Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packets - 1990/06/11
CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW JUNE 11, 1990 5:00 P.M. WETLANDS STUDY COMMITTEE 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL - BLANCHARD, PAONE, WUORI, QUICK, HANKNER 4 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 29, 1990 Regular Meeting • COUNCIL ACTION: 5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: None 6 . PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. 7:10 p.m. - Consideration of Renewal of Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Robert's Off 10 COUNCIL ACTION: B. 7: 11 p.m. - Consideration of Renewal of On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Donatelle's Supper Club COUNCIL ACTION: C. 7:12 p.m. - Consideration of Renewal of On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Mermaid Cocktail Lounge, Inc. S AGENDA 411PAGE TWO JUNE 11, 1990 COUNCIL ACTION: D. 7:13 p.m. - Consideration of On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for Loose Ends On 10 COUNCIL ACTION: E. 7:14 p.m. - Consideration of Renewal of Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for B and R Liquor COUNCIL ACTION: F. 7:15 p.m. - Consideration of Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Budget Liquor COUNCIL ACTION: G. 7:16 p.m. - Consideration of On-Sale Wine License • for Bel-Rae Ballroom COUNCIL ACTION: 1. Consideration of Approval Of On- Sale and Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses COUNCIL ACTION: H. 7:17 p.m. - Consideration of Kraus-Anderson Text Amendment 1. Consideration of Ordinance No. 487 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View By Amending Chapter 40 Entitled, "Zoning" COUNCIL ACTION: • AGENDA PAGE THREE JUNE 11, 1990 I. 8:00 p.m. - Joint Public Hearing with the Spring Lake Park City Council to Consider the Proposal of the Spring Lake Park Lion's Club to Rename Lakeside Park COUNCIL ACTION: 7 . RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 8. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Approve Reconstruction and Fencing of Bona Road/Edgewood Drive Pathway as Outlined in Staff Memorandum Dated May 30, 1990 • B. Set Public Hearing for 7:10 p.m. on June 25, 1990 to Consider Proposed Master Plan for Silver View Park C. Authorization of Submittal of Capital Assistance Grant to Metropolitan Council for Recycling Containers D. Set Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m. on June 25, 1990 for Wetland Alteration Permit Request to Construct a Porch Addition for Duane Betker, 2310 Sherwood Road E. Set Public Hearing for 7: 15 p.m. on June 25, 1990 for Jim Eilers to Construct a Shed in the Buffer Zone, 2296 Lois Drive F. Authorize Hiring of Bruce Pebble and Tim Bauer as Part-Time Public Works Employees at the Rate of $6 .00 Per Hour to be Funded by the Sewer Fund G. Authorize Staff to Enter Into an Agreement with Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. for Services for Establishing and Implmenting a Surface Water Management Utility AGENDA 111PAGE FOUR JUNE 11, 1990 H. Authorize Staff to Approve Feasibility Report for Long Lake Road Reconstruction I. Adopt Resolution No. 3042 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds J. Licenses for Approval Gasoline Stations - Expires 12/31/90 Mounds View Phillips 66 Bait and Tackle - Renewal Restaurants - Expires 6/30/91 Le Metro Cie, Inc. - Subway - Renewal Kentucky Fried Chicken - Renewal COUNCIL ACTION: 9 . COUNCIL BUSINESS: A. Approve Proposal for Greenfield Park Baseball Field Improvements and Bids • COUNCIL ACTION: B. Appointment of Councilmember to Serve on Fire Department Bond Referendum Task Force COUNCIL ACTION: C. Consideraton of Resolution No. 3043 Amending the 1990 Budget COUNCIL ACTION: 10. REPORTS: A. Report of Attorney B. Report of Staff Members C. Report of Councilmembers: Blanchard, Paone, Wuori, Quick, Hankner D. Report of Administrator411 D p,TE P►t'Pµ%v0' (01-4r, 410 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPROVEDRegular Meeting June 11, 1990 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Mayor Hankner at 7:05 PM on Monday, June 11, 1990. Order Tha 2ie•d e of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of Allegiance MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Blanchard, Wuori, 3. Roll Call Quick and Mayor Hankner. It was noted Councilmember Paone was absent. ALSO PRESENT: City .Attorney Karney, Clerk/Admini- strator Pauley, City Engineer/Public Works Director Minetor and City Planner Hren. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Wuori to table approval of 4. Approval of the May 29 minutes until June 25, 1990. Minutes: May 29, 1990 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried There were no residents requests or comments from 5. Residents the floor. Requests and Comments from the Floor Mayor Hankner requested Item H be removed from the 6. Approval of consent agenda. Consent Agenda Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve the consent agenda, minus Item H, and waive the readings of the resolutions. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried City Engineer/Public Works Director Minetor explained 0 the County has completed their final feasibility report on the Long Lake Road reconstruction, with some minor changes from the draft feasibility report, and he reviewed the plan. Unless the Council decides Mounds View City Council June 11, 1990 Regular Meeting Page Two otherwise, MSA funds will be used for the City' s • portion of the project. Due to the amount of work to be completed, it will be scheduled in two phases. Councilmember Wuori questioned why Ardan and Random Parks were not included. Mayor Hankner also asked for clarification of how the pipeline would be handled, and she requested the pipeline and two parks be added as an addendum to the report. Councilmember Paone joined the meeting at 7:15 PM. Mr. Minetor stated he would ask the County to do an addendum. Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, questioned whether there would be a public hearing on this. He also questioned what the feasibility study entails, pointing out it already has errors in it, and suggesting the City not approve it until it is correct. Mayor Hankner replied they need to get those items included and any approval would be contingent upon the inclusion of the corrections. Mr. Minetor explained a public hearing would be required by the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners and they would like the City to work with them in that, which he believes would be some time in the fall . He clarified that they are looking for acceptance, not approval, at this time. Mayor Hankner directed Mr. Minetor to send a letter to the County concerning the errors and ommissions in the report. Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to table Item H, the authorization for Staff to approve the feasi- bility report for Long Lake Road reconstruction, to June 25, 1990. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened 7. Public Hearing : the first public hearing at 7:21 PM. Consideration of Kraus City Planner Hren reviewed the request of the Anderson applicant for a text amendment to allow a furniture Request fo showroom as a permitted use in the 82 district. The Text Amendn .t Mounds View City Council June 11, 1990 Regular Meeting Page Three • Planning Commission reviewed the request and discussed a number of issues. They do recommend approval of this request, defining the use as a furniture showroom. Mayor Hankner noted an ordinance change would require two readings and it would be 30-45 days after pub- lication. Jerry Linke, of Kraus Anderson, reviewed the plan of the applicant for his business, and indicated where it would be located in the shopping center. He noted they have had many problems with the way the zoning code is written and what is allowed and what is not allowed. Councilmember Paone stated that as long as it is not a retail outlet sale, he has no problem with it. Councilmember Wuori clarified that it will be a retail outlet, but the inventory will be off site. Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting. at 7: 29 PM. • Motion/Second: Paone/Wuori to have the first reading of Ordinance No. 487, amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 40 entitled "Zoning", and waive the reading . 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened 8. Public Hearing the next public hearing at 7:31 PM. Consideration of Renewal of Clerk/Administrator Pauley noted the Ramsey County On-Sale LicensE Health Department had been asked to inspect each of for Robert 's the on-sale intoxicating liquor establishments. Off 10 While the reports have : not been received by the City yet, he believes all establishments passed. The Fire Department and Police Department have submitted their reports. Ramsey County was contacted and advised there are no delinquent taxes on any of the properties licensed for the sale of intoxicating liquor in the City. A review was also done of the current status of utility billings, and all but Loose Ends are current. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Staff would • recommend approval of the renewal of the on-sale intoxicating liquor license for Robert ' s Off 10. Mounds View City Council June 11, 1990 Regular Meeting Page Four Mayor Hankner noted all approvals would be contingent upon receipt of the report from the health department. 411 There were no comments from the audience, so Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:33 PM. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to approve the renewal of the on-sale intoxicating liquor license for Robert 's Off 10, contingent upon receiving a favorable report from the health department. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened 9. Public Hearing : the next public hearng at 7:33 PM. Consideration of Renewal of Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the applicant On-Sale License is fully paid up on all accounts. for Donatelle ' s Supper Club There were no comments from the audience, so Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:34 PM. Motion/Second: Quick/Paone to approve renewal of the on-sale intoxicating liquor license for Donatelle ' s Supper Club, contingent upon receiving a favorable report from the health department. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened 10. Public Hearing : the next public hearing at 7:35 PM. Consideration of Renewal of Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the applicant On-Sale License Cocktail Longe, There were no comments from the audience, so Mayor Inc. Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:35 PM. Motion/Second: Wuori/Blanchard to approve the renewal of the on-sale intoxicating liquor license for the Mermaid Cocktail Lounge, Inc. , contingent upon receiving a favorable report from the health department. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened 11. Public Hears: the next public hearing at 7:36 PM. Consideration of Renewal of On-Sale License for Loose Ends on 10 Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting June 11, 1990 Page Five Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Loose Ends • property passed the fire inspection, but they have not paid the first half of their liquor and restau- rant inspection fees, but have stated they would pay them by June 30. Alice Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, asked if anyone had checked to see if they are serving food. Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied he had checked three weeks ago and they were serving food on Sunday. Steve Locke, owner of Loose Ends on 10, stated they serve food on Sunday only. He added they passed the health inspection last Wednesday and will have their license fees paid in full within the next week. Clerk/Administrator Pauley noted it is allowed by Code to pay only half the license fee for on-sale establishments at one time. Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:39 PM. 0 Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve the renewal of the on-sale intoxicating liquor license for Loose Ends on 10, contingent upon receiving a favorable report from the health department, and payment of halfthe license fees by June 30. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened 12. Public Hearing: the next public hearing at 7:40 PM. Conati-dera. --ion Mr. Frits asked for a clarification of whether of Renwal of it was on-sale or off sale, for both B and R LOff ice Liquor and Robert 's Off 10. Lice-Sale for ee B and R Liquor It was clarified that Robert 's Off 10 is on-sale and B and R is off-sale. There were no further comments, so Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:41 PM. Motion/Second: Paone/Wuori to approve the renewal of the off-sale intoxicating liquor license for B and R Liquor. •5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council June 11, 1990 Regular Meeting Page Six Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened 13. Public Hear' the next public hearing at 7:41 PM. Considerati • of Renewal of There were no comments from the audience, so Mayor Off-Sale Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened the License for regular meeting at 7:41 PM. Budget Liquor Motion/Second: Quick/Paone to approve the renewal of the off-sale intoxicating liquor license for Budget Liquor. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened 14. Public Hearing : the next pulic hearing at 7:42 PM. Consideration of On-Sale Clerk/Administrator Pauley noted the applicant is Wine License current on all fees and payments, but the report for Bel-Rae from the health department has not been received Ballroom yet. There were no comments from the audience, so Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:43 PM. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to approve the renewal of the on-sale wine license for Bel-Rae Ballroom, contingent upon a favorable report from the health department . 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Park, Recreation and Forestry Director =Saarion 15. Approve Pro- explained the suggested improvements for the Green- posal for field Park baseball field had been discussed at the Greenfield Park last agenda session. Staff is recommending the Council Baseball Field approve three phases of improvement. The costs are Improvements estimates, and the work would be done as the money is and Bids available. Ms. Saarion reviewed the work to be done, including the installation of a new backstop. That would put the project over budget by $666, but the MVAA would be willing to contribute that amount. If this is approved tonight., work could begin this summer. Wayne Burmeister, of the Park and Rec Commission, stated the Commission has not had an opportunity to review everything, but they have given conceptual approval . Mayor Hankner asked if it was possible to come up • with any other funds in the budget for this work at this time. Mounds View City Council June 11, 1990 Regular Meeting Page Seven Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained this is what has been set aside in the budget, but they could evaluate the budget to see if additional funds can be located. He recommended the proposed improvements be approved tonight. Ms. Saarion reviewed the specific work to be done and the bids received, for the fencing, backstop, warning track and turf improvement. Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve the recommenda- tion as stated, with the inclusion of the backstop in the amount of $1, 796, for the Greenfield Park baseball field. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Hankner/Panne to appoint Councilmember 16. Appointment of Quick to be the Councilmember to serve on the Fire Councilmember Department Bond Referendum Task Force. to Fire Depart- ment Task Force 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried • Clerk/Administrator explained that as a result of 17 . Consideration actions taken by the Legislature in the past few of Resolution months, the City expects a reduction in local govern- No. 3043 ment aid in the amount of $31, 159. The proposed Amending the resolution reduces revenue and expenditure line 1990 Budget items as necessary, to keep the budget in balance. Motion/Second: Paone/Blanchard to approve Resolution No. 3043, amending the 1990 general fund budget. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Hankner called a short recess at 7:59 PM. The 18. Public Hearing: Spring Lake Park City Council joined the Mounds View Consideration City Council when the meeting was called back to of Proposal of order at 8:05 PM, for a joint public hearing to con- Spring Lake sider the proposal of the Spring Lake Park Lion 's Park Lion ' s Club to rename Lakeside Park. The Spring Lake Park Club to Rename Council was introduced as Councilmembers Mason, Lakeside Park Mathiowetz, Conde, Carlson and Mayor Wells. Mayor Hankner declared the public hearing as opened and welcomed the Spring Lake Park Council and explained the purpose for holding the joint public hearng. IIIBill Stuart, 857 Valentine, introduced himself as a representive from the Lion's Club and explained why they are asking for a name change. He noted in the past the Lion's have not gone out and asked for Mounds View City Council June 11, 1990 Regular Meeting Page Eight recognition for what they have done, but they are nowII/ experiencing difficulties in getting new members because people do not know what the Lion ' s organization is all about. The international organization has agreed they need to get recognition. He noted the Lion' s Club is a very community minded organization, where the community comes first, then they go outside to support needs elsewhere. Mr. Stuart noted that many of the things the Lion 's Club does cannot have a name put on it, but something like Lakeside Park would be good name recognition. He clarified they are not asking to take over the park, and they do not want to take it over, they just want some recognition there. He also thanked those in the past who have worked on the park. Mr. Stuart stated he felt some type of recognition should be put up in the park, giving credit to all who have worked on it. Additional work toward completion of what the Lion's Club is doing at the park will begin soon, to include the ballpark, pathway, seating, etc. They also hope to put up a fishing dock at some point in the future. He noted the Lion ' s Club has give over $235,000 to the park in the past few years, and that amount will soon be close to $250, 000. Bob Helseth, 7666 Knollwood Drive, questioned if they . want to put their name on top. Mr. Stuart replied they want in some manner to insert the name Lion' s, whether it would read Lakeside Lion's Park or Lion' s Lakeside Park. Mr. Helseth suggested putting the name on the side, on a plaque or something else, and not including it in the parks name. Mayor Wells questioned if Mr. Helseth had an objection to having the name included in the park name. Mr. Helseth replied he does, as he feels the Lion's are pushing the older people who worked on the park aside. Mayor Wells suggested some type of listing of all the people who contributed to the park, thereby also giving recognition to those who started the park. Mr. Helseth noted there would be many people to list. He further stated he does not want to see the Lion's name associated with the park name, pointing out that neither Mounds View nor Spring Lake Park have included their names. Mounds View City Council June 11, 1990 Regular Meeting Page Nine • Councilmember Conde gave a history of Lakeside Park and the many people who were involved in its develop- ment. He stated he does not favor changing the name, but would favor a large sign on the bath house giving credit to the Lion ' s Club. He stated he has nothing against the Lion' s, and he is a member himself. He also noted it was not unanimous among the Spring Lake Park Lion' s Club members that the name change should occur. Mary Johnson, 7964 Spring Lake Park Road, stated he has lived in the area since the 1940s, and he reviewed the history of the park and the involvement of many people. He stated he does not feel the Lion' s Club should be given full credit for the park, but rather the community should receive the credit. He agrees the Lion 's Club could have their name somewhere in the park, but they should not be given more credit than just being associated with it. He added they should be commended for their generosity but he noted many groups and individuals have given money for the park. He also pointed out in 25-40 years, if someone else makes a good contribution they could request the name be changed again. • Ruth White, 2917 County Road I, stated she feels it takes a lot of guts for the Lion's Club to feel they are so generous that they need a park named in their honor. She stated the park belongs to the people, not the Lion's Club. She noted many people have donated money and time. She agrees they should be credited for the good work they do, but does not feel the park should be named after them. She added if they are that good of an organization, they will have good name recognition. She further suggested they could be named on a specific building, but not in the park name itself. Bill Frits reviewed the history of the park, back to the time when the City was a township, and the development of the park system over time. The decision was made a long time ago to not give name definitions to the parks, but rather name them by location, and nothing else. He noted many people have been involved in the development of Lakeside Park, and he equated it as being similar to the community effort expended in building the playground at Pinewood School. He stated the only difference in the bath house is that it was built with community money, not community involvement. He added he completely supports the Lion's organization ibut is opposed to renaming the park, as it is not a Lion' s park but rather the peoples park. Mounds View City Council June 11, 1990 Regular Meeting Page Ten Councilmember Blanchard reviewed the history of the • park, taken from the booklet on Mounds View history. She noted how it tells of the residents of the area working together and building the park, and that they did not just contribute money but also built it them- selves, and also maintained it. She stated she feels it is self gratification that is taking the place of commitment with the Lion 's Club, and that you cannot put monetary value on this. She also stressed that the Lion ' s Club did not build the park but rather enhanced it. She noted there is a beautiful plaque going up, giving recognition, and changing the name is wrong, as it was the citizens of Mounds View and Spring Lake Park who built the park, not the Lion's Club. Councilmember Paone stated Lion' s International wants the local groups to get recognition, and for people to be aware of what they do. He noted they are a community service organization, active in community projects, and he sees nothing wrong with a plaque or sign in the park but he does not feel the name needs to be changed. He stated it would be different if the ground was bought and developed by the Lion 's Club, but it wasn 't. He added they are a very good organization, .but he does not approve of changing • the historical name. Councilmember Conde stated he would like to thank Bob Helseth, who gave him the records and history of the park. Laurie Helseth, 7666 Knollwood, stated many women have given a good deal of time to the park also. The work was done by many individuals, and Lakeside Park should remain Lakeside Park. It is a community name and should stand. Councilmember Mason noted many Lion's Clubs have nice signs upon entering a city, and asked if something similar would be appropriate to place at the park. Mr. Stuart replied it strikes him that it would appear the Lion ' s Club is trying to take over the park. He again stated the Lion's Club needs new members to keep going. Councilmember Carlson stated she didn't feel people would understand what Lion's Lakeside Park would mean, and she didn't believe people would associate it with the club. She added she feels greater recognition would come from having an emblem posted. • Mounds View City Council June 11, 1990 Regular Meeting Page Eleven IIICouncilmember Wuori stated if the Lion ' s Club needs recognition, it would be better to show pictures of people doing the work, and make it an on-going pub- licity campaign and not just a one time sign in the park. Mr. Stuart stated they do not get enough recognition that way. They have had a lot of publicity in the newspapers, but not that many have seen it. He noted this would be for the betterment of the community, to be able to get new members to keep the work going in the community. Councilmember Blanchard stated that if recognition is needed, a plaque should cover it, with the name, emblem, and so forth, and she questioned why that isn ' t enough. Mr. Stuart replied not many will see it, but if their name was on the sign at the entrance to the park, it would be much more visible. Councilmember Mathiowetz stated that for all the years when the park was first created until it formally became Lakeside Park, the name wasn' t • that important, and he questioned why it has become so important now, and what would be so terrible with changing the name. He stated he agrees the Lion's Club did not start or build the park, but they did enhance it. He stated the Lion's Club has donated funds and effort again this year to enhance the park, and are now working on the ball- field. He stated just because they weren't there at the front end they should not be penalized at this time. He also stated he feels there is an aversion to the name. He is a member of the Spring Lake Park Lion's Club and understand the importance of getting the name out. He feels the Councils are making too strong an issue out of this, and there should be a sign at the entrance giving credit to the Spring Lake Park Lion's Club for improvements made to the park. He added he does not have a problem with adding the Lion's name to the name of the park. MayorlWells stated he had heard both sides of the issue and could support much of what Councilmember Mathiowetz had said. He agreed there is a lot of history in the park but he did not know how either city would have come up with the money for the • improvements that have been done to the park. He pointed out the Lion's Club is willing to fill the gap and he feels the name addition would be a commitment from the Lion' s Club for many years down the road, and he very much supports the addi- Mounds View City Council June 11, 1990 Regular Meeting Page Twelve tion of the Lion's name, to"Lakeside Lion's Park - • by and for the people of Mounds View and Spring Lake Park". Mayor Hankner stated she was concerned about the loss of local government aid, but she did not feel the Lion' s Club was in a position to make any long term commitment in any part, as their funds are not certain either, and charitable gambling could change at any time. She noted the attitude and value of the community has been stressed tonight. She noted the Lion's Club is seeking recognition and she supports that but is not convinced a name change of the park will do it. She pointed out the state has added a community service credit for high schools, which could be a possibility for the Lion' s Club to go into the high schools. She added she would be supportive of a sign or emblem, but not a name change. Mr. Stuart replied the Lion ' s Club does a lot in the schools already in the way of scholorships, drug awareness and so forth. Mr. Frits noted the lake name is officially Wood Lake. He added he feels charitable gambling will cause many • problems in the future. Mayor Wells stated many people are not familiar with the name Lakeside Park and he does not feel a name change would affect many, other than those who originally worked on it. He agreed charitable gambling is not here forever, but he does not feel a name change takes something away. Councilmember Conde pointed out the VFW has done much in the •-rte • . - _ . . -. • . • organization and he feels a special sign, the largest allowed by code, giving credit to the Lion's for build- ing would give the greatest recognition. He also questioned what would happen with the name in the future if the Lion' s Club could not support the park. Mayor Hankner noted the park is under a joint powers agreement. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised both Councils would have to act separately, with each Council passing by a 3 to 2 vote. If both Councils do not approve a name change, the issue dies. Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 9: 25 PM. Mounds View City Council June 11, 1990 Regular Meeting Page Thirteen 0 Motion: Mathiowetz•that the City of Spring`Lake Park go on record to change the existing name of Lakeside Park to have it formally changed to Lakeside Lion' s Park. Councilmember Mason - nay Councilmember Conde - nay Councilmember Mathiowetz - aye Councilmember Carlson - nay Mayor Wells - aye Motion Failed Clerk/Administrator Pauley suggested the Councils could direct the Park and Rec Directors of both cities to meet with the Lion' s Club and discuss an entrance sign and meet with the Councils at a future date. Motion: Mason to have the two Park and Rec Directors get together with the Lion's Club and discuss alternate methods of recognition. Councilmember Mason - aye Councilmember Conde - nay Councilmember Mathiowetz - aye Councilmember Carlson - aye Mayor Wells - aye Motion Carried • Councilmember Mathiowetz stated he understands there are no funds for signage. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Paone that the City Council of Mounds View deny the name change requested by the Lion' s Club for Lakeside Park. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Paone/Blanchard to have :the Lion's Club and Park and Rec Directors get together to work on some type of recognition sign. • 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried An unidentified individual stated that if they do not ask., it will never happen. He expressed appreciation to both Councils, stating their decision may or may not be fair. The Lion's Club commitment will not change, but the focus may, but they will still work for the good of the community. The Spring Lake Park Council left the meeting at this time. 410 Councilmember Blanchard stated she felt the City should have some type of policy to address issues of this type in the future, and read a prepared statement about not naming a park or any other facility after an individual or organization. Mounds View City Council June 11, 1990 Regular Meeting Page Fourteen Mayor Hankner directed Staff to work with the suggested draft and place it on the agenda for discussion next week. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised it should be in resolution form. Attorney Karney had no report. 19 . Report of Attorney There wereno reports from Staff members. 20. Report of Staff Members Councilmember Blanchard had no report. 21. Reports of Councilmembers: Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Paone had no report. Councilmember Paone Councilmember Wuori had no report. Councilmember Wuori Councilmember Quick asked that the starting time Councilmembefb of agenda sessions be placed on the agenda for next Quick week. Mayor Hankner asked for an update on the traffic Mayor Hankner study meetings held on June 5. Mr. Minetor replied approximately ';i60 people attended and they will be getting feedback from the consultant soon. Clerk/Administrator Pauley had no report. 22. Report of Clerk/ Administrator There being no further business before the Council, 23. Adjournment Mayor Hankner adjourned the meeting at 9: 50 PM. Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley Clerk/Administrator ADMINISTRATIVE NEWSLETTER JUNE 11, 1990 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW VOL. X NO. 11 CITY HALL TOURS The annual trek of Pinewood School students to the City Hall site for tours of our facilities occurred this past Wednesday and Thursday with 121 first and fourth graders and 100 third graders passing through our portals. These students were given a tour of our Police, Public Works and Water Treatment Plant facilities with the fourth graders receiving a brief talk from me on City Government and the services that cities provide to them. ANNUAL LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES CONFERENCE The Annual League of Minnesota Cities Conference will be held from June 12th through June 15th in Duluth. I will be attending this conference and leaving at approximately noon on the 12th and not returning until after the end of the business day on Friday, June 15th. Public Works Director Ric Minetor will be acting on • my behalf during that time. RECYCLING CONTAINERS GRANT APPLICATION We have been notified by the Metropolitan Council that they will be considering the City's application for funding of the purchase of recycling grants as well as a variety of other grant applications over the next few weeks. Final action will be taken on awarding the grants, including the City's of Mounds Views, if it passes the review process on July 12th at the meeting of the full Council at 4:00 p.m. on that date. Michelle Hren will be attending these meetings to answer any questions and watch the progress of our grant application. SPACE NEEDS STUDY The interview portion of the City Hall Space Needs Study is nearing completion with the wrap-up portion of this phase expected to occur on the week of June 18th. This final step in the interview phase allows the opportunity for everyone to review the responses to the interviews and revise any of the information as may be appropriate. MTC BUS SHELTERS I recently received a letter from Mr. John J. Capell, Chief Administrator of the Metropolitan Transit Commission regarding the reactivation of the MTC's Bus Shelter Program. The MTC has • identified the location of Long Lake Road and County Road H as a • ADMINISTRATIVE NEWSLETTER PAGE TWO JUNE 11, 1990 potential location for a bus shelter in the City and is requesting our comments regarding this site. The letter suggests, however, the City may wish to consider other sites if a minimum of 40 passenger boardings occur on an average weekday at that site where the City is willing to share in the cost of the construction and maintenance of shelter. Finally, Mr. Capall asks if the City is willing to allow advertising to be placed in these shelters for revenue purposes and the terms and conditions of the advertising. I have attempted to contact Mr. Capell and his assistant to obtain several pieces of information prior to bringing this before the Council, however, both gentlemen are out of the office for at least one week. The additional information I am seeking is 1) a map showing the current bus routes and locations of shelters in the City. Current boarding statistics at each stop location. 2) Current boarding statistics at each stop location, 3) terms and conditions for advertising in other cities for our reference and for confirming the fact that the City has authority over the location of the shelter at Long Lake Road and County Road H even • though the shelter would be on County road right-of-way. I am asking for this last piece of information because the MTC did not consult the City when placing a shelter at Long Lake Road and County Road H2 and I am concerned that the County be consulted with respect to this matter if appropriate. CALENDAR June 11 5:00 p.m. Wetlands Ordinance Study Committee 7:00 p.m. Council Meeting June 12 8:30 a.m. Department Head Meeting Noon - June 15 - League of Minnesota Cities Conference June 16 1:00 p.m. Hillview Park Open House June 18 9 :00 a.m. Space Needs Study Wrap Up Interview 7:00 p.m. Agenda Session June 19 8:30 a.m. Department Head Meeting 411 June 21 Noon MAMA LUe/w) 6 - MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 111 FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATOR •� DATE: JUNE 7, 1990 SUBJECT: INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS In preparation for your public hearings on the renewal of on- sale and off-sale intoxicating liquor licenses on the evening of June 11th, staff has completed the following investigations: 1. The Ramsey County Health Department has been asked to inspect each of the on-sale intoxicating liquor establishments. These inspections will be completed during the week of June 4th and reports will be available for you on the evening of June 11th. 2 . The Fire Department was consulted regarding the inspection of all establishments. Inspections and reinspections were recently completed on all establishments other than Loose Ends. These establishments either met the Fire Code at the first inspection or made the required corrections prior to • reinspection. Loose Ends was inspected on May 8 and a reinspection has been scheduled for June 8th. It is my hope that a report on this reinspection will be available for you at the hearing. 3. Police Chief Ramacher has advised me that there were no activities or incidents in the past 11 months that he feels should jeopardize the issuance of these licenses. A copy of Chief Ramacher's memorandum is attached for your information. 4 . Planning Secretary Barb Benesch contacted Ramsey County - - on any of the properties licensed for the sale of intoxicating liquors in the City. 5 . A review of the current status of utility billings on each of these establishments reveals that, except for Loose Ends, all bills have been paid. With respect to Loose Ends, the establishment is past due in the amount of $1,483 . 11. City Attorney Karney has advised that the City is prohibited from denying renewal of the license due to past due utility accounts as Loose Ends is protected from such action under their Bankruptcy filing of 1989 . • • MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE TWO JUNE 11, 1990 Pending the results of the Health Department Inspections, staff finds that these establishments are all in compliance with existing City Codes and would recommend renewal of their licenses. DFP/mjs • • . TO: DON PAULEY, CL -4/ ADMINISTRATOR FROM: POLICE CHI ,AOJ�/ DATE : MAY 18, 1990 SUBJECT: ON - SALE AND OFF - SALE LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWAL I reviewed the activities/ incidents from July 1 , 1989 through May 15, 1990 on the following liquor establishments: ROBERTS OFF 10 MERMAID SUPPER CLUB/STREAMERS LOOSE ENDS ON 10 DONATELLES SUPPER CLUB • BEL RAE BALLROOM BUDGET LIQUOR B & R LIQUOR There are no activities/incidents in the past eleven months that would jeopardize any of our issued licenses. I recommend the above liquor licenses be renewed. • MEMORANDUM V-rf4x,• '7:17 M TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Planner, Michelle Hren DATE: June 7, 1990 SUBJECT: Kraus Anderson - Text Amendment (Furniture Showroom) The Planning Commission reviewed the request of Kraus Anderson for a text amendment to allow a furniture showroom as a permitted use in the B2 District. The Planning Commission unanimously expressed support of this use in a B2 Zoning District. Please find enclosed the Planning Commissions resolution recommending to the City Council approval of the requested amendment which includes a definition of showroom. Also please find a draft City Council Ordinance regarding this request. • If you have any questions please feel free to call me. • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION 411 RESOLUTION NO. 292-90 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TEXT AMENDMENT BY KRAUS-ANDERSON TO ALLOW A FURNITURE SHOWROOM IN A B-2 DISTRICT, PLANNING CASE NO. 298-90 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request by Kraus-Anderson for a Zoning Code text amendment that would allow a furniture showroom in a B-2, Limited Business District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the uses allowed in the B-2, B-3 and B-4 Business Zoning Districts; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has taken into consideration the location of other B-2 Districts throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the • compatibility of the furniture showroom with the uses allowed in the B-2 District and has found the use to be in keeping with the nature and intent of the B-2 Zoning District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends to the Mounds View City Council approval of the requested text amendment based on the following: 1. The definition of a furniture showroom will be, "a retail facility for the sole purpose of displaying items for selection but not inventoried on site" . 2 . The text be amended to allow a furniture showroom as a permitted use in a B-2 District. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 6th day of June, 1990 . ATTEST: Chairman (SEAL) • City Planner . ORDINANCE NO. 487 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 40 ENTITLED, "ZONING" The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. Chapter 40.02, Subd. B, shall be amended by adding the following: (46) Furniture Showroom. A retail facility used for the sole purpose of displaying items for selection but not inventoried on site. SECTION II. Chapter 40 .17, Subd. B, shall be amended by adding the following: The following are permitted uses in a B-2 District: ( 14), Furniture showroom without warehousing. • SECTION III. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 11th day of June, 1990 . Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1990. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: 0 City Attorney 59° DOUBLE WIDE STAGINGRECEMNG DOORS Q 0 R BATHROOMS AREA A was STORAGE N 12' opt.P\ 1 Accessories © © © & . 4it:. iirrl 0 Inds Lamps DERATING © ©1a Room E I \ I- I., 494, "Pe 7 Bed a df . — ellesearthanveI 7 ® Nt ■ Bed r 0,0, , el,. w-.-1. ■ Bed ,A / Vd, 5i7 . ‘/v ‹,4 , r Bed "al. • (4§4" . S .0 ---------- 0 cfr dilfr _____ ____4fr 0• i II \<> ,.. ...-- 4:4 e/ qtak. qtrk. /E' - 0 4:4 E Dinh' EL [1 i< r lith vi• \..1 ane ' ' 0 Ughtboxes Ughtboxes i7 1a..1•a..J • / O 1L JM/L.J ' A o MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Planner, Michelle Hren DATE: June 7, 1990 SUBJECT: Metropolitan Council Capital Assistance Grant (recycling Bins) Please find enclosed a resolution that formalizes the City of Mounds Views request for a capital assistance grant for the purchase of recycling bins for the City. The capital assistance grant was 33 pages of written text therefore I have included only the cover sheet that briefly explains our request. If you have any questions please feel free to call me. mmm RESOLUTION NO. 3044 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION REQUESTING FUNDING FROM THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL FOR A CAPITAL ASSISTANCE GRANT TO PURCHASE RECYCLING BINS FOR THE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View has submitted a capital assistance grant to the Metropolitan Council for the purchase of recycling containers for the residents of Mounds View; and WHEREAS, the City of Mounds Views recognizes that the ultimate goal of the recycling program is abatement of solid waste from the landfills; and WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View believes that providing recycling bins to the residents will strengthen and encourage the recycling program; and WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View believes that utilization of the bins increases tonnage of recyclable materials, • thereby, supporting the abatement goal; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the city of Mounds View has directed staff to prepare and submit the grant application. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View requests assistance from the Metropolitan Council for the purchase of recycling bins. Adopted this 11th day of June, 1990. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator • 4f s 6. METROPOLITAN LANDFILL ABATEMENT FUND . • CAPITAL ASSISTANCE GRANT PROPOSAL COVER SHEET FY90-91 1. Name of Project Sponsor: City of Mounds View Mailing address: 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 2. IRS Tax-Exempt Number: 9034948 3. Project director/contact person name: Michelle Hren Title: City Planner Phone: (612) 784-3055 Address: 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 4. Authorized Official name: Donald Paulev Title: Clerk-Administrator Phone: (612) 784-3055 Address: 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 5. Third Party information, when applicable: a) Name: b) Address: c) Authorized representative: Title: Phone: • d) Minnesota Tax ID number: 6. PROPOSAL SUMMARY Briefly summarize the major benefits and goals associated with the project. The Major benefits and goals associated with the project are to increase recycling participation, increase recycling material tonnage thereby reducing the amount of solid waste ending up in landfills, and increase public awareness by providing a semi-permanent recycling sign in the home. 7. Amount of Grant Request $ 29,340 Amount of Local Cash Match $ 30,828 TOTAL GRANT COSTS $ 58.680 • Amount of Other Costs $ 1,488 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ h0 t 6A 12 111 MEMORANDUM Memo To :Mayor and Council Members From :Ric Minetor, City Engineer/Director of Public Works Date :June 6, 1990 Subject :Services for Establishing and Implementing A Surface Water Management Utility Attached is a copy of the proposed agreement for Short-Elliott- Hendrickson, Inc. to provide services in relation to establishing and implementing a Surface Water Management Utility. This would include work necessary for the Final Report, the Public Informational meetings, and the final Public Hearing. The cost is estimated to be $17,600 and can be charged to the Storm Water Management Fund. I recommend that City Council authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. for services relating to establishing and implementing a Surface Water • Management Utility and that costs be charged against account number 420-4121-303 . "Sal MAY 1990 S pV D EERS I ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS Q.S4ONAIS w ER DRIVE sr PAUL,MINNESOTA 55110 612 490-2000 ?MIDI C /168LgG3 May 18, 1990 RE: MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY Mr. Ric Minetor Director of Public Works City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Minetor: Thank you for the opportunity to provide engineering services for the above-referenced project. This letter is an extension of our agreement for engineering services dated February 23, 1987. Our services are based on attached Exhibit "A. " We will expect you to furnish full information regarding your requirements. All pertinent data as well as any special services or extraordinary considerations shall also be made available to us. We request to be compensated for establishing and implementing a Alksurface water management utility, in accordance with Section II.0 of our agreement. Compensation shall be the total cost of personnel times a factor of 2.15 plus the actual cost of reimbursable expenses. The estimated fee for the project is $17, 600. About $7,700 is estimated for preparation of the final report, and about $9, 900 for the public information program. When 90 percent of the budget has been spent, we will stop work and discuss the status of the project with you. At that time, we will determine the basis and cost for completing the work. If the conditions of this letter proposal are acceptable to you, please sign the two copies provided and return one to us. Sincerely, Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. TM raldd/044447/411.4. '?� k L. Lobermeier, P.E. Water Resource Project Manager Accepted this day of , 19 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA SHORT-V IOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC. •BY: BY: / SHORT ELLIOTT ST PAUL, CHIPPEWA FALLS, HENDRICKSON INC. MINNESOTA WISCONSIN EERS t ARCHITECTS■PLANNERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE ST PAUL,MINNESOTA 55110 612 490-2000 May 18, 1990 RE: MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY Mr. Ric Minetor Director of Public Works City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Minetor: Thank you for the opportunity to provide engineering services for the above-referenced project. This letter is an extension of our agreement for engineering services dated February 23, 1987. Our services are based on attached Exhibit "A. " We will expect you to furnish full information regarding your requirements. All pertinent data as well as any special services or extraordinary considerations shall also be made available to us. We request to be compensated for establishing and implementing a "' surface water management utility, in accordance with Section II.0 of our agreement. Compensation shall be the total cost of personnel times a factor of 2. 15 plus the actual cost of reimbursable expenses. The estimated fee for the project is $17, 600. About $7,700 is estimated for preparation of the final report, and about $9, 900 for the public information program. When 90 percent of the budget has been spent, we will stop work and discuss the status of the project with you. At that time, we will determine the basis and cost for completing the work. If the conditions of this letter proposal are acceptable to you, • - _ : • . ' . - . Sincerely, Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. ,rate,rrti. 7M rk L. Lobermeier, P.E. Water Resource Project Manager Accepted this day of , 19 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC. OBY: BY: SHORT ELLIOTT ST PAUL, CHIPPEWA FALLS, HENDRICKSON INC. MINNESOTA WISCONSIN SCOPE OF WORK 111 Scope of Work Tasks required to establish and implement a storm water utility include: 1. Concept Plan 2. Final Report 3. Implementation Task 1 - Concept Plan The Concept Plan is an informative document. It defines how a utility benefits the community, methods for implementation and the typical charges. The Concept Plan is an important tool which becomes an integral part • of the public information program. The Plan is written so it can be used as a handout during public meetings. The Concept Plan is similar to a feasibility study. The plan provides enough detail about the utility method to allow you to decide whether to proceed. The Concept Plan has been prepared as part of the City' s Surface Water Management Plan (April 2, 1990) . • Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. Page 1 EXHIBIT A • SCOPE OF WORK !II Task 2 - Final Report Specifics of your utility program are included in the Final Report. Actual quarterly charges for each property type are established. Charges are based on the City's zoning. (The fee for each individual property is not developed. ) The report includes a detailed estimate of expenditures to be covered in the utility program including the five-year Capital Improvements Program, developed as part of the City's local water management plan. A draft ordinance language is also included. The Final Report "fine tunes" the data in the Concept Plan. Charges indicated in the report represent a commitment on the City's part to carry out the program. Information in the Final Report is needed for the public information program and public hearing. The outline of the Final Report eport follows a format similar to the Concept Plan: Section 1 Summary Section 2 Introduction Section 3 Fee Basis Philosophy Revenue Equation Expenditures Charges Exclusions Section 4 Administration Section 5 Draft Ordinance S Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. Page 2 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK Task 3 - Implementation SEH may be involved in the implementation to varying degrees. The major items include: I. Public Information Program The public information program, as outlined in the Concept Plan, includes newspaper articles, City newsletter articles, handouts included in utility billings, informational meetings and public hearings 2. Adoption of Ordinance An Ordinance, based on the language in the Final Report, is adopted. 111 3. Billing Procedure Modification Based on the charges established in the Final Report and adopted by City ordinance, the charge for each property in the City is determined. Once the charges are determined, the method of utility billing is amended to include an extra line for the storm water utility. • Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. Page 3 EXHIBIT A SCHEDULE 410 Figure 1 April 23, 1990 Council authorizes SEH to prepare Final Storm Water Utility Report. Mid-June 1990 Information notices regarding utility are sent with utility billing. July 2, 1990 SEH presents draft Final Report to Council, staff and legal/financial advisers at work session. July 18, 1990 City hosts public information meeting regarding utility. • Newspaper articles detail City utility plans. July 23, 1990 City finalizes list of anticipated costs to be covered by utility. Local Storm Water Management Plan Five-Year Capital Improvements Program is incorporated as utility program. August 6, 1990 Final quarterly property charges are approved by Council during work session. August 27, 1990 SEH completes Final Report. Presents it at Council meeting. • Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. Page 4 EXHIBIT A • SCHEDULE August 28, 1990 City hosts second informational meeting. City begins to determine individual property costs. City investigates modification of utility billing. Ordinance is finalized. Notices for public hearing are included in October utility bills and in area newspapers. September 10, 1990 City holds public hearing and adopts utility program. January 1, 1991 • Utility billings are modified. Actual quarterly charges take effect. • Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. Page 5 EXHIBIT A tj MEMORANDUM Memo To :Mayor and Council Members From :Ric Minetor, City. Engineer/Director of Public Works Date :June 6, 1990 Subject :Feasibility Report for Long Lake Road Reconstruction Attached is the final Feasibility Report for Long Lake Road reconstruction. There are only minor changes from the draft feasibility report previously approved by Council. The changes include typographical errors and minor changes to the descriptions of the existing facilities. I recommend Council approve the feasibility report. • • WI( q- RESOLUTION NO, 3042 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WHEREAS, The City Council has reviewed the claims numbers: 30683 through 30783 in the amount of $ 35,976.49 30272 through 30285 in the amount of $ 74,750. 51 through in the amount of $ through in the amount of $ TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ .110,727.00 • and has found said claims to be just and correct; (list of any exception) NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated 06/12/90 by the vote ayes nayes ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator • . . • 0 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT l 16 VALERIE AMUNDSEN 30683 06/12/90 06/12/90 2.00 2.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351002 ANT- 2.00 DESC-VALERIE AMUNDSEN/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 2.00 00 CLAYTON FOSBURGH 30684 06/12/90 06/12/90 64.00 64.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 ANT- 64.00 DESC-CLAYTON FOSBURGH/UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 64.00 01 ED GIBSON 30685 06/12/90 06/12/90 64.00 64.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 ANT- 64.00 DESC-ED GIBSON/UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 64.00 02 ARTHUR PATNODE 30686 06/12/90 06/12/90 24.00 24.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 AMT- 24.00 DESC-ARTHUR PATNODE/UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 24.00 24.00 00 MIKE MCKANE 30687 06/12/90 06/12/90 32.00 32.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 ANT- 32.00 DESC-MIKE MCKAHE/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 32.00 32.00 l SHARON BREVER 30688 06/12/90 06/12/90 4.00 4.00 ACCOUNTNUMBER- 250-3500-354241 ANT- 2.00 DESC-SHARON BREVER/REFUND AprNUMBER- :50 .3L'.00-354255 ANT - 2.00 DESC-SHARON BREVER/REFUND -���� ��' VENDOR TOTAL 4.00 4.0O )2 CROSS OF GLORY 30689 06/12/90 06/12/90 50.00 50.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-353208 ANT- 50.00 DESC-CROSS OF GLORY/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 50.00 )3 BETTY JACOBS 30690 06/12/90 06/12/90 10.00 10.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351005 AMT- 10.00 DESC-BETTY JACO8S/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 10.00 10.00 --1 JULIE MURPHY 30691 06/12/90 06/12/90 2.00 2.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-354229 ANT- 2.00 DESC-JULIE MURPHY/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 2.00 )5 CATHERINE NESSER 30692 06/12/90 06/12/90 23.00 23.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250 )500-J51010 ANT- 23.00 DESC-CATHERlNE NESSER/REFUHD VENDOR TOTAL 23.00 23.00 >6 DARLEEN SWENSON 30693 06/12/90 06/12/90 30.0O 30.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-354233 AMT- 30.00 DESC-DARLEEN SWENSON/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 30.00 )8 FRERICHS CONSTRUCTION* 30694 06/12/90 06/12/90 145.00 145.0O ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-2304-000000 AM[- 145.00 DESC-FRERICHS CONST CO/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 14'1 .00 145.0O 0 )9 THOMAS LYNCH 30695 06/12/90 06/12/90 34.19 34.19 IE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10141/ MOUNDS VIEW 1DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 1O VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 ANT- 34.19 DESC-THOMAS LYNCH/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 34. 19 34.19 10 DAN STOLTZ 30696 06/12/90 06/12/90 68.80 68.80 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 ANT- 68.80 DESC-DAN STOLTZ/REFUND VENDOR. TOTAL 68.80 68.80 1.1 DOUGLAS SWANSON 30697 06/12/90 06/12/90 40.00 40.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 ANT- 40.00 DE:SC-DOUGLAS SWANSON/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 40.00 12 HOLLY BOHAN 30698 06/12/90 06/12/90 2.00 2.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-r,00-351002 ANT- 2.00 DESC-HOLLY BOHAN/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 2.00 13 NANCY BOYLES 30699 06/12/90 06/12/90 2.00 2.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250--3500-351002 ANT- 2.00 DESC-NANCY BO LES/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 2.00 14 JAMES BROWN :30700 06/12/90 06/12/90 2.00 2.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 2. 0•--,.N, 10-0 51 132 ANT- 2.00 6I21 "c,-NES Ltlt !`i,: :i�. J' ' • VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 2.00 :15 JEANNINE CHARTIER30701 06/12/9. 06/ L2/90 2.00 °.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250.3500-.351002 ANT-. 2.00 DESC-JEANNINL= CHAR:TIER:i'REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 2.00 16 JEROME HOKANSON 30702 06/12/90 06/12/90 2.00 2.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-_251402 AMT- 2.00 DESC-JEROME HOKANSON/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 2.00 17 MARK JIRSA 30703 (6/11/90 06/1-'/90 2.00 2.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250•-:'.500-351002 ANT- 2.00 DESC-MARK JIRSA/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 2.00 18 DONNA NEZZANO 30704 06/12/90 06/12/90 2.00 2.00 ACCOUNT HUMBER- 2.50-3500-=:51002 AMI- 2.00 TiESC-DONNA ME47ANO, REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 2.00 19 DEBBIE OLSEN 30705 06/12/90 06/12/90 2.00 2.070 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351002 AM-1- 2.00 DESC-DEBBIE OLSEN/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 2.00 cJ JOLEA TABAKA30706 06r 2/90 06/12/90 2. l0 2.00ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-:351002 AMI••- 2.00 CiESC-JOLEA T•AFiN A,REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 2.00 31 41/. REINHARDT CO. 30707 06/12 90 C5/29/90 2 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 ANT- 52.63 DISC-EA .L.. RE 1NHARDI/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 52.63 .-12..:. �= E ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER C1O-1�1� HOUNDS VIEW DOR CHECK CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 0 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT 07 RONALD LADWIG 30708 06/12/90 06/12/90 152.00 152.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 ANT- 128.00 DESC-RONALD LADWIG/REFUND ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020125 ANT- 24.00 DESC-RONALD LADWIG/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 132.00 152.00 11 ROD MALIK8WSKI 30709 06/12/90 06/12/90 32.00 32.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 ANT- 32.00 DESC-ROD MALIKDWSKl/UMPlRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 32.00 32.00 16 NEIL TOBIASON 30710 06/12/90 06/12/90 192.00 192.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 192.00 DESC-NEIL TOBIASON/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 192.00 192.00 21 LOREN LADWIG 30711 06/12/90 06/12/90 34.00 34.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 230-4352-020119 ANT- 34.O0 DESC-LOREN LADWIG/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 34.00 34.00 CRYSTEEL DIST. INC. 30712 06/12/90 04/30/90 4566.00 4566.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-703000 AMT- 4566.00 DESC-CRYSTEEL/8' TIPPER W/ RC41O VENDOR TOTAL 4566.00 4566.00 )1 DitlITTELSTADT 30713 O6/12/9O 06/12/93 64.00 64.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 230-4352-020119 ANT- 64.00 DESC-DON MITTELSTADT/UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 64.00 29 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE, * 30714 06/12/90 456069 05/22/90 213.48 215.48 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-160000 AMT- 215.49 DESC-PONP'S TIRE SERVICE/TIRE REP VENDOR TOTAL 215.48 215.48 10 CINDY RUNDLE 30715 06/12/90 06/12/90 2.00 2.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351002 ANT- 2.00 DESC-CINDY RUNDLE/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 2.00 )0 ALLEN MISKOWIEC 30716 06/12/90 06/12/90 120.00 120.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 ANT- 120.00 DESC-AL MISKOWIEC/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 123.00 120.00 )2 WILLIAM MAHN 30717 O6/12/90 06/12/90 88.00 88.03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 ANT- 64.00 DESC-BILL MAHN/UMPIRE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020125 AMT- 24.00 DESC-BILL MAHN/UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 88.00 83.00 ,4 SANDRA NANTI 30719 06/12/90 06/12/90 2.00 2.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351002 ANT- 2.00 DESC-SANDRA NANTI/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 2.00 2.00 )2 L -- TI � SONS, INC. 30719 06/12/90 3704 04, 05-N 200.00 200.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 480-4120-303000 ANT- 200.00 DESC-LAMETTI a SONS, INC/UT BD PREM VENDOR TOTAL 200.00 2OO.;O ' E ill ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER C10 MOUNDS VIEW IDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 0 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT 03 HOLIDAY PLUS 30720 06/12/90 06/12/90 100.80 100.80 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4:50-•390000 ANT- 100.80 DESC-HOLIDAY PLUS/SUNRISE SR PICNIC VENDOR TOTAL 100.80 100.80 17 IKE MAURICIO 30721 06/12/90 06/12/90 96.00 96.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 ANT- 96.00 DESC-•IKE MAUR:ICIO/UPIPI E FEE VENDOR TOTAL 96.00 96.00 5 t25 -9 23 AMERICAN OFFICE P4ii�1!U�� 30722 06/12/90 226607 !7-.�r.._t/9i7 7.697.6� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 ANT- 7.69 DISC-AMERICAN OFFICE PROD/CASTER VENDOR TOTAL 7.69 7.6 40 ANCHORPAPER CO. 307 23 6/12 r 5, 72 05/15/901':. i ' f 0 t`�'0 .Or�•1b-00 119.70 7'' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-•'4_;50•-11: 3000 ANT- 119.70 DE'SC--ANCHOF< PAPER CO/COLORED PAPER VENDOR TOTAL 119.70 119.70 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 30724 06/12/90 06/12/90 198.76 198.76 ACCOUNT NUMBER- n0-4S51-020041 AM-- 1.90.76 DESC _C OF ARDEN HILL SITF.:ACK FROGRAM VENDOR TOTAL 196.76 1'93.76 J B t r N PRODUCTS INC 30725 06/17/q0 34'0521 05/23/90 100.15... 100.15 ACIWT NUMBER- 100-•'4260-122000 ANT- 100.15 DESK-BASTIE.N PROD/SUF'PL:CES VENDOR TOTAL 100.1'5 100.15 30 BEACON PRODUCTS 30726 06/12/90 1 .32490 05/30/90 408.30 408. 30 ACCOUNT NUMBER-- 250-4352-160119 AM F- 408.30 DESC-BEACON PRODUCTS/BREAKAWAY t:':;ASE VENDOR TOTAL 408.:30 408.:'0 tv 2B 5 t 22 M J5 £!E1 •�SEJE.t1taEK'S 30727 06/12/90 0�_+r �.�.%90 .80 2.30 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-511000 ANT- 2.80 £!F.SC-BEIS SWENGER• S/PART'S VENDOR TOTAL '.80 2.20 . 0 CAL-PACIFIC PRODUCTS 0728 06/12/90 104393 05/04/90 39.96 39.96 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AliT- 39.96 £IESC-CAL-PACIFIC PRRO£Ii FLDING DLF TS VENDOR TOTAL 39.96 39.96 : CAR LSihEQUIPMENT CONY t,072_. i6/1;. 90 1'723::::7 0•: 1-t.•9: t 5;-.i:.(;0 5(6'.7.. 3r3. r: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-703000 ANN 535.00 IESC-CAFLSO hE 1UIF-..fi -F =H tTrL LCA.= (.R VENDOR TOTAL5 `.00 _.�3. 0 22 CHAF'1N PUBLISHING 07.30 06/12/90 113154 05/13/90 95.00 95. )': ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-••412:1-342000 A-= 95.00 DESC-CHAPIN PUFLISriEHO, ADS VENDOR TOTAL 95.00 95.00 :7 CHIF'F'EWA SPRINL6 CORF'x 307-4 06/12/50 7343055 05/1o/ 90 5•,.25 Al" NUMBER- r�0-42f; 1 0001 F 5. 2,5 r r±._ IN• `,. � J. +� ��_�•-1�,, ti AMT- ..<.:.�.+ s!E.aL-(� dT-'F�;Jt-± 5PR- jii C£;+•t;l-': �.:r`i7l=.r !-.T'I... -Y VENDOR i U I AL :x.25 .2_ S. ,,n -2 ',-3 :90 .y - JV C TO I..CIH:'�� _��7:?r_ 06/12, 90 .... ��i i`J.<. -,i� B[ Ak ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER 'C10W MOUNDS VIEW |DDR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 10 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 AMT- 18.48 DESC-COAST TO COAST/BRUSHES & BOLTS 30732 06/12/90 2745 05/31/90 .36 .36 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- .36 DESC-COAST TO COAST/SCREWS 30732 06/12/90 2741 05/31/90 4.78 4.78 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 AMT- 4.78 DESC-COAST TO COAST/BRUSHES 30732 06/12/90 2656 05/21/90 2.39 2.39 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 AMT- 2.39 DESC-COAST TO COAST/BAN OIL 30732 06/12/90 2683 05/22/90 1.38 1.38 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 ANT - 1. 33 DESC-COAST TO COAST/PARTS 30732 06/12/90 2669 05/22/90 .69 .69 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 AMT- .69 DESC-COAST TO COAST/RECEPTACLE 30732 06/12/90 2715 05/29/90 1.80 1.80 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 ANT- 1.80 DESC-COAST TO COAST/KEY RINGS 30732 06/12/90 2729 05/30/90 2.10 2.10 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-160000 ANT- 2.1O DESC-COAST TO COAST/KEYS VENDOR TOTAL 31.98 31.98 22 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER 30734 06/12/90 003037 05/23/90 33.00 33.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-513000 AMT- 33.00 DESC-COMM CENTER/REPAIR PARTS K LBR VENDOR TOTAL 33.00 33.O0 5 UTOSERVICE, INC. 30735 06/12/90 06/12/90 155.00 155.O0 A[�N��NT NUMBER- 100-4150-363000 AMT- 155.00 DESC-COMPUTOSERVICE/SEMINAR-HlCKOK VENDOR TOTAL 155.00 155.0O 91 CO-OP FARM SERVICE 30736 06/12/90 231315 05/22/90 198.00 198.Ou ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 ANT- 198.00 DESC-CU OP FARM SERVICE/CHEMCIALS VENDOR TOTAL 198.00 198.00 95 COPY DUPLICATING PROD* 30737 06/12/90 120S737 05/17/90 154.00 154.00 ~ ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-112000 ANT- 154.00 DESC-COPY DUPLICATING/PAPER VENDOR TOTAL 154.00 154.0O JO DAVIES WATER EQUIPMEN* 30738 06/12/90 4712 05/10/90 63.53 63.53 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 ANT- 63.53 DESC-DAVIES WATER EQUIP/CURB BOX VENDOR TOTAL 63.53 63.53 55 ELECTRIC MOTOR SPECIA* 30739 06/12/9O O19342 05/2S/90 81.5O 81.5O ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-123000 AMT- 81.50 DESC-ELECTRlC MOTOR SPEC-3/4 MOTOR VENDOR TOTAL O1.5O 81.5O 11 FAIRCON SERVICE 3O740 06/12/90 8-115O 05/22/90 198.00 198.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-511000 AMT- 198.00 DESC-FAIRCON SERVILE/TROUBLESHOT! VENDOR TOTAL 1Y8.00 198.00 16 FIRSTAR NEW BRIGHTON * 30741 06/12/90 06/12/90 25.45 25.4" A T HUMBER- 100-2303-000968 AMT- 25.45 DESC-FIRSTAR/REFUND OF ADMlN Ca)���� VENDOR TOTAL 25.45 25^45 iO ROGER L TREDSALL INC. 3O742 O6/12/90 2149 O5/31/99 1O.31 1O.Si • , I ' GE Aft ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -cow MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 10.31 DESC-ROGER L FREDSALL/PARTS 30742 06/12/90 1972 05/24/90 38.48 38.48 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 38.48 DESC-ROGER L FREDSALL/PARTS VENDOR TOTAL 48.79 48.79 545 GALLAGHERS SERVICE IN* 30743 06/12/90 05/31/90 82.29 82.29 ACCOUNT HUMBER- 255-4121-353000 ANT- 82.29 DESC-GALLAGHER'S/DUMPSTER PICK-UP VENDOR TOTAL 82.29 82.29 111 GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, * 30744 06/12/90 022233 05/21/90 167.00 167.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-160000 AMT- 167.00 DESC-GOODWILL IND/CITY RECYCLING VENDOR TOTAL 167.00 167.00 155 GESTETNER CORPORATION 30745 06/12/90 650654 05/15/90 221.64 221.64- ACCOUNT 21.64ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-113000 AMT- 221.64 DESC-GESTETNER/SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL 221.64 221.64 55 W W GRAINGER INC 30746 06/12/90 497-889117-6 03/17/90 51.76 51.76 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-121000 AMT- 51.76 DESC-W W GRAINGER/LADDERS 30746 06/12/90 497-889405-5 05/18/90 17. 45 17.45 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 ANT- 17.45 DESC-W W GRAINGER/STEPLADDER ` 30746 06/12/90 497-389914-6 05/22/90 100.80 100.80 Agli�N7 NUMBER- 100-4190-121000 ANT- 100.80 DESC-W W GRAINGER/F4OCW 30746 06/12/90 497-889881-7 05/22/90 8.10 8.10 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 8.10 DESC-W W GRAINGER/PART WELL #1 VENDOR TOTAL 178.11 178.11 , i86 HARMON GLASS 30747 06/12/90 210000852 05/18/90 95.90 95.90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-511000 AMT- 95.90 DESC-HARMON GLASS/GLASS REPAIR VENDOR TOTAL 95.90 95.90 .JO MICHELLE HREN 30748 06/12/90 06/12/90 17.57 17.57 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-380000 AMT- 17.57 BESC-MICHELLE HREN/MILEAGE VENDOR TOTAL 17.57 17.57 52 ICMA 30749 06/12/90 06/12/90 423.04 423.O� ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-361000 ANT- 423.04 DESC-ICMA/ANNUAL DUES VENDOR TOTAL 423.04 423.04 O0 IPC SPORT & SCREEN 30750 06/12/90 05/11/90 4546.65 4546.65 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160030 AMT- 599.88 DESC-IPC/T-SHIRTS-HATS-JACKETS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160034 ANT- 411.33 DESC-IPC/T-SHIRTS-HATS-JACKETS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160033 AMT- 353.93 DESC-IPC/T-SHIR7S-HATS-JACKETS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4331-160038 AMT- 353.93 DESC-IPC/T-SHIRTS-HATS-JACKETS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160026 AMT- 246.13 DESC-IPC/T-SHIRTS-HATS-JACKETS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160005 AMT- 535~00 DESC-IPC/T-SHIRTS-HATS-JACKETS Arigwa NUMBER- 250-4351-160029 AMT- 1152.50 DESC-IPC/T-SHIRTS-HATS-JACKETS AliguiT NUMBER- 25O-4351-160024 AMT- 643.70 DESC-lPC/T-SHIRTS-MATS-JACKETS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160010 ANT- 134.75 DESC-IPC/T-SHIRTS-HATS-JACKETS ACCOUNT HUMBER- 250-4351-160011 AMT- 115.50 DESC-IPC/T-SHIRTS-HATS-JACKETS • . ~~~~� 3E ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER 'C1o���� MOUNDS VIEW - 4DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 10 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 4546.65 4546.65 135 INSTY-PRINTS 30751 06/12/90 13188 12/08/89 36.01 36.01 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4330-113000 AMT- 36.01 DESC-INSTY-PRINTS/SUPPLIES 30751 06/12/90 15066 05/18/90 393.88 393.88 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-111000 AMT- 393.88 DESC-INSTY-PRINTS/ENVELOPES 30751 06/12/90 15085 05/22/90 25.00 25.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-343000 AMT- 25.00 DESC-INSTY-PRINTS/SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL 454.89 454.89 .35 JERRY'S FLOOR STORE 30752 06/12/90 33128-33132 05/23/90 4796.00 4796.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 410-4120-705000 AMT- 3000.00 DESC-JERRY'S FLOOR/CARPET & PADDING ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-511000 AMT- 1796.00 DESC-JERRY'S FLOOR/CARPET & PADDING VENDOR TOTAL 4796.00 4796.00 45 LILLIE SURURBAN NEWS 30.253 06/12/90 38673 05/31/90 298.72 298.72 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-341000 AMT- 265.37 DESC-LILLIE SUB NEWS/LEGAL PUBLIC-TN ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-30300O AMT- 21.75 DESC-LILLIE SUB NEWS/LEGAL PUBLICTN ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-2303-000974 AMT- 11.60 DESC-LILLIE SUB NEWS/LEGAL PUBLICTN 30753 06/12/90 06/12/90 26.40 26.4O ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-160260 ANT- 26.40 DESC-LILLIE SUB NEWS/ADS • VENDOR TOTAL 325.12 325.12 30 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT I* 30754 06/12/90 A5160 05/29/90 204.09 204.O9 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 204.09 DESC-MACQUEEN EQUIP/DRT SHOE RUNNER 30754 06/12/90 5397 03/23/90 273.67 273.67 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-123000 AMT- 273.67 DESC-MACQUEEN EQUIF/9 BLADES a WT 30754 06/12/90 5229 05/16/90 129.46 129.46 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-123000 AMT- ' 129.46 DESC-MACQUEEN EQUIP/2 FILTERS VENDOR TOTAL 607.22 607.22 `5O MINNESOTA CELLULAR TE* 30755 06/12/90 02450864 05/18/90 37.10 37. 10 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-303000 AMT- 37.10 DESC-CELLULAR ONE/612-368-0838 VENDOR TOTAL 37.10 37.10 `O0 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 30756 06/12/90 06/12/90 21 .20 21.20 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 21.20 DESC-C OF MV/5671 QUINCY 30756 06/12/90 06/12/90 5.81 5.81 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 5.81 DESC-C OF MV/5544 ST STEPHEN VENDOR TOTAL 27.01 27.O1 00 MUNICILITE 30757 06/12/90 2203 05/30/90 40.00 4O.O0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 40.00 DESC-MUNIClLITE CO/CABLES VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 40.00 iO0 NORTH LEXINGTON LANDS-‹ 30758 06/12/90 05/29/90 7.60 7.6O A NT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 7.60 DESC-N LEXINGTON LANDSCAPING/SOD ���� VENDOR TOTAL 7.60 7.60 �� 'OO NORTHERN STATES POWER* 30759 06/12/9O 06/12/9O 11.30 11.30 GE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C1111/1„ MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 10 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-_: 1000 ANT- 11.30 DESC-NSF`/7840 PLEASANT VIEW DRIVE VENDOR TOTAL 11. 30 11.30 201 NORTHERN STATES POWER 30760 06/12/90 06/12/90 5257.05 5257.05 i ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-324000 AMT- 5257.05 DESC-NSP'/STREET LIGHTING BILL. VENDOR TOTAL 525/.05 5257.05 ::50 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF Ml:* 30761 06/12/90 112721 05/2:3/90 82.60 82.60 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 9.00-4190- :03000 ANT- 82.60 DESC-O FFICE PRODUCTS/SCANNING SERV VENDOR TOTAL 82.60 82.60 )80 PENNZOIL COMPANY 30762 06/12/90 E-060881 0.5/16/90 193.54 193.54 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-170000 AMT- 193.54 DESC-PENNOIL/TRANS FLUID VENDOR TOTAL J93.54 193.54 ?80 POWER UP SOFTWARE CORk 30763 06/12/90 0757275011 05/11/90 129.00 129.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-160000 ANT- 129.00 DESC-POWER UP SOFTWARE/FORMWORK 1 2 ,�9 7.r 275 5 1 7 ! 2 2 :::076_. ab/1�./ �a a�.•7. .•a:.:7 a.-�. 1//���� �.a.a �.a.0u. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-160000 ANT- 20.00 DESC-POWER UP SOFTWARE/QUICK SCHED VENDOR TOTAL 149.00 149.00 r 11MASTER 30:64 06/12/90 15193 05/23/90 249.15 22.49.15 A UNT NUMBER- 100-4150-343000 ANT-- 249.9.5 D •"SC-PR.INTMASTER/BUDGET BOOKS VENDOR TOTAL 249.1:=£ 249.1:: 00 R & H ENTERPRISES 30765 06/12/90 1.6071 05/24/90 27.40 27.40 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 ANT- 27.40 DESC-R e H ENTERPRISES/HOSE & "TUBNG VENDOR TOTAL 27.40 27.40 !00 RAMSEY RECYCLING, INC* 30766 06/12/90 05/29/90 2989.03 2989.03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-303000 ANT- 2989.03 DESC-RAMSEY RECYCLING /MAY RECYLING VENDOR ENIOR TOTAL 2909.03 '989.03 '00 HANS ROSACKER CO 30767 06/12/90 19521 05/2.3/90 26.00 26.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 275-4451-121000 ANT- 26.00 DESC--HANS RO:ALKER/WAX BEG. VENDOR TOTAL TAL 26.00 26.00 '50 PAM DOSE 30768 06/12/90 052990 0=/29/30 78 .00 78. 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-020000 AMT- 78.00 Dl SC-PAMELA ROSE/5-29-90 MINUTES VENDOR TOTAL 78.00 78.00 60 SERCO LABS 30769 06/12/90 58:{ 05/29/90 900.49 9 00 ,6 '5 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-303000 ANT- 900.49 DESC--S:ERCO LABS/LAB ANALYSTS VENDOR TOTAL. 900.49 900.49 7 CORNERS 3077000/12/90/ 507578 05 30/90 f426 75 426.75 90 ACE I-IAf;DvJARx .�,�;._�, ,/.- 2 •f•., � . .. Aillimr NUMBER- 100-4270-160300 ANT- 21:=:.:=:8 DESC-7 CORNERS ACE HDWR/T FOOL : Awl-if NUMBER'- 100--4.360-12'000 ANT- 213,7 CSC-7 COF NERS ACE H.OW1 /Tl OLS 0770 06/12/90 50757 35/30/90 359.80 359.00 ACCOUNT ~0'.5E/ 700-4121-160000 tiNT- 359.30 T LilCORNERS i5 5222. H ,.J1=;: i f�1!''w,.:7 GE ilk ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -Cl-Clow MOUNDS VIEW NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 786.59 786.55 100 MICHELE SEVERSON 30771 06/12/90 06/12/90 5.28 5. 8 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100--4190-380000 ANT- 5.28 DESC-MICHELE SEVERSON/MILEAGE VENDOR TOTAL 5.28 5.23 215 CITY OF SHOREVIEW 30772 00/12!90 126-90 05/25/90 271.46 27._. :0 71: . 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160107 AMT- 271.46 DESC-SHOREVIEW F'K & REC/NEW PRAGUE VENDOR TOTAL 271.46 271.46 605 SNYDERS DRUG STORES 30773 06/12/90 59259 06/05/9025.39 . LJ2C 89 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-160240 ANT- 25.39 DISC-SNYDERS/OEME,AL MTSC VENDOR TOTAL 25.89 25.39 -'001 SFRING LAKE P AFLUMD:M 30774 06/12:90 6812 & 7497 19. /15!•90 26. 35 �n:,_. __.c.�; ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-•51.1000 ANT- 26. 35 DESC-SPRING LK FK LBR CO/LUMBER VENDOR TOTAL 26.35 26. 0 STAR TRIBUNE 30775 06/12/90 05/20/90 70.00 70.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER--- 250-4:53-16021D ANT- 42.00 DESC-STAR TRIBUME'ADS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 25•`+-4121.-160000 ANT- 28.00 DESC-STAR T'R SUNE/A.S • VENDOR TOTAL 70.00 70.00 _50 SYSTEMS c ! FLINC. -:0776 06/12/90 050680 05/21/ .90 3.5..61 •• 5.a• ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100•-4180-114000 ANN 35.64 DESC-SYS T Ely SUF`F'L.Y/F RINT CARTRIDGE 7� 7> _�0r;6 06/12/90 050685 05/22/90 77.50 r; ,;+0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-160000 ANT- 77.50 DESC-SYSTEMS SUF'i'LY/DISKETTE.i VENDOR TOTAL .113.1.1 113.14 755 TRACY OIL COMPANY, INA 30777 06/12/90 1:335 05/31/90 1576.00 1`76.00:7 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-1260-000000 AMT- 1576.00 DESC-TRACY OIL/NO LEAD GASOLINE VENDOR TOTAL 156.00 1576.+x0 ;00 UNITOG RENTALS SYSTEM 30778 06/12/90 28=>2740525 05/25/90 112.77 112.77 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-240000 AMT- 112.77 DESC-UNITOG/UNIFORM RENTAL 832- - .57 :,07;`8 06/12/90 �2,.,-.,�;��Oc;C+1 06/01/90 1.2��. _5; i"_ .7 ACCOUNT NUMBER-- 100-4270-240000 AMT-- 123.57 DESC-UNITOG/UNIFORM RENTAL VENDOR TO 1 L 23• w.: L2:'6. 34 5 - 0 - LITE i0 y 06/12/90 50 50 05/24/Q0, j:•. 1tiL VAN I_a. _ '7, 9 006.-:..+,i•_+J 0.�.� 6. 12 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 7'0-4121-160000 AMT- 6.12 DESC-VAN 0 LIT•E/LT T ST•AT'wOM ALM VENDOR TOTAL 6.12 CHEVROLET • 05/22, 90. 6 1 - J.,- )00 . 2 I00 VIKING CVROLET - �78J 06/12/90 I53l3- 2.80 2.30 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 ANT- 2..80 DESC-VIKING CHEF.'//RETAINER: VENDOR TOTAL 2.80 2.90 ,00 41,NG ELECTRIC 30781 06/12/ 40-r220 05/25/90 57.6H, ACCOUNT NUMBER- 1110-4260--12'•'000 AMT- 57.6: CDESC-VIKING EL .CTRIC/F'A`TS :'07S1 06/12/90 4014?7 10.20 1e,.:, 3E mk ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -COW MOUNDS VIEW IDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 40 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE N1IBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 10.20 DESC-VIKING ELECTRIC/PARTS VENDOR TOTAL. 67.85 67.83 )00 VIKINGS APPROVED SAFE* 30732 06/12/90 H 391715 05/25/90 34.53 :34.5: ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100--4260-160000 AMT- 34.53 DESC-VIKING SAFETY PROD/ICE PACKS J l 17 1 5 2( 50 30782 Jbi 1.t:Jl.�� H :.'9i! 1:� 05/25/90 li.�r._+tl 1t���.•_+t1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 7:30-4121-160000 AMT- 170.05 DESC-VIKING SAFETY PROD/SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100--4260-160000 ANT- 81.45 DESC-VIKING SAFETY PROD/SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 141.15 DESC-VIKING SAFETY PROD/SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 ANT- 193.75 DESC-VIKING SAFETY PROD/SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 ANT-- 7:3.85 DESC-VIKING SAFETY PROD/SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 ANT- 75.20 DESC-VIKING SAFETY PROD/SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER-- 100-4360-240000 AMT- 467.05 DESC-VIKING SAFETY PROD/SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL 1242..03 1242.03 )0 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BL* 8078 : 06/12/90 05/23/90 428.24 423.24 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-253000 ANT- 71.02 DESC-WA:3TE MGMT/JUNE SERVICE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-353000 ANT- 257.22 DESC-WASTE MGIIT/JUNE: SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 428.24 428.24 . GRAND TOTAL AL. 35976.49 35976.:9 • 3E AM ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER -C10411, MOUNDS VIEW 4DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 40 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NNBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT )00 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 30272 05/25/90 05/25/90 40.00 40.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 40.00 .LIESC-C OF NV/8835 GROVELAND RD-BUCK VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 40.00 ?00iRAMSEYCOUNTY = r •:i 3 2,7-, 05/29/90 05/29/90 40 00 40.0 _ PAi:F.S� i;- .:%a,:r•: . � . ,.•0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-160000 ANT- 440.00 DESC-RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS ? CLEC DEPT VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 40.00 i =5 FIRSTAR NEW BRIGHTON * 30274 06/01/90 06/01/90 58760.31 5o760.81 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-010000 ANT- 1400.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-010000 ANT- 8164.21 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-010000 ANT- 1664.25 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-0:1-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-010000 ANT- 3271.39 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-010000 ANT- 2430.92 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES: 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-010000 ANT- 672.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-020000 ANT- 130.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 106-0:1-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100--4200-01.0000 ANT- 21623.33 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER-- 100-4200-011.000 ANT- 275.46 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100--4200--020000 ANT- 511.63 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES STAR/WAGES 06--01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100.-4 : 0-010000 ANT- 650.43DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06.01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-020000 ANT- 284.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 0 -0:1-X90 i NNUMBER- 100-4260-010000 ANT- 1004.30 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES rt - `1 9 AC-NT NUMBG R- 100-4270-010000 ANT- 2470.98 :l'E SC-FI;RSTARi WAGES 06-01.-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-011000 ANT- 112.14 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 AC LJNNUMBER- D0-4a5G- }1100J ANT- 2764.18 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 46-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-020000 ANT- 1006.40 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-010000 ANT- 1993.60 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100`4360-01.1000 ANT- 179.95 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-020000 00-4:60 -J2}OO} n'T- 624.50 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-•90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020000 ANT- 35.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250--435:1-02000: ANT- 400.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT t MB . 250-4351-020011 ANT- 209.75 L EC`»iF=TArGES 06-01-F0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020013 ANT- 192,00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4851-020039 ANT- 77.75 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020102 ANT- 160.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020114 ANT- 176.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4312-020120 ANT- 20.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06--01-90 ACCOUNT 4U Fi- 250-4354-020226 ANT-T- 14.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020229 AMT- 56.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER-;E-. 2cj_4354-022_1 AMT- 42.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES }-- 1i y0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020233 - ANT- 133.25 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020234 A' " - 233.00 DCS. " E 11STtR WAG E` 16-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250 '4351'0 :0237 ANT- 10 .2: DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06"..01"90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020238 AMT- 25.06 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020239 ANT- 73.50 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES v6-O1-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020241 4-02.0.; 41 Ah1T- 14.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACACJIIIi4T NUMBER- 250-4354-020244 ANT- 168.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06._01-90 hC I r1 NUMBER- 250-4354-020250 ANT- 126.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-0i-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4:54- V:v:5- ANT- 98.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT rLOJNT ,N'L' 250-4354-020254 AMT- 28.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES L.f-. LiS '/t 'G_S .ti".i_90 _ . 3E ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER 'C1C�N�� MOUNDS VIEW 4DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 40 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT. T ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020255 ANT- 84.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020256 ANT- 56.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT HUMBER- 270-4120-020000 ANT- 575.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 275-4451-020000 AMT- 712.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 • ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-010000 AMT- 31.32 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ! ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-010000 AMT- 2320.64 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-010000 ANT- 1993.60 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-011000 ANT- 28.04 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-010000 ANT- 2006.14 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 , � ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-010000 AMT- 1993.60 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-01100O ANT- 196.25 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES 06-01-90 ACCOUNT HUMBER- 250-4351-020042 ANT- 82.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/WAGES O6-01-90 , 30275 06/01/90 06/01/90 2382.45 2382.45 , ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-031000 AMT- 1.19 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-031000 AMT- 7.98 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-031000 ANT- 2.61 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-031000 ANT- S5.84 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-031000 ANT- 10.58 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-031000 ANT- 12.62 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-031000 AMT- 4.87 DESC-FIRSTAR/HEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-031C00 AMT- 17.95 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE , NUMBER- 270-4120-031000 AMT- 1.42 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE *NT NT NUMBER- 275-4451-031000 AMT- 1.04 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDIC:;RE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-030000 ANT- 236.86 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-030000 AMT- 127.31 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-030000 ANT- 233.54 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-030000 ANT- 185.98 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-030000 AMT-• 51.41 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-030000 ANT- 110.19 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-030000 AMT- 21.73 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-030000 ANT- 73.84 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-030000 ANT- 185.28 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-030000 ANT- 267.47 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 1OO-4360-03OOOO AMT- 154.61 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-030000 ANT- 3.45 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-030000 ANT- 1.53 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-030000 ANT- 2.14 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-030000 ANT- 36.49 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 275-4451-030000 AMT- 48.96 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-030000 AMT- 2.43 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-030000 ANT- 133.17 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER:- 700-4121-030000 AMT- 145.55 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-030000 ANT- 109.12 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-030000 AMT- 155.32 DESC-FIRSTAR/MEDICARE VENDOR TOTAL 61143.26 61143.26 /OP HEALTH PLAN, IN* 6659.1.13O276 O6/O1/90 06/01/90 6659.14 6659. � Al NT HUMBER- 100-4120-040000 AMT- 219.60 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-040000 AMT- 188.61 DE3C-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-040000 ANT- 549.00 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM . - . ' E ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER C1O-�111 MOUNDS VIEW DOR • CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 0 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT 7 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-040000 AMT- 104.79 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-040000 AMT- 236.08 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-040000 AMT- 222.60 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 AMT- 2659.46 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-040000 ANT- 519.86 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-040000 AMT- 54.90 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-040000 ANT- 439.20 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-040000 AMT- 222.60 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-040800 AMT- 232.15 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-040000 AMT- 445.20 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-040000 AMT- 232.15 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-040000 AMT- 332.94 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/JUNE HEALTH PREM VENDOR TOTAL 6659.14 6659.14 75 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE 30278 06/01/90 06/01/90 17.00 17.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-040000 AMT- 3.40 DESC-MIKHEOSTA MUTUAL/JUNE LIFE INS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-040000 AMT- 3.40 DESC-MINNEBSTA MUTUAL/JUNE LIFE INS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 ANT- 6.80 DESC-MINNEOSTA MUTUAL/JUNE LIFE INS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-040000 AMT- 2.27 DESC-MlNhEDSTA MUTUAL/JUNE LIFE INS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-040000 AMT- 1.13 DESC-MINHEOSTA MUTUAL/JUNE LIFE INS VENDOR TOTAL 17.00 17.00 ]5 FIWITY & GUARANTY L* 30279 06/01/90 06/01/90 98.60 98.60 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-040000 AMT- 2.90 DESC-FID & GUAR/JUNE LIFE INS PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-040000 ANT- 4.35 DESC-FID & GUAR/JUNE LIFE INS PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-040000 AMT- 7.25 DESC-FID & GUAR/JUNE LIFE INS PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-040000 AMT- 2.43 DESC-FID & GUAR/JUNE LIFE INS PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-040000 AMT- 2.90 DESC-FID a GUAR/JUNE LIFE INS PREM , . ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-040000 ANT- 2.90 DESC-FID & GUAR/JUKE LIFE INS PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-040000 ANT- 39.87 DESC-FID & GUAR/JUNE LIFE INS PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-040000 ANT- 6.78 DESC-FID & GUAR/JUNE LIFE INS PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-040000 AMT- .73 DESC-FID & GUAR/JUNE LIFE INS PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-040000 AMT- 5.80 DESC-FID & GUAR/JUNE LIFE INS PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-040000 AMT- 2.90 DESC-FID & GUAR/JUNE LIFE INS PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-040000 ANT- 4.09 DESC-FID & GUAR/JUNE LIFE INS PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-040000 ANT- 5.30 DESC-FID & GUAR/JUNE LIFE INS PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-040000 AMT- 4.10 DESC-FID & GUAR/JUNE LIFE INS PREM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-040000 AMT- 5.80 DESC-FID & GUAR/JUNE LIFE INS PREN VENDOR TOTAL 98.60 98.60 'O PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 30280 06/01/90 06/01/90 3929.75 S929.75 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-033000 AMT- 44.58 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-033000 ANT- 74.55 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-033000 AMT- 146.58 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-033000 AMT- 46.77 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-033000 AMT- 30.15 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACillir NUMBER- 100-4200-033000 ANT- 64.53 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACIIIPMT NUMDER- 100-4200-034000 AMT- 2516.39 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-034000 AMT- 78.05 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-033000 ANT- 12.72 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 . ACCOUNT SS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER C1.011110 MOUNDS VIEW IDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK EC VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-033000 ANT- 45.02 DESC-FEAR--PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-033000 AMT- 115.72 DESC-PEAR-PENSION'S 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-033000 AMT- 168.91 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-033000 AMT•- 92.66 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 2500-4351_03000 ANT- 2.02 DESC-PEARR-F'EN:SIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-033000 AMT- .90 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01.-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-033000 ANT- 1.25 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-033000 ANT- 21.37 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 275-4451-083000 ANT- 28.67 DESC•-F EAP-FENS z OH 3 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-038000 AMT- 1.40 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4:1.20-032000 ANT- 47.21 DESC-P EAR-PENSIONS 6-•01-'90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-033000 AMT- 84.25 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-038000 AMT- 90.57 DESC•-•PEAR-•PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-1032000 AMT- 47.21 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 ACCOUNT dUMZE R- 730-4120-033000 SMT- 70.17 CcSC- FEw:-=EN SI0N5 6-•01-90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 7310-4121-083000 ANT-- 98.10 DESC-PEAR-PENSIONS 6-01-90 VENDOR TOTAL 3929.75 39 :9.75 01 ICMA HOUSING BUREAU 30281 06/01/90 06/01/90 75.00 75.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-363000 ANT- 75.00 DSO i _k { HOUSING B R ) i - • F ?__Y VENDOR ('OTA... 75.00 75.1. 50 _rI 1At; MUSIC Li30282 06/01 r ?e06/01/90 2029.50 2029.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- L5n- 435l-1672.3 ANT- 2029.50 DESC-T S-; r T`iRK/a:riFi S "GYPSY" VENDOR TOTAL 2029.50 2029.50 07 EDGEWATER EAST 30283 06/05/90 O:0r/90 iG%J5%9V 201.60 201.60 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-362000 ANT- 201.60 DESC-"EDGEWATER EAST1''COHF-PAUL.EY VENDOR TOTAL 201.60 201.60 19 ALD:S 30284 1051++910 06/05/90 18.02 18.02 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-160000 ANT- :18,.02 DESC-tllCDONALD/Owl DR!• FOR KIDS TOL R VENDOR TOTAL 15.02 13.02 00 U S POSTMASTER 30285 06/06/90 06/06/90 498.64 498.64- ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-330000 ANT- 478.64 4 DE SC-U •`.-; POSTMASTER/POSTAGE VENDOR TOTAL 498.6.4 498.64 GRND TOT1L 74750.51 74750.51 0 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL WI.Ain FROM: STAFF DATE: JUNE 7, 1990 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO GREENFIELD PARK BASEBALL FIELD FENCING The three fencing companies which bid the project at Greenfield baseball field were notified to request confirmation of their original bids including the deduct of the 12 foot right field fence and addition of two 14 foot swing gates for maintenance vehicles. The bids were given as follows: Able Fence $4,551.00 Keller Fence $7,275.00 Century Fence $7,503.00 Able Fence remained the low bid. References were called including the City of Maplewood and St. Paul Parks and Recreation Department. Both references were pleased with their work and provided a good recommendation regarding Able Fences workmanship and commented that they were easy to work with concerning changes. • WARNING TRACK A bid was received from Bryan Rock Products for aggregate limestone for the warning track. The track will be 15 feet wide with twelve feet inside the ballfield and 3 feet extending outside the fence for a maintenance strip. The warning track area is approximately 10,000 square feet with a 4 inch depth of the material. Approximately 253 ton of material is needed at $10.30 per ton delivered or $2,605.90 (10 day payment discount price). The City has been dealing with Bryan ROck because of their quality aggregate limestone. Staff recommends purchase of aggregate limestone for Greenfield Park baseball field for the cost of 2,605.90 for 253 ton at $10.30 per ton delivered (allowing the 10 day payment discount price). TURF IMPROVEMENT Staff has collected individual prices for items involved in re-seeding the outfield of Greenfield baseball field. These prices are: Pulverized black dirt (2 inch depth, • 160 yards @ $9.50/yard delivered) $ 1,520.00 Seed $ 176.40 -2- Fertilizer $ 168.70 Round-Up $ 79.00 Turf soil amendment $ 540.00 Sod infield (2,480 square yards �a $.85/roll delivered $ 2,108.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests Council's approval to award the following bids for improvements to Greenfield Park baseball field: Able Fence for fence expansion $ 4,551.00 Bryan Rock Products for the aggregate limestone warning track $ 2,606.00 Individual items for turf improvement, sum total of $ 4,592.00 10 percent contingency $ 1,121.00 • For a project cost sum of $12,870.00 The above project costs to be funded with $14,000.00 budgeted for Greenfield Park baseball field improvements, fund #100-4360-705-000. MS/SL Attachments • t • 00 FENCE 47.4 • RESIDENTIAL Cffimi: 222 4355 INDUSTRIAL 114 E.ACKER STREET • ST.PAUL,MINN.55117 , S75 FAX TELECOPY RECORD DATE: COMPANY NAME: ,4 !) 7 ?" ' - 3d $ ATTENTION: -R 1J FAX #: 7/4Y Y ... 4f ‘.2 PAGES: (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) • FROM; _ �U`t?r' fit? • FAX � { f12 } - 2-7737 COMMENTS• : • , NUMBER ABLE FENCE INC. FREE ESTIMATES 114 E.ACKER STREET • ST.PAUL, MINN.$5117 DATE SOLD • Office: 222 . 4355 We proposer to sell and inistall a f�G Date `- %{� on Your property in aceorden a with sketch and quantic es listed below. —� WOOD--SB AB PT DE / Gauge Wire Z ,ine Posts v Terrn./5 To- Rail a High' ,pype Name - r e 4 =r e ' q ` Unde rgroutica tt i? +ties 4174 no // C#;«Y A �'Z� t/JE' Al County Cross Streets f TI1J/ 4�i r J/ _..ri { f+ ZaneI/.2 Map Location � � ` . QUANTITY SKETCH `- ' , / / e yr• .. r,7S e /// / 601 .4 .e_ , _ r 16_4' '41 P _ e b 61 fp1,7 1 PQs j 2„ !t .W • �/ r't4 -12 &e W ?/ i e ,4 .- ,,,5-0 n 4 moi? - #:. , / 36 Tax Permit STREET Total -- �_„ We are aatialled with the installation of our fence, ._ By: h TV? Z.:.e I.i(4/171.- . Referral C.J Naw,vspaper 0 Signs 0 Other 0 ACCEPTED: • By; ,-. .. Knuckle up 0 Twist up 0 By: Top rail of tend to: follow ground 0 be level 0 PA E..f Tr,MS S All quocacions subject to conditions beyond our control. C�:staner Billing res., `it Different IFE-A e aSrccs to furnish building permits, property lines and stake fence location. This quotation does not include clearing trees, brash or other obstructions from working arca. SINCE 1917 CENTURY FENCE CO1VIPANY P.O. BOX 100 - FOREST LAKE, MINNESOTA 55025 PHONE (612) 464-7373 • DATE: April 27, 1910NKCFPEXW''CE PROPOSAL TO: Mounds View Park & Rec Dept. S . 2401 Hwy. 10 H Mounds View, MN 55112 P Greenfield Park Attn: Mary Saarion o INSTALLED PREPAID MATERIAL ONLY 'Li F.O.B. Job Site FREIGHT COU FENCE OVERALL STYLE Palisade HEIGHT 6' & 12' LINE POSTS 00 FABRIC 9-2 SELVAGE KK COATING Galv. GATE FRAME -5 :" DESCRIPTION Furnish and Instal: 80 L.F. - 6 ft. high chain link fence complete with top & bottom rail 120 L.F. - 12 ft. high chain link fence complete with top & bottom rail 11 Ea. - Line posts, 1 ft. longer to set 4' • 984 L.F. - Ties, bands for relocation 2 Ea. - 3" o.d. end posts (12' ) 1 Lot - Misc. fittings Lump Sum = $8,240.00 Note: Remove & reinstall 6 ft. fence and backstop. Add new 6 ft. fence, 80 L.F. , and new 12 ft. fence, 120 L.F. , to complete project. Note: Add for 12" x 4" concrete maintenance curb under fence. Add = $6,512.00 TO REVISE THIS QUOTATIO IF NOT ACCEPTED WHIt'30 DAYSWHE RICHT ACCEPTANCE: ''THIS PROPOSAL WHEN ACCEPTED IN WRITING BY PURCHASER AND BY CENTURY FENCE COMPANY'S MAIN OFFICE ':BECOMES:` A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE TWO PARTIES:' THE CONDITIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE ARE MADE A PART OF THIS CONTRACT. TERMS OF PAYMENT: NET CASH UPON RECEIPT OF INVOICE OR AS OTHERWISE STATED HEREIN. BUY•SIGNATURE SUBMITTED BY: 0/Li:LAX- (Li 02-6/Lk..t7/-4_ Charles A. Waldenburg, Sas ager DATE CENTURY FENCE COMPANY SINCE 1917• CENTURY FENCE COMPANY P.O. BOX 100 FOREST LAKE, MINNESOTA 55025 PHONE (612) 464-7373 • DATE: April 27, 1993'-"°` E"""" PROPOSAL TO: Mounds View Park & Rec Dept. S . 2401 Hwy. 10 H Mounds View, MN 55112 P Greenfield Park • Attn: Mary Saarian 0 INSTALLED x PREPAID a' { "'L-I DELIVERY " f ` MATERIAL ONLY .Q F.0 B. Job Site FREIGHT COLLECT L SCHEDULE FENCE OVERALL STYLE Palisade HEIGHT 6' & 12' LINE POSTS A- SPACING 10 SET Driven FABRIC 9-2 SELVAGE KK COATING E:aty_ GATE FRAME TOP RAIL 1-5/8" MIDDLE BOTTOM 1-5/8" DESCRIPTION Furnish and Install: 80 L.F. - 6 ft. high chain link fence complete with top & bottom rail 120 L.F. - 12 ft. high chain link fence Clete with top & bottom rail • 11 Ea. - Line posts, 1 ft. longer to set 4' 984 L.F. - Ties, bands for relocation 2 Ea. - 3" o.d. end posts (12') 1 Lot - Misc. fittings Lump Sum = $8,240.00 Note: gaiove & reinstall 6 ft. fence and backstop. Add new 6 ft. fence, 80 L.F., and new 12 ft. fence, 120 L.F., to clete project. Note: Add for 12R x 4" concrete maintenance curb under fence. Add = $6,512.00 •ESt-"•::E 11-IE R HT TO REVISE THIS Q:'DTI=I IC I IF NOT ACCEPIED *III .4!SJ DAYS ACCEPTANCE: THIS PROPOSAL WHEN ACCEPTED IN WRITING BY PURCHASER AND BY CENTURY FENCE COMPANY'S MAIN:OFFICE ' BECOMES A'CONTRACT 'BETWEEN THE TWO PARTIES. THE CONDITIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE ARE MADE A PART OF THIS CONTRACT. # TE OF PAYMENT: NET CASH UPON RECEIPT OF INVOICE OR AS OTHERWISE STATED HEREIN. BUYill.SIGNATURE SUBMITTED BY: al)LAIL Q L(J Charles A. Waldenburg, er DATE CENTURY FENCE COM ANY P. • Fence Compo 2281 Hampden Avenue P.O. Box 14154 St. Pc . PROPOSAL To: Mrs. Mary Saarion Date: April 25, 1990 City of Moundsview 2401 North Highway 10 Proposal Number: 041665 Moundsview, MN 55112 FOB: Jobsite Regarding: Fence Modifications at Greenfield Park Keller Fence Company, Inc. proposes to furnish and install the following: Remove approximately 930' of 72" high chain link fence with 2 1/2" top and bottom rail with driven line posts. Relocate existing backstop approximately 10' South of present location. Reinstall all 72" material plus an additional 150' • and also install 110' of new 144" chain link mounted on a framework consisting of 2 1/2" line posts with 1 5/8" top, middle and bottom rail. Bleachers will be relocated by owner. FOR THE SUM OF $ 8,130.00 The above quotation is firm for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this proposal. Keller Fence appreciates the opportunity to quote on this project and hope that it merits your favorable review. If you have any questions or need additional information, do not hesitate to call us at the above number. 'ncerel, K ' FENC CO,P„+NY, INC. 1 , S ' . K LLER 111111 • Mary Sarion City of Moundsview Parks Department . FAX - 784-3482 Re . Renovation of athletic field Turf area to be renovated : 77 ,000 sq .ft , Grass area 25,000 sq .ft . Skinned area 1 . Total area should be sprayed with non-selective herbicide called Roundup at the rate of 1 oz . per 1000 sq .ft . 2. Grass area should be slit-seeded with Northrup King Athletic Pro II at the rate of 150 lbs. per acre . Seed should be applied in 2 or 3 directions for better overage . Seeding should be done between the dates of August 10 and September 10 for ideal germination . No seeding should be started after September 15 . 3. A starter fertilizer such as Par E>: 10-1S-22 should be applied at the rate of 50 lbs. per 10 ,000 sq .ft . , and watered in . 4 . A balanced slow-release fertilizer , based on soil reports, should be applied in late fall to enhance root development in fall and help plants get a good start in • the spring . Standard fertilizer for this application is Par Ex 24-4-12 at the rate of 1 l b . N per 1000 sq .ft . or, 50 l b . per 12 ,000 sq .ft . 5. Skinned infield areas should be ammended with Turface Soil Ammendment at 25% of top 4 inches of soil . This will require approximately 1 .1 tons of Turface . This soil ammendment will make the infield not only be more playable in adverse weather conditions, but also safer to play on . Irrigation is going to be necessary to maintain this afield in optimum condition for use and to help in its recovery from extensive use, A complete fertilizer program providing adequate nutrients should be planned and held to with soil sampling every 3 to 5 years to make adjustments in fertilizer program . Total Materials: 1 gallon Roundup ( non-selective ) $ 79 .00 8 bags Par Ex 10-13-22 ( Starter )@$22 .05 $176 .40 7 bags Par Ex 24-4-12 @$24 . 10 $168 .70 ID bags NK Athletic Pro 11 @$90.00 $540 .00 i . / 9 Total 4:964 . 10 • • CONTROLS TRADITIONAL INFIELD PROBLEMS Stabilizer is an organic powder that binds soil together to control soil break down. It helps the natural perculation of moisture thru soil and controls dust and wind and water erosion. Stabilizer is non-toxic and harmless to grass, humans and animals. Stabilizer's ability to control dust will put 'an end to player, fan and neighbor complaints of dust around the ball park. Stabilizer will reduce rutting and powdering of soil, thus keeping your field in good playing condition throughout the days heavy game schedule Minimize the problem of rescheduling games due to wet unplayable fields. Stabilizer has proven to be very effective in drying and stabilizing fields quickly after rains. If saving maintainance time and having the best possible playing fields is your goal, then Stabilizer is the answer. SUnder any playing conditions your field will be more stable and consistant, thus reducing the chance of injury to players. • MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: STAFF • DATE: JUNE 7, 1990 SUBJECT: GREENFIELD PARK BASEBALL FIELD IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL. Staff requests Council's approval of the Greenfield Park baseball field improvement proposal here given. Staff recommends that improvements to Greenfield Park baseball field should be implemented in three phases. After completion of each phase, the preceding phases should be re-evaluated. All costs have been conservative estimates. PHASE I Item Esimated Cost Fencing expansion $9,000.00 Warning track 2,000.00 Re-turfing by slit seeding with topsoil 4,000.00 Sodding infield areas 2,500.00 . Relocate bleachers, level berm 527.00 (in-kind) Relocate pathway 1,000.00 Sprinkling system 14,000.00 Equipment shed 800.00 $33,300.00 Staff recommends that Phase I should be implemented as soon as possible with whatever funding currently available. After items of Phase I are completed, Phase II should be re-evaluated. PHASE II Item Estimated Cost Replacement of backstop $ 4,500.00 Netting 1,500.00 Batting cages (2) 4.500.00 $10,500.00 • On completion of Phase II, the items of Phase III should be re-evaluated. -2- PHASE III • Item Estimated Cost Expansion of right field $26,000.00 Dugouts 6,600.00 Scoreboard/electrical power to field 5.000.00 $37,600.00 The attached park drawings show the current status and proposed improvements, as well as the location of the field in reference to other park facilities. Staff will be in attendance at the agenda meeting to present this proposal before the Council. MS/SL Attachment • • IX ALI L. 0H UJ Do z d P op "Z.A • 1_,Ld 0 >ce <Lao cs 4 4 ‘ F— vMW m7pZaw W ce k----4______% \ F- VA ZZ.J WH \ mw VWQ AU / X>} UdW 6 n j JZA --I JA WIiV r WWZ W.W.p X>•C 3 4 3 4 4'!LQ 1""'4 WPgd' CY A� H 3 H9 4 4 W Wo W Q wy Q Q W 3� _ =o = o- a_3 [L H * 9 1 i ____J \lip +....tarmletmait: 44011r - Z -.1 _' a 11/1 �O u.:::::::M::::::::•:•:'• • • • ••• ••••• r��trt.1.r i,,tKlRit M.,(11.14Hkg11 6f)14fIla r/ �-' u1A1u'r •AV N1VM 'Eaa 1,ua11nuc1om°imolufr 111117102 �(IUtt / �/ 1 0 � 1 1 1 1 Irl 1-- Y 48Ritfiflfttkr141}f( tfllitllattittnUrau -` fij d 1!onnt�ruptitlV�int,lttF<l�i 1' : . M rl 1 hi 2 "end Q - RIAN33e19 • 0 A • , 411111111111111111111111011) r Y v` K h 'S' A'Y ,-: - • A _i 1 Z � \ �r 7. 'rir r•. - .fit°^, `.• .�,,- i t �� _`•t•d -m,-�" r / -is {r .:44€4m . -`F - 4 ye. i•`i Ti�'"� in?,C �= Z ) ___r '''''''-. -4',.'s' r.77:-.--1.77‘,,,,..-- - - '''-,'- - 1 „.,z------..;.... ]f' -..- ",, • ,', ---:5 .,---k I� pr,,' �r 4 �. 1 9 • $'1Y • I A,7 1 S ,�• z r l,1�Er /4 e.,.;•z • r r ! . al[1 G. ,ry Nr' `i r s�k JLnU +� r f BACKSTOPS welded to form overhang on Models NO.4124 Backstop,same as NO.4122 Like all the rest of GameTime's;products,• 3112,3312,4122,and 4124. , II with complete overhang over back these backstops are heavy-duty,easy Cross ties are fabricated of 11/4" panels and wing panels.(shown) to install and built for tough durability. . All overhang alvanized pipe. are 10'x 6: E.DUG-OUT Attractive and practical,these back- • Fence is galvanized 9 gauge. GameTime offers a heavy-duty Dug- stops provide top-notch professional • All panels are 10'wide and 12'high. Out,perfect for any ballfield.The playing capabilities to any field. Dug-Out,easy to construct and install, e six different models give a wide NO.3012 Backstop,one 10'back panel is designed and fabricated for long oice to the community where soft- with one wing panel at each side. life and continuous use.It features ball and baseball are popular All up- NO.3112 Backstop,one 10'back panel uprights and end frames of 21/2"x 11/2" rights are fabricated of 2"galvanized with one 15'center overhang section x 3/I6"square tubing,painted black. steel pipe.Where there are overhangs, with one wing panel at each side. • the 2"pipe is miter cut and welded NO.3312 Same as NO.3012 but with Rafters are 2 1 h„x 3/i6 square tubing. to form the overhangs. complete overhang over back panels • Bench is 14 gauge 13/4"x 9 "x 15 ft. anodized aluminum extrusion with and wing panels. NO. Backstop,two 10'back 2�5 O.D.galvanized legs. D.BACKSTOPS—SIX MODELS panels with one wing panel at each side. • Chain link 9 gauge 2"galvanized OFFERED NO.4122 Backstop,two 10'back mesh. • Uprights are fabricated of 2"stan- panels and two wing sections with two NO.2398 Dug-Out,ground space dard galvanized pipe,miter cut and overhang sections over back panels. 15'x 5: r717:"4 rIlk tl'111 -'.3 .,,,P•11.•,,,N ,1,.•,11.,;; ;:-.=.; _.---",...iiS7' 1M te....."- --.., ;/ �.� •,. . ,;. I • :• .I,•;It. e •,: -. 4::h'` .' ,/ 1. �Q� I•,ti� II.,�� �::• ,:5`. .L, y�{.�...� I i_ _ J.•I •.- .!.• fes%.• li . NO.3012 NO.3312 NO.4122 3 panels only, 12'high. 3 panels,3 overhangs,15'high. 4 panels,2 overhangs, 15'high. 410 •�`+'/ �' �. R^' .+. /fir, '4:�y %� � :/ ����•,�,. ...,,... iy,„„.,,.,:::, .„4„,.....„,,,� • % ..„0,,,,,... 1..„.„:,.... ,,.‘,,,..,„ , fa ,./ . i. ,,,,.,,, .:.,.,..„,..;,.., -„, 1,,.,......,,....__.„ , ........„ .,,,,....„..-, NO.3112 NO.4120 NO.4124 3 panels,one overhang, 15'high. 4 panels only, 12'high. 4 panels,4 overhangs, 15'high. I • • _,_.- _ �O�L .f. O F1‘`9 1 • • r„` • • > O` 0 m ai ' vi . v m (;),..:•_... c.... E O ala. ' o.0� L N O Ct-C p O �_ U y 3C7 �, p v� _m O U) as*E acn '2cn 0 c 3'2 N� mm W o ......+ U m 0--° Nao EL.2O C m m 0 '- p_ O `• c W U7 7 X N CC cc 2 = r_L•)'O Ro. ,= o O .� c.)4. .0 0..6 N.f.1..)CD $v wOO .4 O•� dm= 'ad = . �L N UU O _O)X m- 2 L U viN O 00LL 0c. E7 O 8 c.i m�m `rn m a U m _ ,.. 0-U . m o mE L >. 3pLm— ocy.c >o0000X 00 _ c°iornyUom °) �° = aUmco • )oonoo = M3 mm C/3 0 � 0s s ' � o5� EMm_i0Li; Emmaov�c� a2ru) o ` 6 as (1)'-1:3a) ca � CD'O .c m U : 0.D 0)0 a L QJ y amoo� c L U O XL N U) c m als O_O N co o C L X p 0 O a..0m 0N • i i - N LULOpa3 `aot2 co.CO ia O o o m= g,.0 y�v ccul R.yaspaE pamEE Lm � Y _ m_ p o p 1:0)CI ca.0 CL , 0c7F' ° tu � ' OQ • .0 U ru 0 . 7 a) 0 1 0) to m (.2.3 11.1 7Rpmm0 = m =•N a,,at = O" wy� OaLaE.ofON « Y c a1 m y m mn«. 0Z - F"L' O8.0- 0a0 (/ 50 oaa2OU) mOcr � 27)-a z °302yN.2aS >,�•c E E . aO.0H 0 Ete 0p ' 0 m # , 8 w� = m al m m 0 p O' E r o ••�� 03 m a) 8c0` 0 - (.) M— �� m = aS U_y= O p O CPZW , ap = •m Em Co cm m m= c 1 c 0 > �:.. ? CA wc�a �� Q Em • GDS.....i CM vo 2� rnocn � 5 03 2 cL= >,U cn W i •` c � p iii yc —.— RfZ' ,_ = ° cu wo o22:n-2 =ot o � ia)pUm � NC _ ' TJ lima c r-' i) E E m'='> o >, O s W • y _ mLm CO=• IMS my pomcOUE e i • = o m�•CUmCnO' ; ~1 ice' — MF »I44cm03m in . = CZ o o.2 c. — � cnca as C - 11411444"SMNj. • S ` m cr c• rr.d o c'• a = • US ( a 0..... _ 1::3 _a) 0 ''' CD �r a)-012 rn y;o ?' lid N•NM m� M 5.m ca c t 5 a- .�.••. = Y = �C= E- c n 3 imi =` c m Lp >,ED > f .. �_ —••- m CION m y o)L O.0 v _ W L n v m 2 15 a m • R ei i �, Ma) c =LLImQ _- I 8 Q bind N�NN �1 = • Q 00 N O== y > Eo = mi 8 $ ON 111 .M411" Q C3 A. cc) cOpo) m Q'• yin E '- =LOO —0 a) yic- ioiLm • MCC13 a) E.N« mZco a .ca'5 m �'> E a,�.-��.Fic".S`...:- > -- «. �' ` -'• _ - Oa a o >, ..p u) E N - O c - ..d LoE= 0 ` m Np `�aoC mma ECm60mEE cov °L ( C >`� Or"m $ c ,m c= - 0 mmCUmd .- clOEII'E•,ro - ma : OXI(Pti 4?e . RESOLUTION NO. 3043 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AMENDING 1990 GENERAL FUND BUDGET WHEREAS, the 1990 Session of the Minnesota Legislature implemented reductions in Local Government Aid (LGA) to cities in order to balance the State budget; and WHEREAS, it is estimated that the impact of this action on the City of Mounds View will be a $31,159 reduction in LGA revenue which was previously certified by the State and included in the 1990 General Fund Budget; and WHEREAS, in order to maintain a balanced 1990 General Fund Budget as required by the Home Rule Charter, it is necessary to reduce both revenues and expenditures. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following expenditures and revenue reductions are made to the 1990 General Fund Budget. • Revenues - Local Government Aids Account No. 100-3221 reduce by $31,159 Expenditures - Finance Department, Account No. 100-4150-703 reduce by $1,500 City Hall, Account No. 100-4190-303 reduce by $20,000 City Hall, Account No. 100-4190-480 reduce by $10,000 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Total Revenues and expenditures for the 1990 Budget are revised to $2,679,864 . Adopted this 11th day of June, 1990 . ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator 411 • ARTICLE XIX. CLOTHING. The CITY will provide each EMPLOYEE with one (1) winter jacket every two (2) years. The winter jacket is to be cleaned and kept in repair by the employee. ARTICLE XX. STANDBY DUTY. 20.1 EMPLOYEES assigned standby duty for a seven (7) day period shall be compensated at the rate of 4 hours of overtime. When a holiday falls within the seven (7) day period, an additional two hours at overtime rate shall be paid. Such standby pay shall be in addition to other compensation the EMPLOYEE is entitled to under this AGREEMENT including call back pay should the EMPLOYEE be required to return to the City to perform emergency work. 20.2 Standby duty will be made available to employees on a voluntary basis. Employees wishing to be assigned standby duty shall indicate their interest on a list maintained by the CITY. 20.3 The EMPLOYEE on standby duty shall first be offered overtime for which he is qualified. If it is refused, it shall be offered to other employees in accordance with Article 8.2 of this AGREEMENT. 20.4 In further consideration of standby duty, the CITY shall provide each EMPLOYEE assigned standby duty with 1 floating holiday per year. The floating holiday may be taken at a time of the employee's choosing with the approval of the employee's supervisor. In addition, the CITY shall furnish a vehicle for the EMPLOYEE to take home at his choosing during the period of standby duty. • 9 • ARTICLE XXI. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS. • 21.1 The CITY will design a performance review form with the input of the EMPLOYEES. 21.2 The CITY will perform a performance review on an annual basis to help guide the employee in areas which need to be more fully developed and to determine the job level to which the employee will be assigned for the next fiscal year. 21.3 Performance reviews will be prepared by the Public Works Foreman and are appealable only to the Public Works Director. ARTICLE XXII. JOB CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM. 22.1 A 4 level job classification system designated as Levels A, B, C and D will be used to classify employees and establish wages. The requirements of the 4 Levels are as follows, ID 22.1.1 Public Services Worker - Level A Requirements High School Diploma GED, or equivalent. Valid Minnesota Class C Driver's License. Successful completion of City's physical examination. Ability to meet the physical demands of the job; including, but not limited to, lifting, bending, climbing, reaching overhead, pushing, and pulling with out restriction. Ability to read, understand, and follow written and oral instructions including safety rules. 10 • • Ability to perform job responsibilities in climatic extremes. Ability to perform routine repair and maintenance tasks in the following sections: Streets, Parks, Building Maintenance, Sewer, Water, & Vehicle Maintenance 22.1.2 Public Services Worker - Level B Requirements Meet or exceed all Level A requirements. Successful completion of one or more years of relevant experience. Possession of valid Minnesota Commercial Driver's license plus endorsements required by the CITY. For current Level A employees, the following areas IPmust be satisfactory on the most recent performance review: (For new employees coming in at Level B these areas will be judged by their references in relevant work experiences) Safe work practices and safe driving record. Adherence to tardiness and sick leave policies. Ability to deal effectively and tactfully with the public. Ability to work with a minimum of on-site supervision. Working knowledge of job fundamentals. • 11 Adherence to all City policies and • procedures. 22.1.3 Public Service Worker - LEVEL C Requirements Meet or exceed all Level B requirements. Successful completion of 3 or more years of relevant experience. For employees with primary responsibility in the indicated area, the following license/certificate will be required. All areas - Successful completion of a certified heavy equipment training program or equivalent training and experience. Water - Class D Water Supply System Operator's Certificate • Sewer - Class D Waste Water Operator's Certificate Mechanic - Certification of successful completion of training in brakes, alignments, transmissions and driveline components, and vehicle electrical systems; and demonstrated proficiency in welding. Streets - City certification in snow plowing, street patching, and demonstrated proficiency in both. Parks - Basic proficiency in carpentry and plumbing demonstrated on the job to the satisfaction of the Public Works Foreman. 12 • For current Level B employees, the following areas must be satisfactory on the most recent performance review: (For new employees coming in at Level C these areas will be judged by their references in relevant work experiences) Knowledge of all operations, preventive maintenance, and routine repairs of equipment operated or assigned to operate. Knowledge of methods and materials used in their areas of responsibility. Ability to work without direct on-site supervision and to make on-site decisions related to work assignments. 22.1.4 Public Service Worker - Level D Requirements 410 Meet or exceed all requirements of Level C. Successful completion of 5 years of relevant work experience. For employees with primary responsibility in the indicated area, or temporarily assigned to an area and in responsible charge, the following license/ certificates will be required: Water - Class B Water Supply System Operator's Certificate Mechanic - Certification in computerized and electronic components, hydraulic systems, and completed training in propane fuel systems. • 13 Parks - Minnesota Non-Commercial Herbicide/Pesticide Applicator License/ • Certificate and completion of liability training in parks operations (LMC Safety and Loss Control Workshop). Streets - Certification of completion of training in MMUTCD signing and striping practices, successful completion (passing grades) in Public Works classes (materials and engineering) at North Hennepin Community College or similar institution, and completion of liability training for public works operations (LMC Safety and Loss Control Workshop) Sewer - Certification of completion of training MMUTCD signing and striping practices, successful completion (passing grades) in Public Works classes (materials • and engineering) at North Hennepin Community College or similar institution, and completion of liability training for public works operations (LMC Safety and Loss Control Workshop) Multiple Areas - Employees who meet the requirements for Level C classification in 3 or more areas. Employees achieving Level D Classification for skill in multiple areas must make substantial effort on an annual basis to receive the training and achieve required licensing for Level D in the area to which they are primarily assigned. 14 • . For Level C employees, the following areas must be satisfactory on the most recent performance review in order to be classified as Level D. Ability to lead a work crew. Ability to assist in scheduling other employees, materials, equipment and activities. Ability to assist in training of other employees. Knowledge of operations in all departments. Ability to assume supervisory duties in the absence of the Public Works Foreman. Ability to respond to and resolve complaints . effectively. ARTICLE XXII. WAGES. 23.1 The following wage schedule will be in effect from the first payroll period in 1990 through the last payroll period in 1990. LEVEL A $ 9.62 per hour LEVEL B $ 11.29 per hour LEVEL C $ 13.08 per hour LEVEL D $ 13.34 per hour 23.2 An EMPLOYEE classified in Levels B through D will receive wages listed for that level regardless of the area to which they • 15 are assigned, but will receive no less than the level to which they are classified. • ARTICLE XXIV. INTERMIYFENT LEAD WORKER 24.1 Under certain circumstances, the Public Works Foreman may determine the need for a Lead Worker to be in charge of a work crew. This determination will be made at the discretion of the Public Works Foreman and may be based on the complexity of a task, the number of workers involved, the experience level of the workers assigned, or a combination of these factors. The determination of the Public Works Foreman is final and not grievable. 24.2 The CITY will maintain a sign-up list for those EMPLOYEES who is to be considered for Lead Worker assignments. Selections for Lead Workers will be made from this list in accordance with the Public Works Foreman's determinations of the best qualifications. There will be no attempt to equalize distribution of Lead Worker selections. IP 24.3 To be eligible on the sign-up list an employee must be classified as a Public Services Worker - Level D. Selections will be only for those areas in which the individual is classified. 23.4 The Lead Worker will receive a pay differential of $0.45 per hour while assigned as the Lead Worker. ARTICLE XXV. DURATION. This AGREEMENT shall be effective as of January 1, 1990 and shall remain in full force and effect until December 31, 1990. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT on this day of , 1990. 16 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW: Mayor Clerk-Administrator EMPLOYEES: )40 1.14 obtrak Steve D. Dazenski 04ez _r_Ziate_Lii4,Lawrence Decheine . William G.Hanggi -eg.2A - illiam G. Hanson • /_. • _ 4 ‘ _114G Gary G. Kardell Gl/a1 , 4)ez=.40,7Wallace R. Mortenson �, ,01b \moi%_ - _ Timothy J. Pittman IA/i • Pr / 0 4 / 'chard A. Schmidlin • 1 I 13 C � ,�,c. Jeffrey Wienke • 17 MEMORANDUM Memo To: Mayor and Council Members From Ric Minetor, City Engineer/Director of Public Works Date June 14, 1990 Subject: Proposed Agreement for County Road J Reconstruction The attached proposed Cooperative Agreement # 90022 is for the reconstruction of County Road J (exclusive of the Knollwood to Xylite segment) . This is the Ramsey County project previously discussed and approved by the Council. The agreement documents the basis for City participation, the estimated costs of the project, and the estimated City share of these costs. I have reviewed the draft agreement and recommend Council's approval. The final agreement may have minor changes in the cost estimates. I recommend that Council approve the draft agreement. • • PI/ill Agreement 90022 • RAMSEY COUNTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH MOUNDS VIEW Agreement between 47429 S.A.P. 62-601-04 the County of Ramsey S.A.P. 02-632-06 and the City of Mounds View S .A.P. 146-020-04 Re: County Road J (CSAH 1 ) Estimated Amount Receivable: T.H. 65 TO I-35W Reconstruction From a point approximately MSA Funds 1500 feet west of the N.W. Roadway Z 7 016 corner of Section 6 , Storm Sewer T 30 N, R 23 W to a point Total fid'-1/ , approximately 53 . 5 feet east C� of the N.E. corner of Section 4 , T 30 N, R 23 W. THIS AGREEMENT, by and between City of Mounds View, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City, " and Ramsey County, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County" ; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County and the City desire to construct and rebuild County Road J ( County State Aid Highway 1 ) from a point approximately 1500 feet west of the Northwest Corner of Section 6, T 30 N, R 23 W to a point approximately 53 . 5 feet east to the Northeast Corner of Section 4 , T 30 N, R 23 W; and WHEREAS, that portion of County Road J lying north of the section lines is in Anoka County; and WHEREAS, that portion of County Road J lying sou e section line from the West County Line to Coral Sea Street Northwest is in the City and the County; and WHEREAS, the County has a separate agreement with Anoka County for that portion of the work . in Anoka County; and WHEREAS, the County has a separate agreement with the City of Blaine for that portion of the work in Blaine ; and WHEREAS, this road project has been designated by the Minnesota Department of Transportation as eligible for certain construction costs reimbursement from the County State Aid Highway funds for work in the County and identified as S .A.P. 62-601-04 ; and • 90022-1 WHEREAS, this road project had been designated by the Minnesota Department of Transportation as eligible for certain construction costs reimbursement from the Municipal State Aid Highway funds and identified as S .A.P. 146-020-04 ; and WHEREAS, plans for this project S.A.P. 62-601-04 , S.A.P. 146-020-04 showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades and cross sections for the improvement of County State Aid Highway 1 with the limits of the City as a County State Aid Highway have been presented to the City; and WHEREAS, the project includes, in addition to other things, grading, concrete curb and gutters, storm sewer, and City utility adjustments, and/or improvements; and WHEREAS, the grading provisions require acquisition of certain right of way and temporary construction and slope easements prior to construction; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has determined allowable credit for storm sewer outfall lines previously constructed prior to the project, and that 78 .99% of this storm sewer system is eligible for a combination of State Aid Highway funds as present in D.V. Halvorson, Mn/DOT Hydraulics Engineer , office 41, memorandum dated February 16 , 1990; and WHEREAS, said hydraulics memorandum identifies 7 .86% as the City share of the storm sewer cost; and WHEREAS , the design and plan preparation by the consulting firm BRW, Inc. was performed under a separate agreement with the County; and WHEREAS, the City and County will participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of this segment of County Road J as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1 . The County shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, the necessary plans , specifications and proposals, take bids, and with concurrence of the City, award a contract for the construction of this project, S .A.P. 62-601-04 , the County shall perform the construction inspection. The County shall maintain adequate records and assist the City in obtaining cost reimbursement of its cost items identified under project S.A.P. 146-020-04 . 2. The City shall acquire and pay for all rights of way and easements required for the construction of the project in the County 0 within the City. 90022-2 3 . All County Road J rights of way and temporary easements • acquired by the City in the County will be in the name of the County, and parking and other regulations will be controlled by the County. Any rights of way which cannot be negotiated will be acquired through eminent domain proceedings and thereafter assigned by the City to the County. 4 . The storm sewer system in the County as shown in the plans and specifications is eligible for 39 .28% reimbursement by the County State Aid Highway funds based on the Minnesota Department of Transportation Hydraulics Memorandum and this portion shall be paid by the County. 5 . The storm sewer system as shown in the plans and specifications is eligible for 7 .86% reimbursement by Municipal State Highway funds based on the Minnesota Department of Transportation Hydraulics Memorandum and this portion shall be paid to the County by the City. 6 . Upon completion of the project the County shall own and maintain the storm sewer catch basins and leads and the City shall own and maintain the storm sewer trunk lines, ponds, ditches and laterals within the City servicing property outside the road right of way. 7 . Any existing City utility modifications and or adjustments which are necessitated by the roadway construction, as shown in the . plans and specifications, shall be paid for by the County if eligible for reimbursement through its County State Aid Highway funds. 8 . The City shall pay to the County 100% of the cost of City utility extensions or improvements. 9 . The City shall pay 75% of the cost of concrete curb and gutters constructed in the County within the City except for medians or replacement of existing concrete curb and gutters . 1 . Any i. y impro - 1 - _ . . _ . . the plans and specifications may be incorporated in the construction contract by supplemental agreement approved by the City and shall be paid for as specified in the supplemental agreement. 11 . The City shall pay 10% of its share of the construction cost as determined by the contract as awarded, to the County as a preliminary engineering fee. This fee shall be due upon award of the construction contract. This fee is in addition to and not in lieu of the 8% fee identified in paragraph 12 of this agreement. 12 . The City shall pay 8% of its share of the construction cost, as determined by the final contract amounts , to the County as a construction engineering fee . This fee shall be due upon notification to the City of the final amounts of the contract. • 90022-3 1 . . 111 13 . The City shall not assess or otherwise recover any portion of its cost for this project through levy on County-owned property. 14 . Attached is a preliminary construction cost estimate form which lists all of the anticipated cost grouped atnd attheir s sstimated quantities and costs. For convenience , qtP of the construction costs 'of the various aspects of the project have been shown. 15 . Attached is a preliminary cost participation breakdown demonstrating the method of calculation and identifying the City estimated costs for the project. City 16 . It is estimated, for accounting purposes, that the y share of the costs of the construction plus en paymentineerigcost e , to the County is the total sum of >041 ' 3 awa , prepared Tnhedhe Cctytyshl a when a construction contract is propode'd to revised cost participation breakdown based on construction coact unit prices and submit a copy to the City. The City agrees advance to the County an amount equal to 100% of its share of the total construction cost share plus preliminary engineer_' as set forth be it more or less than the estimated sum o#1 work . The County may then authorize the contractor to commence 17 . Upon substantial completion of the work, the County shall prepare a revised cost participation breakdown based upon the • contract unit prices and the actual units of work estimated to have been performed and submit a copy to the hCit . sThele cobenstruction engineering costs to be paid the County by Y this revised final construction costs. The County shall add to the City' s estimated final construction costs the preliminary engineering and construction engineering costs due from the City, make necessary adjustments for liquidated damages, if any, and Tdeductyt Citrefunds s previously advanced for the project by the City. pay to the County any amounts due. In the event the calculations show that the City has advanced funds in greater amount than is due he Count , the County shall refund the amount .to theeCity wwiithout interest. Al monies p. • • • project will be returned within a reasonable time not to exceed two ( 2) years from deposit. 18 . Preliminary plans reviewed at the public hearing and final plans and specifications are hereby in all things approved. • 90022-4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be 411 executed. In presence of CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA By: Its: By: Its: Date: THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY Recommended for approval : Kenneth E. Weltzin, P.E. Director, Ramsey County Public Works Department By: Hal Norgard, Chairperson Board of County Commissioners Approved as to Form: Attest: By: By: Assistant County Attorney Chief Clerk—County Board Date : Date : • 90022-5 • • I I O .. M4'Q8 413 ppS *4 0b ti 2 O o N M N M N N14. COO.4 0 rO.' 43a.O0 a M 0 00M00 M NM MM N M Ea— y00 a N NMM NM N O ! M N M b b r! M �► wor M M J • i b • N. Sr ...•W ri O � r1 WbN y3 to N O..►ti .q OH 444 "I NMO tg 3C cn 34.O G bVjO O O .rN . a Oi H O N O 0O H ^ 1y CP Ni WIf.,) 1 W D M O 0 w v O O (41 • _ M MI 0. Y B O m O If. MO O M • us0 41 N E M O• N p u, onC.044 2NHOO4 ~"4 M N r e!p "..4 c4 IR N f O O0.C23C P. y O O O p. O 2 Pf ti�' - N O O C �m .- H N iN n • . 0 e4 {q N f l .•l��y] ! O NZ NZ • C. Cr O :d w HO• Qe� � :1 igi �e .nn .4N 0• e NE $ oG N �N O 0 HO 4.4.• o 9 c 0 0 .410 40 i 10 C a a 0 °° • 0.1 • p 8 8888 8.8 888 8228888888 2828 8 8 8 8588 8 8 888 68 $ tiNg$ .n.3 I!�.i O ONrSS.Fi 5's r�N .O-. 440..... .4 H go CR il n 2 VC 2 0... 14 N •.y H f N {0V O T.—i 90 O M I �tyyi{yyq pyy� 1�.� �.y O�p Fr. �p r o i S 1 + ►.• ..i ..i N N . ►1..i ==z M n M ease . 9 H HF.M H S ff == •0 v r ys 1 1 1 1 N Y !!: P. 0.4 Um w 1 4 m V 04o VJ W od. N N i Fa 1mpps .. N h1IIhE Ilil 5g�p0 WI 882 04 44 1,4 0 93II :4:4 G» Y 0.&ati 10 p lard bmp1 (�qp pyy r �"� �t'J! ►W�• ►pr.p• :ya �.. N M Gid 0 lC a P•. W 9999999999 lta ii t�7 ."n H E H M 0 N 4.i0 C • b68 ' OES ' t$ 9ZE ' L6Z't$ (%,8Z' 6£ ) tZ6'tSt$ Ltb ` OL ZbL' Ot SL9' 6S saMag w oqS 60-t09-Z9 99S ' t8V 6S6 ' EL LOt'806 poi • 8£6 ' tb L6£ ' 9 ItS 'SE ITEM (%98' L) 1Z6 'tSmSolS 009'EZ PO-OZO-917t Maty spunoW 960'bt $ -0- ( 0 ) 1Z6' tSt ££9 ' 9t $ L£S 'Z $ iaMaS m201S 960 ' bt $ E0-0Z0-90t autetg A,LNnoo A SWY 1 06Z ' OZ6$ L06' 6LL$ III 90E' 08 8L- 6 L ' 6T $5t ' Et autetg t9L' b6 SSV 6t SZE '09 %1L' 6E exouY 1Z6' tSt$ 33M9S WIOIS £L8 ' 08L 9tt '6tt LSL' t99 EOo 9Zt 90-Z£9-ZO SEZ 90-ZE9-ZO peog P6L' L Z0-0Z0-£9t 8£t ' 6 bb£ ' t xiea axe' 6updS 8t5 'S£ $ Stb 'S $ OOt ' OE $ 9SE Z E0-0Z0-90t bbL' L $ autetg Ammo YMONY teloy %8t @ 71S buTIaautbu2 •31suo0 • . 06/tZ/E PaleP alemtlsg saaautbu2 uo paseq III MSE-i 01 59 'WI :- r ;mg Aquno0 AWKWWnS NOI xaioiaama S,SOo 4 ' • 1.4�51 us�� gs € fi ssgs$ �St St s $ � M� M» .4»» Oa N MOMN N aM NMr►M MM M NNMMMN M NM MNM » M M o .4.K O N Yf N 6.1.4 00 N 0ft 42 4f N A .ti N ti 40 Ge•10 NNNft St rol Mw. H of. ..... fNtl .4 U4 wyy 02 ~N of.40o CO Q.r 1 0 e • tl N m .N NNN N 0401 NOod N~ .4.4 N' UlO 40 UN Nmb ^ N 5tl O rN -4 NNtia 0,b•4 N 01 a N O IA 001 OS b ah dNf0 maN 0. ..A 0 tlUI N p N F 40 04 A O N O •=e 88828 222sagaaaaas as S a a�ss a a a as as Sp 42 41 NNp 8"_C.4fp oIf F N.4 a OaaCa ,SN N 4 N On a N CO a en•f a Q a.,IftiN li s a ~ •i N .4 �f SiwO ffO ! • H.4= N.. •• •4 Nm OD(y x. 0iaO40b" $ 40 :E..44 N N N 42 14 NNfyMpp T b 42 .. N CO .. o 0f7 of • :3 .4 en tl Ir.. N N WI;�.. .+ wa . • •ff 01 44 CtCCC C / C C C k C C ® t3® �� C., a= ��=== II aaaaaaraaaa as 6 2 5-Sa 3 5 a =a as ..-= ati s11 11 ro SI C4 !!:4 to to ts to to c.toesEcla ill 1 N. or tot a' I V Y 0 M 0.f .. q i1 b P Xi,n 40 0r�py0 _N y� ~ .4 t; 11 ii y 00i i Se O y t aH Ca f.i M y `+11111 li � ,,,, daE� k1P Cts On 1.0 MI 11-1 8 oh ..Cb assE �M 0_ 222u2 6 S 0 S SUaI k Gi S a 6 1 i s N1. 9 rd..err ••• 0 • • • 0 0 4 u ti g8 n owlgWs Eil 0 NN M v r C b . 8 Q • 0 SN 1 a - 1003 M M Q 0 O �\ 4. O O d O 0 • ti \y y0*M 4 • o Q a MDO 0 O V lel 0 440 O 1�/r0 0 t0WS ^° 0 FAO 0 61 r. H O �• M0 O1 •. tv ea we o T r • 8 4 O •MI. r I 03 .moi• • . Oa N w b 0 r M II trlH 8 U ..Y g 8 0 • 0e PO 0 0 ae • 0 rt m o ]O , • 0 f� _,A2,1/1,-- !II MEMORANDUM Memo To: Mayor and Council Members From Ric Minetor, City Engineer/Director of Public Works 7e$1101:nelk-- Date June 14, 1990 Subject: Resolution for No Parking on Reconstructed County Road J The approved plans for County Road J reconstruction make no provision for parking on the road. Ramsey County has requested that the City Council adopt a resolution requesting the County to restrict parking along the south side of County Road J. I recommend Council adopt the attached resolution. • RESOLUTION NO. 3046 A Resolution Requesting Ramsey County to Restrict Parking Along a Portion of County Road J WHEREAS, Ramsey County has planned the improvement of County Road J (CSAH 1) from T. H. 65 to 1-35W; and WHEREAS, Ramsey County will be expending County State Aid Highway funds (S.A.P. 62-601-04) on the improvement of said street; and WHEREAS , said improvement does not conform to the approved minimum standards as previously adopted for such County State Aid streets and that approval of the proposed construction as a County State Aid street project must, therefore, be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions; and WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions , that would be a necessary prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a County State Aid project in the City, has been determined. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Mounds View • requests Ramsey County to restrict the parking of motor vehicles on the south side of County Road J from the west County Line to Coral Sea Street. 411 UP-'414 411 MEMORANDUM Memo To :Mayor and Council Members From :Ric Minetor, City En•ineer/Director of Public Works Date :June 14, 1990 Subject :Treatment Plant Building Options We have been reviewing the layout of the proposed new treatment equipment in treatment plant #1. We have found that a new State Fire Marshal regulation requires air scrubbers on the chemical rooms . This regulation makes it difficult to arrange the equipment within the existing building. The suggestion was made to consider the possibility of constructing a new building adjacent to well 3 (on the corner of Bronson and Edgewood) and abandon the existing building upon completion of the new treatment plant. This would then allow the existing building to be utilized for expansion of City Hall. The existing building would need remodeling, but approximately 2500 square feet of space would be available for City Hall • expansion. This space could be utilized in many ways , but probably would not preclude an addition for the police department. The estimated cost of a new building for treatment plant #1 is $350,000. This is a very rough estimate and is based only on doubling the current square footage and utilizing similar construction (brick and masonry construction) . The scrubber requirement may add as much as $100,000 to the original cost estimate for remodeling the existing building. Staff is requesting council direction on whether to further study . . continue with this option, a preliminary floor plan and cost estimate could be developed by Short-Elliott-Hendrickson and the space needs consultant could review probable uses for this area. 111 TO: Mayor & Council `4 FROM: Don Brager, Finance Director - Treasurer 110 DATE: June 13, 1990 SUBJECT: Revised Purchasing Policy One of the ideas that originated with the Council - Staff team building sessions was that Council would entertain ideas from Staff to ease administrative constraints. An area that would make Staff's job a little easier to perform is purchasing policy. It seems redundant for Staff to request approval for purchases of items which Council has already approved by adopting the annual budget. It is Staff's feeling that if an item has been included in the budget and the cost of that item is under $15,000.00 (if an item is over $15, 000. 00 State laws require advertising for bids and award of the purchase by Council) an approval from Council is unnecessary since the item was previously approved when the budget was adopted. Attached is a draft of a proposed revision to the City's purchasing policy. The policy proposes the following: 1) Purchases under $1, 000. 00 may be authorized by the head of the department for whichh the expenditure has been budgeted. Quotations are encouraged but not required. 2) Purchases from $1, 000.00 to $5, 000.00 may be authorized by the department head after obtaining two or more written or verbal quotations for items that have been specifically included in the budget. 3) Purchases from $5, 000.00 to $15, 000.00 may be authorized by the Clerk - Adminstrator or the Finance Director after the department head has obtained two or more written or verbal quotations for items which have been specifically included in the budget. Items which were not specifically included in the budget would be approved or disapproved by Council as has been past practice. Present policy requires Council approval for purchases that exceed $2,500. 00 whether they have been included in the budget or not. Attached is a memo from Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works, which requests a modification to the purchasing policy regarding change orders. Ric proposes that the department head in charge of the project be given authorization to sign change orders up to the amount of contingency that has been approved in the contract which would have been rpeviously approved by Council. Staff seeks Council's direction on these matters. v- MEMORANDUM -411 Memo To :Mayor and Council Members From :Ric Minetor, City Engineer/Director of Public Works Date :June 13, 1990 leL47-i4445414A: Subject :Purchasing Policy - Change Orders The Council has been approving contracts with a contingency amount for unforeseen problems, contract item overruns, and other items that are not apparent at the time of the bid. In reviewing the purchasing policy of the City, we have noticed that there is no reference to this practice. Therefore I am recommending adding the following section to the purchasing policy. Add the following to section 2.02: When bids are awarded with a contingency reserve, the Department Head in charge of the project, or the Clerk Administrator, shall have the authority to sign change orders for the City up to the value authorized in the motion awarding the bid. • S PURCHASING POLICY 411 1 . 01 ESTABLISHING AUTHORITY The purchasing policies of the City of Mounds View are established by the City Charter, the City Code, and the City Council . 1 . 02 POLICY a) Purchases to meet the requirements of all departments of the City are made by the appropriate department heads by purchase order pursuant to the policy set forth below. b) The City Council declares its intention to purchase competitively without prejudice and to seek the maximum value for every dollar expended. 1 . 03 PURPOSE OF THIS POLICY This policy is designed to set forth, in detail , the poli- cies and procedures necessary to facilitate the purchasing operation of the City. • 1 .04 RELATIONS WITH SUPPLIER'S REPRESENTATIVES a) Departments should not be burdened with, nor encourage visits from supplier's representatives except where it is to obtain a quotation for goods or services. b) Every opportunity shall be made to encourage respon- sible suppliers to do business with the City. c) All employees of the City shall keep themselves free of obligation to any of the City' s suppliers. BIDDING AND QUOTATIONS 2.01 Competitive bids or quotations shall be solicited in con- nection with all purchases whenever possible. Purchases shall be made from the lowest responsible bidder complying with specifications and other stipulated bidding condi- tions. The following requirements shall apply: a) Purchases over $15 ,000. If the amount of the purchase is estimated to exceed $15,000 , sealed bids shall be solicited through advertisement in the manner and subject to the requirements of law governing purchases by the municipality. All purchases under this section 110 shall be awarded by the Council. • Purchasing Policy Page Two i b) Pereheses-frem-$187888-to-$15788(4.---if-the-emeent-ef--- the-psrehese- s-estmated-te-exeeed-$18;8887-but-net--- te-exeeed-$157888;-the-psrehese-may-be-made-either-by-- edvertisenent-end-the-reeeipt-ef-seeled-bids7-er-by---- ebtening-twe-er-mere-wrtten-gsetetlens-frem-supplers et-the-dlseretlen-ef-the-Elty-Eeeneii---The-psrehese--- shell-be-ewerded-by-the-Eity-Eeenell- b) Purchase from $5,000 to $15,000. If the amount of the purchase is estimated to exceed $5,000, but not to exceed $15,000, the purchase may be made only after obtaining two or more written or verbal quotations (if verbal quotations are obtained they shall be recorded) from suppliers and the purchase shall be authorized by the Clerk-Administrator if the item has been specific- ally identified in the current year's adopted budget. If not in the current year's budget the purchase shall be awarded by the City Council. c) Pereheses-frem-$8,588-te-$187888.---If-the-emesnt-ef-the perehese-is-estimated-te-exeeed-$8;588;-but-net-te exeeed-$18-8887-the-psrehese-may-be-made-enly-after---- ebtelning-twe-er-mere-written-guetetiens-frem-suppliers end-the-perehese-shell-be-ewerded-by-the-Eity-Eeeneii- c) Purchase from $1,000 to $5,000. If the amount of the pu e is estimated to exceed $1,000, but not to exceed 2,700, the purchase may be made only after S o 0 0. obtaining two or more written or verbal quotations (if verbal quotations are obtained they shall be recorded) from suppliers. The purchase may be authorized by the head of the department for which the expenditure has been specifically identified in the current year's budget. If the item to be purchased is not specific- ally identified in the current year's budget the -purchase shall be awarded by the Council. d) Pereheses-frem-$17888-te-$87588.--lf-the-emesnt-ef-the-- parehase-#s-estimated-te-exeeed-$178887-but-net-te exeeed-$8,5887-the-perehese-may-be-made-enly-after ebtelning-twe-er-mere-written-er-verbal-geetetiens-flf- verbel-gsetetlens-ere-ebtelned-they-shell-be-reeerded-- end-etteehed-te-the-perehese-ender-lsssed}-frem suppliers-end-the-perehese-shell-be-eutherlred-by-the-- Elerk-Administreter-if-the-item-hes-been-speelfleeily-- ldentifled- n-the-eurrent-yeerls-adapted-budget-er-lf-- net-ln-the-esrrent-yeerls-budget-the-perehese-shell-be- ewerded-by-the-Elty-Eeenell- S d) Purchase under $1,000. If the amounat of the purchase • is estimated to be under $1,000, quotations are encouraged but not required. The purchase shall be authorized by the head of the department for which the expenditure has been budgeted. ei.--Pttreheses-ander-$+;686--if-the-emeunt-ef-the-pttrehese-- is-esttmeted-te-be-under-$+;866--gttetetiens-ere eneettreged-batt-net-regtt.ired7--The-pttrehese-mey-be anther±reed-by-the-heed-ef-the-department-far-whi.eh the-expenc4tare-hes-been-budgeted7- 2. 02 FORMAL BIDS All purchases which require advertisement and the receipt of sealed bids shall be awarded by the City Council . 2. 03 STATEMENT OF GENERAL CONDITIONS A statement of "General Conditions" , as approved by the City Council , may be included with all specifications sub- mitted to suppliers for their bids. These general con- ditions may be incorporated in all contracts awarded for the purchase of supplies, equipment, or services. 2. 04 COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL PROVISIONS • The purchasing procedures employed shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations of the State and of the City of Mounds View. S Purchasing Policy _ Page Three PURCHASE ORDERS 3.01 PURPOSE • A purchase order authorizes the vendor to ship and bill for materials or services specified in the purchase order. 3.02 ISSUANCE OF PURCHASE ORDER FORMS TO DEPARTMENT HEADS It shall be the responsibility of the Finance Department to maintain an inventory of purchase order forms. The Finance Department will issue purchase order forms to department heads for their use in purchasing needed goods and services for their departments. It shall be the responsibility of the department heads to maintain a record of purchase orders issued by their departments. At a minimum this record shall include : purchase order number, date issued , name of supplier issued to, and the amount of the order. Department heads shall, upon request of the Clerk Administrator or Finance Director, make available for inspection said record of purchase orders issued . 3. 03 ISSUANCE - GENERAL Purchase orders must be issued and sent to suppliers prior to the order of goods and services which are estimated to exceed $500. • a) For orders of goods or services which are estimated to exceed $500 but not to exceed $1,000 a purchase order may be issued upon the signature of a department head. b) For orders of goods or services which are estimated to exceed $1 ,000 a purchase order may only be issued after provisions of this policy pertaining to bidding and quotations has been complied with, the purchase order has been properly issued pursuant to provisions of this policy, signed by a department head, and counter signed by the Clerk-Administrator or Finance Director_ 3. 04 PROCEDURES REGARDING THE ISSUANCE OF PURCHASE ORDERS Copies of the issued purchase order shall be distributed as follows: a) Original to supplier as evidence of the order of goods or services. The supplier should be instructed to include the purchase order number on the statement or invoice sent for the goods or services purchased. b) First copy (yellow) to the Finance Department. "Purchasing Policy Page Four c) Second copy (green) to be retained by the department 411 originating the order. After the goods or services have been delivered and an invoice or statement received the department head shall submit a request for payment to the Finance Department. This request shall include the following: ( 1) Request for payment form signed by department head. ( 2) The second copy of the purchase order. (3) Invoice or statement for goods and services ordered. ( 4) Copies of bids or quotations required pursuant to City purchasing policy. EMERGENCY PURCHASES 4. 01 DEFINITION Emergency purchases are those made by departments only when normal operations of the department would be hampered by the delay resulting from purchasing in the normal manner, or where property, equipment or life are endangered through unexpected and unforeseen circumstances. III 4. 02 AUTHORITY In case of an emergency a department head may, with the approval of the Clerk-Administrator, purchase directly any supplies, materials, or services necessary to alleviate the emergency. Upon the next working day such emergency shall be explained in writing and such explanation submitted to the Clerk-Administrator. Every effort shall be made to contact the Clerk-Administrator whether the emergency occurs during normal working hours or after normal working hours. GENERAL PROVISIONS 5. 01 Department heads are not to split orders to attempt to circumvent any provisions of the City Charter, State Law, or any policy established by the City regarding purchasing. 5.02 Any willful violation of this policy will be reported promptly to the Clerk-Administrator and City Council . Mk ‘)r.,e/b/L-"1,5 110TO: Mayor & Council FROM: Don Brager, Finance Director DATE: June 13 , 1990 SUBJECT: Staffing Analysis Clerk - Administrator Pauley has informed me that it is the desire of the Council that a staffing analysis be conducted as part of this year's Long Term Financial Plan. Prior to undertaking this analysis staff requests clarification of the type of analysis that Council wants. Should this analysis include all employees or employees of certain departments only? Should the analysis seek to determine whether present employees are sufficicent to perform present workloads? Or should the analysis seek to determine whether present employees are sufficient to perform workloads that are desired but not presently performed? If so what is the desired work that staff should be performing? What comes to mind for the Public Works Department is the work standards that were adopted. Does Council 410 wish an analysis of the staffing level that would be required to perform these work standards? Are there expectations of work that other departments should be performing but are not presently performing? Should those issues be addressed in the staffing analysis? Staff seeks Council direction on these matters. _ L"--- 1,14---- / l' III , i TO: Mayor & Council rr FROM: Don Brager, Finance Director Ik DATE: June 13, 1990 SUBJECT: 1990 Truth In Taxation Timelines I recently attended a Legislative Update session sponsored by the League of Minnesota Cities. The 1990 Truth In Taxation timelines and requirements are the same as were approved by the Legislature in Special Session in 1989. They are: No later than: September 1 Cities certify proposed levy and budget to the County Auditor Cities select initial and continuation hearing dates November 10 Counties mail parcel specific notices of • proposed property taxes to all property owners November - Cities publish newspaper ads of their December proposed levy and date of budget hearing November 15 - Cities hold public hearing(s) on their December 20 budgets and proposed levy. The budget and levy must be adopted at one of the public hearings. December 28 Cities certify final levies to the County 1 Auditor A City may not increase it's proposed levy after certification to the County Auditor on or before September 1 but may reduce it at the public hearing on the budget. The levy certifed is, in effect, a maximum amount that may be levied. Proposed budgets are not restricted in this way. The final budget adopted at the public hearing may be increased or decreased from the amount certified in September. Public hearings of the various taxing jurisdictions may not be held on the same day. Since the City is the last to choose it's hearing date we may, as we did last year, have to hold the budget hearing(s) on a day other than 411 Monday as the school board meets on the same Mondays each month that we do and they choose first. The County Auditor is to notify us by August 20 of the dates that the County and School District have chosen for their hearings. Last year we certified a maximum levy by September 1 and per Truth In Taxation Legislation could not adopt our budget until • the public hearing in December. In past years, when the levy had to be certified no later than October 10, Parks and Public Works Departments grumbled about preparing budgets during the time of year that was the busiest for them but had no choice due to the deadline for certification of the levy. This year we have a choice. If Council would approve the maximum levy could be certified by September 1(as was done last year) and a preliminary budget could be certified on that date also. This preliminary budget could be the amount of estimated revenue the City will receive from all sources. Since the City's policy has been to have a balanced budget that number would be fairly close to the budget that would ultimately be adopted. The budget preparation process would take place after September 1 and would be completed no later than the date of the City's public hearing on the budget. This would enable Public Works and the Parks departments more time to concentrate on departmental workloads during their busiest times. If Council would approve of this Staff will prepare a budget calendar using those parameters for your consideration 41Pram,.., l5 • MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO' DATE: MAY 31, 1990 SUBJECT: 1990 LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY The 1990 Session of the Minnesota Legislature was clearly a significant one in that the Legislature adopted several pieces of legislation having major impact on cities. These pieces of legislation included amendments to the Pay Equity and Truth In Taxation Laws as well as a tax bill which again modifies Local Government Aids, levy limits and the property taxation structure in the State. Before getting into exactly what happened during the last legislative session, I would like to review for you two bills that were not adopted in this Session but are likely to be reintroduced in 1991. The first is the Land Use Planning bill which has been around the Legislature for at least the last two sessions . An interim study committee will again be evaluating the need for modification to the current statues regulating land use planning in the State of Minnesota. The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities has been very . active in this area and will continue to oversee this legislation on behalf of its member cities. The second piece of legislation that was not acted upon in 1990 but likely to be reintroduced in 1991 is contractor licensing. This bill has also been around for at least two years and proposes that the state assume authority for licensing contractors on a State-wide basis, thus prohibiting individual cities from licensing contractors. The difficulty as I see it with this legislation is not the loss of revenues which we definitely would see should the State take over contractor licensing, but the fact that it would be more of an enforcement problem to make sure that all contractors working in the City are licensed than we currently experience under our local licensing ordinances. Although the State would be licensing these contractors and determining whether or not they meet their standards, any resident in Mounds View who has a problem with the contractor would still be expecting the City to assist them in mediating that situation. Our difficulty in those types of cases would be that we would no longer have the "hammer" of a license to hang over the contractor when the work that is being performed is clearly inadequate. 411 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL !II PAGE TWO MAY 31, 1990 I would like to summarize those bills adopted by the Legislature in 1990 that are of interest to the City of Mounds View under twoe general headings. The first is general legislation which is all legislation other than Truth In Taxation, Tax Increment Financing and the LGA/levy limits. Those two I would like to summarize in a seperate section of this memorandum identified as a "Tax Bill" . A. GENERAL LEGISLATION 1. PAY EQUITY (COMPARABLE WORTH) CHAPTER 512 (S.F. 488) The pay equity legislation adopted during 1990 clarifies the previous pay equity law put into place in 1984 and amended in 1986 and 1988. The legislation stated that pay equity is applicable to females only and that no governmental jurisdiction bound to the provisions of this law is required to adjust male wages, even if the results of a pay equity study or an adopted pay schedule indicate that wage increases for male employees or male dominated groups are appropriate. The definition for equitable compensation was revised to read, " . . .the compensation for female dominated classes is not consistently below the compenstation of male dominated classes of comparable work value. " The Department of Employee Relations (DOER) has been given the authority to review reports submitted by local governmental units by December 31, 1991 to determine whether or not the wage schedules in those units are consistent with the intent of the law and has enforcement authority, including a $100 per day penalty clause which would be deducted from the jurisdiction's Local Government Aid if the Department of Employee Relations determines that the pay schedule is in violation. The law does not provide specific direction as to how compliance is determined and at this time the Department of Employee Relations has not handed down any guidelines that we may use to evaluate our pay structure in light of their standards. It is my hope that we will be receiving some information from them in the very near future so that any wage adjustments that might be necessary to bring them within their standards can be accomplished before the December 31, 1991 reporting deadline. 111 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE THREE MAY 31, 1990 I will be submitting a separate report to you on this subject after I have attended additional workshops and review DOER's policies. 2 . Ethics Reform HF 2666 - After great debate the Legislature adopted Ethics Reform legislation which applies to elected and appointed officials of cities with a population of more than 50,000. The Ethics Reform legislation requires that these officials file economic interest and conflict of interest statements as well as register as lobbyists should they meet certain criteria. Since the City of Mounds View does not have more than 50,000 in population we will not be bound to the provisions of this legislation. 3 . Omnibus Election Act, Chapter 585 - The Omnibus Election Act which started out as a housecleaning bill from the Secretary of State's Office ended up having two surprises for cities which were not 411 originally proposed by the Secretary of State's Office. The first of these surprises is a statutory prohibition on cities which attempt to regulate the size of campaign lawn signs. Cities are not permitted to regulate the size of campaign lawn signs from August 1 to 10 days after a general election. Since the City of Mounds View currently has provisions within its Sign Code which regulate campaign lawn signs, I will be requesting an opinion from City Attorney Barney regarding the impact of this legislation on our code in order that appropriate amendments may be made before August 1 of this year. The second surprise relates to the cost of conducting the Presidential Primaries which begin in 1992 . The Legislature clarified the Presidential Primary Law calling for the first primary on the first Tuesday in April in 1992 but included no provision for the reimbursement of county and municipal expenses related to conducting this presidential primary. The final item within the Omnibus Election Act of interest to the City of Mounds View is a provision • that will require cities to maintain a register of permanently disabled voters that would result in these voters automatically receiving . 4 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE FOUR 411 MAY 31, 1990 absentee ballot applications for each election. Rules have yet to be developed by the Secretary of State's Office with respect to this requirement. As a result, I am unsure as to the exact manner in which this requirement will be implemented and its effects upon us. 4 . Water Processing Fees, Chapter, 594 (H.F. 2419) The permit fees currently charged by the DNR for water use processing operations which includes City wells were significantly increased by this legislation. At the present time the City pays a permit fee of $515 per year for our wells. Under the new legislation we could expect that this fee will increase by 100% or greater. 5 . Prosecutor Training, Chapter 419 (H.F. 1365) This new law requires that the Attorney General develop a six hour course on the prosecution of bias related crimes and requires that City Attornies maintain a record of attendance at these • courses by prosecutors under their jurisdiction including themselves . 6. Tort Reform, Chapter 555 (S.F. 1827) The Legislature has, over the years, considered several bills relating to Tort Reform that would increase the liability of cities. Luckily, the legislation adopted during this last session did not include any modifications to the current limits on our financial responsibility. The only provision that could potentially have impact upon the City in an indirect fashion is a repeal of the social host immunity law which previously had protected adults who knowingly provided alcohol to minors from liability. Now, if an adult knowingly serves a minorr alcohol, even in a social setting, they are liable in the same manner as would be a bar under similar circumstances. 7. Dry Cell Battery Regulation, Chapter 409, (H.F. 1921) - This legislation prohibits governmental agencies, including cities, from disposing of certain dry cell batteries and mixed municipal waste. The regulations do not apply to most commercial businesses nor to homeowners . • MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE FIVE MAY 31, 1990 8. Lawful Gambling Reform, Chapter 590, (S.F. 2018) The legislative reform of charitable gambling in the State of Minnesota resulted in three provisions which apply to cities . The first of these continues to allow organizations to make contributions of their charitable gambling profits to local governments but prohibits direct contribution to law enforcement or prosecutorial agencies. The second provision prohibits the ' Charitable Gambling Board from issuing licenses unless the city in which the licensee intends to operate adopts and submits a resolution approving the license within 60 days of the date of application. Finally, video games of chance are further restricted and are made illegal after January 1 of 1992 . Cities may be more restrictive on these games, including their outright prohibition, prior to the State's prohibition on January 1, 1992. 9 . Street Vacation Proceedings, Chapter 433 (S.F. • 1980) - This legislation requires that cities give written notice of street vacations to each affected property owner at least 10 days before the hearing. The notice must include a copy of the petition. I will be referring this item to City Attorney Karney for his recommendation on appropriate amendments to the City Code relating to street vacations in order to come into compliance with this statute. 10 . Qpen Meetings Data Practices, Chapter 550 (S.F. 1874) - This legislation significantly alters the rules for handling employee disciplinary actions as were setforth by the Minnesota Supreme Court's Annandale Advocate Decision in January of 1989 . Some of the more significant portions of the legislation are, • Data developed as part of a disciplinary action which is classified public must be released when a final decision has been rendered. • A public body must close a meeting for • preliminary consideration of allegations or charges against an individual subject to its MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE SIX MAY 31, 1990 authority. If the members conclude that disciipline of any nature may be warranted, further meetings or hearings must be open. Cities cannot close a meeting to discuss date which is not public. Government officials may discuss not public data at a meeting without liability if the disclosure relates to a matter within the scope of the public body's authority, is reasonably necessary to conduct the business, and is without malice. During an open meeting, the public body must make reasonable efforts to protect the data from disclosure. A public body may close a meeting to evaluate the performance of an individual subject to its authority. The governmental unit must, however, identify the individual to be evaluated prior to closing a meeting. At its next open meeting, the body must summarize its conclusions regarding the evaluation. Finally, the law provides that before closing a meeting a public body must state on the record the specific grounds that allowed the meeting to be closed and describe the subject officials will discuss. The legislation minimally applies the Open Meeting Law to the Legislature. Meetings of the Legislature but not caucuses or regional specifies that a meeting occurs when a quorum is present and action is taken regarding a matter within the jurisdiction of the body. This differs from requirements for cities in that all meetings are open to the public whether or not action is taken. Finally, no court or administrative body has jurisdiction to enforce, invalidate any provision, or otherwise interpret this law as it applies to the Legislature. 11. Minimum Wage, Chapter 41 (H.F. 139) - This statute increases the minimum wage to $4 .25 per hour effective January 1, 1991. • 110 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE SEVEN MAY 31, 1990 12. School and Sick Kid Leave, Chapter 577, (S.F. 409) This legislation creates two new employee benefit programs. The first provides that full time employees may take unpaid leave of up to 16 hours per year to attend school conferences or classroom activities related to the employee's child. The second benefit provides that full time employees may take sick leave for absence due to illness of the employee's child. The City's personnel code currently provides that employees may use sick leave for purposes of attending to the needs of an ill child. A section will need to be added to the personnel code as it relates to unpaid leave for attendance at school conferences or classroom activities. 13. Cigarette Vending Machines, Chapter 421 (H.F. 2042) - This legislation limits the location of vending machines and their operation by requiring . that the machines be operated either by token or controlled by an employee. The law expressly allows more restrictive local regulations . Since the Council has previously taken a position on this matter of waiting to see what the Legislature does, you may want to take this matter up again. B. TAX BILL 1. Truth In Taxation - The Truth In Taxation portion of the Tax Bill made several changes to the original legislation adopted in 1988 and amended in 1989 . These changes are as follows, All cities will be required to comply with the requirements beginning with the 1991 budget. A new timeline has been established, see Attachment No. 1, which results in the final adoption of budgets and certification of levies between November 15 and December 20, 1990. County auditors have been given the . responsibility for scheduling public hearings on the budgets of the county, cities and MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE EIGHT MAY 31, 1990 school districts to avoid conflicts. Cities .'iil1 be the last of the three groups to schedule hearings and are required to do so between August 20 and September 1 on dates that are not in conflict with the county or school district's hearing dates . The requirement for newspaper advertisements has been eased somewhat in that the ads must appear in " . . .an official newspaper of general circulation in the taxing authority. . .of general interest and readership. . .published at least once per week. . . (and) must not be placed in the part of the newspaper where legal notices and classified ads appear. " This will allow the City to publish an ad in the New Brighton Bulletin rather than the Minneapolis Star. The County will be required to mail generic property tax notices, see Attachment No. 2 to • each property owner registered in the County. Beginning in 1991 for budget year 1992, Ramsey County will be required to send out specific notices. The Legislature had previously appropriated $1.4 million to reimburse counties for the notices sent out in 1990 for budget year 1991. If the County costs for the preparation and mailing of the notices exceeds the state funding distribution, the excess costs will be shared among all of the participating local governments. 2 . Tax Increment Financing - Although many signficant changes were made to the Tax Increment Financing Law, most of them will not affect our current districts . As it relates to new districts, however, the Law is so prohibitive that it would be unlikely for the City to be able to create new districts or make any additional boundary changes to existing districts. Those changes which will affect the City's districts are as follows, County administrative and road costs - Counties are to be reimbursed for • administrative costs and improvements to MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE NINE MAY 31, 1990 County roads which are necessary because of a TIF project. Districts that were created prior to this Law and have a tight revenue stream, having to pay these costs, which were likely not budgeted for, could jeopardize the ability to pay debt service costs. The Law does not address this possibility. As a result, a city affected by this requirement would either have to levy for the revenue shortfall or seek resolution through the courts or legislature. Excess Increments - Excess funds in the debt service account at the time bonds are retired and which are distributed to the city, county and school district would result in penalties. Each jurisdiction would have their levies reduced by the amount they receive. This requirement will force cities to retire bonds early, as soon as adequate funds are available or use the increments for 411 other eligible activities in the district rather than redistributing excess increments back to the taxing jurisdictions. LGA Cuts/Levy Limits - As you know, local government aids were cut by 1.53% of 1990 LGA plus total levies. For Mounds View it is expected that this will result in an LGA cut of $31,159. The same amount of LGA is cut in 1991 after the levy limit base calculation has been made. For Mounds View this calculation is as follows . 1990 Levy $1,391,306 1990 LGA (before cut) $ 645,260 $2,036,566 x 1.03 (3% Inc. ) $2,096,663 - 31, 159 LGA Cut $2,066,504 1991 Levy ($29,938 or 1.5% Increase over 1990) MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE TEN MAY 31, 1990 Note: No allowance made of household or population growth. ( .05% of the greater of the two. ) Repeal of levy limits which was to have gone into effect in 1992 has been rolled back by the Legislature to 1993. If the LGA cuts that were made in 1990 and 1991 do not result in the total saving goal established by the Legislature, further cuts in LGA are to be expected. Changes to property tax rates were also implemented in the 1990 Tax Bill and are as shown below. Homestead: PAY 90 PAY 91 First $68, 000 1 % 1 % $68-$100 ,000 2% $68-$110 , 000 2% 111, Over $100 , 000 3% Over $110 , 000 3% Commercial/Industrial: Pay 90 Pay 91, First $100,000 3.3% 3.2% Over $100,000 5.06% 4.95% Should you have any questions regarding the above information I will be happy to respond to them to the best of my ability or obtain additional information for you. cc: Department Heads City Attornies Meyers and Karney City Planner Hren ,- _ ma,cimes a 1990 Truth in Taxation Timeline Requirements for ALL Cities By• August 1 Department of Revenue notifie notifies cities of LGA amounts and allowable levy for cities under levy limits September 1 Cities certify proposed levy and budget to county auditor Cities select initial and continuation hearing dates November 10 Counties mail generic notices • of proposed property taxes to all property owners, parcel- specific notices sent in Hennepin, Ramsey, and St. Louis Counties November - December Cities publish newspaper ads of their proposed levy November 15 - December 20 All taxing jurisdictions hold public hearings December 28 Cities certify final levies Cities certify compliance with truth in taxation requirements to Department of Revenue League of Minnesota Cities 5/90 • A! Jild..-GJjMe/1 / l 0�Q► Notice to property owners of Spruce County Q Proposed property tax to be collected from property owners for 1 1... • P p P Y P P Y 99 Meetings you can attend to express your opinions on the proposed tax... Property Owner(s) Property Description John J. and Mary A. Johnson Lot 1, Block 1 123 Spruce Street Spruce Acres Subdivision Spruceville, Minnesota 55555 Spruceville, Minnesota Youri council c ty (if you live in a city), your county Referendums, special assessments, legal judg- commissioners and your school board will hold ments, natural disasters and revised population hearings soon to decide on the amount of property figures could result in an increase in the pro- taxes to collect in 1991 to pay for services they posed amounts shown on line 1. will provide in the upcoming budget year. Your city council, county commissioners and The amounts shown on line 1 below are the total school board members invite you to attend amounts of property tax which will be collected in the hearings at the times and places shown be- 1991 if the budgets now being considered by your low to express your opinions on the proposed city, county, and school district are approved, amounts before they are voted on. City County School District 99 . of Spruceville of Spruce Spruceville/Oakville 1 Total tax proposed for 1991 $ 239,000 $ 464,000 $ 320,000 2 Total tax for 1990 $ 220,000 $ 450,000 $ 290,000 3 Change from 1990 to 1991 + 8.6 % + 3.1 % + 10.39 4 One-year population change + 2 % + 2 % + 1.5 % pupil units 5 Times and places of meetings 8 pm Nov 19 7:30 pm Nov 26 7 pm Dec 3 on proposed taxes Room 456 Room 123 Cafeteria City Hall County Courthouse High School 6 Times and places of additional 8 pm Nov 20 7:30 pm Nov 27 7 pm Dec 4 meetings if necessary same place same place same place 7 Where to send comments Mayor's Office Spruce County Board School Superintendent and/or get a copy of the pro- 321 Spruce Street 123 Spruce Street 456 Spruce Street posed budget Spruceville, MN 55555 Spruceville, MN 55555 Spruceville, MN 55555 • V /6' I 411 i TO: Mayor & Council ..4.1k FROM: Don Brager, Finance Director - Treasurer DATE: May 21, 1990 SUBJECT: Property Valuation Service The League of Minnesota Cities has established a low cost property valuation program with the assistance of American Appraisal Associates. For a fee of $125 per building American Appraisal Associates will determine the replacement cost of large buildings. An accurate replacement cost will assure the City that buildings are not overinsured or underinsured. If overinsured the City is paying unnecessary insurance premiums on the amount that the building is overisured. If underinsured the City would not realizee the full relacement value in the event of a total loss on the building. I have discussed this service with our insurance agent, Charles Clysdale, and it is his recommendation that the City have the City Hall and the maintenance garage valued by American Appraisal Associates. I . concur with our agent's recommendation. Total cost of this service would be $250. Since the insurance account is under budget I recommend that the cost of this service be charged to the insurance account 100-4190-480. Other City buildings and structures may be valued using a computerized program owned by our insurance agency, the Maguire Agency. The program will calculate current replacement values per type and size of building using values supplied by the Association of Independent Contractors. This is a free service that is provided to the City by our insurance agency. • 'r ` 0 • ` : ouncl authorize the appraisal of the City Hall and the maintenance garage by American Appraisal Associates at a cost of $250. to be charged to the City Hall insurance account: 100-4190-480. MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUN- L FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRAT• - � DATE: June 5, 1990 \Ni SUBJECT: 1990 WORK SCHEDULE Attached for your information is an updated work schedule for 1990 dated June 1, 1990. You will note that some changes have been made to the scheduling of certain activities at the request of the appropriate Department Head and some activities including Festival In The Park, transportation vehicle grant, new Highway 10 traffic study, etc. have been included as these additional work activities were either left out of the original work schedule or were added to our list of activities since the last update. Should you have any questions regarding this work schedule, please let me know. DFP\MJS • • -11 0 13 C C� r to :0 71 .71 @ r co D C E CO CO OJ A z H CO D 2 COp n 3 m .� H m m 11 ?J �-+ )-+ fR H I5 -! m I) m r -i r m m H0 rill°13 -I r C F- C: 0 0 n = Gi i ) c c_ -i i' C )+ Q C� n U) )+ '•L' �' r '� H T' f -� �- H H S -� m z m r ►+ m H -rn �, �, r; m �-, In H H �, n n r '--�cn m m mm r! " 3Hm mm3c -+ z mO m cnr.• >_ En rO H rn -1 EE i 47 = m + 0? m C m m i! G! CQ -I + ?J: Or 7 ?t -i m t �= r -i n r .i: in rwNf zr % > i'-i ?? C 3 H m -+ ti -1 3 H t-r7 `n n n -1 in n r m m m n 7! r) �)?r_ -I CO + I> n L U) 0 m 0 I> to c C -I m T 0 m c' H 3 n m Tw r -! O m H 1) r m 1-+ --1 I) r r Z 3 S) H ITI -I m f�1 m 01 3 :I -.I -I ❑ z m rtl �+ z- 7) -I0! mm -1 " mrn13m -;. I - W 1 =' -S-f -1 ? _) mm m ;_s3m -1rn11 -n H -I nr� r ;- Cn•• -1nrnrn -i p -I 3 • 3 -I 71. H 71 z ?J 3 -4 3 -I 0 A m n CI c CO S z m D _ �+ ++ l! -I U; H V! I> in 3 z C CO -i C f m -x CO - --I 0 ' -I c_ --I C-) 7 H -n H -1 • m C G - m " r -4 -0 M m ?J 71 07 ?Jt I-+ m m • -i p m O co -ti 0 D I A Ti z I> C C m < 7. z 7 73 in )n 73 11 z I) O H H CO 0 13 13 -I --1 C 13 --' m 71 -ti 7 n -0 to 0 < n n (..n • cr., r r ?J -I: H m 73 H r r -1 r in 1 73 -I r 73 Z z 3 n ?J r in 13 111 CO -I -I I) .. m I> Z n m :0 p m ZS) m I, 3 m m 0 in '13 n n n n n u- nT 73 r = -u r ' E p H 3) 1 _.1 p r -3 '- O c z m 3 1; C' ° T -I -1 -1 ft} T,, 7 t!t 71 T H 71 P1 • in r r xi xi 0 -I 1 1 1 O r -1-1 - CO r, I, r .tt r* - -o z H - ✓ n m m m - --I..................-, 7,............._......................._.................................._............................_...............................................n............» in in 1J I, I r 1 (110` f m H -1 \DC •Din - i - � Ii n I z) .I43 - 0 II I r i .P n 13 i.- L, .....__........................._...._..__.._...............»..........._..............._.............._......_............. .................. 1 , ..................._...._...._................................................._.._.........................,..........._...._._................. i....................... T i .....-- TOn ..o r-: ,J I n 0, r r n m r - pnm l l 1 I - L,� T . .'. 1 L................. LII.I1- III•.I.... ' -;uH35Tm -I73 `�1 rel Sj ...........................................................».... »........ ........._. o m - 1m HI I I T 7 n - n r z i I "- 3 >.0 G) . r. i I -1 ti_ 1 Q 1 r I 0 0 •A U ri r H C C C C 13 -o C N1-* XI z 13 '0 13 "U 2 D -I ,0 JJ ,0 Ill D 0 0 0 0 z .m ,, D .D 03 m I) I) I) I• H Y r n ,o r 0 -1 -1 -1 --1 z H H m M in Rl m u) .4} -1 CO r 11 X '• . " < C p ,-i CO to N n m n - 7 co C 00 m ;13 of G) r m c.) 2 3 0 r m z CO n )- -I -I --I 0 m H 7 • r) m m H --1 III I { n 67 C? .3 7 -r I-. 0 II CO CO 3 r' m rri n T r -n 73 3 O O z Z n *i m m I2 m n _ z 0 1• - -1 71 n 7 T in c n -i 71 w 2 -4 U7 C U? --i 13 2 H r n_ G G-! -p r- 1 z ` . w- E - ❑ 1— W ❑ •O - I L— Lt. — Z ;I W is — Q Lv - LL 2 Cr: 9_ 1 eT • u Lt, 410 1 t a T T { • 4110 W � — R• i 0 t O F— it u• — • r E- E O 6CL O 0 0 ▪ L -1- 7 /g MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY CO 111 FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATOR Voir DATE: JUNE 12, 1990 SUBJECT: CITY ENTRANCE SIGN LOCATION Attached please find correspondence I received from Mr. R. J. Dineen of the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Office of Right-Of-Way and Surveys advising that the parcel of property on the northwest corner of County Road H and Highway 10 is now available for purchase by the City in the amount of $1,495.05 . As you will recall, we have had previously requested authorization to acquire this property from MnDOT in order to place a city entrance sign at this site. I received an opinion from our consultants on tax increment financing that the purchase of this land and the construction of an entrance sign is an eligible activity for the Mounds View Business Park Tax Increment District and, therefore, all expenses related to the purchase of the land and construction of the sign could be charged to the Mounds View Business Park Project. Should you find the proposal from MnDOT acceptable, I would ask that you approve it at your next regular meeting • authorizing payment from the Tax Increment Fund in order that acquisition can be made. At the same time I will be finalizing drawings and a design for this site with the company we have been working with for the entrance sign on the west side of the City and will be bringing the final drawings and landscaping plan to you for your approval. It is my hope that both of these signs can be completed before the end of this construction and planting season. DFP/MJS 4 f y0 /'. Minnesota Department of Transportation 33 3. O� Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155 MINNESOTA1990 OF TRP�c, June 4, 1990 296-8649 Donald F. Pauley O Clerk Administrator ti 4 % O) 4 City of Moundsview 2401 Highway 10 , clitt c-1 Moundsview, MN 55112co S4 �oM, VQ fes, In reply refer to : 7300 ��v 1 ‘ 14�Z S.P. 6284 (35W=394) 901 . Ramsey County Parcel 86 - R. Skiba Reconveyance At Co. Rd. H in Moundsview Dear Mr. Pauley: I am pleased to inform you that we now have all the necessary approvals and appraisals for the reconveyance of that portion of the above referenced parcel as shown in red on the enclosed map • and as described in the enclosed legal description. The subject property is now available for its appraised value of $1, 500.00, to the City of Moundsview for public purposes. Since the grantor (State of Minnesota ) is responsible to pay a deed tax of $4.95, the State will accept payment in the amount of $1,495.05 ($1, 500.00 minus $4. 95 ) and have the City pay the deed tax when they record the quit claim deed from the State. If this is acceptable please submit payment in the amount of $1, 495. 05 in the form of a certified check, cashier' s check or money order made payable to "Commissioner of Transportation - Trunk Highway - - - 00, 0 •- C y' s reply. Upon receipt of the above payment, a quit claim deed for public purposes will be issued to the City of Moundsview using the enclosed legal description. If this is not correct please advise . • An Equal Opportunity Employer Donald F. Pauley June 4, 1990 Page 2 If you have any questions on this matter, please feel free to call Mr. John G. Schmitz of this office at 612-296-8648. Sin. -rely, R. J. Dinneen , Director Office of Right of Way and Surveys Enclosures: Map (1 ) Legal Description ( 1 ) Return Envelope (1 ) , December 14, 1989 •RW7550AG.pp DESCRIPTION FOR RECONVEYANCE Parcel 86 S.P. 6284 (35W=394) 901 All of Tract A described below: Tract A. That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 30 North, Range 23 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota , which lies northwesterly of a line run parallel with and distant 50 feet northwesterly of Line 1 described below, southeasterly of a line run parallel with and distant 75 feet southeasterly of Line 2 described below and between two lines run parallel with and distant 175 feet and 275 feet northeasterly of Line 3 described below: Line 1. Beginning at a point on Line 3 described below, distant 169 . 29 feet northwesterly of its point of beginning; thence run northeasterly at right angles to said Line 3 for 126 .73 feet; thence deflect to the right on a 10 degree 00 minute 00 second curve (delta angle 35 degrees 10 minutes 52 seconds) for 351 .81 feet and there terminating; 410Line 2. From a point on the south line of Section 9, Township 30 North, Range 23 West, distant 80.31 feet east of the southwest corner thereof , run northerly at right angles to said south section line for 667.87 feet to the point of beginning of Line 2 to be described; thence deflect to the left at an angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds for 404.39 feet; thence deflect to the left on a 06 degree 00 minute 00 second curve (delta angle 34 degrees 28 minutes 52 seconds) for 574.69 feet; thence on tangent to said curve for 200 feet and there terminating; Line 3. Beginning at a point on the south line of said Section 8, distant 897.5 feet west of the southeast corner thereof; thence run northwesterly at an ang e o A •- • - - seconds seconds from said south section line (measured from west to north) for 400 feet and there terminating; containing 0. 23 acre , more or less ; Subject to the following restriction: No access shall be permitted to Trunk Highway No. 62 renumbered 10 , to Trunk Highway No. 394 renumbered 35W, to County Road H or to Highway Avenue from the lands herein conveyed; except that access shall be permitted along the northeasterly line of Tract A hereinbefore described by way of the existing Park and Ride Site , for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a City owned sign only. • . _ .-.,.---_-,..,---_,,,,-_,.- .• -:_.._ __ .1:-_. _-_ --------t-----t---:-:_ ...... P77" r • .... - . • ...._ ....., ..., 3;., . go u...ffan' ' haintir--- - --- ---6 '' . 0., I. ggi _ 7.:___,,;_._.__.__ . • • 140 PdEllyni., mi ' - --- -- -- isw ,....-.....4.,,, ..: _;;,.. . 1....g, —.•.::.: _______ -1111 1 ':.•;..•..'4milmra.--- 1,44ang. mg....R.c,. . nig' _...kiit . IDE R I. s.. :E;11,37c,,,,i,n....„„.illThli!SLAM"' •. 1 4%V72690 2 ••41ftiou .R. r1.6:W173-1).S.E.D. CoNc.moN. -?": • (.. . I • i' •b • .. ,• • • /) i ' 1, °40)111m ' • •-6'/Y .r":47.-2-7/ :'U.S.E.D. ,=A, ...:,Niilf===••"•"13 ra,,i 1 8LONG WN.. Loo _ . IWO lial! tAir Ams11.1! -. T.. . :ii • ra •.13, . •.-.CONc m•,/ ri". ;;;IT'''''. '' it mew n - ........ . . ..0 . .:.:• • :2, .r ;21 r„,.,Iimil .. „ .:- , 1g . _ I a, .,.., 24 lialli I,. I Am! , ; lip ,c‘ . • •••=m•-•i oot , •, .....----;--------------"'—'' .. ..!,.6-4i.i..1;,,:•..it.:1 "1„,, ,t,•.1).•0,• , =I= Mi25,..., '" ,7 .53 ;I .... ...1,../..sx,.. ---49 c, .- ti, " o -• .. tiz_____..._......:..::,...•:*.rt 1 ...,,,s,....to 004 ,,,,,,..i 404,.., •• p• %IV c., ;....,, 11.',,,,,;,:n4.1„ \, .c.---TT--(3377---...,`.1.,. ' `5- etitriss.____--- ..,.. ....,...,..... ..ALf • ..:....... . ii3 f. ..., ' 0 OUINCY n . sr - - ....r • r/.. .0"5— .—. n ..• omm. 1(1 ......%j till .:....,..>" ..,.. ill • v . 1 1 A z • - . /)! ../ -' .4 ..., ......., ., ____ _a_ ,.6......„ .. .... . ,,,,,,..._ :,....„, , . .1/7 , „\, /(L,.. • .,,\ ..,. ...., ..„.„..., jr, . . . . _. -.....•••,..„......., ,.....1„. '41 . i i ----- -3 • \ 2 l '6 I 1, h . \‘• ___-_„0:---,--,,,--..-- , \‘.. I O., ' B ./ L.0 CS, I . r,- _.N.C. .. . / 1 • • "dill 4 1.1116k. Vii.,-:•yp,,i•>�E^ �,,.. - Qom. Wait•1-.••:,,,,,-..,..;•,.............. .> w7.� --- -- �.- ° .. —� �, ,.--.-.'::,..4 .-,i.'. .y_ '.t ss. •1,"-.`,Y�:.r"J `....._ti-.,� ----------------f-.--'•== � V II :r • -4 0.___________ � _ , i -_�_Csir."�.'il4r_:.L.3'i'i• . mI,V.•7 s i 1 � a,,,1-' u.. �---- -- - - • „..; i _ �_ �i��- �.,., -tl:F Y +.,.,.:..,.'.y I ::h =1.u A.•, 1 ®``.,_moi yWe i• ....7.e.-. ' tli . ...gym ... Q.,v,4\.\.C....::17-1—••• 0 • : • • - • • N. L g a UI 43 '- Z8 • •• L� o I D s 31 3 I p, FA, f 1(;) al •••...LR 0 u c v� ,d •98 1CI Q. il a a z • 1•0416W 'z� r v•s 1 � Z ��� \ 58i b8 a ��N N 1 t. • __ Z1> sew • 4 ,..- ,-,-- l ____ �l Nir\ ---6,----...._______________°" I v b11 ',' \ \ \ \:� •tj\:� \1113. o, i \ k41%C)10 . // \\ \I x�S I' , ,,<, • 18 I. \\� •\ • IJ ti �0 v •��/� 98 ° G p . • {1 l b �„____/ yd� '\ C•�4\G `rN • �' •�` o per, `����'r� J'' '� pi/ � ✓ am1 p c'`,- \ \ \‘ �0 v4 • .,,G1 0 g 9 f: r �,p�L .- � . ,d °co � :.�\� . \ .,t- d •,. ,,, . V-Vpg,-,‘,".%*'. IITV ' iji0ji):-.. A. „,\1 \ 98 4 \-, ` , - \ :�'` -/ :Yi-- \ cb� �D�J •& •• •• i - Vs8 • -• ,/•91/ i'3 ��o 0 0`�, :•...,.....7.,,,,.....- 1. \ ��' .moi �,;,�:f ..r, ,�: ���✓�• •9�, d teIA n'j� ✓' % ��•s'IrOir �i,E���i6��f�;�'� / �' I . 0 0 0.,6 d,•0 '�►,/ / �� �.•d•• C.C' Wil! / ? i MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 1 FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATOR � A /1)" DATE: JUNE 12, 1990 / SUBJECT: AMM 1990 MISSION AND MEMBERSHIP SERVICES TASK FORCE REPORT Attached please find a letter from Mr. Larry Bakken, President of the AMM and Golden Valley City Councilmember transmitting to the City a copy of the report of the 1990 Mission and Membership Services Task Force. Mr. Bakken requests that the City Councils of the member cities of the AMM review the report and indicate their support or opposition of the proposal for adding a staff member and increasing dues to member organizations. I was a member of the original Mission and Membership Services Task Force that made a report in 1984 which also recommended the addition of a staff member to the Association's staff. The reasons given by the 1984 Task Force are similar to those provided by the 1990 Task Force on page 14 of their report. As the Legislature increases their level of involvement in • property tax aids and general legislative issues effecting cities in Minnesota and, particularly the Metropolitan Area, it is important that organizations such as the AMM and League of Minnesota Cities have adequate staff to lobby on our behalf before the Legislature and the Metropolitan Council. This increased lobbying activity draws the current staff away from their other duties including staffing, standing and ad hoc committees of members as well as their general day-to-day relations with member cities. The Task Force recommends that the additional staff member be assigned those duties that suffer when increased lobbying activities occur. . . - . . . . - 1.- . _ -. : , - - • . - i - - recommending -recommending an increase in dues in a range of 20-25%. Currently, the City of Mounds View pays dues in the amount of $2,789 for 1990 . A 25% increase would result in dues being approximately $3,500 per year. At the request of Mr. Bakken I am placing this item on your June 18th Agenda for your consideration. Should you wish to have a representative of the AMM attend this meeting or a future work session to discuss the proposal with you, please let me know. DFP/MJS S as ociation of metro olitan p munici alities June 4, 1990 Dear Chief Administrative Official: I NEED YOUR HELP NOW! 'The AMM must become more proactive, more collaborative, more focused and more assertive. The AMM provides the only meaningful vehicle for the cities of the metropolitan area to express in a united voice this important perspective of local government. ' The above quote, perhaps more than any other statement, capsulizes the major conclusion of the 12 member AMM Mission and Membership Services Task Force which just completed a year long evaluation and assesment of the AMM's mission, focus and general operations. The Task Force, in its final report, concluded that the AMM has been a very • effective 'voice' and provides many benefits for the cities in the 7- county metropolitan area. However, the Task Force feels that we (The AMM) are at a crossroads and must not rest on our laurels as the problems and challenges facing us in the 90's are likely to be even more complex and difficult than the problems of the last decade. The enclosed Task Force report contains a 'blueprint for action' which if implemented should enable the AMM to remain a reliable and relevant tool for member cities as we enter the 90's. The bottom line, however, is that to follow this 'blueprint' we must hire an additional staff member which could result in a dues increase of 20 to 25%. The current three member staff does an outstanding job but the work load has increased so dramatically in recent years that to maintain current programs and increase our effectiveness at the Legislature and to become more proactive at the metropolitan level as recommended in the report, an additional staff member is mandatory. The Board would like to implement the Task Force recommendations and have the additional person on board by early 1991 but will not do so unless there is strong membership support for such action. Here is how your help is needed as asked for in the opening sentence of this letter: 1. Please provide copies of this letter and report to your Mayors and Councilmembers. 411 -1- 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-4008 • 2. Please place the report on your Council's Agenda for discussion and action prior to August 1, 1990. (If you would like an AMM board member to attend your council meeting when this item is discussed, please contact an AMM staff member to make the arrangements. ) 3. Please inform the AMM Office by no later than August 15th. as to whether your city supports or opposes adding a staff member and the resultant dues increase. (You will be notified as to the exact amount of such increase by no later than July 6th. ) 4. Please have a representative from your city attend the special AMM Membership Meeting pre-scheduled for Thursday evening, September 20th. to consider and vote on this matter. I thank you in advance for your help and thoughtful consideration of this proposal. Sincerely, Larry Bakken, President • Golden Valley Councilmember -2- association of metropolitan municipalities p ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES REPORT OF THE 1990 MISSION AND MEMBERSHIP SERVICES TASK FORCE TASK FORCE MEMBERS Kevin Frazell , City Administrator, Cottage Grove, Task Force Chair Mentor "Duke" Addicks, Legislative Liaison, Minneapolis Bob Benke, Mayor, New Brighton Gary Jackson, City Manager, Coon Rapids James D. Prosser, City Manager, Richfield Marilyn Corcoran, Mayor, Dayton Nancy Jorgenson, Councilmember, Fridley Tom Spies, Councilmember, Bloomington Katherine Trummer, Mayor, South St. Paul Larry Bakken, Councilmember, Golden Valley Bob Long, Councilmember, St. Paul Lu Stoffel , Mayor, Hastings • 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-4008 • INTRODUCTION The League of Metropolitan Municipalities (LMM) was originally created in 1967, as a subsection and affiliate organization of the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC). The impetus for forming the LMM was the creation of the Metropolitan Council , and the growth in importance and power of the regional operating agen- cies. It was felt that the cities of the seven-county metropolitan area needed an organization, separate from but complementary to the LMC, to interact with those agencies. In 1974, the LMM merged with the Suburban League of Municipali- ties to become the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM). As the needs of AMM member cities have changed over the years, the Board of Directors has strived to keep the organization relevant. During the late 1970' s and throughout the 1980' s, the Association' s focus has broadened from strictly "metropolitan" affairs, to protecting the interests of member cities in state- wide issues with unique impacts for the metropolitan area. The most prominent recent example is the distribution of state aids to local governments. In 1984, the Association convened its -first Mission and Membership Services Task Force to do an in depth study of the AMM and recommend needed changes. The major concern of that Task Force was the proliferation of splinter municipal lobbying groups within the metropolitan area. The 1984 Task Force was concerned that the AMM could lose its viability as an umbrella organization for all metro- • ::olitan cities in the face of a growing number of smaller groups with differ- ences of opinion on the allocation of state aid resources. The group made 13 recommendations, all of which have since been implemented, with the exception of expanding the staff. The final recommendation of the 1984 report was that the Mission and Membership Services review process should be revisited every five years. Fortunately, predictions of any demise of the Association were ill-founded. Since the 1984 report was issued, five additional communities (West St. Paul , South St. Paul , Arden Hills, Blaine and Shoreview) have joined AMM. The Member- ship now includes 68 metropolitan cities, covering over 90 percent of the popu- lation in the seven-county area. This is an all-time high for the Association. Ironically, one of the splinter groups which existed in 1984, the Municipal Caucus, has since gone out of existence after concluding that its aims and purposes were not that different from those of AMM. The meetings of this year' s Mission and Membership Services Task Force, however, have taken place within the context of an increasing split between the metropo- litan area and Greater Minnesota over taxation, local government aid, and other state fiscal policies. The Task Force has studied carefully how the AMM might be a more effective and united voice at the legislature on behalf of all cities in the seven-county metropolitan area. The Task Force has also considered the Association' s relationship to the League of Minnesota Cities, and how it might help strengthen that organization in serving the interests of all cities throughout Minnesota. At the same time, the Task Force has not neglected the original focus of AMM, which was to monitor and work with the metropolitan agencies. Of particular - 1 - - concern is the observation that as AMM has become involved in more and more statewide issues, the staff has had a very noticeable decrease in the amount of time available to be spent in the area of metropolitan affairs. The Task Force feels strongly that the AMM should not only correct its decreased activity' in metropolitan oversight, but should actually become proactive in helping set the regional agenda. Richfield City Manager Jim Prosser and Golden Valley Councilmember Larry Bakken have drafted a revised "PURPOSES" Statement for incorporation in the Association bylaws. This document, attached as Appendix A, has been adopted by the Task Force as a recommended mission statement for the Association. In a nutshell , the recommended mission is well-summarized in the first item of that Purposes Statement: To serve as the exclusive and primary representative of the collec- tive interests of all metropolitaties on metropolitan-wide and statewide issues with unique metropolitan significance. To further that goal , the Task Force has made several observations and numerous recommendations for specific actions to enhance the success and performance of the Association. Those are set forth by topical area as follows, and prefaced by brief background material . During its deliberations the Task Force received input and advice from a number of resource persons. They are listed in Appendix B. The Task Force wishes to express its gratitude for their time and counsel . • • • - 2 - RELATIONSHIP TO THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES As indicated in the introduction, the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities • was originally created as a subsection of the League of Minnesota Cities and remains in that status today. As such, we are the only organization entitled to an ex officio (with voting privileges) seat on the League Board of Directors. We are considered an "affiliate organization" of the League for the purposes of adopting legislative policy. The Association offices are located on the first floor of the LMC building. Cities in the seven-county metropolitan area comprise approximately 15 percent of the LMC membership, but because of their size pay about one-half of the LMC dues. The Task Force met with LMC President Millie McCloud, as well as Executive Director Don Slater. A member of the Task Force, New Brighton Mayor Bob Benke, currently serves as vice president of the League. The Task Force observations are that the League of Minnesota Cities and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities have maintained a very positive working relationship. Despite the split in the LMC membership over local government aid policies, the AMM has never taken a legislative position in direct opposition to any adopted policy of the League. In fact, LMC and AMM lobbying staffs work cooperatively in many areas of policy agreement (such as pay equity, labor relations law and tax increment financing). Officials from Greater Minnesota have raised concerns about the relationship between the League and AMM. Specifically, it has been questioned whether the AMM should have the ex officio seat on the Board, and whether the relationship between the staffs of the two organizations has been compromisingly close. Due these concerns, as well as our own concerns about the effectiveness of AMM as a subsection of the League, the Task Force considered carefully whether the AMM should be incorporated as a separate entity. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Because of division in its membership, the LMC has been neutralized from effective lobbying on some critical issues like local government aid. This means that the AMM must become more vocal and assertive on behalf of its member cities in these policy areas. At the same time, we wish to support the efforts of LMC to bring together its membership on divisive issues, and recommend that the LMC develop effective consensus building and dispute resolution procedures that enable it to adopt policy positions that have credibility with the legislature. We encourage AMM member city officials to become more actively involved in the LMC, creating a metropolitan constituency group and perspective within the LMC. 2. We recommend that the Association not be incorporated as a legal entity separate from the League of Minnesota Cities. We wish to be supportive of • the LMC, and to encourage AMM member city officials to become more active in the League. We feel that this goal can be best accomplished in our current status as subsection of the League. - 3 - 3. We recommend that the AMM reject any requests that it give up the ex officio seat on the LMC Board. The Task Force feels strongly that we have lived up to the guidelines and spirit under which we are an affiliate organization . (i .e. not taking contrary lobbying positions). 4. We recommend that, as long as possible, the AMM offices remain in the LMC building. We feel that to move from the building would undermine much of the cooperative working relationship that exists between the staffs of the two organizations. It would also be expensive for the AMM to acquire the overhead and support services that it currently purchases from LMC. However, expansion of the AMM staff may make a move from the existing LMC building unavoidable. 5. We recommend that the AMM Board and Membership focus its agenda by refer- ring more of the non-divisive statewide issues to the LMC for lobbying on behalf of all member cities, both metropolitan and Greater Minnesota. • • - 4 - • LOBBYING Legislative policy adoption and lobbying have become the major focus for the • Association, growing steadily over the years. When the Association was formed in 1974, it had two standing policy committees and 35 legislative policies. Today the Association has five standing committees, and the membership has adopted over 100 legislative policies for the current biennium. In addition, several ad hoc study committees for specialized topics (i .e. land use legisla- tion, metropolitan significance rules, group homes) have been formed in the past few years. Intrusion by the legislature into local affairs has increased dramatically in recent years. At the same time, other municipal lobbying groups, most notably the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, have aggressively promoted tax poli- cies that are detrimental to the collective interests of the metropolitan area. Consequently, the AMM lobbyists have been challenged to accomplish more and more at the legislature, without any significant increase in resources. Legislators with whom the Task Force met described our lobbying staff as com- petent and well respected. At the same time, the legislators admitted that the aggressive, and sometimes even abrasive tactics used by other municipal lobbying groups have probably led to more success in accomplishing their agendas. In response to these concerns, the AMM for the first time hired contract lobbyists during the 1990 session. Legislators expressed their frustration with the increasing regionalism of city lobbying groups, and urged us to show a concern for the entire State at the same time we more actively pursue the interests of the metropolitan cities. It was also suggested that having a better data base for lobbying would be helpful in pressing the AMM position. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The AMM should seek to be seen as the organization with the authority and credibility to speak on behalf of all cities in the seven-county metropoli- tan area. 2. The AMM has become "spread too thin" in the number of policy issues it is lobbying, and needs to limit active involvement to three types of issues: a) Issues of concern only to metropolitan cities - i .e. interaction with Metropolitan Council and operating agencies, Chapter 509 Watershed Management Organizations, etc. b) Statewide legislation with unique impacts in the metropolitan area - i .e. land use, solid waste, tax increment financing, etc. c) Statewide issues where the interests of the metropolitan area may be different than, and at times even contrary to, those in the remainder of the State - i.e. local government aid formulas • Specific suggestions for limiting our most active legislative agenda items to these topics are included in the section on committees and the policy adoption process. - 5 - - 3. The AMM' s lobbying efforts in the property tax area have been hindered by lack of immediate access to a computerized property tax model . The Task • Force recommends that the AMM Board of Directors closely monitor the progress of the League of Minnesota Cities in developing a property tax model that is useable and immediately accessible to all cities. If this proves inadequate to meet our needs, the AMM membership should be prepared to bear the expense of developing its own property tax modeling system. 4. The AMM should be proactive, and not just reactive in its legislative posi- tions. For example, the AMM has never produced its own recommended formula for distribution of local government aids, and should consider doing so. 5. At the same time we become more proactive, we should also stay on the high road, adopting positions that reflect responsible public policy for the entire State of Minnesota. 6. AMM member city officials should become more active and involved in the League of Minnesota Cities and its policy study committees. In some cases, we may find ourselves lobbying the LMC, rather than the State legislature, to pursue particular policy positions that are of common interest to all cities in the metroplitan area. 7. The AMM should increase the amount of time it spends one-on-one with legislators explaining AMM positions. We should also hold metropolitan legislators more accountable to the AMM agenda by developing and publish- ing a "scorecard" following each legislative session. 8. In pursuing our legislative agenda, we should "pace ourselves", realizing • that lobbying is an ongoing process. Policy positions should be pursued not only for immediate gains, but for maintaining a long-term positive relationship with the State government and with the League of Minnesota Cities. • - 6 - COMMITTEE STRUCTURE AND POLICY ADOPTION PROCESS The Association currently follows a procedure whereby potential legislative • policies are brought forth and considered for adoption in the five standing policy committees (revenues, metropolitan agencies, transportation, housing and economic development, general legislation). As indicated earlier, the Associ- ation currently has over 100 adopted legislative policies. The policies have been divided into categories as to level of effort in lobbying. The AMM now finds itself actively involved in issues that are not limited in interest to the metropolitan area, even where our positions are similar to those of cities in Greater Minnesota. The best recent example is pay equity, where the AMM position is almost identical to that of the League of Minnesota Cities. Yet because of the high visibility and strong feelings surrounding this issue, many member cities expected the AMM staff to be active in lobbying on this issue. There is also the dilemma of issues that are of interest to a single city, or a limited number of cities. The AMM Board and staff have attempted to be respon- sive to the needs of each member city, but a question is raised as to whether it is fair to take time and resources away from issues that are of more importance to the broader membership. The Task Force discussed at length what to do about issues that are divisive among our own members, for example fiscal disparities or funding for combined sewer overflow abatement. A majority of the committee concluded that the AMM should not avoid taking definitive positions on these issues, as it would be left neutralized on issues of high importance to a large number of city offi- cials and thereby foster the growth of still more splinter groups. • Finally, the Task Force examined the five standing policy committees, concluding that they are working well and that none should be eliminated. In fact, it was speculated -that as new social and legislative problems appear (i .e. the drug crisis) there will likely be a need for additional standing or ad hoc committees. The Task Force further suggests that there may be utility in having a broad- based "futures" committee to simply help the organization anticipate and be prepared for pending issues. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Association needs to focus most of its resources and effort on the few issues of very highest priority to the entire membership. At the same time, the AMM should not narrow its agenda to the point that it loses the interest and support of its broad base of cities. 2. In order to accommodate the legitimate interests of all member cities, we recommend that AMM create an "endorsed" category of policies. These would be policies of interest to a limited number of cities, or those where the League of Minnesota Cities or some other group might reasonably be expected to adequately represent the interests of metropolitan cities. With the AMM "endorsement", the AMM would be officially on record as supporting these • policies, but not actively involved in lobbying or initiating legislation. - 7 - 3. The existing Legislative Coordinating Committee (LCC) should be the "screening and dividing" group for determining lobbying priorities and deciding which policies will be "endorsed" and referred to other groups (i .e. LMC) for lobbying. 4. We recommend that the Association strive to achieve real consensus on divisive issues, and not merely concurrence through a majority vote. Committee chairs as well as Board members might benefit from professional training in dispute resolution. The AMM should not avoid taking definitive positions on issues that are controversial among its own membership. While such avoidance may "buy peace" in the short term, in the long term it neutralizes the effec- tiveness of the organization, undermining its credibility with legislators and causing the proliferation of splinter groups surrounding special issues. The AMM should make use of dispute resolution services, such as the Office of Dispute Resolution in the State Planning Agency and the Mediation Center, a private non-profit community mediation service based in St. Paul . 5. The two-thirds majority vote requirement for adoption of legislative policies should be retained. i - 8 - OTHER METROPOLITAN LOBBYING GROUPS The Task Force met with Minnetonka City Manager Jim Miller, regarding the Muni- cipal Legislative Commission, and Brooklyn Park Mayor Jim Krautkramer repre • - senting the Northern Mayors' Association. The Task Force observation is that the AMM has been able to form effective and cooperative relationships with these specialized groups, and that they should not be seen as a threat to the AMM. As indicated in the introduction, an additional splinter group which existed in 1984, the Municipal Caucus, has since gone out of existence. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. We recommend that the AMM strive to be the organization seen as the legiti- mate voice to speak on behalf of all cities in the seven-county metropoli- tan area, while recognizing the legitimate need of some breakoff groups for special purposes. 2. The AMM should not perceive existing specialized groups as a threat, but attempt to maintain a cooperative and mutually supportive relationship. 3. We recommend that the AMM maintain its openness to all cities in the seven- county metropolitan area, resisting any impetus to limit membership to a more limited group (i .e. suburban caucus). • i - 9 - RELATIONSHIP TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND OPERATING AGENCIES •As indicated in the Introduction, monitoring and oversight of the Metropolitan Council and regional operating agencies was the original focus of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. Yet in recent years, involvement with the Council and agencies has suffered appreciably as the AMM staff has had to spend more and more time supporting the work of its own committees and lobbying on statewide issues. In fact, the staff indicated that it now has almost no time for any involvement with the Metropolitan Council during the legislative session. The AMM currently nominates to the Metropolitan Council eight names for appoint- ment to the Transportation Advisory Board. The Association actually appoints ten to the Transportation Advisory Committee. That system seems to be working well . In contrast, the AMM, along with several other metropolitan area asso- ciations, was recently given legislative responsibility for suggesting appoin- tees to the Regional Transit Board. That process did not go well . The Board of Directors did not limit the number of people recommended for appointment to the vacant seats, and the Metropolitan Council heeded very few of its recommen- dations in making their selections. During its background work, the Task Force discussed the Metropolitan Council at some length with several legislators, as well as the current Chair of the Metropolitan Council and a former executive director of the Citizens League. There was a general feeling among the legislators that the Council has notbeen effective in performing its functions well . At the same time, it was suggested that the. Councilmembers are frustrated due to their lack of a "real clout" and constant legislative undercutting of their authority to accomplish the work for Wwhich they are responsible. ft-th no consensus in the legislature or in the metropolitan area as to the appropriate amount of authority that should be vested in the Council , many metropolitan regional issues get resolved vis-a-vis the political process of the legislature. The shortcoming of this approach is that the metropolitan area is giving up some of the authority to set its own agenda. There is also some con- fusion and ambiguity over the relationship of the Council to the Governor, who is responsible by law for appointing its members. It was suggested that the AMM could very definitely be of help in defining the proper role for the Council and the operating agencies, and in mustering legislative support to enact needed changes. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The AMM should become more proactive in helping set the metropolitan agenda. Historically we have placed ourselves in somewhat of a watchdog or adver- sarial role with the Council and operating agencies, merely reacting to the proposals put forward. We should become more positive in identifying areas of legitimate regional involvement, and help to set the goals and objec- tives to be pursued by regional government, as well as the parameters • within which that work will be carried out. 2. We need to "be there". It is estimated that an AMM staff member should be at the Metropolitan Council and agencies from eight to sixteen hours per - 10 - week, interacting with the Councilmembers and the staff, and keeping affected cities informed and up-to-date as to what is happening in regional government. Other responsibilities have kept the staff from a full commitment to this vital role, and this shortcoming should be corrected expeditiously. • 3. The appointment of members to the Transportation Advisory Board and Technical Advisory Committee seems to be functioning well , and should continue as present. 4. The AMM should continue to support its legislative responsibility to nomi- nate persons for appointment to the Regional Transit Board. The AMM Board of Directors should do a better job of screening the applications which are received, so as to indicate to the Metropolitan Council those people that it truly wants appointed to the RTB. 5. The Task Force recommends that the AMM pursue the possibility of the creation of a metropolitan appointments review committee for the merit review of persons being considered for appointment to the -Metropolitan Council and other regional agencies. The selection board would include representatives appointed by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, the Metropolitan Intercounty Association, the Citizens League, the League of Women Voters, etc. Finally, the Task Force recommends that the AMM be the impetus for creation of a blue ribbon committee to study and better define the mission, role and purposes of the Council and regional agencies. While AMM would be the host, it would be important to involve other government associations and "good government" groups. Also, the the task should be approached in a spirit of cooperation with the Metropolitan Council members. The study of the blue ribbon committee should include alternatives for the selection and appointment of Metropolitan Council members. • - 11 - PUBLIC RELATIONS •If, as suggested in the revised Purposes statement, the AMM is to be the exclusive representative of the collective interests of the metropolitan cities, then it is important that the Association increase its visibility in the eyes of the legislature and the general public. The Task Force reviewed and endorsed the work of the AMM' s Legislative Coordinating Committee Public Relations Subcommittee to establish a public relations system to inform the public, including media, legislators, and AMM legislative contacts about metropolitan city issues. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Media contacts should be identified in each AMM-member city vis-a-vis a legislative contact response form. Legislative contacts in each city should be responsible for interaction with local newspapers, radio, city newsletters, cable television, etc. 2. The AMM staff should identify and establish relationships with contacts within the major metropolitan area media, both print and electronic. 3. A delegation of the AMM staff and Legislative Coordinating Committee should meet with major newspaper staffs early in legislative sessions to discuss AMM priorities and positions. Media contacts, both local and metropolitan • wide, should be invited and encouraged to attend our legislative breakfasts. 4. During legislative sessions, we should issue specific press releases on AMM priori-ties, and response to important issues (i .e. tax policy) as changes are proposed. 5. At the conclusion of each legislative session, we should issue press releases on the AMM' s legislative agenda, and how well we believe the legislature met the needs of metropolitan area municipalities. 6. We recommend that AMM develop a "report card" of priority issues with ratings for each legislator. These should be distributed to member cities with suggestions for potential local use. 7. We need to identify potential allies on important issues, i.e. Chambers of Commerce, League of Women Voters, etc. • - 12 - COMMUNICATIONS WITH MEMBER CITY OFFICIALS The Task Force feels that the AMM needs to develop a metropolitan "conscious- ness" among member city officials, so that they will buy into and promote the • AMM' s agenda. Unfortunately, Councilmember time is scarce, making it difficult to insure that each and every member city official is well-informed and aware of AMM activities, policies and priorities. The first recommendation of the 1984 Task Force report was that the AMM should expand its effort to communicate directly with all elected officials in member cities, as opposed to only mayors and city managers. Since that time, the AMM has had differing distribution lists for different types of communications. Apparently, this is causing a great deal of confusion, and may actually be causing a decrease in consistent communications. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The AMM should strive to publish a short executive summary of legislative positions that could be quickly read by member city officials who don' t want the "full shot". 2. An AMM contact person, preferably the City Manager/Administrator, should be developed in each city. All communications should be sent to that one con- tact person, plus the Mayor, with the contact person taking responsibility for seeing that the material is duplicated and sent to all members of the governing body. The AMM contact person will also be responsible for reporting on AMM activities at the Council meeting. AMM should work • with the Metropolitan Area Managers Association (MAMA) to enlist the support of Managers/Administrators for reproduction and distribution of these'Communications. 3. Member cities should be encouraged to place discussion of AMM policies and issues on regular City Council agendas to ensure that all elected officials are kept aware of AMM activities, as well as to increase the Association' s visibility with local media. 4. Each member of the AMM Board of Directors should commit to make a brief presentation at four or five surrounding City Council meetings once each year on AMM policies and activities. • - .13 - WORKLOAD AND STAFFING then originally formed, the AMM had four full-time staff members. Shortly thereafter, in response to a financial shortfall , the staff was cut to three and has remained at that number since. During that time, the number of legislative policies has increased from 35 to over 100, and the number of legislative study committees from two to five. The Association has taken on other responsibilities including the license and permit survey, and coordination and administration of the Metropolitan Salary Survey. With more time being spent on lobbying of statewide issues and support for committees, there has been a decided time shift away from interaction with the Metropolitan Council and operating agencies. Yet the AMM is the only organiza- tion providing any real oversight of these agencies. For example, we are usually the only commentor on the Metropolitan Council ' s annual work program and budget. The AMM Membership has come to expect more involvement by the Association, not only in metropolitan issues, but in tax policy, pay equity, tax increment financing, and other areas of statewide concern and involvement. The 1984 Mission and Membership Services Task Force report recommended very strongly that the Board of Directors seek ways to add a staff member. Yet this is the only one of the 1984 recommendations that has yet to be implemented. To quote that report, "the present staff simply cannot adequately cover all the critical issues, agencies, committees and the legislature." The present Task Force report, if ultimately adopted and implemented by the Board and membership, will •nly serve to increase the workload significantly. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Task Force strongly recommends that the Board of Directors add a staff person. We further recommend that this person have responsibilities in: a. communicating with member cities and maintaining the legislative contact system b. public relations, including media contacts c. staffing some of the standing and ad hoc legislative committees d. some monitoring of Metropolitan Council and agency activities, particularly during the legislative session. 2. With regard to lobbying at the Capitol , the Task Force observes that this effort will fluctuate from time to time. Therefore, it is recommended that increased efforts in this area be handled through use of contract lobbyists. • - 14 - 1 DUES The membership dues for the Association are currently set at 46 percent of a member' s dues for the League of Minnesota Cities. Since the League dues are set in part on a per capita basis, this works out to AMM dues ranging from a high of 30 cents per capita for Woodland to a low of 4 cents for Minneapolis. The dues for an average sized city of 30,000 population are $5,100, or about 17 cents per capita. Compared to other city lobbying organizations, the AMM is a bargain! For example, the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities charges its members 40 cents per capita, plus from time to time, an additional 20 cents per capita for "special projects". Dues for the Municipal Legislative Commission are approxi- mately 35 cents per capita, to a maximum of $12,500. If the AMM Board of Directors and membership are to implement our recommendation to add a staff person, a dues increase beyond the rate of inflation is inevi- table. In addition, the cost of developing the computerized property tax model , if determined necessary, will be a considerable initial expense, and require ongoing personnel and data gathering costs. RECOMMENDATION 1. In order to implement the other recommendations in this report, the AMM Board of Directors and membership should be prepared to adopt a dues increase in the range of 20 to 25 percent above the rate of inflation. The Board may wish to look at ways of phasing the dues increase over a two to three year period. 2. The Board and membership should also be prepared to provide financial sup- port for development and maintenance of a property tax modeling system, if the LMC system fails to materialize or is determined inadequate to meet the lobbying needs of the AMM. - 15 - SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities is now in its 16th year. During relatively short existence, the Association has experienced many diffi-. •its culties and challenges. Examples include the 1976 Metropolitan Land Planning Act and the more recent debates over local government aid. Despite predictions for the demise for general purpose organizations like the Association, the AMM is now at an all-time high of 68 member cities, repre- senting over 90 percent of the population in the seven-county metropolitan area. The cities of the region apparently believe that they are getting a good value for their membership dollars. However, despite the successes of the past, the twelve members of this years Mission and Membership Services Task Force have concluded that this is no time to rest on our laurels. We face challenges from other city lobbying groups whose interests are contrary to those of the metropolitan area, as well as a generally hostile attitude by the State legislature toward cities. At the same time, the complexity of governing the metropolitan area is increasing geometri- cally, meaning that it is more important than ever to work together if we are to effectively serve the citizens of our respective communities. The Task Force concludes that in order to remain viable and relevant, the AMM must become more proactive, more collaborative, more focused and more assertive. The AMM provides the only meaningful vehicle for the cities of the metropoli- tan area to express in a united voice-the important perspective of local govern- ment. The issues at stake are simply too important to abandon the playing field and leave all the important decisions to others. Association was originally formed out of several metropolitan area splinter •The groups who had originally felt that they had little in common, but came to realize that the things they did have in common were far more than those that divided them. The challenges of today are certainly no less thanthose that faced our cities in the past. Our test will be whether we can continue to be an effective voice for the collective interests of the cities in this metropolitan area, and to pass that test will require two things: 1. A renewed ability and commitment to come together through our com- mittees and 19-member Board of Directors to reach a consensus on the critical issues that face us. 2. The ability to effectively, and with a united front, promote the policies we do adopt to the Governor, the legislature, the Metropolitan Council and the regional operating agencies. The Mission and Membership Services Committee feels that the recommendations set forth in this report will set us well on a course to accomplishing just that. We commend it for your consideration and thoughtful action. 110 - 16 - APPENDIX A PURPOSES • The purpose of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities shall be to: 1. Serve as the exclusive and primary representative of the collective interests of all metropolitan cities on metropolitan wide issues and state wide issues with unique metropolitan significance. 2. Promote collaborative problem solving efforts between and among cities, the State, the Legislature, private interests and other public interests. 3. Effectively express in a unified voice, policies concerning the structure, powers and other matters relating to municipal government for the municipalities in the metropolitan area to the Legislature, Metropolitan Council and agencies, LMC, media and cities. 4. Serve as a forum through which all municipalities or groups of municipalities may develop and propose policies and positions on matters on concern to the metropolitan municipalities and develop strategies for advocating those policies and positions. 5. Serve as a forum for the interchange of ideas and information among municipalities in the metropolitan area and to foster • intermunicipal cooperation. 6. Assist member cities resolve disputes with other cities and agencies. 7. Develop and provide, either alone or in concert with League of Minnesota Cities or other organizations or agencies, programs of technical assistance to member municipalities. 8. Establish specific prioritized agenda, including Legislative proposals to address member community needs. 9. Foster, generate and promote information and data concerning the problems and issues and proposed solutions affecting municipal government in the metropolitan area to the State Legislature, in particular, and to the public at large. 10. Enhance the effectiveness of municipal government in the metropolitan area by holding conferences and by fostering pertinent research projects. 11. Coordinate the efforts of AMM members to promote their interests within the League of Minnesota Cities. 12. Enhance the quality of life in the metropolitan area and its cities by promotingefficient and progressive service delivery systems for our residents. . APPENDIX B • List of resource persons who consulted with the Task Force: Vern Peterson, Executive Director, Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Roger Peterson, Director of Legislative Affairs, Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Donald Slater, Executive Director, League of Minnesota Cities Jim Miller, Minnetonka City Manager and Representative of Municipal Legislative Commission Jim Krautkramer, Brooklyn Park Mayor, President of Northern Mayors' Association Millie McCloud, President, League of Minnesota Cities • State Representative Phil Carruthers (DFL-47B) , Chair of Metro Affairs Subcommittee of House Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee State Representative Alice Johnson (DFL-51A), Vice Chair of House Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee Al Loehr, Legislative Administrative Assistant to Senator Bob Schmitz (DFL-36), Chair of Senate Local and Urban Affairs Committee Steve Keefe, Chair, Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Ted Kolderie, Former Executive Director, Citizens League of the Twin Cities • c.16141.t, 4 0 • MEMO TO: DONALD PAULEY, CLERK-ADMINISTRATOR FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DATE: JUNE 12, 1990 SUBJECT: CODE REVIEW #35, 51 AND 52 CODE REVIEW #35 - FESTIVITIES COMMISSION My recommendation is to delete this code since the Festivities Commission has dissolved due to lack of interest. The task of organizing the "Festival in the Park" has been undertaken by the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department for the past four years. CODE REVIEW #51 - DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION & FORESTRY My recommendation is to delete this code since it is the only staff up position in the code. This document is the actual job description and seems to be misplaced as a part of the code book. CODE REVIEW #52 - PARKS. PLAYGROUNDS AND OPEN SPACE Prohibition of glass beverage containers is missing and has been inserted as 52.04. With this addition, the code is complete. MS/SL • CHAPTER 52 PARKS, PLAYGROUNDS, OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION AREA RULES AND REGULATIONS 52.01. PURPOSE. The following rules and regulations are hereby adopted for all parks, playgrounds, open space and recreation area designated by the City of Mounds View. 52.02. DEFINITIONS. (1) Parks, playgrounds, open space, and recreation area. Any area, designed by the City of Mounds View, wherever located within the City which is reserved, designated or used for active or passive recreation and which is owned, operated or controlled by the City or controlled by another government unit. (2) Motor vehicle. "Motor vehicle" means every vehicle which is self-propelled and does not derive it's power from over-head wires. Motor vehicles include, but shall not be limited to, automobiles, trucks, motor bikes, mini-bikes, snowmobiles and battery-powered carts. 52. 03 . INTOXICATING AND NON-INTOXICATING BEVERAGES. No intoxicating beverages shall be consumed, displayed or possessed in any park, playground, open space, or recreation area in the City. In no event shall any non-intoxicating liquors be • sold or bartered in any park, playground, open space or recreation area. 52 .04. GLASS BOTTLES PROHIBITED. No glass beverage containers are allowed in any park, playground, open space or recreation area in the City. 52 .04 52.05. MOTOR VEHICLES PROHIBITED. No person, unless engaged in official City business, or otherwise specifically authorized by the Clerk-Administrator, shall operate a motor vehicle in any park, playground, open space, or recreation area within the City of Mounds View except upon these areas that area designated for use by certain vehicles. 52. 05 52. 06. CURFEW AUTHORIZED. No person unless engaged in official City business shall enter upon or use any park, playground, open space, or recreation area of the City, including all park property, improved or not, and all equipment and facilities located thereon, between the hours of 11 10 o'clock p.m. and 6 o'clock a.m. when such facilities are posted by signs noting the curfew hours; provided, however, that such posting shall be by order of the City Council. The fact that any person not engaged in official City business as authorized or delegated by the Clerk-Administrator may be present in a close park during said curfew hours shall be prima facie evidence that • said person is there unlawfully. 52. 07 411 52.00 52.07 SNOWMOBILES. See Chapter 202 as it relates to parks. 52.07 52.08 SWIMMING. No person shall swim, bathe in, or enter any park waters or unauthorized swimming areas except where indicated by City authorized sign placed by the Parks and Recreation Department. 52. 08 52. 09 DAMAGING OR REMOVING PROPERTY PROHIBITED. No person shall destroy, damage, mar, deface or otherwise injure any property or facility in City parks, playgrounds, open space or recreation area. No person shall break, cut, mutilate, injure, remove, or carry away any tree, plant, flower, shrub, rock, soil, sand, fence, benches, tables, or any property or facilities located in City parks, playgrounds, open space or recreation areas. 52.09 52. 10 TRAPPING BY PERMIT ONLY. No person shall place or set any trap or device designed to kill or capture wild animals upon privately owned or public lands within the City in violation of any law, ordinance or rule pertaining to trespassing. No person shall engage in trapping on publicly owned lands within the City without possessing a valid permit. A permit may be issued by the City Council to any applicant who can satisfactorily demonstrate the following: • (1) They possess a valid state trappers license; or (2) They are under the age of 16 years and have completed a course in trapper education offered by or under the sponsorship of the Dept. of Natural Resources; or (3) They have at least three years of previous trapping experience and have not, within the preceding three years, been convicted of a violation of any trapping law, ordinance or rule. No person shall place or set any trap with a jaw spread greater than six inches upon privately or publicly owned lands within the City. 52. 10 52 . 11 SELLING PROHIBITED. No person shall sell any article whatsoever in any City park, playground, open space or recreation area unless specifically authorized by the Director of Parks and Recreation, in conformity with all statutes and ordinances relating thereto. 52. 11 52. 12 POSTING OF SIGNS AND HANDBILLS PROHIBITED. No person shall paste nor affix nor inscribe any handbill or poster or sign on any structure or property in any • City park, playground, open space or recreation area unless specifically authorized by the Director of Parks and Recreation. 52 .13 52. 12 52 . 13 FIREWORKS PROHIBITED. No person shall discharge any fireworks within the City parks, playground, open space or recreation area without the written permission of the Director of Parks and Recreation and the approval of the Fire Chief. 52. 13 52. 14 CAMPING PROHIBITED. No person shall camp nor set up tents, shacks, trailers, or any other temporary shelter for the purpose of camping in any City park, playground, open space or recreation area without the written approval of the City Council. Any dumping of human or other waste upon park, playground, open space or recreation areas shall be a public nuisance. 52. 14 52. 15 UNAUTHORIZED GOLF PROHIBITED. No person shall play or practice golf nor use golf equipment of any kind in a City park, playground, open space or recreation area except under the direct supervision of an employee of the Department of Parks and Recreation or as a scheduled part of the City's park and recreation program. 52. 15 52. 16 ANIMALS TO BE LEASHED. No person shall allow his dog or other domestic animal in a public park or open space without being effectively restrained by chain or leash or contrary to any other provisions of the municipal code. No person shall allow defecation from his dog or domestic animal to remain deposited upon City parks, playgrounds, open space or • recreation areas. 52 . 1G 52 .17 FIRES TO BE CONTROLLED. No person shall ignite a fire in any parks, playground, open space or recreation area except in places provided for such purposes. Persons igniting a fire in a provided place shall completely extinguish such fire prior to departing. No fires shall be permitted contrary to the municipal code. 52. 17 52 .18 PENALTIES. Any person, firm, corporation, or association violating the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 52. 18 52 . 19 ENFORCEMENT. This code shall be enforced by the Mounds View Police Department which shall have the responsibility to patrol City parks and enforce the applicable ordinances and regulations. • RESOLUTION NO. 3045 411 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY ON THE RECOGNITION OF DONATIONS TO THE CITY WHEREAS, during the development of Mounds View many individuals and organizations contributed time and funds to the development of parks and other municipal facilities; and WHEREAS, it is expected that the City will continue to receive such contributions in the future; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to establish a policy allowing for the recognition of contributions from individuals or organizations without minimizing the past, present or future contributions of others; and WHEREAS, said policy must also allow the City the opportunity to recognize all who have made or will make contributions in an equally appropriate fashion. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the recognition of contributions to City parks and facilities shall be limited to the placement plaques or signs of a design and in a location approved by the City. At no time shall a park or municipal facility be named or renamed in recognition of an individual or organization. Adopted this 25th day of June, 1990. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator • MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO- A`� DATE: JUNE 7, 1990 • SUBJECT: CHAPTER 31 HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, CODE REVIEW I have reviewed Chapter 31 of the Municipal Code entitled, "Human Rights Commission" and would recommend that no changes be made to this chapter. DFP/MJS • • ,Adi • 31.01 (4) CHAPTER 31 HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION 31. 01. Subdivision 1. Public Policy. It is hereby declared that it is the public policy of Mounds View to fulfill its responsi- bility in securing for all citizens equal opportunity in housing, employment, public accommodations, public services and education, and to work consistently to improve the human relations climate in Mounds View. Subdivision 2. Establishment. There is hereby esta- blished a human rights commission. The purpose of the commission is to secure for all citizens equal opportunity in employment, housing, public accommodations, public services, and education. Subdivision 3. Composition. The commission shall consist of the members of the City Council. Subdivision 4. Meetings. Such commission shall meet at least once a year in the month of January, and may meet there- after upon call by the Mayor. Subdivision 5. Duties. In fulfillment of its purpose the • commission 's duties and responsibilities shall be to: (1 ) Adopt by-laws and rules for the conduct of its affairs including the election, assumption of duties and definition of responsibilities of officers and com- mittees. (2) Enlist the cooperation of agencies, organizations, and individuals in the community in an active program directed to create equal opportunity and eliminate discrimination and inequalities. (3 ) Investigate human relations and civil rights problems brought to the attention of the City. (155, 166A, 201) '' Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. 2205 Woodale Drive Planning Case No. 292-90 •. ' , S 1 1 I H N V a 2=1 V d O i A 1 1 O • - j"7'474IM •I •11 I •iC A.:MMILM 7amSit2L01I r 7:11, wYIWia` . la f'd �{'-J•�=J;yy'��•,J-�q4 w+`la��,rrr.;.;.trrr���..1y77��� {Fl,..�� ny _eLA = ,L .... i. • • ,N. IIKIFITIMIRIMIH g : k 1 '1111 . .. MOlfl ae '1«I QAEiAfil tiDA©rs II t air �!'71111V 2 a., ,- , p. .'.�7..' W �r , ... III yon ( \ f�i • g' OM ... CIE' MEM=*In L6 e 0. 1 r. ii....-'7;7 11.1 1622 1 ' . Aktk .0 ,�s- PCZZ oma® - ., .. t f —i III:EW IQ hl!!: :: yv127 : 1 1� 131:94, Mi �� �tim uu yVis.. •( _ • is: .' I�� 1 a 11111 Prifii`c • rV1 �. MOIML PIMP G� 1 MEi i'fad ;ilii a s j�.` • 4.# gringgrar, .2! . - 41F7MHMEn ,►ez S: i • . RI, Fr ...). --, ... 1 • i Ntifitillil §sr /..."•:&-1;mi-stir' I — ==== 2:;;t:_;---_ "-'/414' Arm 1. al tt'4" M A. • .1.11.1 MO c AIFhmE1I Ell oAl ^ I M T - / •.ill: : -EP,AVEIHRHEn I R 1 . 00 p gg >� /� LS:I,r':7� 744tr- - a isl'4nI� e�SI� If. - �,' X - v z '4r / a7or 7M01 — Q / .r: r w 1"i S • ri �..� ��i... _ $4; ; D ; F. .�` N ®Fi u � LI©U x 0 n �� oror i7aMo — x 11®fHHHH 1HH • t ®�H®HEREAD UUST m • 1o . - zg w IiiiW �;� Z R. .1 0 1 u _ 41llHfl9 IIB ' — }' cr.-:,6 .'� 7A.M O • YI Z :.1:4:1411I z ' F� "�q ' pp �►Mt 11a1131� a®® ;11818a il NI r )) L• —]I^1 ' 000 Wall I — -.a:a.. '=-,-....4- a n.w w .a o - a4 R W 4 o HIW to-♦ W w� littiht_ 6. /9. / • RESOLUTION NO. 3038 - CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REQUESTED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AND SITE DESIGN PLANS FOR A PROPOSED BUILDING EXPANSION FOR MULTI-TECH SYSTEMS, INC. , 2200 WOODALE DRIVE, PLANNING CASE NO. 292-90 WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the requested planned unit development amendment by Multi-Tech Systems, Inc . that would allow a building expansion and additional parking that includes an above and below grade parking ramp; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposal meets the minimum yard setbacks, exceeds the parking requirements and provides for a revised landscaping plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the potential access issue to the property to the west and recognizes that the proposed plan does not provide an easement to the west property • through the Multi Tech site; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed City Forester, Wriskey's memo dated April 24, 1990, regarding the proposed landscaping on this site; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed City Engineer, Minetor's memo dated May 2, 1990, regarding the grading, utilities and drainage on this site; and WHEREAS, the Fire Department reviewed the proposed expansion and requires a direct route around the entire building; and WHEREAS, in order to meet this requirement, the applicant has proposed a below grade road on the west side of the building in order to allow emergency vehicles around the perimeter of the building; and WHEREAS, the proposed below grade road plans have been found to be acceptable to the City Engineer; and RESOLUTION NO. 3038 • PAGE TWO WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment is in keeping with the original Planned Unit Development for the Mounds View Business Park; and WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a plan review of the proposed building addition and parking ramp and find it to be acceptable. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the requested Planned Unit Development Amendment and plan review for the building expansion and parking ramp contingent upon the following: 1. The amendment is recorded with Ramsey County 2. That a fence be installed around the parking ramp first level opening to prevent unwanted intruders into the ramp area Adopted this 29th day of May, 1990. ATTEST: • Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator '4,1f"4-kc„ 8. /9 • MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY CO FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRAT I111 DATE: MAY 16, 1990 SUBJECT: LAKESIDE PARK NAME CHANGE As a result of your direction at the May 14th Council Meeting, I contacted Mr. Don Busch, the Spring Lake Park City Administrator, and we have tentatively scheduled a joint meeting and public hearing for 8:00 p.m. on Monday, June 11 at Mounds View City Hall. The Spring Lake Park City Council will be scheduling this date at their May 21st Council Meeting and I would ask that you, if this date is acceptable, schedule it at your May 29th meeting. Staff intends on publishing notices of the hearing in the New Brighton Bulletin which is published that week on May 31st. Therefore, I would ask that you advise me at the May 21st Agenda Session as to whether or not this date and time is acceptable. DFP/MJS F . 6. MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI 111 ..1111 fr. FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO, �" 1 DATE: May 24, 1990 SUBJECT: SPECIAL MEETING REGARDING 1990 BUDGET During your discussions regarding a special meeting to consider amendments to the 1990 Budget to allow for the reduction in state aids, I neglected to remember that the presentation of the Fire Department's request for a bond referendum had been scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on the evening of June 5th which is the same evening you intended on holding your special meeting on the budget. Considering the fact that this presentation and discussion will likely last at least two hours, I would recommend that you find an alternative date for the budget meeting or direct me to reschedule the meeting with the Fire Department and the three City Councils. Your direction in this matter is requested. DFP/MJS • • II/ MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNC FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO: iipr DATE: MAY 16, 1990 SUBJECT: 1990 BUDGET CUTS As a result of the anticipated reduction in local government aid in the amount of $31, 150.00, the Department Head Team has reviewed the 1990 Budget and would like to offer the following items as cuts in the Budgetequal to the expected loss in state aid. 1. Finance Department, Account No. 100-4150-703, $1,500 Included in the 1990 Budget was the purchase of a replacement personal computer system for the Finance Director. This item was purchased out of the 1989 Budget and, therefore, this line item is not necessary. 2 . City Hall, Account No. 100-4190-303, $20,000 This line item was for the space needs study on City Hall. As you know, the approved proposal for the study was in the amount of $17,400. Once the study is completed the City • will need to undertake an intensive public information campaign should the Council authorize a referendum on this matter or on the proposal from the Parks Commission for a park improvement bond referendum. Bill Morris of Decision Resources has indicated to me that his firm would be able to assist the City in developing a public information campaign at a cost not to exceed $2,500. The City would also be experiencing substantial expenses for printing of informational brochures and other costs related to a bond referendum. It is my considered opinion that $30,000 in this line item would be more than adequate to cover the cost of the space needs study and any public information campaign related to a bond referendum. Therefore, a reduction in this line item of $20,000 would be appropriate. 3. City Hall, Account No. 400-4190-480, $10,000 The bids for the City's insurance came in at $10,000 less than what was budgeted and therefore these funds could be used to make up for the reduction in state aids. The total proposed cuts to the 1990 Budget from the Department Head Team equal $31,500. We would recommend that the Council approve these cuts as a means to make up for the reductions in state aids . Should you agree, staff will prepare a resolution for your consideration at the May 29th Council Meeting • reflecting a reduction in revenues and expenditures in order to provide for a balanced 1990 Budget. DFP/mjs 01/1/1/3 RESOLUTION NO. 3039 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WHEREAS, The City Council has reviewed the claims numbers: 30555 through 30679 in the amount of $ 135,952.60 30254 through 30269 in the amount of $ 68,341.89 through in the amount of $ through in the amount of $ TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 204,294.49 and has found said claims to be just and correct; (list of any exception) NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated 05/30/90 by the vote ayes nayes ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator iE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10A MOUNDS VIEW 1DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 10 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT 10 NANCY KRACL 30555 05/30/90 05/30/90 10.00 10.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-•351029 AMT- 10.00 DESC-NANCY KRACL/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 10.00 10.00 18 DAVE''S PERKINS CONSTR* 30556 05/30/90 05/-0/90 21.00 21.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-3250-000000 AMT- 10.00 DESC-DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING/REFND ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-3250-000000 ALIT- 10.00 DESC-DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING/REFND ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-3826-000000 ALIT- 1.00 DESC-DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING/REFND VENDOR TOTAL 21.00 21.00 !00 CLAYTON FOSBURGH 80557 05/30/90 05/30/90 64.00 64.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 AMT- 64.00 DESC-CLAYTON FOSBURGH/UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 64.00 01 ED GIBSON 30558 05/30/90 05/30/90 128.00 128.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 128.00 DESC-ED GIBSON/UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 128.00 128.00 '02 ARTHUR PATNODE 30559 05/30/90 05/30/90 64.00 64.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 ALIT- 64.00 DESC-ARTHUR PATNODE/UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 64.00 03 E MINNESOTA, INC 30560 05/30/90 05/::0/90 594.00 594.00 AC INT NUMBER- 100-4100-160000 ANT- 594.00 DESC-ARCA MN/AP'P'LIANCE CLEAN-UP VENDOR TOTAL 594.00 594.00 04 MICHELLE BERRY 30561 05/30/90 05/30/90 14.00 14.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351033 AMT- 14.00 DESC-MICHELLE BERRY/REFUND �+ (��ry(+ (± /� (� /� VENDOR TOTAL 14.00/ , f 1(4.(0/0 05 DAHL & ASSOCOCIATES, * 30562 05/30/90 05/30/90 50.00 50.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 7.0-2305-000000 ANT- 50.00 DESC-DAHL & ASSOC/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 50.00 06 GARY DEGROSS 30563 05/30/90 05/30/90 83.00 83.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352142 AMT- 83.00 DESC-GARY DEGROSS/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 33.00 83.00 07 KATIE EATON 80564 05/30/90 05/30/90 4.00 4.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 2550-3500-354233 AMT- 4.00 DESC-KATIE EATON/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 4.00 4.00 08 EQUITY TITLE SERVICES 30565 05/30/90 05/30/90 140.60 140.60 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-3991-000000 AMT- 140.60 DESC-EQUITY TITLE SERVICES/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 140.60 140.60 09 HELEN JAMME 30566 05/:_50/90 05/30/90 28.50 28.50 AC T NUMBER- 250-3500-352107 AMT- 28.50 DESC-HELEN JANNE/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 28.50 28.50 E ^ ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER Citi MOUNDS VIEW II+OR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 10 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT 10 LEONA JOHNSON 30567 05/30/90 05/30/90 28.50 28.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352107 AMT- 28.50 DESC-LEONA JOHNSON/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 28.50 28.50 11 RICK JOHNSON CONSTRUCx :30568 05/30/90 05/30/90 30.00 30.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 ANT- 30.00 DESC-RICK JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION/REFD VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 30.00 12 WILBUR KLEMZ 30569 05/30/90 05/30/90 30.00 30.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 30.00 DESC-WILBUR KLENZ/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 30.00 13 ROBERT KROONBLAWD 30570 05/30/90 05/30/90 9.00 9.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352130 AMT- 9.00 DESC-ROBERT KROONBLAWD/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 9.00 9.00 14 CLARISSA HITT 30571 05/30/90 05/30/90 13.00 13.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351042 AMT- 13.00 DESC-CLARISSA HITT/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 13.00 13.00 15 VICKIE JOHNSTON :30572 05/30/90 05/30/90 16.00 16.00 A 1HT NUMBER- 250-3500-351030 ANT- 16.00 DESC-VICKIE JOHNSTON/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 16.00 16.00 16 MIDWESTERN MECHANICAL :30573 05/30/90 05/30/90 187.50 187.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-2305-000000 AMT- 187.50 DESC-MIDWESTERN MECHANICAL/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 187.50 187.50 17 JEANNE MIELKE 30574 05/30/90 05/30/90 10.00 10.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-331029 AMT- 10.00 DESC-JEANNE MIELKE/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 10.00 10.00 'i$ RICHARII_W NUNN 30575 05/30/90 05/30/90 40.00 40.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 40.00 DESC-RICHARD W NUNN/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 40.00 19 JOANN PASTORIUS 30576 05/30/90 05/30/90 18.00 18.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351029 AMT- 15.00 DESC-JOANN PASTORIUS/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 18.00 18.00 20 EMILA & ANNA P'IATILA 30577 05/30/90 05/30/90 40.00 40.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 40.00 DESC-EMILA & ANNA PIATILA/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 40.00 22 RENEE RACH 30578 05/30/90 05/30/90 5.44 5.44 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-43`51-160000 AMT- 5.44 DESC-RENEE RACH/SUP'F'LIES VENDOR TOTAL. 5.44 5.44 23 BE T+ ERLY SCHMIDT 30579 05/30/90 05/30/90 18.00 18.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-:3500-:352107 AMT- 18.00 DESC-BEVERLY SCHMIDT/REFUND . . }E q ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER C10���� MOUNDS VIEW ���� IDOR -- CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 0 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT 1 VENDOR TOTAL 18.00 18.00 24 WILLIAM SEIBERLICH 30580 05/30/90 05/80/90 40.00 40.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 40.00 DESC-WILLIAM SEIBERLICH/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 40.00 25 STATE TREASURER, STAT* 30581 05/30/90 05/30/90 15.00 15.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-363000 AMT- 15.00 DESC-STATE TREAS/WTR OPER-HANGGI VENDOR TOTAL 15.00 15.00 26 PHILIP P TU 30582 05/30/90 05/30/90 40.00 40.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 40.00 DESC-PHILIP TU/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 40.00 27 TWIN CITIES TRIM-LINE* 30583 05/30/90 T115447 05/01/90 236.00 236.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-704000 AMT- 236.00 DESC-TWIN CITIES TRIM LINE VENDOR TOTAL 236.00 286.00 28 LYNNE WITEK 30584 05/30/90 05/30/90 20.00 20.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351002 AMT- 20.00 DESC-LYNNE WITEK/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 20.00 20.00 29 N RIEDL 30585 05/30/90 05/30/90 16.00 16.00 AC��UNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351030 AMT- 16.00 DESC-SHAUN RIEDL/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 16.00 16.00 01 GAB BUSINESS SERVIES,x 30586 05/30/90 05/30/90 62.40 62.40 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-480000 AMT- 62.40 DESC-GAB BUSINESS SERV/STANDFIELD VENDOR TOTAL 62.40 62.40 45 S FA M CO. 30587 05/30/90 5661649 05/14/90 51.64 51.64 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 51.64 DESC-THE S & M CO/PARTS VENDOR TOTAL 51.64 51.64 07 RONALD LADWIG 30588 05/30/90 05/30/90 224.00 224.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 192.00 DESC-RON LADWIG/UMPIRE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020125 AMT- 32.00 DESC-RON LADWIG/UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 224.00 224.00 11 ROD MALIKOWSKI 30589 05/30/90 05/30/90 64.00 64.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020120 AMT- 64.00 DESC-ROD MALIKOWSKI/UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 64.00 16 NEIL TOBIASON 30590 05/30/90 05/30/90 160.00 160.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 160.00 DESC-NEIL TOBIASON/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 160.00 160.00 21Lr LADWIG 30591 05/30/90 05/30/90 90.00 90.00 ACeNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 66.00 DESC-LOREN LADWIG/REFUND ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020125 AMT- 24.00 DESC-LOREN LADWIG/REFUND 3E Aik ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER CMOUNDS VIEW 1DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 1O VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 90.00 90.00 .55 BARTON SAND AND GRAVE* 30592 05/:0/90 BAR6321 05/10/90 92.92 92.92 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 AMT- 92.92 DESC-BARTON SAND & GRAVEL/FINE SAND VENDOR TOTAL 92.92 92.92 x05 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAF* 30593 05/30/90 05/30/90 582.00 582.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-170000 AMT- 264.00 DESC-MN DEPT OF PUB SAFETY/PERMIT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-170000 AMT- 159.00 DESC-MN DEPT OF PUB SAFETY/PERMIT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-170000 AMT- 159.00 DESC-MN DEPT OF PUB SAFETY/PERMIT VENDOR TOTAL 582.00 582.00 :12 MIDWEST CHILDREN RES * 30594 05/30/90 05/90/90 40.00 40.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-303000 AMT- 20.00 DESC-MIDWEST CHILDREN'S RESOURCE CT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-303000 AMT- 20.00 DESC-MIDWEST CHILDREN'S RESOURCE CT VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 40.00 09 MANTEK 30595 05/:30/90 30-47452 04/30/90 433.79 433.79 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 433.79 DESC-MANTEK/SUP'P'LIES VENDOR TOTAL 433.79 433.79 `02 illk STUNEK 30596 05/30/90 05/30/90 32.00 32.00 A NT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 ANT- 32.00 DESC-GENE STUNEK/UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 32.00 :32.00 26 NYSCA 30597 05/90/90 4710 05/15/90 105.00 105.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160036 AMT- 105.00 DESC-NYSCA/CERT'IFICATION FEES VENDOR TOTAL 105.00 105.00 09 CHORATH KANNANKUTTY 30598 05/30/90 05/30/90 65.00 65.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-2306-000000 AMT- 65.00 DESC-CHORATH KANNANKUTTY/REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 65.00 65.00 13 WMI SERVICES OF MINNE* 30599 05/30/90 000946 0.5/15/90 727.50 727.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-356000 AMT- 47.50 DESC-WMI SERVICES OF MN/PORTABLES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-356000 AMT- 680.00 DESC-WMI SERVICES OF MN/PORTABLES VENDOR TOTAL 727.50 727.50 18 DEPT OF NATURAL RESOUx :30600 05/30/90 05/30/90 515.00 515.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-125000 AMT- 515.00 DESC-DEPT OF NAT RES/WATER PERMIT VENDOR TOTAL 515.00 515.00 02 WILLIAM MAHN 30601 05/30/90 05/30/90 152.00 152.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 120.00 DESC-BILL MAHN/UMPIRE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020125 AMT- 32.00 DESC-BILL I'1AHN/UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 152.00 152.00 03 1- 'AY PLUS 30602 05/30/90 05/30/90 43.10 ftN43.10 AC T NUMBER- 100-4:350-:390000 AMT 4=x.10 DESC-HOLIDAY PLUS/MESSIAH SR PICNIC VENDOR TOTAL .43.10 4:3.10 ;E 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER •C10� MOUNDS VIEW MORNS' CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 10 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT 1 '.17 IKE MAURICIO 30603 05/30/90 05/30/90 120.00 120.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 AMT- 120.00 DESC-IKE MAURICIO/UMPIRE FEE VENDOR TOTAL 120.00 120.00 :80 A T & T 30604 05/50/90 05/30/90 11.15 11.13 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-310000 AMT- 11.13 DESC-AT&T/COMMUNICATIONS VENDOR TOTAL 11.15 11.1? X90 A T & T 30605 05/30/90 5154576056 05/02/90 3.96 3.96 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-310000 AMT- 3.96 DESC-AT&T/COMMUNICATIONS VENDOR TOTAL 3.96 3.96 OD AKONA CORPORATION 30606 05/30/90 22983 05/14/90 288.00 288.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 AMT'- 288.00 DESC-AKONA CORP/SUPPL.IES VENDOR TOTAL 288.00 288.00 85 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY* 30607 05/30/90 M17650521 05/21/90 14.95 14.95 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-355000 AMT- 14.95 DESC-AMERICAN LINEN/TOWELS VENDOR TOTAL 14.95 14.95 23 Al RICAN OFFICE PRODUx 30608 05/30/90 226808 05/18/90 61.73 61.73 A NT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 61.73 DESC-AMERICAN OFFICE/MISC SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL 61.73 61.73 59 AMERICAN PLANNING ASS* 30609 05/30/90 074235 04/19/90 123.00 123.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-361000 AMT- 123.00 DESC-AM PLANNING ASSOC/DUES-HREN VENDOR TOTAL 123.00 12:3.00 85 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASS* 30610 05/30/90 00096424 05/07/90 807.00 807.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-126000 AMT- 807.00 DESC-EARL ANDERSEN/SIGNS VENDOR TOTAL 807.00 807.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 275-4451-121000 AMT- 3. 39 DESC-BEISSWENGERS/GLOVES 30611 05/30/90 23A 05/11/90 12.17 12.17 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 275-4451-121000 AMT- 12.17 DESC-BEISSWENGER''S/FERTILIZER 30611 05/30/90 5:3A 05/18/90 13.99 13.99 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 275-4451-121000 AMT- 13.99 DESC-BEISSWENGER'S/WEED BLOCK 30611 05/30/90 05/30/90 10.51 10.51 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 10.51 DESC-BEISSWENGER''S/PARTS 30611 05/30/90 05/09/90 4.47 4.47 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- . 4.47 DESC-BEISSWENGER'S/CHAIN CLIP VENDOR TOTAL 44.53 44.53 00 BRIGHTON VETERINARY Mx 30612 05/30/90 04/30/90 148.00 148.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-303000 AMT- 148.00 DESC-BRIGHTON VET HOSP/APRIL CHARGE • VENDOR TOTAL 148.00 148.00 96 BUDGET DUISTRIBUTING,x 30613 05/30/90 107959 03/14/90 9.95 9.95 ... LE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER OA' MOUNDS VIEW DORW CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 0 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT T ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-114000 AMT- 9.95 DESC-BUDGET DISTRIBUTING/PART VENDOR TOTAL 9.95 9.95 80 CHEM LAWN 30614 05/30/90 204720 04/30/90 85.50 85.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 275-4451-121000 AMT- 85.50 DESC-CHEMLAWN/SPRING LAWN APPL VENDOR TOTAL 85.50 85.50 00 COAST TO COAST 30615 05/30/90 2632 05/17/90 2.59 2.59 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 AMT- 2.59 DESC-COAST TO COAST/TWINE 30615 05/30/90 2593 05/02/90 7.49 7.49 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 7.49 DESC-COAST TO COAST/TARP 30615 05/30/90 2825 05/10/90 1.09 1.09 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 1.09 DESC-COAST TO COAST/ELBOW 30615 05/30/90 2859 05/14/90 1.45 1.45 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 1.45 DESC-COAST TO COAST/BOLTS 30615 05/30/90 2620 05/16/90 6.25 6.25 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 6.25 DESC-COAST TO COAST/WEATHERSTRIP VENDOR TOTAL 18.87 18.87 00 COPY SALES 30616 05/30/90 00098943 05/14/90 12.65 12.65 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-112000 AMT- 12.65 DESC-COPY SALES/TONER 30616 05/30/90 00099070 05/15/90 824.20 824.20 A/����«T NUMBER- 100-4190-401000 AMT- 824.20 DESC-COPY SALES/MAY RENTAL ~���'. 30616 05/30/90 00098854 05/10/90 104.20 104.20 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-160000 AMT- 104.20 DESC-COPY SALES/TONER VENDOR TOTAL 941.05 941.05 40 COUNTRY CLUB MARKET 30617 05/30/90 04/27/90 33.13 33.13 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-390000 AMT- 33.13 DESC-COUNTRY CLUB MKT/GROCERIES VENDOR TOTAL 33.13 33.13 DO CY'S MENS WEAR 30618 05/30/90 44836 05/17/90 62.45 62.45 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-240000 AMT- 62.45 DESC-CY'S UNIFORMS/RECRUIT JACKET 30618 05/30/90 44698 05/03/90 68.40 68.40 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-240000 AMT- 68.40 DESC-CY'S UNIFORMS/SHIRTS 0618 05/30/90 44812 05/09/90 43.95 43.95 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-240000 AMT- 43.95 DESC-CY'S UNIFROMS/PANTS VENDOR TOTAL 174.80 174.80 Z5 FEDORS MARKET 30619 05/30/90 04/17/90 8.28 8.28 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-160000 AMT- 8.28 DESC-FEDOR'S MARKET/MISC GROCERIES VENDOR TOTAL 8.28 8.28 }O FEED-RITE CONTROLS IN* 30620 05/0/90 138547 05/01/90 1660.72 1660.72 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 1660.72 DESC-FEED-RITE CONTROLS/CHEMICALS VENDOR TOTAL 1660.72 1660.72 )0 4 SERVICE 30621 05/30/90 98185 O5/17/9O 17.50 17.50 AC 4T NUMBER- 100-4260-512000 AMT- 17.50 DESC-4X4/ALIGNMENT VENDOR TOTAL 17.50 17.50 GE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C10. MOUNDS VIEW ODOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK SIO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT 375 CITY OF FRIDLEY 30622 05/30/90 05/30/90 456.36 456.36 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 24.65 DESC-CITY OF FRIDLEY/UTILITY BILLS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 32.55 DESC-CITY OF FRIDLEY/UTILITY BILLS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 24.65 DESC-CITY OF FRIDLEY/UTILITY BILLS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 24.65 DESC-CITY OF FRIDLEY/UTILITY BILLS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 136.22 DESC-CITY OF FRIDLEY/UTILITY BILLS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 24.65 DESC-CITY OF FRIDLEY/UTILITY BILLS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 24.65 DESC-CITY OF FRIDLEY/UTILITY BILLS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 41.09 DESC-CITY OF FRIDLEY/UTILITY BILLS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 24.65 DESC-CITY OF FRIDLEY/UTILITY BILLS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 24.65 DESC-CITY OF FRIDLEY/UTILITY BILLS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 24.65 DESC-CITY OF FRIDLEY/UTILITY BILLS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 24.65 DESC-CITY OF FRIDLEY/UTILITY BILLS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-904000 AMT- 24.65 DESC-CITY OF FRIDLEY/UTILITY BILLS VENDOR TOTAL 456.36 456.36 380 ROGER L FREDSALL INC. :30624 05/30/90 1770 05/17/90 99.60 99.60 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 99.60 DESC•-ROGER L FREDSALL/PARTS VENDOR TOTAL 99.60 99.60 )40 G CAPITAL CORPORATIx 30625 05/30/90 04431578 05/13/90 300.97 :300.97 A NT NUMBER- 100-4190-310000 ANT- 300.97 DESC-G E CAPITAL/MONTHLY LEASE VENDOR TOTAL 300.97 300.97 380 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALLx 30626 05/30/90 490318 05/02/90 205.00 205.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-303000 AMT- 205.00 DESC-GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL/APRIL VENDOR TOTAL 205.00 205.00 '55 W W GRAINGER INC 30627 05/30/90 497-887594-8 05/09/90 100.80 100.80 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-121000 AMT- 100.80 DESC-W W GRAINGER/PART VENDOR TOTAL 100.80 100.80 ,L4_, .7 - . 1 :;.a.4_, _1 - .• 6 _1 j-• S i. : ;..=. ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-160119 ANT- 44.49 DESC-INSTY-PRINTS/PRINTING ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-160244 AMT- 44.49 DESC-INSTY-PRINTS/PRINTII.4G VENDOR TOTAL 88.98 88.98 110 J C AUTO SUPPLY ;30629 05/30/90 59196 05/15/90 11.43 11.43 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-120000 AMT- 11.43 DESC-J C AUTO/HEADLIGHT 30629 05/30/90 59220 05/15/90 22.86 22.86 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 22.86 DESC-J C AUTO/HEADLIGHTS VENDOR TOTAL 34.29 34.29 50 LMCIT HEALTH PROTECTI?e :30630 05/30/90 303092 05/09/90 1553.00 1553.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-480000 ANT- 1533,00 DESC-LMCIT INS/MULTI-PERIL. ENDORSMT 30630 05/30/90 303093 05/09/90 17911.00 17911.00 AI NT NUMBER- 100-4190-480000 AMT- 17911.00 DESC-LPICIT INS/MULTI-PERIL 30630 05/30/90 847 05/07/90 814.00 814.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-480000 AMT- 814.00 DESC-NO STAR RISK/BOND RENEWAL 3E ili ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -C1 MOUNDS VIEW IDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 40 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 20278.00 20278.00 255 L M C I T 30631 05/30/90 02-821 05/01/90 14736.25 14736.25 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-050000 AMT- 53.05 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-050000 AMT- 324.20 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER`S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-050000 AMT- 56.00 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER''S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-050000 AMT- 390.51 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-050000 AMT- 16.21 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER''S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-050000 AMT- 6788.99 DESC-LMCIT/WOR}(ER'S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-050000 AMT- 16.21 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-050000 AMT- 57.47 DESC-LMCIT/WORKERS COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-050000 AMT- 241.67 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'`S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-050000 AMT- 1943.71 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER`'S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-050000 AMT- 854.70 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4:60-050000 AMT- 692.60 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-050000 AMT- 17.69 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-050000 AMT- 2.95 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-050000 AMT- 4.42 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-050000 AMT- 17.69 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-050000 AMT- 97.26 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 275-4451-050000 AMT- 73.68 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP 40A " UNT NUMBER- 700-4120-050000 ANT- 475.98 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP JNT NUMBER- 700-4121-050000 AMT- 456.82 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP AC OUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-050000 AMT- 442.09 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-050000 AMT- 1712.35 DESC-LMCIT/WORKER'S COMP VENDOR TOTAL 14736.25 147;6.25 45 LILLIE SURURBAN NEWS 30634 05/30/90 37851 04/30/90 71.07 71.07 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-341000 AMT- 18.35 DESC-LILLIE NEWS/ADS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-341000 AMT- 34.82 DESC-LILLIE NEWS/ADS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-341000 AMT- 17.40 DESC-LILLIE NEWS/ADS VENDOR TOTAL 71.07 71.07 )00 LORENZ BUS SERVICE, Ix 30635 05/30/90 901:41 / -• .'i •' ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-401000 AMT- 117.00 DESC-LORENZ BUS SERV/FORD PLANT VENDOR TOTAL 117.00 117.00 ,30 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT Ix :30636 05/30/90 5994 05/08/90 10:00.00 10300.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100•-4360-703000 ANT- 10300.00 DESC-MACQUEEN/HUSTLER ('+(' �j (' (� } `'� 306::36 05/30/90 5227 yy [± 05/16/905( [C p20.51 20.51 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-12-:000 AMT- 20.51 DESC-MACQUEEN/SPRING 30636 05/30/90 5290 05/16/90 31.47 31.47 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-123000 AMT- 31.47 DESC-MACQUEEN/FILTER CARTRIDGE 30636 05/30/90 4808 05/0:3/90 17.86 17.86 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-123000 AMT- 17.86 DESC-MACQUEEN/FILTER 30636 05/30/90 4795 05/00/90 227.78 227.78 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-123000 AMT- 227.78 DESC-MACQUEEN/PARTS 30636 05/30/90 5043 05/10/90 18.08 18.08 AgitJNT NUMBER- 100-4260-123000 AMT- 18.08 DESC-MACOUEEN/FILTERS VENDOR TOTAL. 10615.70 10615.70 OE co ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK. REGISTER -Cl' MOUNDS VIEW :NDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNTCHECK NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT X470 MAGUIRE AGENCY INC 30637 05/30/90 11182 04/10/90 4288.00 4288.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-480000 AMT- 4288.00 DESC-MAGUIRE AGY/BOILER-MACHINERY VENDOR TOTAL 4288.00 4288.00 800 MAUST FIBER FUELS, INA 30638 05/30/90 3605 05/08/90 532.00 532.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120--160000 ANT- 532.00 DESC-MAUST TIRE RECYCLERS/CLEAN-UP VENDOR TOTAL 532.00 532.00 170 METRO WASTE CONTROL Cx 30639 05/30/90 04/30/90 2376.00 2376.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-3822-000000 ANT- 2376.00 DESC-MWCC/APRIL SAC FEES 30639 05/30/90 513206 05/0.1/90 44507.99 44507.99 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-323000 AMT- 44507.99 DESC-MWCC/JUNE SEWER CHARGES VENDOR TOTAL 4688:3.99 46883.99 415 MICROFACS, INC. :30640 05/30/90 :3652 05/16/90 87.78 87.78 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 87.78 DESC-MICROFACS/TONER VENDOR TOTAL 87.78 87.78 442 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPOx 30641 05/30/90 020263 05/11/90 102.90 102.90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-124000 ANT- 102.90 DESC-MIDWEST ASPHALT/SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL 102.90 102.90 443 M DWEST ELEVATORS 30642 05/30/90 1807 05/18/90 102.95 102.95 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-511000 ANT- 40.00 DESC-MIDWEST ELEVATORS/MAY SERVICE ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-511000 ANT- 62.95 DESC-MIDWEST ELEVATORS/REPAIR VENDOR TOTAL 102.95 102.95 500 RIC IINETOR 30643 05/30/90 05/30/90 128.16 128.16 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700.4120-363000 ANT- 128.16 DESC-RIC MINETOR/CONF EXPENSES VENDOR TOTAL 128.16 128.16 850 MINNESOTA CELLULAR TEx 30644 05/30/90 02454056 05/18/90 4.95 4.95 A LIJ '!- . - I - ,• -:3 •srs - - . ., - I • IN , I - - - H" VENDOR TOTAL 4.95 4.95 300 MN GOV FIN OFF ASSOC :30645 05/30/90 05/30/90 528.00 528.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100--4150-363000 ANT- 528.00 DESC-MN GFOA/CONF EXP-BRAGER VENDOR TOTAL 528.00 528.00 210 CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON 30646 05/30/90 05/30/90 4250.00 4250.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 275-4450-0.10000 ANT- 4250.00 DESC-C OF NB/FORESTER`S SALARY VENDOR TOTAL 4250.00 4250.00 515 NORTH STAR RISK SERVIx :.:0647 05/30/90 05/16/90 814.00 814.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-480000 AMT- 814.00 DE SC-NORTH s•rAR RISK/BOND RENEWAL VENDOR TOTAL 881.4.00 814.00 200 i HERN STATES POWERx 30648 05/30/90 05/30/90 5.56 5.56 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-42.30-321000 ANT- 5.56 DESC-NSF/1/55 CO RD I 3E Alk ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -CAW MOUNDS VIEW ODOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 40 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT VENDOR TOTAL 5.56 5.56 580 PAPER PRODUCTS PLUS 30649 05/30/90 201839 05/22/90 28.85 28.85 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 28.85 DESC-PAPER PRODUCTS PLUS/HOT CUPS VENDOR TOTAL 28.85 28.85 580 DONALD PAULEY 30650 05/30/90 05/30/90 150.00 150.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-380000 AMT- 150.00 DESC-DONALD PAULEY/MILEAGE VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 150.00 575 PINE CONE NURSERY/GARx 30651 05/30/90 0061 05/09/90 166.60 166.60 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 275-4451-121000 AMT- 166.60 DESC-PINE CONE NURSERY/SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL 166.60 166.60 ?35 PONY EXPRESS COURIER x 30652 05/30/90 16103420 04/18/90 5.95 5.95 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-513000 AMT- 5.95 DESC-PONY EXPRESS/COURIER 30652 05/30/90 16097839 03/14/90 6.50 6.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-513000 AMT- 6.50 DESC-PONY EXPRESS/COURIER VENDOR TOTAL 12.45 12.45 r80 POWER UP SOFTWARE COR* 30653 05/30/90 0757275029 05/14/90 29.95 29.95 AUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-160000 AMT- 29.95 DESC-POWER UP SOFTWARE/ACTION FLNNR 30653 05/30/90 0757275003 05/08/90 48.90 48.90 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-160000 AMT- 48.90 DESC-POWER UP SOFTWARE/NO SQUINT VENDOR TOTAL 78.85 78.85 560 TIMOTHY RAMACHER 30654 05/30/90 2373 05/04/90 28.68 28.68 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-704000 AMT- 28.68 DESC-TIM RAMACHER/SQUAD NUMBERS VENDOR TOTAL 28.68 28.68 )00 RAMSEY RECYCLING, INC)6 30655 05/30/90 05/15/90 2571.25 2571.25 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290--4121-303000 AMT- 2571.25 DESC-RAMSEY RECYCLING/APRIL RECYCLE VENDOR TOTAL 2571.25 2571.25 700 HANS ROSACKER CO 30656 05/30/90 19521 05/23/90 238.40 238.40 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 275-4451-121000 AMT- 238.40 DESC-HANS ROSACKER/PLANTS VENDOR TOTAL 238.40 238.40 ?50 PAM ROSE 30657 05/30/90 050290 05/02/90 78.00 78.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-41.10-020000 AMT- 78.00 DESC-PAMELA ROSE/MINUTES 05-02-90 30657 05/30/90 051490 05/14/90 78.00 78.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-020000 ANT- 78.00 DESC-PAM ROSE/MINUTES 05-14-90 VENDOR TOTAL 156.00 156.00 400 MARY SAARION 30658 05/50/90 05/10/90 25.80 25.80 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-380000 AMT- 4.68 DESC-MARY SAARION/MILEAGE AUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-114000 AMT- 21.12 DESC-MARY SAARION/CABLE COMM. MTC; VENDOR TOTAL 25.80 25.80 550 ST PAUL BOOK & STATION 30659 05/30/90 009157 05/11/90 17.12 17.12 = GEACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -Cl MOUNDS VIEW NDOR�w� CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160080 AMT- 4.28 DESC-ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY/FLDR ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160034 AMT- 4.28 DESC-ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY/FLDR ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160038 AMT- 4.28 DESC-ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY/FLDR ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160033 AMT- 4.28 DESC-ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY/FLDR 30659 05/30/90 000163 03/27/90 10.76 10.76 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160011 AMT- 5.38 DESC-ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY/STKR ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160039 AMT- 5.38 DESC-ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY/STKR VENDOR TOTAL 27.88 27.88 225 SHORT ELLIOTT & HENDR* 30660 05/30/90 7263 04/26/90 453.51 453.51 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-303000 AMT- 453.51 DESC-SEH/TEST WELL #4 VENDOR TOTAL 453.51 453.51 505 SNYDERS DRUG STORES 30661 05/30/90 59251 05/17/90 18.99 18.99 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 18.99 DESC-SNYDER DRUGS/FILM 30661 05/30/90 40450 05/18/90 7.58 7.58 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160033 AMT- 7.58 DESC-SNYDER DRUGS/PLASTIC BAGS 30661 05/30/90 40446 05/03/90 63.75 63.75 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-160000 AMT- 63.75 DESC-SNYDER DRUGS/FILM 30661 05/0/90 40447 05/04/90 8.98 8.98 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 AMT- 8.98 DESC-SNYDER DRUGS/TRASH BAGS 30661 05/30/90 59252 05/21/90 20.70 20.70 Al-, NT NUMBER- 250-4353-160205 AMT- 8.88 DESC-SNYDER DRUGS/FILM ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-390000 AMT- 11.82 DESC-SNYDER DRUGS/PICNIC SUPPLIES 30661 05/30/90 59254 05/23/90 41.76 41.76 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-160000 AMT- 41.76 DESC-SNYDER DRUGS/FILM & FLASH 30661 05/30/90 40448 05/08/90 2.79 2.79 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 2.79 DESC-SNYDER DRUGS/FILM PROCESSING VENDOR TOTAL 164.55 164.55 200 CITY OF SPRING LAKE P* 30663 05/0/90 423 05/15/90 53.00 53.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-160000 AMT- 53.00 DESC-C OF SLP/SWEEP LAKESIDE LOT VENDOR TOTAL 53.00 53.00 250 SPRING LAKE PARK FIRE* 30664 05/30/90 05/16/90 12572.00 12572.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4210-390000 AMT- 12572.00 DESC-C OF SLP FIRE/OCTOBER VENDOR TOTAL 12572.00 12572.00 100 STAR SPORTS 30665 05/30/90 5899 05/18/90 26.95 26.95 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160038 AMT- 26.95 DESC-STAR SPORTS/CHEST PROTECTORS VENDOR TOTAL 26.95 26.95 10O DON STREICHER GUNS 30666 05/30/90 M71054 05/04/90 129.00 129.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-704000 AMT- 129.00 DESC-STREICHER'S/SPEAKER VENDOR TOTAL 129.00 129.00 05 AMERICA 30667 05/30/90 0140314/4264 O5/08/90 94.80 94.80 A����&uT NUMBER- 100-4200-170000 AMT- 94.80 DESC-SUPERAMERICA/OIL ���' 94 80 VENDOR TDTAL 94.8O . 3E ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER -Cl MOUNDS VIEW 4DOR~~- CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 10 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT 150 TAMS-WITMARK MUSIC LI* 30668 05/3O/90 32355 05/01/90 7.75 7.75 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-160213 AMT- 7.75 DESC-TAMS-WITMARK MUSIC LIB/THEATRE VENDOR TOTAL 7.75 7.75 225 TEXGAS 30669 05/30/90 023684 05/02/90 8.50 8.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 8.50 DESC-TEXGAS/AIR FILTER VENDOR TOTAL 8.50 8.50 '70 TRANS-TECH ASSOCIATES* 30670 05/30/90 304979 05/04/90 2040.52 2040.52 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-703000 AMT- 2040.52 DESC-TRANS-TECH/TRAFICOMP VENDOR TOTAL 2040.52 2040.52 WO TRUCK UTILITIES MFG C* 30671 05/30/90 050552-00 05/15/90 22.81 22.81 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-122000 AMT- 22.81 DESC-TRUCK UTILITIES/CHAINS VENDOR TOTAL 22.81 22.81 100 U S WEST 30672 05/30/90 05/30/90 1331.21 1331.21 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-310000 AMT- 50.95 DESC-U S WEST/784-4349 B001122 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-310000 AMT- 50.25 DESC-U S WEST/784-9871 496 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-310000 AMT- 19.69 DESC-U S WEST/784-1076 395 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-310000 ANT- 19.69 DESC-U S WEST/784-1305 396 Amipir NUMBER- 100-4360-310000 AMT- 19.69 DESC-U S WEST/784-0470 394 AmpuNT NUMBER- 100-4360-310000 AMT- 8.36 DESC-U S WEST/784-1323 397 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-310000 AMT- 790.36 DESC-U S WEST/784-3055 420 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-310000 AMT- 129.00 DESC-U S WEST/E07-1580 574 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-310000 AMT- 29.62 DESC-U S WEST/E23-4126 687 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-310000 AMT- 16.24 DESC-U S WEST/E83-0213 517 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-310000 AMT- 16.24 DESC-U S WEST/E83-0214 518 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-310000 AMT- 16.24 DESC-U S WEST/E83-0216 520 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-310000 AMT- 16.24 DESC-U S WEST/E83-0217 523 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-310000 AMT- 16.24 DESC-U S WEST/E83-0053 177 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-310000 AMT- 16.24 DESC-U S WEST/E83-0059 255 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-310000 AMT- 53.90 DESC-U S WEST/E83-0242 256 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-310000 ANT- 19.69 DESC-U S WEST/780-1908 878 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-310000 AMT- 42.57 DESC-U S WEST/484-9155 420 VENDOR TOTAL 1331.21 1331.21 00 UNITOG RENTALS SYSTEM 30674 05/30/90 2832740511 05/11/90 109.03 109.03 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-240000 ANT- 109.03 DESC-UNITOG/UNIFORM RENTAL 30674 05/30/90 2832740518 05/18/90 86.37 86.37 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-240000 AMT- 86.37 DESC-UNITOG/UNIFORM RENTALS VENDOR TOTAL 195.40 195.40 00 VAN - 0 - LITE 30675 05/30/90 00627940 05/10/90 39.84 39.84 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-121000 AMT- 39.84 DESC-VAN 0 LITE/LIGHT VENDOR TOTAL 39.84 39.84 OONG CHEVROLET 30676 05/30/90 03/02/90 5.64 5.64 A[���)NT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 5.64 DESC-VIKING CHEVROLET/PARTS - . . ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER C1O E ���� MOUNDS VIEW DOR CHECK CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 0 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT T 00 VIKINGS APPROVED SAFE* 30677 05/30/90 H391197 05/03/90 36.50 36.50 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-160000 AMT- 36.50 DESC-VIKING SAFETY PROD/BARRIER TP VENDOR TOTAL 36.50 36.50 00 ZAHL EQUIPMENT COMPAN* 30678 05/30/90 0016437-IN 05/11/90 29.16 29.16 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-160000 AMT- 29.16 DESC-ZAHO EQUIP/PUMP HOSE VENDOR TOTAL 29.16 29.16 00 ZEP MANUFACTURING COM* 30679 05/30/90 57299437 05/11/90 398.40 / 398.40 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 398.40 DESC-ZEP/SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL 398.40 398.40 GRAND TOTAL 135952.60 135952.60 • 0 E ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER C104 MOUNDS VIEW DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 0 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT 55 DONALD BRAGER 168 05/17/90 05/17/90 168.80 168.30 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-363000 AMT- 168.80 DESC-DON BRAGER/CONF EXPENSE VENDOR TOTAL 168.80 168.80 65 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 30254 05/08/90 05/08/90 65.82 65.82 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-160000 AMT- 3.18 DESC-C OF MV/PETTY CASH FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-362000 AMT- 6.47 DESC-C OF MV/PETTY CASH FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-380000 AMT- 5.74 DESC-C OF MV/PETTY CASH FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4353-160205 AMT- 10.95 DESC-C OF MV/PETTY CASH FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160030 AMT- 8.16 DESC-C OF MV/PETTY CASH FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-160000 AMT- 3.60 DESC-C OF MV/PETTY CASH FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-330000 AMT- .75 DESC-C OF MV/PETTY CASH FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-114000 AMT- 17.16 DESC-C OF MV/PETTY CASH FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-363000 AMT- 7.26 DESC-C OF MV/PETTY CASH FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-343000 AMT- 2.55 DESC-C OF MV/PETTY CASH FUND VENDOR TOTAL 65.82 65.82 00 HICKOK, KITTY 30255 05/08/90 05/08/90 45.60 45.60 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-363000 AMT- 45.60 DESC-KITTY HICKOK/MILEAGE (� (� (� VENDOR TOTAL 45.60 45.60 55 ON SAND AND GRAVEx 30256 05/10/90 05/10/90 2799. 38 2799.38 ANENT NUMBER- 410-4120-705000 AMT- 699.84 DESC-BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-121000 ANT- 2099.54 DESC-BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO VENDOR TOTAL 2799.38 2799.38 30 SHARON LINKE :30260 05/10/90 05/10/90 :=0.29 30.29 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-380000 AMT-- 30.29 DESC-SHARON LINKE/MILEAGE VENDOR TOTAL 30.29 30.29 15 ARMSTRONG COURIER 30261 05/15/90 05/15/90 24.00 24.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-303000 ANT- 24.00 DESC-ARMSTRONG COURIER/DELIVERY VENDOR TOTAL 24.00 24.00 30 MN OFFICE OF WASTE MAX 30262 05/16/90 05/16/90 80.00 :30.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-363000 AMT- 30.00 DESC-MN OFFICE OF WASTE ED-HREN VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 :30.00 36 FIRSTAR NEW BRIGHTON x 30263 05/18/90 05/30/90 58501.69 58501.69 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-010000 AMT- 3164.20 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-010000 AMT- 1698.81 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-010000 AMT- 3271.90 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-010000 AMT- 2430.92 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-010000 ANT- 672.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-020000 AMT-- 160.00 DESC--FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-010000 AMT- 21568.12 DESC-FIRSrAR/5-18 WAGES AC NT NUMBER- 100-4200-011000 AMT- 159.94 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES A T NUMBER- 100-4200-020000 ANT- 443.10 DESC-FIRSTAR:5-18 WAGES ACC UNT NUMBER- 100-4230-010000 AMT- 650.43 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-020000 ANT- 284.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES E ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAIL CHECK REGISTER C10 MOUNDS VIEW DOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 0 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT 1 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-010000 AMT- 1055.04 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-011000 ANT- 75.36 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-010000 AMT- 2574.82 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-011000 ANT- 186.90 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-010000 AMT- 2764.19 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-020000 AMT- 958.90 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-13 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-010000 ANT- 2093.48 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-011000 AMT- 841.05 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4.60-020000 ANT- 322.50 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020002 ANT- 378.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020011 AMT- 190.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020039 AMT- 28.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-13 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020040 AMT- 400.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020042 ANT- 82.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-020119 ANT- 35.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4554-020226 ANT- 14.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020229 AMT- 70.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020231 ANT- 42.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4::54-02023:; ANT- 161.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020234 ANT- 252.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020237 ANT- 119.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES AC NT NUMBER- 250-4354-020238 AMT- 28.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACIOWNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020239 AMT- 103.25 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020241 ANT- 14.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020244 ANT- 154.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020250 ANT- 119.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-02025: ANT- 105.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020254 ANT- 28.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020255 ANT- 98.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020256 AMT- 49.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 260-4121-020000 AMT- 224.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-020000 ANT- 558.50 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 275-4451-020000 AMT- 596.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-010000 - - - .; 2 - - - - r:}- ' ° 1 - ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-010000 ANT- 2332.20 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-010000 AMT- 2093.28 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-011000 ANT- :308.39 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-010000 AMT- 2017.70 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-010000 ANT- 2093.55 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-011000 ANT- 401.84 DESC-FIRSTAR/5-18 WAGES 30264 05/18/90 05/18/90 2434.48 2434.48 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-030000 AMT- 236.86 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-030000 AMT- 129.95 DESC-FIIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-030000 AMT- .233.54 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-030000 AMT- 185.98 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-030000 ANT- 51.41 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACNT NUMBER- 100-4190-031000 ANT- 2. 32 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS AC T NUMBER- 100-4200-030000 ANT- 104.95 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACC NT NUMBER- 100-4200-031000 ANT- 36.08 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-030000 AMT- 21.7:3 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS = � . ' E Aft ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER C1A1� MOUNDS VIEW -� MORCHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 0 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-030000 AMT- 83.45 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-030000 AMT- 198.94 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-030000 AMT- 263.84 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-030000 AMT- 220.89 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-031000 AMT- 4.68 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-030000 AMT- 1.53 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-031000 AMT- 15.36 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-030000 AMT- 2.68 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-030000 AMT- 1.07 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-031000 AMT- 19.45 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 260-4121-031000 AMT- 3.25 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-031000 AMT- 8.10 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 275-4451-031000 AMT- 8.64 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-030000 AMT- 2.40 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-030000 AMT- 184.06 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-030000 AMT- 174.62 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-030000 AMT- 110.00 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-030000 AMT- 178.70 DESC-FIRSTAR/PENSIONS VENDOR TOTAL 60936.17 60936.17 '00 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 30265 05/18/90 05/30/90 3938.68 3938.68 AilliNT NUMBER- 100-4120-033000 ANT- 44.58 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ANOINT NUMBER- 100-4130-033000 ANT- 76.10 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-033000 AMT- 146.58 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-033000 AMT- 46.77 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-033000 AMT- 30.11 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-033000 AMT- 61.46 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-034000 AMT- 2495.90 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-084000 AMT- 78.06 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-033000 AMT- 12.73 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-033000 AMT- 50.64 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-033000 AMT- 123.71 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-033000 AMT- 166.79 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-033000 AMT- 131.48 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-033000AMT- .90 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4352-033000 AMT- 1.57 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-033000 AMT- .63 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-033000 AMT- 1.40 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-032000 AMT- 47.21 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-033000 AMT- 84.77 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-033000 AMT- 107.59 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-032000 AMT- 47.21 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-033000 AMT- 70.69 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-033000 AMT- 111.80 DESC-PERA/PENSIONS VENDOR TOTAL 3938.68 3938.68 /50 RETIREMENT CORPOx 30266 05/18/90 05/30/90 194.36 194.36 A����0uT NUMBER- 1OO-412O-O35OOO AMT- 194.36 DESC-ICMA/PENSION-PAULEY "���" NUMBER- VENDOR TOTAL 194.36 194.36 9E A& ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE-PAID CHECK REGISTER -Clt MOUNDS VIEW IDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHECK 10 VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT )00 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 30267 05/17/90 05/17/90 90.00 90.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-901000 AMT- 90.00 DESC-C OF MV/REFUND--2081 HILLVIEW VENDOR TOTAL 90.00 90.00 100 MARY SAARION 30269 05/17/90 05/17/90 18.79 18.79 ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-160000 AMT- 18.79 DESC-MARY SAARION/CABLE COMM-DONUTS VENDOR TOTAL 18.79 18.79 GRAND TOTAL 68341.89 68341.89 III 1111 9.� RESOLUTION NO. 3041 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT AND EASEMENT VACATIONS FOR MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARR-SOUTH, PLANNING CASE NO. 259-89 WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council reviewed the request by the Everest Group for final plat approval and easement vacations for the Mounds View Business Park-South project; and WHEREAS the Mounds View City Council has reviewed City Engineer Ric Minetor's memo dated May 21, 1990, addressing the final plat and easement vacations; and WHEREAS, this final plat must be recorded with Ramsey County in accordance with Mounds View Subdivision Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View approves of the requested final plat and vacation easement for the Mounds View Business Park-South project. • Adopted this 29th day of May, 1990. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Administrator • 1 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUN I : • FROM. CLERK-ADMINISTRATO: A�` DATE: May 23, 1990 SUBJECT: CITY HALL SPACE NEEDS STUDY CONTRACT Attached please find the proposed contract between the City of Mounds View and the Alliance for the 1990 City Hall Space Needs Study. Should you find this contract to be acceptable, staff would recommend that you approve the contract as presented. DFP/mjs • tine ., zi,..1 1 .4. w.4 rm...,11 rirr.-ntia... tymmi- 1-11-1.- lMW- Pax Leadsheet The Alliance ARCHITEGTUItt PLANNING INTIRIGItS 0 DATE SIN—I': ----5 A/ / 1 0 .. . M 0 ti 64 uf ViL4) eir, ii, - - ' ' --rwzr-- ---,-- ----• A . _.___L_k_tr-_t__) TTENTION: 4 . pCOMMAtiLeNO: SUBJECT: - FAX NO: is fill Le fy iI400 ifriff pry NO.OF PAM(Inci•this Page): 6 J We are sending you the following: Drawings Specifications -- Correspondence I I 11M11 No.co ies Sheet no. Descri-tion • / S Cr C 0 Ai ift.Air /:),1„.049 A r Sm. /4 tio M / ser Eg.Ai /' /r 'ó ' 5 0 TM 10 A- mg) r/2,./ 1 o _ IIIFor approval Accepted as noted For review&comment --- As requested , For distribution Revise St resubmit —11%, For your use L---1 --- REM4RKS: you- H .tfi vg.) eP tei iie I 7 Aw0 P o ii. A i.. i 4 ,41frce ..r ...AJ..14 ./c/4 Ciiiii,Sr/7ure.. 4. c.4 /4 / IS J r 'AI ' .. . 4. 0 4. C it- A Ap, 4 i ik) re) m I Meit,44,1,). . ( r efiii ) $47. r 1.0 Aimi . r.H ,gg.. . i ......__:_L_..___k4w ' . Please notify us immediately if you donot 70- 412.1 thin tr47tStgiSSIOA as?toted above. Ali BY: ,..,_. WI (...: 400 Clifton Avenue South. Minne2polis,Minn sots 55403;612/3714703;Fox 61215714212 • • IL • •AMERICAN INSTITUTE O f ARCHITECTS 011914 • • DRAFT AIA Document 13727 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect for Special Services 1988 EDITION THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITI1 AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFIC'A77ON AGREEMENT made as of the Twenty-first day of May in the year of Nineteen Hundred and Ninety • SBETWEEN the Owner: City of Mounds View (Name and address) 2401 Highway No. 10 Mounds View, MN .55112 and the Architect: The All lance (Name and address) 400 Clifton Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 • For the following Project: (include detailed description of-Pro/ea, lOiation, addrers and scope) • City Hall/Police Space Needs Study City of Mounds View Mounds View, MN • The Owner and the Architect agree as set forth below • Copyright 1972, 1979, ©1938 by The.RIetiC1n Institute of AtchttcCts. 1735 Near York Avenue.,`:\\".,Wasi.utgtQrt. 0.C.2%C . Reproduction of the material herein of subsuntu^r1 quotation of its provisions 7.ittout Atrium petrestion ci the Ali\Vit)i.rC. the copyright laws of the United States Ind will be subject to leg-11 prosecacion. ALA OOCLia.ENT 8727•OVisERARCHITECt AGREEMBN:• 19:'42 EDmT3OH•A.A• • 19ng•TRE A Ih 1UP;INSTITUTE Or ARCHITECTS,17SS N$10 YORK AVENUE,t.w..W,tismmt;TON,D.C.20006 8727-1988 1 • WARN NG.;Unnasoosd peotoczpyinp rtotates tAZ.:mit Um and is estisct to iegad prose Ion. • ARTICLE 1 ARCHITECT'S SERVICES io Moro tom +servicos 10 be provided by Abe Ae r trtd /� i�:fA under 7!►m3 dr Conditions of*LsA4n+ti+rnent.Not*under Bath 4er'vk ,r ifsf d the snos od and meant • Refer to Exhibit 'A' Proposal for: City of Mounds View City Nall/Police Space Needs Study Prepared by: The Alliance 400 Clifton Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 Dated: May 2, 1990 Refer also to Exhibit *F31 1990 Space Needs Study • work Program Prepared by: Donald -Paul.ey Clerk-Administrator City of Mounds View Dated: May 16, 1990 • • MA DOCUMENT 8777•UWNER.ARC'riIT$cT AoaRtMP!• I9.98 EDi-T 3 •A:ta •vI9$ti•THE AMF.R1c&t I.^ISTITUTE OF ARCHITECT'S., i735 VE`x,YORK AV_N E.ti:a. '77ArMiNGTOrr,:?.C.2(K,NG 3727-1988 2 MORNING:WA:s ued ppfctoeaming Ti01ltas U$.Cr h if11 !4144001 iLP1 pecxyc acct. el r 21 ' 90 14: 02 FROM ARCHITECTURAL I ILLI ANC PAGE , 005 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWbEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT III . ARTICLE 2 matter in question not described in the written consent or with a person or entity not named or described therein.The OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES foregoing agreement to arbitrate and other agreements to arbi- trate with an additional person or entity duly consented to 2.1 The Owner shall provide full information regarding by the parties to this Agreement shall be specifically enforce- requirements for the Project. The Owner shall furnish able in accordance with applicable law in any court having required information IS expeditiously as necessary for the jurisdiction thereof. orderly progress of the Work.and the Architect shall be enti- fied to rely on the accuracy and completeness thereof. 4,4 The award rendered by the arbitrator or arbitrators shell be final.and judgement may be entered upon it in accordance 2.2 The Owner shall designate a represenrativc authorized with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. to act on the Owner's behalf with respect to the Project.The Owner or such authorized representative shall render ieri- ARTICLE 5 sions in a timely manner pertaining to.documents submitted by the Architect In order to avoid unreasonable delay In the TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION orderly and sequential progress of the Architect's services. 5.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon ARTICLE 3 not less than seven days'written notice should the other parry USE OF ARCHITECT'S DOCUMENTS fail substantially to perform in accordance with the terms 01 this Agreement through no fault of the party initiating the termination. 3.1 The documents prepared by the Architect for this Projt cct are instruments of the Architect's service for use solely 5.2 If the Owner fails to make payment when due the Arehi- with respect to this Project and,unless otherwise provided, met for services and expenses,the Architect may,upon seven the Architect shall be deemed the author of these documents days' written notice to the Owner, suspend performance of and shall retain all common law,statutory and other reserved services under this Agreement. Unless payment in full is rights,including the copyright. The Owner shall be permit- received by the Architect within seven days of the date of the ted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of the notice,the suspension shell take effect wit:tc?tar further notice rchitcers documents for the Owner's information,reference In the event of a suspension of services. the Architect shall and use in connection with the Project. Architect's The docu- have no liability to the Owner net delay or damage caused mcnts shall not be used by the Owner or others on other proj- the Owner because of such suspension of services. ects, for additions to this Project or for Completion of this 5.3 In the event of termination not the fault of the Architect, Project by others, unless the Architect is adjudged to be in the Architect shall be compensated for services performed default under this Agreement,except by agreement in writing and with appropriate compensation to the Architect. then to tcrmiration, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due and all Termination Expenses as defined in Paragraph 5.4. ARTICLE 4 SA Termination Expenses shall be computed as a percentage ARBITRATION of the compensation earned to the rime of termination, as follows:• 4.1 Claims.disputes or other matters in question between the .1 for services provided on the basis of a multiple of attics toth'_• A- em-n '. . . . . e. Agreement or breach thereof shall be subject to and decided Direct Personnel Expense incurred to the rime of ter- by arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry mination; and Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association cur• .2 Pot ser/ices provided on the bassi;of a stipulated sum, renrir in effect unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. 10 percent oft e stipulated sum earned to the time 4.2 A demand for arbitration stall be made within a reason- of termination. able time after the claim,dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In no event shall the demand for arbitration be ARTICLE 5 made after the date when institution of legal or equitable pro- ceedings based on such claim.dispute or other matter in quer- MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS tion would be barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. 4.3 No arbitration arising out of or relatingKr this Agreement S 1 Unless tithe-lis provided,this Agreement shall tie gm:- rtcd by the law of the principal place of business of the shall include.by consolidation,joinder or in any ocher man- Architect. net,an additional person or entity not a party to this Agree- ment,except by written consent containing a specific refer- 8.2 Causes of action between the parties to this.Agreetnent Ince to this Agreement signed by the Owner. Architect and pertaining to acts or failUtcs LC} act shall be deemed to have v other person or entity sought to be joined. Consent to accrued and the applicable .,ranine of limitations •hall corn- ittation involving an additional person or entity shat not hence to run not'leter than the date payment is due the ArChi- coristitutc consent to arbitration of any claim,dispute or other tect pursuant to Paragraph b.-c. _ AU tlOCUMEt(T VW•OW,N_R-ARc4ITEC AGREEMENT•1.9an ED1T1ot•MAI •^yt08S•THE rtMEIUCAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1733 r+r v'i'O x 1YENi:E,N.V.,VAShINCTOPI.D.C.hoot,,; B727.1988 3 MNaparic t Ufa cartes ptltaccopying.iatatat u evpy.fsittt Isms and is fret to 11,-,Tt pc tuition. - MAY 21 ' 90 14 : 02 FROM ARCHITECTURAL ALL I ANC. PAGE . 004 $.3 The Owner and Architect,respectively,bind themselves, tett and Architect's employees and consultants in the interest their partners,successors.assigns and legal representatives to of the Project for: other party to this Agreement and to the partners,sue- .1 expense of trap poradon and living expenses in Illcon- essors,assigns and legal representadves of such other party section with out-of town travel authorised by the with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Neither Owner; Owner nor Architect shall assign this Agreement without the .2 Iong-distance commutmzitions; written consent of the other. .3 fees paid for securing approval of authorities hay- 6.4 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agree- Ing jurisdiction over the Project; rent between the Owner and Architect and supersedes all .4 reproductions; prior negotiations, representations or agreements,either writ- ,5 postage and handling of documents; ten or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by writ- eta, -efseseirsties-n tk-.segaitiege''flgne:-t'�aai ten Instrument signed by both Owner and Architect. `e8e -rawer i€-es tlfi.1teci•by.shC-9r>y 8-3 Nothing contained In this Agreement shall create a con- .7 renderings and models requested by the Owner; traetuat relationship with or a cause of action in favor of s ,g CrpCnSe of additional coverage or limits, including third party against either the Owner or Architect. professional liability insurance, requested by the 8.8 Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement,the Archi- Owner In excess of that normally carried by the teaand Architect's consultants shall have no responsibility Architect and he Architect's consultants; and for the discovery,presence,handling,removal or disposal of .9 Expense of computer-aided design and drafting or exposure of persons to hazardous materials in any form equipment time when used in connection with the at the Project site, including but not limited to asbestos, Project. asbestos products, polychlorinated biphenyl(PCB)or other toxic substances. 7.3 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT ©P THE ARCHITECT'S SERVICES ARTICLE 7 PAYMENTS TO THE ARCHITECT 711 Payments on account of the Architect's services and for Reimbursabie Expenses shall be made monthly upon preten- 7.1 DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE melon of the Architect's statement of services rendered or as otherwise provided in this Agreement. 7.1.1 Ditea Personnel Expense is defined as the direct salaries of the Architect's personnel engaged on the Project and the 7.3.2 Assam ia'- f`""s`nn t' —°a h.e.Ls.;;= rtion of the cost of their mandatory and customary con- MitliATAialopStrriielltsusdeenhisek.oreseenere. cibuaons and benefits related thereto,such as employment taxes and other statutory employee benefits, insurance.sick 7.4 ARCHITECT'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS leave,holidays,vacations,pensions,and similar contributors and benefits. 7.4.1 Records of Reimbursable Expenses and rix,encs per- 7.2 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES raining to services performed on the basis of a multiple of Direct Personnel Expense shall be available to the Owner or 7.2.1 Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to the Architect's the Owner's authorized representative at mutually convenient compensation and include expenses incurred by the Aschi- times. ARTIC1.E $ SIS OF COMPENSATION The Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: s.1 AN INITIAL PAYMENT OF N/A Dollars(s N/A )shall be made upon execution of this Agreement and credited to the Owner's recount at final payment. 8.2 COMPENSATION FOR THE ARCHITECT'S SERVICES, as described in :Snide :.Architect's Services, shall be computed as follows: (1n.-.ter barn of eoMPcrsrati,"Ineiudlrtq.0 puiaai:umr,+ru.l:iptes.irprrerr+tag s and 4.4-5:ffy rte servi,as xi%-,,k,bparrAza.iar r:c->v' s f a-rrrp recd on appii; of neces.gary) Refer to Exhibit 'A' , page IQ. • 4 5727-19$8 ALA DOCUMENT 8717•(77NER-ARCHITECT AGREE: NT• :95.5 EDITION•ALA" •,1,194A-•TH AMERICAN INSTtT(JT5"Of ARCHITECTS, :755 NEW YORK Ar E.'i;;5.N.W..WASHINGTON,ac.;cCos wARmso:teskena.d pN stows Ing,hatltN,LLS.c opyrl M bars eno is a-teat to 4gaipe s.�toei. MHi' 21 ' 90 14: 01 FROM ARCH ITEC TURAL ALL IAN • 8.3 FOR REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES,as described in Article 7,and any other items included in Article 9 as Reimbursable Ex- penses, a multiple of one ( 1.0 ) times the expenses incurred by the Architect, the Architect's employees and consultants Its the interest of the Project. • 11.4 Payments are due and payable thirty ( 30 )days from the date of the i rchitect's invoice.Amounts .unpaid sixty ( 60 ) days tiler the invoice date shall bear Interest at the tate entered below, or In the absence thereof, at the legal tate prevailing from time to time at the principal place of business of the Architect. (Insert rote of interest agreed tipon.) Newry laws end r eaulrements under the Federal'truth to Lendfng.sa,similar state anti local consumer credit taus and other regulations at the Owner i and Arcelteort principal placer of business,t&t fixation of the Aujecs and elsewhere may affect the t aJidi y of:bit provision.Specific legal advice should he otx.uta.l with ee pigs to deletions or n,odiJfralleft., and atm regerdtng carer tc utrente is.i as wrft:en din sures or waiters) 8.5 IF THE SCOPE of the Project or of the Architect's services is changed materially. the amounts of compensation shall be equitably adjusted. ARTICLE 9 OTHER CONDITIONS • This Agreement entered into as of the day and year first writa-n above. OWNER ARCHITECT (5igstaturs) (Signattario onald F. Pauley Carl J. Remick, Jr. tartest name and tuie) Cerk-Adm 7 n i s t ra to r `" (Amourd trams and jl:le) fr re s i ue n t AtA Dycumerr B727.OW'NEICARCH1TEC:AGREEMENT•:9sa EDt T ION•AA w+ • oat s•THE A.MEtt!C,in IrisTITL1'E OA ARCHITECTS.1735 NEW YORK AVtM.5,.'4w '1ftASHINGTOti,D.C.24005 S727-1988 5 WAiVlitiG:UnirKell d ptic.vc oprt.-fg violins*ILS.copyright Ism end is*tippet to ipsi pnawtoo , MAY 21 ' 30 14: 01 FROM APCHITECTURAL ALLIANC PAGE . 002 • • EXHIBIT B Work Program 1990 Space Needs Study City of Mounds View Mounds View,MN Prepared by: Donald Pauley Clerk-Administrator May 16,1990 A. Space Needs Assessment 1. Inventory of existing facilities a. Building 1110 b. Furnishings/Equipment c. Parking 2. Interviews of all current personnel and City Council members a. Police,including State Patrol Officer b. Finance c Administration d. Park Recreation,including Rick Wriskey,Jeannette Spiezka and selected instructors/groups using Community room and Commission. e. Public Works/Engineer f. Jerry Skelly,Jr.and Community Access Committee 3. Understanding of required adjacencies and relationships 4. Development of staffing prof 'tions/overvzew of position description; 5. Application of accepted space standards. B. Facility Options Analysis 1. Analysis of ideal short and long term de ,..ental reiaii;,nships in coo.u?tation with Department Heads. 2. Development and review of potential facility remodeling and addition options with staff, Departrnatt Heads,and City Council. MAY 21 ' 90 14: 00 FROM ARCHITECTURAL ALL I ANr PAGE . 00 1 . EXHIBIT B Page Two • May 16,1990 3, Basil Conceptual design options(with associated cost estimates)including building and furnishings/equipment. 4. Development of recommendations to facilitate City review and decision making process. C. Documentation 1. Preparation of documentation of analysis. 2. Presentation to staff and Department Heads with modification of draft document if necessary. 3. Presentation of final report to City Council with recommendation of alterative. • • • • v,( 4/•L g• MEMORANDUM Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members From :Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works Date :May 24, 1990 Subject :Bid Award for Test Well at Well #4 Site We opened bids on Wednesday, May 23, 1990 for this project. Below is the bid tabulation of the 4 bidders on this project. The low bidder was Mark J Traut Wells, Inc. with a bid of $11,675. This project was budgeted for $15,000. I recommend the bid for this project be awarded to Mark J Traut Wells, Inc. in the amount of their bid of $11,675, and that a ten percent contingency be established for a total project cost of $12,842. I further recommend that the City Engineer/Director of Public Works be authorized to sign all change orders up to the total amount of the contract. • TEST WELL #4 CITY PROJECT #90-5 BIDDER BID AMOUNT Mark J. Traut Wells, Inc. $11,675 Bergerson-Caswell $16,235 Keys Well Drilling $17,480 E. H. Renner & Sons $24,726 •