The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-02-1986 PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 410 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting April 2 , 1986 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds View Planning Commission was called to 1 . Call to order by Chairman Mountin at 7 : 31 PM on Order April 2 , 1986. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Forslund, Miller, 2. Roll Call Zollner and Chairman Mountin. It was noted Commissioner Anderson had an excused absence. ALSO PRESENT: Public Works/Community Development Director Thatcher and Councilmember Blanchard. Motion/Second: Forslund/Zollner to approve the 3. Approval of arch 5, 1986 minutes as presented. Minutes: March 5 , 1986 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried There were no residents requests or comments from 4. Residents the floor. Requests and Comments from the Floor Director Thatcher reviewed the request of the 5. Marcella Rybak, applicant to subdivide one lot into ten lots, and 8370 Groveland reviewed the proposed resolution supporting the Road, subdivision. Case 186-86 There were no questions or comments from the Rybak' s or their representatives. Motion/Second: Zollner/Miller to adopt Resolution No. 157-86 , recommending to the Council approval of the request of Marcella Rybak for a major subdivision at Groveland Road and Ardan Avenue, Planning Case No. 186-86. el ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1986 Regular Meeting Page Two 1110 rector Thatcher stated the item would be placed the April 7, 1986 City Council agenda. Motion/Second: Forslund to remove this item from 6. Rosewood the table. Corporation, Pinecrest Prop. Plat, Case 162-84 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Director Thatcher stated that Don Pauley, Attorney Meyers and Steve Thatcher have reviewed the proposal and they have discussed whether the road should be allowed to go in at this time, since it appears that further development may occur soon. He explained the Planning Commission has another month before they must make a decision. He added staff plans to meet with Rosewood Corporation and Nielson Realty and their attorneys to discuss the roads in the area, and he also noted that the property has changed hands and the new owners are rethinking the road alignment. Director Thatcher stated it is Staff ' s opinion that ervice to this area should be in conjunction with e overall plan for the entire area. Fred Catter, of Rosewood Corporation, explained they had entered into an agreement to purchase the property in July of 1984, and at that time, Raymond Avenue was planned . He stated they worked with Short-Elliot- Hendrickson to design the facility and took into consid- eration the road alignment. He added the City asked them to wait from October, 1984 to October, 1985, pending the possibiity of NCR coming in, which they did , and they would now like to move forward on their project. Mr. Catter stated they had filed litigation today in District Court to force the property owners to meet the agreements of the purchase agreement, and he would like to see a level of support from the City. Mr. Catter stated they would be willing to sit down with the new owner, who they understand is Nielsen Realty, and City Staff , and work things out. Peter Hilger, of Rosewood Corporation, stated he under- stands the land was platted for the road , and Short- Elliott-Hendrickson was authorized to design it, and he asked for no further delays. airman Mountin stated that several concepts have been roved for this property, but have fallen through. 4 Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1986 Regular Meeting Page Three 4I/1 . Catter stated they would like to proceed with their project for a mini-storage facility, and they are more than willing to work with the City and the new property owners. He added that he was also led to believe they would have a public road , and they want to move forward on that basis . Chairman Mountin stated she feels a commitment to Rosewood Corporation and pointed out that the Planning Commission has been conceptually in agreement with this development, on this site, and the developer should not hold off. Director Thatcher suggested the Planning Commission could make this approval contingent upon an agreement with the property owner on the location of the access road. Mr. Hilger stated that if the Planning Commission does go ahead and approve the resolution, they would like to meet with Nielsen Realty and the City before going before the City Council . He stated they would like to move forward at this time , and he also inquired whether 110 ey could be allowed to put a septic tank in until full rvices were available. Chairman Mountin responded that no septic tanks are allowed . The Planning Commission entered into a very lengthy discussion concerning the proposed resolution and the recommendation they would make to the Council . Numerous changes were made to the proposed resolution, and a resolution drafted for amending the Municipal Code by amending Chapter 40 , Zoning. Motion/Second: Miller/Forslund to adopt Resolution No . 155-86, recommending approval of amending Chapter 40, entitled , "Zoning" . 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Forslund/Zollner to adopt Resolution No . 159-86, recommending to the City Council approval of Mounds View Planning Case No. 162-84, Rosewood Corporation. 4 ayes 0 nayes Motion Carried 1111 Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1986 Regular Meeting Page Four was the concensus of the Planning Commission to 7. Action Items remove hazardous waste from the action item list until it is ready to be discussed. Chairman Mountin asked that the Comp Plan review be added to the list, and they agreed to work on it outside their regular meetings. Director Thatcher informed the Planning Commission 8. Staff Report he had been discussing Chapter 39 with Attorney Meyers, regarding billboards, and stated he would keep the Commission appraised of the progress. Director Thatcher informed the Commissioners that Mr. Herbst is coming in with a preliminary plat for his property, and they will be discussing it at the next agenda session. The attendees at the March 19, 1986, agenda session 9. Chairman' s were Commissioners Anderson, Forslund , Miller, Report Zollner, Chairman Mountin, Director Thatcher and Councilmember Blanchard . meeting was adjourned at 9: 15 p.m. Se 10. Adjournment Respectfully submitted , ---%14; 3-"6/ 1 Steven Thatcher Public Works/Community Development Director 1111 RESOLUTION NO. 155-86 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY 411 STATE OF MINNESOTA RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING MINI-STORAGE FACILITY WITH HOUSE/OFFICE FOR RESIDENT MANAGER WHEREAS , a mini-storage facility with house/office is not expressly permitted by Mounds View City Code; and WHEREAS , Rosewood Corporation has applied for a Code appeal; NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the following addition to City Code Chapter 40 . 20, Subd . D, as follows : ( 21 ) Mini-storage facilities with house/office for resident manager provided that : a. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the buildings and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. 411 b. Only one ( 1 ) house/office unit shall be permitted . c . The house/office shall have a minimum 960 square feet of residential living space . d . At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than ten ( 10 ) feet shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with Section 40.04, Subd . H of this Code . e . The entire lot area other than that occupied by the buildings or plantings shall be surfaced with material which will control dust, drainage and erosion which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. f. The entire lot area shall have a drainage system which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. g. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source is not visible from the public right-of-way or from an abutting residence and shall be in compliance with Section 40 . 04 , Subd . I of this Code . h. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. i . The provisions of Section 40 . 25, Subd . A( 5 ) of this code are considered and satisfactorily met. MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 155-86 PAGE TWO OF TWO BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 2nd day of April , 1986. ATTEST: Chairman • (SEAL) Director of Public Works/ Community Development 4 f MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 157-86 1111 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING PLANNING CASE NO. 186-86 , MARCELLA RYBAK (STANLEY FISHER ADDITION) , MAJOR SUBDIVISION (GROVELAND ROAD AND ARDAN AVENUE) WHEREAS, Marcella Rybak has requested City approval of a major subdivision; and WHEREAS, the request is to subdivide the property into 10 lots and to grant a wetland alteration permit to fill a portion of the wetland; and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat satisfies all City Code requirements including Chapters 40, 42, 49, 49A and State Statutes; and WHEREAS , the development will be reviewed and approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) prior to construction; and WHEREAS, Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District (RSWCD) located the wetland on the subdivision in the summer of 1985; and WHEREAS , the wetland located by RSWCD is smaller than the wetland zoning district map in the City Code; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 48. 02 allows the wetland zoning district map to be amended by four-fifths affirmative vote of the City Council ; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 48.02, Subd . 5(c) states that all structures shall be set bdck at least 100 feet from the wetland; and WHEREAS , City Code Chapter 48 . 06 , Subd . 3 (a) states that filling may be allowed when necessary for the use of property but only when it will not have a substantially or significantly adverse effect upon the ecological and hydrological characteristics of the wetland; and WHEREAS, the existing wetland ' s size is 1 . 1 acres; and WHEREAS, the fill will be triangular in shape and its 1111 size will be a maximum of 0 . 04 acres with a maximum depth of 1/2 foot; and RESOLUTION NO. 157-86 • PAGE TWO OF TWO WHEREAS , a house cannot be constructed on Lot 9 without installing the fill; and WHEREAS , the fill will, not have a substantial or significant effect upon the ecology or hydrology of the wetland; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends ammending the wetland zoning district map per attachment #1 ; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends granting a wetland alteration permit to fill the wetland a maximum of 0. 04 acres in area to a maximum depth of 1/2 foot; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the request by Marcella Rybak to subdivide the land as presented in the drawings received by the City on March 12, 1986, contingent on the following : 4111 1 . Approval by Rice Creek Watershed Distrct. 2. The filling shall begin within 12 months from the date of issuance of the permit per City Code Chapter 48 . 06, Subd . D( 5 ) . 3 . The City' s receipt of the drainage easement or title for Outlot A free and clear of any encumbrances on title or taxes per City Code Chapter 48 . 08 , Subd . 2. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the . • • • I - u l _ S. Adopted this 2nd day of April , 1986 . ATTEST: Chairperson (SEAL) Director of Public Works/ 410 Community Development • -, .... .1.. AI •eat I•6: • -.... . 4._ 'Q r '• " `' 080 II, 6 ' 2/0 412 00-4/2 N ' ' j,•, ,-, a 54' 2 4.4-‘, ;(11. 14 .•") k."9 iv . JCL& 141.4 .11.t 4 3 t,,,„ 3C I PI031 ' 4- •a 3 114,0 ...VD' 10I,?. /to-•s1,3 /70-4,3 :It a V I.) 10 1 CS i 1 ,-„, ,( 0-os A9 .1.,'7 rf)C RI' .IJ I,,a.f v9 i ' #+.4-Id 7. '•--4""-----r;-Tc 07,- • <11. A n..f• • A I Pea.Al/ ?CV) 92 7 r.1 1 c.,4• 2 . •S..` ••,. In /70•05 ;-- kr 0 1._ --._ ,c.,;.,5 I . . 43/Z 1"-------7-17?. ”( Al L'''. ' I _-----ili-•--------4—'-''--6rj--,-(7m.,o2_ iit 'e. ; c-N •P1/4°° l'A 6 3 /80-05 (•,,,.. P 1 e ." r. $ II 10111 55,13., ) ,.. . k( t 0;1 7 c .., . ,./I.L '• 3 CO ' 11) 1133/• ' • TT I ,...-..--..—aal V 6 1r4 /90-y. .944 200 q 3 h':$1 N.) 6 i. 4 0 0,„;./0 G. * 0.5 ) 110.1° % i , r 5 , 1 7 4.11 7-:I 1 . /70-35 •:•:•: :::::: ::•". see 1 or. P • *-4- . "..4.03,... .4;0‘' i.;ICI* 0 tO*4.15 t0 i 4 ..:::;i:i:iti:::::::::::-:•''',,eillgOv-ib. 4111 6 , .AA. .... -- iC44 v to.e -lif ‘ 7 RI 7 ii , v • r. v., ,-. 4 . .if: ::.:: :5if/,7, ...e * " 7 -. 7 1. S2C ,.. , J •d • . •,.. . i \\I taCk ...........::.s.6111$4.4...44 . 44• tit7 " t.- 4gi 1 4 . ..• . "'- .11 0 .4.- in .._............____;: `;'•"... 0 ' • . ., ‘.... nu 6 014°' 7;4§6 : 4 5 ''•.•.' i. _ ,. .-f. ..• . L , • ......__-_....—. 0 0'..1.5-. ..n ,'t...* .....iii:::::::.. 1817- , f 1 4065) ., - , :::••.....7,0,, •. .. 08 o-4,6 . • ' - 4 • ,e . ...I AI i....1Agin il 4 t10 f> vt.Pitciwi' -,‘ Gyovland .4:,.., 4 -- ..,;,... . St/,nroFet 19)?...5. 64, .,... . - 4 I 3 •t x:\(-) .,-- . .... -,•• , 0 - . . . F,Da r k , .. '' 6 5 .1. ,,, 41,,,. • 274 5 2759 2 74.11 L2 7 Ar4.,,: V ILO .r...A. An i:-.......1.14... .. ..... . ...._.... it'196lV $ , .zoo 3,,,, op I- ! 1CM I TOG ri 1 r GAIIRDNEIR 2NI-P AP P• ,,t, skei 1.)+J 4 1 30144 -2 I 30 - Lk! it l -ALAI 4, SC Ar..,,AQ°4 ci, i s • 2 a• ,,,, Ir. 4 :e s 4 yr 5--4 AL-E- A f).-{)IT-I 0 IN1 v• , 6 (1:y•-•5 4 c .N ,..----- ; 9 • - .,-.. WI.T /,St . SI _ 6 5 65 • 464,4" .4 5 111.A (Nei AO'lovos.swi.-' IA , e \A Or 04 4,Nr)" .ON6-4.irt i.' "iii S11.1 ID di .! . 4 /4‘ 41 _,..._—.....___ _1%13. — - , ,.- ,... . 5 4 3 I ? No 1 canc. 1 -...."N 3 ki „. 6s (.99 6' 1 z!...:65 _z?f t .i[ ij. ,.... .. sr* Ce -..E....54..-......1 * ^--..--"Itr171 - -111•• No'rinr—s, .7 . ,'SA PNN 4,1,. 3 64.$ It L4 6 t eii0.1 4.5-.i':'I '1 ` f• - , too ,2 r. WICA .***Kir,5 qpIXIT --T1ZV n) t ">, i .•-.-. 11.-,t,. LAC. . ILA 3 I ..11‘al,5_.-- 274.q 275ic 274/1- c, 0__ _---_- -S.-- /4- l . _--..c - ,(--.(tp t 5 '4P -< 2 ”' 4 C.2 ' ;, I ....... .-.— .._ r'S 5,0 L.... s'3.., )N...3.,f . ...;1..1 i I i VIO 2 9 i 2 .4 ZS :1 r2AI l Ks 4.ihztit LS LA JaD it4pc) _ _Li.....:,..4_ • u <4.‘,4sai 4, 4if. ti). I _Ikt,A _ '2'.A ts5• tv ..,., ilir KV.. , !I ,:. rc,,,,e. ,,,, ,,,,„,r _.... 1 41 --c..,. ;.,„--. . • - _ , z isig--.1 , 7 -7-1,5 -- -. .- ', -- '.5)-T---41f-r-- T ein Li"04" ;.,.• • i I *...' • •a.1, .,' 4-c.. . 4 o, .,.. 04 ' r•'58•,.c.. I in • 'G. i .f‘,4 .. 0...,•lf I I •44.... I 'VS WC 0 Li... . . I if V•V.,• 14C. iii *14:i . Li .-.' • f_t/ • ---- I/O- 1•,-,. " 1' g, ?'. 1-v-? -1 loo-4.5 15 V2.04-5-4 , ')5'.; .2* 1 s- 1 ((rar--e);) -L. 7, t 1(...;' '''''‘ L7c? (,. 77:.) 9 0.9 - 1 iv 4:trx' - . , '1 4' .'" 6'4' '117.ri) '4,if, ,-.-- I.: ,-.. ,, .4 jiCi,Z41,Z5 ' IS 1 7 t.8‘4 q 2400 tZV 2-/?5, 447 4119 %? 1'e.,•05...,, I..ki:,....I...q.'./ I ... ... :..4.4 ----1 , e al, ,..._ -1...,--T 0( I,0 G I ........., r..,_ . 4 .:IV- ..3 ---i-e-4- — -- RESOLUTION NO. 159-86 411) CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA • RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. 162-84, ROSEWOOD CORPORATION WHEREAS , Rosewood Corporation has requested City approval to construct a mini storage facility on a lot in Pinecrest Properties approximately one block north of the intersection of Highway 10 and unconstructed Raymond Avenue; and WHEREAS, construction of this facility, as requested , requires approval of the development and major subdivision; and WHEREAS , the Planning Commission has reviewed the staff report and reviewed information submitted by the applicant which includes the following : 1 . Development Plan 2 . Site Survey • 3 . Evidence of Site Control; and III WHEREAS , the Planning Commission has also reviewed this proposal and it is in conformance with all chapters of the Municipal Code , specifically Chapters 40, 42, 49, and 49A and State Statutes; and WHEREAS , this development must be reviewed and approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) prior to construction; WHEREAS, presently, City Code does not expressly permit on site residency managers for mini-storage facilities; and WHEREAS , the construction of the berm along County Road H-2 and the fire access from County Road H-2 had been agreed upon prior to rezoning the property (Ordinance No. 368 ) ; and WHEREAS, the location of the right-of-way of Raymond Avenue has not yet been resolved . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the request by Rosewood Corporation contingent on approval from Rice Creek Watershed District, construction of the berm along County Road H-2, and construction of utilities and street to the site and resolution of the right-of-way of Raymond Avenue; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends that a development agreement be entered III into between the City and the developer which includes the following : MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 159-86 III PAGE TWO OF THREE 1 . Exhibits : a) Site, Grading and Utility Plan b) Development Plan c ) Site Survey • d) Legal Description e) Ordinances No. 49A 7-Year Performance Bond of $1, 000 f ) Building Plans and Specifications g) Landscaping Plan h) Agreement executed between Rosewood Corporation and adjacent property owner for the location of Raymond Avenue 2. Security for the development in an amount to be determined. 3 . Exhibit 2A to require the following : a) Paved parking area to use B-6-18 curbing . b) Construction of emergency entrance/exit. • c ) Rosewood Corporation agrees to allow the developer of the lot north of Rosewood ' s lot to increase the size of Rosewood ' s storm water detention pond on the north property if it is the cost effective solution for storm water management. d ) Rosewood Corporation and Pinecrest properties or assigns shall pay for the public improve- ments. e ) Pinecrest Properties or assigns shall con- struct the berm along County Road H-2 prior to constructing the proposed mini-storage facility. f) Payment of all City expenses above and beyond amounts previously submitted . g) Other items as may be required by the City • Council . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning . Commission recommends a conditional use permit be granted which includes the above items and the following items : 1 . The office residence building shall be used as an office residence for this mini storage facility only. ID 2. The office residence shall not be considered a non-conforming structure as proposed by Resolu- tion No. 155-86. MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 159-86 • PAGE THREE OF THREE BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 2nd day of April , 1986 . ATTEST: Chairman (SEAL) Director of Public Works/ Community Development • III