HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-20-1989 • PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Special Meeting
September 20, 1989
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
The Mounds View Planning Commission was called 1 . Call to Order
to order by Chairman Mountin at 9: 37 p.m. on
Wednesday, September 20, 1989.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Dian, Jones, 2. Roll Call
Burgers, Miller. and Chairman Mountin.
It was noted Commissioners Alman and Zollner
had excused absences .
ALSO PRESENT: Councilmember Wuori and Planner
Hren.
There were no residents requests or comments 3. Residents Requests
• from the floor. . and Comments From
the Floor
City Planner Hren explained the requests which 4. Pioneer Schwinn,
involves a waiver of the Highway 10 moritorium 2661 Co. Rd. I .
district and a wetland alteration permit to Planning Case
construct in the wetland buffer. zone. The No. 278-89
Planning Commission discussed the grades of
the property and the first floor elevations
of the building which is proposed at 911 feet .
After some discussion, the Planning Commission
felt comfortable with the request provided that
additional berming was added on the County
Road I side of the property and that more
plantings be added on the north side of the
building. It was also discussed that a lighting
plan, security plan, drainage plan and a sign
plan be submitted for review. There was also
discussion on the hours of operation for the
site which varied from April to September. and
September to March.
Mr . Wolens indicated there would be no repairs
done at the site and they already have bike
maintenance and repair. shops at their other.
•
locations . It was also noted that because the
Mounds View Planning Commission September 20, 1989
Special Meeting Page Two
"kite would provide for two uses, the parking
on the site must be adequate to accommodate both
tenants of the building. Mr . Harold Swenson,
the contractor , indicated that they reviewed
the Staff Report and recommendations and
have since revised the drawings to meet the
requirements of the City Engineer .
Motion/Second: Dian/Burgers to approve
Resolution No. 266-89 recommending approval
of the requested modification to the moratorium
district and wetland alteration permit to allow
construction of a free-standing building at
2661 County Road I .
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Planner Hren explained the request which 5. Paster Enterprises
involves a rezoning of the convenience food MV Square/Hardees
restaurant portion of the property from B-4 Planning Case
to B-3, a conditional use permit for. the 276-89
convenience food restaurant with drive-through
facilities and a conditional use permit/planned
unit development to allow more than one
•rincipal building on the site.
Mr . Benshoof of Benshoof & Associates explained
the traffic and parking study done for the
proposed Hardees restaurant at the Mounds View
Square site.
The Planning Commission discussed the land-
scaping on the site and Mr . Jim Everson of
Paster Enterprises explained that they could
add small bushes to the site. Of particular
concern was the blockage of the headlights
along County Road I near the drive-through
portion of the site. The issue was raised
that because of the lack of available space,
a fence may be more appropriate. City
Council liason Wuori explained that the City
does not encourage the use of a fence because
it collects trash and the City prefers the
natural green area provided on the site. Mr .
Everson explained that they would be adding
vines to the drainage pond fence that is
currently in place.
Mr . Rod Karass, legal council for Hardees,
Aftresented zoning issues and how this proposal
elates to the Comprehensive Plan.
Mounds View Planning Commission September. 20, 1989
Special Meeting Page Three
410h
ere was discussion on the pond e and that
currently exists and potentially allowing for a
natural outlet with a baffled weir . Currently
Rice Creek pumps the water from the pond into
the ditch. There was discussion on snow storage
on the site and if the winter was severe, the
snow would have to be trucked out .
The Planning Commission indicated that it was
the intent to have business in this area of the
City and not have this type of development go
west . It was expressed that this provides a
balance and keeps this type of development on
one end of the City. It also balances the Mounds
View Square center . The Planning Commission felt
that the proposal is in conformance with the
Comprehensive Plan and the City would have control
of the site because of the CUP/PUD to improve the
site that needs upgrading. The Planning Commis-
sion felt that the landscaping plan needs some
revisions, particularly on the north side of the
property.
The Planning Commission wanted a lighting plan,
Illrevised landscaping plan and a sign plan
bmitted for their review at their next meeting
when they would consider the development stage
plans of the CUP/PUD.
Motion/Second: Jones/Burgers to approve
Resolution No. 265-89 recommending approval
of the rezoning of the Hardees portion
of the property from B-4 to B-3, the
proposed conditional use permit for the
Hardees convenience food restaurant with
drive-through facilities, and conditional use
permit/planned unit development to allow
more than one principal building on the
site.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Chairman Mountin adjourned the meeting at 4. Adjournment
10: 30 p.m.
Res ectfully subm` ted,
tip1
• M c elle Hren
City Planner
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 265-89
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF MOUNDS VIEW SQUARE
PROPOSED REZONING, CONCEPTUAL STAGE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A HARDEE 'S CONVENIENCE FOOD RESTAURANT,
PLANNING CASE NO. 276-89
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
requested rezoning from B-4 to B-3, conceptual stage
Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development and
Conditional Use Permit for the convenience food restaurant
to be located at the Mounds View Square Shopping Center site
(PIN 07-30-23-11-0001 ) .
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
proposed rezoning request as a separate issue from the site
development plans; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
criteria for all proposed rezonings ; and
• WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that
the proposed rezoning is in conformance with the
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that
the proposed rezoning will not have an adverse impact on the
surrounding properties; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
geographical area involved; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined the
=-- - -
area in which it is proposed; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has taken into
consideration the character of the surrounding area; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined
that the applicant has demonstrated a need for such use; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
requested conceptual stage Conditional Use Permit/Planned
Unit Development to allow for the addition of another
principal building on this site; and
•
RESOLUTION NO. 265-89
PAGE TWO
111
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has also reviewed
the Conditional Use Permit for the convenience food
restaurant with drive-through facilities and the proposed
development site plans associated with the new structure;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
parking and circulation for the entire Mounds View Square
Center site and has determined that the site plan provides
503 parking spaces when 537 parking spaces are required for
a shortage of 34 parking spaces; and
WHEREAS the Planning Commission has determined that
they approve of waiving of the installation of 34 additional
parking stalls as permitted with a CUP/PUD district ; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
traffic and parking study done by Benshoof and Associates;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
City Engineer ' s memo regarding the traffic and parking
study; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is in
agreement with the City Engineer ' s and Benshoof ' s traffic
and parking study; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
City Forester ' s recommendations dated September 15th and
agrees with the proposed recommendations ; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
proposed sign request which is in conformance with the City
sign code and determines that it is acceptable.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning
Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the
requested rezoning from B-4 to B-3, the conceptual
Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development and the
Conditional Use Permit for the convenience food restaurant
with drive-through facilities contingent upon:
1. The developer enter into and sign a development
agreement with the City.
2. There shall not be excessive noise as a result
of the drive through restaurant outdoor menu
board.
3. All requirements of the City Forester dated
September 15, 1989 are complied with.
RESOLUTION NO. 265-89
PAGE THREE
4. Requirements of the City Engineer outlined in
two memos both dated September 13, 1989 are
complied with.
5. After an operational period of one year, the
hours of operation will be subject to review.
6. A permit from the Minnesota Department of
Transportation is obtained for the land-
scaping shown on the state highway property.
7 . The site is maintained.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
directs staff to forward this recommendation to the City
Council prior to the approval of the minutes .
Adopted this 20th day of September , 1989.
ATTEST: � r �
Cha3 n
(SEAL)
/
• Ci/y Planner
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 266-89
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MODIFICATION TO THE
MORITORIUM DISTRICT AND WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT REQUEST BY
PIONEER SCHWINN, 2261 COUNTY ROAD I, PLANNING CASE NO. 278-89
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
requested modification of the moritorium district and the wetland
alteration permit to allow the construciton of a Pioneer Schwinn
dealership at 2661 County Road I (PIN #07-30-23-12-10 ) ; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed
development site plans including the building elevations and
determined that the proposal is in conformance with the Zoning
Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
requested modification to the moritorium district and has
determined that it does not meet the intent of the moritorium
district ; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the
• applicant has demonstrated a hardship on his property based on
the uniqueness of his property and unique character, that is, the
15 foot Highway 10 frontage; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
requested wetland alteration permit to allow for development in a
wetland buffer zone; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the
proposal will not affect the integrity of the Comprehensive Plan
or the City' s Zoning Ordinance or this Interim District ; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the
proposal is not consistent with the letter and intent of the
Moritorium Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the
proposal does not affect the health, safety and general welfare
of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning
Commission of the City of Mounds View recommends to the City
Council approval of the requested modification to the moritorium
district and a wetland alteration permit and development site
plan for the proposed Pioneer. Schwinn Dealership at 2261 County
0 Road I, contingent upon the following:
1 . All requirements of the City Engineer as outlined in
two memos, both dated September 13, 1989, are complied
with.
RESOLUTION NO. 266-89
PAGE TWO
III
2. The proposed changes recommended by the City Forester ,
as outlined in a memo dated September. 15, 1989, are
complied with.
3. The addition of berming along Mounds View Drive,
submission of a lighting plan and submission of a sign
plan.
4. The developer enter into and sign a development
agreement with the City.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council
prior to approval of the minutes .
Adopted this 20th day of September, 1989.
ATTEST:
,W2
4,ry I
fyi,.. .___-
Cha
(SEAL)
1111
aki/4„, Am.-,
City Planner.