Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1993/09/13 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 7:00 P.M. AGENDA The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by staff and appointed commissions, committees and boards. Decisions are based on this information, as well as City policy and practices, input from constituents and a Councilmember's personal judgement. If you have comments, questions or information regarding an item on the agenda, please step forward to be recognized by the Mayor during the "Residents Requests and Comments From the Floor" item on the agenda. Please state your name and address for the record. All comments are appreciated. A copy of all printed materials relating to the agenda item is available for public inspection at the Recording Secretary's Table. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. OATH OF OFFICE Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, to Administer Oath of Office to Councilmember-Elect, Julie Trude. WELCOME ABOARD, JULIE, m 4. ROLL CALL - Linke Quick Wuori Trude Blanchard 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 25, 1993 Canvassing Board Meeting COUNCIL ACTION: A T D AGENDA PAGE TWO SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 August 23, 1993 Regular Meeting COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: Special "Salute to Youth" Award to Tri-City Red Baseball Team (Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator) 7. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Consideration of Resolution No. 4417 Approving an Interfund Budget Transfer, Staff Report No. 93-621C (Carla Asleson, Recycling Coordinator) B. Adopt Resolution No. 4416 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds C. Award Bid to Bacon's Electric for $2,900.00 to be Transferred from Contingency Account No. 100-4500-910 to Account No. 100-4190- 121, Staff Report No. 93-614C,, (Mike Ulrich,-Public Works Supervisor) D. Set Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m., September 27, 1993, to Consider Request for Conditional Use Permit (oversized accessory building), Donald Pederson, 8368 Spring Lake Road, Planning Case No. 368-93 E. Set Public Hearing for 7:10 p.m., September 27, 1993, to Consider Request for Conditional Use Permit (car wash), Gateway Foods, 2390 Highway 10, Planning Case No. 362-93 F. Consideration of Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement for the Fire Training Association, Staff Report No. 93-620C AGENDA PAGE THREE SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 G. Licenses for Approval Sewer and Water - Expires 6/30/94 Gertman Mechanical - New HVAC - Expires 6/30/94 Dean's Heating and Air Conditioning - New Roofing Expires 6/30/94 Dan Kenton Roofing - New COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 8. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR Citizens' comments are encouraged to allow individual citizens to address the Council, as a whole, on a matter of interest or concern to the citizens. The preservation of the Citizens' Comments item on the agenda is important in order to encourage and maintain this information flow. To preserve and protect this valuable communications link, a speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. 7:05 p.m. Continuation of Public Hearing to Consider Request for Conditional Use Permit to Allow The Continued Use of a Temporary Structure at 7901 Red Oak Drive, Planning Case No. 366-93, Staff Report No. . 93-615C, (Staff Presenter: Paul Harrington, City Planner) - Resolution No. 4409 Approving/Denying Request for Conditional Use Permit to Allow The Continued Use of a Temporary Structure at 7901 Red Oak Drive COUNCIL ACTION: A T D AGENDA PAGE FOUR SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Comments: b. 7:06 p.m. Continuation of Introduction of Ordinance No. 528, Repeal of Sunset Provision of Street Light Utility, Staff Report No. 93-616C, (Staff Presenter: Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator) - Ordinance No. 528 Repealing the Sunset Provision of the Street Light Utility COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: • 10. COUNCIL BUSINESS: A. Continuation of Action on Ordinance No. 529 Establishing a Surface Water Utility and Amending Mounds View Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 73, Staff Report No. 93-617C, (Staff Presenter: Samantha Orduno, City Administrator) COUNCIL ACTION: A T D ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor Linke Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Quick Councilmember Trude Councilmember Wuori Comments: B. Consideration of Approval of Contract Documents for Proposed City Hall Expansion, Staff Report No. 93-618C, (Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator) AGENDA PAGE FIVE SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: • C. Consideration of Certifying the 1994 Proposed Operating Budget, Tax Levies and Setting the Date for a Public Hearing on the Same Pursuant to Truth in Taxation Legislation, Staff Report No. 93-619C, (Staff Presenter: Don Brager, Finance Director) COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 11. REPORTS: 1. Report of Councilmembers: Blanchard: Wuori: Quick: Trude: 2. Report of Mayor Linke: AGENDA PAGE SIX SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 3. Report of Administrator: 4. Report of Staff: 5. Report of Attorney: NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION: OCTOBER 4, 1993, 7:00 P.M. NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: SEPTEMBER 27, 1993, 7:00 P.M. 11. ADJOURNMENT: b:\ag.S13 AppRovED • PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting September 13, 1993 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 CALL TO ORDER The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor Linke at 7 : 00 p.m. on Monday, September 13 , 1993 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was said. OATH OF OFFICE Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, administered the Oath of Office to Councilmember-Elect, Julie Trude. Trude was welcomed to the Council by the Mayor and Councilmembers. Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, stated that the City Council is incorrectly saying the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor L.i.nke, Councilmembers Wuori, Blanchard, Trude, and Quick. MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Don Brager, Finance Director-Treasurer; Paul Harrington, City Planner; Mike Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor; Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator; Jim Thomson, City Attorney Mayor Linke announced that Dick Schmidlin, the City's mechanic and 15 year employee, passed away on the afternoon of September 13 , 1993 . Mayor Linke described some of the duties that Dick performed as a City employee. Mayor Linke also stated that the City Hall flag will be flown at half staff until after Dick's funeral in his honor and that City Hall will be closed for the funeral. Mayor Linke stated that Dick will be greatly missed by all. 'Mounds View City Council Page o Regular Meeting September 13 , .33 APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to approve minutes of August 25, 1993 , Canvassing Board Meeting as presented. VOTE: 4 ayes 1 abstention 0 nays Motion Carried MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Wuori to approve minutes of August 23 , 1993 , Regular Council Meeting, as presented. VOTE 3 ayes 2 abstentions 0 nays Motion Carried SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: Mayor Linke introduced and read Resolution No. 4419, "Salute to Youth" Award to Tri-City Red Baseball Team. MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Quick to adopt Resolution No. 4419, "Salute to Youth" Award to Tri-City Red Baseball Team VOTE: 5 ayes . 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Linke presented this award on behalf of the City to the Coach, Mark Kalata, and the manager, Elmer Buttweiller, of the Tri-City Red Baseball, Team for a job well done. CONSENT AGENDA Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, read the Consent Agenda. Mayor Linke asked if there were any items the Council desired removed from the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Trude asked that Item F. , Consideration of Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement for the Fire Training Association, be removed from theConsent Agenda for further discussion. - MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Trude to adopt the Consent Agenda minus Item F. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Blanchard to Table the Consideration of Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement for the Fire Training Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, explained that in December of 1990, • the previous Council had entered into a Joint Powers Agreement with Brooklyn Center, Blaine, Fridley, Spring Lake Park and Columbia Heights to construct a Fire Training facility. Blaine, Mounds View and Spring Lake Park were considered as one entity in regards to this project. Orduno stated that $50, 000 had been set aside out of the bond issue for the training facilitil, Since that time Columbia Heights has opted out of the Joint Powers Mounds View City Council Page Three 41, Regular Meeting September 13 , 1993 Agreement. This agreement would be amended to delete any reference to Columbia Heights and also amend the cost from $200, 000 to $150, 000 as the City's share. The most recent information is that construction has begun in some form. Orduno stated that as a provision of the Agreement, all decisions were delegated to the Chief's Committee which is comprised of all of the Chiefs from the cities listed. above. The cities had not been informed of . any decisions regarding this facility. Mayor Linke stated that he is asking that this item be tabled so that it can be discussed further before Mounds View signs the document. Mayor Linke - - -st-ated that_he would like to see more controlputinto the agreement involving the cities. Linke stated that the Joint Powers Agreement gives the cities no control as to how the funds are spent. Mayor Linke stated that all cities have not signed off on the Agreement, therefore, it could be amended and resigned by the City that has already approved it. Orduno stated that any amendments to the Joint Powers Agreement that Mounds View makes would have to be given to theother cities. Orduno stated that per the Agreement Fridley is the operating agent and that Fridley was also unaware of the status of the construction of the facility. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 411 RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR There were no requests nor comments from the residents at this meeting concerning any issues not on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 : 05 D.M. Continuation of Request for C.U.P. - 7901 Red Oak Drive Mayor Linke opened the continuation of the public hearing to consider the request for Conditional Use Permit to allow the continued use of a temporary structure at 7901 Red Oak Drive at 7: 17 p.m. Paul Harrington, City Planner, explained_that -thispublic-hearing was continued from the August 23 , 1993 meeting to afford the Council more time to review the request. Harrington stated that in 1988 the applicant had made application for a conditional use permit to allow for a temporary portable classroom on the premises located at 7901 Red Oak Drive which the City Council approved. This Conditional Use Permit would sunset after a five year period. The applicant is asking for a continued use of the portable classroom. The Planning Commission reviewed this request and recommended it be approved with contingencies. Mayor Linke stated that he would like to add an additional contingency to the already proposed contingencies which would be to pave the parking lot under the temporary structure upon its removal. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. • Mounds View City Council Page Four Regular Meeting September 13 , 4103 MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Quick to Adopt Resolution No. 4409 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for a Temporary Portable Classroom for Church Upon the Rock, 7901 Red Oak Drive, As Amended, by Adding a Fourth Contingency which States that the Parking Area Under the Temporary Structure Be Paved Upon Its Removal VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Councilmember Trude added that the Church Upon the Rock stated that they have plans to move. Paul Harrington stated that Church Upon the Rock is pursuing other sites, not necessarily in Mounds View. Harrington also stated that Church Upon the Rock was not able to secure a site prior to this class year, but will be relocating immediately after this school year. Continuation of Introduction of Ordinance No. 528 - Street Light Utility Mayor Linke stated that in his discussions with the residents regarding budgets for utilities, he found that many of the residents didn't understand the process of how taxes were arrived at. Mayor Linke gave a presentation on how taxes are derived and gave examples of how business, commercial, residential and apartment taxes affect one another. Also included in th' presentation was how the street light, proposed storm water utility and property tax numbers were arrived at. Mayor Linke used metro-wide numbers to show how the tax dollars varied. Mayor Linke also commented on the number of residents in Mounds View who would benefit from itemizing their property taxes on Schedule A or deducting their federal taxable income. Mayor Linke stated that he contacted the IRS and found that approximately 20 percent of the residents in Mounds View itemize their taxes which is approximately 562 residents. Mayor Linke stated that when he thought about the different ways and means of raising $72 , 000 he had to find a way that would be of benefit to the City as a whole, not just to a portionofthe City residents-. - Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, thanked Mayor Linke for his presentation, but stated that using metro-wide numbers really didn't show how Mounds View was affected. Ruth White, 2917 County Road I, brought up the fact that many people take advantage of itemizing their property taxes, the circuit breaker, or refund programs. Ms. White stated she is opposed to having anything placed on utility bills. Ms. White prefers additional taxes be placed on her property tax. Councilmember Trude stated that many taxpayers do use the renters' credit, filing form MPR-1, which subsidizes a portionof the rent whether or not • they itemize on their tax returns. Mounds View City Council Page Five "regular Meeting September 13 , 1993 Mayor Linke stated that these credits do not make up the difference saved between taxes and utilities. Councilmember Trude stated that whether a person itemizes or not depends on the age of the homeowner because newer homeowners often have very large deductions for their mortgage interest payments. Mayor Linke stated that earnings are the key to whether a person itemizes or not. Mayor Linke stated he does not itemize because he doesn't have enough deductions, and yet, he has two mortgages, one at 17%. Duane McCarty stated that the County sets the market values for the properties and that there is a methodology used that maintains continuity of fairness within the system. Mayor Linke spent a great deal of time on the phone with Ramsey County personnel discussing how the valuation for properties was set. Mayor Linke stated that Ramsey County explained that the market value is derived from a random sampling of homes being sold in the community. Homes at the time of the valuation that was being discussed were selling for $120, 000, but these were new homes being ,sold. This is what was driving up the market value. McCarty stated that under the law it can't work that way. McCarty stated 411that the County uses sales comparisons for like properties. Mayor Linke stated that the average sale price of homes in Mounds View is what was used. McCarty stated that this is a job for the City Attorney perhaps. Councilmember Trude stated that when she was out talking to people many of them had received 10% increases in their home market valuations and were very unhappy. Mayor- Linke -stated- that -he called Ramsey County to-discuss- market values -- - - - regarding properties and could not get the County to return his calls. Finally, Mayor Linke stated that he called Terry Schutten's office. Don Brager, the City's Finance Director also called and his calls were never returned. Councilmember Trude stated that market values determine the amount of taxation. Mayor Linke stated that he was told by Ramsey County that many residential properties went down, but when he talked to residents he couldn't find even one person whose property taxes went down. Roger Stigney, 8400 Eastwood Road, stated that the comparison that the Mayor made was user fees versus taxes, but there are other means such as special assessments. Stigney stated that one of the other factors in placing the. Mounds View City Council Page ix Regular Meeting September 13 , 3 utility tax on the property taxes is that it gives accountability to the residents. Mayor Linke stated that this utility also would be accountable to the residents. There are public hearings throughout the entire budget process. This utility would be identical to the sewer and water utilities and would be approved at the same time as the budget. Mr. Stigney stated that the five Councilpersons make the decisions on these items, ,whether a public hearing is held or not. Mayor Linke stated that the five Councilpersons are elected by the City as a whole and make the decisions for the best interest of the community as a whole. Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator, stated that this item had been continued from the August 23 , 1993 meeting to give the new Councilmember time to review the ordinance. This ordinance had been given a sunset date to look at the rates and reconstruct the utility as a whole. Any action that the Council takes will only continue or discontinue the utility. The Council can either waive the reading and approve the introduction or move to deny the approval of the introduction of the 111 ordinance. Councilmember Trude stated that it was helpful to have more time to study the utility. Councilmember Trude stated that while she was campaigning residents expressed concern because of the darkness and the rate of vandalism and crime. These persons were basically in the southwest portion of the City. Trude stated that there is a need for more streetlights, however, stated that she had a problem with the rate of the utility. Ms. Trude suggested that the Council should follow the Charter and set just and reasonable rates. This utility budget has $25, 000 to date and there will be a $55 , 000 surplus by the end of the year. Ms. Trude stated that she would like to see the rate cut in half. - Councilmember Blanchard stated that this ordinance should be sunsetted. $25, 000 was collected this year and. by the end of this year there will be a total of $50, 000. Blanchard stated that at the time that this ordinance went into effect it was assumed that it would be used for streetlights. The City only received six requests for streetlights. Blanchard stated that with the electric and gas franchise fee, the City is taxing the people twice. Blanchard stated that it is not ethical. Blanchard suggested that perhaps one month of the franchise fee could be dedicated to the streetlight fund if funds are needed for streetlights. Mayor Linke asked Councilmember Blanchard if what she was saying was to sunset the utility fee and place the amount to be raised on the taxes. • Mayor Linke stated that the need is $50, 000 . Mounds View City Council Page Seven Regular Meeting September 13 , 1993 Councilmember Blanchard stated that quarterly the City raises $18 , 000 and spend approximately $15, 000. This means that there still is something coming in on utility. It is not right to tax the residents twice. Councilmember Trude stated that this utility could be abandoned for one year and looked at again and the fee could be adjusted. Councilmember Blanchard stated that after one year, if it would become necessary, the utility could be reconsidered. Blanchard stated that the City is taxing the residents twice, once with the electric franchise and once on the streetlight utility. Councilmember Trude stated that she would like to ask Mr. Brager how wise it would be to spend down the fund and then reconsider it later. Mayor Linke stated that when this utility went in to effect the rates were set, now because of an excess, the rates appear to be too high and the rates could be adjusted if the street light utility were continued. Mayor Linke stated that perhaps the $14 . 00 rate is too high. Mayor Linke stated that he would not like to see the utility eliminated altogether. Councilmember Quick stated that, at the last Work Session, the Police Department was asked to relook at where there is a need for street lights in the City. Councilmember Quick stated that the Council should proceed prudently and look at the list of where street lights are needed. Councilmember Trude stated that the need for streetlights in the City is not totally a crime problem. The residents in the southwest portion of the City complained about adding this utility to their bill as they don't have street lights and are paying for them. Mayor Linke stated that each year in the newsletter there is an article on streetlights and how residents should go about getting that information to the City. Councilmember Quick statedthatevery year-- the -state-changes rules and we - - have to adjust every year. Councilmember Quick stated that the City should prudently move forward with street lights and evaluate the situation before making hasty decisions. Councilmember Blanchard stated again that this ordinance should be sunsetted. Councilmember Blanchard stated that this utility was to be a temporary fix until the franchise fee came into effect, now, with the franchise fee and utility the residents are being taxed twice. Mayor Linke stated that the City uses $125, 000 of the franchise fee for taxes. Orduno stated that the City is receiving $200, 000 per year assuming 1991 was • an average year. Orduno stated that in speaking to NSP, the fund will be down considerably because of the cool summer this year. The fee collected Mounds View City Council Page Ei ht Regular Meeting September 13 , 3 for 1992 should be between $170, 000 and $190 , 000. Orduno explained that for a January billing the City won't receive any funds until March. This means the City only receives 10 months worth of payments in 1993 . Councilmember Wuori stated that she strongly agreed with Councilmember Trude's evaluation. There are areas in the City that do need street lights. Many residents have not gone through the process and let the City know that they need a street light. At the last Council Work Session the City Council decided to become more proactive in regards to placement of streetlights. There is a need for $50, 000 if the City is to be more proactive, but after that point it may drop down. The rate could be rearranged or changed on a - yearly basis which would be a big budget item each year. Councilmember Wuori stated that she was in favor of keeping the utility and becoming more proactive with regard to street lights and adjusting the rate on a yearly basis. Bill Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, stated that he is in opposition to this street light utility. Mr. Werner stated that he felt the City conned the public with the fact that this street light utility would be sunsetted in two years. Werner stated that now it will continue like all of the others and will go on forever. Mr. Werner questioned the Council as to the need for funding for extra lights when there is currently money in the account. Mayor Linke stated that there is a surplus in the account. There was no track record for this utility in the beginning and_ the rate is too high. The rate can now be adjusted. Bill Werner stated that the rate should drop to zero, however, then the Council would have to start all over to convince the people. Mayor Linke stated that if the money isn't raised through a street light utility, then it would have to go on the taxes. Bill Werner asked the Council if it is easier to convince the residents to spend money in an already existing account or tax them for it. Mayor Linke stated that the City would still have to pay $53 , 000 for electric to run the lights and maintain them. The City has $50, 000 in that account but what happens to the next year. Mayor Linke stated that he does not think one year at a time, but five to 10 years in advance. Mayor Linke stated that the City would like to be fiscally sound in five years. Bill Werner stated the funding should go on the taxes. If the clever financing methods and user fees continue, there will be 40 more special funds. Councilmember Trude stated that the utility is a tax and now the decision is what manner of taxing should be used -- should the City spend down the account or keep it as a reserve and adjust the rates to match the costs. Trude stated that the City is conservative and has always tried to have a• safety cushion so as not to have to borrow funds. • Mounds View City Council Page Nine Regular Meeting September 13 , 1993 Naja Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, stated that in the last two years the City has imposed a utility fee, imposed a franchise fee for gas and electric and now are proposing an additional fee for a surface water management utility. If a Mounds View taxpayer were to sit down and add up these fees on a yearly basis and had that amount placed on property taxes he would scream "bloody murder" . The City continues to put more and more fees on the taxpayers. Ms. Werner stated that it was her belief that this was the wrong philosophy. Mayor Linke stated that the taxpayers would be paying more if this amount would be put on their- taxes th-an- they-are paying on a utility fee. Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, stated that the Council and staff should get into a retreat as soon as possible. Mr. McCarty suggested that the Council pull back on these additional charges and calculate theamount to be placed on the 1994 taxesand then get citizens involved and make the FOCUS 2000 work. Mr. McCarty stated at this rate the residents are building up resentment for the Council and it will continue until the Bel-Rae will be filled again. The "hidden taxes" will not work. Mayor Like stated that the tax rate can be adjusted now, however, in the beginning there was no track record to go by as far as rates are concerned. * McCarty stated that Councilmember Wuori stated that the City Council has decided to take a more proactive stance on street lights. Mayor Linke stated that the installation of street lights is based on resident requests and petitions just as it was when Mr. McCarty was Mayor. Mayor Linke was not at the Work Session in which the proactive stance was discussed, but stated that it is time to become more proactive with regard to the street lights. The Council has requested that the Police earmark high crime areas and the City can be more proactive and put in street lights where they are needed. Duane McCarty stated that _theCouncil has to take -a- proactive -stance and use-the talents and energies of his staff. McCarty stated that this has not been done in the past. McCarty stated that the Council should back off and come back to the residents with a proactive plan -- a plan to get support of the community. Mayor Linke stated that he is not in favor of putting in a street light where it is not wanted by the residents just because the Police have earmarked that location for a street light. Duane McCarty stated that if the area is a high crime area and the Police have suggested a street light be put in to aid in the reduction of crime, the citizens will more than likely come forth and support the placement. 411Mr. Werner asked if the street light utility fund is a designated or undesignated fund. Mounds View City Council Page Ten Regular Meeting September 13 , 3 Mayor Linke stated that the street light utility fund is a designated fund and those monies are collected and expended for the purpose of street light operation and maintenance. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, stated that the City doesn't have an undesignated fund for long. Most of time the surplus from an account is designated promptly. Ed Werdien, 6940 Silver Lake Road, asked why the City is taking $200, 000 from the water and sewer fund to put an expansion on the City Hall building. 'Mr Werdien-stated he read this in The Bulletin. Mr. Werdien suggested letting the rates go down and don't do any work on the City Hall building. Mr. Werdien stated that the building needs no expansion. Mr. Werdien stated that Mounds View has the highest water and sewer rates around. The only City lower is Lino Lakes. Orduno stated that there is a certain amount to be transferred from one fund and placed in another. Naja Werner read from The Bulletin the following, "Currently, the city hall building fund has a $371, 000 balance. The additional money for the project will be transferred from the city's general, sewer, water and undesignated funds. " Naja Werner questioned, "what is a designated fund?" Orduno explained that a designated fund is a fund where the money that goes into it is designated to buy equipment and services for a certain program. These funds can be transferred from one fund to another. In times where there are undesignated funds or surplus funds where the City has spent less than budgeted, those funds are undesignated until they are designated. Naja Werner stated that then if there were a certain amount of money for sewer and the taxpayer thinks it is being used. for sewer, the Council can actually use it elsewhere. Mayor Linkestatedthat if the money were to be taken- out ofwaterit would - be used for something to do with that department. Orduno explained that the rates are lower in New Brighton because of the army settlement that happened years ago and the money is used to buy down sewer and water rates. Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, stated that a sunset was provided on this utility so that the utility could come to an end so that the City could assess what had taken place and go on from there. Mr. Frits stated that now is the time to end the utility and assess its success or failure. Mayor Linke stated that the rate is more than what is requested because there now is a track record. If the street light utility were to continu the rate could now be lowered. Mayor Linke stated that he has been oppos� to sunsetting this utility since the very beginning. Linke stated that the • Mounds View City Council Page Eleven (regular Meeting September 13 , 1993 sunset provision was put into the utility so a discussion could take place. This utility has worked and has actually worked to well. It is now time to assess the rates. Naja Werner stated that there is a $50, 000 surplus. If the rate isn't changed, the City will continue to build up a surplus in the fund and the Council can take this surplus amount of money in the fund and use it as they choose. Werner stated that projects could be completed such as expanding City Hall more. Werner stated that the taxpayers need to know that the Council can do what they want with the surplus money even if the taxpayers would be opposed to what is being done. Mayor 'Linke stated that the rate setting of this utility would be part of the public hearing process for the budget. Ruth White, 2917 County Road I, stated that she is opposed to this utility. Ms. White stated that she doesn't share the same user fee philosophy as the Council likes. Ms. White states these user fees are taxes. Ms. White stated that when she thinks of a user fee she thinks of a fee that she pays to use the park or the golf course. The needed amount of money should be put on property taxes. Ms. White stated that she doesn't think that the Council should tell her what is best for her. Ms. White stated that she itemizes and gets money back on her taxes. Ms. White stated that the sunset clause was put on so that the utility would be more acceptable and 410compatible to the people. Ms. White stated that in the past the general fund was used for City street lights and it should come from that fund again. Mayor Linke then asked Ms. White if the water and sewer should also come from the general fund. Ruth White stated that she gets a bill for the water and sewer because she is using the water and sewer. Ms. White stated that she considers the utility fee a maintenance fee. Ms. White also asked if this street light fee was used for County roads. Mayor Linke responded that the County takes care of County roads and this utility is not used on those roads. Duane McCarty stated that the water and sewer charges are the funding mechanism which runs the water and sewer department and are billed separately and that can be monitored by the residents. Mayor Linke stated that the street light utility can also be monitored and it does appear on the same bill as the water and sewer. Duane McCarty stated that it appears on the billing in a three letter code and that, in his opinion, 80 percent of the residents don't know what the code stands for. McCarty stated that he feels the residents think it is a Alivalid charge for sewer and water operations. McCarty stated that he had to call City hall to have the code deciphered. Mounds View City Council Page Twelve Regular Meeting September 13 , 4103 Mayor Linke closed the public hearing for the street light utility at 8:50 p.m. CouncilmemberTrude suggested that this ordinance be amended to adjust the rates to be just and reasonable. Councilmember Quick stated that the introduction of the ordinance could be approved at this meeting and amended at the next meeting upon the next vote. Bill Frits called for a Point of Order. Mr. Frits stated that the Council washaving a discussion with no motion on the floor: Mayor Linke stated that there are two processes that an ordinance receives. One of the processes is its introduction and the other process is its adoption and there has to be a 14 day span between the two actions. Bill Frits stated that during the public hearing the Mayor called the residents to order. Orduno stated that there is nothing in the State laws that require an ordinance to have a first and second reading. The ordinance has an introduction and its adoption 14 days apart. More and more cities are moving towards these terms regarding ordinances. IIM MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to Approve the Introduction of Ordinance No. 528, Repeal of Sunset Provision of Street Light Utility and Waive the Reading of the Same VOTE: 4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried COUNCIL BUSINESS A. MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Quick to Remove from the Table the Continuation of Action on Ordinance No. 529 Establishing a Surface Water Utility and Amending-Mounds View Municipal Code by Adding Chapter - 73 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed Staff Report No. 93-617C Regarding Continuation of Action on Ordinance No. 529 Establishing a Surface Water Utility and Amending Mounds View Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 73 . Orduno reported that at the August 23 Council Meeting, the City Council tabled to the meeting of September 13 the continuation of action on Ordinance No. 529 . In the interim time, staff was to examine an alternative rate structure which would lessen the burden of the utility charges to the City's business community. Rocky Keene, Short- Elliott-Hendrickson developed an alternative rate structure and presented it for Council review at the September 7 Work Session. • Mounds View City Council Page Thirteen Regular Meeting September 13 , 1993 Orduno reported that the original rate structure is included in the packet as Scenario 1. The alternative rate structure is attached as Scenario 2 which would raise the yearly residential householdcost by $. 91. This rate structure would raise the yearly costs for church and school property classifications. Orduno asked Rocky Keene and Mike Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor, to do a presentation on the projects listed in the surface water utility. This will include impacts on certain areas of the City and on the City as a whole. Staff---does- not have recommendation an -th-i-s ordinance. -- The options- . would be to adopt or not adopt the ordinance. The rate structure would be formally set by resolution. The Council is at the adoption stage and it would be a roll call vote. Rocky Keene, hydrologist from SEH, the cities consulting engineers, gave a definition of the projects listed in the Local Water Management Plan. Keene reported that the Council, during the past five years, as a result of the Long Lake Road reconstruction, asked SEH to complete two studies to see what impacts certain drainage areas would have on the Long Lake Road project. One was the Ardan Avenue drainage district and the other is the Edgewood. drainage district. Mr. Keene listed those projects that were identified that would need to be constructed . in association with Long Lake Road and those that were impacted by the Long Lake Road Project. Mr. Keene stated that SEH worked. with City staff when the plan was written to determine some projects that have to be done in addition to the others throughout the City. Most of these projects are maintenance projects such as storm sewer outlets, outlet modifications, and sedimentation ponds, and controlling the City's water quality. Keene reported that the final area that was looked at in the Plan was the feasibility studies. The purpose of these studies are related to -- wetland issues. All the wetland issues have had a feasibility study connected to—them. There are other project including stzeet weeping, general maintenance of the storm sewer system and general cleaning listed in the Plan. Ditch cleaning, catch basin repair and cleaning, street sweeping is an important water quality aspect which could also be funded by the Plan. Wetlands are another important issue and, therefore,, sedimentation removal should be a part of the Plan. Mr. Keene gave a history of the City's storm sewer structure. Much of this system was built in the 1950's. A major portion of the storm sewer was constructed for sanitary sewer and not necessarily for storm water drainage. The total construction of future projects identified in the Plan will cost $1. 2 million. The only projects to take place • within the next five years are the feasibility studies. -II'' • Mounds View City Council Page Fourteen Regular Meeting September 13 , 4103 Mayor Linke stated that the storm water plan that was proposed in 1978 and it was several millions of dollars, where this Plan looks at completing the wetlands and utilizing the wetlands to fill the needs that were identified. The Plan looks at these projects over a period of time. The Plan is a proactive plan for the future. Councilmember Trude read the 1978 Citizens' Task Force report and a lot of the currently proposed projects come from what citizens wanted in the '70s. Ditch cleaning and pond cleaning have not been kept up due tolackof money. Trude stated her-big concern was the projects and whether they are all justified. Rocky Keene stated that one of the major concerns was water quality or the removal of the sediment prior to discharging water Out of the City. Councilmember Trude asked if the capital improvement projects are justified. Trude stated that ditch cleaning has not been going on as there has not been enough staff. Mike Ulrich stated that in the last six years there has been no ditch cleaning. The Ardan Avenue ditch has two feet of sediment in it. Trude stated that another issue that came up during talks with • residents was that the residents in Silver View Park felt that they would not have any expenses relating to this Plan because their yards drain into the pond. Trude stated some of the drainage into the pond could cause a problem for the City as sediment from Silver View Pond will need to. be cleaned out. Mike Ulrich stated there had been five or six sink holes due to faulty pipes or breaks and cracks in pipes because the ground level has been so dry. In 1992 streets were swept 300 hours. The streets need to be swept more-than-that. -- Only- 60 hours-of -storm-sewer-work-has-been done. - More cleaning needs to be done on the storm sewers. Councilmember Trude stated that some of these items were recommended in 1978 and there are justifiable and reasonable projects in the Plan. The other issue is the financing of the Plan and where do the funds come from. Naja Werner said that one of the high priority projects in the Plan was on Sherwood Road. Ms. Werner has lived on Sherwood Road for 38 years and asked what has to be done. Ms. Werner stated that no one on the road has ever had a water problem. . Rocky Keene stated that Ardan Avenue has been the study area of the city since the 1970's. A study was done. by the citizens that looked. Mounds View City Council Page Fifteen * Regular Meeting September 13 , -1993 ponding water. If the City wants to size the storm sewer and street improvements to the recommended standards of today, a storm sewer system would have to be put in Sherwood Road. Ms. Werner stated that she knows there are problems on Knollwood Drive because that area is swampy. Rocky Keene stated that the water from Sherwood is adding to the problem on Ardan Avenue. The Sherwood system must be made an independent system which would help Ardan Avenue residents. -Councilmember- Blanchard asked Rocky Keene to differentiate between the soils of residential and commercial areas. Mr. Keene explained that the community of Mounds View is based on two different soil types -- sand and loam soil. A big portion of the sandy soil runs down Highway 10 and the business and industrial areas have less of a runoff than the loam soils. A lot of communities do not go through the exercise of weighting the runoff. Mayor Linke stated that Scenario #1 is based on those having the most runoff and Scenario #2 has the commercial and business properties as which having less runoff potential. 411 Roger Stigney asked if rather than redoing the sewer line, has there been some consideration of tying into that line. • Mr. Keene stated that the best way was to run a parallel line to Ardan Avenue and it could be tied into any street improvement project. This is a more cost effective system. Most cities tend to improve the storm sewer at the time they feel they need a street improvement. The curb and gutter type system lasts longer. Long Lake Road would go in and if oversizing has to be done, Long Lake Road would not have to be done in five or ten years. Roger- Stigney-asked if it were-allocated-for- 1994 or 1995--to put that storm sewer in. Mayor Linke stated that this project is listed in the Long Term Financial Plan, but if there is a need elsewhere and not a need in this area, it will not be done at that time. Councilmember Trude stated that some cities are giving credits to those businesses who have planned for the runoff from their properties. Mr. Keene stated that the credit plan that is most successful is to have a review of individuals who wish to apply for a credit. The individual can work with City staff and come up with a recommendation to the Council as to why they should have a credit. There are many scenarios that could come up for credits. Individuals would have to come in and prove that they are not contributing to the system. • Mounds View City Council Page Sixteen Regular Meeting September 13 , 4103 Keene stated that the utility is based on volume of runoff and, even though they may have a pond on site and reduced the rate of runoff, the same volume of water will runoff the property. Duane McCarty asked how many projects are non-compliant with the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act. A discussion followed between Mayor Linke and Mr. McCarty with regard to how the projects became listed in the Plan. Mr.-Keene stated that whentheprocesswasstarted therearethree approaches to consider when you do a plan -- meet the steps of the law, and do projects to improve the City or thirdly, do nothing. McCarty confirmed that none of the projects had to be taken on as a mandate regarding the Plan. McCarty stated that the best way to do the Plan is to do it through the process of the Home Rule Charter that gives the citizens the rights to petition for or against any project. McCarty stated he is willing to take the assessments if he wants the project. McCarty stated that if the public supports the project it will go. Roger Stigney stated that the City is rushing to hurry up and do something when there is no need to do something promptly. The Plan is in place and the City has met the requirements by just having the Plan. Mr. Keene stated that the City is beyond. the date for implementation of the Plan. Roger Stigney spoke about the funding in that it is a City-wide project and it should be given to the FOCUS 2000 program for review. Mr. Stigney pointed out that the July-August newsletter only offered a small notice regarding the Surface Water Management Utility public hearings. Mr. Stigney- felt-that- more-communication could have-been- -- added to this newsletter and it would have solicited more public input. Mr. . Stigney stated that the Council should push off the utility until one of the Task Forces could look at it with regards to options for funding. Mayor Linke stated that special assessments and looking at the maintaining of the wetlands and sediment ponds is a benefit to the entire city. Special assessments do not benefit the entire city. Mr. Stigney stated that he paid for special assessments already and he wants a credit for paying for the storm sewer down his road for the last 14 years. Mayor Linke explained the credit process regarding the surface water• utility. AllMounds View City Council Page Seventeen IMIRegular Meeting September 13 , 1993 A discussion followed by Council and staff regarding the storm sewer system and the need for bigger storm drains. Mayor Linke stated that this Plan has been in the works for over five years. Mr. Stigney stated that the Task Force should look this Plan over and solicit information from the citizens. Stigney stated that if the storm sewer is so important cut back on the City Hall expansion. Naja Werner stated that when the storm sewer went in there was a frontage fee and an area assessment. Those with larger lots were affected the most. Some of the assessments to residents was $25, 000. This fee was for both sanitary and storm sewer. Trude stated that the Citizens Task Force report suggested that the runoff formula be used and that all she could see was a tremendous price tag for the people living in those areas. Naja Werner stated that because of all of the opposition to this Plan, the Home Rule Charter was developed. It took one year to write the 410 Charter and the main purpose for the Charter was that the citizens of Mounds View could have input. There had been other instances where the people were against issues and the Council approved the issues the residents did not want. Ms. Werner brought up the issue of the Anoka County Airport. Werner stated, that in her opinion, the reason for the Charter is so the residents can vote on these issues. McCarty stated that many of the recommendations of the Citizens Task Force could be used today. McCarty stated that this City not retrack hard work and hard fought for rights for the citizens and the utility fee does this. The utility fee will circumvent the assessment procedures and petition rights given to the citizens under the Charter. The Charter provides referendum options-to -come back and appeal this issue. McCarty stated that the Council should get the community involved in this funding process. Ruth White stated that the Mayor has betrayed the people who had elected him. White stated that Mayor Linke had stated that he was against this utility. White stated that, in her opinion, he has lost his credibility because he was elected by the residents because he .was against the utility. White states that the residents support the church and the schools and the residents will be stuck twice. Mayor Linke stated that the utility fee is the best way in the long run because it is controlled 100 percent by the City. Linke stated to raise the same amount of money the taxes would have went up without raising any additional money. Mounds View City Council Page Eigh en Regular Meeting September 13 , 3 Councilmember Trude is opposed to the utility and wants to keep the funding on the property tax. Trude stated she has a problem with making churches and schools pay. Trude stated if the projects are dispersed throughout the City equally, then it is up to the people to decide how it should be funded. Trude is opposed to the churches and schools reducing her rates. If the cost is to benefit the whole city it should go on the property taxes. Trude stated there is a great deal of antagonism towards the proposed new utility fee. Trude stated if the projects are important and critical, then the items should be put into the budget now as part of the upkeep of our streets. _- _-- McCarty asked if the City were to go with the surface water utility charge how does the City propose to show benefit to the people. Jim Thomson, City Attorney, stated that the theory behind the surface water management utility is that the City doesn't have to show benefit. McCarty stated that is what is wrong with it, you tax people without showing benefit. Jim Thomson stated that there is a general benefit to the City for implementing the utility. Mayor Linke stated that the utility is a benefit to the City as a 411 whole. Trude stated that it would be a 6 percent increase from last year's amount of tax to fund all of these projects. Trude suggested perhaps these projects should funded from a combination of sources. Ruth White asked how the whole city would benefit from the Ardan Avenue project which seems to be a conflict of interest with one of our Councilmembers. Mayor Linkestatedthat- the-Council is looking g-at-the benefit to -the - community as a whole rather than a portion of it. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to Adopt Ordinance No. 529 , Scenario 2 , Establishing a Surface Water Utility and Amending Mounds View Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 73 Trude noticed on that scenario the churches pay a stiffer fee. Trude questioned if the businessmen have had an opportunity to express their viewpoints. Mayor Linke does not support Scenario #2 , because he feels Scenario #1 is treats all properties as though all soils are the same. Mounds View City Council Page Nineteen Regular Meeting September 13 , 1993 MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Quick to move a substitute motion with Scenario #1 rather than Scenario #2 Trude asked how the rates would be set. Orduno stated that this would be done by resolution. ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor Linke - yes eaunc-r member-Blancharcr--No- -- -- ----------- Councilmember Quick - Yes Councilmember Trude - No Councilmember Wuori - Yes Motion Carried 3 ayes 2 nays B. Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator, stated that the next step is to approve the floor plans as discussed at the September 7 Work Session. Milt Powell, Boonestroo and Associates presented the final floor plans and the specifications for the project. Cruikshank stated that approval of this information would mean authorization for Bonestroo and Associates to advertise for bids from general 411 construction contractors to begin the construction phase of the project. Cruikshank stated that it is anticipated that the bids could be received by October 8 and brought to the Council at the October 11 Regular Meeting. Cruikshank further stated that if the bid were to be awarded at the October 11 meeting, construction could begin October 18. A discussion among staff and Council occurred with regard to inputs from each department regarding the expansion. Orduno stated that it is a very cost effective plan. Linke stated that there are more meeting rooms now. Orduno stated that she no longer has to move from her office because of lack of space for meetings. Orduno explained that the Council Chambers--is used_a lot- and-that-people--no--longer have to — meet in the lunch room or kitchen downstairs. Mayor Linke spoke to Tim Cruikshank about getting speakers in the back of the Chambers. Don Brager, Finance Director-Treasurer, stated that there had been a proposal to update the video equipment in the Council Chambers. The City is looking at having a document camera and from the document camera the image would go to the cable audience and to the monitors in the room. Part of the proposal was to put a public address system into the Councilroom and out into the foyer. This is an item which is a combination of budget from the 1993 budget and a grant from the cable commission. This may become a reality yet this year for the 411 Councilroom. Mounds View City Council Page Twenty Regular Meeting September 13 , 3 MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Wuori to Approve the Contract Documents for Proposed City Hall Expansion and to Authorize the Bidding Process VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried C. Don Brager, Finance Director-Treasurer, reported that Resolution 4418 certifies to Ramsey County the City's Property Tax Levy and sets the ity's public-hearing on tie 1994 13u�C get for Wednesday,- December 8, 1:993 at 7: 00 p.m. Don Brager gave a presentation on process for the 1994 Budget. Don Brager fielded questions from the Council regarding the State aids and decrease in values from commercial/industrial properties. Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, stated that looking at 30.9 percent increase in taxes is totally absurd. Mayor Linke stated that the numbers that go to the residents from the County in November are bogus as the City's budget process is not complete at that time. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to Adopt Resolution No. 4418 Certifying the 1994 Proposed Property Tax Levies and Setting the Date for a Public Hearing on the Same Pursuant to Truth in Taxation Legislation Bill Frits asked what would happen if the City would not adopt the resolution. Orduno stated that the City would loose part of its December's state aid. Orduno stated that Mr. Frits is not the first person to ask that question. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Linke adjourned the September 13 , 1993 Council Meeting to an Executive Session of the City Council at 11: 10 p.m. The Council will return following the Executive Session. Mayor Linke reconvened the September 13 , 1993 Council Meeting at 11:24 p.m. Mayor Linke reported that in Executive Session the Council discussed with the Administrator and Attorney a possible settlement against the City of Mounds View. Staff was directed to pursue the settlement and also to find the funding in an amount not to exceed $5, 000. • Mounds View City Council Page Twenty-One (regular Meeting September 13 , 1993 REPORTS 1. Report of Councilmembers: Councilmember Blanchard - No report. Councilmember Wuori - No report. Councilmember Quick - No report. Councilmember Trude- Thanked-City Staffforth warm welcome and extra time spent answering questions. Trude encouraged all residents tobring any questions to the Council or staff as they were very helpful. 2 . Report of Mayor: • Mayor Linke : a. In the packet there was a note about a possible joint meeting with the Spring Lake Park Council to discuss two items. These items are the signal light at Highway 10 and 111 Pleasantview and a possible development behind the lots on Pleasantview Also, the possible renaming of Lakeside Park will be addressed. Mayor Linke added an item to that agenda which was the Fire Training Facility. This meeting will take place at 5: 30 p.m. at Spring Lake Park City Hall. Bill Frits asked if something is being done with the well house on Wood Lake. Orduno stated the City will check into this. Frits stated this is a well put in jointly by the old town of Mounds View and Spring Lake Park. Frits stated it was Ramsey County. b. - Last-week-Mayor Linke -was on vacation. Went-to--Branson and---— felt really refreshed. 3 . Report of Administrator a. Orduno will inform Council of funeral arrangements and can discuss the closing of City Hall. This has been very difficult for staff and strongly urged the Council to close City Hall on the day of the funeral. Mayor Linke had concerns about those who could not attend because they don't feel up to attending the funeral. Orduno explained Dick was not just a coworker but was a friend to many of the people. Some staff will not be emotionally able to return to work. Mounds View City Council Page Twenty-Two Regular Meeting September 13 , 4113 4 . Report of Staff: Paul Harrington reported that on Wednesday evening, Peg Mountin will be attending her last Planning Commission meeting. Ms. Mountin has resigned her position. The Planning Commission will come forward with a recommendation for Chair to the City Council at the first meeting in October. The Vice Chair, Jerry Peterson, will take Ms. Mountin's place until a new Chair is appointed. Tim Cruikshank reported that the first of the FOCUS 2000 meetings will begin on Wednesday with a Chair and Co-Chair Meetings beginning at 5: 30 and the remainder of the groups beginning at 7 : 00. 5 . Report of Attorney: Jim Thomson reported on two cases -- one regarding regulation of nude dancing in liquor establishments (Coates case) and the other an open meeting law case. The situation was that three members of a Council were attending a Planning Commission meeting and went next door to further discuss an issue. • This was in violation of the Open Meeting Law. Jim Thomson stated that the next step in the case is the attorney's fees. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before this Council, Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 11: 35 p.m. Respectfully-su •mitted-, • ._. A -%p1 ' • _ Michiele Severson Recording Secretary Agenda Section: 7.A ©MOS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 93-621C Report Date: 9-8-93 EW STAFF REPORT Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE September 13, 1993 ❑ Public Hearings KI Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Consideration of a Budget Transfer for Purchase of Recycling Bins Administrator's Review/Recommendation: /�,_� - No comments to supplement this report l/n�--- - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplemen s necessary.) SUMMARY: In order to replenish the City's stock of recycling bins, staff is requesting that an inter-fund transfer be made from the recycling printing and postage budgets into the recycling capital fund. The bins will be identical to those purchased with grant funds in 1990. The bins were not included in the 1993 budget and authorization for this purchase will require the approval of the attached resolution. C eL-'2(-` )LTJ ',__JiGrvm Carla Asleson Recycling Coordinator RECOMMENDATION; Approve Resolution No. 4417, authorizing an inter-fund transfer and budget amendment for the purchase of recycling bins. I RESOLUTION NO. 4417 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING INTER-FUND BUDGET TRANSFERS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mounds View supports a strong curbside recycling program; and WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View has, in the past, .provided recycling bins to residents to encourage recycling; and WHEREAS, the City has unexpectedly run out of its supply of recycling bins; and WHEREAS, the purchase of additional recycling bins are not a budgeted item in the 1993 recycling budget; and WHEREAS, to provide funds for the purchase of these bins, it is necessary to amend the budget, providing for budget transfers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the following budget amendments and inter-fund budget transfers: • $2 , 000. 00 transferred from account 290-4121-393 to account 290-4121-703 ; and • $500. 00 transferred from account 290-4121-330 to account 290-4121-703 . Adopted this 13th day of September, 1993 . ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator RESOLUTION NO, 4416 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW • COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WHEREAS, The City Council has reviewed the claims numbers: 39504 through 39615 in the amount of $ 75,280.02 38615 through 38648 in the amount of $ 206,534.64 through in the amount of $ through in the amount of $ TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 281,814.66 and has found said claims to be just and correct; • (list of any exception) NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated 09/14/93 by the vote ayes nayes ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Arim;nistrator P 1 ACC8UNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER 10-01 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 14503 SEEKON, STEVE 39504 09/14/93 09/14/93 64.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 ANT- 64.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 64 .00 15200 LARSON, ROY 39505 09/14/93 09/14/93 128.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 AMT- 128.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 128.00 1�222 MINNE] OTA DEPARTMENT14/93 09/14/93 200-00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 50.00 DESC-MN UNIQUE WELL #4935i ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 50.00 DESC-MN UNIQUE WELL 1:1--4935. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 70�-4121 -160000 AMT- 50'00 DESC-�N UNI : WELL 44935/ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 7O0-4121 - i60000 AMT- 50 , J0 DESC-MN U�IQUE �ELL #4935� VENDOR TOTAL 200.00 27102 BERGET , JOHN & VICTOR* 39507 09/14/93 09/14/93 40.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 40.00 DESC-REFUND - 8415 KNOLLW' VENDOR TOTAL 4O.00 28203 GROEBNER, PON 39508 09/14/93 09/14/93 50.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352119 AMT- 50.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 32204 KREMER, LEON�RD 39509 09/14/93 09/14/93 80.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 40.00 DESC-REFUND - 7692 SILVER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 40.00 DESC-REFUND - 7690 SILVE� VENDOR TOTAL 80.00 37200 LIGHTBODY , WARREN 39510 09/14/93 09/14/93 96.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 ANT- 96 .00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 96.00 38205 LlNNELL , PAUL 39511 09/14/93 09/14/93 20.87 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-160213 AMT- 20.87 DESC-PRINTS � � VENDOR TOTAL 20.87 39100 CHIIODO , BILL 39512 09y14/93 09/14/93 50.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352119 AMT- 50^00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 39101 DANIELSON, KEVIN 39513 09/14y93 09/14/93 50.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352119 AMT- 50.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 39102 GIBSON, JOAN 39514 09/14/93 09/14/93 25.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351024 ANT- 25.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 39103 LANDRY , BONNIE 39515 09/14/93 09/14/93 10.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352130 ANT- 10.00 DESC-REFUND 2 � COUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER 10-01 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR BATS AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 10.00 39104 OSOJNICKI , CAROL 39516 09/14/93 09/14/93 25.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351024 AMT- 25.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 39105 PETERSEN, JOHN 39517 09/14/93 09y14/93 50.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352122 ANT- 50.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 50.�0 39106 STAUFFACHER, LEE 39518 09/14/93 09/14/93 50.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-32119 AMT- 50.00 DESC-REFUND VENDORTOTAL 50.00 39107 WHEELER, RACHEL 39519 09/14/93 09/14/93 50.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352120 AMT- 50.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 39108 WOELTGE, TERRY 39520 09/14/93 09/14/93 25.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351024 ANT- 25.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 FUEHRER, LESTER 39521 09/14/93 09/14/93 40.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 40.00 DESC-REFUND - 7800 BONA VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 39110 WEISS, MYRNA 39522 09/14/93 09/143 25.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351024 AMT- 25.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 39111 KINSELLA, MICHAEL 39523 09/14/93 09/14/93 37.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 AMT- 37.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 37.00 39112 MELAND, JA3ON 39524 09/14/'93 09/14/�3 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 ANT- 64.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 39113 RA134ER, JOHN 39525 09/14/93 09/14/93 32.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 ANT- 32.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 32.00 39114 STRUNK, MEL 39526 09/14/93 09/14/93 192.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 AMT- 192.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 192.00 5 KINDERMAN, LENORE 39527 09/14/93 09y14/93 16.50 ��� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352107 AMT- 16.50 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 16.50 9 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGI��E� �0-01 MOUNDS VIEW VEJDC,R CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VEHDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE 1.1MBR DATE AMOUNT 39118 SCHPOEDER, PI:HARD 39528 09/14/93 09/14/93 40.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 40.00 DEED-REFUND - 5273 SUNNYS VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 75316 TOBIASON, NEIL 39529 09/14/93 09/14/93 64.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 AMT- 64.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 75.221 L0DW10, LOREN 39530 99/14 09/14/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 AMT- 64.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 64.O0 85201 MITTEL3T90T, DON 39531 09/14/93 09/14/93 96.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 AMT- 96.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 96.00 95106 SCHLEY , DOUG 39532 09/14/93 09/14/93 50.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352119 AMT- 50.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 98162 WILKEN, JEFF 39533 09/14/93 09/14/93109/14/93411 9/14/93 50.0O ACCOUNT NUMBER- 21.75r - 7,500- 2:. .P-1ANT- 50.00 DESC-REFUND ��� 21.75r - 7,500- 2:.21.75r - 7,500- 2:. .P-1 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 98220 MILLE5, 09/14/93 09/14/93 ` 320.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 AMT- 320.00 :ES, -UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 320.00 A0500 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPL* 39535 09/14/93 021608-00 08/12/93 124.25 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-123000 AMT- 124^25 DEED-BULBS VENDOR TOTAL 124.25 A1025 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER IN* 39536 09/14/93 93-07005 08/30y93 114.23 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-123000 AMT- 114.23 DESC-HOSES , LUG CPLG SET, VENDOR TOTAL 114.23 02626 AIRS1GNAL, INC. 39537 09/14/93 6087318 09/01/93 30.69 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-303000 ANT- 30 .69 DESC-VOICE MONTHLY - SEPT VENDOR TOTAL 30.69 A5123 AMERICAN OFFICE PRODU* 39538 09/14/93 267869 08/20/93 29.93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 ANT- 29.93 DESC-STAPLER ,TAPE DISPENS� VENDOR TOTAL 29.93 A5900 APACHE HOSE & BELTING* 39539 09y14/93 350831 08/l6/93 41 .12 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121- 123000 AMT- 41 . 12 DESC-CAM & GROOVE - 4732 VENDOR TOTAL 41 . 12 B006O BFI TIRE RECYCLERS OF* 39540 09/14/93 8018828 08/16/93 23. 10 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 ANT- 23. 10 DESC-RECYCLE TIRES Pili4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER 10-01 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHEQK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 23. 10 B0650 BASTIEN PRODUCTS INC 39541 09y14/93 606258 09/01/93 33.80 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 33.80 DESC-EASI-CARE VENDOR TOTAL 33.80 B6750 BRAD RAGAN INC 39542 09/14/93 053255 08/19/93 45.75 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 45.75 DESC-PARTS VENDOR TOTAL 45.75 B7100 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, * 39543 09/14/93 201085 08/06/93 287. 16 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 287. 16 DESC-RED BALL DIAMOND ACC VENDOR TOTAL 287. 16 C0635 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQU* 39544 09/14/93 158985 08y31y93 55.69 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 ANT- 55.69 DESC-25 HR SERVICE CALL-a. 39544 09/14/93 158233 08/09y93 42.78 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 ANT- 42.78 DESC-FILTER 39544 09/14/93 155486 05/25/93 50. 12 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-123000 ANT- 50 . 12 DESC-GUARD,WASHER ,BEAR ING 39544 09/14/93 W0010898 07/09y93 830.7O 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-703000 ANT- 276 .90 DESC-30% OF SKIDLOADER UP' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-703000 AMT- 276.90 DESC-30% OF SKIDLOADER UP� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-703000 AMT- 276 .90 DESC-30% OF SKIDLOADER UP 39544 09/14/93 141613 12/13/91 312.00- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-123000 AMT- 312.00- DESC-CREDIT ON RENTAL VENDOR TOTAL 667.29 C2000 CELLULAR ONE 39545 09/14/93 09/14/93 95.61 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-310000 ANT- 95.61 DESC-MONTHLY SERVICE (8/1 39545 09y14/93 08/21/93 39.37 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-310000 ANT- 39.37 DESC-VOICE MAIL & AIRTIME VENDOR TOTAL 134,98 00.000 COACT-TO COACT 3'254� 09/14/93 ()1201 00/09/93 7.45 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AM { - 7. 45 DESC-PARTS FOR GROVELAND 39546 09/14/93 01369 08/27/93 1 .69 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 ANT- 1 .69 DESC-MOUSE TRAP-SILVER VI!. 39546 09/14y93 01268 08/17/93 5.31 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 ANT- • 5.31 DESC-CORD FOR SUMP PUMP 39546 09/14/93 01209 08/10/93 4.35 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 ANT- 4.35 DESC-PVD PIPE & COUPLING 39546 09/14/93 01437 09/03/93 1 .27 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 ANT- 1 .27 DESC-KEY 39546 09/14/93 01426 09/02/93 1 .37 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 1 .37 DESC-FUSE 39546 09/14/93 01250 08/16/93 2.33 • ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 2 .33 DESC-SPARK PLUG 39546 09/14/93 01339 08/25/93 2.76 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-100000 ANT- 2.76 DESC-SCRAPER P 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER „0-01 � MOUNDS VIEW VEJDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVCICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVCICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT 3546 09/14/93 01332 08/24/93 2.61 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 2.61 DESC-2 KEYS VENDOR TOTAL 29. 14 05240 COMPUTERLAND 39548 09/14/93 0101025813 08/13/93 201 .25 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-513000 AMT- 201 .25 DESC-MAINTENANCE-COMPAC M[ VENDOR TOTAL 201 .25 EQUIPMENT , INC 39549 09/14/92 0256769 Op/20/93 22 68 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-160000 AMT- 22.68 DESC-CORE BOND & BLUELINE 39549 09/14/93 0357693 08/30/93 11 .10 ACCOUNT AMT- 11 . 10 DESC-CORE BOND VENDOR TOTAL 33.78 C6000 COPY SALES 39550 09/14y93 010282 08/18/93 27.69 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-401000 ANT- 27.69 DESC-METER SERVICE SUPPLY VENDOR TOTAL 27.69 C6O25 COTTENS INC 39551 09/14y93 144664 08/26/93 30.44 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 ANT- 30.44 DESC-GASSHOCK FOR 4461 39551 09/14/93 144722 08/26/93 6.23 ��� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 ANT- 6.23 DESC-TEST INS �� �� VENDOR TOTAL 36.67 07080 CUES , INC. 39552 09/14/93 055518 08/19/93 18.99 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-123000 AMT- 18.99 DESC-SCREW CAP - #733 VENDOR TOTAL 18.99 D8500 DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE* 39553 09/14/93 143509 08/24/93 19.95 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-210000 ANT- 19.95 DESC-I .D. CHECKING GUIDE VENDOR TOTAL 19.95 E0100 EPA AUDIO VISUAL , INC. 39554 09y14/93 00082999 08y27/93 77.43 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-160000 ANT- 77.43 DESC-VIDEO TAPE � VENDOR TOTAL 77.43 E0300 EAST BETHEL LANDFILL 39555 09/14/93 08/08/93 50.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-354000 ANT- 50.00 DESC-TIMBERS FROM PARKS VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 E9020 ERICKSON'S NEWMARKET MARET 39556 09/14y93 08/23y93 S5. 15 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160130 AMT- 85. 15 DESC-MISC GROCERIES VENDOR TOTAL 85. 15 E9095 EXECUTONE 39557 09/14/93 76965 08/16/93 32.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-310000 AMT- 32.00 DESC-CHGD EXT #3016 VENDOR TOTAL 32.00 110 F1000 FALK PAPER COMPANY 39558 09/14/93 DI 139921 08/18/93 84.69 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-160000 ANT- 84.69 DESC-TOILET TISSUE . 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER 0-01 MOUNDS VIEN VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 84.69 F2000 FEED-RITE CONTROLS IN* 39559 09/14/93 20691 08/17/93 • 813.66 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 813.66 DESC-CHEMICALS • 39559 09/14/93 20356 08/11/93 252.37 • ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 252.37 DESC-COPPER SULFATE VENDOR TOTAL 1066.03 . • F3630 FIRST-TRUST CENTER 39560-0fy] 4/23 650401IIM01 88/17/7,0 067.70 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 590-4120-803000 AMT- 367.78 DESC-AGENT FEES VENDOR TOTAL 367. 78 F5900 FOUR BY FOUR SERVICE 39541 09/14/93 103192 09/02/93 48.33 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-512000 AMT- 48.33 DESC-REPLACE BANDS & ALI& VENDOR TOTAL 48.33 F6875 FRIDLEY , CITY OF 39562 09/14/93 09y14/93 467.68 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 28.35 DESC-SEWER BILL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 28.35 DESC-SEWER BILL • ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 28.35 DESC-SEWER BILL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 28.35 DESC-SEWER BILL IIACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 ANT- 41 .06 DESC-SEWER BILL ' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 28.35 DESC-SEWER BILL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 103.86 DESC-SEWER BILL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 ANT- 28.35 DESC-SEWER BILL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 28.35 DESC-SEWER BILL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 39.26 DESC-SEWER BILL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 28.35 DESC-SEWER BILL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121 -904000 AMT- 28.35 DESC-SEWER BILL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 28.35 DESC-SEWER BILL VENDOR TOTAL 467. 8 F6895 FRIENDLY CHEVROLET GE* 39564 09/14/93 206479 09y01 /93 61 .51 • ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 61 .51 DESC-ARM KIT 39564 09/14/93 206451 08/31y93 108.04 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 108.04 DESC-ARM KIT & ROD 39564 09/14/93 205738 08/20/93 23.39 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 ANT- 23.39 DESC-CYLINDER 39564 09/14/93 09/14/93 5.77 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 ANT- 5.77 DESC-CREDIT MISHANDLED VENDOR TOTAL 198.71 00040 G E CAPITAL CORPORATI* 39563 09/14y93 13037994 09/14/93 80.75 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-401000 ANT- 80.75 DESC-INSTALLMENT PAYMENT VENDOR TOTAL 80 . 75 0 0 & K SERVICES 39566 09/14/93 772749 09/01y93 123.21 ��� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-355000 ANT- 8.04 DESC-RAGS & TOWELS �~p ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-240000 AMT- 19.43 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL • ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-240000 AMT- 25.09 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL . 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER P410-01 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE • AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER_ 100-4360-240000 AMT- 23.83 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-240000 AMT- 22.98 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-240000 ANT- 23.34 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL 39566 09/14/93 769172 08/25/93 • 82.88 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-355000 ANT- 8.32 DESC-TOWELS & RAGS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-240000 ANT- 11 .31 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-240000 ANT- 16.96 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-240000 AMT- 15.71 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-1121-240000 AMT- 14.8� DE9C-UNIFORM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-240000 ANT- 15.72 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL 39566 09/14/93 765591 08/18/93 • 123.21 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-460-355000 AMT- 8.04 DESC-RAGS & TOWELS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-420-240000 AMT- 19.43 7iESC-UNIFORM RENTAL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-240000 AMT- 25.08 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-240000 AMT- 23.83 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121 -240000 AMT- 22.99 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-240000 ANT- 23.84 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL VENDOR TOTAL 329.30 G0545 GALLAGHERS SERVICE IN* 39568 09/14/93 09/14y93 123. 18 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-353000 AMT- 123. 18 DESC-REFUSE COLLECTION - 410 VENDOR TOTAL 123. 18 G2112 GENE'S WATER & SEWER, * 39569 09/14/93 09/14/93 '450.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-2305-000000 ANT- 450.00 DESC-REFUND OF DEPOSIT-83' VENDOR TOTAL 450.00 03000 ART GOEBEL FORD 39570 09/14/93 143489 08y04/93 21 .56 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260- 122000 AMT- 21 .56 DESC-LAMP - #501 VENDOR TOTAL 21 .56 05940 GOVERNMENT TRAINING S* 39571 09/14/93 1983 08/17/93 4041 .73 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-343301 AMT- • 125.00 DESC-PRINTED MATERIALS FO ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-303301 AMT- 3916.73 DESC-CONSULTANTS TIME & E. VENDOR TOTAL 4041 .73 H0586 HARMON GLASS 39572 09/14/93 210034219 08/26/93 265-.52 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 ANT- 265.52 DESC-WINDSHIELD - #462 39572 09/14/93 210034222 08/26/93 35.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-513000 ANT- 35.00 DESC-WINDSHIELD REPAIR 39572 09y14/93 210034220 08y26/93 223.49 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-513000 ANT- 223.49 DESC-WINDSHIELD VENDOR TOTAL 524,01 K5470 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDI* 39573 09/14/93 0220-033134 08/18/93 32.95 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 ANT- 32.95 DESC-SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL 32.95 ���� K��" 8 KRECH'S OFFICE MACHIN* 39574 09y14/93 21997 08/27/93 97.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-511000 AMT- 97.50 DESC-COMPUTER REPAIR 7: , 8 ACCOUNTS PAH YABLE CECK �ER REGIS10-01 MOUNDS VIEW OR CHECK CHECK INVOICE IN-OICE �lf, VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 97.50 L0245 LMCIT 39575 09/14/93 09/01/93 161 .93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 AMT- 161 .93 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SEF VENDOR TOTAL 161 .93 L0500 LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER * 39576 09/14/93 09y14/93 60.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-363000 AMT- 60.00 DESC-AM W/DISABLTS ACT SMT VENDOR TOTAL 60.00 L3545 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSP* 39577 09/14/93 68993 08/26/93 64.25 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-341000 AMT- 55.97 DESC-LEGAL PUBLICATIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 770-4121 -303AMT- 8.28 DESC-LEGAL PUBLICATIONS VENDOR TOTAL 64.25 M0300 M R P A 39578 09/14/93 001127 08/27/93 12.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-363000 AMT- 12.00 DESC-WORKSHOP REG. - SAARI� VENDOR TOTAL 12.01 , M0320 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO 39579 09/14/93 366890 08/31/93 8.56 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-123000 AMT- 8.56 DESC-BRAKE CABLE � ����� 39579 09/14/93 363112 08/18/93 21 .25 � ��' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 21 .25 DESC-MISC PART VENDOR TOTAL 29.81 M0480 MAIN MOTORS CHEV CADI* 39580 09/14/93 131623 08/30/93 18.99 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 ANT- 18 99 DESC-HTR PKG - #921 . VENDOR TOTAL 18 .99 M0750 MASYS CORPORATION 3,7,581 09/14/93 5407 09/01/93 724.20 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-513000 AMT- 724 .20 DESC-MAINTENANCE - SOFTWAl VENDOR TOTAL 724.20 M0760 MATCO TOOLS 39582 09/14/93 21895 09y02/93 62.20 , C__, % ._. _ . __ _ ,_ _ 2.2: ^ -C;-. -"r 2 '!' ' ` ::`-2 2i2 ' VENDOR TOTAL 62.20 M2170 METRO WASTE CONTROL C* 39583 09y14/93 51321093 09/01/93 46527.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-323000 AMT- 46527.00 DESC-OCTOBER SEWER SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 46527.00 M3442 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPO* 3p584 09/14y93 10986 08/17/93 1 .63 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 1 .43 DESC-DUMP CHARGE 39584 09/14/93 11370 08/30/93 28.01 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 ANT- 28.01 DESC-MATERIALS + DUMP CHG� VENDOR TOTAL 29.64 MillV MIDWEST SPECIALTY SAL* 39585 09/14/93 2940 08/13/93 42.28 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 42.28 DESC-SEAL,BEARING CONE-CU; 39585 09/14/93 3005 08/19/93 55.40 . P 9 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER A - MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE • AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 ANT- 55.40 DESC-TIRE VENDOR TOTAL 97.68 M3980 MINNESOTA CONWAY 39586 09/14/93 192942 08/27/93 64.65 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 10074260-123000 AMT- 64.65 DESC-FIRE EXTINGUISHER SUF VENDOR TOTAL 64.65 N0500 NYSCA 39587 09/14/93 • 09/14/93 285.00 ACCOUNT � �- �- 25C-' 351-1600()8 ANT- 285. 00 DESC-xrA rFRTIETr4ZIONL��� VENDOR TOTAL 285.00 N3425 NORTH CENTRAL ELEVATO* 39588 09/14/93 7041 08/25/93 47.35 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-401000 AMT- 47.35 DESC-AUGUST SERVICE CONTR' VENDOR TOTAL 47.35 N3500 NORTH LEXINGTON LANDS* 3958909/14/93 357 08y20/93 4.53 ACCOUNTNUMBER- 100-4360-160000 ANT- 4.53 DESC-5 YDS TURF MATERIAL VENDOR TOTAL 4.53 N3690 NORTH STAR TURF , INC 39590 09/14/93 584230 08/16/93 293.94 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 293.94 DESC-ROUND-UP 2.5 GALLONS VENDOR TOTAL 293.94 S N4000. NORTHERN SANITARY SUP* 39591 09/14/93 261522 03/23/93 17.89 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-160000 AMT- 17.89 DESC-SPRAYER & BOTTLE VENDOR TOTAL 17.89 N4200 NORTHERN STATES POWER* 39592 09/14/93 • 09/14/93 4019 .69 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- 3146.82 DESC-2401 HWY 10 - WELL # ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121 -321000 ANT- 61 .89 DESC-7545 GROVELAND RD ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- 715.79 DESC-2450 BRONSON DR - 20- ACCOUNT OACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-321000 ANT- 82.44 DESC-1699-79TH AVE - BEAC| ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-321000 AMT- 12. 75 DESC-7840 PLEASANTVIEW DR 39592 09/14/93 09/14/93 14553 21::-�.` . ." 3:-.7, . .:; . 20: 02! :::O : `� 2 . 11 _ .7cr-2P" 5 ^Tnu^ `'/E - c."=-TP' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-321000 AMT- 6.48 DESC-2271 CTY RD U W - SI: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 25.94 DESC-2752 WOODCREST - PK : ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 7.39 DESC-2764 ARDAN AVE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 19.60 DESC-5214 LONG LAKE ROAD-F ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-322000 AMT- 15.78 DESC-5214 LONG LAKE ROAD- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- 53.80 DESC-5100 LONG LAKE ROAD ACCOUNT NUMBER- 770-4121-324000 ANT- 13. 13 DESC-5472 ADAMS ST VENDOR TOTAL 4165.22 N4201 NORTHERN STATES POWER 39594 09/14/93 09/14/93 3728.69 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 770-4121-324000 AMT- 3728.69 DESC-STREET LIGHTING VENDOR TOTAL 3728.69 III N4210 NORTHERN WELDING & BO* 39595 09/14/93 7094 08/30/93 114.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 114.00 DESC-MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 10 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER AirMOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 114.00 P0580 PAPER PRODUCTS PLUS 39596 O9/14/93 19827 O9/01/93 19.65 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 19 .65 DESC-RECEPTION VENDOR TOTAL 19,65 P0700 PARTS PLUS 39597 09/14/93 2-329777 08/25/93 59.47 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 59.47 DESC-M C ASSY & BRAKE SHOE 39597 2-331f%4 09/-01/92 57,34 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 57.64 DESC-TRUCK SHOCKS VENDOR TOTAL 117. 11 P6870 PRINT CENTRAL 39598 09/14/93 70803 08/04/93 35.04 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-160301 AMT- 35.04 DESC-200 FLYERS VENDOR TOTAL 35.04 R7200 RUFF - CUT 39599 09/14/93 93162 0:3/27/93 250.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 ANT- 250.00 DESC-CUTTING WEEDS THROUGi VENDOR TOTAL 250.O0 S010 0 S & N COMPANY 39600 09/14/93 5783505 08/25/93 107.73 flo ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122O00 AMT- 107.73 DESC-TIRES 39600 09y14/93 0009621 07y27/93 55.70- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 55. 70- DESC-GOV'T SALES CREDIT VENDOR TOTAL 52.03 S0650 ST. PAUL BOOK & STATI* 39601 09/14/93 177825 07/19/93 5.73 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-160213 ANT- 5.73 DESC-CONSTRUCTION PAPER VENDOR TOTAL 5.73 50888 DONALD SALVERDA & ASS* 39602 09/14/93 P-8665-11 08/26/93 715.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-363000 ANT- 715.00 DE-BC-EFFECTIVE MONT PROGR/ VENDOR TOTAL 715,00 s C 3:73:3'% ��, � ,'�� ' ���� ��'-`/ �� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-160000 ANT- 9.77 DESC-PHOTOS 39603 09/14y93 110315 08/23/93 84.68 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-160000 AMT- 84.68 DESC-FILM 39603 09/14/93 08/23/93 7.42 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160130 AMT- 3.72 DESC-AUDIO CASSETTE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160024 AMT- 3.70 DESC-AUDIO CASSETTE 39603 09/14/93 110320 09y02/93 . 21 .92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-160000 AMT- 21 .92 DESC-FILM 39603 09/14/93 110319 09/01/93 10.64 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 1O.64 DESC-SCRAPBOOK 39603 09/14y93 110318 08y26/93 11 .70 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-160000 AMT- 11 .70 DESC-FILM ��� VENDOR TOTAL 146. 13 �� S6201 SPRING LAKE PARK REC * 39604 09/14y93 640 08/20/93 210.96 . . )1/i11 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER 10-01 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT ' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160028 ANT- 210.96 DESC-SHARED WATER CARNIVAL VENDOR TOTAL • 210.96 S6300 SPRING LAKE PARK LUMB* 39605 09/14/93 102141 08/10/93 3.24 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 ANT- 3.24 DESC-ROUGH SAWN CEDAR 39605 09/14/93 102137 08/10/93 18.51 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 ANT- 18.51 DESC-ROUGH SAWN CEDAR 39605 09/14/93 102524 • 08y06/93 122.05 ACCOUNT NUMBER- - 100--- 000 AMT- 122.05 D[3C FIR CTRIPC - OIL DUn 39605 '09/14/93 102101 08/06/93 46.33 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 ANT- 46.33 DESC-CONCRETE MIX 39605. 09/14/93 101547 07/28/93 6.48 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 6.48 DESC-ROUGH SAWN CEDAR 39605 09/14/93 101503 07/28/93 10.81 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 ANT- 10.81 DESC-SILICONE CAULK-OIL DL 39605 09/14/93 101497 07/28y93 47.29 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 47.29 DESC-ROOFING,SHINGLES ,SILi 39605 09/14/93 101476 07/28/93 27.90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 ANT- 27.90 DESC-ROUGH SAWN CEDAR-OIL 39605 09/14/93 101106 07/28/93 171 .36 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 171 .36 DESC-ROUGH SAWN CEDAR,BIT� 110 VENDOR TOTAL 453.97 S6900 STATE TREASURER 39607 09/14/93 F 34226 08/01y93 11 .50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 11 .50 DESC-DISKS, CUTTER, & WAC� • VENDOR TOTAL 11 .50 37400 STREICHER'S PROF . POL* 39608 09/14/93 IN.70335. 1 08/06y93 103.84 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-480000 ANT- 103.84 DESC-SPOTLIGHTS - . 1992 CAF VENDOR TOTAL 103.84 U0400 U S WEST 39609 09/14/93 09/14/93 1503.25 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-310000 AMT- 1174.57 DESC-784-3055 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-318000 AMT- 50. 15 DESC-784-9871 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-310000 AMT- 34. 13 DESC-784-4349 G001122 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-310000 ANT- 21 .28 DESC-784-1076 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-310000 AMT- 20.90 DESC-784-1305 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121 -310000 AMT- 51 .79 DESC-784-9947 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-310000 ANT- 55.66 DESC-785-0950 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-310000 AMT- 37.57 DESC-783-1326 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-310000 AMT- 37.20 DESC-783-1307 VENDOR TOTAL 1503.25 U3000 UNIFORM UNLIMITED 39610 09/14/93 416330 08/17/93 495.00 • ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-240000 ANT- 495.00 DESC-BODY ARMOR VEST-BAUM[ 39610 09/14/93 416727 08/20/93 990.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-240000 ANT- 495.00 DESC-BODY ARMOR VEST-KOOP! �1, ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-240000 AMT- 495.00 DESC-BODY ARMOR VEST-SILH VENDOR TOTAL 1485.00 , 7. • 7 • 12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER 01 MOUNDS VIEW I VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT V2200 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL* 39611 09/14/93 233988-9308 08/27/93 29 .00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 29 .00 DESC-OIL FILTER BARREL VENDOR TOTAL 29.00 V66O0 VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY * 39612 09/14/93 227955 08y19/93 174. 15 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 174. 15 DESC-MISC PARTS 39612 09/14/93 227956 08/19/93 4.20- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 4.20- DESC-RETURN BULBS VEN W0700 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BL* 39613 09/14/93 334804 08/23/93 785.79 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-353000 AMT- 122.41 DESC-REFUSE COLLECTION - ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-353000 AMT- 221 . 13 DESC-REFUSE COLLECTION - ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-354000 AMT- 442.25 DESC-REFUSE COLLECTION - VENDOR TOTAL 785.79 W1000 WATERPRO 39614 09y14/93 486460 08/24/93 460.34 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-703000 AMT- 460.34 BESC-2" TURBO GEN MOTOR VENDOR TOTAL 460.34 0 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC * 39615 09/14/93 484764 08/13/93 33.84 ��� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 33.84 DESC-SUMP BASIN � �� VENDOR TOTAL 33.84 GRAND TOTAL 75280.02 � . Ali 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REO 10-02 . MOUNDS VTEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT • W1919 WESTERN BANK 38615 08/19/93 08/19/93 72781 . 13 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-010000 AMT- 4423 .09 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-020301 AMT- 280.00 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-010000 AMT- 4140 .32 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT mUMBER- 100-4180-010000 AMT- 4002.65 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-020000 AMY- 340.00 DESC-SROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-010000 AMT- 1508.48 DESC-GROSS -8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-020000 AMT- 1262. 10 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT-NUMDER- 100 4200 +010000 ANT 26241 .93 D[CC CROCS-8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-011000 AMT- 151 .75 DESC-GROSS 8y19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-020000 AMT- 521 .64 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-010000 AMT- 491 .85 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-020000 AMT- 422.40 DESC-GROSS 8/19y93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-010000 AMT- 1178.40 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER-_ 100-4270-010000 ANT- 2968.03 DESC-GROSS 8/19y93 • ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-011000 AMT- 397.71 DESC-GROSS 8/19y93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-010000 ANT- 3559.65 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-010000 AMT- 2333.60 DESC-SROSS 8/19/93 • ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-011000 AMT- 125.75 DESC-3ROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-020000 ANT- 2251 .50 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020260 ANT- 252.66 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 411ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020018 AMT- 262.50 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 F ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020038 AMT- 20.00 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 • ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020040 AMT- 760.00 DESC-GROSS 8/19y93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020260 AMT- 252.66 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-020260 ANT- 252.66 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020229 AMT- 77.00 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020231 AMT- 35.00 DESC-GROSS 8/19y93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020233 AMT- 154.00 DESC-OROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020237 AMT- 70.00 DESC-OROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020238 • AMT- 7.00 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020239 AMT- 14.00 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020241 ANT- 42.00 :ESC-GROSS 8/19/93 � ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020253 AMT- 119.00 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 H.���." ' *�,.���- ���-���. -������ ��.�- 7� . � , �`--� ����� �/ ��/�� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020256 AMT- 84.00 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020260 AMT- 252.66 DESC-DROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-020000 AMT- 1104.75 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-020000 AMT- 448.40 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-010000 AMT- 838.58 DESC-GROSS 8y19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-010000 AMT- 1911 .44 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-010000 AMT- 2760.00 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-011000 ANT- 238.48 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-020000 AMT- 1030.25 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-010000 AMT- 1911 .44 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-010000 AMT- 2736.80 DESC-GROSS 8/19y93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-020000 ANT- 468.00 DESC-GROSS 8/19/93 ���� VENDOR TOTAL 72781 . 13 P7900 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 38616 08/19/93 08/19/93 4808.51 . AMOUNP 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REG 10-02 DS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME • NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-033000 AMT- 198. 16 DESC-PENS IONS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-033000 AMT- 185.48 DECO-PENS I ONE 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-033000 AMT- 178. 10 :E,. :- : : :-,: O,'19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-033000 AMT- 67 .58 DESC-PENS IONS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-033000 AMT- 76.72 DESC-PENS IONS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-034000 AMT- 2964.52 DESC-PENS IONS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-034000 AMT- 59.02 DECO-PENS I O : 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-033000 ANT- 18.92 DESC-PENS IONS 8/19/93 ACCOUk'`' . - .6-7,- ^�:,- -2.i.}' :3331::: AMT' Z2. '7 ^ O- 'L • - :` C C/� /�0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-033000 ANT- 150.79 DESC-PENS IONS 8/19y93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-033000 AMT- 157.53 0550-PENS I ONE 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-033000 AMT- 109.96 CESC-PENS S.ONE 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-033000 AMT- 11 .32 DESC-PENS IONS 8y19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-033000 AMT- 11 .32 DESC-PENS IDNS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-033000 ANT- 11 .32 DESC-PENS IDNS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-033000 AMT- 11 .32 DESC-PENS IDNS 8y19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-033000 AMT- 19.01 DESC-PENS IONS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121 -033000 AMT- 33.89 DECO-PENS I ONE 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-032000 ANT- 53.69 DESC-PENSIONS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-033000 AMT- 63.21 DESC-PENS IDNS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-033000 AMT- 134.34 DESC-PENS IONS 8/19/93 S ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-412O-032000 AMT- 53.70 DESC-PBNSIONS 8/19ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-033000 AMT- 63.22 DESC-PENS IONS 8/19/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121 -033000 AMT- 122.60 DESC-PENS IONS 8/19/93 VENDOR TOTAL 4808.51 W1919 WESTERN BANK 38617 08/19/93 • 08/19/93 3478.54 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-030000 AMT- 291 .59 DESC-8/20 - F ICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-030000 AMT- 239.59 DESC-8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-030000 AMT- 257.87 DESC-8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-030000 AMT- 171 .79 DESC-8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-030000 AMT- 161 .48 DESC-8/20 - F ICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-030000 AMT- 21 .42 DESC-8/2O - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-030000 AMT- 69.99 DESC-8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-030000 AMT- 183. 17 DESC-8/2O - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-030000 AMT- 200.04 DESC-8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER~ 100-4360-030000 AMT- 284.88 DESC-8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-030000 . AMT- 80.30 DESC-8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-030000 AMT- 15.66 DESC-8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250_4353-030000 ANT- 15.66 DESC-8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-030000 AMT- 57.77 DEED-8/2O - FICA • ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-030000 AMT- 68.49 DESC_8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-030000 ANT- 27 .80 DESC-8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4121-030000 ANT- 51 .92 DESC-8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-030000 AMT_ 72.96 DESC-8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-030000 AMT- 241 . 48 OESC-8/20 - FICA 411ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-030000 AMT- 72.96 DESC-8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- • 730-4121-030000 ANT- 193.48 DESC-8/20 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-031000 AMT- 68. 19 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE •ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-031000 AMT- 56.03 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE . • ' 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK RE,..: �0-02 MOUNDS VIEW V��]OR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-031000 AMT- 60.31 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-031000 AMT- 40. 18 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-031000 AMT- 83.30 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-031000 ANT- 5.01 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-031000 AMT- 16.37 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-031000 AMT- 43.31 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-031000 AMT- • 46.78 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-031000 AMT- 66.62 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 230-4351-031000 • AMT- 16.78 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-031000 ANT- 3666 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-031000 AMT- 3.66 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-031000 AMT- 13.52 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER:- 255-4121-031000 AMT- 16.02 DESC-8/20 . - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-031000 AMT- 6.50 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-031000 ANT- 12. 15 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-031000 AMT- 17.06 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-031000 AMT- 56.48 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-031000 AMT- 17 .06 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-031000 AMT- 45.25 DESC-8/20 - MEDICARE VENDOR TOTAL • 3478.54 M���'0 MOUNDS VIEW ANIMAL HO* 38618 08/19/93 08/19/93 40.00 � r �� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-353213 ANT- 40.00 DESC-REFUND FOR MISSED AD VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 36305 STAGETIME PRODUCTIONS ' 38619 08/19/92 08/19/93 62.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160107 AMT- 62.50 DESC-ADDT'L TICKETS-"FORE' VENDOR TOTAL 62.50 . 80040 SCCU - VISA 38620 08/20/93 08/18/93 91 .00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-303000 ANT- 91 .00 DESC-LUNCHEON WITH MULTIr. VENDOR TOTAL 91 .00 P5960 POSTAGE BY PHONE SYST* 38621 08/23/93 08/23/93 2000.00 A..�[j' .�T :' ,.J1 .B.Eil,,- 100- -3200 A/. 1.- �:_ } ,.00 DESL7r~�� /i;GE FLR oj,tan'Iw7 VENDOR TOTAL 2000.00 . V2000 VAN - 0 - LITE 38622 08/23/93 59721 08y23/93 2.02 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-511000 ANT- 2.02 DESC-ADJ FOR SALES TAX VENDOR TOTAL2.02 H0586 HARMON GLASS 38623 08/23/93 210033632 08y23/93 22.93 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-480000 ANT- 22.93 DESC-ADJ FOR SALES TAX VENDOR TOTAL 22.93 B215O BITUMINOUS CONSULTING* 38624 08/24/93 3600 08/24/93 21766.87 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-705000 ANT- 21766 .87 DESC-SILVER VIEW PARK PA ��� T� VENDOR TOTAL 21766.87 ��- M4177 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAF* 38625 08y24/93 08y24/93 20.00 4 ACCCUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK RES 111,10-02 MOUNDS VIEW E,1DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 1O0-4200-363000 AMT- 20.00 DESC-NETWORK & SYSTEM CONF VENDOR TOTAL 20.00 38100 SUBWAY 38626 08/24/93 08/24/93 24.86 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4140-114000 AMT- 24.84 DESC-LUNCH FOR ELECTION J\ VENDOR TOTAL 24.86 B2040 BEL-RAE BALLROOM, INC* 38627 08/25/93 08/25y93 300.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER 100 4140-30300O AMT DECC RENTAL FOR SPECIAL E�-- VENDOR TOTAL 300.O0 L3580 LIME, SHARON 38628 08/25/93 08/25/93 19.66 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-160000 AMT- 19.66 DESC-COMM, MEETINC? SROUP VENDOR TOTAL 19.66 A0008 AARP 38629 08/26/93 08/26/93 240.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160130 ANT- 240,00 DESC-"55 ALIVE" - AUG 24 VENDOR TOTAL 240.00 18201 CLEMSON UN.: VERSITY 38630 08/26/93 08/26/93 330.O0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-363000 AMT- 165.00 DESC-"PROF. DEV. " CONF - SACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-363000 AMT- 165.00 DESC-"PROF. DEV . " CONF -VENDOR TOTAL 330.00 -1430O MINNESOTA GFOA 38631 08/26/93 08/26y93 175.O0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-363000 ANT - 175.00 DESC-ANNUAL MN GFOA CONF VENDOR TOTAL 175.O0 R0429 RADISSON ARROWWOOD 38632 08/26/93 08/26/93 230.04 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-363000 AMT- 230.04 DESC-ANNUAL MN GFOA CONF VENDOR TOTAL 230.04 22500 ZEDS INTERNATIONAL 38633 08/10/93 29015 08/10y93 2864.85 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-703000 AMT- 2864.85 DESC-COMRUTEF & MONITOR-F' VENDOR TOTAL 2864.85 38300 IRONDALE HUDDLE CLUB 38634 08/27y93 08y27/93 805.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-330000 AMT- 402.50 DESC-DELIVERY OF. SEPT/OCT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-330000 ANT- 402 .50 DESC-DELIVERY OF SEPT/OCT VENDOR TOTAL 805.00 A4998 AMERICAN NATIONAL BAN* 38635 08/30y93 08/30/93 1053.73 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 580-4120-803000 ANT- 188.99 DESC-AOENT FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 591-4120-803000 AMT- 243.37 DESC-AGENT FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 593-4120-803000 ANT- 181 .27 DESC-AGENT FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 597-4120-803000 AMT- 190.56 DESC-AGENT FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 599-4120-803000 AMT- 249.54 DESC-AGENT FEE VENDOR TOTAL 1053.73 L0525 LAKE RESTORATION, INC 38636 09/01/93 09/01/93 1637.00 cit5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REG 0-02 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE • NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-303000 ANT- 1637.00 DESC-WEED CTRL TRTMT-SILVE . VENDOR TOTAL 1637.00 W1919 WESTERN BANK 38637 09/02/93 09/02/93 72591 .79 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-010000 ANT- 1925.00 DEED-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-010000 AMT- 4423.09 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-020301 AMT- 280.00 DEED-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 10074140-020000 AMT- 365.00 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER_ 100-4150-o1cycrX) AMT- 417'6. 17--Deac'-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-010000 AMT- 3975.43 DEED-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-020000 ANT- 340.00 DEED-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-010000 AMT- 1508.49 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-020000 AMT- 929.60 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-010000 AMT- 26180.36 DESC-OROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-011000 AMT- 592.97 DESC-GROSS - 9y03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-020000 AMT- 521 .64 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-010000 ANT- 491 .85 DEED-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-020000 AMT- 422. 40 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-010000 ANT- 1178.40 DEED-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-010000 AMT- 2960.03 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-011000 AMT- 154.67 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ��� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-010000 ANT- 3516.22 DESC-GROSS - 9y03 ��� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-020000 AMT- 144.00 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-010000 AMT- 2333.60 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-011000 AMT- 91 .53 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-020000 AMT- 2116.25 ]ESC-OROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020260 AMT- 252. 66 DESC-OROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020260 AMT_ 252.66 ]ESC-OROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-020260 AMT- 252.66 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020233 ANT- 14.00 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020238 AMT- 7,00 DEED-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020241 ANT- 7.00 DEED-OROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020253 AMT- 7J00 DEED-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020255 AMT- 7.00 DEED-GROSS - 9/03 Hi:LUUN\ NUMBE - 2o0-4Jt4-0�0260 AM | - �t.1 .66 UE!liU-LiHULT6 - Y/VJ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-020000 AMT- 887.25 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-020000 AMT- 687.82 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-010000 AMT- 756.65 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-010000 AMT- 1929.37 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-010000 AMT- 2760.00 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-011000 ANT- 194.94 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-020000 ANT- 510.25 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-010000 ANT- 1929.37 DEED-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-010000 ANT- 2736.80 DEED-GROSS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-020000 ANT- 520.00 DESC-GROSS - 9/03 VENDOR TOTAL 72591 .79 4110 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 38638 09/02/93 09/02/93 4850 .29 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-033000 AMT- 198. 16 DEED-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-033000 AMT- 185.48 DEED-PENSIONS - 9/03 � • . PAnF 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID �HECK REG 0-02 MOUNDS V�EW V���OR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-033000 AMT- 178.09 DESC-PENSIONS - 9y03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-033000 AMT- 67.58 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-033000 AMT- 74.33 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-034000 AMT- 3023.87 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-034000 AMT- 59.02 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-033000 AMT- 18.92 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-420-033000 AMT- 52.78 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- • 100-4270-033000 AMT- 139.54 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-1350-083000 ANT- 157.53 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/02 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-033000 AMT- 107.99 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-033000 AMT- 11 .32 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-033000 AMT- 11 .32 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-033000 AMT- 11 .32 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-033000 AMT- 11 .32 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-033000 AMT- 19.01 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121 -033000 AMT- 33.90 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-033000 • AMT- 63.21 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-032000 AMT- 53.70 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-033000 AMT- 132.38 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-032000 AMT- 53.70 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-033000 AMT- 63.21 DESC-PENSIONS - 9y03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121 -033000 AMT- 122.61 DESC-PENSIONS - 9/03 �N�' VENDOR TOTAL 4850.29 W1919 WESTERN BANK 38639 09/02/93 09/02/93 3314.22 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-030000 AMT- 23.25 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-0300()0 ANT- 291 .59 DESC-9/03/93 7 FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4140-030000 ANT- 22.64 DESC-9y03y93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-030000 AMT.=. 238.64 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-030000 AMT- 256. 19 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-030000 AMT- 151 . 17 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-030000 AMT- 154.43 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-030000 NiA21 .42 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-030000 ANT- 69.99 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMD[R 100 4270 000000 AMT 16'7.�,0 D[CC 9/00/90 FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-030000 AMT- 206.28 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 160-4360-030000 AMT- 273. 18 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-030000 AMT- 15.66 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-030000 AMT- 15.66 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-030000 AMT- 15.66 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-030000 • AMT- 18.28 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-030000 ANT- 55.01 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-030000 ANT- 42.64 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-030000 ANT- 46.84 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-030000 ANT- 74.07 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-030000 AMT- 204.95 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA 411 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-030000 AMT- 74.07 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-030000 AMT- 193.91 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-031000 AMT- 22.48 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-031000 AMT- 68. 19 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA . 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REEL10-02 MOUNDS VIEW VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4140-031000 AMT- 5.30 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-031000 AMT- 55.81 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-031000 AMT- 59 .92 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- • 100-4190-031000 AMT- 35 .36 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-031000 AMT- 81 .86 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-031000 AMT- 5.01 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-031000 AMT- 16.38 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-031000 ANT- 39.66 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA P-1.� ` ` 'LT.`- 1 :.:.::.- ' =-;13 C :: ' � 3/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-031000 ANT- 63.89 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-031000 AMT- 3.66 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-031000 AMT- 3.66 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-031000 ANT- 3.66 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-031000 AMT- 4.29 DESC-9/03/93 _ FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-031000 AMT- 12 .87 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ANT- 9 96 DESC-9/03/93 FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-031000 . - - ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-031000 ANT- 10.96 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-031000 AMT- 17.32 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-031000 ANT- 47.94 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-031000 ANT- 17.32 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-031000 AMT- 45.35 DESC-9/03/93 - FICA 1��1 VENDOR TOTAL 3314.22 _ 06970 GROUP HEALTH PLAN , IN* 38640 09/02/93 09/02/93 9508.65 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-040000 ANT- 145.68 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - =- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-040000 AMT- 470.32 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SE- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-040000 AMT- 745.74 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-040000 AMT- 443 .98 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-040000 AMT- 218.52 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-040000 ANT- 298.30 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SEF ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 ANT- 3542.33 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-040000 AMT- 698.02 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SE� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-040000 AMT- 74.58 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SE' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-040000 ANT- 742.28 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SEJ *CcUUN ! NUMBEH- 100-4360-040000 AMT- 298.30 DECO HEALTH INC m[M - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-040000 AMT- 395.01 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SE� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-040000 AMT- 596.60 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SE', ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-040000 AMT- 395.01 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SEF ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-040000 AMT- 443.98 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SEF VENDOR TOTAL 9508.65 M2020 MEDICA 38641 09/02/93 09y02y93 1234. 10 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-040000 ANT- • 187. 16 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - =- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-040000 AMT- 149.72 DESC-HEALTH INSPREM - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-040000 ANT- 224.60 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SE� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 AMT- 374.32 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - = ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-436O-040000 AMT- 298.30 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SE� ��� VENDOR TOTAL 1234. 10 ��� M2000 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLA* 38642 09/02/93 09/02/93 739 .00 . 8 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK RED 10-02 MCUNDS VIEW VFwnOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE • AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-040000 AMT- 146.90- DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 AMT- 293.80 DESC-HEALTH IHS PREM - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-040000 AMT- 149 . 15 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-040000 AMT- 149. 15 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - SE VENDOR TOTAL 739.00 06970 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, IN* 38643 09y02/93 09/02/93 315.90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-042000 ANT- 60 .95 DESC-DENTAL INS PREM - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-042000 AMT- 14.33 DESC-DENTAL INS MEM - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-042000 ANT- 43.65 DEBT-DENTAL INS PREM - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-042000 AMT- 9.70 DESC-DENTAL INS PREM - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-042000 AMT- • 148.25 DESC-DENTAL INS PREM - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-042000 AMT- 19.40 DESC-DENTAL INS PREM - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-042000 AMT- 9.70 DEBT-DENTAL INS PREM - SE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-042000 AMT- 9.70 DESC-DENTAL INS PREM - SE VENDOR TOTAL 315.90 C5700 COMMERICAL LIFE INSUR* 38644 09/02/93 09/02/93 388.65 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-041000 AMT- 1 .70 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-041000 AMT- 45.95 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-041000 AMT- 2.05 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-041000 AMT- 4.25 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-041000 AMT- 30.95 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-041000 AMT- 54.65 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4250-041000 ANT- 1 .70 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-041000 AMT- 121 .23 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-041000 ANT- 3.98 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-041000 ANT- .42 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-041000 ANT- 5. 10 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-041000 ANT- 3.40 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-041000 AMT- 42 .89 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-041000 AMT- 4.25 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT - 730-4121-041000 ANT- 23. 25 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-041000 AMT- 42.88 DESC-LIFE INS PREM - SEPT • VENDOR TOTAL 388.65 08200 MORGAN, LYNNETTE 38645 09/01/93 09/01y93 33.76 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 ANT- 33.76 DESC-RECEPTION-TRUCE VENDOR TOTAL 33.76 39117 DISNEY'S CARRIBEAN BE* 38646 09/02/93 09/02/93 109. 14 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-363000 ANT- 109. 14 DE~ -ROOM DEPOSIT-NLC CON VENDOR TOTAL 109. 14 U2750 ULRICH, MICHAEL 38647 09/02/93 09/02/93 303.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-363000 ANT- 303.00 DESC-CONFERENCE/PHOENIX-L VENDOR TOTAL 303.00 4~1 P79O0 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 38649 09/03/93 09/03/93 77.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-035000 ANT- 77.50 DESC-DEFINED CONTRIBUTION 41119ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAlD CHECK REG 10-02 MOUNDS VIEW VOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 77.50 92505 MN DEPT OF NATURAL RE* 3S650 09/02/93 09/02y93 265.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4450-160000 AMT- 265.00 DESC-TREES VENDOR TOTAL 265.00 39116 GUSTAFSON, LEE 38648 09/02/93 09/02/93 50.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-353208 AMT- 50.00 DESC-REFUND V[NDOn TOTAL 50.00 GRAND TOTAL 206534.64 ,.,,,.. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 1, Report Number. 93-614C 111 a Report Date: 9-8-93 STAFF REPORT Counc�I Action: 0 Special Order of Business September 13, 1993 0 Public Hearings CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE P Consent Agenda lip 0 Council Business Item Description: Award Bid to Bacon's Electric for $2,900.00 to be Transferred from Contingency Account No. 100-4500-910 to Account No 100-4190-121 Administrator's Review/Recommendation: i - No comments to supplement this rep - Comments attached. Explanation/Summar7 (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) STTMMARY; • Staff received bids on the City Hall entrance lighting revision. The bids are as follows : Bacons Electric $2 , 900 . 00 Gopher Electric $2 , 919 . 00 Staff recommends award to Bacons Electric at the bid price of $2 , 900 . 00 . • • • • i . :---"--"1 --. • I Mic aoel Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor RECOMMENDATION: • 411 Award bid to Bacons Electric for $2 , 900 . 00 to be transfered from contingency account no . 100-4500-910 to account no. 100-4190-121 . Agenda;)ec::ion: 7•C MIXES ntr REQUEST FOR COUNCIL. CONSIDERATION port Number. 93-614C STAFF REPORT Report Date: 9-8-93 • �� Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE September 13, 1993 ❑ Public Hearings t Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Award Bid to Bacon's Electric for $2,900.00 to be Transferred from Contingency Account No. 100-4500-910 to Account No 100-4190-121 Administrators Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this rep - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) UMMARY; • Staff received bids on the City Hall entrance lighting revision. The bids are as follows : Bacons Electric $2, 900 . 00 Gopher Electric $2, 919 . 00 Staff recommends award to Bacons Electric at the bid price of $2, 900 . 00 . • • 1°:94-11 . Mic _-1 Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor • RECOMMENDATION: • i Award bid to Bacons Electric for $2, 900 . 00 to be transfered from contingency account no. 100-4500-910 to account no. 100-4190-121 . ,s. -, REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda section: 93F ,J,,hCA ReportNumber. 93-620C STAFF REPORT Report Date: 9-8-93 "gig Council Action: 0 Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE September 13, 1993 0 Public Hearings Zl Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Consideration of Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement for the Fire Training Association I Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. SUMMARY; The City is part of a Joint Powers Agreement with the cities of Blaine, Fridley, Spring Lake Park, Brooklyn Center and, until recently, the City of Columbia Heights, to participate in the construction and operation of a future fire training facility. The City entered into the agreement in December, 1990. The City of Columbia Heights has opted out of the Joint Powers Agreement, thereby necessitating the need to amend the Joint Powers Agreement. The attached amendment to the existing agreement deletes Columbia Heights name from the Agreement a. - . =nds the amount that the remaining cities are assigned for constr ction should the facility become a reality. • • Aigillik / , ---- ------- I ,i • a Orduno, City Administrator • RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Attached Amendment to the Existing Agreement by deleting Columbia Heights Name from the Agreement and Amend the Amount that the Remaining Cities are Assigned for Construction should the facility become a reality. AMENDMENT OF JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF FIRE TRAINING SITE WHEREAS, the parties who are signators below had entered into an agreement titled "Joint Powers Agreement - Fire Training Association", a copy of which is attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the only expenditure of funds to date pursuant to said agreement has been by the City of Fridley; and WHEREAS, a party to the agreement, the City of Columbia Heights, has given written notice to the other parties via letter dated August 10, 1992 that it no longer wishes to participate in the agreement; and WHEREAS, the remaining parties desire to amend said agreement in order to continue the project of constructing and operating a fire training site. NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties agree to the following modifications of the agreement: 1. Deletion of Columbia Heights: Delete from the "Joint Powers Agreement - Fire Training Association" (copy attached, and hereafter called the AGREEMENT), the City of Columbia Heights, wherever that name appears, and change the number of"member departments" from four to three wherever stated. The undersigned hereby acknowledge receipt of a termination notice from the City of Columbia Heights by letter dated August 10, 1992 from its attorney Greggory J. Woods, and accept the termination in accordance with paragraph 16 of the AGREEMENT. There exists no claim against Columbia Heights for proportionate share-of_initial_construction_oosts_oLoperating costs. 2. Initial Construction: The "initial construction costs" identified in paragraph 6 of the AGREEMENT shall be changed to $150,000, it being understood that the parties may later increase this amount if additional contributions are approved by the parties' respective governing bodies. 3. Operating Budget: The statement in paragraph 7 of the AGREEMENT citing the 1991 Operating Budget is deleted. PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES 4. Amendment: The AGREEMENT amendment procedure shall require unanimous approval of the parties, in lieu of majority approval, reflecting the existence of three rather than four parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned governing bodies approve these amendments by authority of their duly authorized governing bodies on the date of their signature below. CITY OF FRIDLEY: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER: Mayor Mayor City Manager City Manager Date Date CITY OF SPRING LAKE PARK: CITY OF B . -E: Mayor Mayor 1 City Administrator City Manager .September 2 , 1993 Date Date CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW: Mayor City Administrator Date • JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FIRE TRAINING ASSOCIATION THIS AGREEMENT made by and between the City of Fridley ( "Fridley" ) , the City of Columbia Heights ( "Columbia Heights" ) , the City of Brooklyn Center ( "Brooklyn Center" ) , the City of Spring Lake Park ( "Spring Lake Park" ) , the City of Blaine ( "Blaine" ) , and the City of Mounds View ( "Mounds View" ) , each being a Minnesota municipal corporation, which together shall form the Fire Training Association (the "Association" ) . WHEREAS, each party to this Agreement desires a facility to train members of its fire department; and WHEREAS, it is more economical for the parties of this Agreement to jointly and collectively construct, use, and maintain a fire training facility rather than each party constructing and maintaining its own facility; and WHEREAS, Fridley, Columbia Heights , Brooklyn Center, Spring Lake Park, Blaine, and Mounds View are authorized to enter into an Agreement for the joint and cooperative exercise of powers common to them pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 471 . 59 et s-eq. ; and WHEREAS, the cities of Spring Lake Park, Blaine and Mounds View are provided fire protection services by the Spring Lake Park Fire Department, Inc. , a Minnesota non-profit corporation; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned governmental units and the Association in the joint and mutual exercise of their powers agree to jointly construct and maintain a fire training facility in accordance with the following terms: 1 . The Fire Training Association shall consist of four member departments. For purposes of this Agreement, Spring Lake Park, Blaine and Mounds View shall be collectively considered one Member and have one representative on the Chiefs ' Board. Spring Lake Park, Blaine and Mounds View appoint the Spring Lake Park Fire Department, Inc. as their agent, which together with the cities of Fridley, Columbia Heights, and Brooklyn Center shall be known as the ( "Member Departments" ) . 2 . Term: The term of this Agreement shall be perpetual until only one Member Department remains . 3 . Fire Training Facility. The training facility shall consist of a training tower and burn room and other elements of training as determined and recommended by an Operations Committee (Paragraph 14 hereof ) and approved by the Chiefs ' Board. 4 . Facility Site. The facility shall be constructed on property owned by the City of Fridley and located at 348 - 71st Avenue N.E. , Fridley, Minnesota.. The Member Departments and the City of Fridley hereby agree to execute a twenty-five ( 25 ) year lease of the property from Fridley to the Fire Training Association in consideration of the payment of $25 for the lease term. 5 . Ownership. Ownership of the facility, excluding land, shall be jointly held by the Association. -2- 6 . Initial Construction. Initial construction costs are projected to be $200 ,000 , which shall be shared equally by the members. The initial construction costs shall not exceed $200 ,000 .00 without prior approval of each Member Department' s City .Council. Each Member Department shall pay its cost allocation for the facility construction pursuant to the payment schedule unanimously approved by the Chiefs ' Board. 7 . Operating Agent. The operating agent shall have authority , on behalf of the Association, to pay costs authorized under the Operating Budget for the training site , and any additional expenses unanimously approved by the Chiefs ' Board. An annual Operating Budget shall be forecast in the second quarter of each year for the following year ' s operation of the site. The 1991 Operating Budget is projected to be $6,000 . The City of Fridley is appointed as the initial operating agent. The Chiefs ' Board shall have the authority to name an alternate department to take on this responsibility as it deems necessary. The Chiefs ' Board is specifically empowered to set a limit on the yearly operating costs . Failure—of a Member Department to pay its proportional share of the yearly operating costs, or additional expenses unanimously approved by the Chiefs ' Board, shall be grounds for removal of that Department upon the sole discretion of a majority vote of the Chiefs ' Board. -3- 8 . Agent for Construction. The Member, Departments authorize the specifically City of Fridley to act as the Agent for Construction of the facility on their behalf . The Agent for Construction is empowered to commission designs for the facility according to the specifications approved by the Chiefs ' Board. Following approval by the Chiefs ' Board, the Agent for Construction shall cause bids to be taken for the construction and shall present the final bids to the Chiefs ' Board for ratification. Once the bids and specifications nave been approved by the Chiefs ' Board, the Agent for Construction shall have the power to award the contracts and bind the Member Departments to the contracts so awarded. 9 . Repairs and Improvements. If recommended by the Operations Committee and approved by the Chiefs ' Board in advance and ratified by each of the Member Department ' s City Councils , all major repairs , replacements , additions/improvements shall be equally assessed against each Member Department. 10 . Insurance. The Association shall purchase policy( ies ) of insurance in forms and amounts to protect its insurable interests in the value of the site 's improvements against perils of fire, theft, vandalism and Acts of God, and to protect the. financial interests of the Association, parties , their agents and employees , against all claims or lawsuits , including expenses and attorney fees , -4- • arising from the ownership, design, operation, and maintenance of the facility. The policy( ies ' ) limits , terms and conditions shall be acceptable to each party. Costs of insurance shall be apportioned equally to each Member Department. . 11. Facility Use. Each Member Department shall be entitled • to equal use of the facility, subject to advance scheduling through the Operations Committee under the rules and guidelines established by the Chiefs ' Board. 12 . Use By Others . The Chiefs ' Board shall establish guidelines for use of the facility by others for a fee. The Operations Committee shall carry out the guidelines and shall be in charge of scheduling and collection of rents/fees. No rental shall be scheduled so as to conflict with any scheduled activity by a Member Department. Any rents/fees collected in excess of current year operating expenses may, at the Chiefs ' Board 's discretion, be retained for repair, improvements to the facility, future operating expenses , or returned to the Member Departments. 13 . Chiefs ' Board. The Chiefs ' Board shall consistofthe Fire Chief or the Fire Chief ' s designee of each Member Department unless another representative is designated by the City Council of a Member. The Beard shall act by majority vote of a quorum present at a board meeting (unless unanimous approval is required by this Agreement) duly called by a member of the Board upon notice given to -5- all members by mail 20 days in advance of the meeting. The Board may act without a meeting by a unanimous writing in lieu of a meeting. 14 . Operations Committee. The Operations Committee shall consist of a firefighter/officer appointed by the Fire Chief of each Member Department. 15 . Indemnification. Each non-Member Department or organization using the facility shall fully indemnify the Member Departments against all loss , damage liability claims , suits, judgments, costs and expenses by reason of loss of or damage to property and injury to or death of persons caused by acts or omissions of the non-member organization, its officers , agents or employees , arising from or growing out of, directly or indirectly, wholly or partly, its maintenance, operation or use of the facility. 16 . Termination of Agreement. Any Member Department may terminate its participation under this Agreement by giving 60 days advance written notice ofintent to terminate, directed to the attention of the remaining Members of the Chiefs ' Board. The terminating Member Department has no right of refund for its s--hare of f-e-es or costs paid under this Agreement, and waives any and all rights and interest in the training facility. Furthermore, any city terminating its participation under this Agreement is bound to pay its proportionate share of the initial construction costs. Said city shallalso be -6- ' a responsible for its proportionate share of outstanding operating costs through the fiscal year in which it gives notice of withdrawal. A withdrawing member shall have no claim to assets of the Association including excess fees or rents collected under paragraph 12 . Upon the withdrawal of all Member Departments, the land and improvements shall revert to the City of Fridley. 17. Dissolution. Upon unanimous approval by the Member Departments, the dissolution of this Association may be adopted, at which time the Building and Property shall revert to the City of Fridley, and all other assets and liabilities shall be divided among the remaining Member Departments in proportion to the contribution of the remaining Member Departments . ' 18 . Amendment. Any amendments to this Agreement require a two-thirds vote of the Members of the Chiefs ' Board and must be approved by the City Councils for each party. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers by authority of their respective governing bodies. City of Fridley City of Columbia Heights /L/J.L444.,„ Mayor Mayor 14/424.,0 City Manager City Manager h97 //)//0 Date/ Date -7- City of Brooklyn Center City of Spring Lake Park iP Mayor Mayor City Manager City Manager /7 f%9v Date Date City of Blaine City of Mounds View Mayor Mayor City Manager Cler -Acs, isirator ! 2- Z6-9 O Date Date -8- Age REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Section: 9.a 7:05p.m. ^^^'� Report Number: 93-615C STAFF REPORT Report Date: 9-8-93 Council Action: 0 Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE September 13, 1993 0 Public Hearings 0 Consent Agenda EC Council Business Item Description: Continuation of Public Hearing to Consider 'Request for Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Continued Use of a Temporary Structure at 7901 Red Oak Drive, Planning Case 366-93 Administrator's Review/Recommendation: 411111"- No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. SUMMARY; As directed by the City Council following discussion at the September 7, 1993 Work Session, Staff has prepared the attached Resolution for consideration on the requested Conditional Use Permit. If you have any questions or, would like to review any documents submitted as part of this application, please let me know and those items will be provided. • ;2 • Paul Harrington, ity Planner • RECOMMENDATION: Adopt City Council Resolution No. 4409 approving the requested Conditional Use permit for Church Upon the Rock, 7901 Red Oak Drive, Planning Case No. 366-93 . RESOLUTION NO. 4409 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A TEMPORARY PORTABLE CLASSROOM FOR CHURCH UPON THE ROCK, 7901 RED OAK DRIVE PLANNING CASE NO. 366-93 WHEREAS, Church Upon the Rock has made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the continued use of. a temporary portable classroom at 7901 Red Oak Drive; and WHEREAS, In 1988 , the. Mounds View City Council gave approval for a Conditional Use Permit for the placement of a temporary portable classroom on the property; and WHEREAS, the approved City Council resolution con- tained a "sunset" clause, which effectively revoked the permit after a five year period; and WHEREAS, the current request is in response to the sunsetting of the previous approval ; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval in Resolution No. 365-93 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the requested Conditional Use Permit for the location of a temporary portable classroom for Church Upon the Rock, 7901 Red Oak Drive, contingent upon the following: 1. The approved temporary portable classroom shall be removed from the property no later than July 1, 1994 . 2 . The parking lot and driveways on the property shall be surfaced with City approved materials no later than October 1, 1993 . Resolution No. 4409 Page Two 3 . The exterior of the principal building and the temporary portable classroom shall be painted no later than November 1, 1993 . Adopted this 13th day of September, 1993 . ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator Agenda Section: 9.b, 7:06p.m. MOS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 93-616C Report ounncilcil Action: STAFF REPORT Cc i 9-8-93 Council 0 Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE September 13, 1993 0 Public Hearings 0 Consent Agenda ® Council Business Item Description: Continuation of Introduction of Ordinance No. 528, Repeal of Sunset Provision Of Street Light Ur ity,,'Ordinance No. 528 Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Expcanation/Sumulary (a4Ladi Supp} SUMMARY: At the August 23 , 1993, City Council meeting, consideration of Ordinance No. 528 that would repeal the sunset clause of the Street Light Utility was tabled. This extra time afforded the opportunity for the new Councilmember to come on board and to clarify some questions that had arisen, which was done at the September 7, 1993, Council Work Session. When the Street Light Utility was created, it was given a sunset date. The reason for the sunset clause was to allow the City Council to reevaluate the effectiveness of the Utility, to allow an opportunity to reexamine its rate structure and determine if the Utility would be continued or discontinued. It is important to note that action taken on this item would either continue or discontinue the Street Light Utility. If this Utility were to be continued, the rates could be changed after the fate of the Utility has been decided. The rate structure could be changed via resolution, effective January 1, 1994 . • (1,4(241,vvk Tim Cruikshank, Asst. to City Admin. RECOMMENDATION: A staff recommendation is not made for this item. The options are to waive the reading and formally introduce Ordinance No. 528, repeal of the sunset clause of the Street Light Utility or a motion to deny approval. ORDINANCE NO. 528 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 72.08 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW TO CONTINUE A STREET LIGHTING UTILITY PROGRAM TO OPERATE, MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE THE LIGHTING OF CITY STREETS. The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION 1. Purpose. By Ordinance No. 497, the City Council enacted a street lighting utility program for the purpose of operating, maintaining and improving the street lighting in the City. The Ordinance contained a sunset provision stating that it would automatically be terminated as of December 31, 1993 unless extended by the City Council. The City Council deems that it is in the best interest of the public to repeal the sunset provision. SECTION 2. Section 72.08 of the Mounds View Municipal Code is hereby repealed. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance is effective 30 days after its publication. Introduced to the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this the 13th day of September, 1993. Read and adopted by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this the th day of , 1993. ATTEST Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1 City Attorney Agenda Section: 10.A Illor :IS.. a\ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION RenortNumber: 93-6170 ST F RESORT Report Date: 9-8-93 1 Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE September 13, 1993 0 Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda ffl Council Business Item Description: Continuation of Action on Ordinance No. 529 Establishing a Surface Water Utility And Amending Mounds View Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 73 Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) TTMMARY; • At the August 23rd City Council meeting, consideration of adoption of Ordinance No. 529 Establishing a Surface Water Management Utility was tabled to the meeting of September 13, 1993. In the interim time, staff was directed to examine an alternative rate structure which would lessen the burden of the utility charges to the City's business community. The alternative was developed by Rocky Keene, the City's consulting hydrologist from SEH, and presented for Council review at the September 7th Work Session. • The basis of the alternative rate structure is one in which the type of soil was changed from Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Type B soil to Type A which is a more sandy soil condition and is actually more consistent With the soil types in the majority of the areas of the City which have been developed by commercial or industrial businesses. Changing. the soil type reduced the potential run-off factor, thereby decreasing the utility factor and overall rate. The alternative rate structure (attached herein as "Scenario No 2) would raise the yearly residential household cost by $.91. It would also raise the yearly costs for church and school property classifications._T e originalr_ate str_uctur_eis included_herein as cenario No.1. At the September 7th Council Work Session, Rocky Keene explained the plans regarding each of the proposed surface water management projects as outlined in the City's Surface Water Management Plan. He will also be present Monday night to discuss in greater detail the plans for each of the projects and describe the impact on the City of either completing or not completing the proposed projects. IIIIIIIILiiiise. Er Ozt-41-14A9-- 5- antha Orduno, ity Administrator RECOMM - DATI• Staff does not have a formal recommendation regarding the Surface Water Management Utility.Action can either be to adopt or not adopt the ordinance. The vote required to adopt the ordinance is a simple majority (3 votes). If the Council so chooses to adopt the ordinance, consideration must be given as to which "scenario" you wish to adopt- No. 1 which is the original utility factors, or No. 2 which is the alternative utility factors. Ordinance #1 reflects the Scenario No. 1, Ordinance #2 reflects the alternative utility factor structure. STAFF REPORT PAGE TWO SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 I know there has been concerns expressed in the community that there is a lack of understanding regarding the proposed projects and their impact on the City overall and, more specially, certain areas of the City. Hopefully, the concerns will be satisfactorily addressed at the meeting. The proposed ordinance is the "establishment" of the utility. If approved, the next step will be to adopt a resolution which formally sets the fee structure. That action could take place at a future meeting. Previous discussions regarding the anticipated expenditures of the surface water management have noted that street sweeping, catch basin cleaning, equipment repair and consulting engineering services would be included in the expenditures as these expenditures are currently be paid out of the existing storm water management fund. There has evidently been some confusion as to the City having two funds, one Storm Water and the other Surface Water. It is proposed that the current Storm Water Management Fund be renamed Surface Water Management Fund to be consistent with the Surface Water Management Plan. There will not be two separate funds. On December 31, 1992, the Storm Water Management Fund had a balance of$150,038 (as per the City's audited financial report). The 1993 budget for storm water management provides for a expenditures of $47, 031. As of August 31, 1993, the SWM budget has had expenditures totalling $16,199.44. Of the $47,031 budgeted for SWM for 1993, $8,000 is anticipated revenues of$3,500 in interest and $4,500 in connection charges. A total of $39,031 has been budgeted as a appropriation from the $150,038 balance in the SWM Fund. As of August 31, 1993, the SWM Fund had a balance of $134,444. Attached herein are the fund sheets from the 1993 budget. If the City were to continue to fund the afore mentioned activities from the existing SWM Fund, at the 1993 rate of revenues and expenditures, the Fund, as it is set up today, would be depleted in less than 5 years. The current SWM Fund does not provide for the completion of any projects. 09/01/93 12:0.4 FA1 3Gn J1. r:11-1 -,yy av1.:01/o .1L„ LE,I.,.." iii • , N.•• N (0 d in .. O tD O CO ? `- to r Cv.D. C to ? 0 CA 0 Cn LC!) 07NN . cu LrP o vir CC Q d N7 Er) 6 to se N co N P1 >f ' EL (x Z EF!69.USd359 co co N3• rn c' p 0 w ::0::: LL Q X co CZ 0 W '` CC -1 'nagQQQ < 4 < < ( AUt W = 'zzzzzzzzZ > :. e_ _ C g CC J CC Q Q Q a Q Q Q Q Q r Ui _ ZZZZZZZZZ :: — ■ mvvo33 Li: gco O .:p 'V^ W D6eit6000CN QN.�NN4�G_lYdF_fi J z d �: Z J a w }_. c� cnC) aNC�O F- NQ � � N J Q Q: J r�imiaN CO)^i0i>NNCOn LLI • _ R.O; F •-:e»VT '�� �� C] w O:: y w o w o O W a bj uj Q _ zv � � 0LOONN � N4N. rs, fiCC ~ = J Z O YN t7 � C70 2m LU TG O H3 L. J W 1-- 1.11 = � cc Z LLf U w3 • w n tri * e * aRaae3E * a� ag UJ 0 U cr• � � Qo z CD 1 No inrnoco � � MM � � c Z1- Cn in y O y co‘I:a• ¢ � H C�icvoir; ...-1 v o v _1 1-") Z O 02 '- r` I- OZ `'� — u- CC 1-- Q a = o tt) ON I CC ....9 DE^- 0 � ¢ w • T- 07 co '• N 0- � N C3 N a' O co CR , tNf� >- UJ ' W x - W JLjjwG U- 41 � Oco �- o � ciusc� � mQCCzJ O J HOH .JzMJ Lc. � C COc6 ---er) co r. V TN (rf O p Za aZZO OOr e' r 0 Will w ! WZ N d O V m-Q Z > > IU zJ ¢ CI_DCC---2Gn W N � Z O2 C W LLI C0 CC> > of < W r CC co � W CCCCCCa QOw W � dNcoU W JCC • vmnvi —i,o ,nmr� cc •- cc o -J F__ p � C] Q LU Q } Cf) OCEJ6l •• NI O2N .- O to CD CO CO 1.1-1 cc F ~ cr 0QJ < O = to � W w cn r •,ti N NUzOp Q. UpN Z CC 0 < t2 1- p cr < o < Z o QV Z � Ct _ w OQUlcn < Q d MILIu- � D } • 00r+ rv � vornd LLco cil tn00 � Cr J u_ 6 M m co 67 N 02 01 O W CC 0w Coco •= oco � o ZOOW O � u- t- Lu w ui J z co .L LU J W N '- CC > W cc et W mcc T— 0 I--Ccc C H U S °cs Lai. 2 VaQ >- a0QQz � cC _ —J LL Z Q W W a W 11.1 W CC 0 < W }.• CL to W z CC - - I in -I Q ~ 2 N 00 N v Orcc F- JCnF.- ¢ CO 1.- nw LU CC NJ O � 0W uj W 1, W0 = 01- 0007 E- O CO c7 d j .� W LL p U H y v N a C, in o • CC CC CCCC m •rUa_ Q. cOc0 _ •.• 09Y01/93 12:05 FAX Shit Si. Y.iLL --' . LA-L IZ Yi. TY wdvvut V11 J t it • u, u, u) OtTCCOO W w CO yr V; W 0. N CO 00 CI crnoiuspmouio • < CO Q u7 u7 toes 0 0 us en 4,1 N LLC) CCA cr ;H; ¢ W Z Cif co to,d9 of Q)ce. � I Ch' CL c :0 O O .0 :•Ui u G O N w CC --J `D ¢ QQQaQQQQ u) W: w1 �ZZZZZZZZZ W cL = • CC ... I . Q .. Q Q Q Q ¢ Q Q Q Q cc _ vi ZZZZZZZZZ i N :.F:. �t R N-len N - 't CA N . ._ Cl: O0on1-- 1.A0) Oh.. tn -.:S ;: W C7 NZ r4 f7 r CJ! 1� J 0;.. W = QNNNN ti}' N O �.64 N}64{�}69 t�fPf -- J �l � Q Z Q °�' O w Ar— ;�[ji: u] N � � C7Ni� d Nm N J J .:C fico - torCO W bOh O 1- LU 03071 LO69.MN O r- <69. F- Z t t►. C] W MIME F...._ z � Q 1- W yQ OQDNNTrCD4NQO � 0Z O J _1U rNt�) ci\t*al�iO � c') N O �ULL Q Z O H OW N W Z l-. ti QIJJ a. � W C'3 W- UJ W E, NG it mO� an` N � c� °�) Nd 0 Ute_ JO z CoO Q - }Q.. � U p coco - Q � � � cnc; an uioa � CS , Fri �wd0 � Z U.I0 0) 6 I- OZ LL QI"' � > _ = Z ,� 1 ��, O Z O O J 2 Cl)L/, p Oom ► DU ZQWO2 CO Or I cc „D CC CCF- 0 Ue Q W 2 � W --1 U.1 u_ Lu N4I� N covococo v �' ZLLI < t ti cO O C7 r d' d c7 h O CZ CC p CC ..1 � O � > > J tig c � rnco � -- M O � JwZ 0 0 U � 0 LL WW= -U rn WLJ = Q h cr)W m 1- O zwwy CC > 5cctiWcc - r» w Z ") cc W Ii a U UJ < )' C • el. v' rO47m1� COr W o jOw � iO Ow � Q W ? 47T < w 0MtnmTrnN � O � LOe Qr! WCC I- co CCCC: -IN G Z C7, OCcc r N O QC!) OU tZQO Z a o aQ ?cC >z -IW 0 Cl) 2 ¢ U m , LL. La. 111-- 0 W >. 0 0 1- N o < 0 C�) O CC J Imo ^ coaoenc> cnrc+) occ pt- I- Q < 1-H W CC u' t�iJ 0 00 000 , O Gn 0I- Z' OOWCC 0w - - W Z0 ccUUZII. C3g_ � O w � z JUJU J - WN '' cc > Q CC w m CC W 0 _ � � wwccrWcC2 WF- UI- U05O U. 0cs O ¢ q JQUQQZcc y CC 00 < >„ W � 1- a LI- c7 N 00 N v_ OIj tC O '' co F' � o -IHOco11J W CC N4 CC 0c7 OWW HWD cc 0 UO � UQQ m � coe firLIC " 2LL OU }- ¢ c �: uc F 2 = Irlrm = U a. a_ coco3 NO. 1 • ORDINANCE NO. 529 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY AND AMENDING THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 73 The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. General Operation. Subdivision 1. The Municipal surface water system shall be operated as a public utility (hereinafter called the Surface Water Management Utility), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, from which revenues will be derived subject to the provisions of this Chapter and Minnesota Statutes. The Mounds View Municipal Code is amended by adding Chapter 73 to be entitled, "Surface Water Management Utility". Subdivision 2. Findings and Determinations. In providing for such charges, the findings and determinations are as follows: (a) In the exercise of its governmental authority and in order to promote the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare, the City has constructed, operated and maintained a surface water system ("the system"). This section is adopted in the further exercise and authority and for the same purpose. (b) The system, as constructed, heretofore has been financed and paid for through the ad valorem taxes and assessments. Such financing methods were appropriate to the circumstances at the time they were used. It is now necessary and desirable to provide an alternative method of recovering some or all of the future costs of improving, maintaining and operating the system through the imposition of user charges. (c) In imposing charges, it is necessary to establish a methodology that undertakes to make them just and equitable. Taking into account the status of completion of the system, past methods of recovering system costs, the topography of the City and other relevant factors, it is determined that it would be just and equitable to assign responsibility for some or all of the future costs of operating, maintaining and improving the system on the basis of the expected storm water runoff from the various parcels of land within the City during a standard one-year rainfall event. (d) Assigning costs and making charges based upon typical storm water runoff cannot be done with mathematical precision but can only be accomplished within reasonable and practical limits. The provisions of this section undertake to establish a reasonable and practical methodology for making such charges. ORDINANCE NO. 529 PAGE TWO OF FOUR SECTION II. Definitions. Utility Factor. (A) Utility Factor. The utility factor is defined as the ratio of runoff volume, in inches, for a particular land use, to the runoff volume, in inches for an average single-family residential lot, assuming a 2-inch rainfall and Soil Conservation Service (SCS) "Type B" soil conditions. (B) Surface Water Management Fee. The surface water management fee is defined as the quarterly charge developed for each parcel of land pursuant to this Chapter. (C) Quarterly Surface Water Management Revenue Requirement. The quarterly surface water management revenue requirement is the estimated quarterly expenditures for planning and inventories, capital expenditures, personnel, equipment and operation of the surface water utility, in accordance with established City policy. The quarterly surface water management revenue requirement and resulting surface water management fees shall be established for a period of time as set by City Council resolution. SECTION III. Surface Water Management Fee. (A) The Surface Water Management Fee shall be determined by first determining the percentage of total runoff in the City which is attributed to Residential property. The Total Fee for all Residential property in the City is computed by multiplying the runoff percentage by one-quarter (1/4) of the annual Surface Water Management Revenue Requirement. The Residential Surface Water Management Fee, per acre, is determined by dividing the Total Residential Fee by the estimated total acres of Residential land use in the City. (B) The Surface Water Management FeeforResidential, T_ownhomes/condominiums, Apartments and Mobile Home Parks will be determined on a per-household basis rather than a per acre basis. The Fee per household is determined by first determining the Total Fee for each land use. The Total Fee for each land use is determined by multiplying the Total Fee for all Residential property by the appropriate utility factor based on land use. The Total Fee is then divided by the total number of households for the particular land use, resulting in cost per household. (C) The Surface Water Management Fee for all individual parcels, excluding residential, shall be defined as the product of (1) the Residential Surface Water Management Fee (per acre); (2) the appropriate utility factor based on land use, and (3) the total acreage of the parcel. Subdivision 1. Credits. The Council may adopt policies, by resolution, for adjustment of the surface water management fees. Information to justify a fee adjustment must be supplied by the property owner. Such adjustments of fees shall not be retroactive unless provided within said resolution. Credits will be reviewed regularly by a staff committee. ORDINANCE NO. 529 PAGE THREE OF FOUR Subdivision 2. Surface Water Management Utility Factors. The utility factors for various land uses are as follows: Classification Land Use Utility Factor Al, R2 Single & Two Family Residential 1.0 R-3 Medium Density Residential 2.68 R-4, R-5, R-0 High Density Residential, Mobile Homes, 3.26 Residential Office B-1, B-2, 8-3, B-4 Neighborhood Business, Limited Business, 4.17 Highway Business, Regional Business 1-1 Industrial 3.26 PF Public Facilities 1.28 PUD Planned Unit Development 3.69 CRP Conservancy, Recreation & Presentation 0.46 School/Church Public/Private 1.5 Subdivision 4. Other Land Uses. Other land uses not listed in the foregoing table shall be classified by the City Administrator by assigning them to the classes most nearly like the listed uses, from the standpoint of probable hydrologic response. Appeals from the City Administrator's determination of the proper classifications may be made to the City Council in the same manner as other appeals from administrative determinations. SECTION IV. Adjustments of Management Fees. The City Council may by resolution, from time to time, adopt policies providing for the adjustment of management fees for parcels or groups of parcels, based upon hydrologic data supplied by affected property owners, demonstrating an actual hydrologic response substantially different from the Utility Factor being used for the parcel or parcels. SECTION V. Excluded Lands. No management fee for system availability or service shall be made against land which is public street right-of-way. SECTION VI. Supplying Information. The owner, occupant or person-in-charge • - . o any. • - - _ .. . . - • . ..• - . - : --- . '_- .� - _ • . � • - -= - •=• request related to the use, development and area of the premises. Willful failure to provide such information or to falsify it is a violation of this subsection. SECTION VII. Estimated Charges. If the owner, occupant or person in charge of any premises fails or refuses to provide information requested under Section VI,.the management fee for such premises shall be estimated and billed in accordance with such estimate, based upon information then available to the City. SECTION VIII. Billings and Collections. Bills for Surface Water Management fees for the use and availability of the system shall be rendered by the Finance Department in accordance with usual and customary practice in rendering of water and sanitary sewer service bills. Bills shall be rendered quarterly, shall be payable at the office of the City ORDINANCE NO. 529 • PAGE FOUR OF FOUR Finance Department and may be rendered in conjunction with billings for water or sanitary sewer service, or both. SECTION IX. Penalties and Remedies for Delinquent or Default in Paving Bills. Penalties and remedies for late payments or non-payment of billings shall be the same as those applicable to billings rendered for water and sanitary sewer service. SECTION X. Use of Revenues. Revenues received from charges shall be placed in the "surface water management utility account" and shall be used to finance operational costs and improvements_to and betterment of the system. SECTION XI. EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this ordinance is 30 days after its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 9th day of August, 1993. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 23rd day of August, 1993. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney N O. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 529 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY AND AMENDING THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 73 The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. General Operation. Subdivision 1. The Municipal surface water system shall be operated as a public utility (hereinafter called the Surface Water Management Utility), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, from which revenues will be derived subject to the provisions of this Chapter and Minnesota Statutes. The Mounds View Municipal Code is amended by adding Chapter 73 to be entitled, "Surface Water Management Utility". Subdivision 2. Findings and Determinations. In providing for such charges, the findings and determinations are as follows: (a) In the exercise of its governmental authority and in order to promote the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare, the City has constructed, operated and maintained a surface water system ("the system"). This section is adopted in the further exercise and authority and for the same purpose. (b) The system, as constructed, heretofore has been financed and paid for through the ad valorem taxes.and assessments. Such financing methods were appropriate to the circumstances at the time they were used. It is now necessary and desirable to provide an alternative method of recovering some or all of the future costs of improving, maintaining and operating the system through the imposition of user charges. (c) In imposing charges, it is necessary to establish a methodology that undertakes to make them just and equitable. Taking into account the status of completion of the system, past methods of recovering system cos s, e opograp y o it would be just and equitable to assign responsibility for some or all of the future costs of operating, maintaining and improving the system on the basis of the expected storm water runoff from the various parcels of land within the City during a standard one-year rainfall event. (d) Assigning costs and making charges based upon typical storm water runoff cannot be done with mathematical precision but can only be accomplished within reasonable and practical limits. The provisions of this section undertake to establish a reasonable and practical methodology for making such charges. ORDINANCE NO. 529 PAGE TWO OF FOUR SECTION II. Definitions. Utility Factor. (A) Utility Factor. The utility factor is defined as the ratio of runoff volume, in inches, for a particular land use, to the runoff volume, in inches for an average single-family residential lot, assuming a 2-inch rainfall and Soil Conservation Service (SCS) "Type B" soil conditions. (B) Surface Water Management Fee. The surface water management fee is defined as the quarterly charge developed for each parcel of land pursuant to this Chapter. (C) Quarterly Surface Water Management Revenue Requirement. The quarterly surface water management revenue requirement is the estimated quarterly expenditures for planning and inventories, capital expenditures, personnel, equipment and operation of the surface water utility, in accordance with established City policy. The quarterly surface water management revenue requirement and resulting surface water management fees shall be established for a period of time as set by City Council resolution. SECTION III. Surface Water Management Fee. (A) The Surface Water Management Fee shall be determined by first determining the percentage of total runoff in the City which is attributed to Residential property. The Total Fee for all Residential property in the City is computed by multiplying the runoff percentage by one-quarter (1/4) of the annual Surface Water Management Revenue Requirement. The Residential Surface Water Management Fee, per acre, is determined by dividing the Total Residential Fee by the estimated total acres of Residential land use in the City. (B) The Surface Water Management Fee for Residential, Townhomes/condominiums, •_ • ••-• _•• ,,••' - -••. - -- . , • •- • - - 111•11 -• • - •er-household basis rather than a •er acre basis. The Fee per household is determined by first determining the Total Fee for each land use. The Total Fee for each land use is determined by multiplying the Total Fee for all Residential property by the appropriate utility factor based on land use. The Total Fee is then divided by the total number of households for the particular land use, resulting in cost per household. (C) The Surface Water Management Fee for all individual parcels, excluding residential, shall be defined as the product of (1) the Residential Surface Water Management Fee (per acre); (2) the appropriate utility factor based on land use, and (3) the total acreage of the parcel. Subdivision 1. Credits. The Council may adopt policies, by resolution, for adjustment of the surface water management fees. Information to justify a fee adjustment must be supplied by the property owner. Such adjustments of fees shall not be retroactive unless provided within said resolution. Credits will be reviewed regularly by a staff committee. ORDINANCE NO. 529 PAGE THREE OF FOUR Subdivision 2. Surface Water Management Utility Factors. The utility factors for yarious land uses are as follows: Classification Land Use Utility Factor R1, R2 Single & Two Family Residential 1.0 R-3 Medium Density Residential 2.68 R-4, R-5, R-0 High Density Residential; Mobile Homes, 3.26 Residential Office B-1, B-2, B-3, B-4 Neighborhood Business, Limited Business, 3.47 Highway Business, Regional Business I-1 Industrial 2.04 • PF Public Facilities 1.28 PUD Planned Unit Development 3.47 CRP Conservancy, Recreation & Presentation 0.46 School/Church Public/Private 2.04 Subdivision 4. Other Land Uses. Other land uses not listed in the foregoing table shall be classified by the City Administrator by assigning them to the classes most. nearly like the listed uses, from the standpoint of probable hydrologic response. Appeals from the City Administrator's determination of the proper classifications may be made to the City Council in the same manner as other appeals from administrative determinations. SECTION IV. Adjustments of Management Fees. The City Council may by resolution, from time to time, adopt policies providing for the adjustment of management fees for parcels or groups of parcels, based upon hydrologic data supplied by affected property owners, demonstrating an actual hydrologic response substantially different from the Utility Factor being used for the parcel or parcels. SECTION V. Excluded Lands. No management fee for system availability or service shall be made against land which is public street right-of-way. SECTION VI. Supplying Information. The owner, occupant or person in charge of any premises shall supply the City with such information as the City may reasonably request related to the use, development and area of the premises. Willful failure to provide such information or to falsify it is a violation of this subsection. SECTION VII. Estimated Charges. If the owner, occupant or person in charge of any premises fails or refuses to provide information requested under Section VI, the management fee for such premises shall be estimated and billed in accordance with such estimate, based upon information then available to the City. SECTION VIII. Billings and Collections. Bills for Surface Water Management fees for the use and availability of the system shall be rendered by the Finance Department in accordance with usual and customary practice in rendering of water and sanitary sewer service bills. Bills shall be rendered quarterly, shall be payable at the office of the City • ORDINANCE NO. 529 PAGE FOUR OF FOUR Finance Department and may be rendered in conjunction with billings for water or sanitary sewer service, or both. SECTION IX. Penalties and Remedies for Delinquent or Default in Paving Bills. Penalties and remedies for late payments or non-payment of billings shall be the same as those applicable to billings rendered for water and sanitary sewer service. SECTION X. Use of Revenues. Revenues received from charges shall be placed in the "surface water management utility account" and shall be used to finance it prove•• -- e -. e •- • ••- • • the-system. SECTION XI. EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this ordinance is 30 days after its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 9th day of August, 1993. . Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 23rd day of August, 1993. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FUND REVENUE COMMENTARY A Storm Water Management Fund was established, pursuant to Chapter 25 of the City Code, to provide for the preservation and improvement of storm water drainage facilities within the City of Mounds View. Any person who applies for a building permit and whose land the City Engineer determines contributes storm water to the City storm water drainage system shall pay a storm water management charge as determined by applicable provisions of the City Code. Storm Water Management Charges shall be used only for expenses incurred in the design, construction, preservation, or improvement of City storm water management systems. Those expenses shall include, but shall not be limited to, acquisition of land, wetlands and easements, construction of water quality control improvements, preservation of wetlands and retirement of debt issued in connection with storm water management system improvements. During 1993 it is estimated that the Fund will receive $4,500 in connection charges and earn $3,500 in interest income. Approximately $39,031 of fund balance will be used for 1993 expenditures. j CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 1993 BUDGETED REVENUES 420 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FUND 1990 1991 1992 1993 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED PROPOSED CHARGES FOR SERVICES 3472 CONNECTION CHARGES $11,315 $6,028 $0 $4,500 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES $11,315 $6,028 $0 $4,500 OTHER REVENUES 3901 INTEREST INCOME $19,096 $14,389 00 3850 APPROPRIATION - FUND BALANCE $0 $0 $27,481 $39,031 3961 TRANSFERS $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL OTHER REVENUES $19,096 $14,389 $27,481 $42,531 GRAND TOTAL STORM WATER MGT FUND $30,411 $20,417 $27,481 $47,031 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FUND EXPENDITURE COMMENTARY During 1993 the Storm Water Management Fund will finance the maintenance of City storm drainage facilities and street sweeping. Storm sewer maintenance activities include storm sewer cleaning, catch basin marking, and maintenance of storm water inlet and outlet devices and structures. Approximately 1,359 man - hours are budgeted for these storm sewer maintenance and street sweeping activities. In addition the purchase of computer software for monitoring impacts on wetlands will be financed by the Fund During 1993 the City will be replacing it's truck mounted jet rudder which is used to .4 . 1 . a .•• • u - w all' 9 ••- . contribute $10,729 toward the purchase of the jet rodder. The estimated cost of the jet rodder is $175,718. The balance of the cost will be paid from the Sewer Utility Fund. CTY OF MOUNDS VIEW DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET DETAIL - 1993 EXPENDITURES 20-4121 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FUND COUNCIL 1990 1991 1992 1992 DEPARTMENT TEAM CIL- ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED ESTIMATED REQUESTS REQUESTS APPROVES TEM DESCRIPTION ------ ------ -------- ,ERSONNEL SERVICES ------ $0 $0 $18x480 $18,482 $11,5284 $11,5280 $11,528 )20 SALARIES, REGULAR $0 $1,398 )20 SALARIES, TEMP/PART-TIME $0 0 $2,242 $2,242 $1,398 $1,398 )30 PENSIONS $0 $0 $2,546 $2,546 $1,431 $1,431 $1,431 050 WORKERS $2,242 $2,242GROUP $0 $0 $1,560 $1,560� N $755 -- $755 $755 05 _____ __-- ---- VICES $0 $0 $24,830 $24,830 $15,112 $15,112 $15,112 T4TAL PERSONNEL SER MATERIALS + SUPPLIES 160 UR $1,025 $130 $2, $2,350 $1,950 $1,950 _$1,$1950 4SUPPLIES,MOPERATING $0 $0 $301 _--30- - 240 UNIFORMS + CLOTHING _-��_ ------- --""_-- " TOTAL MATERIALS + SUPPLIES $1,025 $130 $2,651 $2,651 $2,130 $2,130 $2,130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $0747 $0 $12,5004 $8,560 $8,560 3LEGAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE $29,401 $17$475 $0 $0 $650 $4$0 $450 341 TRAININGTNOTICES $0 $50 450 $50 363 $1,348$0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 _--_$0 357 MILEAGETET $0 $19,819 $0 $0 -----$- 357 STREET SWEEPING --��-4 $13,200 $9,060 $9,060 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $30,749 $38,041 $0 $ CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $15,729 70EQUIPMENT $71,322 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $5,000 15,729 _ ----~- $20,729 7455 CONSTRUCTION - �- ------- - $0 $0 $15,000 $10,000 �� OUTLAY $71,322 $4 TOTAL CAP ------- ------ ------ GRAND TOTAL STORM WATER MANAGEMENT $1O3;096 $38;171 $27,481 $27,481 $45,442 $36,302 $47,031 107 Agend REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION oraNumber: Section: 10.B port Number. 91-6 1 S(' STAFF REPORT Report Date: 9-8_9 Council Action: JEW 0 Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE September 13, 1993 0 Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda g Council Business Item Description: Consideration of Approval of Contract Documents for Proposed City Hall Expansion Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplemen sheets . •ecessary.) SUMMARY The next step in the City Hall expansion project is to consider approving the floor plans as discussed at the September 7, 1993 , Council agenda session. On Monday evening, Milt Powell, the project manager from Bonestroo and Associates, will present the proposed final floor plan and the specifications of the project for your consideration. Mr. Powell will also discuss some of the materials that will be used and give an update on the actual cost of the project. Approval of this information would mean authorization for Bonestroo and Associates to advertise for bids from general construction contractors to begin the construction phase of the project. It is anticipated the bids could be received by 10/8/93 and brought to the 10/11/93 regular City Council meeting for your consideration. If the bid wereto be awarded at the 10/11/93 meeting, construction could begin 10/18/93 . • 4(:(11/1 Tim Cruikshank, Asst. to City Admin. • RECOMMENDATION: Approval of contract documents (plans and specifications) authorizing Bonestroo and Associates to advertise for bids from general construction contractors. Otto G.Bonestroo,PE. Howard A.Sanford PE. Agnes M.Ring,A.I.C.P Miles B.Jensen,PE. Bonestroo Robert W.Rosene,PE.* Keith A.Gordon,P.E. Philip J.Pyne.P.E. L.Phillip Gravel,P.E. Joseph C.Anderlik,P.E. Robert R.Pfefferle,P.E. Thomas W Peterson.PE. Karen L.Wiemeri,P.E. Marvin L.Sorvala,P.E. Richard W Foster.P.E. Michael C.Lynch.P.E. Gary D.Kristofitz,P.E. Rosene Richard E.Turner,P.E. David O.Loskota,P.E. James R.Maland,PE. F.Todd Foster,PE. Anderlik & Glenn R.Cook,PE. Robert C.Russek,A.I.A. Jerry D.Pertzsch,P.E. Keith R.Yapp,P.E. In Thomas E.Noyes.P.E. Jerry A.Bourdon,P.E. Scott J.Arganek,PE. Douglas J.Benoit,P.E. • Robert G.Schunicht.P.E. Mark A.Hanson.P.E. Kenneth P.Anderson.P.E. Shawn D.Gustafson,P.E. Associates Susan M.Eberlin,C.PA Michael T.Rautmann,P.E Mark R Rolfs.PE Cecilio Olivier,P.E. *Senior Consultant Ted K.Field.P,E. Mark A.Seip.P.E. Paul G.Heuer,P.E. Thomas R.Anderson.A.I.A. Gary W.Morien.P.E. John P.Gorder,P.E. Engineers & Architects Donald C.Burgardt,P.E. Daniel J.Edgerton,P.E. Charles A.Erickson Thomas E.Angus,P.E. A.Rick Schmidt,P.E. Leo M.Pawelsky Ismael Martinez,P.E. Philip J.Caswell.P.E. Harlan M.Olson Michael P.Rau,P.E. Mark D.Wailis,P.E. James F.Engelhardt ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE MOUNDS VIEW PARK BUILDING MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA Our File No. 43501 1.0 Foundations $ 15,000 2.0 Walls 75,000 3.0 Roof 30,000 4.0 Floor 10,000 5.0 Doors & Windows 25,000 III 6.0 Finishes 75,000 7.0 Mechanical 60,000 8.0 Electrical 55,000 9.0 Specials 5,000 10.0 General Provisions 75,000 Total $425,000 Building Area 3750 S.F. new construction 4830 S.F. remodelled Unit Cost $69.40 PSF Expected accuracy: 10-20% • Estimate does not include: Sitework, furnishings, moveable equipment, architectural commission, soil borings, surveys 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 .-- Otto G.Bonestroo,P.E. Howard A.Sanford.P.E. Agnes M.Ring,A.I.C.P. Miles B.Jensen.P.E. iiii Bonestroo Robert W.Rosene,P.E.* Keith A.Gordon.PE. Philip J.Pyne.PE. L.Phillip Gravel.P.E. Joseph C.Anderlik,P.E. Robert R.Pfefferle,P.E. Thomas W.Peterson.P.E. Karen L.Wiemeri,P.E. Rosene Marvin L.Sorvala.P.E. Richard W.Foster.P.E. Michael C.Lynch.P.E. Gary D.Kristofitz,PE. �/ Richard E.Turner,P.E. David O.Loskota,P.E. James R.Maland,P.E. F.Todd Foster,P.E. I.^ • Anderiiic Glenn R.Cook,P.E. Robert C.Russek,A.I.A. Jerry D.Pertzsch,P.E. Keith R.Yapp,P.E. Thomas E.Noyes.P.E. Jerry A.Bourdon.P.E. Scott J.Arganek,RE. Douglas J.Benoit,P.E. ID Vil Robert G.Schunicht.P.E. Mark A.Hanson.P.E. Kenneth P.AnP.E. Shawn D.Gustafson,P.E. Associates Susan M.Eberlin,C.P.A. Michael T.Rautmann,PE. Mark R.Rolfs.PE.derson. Cecilio Olivier,PE. *Senior Consultant Ted K.Field,P.E. Mark A.Seip,P.E. Paul G.Heuer,P.E. Thomas R.Anderson.A.I.A. Gary W.Morien.P.E. John P Gorder,P.E. Engineers & Architects Donald C.Burgardt.P.E. Daniel J.Edgerton,P.E. Charles A.Erickson Thomas E.Angus,P.E. A.Rick Schmidt,P.E. Leo M.Pawelsky Ismael Martinez,P.E. Philip J.Caswell,P.E. Harlan M.Olson Michael P.Rau,P.E. Mark D.Wallis,P.E. James F.Engelhardt PROJECT SCHEDULE MOUNDS VIEW CITY HALL Our File No. 43501 9/13/93 Approval of contract documents by City Council 9/20/93 Plans let for bidding 9/28/93 Addendum #1 III 9/29/93 Pre-bid meeting 10/6/93 Bid opening 10/11/93 Approval of bids by City Council • 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 da - or REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Rhe portnnumt�ecr 90-619C o t`yti MIDS STAFF REPORT Report Date: 9-8-93 Council Action: 0 Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE September 13, 1993 0 Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda (2 Council Business Item Description: PROPOSED 1994 PROPERTY TAX LEVY Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report / - Comments attached. . Attached please find Resolution 4418 which: 1) certifies to Ramsey County the City's Proposed 1994 Property Tax Levy, and 2) sets the City's public hearing on the 1994 Budget for Wednesday December 8, 1993 at 7: 00 p.m. (if a continuation of the hearing is necessary it is scheduled for Wednesday December 15, 1993 at 7: 00 p.m. ) . At the September 7, 1993 Work Session a donation to the Northwest Youth Service Bureau was added to the Budget. With this additional expenditure of $12, 500 the City's proposed 1994 General Fund G expenditures are $3, 176, 395; which is 6.7% more than 1993 expenditures of $2, 977,750. The City's proposed 1994 property tax levy is 11. 1% greater than the 1993 levy. The 1993 Legislature changed the procedure for I certification of our levy to the County. For 1994 the amount of Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA) the Minnesota Department of Revenue has certified the City to receive in 1994 is to be deducted from the property tax levy certified to the County. (In previous years the County deducted the HACA from the levy. ) . I mention this because in order to make comparisons between the 1993 and 1994 proposed levy meaningful I used—the levies before theHACAdeduction. The estimated effect upon the average homeowner ($84, 000 home) is an increase in the City's share of the property tax levy of $62 . 53 . That estimate is based upon the home's estimated market value increasing by I 2 . 3% from 1993 to 1994 and the latest estimates of the City's aggregate net tax capacity values from the County. I have learned that the County will use updated values to prepare Truth In Taxation notices mailed to taxpayers. When those estimates become available I will recalculate the impact of the City's levy upon the average homeowner. Enclosures RECOMMENDATION: ' Donald Brager, Fi dice Director ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4418, CERTIFYING THE 1994 PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND SETTING THE DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SAME PURSUANT TO TRUTH IN TAXATION LEGISLATION. RESOLUTION NO. 4418 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the Council of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota was held at City Hall on September 13, 1993 with the following members present: and the following members absent: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE 1994 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET, 1994 PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND SETTING THE DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SAME PURSUANT TO TRUTH IN TAXATION LEGISLATION BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota, as follows: 1 ) RESOLVED that pursuant to Truth in Taxation legislation the Council adopts the following as the Proposed 1994 City Operating Budget: General Fund $3, 176, 395 Fire Improvement Bonds 100, 417 • TOTAL PROPOSED 1994 BUDGET $3,276, 812 2 ) RESOLVED that pursuant to Truth In Taxation legislation the following is certified to the County of Ramsey as the City of Mounds View' s proposed 1994 property tax levy after deduction of Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA) of $366,747 which the Minnesota Department of Revenue has certified the City will receive in 1994) : General Fund $1 , 481 , 506 Fire Improvement Bonds 100, 417 . TOTAL PROPOSED 1994 • PROPERTY TAX LEVY $1 , 581 , 923 RESOLUTION NO. 4284 PAGE TWO OF TWO 3) RESOLVED that a public hearing on the Proposed 1994 • Budget and the Proposed 1994 property tax levy will be held at 7: 00 p. m. on December 8, 1993 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 . Should it be necessary to adjourn the public hearing and continue it at a later date the reconvened hearing will be held at 7: 00 p. m. on December 15, 1993 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112. The motion for adoption of the above resolution was duly seconded .y tem:- - _ . _ - -- ., . . - . , Ayes Nays, said 'resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 13th day of September 1993. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator Tax comparison on selected residential homestead properties 09/09/93 located within the City of Mounds View. Proposed 1994 Levy( Includes $12,500 additional for NSYSB) Average increase Payable 1993 Payable 1994 Change in in Estimated Tax Capacity Rate Tax Capacity Rate Tax Rate Market Values 21.057% 26.504% 25.87% 2.30% 1993 1994 Estimated 1993 1993 Estimated 1994 1994 Percent Market Tax Net Market Tax Net Increase Increase Value Capacity Tax Value Capacity Tax (Decrease) (Decrease) $50,000.00 $500.00 $105.29 $51,150.00 $511.50 $135.57 $30.28 /yr 28.76% $72,000.00 $720.00 $151.61 $73,656.00 $753.12 $199.61 $48.00 /yr 31.66% $75,000.00 $780.00 $164.24 $76,725.00 $814.50 $215.88 $51.63 /yr 31.44% $84,000.00 $960.00 $202.15 $85,932.00 $998.64 $264.68 $62.53 /yr 30.93% $95,000.00 $1,180.00 $248.47 $97,185.00 $1,223.70 $324.33 $75.86 /yr 30.53% $100,000.00 $1,280.00 $269.53 $102,300.00 $1,326.00 $351.44 $81.91 Jyr 30.39% $110,000.00 $1,480.00 $311.64 $112,530.00 $1,530.60 $405.67 $94.03 Jyr 30.17% $125,000.00 $1,830.00 $385.34 $127,875.00 $1,837.50 $487.01 $101.67 /yr 26.38% SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 r PROS CONS * Dedicated and stable revenue * Places the burden of payment City-wide rather than on * Revenue which is under City perceived "affected" properties. control and not subject to legislative whims. * Non-traditional taxing source. * C•st taxpayers less than property * Eliminates opportunity for tax tax. deduction or circuit breaker. * Properties causing or contributing * Tax exempt properties would to the need for runoff have to pay -- schools/churches management pay into the will pass on the cost. management costs. * It's just another "TAX". * The charge is directly proportioned to runoff generated * It by-passes the assessment by specific class properties. procedure. • * Can work in conjunction with * "Not as accountable to the assessment procedures. public." * Provides for a funding * Additional initial administrative mechanism which earns interest costs. rather than pays interest (such as bonding). * Audited per State Law as are other-City utilities. * Exemption from the tax can be granted. There are no exemptions for property tax. * Expands the City's ability to • manage surface water in a way that does not interfere with budget peaks and valleys. • • • The cost savings with the utility vs. property taxes (per tax payer) may, in most cases, be greater than the amount saved by a tax deduction or circuit breaker. A 2/90 • 3. 5 FINANCING Paying for storm water management projects has become more complex in recent years. In the past, special assessments against benefited properties financed most of the necessary improvements. However, with recent legislation, the financial options have broadened considerably. The major categories of funding sources are Ad Valorem Taxes, - - " • - - , = - - - • -ssments, Use , nd Grants. Following is a description and financing principles used with each of these financing mechanisms. Table 3.4 identifies the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Ad Valorem A. General Taxes This is the most common method of generating revenues to finance general government services including minor maintenance measures for drainage and water quality facilities. Using property tax has the effect of spreading the cost over the entire tax base of a community. B. Special Tax District (M.S. 473.875 to 473. 883 ) This is similar to administrative structure under general taxation except that all or part of the community may be placed in the tax district. The principle is to better correlate improvement costs to benefited or contributing properties. Special Assessment •(M.S. 429) The City is familiar with the use of special assessments to finance special services from maintenance of sidewalks to construction of capital improvements. The assessments are levied against properties benefiting from the special services. The • philosophy of this method is that the benefited properties pay in relation to benefits received (increase in the market value of the property) . 3. 5 - 1 2/90 !II Building Permits, Land Development Fees & Land Exaction As land is developed or built upon, surface water runoff and pollution loading increases. Administrative and capital costs can be recovered at the time of building permit issuance or land development approval. The City can require dedication of land for ponding or drainage purposes. The land, however, must be from the parcel being developed. User Charges (M.S. 444.075) User charges, such as a storm water utility, is a mechanism by which a City can generate funds through billings similar to water and sewer billings. The principle in this method is to charge for services rendered to properties generating runoff, as well as the service to properties being protected from the effects of runoff, without consideration to an increase in market value of the property. 110 The utility approach is further detailed in a supplemental report, "Financing Storm Water Projects Using a Storm Water Utility, " under a separate cover. Grants State grants are available for surface water management and nonpoint source pollution. It is generally not a good financial practice to rely on grants for a service program because this source of revenue is not dependable and requires constant speculation as to its availability. Grants are useful but they should be used only to supplement a planned local revenue source. A. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Previously the MPCA had Federal matching funds for preserving and protecting lakes and for enhancing their public use and enjoyment, under the Federal Clean Lakes Program. MPCA is optimistic that funding will continue to • be available. Currently, MPCA is involved in the State Clean Water Partnership Program. This program will provide 3.5 - 2 2/90 . matching funds for lake improvement projects and non-point source pollution abatement. B. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) The MDNR has available funding through its Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance Program. The program provides financial support for planning and implementing structural and non-structural flood damage reduction measures. The program includes 50/50 matching funds through either a general fund or from a bonded fund. C. Minnesota State Board of Water and Soil Resources (MSBWSR) MSBWSR has limited matching funds available for erosion control projects. Table 3.4 illustrates the advantages and disadvantages of the different financing methods. 110 • 3. 5 - 3 0 . 0' a 0 04 41 44 44 4 X+ 4 4 4 V 0114 0E 44 0 ..1 ✓ 0 01 0 G 4+ 7 0 . U • w I W C • 7 0X+4 •X a .014 •02001 0.0 O a C w W 7 44 4+ 44 7 44.4 41 7 7 44 44+4'070q 0 14"0*01 X0t.7 47Vp 7�4.+ 04) 7 100 011 0 44 7 0'0 UW 4+• 4+ .04D 00A 4+ 000000 > 0 > 44 07+4 7 7 0 01 0 0+4 4 9 0 711 • 0-4 11 Ub .•4 .0 C 4) 0101 44 0 4+ 0 4 44 0.4 0.0 '.4 4 CW 0000 4.1000100107 01 '044.4 44 0.44 G 01 > 7 >rM 04X04++4OC 41 7 401 ro > 'AU0 4 7 O.4) ••.1 4 01 +1 44+4 N C 44+4 4+ 0.0 +4 N +4 2• a 41 4 4 4+ 710 4+ 07• '0�+ 7+1 vi +4 41 41 g_.0 241 • 044 0114i0U1 �0 001004)•977 •.84044X) 0' 1411440 u C44+al 0 0 = O 1.1444/ • Z 4044 47'044 .4O0 CO W114 4 • C ro 14 •y 41 -4 N Pl din .0 • '0 4 • 44 Z W e 4+ 44 • C 7 >. T. > W O O M O) 3 7 a w 444 U 7 •.. 13 M c O. 0a y G +44 4+ 00• #7•.040 34X 14 0+ 4.4 U 4, 44 1210 #74.fo 04 *01 O 004 • 000.• 4+ 44 440 74+ Owe R Q 7 0 0 4 4+ C 4++4 +4 O +4 3 • .. g Z o C 0 0. 4 44.00 0 04144 040+ >. a 44 44 • 4,X 0 N'0 441 a 0+444+ 0 0. a 2 44 40 4+ a '0041 70 .400 40 • c 04+ C 00'004 W 4 e000 012 W a W W+4 7 • 0C 444 • 4+ 447 44 4 G O +47 +4.444CU -4 OU44.-• 44 7 4 W 4 +4a v4+X02 4+4+ 0. +4 .4 00.- +4 • 74) +442 a-4U 00.7 T 447 LL 0 4+44444 4140 4400 +40 Xe C7 44 74) +400 +40.4 41'044U. 14 W 4 01 O1 0 4 0 4 +4 4 4.•.4 +4 a +4 C +4 0 01 C 0.4 .4 7 4 C 0 0 7 . O.4+.0 7 . C O.44 0 W 4) 0 44 %4+ 4+ • U 40 +g4 O. O W CO 7 .0 00440 0000 .-14+ 0 +4 > 440 C > 4440 41 'g 04 I > >.0.4 U 04. 00RI■ 0 t.0.010 $ 4101 V7 WO UM Nw2 .44044+1 00'0 im0 Z 4 = 44 = N .4 N M .0 03 .0 1` 03 .4 N N 44 Z N'0 4) 0 7 a Y4 0 • C ro UJ >.4.4 47+ 00 144) .Y la 04) 440 ,0 A CC C 0.44 701• ••04 bW 4)z L X >.4.4 1 4+ $ NC 44 C a 4 0 0 +4 W >. +4 01 - 0 4+ 0 44 0 • 0 0 LL C 2 0 w 4) X ro4 0 0 4 .4 • 4+4 W 4 0 0 0+4 O, +4 w 0 0-4 4+ 0 O.4+. 0.0 ■ 01 0.4 2 44 p LL � O 44 4+ 0 40 O.a 0.4+ Cl.C 4" +4 044 0 4 44 C N -4 0 C 00 W W 44+47 744+4 000+4 00.1 .44X Q Z 4) O W7ro > 0144 Cw-4 93 0+4.44+ • 410.0 70 5 1) 9 a +1014 .47 0 44 10 > 440/ a 0 0 44 44 LL a 44 101 0, 4+44 0001 40 + a 10 a >+144+ M 449 = O 0 0)04 7 3 01 7 0 41 4 7 0 000140 W O W 0 O • 7 w C w 4. 44 0 U O.4 C+4 • 14 N'O 44 44 v4 41 4 7 41 'O C 44+4 O 4+.4+4 14 • 14 404' 0 0 e C ro >4+ �y• 0 >4+ a0 X 0 W a+1 W V s >.C. 41 0 O 'O+1 W W .3 .4 440444 t4 414 01 0.070) C44) Ui 0.0+ 0 -O4 roMA 444+ 0 • '0 44 +4 U 4+4+ yL 01 W W g�.' >4.0 4 44 >.4+ a . $ +444 ro Z O)4. 444 00. 4440+4+0 07 304' 03X0V O >0 aw }a,. Z 4' Z5 0. 0.. .i m N .I N 115 ; Z 0. 14 a Q I 0 ..0 W.0 I 44-Q Z M.•4 .4 W 44 a .4 40.. 01 4+ w (n LL 0 • 0 4/ 14 �4+ X . as 0 a W 7 44 4+ '0 >. • 4ald 000 040 44 .044 '04) 0.0 CI C 44 0 9 4 +-'a 0 44 0 7X 7 • 44 W 0. 01740009 1. 0 0 '00 4 44 00 C 0 Q 2 +4 1. 4 U 01 ••4 C •4+ 4+ 7 Y 4 0 0 44 • 0 4414 444+ 00. '00 4++1 g2 OW 410. 44000 Z 4) 0-'' 0 41 a4X 0Z4X+ 0 a • * • OC+•O 4 44 0X -4'O • U 0 0+4 Q N 44+ 0 940+4 +4 4 4'47 0 9 44 0.44 7 04+ ro 4+4+ N .04 004444 30 +4 W U 014 • 14 4444 00+4 -4000 4 W 0 0 44+4 • +4 w 4++4 0 4 14 40+4 44 0 +4 44 0,44 44.4 (n 4 .4 U 4+ >.0. 4/ 0 > 41 0 1> 44 51 44 .0DI 44 07110 0 OC 44 0 4/ 41 0 I.0 .-1 +4 0 50701001014 0+47 04 440040.0+444 44) 4) 01440 +1 S.as +4'.441 074/ 0 Q w 000 X7100104+ 01 0340 .0V0 444 XU 02. Z1) 0O. 4) 1- O 44 . .4 N P) •41 Z y y N 417 a W Q 4 0 a • -74 0.0 4 +1 4 4+4+ 0 '0 0 .0+4 4.4 Q 0. 44 0 fa 4 0 0 0.+4 C C +4 4+ > 44 - 044 4-1 O 4+ +144 W 044 fa +44 • w L W 0 > 00.0 4 3 4) W • ..44 O•.C4 0 41 7 44 0 4444 a C 7 44 %«+' 0 U 4+44 14 N % 0 • > 0 0 44 0 4 0 • 0 0 +4 Tr % 7 C '0 O ro al >. M 0. 7 C W C 0 >+-4 ro 4440 4144 0. 4+ 00 0 4' 41 '4 • C 11 044 70 +44+ 0 C') y E. 4+ . 0 0 w 4+ 0. W 0 0 4+w 0 V +4 0 +4 0' 0 4++4 Oa O 7 N W .0 U 44 +4 7 0 44 4+ 4+ +4 C) W 9 0 .4' 0 W W 0 7 177+4 0 14 0 44 4+ -4 > 0 W - 7 41 a 4' 4+ • -1 W 44 041 00 44 .4 X70 3 41 7 4 4 4+ 0 U 7 W-4+4 0 U 4+ 4) 44 W 14 • --44 Oro+ 114 14'0 4+0 w 0 .�-4 4) .40.44 7 > 041 0 0 4) 44)) +444 0 +014 14147+7 04+++4 Q 04 0 0200 07 01 004 4410. m ZW04 2. 414 00 ..140+4.0 U0' F- a ,C '0 • • • • +1 • • a •2 .4 N - 4h a 0 .4 N P) d' 0 0 6/91 411 Table 3.5 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SUBWATERSHED DESIGNATION PRIORITY CORRECTIVE ACTION AA-5 High Long Lake Road storm sewer from Ardan Avenue North to dis- charge location at New Highway 10. AA-6 Low Feasibility Report regarding optimal wet- land management and function of the area located at Ardan Avenue and New Highway 10. The report should include a cost estimate, required sediment pond size, outlet structure modifications, land acquisition needs, address method of !II spreading flow uniformly across wetland and recre- ational benefits. AA-1 Future Remove Sediment from (F) north wetland located in Ardan Park. AA-2 Future Sherwood Road trunk (F) storm sewer. AA-3 Future New outlet pipe from the wetland to a_storm sewer on the west side of Groveland Park. AA-4 Future Upon completion of the Ardan Avenue trunk storm sewer, replace the existing outlet structure located north of Red Oak Court. The new outlet should be designed for minimum maintenance. 411 AA-5 Future Ardan Avenue trunk storm sewer. 3.2 - 3 3/92 411 Table 3.5 (Cont. ) SUBWATERSHED DESIGNATION PRIORITY CORRECTIVE ACTION GF-6 Future Ditch improvement on reach draining into Judicial Ditch No. 1 between Lois Drive and Hillview Road. 35W-3 Future Sediment Removal EW-1 High Feasibility study on optimal wetland manage- ment and function of the wetland located between Old Highway 10 and Silver Lake Road north of County Road I. Cost of con- struction can be born by the developer of the site. EW-7 High New outlet pipe from . wetland to Long Lake Road storm sewer system. EW-8 High Construction of a water quality improve- ment wetland at Long Lake Road and Ridge Lane. The basin was initially proposed in SEH report "Edgewood District Drainage Plan" ( 1988 ) . Feasibility and Construction Plans and Specifications under SEH Job #89271. EW-8 High Trunk storm sewer from Silverview Pond to Long Lake Road and County Road H2 (part of Long Lake Road storm sewer) . EW-10 High Trunk storm sewer from Long Lake Road and Ridge Lane to Woodcrest Drive and Irondale Road (part of Long Lake Road • storm sewer) . 3. 2 - 5 3/92 • Table 3.5 (Cont. ) SUBWATERSHED DESIGNATION PRIORITY CORRECTIVE ACTION EW-9 Future Repair, modify, and/ . or replace wetland outlet located near Woodcrest Drive and Ironwood Road. EW-10 Future Storm sewer from Clearview Avenue and Edgewood Drive to Clearview Avenue and Irondale Road. The storm sewer is required only if the County Road H2 storm sewer is constructed from Old Highway 10 to Long Lake Road. SC-2 Low Feasibility report regarding optimal wet- • land management and function of the area located east of Woodcrest Drive and Silver Lake Road. The report should include a cost estimate, required sediment pond size, outlet structure modifications, land acquisition needs, address method of spreading flow uniformly across wetland and recre- ational benefits. SC-4 Low Feasibility report on a sediment pond located south of Woodlake Drive between Pleasant View Drive. and Knollwood Road. The report should include: a cost estimate, required sediment pond size, outlet structure configura- tion, and land acquisition needs. 3.2 - 7 3/92 411 Table 3.5 (Cont. ) SUBWATERSHED DESIGNATION PRIORITY CORRECTIVE ACTION Plan Detailed review of Amendments local plan one year after approval. For the plan to be useful, it must change with the changing needs • ± .- . . .- . need not all be made at once. But desired plan amendments should be regularly recorded so that the appropriate plan changes can be made in an efficient manner. City Prepare handout guide- Administration lines for developers to use to meet the plan 411 standards. Establish storm water utility, including public information program, administration, etc. For overall maintenance, street sweeping, financing. Semi-Annual Inspections of each Inspections City wetland area twice a year (major areas after every rainfall ) . Results of inspections are tabu- lated and a punch list for public works is formulated. 3 . 2 - 9 6/91 • 4.3 MAINTENANCE GUIDE Mounds View, Minnesota Information for: Management Program for City Engineer Maintenance Guide Maintenance Personnel Revised December 1989 PRACTICE: Bi-annual inspection of all wetland areas and ditches. MINIMUM STANDARD: Brief walking inspection to record sediment buildup, skimmer and structure conditions, litter, vegetation, and visual water quality. PRACTICE: Street Sweeping MINIMUM STANDARD: Semi-annually, following snowmelt and in fall after leaves have fallen. PRACTICE: Catch Basin Cleaning. MINIMUM STANDARD: Frequency to prevent encroachment of sediment and debris above flow line of pipe. PRACTICE: Inspection of Direct Storm Sewer Discharge Points to protected wetlands or waterbodies MINIMUM STANDARD: Inspection on bi-annual basis and following targe storm events to _ _- from sediment and to observe the condition of any treatment facility if applicable. PRACTICE: Removal of Sediment. MINIMUM STANDARD: Based on bi-annual inspections, sediment shall be removed from areas where the • sediment impedes the flow path, from areas not designated for sediment 4.3 - 1 • • • • . • . . , NC-1 AB L A I N E;; ;;;;;_. ; _._ N . ........ .__.... ..... NW-i ............c....... -....... :.,i .............. ..... ' o •,...,...,,viA: , . • ,:,. _ . . _. . ••i.AA-1 " -.1 T.t! ....::;;;; •• ....••• ......... ..... ...... - ....... • ;! . ., .. . , •- ;, ,08..,: . , 1.• . .... .. ....... • •I0 -1›------31-----',-t->"--t4•7 1000 .i ::.C.t*,:<,'•;,'F'.. . ;; -171 . ;:7,-; ;i • . : : • . I i • .. -; •;:,•:; ,-, .: , •: 'i • -'..... .v....::::;.....o0;41...;:-. ,..i.............. 500 . Y •,•:: ,„„..-,. ,: • , :: -,;;;', ,- • ..- : .,• :-;.• . . . . -• ; X , . •i: ; ,,: ,1 - •,1,AA- i ,,,,,i '1,11 1i1Z11 1'1'1 . BLAINE Il 0 C / cL ,, • 1 • ;':i .,••i. ... r :, ,,,,• .... , c) , • ,, .. „..ii ,.. , „...) . ........,....„, ., ,„..,.... • ••••-I.:1,, ::: ...i AA-45 ,i6mir.a...oh 1 '1." :i ,• 1ir•,1,. • - • 114, ... .:.:.:.:J.U.41,1,1:.,:::.•'--*1-1(.1._.._. ........a.......Z:,...., -" ' . _.....-i 4:•}-, ;;; -t :...41:M1._•Ig: • ---J *;:."M-11! c • : -. __....._....., :'.: . .1 11 AA-il" 141 11 I 1 11 I\ lik ...........„........ I !I •- -- •'1'1'.1...1:.(11111;.. ... .---.1;--- ""-, - - - ,. - --,711 -1‘1.;,:if----1 --•-•""'1,?' _.... —I Z ; • ‘1.41 t.1-j1 11 1i 11 AI • i. M . . .. : X i .• ,.'! 11 1; ; 11 1,'• . • 1 • i I .,ei! ...------"'s I _, 1 4.,1 7;111 1P•1 111-ii U-I •; 4; ., ;y11 ..iii 11 0.: ;• :,I.i : !; A K v, . ; .; • . .:>•-', r---rnintrcznri i1 >•-•• , . .•-•1.---4 all •. k; -,11 .?.;I i ;i ., ; .. ", ; 0! , .. r:. ? -iiii5ni '"•;, • > tii•i;;4 • . , ,i i tv.,,,,,,, • Z W .V. • 1 :1 ""4 I 6 I t I _..., •- . • 1• ... . .-.-''.. - ...kw......;1 . '' . 1?------ '''''---•-•-• -—,r -• - - 1 1:1 •.1 ': ,.::.• ,; I 0 1: •• : --1! -I! 1 i 1,:i :::: S.'a ,13,:,i ,IA 35W-1 4:j tl ••..,... .11,. •;14 1 , *1 11 1. ,: 0• Ji ,i •• • !. .Or-6 i; in -,,.:i •,,,. V; 4 _ _;,..... .. ,,, I:.••-•• • • . ! i. ,( ,...,: •• . c;F 11 1; '.'.1.IW-Al..---, • 1 ..r.,1 i! ;;. ..; , , ; M ,,i ,., '. _ • i 111 I • '. R-----' ' !.!,•1 L.....r.:m..4.7-:...zzet ..i . 11 14, ,i - - •1&.-- 7 ••:--1- ' 1 , Z ••••?-t-)cw,L.,,i,.,-.;,, ,,,,,, : • I 11 1 ' ,..11 :, '1.' 1•• '4 _ i I ;I 11,. ., . .______., 1........1 —I ••••••••., .... .,,,,,., -14- •::. ".. '• ;i :•;11! 1; .i• I, . :12.1• :• 14 i '•'• -ID - • I m, '•1 i. i i • . •-e.1 . ....-.. ; :. .• . , . ... • , . . • > ; WC-1 4- A I i ..1•1„11::1.11;•; ;("..*:. ',I _7..-„....1.2..;.;:.7--7:v.i ii 1 i,1.1 I i! !:• •••fr ;‘...•11t;;;;L...1,11... •:‘: •:s.:i1:.. 1 A !: .. !f.-----------,:•.,.-1::-„c,\ .• • 1A1 1,1 ,. .111. 35W-411•140.. •-...„0.. -, 1::::.22,S4.2 It '•••••• .111 1i1g 4,—.1n:, •,,,,. .-.... ,,.. --i ..;•:".., ,:,.. Evol*W.!:.-,-;i4•6 \\ ) •I EW-6 V j I 1 i t‘.i I; ; . CZ) -'.-7, i! ': -- --:1--, .•-•- ; , . 'I• ..,.: ,..i. • . V it t.•:-.,t • l'iht',..,..t:t."-iLt.,...1., 'i.•:::.:s.,:.....-.. .-...,:.::..--..-...7:-,--.-.... :.'-, t.:':--.. .1-; 4:i !.....i.,, . , _ . . .......... ...... 1' -- t- .7----' • ‘..,..,.., y ;,,,i 1 ! „hit.:i.;,c1. . . SA--;• • ,• :i •--,,, • ;• SC-4 i i I,--11,.2,;=!,. ... . ,,v'..: ; P.iek 35W-3 ; A 11 11,1 .•''.-11:1 11 11g1 • .4-;:, / , ...:1:-..il...iigt.. .1..'. '. i/i .ri 'A..- • ; ...,.-•, 1, = -........ '' ;-,-7,- ›.. ;;1 ,Ii. 1. 'I d - . i• • ,. ', 1 r ',,,r/ ilLimairlirmannaftilitiL1 _... ................1 LA .141111.1 . IL • ... \... :1 -4 , _1 , • - ,• !. •••• : - , .....i SC- • •• :•••'•:•••_•::::: i L.:- - •:-::E ,k .-....71 I . ; .•••• •.., i •,, :;,:,, , ... A 8PN-4 '.; I BPN-1 - . • ,• ...... .... ,I. ••...... : 1 „.„.....2,:i, .... ....-.... i..... ,, :., : _...... ..,....,„..„::,._...._.1,1. •••• , . ,,- .,...,, .. • , TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ,n . FROM: SAMANTHA ORDUNO, CITY ADMI AT R DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1993 RE: INDEX FOR WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 - COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Regular Council Meeting - Monday, September 13, 1993 - 7:00 p.m. ITEMS PROVIDED IN THIS WEEK'S COUNCIL PACKET . This Is It! . Agenda Unapproved Minutes, August 25, 1993, Canvassing Board Meeting Unapproved Minutes, August 23, 1993, Regular Council Meeting . Approved Minutes ****************** ADMINISTRATOR'S SCHEDULE (Please note that this schedule is subject to change as meetings are scheduled, rescheduled or canceled. At any time Audrey, Michele, or Tim C. will have my most current schedule and a number where I can be reached at all times.) Monday, September 13 10:00 a.m. Meeting with Architects NOON Managers Luncheon 7:00 p.m. Regular Council Meeting Tuesday, September 14 9:00 a.m. Pipeline Safety Meeting 1 :00 p.m. Department Head Meeting 7:00 p.m. Town's Edge Board Meeting MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE TWO SEPTEMBER 8, 1993 Wednesday, September 15 NOON Luncheon with Bob Long 2:00 - 10:00 p.m. FOCUS Meetings Thursday, September 16 10:00 a.m. - 1 :30 p.m. Fire Department Meeting Friday, September 17 b:\index.913 DOCUMENT COM MICATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY This is to certify that the microfilm appearing on the film -file from the RECORD SERIES TITLED: COUNCIL MINUTES STARTING WITH AND ENDING WITH is an accurate and complete reproduction of records of the following agency: DEPARTMENT: MOUNDSVIEW, CITY OF DIV.:ADMINISTRATION DELIVERED TO THE UNDERSIGNED BY: MICHELLE SEVERSON The legal custodian of said records, who affirmed that such records were microfilmed by the undersigned in the regular course of business pursuant to established policy of the above agency to maintain and preserve such records through the storage of microfilm reproduction in protected locations. It is further certified that photographic processes used for microfilming of the above records were accomplished in a manner and on microfilm which meets with the requirements of the National Bureau of Standards for permanent microphotographic copy. (Camera Operator Roll/Fiche Number Camera Reduction Ratio Date Produced 29:1 U_IN_97 ADJACENT DOCUMENT WAS SUPPLIED BY AGENCY NAMED BELOW. DURING THE REGULAR COURSE OF BUSINESS, TO BE FILMED BY STATE OF MINNESOTA MICROGRAPHIC SERVICES UNIT ACCORDING TO NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS REQUIREMENTS FOR PERMANENT MICROFILM AND ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES FOR THE DOCUMENT SERIES. Record Series Titled COUNCIL MINUTES IMOUNDSVIEW, CITY OF Microfilmer Signature Date Icamera Reduction Ratio 1 29:1 A 0 ., Ie 1m <) 2 1 �....._.r ......................... 1 plLw.. .V9^1\\\-.Ir n. .. Vo..lu. .n prr Y.•.ur.r.m ... 69t a.m.\ � a 9m 1699 Z.nnn 6.R.y Vw. Fw16tl1 Jolly Mn. 0. . a pl Geneve - a e 9 m 16 a 9 •. Zenith %-Ray Voice F h 111 Ibnl N. - a e g In i b e 9 •; hnnh \.Rae \'ulcr i a'ttr 10 lit 'J)'Jim—itor - a 0gin 1 68 311M MICROFONT - A E G M 1 6 f O1.8 line pair/mm 2.5 line pair mm. 1= 12 125 L. ag !m 12.2 1� III12_0 B 101 1 ' C6111 Its m1 j�_i us ra t �t E- E .... ..,,..............,...Y "G .......nn.. revere. Rry V....e\I a1= 6 6p1 a.mn•u9m1lH'. tM11R 6Aq Ypk pl',• .r ml•.+:/rnuL lFn Gn apt Geneve - a a gm 1669%Zen a9— m b in pent lac •a e g In I b b 41; Zenith N t1 O E D rrrr ozRI 9. r .! r r. y IN F ! w - BELL WELL =_ zz ZZ 96 1�1 ZL 0 N lu ROTARYCAMERA - )err szl ezl c+ TEST CHART = 1 M-777 FORM 9075003A 0 MICROGRAPHICS SERVICES UNIT T3 d RECORDS MANACEMENT DIVISION DEPARTMENT OI' ADMINISTRATION Many Documents Are: LFvL7,jA. Of Poor Quality 013. Photocopies MC. Carbon Copies ®D. Photographs NE. Filmed Out Of Normal Density Range R%1-000/1-01 NoII(v of Pour 1rf.flfly Doclrmnls Sep. Grnber l3. /993 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 7:00 P.M. AGENDA The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by staff and appointed commissions, committees and boards. Decisions are based on this information, as well as City policy and practices, input from constituents and a Councilmember's personal judgement. If you have comments, questions or information regarding an item on the agenda, please step forward to be recognized by the Mayor during the "Residents Requests and Comments From the Floor" item on the agenda. please state your name and address for the record. All comments are appreciated. A copy of all printed materials relating to the agenda item is available for public inspection at the Recording Secretary's Table. 1, CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. OATH OF OFFICE Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, to Administer Oath of Office to Council member -Elect, Julie Trude. WELCOME ABOARD, JULIEHM 4. ROLL CALL - _ Linke _ Quick _ Wuori Trude — Blanchard 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 25, 1993 Canvassing Board Meeting COUNCIL ACTION: A T D AGENDA PAGE TWO SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 August 23, 1993 Regular Meeting COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: Special "Salute to Youth" Award to Tri•City Red Baseball Team (Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator) CONSENT AGENDA: A. Consideration of Resolution No. 4417 Approving an Interfund Budget Transfer, Staff Report No. 93-621C (Carla Asleson, Recycling Coordinator) B. Adopt Resolution No. 4416 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds C. Award P.id to Bacon's Electric for $2,900.00 to be Transferred irc:n. �—ontingency Account No. 1004500-910 to Account No. 1004190- 121, Staff Report No. 93-614C, (Mike Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor) D. Set Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m., September 27, 1993, to Consider Request for Conditional Use Permit (oversized accessory building), Donald Pederson, 8368 Spring Lake Road, Planning Case No. 368-93 E. Set Public Hearing for 7:10 p.m., September 27, 1993, to Consider Request for Conditional Use Permit (car wash), Gateway Foods, 2390 Highway 10, Planning Case No. 362-93 Consideration of Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement for the Fire Training Association, Staff Report No. 93.620C AGENDA PAGE THREE SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 G. Licenses for Approval Sewer and Water - Expires 6130/94 Gartman Mechanical - New HVAC - Expires 6/30194 Dean's Heating and Air Conditioning - New Roofing - Expires 6/30194 Dan Kenton Roofing - New COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: B. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR Citizens' comments are encouraged to allow individual citizens to address the Council, as a whole, on a matter of interest or concern to the citizens. The preservation of the Citizens' Comments item on the agenda is important in order to encourage and maintain this information flow. To preserve and protect this valuable communications link, a speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. 7:05 p.m. Continuation of Public Hearing to Consider Request for Conditional Use Permit to Allow The Continued Use of a Temporary Structure at 7901 Red Oak Drive, Planning Case No. 366.93, Staff Report No. 93-615C, (Staff Presenter: Paul Harrington, City Planner) - Resolution No. 4409 Approving/Denying Request for Conditional Use Permit to Allow The Continued Use of a Temporary Structure at 7901 Red Oak Drive COUNCIL ACTION: AGENDA PAGE FOUR SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Comments: b. 7:06 P.M. Continuation of Introduction of Ordinance No. 528, Repeal of Sunset Provision of Street Light Utility, Staff Report No. 93-616C, (Staff Presenter. Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator) - Ordinance No. 528 Repealing the Sunset Provision of the Street Light Utility COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: to. COUNCIL BUSINESS: A. Continuation of Action on Ordinance No. 529 Establishing a Surface Water Utility and Amending Mounds View Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 73, Staff Report No. 93-617C, (Staff Presenter. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator) COUNCIL ACTION: ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor Linke Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Quick Councilmember Trude Councilmember Wuori Comments: B. Consideration of Approval of Contract Documents for Proposed City Hall Expansion, Staff Report No. 93-618C, t,Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator) AGENDA PAGE FIVE SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 COUNCIL ACTION: A T D C. Consideration of Certifying the 1994 Proposed Operating Budget, Tax Levies and Setting the Date for a Public Hearing on the Same Pursuant to Truth in Taxation Legislation, Staff Report No. 93.619C, (Staff Presenter. Don Brager, Finance Director) COUNCIL ACTION: 11. REPORTS: 1. Report of Councilmembers: Blanchard: Wuori: Quick: Trude: 2. Report of Mayor Linke: AGENDA PAGE SIX SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Report of Administrator: 4. Report of Staff: 5. Report of Attorney: NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION: OCTOBER 4, 1993, 7:00 P.M. NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: SEPTEMBER 27, 1993, 7:00 P.M. 11. ADJOURNMENT: b:\ag.S13 APPROVE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY. MINNESOTA Regular Meeting September 13, 1993 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 CALL TO ORDER The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor Linke at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, September 13, 1993. PLEDGEE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was said. OATH OF OFFICE Samantha Orduno, City administrator, administered the Oath of Office to Councilmember-Elect; Julie Trude. Trude was welcomed to the Council by the Mayor and Councilmembers. Bill Frits, 9072 Long Lake Road, stated that the City Council is incorrectly saying the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Linke, Councilmembers Wuori, Blanchard, Trude, and Quick. MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Don Brager, Finance Director -Treasurer; Paul Harrington, City Planner; Mike Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor; Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City administrator; Jim Thomson, City Attorney Mayor Linke announced that Dick Schmidlin, the City's mechanic and 15 year employee, passed away on the afternoon of September 13, 1993. Mayor Linke described some of the duties that Dick performed as a City employee. Mayor Linke also stated that the City Hall flag will be flown at half staff until after Dick's funeral in his honor and that city Hall will be closed for the funeral. Mayor Linke stated that Dick will be greatly missed by all. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting APPROVAL OF MINUTES Page Two September 13, 33 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to approve minutes of August 25, 1993, Canvassing Board Meeting as presented. VOTE: 4 ayes 1 abstention 0 nays Motion Carried MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Wuori to approve minutes of August 23, 1993, Regular Council Meeting, as presented. VOTE: 3 ayes 2 abstentions 0 nays Motion Carried SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: Mayor Linke introduced and read Resolution No. 4419, "Salute to Youth" Award to Tri-City Red Baseball Team. MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Quick to adopt Resolution No. 4419, "Salute to Youth" Award to Tri-City Red Baseball Team '/OTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Linke presented this award on behalf of the City to the Coach, Mark Kalata, and the manager, Elmer Buttweiller, of the Tri-City Red Baseball Tean for a job well done. CONSENT AGENDA Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, read the Consent Agenda. Mayor Linke asked if there were any items the Council desired removed from the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Trude asked that Item F., Consideration of Amendment to the Joint Powers .Agreement for the Fire Training Association, be removed from the Consent Agenda for further discussion. MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Trude to adopt the Consent Agenda minus Item F. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Blanchard to Table the Consideration of Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement for the Fire Training Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, explained that in December of 1990, the previous Council had entered into a Joint Powers Agreement with Brooklyn Center, Blaine, Fridley, Spring Lake Park and Columbia Heights to construct a Fire Training facility. Blaine, Mounds View a ' Spring Lake Park were considered as one entity in regards to this project. Orduno stated that $50,000 had been set aside out of the bond issue for the training facilit_ Since that time Columbia Heights has opted out of the Joint Powers Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Page Three September 13, 1993 Agreement. This agreement would be amended to delete any reference to Columbia Heights and also amend the cost from $200,000 to $150,000 as the City's share. The most recent information is that construction has begun in some form. Orduno stated that as a provision of the Agreement, all decisions were delegated to the Chief's Committee which is comprised of all of the Chiefs from the cities listed above. The cities had not been informed of any decisions regarding this facility. Mayor Linke stated that he is asking that this item be tabled so that it can be discussed further before Mounds View signs the document. Mayor Linke stated that he would like to see more control put into the agreement involving the cities. Linke stated that the Joint Powers Agreement gives the cities no control as to how the funds are spent. Mayor Linke stated that all cities have not signed off on the Agreement, therefore, it could be amended and resigned by the City that has already approved it. Orduno stated that any amendments to the Joint Powers Agreement that Mounds View makes would have to be given to the other cities. Orduno stated that per the Agreement Fridley is the operating agent and that Fridley was also unaware of the status of the construction of the facility. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR There were no requests nor comments from the residents at this meeting concerning any issues not on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS ------ �, tuc �.u.r. — I—. --- pax Orive Mayor Linke opened the continuation of the public hearing to consider the request for Conditional Use Permit to allow the continued use of a temporary structure at 7901 Red Oak Drive at 7:17 p.m. Paul Harrington, City Planner, explained that this public hearing was continued from the August 23, 1993 meeting to afford the Council more time to review the request. Harrington stated that in 1988 the applicant had made application for a conditional use Permit to allow for a temporary portable clas_room on the premises located at 7901 Red Oak Drive which the City Council approved. This Conditional Use Permit would sunset after a five year period. The applicant is asking for a continued use of the portable classroom. The Planning Commission reviewed this request and recommended it be approved with contingencies. Mayor Linke stated that he would like to add an additional contingency to the already proposed contingencies which would be to pave the parking lot under the temporary structure upon its removal. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Mounds View City council Page Four Regular Meeting Seotember 13, MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Quick to Adopt Resolution No. 4409 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for a Temporary Portable Classroom for Church Upon the Rock, 7901 Red Oak Drive, As Amended, by Adding a Fourth Contingency which States that the Parking Area Under the Temporary Structure Be Paved Upon Its Removal MOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Councilmember Trude added that the Church Upon the Rock stated that they have plans to move. Paul Harrington stated that Church Upon the Rock is pursuing other sites, not necessarily in Mounds View. Harrington also stated that Church Upon the Rock was not able to secure a site prior to this class year, but will be relocating immediately after this school year. Continuation of Introduction of ordinance No. 528 - Street Light Utility Mayor Linke stated that in his discussions with the residents regarding budgets for utilities, he found that many of the residents didn't understand the process of how taxes were arrived at. Mayor Linke gave a presentation on how taxes are derived and gave examples of how business, commercial, residential and apartment taxes affect one another. Also included in thi- presentation was how the street light, proposed storm water utility and property tax numbers were arrived at. Mayor Linke used metro -wide numbers to show how the tax dollars varied. Mayor Linke also commented on the number of residents in Mounds View who would benefit from itemizing their property taxes on Schedule A or deducting their federal taxable income. Mayor Linke stated that he contacted the IRS and found that approximately 20 percent of the residents in Mounds View itemize their taxes which is approximately 562 residents. Mayor Linke stated that when he thought about the different ways and means of raising $72,000 he had to find a way that would be of benefit to the City as a whole, not just to a portion of the City residents. Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, thanked Mayor Linke for his presentation, but stated that using metro -wide numbers really didn't show how Mounds View was affected. Ruth White, 2917 County Road I, brought up the fact that many people take advantage of itemizing their property taxes, the circuit breaker, or refund programs. Ms. White stated she is opposed to having anything placed on utility bills. Ms. White prefers additional taxes be placed on her property tax. Councilmember Trude stated that many taxpayers do use the renters' credit, filing form MPR-1, which subsidizes a portion of the rent whether or not they itemize on their tax returns. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Page Five September 13, 1993 Mayor Linke stated that these credits do not make up the difference saved between taxes and utilities. Councilmember Trude stated that whether a person itemizes or not depends on the age of the homeowner because newer homeowners often have very large deductions for their mortgage interest payments. Mayor Linke stated that earnings are the key to whether a person itemizes or not. Mayor Linke stated he does not itemize because he doesn't have enough deductions, and yet, he has two mortgages, one at 17%. Duane ,McCarty stated that the County sets the market values for the properties and that there is a methodology used that maintains continuity of fairness within the system. Mayor Linke spent a great deal of time on the phone with Ramsey County personnel discussing how the valuation for properties was set. Mayor Linke stated that Ramsey County explained that the market value is derived from a random sampling of homes being sold in the community. Homes at the time of the valuation that was being discussed were selling for $120,000, but these were new homes being sold. This is what was driving up the market value. McCarty stated that under the law it can't work that way. McCarty stated that the County uses sales comparisons for like properties. Mayor Linke stated that the average sale price of homes in Mounds View is what was used. McCarty stated that this is a job for the City Attorney perhaps. Councilmember Trude stated that when she was out talking to people many of them had received 101 increases in their home market valuations and were very unhappy. Mayor Linke stated that he called Ramsey County to discuss market values regarding properties and could not get the County to return his calls. Finally, Mayor Linke stated that he called Terry Schutten's office. Don Brager, the City's Finance Director also called and his calls were never returned. Councilmember Trude stated that market values determine the amount of taxation. Mayor Linke stated that he was told by Ramsey County that many residential properties went down, but when he talked to residents he couldn't find even one person whose property taxes went down. Roger Stigney, 8400 Eastwood Road, stated that the comparison that the Mayor made was user fees versus taxes, but there are other means such as special assessments. Stigney stated that one of the other factors in placing the Mounds View City Council Page Six Regular Meeting September 13, 33 utility tax on the property taxes is that it gives accountability to the residents. Mayor Linke stated that this utility also would be accountable to the residents. There are public hearings throughout the entire budget process. This utility would be identical to the sewer and water utilities and would be approved at the same time as the budget. Mr. Stigney stated that the five Councilpersons make the decisions on these items, whether a public hearing is held or not. Mayor Linke stated that the five Councilpersons are elected by the City as a whole and make the decisions for the best interest of the community as a whole. Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator, stated that this item had been continued from the August 23, 1993 meeting to give the new Councilmember time to review the ordinance. This ordinance had been given a sunset date to look at the rates and reconstruct the utility as a whole. Any action that the Council takes will only continue or discontinue the utility. The Council can either waive the reading and approve the introduction or move to deny the approval of the introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Trude stated that it was helpful to have more time to study the utility. Councilmember Trude stated that while she was campaigning residents expressed concern because of the darkness and the rate of vandalism and crime. These persons were basically in the southwest portion of the City. Trude stated that there is a need for more streetlights, however, stated that she had a problem with the rate of the utility. Ms. Trude suggested that the Council should follow the Charter and set just and reasonable rates. This utility budget has $25,000 to date and there will be a $55,000 surplus by the end of the year. Ms. Trude stated that she would like to see the rate cut in half. Councilmember Blanchard stated that this ordinance should be sunsetted. $25,000 was collected this year and by the end of this year there will be a total of $50,000. Blanchard stated that at the time that this ordinance went into effect it was assumed that it would be used for streetlights. The City only received six requests for streetlights. Blanchard stated that with the electric and gas franchise fee, the City is taxing the people twice. Blanchard stated that it is not ethical. Blanchard suggested that perhaps one month of the franchise fee could be dedicated to the streetlight fund if funds are needed for streetlights. Mayor Linke asked Councilmember Blanchard if what she was saying was to sunset the utility fee and place the amount to be raised on the taxes. Mayor Linke stated that the need is $50,000. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Page Seven September 13, 199" Councilmember Blanchard stated that quarterly the City raises alo,u— a11� spend approximately 515,000, This means that there still is something coming in on utility. It is not right to tax the residents twice. Councilmember Trude stated that this utility could be abandoned for one year and looked at again and the fee could be adjusted. Councilmember Blanchard utilitycouldebethat after one reconsidered. year, Blanchardtstated thatwould mthe necessary, the utility City is taxing the residents twice, once with the electric franchise an once on the streetlight utility. counci:lmember Trude stated that she would like to ask Mr. Brager how wise it would be to spend down the fund and then reconsider it later. Mayor Linke stated that when this utility Went in o effect too theand rates were set, now because of an excess, the rates appear rates could be at perhapsfthee$14r00tratehisutoolty high. Mayor 1Linke statedthathe states that would not like to see the utility eliminated altogether. Councilmember Quick stated that, at the last Work Session, the Police Department was asked to relook at where there is a need for street lights in the City. Councilmember Quick stated that the Council should proceed prudently and look at the list of where street lights are needed. Councilmember Trude stated that the need for streetlights in the City ie City s not ts in thst portion oftotally a crime problem.`hThe is uresitynto theirebilltasethey don't have street complained about adding lights and are paying for them. Mayor Linke stated that each year in the newsletter there is an article on streetlights and how residents should go about getting that information to the City. Councilmember Quick stated that every year the state changes rules and we have to adjust every year. Councilmember Quick stated that the City should prudently move forward with street lights and evaluate the situation before making hasty decisions. Councilmember Blanchard stated again that this ordinance should be sunsetted. Councilmember Blanchard stated that this utility was to be a temporary fix until the franchise fee came into effect, now, with the franchise fee and utility the residents are being taxed twice. Mayor Linke stated that the City uses $125,000 of the franchise fee for taxes. Orduno stated that the City is receiving $200,000 per year assuming 1991 was an average year. .Orduno stated that in speaking to NSP, the fund will down considerably because of the cool summer this year. The fee collected Mounds view City Council Page Eight Regular Meeting September 13, 13 for 1992 should be between $170,000 and $190,000. Orduno explained that for a January billing the City won't receive any funds until March. This means the City only receives 10 months worth of payments in 1993. Councilmember Wuori stated that she strongly agreed with Councilmember Trude's evaluation. There are areas in the City that do need street lights. Many residents have not gone through the process and let the City know that they need a street light. At the last Council Work Session the City Council decided to become more proactive in regards to placement of streetlights. There is a need for $50,000 if the City is to be more proactive, but after w that point it may drop down. The rate could be rearranged or changed on a yearly basis which would be a big budget item each year. Councilmember Wuori stated'that she was in favor of keeping the utility and becoming more proactive with regard to street lights and adjusting the rate on a yearly basis. Bill Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, stated that he is in opposition to this street light utility. Mr. Werner stated that he felt the City conned the public with the fact that this street light utility would be sunsetted in two years. Werner stated that now it will continue like all of the others and will go on forever. Mr. Werner questioned the Council as to the need for funding for extra lights when there is currently money in the account. Mayor Linke stated that there is a surplus in the account. There was no track record for this utility in the beginning and the rate is too high. The rate can now be adjusted. Bill Werner stated that the rate should drop to zero, however, then the Council would have to start all over to convince the people. Mayor Linke stated that if the money isn't raised through a street light utility, then it would have to go on the taxes. Bill Werner asked the Council if it is easier to convince the residents to spend money in an already existing account or tax them for it. Mayor Linke stated that the City would still have to pay $53,000 for electric to run the lights and maintain them. The City has $50,000 in that account but what happens to the next year. Mayor Linke stated that he does not think one year at a time, but five to 10 years in advance. Mayor Linke stated that the City would like to be fiscally sound in five years. Bill Werner stated the funding should go on the taxes. If the clever financing methods and user fees continue, there will be 40 more sp?cial funds. Councilmember Trude stated that the utility is a tax and now the decision is what manner of taxing should be used -- should the City spend down the account or keep it as a reserve and adjust the rates to match the costs. Trude stated that the City is conservative and has always tried to have a safety cushion so as not to have to borrow funds. Mounds View City Council Page Mine Regular Meeting September 13, 1993 Maja Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, stated that in the last two years the City has imposed a utility fee, imposed a franchise tee for gas and electric and now are proposing an additional fee for a surface water management utility. If a Mounds View taxpayer were to sit down and add up these fees on a yearly basis and had that amount placed on property taxes he would scream "bloody murder". The City continues to put more and more fees on the taxpayers. Ms. Werner stated that it was her belief that this was the wrong philosophy. Mayor Linke stated that the taxpayers would be paying more if this amount would be put on their taxes than they are paying on a utility fee. Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, stated that the Council and staff should get into a retreat as soon as possible. Mr. McCarty suggested that the Council pull back on these additional charges and calculate the amount to be placed on the 1994 taxes and then get citizens involved and make the FOCUS 2000 :cork. Mr. McCarty stated at this rate the residents are building up resentment for the Council and it will continue until the Bel -Rae will he filled again. The "hidden taxes" will not work. Mayor Like stated that. the tax rate can be adjusted now, however, in the beginning there was io track record to go by as far as rates are concerned. McCarty stated that Councilmember Wuori stated that the City Council has decided to take a more proactive stance on street lights. Mayor Linke stated that the installation of street lights is based on resident requests and petitions just as it was when Mr. McCarty was Mayor. Mayor Linke was not at the Work Session in which the proactive stance was discussed, but stated that it is time to become more proactive with regard to the street lights. The Council has requested that the Police earmark high crime areas and the City can be more proactive and put in street lights •where they are needed. Duane McCarty stated that the Council has to take a proactive stance and use the talents and energies of his staff. McCarty stated that this has not been done in the past. McCarty stated that the Council should back off and come back to the residents with a proactive plan -- a plan to get support of the community. Mayor Linke stated that he is not in favor of putting in a street light where it is not wanted by the residents just because the Police have earmarked that location for a street light. Duane McCarty stated that if the area is a high crime area and the Police have suggested a street light be put in to aid in the reduction of crime, the citizens will more than likely come forth and support the placement. Mr. Werner asked if the street light atility fund is a designated or undesignated fund. Page Ter. Mounds View City Council September 13, 93 Regular Meeting Mayor Linke stated that the street light utility fund is a designated fund and those monies are collected and expended for the purpose of street light operation and maintenance. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, stated that the City doesn't have an undesignated fund for long. Most of time the surplus from an account is designated promptly. Ed Werdien, 6940 Silver Lake Road, asked why the City is taking $200,000 from the water and sewer fund to put an expansion on the City Hall building. Mr. Werdien stated he read this in The Bulletin. Mr. Werdien suggested letting the rates go down and don't do any work on the City Hall building. Mr. Werdien stated that the building needs no expansion. Mr. Werdien stated that Mounds View has the highest water and sewer rates around. The only City lower is Lino Lakes. Orduno stated that there is a certain amount to be transferred from one fund and placed in another. Naja Werner read from The Bulletin the following, "Currently, the city hall building fund has a $371,000 balance. The additional money for the project will be transferred from the city's general, sewer, water and undesignated funds." Naja Werner questioned, "what is a designated fund"" �,rduno explained that a designated fund is a fund where the money that goes into it is designated to buy equipment and services for a certain program. These funds can be transferred from one fund to another. In times where there are undesignated funds or surplus funds where the City has spent less than budgeted, those funds are undesignated until they are designated. Naja Werner stated that then if there were a certain amount of money for sewer and the taxpayer thinks it is being used for sewer, the Council can actually use it elsewhere. Mayor. Linke stated that if the money were to be taken out of water it would be use.: for something to do with that department. Orduno explained that the rates are lower in New Brighton because of the army settlement that happened years ago and the money is used to buy down sewer and water rates. Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, stated that a sunset was provided on this utility so that the utility could come to an end so that the City could assess what had taken place and go on from there. Mr. Frits stated that now is the time to end the utility and assess its success or failure. Mayor Linke stated that the rate is morn than what is requested because there now is a track record. If the street light utility were to continue the rate could now be lowered. Mayor Linke stated that he has been thatothe to sunsetting this utility since the very beginning. mounds View City Council Regular Meeting sunset provision was put into the utility so a discussic This utility has worked and has actually worked to well. assess the rates. Page Eleven September 13, 1993 It is now time to Naja Werner stated that there is a $5o.0oo surplus. If the rate isn't changed, the City will continue to build up a surplus in the fund and the Council can take this surplus amount of money in the fund and use it as they choose. Werner stated that projects could be completed such as expanding City Hall more. Werner stated that the taxpayers need to know that the council can do what they want with the surplus money even if the taxpayers would be opposed to what is being done. Mayor 1inke stated that the rate setting of this utility would be part of the public hearing process for the budget. Ruth White, 2917 County Road I, stated that she is opposed to this utility. Ms. White stated that she doesn't share the same user fee philosophy as the Council likes. Ms. White states these user fees are taxes. Ms. White stated that when she thinks of a user fee she thinks of a fee that she pays to use the park or the golf course. The needed amount of money should be put on property taxes. Ms. White stated that she doesn't think that the Council should tell her what is best for her. Ms. White stated that she itemizes and gets money back on her taxes. Ms. White stated that the sunset clause was put on so that the utility would be more acceptable and compatible to the people. Ms. White stated that in the past the general fund was used for City street lights and it should come from that fund again. Mayor Linke then asked Ms. White if the water and sewer should also come from the general fund. Ruth White stated that she gets a bill for the water and sewer because she is using the water and sewer. Ms. White stated that she considers the utility fee a maintenance fee. Ms. White also asked if this street light fee was used for County roads. Mayor Linke responded that the Countv takes care of County roads and this utility is not used on those roads. Duane McCarty stated that the water and sewer charges are the funding mechanism which runs the water and sewer department and are billed separately and that can be monitored by the residents. Mayor Linke stated that the street light utility can also be monitored and it does appear on the same bill as the water and sewer. Duane McCarty stated that it appears on the billing in a three letter code and that, in his opinion, 20 percent of the residents don't know what the code stands for. McCarty stated that he feels the residents think it is a 4alid charge for sewer and water operations. McCarty stated that he had to call City hall to have the code deciphered. Page Twelve Mounds View City Council September 13, 3 Regular Meeting Mavor Linke closed the public hearing for the street light utility at 8:50 p.m. Councilmember Trude suggested that this ordinance be amended to adjust the rates to be just and reasonable. Councilmember Quick stated that the introduction of the ordinance could be approved at this meeting and amended at the next meeting upon the next vote. Bill Frits called for a Point of Order. Mr. Frits stated that the Council was having a discussion with no motion on the floor. processes that an Mayor Linke stated that there are two =ccessnis recitseives. One of the processes is its introduction and the other p adoption and there has to be a 14 day span between the two actions. Bill Frits stated that during the public hearing the Mayor called the residents to order. Orduno stated that there is nothing in the Statehee laws that rehasre an ordinance to have a first and second reading. adoption 14 days apart. More and more cities are introduction and its moving towards these terms regarding ordinances. MOTION�Np: Quick/Wuori to Approve the Introduction of Ordinance No. 528, Reoeal of Sunset Provision of Street Light Utility and Waive the Reading of the Same 1 nay Motion Carried VOTE: 4 ayes COUNCIL BUSINESS A. MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Quick to Remove from the Table the Continuation of Action on Ordinance No. 529 Establishing a Surfachapter Water Utility and Amending Mounds View Municipal code by Adding 73 s Motion Carried VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed Staff Report No. 93-617C Regarding Continuation of Action on Ordinance No. 529 Establishing a Addin Surface Water Utility andFAmending Mounds View ustM231cipal Councilcode Meeting, the Chapter 73. Orduno reported that at the he September 13 the continuation of City Council tabled to the meeting P action on Ordinance No. 529. In the interim time, staff was to examine en of an alternative rate structure which would lessen the Rocburky Keene,the charges to the City's business community. Rocky Elliott -Hendrickson developed an alternative rate structure and presented it for Council review at the September 7 Work Session. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Page Thirteen September 13, 1993 Orduno reported that the original rate structure is included in the packet as Scenario 1. The alternative rate structure is attached as Scenario 2 which would raise the yearly residential household cost by 5.91. This rate structure would raise the yearly costs for church and school property classifications. Orduno asked Rocky Keene and Mike Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor, to do a presentation on the projects listed in the surface water utility. This will include impacts on certain areas of the city and on the City as a whole. Staff does not have a recommendation on this ordinance. The options would be to adopt or not adopt the ordinance. The rate structure would be formally set by resolution. The Council is at the adoption stage and it would be a roll call vote. Rocky Keene, hydrologist from SEH, the cities consulting engineers, gave a definition of the projects listed in the Local Water Management Plan. Keene reported that the Council, during the past five years, as a result of the Long Lake Road reconstruction, asked SEH to complete two studies to see what impacts certain drainage areas would have on the Long Lake Road project. One was the Ardan Avenue drainage district and the other is the Edgewood drainage district. Mr. Keene listed those projects that were identified that would need to be constructed in association with Long Lake Road and those that were impacted by the Long Lake Road Project. Mr. Keene stated that SEH worked with City staff when the plan was written to determine some projects that have to be done in addition to the others throughout the City. Most of these projects are maintenance projects such as storm sewer outlets, outlet modifications, and sedimentation ponds, and controlling the City's water quality. Keene reported that the final area that was looked at in the Plan was the feasibility studies. The purpose of these studies are related to wetland issues. All the wetland issues have had a feasibility study connected to them. There are other projects includinc street sweeping, general maintenance of the storm sewer system and general cleaning listed in the Plan. Ditch cleaning, catch basin repair and cleaning, street sweeping is an important water quality aspect which could also be funded by the Plan. Wetlands are another important issue and, therefore, sedimentation removal should be a part of the Plan. Mr. Keene gave a history of the City's storm sewer structure. Much of this system was built in the 19501s. A major portion of the storm sewer was constructed for sanitary sewer and not necessarily for storm water drainage. The total construction of future projects identified in the Plan will cost $1.2 million. The only projects to take place within the next five years are the feasibility studies. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Page Fourteen September 13, ' 13 Mayor Linke stated that the storm water plan that was proposed in 1978 and it was several millions of dollars, where this Plan looks at completing the wetlands and utilizing the wetlands to fill the needs that were identified. The Plan looks at these projects over a period of time. The Plan is a proactive plan for the future. Councilmember Trude read the 1978 Citizens' Task Force report and a lot of the currently proposed projects come from what citizens wanted in the 170s. Ditch cleaning and pond cleaning have not been kept up due to lack of money. Trude stated her big concern was the projects and whether they are all justified. Rocky Keene stated that one of the major concerns was water quality or the removal of the sediment prior to discharging water out of the City. Councilmember Trude asked if the capital improvement projects are justified. Trude stated that ditch cleaning has not been going on as there has not been enough staff. Mike Ulrich stated that in the last six years there has been no ditch cleaning. The Arden Avenue ditch has two feet of sediment in it. Trude stated that another issue that came up during talks with residents was that the residents in Silver View Park felt that they would not have any expenses relating to this Plan because their yards drain into the pond. Trude stated some of the drainage into the pond could cause a problem for the City as sediment from Silver View Pond will need to be cleaned out. Mike Ulrich stated there had been five or six sink holes due to faulty pipes or breaks and cracks in pipes because the ground level has been so dry. in 1992 streets were swept 300 hours. The streets need to be swept more than that. Only 60 hours of storm sewer work has been done. More cleaning needs to be done on the storm sewers. Councilmember Trude stated that some of these items were recommended in 1978 and there are justifiable and reasonable projects in the Plan. The other issue is the financing of the Plan and where do the funds come from. Maja Werner said that one of the high priority projects in the Plan was on Sherwood Road. Ms. Werner has lived on Sherwood Road for 38 years and asked what has to be done. Ms. Werner stated that no one on the road has ever had a water problem. Rocky Keene stated that Arden Avenue has been the study area of the city since the 19701s. A study was done by the citizens that looked Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Page Fifteen September 13, 1993 ponding eater. If the City wants to size the storm sewer and street improvements to the recommended standards of today, a storm sewer system would have to be put in Sherwood Road. Ms. Werner stated that she knows there are problems on Knollwood Drive because that area is swampy. Rocky Keene stated that the water from Sherwood is adding to the problem on Ardan Avenue. The Sherwood system must be made an independent system which would help Ardan Avenue residents. Councilmember Blanchard asked Rocky Keene to differentiate between the soils of residential and commercial areas. Mr. Keene explained that the community of Mounds View is based on two different soil types -- sand and loam soil. A big portion of the sandy soil runs down Highway 10 and the business and industrial areas have less of a runoff than the loam soils. A lot of communities do not go through the exercise of weighting the runoff. Mayor Linke stated that Scenario 01 is based on those having the most runoff and Scenario #2 has the commercial and business properties as which having less runoff potential. Roger Stigney asked if rather than redoing the sewer line, has there been some consideration of tying into that line. Mr. Keene stated that the best way was to run a parallel line to Ardan Avenue and it could be tied into any street improvement project. This is a more cost effective system. Most cities tend to improve the storm sewer at the time they feel they need a street improvement. The curb and gutter type system lasts longer. Long Lake Road would go in and if oversizing has to be done, Long Lake Road would not have to be done in five or ten years. Roger Stigney asked if it were allocated for 1994 or 1995 to put that storm sewer in. Mayor Linke stated that this project is listed in the Long Term Financial Plan, but if there is a need elsewhere and not a need in this area, it will not be done at that time. Councilmember Trude stated that some cities are giving credits to those businesses who have planned for the runoff from their properties. Mr. Keene stated that the credit plan that is most successful is to have a review of individuals who wish to apply for a credit. The individual can work with City staff and come up with a recommendation to the Council as to why they should have a credit. There are many scenarios that could come up for credits. Individuals would have to come in and prove that they are not contributing to the system. Page Sixteen ?founds View City Council September 17, 13 Regular Meeting Keene stated that the utility is based on volume of runoff and, even though they may have a pond on site and reduced the rate of runoff, the same volume of water will runoff the property. Duane McCarty asked how many projects are non -compliant with the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act. A discussion followed between Mayor Linke and Mr. McCarty with regard to how the projects became listed in the Plan. Mr. Keene stated that when the process was started there are three approaches to consider when you do a plan -- meet the steps of the law, and do projects to improve the City or thirdly, do nothing. McCarty confirmed that none of the projects had to be taken on as a mandate regarding the Plan. McCarty stated that the best way to do the Plan is to do it through the process of the Home Rule Charter that gives the citizens the rights to petition for or against any project. McCarty stated he is willing to take the assessments if he wants the project. McCarty stated that if the public supports the project it will go. Roger Stigney stated that the City is rushing to hurry up and do something when there is no need to do something promptly. The Plan is in place and the City has met the requirements by just having the Plan. Mr. Keene stated that the City is beyond the date for implementation of the Plan. Roger Stigney spoke about the funding in that it is a City-wide project and it should be given to the FOCUS 2000 program for review. Mr. Stigney pointed out that the July -August newsletter only offered a small notice regarding the Surface 'dater Management Utility public hearings. Mr. Stigney felt that more communication could ha•ie been added to this newsletter and it would have solicited more public input. Mr. Stigney stated that the Council should push off the utility until one of the Task Forces could look at it with regards to options for funding. Mayor Linke stated that special assessments and looking at the maintaining of the wetlands and sediment ponds is a benefit to the entire city. Special assessments do not benefit the entire city. Mr. Stigney stated that he paid for special assessments already and he wants a credit for paying for the storm sewer down his road for the last 14 years. Mayor Linke explained the credit process regarding the surface water utility. Mounds View C,*ty Council Regular Meeting Page Seventeen September 13, 1993 A discussion followed by Council and staff regarding the storm sewer system and the need for bigger storm drains. Mayor Linke stated that this Plan has been in the works for over five years. Mr. Stigney stated that the Task Force should look this Plan over and solicit information from the citizens. Stigney stated that if the storm sewer is so important cut back on the City Hall expansion. Naja Werner stated that when the storm sewer went in there was a frontage fee and an area assessment. Those with larger lots were affected the most. Some of the assessments to residents was $25,000. This fee was for both sanitary and storm sewer. Trude stated that the Citizens Task Force report suggested that the runoff formula be used and that all she could see was a tremendous price tag for the people living in those areas. Naja Werner stated that because of all of the opposition to this Plan, the Home Rule Charter was developed. It took one year to write the Charter and the main purpose for the Charter was that the citizens of Mounds View could have input. There had been other instances where the people were against issues and the Council approved the issues the residents did not want. Ms. Werner brought up the issue of the Anoka County Airport. Werner stated, that in her opinion, the reason for the Charter is so the residents can vote on these issues. McCarty stated that many of the recommendations of the Citizens Task Force could be used today. McCarty stated that this City not retrack hard work and hard fought for rights for the citizens and the utility fee does this. The utility fee will circumvent the assessment procedures and petition rights given to the citizens under the Charter. The Charter provides referendum options to come back and appeal this issue. McCarty stated that the Council should get the community involved in this funding process. Ruth White stated that the Mayor has betrayed the people who had elected him. White stated that Mayor Linke had stated that he was against this utility. White stated that, in her opinion, he has lost his credibility because he was elected by the residents because he was against the utility. White states that the residents support the church and the schools and the residents will be stuck twice. Mayor Linke stated that the utility fee is the best way in the long run because it is controlled 100 percent by the City. Linke stated to raise the same amount of money the taxes would have went up without raising any additional money. Mounds View City Council Page Eighteen Regular Meeting September 13, )3 Councilmember Trude is opposed to the utility and wants to keep the funding on the property tax. Trude stated she has a problem with :raking churches and schools pay. Trude stated if the projects are dispersed throughout the City equally, then it is up to the people to decide how it should be funded. Trude is opposed to the churches and schools reducing her rates. If the cost is to benefit the whole city it should go on the property taxes. Trude stated there is a great deal of antagonism towards the proposed new utility fee. Trude stated if the projects are important and critical, then the items should be put into the budget now as part of the upkeep of our streets. McCarty asked if the City were to go with the surface water utility charge how does the City propose to show benefit to the people. Jim Thomson, City Attorney, stated that the theory behind the surface water management utility is that the City doesn't have to show benefit. McCarty stated that is what is wrong with it, you tax people without showing benefit. Jim Thomson stated that there is a general benefit to the City for implementing the utility. Mayor Linke stated that the utility is a benefit to the City as a whole. Trude stated that it would be a 6 percent increase from last year's amount of tax to fund all of these projects. Trude suggested perhaps these projects should funded from a combination of sources. Ruth White asked how the whole city would benefit from the Ardan Avenue project which seems to be a conflict of interest with one of our Councilmembers. Mayor Linke stated that the Council is looking at the benefit to the community as a whole rather than a portion of it. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to Adopt Ordinance No. 529, Scenario 2, Establishing a Surface Water Utility and Amending Mounds View Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 73 Trude noticed on that scenario the churches pay a stiffer fee. Trude questioned if the businessmen have had an opportunity to express their viewpoints. Mayor Linke does not support Scenario #2, because he feels Scenario #1 is treats all properties as though all soils are the same. Mounds View City council Regular Meeting ?age Nineteen September 13, 1993 MCTTON/SECOND: Linke/Quick to move a substitute motion with Scenario ¢1 rather than Scenario .#2 Trude asked how the rates would be set. Orduno stated that this would be done by resolution. ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor Linke - yes Councilmember Blanchard - No Councilmember Quick - Yes Councilmember Trude - No Councilmember Wuori - Yes Motion Carried 1 ayes 2 nays B. Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator, stated that the next step is to approve the floor plans as discussed at the September 7 Work Session. Milt Powell, Boonestroo and Associates presented the final floor plans and the specifications for the project. Cruikshank stated that approval of this information would mean authorization for Bonestroo and Associates to advertise for bids from general construction contractors to begin the construction phase of the project. Cruikshank stated that it is anticipated that the bids could be received by October 8 and brought to the Council at the October 11 Regular Meeting. Cruikshank further stated Lhat if the bid were to be awarded at the October 11 meeting, construction could begin October 18. A discussion among staff and Council occurred with regard to inputs from each department regarding the expansion. Orduno stated that it is a very cost effective plan. Linke stated that there are more meeting rooms now. Orduno stated that she no longer has to move from her office because of lack of space for meetings. Orduno explained that the Council Chambers is used a lot and that people no longer have to meet in the lunch room or kitchen downstairs. Mayor Linke spoke to Tim Cruikshank about getting speakers in the back of the Chambers. Don Brager, Finance Director -Treasurer, stated that there had been a proposal to update the video equipment in the Council Chambers. The City is looking at having a document camera and from the document camera the image would go to the cable audience and to the monitors in the room. Part of the proposal was to put a public address system into the Councilroom and out into the foyer. This is an item which is a combination of budget from the 1993 budget and a grant from the cable commission. This may become a reality yet this year for the Councilroom. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Page Twenty September 13, ' 13 MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Wuori to Approve the Contract Documents for Proposed City Hall Expansion and to Authorize the Bidding Process VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried C. Don Brager, Finance Director -Treasurer, reported that Resolution 4418 certifies to Ramsey County the City's Property Tax Levy and sets the City's public hearing on the 1994 Budget for Wednesday, December 8, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. Don Brager gave a presentation on process for the 1994 Budget. Don Brager fielded questions from the Council regarding the State aids and decrease in values from commercial/industrial properties. Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, stated that looking at 30.9 percent increase in taxes is totally absurd. Mayor Linke stated that the numbers that go to the residents from the County in November are bogus as the City's budget process is not complete at that time. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to Adopt Resolution No. 4418 Certifying the 1994 Proposed Property Tax Levies and Setting the Date for a Public Hearing on the Same Pursuant to Truth in Taxation Legislation Bill Frits asked what would happen if the City would not adopt the resolution. Orduno stated that the City would loose part of its December's state aid. Orduno stated that Mr. Frits is not the first person to ask that question. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Linke adjourned the September 13, 1993 Council Meeting to an Executive Session of the City Council at 11:10 p.m. The Council will return following the Executive Session. Mayor Linke reconvened the September 13, 1993 Council Meeting at 11:24 p.m. Mayor Linke reported that in Executive Session the Council discussed with the Administrator and Attorney a possible settlement against the City of Mounds View. Staff was directed to pursue the settlement and also to find the funding in an amount not to exceed $5,000. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting REPORTS 1. Report of Councilmembers: Councilmember Blanchard - No report. Councilmember Wuori - No report. Councilmember Ouick - No report. Page Twenty-one September 13, 1993 Councilmember Trude- Thanked City Staff for the warm welcome and extra time spent answering questions. Trude encouraged all residents to bring any questions to the Council or staff as they were very helpful. 2. Report of Mayor: Mavor Linke : a. In the packet there was a note about a possible joint meeting with the spring Lake Park Council to discuss two items. These items are the signal light at Highway 10 and Pleasantview and a possible development behind the lots on Pleasantview Also, the possible renaming of Lakeside Park will be addressed. Mayor Linke added an item to that agenda which was the Fire Training Facility. This meeting will take place at 5:30 p.m. at Spring Lake Park City Hall. Bill Frits asked if something is being done with the well house on Wood Lake. Orduno stated the City will check into this. Frits stated this is a well put in jointly by the old town of Mounds View and Spring Lake Park. Frits stated it was Ramsey County. b. Last week Mayor Linke was on vacation. Went to Branson and felt really refreshed. 3. Report of administrator a. Orduno will inform Council of funeral arrangements and can discuss the closing of City Hall. This has been very difficult for staff and strongly urged the Council to close City Hall on the day of the funeral. Mayor Linke had concerns about those who could not attend because they don't feel up to attending the funeral. Orduno explained Dick was not just a coworker but was a friend to many of the people. Some staff will not be emotionally able to return to work. Hounds View City Council Regular Meeting 4. Resort of Staff. appointed. Page Twenty -Two September 13, 13 Paul Harrington reported that on Wednesday evening, Peg Mountin will be attending her last Planning Commission meeting. Ms. Mountin has resigned her position. The Planning Commission will come forward with a recommendation for Chair to the City Council at the first meeting in October. The Vice Chair, Jerry Peterson, will take Ms. Mountin's place until a new Chair is Tim Cruikshank reported that the first of the FOCUS 2000 meetings will begin on Wednesday with a Chair and Co -Chair Meetings beginning at 5:30 and the remainder of the groups beginning at 7:00. 5. Report of Attorney: Jim Thomson reported on two cases -- one regarding regulation of nude dancing in liquor establishments (Coates case) and the other an open meeting law case. The situation was that three members of a Council were attending a Planning Commission meeting and went next door to further discuss an issue. This was in violation of the Open Meeting Law. Jim Thomson stated that the next step in the case is the attorney's fees. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before this Council, Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 11:35 p.m. Respectfully su itted, M/ --r(.C+�1.i/ G(1i4 C �YLi Michele Severson Recording Secretary nV REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE September 13, 1993 Item Description: Agenda Section: .7. A Report Number: 93-621 C Report Date: 9=S _93 Council Action: ❑ Special Order or Business ❑ Public Hearings P Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Consideration of a Budget Transfer for Purchase of Recycling Bins Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach SUAIMARY: necessary.) In order to replenish the City's stock of recycling bins, staff is requesting that an inter -fund transfer be made from the recycling printing and postage budgets into the recycling capital fund. The bins will be identical to those purchased with grant funds in 1990. The bins were not included in the 1993 budget and authorization for this purchase will require the approval of the attached resolution. Carla Asleson Recycling Coordinator Approve Resolution No. 4417, authorizing an inter -fund transfer and budget amendment for the purchase of recycling bins. I RESOLUTION NO. 4417 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING INTER -FUND BUDGET TRANSFERS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mounds View supports a strong curbside recycling program; and WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View has, in the past, provided recycling bins to residents to encourage recycling; and WHEREAS, the City has unexpectedly run out of its supply of recycling bins; and WHEREAS, the purchase of additional recycling bins are not a budgeted item in the 1993 recycling budget; and WHEREAS, to provide funds for the purchase of thSe bins, it is necessary to amend the budget, providing e udget transfers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the following budget amendments and inter -fund budget transfers: • $2,000.00 transferred from account 290-4121-393 to account 290-4121-703; and $500.00 transferred from account 290-4121-330 to account 290-4121-703. Adopted this 13th day of September, 1993. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator ?'SCLu —CN NO, 4416 CT'_^! OF ICUNDS 7IEIY CNN= CF MISCz�7 07.05' OF 1dIP ESCTA .L°D90P NG XST AND COACT CUM 9GAZNST CIT'_' FONDS N1=— the C 7 Co=c_i of Hounds 7_ew, ?u:susu. :a Mi=escta Statutes 412.2-11, has full aw;hOri. 7 over the fiaanci.al affairs of the C•"7 and; 1� _ S, The C_:7 Count°? has red-eaed the c'_a�ms nudbe=s: 39504 through 39615 in the amount of S 75,280.02 38615 -sough 38648 i=t e amours of S 206,534.64 in the amount of S th oughinthe amcm, of -0m JIOUIiT CF C=Ivs ?evS?NT:D $ 281,814.66 =sd has :'-.=d s2'_a cl f-s to be just and co^eot; of any esce?t'_cn) NC'.! _"=ov:Cpo ;e resolvedt*�t -he c_`? c^u^.c__ of ;kids vicew ne_eby a=roved the attached':_sts of cl= '*e dated09/14/93 by the vcte ayes naves ?Aaycr Clers-Acm'-J-s-, ato_^ lC-'=CNT2 F.7.A .- RF_9I3Tc. :"n^E� 1�1. L- tMrl t]L'=� 'INER DATE AMOUNTIL 1- - ji_ CI•i F_ •� .:-its/,_ •1'ri1�"'- 4:1.00 :•.=': ..'?ir CESC-!4^.PtF:E~FEE .SNOCS, AL JUIa -F - - - . - AMT- ;4_7 Ku':-- --- 'IENDCR TCT?L .i:i,!):. r ''E-IDCF. TOTAL �il.Oq - .. - 7 - Zi7AL 71TIT I•I!,I':._. - -`'�'--�---...._.- :In^ _i1.:- DEEi:1Fr'tr1T3 -_7=1:•:I ^PIT.- DES_-cr_clJh!UVENDOR TCIAL Ttj Ai9'.-- .•ErILCF • :7�,L V.lili -- -- +'EiI"'GR Tr:: rAL -:I f,- AMT- L!i.':") DESC-REF ND . :._ •. :.:. - _. .., --'::p �-CCCIJMTS F'APAKE CHECi• 7EuIST=F L,;•' - :«.Tc il`ibCil� NI1EF. _ATE -MO!jrC, VENDOR TOTAL :`.;) DEEC'F:EF•.JN11 vENee=: TOTAL r r , =?iG5 FETE=:SEDI• JOHM _.517 ny/i:}; _ q:%;1J/P 50.00 ACLOUh MUMGE�- - -1-._5i!i:-: :'1 - AMl' :O.GO OESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 37AUF=A.CE=• LEE ,:--•t:: ='EFUNQ �t.z CTAL •vl')- WHEELER, RACHEL :-51" V9l14i:r; 09/14i%'i 50.00 . ACCCUNT MUMEER— :`=-_7GG-_=_. !% AMT- O.uV DF_SC-REF_iND VENDOR TOTAL 50,00 NOELTCE.ACCOUNT :_=:R! 3 5�4 'j._:; i1,•-_ i)g/1-;•:_ .OG - ''):i I'' =c^_ -.5. i:- :F,i': '4 AMT- = .G0 DESC-REFJPID VENDOR TOTAL `.GG rUE^RL-R. Lcn1E=. 09i14/:,: 44.00 VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 25.00 C__IJn;T rJL•EE^._ :_.;-.:. _ -` ,Mi- - E°C-4E=UN0 .SIM? TOTAL , YNI,i^=t • I! _.. . • --. . _ : ! _ �I'1 � .:.... uc��-rtr u(Vu•• _ . _CIJI c':DOF TOTAL 37.00 - - - - -... lr'-I- �. - '/E;400F, TOTALio ,.. _ . •'�!'�_- -`•'.-J:-_.-._v: .:.i!i' 1f-'_.r!� DE3C-JI.7r'E'r.E -__ VENDOR TOTAL 1.. 5r) ' - `• ' ' " VENDOR TOTAL .--:C_'_UPIT ".:j9?- DECK —REFUND MI.i•L'�_,,_ — ;ci. _y.-�.-. _,.�`iil ..... VENDOR TOTAL /•.i.00 RE — — — VENDOR TOTAL AL 50.'.a0 --• VENDOR TOTAL =+?,00 IRE F¢= TOTAL 0.00 _ ._..._ _ 114.2 L1J0 CPLG SET. -F; _. - .. ` ... :Il.- .. ... CESC FE'YCLE TIRES . 1 ;CC�UNTS i'A�A6LS L�-IE_,. PEGI3Tc^ ... '. • ::- Cfie_{. :fI'!Ci4E LaVOICc C;1_i:' .I_-;: i1 - r111r'=�- _ ^� .PII •':1'i �� nIM4i:• ilri_ rV CUNT 7E02CR TOTAL - L !ENCIOF' TOTAL 3q �I_..__ .•- �VENDOF. TOTAL 45.75 =li17 _ :� = nr. cc; li ICE �:nLL'I_. 50.12 t...:.L�• L: __ - 1:i -- .: .' I-I� AM, _ DESC-GUARD IL^-criERBEARING -•L:, �'I_(.- wUi .:'C-y_�'.- _'.`I;ai <+rt't- _ _. -iEC -31i;: OF SKILILOADEn UP OF SKIDLOACIER OF - _ 1 ;lc,•L_ _ i_'i.i'!_ 312.00AL :b7.2F' -... .I yr, - ? _ ..1'.:-L�;'11. a:• :�i, F_.1 DESC-i"ONTHL! SERVICE. (S/1 _ C-. �LCOL:I'G flla`Ibc±' 741;-?>__ __Iji :fnj •Ai'Ii- ..7 L°3 i_ I"li-lIL 'la AIRTIME VENDOR TOTAL 134.5? i-L UDII III'nEE,- _ii-':_.-__:i'r' .. Ar'�- _ ... •1` _L., °AR'"O FOF. t.FO',_LANC- YILI_J "UNT NIJMEE=l -., .L .'-01"04 AMT- -L.. CE3C-rOUSr T.nh'-SI�lER ;Ir •- _ ANT- •5.__ LE'EC-COED FOR SUMP PUMP 1 •.;..:,c4:•. /14/':r:- 01JJ9 0d/i')/:'3 4.35 ,:rCnIJPIT nll!r'EEF:- SVIi-:4.:.5q-Ill"000 -`MT- 4.35 DESC-FVD FIFE ', COUFLING c,54.? i➢:ri 1'1 /': _ i!l1:5- 3/". 1.27 c_ 4 9,`• ,:I pi it ANT L._- DE'=C-} E'( :=r:000fIT PIIJi•IEE., ijl'- _ .-1 J. 1 L4/•::_: I)L1'_6 CJP/i�2i'3 1...:„r DEEL-FLIEE - _• c/y. i•:/1.j;' Ill �,,) IJ:j/Lr./•i,l _.3. 7IUMcE�'- i<.- _:�:-L^C••ia il� AMi- _.33 OESC-5'r'AFK FiIIIJ .-II M:S L't'-3"_V-LSQVI:iI AMT- _.� DESC-.".GF:AF'ER E=- _ - -,., - _ ^E:2C-lltyiilTc`IF-tip-� .. VENDOR TOTAL 08/20 FL _,:UPIT it i �_.- :'�:- 1!_ `'1 __•'- - ii. -1 !, 14 ;iqj �rl _ _;.:_ DEEC-PIETER �E-'JI;E u --�.- --'. _. 'VENDOR TOTAL '- I 44 DE SC C-,.-c1aC' -'-� �CCCI:r1T AI".T- DEEC-TcS'' IPIE MU- -..---.-1--iC0 _..._- ,VEAlDOR T CTAL EEC EC»ad CAr' •EPIDGF. TOTAL is.:�•9 ' DE T D. CHECKING GUIDE ,i:CLUN MU EEnII: '.; E; ILCF ...-.AL 1171•"` . -':.�. 77.43 Einil ESA "UD1C SUAL. INC, AP?- 77.45 :,EEC -VIDEO TAFE ,LCCIjNT MUMEEF VENDOR TOTAL r.r; EFc'-'c-itiE_ :-'•i IDF : 7,� i 1'..' i - -- ' ,i1'„i .,^t''_'.. CESC-TIM8ER5 FROM F'ARStS COI�I'I I HLMEEF - i'il 1 - . _ . . _ ' j TOTAL 'JFi1CCl; 1 !i�. _ a,;l ==..;1h'r.!_•_ _ -,i. -'�i Mt"-- " DESC-MISC GROCERIES ;Erl'cr. TOTAL 'JE,IL LIII TOTAL ---• 1: I 3. IF • .:!"_f.Ul I I�_ "GEi• - ...1. _.I : _ . - i s' .. t n? nAl' 1 * :''' DESC-TOIL-IT 7 I -SUE - -- _` :"f. ;IMS:R _rvTC AMOUNT •u:F'c� _� _iC8 .� • IE IDLR TOTAL -1_' „1_� iJil1 1p_ -_ ;'.'�. .. �•. ---' _y_'On TOTAL Io6o. 03 i)•S•i4i' ..."'l. .:, •. ACCOI:?+T q;MPEP;- _ 1: _r. iOTAL fgC•7• EANCj° : ALiG L' -I '•i Mu'li-Ep- VENDCR TOTAL 4.8Sz. ---- •'�T --- --•;` DESC-SE41ER SILL 117 ,; _ __ ,- -' -:_.;__:-.>:,,..: Ar11_ -5 DESC-SEWER RILL _C,;:.1_e„ t•L'�•!ce'-:_ -_1?-='_.- ).{:',r, AM T- `°•_'5 rya �� WER FILL Jc_C-•3E -- AMT- -_•-- =•ESC-_EWER BILL n- -=SC-SEWER BILL ptr_ CSC -SEWER BILL _ -- - M; LEc`=-SEWED BILL - EWE^ r-''+L_ -:r•=C-SEyIEF: _1-,_:_I.;-.`:�_..di=i- -------..1.,.,. nMT - --'-_ 9II_L -- ACC=1_.1'r m-riEE - ._. ;:ESC-SEWER BILL -- .. TOTAL _ 11,713 ESC-ARM KIT 1• t DE L . F:M KIT :< ROE' --•- -_ DESC-CYLINDER ACCOUNT NUME" - -- - •:,,3 E.7' GEE'-C.;SDIT MISHANDLED: A CC C"1T NUMLLR- licit--: •_.__. VENDOR TOTAL 1 ^:.71 ;,L COF:F'DRAT -ri1 ir% 4 • - 1_:il_i' _ 0'?/ld%`�c; IT PA'/?1EiIT _-.• AMT„ :0.i` DE5C-INSTALLMEi -'--- VENDOR TOTAL =.'4 DE5C-RAG3 & TOWELS DES-C-UNIFORM RENTAL ,,:, DE5C-UNIFORM REM'!''1- PA'ABLE LHEEK PE•OISTE? AMOUNT CEIC-01KFORM RENTAL ;Iw,:;Url'i •:I_'''_E- - DEIC.unIFORM RENTAL QCQN7 Li^2E. - - - - _. _ ... Ta__ :";FCRN RENTAL --jq .Iund=`- _. --- - 0� , `- _ •, 5EEC-UNIFORM FENTAL -'--- r...r .:= -_. -... CF.W-UNIFORM FUTAL '-• PENTAL . - - - J a ENTAL r., 1703 S;,ai.T- - r�E _r•.I D M„TEF =LS Fr yN °, ._. .. -._.. :. ---- - ' DESC-mNSULTANT^a TI E .. - - _ -UZ -:.... :1.. I.:I_I I i iJL:i10ES - - = UESC-WINDSHIELD - 440: - -- 00126/90 _ _ . . DES%-wINDSHIELD 5STAY; 15 DESC-WINDSHIELD _'r. - .rCCOL'NTS PA;Ai•LS _. __ EO:.,_" . F.![,I�r+; IE:iL� 'iru" il:i'1'E^. •_:iy._ .i'i'. _. .,..0 .`II'tCr [.1. a rv'L;_II- 17,51I VFiiDEFt 'OTAL It - - - - It. Ar! i - =c ::__ E:L iH LA1 E COUrITF:: „F`(E•, 5'. j.:, IJ9/ 1 4i'a_: "c l IACCOUN' ?nJrIC+En- 1 S'.'1::- :::i-3 :Egli[ AMr- SU.(iQ UE L"-fh: 51/DiSMKTS ACT Si i VENDOR TOTAL =•'� • �� •545 L f F-BAN dIEa1.JF't _-1 - ..t. - '.I:J_}/.Iv 'o-4•�5 L:. ILL E SUS_ - 'JG•(C'U(-, TOTAL 64.25 r' - 1C.On. OE°r ,JrF IiOP REG.- SAA'?i' vE l'_IOh OTAL 12.00 ISTF:IcUTIt'iG CO "1- - ACCOUN7 rIUE=. 1'?I --- !__G01. AMT- :. C'E'-.•C-c.PkAiKE Cil L rt_ 21 . -•5 rCCCulI.' NUMBER- _..-..v1111;AMT- OESC-MISC PART JE`JDOF Tr_IrL _:,.51 _:=CJ �.Ati. :'D: ['+'-' :�/:"v I'1p_.:. CCO_!hJT hIL'I•IEEF- LiJr- __-;i-!_1iC0 altT- 1:?.:a' GESC-HTR PIG - -! VENDOR TOTAL I:3. c„ -..r:•1 il•:,/11, 40/ iiG (t1/':'',� 734.21) '107`.•0 rIASI'S CORPORATION- c _�!-- _ _-.-. �EBC-^+r.Ir1TEr:r-N�c _ SOPT'd1=i AC: :ILir:ct'r: C4._4 VENDOR Tf,'T.,L . AC --CUNT llLI*SF_ iG_ ;1:;_1.;:'i:i;i. _r _ _, n DESC-HEAT OUN Dii•^. CUT ENDGR TOTAL =•=1a (1 '17i 1 METRO hlASTE CONTROL AC"CUNT NIJ!EE= -: -. ':'":1' 4._7_-.0G DESC-CCTGEER SEWER SERVIC' VENDOR TOTAL 4,527•01? i•1344 NI 161EST ASFHFLT :GP^<., _: i,..:, r;4; •: 1rJ ': ., rr.::,'17/93 1 .,_, ACCOUNT hU WEER- - _ - ..'' (' yf! i S . _ _ DESC-DLOr1F' CHARUE ACCCUNT NUt^.BE- DEGC-MATERIALS r DUMP CHG. VENZCF TOTAL _?.64 p1IDWEST 5FEO: -I_i r =;_L : : r , : _;Lyq J'!3,4'�.__ h 'ACCOUNT MUNEL=. P:°' 4-•-_ DEaC-SEr'IL,EEARLIO 551 C.4:U: .. _:. .-'r'!•1, -. J01'JS 4: 'CcZ+_rr.: = -.ASLc _' EKlf. REGI TE. ;E:$•CF VICiC:E-_ INVC.IL'= NC '•'E ILGF. `i•—:'= r•II_i^=.I_:F� _�A't'= I NVO iCE ',MEF; —DATE AMOUNT AC CUrIT dlLr!cS^- P '_.-.•.4,)!iI) AI•JT- :7. 10 CIESC-TIRE ;END -OR TOTAL P-._� �•t:'• :1lidt•IcnCT,-.'I,:at,l .. _•_. !'r :1.. _ _ _ ._,-.. :4.� AJ1 r- ;_•?..= C'ES'=-ci4:E-_XTLNGUISHEF. SN VE?JDCh T_T:;L 15 7 0' /14/' 09,•4/9' :' S.V4 Aim T- _._.:4, Dr_so- rr2L':. CENT:-ICATION :EN1lCF TOTAL _ 5. X, 17-1 .-;;ii— •-.__-'El:-_UGI_°T ❑=AV:CE VENDOF TOTAL 47.: 5 he:;�liU NORTH L_%_iJUTCi•I It DO _"_: 0`, 14i'i _ 357 :): i='0/r: 4.53 ,C!:CU[•li IIL'I:eE=- :! .-a_c . AMT- 4.5- C'E_,:-` YDS TURF MATERIAL VE'i.,CF' i'GTAL ...��� :__ :1 IVCnIn _LiF• ._-F _,!C .:.il 0"1114•^F. 3AV_3C: �C� L'NT DILit.: -- ,-_• ---:a:- Ahl'- _...:- cSC-RCUNC-UF -.5 vALLCNS 'lE`fCF. TOTAL 2'93. 4 =.CCCL'PIT iVL"CE' -_. !-_ C•:!0 ANT- 1'._ DETC-SrRAYEF. :It EOTTLE •iE`t^GF TOTAL .E: _ - =5 -' IJJEF _ ?�.:,_ 'J? ' 14,%'S `.i:: ' 14; "P3 4019. 3140.3- DE3C-_d0! HW'r 11j - WELL 4 70*t±--'1__ --!'JVp AMT- c_.=? DE'a-C-iE-5 GF;OVELAND fiC' .1MT- ff .-'-- nE?r__!"C=7rh12CT1 CF - :: ANT- :C.41 DE3C-UiP•p_-rcT:; AVE - FEAC. AMT- DESC-'=4n FLEASANTVIEW CIF. 00/14/;,., 4;'+_ 145.33 ?L:: DE_E-'_ '_:`. I A V S — =IF rc All E F:L LAKE ._.. _ !E3 C -=_:1 �DNG LAKE RGA0 LrkE FC-AD HT 'u.;. _... .--•-. --::n(p) 'i:!T- _-.._ DESC-54T2 ADAMS ST EmDCF: 70TAL 41,15.:.2 :rFT:-ERN .T:ATcc ='I:•I 14/-1 37__.6- rll_�_LI11 III_: _ ♦._. .'J'J'�I: II'IIJ N-.... NOFTHERN dELD i:IO 50r 5.. '?•�'; 1-. _ 'i r:.1 !::_ ]�i,'-_ 114. j4 ACCOUNT t111Ml EI- "i ,.SI::-. _•iI C1) AMT- 1:4. a) DESC-I AIN71:I i;CE 1: REPAIF. ACZOUNTS PAYABLE C'mEC"t-iEGI5TE. MOLNU: 'llEi� i,rdglL'E INt•OICE ,E:' IM1ltiOICE NML-R GATE AMOUNT VENDOR TCTAL 114.00 VENDOR TOTAL 1? . BUJ ?c0- _4/13! _ _ _.-,•-, rl ii= %•�:1 59.47 •CCGLNT'NUMBE-n- 100-1:._--'_�2 AMT- 5:1.>DEEC-11 I- ASS" a BRAKE SH _c.lfi. a'h_. r:,, 01: c":• 57.,J_ AL--:CLMT MCErrr �r^T- ; =,.'14 DEEC-TRUCi. BHCCY2 VENDOR TOTAL 117.11 .. ..,C��UPI' t:L't•�er ...-�':- !-.C! aM:- '=5.%,q DEZC-200 FLYERS VENDOR TOTAL 35.04 _;ic.,-r..j _i..,: 1-i ;i:_ 'i�31 2 ':$/27j',r _i 250.00 _.. - .?':-1_-.;___.r)i:!; �t•r"- .__.... ='E _C-CUT ii NO - VENDOR TOTAL �SJ,•;r, 107.7: DEcC-TIFC•S . 09r'1.1, 000;'c_1 .?/_'/ i _ 55.70- -- �ILr.-- -',r''-12-- ----... :_t••-- `__.-. DES_-r-0`1'T !_E3=F'EOIT VENDOR TOTAL 52.03 .-. raUL [LOP:. .. 7TAT I'. .-'?/-.';rl !1'=''/1 - 1.T r:. �`_ i:?/i'ir /':: 5.73 =I_i:T i!L•i!GEri _:•DG��=-CL'i15TE.UCTlON PAPER VE>1CGF: TOTAL 5. 7iS.00 t. .. =�UirT HUMS En 1•:'.-1__. --- ;! _AMT-,-..,..Q. CE '^ EFFECTI'JE MOitT FROOn. VENDOR TOTAL 715.00 - : i14:_1 ,1:3/25/'?0 :P.77 r . :.r, r - 'P.--T DESC-PHOTOS AC.,- --I-; r' ML _Er! c t _ DESC-FILM 02, nL��LI'i` Nil _.-_ -: _ __. __. .... it „P''- LESC-!•iIJ j10 Cr EETTE ACCDI-3IT "70 DESC-AUDIO CASSETTE ACCOUNT i!! ! 4-=t0! - :'i- 21 . C•ESC-FILM 14/ ACCOUNT i•!l!!^.G-F_ 1'.`?._•:1••,.;._:1.:,�I.-rP'T-•,, V. .4 C'EOC-SCFHF'2121-3I. ACCOUNT !'uJ;'`c?:- 1 jr;r-.J!: r;-:.:,,;.�., :•t11'- _-.-. DE=C' FILM VENDOR TOTAL !1c.13 S22!ii EFP-,'NG !_r-PE .;`RP REl. - ,'.t, - rt: ,"20/'._ 210.316 '- :Eu'_STE. i:Iva,C,3 INVOICE t DATE AMOUNT DE9C-6FjPRFD WATER CARNIVAL Ali.-... 'vENDCF TOTAL =1�. 24 1 DESC-POI:C'r. S�WPI Cc_IAR c 1 CE L rLLC SAWN C R I _=L'NT '.I:ieG: _ -- .. _�: , !L;t's; :TRIPS - OIL ELV 46. L'E LGICRETE MIX -- C'ELC- CL'_H 214"1 CEDER DESL-- ILI.-ONE CAULK -OIL . -CCDUN ru.'^St= L-= : 47.25' 7.1)7/CL./r [c L COFING,SHINGLEZ '-L'- .' DL L •� I_lJ 'a1i J.rl hC F _� , IDOR TOTAL c _ CUTTER, . '-: WPC. 50 . L._`I_ _ - - -,.'r- - -•--vENDOR TOTAL ..ViEZU�.:'.1_-. 32- =•i_:LIJI'I•. .11-I•I=_. - ..- .-'.-...-'. _ v.'i. l- _'C.=C-?:'4 -'d�•�1 _C_l?•I- crJ'^E _--40 90011Z=' -.,Ec_ -74 =•�C3_1'1T >dJf1*E=- =CCL;'i?' :EF:7OR TOTAL : DES :_� =r. •- -.. - AMT - 174. 356 12 OESC-MISC FAFTS ,=z:U! 4— GULSS 1, l'-4 'MT- 4. ",EE-C-PETURN VENE.OR TOTAL wASTE ilwiAGEMENT 4 �e!,-• - 1 a 1 U 117 - --I- -,-M - M CQLLECT-O&' - IC ij,:, jazu-mm.- C COLLECTION - 21 J` p4t., T 4m,. VENDOR TOTAL 785.75 3-P6 14 oe/24/�la* 460 .:34 W, TURSO QEM MUGR DEE -211T V E P IDU F% TOTAL 460--.4 --;E-2TRURNC =C-SUMP' BASIN ACC.DiNT Piljll_�Er-- AM 2-L ZIE- 3-1.S4 1 VEK-Op TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 75 2SO - 0 1 -•L. iil_�n..._. ..1�. -:/l i_ _ "(�:1 i.11: !r_r. L'I 1_ Jf �.0 •:1 �•=•.� _...�Jlul 1,EcC-cft0�3 ]'; i<,; •` : _ .:_''•..=: _-1 --_. �'1•� I.1:1 �.in - 11 _•mil' 11_E .71 1: `iUt',.._•-- art-- _.:`.1.`,0 CIESC-="rC.52 -..-1-...-.=1'C.. 117 _.-C J%i Ta=i^CUrii AMT- _..__ DESC--=.`I,.. JI`c ._' .. AMT- L'csc- sIIJh1S : - --- `,t'!T- .. CIEEC--= ISi0M5 ., 1 - ,. DEEC-=ENSIONS :. ..I '1:12c _ - ... IS''.7Q OESC-FENSIJNS 1-•7.5.; CES C-FENSInP15 Si I ,�CCJU t� I^•'_ ` _ ... .: ;L=,PIT- _ - .- I -•I^-_ I UESC-r_ NI 5 I I _ - --if _ aEsc-rErlslorl_ - - _, ,; , - GESC-PErISICNE 32 r• IQNS - .; ;;; :.LIT- _r. _ I__ 'd_P'cr .- --.-1--_ ._.: _ J _ rlr_ 1:.0[ -c•: c LESC-=_ _ AMT_ AM. LIESC-FENSI.D..NS - AMT_ LIESC-'r'Er1 [�' !S 34.3d- .l 0 APIT- ` =.70 LESC- 'E4SIL t5 '. AN - E.: VESC-F=NISICNS - '__-' .P_I•'L _.- '— ..' - I^ il __-- -..-..._-'F::. tf: -- VENDOR TOTAL ''fE= uE:C-9/='i - FICA FICA pESC /_li - FICA ;•I_rIT ^II_P!6cr i�:C '- ,)-;' .'i, r.Pl`- . _. .FLZA cIfs= . - ,_ AMT P9 [I[r] -1_/D) - FTC" r17- _ _ • [? CESC-<., n FICA CESC-i%mil FICA nPl- `c LEEC--' n - FICA -- FICA r;T idl!iiBEi+- - r,nn __ . -.. _-)..... AMT- - - oE�c-: _�� FICA - ; ; Ar[r- -57.77 C-:. _C, _-I_N7 NUMi_. - _: - .: - _:..1:, al -IT- _E _. - .ESC- /- - FICA r FICA _E FICA AMT- _• _ '`! LIE I'.. _.. i... .� ._ ..I i(npl_= �, -E :�:'. _" '•iP![-�i l•iaT_ 111QUi'IT ;Z!i - MEL:_�,_E -..._JEoi=-�=. _4 - iME=is _- JF_:;C :;MT- _. CEoC-.,-. - ;IIEGiCARE PCCOUNT NUMBE4- -1' 5- -!•v A[•17 1:. : _CSC-3/._. - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NIL;MrEF._ ... _ .:1"! ��,,_._� t:M-r- _-.___ ='EEC-:.:.. - NED!CAPE rCCCUPt* NUMcI_.- -_.'I__. .:..(1; AIM—.- -. GE -,-i! V - MED'CAFE i' a_ M �ESC-:i;`_i - MEDICARE �;C:_�:UNT NUMcE=. - _L.i-.+:_''. _ -,:; : !':'! it AMT- ESC - , .:0 - ME' iCARE -UHT ?Ii-1MBE.'• _ -, i _ . - . _ .... --MT- f . , J) - riED ii{JMBEr- _ hI,:ME'E-,' ... - �.... _: `.!;�,, . �'.'i - _ .. _ _dc--'/sir - MED:":=rE N''I'EE':- -..--._.-....-.0 nP'I- '...-: :,E .-3/a'ri - Mr_^:C."'RE ilc`_C-g,; is - ME=_CARE 'HNDCS TOTAL 3,178.54 1t? 'tl CiEIiC-FE?LND ... FCR MI:L-.E- AL' TOTAL 40 C.10 !CSC-AD.n L T:._ �::1DGF: �nE=X :HE�C;:. ii•IV:ii=_ I1T::IICy i E'1_ jF E NUML'EF. IATE :riV•:. CE ^IM?P _.-TE ANJUN' A,'17- 'I).(:Q, GEL-C -NE T1.11IFY ?: ?YSTEM CON! )ENDC•R -OTAL _O. iN! ACCZLI IT =ESC-LLINCH FOR ELECTION JI 8. .. _.. 1:- p:q<aif :Lnr_ <•,p,•it L'E:=C-^ENITAL F7R SPECIAL E: --_ - __-., __.. _ _ .. _.... .:i.•':i ��- is .'__ _ .=..;}r, AIIT- I•:_. u¢..L "IMF - ';E?1DCF. TC -.!L 7. - - _.00 :E 1,wo' -L = C ccrfF = OEEC-ANNUAL Mr1 GFOA CONF DESC-CJP!FUTER '< MONITOR ,END0P TOTAL _.". DE-TC-DELIVERY OF SEPT/OCT DESC-DELIVERY OF SEPT/OCT ,Z:;CCR TOTAL 805.00 IX3/30,193 1053.73 ;- OESC-AGENT FEE c4'.'=7 DL"SC-AGENT FEE DESC-AGENT FEE LIEEC-AGENT FEE 54 DE3G-AGENT FEE VENDOR 70TAL `:.73 !-l'=-- L_'f E F:I- JO DESC Z�sc c,c5a - . HEC!" iE Tlj%jrTrE i u 10 AMOUNT -7 DES'" 7 0.1 7 DE_ JQ Dc_ DE AMTt y EEC-PENSIONS 'NT- 7 DEEC -.ENS 1ONS ...... DESC -PENS I ON' f: M ,MT 2 21 AMT- : �Z..N_ 5 I ja 2 C -PEI.S :Ili --r ENE: __N7 lo-c, i A ANT r m. mT- DEEC-PENS:ONS AMT- .7 I�EIONS E:' DEE AC Z,j, iT- - 1-= T nhj2 7C F I C-A 11 T -FICA _ FICA ACZGLN u 1 -1 Z E,- - FICA Acl--�Ul P:;:mSEP- i ... .. .. r FICA 7 7 4 AMT DESC- FICA AMT- OE FICA AMT- DECK` FIC, CEEZ: - FICA ZE FICA r FICA -DE= FICA D E S C FICA DEC FICA 14 FICA 7 DESC FICA FICA 7 - -4. 7 r. E FICA FICA FICA FICA _ CCDUh1T', F'AYAELE ?RE ='+:D -,:E ^.E_ _. _ •^CUrtCS ')TC'I -' - )ENDCR CHECK CHECK -r- IMVG:C= :'a':CD.E APIUUNT :•IQ VEADCF. NAME NUMBER DATE Ii`i'.CIt... ?ll•15R Ci. Ti3 AcCO!'PIT IIUMgER- I':;')-11-.-•i:1i!I)0 AMT '..:.i :ESC_a/' ca•a• _ FiC, AI' I_r.IT hlU1,:ocq_ i':iJ_11•-:�_i.'..1:)t:0 AMT- :'.._. =�ESC-p•i, /"' '`Ecr-,•: - F_C� ,•n- : - .I`i!it� :=.r^.T' - _ rc:p'` - i'_:A A ;,C CUNT NLIM12EF- 1,}li-- 1 x;-0 14 C AM, _ _ . _:: ESC-%/'Ts: •: _ _ _coUrr rau cR- i •'. _ - :CC-__4:i-0:3ll)J)i, AMT- �•'�'i DEc-9/c:a,.. S , _ F:CA .;CC-;ut4T 'CC:AIPJT .'.IUMSE'r.- NUMBER- 4=.0-031'700 Al1T- Ic. :_ DESC-:%I"3/9- - FICA uNT c rlUIlEEF __--,;-I"):1:itj�i _. . AMT- -r% .=. DESC-''/,):_i"� - FICA - :_:r T NIJMGEF -d jF,i)_l1�: i i (! y '171 AMT- 42 4 DESC-9P.)`P?3 - FcCA _ 4C'=^_'_h,�T ^II:I•'EEr- .. i': `1-. AM7- .: ..ry - al.i r!2ci1- ::.:GO AMT- ..._ C'ESG-:%/03/'T - - FICA _I _�0..4.--�`1-I:, AMT- . IESC-V/1:�=/YL - F1Ln AMT_ _. JEEC-9/0.,/•:, - FICA Ar!T _. r'ESC-9/0: ;sw - FIC,; AMT-:. DESC-'i';i,r3/'•'_' - FICA _ESC-9/Iii/•?:? - FiC,4 - -. _ '.- -`.•. 'C- Iltii il, APIT- ti .'�- c /r_ %.^•, DF_..C-"•'. J='I' . - FICA •._ Slc ;IT '. __ DESC-9/0$!9_ - FICA Dr_EC-9/03,9._ ` - VENDOR TOTAL 3:14. S'2 A!•I-- :15.. _ DEL HEALTH INS. FcEA SE - dT7- - '•+.. `ESC-HEAL71-i INE AM-- _ :.-d LEEC-HEALTH INS FF:Et - cc _` _ DE3C-HEALTH iDIS Fn-M - c' DEEC-HEALTH INS FF.EN - SE �i•r-- _ ='C -ET::-HEALTH INS FNEN - SEf ZFZ -HE LT!a :NS FRE:! - EE' i:EaC-,HEALTH ZNS F'4Ei1 - _E =d1-- DESC-aEALTH INN FREM - SE r'c ANT- - 4 _.;_ DE -EC -HEALTH DIS FF.'EN - SE: "_ _ _ _ 1,r•pq -t•1T- _ _... �c C-HEALTH INS F'REI1 3E' ANT - . - - . _ I'E3C-HEALT4 1NS FREM 3E: _ - AMT- q ESC-HEALTH INE FREM - SE _ ... DESC-HEALTH INS r'^Ei1 - SE: i- AMT- t DE3C-HEALTH !NE ='REM - 3E ;E?IDCR TOTAL AM-- I4, .l:i :EEHEAL C H [i•I' r•❑c. ,. !- _ -z jESC-HEALTH INS FREM SE - PIT- -- E_C-HEALTH IN'lz F S1 - SE ... .. i _ c.;•t-; - : - . _ _ DEEC -:,EAL T H I Na ci•! _ _ _ r'T- _ ... ? - 3C-HEALT,i IBIS i=' L' 7 a -1i. 1 _ ,.J__� GI=;OCP HEALTH PLAN. .r!e ---._ r�:li_. : �7:.' �. 1P,•%;%n ._. C' _aT M1II: r`BEF:- 1. T-'R'EiM - SE �r':J_rIT �UJMEEF;_ -•�,' __-• •.;1_._C.r ,rl-•- .-.:.�=ESC-_EdI L _..:. --EN - SE .-I•!- -E.._-L _iPO _R,.M - SG rIT .IL'i•lrcn- ...-4i'-'!-!4 }(il; _ill7 -.-V DEEC-[:E:I.AL .CIE =REiM - SE --=--L�c IT-=L _:i5 :FEN - _c �:__ur;: u!r5!: '..--._. .-_;1.1: •.- :E-_"IE:IT,:.L ,NS -R:E:- - _ :i[C;;rJr1T rlUl-IE'EF- -:.-''_.-aL•)iil? nl"T- .-. _EoC- c:ITtIL INN FFEM - SE ------ AP17- LESC-L:-= INS rFr, E:! EE=- ,,.;- .:;.fir"cE=- .._-�:_. _-... �r•!-_ _:.-: _DES_-L::=E '_r18 P�t'aia - 3EI=- i':- pn_p•:.;_R_ - __•_.-. til•I`- _..: =EEL-L_"= INS FR04 - =EF: .._�... _... "1U�1_i='- il.- __.-. •_.. ,i =1•tT- 'i'-__-'L-S__--_: :HS r .C:'! - SEF 'iLM=t^. .. - _- _.._. _ -i.-- .-_ _CDC-L_: E ."j '-E.•: - EF r'!ChtGEi; = - -L" INt: : E.: - 3E." -- -'I J•JUh� iNMSER- ... -1.. --... -, -- :.=IESC-L_: _ INS =.='M - SEPT _Ui!T :glJl^._t ._--.�:. ". _ __ -tEC-CLEF _i•13 - .¢:'! - _�_: 'll_M ..._. . i-LIFE INS 'cE_.l v_E:. IE. . -LIFE INS FzEH - E_P- :ENDOR TOTAL ,.:.7i. •- ';I_, ,,.:. - :i.n_di•-..-..-. _4 _ __.-_ DESC-RECEPT ICrI-TFl!�c VENDC'F TOTAL 'S !- _•,._,:E' - -Ar:FiEE:IN r- ---.�.; I.,;/.�_,-_ p•DI(1_'.:_ 1C:.14 __.7.:!I. '_P."�P- tt":�-�__. --�:!�I!' .:M 1^•?.1•} DESi:-fiCCM CE' '-- iLC Cu: :EM:OR TOTAL :4 :.`G DL=EC-_:Fi=;'iEL 1A ilE i I U.M. Z E F. Ain 2 3011c. GUSTAFSON, LEE �864; ACCOUNT MUMEER- ,CZGl.jN7Z 7,c,E-�AID REC 1:4,010E INVOICE DA I I 'Mr-uNT I)EHOOR TOTAL 77. VENDOP. TOTAL 265.01) DEK-REFUND 'JE'1[10r%' TOTAL 50. 00 3::.'Nrj TOTAL - .4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERAITON Report Number. 93-614C ni TIES Report Date: STAFF REPORT Council Action: $ ❑ Special Order of Business September 13, 1993 CI Public Hearings CITY COUNCIL NUMTENG DATE -- t Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Award Bid to Bacon's Electric for $2,900.00 to be Transferred from Contingency Account No. I00-4500-910 to Account 10 100-4190-L21 Account ReviewiRemmmendacion: . Na tom to supplemene :his rep • Comments attached. Explanation/Sutsmar/ (attach supplement sheets u aeaaaasY.) STTM)V "L Staff received bids on the City Hall entrance lighting revision. The bids are as follows: Bacons Electric $2,900.00 Gooher Electric $2,919.00 Staff recommends award to Bacons Electric at the bid price of $2,900.00. 9 1nic eel U'--rich, Public Works Supervisor RECOMM NE DATION: Award bid to Bacons Electric for $2,900.00 to be transfered from contingenr_.i account no. 100-4500-910 to account no. 100-4190-121. ,Sscnws <auwr. 7. C BEQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number. 93-614C Report Date: 9-8-93 RTAFF R LPL''_ OR.T Council Action: ?( ❑ special order of Business Se [ember 131993 public Hearings CITY COUNCIL , MEETING DATE 1 tji Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Award Rid to Bacon's Electric for $2,900.00 to be Transferred from Contingency Account No. 100-4500-910 to Account N�100-4190-121 Administrators Review/Rammmen - No comments to supplement this . comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets u aeeeavrY.) SI?M ARY: Staff received bids on the City Hall entrance lighting revision. The bids are as follows: Bacons Electric $2,900.00 Gopher Electric $2,919.00 Staff recommends award to Bacons Electric at the bid price of $2,900.00. �Milcael Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor RECOMMENDATION Award bid to Bacons Electric for $2,900.00 to be transfered from contingency account no. 100-4500-910 to account no. 100-4190-121. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL. MEETING DATE September 13, 1993 Agenda Section: 7• F Report Yomber. 93-620C Report Date: 9-8-93 Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business Cl Public Hearings $I Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Consideration of Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement for the Fire Training Association Administrators ReviewiRecommendarion: • Vo comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplemeat sheets as S 1 ARY* The City is part of a Joint Powers Agreement with the cities of Blaine, Fridley, Spring Lake Park, Brooklyn Center and, until recently, the City of Columbia Heights, to participate in the construction and operation of a future fire training facility. The City entered into the agreement in December, 1990. The City of Columbia Heights has opted out of the Joint Powers Agreement, thereby necessitating the need to amend the Joint Powers Agreement. The attached amendment to the existing agreement deletes Columbia Heights name from the Agreement and amends the amount that the remaining cities are assigned for construction should the facility become a reality. to Orduno, 1 RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Attached Amendment to the Existing Agreement by deleting Columbia Heights Samc from the Agreement and Amend the Amount that the Remaining Cities are Assigned for Construction should the faculty become a reality. AMENDMENT OF JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRt;CTION A -ND OPERATION OF FIRE TRIINTNG SITE W`HER.EAS, the parties who are signators below had entered into an agreement titled "Joint Powers Agreement - Fire Training .association", a copy of which is attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the only expenditure of funds to date pursuant to said agreement has been by the City of Fridley; and WHEREAS. a party to the agreement, the City of Columbia Heights, has liven written notice to the other parties via letter dated .august 10. 1992 that it no longer wishes to participate in the agreement, and WHEREAS. the remaining parties desire to amend said aereement in order to continue the project of constructing and operating a ire training site. NOW. THEREFORE, the undersigned Parties agree to the following modifications of the agreement: I Deletion of Columbia Heiahts: Delete from the "Joint Powers agreement - Fire Training Association" (copy attached, and hereafter called the AGREEMENT), the City of Columbia Heights, wherever that name appears, and change the number of "member departments" from four to three wherever stated. The undersigned hereby acknowledge receipt of a termination notice from the Citv of Columbia Heights by letter dated august 10. 1992 from its attorney Gre_uory 1 Woods. and accept the termination in accordance with paragraph 16 of the AGREEMENT. There exists no claim against Columbia Heights for proportionate share of initial construction costs or operating costs. =. Initial Construction: The "initial construction costs" identined in paragraph 6 of the AGREEMENT shall be chanced to S150.000. it being understood that the parties may later increase this amount if additional contributions are approved'oy the parties' respective governing bodies. 3 Operating Budget: The statement in paragraph 7 of the AGREEN[NT citing the 1991 Operating Budget is deleted. PAGE 2OF:PAGES 4 .amendment. The AGREEMENT amendment procedure shall require unanimous approval of the parties. in lieu of majonty approval, reflecting the existence of three rather than four parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned goveming bodies approve these amendments by authority of their duly authorized governing bodies on the date of their signature below. CITY OF FRIDLEY favor City Manager Date CITY OF SPRING LAKE PARK. Mayor City .administrator Date CITY OF MOL\'DS VIEW Mayor City Administrator Date CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER: Mayor City Manager Date CITY OF Mayor Citv Manager Seot:emher 2, 1993 Date JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FIRE TRAINING ASSOCIATION THIS AGREEMENT made by and between the City of Fridley ("Fridley"), the City of Columbia Heights ("Columbia Heights"), the City of Brooklyn Center ("Brooklyn Center"), the City of Siring Lake Park ("Spring Lake Park"), the City of Blaine ("Blaine"), and the City of Mounds View ("Mounds View"), each being a Minnesota municipal corporation, which together shall form the Fire Training Association (the "Association"). WHEREAS, each party to this Agreement desires a facility to train members of its fire department; and WHEREAS, it is more economical for the parties of this Agreement to jointly and collectively construct, use, and maintain a fire training facility rather than each party constructing and maintaining its own facility; and WHEREAS, Fridley, Columbia Heights, Brooklyn Center, Spring Lake Park, Blaine, and Mounds View are authorized to enter into an Agreement for the joint and cooperative exercise of powers common to them pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 471.59 et seq.; and WHEREAS, the cities of Spring Lake Park, Blaine and Mounds View are provided fire protection services by the Spring Lake Park Fire Department, Inc., a Minnesota non-profit corporation; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned governmental units and the Association in the joint and mutual exercise of their powers agree to jointly construct and maintain a fire training facility in accordance with the following terms: 1. The Fire Training Association shall consist of four member departments. For purposes of this Agreement, Spring Lake Park, Blaine and Mounds View shall be collectively considered one Member and have one representative on the Chiefs' Board. Spring Lake Park, Blaine and Mounds View appoint the Spring Lake Park Fire Department, Inc. as their agent, which together with the cities of Fridley, Columbia Heights, and Brooklyn Center shall be known as the ("Member Departments"). 2. Term: The term of this Agreement shall be perpetual until only one Member Department remains. 3. Fire Training Facility. The training facility shall consist of a training tower and burn room and other elements of training as determined and recommended by an Operations Committee (Paragraph 14 hereof) and approved by the Chiefs' Board. 4. Facility Site. The facility shall be constructed on property owned by the City of Fridley and located at 348 - 71st Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota. The Member Departments and the City of Fridley hereby agree to execute a twenty-five (25) year lease of the property from Fridley to the Fire Training Association in consideration of the payment of $25 for the lease term. 5. Ownership. Ownership of the facility, excluding land, shall be jointly held by the Association. -2- 6. Initial Construction. Initial construction costs are 'projected to be $200,000, which shall be shared equally by the members. The initial construction costs shall not exceed $200,000.00 without prior approval of each Member Department's City Council. Each Member Department shall pay its cost allocation for the facility construction pursuant to the payment schedule unanimously approved by the Chiefs' Board. 7. Operating Agent. The operating agent shall have authority, on behalf of the Association, to pay costs authorized under the Operating Budget for the training site, and any additional expenses unanimously approved by the Chiefs' Board. An annual Operating Budget shall be forecast in the second quarter of each year for the following year's operation of the site. The 1991 Operating Budget is projected to be $6,000. The City of Fridley is appointed as the initial operating agent. The Chiefs' Board shall have the authority to name an alternate department to take on this responsibility as it deems necessary. The Chiefs' Board is specifically empowered to set a limit on the yearly operating costs. Failure of a Member Department to pay its proportional share of the yearly operating costs, or additional expenses unanimously approved by the Chiefs' Board, shall be grounds for removal of that Department upon the sole discretion of a majority vote of the Chiefs' Board. —3— 8. Agent for Construction. The Member -Departments specifically authorize the City of Fridley to act as the Agent for Construction of the facility on their behalf. The Agent for Construction is empowered to commission designs for the facility according to the specifications approved by the Chiefs' Board. Following approval by the Chiefs' Board, the Agent for Construction shall cause bids to be taken for the construction and shall present the final bids to the Chiefs' Board for ratification. Once the bids and specifications have been approved by the Chiefs' Board, the Agent for Construction shall have the power to award the contracts and bind the Member Departments to the contracts so awarded. 9. Repairs and Improvements. If recommended by the operations Committee and approved by the Chiefs' Board in advance and ratified by each of the Member Department's City Councils, all major repairs, replacements, additions/improvemencs shall be equally assessed against each Member Department. lo. Insurance. The Association shall purchase policy(ies) of insurance in forms and amounts to protect its insurable interests in the value of the site's improvements against perils of fire, theft, vandalism and Acts of God, and to protect the financial interests of the Association, parties, their agents and employees, against all claims or lawzuits, including expenses and attorney fees, —4— arising from the ownership, design, operation, and maintenance of the facility. The policy(ies') limits, terms and conditions shall be acceptable to each party. Costs of insurance shall be apportioned equally to each Member Department. 11. Facility Use. Each Member Department shall be entitled to equal use of the facility, subject to advance scheduling through the Operations Committee under the rules and guidelines established by the Chiefs' Board. 12. Use By Others. The Chiefs' Board shall establish guidelines for use of the facility by others for a fee. The Operations Committee shall carry out the guidelines and shall be in charge of scheduling and collection of rents/fees. No rental shall be scheduled so as to conflict with any scheduled activity by a Member Department. Any rents/fees collected in excess of current year operating expenses may, at the Chiefs' Board's discretion, be retained for repair, improvements to the facility, future operating expenses, or returned to the Member Departments. 13. Chiefs' Board. The Chiefs' Board shall consist of the Fire Chief or the Fire Chief's designee of each Member Department unless another representative is designated by the City Council of a Member. The Board shall act by majority vote of a quorum present at a board meeting (unless unanimous approval is required by this Agreement) duly called by a member of the Board upon notice given to -5- all members by mail 20 days in advance of the meeting. The Board may act without a meeting by a unanimous writing in lieu of a meeting. 14. Operations Committee. The Operations Committee shall consist of a firefighter/officer appointed by the Fire Chief of each Member Department. 15. Indemnification. Each non -Member Department or organization using the facility shall fully indemnify the Member Departments against all loss, damage liability claims, suits, judgments, costs and expenses by reason of loss of or damage to property and injury to or death of persons caused by acts or omissions of the non-member organization, its officers, agents or employees, arising from or growing out of, directly or indirectly, wholly or partly, its maintenance, operation or use of the facility. 16. Termination of Agreement. Any Member Department may terminate its participation under this Agreement by giving 60 days advance written notice of intent to terminate, directed to the attention of the remaining Members of the Chiefs' Board. The terminating Member Department has no right of refund for its share of fees or costs paid under this Agreement, and waives any and all rights and interest in the training facility. Furthermore, any city terminating its participation under this Agreement is bound to pay its proportionate share of •the initial construction costs. Said city shall also be -6- 'responsible for its proportionate share of outstanding operating costs through the fiscal year in which it gives notice of withdrawal. A withdrawing member shall have no claim to assets of the Association including excess fees or rents collected under paragraph 12. Upon the withdrawal of all Member Departments, the land and imorovements shall revert to the City of Fridley. 17. Dissolution. Upon unanimous approval by the Member Departments, the dissolution of this Association may be adopted, at which time the Building and Property shall revert to the City of Fridley, and all other assets and liabilities shall be divided among the remaining Member Departments in proportion to the contribution of the remaining Member Departments. 18. Amendment. Any amendments to this Agreement require a two-thirds vote of the Members of the Chiefs' Board and must be approved by the City Councils for each party. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers by authority of their respective governing bodies. City of Fridley May/or City Manager 17 l lli' Ai /- Date' -7- City of Columbia Heights Mayor City Manager :e City of Brooklyn Center Mayor City Manager Date City of Blaine yor City Manager City of Spring /Lake Park Mayor City Manager' Date City of Mounds View Mayor C1 er%-Ar,4,Ti strator iZ-Z6-9 O to Date -8- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION STAFF REPORT CITY C0UNCII. MEETING DATE September 13, 1993 Agenda Section:9.a 7:05n.m. ReportNumber.93-615C Report Date: 9-8-93 Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business ❑ Public Hearings G Consent Agenda ® Council Business Item Description: Continuation of Public Rearing to Consider Request for Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Continued Use of a Temporary Structure at 7901 Red Oak Drive, Planning Case 366- :Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. , ExplanationiSummary (attach suppletaeat sheets m necessary.) SUMMARY: As directed by the City Council following discussion at the September 7, 1993 Work Session, Staff has prepared the attached Resolution for consideration on the requested Conditional Use Permit. If you have any questions or, would like to review any documents submitted as part of this application, please let me know and those items will be provided. Paul Harrington, RECOMMENDATION: ty Planner Adopt City Council Resolution No. 4409 approving the requested Conditional Use permit for Church Upon the Rock, 7901 Red Oak Drive, Planning Case No. 366-93. RESOLUTION NO. 4409 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A TEMPORARY PORTABLE CLASSROOM FOR CHURCH UPON THE ROCK, 7901 RED OAK DRIVE PLANNING CASE NO. 366-93 WHEREAS, Church Upon the Rock has made application for a Conditional Use classroomoatallow 7901for Redthe Oakcontinued Drive; and useof a temporary portable WHEREAS, In 1988, the Mounds View city Council gave approval for a Conditional Use Permit forthe placement of a temporary portable classroom on the property; and WHEREAS, the approved Citv Council resolution con- tained a "sunset" clause, which effectively revoked the permit after a five year period; and WHEREAS, the current request is in response to the sunsetting of the previous approval; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval in Resolution No. 365-93. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the requested Conditional Use Permit for the location of a temporary portable classroom for Church Upon the Rock, 7901 Red Oak Drive, contingent upon the following: 1. The approved temporary portable classroom shall be removed from the property no later than July 1, i994. 2. The parking lot and driveways o n the property shall be surfaced with City approved materials no later than October 1, 1993. Resolution No. 4409 ?age Two ATTEST: (SEAL) 3. The exterior of the principal building and the temporary portable classroom shall be painted no later than November 1, 1993. Adopted this 13th day of September, 1993. mayor Clerk -Administrator Mgs REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION my STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MMTING DATE September 13, 1993 AgendaSecdon: 9.b, 7:06o.m. Report Number.93-616C _ Report Date: 9-8-93 Council Action: O Special Order of Business ❑ Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda ® Council Business Item Description: Continuation of Introduction of Ordinance No. 528, Repeal of Sunset Provision Of Street Light UWf—ty, Ordinance No. 528 Administrators Review/Recommendation: • No comments to supplement this report • Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach suppleene6c sheets as SUMMARY, At the August 23, 1993, City Council meeting, consideration of Ordinance No. 528 that would repeal the sunset clause of the Street Light Utility was tabled. This extra time afforded the opportunity for the new Councilmember to come on board and to clarify some questions that had arisen, which was done at the September 7, 1993, Council Work Session. When the Street Light Utility was created, it was given a sunset date. The reason for the sunset clause was to allow the City Council to reevaluate the effectiveness of the Utility, to allow an opportunity to reexamine its rate structure and determine if the Utility would be continued or discontinued. It is important to note that action taken on this item would either continue or discontinue the Street Light Utility. If this Utility were to be continued, the rates could be changed after the fate of the Utility has been decided. The rate structure could be changed via resolution, effective January 1, 19�4. i Tim Cruikshank, Asst. to City Admin. RECOMMENDATION: A staff recommendation is not made for this item. The options are to waive the reading and formally introduce Ordinance No. 528, repeal of the sunset clause of the Street Light Utility or a motion to deny approval. ORDINANCE NO. 528 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 72.08 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW TO CONTINUE A STREET LIGHTING UTILITY PROGRAM TO OPERATE, MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE THE LIGHTING OF CITY STREETS, The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION 1. Purpose. By Ordinance No. 497, the City Council enacted a street lighting utility program for the purpose of operating, maintaining and improving the street lighting in the City. The Ordinance contained a sunset provision stating that it would automatically be terminated as of December 31, 1993 unless extended by the City Council. The City Council deems that it is in the best interest of the public to repeal the sunset provision. SECTION 2. Section 72.08 of the Mounds View Municipal Code is hereby repealed. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance is effective 30 days after its publication. Introduced to the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this the 13th day of September, 1993. Read and adopted by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this the th day of , 1993. ATTEST (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Mayor Clerk -Administrator — .. Agenda Seron: l O. A REWEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIMER MON :pet N„�� 93-617C V STAFF REPORT Report Date: 9-8-93 :+ Councl Aron: -• C Special Order ofBusiness CITY COW. C1L.N ETIIVGDATE September 13, 1993 C Public Hearings C ConsencAgerda Council Business item Descmpdon: Continuation of Action on Ordinance No. 529 Establishing a Surface Water Utility And Amending %lounds View Nlunicipal Code by Adding Chapter 73 Administrators RevrewrRecommendamon: • No comments to supplement :his report - Comments aracbed. ExplanatiotvSummarl !artae4 supplement sheets as aeremarl.) STTNMARY, At the August 23rd City Council meeting, consideration of adoption of Ordinance No. 529 Establishing a Surface Water Management Utility was tabled to the meeting of September 13, 1993. In the interim time, staff was directed to examine an alternative rate structure which would lessen the burden of the utility charges to the City's business community. The alternative was developed by Rocky Keene, the City's consulting hydrologist from SEH, and presented for Council review at the September 7th Work Session. The basis of the alternative rate structure is one in which the type of soil was changed from Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Type B soil to Type A which is a more sandy soil condition and is actually more consistent with the soil types in the majority of the areas of the City which have been developed by commercial or industrial businesses. Changing the soil type reduced the potential run-off factor, thereby decreasing the utility factor and overall rate. The alternative rate structure (attached herein as "Scenario No 2) would raise the yearly residential household cost by $.91. It would also raise the yearly costs for church and school property classifications. The original rate structure is included herein as Scenario No. 1. At the September 7th Council Work Session, Rocky Keene explained the plans regarding each of the proposed surface water management projects as outlined in the City's Surface Water Management Plan. He will also be present Monday night to discuss in greater detail the plans for each of the projects and describe the impact on the City of either completing or not completing the proposed projects. r,,. 4,,i, I: ; Jr�„ Samantha Orduno, City Administrator RECOMMENDATION Staff does not have a formal recommendation regarding the Surface Water Management Utility. Action can either be to adopt or not adopt the ordinance. The vote required to adopt the ordinance Is a simple majority (3 votes). If the Council so chooses to adopt the ordinance, consideration must be given as to which 'scenario' you wish to adopt - No. 1 which is the original utility factors, or No. 2 which is the alternative utility factors. Ordinance #1 reflects the Scenario No. 1, Ordinance #2 reflects the alternative utility factor structure. STAFF REPORT PAGE TWO SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 I know there has been concerns expressed in the community that there is a lack of understanding regarding the proposed projects and their impact on the City overall and, more specially, certain areas of the City. Hopefully, the concerns will be satisfactorily addressed at the meeting. The proposed ordinance is the "establishment" of the utility. If approved, the next step will be to adopt a resolution which formally sets the fee structure. That action could take place at a future meeting. Previous discussions regarding the anticipated expenditures of the surface water management have noted that street sweeping, catch basin cleaning, equipment repair and consulting engineering services would be included in the expenditures as these expenditures are currently be paid out of the existing storm water management fund. There has evidently been some confusion as to the City having two funds, one Storm Water and the other Surface Water. It is proposed that the current Storm Water Management Fund be renamed Surface Water Management Fund to be consistent with the Surface Water Management Plan. There will not be two separate funds. On December 31, 1992, the Storm Water Management Fund had a balance of $150,038 (as per the City's audited financial report). The 1993 budget for storm water management provides for a expenditures of $47, 031. As of August 31, 1993, the SWM budget has had expenditures totalling $16,199.44. Of the $47,031 budgeted for SWM for 1993, $8,000 is anticipated revenues of $3,500 in interest and $4,500 in connection charges. A total of $39,031 has been budgeted as a appropriation from the $150,038 balance in the SWM Fund. As of August 31, 1993, the SWM Fund had a balance of $134,444. Attached herein are the fund sheets from the 1993 budget. If the City were to continue to fund the afore mentioned activities from the existing SWM Fund, at the 1993 rate of revenues and expenditures, the Fund, as it is set up today, would be depleted in less than 5 years. The current SWM Fund does not provide for the completion of any projects. SCENARIO NO. 1 oeldlNiv, CITY: MOUNDS VIEW r7 JOB NO.: 91205 <' DATE: 6-18-93 RAINFALL: 2 IN. ANNUAL REVENUE: $114,808 5 YR REVENUE: $574,p90_� YEARLY COST/HOUSEROLD: 15•96/ _ _ __REVISED6118/93RJK I I RUNOFF TOTAL I UTILITY QUARTERLY I COSTS • YEARLY , POT". PROPERTY RUNOFF I AREA VOLUME RUNOFF = FACTOR I TOTAL _ PER I -PER - - PER FOflA FIVE ZONING (INCHES) . (ACRES) (AC.In) 1. CONTRIB. ACRE _ HSHLD HSHLD ACRE SITE Rl & R2 0.30 1394 413.2 39,51: 1.00 $11.333 $835 N/A $21.81 $3.99 NA 415.96 NA NA $436.15 R3 0. 80 38 30.4 2.9% 2,66 93.7 9.0% 3.26 $2,569 $26.47 NA NA $529.46 97 R4 0.80 97 0.97 81.2 3.26 $2,228 26.47 NA NA $529.46 54 $529.46 R51R0 _ _89 __ 81.2.3.4 L 1_24 121 .__._�524---19�. .___ 4.17 __ , $2,391 __326.4 $26.47 .DNA NA NA NA $529.45 11 0.97 90 87.2 6.3% 3.26 0.3%� 0.46 $92 $3.70 NA NA $74.10 CRP 1,14 25 3.4 110 45.0 4.3% 1.28 $1,234 $10.45 NA NA $208.96 PF 0.30 1.09 107 117.6 11.2% 3.69 $3,225 $30.00 NA NA NA 09 $243 85 $243.85 PUD SCIIOOL/CHURCII 0.44 56 24.8 2.4% 1.50 $601 $12.19 NA STREET/HOW I 561I-- 239 L - - - ------------__ WATER _ I _ L - _ - - TOTAL 29'0 1046,52 100.01. $28.702 (1) UTILITY FACTOR IS RUNOFF (INCHES) DIVIDED BY RUNOFF (INCIIES) FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL pit)-COSIPER ACRE FOR RESIDENT IAL AREA IS: $8.13 (2) TOTAL QUARTERLY COST FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIALIS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL REVENUE EQUAL TO THE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL RUNOFF QUARTERLY ACRE COST FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLIED BY (3) COST PER ACRE IS PER UTILITY FACTOR FOR PROPERTIES OTIIER T 1AN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL EQUAL (4) TOTAL QUARTERLY COSTS COST PER ACRE TIMES TOTAL ACRES NUMBER(5) ASSUMED HOUSEHOLDSIS2040 (6) AVERAGE AlA R2 LOT SIZE I S 0 29 ACRES PROPERTY ZONING R 16 R2 R3 R4 R51R0 B1,2,3,4 CRP PF PUD SCHOOLICHURCI STREETIROW i,WATER­ TOTAL SCENARIO NO. 2 CITY: MOUNDS VIEW JOB NO.:91205 DATE:6-18-93 RAINFALL: ANNUAL REVENUE: 5 YR REVENUE: YEARLY COSTIHOUSEHOLD: RUNOFFJJACRE AREA (INCHESS) 0.30 1394 0 80 36 0.97 97 0 7 64 121 060 90 0. 14� 25 0.30 116 1.03 107 0.60 56 561 238 2 IN. $114,808 $57 $16.87 RUNOFF I TOTAL VOLUME ; RUNOFF= (AC.In) ; %CONTRIB. 413.2 41.71i 30.4 3.1% 937 9.54P 81.2 8.2% 4. V2 ° 4.61 5.5% J,4 0.3% 45.0 4.51. 110.5 11.2% 33.8 3 4°% UTILITY QUARTERLY COST TOTAL I PER ACRE 1.00 $11,975 NIA 2.68 $882 $23.04 3,26 $2,715 427.97 326 52,354 27.97 613 29. 2.04 $1,582 $17.52 0.46 $97 $3.91 1.28 51,304 511.04 3.47 13,2% $29.79 2.04 $978 $17.52 2930 990A2 100 D% $28,702 (1)RESIDENTAL((R1)-COSTPE(RACREFORHESIDENTIALARE(AISHE9)F$0 SINGLE FAMILY (2) TOTAL OUARTERLY COST FOR SINGLE FAMILY RE SIDE NTIALIS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL QUARTERLY REVENUE EQUAL TO THE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL RUNOFF (3) COST PER ACRE IS PER ACRE COST FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLIED By UTILITY FACTOR (4) TOTAL QUARTERLY COSTS F011 PROPERTIES OTHERTHAN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. EQUAL COST PER ACRE TIMES TOTALACRES I61 AVERMED AGE R18 NUMBER2 LOT SIZE IS 0.291DSIS ACRESb40 REVISED 6/16/93 RJK . g._"';; 'YEARLYCOST: ?; - PEfl PER FORA FIVE HSHLD HSHLD_ ]ACRE -SITE $4.22 $16.87 NA NA NA $460.85 NA NA $559.45 NA NA $559.45 NA NA $595.80 NA NA $350.39 NA NA $78.29 NA NA $220.80 NA NA $595.80 NA NA $350.39 �IIAN6E )*j ;rwooSYLlAL pN0 QUl1N� -zL k �t4/vY ,iQ J(. �GoSS �UNO FP �j 7EA11141) �cF7 omen LANO USE6 IK IS' NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 529 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY AND AMENDING THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 73 The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. General Operation. Subdivision 1. The Municipal surface water system shall be operated as a public utility (hereinafter called the Surface Water Management Utility), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, from which revenues will be derived subject to the provisions of this Chapter and Minnesota Statutes. The Mounds View Municipal Code is amended by adding Chapter 73 to be entitled, "Surface Water Management Utility". Subdivision 2. Findings and Determinations. In providing for such charges, the findings and determinations are as follows: (a) In the exercise of its governmental authority and in order to promote the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare, the City has constructed, operated and maintained a surface water system ("the system"). This section is adopted in the further exercise and authority and for the same purpose. (b) The system, as constructed, heretofore has been financed and paid for through the ad valorem taxes and assessments. Such financing methods were appropriate to the circumstances at the time they were used. It is now necessary and desirable to provide an alternative method of recovering some or all of the future costs of improving, maintaining and operating the system through the imposition of user charges. (c) In imposing charges, it is necessary to establish a methodology that undertakes to make them just and equitable. Taking into account the status of completion of the system, past methods of recovering system costs, the topography of the City and other relevant factors, it is determined that it would be just and equitable to assign responsibility for some or all of the future costs of operating, maintaining and improving the system on the basis of the expected storm water runoff from the various parcels of land within the City during a standard one-year rain'.all event. (d) Assigning costs and making charges based upon typical storm water runoff cannot be done with mathematical precision but can only be accomplished within reasonable and practical limits. The provisions of this section undertake to establish a reasonable and practical methodology for making such charges. ORDINANCE NO. 529 PAGE TWO OF FOUR SECTION II. Definitions Utility Factor. (A) Utility Factor. The utility factor is defined as the ratio of runoff volume, in inches, for a particular land use, to the runoff volume, in inches for an average single-family residential lot, assuming a 2-inch rainfall and Soil Conservation Service (SCS) 'Type B" soil conditions. (B) Surface Water Management Fee. The surface water management fee is defined as the quarterly charge developed for each parcel of land pursuant to this Chapter. (C) Quarterly Surface Water Management Revenue Requirement. The quarterly surface water management revenue requirement is the estimated quarterly expenditures for planning and inventories, capital expenditures, personnel, equipment and operation of the surface water utility, in accordance with established City policy. The quarterly surface water management revenue requirement and resulting surface water management fees shall be established for a period of time as set by City Council resolution. SECTION III. Surface Water Management Fee. (A) The Surfa:e Water Management Fee shall be determined by first determining the percentage of total runoff in the City which is attributed to Residential property. The Total Fee for all Residential property in the City is computed by multiplying the runoff percentage by one -quarter (1/4) of the annual Surface Water Management Revenue Requirement. The Residential Surface Water Management Fee, per acre, is determined by dividing the Total Residential Fee by the estimated total acres of Residential land use in the City. A The Surface Water Management Fee for Residential, Townhomes/condominiums, Apartments and Mobile Home Parks will be determined on a per -household basis rather than a per acre basis. The Fee per household is determined by first determining the Total Fee for each land use. The Total Fee for each land use is determined by multiplying the Total Fee for all Residential property by the appropriate utility factor based on land use. The Total Fee is then divided by the total number of households for the particular land use, resulting in cost per household. (C) The Surface Water Management Fee for all individual parcels, excluding residential, shall be defined as the product of (1) the Residential Surface Water Management Fee (per acre); (2) the appropriate utility factor based on land use, and (3) the total acreage of the parcel. Subdivision 1. Credits. The Council may adopt policies, by resolution, for adjustment of the surface water management fees. Information to justify a fee adjustment must be supplied by the property owner. Such adjustments of fees shall not be retroactive unless provided within said resolution. Credits will be reviewed regularly by a staff committee. ORDINANCE NO. 529 PAGE THREE OF FOUR Subdivision 2. Surface Water Management Utility Factors. The utility factors for various land uses are as follows: Classification Land Use Utility Factor R1, R2 Single & Two Family Residential 1.0 R-3 Medium Density Residential 2.66 R-4, R-5, 11-0 High Density Residential, Mobile Homes, 3.26 Residential Office B-1, 8-2, P-3, B-4 Neighborhood Business, Umited Business, 4.17 Highway Business, Regional Business 1-1 Industrial 3.26 PF Public Facilities 1.29 PUC Planned Unit Development 3.69 CRP Conservancy, Recreation & Presentation 0.46 School/Church Public/Private 1.5 Subdivision 4. Other Land Uses. Other land uses not listed in the foregoing table shall be classified by the City Administrator by assigning them to the classes most nearly like the listed uses, from the standpoint of probable hydrologic response. Appeals from the City Administrator's determination of the proper classifications may be made to the City Council in the same manner as other appeals from administrative determinations. SECTION IV. Adiustments of Management Fees The City Council may by resolution, from time to time, adopt policies providing for the adjustment of management fees for parcels or groups of parcels, based upon hydrologic data supplied by affected property owners, demonstrating an actual hydrologic response substantially different from the Utility Factor being used for the parcel or parcels. SECTION V. Excluded Lands. No management fee for system availability or service shall be made against land which is public street right-of-way. SECTION VI. Supplying Information. The owner, occupant or person in charge of any premises shall supply the City with such information as the City may reasonably request related to the use, development and area of the premises. Willful failure to provide such information or to falsify it is a violation of this subsection. SECTION VII. Estimated Charges. If the owner, occupant or person in charge of any premises fails or refuses to provide information requested under Section VI, the management fee for such premises shall be estimated and billed in accordance with such estimate, based upon information then available to the City. SECTION Vill. Billings and Collections. Bills for Surface Water Management fees for the use and availability of the system shall be rendered by the Finance Department in accordance with usual and customary practice in rendering of water and sanitary sewer service bills. Bills shall be rendered quarterly, shall be payable at the office of the City ORDINANCE NO. 529 PAGE FOUR OF FOUR Finance Department and may be rendered in conjunction with billings for water or sanitary sewer service, or both. SECTION IX. Penalties and Remedies for Delinquent or Default in PBVInq Bills. Penalties and remedies for late payments or non-payment of billings shall be the same as those applicable to billings rendered for water and sanitary sewer service. SECTION X. Use of Revenues. Revenues received from charges shall be placed in the "surface water management utility account' and shall be used to finance operational costs and improvements to and betterment of the system. SECTION XI. EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this ordinance is 30 days after its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 9th day of August, 1993. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 23rd day of August, 1993. ATTEST: (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attomey Mayor City Administrator NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 529 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY AND AMENDING THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 73 The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. General Operation. Subdivision 1. The Municipal surface water system shall be operated as a public utility (hereinafter called the Surface Water Management Utility), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, from which revenues will be derived subject to the provisions of this Chapter and Minnesota Statutes. The Mounds View Municipal Code is amended by adding Chapter 73 to be entitled, "Surface Water Management Utility". Subdivision 2. Findings and Determinations. In providing for such charges, the findings and determinations are as follows: (a) In the exercise of its governmental authority and in order to promote the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare, the City has constructed, operated and maintained a surface water system ('the system"). This section is adopted in the further exercise and authority and for the same purpose. (b) The system, as constructed, heretofore has been financed and paid for through the ad valorem taxes and assessments. Such financing methods were appropriate to the circumstances at the time they were used. It is now necessary and desirable to provide an alternative method of recovering some or all of the future costs of improving, maintaining and operating the system through the imposition of user charges. (c) In imposing charges, it is necessary to establish a methodology that undertakes to make them just and equitable. Taking into account the status of completion of the system, past methods of recovering system costs, the topography of the City and other relevant factors, it is determined that it would be just and equitable to assign responsibility for some or all of the future costs of operating, maintaining and improving the system on the basis of the expected storm water runoff from the various parcels of land within the City during a standard one-year rainfall event. (d) Assigning costs and making charges based upon typical storm water runoff cannot be done with mathematical precision but can only be accomplished within reasonable and practical limits. The provisions of this section undertake to establish a reasonable and practical methodology for making such charges. ORDINANCE NO. 529 PAGE TWO OF FOUR SECTION II. Definitions Utility Factor. (A) Utility Factor. The utility factor is defined as the ratio of runoff volume, in inches, for a particular land use, to the runoff volume, in inches for an average single-family residential lot, assuming a 2-inch rainfall and Soil Conservation Service (SCS) "Type B" soil conditions. (B) Surface Water Management Fee. The surface water management fee is defined as the quarterly charge developed for each parcel of land pursuant to this Chapter. (C) Quarterly Surface Water Management Revenue Requirement. The quarterly surface water management revenue requirement is the estimated quarterly expenditures for planning and inventories, capital expenditures, personnel, equipment and operation of the surface water utility, in accordance with established City policy. The quarterly surface water management revenue requirement and resulting surface water management fees shall be established for a period of time as set by City Council resolution. SECTION III. Surface Water Management Fee. (A) The Surface Water Management Fee shall be determined by first determining the percentage of total runoff in the City which is attributed to Residentia property. The Total Fee for all Residential property in the City is computed by multiplying the runoff percentage by one -quarter (1/4) of the annual Surface Water Management Revenue Requirement. The Residential Surface Water Management Fee, per acre, is determined by dividing the Total Residential Fee by the estimated total acres of Residential land use in the City. (B) The Surface Water Management Fee for Residential, Townhomes/condominiums, Apartments and Mobile Home Parks will be determined on a per -household basis rather than a per acre basis. The Fee per household is determined by first determining the Total Fee for each land use. The Total Fee for each land use is determined by multiplying the Total Fee for all Residential property by the appropriate utility factor based on land use. The Total Fee is then divided by the total number of households for the particular land use, resulting in cost per household. (C) The Surface Water Management Fee for all individual parcels, excluding residential, shall be defined as the product of (1) the Residential Surface Water Management Fee (per acre); (2) the appropriate utility factor based on land use, and (3) the total acreage of the parcel. Subdivision 1. Credits. The Council may adopt policies, by resolution, for adjustment of the surface water management fees. Information to justify a fee adjustment must be supplied by the property owner. Such adjustments of fees shall not be retroactive unless provided within said resolution. Credits will be reviewed regularly by a staff committee. ORDINANCE NO. 529 PAGE THREE OF FOUR Subdivision 2. Surface Water Management Utility Factors. The utility factors for various land uses are as follows: Classification land Use Utility Factor Al. R2 Single & Two Family Residential 1.0 R-3 Medium Density Residential 2.68 R-4, R-S, R-0 High Density Residential, Mobile Homes, 3.26 Residential Office B-1, B-2, B-3, B-4 Neighborhood Business, Limited Business, 3.47 Highway Business, Regional Business 1.1 Industrial 2.04 PF Public Facilities 128 PUD Planned Unit Development 3.47 CRP Conservancy, Recreation & Presentation 0.46 School/Church Public/Private 2.04 Subdivision 4. Other Land Uses. Other land uses not listed in the foregoing table shall be classified by the City Administrator by assigning them to the classes most nearly like the listed uses, from the standpoint of probable hydrologic response. Appeals from the City Administrator's determination of the proper classifications may be made to the City Council in the same manner as other appeals from administrative determinations. SECTION IV. Adjustments of Management Fees. The City Council may by resolution, from time to time, adopt policies providing for the adjustment of management fees for parcels or groups of parcels, based upon hydrologic data supplied by affected property owners, demonstrating an actual hydrologic response substantially different from the Utility Factor being used for the parcel or parcels. SECTION V. Excluded Lands. No management fee for system availability or service shall be made against land which is public street right-of-way. SECTION VI. Supplying Information. The owner, occupant or person in charge of any premises shall supply the City with such information as the City may reasonably request related to the use, development and area of the premises. Willful failure to provide such information or to falsify it is a violation of this subsection. SECTION VII. Estimated Charges. If the owner, occupant or person in charge of any premises fails or refuses to provide information requested under Section VI, the management fee for such premises shall be estimated and billed in accordance with such estimate, based upon information then available to the City. SECTION Vill. Billings and Collections. Bills for Surface Water Management fees for the use and availability of the system shall be rendered by the Finance Department in accordance with usual and customary practice in rendering of water and sanitary sewer service bills. Bills shall be rendered quarterly, shall be payable at the office of the City ORDINANCE NO. 529 PAGE FOUR OF FOUR Finance Department and may be rendered in conjunction with billings for water or sanitary sewer service, or both. SECTION IX. Penalties and Remedies for Delinquent or Default in Paving Bills. Penalties and remedies for late payments or non-payment of billings shall be the same as those applicable to billings rendered for water and sanitary sewer service. SECTION X. Use of Revenues. Revenues received from charges shall be placed in the "surface water management utility account" and shall be used to finance operational costs and improvements to and betterment of the system. SECTION XI. EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this ordinance is 30 days after its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 9th day of August, 1993. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 23rd day of August, 1993. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney STOR.YI WATER NIANAGEN E\T FLIND M, TNUE COWN ENTARY A Storm Water Management Fund was established. pursuant to Chapter 25 of the City Code, to provide for the preservation and improvement of storm water drainage facilities within the City of Mounds Yew. Am, person who applies for a building permit and whose land the City Engineer determines contributes storm water to the City storm water drainage system shall pay a storm water management charge as determined by applicable provisions of the City Code. Storm Water Manamment Charges shall be used only for expenses incurred in the design. construction, preservation, or improvement of City storm water management systems. Those expenses shall include, but shall not be Limited to, acquisition of land, wetlands and easements, construction of water quality control improvements, preservation of wetlands and retirement of debt issued in connection with storm water management system improvements. During 1993 it is estimated that the Fund will receive S4,500 in connection charges and earn 53.500 in interest income. Approximately 539,031 of fund balance will be used for 1993 expenditures. CITY OF HOUNDS VIEW 1993 BUDGETED REVENUES 420 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FUND IIEN DESCRIPTION CHARGES FOR SERVICES ------------------- 3472 CONNECTION CHARGES TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES h-r w; : 5ur,N Xz 3901 INTEREST INCONE 3850 APPROPRIATION - FUND BALANCE 3961 TRANSFERS TOTAL OTHER REVENUES GRAND TOTAL STORM WATER MGT FUND 1990 1991 1992 1993 ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED PROPOSED $11,315 $6,028 $0 $4,500 $11,315 $6,028 SO $4,500 $19,096 $14,389 $0 $3,500 $0 $0 $27,481 $39,031 $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,096 $14,389 $27,481 $42,531 $30,411 $20,417 $27,481 $47,031 STORM WATER NIANAGENEENT FUND EXTENDITLRE COINDIE.` TARY Dunne 1993 the Storm Rater Management Fund will finance the maintenance of City storm drainaee facilities and street sweeping Storm sewer maintenance activities include storm sewer cleaning, catca basin marking, and maintenance of storm water inlet and outlet devices and structures. Apprmcimately 1,359 man - hours are budgeted for these storm sewer maintenance and street sweeping activities. In addition the purchase of computer software for monitoring impacts on wetlands will be financed by the Fund. During 1993 the City will be replacing it's truck mounted jet rudder which is used to clean sanitary sewers and storm sewers. The Storm Rater Management Fund will contribute 510,739 toward the purchase of the jet rudder. The estimated cost of the jet rodder is 5175,718. The balance of the cost will be paid from the Sewer Utility Fund. :1 OF MOUNDS TIER DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET DETAIL - 1993 EXPENDITURES 20-4121 STORM RATER MANAGEMENT FUND IUD 1991 1992 1992 DEPARTMENT TEAM COUNCIL TIM DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ,,,DUAL BUDGETED ESTIMATED REQUESTS REQUESTS APPROVES ERSONHEL SERVICES 10 SALARIES, REGULAR 20 SALARIES, TEND/PART-TINE 30 PENSIONS )10 GROUP INSURANCE )50 WORKERS CCMIPENSATION TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES MATERIALS + SUPPLIES 160 SUPPLIES, OPERATING 240 UNIFORMS + CLOTHING TOTAL MATERIALS + SUPPLIES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 303 OTBTR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 341 LEGAL NOTICES 363 TRAINING 380 MILEAGE 357 STREET SWEEPING TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 $0 $18,482 $18,482 $11,528 $11,528 $11,528 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,242 $2,212 $1,398 $1,J98 $1,198 $0 $0 $2,546 $2,546 $1,/31 $1,131 $1,431 $0 $0 $1,560 $1,560 $755 $755 r $755 $0 $0 $24,830 $24,830 $15,112 $15,112 $15,112 $1,025 $130 $2,350 $2,350 $1,950 $1,950 $1,950 $0 $0 $301 $301 $180 $180 $180 $1,025 $130 $2,651 $2,651 $2,130 $2,130 $2,130 $29,401 $17,747 $0 $0 $12,500 $8,560 $8,560 $1,348 $475 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $450 0 $0 $$50 650 $$`50 $$50 $0 $19,819 $0 $0 $0 $0 --- $0 $30,749 $38,041 $0 ~ 50 $13,100 $9,060 $9,060 22 703 EQUIPMENT $71,3$0 705 CONSTRUCTION $0 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $71,322 GRAND TOTAL STORK WATER MANAGEMENT $103,096 $0 $0 $0 $0 $51000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $15,729 $5,000 $0 $0 -$0 $0 y $0 $15,000 $10,000 $20,729 $38,171 $27,481 $r,681 $45,112 $36,302 $0,031 107 Agenda Section: I D. H M-ES REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION RaporcNumber. 91-618C STAFF REPORT Council Action: o_H_Q� Z;? - Coundl Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE September 13, 1993 Public Hearings Q Convent Agenda Q Council Business Item Description: Consideration of Approval of Contract Documents for Proposed City Nall Expansion Admimstrators Review/Recommendation: �r�-- • No comments to supplement this report • Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach mpplemeat sheen as uecessuY.) SCARY: The next step in the City Hall expansion project is to consider approving the floor plans as discussed at the September 7, 1993, Council agenda session. on Monday evening, Milt Powell, the project manager from Bonestroo and Associates, will present the proposed final floor plan and the specifications of the project for your consideration. Mr. Powell will also discuss some of the materials that will be used and give an update on the actual cost of the project. Approval of this information would mean authorization for Bonestroo and Associates to advertise for bids from general construction contractors to begin the construction phase of the project. It is anticipated the bids could be received by 10/8/93 and brought to the 10/11/93 regular City Council meeting for your consideration. If the bid were to be awarded at the 10/11/93 meeting, construction could begin 10/18/93. Tim Cruikshank, Asst. to City Admin. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of contract documents (plans and specifications) authorizing Bonestroo and Associates to advertise for bids from general construction contractors. Sonestroo OcoG k'v. PE PAW Am PE' M C A/YA"'. PE N jm4 Lrlel PE C 1n A Gunn PE TCOCI T PYthn[ PE AMae Al a•; A'CP PP pJ % PE W PE V119 JCPOn PE E P w4 Wl PE l PE Rosene . VMnE am+! PE E eano PE qll�D" W Eavr1 PE DAA C modu PE Mallo .mn P Jj N C Jam PE A'e, a lM Q' CryD 4.V P PC V'Wm P iaaa Earn PE ® Anderlik & GP 1 P % vE '-M' E � vE Po . C 4 ,e, If A 9MMaan PE , C xry D 5l— C kat a Agars. PE 4m P Yaw vE DM'VSP,"P J PE 4'.M G k .yn(r1 TE Vl,. Ulr1 A '.+n1p1 PE A[rM.n> `r,^A"f]r PE 3,n , vuwn D Gu1tL'M PC Associates S ur V Earn CPA YMN , bOP,A— PE 'A". P Pot °E C.. d e PE •'w^a Canw^.+m !a [ P14 PE %W` A k. PE PAO G 'T+!'. PE rh; +%P AnIX'wn Ai A GJy W Vi V PE L P (paPr. PE Engineers & Architects WN4C 3.q. PE DeaOa EC 'cn PE CN'Tt A'✓nu:n T'p J, E Anal PE A >u k•-] PE W M Pa '.' 'N V"" PE Pmy 1 C','V PE wlNn U CKm VMe P L. PE Man D'A, , TE I+TH E Ergr-a" ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE SIOUNDS VIEW PARK BUILDING MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA Our File No. 43501 1.0 Foundations S 15.000 2.0 Walls 75,000 3.0 Roof 30,000 4.0 Floor 10,000 5.0 Doors & Windows 25.000 6.0 Finishes 75.000 7.0 Mechanical 60.000 8.0 Electrical 55,000 9.0 Specials 5.000 10.0 General Provisions 75.000 Total $425,000 Building Area 3750 S.F. new construction 4330 S.F. remodelled Unit Cost $69.40 PSF Expected accuracy: 10-2WItaccuracy: 10-'_0'.% Estimate does not include: Sitework, furnishings, moveable equipment. arclEitectural commission. soil I -ings. surveys 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 9 612-636-4600 Sonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects OnoGa v=PE ww Ay vE ATt,M PPq AiCP Mr,8 x1l PE Pi(AY� W ft y PE • 4fn A � PE P l Py+'e. PE L PN C-. vE p1eV1 C A,y PE POn<rt a YfePE Tr ' W Mrs PE Q, L WtI " PE NY L So PE R1114 W PoMC. PE M(nln C Lynn. PE r ,C) KWOV PE PropE loner PE 0.40 LO ' PE YmrtP MWrC. PE P L Pope, PE Gr P Cm. PE 9p C k1W1 AIA "e 0 Am., PE Peen P Yjw PE 1r ,P, E Nq , PE x,y A �. PE km l AVI- PE Dwgat 1 k, PE P G 51 11 PE Mln A ,emW vE WY P ArolryM. PE Sn 0 G'91W PE S .n M EM,n C PA W[n 1 WJm PE E W, PE CK. Cnc PE 'kra Canwt+^1 C, A Eetl PE MN. A SM PE P1WG Nne, PE 1nt j P Argrlpn .. J A Glry W Mn<n PE l v Cn .. PE Dc OC 8WGl=PE 01n lEV11=. PE Cll sA fmuW ➢Yye11 E AA9u1 PE A Pe. SW u PE Leo M PM A4 wrAe M14rtx: PE P P l Cj' . vE M'.n EI CYW M14nx�v P+u PE MI, 0'W1n1 PE A'mI En "C PROJECT SCHEDULE MOUNDS VIEW CITY HALL Our File No. 43501 9/13/93 Approval of contract documents by City Council 9/2Oi93 Plans let for bidding 9/28/93 Addendum #1 9/29/93 Pre -bid meeting 10/6i93 Bid opening 10/11/93 Approval of bids by City Council 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 0 612.636-4600 Agenda Section: 10-C I., REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Repoli Number. 91-619C s• Report Dace: 9-8-97 ST F'F REPORT Council Acton: MY Cl Special Order of Business Se tember 13, 1993 CITY COUNCIL �ETDNG DATE ❑ Public Hearings P G Consent Agenda (2 Council Business Item Description: PROPOSED 1994 PROPERTY TAX LEVY I Administrators o supplement this ri ion: - No comments m supplement this reporjt' • Comments attached. I Explanation/Summary (attach suppleteeat sheets m accessary.) RTT..NMARY: Attached please find Resolution 4418 which: 1) certifies to Ramsey County the City's Proposed 1994 Property Tax Levy, and 2) sets the City's public hearing on the 1994 Budget for Wednesday December 8, 1993 at 7:00 P.M. (if a continuation of the hearing is necessary it is scheduled for Wednesday December 15, 1993 at 7:00 p.m.). At the September 7, 1993 Work Session a donation to the Northwest Youth Service Bureau was added to the Budget. With this additional expenditure of $12,500 the city's proposed 1994 General Fund expenditures are $3,176,395; which is 6.7% more than 1993 expenditures of $2,977,750. The city's proposed 1994 property tax levy is 11.1% greater than the 1993 levy. The 1993 Legislature changed the procedure for certification of our levy to the County. For 1994 the amount of Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA) the Minnesota Department of Revenue has certified the City to receive in 1994 is to be deducted from the property tax levy certified to the County. (In previous years the County deducted the HACA from the levy.). I mention this because in order to make comparisons between the 1993 and 1994 proposed levy meaningful I used the levies before the HACA deduction. The estimated effect upon the average homeowner ($84,OCO home) is an increase in the city's share of the property tax levy of $62.53. That estimate is based upon the home's estimated market value increasing by 2.3% from 1993 to 1994 and the latest estimates of the City's aggregate net tax capacity values from the County. I have learned that the County will use updated values to prepare Truth In Taxation notices mailed to taxpayers. When those estimates become available I will recalculate the impact of the City's levy upon the average homeowner. EnclDsures -•o.%� RE�OMMENDATION: Donald erager, Fi a ce Director ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4418, CERTIFYING THE 1994 PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND SETTING THE DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SAME PURSUANT TO TRUTH IN TAXATION LEGISLATION. RESOLUTION NO. 4418 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEN COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the Council of the City of Mounds View; Minnesota was held at City Hall on September 13, 1993 with the following members present: and the following members absent: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: NG A R1994UPROPOSEDCERTIFYING PROPERTY TAX99EVIESPAN ©SETTTINGED ITHEBUDGET, DATE FCR A PUBLIC HEARING CN THE SAME PURSUANT TO TRUTH IN TAXATION LEGISLAT_ON BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota, as follows: 1) RESOLVED that pursuant to Truth in Taxation legislation the Council adopts the following as the Proposed 1994 City Operating Budget: General Fund $3,176395 Fire Improvement Bonds 100:417 TOTAL PROPOSED 1994 BUDGET T3,276,812 2) RESOLVED that pursuant to Truth In Taxation legislation the following is certified to the County of Ramsey as the City of Mounds View's proposed 1994 property tax levy(after deduction of Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid(HACA) off $366,747 which the Minnesota Department of Revenue has certified the City will receive in 1994): General Fund S1,481,506 Fire Improvement Bonds 100,417 TOTAL PROPOSED 1994 T1,581,923 PROPERTY TAX LEVY RESOLUTICN NO. 4284 PAGE TWO OF nVO 3) RESOLVED that a public hearing on the Proposed 1994 Budget and the Proposed 1994 property tax levy will be held at 7:00 p.m. on December 8, 1993 in the Council Chambers of the City belnecessary2,101 ltowadjouurn,ltheds View, public hearingota and55112. continuehitlat1a later date the reconvened hearing will be held at 7:00 p.m. on December 15, 1993 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112. The motion for adoption of the above resolution was duly by Member and upon said resolution was declared day of September 1993. ATTEST: a vote being taken, Ayes duly passed and adopted this Mayor seconded Nays, 13th (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator Tar coeparison on selected residential hoeestead properties located within the City of Mounds lieu. Proposed 1994 Levv( Includes $12,500 additional for NSYSB) Payable 1993 Tax Capacity Pate ----------------- 21.0571 dverage increase Payable 1994 Change in in Pstiiated Tar Capacity Rate Tar Rate Market Values --------------------------- --------------- 26.5041 25.871 2.301 09/09y93 1993 Estinated 1993 1993 1YY9 fstiaated 1994 Tax 1994 Net Increase Percent Increase Market Tax Net Tax Market Value Capacity Tax (Decrease) (Decrease) Value Capacity --------------- -------- --- --------------------- $50,000.00 $500.00 $105.29 $51,150.00 $511.50 $135.57 $30.28 /yr 28.161 $72,000.00 S720.00 $151.61 $73,656.00 $753.12 $199.61 $48.00 /yr 31.66% $75,000.00 $780.00 $164.24 $76,725.00 $814.50 $215.88 $51.63 /yr 31.441 584,000.00 S960.00 $202.15 $85,932.00 $998.64 $264.68 $62.53 /yr 30.931 $95,000.00 $1,180.00 $248.47 S97,185.00 $1,223.70 $324.33 $75.86 /yr 30.53% $100,000.00 S1,280.00 $269.53 $102,300.00 $1,326.00 $351.44 $81.91 /yr 30.391 $110,000.00 $1,480.00 $311.64 $112,530.00 $1,530.60 $405.67 $94.03 /yr 30.171 $1..5,000.00 S1,830.00 $385.34 $127,875.00 S1,837.50 S487.01 S101.67 /yr 26.38% SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 PROS CONS * Dedicated and stable revenue * Places the burden of payment City-wide rather than on * Revenue which is under City perceived "affected" properties. control and not subject to * Non-traditional taxing source. legislative whims. * Cost taxpayers less than property Eliminates opportunity for tax deduction or circuit breaker. tax * Properties causing or contributing * Tax exempt properties would to the need for runoff have to pay -- schools/churches management pay into the will pass on the cost. management costs. * It's just another "TAX'. * The charge is directly proportioned to runoff generated * It by-passes the assessment by specific class properties. procedure. * Can work in conjunction with * "Not as accountable to the assessment procedures. public.' * Provides for a funding * Additional initial administrative mechanism which earns interest costs. rather than pays interest (such as bonding). * Audited per State Law as are other City utilities. * Exemption from the tax can be granted. There are no exemptions for property tax. * Expands the City's ability to manage surface water in a way that does not interfere with budget peaks and valleys. * The cost savings with the utility vs. property taxes (per tax payer) may, in most cases, be greater than the amount saved by a tax deduction or circuit breaker. 2/90 3.5 FINANCING Paying for storm water management projects has become more complex in recent years. In the past, special assessments against benefited properties financed most of the necessary improvements. However, with recent legislation, the financial options have broadened considerably. The major categories of funding sources are Ad Valorem Taxes, Special Taxes, Special Assessments, User charges, and Grants. Following is a description and financing principles used with each of these financing mechanisms. Table 3.4 identifies the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Ad Valorem A. General Taxes This is the most common method of generating revenues to finance general government services including minor maintenance measures for drainage and water quality facilities. Using property tax has the effect of spreading the cost over the entire tax base of a community. H. Special Tax District (M.S. 473.875 to 473.883) This is similar to administrative structure under general taxation except that all or part of the community may be placed in the tax district. The principle is to better correlate improvement costs to benefited or contributing properties. Special Assessment (M.S. 42^) The City is familiar with the use of special assessments to finance special services from maintenance of sidewalks to construction of capital improvements. The assessments are levied against properties benefiting from the special services. The philosophy of this method is that the benefited properties pay in relation to benefits received (increase in the market value of the property). 3.5 - 1 2/90 Building Permits, Land Development Fees & Land Exaction As land is developed or built upon, surface water runoff and pollution loading increases. Administrative and capital costs can be recovered at the time of building permit issuance or land development approval. The City can require dedication of land for ponding or drainage purposes. The land, however, must be from the parcel being developed. User Charges (M.S. 444.075) User charges, such as a storm water utility, is a mechanism by which a City can generate funds through billings similar to water and sewer billings. The principle in this method is to charge for services rendered to properties generating runoff, as well as the service to properties being protected from the effects of runoff, without consideration to an increase in market value of the property. The utility approach is further detailed in a supplemental report, "Financing Storm Water Projects Using a Storm Water Utility," under a separate cover. Grants State grants are available for surface water management and nonpoint source pollution. It is generally not a good financial practice to rely on grants for a service program because this source of revenue is not dependable and requires constant speculation as to its availability. Grants are useful but they should be used only to supplement a planned local revenue source. A. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Previously the MPCA had Federal matching funds for preserving and protecting lakes and for enhancing their public use and enjoyment, under the Federal Clean Lakes Program. MPCA is optimistic that funding will continue to be available. Currently, MPCA is involved in the State Clean Water Partnership Program. This program will provide 3.5-2 2/90 matching funds for lake improvement projects and non -point source pollution abatement. B. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) The MDNR has available funding through its Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance Program. The program provides financial support for planning and implementing structural and non-structural flood damage reduction measures. The program includes 50/50 matching funds through either a general fund or from a bonded fund. C. Minnesota State Board of Water and Soil Resources (MSBWSR) MSBWSR has limited matching funds available for erosion control projects. Table 3.4 illustrates the advantages and disadvantages of the different financing methods. 3.5 - 3 a Ym •Ito/Laid ucvvl olilvonl Ua_r Ch.r e__. _ �d valuree Tta ___ 1eclal llraer wenl�_I'ee!and Land Yaectl°n__ 9= RAvanlage! r 1. Reduce coot burden 1. Kopartlar caesloq v la redda.ls o1 the 1. Rdalnl.ltallve 1. On1Y benefited 1. Na ar.11, a..(( Pay- ...trlbuting to the cowavlty. structure for prope.tl.. Pay for runoff .an.gseent• need /er runoff collection In plot.. ....Solvent Pay. 7. SLPIa enJ acceplvd 7. sevanuea 6w 7. Rdrin.vlstruplane 7 P oportlo.ed. Change Is r to ru ly anesu-Off /or revl..Ing evin9 p enen fed by speelfle •aura o/ rvvenue, enf sea col letting tee. 1. In 9 applied 1. a el... Properties. .Pacific [.,.Joel place. coot. Nu ca.pa tl- ]. Sell-Ilesoelnq Soles lion vlth q-0-1-1 not In ecepetltIw aIth nrvlee-. yenecal services [undo. 1. .Iles. for .layer ]. Snout. directly ]. flat..:... be uiLldred revenue baaa. ..Iliad to cost for to lM1e Po s, [ J.11n9 and nav u.vice. thmv9h r.,ul.my daveloP.Ats both Pay change.. s. M.ea went ran ba 7. Revenues are applied to 5. Tla.IbllltY In the a. Through to- . elw. district- cantll- deterred In hardship .star "e.g. Na Y baton V.Y• Co.... ceepetitle. Ith general service.. 6. revenues. .ourca of revenues. T. Specific dedicated Iund /or ..else. alter wnagewnt. 8. sdelnl-t utlse structure for Rolbelle. 01re.41 lu ],Co.V D�..aa.mye. 1. No Incentive to 1. Rigid procedural 1. only addresses prabl... 1. We 101 setteal Born In 1. of revenue. source ,ad... foleff ar regale Den l&, theAne fd..he lop..-tcinity o[ d....1. led a! case of .venue. the new dsvalopwnt, not /.real- and pAllesepM1T• pollution. usually Relating dev.loPen tr. 7. Mn ..tell oneb11 to I revel Of benefit - received. Pro- 7. may regain an 7. frees... ad.lnts- 1. Runoff eonnlbutor. 7. Only addfRes P p festive coal& for caomt Le anened, of..Jc not ble...tlon a t ructura. d.lnlacative securing and o! ufac problsee• "raging file !vide. ]. Dlnconllnuou- ]. Difficult to deter- ]. flnantlnq eful.....as a oaurce cal revenue. line and ".v. ° ,hibenefit. a. Lldutlun. .11 May PI¢v w unfair amount o! ..Pend• burden on .... (lure. due to ..,.onto of it -- budget constraints. population. 5. Co.petlllen aIth other city Scavlcvo (I.... Pullce, flwl ]. "Olt often geanl- equlrs cost sharing Red thus additional funding source. This results In doubt ad.lnl.l atlas cost• due to sevacal funding sources. I, Ll.lted avallabilllY Do an Lregui.r schadule. 5. Requite. con.ld- srable lead if.. feel application to receiving !undo. TABLE 3.4 ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES FI DIFFERENT RUNOFF MANAGEMENT FINANCING ME 6/91 Table 3.5 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SUBWATERSHED DESIGNATION PRIORITY CORRECTIVE ACTION AA-5 High Long Lake Road storm sewer from Ardan Avenue North to dis- charge location at New Highway 10. AA-6 Low Feasibility Report twet- regarding optimal land management and function of the area located at Ardan Avenue and New Highway 10. The report should include a cost estimate, required sediment pond size, outlet structure modifications, land acquisition needs, address method of spreading flow uniformly across wetland and recre- ational benefits. AA -I Future Remove Sediment from (F) north wetland located in Ardan Fark. AA-2 Future Sherwood Road trunk (F) storm sewer. AA-3 Future New outlet pipe from the wetland to a storm sewer on the west side of Groveland Park- AA-4 Future Upon completion of the Ardan Avenue trunk storm sewer, replace the existing outlet structure located north of Red Oak Court. The new outlet should be designed for minimum maintenance. AA-5 Future Ardan Avenue trunk storm sewer. 3.2 - 3 3/g2 Table 3.5 (Cont.) SUgNATERSHED PRS ORITY CORRECTIVE ACTION DES'Gf� Feasibility Report GF_4 Low regarding optimal wet- land management and function of the area located at Greenfield and Hillview Road. Avenue The report shouldinclude a cost estimate, required sediment pond outlet structure modifications, land acquisition neecs, address method of uniformly spreading un across wetland and recre- ational benefits. Low Improve outlet under GF-+ Hillview Road to eliminate grouted Outlet config- rip -rap. uration should be identified in Feasibility Study listed above. GF-.. Future Outlet modification at to reduce flow wetland to Judicial Ditch �1• Construct sediment GF-4 Future basin and necessary inlet appurtenances at Edgewood pipe from Drive. GF-5 Future Ditch improvement from GF-3 outlet culvert under New Highway 10 to Judicial Ditch #1. GF-5 Future Replace existing CMP culvert east of Lois Drive and Knoll Drive with an Culvert convey, Judicial -. 41 under Lois Drive. 3/92 SUBWATERSHED DESIGNATION GF-o 35W-3 EW-1 EW-7 EW-8 EW-8 EW-10 Table 3.5 (Cont.) PRIORITY CORRECTIVE ACTION Future Ditch improvement on reach draining into Judicial Ditch No. 1 between Lois Drive and Hillview Road. Future Sediment Removal High Feasibility study on optimal wetland manage- ment and function of the wetland located between Old Highway 10 and Silver Lake Road north of County Road I. Cost of con- struction can be born by the developer of the site. High New outlet pipe from wetland to Long Lake Road storm sewer system. High Construction of a water quality improve- ment wetland at Long Lake Road and Ridge Lane. The basin was initially proposed in SEH report "Edgewood District Drainage Plan" (1988). Feasibility and Construction Plans and Specifications under SEH Job r89271. High Trunk storm sewer from Silverview Pond to Long Lake Road and County Road H2 (part of Long Lake Road storm sewer). High Trunk storm sewer from Long Lake Road and Ridge Lane to Woodcrest Drive and Irondale Road (part of Long Lake Road storm sewer). 3.2 - 5 3/92 Table 3.5 (Cont.) SWBWATERSHED PRIORITY CORRECTIVE ACTION DESIGN_A10 to Feasibility suoE EW-6 Low deten- determine type tion area and land acquisition needs. Detention area is Old located between Highway 10 and Bronson Edgewood Drive east of Drive. Multi -purpose detention area proposed "Edgewood in SEH study District Drainage Dian" (1988). Ew-3 Future 15-inch outlet pipe the wetland to be from built with reconstruction of County Road H2, EW-4 Future Feasibility study and construction of sedi- ment pond at west end of Silverview Pond. Future Sediment removal at EW-q west leg of Silverview Pond. Future Construct detention EW-6 pond between Bronson 1C Drive and old Highway east of EdgewoodDrive. EW-8 Future Trunk storm sewer from EW-6 (Old Highwayo 10 and County Road H2) EW-8 (Long Lake Road and Road 142). (May be County part of County Road 112 storm sewer or as proposed "Edge - in 1988 SEH report wood District Drainage Plan.") 3.2 - 6 3/92 Table 3.5 (Cont.) SUBWATERSHED DESIGNATION PRIORITY CORRECTIVE ACTION EW-9 Future Repair, modify, and/ or replace wetland outlet located near Woodcrest Drive and Ironwood Road. EW-10 Future Storm sewer from Clearview Avenue and Edgewood Drive to Clearview Avenue and Irondale Road. The storm sewer is required only if the County Road H2 storm sewer is constructed from Old Highway 10 to Long Lake Road. SC-2 Low Feasibility report regarding optimal wet- land management and function of the area located east of Woodcrest Drive and Silver Lake Road. The report should include a cost estimate, required sediment pond size, outlet structure modifications, land acquisition needs, address method of spreading flow uniformly across wetland and recre- ational benefits. SC-4 Low Feasibility report on a sediment pond located south of Woodlake Drive between Pleasant View Drive and Knollwood Road. The report should include: a cost estimate, required sediment pond size, outlet structure configura- tion, and land acquisition needs. 3.2 - , 2;90 Table 3.5 (Cont.) SUBWATERSHED PRIORITY CORRECTIVE ACTION DESIGNATION Future Outlet from wetland to SC any future Silver Lake Road storm sewer. SC-2 Future Construction of a sediment pond and appurtenances north of Woodcrest Park. Future Future Storm sewer from SC-2 Drive, dcrest k through the proposed sedi- to ment pond on north ment side of park. existing 24" SC-3 Future Replace CMp with twin 36" RCPs and install a special outlet structure. Outlet structure is to be designed to hold bo� 100-year designsto all existing rate and pass other larger events. SC-4 Future Construction of a sediment pond south Of Woodlake Drive between Pleasant View Drive and Knollwood Road. NW-1 Future Park onCity a ofsspri geLake drainage project for Park Square locatednorwesth oof Highway 10 Pleasant View Drive. 29, 1987. Agreement dated June F�McM Future Update 1981 Flood Study. Insurance Update 3.2 - 6 3/92 Table 3.5 (Cont.) SUHWATERSHED DESIGNATION PRIORITY CORRECTIVE ACTION Plan Detailed review of Amendments local plan one year after approval. For the plan to be useful, it must change with the changing needs of the City. Amendments need not all be madF at once. But desired plan amendments should be regularly recorded so that the appropriate plan changes can be made in an efficient manner. City Prepare handout guide - Administration lines for developers to use to meet the plan standards. Establish storm water utility, including public information program, administration, etc. For overall maintenance, street sweeping, financing. Semi -Annual Inspections of each Inspections City wetland area twice a year (major areas after every rainfall). Results of inspections are tabu- lated and a punch list for public works is formulated. 3.2- 9 3/92 SUBWATERSHED DESIGNATION Permitting Ordinances Review Table 3.5 (Cont.) PRIORITY CORRECTIVE ACTION Develop permitting format. Review plans and development against plan standards. Working with developers to meet the goals and policies of the City. Fee should be developed to defray costs. Suggested Modifications Review and modify after one year of local plan approval. Routine review approval. 3.2 - 10 6/91 4.3 MAINTENANCE GUIDE Mounds View, Minnesota Management Program for Maintenance Guide Revised December 1989 Information for: City Engineer Maintenance Personnel PRACTICE: Bi-annual inspection of all wetland areas and ditches. MINIMUM STANDARD: Brief walking inspection to record sediment buildup, skimmer and structure conditions, litter, vegetation, and visual water quality. PRACTICE: Street Sweeping MINIMUM STANDARD: Semi-annually, following snowmelt and in fall after leaves have fallen. PRACTICE: Catch Basin Cleaning. MINIMUM STANDARD: Frequency to prevent encroachment of sediment and debris above flow line of pipe. PRACTICE: Inspection of Direct Storm Sewer Discharge Points to protected wetlands or waterbodies MINIMUM STANDARD: Inspection on bi-annual basis and following large storm events to determine if discharge point is free from sediment and to observe the condition of any treatment facility if applicable. PRACTICE: Removal of Sediment. MINIMUM STANDARD: Based on bi-annual inspections, sediment shall be removed from areas where the sediment impedes the flow path, from areas not designated for sediment 4.3 - 1 2/90 removal, or where sediment build up has eliminated necessary storage volume. PRACTICE: Structure and Skimmer Maintenance. MINIMUM STANDARD: Based on bi-annual inspections and following heavy rains, maintenance needs should be developed. PRACTICE: Litter Control. MINIMUM STANDARD: Bi-annual wetland inspections and collection. Seasonal public education efforts. PRACTICE: Chemical application to reduce aquatic and roadside vegetation. MINIMUM STANDARD: Discourage this practice to the greatest extent possible. PRACTICE: Vegetation Harvesting. MINIMUM STANDARD: In areas specially developed and maintained to control and reduce nutrients, vegetation should be harvested in the late summer of each year. Storm water should then be diverted from the treatment area until vegetation can be reestablished. PRACTICE: Storm Sewer and Culvert Flushing. MINIMUM STANDARD: Monthly visual checks of pipes that have a history of sedimentation problems. Flushing performed on an as needed basis. 4.3 - 2 11 � •" M-1 . Y o r t II r n D r• I ' D � !' ;' a / � •mac— � x _. , _: t a .. ,S f.M-11 eRN-0 BVP-0 N V..__... �]IIlk • as.l I J L - PC-] N[ W B R I G H T O N DRAINAGE PLAN - 7 CO T > m LEGEND IJ t0n �o n<-i• c MINOR WATERSHED BOUNDARY SUB —WATERSHED BOUNDARY m AA-1 SUB —WATERSHED DESIGNATION D o V— DITCHES O z � WETLANDS OUTFLOW DIRECTION D" � LAKES/OPEN WATER —>— EXISTING MAJOR TRUNK m STORM SEWER PROPOSED MAJOR TRUNK D I jl'OPM SEWER z FIGURE NC. 2 2 JANUARY 1990 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL n� FROM: SAMANTHA ORDUNO, CITY ADMI AT R DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1993 RE: INDEX FOR WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 - COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 13 1993 Regular Council Meeting - Monday, September 13, 1993 - 7:00 P.M. ITEMS PROVIDED IN THIS WEEK'S COUNCIL PACKET This Is It! Agenda Unapproved Minutes, August 25, 1993, Canvassing Board Meeting Unapproved Minutes, August 23, 1993, Regular Council Meeting Approved Minutes ++++++++++++++++++ ADMINISTRATOR'S SCHEDULE (Please note that this schedule is subject to change as meetings are scheduled, rescheduled or canceled. At any time andraynumberele 'whererITim cancbewill reachedeatyallstimesr)nt schedule Monday, September 13 Meeting with Architects 10:00 a.m. NOON Managers Luncheon 7:00 p.m. Regular Council Meeting Tuesday September 14 9:00 a.m. Pipeline Safety Meeting 1:00 P.M. Department Head Meeting 7:00 p.m. Town's Edge Board Meeting MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE TWO SEPTEMBER 8, 1993 Wednesday September 15 NOON Luncheon with Bob Long 2:00 - 10:00 P.M. FOCUS Meetings Thursday September 16 10:00 a.m. - 1:30 p.m. Fire Department Meeting Friday September 17 b:\index.913