Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 2006/06/26 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MOUNDS VIEW CITY HALL Monday, June 26, 2006 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL: Marty, Stigney, Gunn, Flaherty, Thomas 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 5. PUBLIC INPUT: Citizens may speak to issues not on tonight’s agenda. Before speaking, please give your full name and address for the minutes. Also, please limit your comments to three minutes. 6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. 7:05 pm Public Hearing, Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 773, an Ordinance Amending the Zoning Code Relating to Landscaping, Fences and Retaining Walls (ROLL CALL VOTE) B. 7:10 pm Public Hearing to Consider a Rezoning Request Submitted by Integra Homes Relating to the Properties at 2901 and 2925 County Road 10 and the West Half of 8060 Groveland Road to R-3, Medium Density Residential C. 7:15 pm Public Hearing Resolution 6857, Consider a Conditional Use Permit and Development Review for Midwest Motor Express located at 2169 Mustang Drive. D. Continued Public Hearing from June 12, 2006, to consider Resolution 6830 an Off Sale intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for ABC Liquor located at 2840 Highway 10. E. Continued Public Hearing from June 12, 2006, to consider Resolution 6833 an On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment located at 2400 County Road H2. F. Resolution 6852 Approving Rotary Club Membership. G. Resolution 6860 Approving Change Orders No. 27 through 34 for the City Hall Rehabilitation Project. H. Resolution 6866 Including Various Items in the Feasibility Report for the Street and Utility Improvement Program / Public Informational Meeting Update I. Resolution 6853 Authorizing the Contract for Architectural Services for the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Mounds View Community Center J. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 775, an Ordinance Vacating an Excess Highway Easement Associated with the Hidden Hollow South Residential Subdivision K. Resolution 6863 Approving the Communications Coordinator to attend the NATOA Conference in Florida. L. Resolution 6894 Approving Compensation Amounts for Easement Acquisition and Authorization to Execute Easements for the Silver Lake Road Sidewalk Improvement Project M. Resolution 6895 Approving a Tobacco-Free Park Policy N. Resolution 6867 Approving the Hire of Ben Knitter as Police Officer 8. CONSENT AGENDA A. Resolution 6854, Approving the 2006-2007 Mounds View Business Licenses B. Licenses for Approval C. Set a Public Hearing for Monday, July 10, 2006 at 7:05 pm to consider an Interim Use Permit (IUP) for a Billboard at 2200 County Road 10 June 26, 2006 City Council Agenda Page 2 8. CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) D. Set a Public Hearing for Monday, July 10, 2006 at 7:10 pm to consider an Interim Use Permit (IUP) for a Billboard at 5201 Program Avenue E. Resolution 6855 Approving Contract for Legal Services with Kennedy and Graven F. Resolution 6856 a Resolution Authorizing the Distribution of Service Appreciation Certificates to Employees having Achieved a Five Year Employment Milestone as of 2006. G. Resolution 6861 Approving a Charitable Gambling One-Day Permit for the Mounds View Community Theatre for the August 20, 2006 Mounds View Festival in the Park. H. Set a Public Hearing for Monday, July 10, 2006 at 7:15 pm to Consider the Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance to Vacate an Excess Highway Easement Associated with the Hidden Hollow South Major Subdivision. I. Set a Public Hearing for Monday, July 10, 2006 at 7:20 pm to Consider an Outdoor Liquor Consumption Endorsement for Moe’s located at 2400 Highway 10 in Mounds View. J. Set a Public Hearing for Monday, July 10, 2006 at 7:25 pm to Consider an Appeal of a Variance Denial for 2,468 Square Feet of Accessory Storage Space at 8135 Long Lake Rd. K. Set a Public Hearing for Monday, July 10, 2006 at 7:30 pm to Consider a PUD Amendment Request from LandCor Regarding the Property Located at 2442 County Road 10. 9. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS 10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Minutes, June 12, 2006. 11. REPORTS A. Reports of Mayor and Council B. Reports of Staff 1. Random Park Building Replacement Project Update C. Reports of City Attorney 12. Next Council Work Session: Monday, July 17, 2006 at 7pm Next Council Meeting: Monday, July 10, 2006 at 7pm Item No: 7A Meeting Date: June 26, 2006 Type of Business: PH & CB Administrator Review: ______ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: James Ericson, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing, Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 773, an Ordinance Amending Chapters 1102 and 1103 of the Mounds View Zoning Code Relating to Fences, Retaining Walls and Landscaping Introduction: The City Council asked the Planning Commission to examine the Zoning Code relative to fences, retaining walls and terraces, and to provide a recommendation as to potential Code amendments, if any are deemed appropriate. On April 19, 2006, Staff provided the Commission with detailed information and examples of how other communities define fences, retaining walls and terraces and provided the Commission with a variety of Code excerpts, handouts and requirements from our neighboring nearby communities for reference. Also included for information purposes were photos depicting fences, retaining walls and terraces. The Planning Commission reviewed the sections of Mounds View’s code relating to fences, terraces and retaining walls. As a result of that discussion, staff was directed to prepare an amendment to the Code to define retaining walls and to provide for language that would clarify retaining wall setbacks. At this same meeting, the Commission chose to leave the language pertaining to fences and terraces relatively unchanged. The Planning Commission adopted a resolution on May 17, 2006 which recommends such an amendment for the City Council’s consideration. Discussion: Based upon the direction at the April 19th and May 3rd Planning Commission meetings, staff prepared language that would amend Chapters 1102 and 1103 of the Zoning Code. In addition to adding a definition for “Retaining Walls”, staff suggested adding a definition for “Landscaping”, which is an undefined requirement in Chapter 1103. A final change considered was the addition of a new subdivision articulating “Prohibited Materials” such as barbed wire, razor wire, or fences wired or designed to conduct and emit electrical charges. The City Council considered the first reading of the ordinance on June 12, 2006. One resident asked specific questions about the ordinance and then later suggested a change that would explicitly state that retaining walls and fences have no setback as long as they were not sited directly over a property line. This suggestion has been incorporated into the ordinance and represents the only change from the first reading, which was approved on June 12. Ord 773 Report June 26, 2006 Page 2 Recommendation: Staff and the Mounds View Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 773, an ordinance amending Chapters 1102 and 1103 of the Mounds View Zoning Code relating to Fences, Retaining Walls and Landscaping, and approve the publication of the ordinance “summary” as permitted by the Mounds View Charter. _____________________________________ James Ericson Community Development Director ORDINANCE SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 773 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTERS 1102 and 1103 RELATING TO FENCES, RETAINING WALLS AND LANDSCAPING On June 26, 2006, the Mounds View City Council adopted an ordinance which amends Chapters 1102 and 1103 of the Zoning Code relating to fences, landscaping and retaining walls. The amendment adds definitions to the Zoning Code pertaining to landscaping and retaining walls, clarifies the locations which retaining walls and fences can be sited on a property and adds a section that prohibits certain types of fencing materials such as barbed wire, razor wire, electric fences or other fences that could pose a public safety hazard. The full and complete text of this ordinance along with a supplemental map is on file at the office of the Clerk Administrator and is posted in its entirety on the City’s website, located at www.ci.mounds-view.mn.us/ords/773.pdf. Kurt Ulrich, City Clerk-Administrator ORDINANCE NO. 773 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 1102 AND 1103 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW ZONING CODE RELATING TO FENCES, RETAINING WALLS AND LANDSCAPING THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 1102.02 of the Mounds View Zoning Code pertaining to “Definitions” is hereby amended with the proposed additions underlined: 1102.02: DEFINITIONS: The following words and terms, wherever they occur in this Code, shall be defined as follows: Subd. 58.5. LANDSCAPING: The aesthetic and physical improvement of land by the addition of berms, trees, shrubs, ground cover, crushed rock, wood chips, retaining walls and other functional, ornamental or decorative features. Subd. 100.5. RETAINING WALL: A wall or structure constructed of stone, concrete, wood, or other materials, used to retain soil, as a slope transition, or edge of a planting area. SECTION 2. Section 1103.08 of the Mounds View Zoning Code pertaining to “Fencing Screening and Landscaping” is hereby amended with the proposed additions underlined: 1103.08: FENCING, RETAINING WALLS, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: Subd. 1. Height: No fence shall exceed eight feet (8') in height, and in the case of grade separation, such as the division of properties by a retaining wall, the height shall be determined on the basis of measurement from the average point between the highest and lowest grade. Subd. 2. Intersections: No fences, structures or planting of trees or shrubs shall be permitted within thirty feet (30') of any corner formed by the intersection of street property lines or the right of way of a railway intersecting a street, except properly constructed chain link fences. Such chain link fences shall not exceed forty eight inches (48") in height from the grade level at the lot line and shall have openings in the wire mesh of not less than one and five-eighths inches (1-5/8") nor more than two and one-fourth inches (2-1/4"). Such fences may follow the lot line to the lot corner. The thirty feet (30') restriction noted above shall consist of the triangle formed by connecting the two (2) points on intersecting lot lines that are each thirty feet (30') from the lot corner. Ordinance 773 Page 2 Subd. 3. Location: a. Except as provided in subdivision 2 above, fences not to exceed forty eight inches (48") in height may be located on any part of a lot. Fences not to exceed ninety six inches (96") in height may be erected on any part of a lot behind the front line of the principal building. The City Council may require or approve fencing up to ninety six inches (96") in height in a front yard to satisfy a buffer or screening condition of a development review or conditional use permit. (Ord. 658, 8-14-00) b. A fence or retaining wall shall be installed on the applicant's property. The fence or retaining wall shall not be installed directly over the property line but shall not otherwise be subject to a setback requirement. Subd. 4. Landscaping Required: In all zoning districts, the lot area remaining after providing for off- street parking, off-street loading, sidewalks, driveway, building site and/or other requirements shall be planted and maintained in grass, sodding, shrubs or other acceptable vegetation or treatment generally used in landscaping. Subd. 5. Surface of Fences: Any fence shall be so constructed that the surface facing adjoining properties or public rights of way shall be of finished construction. Subd. 6. Required Screening: The fencing and screening required by this Title shall be subject to subdivisions 1 through 5 hereof and shall consist of either a fence or a green belt planting strip the height of which shall be sufficient to adequately shield the activity from the abutting properties. a. A green belt planting strip shall consist of evergreen ground cover and shall be of sufficient width and density to provide an effective screen. This planting strip shall contain no structures or other use. Such planting strips shall not be less than eight feet (8') in height. Earth mounding or berms may be used but shall be limited to an average of five feet (5') of the height of the required screen. The planting plan and type of shrub shall require the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission based upon a recommendation of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer and Building Inspector. b. A required screening fence shall be constructed of masonry, brick, wood or steel. Such fence shall provide a solid screening effect and not exceed eight feet (8') in height or be less than six feet (6') in height. The design and materials used in constructing a required screening fence shall be subject to the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission based upon a recommendation by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer and Building Inspector. c. Ground cover shall be established within one (1) year following issuance of the building permit. Ground cover material shall be of such type as to control erosion. (1988 Code §40.04) Subd. 7. Prohibited Materials: a. Barbed wire, razor wire or other materials which could cause bodily harm shall be prohibited, and no fence or property shall be wired and designed to conduct and emit an electrical charge, except as allowed for below. Ordinance 773 Page 3 b. Exceptions: Facilities providing essential services or municipal and governmental services may erect barbed wire, or other materials having a similar deterrence, upon notice to properties within 350 feet and upon approval of the City Council. SECTION 3. This ordinance is effective 30 days after its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this 12th day of June, 2006. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 26th day of June, 2006. Rob Marty, Mayor ATTEST: Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Item No. 07D Type of Business: PH & CB Meeting Date: June 26, 2006 City Administrator Review: ______ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Desaree Crane, Assistant to the City Administrator Item Title/Subject: Continued Public Hearing to Consider Resolution 6830, a Resolution Approving An Intoxicating Liquor Business License (Off-Sale) for ABC Liquor located at 2840 Highway 10 At the June 12, 2006, City Council Meeting, a Public Hearing to consider Resolution 6830, a Resolution approving an Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for ABC Liquor was opened and closed for public comment. Mr. Xiong, the owner of ABC Liquor was the only person that spoke to the City Council in regard to this renewal. At the June 12, 2006, City Council Meeting, the City Council was made aware of a Police Report, which indicated a violation with regard to selling alcohol to minors. This is the establishment’s first violation on record. Mr. Xiong spoke to the City Council at the June 12th meeting about the events on the Police Report. It was the City Council’s recommendation to table this Off-Sale Intoxicating License renewal until the City Attorney was available to able answer questions from the City Council. Attached is the Police Report, along with the Memorandum from Bob Vose of Kennedy and Graven for your information. The Mounds View City Attorney will be present at this Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council ask the necessary questions about this police report to the City Attorney. Mr. Xiong, the owner of ABC Liquor will be present at this City Council meeting to answer any additional questions. Since this is a first violation with the owner, and the owner is not currently convicted, we could proceed with the renewal and monitor the proceedings of the case. A Resolution approving this license is attached if the Council wishes to approve the liquor license. If this renewal is approved, the time period of this license will be July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. Respectfully Submitted, Desaree Crane RESOLUTION 6830 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA Resolution Approving an Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for ABC Liquor WHEREAS, ABC Liquor’s Intoxicating Liquor License expires June 30, 2006; and WHEREAS, all City of Mounds View business licenses must be approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, all necessary inspections for the establishment have been conducted, and the establishment satisfies all requirements; and WHEREAS, staff recommends approval of ABC Liquor’s Intoxicating Liquor License. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council does hereby approve an Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for ABC Liquor for the period of July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. Adopted this 26th day of June, 2006. ________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator (seal) Item No. 07E Type of Business: PH & CB Meeting Date: June 26, 2006 City Administrator Review: ______ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Desaree Crane, Assistant to the City Administrator Item Title/Subject: Continued Public Hearing to Consider Resolution 6833, a Resolution Approving An Intoxicating Liquor Business License (On-Sale) for Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment located at 2400 County Road H2 At the June 12, 2006, City Council Meeting, a Public Hearing to consider Resolution 6833, a Resolution approving an On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment was opened and closed for public comment. A number of residents were present to discuss to the Council potential noise violations at this establishment. Attached are the minutes from June 12, 2006, outlining these noise concerns from residents. The owner of Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment, Greg Waste, along with his attorney, will be present at this meeting to discuss these noise issues and answer any questions you may have. Attached are police call reports from Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment for your reference. The time period of these reports are from January 1, 2005 to June 13, 2006. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council ask the necessary questions about these noise complaints expressed by the residents at the June 12, 2006 City Council Meeting. Staff recommends approving Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment’s application for an On- Sale Intoxicating Liquor License pending a satisfactory inspection from the Mounds View Fire Marshal and receipt of the Certificate of Liability Insurance. The time period for this license will be July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. Respectfully Submitted, Desaree Crane RESOLUTION 6833 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA Resolution Approving an On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment WHEREAS, Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment’s Intoxicating Liquor License expires June 30, 2006; and WHEREAS, all City of Mounds View business licenses must be approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, all necessary inspections for the establishment have been conducted and with the exception of a fire inspection from the Mounds View Fire Marshal, the establishment satisfies all requirements; and WHEREAS, staff recommends approval of Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment’s Intoxicating Liquor License pending a satisfactory fire inspection from the Mounds View Fire Marshal and receipt of their Certificate of Liability Insurance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council does hereby approve an On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment for the time period of July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007, pending a satisfactory fire inspection from the Mounds View Fire Marshal and receipt of their Certificate of Liability Insurance. Adopted this 26th day of June, 2006. ________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator (seal) Item No: 7F Meeting Date: 06/26/06 Type of Business: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator Item Title/Subject: Resolution 6852 Approving Rotary Club Membership Background: This item was discussed at the City Council work session of July 5th. The consensus of the Council at that time was to invite the President of the New Brighton/Mounds View Rotary Club, Mr. George Winieki, to a Council meeting to introduce him, answer questions, and to explain the benefits of Rotary membership. Discussion: It is requested that consideration be given to sponsoring the City Administrator’s membership in the New Brighton/Mounds View Rotary Club. The New Brighton/Mounds View Rotary Club is part of the international organization of community leaders within the Twin Cities area. Rotary Club members “lead and participate in strategic humanitarian and community projects; encourage high ethical standards in all vocations; and help build goodwill and peace in the community.” Attached is more information about Rotary and the benefits of club membership. Membership would provide an important connection for the City, including additional access to the business community, volunteers, and other resources. The cost of membership would be $434 for the balance of 2006. The funds would come from existing allocations within the Administration budget. In the 2007 budget, $868 would be proposed specifically for the Rotary Club membership. The membership in Rotary will entail a weekly luncheon, and other volunteer time for activities that would be required throughout the year. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution 6852 Approving a Rotary Club Membership and authorizing reallocation of related funding in the 2006 budget. RESOLUTION NO. 6852 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING ROTARY CLUB MEMBERSHIP WHEREAS, the City’s adopted goals for the year include to “Improve communications with the public” and to “Improve the effectiveness in delivery of services”; and WHEREAS, the New Brighton/Mounds View Rotary Club is part of the international organization of community leaders within the Twin Cities area and Rotary Club members “lead and participate in strategic humanitarian and community projects; encourage high ethical standards in all vocations; and help build goodwill and peace in the community”; and WHEREAS, membership in the New Brighton/Mounds View Rotary Club would provide an important connection for the City, including additional access to the business community, volunteers, and other resources, positively affecting communications and the delivery of services to the community; and WHEREAS, the cost of membership would be $434 for the balance of 2006, that would be reallocated out of the current administrative budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota that the City Administrator is hereby authorized to join the New Brighton/Mounds View Rotary Club as a representative of the City and to reallocate funds within the 2006 administrative budget for said purpose. Adopted this 26th day of June 2006. (ATTEST) ____________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor (SEAL) ____________________________________ Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator Item No. 7I Meeting Date: June 26, 2006 Type of Business: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator Item Title/Subject: Resolution 6853 Authorizing the Contract for Architectural Services for the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Mounds View Community Center Background: On June 5, 2006, the City Council, at a Work Session, reviewed the proposed improvements to the Mounds View Community Center, which included design concept and development level plans. The Mounds View Community Center Task Force presented its initial report to the City Council on March 6, 2006. Based on that report, the City Council acted to hire DSGW Architects, Inc. to conduct a study of the task force recommendations. The architect from DSGW, Randy Wagner, worked with the Mounds View Community Center Task Force, the YMCA, and City staff to refine the concepts, make additional recommendations, and to develop a cost estimate for the proposed improvements, estimated at $600,000 plus furniture and equipment. The next step in the process is to consider the preparation of plans and specifications in order to refine the cost estimates and to develop documents for construction bidding. Under this schedule, the City would order and review plans and specifications for the proposed project prior to holding a public hearing to order the project. Discussion: Authorize Detailed Plans and Specifications – The next step in the architectural process is to order the preparation of plans and specifications. On June 8, 2006, the architectural firm of DSGW submitted a letter of agreement to proceed with the Mounds View Community Center Project by developing detailed plans and specifications for the bidding document phase of this project. This document is attached for the City Council’s review. DSGW has offered to continue to this phase for a fee of 6% of construction costs. The estimated cost of construction for the work at the completion of Phase I is $600,000. Therefore, their fee would amount to $36,000 of which $9,000 is for supervision during the construction. To take the project through bidding only, their fee is $27,000, including fees of architectural, interior design, mechanical and electrical engineering professionals. Funding for this project was discussed at the June 5th work session. A combination of funding sources could be utilized among the following: - Special Projects Fund (current balance $2,317,405) - Park Dedication Fund (current balance $1,203,023) - Internal loans with general tax levy - Internal loans repaid with increased room rentals and memberships fees - Capital bonds It is recommended that the initial expenditure for the preparation of plans and specs be borrowed from the Special Projects Fund. Should this project proceed, the next City Council actions will be to approve the final plans and specifications and authorize for the advertisement of bids. After bids are received, this project will again be presented to the City Council for approval of an award of contract. The Council may then order the project after a public hearing has been held. Market Feasibility – Ultimately, the preferred source of funding for the proposed improvements is to repay internal loans from increased revenue generated by the facility through rentals and fees. The feasibility of generating this revenue is a key question. The attached projections of revenues and expenditures prepared by City Finance Director Mark Beer indicate that the City would need to sell approximately 400 memberships of each type (i.e., single, senior, and family) to reach a break-even point. Conversely, if no memberships were sold, the City would run a deficit of $190,538. With no changes, the Community Center is expected to run a $47,002 deficit in 2006, based on current revenue. Both these numbers already include the budgeted General Fund transfer of $142,000. It is strongly recommended that the City contract for the preparation of a market feasibility study prior to proceeding with the project. This will help determine the level of revenue the City can expect from increased memberships and the business risk associated with the project. Staff has requested proposals for a market feasibility study and a cost estimate will be available on Monday. If the City chooses to conduct such a study, the preparation of plans and specifications could be delayed until the results are analyzed. Plans and specs may be prepared concurrently with a market study in order to expedite the process. However, one reason for waiting is that the City may decide to revise or modify the project based on the market feasibility study results. Recommendation: It is recommended the City Council contract for the preparation of a market feasibility study prior to proceeding with plans and specifications. If this is not desired, Resolution 6853 Authorizing the Contract for Architectural Services for the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Mounds View Community Center is attached for consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 6853 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AUTHORIZING THE CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MOUNDS VIEW COMMUNITY CENTER WHEREAS, on June 5, 2006, the City Council, at a Work Session, reviewed the status of the City Hall Rehabilitation Project, which included design and development level plans; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2006, the architectural firm of DSGW submitted a letter of agreement to proceed with the Mounds View Community Center Project by developing detailed plans and specifications for the bidding document phase of this project; and WHEREAS, the estimated cost of construction for the work at the completion of Phase I is $600,000; and WHEREAS, the estimated DSGW fee would amount to $36,000 of which $9,000 is for supervision during the construction and to take the project through bidding only, the fee is $27,000, including fees of architectural, interior design, mechanical and electrical engineering professionals; and WHEREAS, the Special Projects Fund has sufficient funding to cover the cost of the proposed plans and specifications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows: 1. The execution of a contract for architectural services with DSGW in an estimated amount not to exceed $27,000 for the development of detailed plans and specifications for the bidding document phase of the City Hall Rehabilitation Project is hereby approved. 2. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized to execute a contract for architectural services, subject to the review of the City Attorney. 3. The estimated cost not to exceed $27,000 for development of detailed plans and specifications for the bidding document phase of the City Hall Rehabilitation Project is to be derived from the Special Project Account (Account No. 280-4180-7050). Adopted this 26th day of June 2006. (ATTEST) ____________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor (SEAL) ____________________________________ Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator June 8, 2006 Kurt Ulrich City Administrator City of Mounds View, Minnesota 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Re: Architectural professional services Dear Mr. Ulrich, Thank you for your confidence in DSGW Architects to proceed into the next phase of development of the Mounds View Community Center Remodel. The City Council has directed that plans and specifications be drafted for the purposes of bidding the project by general contractors. As per our original proposal, we offered to continue to this phase for a fee of 6% of construction costs. The estimated cost of construction for the work at the completion of Phase I is $600,000. Our fee would amount to $36,000 of which $9,000 is for supervision during the construction. Therefore to take the project through bidding only, our fee is $27,000. The professional disciplines this includes are architectural, interior design, mechanical and electrical engineering. See attached AIA Contract agreement for complete description of the professional scope of work. Thanks again for your consideration. Sincerely; Randy Wagner AIA DSGW Architects Attch: AIA Standard Form agreement between Architect and Owner Item No: 7K Meeting Date: 06/26/06 Type of Business: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator Item Title/Subject: Resolution 6863 Approving the Communications Coordinator to Attend the NATOA Conference in Florida Background: This item was reviewed and discussed at the June 5th Council work session, and considered at the June 12th (as Resolution 6841), but was not adopted because it failed to achieve the three affirmative votes required by the City Charter. It is being requested that consideration be given to authorizing Communication Coordinator Kimberly Blackford to attend the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisor’s (NATOA) annual conference August 22-25, 2006 in Lake Buena Vista, Florida. The Resolution has been revised to reflect a limit of $1,000 of City Funding to be used for this purpose. Discussion: The item has been budgeted in the 2006 budget as $1,000 for one national conference attendance. The budgeted funds would pay for transportation, lodging, and meals. The North Suburban Cable Commission has agreed to pay the tuition of $495. The conference will allow this new employee of the City to gain technical knowledge and to build contacts within the cable communications profession. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution 6863, authorizing the attendance of Communications Coordinator Blackford to attend the NATOA conference, provided that, direct City expenditures do not to exceed the $1000 designated in the 2006 budget for said purpose. . RESOLUTION NO. 6863 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMMUNICATIONS COORDINATOR TO ATTEND THE NATOA CONFERENCE IN FLORIDA WHEREAS, the City’s adopted goals for the year include to “Improve communications with the public” and to “Improve the effectiveness in delivery of services”; and WHEREAS, the adopted values of the City include “Professionalism – We believe that continuous improvement is the mark of professionalism and are committed to applying this principle to the services we offer and the development of our employees; and WHEREAS, the City has recently hired a Communications Coordinator who will benefit from continuing education opportunities offered by professional organizations such as the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA), and; WHEREAS, the expenses of a national conference are included in the 2006 budget; and WHEREAS, the NSCC/CTV15 has offered to pay the full tuition for the conference in the amount of $495. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota that the City’s Communications Coordinator, Ms. Kimberly Blackford, is hereby authorized to attend the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisor’s (NATOA) annual conference August 22-25, 2006 in Lake Buena Vista, Florida, provided that, direct City expenditures do not to exceed the $1000 designated in the 2006 budget for said purpose. Adopted this 26th day of June 2006. (ATTEST) ____________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor (SEAL) ____________________________________ Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator Item No: 7N Meeting Date: June 26, 2006 Type of Business: CB Administrator Review: _____ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Chief of Police, Mike Sommer Item Title/Subject: Resolution 6867 Approval to Hire Ben Knitter as Police Officer Date of Report: 6-26-06 Background: The City Council has approved the hiring of a Police Officer for a current vacancy in the Police Department. The Police Civil Service has certified an active eligibility list for the position based on previously conducted testing components, which included written testing, and interviews. The top three candidates on the list are as follows: 1. Ben Knitter (Total score =76) 2. Nicholas Erickson (Total score= 73.6) 3. Eric Kammerer (Total score=68.9)) The #1 candidate, Ben Knitter, has successfully completed all of the required testing procedures, which included a background examination, physical examination, psychological examination and physical agility testing. Staff have personally met and interviewed Mr. Knitter and recommends he be hired to the position. Recommendation: Staff seeks council approval to proceed with appointing Ben Knitter to the Position of Police Officer at the step one rate of pay for the position in accordance with the Law Enforcement Labor Services Contract, which governs the compensation for this position. This hire is to be effective on June 27th, 2006 Respectfully submitted, Mike Sommer Chief of Police RESOLUTION NO. 6867 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPOINTING BEN KNITTER TO THE POSITION OF POLICE OFFICER WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the hiring of a Police Officer for a current vacancy in the Police Department, and the Police Civil Service Commission has approved the procedures for establishing an eligibility register to fill this vacancy, and; WHEREAS, the approved hiring procedures consist of a competitive written examination, resume scoring, oral interviews, background investigations, physical examination, psychological examination, and physical agility testing, and; WHEREAS, the Civil Service Commission has certified the eligibility list for the opening, and Ben Knitter is the top candidate standing on the eligibility register, and his background investigation, physical, psychological, and physical agility testing have all been successfully completed, and; WHEREAS, staff of the Police Department have met with Mr. Knitter, and the Chief of Police recommends he be appointed to the position of Police Officer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council does hereby appoint Ben Knitter to the position of Police Officer effective June 27, 2006 at the step one rate of pay as stipulated in the Law Enforcement Labor Services contract for the position. Adopted this 26thth day of June 2006. ______________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Kurt Ulrich City Clerk/Administrator (SEAL) Item No.: 08A Meeting Date: June 26, 2006 Type of Business: CA City Administrator Review: _____ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Desaree Crane, Assistant to the City Administrator Item Title/Subject: Resolution 6854 Approving 2006 Business Licenses All City of Mounds View business licenses will expire June 30, 2006. Staff is recommending that the Council approve business licenses for the businesses listed in Resolution 6854 contingent upon the City’s receipt of the appropriate fees, applications, proof of insurance and satisfactory reports from the appropriate departments and organizations. Respectfully Submitted, Desaree M. Crane RESOLUTION 6854 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A Resolution Approving Business Licenses for 2006-2007 WHEREAS, all City of Mounds View Business Licenses expire June 30, 2006; and WHEREAS, all City of Mounds View business licenses must be approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, staff recommends approval of the business licenses for the businesses listed in Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council does hereby approve business licenses for the businesses listed in Exhibit A contingent upon the City’s receipt of the appropriate fees, application materials, proof of insurance and satisfactory reports from the Ramsey County Health Department and the Fire Marshal. Adopted this 26th day of June, 2006 Rob Marty, Mayor ATTEST: Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator (seal) EXHIBIT A Local Company License Local Address ABC Liquor Cigarette and Tobacco License 2840 Highway 10 Ace Solid Waste, Inc Garbage and Rubbish Hauler License Anoka, MN The Mermaid Amusement Devices and Centers License 2200 Highway 10 Robert's Sports Bar and Entertainment Amusement Devices and Centers License 2400 County Road H2 Big Top Discount Liquors Cigarette and Tobacco License 2577 Highway 10 Aspen Waste Systems, Inc. Garbage and Rubbish Hauler License Minneapolis, MN BFI Waste Systems of North America Garbage and Rubbish Hauler License Inver Grove Hts, MN Taco Bell #4039 Restaurant License 2219 Highway 10 Long John Silvers Restaurant License 2219 Highway 10 CVS Pharmacy #5999 Cigarette and Tobacco License 2800 County Road 10 Dominos Pizza Restaurant License 2548 Highway 10 Donut Connection Restaurant License 2394 Highway 10 Fedor's Market Cigarette and Tobacco License 5491 Adams St. North Holiday Gasoline License 2732 Highway 10 Holiday Cigarette and Tobacco License 2732 Highway 10 Keith Krupenny & Son Garbage and Rubbish Hauler License West St. Paul, MN KFC #Y067042 Restaurant License 2213 Highway 10 Moe’s Amusement Devices and Centers License 2400 Highway 10 Mounds View Best Steak House Restaurant License 2555 Highway 10 Burger King #4116 Restaurant License 2651 County Road I Mounds View BP, Inc. Cigarette and Tobacco License 2155 Highway 10 Mounds View BP, Inc. Gasoline License 2155 Highway 10 Onyx Waste Services Midwest, Inc. Garbage and Rubbish Hauler License 1375 7th Avenue McDonald's Restaurant License 2201 Highway 10 Pink Flower Vietnamese Restaurant Restaurant License 2563 Highway 10 R.J. Riches Restaurant Restaurant License 2145 Highway Avenue Randy's Sanitaton Garbage and Rubbish Hauler License Delano, MN Ray Anderson & Sons Co. Inc. Garbage and Rubbish Hauler License St. Paul, MN Robert's Sports Bar and Entertainment Cigarette and Tobacco License 2400 County Road H2 Robert's Sports Bar and Entertainment Restaurant License 2400 County Road H2 Saturn of St.Paul Automobile Sales License 2375 Highway 10 Seehafer, Wayne Residential Kennel License 8009 Red Oak Drive Sham-O-Jets Kennels Commercial Dog Kennel 7700 Long Lake Road Stolz, Elizabeth (Dr.) Residential Kennel License 8320 Pleasant View Dr. Local Company License Local Address Snyder's Drug #5044 Cigarette and Tobacco License 2553 Highway 10 SuperAmerica #4264 Cigarette and Tobacco License 2640 County Road I SuperAmerica #4264 Gasoline License 2640 County Road I SuperAmerica #4264 3.2 Malt Liquor License (Off-Sale) 2640 County Road I Subway Restaurant License 2546 Highway 10 The Mermaid Restaurant License 2200 Highway 10 The Mermaid Bowling License 2200 Highway 10 The Mermaid Cigarette and Tobacco License 2200 Highway 10 The Station Gasoline License 2280 West County Road I The Station Cigarette and Tobacco License 2280 West County Road I Wynnsong 15 Amusement Devices and Centers License 2430 Highway 10 Twin City Refuse Garbage and Rubbish Hauler License St. Paul, MN VASKO Solid Waste Garbage and Rubbish Hauler License 309 Como Avenue Veit Corporation Garbage and Rubbish Hauler License Rogers, MN View Market Cigarette and Tobacco License 2408 County Rd I Vino & Stogies Cigarette and Tobacco License 2345 County Road H2 Walgreens #06447 Cigarette and Tobacco License 2387 Highway 10 Walter's Recyling and Refuse Garbage and Rubbish Hauler License Circle Pines, MN Waste Management of Minnesota Garbage and Rubbish Hauler License Blaine, MN Item No: 08B Meeting Date June 26, 2006 Type of Business: CA City Administrator Review: ______ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Barb Benesch, Administrative Assistant Item Title/Subject: CONTRACTOR LICENSES FOR APPROVAL Please consider the following contractor licenses for approval. All contractor licenses will expire on December 31, 2006. All applicants have submitted appropriate fees and proof of insurance. Those companies that are “new” include applicants that have never been licensed with the City or they may have been licensed with the City in the past, but were not licensed in 2005. Those companies renewing their license were licensed, at a minimum, in the year 2005. The type of license they are applying for follows the company name. Ettel & Franz Roofing Company General (Commercial) New More’s Burner Service, Inc. HVAC Renewal Staff Recommendation: Approve license applications as requested. Respectfully submitted, Barb Benesch Item No: 8E Meeting Date: June 26, 2006 Type of Business: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator Item Title/Subject: Resolution 6855 Approving Contract for Legal Services with Kennedy & Graven Introduction: At the work session on May 1, 2006, the Council discussed the pending expiration of the legal contract with Kennedy and Graven that is due to expire on July 14, 2006. The consensus of the Council was to authorize an extension of the Attorney’s contract. A draft contract was reviewed at the work session on June 5th, and one change was made to designate only Mr. Riggs and Mr. Vose as City Attorneys (Mr. Alsop’s name was removed). Previous modifications to the contract in 2003 included language regarding training and regular communications, response time, and a requirement that the City Attorney be present only at one meeting per month. At that time, the reduction in the monthly retainer was $500 to have the attorney attend only one of the Council’s regular meetings. These modifications have been in place for the previous three years (i.e., two-year contract, plus one year extension) and have generally worked well and to the City’s expectations, and remain in the proposed contract. The Attorney has only been attending one meeting per month unless, due to issues that are on the agenda, the Council or City Administrator, requests his attendance. Discussion: The attached retainer agreement is essentially the same as the one the City currently has in place. All retainer rates and most fees for services to the City remain the same. Only the external billing rates (i.e., reimbursable rates charged to a third party such as a developer) and TIF project rates as in Section 2.04b. have been increased from $170 to $180 per hour. Additionally, a charge for color copies was added and the mileage rate was adjusted. No other modifications are proposed. The term of the contract is proposed for three years. The previous contract was for two years with a one-year extension. Staff supports a longer term due to the fact that it locks in current rates and minimizes administration. Importantly, it is also provided that the Agreement may be terminated by the City at any time or by the City Attorney upon 30 days written notice, if the City determines it desires to change legal services for whatever reason. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution 6855 Approving Contract for Legal Services with Kennedy & Graven. RESOLUTION 6855 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KENNEDY & GRAVEN TO PROVIDE CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES TO THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW WHEREAS, on July 28, 2003, after soliciting requests for proposals for legal services, the City Council of the City of Mounds View adopted Resolution 6059 which authorized staff to approve the retainer agreement from Kennedy & Graven (Exhibit A) to provide civil legal services for a two year period beginning July 14, 2003; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently determined with passage of Resolution 6573 that it would be in the City’s best interest to extend the term of that contract by one year until July 14, 2006; and WHEREAS, the City Council has given due consideration of the performance of the firm in regard to its current contract with the City, and has determined that a continuation of the contract would be beneficial to the City. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, THAT the Mounds View City Council does hereby approve an agreement with the law firm of Kennedy & Graven (Exhibit A) to provide civil legal services for a three-year period beginning June 26, 2006. Adopted this 26th day of June, 2006. ________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator (seal) EXHIBIT A AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES This Agreement, entered into between the CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, a Minnesota municipal corporation (City) and the law firm of KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED (City Attorney) as of this 26th day of June, 2006, provides as follows: SECTION 1. Backqround: Findings. 1.01. Authority. The appointment and removal of the City Attorney are made by the City Council. 1.02. Council Determination. At a duly called regular meeting of the City Council held on June 26, 2006, the City Council determined that the firm of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered be engaged as City Attorney, with Scott J. Riggs and Robert J. V. Vose of that firm serving as primary legal counsel for the City and instructed the City Clerk-Administrator to prepare an agreement between the firm and the City setting forth the terms and conditions of the engagement. SECTION 2. Terms and Conditions. 2.01. Consideration. In consideration of the mutual promises and conditions contained in this Agreement the City and the City Attorney agree to the terms and conditions set forth herein. 2.02. City Attorney Appointment. The City appoints the firm of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered as City Attorney, with Scott J. Riggs and Robert J. V. Vose acting as primary legal counsel for the City. 2.03. Usual and Customary Legal Services. The City Attorney agrees to perform all usual and customary legal services for the City in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, including, but not limited to the following: a. Attendance by the primary legal counsel from the firm, as requested, at one Council meeting per month; b. Meetings with staff and public groups as requested by the Council or the City Clerk- Administrator and public hearings before the Council; c. Review and preparation of contracts, performance bonds, insurance and other routine legal documents; d. Ordinance code amendments and preparation of resolutions; e. Formal and informal legal advice to Council, staff and committees; f. Responses to inquiries from the public on matters not directly related to criminal prosecution activities; g. Regular training for staff including, but not limited to, human resource issues, sexual harassment, city government procedures, employee discipline procedures, workers compensation, OSHA issues; h. Occasional attendance at staff meetings as directed by the City Clerk- Administrator; i. Legal updates, alerts and opinions to staff on issues affecting the City; j. Proactive advice as to City Code and personnel policies; k. All other routine legal services except those pertaining to: i. land acquisitions and sales; ii. litigation, administrative proceedings, eminent domain and special assessment appeals; iii.. review of subdivision and land development contracts; iv. approval of improvement bonds/proceedings and other authorized bond issues; v. telecommunication matters; vi. employment matters and labor negotiations; vii. Economic Development Authority matters involving the establishment of tax increment financing districts and development contracts; viii. Separate Commissions of the City including, but not limited to Economic Development Authority, Police Civil Service Commission, and Charter Commission. As an aid to the interpretation of the services to be covered by the retainer agreement, the following definitions would apply: "Administrative proceedings" means services directly related and preparatory to representing the City or its agencies before a federal, state or regional administrative agency. "Eminent domain" means services performed directly related and preparatory to the commencement of an action of eminent domain by or against the City or its agencies. "Litigation" means services performed by the city attorney: (a) in response to a claim filed against the City or an action commenced against the City, its agencies, or their officers, agents or employees; (b) in response to administrative proceedings; and (c) appearances on behalf of the City or its agencies before state or federal courts, boards or commissions. "Routine" means matters usual and customarily undertaken by a city attorney in the discharge of office. 2.04. Compensation for Legal Services. For legal services, except as provided in Section 2.08, the City agrees to compensate the City Attorney at the following hourly rates for services indicated below: a . For all attorneys in general municipal matters as set forth in Section 2.03 (except Section 2.03(k)) pursuant to a monthly retainer in the amount of $2,500.00. b. For all attorneys for matters set forth in Section 2.03(k) as follows: i. For all attorneys in real estate matters, telecommunication matters, employment and labor negotiation matters $140/hr. ii. For all attorneys in litigation and administrative proceedings $150/hr. iii. For all attorneys in matters in which costs are passed through to developer and tax increment matters $180/hr. iv. For all law clerks for work not covered by the retainer set forth in Section 2.04(a) $75/hr. v. For all paralegals for work not covered by the retainer set forth in Section 2.04(a) $95/hr. vi. Bond counsel services as set forth in Section 2.08. vii. For all attorneys requested to attend a regular council meeting in excess of one per month, established under Section 2.03(a). $120/hr. - no travel time allowed. 2.05. Compensation for Expenses. The City will compensate the City Attorney for the following actual and necessary expenses incurred by the City Attorney on behalf of the City: The firm will bill its out-of-pocket costs for such things as postage, long distance telephone calls, photocopying, filing fees and witness fees, and similar items. Mileage compensation will not be charged for attendance at regular City Council Meetings. Photocopying: $.20 per page Color copies $1.00 per page Facsimiles $.50 per page Mileage: $.445 per mile Westlaw or Lexis fees: Actual cost charged Other charges such as: Actual cost charged Messenger service Express mail Long distance telephone calls Filing fees Parking fees Our monthly billing statements provide detail for all fees and costs. 2.06. Billing Statements. Billings by the City Attorney to the City for services will be on a monthly basis, except as may otherwise be agreed upon by the parties. The billing statement shall be of sufficient detail to adequately inform the City concerning the tasks performed, the attorney or staff performing them, the time spent on each task and the nature and extent of costs and disbursements. The statement shall also contain a summary that shows the total time spent for each category and the total fees, charges and disbursements for each category. 2.07. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be for three years. The hourly rates specified in this Agreement will remain in effect for the term of this Agreement. 2.08. Bond Counsel Services. The City Attorney will act as approving bond counsel for the City if so requested by the City. These services are not part of this Agreement, but may be made such by mutual agreement of the parties. In the event such services are desired by the City, fees for these services will be those usual and customarily charged by the firm of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered. 2.09. Primary Legal Counsel. It is the intention of the parties and it is hereby agreed by the City Attorney, that the term "primary legal counsel" as used herein means and refers to Scott J. Riggs and Robert J. V. Vose who will, except in the case of extraordinary circumstances involving disability, unavoidable conflict or other good and substantial reasons, perform, supervise and be responsible to the City for the legal services to be provided. 2.10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, any attached exhibits and any addenda or amendments signed by the parties shall constitute the entire agreement between the City and the City Attorney, and supersedes any other written or oral agreements between the City and the City Attorney. This Agreement can only be modified in writing signed by the City and the City Attorney. 2.11. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the City at any time or by the City Attorney upon 30 days written notice. 2.12. Conflict of Interest. The City Attorney shall use best efforts to meet all professional obligations to avoid conflicts of interest and appearances of impropriety in representation of the City. In the event of a conflict, the City Attorney, with the consent of the City, shall arrange for suitable alternative legal representation. It is the intent of the City Attorney to refrain from handling legal matters for any other person or entity that may pose a conflict of interest. 2.13. Agreement Not Assignable. Except as provided in Paragraph 2.12 of this Agreement relating to conflicts of interest, the rights and obligations created by this Agreement may not be assigned by either party. 2.14. Agreement Not Exclusive. The City retains the right to hire other legal representation for specific legal matters. 2.15. Independent Contractor Status. All services provided by the City Attorney pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by the City Attorney as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City for any purpose, including but not limited to: income tax withholding, workers' compensation, unemployment compensation, FICA taxes, liability for torts and eligibility for employee benefits. 2.16. Work Products. All records, information, materials and other work products prepared and developed in connection with the provision of services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of the City. 2.17. Insurance. The City Attorney shall maintain professional liability (malpractice) insurance in the minimum amount of $1,000,000. 2.18. Data Practices Act Compliance. Data provided to the City Attorney under this Agreement shall be administered in accordance with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13. 2.19. Choices of Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claims arising out of this Agreement shall be heard in the state or federal courts of Minnesota, and all parties to this Agreement waive any objection to the jurisdiction of these courts, whether based on convenience or otherwise. 2.20. Agreement Extensions. Subject to the rights of termination described in Section 2.11, the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be automatically extended from year-to- year or extended with such modifications or adjustments as the City and City Attorney may from time-to- time mutually agree. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be duly executed by their proper officers and representatives as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA By: ____________________________ Rob Marty Its: Mayor By: ____________________________ Kurt Ulrich Its: City Clerk-Administrator KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED By: ____________________________ Scott J. Riggs City Attorney Item No: 08F Meeting Date: June 26, 2006 Type of Business: CA Administrator Review: _____ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Desaree M. Crane, Administrative Assistant Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution 6856, a Resolution Authorizing Distribution of Service Appreciation Certificates to Employees having Achieved a Five-Year Employment Milestone as of 2006. Introduction: As discussed at the June 5, 2006, Work Session, Staff has scheduled an Employee Appreciation Lunch for Wednesday, June 28, 2005, located at the Mounds View Banquet Center, from 11am to 100pm. As stated in Resolution 5617, the City will provide eligible employees gift certificates for a Five-Year Employment Milestone. Discussion: Resolution 5617 indicates that the City will provide to employees “gift certificates in the amount of $5 per year of service at five-year increments.” Currently there are 8 city employees that fall under these criteria. Both the Employee Lunch and Gift Certificates are currently budgeted for 2006 (Budget # 100-4100-1600). The employees below qualify under the criteria set in Resolution 5617: Employee Name Department Years of Service as of 2006 Gift Certificate Amount Aaron Backman Community Development 5 years $25.00 Keith Czarnecki Police Department 10 years $50.00 Jim Ericson Community Development 10 years $50.00 Tracy Juell Public Works Department 15 years $75.00 Kasey Keckeisen Police Department 5 years $25.00 Kirk Leitch Police Department 5 years $25.00 Steven Menard Police Department 10 years $50.00 Darrell Meyer Police Department 10 years $50.00 This year Staff will be catering the event with Marino’s Deli in Minneapolis. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of purchasing these gift certificates to recognize the achievements of these eight (8) city employees. These eight employees will be asked where they want their gift certificates purchased, and Staff will pick them up. As it was done last year, all gift certificates must be chosen in the Twin Cities area. Respectfully submitted, Desaree M. Crane RESOLUTION NO 6856 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION APPROVING DISTRIBUTION OF SERVICE APPRECIATION CERTIFICATES TO EMPLOYEES HAVING REACHED FIVE-YEAR EMPLOYMENT MILESTONES WHEREAS, Resolution 5617 was adopted by the City Council on October 8, 2001; and, WHEREAS, one of the clauses in Resolution 5617 indicates that the City will provide to employees certificates in the amount of $5 per year of service at five-year increments; and, WHEREAS, the following individuals have achieved an employment milestone with the City of Mounds View since the adoption of Resolution 5617; and, WHEREAS, together the eight (8) identified employees have a cumulative 70 years of experience with the City of Mounds View. Employee Name Department Years of Service as of 2006 Gift Certificate Amount Aaron Backman Community Development 5 years $25.00 Keith Czarnecki Police Department 10 years $50.00 Jim Ericson Community Development 10 years $50.00 Tracy Juell Public Works Department 15 years $75.00 Kasey Keckeisen Police Department 5 years $25.00 Kirk Leitch Police Department 5 years $25.00 Steven Menard Police Department 10 years $50.00 Darrell Meyer Police Department 10 years $50.00 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Mounds View City Council does hereby appreciate and recognize the eight employees listed above for their years of dedicated service and, pursuant to Resolution 5617, does hereby authorize the distribution of Service Appreciation Certificates to each herein identified employee in amounts equal to five times their years of service. Adopted this 26th day of June, 2006 ________________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator (seal) Item No: 08G Meeting Date: June 26, 2006 Type of Business: CA City Administrator Review: ______ City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Desaree Crane, Assistant to the City Administrator Item Title/Subject: Resolution 6861, Approving a Charitable Gambling One-Day Permit for the Mounds View Community Theatre for the August 20, 2006 Mounds View Festival in the Park The Mounds View Community Theatre, a non-profit charitable organization, would like to hold a Bingo Game on August 20, 2006, at the Mounds View City Hall Park, for the Mounds View Festival in the Park celebration. The Mounds View Community Theatre is located in Mounds View, and they have more than 30 active members. This meets the requirements of the Mounds View City Code. The Gambling Control Board requires that local unit of government (city or county), pass a resolution specifically approving or denying the Premises Permit Application. This resolution (approving or denying the application) must be voted on and the resolution forwarded to the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the One-Day Charitable Gambling Permit for the Mounds View Community Theatre at the location and date stated above. Respectfully Submitted, Desaree M. Crane RESOLUTION NO. 6861 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING A PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THE MOUNDS VIEW COMMUNITY THEATRE, A CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION TO CONDUCT CHARITABLE GAMBLING FOR THE MOUNDS VIEW FESTIVAL IN THE PARK CELEBRATION ON AUGUST 20, 2006 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Community Theatre has requested that the City Council allow them to conduct charitable gambling (BINGO) at the Mounds View City Park for the Mounds View Festival in the Park celebration; and WHEREAS, the Gambling Control Board requires that the local unit of government (city or county) pass a resolution specifically approving or denying requests to conduct charitable gambling; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Community Theatre, is in compliance with all requirements of the Mounds View Municipal Code with regard to charitable gambling regulations; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Community Theatre has requested a one- day charitable gambling permit; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Community Theatre will be conducting BINGO for the Mounds View Festival in the Park celebration on August 20, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council does hereby authorize Mounds View Community Theatre, to conduct charitable gambling at the Mounds View City Park on August 20, 2006, located at 2401 Highway 10 in Mounds View. Adopted this 26th day of June, 2006. _______________________________ Rob Marty, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator (seal) PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL 1 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2 RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 3 4 Regular Meeting 5 June 12, 2006 6 Mounds View City Hall 7 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 8 7:00 P.M. 9 10 11 1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER 12 13 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 14 15 3. ROLL CALL: Acting Mayor Stigney, Councilmember Gunn, and Councilmember 16 Flaherty 17 18 NOT PRESENT: Mayor Marty and Councilmember Thomas 19 20 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 21 22 A. Monday, May 22, 2006 City Council Agenda 23 24 MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To Approve the Monday, June 12, 2006 agenda as 25 presented. 26 27 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 28 29 5. PUBLIC INPUT 30 31 William Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, spoke regarding the proposed Community Center and 32 additional recreational equipment. Mr. Werner said he has not heard anything about its progress 33 even though it seems to be progressing. He asked Acting Mayor Stigney to explain the scope of 34 the recreational equipment and the City is in the process of completing the Community Center. 35 36 Acting Mayor Stigney replied that the City has received bids. 37 38 City Administrator Ulrich stated that at the last Planning Commission meeting, the architects 39 presented plans and it was the consensus of the Commissioners to get quotes before the next step, 40 which is to prepare specifications. Administrator Ulrich explained the specifications would 41 consider the cost and budget calculations of the project, specifically based on the criteria of 42 potential revenue for the project considering at different scenarios. He said that Staff is working 43 on scenarios and expects the issue will be before the Council at the June 26 meeting. 44 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 2 Mr. Werner asked if the City has a projected dollar amount. Administrator Ulrich replied that the 1 very preliminary estimates are about $600,000 with about 6% additional, or $36,000, for 2 architectural fees. 3 4 Mr. Werner stated his opinion that a Community Center with a cost $6.3 million is significant. 5 Mr. Werner said his concern is if there is a point at which the project is not feasible. He asked if 6 there would be a fee for use said with such a significant sum of money being allocated to the 7 project, he believes there should be a fee associate with its use. He said the City will be 8 competing with a health club up near Northtown. He said he is amazed at the amount of money 9 being spent on a community center and that it must be sensible. He asked when the feasibility of 10 such a center will be determined. 11 12 Acting Mayor Stigney stated that what has been reported so far is the capital cost, not operational 13 costs. He said there is already a fitness center in the area, but the consensus of the Council 14 agreed that plans should go forward. Acting Mayor Stigney said he personally agrees with 15 Werner that he does not believe it is practical. He said it may wishful thinking that the 16 community center will make money and if it does not, it will cost taxpayers. 17 18 Mr. Werner said it is fine if we do not make money on the Community Center, but the costs must 19 be feasible. Acting Mayor Stigney replied that he believes the City will not make money off of 20 the Community Center and questions if the Center is practical and viable. Mr. Werner stated he 21 will come back every meeting to keep attention to the project. 22 23 Councilmember Flaherty explained the current Community Center is 100% subsidized and that 24 private funding will not work. He said that the City must do something with the empty building 25 and it is his opinion it is foolish not to make it a place for the Citizens of Mounds View. He said 26 the City is looking at other alternatives and there is a committee formed to consider other 27 options. He said they solicited citizens’ input several times and that they are looking at the 28 Community Center will be a bonus for residents of Mounds View. He said nothing is final but it 29 should be provide to citizens in the same way parks do. 30 31 Mr. Werner said he still believes the cost is way out of line. 32 33 Mr. Werner then stated he came to the new City Hall building for the meeting and believed the 34 new Chambers look terrible. He asked if there was any possibility of taking some of the lights but 35 then withdrew the comment because he stated it would cost too much money. 36 37 Acting Mayor Stigney said the Council should draw up a RFP for the Community Center plans. 38 39 6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUISNESS 40 41 A. Resolution 6848, Resolution of Appreciation for Israel Diaz, Volunteer Fire 42 Inspector for the SBM Fire Department. 43 44 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 3 Fire Marshal Kathi Osmonson introduced Volunteer Fire Inspector Israel Diaz. She said she 1 recently reviewed City records and noticed that Mr. Diaz has donated over 300 hours to the City 2 doing volunteer work. She said Israel is a great person to have on board and publicly thanked Mr. 3 Diaz. 4 5 Mr. Diaz thanked the Council, City, and Fire Marshal Osmonson. 6 7 City Administrator Ulrich read the resolution in full. 8 9 Acting Mayor Stigney stated there will be a framed certificate presented to Mr. Diaz as soon as it 10 was signed. 11 12 MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN to adopt Resolution 6848, Resolution of 13 Appreciation for Israel Diaz, Volunteer Fire Inspector for the SBM Fire Department. 14 15 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 16 17 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS 18 19 A. Resolution 6836, a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for an 20 Oversize Garage at 8382 Knollwood Drive. 21 22 Planning Associate Heller stated that before the Council is a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for 23 an oversize garage at 8382 Knollwood Drive. She stated that the residents, Robert and Lisa 24 Horbul, would like to put a 24’ x 30’ addition to the rear of their garage. She stated there is a 25 drawing in the packet. She stated they need a CUP because it would bring the total square feet 26 up to 1,604, which is beyond the current limit of 952 square feet. She said it would be for 27 storage of an RV and other things. She stated the garage would not be used as a business. 28 29 Associate Heller explained that with a CUP before them, the Council needs to determine if there 30 will be any adverse affects by approval. She stated the Council needs to look at the 31 Comprehensive Plan to see if the oversize garage would benefit the neighborhood. 32 33 Associate Heller elaborated that the property is on Knollwood Drive, which is a residential area. 34 She said that the addition will not be seen from the front will blend in with the original roofline. 35 She said it would somewhat block the view looking across the back yard. She said that the 36 addition will provide the property with additional inside storage and raise the value of the 37 property. 38 39 Associate Horbul said Knollwood Drive is a strictly residential area. She said the Horbuls have 40 demonstrated a need for the addition to keep vehicles in the garage rather than in the driveway 41 and behind the garage. She stated that a resident who lived several houses away did have a 42 concern, and that the applicants were in attendance to answer any questions the Council may 43 have. 44 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 4 Acting Mayor Stigney opened the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. 1 2 Acting Mayor Stigney closed the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. 3 4 Councilmember Gunn asked if the Horbuls will keep the shed in the back yard. Associate Heller 5 replied that they did plan to keep the shed, and that the total square footage for accessory 6 buildings will be under the allowed 1,800 square feet. 7 8 Councilmember Flaherty asked if the addition will be sided the same color as the house, and 9 Associate Heller replied that yes it will. Councilmember Flaherty pointed out that there is a 10 foundation behind the garage. Associate Heller stated it is for the RV and will be replaced by the 11 garage. 12 13 Councilmember Flaherty asked if the oversize garage would be used to get rid of the clutter and 14 Associate Heller replied that there was nothing specific in the plan. 15 16 MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6836, a 17 Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversize Garage at 8382 Knollwood 18 Drive. 19 20 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion Carried 21 22 B. Resolution 6837, a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for an 23 Oversize Garage at 5308 St. Stephen Street. 24 25 Associated Heller stated Mark McKay has requested a CUP for a larger garage at 5308 St. 26 Stephen Street. She stated Mr. McKay will demolish his current garage and build one that will 27 be 2 cars deep. Associate Heller said it will be the same width, but twice as deep because his lot 28 will not allow a wider garage. 29 30 Associate Heller explained the oversize garage is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan 31 because a new garage will add to the neighborhood. She said the area is residential with a few 32 businesses nearby. She said the addition will be in the rear of the garage and will look the same 33 from the street. 34 35 Associate Heller said Mr. McKay talked with his neighbors and they have no problems with the 36 addition. She said his backyard is a little shallower than that of the Horbuls, but that the addition 37 will not interfere with the house behind the property. 38 39 Associate Heller stated that a brand new garage will not cause any depreciation for the home or 40 neighborhood and will add value. She explained that Mr. McKay would like to park more than 41 two vehicles inside rather than on the street, which is the demonstrated need. 42 43 She said there was no feedback during the May 17 Planning Commission meeting and all zoning 44 and point issues are satisfied within the request. She stated that Mr. McKay was in attendance to 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 5 answer any questions 1 2 Acting Mayor Stigney opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. 3 4 Acting Mayor Stigney closed the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. 5 6 Councilmember Flaherty asked if the applicants will demolish the current garage and add a new 7 one, and Associate Heller responded yes. He asked if the driveway would be repaired at the 8 same time. Mr. McKay said the driveway is not in that bad a shape and he had not planned to 9 repair it. 10 11 Mr. McKay said the only reason he is asking to tear down the current garage is because it was 12 built on a floating slab. Mr. McKay stated he is going to ask that the contractors put in cross-13 footings across the garage. Mr. McKay stated the floating slab is the reason he is asking to tear 14 down the garage rather than building an addition on the back. 15 16 MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6837, a 17 Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversize Garage at 5308 St. Stephen 18 Street. 19 20 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 21 22 C. Resolution 6830, an Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for ABC 23 Liquor located at 2840 Highway 10. 24 25 Assistant to the City Administrator Desaree Crane stated that the City of Mounds View issued an 26 intoxicating liquor license for ABC Liquor in June of 2005, and their renewal is before the 27 Council for consideration. She explained that ABC Liquor’s Intoxicating Liquor License will 28 expire June 30, 2006. She said the notice of this public hearing was sent out to residences within 29 350 feet radius, and the Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Mounds View/New 30 Brighton Bulletin. 31 32 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that ABC Liquor has submitted their City liquor 33 license application materials and the applicable fees. 34 35 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane explained that there was one police incident which is 36 attached along with a memorandum from Bob Vose, an attorney from Kennedy and Graven. She 37 said there is an area of concern with this police report in regard to selling alcohol to minors. She 38 stated this is the establishment’s first violation. 39 40 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane added that the Finance Department has issued a 41 satisfactory Utility Billing Inquiry for ABC Liquor and that the City’s Fire Marshal has issued a 42 satisfactory Fire Inspection Report. 43 44 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane said that Staff recommends the City Council open the 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 6 Public Hearing for public input. She said that due to the concerns stated in the police report, staff 1 would like to discuss how to proceed with this business renewal. She said that since this is a first 2 violation with the owner, and the owner is not currently convicted, the City could proceed with 3 the renewal and monitor the proceedings of the case. 4 5 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane explained that a resolution approving this license was 6 provided if the Council wishes to approve the liquor license. She said if the City Council wishes 7 to investigate this matter further, then the City Council could also open the Public Hearing for 8 public comment and postpone the renewal until the next City Council Meeting. She explained 9 that if this renewal is approved, the time period of this license will be July 1, 2006 to June 30, 10 2007 11 12 Acting Mayor Stigney opened the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. 13 14 Owner of ABC Liquor, Mr. Xiong, said that during November of last year, he had to see the 15 doctor and was not in the store. He said there were three men in the store and that one woman 16 was in a car behind the building. He said one of the men went around to the back, stole the 17 liquor, and went outside to the woman. Mr. Xiong said the clerk did not ask for the ID of the 18 man who was at the counter. Mr. Xiong stated that the clerk realized the man who went out the 19 back had shoplifted and called police and that the man who went out the back said that he did not 20 have ID. He said that the police officer took the man without the ID who was at the counter 21 outside the store. 22 23 Mr. Xiong said that they have the permit until February 2007. He said he has one other store, 24 and asked if the violation is against him or the clerk who sold the liquor to the minor. Assistant 25 to the City Administrator Crain replied that the violation is against the owner, not the clerk. Mr. 26 Xiong said that from now on, he hopes there are no more problems. 27 28 Acting Mayor Stigney closed the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. 29 30 Councilmember Flaherty asked to table the vote until the City Attorney can answer some 31 questions. 32 33 MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY, To postpone consideration of Resolution 6830, an 34 Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for ABC Liquor located at 2840 Highway 10, until 35 the June 26, 2006 meeting. 36 37 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 38 39 D. Resolution 6831, an Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for Big 40 To Liquor located at 2577 Highway 10. 41 42 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane reported that the City of Mounds View issued an 43 intoxicating liquor license for Big Top Liquor in June of 2005, and their renewal is before the 44 Council for consideration. She explained that Big Top Liquor’s Intoxicating Liquor License will 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 7 expire on June 30, 2006 and that the notice of this public hearing was sent out to residences 1 within a 350 feet radius, and the Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Mounds 2 View/New Brighton Bulletin. 3 4 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that Big Top Liquor has submitted their City 5 liquor license application materials and the applicable fees. She stated that the Mounds View 6 Police Department has issue a satisfactory report for Big Top Liquor. She added that the Finance 7 Department has issued a satisfactory Utility Billing Inquiry Report. She explained that the City’s 8 Fire Marshal will be inspecting the establishment within the week and that this Off-Sale 9 Intoxicating Liquor License renewal will be pending a satisfactory fire inspection. 10 11 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that Staff recommends to open the Public 12 Hearing for public comment and that the City Council approve Big Top Liquor’s application for 13 an Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License pending a satisfactory inspection from the Mounds View 14 Fire Marshal. She stated the time period for this license will be July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. 15 16 Acting Mayor Stigney opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. 17 18 Acting Mayor Stigney closed the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. 19 20 MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6831, 21 an Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for Big To Liquor located at 2577 Highway 10. 22 23 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 24 25 E. Resolution 6832, an Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for Vino 26 & Stogies located at 2345 County Road H2. 27 28 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that the City of Mounds View issued an 29 intoxicating liquor license for Vino & Stogies in June of 2005, and their renewal is before the 30 Council for consideration. She explained that Vino & Stogies Intoxicating Liquor License will 31 expire on June 30, 2006, and that the notice of this public hearing was sent out to residences 32 within 350 feet radius, and the Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Mounds View/New 33 Brighton Bulletin. 34 35 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that Vino & Stogies has submitted their City 36 liquor license application materials and the applicable fees. She added that Vino & Stogies has 37 not submitted their Certificate of Liability Insurance and their license will not be issued until 38 Staff receives this certificate. 39 40 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that the Mounds View Police Department has 41 issue a satisfactory Police Inquiry and Investigations report for Vino & Stogies, and the Finance 42 Department has issue a satisfactory Utility Billing Report for Vino & Stogies. She added that the 43 City’s Fire Marshal has inspected the establishment and issued a satisfactory report regarding the 44 establishment pending correction of minor Fire Code issues. 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 8 1 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that Staff recommends opening the Public 2 Hearing for Public Comment and further recommends the Council approve Vino & Stogies’ 3 application for an Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License pending receipt of their Certificate of 4 Liability Insurance. She stated that the time period for this license will be July 1, 2006 to June 5 30, 2007. 6 7 Acting Mayor Stigney opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. 8 9 Acting Mayor Stigney closed the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. 10 11 MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6832, 12 an Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for Vino & Stogies located at 2345 County 13 Road H2. 14 15 Councilmember Flaherty asked if the minor fire code issues have been addressed. Assistant to the 16 City Administrator Crane replied that the changes are pending and Vino & Stogies is working on 17 the situation. 18 19 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 20 21 F. Resolution 6833, an On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for 22 Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment located at 2400 County Road H2. 23 24 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that the City of Mounds View issued an 25 intoxicating liquor license to Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment in June of 2005, and their 26 renewal is before the Council for consideration. She added that Robert’s Sports Bar and 27 Entertainment’s Intoxicating Liquor License will expire in June 30, 2006. 28 29 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment has 30 submitted their City liquor license application materials and the applicable fees. She added that 31 Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment owes Staff a Certificate of Liability Insurance and this 32 liquor license will not be issued until an original Certificate of Liability Insurance is received. 33 She stated a notice of this public hearing was sent out to residences within a 350 feet radius, and 34 the Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Mounds View/New Brighton Bulletin. 35 36 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that the Mounds View Police Department has 37 issued a satisfactory Police Inquiry and Investigations report, and the Finance Department has 38 issued a satisfactory Utility Billing Inquiry report for the establishment. 39 40 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that Staff recommends the City Council open the 41 Public Hearing for public comment and that Staff recommends approving Robert’s Sports Bar 42 and Entertainment’s application for an On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License pending a 43 satisfactory inspection from the Mounds View Fire Marshal and receipt of the Certificate of 44 Liability Insurance. She stated the time period for this license will be July 1, 2006 to June 30, 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 9 2007. 1 2 Acting Mayor Stigney opened the public hearing at 7:41 p.m. 3 4 Cindy Hilger stated she lives on the west side of Robert’s, across the street. She explained that 5 the residents in her area have had issues about the noise every year. She said she has lived there 6 for 6 years, and the noise gets progressively worse and worse. She explained the music is loud 7 and the residents can feel their windows vibrate. She said the noise is hard to deal with Thursday 8 through Sunday. 9 10 Ms. Hilger added that motorcycles rev their engines at 2:30 a.m., drive up and down the 11 residential street, and return to the parking lot. She stated there must be a noise ordinance that 12 prohibits such disruption. She explained there were trees put in several years ago in an effort to 13 block the noise, but they do not help. She stated that residents are hoping something is done. 14 She said that it is difficult to sleep. 15 16 Acting Mayor Stigney asked who could address this issue and Administrator Ulrich asked Police 17 Chief Sommer to speak. 18 19 Chief Sommer said the City must respond to these things and recommend that residents call 911 20 as such situations are happening. He said as far as the ongoing problem of the noise, he is not 21 sure what can be addressed at the meeting. He said at least the police department is aware of the 22 noise problem now and suggested the residents of the area start documenting the noise problems 23 with official police reports. Chief Sommer added the Council could take action at a later date. 24 25 Ms. Hilger said that police have been called on a number of occasions and said got the run-26 around, including from the police department in Maplewood. She said they finally quit calling 27 because nobody from Mounds View would respond. She said their calls were sent to other police 28 departments, which has happened several times when she has dialed 911. Chief Sommer 29 responded that it is an issue with the dispatching service and asked that residents specify Mounds 30 View when calling 911. 31 32 Wayne Gilberg, 5287 Edgewood Drive, said he lives across the street and also addressed the 33 problem of the noise. He asked if a barrier could be built around the building or if the building 34 could be soundproofed. 35 36 Acting Mayor Stigney stated there is a noise ordinance and asked Community Development 37 Director Ericson to look into the ordinance and situation of Robert’s. Director Ericson said in 38 years past there have been noise complaints, but there has not been many in the last few years. 39 He said it is unfortunate that there is still a noise issue and he will follow up with the problem. 40 41 Sarah Mears, 5292 Edgewood Drive, stated she lives directly behind Robert’s Sports Bar and 42 Entertainment and has called the police on 3 occasions, twice for noise and once for an 43 intoxicated man crawling around in their front yard. She explained there have been beer bottles 44 thrown multiple times into her yard and that her children, ages seven and three, have found them. 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 10 She said they have called the police two times in the last 6 months for noise. 1 2 Ms. Mears stated that Robert’s leaves their doors open and every word can be heard from inside 3 the bar. She said it is difficult to go to bed, and to try to put the kids to bed when there is loud 4 music, especially during the school year. She explained that garbage is thrown over and that 5 something once hit their trees when her husband was in their back yard. She said someone had 6 thrown a plastic rack into their yard from the bar. She said she has issues with the garbage, the 7 noise, and the drunk people in her yard. 8 9 Acting Mayor Stigney closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. 10 11 Administrator Ulrich suggested that, with the number of complaints, the Council should ask the 12 owners of Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment to address citizens’ complaints during the 13 Council meeting on June 26. 14 15 Acting Mayor Stigney said that June 26 should provide them sufficient notification in time for 16 the insurance to be renewed. He thanked the residents for speaking out because the Council did 17 not know about these issues. 18 19 Councilmember Flaherty stated that the residents should not have to tolerate such problems at 20 any time. He said police need to get involved if there are drunk people in citizens’ front yards. 21 He asked the Chief to look into a response since the people here have not received help. He 22 further said he believes it is a good idea to have Robert’s owner in on June 26th to address the 23 complaints. 24 25 Councilmember Gunn agreed. 26 27 MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To postpone consideration of Resolution 6833, an 28 On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment located 29 at 2400 County Road H2, until June 26 for the purpose of addressing the complaints of the 30 residents. 31 32 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 33 34 G. Resolution 6834, an On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for The 35 Mermaid located at 2200 Highway 10. 36 37 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that the City of Mounds View issued an 38 intoxicating liquor license for The Mermaid in June of 2005, and their renewal is before the 39 Council for consideration. She explained that The Mermaid Intoxicating Liquor License will 40 expire June 30, 2006. 41 42 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane state that The Mermaid has submitted their City liquor 43 license application materials and applicable fees. She added that The Mermaid owes the City a 44 Certificate of Liability Insurance and this liquor license will not be issued until that is received. 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 11 She stated that notice of this public hearing was sent out to residences within a 350 foot radius, 1 and the Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Mounds View/New Brighton Bulletin. 2 3 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that the Mounds View Police Department has 4 issued a satisfactory Police Inquiry and Investigations Report and the Finance Department has 5 issued a satisfactory Utility Building Inquiry report for The Mermaid. 6 7 Acting Mayor Stigney opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m. 8 9 Acting Mayor Stigney closed the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. 10 11 MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6834, 12 an On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for The Mermaid located at 2200 Highway 10. 13 14 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 15 16 H. Resolution 6835, an On Sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor License Renewal for 17 Taiko Sushi located at 2394 Highway 10. 18 19 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that Pro Association Inc., (dba Taiko Sushi Bar) 20 has submitted the City liquor license application materials and applicable fees. She added that 21 Taiko Sushi has not submitted their Certificate of Liability Insurance and this liquor license will 22 not be issue until this Certificate is received. She said the notice of this public hearing was sent 23 out to residences within 350 feet radius, and the Notice of Public Hearing was published in the 24 Mounds View/New Brighton Bulletin. 25 26 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that there were several investigations conducted 27 to determine whether there is a cause for the City to deny Taiko Sushi Bar’s On-Sale Wine and 28 On-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor License. She explained that the Mounds View Police Department has 29 issue a satisfactory Police Inquiry and Investigations report and the Finance Department has 30 issued a satisfactory Utility Billing Inquiry report for Taiko Sushi. She stated that the Fire 31 Marshal has issued a satisfactory Fire Inspection report for the establishment. 32 33 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated Staff recommends opening the Public Hearing 34 for Public Comment and that Staff further recommends that the City Council approve Pro 35 Association, Inc.’s (dba Taiko Sushi Bar) On-Sale Wine and On-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor License 36 pending receipt of their Certificate of Liability Insurance. She stated the time period for this 37 license will be July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. 38 39 Acting Mayor Stigney opened the public hearing at 7:57 p.m. 40 41 Acting Mayor Stigney closed the public hearing at 7:57 p.m. 42 43 MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6835, 44 an On Sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor License Renewal for Taiko Sushi located at 2394 Highway 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 12 10. 1 2 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 3 4 I. Resolution 6838, resolution of Approving Proposals for Technology and 5 Electronics Package for SBM Fire Station #3 6 7 Fire Chief Zikmund said there are four bid packages before the Council tonight, that all four 8 items were all part of the original package as proposed, and budget amounts cover these 9 proposals. He said there is about $100,000 contingency and the project is on schedule and said 10 he will explain the budget. 11 12 Fire Chief Zikmund noted the Driving Simulator, proposed by L-3 Communications. He said 13 that he and other Police Department Staff traveled to Las Vegas, NV, to discuss the simulator 14 with organizations that owned them. He said the simulator includes a truck module, similar to the 15 fire and public works trucks, and a sedan console that simulates the Crown Victoria. Fire Chief 16 Zikmund said the second console is an additional $35,000. 17 18 Fire Chief Zikmund explained that the department envisions uses by all four departments. He 19 said the fire department will likely use the simulator four times a year. He said the simulator will 20 not teach an individual how to drive, but how to think when behind the wheel. He said it is a 21 critical skill that needs to be improved on. He added that his team, the fire department, has 22 experienced two at-fault accidents, which are expensive. He said the simulator teaches drivers to 23 think ahead and cut down on accidents. He said that testing in the trucking industry, which is the 24 largest user of this simulator, indicates that there has been a 42% reduction in accidents of end 25 users. 26 27 Fire Chief Zikmund said the simulator would suffice for 2 out of 3 years of defensive driving 28 training. He said there is one simulator in Alexandria, and it is not conducive to send officers up 29 there or have the simulator shipped. He said there is a space for the simulator in the building, but 30 it will require additional cooling. 31 32 Councilmember Flaherty asked if there is only one in the State, and Fire Chief Zikmund replied 33 that is correct. Councilmember Flaherty and asked if the Alexandria Police Department’s 34 accident rate is lower. Fire Chief Zikmund replied that the simulator is at the Alexandria 35 Technical College, not at the Police Department, and he cannot answer the question. He stated 36 that the Alexandria Technical College does not have any statistics and the only data he would 37 consider valid is that from the trucking industry. 38 39 Councilmember Flaherty said his thoughts about defensive driving classes are that those who 40 take the course retain more by driving in a course and asked if this simulator will have a greater 41 value than a course. Fire Chief Zikmund replied that the simulator has a completely 42 programmable system that has urban, suburban, and rural settings, that it has 35 different 43 vehicles programmed into the database, and that there is an infinite number of stable object and 44 programmable moving objects. 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 13 1 Fire Chief Zikmund explained that in the real world, on a real course, the Department cannot 2 simulate a moving vehicle. He said there could be a simulation with a vehicle moving through 3 intersections, with pedestrians, dogs, etc. which cannot be simulated in real life. He said the 4 simulator also has “pinning” which cannot be practiced with real cars. He said it will make 5 officers and other City drivers practice critical skills that cannot be simulated in real life. He said 6 this was very valuable for the Las Vegas Police Department, with whom he spoke. 7 8 Councilmember Flaherty asked that because this is a big-ticket item, which will cost over 9 $250,000, if no other departments in the area have as simulator. Fire Chief Zikmund replied that 10 no other metro area cities have simulators and that in Minneapolis and Saint Paul, officers have 11 more opportunities in real life than in Mounds View. He stated that in Mounds View, the 12 Department must have time to train volunteers and that, next to Bloomington and Duluth, 13 Mounds View has the largest Fire Department. Fire Chief Zikmund added that the command 14 center software is a separate tool, not combined with simulator. 15 16 Councilmember Flaherty asked if it has been brought up to Blaine and Spring Lake Park and Fire 17 Chief Zikmund responded that Spring Lake Park has cleared the item and Blaine will hear it this 18 Thursday. He said they both heard it at a joint meting and Blaine had a workshop about it a year 19 ago. Acting Mayor Stigney asked if Spring Lake approved the simulator and Fire Chief Zikmund 20 said yes. 21 22 Councilmember Gunn asked if it the simulator will be available for use to other departments. Fire 23 Chief Zikmund said it would be available first to the Fire Departments and Police Departments in 24 the three cities, and other Public Works Departments who have limited training opportunities in 25 sedan training. He said it would then be offered to others, but limited to metro area. 26 Councilmember Gunn asked about ambulance drivers and Fire Chief Zikmund said they are on 27 the list. He noted ambulance drivers have the highest accident rate. 28 29 Acting Mayor Stigney asked if the Police Department will help fund the simulator and Fire Chief 30 Zikmund said with way the budget works, the City of Mounds View is responsible for a 15.5% 31 share and all three cities are paying. Fire Chief Zikmund responded that the Police Department 32 will not be contributing to the simulator cost because the funding is coming from the capital 33 improvement fund. Acting Mayor Stigney asked if the police other City departments will pay 34 rental fees, to which Fire Chief Zikmund responded yes. 35 36 Finance Director Beer pointed out that police departments require training every three years, and 37 Fire Chief Zikmund stated and that Blaine does it every year and said that the track course is 38 require every three years. 39 40 Administrator Ulrich said that the police package would not be included, and Fire Chief 41 Zikmund that the package does include the police component. 42 43 Fire Chief Zikmund reported on the CommandSym software, which is the third part of the 44 package. He said the first task was building the rooms, the second was contracting for the video 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 14 and display screens with Tierney. He said what is before the Council today is the software 1 package to run the system. He stated it is similar to the simulator software and that it has the 2 possibility to take digital pictures, spread smoke and flame throughout the structure, and the fire 3 is navigated by using the arrow keys. He explained that the fire will grow, and if command is 4 making the right decisions about when to apply water and making other correct decisions, the 5 fire will diminish. 6 7 Fire Chief Zikmund explained there are not enough actual incidences for practice and the Fire 8 Department must make up for deficiencies through training. He said they traveled to Orlando 9 and spent a day with the simulator. He said it will also something that could be “sold” to other 10 local fire departments. He said that Hennepin Technical College is using a low-grade version of 11 the software which he believes is not the same. He said this software is as close to the real thing 12 as is possible. 13 14 Fire Chief Zikmund stated the owner of this software is not new to the emergency services. Fire 15 Chief Zikmund said he is convinced that the product is solid, that does not require a lot of 16 technical support, and that the Department’s technical support staff member has spent time with 17 the creator of the software. He said this simulator was envisioned from the beginning with the 18 building, technology, and now this is the software to run it. He added that the software was not 19 proposed earlier due to budget constraints. He stated that there is now $100,000 available in the 20 budget. 21 22 Fire Chief Zikmund spoke regarding the computers and said they were straightforward except 23 they had not been put out to bid. He explained that the computers were bid by the person who 24 has been working with the network in the Department for the last 10 years. He said it was a bit 25 more expensive, but said that it is worth it to keep the same person working on the computers 26 who knew the system. 27 28 Fire Chief Zikmund said they received five bids for furniture, all of which were state-approved 29 bids, that they added tax (which was not included in the original tax), and that Hendrickson 30 Office Group cam in the lowest, even with the tax. He stated the bid is $8,568. 31 32 MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. Resolution 6838, A Resolution Approving Proposals 33 for Technology and Electronics Package for SBM Fire Station #3. 34 35 Acting Mayor Stigney stated the total is $353,576.01, which is within the budget for these 36 components. 37 38 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 39 40 J. Resolution 6826 Approving the Plans and Specifications and Authorizing the 41 Advertisement for Bids and Setting a Bid Date for the Medtronic Utility 42 Extension Project 43 44 Public Works Director Lee said there is one item that he wants to bring to attention, which is the 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 15 existence of two alternates available for the extension of the sanitary sewer on the Medtronic site. 1 He said that the way the plans inspector put it together, there was a base bid that is Medtronic’s 2 preferred alignment, which was indicated on the diagram Public Works Director. He said a 3 concrete casing was discovered, which was highlighted on the diagram in yellow, and if it is 4 usable, it would reduce the cost of the sewer extension by about $75,000. He said there would to 5 be jacking under the ditch for Medtronic to be able to use it. He said the City is continuing to 6 meet with Medtronic to discuss. 7 8 Public Works Director Lee stated Staff is recommending the passing of Resolution 6826 and 9 setting up a meeting with Medtronic to discuss a bid date. 10 11 MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6826, A 12 Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications and Authorizing the Advertisement for Bids 13 and Setting a Bid Date for the Medtronic Utility Extension Project. 14 15 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 16 17 K. Resolution 6839, Resolution to Approve a Charitable Gambling Permit for 18 the Lake Region Hockey Association to conduct Charitable Gambling at 19 Moe’s located at 2400 Highway 10. 20 21 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that The Lake Region Hockey Association, a 22 non-profit charitable organization, would like to hold charitable gambling on a permanent basis 23 at Moe’s (formerly known as Jake’s Sports Café) located in the City of Mounds View. She 24 explained that The Lake Region Hockey Association is a charitable organization to help in 25 funding youth hockey to include Irondale Youth Hockey and Mounds View Youth Hockey 26 programs. 27 28 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that the Lake Region Youth Hockey Association 29 is located in Roseville, and they have more than 30 active members. She noted that this meets 30 the requirements of the Mounds View City Code. She said a list of current members is on file 31 with the City. 32 33 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that the Gambling Control Board requires that 34 local unit of government (city or count) pass a resolution specifically approving or denying the 35 Premises Permit Application. She stated this resolution (approving or denying the application) 36 must be voted on and the resolution forwarded to the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. 37 38 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that Staff recommends approval of the Premise 39 Permit to permit Charitable Gambling for Lake Region Hockey Association at the location stated 40 above. 41 42 Councilmember Flaherty asked if Moe’s opened today. 43 44 MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6839, A 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 16 Resolution Approving a Charitable Gambling Permit for the Lake Region Hockey Association to 1 conduct Charitable Gambling at Moe’s located at 2400 Highway 10. 2 3 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 4 5 L. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 773 Amending the Zoning 6 Code Relating to Landscaping, Fences and Retaining Walls 7 8 Director Ericson stated this is a first reading of an ordinance that would amend the zoning code 9 relating to definitions, which do not currently exist, and adding language under 1103 regarding 10 fences and adding language relating to retaining walls and prohibited materials. 11 12 Director Ericson explained that the Council asked the Planning Commission to consider adding 13 language and the Commission suggested adding language and making changes regarding 14 setbacks. He said the Commission did adopt a resolution, which defined retaining walls and 15 added definitions regarding landscaping and addressed issues regarding the setback issue. 16 17 Director Ericson summarized the changes would add definitions to landscaping and retaining 18 walls as follows: 19 LANDSCAPING: The aesthetic and physical improvement of land by the addition of berms, 20 trees, shrubs, ground cover, crushed rock, wood chips, retaining walls and other functional, 21 ornamental, or decorative features. 22 23 RETAINING WALL: A wall or structure constructed of stone, concrete, woo, or other 24 materials, use to retain soil or as slope transition, or edge of a planting area. 25 26 Director Ericson stated that under 1103.08, in the area discussing fencing, there was an addition 27 which now reads: 28 A fence or retaining wall shall be installed on the applicant’s property. The fence or 29 retaining wall shall not be installed directly over the property line. 30 31 Director Ericson noted that at the bottom of page 2 of the report, there said on the bottom of page 32 2, under Subdivision 7, there was an addition of prohibited materials, which now reads: 33 a. Barbed Wire, razor wire, or other materials which could cause bodily harm shall be 34 prohibited and no fence or property shall be wired and designed to conduct and 35 emit an electrical charge, except as allowed for below. 36 b. Exceptions: Facilities providing essential services or municipal governmental services 37 may erect barbed wire or other materials having a similar deterrence, upon notice 38 to properties within 350 feet and upon approval of the City Council. 39 40 He explained that essential services such as a water supply or something similar that needs 41 protection would require notification. He said that it allows for barbed wire or the like to be used 42 for a homeland security issue. 43 44 Director Ericson said that a Public Hearing would occur during the next meeting on June 26. 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 17 1 Brian Edmonson, 3048 Wooddale Drive, stated he is here because he believes there are two areas 2 of concern. He said that 1104.01, Subdivision 5, which still refers to a terrace or “similar 3 structure” and can cause confusion. He questions what is considered an encroachment and the 4 issue of setbacks and believes that the current language does not specify whether or not retaining 5 walls are allowed on the property line. He believes that it would be more clear if “retaining 6 walls” were added to the 1104.01, Subdivision 5. 7 8 Mr. Edmonson stated the other piece he believes is short of information is protection if a 9 retaining wall is built too high. He said at the back of a property there is a retaining wall nearly 10 6-7 feet high and if a person were to step off, they could be injured. He stated he believes there 11 should be some place that the City requires a protective fence. He said it would help 1104.01, 12 Subdivision 5, was clarified and specifies setbacks. He also stated he questions the phrase 13 “similar structures.” He stated that, regarding his issue, he built 2 additional feet on his fence. 14 15 Director Ericson said the Planning Commission considered a necessity for terraces in the 16 definition and in the opinion of the Planning Commission that the present definition is adequate. 17 He said the Council could make the determination whether or not the word “terrace” needs a 18 different definition. He said the Planning Commission is comfortable with the way the word 19 Terrace has been applied. He said the Planning Commission felt it was not a necessity to make a 20 modification. 21 22 Director Ericson stated, regarding the retaining walls, the Planning Commission felt that in many 23 cases something would be warranted, but it was not necessary to put it in as a code requirement. 24 He said that it is in the City’s best interest to put in rails or warnings if the City is putting in a 25 high retaining wall and that the City has done so in the past. He explained it is not something the 26 Planning Commission believes citizens need to put in their own yards to protect themselves from 27 falling off their own property. 28 29 Councilmember Flaherty said this does stem from the Edmonson’s property and it did come from 30 the change in elevation from the Edmonson’s neighbors. He said the neighbors elevated their 31 property and it is an issue of privacy and security. He asked if the Planning Commission has 32 addressed this issue. 33 34 Director Ericson replied that the amendment does not address a change in elevation. He said if 35 the grade change would mean changes to storm water, the City would be involved, but said that 36 unless that happens, there would be no City involvement. 37 38 Councilmember Flaherty asked if there is no specific limit to the height of a retaining wall and 39 asked if a car could sit up on top of a retaining wall, looking over the neighbor’s fence. He asked 40 if Director Ericson could address such a scenario while making changes to the ordinance. 41 42 Director Ericson explained that when they looked at codes from other communities and did 43 research, no other municipality had any restriction on retaining walls. He said there are areas in 44 Northeast Minneapolis where there are 20-foot retaining walls in order to hold back soil instead 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 18 of building up property. 1 2 Director Ericson said that while Mounds View is relatively flat, there are some areas that could 3 need higher walls. He noted it would be hard to imagine six to eight foot high retaining walls 4 and doubts anyone would install a frivolous retaining wall. He said it is expensive to put in a tall 5 retaining wall. He explained that the Planning Commission could do some research into heights, 6 but the Planning Commission does not believe it is important to regulate the height at this time. 7 8 MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN. To approve the First Reading and Introduction of 9 Ordinance 773 Amending the Zoning Code Relating to Landscaping, Fences and Retaining 10 Walls. 11 12 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 13 14 M. Resolution 6841 Approving the Communications Coordinator to attend the 15 NATOA Conference in Florida. 16 17 Administrator Ulrich stated that this item was reviewed and discussed at the June 5th Council 18 work session. He said it is requested that consideration be given to authorizing Communications 19 Coordinator Kimberly Blackford to attend the National Association of Telecommunications 20 Officers and Advisor’s (NATOA) annual conference August 22 – 25, 206 in Florida. 21 22 Administrator Ulrich stated the item has been budgeted in the 2006 budget as $1,000 and the 23 North Suburban Cable Commission has agreed to pay the tuition of $495. 24 25 MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and approve Resolution 6841, 26 A Resolution Approving the Communications Coordinator to attend the NATOA Conference in 27 Florida. 28 29 Acting Mayor Stigney asked about the expenses that are included in the budget and asked how 30 much they anticipate the cost of the conference. Administrator Ulrich stated that the total cost, 31 including tuition, is about $1,200 - $1,300. 32 33 Acting Mayor Stigney stated his opinion is that to send a new employee, a probationary 34 employee, to Florida is an unnecessary expense for taxpayers. He said it is a frivolous expense 35 and he does not support it. 36 37 Councilmember Gunn said that the employee cannot help the date of the conference, versus her 38 date of hire. She said if this were a two or three year employee, there would be no question. She 39 stated she believes the Council needs to give the employee every opportunity to build skills. 40 41 Acting Mayor Stigney said that he supports any opportunity for the employee to go to local 42 conferences, but does not believe the Council should spend the money on a national conference. 43 44 Ayes – 3 Nays – 1 (Stigney) Motion failed. 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 19 1 It was noted that three affirmative votes are required for approval of this item. 2 3 N. Resolution 6849 Resolution Authorizing Severance Package for William 4 Hanggi, Mounds View Public Works Lead Utility Worker. 5 6 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that William Hanggi has retired from the 7 Mounds View Public Works Department effective May 31, 2006 and Resolution 6849 authorizes 8 severance payment to William Hanggi. She stated these payments are in accordance with the 9 Mounds View Personnel manual and the current Public Works Bargaining Agreement. 10 11 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that Resolution 6849 provides a cash payout for 12 Mr. Hanggi’s compensatory time hours of $1,212 (50 hours comp time x $24.24 hourly wage). 13 She explained that this is in accordance with the current Public Works Collective Bargaining 14 Agreement. 15 16 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that Resolution 6849 provides a payout of Mr. 17 Hanggi’s vacation hours. She stated that in accordance with the current Public Works Collective 18 Bargaining Agreement, Mr. Hanggi is eligible to contribute accrued vacation time towards the 19 Retirement Health Savings Plan. She explained this is calculated as 302.19 hours times his 20 hourly salary of $24.24, which equates to $7,325.09 contribution to the Retirement Health 21 Savings Plan. 22 23 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated Resolution 6849 also provides for a payout of 24 Mr. Hanggi’s sick time. She stated that in accordance with the Public Works Collective 25 Bargaining Agreement, he is eligible to contribute 65% of his accumulate and banked sick leave 26 for contribution to the employee Retirement Health Savings Plan. She stated this is calculated as 27 973.16 accrued/banked sick hours times 65% times his hourly rate of $24.24. She explained this 28 comes to $15,333.01 to be contributed to the Retirement Health Savings Plan. 29 30 Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that Staff recommends severance payment and 31 contribution to the Retirement Health Savings Plan for William Hanggi in accordance with the 32 City’s Personnel Manual and current Public Works Collective Bargaining Agreement. She 33 explained that this Severance Package may be adjusted at a later date pending the ratification of 34 the 2006 – 2007 Public Works Contract. She stated that if the Severance Package is adjusted, 35 then it will be presented at a City Council meeting with approval by Resolution. 36 37 Councilmember Flaherty stated that every time this issue comes up, he asks if anybody ever takes 38 sick hours and wondered if it was more like a savings account. He stated people retire and have 39 large amounts of hours accrued in sick time and he can’t believe that nobody gets sick. 40 41 Administrator Ulrich stated that Mr. Hanggi was a 33-year employee, that the contracts were 42 negotiated to only allow 50% of a maximum of 960 hours. Mr. Hanggi is the last of the Public 43 works employees to be grandfathered in at the higher 65% rate. 44 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 20 Finance Director Beer said these types of payout are the exceptions and that Mr. Hanggi is the 1 last of the Public Works employees who are eligible for the 65% and the rest are covered by 50% 2 of up to 960 hours. 3 4 MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6849, A 5 Resolution Authorizing Severance Package for William Hanggi, Mounds View Public Works 6 Lead Utility Worker. 7 8 Acting Mayor Stigney stated Mr. Hanggi will be missed and congratulated him on his retirement. 9 10 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 11 12 O. Resolution 6844 Appointing Mike Schnur as the Lead Utility Worker and 13 Authorizing the Advertisement for the Vacancy in the Water Division of the 14 Public Works Department 15 16 Public Works Director Lee said with the retirement of Mr. Hanggi, there is a vacancy. He said 17 the position was advertised in the Pioneer Press, Star Tribune and Mounds View/New Brighton 18 Bulletin. He said there were six applicants and only one met the requirement of having a Class B 19 license. He said that Mr. Schnur was the only applicant who met the requirement and that he is 20 already a City employee. He requested the appointment be made as of June 1st since Mr. Schnur 21 has been acting as the Lead Worker since then. He said based on the Public Works Collective 22 Bargaining Unit contract, the pay for this position would be $24.24 an hour. 23 24 MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6844, A 25 Resolution Appointing Mike Schnur as the Lead Utility Worker and Authorizing the 26 Advertisement for the Vacancy in the Water Division of the Public Works Department. 27 28 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 29 30 The Mounds View City Council recessed at 8:50 p.m. 31 The Council resumed the meeting at 8:53 p.m. 32 33 P. Resolution 6845 Approving Change Orders No. 27 through 30 for the City 34 Hall Rehabilitation Project 35 36 Public Works Director Lee said the City has submitted Change Orders 27 through 30 for 37 approval. He said at the last meeting, there were several questions regarding the City Hall 38 project. He explained that an automatic door opener in the front entry way is not required by the 39 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and that it should be easy to open, but quotes will be 40 requested for the re-installation of the automatic door. 41 42 Public Works Director Lee stated that the consultant indicated that to go with a matching stacked 43 brick option in the front of the City Hall would have cost the City an additional $4,000. 44 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 21 Public Works Director Lee addressed the issue of the gate that was not included and stated there 1 was an additional cost incurred by the City. He stated Staff is recommending approval of Change 2 Orders 27 through 30 and is looking for direction. 3 4 Acting Mayor Stigney stated the automatic door openers were taken out and that SEH said it was 5 decided not to include them because of cost issues. He said not including the automatic doors is 6 not a cost-saving issue, it is an issue of it being accessible to those in wheelchairs. He explained 7 someone made a blunder, because the doors open out instead of in and that the automatic doors 8 should be re-installed at SEH’s costs. 9 10 Acting Mayor Stigney addressed the front vestibule and stated that it is a problem because it 11 looks different than the rest of the City Hall. He stated that as far as the $4,000 is concerned, 12 someone should have addressed the issue of the bricks matching before it was done. He stated 13 that he believes the architect or whomever made the decision should make the corrections 14 without charge. 15 16 Acting Mayor Stigney also said the front of the chambers look bad and asked who authorized the 17 new front. He asked how it came about. He stated it is his opinion that all they needed was 18 wheelchair access and now they got the entire new front. He asked that the people who made the 19 mistake fix it. 20 21 Councilmember Flaherty agreed with Acting Mayor Stigney, particularly with the bricks on the 22 front vestibule that do not match. He said of course the Council wanted it to match and believes 23 it is something that could be taken care of, or at least considered. He asked if the City still has 24 the automatic doors, and Public Works Director Lee said he does not know. He said they were 25 eliminated because they were a cost saving measure and because they cost a lot to maintain. 26 27 Councilmember Gunn said she cannot believe the automatic doors are not require. Acting Mayor 28 Stigney said the current doors might minimally meet the standard, but the City is taking a step 29 back without the automatic doors. Public Works Director Lee responded he will look into what 30 happened to the doors and get a quote. 31 32 Councilmember Flaherty said that he is bothered that the Council may have change orders that 33 will eventually equal the original amount. Acting Mayor Stigney asked when it will stop, and 34 stated he believes the additional costs will end at $1.6 million, which was originally proposed. 35 36 Public Works Director Lee stated that in the packet there are all outstanding Change Orders and 37 that it should be a complete list. 38 39 Councilmember Flaherty asked Public Works Director Lee to look into the automatic doors, 40 whether the City still has the old ones, and if they will get bids for new ones. He said he would 41 not have voted for it as a “cost saving measure” 42 43 MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6845, A 44 Resolution Approving Change Orders No. 27 through 30 for the City Hall Rehabilitation Project. 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 22 1 Acting Mayor Stigney stated that he believes the architect, designer, or whomever made the 2 mistake should come back and fix it themselves. Councilmember Gunn replied that the Change 3 Orders refer to other things. Acting Mayor Stigney said that, as he said before, there needs to be 4 an ending point and that the architect should fix things at their cost. 5 6 Councilmember Gunn asked if Acting Mayor Stigney will vote no on all of them, for example 7 the fire extinguisher. Acting Mayor Stigney replied that with they way they are presented, he 8 would vote against them unless someone wants to separate them out. Acting Mayor Stigney said 9 he did not vote for the last batch of changes either. 10 11 Councilmember Gunn stated her support to postpone action until the next Council meeting 12 because she believes they need to be brought before a full Council. 13 14 Acting Mayor Stigney asked if they need three affirmative votes to pass, and Administrator 15 Ulrich said yes. 16 17 Councilmember Flaherty WITHDREW MOTION to approve and Councilmember Gunn 18 withdrew her second. 19 20 MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/STIGNEY. To postpone consideration of Resolution 6845, 21 A Resolution Approving Change Orders No. 27 through 30 for the City Hall Rehabilitation 22 Project until next Council meeting. 23 24 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 25 26 Q. Resolution 6847 Approving Change Order No. 1 for the Random Park 27 Building Replacement Project 28 29 Public Works Director Lee said that on May 22nd, Staff presented a proposal to add a sprinkler to 30 Random Park building. He stated that Change Order No. 1 includes the sprinkler system itself, a 31 4-inch water system to support the sprinkler system itself, and a one-inch domestic water service 32 line. 33 34 Public Works Director Lee stated the quote is now $52,322.55 which is about $8,980 more than 35 was quote on May 22nd. He stated the original quote did not include restoration of Long Lake 36 Road or traffic control entering the park and making the connection to the 12 inch main on Long 37 Lake Road. 38 39 Public Works Director Lee said the quote did not include a post-indicator valve which is located 40 on outside of building nor a one-inch service line and that the current 3/4-inch. He said it did not 41 include 1”service line, and that that current 3/4” –inch line would not accommodate the current 42 toilets. He said it makes sense to put in 1’ service line. He explained that the original $4,000 fee 43 was negotiated down to $2,500. He stated staff is recommending approval. 44 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 23 Councilmember Flaherty said that this request took the City by surprise. He said that this should 1 have been caught and asked if there is any work the City can do itself, rather than having it 2 contracted. Public Works Director Lee replied that Staff looked into the possibility and the 3 major cost is the excavation and that the City could not do it any cheaper. 4 5 Councilmember Flaherty asked if the City is qualified to do it, and Public Works Director Lee 6 said yes. Councilmember Flaherty asked if the City could do it, and Public Works Director Lee 7 said that it would cost just as much. 8 9 Public Works Director Lee stated the contractor could do it more efficiently than the City. 10 Councilmember Flaherty said it will cost time, but is wondering if the City can reduce 11 expenditure by using City employees and not have the complete expenditure by contracting. 12 13 Public Works Director Lee replied that it will cause delays in the building and that Staff can look 14 into it and inform the Council about what will not get done. He said that City crews would be 15 pulled off other projects if they were asked to also do the Random Park project. He said even 16 considering the possibility of the City doing it, it would cause a delays in other projects. 17 18 MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6847, A 19 Resolution Approving Change Order No. 1 for the Random Park Building Replacement Project. 20 21 Acting Mayor Stigney commented that rather than pumping $52,000 into Random Park for the 22 sprinkler system, the Council should be looking at the code because the Council has made a more 23 restrictive requirement and that he does not support putting money into project. 24 25 Ayes – 2 Nays – 1 (Stigney) Motion failed. 26 27 It was noted that three affirmative votes are required for approval of this item. 28 29 Councilmember Flaherty asked what happens next. Finance Director Beer asked Acting Mayor 30 Stigney if he would consider a modified resolution. Public Works Director Lee pointed out that 31 the contractor could file damages against the City and that they are losing patience. 32 33 Administrator Ulrich asked what are the consequences. 34 35 Acting Mayor Stigney said it is understandable, and that the City needs to look at changing the 36 requirement. 37 38 Councilmember Flaherty asked how the Council brings this issue back. Administrator Ulrich 39 said it would have to be brought back and be reconsidered on the next agenda. 40 41 Councilmember Flaherty asked what it does to the contract. Public Works Director Lee stated 42 that the contractor would be allowed to finish the building and it would have to be retroactively 43 fitted with sprinklers. He said the contractor may be able to wait a few weeks. He said the 44 current contractor could finish without sprinklers on their time schedule. 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 24 1 Councilmember Gunn asked how the Council can bring this issue back. Administrator Ulrich 2 said it needs to be a motion to reconsider on the next agenda and either Councilmember Gunn or 3 Councilmember Flaherty could bring it back for consideration. 4 5 8. CONSENT AGENDA 6 7 Councilmember Flaherty asked to remove Items B, G, and J. 8 9 A. Licenses for Approval 10 B. Resolution 6842, Approving a Revision to Larry Siluk’s Severance Package. 11 C. Resolution 6850 Appointing North Suburban Cable Commission Alternate 12 Member 13 D. Set a Public Hearing for Monday, June 26, 2006 at 7:05 pm to Consider the 14 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 773 Amending the Zoning Code 15 Relating to Landscaping, Fences and Retaining Walls 16 E. Set a Public Hearing for Monday, June 26, 2006 at 7:10 pm to Consider a 17 Rezoning Request Submitted by Integra Homes Relating to the Properties at 18 2901 and 2925 County Road 10 and the West Half of 8060 Groveland Road 19 to R-3, Medium Density Residential 20 F. Set a Public Hearing for Monday, June 26, 2006 at 7:15 pm to Consider a 21 Conditional Use Permit for Midwest Motor Express Located at 2169 22 Mustang Drive. 23 G. Resolution 6843 Accepting the Donation of Children’s Play Apparatus from 24 YMCA for the Community Center. 25 H. Resolution 6846 Awarding a Construction Contract for the Hidden Hollow 26 South Street and Utility Installation Project 27 I. Resolution 6827 Authorization to hire Justin Solberg as Part Time Public 28 Service Officer for the Police Department. 29 J. Resolution 6851 Authorization to Purchase a Replacement Squad Car for a 30 Totaled Squad Car utilizing Payment from Progressive Insurance 31 Companies and Funds from the Vehicle and Equipment Fund. 32 33 MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/STIGNEY. To Approve the Consent Agenda as amended. 34 35 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 36 37 B. Resolution 6842, Approving a Revision to Larry Siluk’s Severance Package. 38 39 Councilmember Flaherty explained he pulled Item B but has no questions. 40 41 MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6842, A 42 Resolution Approving a Revision to Larry Siluk’s Severance Package. 43 44 Acting Mayor Stigney said it is an additional payout per the agreement. 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 25 1 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 2 3 G. Resolution 6843 Accepting the Donation of Children’s Play Apparatus from 4 YMCA for the Community Center. 5 6 Councilmember Flaherty explained he removed Item G because of the time frame. 7 8 Administrator Ulrich said the playground was supposed to be moved this week or next and said 9 he did not know when it would be moved. He said he would check and report back. 10 11 Councilmember Flaherty would like to thank the YMCA for the gift. He explained that new, it 12 would cost $9,000 – $12,000. 13 14 MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6843, A 15 Resolution Accepting the Donation of Children’s Play Apparatus from YMCA for the 16 Community Center. 17 18 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 19 20 J. Resolution 6851 Authorization to Purchase a Replacement Squad Car for a 21 Totaled Squad Car utilizing Payment from Progressive Insurance 22 Companies and Funds from the Vehicle and Equipment Fund. 23 24 Councilmember Flaherty asked Police Chief Sommer for a report. 25 26 Police Chief Sumner stated the patrol car was totaled on County Road 10 and Edgewood. He said 27 the other driver’s insurance company would accept 100% of the liability for the damage and will 28 cover cost of the squad car and removing police equipment and installing it onto another car. He 29 explained that the car will cost $12,000 and equipment is $3,000. He said that Superior Ford will 30 offer a new squad car at a cost of $23,000. He stated Staff recommends it be replaced with 31 funding from the insurance company and $11,000 from vehicle and equipment fund, which will 32 return the fleet to its previous operational number. 33 34 Councilmember Flaherty asked if officer was hurt and Chief Sommer said yes, but the officer 35 was not hospitalized. He said the Officer is still receiving follow-up care. 36 37 Acting Mayor Stigney asked if anyone has checked the blue-book value of the car. Chief 38 Sommer said that it is the blue-book value of the car and that vehicles do depreciate quickly in 39 the first few years. Chief Sommer said that $12,000 is the cost of the car as determined by the 40 blue-book. 41 42 Acting Mayor Stigney asked if it was the blue book value as determined by the insurance 43 company or by blue book. Chief Sommer responded it is his understanding that it is an accurate 44 figure. He stated it is the insurance company’s offer. Administrator Ulrich said that the City 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 26 should determine the value. 1 2 Acting Mayor Stigney asked if tax value was included and Police Chief Sommer said that the tax 3 value is not included. Acting Mayor Stigney said it is his understanding that the insurance 4 company should pay for the replacement value including 6% tax. Acting Mayor Stigney said he 5 wants to make sure the City is getting a fair deal 6 7 Public Works Director Lee said the insurance company could debate if they wanted to pay the 8 entire value and Acting Mayor Stigney asked what 100% of the loss is. Police Chief Sommer 9 said he could try and re-negotiate with the insurance company but pointed out that the current 10 offer is the best he can get with the insurance company since he has already negotiated with him. 11 12 Acting Mayor Stigney asked if the City’s insurance company has negotiated with the other 13 insurance. Police Chief Sommer said that the City has a $25,000 deductible and will not 14 negotiate with the other insurance company. Police Chief Sommer said that it is the City’s 15 responsibility. 16 17 Finance Director Beer said he would ask the City’s insurance to look into the situation. Police 18 Chief Sommer said he has met with the City’s agent and the deductible is higher than the value 19 of the vehicle. 20 21 Chief Sommer stated he would like approval to move forward with the understanding that if it is 22 under-valued it will be re-negotiated. He said that there would be a stipulation that it would be 23 re-negotiated. 24 25 MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/FLAHERTY. To adopt Resolution 6851, A Resolution 26 Authorization to Purchase a Replacement Squad Car for a Totaled Squad Car utilizing Payment 27 from Progressive Insurance Companies and Funds from the Vehicle and Equipment Fund subject 28 to staff checking whether the settlement is fair and look at the tax issue before accepting 29 insurance payout. 30 31 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 32 33 9. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS 34 35 Councilmember Flaherty asked about page 13 and the amount of shredding that is done. 36 Administrator Ulrich replied that quite a bit of shredding is done and that the shredding company 37 does large-volume, cross-cut shredding. 38 39 Police Chief Sommer said the service picks up the documents which are shredded onsite. He 40 said a staff member accompanies the shredding company to the shredding. Police Chief Sommer 41 said a high-powered shredder and maintenance would cost a couple thousand dollars and that it is 42 about an equal cost. 43 44 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 27 Councilmember Flaherty said he can justify the documents from the police department being 1 shredded by an outside company, especially considering staff time. 2 3 Councilmember Flaherty addressed page 14, Spring Lake Auto, asking about a squad car repair. 4 Police Chief Sommer replied that it was body damage from another squad car accident. Acting 5 Mayor Stigney asked about particulars and Police Chief Sommer said it was an accident 6 involving an officer who was checking a building and hit a post going around the building. 7 8 Acting Mayor Stigney asked about page 7, advertising on the internet for $51.16. Finance 9 Director Beer replied that it is internet access for the anyone who uses the banquet facilities. 10 Acting Mayor Stigney asked if the costs was high, and Finance Director Beer said it is Comcast 11 internet and it is expensive. 12 13 Acting Mayor Stigney asked that if all internet was free in the City buildings, why it cannot be 14 hooked up in the banquet room. Finance Director Beer replied that it would have to be allowed 15 behind the City firewall and that is not a good idea. 16 17 Acting Mayor Stigney asked about an item on page 9 for the arms for chairs, and Police Chief 18 Sommer replied the chairs were not ordered with arms and they needed to be added. He said it 19 would come out of the Police Department budget, not project costs. 20 21 MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/STIGNEY. To approve the Just and Correct Claims as Presented. 22 23 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried 24 25 10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 26 27 A. May 22, 2006 City Council Meeting Minutes 28 29 MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN. To Approve the May 22, 2006 City Council 30 meeting minutes as presented. 31 32 Ayes – 3 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 33 34 11. REPORTS 35 36 A. Reports of Mayor and Council 37 38 Acting Mayor Stigney reminded viewers about the street meeting June on 15th that will be 39 broadcast live on Channel 16 and open to the public in the City Council Chambers. He said it 40 will also be rebroadcast. He said it will deal with reconstruction with streets, even those not on 41 the agenda, and will answer many questions. 42 43 Councilmember Flaherty addressed an e-mail from a resident regarding recreation fires. The 44 resident said he is disappointed that Mounds View allows open burning of trash, furniture, and 45 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 28 wood. He said there are ordinances and if there is burning that is not allowed, to please contact 1 the City. Councilmember Flaherty said he wanted to bring it to the attention of the City and 2 Police that there are these kinds of things going on. 3 4 Administrator Ulrich invited Councilmembers to attend the Ramsey County League of Local 5 Governments meeting. 6 7 Administrator Ulrich said the bill regarding the Cable Access Channel passed last week. He 8 mentioned that Representative McCullum did vote against it, but it passed with a large margin. 9 He stated there will be an update. 10 11 B. Reports of Staff 12 13 None. 14 15 1. Police Department Quarterly Report 16 17 Police Chief Sommer said that during the time of the report, January – March 2006, the 18 Department was based out of the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office Arden Hills during the City 19 Hall/Police Department was remodeled. 20 21 Police Chief Sommer said the department received 1559 calls to the 911 service which was close 22 to the number received last year during the same time. He said the department issued a total of 23 603 driving citations, which consisted 275 court citations, and 328 administrative citations. He 24 explained there were 130 cases assigned for further follow-up with investigators. 25 26 Police Chief Sommer said there were 382 crime reports of more serious crimes. He stated that 27 90 of those were theft or fraud, which remain the most common type of crime. He said DWI and 28 other accidents with criminal activity are the second most common, and that damaged property 29 and trespass violations are the third most common crimes. 30 31 Police Chief Sommer gave a report from the School Resource Officer in Edgewood Middle 32 School, which funded by School District. He stated Officer Kirk Leach who will be moving into 33 a role as an investigator and the school position will be open for another officer assignment. 34 35 Police Chief Sommer gave a report from the Crime Prevention Officer, which listed courses 36 received by City staff members. He addressed a grant that was received from MNDot for officers 37 to do extra shifts enforcing traffic. He stated the current concentration if for seatbelt violations. 38 Next year, Chief Sommer said the department is looking to combine efforts with the New 39 Brighton, Roseville, and Ramsey County Sheriff’s Departments. 40 41 Police Chief Sommer stated that Ramsey County’s 800 Megahertz system will begin testing in 42 Mounds View in next month or so. He stated that the Police Department will be one of the first 43 to make the transition to the new system and it will occur as soon as it is offered. He said it will 44 Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 29 take about a year to transition all cities to the new system and St. Paul will be the last. Police 1 Chief Sommer also stated that he attached a financial report from first quarter. 2 3 Acting Mayor Stigney commented that he noticed zero noise complaints from January – March, 4 but there were noise complaints from citizens about Robert’s Sports Bar who spoke earlier. 5 Chief Sommer stated he will note the complaints on the next report. 6 7 Acting Mayor Stigney said at the last work session, they discussed window treatments, and noted 8 that Associate Heller saved $142 by re-bidding. Acting Mayor Stigney commended Associate 9 Heller for her work. 10 11 12. Next Council Work Session: Monday, July 17, 2006, at 7 p.m. 12 Next Council Meeting: Monday, June 26, 2006, at 7 p.m. 13 14 13. ADJOURNMENT 15 16 The meeting was adjourned at 9:44 p.m. 17 18 Transcribed by: 19 20 Lauren McKay 21 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 22