Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1992/10/13 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1992 7:00 P.M. AGENDA The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by staff and appointed commissions, committees and boards. Decisions are based on this information, as well as City policy and practices, input from constituents and a Councilmember's personal judgement. If you have comments, questions or information regarding an item on the agenda, please step forward to be recognized by the Mayor during the "Residents Requests and Comments From the Floor" item on the agenda. Please state your name and address for the record. All comments are appreciated. A copy of all printed materials relating to the agenda item is available for public inspection at the Recording Secretary's Table. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3 . ROLL CALL - Linke Wuori Quick Rickaby Blanchard 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 28, 1992 Regular Meeting COUNCIL ACTION: A T D October 6, 1992 Special Meeting COUNCIL ACTION: A T D AGENDA PAGE TWO OCTOBER 13, 1992 5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: A. Adoption and Presentation of Resolution No. 4293 Commending Bill Hanggi and Steve Dazenski for Their Ingenuity and Efforts in Developing a Fire Hydrant Repair Device, Staff Report No. 92-397C COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 6. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR Citizens' comments are encouraged to allow individual citizens to address the Council, as a whole, on a matter of interest or concern to the citizens. The preservation of the Citizens' Comments item on the agenda is important in order to encourage and maintain this information flow. To preserve and protect this valuable communications link, a speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: No public hearings scheduled for this meeting. 8. CONSENT AGENDA: A- AdoptResolution No--4291 Approving Just_ t Claims Against City Funds B. Adopt Resolution No. 4288 Approving a Wage Adjustment for Kitty Hickok, Payroll Clerk, Staff Report No. 92-398C C. Authorize Purchase of Two Used Staff Cars at a Cost Not to Exceed $20, 000 to be Funded from Account No. 100- 4260-704 and a Transfer of Additional Funds As Necessary from Account No. 100-4500-910 to Account No. 100-4260-704, Staff Report No. 92-399C D. Adopt Resolution No. 4289 Requesting an Increase in the City's Municpal State Aid Street Designation, Staff Report No. 92-400C AGENDA PAGE THREE OCTOBER 13, 1992 E. Adopt Resolution No. 4287 Ratifying the Appointment of Election Judges for the General/Municipal Election, Staff Report No. 92-401C F. Approval of Position Classifications, Staff Report No. 92-402C G. Licenses for Approval Asphalt - Expires 6/30/93 Bituminous Consulting and Contracting, Co. , Inc. - New Signs - Expires 6/30/93 Schad-Tracy Signs, Inc. - New Sign Art Company, Inc. - Renewal Universal Sign Company - Renewal Heating and Air Conditioning - Expires 6/30/93 Steve's Heating Service, Inc. - New Wenzel Heating and Air Conditioning - Renewal COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 9. COUNC-IL—BUSINESS: A. Consideration of Resolution No. 4290 Approving/Denying the Sign Area Variance Request by Paster Enterprises for the Property Located at 2577 Highway 10, Planning Case No. 350-92 , Staff Report No. 92-403C COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: AGENDA PAGE FOUR OCTOBER 13 , 1992 B. Consideration of Resolution No. 4292 Approving/Denying the Sign Area Variance Request by Paster Enterprises for the Property Located at 2541 Highway 10, Planning Case No. 351-92 , Staff Report No. 92-404C COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: C. Consideration of Franchise Agreement and Implementation of Franchise Fee, Staff Report No. 92-405C 1) Consideration of Ordinance No. 517 Granting NSP an Electric Franchise COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Linke Blanchard Quick Wuori Rickaby 2) Consideration of Ordinance No. 518 Granting NSP a Gas Franchise COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Linke Blanchard Quick Wuori Rickaby 3) Consideration of Ordinance No. 519 Implementing an Electric and Gas Franchise Fee COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Linke Blanchard Quick Wuori Rickaby COUNCIL ACTION: A T D 10. REPORTS: 1. Report of Councilmembers: Wuori, Rickaby Quick, Blanchard AGENDA PAGE FIVE OCTOBER 13, 1992 2 . Report of Mayor Linke 3 . Report of Administrator 4. Report of Staff 5. Report of Attorney 11. ADJOURNMENT: NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION: NOVEMBER 2, 1992 NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: OCTOBER 26, 1992 N APPROVLD PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting October 13, 1992 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 CALL TO ORDER •ie Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor Linke at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 13, 1992 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was said. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Wuori, Rickaby, Quick, Blanchard and Mayor Linke. MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, Paul Harrington, City Planner, Don Brager, Finance Director, Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to approve September 28, 1992 minutes as presented. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried • Mounds View City Council Page Regular Meeting October 13, 1 MOTION/SECOND: Rickaby/Wuori to approve October 6, 1992 minutes as amended. Councilmember Wuori stated that on the first motion Quick made the motion and Wuori seconded it. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: a. Mayor Linke introduced and read Resolution No. 4293 Commending Bill Hanggi and Steve Dazenski for Their Ingenuity and Efforts in Developing a Fire Hydrant Repair Device MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Quick to adopt Resolution No. 4293 Commending Bill Hanggi and Steve Dazenski for Their Ingenuity and Efforts in Developing a Fire Hydrant Repair Device- VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Linke presented Bill Hanggi and Steve Dazenski with Certificates of Appreciation and a Gift Certificate for their efforts. Mayor Linke thanked Mr. Hanggi and Mr. Dazenski and stated that this is an example of the fine employees the City of Mounds View employs. • RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: There were no residents requests or comments. PUBLIC HEARINGS No public hearings had been scheduled for this meeting. CONSENT AGENDA Samantha Orduno, City Adminittrator, read the Consent Agenda. Mayor Linke asked if there were any items the Council desired removed. Councilmember Rickaby requested that Item F. be removed from the Consent Agenda. MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Blanchard to adopt the Consent Agenda minus Item F. _VOTE: - 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Item F. Approval of Position Classifications was brought up for consideration. Councilmember Rickaby stated that the position reclassifications had been discussed at the last Work Session and it was h opinion that they needed more clarification and should be discussed in public. Mounds View City Council Page Three • ular Meeting October 13, 1992 Councilmember Rickaby asked what the duties of the maintenance receptionist were because arguments were made at the Work Session for reclassification of this position was that the duties were greater than those of the City Hall receptionist. Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that the duties of the maintenance receptionist were: phones, scheduling work for the Public Works workers, schedule final readings, computer entry including accounts payable, work accomplished reports, fuel usage and other various reports, all secretarial work and correspondence including filing. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed the duties of City Hall Receptionist as being: accepting and transferring of phone calls, very minimal work with animal licensing, no typing or secretarial duties as far as correspondence, and relaying information to staff members. Minetor stated that the maintenance receptionist position is actually more like a division secretary's position. Orduno explained that there are criteria that have to be met in order to reclassify a position. The positions, when compared, have to have similar duties, tasks and responsibilities in order to be reclassified to comparable positions. Inotherwords, if they walk like a duck, they should 41Fcalled a duck. Minetor explained that the present Public Works Foreman position is more like a supervisor's position because he supervises many classes of people. This position is responsible for supervising personnel in streets, water department, sewer department, and the division secretary. This position also works on a maintenance budget and sets maintenance project schedules. The Public Works Foreman supervises the maintenance division and is given main guidelines from the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. The Public Works Foreman position is comparable to a Maintenance Supervisor in the Stanton schedule. CouncilmemberRickaby—asked—Minetor what— positions-he-supervised-Minetor responded: supervises personnel in the Planning Department, the Building Inspector and the Building Department Secretary. " Councilmember Rickaby stated that maybe the City didn'tneed a full time engineer. This was discussed some time ago and Rickaby stated that the argument was that this position would be too difficult to replace as too many other people would have to be hired to replace this position. Rickaby stated that if the Public Works Foreman was doing supervisory work now, that perhaps the City should look at turning the City Engineer's position into a half time positionand not having this type of bureaucracy where a supervisor is supervising a supervisor. 41,chard Oman, 8205 Groveland Road, offered that when services expand ersonnel shouldn't be expanded to create a bureaucracy. Mounds View City Council Page Four Regular Meeting - - — -- October 13, lip Oman suggested that the City should look for ways to streamline various duties in order to maintain a smaller municipal government. Mayor Linke responded that the City has looked into streamlining various duties and not expanded personnel. Mayor Linke compared the City of Mounds View and its number of employees to those communities in the Metro area with the same or smaller square miles and have more employees than Mounds View. Linke further offered that of the 39 full time employed by Mounds View, 15 of these employees are police. The City has not expanded its number of employees. The only increase of personnel will be to add a police officer and if the City doesn't hire one it will put at risk the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the community. Orduno stated that the criteria used for reclassification of a position are: 1) have the duties and responsibilities of the position substantially changed in terms of degree of complexity and scope of diversity or, 2) are the duties and responsibilities of the position consistent with the complexity, diversity and accountability of a higher ranked position. There was one position that requested reclassification that did not meet the criteria and was not reclassified. Richard Oman asked that the reclassifications change the pay scales and are these change in pay scales budget for? . Orduno stated that in the past cities could pull pay scales out of the air. In the past there was no basis for pay equity. Two categories are considered when considering pay scales -- the market value and the internal comparison. This is state law. These categories impact how people will be paid. Councilmember Rickaby stated that when the Maintenance Secretary was hired a year ago the argument was made that some of her duties were being performed by the Public Works Foreman and other Public Works employees. The statement was made that it would be better to hire a lower paid person and let the Public-Works emp-loyees-do-other—work—that-needed to-be-done. Partthen-of the reclassification of the Public Works Foreman's position is that he then, by hiring the Maintenance Secretary, had one more class to supervise. Orduno stated that reclassifications are not based on who supervises who and how many one supervises. The reclassification has to do with the complexity, scope of diversity and accountability of a higher ranked position. If a person is kept in a position that does not clearly not reflect what they actually do, a person could appeal this to the Human Rights Department if the work performed did not meet their job or position description. Councilmember Wuori stated that the word bureaucracy had been used a lot to describe government. • • Mounds View City Council Page Five ------"pular Meeting October 13, 1992 Wuori further stated that the intent is not to hire new people when promoting the others. The City has no intent of hiring a new foreman to take the place of newly promoted public works supervisor. The City of Mounds View has a small streamlined City government. The City has many talented employees with varying abilities to do all of their work and take on responsibilities of other positions. This staff is a "lean mean fighting machine. " Roger Stigney, 8400 Eastwood, stated he was not opposed to the reclassification of the positions. Stigney stated that this state is in a severe recession, people have lost jobs, and people have taken cuts in their posi ions. T e Ci y mus run a very ig s ip an. pe .1 - b made. The City is paying $250, 000 to pay the top five salaries in the City. Perhaps the City doesn't need a full time public works director. Before taxpayers money is raised to pay salaries, the City should look at consolidation. Mayor Linke stated as he had said before, the City looks at every position. Linke asked Mr. Stigney, a candidate for a Council position, why he hasn't attended the budget meetingsand suggested that he would understand the budget process better if he did. Linke stated that then Mr. Stigney would have something to base his facts on. Linke stated that the City hires excellent people. Linke stated if the City would pay $2.95 for an employee, 4ike City would get an employee capable of doing $2 .95 work. The City has to y what the job is worth. A person running for Council should be in attendance at the meetings more than twice a year to understand the process for budgeting instead of making comments. Stigney replied that this is the second time he has run for City Council. Stigney stated that nothing has changed since the last time he ran for City office. Stigney stated that he had been in attendance at several meetings including the budget hearings. Stigney stated that he volunteered to form a task force to reduce City funds and show the City how to streamline the budget. If needed, he is still available to do this. Mayo-r-L-irk-e-s-t-at-ed-that-the-p-r-ese-ntCouncil from-1 oto 1992 was able to reduce the budget by 1.5% Stigney stated that the top five salaries cost the City $250,000 increasing every year. Council is not addressing the problems of the City. Orduno stated that out of the top five salaries, three of the five are below the Stanton mean, 80-90% below the Stanton mean. Orduno also stated that two other items are also considered when setting pay scales - Unions and Pay Equity. Orduno stated that she is in the top five salaries and her contract calls for her to receive an increase when other employees receive an increase. rduno stated that her salary alone, based on pay equity, is far below the edicted pay. Orduno stated that she did not take an increase nor did she orce the issue. Mounds View City Council Page Six Regular Meeting - - - - - October 13, 190 Sharon Croon, Eastwood Road, stated that she works at a large corporation and that job classifications are not worth a hill of beans. The Corporate managers where she is employed are taking pay cuts. Why can't employees of the City of Mounds View take pay cuts? Orduno stated that Sears is not under state law. None of the private sector business are under the state pay equity law. Orduno explained the pay equity law. Orduno stated that with regards to Unions in terms of negotiations an arbitrator for police or fire would not uphold a 0% increase. There is a different perspective in the public sector vs. the private sector. Croon stated that the City should start at the top and work down as far as pay cuts. Have the cuts be across the board and deal with pay equity law. It has to be started someplace. Other people in the community are taking pay cuts and losing jobs. - Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, wanted to know if a job description is the same thing as a position classification. Orduno stated that it is a title for certain duties. Mayor Linke explained that the work that these people are doing does not f ilo the job that they are doing. Bill Frits asked how many unions the City has. Frits stated that his belief is the City has one Union and one decertified bargaining unit which has no force in law. Frits further stated that he doesn't support non-union workers getting union wages. These people can be cut. Comparable worth is comparable throughout the City. Frits stated if you cut one cut them all including yourself. Rickaby stated that the Planning Technician was reclassified to City Planner. Rickaby asked the reclassification compares with City Planners in the-past? Orduno explained that job duties have changed. The level of accountability and investigation issues has grown. Paul works with the City Attorney regarding development agreements. Orduno stated that Paul is far superior to the other City Planners that the City has employed. Orduno stated that many things fell through the cracks. Paul's expertise is such that he has been involved in tax increment and development agreements since he began employment with the City. Paul is doing duties far beyond those of a Planning Technician. Paul is also primary liaison to the Planning Commission. Planning Technicians do not do this job nor do they get involved with TIF or development agreements. Planning Technicians that have been with the City in the past have not been involved to the degree that Paul has. • Mounds View City Council Page Seven • ular Meeting October 13, 1992 Councilmember Rickaby stated that during the Council discussions regarding the hiring of this position, it was stated that the City wasn't going to need as much planning experience because the City's planning was nearly completed and that is why the City was hiring a Planning Technician. The City went to a lower level position and then that person gets put into a higher level classification and receives higher pay which defeats the hiring of a Planning Technician. Rickaby stated that she has no argument that he does a wonderful job and she is not arguing against his reclassification. Mayor Linke stated that Paul was hired and he grew into the reclassified position and that tells the City that it did a good job of hiring and that the City could watch him grow into a higher position. Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that the City has to look at the past. In the past the City tried to go with a Planning Technician and it hasn't worked. Paul has gone beyond what the position called for. The City benefitted from a tight job marked. Paul cannot be cut back to Planning Technician. The City's has benefitted from Paul's experience. Paul has done the job and gone beyond Planning Technician. Nearly every City has a Planning Technician and a City Planner. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Rickaby to Approve Position Classifications . VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried COUNCIL BUSINESS: A. Paul Harrington, City Planner, reviewed Staff Report No. 92-403 regarding approving/denying the Sign Area Variance Request by Paster Enterprises for the Property Located at 2577 Highway 10. Harrington stated that Paster Enterprises, representing Budget Liquor, has made application for a variance to allow for signage in excess of City allowed size requirements at 2577 Highway 10 (Mounds View Square) . The Mounds-View-P-ianning-G i-ss-ion-aha-speci-a-1-Oc-to-be-r1.,,19_92 meeting, reviewed and denied the request as proposed. The applicant is now exercising his right of appeal of that decision to the City Council as allowed by the Municipal Code. Paul Harrington then introduced Jim Everson, representative from Paster Enterprises, to go over the request. Mayor Linke stated that the Mounds View code allows for up to 100 square feet of sign area per business occupant in the form of a wall sign. The applicant has proposed two signs each approximately 185 square feet in area to be located on the south and west sides of the building. The plans indicate that both signs will be illuminated. John Streeter, Paster Enterprises stated that the Budget Liquor sign would have 42" letters instead of 36" letters as in the past. • Mounds View City Council _______— Page Eight Regular Meeting _ _ October 13, 19• Councilmember Blanchard stated that the Planning Commission had gone over this request and turned it down because it is not in conformance with the City Code. Councilmember Rickaby stated that from the City's perspective perhaps the appearance of the shopping center is more important than the size of the signage. If all of the tenants are in agreement and more shoppers would be attracted to the center, the signage should not be the City's concern. Rickaby stated that the Code should be adjusted if sign size is too much of a barrier for allowing signage that would bring adequate business to the shopping center. Mayor Linke stated his concurrence with Councilmember Rickaby. Councilmember Blanchard stated that the Planning Commission was concerned because they are to interpret the Code as written. Blanchard stated that until the Code is changed the signage shouldn't be allowed. Councilmember Wuori stated that if the City wants the business community to bring business into the City it needs to have the same type of image as other shopping centers and perhaps it is time to update the sign code. Wuori stated some concern with the wrap around illuminated sign on the west side because the homeowners on that side will have to deal with more light. • Councilmember Blanchard moved to deny the sign area variance request by Paster Enterprises for the property located at 2577 Highway 10 Motion failed due to lack of a second. MOTION/SECOND: Rickaby/Wuori to approve Resolution No. 4290 Approving the Sign Area Variance Request by Paster Enterprises for the Property Located at 2577 Highway 10 VOTE: 4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried B. MOTION/SECOND: Rickaby/Linke to approve Resolution No. 4292 Approving the Sign Area Variance Request by Paster Enterprises for the Property Located at 2541 Highway 10 VOTE: 4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried C. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed the gas and electric franchise agreements by stating that the two franchise agreements are basically very similar to the existing franchise agreements but allow the City more control in regards to performance stipulations both for the City and NSP in regards to the use of public ground, relocation of facilities and required permit procedures. Both agreements provide fll, Mounds View City Council Page Nine (pular Meeting October 13 , 1992 Both agreements provide for a franchise fee of no more than 4% on the gross operating revenues of NSP and a monthly payment schedule of the fees to the City as opposed to annual payments after one year as the provision of the current franchise. Mayor Linke stated that the agreements are basically the same as in the past with the exception of the payment schedule and the improved control over work being done in the City by NSP. Orduno stated that there is a blank on page 6 of the gas and electric franchise agreements that should be filled in with 4% on both documents. Judy Trude, 8391 Knollwood Drive, stated her objection to having the 4% fee in the agreement at all and wanted it removed from the agreement. Trude asked how much revenue would be raised with the franchise fee? Mayor Linke explained that the franchise fee, if implemented, would raise $277, 000. Linke stated that an 8.3% raise in property taxes would only raise $155, 000. Property taxes would have to increase by 22% to raise the $277, 000. . Trude stated that 4% would raise $277, 000. The City only needs $155, 000 to balance the budget. Is it the intention of the Council to pass the agreement with the maximum fee? This would raise $125, 000 more than the City needs to balance the budget at 4%. Trude asked the Council what was heard from the people at the public hearing on this subject. Mayor Linke responded that the main speakers at the public hearing were from the business community and it was favored to increase the property taxes rather than implement the franchise fee. Councilmember Rickaby stated that the residents were in attendance one—y-ear—ago—and we-re—agni-nst he—fra-nehise fee. Trude stated that the franchise fee is an inequitable tax and that everyone is not affected the same -- some will pay more, some less. Trude suggested that the Council vote on the agreements minus the franchise fee. Property taxes would be lower than the franchise fee. Councilmember Rickaby stated that was an excellent idea, leave the 4% out and it can be voted in anytime in the future. Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, stated that this franchise fee is a revenue source for the 1993 budget. McCarty asked, if the Council does not intend to adopt Ordinances 517 and 518, what purpose does Ordinance 519 serve. Mounds View City Council Page ill Regular Meeting _ October 13, 1 Mayor Linke stated that it is an option and that staff was asked to prepare the ordinance to include the entire package. McCarty stated to not adopt Ordinance 519 with the franchise fee agreements would be a moot point. McCarty stated that he has not had a flood of phone calls relating to the gas and electric franchise agreements. McCarty stated that the franchise agreements and implementation of the franchise fee should have been a part of the budget process and discussed at the hearing. McCarty suggested that the Council table this item and make it a part of the budget process in the future. Charlie Hall, Mermaid, stated that the business community feels that the 4% fee should not be added and it should be deleted from the agreement. Richard Oman, stated that he does not object to the franchise, but is in opposition to the fee because it is an inefficient way to collect revenues and it adds on a new layer of administration costs. Mr. Oman stated that the residents should not pay NSP to administer paperwork. Mayor Linke explained that NSP cannot charge the City any • administrative costs for collecting the fee. State law doesn't allow for that. Richard Oman stated that the residents will also pay 6.5% sales tax on a revenue source for the City. If taxes are raised it increases the property taxes but adds nothing new to the bill. Steve Lauterbach, 8285 Knollwood Drive, stated that he is opposed to the franchise fee. Property taxes should be increased. Residents will pay less with the franchise fee but businesses will pay more as well as the churches and schools. The franchise fee shouldbe-removed-from the-agreement. Russ Young, 3032 County Road I, stated that NSP when they were to cut trees on his land asked but the City demanded the trees be cut or the City would cut them down. Mayor Linke stated that he did not understand the problem with the trees. Orduno stated that Mr. Young should contact the City tomorrow and she would be glad to research the problem surrounding the cutting of the trees. Mayor Linke stated that NSP doesn't have to inform the City when they are working in the City. Ruth White, 2917 County Road I, stated that in her opinion the franchise fee is .a sneaky way to raise taxes. This franchise • Mounds View City Council Page Eleven •gular Meeting — October 13, 1992 fee would be very hard on senior citizens. If the property taxes are increased there is a circuit breaker that aids residents in getting some of the money back. White suggested the franchise fee be eliminated from the franchise agreement. Terry Wiley, 2279 Oakwood Drive, stated that contrary to the other 25 people in the room he thinks that the residents have to pay for services received from the City. The City needs a certain number of dollars to run the City. The funds have to come from somewhere. Wiley suggested leaving all options open. If the City does not leave all options open regaz ding the fr-nchise fee and the City doesn't have options they can't use them. Charlie Hall, Mermaid Supper Club, stated that the residents of the community are crying out for help with regards to not implementing the franchise fee and he hopes the Council hears them. Mr. Hall stated that the City Administrator is a nice person to work with, the Mayor has met with him several times and is a tribute to the City. Mr. Hall hopes that the Council listens to the business community and the residents and does not implement the franchise fee. Chuck Miller, 2408 Laport asked about levy limits. Mayor Linke explained that the City has no control over property taxes. The County has control on property valuation and the State sets how much of the rates are charged against that. This amount affects what the City levies. Orduno explained why the City must look for alternative means of revenue and not be dependent on local government aids. Mr. Miller stated that the City must adjust spending. Miller stated that persons at his company have not had a raise in three years. Orduno gave another example of mandates on the City -- the 6.5% sales tax. This was not something budgeted for. Linke stated that the City during the budget process looks into not only property taxes but license fees and various other revenue sources for the City. The franchise fee would be looked at during the budget process just as the other revenues are. Laurie Schley, Knollwood Drive stated that she objects to having NSP collecting the franchise fee. Schley stated that people should pay for services. NSP treats her very well. Schley believes that the City should not have a third party collecting funds for the City's General Fund budget. Schley states that by having the • property tax increase it makes the residents of the City responsible customers of the City budget. • Mounds View City Council Page Twelve Regular Meeting October 13, 1111 Charles Miller stated that the franchise fee has been in existence for 18 years and has never had to be used. The fee has raised its head in the past. The property tax process is already established and should be used. The property tax amount has already been submitted to the State. Councilmember Rickaby during a meeting Don Brager stated that by increasing the property tax the City would receive more in fiscal disparities. The fiscal disparity would not be felt that year but the next year. Rickaby stated that whatever amount the City Council decides to set for the franchise fee, that amount will go up with no action on the part of the residents. Councilmember Rickaby stated that on the survey when asked about the franchise fee, 63% voted against it. Charlie Hall, Mermaid, stated again that the residents are concerned about this franchise fee and it should be deleted from the agreements. Dave Schwartz of NSP stated that one out of 42 has a franchise fee in affect. Mr. Schwartz stated that he has negotiated 27 franchise agreements in the past five years. Five or six out of those have the franchise fee provision in their agreements but none have evoked it. Councilmember Rickaby asked how many hours Mr.Schwartz has spent on dealing with this franchise fee in Mounds View. These hours will 41 collected somehow, and it is her assumption that it will be on the NSP bills. Charles Miller is not in agreement with paying a sales tax on a utility. Mr. Miller qualified the meaning of the word franchise. The way it is used in regards to the utility obscures its meaning. Judy Trude stated that if homeowners could not pay property taxes it would go on the tax roll. Dave Schwartz stated there will be accounts uncollectible. The non—paymentaeeounts—wild—be—deducted—from thefee paid—to—the City of Mounds View. Councilmember Rickaby stated then that the franchise fee does not have such a stable base. Richard Oman stated that perhaps the implementation of the franchise fee be tabled until the budget process is complete and then deal with the franchise agreements and implementation of the fees. Oman suggested January or February and let the franchise fee survive on its own merits. The budget will be finished in December. Oman stated - again that the franchise fee implementation should be tabled as there is no pressure to pass it for October, November or December of 1992. 410 Mounds View City Council Page Thirteen •gular Meeting —October 13, 1992 Dave Schwartz, NSP, stated that the City's franchise agreement has a separate fee policy which calls for a public hearing. Trude want a clarification regarding the hearings. Trude asked if the City would have to hold another hearing before the implementation of the fee could be voted on. Mayor Linke explained that a item three could be acted on tonight as the City has met all requirements of the City Charter. The fee could be collected yearly instead of monthly per the existing agreement. Orduno clarified that the current franchise has 8 more years to be in effect. Charles Miller asked to hear the Council's reasons for wanting the franchise fee and how it would be better for the City residents. Mayor Linke stated that he has had the privilege to sit for many years on the Council and work on many budgets. Linke stated that he has seen the volatility of property tax increases. Linke stated that last year the Council was able to reduce the budget by 1.5% but had to raise taxes to make up the difference because of • property taxes going down. The franchise fee is a revenue source that the City can count on. The franchise fee will not fluctuate by "whoever has a bee in their bonnet" in the legislature. The City has had to reduce the fund balance and draw it down and loose interest and with the franchise fee money being put in monthly the City would earn interest on that money. Councilmember Wuori stated that she had not made up her mind as to how to vote on the franchise fee. Councilmember Wuori stated that it bothered her to rely on taxes. Perhaps a sliding scale could be looked into. The government has a habit of changing their minds and it is done in the middle of our budget year. If something isn't done, each year-the-City-wi-.-1a-1-l—back-l-ityle-by Ilttle. Councilmember Quick stated that no one knows how much the state will cut us this year. Quick asked where does the City make its cuts -- non-essential services, what are non-essential services -- parks, recreation, streets, maintenance. The City has a one million dollar payroll in Police alone. The franchise fee will help Mounds View stay in the future. If the City doesn't do anything Mounds View could become a part of Shoreview, New Brighton or Arden Hills. In order to plan for the future the Council has to make tough decisions. Maybe one of the candidates in the audience will have to deal with the $950,000 cuts next budget session. Mounds View City Council Page Fourtee Regular MeetingOctober 13, 19 _ Councilmember Blanchard stated that the franchise fee is a stable resource for the City and is a revenue the City can depend on for future years. The City could buy down property taxes. Councilmember Rickaby stated that what she was hearing from the rest of the Council is that the City Council would do a franchise rate that would bring in $155, 000 which would be the same as 8.3 percent maximum levy that can be done. The City could still receive cuts in the middle of the year whether or not there was a franchise fee or property tax increase. The cuts are LGA cuts and they are very different than property taxes. Rickaby doesn't support 8.3% increase but with some cuts being reinstated from the results of the survey, the City then couldtake extra money and put it in the fund balance. Rickaby further stated if the City puts the increase on the property tax instead of the franchise fee the City could get more fiscal disparity relief. If the City has higher taxes, it receives more fiscal disparity relief for the next year. Don Brager, Finance Director, explained the situation regarding fiscal disparities. Last year Mayor Linke stated that Park and Recreation programs had to be cut. These cuts were reinstated because people were upset and the many phone calls had been received regarding these cuts. L. W. Stigney, 7141 Eastwood., stated that there should be a cap on what the City is spending every year.. Mayor Linke stated that the Council has made a conscientious effort to maintain services. There are no levy limits and the City could raise the taxes as high as it would want to. The firing o ice officer—is—the—only—service—that—is—be ng added. Don Brager, Finance Director, stated that the Council is limited to the amount that could be raised because the amount was already submitted and accepted. Council could lower but not raise taxes. • Councilmember Rickaby stated that Mayor Linke made comments regarding Park and Recreation cuts in that he received phone calls regarding those cuts. The survey taken supported cuts in Parks Maintenance. The City has reinstated those cuts. -- - - The phone calls received may have been over former cuts in children's programs. The survey indicated discontinuing dragging and the reduction411 in ice rinks. Items that the survey indicated the residents wanted back were put back in. Steve Lauterbach stated that the current franchise agreement does not expire for eight years. When would the new franchise Mounds View City Council — - - - Page Fifteen Regular Meeting October 13, 1992 • agreement go into effect. John Thomson stated that the present franchise fee expires May 1, 1998. The existing franchise fee agreement allows the City to implement a franchise fee of up to 4% and if fee was implemented it would be paid yearly. The City went to NSP and negotiated to have the fee collected monthly and paid monthly to the City. Councilmember Rickaby stated that a young man had attended a past Council meeting and was concerned with the City's franchise fee because he thought more environmental issues should be written into it. He then stated that he supported the franchise fee because it would discourage high end users. With the sliding scale the high energy users could decide to use more because they could fit into a smaller rate. • MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Quick to approve Ordinance No. 517 Granting NSP an Electric Franchise VOTE: Mayor Linke - aye Councilmember Quick - aye 40 Councilmember Rickaby - no Councilmember Blanchard - aye Councilmember Wuori - aye • Motion Passes. MOTION/SECOND: Quick Blanchard to approve Ordinance No. 518 Granting NSP a Gas Energy Franchise Mayor Linke - aye Councilmember Quick - aye Councilmember Rickaby -. no Councilmember Blanchard---aye Councilmember Wuori - aye Mayor Linke stated that in regards to Ordinance No. 519 Implementing a Gas and Electric Franchise Fee the Council has many options. The options were read and reviewed by Mayor Linke. Charles Miller stated that if Perot gave us a check for $155,000 the City would still be affected by State cuts in June. Mayor Linke stated if the City received cuts in HACA or LGA the City would be $100K short; The City would then have to look into budget reserves. Mayor Linke stated that the property tax increase should • have been 10 or 11%. Charles Miller stated that the increase should be put on property tax Mounds View City Council Page Sixteen Regular Meeting October 13, 10 Charles Miller stated that the increase should be put on property tax so the franchise fee could be used to fall back on. If the franchise fee is implemented now there will be nothing to fall back on. In an emergency the franchise fee could be implemented for the remainder of that year. Roger Stigney stated that in viewing the options the Council has looked at the top users but not at the low income users. No circuit breaker has been provided for low income users. Stigney stated he strongly opposes the franchise fee implementation. Wiley stated that the City is $155, 000 in the hole on a proposed budget. The City needs $155, 000 to balance the budget. Wiley stated opposition to paying 6.5% taxes on something he doesn't want to pay taxes on. The franchise fee is a long term solution for $155, 000. It would collect $40. 00 from every resident and commercial business. Short term solution would be to follow the standard process. This is putting something on that doesn't go away. The City needs a short term fix to balance the 1993 but and then needs to get into synchronization with the State. The Council needs have the budget year go from July to July. . Mayor Linke stated that going July to July had been brought up before and that there is something in the statutes that prevents 111 it. Most cities are on calendar years. Wiley stated that the City needs something to fall back on for catastrophic events. The City needs something in reserve. Trude stated that if using Option 3 , it would only raise 6% of. a $3 million budget. Is all the bad will worth it? Charlie Hall asked the Council if they was listening to the people. Hall stated this is a disproportionate tax as far as-commer-ci-a-.4-indus-tri.a3.-.t=he-businesses-will wither_a die. Mayor Linke stated that he made an error when considering the 8.3% property tax increase. It should have been 11 or 12%. Barb Haake asked if the 8.3% in property tax increase could be amended in December. John Thomson stated that per the Truth In Taxation Law, the City has to input the maximum tax the City is going to levy by September 15. Taxes can't be changed. Mayor Linke asked if there is a penalty for increasing taxes. Brager responded that there is no penalty provision but a change in levy limit could reflect a reduction in the City's LGA. This Mounds View City Council Page Seventeen •egular Meeting October 13, 1992 law may have a similar provision. Councilmember Blanchard stated that the sliding fee option is not fair to residents. Councilmember made a motion to implement the 3% franchise fee across the board with a sunset clause after five years which would end in December of 1998. Councilmember Rickaby asked what that would raise. Orduno responded that it would raise $207,960. Councilmember Wuori seconded the motion. Councilmember Blanchard stated that with the franchise fee of 3% across the board everyone would pay equally., Charlie Hall stated that the Council did not listen to the people. Judy Trude stated that this will hurt businesses but that doing a flat 3% is easier. Councilmember Rickaby stated that many business people were in attendance and nearly unanimously, except for Charlie Hall, preferred the property tax increase. Charlie Hall stated that 6 to 12 business people talked to the Mayor and Samantha. 100% of those persons favored the property tax increase. Councilmember Blanchard stated that she could only vote on what she felt was best for the residents of the City. Mayor Linke admitted an error on hie—part_and_should have went for 12% on property tax increase limit. One option the City could - •- • • • • - • • • 0 . - 'b crease s raig across e •oar• or the franchise fee and an 8.3 increase in property taxes. Charles Miller stated that the City would be giving up its 4% buffer if it went with 1% on the franchise fee. Miller stated it would be better to put the 8.3% on the property taxes and save the 4% franchise fee as a buffer to use if necessary. Miller asked if the franchise fee is implemented at 3% would there still -bean increase in property-taxes: - — Mayor Linke responded in his opinion there would not be. Barb Haake suggested the franchise fee implementation be tabled. Mounds View City Council Page Eighteen Regular Meeting October 13, 1110 Annette L. , 7971 Knollwood, stated she is opposed to the franchise fee as she is on a very strict budget. VOTE: Mayor Linke - no Councilmember Rickaby - no Councilmember Quick - yes Councilmember Wuori - yes Councilmember Blanchard - yes Motion Passes REPORTS Report of Mayor Linke: Received a call from a developer who stated the City would not provide him with his Development Agreement until he paid his past due fees. Council concurred that the Development Agreement would be sent when the City received its check. Consensus of the Council: Quick - yes Wuori - yes Blanchard - yes Rickaby - yes Report of Councilmembers: Blanchard - attended the Fire Department Open House on Sunday. Wuori - no report nick=no-report Rickaby - no report Bill Frits asked what is happening with Williams Pipeline. Mr. Frits was asked to give Ric Minetor a call tomorrow. Report of Attorney: Regarding the property that has the boat on Sherwood. The property is owned by the bank and the bank has voluntarily offered to get an order to remove the boat so they are not liable. It will take two to three weeks to get the boat moved. This is more than the City having to move the boat.. Also, - - - mentioned was the general upkeep of the property and they agreed to take corrective action. The home will go back to HUD. i N i ` Mounds View City Council Page Nineteen • uiar Meeting - October 13 , 1992 There being no further business before the Council, Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 11:50 p.m. Respectfully subm).tted, i � / / / Mich= e Severson Recording Secretary 410 • 17 "�° ° Agenda Section: 5.A oums REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number:92-397C STAFF REPORT Report Date: 10-8-97 EW Council Action: X] Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE October 13, 1992 ❑ Public Hearings 0 Consent Agenda 0 Council Business Item Description: Commendation for Bill Hanggi and Steve Dazenski Administrators Review/R.ecommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; A hydrant cutoff tool was created by 2 of the City's maintenance employees. This tool was recently used to repair a broken hydrant and resulted in saving the City in excess of $2,500. The employees, Bill Hanggi and Steve Dazenski, worked on their own time in developing this tool. They identified the problem and need for the tool , determined the design, and manufactured the tool from spare items and their own labor. The hydrant at Silver Lake Road and Highway 10 was recently damaged. The normal break-off section of the hydrant did not function and the barrel section was cracked-. This would normally require the excavation of the entire barrel section down to the water main. The main is 9 feet deep and the hydrant is within 6 inches of the sidewalk. Therefore, the repair would have required removal of 20 feet of sidewalk, curb and gutter, and a portion of the asphalt street. We estimated that the work would have required over $2,800 in materials and labor. The maintenance crew used the new tool developed by Bill and Steve to repair this hydrant. Excavation was limited to the area needed to utilize the tool. The repair was completed in 4 hours with—no—dIsturba-n_ce to—adjacent sid-ewa- ,—cur-b—a-nd—g-ut-te-r, or street surface. The estimated cost is $150. Bill Hanggi and Steve Dazenski are to be commended for their efforts and the resulting significant savings to the City. Ric ine -City-Engineer/Director of Public Works - RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends that Bill Hanggi and Steve Dazenski be commended by the City Council for their efforts and that the attached Resolution of Commendation be adopted by the City Council. RESOLUTION NO. 4293 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION COMMENDING BILL HANGGI AND STEVE DAZENSKI FOR THEIR INGENUITY AND EFFORTS IN DEVELOPING A FIRE HYDRANT REPAIR DEVICE WHEREAS, Bill Hanggi and Steve Dazenski applied their ingenuity and talents in developing a device for repairing fire hydrants which saves considerable time and money; and WHEREAS, these two employees worked after hours on their own time in developing this device; and WHEREAS, the use of the device they developed has recently saved the City in excess of $2,500 in labor and materials; and WHEREAS, Bill Hanggi and Steve Dazenski were honored by the regional section of the American Water Works Association for the development of this device; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View commends Bill Hanggi and Steve Dazenski for their ingenuity and efforts in the development of this labor and money saving device. Adopted this _ day of , 199_. ATTEST Mayor SEAL City Administrator Hydrant Cut Off Tool Made By: Steve Dazenski and Bill Hanggi Made At: City of Mounds View, 2466 Bronson Drive This device is used to repair cracked and broken barrels. (Waterous Hydrants) This device can be used to make barrel extensions of any length. The tool was developed to repair hydrants where the hydrant barrel The tool will cut off the broken end of a hydrant leaving a square smooth edge for the gasket. The blade is then changed on the saw and replaced with a 1/4 inch thick blade. The tool is then lowered 1/2 inch and a groove is cut in the barrel to receive the snap ring. The hydrant can then be reassembled using extensions equal to what was discarded from the hydrant, bringing the barrel length back to its original length. This tool has helped us to reduce the time and size of the hole, to a minimum. The tool will allow us to work in confined areas. Example: A hydrant with 9 feet of bury, 6 inches from a sidewalk. Had we not had this tool, we would have had to take out four (4) 5 foot sections of sidewalk and dewater. Our repair does not take out any sidewalk and we only need to dig a hole, 3 foot by 4 foot by 4 feet deep. Total time from start to finish was four (4) hours. Comparison Old method: Items: 20 feet of sidewalk 20 feet B618 curb and gutter 3 yards concrete = $185.00 7 tons of asphalt = $154.00 1 hydrant barrel = $150.00 Labor and Equipment to dig and remove (Total of 8 hours) : 3 men = $433 .44 Skidloader = $400.00 Loader = $600.00 Dump Truck = $400.00 -Replacement-Labor: - - 3 men for 9 hours = $487.62 TOTAL COST $2,810.06 New method: 2 men for 4 hours = $144.48 TOTAL COST $144.48 RESOLUTION N0. 4291 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY • STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WHEREAS, The City Council has reviewed the claims numbers: 36482 oug 36582 in - A"•" • . 37808 through 37851 in the amount of $ 103,168.07 through in the amount of $ through in the amount of $ TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 294,703.39 and has found said claims to be just and correct; '-(list of any exception) NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated 10/14/92 by the vote ayes nayes ATTEST: Mayor (.SEAL) Clerk-Administrator • ►GE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER '-C10-01 y MOUNDS VIEW :NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUt 2014SON, DEBBIE 36482 10/14/92 10/14/92 18.50 18.` OUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352114 AMT- 18.50 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 18.50 18.` 500 GETTER, MYRON 36483 10/14/92 10/14/92 224.00 224.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 AMT- 224.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 224.00 224.0 200 LARSON, ROY 36484 10/14/92 10/14/92 32.00 32.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 AMT- 32.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 32.00 32.1 206 OTIS, JEANNE 36485 10/14/92 10/14/92 15.00 15.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352107 AMT- 15.00 DESC-REFUNDS VENDOR TOTAL 15.00 15.1 100 BARTZ, BERNICE 36486 10/14/92 10/14/92 15.00 15.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352107 AMT- 15.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 15.00 15.c 101 BOYLES, NANCY 36487 10/14/92 10/14/92 25.00 25.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351002 AMT- 25.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 25.1 102 BURNS, EILEEN 36488 10/14/92 10/14/92 100.00 100.1 4OUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352113 AMT- 100.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 100.00 100.0 103 CAMERON, BRUCE 36489 10/14/92 10/14/92 33.54 33•` ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-160213 AMT- 33.54 DESC-SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL 33.54 33. 104 COOPER, PAUL 36490 10/14/92 10/14/92 39.00 39.( ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352129 AMT- 39.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 39.00 39.1 105 CLOVES, JOHN 36491 10/14/92 10/14/92 20.00 20.t ---ACCOUNT-NUMBER=-700-2304=000000---AMT- 207,00 DEBC REFUND-HYDRANT DEPOSIT VENDOR TOTAL 20.00 20.1 106 GEERTS, CLARE D 36492 10/14/92 10/14/92 40.00 40.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 40.00 DESC-REFUND - 7600 KNOLLWOOD DR VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 40.1 107 FERGEN, SHERRI 36493 10/14/92 10/14/92 25.00 25.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351002 AMT- 25.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 25.1 408 GRZYBOWSKI, MARIE 36494 10/14/92 10/14/92 15.00 15.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352107 AMT- 15.00 DESC-REFUND 0 GE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER C10-Of MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUP. . VENDOR TOTAL 15.00 15.0 409 HUDY, TERRY 36495 10/14/92 10/14/92 100.00 100.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352113 AMT- 100.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 100.00 100.0 110 PASTER ENTERPRISES 36496 10/14/92 10/14/92 50.00 50.C: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-2303-000708 AMT- 50.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 50.( 111 RIEWE, LARUE 36497 10/14/92- 10/14/92 15.00 15.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352107 AMT- 15.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 15.00 15.0 112 ROERING, TERRY 36498 10/14/92 10/14/92 18.50 18.` ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352114 AMT- 18.50 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 18.50 18.E 113 SUSA 36499 10/14/92 10/14/92 40.00 40.c ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 AMT- 40.00 DESC-SEMINAR-DAZENSKI & WEINKE VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 40.0 114 UNITED PUBLICATIONS, * 36500 10/14/92 10/14/92 495.00 495.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-362000 AMT- 495.00 DESC-'92 SEMINAR - SAARION VENDOR TOTAL 495.00 495.( 114tIBEL, ROSELYN 36501 10/14/92 10/14/92 15.00 15.(. COUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352107 AMT- 15.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 15.00 15.{ 120 CHRISTENSEN, MARION F 36502 10/14/92 10/14/92 5.00 S.C. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-3334-000000 AMT- 5.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 5.00 5,C 121 LINDER, DENNIS 36503 10/14/92 10/14/92 36.98 36.' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-3210-000000 AMT- 36.00 DESC-REFUND ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-3820-000000 AMT- .98 DESC-REFUND VENDOR-TOTAL 36-98 36-.- 313 LARRY BEACH CONSTRUCT* 36504 10/14/92 10/14/92 75.00 75.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-2304-000000 AMT- 75.00 DESC-REFUND HYDRANT DEPOSIT VENDOR TOTAL 75.00 75.0 316 TOBIASON, NEIL 36505 10/14/92 10/14/92 96.00 96.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 AMT- 96.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 96.00 96.1 321 LADWIG, LOREN 36506 10/14/92 10/14/92 - 32.00 - - - 32.t ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 AMT- 32.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 32.00 32.( 0 aGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW =NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN 520 TTELSTADT, DON 36507 10/14/92 10/14/92 64.00 64.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 AMT- 64.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 64.0 2505 MN DEPT OF NATURAL RE* 36508 10/14/92 10/14/92 156.10 156.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4450-160000 AMT- 156.10 DESC-500 PINE TREES VENDOR TOTAL 156.10 156.1 )220 MILLER, MIKE 36509 10/14/92 10/14/92 224.00 224.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020129 AMT- 224.00 DESC-UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 224.00 224.0 )050 AEC - ENGINEERS & DES* :36510 10/14/92 5359 03/14/92 464.07 464.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 680-4120-30:3000 AMT- 464.07 DESC-INSP CONSTRUCTION 500 MG EWT VENDOR TOTAL 464.07 464.0. E675 ALMENDINGER, AUDREY 36511 10/14/92 10/14/92 30.00 30.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352107 AMT- 30.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 30.0 ;123 AMERICAN OFFICE PRODU* 36512 10/14/92 258423 09/25/92 102.02 102.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-160000 AMT- 102.02 DESC-TONER CARTRIDGES & NAME BADGES '36512 10/14/92 254575 06/05/92 880.00 880.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-70:3000 AMT- 880.00 DESC-5 TILT CHAIRS & 2 ARM CHAIRS 36512 10/14/92 253846 06/26/92 1952.30 1952.0 . OUNT NUMBER- 697-4121-121000 AMT- 1952.30 DESC-PANELS & UNITS (OFFICE AREA) 36512 10/14/92 253834 06/26/92 1286.60 . 1286.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 697-4121-121000 AMT- 1286.60 DESC-HALF-GLASS PANELS & POSTS 36512 10/14/92 253833 06/26/92 21. 4.50 2194.` ACCOUNT NUMBER- 697-4121-121000 AMT- 2194.50 DESC-PANELS, POSTS, & BINDER BIN 36512 10/14/92 258712 09/30/92 13.12 13.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 13.12 DESC-POCKET PORTFOLIO & BINDER VENDOR TOTAL 6428.54 6428.t 5159 AMERICAN PLANNING ASS* 36513 10/14/92 10/14/92 . 98.00 98.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-361000 AMT- 98.00 DESC-NATIONAL & CHAPTER DUES VENDOR-TOTAL 98.00 98f- 5265. ANDERSON FUEL & LUBRI* 36514 10/14/92 025298 09/21/92 900.00 900.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-170000 AMT- 900.00 DESC-TANK SYSTEM FOR BULK STORAGE VENDOR TOTAL .900.00 900.0 5900 APACHE HOSE & BELTING* 36515 10/14/92 255078 09/18/92 123.73 123.7 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-513000 AMT- 123.73 DESC-PARTS VENDOR TOTAL 123.73 123.7 '005 BEISSWENGER`S 36516 10/14/92 146A 09/23/92 84.14 84.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-122000 AMT- 84.14 DESC-"B" BUILD 36516 10/14/92 183A 09/28/92 13.81 13.E. • aGE 4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER ,-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW :NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN SOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 13.81 DESC-PARTS FOR WELL #1 VENDOR TOTAL 97.95 97.E ?080 BIFFS, INC 36517 10/14/92 10/14/92 155.10 155.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-356000 AMT- 155.10 DESC-OCTOBER SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 155.10 155.1 )875 BRICK, DAVID 36518 10/14/92 10/14/92 306.88 306.8,' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-363000 AMT- 306.88 DESC-SEMINAR EXPENSES VENDOR TOTAL 306.88 306.8 '000 BRIGHTON VETERINARY H* 36519 10/14/92 09/30/92 245.00 245.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-303000 AMT- 245.00 DESC-SEPTEMBER CHARGES VENDOR TOTAL 245.00 245.0 '090 BROWNING-FERRIS INDUS* 36520 10/14/92 0900-2423580 10/01/92 47.26 47.2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-356000 AMT- 47.26 DESC-OCTOBER SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 47.26 47.' p100 BURKHARTS 36521 10/14/92 106518 09/17/72 19.12 19.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 19.12 DESC-DAY COUNTER REFILL VENDOR TOTAL 19.12 19.1 1630 CARLSON EQUIPMENT COM* 36522 10/14/92 235644 09/28/92 44.60 44.¢. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-126000 AMT- 44.60 . DESC-COWHITE MARKING PAINT VENDOR TOTAL 44.60 44.6 000 LLULAR ONE 36523 10/14/92 09/23/92 65.42 65.4 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-310000 AMT- 65.42 DESC-OCTOBER SERVICE + AIRTIME VENDOR TOTAL 65.42 65.4 975 CONTRACT CLEANING SPE* 36524 10/14/92 09/13/92 819.52 819.` ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-351000 AMT- 701.84 DESC-JANITORIAL SERIVCE - SEPTEMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-121000 AMT- 117.68 DESC-JANITORIAL SERIVCE - SEPTEMBER VENDOR TOTAL 819.52 819.` 000 COPY SALES 36525 10/14/92 00164325 09/18/92 110.81 110.8 ACCOUNT-NUMBER- 730-4121-303000---AMT- 1-10..81 DESS TONER VENDOR TOTAL 110.81 110.8 800 CRAGUN'S CONF CTR - R* 36526 10/14/92 10/14/92 93.08 93.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-362000 AMT- 46.54 DESC-CONFERENCE - DAZENSKI ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-363000 AMT- 46.54 DESC-CONFERENCE - HANGGI VENDOR TOTAL 93.08 93.0 700 CY'S MENS WEAR 36527 10/14/92 55043 08/26/92 58.68 58.6 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-240000 AMT- 58.68 DESC-PANTS & NAME TAGS VENDOR TOTAL 58. 5 58.6 400 D-ROCK CENTER & POWER* 36528. 10/14/92 4537 09/22/92 78.48 78.4 • 1GE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW ENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUI\ .OUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-123000 AMT- 78.48 DESC-HOMRLITE PARTS VENDOR TOTAL 78.48 78.4 3050 DIESEL CAST WELDING 36529 10/14/92 60643 09/18/92 305.81 305.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-513000 AMT- 305.81 DESC-PARTS & LABOR VENDOR TOTAL 305.81 305.E )100 EPA AUDIO VISUAL,INC. 36530 10/14/92 00075150 09/16/92 73.63 73.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-160000 AMT- 73.63 DESC-10 TAPES VENDOR TOTAL 73.63 73.E 4600 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PR* 36531 10/14/92 181226 09/18/92 198.30 198.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 420-4121-160000 AMT- 198.30 DESC-27X2 INCH ADJ RINGS(20) VENDOR TOTAL 198.30 198.C. 1925 FEDORS MARKET 36532 10/14/92 09/30/92 50.96 50.': ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 50.9.6 DESC-MISC GROCERIES VENDOR TOTAL 50.96 50.5 5895 FRIENDLY CHEVROLET GE* 36533 10/14/92 181769 09/10/92 30.56 30.` ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 30.56 DESC-CAP ASM VENDOR TOTAL 30.56 30..T )040 G E CAPITAL CORPORATI* 36534 10/14/92 11683.682 09/20/92 69.64 69.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-303000 AMT- 69.64 DESC-OCTOBER LEASE PAYMENT 0 VENDOR TOTAL 69.64 69.E )545 GALLAGHERS SERVICE IN* 36535 10/14/92 09/24/92 121.62 121.t_ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-353000 AMT- 121.62 DESC-SEPTEMBER CHARGES VENDOR TOTAL 121.62 121.1 5755 W W GRAINGER INC 36536 10/14/92 497-880752-9 09/15/92 39.83 39.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 39.83 DESC-4 GAL TRI-PDXY SPRAYER 36536 10/14/92 497-880777-6 09/15/92 26.13 26.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 26.1.3 DESC-TIRE INFLATOR GAUGE VENDOR TOTAL 65.96 65.' 5850 GREENBELT INDUSTRIES 36537 10/14/92-A2782--------09/14192-----245T00 2457,(-- ACCOUNT 45,(=ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 AMT- 245.00 DESC-100 LBS. - MR. MELT VENDOR TOTAL 245.00 245.c 5535 INSTY-PRINTS 36538 10/14/92 17947 09/03/92 68.16 68.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-343000 AMT- 68.16 DESC-BUILDING APPLICATIONS 36538 10/14/92 18242 09/29/92 7.46 7.c ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-396000 AMT- 7.46 DESC-600 FLYERS VENDOR TOTAL 75.62 75.6. 5775 H V JOHNSTON CULVERT * 36539 10/14/92 0010376 09/30/92 1629.45 1629.; ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-703000 AMT- 1629.45 DESC-CSPA 49X33 SPIRAL & APRONS VENDOR TOTAL 1629.45 1629., • AGE 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER '-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW :NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT GHEE NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUF 470.OX COMMERCIAL CREDI* 36540 10/14/92 220-015863 09/21/92 67.28 67. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 AMT- 67.28 DESC-BLDG MAT. FOR LAMBERT VENDOR TOTAL 67.28 67.2 1245 LMCIT 36541 10/14/92 10/01/92 144.58 144.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 AMT- 144.58 DESC-HEALTH INS - OCTOBER VENDOR TOTAL 144.58 144.7 )603 CURTIS A LARSON APPRA* 36542 10/14/92 10/06/92 900.00 900.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 698-4121-303000 AMT- 900.00 DESC-APPRAISAL-CO RD J & CORAL SEA VENDOR TOTAL 900.00 900.1: (545 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSP* 36543 10/14/92 60376 09/30/92 331.91 331.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-341000 AMT- 331.91 DESC-LEGAL NOTICES VENDOR TOTAL 331.91 331.55 000 LORENZ BUS SERVICE, I* 36544 10/14/92 924198 09/10/92 225.00 225.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160130 AMT- 225.00 DESC-OLD LOG THEATER VENDOR TOTAL 225.00 225.0 050 MB INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY * 36545 10/14/92 20575 09/14/92 71.05 71.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-513000 AMT- 71.05 DESC-PARTS VENDOR TOTAL 71.05 71.0 1260 WA 36546 10/14/92 10/14/92 60.00 60.( OUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-363000 AMT- 60.00 DESC-SNW RDEO-GARY/TIM/LARRY/WALLY VENDOR TOTAL 60.00 60.0 080 MADSEN-JOHNSON CORPOR* 36547 10/14/92 10/14/92 140.00 140.( ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-121000 AMT- 140.00 DESC-DOUBLE BILLED 36547 10/14/92 09/22/92 60275.51 60275.` ACCOUNT NUMBER- 680-4120-705000 AMT- 29039.71 DESC-WTP #1 - PAYMENT #10 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 680-4120-705000 AMT- 31235.80 DESC-WTP #1 - PAYMENT #11 VENDOR TOTAL 60415.51 60415.` )750 MASYS CORPORATION 36548 10/14/92 4946 09/30/92 724.20 724.2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-513000 AMT- 724.20 DESC-MAINTENANCE-&SOFTWARE-LEASE VENDOR TOTAL 724.20 724.: 170 METRO WASTE CONTROL C* 36549 10/14/92 51321192 10/01/92 47837.00 47837.( ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-323000 AMT- 47837.00 DESC-NOVEMBER SEWER SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 47837.00 47837.0 444 MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOT* 36550 10/14/92 8317215 10/07/92 169.87 169.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-3912-000000 AMT- 169.87 DESC-CITY HALL POP MACHINE VENDOR TOTAL 169.87 169.E 400 MIRACLE RECREATION EQ* 36551 10/14/92 345923 09/09/92 179.17 179.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 AMT- 179.17 DESC-2-360 DEG S/P RUBBER CHAIR • BE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER '-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN IIIVENDOR TOTAL 179.17 179.1 050 N E P CORPORATION 36552 10/14/92 002644 09/23/92 6.51 6.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 6.51 DESC-FILE 36552 10/14/92 002593 09/15/92 319.65 319.6 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 79.91 DESC-MISC PARTS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 79.91 DESC-MISC PARTS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 79.91 DESC-MISC PARTS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-160000 AMT- 79.92 DESC-MI.SC PARTS VENDOR TOTAL 326.16 326.1 1500 NYSCA 36553 10/14/92 7456 09/21/92 150.00 150.0 Art'OUNT NUMPER 250-4-351-16,0024 AMT- 150.00 DESC-10-NYSCA CERTIFICATION FEES VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 150.0 ;690 NORTH STAR TURF, INC 36554 10/14/92 497240 09/15/92 110.76 110.7 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 680-4120-705000 AMT- 110.76 DESC-SEEDING TO BE REIMBURSED VENDOR TOTAL 110.76 110.7 200 NORTHERN STATES POWER* 36555 10/14/92 10/14/92 6728.53 6728.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-321000 AMT- 12.08 DESC-7840 PLEASANT VIEW DR ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-321000 AMT- 15.23 DESC-1699 - 79TH AVE NE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- .92 DESC-4901 US HWY 8 - TANK #2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-321000 AMT- 7.03 DESC-3030 HILLVIEW ROAD ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- 22.95 DESC-2408 HILLVIEW ROAD - WELL #4 41 COUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- 1119.88 DESC-2426 BRONSON DR NE OUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- 124.95 DESC-2401 HIGHWAY 10 - WELL #1 COUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- 854.12 DESC-5100 LONG LAKE ROAD ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- 827.91 DESC-2450 BRONSON DR NE - BOOSTER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- 22.19 DESC-2401 HIGHWAY 10 - WELL #2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-322000 AMT- 970.95 DESC-2401 HIGHWAY 10 - WELL #2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-322000 AMT- 14.91 DESC-2401 HIGHWAY 10 - WTP #1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-322000 AMT- 21.09 DESC-7545 GROVELAND RD - WELL #6 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-322000 AMT- 20.64 DESC-2524 BRONSON DR - WELL #2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-322000 AMT- 23.29 DESC-2450 BRONSON DR - BOOSTER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-322000 AMT- 19.76 DESC-5100 LONG LAKE RD - WELL #5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-322000 AMT- 18.00 DESC-2408 HILLVIEW RD - WELL #4 ACCOUNT-NUMBER=-730-4121=3M00---AMT- 457,73 DESC-825-1 GROVELAND-RD-STAT ON-#2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-321000 AMT- 44.61 DESC-5396 RAYMOND AVE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 770-4121-324000 AMT- 12.18 DESC-8228 SPRING LAKE-STREET LIGHT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-321000 AMT- 1006.81 DESC-2401 HIGHWAY 10 - CITY HALL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-322000 AMT- 46.21 DESC-2401 HIGHWAY 10 - CITY HALL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-321000 AMT- 3.14 DESC-2815 ARDAN AVE - SIREN ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-321000 AMT- 5.96 .DESC-2271 CO RD J W - SIREN #2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-321000 AMT- 266.53 DESC-2466 BRONSON DR - GARAGE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-322000 AMT- 114.13 DESC-2466 BRONSON DR - GARAGE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-325000 AMT- 13.34 DESC-2800 HWY 10 & SILVER LAKE RD ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-325000 AMT- 150.79 DESC-2234 HWY 10 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-325000 AMT- 120.53 DESC-5510 QUINCY STREET ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-325000 AMT- 144.17 DESC-2399 HWY 10 & CO RD H2 GE 8 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN IDOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 7.24 DESC-5324 JACKSON DR OUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 69.35 DESC-7901 GREENWOOD DR ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 6.81 DESC-2764 ARDAN AVE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 52.80 DESC-2815 ARDAN AVE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 23.01 DESC-2752 W00DCREST DR-PARK SHELTER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 240.19 DESC-2401 HWY 10 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 97.52 DESC-2710 CO RD I W ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 9.29 DESC-2330 CO RD I W ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 34.91 DESC-2815 ARDAN AVE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 84.26 DESC-2335 KNOLL DR-GREENFIELD PARK ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-321000 AMT- 18.21 DESC-5214 LONG LAKE RD ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-322000 AMT- 14.91 DESC-5324 JACKSON DR-LAMBERT PARK 36555 10/14/92 10/14/92 1565.90 1565.9 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-321000 AMT- 1565.90 DESC-7545 GROVELAND RD - WELL #6 VENDOR TOTAL 8294.43 8294.4 201 NORTHERN STATES POWER 36560 10/14/92 10/14/92 3384.08 3384.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 770-4121-324000 AMT- 3384.08 DESC-STREET LIGHTS - SEPT VENDOR TOTAL 3384.08 3384.0 588 PARK AUTO BODY 36561 10/14/92 2407 10/01/92 501.31 501.2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-513000 AMT- 501.31 DESC-REPAIR SQUAD VENDOR TOTAL 501.31 501. 45,00 PARTS COMPANY OF AMER* 36562 10/14/92 970-350456-4 09/15/92 26.38 26.2 COUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 26.38 DESC-2-VALVE STEMS/ADJ NOZZLE CONE VENDOR TOTAL 26.38 26.2 :100 PERFECT "10" CAR WASH 36563 10/14/92 061088 10/01/92 198.00 198.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-513000 AMT- 198.00 DESC-2 SEASON TICKETS VENDOR TOTAL 198.00 198.0 ;757 PITT-DES MOINES, INC. 36564 10/14/92 09/24/92 41378.20 41378.2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 680-4120-705000 AMT- 41378.20 DESC-ELEVATED WATER STORAGE TANK VENDOR TOTAL 41378.20 41378.: 9765 PITNEY BOWES INC 36565 10/14/92 456186 10/01/92 369.00 369.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER=--1004190-513000 AMT- 369-00-DESCMAINTENANCE-AGREEMENT 36565 10/14/92 456185 10/01/92 170.00 170.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-513000 AMT- 170.00 DESC-EQUIP MAINT AGREEMENT 36565 10/14/92 212751 09/16/92 206.00 206.( ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-401000 AMT- 206.00 DESC-RENTAL 10/16/92 - 01/15/93 VENDOR TOTAL 745.00 745.0 )760 RAMSEY COUNTY PTAC 36566 10/14/92 3332 09/29/92 200.00 200.( ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-363000 AMT- 200.00 DESC-DWI REFRESHER - 8 OFFICERS VENDOR TOTAL 200.00 200.( :000 RYDER STUDENT TRANSPO* 36567 10/14/92 335052 09/29/92 288.00 288.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160107 AMT- 288.00 DESC-MEGAMALL TRIP • AGE 9 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER '-C10-01 MOUNDS VIEW :NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN 0 VENDOR TOTAL 288.00 288.E 3225 SHORT ELLIOTT & HENDR* 36568 10/14/92 15086 09/25/92 1327.74 1327.7 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-705000 AMT- 1327.74 DESC-MISC ENG. CONSULTING-GREENFLD 36568 10/14/92 15011 09/24/92 211.45 211.4 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 680-4120-303000 AMT- 211.45 DESC-WATERMAIN & SEWER IMPROVEMENTS VENDOR TOTAL 1539.19 1539.1 5550 SNAP-ON TOOLS 36569 10/14/92 53-328527 09/18/92 29.35 29.2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT 29.35 DESC-B PLIER W/MUG VENDOR TOTAL 29.35 2:9.3 )2of t'.TTY OF SPRING LAKE P* 36570 10/14/92 10/14/92 392.60 392.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 392.60. DESC-SEWER BILLING VENDOR TOTAL 392.60 392.6 )900 STATE TREASURER FUND 36571 10/14/92 F 32450 09/15/92 32.00 32.( ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-160000 AMT- 32.00 DESC-DESK & PARTITION VENDOR TOTAL 32.00 32.0 )990 STEPANIAK CONSTRUCTIO* 36572 10/14/92 1288 08/08/92 1442.50 1442.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-515000 AMT- 1442.50 DESC-REPAIR WATER LEAK-5080 SLUR LK VENDOR TOTAL 1442.50 1442.5 5850 TOOL WAREHOUSE, INC 36573 10/14/92 64077 09/22/92 99.36 99.2 000UNT NUMBER- 700-4121-513000 AMT- 99.36 DESC-MISC PARTS VENDOR TOTAL 99.36 99.2 ?750 ULRICH, MICHAEL 36574 10/14/92 10/14/92 36.89 36.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-363000 AMT- 24.95 DESC-MSSA EXPENSES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-363000 AMT- 11.94 DESC-TRAINING MEETING VENDOR TOTAL 36.89 36.E 5000 UNITOG RENTALS SYSTEM 36575 10/14/92 2832740928 09/28/92 98.98 98.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-240000 AMT- 98.98 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL 36575 10/14/92 2832740921 09/21/92 99.22 99.2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-240000 AMT- 99.22 DESC-UNIFORM RENTAL VENDOR-TOTAL 1987.20 193.2 3000 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRI* 36576 10/14/92 M21481 09/18/92 110.00 110.( ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-303000 AMT- 110.00 DESC-INSPECTION SERVICE CONTRACT VENDOR TOTAL 110.00 110.( )006 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCT* 36577 10/14/92 443354H-H 09/23/92 174.13 174.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 174.13 DESC-10 MARKER FLAGS & 1 KNEE BOOT VENDOR TOTAL 174.13 174.1 )700 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BL* 36578 10/14/92 223050 09/23/92 714.62 714.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-353000 AMT- 104.37 DESC-OCTOBER REFUSE COLLECTION ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-353000 AMT- 161.66 DESC-OCTOBER REFUSE COLLECTION 0 aGE 10 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER )-C10-0'1 MOUNDS VIEW =NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUt . DONT NUMBER- 100-4360-354000 AMT- 328.24 DESC-OCTOBER REFUSE COLLECTION OUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-160208 AMT- 120.35 DESC-OCTOBER REFUSE COLLECTION VENDOR TOTAL 714.62 714.r- 850 WEINBLATT AND DAVIS 36579 10/14/92 10/14/92 42.15 42.' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4160-301000 AMT- 42.15 DESC-LEGAL SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 42.15 42.1 ?020 WHITESELL TREE SERVIC* 36580 10/14/92 09/14/92 867.50 867.` ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4450=352000 AMT- 220.00 DESC-TREE REMOVAL ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-354000 AMT- 647.50 DESC-TREE REMOVAL VENDOR TOTAL 867.50 867.1 ?500 ZEDS INTERNATIONAL 36581 10/14/92 66347 09/22/92 2331.29 2331. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-703000 AMT- 2331.29 DESC-486 COMPUTER SYSTEM VENDOR TOTAL 2331.29 2331.: 1.600 ZIEGLER INC 36582 10/14/92 8C14212A 09/18/92 45.50 45.` ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-513000 AMT- 45.50 DESC-8 GASKETS 36582 10/14/92 8C13287A 09/17/92 168.71 168.7 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-513000 AMT- 168.71 DESC-ADAPTER, GASKET, & SEAL-O-R 36582 10/14/92 8C13628A 09/17/92 4.11 4.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-513000 AMT- 4.11 DESC-GASKET 36582 10/14/92 8C13996 09/17/92 152.24 152.: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-513000 AMT- 152.24 DESC-MISC PARTS 36582 10/14/92 8C16353 09/25/92 139.37 139.:: 4WOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-513000 AMT- 139.37 DESC-MISC PARTS 36582 10/14/92 8C15568A 09/23/92 1158.23 1158.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-513000 AMT- 1158.23 DESC-6 TRANSFORMR & 1 MAGETO A 36582 10/14/92 8C15484A 09/23/92 52.08 52.( ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-513000 AMT- 52.08 DESC-2 REGULATORS & 2 GASKETS VENDOR TOTAL 1720.24 1720.: GRAND TOTAL 191535.32 191535.:_ GE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER -C10-02 MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN 31 & M UPHOLSTERY 37808 09/23/92 09/23/92 137.80 137.6 OUNT NUMBER- 697-4121-303000 AMT- 137.80 DESC-UPHOLSTERY (WAITING BENCHES) VENDOR TOTAL 137.80 137.6 313 LARRY BEACH CONSTRUCT* 37809 09/24/92 09/24/92 4800.00 4800.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-2305-000000 AMT- 4800.00 DESC-REFUND-STREET OPENING DEPOSIT VENDOR TOTAL 4800.00 4800.0 312 MINNESOTA GIS/LIS CON* 37810 09/24/92 09/24/92 55.00 55.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-363000 AMT- 55.00 DESC-MN GIS/LIS CONF - HARRINGTON 37811 09/24/92 09/24/92 125.00 125.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-363000 AMT- 62.50 DESC-MN GIS/LIS CONF-HESS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-363000 AMT- 62.50 DESC-MN GIS/LIS CONF-HESS VENDOR TOTAL 180.00 180.0 315 MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS * 37812 09/25/92 09/25/92 25.00 25.C' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-361000 AMT- 25.00 DESC-DUES VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 25.0 000 HICKOK, KITTY 37813 09/25/92 09/25/92 87.00 87.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-380000 AMT- 28.00 DESC-MILEAGE - BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-363000. AMT- 59.00 DESC-MILEAGE - USER GROUP MEETING VENDOR TOTAL 87.00 87.0 050 AEC - ENGINEERS & DES* 37814 09/28/92 5423 09/15/92 628.20 628.E iiiCOUNT NUMBER- 680-4120-303000 AMT- 628.20 DESC-COATING INSPECTION 500 MG EWT VENDOR TOTAL 628.20 628.E 075 EVERGREEN LAND SERVIC* 37815 09/28/92 09/28/92 705.43 705.4 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 499-4121-303000 AMT- 705.43 DESC-CONSULTING VENDOR TOTAL 705.43 705.4 300 SILVER LAKE WOODS ASS* 37816 09/28/92 09/28/92 750.00 750.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 499-4121-705000 AMT- 750.00 DESC-EASEMENT-CLIFF ASH/2664 LK CT VENDOR TOTAL 750.00 750.0 303 FISHER, SCOTT & KAREN 37817 09/28/92 09/28/92 600.00 600.0 ACCOUNT-NUMBER-499=4421705000 AMT- 600.-00 DESC--EASEMENT-8425-GREENWOOD-DRIVE VENDOR TOTAL 600.00 600.0 306 NELSON, NEIL 37818 09/28/92 09/28/92 300.00 300.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 499-4121-705000 AMT 300.00 DESC-EASEMENT-83:34 LONG LAKE ROAD VENDOR TOTAL 300.00 300.0 301 BESEMER, CURIE & LYLE 37819 09/28/92 09/28/92 830.00 830.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 499-4121-705000 AMT- 830.00 DESC-EASEMENT-8466 LONG LAKE ROAD VENDOR TOTAL 830.00 830.0 '309 O'HAGEN, EDNA 37820 09/28/92 09/28/92 350.00 350.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 499-4121-705000 AMT- 350.00 DESC-EASEMENT-5046 LONG LAKE ROAD AGE 2, ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER '-C10-02 MOUNDS VIEW :NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN • VENDOR TOTAL 350.00 350.0 0307 NORDSTROM, RUSSELL 37821 09/28/92 09/28/92 375.00 375.0: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 499-4121-705000 AMT- 375.00 DESC-EASEMENT-2536 WEST CO. RD H2 VENDOR TOTAL 375.00 375.0 0310 ROLFER, NYLE & DARLEN* 37822 09/28/92 09/28/92 250.00 250.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 499-4121-705000 AMT- 250.00 DESC-EASEMENT-7945 LONG LAKE ROAD VENDOR TOTAL 250.00 250.0 0305 JOSLYN, MARCIA & GEOR* 37823 09/28/92 09/28/92 150.00 150.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 499-4121-705000 AMT- 150.00 DESC-EASEMENT - 7700 LONG ROAD VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 150.0 0302 CHAIKA, JOANN 37824 09/28/92 09/28/92 150.00 150.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 499-4121-705000 AMT- 150.00 DESC-EASEMENT-5084 LONG LAKE ROAD VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 150.0 0308 OBLENDER, LEO & MARY * 37825 09/28/92 09/28/92 150.00 150.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 499-4121-705000 AMT- 150.00 DESC-EASEMENT VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 150.0 0304 JOHNSON, JAMES 37826 09/28/92 09/28/92 150.00 150.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 499-4121-705000 AMT- 150.00 DESC-EASEMENT VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 150.0 91•STERN BANK 37827 09/28/92 09/28/92 100.00 100.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-363000 AMT- 100.00 DESC-OPEN REGULAR ACCOUNT 37828 09/28/92 09/28/92 100.00 100.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-010000 AMT- 100.00 DESC-OPEN PAYROLL ACCOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 200.00 200.0 5940 GOVERNMENT TRAINING S* 37829 09/28/92 09/28/92 95.00 95.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-363000 AMT- 95.00 DESC-SYMPOSIUM - BRAGER VENDOR TOTAL 95.00 95.0 ?311 KURTZ, HELEN 37830 09/28/92 09/28/92 10.00 10.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352130 AMT- 10.00 DESC-REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 10.00 10.( )099 MIELKE, RICHARD & BAR* 37831 09/28/92 09/28/92 250.00 250.2: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-705000 AMT- 250.00 DESC-7955 LONG LAKE ROAD VENDOR TOTAL 250.00 250.0 p214 MINNTERTAINMENT COMPAQ- 37832 09/28/92 09/28/92 932.40 932.L ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160107 AMT- 932.40 DESC-MALL OF AMERICA TOUR (9/29) VENDOR TOTAL. 932.40 932.x. 5200 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REV* 37833 09/29/92 09/29/92 3531.00 3531.(- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-3476-000000 . AMT- 3531..00 DESC-MINN WATER CONNECTION FEE(6/30 • GE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER -C10-02 MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN • VENDOR TOTAL 3531.00 3531.0 316 ROBERT'S ROOFING & RE* 37834 09/29/92 09/29/92 35.00 35.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-3331-000000 AMT- 35.00 DESC-DIF BETWEEN CITY LIC & LIC CK VENDOR TOTAL 35.00 35.0 202 NORTHERN STATES POWER 37835 09/29/92 09/29/92 371.00 371.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 770-4121-705000 AMT- 371.00 DESC-7452 KNOLLWOOD DRIVE VENDOR TOTAL 371.00 371.0 318 BEAVER PLUMBING 37837 09/30/92 09/30/92 630.00 630.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-2305-000000 ANT- 630.00 DESC-REFUND STREET OPENING DEPOSIT VENDOR TOTAL 630.00 630.0 636 FIRSTAR NEW BRIGHTON * 37838 10/02/92 10/02/92 67521.13 67521.1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-010000 ANT- 1488.75 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-010000 AMT- 3533.45 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-020000 ANT- 720.00 DESC-10/02%92 -- GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-010000 AMT- 1683.19 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4140-020000 AMT- 1859.25 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-010000 ANT- 3880.46 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-010000 ANT- 2478.98 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-010000 ANT- 811.48 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-020000 AMT- 418.95 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-010000 ANT- 23983.09 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS IliOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-011000 AMT- 240.79 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS OUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-020000 ANT- 887.81 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS COUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-010000 AMT- 477.52 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-020000 ANT- 410.00 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-010000 AMT 1141.60 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-011000 AMT- 149.84 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-010000 ANT- 2785.20 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-011000 ANT- 251.82 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-010000 ANT- 3160.83 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-010000 AMT 2238.40 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-020000 AMT- 377.00 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020002 ANT- 78.00 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT`NUMBER=250-4351 020011 AM-T-- 2547.75 DESC-10-/02/-9 GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4.351-020042 AMT- 214.04 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020260 AMT- 145.30 DESC-10/02/92 GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020130 ANT- 137.41 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020260 AMT- 392.30 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-020260 ANT- 145.30 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020229 AMT- 41.50 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020231 AMT- 14.00 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020233 AMT- 69.50 DESC-10/02/92 _- GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020237 ANT- 28.00 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020238 ANT- 28.00 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020239 ANT- 14.00 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020241 AMT- 28.00 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS 0 GE 4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER -C10-02 MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN IllOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020244 AMT- 14.00 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS OUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020253 AMT- 56.00 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020254 AMT- 28.00 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020255 AMT- 56.00 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020256 AMT- 42.00 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020260 AMT- 145.30 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-020000 AMT- 498.52 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-010000 AMT- 480.00 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-010000 AMT- 2445.24 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-010000 AMT- 2260.80 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- . 700-4121-011000 AMT- 687.69 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-020000 AMT- 822.45 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-010000 AMT- 2445.24 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-010000 AMT- 2260.80 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-011000 AMT- 421.38 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-020000. AMT- 289.20 DESC-10/02/92 - GROSS 37839 10/02/92 10/02/92 3141.65 3141./ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-030000 AMT- 39.60 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-030000 AMT- 263.72 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-030000 AMT 103.11 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4140-030000 AMT- 115.28 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-030000 AMT- 218.58 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-030000 AMT- 147.09 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER-, 100-4190-030000 AMT- 76.28 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-030000 AMT- 123.49 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA 41 COUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-030000 AMT- 25.42 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA OUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-030000 AMT- 77.79 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA COUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-030000 AMT- 177.54 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-030000 AMT- 179.49 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-030000 AMT- 153.31 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-030000 AMT- 42.91 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-030000 AMT- 32.84 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-030000 AMT- 9.01 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-030000 AMT- 34.98 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-030000 AMT- 30.90 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-030000 AMT- 29.76 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-030000 AMT- 112.25 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4421-030000 AM-T- 221.-90 DE-SG-- 0!02/92 - F-ICA. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-030000 AMT- 112.25 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-030000 AMT- . 177.10 DESC-10/02/92 - FICA ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-031000 AMT- 17.61 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-031000 AMT- 61.68 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-031000 AMT- 24.11 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4140-031000 AMT- 26.96 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-031000 AMT- 51.12 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-031000 AMT- 34.40 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-031000 . AMT- 17.84 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-031000 AMT= 71.79 DESC=10/02/92=-MEDICARE.- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-031000 AMT- 5.95 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-031000 AMT- 18.19 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE GE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER -C10-02 MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN OUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-031000 AMT- 41.53 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE OUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-031000 AMT- 41.98 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-031000 AMT- 35.87 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-031000 AMT- 10.05 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-031000 AMT- 7.68 DESC-10/02/92- MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-031000 AMT- 2.11 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-031000 AMT- 8.18 DESC-10/02/92 MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-031000 AMT- 7.23 DESC-10/02/92 MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-031000 AMT- 6.96 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-031000 AMT- 26.24 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-031000 AMT- 51.89 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-031000 AMT- 26.25 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-031000 AMT- 41.43 DESC-10/02/92 - MEDICARE VENDOR TOTAL 70662.78 70662.7 970 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, IN* 37839 10/02/92 10/02/92 8485.34 8485._ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-040000 AMT- 356.76 DESC-HEALTH INS PREMIUM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-040000 AMT- 65.38 DESC-HEALTH INS PREMIUM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-040000 AMT- 708.25 DESC-HEALTH INS PREMIUM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-040000 AMT- 393.13 DESC-HEALTH INS PREMIUM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-040000 AMT- 130.76 DESC-HEALTH INS PREMIUM -OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-040000 AMT- 283.30 DESC-HEALTH INS PREMIUM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 AMT- 3154.44 DESC-HEALTH INS PREMIUM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-040000 AMT- 662.92 DESC-HEALTH INS PREMIUM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-040000 AMT- 70.84 -DESC-HEALTH INS PREMIUM - OCTOBER OUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-040000 AMT- 566.60 DESC-HEALTH INS PREMIUM - OCTOBER OUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-040000 AMT- 283.30 DESC-HEALTH INS PREMIUM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-040000 AMT- 414.49 DESC-HEALTH INS PREMIUM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-040000 AMT 566.60 DESC-HEALTH. INS PREMIUM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-040000 AMT- 414.51 DESC-HEALTH INS PREMIUM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-040000 AMT- 414.06 DESC-HEALTH INS PREMIUM - OCTOBER VENDOR TOTAL 8485.34 8485.2 !020 MEDICA 37841 10/02/92 10/02/92 976.50 976.5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4.120-040000 AMT- 173.30 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-040000 AMT- 173.30. DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4.130-040000 AMT- 173.30 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT-NUMBER 100-4200=040000 AMT- 17330 DES HEALTH-INS PREM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-040000 AMT- 283.30 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - OCTOBER VENDOR TOTAL 976.50 976.5 !000 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLA* 37842 10/02/92 10/02/92 342.85 342.:. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 AMT 130.80 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-040000 AMT- 106.02 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-040000 AMT- 106.03 DESC-HEALTH INS PREM - OCTOBER VENDOR TOTAL 342.85 342.E ;700 COMMERICAL LIFE INSUR* 37843 10/02/92 10/02/92 347.20 347.: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-041000 AMT- 35.30 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-041000 AMT- 22.65 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER GE 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER -C10-02 MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN IROUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-041000 AMT- 4.25 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER OUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-041000 AMT- 10.73 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-041000 AMT- 45.70 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-041000 AMT- 1.70 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-041000 AMT- 96.68 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-041000 AMT- 3.98 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-041000 AMT- .42 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-041000 AMT- 3.40 DE5C-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-041000 AMT- 3.40 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-041000 AMT- 44.90 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-041000 AMT- 4.25 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-041000 AMT- 44.89 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-041000 AMT- 23.25 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-041000 AMT- 1.70 DESC-LIFE INS FOR OCTOBER VENDOR TOTAL 347.20 347.2 970 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, IN* 37843 10/02/92 10/02/92 247.33 247.ti_ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-042000 AMT- 47.90 DESC-DENTAL INS PREM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-042000 AMT- 18.13 DESC-DENTAL INS PREM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-042000 AMT- 27.19 DESC-DENTAL INS PREM_ - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-042000 AMT- 15.24 DESC-DENTAL INS PREM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-042000 AMT- 108.78 DESC-DENTAL INS PREM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-042000 AMT- 15.05 DESC-DENTAL INS PREM - OCTOBER ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-042000 AMT- 15.04 DESC-DENTAL INS PREM - OCTOBER VENDOR TOTAL 247.33 247._ 90B EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 37845 10/02/92 10/02/92 42.50 42.` COUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-035000 . AMT- 42.50 DESC-DEFINED CONTRIBUTIONS-OCTOBER VENDOR TOTAL 42.50 42. 300 U S POSTMASTER 37846 10/01/92 10/01/92 93.00 93.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-330000 AMT- 93.00 DESC-POSTAGE VENDOR TOTAL 93.00 93.c 919 WESTERN BANK 37847 10/01/92 10/01/92 400.00 400.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-396000 AMT- 400.00 DESC-RECYCLING AWARD VENDOR TOTAL 400.00 400.c 900 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 37848 10/02/92 10/02/92 4603.74 4603.E ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-033000 AMT- 190.56 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-033000 AMT- 75.40 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-033000 AMT- 173.85 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-033000 AMT- 111.06 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-033000 AMT- 36.35 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-033000 AMT- 89.23 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-034000 AMT- 2768.85 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- . 100-4230-034000 AMT- 57.30 DESC-PENSIONS-10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-033000 AMT- 18.37 DESC=PENSIONS - 10/02-/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-033000 AMT- 57.86 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-033000 AMT- 136.05 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 aGE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER ,-C10-02 MOUNDS VIEW :NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUt 411tOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-033000 AMT- 141.60 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 OUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-033000 AMT- 100.28 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-033000 AMT- 6.51 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-033000 AMT- 6.51 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-033000 AMT- 6.51 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-033000 AMT- 6.51 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-033000 AMT- 18.46 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-033000 AMT- 21.50 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-032000 AMT- 51.37 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-033000 AMT- 88.10 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-033000 AMT- 168.93 DESC-PENSIONS 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-032000 AMT- 51.36 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-033000 AMT- 88.10 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-033000 AMT- 133.12 DESC-PENSIONS - 10/02/92 VENDOR TOTAL 4603.74 4603 3545 SILUK, LARRY 37849 10/02/92 10/02/92 125.00 125.( ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-363000 AMT- 125.00 DESC-TRAINING - SILUK VENDOR TOTAL 125.00 125.c 1072 RAINBOW FOODS 37850 10/02/92 10/02/92 54.00 54.0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160107 AMT- 54.00 DESC-MUFFINS FOR MORTON TRIP VENDOR TOTAL 54.00 54.( )116 OAK BROOK HILLS 37851 10/05/92 10/05/92 115.00 115.1 : COUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-362000 AMT- 115.00 DESC-CONFERENCE-SAARION VENDOR TOTAL 115.00 115.0 GRAND TOTAL 103168.07 103168.( • Agenda Section: 8.B ©mos REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92—i98C STAFF REPORT CounciReportl Action: 10-8-92 nil( Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE October 13, 1992 ❑ Public Hearings ID Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Adopt Resolution No. 4288 Approving a Wage Adjustment for Kitty Hickok, Payroll Clerk Administrator's Review/Recommendation: \--- /.„ - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets ga'neeessery) SUMMARY: On October 14, 1992, Kitty Hickok, the City's Payroll Clerk, will have been employed with the City of Mounds View for four and one half years. In accordance with the City's 5 Step Compensation Policy, this position is scheduled for a wage adjustment. Ms. Hickok is currently at Step 4, which is $2269 . 14 per month. Her performance has been satisfactory and staff is recommending a wage adjustment to Step 5, $2388.57 per month. This adjustment is consistent with the 5 Step Pay Plan for this position. #1-iik 1 Tim Cruikshank, Management Assistant RECOMMENDATION; Motion to waive the reading and adopt resolution No. 4288 approving a wage adjustment for Kitty Hickok, Payroll Clerk. RESOLUTION NO. 4288 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A WAGE ADJUSTMENT FOR KITTY HICKOK CITY PAYROLL CLERK WHEREAS, Kitty Hickok is a regular full-time employee who began working for the City of Mounds View on February 16, 1988; and WHEREAS, Ms. Hickok's work performance has met the responsibilities of Payroll Clerk as outlined in the Payroll Clerk job description; and WHEREAS, her work performance has been satisfactorily reflected in her annual performance review; and WHEREAS, a Step 5 wage adjustment that is consistent with the City's compensation policy is recommended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council hereby approve a wage adjustment for Kitty Hickok from $2269 . 14/month to $2388 .57/month effective 10/14/92 . Presented this 13th day of October, 1992 (SEAL) Jerry Linke, Mayor (ATTEST-) Samantha Orduno, City Administrator Agenda Section: 8.C ©UGJO� REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-399C Report Date: 10-8-92 friu STAFF REPORT Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business October 13, 1992 ❑ Public Hearings CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE ® Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Staff Car Replacements 1 Administrator's Review/Recommendation: ' - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY: The sale of the surplus police cars resulted in $6,000 being available for the replacement of the current staff cars. The 2 staff cars are anticipated to yield an additional $2,500 to $3 ,000. Review of State bids for new vehicles indicates that a minimum of $9,500 would be needed for 1 staff car. Staff has also checked with fleet sales (Avis) and found that the best price is currently $8,400 for a 1992 Dodge Spirit. A possible option would be to purchase used vehicles through a dealer. In accordance with Council discussion on October 5, 1992, staff recommends the purchase of 2 used cars for staff vehicles. The cars would be in the Cavalier Spirit - Tiempo class and the total cost would not exceed $20,000. 1 s Ri -4:--c 'ne or City Engineer/Director of Public Works RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends the Council authorize purchase of 2 cars at a cost not to exceed $20,000, to be funded from acct. no. 100-4260-704 and a transfer of additional funds as necessary from acct. no. 100-4500-910 to acct. no. 100-4260-704. 3:77 37 Agenda Section: 8.D owns REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-4000 STAFF REPORT Report Date: 1 —8-9 ni �� Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE October 13, 1992 ❑ Public Hearings 1 Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Resolution No. 4289 - Requesting an Increase in the City's Municipal S ate Aid Street Designation Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Expl2Datinn/Si1mmary (attach supplement sheets as necessary) SUMMARY; A review of the jurisdictional roads within the County was ini- tiated as a result of the Ramsey County study on consolidation of government services. The study indicated that there are some County roads that could be turned back to City jurisdiction in Mounds View. The roads suggested to be turned back to Mounds View are : _ ROAD LIMITS County Road H-2 W. County Line to TH 10 County Road I W. County Line to Silver Lake Road Pleasant View Drive Co. Road H-2 to Co. Road I Spring Lake Road Co. Road H-2 to N. County Line This is a total of 3 . 63 miles of road to be assumed by Mounds View. The County would continue to have jurisdiction over Silver Lake Road, County Road I west of Silver Lake Road, County Road H, and Long Lake Road totaling 5.81 miles. The County is suggesting to the State that if the proposed road turnbacks are to occur, the City should be given additional Municipal State Aid miles to offset the financial burden imposed from the State mandated consolidation plan. Attached is Resolution No. 4289 an increase in the percentage of Municipal State Aid Street designation in Mounds View. Ric inetor City Engineer/Director of Public Works 1ECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends Council approval of this resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 4289 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN INCREASE IN THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROAD SYSTEM DESIGNATION TO 25% OF THE CITY'S ROAD SYSTEM WHEREAS, THE 1992 Minnesota Legislature established a Ramsey County Local Government Services Study Commission (RCLGSSC) to "report on the advantages and disadvantages of sharing, cooperating, restructuring, or conslidating. . . " activities in five areas of public service including: public health, attorney's functions as they relate to criminal law, libraries, public works, and police communications, crime lab and investigative functions; and WHEREAS, the composition of the twenty-five member commission was diverse, including a balance of public and private, and St. Paul and suburban interests; and WHEREAS, the Commission's recommendations concerning public works includes adoption of a plan for functional consolidation of roadways within Ramsey County; and WHEREAS, the Consolidation Plan provides for reclassification of roadways and corresponding changes in jurisdiction including trunk highway turnbacks from the State to Ramsey County and transfer of local and State Aid roadways between the County and municipalities; and WHEREAS, the Plan also provides $3 . 13 million for the improvement of roadways to acceptable levels prior to transferring-lurisd ction-overroadway-sagme-nt-s-€rom-Ramsey County to municipalities; and WHEREAS, the Plan also provides for establishment of appropriate County State Aid Highway and Municipal. State Aid designations; and WHEREAS, the Plan causes operations, maintenance, service, and financial impacts to municipalities within Ramsey County. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Mounds View requests that the Commissioner of Transportation increase the portion of its municipal roadway system that is eligible for RESOLUTION NO. 4289 PAGE TWO Municipal State Aid (MSA) designation to 25% to accomodate the additional mileage placed under its jurisdiction as a result of the Consolidation Plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View requests that the Commissioner of Transportation grant a variance regarding proposed consolidation initiatives which allows removal of raodways from the MSA system without incurring penalitiPs sPt forth in governing MSA rules. Adopted this 13th day of October, 1992 . ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) City Administrator Agenda Section: 8.F. fir REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-401C STAFF REPORT ReportDate:Council Action: 1n—R-9p O Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE October 8, 19 92 • Public Hearings 7 Consent Agenda O Council Business Item Description: Resolution No. 4287 Ratifying the Appointment of Election Judges for the General/Municipal Election Administrator's Review/Recommendation: -No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY: Please find attached Resolution No. 4287 Ratifying the Appointment of Election Judges for the General/Municipal Election. • / '--- /fr.)/ / deil-e*Yrik) Mic' ele Severson, Deputy Clerk RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 4287 RESOLUTION NO. 4287 COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE GENERAL/MUNICIPAL ELECTION WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View is required by law to o • a Genera 'unic1pa ec 10 , WHEREAS, any individual who is eligible to vote in an election precinct is qualified to be appointed as an election judge for that precinct; and WHEREAS, no more than half of the election judges in a precinct may be members of the same political party; and WHEREAS, all proposed election judges listed on the attached sheet have meet all of the State qualifications for the position of election judge. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ratify the appointment of election judges made by the Mayor on October 13 , 1992. Said appointments are attached. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View authorizes the Clerk-Administrator to appoint an election judge where there is a vacancy, if necessary. Adopted this 13 day of October, 1992 . ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) CIerk=Admi n i-str a t ar - ELECTION JUDGES 1992 GENERAL ELECTION MOUNDS VIEW Kathy MacRunnels IR General Chair Alice Frits DFL Co-chair IR June Schleiss IR Victoria Crowe IR Janet Strauss IR Susan Thymian IR Judy Peterson IR Inga Kelner IR Pat Coffey IR Jayne DeJong IR Marilyn Brick IR DFL Marlene Meyer DFL Sandy Huebener DFL Lynda McKenzie DFL Sharry Nelson DFL Dorothy Wilhaus DFL Amy Hodges DFL Rose Nejedly DFL Inez Isbell DFL Sharon Mathson DFL - �lirAgenda Section: 8.F owns REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-4020 Report Date: 10-8-92 STAFF REPORT Council Action: �Un ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE October 13. 1992 0 Public Hearings El Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: Approval of Position Classifications Administrator's Review/Recommendation: -No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; The request for consideration of three position reclassifications are presented for Council approval. The positions recommended for reclassification are: Maintenance Receptionist Planning Technician Public Works Foreman The criteria used for reclassifications are: 1. Have the duties and responsibilities of the position substantially changed in terms of degree of complexity and scope of diversity and/or 2 . Are the duties and responsibilities of the position consistent with the complexity, diversity and accountability of a higher ranked position? Receptionist Review of the duties an• response•i i - . - • he Ma-in-tennnee Receptionist clearly indicate a substantial disparity in the duties and responsibilities of a similar position (City Hall Receptionist) . The duties performed by the Maintenance Receptionist are more consistent with the Stanton classification Secretary B or "Division Secretary" . It is recommended that this position be reclassified from Receptionist to Division Secretary. The proposed compensation Step 5 plan for the reclassified position is: Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5. 9. 20/hr 9 .77/hr 10. 35/hr 10. 92/hr 11.50/hr (continued on next page) . 414‘"?-1 ( RECOMMENDATION; - Orduno, Cit Administrator Motion to approve Position Classfications as provided. Effective date October 14, 1992 . To be charged against 100-4120-975. STAFF REPORT PAGE TWO OCTOBER 13 , 1992 It is recommended that the position be reclassified at Step 3 with advancement to Step 4 in 1 year, Step 5 in two years (each upon satisfactory performance) . Current compensation rate is $ 9 .77/hr. Planning Technician - - - . . .. - mentioned earlier: . the duties have changed in complexity and scope of diversity and the duties currently performed are more consistent with the duties and responsibilities of a City Planner (Stanton Classification #161) . It is recommended that this position be reclassified to City Planner with the following Step 5 Plan: Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 30, 160 32, 045 33 , 930 35, 815 37 , 700 Current compensation rate is $28, 366 per year. It is recommended that the position be reclassified at Step 1 with advancement to Step 2 (with satisfactory performance) at six months, Step 3 at 1 year, Step 4 at 2 years and Step 5 at year 3 . Public Works Foreman This position meets #2 of the previously established criteria for reclassification. The scope of responsibility, diversity and complexity of duties is beyond the duties exemplified by a classification of foreman. One of the "tests" for reclassification to a higher ranked supervisory level position is the degree to which the person consistently exhibits discretionary judgement decisions, condoms analysis of data/needs/activities, determines options and independently selects a course of action (within the scope of position accountability. Another test is the diversity of responsibility. A Public Works Foreman rarely supervises a multi-functional crew. The scope of responsibility is generally limited to a single "division" -- streets, water, sewer. The duties and responsibilities of the current foreman are consistent with and more representative of a higher ranked supervisory position. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 37, 680 40, 035 42 , 390 44, 745 47, 100 mmmw STAFF REPORT PAGE THREE OCTOBER 13, 1992 It is recommended that the Public Works Foreman be reclassified as a Public Works Supervisor with the following Step 5 Plan: Current compensation is $41, 828. It is further recommended that the position be reclassified at Step 3 with adjustments to Step 4 in 1 year, Step 5 in 2 years contingent upon a satisfactory performance. It should be noted that all position reclassifications are subject to a 6 month probationary period. ° Agenda Section: 9.A 11 111796REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-403CReport Date: 10-8-92 � STAFF REPORT Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE October 13, 1992 ❑ Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda Ea Council Business Item Description: Consideration of Resolution No. 4290 Approving/Denying the Sign Area Variance Request by Paster Enterprises for the Property Located at 2577 Highway 10, Planning Case 350-92 Administrator's Review/Recommendation: frrvjC - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; Paster Enterprises, representing Budget Liquor, has made application for a variance to allow for signage in excess of City allowed size requirements at 2577 Highway 10 (Mounds View Square) . Chapter 39 of the Mounds View Municipal Code allows for up to 100 square feet of sign area per business occupant in the form of a wall sign. The applicant has proposed two(2) signs - each approximately 185 square feet in area - to be located on the South and West sides of the building. The plans indicate that both signs will be illuminated. Staff has reviewed the proposal against other sections of the Municipal Code and found the request to be in compliance with all applicable requirements other than those governing the aforementioned variance. The Mounds View Planning Commission, at a special October 1, 1992 meeting, reviewed and denied the request as proposed. At this time, the applicant is exercising his right of appeal of that decision to the City Council as allowed by the Municipal Code. I have included a copy of all materials received as a part of the application. In addition, I have included a copy of City Council Resolution No. 4290 for your r . -0 = - - . -ase note that the resolution is an "either\or" resolution and can either approve or deny the request based upon review of the applicant's proposal. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. (: / / ice Paul Harrington, City Planner RECOMMENDATION; Adopt City Council Resolution No. 4290 with appropriate language. RESOLUTION NO. 4290 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING\DENYING THE SIGN AREA VARIANCE REQUEST BY PASTER ENTERPRISES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2577 HIGHWAY 10, PLANNING CASE NO. 350-92 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission reviewed the request of Paster Enterprises for a variance to allow the •lacement of a• •roximately 370 square feet of sign area at 2577 Highway 10 where only 10$ square ee is a ow- . • s b • Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission applied the criteria used to evaluate all variance requests; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission denied the request in Resolution No. 345-92; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Municipal Code allows for the appeal of denied variance requests at the City Council level; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the request as proposed against the criteria used to evaluate all variance requests. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves\denies the variance request of Paster Enterprises for the placement of 370 square feet of sign area at 2577 Highway 10 based on the following finding(s) of fact: 1. 2. 3. Adopted this 13th day of October, 1992. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Elerk-Adminis ra o CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION APPLICANT: PA57 , -AITERMtsgc.5 Phone C4Q-79o) ADDRESS: 2727 V0114 Ai/Er 57E'A'U r'/ M ), SSJ 14 Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code Interest in Property (check appropriate box): Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee, Operator, Manager ❑ Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other (explain) Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before final City action of this request PROPERTY INVOLVED: Address/General Location 0-577 /V O U/UQS (J JET) .59V4 13i)t1E7- 2 /QU0/2 Legal Description or Property Identification Number o oo/ Legal Owner: Name/Address Present Use (check appropriate box): ❑ UndevelopedNacant ❑ Single Family Dwelling ❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling • ❑ Multi-Family (No. of Units ) Business/Commercial Establishment ❑ Industrial Establishment ❑ Other (explain) Property Classification: 0 Abstract ❑ Torrens REQUEST: WE REQ L)E5T A V R)A1cg 7?) 72� of 7) Jc6 ,4 1-1_6a) /ok A *Please note: Applicant may be responsible for additional fe- - • '- -- - -•• of this. rePu,es+ I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUE. L, S- Z.S SZ Signature *********************************************************** ****************************** Rezoning $200/acre,minimum$200,maximum$1,000 - Fund Dedication Fee Variance R-1 to R-2-$75,all others$200 late Paid Conditional Use Permit R-1 to R-2-$75,all others$200 Receipt Number Code Appeal $75 �� Develop./Site Plan Review $100/acre,minimum 100,maximum$500 -TotaarFees F}afid- Minor Subdivision $150 Date Paid 9-.25- Major Subdivision $250 plus $250 deposit Receipt Number Comp. Plan Amendment $200 Wetland Alteration Permit $50 plus deposit determined by Staff Additional Fee Paid Wetland Buffer Permit $10 Date Paid Planning Sign $50 Receipt Number PUD $350 PUD Amendment $150 Date of final action /� q APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED Date % -as- ! y Planning Case No. 3S O ?2� Admin.Account No. 11 ft SEP 28 ' 92 8: 22 FROM PASTER ENTERPRISES PAGE . 002 -te I/I I€ 22227 University DEVELOPMENT Ave.AND MANAGEMENT 36122F.5646-79001• Fax 6 G 2-389 September 25, 1992 CENTRAL PLAZA 45th&Central Ave.N.E Minneapolis,Minnesota . Ms. Samantha Orduno City Administrator CRYSTAL SHOPPING CENTER City of Mounds View Bass Lake Road&West Broadway Administrative Offices Crystal,Minnesota 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 DODDWAY SHOPPING CENTER Dodd Road&Bernard Street Re: Moundsview Square Shopping Center West St.Paul,Minnesota Signage Variance Request FARMINGTON MALL Dear Ms. Orduno: S.Hwy.50&S.Hwy.3 Farmington,Minnesota This letter is a request, on behalf of the tenants located int e Moundsview Square Shopping Center, for a variance in the sign criteria LEXINGTON PLAZA SHOPPES for the City of Mounds View. Lexington&Larpenteur Roseville,Minnesota We have just completed a major, exterior remodeling of Moundsview Square which upgrades the appearance significantly of the shopping MENDOTA PLAZA center property. Our anchor tenants at the center are asking the City State Hwy.110&Dodd Road Mendota Heights,Minnesota of Mounds View for assistance in getting the best signage visibility possible in the marketplace. There is significant competitive pressure coming from shopping center properties located north on Highway 10 MOUNDSVIEW SQUARE Hwy.10&Long Lake Road in Blaine and the Northtown area. MoundsieW, -innesora In order to remain competitive and continue to attract customers to Moundsview Square, we are looking for help from the City in the way NORTHWAY SHOPPING CENTER State Hwy.23&Woodland of signage variances. Circle Pines,Minnesota Currently the City has limitations that would require our anchor tenants, SIBLEY PLAZA Budget Liquors, Coast to Coast and Minnesota Fabrics, to limit their West 7th Street signs'total area and sign height. The tenants have asked the owner of St.Paul,Minnesota the proper y—to-approach_th_e_City for approval on a sign letter height of 42 inches. SOUTHVIEW SHOPPING CENTER Southview Blvd.&12th Street The reason we are asking for the City's assistance is that these tenants South St.Paul.Minnesota need higher visibility and better signage to keep the customers' dollars, jobs and business in the City of Mounds View. SEP 28 ' 92 8: 23 FROM PASTER ENTERPRISES PAGE . 003 Clearly, the sign work would be done by professional companies that are fabricating the tenants' signs in the most aesthetically pleasing design possible. We respectfully request your approval as soon as possible so that the new signage can be fabricated and completed in conjunction with the now completed remodeling of the exterior on the shopping center. Your cooperation on this approval is very much appreciated and together we can work on keeping the customers' retail dollars and jobs in the City of Mounds View for.the benefit the entire community. Thank you. Best personal regards, MOUNDS)" SQUARE ASSOCIATES dward J. Paster Partner EJP:mm cc: Mr. John H . Streeter Mr. Jim R. Everson ; W — v Ili O R v' U N Q gckoviN J0 °4 . v N iv) .. Q � Zao 01111 • P . /,, R ,. (1",(.4 1 . „ I / 0 —____.* I . LI, t• , . • p • N1 4 Frei OA 1 li X if '17 .� 1L. _2P,671. _rteIrnal H — O ` ',FI . s Nto _•_ ! to �—-. . . ( 1 QIMIi —r„:1 us3 �: r ilzIN MI E r .b T _ 4yl4J!= F _� 4. '! ••• i�1 '• • I E `° i 0 'F = x• 1.1" i JI "� y : Ma{Nq�q 1 !C —_ N = ft. C mu • se — M S . .r _ X)• 1 ,tin N N N. 0 k a- s r .KU r 12 1 �_� i _ • i _ •. �wv= MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 345-92 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION DENYING SIGN AREA VARIANCE REQUEST BY PASTER ENTERPRISES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2577 HIGHWAY 10, PLANNING CASE NO. 350-92 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Paster Enterprises for a variance to allow the placement of 372 square feet of sign area at 2577 Highway 10 where only 100 square feet is allowed by Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the criteria used to evaluate all variance requests; and WHEREAS, the applicant has presented a hardship statement to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of the provisions of this code would not deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Code; and WHEREAS, special conditions of the property do result from the actions of the applicant; and WHEREAS, granting the variance would confer special privileges on the applicant that are not enjoyed by other property owners in the same district; and WHEREAS, the variance requested is not the minimum necessary to alleviate the hardship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission denies the variance request of Paster Enterprises for the placement of 372 square feet of sign area at 2577 Highway 10. Adopted this 1st day of October, 1992 . ATTEST: Chairman (SEAL) Planner Agenda Section: 9•B ©mos REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ni Report Number: 92-404C Report Date: 10-8-92 I( w STAFF REPORT Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE October 13, 1992 0 Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda E2I Council Business Item Description: Consideration of Resolution No. 4292 Approving/Denying the Sign Area Variance Request by Paster Enterprises for the Property Located at 2541 Highway 10, Planning Case 351-92 Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; Paster Enterprises, representing Minnesota Fabrics, has made application for a variance to allow for signage in excess of City allowed size requirements at 2541 Highway 10 (Mounds View Square) . Chapter 39 of the Mounds View Municipal Code allows for up to 100 square feet of sign area per business occupant in the form of a wall sign. The applicant has proposed one(1) sign - approximately 161 square feet in area - to be located on the building facia. The plans indicate that the sign will be illuminated. • Staff has reviewed the proposal against other sections of the Municipal Code and footh rhthan tho est e governing the aforementionedto be in compliance with all variancle applicable requirements The Mounds View Planning Commission, at a special October 1, 1992 meeting, reviewed and denied the request as proposed. At this time, the applicant is exercising his right of appeal of that decision to the City Council as allowed by the Municipal Code. I have included a copy of all materials received as a part of the application. In addirtion,I have incl ded a copy of City Council ion No. 4292 for your review and consideration. Please note that the resolution is an "either\or" resolution and eiLher approve or deny the request based upon review of. the applicant'sproposal. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Paul Harrington, C. y Planner RECOMMENDATION; Adopt City Council Resolution No. 4292 with appropriate language. RESOLUTION NO. 4292 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING\DENYING THE SIGN AREA VARIANCE REQUEST BY PASTER ENTERPRISES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2541 HIGHWAY 10, PLANNING CASE NO. 351-92 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission reviewed the request of Paster Enterprises for a variance to allow the placement of a 161 square foot sign at 2541 Highway 10 where only 100 square feet is allowed by Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission applied the criteria used to evaluate all variance requests; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission denied the request in Resolution No. 346-92; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Municipal Code allows for the appeal of denied variance requests at the City Council level; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the request as proposed against the criteria used to evaluate all variance requests. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves\denies the variance request of Paster Enterprises for the placement of a 161 square foot sign at 2541 Highway 10 based on the following finding(s) of fact: 1. 2 . 3. Adopted this-1-3t h-day_af Oc toter_,-1992 . ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION APPLICANT: PAST EAD—ERPA SE S Phone 6'_ 790 1 ADDRESS: aaa7 UnJ/(J, ,41/ , S% / OZ-y MA). Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code Interest in Prop (check appropriate box): Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee, Operator, Manager ❑ Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other (explain) Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before final City action of this request. PROPERTY INVOLVED: Address/General Location a541 i OOi00.5 d1&--14) spviV E I�/A) )Eso7 FASIZICS Legal Description or Property Identification Number t” - 3o 01-3 --//^000( Legal Owner: Name/Address Present Use (check appropriate box): ❑ UndevelopedNacant ❑ Single Family Dwelling ❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling 0. Multi-Family (No. of Units ) Business/Commercial Establishment Industrial Establishment ❑ Other (explain) Property Classification: ❑ Abstract 0 Torrens REQUEST: We- REQVES7 VA/Vico-0(E 7D ME. o,t)lAUAA)cE. 7D Auacv i b/ r R sly *Please note: Applicant may be responsible for additional fees associated with the review ofthis request. I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUE. Signature Rezoning $200/acre,minimum$200,maximum $1,000 ark Fund Dedication Fee Variance R-1 to R-2-$75,all others$200 Date Paid — -' Conditional Use Permit R-1 to R-2-$75,all others$200 Receipt Number Code Appeal $75 Develop./Site Plan Review $100/acre,minimum 100,maximum$500 Total Fees Paid eR4/1•DO Minor Subdivision $150 Date Paid Major Subdivision $250 plus$250 deposit Receipt Number x397 Comp. Plan Amendment $200 Wetland Alteration Permit $50 plus deposit determined by Staff Additional Fee Paid Wetland Buffer Permit $10 Date Paid Planning Sign $50 Receipt Number PUD $350 PUD Amendment $150 Date of final action APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED 0 Date q-A s"--7.1- Planning Case No. ;S/— 9.2*-' Admin.Account No. V1.J - r 1 .c0 o .py . , , p . , ci ,,,. z , , , , li y f,,, ,R . . , R c 0 : ,ip .. . gal 11 o Ql b v 0d ) r' r rou) °_ � ff . -41. Cr= 1 • v T - - r • NI L Q - 61 1 ::3 m I b 4 _N C=4.------Y) • -Z1 (fi ' •1;:=5i N � gyp ° oC .'3 . I M L- "J SEP 28 ' 92 8: 22 FROM PASTER ENTERPRISES PAGE . 002 DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF SHOPPING CENTERS 2227 University Ave.•St.Paul,MN 55114.612-646-7901 • Fax 612-646-1389 • September 25, 1992 CENTRAL PLAZA 45th&Central Ave.N.E Minneapois,Minnesota Ms. Samantha Orduno City Administrator CRYSTAL SHOPPING CENTER City of Mounds View Bass Lake Road&West Broadway Administrative Offices Crystal,Minnesota 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 DODDWAY SHOPPING CENTER Dodd Road&Bernard Street Re: Moundsview Square Shopping Center West St.Paul,Minnesota Signage Variance Request FARMINGTON MALL Dear Ms. Orduno: S.Hwy.50&S.Hwy.3 Farmington.Minnesota This letter is a request, on behalf of the tenants located in the Moundsview Square Shopping Center, for a variance in the sign criteria LEXINGTON PLAZA SHOPPES for the City of Mounds View. Lexington&Larpenteur Roseville,Minnesota We have just completed a major, exterior remodeling of Moundsview Square which upgrades the appearance significantly of the shopping MENDOTA PLAZA center property. Our anchor tenants at the center are asking the City State Hwy.110&Dodd Road Mendota Heights,Minnesota of Mounds View for assistance in getting the best signage visibility possible in the marketplace. There is significant competitive pressure coming from shopping center properties located north on Highway 10 MOUNDSVIEW SQUARE• Hwy.10&Long Lake Road in Blaine and the Northtown area. Mounds-View,-Minnesota In order to remain competitive and continue to attract customers to NORTHWAY SHOPPING CENTER Moundsview Square, we are looking for help from the City in the way State Hwy.23&Woodland of signage variances. Circle Pines.Minnesota Currently the City has limitations that would require our anchor tenants, SIBLEY PLAZA Budget Liquors, Coast to Coast and Minnesota Fabrics, to limit their West 7th Street signs'total area and sign height. The tenants have asked the owner of St.Paul,Minnesota the-proper to_approach the City for approval on a sign letter height of 42 inches. SOUTHVIEW SHOPPING CENTER Southview Blvd.&12th Street The reason we are asking for the City's assistance is that these tenants South St.Paul.Minnesota need higher visibility and better signage to keep the customers' dollars, jobs and business in the City of Mounds View. SEP 28 ' 92 8: 23 FROM PASTER ENTERPRISES PAGE . 003 • Clearly, the sign work would be done by professional companies that are fabricating the tenants' signs in the most aesthetically pleasing design possible. We respectfully request your approval as soon as possible so that the new signage can be fabricated and completed in conjunction with the now completed remodeling of the exterior on the shopping center. Your cooperation on this approval is very much appreciated and together we can work on keeping the customers' retail dollars and jobs in the City of Mounds View for the benefit the entire community. Thank you. Best personal regards, MOUNDS)" SQUARE ASSOCIATES % dward J. Paster Partner EJP:mm cc: Mr. John H. Streeter Mr. Jim R. Everson MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 346-92 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION DENYING SIGN AREA VARIANCE REQUEST BY PASTER ENTERPRISES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2541 HIGHWAY 10, PLANNING CASE NO. 351-92 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Paster Enterprises for a variance to allow the placement of 161 square feet of sign area at 2541 Highway 10 where only 100 square feet is allowed by Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the criteria used to evaluate all variance requests; and WHEREAS, the applicant has presented a hardship statement to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of the provisions of this code would not deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Code; and WHEREAS, special conditions of the property do result from the actions of the applicant; and WHEREAS, granting the variance would confer special privileges on the applicant that are not enjoyed by other property owners in the same district; and WHEREAS, the variance requested is not the minimum necessary to alleviate the hardship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission denies the variance request of Paster Enterprises for the placement of 161 square feet of sign area at 2541 Highway 10 . Adopted this 1st day of October, 1992 . ATTEST: Chairman (SEAL) Planner Agenda Section: 9•C 1,2,3 am REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-405C Report Date: 10-8-9 2 ,STAFF REPORT Council Action: G Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE October 13, 1992 0 Public Hearings O Consent Agenda EJ Council Business Item Description: Consideration of Franchise Agreement and Implementation of Franchise Fee Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; For Council consideration and approval at the Tuesday, October 13th meeting will be the following Ordinances initially introduced on August 24, 1992 and tabled on September 14th and September 28th to provide additional time for discussions with representatives both from the residential and business community: ORDINANCE NO. 517 GRANTING TO NSP AN ELECTRIC UTILITY FRANCHISE AND NO. 518 GRANTING NSP A GAS UTILITY FRANCHISE The two franchise agreements are basically very similar to the existing franchise agreements; it grants to NSP the right to construct, operate, repair and maintain electric and gas distribution systems within the City. The Agreements, however, do provide for clear, concise performance stipulations both for the City and NSP in regards to the use of public ground, relocation of facilities and required permit procedures. Both Agreements also provide for a franchise fee of no more than 4% on the grossoperating revenues of NSP and a monthly payment schedule of the fees to the City as opposed to annual payments after one year as the provision of the current Franchise. • - - - ,. _ . _ - . - •nsistent with provisions generally accepted in other Metro cities and both agreements have =- -n reviewed and approved both by NSP and our City Attorney. / Samantha rduno, City A• iinistrator RECOMMENDATION a. Motion to approve Ordinance Nos. 517 and 518 granting to NSP an Electric and Gas Energy Franchise contingent upon approval of Ordinance No. 519 Implementing a Franchise Fee. b. Motion to approve Ordinance No. 519 Implementing a Franchise Fee on Electric and Natural Gas Utility Companies for the Operation of the Utility within the City of Mounds View as Per Agreed Upon Rate Schedule STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 13 , 1992 PAGE TWO ORDINANCE NO. 519 IMPLEMENTING A ELECTRIC AND GAS FRANCHISE FEE At the Public Hearing (held on August 24th) At the Public Hearing held on August 24th, the rationale for implementation of a franchise fee was discussed in detail. The discussion centered on the following: * Franchise fees are another form of taxation - acknowledgement of this has always been clearly stated in all written and verbal communications from the City. * Franchise fees, as opposed to general property tax, impose payment on all users of City services. * Franchise fees/user taxes raise revenue with less financial impact on the average valued home owner. * There is more measure of control over a user tax than a a property tax. Less energy consumption means less tax. If someone is on an extended absence from their home, their property tax is not decreased. * The franchise fee is not an allowable itemized deduction on Federal and State Income Tax returns. If the franchise fee was 4% the average residential utility customer's annual franchise fee payment would be approximately $40. Approximately 50% of those persons filing Federal and State Income Tax returns itemize deductions. A family of four with an annual income o 4I , iis wou d realize a tax-savings of $-10 if the franchise fewerp an allowable_itemized deduction. * Franchise fees would raise needed revenue to continue essential and resident requested services. At the maximum rate of 4%, a total of $277, 000 would be raised. In order to continue to meet these service needs, the City needs to raise approximately $155, 000 for budget year 1993 . * Wits - • - • - e of the Legislature of cutting promised (and much needed Local Government Aid - 1/3 of the City's budget) mid-year and after the City's budget has been finalized and the revenues established for the year, the City anticipates additional cuts to LGA in 1993 in the range of $100, 000-$150, 000. Implementation of a franchise fee would STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 13, 1992 PAGE THREE raise the needed revenue to offset the drastic, anticipated LGA cuts without service reductions or future higher property taxes. * Action by the Legislature to change the property tax rate structure (while good for most of the City's residents and businesses) has resulted in reduced revenues for the City at a time when the City's operational expenses are increasing. * Implementation by the State sales tax onto all City purchases has resulted in a $60, 000-80, 000 expenditure to the City. * The state of the economy has resulted in lower investment earnings, fewer construction permits, less economic development revenues for the City - monies used to offset expenses and keep property taxes down. Meetings with representatives from the business and residential community have resulted in discussions on the following points: * Most notably and most appreciated, a recognition both by representatives of residents and businesses that the City has in the past and continues to be frugal and economically sensitive to the taxpayers and that many events outside the control of the City have resulted in the City's need to be creative in finding revenue sources. * The need for a sunset clause for the franchise fee (3 , 5 or 10 years) . * A sliding scale of fees for commercial/industrial consumers. * Without a sliding scale of fees, the preference for increased property taxes vs thranchise fee. The Franchise Agreements provide that the City may impose a maximum of 4% on NSP's gross operating revenues for the rights to transmit and furnish electric and gas energy to the residents and business of Mounds View. How the fee is structured is left to the discretion of the City as long as the fee structure never exceeds a total of 4% of revenues. Alternatives to the straight 4% across the board (on both electric and gas, residential and business) are prPsent_Pd below. The Ordinance implementing the fee has been left blank in the section which establishes the rate and its structure. Upon conclusion of Council's discussion, the Section II of Proposed Ordinance No. 519 can be filled in with the option which the Council has agreed upon. STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 13, 1992 PAGE FOUR OPTION NO. 1 Fee Structure *Revenue Generated 4% on electric; 4% on gas; all users $ 277, 000 Exemption on winter space heating - $ 221, 000 November 1 - April 30 OPTION NO. 2 Fee Structure *Revenue Generated 3% on electric and gas - all users $ 207,960 Exemption on winter space heating- $ 166, 010 November 1 - April 30 OPTION NO. 3 Fee Structure *Revenue Generated 3% on electric and gas - residential $ 126, 060 3% on gas - commercial/industrial 23 ,454 Sliding scale for commercial/industrial electric: 3% on small users (NSP classification DC100 & DS100 $ 1, 340 2 .75% on intermediate users (NSP classification DK004, DP004, DT004, DT005, $ 12 , 473 2 . 3% on secondary users (classification GK004) $ 14, 268 1.7% on large users (classification GP004) $ 5, 111 TOTAL: $ 182,716 These totals are "approximate" based on 1992 actuals. OPTION NO. 4 Any of the above options, can exempt all local government, school bungs—and acili .ies„i f the Council so chooses. Such action would reduce the fee collected by $35-$45, 000. STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 13, 1992 PAGE FIVE OPTION NO. 5 Any of the above options may also include a sunset clause which essentially would state, in a new Section No. , " The franchise fees established herein shall automatically terminate on December 31, unless reenacted by the City Council after a public hearing preceded by public notice published in the legal newspaper no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. ELECTRIC ENERGY FRANCHISE ORDINANCE NO. 517 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE GRANTING NORTHERN STATES POWER, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, REPAIR AND MAINTAIN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA AN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND TRANSMISSION LINES, INCLUDING NECESSARY POLES, LINES, FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, FOR THE FURNISHING OF ELECTRIC ENERGY TO THE CITY, IT'S INHABITANTS, AND OTHERS AND TO USE PUBLIC WAYS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS OF THE CITY FOR SUCH PURPOSES. The City Council of the City of Mounds View ordains: SECTION 1 . DEFINITIONS The following terms shall mean: 1 .1 City. The City of Mounds View, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota. 1 .2 Company Northern-States Power;a-M'rnn-esota 1 .3 City Utility System. The facilities used for providing sewer, water, or any other public utility service owned or operated by City or agency thereof. 1 .4 Electric Facilities. -Electric-transmission-and-distribution towers, poles, lines, guys, anchors, ducts, fixtures, and necessary 1 appurtenances owned or operated by the Company for the purpose of providing electric energy for public use. 1 .5 Notices. Any notice required by this franchise shall be sufficient if, in the case of notice to the Company, it is delivered to Northern States Power, attention Vice President Gas Utility, 825 Rice Street, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55117. Notice to the City shall be delivered to the City Administrator. 1 .6 Public Ground. All streets, alleys, public ways, utility - - - - . • ii , - • ev - : - : - - . .. - - - - grant the use to the Company. Section 2. FRANCHISE 2.1 Grant of Franchise. The City hereby grants Company, for a period of twenty (20) years from the Effective Date, the right to transmit and furnish electric energy for light, heat, power and other purposes for public and private use within and through the limits of the City as its boundaries now exist or as they may be extended in the future. For these purposes, the Company may construct, operate, repair and maintain Electric Facilities in, on, over, under and across the Public Grounds of the City subject to the provisions of this ordinance. The Company may do all reasonable things necessary or customary to accomplish these purposes, subject, however, to zoning ordinances, other applicable ordinances, permit procedures, and to the further provisions of this franchise. 2.2 Effective Date: Written Acceptance. This franchise shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law (and the City Charter), and its acceptance by the Company in writing filed with the Municipal Clerk within 60 days after publication. 2.3 Nonexclusive Franchise. This is not an exclusive franchise. 2.4 Publication Expense. The expense of publication of this 2 ordinance shall be paid by the Company. 2.5 Default. If either party asserts that the other party is in default in the performance of any obligation hereunder, the complaining party shall notify the other party of the default and the desired remedy. The notification shall be written. If the dispute is not resolved within 30 days of the written notice, either party may commence an action in District Court to interpret and enforce this franchise or for such other relief as may be permitted by law or equity for breach of the contract, or either party may take any other action permitted by law. If the Company is in default as to any part of this franchise, the City may, after reasonable notice to the Company and the failure of the Company to cure the default within 60 days, take such action as may be reasonably necessary to abate the condition caused by the default, and the Company agrees to reimburse the municipality for all its reasonable costs and for its costs of collection, including attorney fees. Nothing in this section shall bar the Company from challenging the City's claim that a default has occurred. In the event of disagreement over the existence of a default, the burden of proving the default shall be on the City. SECTION 3. CONDITIONS OF USE. 3.1 Use of Public Ground. Electric Facilities shall be located, constructed, installed and maintained so as not to endanger or unnecessarily interfere with the usual and customary traffic, travel, and use of Public Ground, and shall be subject to permit conditions of the City. The permit conditions may provide for the right of inspection by the City, and the Company agrees to make its Electric Facilities available for inspection at all reasonable times and places. 3.2 Field Locations. The Company shall provide field locations for any of its underground Electric Facilities within a reasonable period of time on request by the City. The period of time will be considered reasonabte if it compares favorably with the average time required by the cities in the same county to locate municipal 3 underground facilities for the Company. 3.3 Permit Required. The Company shall not open or disturb the surface of any Public Ground for any purpose without first having obtained a permit from the City, for which the City may impose a reasonable fee to be paid by the Company. The permit conditions imposed on the Company shall not be more burdensome than those imposed on other utilities for similar facilities or work. The mains, services and other property placed pursuant to such permit shall be located as shall be designated by the City. The Company may, however, open and disturb the surface of any Public Ground without a permit where an emergency exists requiring the immediate repair of its facilities. The Company in such event shall request a permit not later than the second working day thereafter. 3.4 Restoration. Upon completion of any work requiring the opening of any Public Ground, the Company shall restore the same, including paving and its foundations, to as good condition as formerly, and shall exercise reasonable care to maintain the same for two years thereafter in good condition. Said work shall be completed as promptly as weather permits, and if the Company shall not promptly perform and complete the work, remove all dirt, rubbish, equipment and material, and put the Public Ground in good condition, the City shall have the right to put it in good condition at the expense of the Company; and the Company shall, upon demand, pay to the municipality the cost of such work performed by the City, including its direct and indirect costs plus ten percent additional as liquidated damages. This remedy shall be in addition_to_any other r_emedy_availabie to the City. 3.5 Shared Use of Poles. The Company shall make space available on its poles or towers for City fire, water utility, police or other City facilities whenever such use will not interfere with the use of such poles or towers by the Company, by another electric utility, by a telephone utility, or by any cable television company or other form of communication company. In addition, the City shall pay for any added cost incurred by the Company because of such use by City. 4 3.6 Relocation of Electric Facilities. Except as provided in Section 3.7, if the City determines to vacate for a City improvement project, or to grade, regrade, or change the line involving any Public Ground, or construct or reconstruct any city Utility System involving any Public Ground, it may order the Company to relocate its Electric Facilities at its own expense. The City shall give the Company reasonable notice of plans to vacate for a City improvement project, or to grade, regrade, or change the line involving any Public Ground or to construct or reconstruct any City Utility System. if a relocation is ordered within five years of a prior relocation of the same Electrical Facilities, which was made at Company expense, the City shall reimburse the Company for non-betterment expenses on a time and material basis, provided that if a subsequent relocation is required because of the extension of a City Utility System to a previously unserved area, the Company may be required to make the subsequent relocation at it expense. Nothing in this Ordinance requires the Company to relocate, remove, replace or reconnect at its own expense its facilities where such relocation, removal, replacement or reconstruction is solely for the convenience of the City and is not reasonably necessary for the construction or reconstruction of Public Ground or City Utility System or other City improvement. Nothing herein relieves any person from liability arising out of the failure to exercise reasonable care to avoid damaging Electric Facilities while performing any activity. The City may further require the Company to relocate or remove its Electric Facilities from Public Ground upon a finding by City that the Electric Facilities have become or will become a substantial impairment of the public use to which the Public Ground is or will be put. The relocation or removal shall be at the Company's expense. 3.7 Projects with State or Federal Funding. Relocation, removal, or rearrangement of any Company facilities made necessary because of the extension into or through City of a federally-aided highway project shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 161 .46 as supplemented or amended. It is understood that the right herein granted to Company is a valuable right. City shall 5 not order Company to remove, or relocate its facilities when a Public Way is vacated, improved or realigned because of a renewal or a redevelopment plan which is financially subsidized in whole or in part by the Federal Government or any agency thereof, unless the reasonable non-betterment costs of such relocation and the loss and expense resulting therefrom are first paid to Company, but the City need not pay those portions of such for which reimbursement to it is not available. 3.8 Vacation of Public Ground. The City shall give the Company at least two weeks' prior written notice of a proposed vacation ora Public Ground. Except where required for a City street or other improvement project, the vacation of Public Ground, after the installation of Electric Facilities, shall not operate to deprive the Company of its rights to operate and maintain such Electrical Facilities, until the reasonable cost of relocating the same and the loss and expense resulting from such relocation are first paid to the Company. In no case, however, shall the City be liable to the Company for failure to specifically preserve a right-of-way, under Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.29. SECTION 4. FRANCHISE FEES. 4.1 Separate Ordinance. During the term of this franchise, the City may impose on the Company a franchise fee of not more than percent of the Company's gross revenues as hereinafter defined. The franchise fee shall be imposed by a separate ordinance duly adopted by the City Council, which ordinance shall not be adopted nor fee be effective until 60 days after written notice enclosing such proposed ordinance has been served upon the Company by certified mail. Section 2.5 shall constitute the sole remedy for solving disputes between the Company and the City in regard to the interpretation of, or enforcement of, the separate ordinance. No action by the City to implement a separate ordinance will commence until this ordinance is effective. No preexisting ordinance imposing a fee shall be effective against the Company unless it is specifically awarded after the effective date of this ordinance following the procedures of this section 4 for the adoption of a new separate ordinance. 6 4.2 Terms Defined. The term "gross revenues" means all sums received by the Company from the sale of gas to its retail customers within the corporate limits of the City. Gross revenues excludes any surcharge or similar addition to the Company's charges to customers for the purpose of reimbursing the Company for the cost resulting from the franchise fee. 4.3 Collection of the Fee. The franchise fee shall be payable monthly, and shall be based on the gross revenues of the Company during the preceding month. The payment is due on the last business day of the month following the month for which payment is to be made. the percent fee may be changed by ordinance from time to time; however, each change shall meet the same notice requirements and the percentage may not be changed more often that annually. Such fee shall not exceed any amount which the Company may legally charge its customers prior to payment to the City by imposing a surcharge equivalent to such fee in its rates for gas service. The time and manner of collecting the franchise fee is subject to the approval of the Public Utilities Commission, which the Company agrees to use best efforts to obtain. The Company agrees to make its gross revenues records available for inspection by the City at reasonable times. SECTION 5. TREE TRIMMING The Company may trim all trees and shrubs of the City's Public Grounds interfering with the proper construction, operation, repair and maintenance of any Electric Facilities installed hereunder, provided that the Company shall hold the City harmless from any liability arising therefrom, and-su.bj-ect-to permiLo other_reasonable regulation by the City. SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION 6.1 Hold Harmless. The Company shall indemnify, keep and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims and actions on account of injury or death of persons or damage to property occasioned by the 7 construction, maintenance, repair, inspection, the issuance of permits, or the operation of the Electric Facilities located in the City. The City shall not be indemnified for losses or claims occasioned through its own negligence except for losses or claims arising out of or alleging the City's negligence as to the issuance of permits for, or inspection of, the Company's plans or work. The City shall not be indemnified if the injury or damage results from the performance in a proper manner of acts reasonably deemed hazardous by Company, and such performance is nevertheless ordered or directed by City after notice of Company's determination. 6.2 Litigation. In the event a suit is brought against the City under circumstances where this agreement to indemnify applies, such suit if written notice thereof is promptly given to the Company within a period wherein the Company is not prejudiced in defense of the claim by lack of such notice. If the Company is required to indemnify and defend, it will thereafter have control of such litigation, but the Company shall not settle such litigation without the consent of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section is not, as to third parties, a waiver of any defense or immunity otherwise available to the City. The Company, in defending any action on behalf of the City shall be entitled to assert in any action every defense or immunity that the City could assert in its own behalf. SECTION 7. CHANGE IN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Any change in the form of government of the City shall not affect the validity of this Ordinance. Any governmental unit succeeding the City shall, withmut the consent of the Company, succeed to all of the rightsand oblations of the City provided in this Ordinance. SECTION 8. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this franchise is found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, the validity of the remainder shall not be affected. SECTION 9. PREVIOUS FRANCHISES SUPERSEDED 8 This franchise supersedes any previous gas franchise granted to the Company or its predecessor. SECTION 10. NO WAIVER. Failure to enforce any of these provisions shall not be deemed a waiver of any provision of this franchise. SECTION 11 . AMENDMENT. subsequent ordinance declaring the provisions of the amendment, which amendatory ordinance shall become effective upon the filing of the Company's written consent thereto with the City Clerk within 90 days after the effective date of the amendatory ordinance. Passed and approved Mayor ATTEST: Clerk-Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 9 GAS ENERGY FRANCHISE ORDINANCE NO. 518 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE GRANTING NORTHERN STATES POWER, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, REPAIR AND MAINTAIN FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE TRANSPORTATION, DISTRIB - • 1 , MANUFACTURE AND SALE OF GAS ENERGY FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USE AND TO USE THE PUBLIC GROUND OF THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA FOR SUCH PURPOSES; AND PRESCRIBING CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Mounds View ordains: SECTION 1 . DEFINITIONS The following terms shall mean: 1 .1 City. The City of Mounds View. 1 .2 Company. Northern States Power, a Minnesota corporation, i I - • - •-assigns. 1 .3 Gas. Natural gas, manufactured gas, mixture of natural gas and manufactured gas or other forms of gas energy. 1 .4 Gas Facilities. Gas transmission and distribution pipes, lines, ducts, fixtures, and all necessary equipment and appurtenances owned or operated by tine Company or-the-purpose of_pro ding-gas • energy for public use. 1 1 .5 Notices. Any notice required by this franchise shall be sufficient if, in the case of notice to the Company, it is delivered to Northern States Power, attention Vice President Gas Utility, 825 Rice Street, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55117. Notice to the City shall be delivered to the City Administrator. 1 .6 Public Ground. All streets, alleys, public ways, utility easements and public grounds of the City to which it has the right to grant the use to the Company. Section 2. FRANCHISE 2.1 Grant of Franchise. The City hereby grants Company, for a period of twenty (20) years from the Effective Date, the right to import, manufacture, transport, distribute and sell gas for public and private use in the City, and for these purposes to construct, operate, repair and maintain in, on, over, under and across the Public Ground of the City, all facilities and equipment used in connection therewith, and to do all things which are necessary or customary in the accomplishment of these objectives, subject to zoning ordinances, other applicable ordinances, permit procedures, and the provisions of this franchise. 2.2 Effective Date: Written Acceptance. This franchise shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law (and the City Charter), and its acceptance by the Company in writing filed with the Municipal Clerk within 60 days after publication. 2.3 Nonexclusive Franchise. This is not an exclusive franchise. 2.4 Publication Expense. The expense of publication of this ordinance shall be paid by the Company. 2.5 Default. If either party asserts that the other party is in default in the performance of any obligation hereunder, the complaining party shall noti yfthe other party of the default and-the desiredxedy. The notification shall be written. If the dispute is not resolved within 30 2 days of the written notice, either party may commence an action in District Court to interpret and enforce this franchise or for such other relief as may be permitted by law or equity for breach of the contract, or either party may take any other action permitted by law. If the Company is in default as to any part of this franchise, the City may, after reasonable notice to the Company and the failure of the Company to cure the default within 60 days, take such action as may be reasonably necessary to abate the condition caused by the default, and the Company agrees to reimburse the municipality for all its • - . . e .• - Nothing in this section shall bar the Company from challenging the City's claim that a default has occurred. In the event of disagreement over the existence of a default, the burden of proving the default shall be on the City. SECTION 3. CONDITIONS OF USE. 3.1 Use of Public Ground. Gas Facilities shall be located, constructed, installed and maintained so as not to endanger or unnecessarily interfere with the usual and customary traffic, travel, and use of Public Ground, and shall be subject to permit conditions of the City. The permit conditions may provide for the right of inspection by the City, and the Company agrees to make its Gas Facilities available for inspection at all reasonable times and places. 3.2 Field Locations. The Company shall provide field locations_far_any_o#_its underground Gas Facilities within a reasonable period ottime on request by the City. The period of time will be considered reasonable if it compares favorably with the average time required by the cities in the same county to locate municipal underground facilities for the Company. 3.3 Permit Required. The Company shall not open or disturb the surface of any Public Ground for any purpose without first having obtained a permit from the City, for which the City may impose a reasonable fee to be paid by the Company. The permit conditions 3 imposed on the Company shall not be more burdensome than those imposed on other utilities for similar facilities or work. The mains, services and other property placed pursuant to such permit shall be located as shall be designated by the City. The Company may, however, open and disturb the surface of any Public Ground without a permit where an emergency exists requiring the immediate repair of its facilities. The Company in such event shall request a permit not later than the second working day thereafter. 3.4 Restoration. Upon completion of any work requiring the opening of any Public Ground, the Company shall restore the same, including paving and its foundations, to as good condition as formerly, and shall exercise reasonable care to maintain the same for two years thereafter in good condition. Said work shall be completed as promptly as weather permits, and if the Company shall not promptly perform and complete the work, remove all dirt, rubbish, equipment and material, and put the Public Ground in good condition, the City shall have the right to put it in good condition at the expense of the Company; and the Company shall, upon demand, pay to the municipality the cost of such work performed by the City, including its direct and indirect costs plus ten percent additional as liquidated damages. This remedy shall be in addition to any other remedy available to the City. 3.5 Relocation of Gas Facilities. The Company shall promptly, with due regard for seasonal working conditions, permanently relocate its Gas Facilities whenever the City orders such relocation. If the relocation is a result of the proper exercise of the police power in grading, regarding, changing the location or shape of or otherwise improving any Public Ground or constructing or reconstructing any sewer or water system therein, the relocation shall be at the expense of the Company. If the relocation is not a result of the proper exercise of the police power, the relocation shall be at the expense of the City. If such relocation is done without an agreement first being made as to who shall pay the relocation cost, such relocation of the facilities by the Company shall not be construed as a waiver of its right to be reimbursed-for the relo ion cost. If the Company claims that it should be reimbursed for such relocation costs, it shall notify the City within 4 thirty days after receipt of such order. The City shall give the Company reasonable notice of plans requiring such relocation. Nothing contained in this subsection shall require the Company to remove and replace its mains or to cut and reconnect its service pipe running from the main to a customer's premises at its own expense where the removal and replacement or cutting and reconnecting is made for the purpose of a more expeditious operation for the construction or reconstruction of underground facilities; nor shall anything contained herein relieve any person from liability arising out of the failure to exercise reasonable care to avoid damaging the Company's facilities while performing any work in any Public Ground. 3.6 Relocation When Public Ground Vacated. The vacation of any Public Ground shall not operate to deprive the Company of the right to operate and maintain its facilities therein. Unless ordered under Section 3.4, the Company need not relocate until the reasonable cost of relocating and the loss and expense resulting from such relocation are first paid to the Company. When the vacation is for the benefit of the City in the furtherance of a public purpose, the Company shall relocate at its own expense. 3.7 Projects with State or Federal Funding. Relocation, removal, or rearrangement of any Company facilities made necessary because of the extension into or through City of a federally-aided highway project shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 161 .46 as supplemented or amended. It is understood that the right herein granted to Company is a valuable right. City shall not order Company to remove, or relocate its facilities when a Public Way is vacated, improved or realigned because of a renewal or a redevelopment tan whiii financially subsidized in whole or in part-by the Federal Government or any agency thereof, unless the reasonable non-betterment costs of such relocation and the loss and expense resulting therefrom are first paid to Company, but the City need not pay those portions of such for which reimbursement to it is not available. reet Improvements, Paving or es-atacin-q T1Te-City shall give the Company reasonable written notice of plans for street 5 . improvements where paving or resurfacing of a permanent nature is involved. The notice shall contain the nature and character of the improvements, the streets upon which the improvements are to be made, the extent of the improvements and the time when the City will start the work, and, if more than one street is involved, the order in which this work is to proceed. The notice shall be given to the Company a sufficient length of time, considering seasonable working conditions, in advance of the actual commencement of the work to permit the Company to make any additions, alterations or repairs to its facilities the Company deems necessary. In cases where streets are at final width and grade, and the City has installed underground sewer and water mains and service connections to the property line abutting the streets prior to a permanent paving or resurfacing of such streets, and the Company's main is located under such street, the Company may be required to install gas service connections prior to such paving or resurfacing, whenever it is apparent that gas service will be required during the five years following the paving or resurfacing. SECTION 4. FRANCHISE FEES. 4.1 Separate Ordinance. During the term of this franchise, the City may impose on the Company a franchise fee of not more than percent of the Company's gross revenues as hereinafter defined. The franchise fee shall be imposed by a separate ordinance duly adopted by the City Council, which ordinance shall not be adopted nor fee be effective until 60 days after written notice enclosing such proposed ordinance has been served upon the Company by certified mail. Section 2.5 shall constitute the sole remedy for solving disputes between the Company and the City in regard to the interpretation of Or enforcement of, the separate ordinance. No action by the City to implement a separate ordinance will commence until this ordinance is effective. No preexisting ordinance imposing a fee shall be effective against the Company unless it is specifically awarded after the effective date of this ordinance following the procedures of this section 4 for the adoption of a new separate ordinance. 6 4.2 Terms Defined. The term "gross revenues" means all sums received by the Company from the sale of gas to its retail customers within the corporate limits of the City. Gross revenues excludes any surcharge or similar addition to the Company's charges to customers for the purpose of reimbursing the Company for the cost resulting from the franchise fee. 4.3 Collection of the Fee. The franchise fee shall be payable monthly, and shall be based on the gross revenues of the Company during the preceding month. The payment is due on the last business day of the month following the month for which payment is to be made. the percent fee may be changed by ordinance from time to time; however, each change shall meet the same notice requirements and the percentage may not be changed more often that annually. Such fee shall not exceed any amount which the Company may legally charge its customers prior to payment to the City by imposing a surcharge equivalent to such fee in its rates for gas service. The time and manner of collecting the franchise fee is subject to the approval of the Public Utilities Commission, which the Company agrees to use best efforts to obtain. The Company agrees to make its gross revenues records available for inspection by the City at reasonable times. SECTION 5. INDEMNIFICATION 5.1 Hold Harmless. The Company shall indemnify, keep and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims and actions on account of injury or death of persons or damage to property occasioned by the construction, maintenance, repair, removal, or operation of the Company's property located in, on, over, under or across the Public Ground of the City, unless such injury or damage is the result of the negligence of the City, its elected officials, employees, officers, or agents. The City shall not be entitled to reimbursement for its costs incurred prior to notification to the the Company of claims or actions and a reasonable opportunity for the Company to accept and undertake the defense. 7 5.2 Litigation. If a claim or action shall be brought against the City under circumstances where indemnification applies, the Company, at its sole cost and expense, shall defend the City if written notice of the claim or action is promptly given to the company within a period wherein the Company is not prejudiced in the defense of such claim or action by lack of such notice. The Company shall have complete control of such claim or action, but it may not settle without the consent of the City, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section is not, as to third parties, a waiver of any defense or immunity otherwise available to the City, and the Company in defending any action on behalf of the City shall be entitled to assert every defense or immunity that the City could assert in its own behalf. SECTION 6. CHANGE IN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Any change in the form of government of the City shall not affect the validity of this franchise. Any governmental unit succeeding the City shall, without the consent of the Company, automatically succeed to all of the rights and obligations of the City provided in this franchise. SECTION 7. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this franchise is found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, the validity of the remainder shall not be affected. SECTION 8. PREVIOUS FRANCHISES SUPERSEDED This franchise supersedes any previous franchise granted to the Company or its predecessor. SECTION 9. NO WAIVER. Failure to enforce any of these provisions shall not be deemed a waiver of any provision of this franchise. 8 SECTION 10. AMENDMENT. This ordinance may be amended at any time by the City passing a subsequent ordinance declaring the provisions of the amendment, which amendatory ordinance shall become effective upon the filing of the Company's written consent thereto with the City Clerk within 90 days after the effective date of the amendatory ordinance. Passed and approved Mayor ATTEST: Clerk-Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 9 ORDINANCE NO. 519 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING A FRANCHISE FEE ON ELECTRIC AND NATURAL GAS UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE UTILITY WITHIN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. PURPOSE Subdivision 1. The Mounds View City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide gas and electrical services within the City of Mounds View. Subdivision 2 . Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 517 and Ordinance No. 518, and the Franchise Agreement between the City of Mounds View (the City) and Northern States Power Company (the Company) , a franchise fee of not more than four (4%) of the Company's gross operating revenues may be imposed by the City at any time during the 20 year term of the Franchise. The franchise fee is paid as full compensation for the rights to transmit and furnish electric energy for light, heat, power and import, transport, sell and distribute gas for heating, illuminating and other purposes as outlined in Section 2 of Ordinances 517 and 518. SECTION II. STATEMENT A franchise fee is hereby imposed on Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, for its electrical and gas franchises granted by the City according to the fee structure out4.fined be-low: 1 ORDINANCE NO. 519 PAGE TWO OF TWO SECTION III. PAYMENT Said franchise fee shall be payable to the City in accordance with the terms set forth in Section 4 of the Franchise Agreements. SECTION IV. SURCHARGE Any such supplier may add to its effective rates for the utility services on which the public utility gross earnings tax is imposed, a surcharge to reimburse such supplier for the cost of the tax. SECTION V. PROOF OF COMPANY FINANCIAL STATUS Each said company shall make each payment when due and shall furnish therewith a complete and correct statement of revenues for the period. Such company shall permit the City and its representative free access to the company's records for the purpose of verifying such statements. SECTION VI. ENFORCEMENT The City shall have the right to levy against all property of such company or companies for payments of any amounts due. SECTION VII. EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this ordinance is 30 days after its publication and (60) days after written notice of this ordinance is served upon Northern States Power Company by registered mail. Introduced by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 24 day of August, 1992. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day-of , 1-992. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 2 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 40 FROM: SAMANTHA ORDUNO, CITY ADMINISTRAT• " DATE: OCTOBER 8, 1992 RE: INDEX FOR WEEK OF OCTOBER 13, 1992 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING (TUESDAY) MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 13. 1992 . Tuesday, October 13, 1992, City Council Work Session ITEMS PROVIDED IN THIS WEEK'S COUNCIL PACKET . This Is It! . Agenda . Unapproved Minutes, September 28 . Unapproved Minutes, October 6 . Approved Minutes, September 14 ****************** ADMINISTRATOR'S SCHEDULE (Please note that this schedule is subject to change as meetings are scheduled, rescheduled or canceled. At any time Audrey, M1c-hel-e ori-im-G.-will_h-a-v-e-m _ost curren_t_s_chedule and a number where I can be reached at all times.) Monday, October 12 Off Tuesday, October 13 8:00 a.m. Ramsey County Managers/Administrators Meeting - Little Canada MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE TWO OCTOBER 8, 1992 10:00 a.m. Staff Meeting 12:00 Noon Rotary - Guest of Cable Director 7:00 p.m. Council Meeting Wednesday, October 14 11 :30 a.m. Western Bank Tour Meeting - Mermaid 1 :00 p.m. Ramsey County Communications Group Thursday, October 15 11 :30 a.m. MAMA Meeting - St. Paul Friday, October 16