HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1992/06/01 AGENDA
BIECOUNCILINVORKISE8SIONiiii
PMS:
........................................................ ... ............ .
1 . Presentation by Everest Group Regarding Request for TIF
Funding of Mounds View Business Park East and West
2. Update on Storm Water Utility (Presentation by SEH)
3. Continued Discussion of City-Wide Parking Restrictions
4. Continued Discussion of Police Department Remodeling
5. Consideration of Ordinance No. 510 Amending the Mounds
View Municipal Code by Amending Chapter 6.05 Entitled,
"Personnel"
6. Consideration of City Hall Energy Efficient Lighting
7. Discussion Regarding Municipal Ballfields (per Councilmember
Quick)
8. -- Update On OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogens Standards
9. Consideration of Appointment to Environmental Quality
Task Force
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Agenda Section:OM�11.
D� 92-286WS
STAFF REPORT Report Number:
-1111V
AGENDA SESSION DATE JUNE 1, 1992 Report Date: 5/29/92
DISPOSITION
Item Description: PRESENTATION BY EVEREST GROUP REGARDING REQUEST FOR TIF FUNDING
OF MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK EAST AND WEST
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
S B �ili Franke and Tim Nelson of the Everest Group will be present at Monday
night's meeting to address the Council with a request for Tax Increment
financing for the completion of the Mounds View Business Park East and
West. Unlike previous projects, the proposal for the new additions to the
Business Park is one of a "pay as you go" development. The City would not
sell bonds to finance a land write down or public improvements. The
developer would upfront the costs and the funding for the land write-down
and any public improvements would be reimbursed to the developer from the
increment generated by the new tax dollars.
While this appears on the surface to be a "no risk" to the City (and in
comparison to past projects, it is not) , there are some issues the Council
may wish to assess:
1. In granting TIF for land write-down/public improvements, the
increment used to reimburse the developer would be lost to
the City to use for other TIF projects within the City.
2 . Because the tax increment generated from the new development
would be used to reimburse the developer, the distribution
of new tax money to the all taxing jurisdictions would be
delayed 10-15 years.
3 . Unless something is structured to provide for immediate and
on-going "Administrative or Operational" costs, the City
will have increases to its operating expenses as there will
be new development to provide services to without an increase
in tax revenue.
4 . The Business Park will develop on its own and without TIF
assistance in time. The economy is still sluggish and
it is impossible—to—predict—when it will turn—around—to
provide a marketplace capable of spurring development not
dependent on financing incentives. Tif assistance will
assure that the Business Park will develop far more rapidly
than without such assistance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Saman ha Orduno, City Administrator
Everest is looking for the Council's response on their proposal so they can proceed or reassess their direction.
or reassess their direction.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 2
92-289WS
STAFF REPORT Report Number:
June 1, 1992 Report Date: 5/28/92
AGENDA SESSION DATE
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Surface Water Management Utility - Update
Administrator's Review/Recommendation: r
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
Attached are updated cost calculations regarding the proposed
Surface Water Management Utility. The rate calculation sheet is
based on the updated 5 Year costs. Rates Would change depending
on the costs actually included in the 5 Year plan. For example,
if the Capital Projects were to be financed from assessments, the
5 Year Expenditure estimate would be reduced by $330,000. This
would result in a rate reduction of approximately 48%. Costs to
residents then would be split between utility charges and special
assessment charges.
Mark Lobermeir (from SEH) will be at the meeting to discuss the
basis of rates, comparison to general fund levy, and answer any
questions regarding the proposed implementation plan.,
Ric inetor
City Engineer/Director of Public Works
RECOMMENDATION:
City of Mounds View
Surface Water Management Program
May 27, 1992
Estimated Five-year Expenditures
Planning &Inventories $49,000
1. Local Surface Water Management Plan Amendments $19,000
2. Water Quality Planning-Needs Assessment $5,000
3. Water Quality Monitoring &Improvements $15,000
(Chemical Applications, Weed Harvesting, Etc.
4. FEMA Update $10,000
5. Grant Studies'Applications
Surface Water Management Utility $8,500
1. Utility Implementation (Charge Determination) $6,000
2. Billing &Collection System Modification $2,500
Capital Expenditures $381,400
1. C.I.P. Projects $250,000
2. Minor Repair&Construction $20,000
Subtotal $270,000
10% Construction Contingency $27,000
Subtotal $297,000
20% Engineering & Administration $59,400
Subtotal $356,400
3. Property Easements &Acquisition $20,000
4. Automation (Software,etc.) $5,000
Personnel&Equipment $240,000
1. City Administration,Permitting,Etc. $19,000
2. City Routine Maintenance Activities $107,000
(Street Sweeping,Catch Basin Cleaning,
Ditch&Pond Maintenance,etc.)
3 Semiannual Pond Inspection $25,000
4. Utility Staff Support &Customer Service $87,500
5. Ordinance Review $10,500
Note: Italics indicate items which are not included in the Capital Improvements Program
of the City Surface Water Management Plan.
**** SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY SPREADSHEET ****
CITY: MOUNDS VIEW
JOB NO.: 90334
DATE: 5-27-92
RAINFALL: 2 IN.
5 YR REV $687,900
REVISED 8/24/90 MLL
***************************************************************************************************
* RUNOFF TOTAL UTILITY QUARTERLY COSTS *
* PROPERTY RUNOFF AREA VOLUME RUNOFF = FACTOR *
* ZONING (INCHES) (ACRES) (AC.in) % CONTRIB. TOTAL PER PER PER *
P
* *
* *
* R1 & R2 0.30 1393.72 413.21 39.5% 1.00 $13,581 $9.74 $2.83 $4.78 *
* R3 0.80 38.29 30.45 2.9% 2.68 $1,001 $26.13 NA NA *
* R4 0.97 97.06 93.69 9.0% 3.26 $3,079 $31.72 NA NA *
* R5/R0 0.97 84.16 81.23 7.8% 3.26 $2,670 $31.72 NA NA *
* 81,2,3,4 1.24 121.276 150.02 14.3% 4.17 $4,931 $40.66 NA NA *
* I1 0.97 90.31 87.17 8.3% 3.26 $2,865 $31.72 NA NA *
* CRP 0.14 24.85 3.36 0.3% 0.46 $110 $4.44 NA NA *
* PF 0.38 118.11 44.99 4.3% 1.28 $1,479 $12.52 NA NA *
* PUD 1.09 107.47 117.57 11.2% 3.69 $3,864 $35.96 NA NA *
* SCHOOL/CHU 0.44 55.83 24.82 2.4% 1.50 $816 $14.61 NA NA *
* STREET/ROW 561.431 *
* WATER 237.84 *
* *
* TOTAL 2930 1046.52 100.0% $34,395 *
* *
* *
* (1) UTILITY FACTOR IS RUNOFF (INCHES) DIVIDED BY RUNOFF (INCHES) FOR SINGLE FAMILY *
* RESIDENTIAL (R1) *
* (2) TOTAL QUARTERLY COST FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL *
* QUARTERLY REVENUE EQUAL TO THE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL RUNOFF *
* (3) COST PER ACRE IS PER ACRE COST FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLIED BY *
* UTILITY FACTOR *
* (4) TOTAL QUARTERLY COSTS FOR PROPERTIES OTHER THAN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL EQUAL *
* COST PER ACRE TIMES TOTAL ACRES *
**************************************************************************************************
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 5
ntrOMOS Report Number: 9 2—2 8 7 WS
STAFF REPORT
Report Date: 5-28-92
AGENDA SESSION DATE JUNE 1, 1992 p
DISPOSITION
Item Description: ORDINANCE NO. 510 AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW
BY AMENDING CHAPTER 6. 05 ENTITLED, "PERSONNEL"
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
Section 6 . 05 of the Mounds View City Code states "all probationary,
temporary and regular appointments to municipal service shall be made by
the appointing authority. " The appointing authority for the City of Mounds
View is the Mounds View City Council. Due to the nature of temporary and
seasonal employment (high volume and short tenure) , there is a history of
hiring these employees without Council approval. To comply with City Code
yet remain consistent with past practices, it is recommended the City Code
be amended, per ordinance number 510, to read "all temporary and seasonal
employees appointed to municipal service shall be appointed by the City
Administrator. " All regular full-time and regular part-time appointments
would still be made by the City Council.
11-4011/4"lk
Tim Cruikshank, Management Assistant
RECOMMENDATION;
To approve Ordinance No. 510 amending Mounds View City Code to grant City
Administrator appointing authority for seasonal and temporary employment.
ORDINANCE NO. 510
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF MOUNDS
VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 6 ENTITLED "PERSONNEL"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. Chapter 6 .05, Appointments, shall be amended by
deleting the following:
"all probationary, temporary and regular appointmcntc to
municipal ccrvice chall be made by the appointing authority, "
and adding the following:
"all probationary full-time and part-time employees
appointed to municipal service shall be appointed by the Appointing
Authority" , and
"all temporary and seasonal employees appointed to
municipal service shall be appointed by the City Administrator" .
Read by the City Council of the—City of Mounds View this8th
day of June, 1992 .
Read and passed by the City Council of the City- of Mounds View
this day of , 1992 .
ATTEST:
MAYOR
(SEAL)
ADMINISTRATOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 6 •
FIFES Report Number: 92-288WS
STAFF REPORTMI n AGENDA SESSION DATE JUNE 1, 1992 Report Date: 5/28/92
DISPOSITION
Item Description: CONVERSION OF CITY HALL LIGHTING
Administrator's Review/Recommendation: \
- No comments to supplement this report \\\\(!
- Comments attached. / —
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sets as necessary.)
SUMMARY;
Per Council request at the May 26, 1992 Council Meeting, staff has
received the following figures from NSP regarding the conversion of the
lighting system at City Hall:
Amount to be financed after rebates $6, 318. 00
Interest at 9 percent through NSP 837.69
Staff is seeking direction from the Council to either:
. Finance the lighting
. Pay the full amount up front
Staff will be present at the meeting to answer any questions or concerns
that might arise.
i e Ulrich, Public Works Foreman
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends financing through NSP instead of obtaining the funds
from the Contingency Account
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL ULRICH, PUBLIC WORKS FOREMAN
DATE: MAY 21, 1992
RE: LIGHTING OF THE CITY HALL BUILDING
I have been working with Ron Griffith, an energy representative
from NSP in re•ards to u••radin• the li•ht fixtures inside of
City Hall. Many of the existing fixtures are original and
extremely inefficient. After surveying the building with a light
contractor, the City was provided with a summary of the existing
fixtures and costs for operation in comparison to energy
efficient ballasts and lamps.
Without getting into great detail about the savings of individual
fixtures, estimated annual savings based on current rates will be
approximately $2,700. 00 per year. There are also some "hidden"
savings; reduced number of ballasts and longer life (25 year
life) , reduced lamp life (4-5 year life) , lower wattage lamps
produce less heat, therefore, less air conditioning will be
needed.
The financing of this project can be handled in two ways. The
first is to pay for the upgrade up front with City funds
(approximately $10, 000. 00) or secondly, to finance it through
NSP. Should Council select the finance option, NSP will apply
the reduction of energy used plus the initial rebate to the
City's existing electric bill. Consequently, the City's electric
bill will not reflect any increase, other than future rate
increases. After the City pays for the upgrade, the bills will
be reduced, reflecting the savings. As you might recall, the
City did something very similar to this with the LP gas tank.
am requesting your input, approval (if so desired) and method
of financing preferred. If approval is grated immediately,
purchase of the materials can be made prior to the introduction
of the Minnesota Sales Tax.
I will be presenting this under staff reports. If you have any
questions or comments, please call. I also will be in attendance
to answer any questions you might have.
•
,item 1
0 . • .
APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY GROUPS
•.
Group app1i� a For). fia-k. = Ia 1e_ 4-0- c't___, ,
Second Choice ( if any) :
Full �y_ame (print or t p , �a/22��
/1 , Dot
Address ba Lr. /, , , G _4
Years xt This A•dress : Years You Have Live In Mounds View:
Is-
Work or Other:
Telephone: Home: _
7�'i9 -- 3 S-1 t
QUALIFICATIONS YOU WANT TO HAVE THE COUNCIL CONSIDER
Skills and In erests - , a
Employment, Occupation 9F Other Experience: -
ill • pet...,..t I EA!: rot.., 6_0-,),)•?_.-,,-1 4:: fav_4_,-t tAA-,..1 Ctt--rn"--rlr'--t-"--e---e-' %.1- 0:4A----1-41 111 l
77-1 -1 A)Li-W4441,-) 44-j-A1-3-'t-49-4^ t a.1,1-,t/tet-^---•-4( ( , .
Memberships, Accomplishments O�� QtLA ualifications:
1.,�, y `
Please State Your Reasons For Wanting To Serve On This
, Committee:
p
Your response to any of the above may be continued on the back •
and you may attach any other materials which you want the Council
to consider. ;2_7 ,�
4i �►m Date
Signature "A �`
The City of findS-VIe- -Is-comm-i-tted-to_the_policy
that all
persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, an
employment without regard to race , creed, color, -sex, age ,
1110 national origin, or handicap.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section:
ONJ�9D�
STAFF REPORT Report Number:
AGENDA SESSION DATE Report Date:
DISPOSITION
Item Description: Information Only
Administrator's Review/Recommendation:
- No comments to supplement this report
- Comments attached.
Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.)
SUMMARY:
The Mounds View Planning Commission, at their regularly scheduled June 3, 1992 meeting, will be taking formal
action on the requested development project known as Greenfield Estates. The current proposal includes a
subdivision creating 13 single family lots as well as work in a City delineated wetland. Two informational
meetings have been held at the Planning Commission level to provide the public with an opportunity to present
their comments.
Following the Planning Commissions' action on Wednesday, their recommendation will be forwarded to you for
your review and action on the proposal. Tentatively, I have scheduled June 8 for the first review of the request at
the Council level.
This item is being provided on an informational basis. Additional information - including the application
submittal and all appropriate plans -will be provided prior to the June 8 City Council Meeting.
..der Z.
Paul Harrington, Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
e
6,cerA/P/FL� ,»#/`7r ,c ?opar
az7r
ti4 -,r $ .. _�1-.F R W O O f)
2643.56 -_ 99,`�G --ROAD - - - - - - -
• � � � � 1 8f
1 7 GD IIB.52 � 95 i
8 85 T-s::'.. ,23.Y9 3 c3 90 -o 1 (' (1) 0
SS • Et (9)9f•-•_.! I {�� A
40 (49; 0 7 4 3 2 "U5) I �� 6 7 6 ESnI 3 2 1 12s8�
`� (16) 1(15) (14) 4l� o �2'p 4 (2) 1 , i• i 4
(SCI (51) - '? p 00) (5) (7) (0)1 i (5) (4) I (3) • as
°
(48) (16)E 7 '-, - M.V. PARK '�'g
39 5
tea.. •
��.
O (15) 1 I p1) 12 µr- s .
.17..______3
t 39 .E+.. (IZ) ,, p3) Gz) (u,
) ,C4-1) N GREENFIELD - - _.ate_ \ 04) Y 13 12
r ,
p 38 c PLACEER (IS) 14
2G 142 14Z GO b �? 15 •
Z.w
9 23 s gig \ typo M.V. PARK (20) 16 `� ' D�
G3i (41)
(4G) (GZi Q IMIR ` `A 17 O 6
(42)3) 37 - $ 22 m 2IN 40) (�) -' `.(zJ) :.
iv
21 m 3 o (Sc
4) (45) 3 6 I m O (43) - 31 ) • y (23) .� 19 ?� . 7 ( )• •• o`g.F
(co) izi d (24) 20 B (24).•
L3.. t°30
0 28
(3,)
m �' 20 rn04) a 30 _D1, .10 (as) 21 e�� (15) .•6 •
27 •
(44) 3 5 _ 03 i 9 (se)- 5 u (33) (39) z.. (23 .•2 2 i'°'(I Ot (zs) (30)
ss) 4. 2 6
29 y
(50) (45) (37„) •
1 v?' 5• ? (72) p (.8) °.25 /
18 = (4GJ 6 , • 0 26 ; ,• • 1I S", r 24 to
3G) (43) 5 J (31) 'I esoi
•..ap a5 1 2 , n....3 4 = 17(s,_ 7 wI . 'P - 13 (73) ,.• (t7) _ • 11
1lin1.78ao. , _ 12 (
SG,,[47) •I •I • IS 14 • (,4) _ r 44,
/� (75) p -vak (45)
X37) (42) 16 _. P a Z 26 M.V.PARK ► y ,� (7W •
&) �� 13
3 3 = i (ss; '_ —� w (zs) w, v� :o A• .(713)*.
t9) ($0)VO %. •'' 14• :•(44)
1' vV
IS = 9 Q 25 3b) ;I 16 - 17. IB I (47)
,3t� -.4.) I In 14 • (50 135 T 1 E s`.44 o I f 6 ..,-(4s)
`
32 - m o ., 4 > e
Z X10 � 2q _ za '?(�).
s'
1 Int, 1. .1 ' :‘1......
1 S (40) .39, a''T 1 • 'n 11(5) I ,l _ I� 2 I • .0(SO)tt .•2i
•
(1) - ow 09) (GG) (G5) (G4,
i
• rt, '4-a111 .A dC- • -• Io2..•
II o en
R E}' ro • .04 (5). . (G) (7) CP) UO��
1
ono
3p� y"_..,�! 90 n0 asp. 1 2 3 6 2 i� • 13 •
•
�C'E' ."'0"
,
(3t)1 (41) 51 OAK WOOD D R. o (1w (INNINI`17� ��
1 GO Go q i
I (79)I ) y°) 125 24 . {'— \ 1 p 17 18 • 19 20
0' �'/raj (3b) •F 1 . ' N�' [,6) 1
'c es
(n laT)
• m 2 O . 4111
-�Om�G 5(b3) in23 m :' 2 aOA-K-WAO
1 (Bo �41 (9z)• '.aG ao -
3 .; �.q [50) n we
• q I,) 22 3 16 I4 13
3�.s 130 � 3
f (4Z)a 1 11111
l4 s) q
—� (441 (44)
I
m 1 (47) :a
133 M Q = !.1t_..... - ' -' t.51)
.. (4e) (4^J)
) a 2 O Q (,5) 4('`Z) N i 17 IB 20+
z�.., 3 0 0 _ A Eli Illiii -143) ,
w 6 19 6(5� TERRACE ,_ -
5.4. .33.36 J 6
3 3 (45) F ' • . •„ (1) Q C29 42
x (50) E D W� DIS a 1. •,w
10 O
o � M 4 g o 1 v 19 n 18 ^ 17-� 16"N 7 V •
18 0 ,6; 15 �, 14 13 •.
I 3 (4G) 1 N (78) a (77)N (74) Z r.(75)" (74) .,2'S` _ (,0 (r�) (ie) (07 ( )
T - 5 (51) DRFINA6 cs•nr .•5 re.. \ ^I g B r 17 (8z) CBj)
133.3. - 90- -90-- 454 14 r (go)
�).
CG9) ((,� 180... (H) N (5G) 20
GO 19
a 6 4. .. PINEWOOD CIRCLE „S23)a (Lc'9 = 9 16 Z 9 - 17
8 ,Iz> (4i) 1. I30 •
90 90 50 R:6° b :5 s.) (5) • •= 1r• ' 3
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: SAMANTHA ORDUNO, CITY ADMINISTRATE
DATE: JUNE 1 , 1992
RE: INDEX FOR WEEK OF JUNE 1, 1992 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF JUNE 1 , 1992
. Monday, June 1 , 1992, Work Session,
7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers
ITEMS PROVIDED IN THIS WEEK'S COUNCIL WORK SESSION
PACKET
. This Is It!
. Agenda
ADMINISTRATOR'S SCHEDULE
(Please note that this schedule is subject to change as
meetings are scheduled, rescheduled or cancelled. At any time
Audrey, Michele, or Tim C. will have my most current schedule
and a number where I can be reached at all times.)
Monday, June 1
7:00 p.m. Council Meeting
Tuesday, June 2
9:00 Department Head Meeting
11 :00 Administrative Staff Meeting
NOON Luncheon - Pay Equity Program - Maple
Grove
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PAGE TWO
JUNE 1 , 1992
Wednesday, June 3
NOON Luncheon with Del Palachek, Multi Tech
Thursday, June 4
NOON Luncheon with Ralph Campbell - Re:
Computer Budget Software
Friday, June 5
DAY OFF