HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1993/12/06 ECEMBE; : 1:99: ::
Q.
COUNCIL WORK SESSION .
1. Discussion with Representative Geri Evans Regarding 1994 Legislative
Priorities (Samantha Orduno) •
2. Chris Graham - Brooklyn Park Housing Department (Mary Saarion)
3. Discussion on 1994 Budget (Don Brager)
. Enterprise Funds
AGENDA
PAGE TWO
DECEMBER 6, 1993
4. 1993 Budget Adjustments - (Samantha Orduno) - Info to be provided Monday
evening.
5. 1994 Schedule of Fees and Charges - (Samantha Orduno)
6. Update on Golf Course Bond Sale - (Samantha Orduno)
7. Discussion Regarding Delinquent Accounts Receivable (Samantha Orduno)
8. Update on the November 1, 1993 Discussions with Ramsey County
Commissioner Wedell (Mary Saarion, Mike Ulrich and Paul Harrington)
Relocation of Compost Site
Preliminary Estimate on City Plowing/Sweeping County Roads
Realignment of Old 8 and County Road H
AGENDA
PAGE THREE
DECEMBER 6, 1993
9. Discussion Regarding Contract for Animal Control (Tim Ramacher)
10. Recommendation from Park and Recreation Commission Regarding Park
Dedication Fees for Everest's Proposed Bldgs. M and N (Mary Saarion)
(Information to be provided Monday evening.)
11. Purchase of Engine Analyzer (Mike Ulrich)
12. Consideration of Establishment of a Petty Cash Fund (Don Brager)
AGENDA
PAGE FOUR
DECEMBER 6, 1993
13. Discussion of Greenfield Ponds Development Agreement (Paul Harrington)
14. Discussion of Off-Street Parking Plan for Robert's Off 10 (Paul Harrington)
15. Discussion of Request for Rezoning and Development Review, Multi-Tech/Everest
(Paul Harrington)
16. Discussion of Planning Commission Recommendation Regarding Car Lots (Paul
Harrington)
17. Review of Snow and Ice Control Policy (Mike Ulrich)
•
AGENDA
PAGE FIVE
DECEMBER 6, 1993
18. Council/Staff Expectations (per Councilmember Quick)
CURDS
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 1.
Report Number: 9 3-69 3WS
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA SESSION DATE
ir
� u° December 6, 1993 Report Date: 12-1-93
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Discussion with Representative Geri Evans Regarding 1994 Priorities
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
Representative Geri Evans will be present at the December 6, 1993 Work
Session to discuss the Council's Legislative Issues which were formulated
at the November 1, 1993 Work Session.
Attached please find the letter that was sent to Representative Evans which
summarized the list of issues and concerns discussed at the last Work
Session,...-
3-014 , f, ,,,e6,
Saman a Ordun , City Adminis ator
,,Q_
RECOMMENDATION;
November 29, 1993
The Honorable Geri Evans
State Office Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Dear Representative Geri Evans;
The purpose of this letter is to confirm your attendance at the
Mounds View City Council's December 6, 1993 Work Session and to
thank you for taking the time to meet with the Council and Staff to
discuss the issues of concern to the City of Mounds View.
At the Council's November 1, 1993 Work Session, the Council
developed a list of legislative priorities which they consider to
be important for Mounds View in the 1994 Legislative Session. The
list includes the following issues:
* Increasing the filing fee and requirements for elective office
* Limitations on the DNR permits to remove water from area lakes
* Amendment of the Human Rights Law to provide law enforcement
officers more discretionary authority over lawful stops.
* Amendment to the MSA allotment procedures which currently
require cities to construct roadways according to standards
which may not be appropriate to a particular city and also
allow cities to spend MSA money on any road in the city.
* Additional restrictions on agricultural peddlers in a city.. --
Several of these peddlers pose many problems for the City,
yet we are not permitted to establish fees to offset the
cost of enforcement of our laws.
* Improved coordination of responsibilities regarding inspections
of manufactured home parks.
* Repeal of the State imposed sales tax on cities
* A realistic, reasonable and truly informative Truth In Taxation
Law which recognizes the budgetary process of cities and does
not present misleading information to residents many months
before a city's budget is completed.
Mk
REPRESENTATIVE GERI EVANS
PAGE TWO
NOVEMBER 29, 1993
* Restructuring of the property tax formula - residential
properties are absorbing more of the tax burden due to the
tax shift from C/I properties. Also, there needs to be an
reviewal of County assessment practices. Values are often not
consistent within and across city boundaries; and, to
frequently, the values established are too high for a property
owner to absorb in a one year cycle.
* Clarification of the restrictions on employee use of city-owned
vehicles
* No reopener of Pay Equity
* Define timeline and funding for the turnback of County roads to
municipalities
* Examination of Minnesota cities liabilities under the Super
Fund law and related state statutes. Cities need help from
the potentially devastating results of landfill litigations.
* Restructuring of the Tax Increment Law to remove restrictions
which are hindering cities' ability to attract and retain
an industrial/commercial base.
* A commitment, through legislative action, which places no
additional
unfunded mandates on cities and examine the need for current
mandates with a goal of removal of some mandates by the next
legislative session.
* Establishment of qualifications for all charter commission
members as well as a better system for appointments.
* Stricter State Nuisance Ordinance and opportunities for cities
to establish stricter code enforcement procedures.
As you can see, the City Council is very interested in discussing
ideas which address a comprehensive and important spectrum of
social and political issues. The City of Mounds View is confident
that by establishing an open and on-going dialogue with our elected
officials and sharing with them the City's concerns, the City of
Mounds View will be an-important- instrument for-positive change--in- ---
the Metropolitan area.
It is always a pleasure to see you and we all look forward to our
meeting with you on December 6, 1993 , 7 :00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of the Mounds View City Hall.
Sincerely,
Samantha Orduno
City Administrator
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 2
OUND�
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 93-694WS
Ilf
Y Re ort Date: 12-1-93
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 p
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Chris Graham - Brooklyn Park Housing Department
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
At an earlier Work Session meeting the Council expressed interest
in learning more about the work that Brooklyn Park has done with
screening rental tenants in their city. At the Council's request
I called Brooklyn Park for more information and was introduced to
Chris Graham, Housing Director. She is a wealth of information
and felt that the appropriate group to share information with is
the City Council. Without hesitation she agreed to come to this
work session to share her information and answer any questions
that the Council may have regarding this issue.
Chris Graham has been the driving force in coordinating a
property managers group that meets on a monthly basis. The
meetings include networking and getting to know each other as
well as guest speakers who offer information such as third party
screening, setting standards for people to abide by, screening
advantages, and how to go about obtaining references on potential
tenants, school district information, parks information and other
information that would be conducive to rental agencies in their
business of selling rental space.
Chris has great interest in this project_ ShP has been working
with the property managers in the City of Brooklyn Park for
approximately 5 years and has seen many other cities follow suit.
Her dream is to form a Metro Area property managers group. Chris
has spoken with many city councils in the metropolitan area and
sees the work session as a great opportunity to meet with the
Mounds View City Council.
- .1-~-10')
Mary Saarion,iirector of Parks, Recreation and Forestry
RECOMMENDATION;
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 2.
J,,;;✓� Report Number: 93-694WS
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993
Report Date: 12-1-93
1
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Chris Graham — Brooklyn Park Housing Department
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY:
At an earlier Work Session meeting the Council expressed interest
in learning more about the work that Brooklyn Park has done with
screening rental tenants in their city. At the Council ' s request
I called Brooklyn Park for more information and was introduced to
Chris Graham, Housing Director. She is a wealth of information
and felt that the appropriate group to share information with is
the City Council. Without hesitation she agreed to come to this
work session to share her information and answer any questions
that the Council may have regarding this issue.
Chris Graham has been the driving force in coordinating a
property managers group that meets on a monthly basis. The
meetings include networking and getting to know each other as
well as guest speakers who offer information such as third party
screening, setting standards for people to abide by, screening
advantages, and how to go about obtaining references on potential
tenants, school district information, parks information and other
information that would be conducive to rental agencies in their
business of selling rental space.
Chris has great interest in this project. She has been working
with the property managers in the City of Brooklyn Park for
approximately 5 years and has seen many other cities follow suit.
Her dream is to form a Metro Area property managers group. Chris
has spoken with many city councils in the metropolitan area and
sees the work session as a great opportunity to meet with the
Mounds View City Council.
. Mary Saarionector of Parks, Recreation and Forestry
RECOMMENDATION;
HAND CARRIED TO DECEMBER 6, 1993 AGENDA SESSION
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section:
051DD
STAFF REPORT Report Number:
CEW DECEMBER 6, 1903 Report Date: 12/06/93
AGENDA SESSION DATE
DISPOSITION
Item Description: 1993 BUDGET ROLLOVERS
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
At the end of 1992 when the 1993 Budget was adopted, the City had not yet
finalized plans to remodel and expand the City Hall building. Because of
the uncertainty regarding any possible expansion plans, staff included
several City Hall capital equipment items in the Long Term financial Plan
and the 1993 Budget which would now be more prudent to purchase in 1994 in
conjunction with the expansion. The items include:
$ 2, 500 Tables and Chairs for Lower Level Kitchen
3, 000 Folding Chairs
2, 000 Lateral Files
2, 000 Office Equipment
1, 000 Table
17 , 600 Audio Visual
$ 28, 100
* The total project cost includes the $12 , 600 budgeted in 1993 and the
$5, 000 grant from the Cable Commission. The total amount would need
to be "rolled over" into 1994 Central Services (formally called City
Hall) capital 100-4190-703 .
It is unusual that the need-exists- to- roll over-into the--next--year somany
items from the previous year- However, the City Hall project represents an
unusual circumstance. Staff was asked to critically assess all capital
expenditures to determine the benefits of delayed purchases in coordination
with the expansion project and the eventual reallocation of space and
equipment needs.
It must be noted that the roll over amounts will lessen the monies
available for any end-of-the-year deficits.
Staff is requesting that the total amount stated above be "rolled over"
into the 1994 for Central Services capital expenditures.
Sam ltha Orduno, City Administ ator
NOV 29 '93 13:12 P.1
i
11
1 k
s 40 C> 17> LI -r C> S.
• Sports Event Development • Marketing - Production
WCN SPORTS lawn;
Mary Sarian • • . - July .14, 19.93,
TO:
City of Mounds View Park & Rec ' Page 1 of 1
FROM: Mike Wal ten •
'WCN Sports Nets , •
RE: Quote for Ballfield Barrier Netting
Joh Descripr-im: To provide and 'install baseball barrier netting 20' high and
11.8' 7" long to be.erected ontm of a pre-existing,. 15' high.chain link fence
bacidstop.
Materials: - #36 or #21 nylon knotted netting, weather-treated (black),
- (4) 42' western red'cedar poles ('class 5)
• - 260' of 1/4" galvanized:steel aircraft' cable'for top & bottom
cabling .
- Installation hardware; zinc interlocking spring 'clips;
turnbuckles; galvanized steel eye bolts; wire' rope clips
Materials Cost using #21 niAt Using #36 Net
$2,527.70 ' $2,689.70
+ 6.5% MN Sales Tax 164.30 174.83
Shipping (Net) 48.00 57.00
Labor Cost for Pole, Setting,
Project Management and . . •
• Pole Delivery: ____22.1.00 975-00
Total Estimate: $3,715.00 $3,896.53 .
• . • . . •
Payment Terms: C.O.D. - Payment is dUe 14=nthe-Completion of the barrier
net-installation. •
**mum Pole setting portion of estimate is based onthe anticipation of.no
Significant underground.impediments to augering t1 ' pole holes_ If rock or
other impediments to digging are encountered, any additional augering or,
excavation time required and performed.by WCN Sports Nets -will be billed to the
City of Mounds View at .therate of $100 per hour.
Labor portion of estimatwis based on the City of Mounds View
providing a'lift or aerial bucket adequate for the job, a lift operator and at.
least one other worker to work withMike Walston of WCN Nets = the Cabling •and
net installation portion of the job. •,
• • • •
•
-15333 Trillium Circle • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 • (612) 934-3545 Fax (612) 934.3545
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 4
1111TS
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 93-1003WS
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 ; Report Date: 12-2-93
V
DISPOSITION
Item Description: 1993 Budget Adjustments
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
'
- No comments to supplement this report 4
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
'SUMMARY;
The Parks, Recreation & Forestry Department is requesting Council
approval to carry over three items budgeted in the 1993 to the
1994 budget. The first is $3 , 300 which has been received from
the DNR as a grant for planting large trees. This money cannot
be used this year because the planting season is over. However,
if carried over to the 1994 budget trees can be purchased and
planted in the Spring of 1994 .
Secondly, $1,500 was unspent in the Recreation Fund because the I
did not attend the National Conference due to time and scheduling
conflicts. However, I would like to carry that money over to
1994 with the intention of purchasing new furniture that the
department is sure to need after the move. A printer table,
shelving, children's table and chairs and two customer chairs are
needed as well as a credenza. Also, the Program Supervisor's
desk and the desk shared by the Forester, our future intern Brad
and April, our school/work student are old, old desks that had
been purchased many years ago from the Army Surplus shop should
be replaced - - with desks that have drawers that actually close
and open without a struggle! The money would be well spent on
much needed furniture.
These two requests for carry-over are from the general fund. My
third request is for carry-over in the Recreation Activity Fund.
Please refer to the separate memo.
Mary Saa io• irector of Parks, Recreation and Forestry
RECOMMENDATION:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 4'
111TOS Report Number: 93-1003WS
STAFF REPORT
�w° AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 Report Date: 12-2-93
DISPOSITION
Item Description: 1993 Budget Adjustments
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
Budgeted for 1993 were a couple of projects that did not get completed
for various reasons. The first one is restoration of the turf area
around the new water tower. This project was not completed because a
new ballfield was constructed and the City Hall expansion was expected
to begin in the early fall. Funds designated for this project, $7, 000,
were for irrigation around the tower and new ballfield.
Another project that was postponed was the construction of material
storage bins inside the Public Works garage area. This was delayed
because of a manpower shortage and the late date in which the remaining
surface in that area was paved.
Staff is requesting that $6, 400 for the material storage bins (account
#100-4270-703) and $7, 000 for the irrigation system (account #700-4121-
703) be transferred to the 1994 Budget.
"7/
Mike Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor
RECOMMENDATION;
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section:
4.
O�UNDS 93-1003WS
STAFF REPORT Report Number:
EWReport Date: 12-2-93
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993
DISPOSITION
Item Description: 1993 Budget Adjustments
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
ISUMMARY;
The Police Department has monies from the 1993 budget that we are
requesting be transferred to the 1994 budget. The requests are as
follows:
1. $4, 000 (Account No.4200-703) to be transferred to the
same 1994 account. This amount was saved because
computer cost less than budgeted and no monies were
spent for office equipment. I would like to spent this
money in the remodeling project.
2. $1, 000 (Account No. 4200-362 to be transferred to 1994
(Account No. 4200-513) . This amount was saved by not going to
the National Chief's Conference. I would like to spend this
money to repair and paint a squad car (1989 Blazer) .
3 . $4, 000 that was donated by Lion' Club to purchase
MDT's. The MDT was not installed because of the
remodeling project.
Tim Ramacher, Police Chief
RECOMMENDATION;
- = 4.
OUND
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section:
Report Number: 93-1003WS
STAFF REPORT
ir
��nun AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 Report Date: 12-2-93
ti
DISPOSITION
Item Description: 1993 Budget Adjustments
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY:
This item will involve a request by City Staff to roll over into the 1994
Budget funds from the 1993 Budget that, for several reasons, are considered
more cost-efficient and prudent to expend in conjunction with the City Hall
expansion and other activities. This is more of a "housekeeping" item, one
that is consistent with past practices. Specifics of the request will be
provided at the meeting Monday night.
(1----
Samant' a Orduno t intra r sc�
RECOMMENDATION;
Mk
•
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section:
4.
Report Number: 93-1003WS
STAFF REPORT
EVrn p 12-2-93
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 Report Date:
DISPOSITION
•
Item Description:
1993 Budget Adjustments
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
Staff is recommending the carry-over of Recreation Activity Funds
for the purchase and installation of netting for Greenfield Park
baseball field. Last summer, 1993 Mike Walston met with Steve
Dazenski, Mary Johnson and me regarding the problems of foul
balls during baseball play at Greenfield Park. Mike worked out a
netting scheme that would include the installation of 4 42 ' red
cedar poles (class 5) and 260 ' of galvanized steel aircraft cable
and netting. The netting would be attached with clips that could
be removed during winter months if desired.
Although the netting may not catch every foul ball, it would
provide a catch for those balls that go directing up and over, up
to the 20 ' over and above the 16 ' high backstop. It is
predicted that 80-90% of the foul balls would be stopped.
Even though this may not be a foolproof remedy for all the foul
balls that occur at Greenfield Park, I do believe that it is a
good faith effort on the part of the City of Mounds View to do
everything possible to try to remedy the problem of foul balls
going into the backyards of residents abutting Greenfield Park.
To approve the use of 1993 Recreation
Activity Funds to carry over to 1994 for the
purpose of purchasing and installing a
netting system at Greenfield Park baseball
field, not to exceed $4,500.
Aei
LAI AfIrY /4". 1
Mary Saar oil, --'""P—or of Parks, Recreation and Forestry
RECOMMENDATION;
11
EMUREQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 5
Report Number: 9 3—6 9 5W S
STAFF REPORT
0��'° AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 Report Date: 12-6-93
DISPOSITION
Item Description: 1994 Schedule of Fees and Charges
Administrator's Review/Recommendation: t"'
- No comments to supplement this report 4'
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
In the past, the resolution establishing the license/permit/fee schedule
has been updated periodically, as needed. Often times, the revision is in
reaction to legislative or City policy changes.
The last time the resolution was updated and approved by the Council was
May 26, 1992 .
In an effort to better coordinate the Schedule with the budget process,
resolutions setting water, sewer, street light and surface water management
rates, Staff is recommending that the resolution establishing the
License/Permit/Fee Schedule be approved prior to the end of each year - in
this case, at the December 13th Council meeting.
The staff has been examining the current license/permit/fee schedule and
has made recommendations for revisions which are consistent with costs and
are also comparable with Metropolitan cities. The Police Department has
recommended changes to the Administrative Offense schedule which are more
consistent with Ramsey County charges.
The recommended changes are underlined on the attached Proposed Schedule.
7.71,-4)-7- io..../ 01110,---4.d:64,,,
Sa .ntha Or. no, Ci y Administrator
RECOMMENDATION:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section:
CMO
STAFF REPORT Report Number:
��W
AGENDA SESSION DATE Report Date:
DISPOSITION
Item Description:
Mounds View fee schedule changes
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY:
Restoration Fee
A fee increase is requested for the restoration charge of a water service. This fee is currently $50.00
which covers the labor for locating the resident's water curb box, shutting off the water and turning
it back on. The current amount does not include any administrative costs which include (3) mailing
notices (2 of which are certified), book keeping expenses and many times an officer is sent to the
house to try and deliver a certified letter that was not accepted by normal mail delivery. The proposed
increase is $15.00, making the restoration charge $65.00.
Street Opening Permits
Staff is requesting/recommending that the City repair all street openings. In the past, utility
contractors would estimate the size of an opening and the permit was issued accordingly. A few
instances have occurred when the patch is not constructed properly and the City crews, in the end,
make additional repairs to the patch, several months later, with no compensation. (This is due to
settling, cracking, holding water, etc..) Staff is recommending that the City charge $500.00 to $700.00
to repair the street opening and refund the remaining balance to the contractor. The cost of the repair
will include asphalt, labor, equipment costs and an administrative charge.- A typical-water/sewer
opening would cost approximatcly $350.00. (3 man crew at $23.56 per hour each for 1 hour = $70.68
plus $100.00 for equipment, plus approximately $20.00 per ton for asphalt which covers 4 inch thick,
7 1/2 foot square patch, plus $100.00 administrative charge.) This will ensure a proper repair of the
road and greatly minimize future repairs of the same street opening.
Only in circumstances when multiple openings occur and an inspector is present during the backfilling
and base proportion, will a contractor be allowed to construct installation of the bituminous surface.
,1 e''' ‘j'el —'
Michael Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor
RECOMMENDATION:
,
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION jJ Agenda Section: S
Report Number: 93-695WS
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA SESSION DATE
December 6, 1993 Report Date: 12-6-93
DISPOSITION
Item Description: 1994 Schedule of Fees and Charges
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
In the past, the resolution establishing the license/permit/fee schedule
has been updated periodically, as needed. Often times, the revision is in
reaction to legislative or City policy changes.
The last time the resolution was updated and approved by the Council was
May 26, 1992 .
In an effort to better coordinate the Schedule with the budget process,
resolutions setting water, sewer, street light and surface water management
rates, Staff is recommending that the resolution establishing the
License/Permit/Fee Schedule be approved prior to the end of each year - in
this case, at the December 13th Council meeting.
The staff has been examining the current license/permit/fee schedule and
has made recommendations for revisions which are consistent with costs and
are also comparable with Metropolitan cities. The Police Department has
recommended changes to the Administrative Offense schedule which are more
consistent with Ramsey County charges.
The recommended changes are underlined on the attached Proposed Schedule.
(C;27,/-764,4,<Q___,
Sa ntha Or• no, City Administrator
RECOMMENDATION;
CITY OF
MOUNDS VIEW
PROPOSED
1994
FEE SCHEDULE
Last Revision 5/26/92
Accessory Building 102
Accident Report 79
Addition (First Floor) 102
Addition (Mobile Home) 102
Administrative Offense 101
Agendas 74
Air Conditioning 18
Air Conditioning 102
Amusement Center 67
Amusement Device 67
Amusement Rides 69
Apartment List 110
Apartment Registration 50
Asphalt 3
Assessment Search 72
Attached Garage 102
Basement (Semi-Finished) 102
Basement (Unfinished) 102
Basic Floor Area 102
Billboards 19
Blue Prints 81
Bowling Alley 68
Boxing Permit 71
Buildings 1
Business List, Mounds View 111
Carnivals 69
Carport 102
Circuses 69
City Code Book 77
City Hall Shelter Rental 85
Code Appeal 33
Code Book 77
Community Room Rental 83
Comprehensive Land Use Plan 77
Comprehensive Land Use
Plan Amendment 108
Conditional Use Permit 32
Contractor Licenses 28
Contractor (State)
License Verification 106
Copies 73
Council Meeting Packets 76
Crawl Space 102
Curb Stop Shut Off 45
Deck 102
Detached Garage 102
Development Plan Review 34
Dog Licenses 48
Door and Window Installation 9
Driveway 3
Duct work 20
Electrical Work 89
Elevators 23
Excavating 2
Fans - 20
Fence 8
Filing Fee for City Office 78
Filling 2
Fire Sprinkling Permit 16
Fireplace 102
Footings 1
Furnace 20
Garbage Enclosure 10
Garbage Hauler 61
Garage 102
Gas Piping 16
Gasoline Station 62
Grading 2
Half Way House 66
Heating 20
House Permit 102
Hydrant 94
Incinerators 22
Insufficient Funds Check 92
Intoxicating Liquor 51 -56
Investigation Fee 56, 64, 106
Kennel License 49
Lakeside Park Rental 84
Late Water Bill (penalty) 43
License Verification
(Contractor) 106
Liquor License 51 -60
Load Limits 47
Major Subdivision 36
Maps 81
Meter Reading Card
(Non-Return) 42
Meter Testing 103
Minor Subdivision 35
Minutes 75
Mobile Home Permit 29
Mobile Homes 24
Moving Buildings 14, 15
Multiple Dwelling List 110
Multiple Dwelling Registration 50
New Car Sales 63
New Resident List 82
Non-Intoxicating Liquor 57-60
Notary Public 80
NSF Check 92
Office Filing Fee 78
Open Carport 102
Park Dedication Fee 97
Park Shelter Building 84, 85
- -- Parking Lot 3_
Patio 3
Peddlers License & ID 64
Photocopies 73
Picnic Kit 104
Picnic Shelter 85
Pipe Fitting 16
Plan Check Fee 91
Plan Review 34
Planned Unit Development/
Amendment 107
Planning Sign Deposit 96
Platforms 7
Plumbing 17
Police 79
Porch 102
PUD Development/Amendment 107
Raising 13
Recreational Structures 102
Recuperation House 66
Refrigeration 18
Relocation of Building 37
Remodeling 102
Reroof 5
Reshingling 5
Residing 6
Restaurant License 65
Restoration Fee 44
Returned Check 92
Rezoning 30
Road Restriction Permit 47
Rubbish Hauler 61
S.A.C. arge 86
Sales Tax 93
Satellite Dishes 25
Seating 7
Service Restoration 44
Sewer Availability
Charge (SAC) 86
Sewer Rate 99
Sewer Connection Permit 46
Shed 102
Sheet Metal 21
Shoring 13
Shut Off Fee 45
Sidewalks 3
Sign Code, Copy_ _ 77
Signs 19
Sign Permit, Temporary 27
Silver View Park Shelter
Building 84
Sign Deposit, Planning 96
Site Plan Review 34
Solicitors License 64
Special Assessment Search 72
Sprinkler Permit 16
Sprinkling System 102
State License Verification 106
Storage Shed 102
Storm Water Management 87
Street Light Utility 109
Street Opening Permit 70
Structures 1
Stucco 4
Subdivision 35, 36
Surcharge 90
Surface Water Management 113
Swimming Pool, Permit Fees 102
Swimming Pools 26
SWM Charge 87
Tapping Water or Sewer Main 100
Tax, Sales 93
Temporary Mobile
Home Permit 29
Temporary Sign Permit 27
Three-Season Porch 102
Transfer of Apartment/Multiple Dwelling
Registration 50
Transient Merchant _ 64
Tree Removal 95
Unit Charge (Sewer) 88
Used Car Sales 63
Utility Bill 43
Utility (Bill) Search 72
Utility Shed 102
Valuation Table Page 1
Variance 31
Ventilation 20
Video Tape Copies 105
W.A.C. Charge 39
Water Availability
Charge (WAC) 39
Water Bill (late fee) 43
Water Rate 98
Water Connection Permit 40
Water Hydrant 94
Water Meter --- --- __ - -_- - 41
Water Quality 114
Testing Charge - MN Dept. Health
Water Service Restoration 44
Water Shut Off Fee 45
Wetland Alteration Permit 38
Wood Burning Stove 11
Wrecking 12
Wrestling Permit 71
Zoning Code, Copy 77
******************************************************************
Building Permits (Chapter 59)
Minimum Fee. The minimum fee for all permits shall be $15.00
unless otherwise specified.
Valuation Table. The following Valuation Table shall be used to
determine fees for those permits so indicated below and in all cases
where the work is of such a nature that the permit fees cannot be
determined from the schedule established below for such work.
$1 .00 to $500.00 $15.00 for the first
$501 .00 to $2,000.00 $500.00 plus $2.00 for each
additional $100.00 or
fraction thereof, to and
including $2,000.00
$2,001 .00 to $45.00 for the first
$25,000.00 $2,000.00 plus $9.00 for
each additional $1 ,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and
including $25,000.00
$25,001 .00 to $252.00 for the first
$50,000.00 $25,000.00 plus $6.50 for
each additional $1 ,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and
including$50,000.00
$50,001 .00 to $414.50 for the first
$100,000.00 $50,000.00 plus $4.50 for
each additional $1 ,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and
including $100,000.00
$100,001 .00 to $639.50 for the first
$500,000.00 $100,000.00 plus $3.50 for
each additional $1 ,000.00 or
fraction thereof to and
including $500,000.00
$500,001 .00 and up $2,039.50 for the first
$500,000.00 plus $3.00 for
each additional $1 ,000.00 or
fraction thereof
******************************************************************
General Construction:
SURCHARGES NOT INCLUDED IN ALL FIGURES LISTED
BELOW (See "Surcharge" for further-information):
1 . buildings, structures, footings - use valuation table
2. excavating, grading, filling - $20.00 plus $2.00 per 1 ,000
square feet or fraction thereof over the first 1 ,000 square feet
plus 2.5 times any expense for survey work by the City plus
$.50 surcharge
3. sidewalks, driveway, parking lots, patio (no surcharge) -
$15.00 plus $2.00 per 1 ,000 square feet or fraction thereof
over 1 ,000 square feet
4. stucco $15.00 plus $4.00 per 1 ,000 square feet or fraction
thereof over 1 ,000 square feet plus $.50 surcharge
5. reshingling - $15.00 plus $2.00 per 1 ,000 square feet or
fraction thereof over 1 ,000 square feet plus $.50 surcharge
6. residing - $15.00 plus $2.00 per 1 ,000 square feet or fraction
thereof over 1 ,000 square feet plus $.50 surcharge
7. platforms, seating - $20.00 per platform and $15.00 per
seating unit plus $.50 surcharge
8. fences (no surcharge) - $20.00 per installation
9. door or window installation using existing window frames - no
fee
door or window installation using existing rough opening but
changing window frames - $15.00 plus $2.00 per window
door or window change in rough opening - use valuation table
10. garbage/recycling enclosure - $20.00 (no surcharge)
11 . wood burning stove - use valuation table
12. wrecking - $20.00 plus $2.00 per 1 ,000 cubic feet or fraction
thereof over 2,000 cubic feet plus $.50 surcharge
13. raising, shoring - use valuation table-see surcharge and plan
check fee for additional charges
14. moving buildings over streets
A. larger than 12' x 24' x 25' other than accessory building
- $110.00 per building plus $.50 surcharge
B. accessory building larger than 12' x 24' x 25'- $ 70.00
per building plus $.50 surcharge
C. smaller than 12' x 24' x 25' - $ 35.00 per building plus
$.50 surcharge
15. moving buildings over private land - $30.00 per building plus
$.50 surcharge
16. Pipe Fitting (plus surcharge)
A. gas, oil piping - use valuation table
B. steam, hot water heating systems - $25.00 plus $5.00
per 100,000 BTU per hour or fraction thereof over
200,000 BTU per hour
C. fire extinguishing equipment
(1) standpipes - $20.00 per standpipe
(2) sprinkler equipment- $30.00 plus $4.00 for each
ten sprinkler heads or fraction thereof over ten
heads
17. Plumbing Work (plus surcharge)
A. plumbing fixture, devices, connections - $15.00 plus
$7.00 per fixture, device and connection
18. Refrigeration Work (plus surcharge)
A. equipment under 100,000 BTU per hour capacity
(12,000 BTU per ton) - $15.00 plus $2.00 per 10,000
BTU per hour or fraction thereof over 10,000 BTU per
hour capacity
B. equipment over 100,000 BTU per hour capacity (12,000
per ton) - $35.00 plus $2.00 per 100,000 BTU per hour
or fraction thereof over 100,000 BTU per hour capacity
19. Signs, Billboards (no surcharge)
A. signs up to 100 square feet - $50.00 $3500 for the first
24 square feet plus $5.00 for each additional 25 square
feet or fraction thereof of to 100 square feet
B. signs 100 square feet and over - $75.00 $6500 for the
first 100 square feet plus $10.00 for each additional 100
square feet or fraction thereof
C. signs: refacing or altering - $20.00 per installation
20. Heating and Ventilation Work (plus surcharge)
A. gas, oil burner equipment - $25.00 plus $5.00 per
100,000 BTU per hour or fraction thereof over 100,000
BTU per hour input (commercial, rooftop units)
B. gravity warm air heating - $35.00 per installation repair,
alteration or extension
C. mechanical warm air heating - $25.00 plus $5.00 per
100,000 BTU per hour or fraction thereof over 200,000
BTU per hour input capacity
D. duct or tin work - Use Valuation Table
E. ventilation systems
(1) using fans less than 100 CFM - $5.00 plus
$2.00 for each fan
(2) using fans more than 100 CFM - $25.00 plus $2.00
per 1 ,000 CFM or fraction thereof over 3,000 CFM
plus $5.00 for each fan
21 . General Sheet Metal Work - Use Valuation Table (plus
surcharge)
22. Incinerators (plus surcharge)
A. domestic portable incinerator - $25.00 per unit
B. commercial, industrial incinerator - $60.00 per unit
23. Elevators, etc. - Use Valuation Table (see surcharge and plan
check fee for additional charges)
24. Installation of Mobile Homes - $35.00 per Installation (plus
$.50 surcharge)
25. Satellite Dishes - $20.00 per Installation (plus $.50 surcharge)
26. Swimming Pools
Filling - $25.00 plus $1 .0 15 per 1 ,000 gallons of water used
Bldg. Permit _ Valuation_Per_Square_-Foot _- _ _ _ -
Above Ground $6.00
Below Ground $20.00
With Decking/Fencing Add: $2.00
See Valuation Table when value has been determined. Also
see surcharge and plan check fee for additional charges.
27. Temporary Signs - $15/21 day period
28. Contractor Licenses (Chapter 60) (see Building Dept.
Procedures Manual for specific license type) - $40/Year
State License Verification Fee - $5.00 per permit
29. Temporary Mobile Home Permit - $50 $35 + $10/Renewal
30. Rezoning - $200/acre, minimum $200, maximum $1 ,000
31 . Variance - R-1 to R-2 - $75, all others $200
32. Conditional Use Permit - R-1 to R-2 - $75, all others $200
33. Code Appeal - $75
34. Development/Site Plan Review - $100/acre, minimum $100,
maximum $500
35. Minor Subdivision - $150
36. Major Subdivision - $250 plus $250.00 deposit
37. Relocation of Building (Chapter 45) - Expenses of Inspection
38. Wetland Alteration Permit (Chapter 48) - $50 plus deposit
determined by Staff
Wetland Buffer Permit - $10.00
39. Water Availability Charge
A. Residential - $200 $225 per unit
B. Commercial/Industrial - Larger of $800 $900
or $225 $200/36,000 Gallons of Water
Consumption/Quarter
40. Water Connection/Repair Permit
A. Service less than 4 inches - $20 $25, + $.50 Surcharge
B. Service 4 inches or greater -$-40 $50 + .50 Surcharge
41 . Water Meter - $ 85
42. Non-Return of Meter Reading - $1-0 $15.00 Charge
43. Late Payment - 10% of Bill
44. Service Restoration - $50 $65
45. Combination Shut Off & Curb Stop - Cost + $25
46. Sewer Connection/Repair Permit - $20- $25 + $.50 Surcharge
47. Waiver of Load Limits (Chapter 80) - $ 20/entry/truck
48. Dog Licenses (decreased by 50% after one year)
A. Spayed or neutered - $ 7/2 Years
B. Unspayed or Unneutered - $13/2 Years
49. Kennel
A. Residential - $ 30/Year
B. Commercial - $ 50/Year
50. Multiple Dwelling Registration - $5/Unit with minimum of
$30/building/year
Transfer - $15.00
Intoxicating Liquor (Chapter 100)
51 . On-Sale without Cabaret - $5,000 + $60/100 sq. ft. or part
thereof of public area in excess of 4,000 square feet not to
exceed $10,000/year
52. On-Sale with Cabaret - $5,000 + $85/100 sq. ft. of public area
in excess of 4,000 square feet not to exceed $10,000/Year
53. On-Sale Wine - $800/Year
54. Off-Sale - $200/Year.
55. Bottle Club - $330/Year
56. Investigation Fee
wine general liquor
A. Single Person $300 $350
B. Partnership $365 $385
C. Corporation $400 $450
Non-Intoxicating Liquor (Chapter 100) - 3.2 Beer (subject to 10%
late payment fee)
57. On-Sale - $1 ,000
58. Off-Sale - $100/Year
59. Set Ups - $330/Year
60. Club - $330/Year
61 . Garbage and Rubbish Hauler (Chapter 104) - $75 +
$20Nehicle/Year
(subject to 10% late payment fee)
62. Gasoline Stations (Chapter 106) - $50 + $8 Per Pump
Exceeding 2/Year
(subject to 10% late payment fee)
63. New and Used Car Sales (Chapter 109) - $150/Year
(subject to 10% late payment fee)
64. Peddlers/Transient Merchant (Chapter 110) - $60/day,
$100/month, $500/year, plus $10.00 investigation fee for new
peddler plus $2.50/person for I.D. card
Transient Merchant - $60/day, $100/month, plus $10.00
investigation fee plus $2.50/person for I.D. card
65. Restaurant (Chapter 111)
A. Class A (occupancy load greater than 100)
(1) Operating-16 Hours/Day-or-Less—$275/Year
(2) Operating More than 16 Hours/Day - $550/Year
B. Class B (Occupancy Load of 100 or less)
(1) Operation 16 Hours/Day or Less - $165/Year
(2) Operating More than 16 Hours/Day - $330/Year
66. Recuperation or Half Way House (Chapter 113)
A. Less than 10 Beds - $ 33/Year
B. 10-49 Beds - $ 55/Year
C. 50-99 Beds - $ 82/Year
D. Over 110 Beds - $110/Year
67. Amusement Devices and Centers (Chapter 114)
A. Devices - $55/Year Each
B. Centers - $300/Year
68. Bowling Alleys (Chapter 115) - $20/Alley/Year
69. Amusement Rides, Carnivals, and Circuses (Chapter 116) -
$125 for First Day + $20 for each additional day
70. Street Opening Permit - $500 to $700 per opening
$15 + $15/Deposit/Sq. Ft.
71 . Boxing and Wrestling Proccscing Fee $100/Event
(regulated by the State of Minnesota)
72. A. Special Assessment Search - $10
B. Utility Bill Assessment Search - $10
73. Photocopies - $.25/Sheet
74. Mailed Agendas
A. City Council - $20/Year
B. Planning Commission - $10/Year
75. Mailed Minutes
A. City Council - $40/Year
B. Planning-Commission--$20/Year
76. Council Meeting Packets
A. City Council - $55/Ycar $250\Year
B. Planning Commission - $30Near $175.00\Year
77. City Code Book or Comprehensive Land Use Plan - $200
A. Zoning Chapter $40.00
B. Sign Chapter $5.00
78. Filing Fee for Public Office - $5.00
79. Police/Accident Report - $2/Page
80. Notary Public - $1
81 . Blue Prints
Up to11x17
A. Blue Line - $ .50
B. Mylar - $1 .00
Up to 24 x 36
A. Blue Line - $1 .75
B. Mylar - $4.00
Larger than 24 x 36
A. Blue Line $.30/Sq.Ft.
B. Mylar - $.75/Sq. Ft.
82. New Resident List - $10.00
83. Community Room Rental - $100.00 deposit plus $25.00 fee for
residents/one time uses (i.e., showers, anniversary, Birthdays,
parties, etc.) $100.00 fee for non-residents. No charge for
community organizations for organization meetings
84. Silver View Park Shelter Rental - $50.00 clean-up deposit and
$50.00 key deposit plus $20.00 fee for residents or $50.00 fee
for non-residents
Lakeside Park Rental - $100.00 deposit plus $20.00 fee for
residents or $50.00 fee for non-residents
85 City Hall Shelter Rental - $25.00 deposit plus $20.00 fee for
residents or $100.00 deposit plus $50.00 fee for non-residents
86. Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) - $750.00 $800.00 (Effective
1/1/934 per Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
87. Storm Water Management (SWM)
A. R-1 - $202.00/lot
B. R-2 - $989.00/acre
C. R-3 - $1 ,429/acre
D. R-4, R-O, B-1 - $1 ,429/acre
E. B-2, B-3, B-4, I-1 - $1 ,996/acre
88. Unit Charge (Sewer) - $100.00 per new structure
89. Electrical Work - Same as established in the MN State Board
of Electricians March 1 , 1972, Edition of Laws and Regulations
Licensing Electricians and Inspections of Electrical
Installations or as amended.
Electrical Inspector: Bob Clausen, 777-7885
Blank Forms Available - $1 .50 each
90. A. Building Surcharge - .0005 times the valuation - If permit
has a set fee (not determined by value such as reroof,
—reside,,--excavating, fitting, etc..) thensurcharge-is-$.50
B. Heating Surcharge - $.50 (unless permit fee exceeds
$1 ,000)
C. Plumbing Surcharge - $.50 (unless permit fee exceeds
$1 ,000)
D. Water Permit Surcharge - $.50
E. Sewer Permit Surcharge - $.50
91 . Plan Check Fee - When a plan is required to be submitted by
Subsection (C) of Section 301 of the Uniform Building Code,
except for residential garages, storage buildings, decks and
additions costing less than $10,000.00 a plan review fee equal
to 65% of the building permit fee shall be paid. When plans
are incomplete or changed so as to require additional plan
checking, an additional fee shall be paid based upon Table
3A of the Uniform Building Code.
92. Insufficient Funds (NSF) Check - $20.00
93. Tax - 6.5%, maps, copies
94. Water Hydrant Deposit - $7500- $100.00
A. Water used from hydrant - $1 .0515/1 ,000 gallons
B. Meter Deposit, 2-1/2" - $500.00
C. 5/8" Meter Deposit - $85.00
D. Wrench Deposit - $20.00
E. Hose Deposit - $20.00
F. Adapters - $20.00 deposit
95. Tree Removal - See City Forester
96. Planning Sign Deposit - $50.00 per sign
97. Park Dedication Fee
Residential:
0.0-2.0 Dwelling units/acre $100.00/acre
2.1-3.0 Dwelling units/acre $150.00/acre
3.1-4.0 Dwelling units/acre $200.00/acre
4.1-5.0 Dwelling units/acre $250.00/acre
Over 5.0 Dwelling units/acre 10% of land of
subdivision
Commercial/Industrial 10% of land...
98. Water Charge - $1 .105/1 ,000 gallons
99. Sewer Charge - $43.00 per REC (billed quarterly)
100. Tapping (water or sewer) - City does not perform this service
101 . Administrative Offense:
Snowbirds $25.00 Handicap Zone $100.00
Fire Hydrant $25.00 Fire Lane $25.00
Keys in Ignition $20$4-0.00 Blocking Mailbox $15$ 0.00
30', Stop Sign $15$1.0.00 Expired Plates $25$20.00
Occupied
Vehicle $25.00 Plate/Tabs Missing $20$1-0.00
Truck Parking $25.00 Other Illegal Prkg. $15$1-0.00
Load Limit $100.00 Seat Belts $25$1-0.00
Signs $100.00 Zoning $100.00
Public Nuisance $100.00 Park Ordinance $25.00
Animals $25.00 Junk & Debris $50$26.00
Junk Vehicles $50$26.00 Garbage Dumping $1002&00
Snowmobiles $25.00 Bldg. & Fire Code $100.00
Trespass $25.00 Regulated Bus.Act. $100.00
Alcohol in
Public $50$25.00 Loitering $25.00
Housing Code $100.00 Loud Parties/Noise $50.00
Streets/
Driveways $100.00 Wetlands $100.00
Fireworks $100.00 House Numbers $25.00
102. House/Miscellaneous Building Permits
Valuation per Square Foot
Basic Floor Area 54.31
Basement (semi-finished) 14.92
Basement (unfinished) 11 .40
Attached Garage (Wood Frame) 16.00
Detached Garage (Wood Frame) 12.95
Open Carport 11 .44
Air Conditioning 2.45
Sprinkling System 1 .42
Fireplace:
Brick-Single--(flat-value} 2,000.00
Brick Double (flat value) 2,500.00
Free Standing (flat value) 1 ,000.00
Heatilator (flat value) 2,000.00
Deck 6.00
Deck (Mobile Home) 5.00
Addition 40.51
Second Floor Addition 40.51
Addition (Mobile Home) 20.00
Three Season Porch:
Screened Only 18.00
Wood Frame-Windows/Patio Doors 28.00
Four Season Porch 40.12
Accessory Building (Shed):
Cement Floor 7.50
Wood Floor 5.00
Swimming Pool Above Ground 6.00
Swimming Pool Below Ground 20.00
Decking/Fencing for Pool _ Add $2.00/square foot
Remodeling (use valuation table)
Remodeling (use valuation table)
WHEN TOTAL VALUATION IS DETERMINED SEE VALUATION
TABLE FOR PERMIT FEE. SEE SURCHARGE AND PLAN
CHECK FEE FOR ADDITIONAL CHARGES.
103. Meter Testing - $25.00 $50.00 (free if meter is faulty)
104. Picnic Kits - $10.00 (Residents Only)
105. Video Tape Copies - $25.00
106. State Contractor License Verification - $5.00/Permit
(General Contractor Only)
107. Planned Unit Development - $350
Planned Unit Development Amendment = $150
108. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - $200
109. Street Light Utility - user fees
Residential (includes single family homes, duplexes,
—fo r-p1exes, co-nd-ominiums-and town-horns- 1 .2195/ unit
(monthly)
Apartments - 482 4.20/acre (monthly)
Commercial/Industrial - 5.48 4.75/acre (monthly)
Institutional/Charitable- 548 4.75/acre (monthly)
110. Apartment/Multiple Dwelling List - $5.00
111 . Mounds View Business List - $10.00
112. Dog License List - $10.00
113. Surface Water Management Rates
R1 , R2 Single & Two Family Residential $1 .33/month
R-3 Medium Density Residential $7.27__
/month
R-4, R-5, RO High Density Residential Mobile Homes,
Residential Office $8.82/month
B-1 , B-2, B-3, B-4 Neighborhood Business, Limited Business
Highway Business, Regional Business $11 .31/month
-1 Industrial $8.82/month
PF Public Facilities $3.48/month
PUD Planned Unit Development $10.00/month
CRP Conservancy, Recreation & Presentation $1 .23/month
School/Church, Public Private $4.06
114. Water Quality Testing Charge from MN Department of Health
$1 .43 per quarter
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 8• _
DADS
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 93-696WS
ni
�LC�u° AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 Report Date: 12-1-93
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Update on the November 1, 1993 Discussions with Ramsey County Commissioner
Wedell
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
At the November 1, 1993 Work Session, there were several items discussed
with Commissioner Wedell which Councilmember Quick has requested an
update:
1. Possible relocation of the County's compost site at
Ardan Park to a site near the Golf Course.
2 . Realignment of Old 8 and County Road H - plans and
timeline coordination with City.
3 . Preliminary numbers regarding the County contracting
with the City to provide plowing and sweeping of all
County roads within the City's borders.
Mary Saarion has been pursuing the possible relocation of the compost site
and has provided the attached staff report. Mike Ulrich has examined the
costs associated with a contract with the County for plowing and sweeping
and has included these preliminary_ costs in the attached staff report.
Paul Harrington and Mike Ulrich have also contacted the County to obtain
both the plans and timeline for the reconfiguration of Old 8. That
information is also attached. Coordination plans between the City and the
County will be presented for discussion on Monday night.
(1'' 'l' 62 /(t±-41._.)t.� - ( LL / Q
(),2f
Samantha Orduno, City Administrator
RECOMMENDATION;
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section:
8.
woe Report Number: 93-696WS
STAFF REPORT
Off
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 Report Date: 12-1-93
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Relocation of Compost Site
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
,SUMMARY;
There has been a long standing hope that someday a new site would
be found for the compost pile currently located at Arden Park,
off of Long Lake Road. An idea was suggested that perhaps enough
land is available near the golf course site for relocating the
compost site to this area. Ron Peterson, who did the wetland
work for the golf course was called to do some preliminary
estimations for the likelihood of relocating the compost site
there.
Ron Peterson has staked the wetland boundaries of the portion of
land owned by the City off of County Road J east of Sysco in an
effort to provide information regarding the possibility of moving
the compost pile currently located in Arden Park to this site.
As of today (Nov. 30) the area has not been surveyed, but
hopefully a map showing the area will be available for the Work
Session on Monday, December 6. Also, Ron is looking into
possible areas that may be conducive for the location of an
archery range. I have received information from Ramsey County
Parks and Recreation Department regarding two archery ranges, one
located at a golf course site and one located along Lexington
Ave. in Shoreview. This information is attached.
I spoke to Ron Peterson this morning to relay the message that I
would like to have the map of the wetland boundaries and
available area for a compost site by Mondays meeting on December
6th. He hopes to have the information ready by Monday. I will
have whatever information he has prepared at the meeting.
The Parks and Recreation Commission has a real interest in moving
the compost site from Arden Park for several reasons. One is
that the compost site does smell especially during the Spring and
whenever the windrows are turned. The site is very popular,
being one of the most highly used in the County. However, it is
also one of the most cramped sites in the County. The entrance
REC(3laRTDIAHI6Nis ugly and uninviting to park users. The compost
Mary Saarion, Dire,or of Parks, Recreation and Forestry
pile at Arden Park is surrounded by residential homes whereas
most compost sites are located in areas that are less intrusive
to neighborhoods. The site is also an eyesore. The location of
the compost pile in Arden Park prevents the development of Arden
Park into the natural passive park that it was intended to be.
The site is used by many communities including Anoka County
cities of Blaine and Spring Lake Park. There is a steady stream
of cars coming from all directions of the northern suburbs during
the Spring and Fall months. This is good for composting, but bad
for the neighborhood residents residing around Arden Park.
The County Road J site would be only a short distance farther for
our residents, and certainly more convenient for residents of
Blaine and-Spring Lake Park since-the site would be- off of amajor joint County Road. The County Road J site would be away
from residential neighborhoods. Access would be easy and quick.
Additional information and planning need to be done in the event
that the City Council agrees that the compost site should be
moved to this less intrusive location.
:::•:.::::::•:..i.:::::•::.:• :•Or.4.g.R.V.A.t%•ii 1
...........____
..."4:AKE:::::.:. •
' • I
:.:.:..„...:.:.:.:....:.:.:.
............... ,
.............
.............
............
. i
• 1
•:::•::: • 1
• ...,
ii,,:• f
. ,
,ii?iiiiiiiii IIK,i ::. :1:4'\'.N• I
r.,,,,>2*PPNii:.-1:17 -------•----,,, \k-\--`. 4DA ,
HWY.
li'jib,: •Anik
.......,.. 0,,1,3:3 ..,,,,•"t)• "....'''.\\ ir
••••••••••••••••• .•
......................................r.........:..........................s......................
...................................... ,
•
..:::.::::::$:::::,:,:::•::::::::::::•:::::.:::,: amo:::::,:;:::::.:•::.::::„::•:„.:•:•:,...::.:•:...:.::::::::::„....::.:. ......„ .
.............,,,,,::::,:....„...„....,................„:„,„:•:•:„.::::•:,..:.::.:.::.:„....::.:::::.::.:,...::.:.::: ,
.....:".......k.:11:;2:::::::::.:;:::: : :::::::.:.::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::0:.:a:•::::::::::::::: /
............................................ .
.............. .............. /
....••....•.•........-.............................
".""•"."--------- •".
•••••••••••••••••:::•:••••:•••••:•••::•••••:••:-:••:•.:::•::,:-:••:•:••:••:•:••:::•:•:••:-:••:-:::•:::•::•••:•:•:•:•: 1.:•3 ••; / COUNTY RD. B
.......................,......... ....
:::::::::-::::.:::::....:::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::•;:::::::::g::::::::::-.....*:,:::: 0 '. - • ._ —
,..:-..y.:.:-..:::•:•:;.:-:•:::.:.:-..:•:,:-:::::-..:•:;.:::::::::-..:-::.:-::.:.::•:•..' C ..- 1
RECREATIONAL USE AREAS:
......... ... . . .•
•
L .. •
A BOAT ACCESS
B SPOON LAKE
PICNIC AREA
•.....•.......•.....
••••••••-•••••••••••••••• ••-
••••.-.••.••••.•.••••••• \1 --- .1-
... ... .... ...
.............,.,........,.........
............,.,....,.,.,.,..,.........,.,...
.....•...•.....•••• KELLER ISLAND
1
;- • ,...........,...._" •
. .. . . ..
... .. ... ..
................... ..
•••••••-••• •••••••• - PICNIC AREA
,•,) .••..••....••••••• -,
•-•-••-••••••-••••-••• •-
0 \\
,,, D LAKESIDE
0 P.:;.:•:::::::...::::::::::..... .:;1:16. ..:::::::,:•I'd-i"..; PICNIC AREA
<, 0....)!
r.,•!.
ç; n, LOWER KELLER
,-.-.. E PICNIC AREA •
F71514-; ,ikOigsigirI
eq..;......c.'",,,,;......-:/;?, ......:::::::::::::::••••:::: :::::::::: ,...p 0 F GOLFVIEW
,_.••••••••,,,•go-V?"" -.' ....*:::-:.:-::::-:-:-:,...,,:.:•:' •''N•..
I•i
ce0q.,.C'..-.,,4._fC°i...-...:..,,'r:t..-:-.)7*,,„:"/;..::.`.'..:c::.':W:/1s.::::::i7'e..3.,.::...r.'•:.•.:4.-...-.'..:.
:.::-:'::.:..::I.•:•-•.•t-•..•:.•-/.:•-:-1.:-e:-..;...:-..•..•:4:,--.F(....•?''?.,i••,...-•V`.',,...':,'.r-.s.)
.4
P /"-------0-------C---)C . G ROUND
AWLRAEEKAAE
IL
L
A GOLF COURSE
•iD•g:,, . k•--'4,...V c:::: :, 0 ---_-- ....• -- -- - - -
:A' ........ ,' , ,
... ........
; „::...\ : csg-z CD ................!. •••• r.,,,,,,i..,. ._...._
RC,SELAWN AVE. : , --:,' ' ...*....
..-- • .....- ; orThia)
• =0,.....::.
/ 'eek.--.
• •••Q c7,..:.: :....:- .- -r '.-4.?.(.-t', . LEGEND
. 6. .,,,,,,R;;;.: r. _,.•••-•
i
/
'k::kfi'f,.`-‘...4..-''' •• •••• --t•.. 3<) togie WATER
•• 4.-. cr,'„ ,,,•:'1, 'i:, s .. ' F ';5'•
.CO .,I.:0.: '. 94
X1 '.. .,.•••*--.‘r<ef-"Vc•(;) .:' - '4'. ---•- PARK BOUNDARY
“ro.,-;,(..tt:r4.t.t.:;'4<• . -... -_. a,•17-.
114):Y-QPI cCj.
r ,,k1‘.t...`t#..• ''...3.: '•••••...4•;;"
'I ...•,::-..-4 .:;'5.:`1'.•'..', . ## ss ...:::-.\..e)i
MARSH
EAST WOODED AREAS
. . ..,;;r4,,c7,•:-,5(;ti . -., ,,-- - 0 .0.,
: . ,,,
. fi,: .. ..i ,---_-,'
. c,.,..,3-14,, -... s.../0
''.. .. ......',, .:.5.:•P:::: : ::::::.:.....4)6'
VS'Vf•:-i,-; :i
PAVED PATH
WILLARD MUSIGER
.** 1#•::::-Mii.::-.AM.,I.M.1.0:.:.:.7.7-'.........•:-..::::.: : •••••••••.*::::.iii:-..i:i.,..:::::ii:Pii.iiii.OPM:Mi::.. STATE TRAIL
41 1.::::.::::::.::::::: :.:::::•,...::::,..:::::„.•••:::,.,.•::if:*i*:::.:X.. .::::::.:...:i:i:iff.:••. •-:.::-.i..t.s.::i:i*.:::::.::::-:::i:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.*:*•:-:::::i:K•i::::.::.::..
,-..•.:.:.:••..-..-..:.:.:.:•:•:-:-...:::.:::.:...:.:-....:::::::-......::::::.:::::::::::::::::.:::.:. , --:::::::::::.:.:i:K:i::::.:i:m:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.
-I. 4
1---
cc
2 1000. KELLER . REGIONAL PARK
RAMSEY.COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
ED Parks and Recreation Department
Gregory A.Mack,Director
IIillik
2015 N.Van Dyke Street Tel:612-777-1707
RAMSEY COUNTY Maplewood,MN 55109-3796 Fax:612-777-6519
November 18 , 1993.
Ms . Mary Sar ion
Director of Parks and Recreation
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112
Dear Ms . Sarion:
Enclosed are the layouts for the two Ramsey County archery
ranges , Marsden and Keller Regional Park . Marsden attempts to
fit the shooting stations into a natural setting, while Keller
is more of a standard layout. Keller has five 20-yard
stations , two 25-yard, two 30-yard, two 35-yard and
one 40-yard. The 20 yard distance is most popular with
hunters , as that is the maximum length of shot they prefer
while hunting. Both sites are fenced with a single gate .
This is important for control and safety. Keller has a berm
behind the butts to stop arrows .
I wish I had better plans of each site , but this is all we
have . You will have to visit each site to see the details of
signs , bow racks , etc .
Pleasecallif you have any questions .
Sincerely,
OW- "-q-161
Larry . Holmberg ,
Supervisor of Planning and Development
LEH: jjh
Minnesota's First Home Rule County
printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 10%postconsumer content
•
• ;
•
:� �• .
•••J
:::• . •.% ' —......0 4114110— .4's. 1.•
- .;�,v
' D
•
:'• ice :=0 ^ ':
• o off ,
. a _
o .
o:. . .,IP -
j .
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section:
STAFF REPORT Report Number:
1117DS
��J AGENDA SESSION DATE Report Date:
DISPOSITION
Item Description:
Providing Snow & Ice Control and Sweeping of the Ramsey County
Roads
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report a
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
This proposal includes preliminary costs related to the City of Mounds View providing snow and ice
control and sweeping of the Ramsey County roads within Mounds View.
The initial cost for the City, which would be billed back to the County, would be the purchase of an
additional dump truck with plowing equipment. (Estimated cost $75,000.00) Staff recommends an
equipment fee of $30.00 per hour plus personnel costs including benefits, approximately $25.00 per
hour. Deicing chemicals would be billed in accordance with the purchase price. Discussion of these
rates is encouraged. (These additional services could be provided by existing personnel.)
Sweeping of Ramsey County roads would be billed at current total personnel costs plus equipment
costs of$35.00 per hour. At this time, the City does not pay for disposal of sweepings. Should this
practice change, then the disposal charges would be added to the invoice.
/`‘Z
jMichael Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor
RECOMMENDATION:
nilor
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 8.
����� Report Number: 93-696WS
STAFF REPORT
VE`nJ AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 Report Date: 12-2-93
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Realignment of Old 8 and County Road H
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY:
Staff contacted the Ramsey County Department of Public Works regarding
proposed plans and construction timetables for the realignment and
reconstruction of the County Road H/Old Highway 8/Highway 10 intersection.
The County has tentatively set Spring of 1996 as the date for construction
to begin.
Representatives of the County informed Staff that no plans have been
prepared for the work. The City can expect to receive preliminary plans
for review purposes sometime in 1995.
//—/ /I /.
Paul Harrington, City anner
RECOMMENDATION;
MEL
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 11.
MHOS Report Number: 93-697WS
12-2-93
STAFF REPORT
if
�° December 6, 1993 Report Date:
AGENDA SESSION DATE
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Purchase of Engine Analyzer
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report N
- Comments attached. N
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
In the 1993 Budget Council approved the purchase of a new engine
analyzer to replace the outdated model. This purchase was equally
funded through the shop, water, and sewer capital accounts, each
supplying $4, 000. During the budget process, this dollar figure was a
rough estimate due to the fact that new technology was being tested and
accurate prices were not available. Staff has had demonstrations from
two of the remaining scope manufacturers, Snap-On and Sun, and received
quotes on both. The quotes are as follows:
Snap-On $16,894.75
Sun $19,995.95
Although these two analyzers do basically the same job, they are not
considered equals and the Sun scope is more suitable for our
application. Some of the reasons staff is recommending the Sun scope
are:
A. Greater Flexibility
1. Computer operated, which is more user friendly.
2. Storage of records for maintenance costs.
3 . Capable of handling more of a variety of different
vehicles and models.
4. Produccs a computer printout of the analysis.
5. Numerous free training classes and updates.
As mentioned earlier, budgeted funds for this expenditure are $12, 000
and the purchase price of the Sun scope with tax is $21, 295. 69. Staff
seeks Council's approval of using $3 , 000 from the sewer capital account,
(730-4121-703) (originally budgeted for a patch trailer) , and $6, 300
from the street capital account, (100-4270-703) originally budgeted for
a changable message sian trailer) to provide the remaining balance for
this purer j, -
- IV 4Z
Mi e Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor
RECOMMENDATION;
Staff recommends the purchase of the Sun Model MCS4000 engine analyzer
for $21,300. 00 and authorization from City Council to utilize other
capital funds for the purchase
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 12.
liNDS
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 93-698WS
�VJ AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 Report Date: 12-1-93
DISPOSITION
Item Description:
PETTY CASH FUND
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARYz
Minnesota Statutes 412 .271, Subd. 5, authorizes the establishment
of a petty cash fund. The City presently has a Petty Cash Fund of
$100 with a per claim limit of $10. The size of the Fund and the per
claim limit have been in effect for fifteen years. Staff believes it
is time to update this Resolution, and recommends that the per claim
limit be $20 and that the Fund Balance of the Fund be $200. Many
small items are purchased by employees with their own monies that are
over $10 and they have to have a special check issued or wait until
the Council approves claims at the next Council Meeting. Increasing
the limit on petty cash claims would make the process of reimbursing
employees for small expenses more efficient.
—a6-`447 /--
EFLCzaliMEZ Donald Brager, ance Director
Adopt Resolution No. 4448, Establishing a Petty Cash Fund
RESOLUTION NO. 4448
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ESTABLISHING A PETTY CASH FUND
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 471.56,
Subdivision 5, authorizes the Council to establish an imprest,
petty cash fund;
NOW4-THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council-does
hereby establish a Petty Cash Fund for the purpose of paying
claims against the City which are impractical to pay in any other
manner. Said Fund shall be regulated in the following manner:
1) the sum of two hundred dollars shall be deposited in the
Fund and shall be maintained as the Fund Balance;
2) the Treasurer, or Treasurer's designate, shall be the
custodian of the Fund;
3) monies shall be disbursed by the custodian only for
proper claims against the City which are impractical to pay
in any other manner;
4) all such claims shall be authorized by the appropriate
department head prior to disbursement by the custodian;
5) no such claim shall exceed twenty dollars;
6) no claims shall be for salary or reimbursement of any
personal expense of a City officer or employee;
7) the custodian of the Fund shall submit a claim itemizing
all the various demands for which disbursements have been
made from the Fund to the Council at the next meeting after
transfer of monies from the appropriate funds in order to
maintain the Petty Cash Fund.
Adopted this 13th day of December, 1993 .
(SEAL)
Mayor
Clerk-Administrator
- ._7- 13.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section:
G�f�D Report Number: 93-699WS
STAFF REPORT
11if
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 Report Date: 12-2-93
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Discussion of Greenfield Ponds Development Agreement
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
$UMMARYz
Catherine Harstad, representing the Harstad Companies, has asked Staff to
approach the Council regarding the issuance of building permits on the
Greenfield Ponds development prior to completion of the project as
stipulated in Development Agreement 92-97 .
Paragraph 10 of the executed Development Agreement states that:
"The Developer must obtain pre-construction and post-construction
approval of the City Inspection Department for the surface drainage
systems to be constructed on the site. No building permits will be
issued until said approvals are obtained. "
It is the opinion of Staff that all phases of the project - including
installation of storm sewer and ponding areas, construction and completion
of the road and, final site grading are all a part of the surface drainage
system. At this time, a significant portion of the project is complete;
However, some items do remain unfinished.
Due to on-going construction on the project, Staff will provide the Council
with a list of items remaining to be completed on Monday Evening.
( 1/
Paul Harrington, City 0/anner
RECOMMENDATION:
111,
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 14.
CMOS
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 93-1000WS
EW Report Date: 12-2-93
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993
DISPOSITION
Item Description:
Discussion of Off—Street parking for Robert's Off 10
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
IF'
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
$UMMARY;
At the November 8, 1993 City Council Meeting, the Council approved the
request of Greg Waste, representing Robert's Off 10, for the alteration of
a previously approved on-site parking and screening plan at 2400 County
Road H2 . Subsequent to Council action, Mr. Waste has done a considerable
amount of work on the property as allowed by the approval. As a part of
this work, Mr. Waste temporarily removed a berm located along the
Southernmost property line to allow for the placement of a six (6) foot
high board-on-board fence. Mr. Waste understood that the removal of this
berm was not a part of the City Council approval and, replacement would be
necessary.
Mr. Waste has recently contacted Staff to ask that a request be placed on
the agenda of the City Council to allow the removal of the aforementioned
berm to be permanent. The attached map is provided to indicate the area
of the berm in question.
Mr. Waste will be present Monday evening to answer any questions the
Council may have.
Paul Harrington, City anner
RECOMMENDATION:
2545 i w ar 643 76'.� N N N N 5491 N 72 - g
7661 N N 5493 5494 5
2541 7664 7641 76 s • GROBERG ST
2539 766 7610 7639 7644 5485 5486 5
2537 76357651 5480 5479
�____._ 7622 7640 --- '
- 7660 76i 7824 aO 7635 7630 5474 5473 5468 5475 5478 5
7645 p 7625 7828 7641
7b5 7626 3 5468 5467
W� 6 AVON , 7624 7611 7610
a z 5462 5463 5464 5463 5fse 4
NI,
o a v v n o 7631 5 a 5445 N5456 I?400 Lo to i o i 40 ro s`9 w 7595 7594 N 5454 5455 44 SSp
^ n ^ n n 7634 7616 y r7 O S
7581 7580 7531 W n 4 5446 5447 0 5435 �G�-.7 Fso Q
5 7 .11
7565 7584 O n 0 5440 5441 Q .>"',3., pxe
'Lhry h h 7551 7550 LL 7521 ¢ N ¢ 5434 5433 !`!6
? Z a 5426 5425 x
T S
04 N K 7535 7534 w 1�
w 7511 5420 5421 542,
>, 7521 7520 E .4^
7501 / 5401 5414 5415 5414 N M N `n 0 0 5 ;t,
7505 7504 5406 5405 5406 N N N N N N
NCTY
BRONSON DRIVE HALL 5395 5394 5395 g-,12 NI no(N 1 1,,,
ON r) N 0 0 m 01
t.
Z la N NI N N N� N N N N N N N N N N i �.
'1 ____ 5394 5387 5386 5367 O I ,
5381 1-- 5380 5381 V
��� I 5373 5372 5373 < '
NN/1/
5365 $366 5367 5366 I r,°�iJ
�? BLI 5359 r3/
3----
'�7 J
5345 5354 N N N N N N N N N N
maw
&sr ® LAMBERT AVE
5337 o N a o N o a ,0 N N
Qp �� 333 5331LAMBERT NN N 02 N N N N N N N Nry p 30
472'
5323 PARK I11
S 5317 532,1
= __I
1...
to ,5309 _ is
(may 44;41"41141114'44111161ft
5298 5301 5302 IL I�`(p .29 5295 ,n n rn n v) m n u) m in- � rnnn �o �naaMNc� '? omNZ 5287 N N N N N N N N N N N N N i '{:�;
N E C. RD H2
N0
v'�i uNi n 5279 N 1) a 1 0 \ b o Ri.
N N p N N N N N N a a 4.1 N ,y'h°' n N
5260 5262 5273 `' "�' •297 w � '4') N N 52 I
5256 5261'•5256 5267 ' .287 C R �c0 ()
5261 11.1111M1 -
;.
5250 5255 5250 5250 , y,:,
5255 0
5244 5249 5144_a0 5292 5309 tiP ;
5249 0: v) N u) rn M q,
w 5238 5243 5238 5243 a v a •' • • rn ry0
5280 psi rt. u)
�[ 5237 5232 5237 CLEARVIEWN N AVE 5280 5289 N
CC 4 40 0 m 4o CO 0 N 40 5270 5279 5270 N
Q 523103 5226 5231 v v v a a a 7. v � WOODA
a: Y N N N N N N N N 5260 5269 52609 '',: t 4 260
5225 5225 X259 5250 (1.• N
n - 52IY n 0 e 0 n N 5250 5259 _5250 5259 5250' N
In '� 5219 5214 5219 N N N n N N N r 5240 5249 .5240 5249 5240 5249 5240 4Q 5205 N
N N
LANE 5230 5239 I"523052390 5230 5239 5230 ti ryry�
N m 0 At N 0 a 40 40 0 N 40 c
• N iA N ,� 0 N 5213 a ^a a v a 5220 5229 5220 522•• 522'5229 5770 fid•
. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Wt4, 4
5206 • 5207 0 rn n in ^ ro q >5210 5219 5210 5219 X 5210 5219 5210 1 00 ryryh
-----g- 5200- 5201-a- v-- < a �- ,141. `L
N N F,414.3- N N N N 5200 5209 -200 5209-'52005209 5200
DR5744 5157 WOODALE DR
150 5155 5138 5149 5150 51551 o o a o o ryR _
5132618C N 518! (N N(N N*JrN 4L
140 5143 5141 NNNNN
5144 5185 N N N N N
5126 5133 p 5170 5179
5140 5175 4
130 5135 _5120 5160 5169
0
5125 w 5136 5165
126 5127 Z 5114 -4 5150 5159 `;.3
O 5117 5128 5155
'14 5115 51 5109 g 5120 5145 5140 5149 ry,�k
-----q— r( ^ n FI fr 5130 5139 'V
108 e• 5100 N NI N 5101 5108 5135 EDGEWOOD
« DR 5100 5101 0 JR. HIGH
w 5092 N a i 5090 5091 3 SCHOOL
F.�'ii o n 5093 5090 p � w 5100
)8 T 5084 N N N 5071 5080 5075 Z 5080 SO81'0 �..'
078�-.•'.�- 5074 5070 5071 m 507D 507111�� �0:ry
68— 50649 5060 5061
62 5081 5067 5068 5061 5050 5051
)56 Er. 5080
i in• S054In 5066 5051 5040 5041 r
I a 0 on
ly 5046 N N N N N 5064 .0 5030 5031 I h N N N N
N N
NN
N
CO RD N I N
ss
OUNDS
Irlior
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 15.
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 93-1001WS
BC S AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 Report Date: 12-2-91
DISPOSITION
Item Description:
Discussion of Request for Rezoning and Development Review, Multi—Tech/Everest
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
Everest Development, representing Multi-Tech, has made application for the
following within the Mounds View Business Park:
1) Development Plan Review - Review of a proposed 59, 970 square foot two-
story building/facility expansion of Multi-Tech Systems to be constructed
to the West of the existing Multi-Tech building. Staff has reviewed the
submitted application and narrative provided by the applicant and found the
request meets the intent of the Municipal Code as it applies to this
request including land use, setbacks, zoning(if approved) , parking, etc.
A review of the provisions for storm water control on the site is currently
underway. Staff anticipates no problems with storm water control on the
site as the ponding area constructed as part of the existing Business Park
was sized to handle the further development of this property as well as the
property to the immediate West.
2) Rezoning - Currently, the property located immediately West of the
Mounds View Business Park is zoned B-3, Highway Commercial (please see
attached map) . The applicant is proposing that the aforementioned property
be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development, to accommodate the proposed
use of that parcel by Multi-Tech for required parking area. Also, the
rszoning would provide consistent zoning for the entire Bu-siness Park
complex.
I have included a very comprehensive application submittal provided by the
applicant for your review. Everest Development will be present on Monday
Evening to give a complete presentation of the proposal.
The Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the requests and
recommended approval in Resolution Nos. 371-93 and 372-93 . Copies of both
Resolutions are provided for your review.
Paul Harrington, City P nner
RECOMMENDATION:
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 371-93
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REZONING REQUEST OF
EVEREST DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING CASE NO. 367-93
WHEREAS, Everest Development has made application to rezone.
the property located South of County Road H2 and Northeast of Highway
10 from B-3 , Highway Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and
WHEREAS, the property is legally known as:
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of
the Southeast Quarter lying northeasterly of U. S. Highway No.
10, and the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter, all in Section 8, Township 30, Range 23 ,
Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the United States
Government Survey thereof; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 40.25, Subdivision A(5) , provides that the
Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects of the
proposed amendment. It further states that judgement shall be based
upon, but not limited to, the following factors:
1. Relationship to Municipal Comprehensive Plan
2 . The geographical area involved
3 . Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate
the area in which it is proposed
4 . The character of the surrounding area
5 . The demonstrated need for such use; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed
the request in relation to the aforementioned criteria; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning request is consistent with the City's
- . . - • . - ' on for this •roperty
which is mixed use planned unit development; and
WHEREAS, approval of the request will provide for a zoning
designation which is consistent with the current and proposed land
use.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission recommends approval of the request to rezone the property
legally known as:
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of
the Southeast Quarter lying northeasterly of U. S. Highway No. 10,
and the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter, all in Section 8, Township 30, Range 23 ,
Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the United States
Government Survey thereof.
Resolution No. 371-93
Page Two
from B-3 , Highway Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs
Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval
of the minutes.
Adopted this 1st day of December, 1993 .
ATTEST:
Chairman
(SEAL)
Planner
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 372-93
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST
OF MULTI-TECH, 2205 WOODALE DRIVE, PLANNING CASE NO. 367-93
WHEREAS, Multi-Tech has requested City approval to
construct a 59 ,970 square foot addition to their existing
facility at 2205 Woodale Drive; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 59 . 07 of the Mounds View Municipal
Code requires that a development review be conducted for all
commercial and industrial developments within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
following documents regarding this development proposal:
1. Planning Application dated October 29 , 1993
2 . Site/Landscape Plan dated October 4 , 1993
3 . Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan dated
October 14, 1993
4 . Exterior Elevation Plan dated October 8 , 1993
5. Floor Plan dated October 27, 1993
6. Electrical Site Plan dated October 27, 1993
7 . Illumination Distribution Plan dated October 27,
1993 ; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that
the proposal is in conformance with all applicable requirements
of Chapter 40.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
Planning Commission recommends approval of the development review
request.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the-P-lanni-ng-Commission_
directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council
prior to approval of the minutes.
Adopted this 1st day of December, 1993 .
ATTEST:
Chairman
(SEAL)
Planner
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
PLANNING APPLICATION .
APPLICANT: Multi-Tech Systems , Inc. Phone 785-3500
ADDRESS: 2205 Woodale Drive, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
• Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code •
Interest in Property (check appropriate box):
El Owner of Property
❑ Contract for Deed Owner
0 Lessee, Operator, Manager
Agreement to Purchase Portion of property west of existing Multi-Tech
. E Other (explain) property to be acquired from Commercial Propert
Investments, Inc.
Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before final City action of this requPsf
PROPERTY INVOLVED:
Address/General Location 2205 Woodale Drive and adiacent property to west. north
of Highway 10
Legal Owner: Name/Address Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. , and Commercial Property
Investments, Inc. , 2685 Long Lake Road, Roseville, MN 55113
•Present Use (check appropriate box):
❑ UndevelopedNacant •
❑ . Single Family Dwelling
❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling
❑ Multi-Family (No. of Units ) .
❑ Business/Commercial Establishment
❑ Industrial Establishment Portion of property currently developed with
• E'I Other (explain) parking and associated improvements serving
Multi-Tech' s existing facility at 2205 Wooda'
Property Classification: x❑ Abstract ❑
Torrens Drive
REQUEST: Application for General Concept and Development State P.U.D. approval
to construct 59,970 square foot expansion to existing Multi-Tech corporate head-
quarters/manufacturing facility, with associated parking and site improvements;
rezoning of acquisition parcel from B-3 to P.U.D.
I HERESY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUE.
Signature
*************x******** ***.***..*x*****xx******x****x,.**xxx** **x,,,,,,,**x„*.**** ,.***,.****
Rezoning 5200/acre,minimum 5200. maximum 51,000 Park Fund Dedication Fee
Variance R-1 to R-2-575,all others$200 Date Paid
Conditional Use Permit R-1 to R-2-575,all others$200 Receipt Number
Code Appeal $75
Develop./Site Plan Review 5100/acre,minimum 100,maximum $500 Additional Fees Paid
Minor Subdivision $150 Date ePtid
Number
Major Subdivision 5250 plus $250 deposit p
Comp. Plan Amendment $200G'
Wetland Alteration Permit 550 plus deposit determined by Staff TOTAL FEES PAID // G,e _ C C
Wetland Buffer Permit $10 DATE PAID
Planning Sign $50 RECEIPT NUMBER .L ^ '"
PUD $350
PUD.Amendment $150 Date of final action
/ APPROVED ❑ DENIED J TABID 0
Date l - 7 G .. Planning Case No. ' �' — / `'" Admin.Account No.
NOTA: Planning Application fees totalling $1 , 100 are still on file with City from prior
Planning Application submitted 7-29-93 , and subsequently withdrawn.
5425 1 542 ./\';',;;;;,..,—W 1 542
"' 7525175341 s I i I �'I N 7si1 541 542 1 549 r1iH° N
541 c 1 5115 5414
H I nr8 1 BN I 5412 nm Nh1' In 1H
790517504 7501 ya015404 1 5405 1 NI nN1N1 N1 1 5405 N N N N _
N 5_'.80
. . DRIVE 3,4 W
5372 .4-
5395 15394 5395 _Y ;1 ig 1 21 oN 1 Z l n 1 n 1•7 1 N ry H IV'
7.T2 5_`921 5391 53921 5391 4366 0 y
4
5387 5386 15387 V n N N-3 N N N N N N N 1`1 1'' N- 1` 538615385 538615385 6
9 VI
53411 5380 338tIU 5_P015379 G 538015379 4514,735, 141
® 5372 15373 ' 1 5272152:1 537215371 X25 _
am 5 366 1 5367' 4
367425
8-3 SISI 536a 15362 536415363 G34. —S
atir Z 1 535815357 525815357 5259 ?1ii 1 5_3' t
Eft ® ..1.31-1
•
�j x , �1n N N N N o -�� 535215351 535215351 5J}
3iS�+ N N NIN N N N N .
�1 5345 N N N I N N N AvE N}_415343 53445343 53 •• N
® , _ • '
�2 wt �- �t SIN H 1:1 8 rn'co U 152381 5337 532815237 532• •
® } 3 NIN. N H N N 1 N _ ^ 5 5 5 2 C
JO 0 5 3t WJBERT N N N N N N N (V N N — 330 29 301 3291 531:
A010533°
PARK 0 532415323 532415323�J``31; 44
® ® ® $32 y PF 5316153/5 ^ 531 6 1 531 5{" •c30. ,
5309 530815307�ri 530815_307 530 'r1
®�. Q '5:99 —1 5300 C4 ..
c 5298 5301 47'17112 T07 530015299 530015299 2
529•
'�� 1 5295 J I. a, — n a rn n 1n a _ y 1 5�g41 cog} 5�a415�93. '`..29• J
2S4,:,s,li
kA4200.• :'29 a m 10 n 7/ •N N _ G I _I
L.-sr) 5287 N I N N N N I N N N N N 1 N I N I N 1 N N I !V 52881 5257 52881 5287 4•28;
' °FC)i/ ''' o
L
5 1 r, h 5275 5257
5297 -4 a h
5287 6-3 . • I q.t.: '1.,' 5262
9-3
529215309 17) PUD 5251
N 52901 5299 • 4114441,
O 52 •
AVE
52801 5289 5280 nlh� r 30
1• .0 52701 5279 527•
�.I i,. 526015269 5260. 5269 470144A~~' '260 IMC00ALE
•
1 -N 52501 5259 52501s�a9 I �1"' g++l l = r.
_ �N 5200
I 524015249 524015244 5240 524 240 5205 ' } N " 5201 :
.
m 5.23015239 523015239 52301523• 52301 I• �,
tifn 522015229 52201522' 52205229 5220 1 ti 7
ti
��n C 521015219 521015219:5210 5219 5210 ; t /
'Y h a 52001 5209 .200152 * 520015209 52001 'V
OR •
4tef m,N a Nn �
". i
•1 '�'k
NNhN
15179 "=a 8-3; ( /
15169
)
1
15159 ncm 4
•
15149
,
//41 •
PROPOSED AREA FOR REZONING
B-3 TO PUD
•
\\\:'•
EXISTING MULTI—TECH SITE •
(INCLUDING EXPANSION)
tt ;til _ ft
CzV--.11 � ; r.....
> , vlouuutr( 'ratA spunRn aeUp a(yppoor "OZZ
cam°` ';` r:. va Ill
suia1sAs gaaytliny�i f t sl..'1
, !�. h .. 1...:l=ail
\ ,2 , ) 4.
133a1s AQINno B
1 - ,.M— --• -- .::us.. -- C s
i d ; IIIIIIIiII►IHHIIIII §;
• hi R t
0 0
z
c § —
1 m to
IL SW I
5-4 I i
tO n W ( ' I -
Z .I ( ., Y —
(• _
s , .,\ •. "3 _ ` r I ice: 4
S w a aA't • _ .. o
I 07,yO _ r
-I oa.f0FI: — - ^y' _ GAO
z ! oma<°i 3 r
.._i l ) ) )7-'-)— ,
OA a 41
.I 1 .,rid -O '/ —
o
S IIr. III I I r1t 11'1 III I = : . _ .,-•s aL
•
-ill ..•._. •e»...«• sc o ,4.. -- :;`I I
12 �: I KI •
uTirii'i" 111 �t��:.�5.U:: I I I 11 1 t�7) ,a i \ 0a
•
.1 ,",,, ,..'
V U�.t a s.<b•s Y al I Y JOU•- •Sinai.i F r . , \\u.tJx3:; , ( 11. r f;:� 11 I 1 111 I� 1 i I I 1 ( >, - \\
9,k (:1, I K�•�1.J1111 III , 11111 11 t:��}
I, s' „„x.e..M•.ai.x }1'„..,,,,,:t. o:.,.,.. tenet ba7.nx J } \\1'
i t . i 71AN .
—
"I� -Jill! 11 III I IllllilllinlxIII 11 11111111 ! I lll11 1111111 11 _�QI \\,
Yr a� -�_f _ \ ��P a
G
_______I
rr.r.
ds1,g5 •\\ / t� at _ ,
� ti_, \ J' U
N
�I�i%1 z
Q
NIV u1 \,.
I . ,.. ,.,. ���1 ..., W
1 L L �` _I`W 1` N N NI - - dT 0
,,_.,,
N Vi1N N N N .1.-4, C
1 MT,N O al r7.r c eO�,nIhlNl2l I-. , .
4-I,-- NNll�l01 M Cn en ^I/1'�icm Rlnl'
i/,,-1, N`N NN - WI°�NNNN
)..-tr - /
ZO < /
K00 I—I— J m
❑.u.J Z..Q F W Q c
OO,a- K¢� O <^ 2
�w V,2 Q
O�NO� 00 �Z¢O¢ m • J /
. Q 000 O00 �
I.. ZZ Z OON Q Q°'>4U < 0 /
aI 4 -5635 zzza d k�,_UJ V,= Wa1 i ?
. 9 O - - =6359. m a (no0a°Ji,- O /
mmm G If ° °°
,jou $ooz.w Q �Ur,�wanz W O� V•53 i�* ,� a g . i
Q Zz_ �aaP m Iy mozLzam WO / WI i ��i S pe 7 �: !�,
= 5ZinR /,NNO o — xSo-o _ / �I ^�� sad �. _:�
• xXx a9. 0 563 6354 I v 3_.4
to W W W W Q U (n U CO a N O.-v Z f ;� x J� - 'I o$ Sf
WI ■
e a S a,s; 1/4 s' Egi#a 1,r1;" MI
/ a 8635 4 11' ill. yab_te 1;4; ; ,,l
O .v ,
2 0 cd=i
n
__—__ .m - �� JIB I 0(-,l ° �;: SA�
]VW i\. li i 'i'`e f 't; lUt1..La�IUJ :VVLJVCI,� „ .ate �punoN a.a0 vav,�,.�.� j IV_1 s 0
e
=VIC.: �+ �a y 7r � r
C'?d 11 I: .l r g � o�auu 1 a1�PPooY SOZZ
2 I� a1111 1.-.:._— 'j'ff� 'a = SI IILSAS H33.LI.LIni1 j 1.1;r
i
e,
•
Lnais A;tiino i
y
: aa
z 44 . e,
Q 11 I "I k
Z ee
W u s
> t..7j
ca J N '^
re
❑ x
ZZ H u u a H
Q3
wVnao
J SWii 1
7 WOH •
an I-ZH 1
...F y L-
Z I-VI I
-J—
N E W
W 1
I
, ,,c. '
ti I -I_11 A 13 J
%i Yfl+ - - ___Ul7C�u'� ii ' jboo
ce St i W—(.4 coo Y�� °'7
z IW — 9 ria o
l '
11 , i� ipis_- 9 �Ia�
I
E — ` � iTalat mini
I,A�' �i!IpFOi 1itgl11�h
!AVN'; -- ; - a '('
♦ ,x aR to / 1, ��
A
0 1 ai ,i ti\ / r y 1 d ,U r.,'
\ --
/?1 7', ---- I
4 a 3, • ,c,\\\\,, \'! 4 Fid
/ "Y a n,_ ' LLQ 0 33..,4 it
% •
t, -
'rte
f
1 r '
.. , /Hi .
l t
1
p�>a No 1.r.1 w'1 ..wl W •q 00er.—mer
.sill a ww T., �yO' O b e• •Pl lwl •n r. ..1..m
��
A:SL7TL• OM 1I' 0,I O.d 7�r 0-`/1 0 0. rT,
r_y`f. 3AMICT 37Yc1a003! SOZZ 4-1 I .51
OrRI1,mawod ,..l...r+r.rn...... 1� �d��' ShII�LS:i:S H.�S,LIS7l11t� f
-o,w a-laua eM .�.-row r o.r r.�a.
�l■WWI as or.arra r,,,•qpm NY7J 11fS 71'7fX1J179 R $C 1�
— :l�1 l I—,
r
IiiMIME
:64 41
1
U
\ Z V y
:6, = s
- 3 / C}
(-- N al
vi -.. x•4 � CD t,t
7
0- w`
FN \
�/ 3\�� =x W
W
i 1`' r
i
o \
0 7//, ------ P a.)--
i g kr / i / N
Nir,
1
till IIII III II II II I (IIIIIIII : I I o
I ' I I I II j Iia I f(� 1 H °o I o z/
;
I • El�il �� 1 I111111 It IU U I II 4 _
j Ill ! 1 11 1 1 1. ' 7111UUILI1 HUG /
I i JI 11 I 111_1_______--1� I ..1 f , /
' 1 \-Iiii_ilLilq\IIIILLL4
H.luiiiiiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_Hivi/_,Hilri il
:\
1 %
i i 31I -\ , _ --,......„,,,,.....,,,.:::, , /- ,_ •L
O
-! QI-51 - - I I I I I ♦ � / P
1 91 Xi- X1 -
1 wiz' IXI f t s----•_ !�--•-------'meq '� ��V
Ln I
J'
p'{aLC3le 6 •
III ` i
I w 6r "!
j Z a$-Aa -a>
I I Jif. • �'•
0000 /
,
Ili�N N N N / 0
•
iff:k m U�a I I /' • - ,
I I / 1t.
.
=.. SL(f.TM ��./J O L LOO 'fV i. •...1,...1.1 '1= `I
9:.•1L:7V...CP .7:7,7, / O`..'OY 7Y0!`.."1 00!!
Y O..0".16\kiln! �V.+•Ih.e/�.y r f\
'.0:71.111 0'",®'n om "= 3.11?iQ 376'0"(100.!1 9000
mi H}NMI C M,..L,.: Jaw
�� `� S/W Sf{S HJ,7J Ido 11/
V../ .�a.....�• w I rrri raunerylsw MOLLYWannr p $
—� J
----------- 211-9—r3fle------------1 _� !�j��
1 -- / _ \ / 6 g pj
I li - gI�
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIID
-v- ,aia i 11 l I0 ( i I:
9iir— —1•143—
I u \ 40
7-1
ix o
c • z� ' I' 3�x� \ • c
s
—3 c o
FY '
W
1 \W \ ••9 ,
M,
/ `\ 7 x d ..
0 IV�J I =W \
Z f( ,
„_.„,
_..._-_ -- ,
. „.....
, . ,...
.„„ .\ -,-
Ns,
\
. 7---- ____._
. ....
. :
. s,
3 t.-- va
i CCW '��.. r�
} =a.3 ?Ir"rtv
�r. ilirriVillilrr\
.
= Ad
F �, / _ -- j - ifi/'dill-i ai / -•- - 7
I/ VWEri Ali►�w�i:�■■■■; ��c 11/p.n.■■c�■:n'0" :„}� ���
• D11 I l `''.f,„ih r.�. a l 'I. i � t� Ali . firs... _'. .”? ` ' ( _
F. 1 ,1��1 �� 1 'i.�`�` 'fi��Willi=lig;.1 i.f �� Cp� 1 I� a .
Atielat art._1 -4611.1.2.-.:-.24...----..0:1,-,4-_4•:.:-__-....-„,ionein ' 'R,:•-tra,,,_ • --•..•.a-ea. --...1 .. �.-1°121211 t'�-I ,,1
Y - .?•♦� �'”.••• 421♦
. ttiraiiiitting.ifitiOgittAiitifiriTetaltilEf.L1.
xime\w...);(47+11w. tivAsIworirelevior- . . ) ,
-,..... ....„-- \/'! ,,Q,
i — \ i
--� �r% / ZDV
v
...--- \/// 4' c".
/
IW •W
\I T. :1:v 1 ,c,,, &lig .,,,,.../.•
• . - •
/ 1 W /, '
-/W O Y y
1 /•
• '
V
_._ --,..... •-• ll L'`i.0Ia. .1.-1 16-.1 U.kiLI.16.1../...1..J. I*' C‘1 61
V2Cr_a ' I ji -.-..........'" II na ow..
L._\.._. '7\:1 Iii 1 P1 viomauutry •itatA spunory an•Ja al•PPonit gO2Z LI 1,1 <
cc-•,&• \\ c,011 "'=.---.....-r-4.......::-.7." I ill SilaiSAS 113aililnj1 li 1,11111,11; 1
\\_ 1. 21: T----:-=,-----= ILI
. il i4 Ill 6 h ? I I II ii tl
..1,
. Z IE"ITI qii "1111"1"1-- 111111-11 a 11111111;111111111 1111 .---
1 Ili!
0
f7: i 1 11 11 11
;1- <i.1 1 1 I 1 s„. "111Il 111 11 6
, .
.N
11 11. 1 i • n 1 !I 11
,., , ql 'a, 1 'II 171i Ili di
4 111: ' T si.i.„ I :11111-1111M11 Oil
. . ,. t.,
lillli i"--i .
1'
, I,, .,-, Iss,.),Itow, :4', , ;•,,l't I1111 ,H1,111111 1 --til >i
...,• A I •44!,•..i .„ i
Z 1'1111 11 1 111111111111 1 tilt-1 \i, wi
-1.
4 '''IlF•Ill ..• / :.:.;-..;
1 <j • I
(:1, *.,••.:• • ';',..'4.: I---• plli, 1...
i...•...18: •.. 7".1..,.; li /I! 1 II 111•11 I(?) a /
• '-...a• a. ,..,1 k..,..,!..-tt).11 1 / 111 2
4
,::, .....„.. Ili a.,
ni•'.',II 4 - ''I,‘
i I 1 I El
102
. (ID i 4 ii °III
F.:77.:1i4 .:i:''',.. 1 (1 1 11 MI I III , -4 g git.
.....las .
ap hi.0.1. olmii: 1 hi
ti. El.•
4 tillr,11.
'...!;;Ig.1!Ir. .1,,,,x„ ,r i
...: '`'-"•••,:'
t,,...,:'''' .
..:,... ' :.„.:
LA/ tear.r(""-^ ll 1 litlig ileirl' t--r (1A
t t)) - . I I 1.1.I
....L . 4 . IA% a.t
.12111-..'•. iimil ; ro_ 6,
iv. . 4' 4
•'MI _II -x; -• en.;
',417 1 .I, 11..44x... $1 II
,_•....... ...,„...: ,,„, , .....
„.:...., . . ..„ ,. ,
...,,, , 11, 111! 11
•
.,. -... .
„..
O 1A.11,;."7,-,;•W Vi:" i,Ai ',,,:,,:':".,,,::(':.'1l
l tuil
) 15:W';'IM E n.=...„. ...-57-4r
Ei
l r i :7111N1111•1 ''''' ; .,' x:
- ,
_:11m11•1 '..-.) f X: ',,.' 0._...r; 4C-,Vg.4.j.M111 ,1
4:_x..IIIWAIIII - t- ,' .s ,,1,-- V4 P.--ftli ri--9 Pr; 111
, all M. -.....
/•'•IIIIIaimm .1 t.:'''r''•:•'..'M
•::,S• \; •m ,immi :*) It zi,•• . .1:1 ..101
I 4.0'.i''IL:4 ' '''l.011al
1.1 =4.7,.IMMIniMMMEMIln
MilliiMI n I 1: l• i!::.1 l• lF '"c4=7
n ....mum P Elt,i1TAID: ,wfmee.m.,,, 7-
,.., ,1, - -1-.,•,,......:: : ,, ,
n '11Fir-:"; 4.'''' t';.i'.'::-..• 1 -.•1 '.`• ' ('-'")' AM IlwAmmo ...........,:or...,,..1 ." i
"• ..''111r7-:-13.` f 1....4..i..i _ ....2 ,..:...c,,. " •
15 . n : •
i ev-;N. a
• ...,:•„V.
i )
*=CIEJ 1f=*R. II
_
' 71.111L.-1 la 11 . .. . IIE
woriu,7,„m4,7,i
-.11•11,..• ' t 4:1‘4'
,-... ,,,,,,, ,1' - `• a. a
4 mii..;• „. ,,...
L',...• i 21. . C ).:-,'...,..• 1111 • -z
,1:1,1111)• .1j,1 • :., s----1
. m :-......,:str.,,,t ......
1 . • Ais I 1..'''f4;•1 . , . • , <I z,"•;6„,... ::-.--.--,11,....Z..7. _
-- 1
,t a
wi -:TLIIPAi i • '466
:
.. ;. ... la
, ..
it E a
' •1.',....i.Ki
.I.".. 'ra I-41 Fro. m=,........ ...
11 .____. ..,'' ....',.11 .... .
. i' '?.<1'N *.. * (1):- r--- •• •• III on=""w III 4
.i-115,'•Er "„,',s,:e•i; • :w• •••• <II: g,
. '-'1111--:• •,;•• '-.',;•••••,:••: n
•rill':t• f 4..1'.4.i ,s, wit 11 :..., •0•: !! ,1..,„.., --,.,... . ..
g on.h...... _rAt.....,
, 11 ,:ri V.a" n •'T :•.,....;•.% • 1 7'E 't',.'•?•3. '-''-
a.I , a
(1-1) li • -IU 13i _alaoa _
' IL iisisi kli
, 66 .1111ill N 1.
n 9 ._ r'z'•, , k : - I q 6:11.^ig' ca ;i111
*--I.----.-=•----Immo -- .1 fi- , t•..±.,-;!.
. ..re
7 =-Ms -.1/
=....2 A... ........,...= t 4
... .
- 1._L- ....... 1. m ar...• ..
2...- _ . _
_ - _
0. KC"' (:1,-,,
'') - d MEOWS .--• Lc I1.1 Eli.'a
i = II....-= II .,....., -'
_ , amain ••,.)...ssz...., -
' aims ° ).:•,
,1,1111ktrii 'S ,-4,1,„;,,f;
•,. . ,< • -1
...!•....;IN ,..., liE t ,..I 1; 1 •A.A.. 7....7
:.:111.1.:III :z.1
4 f I.:, r - 4.
r-•--,,• '4 -,..-v
1- -P!' ,.I 1.•
.al:• Ion,:si! '11-
•,•.,,I.: , .-^•:-..,-„--,,,ill
115-1,..sae- .t t- ,,,..., ., nil! ,..r --- , -- :7- ,-
..,:icm ',,f ''''..:: ' ill 1"..r.z.z, .v.... M.
'a.' 't',II;i 111 .12.1., • q,111k. !!` :,- -M.S.,- ,:i
..„.„,....., ..., •
.. MI
Li IV."Or 1-`- , l','.• En""" •*"a _rx.,`4Zx .,.
•-b.W..--MI: - :.fr, I, Er , EN== um g ...,..t....,-,,,, - , i
,..„ f! ta••,_=lr.; -
, . , . ,. ... . ,,,,- - ,.....
-
I I ',,,,,,,,. ni.:,,:.„.... z;t
z, -,.,,...go -,-.- -••.:_ 1[.
;:. . .. z
iir.,11! oi ,-5, .i.- 1 ;1,4';.: -c31 • . 4;1-1^ ••••": ..:t..7 IL.7-.17..- U•,, <II-1i = •„,..., -...,,,,_.
E:so " 1-1 11)• Ilk„. - :=7: Ilk= • 11111 N ... . =IX.
-'II Tt 111 II ,, ii v.-•i,,,,.,„ --I, t,.. ii, • 1-1 or.... ,nx:.= ,...
r.-!ai..,..al >1 . i It ,.. ..:,P. >I •1 • <ft E.,----Or.....02. 1
..:.a,vdr. 1 .1. 1 I t..., 17 ''.';.-, u-LI :',!, '',---2 1 51 ''''''''''..I-.;[...2..'1,••••••:' .-:- 7 1:11-11 '1•.=
'AARE; •i Si - i .c A ,i II; till ..2... l_ ,/.. ••• E -171 ___.,,,,,, -2.6.
,..,.....;; :114_;t-,-i- wi _4...2:--,..-...:- 1 '2' ? ..:• 1".-I..." -.6.-, 1_-_r----- Mr.v.' (Ui, NI-___,,„„'. _ 011
AI 1:'.1 CAZ1 71 1 t, ,.:1 ' 7 ill:
, - -r.: mo•-• -= - '''^"." ''''"
.
i
'.:•...11. .1 I I"' Ag. LYI.L i.tp.,;••' 0)1: it,.;:a. 1;1•M-11r,f./ tc) ...,,........ ....... „p, .__.= . ,
.,..;_. _...1_ •
1•14.-pr., 0: n , ",'6W 01: .- •-•-•••'-4••- 1111,•, •,,,-. .11.,----:-. IMI ji OA
•• •.;.;: I 4),..,_,11 X;I: 1 ___ ____ S :..... Ellt•-='--.17 <II ...... ---`""'"'w,.'7, ES--• 52 al
(3j) ( 's
‘,..1...) a ,.......
J-,i, ..; I._ 17-1. • _,,..,,,,-., --.
1-14
__,) I,
'1.--vi III,;:+r.•--7_ ma c4.
1,: _
„,.., ,n1•:.
,- --.:.---- u,•
.C..)--, 1.''''1•:''I 11/1:=7::. MIE -...,........ . ,,_, , ,
(1-1iI 1 11_ '
I 1
• i I
i I
• .....
,..
ni•� . i J1N1Y 1Q avv 1:1—I
MA INIMIN
C-Ci°[' ' '\l {� 1 . :..?�.....�'S ir1 ralorauullC 'ra[� apunoA ay1Q a1�PPaaY SOZZ SJ,I*i
c a
I - =– i' SWILSAS H33,LLL'If1N[ II ala 1 i A.
Y
II
•
•
' ®—
f, � 't) r
;.;f , l. 1I1 (VI ._-_.1 , i � i.11 1�1 1 ) (nl t
'a
'g
--- -- -. ��,14-;03 I t s' - - _ -. (pi - - — _. ._. .r---- - I
rL�� I � . I " I
I y � —� r I J q - — ,�' $-
gt ° (i , 8 _ I ( I f .._ , Ila ; i
_tl —et I a-7 .Ilj ' (_t) ; . 11 --- - - - I k d . .
j
6d 1 I � 63 W ,-�-�—� z��•�-.,— I •i - j I 6a �
1°, -_._. _. 1 _ _... I_ . . .. __ g �y . t- . I, z t. ,- - . .._i__, - ' ---- - - ----- . - -- - is c
R, L. i i i w
1 6! , �: 9 ---Y —.�a..� —(' is z
X `
° Is_,
W + • I --- -L-
L N
E n9
n ° I I qhq d Q� 6! J- y1;1 )1a_ _x ° Liii
I
} h—i — •� :1,
• 2 e,s, { _. _ pzz (fit (` . _—Z _ ° }
1 IA L,Ni
...: 0
' 13E1 tii
I g p En 4p
i_. _ .,
e 1
•
., ,R,. . ._
fir. 6a - ,, �, r r_ . zW_` 8 it.
JI --- t{ I .�
• q qa )° 1. iii'.
n 4 I I 1;I
i.. r;n " j—'f Y• m I $t8
t 1 } i I O
o 4 _ I 1'_`L. iu.- - Z
yy
222 ,7i �� S 71, I I Ij .
a 1 I .1_4- _.1 - r�J (n — ---- -- ,,•�
•1 'I I 3, ir ` I �� I'ml�il
— ___,..._1_,._.1. . . . _ti ... __,. 1_ , _1=1•-1EL.,_ , •,;.; L._
t'0J 1 --- I ! - - - �- - - ! -- i .-- IL (.01 . - I - - ! - -- - -�-- -- ------ I ---I - .! =
9
I
Al.,- 9 I �iii r E w
.1:I - l 1 Z til
I Z
i.� W ...T .. -_ I 1 - � Q (_„ - j —1 1-. T--- I-- —1 Q
o Q
..--- - -- - - l'7' 1 - ---1 - •--i-.. .- -t— - --•- -- 0Z
14- I I i I ( � � �t 1 q o
i,„ i,,u, I LL 1,t. I 1 ll'
itE
':I I -- - – – ...}—.. — L_ o (... --L — 1 — I`t — 0
`r' 1. Z - 1i-� • I 1 I I r _
11';i:� I I I . 1 `` ° ( ,,tt I I I I 1 1 II Er_ !
;4
0
I I I - 1 1 I I I
".7- tv›-,.;-1.L,;.`£ .".i T-14.1,:;yi,^1-3.1..1 I —} t::::.:'i • ,;t—'Ir. -- 1". iyt-� 1"., ,
— I I . I t I I
� II) hi; lul .w. t°, (•�i is-� (�) (�) (w) _i
EVEREST DEVELOPMENT LTD
October 29 , 1993
Paul Harrington
Planning Technician
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112
Re: Planning Application
Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. Facility Expansion
Dear Paul:
I believe that under separate cover Multi-Tech Systems,
Inc. , has submitted its Planning Application and related
plan submittals concerning their proposed 59 , 970 square foot
facility expansion. Enclosed as a supplement to that
Application are fifteen (15) copies of narrative materials
further describing the proposed expansion.
We, and Multi-Tech Systems, request that you place this
Planning Application on the earliest possible meeting
schedule with the Planning Commission and City Council. Our
goal is to obtain all required approvals to permit a
construction start as soon as possible yet this fall. We
request your assistance and that of other City staff,
Planning Commission and Council members in expediting the
approva o ese app , • _ -
business growth facility expansion can be accommodated in
Mounds View Business Park. As you know, tax increment
financing negotiations for this project are ongoing and
will, hopefully be successfully completed in the near
future.
We look forward to working with you on the enclosed Planning
Applications. Multi-Tech and Everest representatives are
prepared to meet with you at your convenience for plan
review. Please feel free to call Scott Wylie at Multi-Tech,
the project architect Scott Nelson (871-6009) , or me if you
have any questions concerning the applications or plan
submittals.
2O85 Long Loki.Road
1'().ho,,132'9_'•ko.pvtlIE'.NtN 7;111
Paul Harrington
October 29 , 1993
Page Two
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
EVEREST DEVELOPMENT, LTD.
Timothy J. Nelson
Enclosures
cc: Scott Wylie
Scott Nelson
TJN/jk
Planning Application for
Multi-Tech Systems, Inc.
Facility Expansion
Submitted October 29, 1993
Introduction
The following narrative materials and information are
submitted to supplement the plans and Planning Application
submitted October 29 , 1993 concerning the proposed Multi-Tech
Systems, Inc. facility expansion in Mounds View Business Park.
In connection with the proposed expansion, Applicant Multi-
Tech Systems, Inc. , is requesting General Concept and
Development Stage Planned Unit Development approvals for the
project, and rezoning of the expansion site from B-3 , Highway
Commercial, to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D. ) .
Project Summary
The proposed Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. facility expansion
includes a 59 , 970 square foot two-story brick building
addition to be constructed principally on the west end of the
existing Multi-Tech Systems facility at 2205 Woodale Drive,
and associated parking and site improvements. The
architectural style, building materials, landscape treatment
and intended uses of the proposed addition are all designed to
compliment and mirror the existing Multi-Tech facility.
Multi-Tech Systems is a leading manufacturer of computer
modems and related communications devices and is the leading
employer in the City of Mounds View with 300 current
employees. The proposed facility expansion is desig--ned to
-• • tinuin• busienss
growth and development in a high-image corporate headquarters
facility.
The expansion facility will be built by Everest Construction
Company, for ownership by Multi-Tech Systems, Inc.
DEVELOPMENT TEAM
APPLICANT/DEVELOPER: Multi-Tech Systems, Inc.
PROPERTY OWNER: . Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. , and
Commercial Property Investments, Inc.
SITE PLANNING Dovolis, Johnson & Ruggieri, Inc.
m. _ -
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Dovolis, Johnson & Ruggieri, Inc.
CIVIL ENGINEER: Putnam Consultants, P.A.
SURVEYOR: All Metro Development Consultants,
P.A.
GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Everest Construction Company
REAL ESTATE BROKER: Nielsen and Associates Realty, Inc.
LEGAL COUNSEL: James Lockhart (CPI)
Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Doty, Ltd.
Lawrence Brynestad (Multi-Tech)
Jensen & Swanson, P.A.
mvapp
multi-tech floppy
DEVELOPMENT TEAM CONTACT INFORMATION
DEVELOPER: Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. .
2205 Woodale Drive
Mounds View, MN 55112
785-3500
785-3515 (fax)
Contact: Scott Wylie
PROPERTY OWNER/ Commercial Property Investments, Inc.
SELLER: 2685 Long Lake Road
Rosevi e, 'I'
636-5500
636-0183 (fax)
Contact: Tim Nelson or Rob Davidson
SITE PLANNING Dovolis, Johnson & Ruggieri, Inc.
& ARCHITECTURE: 1121 East Franklin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55404
871-6009
871-1746 (fax)
Contact: Scott Nelson
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Dovolis, Johnson & Ruggieri, Inc.
1121 East Franklin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55404
871-6009
871-1746 (fax)
Contact: Scott Nelson
CIVIL ENGINEER: Putnam Consultants, P.A.
7441 Jolly Lane
Brooklyn Park, MN 55428
425-1233
425-2033 (fax)
Contact: Dave Putnam
SURVEYOR: All Metro Development Consultants,
P.A.
7111 West Broadway
Suite 201
Brooklyn Park, MN 55428
566-8487
566-8517 (fax)
GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Everest Construction Company
2685 Long Lake Road
Roseville, MN 55113
636-5500
636-0183 (fax)
Contact: Rick Anderson or Rick Baker
DEVELOPMENT TEAM CONTACT INFORMATIONT (contd.)
REAL ESTATE BROKER: Nielsen and Associates Realty, Inc.
2685 Long Lake Road
Roseville, MN 55113
636-5500
636-0183 (fax)
Contact: Rob Davidson
LEGAL COUNSEL: James Lockhart (CPI)
Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Doty, Ltd.
3300 Piper Jaffray Tower
222 South Ninth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
333-4800
334-2781 (fax)
Lawrence Brynestad (Multi-Tech)
Jensen & Swanson, P.A.
8525 Edinbrook Crossing
Suite 201
Brooklyn Park, MN 55443
424-8811
493-5193 (fax)
Legal Description of Property
P. I .N. 08-30-23-42-0001 and 08-30-23-42-0012 :
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of
the Southeast Quarter lying northeasterly of U. S. Highway No.
10 , and the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter, all in Section 8 , Township 30 , Range 23 ,
Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the United States
Government Survey thereof.
ee .., - . . • _ - -
Contract for Deed Purchaser:
Commercial Property Investments, Inc.
P. I .N. 08-30-23-31-0001 (part of) :
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of
the Southwest Quarter of Section 8 , Township 30 , Range 23 ,
Ramsey County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at
the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of Section 8 ;
thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 37 seconds East, assumed
bearing, 525. 42 feet along the east line of said Southwest
Quarter to a point on the north line of Trunk Highway No. 10 ;
thence North 49 degrees 24 minutes 47 seconds West 105 . 00 feet
along said north line; thence North 40 degrees 35 minutes 13
seconds East 30 . 32 feet; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 37
seconds West 217 . 66 feet; thence North 12 degrees 59 minutes
23 seconds East 133 . 36 feet; thence North 00 degrees 00
minutes 37 seconds West 86. 77 feet to a point on the north
line of said Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 26
minutes 01 seconds East 30. 00 feet along said north line to
the-point-of-beginning, Ramsey county, Minnesota.
Fee Owner: Commercial Property Investments, Inc.
P. I .N. 08-30-23-42-0011:
Lot 2 , Block 1, Mounds View Business Park 2nd Addition
Fee Owner: Multi-Tech Systems, Inc.
Existing Site Conditions
The Multi-Tech expansion site consists of approximately 12 .19
acres of land, exclusive of County Road H-2 right-of-way,
with approximately 870 feet of frontage on the north side of
Highway 10 and approximately 650 feet of frontage on the south
side of County Road H-2 . Added to the existing Multi-Tech
site of approximately 5. 68 acres, the total expanded Multi-
Tech site will be approximately .17 . 87 acres in area.
e expansion s e •• • - -• •• •
residential properties to the north. To the east, the site is
bordered by Woodale Drive and Buildings E (Multi-Tech Systems)
and F within the Mounds View Business Park. Bordering the
site on the south is Trunk Highway 10, and to the west is the
Saturn automobile dealership.
The site also contains, in the southeast corner, Pond "C" , an
aesthetic and storm water drainage pond installed during the
development of Phase I of Mounds View Business Park. This
pond, approximately 1. 5 acres in surface area, was sized,
engineered, and located to handle all the drainage from the
subject site, in addition to some of the drainage from
developed properties to the east. The pond is subject to an
existing drainage easement.
The site slopes slightly in a north to south direction and has
been the subject of engineered filling to bring the site up to
the approximate grades of adjacent developed properties.
Current zoning of the expansion site is B-3 , Highway
Commercial. The existing Multi-Tech building site is zoned
P.U. D.
SiteAccessibility
Primary access to the Multi-Tech expansion site will be via
the existing driveways and curb cuts from Woodale Drive
serving the existing Multi-Tech building. This access
provides full site ingress and egress at the Woodale Drive
intersection with Highway 10. No additional direct access
from Highway 10 is currently planned for the proposed
expansion. One driveway access point is proposed at County
Road H-2 in the northern area of the site, for automobile
traffic only. All truck traffic serving the Multi-Tech
expansion site will enter and leave the site via Woodale Drive
and Highway 10 .
Site Development Plan -
P.U.D. Concept and Development Stage
Site planning for the proposed Multi-Tech expansion is driven
by the desire to maintain the high corporate image of the
existing Multi-Tech facility, with the addition to be
consistent with the existing building in architectural style,
building materials, and landscape treatment. The proposed
addition would extend westerly approximately 160 feet from the
west wall of the existing building, taking advantage of the
excellent visibility and exposure to Highway 10 , with views
overloo ing e pon•ing 0 -- -
Highway 10 and Woodale Drive.
The total floor area of the addition is 59 , 970 square feet,
consisting of a small (3 , 500 square foot) single level
addition in the truck dock area at the northeast corner of the
building, and a two-level . west addition with 28 , 299 square
feet on the first floor and 28 , 171 square feet on the second
floor. The addition represents an 81% expansion of the
existing building floor area of 73 , 724 square feet, for an
expanded total building area of 133 , 694 square feet. The
building elevations feature continuation of the double banded
window pattern of the existing building, with the addition of
a second two-story sky-lit atrium entrance symetrical with and
identical to the main entry of the existing building.
The existing building is served by 268 parking stalls. The
proposed building addition will require the removal of 101
stalls . Construction of 346 new parking stalls will result in
a net gain of 245 stalls serving the addition. Total parking
spaces available after the addition will be 513 stalls, for a
ratio of 4 . 26/1, 000.
Site landscaping is to be provided consistent with the
existing Multi---Tech site and the remainder of Mounds View
Business Park. The landscaping includes a variety of
evergreen and ornamental species to provi.e ye- •• • • •
The landscaped berm constructed along County Road H-2 as part
of the Phase I development will be continued along the
northern portion of the Multi-Tech expansion site. Site
drainage will be handled by catch basins in the paved areas
and piping to the existing drainage pond in the southeast
corner of the site. Delivery service to the building will
continue to be provided at truck docks located at the
northeast corner of the existing building. The east wall of
this dock area will be moved approximately 45 feet further
east to allow for a 3 , 500 square foot expansion of the
receiving area. No additional truck docks are proposed to be
installed with the addition.
Other Public Decisions/Approvals Necessary
for Implementation of Proposed P.U.D. Plan
Rezoning of Acquisition Site from B-3, Highway Commercial,
to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.)
The so-called "Waste" property which Multi-Tech intends to
acquire from Commercial Property Investments, Inc. , to
accommodate its expansion is currently zoned B-3 , Highway
Commercial. Applicant requests that the acquisition/expansion
site be rezoned from B-3 to Planned Unit Development (P.U. D. )
accommodate A• •licant's intended use of the property for
office, manufacturing/production, an• •is �� �- •
warehousing. This requested rezoning is consistent with
Applicant's use of its existing building at 2205 Woodale
Drive, and with the current P.U.D. zoning in place for said
property and the other developed properties within Mounds View
Business Park.
Tax Increment Financing Approval
Applicant acknowledges the separate application for "Pay-as-
You-Go" Tax Increment Financing assistance submitted by
Everest Development, Ltd. , in connection with Applicant's
proposed expansion. Applicant acknowledges that approval of a
tax increment financing agreement between the City and
Applicant and/or Everest Development, Ltd. , will be required
to proceed with Applicant's proposed expansion.
Building Area Summary (in Square Feet)
Second Gross
Building Floor Floor
Building Footprint Area Area
Existing Multi-Tech 52 , 156 21, 568 73 , 724
Proposed Addition 31 , 799 28 , 171 59 , 970
Totals 83 , 955 49 , 739 133 , 694
Land Allocation and Coverage Calculations
Multi-Tech Existing Site:
Approximate Site Area 247 , 518
Building Footprint Area 52 , 156
Building to Land Coverage: 21%
Parking and Drive Area 114 , 016
(46%)
Surfaced Area of Site 166, 172
(67%)
Open Space and Green Area 81, 346
(33%)
Combined Existing and Expansion Multi-Tech Sites:
Approximate Site Area
(excluding County Road H-2 841, 628
right-of-way)
Building Footprint Area 83 , 955
Building to Land Coverage: 10%
Parking and Drive Areas 212 , 568
(25%)
Surfaced Area of Site 296 , 523
(35%)
Open Space-&-Green-Area 545, 105
(65%)
Maintenance of Common Open Spaces
The Multi-Tech expansion site will include common open spaces
(e.g. parking, driveways and landscaped green areas) that will
be owned, cared for and maintained by Multi-Tech Systems,
Inc. , as the property owner. The site will also include the
existing Pond "C" drainage pond which will continue to serve
the Multi-Tech property and other adjoining properties, to be
maintained by Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. , . as owner, subject to
the existing Pond Maintenance and Assessment Agreement of
record.
Phasing Schedule
The Multi-Tech Systems expansion project is proposed for
construction commencing fall, 1993 , as soon as necessary
project approvals can be obtained, with completion by spring,
1994 .
16.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section:
(DUN 93-1002WS
STAFF REPORT Report Number:
Ilif
December 6, 1993 Report Date: 12-2-93
AGENDA SESSION DATE
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Discussion of Planning Commission Recommendation Regarding Car Lots
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
'SUMMARY;
At the direction of the City Council, Staff brought the issue of Car Lots
as an allowable use in the City to the Planning Commission for discussion
and recommendation. Following discussion at the November 17, 1993 Planning
Commission meeting, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 373-93
at their December 1, 1993 Regular meeting.
The Resolution recommends that the Council establish a moratorium on the
establishment of any new Car Lots in the City for a period of 18 months.
This moratorium would allow the Planning Commission and City Council time
to further review the subject and consider the forthcoming recommendations
of the Focus 2000 Issue Groups. Please note that the Resolution does not
recommend limiting the expansion of Car Lots which are currently licensed
to operate in the City.
Staff awaits Council direction on this matter.
Paul Harrington, CitSr P-1-an-ne-r - —
jIECOMMENDATIONz
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 373-93
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A MORATORIUM ON NEW
AND USED CAR LOTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
WHEREAS, at the direction of the City Council, the
Mounds View Planning Commission has conducted an in-depth review
of the requirements for establishment of new and used car lots
within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission review included review
of Chapters' 40, 59 and 109 of the Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that
there exists a need for further review and possible amendment of
the existing regulations governing the operation of new and used
car lots within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recognizes the fact
that groups have been formed as part of the FOCUS 2000 project to
study issues that are facing the City including land use and
business establishment; and
WHEREAS, the findings of these study groups may provide
direction for both the Planning Commission and City Council on
issues of land use within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission wishes to incorporate
these—findings—in their further review of the new and used car
lot issue.
•
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
Planning Commission recommends the placement of an 18 month
moratorium on the establishment of additional new and used car
lots within the City of Mounds View.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
does not intend this moratorium to prevent the continuance of or
the expansion of currently licensed new and used car lots within
the City.
Resolution No. 373-93
Page Two
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council
prior to approval of the minutes.
Adopted this 1st day of December, 1993 .
ATTEST:
Chairman
(SEAL)
Planner
OUNDS
nrior
BMREQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 17
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 93-1004WS
12-2-93 Report Date:
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993
DISPOSITION
Item Description: „
Review of "Snow and Ice Control Policy
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this reportIN--
-
Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
Staff would like to review the current "Snow and Ice Control Policy"
(copy attached) , i.e. , repair of boulevards in the spring and sanding
procedures in the winter with the City Council.
/ - Z/t_J
Mike U rich, Public Wor S rvisor
RECOMMENDATION;
SNOW AND ICE CONTROL POLICY
DETERMINATION OF NEED AND INTRODUCTION
The City of Mounds View has determined that it is in the best
interests of the residents for the City to assume basic
responsibility for control of snow and ice on streets under the
jurisdiction of the City. Appropriate snow and ice control is
necessary for emergency services as well as routine travel .
Providing this service in a cost effective manner is a
discretionary decision of the City Council . Previously the City
contracted with Ramsey County for these services; due to concerns
with the cost effectiveness of contracting as well as timeliness
of service, the City will now use City emp oyees an. equipmen o
provide this service. Therefore; this policy is needed to provide
direction for these operations and guidelines for employees and
residents based on available resources.
The City of Mounds View has approximately 39 miles of streets
under its jurisdiction. These are primarily local streets serving
residential needs. In addition, Ramsey County has jurisdiction
over approximately 11 miles of collector and arterial roads
within the City. Trunk Highway 10 and is under jurisdiction of
the Minnesota Department of Transportation . This policy is
intended to provide guidelines for snow and ice control
operations for streets under the City's jurisdiction only. Some
sidewalks adjacent to County Roads are also covered by this
policy.
COMMENCEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Snow and/or ice control operations shall commence under the
direction of the Public Works Foreman. In his absence the police
officer on duty and the public works standby man will consult and
determine when and what operations to begin.
The basisof dispatch calling the standby person to start
operations shall be as follows. Snow accumulation of 2" with
con inui : - .1 . • - 0 ; ;- - -
Drifting of snow may warrant commencement of partial or full
operations dependent on conditions . Icing of pavements may
warrant partial or full operations dependent on extent and
conditions . The Foreman shall determine the time to start
operations and the extent of operations.
The Foreman shall prepare weekly crew assignments and shift
assignments for personnel not on standby duty. Storms forecast
for late afternoon or evening hours may be the basis for the
Foreman splitting a. shift and sending crew(s) home for call out
later in the evening. Morning storms likewise may be the basis
for requesting crew(s) to report at later than normal hours.
1
SUSPENSION OF OPERATIONS
Operations shall continue until all roads are passable. Widening
and clean up operations may continue immediately or the following
working day dependent on conditions . Operations may also be
suspended during periods of limited or zero visibility . Any
decision to suspend operations shall be made by the supervisor on
duty and shall be based on conditions of the storm.
PLOW ROUTES AND SEQUENCING
There are city streets, public sidewalks, public parking lots,
and ice rinks under the City's jurisdic ' on which are affected by
this policy. All City streets will be assigned to a route.
Sidewalks along collector streets, and sidewalks serving public
facilities shall be cleared. by City forces after street routes
are completed. City parking lots and ice rinks shall also be
cleared after street routes have been completed. The attached map
shall indicate plow routes and sidewalks, parking lots and ice
rinks designated to be cleared.
The Public Works Foreman has the responsibility of determining
plow routes and sequencing of operations . The routes and
sequencing shall be indicated on the route map. This map shall be
adopted by the City Council and shall not be altered without
consultation and approval of Council. The Foreman shall retain
latitude to adjust sequencing or route assignments based on storm
conditions , equipment availability , and/or other conditions
warranting changes.
Priority locations are indicated on the route map. These
locations are of public interest and may be given higher priority
for response dependent on the time of day or other circumstance.
These areas include the City Hall complex, schools , and
locations of public interest.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
The intention of this policy is to provide safe winter driving
conditions appropriate for the type of travel necessary on the
City's streets. The level of service described herein shall be
considered a guideline with the understanding that during and
immediately after a storm the level of service provided may be
less than described herein and may vary across the City dependent
on storm conditions. Streets shall be plowed and/or sanded to
provide intermittent bare pavement and sanded intersection
approaches and curves. Cul-de-sacs and dead end streets may have
few if any bare pavement spots. Gravel and dirt road surfaces
shall be plowed to provide a hard pack surface with sand and/or
abrasives spread as necessary for traction . A minimum of
chemicals will be used to achieve the conditions stated and to
provide workable stock piles of sand and/or abrasives.
2
During light to normal snowfalls, streets will be plowed full
width on the initial pass. During heavier snowfalls, streets
shall be plowed as wide as possible initially and widened as the
storm intensity lessens . After the storm passes , clean up
operations shall begin to clear intersections and snow storage
areas along corners and boulevards. It is the City's intent to
complete initial plowing and widening operations within 12 hours
of the cessation of the storm. Clean up operations should be
complete within 24 hours for light snowfalls, and within 48 hours
for heavy snowfalls. Major blizzards may require additional time.
PARKING RESTRICTIONS
On street parking is not compatible with efficient snow plow
opera 10 . - - . . - . . - - - -
periods create problems for snow plowing as well as safety
problems with packed snow and ice around the vehicle. Ticketing
and/or towing of these vehicles may occur in conformance with
city code. Additionally, after large accumulations of snow the
City may find it advisable to proscribe parking restriction to
facilitate plowing and clean-up operations. In this event the
Clerk-Administrator in consultation with council members shall
determine the appropriate restriction and announce the
restriction(s) through the media. These restriction may include
odd/even side parking prohibitions or even complete parking
prohibitions for certain streets.
PROPERTY DAMAGE
Snow plowing and ice control operations can cause property damage
even under the best of circumstances and carefulness on the part
of the operators. The major types of damage are to improvements
in the Right-of-Way and landscape damage. it is appropriate to
specify when this damage shall be the responsibility of the City,
and when it shall be the responsibility of the resident.
Improvements in the Right-of-Way include mail boxes, planter
boxes, lighting fixtures, and irrigation systems. These items
have been placed in the City's property, in--most instances,
• . - H . ' 00 . . the Cit . Mail boxes and
similar objects are quite often obvious and easy to avoid. Low
structures and irrigation systems are impossible to be aware of
after a. storm. Therefore; we have made stakes available to
residents which they can use to identify low and underground
structures.
We recommend the City accept liability for structures which are
obvious or are marked and which have been damaged by physically
being struck by a plow blade or other piece of equipment. Mail
boxes , lights , etc . should be constructed sturdy enough to
withstand snow rolling off a plow or wing. Therefore, damage
resulting from snow is the responsibility of the resident. Items
which have not been staked in accordance with City policy are
3
also the responsibility of the resident.
The City will repair, replace, or reimburse the resident in those
instances where the City is liable. The City will have the choice
of whether to repair or replace; and will only reimburse the cost
of materials in instances where it is in the. City's best
interest. Lawn damage will be repaired by top dressing and
seeding. In no case will the City undertake or pay for sodding.
In instances where the resident and the Public Works Department
disagree about the source of damage and the responsibility
therefore ,. the Clerk-Administrator will determine the issue .
Appeals of his decision will be handled by the City Council .
RESPONSIBILITI •
Snow storms create numerous problems and inconveniences. This
policy has identified streets, sidewalks, parking lots, and ice
rinks that the City will clear. The residents also have certain
responsibilities. These include clearing their own driveways and
private sidewalks, clearing areas for trash cans, clearing areas
around mail boxes and/or newspaper delivery tubes, and clearing
around fire hydrants adjacent to their property. These areas
should be cleared without depositing any snow onto the streets.
There must also be no large piles which obstruct vision of
driveways or walks. Trash cans must not be placed on the street
surfaces. In the case of clearing fire hydrants, the City will
consider clearing these for residents not physically able to do
so. Residents must request this service form the Public Works
Foreman, and the Foreman shall determine who is eligible.
Should the City need to clear away tall piles of snow for safe
sight distance at driveways or walks, the resident responsible
may be billed at overtime rates for this work. The city will not
clear private drives or walks except in emergency situations as
determined by the Clerk-Administrator.
Snow plowing operations can cause additional snow to be deposited
in driveway approaches and around roadside obstacles. Operators
are instructed toattempt to—minimize—these—incidents, butitis
not practical to eliminate this situation. Residents should be
aware that they may have to clear their driveways a second time
after their street has been plowed. Only in extraordinary
circumstances will the City consider clearing driveway
approaches, and this will only be done at the authorization of
the Clerk-Administrator.
COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Complaintsregarding snow and ice control or damage shall be
taken during normal working hours and handled in accordance with
the City's normal complaint procedure. High priority complaints
( those involving access to property or problems requiring
immediate attention ) shall be handled on a priority basis .
Response time should not exceed 24 hours for any complaint. It
4
should be understood that complaint responses are to insure that
the provisions of this policy have been fulfilled and that all
residents of the City have been treated uniformly. Complaints
regarding the provisions of this policy may not be satisfied with
the initial response. It is the City's intention to log all
complaints and upgrade this policy as necessary and in
consideration of the constraints of our resources.
5
Die.(ember �, lg93
AGENDA
DECEMBER 6, 1993
COUNCIL WORK SESSION
7:00 P.M.
Discussion with Representative Geri Evans Regarding 1994 Legislative
Priorities (Samantha Orduno)
2. Chris Graham - Brooklyn Park Housing Department (Mary Saarion)
3. Discussion on 1994 Budget (Don Brager)
General Fund
Enterprise Funds
AGENDA
PAGE TWO
DECEMBER 6, 1993
4, 1993 Budget Adjustments - (Samantha Orduno) - Info to be provided Monday
evening.
5. 1994 Schedule of Fees and Charges - (Samantha Orduno)
6. Update on Golf Course Bond Sale - (Samantha Orduno)
7. Discussion Regarding Delinquent Accounts Receivable (Samantha Orduno)
8. Update on the November 1, 1993 Discussions with Ramsey County
Commissioner Wedell (Mary Saarion, Mike Ulrich and Paul Harrington)
Relocation of Compost Site
Preliminary Estimate on City Plowing/Sweeping County Roads
Realignment of Old 8 and County Road H
AGENDA
PAGE THREE
DECEMBER 6, 1993
9. Discussion Regarding Contract for Animal Control (Tim Ramacher)
10. Recommendation from Park and Recreation Commission Regarding Park
Dedication Fees for Everest's Proposed Bldgs. M and N (Mary Saarion)
(Information to be provided Monday evening.)
11. Purchase of Engine Analyzer (Mike Ulrich)
12. Consideration of Establishment of a Petty Cash Fund (Don Brager)
AGENDA
PAGE FOUR
DECEMBER 6, 1993
13. Discussion of Greenfield Ponds Development Agreement (Paul Harrington)
14. Discussion of Off -Street Parking Plan for Robert's Off 10 (Paul Harrington)
15. Discussion of Request for Rezoning and Development Review, Multi-Tech/Everest
(Paul Harrington)
16. Discussion of Planning Commission Recommendation Regarding Car Lots (Paul
Harrington)
17. Review of Snow and Ice Control Policy (Mike Ulrich)
AGENDA
PAGE FIVE
DECEMBER 6, 1993
18. Council/Staff Expectations (per Councilmember Quick)
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Agenda Section: 1—
STAFF REPORT Report Number: 91-643WS___
AGENDA SESSION DATE._
December 6, 1993 Report Date: __12-I-93 ..__
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Discussion with Representative Geri Evans Regarding 1994 Priorities
Administrator's RevieudRecommendntion:
No conunents to supplement this report Jq_
Conunrms attached. _ �V1
Eg98m;ufon'Summary munch supplement sheets as necessary.l
RI IMMAIM
Representative Geri Evans will be present at the December 6, 1993 Work
Session to discuss the council's Legislative Issues which were formulated
at the November 1, 1993 Work Session.
Attached please find the letter that was sent to Representative Evans which
summarized the list of issues and concerns discussed at the last Work
Session.
c
City Adminis r
MMAN ADTnATION:
November 29, 1993
The Honorable Geri Evans
State office Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Dear Representative Geri Evans;
The purpose of this letter is to confirm your attendance at the
Mounds View City Council's December 6, 1993 Work Session and to
thank you for taking the time to meet with the Council and Staff to
discuss the issues of concern to the City of Mounds View.
At the Council's November 1, 1993 Work Session, the Council
developed a list of legislative priorities which they consider to
be important for Mounds View in the 1994 Legislative Session. The
list includes the following issues:
* Increasing the filing fee and requirements for elective office
* Limitations on the DNR permits to remove water from area lakes
* Amendment of the Human Rights Law to provide law enforcement
officers more discretionary authority over lawful stops.
* Amendment to the MSA allotment procedures which currently
require cities to construct roadways according to standards
which may not be appropriate to a particular city and also
allow cities to spend MSA money on any road in the city.
* Additional restrictions on agricultural peddlers in a city.
Several of these peddlers pose many problems for the City,
yet we are not permitted to establish fees to offset the
cost of enforcement of our laws.
* Improved coordination of responsibilities regarding inspections
of manufactured home parks.
* Repeal of the State imposed sales tax on cities
* A realistic, reasonable and truly informative Truth In Taxation
Law which recognizes the budgetary process of cities and does
not present misleading information to residents many months
before a city's budget is completed.
REPRESENTATIVE GERI EVANS
PAGE TWO
NOVEMBER 29, 1993
* Restructuring of the property tax formula - residential
properties are absorbing more of the tax burden due to the
tax shift from C/I properties. Also, there needs to be an
reviewal of County assessment practices. Values a:e often not
consistent within and across city boundaries; and, to
frequently, the values established are too high for a property
owner to absorb in a one year cycle.
* Clarification of the restrictions on employee use of city -owned
vehicles
* No reopener of Pay Equity
* Define timeline and funding for the turnback of County roads to
municipalities
* Examination of Minnesota cities liabilities under the Super
Fund law and related state statutes. Cities need help from
the potentially devastating results of landfill litigations.
* Restructuring of the Tax Increment Law to remove restrictions
which are hindering cities' ability to attract and retain
an industrial/commercial base.
* A commitment, through legislative action, which places no
additional
unfunded mandates on cities and examine the need for current
mandates with a goal of removal of some mandates by the next
legislative session.
* Establishment of qualifications for all charter commission
members as well as a better system for appointments.
* Stricter State Nuisance Ordinance and opportunities for cities
to establish stricter code enforcement procedures.
As you can see, the City Council is very interested in discussing
ideas which address a comprehensive and important spectrum of
social and political issues. The City of Mounds View is confident
that by establishing an open and on -going dialogue with our elected
officials and sharing with them the City's concerns, the City of
Mounds View will be an important instrument for positive change in
the Metropolitan area.
It is always a pleasure to see you and we all look forward to our
meeting with you on December 6, 1993, 7:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of the Mounds View City Hall.
Sincerely,
Samantha Orduno
City Administrator
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA SESSION DATE. December 6, 1993
DISPOSITION
Itern Description: Chris Graham - Brooklyn Park Housing Department
Administrators Revit-w/Recnmmendation:
No convnents to supplement this report �—
Comments attnelu•d.
F.xplanutiun'Sumntaryy (attach supplement sheets a% necessary.)
SIIDIM1 AIM
Agenda Secdon: 2.
Report Number: 93-694WS
Report Date: 12-1-93
At an earlier Work Session meeting the Council expressed interest
in learning more about the work that Brooklyn Park has done with
screening rental tenants in their city. At the council's request
I called Brooklyn Park for more information and was introduced to
Chris Graham, Housing Director. She is a wealth of information
and felt that the appropriate group to share information with is
the City Council. Without hesitation she agreed to come to this
work session to share her information and answer any questions
that the Council may have regarding this issue.
Chris Graham has been the driving force in coordinating a
property managers group that meets on a monthly basis. The
meetings include networking and getting to know each other as
well as guest speakers who offer information such as third party
screening, setting standards for people to abide by, screening
advantages, and how to go about obtaining references on potential
tenants, school district information, parks information and other
information that would be conducive to rental agencies in their
business of selling rental space.
Chris has great interest in this project. She has been working
with the property managers in the City of Brooklyn Park for
approximately 5 years and has seen many other cities follow suit.
Her dream is to form a Metro Area property managers group. Chris
has spoken with many city councils in the metropolitan area and
sees the work session as a great opportunity to meet with the
Mounds view City Council.
Saarinn, Ifl rector of Parks, Recreation and Forestry
Rini' )NIMFNI)A'1'U)N:
Agenda Section: 2.
RE(�UEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Reparc Number: 93-594W5
n STAFF REPQRT 12-1-93
AGENDA SESSION DATE December , 1993
Report Date: _
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Chris Graham — Brooklyn Park Housing Department
Administrators Review/Recommendation:
. No comments to supplement this rep art
Comments attached.
EsplanatiOreSummary (attach supplement sheen as necessary.)
EUDIMAIM
At an earlier Work Session meeting the council
Pexpresarksedone interest
in learning more about the work that Brooklyn
screening rental tenants in their city. At the with
Coun. tro request
i called Brooklyn Park for more informahe is tion
n and was inform
Chris Graham, Houthe appropriate group to share information with is
and felt that the aWi P
the City Council. Without hesitation she agreed to cometo this
work session to share her information an
dianswer any qu5
that the Council may have regarding
this Chris Graham has been the driving force in coordinating a
The
property managers group that meetbasis.
s on a monthly
meetings include networking and getting to know each other as
well as guest speakers who offer information
to abide by, screenthird ing
screening, setting standards for people potential
advantages, and how to go about obtaining references on
tenants, school dis-rict information, parks informates in their
ion and other
information that would be conducive to rental agenci
business of selling rental space.
Chris has great interest in this project. She has been working
with the property managers in the City of Brooklyn Park for
approximately 5 years and has seen many other cities follow Chris
Her dream is to form a Metro Area property managers group.
has spoken with many city councils iortunityttopmeet ae withthend
sees the work session as a great opportunity
Mounds View City Council.
ion,, -Director of Parks,
12C 'Ot1\1R`Ih\'CU1N:
try
HAND CARRIED TO DECEMBER 6, 1993 AGENDA SESSION
Iih.QUE,S'1' IC OR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agendn Section: ----
STAFF REPORT Report Number:nV _
AGENDA SESSION DATE. DECEMBER 6, 1933 Report Date: 12/06/93
DISPOSITION
Ittmll.strtl"nn 1993 BUDGET ROLLOVERS
Adntinistr:nnrs Rmiew/Reminim-ndntion:
. No cunmu•nts to supplonmmt this report
. Cnnuoenls nttnchrd.
lispinnnliun'Sununnrr attach supplement sheetn ns nowssnty.l
SUDIDIt RT:
At the end of 1992 when the 1993 Budget was adopted, the City had not yet
finalized plans to remodel and expand the City Hall building. Because of
the uncertainty regarding any possible expansion plans, staff included
several City Hall capital equipment items in the Long Term financial Plan
and the 1993 Budget which would now be more prudent to purchase in 1994 in
conjunction with the expansion. The items include:
$ 2,500 Tables and Chairs for Lower Level Kitchen
3,000 Folding Chairs
2,000 Lateral Files
2,000 Office Equipment
1,000 Table
17,600 Audio visual
$ 28,100
* The total project cost includes the $12,600 budgeted in 1993 and the
$5,000 grant from the Cable Commission. The total amount would need
to be "rolled over" into 1994 Central Services (formally called City
Hall) capital 100-4190-703.
It is unusual that the need exists to roll over into the next year so many
items from the previous year. However, the City Hall project represents an
unusual circumstance. Staff was asked to critically assess all capital
expenditures to determine the benefits of delayed purchases in coordination
with the expansion project and the eventual reallocation of space and
equipment needs.
It must be noted that the roll over amounts will lessen the monies
available for any end -of -the -year deficits.
staff is requesting that the total amount stated above be "rolled over"
into the 1Q94 for Central Services capital expenditures.
Samantha Ordt;no, City Administrator
NOV 29 '93 13:12
Spons Event Development Morkeling produdan
LIw 'r l YF= .IY
TO: Mary Sarian July 14, 1993
City of Mounds View Park & Rec Page 1 of 1
FROM: Mike Walston
WCN Sports Nets
RE: Quote for Ballfield Barrier Netting
P.1
Job Description: To provide and install baseball barrier netting 20' high and
1181, 7" long to be erected on top of a pre-existing, 15' high -chain link fence
backstop.
Materials: - #36 or 021 nylon knotted netting, weather -treated (black);
- (4) 42' western red cedar poles (class 5)
- 260' of 1/4" galvanized steel aircraft cable for top & bottom
cabling
- Installation hardware: zinc interlocking spring clips;
turnbuckles; galvanized steel eye bolts; wire rope clips
Materials Cost:
$2,527.70
$2,689.70
+ 6.5% MN Sales Tax
164.30
174.83
Shipping (Net)
48.00
57.00
Labor Cost for Pole Setting,
Project Management and
Pole Delivery:
975.00
975.00
Total Estimate:
$3,715.00
$3,896.53
Payment Terms: C.O.D. - Payment is due upon the completion of the barrier
net installation.
ieNOTE: Pole setting portion of estimate is based on the anticipation of no
significant underground impediments to augeri.ng the pole holes. If rock or
other impediments to digging are encountered, any additional augering or
excavation time required and performed by WCN Sports Nets will be billed to the
City of Mounds View at the rate of $100 per has.
Labor portion of estimate is based on the city of Mounds View
providing a lift or aerial bucket adequate for the job, a lift operator and at
least one other worker to work with Mike Walston of WCN Nets on the cabling and
not installation portion of the lob.
15333 Trllllum Clrclo • Edon Pralrle, MN 55344 • (612) 934-3545 Fax (612) 934.3545
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993
DISPOSITION
Item Description: 1993 Budget Adjustments
Administrator's Review/Recommendation: 1W
- No comments to supplement this report --Cf--_
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary hutch supplement sheets as necensary.)
SUAIAIARY:
Agenda Section: 4
Report Number: 93-1003WS
Report Date: 12-9-93_
The Parks, Recreation & Forestry Department is requesting Council
approval to carry over three items budgeted in the 1993 to the
1994 budget. The first is $3,300 which has been received from
the DNR as a grant for planting large trees. This money cannot
be used this year because the planting season is over. However,
if carried over to the 1994 budget trees can be purchased and
planted in the Spring of 1994.
Secondly, $1,500 was unspent in the Recreation Fund because the I
did not attend the National Conference due to time and scheduling
conflicts. However, I would like to carry that money over to
1994 with the intention of purchasing new furniture that the
department is sure to need after the move. A printer table,
shelving, children's table and chairs and two customer chairs are
needed as well as a credenza. Also, the Program Supervisor's
desk and the desk shared by the Forester, our future intern Brad
and April, our school/work student are old, old desks that had
been purchased many years ago from the Army Surplus shop should
be replaced - - with desks that have drawers that actually close
and open without a struggle! The money would be well spent on
much needed furniture.
These two requests for carry-over are from the general fund. My
third request is for carry-over in the Recreation Activity Fund.
Please refer to the separate memo.
i
Mary Saari n)r frlrector of Parks, Recreation and Forestry
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
nV STAFF REPORT
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993
DISPOSITION
Item Description: 1993 @udget Adjustments
Administrator's Review/Recommendntion: /7Ay—
. \o comments to supplement this report
Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary Inttneh suppirment ahceta as neeeasary.)
EV 1MARL
4.
Agenda Section: —
Report Number. 93-1003WS
Report Date: 12-2-93
Budgeted for 1993 were a couple of projects that did not get completed
for various reasons. The first one is restoration of the turf area
around the new water tower. This project was not completed because a
new ballfield was constructed and the city Hall expansion was expected
to begin in the early fall. Funds designated for this project, $7,000,
were for irrigation around the tower and new ballfield.
Another project that was postponed was the construction of material
storage bins inside the Public Works garage area. This was delayed
because of a manpower shortage and the late date in which the remaining
surface in that area was paved.
staff is requesting that $6,400 for the material storage bins (account
#100-4270-703)eand $7,000 for
1994the irrigation system (account 1700-4121-
703) be
Mike Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor
4.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: _ _
STAFF REPO RT Report Numlx r.
93-1003W5
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6. 1993_
Report Date: _ 12-2-93
DISPOSITION
Item Description: 1993 Budget Adjustments
Administrators Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (anach supplement sheet9 as aece990ry.)
auhl fAIM
The Police Department has monies from the 1993 budget that we are
requesting be transferred to the 1994 budget. The requests are as
follows:
1. $4,000 (Account N0.4200-703) to be transferred to the
same 1994 account. This amount was saved because
computer cost less than budgeted and no monies were
spent for office equipment. I would like to spent this
money in the remodeling project.
2. $1,000 (Account No. 4200-362 to be transferred to 1994
(Account No. 4200-513). This amount was saved by not going to
the National Chief's Conference. I would like to spend this
money to repair and paint a squad car (1989 Blazer).
3. $4,000 that was donated by Lion' Club to purchase
MDT's. The MDT was not installed because of the
remodeling project.
Ramacher, Pol
I I I- (' O 1Luau An, 10 N:
ice
4.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: _
Report Number: 93-1003WS
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA SESSION DATE
December 6, 1993 Report Date: 12-2-93
DISPOSITION
Item Description! 1993 Budget Adjustments
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
No comments to supplement this report
Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SIfNINARY:
This item will involve a request by City Staff to roll over into the 1994
Budget funds from the 1993 Budget that, for several reasons, are considered
more cost-efficient and prudent to expend in conjunction with the City Hall
expansion and other activities. This is more of a "housekeeping" item, one
that is consistent with past practices. Specifics of the request will be
provided at the_ meeting Monday night.
l
• •A
0
DISPOSITION
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993
Item Description:
1993 Budget Adjustments
Administrator's Review/Recummendation:
- \a comments to supplement this report
Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
S ]htl MARY:
4.
Agenda Section: ____..._ - -
Report Number: 93-1003W5
Report Date: 12-2-93
Staff is recommending the carry-over of Recreation Activity Funds
for the purchase and installation of netting for Greenfield Park
baseball field. Last summer, 1993 Mike Walston met with Steve
Dazenski, Mary Johnson and me regarding the problems of foul
balls during baseball play at Greenfield Park. Mike worked out a
netting scheme that would include the installation of 4 42' red
cedar poles (class 5) and 260' of galvanized steel aircraft cable
and netting. The netting would be attached with clips that could
be removed during winter months if desired.
Although the netting may not catch every foul ball, it would
provide a catch for those balls that go directing up and over, up
to the 20' over and above the 16 ' high backstop. It is
predicted that 80-90% of the foul balls would be stopped.
Even though this may not be a foolproof remedy for all the foul
balls that occur at Greenfield Park, I do believe that it is a
good faith effort on the part of the City of Mounds View to do
everything possible to try to remedy the problem of foul balls
going into the backyards of residents abutting Greenfield Park.
%la ry
It F(Y)NIMENDA110N:
To approve the use of 1993 Recreation
Activity Funds to carry over to 1994 for the
purpose of purchasing and installing a
netting system at Greenfield Park baseball
field, not to exceed $4,500.
or
tion and Forestry
nV
DISPOSITION
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993
hem Description: 1994 Schedule of Fees and Charges
Administrator's Reviea•/Recnmmendation:
No comments to supplement this repnrt
. Comments attached. ___
F.xpinnation'Summary (ranch supplement sheets as necessary)
SU516 ARy:
Agenda Section: 5.
Report Number: 93-695WS _
Report Date: 12-6-93
In the past, the resolution establishing the license/permit/fee schedule
has been updated periodically, as needed. often times, the revision is in
reaction to legislative or City policy changes.
The last time the resolution was updated and approved by the Council was
May 26, 1992.
In an effort to better coordinate the Schedule with the budget process,
resolutions setting water, sewer, street light and surface water management
rates, Staff is recommending that the resolution establishing the
License/Permit/Fee Schedule be approved prior to the end of each year - in
this case, at the December 13th Council meeting.
The staff has been examining the current license/permit/fee schedule and
has made recommendations for revisions which are consistent with costs and
are also comparable with Metropolitan cities. The Police Department has
recommended changes to the Administrative Offense schedule which are more
consistent with Ramsey County charges.
The recommended changes are underlined on the attached Proposed Schedule.
At
Samantha Or no, Ci y Administrator
RE'COIN4IEN IATI 1N:
all
DISPOSITION
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
. ti DI Cog kv
AGENDA SESSION DATE
Agenda Section:
Report Number:
Report Date:
Item Description: Mounds View fee schedule changes
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
• No comments to supplement this report_
• Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SS 16fMMARYl
Restoration fee
A fee increase is requested for the restoration charge of a water service. This fee is currently $50.00
which covers the labor for locating the resident's water curb box. shutting off the water and turning
it back on. The current amount does not include any administrative costs which include (3) mailing
notices (2 of which are certified). book keeping expenses and many times an officer is sent to the
house to try and deliver a certified letter that was not accepted by normal mail delivery. The proposed
increase is $15.00. making the restoration charge $65.00.
Street Opening Permits
Staff is requesting/recommending that the City repair all street openings. In the past, utility
contractors would estimate the size of an opening and the permit was issued accordingly. A few
instances have occurred when the patch is not constructed properly and the City crews, in the end,
make additional repairs to the patch. several months later, with no compensation. (This is due to
settling, cracking. holding water. etc..) Staff is recommending that the City charge $500.00 to $700.00
to repair the street opening and refund the remaining balance to the contractor. The cost of the repair
will include asphalt, labor. equipment costs and an administrative charge. A typical water/sewer
opening would cost approximately $350.00. (3 man crew at $23.56 per hour each for I hour = $70.68
plus $100.00 for equipment, plus approximately $20.00 per ton for asphalt which covers 4 inch thick,
7 1/2 foot square patch, plus $100.00 administrative charge.) This will ensure a proper repair of the
road and greatly minimize future repairs of the same street opening.
Only in circumstances when multiple openings occur and an inspector is present during the backfilling
and base proportion, will a contractor be allowed to construct installation of the bituminous surface.
i
Michael Ulrich. Public Works Supervisor
RECOMAtEN )ATION:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION;. dU 'agenda Section: 5 •
STEiF'F R �PF ORT 1 ReportMumber: 93-695WS
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 Report Date:
12-6-93
DISPOSITION
Item Description: 1994 Schedule of Fees and Charges
Administrators Review/Recommendation:
• No comments to supplement this report
• Comments attached.
Explanation)Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
¢iJbliyL=
In the past, the resolution establishing the license/permit/fee schedule
has been updated periodically, as needed. Often times, the revision is in
reaction to legislative or City policy changes.
The last time the resolution was updated and approved by the Council was
May 26, 1992.
In an effort to better coordinate the Schedule with the budget process,
resolutions setting water, sewer, street
ttli ht and res lution surface
ewater
management
rates, Staff is recommending
that the
License/Permit/Fee Schedule be approved prior to the end of each year - in
this case, at the December 13th Council meeting.
The staff has been examining the current license/permit/fee schedule and
has made recommendations for revisions which are consistent with costs and
are also comparable with Metropolitan cities. The Police Department has
recommended changes to the Administrative offense schedule which are more
consistent with Ramsey County charges.
The recommended changes are underlined on the attached Proposed Schedule.
Samantha Ordhno, City Administrator
U:,.lMLJN2ATION:
CITY OF
MOUNDS VIEW
PROPOSED
1994
FEE SCHEDULE
Last Revision 5/26/92
Accessory Building
102
Accident Report
79
Addition (First Floor)
102
Addition (Mobile Home)
102
Administrative Offense
101
Agendas
74
Air Conditioning
18
Air Conditioning
102
Amusement Center
67
Amusement Device
67
Amusement Rides
69
Apartment List
110
Apartment Registration
50
Asphalt
3
Assessment Search
72
Attached Garage
102
Basement (Semi -Finished)
102
Basement (Unfinished)
102
Basic Floor Area
102
Billboards
19
Blue Prints
81
Bowling Alley
68
Boxing Permit
71
Buildings
1
Business List, Mounds View
111
Carnivals
69
Carport
102
Circuses
69
City Code Book
77
City Hall Shelter Rental
85
Code Appeal
33
Code Book
77
Community Room Rental
83
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
77
Comprehensive Land Use
Plan Amendment
108
Conditional Use Permit
32
Contractor Licenses
28
Contractor (State)
License Verification
106
Copies
73
Council Meeting Packets
76
Crawl Space
102
Curb Stop Shut Off
45
Deck
102
Detached Garage
102
Development Plan Review
34
Dog Licenses
48
Door and Window Installation
9
Driveway
3
Duct work
20
Electrical Work
89
Elevators
23
Excavating
2
Fans
20
Fence
8
Filing Fee for City Office
78
Filling
2
Fire Sprinkling Permit
16
Fireplace
102
Footings
1
Furnace
20
Garbage Enclosure
10
Garbage Hauler
61
Garage
102
Gas Piping
16
Gasoline Station
62
Grading
2
Half Way House
66
Heating
20
House Permit
102
Hydrant
94
Incinerators
22
Insufficient Funds Check
92
Intoxicating Liquor
51-56
Investigation Fee
56, 64, 106
Kennel License
49
Lakeside Park Rental
84
Late Water Bill (penalty)
43
License Verification
(Contractor)
106
Liquor License
51-60
Load Limits
47
Major Subdivision
36
Maps
81
Meter Reading Card
(Non -Return)
42
Meter Testing
103
Minor Subdivision
35
Minutes
75
Mobile Home Permit
29
Mobile Homes
24
Moving Buildings
14,15
Multiple Dwelling List
110
Multiple Dwelling Registration
50
New Car Sales
63
New Resident List
82
Non -Intoxicating Liquor
57-60
Notary Public
80
NSF Check
92
Office Filing Fee
78
Open Carport
102
Park Dedication Fee
97
Park Shelter Building
84,85
Parking Lot
3
Patio
3
Peddlers License & ID
64
Photocopies
73
Picnic Kit
104
Picnic Shelter
85
Pipe Fitting
16
Plan Check Fee
91
Plan Review
34
Planned Unit Development/
Amendment
107
Planning Sign Deposit
96
Platforms
7
Plumbing
17
Police Report
79
Porch
102
PUD Development/Amendment
107
Raising
13
Recreational Structures
102
Recuperation House
66
Refrigeration
18
Relocation of Building
37
Remodeling
102
Reroof
5
Reshingling
5
Residing
6
Restaurant License
65
Restoration Fee
44
Returned Check
92
Rezoning
30
Road Restriction Permit
47
Rubbish Hauler
61
S.A.C. Charge
86
Sales Tax
93
Satellite Dishes
25
Seating
7
Service Restoration
44
Sewer Availability
Charge (SAC)
86
Sewer Rate
99
Sewer Connection Permit
46
Shed
102
Sheet Metal
21
Shoring
13
Shut Off Fee
45
Sidewalks
3
Sign Code, Copy
77
Signs
19
Sign Permit, Temporary
27
Silver View Park Shelter
Building
84
Sign Deposit, Planning
96
Site Plan Review
34
Solicitors License
64
Special Assessment Search
72
Sprinkler Permit
16
Sprinkling System
102
State License Verification
106
Storage Shed
102
Storm Water Management
87
Street Light Utility
109
Street Opening Permit
70
Structures
1
Stucco
4
Subdivision
35,36
Surcharge
90
Surface Water Management
113
Swimming Pool, Permit Fees
102
Swimming Pools
26
SWM Charge
87
Tapping Water or Sewer Main
100
Tax, Sales
93
Temporary Mobile
Home Permit
29
Temporary Sign Permit
27
Three -Season Porch
102
Transfer of Apartment/Multiple Dwelling
Registration
50
Transient Merchant
64
Tree Removal
95
Unit Charge (Sewer)
88
Used Car Sales
63
Utility Bill
43
Utility (Bill) Search
72
Utility Shed
102
Valuation Table
Page 1
Variance
31
Ventilation
20
Video Tape Copies
105
W.A.C. Charge
39
Water Availability
Charge (WAC)
39
Water Bill (late fee)
43
Water Rate
9
Water Connection Permit
40
Water Hydrant
94
Water Meter
41
Water Quality
114
Testing Charge - MN Dept.
Health
Water Service Restoration
44
Water Shut Off Fee
45
Wetland Alteration Permit
Wood Burning Stove
1$
Wrecking
12
Wrestling Permit
71
Zoning Code, Copy
7
Building Permits (Chapter 59)
Minimum Fee. The minimum fee for all permits shall be $15.00
unless otherwise specified.
Valuation Table. The following Valuation Table shall be used to
determine fees for those permits so indicated below and in all cases
where the work is of such a nature that the permit fees cannot be
determined from the schedule established below for such work.
$1.00 to $500.00
$501.00 to $2,000.00
$15.00 for the first
$500.00 plus $2.00 for each
additional $100.00 or
fraction thereof, to and
including $2,000.00
$2,001.00 to $45.00 for the first
$25,000.00 $2,000.00 plus $9.00 for
each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and
including $25,000.00
$25,001.00 to $252.00 for the first
$50,000.00 $25,000.00 plus $6.50 for
each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and
including $50,000.00
$50,001.00 to $414.50 for the first
$100,000.00 $50,000.00 plus $4.50 for
each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and
including $100,000.00
$100,001.00 to
$500,000.00
$639.50 for the first
$100,000.00 plus $3.50 for
each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof to and
including $500,000.00
$500,001.00 and up $2,039.50 for the first
$500,000.00 plus $3.00 for
each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof
General Construction:
SURCHARGES NOT INCLUDED IN ALL FIGURES LISTED
BELOW (See "Surcharge" for further Information):
buildings, structures, footings - use valuation table
2. excavating, grading, filling - $20.00 plus $2.00 per 1,000
square feet or fraction thereof over the first 1,000 square feet
plus 2.5 times any expense for survey work by the City plus
$.50 surcharge
3, sidewalks, driveway, parking lots, patio (no surcharge) -
$15.00 plus $2.00 per 1,000 square feet or fraction thereof
over 1,000 square feet
4. stucco - $15.00 plus $4.00 per 1,000 square feet or fraction
thereof over 1,000 square feet plus $.50 surcharge
5. reshingling - $15.00 plus $2.00 per 1,000 square feet or
fraction thereof over 1,000 square feet plus $.50 surcharge
6. residing - $15.00 plus $2.00 per 1,000 square feet or fraction
thereof over 1,000 square feet plus $.50 surcharge
7. platforms, seating - $20.00 per platform and $15.00 per
seating unit plus $.50 surcharge
fences (no surcharge) - $20.00 per installation
9. door or window installation using existing window frames - no
fee
door or window installation using existing rough opening but
changing window frames - $15.00 plus $2.00 per window
door or window change in rough opening - use valuation table
10. garbage/recycling enclosure - $20.00 (no surcharge)
11. wood burning stove - use valuation table
12. wrecking - $20.00 plus $2.00 per 1,000 cubic feet or fraction
thereof over 2,000 cubic feet plus $.50 surcharge
13. raising, shoring - use valuation table -see surcharge and plan
check fee for additional charges
14. moving buildings over streets
A. larger than 12' x 24' x 25' other than accessory building
- $110.00 per building plus $.50 surcharge
B. accessory building larger than 12' x 24' x 25'- $ 70.00
per building plus $.50 surcharge
C. smaller than 12' x 24' x 25' - $ 35.00 per building plus
$.50 surcharge
15. moving buildings over private land - $30.00 per building plus
$.50 surcharge
16. Pipe Fitting (plus surcharge)
A. gas, oil piping - use valuation table
B. steam, hot water heating systems - $25.00 plus $5.00
per 100,000 BTU per hour or fraction thereof over
200,000 BTU per hour
C. fire extinguishing equipment
(1) standpipes - $20.00 per standpipe
(2) sprinkler equipment- $30.00 plus $4.00 for each
ten sprinkler heads or fraction thereof over ten
heads
17. Plumbing Work (plus surcharge)
A. plumbing fixture, devices, connections - $15.00 plus
$7.00 per fixture, device and connection
18. Refrigeration Work (plus surcharge)
A. equipment under 100,000 BTU per hour capacity
(12,000 BTU per ton) - $15.00 plus $2.00 per 10,000
BTU per hour or fraction thereof over 10,000 BTU per
hour capacity
B. equipment over 100,000 BTU per hour capacity (12,000
per ton) - $35.00 plus $2.00 per 100,000 BTU per hour
or fraction thereof over 100,000 BTU per hour capacity
19. Signs, Billboards (no surcharge)
A. signs up to 100 square feet 50.00 $35.00 for the first
24 square feet plus $5.00 for each additional 25 square
feet or fraction thereof of to 100 square feet
B. signs 100 square feet and over 75.00 $66.00 for the
first 100 square feet plus $10.00 for each additional 100
square feet or fraction thereof
C. signs: refacing or altering - $20.00 per installation
20. Heating and Ventilation Work (plus surcharge)
A. gas, oil burner equipment - $25.00 plus $5.00 per
100,000 BTU per hour or fraction thereof over 100,000
BTU per hour input (commercial, rooftop units)
B. gravity warm air heating - $35.00 per installation repair,
alteration or extension
C. mechanical warm air heating - $25.00 plus $5.00 per
100,000 BTU per hour or fraction thereof over 200,000
BTU per hour input capacity
D. duct or tin work - Use Valuation Table
E. ventilation systems
(1) using fans less than 100 CFM - $5.00 plus
$2.00 for each fan
(2) using fans more than 100 CFM - $25.00 plus $2.00
per 1,000 CFM or fraction thereof over 3,000 CFM
plus $5.00 for each fan
21. General Sheet Metal Work - Use Valuation Table (plus
surcharge)
22. Incinerators (plus surcharge)
A. domestic portable incinerator - $25.00 per unit
B. commercial, industrial incinerator - $60.00 per unit
23. Elevators, etc. - Use Valuation Table (see surcharge and plan
check fee for additional charges)
24. Installation of Mobile Homes - $35.00 per Installation (plus
$.50 surcharge)
25. Satellite Dishes - $20.00 per Installation (plus $.50 surcharge)
26. Swimming Pools
Filling - $25.00 plus $1.0 15 per 1,000 gallons of water used
Bldg. Permit Valuation Per Square Foot
Above Ground $6.00
Below Ground $20.00
With Decking/Fencing Add: $2.00
See Valuation Table when value has been determined. Also
see surcharge and plan check fee for additional charges.
27. Temporary Signs - $15/21 day period
28. Contractor Licenses (Chapter 60) (see Building Dept.
Procedures Manual for specific license type) - $40/Year
State License Verification Fee - $5.00 per permit
29. Temporary Mobile Home Permit 50 M + $10/Renewal
30. Rezoning - $200/acre, minimum $200, maximum $1,000
31. Variance - R-1 to R-2 - $75, all others $200
32. Conditional Use Permit - R-1 to R-2 - $75, all others $200
33. Code Appeal - $75
34. Development/Site Plan Review - $100/acre, minimum $100,
maximum $500
35. Minor Subdivision - $150
36. Major Subdivision - $250 plus $250.00 deposit
37. Relocation of Building (Chapter 45) - Expenses of Inspection
38. Wetland Alteration Permit (Chapter 48) - $50 plus deposit
determined by Staff
Wetland Buffer Permit - $10.00
39. Water Availability Charge
A. Residential - $200 225 per unit
B. Commercial/Industrial - Larger of $800 900
or 225 $200/36,000 Gallons of Water
Consumption/Quarter
40. Water Connection/Repair Permit
A. Service less than 4 inches - $20 25 + $ 50 Surcharge
B. Service 4 inches or greater -$40 $50 + 50 Surcharge
41. Water Meter - $ 85
42. Non -Return of Meter Reading - W $15.00 Charge
43. Late Payment - 10% of Bill
44. Service Restoration - $50 65
45. Combination Shut Off & Curb Stop - Cost + $25
46. Sewer Connection Re air Permit - $2& $25 + $ 50 Surcharge
47. Waiver of Load Limits (Chapter 80) - $ 20/entry/truck
48. Dog Licenses (decreased by 50% after one year)
A. Spayed or neutered - $ 7/2 Years
B. Unspayed or Unneutered - $13/2 Years
49. Kennel
A. Residential - $ 30/Year
B. Commercial - $ 50/Year
50. Multiple Dwelling Registration - $5/Unit with minimum of
$30/building/year
Transfer - $15.00
Intoxicating Liquor (Chapter 100)
51. On -Sale without Cabaret - $5,000 + $60/100 sq. ft. or part
thereof of public area in excess of 4,000 square feet not to
exceed $10,000/year
52. On -Sale with Cabaret - $5,000 + $85/100 sq. ft. of public area
in excess of 4,000 square feet not to exceed $10,000/Year
53. On -Sale Wine - $800/Year
54. Off -Sale - $200/Year
55. Bottle Club - $330/Year
56. Investigation Fee
wine general liquor
A. Single Person $300 $350
B. Partnership $365 $385
C. Corporation $400 $450
Non -Intoxicating Liquor (Chapter 100) - 3.2 Beer (subject to 10%
late payment fee)
57. On -Sale - $1,000
58. Off -Sale - $100/Year
59. Set Ups - $330/Year
60. Club - $330/Year
61. Garbage and Rubbish Hauler (Chapter 104) - $75 +
$20/Vehicle/Year
(subject to 10% late payment fee)
62. Gasoline Stations (Chapter 106) - $50 + $8 Per Pump
Exceeding 2/Year
(subject to 10% late payment fee)
63. New and Used Car Sales (Chapter 109) - $150/Year
(subject to 10% late payment fee)
64. Peddlers/Transient Merchant (Chapter 110) - $60/day,
$100/month, $500/year, plus $10.00 investigation fee for new
peddler plus $2.50/person for I.D. card
Transient Merchant - $60/day, $100/month, plus $10.00
investigation fee plus $2.50/person for I.D. card
65. Restaurant (Chapter 111)
A. Class A (occupancy load greater than 100)
(1) Operating 16 Hours/Day or Less - $275/Year
(2) Operating More than 16 Hours/Day - $550Near
B. Class B (Occupancy Load of 100 or less)
(1) Operation 16 Hours/Day or Less - $165/Year
(2) Operating More than 16 Hours/Day - $330/Year
66. Recuperation or Half Way House (Chapter 113)
A. Less than 10 Beds - $ 33/Year
B. 10-49 Beds - $ 55/Year
C. 50-99 Beds - $ 82/Year
D. Over 110 Beds - $110/Year
67. Amusement Devices and Centers (Chapter 114)
A. Devices - $55/Year Each
B. Centers - $300/Year
68. Bowling Alleys (Chapter 115) - $20/Alley/Year
69. Amusement Rides, Carnivals, and Circuses (Chapter 116) -
$125 for First Day + $20 for each additional day
70. Street Opening Permit - $500 to $700 per opening
71.
�rent-
� .
(regulated by the State of Minnesota)
72. A. Special Assessment Search - $10
B Utility Bill Assessment Search - $10
73. Photocopies - $.25/Sheet
74. Mailed Agendas
A. City Council - $20/Year
B. Planning Commission - $10/Year
75. Mailed Minutes
A. City Council - $40/Year
B. Planning Commission - $20/Year
76. Council Meeting Packets
A. City Council - $66P(eaf 250 Year
B. Planning Commission - $30P(ear Jt75.00\Year
77. City Code Book or Comprehensive Land Use Plan - $200
A. Zoning Chapter $40.00
B. Sign Chapter $5.00
78. Filing Fee for Public Office - $5.00
79. Police./Accident Report - $2/Page
80. Notary Public - $1
81. Blue Prints
Up to11x17
A. Blue Line - $ .50
B. Mylar - $1.00
Up to24x36
A. Blue Line - $1.75
B. Mylar - $4.00
Larger than 24 x 36
A. Blue Line - $.30/Sq.Ft.
B. Mylar - $.75/Sq. Ft.
82. New Resident List - $10.00
83. Community Room Rental - $100.00 deposit plus $25.00 fee for
residents/one time uses (i.e., showers, anniversary, Birthdays,
parties, etc.) $100.00 fee for non-residents. No charge for
community organizations for organization meetings
84. Silver View Park Shelter Rental - $50.00 clean-up deposit and
$50.00 key deposit plus $20.00 fee for residents or $50.00 fee
for non-residents
Lakeside Park Rental - $100.00 deposit plus $20.00 fee for
residents or $50.00 fee for non-residents
85. City Hall Shelter Rental - $25.00 deposit plus $20.00 fee for
residents or $100.00 deposit plus $50.00 fee for non-residents
86. Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) - $760.00 $800.00 (Effective
1/1/934 per Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
87. Storm Water Management (SWM)
A.
R-1 - $202.00/lot
B.
R-2 - $989.00/acre
C.
R-3 - $1,429/acre
D.
R-4, R-0, B-1 - $1,429/acre
E.
B-2, B-3, B-4, 1-1 - $1,996/acre
88. Unit Charge (Sewer) - $100.00 per new structure
89. Electrical Work - Same as established in the MN State Board
of Electricians March 1, 1972, Edition of Laws and Regulations
Licensing Electricians and Inspections of Electrical
Installations or as amended.
Electrical Inspector: Bob Clausen, 777-7885
Blank Forms Available - $1.50 each
90. A. Building Surcharge - .0005 times the valuation - If permit
has a set fee (not determined by value such as reroof,
reside, excavating, filling, etc.), then surcharge is $.50
B. Heating Surcharge - $.50 (unless permit fee exceeds
$1,000)
C. Plumbing Surcharge - $.50 (unless permit fee exceeds
$1,000)
D. Water Permit Surcharge - $.50
E. Sewer Permit Surcharge - $.50
91. Plan Check Fee - When a plan is required to be submitted by
Subsection (C) of Section 301 of the Uniform Building Code,
except for residential garages, storage buildings, decks and
additions costing less than $10,000.00 a plan review fee equal
to 65% of the building permit fee shall be paid. When plans
are incomplete or changed so as to require additional plan
checking, an additional fee shall be paid based upon Table
3A of the Uniform Building Code.
92. Insufficient Funds (NSF) Check - $20.00
93. Tax - 6.5%, maps, copies
94. Water Hydrant Deposit - $75.00 100.00
A. Water used from hydrant - $1.o615 1,000 gallons
B. Meter Deposit, 2-1/2" - $500.00
C. 5/8" Meter Deposit - $85.00
D. Wrench Deposit - $20.00
E. Hose Deposit - $20.00
F. Adapters - $20.00 deposit
95. Tree Removal - See City Forester
96. Planning Sign Deposit - $50.00 per sign
97. Park Dedication Fee
Residential:
0.0-2.0 Dwelling units/acre $100.00/acre
2.1.3.0 Dwelling units/acre $150.00/acre
3.1-4.0 Dwelling units/acre $200.00/acre
4.1-5.0 Dwelling units/acre $250.00/acre
Over 5.0 Dwelling units/acre 10bdof� land of
Cc rmercial/Industrial
10% of land...
98. Water Charge - $1.10J1,000 gallons
99. Sewer Charge - $43.00 per REC (billed quarterly)
100. Tapping (water or sewer) - City does not perform this service
101. Administrative Offense:
100.00
Snowbirds $25.00 Handicap Zone $$25.00
Fire Hydrant $25.00 Fire Lane
Keys in Ignition $20M.00 Blocking Mailbox _$1 5$4-9.00
30', Stop Sign $15$Q.00 Expired Plates $25$N.00
�
4ed QPg gg Plate/Tabs Missing 20$#0.00
Truck Parking $25.00 Other Illegal Prkg. 515$49.00
Load Limit $100.00 Seat Belts $25$Q.00
Signs $100.00 Zoning $100.00
Public Nuisance $100.00 Park Ordinance $25.00
Animals $25.00 Junk & Debris SOM.00 .00
Junk Vehicles $50$25.00 Garbage Dumping
Snowmobiles $25.00 Bldg. & Fire Code $100.00
Trespass $25.00 Regulated Bus.Act. $100.00
Alcohol in $25.00
Public $50$25.00 Loitering
Housing Code $100.00 Loud Parties/Noise $50.00
Streets/ $100.00
Driveways $100.00 Wetlands
Fireworks $100.00 House Numbers $25.00
102. House/Miscellaneous Building PValermits
tion
per Square Foot
Basic Floor Area
54.31
Basement (semi -finished)
14.92
Basement (unfinished)
11.40
Attached Garage (Wood Frame)
16.00
Detached Garage (Wood Frame)
Open Carport
11.95
44
Air Conditioning
2.45
Sprinkling System
1.42
Fireplace:
Brick Single (flat value)
2,000.00
Brick Double (flat value)
2,500.00
Free Standing (flat value)
1,000.00
Heatilator (flat value)
2,000.00
Deck
6.00
Deck (Mobile Home)
5.00
Addition
40.51
Second Floor Addition
40.51
Addition (Mobile Home)
20.00
Three Season Porch:
Screened Only
18.00
Wood Frame-Windows/Patio Doors
28.00
Four Season Porch
40.12
Accessory Building (Shed):
Cement Floor
7.50
Wood Floor
5.00
Swimming Pool Above Ground
6.00
Swimming Pool Below Ground
20.00
Decking/Fencing for Pool
Add $2.00/square foot
Remodeling (use valuation table)
Remodeling (use valuation table)
TOTAL VALUATION IS DETERMINED SEE VALUATION
WHEN
TABLE FOR PERMIT FEE. SEE SURCHARGE AND PLAN
CHECK FEE FOR ADDITIONAL CHARGES.
103. Meter Testing - $2&..50 J50.00 (free if meter is faulty)
104. Picnic Kits - $10.00 (Residents Only)
105. Video Tape Copies - $25.00
106. State Contractor License Verification - $5.00 Permit
(General Contractor Only)
107. Planned Unit Development - $350
Planned Unit Development Amendment - $150
108. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - $200
109. Street Light Utility - user fees
Residential (includes single family homes, duplexes,
fourplexes, condominiums and townhomes —4-24- .95 unit
(monthly)
Apartments - 4.-K 4.20 acre (monthly)
Commercial/Industrial - 6-.48 4.75 acre (monthly)
Institutional/Charitable - 6-48 4.75 acre (monthly)
110. Apartment/Multiple Dwelling List - $5.00
111. Mounds View Business List.- $10.00
112. Dog License List - $10.00
113. Surface Water Management Rates
R1 R2 Single & Two Family Residential $1.33/month
R-3 Medium Density Residential $7.27/month
R-4 R-5 RO High Density Residential Mobile Homes,
Residential Office $8.82/month
6 1 B 2 B-3 B-4 Neighborhood Business Limited Business
Highway Business,.Regional Business $11.31/month
1-1 Industrial $8.82/month
PF Public Facilities $3.48/month
PUD Planned Unit Development $10.00/month
CRP Conservancy Recreation & Presentation $1.23/month
School/Church Public Private $4.06
114. Water Quality Testing Charge from MN Department of Health
$1.43 per quarter
REQUrST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
STAFF REPORT
A(;ISNIIA SESSION DATE _ December 6, 1993
DISPOSITION
Apen(n Section: _ 8. __...
Relwn-t Nutnlw•r: 93_696WS _
Relx,rt Unto: _ 12-1-93 — _
r hem De,,iiption: Update on the November I, 1993 Discussions with Ramsey County Commissioner
wedell
Administrator's Review/Recnmmendation:
No comments to supplement this report
- Conunents nttnclted.
lisplanatlun'Summnrr fattach supplement sheets as neeemary.)
S MILS It11L (VARY:
At the November 1, 1993 Work Session, there were several items discussed
with Commissioner Wedell which Councilmember Quick has requested an
update:
1. Possible relocation of the County's compost site at
Ardan Park to a site near the Golf Course.
2. Realignment of Old 8 and County Road H - plans and
timeline coordination with City.
3. Preliminary numbers regarding the County contracting
with the City to provide plowing and sweeping of all
County roads within the City's borders.
Mary Saarion has been pursuing the possible relocation of the compost site
and has provided the attached staff report. Mike Ulrich has examined the
costs associated with a contract with the County for plowing and sweeping
and has included these preliminary costs in the attached staff report.
Paul Harrington and Mike Ulrich have also contacted the County to obtain
both the plans and timeline for the reconfiguration. of Old 8. That
information is also attached. Coordination plans between the City and the
County will be presented for discussion on Monday night.
Samantha
REXOMME,NUATION:
�Orduno City
istrator
REQUEST [' OR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 6.
STAFF REPORT Rcptrt Number: 93-696WS
AGENDA SESSION DAT'F, December 6, 1993 Rop)rt Date: 12-1-93
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Relocation of Compost Site
AdmiNsmttm s 1(v%w%w114-cnmmendntb n:
Nu continents to supplement this report
Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary innnch supplement Aeon an neceamary)
SUMMARY:
There has been a long standing hope that someday a new site would
be found for the compost pile currently located at Arden Park,
Off of Long Lake Road. An idea was suggested that perhaps enough
land is available near the golf course site for relocating the
compost site to this area. Ron Peterson, who did the wetland
work for the golf course was called to do some preliminary
estimations for the likelihood of relocating the compost site
there.
Ron Peterson has staked the wetland boundaries of the portion of
land owned by the City off of County Road J east of Sysco in an
effort to provide information regarding the possibility of moving
the compost pile currently located in Arden Park to this site.
As of today (Nov. 30) the area has not been surveyed, but
hopefully a map showing the area will be available for the Work
Session on Monday, December 6. Also, Ron is looking into
possible areas that may be conducive for the location of an
archery range. I have received information from Ramsey County
Parks and Recreation Department regarding two archery ranges, one
located at a golf course site and one located along Lexington
Ave. in Shoreview. This information is attached.
I spoke to Ron Peterson this morning to relay the message that I
would like to have the map of the wetland boundaries and
available area for a compost site by Mondays meeting on December
6th. He hopes to have the information ready by Monday. I will
have whatever information he has prepared at the meeting.
The Parks and Recreation Commission has a real interest in moving
the compost site from Arden Park for several reasons. One is
that the compost site does smell especially during the Spring and
whenever the windrows are turned. The site is very popular,
being one of the most highly used in the County. However, it is
also one of the most cramped sites in the County. The entrance
ltl:('t��l li�in\}s ugly and uninviting to park users. The compost
i
Mary Snarlmt,
Parks, Recreation and Forestry
pile at Arden Park is surrounded by residential homes whereas
most compost sites are located in areas that are less intrusive
to neighborhoods. The site is also an eyesore. The location of
the compost pile in Arden Park prevents the development of Arden
Park into the natural passive park that it was intended to be.
The site is used by many communities including Anoka County
cities of Blaine and Spring Lake Park. There is a steady stream
of cars coming from all directions of the northern suburbs during
the Spring and Fall months. This is good for composting, but bad
for the neighborhood residents residing around Arden Park.
The County Road J site would be only a short distance farther for
our residents, and certainly more convenient for residents of
Blaine and Spring Lake Park since the site would be off of a
major joint County Road. The County Road J site would be away
from residential neighborhoods. Access would be easy and quick.
Additional information and planning need to be done in the event
that the City Council agrees that the compost site should be
moved to this less intrusive location.
LAKE
KELLER
LAKE
r! ! a
1
Ic��r'T�G
K••x
i NIP
�E
j.p
zl •nnn'
ICC'J rfu lR"1 I Pd2Y AND
i
RECREATIONAL USE AREAS:
A BOAT ACCESS
i B CLAKE
SI
_ PICNICK AREA
I K'cLLER ISLAND
PICNIC AREA
I\`'•,\`'� ` I p LAKESIDE
PICNIC AREA
\\
v LOWER YELLER
E PICNIC AREA
GOLFVIEW
PIC14IC AREA
G ROSELA'NN HILL
ARE
�.J \ PICNIC A
1 ROUND LAKE
�'I (•� PICNIC AREA
GOLF COURSE
l{ � PRO SHOP
� • .....
v`
••
LEGEND
u 1 t)
V••• ,•
WATER
,4�i;i� J J
--••— PARK BOUNDARY
•'�• �3'.'
MARSH
\.�
F.,;
,!' WOODED AREAS
H ,,
::._,,
J ;• '.S
/...
......... PAVED PA(H
••
LAKE `�
" .•••••••• WILLARD MUPIGER
ROliN0
PHALEN
STATE TRAIL
LAKE
KELLER
REGIONAL PARK
Parks and Recreation Department
GreSory.l Neck. Director
Tel; 612•iii•I59
't0l5 N. Van Dyke Street Fax: 61&S77.651U
RAMSErcourm Maplewood. MN 15109,7536
November 18, 1993
Ms. Mary Sarion
Director of Parks and Recreation
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112
Dear Ms. Sarion:
Enclosed are the layouts for the two Ramsey County archery
ranges, Marsden and Keller Regional Park. Marsden attempts to
fit the shooting stations into a natural setting, while Keller
is more of a standard layout. Keller has five 20-yard
stations, two 25-yard, two 30-yard, two 35-yard and
one 40-yard. The 20 yard distance is most Dopular with
hunters, as that is the maximum length of shot they prefer
while hunting. Both sites are fenced with a single gate.
This is important for control and safety. Keller has a berm
behind the butts to stop arrows.
I wish I had better plans of each site, but this is all we
have. you will have to visit each site to see the details of
signs, bow racks, etc.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
r,1 �Al
Larry E. Holmberg
Supervisor of Planning and Development
LEH:jjh
111nnesota's First Rome Role Coaoty
mLan lnplM i4�l nlG, mi�IrvuTdl��l y�N.wn mtlim•nl
.:�iY
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
ACNNDA SESSION DATE.
DISPOSITION
Agenda Section:
Report Number:
fieport Date:
Item Description:
Providing Snow S Ice Control and Sweeping of the Ramsey County
Administrators Re�riewfflecommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report 1—
Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (aUHeh supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY:
This proposal includes preliminary costs related to the City of Mounds View providing snow and ice
control and sweeping of the Ramsey County roads within Mounds View.
The initial cost for the City, which would be billed back to the County, would be the purchase of an
additional dump truck with plowing equipment. (Estimated cost $75,000,00) Staff recommends an
equipment fee of $30.00 per hour plus personnel costs including benefits, approximately $25.00 per
hour. Deicing chemicals would be billed in accordance with the purchase price. Discussion of these
rates is encouraged. (These additional services could be provided by existing personnel.)
Sweeping of Ramsey County roads would be billed at current total personnel costs plus equipment
costs of S35.00 per hour. At this time, the City does not pay for disposal of sweepings. Should this
practice change, then the disposal charges would be added to the invoice.
i
Michael Ulrich. Public Works Supervisor
• .A
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 8.
n STAFF REPORT Report Number: 93-696WS
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 Report Dote: __ 12-2-93 _
DISPOSITION
heat Description: Realignment of Old 8 and County Road R
Administrator's Review/Recommendntion:
- No comments to supplement this report_
- Comments attached.
EvplanatioNSuntntar}nnuRh supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY,
Staff contacted the Ramsey County Department of Public Works regarding
proposed plans and construction timetables for the realignment and
reconstruction of the County Road H/Old Highway 8/Highway 10 intersection.
The County has tentatively set Spring of 1996 as the date for construction
to begin.
Representatives of the County informed Staff that no plans have been
prepared for the work. The City can expect to receive preliminary plans
for review purposes sometime in 1995.
anner Paul Harrington, City
It li('UJ1111?NU:1'1'1 ON:
nV
DISPOSITION
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
STAFF REPO
RT
December 6, 1993
AGENDA SESSION DATE
Item Description: Purchase of Engine Analyzer
Administrator'. Review/Recommendation:
Nu comments to supplement this report IK_
. Camnumts nttarhrd. __—..___ Q!
Expinnation'Sumnmrc uouich supplement 9hectfl ne neceaaary.l
SUNINIANY:
Agenda Section: I II
Report Number: 93-697WS
Report Date: 12-2-93
In the 1993 Budget Council approved the purchase of a new engine
analyzer to replace the outdated model. This purchase was equally
funded through the shop, water, and sewer capital accounts, each
supplying $4,000. During the budget process, this dollar figure was a
rough estimate due to the fact that new technology was being tested and
accurate prices were not available. Staff has had demonstrations from
two of the remaining scope manufacturers, Snap-On and Sun, and received
quotes on both. The quotes are as follows:
Snap-On $16,894.75
Sun $19,995.95
Although these two analyzers do basically the same job, they are not
considered equals and the Sun scope is more suitable for our
application. Some of the reasons staff is recommending the Sun scope
are:
A. Greater Flexibility
1. Computer operated, which is more user friendly.
2. Storage of records for maintenance costs.
3. Capable of handling more of a variety of different
vehicles and models.
4. Produces a computer printout of the analysis.
5. Numerous free training classes and updates.
As mentioned earlier, budgeted funds for this expenditure are $12,000
and the purchase price of the Sun scope with tax is $21,295.69. Staff
seeks Council's approval of using $3,000 from the sewer capital account,
(730-4121-703) (originally budgeted for a patch trailer), and $6,300
from the street capital account, (3.00-4270-703) originally budgeted for
a changable message Sinn trailer) to provide the remaining balance for
this pur,,V,1
Supery
IO. COUSIh:NIIATION:
Staff recommends the purchase of the Sun Model MCS4000 engine analyzer
for $21,300.00 and authorization from City Council to utilize other
capital funds for the purchase
jjj
DISPOSITION
Item Description:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
ST FF REPORT
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6. 1993
PETTY CASH FWD
Adminisirntor's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report_
Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (ntach supplement xheeln nn neeennary.)
S IhII NIARY:
Agenda Suction: 11.
Report Number. 93-698W8
Report Date: 11-1-93
Minnesota Statutes 412.271, Subd. 5, authorizes the establishment
of a petty cash fund. The City presently has a Petty Cash Fund of
$100 with a per claim limit of $10. The size of the Fund and the per
claim limit have been in effect for fifteen years. Staff believes it
is time to update this Resolution, and recommends that the per claim
limit be $20 and that the Fund Balance of the Fund be $200. Many
small items are purchased by employees with their own monies that are
over $10 and they have to have a special check issued or wait until
the Council approves claims at the next Council Meeting. Increasing
the limit on petty cash claims would make the process of reimbursing
employees for small expenses more efficient.
e fJ._
REC0,1131E.NDATION: Donald Brager, Unance Director
Adopt Resolution No. 4448, Establishing a Petty Cash Fund
RESOLUTION NO. 4448
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ESTABLISHING A PETTY CASH FUND
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 471.56,
Subdivision 5, authorizes the Council to establish an imprest,
petty cash fund;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council does
hereby establish a Petty Cash Fund for the purpose of paying
claims against the City which are impractical to pay in any other
manner. Said Fund shall be regulated in the following manner:
1) the sum of two hundred dollars shall be deposited in the
Fund and shall be maintained as the Fund Balance;
2) the Treasurer, or Treasurer's designate, shall be the
custodian of the Fund;
3) monies shall be disbursed by the custodian only for
proper claims against the City which are impractical to pay
in any other manner;
4) all such claims shall be authorized by the appropriate
department head prior to disbursement by the custodian;
5) no such claim shall exceed twenty dollars;
6) no claims shall be for salary or reimbursement of any
personal expense of a City officer or employee;
7) the custodian of the Fund shall submit a claim itemizing
all the various demands for which disbursements have been
made from the Fund to the Council at the next meeting after
the disbursements have been made along with a request for
transfer- of monies from the appropriate funds in order to
maintain the Petty Cash Fund.
(SEAL)
Adopted this 13th day of December, 1993.
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
nV
DISPOSITION
Itrm Ih�.rri ptinn:
RrQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
STAF_
AOF.NDA SIsSS10N DATF. December
13,
Agenda Section: _
Report Number:
93-699WS
Rry>nrt note: — 12-2-93 _ --
Discussion of Greenfield Ponds Development Agreement
Adnti nistrntnrs ReeiewiHeemnntrndntion:
m . No coments ut supPlenumt this rngtnrt—
Comments
Nplanatom,swnwary n,ttacit a 11111 ment sheets as neccMrY.1
SI="L the Harstad Companies, has asked Staff to
the issuance of building permits on the
Catherine Harstad, l regarding t en he
approach the Council regarding prior to completion of the project as
Greenfield Ponds development
stipulated in Development Agreement 92-97.
Paragraph 10 of the executed Development Agreement states that:
^The Developer must obtain pre -construction and post -construction
approval of the City Inspection Department for the surface drainage
will be
systems to be construcare obtained."d on the Bite* building p
issued until said approvalsect - including
phases of the pro J letion
It is the opinion of Staff tha
nd ondingareas, construction and comp
installation of storfinal site gradingm
of the road and, sewer aare all a part of the surface drainage
a significant portion of the project is complete;
system. At this time,
However, some items do remain unfinished.
Due to on -going construction on the project, Staff will ay Evening-
wvide the ith a list of items remaining to be completed on Monday
Paul Harrington, City anner
It I' 'O % - I )1T1 )N:
nV
DISPOSITION
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
AGENDA SESSION DATE December 6. 1993
Agerda Section: 14.
Report Number: 931000WS
Report Date _12-%--23_
Item Description:
Discussion of Off -Street parking for Robert's Off 10
Administrators Rerim/Recommendntion: r{7ry
No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached. ___ �l
Explanation/Summary (jutach supplement sheets as necessary.)
S 16R+ ARL
At the November 8, 1993 City Council Meeting, the Council approved the
request of Greg Waste, representing Robert's Off 10, for the alteration of
a previously approved on -site parking and screening plan at 2400 County
Road H2. Subsequent to Council action, Mr. Waste has done a considerable
amount of work on the property as allowed by the approval. As a part of
this work, Mr. Waste temporarily removed a berm located along the
Southernmost property line to allow for the placement of a six (6) foot
high board -on -board fence. Mr. Waste understood that the removal of this
berm was not a part of the City Council approval and, replacement would be
necessary.
Mr. Waste has recently contacted Staff to ask that a request be placed on
the agenda of the City Council to allow the removal of the aforementioned
berm to be permanent. The attached map is provided to indicate the area
of the berm in question.
Mr. Waste will be present Monday evening to answer any questions the
Council may have.
Paul Harrington, City Planner
REXODIMENDATION:
2545
2541
2537
9h�
1�" —"_a
ILLa
` 7L1D
7E47 7635 762 1754
7fi60 76 87635
76 7715 7626 3
167
Y n n 5 c O
1 763 7610 w
)1 5
-661
GFDGE4(. 5
5466
N�
$475
7611
g
7639
7525
7511
7595
76aa
. 76.30
7626
7510
759
765t
SaaS
5a6D
54"
Sua
5.13
7641
5466
Sa67
5a6a IW07
Saw
aJ -
<
ya3 Q] J7,
`'\
Sa67
Sail
7631
SaN
Sa55
7561
75M
7531
�
Saab
544710
7ws
7wa
s440
5aa1
—
�ryM1J N N 7351 75 a:7371 n
N Y T M _
N N N N 7535 75M
w�
7521 752C V
750S 75Da 750t
'ry4 5]9a � I
14 106. SPS St W n 12i j2 SIDI
2
c
n
ry
n
ry
5093
5090
sm
5071
5M 507
507
�
5%7
507095071
5066I5061
5066�505,
50N
N
5061 a'
.��
Y
IGi
h M1
110
15030,50311
EDGEWDOD
JR. HIGh
SGHDDL
SIOD
54M
LAMBERT
PAP.Y.
o �o
rvrvrvry
N
9�
/ IOODA(
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: y5,____
TAFF REPO ReportNaml r: 93=1001WS
ACENDA SESSION DATE December 6, 1993 Report Date: ____J-2-2-9-4_
DISPOSI'rION
heat Description'.
Discussion of Request for Rezoning and Development Review, Multi-Tech/Everest
Administrators Renew/Recommendation:
No comments In supplementthis repnrl _
Cnm mrnts ut uirlud.
Isplanatiun'Sununarp •ou.,rh .0 pplement sheets as necesssry.)
SUMMARY*
Everest Development, representing Multi -Tech, has made application for the
following within the Mounds View Business Park:
1) Development Plan Review - Review of a proposed 59,970 square foot two-
story building/facility expansion of Multi -Tech Systems to be constructed
to the West of the existing Multi -Tech building. Staff has reviewed the
submitted application and narrative provided by the applicant and found the
request meets the intent of the Municipal Code as it applies to this
request including land use, setbacks, zoning(if approved), parking, etc.
A review of the provisions for storm water control on the site is currently
underway. Staff anticipates no problems with storm water control on the
site as the ponding area constructed as part of the existing Business Park
was sized to handle the further development of this property as well as the
property to the immediate West.
2) Rezoning - Currently, the property located immediately West of the
Mounds View Business Park is zoned B-3, Highway Commercial (please see
attached map). The applicant is proposing that the aforementioned property
be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development, to accommodate the proposed
use of that parcel by Multi -Tech for required parking area. Also, the
rezoning would provide consistent zoning for the entire Business Park
complex.
I have included a very comprehensive application submittal provided by the
applicant for your review. Everest Development will be present on Monday
Evening to give a complete presentation of the proposal.
The Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the requests and
recommended approval in Resolution Nos. 371-93 and 372-93. Copies of both
Resolutions are provided for your review.
Paul Harrington, City P*ner
PLANNIN
MOUNDS
VIEW TON NOG C OMMI3 SION
RESOLCITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ONING
RESOLUTION
EVERESTCDEVELOPMENT, POLANNING CASEVAL OF A ZNO. 367EST OF
-93
WHEREAS, Everest Development has made application to rezone
nd Northeast of
the property located Bouth of usiness touPUD,RPlannedaUnit Development; anday
l0 from B-3, Highway
WHEREAS, the property is legally known as:
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the
yNorthwestS.HQuarter
Nof
the Southeast Quarter lying
10, and the Northwest Quarin ter of the Northwept30�aRange 23the
Southeast Quarter,
Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the United States
Government Survey thereof; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 40.25, Subdivision A(5), provides that the
Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects of the
It further states that judgement shall be based
proposed amendment.
upon, but not limited to, the following factors:
I. Relationship to Municipal Comprehensive Plan
2. The geographical area involved
3. Whether such use will tendto or actually depreciate
the area in which it is proposed
area
4. The character of the surrounding
5. The demonstrated need for such use; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed
the request in relation to the aforementioned criteria; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning request is consistent with the City's
current Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation for this property
which is mixed use planned unit development; and
WHEREAS, approval of the request will provide fosed land
designation which is consistent with the current and prop
use.
NOW, OTofRESOLVED
request tothe
rezonemounds
theepropertyPlanning
Commission recommendsmmendsapproval
legally known as:
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarterof
10
the southeast Quarter lying northeasterly of U.S. Highway
and the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of th23,
Ramseyacounnty, Minnesota, according toothehUnited States
Ramsey Y�
Government Survey thereof.
Resolution No. 371-93
Page Two
from B-3, Highway Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs
Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval
of the minutes.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this 1st day of December, 1993.
Chairman
nner
MOUNDS PLANN
NING3COMMISSION
ON
R.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
HE
NT
OREOLUTIN FSMULTIOTECH, 2205DWOODALERDRIVE, OVAL FPLANNINGECASE EREQUEST NO.367-93
WHEREAS, Multi -Tech has requested City approval to
construct a 59,970 square foot addition to their existing
facility at 2205 Woodale Drive; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 59.07 of the Mounds View Municipal
Code requires that a development review be conducted for all
commercial and industrial developments within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
following documents regarding this development prop
1. Planning Application dated October 29, 1993
2. Site/Landscape Plan dated October 4, 1993
3. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan dated
October 14, 1993
4. Exterior Elevation Plan dated October 8, 1993
5. Floor Plan dated October 27, 1993
6. Electrical Site Plan dated October 27, 1993
7. Illumination Distribution Plan dated October 27,
1993; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that
ts
the proposal is in conformance with all applicable
of Chapter 40.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
Planning Commission recommends approval of the development review
request.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council
prior to approval of the minutes.
Adopted this 1st day of December, 1993,
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
rman
Planner
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
PLANNING APPLICATION
Art^II Mu:ci= eca Svsters, :nc. there 785-3500 '-
ADD FE:S:
205 Wgodale Drive, Mcunds View, Minnesota 551!2
Streez Address, Ciry, State, and Zip Ccde
Interest in Proper (check appropriate box):
,�1 Owner of Proper/
j Contract for Deed Owner
Lessee, Operator, Manager
1-1 Acreementto purchase ?ortion o: proverty vest o= existing Multi -tech
ryi Other (explain) property to be accuired from Commercial ?roper:
investments, Inc.
Cccumenary evidence or aspiicam's interest m :tin onerry may be required beicre fnm clay endn cr this recueat
PROPERTY INVOLVED:
Address/General LDc2tlOn 3905 Woodaie Drive and ad?acenvroperty to :rest. north
L'cal Owner: Name/Address Multi -Tech Svscems, Inc., and Commercial ?rooerty
lnvestme....ts, inch, =685 Long Lake Road, dose•:ill¢, M`: 55113
Present Use (check acprcpdate box):
1 UndevelcoedA'acant
r Single Family Dwelling
_i Duplex, W0 =amity Dwelling
L Multi -Family (No. of Units
[; Business/Commercial Establishment
r i Industrial Establishment ?or:ion c.' rropzrty cur:entl;: deve-loped with
�_.I Other (explain) parkins a^.d associated 4-m?rovements sere.ns
Mu_.i ter s existing iaci_ity at =905 Wooda:
Frcpery Classification: ] Abstract _ Torrens Drive
REQUEST: ADDlitation for General Concept and Develooment State ?.l!.D. approval
to construct 39,970 square _'pot expansion to existing Multi= ech corporace head-
guartarsimanu:acturing r -y, with associated parking and site imorovemenrs;
rezoning of acquisition p rzzl.from 3-3 to ?.�.D.
! HERE3Y C=CL ARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ASE TRUE.
..............................................................................
Rezoning
s2calacm minimum s2Co. maximum 51 0
Vanarro
R•; to 'n•2 • S75. all caner: S20
Ccndiscnal Use Permit
R•t :o R•2 • 575. alit others 5tCO
Code Acceel
S75
Develoo.lSite Plan Review
S: macre. minimum too, maumum 5'-co
Minor Succivmcn
sL0
Major Succivrmn
s250 plus 5250 eeeosa
Como. Plan Amercmert
S' o
wetland Alteratcn Permit
S50 Plus oeocal determined by Star!
Welland Eu:.er Permit
Slo
Planning Sign
:so
PUD
5.:50
FUD Amendment
„ i 50
Pvk Fvrd Cea.=,cn Fee
Cate Pad
Receiet Number
Acdldcnal Rees Paid
Date Paid
Recemt Number
TOTAL FEES PAID
�� Ge. cc
DATE PAID
P.-'- ' 1
RECEIPT NUMBER
Cate at final ec:cn
AFPROVEO Z
CE.VIED Z TABBLi
l - 4 — G i ? �� — 4 �i Admin. Ac:ount No.
Date �I � v Psimng Case No. �'
NC-E Planning Applicatio.^. fees rota -'ling 51.100 are sti:l on '_i'.e with City itom prior
^tanni _ :pp'-izacon subrirted .-29-93, and subsecuent ;+ :__..dra•.^.^...
I
I�Iwl
In
lnlwl
fSi'
w�n
tilM1�pl J
PROPOSED AREA FOR REZOINI:1G
D-J TO PL'D
NCLTI-TECH SITE
(:::CLL'DiXG EPA\SIO%)
iI 01111DNIG DATA
i (nsNrc bIIIII.nfi r1lUumnN .Si.11' S!
L nsuor, mw 0ulc nm uDcx .i!.e4B3(
praxrn bml lwn: IDlq 11�]. S(
1.51 •Nullul l4nlPNull
nI51 •Itlu11G11nOIVNx11
n(41 l LrU IIUG]
_7t],.]f=
}tl.799.$(.�
-d9 �5O
•'Milt"t" 101nl•l
5(f�
[Wb4ltll N191.1e IUI.I
111.4. 5l
J
SITE OATA
Willi 0 JI( •xl4
.E1!.Qftl.5r
Bunnmc lnnlvxnns
.C19]S3 (.—.
SILL
eldurN •x1. 1r f
_t17:4tl.4U7)�.
_194.S27.iC 1}];
G•10 'X•tl 1 WIDr .Fl•
-]!'e.!E@3f.144'a;
(o v0� ul1 uYNll
'Ik
! ""` "•�• COUNTY ROAD NZ
UNDEVELOPED LAIIU 1
Aft I E ROD.
I.
`• yy// t
POIIU
,64
411 Mun5G1a 1•r •x .�
I
I
MULTI•TECI,
BUILDING
PROPOSED
I.., ION
n]l
r
I
MULTI-TELII BUILDING �
EXISTING EAST YANG
nr Rn.1— —
u.Ll.11lllllll _ ulll.luulll�l�l
S1
t
cwm eu,u '¢
'II EXISTING DUILDING E
ILDINO IINL TI-iC[II BUILDING
IPNSED [xIS11UG CAST vh+G
IITiNII
9085 1 1 rTE • 9M
tsar
lm,r
LEGEND
tni u
umxc rwmto
-
t�t
uu. urn .... a •�scn�
Ci
fT*'-*'- - -- - -------
r sr Di pi F.
A Joa-
n
Tn 2-0
c:
El
�
1
slue
Ir
I
�
H� 119UN[
Ali
IIYI ��
I
I
L
`
�11
\ o
LYI
NIY wiuNl nrl 'M
h;
L�
•'N1
COUNIY-NOAI1-117--- ---" df'
'emu 37-Z,"'\- \;.---"—_---'—'.- 6 �•1
. Jill,
lX151111G WN 11110115E Ym10Ulc
1 � 1
l !y
/LL i 10
Va
•0
Aw J,.
MULTI-T[CII j ° t
PROPOSED MULTI-0[[N BUDDING
WEST WING [xIs1111G Usl WIIIG I �� I N
— i
Eli
lu
1 �{ fi(flllll�I" Ulf 11110111 ip, ! �q
� :.w
�I lIL1LL( Lil II11Il71IIIIII�9.1n L� �q
----1 -
"-�_-
N
POND
ILID_YLVIi10_V DISf81BUf/0Y PLIV
C[n wi
/14
•a 1\ILINar _ Gi NJ Na 4La NJ Ni � _ _ .._ N.
CxITN.ELEv=t ��-'
I _t l_..:. - Ili•\ -
1._ lip _ iw_ �nJ Mu 4•J a•• L•. u J NJ
L--"-- - _ - =(
1 —
-- '........
W �u -_
I I c —=sl .
L@
mg� ........... ---------------------
,,_... ,_ri.•.., IaiE IELEYSTIv'�' ----- /l E_gI!=Ltl0RU5LEY=T ICA_
y') F=hTInLUQS RL ELE Yr_TIG_9.
I
�1I
DnvOl 15
J,11 W SOb
{ MITfGI1Nl
A2
m—�
rL
EF
r
I W=_
, 'ECCAJD FLOOR PLAN -NEW WEST Wl"5 @!ECONC) FLOOR PLAN -EXISTING EAST WING
ol
.
re.
17 Z
J!L
FIRST FLOOR PLAN -EXISTING EAST WIW3
C3)�L�57 FLOOR PLLN-14EW WEST W1145
Al
EVEREST DEVELOPMENTLTD
October 29, 1993
Paul Harrington
Planning Technician
City of Mounds view
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, M 55112
Re: Planning Application
Multi -Tech Systems, Inc. Facility Expansion
Dear Paul:
I believe that under separate cover Multi -Tech Systems,
Inc., has submitted its Planning Application
related
59 licat on970 square foot
plan submittals concerning their prop
facility expansion. Enclosed as a supplement to that
(15) copies of narrative materials
Application are fifteen
further describing the proposed expansion.
S4e, and Multi -Tech Systems, request that you place this
Planning Application on the earliest possible meeting
schedule with the Planning Commission and City Council. our
goal is to obtain all required
approvals
t to fall permIt we
construction start as soon as possibleY
request your assistance and that of other City staff,
Planning Commission and Council members in expediting the
approval of these applications, so that Multi -Tech Systems'
business growth facility expansion can}n e accomtax m increment
dated in
mounds View Business Park. As you
u know,
are ongoing and
completed
financing negotiations for this project
in the near
will, hopefully be successfully
future.
We look forward to working with you on the enclosed Planning
Applications. Multi -Tech and Everest
representatives
are
plan
prepared to meet with you at y
our convenience for review. Please feel free to call Scott Wylie at Multi -Tech,
the project architect Scott Nelson (S71-bme orlfyou
plan
have any questions concerning the applications
Submittals.
Paul Harrington
October 29, 1993
Page Two
Than?: you for your consideration.
sincerely,
EVEREST DEVELOPMENT, LTD.
/- /1L��
Timothy J. Nelson
Enclosures
cc: Scott Wylie
Scott Nelson
TJN/jk
Planning Appplication for
hSulti-Tech S��stems. Inc.
Facility expansion
Submitted October 29, 1993
Introduction
The following narrative materials and information are
submitted to supplement the plans and Planning Application
submitted October 29, 1993 concerning the proposed Multi -Tech
Systems, Inc. facility expansion in Mounds View Business Park.
In connection with the proposed expansion, Applicant Multi -
Tech Systems, Inc., is requesting General Concept and
Development Stage Planned Unit Development approvals for the
project, and rezoning of the expansion site from B-3, Highway
Commercial, to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.).
Project Summary
The proposed Multi -Tech Systems, Inc. facility expansion
includes a 59,970 square foot two-story brick building
addition to be constructed principally on the west end of the
existing Multi -Tech Systems facility at 2205 Woodale Drive,
and associated parking and site improvements. The
architectural style, building materials, landscape treatment
and intended uses of the proposed addition are all designed to
compliment and mirror the existing Multi -Tech facility.
Multi -Tech Systems is a leading manufacturer of computer
modems and related communications devices and is the leading
employer in the City of Mounds View with 300 current
employees. The proposed facility expansion is designed to
accommodate Multi-Tech's anticipated continuing busienss
growth and development in a high -image corporate headquarters
facility.
The expansion facility will be built by Everest Construction
Company, for ownership by Multi -Tech Systems, Inc.
DEVELOPMENT TEAM
APPLICANT/DEVELOPER: Multi -Tech Systems, Inc.
PROPERTY OWNER: Multi -Tech Systems, Inc., and
Commercial Property Investments, Inc.
SITE PLANNING Dovolis, Johnson & Ruagieri, Inc.
& ARCHITECTURE:
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Dovolis, Johnson & Rugaieri, Inc.
CIVIL ENGINEER: Putnam Consultants, P.A.
SURVEYOR: All Metro Development Consultants,
P.A.
GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Everest Construction Company
REAL ESTATE BROKER,: Nielsen and Associates Realty, Inc.
LEGAL COUNSEL: James Lockhart (CPI)
Popham, HaiY., Schnobrich & Doty, Ltd.
Lawrence Brynestad (Multi -Tech)
Jensen & Swanson, P.A.
mnpp
multi-wh floppy
DEVELOPMENT TE.01 CONTACT INFORMATION
DEVELOPER:
multi -Tech Systems, Inc.
2205 Woodale Drive
Mounds View, yX 55112
785-3500
785-3515 (fax.)
Contact: Scott Wylie
PROPERTY OWNER/ Commercial Property Investments, Inc -
PROPERTY Long Lake Road
SELLER: Roseville, MN 55113
636-5500
636-0163 (fay)
Contact: Tim Nelson or Rob Davidson
SITE PLANNING Dovolis, Johnson & P.uggieri, Inc.
ARCHITECTUP£: 1121 East Franklin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55404
671-6009
671-1746 (fay)
Contact: Scott Nelson
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
Dovolis, Johnson & Ruggieri, Inc.
1121 East Franklin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55404
S71-6009
871-1746 (fax)
Contact: Scott Nelson
CIVIL E14GINEER: Putnam Consultants, P.A.
7441 Jolly Lane
Brooklyn Park, M14 55428
425-1233
425-2033 (fax)
Contact: Dave Putnam
SUR'%'EYOR: All Metro Development Consultants,
P.A.
7111 West Broadway
Suite 201
Brooklyn Park, MN 55428
566-8487
566-8517 (fax.)
GENERAL C014TRACTOR: Everest Lake c
Construction Company
2685 Longoad
Roseville, MN 55113
636-5500
636-0183 (fax)
Contact: Rick Anderson or Rick. Baker
DEVELOPMENT TEAM CONTACT INFORMATION (contd.)
REAL ESTATE BROKER: Nielsen and Associates Realty, Inc.
2685 Long Lake Road
Roseville, MN 55113
636-5500
636-0183 (fax)
Contact: Rob Davidson
LEGAL COUNSEL: James Lockhart (CPI)
Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Doty, Ltd.
3300 Piper Jaffrey Tower
222 South Ninth Street
Minneapolis, Ms 55402
333-4800
334-2781 (fax)
Lawrence Brynestad (multi -Tech)
Jensen & Swanson, P.A.
8525 Edinbrook Crossing
Suite 201
Brooklyn Park, MN 55443
424-8611
493-5193 (fax)
Legal Description of Property
D.T.N. 08-30-23-42-0001 and 08-30-23-42-0012:
of
That part of the Southwest Quarter northeasterlyOfNorthwest
Highway rNo.
the Southeast Quarter lyingof
lo, and the Northwest Quarter of the
Northwest
90,tRange 23e
southeast Quarter, all in SaccorP ding to the United States
Ramsey County, Minnesota,
Government Survey thereof.
Fee Owner: Robert H. Waste
Contract for Deed Purchaser:
Commercial Property Investments, Inc.
p.Z.N. 08-30-23-31-0001 !part oft:
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of
the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 30, Range 233at
,
Ramsey County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning
the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of Sectionassumed
thence South 00 degrees 00 theuteastes 371ine seconds
s said t Southwest
bearing, 525.42 feet along No. 10;
Quarter to a point on the north line of Trunk Highway
thence North 49 degrees thenceuNorth740seconds degreese st 35105-00 minutese13
along said north line; 00
seconds East 30.32 feet; ; thenceence Northth decrees 00
-degrees minutes 37
seconds West 217.66 feet; thence North 00 degrees 00
23 seconds East 133.36 feet; point on the north
minutes 37 seconds West 86.77 fe aSouth E9 degrees 26
line of said Southwest Quarter; thence
East feet
minutes 01 seconds Ramsey county�lN.innesot ong said north line to
the point of beginning, }'
Fee owner: Commercial Property Investments, Inc.
p.I.N. 08-30-23-42-0011:
Lot 2, Block 1, Mounds View Business Park 2nd Addition
Fee Owner: Multi -Tech Systems, Inc.
Usting Site Conditions
The Multi -Tech expansion site consists of approximately 12.19
acres of land, exclusive of County Road H-2 right-of-way,
with approximately 870 feet of frontage on the north side of
Highway 10 and approximately 650 feet of frontage on the south
side of County Road H-2. Added to the existing Multi -Tech
site of approximately 5.68 acres, the total expanded Multi -
Tech site will be approximately 17.67 acres in area.
The expansion site is bordered by County Road H-2 and
residential properties to the north. To the east, the site is
bordered by Woodale Drive and Buildings E (Multi -Tech Systems)
and F within the Mounds View Business Park. Bordering the
site on the south is Trunk Highway 10, and to the west is the
Saturn automobile dealership.
The site also contains, in the southeast corner, Pond "C", an
aesthetic and storm water drainage pond installed during the
development of Phase 1 of Mounds View Business Park. This
pond, approximately 1.5 acres in surface area, was sized,
engineered, and located to handle all the drainage from the
subject site, in addition to some of the drainage from
developed properties to the east. The pond is subject to an
existing drainage easement.
The site slopes slightly in a north to south direction and has
been the subject of engineered filling to bring the site up to
the approximate grades of adjacent developed properties.
Current zoning of the expansion site is B-3, Highway
comnercial. The existing Multi -Tech building site is zoned
P.U.D.
Site Accessibility
Prinary access to the Multi -Tech expansion site will be via
the existing driveways and curb cuts from Woodale Drive
serving the existing Multi -Tech building. This access
provides full site ingress and egress at the Woodale Drive
intersection with Highway 10. No additional direct access
from Highway 10 is currently planned for the proposed
expansion. One driveway access point is proposed at County
Road H-2 in the northern area of the site, for automobile
traffic only. All truck traffic serving the Multi -Tech
expansion site will enter and leave the site via Woodale Drive
and Highway 10.
Site Development Plan -
P.U.D. Concept and Development Stave
Site planning for the proposed Multi -Tech expansion is driven
by the desire to maintain the high corporate image of the
existing Multi -Tech facility, with the addition to be
consistent with the existing building in architectural style,
building materials and landscape treatment. The proposed
om the
addition would extend westerly approxi�2}eng advantage rof the
west wall of the existing building,
excellent visibility and exposure to Y.iahway 10, with views
overlooking the ponding area at the northwest corner of
Highway 10 and Woodale Drive.
The total floor area of the addition is 59,970 square feet,
consisting of a small (3,500 souare foot) single
vel
addition in the truck dock area at the northeast corner of the
building, and a two -level west addition with 2E,299 square
sresond
feet on the first floor and esentsl an u Elk f expansion a ofeCthe
floor. The addY
addition ep-
existing building floor area of 73,724 square feet, for an
e>:panded total building area of 133,694 square feet. The
building elevations feature continuation of the double banded
of
window patterr. of the existing building,
a second two-story sky -lit atrium entrance s}metrical with and
identical to the main entry of the existing building.
The existing building is served by 26E parking stalls. The
proposed building addition will require the removal of 101
stalls. Construction of 346 new parLng stalls will result in
a net gain of 245 stalls serving the addition. Total parking
spaces available after the addition will be 513 stalls, for a
ratio of 4.26/1,000.
Site landscaping is to be provided consistent with the
existing Multi -Tech site and the remainder of Mounds view
Business Par}:. The lspecieslto provideng eyear round s a ecolor.
evergreen and ty of
ornamental species
The landscaped berm constructed along County Road H-2 as part
of the Phase I development will be continued along the
northern portion of the Multi -Tech expansion site. Site
drainage will be handled by catch basins in the paved areas
and piping to the existing dray r vicepond to the building in the southeast
corner of the site. Delivery
continue to be provided at truck docks located at the
northeast corner of the existing building. The east wall of
this dock area will be moved approximately 45 feet further
east to allow for a 3,500 square foot expansion of the
receiving area. Iio additional truck docks are proposed to be
installed with the addition.
other Public Decisions/Approvals Necessary
for Implementation of Proposed P.U.D. Plan
Rezoning of Acquisition Site from B-3, iiiah%say Commercial,
to Planned Unit Development'�P.U.D.)
The so-called "Waste" property which Multi -Tech intends to
acquire from Commercial Property Investments, Inc., to
accommodate its expansion is currently zoned B-3, 'righway
Commercial. Applicant requests that the acquisition/expansion
site be rezoned from B-3 to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.)
to accommodate Applicant's intended use of the property for
office, manufacturing/production, and distribution/
warehousing. This requested rezoning is consistent with
Applicant's use of its existing building at 2205 Woodale
Drive, and with the current P.U.D. zoning in place for said
property and the other developed properties within Mounds view
Business Park.
Tax Increment Financing Approval
Applicant acknowledges the separate application for "Pay -as -
YOU -Go" Tar. Increment Financing assistance submitted by
Everest Development, Ltd., in connection with Applicant's
proposed expansion. Applicant acknowledges that approval of a
tax increment financing agreement between the City and
Applicant and/or Everest Development, Ltd., will be required
to proceed with Applicant's proposed expansion.
Building Area Summary (in Square Feet)
second
Gross
Building
Floor
Floor
Building
Footprint
Area
Area
Existing Multi -Tech
52,156
21,566
73,724
Proposed Addition
31.799
28,271
59.970
Totals
83,955
49,739
133,694
Land Allocation and Coverage Calculations
Multi -Tech Existing Site:
247,518
Approximate Site Area
52,156
Building Footprint Area
21%
Building to Land Coverage:
114,016
Parking and Drive Area
(46%)
166,172
Surfaced Area of Site
(67%)
£1,346
open Space and Green Area
(33%)
Combined Existing and Expansion Multi -Tech Sites:
Approximate Site Area
(excluding County Road H-2
841,626
right-of-way)
E3,.°55
Building Footprint Area
10%
Building to Land Coverage:
212, 56S
Parking and Drive Areas
(25%)
296,523
Surfaced Area of Site
(350)
545,105
open Space 6 Green Area
(65%)
Maintenance of Common Open Spaces
The Multi -Tech expansion site will include common open spaces
(e.g. parking, driveways and landscaped green areas)
that will
be owned, cared for and maintained by Multi -Tech Systems,
Inc., as the property owner. The site will also include the
existing Pond "C" drainage pond which will continue o torbe
the Multi -Tech property and other adjoining prop
maintained by Multi -Tech Systems, Inc., as owner, subject to
the existing Pond Maintenance and Assessment Agreement of
record.
Phasing Schedule
The Multi -Tech Systems expansion project is proposed for
construction commencing fall, 1993, as soon as necessary
project approvals can be obtained, with completion by spring,
1994.
16.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section:
STAFF REPORT Report Number:
93-1002WS
December 6, 1993 RratrtDate: 12-2-93
AGENDA SESSION DATF, l _
DISPOSITION
Rem Description: Discussion of Planning Commission Recommendation Regarding Car Lots
Adminktrators Review/Recommmndation:
No comments to supplement this report_
Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary amich =vpplrmcnt sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY:
At the direction of the City Council, Staff brought the issue of Car Lots
as an allowable use in the City to the Planning Commission for discussion
and recommendation. Following discussion at the November 17, 1993 Planning
Commission meeting, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 373-93
at their December 1, 1993 Regular meeting.
The Resolution recommends that the Council establish a moratorium on the
establishment of any new Car Lots in the City for a period of 18 months.
This moratorium would allow the Planning Commission and City Council time
to further review the subject and consider the forthcoming recommendations
of the Focus 2000 Issue Groups. Please note that the Resolution does not
recommend limiting the expansion of Car Lots which are currently licensed
to operate in the City.
Staff awaits Council direction on this matter.
i
Paul Harrington, Ci Planner
i(L (Y 1.N1,111S N1>AT I ON:
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 373-93
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTIAONND USED LOTS WITHINBLISTHE CITYT OF A OF MOUNDS VIEW
ON NEW
WHEREAS, at the direction of the City Council, theyiew .
Mounds View Planning Commission has conducted an in-depth
of the requirements for establishment of new and used car lots
within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission review included review
of Chapters' 40, 59 and 109 of the Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that
there exists a need for further review and possible amendment of
the existing regulations governing the operation of new and used
car lots within the City; and
WHER-AS, the Planning commission recognizes the fact
project to
that groups have been formed thepart
Cit including land use and
study issues that are facing Y
business establishment; and
WHEREAS, the findings of these study groups may provide
direction for both the Planning Commission and City Council on
issues of land use within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission wishes to incorporate
these findings in their further review of the new and used car
lot issue.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
Planning Commission recommends the placement of an 18 month
moratorium on the establishment of additional new and used car
lots within the City of Mounds View.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
does not intend this moratorium to prevent the continuance of or
the expansion of currently licensed new and used car lots within
the City.
Resolution No. 373-93
Page Two
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council
prior to approval of the minutes.
Adopted this 1st day of December, 1993.
ATTEST: _
Chairman
(SEAL)
Planner
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA SlsSSION DATF. December 6, 1993
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Review of "Snow and Ice Control Policy"
Admiaistrator, Review/Recommendation:
No comments to supplement this report
Comments attached. _
Fsplanatlan/Summary (attach suPPlemenl sheets as necessary.)
CI fMMAIIY:
Agenda Section: 17
Report Number: oa t nni Wc
Report Date: _12-2-93
Staff would like to review the current "Snow and Ice Control Policy"
(copy attached), i.e., repair of boulevards in the spring and sanding
procedures in the winter with the City Council.
oyry Klanc�:q A37C1\:
SNOW AND ICE CONTROL POLICY
DFTFRMINITION OF EEEEi) AND INTRODUCTION
The City of Rounds view has determined that it is in the hest
interests of the residents for the City to assume basic
responsibility for control of snow and ice on streets under the
jurisdiction of the City. Appropriate snow and ice control is
necessary for emergency services as well as routine travel.
Providing this service in a cost effective manner is a
discretionary decision of the City Council. Previously the City
contracted with Ramsey County for these services; due to concerns
with the cost effectiveness of contracting as well as timeliness
of service, the City will now use City employees and equipment to
provide this service. Therefore; this policy is needed to provide
direction for these operations and guidelines for employees and
residents based on available resources.
The City of Mounds View has approximately 79 miles of streets
under its jurisdiction. These are primarily local streets serving
residential needs. In addition, Ramsey County has jurisdiction
over approximately 11 miles of collector and arterial roads
within the City. Trunk Highway 10 and is under jurisdiction of
the Minnesota Department of Transportation. This policy is
intended to provide guidelines for snow and ice control
operations for streets under the City's jurisdiction only. Some
sidewalks adjacent to County Roads are also covered by this
policy.
COMh1EN_CIMEN ' PE OPERATIONS
Snow and/or ice control operations shall commence under the
direction of the Public Works Foreman. In his absence the police
officer on duty and the public works standby man will consult and
determine when and what operations to begin.
The basis of dispatch calling the standby person to start
Operations shall be as follows. Snow accumulation of 2" with
continuing snowfall warrants commencement of plowing operations.
Drifting of snow may warrant commencement of partial or full
operations dependent on conditions. Icing of pavements may
warrant partial or full operations dependent on extent and
conditions. The Foreman shall determine the time to start
operations and the extent of operations.
The Foreman shall Prepare weekly crew assignments and shift
assignments for Personnel not on standby duty. Storms forecast
for late afternoon or evening hours may be the basis for the
Foreman splitting a shift and sending crew(s) home for call out
filter in the evening. Morning storms likewise may be the basis
for requesting crew(s) to report at later than norpal hours.
suspi;N.5_LQJi U QPERATIAS
operations shall continue until all roads are passable. Widening
and clean up operations may continue immediately or the following
working clay dependent on conditions. operations may also he
suspended during periods of limited or zero visibility. Any
decision to suspend operations shall be made by the supervisor on
duty and shall be based on conditions of the storm.
pLW goU,EES A 1p SFOUENCING
There are city streets, public sidewalks, public parking lots,
and ice rinks under the City's jurisdiction which are affected by
this policy. All City streets will be assigned to a route.
sidewalks along collector streets, and sidewalks serving public
facilities shall be cleared by City forces after street routes
are completed. City parking lots and ice rinks shall also be
cleared after street routes have been completed. The attached map
shall indicate plow routes and sidewalks, parking lots and ice
rinks designated to he cleared.
Phe pul)lic: Works Foreman has the responsibility of determining
plow routes and sequencing of operations. The routes and
sequencing shall be indicated on the route map. This map shall he
adopted by the City Council and shall not be altered without
consultation and approval of Council. The Foreman shall retain
latitude to adjust sequencing or route assignments based on storm
conditions, equipment availability, and/or other conditions
warranting changes.
Priority locations are indicated on the route map. These
locations are of public interest and may be given higher priority
for response dependent on the time of day or other circumstance.
These areas include the City Nall complex, schools, and
locations of public interest.
EEVEI, OF SEINUCE
The intention of this policy is to provide safe winter driving
conditions appropriate for the type of travel necessary on the
city's streets. The level of service described herein shall be
considered a guideline with the understanding that during and
immediately after a storm the level of service provided may be
less than described herein and may vary across the City dependent
on storm conditions. Streets shall be plowed and/or sanded to
provide intermittent bare pavement and sanded intersection
approaches and curves. cul-de-sacs and dead end streets may have
few if any bare pavement spots. Gravel and dirt road surfaces
shall be plowed to provide a hard pack surface with sand and/or
abrasives spread as necessary for traction. A minimum of
chemicals will be used to achieve the conditions stated and to
provide workable stock piles of sand and/or abrasives.
OA
During light to normal snowfalls, streets will he plowed full
width on the initial pass. During heavier snowfalls, streets
shall be plowed as wide as possible initially and widened as the
storm intensity lessens. After the storm passes, clean up
operations shall begin to clear intersections and snow storage
areas along corners and boulevards. It is the City's intent to
complete initial plowing and widening operations within 12 hours
of the cessation of the storm. Clean up operations should he
complete within 24 hours for light snowfalls, and within 48 hours
for heavy snowfalls. Major blizzards may require additional time.
PARKING B-WrRICTIONS
on street parking is not compatible with efficient snow plow
operations. Vehicles left parked on the street for extended
periods create problems for snow plowing as well as safety
problems with packed snow and ice around the vehicle. Ticketing
and/or towing of these vehicles may occur in conformance with
city code. Additionally, after large accumulations of snow the
City may find it advisable to proscribe parking restriction to
facilitate plowing and clean-up operations. In this event the
Clerk -Administrator in consultation with council members shall
determine the appropriate restriction and announce the
restriction(s) through the media. These restriction may include
odd/even side parking prohibitions or even complete parking
prohibitions for certain streets.
PROPERTY pA AGE
Snow plowing and ice control operations can cause property damage
even under the best of circumstances and carefulness on the part
of the operators. The major types of damage are to improvements
in the Right -of -Way and landscape damage. It is appropriate to
specify when this damage shall be the responsibility of the City,
and when it shall be the responsibility of the resident.
Improvements In the Right -of -Way include mail boxes, planter
boxes, lighting fixtures, and irrigation systems. These items
have been placed in the City's property, in most instances,
without notification or permission of the City. Mail boxes and
similar objects are quite often obvious and easy to avoid. Low
structures and irrigation systems are impossible to be aware of
after a storm. Therefore; we have made stakes available to
residents which they can use to identify low and underground
structures.
We recommend the city accept liability for structures which are
obvious or are marked and which have been damaged by physically
tieing struck by a plow blade or other piece of equipment. Mail
boxes, lights, etc. should be constructed sturdy enough to
withstand snow rolling off a plow or wing. Therefore, damage
resultinq from snow is the responsibility of the resident. Items
which have not been staked in accordance with City policy are
also the responsibility of the resident.
'rhe City will repair, replace, or reimburse the resident in those
instances where the City is liable. The City will have the choice
of whether to repair or replace; and will only reimburse the cost
of materials in instances where it is in the City's best
interest. Lawn damage will be repaired by top dressing and
seeding. In no case will the City undertake or pay for sodding.
in instances where the resident and the Public Works Department
disagree about the source of damage and the responsibility
therefore, the clerk -Administrator will determine the issue.
Appeals of his decision will be handled by the City Council.
(;F�SSPONSIBILITIES OF ER SM NTS
Snow storms create numerous problems and inconveniences. This
policy has identified streets, sidewalks, parking lots, and ice
rinks that the City will clear. The residents also have certain
responsibilities. These include clearing their own driveways and
private sidewalks, clearing areas for trash cans, clearing areas
around mail boxes and/or newspaper delivery tubes, and clearing
around fire hydrants adjacent to their property. These areas
should be cleared without depositing any snow onto the streets.
There mist also be no large piles which obstruct vision of
driveways or walks. Trash cans must not be placed on the street
surfaces. In the case of clearing fire hydrants, the City will
consider clearing these for residents not physically able to do
so. Residents must request this service form the Public Works
Foreman, and the Foreman shall determine who is eligible.
should the city need to clear away tall piles of snow for safe
sight distance at driveways or walks, the resident responsible
may be billed at overtime rates for this work. The city will not
clear private drives or walks except in emergency situations as
determined by the Clerk -Administrator.
Snow plowing operations can cause additional snow to be deposited
in driveway approaches and around roadside obstacles. operators
are instructed to attempt to minimize these incidents, but it is
not practical to eliminate this situation. Residents should be
aware that they may have to clear their driveways a second time
after their street has been plowed. only in extraordinary
circumstances will the City consider clearing driveway
approaches, and this will only be done at the authorization of
the Clerk -Administrator.
Ml4EIAINT PHOCh UM
Complaints regarding snow and ice control or damage shall be
taken during normal working hours and handled in accordance with
the City's normal complaint procedure. High priority complaints
(those involving access to property or problems requiring
immediate attention) shall be handled on a priority basis.
Response time should not exceed 24 hours for any complaint. It
should be understood that complaint responses are to insure that
the provisions of this policy have been fulfilled and that all
residents of the City have been treated uniformly. complaints
regarding the provisions of this policy may not be satisfied with
the initial response. it is the City's intention to log all
complaints and upgrade this policy as necessary and in
consideration of the constraints of our resources.