HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-01-1995 PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
411 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
November 1, 1995
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
The Mounds View Planning Commission was 1. Call To Order
called to order by Chair Peterson at
7:00 p.m. on November 1, 1995
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners 2. Roll Call
Stevenson, Miller, Ruggles, Nelson,
Colleen, and Chair Peterson.
Commissioner Johnston had an excused
absence.
ALSO PRESENT: Planner Harrington,
Councilmember Trude and Recording
Secretary Benesch were also present.
Councilmember Trude noted a change that 3. Approval of
was needed on the second page under Minutes:
• Report of Chair, second paragraph to October 4, 1995
read " . . . .announced that she had been
contacted by residents who wished to
discuss amending of the nuisance
ordinance. The Chair noted a full
agenda was planned for the next work
session" .
Motion/Second: Nelson/Colleen to
approve the minutes of October 4, 1995,
as amended.
6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
There were no resident requests or 4. Resident
comments from the floor. Requests and
Comments
The applicant, Robert Yentsch, was 5. Consideration
present. of Resolution
Nos. 427-95,
Planner Harrington briefly reviewed this 428-95, and
item noting that the applicant proposes 429-95
• to construct driveways at 5308/5312, Regarding
5324/5326 and 5364/5366 Raymond Avenue Variance
Requests by
Mounds View Planning Commission November 1, 1995
•egular Meeting Page 2
and is requesting less than the five Robert Yentsch,
foot setback allowed by Code. 5308/5312,
5324/5326 and
Planner Harrington reminded the 5364/5366
Commission that this item was discussed Raymond Avenue,
at their October 18th agenda meeting and Planning Case
it was concluded that no other Nos. 424-95,
reasonable alternative exists and the 425-95 and 426-
Commission directed Staff to prepare 95.
three resolutions for approval to
include a couple of contingencies. The
first being that the applicant is to
provide a Certificate of Survey for the
properties prior to construction of the
driveway. It was noted that the
applicant was in possession of two
surveys and will be obtaining the third.
Planner Harrington informed the
applicant that building permits could
not be issued until the surveys were
provided. In addition, the resolution
would include that in the event of
• necessary City work, costs for repair of
that portion of the driveway surface
located within the City-maintained
easement shall be the responsibility of
the property owner.
Motion/Second: Nelson/Stevenson to
approve Resolution No. 427-95 regarding
the variance request of Robert Yentsch,
5308/5312 Raymond Avenue.
It was noted by the applicant that,
after review of the surveys, it was
found that one of the driveways will
need to be altered one foot and that one
of the buildings is skewed on the
property, so the proposed driveway will
be adjusted accordingly.
6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Notion/Second: Ruggles/Miller to
approve Resolution No. 428-95 regarding
the variance request of Robert Yentsch,
5324/5326 Raymond Avenue.
• 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View Planning Commission November 1, 1995
Otegular Meeting Page 3
Motion/Second: Miller/Peterson to
approve Resolution No. 429-95 regarding
the variance request of Robert Yentsch,
5364/5366 Raymond Avenue.
6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Planner Harrington informed the
applicant that this was the final action
for this case and the next step would be
the permit process when the additional
survey is obtained.
The applicant, Larry Beach, was present. 6. Consideration
of Resolution
Planner Harrington reviewed this item No. 430-95 and
reminding the Commission that Mr. Beach 431-95
has made similar proposals in the past. Regarding
He noted that Mr. Beach is requesting to Rezoning and
rezone Lots 10 and 11, Spring Lake Park Zero Lot Line
Knolls, from R-1 to R-2 and that this Subdivision
• item meets the criteria required in the Requests by
Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan. Larry Beach,
Planner Harrington reminded the Planning Case
Commission that, per their direction at No. 428-95
the October 18th meeting, he had
prepared Resolution Nos. 430-95 and 431-
95. He advised the Commission that this
item will require two actions, the first
being the rezoning and then the zero lot
line subdivision.
Motion/Second: Nelson/Miller to approve
Resolution No. 430-95 regarding the
rezoning request by Larry Beach for the
property located at 2801 and 2809
Bronson Drive from R-1 to R-2 .
It was explained that the rezoning will
require a public hearing and that the
ordinance will require two readings with
the publication taking 30 days.
6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Planner Harrington continued the
• discussion moving to the next request
for a zero lot line subdivision. He
explained that for side-by-side
Mounds View Planning Commission November 1, 1995
4Wegular Meeting Page 4
dwellings, the code allows for zero lot
line subdivisions and assured the
Commission that the proposed lots meet
the minimum lot width of 50 feet.
Planner Harrington concluded stating
that, again, this item was very similar
to previous cases approved for Mr.
Beach.
Motion/Second: Nelson/Colleen to
approve Resolution No. 431-95 regarding
the zero lot line subdivision request by
Larry Beach for 2801 and 2809 Bronson
Drive.
Commissioner Stevenson suggested that
the Commission should include wording in
the resolution as to why the building is
not centered on the lot. It was pointed
out that the building would be
constructed this way to save trees
located on the property. Planner
411 Harrington explained that the building
can be located anywhere on the lot as
long as it is within setback
requirements.
Additional discussion developed
regarding the lot north of Mr. Beach's
last townhome. Mr. Beach reported that
he was informed that this lot would need
Rice Creek Watershed District approval
in order to develop it. Mr. Beach also
expressed concern about what would be
built on the lot because he did not want
his townhome property values to
depreciate. He emphasized he wanted to
make sure permits were obtained for any
construction that may take place.
Mr. Beach raised another concern
regarding the lighting along Silver Lake
Road in the area of his townhomes. Mr.
Beach was advised to contact Dawn
Postundensek at City Hall for
information regarding a street light
petition.
• Motion Carried
6 ayes 0 nays
Mounds View Planning Commission November 1, 1995
•egular Meeting Page 5
Planner Harrington informed Mr. Beach
that this item would be discussed at the
November 13th Council meeting and that
the public hearing for the rezoning
would be held on November 27th.
Following discussion of this item, Mr.
Beach expressed to the Commission that
he is looking for additional lots to
build on. Mr. Beach was advised to
contact Jennifer Bergman at City Hall to
set up a meeting to talk about lots that
are available in Mounds View.
The applicant, North Star Land 7. Consideration
Services/U.S. West was not present. of Resolution
No. 432-95
Planner Harrington summarized the Regarding
request by North Star Land Services/U.S. Conditional Use
West regarding the construction of a Permit Request
public utility structure at 2280 Highway by North Star
• 10. He reminded the Commission that Land Services/
last spring approval was given by the U.S. West, 2280
Planning Commission to locate a similar Highway 10,
building of this type to service Mounds Planning Case
View Business Park North and that this No. 427-95
proposed building would service Mounds
View Business Park South. Planner
Harrington noted that this item was
discussed at the October 18th meeting
and that he has prepared Resolution No.
432-95. He listed the conditions
included in the resolution: the
applicant shall provide the City with an
easement agreement, signed by the
property owner, for the parcel upon
which the structure will be located and
that landscaping around the structure
shall be provided as directed by the
City Forester. It was noted that it
would be the owner's responsibility for
the landscaping.
Motion/Second: Nelson/Stevenson to
approve Resolution No. 432-95 Regarding
the conditional use permit request of
• North Star Land Services/U. S. West,
2280 Highway 10.
Mounds View Planning Commission November 1, 1995
•egular Meeting Page 6
6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
The applicant, Brian Daniels, was not 8. Consideration
present but he had contacted Mr. of Resolution
Harrington and expressed that he was not No. 433-95
able to be present but wanted his item Regarding
to move forward. Conditional Use
Permit Request
Planner Harrington explained that the by Brian
applicant has constructed an addition to Daniels, 7280
his existing garage without a permit so Silver Lake
he was not aware of the size limitation. Road, Planning
Mr. Daniel's existing garage was 864 Case No. 430-95
square feet and he constructed an
addition of 384 square feet for a total
of 1,248 square feet. Code requires
that anything exceeding 864 square feet
requires conditional use permit approval
with the maximum allowed by Code at
1,264 square feet. Planner Harrington
also pointed out that if a structure
• exceeds 1, 000 square feet, no other
accessory buildings are allowed on the
property. Planner Harrington continued
by explaining that Mr. Daniels currently
has a shed that would need to be removed
and that, as discussed at the October
18th meeting, a cash escrow would be
required to assure removal of the shed.
Planner Harrington reviewed the
conditions included in the resolution
stating that the conditional use permit
shall be recorded with Ramsey County,
the building shall be designed and
maintained to provide a uniform
appearance with the dwelling unit, and
the existing 10 'x10' shed located
adjacent to the proposed structure shall
be removed from the property no later
than July 1, 1996 and that a $1, 000
deposit shall be made by the applicant
to ensure compliance with this
condition.
It was noted that the applicant, Mr.
Daniels, was informed that a deposit
• will be required.
Mounds View Planning Commission November 1, 1995
•egular Meeting Page 7
Motion/Second: Ruggles/Miller to
approve Resolution No. 433-95 regarding
the conditional use permit request of
Brian Daniels, 7280 Silver Lake Road.
A couple of concerns were raised by the
Planning Commission regarding compliance
with Item B of the resolution,
" . . .providing a uniform appearance with
the dwelling unit", about the current
condition of the garage being an
"eyesore", what repercussions would Mr.
Daniels face for constructing the
addition without a permit, and will
inspections still be required even
though the structure has been built.
Planner Harrington assured the
Commission that the City would follow up
on these items and pointed out that when
construction occurs without a building
permit, the fees are doubled and
111 reassured them that any inspections
required will still be conducted.
It was also asked that if the applicant
is in violation of the Home Occupation
ordinance, will he be subject to an
administrative offense and Mr.
Harrington stated that he would be.
One final question regarding this item
was raised by the Planning Commission as
to whether or not this property was
located within a wetland. Planner
Harrington informed the Commission that
this property was not located directly
within the wetland, and therefore, no
wetland permit is required. It was
noted, however, that the property was
within the 100 ' wetland buffer area.
6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Planner Harrington informed the 9. Staff Report
Commission that at the next agenda
410 session the Sign Ordinance will be
discussed. He also mentioned that every
business in the City was invited to a
Mounds View Planning Commission November 1, 1995
•egular Meeting Page 8
meeting to discuss the sign ordinance
and that 11 of the 155 businesses were
represented at the meeting.
Members present at the October 18, 1995, 10. Report of Chair
agenda session included Commissioners
Johnston, Nelson, Colleen, Stevenson,
Ruggles and Chair Peterson.
Commissioner Miller had an excused
absence.
There being no further business before 11. Adjournment
the Commission, Chair Peterson adjourned
the meeting at 7:50 p.m.
Respectfu Submitted,
•aul Harrington
Community Development Coordinator
•
• MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 427-95
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING A DRIVEWAY SETBACK VARIANCE FOR ROBERT
YENTSCH, 5308/5312 RAYMOND AVENUE, PLANNING CASE NO. 424-95
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has
reviewed the request of Robert Yentsch for a variance to allow a
driveway at a setback less than that allowed by Municipal Code;
and
WHEREAS, the applicants property is subject to the
requirements setforth in Title 1100 of the Mounds View Municipal
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
criteria used to evaluate all variance requests; and
WHEREAS, the special conditions of the property do not
result from the actions of the applicant; and
WHEREAS, granting the variance would not confer special 1
privileges on the applicant that are not enjoyed by other
0 property owners in the same district; and
WHEREAS, the variance requested is the minimum
necessary to alleviate the hardship.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
Planning Commission approves the request of Robert Yentsch for a
variance allowing a side yard driveway setback less than that
allowed by Municipal Code contingent upon the following:
1) The applicant shall provide a Certificate of Survey
for the property prior to construction of the
driveway.
2) In the event of necessary City work, costs for
repair of that portion of the driveway surface
located within the City-maintained easement shall
be the sole responsibility of the property owner.
Adopted this 1st day of November, 1995.
ATTEST:
Chairman i / ,.
(SEAL)
Co unity Developmt Coordinator
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 428-95
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING A DRIVEWAY SETBACK VARIANCE FOR ROBERT
YENTSCH, 5324/5326 RAYMOND AVENUE, PLANNING CASE NO. 425-95
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has
reviewed the request of Robert Yentsch for a variance to allow a
driveway at a setback less than that allowed by Municipal Code;
and
WHEREAS, the applicants property is subject to the
requirements setforth in Title 1100 of the Mounds View Municipal
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
criteria used to evaluate all variance requests; and
WHEREAS, the special conditions of the property do not
result from the actions of the applicant; and
WHEREAS, granting the variance would not confer special
privileges on the applicant that are not enjoyed by other
• property owners in the same district; and
WHEREAS, the variance requested is the minimum
necessary to alleviate the hardship.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
Planning Commission approves the request of Robert Yentsch for a
variance allowing a side yard driveway setback less than that
allowed by Municipal Code contingent upon the following:
1) The applicant shall provide a Certificate of Survey
for the property prior to construction of the
driveway.
2) In the event of necessary City work, costs for
repair of that portion of the driveway surface
located within the City-maintained easement shall
be the sole responsibility of the property owner.
Adopted this 1st day of November, 1995.
ATTEST: p
41,1
Chairman ' 111111,
(SEAL)
Community DeveZment Coordinator
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 429-95
• CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING A DRIVEWAY SETBACK VARIANCE FOR ROBERT
YENTSCH, 5364/5366 RAYMOND AVENUE, PLANNING CASE NO. 426-95
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has
reviewed the request of Robert Yentsch for a variance to allow a
driveway at a setback less than that allowed by Municipal Code;
and
requirementsEsetthe
forthinpTitlen1100ts rofethe Mounds�ViewtMunici al
Code; and p
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
criteria used to evaluate all variance requests; and
WHEREAS, the special conditions of the property do not
result from the actions of the applicant; and .
WHEREAS, granting the variance would not confer special
privileges on the applicant that are not enjoyed by other
• property owners in the same district; and
WHEREAS, the variance requested is the minimum
necessary to alleviate the hardship.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
Planning Commission approves the request of Robert Yentsch for a
variance allowing a side yard driveway setback less than that
allowed by Municipal Code contingent upon the following:
1) The applicant shall provide a Certificate of Survey
for the •ro•ert
driveway.
2) In the event of necessary City work, costs for
repair of that portion of the driveway surface
located within the City-maintained easement shall
be the sole responsibility of the property owner.
Adopted this 1st day of November, 1995.
ATTEST:
(SEAL) Chairman
C6mmunity Developmi Coordinator
1110 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 381-94
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR AN OVERSIZED
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AT 7604 SPRING LAKE ROAD
PLANNING CASE NO. 374-94
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Michael
Hegland for a variance to allow an accessory structure in excess of the square footage allowed
for with the issuance of a Conditional Use permit; and
WHEREAS, the applicant's property is subject to requirements set forth in Title 1100 of the
Mounds View Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the criteria used to evaluate all
variance requests; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has presented a hardship statement to the Planning
Commission; and
• WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of the provisions of this code would not deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of
this Code; and
WHEREAS, the special conditions of the property result from the actions of the applicant;
and
WHEREAS, granting the variance would confer special privileges on the applicant that
are not enjoyed by other property owners in the same district; and
WHEREAS, the variance requested is not the minimum necessary to alleviate the
hardship.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission
denies the request of Michael Hegland for a 484 square foot accessory building at 7604 Spring
Lake Road.
Adopted this 4th day of May, 1994.
ATTEST:
Chairman J '
(SEAL)
• Community DevelopmerWCoordinator
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 430-95
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REZONING REQUEST OF
LARRY BEACH, PLANNING CASE NO. 428-95
WHEREAS, Larry Beach has made application to rezone a
portion of the property located at 2801 and 2809 Bronson Drive from R-
1, Single Family Residential to R-2, Single and Two Family
Residential; and
WHEREAS, the property is legally known as:
The North 225 feet of Lots 10 and 11, Spring Lake Park Knolls,
Ramsey County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 1125.01, Subdivision 1(e) of the Mounds
View Municipal Code provides that the Planning Commission shall
consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. It
further states that judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to,
the following factors:
1. Relationship to Municipal Comprehensive Plan
2 . The geographical area involved
• 3 . Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate
the area in which it is proposed
4 . The character of the surrounding area
5. The demonstrated need for such use; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed
the request in relation to the aforementioned criteria; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning request is consistent with the City's
proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation for this property
which is residential development; and
WHEREAS, approval of the request will provide for d zoning
designation which is consistent with the proposed land use.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission recommends approval of the request to rezone the property
legally known as:
The North 225 feet of Lots 10 and 11, Spring Lake Park Knolls,
Ramsey County, Minnesota
from R-1, Single Family Residential to R-2 , Single and Two Family
Residential.
Resolution No. 430-95
Page two
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs
Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval
of the minutes.
Adopted this 1st day of November, 1995.
ATTEST: {� t-
Chairman 3
(SEAL)
V . � ✓ /
Community Devel,opment Coordinator
•
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
• RESOLUTION NO. 431-95
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZERO LOT LINE
MINOR SUBDIVISION, LARRY BEACH, 2801 AND 2809 BRONSON DRIVE,
PLANNING CASE NO. 428-95
WHEREAS, Larry Beach has requested approval of a zero
lot line minor subdivision of the property located at 2801 and
2809 Bronson Drive; and
WHEREAS, the property is legally known as:
The North 225 feet of Lots 10 and 11, Spring Lake Park
Knolls, Ramsey County, MN; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has
reviewed the applicant's request for a zero lot line subdivision
and determined that it is in conformance with Chapters 1100 and
1200 of the Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of
• the requested zero lot line minor subdivision request by Larry
Beach contingent upon the following:
1) Providing the City with appropriate title abstracts and
recording those abstracts with Ramsey County.
2) Inclusion of the following restrictions in the deeds of
the two parcels:
a. If one dwelling unit is burned or destroyed, it
shall be reconstructed in a uniform appearance.
b. If both dwelling units are burned or destroyed,
minimum lot widths shall then prevail as for single
family homes.
c. A double dwelling unit may .be rebuilt meeting the
original conditions of this Code.
d. A uniform exterior appearance, in terms of color,
design and maintenance, shall be maintained.
3) The subdivision is subject to Park Land Dedication
requirements and must be satisfactorily complied with.
Resolution No. 431-95
• Page Two
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council
prior to approval of the minutes.
Adopted this 1st day of November, 1995
ATTEST: C)gr$• -•
Chairm
(SEAL)
Community Develop Coordinator
•
•
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
411 RESOLUTION NO. 432-95
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A PUBLIC UTILITY STRUCTURE, US WEST COMMUNICATIONS,
2280 HIGHWAY 10, PLANNING CASE NO. 427-95
WHEREAS, US West Communications has made application
for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction of
a public utility structure at 2280 Highway 10; and
WHEREAS, Title 1100 of the Mounds View Municipal
Code requires the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit for the
construction of public utility buildings within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has
reviewed the applicants request against the criteria outlined
in Title 1100; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that
the requested Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the
Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
Planning Commission recommends approval of the requested
Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a public utili-
ty structure at 2280 Highway 10 contingent upon the following:
1. The applicant shall provide the City with an ease-
ment agreement, signed by the property owner, for the parcel
upon which the structure will be located.
2 . Landscaping around the structure shall be provided
as directed by the City Forester.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
directs Staff to forward a copy of this Resolution to the City
Council prior to approval of the minutes.
Adopted this 1st day of November, 1995
ATTEST:
LIA-. D. .R-:t 7-.,-_
Chairm n
(SEAL)
411 Community Developient Coordinator
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 433-95
411
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN OVERSIZED GARAGE FOR BRIAN DANIELS,
7280 SILVER LAKE ROAD, PLANNING CASE NO. 430-95
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has
reviewed the request of Brian Daniels for an oversized garage;
and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Zoning Ordinance allows, by
conditional use permit, up to 1,264 square feet of garage square
footage on one lot; and
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a 1248 square foot
detached garage; and
WHEREAS, the proposed building meets all applicable
setback requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of
the requested conditional use permit for an oversized garage by
Brian Daniels, 7280 Silver Lake Road, contingent upon the
following:
a) The conditional use permit be recorded with Ramsey Co.
b) The building be designed and maintained to provide a
uniform appearance with the dwelling unit.
c) The existing 10'x 10' shed located adjacent to the
proposed structure shall be removed from the property
no later than July 1, 1996. A $1, 000 deposit shall be
made by the applicant to ensure compliance with this
condition.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council
prior to approval of the minutes.
Adopted this 1st day of November, 1995
ATTEST:
D Pzt7-
Chairman
(SEAL)
411 Community Development Coordinator