Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1992/07/27 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL JULY 27, 1992 7:00 P.M. AGENDA The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by staff and appointed commissions, committees and boards. Decisions are based on this information, as well as City policy and practices, input from constituents and a Councilmember's personal judgement. If you have comments, questions or information regarding an item on the agenda, please step forward to be recognized by the Mayor during the "Residents Requests and Comments From the Floor" item on the agenda. Please state your name and address for the record. All comments are appreciated. A copy of all printed materials relating to the agenda item is available for public inspection at the Recording Secretary's Table. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL - Linke Rickaby Blanchard Quick Wuori 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 13, 1992 Regular Meeting COUNCIL ACTION: A T D AGENDA PAGE TWO JULY 27, 1992 5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: A. Adoption and Presentation of Resolution No. 4257 Commending Peter Szurek for Re-finishing Woodcrest Park Building COUNCIL ACTION: B. Adoption and Presentation of Resolution No. 4256 Commending Bryan Rife for the Construction of a --------- -------- --------- ---- landscape Bor er-Around the Horses ioe Courts at - Silver View Park COUNCIL ACTION: C. Update on Long Lake Road Project 6. RESIDENTS REOUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR Citizens' comments are encouraged to allow individual citizens to address the Council, as a whole, on a matter of interest or concern to the citizens. The preservation of the Citizens' Comments item on the agenda is important in order to encourage and maintain this information flow. To preserve and protect this valuable communications link, a speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7: 05 p.m. - To consider a Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Residential Dog Kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive, Planning Case No. 338-91, Staff Report 92-325C Consideration of Resolution No. 4260, Request for Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Residential Dog Kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: AGENDA PAGE FOUR JULY 27, 1992 8. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Set Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m. , August 10, 1992 for Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Accessory Building, 2454 County Road H2 Staff Report No. 92-329C B. Adopt Resolution No. 4258 Authorizing the Purchase of a Plain Paper Fax Machine, Staff Report No. 92- C. Adopt Resolution No. 4264 Designating a Portion of the Fund Balance of the General Fund, Staff Report No. 92-331C D. Adopt Resolution No. 4259 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds E. Licenses for Approval Sewer and Water - Expires 6/30/93 Northern Plumbing and Heating, Inc. - New Larson Plumbing, Inc. - Renewal Asphalt — Expires 6/30/92 Northern Asphalt, Inc. - Renewal COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 9. • COUNCIL BUSINESS: A. Discussion of Request by Mounds View Antiques to Allow Off-Site Signage, Staff Report No. 92-332C COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: AGENDA PAGE FIVE JULY 27, 1992 B. Consideration of Resolution No. 4265 Approving the Final Plat for Harstad Companies, Staff Report No. 92-333C COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: C. Consideration of Resolution No. 4263 Approving the Transfer of Ownership of North Central Cable Communications Corporation, Staff Report No. 92-334C COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: D. Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing for 7: 05 p.m. , August 24, 1992 to Consider an Ordinance Approving an Electrical Energy Franchise Agreement with Northern States Power (NSP) , Staff Report No. 92-335C COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: E. Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing for 7: 10 p.m. , August 24, 1992 to Consider an Ordinance Approving a Gas Energy Franchise Agreement with Northern States Power (NSP) , Staff Report No. 92-336C COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: APPROVED • • PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting July 27, 1992 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 CALL TO ORDER lik Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor Linke at 7: 00 p.m. Monday, July 27, 1992. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was said. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Rickaby, Blanchard, Quick, Wuori and Mayor Linke. MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, Ric Minetor, Public Works Director/City Engineer, Paul Harrington, City Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MOTION/SECOND: Rickaby/Blanchard to approve July 13, 1992 minutes as amended. Councilmember Rickaby made a correction to the vote on page 18 and to the vote on page 21 making each of them read 4 ayes and 1 nay. . IIIVOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council Page Two Regular Meeting July 27, 1992 411 SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Quick to adopt Resolution No. 4257 Commending Peter Szurek for Refinishing Woodcrest Park Building Mayor Linke read Resolution No. 4257 Commending Peter Szurek for Refinishing the Woodcrest Park Building. VOTE: �y-es y� Motion Carried Mayor Linke presented the above referenced resolution of commendation to Peter Szurek and thanked him on behalf of the residents of the City for his work in the repair and repainting of Woodcrest Park building as his project for an Eagle Scout Award. MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Wuori to adopt Resolution No. 4256 Commending Bryan Rife for Construction of a Landscape Border Around the Horseshoe Courts at Silver View Park Mayor Linke read Resolution No. 4256 Commending Bryan Rife for Construction of a Landscape Border Around the Horseshoe Courts at • Silver View Park. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Linke presented the above referenced resolution of commendation to Bryan Rife and thanked him on behalf of the residents of the City for his work in the construction of a timber landscape border for the horseshoe courts at Silver View Park. • Update on Lona Lake Road Project: It was noted by Mayor Linke that Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer had left work ea-r-l-y—today because of illness. Mr. Minetor was called back to work and is on his way in. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, asked if the Council would accept the comments that normally would be given at this time after the Long Lake Road Update. Mayor Linke assured Mr. McCarty that the Council would hear the comments from the residents after the Long Lake Road Update presentation by Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer. S lipcds View City Council Page Three lar Meeting July 27, 1992 PUBLIC HEARINGS: Mayor Linke opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. to consider a request for a conditional use permit to allow a residential dog kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive. Paul Harrington, City Planner reviewed Staff Report No.. 92-325C regarding a Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Establishment of a Residential Dog Kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive. Chapter 40.10 SubdivisionD (4) of the Mounds View Municipal Code allows for dog/cat kennels of not more than four (4) animals in residential zone districts with a conditional use permit. The applicants property is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The application indicates that four (4) dogs will be kept on-site. Councilmember Wuori asked where on the site the dog kennel would be located. Harrington responded that the entire site is dealt with as the site. This is not a kennel as we know it with a concrete slab and a fence around it. Councilmember Rickaby asked the applicant how many barking dog complaints 141 been received. Mary Niezgocki, applicant, stated that on two occasions there were complaints made. There was one complaint in 1990 and one in 1991. Both incidents involved puppies. The applicant said she had kenneled the dogs outside for the day and forgot to bring them in and the neighbors had a party which upset the dogs. There have been no more complaints. There will be four dogs at this location, two adults and two puppies. One of the adult dogs, which was a puppy at the time of one of the barking complaints, has been debarked and can no longer make noise. Niezgocki stated that the person who had made the complaints had also signed the petition for the kennel. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Quick Blanchard to adopt Resolution No. 4260 Approving a Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Establishment of a Residential Dog Kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Linke opened the public hearing at 7: 16 p.m. to consider Denying a Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Establishment of a Residential Dog Kennel at 5200 Jeffrey Drive loll Harrington, City Planner, reviewed the staff report and request to deny onditional use permit to allow a residential dog kennel at 5200 Jeffrey Drive. Harrington stated the Planning Commission recommended denial of Mounds View City Council Page Four Regular Meeting July 27, 1992 this Conditional Use Permit based upon the fact that control and restraint of the animals continues to be a problem on the proposed kennel site. Police reports filed on the property relating to the dogs kept on site were attached to this report. Harrington had received two letters that he read into the minutes (attached) . The letters were from Gary Olson, 5209 O'Connell Drive, dated July 14, 1992, stating his opposition to the granting of the Conditional Use Permit. The other letter was from Mark and Debbie Gavett, 5210 Jeffrey Drive, received July 23, 1992, stating their opposition to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit to the applicant as they already have four sheds and a large stir,mm;ng pool in their backyard (attached) . The letter further stated that the signatures obtained on the petition were from people who lived far enough away from the property that they were not aware of the bitings or would care about the looks or smell of the property. LaDean Norton, 5209 Jeffrey Drive, (across from the property) stated that there has been trouble with the dogs in the past and he was in opposition of the granting of a residential kennel on this property. Mark Gavett, 5210 Jeffrey Drive, stated that he has three small children and a couple of times the bus driver had to escort the children to the door rather than drop them off because the dogs were outside.. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. • Applicant was not in attendance at the Council Meeting. MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Rickaby to Adopt Resolution No. 4261 to Deny a Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Establishment of a Residential Dog Kennel at 5200 Jeffrey Drive VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Linke opened the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. to Consider a Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Allow an Oversized Accessory Structure at 7074 Knollwood Drive. Paul Harrington, City Planner, reviewed the staff report and request regarding this oversized accessory structure to be constructed in the applicant's rear yard. Harrington stated this request meets the City's zoning requirements for size of structure. Harrington read into the minutes a letter from Gordon and Shirley Johnson, copy attached, concerning potential water runoff problems that may develop from the roof of a building this size. A request was made by the Johnsons that there would be adequate grading so water runoff would not be a problem if the request for this oversized building is granted. Mounds View City Council Page Five 11lar MeetingJuly 27, 1992 Harrington further stated that he was unable to get ahold of the applicant, but he stated a grading plan could be provided and, in his opinion, the letter was more of a concern than a criticism to deny the Conditional Use Permit. Pat Stampfle, applicant, stated that the grading was part of his plan and that he would grade so the Johnsons would not have undue runoff from the roof of this building. Mayor Linke stated thatsometimes in the past the City had asked that the applicant remove the door so the old garage could not be used as a garage. The Planning Commission has asked that a driveway to the exiting building be removed to assure that it is not used as a garage. Harrington stated that old collector cars could be stored in this building, but not a licensed vehicle. Richard Hedin, 8040 Long Lake Road, asked what the size would be of the oversized accessory building and what is the size of the existing building. Harrington stated the new building would be 780 square feet and the existing garage is 286 square feet. •ncilmember Rickaby asked what the existing driveway was composed of. Stampfle stated it was blacktop. Councilmember Rickaby stated this should help the runoff problem in that impervious surface was being removed. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Rickaby to adopt Resolution No. 4262 Approving the Request by Patrick Stampfle for a Conditional Use Permit to Allow An Oversized Accessory Building on Their 'Property at 70-74 Rnol-l.wood Drive VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried ' Mayor Linke opened the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. to consider the 1992 Long Term Financial Plan. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed the steps taken by the City Council in formulating the 1992 Long Term Financial Plan and its use in the budgetary process. Orduno stated that there had been Council Work Sessions in June and July with regard to this Plan and that a copy of the document has been in City Hall for public review. Orduno explained that this /b current is used as a window to take a look at the needs of the community er the next five years. Mounds View City Council Page-Six Regular Meeting July 27, 1992 • Mayor Linke also stated that this document is not cast in concrete and that it can change. This plan looks at future needs but sometimes changes. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:29 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Blanchard to accept the first reading of Ordinance No. 513 Adopting the 1992 Long Term Financial Plan. and waive the reading. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor ated_that the second reading would be scheduled for the next regularly scheduled Council Meeting. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Linke introduced the Consent Agenda. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, read the Consent Agenda. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to adopt the Consent Agenda as presented. _ VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried COUNCIL BUSINESS: • A. Paul Harrington reviewed Staff Report No. 92-321C regarding a Request by Mounds View Antiques to Allow Off-Site Signage. Mounds View Antiques is requesting Council approval for the location of a sign on property other than that upon which their business is being conducted. Harrington stated that the Minnesota Rental Sign exceeds square footage as our code is written, but some of their signs predate our ordinance. Councilmember Blanchard asked if the applicant was in the audience. Applicant was not in attendance. Councilmember Blanchard stated that this item could not be worksd on because-the-C-ounel-did . . - - - , * location of the sign being requested. Councilmember Wuori stated that if their signs exceed requirements, at this time the signs be brought up to code. Councilmember Blanchard stated that the Sands Apartments requested signage that exceeded the code and would be placed on someone else's property and was turned down by a previous Council. Paul Harrington, City Planner, stated that there was no history that could be found of the City allowing this signage. Mounds View City Council Page Seven 11Oular Meeting July 27, 1992 Mayor Linke asked the Councilmembers if they would be okay with holding off on this item until near the end of the meeting_ The item would not be officially tabled. The applicant may have assumed the meeting would be long like the last meeting and would come later. Councilmember Wuori stated she had no problem with moving the item to later if some action were formally taken before the end of the meeting. Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, joined the meeting at approximately 8:00 p.m. Mayor Linke asked Mr. Minetor at this time to present his update on Long Lake Road. Mayor Linke stated there were some residents in the audience who had concerns with what size the sidewalk would be. Minetor stated the following with regards to Long Lake Road: • Williams Pipeline Company will put new pipeline from County Road H to south of County Road J. The pipeline will be placed three feet within the right-of-way which will improve safety conditions. The pipe should be delivered this week and Williams will begin this week or • next. • Northern States Power (gas) is behind schedule as they have just begun work. ▪ Until Williams Pipeline and Northern States Power finish the utility work Schaeffer Construction, general road contractor, can't begin their work. Schaeffer will not begin their work for two to three weeks. This is a two year project. Some work will be done this summer and some next summer. The County Road H2 and County Road I watermain crossing on Highway 10 is scheduled to be put in this year. The plans approved and bisd on are for a 71-sidewalk. The 7' sidewalk would be on the west side of T.ong Lake Road. Normally when sidewalks are installed they are 5' wide on both sides of the road. With the sidewalk only on wide side the extra width is needed for safety purposes with bicycles and walkers. 7' is only two feet wider than the standard sidewalk. Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, stated that he objects to the 7' wide sidewalk. Most of the neighbors that he has spoken to don't have a problem with the sidewalk. Mr. McCarty indicated that his wife is in favor of the sidewalk, infact. Mr. McCarty stated he understands that for maintenance and equipment the width is 410 needed. Mr. McCarty stated that he knows this Council will not be around forever and if the next Council comes in and chooses to no Mounds View City Council Page Eight Regular Meeting July 27, 1992 longer maintain the sidewalks (snow removal) the homeowner would have or pay the consequences. A 5' sidewalk is wide enough to shovel. Mr. McCarty also stated that he has concerns with removing some of the old trees that are 30 and 40 years old. Removing the old trees will remove much of the ambience of the boulevards on Long Lake Road. Mr. McCarty asked the Council to revisit the entire subject. Mayor Linke asked what the sidewalk width was on Long Lake Road in New Brighton. Minetor stated he thought it was either 5' or 6' , but he wasn't certain. Richard Hedin, 8040 Long Lake Road, asked why the City had to put in a 7' sidewalk when they could widen the road and put in a bicycle lane and then add a standard sidewalk and there would not be as many trees lost. Mr. Hedin has planted approximately 50 on his own lot. Mr. Hedin stated that they add to the beauty of the neighborhood. Mayor Linke stated that by making the sidewalk 5' and not 7' it would not save that many more trees. Mr. Hedin stated that most kids will ride on the road, not on the sidewalk. The speed limit on that road is 30 miles per hour • because of the kids that ride bikes on that road. There are a lot of children on Long Lake Road. At night, it sounds like a dragstrip. Mr. Hedin suggested to keep the speed limit at 30 and police it a little heavier on weekends and evenings to keep down the traffic. Mr. Hedin stated, in his opinion, a 7' sidewalk is stupid. Minetor stated the east side of the road cannotbe reduced because of the pipeline. Minetor stated that he and the City Forester went out and looked at all the tree sites in question. Even if the sidewalk was reduced to 5' , 2' wouldn't save trees. Minetor further stated that if a bike lane were put in, Long Lake Road would become no parking on the bike lane and the width would have to be increased by 4' . Many children do ride in the street, but in his opinion, he doesn't feel it's safe on a collector street. Minetor stated that he agreed with the residents. There are many nice trees along Long Lake Road. Minetor stated that he and the Forester did what they could to save what trees they could. Many trees on the east side have to be removed so that Williams Pipeline can dig with a backhoe. The trees would have to be trimmed back 20' and in some cases this wouldn't leave much of a tree. Also from the liability aspect, these trees could blow over in a storm with half of their root base cut off. • Mounds View City Council Page-Nine Replar Meeting July 27, 1992 Minetor stated by adjusting the sidewalk, possibly two more trees may be• saved. Mayor Linke asked if they had met with the residents and explained the situation to them. Minetor stated that they had met with as many residents who came in or called. Mayor Linke stated that the Forester is in on Tuesdays. Any resident who has special problems should contact Ric to set up a meeting and go over their individual case. Dave Lawrence, 8530 Long Lake Road asked what the white x's were on the trees. Minetor stated that these are trees that, in the beginning, looked like they could be saved. It was determined, however, that these trees have to be taken because of Williams Pipeline. Minetor explained the requirements regarding the shifting of the center line of the roadway.III - Dave Lawrence could understand sidewalks on Quincy and County Road I as they are busy roads. Councilmember Wuori stated that Long Lake Road is also a busy road. Councilmember Wuori also stated that where there are sidewalks in the City they are being heavily used. Dave Lawrence stated that the trees that would be cut around will reroot in two years. Minetor stated that a reason for not doing this is liability. One concern is that a tree that had been severely trimmed could go through a house during a storm. The tree being discussed would have to be trimmed back 20' and this would not leave much of a tree. Mr. Lawrence stated that his white pine is 35 to 40 years old. ' and it could go up to 50. Mr. Lawrence stated that the City could have the other pines as he does not want to loose them either. Minetor stated that in a natural location that tree could grow up to 50' . The Forester indicated it would not be a good idea to try to save it. 0 Mr. Lawrence stated that if the tree dies, he will cut it down. Mounds View City Council Page Ten Regular Meeting July 27, 1992 tree dies due to a project, government Minetor stated that when a usually ends up removing the dead tree. Mayor Linke stated that Mr. Lawrence should meet with Ric Minetor and the City Forester. Minetor stated that there would have to be a complete waiver of liability if the tree would be left standing with one half of the roots cut off. Mayor Linke stated that Mr. Lawrence should give Ric his name, phone number and address. Councilmember Blanchard asked Ric Minetor, if after talking to the homeowners, are most of the homeowners adamant about keeping trees? Minetor stated that most of the residents understand the reasoning behind the tree removal. Sharon Croon, 8475 Eastwood Road, stated she and her husband were not informed of what was going on with Long Lake Road. They received no letter in the spring. Stakes appeared in her backyard and she spoke to Jim. Jim told her not to worry until next year about the stakes and what was going on. Then stakes appeared way into the easement and she became very concerned. The City will not get her bushes. A few years back Long Lake Road took half of her backyard. Ms. Croon understood that the City would give homeowners $150 to use the property. She and her husband gave permission. Ms. Croon stated that her bushes are not going and the big oak will • not go. Ms. Croon said she would blow up the place before they could take the tree. Croon states she has a bad relationship with Mounds View. Croon doesn't want to lose bushes or cottonwood. Ms. Croon stated that she was told this easement would be used for a temporary road. Mr. and Mrs. Croon gave their permission to use their property as a construction zone. The gentleman who showed me the plans said the sidewalk would be a 4' sidewalk. This gentleman is telling the same thing to all the other residents. He has plans in his truck that show a 4' sidewalk. M-i-net-or asked-that she-give-him the man's name. Minetor explained sat the Cit had hired Evergreen Land Service. Minetor.further explained that there were wo a. .re - - • • but were sent to .the service who was doing negotiations with the residents and were on the mailing labels. Minetor stated that he had met with Mr. Croon and explained the situation to him. The meeting was fairly congenial. The bushes that Ms. Croon is referring to are planted in County right-of-way. Minetor stated that he offered to scoop the bushes up with the front end loader and place the bushes to the back of construction zone and they could be replanted. Minetor further stated that the City would not then level the backstop. The portion of the plantings in the right-of way will have to come out. Mounds View City Council Page Eleven filar Meeting July 27, 1992 Minetor further stated that their property would not have to be touched if the homeowners decided they wanted nothing in their yard bothered, however, their yard would be steeper from the sidewalk to the property instead of a gentle slope. Ms. Croon said that she has been taking care of this corner for 16 years and perhaps now she should charge the City of Mounds View. Minetor stated that for the past two years a 4' sidewalk has never been discussed. It has always been a 7' sidewalk. Minetor again said he would like the gentleman's name and he will talk to his boss at Evergreen. Mayor Linke stated this is an issue that cannot be solved tonight but Ric should meet with the Forester, construction supervisor, Evergreen and the Croons to come to some understanding of what is happening. Duane McCarty stated that the County just completed a comprehensive plan for a bike trail system in the Metropolitan area. He would like to trade some ideas with the system and share some expertise • on how decisions were made for this trail system. Minetor stated Schaefer Construction will be delayed approximately 3 weeks. If they have made adjustments to their schedule, he doesn't have any exact dates. McCarty stated that there is a good chancethat there would be enough time for the County and the City to meet and trade information and then perhaps hold a public informational meeting. Nick Mosgow, 8330 Long Lake Road, who lives across from Ardan Park, asked why the road couldn't be moved over a couple of feet to the park side to save a few more trees. Minetor responded that if the road is moved toward Ardan, more trees will be lost in Ardan Park. This would be the only area where it may be possible to look at the situation regarding loss of trees. Mosgow stated that most persons care more about the trees on their own property than they do about the trees in Ardan Park. Mayor Linke stated those trees make a good buffer and shield from the compost center. Minetor stated there could become a concern with regard in the curves in the roadway. Curves have to be at a minimum radius. 111 Mounds View City Council Page Twelve Regular Meeting July 27,. 1992 Counci].member Blanchard stated that one and one half years ago 411 public hearings were held and maps showing what would be done were posted in the Chambers. People didn't pay much attention at that time because it was for something in the future. Now that it is happening everyone is concerned. Blanchard feels the City should again meet with the people and explain why a 7' sidewalk is being constructed rather than a 5' sidewalk. What width is New Brighton's sidewalk? If 7' gives more credence, if less we can look at that too. B. Paul Harrington reviewed Staff Report No. 92-333 . (Resolution No. 4265) Harrington stated that on July 13, 1992 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 4253 part of which approved the preliminary plat of Greenfield Estates. Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 42 requires that all major subdivisions be approved at both the preliminary and final plat stage. Kay Weseman, 7807 Bona Road, asked if before the Council approved thefinal plat should the wetland alteration map be approved? Paul Harrington responded that the action before the Council is strictly approving the major subdivision. Mayor Linke stated that this final plat approval is approving the property lines for each lot. The final plat approval indicates that• the developer meets the code for the type of development to be undertaken and for "x" amount of homes to be constructed. Paul Harrington, City Planner, explained that all other parts of the development were approved and do not require additional action. Harrington stated that a major subdivision requires a first reading of the final plat. Harrington further explained that by granting approval of the subdivision that the City isn't giving the developer rights to build. Kay Weseman, asked if-the-wetland-delneation was already approved and if the maps have the new wetland boundary and asked who the maps were drawn by. Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that the maps showing the new wetland delineation will not be complete for he the 3 to 6 monthsof�NaturalMinetor stated that Resources, thetCorpspofaup by Department Engineers Peter Sabee of Barr Engineering. Kay Weseman stated that it was her understanding that the wetland map alteration needed to be a single item by itself with a public hearing being held and a 4/5 vote by the Council for approval. I Mounds View City Council Page Thirteen agular Meeting July 27, 1992 Weseman did not understand that this could be done as part of• a package. Mayor Linke stated that many times these development items are combined. Mayor Linke explained the process to Ms. Weseman and of how some things on a resolution need 4/5 vote while others do not and, therefore, some things could be approved while others in the same proposed resolution might not be. Mayor Linke stated that this type of process had been used with Sysco and Mounds View Business Park South. -Kay Weseman asked the City Council to reconsider the approval of the development. Weseman stated that a Councilmember at a previous meeting even stated concern with people having a wetland in their backyard. Weseman used an example of the upset residents tonight not knowing that there were County easements in their yard so they planted trees and bushes and now the City is coming in and taking them. Duane McCarty, stated that he missed some of the nuances at the public hearing held on this subject and he had an interest in the City Charter and the Wetland Ordinance. Mr. McCarty wanted clarification that the Wetland Preservation Map was amended by a • 4/5 vote by resolution. Mr. McCarty felt that the Wetland Ordinance could only be changed by ordinance. McCarty stated the City should have this looked into by the City Attorney. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, stated that in an off-the- cuff conversation with the City Attorney earlier today this issue came up. It was the City Attorney's opinion that the ordinance could be changed by resolution if the resolution were proposing the entire development by a 4/5 vote. Orduno stated that the 4/5 vote was the important factor. The City Attorney is going to look into this further and get back to the City. R c-Minetor quoted-a-section of the-code which statid that the code does not require an ordinance to change the map, but a 4/5 majority vote. Mayor Linke stated that the City will get a legal opinion. Kay Weseman stated her concern with the fact that the persons who received the Greenfield Estates Proposal for Development flyer did not understand that the City was going to make a major change to a wetland boundary. Weseman stated that perhaps in the future the City Council could do this by holding a separate public hearing and giving notice. Councilmember Rickaby stated that she has concerns with allowing persons to have wetlands in their yard and allowing them to build Mounds View City Council Page Fourteen Regular Meeting July 27, 1992 on them. Rickaby described a couple of scenarios that happened in the ll City as a result of persons building on wetlands or non-stable soil too close to a wetland. MOTION! : Rickaby to Deny the Final Plat Approval for Harstad Companies. Motion failed due to lack of a second. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Linke to approve Final Plat for Harstad Companies. 4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried C. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed Staff Report No. 92-334C regarding the transfer of ownership of the North Central Cable Communications Corporation. Orduno stated that the attached resolution must adopt to give formal approval of the proposed transfer of ownership of North Central Cable Communications Corporation to Meredith/New Heritage Strategic Partners. The transfer of ownership has been approved by the North Suburban Cable Commission and is now dependent upon the approval of all participating cities. Orduno stated that also attached to this resolution is the Commission's Attorney's opinion on the sale. According the Commission the sale will not fundamentally change the current status of cable operations or increase the cost of cable subscriptions. 111 MOTION/SECOND: Rickaby/Blanchard to Adopt Resolution No. 4263 Approving the Transfer of Ownership of North Central Cable Communications Corporation 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried D. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator reviewed Staff Report No. 92-335C regarding the setting of a public hearing for August 24, 1992 at 7:05 to consider an ordinance approving an electrical energy franchise agreement with Northern States Power. Orduno stated that last-fall-the City Council held a public hearing and considered an ordinance which would establish a franchise fee of up to 4% on Northern States Power's gross operating gas and electric revenues as permitted under the Franchise Agreement with NSP. A major concern of the residents and Council was that NSP would hold the funds collected for one year. The City under this franchise agreement would receive the funds monthly. The provision of the franchise allowed for NSP to collect and retain the fee for a full year before paying the City. This provision was a major issue of concern to residents who attended the public hearing and members of the Council. Council directed staff to pursue a new franchise agreement which NSP which would provided for monthly payments of the franchise fees. All new Mounds View City Council Page Fifteen alar Meeting July 27, 1992 • franchise fee agreements for gas and electrical energy have been negotiated and provide for the desired payment schedule.. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to Set a Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m. on August 24, 1992 to Consider an Ordinance Approving an Electrical Energy Franchise Agreement with Northern States Power. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried E. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, gave information in last item to also cover this item. • MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to set a public hearing for 7:10 p.m. on August 24, 1992, to Consider an Ordinance Approving a Gas Energy Franchise Agreement with Northern States Power 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried F. Samantha Orduno reviewed Staff Report No. 92-337C regarding the setting of a public hearing for 7:15 p.m. on August 24, 1992 to consider an ordinance implementing a franchise fee on gas and electric utilities. Orduno stated that over the past several • years cities have experienced declining revenues due to such factors as State cuts to Local Government Aid, reductions in residential and commercial/industrial property tax rates, reduced investment earnings, less construction and development resulting in declines in permit fees and now a recession that is further exacerbating an already dangerous situation. The consequences of this dilemma is the move toward user fees, franchise fees and other non-property tax revenues. A franchise fee is an example of a user fee based revenue program imposed on a company conducting business for profit within the City limits. The City currently has a franchise agreement with North Central Cable. The Cable Company conducts business in the City and for that privilege, the company pays the City a franchise fee of 5% to be used only for the City's municipal cable operations. Councilmember Rickaby stated that these methods are just property tax raises in disguise and that by doing it this way it is an attempt to avoid the clamber of people coming in to make comments about the City raising people's taxes. The people have the right to these comments. Mayor Linke stated that he takes exception. to Councilmember Rickaby's statement with regard to avoiding the clamber of people coming to the hearings. Mayor Linke feels these franchise methods would aid in buying down property tax increases for the homeowner. These fees are controllable by the homeowner as they are based on electric and gas usage. The churches and schools, who pay no taxes, will now share in this burden. Linke stated that for many years people Mounds View City Council Page Sixteen Regular Meeting July 27, 1992 have been coming in and he listens to them. Mayor Linke stated after 41/ advertising the budget meetings he was hoping to see people attend, however, no one showed up. Councilmember Rickaby stated that this was a statement publicly made at the meetings. MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Linke to approve setting a public hearing for 7:15 p.m. , August 24, 1992, to consider an ordinance implementing a franchise fee on gas and electric utilities 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried G. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed Staff Report No. 92-338C regarding the designation of the St. Paul Pioneer Press as the City's Second Legal Paper. Orduno stated that it would be advantageous for the City to have a daily paper as a back-up to the City's weekly paper in the case that deadlines that couldn't be accomplished in a weekly could be met by a daily paper. Councilmember Rickaby stated that she has a problem with putting legal notices in a daily paper because many of the residents do not receive daily papers. Rickaby further stated that she noticed that she sees many more Star and Tribune boxes than she does St. Paul Pioneer Press boxes in the area. This would require that the residents purchase daily a daily newspaper and those who didn't wouldn't be aware of the legal notice. The City has two local newspapers which are free.' If back-up is needed, it would make sense to place it in the other free newspaper where more residents would read it. Mayor Linke stated that sometimes there is a necessity to meet a 10 day deadline and a weekly paper cannot accomplish this. Orduno stated it is rare that the City would have to use the back up paper, but most cities do have one. Councilmember Wuori stated that if, inadvertently, there would be a problem With the local paper not publishing a legal and there is a 10 day notice period, the daily paper could run it right away and the City could still meet its deadline. This would mean that a public hearing or informational meeting would not have to be postponed or rescheduled. Orduno further stated that the City of Mounds View also receives coverage from the St. Paul Pioneer Press and receives no coverage from the Minneapolis Star and Tribune. Councilmember Rickaby stated that it is a waste of money because the St. Paul Pioneer Press would not reach all homes as the M ands View City Council Page Seventeen lar Meeting July 27, 1992 two local, free newspapers do. More persons would read the two, free newspapers. This, in her opinion, is a waste of money to the City. MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Blanchard to designate the St. Paul Pioneer Press as the City's Second Legal Paper 4 ayes 1 nays Motion Carried REPORT OF COUNCILMEMBERS: Councilmember Rickabv - No report. Councilmember Quick - No report. Councilmember Blanchard had no report but asked for an update on the licensing of Waste Management of Blaine. Orduno responded with a general update on the fact that Waste Management of Blaine had met with her and shared their concerns about when the customer list would become public information. Blaine Waste Management has contracts in other cities and those cities did • not require the list as part of their licensing requirements. Blaine Waste Management was given a 14 day extension to submit their list and they did submit it reluctantly. Orduno stated that the State passes mandates on to the cities but does not tell the City how to implement the mandate. Orduno offered a suggestion that the City, like many of the other cities, follow Fridley's lead and pass an ordinance requiring that all commercial and residential properties in the city have some form of environmentally safe collection. • This ordinance would have to encompass the seniors who share collection and the employees who work at landfills or wherever that dispose of their solid waste there. Orduno stated that the City could return the customer lists at this time and approve Waste Management of Blaine's license at the next Council meeting so they would not be in violation of the licensing requirement for garbage haulers, and recyclers. Councilmember Blanchard brought up the subject of peddlers selling sweet corn. Councilmember Blanchard stated she understood that if the corn was grown on their property they could sell it with the property owner's permission. Orduno stated that State Law currently requires no licensing of peddlers selling agricultural products. If the product is 0 grown on the peddler's property he can sell it. The State does not provide the City with enforcement. Peddler's are not required to show proof that the land is theirs. This is Mounds View City Council Page Eighteen Regular Meeting July 27, 1992 something that will be brought up to the Legislative Committee 411 of the League of Minnesota Cities. Mayor Linke brought up the peddler selling peaches and the woman selling flowers on Silver Lake Road. There is no way to tell if they are licensed or not unless one stops. Mayor Linke suggested that a bright colored permit be issued to be placed on these stands or sales locations to identify those peddlers who are licensed by the City. Orduno stated that this could be accomplished and staff would work on it. Councilmember Wuori stated that the newer gas stations, such as Superamerica, cannot stack, store or sell anything on the blacktopped surface. Councilmember Wuori asked if Superamerica is being warned and if they are being ticketed for these type of sales. Orduno assured Councilmember Wuori that this was happening. Councilmember Wuori reported that "Camelot" opened last weekend. It was a beautiful performance.• There are seats available for Thursday, Friday, Saturday evening, and Sunday matinee performances. Thursday , the performance will be signed for the hearing :impaired. 9. A. Item postponed at beginning of meeting in :hopes that the • applicant might show up for the request for signage for: Mounds View Antiques Councilmember Quick stated that the City Council has tried twice to handle this item. • MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to Deny Request for Mounds View Antiques to Allow Off-Site Signage Councilmember Rickaby stated concerns about the requested property being-over-signed-now. Mayor Linke concurred. Councilmember Blanchard states that the ordinance does not allow this off-site signage. Paul Harrington, City Planner, stated that the code allows for special permit to be given out by the City Council for location and size. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried I Mounds View City Council Page Nineteen llar Meeting July 27, 1992 Mayor Linke's Report: 1. The City Council met with Samantha Orduno, City Administrator and conducted her performance review as per her contract with the City. All items were satisfactory or above. Councilmember Rickaby was not in attendance due to her employment. Council reviewed the wage scale and would ask to fix the salary for Orduno at $61,229.40 commencing July 1, 1992 in accordance with her contract. MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Quick to approve a wage increase for Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, to $61,229.40 commencing July 1, 1992 in accordance with the terms of her contract with the City. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 2. Mayor Linke attended "Camelot". Linke stated that he has attended for the past nine opening nights of the Mounds View Community Theater's performances. 411 Councilmember Quick stated it was a top notch production. 3 . Mayor. Linke stated that the Irondale Marching Knights had participated in the Aquatennial and Torchlight parades as well as the Lion's parade in Rochester. The band will be marching in the National Legion's parade. Mayor Linke stated that, in his opinion, this was the best marching band in the state. Councilmember Quick stated that this is because of the dedication of staff and quality of dedication of parents and quality of the students and their dedication to the band and Report of Administrator: Orduno welcomed Bill Frits back. She stated that everyone notices when he isn't there and they begin asking about him. The City needs people like Bill to keep them on their toes and receive public input. Welcome back! Bill Frits thanked the City staff for the card he received when he was in the hospital and also, that he is feeling much better 40 now. Mounds View City Council Page Twenty Regular Meeting July 27, 1992 There being no further business before the Council, Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 9:32 p.m. Respectfully .submitted, \41-1-/-4.4266—X--) Depu y Clerk • • • Agenda Section: 9.A 11 706 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-332C STAFF REPORT Report Date: 7-23-92 MUn Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE July 27. 1997 ❑ Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda a Council Business Item Description: Continued Discussion of Request by Mounds View Antiques to Allow Off—Site Signage Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary) — SUMMARY: This item was originally scheduled for discussion by the Council at the July 13, 1992 meeting. However, due to the length of that meeting, representatives of Mounds View Antiques asked that it be tabled to the August 10 meeting. Please find attached a copy of the staff report that you received prior to the July 13 meeting. If you have any additional questions, feel free to give me a call. Pffdi Harrington, Cit/Planner RECOMMENDATION; • Agenda Section: 9.1 ODUNDS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-371 C STAFF REPORT Report Date: 7-9-92 E0 Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE July 13, 1992 0 Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda a Council Business Item Description: Discussion of Request By Mounds View Antiques to Allow Off—Site Storage Administrator's Review/Recommendation: -�J - No comments to supplement this report �I. - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach-supplement -neeesaar3.) SUMMARY; Amelia Gislason, manager of Mounds View Antiques, has recently contacted City staff regarding the placement of off-site directional signage within the vicinity of Highway 10 and County Road H. Ms. Gislason has informed staff that she has had preliminary discussions with Minnesota Rent-All, 2190 Highway 10, regarding the placement of a directional sign on their property. Mounds View Municipal Code Chapter 39, "Signs and Billboards", only allows signs to advertise businesses "located on the premises. " However, Chapter 39 also allows for signs "of unusual height, size, design or location . . . " with City Council approval. Mounds View Antiques is requesting Council approval for the location of a sign on property other than that upon which their business is being conducted. Representatives of Mounds View Antiques will be in attendance at the Monday Evening meeting to further discuss this issue. Specific size and location of the sign will be provided at that time. ____ ... ---// i• / (-- Paul Harrington, Cit Planner RECOMMENDATION; Approval or denial of this request can be made by motion of the Council. Agenda Section: 9.B 11 ONEW REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-333C STAFF REPORT Report Date: 7-23-92 11, � Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE .T1 y 7 7, 1 99 ❑ Public Hearings u ❑ Consent Agenda KJ Council Business Item Description: Resolution No. 4265 Approving the Final Plat for Harstad Companies Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. _-_- _ ••. -- • ' - " - -- :applement sheets as ngcgasary.) SUMMARY; At the July 13, 1992 City Council meeting, Resolution No. 4253 - part of which approved the preliminary plat of Greenfield Estates - was adopted by the City Council. Mounds View Municipal Code Chapter 42 requires that all major subdivisions be approved at both the preliminary and final plat stage. Attached for your consideration please find City Council Resolution No. 4265 approving the final plat of Greenfield Estates. /7"1.------;<- 7; Paul Harrington, ity Planner RECOMMENDATION; Adopt City Council Resolution No. 4265 approving the final plat of Greenfield Estates and waive the reading. w _ RESOLUTION NO. 4265 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF GREENFIELD ESTATES FOR HARSTAD COMPANIES PLANNING CASE NO. 333-91 WHEREAS, Harstad Companies has requested approval of a final plat major subdivision for the property located Southeast of the intersection of Hil : • - • • • - • •• • - legally - known as: EX W 180 FT OF N 183 FT THE NW 1/4 OF SE 1\4 OF SW 1\4 (SUBJ TO ROADS) IN SEC 5 TN 30 RN 23 WHEREAS, the plat is shown as Attachment A and dated October 25, 1992; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the applicant's request for a major subdivision (that includes 13 single family residential lots) and found that it is in conformance with all applicable sections of the Mounds View Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View approves the final plat major subdivision request by Harstad Companies contingent upon the following: 1. The Applicant record this resolution and a copy of the plat with Ramsey County within 60 days of adoption. 2 . The Applicant pay the park land dedication fee as required in Chapter 42 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. Adopted this-27-th day of July, 1992 .- ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator a Agenda Section: 9.C ounos REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-334C Report Date: 7-2 -97 nil EW STAFF REPORT Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE July 27, 1992 ❑ Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda J7 Council Business Item Description: Resolution No. 4263 Approving the Transfer of Ownership of North Central Cable Communications Corporation Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary{:. : • :. :. •::-: :••• - :: :gecmasary.) ,SUMMARY: Attached is the resolution which the City Council must adopt to give formal approval of the proposed transfer of ownership of North Central Cable Communications Corporation to Meredith/New Heritage Strategic Partners. The transfer of ownership has been approved by the North Suburban Cable Commission and is now dependent upon the approval of all participating cities. Also attached is the Commission's Attorney's opinion on the sale. According to the Commission, the sale will not fundamentally change the current status of cable operations or increase the cost of cable subscriptions. `til)- , F..." - /. Samantha Orduno, City Adm nistrator RECOMMENDATION: Motion to waive the reading and adopt Resolution No. 4263 Approving the Transfer of Ownership of the North Central Cable Communications Corporation RESOLUTION NO. 4263 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF THE NORTH CENTRAL CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION WHEREAS, Hauser Cable of Minnesota, Inc. , a Delaware corporation, Hauser Cable Communications, Inc. , a Delaware corporation, and Continental Cablevision of Minnesota, Inc. , a Minneso - . . . . _fit- •• - - . , . . . ' One Hundred percent (100%) of the outstanding stock of North Central Cable Communications Corporation (hereinafter "North Central") ; and WHEREAS, North Central, by and through Group W Cable of The North Suburbs, Inc. , a wholly owned subsidiary, owns, operates and maintains a cable television system in the City pursuant to the terms and conditions of City Ordinance No. 319, as amended, (hereinafter "Franchise") ; and WHEREAS, through an interim transaction completed on or before December 31, 1991, Transferors' interest in the outstanding stock of North Central was modified so that the stock of Continental Cablevision of Minnesota, Inc. (hereinafter "Continental") , previously 50%, was transferred to result in Continental's ownership of 19 1/2% of the stock with 30 1/2% of the stock owned by NCC Holding No. , Inc. , a Massachusetts Corporation (hereinafter "Holdco") , an entity in which Continental retained all voting stock and transferred non-voting stock in the holding company to Meredith/New Heritage Strategic Partners, L.P. (hereinafter "Transferee") ; and WHEREAS, Transferors desire to sell and otherwise transfer all of their shares of the capital stock of North Central, together with of the voting stock of Holdco, to Transferee, in whom Meredith/New Heritage Partnership will initially hold, as general partner, a 72.73% interest and Continental, a Limited Partner, will initially acquire a 27.27% interest; and WHEREAS, the City has been informed that the ownership interests in Transferee, after taking into account all notes delivered as capital contributions to Transferee, will be 62.1% for Meredith/New Heritage Partnership, general partner and 37.9% for Continental Cablevision of Minnesota, Inc. , Limited Partner; and RESOLUTION NO. 4263 PAGE TWO OF EIGHT WHEREAS, the Transfer Application discloses that Meredith/New Heritage Partnership, which is the general partner of Transferee and holds a 62. 1% ownership interest in Transferee, may in certain circumstances be required or have the right to purchase the limited partnership interest of Continental Cablevision of Minnesota, Inc. subject to the requirements of local, state and federal law; and WHEREAS, Meredith Cable, Inc. ("Meredith Cable") , a wholly- owned subsidiary of Meredith Corporation ("Meredith") , currently holds a 54. 6% ownership interest in Transferee through its 88% ownership of the General Partner of Transferee and has the right to acquire total ownership and management control of both the General Partner and Transferee, subject to the requirements of local, state and federal law; and WHEREAS, the interim transaction has taken place; and WHEREAS, the Transferors have requested the consent from the City to a change in ownership and control of North Central to Transferee; and WHEREAS, City has waived any right of first refusal to purchase the stock acquired by Transferee as such right of first refusal applies to the pending sale and transfer; and WHEREAS, the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission (hereinafter "Commission") has been delegated the authority and responsibility to coordinate, administer and enforce the Cable Communications Franchise Ordinance on behalf of the City pursuant to the terms of a Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the Administration of a Cable Television Franchise; and WHEREAS, the Commission has held public hearings on behalf of City-and-h-hasreviewedthe legal, technical, character and-financial qualifications of Transferee and its general partner Meredith/New Heritage Partnership and finds no reasonable basis to deny the request for transfer as a result of said review, except for those conditions listed below; and WHEREAS, the Commission has recommended to City approval of the transfer of control of North Central to Transferee subject to the actual closing of the stock sale and subject to the conditions listed below; and WHEREAS, the Commission has also recommended approval of a request by Transferee to permit the pledge as security to its lenders of the stock and assets of North Central and its subsidiaries, which would include Group W Cable of The North Suburbs, Inc. ; and RESOLUTION NO. 4263 PAGE THREE OF EIGHT WHEREAS, the City does not object to such security interest in the stock and assets. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mounds View that: 1. The City hereby approves the sale and transfer by Transferors of all of their shares of the capital stock of North Central, together with 11 . - . . : - . - . - - . , - . . ect to an actual closing of the stock sale transaction on or before December 31, 1992, pursuant to the terms and conditions as evidenced by the Notice of Transfer to said Commission and City and all written representations from Transferors, Transferee, Meredith/New Heritage Partnership, its subsidiaries, employees, agents, partners, parent corporations and North Central, and further subject to the terms and conditions of this Resolution. 2. The City approves the pledge by Transferee, Meredith/New Heritage Partnership, and North Central as security to their lenders the stock and assets of North Central and its subsidiaries subject to the terms and conditions of this Resolution. 3. This Resolution constitutes all action and approvals of the City necessary under the City's Franchise for the sale and transfer of control to Transferee. 4. The City's approval of the above named transfer of owneLship of North Central is further conditioned upon the following: a. North Central shall have corrected all technical discrepancies in the cable system of City as delineated in the report of Communications Support Corporation (hereinafter "CSC") No. 92010. 001, and its addendum No. 92010.A01, and as represented as correct pursuant to the letter from Mr. Kevin Griffin to Ms. Coralie Wilson dated June 17, 1992, unless otherwise qualified, below. RESOLUTION NO. 4263 PAGE FOUR OF EIGHT b. North Central and the Commission shall have agreed to waive any and all alleged or existing claims for overpayment of franchise fees attributable to sales tax and/or underpayment of franchise fees as delineated in the Commission's audit of the gross revenues of North Central. North Central shall have agreed and City hereby agrees to negotiate mutually acceptable language to amend the Franchise definition to "Gross Revenues" to more adequately reflect the current practices of North Central in the calculation and payment of Franchise Fees. c. The City hereby waives the Franchise requirement that the emergency override system also override audio on the FM service provided to subscribers. d. The City hereby waives any Franchise requirement that short wave signals be carried on the FM band. e. The City hereby agrees to hold in abeyance the issue of the provision of status monitoring equipment by North Central, and agrees not to enforce the Franchise requirement for the remaining term of the Franchise, with the understanding • be a subject for negotiation upon any request for renewal of the Franchise. f. North Central shall have agreed to amend the existing Franchise to conform to this Resolution and the terms of this sale and transfer of control. RESOLUTION 4263 PAGE FIVE OF EIGHT g. To the extent required as a result of the sale of stock and transfer of control, North Central and City agree to the replacement of any and all letters of credit, bonds, insurance certificates, or other forms of security provided to the City pursuant to the terms of the Franchise. h. North Central shall have agreed to conduct "proof of performance tests" as required by the FCC, with 50% of the test sites selected by Commission on the scheduled day of the tests, and any sweeping and balancing of the system required as a result of the random end-of-line performance tests. In addition, North Central shall have agreed to conduct an annual sweep and balance of the trunk cable system, and a bi- annual (every other year) sweep and balance of the distribution system. i. North Central shall have agreed to contribute to the Commission two (2) Di-tech frames each with a capacity of forty (40) inputs by fifteen (15) outputs for the purpose of enhancing the North Suburban Access Corporation's responsibility for institutional and subscriber network switching. North Central shall purchase for the Shoreview headend a new Di-tech switcher with thirty-two (32) inputs and sixteen (16) outputs for institutional and subscriber network switching. In the event the Shoreview headend should no longer be utilized by North Central, this switcher shall at the expense of North Central be moved to and utilized for the same purpose at the Commission's master control operated by the access corporation. The access corporation agrees to assume responsibility for switching on the institutional network. RESOLUTION NO. 4263 PAGE SIX OF EIGHT j . North Central shall have agreed to contribute to the Commission a new Di-tech Pace 3000 controller including two additional controllers for sites currently identified as sites two and three. k. North Central shall have agreed to remove the hard-wiring which was the system for the purpose of accommodating the then existing needs of the school districts. 1. North Central shall have agreed to purchase ten (10) RF demodulators and three (3) frequency agile demodulators for utilization on the institutional network in the North Suburban system. m. North Central shall have agreed to reimburse Commission and its Member Cities for all expenses incurred in relation to the interim transaction and final Transfer of Ownership, including an agreement to reimburse Cities and Commission for any expenses associated with subsequent ordinance amendments required by the Transfer of Ownership but not incurred until after closing. n. North Central shall pay to Commission $650, 000.00 pursuant to the Resolution Transferring Community Programming. o. Failure to comply with above conditions "b. , f. , g. , h. , i. , j . , k. , 1. , m. , and n. , " shall render City's Resolution of Approval null and void. p. Failure to comply with condition "a. , " above, or any agreements required by this Resolution shall result in penalties and/or sanctions provided for in the Franchise. RESOLUTION NO. 4263 PAGE SEVEN OF EIGHT The above resolution was moved by Council Member and duly seconded by Council Member The following Council Members voted in the affirmative: The following Council Members voted in the negative: Passed and adopted this day of , 1992. ATTEST: Mayor City Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 4263 PAGE EIGHT OF EIGHT The undersigned, the of the City of , Minnesota does hereby certify that the attached hereto is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. , which Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council on the 992 and is in full force and effect on the date hereof. Name Title: I BERNICK AND LIFSON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 1200 THE COLONNADE 5500 WAYZATA BOULEVARD NEAL J.SHAPIRO MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55416 'Also ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN SAUL A.BERNICK• .ALSO ADMITTED IN NEBRASKA D.CREIGHTON HTON 'ALSO CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT THOMAS (612) 546-1200 OREAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST JERRY S D.CREI• AND CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST SCOTT A.LIFSON FACSIMILE 1612) 546-1003 CERTIFIED BY PAUL J.QUASI MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION S.TODD RAPP•• THERESA M.KOWALSKI OF COUNSEL JAMES S.FLEMING' ARTHUR J.GLASSMAN PARALEGAL KATHRYN G.MASTERMAN MEMORANDUM TO: Directors, North Suburban Cable Communications Commission FROM: Thomas D. Creighton 0 .57Lt:1 DATE: July 1992 / RE: Request for Approval of Transfer of control of North Central Cable Communication Corporation Please find below a summary and analysis of the proposed transaction regarding a request from North Central Cable Comm- unications Corporation (hereinafter "North Central") to the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission and its member Cities (hereinafter "Commission") to approve the transfer of control of North Central from the current shareholders to Meredith/New Heritage Strategic Partners, L.P. (hereinafter "Meredith") . Please note that the word "Commission" is used throughout this document to represent both the cable commission and the member cities. It is expressly understood that the Commission is serving only in an advisory—capacity--to the member cities, and that the member cities are the franchise holders and the final authorities in any determination regarding approval of the proposed transfer of control. North Central is the parent company of the current franchise holder, Group W of The North Suburbs, Inc. , doing business as Cable TV North Central. The purpose of this report is to provide the Commission with an understanding of the transaction and the standard for reviewing whether to approve it. BERNICK AND LIFSON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION I. INTRODUCTION At the time of awarding the original franchise and in subsequent transfers of the cable communications franchise, the Commission considered and approved the technical ability, financial capability, legal qualifications and character of previous owners of the cable system, as well as other appropriate factors. The same qualifications are to be considered and reviewed as part of the transfer of control request as they relate to Meredith. The sources of information used in examining these factors include the Response to the Municipal Request for Information supplied to the Commission and its consultants and other supplemental written information provided by Meredith and North Central. II. STANDARD OF REVIEW The Commission's task in this process is to review the information provided regarding the transaction and to approve or deny the transfer of control of North Central. The cable communications franchises and State statute both expressly reserve the right of the City to approve or disapprove such a transfer of control. The standard of review is that the City's consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. For the purpose of determining whether the City will consent to the change in control of North Central, the Commission has made inquiry into the legal, technical and financial qualifications of Meredith, as well as other appropriate factors. In analyzing the transaction, the Commission must consider whether the transaction meets all of the criteria originally consid_Pred—in—granting the o-r-iginal—r-a-nchi-se and subsequently approving the previous transfer of ownership of North Central. It should be noted, however, that this analysis is not a comparison between the current owners and the proposed new owners. Rather, this analysis is an application of factors to determine whether the proposed new owners of North Central satisfy the standards outlined above to the reasonable satisfaction of the Commission. The Commission should focus on the following factors in determining whether to approve or deny the transfer of control to Meredith. 2 BERNICK AND LIFSON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 1. Legal and character qualifications of all entities involved in the proposed transfer; 2 . Technical ability of Meredith; 3 . Technical performance of the existing system; 4. Financial stability of the proposed transaction and the proposed owners: and 5. Other appropriate factors. III. ANALYSIS Each of the factors will be analyzed separately although they are not exclusive. For the purpose of the analysis of the transaction the Commission retained the services of outside consulting firms. The technical analysis was conducted on behalf of the Commission by Communications Support Corporation (hereinafter "CSC") , of Encino, California. The financial analysis was conducted on behalf of the Commission by Public Knowledge of Portland, Oregon. The legal analysis, general coordination of the consultants' analyses, negotiations with the present and prospective owners, and drafting of required documents were conducted by Bernick and Lifson, legal counsel to the Commission. The technical report and its addendum and the financial report are attached hereto and made a part hereof. The entire process of analysis of the proposed transfer of control was coordinated by Coralie Wilson, Cable Administrator for the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission. IV. •F;GAL QUALIFICATIONS The legal qualifications standard relates primarily to an analysis of whether Meredith and those entities with an ownership interest in Meredith are duly organized and authorized to own the stock and assets of North Central. Certain entities, such as certain television broadcasting and certain telephone companies are prohibited by Federal law from owning, operating or controlling certain cable television systems. Although these restrictions are primarily a concern of the owners of North Central and its lenders, we have reviewed the Federal cross-ownership prohibitions and have determined them not to effect this transaction. 3 BERNICK AND LIFSON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION The transaction under consideration by the Commission was proposed in two steps. The first step has been referred to as the interim transaction and was accomplished on or before December 31, 1991 without objection from the Commission. However, the Commission reserved the right to analyze the interim step as part of the entire transaction, and, should the entire transaction not be approved, the interim transaction would be undone and considered null and void. At the beginning of the transaction, the outstanding capital stock of North Central was held by Hauser Cable of Minnesota, Inc. , (49.5%) , Hauser Cable Communications, Inc. , ( .5%) , and Continental Cable of Minnesota, Inc. , (50%) . The interim step resulted in Continental transferring a 33 1/3% interest in North Central to a holding company. The holding company had no purpose other than its holding the one third interest in North Central, and it had no assets, other than its ownership in North Central. The holding company created two classes of stock, voting and non-voting. Only the non-voting stock was transferred to Meredith. Continental retained the voting stock and a 19 1/2% interest in the stock of North Central. As a result of the retention by Continental of the voting stock, no change in the management or control of North Central occurred as of the Interim step. The final step in the transaction contemplates the sale to Meredith of the stock currently held by the Hauser corporations (50% of North Central 's stock) . Meredith has already acquired an indirect 33 1/3% financial interest in North Central 's stock, and at closing will acquire the remaining voting stock of the holding company currently retained by Continental. This will give Meredith 8--1-/3-%o-f—North Centra]-'-s-stock. Continental will contribute to Meredith its remaining 16 2/3% of North Central 's stork so that Meredith will own 100% of the stock of North Central. Subsequent to closing, Meredith will be owned by Meredith/New Heritage Partnership (62 . 1%) and Continental Cablevision of Minnesota, Inc. (37.9%) . Continental Cablevision of Minnesota, Inc. , is wholly owned by Continental Cablevision, Inc. Meredith/New Heritage Partnership is owned by Meredith Cable, Inc. (88%) and New Heritage Associates (12%) . The prospective owners have represented that Meredith is licensed to do business in Minnesota. 4 BERNICK AND LIFSON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION The character qualifications of Meredith, as well as its owners are satisfactory. Meredith has provided information showing that neither it nor any principal or parent has ever been convicted in a criminal proceeding of any crimes against character. Meredith has provided the Commission with the following corporate and partnership documents: North Central Cable Communications Corporation Stock Purchase Agreement North Central Cable Communications Corporation Interim Stock Purchase Agreement Meredith/New Heritage Strategic Partners L.P. Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership Meredith/New Heritage Partnership Agreement New Heritage Associates Partnership Agreement Meredith Corporation 1991 Annual Report Secretary's Certificates of Ingersoll Group, Inc. , Meredith Corporation and Meredith Cable, Inc. certifying their respective Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws Based upon review of the information provided, it would appear that the Commission could not withhold approval of the transfer based upon the legal or character qualifications of Meredith, its principals, or the entities which retain ownership interest in Meredith. V. TECHNICAL ABILITY The technical ability factor relates to the technical expertise and experience of Meredith in operating and maintaining a cable system. This analysis focuses on the current and former experience of the proposed Transferee. Since Meredith is a newly created entity, it is necessary to review the cable management performance and experience of the individuals who will manage Meredith. The Commission has been provided with information regarding the experience of the principles of the proposed new owners. The entire management team were previously involved in the 5 BERNICK AND LIFSON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION management of Heritage Communications of Des Moines, Iowa. Heritage was a highly regarded multiple system operator. Developed primarily through acquisitions of existing cable systems, Heritage developed a reputation in the industry for quality technical performance and high levels of customer service and satisfaction. Although such experience does not necessarily translate into any guarantee of performance by the new owners, the representations of the principles of the proposed new owners before the various city • - - • . S - . 6 provided by the proposed new owners indicate a probability that the cities can expect a quality cable operation with experienced individuals making the ultimate management decisions. Further, the present local management has been retained for the time being, and for the most part the cities have experienced quality local management and technical supervision of the existing cable systems over the past years of Hauser ownership. The prospective owners have represented that the quality of past management operations will be maintained. As stated earlier, the technical analysis of the system was conducted by CSC. The Commission determined early on that it would be necessary not only to review the technical ability of the proposed owners, but that an analysis of the technical performance of the existing system to determine Franchise compliance would be necessary prior to any recommendation regarding the proposed transfer. The age of the system, alone, warranted such an analysis of the existing system. CSC conducted an extensive analysis of the cable system. A review was made of the technical operating conditions of the system at the company's headends and microwave and fiber optic hubsites, thirty (30) subscriber network test points, fourteen (14) inti-tutional network test points, and multiple points located throughout the communities for evaluating the physical condition of the company's plant. The actual physical technical analysis was supplemented by numerous personal contacts from CSC to the company and the Commission. An initial report was issued by CSC and Jonathan Kramer, principal of CSC, participated in an oral presentation of the technical analysis. The oral presentation was open to all policy makers and the general public and was taped for future review. The initial report of CSC is attached hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof. The company responded in writing regarding 6 BERNICK AND LIFSON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION various physical discrepancies which could be immediately resolved. Additionally, CSC supplemented its initial report with an addendum which is attached hereto as Exhibit C and made a part hereof. CSC determined that the electrical performance of the system should be graded "B" , "Above average achievement; Exceeds most cable operators. " The consultant later acknowledged that the "B" grade was one of the highest he had given a cable system of the age Given the age of the plant and the extreme temperature swings the plant is subjected to, CSC graded the physical plant of the system also a "B. " A majority of the technical report went on to identify specific concerns or issues with which the City would have to deal. Attention is directed to the actual report appended hereto for further reference regarding specifics, but suffice it to say for the purpose of this report, that each technical discrepancy has been reviewed by staff and the Commission. Each discrepancy has been either resolved, recommended to be waived, or negotiated as part of the approval process. Based upon a review of the information provided by the proposed owners, the technical analysis, North Central 's written response to the technical analysis, and the above discussion, it would appear that the Commission could not reasonably withhold approval of the transfer based upon the technical ability of Meredith, its principles, and the remaining management team of Cable TV North Central. VI. FINANCIAL STABILITY The financial stability factor relates to whether MPrpdith has the financial resources available or committed to not only acquire the system, but also whether its financial plan as presented is reasonable and economically viable. The Commission has engaged Jay Smith of Public Knowledge to conduct the financial analysis of the transaction. That report is attached hereto as Exhibit C and made a part hereof. Reference should be made directly to the report for a complete understanding of the financial analysis. Mr. Smith also appeared at a public hearing to orally present his report. That presentation was also taped for future review. 7 BERNICK AND LIFSON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION The objectives of the financial analysis as explained in the attached report were to assess: The financial strength of the proposed buyer The reasonableness of the proposed financing arrangement The reasonableness of financial projections for the system The ability of the buyer to meet debt obligations Other financial issues that may arise in the course of the analysis Public Knowledge arrived at the following conclusions regarding the financial analysis: The proposed purchase price of about $2, 136 per subscriber is consistent with the market range in the past few years. The initial debt-to-equity ratio of 1. 12 under the proposed ownership is less leveraged than the industry average of 3 .0. Because Meredith/New Heritage Strategic Partners L.P. (the buyer) is recently formed, audited financial statements are not available for the partnership, and therefore its historical financial condition cannot be assessed. The North Central system currently performs slightly below norms for certain selected financial indicators, and slightly better for others. The buyer's financial projections for the North Central system —appear—opt imistic;but—achievable. Sensitivity analysis of the buyer's projections suggests that the buyer can service the acquisition debt even if certain conditions materialize somewhat less favorably than assumed. However, there are unlikely to be sufficient funds for any significant plant rebuild or upgrade before the year 2000 unless there is a significant amount of additional borrowing or an equity infusion; debt service and normal capital expenditures will consume most of the operating cash flow. ** 8 BERNICK AND LIFSON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Although the rate-setting, marketing, and service approaches could be different under the proposed new management, the proposed financial transaction itself should not directly have a significant impact on these factors. **Later consultation with Mr. Smith and presentations at public hearings by Meredith indicated that the company would have available the option to infuse more capital or increase debt to make the capital improvements required by the various systems. Meredith stated in the public hearings that it would comply with all required technical upgrades of the system, and that its principals had a reputation in the industry for quality technical operations and experimentations into new technologies, when such advances warranted implementation. Based upon the information provided by the prospective owners, the analysis of Public Knowledge, and the above discussion, it would appear that the Commission could not reasonably withhold approval of the proposed transaction as a result of the financial factor of the analysis. VII. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS In the process of the analysis of the proposed transaction, numerous issues arose regarding system performance and Franchise requirements. Attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof is the recommended Resolution for Approving of the Transfer of Ownership of North Central Communications Corporation. In this Resolution is found the recommended resolution of issues identified at this time. Any approval of the proposed transaction should be contingent upon North Central 's compliance with the terms and conditions of this Resolution, should it be adopted by the City. Reference shouldbe made to this Resolution and the proposed conditio, • . • _ _ _ _ _ • _ approval of this proposed transaction. Although not attached to this document, the record of the proposed transaction includes the company's response to the Municipal Request for Information Regarding Request for Approval of Transfer of Ownership, supplemental written responses to subsequent questions of Commission and its consultants, and any additional written responses of the current and prospective owners of the cable system. The owners of the system will be considered to be bound by all such representations as well as continuing to be bound 9 BERNICK AND LIFSON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION by the underlying Franchise of the City. All public hearings and legal notice requirements required by the Franchise and State statute have been complied with by Commission. VIII. CONCLUSION Based upon the entire record of this analysis it is our conclusion that there does not appear to be a reasonable basis for the City to deny the proposed transfer of control of North Central, provided all conditions of Exhibit A, attached hereto, are complied with by North Central. 10 Agenda Section: 9.n cams REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-335C Report Date: Council Action: 7-93-9 1111, STAFF REPORT E Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE July 27, 1992 ❑ Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda MI Council Business Item Description: Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m. , August 24, 1992 to Consider an Ordinance Approving an Electrical Energy Franchise Agreement with Northern States Power (NSP) Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. —Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SI LMMARI% This staff report will address the Council Business Item 9.D. and also Council Business Item 9.E. Last fall, the City Council held a public hearing and considered an ordinance which would establish a franchise fee of up to 4% on Northern States Power's gross operating gas and electric revenues as permitted under the Franchise Agreement with NSP. The provisions of the franchise allowed for payment of franchise fees no later than April 1 of each year, with the fees based upon the gross operating revenues for the preceding calendar year. The result of this provision enabled NSP to collect and retain the fee for a full year (based on a late Fall passage) , before paying the City. This provision was a major issue of concern of residents who attended the public hearing and members of the Council. The ordinance failed due to a 3-2 vote. Since that time, Council has directed staff to pursue a new franchise agreement with NSP which would provide for monthly payments of the franchise fees. All new franchise fee agreements for gas and electrical energy have been negotiated and provide for the desired payment schedule. As per City Charter, separate public hearings must be held on both new franchise agreements and the implementation of franchise fees on gas and electric operating revenues as • • ided by the agreements. a Orduno, C !Administrator a' JtECOMMENDATION; Motion to set a public hearing for 7: 05 p.m. on August 24, 1992 to consider an ordinance approving an electrical energy franchise agreement with Northern States Power (NSP) . STAFF REPORT JULY 27, 1992 PAGE TWO Staff is recommending that all three public hearings be held August 24, 1992, in order to provide sufficient time for notice to the public and to finalize the details of the proposed franchise agreements. Each public hearing date and time must be set by separate motion. Agenda Section: 9 .E. ©mos REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-336C STAFF REPORT Report Date: 7-23-92 Ill �� � Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE JULY 27, 1992 ❑ Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda 21 Council Business Item Description: Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing for 7 :10 p.m. , August 24 , 1992 to consider an ordinance approving a gas energy franchise Agrpememnf with NSP Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. SUMMARY: Refer to previous Staff Report No. 92-335C (Agenda Item No. 9.D. ) . mantha Orduno, Cc_______---------- -a-,--yt-e2-, (i y Administrator RECOMMENDATION; Motion to set a public hearing for 7: 10 p.m. on August 24, 1992 to consider an ordinance approving a gas energy franchise agreement with Northern States Power. Agenda Section: 9 .F. 00 MMDs REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-337C t Date: 11111, STAFF REPORT cow 1 Action: 7-23-92 ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE JULY 27 , 1992 ❑ Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda ® Council Business Item Description: Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing for 7 :15 p.m. , August 24 , 1992 to Consider an Ordinance Implementing a Franchise Fee on Gas and P..1ertrir Utilities Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summaiy (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) $UMMARY: Over the past several years cities have experienced declining revenues due to such factors as State cuts to Local Government Aid, reductions in residential and commercial/industrial property tax rates, reduced investment earnings, less construction and development resulting in declines in permit fees and now a recession that is further exacerbating an already dangerous situation. Declining revenues, coupled with costly legislative mandates every year, changes in pay equity regulations, increased equipment and operating costs have put cities in a Catch 22 -- demands from residents to do more and more with less and less. The consequences of this dilemma is the move toward user fees, franchise fees and other non-property tax revenues. A franchise fee is an example of a user fee based revenue program imposed on a company conducting business for profit within the City limits. The City currently has a franchise agreement with North Central Cable (soon to be Meredith) . The Cable Company conducts business in the City and for that privilege, the company pays the City a franchise fee of 5% to be used only for the City's municipal cable operations. A franchise fee on gas and electri - 1 revenues would not be restrictcd and could be used to buy down property taxes. As per City Charter, a public hearing is required prior to the consideration of an or. .nce establishing franchise fees. Samanth- Orduno, City Adm. istrator RECOMMENDATION; Motion to set a public hearing for 7: 15 p.m. on August 24, 1992 to consider an ordinance implementing a franchise fee on gas and electric utilities Agenda Section: 9.G 11 170SREQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-338CSTAFF REPORT Report Date: 7-7 3-92 � Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE Ti 1 y 97, 19 Q 0 Public Hearings 0 Consent Agenda C Council Business Item Description: Designating the St. Paul Pioneer Press as the City's Second Legal Paper Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY: A recent incident involving the publication of public hearing notices in the New Brighton Bulletin has prompted this request from staff to designate the St. Paul Pioneer Press as the City's second legal newspaper. On July 9, 1992, four public hearing notices were faxed to the Bulletin for publication in the July 15, 1992 issue. When staff reviewed the paper to cut the notice from the paper for our files, it was learned that the notices had not been published. Upon examining the FAX verifications and after talking to Mac Mead at the Bulletin, we were all unable to come up with a logical explanation as to why the notices were not received and subsequently published. The FAX verification indicated the notice was sent and received. In order to prevent non-publications of required hearing notices in the future, it is staff's recommendation that a daily paper, the St. Paul Pioneer Press, be named as a second legal newspaper. Sa =ntha +' duno, Cit Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Motion to waive the reading and adopt Resolution No. 4266 Designating the St. Paul Pioneer Press as the City's Second Legal Newspaper RESOLUTION NO. 4266 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPOINTING A SECOND OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER WHEREAS, on January 13, 1992, the City Council appointed the New Brighton Bulletin as the City's legal newspaper; and WHEREAS, there are frequent times during the year which require more timely publication of public notices than is possible with the Bulletin's weekly publication schedule. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby appoints the St. Paul Pioneer Press as its second legal newspaper. Adopted this 27 day of July, 1992. ATTEST: MAYOR (SEAL) CLERK-ADMINISTRATOR AGENDA PAGE SIX JULY 27, 1992 F. Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing for 7: 15 p.m. , August 24, 1992 to Consider an Ordinance Implementing a Franchise Fee on Gas and Electric Utilities, Staff Report No. 92-337C COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: G. Consideration of Designating the St. Paul Pioneer Press as the City's Second Legal Paper, Staff Report No. 92-338C COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 10. REPORTS: 1. Report of Councilmembers: Rickaby, Quick, Blanchard, Wuori 2 . Report of Mayor Linke 3 . Report of Administrator 4. Report of Staff 5. Report of Attorney 11. ADJOURNMENT: NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION: AUGUST 3, 1992 NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 10, 1992 ITEM 5.B RESOLUTION NO. 4256 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION COMMENDING BRYAN RIFE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A LANDSCAPE BORDER AROUND THE HORSESHOE COURTS AT SILVER VIEW PARK WHEREAS, Bryan Rife presented a proposal for the construction of a timber landscape border around the horseshoe courts at Silver View Park as a project for an Eagle Scout award; and WHEREAS, Bryan took measurements and drew a diagram of the project dimensions and estimated the amount of materials needed along with a list of prices from various suppliers; and WHEREAS, Bryan met with staff to understand the specification required in the construction of the project; and WHEREAS, Bryan organized and supervised volunteer workers for the completion of this project, following all the specifications and completing the project with flying colors; and WHEREAS, this completion of this project provides for a boundary around the horseshoe facility at Silver View Park, offering a game boundary, safety barrier and erosion control. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View wishes to thank Bryan Rife for his work in the construction of a timber landscape border for the horseshoe courts at Silver View Park. Adopted this 27th day of July, 1992. (SEAL) Jerome W. Linke, Mayor ATTEST: Samantha Orduno, Clerk-Administrator ITEM 5.A RESOLUTION NO. 4257 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION COMMENDING PETER SZUREK FOR RE-FINISHING WOODCREST PARK BUILDING WHEREAS, Peter Szurek presented a proposal for the exterior maintenance of Woodcrest Park building as a project for an Eagle Scout award; and WHEREAS, Peter inspected the repair needs of the exterior of Woodcrest Park building and provided a list of work to be done, along with a list of work supplies including paint, sand paper, caulking, etc.; and WHEREAS, Peter organized volunteer workers and supervised the work of stripping the building of it's old paint, making repairs as necessary and finally repainting the entire building; and WHEREAS, even though Peter was on a short time constraint because of scheduled activities at the park, he was successful in completing the project within those tight time restraints while passing final inspection with flying colors. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View wishes to thank Peter Szurek for his work in the repair and repainting of Woodcrest Park building. Adopted this 27th day of July, 1992 (SEAL) Jerome-W.-L-Linke, Mayor ATTEST: Samantha Orduno, Clerk-Administrator MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION & FORESTRY DATE: JULY 20, 1992 SUBJECT: BALLFIELD FOR 12-13 YEAR OLDS, TRAVELLING MVAA Councilmember Quick requested information regarding the cost or loss of recreation activity fund revenue if one adult softball field was dedicated to the 12-13 year old travelling MVAA team. The cost is $1, 600. 00 for one field one evening per week. Portions of this revenue typically goes towards the cost of field maintenance materials such as the infield surface ag-lime, chalk, bases, homeplates and pitching rubbers. Also, portions of this revenue contributes to the salary of the 1/2 time seasonal groomskeeper that is directed to groom adult fields on a game basis and youth fields twice a week. Finally, portions of this revenue contributes to the program supervisor' s salary, which all comes from Recreation Activity Fund. The Parks, Recreation & Forestry Department counts on the revenue of Adult Softball to cover the greater portions of the Program Supervisor' s salary, who dedicates the majority of his time to youth and adult sports activities. Because we have a well established adult softball program, we are able to count of a stable revenue from the Recreation Activity Fund. To disrupt the Adult Softball program will mean a reduction in revenue plus the downgrading of the program as good established reputation. The Adult Softball program only uses three fields to accommodate approximately 80 teams, with a revenue of over $32 , 000. 00 and projected profit of approximately $16, 000. 00 which is budgeted to pay for the salary of the Program Supervisor who administers both youth and adult athletics. The decrease in adult softball programming will result in loss of revenues. The 12-13 year old travelling MVAA baseball team is a combined team of players who are residents of both New Brighton and Mounds View. They have been holding practices and games at Sunny Square Park (which is a central location for both cities since the park is located on the border of the two cities, just off of County Road H and Silver Lake Road) . Also, they have held practices and games at Hanson Park which is located in New Brighton. Evidently the complaint is that there is not a field available in the City of Mounds View which accommodates this age team. The requirements for this age division is 75' bases, larger infield and approximately 250 ' outfield dimensions. Lambert Park athletic field offers the criteria required for this team. The infield is large enough for 75 ' bases, the outfield offers sufficient distances, and the outfield grass is healthy and thick. Break-away fencing could be easily installed. This field offers the same qualities as both the Hanson Park field and the Sunny Square Park field currently used by this team. This option would provide this team with a Mounds View field. This option is the best of several that were considered, would not cost the City monies except for the installation of break- away fencing, which would be an in-house installation - fencing materials already inhand. This option would not cost the MVAA and would not decrease the adult softball revenues due to a cut in the league size. In conclusion, I wish to suggest that the City of Mounds View designate Lambert Park ballfield as the field to house the 12-13 year old MVAA travelling team with the installation of break-away fencing. This option is the best choice for the City as a whole and provides the 12-13 year old team with a Mounds View field that has the same qualities as the Sunny Square and Hanson Park fields that they currently use. _ , ppi 1 Li1. 01011,---( / . k . r --- .,1:-.),1-3,.1.,; p.t-,-.1_1. rIt: t _ .... _ ...._ Ac715, .. ., Li ;so' I II , 029e/I ' 1 , — --"" ' .--;='-'•------ --- ---- •,....._ ...-- –......... ____ / 1 ,--------..... i ... ,. I . . / I I c • ; i 1 . i \ / / . C i ' \ I C . 0 0 // i r.c. I / . . / _ I 1 i / i I Ii • 1 , . I . . . , 1—,-- — •"""'l Cit-01---- . . ., _ , --• . . t I • . ib- . . . . 11 l' ... . . ., 1 .. . . . ..,. - —. . • . i i -; , 1 -I• ( i- \ . r . ••••• • .,Ir' •.. • jit4t7_,LF_'? ____. ZESALLPrzt II ill'0 k•v it _11 n ..__. _ R.escztiegi3:.__CtLer--5ize.LacAg.t55.d_r_y u.1111;z2-- -e-q-ue,,T---- 7— . i. A • ... 70221 ketAllo li___pilly-&__To_io eicxy,1 4 1- Tl I pg 1771 121.:-,7 1 . . Dear S(r) / cd---'7o C a _ ..:_j_kkt cifiw arid b r 1-- `v_ iZici.___cm..e.___c_c_p 1 a e e it.'ed ce_,SagfaiLe4.5V • (A./ _a_c_-F___ _r_o_h_Lew..5._TA,. de_.v.elot-- 0177-rk-s.______ 0. Q.. _,Luli 41 ra.if 7"las siz-e, , Is e 124.11--Li?g.;.t..q L.41_4.u et,-":27.art--_NAA 1/ b e. ta_c_czla.1 _21 _a_22.4:1 i2ceijii-i_ l/y • : V ih 1 c• ...1.5_74_LickL2 4 t3i,-__ZLeza _01-_s___r_Q 4 Litce:5_4_4417/..tAl . _J.....--4, .r. :.----cliycze_ct i5 g i'a_ssi a r e a/ , tAl - .----q.- 2--Q.va-11:e .3 i_:,_1...5 - _ (13,02829,70 - 1 .14-4 ..) yo_vi,s 77-22.1fi et .._. 4 setettr--71 Go 4.011_0 J sifiyiepLikks.oit_ n • az 4 as • - 4. d• 44 %IP %MOO' ...S.LJ • I ' _ ' . July 14, 1992 • • Paul Harrington: A resident of Mounds View, Gary Olson, 5209 O'Connell Drive, called today to voice his opinion for the record regarding the Conditional Use Permit for 5200 Jeffrey Drive. Mr.. Olson stated that he and his wife are opposed to allowing a kennel at this address. Mr. Olson stated that with five out buildings on the property he would not want to see anything'more added and thinks the dog situation would then get out of hand. Mr. Olson works evenings, but he would like this to be entered as part of the hearing, if possible. Michele • • Agenda Section: 7, 7:0 5 p-m, ouNos REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 97-3250 Report Date: Council Action: 7-23-92 ni o��� STAFF REPORT ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE July 27, 1992 Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Resolution No. 4260 Approving a Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Establishment of a Residential Dog Kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive, Planning Case Nn_pg-91 Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement she is a- necessary.) SUMMARY: Mary Niezgocki has made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the establishment of a residential dog kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive. Chapter 40. 10 Subdivision D(4) of the Mounds View Municipal Code allows for dog/cat kennels of no more than four(4) animals in residential zone districts with a conditional use permit; The applicants property is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The application indicates that four(4) dogs will be kept on the site. The Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed this request and recommended approval in Resolution No. 340-92 . I have attached a copy of this resolution and all materials received as part of the application. Also included for your information are copies of police reports filed on the property relating to dogs kept on-site. Please find attached a copy of City Council Resolution No. 4260 for your review and consideration. If you have any questions, please call. / "�-// Paul Harrington, u ty Planner RECOMMENDATION: Adopt City Council Resolution No. 4260 approving a Conditional Use Permit to allow the establishment of a residential dog kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive, Planning Case No. 338-91 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION (�I Date 1 - APPLICANT: Name '`'\RY Phone ? '(,,- Address (y -DR. Interest in Property (Check Appropriate Blank) : X Owner of Record Lessee, Operator, Manayer Contractor for Deed Owner Ayreement to Purchase - Other (Expl ain) Documentary evidence of applicant' s interest in the property may be required before final City action on this request. PROPERTY : Address/General Location 7)-,.. (o1 T 0 CAK �rt Leyal Owner: Name/Address -.H-tARR•{ (V141,2,c 1\ti brt Present Use (Check Appropriate Blank) : Undevel oped/Vacant Apartment >l Sinyl e Family Dwell i ny Business Esabl ishment Dupl ex Dwell my Industrial Establ ishment - Multiple Dwell my (3-6 units) - Other (expl ain) Property Classification: Abstract Torrens REQUEST: (Expl ain) z, i i vv� L)5 .--PE� - � N k3 F .4/ 7Thr c\c I hereby decl are that the above statements are true. siyn�tur=-'Y FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: TOTAL BASE *(Base Fees are Non-Refundable) DEPOSIT FEES Subdivision , Major $250 ($150) TOTAL FEES PAID 4./do. 00 Subdivision , Minor $100 ($75) Date Paid a -9 d Rezoniny $100 ($50) Receipt Number 37 So Conditional Use $100 ($50) /00 - o Variance $75 ($50) Code Appeal $100 ($50) Par and Des ' ation Alteration Permit $150 ($50) _ Dat- Pa ' , /A: • ":1.1/A Pl an Review $100 ($50) Receipt Num.-r Other ($50) PLANNING SIGN $ 50 Addt'l Fees Paid Date Paid Receipt Number 7r-9— LAW ENFORCEMENT INITIAL COMPLAINT REPORT MESS KEY CONTROL NUMBER MCA/ CONT. AGENCY NCIC IOENT. ICAC) MOUNDS VIEW E t C l / t G� 3tt� , 1 `'1 / M I N 1 1 t 1 / POLICE L NSF; DATEE REPORTED IRPOI I TIME RPO ITRPI LOCATION GRID NBA (LGN) 1 � � v L [ 2 1 / t,/ 1/ jI' ' / �1 / 1 / Py CE COMMITTED (PLC) iTI,�1 �1 1 1 1 141 le 1 4' i j✓trG. I e/1 I 1 J O L NBR HRO SQUAD OR BADGE I ISBN) TIME7 ASIC. ITASI 1t TIME ARR. TAR)) TIME) CCLR. (TCL) HRO Code' P / / t t1 t/' 1_cr/ vt�i� / 1 E�t6�/ i �'/ / ( +-" t "r't���I / P Phone T R •Radio L NOR ISN UOC UCS UCS CODES A •Alarm Pending J -CLRO/Arrest.Jr. R •Ref.0th. Aeon. 1 • In Person / I / / [SiC •Exe./CLRO A •CLRO/Arrest Adult- S •AWL/AdvisedU •Unfounded Jur. 0 .00ANTL V •Visual e G- j T -Other M -mad Complainant: / t////-5 yd4 •( 1 Ce�""tr)f� Phone # T olnyi_ Address: ..,_` - .: ,/ • ,r� ;o1n�)lalnt: ,Ipla It T4 t ) ''4/� ..ter Incident De ri tign: ,/ L1 /Z �� 4� ,� -/ / , 1 Lac` -.111,- ,1 ' 1 / / r7� _/, N � // � i ` L %�f1 �. G...e��e ; 11 -i4; ea'•-C c, es.s.( . , . r;;5-.. , :,,./ T, Addt'1 Repts/1 - _ 1,—& Enter CJfl v7, — --P--. .* -=`.:-.INCIDEN AS REPORTECf - '3'. ' '.. -• : . :DATE : • CITY : CODE ....„..m.r...----,.... ..-.- _ , ,s.,„. . „ , .. . . ,:-. .- ..... I,,-,, ..,,,,..::!.,„i ...., i • •4.:.,',4 w.:: -4;4,14 : :11:• .:-.::-!",: ,-- 1•! ':; (91; miASE. -: I. 10/41_ ,....'7,'...-- 0 „., '... ... 1-, ilt.?!... ,'!;,!• .2 .-,..;,':- . , 1 IF GRID . - •: •-,-••.!. .-=---:-=.-' = *:-K" --•.Lit. iCerfiliC IDENT:,•, -,.•;?,!-11. .••-2. ., - •.: SQUAD '. , . BADGE -. c aj n_.C.C5.CO- C '1;.S'. -. .- ---. . '..1, . "-..-- .7..•-• ,--„,..!--,1 A vs.,.4g ..•..;1,,:„.,;;,..2.-'•' 1::.-i,i.,„-.4 . 1., -, i i. _ .:1.*:' .'..1-i,! ''...::-,1,;., .''''!.'iletc.2 '1,;i r.i- ' ... ' --' .-t! , 5 •k. ,.Fl.!, • !..• :•.•:•. . i. \ , "-;., .7.jr . ,• -. • ) •V9HH• 1 PHONE .,. - • -.:--..A. :-..1,,,,,,NV,4-"z' .4::-4.REPORTED BY.--,jr,...-.,.. ....,,- :•- ,..'4'I 4. ,.-, • . : . ASSISTING SoUADS -..1"...1,-*4-"*.-1 ,;,-: ,,7,:--,,,,a , ,. ...1 SQUAD.: :•BADGE.. _SENT CLEAR - - • ;• '''''r*'•-•'4-4" 1`..'•' '*. . A,,W; ' •• ''• " 't • '4.'°PA''of jti' il -- - , ..: ,!: AtItlls-P rd. 0''.1 .i,:,..,k,:-,11 - ,.1,1 ')''-'•' ".; ''tf, ....VV-AVVilli. 4*•TZ64 .,i, ,.:,-' -: 6... Z-'1'Ti, J l'4 `T'g,i, • ",..• ' .1"i,•-li ri' , Az-4• '1' '' + Z, '.:,,,--(1'.,,,,...::*,.: r-,-...;:gt- J, ;)-- ..06-1%.4.11.Ul,': .- - '... : . '' :.-7:- .1 .. ,,,..„,...,•-:.: 5...4-:!-,.. ',;,:•,ADDRESS •-E...':'''''10!.... i. - Ir',F.....,24.7.1•40•-',..-1-"*:-Wft.r.'`;'7'44•::'-3i,,-t...,ftl.,...., 1.,i,f',..--., •:,'..- -,.;'.- :;-- i • . . ..... .:.,...t ... .,,.,..,:-..,.. „..„..,.,,,,v„,,,,,,,,,..,:4.r.::..-,.Ftdil,.!...4i.viTi, ',Afe.;.44,:f:4,i'-4.171; 11, ..t :'•:.14!il ''.i' '-',.'• .-.----: ' :,'.1..t • '. 1 . . . • i•`'. A4. P.;';,,T.: ...iltitliett,, tt'.-t_c:`:.'. '; ' '.-::3 ''''''.. ...... i'.:':i':,..rt„,s I .,.::::...;.: .:'; .:•:!,-::i.,,;4- . 1. - W a,K:„ .;.:: '::;'1::?".4: '' . .-.tidtiaxt,''gr , ;•--, ., ,-.,-.:::. : .:i --.p.ki',..: - , -: i ••- ..- ; - REMARKS ..-.:.,- -,-i-L.1:- .A...ttaillgeff;10V.'11:44L,::-..!,-;;,g,,,..t.IT t,q!.:14;i.,.z ;1.-,*--,::,t: ':,:-,: .0-,,,,,,:..f:j....---, ..•i - 7 , !': V. !-•-•• :'' .- ,4"-ii),..;.11,7kci4.441:;.04,g9.,. t4.''5.1%, ""14stg.:11-.,14TZ,t-,,,,..ii-fi.. -7-F.:Ai. •'-'1-:',' :"4.7 ' ; -,,:-.,. :--:-,, :!;:!,,, ..'.-;,..w1-.,..;x:;-4-i,,oirs ;4.,,p4:11,-.,=.7.0„,.,,..--,.int-;A-:::-,f. ,,,,, ':,.gsqi "..-.::"1.:N,..-!`.; ''',.• '..'.. _ - - -• -!------'---'--' ' ,''.',-''.''.":•.-':.-•'-.r,•'.•,•',•.,.-.,--.-.,..-.'"-r...:...:r:,.':-,:,f:"I'..:,.,-:.-'.-:*.:.''.!:--: .;-1,.,,V7:,-•-rt-f.:L')„.-fz,:,':;'-.tA,:-.,.:,n7-,4*j.;.-,.„4.I,,4'f.,t,1...0'0,,..1•'-1:,t,%t'..I•2,?-i..-,1i-.A-'i:.-..4-,1--,,,,-,,;-4,,'%•w-.-.'i4':.-...,1:.;-J':::_ir::f2.m*'4'LAi.tv..‘-,'4t-i.7t.:-.,::i--,,.-',,:.:-ri...ri:"-.':....''1.3i''':1-:1.,'4,'4:'&''''''*'S'l'',.4IV,3..i;-.:.-,i,"1tt41f4.I5'41.t7Nl*1A.i1-.V-:4-4:--:,:.:4,d:',",,iifIll.-.'f'-.:-12",r34,,,'r-, -:"1•I.";.i'i1',i:':-r:.,j';..;:Y,';,,. '.-.-:.:':•.::',;',i..,..!,'„--::.4i':;:4-;'t-,-,',-,,'':.,-,;'.:'1.:t'1'11:,.•-,,.':i„,i-.,-;,,;.jf;•:'..-t:i:'.-..'-,----,-,.i DSP. '.:: , . - ,:-- - :- 1 , ;. feP.',.'..:L.3 ' . •, , • -:-: ':. :T:::•:''', ;:V.:01.4.'-ci!;L'ke,z1;-,54 :'•Ir--71. .. . .e..}4:1 i.- ';--.01. '-li'11:4: ;-.•-••'''.',' '7}!:1 '.11."-•• • REC.-DIS•:AR. CLR -4','. .t--;=•;- l- -in-AN-.„.*Le.,.,i.-,e-..,.:=','-?Att,:**Ats.. 1;.3,,, :1;. 7-.'"4, I CjIt't(X- .'. . .,-:: ::;.r'. ":..H :7;',.;-::1A..:.:7:.•-ii4tgarAili.V.I.144i'WW44'1,e,iaAaii/.,i''';.:;11 t'''' •*".'" '4:'' ..' ' ' i.''''' l''' : • 11 • t, • • Y „ _TCN INCIDEN S REPORTER ,4:- ' -DATE CIT E _ T � !tea WWWW...--+_-�� GRID • GC]i { i''' ham+ is a �� s :F t yS UAD i, y:'. I�rt z BADGE • s Com__ t -'. r4t .ery .0�' p `r ,, a4�*,�,, ` '-1' }t •t. PHONEIC % 4_' , + r a °� q-_, ��..t kt / .,• .¢ a f e +ss, I S. Ass Y, r.. '� .!� " k4ka4�� �t �p�}v r -,,,,1-4.-..:7%-.xa�} � '�Q L3 i A ��'. $ENT ,, t a1 s CLR 73:57: `...7�„ . _ ," r,}t 4. 4.' ,.-xg� t ..1 0lat f ,s; o, -Y R'i r f } i,l iL'-A a 3 1 . '.'ixM�ty ��*t�N�lY"' r� g ti.44 .*n"�-.�' } � �' ` �f� '7fr �'. r,fi ADDRES �`'E}7 ft " .`$ y, ^L}I 1441 I e 4 Y 13"}1..t.••s f s p� . - •lYn a : I y ,:14{ •,:-,,....1-,} Yt ,-. w '� " '' �� • y :3•r A iGX, Y�1 � 6 a ' i � 1t1 ». EMARk a'#rrt r .n t .4 y,r,, t ;.. f-.4 ti I r ,,itu, a 'aS- 1 I 1 ry^ �.. ] i f cb,k. $„ 14 VY Gii P 11 f { 4 .?,44 t 1 kK:� 's t � s,�y.#` ,y � } 6ti+d+aC r� z ,�- v `11,-P .0G(q� �tJ-,u,....,...,. .,71,„,.. t ';~ ^� a • _± { t '+ ,l' ,' >r R r ' s iPftd t ,� f Ai, f s'�-It 93. w I. ' ..“....1,—.). r. Y dtSgY.W"•..4 t} '7`.3�Z � h k dl l�f. t C6 „.1.10c.--,,, .� I i UCS .;',4,..,c-'441,',1 .w i'+4 , �� &4.4 n.,'f. .` A k�Y' 11,, ri i Frt;n y } its •- t4 -.' T aid 3 t :1. �f�• ti a ” 3�#f'.�.tV 6 d' r t"v, ,e� i _ f `4 II--1; e•/ yi DISP. A F•,ab `5^Te i res} -� };$QI, y��i/_+v 1 � qillal arl Y i .$t REC DIS AR CLR' t� .i,,, - "`Y EK3 ..'r.-.,1•.„‘ 1; e§�4 ># , II}a �7' 4,141 1 ;'--.a} rT�``f:v .`�y.1 n. ;,' ✓i# = . ,. '•.aA � t 41.-„*.,„ �.-.r.? '.li_ aaC,+ n1,3✓'�;t Ss. x-.5-4 '.4 � i- ,>.�,. 1' .. • • CN 0:r«,*A�NCIDENTAS REf�O' 1 dk -.^ I`��; + 6k • sA '`. CITY , Y CODE GRID 5 ' >'',4:714,',14. 41 ro 81 E ' '� / I f '. . f 5 ,fk ; ; .-Is =:: -v i s-fai r* : T S C c t.,i • AO v , +: -t B DG ' CLQ(1 j'}, ¢ .bs-}t ? �,.. - h ,f Y;� ., .x 114! *,, -7"..t3 t t ,6.c , r O"L� I *' �' •t� � zi� `'°StX'h" tr :}{. +' ►� f l`j 1eI f kl 'lar '..F.'...3,.'.-:...- I PHONE .G 4 H:�• r ;i�_Y< .y , �°ts#y `:� A3SISTING 4UAD3 ':�'.:� ' W W i i 6.-1:1.. ,, .4:,101.044..,;:.-.1.4,..-0,,,t41,:, u n t s , a `AD tf if$A�C3E : �SENT:41.' # , ?CLRI . .1 i :, a rar:-, F . , ;" '1i r,Y.>ax - ,;.: I 1'�- t• I s.4",�4.,...,..,p.- ' 1,:,,,i.4.0..'" ' (� ` t , 4��eA�E+.a s., , �g p : it irdtt at� .vF t �},, ! t if: it ' 4 {i 1 $ ,ViiVN ifs i m s �r '}- s ., tla. s t dx e� 4,1....1,,,... .,..,..„.„.„...i. . ti9l tG4 ° s 1 'IR .} ;+ ..1."'',i.'44.;",-.,.: , L.Iti �' � , � $ `I l ! i �e } '- ``, '� ..', .- ,�. aL t o-; :=,t h'.5 f c r 9 w 'M+ tt 1 v C ,� 'a4 rJty,, tt s 4r t gYt gl T, .a ''- Lai 'f.;.-.1i..,414,-;.•:':';i,i ... ...LA w f� `moie � , IF,,ly + 't.. "'r.^� ,---41.44.....-41',-,.7$.. . �r 1,3.• �'t�766 ft t : e 4. • Li$ ' � _{ la F. } 3 -T }�"ake, VI { s,t I r • ,1p _ �'NHr.*,t� Y � 'fi '�' r --5 'Li!'E'}':S �# . AS44 p 1°.� ;g;�g; lgg'���N , sz _ +.r.a z -,r' E 1a"a =„:„IlAd ,, 1 .,4-��'pro Ot.S ri IFiggi' .e ---=. ' DISP • k k #+r4� .,v ,;,-,y� {•f 5s ; Z, I} zy 4 k '4 ��4 ~ -Ili, $ Y s c e '4.,'-',1:1171-=;:t.., x5�,� haw'": Y' '" ;f'.� 2`j� REC DI3 ASF CO - �s � " -a,�' + >4 ,rte k� ,t ^�,K 1, ! "` • =4 ,}wF ,kS ' f- "'Y' _.;# Fr yS -iii,',, �q 't- t•rt}� _ ..:1,,I• I .. , .. '.i Y'-'4.; ..-6;t• '3' ,.i` t' t.N`'" ',� t'e ewF M 1-1 ;S ',t4 • ,:',.,4 RESOLUTION NO. 340-92 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY MARY NIEZGOCKI FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL DOG KENNEL ON HER PROPERTY AT 8261 RED OAK DRIVE PLANNING CASE NO. 338-91 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Mary Niezgocki for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the establishment of a residential dog kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Mounds View Municipal Code and recognizes that the Code allows for residential dog kennels with a Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, Chapter 40. 25 Subdivision C (1-6) outlines the criteria by which all Conditional Use Permit requests are reviewed; and WHEREAS, complaints received on the site have been remediated and no new complaints have been received in the past year. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit based upon the following: 1. The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. 2 . The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by dis- tance or screening from adjacent residentially-zonedor-used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. 3 . The structure and site have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent residential properties. 4. The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. 5. The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been provided. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Adequate facilities continue to be provided for the humane treatment of the animals. 2 . Control and restraint of the animals continue to be provided on the kennel site. 3 . After a period of one year, the Conditional Use Permit will be subject to review. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 1st day of July, 1992 . (ATTEST) Chairman (SEAL) Planner RESOLUTION NO. 4260 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REQUEST BY MARY NIEZGOCKI FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL DOG KENNEL ON HER PROPERTY AT 8261 RED OAK DRIVE PLANNING CASE NO. 338-91 WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the request of Mary Niezgocki for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the establishment of a residential dog kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Mounds View Municipal Code and recognizes that the Code allows for residential dog kennels with a Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, Chapter 40.25 Subdivision C (1-6) outlines the criteria by.which all Conditional Use Permit requests are reviewed; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval in Resolution No. 340-92 . NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the requested Conditional Use Permit contingent upon the following: 1. Adequate facilities continue to be provided for the humane treatment of the animals. 2 . Control and restraint of the animals continue to be provided on the kennel site. 3. After a period of one year, the Conditional Use Permit .- O1. . - . - • - . Adopted this 27th day of July, 1992 . (ATTEST) Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator "' Agenda Section: 7, 7: 10 p.m. owns REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-3�6C STAFF REPORT Report Date: Council Action: 7-23-97 111 �� � ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE July 27, 1992 Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Resolution No. 4261 Denying a Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Establishmert of a Residential Dog Kennel at 5200 Jeffery Drive, Planning Case No. 339-91 Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. ExpIanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) f4UMMARY; Lonnie Madison has made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the establishment of a residential dog kennel at 5200 Jeffery Drive. Chapter 40. 10 Subdivision D(4) of the Mounds View Municipal Code allows for dog/cat kennels of no more than four(4) animals in residential zone districts with a conditional use permit; The applicants property is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The application indicates that four(4) dogs will be kept on the site. The Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed this request and recommended denial in Resolution No. 341-92 . I have attached a copy of this resolution and all materials received as part of the application. Also included for your information are copies of police reports filed on the property relating to dogs kept on-site. Please find attached a copy of City Council Resolution No. 4261 for your review and consideration. If you have any questions, please call. ' ' :::;) i,-7// _ 'Paul Harrington, CTty Planner RECOMMENDATION; Adopt City Council Resolution No. 4261 denying a Conditional Use Permit to allow the establishment of a residential dog kennel at 5200 Jeffery Drive, Planning Case No. 339-91 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION Date /,..9. 7_9 „ APPLICANT: Name g n, ee, ' k, 'LLc' ,SOn Phone 7. C. -6 (9S' Address ,. LIQ 1 e S'ery V r . Cwt f'1 els() € P4 Interest in Property (Check Appropriate Blank) : Owner of Record Lessee, Operator, Manager Contractor for Deed Owner Agreement to Purchase X Other (Explain) , Documentary evidence of applicant' s interest in the property may be required before final City action on this request. PROPERTY : Address/General Location .5 .2.00 Legal Owner: Name/Address 0-0, ),-\./ Mc( ep ,1'i ,-�--t Present Use (Check Appropriate Blank) : Undeveloped/Vacant Apartment Sinyl e Family Dwelling Business Esabl ishment Duplex Dwelling Industrial Establ ishment Multiple Dwelling (3-6 units) Other (explain) Property Classification: Abstract Torrens REQUEST: (Explain) r',,y,„„e �-( C'9 /�. .[ �pc, - � S I hereby declare that the above statements are true. �ti (signature) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY : TOTAL BASE *(Base Fees are Non-Refundable) DEPOSIT FEES Subdivision , Major $250 ($150) TOTAL FEES PAID /o o • o0 Subdivision , Minor $100 ($75) Date Paid Rezoniny $100 ($50) Receipt Number 3 -) t 33 Conditional Use $100 ($50) )oo• 0 0 Variance $75 ($50) Code Appeal $100 ($50) Park Fund Dedication Alteration Permit $150 ($50) Date Paid Plan Review $100 ($50) Receipt Number Other ($50) PLANNING SIGN $ 50 Addt'l Fees Paid Date Paid 7/ g Receipt Number v /.) d''''/ C---, NDy (v / MOUS VIEW POLICE Case Number 7/0 y � C/ Jlass Itication -'_ OFFENSE REPORT,. Comp Ialnantrs or Victims Name (Firm name If bus lnesi) }; <` 'M ` 4 ` DOB Age Sex Phone:Bus. Last First Middle f ., . . # t::rt�,:' 1/-/3-ha I s) /--s / 7 s ;, { .ia, , - City- State Phone:Res. �o �h s r GS s�► a'l l a ';'.-1- '/L'tq:r Y . Ca�t 1 i.Q Q M1J l g9-ao ?7 Complainant's or V1 dtims Address ' 'i .- Offense or,:Incident • Place Where Offense Occurred ' ,1 ; - Type of Bui'IdIng, (Residence, store, bank, etc.) 5.900 ' tea.fF r2y �r (ci Reported By �/ Phone 'V ':i.: Officer Assigned - r .-•4_•,-4.-,... ',.-.,f".2'.. ';;;`.:._.':.•,.;.---..."....1:4-...-4'.:,," t4 s� Report /\�l H^.� Date and Time of OffenseDate and of Report' 09-19 '- `j/ •. ./7o0 -A c . 1 _ '. 07 -ay- 9[ a/ssGr employee/relative/acquaintance . • 2. } -t.. a rte' 'N ' , ,If #'. r.. Witness Name Best Contact Address -Age Best Phone '. '' Other Phohe .. Parent or Guardian I. t - . ',�; . '4 4.J'is-i 1� .» , a -� . .,.. .t .' ,: ._ if..-,. :ii 2. , , Narrative (Write in any available dell!ls_no+;tovered.libovei,)......:::14,3t-.1:. _' • ' • 0 9 —r ��_7 , or I.J O /3 r s�..«wx.• CA yr f 1'1..e_i: ....: W /-A W r 1 / e .. a V+,L A GP tl! S e c?C • s�, 1,.t a((),K f e.eQ ' r.e_P a 7� . :CM, •: ear a� - 6 e/- - r3 Iter- I.J h• I, 0 C CL r r tO�: . a /- R p c r o 1�C. £t'6.O {1 r r �„ o 9 il-9/• / o f • ,Sa 0 0 ae_7cfr; n _(� Com •. ._ :& utio� :%�1 h�C t e..4. . , ,_e.`Ua.r ...J v Sr900 :V R..l-trcy lJrt✓ 7' 0 /ook: cs S'or4e:y �D.kar �jr,cs64... upP. revj _,i-A.c ,lz.. �x Y-1 e r e , C�rr`p • S-T•a.. tOC. S h¢.. r SP�kC 0 -. et �w.r 4-A••,. M g J t t c»f Iw-)r'If1 Sl-q..itcQ 'fil. !X�_S ~L..'Q.r>� 'OU7'., /r, t.At l7gc • a r__._±.t, �� . . .. _ . ..S .. P ._o ,t.. .. . c r' . c - • - TCS-z. - - �s�.' azr-emm--dam-=,...,,,,---.....1.........0...,.._--.- - - i ! / do t.L r1 c4 Ll- A. K .111....,-,4]._:,:----It sit 12.4", 4.4..�3 it t]a .- I tip _ , . . Cowtp. cS'T-,..T a(X ft,4 L. Al. - / L , Mar f,S a n • 't..)a.s >to, ba cit .../,, - , z Qyj c.,)11 t ze i' A t 7 O `• 4- K V.r e.(n� { se. .. F �e w, • rS1-e1� n `� ;`ICI-v i /-t At.v f K F .cc (.1 v 4.- P ��:. t. ef A,. r0. a. L , j ! / , - ire. -i Sy 1. ) '(pr htr /t -4..) 4 t�1,1- � s OLe r4rt .. r / f 1 -6.s 'f"d � ..'44d a s- i, J`— 7,.r:� A . !, fit.o,.-i i- ,/lJ o r t A 14Q,yti..DY g.-` CTOS t 1 w1.....>. .. -.i (�he.re. ..',She_ . AQcX . Atr, l too �S74rc,h L .: . /-. , (Q lt e�. y fG, Y �. ►c r, Cort S 1;4ppQr' rh !'171'►1p Invest I gator C_ <, 17 ------ w .. quantity , - T PROPERTY:''SToLENiilfc_ -,1',-* ,.,- estimated value ' M•.. r i , (description)'-:: ''' =t Ai., r e- L4.1 1�^_�-�C .. V�v-R_j -:,...7",-t'G A a S , • (A)v.cit+ G r ..: Q ..„&t.Lk v51.4-a, :.� l 441 Wi a, 2 .. Mr � ' 77. l',1r e arf . ,nvt_ . c. , PL, o Crt , ._ , -0�es ,. M - .( o g..G / a v1 h `e l L't a c S h . a v�,�C. ` ¢. o•m : f w 0- ✓ Gk, . .!-r4..T'.. r-a.-•1 et 7L v , `-rrc7 r`^- h¢- .- / .•`0 y, -h e-1►�_-.#1.,,-1;;..(2 _.• q ` _- ` ' ' -// n a ` 1 / 4/ W r ( T G r .,�. Y► 1. � �I-�.l, .a`t:0 rt�� ��C�O�yt.7' e.c�]`- ,. �t.�.Th � /�'l R ✓ 144 h ` • 4 +! S cls 4 t..?�,7 6"`',`d 1Q CS''"•'3;is `►,..dL 'y �' , rf'�rL ..., e_. /h. re) r m.al,r[^v 1.,‘ . . A k o e rl!-V! ..1:-.:',.*:.:-;A-10 1, 7tet 4t 4- c-5 d• M r.. .a S i A u-hsIA.rty t -r /'1Q-I►- n h4 (? IT ; ..ornP 0.Ir .< `t'f / 1 • - 1.--:, -,!,,,,,-;-.,.:::::---,*--i.,-0,,,-.3-.,-4;Lo!,q,,,,---,.--.1.-,-.1?-.-elf 1 I ! . _ - ,/-.:! ! i -; ! i 1 t‘ � / ' /t .,- -0 r x -`. � 4-,,L k R iti�444n--,, .'."•:•,`--,--rz -----.-----!• _ • ' , !et.' S l' g krd .2. � �C ;r1 tos , . fla- /57/. Jr,rET � - qd( VI-S2Q , ,... - - , A. .-•. . . tSvr� ?� .' ijgv2 7�41t So • Gh c c.i( e_61 a K :[.1 P-,�/k t.�C d h i T.s ,- I4E) tY (S-Al 07 .5, • G. Kg tke,h. C.o n.Ta_C'.-.7.-;:-:;;.-' 10. . 4 . ////����y��j}}d f,. c I. /':_.. _._(,c!(t X ff7 e T + - •r .0a 4 tF .fid '� + i.A 1 q • , ` 1 • .47 S } t ► a i S Y k..:=%--4.,---i:,;.--.4 4: - yy7 J ,:-.‘,°-.7., , F -G2cS ! / • 4. - -.* �'§ � �i. ,, it . .. ... .: . • t .«,hs�.j6'.;4�,.�f�eNl +9`"�q,,.ti.. n►"`r'N`r t_. to 1 i A • � .4.1/ x.._ ,..U._ = 0 . - _ / r L . - .. _:yy , 'nc N.'i.N:-?v1(/ ....... ii -., .+... ., .L. .. '..F - A„,l :a �/� P ,/.: C'lJr.✓`p/J.7'C -,x, 1`a , .i rt. e'AK) 174. total 'value to $I . V e iy v 06,9 Y i Ce 'Cre 4,-.,:. .p 9'/41'4 /: a' `. (kS oI. r' stolen by whom recovered ^ ' ownri 6r otifi a^M ' Mime date ,, -recovered t • MI SCELLEANOUS INFORMATION 4.; �K . 4.N N- `„ ,e- :<: , ' - _ ,.,o./ WOUNDS VIEW POLICI': Case Number CIass lfI tIon ' v ' �OfFE.NSE"REPORT F ,, f ,;H , • • : i Complainant's or. Victuals Name (Firm name if.bus tfosfT4 .,., ., ' DOB Age Sex Phone:Bus. Last First ,:•••••;,4.'-'i..MlddII �. 1° c / L4 ,V\_ —), `!vl. `� ' I } Tkl4 f"< F = City State r Phone:Res.4/A Comp laInant's or Victims Address:. :;t'` ' '�'� � Offense or lhcident ,1-_1 - • - 5-2-3 " 49 -, --,- Place Where Offense Occur ed i�y 4 # � ', • type of BRI ding, (Residence, store, bank, etc.) Reporte By - , . .' ,''-:'.-,•1-,.:7-i...1, :•*, , Phone f OF L. . , Officer s i gned , e.: Date and Time of Offense �.... w -kms , , Date and Time of eport - /0�7—�l' �3crO f_•3 ° ? t to '7'=9/ 't . °/ (- Name and Address of Suspect(s)1 DOB/age/htlee/seX/dasefi1 pf,,,1011. 71 _409� '". c 1 rc l e'i f suspect IS: ( F employee/relative/acquaintance _ t14444441-i,-;:if�a `( f "� s " V"' H. w I''t �2N•i� i Y ►til. (�'L', Ort , /r ,r,� y 1 , 2. ,... .:. -:,.•••.. • � ._ ' .. �„fV�`y��fF'+�++�f(�y,', z.ji� �;e?r � ,.- � .. .1 •_ . Witness Name . Best Contac+ Address 1A40 pettaPhOne yt : Other Phone Parent or Guardian r�,$ r,{ wi:. 1. •l% _V 4i s. �t .���,,��,, �4.lYr'P..�.. � 't } ., . '''.1:'.',•-• - , _L .c•+«r•�•...e' �9. +' 3 s i 2. '9 /jNary ti e. (Wriitte/ In any..avei tebfe•detali#Z0a# s $d ead,:dbd,..50,`7 1i,./>..��-, ._•,5 -4., A Ni; 3 . W � i)....,'.. .y{"[ t .'-', 1,,. Y t�✓�c.I: f/V� : tl1-v !.J : (sV✓t� Alk-e-sf r x....5 .tea,= >, , ,r h • • ;„ ) • .,4 i : :ti..e.„, ::-.;-';',:41., 1:-: •••: •:: ,....,. .-•tie _•• •Ik. eerlitn ,, 1.A".44.-,, „;A.4...i.;Ar 4."......... )� 4u 4204k t , : it /� c j► ` aft W ' 'Alt,'.,,,,,l ?Ae iik:3 `i' ,+: /� s .y��• �� L/� 1„// '�� tiriml,i.Qs .!Y •.k'.t t!g ..: :-- - ;I &bf ysV,► .t "--1A a ^.• /`K-.�'. - H.; 3fc.treef y rv,+c ,{. sL;.wi'r _-x"4.1. -tti ,CoifJ,I{. . r - 1-1 :�. • -7ti .... . iE_.b)" ��i�JJ//�'i .., P"'Y� })i'( ,1 _ I:.ri.; .� (J"�+sy. 1/ ,/1 )C , _remigrIMAINImirmillisistr /` .` . A._' i I AI,-ice.; ':'. �ktilk®.q Cid ''��/:almmw"' l�/ J rte, I �•�`• f1 ,-41/A aV. .' • .e� i !i : F.A+tet :: !�� /. t� .:. .. , . AA._ A .1 'jai •dv...sl A - J..'..a�. Im.MOVIMIIT- i. , 4y~ - .,▪ 7 6 ! IN. I� .r ...tea` Iliirola A •Ai ,A 41, •.,6. Lar -Fmr.1s.,a. irl•�C .tea. .�.A:/ !�atLr. • _ / 411,61 :mo' _ `l . i[` . r . tl �,Yr'� _ , y • • Investigator a512___ • • • • • - , ' ! . .!- !r s ►;44 !' t . i'1 .y'n••411_._- s$S, P � � -rWipWill l.-444k�wjir. . . V { y • 4 t °i� 7i 1 > ff c quantity ` ° �- "� 1 t�Pgr2 SfiOt, tt t .4 �+t : m e €itttated value • ,!'-'•.;:\ b _ms`µ .: w 4;;+yE:l" `-i ;V.• -r.( .y • ? ' J'• • ,F ro L✓. '^_S'...'vaYr' - ` r f!, •J', r 1 I'MC�/1 c r s , • • - /.....€44,..,: ��.... 4 s- / ,sem r n,.-;lei':// I '��� -. ► a • ' S s !t1is, / / lJt xfi rr/ y yrs - tt' -f file ` $ !y,,ys`v- �'i 'h 11 $s /�.�t; : :E 1!+�f ,s t• 1'. r v;i i _ ' ' ]}tom t !1 � , . • ••4}� � }�•d'f - @l ',.::1 '7%--''. ,:-.•:14`• + ; ''40'"i'-','-'4•4' �¢ , - 1.. 3-.-,r;Y,.. SIJ Y• '�� 4v / ' A • i. _• '- ' ♦ �c:..::',-.4.-"!".'47.1,i iii ,r"qV f l+y,: #'r- '' r is 1 -• I- ! • t 1 .f- - _ '�3" ,, .„.. .`M.fi Fv. ..,,,.M 1 i{.1.0,.,:, , lk I_ 4.1 {' t7 ( Y fe -�� • .A.iiY. - s IFe b, i ,a•' ;-{ ' � � • ;. wqct-•a..�t ,4iv et1 rr, ,. i nI.'I _77 ' . .f 'k .i . i, "-- �* ,t--3,i, .y -v..7-----..c , .'4 p , i+.,.a ' � I1� .4/11+4`, „ R4I• .. � 4}� •� ; •.O, • _ >r..r.,- -1 � -, a x" � y: S Ii -• x;, {I 1.1 { .r 4 .,. fir. , ,...-F .+ Ir i sr-` v y b = °•**:-4'-!--k"' " ' L-� • ' v ,nek%`'C AUC ! . •,y�5 , i 'S ( 4 f zl 6 ...//'1'441''''"_0,4"''' •!";" X_ f y - M r � - � � s...] �{�� a/T'/MISE":f4 � �� 1,b s -_y v • V"'��, .y>« (8 i ak d ' f p' iws�..e • PJ .t. 4,?!„,!.,-„,, - . :J t //J}'�t as.•.>'* 14,1 9� e' I+*b•., , •�- V. rA. d ¢ l fit '•at 1f i,, .. i�.~ ; f1 amu,. ;' 'G�,�Ci d-t�-tit`- -C- 4 - - , . .. .,.•::, /) 'pit• .-: . ` ° �a.i "IL,'•'``'sly'.' 4 Ji -l�FJ' x t1(.`�q ., 9 i r..-� z A _ - .. - / k -.:-.74.,!,-."-� iL ; , .;_<• r5 t x.,•. t ;-a,*iii:,.-,- S •s. t r,. .• 1 �.. :, f �fj��� ea.x . 1. r ,t..v.', • hh ����trr y ,tiI' tt '"''r 4 ! r -0.-../+ � ,.W i • .. '. tom,,fes '� t&. .N ab '4,1 - 'e r ,44•4,3k,44,1., i.e s '-t f# �sf- ,-i..;., - -• •r ..-;..::.,44-...,--4,. .--..4..•} k'. 4. • v ,,,Th' r '1-1 = r e 4 ! ,t. /-5I ramal • 14:. .. r '4-14-.•: / +� - F''''. ... f ,/ '•(J ,a,• ..tea s 01*.er.�,. u, •- +,, ��I►,, , ., L� ^.t 44.,,E ti ,k- ��„ - ! - _;_{,,,,,,/,',,s". R h ' _�, s .' .� 'p-i'y j i• -1 L.- - /-' : CO �f.� %ah �c 4 �,. fr. ' PC) OP P 3 - .� / � O 1 g > r- " i �. • �i �4 .i a ,� /, :7 / / irii ...•.. ••4 kA .'n ,.w.e •..... i saw r.;e• m - ' i • e , - i •. �,i 7 ..e, • 3 r , e , total tralue • i - _'� `Y' 1,� zt "&`"'�� "`' ".,-.•4 J _g • ",� "�+ {l q ..�.s r t•{ _ .r..� by whom recovered �w te - ▪ ~ ie y j ' dat4o;' recovered ti .. 4W h�' � it"h - s3; -' ...il -MISCELLE_ANOUS INFORMATION. -'k iy,. k:s,,:°,,..,R, „ }4 4'' 4,:;4#, •1.4_ A. ��� 3 "' 1" t • 1 4.'b Y�4'+JS --,,...--# -m--,....... ;{ ,a•+ "'s Y• * ' �fSV` rk } it b1 I.. . ! • 1 ` 4- ,Y .e.�4,•JAv� is.i:_ �s '- 1.,! d r r 4 .r. J • sx* , -_4 e 'r � t s `. w ` ; Y' e f-,:' '.• a a. . .r,:_ r — S. .c- • ' -. 3 a 1 ry } W a4i: , . . . „ . . Mounds View • ..- • ' . . i- -• -- • - . . Police Dept. SUPPLEMENTARY,:;,,-:I NVEST I GAT I ON REPORT ... . • OFFENSE: ' 0 elQ ee; 7/ , . • •case #7/6.A-1 6 9',r Y COMP LA I NANT I (0 -Jrs el n i P');r.h a re, I Pe) page I tTE: re/i0/9/ TIME: io 1r-b . .. . d 2Z--- ,I-in,l,ed.. ' iii; / A 122,.c. , -;22 a f• /A /2712B J.5. 77 . Id he r ' 7" ./2 e e of e ed a • (7 el f)i of 71 AI"' i' el Ls e 1 e i'::',21-J :A.eei':•/(-_, , 5A wirwawswairamfe.A......A.e.,........Aw....—.........i.......__Re_ ___•__ -- . -, 4 - ..e r __ ,5-. A ei 1 S' • , -.:2—: 74 A t'' i') 71 ei /ri h e r 77:-. 'el..,,..1): :1-el_.. ._.. i.h .10:: . ..h.....7 17 e r ,. /6 a /0 /Ai ./9/. '';‘ ,..-74z;el.:.,-1: 14 ,0 Je Ot_ -7/ S_Aco. A.} 6_,_5 72e) - .A t >e . , / . d01, _5 . ) . i / (77/69 ' ' _1 e' rc.• /7 ,5 c A9 1 -.3ttr'atr.Cn--',0:" ,,:1-',',1:;''151.--:i:;':.41'?-1`..., • ' - ,-- .. ' i' - -.' '''' . -- . f.L.,,..) no r . , ...- . . . . . , • . . . .. . . a ,,, ti• d' -ei: -.,-:-d--i.e. .)", r; 1„4_ 91 .5' a Li/ 4 el 71- A hel_X e• i• A, -1:2.,q,_(: . 4 - :i .4 . . ..... . . .. . , A ) i it .' X 0' • ..• i • " ' ; --....,::-,: ,.:: d i ; .. , /JJ e-i i 9 e Z-- 1 ,t2e^ S 4.z10 7-.S -- '' v.5-12e ,3.-- / 40 rs^-ie'' 14J il‘') 6 Ab " ,zi--------cw-igii__24, 71"6ri4,-) „ar : :-.., - A5-7/1^e•',c,f(4-'0/ • 71-c) A f-, Y-- • -- 1- .-ii-.1 ...i. l''' T,,..:. ,.:,! , , / / c, e .A 6 c71 ' t e'. ) ...f.:.'-'/7_,c1. 1./ e (Pi t 5t. .1) re- "2,5 (- • -: ,--i-,--t-:,----,,,,kiT . ' . . ger... •• ' . -• /3 i ri-, ri n ci 6y 8 -c• -.1 ‘..-.7..t-,;,2. /) • ,1 C_3 ' iq es,-/"9 a 4--;.,,,-:,,i,!,,,,,,-,,i. / /.3.2 /9' / /22 /,'e)/2 S : e? ri • 1..:2 Ih'r") 7L•A 6 -7C- .' 71-At, i f' A ,- . - ':,-1---,. -- ,:. . -: - : - ''. - . . ••• . .• -- . - . - i • ; /2 .. . - ... /. - áy _ /6/07 / i 9/ , „ • .. , .. .- ..., . . . LAW ENFORCEMENT INITIAL COMPLAINT REPORT MESS.KEY CONTROL NUMBER(OCA) CONE.AGENCY NCIC`WENT.ICAO) MOUNDS VIEW E 1 c 1 I / [ 912. 1c.) , 131 S i l t Q) / (MINI I t I t I t1/ POLICE I.NAR DATEtREPORTED IIRPO) TIME RPO ITRP) LOCATION GRID NBA ILON) n , ( chi r 1 2-1G I !-1z_ / $ -iV 1 o t 9 I / , I it I II ,&1/ PLACE COMMITTED(PLC) -: 152 2 9' 12,2/Pa./ell '_ > I I 1 t I low I-NOR O SQUAD OR()AMIE 0 ISBN) TIME AVG.(TAS) .(TAR) TIME CLR.(TCL )9RO Codas T f1 / f�1 / I t I / r 017 I / 1 71,c)tc.�I91 / Igto ,& .5 I / I2tuI 'L. ( / Phone R •Radio I MIR ISN U C UCS UCS CODES A -Alarm ,,tt�� •Pending J •CIAO/Arrest..1v. It •R .Oth.Avera. f .In Person EI / I i / I t?t t V 15 1 / P ; C •Ex6./CLRO A •CLRO/Aped Aduft-• S -AWL/Advised U -Unfounded Juv. O -OOA/UTL V -Visual R � °nc T -Otherr M •Mail Complainant: �Y=t- ,Ad C"Comti_S ki phone # 7 2 {- -k, ( _ T •Other Address: ?...-Sc) .I'r'a=te 1 ek-V Complaint: L-490 ( 00 ,14/l 0,entP)) •Zcc YDOGS frkAsjiSOl,/5 / AOYC25 Incident Description: MAIJ.SVOSt L (3- Lkiet.E. ILIdtN MENG Loos (/J Tett N I.6twt-L J1 !n)c-2tou- ` cw..A.4PcS YAft.ts . ate (S C_ONE�t Gly A-IC-Cr S Q ectSE ':.: cc)A4 6, t5 L -4z z- e/ L Som c...)45 P t tI.Y AT c2151- 'o+ .0" -5 S at-{Ectt€-0 ?--- -OE NO 611Z011 t-f:0D (ut- s-,:'Coc c,tb ACr Mio 1 ISS• Addt'1 Repts Ait ( Enter CJRS �',�'� /4'31)2E-SS — a�o>~-�F{�.°=cdU�r�..f�$►Ma✓5-�-��: Wcx�r..�. 3 1 •A • I' Z.. •'4I v' eibtkr'ASFlk` b ' DATE ' ''CirriCODE ' -rk 3 .a t� iRv�"•4�� o ♦ /, •icW°- .-A ,A. ...5..-A.,,...1!- t r ,n�i�.�-/o � F2` ,h .'-',41-1'9.-,It Kr1*t !r_ ;'y 7 GRID' •-4- -,...',� 7.1“.`..',.),...44: QCAION INCIDENT, s1rt.0 `2{ 4 ,aSQUADaA,.' ,J BADGE • j yyS!Yi S^x- .- s r rit - t 6 • s,., 3 r . .i "'1"....14.4'IAI{ 1'0U'+t } -%'``� em `},-wi" .`�-r_ '1 1 t L `c F f i t _ IA ;; . 141.' t. PHONE . : • .▪ �..a;�77 I -• s J 1r! SP r•1 a t '. ..=ASSISTING UADS. . - f v, `7.777 --�� r •! ��� SADGE 1 SENT .. CLEAR ' ▪ � Q�Ol1` � i'" �r+�}`� p 4� .� s�,� a � 1� �. Ir k i; [SL , .21 . : i 3 ,�.ggg i.raft ., �e;r; S4,,,-d ---4 dd �r }A: ��¢ i v i •.t _ � o- ao' „t }:4i•Y _• -4 1...f.!.-1..__ "sem ___ /t�.3 Ivi.' 1r ! a a, >' . t t.t ' e► t x' �. °` ' ".��"( z; ,'fit'' 14. k t j as • a !,...4).1.--,-1..' ,L�` - .. :� a i j.: a:.` � ra�`"� .- i��'s� *"'i.-.-,f- �ti y s ; ty`r- -,yy v'A i I�- , L F sxFa1'r i 7� R yyy;q - n r er o {4 y s ;Vss: T'*. ,: -r L ric..i Lvu ,0, t} v' ,,..4r..„ Ail�'') ti 1 i.„,, � e f :.. }' ,'1•1� It.; I t % ' e: 4 .S-., s .,, ,...6.,164'1-14 r t MST, 1 i,j5? t Te' �r zrwii ,a4'''� }, 14'i w t )1../e.:4: rw f "= , 399 33,, t 7P' aka f:a, � r11f 1 a' to t .f2 ,'"..' {�. s :^.. ..1., l II} { z 34t tla'' f - t i- f j� yr n '�.'E -1,2,,/,a1' "4i� *s� i.�;MT�Y ## zy;, {S,i" s* if {{f �-'i'. a ',.{'s 7 �+ F < l'!.i t s':'''...'f'..06.03 .1 E� 7 t. ..cr `'rvd � ,, t 1 (��1 A 1, F.�.� 71"s tA ��`.$ •.4,...,-';',-4',,,%:45211"t:_:::'.1 ?-',- i�dlr�f'� ''�d'��;�i�..-:- 1 tit;r e- . ..,.:-.-74-....i.,:-._::dt ,1,-,„.-,.1,04 ;...- _.. ) • #f-,...17.4/A- '.K: A1' y,,:, 7 '.itz flf -',1 t �^y.”-1 l FaJ' dr It t e#'Xg1 ? 5 U. ;r- . ;a+ �;' '�y ' It F7 r4 j n} Pip 1',�.-:i i.4`. !A-4.i.'''44'1.4..• .dt'j .iANI.i01',,t'S j t. t44a-u t "7, 4 11, r � i r ;9 ''' t -rp'r F a. i,FDISP i t3za# yet= �''h.r f �^ "`iyA t o �` i t r 3 F 4• • 't,21:r,,.. �y� �Li+Mg3 .fx`� haFnt �r, cs f; i'��� )P:�'� tl �,�.t}q � *, t �t'y�y nit�-!.a 1 1•1CV I)�� Af14 <1,0v.: ,3�sR pxJ" t{i:i:i2 T£ $ c ,E,z �°tI '(�iiiI- � ii.,',, t : !4 t ,ttk y P ar _� .,i .4-..#4 i 7 1' ii T"av' .v41-1' �,,• ...Sr 11 r 1'1 J{,r,Wa3 ',7441v1 fii',4 7�... b RESOLUTION NO. 341-92 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF THE REQUEST BY LONNIE MADISON FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL DOG KENNEL ON HIS PROPERTY AT 5200 JEFFERY DRIVE PLANNING CASE NO. 339-91 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Lonnie Madison for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the establishment of a residential dog kennel at 5200 Jeffery - • _ •• WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Mounds View Municipal Code and recognizes that the Code allows for residential dog kennels with a Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, Chapter 40. 25 Subdivision C (1-6) outlines the criteria by which all Conditional Use Permit requests are reviewed. WHEREAS, past complaints on the site have not been remediated; four complaints have been received in the past year. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends to the City Council denial of the requested Conditional Use Permit based upon the following: 1. Control and restraint of animals continues to be a problem on the kennel site. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 15th day of July, 1992 . (ATTEST) Chairman (SEAL) Planner RESOLUTION NO. 4261 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION DENYING THE REQUEST BY LONNIE MADISON FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL DOG KENNEL ON HIS PROPERTY AT 5200 JEFFERY DRIVE PLANNING CASE NO. 339-91 WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the request of Lonnie Madison for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the • - - ' •ential do• kennel at 5200 Jeffery Drive; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Mounds View Municipal Code and recognizes that the Code allows for residential dog kennels with a Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, Chapter 40 .25 Subdivision C ( 1-6) outlines the criteria by which all Conditional Use Permit requests are reviewed; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended denial in Resolution No. 341-92 . NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council denies the requested Conditional Use Permit based upon the following: 1. Control and restraint of the animals continues to be a problem on the proposed kennel site. Adopted this 27th day of July, 1992 . (ATTEST) Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator Agenda Section: 7, 7:15 p.m. II INos REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-177c Report Date: 7_23-92 STAFF REPORT E Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE July 27, 1992 Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Resolution No. 4262 Approving a Conditional Use Permit to Allow For an Oversized Accessory Structure at 7074 Knollwood Drive, Planning Case No. 347-92 Administrator's Review/Recommendation: t - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY: Patrick and Cathy Stampfle, 7074 Knollwood Drive, have made application for a conditional , use permit to allow for an oversized accessory building. Chapter 40. 10 Subdivision D (7) of the Mounds View Municipal Code allows for accessory buildings in excess of 216 square feet, but not exceeding 400 square feet, with the issuance of a conditional use permit. The applicants request is for a 280 square foot accessory building. This request has been reviewed by the Mounds View Planning Commission and found to be in conformance with all applicable sections of the Municipal Code. Planning Commission Resolution No. 342-92 recommending approval of the request is attached for your review. City Council Resolution No. 4262 is provided for your review and consideration. % ._ i `Paul Harrington, Ci y Planner RECOMMENDATION; Adopt City Council Resolution No. 4262 approving a conditional use permit to allow for an oversized accessory structure at 7074 Knollwood Drive, Planning Case No. 347-92 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION APPLICANT: Phone 77.3 -/5r7 ADDRESS: 707` 1/ tj c l/hvv,Los V/16-(_ , mow/ SsI/7.— . Z. Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code Interest in Property (check appropriate box): Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee, Operator, Manager ❑ Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other (explain) Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before final City action of this request. PROPERTY INVOLVED: Address/General Location 7o/ 4 K,.lcU i o D pg_ 5e-71060 / 2 4 ��fr- Legal Owner: Name/Address PA ni i ci4 C A-r.I% s- + a 7 c/ ,La/o`(-. WOO t7 DFS. MOU).(OS Vi 4) , I�YI S S—/l Z, Present Use (check appropriate box): ❑ UndevelopedNacant a Single Family Dwelling ❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling • ❑ Multi-Family (No. of Units ) ❑ Business/Commercial Establishment ❑ Industrial Establishment ❑ Other (explain) Property Classification: Jj Abstract 0 Torrens REQUEST: ,o►,roi-nota_, , vs9 -r T3 un L ae. ox,s7-71,/4 /SAX Za L�u�2A-G /v2 u : ;4—s SSG I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUE. Signature ******************************************************************************************** Rezoning $200/acre,minimum$200,maximum$1,000 Park Fund Dedication Fee Variance R-1 to R-2-$75,all others$200 Date Paid Conditional Use Permit R-1 to R-2-$75,all others$200 Receipt Number Code Appeal $75 Develop./Site Plan Review $100/acre,minimum 100,maximum $500 Additional Fees Paid Minor Subdivision $150 Date Paid Major Subdivision $250 plus$250 deposit Receipt Number Comp. Plan Amendment $200 Wetland Alteration Permit $50 plus deposit determined by Staff TOTAL FEES PAID '7% •''0 Wetland Buffer Permit $10 DATE PAID - tr- Planning Sign $50 RECEIPT NUMBER %= 7 r7 PUD $350 PUD Amendment $150 Date of final action APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED 0 Date J - - Planning Case No. i3 147- a Admin.Account No. rietxi rP.1 May 18, 1992 Mr. Paul Harrington, City Planner City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Harrington, As per our discussion on May 18th, I have supplied you with a plot plan of 7074 Knollwood Drive, with the proposed plan to build a new garage. My understanding from our discussion, was that only one curb-cut (driveway) and one garage per residential lot. As you can see on the - attached drawing, I have an existing 14' X 20' garage which I would like to utilize for a utility shed to store lawn mowers, snowblower, lawn tools, etc. You indicated that I would need a variance because of the size of the existing garage which exceeds the square footage specified by Mounds View for a storage shed. I also understand that the existing driveway must be torn up to allow for the new driveway. The attached print shows the area of driveway which I plan to eliminate. If--you-have-any-questions, feel free to-contact-me: 641-4688 (days) 783-1557 (evenings) Thank you Pat Stampfle MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 342-92 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY PATRICK AND CATHY STAMPFLE FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN OVERSIZED ACCESSORY BUILDING ON THEIR PROPERTY AT 7074 KNOLLWOOD DRIVE, PLANNING CASE NO. 347-92 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission as reviewe• the request of Patrick and Cathy Stampfle for a conditional use permit to allow an oversized accessory building in the rear yard of their property at 7074 Knollwood Drive; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Zoning Code and recognizes that the Code allows a 400 square foot accessory building with a conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the proposed accessory building is 280 square feet which is within the square footage allowed with a conditional use permit; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit contingent upon the following: 1. The Conditional Use Permit is recorded with Ramsey County. 2 . The building shall be maintained to provide a uniform appearance with the dwelling unit. 3 . The accessory building does not exceed 400 square feet. 4. Theonly vehicles-that may be-stored in the-accessory building are licensed collector vehicles. 5. The accessory building must conform with sections 40. 04 , Subd. F and 40. 10, Subd. C(2) of the Zoning Code. 6. Should the use for which the permit was granted be changed, the permit shall be subject to reconsideration, revocation or other action as regulated by Chapter 40. 25 of this Code. 7 . The existing driveway shall be removed and disposed of in an environmental manner. RESOLUTION NO. 342-92 PAGE TWO BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 1st day of July, 1992 . ATTEST: Chairman (SEAL) City Planner i RESOLUTION NO. 4262 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REQUEST BY PATRICK AND CATHY STAMPFLE FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN OVERSIZED ACCESSORY BUILDING ON THEIR PROPERTY AT 7074 KNOLLWOOD DRIVE, PLANNING CASE NO. 347-92 WHEREAS the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the request of Patrick and Cathy Stampfle for a conditional use permit to allow an oversized accessory building in the rear yard of their property at 7074 Knollwood Drive; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Zoning Code and recognizes that the Code allows up to a 400 square foot accessory building with a conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the proposed accessory building is 280 square feet which is within the square footage allowed with a conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has recommended approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit in Resolution No. 342-92 . NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the requested Conditional Use Permit contingent upon the following: 1. The Conditional Use Permit is recorded with Ramsey County. 2 . The building shall be.maintained to provide a uniform appearance with the dwelling unit. 3 . The accessory building does not exceed 400 square feet. 4 . The only vehicles that may be stored in the accessory building are licensed collector vehicles . 5 . The accessory building must conform with sections 40.04, Subd. F and 40 . 10, Subd. C(2) of the Zoning Code. RESOLUTION NO. 4262 PAGE TWO Adopted this 27th day of July, 1992 . ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report : 9, 7:20 p.m. 11lf, ����� Q Report Number: 92-328C STAFF REPORT Report Date: 7-23-92 EW Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE July 27, 1992 Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: 1992 LONG TERM FINANCIAL PLAN Administrator's Review/Recommendation: 7- - No comments to supplement this report OVII` - Comments attached. Explanation/Sumpary (attach supplement shnecessary_) $UMMARY; Attached please find a revised copy of the 1992 Capital Improvements Program of the 1992 Long Term Financial Plan (LTFP) which was revised at the July 21 Council Study Session. The Public Service portion of the LTFP remains unchanged. The City Charter requires that the Plan be adopted by Ordinance. A proposed Ordinance is attached for your consideration. The first reading of the Ordiance is scheduled for the July 27,1992 Council meeting. RECOMMENDATIONt Donald Brager, Financ irector CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET DETAIL - 1993 EXPENDITURES G-/ cc -9-- 100-4120 GENERAL FUND ADMINISTRATION 1990 1991 1992 1992 DEPARTMENT TEAM COUNCIL ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED ESTIMATED REQUESTS REQUESTS APPROVES PERSONNEL SERVICES 010 SALARIES, REGULAR $98,485 $81,408 $85,804 $85,804 $100,398 $0 $0 011 OVERTIME, REGULAR $468 $35 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 030 PENSIONS $8,347 $10,454 $10,408 $10,408 $12,178 $0 $0 040 GROUP INSURANCE $4,168 $5,790 $8,378 $8,378 $9,412 $0 $0 050 WORKERS COMPENSATION $359 $229 $463 $463 $472 $0 $0 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES $114,988 $98,046 $105,053 $105,053 $122,460 $0 $0 MATERIALS + SUPPLIES 160 SUPPLIES, OPERATING $585 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 210 BOOKS + PERIODICALS $809 $630 $620 $620 $750 $0 $0 TOTAL MATERIALS + SUPPLIES $1,394 $630 $620 $620 $750 $0 $0 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 303 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERV $7,131 $7,218 $31,050 $31,050 $11,185 $0 $0 342 ADVERTISEMENTS $1,470 $483 $750 $750 $700 $0 $0 343 PRINTING $322 $67 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $0 $0 361 MEMBERSHIPS $578 $511 $1,040 $1,040 $1,170 $0 $0 362 CONFERENCES $299 $130 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 363 TRAINING $2,748 $4,679 $6,550 $6,550 $8,214 $0 $0 380 MILEAGE $2,700 $1,992 $1,800 $1,800 $2,400 $0 $0 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $15,248 $15,080 $43,190 $43,190 $25,669 $0 $0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 703 EQUIPMENT $0 $350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 $350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL ADMINISTRATION $131,630 $114,106 $148,863 $148,863 $148,879 $0 $0 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET NARRATIVE FUND: General DEPARTMENT: Elections DEPARTMENT OBJECTIVE The objective of the Elections Department is to provide for fair and efficient federal, state and county and municipal elections. DEPARTMENT ACTIVIITt✓S The Election Department Budget funds those election activities of the City which includes the maintenance of voting and ballot counting equipment, supplies, administration services and election judges for the biannual elections. DEPARTMENT GOALS The goal of the Elections Department is to provide the personnel, equipment and supplies necessary to conduct efficient and legal elections. DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURE COMMENTS The 1993 expenditure for this department is $4,600 less than the 1992 budget and is indicative of the City's practice of budgeting approximately one-half of the cost of elections in a non-election year (1993) and then appropriating a like amount of Fund Balance in an election year (1994). 'ersonne expen•i-T - • - . : : - :: ::: . = : = incorporating the previously designated four voting precincts into one City-wide precinct. This action, which was approved by Council in 1992, reduced both the number and expenditures for election judges. Overall expenditures are less because there will not be a Presidential Primary election to be budgeted for in 1994. CITY OF HOUNDS VIEW DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET DETAIL - 1993 EXPENDITURES 06/17/92 100-4140 GENERAL FUND ELECTIONS 1990 1991 1992 1992 DEPARTMENT TEAM COUNCIL ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED ESTIMATED REQUESTS REQUESTS APPROVES PERSONNEL SERVICES 020 SALARIES, TEMP/PART-TIME $6,053 $0 $7,080 $7,080 $2,178 $0 $0 030 PENSIONS $169 $0 $542 $542 $44 $0 $0 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES $6,222 $0 $7,622 $7,622 $2,222 $0 $0 MATERIALS + SUPPLIES 114 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES $4 $7 $0 $0 $225 $0 $0 160 SUPPLIES, OPERATING $753 $0 $1,000 $1,000 $500 $0 $0 TOTAL MATERIALS + SUPPLIES $757 . $7 $1,000 $1,000 $725 $0 $0 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 303 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERV $1,944 $236 $500 $500 $625 $0 $0 341 LEGAL NOTICES $418 $21 $500 $500 $600 $0 $0 343 PRINTING $625 $0 $650 $650 $500 $0 $0 513 REPAIRS,EQUIPMENT $316 $0 $400 $400 $1,400 $0 $0 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $3,303 $257 $2,050 $2,050 $3,125 $0 $0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 703 EQUIPMENT $6,009 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ------- ------- ------- TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $6,009 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND_TOTAL-ELECTIONS/_VOTER_REGIST $16,291 $264 $10,672 $10,672 $6,072 $0 $0 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET NARRATIVE FUND: General DEPARTMENT: Finance DEPARTMENT OBJECTIVE To provide financial planning, financial reporting and accounting services to the City Council, Clerk-Administrator and Department Heads. DEPARTMENT ACTIVITIES The Finance Department oversees and coordinates the financial activities of the City. Activities include: preparation of the Long-Term Financial Plan and Annual Budget; preparation of monthly and annual financial reports, accounting services, investments, management of insurance programs, debt management, and oversees the City's general purchasing program. DEPARTMENT GOALS The overall goal of the Finance Department is to efficiently collect and receipt monies due to the City, to promptly pay the City's obligations, to inform the Council and residents of the results of those financial activities through the preparation of timely and accurate financial reports, and to assist the City Council and City Staff in financial planning. DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURE COMMENTS Personne services cos . % • I ' - - - Budget. Staffing levels remain unchanged from the previous year. Staff consists of the Finance Director, an Accountant, Utility Accounting Clerk (paid from the Water and Sewer Funds), and an Accounting Clerk (paid from: Finance Department 50%; Water Fund 25% and Sewer Fund 25%). The remainder of the Finance Department is for printing of checks, forms, budget books, auditing services and training. 1 _ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET DETAIL - 1993 EXPENDITURES (0-( -9.a-- 100-4150 2--100-4150 GENERAL FUND FINANCE 1990 1991 1992 1992 DEPARTMENT TEAM COUNCIL ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED ESTIMATED REQUESTS REQUESTS APPROVES PERSONNEL SERVICES 010 SALARIES, REGULAR $85,385 $91,779 $90,224 $90,224 $104,228 $0 $0 011 OVERTIME, REGULAR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 020 SALARIES, TEMP/PART-TINE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 030 PENSIONS $9,961 $10,693 $10,944 $10,944 $12,644 $0 $0 040 GROUP INSURANCE $6,675 $7,500 $8,550 $8,550 $9,300 $0 $0 050 WORKERS COMPENSATION $372 $233 $488 $488 $490 $0 $0 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES $102,393 $110,205 $110,206 $110,206 $126,662 $0 $0 MATERIALS + SUPPLIES 210 BOOKS + PERIODICALS $200 $323 $460 $460 $470 $0 $0 TOTAL MATERIALS + SUPPLIES $200 $323 $460 $460 $470 $0 $0 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 303 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERV $14,071 $9,981 $8,970 $8,970 $10,050 $0 $0 343 PRINTING $3,445 $2,902 $2,198 $2,198 $3,143 $0 $0 361 MEMBERSHIPS $15 $250 $155 $155 $165 $0 $0 362 CONFERENCES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 363 TRAINING $2,900 $2,124 $3,550 $3,550 $4,375 $0 $0 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $20,431 $15,257 $14,873 $14,873 $17,733 $0 $0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 703 EQUIPMENT $4,963 $4,850 $9,483 $9,483 $3,750 $0 $0 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $4,963 $4,850 $9,483 $9,483 $3,750 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL FINANCE $127,987 $130,635 $135,022 $135,022 $148,615 $0 $0 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET NARRATIVE FUND: General DEPARTMENT: Legal DEPARTMENT OBJECTIVE The Legal Department provides all general legal assistance and prosecution to the City. DEPARTMENT ACTIVl'1'IbS The City Attorney provides general legal assistance to the City and prosecutes all misdemeanor offenses. DEPARTMENT GOALS The goal of the City Attorney is to provide the best legal advice and service to the City. DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURE COMMENTS In 1992 general legal and prosecution services were separated and a new law firm, Holmes and Graven with Jim Thomson named as attorney, was selected to represent the City in all general legal matters. Prosecution will be handled by a separate attorney. While—the decision to not-have the-City Attorney-present-at-most-Council-meetings - . . . . - - 4 •I . 1 • - - expenditure increase. CITY OF HOUNDS VIEW DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET DETAIL - 1993 EXPENDITURES Co- 1 6 -9 Q_ 100-4160 GENERAL FUND LEGAL 1990 1991 1992 1992 DEPARTMENT TEAM COUNCIL ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED ESTIMATED REQUESTS REQUESTS APPROVES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 301 GENERAL LEGAL SERVICE $35,034 $24,037 $30,000 $30,000 $40,000 $0 $0 302 PROSECUTING ATTY SERVICE $52,449 $40,869 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 303 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERV $0 ($100) $0 $0 $530 $0 $0 361 MEMBERSHIPS $311 $485 $500 $500 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $87,794 $65,291 $80,500 $80,500 $90,530 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL LEGAL $87,794 $65,291 $80,500 $80,500 $90,530 $0 $0 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET NARRATIVE FUND: General DEPARTMENT: Public Works - Engineering & Planning DEPARTMENT OBJECTIVE This year the Engineering and Planning departments are being combined into one department. Since mid-1990 the departments have worked closely together under supervision of the City Engineer/Director of Public Works. Employees are shared between the departments and the consolidation into one department is a logical next step. The objective of the Engineering & Planning Department is to coordinate development and use of land in the City to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinances, Building Codes, Housing Codes, and Devlopment Regula- tions of the City. Recycling and Solid Waste Disposal coordination are also responsi- bilities of the department. Additionally, administration of all Public Works activities is provided by this department. These activities include the City Maintenance Garage, the Street Department, Water Operations and Sewer Operations. DEPARTMENT ACTIVITIES Major activities include daily administration and long term planning for all depart- ments involved in Public Works. The Planner and Building Inspector review zoning applications, special use permits, and building permits as they pertain to various City Codes and State statutes including building safety, fire code requirements, setbacks, land use, and similar issues. The department also reviews the issues involved with major developments and reports to the Planning Commission and City Council regarding the proposed development and impacts of the proposals. In addition, the recycling efforts of the City are coordinated through this department. DEPARTMENT GOALS Review the zoning and sign codes and propose necessary revisions. Improve Recycling efforts in the City and integrate those efforts with Solid Waste Disposal. Catalog City infra-structure on the Geographic Information System to provide computerized reference for all land parcels in the City. Complete the revision and updates of the project and record drawing files. Provide effective and efficient housing and building inspection services. Initiate projects under the Local Water Management Plan. Complete the Street Rehabilitation Plan and implement projects for repair, Agenda Section: 8.A nlor ONUS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-329C STAFF REPORT Report Date: 7-23-92 fr � J Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE July 2 7, 19 9 2 ❑ Public Hearings [$ Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Set Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m. , August 10, 1992 for Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Accessory Building, 2454 County Road H2 Administrator's Review/Recommendation: 0,,,A - No comments to supplement this report 5 - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY: Robert Stauner has made application to allow an oversized accessory structure on his property at 2454 County Road H2 . Mounds View Municipal Code Chapter 40. 10 Subdivision D (7) allows for an accessory structure in excess of 216 square feet but, not exceeding 400 square feet. The applicant is proposing a 352 square foot building. Municipal Code requires that a public hearing be held for the consideration of all Conditional Use Permit applications. Currently, the request is at the Planning Commission level. Staff will be providing the Council with all materials received as part of the application prior to the public hearing. Z--- t_ Paul Harri ton, City Planner RECOMMENDATION; Set public hearing for 7: 05 p.m. on August 10, 1992 to consider request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow an oversized accessory building at 2454 County Road H2, Planning Case No. 348-92 . Agenda Section: 8.B IIIDSEW REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-330C STAFF REPORT Report Date: 7-23-92 Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE July 27. 1992 El Public Hearings [X Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Resolution No. 4258 Authorizing the Purchase of a Plain Paper Fax Machine Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report / - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) 'SUMMARY: Lately there have been numerous complaints about how difficult it is been to read and handle faxed messages received by the City. The existing fax machine is 6 years old and is the thermo paper type, which is the flimsy, curly paper. For the past two weeks, three plain paper faxes have been demonstrated to and used by City Staff. The fax machines are all similarly priced, have similar per copy costs and have similar features as well. The fax machines we looked at were: Fujitsu dex720 • $2000 for fax machine • $130 for toner/developer - 9000 copy yield • $180 for drum - 19000 copy yield • $.024 per copy cost • $275 upgrade memory from 20 to 100 pages Canon L700 • $2061 for fax machine • $96 for toner/developer/drum - 4000 copy yield 1 • $ .024 per copy cost • $52 upgrade memory to 44 pages (the vendor included this benefit at no cost) Panafax UF733 • $2031 - $1906 for fax machine + $125 installation charge • $47 for toner - 4000 copy yield • $293 for developer/drum - 20000 copy yield • $ .0241 per copy cost • $250 upgrade memory from 20 to 50 pages After using these machines, City Staff expressed satisfaction in the Canon L700 as the best quality of the machines and the easiest to use. Therefore, I am recommending the purchase of the Canon L700 plain paper fax machine. It is a laser fax machine with the latest technology in image - resolution. Plus it is smaller in size than the others and has one cartridge that replaces toner, developer and the drum, which makes it easier for ordering and replacing theseqIupplies . 4 //''� Tim Cruikshank, Management Assistant RECOMMENDATION; Waive reading of Resolution No. 4258 authorizing an expenditure not to exceed $2500 from account #100-4190-703 for the purchase of Canon L700 Plain Paper Fax Machine. RESOLUTION NO. 4258 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AUTHORIZATION OF PURCHASE OF PLAIN PAPER FAX MACHINE WHEREAS, the City's existing thereto paper fax machine is 6 years old and has become obsolete making faxed messages difficult to read . - . . d WHEREAS, City staff has evaluated three plain paper fax machines, the Fujitsu dex720, the Canon L700 and the Panafax UF733, and they are all similar in price, features and per copy costs; and WHEREAS, City staff likes the Canon L700 because of its ease of use and superior technology and make. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Mounds View City Council authorize an expenditure not to exceed $2500 from account #100- 4190-703 for the purchase of Canon L700 plain paper fax machine. Adopted this 27th day of July, 1992 . ATTEST: MAYOR (SEAL) CITY ADMINISTRATOR ,17 Agenda Section: 8•C Gums REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-331C STAFF REPORT Report Date: Council Action: 7-23-92 ,1111EW ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE July 27, 1992 ❑ Public Hearings r7 Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Resolution No. 4264 Designating a Portion of the Fund Balance of the General Fund Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. -._61-0"-} Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; As of year end 1991 the undesignated Fund Balance of the General Fund is $168,183. At several budget work sessions possible designations of this amount were discussed. It is my understanding that the following designations were agreed upon: Designated for revenue shortfalls $ 100,000 Designated for litigation $ 30,000 Designated for ensuing years budget $ 38,163 Resolution 4264, A Resolution Designating A Portion of the Fund Balance of the General Fund is attached for your consideration. This resolution authorizes the above referenced designations. Donald Brager, Finance ector RECOMMENDATION; Adoption of Resolution No. 4264, A Resolution Designating a Portion of the Fund Balance of the General Fund. RESOLUTION NO. 4264 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A PORTION OF THE FUND BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND WHEREAS, as of December 31, 1991 undesignated Fund Balance of the General Fund amounts to $168, 183 ; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Mounds View desires to provide for the financial security of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby authorize the following designations of the Fund Balance of the General Fund: Designated for revenue shortfalls $ 100, 000 Designated for litigation $ 30, 000 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Mounds View increases the present designation for ensuing years budget by $38, 163 and authorizes this amount to be used for the 1993 General Fund Budget. Adopted this 27th day of August, 1992 . ATTEST: _ • . (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator Pub//c 13oo,c B,EXLUTJ ON NO, 4259 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WHEREAS, The City Council has reviewed the claims numbers: 35904 through 36012 in the amount of $ 131.478.69 37692 through 37704 in the amount of $ 4.537.85 37708 through in the amount of $ 31.15 38181 through 38200 in the amount of $ 91.641 .12 TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 227.689.01 • and has found said claims to be just and correct; (list of any exception) NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated 07/28/92 by the vote ayes nayes ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator • GE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01 , MOUNDS VIEW ;NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN 1(li ,200 SBURGH, CLAYTON * 35904 07/28/92 07/28/92 56.00 56.0 OUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 AMT- 24.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE COUNT NUMBER- 50-4352-020128 AMT- 32.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 56.00 56.0 '100 SCHMIDT, LARRY * 35905 07/28/92 07/28/92 192.00 192.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 123.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020123 AMT- 48.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020125 AMT- 16.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 192.00 00 19' .{= 500 GETTER, MYRON * 35906 07/28/92 07/28/99 94.O0 96.C: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 96.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE ■ ■ • .7 - c/E, i [5O:3 SEEKON, STEVE * 35907 07/28/92 07/28/92 32.00 32.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 32.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 32.00 32.0 5200 LARSON, ROY * 35908 07/28/92 07/28/92 56.00 56.0 y ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 AMT- 56.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 56.00 56.0 7000 KOLLMANN, DENNIS * 35909 07/28/92 07/28/92 88.00 88.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 88.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 88.00 88.0 700 A.U.M.A. * 35910 07/28/92 07/16/92 8.50 8. . ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-36:3000 AMT- 8.50 DESC-JUNE 11 MEETING VENDOR TOTAL 8.50 8t4 ,103 MAHN, JASON * 35911 07/28/92 07/28/92 240.00 240.0= ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 112.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 AMT- 80.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020123 AMT- 32.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020128 AMT- 16.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 240.00 240.0 5201 PASFK , TED * 35912 07/28/92 07/28/92 184.00 184.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4.352-020119 AMT- 24.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 AMT- 16.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020128 AMT- 144.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 184.00 184.0 7100 RICHSMANN, MARK * 35913 07/28/P2 07/28/92 128.00 128.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 128.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 128.00 128.0 7204 JENSEN, THOMAS * 35914 07/20/9' 07/28/92 40.00 40.E_ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 40.00 DESC-DEP REF-8432 FAIRCHILD AVE 0 AGE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER P-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW ENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHE[ NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOU* VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 40.0 72050NUTTILA, JED * 35915 07/28/92 07/28/92 552.00 552. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020018 AMT- 552.00 DESC-TENNIS INSTRUCTOR VENDOR TOTAL 552.00 552.0 7206 REEVES, LELAND E. * 35916 07/28/92 07/28/92 150.00 150.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 499-4121-705000 AMT- 150.00 DESC-7975 LONG LAKE ROAD-EASEMENT VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 150.0 7207 SlNYKIN, STU * 35917 07/28/92 07/28/92 5.00 5.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351018 AMT- 5.00 DESC-REFUND OF OVERPAYMENT VENDOR TOTAL 5.00 5.0 7208 SPEVAK, RICHARD OR GL* * 35918 07/28/92 07/28/92 39.28 39.2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-3991-000000 AMT- 39.28 DESC-REFUND OF OVERPAYMENT VENDOR TOTAL 39.28 39.2 7209 SUAREZ, HUMBERTO AND * * 35919 07/28/92 07/28/92 150.00 150.O ACCOUNT NUMBER- 499-4121-705000 AMT- 150.00 DESC-5144 LONG LAKE ROAD-EASEMENT VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 150.0 7210 TURF MANAGEMENT DIGES* * 35920 07/28/92 07/28/92 17.95 17.9 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 17.95 DESC-SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL VENDOR TOTAL 17.95 17.9 721 A/C * 3592107/28/92 07/28/92 25.00 25.0 11,0UNT NUMBER- 100-3230-000000 AMT- 25.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 25.0 r212 JOHNSON, KRISTY * 35922 07/28/92 07/28/92 12.50 12.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351042 AMT_ 12.50 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 12.50 12.t ;311 MALIFOWSKI, ROD * 35923 07/28/92 07/28/92 64.00 64.O ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 64.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 64.0 ;316-TO8IASON, NEIL * 35924-07/28/92 07y28/92 240.00 240.T�� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 240.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 240.00 240.0 ;321 LADWIG, LOREN * 35925 07/28/92 07/28/92 128.00 128.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 128.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 128.00 128.0 151 INTN'L CONF OF BLDG 0* * 35926 07/28/92 C48425 06/30/92 22.00 22.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-210000 AMT- 22.00 DESC-'91 UBC-APP/INTERPRETATION VENDOR TOTAL 22.00 22.0 0 GE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW :NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN ;201 rITTELSTADT, DON * 35927 07/28/92 • 07/28/92 64.00 64.0 OUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 AMT- 64.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 64.0 ;202 MAHN, WILLIAM * 35928 07/28/92 07/28/92 64.00 64.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT 44.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 44.00 64.0_ :166 BECK, WILLIAM * 35929 07/28/92 07/28/92 405.00 405.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020018 AMT- 405.00 DESC-IRONDALE YTH FOOTBLL CMP COACH VENDOR TOTAL 405.00 405.0 :220 MILLER, MIKE * 35930 07/28/92 07/28/92 384.00 384.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 AMT- 80.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020123 AMT- 112.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020125 AMT- 32.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 384.00 384.0 1050 AEC - ENGINEERS & DES* * 35931 07/28/92 5228 07/10/92 345.93 345.:' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 680-4120-203000 AMT- 345.93 DESC-CONSTRUCTION INSP 500 MG EWT VENDOR TOTAL 345.93 345.9 ::185 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY* * 35932 07/28/92 M12130717 07/17/92 81 .35 81.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-355000 AMT- 81.35 DESC TOWELS, RAGS, AND MATS VENDOR TOTAL 81.35 81.1 124ERICAN OFFICE PRODU* * 35933 07/28/92 254938 05/29/92 310.00 310.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-703000 AMT- 310.00 DESC-RECYCLING COLLECTORS • 35933 92 254581 05/29/92 '75.00 375.( ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-703000 AMT- 375.00 DESC-36 X 72 OVAL CONFERENCE TABLE * 35933 07/28/92 256290 07/10/92 14.98 14.. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 14.98 DESC-IBM LIFT OFF * 3.5933 07/28/92 255154 07/10/92 29.45 :'.9. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 29.45 DESC-FOLDERS * 35933 07/28/92 255872 07/10/92 36.08 36.( ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 36.08 DESC-GREEN FOLDERS * 35933 07/28j 92 256227 07j10j72 11:.6:8 118. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 118.68 DESC-CLASSIFICATION FOLDERS VENDOR TOTAL es4.19 884. 950 APPLE BUSINESS FORMS * 359:34 07/28/92 3949 07/02/92 952.91 952.. ACCOUNT NUMBER 100-4150-343000 AMT- 952.91 DESC-RECEIPTS VENDOR TOTAL 952.91 411 BACON ELECTRIC * 35935 07/28/92 0018413-IN 06/30/92 1817.08 1817.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-513000 AMT- 1817.08 DESC-REPAIR CIVIL DEFENSE SIREN * 35935. 07/28/92 0018417-IN 06/30/92 497.34 497.: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 697-4121-511000 AMT- 497.34 DESC-RECEPTACLES/LIGHTS-FRONT DESK VENDOR TOTAL 2314.42 2314.- GE 4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK� CH �CK CnECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN 50RBAROSSA & SONS * 35936 07/28/92 8964 07/13/92 14506.50 14506.5 NUMBER- 730-4121-515000 AMT- 14506.50 DESC-MATERIALS AND LABOR # VENDOR TOTAL 14506.50 14506.5 '005 BEISSWENGER'S * 35937 07/28/92 828 07/17/92 23.32 23.3 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 23.32 DESC-BLADE BRUSHES . * 35937 07/28/92 47A 07/06/92 2.77 2.7 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 2.77 DESC-KEYS * 35937 07/28/92 171A 07/02/92 3.20 3.2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 3.20 DESC-BOLTS & NUTS * 35937 07/28/92 34A 06/17/92 1.68 1.6 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 1.68 DESC-FACET - . . . = � ' a �a �o .z a ` °� ' .� - ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 1.51 DESC-PLUMBING PARTS VENDOR TOTAL 32.48 32.4 ;080 BIFFS, INC * 35938 07 .28/92 . 06/30/92 678.38 678.3 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-356000 AMT- 678.38 DESC-PORTABLES-JULY VENDOR TOTAL 678.38 478.3 R148120 07/13/92 52.77 52.782 BOYER TRUCK PARTS * 35939 07/28/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-122000 AMT- 52.77 DESC-CONTROL * 35939 07/28/92 148463 07/14/92 126.55 126.5. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-122000 AMT- 126.55 DESC-ADJUSTER & CHAMBER VENDOR TOTAL 179.32 179. : 1IkEDEMUS HARDWARE CO.* * 35940 07/28/92 58743 07/08/92 183.77 183.7 DESC-PARTS-GROVELAND PARK ACCOUNT NUMBER- 1O0-436O-16O000 AMT- 183.77 VENDOR TOTAL 183.77 183.7 ,888 BRIGHTON EXCAVATING C* * 35941 07/28/92 07/08/92 12.67 12.t ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-124000 AMT- 12.67 DESC-SALES TAX/3-8 YDS LDS PUL DIRT VENDOR TOTAL 12.67 12.6 7000 BRIGHTON VETERINARY H* * 35942 07/28/92 07/28/92 165.00 165.O ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-303000 AMT- 165.00 DESC-JUNE VET. SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 165.00 165.( �000 CELLULAR ONE * 35943 07/2 /92 040450 06/29/92 101.18 101'1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-703000 AMT- 101.18 DESC-CORD & EXTERNAL ANTENNA * 35943 07/28/92 041171 06/30/92 15.98 15.9 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-703000 AMT- 15.98 DESC-HANG-UP CUP VENDOR TOTAL 117.16 117.1 3127 CHIPPEWA SPRINGS CORP* * 35944 07/28/92 06/30/92 2 29 =9,50 .^ ACCOUNT � ER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 29.50 DESC-WATER COOLER RENTAL � VENDOR TOTAL 29.50 29.5 3300 CITY WIDE LOCKSMITHIN* 35945 07/28/92 98746 07/16/92 6.75 4.7 • I GE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECF NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNilli OUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-121000 AMT- 6.75 DESC-KEYS VENDOR TOTAL 6.75 6.7 000 CLIMB THEATRE 35946 07/28/92 P1067 07/10/92 435.00 435.0; ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160028 AMT- 435.00 DESC-"ELVES & THE SHOEMAKER"-7/10 VENDOR TOTAL 435.00 435.0' 000 COAST TO COAST * 35947 07/28/92 006823 07/16/92 7.43 7.4:. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-123000 AMT- 7.43 DESC-MASKING TAPE * 35947 07/28/92 006869 07/08/92 - 6.05 6.0` ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 6.05 DESC-HOOKS & RINGS * 35947 07/28/9 006371 07/08/92 7.47 7.4 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 7.47 DESC-3 - PAINT * 35947 07/28/92 006863 07/07/Q2 10.20 10.2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 10.20 DESC-DRILL BITS * 35947 07/28/92 006906 07/13/92 13.83 1.3.8 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 13.83 DESC-RAKE * 35947 07/28/92 006920 06/30/92 75.06 75.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-123000 AMT- 75.06 DESC-HOSES & NOZZLE * 35947 07/28/92 006187 07/10/92 5.74 5.7 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 5.74 DESC-PLUNGER * 35947 07/28/92 006864 07/07/92 2.77 2.T ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 2.77 DESC-SCREWS * 35947 07/23/92 006176 04/10/92 6.38 6. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-140000 AMT- 6.38 tiESC-DOOR HANDLES * 35947 07/28/92 006959 07/07/92 68.11 68.1 lippUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 68.11 DESC-"WEED B GON" VENDOR TOTAL 203.04 20_,,0: 320 COMMISSIONER OF TRANS* * 35949 07/22/92 07/09/92 5.00 5.0. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-210000 AMT- 5.00 DESC-STATE AID MANUAL VENDOR TOTAL 5.00 5.0 175 CONTRACT CLEANING SPE* * 35950 07/28/92 07/02/92 7588.28 758.2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-351000 AMT- 701.84 DESC-JULY SERVICE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-121000 AMT- 56.44 DESC-MEDIUM AND SMALL BAGS VENDOR TOTAL 758.28 758.2 '91 C8--OP FARM--SERVICE x 3591-1-07/20/92--29-1 70 06/02/92 t1.21 1-1..2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 11.21 DESC-SALES TAX/ROUNDUP VENDOR TOTAL 11.21 11.2 )25 COTTENS INC * :35952 07/28/92 103427 07/16/92 10.88 10.S ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 10.88 DESC-V-BELT * 35952 07/28/92 102757 07/09/92 3.82 3.2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-123000 AMT- 3.82 DESC-OIL FILTER - VENDOR TOTAL 14.70 14.7 +'5i'53 C 50 DCA, INC. * .;.�-�:�o 07/28/92 ..,04311 06/30/92 116.85 116.G ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-303000 AMT- 116.85 DESC-FLEX ADMIN FEE-JUNE ^ [GE 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUD VENDOR TOTAL 116.85 116.E 650 C � 'S AUTO. SERVICE * * 35954 07/28/92 5537 05/20/02 450.00 . ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-160000 AMT- 650.00 DESC-OTC 4000 E(W/TRADE) VENDOR TOTAL 650.00 650.0 1660 DATASOURCE-CONNECTING* * 35955 07/28/92 50667 07/08/92 2386.00 2386.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-703000 AMT- 2386.00 DESC-NBWARESYSTEM * 35955 07/28/92 50715 07/10/92 404.75 404.7 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-703000 AMT- 404.75 DESC-TRIPPLITE _ VENDOR TOTAL 2790.75 2790.' � �100 EPA AUDIO VISUAL,INC. * 35956 07/28/92 00073266 07/17/92 42.67 42.6 A mm ' 'm : - - '_^ � - J. ^' ^ - , m. '' - ` - �- ^ ilk m. * 35956 07/28/92 00073330 07/17/92 320.37 320.3 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-160000 AMT- 320.37 DESC-VHS TAPES AND HANGER * 35956 07/28/92 04/17/92 74.43- 74.4 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-160000 AMT- 74.43- DESC-CREDIT VENDOR TOTAL 288.61 288.6 )300 EAST BETHEL LANDFILL * 35957 07/28/92 07/09/92 80.00 80.O ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-121000 AMT- 80.00 DESC-DUMPING FEE VENDOR TOTAL 80.00 80.O )400 EGAN OIL COMPANY * 35958 07/28/92 15530 07/07/92 250.20 250.: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-170000 AMT- 250.20 DESC-55 GAL.- PEGASUS 80 VENDOR TOTAL 250.20 250.2 • )440 EGAN & SONS CO. * 35959 07/28/92 15179 06/30/92 436.00 436.{ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 480-4120-702000 AMT- 436.00 DESC-SLOP SINK VENDOR TOTAL 436.00 436.{ 2000 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFT* * 35960 07/28/92 91389801 06/18/92 62.82 62.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-703000 AMT- 62.82 DESC-BITSTREAM FACELIFT 1.5 VENDOR TOTAL 62.82 62.E � :1075552075 EVERGREEN LAND SERVIC* * 35961 07/28/92 3147 07/02/92 552.50 .` � COUNT NUMBER- 499-4121-303000 AMT- 552.50 DESC-CONSULTANT'S FEE VENDOR TOTAL 552:50 552.! /925 FEDORS MARKET * 35962 07/28/92 07/01/92 30.52 30.� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 30.52 DESC-#6377 & #7583/MISC GROCERIES * 35962 07/28/92 07/01/92 61 .85 61.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 61.85 DESC-#4769, 5079, 0574, & 4240(MISC * 35942 07/28/92 07/01/92 228.17 228.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160130 AMT- 158.91 DESC-#4719, 3470, & 3440 (MISC) ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160003 AMT- 4.76 DESC-#8394 (MISC) ACCOUNT NUMBER-NUMBER- 255-4121-160000 AMT- 54.40 DESC-#1711 (MISC) ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 8.10 DESC-#6004 (MISC) VENDOR TOTAL 320.54 320.� ������ "AGE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER o -C1O-01 MOUNDS VIEW ENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUIN ::90( IENDLY CHEVROLET * 35963 07/28/92 178744 07/11/92 13.30 13.� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 13.3O DESC-FILTER * 35963 07/28/92 12616 07/14/92 4.07 4.{ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100_4260-122000 AMT- 4.07 DESC-SWITCH VENDOR TOTAL 17.37 17.� )040 8 E CAPITAL CORPORATI* * 35964 07/28y92 11368154 07/05/92 50.48 50.4 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-401000 AMT- 50.48 DESC-MITA COPIER INSTALLMENT-AUGUST VENDOR TOTAL 50.48 50.4 .500 GARMENT GRAPHICS * 35965 07y28/92 103239 07/01/92 262.00 262.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-240000 AMT- 52.40 DESC-ORANGE T-SHIRTS/PT MAINTENANCE ti, m L wi °'- t -'-, t -r'is - =7, ^ I -m.A^ ` -r- '' u^ . ^. - ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-240000 AMT- 52.40 DESC-ORANGE T-SHIRTS/PT MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-240000 AMT- 52.40 DESC-ORANGE T-SHIRTS/PT MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-240000 AMT- 52.40 DESC-ORANGE T-SHIRTS/PT MAINTENANCE VENDOR TOTAL 262.00 262.0 f1O0 GENERATOR SPECIALTY C* * 35966 07/28/92 4163 06/30/92 63.78 63.7 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-512000 AMT- 63.78 DESC-STARTER REPAIR KIT & LABOR VENDOR TOTAL 63.78 63.7 :155 OESTBNER CORPORATION * 35967 07/28/92 203624 07/16/92 100.00 100.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-511000 AMT- 100.00 DESC-SERVICE LABOR STENCIL DUPL VENDOR TOTAL 100.00 100.( AlN,PHER BEARING COMPAN* * 35968 07/28/92 111880620 07/07/92 35.36 35.: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-121000 AMT- 35.36 DESC-BRG INSERTS, HOUSINGS, & BELTS VENDOR TOTAL 35.36 35. E80 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL* * 35969 07/28/92 2060413 06/3 //92 122.50 122.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-303000 AMT- 122.50 DESC-JUNE SERVICE CHARGE VENDOR TOTAL 122.50 122. 700 JIM HATCH SALES COMPA* * 35970 07/28/92 1412 05/15/92 238.46 238.L ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 238.46 DESC-SHOVELS & RAKES VENDOR TOTAL 238.46 238.i ' ' ' i uAk , 1~'1: m.' . - - -? ,s ' ~ , ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-303000 AMT- 77.00 DESC-ANALYSES VENDOR TOTAL 77.00 77.( 535 INSTY-PRINTS * 35972 07/28y92 17359 07/01/92 52.73 52.- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160030 AMT- 27.30 DESC-FLYERS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160034 AMT- 6.36 DESC-FLYERS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160038 AMT- 6,36 DESC-FLYERS ' ACCOUNT NUMBER- ' 250-4351-160026 AMT- 6.36 DESC-FLYERS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160033 AMT- 6.35 DESC-FLYERS * 35972 07/28/92 17459 07y17/92 105.48 105.L • BE 8 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW :NDOR CHECK CHECK. INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN tiOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-160213 AMT- 105.48 DESC-FLYERS VENDOR TOTAL 158.21 158.2 1800 JORGENSEN STEEL & ALU* * 35973 07/28/92 286477 07/13/92 130.36 130.2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 130.36 DESC-BAR-1/4 X 10 X 12' R/L VENDOR TOTAL 130.36 130. 000 KELLER ELECTRIC INC * 35974 07/28/92 019188 07/08/92 250.00 250.0; ACCOUNT NUMBER- 697-4121-511000 AMT- 250.00 DESC-RELOCATING 5 LITE SWITCHES VENDOR TOTAL 250.00 i50.0 ;470 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDI* * 35975 07/28/92 0220-012344 07/02/92 18.09 18.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-160000 AMT- 18.09 DESC-4' WOOD STEP LADDER ■ I A '-1 _ C. )216 L.M.C.I.T. * 35976 07/28/92 307903 06/23/92 171.00 171.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-480000 AMT- 171.00 DESC-SPECIAL MULTI-PERIL ENDORSEMNT VENDOR TOTAL 171.00 171.0 )300 M R P A * 35977 07/28/92 52-0713 07/07/92 2000.00 2000.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4:352-160119 AMT- 1300.00 DESC-STATE TOURNAMENT ENTRIES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160120 AMT- 200.00 DESC-STATE TOURNAMENT ENTRIES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160123 AMT- 200.00 DESC-STATE TOURNAMENT ENTRIES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160125 AMT- 300.00 DESC-STATE TOURNAMENT ENTRIES VENDOR TOTAL 2000.00 2000.0 j.J�j �� DSEN-JOHNSON CORPOR* * 35978 07/28/92 07/16/92 20908.55 209008. OUNT NUMBER- 680-4120-705000 AMT- 20908.55 DESC-WTP #1 - PAYMENT #9 VENDOR TOTAL 20908.55 20908.t )640 MAR-GA SIMPLE CONCEPT* * . 35979 07/28/92 1954 . 07/13/92 78.45 78.t ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 78.45 DESC-SAND COMB VENDOR TOTAL 78.45 78.4 )760 MATCO TOOLS * 35980 07/28/92 1204 07/02/92 65.21 65.2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 65.21 DESC-MITYVAC & FENDER COVER VENDOR TOTAL 65.21 65.: 2075 MENARDS * 35981 07/28/92 19681 07/01/92 371.34 1.: 4 371.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-160213 AMT- 371.34 DESC-SET BUILDING SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL 371.34 371. - r. 35982 07/28/92J 1 *2�.8o: 07/01/92 _ a783• 2170 METRO WASTE CONTROL C* * �, �-a2 47•.=:7.t3CT +tr.....•7.C' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-323000 AMT- 47837.00 DESC-AUGUST SEWER SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 47837.00 47837.0 3442 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPO* * 35983 07/28x"92 20865 07/10/92 405.29 405.: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-124000 AMT- 405.29 DESC-PATCHING SUPPLIES * x, .,5983 7 - �9� 2"3798 07/02 t92 233.10 .23• .1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-121000 AMT- 23.10 DESC-MATERIALS 1GE 9 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW =NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMCUN 41VENDOR TOTAL 428.39 428.3 34481°fIDWEST SPECIALTY SAL* * :35984 07/'28/9 1499 07/08/92 539.04 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-123000 AMT- 539.06 DESC-BLADES * 35984 07/28/92 1498 07/08/92' 17.65 17.6 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-123000 AMT- 17.65 DESC-PIVOT PIN - PUSH ARM * 35984 07/28/92 1512 07/08/92' 68.33 68.2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-123000 AMT- 68.33 DESC-2 - AIR CLEANER ELEMENTS * 35984 07/28/92 1529 07/08/92 37.91 37.9 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4:360-123000 AMT- 37.91 DESC-2 - V-BELTS VENDOR TOTAL 662.95 66:7).9 '_050 NELSON'S OFFICE SUPPL* * 35985 07/28/92 NT542712 07/16/92 8.33 8.3. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-160000 AMT- 8.33 DESC-MISC SUPPLIES VENDOR T 8.33 8.3. 220 NEW BRIGHTON PARKS/RE* * 35986 07/28/92 07/06/92 131.95 131.9 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4:351-16000:3 AMT- 131.95 DESC-29 BASKETBALL CLINIC T-SHIRTS VENDOR TOTAL 131.95 1:31.9 ;690 NORTH STAR TURF, INC * 35987 07/28/92 469020 07/08/92 357.84 357.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 357.84 DESC-ATHLETIC PRO II MIX-50# VENDOR TOTAL 357.84 357.8 V200 NORTHERN STATES POWER* * 35988 07/28/92 07/28/92 4807.02 4807. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-321000 AMT- 1009.82 DESC-2401 HWY 10-CITY HALL 11,OUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-325000 AMT- 102.48 DESC-9399 HWY 10 & CO RD H2-SIGNAL OUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-325000 AMT- 8.67 DESC-2800 HWY 10 & SILVER LAKE ROAD ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 40.96 DESC-7901 GREENWOOD DR ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 3.65 DESC-5324 JACKSON DRIVE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-321000 AMT- 47.79 DESC-8251 GROVELAND RD-STATION #2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-321000 AMT- 5.32 DESC-1755 CO RD I W-SIREN #1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- 17.89 DESC-2524 BRONSON DR-WELL #2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-322000 AMT- 448.95 DESC-2524 BRONSON DR-WELL #2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- 181.55 DESC-2408 HILLVIEW RD WELL #4 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- 793.60 DESC-5100 LONG LAKE WELL #5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- 2146.34 DESC-7545 GROVELAND ROAD VENDOR TOTAL 4807.02 4807.0 200 ODIN COMPANY * 35990 07/28/92 1201 06/28/92 665.00 645.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-303000 AMT- 665.00 DESC-NETWARE CONSULTING VENDOR TOTAL 665.00 665.0 1580 PAPER PRODUCTS PLUS * 35991 07/28/92 18630 07/07/92 9.96 9. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 9.96 DESC-CUPS, PLATES, & TABLECOVER VENDOR TOTAL 9.96 9.'- 200 PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY * 35992 07/28/92 1635492 07/10/92 128.91 128.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-170000 AMT- 33.64 DESC-FUEL USAGE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-170000 AMT- 61.28 DESC-FUEL USAGE • GE 10 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER ='-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW =NDOO, CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUI`ii• -- CCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-170000 AMT- 33.99 DESC-FUEL USAGE VENDOR TOTAL 123.91 128.9 3900 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIP* * 35993 07/28/92 0002799-IN 07/09/92 16.72 16.7 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-125000 AMT- 16.72 DESC-4" FULL FACED COMP GASKET VENDOR TOTAL 16.72 16.7 94 07/28/92225121 07/08/92 5.63 5.6 5900 POLAR CHEVROLET & MAZ* * 35'� �' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 5.63 DESC-BOLT-TOR VENDOR TOTAL 5.43 5.6 5940 PONY EXPRESS RELOADER* *• 35995 07/28/92 07/01/92 50.48 50.4 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-363000 AMT- 50.48 DESC-4 BXS-40 S&W,JHP RELOADED AMMO II. r _ "0 4::' 50.4 5960 POSTAGE BY PHONE SYST* * 35996 07/28/92 07/28/92 2000.00 2000.0__ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-:330000 AMT- 2000.00 DESC-POSTAGE MACHINE VENDOR TOTAL 2000.00 2000.0 1,875 PRINTMASTER * 35997 07/28/92 18373 06/29/92 1304.83 1304.=' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-343000 AMT- 1:304.83 DESC-1992 ADOPTED BUDGET BOOKS VENDOR TOTAL 1304.83 1304.E 0400 SAARION, MARY * 35998 07/28/92 07/28/92 19.47 19.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-380000 AMT- 3.78 DESC-MILEAGE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-390000 AMT- 15.49 DESC-MEETING iVENDOR TOTAL 19.47 19.L 2793 MINN, STATE OF * 35999 07/28/92 157250 07/28/92 30.00 30.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-121000 AMT- 30.00 DESC-CERTIFICATE-EXEMPTION FEE * 35999 07/28/92 157244 07/28/92 10.00 10.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-121000 AMT- 10.00 DESC-CERTIFICATE-EXEMPTION FEE * 35999 07/28/92 .157245 07/28/92 10.00 10.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-121000 AMT- 10.00 DESC-CERTIFICATE-EXEMPTION FEE VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 50.0 3225 SHORT ELLIOTT & HENDR* * 34000 07/28/92 1:3775 05/28/92 1571.53 1571 ..`_ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 420-4121-303000 AMT- 1571.53 DESC-MISC WATER RESOURCES SERVICES VENDOR TOTAL 1571.53 1571.t 5605 SNYDERS DRUG STORES * 36001 07/28/92 0:36959 07/20/92 5.97 5.'` ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-16002.9 AMT- 5.97 DESC-RIT DYE -- * •36001 07/28/92 086954 07/17/92 22.43 ��. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160030 AMT- 11.21 DESC-FILM DEVELOPING ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160034 AMT- 11.22 DESC-FILM DEVELOPING * 36001 07/28/92 086954 07/15/92 4.09 4.{. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-140000 AMT- 4.09 DESC-FILM * 36001 07/28/92 086573 07/08/92 17.45 17.6 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-140024 AMT- 3.5:3 DESC-PHOT DEVELOPMENT & SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4:351-160030 AMT- 3.53 DESC-PHOT DEVELOPMENT & SUPPLIES • .GE 11 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW :NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN libOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160033 AMT- 3.53 DESC-PHOT DEVELOPMENT & SUPPLIES UNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160034 AMT- 3.53 DESC-PHOT DEVELOPMENT & SUPPLIES A COUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160038 AMT- 3.53 DESC-PHOT DEVELOPMENT & SUPPLIES * 36001 07/28/92 086574 07/08/92 1.3.45 13.4 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160029 AMT- 13.45 DESC-GENERAL MERCHANDISE * 36001 07/28/92 086940 07/20/92 42.58 42.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-160000 AMT- 42.58 DESC-SPECTRA FILM * 36001 07/28/9.2 086958 07/20/92 24.52 24.5. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-1600:34 AMT- 17.34 DESC-FILM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160038 AMT- 7.18 DESC-FILM & RUBBER CEMENT * 36001 07/28/9 086540 07/28/92 14.37 14.3 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 14.37 DESC-CAMERA BATTERIES * 36001 07/28/92 086961 07/21/92 5.72 5.7 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-140030 AMT- 5.72 DESC-FILM VENDOR TOTAL 150.78 150.7 200 CITY OF SPRING LAKE P* * 36003 07/28/92 542 07/13/92 84.67 84.6. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160028 AMT- 84.67 DESC-LAKESIDE BEACH WATER CARNIVAL VENDOR TOTAL 84.67 :34.1 '250 SPRING LAKE PARK FIRE* * 36004 07/28/92 07/10/92 13266.70 133246.7 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4210-390000 AMT- 13246.70 DESC-DECEMBER FIRE PROTECTION VENDOR TOTAL 13246.70 13266. .000 SUBURBAN PROPANE * 36005 07/28/92 550886 07/15/92 61.37 61._ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 61.37 DESC-AUTO SHUTOFF IVENDOR TOTAL 61.37 61.1 '650 SYSTEMS SUPPLY INC. * 36006 07/28/92 070411 07/14/92 114.15 114.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-160000 AMT- 114. 15 DESC-2PT NCR PAPER • 36006 07/28/92 CM9803 07/06/92 27.20- 27.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 27.20- DESC-RETURN 40 DISKETTES VENDOR TOTAL 86.95 84.'c- 100 THE MINNESOTA DAILY * 36007 07/28/92 327026 07/08/92 27.08 27.( ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160011 AMT- 27.08 DESC-ADS VENDOR TOTAL 27.08 27.C. Y 8- 28/ n 28 r2 22:3-23 22s ; 400-�-s-WEST �t,��r��_, c�7r:::,/7� �t:._,r�� r��,_.�_ r:.�,_. ACCOUNT NIIMBFR- t00-4190-710OOti AMT- .7'9.11.2 i1FSC-F2:1-41.2, ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-310000 AMT- 180.60 DESC-E07-15 ;0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-310000 AMT- 52.12 DESC-484-9155 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4340-310000 AMT- 16.12 DESC-780-1908 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-310000 AMT- 14.12 DESC-784-1076 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-310000 AMT- 14.12 DESC-784-0470 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-210000 AMT- 16.12 DESC-784-1305 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-310000 AMT- 38.93 DESC-784-9871 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-310000 AMT- 193.16 DESC-784-9926 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-310000 AMT- 4:3.51 DESC-784-941.2 . ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-310000 AMT- 625.81 DESC-784-3055 IP a. GE 12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10701 MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN • VENDOR TOTAL 1228.23 1228.2 000 UNITOG RENTALS SYSTEM * 36010 07/28/92 2832740706 07/06/92 99.59 99.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-240000 AMT- 99.59 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL * 36010 07/28/99 2832740713 07/13/92 97.44 97.4 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-240000 AMT- 97.44 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL VENDOR TOTAL 197.03 19.7.0 000 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CEN* * 36011 07/28/92 H441098H-H 07/13/92 41.53 41.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 41.53 DESC-EAR MUFFS & GREY LENS VENDOR TOTAL 41 .53 41.5: 000 ZEP MANUFACTURING COM* * 366012 07/28/92 57397037 07/07/92 251.12 251.1. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-160000 AMT- T0.23 DESC-CLEANING SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 50.23 DESC-CLEANING SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 50.22. DESC-CLEANING SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 50.22 DESC-CLEANING SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 50.22 DESC-CLEANING SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL 251.12 251.1 GRAND TOTAL 131478.69 131478.6 • • 'GE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER '-C10-02 MOUNDS VIEW .NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN '203 IN, JANET 37692 07/15/92 07/15/92 500.00 500.0 OUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-020213 AMT- 500.00 DESC-CHOREOGRAPHER VENDOR TOTAL 500.00 500.0 ,211 MCINTYRE, ROBIN 37693 07/15/92 07/15/92 1000.00 1000.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-02021:3 AMT- 1000.00 DESC-SET DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION/LIGHTS VENDOR TOTAL 1000.00 1000.0 '202 K:ARSTAD, REBECCA 37694 07/15/92 07/15/92 500.00 500.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-020213 AMT- 500.00 DESC-COSTUMER VENDOR TOTAL 500.00 500.0 225 TOMCZYK, CURT 37695 07/15/92 07/15/92 250.00 250.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-020.213 AMT- 250,00 DFSC-STAGF MANAGER VENDOR TOTAL 250.00 250.0 201 LANE, MICHAEL 37696 07/15/92 07/15/92 1000.00 1000.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-020213 AMT- 1000.00 DESC-ARTISTIC DIRECTOR VENDOR TOTAL 1000.00 1000.0 750 ULRICH, MICHAEL 37698 07/16/92 07/14/92 100.00 100.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-363000 AMT- 100.00 DESC-EXPENSE ADVANCE VENDOR TOTAL 100.00 100.0 135 MERMAID BOWLING LANES 37699 07/17/92 07/17/92 182.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160028 AMT- 182.50 DESC-73 CHILDREN BOWLING-7/17 . VENDOR TOTAL 182.50 182.E 040 CRUIKSHANK, TIMOTHY 37700 07/17/92 07/17/92 35.40 35.4 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-343000 AMT- 20.00 DESC-MAUMA MEETING ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-380000 AMT- 15.40 DESC-MILEAGE VENDOR TOTAL 35.40 35.4 500 MINETOR, RIC 37701 07/17/92 07/17/92 19.12 19.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-160000 AMT- 19.12 DESC-COMPUTER CABLE VENDOR TOTAL 17.12 19.1 200 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REV* 37702 07/17/92 07/17/92 865.31 865.:= ACCOUNT-NUMBER- 700=3821-000000 AMT- 744.17 DESC=2ND UTR-SALES-TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-3821-000000 AMT- _20 DFSC-2ND QTR SALFS TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-3371-000000 AMT- 10.44 DESC-2ND QTR USE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-112000 AMT 35.48 DESC-2ND QTR USE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 2.27 DESC-2ND QTR USE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-330000 AMT- 12.04 DESC-2ND QTR USE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-401000 AMT- 3.09 DESC-2ND QTR USE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 AMT- 8.32 DESC-2ND QTR USE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-703000 AMT- 34.03 DESC-2ND QTR USE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-240000 AMT- 5.85 DESC-2ND QTR USE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-122000 AMT- .79 DESC-2ND QTR USE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-240000 AMT- 4.51 DESC-2ND QTR USE TAX S GE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER -C10r02 . MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUIN VENDOR TOTAL 65.31 865.: 965�~PROEX PHOTO SYSTEM 37703 07/20/92 07/20/92 62.62 62.t ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160030 AMT- 39.14 DESC-REPRINTS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160038 AMT- 23.48 DESC-REPRINTS VENDOR TOTAL 62.62 62.6 606 ROAD RUNNER 37704 07/20/92 07/20/92 22.90 22.9 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4160-303000 AMT- 22.90 DESC-COURIER SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 22.90 22.c 000 DOMINO'S PIZZA 37708 07/21/92 07/21/92 31.15 31.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-160000 AMT- 31.15 DESC-COUNCIL BUDGET MEETING VENDOR TOTAL 31.15 31.1 210 MN WASTEWATER OPERATO* 38181 07/08/92 07/08/92 95.00 95.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-363000 AMT- 95.00 DESC-MN WASTEWATER OPER CONF-ULRICH VENDOR TOTAL 95.00 . 95.( 965 PROEX PHOTO SYSTEM 38182 07/08/92 07/08/92 37.57 37.1: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160030 AMT- 37.57 DESC-REPRINTS VENDOR TOTAL 37.57 37. 994 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAF* 38183 07/09/92 07/09/92 12.60 12.( ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-122000 AMT- 4.20 DESC-CERTIFIED INSP. PROGRAM DECALS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 8.40 DESC-CERTIFIED INSP. PROGRAM DECALS • VENDOR TOTAL 12.60 12.f 636 FIRSTAR NEW BRIGHTON * 38184 07/09/92 07/09/92 71007.87 71007.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-010000 AMT- 1400.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-010000 AMT- 3476.00 DESC-GROSS - 7y10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-020000 AMT- 640.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-010000 AMT- 1643. 17 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-010000 AMT- 3880.47 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-010000 AMT- 2478.98 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-010000 AMT- 811.48 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-020000 AMT- 684.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 __ACCOUNT NUMBE 1O0O0 AMT- 22524.61 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-011000 AMT- 197.62 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-020000 AMT- 726.39 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-010000 AMT- 477.52 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-020000 AMT- 410.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-010000 AMT- 1141.60 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-011000 AMT- 32.11 DESC-GROSS - 7y10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-010000 AMT- 2945. 17 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-011000 AMT- 209.85 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-010000 AMT- 3241. 16 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNTNUMBER- 100-4360-010000 AMT- 2126.48 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-011000 AMT- 518.69 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-020000 AMT- 942.50 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 • AGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER '-C10-02 MOUNDS VIEW ENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN 418 OUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-02000:3 AMT- 846.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 UNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020026 AMT- 40.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 A COUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020029 AMT- 1799.99 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020040 AMT- 520.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020042 AMT- 306.53 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020260 AMT- 279.26 . DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 256.75 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020260 AMT- 279.26 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-020260 AMT- 279.26 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020229 AMT- 161.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020231 AMT- 77.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020233 AMT- 306.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4254-020237 AMT- 154.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4254-020238 AMT- 28.00 DESC-GROS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020241( AMT- 12.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-0201 J3 AMT- 231.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4254-020255 AMT- 173.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020256 AMT- 112.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020260 AMT- 279.26 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-020000 AMT- 1459.75 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-020000 AMT- 537.66 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-010000 AMT- 480.00 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-010000 AMT- 2493.29 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-010000 AMT- 2260.80 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-011000 AMT- 52.56 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ` ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-020000 AMT- 760.45 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ,OUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-010000 AMT- 2479.01 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 OUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-010000 AMT- 2260.80 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-011000 AMT 844.24 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-020000 AMT- 731.20 DESC-GROSS - 7/10/92 38185 07/10/92 07/10/92 35525.00 3525.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-030000 AMT- 34.10 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-030000 AMT- 255.20 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-030000 AMT- 100.6:3 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-030000 AMT- 218.58 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100_4180-030000 AMT- 147.09 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-030000 AMT- 92.72 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-030000 AMT- 113.49 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-0:30000 AMT- 2.5.42 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-030000 AMT- 70,49 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-030000 AMT- 185.25 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-030000 AMT- 184.47 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4.360-030000 AMT- 213.20 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-030000 AMT- 235.08 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-0:30000 AMT- 33.23 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-030000 AMT- 17.32 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-030000 AMT- 95.07 DESC-7/10/92 - .FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-030000 AMT- 90.49 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-0:X0000 AMT- 33.33 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-030000 AMT- 29.76 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA 0 AGE 4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER '-C10-02 MOUNDS VIEW ENDOR CHECK CHECK: INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN COUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-030000 AMT- 115.20 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA OUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-030000 AMT- 178.69 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA COUNT NUMBER- 730-41.20-030000 AMT- 114.37 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-030000 AMT- 230.70 DESC-7/10/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-031000 AMT- 16.32 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-031000 AMT- 59.68 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-031000 AMT- 23.54 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-031000 AMT- 51 .12 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-031000 AMT- 34.39 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-031000 AMT- 21.69 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-031000 AMT- 71.21 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-031000 AMT- 5.95 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-03.1000 AMT- 16.49 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE : J '1 - . - .., a ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-031000 AMT- 43.14 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-031000 AMT-. 49.87 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-031000 AMT- 55.00 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-031000 AMT- 7.77 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-031000 AMT- 4.05 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-021000 AMT 22.23 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-031000 AMT- 21.16 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-031000 AMT- 7.79 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-031000 AMT- 6.96 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-031000 AMT- 26.95 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-031000 AMT- 41.79 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-031000 AMT- 26.73 DESC-7/10/92 •- MEDICARE 411FOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-0:31000 AMT- 53.96 DESC-7/10/92 - MEDICARE VENDOR TOTAL 74532.87 74532.,_ '900 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 38186 07/10/92 07/10/92 4355.69 4355.x_ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-033000 AMT- 155.73 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-033000 AMT- 73.61 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-033000 AMT- 173.80 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-03.3000 AMT- 111.04 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-033000 AMT- 36.35 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-033000 AMT- 82.00 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-034000 AMT- 2562.64 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-034000 AMT 57.30 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-033000 AMT- 18.37 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-033000 AMT- 5:.56 DCCC PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-033000 AMT- 139.19 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-033000 AMT- 141.41 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-033000 AMT- 115.01 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-033000 AMT- 12.51 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4=52-033000 AMT- 12.51 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-033000 AMT- 12.51 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-033000 AMT- 12.51 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 -_ _--ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-033000 AMT- 18.44 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-0=3000 AMT- 21.50 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-032000 AMT- 51.37 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 • 4GE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER =`-C10-0'2 MOUNDS VIEW _NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN COUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-033000 AMT- 88.09 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 OUNT NUMBER- 700-41'21-0:33000 AMT- 116.16 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/9'2 COUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-032000 AMT- 51.37 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-033000 AMT- 87.40 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-41'21-03=000 AMT- 152.05 DESC-PENSIONS 7/10/92 VENDOR TOTAL 4355.69 4355.4 :970 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, IN* 38137 07/10/92 07/10/92 :3485.34 8485 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-040000 AMT- 356.76 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-040000 AMT- 65.38 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-040000 AMT- 706.25 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-040000 AMT- 393.13 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-040000 AMT- 130.76 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-040000 AMT- 223. 30 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 AMT- 3154.44 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-040000 AMT- 6662.92 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-040000 AMT- 70.84 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-040000 AMT- 566.60 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-040000 AMT- 283.30 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-040000 AMT- 414.49 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-040000 AMT- 566.60 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-040000 AMT- 414.51 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-040000 AMT- 414.06 DESC-HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY VENDOR TOTAL 8485.34 6485.: :020 MEDICA 38188 07/10/92 07/10/92 976.50 976. OUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-040000 AMT- 173.30 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM-JULY AMOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-041000 AMT- 173. 30 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-040000 AMT- 173.30 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 AMT- 173.30 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-040000 AMT- 283.30 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM-JULY VENDOR TOTAL 976.50 976. ,000 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLA* 38189 07/10/92 07/10/92 342.85 :342.== ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 AMT- 130.80 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-040000 AMT- 106.02 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-040000 AMT- 106.03 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM-JULY VENDOR TOTAL 3342.85 342.'_ 970 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, IN* 33190 07/10/92 07/10/92 247.33 -47.: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-042000 AMT- 47.90 DESC-DENTAL INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4120-042000 AMT- 18. 13 DESC-DENTAL INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-042000 AMT- 27.19 DESC-DENTAL INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-042000 AMT- 15.24 DESC-DENTAL INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-042000 AMT- 109.78 DESC-DENTAL INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-042000 AMT- 15.05 DESC-DENTAL INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-042000 AMT- 15.04 DESC-DENTAL INSURANCE PREMIUM-JULY -- - VENDOR TOTAL 247.33 247.: 700 COMMERICAL LIFE INSUR* 38191 07/10/92 07/10/92 :347.20 347- 0 47.• AGE 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER ='-C10;02 MOUNDS VIEW ENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN OUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-041000 AMT- 35.30 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY OUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-041000 AMT- 22.65 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY COUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-041000 AMT- 4.25 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-041000 AMT- 10.73 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-041000 AMT- 45.70 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-041000 AMT- 1.70 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-041000 AMT- 96.68 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-041000 AMT- 3.98 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-041000 AMT- .42 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-041000 AMT- 3.40 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4340-041000 AMT- 3.40 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-041000 AMT- 44.90 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-041000 AMT- 4.25 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-041000 AMT- : .' 5 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-041000 AMT- 1.70 DESC-LIFE INS - JULY VENDOR TOTAL 347.20 347.2 '900 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 38192 07/10/92 07/10/92 42.50 42.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-035000 AMT- 42.50 DESC-DEFINED CONTRIBUTIONS VENDOR TOTAL 42.50 50 42.5 .0x20 CHANHASSEN DINNER THE* 38193 07/10/92 07/10/92 330.00 320,0; ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-140213 AMT- 330.00 DESC-RENTAL OF COSTUMES-"CAMELOT 38194 07/10/92 07/10/92 200.00 200.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-16021:3 AMT- 200.00 DESC-DEPOSIT ON COSTUMES-"CAMELOT" • VENDOR TOTAL 530.00 530.t '020 ER I CK:SON'S NEWMARKET 38195 195 07/13/92 07/13/92 23.58 2:3,5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-303000 AMT- 23.58 DESC-DELI TRAY VENDOR TOTAL 23.58 23.5 700 SKELLY, JERRY JR. 38196 07/13/92 07/13/72 175.00 175.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-160000 AMT- 175.00 DESC-NFLCP CONFERENCE VENDOR TOTAL 175.00 175.0 008 AARP 38197 07/14/92 07/14/92 2 i 12 • 1. •'. lit 1 sem.'_ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160130 AMT- 112.00 DESC-"55 ALIVE" JULY 13 & 14 VENDOR TOTAL 112.00 112.0 200 BEST WESTERN 3„1198 07/15/92 07/15/92 157.6:3 157.' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-363000 AMT- 157.48 DESC-ATTENDING WASTE WATER CONF VENDOR TOTAL 157.68 157.6 200 MORGAN, L Y NNETTE 38199 07/15/92 07/15/92 67.61 67.1_ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AM;'- 67.41 DESC-REIMBURSEMENT FOR OFFICE SPPLS VENDOR TOTAL 67.61 67.E 205 BOND, MICHAEL 38200 07/15/92 07/15/92 1100.00 1100.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-435:3-020213 AMT- 1100.00 DESC-MUSICAL DIRECTOR III I 2tGE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER '-C10-O2 MOUNDS VIEW ENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN • VENDOR TOTAL 1100.00 1100.0 GRAND TOTAL 96'7'10.32 96210.f= • •