HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 0922'Y
I -I' nlArit- IL
L A WHU IT CONTIENT I IKU P Y % KA C� 1-PAPO Lb " RY B 1 N' 1 N'
AR111TRIVNI-IN 1`1Ji(_1V1ST()N1,A
WHEREAS, tho cl&Ly of Richfield lie% inlitlated a. la-vouit
contentinq the vompulsory- 1-indinq Arbit)-tion provinion14 br, KiLM
(C ty of kichtiold 4. 1,cicaj Win. Intairmlional Associiticir,
.1 vL 4 A -1
rif Pirr, Fjtjtjfrf-j ri-Itl qjrtt� Of ?41f,h.�WA 4, Tnt,4-r- nor
jr- f ) ? o nd
14PEPEk-9, thirm Pirniol't i!B cUrventI.-I, kinle-I the
Minnesota Supreme Court; and
1111-LAEAS, thc VURA �,Ind3nq arbitration prOviffit-ing- deldghte
tunc-Lapaental douisitins reyardiny Lim kil-14, QXt-PI-it and cost Or
governmental serviren to-privnfe, politically
indJvidualxj and
WHORRAS, cities in Minnesota havn genurally had poor
expationc* with those binding arbitration provisions in thot
OcUlons have tim
collactiva barqA'ininq nrm�-nmtzj and
-.WHXAL%St -other, vlable, move fair and. just alternatives dr.
axist to r -he PURA bindinq arbitr&tton provigionlij,
NOW THLYA-KRA, US IT RLS0-,.#VLU by the Cuunqil of the City
a f Houtic'. I viewt Kinpulots, as followni
City -supports- the Ci -t t - of Riehfitld AA--this-
lawsuit and divicts Uhat A � jePy -f t1iii! -1,6404ution -of
support be lil.ed with the Loaque u4s: Minnesota cittes-i
That the SUM -of Jp tmrahy authorized -to bw- pai*
to the League of "innesota C14,404 t�z Assist in finallaing
the- -coat--of -appeal in,-, this JaWsolt, to the Minnesota
A
Supreva Court.
Adopted thin 28th day of August, 1978.
ATTZOTt
4 9!k,/
or
�T
(SLAL)
�_&-aeAA