HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1990/09/17 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW -
CITY COUNCIL
SEPTEMBER 17, 1990
7 :00 P.M.
f` f
1. Continued Discussion of Silver View Park Improvement
Plan x,
r V
2 . Discussion of Fire Service Bond Referendum Campaign .
3 . Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Highway
10 Development Moratorium
4. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Highway
610 Resolution
5. Continued Discussion of Storm Water Utility410 i
6 . Considertion of Staff Memorandum Regarding the
Lighting of the City Hall West Softball Fields
7 . Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Back-Up
Optech System for General Election
8 . Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Policy /-
on Council Meeting Video Tapes
9 . Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Temporary
Vending Permits
• r,
_ -
Mounds View City Council
August 26, 1990 Duane W. McCarty
8060 Long Lake Rd.
Mounds View, Minn. 55112
Questions regarding the Mayor' srepeated claims that various
problems of this council are directly related to actions (or
implied inactions) of past City Councils .and restrictive state
laws regarding recent City issues .
New Highway 10/610 (118)
In a Focus news article dated April 4, 1990 regarding the new Hwy.
10 plans, Mayor Hankner was quoted as stating that . . . " 'previous
Mounds View councils had failed to take any action on the issue. . .
which is why we find ourselves in this position'' . This statement
was repeated on several occasions and in fact was included as part
of Council Resolution #3024 approving new Highway 10/610 and
Realigning County Road J.
• I personally presented this council with a lengthy list of actions
taken by past councils regarding the Hwy 10 project . That list
was only a partial record of the many times Hwy 10 was addressed
by Mounds View City Councils dating back to 1971 . For what ever
reasons- - funding, right-of-way acquisitions etc . new state
highway constructions take a very long time. And, the public
hearing processes connected therewith are extremely important to
those projects . All past hearings, except one, held by the
Minnesota Department of Transportation, to receive comments or
approvals from local units of government were attended by past
Mounds View Officials . The MNDOT process began with corridor
selections, specific alignment selection, environmental impact
statements, and final design and location plans .
Official transcripts of those hearings show that the only hearing
not attended, or response missing from Mounds View, was the
critical Design and Location hearing held in October of 1986 .
Mayor Hankner' s charges are not totally without merit . It is true
that members of the majority of this council, who were in office
at that time, did not respond on behalf of Mounds View residents .
Question:
Why was that missed representation on the final design and
location process in 1986 (which this council failed to provide)
• often represented as blame upon other City Councils by this
administration?
y
Mounds View City Council - •
2
In her August 13, 1990 statement to the Community, the Mayor
emphasized that the amount of money paid our departing Clerk
Administrator was determined by a contract written by Mr. Pauley
and executed by former Mayor Duane McCarty in 1984 . I am
confident this statement was made with full knowledge that
contractual agreements made on behalf of the city are consummated
with the consent of the entire council and executed by the Mayor
as a matter of administrative form required by the City Charter.
As the Oct . 22, 1984 official minutes of the City Council show;
the motion introducing the contract written by the
Clerk/Administrator was made by then Councilmember Hankner,
Seconded by then Councilmember Doty and received unanimous
approval by the entire council.
Question:
If this contract tied the hands of this council in any way, why
wasn' t there a revision in the past 6 years since it' s original
adoption to account for changing times and needs of the City?
The Mayor' s Aug. 13, 1990 statement also implied a difficulty in
that the contract with Mr. Pauley did not contain a termination
date nor renegotiation terms .
The Clerk/Administrator is employed at the will and pleasure of
the City Council. If termination of the contract is supportable,
then such action simply takes the majority vote of the City
Council . This is a very basic tenant of public administration.
Question:
What need has been identified that written authority would be any
stronger than the unwritten understanding that the Council is the
employer and as such has the power to dismiss employees when
appropriate under termination authority?
What further need has been identified to require renegotiation
terms beyond the annual reviewal of the Clerk/Administrators
performance and authorization of salary increases to reward
faithful services rendered, or the termination of employment as
noted above?
The Mayor further stated in her Aug. 13, 1990 paper, and was also
quoted in local news articles that the separation package given •
the Clerk/Administrator was entirely required by the referenced
employment contract .
Mounds View City Council 3
Article 10 of the Employment Contract with the Clerk/Administrator
provides for an option to be selected by the City Council in case
of termination. One course is to dismiss by immediate termination
and 6i months severance pay or alternatively dismiss with 6 months
notice and no severance pay. Additional severance payments that
apply to all employees such as accrued vacation and sick pay are
set in City Code Chapter 6 and must be honored in any case.
It is only under Article 10 of the contract where the council
initiates the termination of employment that immediate severance
pay in the amount of 6 months salary must be paid in addition to
accrued vacations etc.
However, all this is beside the real point . In Mayor Hankner' s
statement of Aug. 13, 1990 it was clearly stated that- - [Quote]
. . . " 'Mr. Pauley, Clerk-Administrator resigned effective July 20,
1990 . It was essentially a mutual agreement between Mr. Pauley
and the. City Council . The council voted unanimously to accept Mr.
Pauley':s resignation. '" Of course we all know by the Mayor' s
statement that this was a mutually agreed departure and not a case
. of firing an employee.
Question:
If Mr. Pauley voluntarily resigned, then why wasn't Article 11 of
the contract enforced by the Council which states that The City
agrees to pay Mr. Paulev upon his resignation an amount equal to
all of his accrued vacation leave? Here, severances are not
provided. (Article 9 of the contract requires a 45 day written
notice by the Clerk/Administrator before voluntarily resigning. )
Perusal of both the referenced contract and city code fails to
point -to any obvious requirement that the city is obligated to pay
future costs of health benefits or expense accounts for use of
personal automobiles, after employment termination, under any
termination conditions.
•
Question:
Why was amounts equal to 6 months of health benefits and
administrative expenses (that this employee will neither be
incurring or performing) paid by the city of Mounds View as part
of the severance package?
•
- _
Mounds View City Council 4
The Mayor also stated in her Aug. 13, 1990 presentation that it
was common knowledge that Mr. Pauley had been applying and
interviewing for jobs for at least the last five years .
If this situation has been deteriorating for such a long period of
time; it would seem honorable and prudent for the council to work
out an arrangement and assist the Clerk/Administrator in finding
other suitable employment before reaching his tenth anniversary
thereby incurring further obligations on the part of the City.
Question:
Why didn't the City Council take the initiative long ago rather
than waiting 5 years before acting?
Explanations regarding the council' s inability to answer questions
regarding this matter have stood deep in the data privacy act of
previous state law.
Question:
If the departure of the Clerk/Administrator was indeed mutual and •
lacking any public consequences; Why didn' t the council wait 10
days and act under the well known and expected revision in
applicable state law that would have allowed open discussion by
both Mr. Pauley and the City Council?
I base these statements and questions on existing facts recorded
within official public records of the Minnesota Department of
Transportation and the City of Mounds View.
410 _ _
MEMORANDUM OR UNDERSTANDING
between the
•
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL .
and
DONALD F. PAULEY, CLERK-ADMINISTRATOR
The Mounds View City Council hereby enters into a Memorandum
of Understanding with Mr. Donald F. Pauley to provide the
necessary services to the City of Mounds View as outlined in
Chapter 6 of the City ' s Home Rule Charter. The City and
Mr . Pauley agree to the following salary and fringe benefits
and other provisions of employment :
1 ) Salary - $41 , 600 effective January 1 , 1985 to be
reviewed on an annual basis at the same time as
similar consideration is generally given to other
City evmp, ees. It is further agreed that considera-
AIzr
• tion until given to a merit increase of $2, 080 at the
time of performance review which will occur no later
than December 17, 1984.
2 ) The City will provide the standard insurance packace
as provided to other City employees covered by
Chapter 6 of the Municipal Code or deposit into the
ICMA - Retirement Corporation Deferred Compensation
Program in the name of Donald F. Pauley, the full
amount budgeted for the City ' s monthly insurance
contribution for the Clerk-Administrator position , as
- currently being implemented by an addendum to the
Memor. ru-U m of Un-de-rs -and- rg dated Janua
which is attached hereto and made part of this
Memorandum of Understanding .
3 ) The City will provide a $50, 000 term life insurance
policy in the name of Donald F. Pauley from the
City ' s carrier of term life insurance provided to
other City employees .
4 ) The City will provide payment of the annual premium
for a disability insurance policy selected and
contracted for by Mr. Pauley.
• _ 5 ) The City will provide both vacation and sick leave to
be accrued at the standard rate for all City
employees covered by Chapter 6 of the Municipal Code .
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
PAGE TWO
6 ) The City will pay for all expenditures within the
' limitations established in the annual budget,
relative to Mr. Pauley ' s membership in the ICMA and
Minnesota City Management Association and attendance
at the annual conferences of the ICMA, LMC , and
Minnesota City Management Association and such other
meetings and activities as may be necessary for the
performance of his duties as Clerk-Administrator and
authorized by the City Council .
71 In consideration of a travel and expense allowance in
the amount of $150 per month or whatever might be
provided for in the annual budget, Mr. Pauley will
provide the use of his personal vehicle for daily
City business.
8 ) Mr . Pauley agrees to reside within the City' s
Corporate limits during his term of employment with
the City. •
9 ) Mr . Pauley agrees to provide the City with at least
45 days written notice before voluntarily resigning .
10 ) The City agrees tb provide Mr. Pauley with at least 6
months notice before terminating his employment as
Clerk-Administrator or at the option of the City
Council , the City shall give Mr. Pauley severance pay
equal to 6 months aggregate salary. The City shall
not be required to give such notice or severance pay
if Mr. Pauley is convicted of embezzlement of City
- funds or other crimes involving moral terpitude which
- • • • , • - • isgrace e ity.
11 ) The City agrees to pay Mr. Pauley upon his
resignation or termination an amount equal to all of
his accrued vacation leave .
12 ) The City agrees, pursuant to Resolution N . 1305 and
An Agreement Relating To Deferred Compensation dated
June 23 , 1981 which are attached hereto and made a
part of this Memorandum of Understanding , to
contribute to the ICMA Retirement Corporation
Deferred Compensation Program in an amount equal to
the employer' s contribution which would be required
by Minnesota Statutes Section 353 . 27 , Subdivisions 3
and 3a , as amended , if Mr. Pauley were a member of
the Public Employees Retirement Association .
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting October 22 , 1984
• Page Five
Finance Director Brager reviewed the activities of
the Finance Department for the past quarter , with
the main concentration being on completing the
budget and preparing for elections .
Park Director Anderson reviewed the activities of
the forestry and 'park and recreation areas for the
past quarter . He advised that Mary Saarion would
be returning to work from her maternity leave on
December 1 .
Mrs . Werdine asked if there was a way to let people
know of the need for volunteers to work with the
handicapped swim program. Director Anderson replied
they could put an article in the newsletter .
Police Chief Ramacher reviewed the activites of the
Police Department for the past quarter . He reported
they will be hiring a person for the CSO after the
first of the year.
Counciltember Blanchard inquired about the missing
stop sign at Sherwood and Fairchild . Chief Ramacher
replied he would look into it .
SClerk/Ajnjstrator
Pauley advised that all the
departments are doing very well within their
budgets for 1984 .
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed proposed Resolu- 11 . Consideration
tion No . 1823 .
Resolution No
Motion/Second : Linke/Blanchard to approve Resolution 1823
No . 1823 authorizing the City of Mounds View to file
an application and execute a grant project agreement to
develop open space under the provision of the State
Natural Resource Fund , and waive the reading .
3 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carrie.
Motion/Second : Hankner/Doty to approve the memo
of understanding between the City of Mounds12 . UnMederstand of
and Donald F. Pauley, Clerk/Admiistra . View with Clerk/Ad.:
5 ayes 0 nays Pauley
Motion Carrie:
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERSU6A(11I
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
DATE: SEPTEMBER 13, 1990
SUBJECT: FURTHER DISCUSSION REGARDING SILVER VIEW PARK
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
As directed by Council, letters have been sent to Mr. Ash representing the Silver Lake
Woods Homeowners Association, the Parks and Recreation Commissioners and Task
Force members requesting their presence at the agenda meeting to further discuss the
improvement proposal for Silver View Park.
It is staffs hope that the Council will decide on revisions to the plan as desired or as
seen fit so that staff can insert the revisions to the plan as quickly as possible for final
approval on September 24, 1990.
• MS/SL
•
MEMO TO: MAYOR & COUNCILMEMBERS
• - _
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1990
SUBJECT: SYNOPSIS OF CONCERNS EXPRESSED BY THE MANOR
• HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION -.SEPTEMBER 5, 1990
On Wednesday, September 5, 1990, Councilrnembers Blanchard, Paone and I attended
the annual Silver Lake Woods Manor Homeowners Association meeting to listen to
their concerns regarding the Silver View Park proposal. The membership agreed with
the overall park concept plan as recommended in the proposal. Many of their specific
concerns are addressed in the proposal including:
1. WEEDS IN THE POND. They, too, agreed that week harvesting must begin as
soon as possible and agreed that it is a top priority for the pond area as
indicated in the proposal.
2. CONTROL OF POND FRINGE WOODY GROWTH. The association is willing to
offer volunteer services in a supervised and controlled activity of trimming
1111 woody brush from the pond fringe, understanding that a grassy buffer area
around pond will remain to provide a filtering element for pond run-off and to
help prevent pond penetration of trash and litter.
3. SCENIC VISTA AREAS. The membership agreed with the proposal's
recommendation of mowed scenic vista areas.
4. PATHWAY. The membership was unanimously in favor of continuing the
pathway completely around the pond and agrees that it is a top priority.
The membership was in opposition to three elements of the proposal.
1. HARD SURFACE PATHWAY ALONG NORTHSIDE OF POND PATHWAY. The
membership unanimously agreed that a hard surface pathway will deteriorate
the nature aspect of the pond area and invite dangers of fast-moving users on a
walking path and detract wildlife in the pond area.
2. BRIDGE OVER THE NARROWS. The membership questions the need for a
bridge across the narrows, expressing their thoughts that pathway users choose
to walk for exercise and the pond pathway, if continued, is good enough.
• 3. EASEMENT CONNECTION TO LIBRARY. None of the homeowners wishes to
have an easement between the manor homes. It was the opinion of the
membership that when the sidewalk on Long Lake Road is finished, the
connection of the pond path and Long Lake Road sidewalk will provide an
adequate access avenue to the library.
_2-
• - -
4. PARK LIGHTING. The membershipreiterated their desire to have no - =
lighting at
the park. (Lighting is not addressed or recommended in the proposal.)
The membership requested that the City look into two special requests:
1. Spraying for ragweed and Canadian thistles and nettles.
2. The membership would like the City Engineer to check on the outlet flow at
Long Lake Road. It was suggested that perhaps water flow has been hampered.
The membership concluded that they were eager and willing to assist the City with
volunteer services and requested expediency in these matters concerning Silver View
Park.
MS/SL
•
•
1
411 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL `
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR BRAGER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 13, 1990
SUBJECT: FIRE BOND REFERENDUM
On September 12, 1990 I attended a meeting at the Blaine City
Hall at which the Fire Bond Referendum Campaign schedule was
discussed. Attached please find the Fire Bond Referendum
Campaign Schedule, an itemization of the Bond Referendum
Campaign costs, flyers on the referendum which will be
distributed to residents of Blaine, Spring Lake Park and
Mounds View, and mailing to resident, and a flyer regarding
the Fire Department Open House during Fire Prevention Week.
It should be noted that no taxpayer dollars will be spent on
the bond referendum campaign costs. The Fire Department will
pay these costs from donations that they have received.
At the meeting the issue of what might happen if voters said
no to this bond issue was discussed and it was felt that the
mailer might be the appropriate place to expand upon the
consequences of a no vote. There is a section in the mailer
• entitled, "What might happen if we say no to this bond? " . In
that section it states that, " alternate methods of funding
such as leaseback or equipment bonds are more costly and
restrictive. " Perhaps this section might be changed to read,
" a general obligation bond issue was chosen because it is the
least costly method of financing the replacement of fire
stations and the purchase of new pieces of firefighting
apparatus . " If the bond referendum fails more costly
alternative methods of financing such as leaseback or
equipment bonds may have to be used.
These flyers and mailers must be taken to the printer the week
of September 17th, therefore, any modifications should be
submitted to the Fire Department no later than September 18th.
Staff would appreciate Council's direction in this matter.
DFP/MJS
111
BOND REFERENDUM CAMPAIGN SCHEDULE
WEEK OF ACTIVITIES SCHEDULED
9/17 CABLE TV SPOT ANNOUNCEMENTS BEGIN AND CONTINUE
INTERMITTENTLY UP TO ELECTION.
FIRE CREW TRAINED ON DETAILS OF PROGRAM
GIVE ALL FIREFIGHTERS A REFERENCE BOOKLET
9/22 MOUNDS VIEW FESTIVAL IN THE PARK:
PUBLIC FIRE EDUCATION
BOND REFERENDUM/FIRE STATION OPEN HOUSE HANDOUTS
9/24 DOOR-TO-DOOR HANDOUTS IN MOUNDS VIEW:
BOND REFERENDUM AND OPEN HOUSE
ARTICLE IN LOCAL MEDIA
10/1 BLAINE/SPRING LAKE PARK CITY NEWSLETTERS MAILED
BOND REFERENDUM/OPEN HOUSE DATA
• 10/8 FIRE PREVENTION WEEK
CITY BULLETIN BOARDS - OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 14
TALKS TO CIVIC/NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS
10/14 OPEN HOUSE AT ALL STATIONS
FIRE EDUCATION/BOND REFERENDUM
TALKS TO CIVIC/NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS
10/22 CABLE TV/INDEPTH
YARD SIGNS DISTRIBUTED
TALKS TO CIVIC/NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS.
10/29 MAILER TO ALL RESIDENTS
CITY BULLETIN BOARDS - VOTE YES! ! !
TALKS TO CIVIC/NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS
MEDIA ARTICLES
• ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF PROPOSED MAILER
BOND REFERENDUM FLYER
OPEN HOUSE FLYER
BOND REFERENDUM CAMPAIGN COSTS
YARD SIGNS (INCLUDING STAKES) $ 800
MAILER - PRINTING/POSTAGE 5,053
- ART WORK/DESIGN 334
HANDOUTS 950
• CABLE TV 75
SLIDE PRESENTATION FOR TALKS AND OPEN HOUSE
4 MORE SETS @ $50/SET 200
TOTAL $7,412
9/11/90
•
• FIRE DEPARTMENT BOND REFERENDUM
SPRING LAKE PARK-BLAINE-MOUNDS VIEW
NOVEMBER 6, 1990
WE NEED YOUR. H 1 LP
Two of our stations need replacing and six new pieces of apparatus are needed. Old age and
constant use has brought our equipment to its present condition; the average age of the apparatus
to be replaced is 22 years. We also are proposing to add crew quarters at Stations 4 and 5,
participate in a joint training facility with three other fire departments, acquire a
Communications/Command van, and retire the current items in our Capital Improvement Plan.
Station 1, Spring Lake Road and Highway 10, has seen its best day. Because of its deteriorated
condition (doors aren't high enough,inadequate exhaust and floor drainage systems, etc.), it cannot
be remodeled to accommodate new apparatus.
Station 2, with new Highway 610 next to it, will become isolated and impractical for use by a
volunteer fire service.
• Additions to Stations 4 and 5 will provide crew quarters-- a place for the firefighters to relax before
and after calls. At the present time they have to use the apparatus floors which is unhealthy and
contrary to OSHA regulations. The joint training facility will provide us with a tower, burn unit,
drafting pit and flammable liquid spill area; none of these training aids are available to us now.
We are experiencing major repair problems with our present apparatus that will only worsen with
the passage of time. This means trucks out of service, unavailable for calls, and a dramatic increase
in operating costs.
WHAT ARE THE COSTS?
All three cities will be sharing in the cost on the same basis as our yearly fire budget. The total
bond package is $4,450,000.
RESIDENTIAL VALUATION $75,000 $100,000 $125,000
YEARLY COST FOR RESIDENTS
OF SPRING LAKE PARK $10 $16 $25
Please vote YES to help us maintain the first class service we now provide for you and your family.
If you would like more information or want to schedule a presentation for a neighborhood or club
group, please call the Fire Department office at 786-4436.
• *****
•
•
FIRE DEPARTMENT BOND REFERENDUM
SPRING LAKE PARK-BLAINE-MOUNDS VIEW
NOVEMBER 6, 1990
WE NEED YOUR HELP
Two of our stations need replacing and six new pieces of apparatus are needed. Old age and
constant use has brought our equipment to its present condition; the average age of the apparatus
to be replaced is 22 years. We also are proposing to add crew quarters at Stations 4 and 5,
participate in a joint training facility with three other fire departments, acquire a
Communications/Command van, and retire the current items in our Capital Improvement Plan.
Station 1, Spring Lake Road and Highway 10, has seen its best day. Because of its deteriorated
condition (doors aren't high enough, inadequate exhaust and floor drainage systems, etc.),it cannot
be remodeled to accommodate new apparatus.
Station 2, with new Highway 610 next to it, will become isolated and impractical for use by a
volunteer fire service.
• Additions to Stations 4 and 5 will provide crew quarters —a place for the firefighters to relax before
and after calls. At the present time they have to use the apparatus floors which is unhealthy and
contrary to OSHA regulations. The joint training facility will provide us with a tower, burn unit,
drafting pit and flammable liquid spill area; none of these training aids are available to us now.
We are experiencing major repair problems with our present apparatus that will only worsen with
the passage of time. This means trucks out of service,unavailable for calls, and a dramatic increase
in operating costs.
WHAT ARE THE COSTS?
All three cities will be sharing in the cost on the same basis as our yearly fire budget. The total
bond package is $4,450,000.
RESIDENTIAL VALUATION $75,000 $100,000 $125,000
YEARLY COST FOR RESIDENTS
OF BLAINE $13 $20 $32
Please vote YES to help us maintain the first class service we now provide for you and your family.
If you would like more information or want to schedule a presentation for a neighborhood or club
group, please call the Fire Department office at 786-4436.
. *****
• FIRE DEPARTMENT BOND REFERENDUM
SPRING LAKE PARK-BLAINE-MOUNDS VIEW
NOVEMBER 6, 1990
WE NEED YOUR HELP
Two of our stations need replacing and six new pieces of apparatus are needed. Old age and
constant use has brought our equipment to its present condition; the average age of the apparatus
to be replaced is 22 years. We also are proposing to add crew quarters at Stations 4 and 5,
participate in a joint training facility with three other fire departments, acquire a
Communications/Command van, and retire the current items in our Capital Improvement Plan.
Station 1, Spring Lake Road and Highway 10, has seen its best day. Because of its deteriorated
condition (doors aren't high enough,inadequate exhaust and floor drainage systems, etc.),it cannot
be remodeled to accommodate new apparatus.
Station 2, with new Highway 610 next to it, will become isolated and impractical for use by a
volunteer fire service.
• Additions to Stations 4 and 5 will provide crew quarters —a place for the firefighters to relax before
and after calls. At the present time they have to use the apparatus floors which is unhealthy and
contrary to OSHA regulations. The joint training facility will provide us with a tower, burn unit,
drafting pit and flammable liquid spill area; none of these training aids are available to us now.
We are experiencing major repair problems with our present apparatus that will only worsen with
the passage of time. This means trucks out of service, unavailable for calls, and a dramatic increase
in operating costs.
WHAT ARE THE COSTS?
-e c't.-s w' be sharing in the cost on the same basis as our earl fire bud•et. The total
bond package is $4,450,000.
RESIDENTIAL VALUATION $75,000 $100,000 $125,000
YEARLY COST FOR RESIDENTS
OF MOUNDS VIEW $12 $18 $29
Please vote YES to help us maintain the first class service we now provide for you and your family.
• If you would like more information or want to schedule a presentation for a neighborhood or club
group, please call the Fire Department office at 786-4436.
. *****
(side one)
(SBM FD logo here)
•
•
(mailing indicia)
THE SPRING LAKE PARK-BLAINE-MOUNDS VIEW FIREFIGHTERS NEED YOUR HELP
BOND REFERENDUM INFORMATION
VOTE ! YES ! - NOVEMBER 6, 1990 - VOTE ! YES !
SFACTS AND FIGURES
* Fire Station No. 1 , Spring Lake Road & Highway 10, was built in
1944 and is no longer adequate to meet current and future needs.
Because of its age and condition, it cannot be remodeled to house
modern apparatus.
* Residents and businesses served by Fire Station No. 2, adjacent to
Blaine City Hall, will be cut off from the station when new Highway
610 is completed. The freeway will make the station virtually
inaccessible for our volunteers.
* First-responding apparatus at Stations 1 , 3 and 4 average 22 years
in age and are due for replacement. The apparatus is wearing out -
costly to maintain.
* Rapid residential and commercial growth of our three cities means
equipment and facilities must be upgraded to provide adequate fire •
protection service. We do not have any type of training facility
but must use city streets and private buildings to drill on.
* No crew quarters at Stations 4 and 5 and no training tower and
related facilities.
•
(side two)
WHAT IS NEEDED?
* To construct a new Fire Station No. 1 at 1810 Highway 10. This
station will also house Administrative offices and will replace the
existing station at that site.
* To construct a new Fire Station No. 2 on 89th Ave. This station
will replace the existing station adjacent to Blaine City Hall.
* To acquire three new pumper fire trucks to replace aging apparatus
at Stations 1 , 3 and 4.
* To acquire a new aerial ladder truck for Station No. 1 and a new
aerial platform truck for Station No. 3. These will replace the
existing ladder trucks which are no longer adequate to serve the
needs of our community. Both units have been in service for 20 or
more years.
* To acquire a Communications/Command Van.
* To upgrade existing Stations 4 and 5 with crew quarters and
physical fitness rooms to encourage a higher level of participation
by our current crew and to help in recruiting new firefighters.
* To participate with three other fire departments in a joint
training facility to allow us to drill under safe conditions, not
in the street or on private buildings.
WHAT IS THE COST? The total Bond Package is $4,450,000.
All three cities will be sharing in the cost on the
same basis as our yearly fire budget.
WHAT WILL IT COST ME?
RESIDENTIAL VALUATION: $75,000 $100,000 $125,000
YEARLY COST FOR RESIDENTS
OF SPRING LAKE PARK: $10 $16 $25
WHO WILL BENEFIT FROM THIS BOND?
ALL residents and property owners will benefit because:
* Excellent fire rating will be maintained, thus keeping homeowner
insurance costs down.
* Equipment will be updated to meet growth of the three cities.
* Bond will meet anticipated needs for next 10 years.
* Maintenance costs will be reduced.
_ - . _ . re acne• wi
up-to-date equipment and facilities.
WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN IF WE SAY NO TO THIS BOND?
* Alternate methods of funding such as lease-back or equipment bonds
•
are more costly and restrictive.
* Another bond referendum soon with increased costs.
* Increasing maintenance costs and downtime on equipment could
seriously affect emergency response.
* Increased insurance rates if losses increase.
* Increased risk to life and property.
WHERE DO I VOTE? See your city newsletter or call city hall for
information on the nearest polling place.
FOR MORE INFORMATION CALL: Fire Department Headquarters at 786-4436
for detailed information or to schedule a
presentation for your group.
(side one)
(SBM FD logo here)
S
•
(mailing indicia)
THE SPRING LAKE PARK—BLAINE—MOUNDS VIEW FIREFIGHTERS NEED YOUR HELP
BOND REFERENDUM INFORMATION
VOTE ! YES ! — NOVEMBER 6, 1990 — VOTE ! YES !
• FACTS AND FIGURES
* Fire Station No. 1, Spring Lake Road & Highway 10, was built in
1944 and is no longer adequate to meet current and future needs.
Because of its age and condition, it cannot be remodeled to house
modern apparatus.
* Residents and businesses served by Fire Station No. 2, adjacent to
Blaine City Hall, will be cut off from the station when new Highway
610 is completed. The freeway will make the station virtually
inaccessible for our volunteers.
* First-responding apparatus at Stations 1 , 3 and 4 average 22 years
in age and are due for replacement. The apparatus is wearing out -
costly to maintain.
* Rapid residential and commercial growth of our three cities means
equipment and facilities must be upgraded to provide adequate fire
protection service. We do not have any type of training facility
but must use city streets and private buildings to drill on.
* No crew quarters at Stations 4 and 5 and no training tower and
related facilities.
(side two)
WHAT IS NEEDED?
* To construct a new Fire Station No. 1 at 1810 Highway 10. This .
station will also house Administrative offices and will replace the
existing station at that site.
* To construct a new Fire Station No. 2 on 89th Ave. This .station
will replace the existing station adjacent to Blaine City Hall.
* To acquire three new pumper fire trucks to replace aging apparatus
at Stations 1 , 3 and 4.
* To acquire a new aerial ladder truck for Station No. 1 and a new
aerial platform truck for Station No. 3. These will replace the
existing ladder trucks which are no longer adequate to serve the
needs of our community. Both units have been in service for 20 or
more years.
* To acquire a Communications/Command Van.
* To upgrade existing Stations 4 and 5 with crew quarters and
physical fitness rooms to encourage a higher level of participation
by our current crew and to help in recruiting new firefighters.
* To participate with three other fire departments in a joint
training facility to allow us to drill under safe conditions, not
in the street or on private buildings.
WHAT IS THE COST? The total Bond Package is $4,450,000.
All three cities will be sharing in the cost on the
same basis as our yearly fire budget.
WHAT WILL IT COST ME?
RESIDENTIAL VALUATION: $75,000 $100,000 $125,000 •
YEARLY COST FOR RESIDENTS
OF BLAINE: $13 $20 $32
WHO WILL BENEFIT FROM THIS BOND?
ALL residents and property owners will benefit because:
* Excellent fire rating will be maintained, thus keeping homeowner
insurance costs down.
* Equipment will be updated to meet growth of the three cities.
* Bond will meet anticipated needs for next 10 years.
* Maintenance costs will be reduced.
* Additional volunteers will be attracted and retained with
up-to-date equipment and facilities.
WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN IF WE SAY NO TO THIS BOND?
* Alternate methods of funding such as lease-back or equipment bonds
are more costly and restrictive.
* Another bond referendum soon with increased costs.
* Increasing maintenance costs and downtime on equipment could
seriously affect emergency response.
* Increased insurance rates if losses increase.
* Increased risk to life and property.
•
WHERE DO I VOTE? See your city newsletter or call city hall for
information on the nearest polling place.
FOR MORE INFORMATION CALL: Fire Department Headquarters at 786-4436
for detailed information or to schedule a
presentation for your group.
(side one)
(SBM FD logo here)
•
(mailing indicia)
THE SPRING LAKE PARK—BLAINS—MOUNDS VIEW FIREFIGHTERS NEED YOUR HELP
BOND REFERENDUM INFORMATION
VOTE ! YES ! — NOVEMBER 6, 1990 — VOTE ! YES !
• FACTS AND FIGURES
* Fire Station No. 1 , Spring Lake Road & Highway 10, was built in
1944 and is no longer adequate to meet current and future needs.
Because of its age and condition, it cannot be remodeled to house
modern apparatus.
* Residents and businesses served by Fire Station No. 2, adjacent to
Blaine City Hall, will be cut off from the station when new Highway
610 is completed. The freeway will make the station virtually
inaccessible for our volunteers.
* First-responding apparatus at Stations 1 , 3 and 4 average 22 years
in age and are due for replacement. The apparatus is wearing out -
costly to maintain.
* Rapid residential and commercial growth of our three cities means
equipment and facilities must be upgraded to provide adequate fire
protection service. We do not have any type of training facility
but must use city streets and private buildings to drill on.
* No crew quarters at Stations 4 and 5 and no training tower and
related facilities.
(side two)
WHAT IS NEEDED?
* To construct a new Fire Station No. 1 at 1810 Highway 10. This •
station will also house Administrative offices and will replace the
existing station at that site.
* To construct a new Fire Station No. 2 on 89th Ave. This station
will replace the existing station adjacent to Blaine City Hall.
* To acquire three new pumper fire trucks to replace aging apparatus
at Stations 1 , 3 and 4.
* To acquire a new aerial ladder truck for Station No. 1 and a new
aerial platform truck for Station No. 3. These will replace the
existing ladder trucks which are no longer adequate to serve the
needs of our community. Both units have been in service for 20 or
more years.
* To acquire a Communications/Command Van.
* To upgrade existing Stations 4 and 5 with crew quarters and
physical fitness rooms to encourage a higher level of participation
by our current crew and to help in recruiting new firefighters.
* To participate with three other fire departments in a joint
training facility to allow us to drill under safe conditions, not
in the street or on private buildings.
WHAT IS THE COST? The total Bond Package is $4,450,000.
All three cities will be sharing in the cost on the
same basis as our yearly fire budget.
WHAT WILL IT COST ME?
RESIDENTIAL VALUATION: $75,000 $100,000 $125,000 •
YEARLY COST FOR RESIDENTS
OF MOUNDS VIEW: $12 $18 $29
WHO WILL BENEFIT FROM THIS BOND?
ALL residents and property owners will benefit because:
* Excellent fire rating will be maintained, thus keeping homeowner
insurance costs down.
* Equipment will be updated to meet growth of the three cities.
* Bond will meet anticipated needs for next 10 years.
* Maintenance costs will be reduced.
* Additional volunteers will be attracted and retained with
up-to-date equipment and facilities.
WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN IF WE SAY NO TO THIS BOND?
* Alternate methods of funding such as lease-back or equipment bonds
are more costly and restrictive.
* Another bond referendum soon with increased costs.
* Increasing maintenance costs and downtime on equipment could
seriously affect emergency response.
* Increased insurance rates if losses increase.
* Increased risk to life and property. •
WHERE DO I VOTE? See your city newsletter or call city hall for
information on the nearest polling place.
FOR MORE INFORMATION CALL: Fire Department Headquarters at 786-4436
for detailed information or to schedule a
presentation for your group.
•
FIRE DEPARTMENT OPEN HOUSE
FAMILY EVENT
SUNDAY - OCTOBER 14 - NOON TO 4 P.M.
THE SPRING LAKE PARK - BLAINE - MOUNDS VIEW FIRE DEPARTMENT
WILL HOLD AN OPEN HOUSE AT ALL FIVE OF THEIR STATIONS TO
COMMEMORATE FIRE PREVENTION WEEK. WE INVITE YOU TO:
* STOP BY TO MEET YOUR FIREFIGHTERS.
• * VIEW FIRE PREVENTION DISPLAYS , APPARATUS AND
EQUIPMENT.
* HAVE YOUR BOND REFERENDUM QUESTIONS ANSWERED.
OUR STATION LOCATIONS ARE:
STATION 1 - 1810 HIGHWAY 10 (AT SPRING LAKE ROAD)
STATION 2 - 9150 CENTRAL AVENUE N. E.
STATION 3 - 1314 - 109TH AVENUE AT BUCHANAN STREET
STATION 4 - 10290 LEVER STREET
STATION 5 - 1200 PAUL PARKWAY
REFRESHMENTS! ! ! DOOR PRIZES! ! !
•
9/4/90
MEMORANDUM
Memo To: Mayor and Council Members
From Ric Minetor, City Engineer/Director of Public Works
Date September 20, 1990
Subject: Bid Award Concurrence for County Road J
Reconstruction - TH 65 to I-35W
(Except Knollwood to Xylite)
Ramsey County has received bids on this project; Forest Lake
Contracting was the low bidder at $1,027,236.66. This was lower
than the estimated cost. I have reviewed the information
submitted by Ramsey County and concur with their selection of
Forest Lake Contracting. The County desires a formal concurrence
from the City. Our share of the project is estimated to be
$33 ,924.56. A payment of $31,624.59 will be due from the City to
Ramsey County at the time of the actual contract award.
I recommend that staff be authorized to send a letter of
concurrence to Ramsey County; and further that Council approve of
the initial payment of $31,624.59 to Ramsey County for our share
of the cost.
111 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR BRAGER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 13, 1990
SUBJECT: HIGHWAY 10 DEVELOPMENT MORATORIUM
After the September 10, 1990 Council Meeting, Councilmember
Blanchard requested that I review the resolution extending the
Highway 10 Development Moratorium as it was her recollection
that the moratorium would soon be ending. Attached for your
review is Ordinance No. 466, An Interim Ordinance Amending the
Mounds View City Code Establishing Development Restrictions
Along State Highway 10 from County Road I to the Western
Border of the City. Section VII states that the ordinance
shall remain effective for one year from the date of its
enactment. The ordinance was enacted on April 24, 1989 and
was to expire on April 24, 1990 . On April 23, 1990 Resolution
No. 3033, A Resolution Extending Interim Ordinance No. 466
Regarding A Moratorium On Development In A Designated Area
Along Highway 10 In The City of Mounds View was adopted.
This resolution extended the effective date of interim
ordinanace No. 466 from one year to 18 months . As a
• consequence of this resolution, the ordinance will expire on
or about October 24, 1990.
DB/mjs
111
Ilk RESOLUTION NO. 3033
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION EXTENDING INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 466 REGARDING
A' MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT IN A DESIGNATED AREA ALONG
HIGHWAY 10 IN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View passed an Interim
Ordinance pursuant to M.S.S. 462 .355 establishing a one year
moratorium on development in a designated district within the
City to commence April 24, 1989 and end April 24, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the primary purpose of the Interim Ordinance
was to allow the City sufficient time to complete its planning
process and determine what changes, if any, need be made to
its comprehensive plan concerning said district; and
WHEREAS, the City needs additional time to complete its
planning process .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the effective date
111 of Interim Ordinance No. 466 is hereby extended from one year
to eighteen months from the date April 24, 1989 pursuant, to
M.S.S. 462 .355, Subd. (4) to allow the City to complete its
planning process .
Adopted this 23rd day of April, 1990 .
ATTEST:
Ma ,or
Ale(SEAL)
/40
Cler' A• "inistr-tor
•}
l
ORDINANCE NO. 466
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY CODE
ESTABLISHING DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS ALONG STATE HIGHWAY 10
FROM COUNTY ROAD I TO THE WESTERN BORDER OF THE CITY
The City Council of the City of Mounds View does
hereby ordain:
SECTION I. Legislative Finding of Fact. The City
of Mounds View has experienced rapid commercial and
industrial development along Minnesota Trunk Highway 10 in
recent years. The City of Mounds View is particularly
concerned with development along Highway 10 between the •
intersections of County Road I and the western border of the
City at the intersection of Highway 10. To deal with future
development concerns, the City of Mounds View wishes to
study, and if necessary implement, changes to its
comprehensive plan to provide for the orderly development of
land in and around Minnesota Trunk Highway 10. The City
finds it to be in its best interests to take reasonable
measures for a reasonable interim period of time to protect
the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of
0 its citizens until appropriate changes to its comprehensive
plan can become effective. The City finds that unless
reasonable measures are taken for a reasonable interim
period to protect the public interests by preserving the
integrity of the existing commercial and industrial areas
while changes to the comprehensive plan are studied, the
existing zoning ordinances and other land use regulations
will destroy the integrity of the comprehensive development
plan and its basic purposes and effects.
SECTION II . Legislative Intent. It is the intent of
the City Council to protect the planning process, its
_ _ _ -
plan by hereby adopting, pursuant to authority vested in the
City by Minnesota Statutes §462. 355, Subd. 4, reasonable
interim regulations for a reasonable period of time to allow
for the preparation and consideration of changes to the
City' s comprehensive plan to protect the public health,
safety and welfare and to prevent the continuation of a
pattern of land use and development which would be
inconsistent with the plan.
SECTION III . Affect Areas: Supercedes. This
ordinance shall only apply to and govern the commercial and
industrial districts of the City of Mounds View indicated on
111, the Interim Ordinance District Map, attached hereto and
hereby made part of this ordinance, during the period from
which this ordinance is in effect. This ordinance, during
ORDINANCE NO. 466
PAGE TWO
its effective period, shall replace and supercede provisions
of all other ordinances and regulations applicable to the
City of Mounds View which are in conflict or are
inconsistent with the provisions herein. All ordinances and
provisions therein which are not in conflict with the terms
and conditions of this ordinance shall continue in full
force and effect.
Section IV. Scope of Control. Except as herein-
after provided in this ordinance, during the period
following the effective date of this ordinance:
(a) Neither the Planning Commission of the City
nor the City Council shall grant any
preliminary approval to a subdivision plat,
site plan or other development map or
application, regardless of the fact that such
subdivision plat, site plan or other
development map or application has been
submitted prior to the effective date of this
ordinance, for any subdivision or development
lying wholly or partially within the Interim
Ordinance District.
For the purpose of this regulation, a subdivision shall be
III_i defined as the division of an area, parcel, tract of land
into two (2 ) or more lots, tracts or parcels, for the
purpose of transferring ownership or establishing a building
site.
(b) No building or structure shall be constructed
or erected, nor shall any building or zoning
permit be issued by the City of Mounds View for
the construction or erection of any building or
structure on any lot or lots or property lying
wholly or partially within the Interim
Ordinance District.
Section V. Exceptions. This ordinance shall not
apply to the issuance of any building or zoning permits by
the City of Mounds View in the following instances, provided
that the application meets all other applicable laws, rules,
regulations and ordinances governing and applicable to the
effective areas :
(a) To perform work relating to the repair and/or ,
maintenance of any unlawful use of land
existing on the date of adoption of this
ordinance, or to make any existing building or
structure conform or comply with any other
applicable laws, rules or regulations .
i
41, ORDINANCE NO. 466
PAGE THREE
(b) To perform work necessary to preserve health,
safety, life or property in the case of an
emergency.
(c) Work performed by any public agency or its
contractor .
SECTION VI. Appeal Provisions. The City Council
shall have the power to vary or modify the application of
any provisions of this ordinance upon its determination in
its absolute legislative discretion that such variance or
modification is necessary to alleviate an undue hardwhip,
and will not effect the integrity of the comprehensive plan,
the City' s planning or zoning ordinance, or the Interim -
Ordinance District, and is consistent with the letter and
intent of this ordinance and not the health, safety and
general welfare of the City. Upon receiving any application
for such variance or modification of this ordinance, the
City Council shall refer such application to the Planning
Commission with respect to the effect of the prospective
variance of modification of the planning process and
comprehensive plan. Such report shall be returned by the
Ilk Planning Commission to the City Council within sixty (60)
days following such reference and shall be placed upon the
next agenda of the City Council .
SECTION VII. Length of Time. This ordinance shall
remain effective for one year from the date of its enactment
or until such time as said ordinance shall be revoked or
otherwise amended.
SECTION VIII . Penalties. Any person, firm, entity
or corporation who violates any provisions of this ordinance
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor as defined by state law.
SECTION IX. Validity. The validity of any word,
sentence, section, clause, paragraph, part or provision of
this ordinance shall not affect the validity of any other
part of this ordinance which can be given effect without
such invalid part or parts .
SECTION X. This ordinance shall take effect thirty
days after the date of its publication.
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on
this 10 of Apri 1 , 1989.
• ORDINANCE NO. 466
PAGE FOUR
Read and passed by the City Council of the City of
Mounds View this 24 day of April , 1989.
ATTEST: Mayor
(SEAL) _ •-�� %
lerk-Ad inistr=tor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
I - 53`0 : 836' 8359 , 83601 r 854,5 8344 8351 185* "m, • 8340` 8331 F. 8330. 5555 4:14.2..;4:14.2..; 8357 E
83. 8347• 23 8325
Y
8330 0.....7.18340 A-5 B, F; x343 8341 8316 8311 8313 8320 0 831s 8318 8323 • • I8
8 a �� 85541 8339 . 8334 8335 a532135e.8315 r 83— • . 8310 claws 8310• 5321 •• ' :
y' 83' - !!!!�! 8325 8380 o 8333 8330'• 8333 • 4 63o3 • 8290` 8295. • _ 8290k x 8291 . • 8290 8283 7 8:
' :. :t..20- 8323 8316 . :8315 • 8322:0 8321 • ' .�83I9 - : 82!15 8280. 8287 . ' 8280 8281 8280 8,
8319 Pit 3508 c gat[ rag
• -• .1 .. 8275 • 8270 8281 H270 0.8271 8270
'J - •• 831 ; • 'Crovelanfa
H29T =5265 • 5265 .5273 • 8260,5 8261 8260
f ': .1c • 8305. 8t?8 J 830f , v _
t - 82-*. 8289 , o gz85 :} Parr^'. 8255 = 8250 ' 8267 8250 i 8251 8250 8255 8�
t 8281 `8250 Y 8261 ti Fps.. PF�ie� J ` a * o' • •8261 8 4O a in g 1` , zi 8241• EC.
s_.,
}� 82 • o1M v K.1 4 it n n rte. . t0 50
r 8265 ` d25o 8241 g RI N N N H - '•• 8233 ' f • 'N N .N,N 8231 8.
��.`i�- AR.AN A AROAN
•
v .p
a °W 8z55 . 82 • :MOS 1,0 . , ...
�l--�� ,t,..
N. N N 0 : - _ . c. . 8205 i
L T' if=
8z2S -� 8227 . . . 8f .,::•. -- . •8184 8193 •- •
•
�' ���. .r sus • SZIZ81988205 ®®I r � �}�� 8192 O R I V -
4•- C ay : ., .� 8203 N A' • :i_� MIIIII ir
1 - -czo
5160 H omi.ii41 : + . 8163
' L OR .1 8150
k..1., - 8145 ..
-214k .1;1:0)liig ` 8138 N 814. 8135 • �� 8141
•
.� 7�• 8t32 _8127 -. 8125 �'J
A li,, 88106 z 21c4 Ft ri Nrnni 1e- MR - • 5111,
$ M RW00 -0A•
. B-3 emu 0 �+ N Boal •5oea 5075 •T 5059 I
- - 3 J N N •• K 8O • 8071 . N$oC•(o 5071 8066 8071 • B•
1 �� 8060> .5075 W,..' Boss Soso - 8055 8060 8065 • 8
. _ - ,f- iiri ,eo40¢8045 8046 8045 5042 8045 8062. Boss 8
.. . . . iyi ►•, �=�• I 5 5039 8032 0 8033 8040 0 8035 8
. - 4 8020 8025 �� 8015 802 W 5018 4 0 8021 8
8016 5016 80,5 0 8011 8000 m 8
- 0 . • :.•• 8005 5= 8009 800f
a
4 0005 ... . ��. I 7981 7990 7981: 7990 7989 7
0 " -
• 4 -:. 7975 7979 14
7980 0 7969 7980 p 7979 7
• • • 18-3 7965 �5 7159 7970 > 79(.5 3 7969• T
`._ :.•- _. •2 79,}9 • 7934 2 7959 7966 a 7
. � • - \ . iii r211:
� » 7945 7946 W 792?° 7
79 7935 7930 7917
• • < .� m ,e.
1' �- �� '7901 ' 1 •.i 17900 7901 N N
U . . .
• 7911 �L' a-3 MILLVIEW ROAD
.I VI W ROA• � S m �^
rys 7887 IIIUCr
A al
�a 7i 7886 7891 N N : ';
7827825p78794 - • 7876 78837886
II- 7810 01 7870 • 7865 �� 0, I 1%. fy 7870 7877 7834 7851
.. d =•Af-�+ T86O 2851 ii,C+J '8211-0. ..
11 .1.0' f 7863 7842- T�1 7
• ill —� ----/-77—' 7
_• 7850 z 7841 • L� —. ��O 7851
- - ! gig
• .....III __•/_13�•:• iio.- -1 �w�A. _ A 7120 -
r•�1i�10"min gram . sl ..=
p, 3r• -7 °
iii
I. l pring - . R-3 , ',1• • 7x61
• • . )i'ill 7788 1120.01564E1- _mia 801 • '1' , b
7755
11
Luke ;i i11z�=����.�� 5 M. B- �� 7745
--�
fY�l x iiii�YiN 7 j 11 If•••
�� COUNTY• ROAD I
m 702. \ Z E
�`.�-..��—' %i�P 7686 7685 i 7692 7666 71.90 act•4
___ r
.f^7580 7669 1 7670 7663 71•62 14, • 111116,
ioN Q •, 9 7675 I M I—767+0 7665 7660 l,
PI „� Q • 7653lik 9G
I71660 2655! 7666 7647 • 7644 R-2 , ,Q • 6�'0 4'f-
i tz •
� 7630 7633 7664, 7629 7635 1.4
4
i' 1 7624 7629 7620 7625 7620 a whet Yew -
c 7611 7614 a 7606 7619 76001 IT601 o a
�c NB-2
7604 °z Z 7585 7594!r 75 ¢ ParX °=
IW 7581 7584 7581 7580 0 7579 758812 la n�.� (
W
ir`7555 7564 1 T55 - C 7565 7584tH 7565 a Zit 2A . 5114'
7664 I 7556 O 7555 75721z O a r0°' N!-N
1NI754S
7346.'117545 1 75501LJ17545 7S60
1,4 7555 R-2 PF �'
•
�..
r # `
411 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR BRAGER `w
DATE: SEPTEMBER 13, 1990
SUBJECT: HIGHWAY 610
Per direction from the Mayor this item has been placed on the
Agenda Session agenda for further discussion. Attached please
find a copy of Resolution No. 3024 for your review.
DB/MJS
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 3024
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING NEW HIGHWAY 10/610 AND
REALIGNING COUNTY ROAD J
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) has proposed the completion of the New Highway 10/610
project, State Project Number S . P. 0214-06 (T.H. 10) , and the
realignment of County Road J on the north end of the City of
Mounds View; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View has been aware of and
addressed the matter on several occasions since the mid-
1970 's, but at no time has any previous City Council taken
formal action to approve or disapprove specific design plans;
and
• WHEREAS, on January 8, 1990 the City of Mounds View
hosted an informational meeting at the request of MnDOT, which
MnDOT publicized, for the purpose of informing residents of
the MnDOT plans ; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the informational meeting
residents in the area affected by the proposed project urged
the City Council to become involved and sponsor meetings to
allow for community-wide discussion and input; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a Town Meeting on
March 8, 1990 to review the proposed project and alternative
designs which had been developed at a previous public meeting
and to develop a consensus of the over 200 residents in
attendance for one of the alternatives; and
WHEREAS, the Town Meeting did show that the residents
in attendance did support access to the north; and
WHEREAS, since no clear consensus resulted from the
Town Meeting, the City Council held further discussions with
representatives of the streets in the area to attempt to reach
a consensus on the most desireable design alternative; and
WHEREAS, these discussions resulted in the development
• of the following goals,
Insure health, safety and welfare of residents .
111
RESOLUTION NO. 3024
PAGE TWO
Not promote access/expansion of airport.
Equality of traffic dispersal -- everyone take a
share.
Preserve character of neighborhoods - no more
physical barriers .
• Do not encourage transient traffic flow by design.
▪ Provide for access to the north and south.
• Willingness to compromise; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has heard several hours of
testimony, received hundreds of phone calls and personal
contacts from interested residents, received numerous letters
and the following petitions,
Petition from Red Oak Drive residents opposing
Red Oak Drive becoming a feeder or through street •
to County Road J. Received February 15, 1990
Petition from Fairchild Avenue residents
requesting that Groveland Road be connected to
realigned County Road J. Received March 19, 1990
• Petition requesting that no alternative to MnDOT
plan be approved unless a traffic study is
performed in advance. Received March 19 , 1990
▪ Petition requesting that the City Council approve
the plan designated as Alternate 3/6 modified.
- -• . . . 1 ;
WHEREAS , Councilmember Quick and Mayor Hankner
conducted an informal survey of area residents to obtain their
views on the issue and the results have been tabulated and
provided to each Councilmember; and
WHEREAS, on March 21, 1990 the Mounds View Planning
Commission adopted the following prioritized goals with
respect to the project,
Priority A:
Provides for the safety of the neighborhood.
411
110
RESOLUTION NO. 3024
PAGE THREE
Maintain single family residential character of
the northern end of the City.
Priority B:
Limit access to and from the northern end of the
City.
Strategically locate access points .
Minimize impact while maximizing convenience to
Mounds View residents .
Preserve existing traffic patterns as much as
possible.
Priority C:
Minimize negative environmental impacts; and
• WHEREAS, the Mounds View Parks and Recreation
Commission on March 22, 1990 adopted Resolution No. 1990-1
which requests that the City Council select and alternate
design which would include access points east of Knollwood
Drive with the intent of dispersing traffic, allows the least
amount of traffic impact on Groveland Park, and allows an
access point or points to County Road J east of Knollwood
Drive and west of Red Oak Drive.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of
the City of Mounds View after taking into consideration the
preponderance of information of the issue approves Layout
Number 13 as modified by Alternate 3/6 modified. The
extension of Airport Road as identified in Alternate 3/6
modified shall be contingent upon the following,
1 . Completion of a traffic study within 90 days . Upon
completion of the traffic study and during 1990, the
Council shall determine the feasibility of constructing
Airport Road extension and establish standards which
will dictate the future status of Airport Road extension,
if constructed.
2 . Alignment of Airport Road 3 degrees to the West as shown
in drawings dated April 9, 1990 provided by MnDOT.
• 3 . Completion of an intergovernmental agreement between the
Cities of Blaine and Mounds View which will provide the
following,
•
RESOLUTION NO. 3024
PAGE FOUR
▪ The City of Mounds View will maintain the
extension.
▪ The City of Mounds View will have sole authority
to establish traffic controls including, but not
limited to, speed limits, traffic signs , and
prohibition of truck traffic .
• The City of Mounds View will have sole authority
to determine the future status of the Airport Road
extension including its closing.
4 . Receipt of a letter from MnDOT Commissioner Levine
accepting and agreeing to the Conditions of this
Resolution and, if the Airport Road extension is not
built during project construction, agreeing to reserve
adequate funds for the future construction of the
Airport Road extension as determined by the City of
Mounds View no later than 1996 .
411
Adopted this 9th day of April, 1990 .
ATTEST:
Mayo,
(SEAL) . .�i� le
Cler' inistr.tor
•
iMEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1990
SUBJECT: ESTIMATE OF COST TO LIGHT CITY HALL
WEST SOFTBALL FIELD
As requested by Councilmember Quick, I have received an estimate for lighting City
Hall west softball field. A number of years ago Musco Lighting, Inc. provided the City
with an estimate of about $50,000 for lighting both City Hall fields.
The cost estimate today for lighting the single field is $39,000. Musco is a reputable
sports lighting company in the State of Minnesota. Many metro facilities have
installed Musco lighting. The lighting is specific and offers excellent playing light.
The fixtures and poles are of the highest quality. Musco Lighting recently installed
lighting at the New Brighton Freedom Park softball field located on Silver Lake road
and the Mounds view High School football field.
• Staff believes that lighting the west field, allowing for four games per night, would
benefit the City for these reasons:
1. One softball field generates parking needs of approximately 54 cars during peak
game turnover times from 6:30 - 7:30 p.m. This is the same time that parking
is needed for Council meetings. Having four games on one field would spread
out the parking needs throughout the evening.
2. The vacated field space could provide new opportunities for facilities such as
additional parking, tennis courts, green space or other.
3. Playing four games per night on one field versus playing four games per night
on two fields would save maintenance time and costs of field preparation.
Also, future expenses such as turf control and sprinkling would be less for one field
versus two fields servicing the same number of teams.
One final note is that the east softball field will most likely be dug up when well
number 1 is moved.
If you wish me to provide the Council with additional information regarding softball
• field lighting, please call me at ext. #20.
MS/SL
• Craig Gallop -
Sports Technology,Inc.
P.O.Box 27231
Golden Valley,MN 55427
612/533-2030
September 10, 1990
Mary Sarrion
Park and Recreation Director
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Re : Lighting of City Hall Softball Field.
Dear Mary,
The following information is provided to light the softball field
at City' Hall Park. We propose to light the facility to 30 footcandles
infield and 20 footcandles outfield using the Musco Sportscluster-2
lighting system. This will provide you with excellent lighting that
• will be maintenance-free throughout the years . The poles would
be galvanized steel which would also be maintenance-free .
The Sportscluster-2 lighting system uses new technology in control
of light both on and off of the field . By redirecting potential
spill light back onto the playing field, the system effectively
reduces spill and glare light while increasing field light by
25% per fixture. The Sportscluster-2 will reduce the glare light on
Highway 10 andwill reduce the glare light from the eyes of the
ball players .
Installation shall include the following- . $39,000.00.
1 . Provide galvanized steel poles .
2 . Provide Musco Sportscluster-2 lighting system.
3 . Provide underground electrical system.
4. Mount lighting to poles and set poles .
5 . Install complete lighting system and electrical system.
6 . 5 year warranty on lighting system.
7. 15 year warranty on poles .
Please feel free to call if you have any questions .
p�TTLE
Sw O S ' cerel
ifirCraig Gal op
CO N,w Independent Representative for:
/ 0000
ILL Gj
Official Supplier of Lighting MUSC0
Unitingd$gest"' to the 1990 Goodwill Games LIGHTING, INC.
,.z'a•�' .l� „„Y-��-;,:, � 1�-' - _1 . = ;x•'ys4'^�p,,.c..t'' -y. .i,,,✓ -. - S K`-•-�. Zs_L'7�,.i.•• M..�_ s !,.- -ti .B
a.0r5ms "4 kY,,. CI F
.
-
.7
.Set4 x y *' y4 o- s.s .-ix-^ -* -77.f. .77,0,..."-',4,7.., �as•.rr ✓^, ' "�� *•..-• ""Y•, r K r2H * ,-..'..„.',-"•".•:-. 1; ;T'a"ryA•c --1 .,i4."4,*,.._, .: hti 's t - iraZ- 1�-,:".-,:,,,,t,"2-. ., m.. y*Y ,K" rf Rte'%2"'.vy,...,,...1-.4,,,:•;,,,7,_.,•-::-,, ,---.1--:,',..,-'t•.-.,,'
- ,prN,'T^'-" :�.j i �tn:e.yXu f 7.1.,::4.'.._ , rLi� _a -7-',6.1 „ -_..•S.to,�ch ' "�e •, ,k7 �� -yxfis1vY 7 .3.-1'..`',:,,,>,„`,;'::::;;I:0-.yrvw < r ! "er! , •`•�4.•'tet•( T -i ' �" g � \^7 tid. M+>a .L-a.-N-' s ,7 _ ! '.K4.sey2ai . > •.a .
6.4x,Mfi . l •u c' `�+!t:-„a-: ,,!„..,2-!.-_..:
4 e ,,-
:-..
•
•
i.
a3„� ;• ""• 4 .. �_.:. r ---,. ic =?� -r1er . x --:: 7
-A�Fa+".•••-3:s- r - x..,-‘-^,x45"41,-t-1 .. ... y' b".+-.'a^ �}+ a. - --,•••!"-'."-
---..c....,,,
r.l . a-rjx'.'"+ �'•- ..-.1-..„..-..--4, -,,,......... - a.C'e'c , �� ,:-:-.;..„2„,....:....,,,,,„-. ..1.,...K.,4.--
.+ oJ+.G,� _V' -.4F; .4..... .,.„-..--,f...-1,
-,f... rQ—, .-. .i/'".. + yy„ �i +r +_aar+c -� r ", ry, R, �+..iy ,et--v-,,,i4. r " A*,�. ��yL.._ ` . . ic a .�„'� ?^'' ' " .• �v ,.„,,,„..,,,,,,-;.„„;:‘,..,,,,,,-.7..„...5.
.k�i ar-: •-.,--,.e..;,--,
-tr --Lt..,,,,—(...____t
-3 . f,.,,_A+., '.s. - J3a �Fa:-,..3,1:,,,,, :"., �,s✓%t�� -",,,,, ,r.. r ,• r 41 j -r-
. " ' • 1 #:��YC �A 'r � - . y ,.,, .,r. � �
va`_".. .y "h. � ,y^,o � � ,�.. ` " ' � ty - '" 4 � � trt.,4 � T -yts`' : av ' v �t:, - ~ R `� L � w� f t.M `:✓,. laL .i^Far..i 2 T,w .y . 4 " ,r, trtti 4,.w' -, �" '" ,f c . +Y' c` + .�Y�-y:� a9',"ty�"„ r+,7' IT�`Y-- 4 w • � •��".- !`. stf :r'- r °•ri+ ;'a'.'P � _ , � INQUIRIES_ TOX, l, -.----'-4,,'-1,•-•1"”14.;.'"--.--.••.,. ''
•
,Y « ` �" A- -+S " ', � ',.,..7.-1,-.
'. ND"• : ' `'�1Ke^4 . -a�� ' � Nz'OLyOGY- INC.
X �- � , �.-'.��s_•: :_-,;.,.:•:.-1::.--:1,-::',' :"':„--I-;.-
••. ✓. t ORDSERTSEACH : _ , .,
r1
.�:' ;' "" y�" r• ▪ ,. SPORTBOX 27231Y� 41� � P.O. N 55427 . t 2". , ,, --
-4•"t" .. -+ a•. '4^ ,-,.e..;,-14,-7,147, .....,-,,,,,,,,,,
. .
'. ..,=:-,r-:.,,-
-�r-f7:17;,',."..7-•{{4%.,.-4 ,. GOLDEN VALL2EY
) 5,3M3 2030 'T`""3• s)d .- G cu . .,.3 "� "� ^�j� 67 • "�2.Yma3 txc"A ' • i �; PHONE( 's.'•J ,�-r n . eo .•-=; { � '3•vL'Y A.
t . e"zr•. v --...,,,,,, ---•`-^i-aso ✓ r-ta ; 7a; 4 �`,iRf . ir. G,�f r...r b __•--a :��1 't 71• } ' r ` .
yN k: .¢•. m 'Pdd'S.. s"'� �, ma _ ,.t51tlt2i�f t$;�. N7T^d,� c .esa: F • '�2^`."r' :"a. ' y"flr �'vtkmsS',f_ ' a � '-'",'---'-'-'''''''-
t-,
py �z:o,� ywta• .Y ......,4%a., Ys+emst " iY:a '...' „ :•�-Sr - Li v AiSy:b.,ti•s4 ..`:�a.W c'",-0197,••45.::::.%'.../... ..0.,:"".... ..',",:',..:"._
„'` tt i' ,-''' i'c • ' �I oer.-%'-'.-7.-Z.' ' 5 .4*. `? >j ....”' -,T t 1,.. 3aw -,-.% .i3y ,4 "Zx e9 ti qi.�L`- ,'' t -• Js •s40,
t - -
ab
.e t.
. £" i +
:
..'Y , . x. '• ,' t A!� `ti -i iNA, Y Jj T { Y'I .• 1 ��
st '
r T �cc CPILL • LESS GLARE t
• LL►»
HT �N _ ,
ORE LIG
a r
r - 3 4 4 4 -,-._.•.; ,--,-.4-..-.:-.f.,- ,-,-
j n r1-- L.e- .;a
",,,7',1"'
..-�,t 5>-.xwf" l--i '* • -k i" „� cr ,�3. 6* ...;-:..-4,-..7,-- --..,--
t. .. p, 3- til - i .', ;.,
",.*Y..� '..,.t `fi• 4'R+ '... -'tC� .j- ..R.: '1. ,:-.,2'1„::-4.----,-..,"-T'''''','"
z z t X • R }
t x 1 a ':. : , T-1a Y f, ri-, _,r ' C 1. 'W
• zR*..--;":•;..-..-.6.?.',........),-.,.
r �' • � � tV Y� *'aa,�7 r� , qua '! -a- ; 9 • � 9
•+ S`•'" .-9 ..!• `s'ti z ,.. A +r i a. .r ,t• f '',--n;
_ ti s < ,
a t -,Y,.--.;--''). a "t 7
�.F�',:[�t''`S�R��`:'d.v» tv., - �... ` � � ..:,.a` � �t'F 7 `„,.:‘.S.`4'• :,t,,..: P.: � _ -_ - • _
>_ ^4•� �q.�.w4. { f i as rG
i�L�.ri g �+s, > s
.,Yfi'+?.wra h . +rgc:,:s z'L A �..-:F 'r , S '-'7',":7:-24,,,-,-,..-7"
Itn
,3 ty sfvf;�'!
,t f &:-4: ,- 4:-' �:l J• .1}+, ,,-7c-,,,-•••3.;.-..,,-•-•. ..•••.::
{."�. K --.7::,
►• §v- t F ''-,‘;‘.1';',.?;'.
5.� � '-. L,- Sir t
Y ta' : !Y."•-.'-.`.w+'_ 3`* !r''at..a5 ' .,..'y 2.y a .. r W7 w
Y�r • 3
y g�}Qe 3;: X c ti,�+.- x. �3 n sv . A raw >
S.t ar4^�: tom'' •►Y'"`Y- . , ,_s+. .t r.''� �• .`` A R "' �� +
�.�.,�� • ^r.- s -.:.•>,-...
.. R. y.
%.1'.:-.V.•,.... r•�r, '� .`: -.sit,. r {t •w -, 'L.-i L z�i rzi•-'� ,...n ;+s_. ` 4'_r _
___
.., „:_.
_ _
•5PORT5CWSTER2 A NEW
GENt
.„---.17.:-.777:„.„ .:7„,..,,;:,_,,,,,t,,, ,.44.„:,....„.7.. ,.• - nvCnii .�-pEi`Pp...,ea2 tti ?� raa�'`r
• : '--• G[. h==aara. . . . y. s3..._...... _-=sS � . tf �. , w. :'• . + L
MORE LIGHT . . . LESS SPILL
Sportscluster-2 produces 15-20% more light on the field
;•_. .AVTARSEVI Musco's Sportscluster-2 is a scientific advancement
in the way you light your sports fields.
Six Years in development . . . Sportscluster-2 com- /
bines advanced technology with improved engineering ,`
to give you more usable footcandles of light for every
jawit ,,g7 5 `;;:' kilowatt of electricity you buy. _ • •/ \
Sportscluster-2 takes the light off _ ,/
neighborhood homes and puts it to /
work on the field. This means say-
ings. In installation costs . . . in ./.
The Sportscluster-2 energy bills . . , and in the cost of
patented reflector maintenance.
system redirects Sportscluster-2 is the most eco-
fsield,light onto the nomical dollar value in sports- ,/
lighting today. _ � O
Up to 65% reduction in spill and glare r 'MORE LIGHT
The prior generation of sports-lighting equipment creates spill light that's N ON THE.FIELID
wasted off the field. Light that you pay for in extra fixtures and energy bills,even `
tough you can't use it. And the neighbors '�;,M 4 . . ,47to -e 1'c-
d the roadways around the field don't
ant it.
Sportscluster-2 uses the light that other -� _.....,;
fixtures waste—to put more light on the ���.�. ....._
s
playing field for lower energy costs. ' ��_
Typical solutions for controlling spill —
light in the old generation of sports-
lighting have relied on baffles. louvers or Old Generation New Generation
shields to deflect or absorb light,reducing Sportscluster-2
the amount of light available for the playing field. sPortscluste patent
g P )' o allowed 11/3/87
Sportscluster-2 uses a new reflector system to create a composite of non-
symmetrical beams. This composite beam,along with new patterns of aiming,re-
duces glare by up to 65%.
Even with reductions of this magnitude, the new Sportscluster-2 technology 6 5 0/O
makes it possible to maintain quality lighting and the light levels necessary for
playability on the field. REDUCTION IN
The Sportscluster-2 development is such an innovative new generation of SPILL LIGHT
technology that the United States Patent Office has granted a patent recognizing
the uniqueness of its function.
1,6..'-'W:77:-.f#
- 1x ` rse -.. lg,SYtR �YL+idM-W�= W
With
•2
,9
Sportscluster-2 is the only way to get
A.. effective spill and glare control while
you increase the useable light on the
�! . - • field--all without increasing energy
- costs.
• ,C... `
. (1I
Ru„;t-d rniiahili t1.with the added solely assurance ofa U.L.listing for the entire assembly.
98' ' t�; INC Spu i•. i '•e„•' l'1Otected by U.S.Patent Nos.257891.4190881-254694.4374407 Canadian Patent No.1114798.Other patents pending.
R'.�1�TION IN SPORTS-LIGHTING
Improved player satisfaction
Sportscluster-2's reduced glare improves playability. The ball is brighter and
a easier to follow because of the reduced glare of the fixtures. Players and fans alike
enjoy the game more.
Reliability you can count onAlthough Sportscluster-2 represents a new generation in lighting technology,
` the new system retains all the rugged reliability of the original Sportscluster
which has set the standard for outdoor sports-lighting over the past ten years.
Like the original equipment,Sportscluster-2 is entirely factory engineered as
N. a lighting system so that all components work together. It continues to carry
N warranties unprecedented in the industry.
The new generation Sportscluster-2 is still the only sports-lighting system
�. with the safety assurance of a UL listing for the entire assembly. Sportscluster-2
N continues to provide the easy servicing and guaranteed alignment which have
Nalways been available with Sportscluster systems.
N. Extraordinary control for serious problems
NSportscluster-2 has all the light control that most fields ever need...built right
\/ into the system.
But if you have an extreme light control situation,Sportscluster-2 provides a
A/' Level 8 control modification for extraordinary spill and glare control, exactly
�/ where you need it.Glare and spill reductions as high as 85-90%can be achieved
with Level 8 without loss of playability.
�40/ The customized service of Level 8 control includes a complete field analysis
�/� by Musco factory-trained technicians, who tailor solutions to your specific
.— problems.
—�....-• Level 8 is versatile control. Dramatic and visible relief for serious light
pollution problems—without giving up playability on the field.
Our written commitment to you
Your Musco representative will work with you to plan and design a
Sportscluster-2 system that's right for your playing requirements and for your
budget.
Musco will provide you with ourwritten commitment before you need to make
your commitment to a 20-year capital improvement. You'll know,before you buy
the system, exactly what results you can expect.
Once your field specifications have been determined,your representative will
- - _ prepare a detailed analysis for you. He will document actual light level increases
and designated areas and amounts where spill will be reducer.
Our documentation is your assurance that the new generation of
Sportscluster-2 is a system that will achieve everything you've been promised.
It's guaranteed. That's Musco's commitment to your satisfaction!
Ordinary .
SPORTS-LIGHTING
Conventional types of sports-lighting • MOMPIP
illuminate the field and the houses
and roads around it.
•
Original Sportscluster Sportscluster-2 Sportscluster-2 with
Level 8 modification
^�- 'k i5- •''.;‘,..',..,:•:..7......!
^ °,_ , - r _ . ,; ; `#�`ic ,"Scf- .4 f'''_.,-rk W* .i,,, s:. ', �'t't'7r..�- s'.. ». 1-
rte. �. .-:'':^-
t ` s ..'f"• s r.• :...:..t.,.`2.7,.,-.'..17-...-- } 4 .<i ryv "%7'r s�Z. '. "
t l j .s.';'-,.:::*- j S 3�. -L W •'r'. 3-gFr.+. A, - qy:.`.- ...N :- j `x �}'
•
•
..: �,c31 ^jr ,r s i, . x. ty-3 s^. 4•., •-''
ki. - _ . _ , 'r - L. J t..M ) 1 n w IT'. y 4„,64.,..,::,,,.;.•_;,,,=:,..::....-,-_-.--7 ,- -,-
Z. Y - ".z_ --.f- ^: , �` icemo -.....-5--.2--.--:'---.-->!,- i . -, ! j .$ .
a. , " _ c-..�.- ' - ,---t-z-1.,--P
-.-_ —' e, n- .. .� e. Yt ; `+ V t ' 1 °fF `� , Vw .;,---4-,;_..,-.7
' • � c K \ ♦ y ; r _ Yy ,` l .t•yi . S -'4 v. d_ ,11---y I ca h_ 1._ _
•
_
.� ... 3.- -tea.-.. .-77 ...;�w
b nefits
all the e
ou et with g . .J t1v
--,-,-. . '-.,‘_-:::::,-- 1-,,,---_:---:...
SPORT
s "
orts lighting: all
roach to sp ether.
tl A system-app en sneered to work tog -•—_,,•,---,-;.---,•,•'".,,,-.
components factory g covering the entire
Safer op
eration:UL listing =
assembly ballasts, capacitors and fusing ?. '
Easa.
ier servicinb• '
os
located in an electrical service center for easy r Y
access. with
Pleasing appearance: trim,neat assembly = `
wiring enclosed inside c Tuneneci efactory-aiming, a _ _ ,
Guaraeto w hin a hap-degree; guaranteed for r
accurate
five years.
re light on the
pperating cost reduction:mo fixtures. ...:,5.
playsn8 field without adding `- ••'•-•:,...1.`'
ill and glare: spill light surface.d off
Reduced spill ing
- neighbors' homes and onto ar glare. t
�_ More playability: reduced p y ear warranty
.,s five-y _
Guarantee• re usco tec labor
•
with parts and labor when M arts and
install the system;two years with p
•
plus
five-years on alignment when snstalled by
others. ,..: ,.
•
Sports Technology/P.O. Box 27231/Golden Valley, MN 55427/612/533-2030
0000
. musc®
Mounds View High School Football/Soccer/Track Don Hewitt
Booster Committee
612-934-8881 •
Richfield High School Football/Soccer Dick Walker
Football Coach & Maintence Dir.
612-861-8245
Totino-Grace High School Football/Soccer/Track Dave Nigon
Football Coach
612-571-9116
Benilde-St. Margret High School Football/Soccer Fr. Tom Andert
Principal
612-927-4176
Breck High School Football Joe Kordowski
Athletic Director
612-377-5000
Mound-West Tonka High School Football Victor Niska
Superintendent of Facilities
612-472-1600
WAa, High School Football Roy Hazelton
Building & Grounds Director
507-452-1868
Marshall High School/City Football/Baseball Harry Weilage
Park & Recreation Director
507-537-6767
Chatfield High School Football/Track Jerry Bernaz
Athletic Director
507-867-4210
• • h • - - ootball/Soccer Vern Moening
Park Superintendent
612-425-4521
Waconia High School Football Robert Lind
Principal
612-448-2818
Belgrade High School Football/Track Duane Swenson
Superintendent
612-254-8212
PerilHigh School Football/Track Bob Wilkowski
Athletic Director
218-346-6500
Light-years ahead.,.through technology
-2-
B rtha-Hewitt High School Football Earl Mathison
Superintendent
218-924-2500
Evansville High School/City Football/Baseball Don Elmers
Booster Committee •
218-948-2291
Blackduck High School Football Jerry Sonnek
Athletic Director
218-335-2203
Cass Lake High School Football Ron Millbrant
Athletic Director
218-335-2203
Proctor High School Football/Baseball Jeff Caywood
Athletic Director
218-628-2273
Two Harbors High School Football Elmer Fraham
Superintendent
218-834-5513
Barnum High School Football Wayne Pender
Athletic Director
• 218-389-6978
Harmony High School/City Football/Softball Leon Gunderson
Booster Committee
507-886-4391
Ramsey, City Soccer/Softball Meryl Mevison
Public Works Director
612-784-6700
Blame, City Soccer Mike Westendorf
Soccer Association
612-754-1826
Byron High School Football Robert Carlson
Superintendent
507-775-2301
Coon Rapids, City Soccer
Grove City High School Football
Ada High School/City Football/Baseball
Hinkley High School Football
•am High School Football
Foley High School Football
Sleepy Eye High School Football
Morton High School Football/Softball
• • Sports Technology/P.O. Box 27231/Golden Valley, MN 55427/612/533-2030
•. •
• •
Must®
SOFTBALL FIELD LIGHTINGS
NAME # OF FIELDS POLES PER FIELD CONTACT
Eagan 4 4 Ken Vraa
Park & Recreation Director
612-454-8100
St. Louis Park 2 4 George Haun
Park & Recreation Director
• 612-920-3000
Minnetonka 2 ' 4 Lloyd Pally
Operations & Maintenace Dir.
612-938-1431
Lakeville 2 4 Steve Michaud
Park & Recreation Director
612-469-4431
forth Mankato 4 4 Bob Ringhofer
• City Manager
507-625-4141
;hamplin 3 6 Brett Heitcamp
Park & Recreation Director
612-421-8064
racoma 4 4 Bill Engelhardt
Landscape Architect
612-448-8838
tillwater 1 6 Niles Kriesel
City Administrator
612_L1'3'9-6=
elle Plaine 1 6 Jack Schuneman
Softball Association
612-873-2234
amsey 2 4 Meryl Mevison
Public Works Director
612-427-4180
watonna 3 6 Corky Ebling
Parks Supervisor
507-455-0800
outh . Paul 1 4 Randy Nelson
Park & Recreation Director
Lightylears:ahead...through technology 612-451-3111
-2-
1111
Rosemount 3 4 Dave Bechtold
Park & Recreation Director
612-423-4411
Bemidji 1 4 Dan Haluptzok
Park & Recreation Director
218-751-5610
New Germany 1 4 Gordy Miller
Mayor
612-353-2160
Corcoran 1 6 Bob Derus
City Administrator
612-420-2288
Silver Bay 1 6 Duane Northagen
Park & Recreation Director
218-226-4214
Evansville 1 8 Don Elmers
(combination baseball) Softball Association
218-948-2291
Co 1
(combination baseball) 8 Joel Dhein
City Administrator
612-286-5813
Milaca 1 6 Jerry Lang
Softball Association
612-983-2501
Le Sueur 1 4 Mery Hentges
Utilities Director
612-665-3338
Northfield 1 4 Community Services Director
507-645-6676
Zimmerman 1 4 Dave Horvath
Public Works Director
612-856-4666
Glencoe 1 4 Bruce Donnay
Softball Association
612-964-2202
Lir 1 4 Jeff Savelkoul
Park Board
612-422-0314
Princeton 1 8 Brad Ekstrom
Softball Association
612-389-5115
-3-
HAIny 2 8 Leon Gunderson -
(combination football) Booster Club
507-886-4391
Proctor 1 4 Dan Hoffman
City Administrator
218-624-3641
Rice 1 4 Tom Brasel
Councilman
612-255-7153
Winstead 1 6
Barnum 1 6
Oakdale •
1 4
•
1111
' J -7
• MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL =
FROM: ADMINISTRATION SECRETARY/DEPUTY CLEpga
DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 1990
SUBJECT: BACK-UP OPTECH SYSTEM FOR GENERAL ELECTION
Per your direction I contacted Business Records Corporation
(BRC) , the company from whom we purchased the Optech III
-P Scanning Equipment regarding the price of a back-up unit.
Attached you will find a letter from BRC indicating that the
cost of a back-up system is $6,000 and would include the
following:
- Optech III-P (tabulator)
- plastic ballot box
- one prom pack
- carrying case
• As you will also note in their letter BRC states that nearly
every city has a back-up system. My question is, do you
want me to proceed with a purchase of a back-up unit previous
to the General Election, November 6th, 1990 or would the
Council rather budget this item on a future budget?
/mjs
•
BUSINESS RECORDS
CORPORATION - •
:\ `rte =
August 31, 1990 ``'. ; }J "
---
,s2, .,..4� ,tea
Michelle Severson ac,�;1Z� �6� ��
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112
Dear Michelle:
Business Records Corporation (BRC) is looking forward to supporting you on the
September 11th elections.
We suggest that the City of Mounds View purchase a backup system. Almost evert city •
has a spare system available to assure that the election goes smoothly. The cost of a
back-up system is $6,000. This includes the Optech III-P, a plastic ballot box, one prom
pack, and a carrying case.
Thanks for giving us the opportunity to serve you in the upcoming election.
Siperely,
o_.-62_,SZ4A-ti ,
Lee Storbeck
Vice President of Sales
cc: Kevin Lafeber
bs
III
7227 Third Street South, P.O. Box 1082, St.Cloud, MN 56302 Phone: 612-253-2170
bAfVC1
• MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL =
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY/DEPUTY CLERK
DATE: SEPTEMBER 13, 1990
SUBJECT: COUNCIL MEETING VIDEO TAPES
In a conversation with Mayor Hankner on Wednesday, September
12, 1990 I brought up the subject of video tapes that are
being requested by the public for viewing or loan.
I researched our records and found that we do have a policy
(88-2) for retention of video tapes and a corresponding
resolution (Resolution No. 2277) . These two documents are
attached to this memorandum. In reviewing this information I
feel that No. 3 in both documents should be rewritten as
follows:
Any individual wishing to view video tapes of
Council meetings may sign them out with the
Clerk's office in lieu of a $20 . 00 refundable
deposit upon their return. If the individual
wishes to purchase a tape of the meeting the
• ' charge would be $20.00.
The revenues from these tapes should be placed back in the
Cable TV budget.
The purpose for changing the current policy is there are many
more requests being made to view the tapes and to have persons
make an appointment, have the Clerk's Office set up the VCR
and tape, locate the tape and then return the VCR takes time
from the other many duties of the staff. This also requires
keeping track of the time spent in setting up this equipment
and then keeping track of the time when the more simple way
to handle this would be to loan out the tape requiring a
deposit.
The only time there would be a problem with this would be when
the individual who wants to view the tape does not own a VCR.
I think Item 4 could be deleted as the new Item 3 would cover
this effectively.
/mjs
• _ _
ADMINISRATIVE POLICY 88-2
POLICY 'FOR RETENTION OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING VIDEO TAPES
This policy relates to the retention of City Council Meeting
video tapes.
1. The televised proceedings of the Mounds View City
Council meetings are presented for the convenience and
information of the residents of Mounds View. Official
actions of the City Council are set forth in the
approved Council minutes.
2. All video tapes shall be retained and made available
for public inspection for a period of 60 days or until
all scheduled rebroadcasts have occured, whichever
occurs later.
3. Any individual wishing to view video tapes of Council
meetings shall be required to make an appointment with
the Clerk-Administrator 's office to schedule the
viewing. Should a member of staff be required to
expend more than 30 minutes arranging equipment and
facilities or assisting the individual with the
viewing of these tapes, the requesting party shall be
required to compensate the City for all expenses
related to this staff member 's time spent in excess of
the initial 30 minutes.
4. Should an individual request copies of the video tapes
that -have not been reused or destroyed, the requesting
to the copying of the tapes including staff time.
Effective Date : 01/11/88
•
- - =
RESOLUTION NO. 2277
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR RETENTION OF CITY
COUNCIL MEETING VIDEO TAPES
WHEREAS, the official meetings of the Mounds View
City Council have been cablecast and video recorded since
November of 1986 ; and
WHEREAS, the televised proceedings of the Mounds View
City Council meetings are presented for the convenience and
information of the residents of Mounds View. Official
actions of the City Council are set forth in the approved
Council minutes; and
WHEREAS , it is not the desire of the City of Mounds
View to retain video tapes of all televised Council meetings
• due to the expense related to the number of required v.ideo
tapes and the lack of available storage; and
WHEREAS , it is the desire of the Mounds View City
Council to adopt an official policy relative to the
retention, reuse, and the destruction of said video tapes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council
of the City
of Mounds View establishes the following policy
relative to the retention of City Council Meeting video
tapes.
1. The televised proceedings of the Mounds View City
Council meetings are presented for the
convenience and information of the residents of
Mounds View. Official actions of the City
Council are set forth in the approved Council
minutes.
2. All video tapes shall be retained and made
available for public inspection for a period of
60 days or until all
schedule
laderrebroadcasts have
occurred , whichever occurs
3. Any individual wishing to view video tapes of
i • Council meetings shall be required to make an
appointment with the Clerk-Administrator 's office
to schedule the viewing . Should a member of
staff be required to expend more than 30 minutes
•
•
•
0 - - --,
RESOLUTION NO. 2277 (e"-
PAGE TWO • ,
arranging equipment and facilities or assisting
the individual with the viewing of these tapes,
the requesting partyshall be
to
compensate the City forallexpenseserelated
to
this staff member 's time spent in excess of the
initial 30 minutes.
3. Should an individual request copies of the video
tapes that have not been reused or destroyed , the
requesting party shall compensate the City for
all costs related to the copying of the tapes
including staff time.
Adopted this 11th day of January, i988.
ATTEST:
111
Ma. .r
(SEAL) 'WA*
/0an0t0
Cle k-Ad inist Wit.
•
II
•
. (- t
ra
•
kje.24/t, ;?
MEMORANDUM
Memo To :Mayor and Council Members
From :Ric Minetor, Acting Clerk-Administrator
Date :September 7 , 1990
Subject :Temporary Vending Permits
The attached letter from Kraus-Anderson Realty Co . requests
restrictions on the issuance of temporary vending permits. Our
code requires a permit from anyone involved in temporary vending
unless associated with a local business. The code requires the
permit to state the location where the sales will be conducted
unless the organization sponsoring the sales is a religious,
philanthropic, or similar organization.
The City Attorney will be providing a written opinion regarding
this issue. My concern is that we may get several additional
requests from other businesses requesting restrictions on these
types of permits. One example is the sweet corn stands that we
111 see through out the City. If we begin restricting street vendors
for flowers , will the grocery stores request the same of
vegetable stands.
Staff is requesting Council's direction in this matter.
KRAUS-ANDERSON REALTY COMPANY
' '' . '' DEVELOPMENT • LEASING • MANAGEMENT
August 21, 1990n --;
6" '
:r
0 T
Mr. Rick Minetor T-1_,-. / ., r\J
City of Mounds View \ ";: _' c;~'
2401 Highway 10 ','': ..
r;
Mounds View, MN 55112 �' "� fiy
Dear Mr. Minetor:
Kraus-Anderson has had the opportunity to lease a bay in Silver
View Plaza Shopping Center on the corner of County Road I &
Highway 10, to Addie Lane Florist Shop effective September 1,
1990. This particular tenant is concerned about the city of
Mounds View granting temporary vending licenses to people who
choose to sell flowers during specific holidays on the corner of
County Road I & Highway 10. Our tenant states that these
temporary licenses are typically granted on the holidays that are
the most successful to floral shops, and that these street
vendors have a tremendous negative impact on their business.
411 Therefore, on behalf of our tenant, we are asking the City of
Mounds View to persuade these vendors to sell at other locations
where 1. ) it is not effecting businesses which are making long
term commitments to the city of Mounds View, and 2) . due to the
heavy traffic at this intersection, the city should be concerned
about cars stopping on impulse on a road which has a 55 mph speed
limit.
We are interested in going before the city council on this issue
and can be reached at 332-1241 for scheduling.
Best regards,
41„CALga.
Theresa Hart
Senior Leasing Agent
TH/mp
cc: Addie Lane Florist
III
52:3 outh Eighth Street • Jliin eapolis, MIiniiesfnta 55-10-1-107 • (NI'') 3.12 i2. Ii
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 1990
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 3090
APPROVING THE SILVER VIEW PARK
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
The Silver View Park Improvement Plan has been re-written including the revisions
which were directed by Council at the agenda session on September 17, 1990.
Previous text describing the addition of 8 - 12 foot buffer areas have been stricken
throughout the plan. Mowing practices of the past have been described and included
in the plan narrative and working papers.
The plan should be consistent throughout the text, being referred to as the Silver
View Park Improvement Plan. Estimated costs have been revised and the timeline has
been expanded to include 1991-1995 as shown on the Capital Items Chart.
The plan has been re-organized for easier comprehension. Recommendations have
been written in more detail.
The blob map, which shows the parks three concept areas, has been revised to include
the pond pathway as Concept #2, Passive/Nature Area. A more detailed park
property map has been included, although, it is a poor copy. The blueprint machine
is in for repair and the copy of the sepia map produces a "duty" copy. A clearer map
will be given to the Council when the blueprint machine is back in operation.
This plan has been re-written in a short time, to accommodate the September 24
Council meeting. It has been proof-read several times by several people. I believe that
the requested revisions are included. Therefore, it is requested that Council approve
this Silver View Park Improvement Plan as presented in this document dated
September 24, 1990.
MS/SL