, the new storm sewer shown on Map 1 in Appendix B meets roughly a 2-year storm sewer design standard. 3.2 IMPACTS ON THE 2009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT A portion of the study area for this analysis incorporates streets included in the City’s 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project (SUIP), namely Sherwood Road between Groveland Road and Long Lake Road and Redoak Drive from Sherwood Road to north of Ardan Avenue. The 2009-2010 SUIP is currently in the design phase of the project; therefore it is critical that this Report clearly outline how the proposed improvements identified on Map 1 in Appendix B and those in the 1989 Report impact the 2009-2010 SUIP. A summary is as follows: City of Mounds View Page 4 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 ƒThe existing trunk storm sewer in Sherwood Road will not be upsized per the recommendations in the 1989 Report. The proposed improvements identified on Map 1 in Appendix B shows that a portion of the Sherwood Road storm sewer (between Nodes 16 and 33A) will be abandoned in the future, however it will remain in operation until the new trunk connection north of Node 33A on Eastwood Road is provided. ƒThe East Detention Pond will not be constructed per the recommendations in the 1989 Report. ƒThe existing 18” storm sewer between Nodes 29 and 30A in Redoak Drive will be removed and replaced with 21” storm sewer. ƒThe 30” storm sewer between Nodes 30 and 30A in Ardan Avenue proposed in this report will not be constructed at this time, however, the permanent street improvements (subgrade improvements, concrete curb, etc.) along the north side of the Redoak Drive and Ardan Avenue intersection should not be completed with the 2009-2010 SUIP to allow for the future storm sewer crossing. 4.FLOOD PROTECTION EVALUATION FOR STREET LOW POINTS In addition to identifying the storm sewer improvements shown on Map 1 in Appendix B, we also surveyed points at each street low point in the project area to identify the low opening elevations of existing homes and garages adjacent to the street low point and the critical flow path elevation from the street low point. Based on these two elevations, the current level of flood protection provided for these structures was determined. As discussed earlier in this Report, the intent of this analysis is to confirm that the current level of flood protection to low structures will not be compromised by the improvements proposed in this Report and state why we believe that the current level of flood protection to these low structures will increase due to the proposed improvements. There are 13 street low points identified within the project area. Each of these street low points is analyzed individually in this section to address Goal 2 of this analysis, including a figure identifying the street low point location and elevation, the critical flow path elevation, and general overflow direction from the street low point. A location reference box for each figure is included on Map 1 in Appendix B. City of Mounds View Page 5 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 4.1 LOW POINT SOUTH OF SHERWOOD ROAD AND FAIRCHILD AVENUE INTERSECTION Existing Flood Protection Characteristics: ƒOverland area to street low point (Nodes 3 and 4) = 8.2 acres ƒSurveyed critical flow path elevation (circled in blue above) = 910.65 feet ƒSurveyed lowest opening elevation = 913.18 feet (8085 Fairchild Avenue Garage Floor) ƒFlood protection between critical flow path and lowest opening elevations = 2.53 feet ƒExisting downstream conveyance restriction = 18” storm sewer, between Nodes 16 to 33A Proposed Improvements to Increase Flood Protection: ƒAbandon 15” storm sewer between Nodes 13A and 16 Tributary area to the downstream 18” storm sewer is reduced from 30.3 to 15.8 acres 2-year runoff rate to the downstream 18” storm sewer is reduced from 17 to 9 cfs City of Mounds View Page 6 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 4.2 LOW POINT SOUTH OF SHERWOOD ROAD AND SUNNYSIDE ROAD INTERSECTION Existing Flood Protection Characteristics: ƒOverland area to street low point (Nodes 8 and 9) = 7.6 acres ƒSurveyed critical flow path elevation (circled in blue above) = 913.33 feet ƒSurveyed lowest opening elevation = 913.74 feet (8075 Sunnyside Road Garage Floor) ƒFlood protection between critical flow path and lowest opening elevations = 0.41 feet ƒExisting downstream conveyance restriction = 18” storm sewer, between Nodes 16 to 33A Proposed Improvements to Increase Flood Protection: ƒAbandon 15” storm sewer between Nodes 13A and 16 Tributary area to the downstream 18” storm sewer is reduced from 30.3 to 15.8 acres 2-year runoff rate to the downstream 18” storm sewer is reduced from 17 to 9 cfs City of Mounds View Page 7 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 4.3 LOW POINT SOUTH OF SHERWOOD ROAD AND EASTWOOD ROAD INTERSECTION Existing Flood Protection Characteristics: ƒOverland area to street low point (Nodes 10 and 11) = 9.0 acres ƒSurveyed critical flow path elevation (circled in blue above) = 910.47 feet ƒSurveyed lowest opening elevation = 911.41 feet (8099 Eastwood Road Garage Floor) ƒFlood protection between critical flow path and lowest opening elevations = 0.94 feet ƒExisting downstream conveyance restriction = 18” storm sewer, between Nodes 16 to 33A Proposed Improvements to Increase Flood Protection: ƒAbandon 15” storm sewer between Nodes 13A and 16 Tributary area to the downstream 18” storm sewer is reduced from 30.3 to 15.8 acres 2-year runoff rate to the downstream 18” storm sewer is reduced from 17 to 9 cfs ƒConstruct a new 18” storm sewer, north on Eastwood Road between Nodes 13 and 36A Storm sewer conveyance capacity from Sherwood Road to the proposed trunk storm sewer in Ardan Avenue is increased from 5 to 13 cfs City of Mounds View Page 8 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 4.4 LOW POINT NORTH OF SHERWOOD ROAD AND EASTWOOD ROAD INTERSECTION Existing Flood Protection Characteristics: ƒOverland area to street low point (Nodes 12 and 13) = 5.5 acres ƒSurveyed critical flow path elevation (circled in blue above) = 907.49 feet ƒSurveyed lowest opening elevation = 910.65 feet (8111 Eastwood Road Egress Window) ƒFlood protection between critical flow path and lowest opening elevations = 3.16 feet ƒExisting downstream conveyance restriction = 18” storm sewer, between Nodes 16 to 33A Proposed Improvements to Increase Flood Protection: ƒAbandon 15” storm sewer between Nodes 13A and 16 Tributary area to the downstream 18” storm sewer is reduced from 30.3 to 15.8 acres 2-year runoff rate to the downstream 18” storm sewer is reduced from 17 to 9 cfs ƒConstruct a new 18” storm sewer, north on Eastwood Road between Nodes 13 and 36A Storm sewer conveyance capacity from Sherwood Road to the proposed trunk storm sewer in Ardan Avenue is increased from 5 to 13 cfs City of Mounds View Page 9 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 4.5 LOW POINT AT THE KNOLLWOOD DRIVE AND ARDAN AVENUE INTERSECTION Existing Flood Protection Characteristics: ƒOverland area to street low point (Node 21) = 9.1 acres ƒSurveyed critical flow path elevation (circled in blue above) = 909.77 feet to rear yard of 8261 Knollwood Drive ƒSurveyed lowest opening elevation = 909.96 feet (8261 Knollwood Drive Garage Floor) ƒFlood protection between critical flow path and lowest opening elevations = 0.19 feet ƒExisting downstream conveyance restriction = 18” storm sewer, between Nodes 21 and 22 Proposed Improvements to Increase Flood Protection: ƒUpsize existing storm sewer between Nodes 21 and 22 from 18” to 21” Storm sewer conveyance capacity between Nodes 21 and 22 is increased from 5 to 7 cfs Flood Protection Recommendation: ƒIt appears that a berm (top of berm elevation = 911.32) has been constructed along the rear lot lines of 8261 and 8241 Knollwood Drive and the low openings for these homes are 911.0 (Egress Window) and 909.96 (Garage Floor), respectively. It is recommended that with the installation of the Ardan Avenue trunk storm sewer improvements, this berm be lowered/removed to provide adequate flood protection to the adjacent homes. City of Mounds View Page 10 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 4.6 LOW POINTS ON LAPORT DRIVE AND REDOAK DRIVE,SOUTH OF ARDAN AVENUE Existing Flood Protection Characteristics: ƒOverland area to street low point (Nodes 28 and 29) = 2.6 acres (Laport Drive), 6.0 (Redoak Drive) ƒSurveyed critical flow path elevation (circled in blue above) = 908.75 feet (Laport Drive), 906.43 (Redoak Drive) ƒSurveyed lowest opening elevation = 909.63 feet (8200 Redoak Drive Garage Floor) ƒFlood protection between critical flow path and lowest opening elevations = 0.88 feet ƒExisting downstream conveyance restriction = 18” storm sewer, between Nodes 29 to 31 Proposed Improvements to Increase Flood Protection: ƒUpsize existing storm sewer between Nodes 29 and 30A from 18” to 21” Storm sewer conveyance capacity from Node 29 to the proposed trunk storm sewer in Ardan Avenue is increased from 6 to 10 cfs ƒAbandon 18” storm sewer between Nodes 30A and 31 and construct new storm sewer in Ardan Avenue Storm sewer conveyance capacity from Node 30A is increased from 8 to 21 cfs Flood Protection Recommendation: ƒThe existing beehive catch basin rim elevation in the rear of 8200 Redoak Drive is 3.5 feet above the ground in this area. Presumably the rim elevation of this structure was raised to prevent storm sewer flows from surcharging out of this structure and flooding the rear yard areas. It is recommended that with the installation of the Ardan Avenue trunk storm sewer improvements, this rim elevation be lowered to match the adjacent ground elevation. City of Mounds View Page 11 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 4.7 LOW POINT ON FAIRCHILD AVENUE,NORTH OF ARDAN AVENUE Existing Flood Protection Characteristics: ƒOverland area to street low point (Node 26) = 2.2 acres ƒSurveyed critical flow path elevation (circled in blue below) = 907.73 feet ƒSurveyed lowest opening elevation = approximately 908.0 based on 2-foot contours ƒFlood protection between critical flow path and lowest opening elevations = 0.27 feet (estimated) ƒExisting downstream conveyance restriction = 24” storm sewer, downstream of Node 26 Proposed Improvements to Increase Flood Protection: ƒAbandon 18” storm sewer between Nodes 22 and 24 Tributary area to Node 26 is reduced from 35.1 to 15.8 acres 2-year runoff rate from Node 26 is reduced from 21 to 11 cfs City of Mounds View Page 12 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 4.8 LOW POINT ON ARDAN AVENUE,WEST OF REDOAK DRIVE Existing Flood Protection Characteristics: ƒOverland area to street low point (Node 30) = 2.7 acres ƒSurveyed critical flow path elevation (circled in blue above) = 906.29 feet ƒSurveyed lowest opening elevation = 907.14 feet (2749 Ardan Avenue Garage Floor) ƒFlood protection between critical flow path and lowest opening elevations = 0.85 feet ƒExisting downstream conveyance restriction = 15” storm sewer, downstream of Node 30 Proposed Improvements to Increase Flood Protection: ƒUpsize existing storm sewer between Nodes 21 and 22 from 18” to 21” Storm sewer conveyance capacity between Nodes 30 and 30A is increased from 6 to 14 cfs City of Mounds View Page 13 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 4.9 LOW POINT ON REDOAK DRIVE,NORTH OF ARDAN AVENUE Existing Flood Protection Characteristics: ƒOverland area to street low point (Node 31) = 3.5 acres ƒSurveyed critical flow path elevation (circled in blue above) = 908.87 feet ƒSurveyed lowest opening elevation = 909.28 feet (8267 Redoak Drive Garage Floor) ƒFlood protection between critical flow path and lowest opening elevations = 0.41 feet ƒExisting downstream conveyance restriction = 24” storm sewer, downstream of Node 31 Proposed Improvements to Increase Flood Protection: ƒAbandon 18” storm sewer between Nodes 22 and 24, 30A and 31 Tributary area to Node 31 is reduced from 53.0 to 22.4 acres 2-year runoff rate from Node 31 is reduced from 33 to 16 cfs City of Mounds View Page 14 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 4.10 LOW POINT ON SUNNYSIDE ROAD,NORTH OF ARDAN AVENUE Existing Flood Protection Characteristics: ƒOverland area to street low point (Node 33) = 6.4 acres ƒSurveyed critical flow path elevation (circled in blue above) = 908.17 feet ƒSurveyed lowest opening elevation = 908.95 feet (8280 Sunnyside Road Garage Floor) ƒFlood protection between critical flow path and lowest opening elevations = 0.78 feet ƒExisting downstream conveyance restriction = 24” storm sewer, downstream of Node 33B Proposed Improvements to Increase Flood Protection: ƒAbandon 18” storm sewer between Nodes 22 and 24, 30A and 31, 33C and 33B Tributary area to Node 33B is reduced from 99.9 to 28.8 acres 2-year runoff rate from Node 33B is reduced from 51 to 15 cfs City of Mounds View Page 15 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 4.11 LOW POINT ON EASTWOOD ROAD,NORTH OF ARDAN AVENUE Existing Flood Protection Characteristics: ƒOverland area to low point (Node 37) = 5.2 acres ƒSurveyed critical flow path elevation (circled in blue above) = 907.92 feet ƒSurveyed lowest opening elevation = 907.27 feet (8290 Eastwood Road Garage Floor) ƒFlood protection between critical flow path and lowest opening elevations = 0 feet ƒExisting downstream conveyance restriction = 24” storm sewer, downstream of Node 38A Proposed Improvements to Increase Flood Protection: ƒAbandon 18” and 15” storm sewer between Nodes 22 and 24, 30A and 31, 33C and 33B , 36A and 38 Tributary area to Node 38A is reduced from 123.7 to 42.5 acres 2-year runoff rate from Node 38A is reduced from 62 to 19 cfs Flood Protection Recommendation: ƒBased on the survey information collected around Node 37, it appears that once street ponding overflows to the west, flows may enter the garage of 8290 Eastwood Road prior to flowing around the garage to the rear of this lot. As the City has no record of a flooding complaint from this property owner, it is likely that when street ponding occurs, it is contained within the street and not overflowing to the west. When Eastwood Road is reconstructed, this low point should be closely examined to maintain the existing level of flood protection to the existing garage of 8290 Eastwood Road. City of Mounds View Page 16 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 4.12 LOW POINT ON GREENWOOD DRIVE,NORTH OF ARDAN AVENUE Existing Flood Protection Characteristics: ƒOverland area to low point (Node 39) = 4.9 acres ƒSurveyed critical flow path elevation (circled in blue above) = 908.90 feet ƒSurveyed lowest opening elevation = 910.07 feet (8320 Greenwood Drive Garage Floor) ƒFlood protection between critical flow path and lowest opening elevations = 1.17 feet ƒExisting downstream conveyance restriction = 36” storm sewer, downstream of Node 39A Proposed Improvements to Increase Flood Protection: ƒAbandon 18” and 15” storm sewer between Nodes 22 and 24, 30A and 31, 33C and 33B , 36A and 38 Tributary area to Node 39A is reduced from 128.6 to 47.5 acres 2-year runoff rate from Node 39A is reduced from 65 to 22 cfs City of Mounds View Page 17 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 5.REAR YARD NUISANCE FLOODING EVALUATION One of the goals of this new analysis is to identify rear yard nuisance flooding issues in the study area. As stated earlier, City Staff recall receiving complaints from residents regarding rear yard nuisance flooding north of Ardan Avenue following heavy rains. Based on the available 2-foot contour information and the additional survey points taken during this analysis, and to address Goal 3 of this analysis, Map 1 in Appendix B identifies the four rear yard areas north of Ardan Avenue that appear to contain landlocked depressions. With no positive outlet from the bottom of these depressions, drainage flowing into them would remain until it is infiltrated into the ground. It is likely that the rear yard nuisance flooding complaints the City has received in the past relate directly to these landlocked depression areas. As part of the field survey for this analysis, we verified the locations of the existing beehive catch basin structures along the existing 24” trunk storm sewer north of Ardan Avenue, between Fairchild Avenue and Long Lake Road. We were unable to identify existing beehive catch basin structures between Nodes 31 and 33B and Nodes 38A and 39A. It is possible that these structures do exist and were simply not found during the survey. If there are functioning inlets along the existing trunk storm sewer in these locations, large portions of two areas (DA-32 and DA-39.1) identified as landlocked on Map 1 in Appendix B could be positively drained. It is not within the scope of this analysis to develop recommendations to address the rear yard nuisance flooding issues north of Ardan Avenue. However, it is recommended that the City further investigate these rear yard flooding areas, particularly with all four areas adjacent to streets proposed to be reconstructed in the future. It is recommended that further investigation include: ƒInvestigation to determine if beehive catch basin structures do exist along the 24” storm sewer north of Ardan Avenue between Nodes 31 and 33B and Nodes 38A and 39A. ƒDiscussions with property owners in this area to aid in identifying the drainage characteristics of specific landlocked areas. ƒWhether rear yard depression areas have functioning overflows that provide protection to adjacent homes. ƒThe feasibility of providing storm sewer to drain the rear yard depressions. 6.COST ESTIMATES Goal 4 of this analysis is to recommend improvements that meet the other goals of this analysis, but are more financially feasible that the stormwater improvements recommended in the 1989 Report. With previous sections in this Report identifying how the first three goals of this analysis are being met, the following table presents how the costs associated with the improvements identified in the 1989 Report compare to those identified in this Report. Table 6.1: Cost Estimate Comparison Report that Identifies Improvements Estimated Construction Cost1 1989 Report $543,0002,3 1989 Report (adjusted to 2008 dollars)$1,098,0002 2008 Report $406,000 1All estimated construction costs include a 15% contingency 2The 1989 Report did not include costs associated with the construction of the East Detention Pond 3Street and boulevard restoration costs were removed from the estimated construction cost in the 1989 Report City of Mounds View Page 18 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 The total estimated construction cost for all of the improvements identified in the 1989 Report is $688,000 (1989 dollars). However, as noted in Table 6.1, street and boulevard restoration costs were removed from this total cost to allow for a common comparison of construction items between the improvements identified in the 1989 Report and those identified in this Report. Also as noted in Table 6.1, the estimated construction costs from the 1989 Report do not include any costs for the construction of the East Detention Pond. The 1989 Report assumed that this pond would be constructed by a developer building in this area. The additional costs associated with the East Detention Pond would include: land acquisition, pond grading, and a pond outlet. Including these additional costs would significantly increase the estimated construction cost for the 1989 Report. In addition to the improvements recommended in this Report (see Map 1 in Appendix B), the 1989 Report identified other potential future costs associated with the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict improvements. While further investigation into these and other potential future costs is outside of the scope of this analysis, the City should consider the following potential future costs: ƒPerforming a stormwater analysis of the system downstream of the Ardan Avenue storm sewer system to determine if downstream improvements are warranted due to the impact of the Ardan Avenue improvements. ƒIf necessary, the construction of downstream improvements. 7.RECOMMENDATIONS The following is a summary of the recommendations identified in the previous sections of this Report: 1.Construct the storm sewer improvements identified on Map 1 in Appendix A. 2.With the installation of the Ardan Avenue trunk storm sewer improvements, the existing catch basin manhole rim elevation located in the rear yard of 8200 Redoak Drive should be lowered to match the adjacent ground elevation. 3.Further investigation into the rear yard flooding areas identified on Map 1 in Appendix B, with the investigation including: ƒFurther investigation to determine if beehive catch basin structures do exist along the 24” storm sewer north of Ardan Avenue between Nodes 31 and 33B and Nodes 38A and 39A. ƒDiscussions with property owners in this area to aid in identifying the drainage characteristics of specific landlocked areas. ƒWhether rear yard depression areas have functioning overflows that provide protection to adjacent homes. ƒThe feasibility of providing storm sewer to drain the rear yard depressions. 4.Consider the potential future costs associated with improvements recommended in this Report, including: ƒPerforming a stormwater analysis of the system downstream of the Ardan Avenue storm sewer system to determine if downstream improvements are warranted due to the impact of the Ardan Avenue improvements. ƒIf necessary, the construction of downstream improvements. City of Mounds View Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 Appendix A: Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Report March, 1989 City of Mounds View Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 000435-07129-0 Appendix B: Map 1 – Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis Rational Method Worksheets !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 36A33C 16 09 36 29 30A DA-41 DA-42 DA-22 DA-21 DA-34 DA-33.1 DA-39.1 DA-10 DA-9 DA-33 DA-29 DA-25 DA-35 DA-39DA-12 DA-23 DA-36 DA-32 DA-28.1 DA-40 DA-31 DA-37DA-27 DA-24 DA-28.2 DA-40.1 DA-30 DA-28 DA-3 DA-5 DA-27.1 DA-4 DA-26 DA-43DA-1 DA-11DA-38 DA-8DA-2 DA-13DA-15 DA-16 DA-515"18"36" 24"48"30"12" 15"18"15"24" 12" 24"18"15"24" 18" 24" 48"12"18"48"15"15"15"24" 15"24"18"18"24"18"24"15"15"18"48" 30"36"21"42"21"42" 23 40 25 41 42 1312 11 10 08 15 03 04 0502 01 43 39 37 38 35 34 33 31 28 30 27 26 24 22 21 Out 13A 39A 38A 33A 33B 48" StubRED OAK DRIVEEASTWOOD ROADGROVELAND ROADGREENWOOD DRIVEFAIRCHILD AVEFAIRCHILD AVESPRING LAKE ROADSPRING LAKE ROADWOODLAWN DRIVEHI G H W A Y 1 0 HIGHW A Y 1 0 H IG HW A Y 1 0 PLEASANT VIEW DRIVEKNOLLWOOD DRIVEKNOLLWOOD DRIVESUNNYSIDE ROADSUNNYSIDE ROADARDAN AVE ARDAN AVE LAPORT DRIVE LAPORT DRIVE LAPORT DRIVE LONG LAKE ROADLONG LAKE ROADSHERWOOD ROADSHERWOOD ROADRED OAK COURTPLEASANT VIEW COURTGROVELAND COURT 12"12"18" 12"12"12"12" 12" 12"12"15"12" 48"30" K:\435\43507129\GIS\Ardan Ave Drainage Analysis\Map 1.mxd Stormsewer Improvements Replace Existing Stormsewer New Stormsewer Abandon Existing Stormsewer !Stormsewer Node Existing Stormsewer Drainage Area Landlocked Rear Yard Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis Map 1 December 2008 City of Mounds View ¯0 350175 Feet Client:City of Mounds View Proj. No.435-07-129 Storm Sewer Analysis Worksheet - Rational Method Project:Arden Ave Drainage Subdistrict Analysis Prepared By: BPS Design Basis:2 year event Date:12/17/2008 Time Full Time Imperv.of Q - RUNOFF (cfs)Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Flow Pipe In Ground Invert Pipe Ground Invert Pipe From To Area Area %Total Conc.I Slope Dia. Material Capacity Velocity Length Pipe Elev. Elev. Cover Elev. Elev. Cover Point Point (ac.)(ac) Imperv. C CxA CxA (min.) (In/Hr) Direct Pond Total %(in.)(cfs)(fps)(feet) (min.) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) COMMENTS Existing Conditions - Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis 1 2 1.60 0.48 30% 0.34 0.54 0.54 18.3 3.09 1.7 1.7 1.15 12 3.8 4.9 27 0.1 911.30 907.90 2.2 911.29 907.59 2.5 2 5 0.68 0.24 35% 0.38 0.26 0.80 18.4 3.09 2.5 2.5 0.20 12 1.6 2.0 294 2.4 911.29 907.59 2.5 910.81 907.01 2.6 3 4 2.04 0.75 37% 0.40 0.81 0.81 18.2 3.09 2.5 2.5 1.13 12 3.8 4.8 23 0.1 911.02 907.62 2.2 910.86 907.36 2.3 4 5 1.83 0.47 26% 0.30 0.55 1.36 18.3 3.09 4.2 4.2 0.81 15 5.8 4.7 43 0.2 910.86 907.36 2.1 910.81 907.01 2.3 5 redoak 2.02 0.64 32% 0.35 0.72 2.88 20.8 2.95 8.5 8.5 0.39 15 4.0 3.3 533 2.7 910.81 907.01 2.3 914.85 904.95 8.4 redoak 15 0.00 2.88 23.5 2.75 7.9 7.9 0.20 15 2.9 2.3 343 2.5 914.85 904.95 8.4 913.90 904.28 8.2 15 16 0.50 0.22 45% 0.46 0.23 3.11 23.5 2.75 8.5 8.5 0.19 15 2.9 2.3 154 1.1 913.90 904.28 8.2 913.43 903.98 8.0 8 9 1.12 0.38 34% 0.37 0.41 0.41 17.7 3.16 1.3 1.3 1.68 12 4.6 5.9 28 0.1 912.42 907.32 3.9 912.45 906.85 4.4 9 16 5.70 1.07 19% 0.24 1.37 1.79 44.0 1.90 3.4 3.4 1.03 18 10.7 6.0 65 0.2 912.45 906.85 3.9 913.43 906.18 5.6 10 11 7.12 1.35 19% 0.24 1.73 1.73 40.9 1.98 3.4 3.4 0.48 12 2.5 3.1 27 0.1 909.90 907.50 1.2 909.72 907.37 1.2 11 13A 1.89 0.63 33% 0.37 0.69 2.42 41.0 1.96 4.7 4.7 0.16 15 2.6 2.1 173 1.4 909.72 907.37 0.9 911.29 907.09 2.7 12 13 4.82 0.98 20% 0.25 1.22 1.22 38.2 2.04 2.5 2.5 0.78 12 3.1 4.0 27 0.1 911.05 908.07 1.8 911.06 907.86 2.0 13 13A 0.70 0.26 36% 0.39 0.28 1.50 38.3 2.04 3.1 3.1 0.82 12 3.2 4.1 88 0.4 911.06 907.81 2.1 911.29 907.09 3.0 13A 16 0.08 0.00 3.92 42.4 1.93 7.6 7.6 0.16 15 2.6 2.1 558 4.4 911.29 907.09 2.7 913.43 906.18 5.8 16 33A 0.33 0.11 32% 0.36 0.12 8.94 44.2 1.87 16.7 16.7 0.23 18 5.0 2.9 600 3.5 913.43 903.98 7.7 910.60 902.60 6.3 33A 33B 0.00 8.94 47.7 1.79 16.0 2.0 18.0 0.23 18 5.0 2.8 603 3.5 910.60 902.60 6.3 907.07 901.22 4.2 100-yr outflow from basin (Estimated) 21 22 9.10 2.73 30% 0.34 3.08 3.08 42.8 1.93 5.9 5.9 0.20 18 4.7 2.7 498.4 3.1 908.65 905.28 1.7 907.60 904.28 1.6 22 24 10.23 4.31 42% 0.44 4.52 7.60 46.0 1.84 14.0 14.0 0.20 18 4.7 2.7 289 1.8 907.60 904.28 1.6 907.40 903.70 2.0 23 24 0.0 2.7 2.7 0.60 12 2.8 3.5 20 0.1 FES 905.40 NA 907.40 905.28 0.9 100-yr outflow from basin 24 25 2.94 1.23 42% 0.44 1.30 8.90 47.8 1.79 15.9 2.7 18.6 0.19 18 4.5 2.6 16 0.1 907.40 903.70 2.0 907.00 903.67 1.6 25 25.1 5.85 0.32 5%0.13 0.74 9.64 47.9 1.79 17.3 2.7 20.0 0.19 18 4.6 2.6 448 2.9 907.00 903.67 1.6 911.80 902.82 7.3 25.1 26 0.00 9.64 47.9 1.79 17.3 2.7 20.0 0.10 24 7.0 2.2 134 1.0 911.80 902.37 7.2 910.30 902.24 5.8 26 27 2.23 0.86 39% 0.41 0.92 10.55 48.9 1.76 18.6 2.7 21.3 0.10 24 7.2 2.3 325 2.4 910.30 902.24 5.8 904.66 901.91 0.5 27 31 3.05 0.43 14% 0.20 0.62 11.17 51.2 1.68 18.8 2.7 21.5 0.10 24 7.2 2.3 209 1.5 904.66 901.91 0.5 908.00 901.70 4.0 28 29 2.59 1.03 40% 0.42 1.10 1.10 20.2 2.95 3.2 3.2 0.33 12 2.0 2.6 327 2.1 909.00 904.97 2.8 908.23 903.90 3.1 29 30A 5.98 2.99 50% 0.51 3.05 4.15 35.5 2.12 8.8 8.8 0.36 18 6.3 3.6 227 1.1 908.23 903.90 2.6 909.44 903.09 4.7 30 30A 2.73 1.12 41% 0.43 1.19 1.19 21.5 2.89 3.4 3.4 0.83 15 5.9 4.8 218 0.8 907.51 904.89 1.2 909.44 903.09 4.9 30A 31 0.00 5.33 36.5 2.10 11.2 11.2 0.55 18 7.8 4.4 190 0.7 909.44 903.09 4.7 908.59 902.04 4.9 31 32 3.54 1.55 44% 0.46 1.62 18.12 52.7 1.65 29.9 2.7 32.6 0.10 24 7.1 2.3 245 1.8 908.59 901.70 4.6 905.00 901.46 1.3 32 33B 0.00 18.12 54.6 1.59 28.8 28.8 0.10 24 7.2 2.3 235 1.7 905.00 901.46 1.3 907.50 901.22 4.0 33 33B 6.45 2.07 32% 0.36 2.29 2.29 55.1 1.57 3.6 3.6 0.10 15 2.1 1.7 335 3.3 906.80 901.84 3.5 907.50 901.50 4.6 33B 34 0.00 29.34 58.4 1.48 43.4 4.7 48.1 0.11 24 7.6 2.4 266 1.8 907.50 901.22 4.0 902.18 900.92 -1.0 34 38 8.51 0.86 10% 0.17 1.42 30.76 60.2 1.43 44.0 4.7 48.7 0.10 24 7.2 2.3 270 2.0 902.18 900.92 -1.0 908.00 900.65 5.1 35 36A 5.33 3.42 64% 0.63 3.36 3.36 20.0 2.95 9.9 9.9 0.40 12 2.3 2.9 120 0.7 908.10 902.82 4.1 908.51 902.34 5.0 36 36A 4.71 1.31 28% 0.32 1.50 1.50 30.0 2.26 3.4 3.4 0.30 12 2.0 2.5 60 0.4 907.69 902.57 3.9 908.51 902.39 4.9 36A 38 0.00 4.87 30.4 2.26 11.0 11.0 0.14 18 4.0 2.2 189 1.4 908.51 902.27 4.5 908.00 902.00 4.3 38 38A 1.86 0.43 23% 0.28 0.51 36.14 62.2 1.43 51.7 4.7 56.4 0.10 24 7.0 2.2 199 1.5 908.00 900.65 5.1 908.20 900.46 5.5 100-year ponded discharge UPPER MH LOWER MH 100-year ponded discharge Page 1 of 2 Time Full Time Imperv.of Q - RUNOFF (cfs)Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Flow Pipe In Ground Invert Pipe Ground Invert Pipe From To Area Area %Total Conc.I Slope Dia. Material Capacity Velocity Length Pipe Elev. Elev. Cover Elev. Elev. Cover Point Point (ac.)(ac) Imperv. C CxA CxA (min.) (In/Hr) Direct Pond Total %(in.)(cfs)(fps)(feet) (min.) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) COMMENTS UPPER MH LOWER MH 37 38A 3.36 1.36 41% 0.43 1.44 1.44 20.0 2.95 4.3 4.3 0.35 15 3.8 3.1 192 1.0 907.62 902.97 3.2 907.97 902.30 4.2 38A 39A 0.00 37.59 63.7 1.43 53.7 4.7 58.4 0.10 24 7.2 2.3 528 3.9 908.20 900.46 5.5 910.30 899.93 8.1 39 39A 4.91 2.01 41% 0.43 2.12 2.12 20.0 2.95 6.3 6.3 0.47 30 28.1 5.7 362 1.1 907.17 902.17 2.2 910.30 900.47 7.0 39A 40 0.00 39.71 67.6 1.43 56.8 4.7 61.5 0.20 36 30.0 4.2 287 1.1 910.30 899.90 7.0 907.70 899.32 5.0 40 43 4.09 0.49 12% 0.18 0.75 40.45 68.7 1.43 57.8 4.7 62.5 0.27 36 35.0 4.9 422 1.4 907.70 899.32 5.0 906.77 898.16 5.3 41 41A 0.0 8.0 8.0 1.36 15 7.5 6.1 56 0.2 FES 902.06 NA 905.13 901.30 2.4 100-yr outflow from basin 41A 42 0.00 0.00 30.0 2.26 0.0 8.0 8.0 1.36 15 7.5 6.1 56 0.2 FES 902.06 NA 905.13 901.30 2.4 42 48" Stub 11.36 4.94 43% 0.45 5.15 5.15 30.0 2.26 11.6 8.0 19.6 0.37 18 6.4 3.6 620 2.9 905.13 901.30 2.1 905.90 899.00 5.2 48" Stub 43 0.00 5.15 32.9 2.21 11.4 8.0 19.4 0.26 48 72.6 5.8 196 0.6 905.90 898.37 3.1 906.77 897.87 4.5 43 Out 2.09 1.09 52% 0.53 1.11 46.72 70.1 1.43 66.8 12.7 79.5 0.18 48 61.7 4.9 563 1.9 906.77 897.87 4.5 FES 896.83 NA 131.25 42.11 46.72 100-year ponded discharge Page 2 of 2 Client:City of Mounds View Proj. No.435-07-129 Storm Sewer Analysis Worksheet - Rational Method Project:Arden Ave Drainage Subdistrict Analysis Prepared By: BPS Design Basis:2 year event Date:12/18/2008 Time Full Time Imperv.of Q - RUNOFF (cfs)Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Flow Pipe In Ground Invert Pipe Ground Invert Pipe From To Area Area %Total Conc.I Slope Dia. Material Capacity Velocity Length Pipe Elev.Elev. Cover Elev. Elev. Cover Point Point (ac.)(ac) Imperv. C CxA CxA (min.) (In/Hr) Direct Pond Total %(in.)(cfs)(fps)(feet) (min.) (feet)(feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) COMMENTS Ardan Avenue Trunk Improvements 1 2 1.60 0.48 30%0.34 0.54 0.54 18.3 3.09 1.7 1.7 1.15 12 3.8 4.9 27 0.1 911.30 907.90 2.2 911.29 907.59 2.5 2 5 0.68 0.24 35%0.38 0.26 0.80 18.4 3.09 2.5 2.5 0.20 12 1.6 2.0 294 2.4 911.29 907.59 2.5 910.81 907.01 2.6 3 4 2.04 0.75 37%0.40 0.81 0.81 18.2 3.09 2.5 2.5 1.13 12 3.8 4.8 23 0.1 911.02 907.62 2.2 910.86 907.36 2.3 4 5 1.83 0.47 26%0.30 0.55 1.36 18.3 3.09 4.2 4.2 0.81 15 5.8 4.7 43 0.2 910.86 907.36 2.1 910.81 907.01 2.3 5 redoak 2.02 0.64 32%0.35 0.72 2.88 20.8 2.95 8.5 8.5 0.39 15 4.0 3.3 533 2.7 910.81 907.01 2.3 914.85 904.95 8.4 redoak 15 0.00 2.88 23.5 2.75 7.9 7.9 0.20 15 2.9 2.3 343 2.5 914.85 904.95 8.4 913.90 904.28 8.2 15 16 0.50 0.22 45%0.46 0.23 3.11 23.5 2.75 8.5 8.5 0.19 15 2.9 2.3 154 1.1 913.90 904.28 8.2 913.43 903.98 8.0 8 9 1.12 0.38 34%0.37 0.41 0.41 17.7 3.16 1.3 1.3 1.68 12 4.6 5.9 28 0.1 912.42 907.32 3.9 912.45 906.85 4.4 9 16 5.70 1.07 19%0.24 1.37 1.79 44.0 1.90 3.4 3.4 1.03 18 10.7 6.0 65 0.2 912.45 906.85 3.9 913.43 906.18 5.6 16 33A 0.33 0.11 32%0.36 0.12 5.01 44.2 1.87 9.4 9.4 0.23 18 5.0 2.9 600 3.5 908.51 903.98 2.8 910.60 902.60 6.3 33A 33C 0.00 5.01 47.7 1.79 9.0 2.0 11.0 0.23 18 5.0 2.9 407 2.4 910.60 902.60 6.3 907.07 901.66 3.7 100-yr outflow from basin (Estimated), abandon pipe between Nodes 33C and 33B 21 22 9.10 2.73 30%0.34 3.08 3.08 42.8 1.93 5.9 5.9 0.20 21 7.1 2.9 476 2.7 908.65 903.55 3.1 907.60 902.60 3.0 New trunk pipe along Ardan Ave 22 30 10.23 4.31 42%0.44 4.52 7.60 45.5 1.84 14.0 14.0 0.12 30 14.0 2.9 814 4.8 907.60 902.60 2.2 907.40 901.65 3.0 New trunk pipe along Ardan Ave 30 30A 2.73 1.12 41%0.43 1.19 8.79 50.3 1.71 15.0 15.0 0.12 30 14.1 2.9 212 1.2 907.51 901.65 3.1 909.44 901.40 5.2 New trunk pipe along Ardan Ave 28 29 2.59 1.03 40%0.42 1.10 1.10 20.2 2.95 3.2 3.2 0.33 12 2.0 2.6 327 2.1 909.00 904.97 2.8 908.23 903.90 3.1 29 30A 5.98 2.99 50%0.51 3.05 4.15 35.5 2.12 8.8 8.8 0.36 21 9.5 3.9 227 1.0 908.23 903.90 2.3 909.44 903.09 4.4 New trunk pipe along Redoak Dr 30A 33C 0.00 12.93 51.5 1.68 21.7 21.7 0.10 36 20.7 2.9 509 2.9 909.44 901.40 4.7 908.59 900.91 4.3 New trunk pipe along Ardan Ave 33C 35 0.00 17.94 50.1 1.71 30.7 2.0 32.7 0.10 42 31.7 3.3 433 2.2 908.59 900.91 3.8 908.10 900.48 3.7 New trunk pipe along Ardan Ave 35 36A 5.33 3.42 64%0.63 3.36 21.31 52.2 1.65 35.2 2.0 37.2 0.10 42 31.5 3.3 102 0.5 908.10 900.48 3.7 908.51 900.38 4.2 New trunk pipe along Ardan Ave 10 11 7.12 1.35 19%0.24 1.73 1.73 40.9 1.98 3.4 3.4 0.48 12 2.5 3.1 27 0.1 909.90 907.50 1.2 909.72 907.37 1.2 11 13A 1.89 0.63 33%0.37 0.69 2.42 41.0 1.96 4.7 4.7 0.16 15 2.6 2.1 173 1.4 909.72 907.37 0.9 911.29 907.09 2.7 13A 13 0.08 0.00 2.42 42.4 1.93 4.7 4.7 0.60 15 5.0 4.1 88 0.4 911.29 907.09 2.7 911.06 906.56 3.1 Replace existing 12" storm sewer (and reverse flow) with new 15" trunk pipe along Eastwood Rd 12 13 4.82 0.98 20%0.25 1.22 1.22 38.2 2.04 2.5 2.5 0.78 12 3.1 4.0 27 0.1 911.05 908.07 1.8 911.06 907.86 2.0 13 36A 0.70 0.26 36%0.39 0.28 3.92 42.7 1.93 7.6 7.6 0.60 18 8.1 4.6 942 3.4 911.06 906.56 2.8 908.51 900.95 5.9 New 18" trunk pipe along Eastwood Rd 36A 36 0.00 25.23 52.8 1.65 41.6 2.0 43.6 0.10 48 46.0 3.7 78 0.4 908.51 900.38 3.7 907.69 900.30 3.0 New trunk pipe along Ardan Ave 36 48" Stub 4.71 1.31 28%0.32 1.50 26.73 53.1 1.62 43.3 2.0 45.3 0.10 48 45.4 3.6 902 4.2 907.69 900.30 3.0 905.90 899.40 2.1 New trunk pipe along Ardan Ave, Existing 48" stub invert = 899.4 = Modifications/improvements to existing trunk storm sewer UPPER MH LOWER MH 100-year ponded discharge Existing Sherwood Road Trunk Stormsewer Proposed Ardan Avenue Trunk Stormsewer Page 1 of 2 Time Full Time Imperv.of Q - RUNOFF (cfs)Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Flow Pipe In Ground Invert Pipe Ground Invert Pipe From To Area Area %Total Conc.I Slope Dia. Material Capacity Velocity Length Pipe Elev.Elev. Cover Elev. Elev. Cover Point Point (ac.)(ac) Imperv. C CxA CxA (min.) (In/Hr) Direct Pond Total %(in.)(cfs)(fps)(feet) (min.) (feet)(feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) COMMENTS UPPER MH LOWER MH 23 24 0.0 2.7 2.7 0.60 12 2.8 3.5 20 0.1 FES 905.40 NA 907.40 905.28 0.9 100-yr outflow from basin 24 25 2.94 1.23 42%0.44 1.30 1.30 22.4 2.82 3.7 2.7 6.4 0.19 18 4.5 2.6 16 0.1 907.40 903.70 2.0 907.00 903.67 1.6 25 25.1 5.85 0.32 5%0.13 0.74 2.04 22.5 2.82 5.7 2.7 8.4 0.19 18 4.6 2.6 448 2.9 907.00 903.67 1.6 911.80 902.82 7.3 25.1 26 0.00 2.04 22.5 2.82 5.7 2.7 8.4 0.10 24 7.0 2.2 134 1.0 911.80 902.37 7.2 910.30 902.24 5.8 26 27 2.23 0.86 39%0.41 0.92 2.95 23.5 2.75 8.1 2.7 10.8 0.10 24 7.2 2.3 325 2.4 910.30 902.24 5.8 904.66 901.91 0.5 27 31 3.05 0.43 14%0.20 0.62 3.57 25.9 2.61 9.3 2.7 12.0 0.10 24 7.2 2.3 209 1.5 904.66 901.91 0.5 908.00 901.70 4.0 31 32 3.54 1.55 44%0.46 1.62 5.18 27.4 2.47 12.8 2.7 15.5 0.10 24 7.1 2.3 245 1.8 908.59 901.70 4.6 905.00 901.46 1.3 32 33B 0.00 5.18 29.2 2.33 12.1 2.7 14.8 0.10 24 7.2 2.3 235 1.7 905.00 901.46 1.3 907.50 901.22 4.0 33 33B 6.45 2.07 32%0.36 2.29 2.29 55.1 1.57 3.6 3.6 0.10 15 2.1 1.7 335 3.3 906.80 901.84 3.5 907.50 901.50 4.6 33B 34 0.00 7.48 58.4 1.48 11.1 2.7 13.8 0.11 24 7.6 2.4 266 1.8 907.50 901.22 4.0 902.18 900.92 -1.0 34 38 8.51 0.86 10%0.17 1.42 8.89 60.2 1.43 12.7 2.7 15.4 0.10 24 7.2 2.3 270 2.0 902.18 900.92 -1.0 908.00 900.65 5.1 38 38A 1.86 0.43 23%0.28 0.51 9.41 62.2 1.43 13.5 2.7 16.2 0.10 24 7.0 2.2 199 1.5 907.69 900.65 4.8 908.20 900.46 5.5 37 38A 3.36 1.36 41%0.43 1.44 1.44 20.0 2.95 4.3 4.3 0.35 15 3.8 3.1 192 1.0 907.62 902.97 3.2 907.97 902.30 4.2 38A 39A 0.00 10.85 63.7 1.43 15.5 2.7 18.2 0.10 24 7.2 2.3 528 3.9 908.20 900.46 5.5 910.30 899.93 8.1 39 39A 4.91 2.01 41%0.43 2.12 2.12 20.0 2.95 6.3 6.3 0.47 30 28.1 5.7 362 1.1 907.17 902.17 2.2 910.30 900.47 7.0 39A 40 0.00 12.97 67.6 1.43 18.6 2.7 21.3 0.20 36 30.0 4.2 287 1.1 910.30 899.90 7.0 907.70 899.32 5.0 40 43 4.09 0.49 12%0.18 0.75 13.72 68.7 1.43 19.6 2.7 22.3 0.27 36 35.0 4.9 422 1.4 907.70 899.32 5.0 906.77 898.16 5.3 41 42 0.0 8.0 8.0 1.36 15 7.5 6.1 56 0.2 FES 902.06 NA 905.13 901.30 2.4 100-yr outflow from basin 42 48" Stub 11.36 4.94 43%0.45 5.15 5.15 30.0 2.26 11.6 8.0 19.6 0.37 18 6.4 3.6 620 2.9 905.13 901.30 2.1 905.90 899.00 5.2 48" Stub 43 0.00 31.89 57.3 1.51 48.2 10.0 58.2 0.26 48 72.6 5.8 196 0.6 905.90 898.37 3.1 906.77 897.87 4.5 43 Out 2.09 1.09 52%0.53 1.11 46.72 70.1 1.43 66.8 12.7 79.5 0.18 48 61.7 4.9 563 1.9 906.77 897.87 4.5 FES 896.83 NA 131.25 42.11 46.72 100-year ponded discharge Existing Trunk Stormsewer North of Ardan Avenue and Long Lake Road 100-year ponded discharge Page 2 of 2 Item No: 7B Meeting Date: December 22, 2008 Type of Business: CB Administrator Review: _____ City of Mounds View Staff Report To:Honorable Mayor and City Council From:Joe Rhein, Consulting Engineer Item Title/Subject:Resolution 7381 Approving The Findings Of The Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis Background: On March 24, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7243 ordering the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project. In 1989 a Report had been performed on the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict (1989 Drainage Report), which identified proposed trunk storm sewer improvements that would impact the project area of the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project. On November 24, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7361 authorizing a new analysis to be performed of the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict (2008 Drainage Report). The purpose of the new 2008 Drainage Report would be to identify alternatives to the improvements proposed in the 1989 Drainage Report. Discussion: As noted in the Staff Report for November 24th, the 1989 Drainage Report proposed a new east-west trunk storm sewer along Ardan Avenue, a new storm sewer along Sherwood Road, and a new regional storm water pond, called the “East Detention Pond”, located north of the intersection of Sherwood Road and Greenwood Drive. A figure from the 1989 Report showing these facilities is included with this Staff Report for reference. Concerns over the proposed improvements in the 1989 Drainage Report included high cost, physical challenges, the need to acquire land for the pond, and the concept of constructing a regional pond. In general, the goals of the new 2008 Drainage Report were to determine whether the improvements from the 1989 Drainage Report were necessary, or if an alternative could be identified that would eliminate the regional pond and trunk storm sewer on Sherwood Road, while still increasing the efficiency of the storm sewer system. December 22, 2008 Item No. 7B Page 2 Bonestroo has completed the new 2008 Drainage Report in accordance with Resolution 7361. A copy of the 2008 Drainage Report is included with this Staff Report, along with select pages from the 1989 Drainage Report for comparison. Complete hard copies of the bound 2008 Drainage Report, which includes the entire 1989 Drainage Report as an appendix, are on file at City Hall and are available for review if desired. Findings of the 2008 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis The overall findings of the 2008 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis include the following: x The East Detention Pond proposed in the 1989 Drainage Report is not necessary x The Sherwood Road trunk storm sewer proposed in the 1989 Drainage Report is not necessary x Alternate improvements are possible to the storm sewer system. Features of the alternate improvements include: - Lower cost than the improvements proposed in the 1989 Drainage Report - Less physical impact than the improvements in the 1989 Drainage Report - Increased efficiency in comparison to the existing storm sewer system - Flood protection characteristics of each street low point will be improved through either a reduction in drainage area being conveyed at that location or an increase in the storm sewer pipe size and capacity x Isolated rear yard land locked areas do exist within the analysis area. - Further investigation would be necessary to determine the extent of the existing conditions and what options are available to address the situation. Impact on the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project The 2008 Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis also identified the impact of the storm sewer system improvements on the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project. The impacts are summarized as follows: x No new trunk storm sewer needs to be installed along Sherwood Road x No new regional pond needs to be constructed x A segment of existing storm sewer on Red Oak Drive south of Ardan Avenue needs to be replaced with new, larger diameter pipe x A future trunk storm sewer will be required on Ardan Avenue. The limits of the permanent street improvements performed to Red Oak Drive on the north side of Ardan Avenue should be located to allow the future pipe. December 22, 2008 Item No. 7B Page 3 Cost Estimates The following table shows a comparison between the estimated construction cost for the improvements identified in the 1989 Drainage Report versus the 2008 Drainage Report. Total Estimated Cost Of Improvements 1989 Drainage Report $1,098,000 1, 2 2008 Drainage Report $406,000 1 – The costs from the 1989 Report have been inflated for comparison 2 – The costs from the 1989 Report do not include costs for the land acquisition or construction of the East Detention Pond. From the table it can be seen that the alternative improvements proposed by the new 2008 Drainage Report are estimated to cost much less than the improvements proposed by the 1989 Drainage Report. Cost Impact on the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Program: - The replacement of the segment of storm sewer on Red Oak Drive south of Ardan Avenue has an estimated construction cost of $10,900 Recommendation: Resolution 7381 has been prepared to accept the Report on the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis, approve its findings, and plan for the incorporation of the identified improvements. The Resolution is attached to this Staff Report for consideration by the City Council. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 7381. Respectfully submitted, Joseph R. Rhein, Consulting Engineer Attachments: - Resolution 7381 - Report: Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis – December 2008 RESOLUTION 7381 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING THE FINDINGS OF THE ARDAN AVENUE DRAINAGE SUBDISTRICT ANALYSIS WHEREAS, a drainage study of the Ardan Avenue area was performed in the “Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict” study dated Mar. 30, 1989 (1989 Study); and WHEREAS, the 1989 Study proposed new trunk storm sewers along both Ardan Avenue and Sherwood Road, as well as creation of a new regional storm water detention pond; and WHEREAS, the improvements proposed by the 1989 Study would impact the area of the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, for several reasons the City of Mounds View has interest in investigating whether there is an acceptable alternative to the improvements proposed by the 1989 Study; and WHEREAS, Bonestroo is the consulting engineer for the City on both the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project and the Local Surface Water Management Plan; and WHEREAS, on November 24, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7361 authorizing Bonestroo to perform an analysis of the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict; and WHEREAS, Bonestroo has completed the analysis and has presented the findings to the City Council in a written report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows: 1.The Report on the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis performed by Bonestroo is hereby accepted, and the findings of the Report are hereby approved. 2.The improvements recommended in the Report that fall within the scope of the Street and Utility Improvement Program will be incorporated into the projects of the Program as appropriate. Resolution 7381 Page 2 3.The improvements recommended in the Report that fall outside the scope of the Street and Utility Improvement Program will be identified and included in the Local Surface Water Management Plan for consideration of future action. Adopted this 22nd day of December 2008. ____________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor (ATTEST) ____________________________________ James Ericson, Clerk–Administrator (SEAL) Item No: 7C Meeting Date: December 22, 2008 Type of Business: CB Administrator Review: _____ City of Mounds View Staff Report To:Honorable Mayor and City Council From:Joe Rhein, Consulting Engineer Item Title/Subject:Resolution 7382 Approving The Plans And Specifications, Setting the Bid Date, And Authorizing the Advertisement For Bids For The 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project: Background: On May 22, 2006 the City Council adopted Resolution 6823 authorizing preparation of a Feasibility Report for the 2007-2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project. On December 11, 2006 the City Council held a Public Hearing on the 2007-2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project and adopted Resolution 6982 approving the Feasibility Report. On February 12, 2007 the City Council adopted Resolution 7018 approving the sufficiency of petition in opposition to the 2007-2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project. The 2007-2008 Project was thus suspended. On October 22, 2007 the City Council adopted Resolution 7176 establishing the Street and Utility Program. The Program includes nine Street and Utility Improvement Projects to be constructed over a ten year period, beginning in 2009 and ending in 2018. On February 11, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7223 establishing the Streets and Utilities Committee, to ensure that the Street and Utility Improvement Program was implemented as adopted, and to advise and provide recommendations to the City Council on design and financing issues encountered. On March 24, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7243 ordering the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project, the first project of the Street and Utility Improvement Program. The area for the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project is identical to the former 2007-2008 Project, with the addition of Red Oak Drive from Sherwood Road to Long Lake Road. December 22, 2008 Item No. 7C Page 2 Discussion: Project Development The Streets and Utilities Committee held their first meeting on April 21, 2008. From that date until the present, Staff has worked in coordination with the Committee and the City Council to identify and address issues regarding the overall Street and Utility Improvement Program and the specific 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project. This included development of the new Stormwater Infiltration Program (SIP), and the holding of two public meetings – the first on June 14, 2008 regarding various design issues of the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project, and the second on July 15, 2008 regarding the proposed SIP. The project development activities resulted in a number of resolutions being adopted by the City Council. The following table summarizes these resolutions: Resolution No.Date Description 7307 7-28-08 Various Design Issues on the 2009-2010 SUIP 7319 8-11-08 Establish components of the Stormwater Improvement Program (SIP) 7327 8-25-08 Additional Design Issues on Red Oak Drive and Hillview Road 7328 8-25-08 Establish parameters for SIP Appeal Process 7336 9-22-08 Traffic Calming on Red Oak Drive 7338 9-22-08 Policy for Non-conforming Driveways 7348 10-27-08 Red Oak Drive Lane Configuration south of Hillview Road 7349 10-27-08 Laport Drive and Edgewood Drive Intersection 7352 11-10-08 Consider Appeals to SIP for 2009-2010 Project 7359 11-24-08 Sidewalk along Red Oak Drive south of Hillview Road 7360 11-24-08 Amending Res. 7307 with regard to parking along Hillview Road and Greenwood Drive Plans and Specifications Plans and specifications for the project have been prepared. The full set of plans is 81 pages long. Two complete sets of plans have been provided to City Staff, and are available at City Hall for review if desired. In the interest of length, only relevant sheets from the plan set have been attached to this Staff Report for City Council review. The plans are in general accordance with the original Feasibility Report for the 2007-2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project, including modifications per all subsequent resolutions noted in the previous table. However, there are a few noteworthy modifications to the project that occurred outside of the resolutions listed above during the detailed final design phase of the project plans. A summary of these changes is as follows: December 22, 2008 Item No. 7C Page 3 x Infiltration Basins: The original 2007-2008 Feasibility Report prepared in December 2006 had laid out the preliminary approach to stormwater infiltration, based on an anticipated change in the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) rules. RCWD did in fact adopt their new rules on February 13, 2008. In response to the new RCWD rules, and recognizing their large impact on the overall Street and Utility Improvement Program, the City developed the SIP during the summer of 2008. The components of the SIP were based on compliance with the approved RCWD rules, and were adopted via Resolution 7319 on August 11, 2008. Although RCWD had adopted their new rules in February, they continued work throughout the summer and fall of 2008 on developing standardized tools, including calculation worksheets, to apply the new rules to project permit submittals. RCWD also experienced change in Staff and consultants during this time, slowing progress on the development of these tools. It was critical that the City receive clear direction for applying the rules to the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project, so the process could be used with consistency throughout the remaining projects in the overall Program. Therefore, we maintained frequent communication with RCWD Staff and Consultants regarding the calculation methods and permit application tools. The final direction from RCWD in regard to the required calculations and permit application tools was received by the City on October 30, 2008. However, in order to keep the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project on schedule and allow time for the SIP appeal process, the proposed locations of infiltration features needed to be identified by the end of September. The locations were determined based on initial feedback from RCWD on preliminary calculations performed by the City. Based on those preliminary calculations, a total of 117 features were identified, affecting 104 properties. Notifications were sent to those affected properties on September 26, 2008. The final direction from RCWD in late October on the application of the rules included a much broader approach to the infiltration calculations. Based on these final calculations, it was possible to reduce the number of infiltration features on the project. Those basins that were in the best locations, provided the most benefit, and had the best construction characteristics were kept in the project. Those eliminated were the ones located in less desirable locations from a drainage standpoint, those providing smaller volumes, and those which would have been more difficult to construct. December 22, 2008 Item No. 7C Page 4 The final list of features for the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project provided in the RCWD permit application included only 64 infiltration basins. The permit application has been reviewed and accepted by the RCWD Staff, and received conditional approval (CAPROC) at the December 10, 2008 RCWD Board meeting. Therefore the City can be fairly confident that no further revisions to the list of infiltration features will be needed. Included with this Staff Report are figures showing the 117 infiltration features included on the preliminary list from the September notifications. On those figures, the features that have been able to be removed from the list are also indicated. It should be noted no preferential treatment was given to those properties that had appealed the SIP. All features were reviewed on the equal basis of the criteria noted above. Of the four properties who appealed the SIP, one property had its infiltration feature removed. Staff feels it is still appropriate and important that the SIP continue to be applied on the criteria established for the program, to maintain objective views on the matter. The figures included with this Staff Report indicate those properties that had submitted an appeal to the SIP. Finally, it should also be noted that in addition to reducing the number of infiltration basins needed, the final direction received from RCWD also allowed the depth of the basins to be reduced from 12-inches to 6-inches. This is shown on C1.03 of the plans, included with this Staff Report. The reduction in the number and depth of the infiltration basins resulted in an estimated construction cost savings of approximately $60,000 for the project. x Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis: The Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict Analysis was authorized by the City Council on November 24, 2008 under Resolution 7361. The complete results of the Analysis are being presented to the Council under a separate agenda item at the December 22, 2008 meeting. The findings included one recommended storm sewer improvement to be included in the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project that had not been addressed previously: - The existing storm sewer on Red Oak Drive from Ardan Avenue to approximately 225-feet south is recommended to be removed and be replaced with a larger diameter pipe. This recommendation has been incorporated into the final plan, and is shown on plan sheet C5.02-S included with this Staff Report. - The estimated construction cost of this storm sewer = $10,900 December 22, 2008 Item No. 7C Page 5 x Hillview Road Storm Sewer: The Design Team from Bonestroo met with the City Public Works Staff on December 10, 2008 to review the final plans. The Public Works Staff had a number of minor detailed comments which have since been incorporated into the plan. However, the Public Works Staff also indicated a history of drainage problems at the intersection of Hillview Road and Fairchild Avenue. After investigation, it was determined to be possible to extend storm sewer along Hillview Road from Red Oak Drive to Fairchild Avenue, to improve the drainage at that location. - This improvement has been included in the final plan, and is shown on plan sheet C5.09 included with this Staff Report. - The estimated construction cost of this storm sewer = $14,100 x Sanitary Sewer and Water Service Lines: The construction plans include provisions for a small amount of work on sanitary sewer and water service lines. The provisions allow for repair or replacement of existing sanitary sewer service lines that may be identified during the course of the work. It also allows for the installation of new sanitary sewer and water service lines in the instance where a potential lot split is identified. It should be noted that there is no utility service work currently planned in the project. These items have been included in the plan so that prices are obtained through the bidding process. This eliminates the need to negotiate prices if this work is encountered during the construction. The sanitary sewer and water services are owned by each individual property owner. Therefore it should also be noted that any utility service work performed would be done at the request of the private property owner, and would also be at their sole expense. There would be no cost to the City for utility service work. The estimated construction cost of the sanitary sewer and water service line work included in the construction project is approximately $37,500. x Silver Lake Woods (Lake Court Drive & Lake Court Circle): The City Council ordered the public improvements and authorized the preparation of plans and specifications for Lake Court Drive and Lake Court Circle under Resolution 7353 on November 10, 2008. The Staff Report for that item had indicated that the most efficient and cost effective way to accomplish the improvements would be to combine them in the construction contract for the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project. December 22, 2008 Item No. 7C Page 6 - These improvements have been included in the final plans. It should be noted that all costs for the improvements are being paid by the Silver Lake Woods Condominium Association. There is no additional cost to the City due to the inclusion of these improvements in the construction contract with the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project. Cost Estimate Detailed cost estimates have been prepared for the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project based on the construction plans. Copies of the cost estimate are included with this Staff Report. Also included is a cover letter from Bonestroo that provides a detailed comparison of the current construction cost estimate to the previous estimates. The previous estimates were taken from either original 2007-2008 Feasibility Report or through preliminary estimates provided to the Streets and Utilities Committee and City Council in consideration of the supplemental project issues during the recent development of the project. A brief summary of the estimated construction costs for the project is shown in the following table: 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project Summary of Estimated Construction Cost Item Previous Estimate Current Estimate State Aid Streets $1,314,100 $1,331,500 All Other City Streets 3,146,800 3,085,300 Total – City Streets $4,460,900 $4,416,800 Silver Lake Woods Streets $237,000 $238,200 Total Project Construction Cost $4,697,900 $4,655,000 From the previous table, it can be seen that the current estimated total costs for the construction of the City streets in the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement is $44,100 less than the previous estimated total ($4,460,900 - $4,416,800). This is approximately 1% of the total estimated construction cost of the work. While the total estimated construction costs are very close, there are larger variations within individual parts of the project. This is shown in the construction cost breakdown included with the letter from Bonestroo. Most notably, the current estimated cost of the stormwater improvements is significantly lower than the previous estimates provided in the Feasibility Report, as described previously. December 22, 2008 Item No. 7C Page 7 Conversely, the current estimated utility cost is higher than the estimates in the Feasibility Report. This is primarily due to the addition of storm sewer that was also described previously in this Staff Report, such as the segment on Red Oak Drive (identified by the Ardan Avenue Drainage Analysis) or the segment on Hillview Road identified by the Public Works Staff. Permits and Approvals As noted previously under the discussion on Infiltration Basins, the application for the RCWD permit has already been applied for and has received conditional approval (CAPROC) by the RCWD Board. The conditions on the approval are all relatively minor. No complications are anticipated in obtaining the permit. Staff has also been in frequent contact with both Ramsey County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation in regard to the project. No complications are anticipated in obtaining the necessary permits and approvals from these agencies. Easements In the course of preparing the detailed construction plans, Staff identified only one temporary construction easement that will be required for the project. This is for the construction of the concrete sidewalk along the east side of Red Oak Drive, south of Hillview Road. A temporary construction easement is also needed from that same property for construction of the County Road 10 Trail Segments 1-5 Project. Staff has reviewed the easement needs for both projects with the property owner, and anticipates that the easements will be secured by approximately February 1, 2009. No direct cost for the easement is anticipated. Advertise for Bids Per state statute, with an estimated contract amount in excess of $100,000, the project must be advertised for competitive bidding of the construction contract. Publication of the advertisement must be made at least 21 days before the time and date of the bid opening. The advertisement must be published in both the official City newspaper and in a trade publication or newspaper that is published in a first class City. Project Schedule The detailed schedule for this project has been updated to indicate the activities completed to date as well as the estimated dates for upcoming project events. A copy of the updated schedule is provided with this Staff Report. It can be seen from the schedule that the bid date is proposed for January 29, 2009, which is one week later than when the original schedule was prepared at the time the project was ordered. However, it is still currently anticipated to award the construction contract on February 9, 2009, which is in keeping with the original schedule. All subsequent project activities are also anticipated per the original schedule. December 22, 2008 Item No. 7C Page 8 A listing of the major upcoming project milestones is given below: December 22, 2008 City Council Approves Plans and Specs, Sets Bid Date, and Authorizes Ad for Bid January 29, 2009 Bids Received (Thursday 2:00 P.M., Mounds View City Hall) February 9, 2009 Construction Contract Awarded March 26, 2009 Neighborhood Preconstruction Meeting May 2009 Construction Begins Recommendation: Resolution 7382 has been prepared in accordance with the previous discussion. The Resolution is attached to this Staff Report for consideration by the City Council. Note that the Resolution provides for the approval of the plans and specifications for both the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project as well as the public improvements to Lake Court Drive and Lake Court Circle, and for the combining of the improvements under a single construction contract to be referred to as the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 7382, approving the plans and specifications for the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement, setting the bid date, and authorizing Staff to place the ad for bid for the project. Respectfully submitted, Joseph R. Rhein, Consulting Engineer Attachments: - Resolution 7382 - Updated Schedule: 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project - Cover Letter From Bonestroo (Dec. 18, 2008), including project cost breakdown - Engineer’s Estimate of Project Cost - Infiltration Feature Location Maps – Updated Dec. 12, 2008 - Select Sheets from the Project Construction Plans (15 Sheets) RESOLUTION 7382 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, SETTING THE BID DATE, AND AUTHORIZING THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, on May 22, 2006 the City Council adopted Resolution 6823 ordering the Feasibility Report for the 2007-2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2006 the City Council held a Public Hearing and adopted Resolution 6982 approving the Feasibility Report for the 2007-2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2007 the City Council adopted Resolution 7018 approving the sufficiency of petition in opposition to the 2007-2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, on March 12, 2007 the City Council adopted Resolution 7045 establishing the Streets and Utilities Task Force; and WHEREAS, on October 22, 2007 the City Council adopted Resolution 7176 approving the Street and Utility Improvement Program based on the recommendations of the Streets and Utilities Task Force; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7223 establishing the Streets and Utilities Committee; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7245 appointing members to the Streets and Utilities Committee; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 2008 the City Council held a Public Hearing and adopted Resolution 7243 ordering the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project, based on the Feasibility Report for the 2007-2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project, with the addition of Red Oak Drive north of Sherwood Road; and WHEREAS, one of the duties of the Streets and Utilities Committee is to review non-standard issues for projects within the Street and Utility Improvement Program and make recommendation to the City Council; and Resolution 7382 Page 2 WHEREAS, on July 28, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7307 approving various preliminary design issues on the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project including non-standard street widths, parking lanes, pedestrian corridors, and the access to County Road 10; and WHEREAS, on August 11, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7319 establishing the components of the Program to install infiltration features (later referred to as the Stormwater Infiltration Program) in conjunction with the Street and Utility Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, on August 25, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7327 approving additional design issues regarding Red Oak Drive and Hillview Road in the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, on August 25, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7328 establishing the appeal parameters for the Stormwater Infiltration Program; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7336 approving traffic calming elements on Red Oak Drive in the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7338 approving the policy to address non-conforming driveways within the Street and Utility Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, on October 27, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7348 approving the lane configuration of Red Oak Drive south of Hillview Road in the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, on October 27, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7349 approving the configuration for the intersection of Laport Drive and Edgewood Drive in the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7352 considering the appeals received for the application of the Stormwater Infiltration Program on the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, on November 24, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7359 approving the location of sidewalk along Red Oak Drive south of Hillview Road in the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, on November 24, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7360 amending Resolution 7307 in regard to parking along Hillview Road and Greenwood Drive in the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project; and Resolution 7382 Page 3 WHEREAS, on November 24, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7361 authorizing analysis of the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict to update findings from a previous 1989 Study and determine the impact on the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, on December 22, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7381 approving the findings of the Ardan Avenue Subdistrict Drainage Study; and WHEREAS,plans and specifications for the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project have been prepared in general accordance with the original Feasibility Report and all subsequent Resolutions as noted above; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7353 ordering the public improvements for Lake Court Drive and Lake Court Circle; and WHEREAS, plans and specifications for the improvements to Lake Court Drive and Lake Court Circle have been prepared; and WHEREAS, the most efficient and economical means of proceeding with the public improvements for Lake Court Circle and Lake Court Drive is to combine those improvements with the improvements for the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project under a single construction contract; and WHEREAS,the estimated construction cost of the project is in excess of $100,000 based on the plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, as per state statute, with an estimated contract amount in excess of $100,000, publication must be made at least three weeks before the last day to submit bids; and WHEREAS,it is the intention of the City to utilize Municipal State Aid Construction Funds for the designated State Aid routes within the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project; and WHEREAS,approval of the plans and specifications must also be received from the Minnesota Department of Transportation prior to the receipt of bids for the project; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows: 1.The plans and specifications for the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project, which were prepared pursuant to Resolution 7243, are hereby approved as the plans and specifications in accordance with which said improvements shall be constructed. Resolution 7382 Page 4 2.The plans and specifications for the public improvements to Lake Court Drive and Lake Court Circle, which were prepared pursuant to Resolution 7353, are hereby approved as the plans and specifications in accordance with which said improvements shall be constructed. 3.The plans and specifications for the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project and Lake Court Drive and Lake Court Circle are hereby combined for construction under a single construction contract, to be referred to as the “2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project”. 4.The time and date for receipt of bids for said improvements is hereby established as 2:00 P.M. on January 29, 2009. 5.Staff is hereby directed to cause to be published in the official City newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin, at least three weeks before the last day to submit bids, a notice to bidders for the implementation of said project as required by law. 6.Staff is hereby directed to proceed with all activities necessary for the procurement of Municipal State Aid Funds for the improvements to be constructed along the designated State Aid routes within the Project. Adopted this 22nd day of December 2008. ____________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor (ATTEST) ____________________________________ James Ericson, Clerk-Administrator (SEAL) Infrastructure Improvement Program 2009 – 2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project Action Plan and Schedule Prepared March 14, 2008 Revised / Updated: December 17, 2008 May 22, 2006 City Council authorized preparation of as feasibility report for the 2007- 2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project December 11, 2006 City Council approved the feasibility report for the 2007-2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project January 31, 2007 Strom Water Enhancement Meeting – introduced proposed raingarden plan for the 2007-2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project February 12, 2007 City Council accepted a petition ion opposition to the proposed 2007- 2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project August 13, 2007 City Council authorized preparation of an updated feasibility report for the 2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project August 30, 2007 Public Information Meeting on the 2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project September 10, 2007 Work on the 2008 Street and Utility Improvement Project is terminated October 8, 2007 The City Council made a motion to authorize Staff to initiate preparation of a 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project by working with the engineering consultant to collect data, mainly on Red Oak Drive north of Sherwood Drive, and to initiate the development of a raingarden program. October 22, 2007 The City Council adopted the Street and Utility Improvement Program. March 10, 2008 City Council sets a Public Hearing Date for the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project March 12, 2008 Public Hearing notice published on City’s web site March 19, 2008 Public Hearing notice published in official newspaper March 24, 2008 Public Hearing, Order Project, authorize preparation of plans and specifications April 21, 2008 First Streets and Utilities Committee meeting June 14, 2008 Streets and Utilities Committee holds Neighborhood Meeting on various project design issues. July – Nov, 2008 Review various design issues, Streets and Utilities Committee makes recommendations, Council adopt resolutions. July 15, 2008 Streets and Utilities Committee holds Neighborhood Meeting on the Raingarden Program (later renamed the Stormwater Infiltration Program). August 11, 2008 City Council approves the components of the Stormwater Infiltration Program. Sept 26, 2008 Notices on Infiltration Features mailed to affected properties October 2008 On-site meetings held with property owners to review infiltration features November 10, 2008 City Council considers appeals to the Stormwater Infiltration Program December 10, 2008 RCWD Permit obtained for project (CAPROC) COMPLETED ====================================================================== PLANNED November 24, 2008 City Council Approves Plans and Specifications, sets a bid date, and December 22, 2008 authorizes the advertisement for bids January 12, 2009 City Council adopts Parking resolutions for Hillview Road and Red Oak Drive (necessary for State Aid approval) January 16, 2009 State Aid Approval of Plans January 22, 2009 Bids Received (Thursday 2:00 PM, Mounds View City Hall) January 29, 2009 February 9, 2009 Award Construction Contract March 26, 2009 Neighborhood Preconstruction Meeting held May 4, 2009 Construction Begins (Phase 1) November, 2009 Construction Completed (Phase 1) May 3, 2010 Construction Begins (Phase 2) July / August, 2010 Placement of Bituminous Wear Surface (Phase 1) – Optional* October, 2010 Construction Completed (Phase 2) July / August, 2011 Placement of Bituminous Wear Surface (Phase 2) – Optional* Previous Estimated Construction Costs Current Estimated Construction Costs City Streets 1. Street Improvements: 2007-2008 SUIP Report (1)2,444,100$ Additional Items (Reviewed with Streets and Utilities Committee) Elimination of Fairchild / County Hwy 10 intersection (3,200)$ Street Improvements Total 2,440,900$2,539,900$ 2. Utility Improvements: 2007-2008 SUIP Report (1)345,100$ Utility Improvements Total 345,100$468,100$ 3. Storm Water Improvements: 2007-2008 SUIP Report (1)360,800$ Storm Water Improvements Total 360,800$77,300$ City Streets Total 3,146,800$3,085,300$ State Aid Streets 1. Street Improvements: 2007-2008 SUIP Report (1)608,000$ Additional Items (Reviewed with Streets and Utilities Committee) Hillview Park Parking (11,800)$ Hillview Road Width (East of Red Oak Drive)(8,700)$ Elimination of Sidewalk Option Along Hillview Road (6,300)$ Red Oak Drive width 36,100$ Red Oak Drive chokers / Additional Striping 25,200$ Red Oak Drive / County Hwy 10 Intersection 10,600$ Red Oak Drive sidewalk south of Hillview Road 10,200$ Street Improvements Total 663,300$1,162,400$ 2. Utility Improvements: 2007-2008 SUIP Report (1)57,100$ Utility Improvements Total 57,100$153,100$ 3. Storm Water Improvements: 2007-2008 SUIP Report (1)65,400$ Storm Water Improvements Total 65,400$16,000$ 4. Red Oak Drive North of Sherwood Road (2,3)528,300$ State Aid Streets Total 1,314,100$1,331,500$ Silver Lake Woods Condominiums 1. Street Improvements 215,500$229,800$ 2. Utility Improvements 21,500$8,400$ Silver Lake Woods Condominiums Total 237,000$238,200$ Total Estimated Construction Cost 4,697,900$4,655,000$ 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project (1) Adjusted for inflation (2) Cost determined by lineal foot cost used by City Finance Director in Program Financial Analysis (3) Includes Street Improvements and Utility Improvements 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project Estimated Construction Costs U No.Item Units Qty EE Unit Price EE Total Price PART 1 - STREET IMPROVEMENTS (TYPE A CONSTRUCTION): 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 3 CLEARING TREE4 $250.00 $1,000.00 4 GRUBBING TREE4 $250.00 $1,000.00 5 REMOVE OR SALVAGE SIGN EA 21 $125.00 $2,625.00 6 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN EA 42 $175.00 $7,350.00 7 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SY 4000 $2.50 $10,000.00 8 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SY 2300 $3.00 $6,900.00 9 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SY 54 $3.00 $162.00 10 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 20 $4.50 $90.00 11 REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKINGS LF 425 $1.00 $425.00 12 REMOVE PAVEMENT MESSAGE EA 1 $60.00 $60.00 13 SALVAGE MAILBOX AND POST AND DELIVER TO HOMEOWNER EA 215 $50.00 $10,750.00 14 INSTALL MAILBOX CLUSTER EA 103 $250.00 $25,750.00 15 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LF 390 $3.00 $1,170.00 16 RECLAIM BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 59700 $1.50 $89,550.00 17 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)CY 23830 $9.00 $214,470.00 18 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV)CY 1100 $11.00 $12,100.00 19 FOUNDATION PREPARATION, TYPE A CONSTRUCTION SY 66700 $1.00 $66,700.00 20 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 12500 $13.00 $162,500.00 21 B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 37000 $10.00 $370,000.00 22 CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER SY 48 $60.00 $2,880.00 PROJECT NO. 000435-07129-0 MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2008 $4,655,000 Dec. 18, 2008 CITY PROJECT NO. 2008-003 000435-07129-0 © 2008 Bonestroo 1 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE No.Item Units Qty EE Unit Price EE Total Price 23 7" COMMERCIAL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON SY 150 $50.00 $7,500.00 24 6" RESIDENTIAL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON SY 5490 $46.00 $252,540.00 25 PATCH BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SY 2360 $40.00 $94,400.00 26 PATCH GRAVEL DRIVEWAY SY 300 $15.00 $4,500.00 27 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 7100 $58.00 $411,800.00 28 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 2700 $3.00 $8,100.00 29 TYPE LV 3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 5300 $60.00 $318,000.00 30 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING, INCLUDING NEW CASTING AND ADJUSTING RINGS EA 63 $400.00 $25,200.00 31 ADJUST VALVE BOX EA 8 $200.00 $1,600.00 32 ADJUST CATCH BASIN CASTING EA 2 $400.00 $800.00 33 6" THICK CONC WALK FOR PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP SF 90 $5.00 $450.00 34 TRUNCATED DOME PANEL SF 18 $40.00 $720.00 35 4" PERFORATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE LF 400 $5.00 $2,000.00 36 CONNECT DRAIN TILE TO STRUCTURE - MACHINE CORE EA 8 $200.00 $1,600.00 37 SAW AND SEAL LF 10000 $2.00 $20,000.00 38 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE, YELLOW PAINT LF 440 $0.75 $330.00 39 4" SOLID LINE, WHITE PAINT LF 700 $0.50 $350.00 40 SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF 111 $25.00 $2,775.00 41 STREET NAME SIGN (1 BLADE)EA 3 $50.00 $150.00 42 STREET NAME SIGN (2 BLADES)EA 4 $100.00 $400.00 43 FURNISH AND INSTALL STREET NAME SIGN POST EA 10 $100.00 $1,000.00 44 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)CY 6900 $16.00 $110,400.00 45 SODDING, MINERAL TYPE SY 61600 $3.00 $184,800.00 46 APPLICATION OF WATER FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT MG 100 $50.00 $5,000.00 47 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL 1000 GAL 100 $60.00 $6,000.00 48 PROTECTION OF CATCH BASIN, NON-PAVED STREET EA 40 $150.00 $6,000.00 49 PROTECTION OF CATCH BASIN, PAVED STREET EA 40 $200.00 $8,000.00 50 STREET SWEEPER WITH OPERATOR HR 100 $125.00 $12,500.00 000435-07129-0 © 2008 Bonestroo 2 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE No.Item Units Qty EE Unit Price EE Total Price 51 SKIDSTEER (BOBCAT) WITH OPERATOR HR 100 $125.00 $12,500.00 $2,539,897.00 PART 2 - UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS (TYPE A CONSTRUCTION): 52 RECONSTRUCT INVERT AND DOGHOUSES EA 1 $250.00 $250.00 53 POTHOLE EXISTING UTILITY EA 5 $150.00 $750.00 54 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER PIPE LF 30 $15.00 $450.00 55 CORE DRILL CONNECTION TO EXISTING MANHOLE EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 56 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE EA 4 $500.00 $2,000.00 57 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER, SDR 35 LF 55 $50.00 $2,750.00 58 5' CIPP, 8" VCP EA 15 $1,700.00 $25,500.00 59 10' CIPP, 8" VCP EA 2 $2,200.00 $4,400.00 60 16' CIPP, 8" VCP EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 61 INLINE CIPP, 8" VCP LF 377 $35.00 $13,195.00 62 5' CIPP, 15" RCP EA 3 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 63 16' CIPP, 15" RCP EA 1 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 64 5' CIPP, 18" RCP EA 5 $2,300.00 $11,500.00 65 REPAIR PROTRUDING TAP EA 2 $600.00 $1,200.00 66 SEAL 4' DIA MH JOINT EA 1 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 67 TEST 8" SEWER JOINT EA 36 $70.00 $2,520.00 68 SEAL 8" SEWER JOINT EA 36 $15.00 $540.00 69 CHEMICAL GROUT GL 130 $8.00 $1,040.00 70 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER WYE EA 2 $750.00 $1,500.00 71 4" PVC, SCH. 40 SERVICE PIPE LF 70 $30.00 $2,100.00 72 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING WYE WITH 8" X 4" PVC WYE EA 25 $100.00 $2,500.00 73 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WITH 4" PVC SERVICE PIPE LF 750 $35.00 $26,250.00 74 RECONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EA 25 $200.00 $5,000.00 75 REMOVE 6" CIP WATER MAIN LF 85 $17.00 $1,445.00 TOTAL PART 1 - STREET IMPROVEMENTS (TYPE A CONSTRUCTION) 000435-07129-0 © 2008 Bonestroo 3 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE No.Item Units Qty EE Unit Price EE Total Price 76 REMOVE EXISTING CIP TEE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 77 SALVAGE HYDRANT AND DELIVER TO CITY EA 8 $1,000.00 $8,000.00 78 CUT IN 6" GV AND BOX EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 79 CUT IN 12" BV AND BOX EA 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 80 CUT 6"X6" TEE INTO EXISTING WATER MAIN EA 17 $2,000.00 $34,000.00 81 CUT 12"X6" TEE INTO EXISTING WATER MAIN EA 4 $2,500.00 $10,000.00 82 EXTEND HYDRANT BARREL LF 1.5 $500.00 $750.00 83 RECONSTRUCT VALVE BOX EA 3 $200.00 $600.00 84 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 21 $1,000.00 $21,000.00 85 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE AND BOX EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 86 5" VALVE HYDRANT EA 20 $2,500.00 $50,000.00 87 1" CURB STOP AND BOX EA 3 $250.00 $750.00 88 1" CORPORATION STOP EA 2 $250.00 $500.00 89 1" TYPE "K" COPPER WATER SERVICE LF 30 $25.00 $750.00 90 6" DIP WATER MAIN, CLASS 52 LF 165 $30.00 $4,950.00 91 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB 1410 $5.00 $7,050.00 92 REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN EA 36 $400.00 $14,400.00 93 REMOVE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP) LF 1050 $8.00 $8,400.00 94 REMOVE CMP STORM SEWER PIPE LF 150 $12.00 $1,800.00 95 SALVAGE CMP LF 60 $10.00 $600.00 96 REMOVE 12" FLARED END SECTION EA 1 $300.00 $300.00 97 RECONSTRUCT STORM MANHOLE EA 3 $500.00 $1,500.00 98 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EA 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 99 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EA 6 $500.00 $3,000.00 100 CUT INTO EXISTING STRUCTURE EA 3 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 101 2' X 3' STORM SEWER CB, INCL. R-3290-VB CSTG AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 29 $1,400.00 $40,600.00 102 2' X 3' STORM SEWER CB WITH 4' SUMP, INCL. R-3290-VB CSTG AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 2 $1,600.00 $3,200.00 000435-07129-0 © 2008 Bonestroo 4 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE No.Item Units Qty EE Unit Price EE Total Price 103 4' DIA STORM SEWER CBMH WITH 4' SUMP, INCL. R-3290-VB CSTG AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 2 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 104 4' DIA STORM SEWER CBMH, INCL. R-3290-VB CSTG AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 6 $1,800.00 $10,800.00 105 4' DIA STORM SEWER MH, INCL. R-1642-B CSTG AND HDPE ADJ RINGS EA 2 $1,800.00 $3,600.00 106 4' DIA STORM SEWER MH WITH 4' SUMP, INCL. R-1642-B CSTG AND HDPE ADJ RINGS EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 107 CONSTRUCT 2' X 3' STORM SEWER CB OVER EXISTING PIPE, INCL. R-3290-VB CSTG AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 2 $1,800.00 $3,600.00 108 CONSTRUCT 4' DIA STORM SEWER CBMH OVER EXISTING PIPE, INCL. R-3290-VB CSTG AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 7 $2,200.00 $15,400.00 109 CONSTRUCT 4' DIA STORM SEWER MH OVER EXISTING PIPE, INCL. R-1642-B CSTG AND HDPE ADJ RINGS EA 5 $2,200.00 $11,000.00 110 12" RCP STORM SEWER, CLASS 5 LF 950 $25.00 $23,750.00 111 12" DIP STORM SEWER LF 270 $35.00 $9,450.00 112 15" RCP STORM SEWER, CLASS 5 LF 690 $30.00 $20,700.00 113 21" RCP STORM SEWER, CLASS 4 LF 190 $40.00 $7,600.00 114 12" RCP FLARED END SECTION EA 3 $800.00 $2,400.00 115 15" RCP FLARED END SECTION EA 1 $900.00 $900.00 116 21" RCP FLARED END SECTION EA 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 117 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL ROCK RIP RAP LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 118 CLASS III RANDOM RIPRAP CY 38 $100.00 $3,800.00 119 COMMON EXCAVATION - INFILTRATION FEATURE CY 1720 $25.00 $43,000.00 120 4" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MODIFIED CY 490 $22.00 $10,780.00 121 SEED AND HYDROMULCH SY 3560 $5.00 $17,800.00 122 SEEDING, INCL SEED, FERTILIZER, AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 850 $5.00 $4,250.00 123 EROSION STABILIZATION MAT SY 60 $25.00 $1,500.00 124 SILT FENCE, MACHINE SLICED LF 520 $2.25 $1,170.00 $545,440.00 125 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 TOTAL PART 2 - UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS (TYPE A CONSTRUCTION) PART 3 - STREET IMPROVEMENTS (TYPE B CONSTRUCTION) - SILVER LAKE WOODS: 000435-07129-0 © 2008 Bonestroo 5 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE No.Item Units Qty EE Unit Price EE Total Price 126 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 127 REMOVE OR SALVAGE SIGN EA 1 $125.00 $125.00 128 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN EA 7 $175.00 $1,225.00 129 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SY 110 $4.00 $440.00 130 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 610 $25.00 $15,250.00 131 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LF 140 $3.00 $420.00 132 RECLAIM BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 8500 $2.00 $17,000.00 133 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)CY 1300 $9.00 $11,700.00 134 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV)CY 100 $11.00 $1,100.00 135 FOUNDATION PREPARATION, TYPE B CONSTRUCTION SY 8300 $1.00 $8,300.00 136 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 1400 $13.00 $18,200.00 137 PATCH BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SY 110 $40.00 $4,400.00 138 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 1100 $58.00 $63,800.00 139 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 415 $3.00 $1,245.00 140 TYPE LV 3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 900 $60.00 $54,000.00 141 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING, INCLUDING NEW CASTING AND ADJUSTING RINGS EA 9 $400.00 $3,600.00 142 4" PERFORATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE LF 200 $5.00 $1,000.00 143 CONNECT DRAIN TILE TO STRUCTURE - MACHINE CORE EA 4 $200.00 $800.00 144 ADJUST VALVE BOX EA 4 $200.00 $800.00 145 SAW AND SEAL LF 1600 $2.00 $3,200.00 146 SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF 6 $25.00 $150.00 147 STREET NAME SIGN (1 BLADE)EA 3 $50.00 $150.00 148 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)CY 28 $16.00 $448.00 149 SODDING, MINERAL TYPE SY 250 $3.00 $750.00 150 APPLICATION OF WATER FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT MG 15 $50.00 $750.00 151 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL 1000 GAL 15 $60.00 $900.00 152 PROTECTION OF CATCH BASIN, PAVED STREET EA 11 $250.00 $2,750.00 153 STREET SWEEPER WITH OPERATOR HR 17 $125.00 $2,125.00 000435-07129-0 © 2008 Bonestroo 6 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE No.Item Units Qty EE Unit Price EE Total Price 154 SKIDSTEER (BOBCAT) WITH OPERATOR HR 17 $125.00 $2,125.00 $229,753.00 155 REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN EA 3 $400.00 $1,200.00 156 REMOVE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP) LF 52 $8.00 $416.00 157 REMOVE EXISTING PVC PIPE FT 29 $12.00 $348.00 158 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 159 2' X 3' STORM SEWER CB, INCL. R-3290-VB CSTG AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 1 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 160 15" RCP STORM SEWER, CLASS 5 LF 36 $30.00 $1,080.00 161 COMMON EXCAVATION - INFILTRATION FEATURE CY 70 $25.00 $1,750.00 162 4" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MODIFIED CY 20 $22.00 $440.00 163 SEED AND HYDROMULCH SY 150 $5.00 $750.00 $8,384.00 164 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 165 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 30 $4.50 $135.00 166 REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKINGS LF 90 $1.00 $90.00 167 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SY 1400 $2.50 $3,500.00 168 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SY 500 $3.00 $1,500.00 169 REMOVE LOOP DETECTOR EA 7 $100.00 $700.00 170 SALVAGE MAILBOX AND POST AND DELIVER TO HOMEOWNER EA 65 $50.00 $3,250.00 171 REMOVE OR SALVAGE SIGN EA 6 $125.00 $750.00 172 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN EA 22 $175.00 $3,850.00 173 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LF 370 $3.00 $1,110.00 174 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)CY 8220 $9.00 $73,980.00 175 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV)CY 500 $11.00 $5,500.00 TOTAL PART 3 - STREET IMPROVEMENTS (TYPE B CONSTRUCTION) - SILVER LAKE WOODS TOTAL PART 4 - UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS (TYPE B CONSTRUCTION) - SILVER LAKE WOODS (TYPE B CONSTRUCTION) PART 4 - UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS (TYPE B CONSTRUCTION) - SILVER LAKE WOODS: PART 5 - STREET IMPROVEMENTS (TYPE A CONSTRUCTION) - STATE AID: 000435-07129-0 © 2008 Bonestroo 7 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE No.Item Units Qty EE Unit Price EE Total Price 176 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)CY 2600 $16.00 $41,600.00 177 FOUNDATION PREPARATION, TYPE A CONSTRUCTION SY 30600 $1.00 $30,600.00 178 STREET SWEEPER WITH OPERATOR HR 51 $125.00 $6,375.00 179 SKIDSTEER (BOBCAT) WITH OPERATOR HR 51 $125.00 $6,375.00 180 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL 1000 GAL 30 $60.00 $1,800.00 181 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 5800 $13.00 $75,400.00 182 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 - SIDEWALK TN 120 $20.00 $2,400.00 183 SAW AND SEAL LF 4700 $2.00 $9,400.00 184 RECLAIM BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 28100 $1.50 $42,150.00 185 MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (1 1/2" DEEP) SY 160 $17.00 $2,720.00 186 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 3400 $58.00 $197,200.00 187 TYPE LV 3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 2600 $60.00 $156,000.00 188 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 1300 $3.00 $3,900.00 189 PATCH BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SY 870 $40.00 $34,800.00 190 4" PERFORATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE LF 200 $5.00 $1,000.00 191 CONNECT DRAIN TILE TO STRUCTURE - MACHINE CORE EA 4 $200.00 $800.00 192 ADJUST VALVE BOX EA 1 $200.00 $200.00 193 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING, INCLUDING NEW CASTING AND ADJUSTING RINGS EA 25 $400.00 $10,000.00 194 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF 3700 $3.50 $12,950.00 195 B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 13800 $10.00 $138,000.00 196 7" COMMERCIAL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON SY 340 $50.00 $17,000.00 197 6" RESIDENTIAL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON SY 1830 $46.00 $84,180.00 198 6" THICK CONC WALK FOR PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP SF 1570 $5.00 $7,850.00 199 TRUNCATED DOME PANEL SF 250 $40.00 $10,000.00 200 APPLICATION OF WATER FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT MG 30 $50.00 $1,500.00 201 INSTALL MAILBOX CLUSTER EA 31 $250.00 $7,750.00 202 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 203 SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF 113 $25.00 $2,825.00 000435-07129-0 © 2008 Bonestroo 8 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE No.Item Units Qty EE Unit Price EE Total Price 204 FURNISH AND INSTALL STREET NAME SIGN POST EA 10 $100.00 $1,000.00 205 REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 206 NMC LOOP DETECTOR, 6' X 6'EA 6 $1,200.00 $7,200.00 207 PROTECTION OF CATCH BASIN, NON-PAVED STREET EA 38 $200.00 $7,600.00 208 PROTECTION OF CATCH BASIN, PAVED STREET EA 38 $250.00 $9,500.00 209 SODDING, MINERAL TYPE SY 23000 $3.00 $69,000.00 210 PAVEMENT MESSAGE, RIGHT - THRU ARROW - PAINT EA 2 $100.00 $200.00 211 PAVEMENT MESSAGE, LEFT TURN ARROW - PAINT EA 2 $100.00 $200.00 212 PAVEMENT MESSAGE, HANDICAPPED SYMBOL - PAINT EA 2 $100.00 $200.00 213 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE, YELLOW PAINT LF 6310 $0.75 $4,732.50 214 4" SOLID LINE, WHITE PAINT LF 8770 $0.50 $4,385.00 215 8" DOTTED LINE, WHITE PAINT LF 75 $1.00 $75.00 216 36" ZEBRA CROSSWALK, WHITE PAINT SF 810 $2.75 $2,227.50 $1,162,360.00 217 REMOVE EXISTING HDPE PIPE LF 20 $12.00 $240.00 218 REMOVE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP) LF 930 $8.00 $7,440.00 219 REMOVE CMP STORM SEWER PIPE LF 10 $12.00 $120.00 220 REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN EA 24 $400.00 $9,600.00 221 POTHOLE EXISTING UTILITY EA 5 $150.00 $750.00 222 COMMON EXCAVATION - INFILTRATION FEATURE CY 370 $25.00 $9,250.00 223 4" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MODIFIED CY 100 $22.00 $2,200.00 224 12" DIP STORM SEWER, CLASS 52 LF 180 $35.00 $6,300.00 225 12" RCP FLARED END SECTION EA 1 $800.00 $800.00 226 12" RCP STORM SEWER, CLASS 5 LF 1010 $25.00 $25,250.00 227 15" RCP STORM SEWER, CLASS 5 LF 140 $30.00 $4,200.00 228 18" RCP STORM SEWER, CLASS 5 LF 55 $35.00 $1,925.00 TOTAL PART 5 - STREET IMPROVEMENTS (TYPE A CONSTRUCTION) - STATE AID: PART 6 - UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS (TYPE A CONSTRUCTION) - STATE AID: 000435-07129-0 © 2008 Bonestroo 9 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE No.Item Units Qty EE Unit Price EE Total Price 229 21" RCP STORM SEWER, CLASS 4 LF 280 $40.00 $11,200.00 230 24" RCP STORM SEWER, CLASS 4 LF 40 $50.00 $2,000.00 231 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EA 5 $500.00 $2,500.00 232 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EA 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 233 CUT INTO EXISTING STRUCTURE EA 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 234 2' X 3' STORM SEWER CB, INCL. R-3290-VB CSTG AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 21 $1,400.00 $29,400.00 235 4' DIA STORM SEWER CBMH, INCL. R-3290-VB CSTG AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 7 $1,800.00 $12,600.00 236 4' DIA STORM SEWER MH, INCL. R-1642-B CSTG AND HDPE ADJ RINGS EA 2 $1,800.00 $3,600.00 237 CONSTRUCT 2' X 3' STORM SEWER CB OVER EXISTING PIPE, INCL. R-3290-VB CSTG AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 3 $1,800.00 $5,400.00 238 CONSTRUCT 4' DIA STORM SEWER CBMH OVER EXISTING PIPE, INCL. R-3290-VB CSTG AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 6 $2,400.00 $14,400.00 239 CONSTRUCT 4' DIA STORM SEWER MH OVER EXISTING PIPE, INCL. R-1642-B CSTG AND HDPE ADJ RINGS EA 5 $2,400.00 $12,000.00 240 RECONSTRUCT INVERT EA 1 $400.00 $400.00 241 SEED AND HYDROMULCH SY 900 $5.00 $4,500.00 $169,075.00 $2,539,897.00 $545,440.00 $229,753.00 $8,384.00 $1,162,360.00 $169,075.00 TOTAL $4,654,909.00 USE $4,655,000.00 PART 6 - UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS (TYPE A CONSTRUCTION) - STATE AID: TOTAL PART 6 - UTILITY IMPROVMENTS (TYPE A CONSTRUCTION) - STATE AID TOTAL PART 1 - STREET IMPROVMENTS (TYPE A CONSTRUCTION) TOTAL PART 2 - UTILITY IMPROVMENTS (TYPE A CONSTRUCTION) TOTAL PART 3 - STREET IMPROVMENTS (TYPE B CONSTRUCTION) - SILVER LAKE WOODS TOTAL PART 4 - UTILITY IMPROVMENTS (TYPE B CONSTRUCTION) - SILVER LAKE WOODS TOTAL PART 5 - STREET IMPROVMENTS (TYPE A CONSTRUCTION) - STATE AID 000435-07129-0 © 2008 Bonestroo 10 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ROB MARTY SCOTT RIGGS CITY ATTORNEY 2008 CITY PROJECT NO. 2008-003 JOE FLAHERTY JAMES ERICSON ROGER STIGNEY AL HULL CITY ADMINISTRATOR COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER MAYOR CAROL MUELLER COUNCILMEMBER 2009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT AREAS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129G101A.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:51:18 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129G101AMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/0843507129G101ATITLE SHEETG1.01 PROJECT AREA SEE STATE AID PLAN SHEETS FOR HILLVIEW ROAD AND RED OAK DRIVE WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129C101A.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:48:47 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129C101AMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/0843507129C101ALOCATION PLANC1.01 Edgewood DriveGreenfield AvenueSherwood Road Laport Drive Greenfield PlaceJackson DriveTH 10 2442 2434 2443 8088 8070 8044 8016 8012 7988 7968 7948 7930 8095 8075 7945 7941 7937 7933 7929 7925 7921 7917 7913 7905 7901 7909 7944 7940 7936 7932 7928 7924 7920 7914 7910 7906 7900 7947 7943 7939 7935 7931 7927 7923 7919 7913 7909 7905 2408 2402 2401 2411 2407 2406 2400 2364 2356 2348 2340 2336 2332 2320 2310 2300 8101 8121 8134 8120 2409 2403 2373 2367 2357 2349 2341 2333 2325 2317 2309 2305 2408 2400 2372 2364 2356 2342 2332 2322 2312 2308 2300 2411 2385 2373 8237 2349 2341 2325 8140 8130 8120 81102443 2431 2416 8141 2401 2361 2432Hillview Road C4.05SEE SHEETC6.16SEE SHEET C5.05SEE SHEETC6.13SEE SHEETC6.15SEE SHEETC5.06SEE SHEET C4.04SEE SHEET C4.06SEE SHEET C4.05SEE SHEET C6.12SEE SHEET C6.17SEE SHEETC4.05SEE SHEETC6.14SEE SHEETC4.06SEE SHEETC5.07SEE SHEETC6.16SEE SHEETC1.01SEE SHEETC1.01SEE SHEETEdgewood DriveEastwood RoadGreenwood DriveCo u n t y H i g h w a y 1 0 2625 2665 2657 7801 7767 7761 7755 7745 7715 7760 7750 7730 7710 2609 2583 2581 2565 7741 7731 7721 7711 7700 7720 7730 7740 2567 2617 2677 7764 2631-2651 Lake Court CircleLake Court DriveM o u n d s V i e w D r i v eC6.25SEE SHEETC6.25SEE SHEETC6.24SEE SHEETC5.08 SEE SHE E T C1.01SEE SHEET 2712 TO 2722 2696 TO 2706 2680 TO 2690 2664 TO 2674 2648 TO 2662 2745 TO 2759 2735 TO 2743 2719 TO 2727 2703 TO 2711 2683 TO 2691 2699 TO 2707 2617 TO 2621 2639 TO 2647 2655 TO 2663 2632 TO 2646 2616 TO 2630 2600 TO 2614 2601 TO 2611 2582 TO 2596 2566 TO 2580 2576 2540 2640 2760 County Road I Long Lake RoadLong Lake RoadWAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129C102A.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:49:29 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129C102AMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/0843507129C102ALOCATION PLANC1.02 2.0% VAR (17'-40') 12" 6" SALVAGED RECLAIMED MATERIAL (SUPPLEMENT WITH NEW CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE AS NEEDED) PREPARED SUBGRADE VAR (17'-40') DESIGN C GRADE 1.5"-TYPE LV3 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (LVWE35030B) 2"-TYPE LV3 BITUMINOUS NON-WEARING COURSE (LVNW35030B) L VAR (5'-25')VAR (5'-25')14'14' TYPICAL SECTION 1 SUNNYSIDE RD EASTWOOD RD GREENWOOD DR SHERWOOD RD TYPICAL SECTION 2 FAIRCHILD AVE JACKSON DR ALL RADII ARE 15' TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES (TYPICAL SECTIONS 1, 2, AND 3): 1. RECLAIM EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACING AND AGGREGATE BASE. 2. SALVAGE AND STOCKPILE EXISTING MATERIAL. 3. EXCAVATE AND PREPARE SUBGRADE TO ACCOMMODATE NEW DESIGN SECTION. 4. REPLACE SALVAGED RECLAIM MATERIAL FOR USE AS RECYCLED CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE. 5. IF SHORT, SUPPLEMENT WITH NEW CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE MATERIAL AS NECESSARY. 6. IF LONG, REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXCESS RECLAIMED MATERIAL. SUBGRADE PREPARATION CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE 3.0" - TYPE LV4 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (LVWE45030B) (MATCH EXISTING THICKNESS, 4" MIN.) BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY REPAIR TYPICAL SECTION SUBGRADE PREPARATION CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (MATCH EXISTING THICKNESS, 4" MIN.) CONCRETE DRIVEWAY REPAIR TYPICAL SECTION 2.0% VAR (17'-40') 12" 6" SALVAGED RECLAIMED MATERIAL (SUPPLEMENT WITH NEW CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE AS NEEDED) PREPARED SUBGRADE VAR (17'-40') DESIGN C GRADE 2.4% 1.5"-TYPE LV3 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (LVWE35030B) 2"-TYPE LV3 BITUMINOUS NON-WEARING COURSE (LVNW35030B) L VAR (5'-25')VAR (5'-25')12'12' VAR (17'-40')VAR (17'-40') 2.5" AVERAGE EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACING EXISTING BASE MATERIAL VAR (5'-25')VAR (5'-25')13.5'13.5' EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION 10.5'*10.5'* 10'**10'** * FAIRCHILD AVENUE ONLY ** JACKSON DRIVE ONLY EXISTING BITUMINOUS INTEGRANT CURB MnDOT B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER MnDOT B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER VARIES (WIDTH "B") 2' 5' 2' 0.75" PER FOOT MNDOT B618 C O N C R E T E CURB AND GU T T E R SOD BEHIND CURB 2.4% 4:1 4:1 1.0' FROM T/C TO BOTTOM OF FEATURE (TOP OF SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MODIFIED) 0.5' FROM GUTTER TO BOTTOM OF FEATURE (TOP OF SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MODIFIED) (DEPTH "C") 5:1 SLOPE AT CURB CUT 4" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MODIFIED (SAND/COMPOST/TOPSOIL MIXTURE - SEE SPECIFICATIONS) MnDOT B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CURB CUT FOR INFILTRATION FEATURE TYPICAL SECTION A-A GRADING LIMITS (TOP OF SLOPE) B618 CURB AND GUTTERA A INFILTRATION FEATURE PLAN VIEW CURB CUT TYPICAL SECTION 3 LAKE COURT DRIVE LAKE COURT CIRCLE 2.0% 20' 12" 6" SALVAGED RECLAIMED MATERIAL (SUPPLEMENT WITH NEW CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE AS NEEDED) PREPARED SUBGRADE 20' DESIGN C GRADE 2.4% 1.5"-TYPE LV3 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (LVWE35030B) 2"-TYPE LV3 BITUMINOUS NON-WEARING COURSE (LVNW35030B) L 1'1'19'19' EXISTING SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER EDGEWOOD DR GREENFIELD AVE GREENFIELD PL LAPORT DRIVE CONSTRUCTION NOTES (TYPICAL SECTION 3): 1. REMOVE AND REPLACE DAMAGED CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER TOP OF TOPSOIL TO BE 4" BELOW CURB CUT ELEVATION 4" SALVAGED TOPSOIL AND SOD 4" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MODIFIED (SAND/COMPOST/TOPSOIL MIXTURE - SEE SPECIFICATIONS). RESTORE WITH SEED/HYDROMULCH OR SEED/EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AS SPECIFIED. 4" SALVAGED TOPSOIL AND SOD ELEVATION OF CURB CUT BOTTOM OF FEATURE EXTEND SOD TO BOTTOM OF FEATURE AT CURB CUT EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY (R/W) LENGTH "A"WIDTH "B"WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129C103A.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:49:43 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129C103AMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/0843507129C103ATYPICAL SECTIONSC1.03 2791 7934 7932 2757 2749 2741 7900 79507933 Red Oak DriveFairchild AvenueRed Oak DriveHillview Road ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>||||||||>>>>>>BIT.BIT.BIT.BIT.CONC.CONC.GRAV.BIT.CONC.CONC.CONC.BIT.CONC.CONC.CONC.BIT.BIT.BIT.BIT.BIT.>>>>>>>>G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DCUT INTO SS-57 SS-56 SS-55 EXMH-1 SS-59SS-58 SS-55 0+001+002+003+004+005+00 913.6913.3913.3913.4913.4913.8913.3913.6912.8912.5912.0912.4SS-57STA 5+47RIM 911.40INV 909.19 12"SS-56STA 4+91RIM 912.23INV 909.05 12"INV 909.05 12"SS-55STA 1+26RIM 913.41INV 908.57 12"INV 908.14 12"INV 908.14 12"EXMH-1STA 0+00RIM 913.57INV 908.22 12"INV 907.82 12"56' 0.25% 12" DIP 365'0.25%12" RCP 126'0.25%12" RCP INV 907.82 EX. 15"WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129C509A.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:39:27 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129C509AMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/0843507129C509ASTORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTSHILLVIEW ROADC5.09 HILLVIEW ROAD G-A G-A G-B G-B G-C G-C G-D G-D THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION ON THIS PLAN IS SHOWN TO UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LEGEND PROVIDED BELOW. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDLINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDLINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA. UTILITY DESIGNATIONS TO BE AS FOLLOWS: G=NATURAL GAS E-ELECTRIC T=TELEPHONE CTV=CABLE TV FO=FIBER OPTIC OHP=OVERHEAD POWER UTILITY QUALITY LEVELS: QUALITY LEVEL A QUALITY LEVEL B QUALITY LEVEL C QUALITY LEVEL D PRIVATE UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN THE LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY COMPANIES DURING THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAN. NOTE: ALL STORM SEWER IS RCP, CLASS 5, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. Red Oak DriveFairchild AvenueSunnyside RoadEastwood RoadGreenwood DriveLong Lake RoadHillview Road Sherwood Road Groveland RoadLaport Drive Co u n t y R o a d 1 0Red OakCourtEdgewood DriveGreenfield AvenueSherwood Road Laport Drive GreenfieldPlaceJackson DriveUS H i g h w a y 1 0 NOTES: 1. SALVAGE EXISTING MAIL BOXES AND POSTS AND RETURN TO EACH HOMEOWNER. 2. INSTALL MAIL BOX CLUSTERS AND POSTS PER STANDARD DETAIL. LEGEND: MAIL BOX POST INDICATES THE LOTS WHICH WILL HAVE A MAIL BOX ON EACH POST WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129C621A.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:51:05 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129C621AMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/0843507129C621AMAILBOX GROUPING PLANC6.21 2009 RED OAK DRIVE - HILLVIEW ROAD TO LONG LAKE ROAD WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129G101A-S.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:51:30 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129G101A-SMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/0843507129G101A-STITLE SHEETG1.01-S S.A.P. 146-241-001 RED OAK DRIVE - CO HWY 10 TO HILLVIEW ROAD HILLVIEW ROAD - RED OAK DRIVE TO LONG LAKE ROAD S.A.P. 146-228-005 & 7930 7945 7935 7946 7940Red Oak DriveFairchild AvenueSunnyside RoadEastwood RoadGreenwood DriveLong Lake RoadEdgewood DriveHillview Road Sherwood RoadRed Oak DriveGroveland RoadArdan Avenue Laport Drive Long Lake Road TH 1 0 Co u n t y H i g h w a y 1 0Red OakCourtEND S.A.P. 146-241-001 STA. 47+11.56 END S.A.P. 146-228-005 STA. 25+37.12 BEGIN S.A.P. 146-228-005 STA. 0+92.65 Woodlawn DriveSilver Lake RoadBEGIN S.A.P. 146-241-001 STA. 0+35.43 2625 2665 2657 2701 2711 2791 8121 8101810025572573258125652601260926178111 8141 8145 8165 26412649 265726652673 812181202717 8125 8130 2735 274927572765 28012809281728252833 8127 2832 2824 2816 2812 2808 8064 8046 8036 8026 8016 8000 7990 7980 7960 7950 7934 7932 2756 2748 2740 8080 2757 2749 2741 7900 8070 8060 8040 8028 8016 8004 7960 7956 7950 8081 8071 8059 8039 8025 8009 7981 7979 7959 7949 7901 2716 2708 8088 8042 8066 8050 8032 8018 8006 7990 7980 7970 7954 7900 8075 8071 8055 8045 8033 8011 7981 7969 7965 7959 2665 2655 2649 7900 2648 2640 2625 2617 8068 8060 8052 8040 8000 7990 7980 7966 7930 8099 8071 8065 8051 8035 8021 7989 7979 7969 7927 7917 7901 2616 2600 8072 8050 8044 8032 8022 8000 7996 7980 7960 7950 7940 7900 8085 8071 8045 8031 8019 8001 7993 7985 7961 7951 2564 2556 8086 8072 8060 8046 8038 8030 8010 7990 7970 7964 7954 7901 8085 8071 8041 8035 8011 7977 7975 7955 7945 7901 2519 2515 2509 2518 2516 2508 8080 8070 8046 8024 8000 7984 7980 7944 7934 8085 8071 8051 8027 8005 7989 7971 7953 7931 2458 2450 2442 2434 2467 2459 2451 2443 8088 8070 8044 8016 8012 7988 7968 7948 7930 8130 8120 81102443245124592519 2521 2501 8126 8123 2716 2656 26487886 7876 7870 7891 7885 7877 7863 7851 7866 7854 7880 7842 7830 7820 7810 7800 7895 7867 7851 7841 7815 7809 7801 7767 7761 7755 7745 7715 7890 7870 7860 7850 7840 7790 7770 7760 7750 7730 7710 2609 2583 2581 2565 7885 7869 7865 7855 7835 7815 7805 7801 7751 7741 7731 7721 7711 7864 7858 7852 7846 7840 7800 7780 7700 7720 7730 7740 7750 7760 2566 2556 2567 7970 2725 8075 8085 8045 8025 8015 8005 7985 7975 7965 7955 7933 2431 2617 7900 7840 7828 7841 7831 2677 8081 8011 7764 2631-2651 8084 8230 8240 8494 8484 8474 8460 8456 8444 8434 8420 8406 8400 8380 8372 8368 8364 8340 8312 8300 8290 8280 8270 8260 8250 8495 8485 8475 8465 8455 8443 8435 8425 8415 8405 8379 8373 8345 8331 8315 8303 8295 8287 8281 8273 8267 8261 8255 8367 8359 8135 8145 8155 8165 8175 8211 8220 8210 8200 8148 8142 2740 2624 2616 2741 STRUCTURE TYPE STD. PLATE CASTING DIA.SPECIAL COMMENTS SS-100 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'--- SS-101 MH STO-3 R-1642 4'--- SS-102 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'--- SS-103 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-104 MH STO-3 R-1642 4'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 15" RCP SS-105 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 4'--- SS-106 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-107 MH STO-3 R-1642 4'--- SS-108 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'--- SS-109 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-110 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 18" RCP SS-111 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 6'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 18" RCP SS-112 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 18" RCP SS-113 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'--- SS-114 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'--- SS-115 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-116 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-117 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 12" RCP SS-118 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-119 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 24" RCP SS-120 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-121 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 24" RCP SS-122 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'--- SS-123 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-124 MH STO-3 R-1642 4'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 15" RCP SS-125 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-126 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-127 MH STO-3 R-1642 4'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 15" RCP SS-128 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-129 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-130 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'--- SS-131 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-132 MH STO-3 R-1642 4'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 15" RCP SS-133 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-134 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-135 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 15" RCP SS-136 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-137 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 18" RCP SS-138 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. PIPES SS-139 MH STO-3 R-1642 4'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 21" RCP SS-140 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 21" RCP SS-141 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-142 CBMH STO-4 R-3290-VB 4'--- SS-143 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-144 MH STO-3 R-1642 4'CONSTRUCT OVER EX. PIPES SS-145 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3'--- SS-146 CB STO-5 R-3290-VB 2' x 3' CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 12" HDPE STORM SEWER SCHEDULE - STATE AID HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT - RED OAK DRIVE (S.A.P. 146-241-001) POINT STATION RADIUS DELTA BEARING NORTHING EASTING PI 0+00.00 216872.815N 00-47-04 W PC 217001.333 542890.794 1+28.53 PI 02-36-14 PT 542888.7241000.00 217024.058 542889.445 1+94.56 217046.773 PI PC 217067.345 2+17.29 217090.0601000.00 2-36-14 N 00-47-04 W PT 2+40.00 542890.509217112.785 PI 13+22.25 218194.931 542875.693 1+51.26 1+73.98 N 01-49-10 E 542889.035 542890.099 542890.820 PI 23+32.67 542862.263219205.2570.00 0-00-45 N 00-44-57 W PI 47+22.11 542831.026221594.494 0.00 0-01-22 N 00-45-42 W HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT - RED OAK DRIVE/HILLVIEW ROAD (S.A.P. 146-228-005) POINT STATION RADIUS DELTA BEARING NORTHING EASTING PI 0+00.00 216531.655N 39-32-19 E PI 216872.776 542607.883 4+42.33 PI 545001.067216934.00925+54.81 542889.469N 88-20-20 E BASIS OF QUANTITIES MASS OF BITUMINOUS MATERIAL 115 LB/SY*IN MASS OF AGGREGATE BASE 110 LB/SY*IN BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 0.05 GAL/SY Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATES PLATE NO.DESCRIPTION 3000 L REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE THE FOLLOWING STANDARD PLATES, APPROVED BY THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, SHALL APPLY ON THIS PROJECT 3006 G GASKET JOINT FOR RC PIPE 3100 G CONCRETE APRON FOR RCP 3145 F CONCRETE PIPE TIES 4180 J MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN STEP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129C101A-S.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:49:07 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129C101A-SMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/0843507129C101A-SLOCATION PLAN, SCHEDULES, AND TABULATIONSC1.01-SS.A.P. 146-228-005S.A.P. 146-241-001 TYPICAL SECTION B TYPICAL SECTION D RED OAK DR - HILLVIEW RD TO LONG LAKE ROAD HILLVIEW RD - RED OAK DR TO LONG LAKE RD 2% (MIN.) VARIES (25'-38') 12"MnDOT B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER VARIES (25'-38') VARIES (6'-19')VARIES (6'-19')19'13' 2% (MIN.) 33'33' 2.4% 13'20' 11'2' CURB REACTION11'8' PARKING LANE 8' PARKING LANE 20' 12'8' PARKING LANE C EAST ROW 13' 2.4% TYPICAL SECTION C RED OAK DR CHOKERS - HILLVIEW RD TO LONG LAKE ROAD 2% (MIN.) VARIES (25'-38')VARIES (25'-38') VARIES (12'-25')13' DESIGN GRADE 11'2' CURB REACTION WEST ROW EAST ROW 2.4% 11'2' CURB REACTION 13'VARIES (12'-25') WEST ROW L CL MnDOT B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CL DESIGN GRADECL THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE 1.5' CLEAR ZONE 1.5' CLEAR ZONE 1.5' CLEAR ZONE 12" NORTH ROW SOUTH ROWCL DESIGN GRADECL THRU LANE THRU LANE MnDOT B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 12" TYPICAL SECTION A RED OAK DR - CO RD 10 TO HILLVIEW RD 2% (MIN.) VARIES 35'-36'VARIES 30'-31' 2.4% VARIES 10'-11'20'20' 12' VARIES 15'-16' WEST ROW EAST ROW CL DESIGN GRADECL THRU/RIGHT TURN LANE MnDOT B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 12" 12' 12' THRU LANE 12' LEFT TURN LANE 6' 2' CURB REACTION2' CURB REACTION 1.5' CLEAR ZONE 1.5' CLEAR ZONE 6.5' INSET A INSET B INSET A INSET A INSET A 6.5'6.5' INSET B 66' GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. RECLAIM EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACING AND AGGREGATE BASE. 2. SALVAGE AND STOCKPILE EXISTING MATERIAL. 3. EXCAVATE AND PREPARE SUBGRADE TO ACCOMMODATE NEW DESIGN SECTION. 4. REPLACE SALVAGED RECLAIM MATERIAL FOR USE AS RECYCLED CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE. 5. IF SHORT, SUPPLEMENT WITH NEW CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE MATERIAL AS NECESSARY. 6. IF LONG, REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXCESS RECLAIMED MATERIAL. 6" SALVAGED RECLAIMED MATERIAL (SUPPLEMENT WITH NEW PREPARED SUBGRADE 1.5" TYPE LV3 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (LVWE35030B) 2" TYPE LV3 BITUMINOUS NON-WEARING COURSE (LVNW35030B) CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE AS NEEDED) INSET A TYPICAL STREET SECTION 4" TYPE 3A32A CONCRETE WALK 4" CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE INSET B TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION (2" = HILLVIEW ROAD, FROM CO RD 10 TO HILLVIEW RD) SUBGRADE PREPARATION CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (MATCH EXISTING THICKNESS, 4" MIN.) CONCRETE DRIVEWAY REPAIR TYPICAL SECTION SUBGRADE PREPARATION CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE 3.0" - TYPE LV4 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (LVWE45030B) (MATCH EXISTING THICKNESS, 4" MIN.) BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY REPAIR TYPICAL SECTION TYPICAL SECTION E HILLVIEW RD - HILLVIEW PARK PARKING 2% (MIN.) 33'33' 2.4% 13'20' 8' PARKING LANE 12'20' ANGLED PARKING STALLS WEST ROW EAST ROWCL DESIGN GRADECL THRU LANE THRU LANE MnDOT B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 12" 12' INSET A 2'11'6.5' INSET B (45 DEGREES)WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129C103A-S.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:50:18 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129C103A-SMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/0843507129C103A-STYPICAL SECTIONSC1.03-SS.A.P. 146-228-005S.A.P. 146-241-001 GRAV.BIT.BIT.CONC.GRAV.BIT.CONC.BIT.BIT.BIT.BIT.BIT.CONC.BIT.BIT.BIT.BIT.BIT.BIT.CONC.BIT.BIT.CONC.BIT.CONC.CONC.GRAV.REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EX. CBMH & 32'-EX. 12" RCP. SALVAGE CASTING AND DELIVER TO CITY. REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EX. CBMH. SALVAGE CASTING AND DELIVER TO CITY. REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EX. CB & 32'-EX. 24" RCP. SALVAGE CASTING AND DELIVER TO CITY. CONSTRUCT CBMH OVER EXISTING 24" RCP. REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EX. CBMH. SALVAGE CASTING AND DELIVER TO CITY. Red Oak Drive Ardan AvenueLaport Drive8230 8240 8312 8300 8290 8280827082608250 831583038295 82878281 82738267 82618255 8145 8155 8165 8175 8211 82208210 820081488142 2740 CONSTRUCT CBMH OVER EXISTING 12" RCP CONSTRUCT CBMH OVER EXISTING 24" RCP SS-115 SS-114 SS-113 SS-112 SS-111 EXMH-3 SS-110 EXMH-2 SS-118 SS-114 SS-117 SS-112 SS-116 SS-111 SS-121 SS-119 EXMH-2 SS-120SS-119 CUT IN TO EX. MH CONNECT TO EX. MH 0+00908.1908.3SS-117STA 0+31RIM 908.09INV 904.29 12"SS-112STA 0+00RIM 908.23INV 903.90 12"INV 903.90 12"INV 903.90 EX. 18"31' 1.25% 12" RCP INV 904.29 EX. 12"0+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+00 908.6909.3910.3910.6909.6910.0909.6909.1908.7908.9909.4909.8910.4911.1911.6912.3912.8913.3EXISTING PROFILE OVER PIPE INV 901.41 EX. 24"SS-115STA 8+41RIM 912.93INV 908.93 12"SS-114STA 6+39RIM 910.51INV 906.31 12"INV 906.31 12"INV 906.31 12"SS-113STA 5+39RIM 909.00INV 905.00 12"INV 905.00 12"SS-112STA 4+17RIM 908.23INV 903.90 12"INV 903.90 12"INV 903.90 21"SS-111STA 3+34RIM 909.07INV 903.63 21"INV 905.92 12"INV 903.63 21"EXMH-3STA 1+90RIM 909.44INV 903.09 21"INV 903.84 12"INV 903.09 18"EXMH-2STA 0+00RIM 908.59INV 901.41 24"INV 902.04 18"202'1.30%12" RCP 100' 1 . 3 0 % 12" RCP 122' 0 . 9 0 % 12" RCP 84' 0.32% 21" RCP 143'0.38%21" RCP 190'0.55%18" RCP 0+00910.9910.6SS-118STA 0+32RIM 910.37INV 906.63 12"SS-114STA 0+00RIM 910.51INV 906.31 12"INV 906.31 12"INV 906.31 12"32' 1.00% 12" RCP 0+00909.1909.2SS-116STA 0+18RIM 909.10INV 906.10 12"SS-111STA 0+00RIM 909.07INV 903.63 21"INV 905.92 12"INV 903.63 21"18' 1.00% 12" RCP 0+00908.6908.2SS-121STA 0+41RIM 907.81INV 901.99 24"SS-119STA 0+09RIM 907.95INV 901.53 24"INV 902.50 12"INV 901.53 24"EXMH-2STA 0+00RIM 908.59INV 901.41 EX. 24"INV 902.04 EX. 18"32' 1.43% 24" RCP, CL 4 9' 1.43% EX. 24" RCP INV 901.41 EX. 24"INV 901.99 EX. 24"0+00 1+00 2+00908.0908.6909.1909.3909.5909.5SS-120STA 2+02RIM 909.02INV 905.02 12"SS-119STA 0+00RIM 907.95INV 901.53 24"INV 902.50 12"INV 901.53 EX. 24"202'1.25%12" RCPSS-110STA 0+11RIM 909.40INV 904.07 12"EXMH-3STA 0+00RIM 909.44INV 903.09 21"INV 903.84 12"INV 903.09 18"11' 2.00% 12" RCP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129C501A-S.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:56:49 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129C501A-SMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/0843507129C501A-SSTORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTSRED OAK DRIVEC5.02-S RED OAK DRIVE S.A.P. 146-241-001 G-A G-A G-B G-B G-C G-C G-D G-D THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION ON THIS PLAN IS SHOWN TO UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LEGEND PROVIDED BELOW. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDLINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDLINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA. UTILITY DESIGNATIONS TO BE AS FOLLOWS: G=NATURAL GAS E-ELECTRIC T=TELEPHONE CTV=CABLE TV FO=FIBER OPTIC OHP=OVERHEAD POWER UTILITY QUALITY LEVELS: QUALITY LEVEL A QUALITY LEVEL B QUALITY LEVEL C QUALITY LEVEL D PRIVATE UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN THE LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY COMPANIES DURING THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAN. NOTE: ALL STORM SEWER IS RCP, CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOTES: 1. SALVAGE EXISTING MAIL BOXES AND POSTS AND RETURN TO EACH HOMEOWNER. 2. INSTALL MAIL BOX CLUSTERS AND POSTS PER STANDARD DETAIL. LEGEND: MAIL BOX POST INDICATES THE LOTS WHICH WILL HAVE A MAIL BOX ON EACH POST WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129C609A-S.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:50:40 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129C609A-SMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/0843507129C609A-SMAILBOX GROUPING PLANC6.09-S 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 PC = 1+28.53PT = 1+73.98PC = 1+94.56PT = 2+404+ 0 0 5+00Red Oak Drive Sherwood RoadHillview RoadFairchild Avenue 4 1 2 2 2 1 2756 2748 2740 8080 2757 2749 2741 7900 807080608040802880168004 796079567950 808180718059 80398025 800979817979795979497901 7970 2725 8075 8085 804580258015800579857975796579557933 1 20+001+002+003+004+004+77.63SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST S R I SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST REMOVE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST FURNISH W3-1 SIGN PANEL FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND POST SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND POST FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND POST FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND POST FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND PANEL FURNISH INSTAL SALVAGE STREET SIGN - BLADES REMOVE STREET SIGN POST FURNISH STREET NAME SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 Red Oak DriveSherwood RoadRed Oak Drive Laport DriveArdan Avenue2 1 8125 2735 2741 2725 8230 8240 827082608250 828182738267826182558135 8145 8155 8165 8175 8211 82208210 820081488142 2740 2 4 4 2 SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST REMOVE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST W3-1 SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND POST SALVAGE STREET SIGN - BLADES REMOVE STREET SIGN POST FURNISH STREET NAME SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST SALVAGE STREET SIGN - BLADES REMOVE STREET SIGN POST STREET NAME SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST FURNISH W1-7 SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND POSTFURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND PANEL FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND PANEL FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND PANEL FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND PANEL FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND PANEL FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND PANEL 11 SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL (STOP) REMOVE STREET SIGN - PANEL (4-WAY) REMOVE STREET SIGN POST FURNISH R1-3 SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND POST WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129T101A-S.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:51:56 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129T101A-SMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/0843507129T101A-S T1.01-SSIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS PLANRED OAK DRIVEREF. 2 --- 4085 LF SAP 146-241-001 RED OAK DRIVEPAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND QUANTITY DESCRIPTION 4" SOLID LINE - WHITE PAINT NOTES: 1. DOUBLE YELLOW LINE INCLUDES (2) 4-INCH LINES PER FOOT. 2. ZEBRA CROSSWALK = 3' x 6' BLOCKS, 6' O.C. 3. SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGNS AS NECESSARY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE - YELLOW PAINT1 4540 LF ZEBRA CROSSWALK - WHITE PAINT 6 ---PAVEMENT MESSAGE (THRU-RIGHT ARROW) - PAINT PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT ARROW) - PAINT --- 5 3 8" DOTTED LINE - WHITE PAINT 4 432 SF T1.02-SSEE SHEETT1.03-SSEE SHEET SEE BELOWSEE ABOVET1.03-SSEE SHEETS.A.P. 146-241-001 CITY PROJECT HILLVIEW ROAD QUANTITY --- 375 LF 440 LF --- --- --- 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 RRed Oak Drive 8456844484348420 8406840083808372836883648340 8312830082908280 8455844384358425 8415840583798373834583318315 8303 8295 8287 83678359 2 1 2 1 SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND PANEL FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND PANEL FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND PANEL FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND PANEL FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND PANEL 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 47+22.11 Red Oak Drive Long Lake Road8494848484748460 84568444 8495 84858475 846584558443 2 1 4 SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST SALVAGE STREET SIGN - BLADES REMOVE STREET SIGN POST FURNISH STREET NAME SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND PANEL FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND PANEL SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129T101A-S.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:52:07 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129T101A-SMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/0843507129T101A-S T1.02-SSIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS PLANRED OAK DRIVET1.04-SSEE SHEETSEE BELOWSEE ABOVES.A.P. 146-241-001 NOTE: 1. SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGNS AS NECESSARY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 0+001+002+003+004+005+00P C = 1 + 2 8 . 5 3 P T = 1 + 7 3 . 9 8 P C = 1 + 9 4 . 5 6 P T = 2 + 4 0 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5 + 0 0 6 + 0 0 7 + 0 0 Hi l l v i e w R o a d Red Oak Drive County Highway 10Silver Lak e R o a d 2 1 6 5 4 6 52 3 REMOVE EXISTING 4" BROKEN WHITE STRIPE PRIOR TO PLACING 8" DOTTED WHITE STRIPE 2711 2791 2757 2749 2741 7900 8 7960 7956 7950 7901 7900 2716 7970 7933 4 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL STREET NAME SIGN AND POST AS NECESSARY SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGNS AND POST Red Oak DriveREMOVE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST FURNISH W3-3 SIGN PANEL INSTALL SIGN AND POST REMOVE RT ARROW REMOVE 4" WHITE STRIPE REMOVE 4" WHITE STRIPE 2 2 2 2 1 SALVAGE SIGN PANELS AND POSTS. DELIVER TO COUNTY. SALVAGE SIGN PANEL AND POST. DELIVER TO COUNTY. SALVAGE SIGN PANEL AND POSTS. DELIVER TO COUNTY. SALVAGE SIGN PANEL AND POST. DELIVER TO COUNTY. SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129T103A-S.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:52:28 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129T103A-SMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/0843507129T103A-S T1.03-SSIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS PLANRED OAK DRIVE/ HILLVIEW RDREF. 2 --- 4200 LF SAP 146-228-005 RED OAK/HILLVIEWPAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND QUANTITY DESCRIPTION 4" SOLID LINE - WHITE PAINT NOTES: 1. DOUBLE YELLOW LINE INCLUDES (2) 4-INCH LINES PER FOOT. 2. DOTTED LINE IS 3' LONG WITH 12' GAPS BETWEEN LINES (15' CYCLE). 3. ZEBRA CROSSWALK = 3' x 6' BLOCKS, 6' O.C. 4. SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGNS AS NECESSARY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE - YELLOW PAINT1 2220 LF ZEBRA CROSSWALK - WHITE PAINT 6 1 EAPAVEMENT MESSAGE (THRU-RIGHT ARROW) - PAINT PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT ARROW) - PAINT 1 EA 5 3 8" DOTTED LINE - WHITE PAINT 4 378 SF T1.01-SSEE SHEETS.A.P. 146-228-005 T1.04-SSEE SHEET T 1 . 0 1 - S S E E S H E E T --- 325 LF CITY PROJECT COUNTY ROAD 10 QUANTITY --- --- --- --- 75 LF 475 LF CITY PROJECT SILVER LAKE RD QUANTITY --- 1 EA 1 EA --- 7 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (HANDICAPPED SYMBOL) - PAINT 2 EA ------ 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00Eastwood RoadGreenwood DriveHillview Road 7930 7900 7935 2665 2655 2649 7900 2625 2617 7930 7917 7901 7900 2656 2648 7886 7876 7891 7885 7866 7880 7895 7867 7890 7870 2624 2616 12 2 12 2 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL STREET NAME SIGN AND POST AS NECESSARY Sunnyside RoadSALVAGE AND REINSTALL STREET NAME SIGN AND POST AS NECESSARY SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST 12 2 20+00 21+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 25+54.81Greenwood DriveLong Lake RoadHILLVIE W PARK 7901 7901 7885 7869 7864 7858 2566 2556 12 2 2 2 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL STREET NAME SIGN AND POST AS NECESSARY SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST REMOVE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST FURNISH R8-3A SIGN PANEL INSTAL SIGN AND POST SALVAGE STREET SIGN - PANEL REMOVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST SALVAGE STREET SIGN - BLADES REMOVE STREET SIGN POST FURNISH STREET NAME SIGN POST INSTALL SIGN AND POST 7 7 WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFSt. Paul Office2335 West Highway 36St. Paul, MN 55113Phone: 651-636-4600Fax: 651-636-1311PRINT NAME:¤SIGNATURE:DATESURVEYAPPROVEDDESIGNEDDRAWNLIC. NO.DATEBONESTROOwww.bonestroo.com K:\435\43507129\Cad\Dwg\43507129T103A-S.dwg Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:52:39 AM20082009-2010 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA43507129T103A-SMRWMSNJRRPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.JOSEPH R. RHEIN2378111/19/08SEE BELOWSEE ABOVET1.03-SSEE SHEETS.A.P. 146-228-005 43507129T103A-S T1.04-SSIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS PLANHILLVIEW ROADNOTES: 1. SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGNS AS NECESSARY. UNLESSS NOTED OTHERWISE. Item No: 07 D1, D2, D3 Meeting Date: 12-22-2008 Type of Business: CB Administrator Review: _____ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Jeremiah Anderson, Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Item Title/Subject: Abatement of Nuisance Code Violations at 8379 Red Oak Dr, 5055-57 Sunnyside Rd, and 2070 Terrace Dr Date of Report: December 16, 2008 Introduction: City staff requests council abatement of three abatement requests. Background: Chapter 607 of the City Code defines and regulates Nuisances. During the month of November 2008, staff responded to reports of exterior accumulation of garbage, junk, and debris in violation of Chapter 607 of the City Code at 8379 Red Oak Drive, 5055-57 Sunnyside Road, and 2070 Terrace Drive. To date, these properties remain in violation of Chapter 607 of the City code. Consistent with City Code, staff is seeking council approval of resolutions to abate (correct) conditions present at these three properties to bring them into compliance with Chapter 607. Discussion: 8379 Red Oak Drive: On November 5, 2008 staff investigated a report of junk and debris in the yard of the single family residence located at 8379 Red Oak Drive. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Jeremiah Anderson observed a large accumulation of auto parts, household furnishings, two vehicles, and other inoperable/unusable equipment outside in the yard. Inspector Anderson spoke with Steve Moe outside 8379 Red Oak Dr and learned that his father Norbert Moe had recently died. Steve told Inspector Anderson that he was in the process of cleaning out his father’s house next door at 8373 Red Oak Drive (currently occupied by his mother Ann Moe). A notice of violation was issued requiring corrective actions completed no later than November 30, 2008 and photographs were obtained. A follow up inspection was conducted on December 1, 2008 and revealed the corrective actions had not been completed. Photographs were obtained and on December 4, 2008 administrative offenses were issued to Ann Moe, owner of 8379 Red Oak Dr, for continued violation of City Code Sections 607.06 Subd. 2c (1)-vehicles parked off and improved surface and 607.03 Subd. 3c-exterior accumulation of junk and inoperable/unusable equipment. On December 4, 2008 staff notified Ann Moe in writing of the intent to seek authorization from the City Council to authorize an abatement of the remaining code violations existing at 8379 Red Oak Drive. Inspector Anderson conducted a reinspection of 8379 Red Oak Drive on December 15, 2008 and obtained photos of the exterior. These photos show very little change from previous inspections. 5055-57 Sunnyside Road: On November 19, 2008 staff inspected the property located at 5055-57 Sunnyside Rd and found both sides of the duplex were vacant. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Jeremiah Anderson observed an accumulation of garbage blowing across the yard, garbage bags, household furnishings, and other debris outside left behind by the former occupant. Inspector Anderson summarily abated the blowing garbage by placing it inside a nearby garbage can and issued a summary abatement order requiring corrective actions completed for the remaining items by November 27, 2008. The City issued one notice of violation in 2006 and two in 2007 for similar code violations at this property. Inspector Anderson completed a follow up inspection on December 1, 2008. This inspection showed that the property was not in compliance. As such, staff issued an Administrative Offense to Steve Oberstar Jr., owner of 5055-57 Sunnyside Rd. On December 4, 2008 staff notified Steve Oberstar Jr. in writing of the intent to seek authorization from the City Council to authorize an abatement of the remaining code violations existing at 8379 Red Oak Drive. Inspector Anderson conducted a reinspection of 5055-57 Sunnyside Rd on December 15, 20008 and obtained photos of the exterior. These photos show no change from the previous inspections. To date staff has received no response to communications from Steve Oberstar regarding this matter. 2070 Terrace Drive: On November 21, 2008 staff inspected the single family home located at 2070 Terrace Drive to follow up on an open code enforcement case regarding junk and debris in the yard and a deteriorated roof on the detached garage. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Jeremiah Anderson observed a mattress adjacent to the detached garage and junk, debris, rusting metal, and inoperable/unusable equipment in the yard. A notice of violation was issued requiring corrective actions were completed no later than December 1, 2008. Inspector Anderson conducted a follow up inspection on December 4, 2008 and noted that the owner had not completed corrective action. On December 4, 2008 staff notified Mary G. Higgins, owner of 2070 Terrace Dr, in writing of the intent to seek authorization from the City Council to authorize an abatement of the remaining code violations existing at 2070 Terrace Dr. Inspector Anderson conducted a reinspection of 2070 Terrace Dr. on December 15, 2008 and obtained photos of the exterior. These photos show no change from the previous inspections. To date staff has received no response to communications from Mary Higgins regarding this matter. Recommendations: Staff is recommending approval of the following resolutions authorizing abatement of Nuisance Code violations: 1. Resolution 7387 Authorizing Abatement of Nuisance Code Violations at 8379 Red Oak Dr. 2. Resolution 7388 Authorizing Abatement of Nuisance Code Violations at 5055-57 Sunnyside Rd. 3. Resolution 7389 Authorizing Abatement of Nuisance Code Violations at 2070 Terrace Dr. Respectfully submitted, Jeremiah Anderson Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Attachments 1. Resolution 7387; Photos, Notices, for 8379 Red Oak Drive 2. Resolution 7388; Photos, Abatement Order, AO Hearing Notice for 5055-57 Sunnyside 3. Resolution 7389; Photos, Notices, for 2070 Terrace Dr Item No: 07E Meeting Date: December 22, 2008 Type of Business: CB City Administrator Review: _____ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Desaree Crane, Assistant City Clerk-Administrator Item Title/Subject: Resolution 7383 Appointing Members to Various Mounds View Commissions and Committees The Park, Recreation and Forestry Commission, Planning Commission, Police Civil Service Commission and the Streets and Utilities Committee have term seats, which will expire on December 31, 2008. Park and Recreation and Forestry Commission Gerald Arel December 31, 2008 Dale Aukee December 31, 2008 David Long December 31, 2008 Planning Commission Gary Stevenson December 31, 2008 Jean Miller December 31, 2008 Gary Meehlhause December 31, 2008 Sherry Gunn December 31, 2010 (seat to be vacated on December 31, 2008 due to her election to the City Council) Police Civil Service Virgil Beyer December 31, 2008 Dale Federer December 31, 2008 Streets and Utilities Committee Russ Warren December 31, 2008 Staff did receive applications from Gerald Arel, Dale Aukee, David Long, Virgil Beyer, Dale Federer, Gary Rundle, Gary Stevenson, Jean Miller and Gary Meehlhause to renew their terms. Russ Warren did not wish to renew his term on the Streets and Utilities Committee. There will be an additional opening in the Planning Commission due to Sherry Gunn’s election to the City Council starting in January 2009. In addition to these applications, Staff received applications from Nathan Bjerke, Paul Schiltgen, and Betty Johnson. Mr. Bjerke is interested in the Streets and Utilities Committee; Mr. Schiltgen is interested in the Planning Commission or the Park, Recreation and Forestry Commission; and Ms. Johnson is interested in any of the Commission and Committees. The Police Civil Service Commission and the Streets and Utilities Committee did not meet in December, and therefore no recommendations were made by them. The Park, Recreation and Forestry Commission met on December 18, 2008, and reviewed five applications: Gerald Arel, Dale Aukee, David Long, Paul Schiltgen and Betty Johnson. The Park, Recreation and Forestry Committee recommended Gerald Arel, Dale Aukee, and David Long to the Park, Recreation and Forestry Commission. In addition, the Commission recommended Gerald Arel as the Chair and Dale Aukee as the Vice Chair of this Commission. . Staff received six applications to the Planning Commission: Gary Stevenson, Jean Miller, Gary Meehlhause, Gary Rundle, Paul Schiltgen, and Betty Johnson. On December 3, 2008, the Planning Commission voted to recommend Gary Stevenson (3 year term), Jean Miller (3 year term), Gary Meehlhause (3 year term), and Gary Rundle (2 year term – to finish Sherry Gunn’s term). Staff received three applications for the Police Civil Service Commission: Virgil Beyer, Dale Federer, and Betty Johnson (the Police Civil Service Commission was Ms. Johnson’s 5th choice). The Police Civil Service Commission did not meet in December, and therefore no recommendations were made by them. This Commission only meets on an “as needed” basis. Staff received two applications to the Streets and Utilities Committee: Nathan Bjerke and Betty Johnson (the Streets and Utilities Committee was Ms. Johnson’s 4th choice). The Streets and Utilities Committee did not meet in December, and therefore could not make a recommendation. Recommendation: Attached are all the submitted applications to these Commissions/Committees. I t is recommended that the City Council consider these applications, and approve appointments to their respective commission. Attached is Resolution 7383 for your consideration. I left the Police Civil Service Commission and the Streets and Utilities Committee blank on the Resolution because no recommendations were able to be made by that Commission/Committee. The City Council may also elect to not accept the recommendations from the Commissions and appoint other candidates as it may see fit. Respectfully submitted, Desaree Crane RESOLUTION NO. 7383 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA REAPPOINTING MEMBER TO VARIOUS MOUNDS VIEW COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES WHEREAS, Mounds View Board, Commission and Committees consist of members appointed by the City Council; and WHEREAS, there will be vacant seats effective December 31, 2008, in the Park and Recreation and Forestry Commission, Planning Commission, Police Civil Service Commission and the Streets and Utilities Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City Council does hereby approve the following Mounds View residents to serve on the Park and Recreation and Forestry Commission: Name Term Expiration (3-Year Term) Gerald Arel December 31, 2011 Dale Aukee December 31, 2011 David Long December 31, 2011 The City Council also hereby approves Gerald Arel as the Chair and Dale Aukee as Vice Chair of the Park Recreation and Forestry Commission. 2. The City Council does hereby approve the following Mounds View residents to serve on the Planning Commission: Name Term Expiration (3-Year Term) Gary Stevenson December 31, 2011 Jean Miller December 31, 2011 Gary Meehlhause December 31, 2011 Gary Rundle December 31, 2010 (two year term) 3 The City Council does hereby approve the following Mounds View residents to serve on the Police Civil Service Commission. Name Term Expiration (3-Year Term) __________________________ _____________________________ __________________________ _____________________________ 4. The City Council does hereby approve the following Mounds View resident to serve on the Streets and Utilities Committee. Name Term Expiration (3-Year Term) __________________________ _____________________________ Adopted this 22nd day of December, 2008. _____________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ James Ericson, Clerk-Administrator (seal) Item No. 07F Meeting Date: December 22, 2008 Type of Business: CB City Administrator Review _______ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Desaree Crane, Assistant City Clerk-Administrator Item Title/Subject: Resolution 7384 Setting the 2009 Meeting Dates for City Council Meeting Dates, Staff Retreat and the 2009 Town Hall Meeting DISCUSSION: Based on the Council’s schedule of conducting meetings, Work Sessions are normally scheduled for the first Monday of each month and Council meetings on the second and fourth Mondays of each month. Attached is a proposed list of Work Session and City Council Meeting dates for 2009. Two legal holidays fall on dates that would otherwise be considered Council meetings— Memorial Day (Monday, May 25, 2009), and Labor Day (September 7, 2009). For these dates, the schedule reflects a Tuesday. In addition to setting the official calendar, Staff would like to discuss dates for the Council/Staff Retreat and the Town Hall Meeting. Don Salvarda & Associates are available for the Council Staff/Retreat on Monday, February 16th and Tuesday, February 17th (evenings); and also on Friday, February 20th (in the evening) and Saturday, February 21st (in the morning). Completing the Council/Staff Retreat in February will allow enough time for Staff to prepare a presentation for the Town Hall Meeting. The Town Hall Meeting is currently scheduled for Saturday, April 25th from 9am to 12pm at the Mounds View Community Center. The Mounds View Community Center is reserved for the Town Hall Meeting on that date, and staff will start the process of planning this event in February. RECOMMENDATION: Reschedule the meetings that fall on the identified holidays and adopt Resolution 7384 setting the 2009 Meeting Dates for City Council Meetings and Work Sessions. Respectfully Submitted, Desaree Crane RESOLUTION NO. 7384 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW OFFICIAL 2009 MEETING CALENDAR FOR THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 412.191 requires that City Councils set an official calendar for Council Meetings; and WHEREAS, the City’s Charter states that the City Council shall meet regularly at least twice monthly as they may designate by ordinance; and WHEREAS, Chapter 105 of the Mounds View City Code states that regular meetings of the City Council shall be held on the second and fourth Monday of every month at 7:00 p.m.; and WHEREAS, the City Council has traditionally scheduled Work Sessions on the first Monday of the month; and WHEREAS, the City’s Code further state that if that Monday is a legal holiday the meeting shall be canceled or held on another date and time; and WHEREAS, May 25, 2009 (Memorial Day), falls on a Monday that would otherwise be a regular scheduled Council Meeting; and WHEREAS, September 7, 2009 (Labor Day) falls on a Monday that would otherwise be a regularly scheduled Work Session meeting; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the City Code, these meetings dates have been rescheduled to May 26, 2009, and September 8, 2009. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council does hereby establish the Official City of Mounds View City Council Meeting Calendar for the year 2009 as shown in Exhibit A and that unless otherwise posted, all City Council meetings are to begin at 7:00 pm. Adopted this 22nd day of December, 2008. ____________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ Jim Ericson, Clerk-Administrator (SEAL) EXHIBIT A WORK SESSIONS COUNCIL MEETINGS January 05 January 05 (Special) January 12 January 26 February 02 February 09 February 23 March 02 March 09 March 23 April 06 April 13 April 27 May 04 May 11 May 26 (Tuesday) June 01 June 08 June 22 July 06 July 13 July 27 August 03 August 10 August 24 September 08 (Tuesday) September 14 September 28 October 05 October 12 October 26 November 02 November 09 November 23 December 07 December 14 December 28 1 LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW AND LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. (Local 232) January 1, 2008 2006 to December 31, 2009 2007 12/18/08 Final Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ARTICLE 1: PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT is entered into as of January 1, 2006 between the CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, hereinafter called the EMPLOYER, and the LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. (LOCAL NO. 232), hereinafter called the UNION. It is the intent and purpose of this AGREEMENT to: 1.1 Establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning this AGREEMENT’S interpretation and/or application; and 1.2 Place in written form the parties’ agreement upon terms and conditions of employment for the duration of this AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 2: RECOGNITION 2.1 The EMPLOYER recognizes the UNION as the exclusive representative under Minnesota Statutes, Section 179A.12, Subdivision 8, for all police personnel in the following job classification: Sergeants 2.2 In the event the EMPLOYER and the UNION are unable to agree as to the inclusion or exclusion of a new or modified job class, the issue shall be submitted to the Bureau of Mediation Services for determination. ARTICLE 3: DEFINITIONS 3.1 UNION: The Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. (Local No.232). 3.2 UNION MEMBER: A member of the Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. (Local No.232). 3.3 EMPLOYEE: A member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit. 3.4 DEPARTMENT: The City of Mounds View Police Department. 3.5 EMPLOYER: The City of Mounds View. 3.6 CHIEF: The Chief of the Mounds View Police Department. 3.7 UNION OFFICER: Officer elected or appointed by Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. (LELS). 3.8 OVERTIME: Work performed at the express authorization of the EMPLOYER in excess of the employee’s SCHEDULED SHIFT. 2 3.9 SCHEDULED A consecutive work period including rest breaks and a lunch break. SHIFT: 3.10 REST BREAKS: Periods during the SCHEDULED SHIFT during which the employee remains on continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties. 3.11 LUNCH BREAK: A period during the SCHEDULED SHIFT during which the employee remains on continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties. 3.12 STRIKE: Concerted action in failing to report for duty, the willful absence from one’s position, the stoppage of work, slow-down, or abstinence in whole or part from the full, faithful and proper performance of the duties of employment for the purposes of inducing, influencing or coercing a change in the conditions or compensation or the rights, privileges or obligations of employment. ARTICLE 4: EMPLOYER SECURITY The UNION agrees that during the life of this AGREEMENT that the UNION will not cause, encourage, participate in or support any strike, slow-down or other interruption of or interference with the normal functions of the EMPLOYER. ARTICLE 5: EMPLOYER AUTHORITY 5.1 The EMPLOYER retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all manpower, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organizational structure; to select, direct and determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically limited by this AGREEMENT. 5.2 Any term and condition of employment not specifically established or modified by this AGREEMENT shall remain solely within the discretion of the EMPLOYER to modify, establish or eliminate. ARTICLE 6: UNION SECURITY 6.1 The EMPLOYER shall deduct from the wages of employees who authorize such a deduction in writing an amount necessary to cover monthly UNION dues. Such monies shall be remitted as directed by the UNION. 6.2 The UNION may designate employees from the bargaining unit to act as Steward and an alternate and shall inform the EMPLOYER in writing of such designation and changes in the position of Steward and/or alternate. 3 6.3 The EMPLOYER shall make space available on the employee bulletin board for posting UNION notice(s) and announcement(s). 6.4 The UNION agrees to indemnify and hold the EMPLOYER harmless against any and all claims, suits, orders, or judgments brought or issued against the EMPLOYER as a result of any action taken or not taken by the EMPLOYER under the provisions of this Article. ARTICLE 7: EMPLOYEE RIGHTS - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 7.1 Definition of Grievance A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT. 7.2 Union Representatives The EMPLOYER will recognize representatives designated by the UNION as the grievance representatives of the bargaining unit having the duties and responsibilities established by the Article. The UNION shall notify the EMPLOYER in writing of the name of such UNION representatives and of their successors when so designated as provided by 6.2 of this AGREEMENT. 7.3 Processing of a Grievance It is recognized and accepted by the UNION and the EMPLOYER that the processing of grievances as hereinafter provided is limited by the job duties and responsibilities of the employees and shall therefore be accomplished during normal working hours only when consistent with such employee duties and responsibilities. The aggrieved employee and a UNION representative shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time without loss of pay when a grievance is investigated and presented to the EMPLOYER during normal working hours provided that the employee and the UNION Representative have notified and received the approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work programs of the EMPLOYER. 7.4 Procedure Grievances, as defined by Section 7.1 shall be resolved in conformance with the following procedure: Step 1. An employee claiming a violation concerning the interpretation or application of the AGREEMENT shall, within twenty-one (21) calendar days after such alleged violation has occurred, present such grievance to the employee’s supervisor as designated by the EMPLOYER. The EMPLOYER-designated representative will discuss and give an answer to such Step 1 grievance within ten (10) calendar days after receipt. A grievance not resolved in Step 1 and appealed to Step 2 shall be placed in 4 writing setting forth the nature of the grievance, the facts on which it is based, the provision or provisions of the AGREEMENT, allegedly violated, the remedy requested, and shall be appealed to Step 2 within ten (10) calendar days after the EMPLOYER-designated representative(s) final answer in Step 1. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 2 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 2. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the UNION and discussed with the Chief of Police. The Chief of Police shall give the UNION the EMPLOYER’S Step 2 answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 2 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 2 may be appealed to Step 3 within ten (10) calendar days following the Chief of Police’s final Step 2 answer. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 3 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 3. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the UNION and discussed with the City Clerk-Administrator EMPLOYER-designated Step 3 Representative. The City Clerk-Administrator shall give the UNION the EMPLOYER’S answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 3 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step 4 within ten (10) calendar days following the City Clerk-Administrator’s final answer to Step 3. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 3.a. If the grievance is not resolved at Step 3of the grievance procedure, the parties, by mutual agreement, may submit the matter to mediation with the Bureau of Mediation Services. Submitting the grievance to mediation preserves timeliness for Step 4 of the grievance procedure. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days of mediation shall be considered waived. Step 4. A grievance unresolved in Step 3 and appealed to Step 4 by the UNION shall be submitted to arbitration subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971, as amended. The selection of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the “Rules Governing the Arbitration of Grievances” as established by the Bureau of Mediation Services. 7.5 Arbitrator’s Authority A. The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, modify, nullify, ignore, add to, or subtract from the terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT. The arbitrator shall consider and decide only the specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the EMPLOYER and the UNION and shall have no authority to make decisions on any other issue not so submitted. 5 B. The arbitrator shall be without power to make decisions contrary to, or inconsistent with, or modifying or varying in any way the application of laws, rules, or regulations having the force and effect of the law. The arbitrator’s decision shall be submitted in writing within thirty (30) days following close of the hearing or the submission of briefs by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties agree to an extension. The decision shall be binding on both the EMPLOYER and the UNION and shall be based solely on the arbitrator’s interpretation or application of the express terms of this AGREEMENT and to the facts of the grievance presented. C. The fees and expenses for the arbitrator’s services and proceedings shall be borne equally by the EMPLOYER and the UNION provided that each party shall be responsible for compensating its own representatives and witnesses. If either party desires a verbatim record of the proceedings, it may cause such a record to be made, providing it pays for the record. If both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedings, the cost shall be shared equally. 7.6 Waiver If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered “waived.” If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the specified time limit or any agreed extension thereof it shall be considered settled on the basis of the EMPLOYER’S last answer. If the EMPLOYER does not answer a grievance or an appeal thereof within the specified time limits, the UNION may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that step and immediately appeal the grievance to the next step. The time limit in each step may be extended by mutual written agreement of the EMPLOYER and the UNION in each step. 7.7 Choice of Remedy If, as a result of the written EMPLOYER response in Step 3 of the grievance remains unresolved, and if the grievance involves discipline of an employee who has completed the required probationary period, the grievance may be appealed either to Step 4 of Article 7 or other appeal procedure such as Civil Service, Veterans Preference, or other employment laws. If appealed to another appeal procedure the grievance is not subject to the arbitration procedure as provided in Step 4 of Article 7. The aggrieved employee shall indicate in writing which procedure is to be utilized - Step 4 of Article 7 or Civil Service - and shall sign a statement to the effect that the choice precludes the aggrieved employee from making a subsequent appeal through Step 4 of Article 7. The election set for the above shall not apply to claims subject to the jurisdiction of the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 6 ARTICLE 8: SAVINGS CLAUSE This AGREEMENT is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota and the City of Mounds View. In the event any provision of this AGREEMENT shall be held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provisions shall be voided. All other provisions of this AGREEMENT shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provision may be renegotiated at the written request of either party. ARTICLE 9: PROBATIONARY PERIODS 9.1 All newly hired or rehired employees will serve a twelve (12) months’ probationary period. At any time during the probationary period a newly hired or rehired employee may be terminated at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. 9.2 All employees will serve a six (6) months’ probationary period in any job classification in which the employee has not served a probationary period. 9.3 At any time during the probationary period a newly hired or rehired employee may be terminated at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. 9.4 At any time during the probationary period a promoted or reassigned employee may be demoted or reassigned to the employee’s previous position at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. ARTICLE 10: SENIORITY 10.1 Seniority shall be determined by the employee’s length of continuous employment as a sergeant in the Mounds View Police Department. Seniority rosters may be maintained by the Chief on the basis of time in grade and time within specific classifications. 10.2 A reduction of work force will be accomplished on the basis of seniority. Employees shall be recalled from layoff on the basis of seniority. An employee on layoff shall have an opportunity to return to work within two years of the time of the employee’s layoff before any new employee is hired. 10.3 Senior employees will be given preference with regard to transfer, job classification assignments and promotions when the job-relevant qualifications of employees are equal. 10.4 Senior qualified employees shall be given shift assignment preference. 7 ARTICLE 11: DISCIPLINE 11.1 The EMPLOYER will discipline employees for just cause only. Discipline will be in one or more of the following forms: a) oral reprimand; b) written reprimand; c) suspension; d) demotion; or e) discharge 11.2 Suspensions, demotions and discharges will be in written form. 11.3 Written reprimands, notices of suspension, and notices of discharge which are to become part of an employee’s personnel file shall be read and acknowledged by signature of the employee. Employees and the UNION will receive a copy of such reprimands and/or notices. 11.4 Employees may examine their own individual personnel files at reasonable times under the direct supervision of the EMPLOYER. 11.5 Discharges will be preceded by a five (5) day suspension without pay. 11.6 Employees will not be questioned concerning an investigation of disciplinary action unless the employee has been given an opportunity to have a UNION representative present at such questioning. 11.7 Grievances relating to this Article shall be initiated by the UNION in Step 3 of the grievance procedure under ARTICLE VII. ARTICLE 12: CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION Employees shall have the rights granted to all citizens of the United States and Minnesota State Constitutions. ARTICLE 13: WORK SCHEDULES 13.1 The normal work year is two thousand and eighty (2,080) hours to be accounted for by each employee through: a) hours worked on assigned shifts; b) holidays; c) assigned training: d) authorized leave time 8 13.2 Holidays and authorized leave time is to be calculated on the basis of the actual length of time of the assigned shifts. 13.3 Nothing contained in this or any other Article shall be interpreted to be a guarantee of a minimum or maximum number of hours the EMPLOYER may assign employees. ARTICLE 14: OVERTIME 14.1 Employees will be compensated at one and on-half (1 ½) times the employees’ regular base rate for hours worked in excess of the employee’s regularly scheduled shift. Changes of shifts do not qualify an employee for overtime under this Article. 14.2 Overtime will be distributed as equally as practicable. 14.3 Overtime refused by employees will for record purposes under Article 14.2 by considered an unpaid overtime worked. 14.4 For the purposes of computing overtime compensation, overtime hours worked shall not be pyramided, compounded or paid twice for the same hours worked. 14.5 Overtime will be calculated to the nearest fifteen (15) minutes. 14.6 Employees have the obligation to work overtime or call backs if requested by the EMPLOYER unless unusual circumstances prevent the employee for so working. 14.7 Employees may take compensatory time in lieu of overtime pay. Compensatory time may be accumulated up to fifty-two and one half hours (52.5). ARTICLE 15: COURT DUTY 15.1 An employee who is required to appear in Court during the employee’s scheduled off- duty time shall receive a minimum of three (3) hours pay at one and one-half (1 ½) times the employee’s base pay rate. An extension or early report to a regularly scheduled shift for Court appearances does not qualify the employee for Court time. 15.2 Employees notified by the employer/court to be on court standby status will be compensated a total of three hours based upon the employee’s normal hourly rate for each day the employee is to standby for court duty but not called for court. A summons to court on a standby day will preclude standby pay. 15.3 The three hour court/standby compensation will not be given unless the employee contacts the court line the evening prior to scheduled appearance between the hours of 1530 and 1630 hours to verify status, and duly reports such on the Court/Standby request. 9 ARTICLE 16: WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION Employees assigned by the EMPLOYER to assume the full responsibilities and authority of a higher job classification shall receive the salary schedule for the higher classification for the duration of the assignment. ARTICLE 17: INSURANCE 17.1 The EMPLOYER will contribute to each employee per month a maximum amount equal to eighty percent (80%) of the lowest cost family health insurance for employee and family health insurance and basic life insurance. The EMPLOYER will contribute a maximum amount of $782.20 per month in 2008 and a maximum amount of $832.20 per month in 2009 to each full-time permanent employee, for group health, dental, and life insurance including dependant coverage. 17.2 Employees may designate any unused portion of the EMPLOYER contribution amount to provide dental coverage and/or supplemental life insurance offered according to established guidelines through the City’s plans. 17.3 The EMPLOYER will contribute a maximum amount of $685.20 per month in 2006 to each full-time permanent employee, for group health, dental, and life insurance including dependant coverage. 17.4 The EMPLOYER will contribute a maximum amount of $732.20 per month in 2007 to each full-time permanent employee, for group health, dental and life insurance including dependant coverage. ARTICLE 18 STANDBY PAY Employees required by the EMPLOYER to standby shall be compensated for such standby time at the rate of 1 hour compensatory time off for each hour on standby. ARTICLE 18 19: UNIFORMS The City shall provide a uniform allowance of $690.00 for 2006, and $710.00 for 2007 2008 and 2009. ARTICLE 19 20: VACATION 19.1 Vacation Pay: If an employee desires vacation pay in advance of vacation, the employee must give the EMPLOYER at least three weeks notice in writing. 19.2 Carry Over and Waiver of Vacation Leave: Ten days of vacation plus the amount accrued up to December 31st of the previous year may be carried over into the next year, provided that time be used no later than April 30th of the following year. 10 19.3 Consecutive Vacation Days: If the employee is entitled to two weeks vacation, the employee must take one week consecutively. If an employee is entitled to three or four weeks vacation, the employee must take two weeks with five (5) day blocks or greater. 20.4 Vacation Schedule: Vacation will be granted employees according to the following schedule: 1 through 5 years 10 days After 5 years through 10 years 15 days After 11 years 16 days After 12 years 17 days After 13 years 18 days After 14 years 19 days After 15 years 20 days After 20 years 25 days 19.4 One continuous vacation period shall be selected on the basis of seniority until May 1st of each calendar year. 19.5 After May 1st vacation shall be awarded on a first come first serve basis. Vacation requests shall be submitted no more than 30 days in advance. Vacation requests can be submitted more than 30 days in advance with the specific permission of the Chief. In the event any employee group receives additional vacation leave in excess of leave listed in 18.4 this bargaining unit shall receive the same increase. 20.7 Probationary employees that are new hires are not entitled to use accrued vacation until completion of their sixth month of employment. ARTICLE 20 21: SICK LEAVE 20.1 Eligibility: Sick Leave with Pay. Any employee who has been continuously employed for a period of one year or longer may in any calendar year be granted sick leave not to exceed thirteen (13) working days with full pay. An employee may borrow up to thirty (30) days of sick leave with the approval of and under conditions set out by the EMPLOYER. Sick leave is defined to mean the absence of an employee because of illness, exposure to contagious disease, attendance of such employee of a member of the employee’s immediate family requiring the care or attendance of such employee, or death in the immediate family of the employee. The EMPLOYER may in any case require evidence in the form of a certificate from the employee’s physician for verification of the reason for any employee’s absence during the time for which sick leave is granted. 20.2 Accrual and Use. Sick leave may be accumulated to a maximum of 120 days. 20.3 Proof Required. In order to be eligible for sick leave with pay an employee must: 11 a. Report promptly to the employee’s department head no later than 30 minutes before the start of the shift the reason for such absence. b. Keep the department head informed of the employee’s condition, if the absence is more than three (3) days duration. c. Submit a medical certificate for any absence exceeding three (3) days if required by the EMPLOYER. d. Penalty. Claiming sick leave when physically fit, except as permitted in this section, may be cause for disciplinary action, including transfer, suspension, demotion or dismissal. e. A regular employee who meets the other requirements of this section and who receives Workers Compensation payments shall be granted accrued sick leave pay in the amount of the difference between Workers Compensation payments and the employee’s net salary. 20.4 Other leave may be granted in accordance with the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) as appropriate. ARTICLE 21 22: SEVERANCE PAY 21.1 Upon separation from employment with the City, employees with less than twenty (20) years of service and leave in good standing will receive a lump-sum taxable severance compensation for all accrued vacation and compensatory time. 21.2 Upon separation from employment with the City, employees with twenty (20) or more years of service and leave in good standing shall direct 100% of any vacation and compensatory time balances to Retirement Health Savings Plan (RHSP), as provided in Article 22. 21.3 Upon separation, all employees shall direct eligible sick leave balances to their RHSP, as provided in Article 22. 22.1 Any employee who has accumulated a minimum of 960 hours of sick leave as of January 1, 2005 will be eligible to contribute sixty-five percent (65%) of the employee’s accumulated and banked sick leave for contribution to the employee’s Retirement Health Savings plan. (Note - This provision moved to the RHSP Article.) Employees who have not accumulated a minimum of 960 hours of sick leave as of January 1, 2005, will be covered by the Retirement Health Savings language of Section 21.2 22.1. (Note - This provision moved to the RHSP Article.) 12 ARTICLE 22: 22.2 RETIREMENT HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN 22.1 The City of Mounds View offers its employees a Retirement Health Savings Plan pursuant to Internal Revenue Code regulations through a third party administrator selected by the City. Future changes in the Internal Revenue Code regulations may change the tax status of this plan and the City shall not be liable for such changes. Contribution to the Plan shall occur according to the following provisions: A. Employees who have completed two or more years of service and leave in good standing shall direct their eligible sick leave compensation to the Plan. Eligible sick leave shall be computed based on years of completed service, less any elected annual contributions, computed according to the table in Appendix B, at a conversion rate of two for one (50%). (Employees who separate with less than two years of completed service are not eligible to be compensated for any accrued sick leave.) B. Employees who had accumulated 960 or more hours of sick leave as of January 1, 2005 are not subject to the computation table in Appendix B. Rather, any such employee shall direct sixty-five percent (65%) of their remaining sick leave compensation to the Plan. C. Upon separation from employment with the City, employees with twenty (20) or more years of service and leave in good standing shall direct 100% of any vacation and compensatory time balances to the Plan. Employees with less than twenty (20) years of service and leave in good standing will receive a lump-sum taxable severance compensation for all remaining vacation and compensatory time as provided for in Article 21.1. The employee is responsible for enrolling in the plan and designate a beneficiary during a regularly scheduled open enrollment period prior to termination of their employment. The following contributions will be allowed to the Retirement Health Savings Plan: A. Upon separation from employment with the City, an employee may contribute their compensation for accrued vacation and compensatory time. Employees who have completed two years of service and leave in good standing may also contribute fifty percent (50%) of unused sick leave calculated against a maximum accumulation of 960 hours. Additional bank sick leave hours will not be computed for the contribution. B. An employee may elect to contribute a percentage of their annual pay to the plan on a pre-tax basis. Once this election is made, it can never be changed. C. An employee may elect to make an after-tax contribution of their annual pay to the plan. This election may be changed each year, but is limited to 25% of total contributions to the plan by all employees. 13 D. An employee may annually elect to contribute a portion of their sick leave balance to the plan. The employee would have to maintain a minimum balance of 480 hours of sick leave after the contribution and would be allowed to convert up to 160 hours of sick leave into 80 hours of RHS contribution per year at a 2 to 1 rate. This election may be changed each year. 21.3 An employee will be compensated for accrued vacation and compensatory time upon separation. ARTICLE 23: HOLIDAYS All employees shall receive the following holidays: New Years Day, Martin Luther King Day, Presidents Day, Good Friday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Day after Thanksgiving and Christmas Day. Employees assigned to work on these holidays shall receive an extra one-half hour of pay for any hours worked. ARTICLE 24: INJURY ON DUTY Employees injured during the performance of their duties for the EMPLOYER and thereby rendered unable to work for the EMPLOYER will be paid the difference between the employee’s regular pay and Worker’s Compensation insurance payments for a period not to exceed ninety (90) working days per injury, not charged to the employee’s vacation, sick leave or other accumulated paid benefits, after a three (3) working day initial waiting period per injury. The three (3) working day waiting period shall be charged to the employee’s sick leave account less Workers Compensation insurance payments. Employees drawing Workers Compensation benefits will not receive supplementary IOD pay or sick leave pay which provides for more after tax take-home pay than the employee made while working. ARTICLE 25 CAFETERIA PLAN The EMPLOYER will evaluate, and if feasible within federal and state laws and Internal Revenue Service regulations, implement a Cafeteria Plan benefit program. ARTICLE 25 26: WAIVER 25.1 The parties mutually acknowledge that during the negotiations, which resulted in this AGREEMENT, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any term or condition of employment not removed by law from bargaining. All agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are set forth in writing in this AGREEMENT for the stipulated duration of this AGREEMENT. The EMPLOYER and the UNION each voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives the right to meet and negotiate regarding any and all terms and conditions of this employment referred to or covered in this AGREEMENT or with respect to any term or condition of employment not specifically referred to or covered in the AGREEMENT or with respect to any term or condition of employment not specifically referred to or covered by this AGREEMENT, even though such terms or conditions may not have been within the 14 knowledge or contemplation of either or both of the parties at the time this contract was negotiated or executed. ARTICLE 26 27: POST LICENSES The EMPLOYER will pay $90.00 toward the cost of maintaining POST licensure. ARTICLE 27 28: DURATION This AGREEMENT shall be effective as of January 1, 2008 2006, and shall remain in full force and effect until the thirty-first day of December 31, 2009 2007. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT on this ___ day of ______________________, 200__ 2006. FOR THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW FOR L.E.L.S. 15 APPENDIX A: WAGES Effective January 1, 2008 2006 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Starting After 6 months After 12 months After 24 months After 36 months $27.70 $29.39 $29.43 $31.22 $31.16 $33.05 $32.89 $34.90 $34.62 $36.73 Effective January 1, 2009 2007 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Starting After 6 months After 12 months After 24 months After 36 months $28.53 $30.27 $30.31 $32.16 $32.09 $34.04 $33.88 $35.95 $35.66 $37.83 16 APPENDIX B: Maximum Sick Leave Hours Eligible for Employee’s Retirement Health Savings Plan Completed Years of Service Annual Accrual Max Annual Hours Eligible for Plan Max Cumulative Hours Eligible for Plan* Rate of Transfer = 50% 1 96 (not eligible) (not eligible) (not eligible) 2 96 96 192 81 3 96 96 288 144 4 96 96 384 192 5 96 96 480 240 6 96 96 576 288 7 96 96 672 336 8 96 96 768 384 9 96 96 864 432 10 96 96 960 480 11 96 20 980 490 12 96 20 1000 500 13 96 20 1020 510 14 96 20 1040 520 15 96 20 1060 530 16 96 20 1080 540 17 96 20 1100 550 18 96 20 1120 560 19 96 20 1140 570 20 96 20 1160 580 21 96 20 1180 590 22 96 20 1200 600 23 96 20 1220 610 24 96 20 1240 620 25 96 20 1260 630 26 96 20 1280 640 27 96 20 1300 650 28 96 20 1320 660 29 96 20 1340 670 30 96 20 1360 680 31 96 20 1380 690 32 96 20 1400 700 33 96 20 1420 710 34 96 20 1440 720 35 96 20 1460 730 * Hours directed to the Plan on an annual basis, if such option is utilized, shall be deducted from the maximum cumulative eligible for purposes of Plan contribution upon separation. Sick leave balances in excess of the Eligible Hours as noted herein are not available for reimbursement, payout or deposit into the plan or as severance in any form. Item No: 07H Meeting Date: Dec 22, 2008 Type of Business: Council Business City Administrator Review: Yes City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: James Ericson, Clerk-Administrator Item Title/Subject: Resolution 7392 Approving the 2008-2009 Labor Agreement with Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. Local 232 (Sergeants) Background: The City has been meeting with Local 232 of LELS which represents the Mounds View Sergeants in an effort to formalize a labor agreement for 2008 and 2009. At the last possible opportunity, the City and the Sergeants came to an agreement on the terms of the 2008 – 2009 labor agreement. Discussion: The revised contract includes the following provisions: Wages: 3.0% January 1, 2008 3.0% January 1, 2009 Insurance: 2008 Employer Contribution - $782.20 2009 Employer Contribution – $832.20 This is the same amount offered to non-union personnel and accepted by Public Works, AFSCME and LELS 204. Uniform Allowance: no increase. Retirement Health Savings Plan In addition to the standard RHSP language with the floating cap of an extra 20 hours eligible for payout per year of completed service beyond ten years (provision applicable for only one of the three Sergeants), the group elected to contribute 100 percent of their sick leave to the RHSP at separation. Employees who separate with less than twenty years of service would receive vacation and comp time as a taxable lump sum severance, while those with twenty or more years of service would direct vacation and comp time into their RHSP. Holiday Language No change. Duration January 1, 2008 – December 31, 2009. Wage and insurance contribution adjustments will be made retroactive to January 1, 2008. 2008-2009 LELS 232 Agreement December 22, 2008 Page 2 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution 7392 approving the 2008 - 2009 Labor Agreement with LELS Local 232 representing the Sergeants. Respectfully submitted, ________________________ James Ericson Clerk Administrator RESOLUTION 7392 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2008 - 2009 LABOR AGREEMENT WITH LELS LOCAL 232 REPRESENTUING THE SERGEANTS WHEREAS, the labor agreement between the City of Mounds View and LELS Local 232 expired at the end of 2007; and, WHEREAS, the City has been in negotiations with LELS in the preparation of a new contract to cover the term from 2008 through the end of 2009; and, WHEREAS, in addition to other minor changes and language revisions, the following represents the significant changes incorporated into the proposed 2008-2009 labor agreement: 2008 Wages: increase 3% 2009 Wages: increase 3% 2008 Health Insurance Contribution $782 per month 2009 Health Insurance Contribution $832 per month NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ratify the labor agreement for and with Local 232 of Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., effective for two years from January 1, 2008 until December 31, 2009. Adopted this 22nd day of December, 2008. ________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ James Ericson, Clerk-Administrator (SEAL) Item No: 08A Meeting Date: December 22, 2008 Type of Business: CA City Administrator Review: __________ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Barb Benesch, Community Development Technician Item Title/Subject: CONTRACTOR LICENSES FOR APPROVAL – 2009 RENEWALS Please consider the following contractor licenses for approval. All contractor licenses will expire on December 31, 2009. All applicants have submitted appropriate fees, Minnesota Worker’s Comp and Tax forms and proof of insurance. Those companies that are “new” include applicants that have never been licensed with the City or they may have been licensed with the City in the past, but were not licensed in 2008. The majority of the licenses are renewals, so at a minimum, they were licensed in 2008. The type of City license they are applying for follows the company name. AIR MECHANICAL HVAC RENEWAL ALPINE ASPHALT, INC. ASPHALT RENEWAL ASPEN EXTERIORS GENERAL COMMERCIAL RENEWAL AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR & FIREPL HVAC RENEWAL BONFE’S PLUMBING & HEATING HVAC RENEWAL CENTRAIRE HEATING & AIR COND., INC. HVAC RENEWAL CHEYENNE PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. HVAC NEW CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR SIGN RENEWAL DMJ CORPORATION ASPHALT RENEWAL FAIRCON SERVICE COMPANY HVAC NEW FEDTECH, INC. GENERAL COMMERCIAL RENEWAL G & H HEATING & AIR HVAC NEW HINDING COMPANY HEATING & AIR HVAC NEW HOME ENERGY CENTER HVAC RENEWAL HOME EQUITY INC. GENERAL COMMERCIAL NEW HORWITZ, INC. HVAC RENEWAL KATH HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING HVAC RENEWAL KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO. GENERAL COMMERCIAL RENEWAL KRINKIE HEATING HVAC RENEWAL LEROUX EXCAVATING, INC. EXCAVATING/ FILLING RENEWAL LIBERTY COMFORT SYSTEMS HVAC NEW LINCO FAB, INC. GENERAL COMMERCIAL RENEWAL MASTER MOBILE HOME SERVICE HVAC RENEWAL MINNESOTA TREE SURGEONS, INC. TREE TRIMMING/ REMOVAL RENEWAL MISSION CONSTRUCTION GENERAL COMMERCIAL RENEWAL MOBILE MAINTENANCE, INC. HVAC RENEWAL MORE’S BURNER SERVICE HVAC RENEWAL NEWMECH COMPANIES, INC. HVAC RENEWAL NORTHERN HEATING & AIR COND. HVAC RENEWAL OPUS NORTHWEST CONST.LLC GENERAL COMMERCIAL RENEWAL RIVER CITY SHEET METAL HVAC RENEWAL RON’S MECHANICAL HVAC RENEWAL SOUTH-TOWN REFRIGERATION HVAC RENEWAL ST. CROIX TREE SERVICE TREE TRIMMING/REMOVAL RENEWAL ST.CLOUD REFRIGERATION HVAC RENEWAL STANDARD HEATING & AIR COND. HVAC RENEWAL TARRAF CONSTRUCTION GENERAL COMMERCIAL RENEWAL THE SNELLING COMPANY HVAC RENEWAL THERMEX CORPORATION HVAC RENEWAL TOP-ALL ROOFING, INC. GENERAL COMMERCIAL RENEWAL TOTAL COMFORT HVAC NEW WELLING WINDOW & DOOR CO. WINDOW INSTALLATION RENEWAL WENZEL HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING HVAC NEW YALE MECHANICAL HVAC RENEWAL Staff Recommendation: Approve license applications as requested. Item No. 08B Meeting Date: December 22, 2008 Type of Business: CA City Administrator Review _______ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Desaree Crane, Assistant Clerk-Administrator Item Title/Subject: Resolution 7385, Approving Therapeutic Massage License Renewals In accordance with Mounds View City Code, Section 514.13, all Therapeutic Massage Licenses expire on December 31st. 514.13: LICENSE TERM; RENEWALS: Licenses expire annually on December 31. The license fee will be prorated in thirty (30) day increments for licenses issued after June 30. The Clerk-Administrator must prepare an application form for the renewal of a license requiring information that the manager determines necessary for consideration of the renewal. The renewal application must be made no later than November 30. The City currently has three Therapeutic Massage Licenses up for renewal. All three have submitted application materials, fees and have current Certificate of Insurances. The following below are renewing their licenses: Name Location Dennis Opitz Anytime Fitness – 2541County Rd 10 Kathleen Olesen Renting Space at Silver View Chiropractic – 2552 County Rd 10 Xiuju Li Jian Kang Massage, located at 2552 County Road 10. Staff received background checks from the Minnesota Department of Criminal Apprehension, and all checks came back satisfactory. Recommendation: Approve Resolution 7385, Approving Therapeutic Massage License Renewals. . Respectfully submitted, Desaree Crane RESOLUTION NO. 7385 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OR RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE LICENSE REWNEWALS WHEREAS, the City Code requires that massage therapist must be licensed in the City; and WHEREAS, three applicants have submitted applications and fees for Therapeutic Massage License Renewals to continue to practice therapeutic massage in the City of Mounds View; and WHEREAS, all three applicants are compliant under Chapter 514 of the Mounds View City Code; and WHEREAS, all three applicants have submitted a Certificate of Liability Insurance in accordance with the City Code; and WHEREAS, all three applicants received satisfactory background checks with the Minnesota Department of Criminal Apprehension. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Therapeutic Massage License renewals are approved to the following below: Name Location Dennis Opitz Anytime Fitness – 2541County Rd 10 Kathleen Olesen Renting Space at Silver View Chiropractic – 2552 County Rd 10 Xiuju Li Jian Kang Massage, located at 2552 County Road 10. NOW, MAY IT FURTHER BE RESOLVED, these renewals listed in the resolution will be effective on January 1, 2009 and expire on December 31, 2009. Adopted this 22nd day of December, 2008. ___________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Jim Ericson, Clerk-Administrator (seal) Item No: 8C Meeting Date: Dec 22, 2008 Type of Business: Consent Administrator Review : ___ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: James Ericson, Clerk - Administrator Item Title/Subject: Resolution 7386 Approving the Assignment of the Creative Kids Lease Agreement Introduction: Tracy Sonterre, the owner and operator of the Creative Kids Childcare center operating out of the Community Center, has requested City consent to an assignment of her lease. She is considering a sale of the business and according to the lease, a sale of the business—even if no other changes would be proposed—would require City Council approval. Discussion: I have met with the two individuals who have agreed to purchase the business from Ms. Sonterre; they are professional and have extensive business experience. No material changes to the lease were requested or proposed—all terms would remain as they are presently and the existing staff would be asked to remain. The new owners are excited to take over the business and to assume the assigned lease agreement. To ensure proper assignment, I asked Kennedy & Graven to prepare an assignment document and resolution to effectuate the assignment. The resolution stipulates that the assignee (the new owners) shall be required to reimburse the City for its costs associated with the preparation of the assignment agreement and the resolution. Ms. Sonterre indicates that satisfaction of the purchase agreement conditions is a prerequisite for Council action. Thus, if we learn that the buyer has not fully satisfied all terms of the acquisition, staff will pull the item from the agenda. Recommendation: Approve Resolution 7386, a resolution approving the assignment of the Creative Kids lease agreement, subject to satisfaction of purchase agreement conditions and payment of city costs related to the preparation of the assignment documents. Respectfully submitted, ________________________ James Ericson Clerk - Administrator RESOLUTION 7386 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF AN ASSIGNMENT, ASSUMPTION AND CONSENT AGREEMENT TO LEASE WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View, as landlord (“Landlord”), and Creative Kids Child Care Center II, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, as tenant (“Tenant”) entered into a leased dated November 20, 2006 (“Lease”); and WHEREAS, Tenant intends to sell the Creative Kids Child Care Center II, Inc. company (“Company”) to Rajiv Garg, an Individual, and Sangeeta Jain, an Individual (collectively “Assignee”); and WHEREAS, in connection with the sale of the Company to Assignee, Tenant has requested that Landlord consent to the assignment of the Lease to Assignee by executing the document entitled Assignment, Assumption and Consent Agreement to Lease (“Agreement”) which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Recitals set forth above are incorporated into this Resolution as if fully set forth herein. 2. The Agreement is deemed acceptable and the Mayor and Clerk- Administrator are authorized to execute the Agreement and to take all necessary and reasonable steps to effectuate the Agreement. 3. All costs associated with the preparation of the Agreement shall be the responsibility of the Assignee. Adopted this 22nd day of December, 2008. ____________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor (ATTEST) ____________________________________ James Ericson, Clerk Administrator (SEAL) ASSIGNMENT, ASSUMPTION AND CONSENT AGREEMENT TO LEASE (“THE AGREEMENT”) DATE: December 22, 2008 PARTIES: City of Mounds View, MN ("Landlord") Creative Kids Child Care Center II, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“Tenant”) Rajiv Garg, an Individual and Sangeeta Jain, an Individual (collectively “Assignee") RECITALS: A. Landlord and Tenant are parties to that certain Lease dated November 20, 2006 (the "Lease") for that portion of the Mounds View Community Center located at 5392 Edgewood Drive, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 described more particularly on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Premises"). B. Tenant desires to assign all of its right, title and interest in and to the Lease to Assignee and Assignee desires to accept such assignment. C. Landlord is willing to consent to said assignment, subject to the conditions set forth herein. AGREEMENT: In consideration of the following terms and conditions, the parties agree as follows: 1. The forgoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein. 2. The effective date of this Agreement shall be December ___, 2008 (the "Effective Date"). 3. As of the Effective Date, Tenant does hereby sell, assign, and transfer to Assignee all of Tenant's right, liabilities, title and interest in and to the Lease pursuant to the terms of the Lease. 4. As of the Effective Date, Assignee does hereby accept such assignment and does further hereby assume and agree to perform and be bound by all of the terms, liabilities, conditions and obligations of the tenant under the Lease. Without limiting the foregoing, Assignee hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Tenant from all claims and liabilities arising under the Lease from and after the Effective Date. 5 Landlord hereby consents to the, foregoing assignment and assumption of the Lease, subject to all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. 6. Notwithstanding any provisions of the Lease or of this Agreement to the contrary, Landlord's consent to the foregoing assignment and assumption of the Lease shall not constitute a waiver of the necessity of a further consent by Landlord to any assignment of the Leave or subletting of the Premises subsequent to the date hereof. 7. Tenant hereby acknowledges that, Tenant shall remain fully liable for the performance of all of the terms, conditions and obligations to be performed by tenant pursuant to the Lease, including but not limited to the payment of rent and other sums and charges due thereunder. Landlord, Tenant and Assignee hereby acknowledge and agree that, as of the Effective Date, Tenant is fully, finally and completely released and discharged from the performance of any and all of the terms, conditions and obligations under, and from any and all claims and liability arising out of, the Lease, including but not limited to the payment of rent and other sums and charges due thereunder. EXHIBIT A. 8. Tenant hereby warrant and represents, for the benefit of Landlord, that the following statements are true and correct, A. The Lease represents the entire agreement between Tenant and Landlord as to the subject matter thereof. B. No default by Landlord exists in the performance or observation of any covenant or condition in the Lease and there are no defenses or offsets against the enforcement of the lease by Landlord. 9. Landlord hereby certifies to Assignee that: A. The Lease represents the entire agreement between Tenant and Landlord as to the subject matter thereof and the Lease has not been amended except as contained in this Agreement. B. To the best of Landlord’s knowledge, no default by Landlord or Tenant exists in the performance or observation of any covenant or condition in the Lease and all rent for December, 2008 has been paid in full. C. The current base rent under the Lease is $6,072.15 per month. As of January 1, 2009, the base rent shall be $6,287.43 per month. D. The Lease currently expires on July 31, 2011. 11. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. 12. Notwithstanding any contrary provision contained in this Agreement, this Agreement shall not be effective and shall be null and void if Tenant and Assignee fail to close on Assignee’s purchase of Tenant’s business at the Premises. City of Mounds View, MN (Landlord) Creative Kids Child Care Center II, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (Tenant) By: By:_____________________________________ Its: Mayor Its:______________________________________ Dated: Dated:___________________________________ By:________________________________________ Its: Clerk-Administrator Dated:_____________________________________ Rajiv Garg, an Individual (Assignee) Sanjeeta Jain, an Individual (Assignee) ________________________________________ Dated: Dated: __________________________________ Item No.8E Meeting Date:December 22, 2008 Type of Business: CA WK: Work Session; PH: Public Hearing; CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business City Administrator Review _______ City of Mounds View Staff Report To:Honorable Mayor and City Council From:Joe Rhein, Consulting Engineer Item Title/Subject:Resolution 7390 Accepting the Pinewood Storm Sewer Repair Project and Authorizing Final Payment Background: On June 23, 2008 the City Council adopted Resolution 7298 awarding a construction contract for the Pinewood Storm Sewer Repair Project to Penn Contracting Incorporated of Minneapolis, Minnesota in the amount of $27,104.00. Discussion: Penn Contracting Incorporated has requested that acceptance and final payment be made by the City for the Pinewood Storm Sewer Repair Project. All work has been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the contract plans and specifications. The necessary contract documents have been provided. A copy of Request for Payment No. 2 & Final is included with this Staff Report, along with a project summary letter that provides a recap of the construction schedule and cost. The original contract amount was $27,104.00. There were no change orders to the project. The actual final construction cost is $28,854.00, and the final payment amount is $2,045.95. As noted in the project summary letter, the difference in the original contract amount and the actual final construction cost is due primarily to a greater amount of poor soil being encountered beneath the storm sewer pipe than anticipated. Although the final construction amount exceeded the original contract amount, the final construction amount is still less than the amount of the second lowest bid received on the project. The project cost is also within the approved budget. Recommendation: Resolution 7390, accepting the project and authorizing final payment to the contractor, has been prepared and is included with this Staff Report. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution and make final payment for the Pinewood Storm Sewer Repair Project to Penn Contracting, Incorporated in the amount of $2,045.95. Respectfully submitted, Joseph R. Rhein, Consulting Engineer Attachments: Resolution 7390 Project Summary Letter – Dec. 18, 2008 Request for Payment No. 2 & Final RESOLUTION 7390 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA ACCEPTING THE PINEWOOD STORM SEWER REPAIR PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT WHEREAS, Penn Contracting, Incorporated has requested that acceptance and final payment be made by the City for the Pinewood Storm Sewer Repair Project; and WHEREAS, all work has been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the contract plans and specifications; and WHEREAS,the original contract amount was $27,104.00, the actual final construction cost is $28,854.00 and the final payment amount is $2,045.95. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Pinewood Storm Sewer Repair Project is hereby accepted. 2. Final payment to Penn Contracting, Incorporated in the amount of $2,045.95 is hereby authorized. Adopted this 22nd day of December 2008. ____________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor (ATTEST) ____________________________________ James Ericson, Clerk–Administrator (SEAL) Corrections made by Mayor Marty, Council Member Joe Flaherty, Clerk -Administator Ericson and Community Development Director Ken Roberts PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL 1 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2 RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 3 4 Regular Meeting 5 November 24, 2008 6 Mounds View City Hall 7 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 8 7:03P.M. 9 10 11 1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER 12 13 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 14 15 3. ROLL CALL: Marty, Stigney, Hull, Flaherty, and Mueller 16 17 NOT PRESENT: None. 18 19 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 20 21 A. Monday, November 24, 2008, City Council Agenda 22 23 Mayor Marty noted that citizens had asked that Item 6C be moved to 9:00 p.m. Council agreed. 24 25 MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Approve the Monday, November 24, 2008 Agenda as 26 Amended. 27 28 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 29 30 5. PUBLIC INPUT 31 32 None. 33 34 6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS 35 36 A. Presentation by the Mounds View School District (Dan Hoverman, 37 Superintendent, and Marre Jo Sager) 38 39 Superintendent Hoverman and Board Member Marre Jo Sager appeared before the Council to 40 share an update on School Board business. 41 42 Mayor Marty noted he had attended the last school board meeting to discuss the possibility of 43 adding world languages to the curriculum but his concerns were what would be given up to allow 44 for the world languages. The School Board is looking at how to incorporate world languages 45 Mounds View City Council November 24, 2008 Regular Meeting Page 2 without giving up core academics. Social studies and science may have to be modified to allow 1 for it. 2 3 Superintendent Hoverman said that they are still examining how to do this, and social studies and 4 science would still be a commitment, but they would like to address the standards and allow for 5 the world languages classes. 6 7 B. Presentation by the YMCA, Review of Programs and Participation (Pat 8 Riemersma, Pat Prindle) 9 10 Pat Prindle, Program Director at the Community Center, handed out programming sheets for 11 Council to review. 12 13 Council Member Mueller asked for information on cancellations if there are not enough 14 registrations. Pat Prindle explained how they handle programming. 15 16 Council Member Mueller asked how the budget is going for 2008. 17 18 Ms. Riemersma said that they are pretty close this year. 19 20 Mayor Marty said that he feels the surplus should be greater than stated, because there used to be 21 two program directors and now there is one. And, the one program director position was vacant 22 for a period of time, and when filled, it was hired at a position of lesser cost. He said that he was 23 thinking there should be considerable savings. 24 25 Mayor Marty indicated that he had heard that the 55 driving class was cancelled and those who 26 showed up were not happy, and the registered parties were not notified and showed up for a class 27 that did not happen, he want to be sure the notification process works like it should 28 29 Mayor Marty said that the number of calls he has received have been negative from the 30 community, and to have only positive evaluations provided for each activity seems “hand 31 picked”. 32 33 Mayor Marty noted that Steve Dazenski has not been very happy about the reports that he has 34 gotten, as he feels that there is not enough supervision going on in the building. Within the last 35 week or two there were handicapped bars that were broken, and it cost $500 and half a day to fix 36 them. In talking with the YMCA staff they knew nothing about it at all. Steve also stated that 37 John Hughes tries to do a good job of cleaning and maintenance, and he gets it all in order, and 38 then there is a program with a number of youth and the next morning there is pop cans, trash and 39 candy wrappers and it is a big mess. 40 41 Mayor Marty indicated that the YMCA staff has been sitting at the desk, and there needs to be 42 more supervision and more hands on to eliminate this type of thing. 43 44 Mounds View City Council November 24, 2008 Regular Meeting Page 3 Clerk Administrator Ericson confirmed that Mr. Dazenski expressed some frustrations with the 1 situation that seemingly little effort is made for minimal maintenance after a program. 2 3 Mayor Marty said that he would like some of these issues addressed in light of the fact that the 4 contract is up at the end of the year. He then suggested a six-month extension to allow the 5 Council and the YMCA to address this during the first six months of the new year. 6 7 Council Member Flahertyl said that he would like some better specifics in order to address the 8 concerns. He then said that the summer programs have 3 of 4 registrations that are residents of 9 Mounds View. Staffing is much more efficient. He also is happy to see the swimming programs 10 at Edgewood and he is glad to start up the mini mites soccer. 11 12 C. Resolution 7366 in Opposition to Proposed Runway Extension at the Anoka 13 County-Blaine Airport and Opposition to Legislative Efforts to Reclassify the 14 Airport as an Intermediate Status 15 16 This item was heard out of order later in the meeting. 17 18 Clerk Administrator Ericson reported that the Anoka County Commission’s Airport Committee 19 was entertaining a Resolution that would support extending the East-West runway to 6,000 feet 20 that would then be recommended to the full County Board. There were a number of government 21 officials and residents at the meeting and, in light of the concern, the meeting was recessed to 22 another date for a public hearing. That meeting has been cancelled but the issue is not going 23 away. 24 25 Barb Haake of 3024 County Road I addressed the Council and said that the main thing is that the 26 City needs to be vigilant on this. She was notified by a county commissioner of what was 27 happening otherwise the City would not have known about this. She further said that she thinks 28 that they are going to the legislature to expand to the runway 6,000 feet. 29 30 Ms. Haake said that whenever something is presented to the public the decision seem to already 31 have been made, so why have a public hearing. December 1 at 11:00 a.m. the airport advisory 32 commission will meet to discuss this at the Anoka County airport tower. 33 34 Ms. Haake said that the City will need to ask for sound proofing around the area and that would 35 be expensive to do. The agreement with M.A.C. limiting the length at the north-south runway 36 goes to 2020 so the City needs to be vigilant to keep track of them. 37 38 Mayor Marty indicated that there were a lot of people from Blaine at the meeting and the room 39 was very full. 40 41 Ms. Haake said that they are using safety to push this through, but she has discussed this with 42 pilots and 5,000 feet is adequate. 43 44 Mounds View City Council November 24, 2008 Regular Meeting Page 4 MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Approve Resolution 7366 in Opposition to Proposed 1 Runway Extension at the Anoka County-Blaine Airport and Opposition to Legislative Efforts to 2 Reclassify the Airport as an Intermediate Status. 3 4 5 Clerk Administrator Ericson read Resolution 7366. 6 7 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 8 9 Council Member Stigney asked that the Resolution be sent to surrounding communities in Anoka 10 County. Administrator Ericson indicated he would do so. 11 12 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS 13 A. 7:05 p.m. Public Hearing, Resolution 7369, a Resolution to Approve the 2009 14 Mounds View Fee Schedule. 15 16 Clerk Administrator Ericson noted that staff is researching permit and fee information through 17 Metro Cities so staff is recommending opening the public hearing and move to continue the 18 hearing to the December 8, 2008 meeting to allow staff time to review the permits and licenses to 19 ensure that the City’s fees are where they need to be. 20 21 Mayor Marty opened the public hearing. 22 23 MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Mueller. To Continue the Public Hearing to December 8, 2008. 24 25 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 26 27 B. Resolution 7359, Approving Location of Sidewalk Along Red Oak Drive South 28 of Hillview Road in the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project. 29 30 Joe Rhein, consulting engineer with Bonestroo, provided an overview of the Red Oak Drive 31 sidewalk reconstruction. 32 33 Mayor Marty noted that staff is in discussion with the property owner for the next easements 34 needed for the trail and sidewalk along County Highway 10. 35 36 Council Member Mueller asked the cost of the additional sidewalk to the project. Mr. Rhein 37 indicated that it is approximately $13,000 for this segment of sidewalk. 38 39 Council Member Stigney asked the price difference between asphalt and concrete. Mr. Rhein 40 indicated that typically the wider trails are usually asphalt and the others have been concrete. 41 This is a very narrow sidewalk so there is not much of a cost difference with the bituminous and 42 the concrete. 43 44 Mounds View City Council November 24, 2008 Regular Meeting Page 5 MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 7359, 1 Approving Location of Sidewalk Along Red Oak Drive South of Hillview Road in the 2009-2 2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project. 3 4 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 5 6 C. Resolution 7367, 2009 Budget Adjustments for Code Enforcement Program 7 8 Community Development Director Roberts reviewed the requested budget amendments for the 9 Code Enforcement Program by adding computer technology in order to save on staff time, make 10 the process more efficient and ultimately save the department money. 11 12 Council Member Flaherty asked if it is the same mounting equipment in police cars and whether 13 the Police Department had any extras. Community Development Director Roberts indicated that 14 the police department does not have any extras. 15 16 MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Flaherty. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 7367, 17 2009 Budget Adjustments for Code Enforcement Program. 18 19 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 20 21 D. Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance 816, an Ordinance Amending 22 Chapter 1008 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Sign Code. 23 24 Community Development Director Roberts reviewed Ordinance 816, an update to the sign code 25 to allow for dynamic signs and to bring the Code up to required standards. 26 27 Council Member Flaherty commented that the timing of the 15 seconds concerns him because he 28 feels that 15 seconds, if you are at a stop light and cannot get the whole message on one board he 29 is afraid that people will be looking back to see the other half of a message. 30 31 Council expressed concern with potentially offensive signs. 32 33 Attorney Riggs said that he feels that the Ordinance is in good shape to handle issues that may 34 arise. 35 36 Dan Hall, owner of The Mermaid, 2200 County Highway 10, said that he has not had a chance to 37 read this but he does have a question or two. He asked if his sign would meet code requirements. 38 He then asked if there is anyone who is offended by his sign right now. 39 40 Mayor M arty said that he does not think that anyone takes offense at the sign at the Mermaid. He 41 then said that personally he does not think that the sign is a hazard. 42 43 Dan Hall said he thinks his sign is beautiful and adds to the City of Mounds View. He then said 44 that it seems to him that the restrictions being placed are “overboard”. 45 Mounds View City Council November 24, 2008 Regular Meeting Page 6 1 Sherry Gunn, 5459 Landmark Circle, said that the more she looks at the signs in the City, the 2 seven seconds seems to be a good time. It allows her to read more messages. 3 4 Mayor Marty said that advertising by an owner on premise, should be differentiated between 5 those and the billboards. 6 7 Council Member Stigney said that he wants to see the whole message in a minimum number of 8 seconds not segments of it. He then said he would want to have soft graphics defined. 9 10 Council Member Stigney said that he wants two billboard structures to come down before one 11 dynamic sign would be allowed. 12 13 Mayor Marty reviewed with Staff his corrections/amendments to the proposed Ordinance. And 14 also suggested a one for one removal in order to get the billboard by Walgreen’s removed, as it is 15 there forever, while the others in the city have a sunset clause and will eventually come down 16 regardless. 17 18 Staff was asked to rework the language for on premises signs. 19 20 Council Member Mueller stated on Page 25 she would like to require that images shall not 21 include any video or high impact images or content. 22 23 Council suggested 10 seconds as the time interval for the next draft of the document. 24 25 Council Member Stigney asked for clarification on the sign interval timing. Staff explained. 26 27 MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Mueller. To Waive the Reading and Introduce Ordinance 816, an 28 Ordinance Amending Chapter 1008 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Sign Code as 29 Amended. 30 31 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 32 33 Council went back to Item 6C at this point in the meeting. 34 35 Council then heard Item G. 36 37 E. Resolution 7368, Approving a Longevity Increase for Officer Jeremy 38 Hellpap. 39 40 MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Extend the Meeting to 11:00 p.m. 41 42 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 43 44 Mounds View City Council November 24, 2008 Regular Meeting Page 7 MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Mueller. To Approve Resolution 7368, Approving a Longevity 1 Increase for Officer Jeremy Hellpap. 2 3 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 4 5 F. Resolution 7356, Authorization to advertise and Recommend a Candidate for 6 Hire for the Public Service Officer Position opening in the Police Department. 7 8 Chief Sommer noted that the Resolution asks for a full time person rather than the ¾ time to 9 allow for more time for code enforcement to be conducted in the City, which addresses one of the 10 Council’s priorities. 11 12 Mayor Marty said that he has reservations about making this position full time. 13 14 Council Member Hull agreed. 15 16 Council Member-elect Gunn said that she feels that the need code enforcement is only going to 17 increase over time in the City and it is an issue very important to residents. 18 19 MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Flaherty. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 7356, 20 Authorization to Advertise and Recommend a Candidate for Hire for the Public Service Officer 21 Position Opening in the Police Department. 22 23 Council Member Hull asked what stops the next person from moving on to another police officer 24 position. 25 26 Chief Sommer responded that the desired candidate may not want to be a police officer but the 27 reality is that there would be nothing to prevent the PSO from moving on to a police officer 28 position. 29 30 Council Member Stigney said that development business has slowed down so the building 31 official should have time to assist with code enforcement. He then said that he does not think 32 that it is time to add a full time person in this position. 33 34 Mayor Marty said that he does not feel it is the appropriate time to add this position as full time. 35 36 Council Member Flaherty said that code enforcement was the number one issue, just behind the 37 street projects during his campaign. This is something that residents can see and realize 38 something tangible for their tax dollars. 39 40 Mayor Marty said that he would like to consider cross training individuals from economic 41 development for code enforcement since the development is way down in the City. 42 43 Ayes – 2 Nays – 3(Hull/Marty/Stigney) Motion failed. 44 45 Mounds View City Council November 24, 2008 Regular Meeting Page 8 MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Hull. To Reconsider Resolution 7356 and Adopt the Resolution as 1 Amended to Allow the Chief to advertise for a ¾ time PSO position. 2 3 Ayes – 4 Nays – 1(Stigney) Motion carried. 4 5 Council Member Stigney suggested that the motion to reconsider should be separate from any 6 motion of approval. 7 8 City Attorney Riggs indicated that the motion to reconsider and adopt simultaneously is 9 appropriate. 10 11 MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Marty. To Extend the Meeting to 11:30 p.m. 12 13 Ayes – 4 Nays – 1(Stigney) Motion carried. 14 15 G. Resolution 7360, Amending Resolution 7307 in Regard to Parking Along 16 Hillview Road and Greenwood Drive as Reconstructed Under the 2009-2010 17 Street and Utility Improvement Project. 18 19 Joe Rhein, Bonestroo, provided information on parking along Hillview Road and Greenwood 20 Drive as part of the 2009 – 2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project. 21 22 Mr.Rhein noted that angled parking is to be constructed along Hillview Road. 23 24 John Kroeger said that last week the Streets and Utilities Committee had restated its position and 25 they remain with their initial position. They also discussed this with the Forester and asked for a 26 walk through to discuss impacts to trees. 27 28 Cindy Palm spoke to the cost of the project noting that there are 15 parallel stalls, removing 9 29 stalls to add 14 angled stalls that makes 20 stalls with one additional stall for handicapped 30 parking. She then said that at $30,000 that is $10,000 per stall to add two more stalls to the north 31 side of Hillview and that does not make any sense. The City could open up Hillview to allow 32 parking on both sides. 33 34 Council Member Mueller said that she is concerned that the park is stagnant and she is 35 wondering if it was a waste of money to upgrade the building. She then said she has received 36 calls about this issue. 37 38 Council Member Mueller indicated that park usage is projected to increase and she is in favor of 39 the short option. 40 41 Council Member Hull asked whether it is true that the building is not being rented due to parking 42 issues. Clerk Administrator Ericson said that it may be true of some users but he is not sure that 43 it is measurable. 44 45 Mounds View City Council November 24, 2008 Regular Meeting Page 9 Council Member Hull said that he is beginning to have second thoughts about this project as the 1 parking would only increase by a few spaces. He then said that he would like to open up parking 2 on the south side of Hillview. He further said that he feels that five extra spots are cost 3 prohibitive. 4 5 MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Mueller. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 7360, a 6 Resolution Amending Resolution 7307 in Regard to Parking Along Hillview Road and 7 Greenwood Drive as Reconstructed Under the 2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement 8 Project. 9 10 Council Member Mueller said that it was the opinion of the former public works director that 11 they were having some maintenance issues because of where vehicles were driving in the winter. 12 13 Cindy Palm said that she does not see the need for the sidewalk as it seems to be a majority of the 14 cost. Joe Rhein explained that the sidewalk is approximately half the cost of this improvement. 15 The reason for the need of the sidewalk is because Hillview is designated as a pedestrian corridor 16 on the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 17 18 Council Member Stigney said that he favors making this an amenity for parking and curbing but 19 with the question of the sidewalk of concrete, he does not feel that is necessary. 20 21 MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Marty. To Amend the Motion to Remove the Sidewalk from the 22 Project. 23 24 Mr. Rhein said that the City could add a sidewalk in the future if it is determined to be needed. 25 26 Council Member Flaherty stated that 27 28 Ayes – 4 Nays – 1(Hull) Amendment carried. 29 30 Ayes – 4 Nays – 1(Hull) Motion, as amended carried. 31 32 H. Resolution 7361, Authorizing Analysis of the Ardan Avenue Drainage 33 Subdistrict. 34 35 Joe Rhein, consultant engineer with Bonestroo, noted that in putting together the specifications 36 for the street project staff did some research on Red Oak Drive and there was a drainage report 37 done in 1989 that identified a drainage trunk sewer along Ardan. Staff reviewed the study and 38 found that the analysis was correct but it appears that the analysis may take things to a standard 39 beyond what is necessary. 40 41 Council Member Mueller noted that she and Greg Lee discussed this in 2006 during another 42 street project. At that time, he thought that the rain garden proposal for Sherwood would take 43 care of the infiltration and he felt that the Ardan Avenue issue would be addressed when the 44 street project was done. 45 Mounds View City Council November 24, 2008 Regular Meeting Page 10 1 Mayor Marty said that he feels an alternative plan is necessary but he is concerned with the 2 schedule because there is usually not a second meeting in December. 3 4 MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 7361, 5 Authorizing Analysis of the Ardan Avenue Drainage Subdistrict. 6 7 Council Member Mueller said that she would like to set a not to exceed cost. 8 9 MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Marty. To Amend the Motion to Add Item 4 with Capped at 10 $9,000. 11 12 Ayes – 4 Nays -1(Flaherty) Amendment carried. 13 14 Council Member Flaherty said that he feels the City is going to okay $9,000 to see if there might 15 be a problem, which seems odd to him. He is not aware of any flooding issues in the area or 16 complaints from residents to justify the work.. 17 18 Mayor Marty noted that there was a recommendation from 1989 and if the City ignores it and 19 someone’s home floods then the City is going to be liable. 20 21 Council Member Mueller asked if any of the statistics from Sherwood Road drainage swales 22 would be of assistance. 23 24 Mr. Rhein indicated that they need to go out and shoot low areas going up common rear lot lines 25 and basement window sills, areas a little farther off the street. 26 27 Ayes – 4 Nays – 1(Flaherty) Motion carried. 28 29 I. Resolution 7363, Approving the Agency Delegated Contract Process 30 Agreement Between the City of Mounds View and the Minnesota 31 Department of Transportation. 32 33 Joe Rhein, consultant engineer with Bonestroo, indicated that this agreement is required to accept 34 federal funding through Mn/DOT. 35 36 Mayor Marty noted under “letting” the City may not add other work to the project without 37 obtaining approval of Mn/DOT. He then asked what happens with change orders and how is that 38 handled? 39 40 Joe Rhein said that there is more paperwork involved to ensure that funding is not jeopardized. 41 42 Attorney Riggs said that this Agreement needs work and he would want the Resolution amended 43 to allow negotiation of the Agreement with Mn/DOT. The proposed Agreement is too one sided. 44 45 Mounds View City Council November 24, 2008 Regular Meeting Page 11 MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Flaherty. To extend the Meeting 30 Minutes. 1 2 Ayes – 4 Nays – 1(Stigney) Motion carried. 3 4 Council agreed to table this matter to allow time for the Agreement to be amended. 5 6 MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Mueller. To Postpone Resolution 7363 to Allow Amendment of 7 the Agreement. 8 9 Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 10 11 Council Member Stigney was not present for the vote. 12 13 J. Resolution 7362, Approving the Plans and Specifications, and Authorizing 14 the Advertisement for Bids for the County Road 10 Trailway project: 15 Segments 1-5. 16 17 Joe Rhein, consultant engineer with Bonestroo, noted that this matter is important to accomplish 18 this evening to maintain the project schedule and summarized the project for Council. 19 20 MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Mueller. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 7362, 21 Approving the Plans and Specifications, and Authorizing the Advertisement for Bids for the 22 County Road 10 Trailway Project Segments 1-5 as Amended. 23 24 Council Member Mueller stated that this is the trail project on the north side of County Highway 25 10 from Red Oak Drive to where Western Bank is located and she does not want the same 26 contractor that did the trail on the south side. 27 28 Joe Rhein indicated that the contractor from that project is no longer in business. 29 30 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 31 32 8. CONSENT AGENDA 33 34 A. Licenses for Approval (none to approve) 35 B. Resolution 7365 Approving Additional Scope of Work with Springsted 36 Associates. 37 C. Schedule an Executive Session of the City Council Immediately Following 38 Tonight’s Meeting to Discuss Union Contract Negotiations. 39 D. Resolution 7364 Approval of the TimeSaver Recording Secretary Contract 40 Addendum for 2009. 41 E. Resolution 7355, Approving 2009 SCORE Recycling Grant request to 42 Ramsey County. 43 F. Resolution 7357, Authorizing a Garbage Contract for City Buildings. 44 Mounds View City Council November 24, 2008 Regular Meeting Page 12 G. Resolution 7358, Electing to Retain the Statutory Tort Limit on Liability for 1 the 2009 Insurance Policies. 2 3 Council Member Stigney requested that Items B and C be removed for discussion. 4 5 MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Approve Consent Agenda Items D, E, F and G as 6 Presented. 7 8 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 9 10 B. Resolution 7365 Approving Additional Scope of Work with Springsted 11 Associates 12 13 Council Member Stigney pointed out the additional costs for a Hay Study. 14 15 Mayor Marty noted that the amount that they originally bid on this study has been spent and they 16 are up against the wall and need to complete the project. 17 18 MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Mueller. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 7365, a 19 Resolution Approving Additional Scope of Work with Springsted Associates. 20 21 Mayor Marty asked if the job descriptions have been reviewed and provided to Springsted. 22 23 Clerk Administrator Ericson noted there are a couple of descriptions that need significant work 24 and those will be provided. 25 26 Ayes – 4 Nays – 1(Stigney) Motion carried. 27 28 C. Schedule an Executive Session 29 30 Council Member Stigney said that it is 11:55 p.m. and he is wondering how important this closed 31 session is. 32 33 Clerk Administrator indicated that staff needs to discuss this if Council wants a signed contract 34 in 2008 rather than 2009. He then said that it would be about a five minute discussion. 35 36 MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Mueller. To Approve Setting an Executive Session Immediately 37 Following this Council Meeting. 38 39 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 40 41 9. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS 42 43 MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Hull. To Approve Just and Correct Claims as presented. 44 45 Mounds View City Council November 24, 2008 Regular Meeting Page 13 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 1 2 10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3 4 None. 5 6 11. REPORTS 7 8 A. Reports of Mayor and Council 9 10 Mayor Marty noted he attended the Anoka County Airport runway extension meeting. 11 12 Council Member Mueller attended the League of Minnesota Cities seminar on November 18, 13 2008 on league insurance and other interesting topics including legislative updates. 14 15 Council Member Mueller reported that Santa will be coming to neighborhoods December 1 16 through 4 and will be collecting non-perishable food items for the food shelf. 17 18 Council Member Stigney said that Council discussed hiring a full time PSO that was rejected and 19 a motion to reconsider the resolution was brought and he was not provided any opportunity to 20 vote and was not allowed to debate it or discuss it. He said that this was a violation of Roberts 21 Rules of Order. 22 23 B. Reports of Staff 24 25 Community Development Director Roberts provided an update on the branding study to date. 26 Clerk Administrator Ericson noted that the Community Center Staff has brought up that the 27 owners of the pool tables, air hockey and fooseball table would like to remove the machines as 28 they are not bringing in the revenue that they thought that they would see. Prices were provided 29 if the City wanted to purchase them. Revenue is listed in the report. Mr. Prindle has 30 recommended a foosball table and pool table be kept but that is up to Council. 31 32 Council Member Mueller asked about traffic counts on Red Oak south of Long Lake. Staff will 33 set out the counters to get an accurate idea in the coming weeks. 34 35 Council asked staff to contact residents on Hillview Road regarding the potential of removing the 36 no parking signs by the park. 37 38 MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Flaherty. To Recess at 12:15 a.m. to Executive Session. 39 40 Ayes – 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 41 42 C. Reports of City Attorney 43 44 None. 45 Mounds View City Council November 24, 2008 Regular Meeting Page 14 1 12. Next Council Work Session: Monday, December 1, 2008, at 7:00 p.m. 2 Next Special Council Meeting: Monday, December 1, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. (Truth-3 in-Taxation) 4 Next Council Meeting: Monday, December 8, 2008, at 7:00 p.m. 5 6 13. ADJOURNMENT 7 8 The meeting was adjourned from the executive session, at xxxx p.m. 9 10 Transcribed by: 11 12 13 Joan Lenzmeier 14 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 15 Item No: 11B1 Meeting Date: December 22, 2008 Type of Business: Administrator Review: _____ City of Mounds View Staff Report To:Honorable Mayor and City Council From:Joe Rhein, Consulting Engineer Item Title/Subject:Report on Arden Hill’s Proposed I-35W & County Road H Interchange Improvements Background: Significant planning activities are being focused on the TCAAP area of Arden Hills, including the abutting roadways. There are three primary areas of focus: - Ramsey County is studying the potential to create a grade separated intersection at Highway 10 and County Road 96 - Private developer is investigating the TCAAP site, and the potential for a new primary road entrance to the site which would connect to Highway 10 between County Road 96 and Interstate 35W - The City of Arden Hills is investigating the interchange of Interstate 35W and County Road H The potential improvements being investigated by Arden Hills at the interchange at I-35W and County Road H could extend down County Road H all the way to County Road 10. Therefore, there is the potential that the Arden Hills improvements could abut or even overlap the proposed future improvements by the City of Mounds View at the intersection of County Road 10 and County Road H. A Project Management Team (PMT) had been formed to meet regularly on the projects to share information and maintain good communication. Former Public Works Director Greg Lee had attended the PMT meetings on behalf of Mounds View. Due to lack of progress, the PMT meetings had been suspended in April 2008. Recently, the City received notice that the next PMT meeting had been scheduled for December 4, 2008. A representative from Bonestroo attended the meeting on behalf of Mounds View. Discussion: Materials from the PMT meeting are included with this Staff Report for the information of the City Council: - Meeting agenda - “Official” Meeting minutes prepared by the meeting organizer (SEH) - Meeting notes prepared by Bonestroo on behalf of Mounds View December 22, 2008 Item No. 11B 1 Page 2 The most noteworthy items to come from the meeting include the following: - Preliminary design of the improvements is scheduled to be complete by the end of 2009 - Construction is anticipated to begin in 2011 and extend into 2012 - Discussion of potential changes to the interchange / access to I-35W at County Road I due to safety concerns As noted in the Bonestroo meeting notes, the representatives from the City of Shoreview indicated that any reduction in access to I-35W at County Road I would be unacceptable. The Mounds View City Council may also wish to provide an initial “unofficial” reaction to the issue of potential access reduction or closure at County Road I, which Staff could express at the next PMT meeting. The next PMT meeting was not specifically scheduled, although the intent is to meet in January 2009. Respectfully submitted, Joseph R. Rhein, Consulting Engineer Attachments: - PMT Meeting #8 Agenda - PMT Meeting #8 Minutes - SEH - PMT Meeting #8 Notes - Bonestroo AGENDA I-35W/CR H Interchange PMT #8 December 4, 2008 9:00 am City of Arden Hills Copies to:PMT Members I.Traffic Forecasting Updates A.Meeting with Metro on November 25 1.Regional network assumptions have changed 2.TCAAP densities have been reduced 3.Discuss pros/cons of new forecast a.Metro suggested a sensitivity test of our forecast II.Traffic Modelling Update A.Meeting with Metro on November 5 1.Still trying to determine modeling scenarios III.Preliminary Design Update A.Present latest layout B.Status of CR I discussions IV.Next Steps/Process for Approvals A.Meeting with FHWA V.Proposed Schedule A.Complete preliminary design – Fall 2009 B.Complete Final Design – Fall 2010 C.Construction – Spring 2011 thru Summer 2012 VI.Funding Opportunities A.State – Local interchange funding B.Mn/DOT Coop Agreement – FY 2011 C.Bridge? D.Federal earmark VII.Next Meeting 1.TBD mdb s:\pt\r\ryaco\070300\meetings\pmt\cr h pmt #8 12-04-08.doc MINUTES I-35W/CR H Interchange PMT #8 December 4, 2008 9:00 am City of Arden Hills Copies to:PMT Members Meeting Attendees: Mark Maloney, Jim Tolaas, Marc Goess, Jim Aswegan, Matt Shands, Chris Chromy, Ron Moorse, Mark Benson I.Traffic Forecasting Updates A.Meeting with Mn/DOT Metro on November 25 1.Regional network assumptions have changed a.Completion of I-694 and TH 610 are no longer in Mn/DOTs TSP plan. The Met Council network still includes them. Mn/DOT requested that SEH perform a sensitivity test on its forecast to determine the affect of removing these improvements from the regional model. A summary sheet showing the forecast changes was distributed. The forecast along I-35W did not change significantly. However the forecast along TH 10 and I-694 dropped while the forecast along Highway 96 increased. 2.TCAAP Master Plan densities have been reduced resulting in a projected reduction of 15% vehicle trips. 3.Discuss pros/cons of new forecast a.Mn/DOT forecasting staff is currently reviewing the above results and will report back to SEH with a recommendation. b.Mark Maloney raised concerns that the communities have not been told that I-694 is no longer in Mn/DOT’s plan. c.Mark Maloney raised local concerns regarding changes to the CR I interchange. Rice Creek Parkway was built by the city to function as a city street. Any changes to CR I access would increase the role and function of Rice Creek Parkway which the City of Shoreview does not support. II.Traffic Modelling Update A.Meeting with Metro on November 5 1.Still determining modeling scenarios 2.Waiting for direction on the forecast and CR I III.Preliminary Design Update A.Layout has not changed over the last few months B.Waiting for CR I resolution C.Marc Goess mentioned that Mn/DOT has the CR 10 bridges over I-35W in its program for 2018. IV.Next Steps/Process for Approvals A.Schedule meeting with FHWA once Mn/DOT, Ramsey County and the communities agree to the resolution of the CR I access. V.Proposed Schedule A.Complete preliminary design – Fall 2009 B.Complete Final Design – Fall 2010 C.Construction – Spring 2011 thru Summer 2012 I-35W/CR H Interchange September 4, 2008 Page 2 VI.Funding Opportunities A.State – Local interchange funding B.Mn/DOT Coop Agreement – FY 2011 C.Bridge D.Federal earmark VII.Next Meeting 1.To be scheduled in January If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please contact Mark Benson at 651-490-2194, within 7 days. mdb s:\pt\r\ryaco\070300\meetings\pmt\cr h pmt #8 minutes 12-04-08.doc Memorandum To: Joe Rhein Project: 000435-08000-2 Date: 12/4/2008 From: Matt Shands Client: City of Mounds View Re: I-35W / CR H Interchange PMT meeting notes File No: 435-04114-0 I was asked to attend the meeting of the I35W / CR H Interchange project management team on the behalf of the City of Mounds View. The meeting took place at the City of Arden Hills City Hall, at 9:00AM on Thursday December 4, 2008. Those present were: Jim Tolaas, Ramsey County Ron Moorse, Arden Hills City Administrator Mark Benson, SEH Marc Goess, Mn/DOT Mark Maloney, City of Shoreview Jim Aswegan, Mn/DOT Matt Shands, Bonestroo (representing Mounds View) The meeting was led by Mark Benson of SEH. He indicated in his introduction that the main purpose of the meeting is to provide an update of the project. The meeting Agenda is attached at the end of these notes. The first two agenda items involved traffic forecasting and modeling. Mark reported that based on discussions at a November 25 meeting with Mn/DOT Metro Division, they learned that assumptions concerning the regional network that had been in place for the previous traffic forecast were no longer true. Specifically, two projects – the completion of the 694/35W interchange and completion of Highway 610 – are no longer identified in the Mn/DOT Transportation System Plan. Mark distributed an updated traffic analysis that compares traffic flows along I35W, TH 10, I-694, and CR 96 under the old assumptions and the new assumptions. Copy of analysis is included with these notes.Bottom line: some significant traffic count changes will occur at various locations throughout the region, but at the I-35W and CR H, the traffic count changes do not appear to be significant enough to warrant any changes in the preliminary design. The third agenda item involved discussion of the preliminary layout. Mark Benson discussed the layout and indicated that there were no significant recent changes. The discussion turned quickly to the status of CR I. Ron Moorse reported that he had recently spoken with Mn/DOT Metro engineer Scott McBride about CR I, and specifically the potential for safety considerations due to the “weaving” conflict on northbound I35W between the CR I and US 10 interchanges. There has been some speculation (nothing in writing) that Mn/DOT may consider closing access to CR I, which is unacceptable to the City of Shoreview. Mn/DOT is considering other potential solutions, including ramp meters, and Ron indicated that Scott McBride was going to discuss the issue with other Mn/DOT staff. 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com Page 2 of 2 The fourth agenda item was “next steps/process for approvals” and the brief discussion on this topic was essentially that discussions with the FHWA are ongoing. The fifth agenda item was the proposed schedule, and Mark Benson indicated that the schedule is as follows: Ɣ Fall 2009 – Complete preliminary design, project memorandum Ɣ Fall 2010 – Complete final design Ɣ Spring 2011 to Summer 2012 – Project construction in time for TCAAP opening The sixth agenda item was funding, and Mark identified 4 potential funding options that are under consideration, including State /local interchange funding (just $10 million available statewide); federal earmark funding (Mark indicated that Cong. Oberstar and Cong. McCullum are urging locals to first identify local matching funds); Mn/DOT Cooperative Agreement funding (next solicitation for the FY 2011 cycle); and state bridge bonding. The final agenda item was a discussion of the next meeting time. Since the regularly scheduled time was January 1st, (first Thursday of the month?) it was agreed that the next meeting time would be determined later. Attachments: -Agenda -TCAAP 2030 Traffic Analysis – Dec 1, 2008 Item No: 11B2 Meeting Date: December 22, 2008 Type of Business: Administrator Review: _____ City of Mounds View Staff Report To:Honorable Mayor and City Council From:Joe Rhein, Consulting Engineer Item Title/Subject:Report on Red Oak Drive Traffic Counts at Long Lake Road Background: At a recent City Council meeting questions were raised regarding the traffic volume on Red Oak Drive. Staff understanding of the specific questions were: - What is the relative volume of south-bound traffic on Red Oak Drive to the traffic on Long Lake Road? - How does the current or recent total volume on the north end of Red Oak Drive near Long Lake Road compare with historical volumes? Discussion: Relative Traffic of Red Oak Drive to Long Lake Road In response to the questions, Public Work Staffs put traffic counters out at the intersection of Red Oak Drive and Long Lake Road. The counters were set for a 48-hour period, from approximately noon on Tuesday December 2, 2008 to noon on Thursday December 4, 2008. Three locations were counted: - South bound Red Oak Drive, just south of Long Lake Road - East bound Long Lake Road, just west of Red Oak Drive - West bound Long Lake Road, just east of Red Oak Drive The following table summarizes the 48-hour counts obtained. No adjustments or corrections have been applied to the volumes: Location 48-Hour Count East bound Long Lake Road 4,122 West bound Long Lake Road 2,256 South bound Red Oak Drive 1,578 The figure included with this Staff Report shows these counts graphically. December 22, 2008 Item No. 11B 1 Page 2 Historical Traffic Volumes on Red Oak Drive Since Red Oak Drive is a State Aid street, it is on a regular counting schedule. The traffic is counted every odd numbered year. Included with this Staff Report is a chart showing the daily (24-hour) traffic volumes on Red Oak Drive from 1991 to 2008. Note that no count was done in 2001. Also, an extra count was done in 2008. The counts on Red Oak Drive are taken in three locations: just north of County Road 10, just north of Hillview Road, and just south of Long Lake Road. From the chart, it can be seen that the daily volume on Red Oak Drive just south of Long Lake Road varied from 950 to 1,150 vehicles per day throughout most of the 1990’s. Then from 1997 to 1999 the volume increased by approximately 50%, and the daily volume has been in the range of 1,500 to 1,600 vehicles per day for every count since 1999. Respectfully submitted, Joseph R. Rhein, Consulting Engineer Attachments: - Sketch of traffic counts performed – Dec 2-4, 2008 - Daily traffic volume chart – Red Oak Drive: 1991-2008 Existing and Historic Daily Traffic Volumes on Red Oak Drive Red Oak Drive Daily Traffic Volumes Year South of County Line Road North of Hillview North of County Road 10 1991 1125 2175 3400 1993 970 1300 2750 1995 945 2052 3273 1997 1164 2083 3613 1999 1697 2510 3167 2003 1550 2100 2700 2005 1550 2050 2800 2007 1558 2107 3135 2008 1580 2175 3007 Note: 2001 data is unavailable. 2007 and 2008 data provided by the City of Mounds View Red Oak Drive Traffic Volumes 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2003 2005 2007 2008 yearVolume North of Hillview Road North of County Road 10 South of County Line Road 344506v2 SJR MU125-11 Kennedy 470 US Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 & Graven (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax http://www.kennedy-graven.com C H A R T E R E D SCOTT J. RIGGS Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9260 Email: sriggs@kennedy-graven.com MEMORANDUM Date: December 18, 2008 To: Jim Ericson, City Clerk-Administrator From: Scott J. Riggs, City Attorney Re: Mounds View Project Status Report MU125-11: Administration. General discussions with staff regarding various City matters, elections issues, etc. Review requirements for appointing members to various Commissions. Research on the posting of council photos in the newsletter. Consult with City staff regarding same. MU210-35: Community Center Project. Review and consult with City staff regarding Creative Kids Lease at the Community Center. Draft Assignment of Creative Kids Lease and Resolution Approving Lease Assignment. Forward same to City staff. Matter is presently pending. MU210-43: Silver Lake Woods Condominium Association. Work with City staff and City engineer to determine requirements that SLWCA needs to undertake regarding roads. Work with attorney Pat Brinkman regarding matter. Update Petition and Waiver Agreement and Street Transfer Agreement. Work with SLWCA attorney regarding Agreements. Modify Agreement per request of City Council and City staff. Revise Silver Lake Woods Street Transfer Agreement; correspond with P. Brinkman regarding same. Matter is presenting pending. Mr. Jim Ericson December 18, 2008 Page 2 344506v2 SJR MU125-11 MU210-107: Telecommunications. Consult with City staff regarding lease amendment issues and negotiations., cable committee composition, etc. Matter is presently complete. MU210-156: Noel David Collis. This matter has been tendered to the League of MN Cities. K&G is monitoring the status of case. Matter is presently pending. MU210-163: Xcel Easement, Etc. Consult with City staff re same. Review easement received from Xcel and advise City staff regarding same. Matter is presently pending. MU210-166: Billboards. Consult with City staff regarding sign code and billboard amendments. Matter is presently pending. MU210-176: Airport Issues. Consult with City staff regarding runway expansion proposal. Matter is presently pending. MU210-178: 2008 Trail Easements Project. Consult with City staff regarding easement project. Review recently-received easement descriptions and prepare initial draft of easements. Review MnDOT/Mounds View Agreement for this Project. Consult with City staff and MnDOT personnel regarding necessary revisions to the Agreement. Matter is presently pending. MU210-179: 2009-2010 Street Improvement Project. Review materials concerning this project. Consult with City staff. Matter is presently pending. MU210-180: 2008 Personnal Issue. Review correspondence. Consult with City staff regarding matter. Matter is presently pending. EDA MATTERS: MU205-13: General Matters. Review EDA By-Laws and consult with City staff as to revisions.