Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1991/12/02 ....... . ........ EEER:: .,.: 9':.:... is•COCOUNCIL: OR... ..: .ESSi 7:00 P.M. 1 . Annual Photo Contest Judging 2. Presentation by Everest Development Ltd. 3. Discussion of Proposed Emergency Access for Town's Edge Terrace Mobile Home Park 4. Continued 1992 Budget Discussion . Water/Sewer Budgets . Budget Video 5. Continued Discussion of Pay Equity Program (As Requestedby Councilor mber Rickaby) 6. Discussion of Appreciation Dinner (As Requested by Councilmember Quick) 7. Continued Discussion Regarding Outdoor Concerts/Alcohol Policy 8. Department Reports 9. Viewing of Senior Center Video Agenda Section: 1. 00mDDs REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 91-118WS STAFF REPORT Report Date: 11-2 7-91 �GW Council Action: ❑ Special Order of Business CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE 19- ',-9 a..... ❑ Public Hearings ❑ Consent Agenda ❑ Council Business Item Description: A n nue-LI ►P11ato Cov --te54. auLacA""% Administrator's Review/Recommendation: �Q� - No comments to supplement this report Ate^' - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; The annual photo contest judging will take place on Monday, December 2 , 1991. The City Council and Department Heads are asked to vote for six pictures to be used in the 1992 issues of the Mounds View City Newsletter. Staff will number and display each photo and group them according to season. Ballots for voting will be distributed at the meeting. If you have any questions, please contact me prior to the meeting. /, `/ l,1,2, Sharie Linke, Ad . .nistrative Asst. Parks, Recreation and Forestry RECOMMENDATION; REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 2 'VS STAFF REPORT Report Number: 91-119WS � AGENDA SESSION DATE DECEMBER 2 , 1991 Report Date: 11-27-91 DISPOSITION Item Description: PRESENTATION BY EVEREST DEVELOPMENT REGARDING PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FOR THE LOOSE ENDS SITE Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - No comments to supplement this report - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY; Representatives of Everest Development met briefly with City staff last week and again today to discuss a proposed development for the Loose Ends site. Everest is working in conjunction with the Saturn Corporation to construct a "satellite dealership" on the site. Saturn's concept is to provide one or two large dealerships in centralized areas in the Metro area and construct smaller, area specific, operations in suburban communities . The satellite operations include a showroom floor which accommodates one new Saturn automobile, offices, general lobby/reception area and two "maintenance bays" . Saturn provides general service maintenance in the form of oil changes, tune-ups and other short term maintenance activities . Saturn's policy of providing general service maintenance on site poses concerns in that the building will include 2 large garage door bays for oil and other fluid changes. The drawings which were shown to staff indicated that the bay doors would be on the front side of the building facing Highway 10 . The general maintenance activity and its emphasis, both from a visual and actual activity perspective, may pose image concerns and be inconsistent with the Year 2000 plans for Highway 10 . The plan would utilize the existing building (with modifications) and provide for approximately 123 parking- spaces,_ approximately 100 of the spaces are for their new and used car inventory. As a new car dealership, Saturn will carry an inventory of used cars which have been traded in for new cars and will be sold on the site. Everest has also proposed construction of a road behind the proposed Saturn dealership which would connect at Jackson and cut through the Business Park. The road, if constructed, could have a significant negative impact on the surrouncring-neighborhood. Representatives from Everest and the Saturn Corporation will be present Monday night for the presentation. RECOMMENDATION; Samantha Orduno, City Administrator REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 3• 00M�D� STAFF REPORT Report Number: 91-12OWS EW DECEMBER 2, 1991 Report Date: 11-27-91 AGENDA SESSION DATE DISPOSITION Item Description: SECOND ACCESS., TOWNS EDGE TERRACE Administrator's Review/Recommendation: j _ - No comments to supplement this report 7�/�AO' - Comments attached. _ Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY: • In 1976, Bauer Welding, 2159 Mustang Drive, was given City approval for the construction of their present facility. At that time, Bauer and the City entered into a Development Agreement for the project. One condition of that Development Agreement was that Bauer construct and maintain a road across their property to serve as a second access to Townsedge Terrace Mobile Home Park. This road was never constructed. In 1982, Bauer expanded their facilities and entered into an amendment to the original Development Agreement. Reference to the road was not made in the amendment. Bauer Welding contends that because no reference to the road was made in the 1982 amendment, they are not responsible for construction of the road. Our attorney says that the action entered into in 1982 was an amendment to the original Development Agreement and that all conditions of that document are still enforceable. At present, construction of the road has not occurred. As per Council request, staff has referred this item to both the Fire and Police Departments for their review and comment on the potential need for a second access to Townsedge TPrr_ac_e_Mobil_e_H 'a the BauPr sJ tP. A copy of the Fire Departments' comments are attached for your review. Police Chief Ramacher has indicated that he will be available for comment at the December- -- 2, 1991 Council Work Session. If you have any questions regarding this issue, please feel free to give me a call. C-- 1 Harrington, CitIr Planner RECOMMENDATION: ------, / ie---7 cr• , (-2 , e,k),)1,s i C /41,1 ( 1 1 'I \ I i, 1, I \ i it = k•-:::::,,c,try Illikli 2/5'9 PA \I \ _ , 1 \ ; / LC14 4-t;---.'-' rs 1/ — .1 )0 ... \ ........ rit/ rxi Ai , /sy0G LAKE PAR .. K BLAINEA_ HEADQUARTERS MOUNDS VIEW 1810 Highway 10 ii. 0 g Spring Lake Park, Minnesota 55432 FIRE DEPT. loz 22 2.3242 st 9yQy � ac r i�# 90r 0., November 22, 1991 0 Attn: Paul Harrington, Planner 0/6,8L9sb£l.. City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 RE: Second Access Townsedge Terrace Mobile Home Park Dear Paul: Because the original construction of the Bauer Welding building occurred in 1976, we no longer have any records as to what was discussed. During this fifteen year period, we have never had an occasion to utilize a second entrance if one were available. The fire department's policy is that a minimum of two entranceways be provided at all mobile home parks. Having recently inspected the original roadway as proposed on the Bauer site, it is my opinion that this roadway would be unworkable for our present apparatus and we would be unable to use it. The minimum full and clear road width we require for fire apparatus is 24 feet. If this cannot be provided on the Bauer property, then I suggest that a search be made to locate a second entrance to Townsedge Terrace. Yo - very truly, Ron Fagers/om Chief of Department RF/ke U<' ..�;.:.y h ,*;:'1!:;:c, z ! rt} '^t w,i 1 .' y , p.„ k 1 e�t�4,-- �.. +� 30-:•:11014'V.-:;--r:-. ; ,h�t ,^,y2�4-_q.' `a K � .a i `�%$ fi �F cf?� ��'�� R� �,x ;� ,f :T a� :3v �g}�. .k �� ,�, �.� � 4.,;.� t �,v�� :�� t '-�}h* !• T. ..4�{ t.)`�_�":p. � -t'4`y,e��i�'� �`3-:� ".:4-.;� _ � ti� � r� ,'_� }�,�..� '.i: 4:,}+�3t ek{?- yx.:. { a' 'tE §'- -� -+ - �p :` k3-tt. 3s c•z _ �%1y.p y."' r�#. y4e `r.rz r' kt;. r +• •!'+�,'dy1444 z a<rF r .r u,,,. ._. `r�zs..�..'_•:_.':.w' _.=.:1:t .'':.. ,':_d -.:,,t,1,5,,,,1`.:.1. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 7 • 1111706 91-121WS STAFF REPORT Report Number: W° Report Date: 11-27-91 AGENDA SESSION DATE DECEMBER 2, 1991 DISPOSITION Item Description: REGULATION OF OUTDOOR CONCERTS Administrator's Review/Recommendation: ((�� - No comments to supplement this report SIZAD- - Comments attached. Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) SUMMARY The following outline provides for more specific possibilities with regard to regulating outdoor concerts: 1. Outdoor Alcohol Consumption Chapter 100 of the City Code currently prohibits the possession and consumption of alcohol in parking lots and other outdoor areas of on- and off-sale liquor establishments. This part of the code has not been enforced at outdoor concerts . If the Council decides to continue to allow alcohol at outdoor concerts, the Code should be amended to reflect this. A temporary permit could be issued which would allow outdoor alcohol consumption under certain conditions . Some conditions that might be required include the complete fencing of the area in which the alcohol is to be served and a ban on glass containers in the outdoor area. 2 . Hours of Operation In order to remain consistent with the Nuisance section of the Code, any outdoor concert should be required to end by 10:00 p.m. 3. Noise Noise is an extremelydifficultaspect of outdoor Concerts to regulate. A maximum decibel level could be set, but enforcement of that maximum becomes problematic, as the City would need to purchase measuring devices and to train staff in its use. Determining a maximum level would be difficult as well, since intolerable vol = subjective determination. ' :ul Harrington,7City Planner RECOMMENDATIONz