HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 2009/07/06
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA
MOUNDS VIEW CITY HALL
Monday, July 6, 2009
7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Flaherty, Stigney, Hull, Mueller, Gunn
PUBLIC COMMENT
Citizens may speak to issues not on tonight’s agenda. Before speaking, please give your full
name and address for the minutes. Also, please limit your comments to three minutes.
Agenda Items Discussed by Consensus
__________ 1. Request from the Epilepsy Foundation to talk to the City Council about
allowing their donation bins in business parking lots (Tom Rue, Director of
Operations, Epilepsy Foundation of MN attending)
___________2. Discussion about re-approving the Select Senior Living final plat and
development agreement due to deadline expiration
___________3. Charitable Gambling Contributions to the City
__________ 4. Potential Farmer’s Market Exploratory Committee – Verbal Report
__________ 5. Streets and Utilities Committee – Recommendations for Area B/C of the
Street Improvement Project.
___________6. Five Year Financial Plan 2010 - 2014
___________7. 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update – Review Additions and Revisions
___________8. Discuss Potential Projects for Funding through Bethlehem Baptist Church
Donation
___________ 9. Legal Services Discussion
Next Work Session: Monday, August 3, 2009, at 7:00 p.m.
Next City Council Meeting: Monday, July 13, 2009, at 7:00 p.m.
Item No: 1
Meeting Date: July 6, 2009
Type of Business: WS
Administrator Review: ________
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate
Item Title/Subject: Request by the Epilepsy Foundation of Minnesota to allow
donation bins to be located at Mounds View businesses
Introduction:
City staff noticed that the Epilepsy Foundation has placed green donation bins in the
parking lots of Silver View Plaza and The Station. After staff requested that the bins be
removed, Tom Rue, the Director of Operations for the Epilepsy Foundation of Minnesota
asked if he could talk to the City Council about allowing their bins in the city.
Discussion:
At a worksession in August 2007, the City Council discussed these types of donation bins.
The previous staff report for this discussion is included. At the time, another company had
their donation bins in a few locations around the city. These bins are located on
commercial properties in a very visible location – typically the front of the building. At the
meeting in 2007, the Council decided not to allow the bins since they tend to accumulate
junk around them, are not necessarily visually attractive, or what the Council wants to see
along the city’s main corridors.
Recommendation:
After hearing from the Epilepsy Foundation, direct staff as to whether or not the existing
donation bins may remain in the City.
Respectfully submitted,
Heidi Heller
Planning Associate
Attachments:
1. Worksession staff report regarding donation bins August 2007
Item No: 4C
Meeting Date: August 6, 2007
Type of Business: WS
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: James Ericson, Community Development Director
Item Title/Subject: Review Regulations Associated with
Accessory Collection Boxes and Vending Kiosks
Introduction:
In May, the City was been contacted by Denise Forsberg, a representative of U’SAgain, a
for-profit company which collects used clothing for redistribution at drop-boxes, often located
in parking lots of commercial properties. Ms. Forsberg was seeking permission to locate
collection boxes in the City. Four such boxes are already located in Mounds View—one at
the PAC Building, one at the Laundromat on County Road I and two at the Amoco at County
Road H and County Road 10. The boxes at Amoco are owned by U’SAgain and are located
near the front line of the property along County Road 10. (Refer to the photo on the next
page.) Staff has invited Ms. Forsberg to attend this Council’s meeting.
Discussion:
Staff researched how other communities treat these types of collection boxes and other
vending kiosks such as a Red Box, usually found inside of McDonalds franchises. The
following is but a few responses received on the subject:
Fridley: They do not allow the collection boxes in their community, treating
them as outside storage. A property owner could however apply for a
conditional use permit.
Blaine: Does not permit the collection boxes, indicating that they do not meet
Blaine’s articulated commercial building standards.
Arden Hills: Does not expressly permit such uses, however their planner admitted
that they would probably allow one in the community without a special
use permit.
Spring Lake Park: They allow such collection boxes.
Shoreview: These are permitted in non-residential districts through the formal Site
and Building Plan Review process - Planning Commission review and
Council approve/deny. City Code defines them as accessory
structures. Location, setbacks and screening are the principal
considerations.
Staff’s concern with these boxes is that they contribute to clutter, bear no association to the
host property (in contrast with a video drop box, for example, at a video store) and that they
often become unsightly, aesthetically displeasing and a drop-off point for non-clothing debris
and other junk. U’SAgain asserts that they have an impeccable record for maintenance and
collection and that their boxes would not become unsightly.
U’SAgain Report
August 6, 2007
Page 2
Given that there are already such uses in the corridor, staff has serious reservations about
expressly allowing more such uses. Granted, the recycling of clothing is a worthwhile
endeavor, even if operated as a for-profit business, however staff would assert that these
uses are usually not a related, incidental accessory uses to most commercial businesses and
thus should not be permitted.
If the City Council were inclined to allow such uses and other unrelated incidental accessory
uses, staff would recommend that the collection box or vending kiosk be located behind the
front line of the host building and adjacent the building as opposed to elsewhere on the lot;
and limit the number of such kiosks or collection boxes to one, and only one. Temporary
recycling collection drop offs (often seen in parking lots of schools as a fund raising event)
could be exempted from any adopted restrictions.
Recommendation:
Staff is seeking direction at this point as to how to proceed with the issue of permanent
accessory recycled clothing collection boxes and other types of vending kiosks in the City of
Mounds View.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
James Ericson
Community Development Director
Two of U’SAgain
clothing recycling boxes
at the Amoco Gas station
located at the corner of
County Road 10 and
County Road H. (Note
the garbage bags
alongside the boxes.)
Item No: 2
Meeting Date: July 6, 2009
Type of Business: WS
City Administrator Review: ________
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate
Item Title/Subject: Discuss Request to Reapprove the Final Plat and
Development Agreement for the “Select Senior Living”
Development;
Introduction:
On October 27, 2008, the City Council passed Resolution 7347, which approved the
final plat and development agreement for the Select Senior Living development. This
was the last of the Council actions required in order for the project to move forward. Per
city code, an applicant has 120 days to record the plat with Ramsey County, and if the
recording does not happen within this timeframe, the plat approval is void. The code
also states that the plat can be reapproved and the applicant given up to another 120
days. Due to the shakeup within the banking industry, Select Senior Living was not able
to start the project within the allowed 120 days and their final plat and development
agreement approval is now void.
Chapter 1202.07: Final Plat Approval Procedure
Subd. 4. Recording of Final Plat: If the final plat is approved, the subdivider shall, within
one hundred twenty (120) days, record it with the County Register of Deeds or
Registrar of Titles and, within ten (10) days of recording, furnish the City with a
reproducible copy of the final plat showing evidence of the recording; otherwise, the
approval of the final plat shall be void, and the Clerk-Administrator shall so notify
the County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles.
Subd. 5. Re-Approval: In the event the plat is not recordable as approved or the
subdivider fails to record within the time prescribed herein, the Council may
re-approve the final plat upon the following terms and conditions: a) that the
subdivider proves to the satisfaction of the Council that the delay was caused by
conditions beyond the control of the subdivider, and b) that the extension of time
requested has or will have no adverse effect on the City or property owners of the
City, and c) that the Council shall set the time limit of the extension requested but in
no event shall it exceed one hundred twenty (120) days. (1988 Code §42.05; 1993
Code).
Select Senior Living Report
July 6, 2009
Page 2
Discussion:
Select Senior Living, represented by Joel Larson, has submitted a letter requesting the
final plat and development agreement be reapproved. They have always intended to
move forward with the project but unfortunately ran into problems beyond their control.
A contractor was chosen and the building permit application and plans were submitted
in February. Mr. Larson indicated that they have now received a letter of commitment
from a bank and should be able to move forward again with the project.
Recommendations:
Staff requests that the City Council discuss the request to reapprove the Select Senior
Living final plat and development agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
Heidi Heller
Planning Associate
Attachments:
1. Letter from Joel Larson, Select Companies
2. Approved Resolution 7347
RESOLUTION NO. 7347
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE “SELECT SENIOR LIVING”
FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT;
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. MA2008-002
WHEREAS, Joel Larson, representing Select Senior Living has requested
approval of the final plat and the Development Agreement for the “Select Senior Living”
project on three properties legally-described as follows:
Lot 49, Auditor’s Subdivision Number 89, Subject to a 5 foot strip easement along
the rear line for public utility use, Ramsey County , Minnesota (PIN 063023310030)
And,
That part of Lot 48, Auditors Subdivision Number 89 lying South of the
North 300 feet front and rear thereof, except that portion taken for the
highway right of way purposes. Subject to restrictions contained in
Document Number 238161,
Ramsey County, Minnesota (PIN 063023310029)
And,
The South 150 feet of the North 300 feet, front and rear of Lot 48, Auditors
Subdivision Number 89, including any portion of any street of alley adjacent
thereto, vacated or to be vacated, together with all road privileges,
easements and appurtenances thereto attached,
Ramsey County, Minnesota (PIN 063023310028)
WHEREAS, The applicant has requested to rezone the above-described lands to
R-4, High Density Residential which are currently designated as Mixed-Use PUD in the
Comprehensive Plan; and,
WHEREAS, Select Senior Living has submitted a Final Plat, date stamped
October 23, 2008, for the major subdivision which combines three lots into one parcel;
and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 1204.04, Subd. 4, the subdivision is
subject to a park dedication fee which would be equivalent to 10% of the assessed
value of the project area and a County Highway 10 Trail Contribution; and,
WHEREAS, the grading and drainage plan has been reviewed and approved by
the City Engineering consultant and the Rice Creek Watershed District has given
conditional approval; and,
Resolution 7347
Page 2
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the following
documents regarding this proposal:
1. Preliminary Plat
2. Zoning Map
3. Site Plan, dated September 4, 2008
4. Grading, Utility & Landscape Plans, dated September 18, 2008
5. Planning Commission Resolutions 891-08, 892-08 and 893-08
6. Resolution 7321, Approved September 8, 2008
7. Ordinance 813, First Reading on September 8, 2008
8. Development Agreement
9. Final Plat, dated October 23, 2008
WHEREAS, on August 25, 2008 and September 8, 2008, the Mounds View City
Council held a duly noticed public hearing about this development and major
subdivision and approved Resolution 7321 that approved the “Select Senior Living”
preliminary plat; and,
WHEREAS, the City attorney and City engineering consultant have reviewed the
final plat and finds it to be in conformance with all applicable sections of the Mounds
View Municipal Code, subject to the conditions and requirements contained in this
Resolution; and,
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the proposed final plat
for the “Select Senior Living” subdivision, and finds it to be consistent with the
preliminary plat and in conformance with Resolution 7321, and with all applicable
sections of the Mounds View Municipal Code, subject to the conditions and
requirements contained in this Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council, having
already approved the preliminary plat, approves the final plat and Development Agreement
for the “Select Senior Living” subdivision, subject to stipulations as follows:
1. Prior to the Final Plat execution, Select Senior Living shall pay to the City a
park dedication fee in the amount of $32,150.00 and a County Highway 10
Trail Contribution in the amount of $8,040.
2. Select Senior Living shall enter into the Development Agreement with the
City and said document shall be recorded with Ramsey County.
3. Select Senior Living shall obtain final approval from Rice Creek Watershed
District and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency before construction
activity begins.
4. No demolition, grading or construction activity may proceed without the
contractor obtaining all necessary permits.
Resolution 7347
Page 3
5. All utilities within the development area shall be located underground.
6. The developer or contractor shall obtain the necessary permits for any and
all work occurring within the City and County right of way.
7. Select Senior Living shall successfully complete any and all requirements
after final review of the final plat by the City Attorney.
8. The approval contemplated herein is subject to the condition that Select
Senior Living must pay for all costs concerning this subdivision incurred by
the City Attorney, city consultants, and any other costs of a similar nature.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that approval of this final plat
and Development Agreement is subject to recordation with Ramsey County, which shall
occur within one hundred twenty (120) days of Council approval. Within 10 days of the
recording, Select Senior Living shall furnish the City with proof of the recording;
otherwise, the approval of the final plat shall be void.
Adopted this 27th day of October, 2008.
_____________________________________
Rob Marty, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
James Ericson, Clerk - Administrator
(SEAL)
Item No: 03
Meeting Date: July 6, 2009
Type of Business: Work Session
Administrator Review: _________
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Desaree Crane, Assistant City Clerk-Administrator
Item Title/Subject: Charitable Gambling Ordinance Review
Introduction:
The City Council expressed a desire to review the City Code pertaining to charitable
gambling, which is found in Chapter 502. Specifically, the Council wanted to revisit the
possibility of requiring charitable gambling organizations to contribute ten percent of net
profits to the City as allowed by state law, MN Statutes 349.213.
Background:
On January 28, 2002, the City Council passed Ordinance 691 (attached), which revised
language regarding the City’s trade area. There was some discussion then in having
the charitable gambling organizations contribute 10% of their earnings into a city fund,
and the discussion continued on December 10, 2001, January 14 and 28, 2002, and
again at the March 2005 Work Session. Ultimately, the Council was opposed to
requiring such payments.
Discussion:
This issue was discussed again at the March 2009 Work Session, and Staff was
directed by the City Council to invite the charitable organizations to attend a meeting to
discuss this possibility. Staff has contacted all the charitable organizations and invited
them to this Work Session for an open discussion.
Attached are staff reports along with the Minutes from previous meetings for the
Council’s reference. The City of Maplewood currently has a ten percent contribution
policy (their City Code pertaining to the contribution is attached). Other cities such as
Arden Hills, Shoreview (Shoreview requires 10% contribution per quarter), and St. Paul
have similar policies. Changing the Code to require licensed charitable gambling
organizations to contribute ten percent of their net profits would guarantee that
proceeds from the charitable gambling operation would be spent in the City of Mounds
View directly.
Direction:
Staff seeks guidance from the City Council on whether the City Code should be
amended to require charitable gambling organizations to contribute ten percent of their
net gambling profits to the City.
Charitable Gambling Report
July 6, 2009
Page 2
If the City Council supports such a code amendment, a determination would need to be
made on how the contributions would be subsequently distributed. One example would
be to dedicate the proceeds to the Festival in the Park. The law is fairly clear that the
contributions cannot simply be used for general fund City operation.
MN Statutes 349.213:
A city may adopt “an ordinance requirement that such organizations must contribute ten percent
per year of their net profits derived from lawful gambling conducted at premises within the city's
or county's jurisdiction to a fund administered and regulated by the responsible local unit of
government without cost to such fund, for disbursement by the responsible local unit of
government of the receipts for (i) charitable contributions as defined in section 349.12,
subdivision 7a, or (ii) police, fire, and other emergency or public safety-related services,
equipment, and training, excluding pension obligations…”
A full list of allowable charitable contributions can be found on the next page and
thereafter.
Conclusion:
Given the loss of state aid and other reductions in revenue sources, the City Council
may want to consider adopting an amendment to require the charitable gambling
organizations to contribute ten percent of their net gambling profits to the City. It should
be noted however that charitable gambling revenues have decreased consistent with
the economy and the charitable gambling organizations have less revenue with which to
fund their own priorities.
Respectfully submitted,
Desaree Crane
Allowable Expenditures
MN Statute 349.12, Subd. 7a.Charitable contribution.
"Charitable contribution" means one or more of the lawful purposes expenditures under
section 349.12, subdivision 25, paragraph (a), clauses (1) to (7), (10), (11), (13) to (15),
and (19).
Subd. 25.Lawful purpose.
(a) "Lawful purpose" means one or more of the following:
(1) any expenditure by or contribution to a 501(c)(3) or festival organization, as defined in
subdivision 15a, provided that the organization and expenditure or contribution are in conformity
with standards prescribed by the board under section 349.154, which standards must apply to both
types of organizations in the same manner and to the same extent;
(2) a contribution to or expenditure for goods and services for an individual or family
suffering from poverty, homelessness, or disability, which is used to relieve the effects of that
suffering;
(3) a contribution to a program recognized by the Minnesota Department of Human Services
for the education, prevention, or treatment of problem gambling;
(4) a contribution to or expenditure on a public or private nonprofit educational institution
registered with or accredited by this state or any other state;
(5) a contribution to an individual, public or private nonprofit educational institution
registered with or accredited by this state or any other state, or to a scholarship fund of a
nonprofit organization whose primary mission is to award scholarships, for defraying the cost of
education to individuals where the funds are awarded through an open and fair selection process;
(6) activities by an organization or a government entity which recognize military service to
the United States, the state of Minnesota, or a community, subject to rules of the board, provided
that the rules must not include mileage reimbursements in the computation of the per diem
reimbursement limit and must impose no aggregate annual limit on the amount of reasonable and
necessary expenditures made to support:
(i) members of a military marching or color guard unit for activities conducted within the
state;
(ii) members of an organization solely for services performed by the members at funeral
services;
(iii) members of military marching, color guard, or honor guard units may be reimbursed for
participating in color guard, honor guard, or marching unit events within the state or states
contiguous to Minnesota at a per participant rate of up to $35 per diem; or
(iv) active military personnel and their immediate family members in need of support
services;
(7) recreational, community, and athletic facilities and activities intended primarily for
persons under age 21, provided that such facilities and activities do not discriminate on the basis
of gender and the organization complies with section 349.154;
(10) a contribution to the United States, this state or any of its political subdivisions, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof other than a direct contribution to a law enforcement or
prosecutorial agency;
(11) a contribution to or expenditure by a nonprofit organization which is a church or body
of communicants gathered in common membership for mutual support and edification in piety,
worship, or religious observances;
(13) a contribution to or expenditure on projects or activities approved by the commissioner
of natural resources for:
(i) wildlife management projects that benefit the public at large;
(ii) grant-in-aid trail maintenance and grooming established under sections 84.83 and 84.927,
and other trails open to public use, including purchase or lease of equipment for this purpose; and
(iii) supplies and materials for safety training and educational programs coordinated by the
Department of Natural Resources, including the Enforcement Division;
(14) conducting nutritional programs, food shelves, and congregate dining programs
primarily for persons who are age 62 or older or disabled;
(15) a contribution to a community arts organization, or an expenditure to sponsor arts
programs in the community, including but not limited to visual, literary, performing, or musical
arts;
(19) a contribution or expenditure to honor an individual's humanitarian service as
demonstrated through philanthropy or volunteerism to the United States, this state, or local
community.
Item No: _5__
Meeting Date: _July 6, 2009_
Type of Business: __WS__
Administrator Review: ____
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Nick DeBar, Public Works Director
Item Title/Subject: Streets and Utilities Committee - Recommendations for
Area B/C of the Street and Utility Improvement Project
Introduction:
During 2007, the Street and Utilities Task Force developed a Street and Utility Improvement
Program (SUIP) to reconstruct approximately 26 miles of City-owned streets over a 10-year
period. The Task Force developed design standards to be used in the program, including
standards for street section, curbing material, curbing type, street width, pedestrian/bicycle
accommodations, utilities, stormwater management, and mailbox groupings. The SUIP was
approved and design standards adopted by the City Council on October 22, 2007
(Resolution 7176).
The City Council established a Streets and Utilities Committee (Committee) on February 11,
2008 to oversee the implementation of the SUIP (Resolution 7223). Among other duties, the
Committee was charged with advising and providing recommendations to the City Council on
design issues encountered during the various stages of implementing the SUIP.
The Committee reviewed design issues and options for non-standard streets in Areas B and
C of the SUIP on May 18, 2009, April 20, 2009, and June 15, 2009. On June 2, 2009, a
public information meeting was held to present the non-standard street design issues and
options. Property owners adjacent to streets in Areas B and C were invited to the meeting
and participated by asking questions and commenting on the proposed design options.
Feedback forms were distributed to citizens and completed forms collected and summarized
by Staff after the information meeting to gather public input.
Through the course of the meetings held thus far, the Committee has reached a decision on
most non-standard street design issues for Areas B and C of the SUIP. The Committee
passed votes on June 15, 2009 to recommend a particular design option for the non-
standard streets under review.
Discussion:
All non-standard roads in Areas B and C have design issues relating to street widths and
pedestrian/bicycle accommodations. The SUIP provides the following standards to be used
when encountered with these design issues:
Street Width Standard:
Typical streets will have a width of 28 feet measured from face of curb to face of curb.
Streets currently between 26 and 32 feet wide will be reconstructed to the 28 foot standard.
Other streets, including Municipal State Aid Streets and streets designated as pedestrian
corridors, will have their reconstructed width evaluated on a street-by-street and project-by-
project basis.
Pedestrian/Bicycle Accommodations Standard:
Sidewalks and trailways in the City’s Comprehensive Sidewalk/Trailway Plan may be
installed as part of an area’s street and utility improvement project. If a sidewalk or trailway
is parallel to an existing roadway, the City will develop pedestrian/bicycle options including,
but not limited to:
Designating the shoulder of the roadway for pedestrian/bicycle movement;
A separate walkway on one side of the roadway;
A separate walkway on both sides of the roadway.
Options and cost estimates will be presented at a neighborhood meeting. It will ultimately be
the City Council’s decision whether a planned sidewalk or trailway will be built with a street
project.
A summary of the recommendations coming forward to the City Council from the Committee
are discussed below. Please note that recommendations are not listed in any particular
order of priority.
Area B Street Issues:
Springview Lane: Non-Standard Street Width
Knollwood Drive: Pedestrian/Bicycle Accommodations
Woodcrest Drive: Pedestrian/Bicycle Accommodations
Springview Lane: Non-Standard Street Width
Springview Lane is an “L”-shaped, dead-end road located off the west side of Knollwood
Drive between County Road H and Spring Creek. The current width of the road is only 22.5
feet and a substandard turn-around exists at the dead end portion. The roadway terminates
at a residential driveway with no clear delineation between public street and private
driveways. In addition, there are many mature oak trees in and around the dead end and
some steeper grades exist.
The existing public right-of-way is also very narrow. The right-of-way width for the east-west
segment is only 40 feet and the width for the north-south segment is 60 feet. The standard
right-of-way width is commonly 66 feet on all the other streets in the project area. A small
number of homes exist on the roadway and traffic volume is low.
Staff recommended to the Committee that Springview Lane be reconstructed to a width of 24
feet for the following reasons:
The 24-foot width most closely matches the existing width;
The existing right-of-way is significantly less than standard in the east-west direction;
Springview Lane is a dead end street that serves a small number of homes, and
therefore low daily traffic volumes;
Widening the road would result in the loss of two trees and two shrubs; and
Widening the road would require a retaining wall on the property in the NW corner of
Springview Lane and Knollwood Drive.
The existing right-of-way and topography also make it difficult to provide an adequate cul-de-
sac, hammerhead, or other “turnaround” at the dead-end of the street. Discussion of dead-
end options included:
Terminating Springview Lane at the right-of-way line;
Constructing concrete curb across the north end (i.e. at the terminus) to indicate the end
of the public street;
Constructing curb cuts and commercial strength concrete driveway aprons on the
driveways in the area so that City maintenance vehicles (i.e. snow plows) can use the
driveways for turning maneuvers, as they currently do; and
Constructing a “dog-elbow” or bump-out on the outside radius at the 90 degree bend
(corner) in the road.
Street width options for Springview Lane presented at the June 2, 2009 public information
meeting included the following (with public feedback responses tallied–see attached
feedback summary):
1. Widen Springview Lane approximately 1.5 feet to the City minimum standard width of 24
feet (17/22=77%);
2. Widen Springview Lane approximately 5.5 feet to the City standard of 28 feet (2/22=9%);
3. No opinion (3/22=14%).
The Committee recommends (6-0, Bjerke absent) that Springview Lane be reconstructed to
a street width of 24 feet measured from face-to-face of curb. The Committee further
recommends that an engineered solution be determined for the turn-around issue at the
dead-end of the roadway during final design.
Knollwood Drive and Woodcrest Drive: Pedestrian/Bicycle Accommodations
Knollwood Drive and Woodcrest Drive are designated as potential pedestrian/bicycle
corridors in the City’s Comprehensive Sidewalk/Trailway Plan. The roads are currently 28 to
29 feet wide and will be reconstructed to the City’s standard street width of 28 feet from face-
to-face of curb per the adopted SUIP standards.
The Feasibility Report for the 2005 Street Improvement Project (now known as Area B),
dated March 2005, included provisions for the construction of a concrete sidewalk along the
east side of Knollwood Drive, from County Road H to County Road H2, and along the south
side of Woodcrest Drive, from Knollwood Drive to Silver Lake Road. The costs for the
sidewalks were estimated in the Report to be approximately $220,000 for Knollwood Drive
and $35,000 for Woodcrest Drive. The cost per linear foot of the sidewalk on Knollwood
Drive is approximately twice the cost per linear foot on Woodcrest Drive. This is due to the
extensive grading and retaining walls needed to construct the sidewalk, along with high costs
related to crossing Spring Creek.
The Report also stated that if a sidewalk was constructed on Silver Lake Road, from County
Road H to County Road H2, then the sidewalk along Knollwood Drive would be redundant
and not necessary due to its close proximity to Silver Lake Road (i.e. one block away).
Furthermore, if the sidewalk on Knollwood Drive is not constructed, there would be little need
for a sidewalk on Woodcrest Drive to connect Knollwood Drive to Silver Lake Road.
A sidewalk was constructed along Silver Lake Road, from County Road H to County Road
H2, during the summer of 2006. Therefore, for reasons mentioned above, construction of a
sidewalk on Knollwood Drive and Woodcrest Drive is no longer considered required or cost
effective. The relatively low volume of pedestrian traffic, coupled with the close proximity of
the existing Silver Lake Road sidewalk, suggest that additional sidewalks are not necessary
in the area. The existing sidewalk is on the east side of Silver Lake Road, which would
necessitate an uncontrolled crossing of Silver Lake Road (i.e. traffic on Silver Lake Road
does not stop at Woodcrest Drive) if a sidewalk is installed on Woodcrest Drive.
Pedestrian/bicycle accommodation options presented at the June 2, 2009 public information
meeting included the following:
1. Construct Knollwood Drive/Woodcrest Drive without pedestrian accommodations
(Knollwood: 24/26=92%, Woodcrest: 24/24=100%);
2. Construct Knollwood Drive/Woodcrest Drive with an off-street sidewalk (Knollwood:
2/26=8%, Woodcrest: 0/24=0%);
3. Construct Knollwood Drive/Woodcrest Drive with an on-street designated lane
(Knollwood: 0/26=0%, Woodcrest: 0/24=0%);
4. No opinion (Knollwood: 0/26=0%, Woodcrest: 0/24=0%).
The Committee recommends (6-0, Bjerke absent) that reconstruction of Knollwood Drive
and Woodcrest Drive does not include any pedestrian/bicycle accommodations.
Area C Street Issues:
Irondale Road: Non-Standard Street Width Impacts
Woodcrest Drive: Pedestrian/Bicycle Accommodations
Edgewood Drive: Non-Standard Street Width + Pedestrian/Bicycle Accommodations
Bona Road: Non-Standard Street Width
Irondale Road: Non-Standard Street Width Impacts
Irondale Road has existing back-to-back of curb widths of 26 feet between County Road H
and Woodcrest Drive and 32 feet between Woodcrest Drive and County Road H2. Both
widths fall within the guidelines created by the SUIP standards and therefore, don’t require
further consideration. However, there are substantial impacts on the segment between
County Road H and Woodcrest Drive that should be known before proceeding with the
standard typical section.
The southeast lot on corner of Irondale and Woodcrest may require approximately 95 feet of
retaining wall and several power poles could require relocation. It is possible to mitigate
these impacts by constructing a 24 foot wide roadway as opposed to the standard section of
28 feet wide. This would better match the existing width condition and offer less impervious
surfacing and consequently less storm water treatment. However, a 24 foot wide roadway
would not match the larger width of the remainder of Irondale Road north of Woodcrest,
which currently accounts for approximately 75% of Irondale Road included in Area C.
Street width options for Irondale Road presented at the June 2, 2009 public information
meeting included the following:
1. Narrow Irondale Road between CR H and Woodcrest by approximately 1.5 feet to the
City minimum standard width of 24 feet (7/17=41%);
2. Widen Irondale Road between CR H and Woodcrest approximately 2.5 feet to the City
standard of 28 feet (9/17=53%);
3. No opinion (0/17=0%);
4. Write-in (1/17=6%).
The Committee recommends (6-0, Bjerke absent) that Irondale Road be reconstructed to the
Task Force standard street width of 28 feet measured from face-to-face of curb.
Woodcrest Drive: Pedestrian/Bicycle Accommodations
The portion of Woodcrest Drive in Area C (between Bona Road and Long Lake Road) is
designated as a potential pedestrian/bicycle corridor in the City’s Comprehensive
Sidewalk/Trailway Plan. The road is currently 30 feet wide and will be reconstructed to the
City’s standard street width of 28 feet from face-to-face of curb.
This segment of Woodcrest Drive is an east-west connection to Edgewood Middle School for
students living west of the school. Pedestrian/bicycle accommodations in the north
boulevard are preferable to the south boulevard since the accommodations will align better
with an existing City-owned paved walkway easement connecting Bona Road to Edgewood
Drive. A small piece of sidewalk would be required on the east side of Bona Road to
connect to the paved easement walkway. Pedestrian/bicycle accommodations would
complete a pathway route from sidewalks on the Edgewood Drive to the Long Lake Road.
Estimated additional costs for a 6.5 foot off-street sidewalk is $59,000 and for an on-street
designated lane is $52,000 over the no accommodations option. The existing turf boulevard
would decrease approximately 6 to 6.5 feet for either accommodation and may require a
small retaining wall for a portion of the sidewalk/designated lane.
Pedestrian/bicycle accommodation options presented at the June 2, 2009 public information
meeting included the following:
1. Construct Woodcrest Drive without pedestrian accommodations (12/16=75%);
2. Construct Woodcrest Drive with an off-street sidewalk (1/16=6%);
3. Construct Woodcrest Drive with an on-street designated lane (3/16=19%);
4. No opinion (0/16=0%).
The Committee recommends (5-0, Glazer abstain, Bjerke absent) that reconstruction of
Woodcrest Drive between Long Lake Road and Bona Road include an off-street sidewalk,
including a spur of off-street sidewalk on the east side of Bona Road connecting to the City-
owned paved walkway easement leading to Edgewood Middle School.
Edgewood Drive: Non-Standard Street Width + Pedestrian/Bicycle Accommodations
Edgewood Drive is a Municipal State Aid street between County Road H and County Road
H2. It is also a designated pedestrian corridor in the City’s Comprehensive
Sidewalk/Trailway Plan. Therefore, there are many options for the reconstruction of
Edgewood Drive. It currently exists as a wide roadway with 12 foot drive lanes and 10 foot
parking lanes on each side, with a total width of 45 feet face-to-face of curb. Adjacent to the
back of curb on the east side, from County Road H to approximately 600 feet north, is a five
foot sidewalk. Edgewood Middle School is located on the east side of the road, just north of
County Road H, and Robert’s Bar is also on the southeast corner of the intersection with
County Road H2.
Edgewood Drive is signed “No Parking” on the west side of the road from County Road H to
Woodale Drive and on the east side of the road from the school entrance north to Woodale
Drive. It is signed “No Parking after 6 p.m.” on both sides of the road from Woodale Drive to
County Road H2. The existing curb and gutter on Edgewood Drive was assessed by City
and Bonestroo staff. It was determined that the curb was in poor condition due to the lack of
aggregate base course used in its reconstruction in 1984. It is estimated that only 50% of
the existing curb and gutter is salvageable.
Several configurations and options for reconstruction of Edgewood Drive were developed
based on the existing conditions. The major issues of the existing roadway are summarized
as follows:
Existing curb is in poor condition;
Existing street width is very wide, contributing to unnecessary impervious surfacing and
expensive initial and on-going maintenance costs;
Existing sidewalk is narrower than City standard and causing public works maintenance
issues with snow plowing;
Parking is severely limited even though parking lanes are provided on both sides for
entire length;
Provide accommodations for Edgewood MS needs.
Edgewood Drive options contained in the draft Feasibility Report were discussed by the
Committee on May 18, 2009 and subsequently narrowed down to two options for
presentation at the public information meeting on June 2, 2009 at the request of the
Committee. Each option eliminated the west parking lane, kept the east parking lane, and
replacing all existing curbing. An option of the “as-is” condition was not considered.
Parking on the east side was considered important for several reasons. School drop off and
pick up traffic is confined to the school (east) side of the road and off-street sidewalk/trail
accommodations allow students to step out of the vehicles onto a solid surface. East side
parking also eliminates the need to cross the street for student drop offs/pick ups or any
evening school activities. In addition, no side streets exist on the east side of Edgewood
Drive north of Woodale Drive. Several streets exist of the west side which would allow on-
street parking for property owners on the west side.
Option 1 provided one 14 foot southbound (SB) drive lane, one 12 foot northbound (NB)
drive lane, one 8 foot parking lane on the east, and an 11 foot, off-street, shared-use asphalt
trail behind the east top back of curb (total width of 34 feet face-to-face of curb). This option
provides 100% off-street pedestrian and bicycle accommodations. State Aid Standards
require a shared-use trail be constructed at a minimum of three feet off the back of curb
where a parking lane exists. Since the minimum width of a shared use trail is 8 feet, this
creates an 11 foot bituminous trail. The multi-use trail is also a missing link between the
multi-use trails located along County Roads H and H2.
Option 2 provided two 12 foot drive lanes, one 8 foot dual-use parking/bike lane on the east,
and 5.5 foot, on-street bike lane on the west for SB traffic (total width of 38 feet face-to-face
of curb). This option provides 100% off-street pedestrian accommodations but all bicycle
accommodations are on-street.
Lengthy discussions were had during the June 2, 2009 public information meeting while
Edgewood Drive options were presented. A group of property owners in Area C wanted to
see Edgewood Drive remain the same configuration as it currently exists. Traffic, safety,
pedestrian movements, parking, pavement conditions, and other items were discussed
during the presentation. Edgewood Drive options presented at the June 2, 2009 public
information meeting included the following:
1. Option 1: 34 foot total width (f-f curb) with multi-use trail (9/26=35%);
2. Option 2: 38 foot total width (f-f curb) with off-street sidewalk and on-street bike lane
(5/26=19%);
3. Option 3: No opinion (2/26=8%);
4. Write-in (10/26=38%).
Nine of the ten write-in comments were in favor of reconstructing Edgewood Drive to the
same configuration that currently exists. No representatives from Edgewood Middle School
staff were present nor any students or parents that identified themselves as such. Staff met
with Edgewood Middle School staff and the school resource officer (SRO) on April 15, 2009
to review the proposed options. School staff and the SRO felt that Option 1 would best
serve the needs and functions of the students and school activities.
The Committee did not vote on Edgewood Drive options and directed Staff to look at some
other options for a future meeting to discuss Edgewood Drive reconstruction design options.
Recommendation:
Staff is looking for direction from the City Council with regard to these recommendations
from the Streets and Utilities Committee to accommodate final design and plan/specification
preparation activities to proceed accordingly. The direction from the Council on these issues
will be prepared as a Resolution to be brought back to the Council for formal approval at a
future City Council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Nick DeBar
Public Works Director
6-3-09 Survey Tally
24 ft 28 ft No Opinion Write - In None
Off-
street
SW
On-street
designated
use No Opinion Write - In None
Off-street
SW
On-street
designated
use No Opinion Write - In Resident Address
X Amelia Sullivan 2717 Woodcrest Dr
X X X Blank
X X X Bob Espeseth 6946 Knollwood Dr
X X X Sue Espeseth 6946 Knollwood Dr
X X X Tom Johnson 7060 Knollwood Dr
X X X Pat & Cathy Stampfle 7074 Knollwood Dr
X X X C and A Keller 2908 Spring View Ln
X X X C and B Asproth 2948 Spring View Ln
X X X K and R Johnson 6926 Knollwood Dr
X James Burgquell 2932 Spring View Ln
X X X Karla Ollauketo 2916 Spring View Ln
X X X Simon 3017 Woodale Dr
X Lucille Kleinendorst 6945 Knollwood Dr
X X X Jim and Amy Wilson 7025 Pleasant View
X X X Steven Santee 7085 Knollwood Dr
X X X N and C Meisner 2909 Woodale
X X X Brian Amundsen 3048 Woodale
X X X BLANK
X Paul Thorson 2849 Co Rd H
X X Janine Rhings 7172 Knollwood Dr
X X X P and C Christensen 3000 Woodale Dr
X X X JoAnn Valley 2808 Woodale Dr
X X Gina Wesner 2833 Woodcrest Dr
X X X G. and G. Blanski 2933 Woodale Dr
Dorothy Nelson 2901 Spring View Ln
X X X Dan and Emily Thery 2909 Spring View Ln
X X X D. Sorenson & Kenzee Moore2748 Woodcrest Dr
X X Char Portwood 6950 Knollwood Dr
X X Rudnik 7191 Knollwood Dr
X D. and J. Lindberg 7188 Knollwood Dr
17 2 3 0 25 2 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0
77%9%14%0%93%7%0%0%0%100%0%0%0%0%
Majority Opinion
Spring View Lane
- Construct at 24 feet wide
Knollwood Drive
- Construct with no specific pedestrian accomodations
Woodcrest Drive
- Construct with no specific pedestrian accomodationsCo Rd 10 Access
Woodcrest Drive
Pedestrian Accommodations
Spring View Lane
Width Options Pedestrian Accommodations
Knollwood Drive
6-3-09 Survey Tally
24 ft 28 ft No Opinion Write - In None
Off-
street
SW
On-street
designated
use No Opinion Write - In 1 2 No Opinion Write - In Resident Address
26'X X M. Gaucett 5210 Jeffery Dr
X X X Jeremy Brown 2476 Ridge Ln
X X X Farrell Potter 5237 Irondale Rd
X X X K. Jacobson, C. Erickson 5070 Irondale Rd
X X X R M LeNew 5249 Irondale Rd
X X Blank 5201 Irondale Rd
X X X J. and M. Donaaliue 5135 Bona Rd
X X X V. and B. Hjelm 2500 Woodcrest Dr
X X Re do street as currently is Ken Gladen 5149 Edgewood Dr
Leave the street alone Mildred Goeftsch 5220 Edgewood Dr
No sidewalk etc Duane Freeberg 5210 Edgewood Dr
Leave config. as is (save costs)Kenneth Glidden 5240 Edgewood Dr
X X X Blank Area C
Preferance is existing width and config.Jack Hinrichs 5179 Edgewood Dr
X X *Modify to add sw on west and narrow trail S. and J. Walther 2425 Ridge Ln
X X Stay the same 45' wide with sidewalk David Chase 5244 Skiba Dr
X X X *Install ALL new curb J. and C. Nick 5213 Irondale Rd
X X Leave width at 45 feet Florence B Olson 5080 Irondale Rd
X Charlotte Thill 5092 Long Lake Rd
Leave at 45 feet Agnes Manthey 2425 Woodale Dr
X *Concerned about parking Susan Link 2427 Clearview
X X X R. and K. Lockwood 5141 Irondale Rd
X X X Gloria Pajunen 5261 Irondale Rd
X C. and P. Mesenbring 5091 Edgewood Dr
45 unless too expensive then option 1 D. and A. Homuth 5051 Edgewood Dr
Leave as is D. and P. Warwick 5081 Edgewood Dr
X X X Blank Area C
X *Add sidewalk on west side w/ blvd Sean Walther 2425 Ridge Ln
7 9 0 1 12 1 3 0 0 9 6 2 10
41%53%0%6%75%6%19%0%0%33%22%7%37%
Majority Opinion
Woodcrest Drive
- No specific pedestrian accommodations
No Clear Public Consensus
Edgewood Drive Confirguration
Irondale Road Width
Edgewood Drive
Options
Irondale Road
Width Options Pedestrian Accommodations
Woodcrest Drive
Item No: 6.
Meeting Date: July 6, 2009
Type of Business: Work session
Administrator Review: ____
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Mark Beer, Finance Director
Item Title/Subject: Five Year Financial Plan 2010 - 2014
The City Charter, Chapter 7.05, requires that a Five Year Financial Plan (FYFP) be prepared
annually. It must be presented at a public hearing and adopted by ordinance.
General Fund Operating Budget
This document projects revenues and expenses for the General Fund for the next five years. It
reflects the cuts of $147,000 and $340,000 in local government aid in 2009 and 2010. 2010 is out
of balance since the City Council and department staff has not worked out a solution to the cuts.
That solution will be determined in the coming months as the 2010 budget is developed.
Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund
This document lists all of the City’s vehicles and major pieces of equipment. It provides a schedule
for their replacement and calculates the amount that the General Fund and other funds should be
contributing to the Vehicle Fund each year. When a vehicle is up for replacement, the Vehicle Fund
will transfer the needed money to the responsible fund, which will budget for the replacement.
Capital Improvement Funds
This two-part report has sections headed “Capital Improvement Program” and “Impact on Capital
Projects Funds’ Cash Balances.” The Capital Improvement Program 2009 – 2018 lists all projects
that are contemplated during the five-year period. Some of these projects may be deleted later and
others may be added as needs become apparent. The Capital Projects Funds’ Cash Balances
reports the current resources of the Capital Projects Funds and the revenues that are anticipated to
become available for projects.
Utility Rate Studies
These reports detail the revenues, operating expenses, and capital projects of each of the City’s
four utilities over the next five years. The reports project the utility rates that will be needed to keep
each utility financially solvent.
Long Range Financial Plan Adoption
The LRFP will always be a work-in-progress. It is continuously reviewed and frequently modified
throughout the year as additional information becomes available. This is a working document and
does not commit the City to any specific course of action or project.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Mark Beer
Finance Director
City of Mounds ViewFive Year Financial PlanGeneral Fund Multi-year Operating Budget 2010 thru 20140% 3% 3% 3% 3%2006 2007 2008Adopted Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedActualActualActual 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Revenues:ModifiedProperty taxes - Base levy 3,502,802$ 3,376,307$ 3,363,818$ 3,210,748$ 3,311,255$ 3,472,903$ 3,577,090$ 3,684,402$ 3,794,934$ Property taxes - Special levies 76,145 76,145 76,145 241,822 241,822 241,822 241,822 241,822 241,822 Property taxes - Fire debt levies 64,514 161,327 158,370 158,895 151,743 93,752 94,103 93,572 93,769 Franchise tax 264,032 273,540 283,796 290,625 284,000 292,520 301,296 310,334 319,645 Other taxes 48,237 47,092 47,138 50,000 50,000 51,500 53,045 54,636 56,275 Hotel/motel tax 54,725 52,615 51,263 52,000 51,000 52,530 54,106 55,729 57,401 Licenses and permits 236,135 212,041 193,929 191,470 191,470 197,214 203,131 209,224 215,501 Intergovernmental 304,031 348,800 380,603 825,375 485,817 500,392 515,403 530,865 546,791 Charges for services 43,134 18,576 11,459 26,590 26,590 27,388 28,209 29,056 29,927 Fines & forfeitures 55,948 41,833 38,617 40,800 40,800 42,024 43,285 44,583 45,921 Interest 88,247 118,620 187,181 155,000 104,000 107,120 110,334 113,644 117,053 Miscellaneous 75,846 175,305 189,263 82,802 82,802 85,286 87,845 90,480 93,194 Transfers: DARE Special Revenue Fund - - 4,393 4,393 4,393 - - - - Special Projects Fund - - 90,000 90,000 90,000 - - - - Water Fund 53,735 56,422 58,115 59,859 61,655 63,505 65,410 67,372 69,393 Sewer Fund 42,560 44,688 46,030 47,411 48,833 50,298 51,807 53,361 54,962 Street Light Fund - 2,000 2,060 2,122 2,187 2,253 2,320 2,390 2,461 Levy Reduction 203,785 291,600 329,000 249,315 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Vehicle & Equipment Fund 239,500 141,500 117,250 165,500 167,500 245,000 57,000 204,600 204,600 Use of reserves - - - - - - - - - Total revenues 5,353,375 5,438,411 5,628,430 5,944,727 5,645,867 5,775,506 5,736,204 6,036,071 6,193,651 Operating Expenditures:Legislative Services:City Council 49,618 51,469 49,409 50,369 50,369 51,880 53,436 55,040 56,691 Advisory Commissions 15,175 16,018 22,244 11,900 11,900 12,257 12,625 13,003 13,394 Subtotal 64,793 67,487 71,653 62,269 62,269 64,137 66,061 68,043 70,084 Administrative Services:City Administrator 196,263 178,551 181,283 213,993 223,618 230,327 237,236 244,353 251,684 Elections 31,645 14,408 32,048 14,848 14,848 15,293 15,752 16,225 16,712 Finance 207,316 222,326 232,688 246,510 253,420 261,023 268,853 276,919 285,226 Central Services 299,445 236,211 217,990 218,001 218,001 224,541 231,277 238,216 245,362 Subtotal 734,669 651,496 664,009 693,352 709,887 731,184 753,119 775,713 798,984 Community Development475,378 471,136 459,520 473,645 479,878 494,274 509,103 524,376 540,107 Police1,912,784 2,032,576 2,146,106 2,290,500 2,293,985 2,362,805 2,433,689 2,506,699 2,581,900 Fire220,819 251,119 279,649 285,495 285,495 294,060 302,882 311,968 321,327 Public Works Administration110,865 95,374 113,958 98,977 127,644 131,473 135,418 139,480 143,664 1
Operating Expenditures: (continued)Parks, Recreation & Forestry:Recreation 118,367 122,566 136,343 125,600 125,600 129,368 133,249 137,247 141,364 Parks 263,138 296,693 310,233 314,374 314,374 323,805 333,519 343,525 353,831 Forestry 84,029 62,945 49,675 71,508 71,508 73,653 75,863 78,139 80,483 Subtotal 465,534 482,204 496,251 511,482 511,482 526,826 542,631 558,910 575,677 Public Works Building & Grounds Mtnce 101,161 122,568 138,152 141,298 141,298 145,537 149,903 154,400 159,032 Vehicle & Equipment Mtnce 81,893 81,510 87,695 82,669 82,669 85,149 87,704 90,335 93,045 Subtotal 183,054 204,078 225,847 223,967 223,967 230,686 237,607 244,735 252,077 Streets:Pavement Management 189,530 162,750 202,004 179,863 179,863 185,259 190,817 196,541 202,437 Snow & Ice Control 87,283 119,757 124,272 128,675 128,675 132,535 136,511 140,607 144,825 Sign Maintenance 28,864 34,753 37,262 35,938 35,938 37,016 38,127 39,270 40,449 Subtotal 305,677 317,260 363,538 344,476 344,476 354,810 365,455 376,418 387,711 OtherConvention & Visitor's Bureau 51,989 50,071 48,715 49,400 48,450 49,904 51,401 52,943 54,531 Social Service Coordination 17,405 17,927 18,375 18,926 18,926 19,494 20,079 20,681 21,301 Miscellaneous/contingency 9,475 - 5,402 107,000 106,000 131,000 156,000 156,000 156,000 Transfers to Comm Ctr fund 200,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 160,000 160,000 160,000 160,000 Transfers to Vehicle fund 175,000 175,000 175,000 150,000 150,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 Debt service - Fire Bonds 156,512 203,724 150,625 151,328 148,923 89,288 89,622 89,116 89,304 Subtotal 610,380 621,722 573,117 651,654 647,299 624,685 652,101 653,740 656,136 Capital Expenditures:Administrative 33,278 23,996 24,651 28,300 25,000 25,750 26,523 27,318 28,138 Police 59,380 54,532 89,805 69,600 69,600 90,800 32,800 77,800 77,800 Fire 10,613 32,613 13,048 34,608 34,608 23,646 24,356 25,086 25,839 Park & Recreation 128,357 12,024 5,845 32,000 32,000 - - 84,000 84,000 Public Works 42,856 27,250 13,044 40,900 40,900 130,000 - 17,800 17,800 Subtotal 274,484 150,415 146,393 205,408 202,108 270,196 83,678 232,004 233,577 Total expenditures 5,358,438 5,344,867 5,540,041 5,841,225 5,888,490 6,085,137 6,081,742 6,392,086 6,561,245 Revenue over (under) expenditures(5,062) 93,544 88,389 103,502 (242,623) (309,631) (345,538) (356,015) (367,594) Beginning Fund Balance2,478,226 2,473,164 2,566,708 2,655,097 2,758,599 2,515,976 2,206,344 1,860,806 1,504,791 Ending Fund Balance 2,473,164$ 2,566,708$ 2,655,097$ 2,758,599$ 2,515,976$ 2,206,344$ 1,860,806$ 1,504,791$ 1,137,197$ 2
City of Mounds ViewVehicle and Equipment Replacement FundTarget ActualEstimated Age Replacement Replacement Balance NewVeh. Year Original Replace Replacement In Balance Balance Surplus Remain To Be AnnualDept. Manufacturer Model No. Vin Acq. Cost Year Life Cost 2009 as of 12/09 as of 12/09 (Deficit) Life Funded CostComD FORD Crown Victoria (Police 2003) 508 2FAHP71W04X103085 2008 24,510.67 2013 5 - 1 - - - 4 - - ComD FORD Crown Victoria (Police 2003) 509 2FAHP71W04X158054 2008 22,635.47 2013 5 - 1 - - - 4 - - ComD CHEVY Cavalier 506 1G1JC52F357170189 2004 9,750.00 2014 10 15,000 5 7,500.00 7,500.00 - 5 7,500.00 1,500.00 ComD FORD Ranger Pickup 507 1FTYR10U26PA83660 2006 12,287.50 2016 10 18,000 3 5,400.00 5,400.00 - 7 12,600.00 1,800.00 Total Community Development 3,300.00 Cent Ser Various Computers & switches Various 2008 24,650.78 2013 5 29,000 1 5,800.00 5,800.00 - 4 23,200.00 5,800.00 Cent Ser Various Computers & switches Various 2004 12,082.75 2009 5 25,000 5 25,000.00 25,000.00 - 0 - - Cent Ser Various Computers & switches Various 2005 16,030.90 2010 5 26,000 4 20,800.00 20,800.00 - 1 5,200.00 5,200.00 Cent Ser Various Computers & switches Various 2006 18,004.78 2011 5 27,000 3 16,200.00 16,200.00 - 2 10,800.00 5,400.00 Cent Ser Various Computers & switches Various 2007 23,996.28 2012 5 28,000 2 11,200.00 11,200.00 - 3 16,800.00 5,600.00 Total Central Services 22,000.00 Police FORD Crown Victoria 091 2FAHP71V79X143551 2009 21,852.36 2014 5 30,000 0 - - - 5 30,000.00 6,000.00 Police CHEVY IMPALA (Dep Police Chief) 022 2G1WF52E929320773 2002 18,455.22 2010 8 27,000 7 23,625.00 23,625.00 - 1 3,375.00 3,375.00 Police FORD Crown Victoria (CSO) 051 2FAHP71W25X159949 2005 20,725.50 2013 8 27,000 4 13,500.00 13,500.00 - 4 13,500.00 3,375.00 Police CHEVY IMPALA (Detectives) 061 2G1WB58K569361240 2006 15,507.00 2014 8 28,000 3 10,500.00 10,500.00 - 5 17,500.00 3,500.00 Police FORD Crown Victoria 062 2FAHP71W66X142783 2006 21,437.00 2011 5 30,000 3 18,000.00 18,000.00 - 2 12,000.00 6,000.00 Police FORD Crown Victoria 063 2FAHP71W96X166785 2006 20,600.00 2011 5 30,000 3 18,000.00 18,000.00 - 2 12,000.00 6,000.00 Police CHEVY IMPALA LS (Police Chief) 071 2G1WB58K079377475 2007 19,252.33 2015 8 30,000 2 7,500.00 7,500.00 - 6 22,500.00 3,750.00 Police FORD Crown Victoria 082 2FAFP71V08X175487 2008 23,990.40 2013 5 30,000 1 6,000.00 6,000.00 - 4 24,000.00 6,000.00 Police FORD Crown Victoria 083 2FAFP71V28X175488 2008 26,705.85 2013 5 30,000 1 6,000.00 6,000.00 - 4 24,000.00 6,000.00 Police FORD Crown Victoria 084 2FAHP71V48X168888 2008 26,705.85 2013 5 30,000 1 6,000.00 6,000.00 - 4 24,000.00 6,000.00 Police FORD Crown Victoria 085 2FAHP71V28X168890 2008 26,705.85 2013 5 30,000 1 6,000.00 6,000.00 - 4 24,000.00 6,000.00 Police Civil Defense Siren 2006 15,220.00 2031 25 23,000 3 2,760.00 2,760.00 - 22 20,240.00 920.00 Police Civil Defense Siren 2007 15,593.00 2032 25 23,000 2 1,840.00 1,840.00 - 23 21,160.00 920.00 Police Civil Defense Siren 2008 15,749.00 2033 25 23,000 1 920.00 920.00 - 24 22,080.00 920.00 Total Police 58,760.00 Street KBAR Sign trailer 118 4K1KT4C13PK002148 1993 4,078.00 2018 25 1,800 16 1,152.00 1,152.00 - 9 648.00 72.00 Street REDIHAUL WOLFPAC Trailer 119 47SS121T5K1005396 1989 2,129.75 2014 25 4,800 20 3,840.00 3,840.00 - 5 960.00 192.00 Street CASE 621D Loader 123 JEE0125702 2003 89,800.39 2018 15 130,000 6 52,000.00 52,000.00 - 9 78,000.00 8,666.67 Street STERLING L 8500 (dump truck) 124 2FZAAWAK34AM16187 2003 95,782.84 2018 15 140,000 6 56,000.00 56,000.00 - 9 84,000.00 9,333.33 Street LE ROI Q1-85-DP (roll-pack) 126 3119X372 1980 - 2010 30 15,000 29 14,500.00 14,500.00 - 1 500.00 500.00 Street BOB CAT BCA125 Compactor 127 6814146-4916-11082 2003 14,052.50 2018 15 20,000 6 8,000.00 8,000.00 - 9 12,000.00 1,333.33 Street FORD F150 Pickup 131 1FTEF15N9RLA70851 1994 17,154.69 2009 15 - 15 - - - 0 - - Street FORD L8000 (dump truck) 133 IFDYK82EOTVA31983 1996 96,988.65 2011 15 140,000 13 121,333.33 121,333.33 - 2 18,666.67 9,333.34 Street FORD 4X4 1 TON F578 134 1FDAF57F9XEB96751 1999 36,494.44 2009 10 40,000 10 40,000.00 40,000.00 - 0 - - Street FORD F250 4X4 Pickup 135 1FTNF21L9YEA48779 2000 21,959.00 2010 10 30,000 9 27,000.00 27,000.00 - 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 Street STERLING L 8500 (dump truck) 137 2FZAAWAK34AM16187 2004 95,782.84 2019 15 140,000 5 46,666.67 46,666.67 - 10 93,333.33 9,333.33 Street FORD F150 Pickup 138 1FTRF1458N857852 2004 26,235.15 2014 10 30,000 5 15,000.00 15,000.00 - 5 15,000.00 3,000.00 Street BIG TOW Bobcat trailer 139 4KNUB16284L161539 2004 4,024.25 2029 25 8,000 5 1,600.00 1,600.00 - 20 6,400.00 320.00 Street CHEVY Pickup 3/4 ton 141 1GCGK24R9WZ270376 1998 24,682.50 2009 11 30,000 11 30,000.00 30,000.00 - 0 - - Street FORD F350 Pickup 142 1FDWF3657GED35714 2006 27,012.54 2016 10 36,000 3 10,800.00 10,800.00 - 7 25,200.00 3,600.00 Street SPAULDING RMV Road Saver (Hot Box) 143 T2DRS-07-0205-37 2007 19,191.30 2022 15 19,500 2 2,600.00 2,600.00 - 13 16,900.00 1,300.00 Street REDIHAUL Trailer (tilt bed) 144 47SS121T881023934 2008 3,414.00 2033 25 6,000 1 240.00 240.00 - 24 5,760.00 240.00 Total Streets 50,224.00 Park FORD F250 XLT Pickup 404 1FTNF20LOXEC36753 1999 27,152.78 2009 10 32,000 10 32,000.00 32,000.00 - 0 - - Park FORD F150 XLT Pickup 409 1FTEF15N9SLB70776 1995 16,944.31 2005 10 - 14 - - - -4 - - Park FORD F250 4X4 Pickup 428 1FTNF215X5ED18387 2005 25,723.77 2015 10 36,000 4 14,400.00 14,400.00 - 6 21,600.00 3,600.00 Park JACOBSEN HR9016 mower 440 7052801703 2006 73,297.69 2016 10 90,000 3 27,000.00 27,000.00 - 7 63,000.00 9,000.00 Park WALKER MTGHS mower 441 82973 2006 10,079.82 2016 10 13,500 3 4,050.00 4,050.00 - 7 9,450.00 1,350.00 Park CUSHMAN Turf-Truckster 442 2429053 2007 12,023.85 2022 15 17,000 2 2,266.67 2,266.67 - 13 14,733.33 1,133.33 Park TORO Groundmaster 443 210000348 2002 - 2022 20 - 7 - - - 13 - - Park JACOBSEN Turfcat T628D 444 94671402346 2007 18,277.22 2017 10 24,000 2 4,800.00 4,800.00 - 8 19,200.00 2,400.00 Park EXEL HUSTL 4400 464 004340 1995 17,296.25 NA 10 - 14 - - - 0 - - 3
City of Mounds ViewVehicle and Equipment Replacement FundTarget ActualEstimated Age Replacement Replacement Balance NewVeh. Year Original Replace Replacement In Balance Balance Surplus Remain To Be AnnualDept. Manufacturer Model No. Vin Acq. Cost Year Life Cost 2009 as of 12/09 as of 12/09 (Deficit) Life Funded CostPark AEBI TERRATRAC TT705 465 9098 2003 78,214.25 2013 10 90,000 6 54,000.00 54,000.00 - 4 36,000.00 9,000.00 Park AEBI TERRATRAC TT75 466 14004 2005 74,839.81 2015 10 78,000 4 31,200.00 31,200.00 - 6 46,800.00 7,800.00 Park READY HAUL Tandem trailer 467 475F192T9P1008317 1993 4,078.00 2018 25 7,000 16 4,480.00 4,480.00 - 9 2,520.00 280.00 Park JACOBSEN 084019 471 8401903144 1997 15,550.59 2008 12 13,000 12 13,000.00 13,000.00 - 0 - - Park WALKER MC 426HS 472 409598 1998 6,400.00 2008 11 10,500 11 10,500.00 10,500.00 - 0 - - Park HOW PRICE 180 Aeriator 477 HP-688-EC 1995 47,496.87 NA 15 - 14 - - - 0 - - Park TORO 328D Groundmaster 478 220000234 2002 - 2022 20 - 7 - - - 13 - - Park US CARGO Cargo trailer 479 4X4UTS2103W012414 2003 2,923.00 2028 25 4,200 6 1,008.00 1,008.00 - 19 3,192.00 168.00 Park FORD Sterling/Precision 480 2FZACHDC66AV96438 2005 126,221.86 2020 15 130,000 4 34,666.67 34,666.67 - 11 95,333.33 8,666.67 Park FORD F350 Pickup 481 1FDWF35586ED96586 2006 21,678.60 2016 10 24,000 3 7,200.00 7,200.00 - 7 16,800.00 2,400.00 Total Parks 45,798.00 Total General Fund 180,082.00 Storm STERLING SC-8000/ElginCrosswind 140 49HAADBV06DV11077 2005 126,082.37 2020 15 170,000 4 45,333.33 45,333.33 - 11 124,666.67 11,333.33 Storm CHEVY 3500 Flatbed 122 1GCGK34K0JE197911 1988 12,463.75 2010 22 34,000 21 32,454.55 32,454.55 - 1 1,545.45 1,545.45 Storm Water Fund Total: 12,878.78 Water Interstate Powe Generator Ordered 2008 83,125.61 2033 25 133,000 1 5,320.00 5,320.00 - 24 127,680.00 5,320.00 Water GMC 2500 702 1GCGC24K6NE183394 1992 23,660.48 NA 0 - 17 - - - -17 - - Water CAT 446B Backhoe 703 05BL00672 1995 88,281.05 2010 15 128,000 14 119,466.67 119,466.67 - 1 8,533.33 8,533.33 Water FORD 4X2 3/4 ton 704 1FTNX20L93EA38826 2003 22,421.41 2013 10 28,000 6 16,800.00 16,800.00 - 4 11,200.00 2,800.00 Water ONAN Booster Station 705 J910431288 1990 2010 20 125,000 19 118,750.00 118,750.00 - 1 6,250.00 6,250.00 Water FORD 4X2 3/4 Ton Pickup 706 1FTNF20L32EC81193 2002 25,761.85 2012 10 30,000 7 21,000.00 21,000.00 - 3 9,000.00 3,000.00 Water BOBCAT Hydraulic Frost Breaker 707 A00Y02317 2007 5,888.39 2022 15 6,000 2 800.00 800.00 - 13 5,200.00 400.00 Water Fund Total: 20,583.33 Sewer FORD LT-8000 Vactor 732 1FDZU82E2PVA40009 1993 235,716.85 2010 17 350,000 16 329,411.76 329,411.76 - 1 20,588.24 20,588.24 Sewer FORD F250 4X2 734 1FTNF20L11EA62781 2001 35,500.30 2011 10 30,000 8 24,000.00 24,000.00 - 2 6,000.00 3,000.00 Sewer FORD E350 Televising 735 1FTSS34P44HB43679 2004 122,300.49 2018 15 140,000 5 46,666.67 46,666.67 - 10 93,333.33 9,333.33 Sewer Fund Total: 32,921.57 2,390,632.55 3,093,300 1,643,851.32 1,643,851.32 - 1,449,448.68 246,465.69 4
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
Year Improvement Total Cost Utility Funds Franchise City Bonds
Special
Projects Fund
2009 City Hall Electrical Modifications for Emergency Power $ 50,000 $ 50,000
2009 CR 10 Trail - Segments 1-5
1,275,000
2009 Groveland Park Fence Modifications (Baseball Field Backstop) 10,000
2009 Park Improvement Program
25,000
2009 Security Lighting Impmts. at Greenfield and Groveland Parks 13,000
2009 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area A) 4,440,828 280,000 240,000
2009 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area B&C pre const.) 652,172
2009 Trailway Development Program
104,000 104,000
2009 Trailway Maintenance Program 20,000 20,000
2009 Wellhead Protection Plan
25,000 25,000
Totals $ 6,615,000 $ 305,000 $ 240,000 $ - $ 174,000
2010 Booster Station Building Exterior Brick Wall Tuckpointing $ 40,000 $ 40,000
2010 Booster Station Building Roof Repair 8,500 8,500
2010 Community Center Energy Improvements 65,000 65,000
2010 Community Center Parking Lot Improvements 30,000 30,000
2010 CR 10 / CR H Intersection Improvements (Preconstruction)
100,000
2010 FEMA Study 10,000 10,000
2010 GPS Equipment Procurement (for Utility Locates) & Mapping 10,000 10,000
2010 Groveland & Hillview Park Drainage & Irrigation Improvements 25,000
2010 Groveland Wastewater Lift Station Wet Well Rehabilitation 27,500 27,500
2010 New Lambert Park Building (Preconstruction)
30,000 15,000
2010 Park Improvement Program (CH Playground Media Imp.) 25,000
2010 Police Department Parking Lot Improvements 50,000
2010 Public Works Facility Environmental Improvements 120,000 120,000
2010 Reservoir Building Exterior Brick Wall Tuckpointing & Repairs 100,000 100,000
2010 Reservoir Building Landscaping Improvements 2,500 2,500
2010 Reservoir Building Roof Repair 60,000 60,000
2010 Slip Lining Improvements 100,000 100,000
2010 Stormwater Management Improvements - Subdistrict EW-4 25,000 25,000
2010 Stormwater Management Improvements - Subdistrict SC-1
3,000 3,000
2010 Stormwater Management Improvements - Subdistrict SC-3 20,000 20,000
2010 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area B/C) 3,692,642 280,000 240,000
2010 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area D pre const.) 368,211 -
2010 Street Sweeping Disposal 10,000 10,000
2010 Trailway Development Program 104,000 104,000
2010 Trailway Maintenance Program 40,000 40,000
2010 Water Tower Rehabilitation
800,000 800,000
2010 Well No. 1 & No. 2 Pump Rehabilitation 60,000 60,000
2010 Well No. 2 Building Exterior Improvements 9,000 9,000
2010 Well No. 2 Fuel Source Conversion 100,000 100,000
2010 WTP No. 1 Exterior Wall Repainting 5,500 5,500
2010 WTP No. 1/Well No. 5 Building Gutter Downspout Replacement 1,500 1,500
2010 WTP No. 1/Well No. 5 Building Interior Panel Repairs 3,700 3,700
2010 WTP No. 3 Building Interior Panel Repairs 3,000 3,000
Totals $ 6,049,053 $ 1,679,200 $ 240,000 $ - $ 374,000
5
Park
Dedication
Fund MSAS
Street
Improvement
Fund
Federal
Funds
DNR Trail
Grants City TIF
Mn/DOT
Co-Op
Agreement
Ramsey
County
CSAH
CR 10
Turnback
Funds
Other Local
Funds
525,000 750,000
8,200 1,800
25,000
13,000
260,000 3,660,828
652,172
$ 46,200 $ 260,000 $ - $ 525,000 $ - $ 5,063,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,800
100,000
25,000
15,000
25,000
50,000
365,000 2,411,340 396,302
368,211
$ 65,000 $ 365,000 $ 2,411,340 $ - $ - $ 864,513 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000
6
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
Year Improvement Total Cost Utility Funds Franchise City Bonds
Special
Projects Fund
2011 Access Lane to Hidden Hollow Sanitary Sewerline $ 10,000 $ 10,000
2011 City Hall Irrigation System 13,000 13,000
2011 City Hall Landscaping 18,000 18,000
2011 City Hall Roof Replacement 50,000 50,000
2011 CR 10 / CR H Intersection Improvements (Construction) 1,500,000
2011 CR 10 Gateway Features 316,000
2011 CR 10 Median Enhancements 350,000
2011 Mustang Drive Improvements (Pavement & Stormwater) 400,000 50,000
2011 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area D) 2,086,532 280,000 240,000
2011 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area E)(pre const.) 625,456
2011 Edgewood Drive Concrete Boulevard Improvements 30,000 30,000
2011 Fire Truck Procurement (2 Trucks)
250,000 250,000
2011 Greenfield Park Trail Bridges 40,000
2011 New Lambert Park Building (Construction) 260,000 130,000
2011 Park Improvement Program
25,000
2011 Portable Emergency Generator Procurement 100,000 60,000 40,000
2011 Slip Lining Improvements 100,000 100,000
2011 Traffic Counter System Procurement 7,000
2011 Trailway Development Program 104,000 104,000
2011 Trailway Maintenance Program
20,000 20,000
Totals $ 6,304,988 $ 500,000 $ 240,000 $ 250,000 $ 405,000
2012 CR 10 / Woodale Dr Intersection Improvements $ 400,000
2012 Park Improvement Program 25,000
2012 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area E) 3,544,253 250,000 240,000
2012 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area F)(pre const.) 474,027
2012 Trailway Development Program 104,000 104,000
2012 Trailway Maintenance Program 20,000 20,000
2012 Well No. 3 & No. 5 Pump Rehabilitation 60,000 60,000
Totals $ 4,627,280 $ 310,000 $ 240,000 $ - $ 124,000
2013 CR 10 / CR I Intersection Improvements $ 500,000
2013 CR 10 / Silver Lake Rd Intersection Improvements 400,000
2013 CR 10 Trail - Segment 11 150,000
2013 CR 10 Trail - Segment 6 600,000
2013 Park Improvement Program 25,000
2013 Parking Lot Rehabilitation at Greenfield Park 50,000
2013 Stormwater Management Improvements - Subdistrict NW-1 22,500 22,500
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area F) 2,686,150 250,000 240,000
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area G)(pre const.) 290,310
2013 Trailway Development Program 104,000 104,000
2013 Trailway Maintenance Program 20,000 20,000
Totals $ 4,847,960 $ 272,500 $ 240,000 $ - $ 124,000
7
Park
Dedication
Fund MSAS
Street
Improvement
Fund
Federal
Funds
DNR Trail
Grants City TIF
Mn/DOT
Co-Op
Agreement
Ramsey
County
CSAH
CR 10
Turnback
Funds
Other Local
Funds
630,000 375,000 300,000 70,000 125,000
316,000
350,000
262,500 87,500
88,687 1,477,845
625,456
40,000
130,000
25,000
7,000
$ 195,000 $ 88,687 $ 262,500 $ 630,000 $ - $ 3,144,301 $ 300,000 $ 70,000 $ 125,000 $ 94,500
$ 113,000 $ 287,000
25,000
291,000 1,837,280 525,973 400,000
474,027
$ 25,000 $ 291,000 $ 1,837,280 $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ 113,000 $ 687,000
$ 113,000 $ 387,000
120,000 12,000 268,000
150,000
50,000 200,000 350,000
25,000
50,000
291,000 1,045,460 459,690 400,000
290,310
$ 75,000 $ 291,000 $ 1,045,460 $ - $ 50,000 $ 1,100,000 $ - $ 120,000 $ 125,000 $ 1,405,000
8
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
Year Improvement Total Cost Utility Funds Franchise City Bonds
Special
Projects Fund
2014 City Hall Monument Sign $ 12,000 $ 12,000
2014 CR 10 / CR H2 Intersection Improvements 500,000
2014 CR 10 / Groveland Rd. Intersection Improvements 250,000
2014 CR 10 / Spring Lake Road Intersection 250,000
2014 CR 10 Gateway Entry Features (NW End) 165,000
2014 CR 10 Gateway Entry Features (SE End) 300,000
2014 CR 10 Gateway Features 105,600
2014 CR 10 Trail - Segment 7 307,000
2014 CR 10 Trail - Segment 8 284,100
2014 Exterior Shell Improvements for Random Park Building 20,000
2014 Irrigation System Construction at Random Park 15,000
2014 Park Improvement Program 25,000
2014 Stormwater Management Improvements - Subdistrict GF-5 15,000 15,000
2014 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area G) 1,645,091 250,000 240,000
2014 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area H)(pre const.) 371,656
2014 Street Pavement Management - Mill/Overlay 350,000
2014 Street Pavement Management - Seal Coat 350,000
2014 Trailway Development Program 104,000 104,000
2014 Trailway Maintenance Program
20,000 20,000
Totals $ 5,089,447 $ 265,000 $ 240,000 $ - $ 136,000
2015 CR 10 / Edgewood Intersection Improvements $ 250,000
2015 CR 10 / Long Lake Rd Intersection Improvements 600,000
2015 Park Improvement Program 25,000
2015 Reservoir Building New Built-up Roof System 160,000 160,000
2015 Stormwater Management Improvements - Subdistrict AA-4 3,000 3,000
2015 Stormwater Management Improvements - Subdistrict AA-5 511,000 511,000
2015 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area H) 2,106,049 250,000 240,000
2015 Trailway Maintenance Program 20,000 20,000
2015 Well No. 6 Pump Rehabilitation 30,000 30,000
2015 WTP No. 1 ADA Compliant Restrooms Improvements 6,500 6,500
2015 WTP No. 1 Building Roof Replacement 37,500 37,500
2015 WTP No. 1/Well No. 5 Building Exterior Brick Wall Tuckpointing 35,000 35,000
2015 WTP No. 3 Building Exterior Brick Wall Tuckpointing 35,000 35,000
Totals $ 3,819,049 $ 1,068,000 $ 240,000 $ - $ 20,000
2016 Park Improvement Program
$ 25,000
2016 Stormwater Management Improvements - Subdistrict AA-3 5,000 5,000
2016 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area I)(pre const.) 522,966 250,000 240,000
2016 Street Pavement Management - Seal Coat (Area A) 100,000
2016 Trailway Maintenance Program 20,000 20,000
Totals $ 672,966 $ 255,000 $ 240,000 $ - $ 20,000
2017 Municipal Impound Lot $ 30,000
2017 New Public Works Facility (Preconstruction)
150,000 150,000
2017 Park Improvement Program
25,000
2017 Stormwater Management Improvements - Subdistrict GF-6 21,000 21,000
2016 Street and Utility Improvement Program (Area I) 2,963,472 250,000 240,000
2017 Street Pavement Management - Seal Coat (Area B/C) 85,000
2017 Trailway Maintenance Program
20,000 20,000
Totals $ 3,294,472 $ 271,000 $ 240,000 $ 150,000 $ 20,000
2018 New Public Works Facility (Construction) $ 2,850,000 $ 2,850,000
2018 Stormwater Maintenance Program 60,000 60,000
2018 Stormwater Management Improvements - Subdistrict EW-2/3 25,000 25,000
2018 Street Pavement Management - Seal Coat (Area D) 50,000
2018 Wastewater Collection Maintenance Program 60,000 60,000
2018 Water Maintenance Program 180,000 180,000
Totals $ 3,225,000 $ 325,000 $ - $ 2,850,000 $ -
Grand Total $ 44,545,215 $ 5,250,700 $ 2,160,000 $ 3,250,000 $ 1,397,000
9
Park
Dedication
Fund MSAS
Street
Improvement
Fund
Federal
Funds
DNR Trail
Grants City TIF
Mn/DOT
Co-Op
Agreement
Ramsey
County
CSAH
CR 10
Turnback
Funds
Other Local
Funds
113,000 387,000
250,000
250,000
165,000
300,000
105,600
150,000 157,000
150,000 134,100
20,000
15,000
25,000
291,000 274,091 590,000
371,656
350,000
350,000
$ 60,000 $ 291,000 $ 1,345,747 $ 300,000 $ - $ 456,100 $ - $ - $ 113,000 $ 1,882,600
$ 250,000
108,000 12,000 480,000
25,000
291,000 735,049 590,000
$ 25,000 $ 291,000 $ 735,049 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 108,000 $ 12,000 $ 1,320,000
$ 25,000
291,000 (848,034) 590,000
100,000
$ 25,000 $ 291,000 $ (748,034) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 590,000
$ 30,000
25,000
291,000 1,592,472 590,000
85,000
$ 25,000 $ 291,000 $ 1,677,472 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 620,000
50,000
$ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ 541,200 $ 2,459,687 $ 8,616,814 $ 1,455,000 $ 50,000 $ 11,627,914 $ 300,000 $ 298,000 $ 488,000 $ 6,650,900
10
City of Mounds View
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 thru 2014
Impact on Capital Projects Funds' Cash Balances
Special Street Park Community
Projects Improvement Dedication Fund Total
Cash balance, Dec. 31, 2008 1,400,461 2,893,123 890,868 2,628,616 7,813,068
2009 Revenues:
Taxes & franchise fees 240,000 240,000
Tax increment 5,063,000 5,063,000
Special assessments -
Intergovernmental:
State 1,349,531 1,349,531
Federal 525,000 525,000
County -
Miscellaneous:
Investment income 35,012 72,328 22,272 65,715 195,327
Developer payments 6,000 6,000
Proceeds from bond sale -
Total revenue 35,012 7,249,859 28,272 65,715 7,378,858
Available Resources 1,435,473 10,142,982 919,140 2,694,331 15,191,926
2009 Expenditures:
General Government -
Government buildings 50,000 50,000
Public safety -
Streets and highways 4,813,000 4,813,000
Sidewalks & trails 124,000 1,275,000 1,399,000
Parks & recreation 46,200 46,200
Operating transfers out -
Total expenditures 174,000 6,088,000 46,200 - 6,308,200
Surplus of revenues
over (under) expenditures (138,988) 1,161,859 (17,928) 65,715 1,070,658
Cash balance, Dec. 31, 2009 1,261,473$ 4,054,982$ 872,940$ 2,694,331$ 8,883,726$
11
City of Mounds View
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 thru 2014
Impact on Capital Projects Funds' Cash Balances
Special Street Park Community
Projects Improvement Dedication Fund Total
Cash balance, Dec. 31, 2009 1,261,473$ 4,054,982$ 872,940$ 2,694,331$ 8,883,726$
2010 Revenues:
Taxes 240,000 240,000
Tax increment 864,513 864,513
Special assessments -
Intergovernmental:
State 365,000 365,000
Federal -
County -
Miscellaneous:
Investment income 28,383 91,237 19,641 60,622 199,884
Developer payments 6,000 6,000
Proceeds from bond sale -
Total revenue 28,383 1,560,750 25,641 60,622 1,675,397
Available Resources 1,289,856 5,615,732 898,581 2,754,954 10,559,123
2010 Expenditures:
General government -
Government buildings -
Streets and highways 120,000 3,790,853 3,910,853
Sidewalks & trails 124,000 124,000
Parks & recreation 110,000 65,000 175,000
Operating transfers out -
Total expenditures 354,000 3,790,853 65,000 - 4,209,853
Surplus of revenues
over (under) expenditures (325,617) (2,230,103) (39,359) 60,622 (2,534,456)
Cash balance, Dec. 31, 2010 935,856$ 1,824,879$ 833,581$ 2,754,954$ 6,349,270$
12
City of Mounds View
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 thru 2014
Impact on Capital Projects Funds' Cash Balances
Special Street Park Community
Projects Improvement Dedication Fund Total
Cash balance, Dec. 31, 2010 935,856$ 1,824,879$ 833,581$ 2,754,954$ 6,349,270$
2011 Revenues:
Taxes 240,000 240,000
Tax increment 3,144,301 3,144,301
Special assessments 87,500 87,500
Intergovernmental:
State 700,000 700,000
Federal 630,000 630,000
County 195,000 195,000
Miscellaneous:
Investment income 28,076 54,746 25,007 82,649 190,478
Developer payments 6,000 6,000
Proceeds from bond sale -
Total revenue 28,076 5,051,547 31,007 82,649 5,193,279
Available Resources 963,931 6,876,427 864,588 2,837,602 11,542,549
2011 Expenditures:
Government buildings 81,000 81,000
Streets and highways 40,000 4,947,988 4,987,988
Sidewalks & trails 124,000 124,000
Parks & recreation 160,000 195,000 355,000
Operating transfers out -
Total expenditures 405,000 4,947,988 195,000 - 5,547,988
Surplus of revenues
over (under) expenditures (376,924) 103,559 (163,993) 82,649 (354,709)
Cash balance, Dec. 31, 2011 558,931$ 1,928,439$ 669,588$ 2,837,602$ 5,994,561$
13
City of Mounds View
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 thru 2014
Impact on Capital Projects Funds' Cash Balances
Special Street Park Community
Projects Improvement Dedication Fund Total
Cash balance, Dec. 31, 2011 558,931$ 1,928,439$ 669,588$ 2,837,602$ 5,994,561$
2012 Revenues:
Taxes 640,000 640,000
Tax increment 1,000,000 1,000,000
Special assessments -
Intergovernmental:
State 400,000 400,000
Federal -
County 113,000 113,000
Miscellaneous:
Investment income 16,768 57,853 20,088 85,128 179,837
Developer payments 6,000 6,000
Operating transfer in 300,000 300,000
Total revenue 16,768 2,510,853 26,088 85,128 2,638,837
Available Resources 575,699 4,439,292 695,676 2,922,731 8,633,397
2012 Expenditures:
Government buildings -
Public safety -
Streets and highways 4,168,280 4,168,280
Sidewalks & trails 124,000 124,000
Parks & recreation 25,000 25,000
Operating transfers out 300,000 300,000
Total expenditures 124,000 4,168,280 25,000 300,000 4,617,280
Surplus of revenues
over (under) expenditures (107,232) (1,657,427) 1,088 (214,872) (1,978,443)
Cash balance, Dec. 31, 2012 451,699$ 271,012$ 670,676$ 2,622,731$ 4,016,117$
14
City of Mounds View
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 thru 2014
Impact on Capital Projects Funds' Cash Balances
Special Street Park Community
Projects Improvement Dedication Fund Total
Cash balance, Dec. 31, 2012 451,699$ 271,012$ 670,676$ 2,622,731$ 4,016,117$
2013 Revenues:
Taxes 640,000 640,000
Tax increment 900,000 900,000
Special assessments -
Intergovernmental:
State 415,000 415,000
Federal 640,000 640,000
County 245,000 245,000
Miscellaneous:
Investment income 13,551 8,130 20,120 78,682 120,484
Developer payments 6,000 6,000
Proceeds from bond sale 1,005,000 1,005,000
Operating transfer in 1,100,000
Total revenue 13,551 4,953,130 26,120 78,682 3,971,484
Available Resources 465,250 5,224,142 696,796 2,701,412 7,987,601
2013 Expenditures:
Government buildings -
Public safety -
Streets and highways 3,876,460 3,876,460
Sidewalks & trails 124,000 800,000 924,000
Parks & recreation 75,000 75,000
Operating transfers out 1,100,000 1,100,000
Total expenditures 124,000 4,676,460 75,000 1,100,000 5,975,460
Surplus of revenues
over (under) expenditures (110,449) 276,670 (48,880) (1,021,318) (2,003,976)
Cash balance, Dec. 31, 2013 341,250$ 547,682$ 621,796$ 1,601,412$ 2,012,141$
15
City of Mounds View
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 thru 2014
Impact on Capital Projects Funds' Cash Balances
Special Street Park Community
Projects Improvement Dedication Fund Total
Cash balance, Dec. 31, 2013 341,250$ 547,682$ 621,796$ 1,601,412$ 2,012,141$
2014 Revenues:
Taxes 830,000 830,000
Tax increment -
Special assessments -
Intergovernmental:
State 423,000 423,000
Federal 472,800 472,800
County 113,000 113,000
Miscellaneous:
Investment income 10,238 16,430 18,654 48,042 93,364
Developer payments 6,000 6,000
Operating transfer in 800,000 800,000
Total revenue 10,238 2,655,230 24,654 48,042 2,738,164
Available Resources 351,488 3,202,913 646,450 1,649,455 4,750,305
2014 Expenditures:
Government buildings 12,000 12,000
Public safety -
Streets and highways 2,466,747 2,466,747
Sidewalks & trails 124,000 591,000 715,000
Parks & recreation 60,000 60,000
Operating transfers out 800,000 800,000
Total expenditures 136,000 3,057,747 60,000 800,000 4,053,747
Surplus of revenues
over (under) expenditures (125,762) (402,517) (35,346) (751,958) (1,315,583)
Cash balance, Dec. 31, 2014 215,488$ 145,166$ 586,450$ 849,455$ 696,558$
16
City of Mounds ViewWater Utility 2009 Rate Study0% 3% 3% 3% 3%ActualActualActual Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014ExpensesPersonnel services 209,350$ 284,860$ 272,944$ 306,777$ 308,311$ 309,852$ 319,148$ 328,722$ 338,584$ Supplies & materials 38,549 40,308 54,186 62,928 62,928 64,816 66,760 68,763 70,826 Contractual services 129,429 173,169 153,371 288,948 288,948 297,616 306,545 315,741 325,214 Rehabilitate wells & tanks - - - - 60,000 - 60,000 - - Water service line repairs 51,991 39,935 55,824 45,000 45,000 46,350 47,741 49,173 50,648 Depreciation 230,125 208,320 209,839 220,000 223,000 225,000 240,000 245,000 245,000 Debt service - interest 46,941 42,349 37,431 34,475 28,070 21,375 14,305 6,675 - Transfers to other funds 73,735 76,422 108,115 79,859 81,655 85,503 85,409 87,371 89,392 Contingency- - - 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Total Expenses780,120 865,363 891,710 1,052,987 1,112,912 1,065,513 1,154,908 1,116,446 1,134,664 RevenuesMetered water sales 736,624 710,279 734,709 764,717 793,730 840,420 887,110 933,800 980,490 Meter charge 39,267 44,305 1,859 - - - - - - Water tower space rental 68,940 55,480 60,390 60,007 65,407 68,024 70,745 73,574 76,517 Water service line repair fee 46,977 47,310 47,587 51,500 51,500 51,500 51,500 51,500 51,500 Investment income 68,238 107,137 72,980 46,875 29,054 2,162 (3,990) (10,323) (14,503) Miscellaneous revenues 585,976 4,906 5,964 3,250 3,250 3,348 3,448 3,551 3,658 Transfers from vehicle fund - - - - 253,000 - 30,000 28,000 - Total Revenues1,546,022 969,417 923,489 926,349 1,195,942 965,453 1,038,812 1,080,103 1,097,662 Net Income 765,902 104,054 31,779 (126,638) 83,030 (100,060) (116,095) (36,343) (37,002) Net assets - begining of year 3,702,066 4,467,968 4,572,022 4,603,801 4,477,163 4,560,193 4,460,133 4,344,037 4,307,694 Net assets - end of year4,467,968$ 4,572,022$ 4,603,801$ 4,477,163$ 4,560,193$ 4,460,133$ 4,344,037$ 4,307,694$ 4,270,693$ Cash flowsDeduct:Capital outlays - equipment 18,649$ 28,644$ 341,323$ 38,000$ 253,000$ -$ 30,000$ 28,000$ -$ Construction - - 17,530 90,000 1,228,700 120,000 90,000 90,000 180,000 Debt service - principal 180,000 185,000 190,000 200,000 205,000 210,000 215,000 230,000 - Add back:Depreciation 230,125 208,320 209,839 220,000 223,000 225,000 240,000 245,000 245,000 Change in receivables/payables(92,689) 15,473 (7,378) - - - - - - Cash - Beginning of Year1,183,083 1,887,772 2,001,975 1,687,362 1,452,724 72,054 (133,006) (344,101) (483,444) Cash - End of Year1,887,772$ 2,001,975$ 1,687,362$ 1,452,724$ 72,054$ (133,006)$ (344,101)$ (483,444)$ (455,446)$ Water rate per 1,000 gallons used 1.50$ 1.50$ 1.55$ 1.60$ 1.70$ 1.80$ 1.90$ 2.00$ 2.10$ Annual based on 20,000 gal. per quarter120.00 120.00 124.00 128.00 136.00 144.00 152.00 160.00 168.00 17
City of Mounds ViewSewer Utility 2009 Rate Study0% 3% 3% 3% 3%ActualActualActual Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014ExpensePersonnel services 229,442$ 237,048$ 219,075$ 282,630$ 282,630$ 284,043$ 292,564$ 301,341$ 310,382$ Supplies & materials 12,516 19,793 13,126 22,588 22,588 23,266 23,964 24,683 25,423 Contractual services 56,525 62,738 96,484 182,667 182,667 188,147 193,791 199,605 205,593 MCES disposal charges 638,631 637,078 696,031 733,120 740,451 762,665 785,545 809,111 833,384 Depreciation 166,369 153,063 153,931 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 Transfers to other funds 78,560 80,688 142,030 83,411 84,832 86,297 87,806 89,361 90,962 Contingency- - - - - - - - - Total Expenses1,182,043 1,190,408 1,320,677 1,469,416 1,478,168 1,509,418 1,548,670 1,589,101 1,630,744 RevenuesSanitary sewer service 1,091,937 1,038,677 1,113,907 1,115,828 1,118,324 1,140,690 1,174,911 1,210,159 1,246,463 Contractual wastewater36,219 30,391 12,891 17,000 - - - - - Service availability charges 104,000 (3,251) 7,405 4,000 4,000 4,120 4,120 4,120 4,120 Investment income 147,868 187,916 149,549 108,750 64,246 85,086 74,166 65,768 56,963 Miscellaneous revenues 490,064 579 1,789 500 500 515 530 546 563 Capital contributions 29,027 - - - - - - - - Transfers from vehicle fund - - - - 350,000 30,000 - - - Total Revenues1,899,115 1,254,312 1,285,541 1,246,078 1,537,070 1,260,412 1,253,728 1,280,593 1,308,109 Net Income 717,072 63,904 (35,136) (223,338) 58,902 (249,006) (294,942) (308,508) (322,636) Net assets - beginning of year4,968,201 5,685,273 5,749,177 5,714,041 5,490,703 5,549,605 5,300,599 5,005,657 4,697,149 Net assets - end of year5,685,273 5,749,177 5,714,041 5,490,703 5,549,605 5,300,599 5,005,657 4,697,149 4,374,513 Cash FlowsNet Income717,072 63,904 (35,136) (223,338) 58,902 (249,006) (294,942) (308,508) (322,636) Deduct:Capital outlays - equipment (2,516) (37,455) (4,758) (10,000) (450,000) (130,000) - - - Construction (500,219) - - (150,000) (150,000) (150,000) (150,000) (150,000) (150,000) Add back:Depreciation 166,369 153,063 153,931 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 Change in receivables/payables4,787 27,514 (48,527) - - - - - - Cash - Beginning of Year2,772,617 3,158,110 3,365,136 3,430,646 3,212,308 2,836,210 2,472,204 2,192,262 1,898,753 Cash - End of Year3,158,110$ 3,365,136$ 3,430,646$ 3,212,308$ 2,836,210$ 2,472,204$ 2,192,262$ 1,898,753$ 1,591,118$ Residential equivalent connection rate 47.00$ 47.00$ 53.00$ 53.00$ 54.06$ 55.14$ 56.80$ 58.50$ 60.25$ Residential fixed rate 21.58 21.58 21.58 21.58 22.01 22.45 23.13 23.82 24.53 Residential variable rate 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.75 1.79 1.84 1.90 1.96 Annual based on 20,000 gal. per quarter223.92 223.92 223.92 223.92 228.40 232.97 239.96 247.15 254.57 Contractual rate 2.4932 2.4932 2.4932 2.4932 2.4932 2.4932 2.4932 2.4932 2.4932 Contractual useage per month 1,211 1,015 431 570 - - - - - 18
City of Mounds ViewStorm Water Utility 2009 Rate Study0% 3% 3% 3% 3%ActualActualActual Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014ExpensesPersonnel services 67,447 78,929 85,715 83,251 83,667 83,709 86,220 88,807 91,471 Supplies & materials 7,727 2,827 9,905 13,526 13,526 13,932 14,350 14,780 15,224 Contractual services 61,836 24,200 69,456 94,140 94,140 96,964 99,873 102,869 105,955 Feasibility reports - - - - - - - - - Update FEMA flood ins. study - - - - 10,000 - - - - Depreciation 34,841 34,337 31,878 35,000 35,000 36,000 37,000 38,000 39,000 Transfers to vehicle fund 6,000 6,000 16,000 16,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 Total Expenses177,851 146,293 212,954 241,917 250,333 244,605 251,443 258,457 265,650 RevenuesStorm water service fee 216,496 208,411 224,391 225,669 268,046 294,851 294,851 294,851 308,253 Intergovernmental revenue - - - - - - - - - Investment income 45,845 67,448 57,985 34,000 21,375 31,346 32,173 34,351 35,738 Capital contributions - - - - - - - - - Transfers from vehicle fund 30,000 - - - 34,000 - - - - Total Revenues292,341 275,859 282,376 259,669 323,421 326,196 327,024 329,202 343,991 Net Income 114,490 129,566 69,422 17,752 73,088 81,591 75,581 70,745 78,341 Net assets - beginning of year2,398,552 2,513,042 2,642,608 2,712,030 2,729,782 2,802,870 2,884,462 2,960,042 3,030,787 Net assets - end of year2,513,042 2,642,608 2,712,030 2,729,782 2,802,870 2,884,462 2,960,042 3,030,787 3,109,128 Cash Flows Net Income114,490$ 129,566$ 69,422$ 17,752$ 73,088$ 81,591$ 75,581$ 70,745$ 78,341$ Deduct:Capital outlays - equipment - - - - (34,000) - - - - Construction - - - (355,000) (98,000) (90,000) (40,000) (62,500) (55,000) Add back:Depreciation 34,841 34,337 31,878 35,000 35,000 36,000 37,000 38,000 39,000 Change in receivables/payables(1,065) 2,575 38,045 - - - - - - Cash - begining of Year916,921 1,065,187 1,231,665 1,371,010 1,068,762 1,044,850 1,072,442 1,145,022 1,191,267 Cash - end of year1,065,187$ 1,231,665$ 1,371,010$ 1,068,762$ 1,044,850$ 1,072,442$ 1,145,022$ 1,191,267$ 1,253,608$ Quarterly residential service fee7.50$ 7.50$ 8.25$ 9.00$ 10.00$ 11.00$ 11.00$ 11.00$ 11.50$ Annual fee30.00 30.00 33.00 36.00 40.00 44.00 44.00 44.00 46.00 19
City of Mounds ViewStreet Light Utility 2009 Rate Study0% 3% 3% 3% 3%ActualActualActual Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014ExpensesPersonnel services 3,270$ 3,254$ 3,473$ 3,718$ 3,737$ 3,755$ 3,868$ 3,984$ 4,103$ Contractual services 52,907 63,982 66,862 65,900 65,900 67,877 69,913 72,011 74,171 Transfer to other funds - 2,000 2,060 2,122 2,186 2,251 2,319 2,388 2,460 Total Expenses56,177 69,236 72,395 71,740 71,822 73,884 76,100 78,383 80,734 RevenuesStreet light service fee 75,480 75,619 77,865 72,000 73,262 73,262 73,262 73,262 76,643 Investment income 4,697 7,399 6,222 2,000 2,719 4,204 4,311 4,356 4,333 Miscellaneous revenues 381 - - - - - - - Transfers from other funds - - - - - - - - Total Revenues80,559 83,018 84,087 74,000 75,981 77,465 77,573 77,617 80,975 Net Income 24,381 13,782 11,692 2,260 4,159 3,582 1,473 (766) 241 Net assets - begining of year 109,380 133,761 147,543 159,235 161,495 165,654 169,236 170,709 169,943 Net assets - end of year133,761$ 147,543$ 159,235$ 161,495$ 165,654$ 169,236$ 170,709$ 169,943$ 170,184$ Cash flows Net Income24,381$ 13,782$ 11,692$ 2,260$ 4,159$ 3,582$ 1,473$ (766)$ 241$ Deduct:Capital outlays - equipment - - - - - - - - Add back:Change in receivables/payables(3,394) 3,614 (726) - - - - - - Cash - Beginning of Year95,331 116,318 133,714 133,714 135,974 140,133 143,715 145,188 144,422 Cash - End of Year116,318$ 133,714$ 144,680$ 135,974$ 140,133$ 143,715$ 145,188$ 144,422$ 144,663$ Quarterly residential service fee3.25$ 3.25$ 3.25$ 3.25$ 3.25$ 3.25$ 3.25$ 3.25$ 3.40$ Annual fee13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.60$ 20
Item No: 8
Meeting Date: July 9, 2009
Type of Business: Work Session
Administrator Review: ____
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: James Ericson, Clerk - Administrator
Item Title/Subject: Discuss Potential Projects to Receive Funding Through
Bethlehem Baptist Church Donation
Background
Bethlehem Baptist Church purchased the building located at 5151 Program Avenue in
2004 and received City zoning approval to renovate the former office / warehouse
space for church usage. At this same time, the Church expressed its desire to sponsor
and support worthy community endeavors and thus created the Mounds View Service
Project Fund pledging annual donations totaling $25,000. According to the Church,
they envisioned the fund to be used to help meet certain community needs jointly
identified by the city and the Church that would be “in harmony” with their mission and
values.
Discussion
The Church made a donation in the amount of $16,561 earlier this year which the
Council accepted on April 13. Representatives from the City, the Community Center
and the Park & Rec Commission will be meeting with representatives from Bethlehem
later this month on July 29 to discuss possible projects for funding with their second half
donation. Prior to having this meeting, I wanted to have the City Council consider
potential projects for funding and have asked the Park and Recreation Commission to
do the same thing. (The Parks, Recreation and Forestry Commission will be meeting
on July 23rd.) Below is a partial list of projects and programs which have benefitted from
BBC donations in the past:
• Trailway project (benches, lighting, landscaping)
• Backstop & Fence at Silverview Park
• Landscaping around the Co. Rd 10 gateway signs
• YMCA’s Y-Partners program
• YMCA’s Club Mid program
• MVCC Audio / Video needs
• Miscellaneous park improvements
• Festival in the Park
• Mounds View School District’s SAIL and STAND programs
• DARE program,
• Irondale High School athletics
• Community Emergency Assistance Program
• Economic Development activities
BBC Report
July 6, 2009
Page 2
Recommendation:
Discuss potential programs and projects that could be suggested for funding through
their Bethlehem Baptist Church “Mounds View Service project Fund” donation program.
Your list of suggestions will be presented at the meeting on July 29, 2009.
Respectfully submitted,
James Ericson
Clerk-Administrator