Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-07-1996 PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting August 7, 1996 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds View Planning Commission was 1. Call to Order called to order by Chair Peterson at 7:03 p.m. on August 7, 1996. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Miller, 2. Roll Call Brooks, Johnston, Brasaemle and Chair Peterson. (Commissioners Stevenson and Obert had excused absences.) • ALSO PRESENT: Planning Associate Pruitt, Community Development Director Sheldon and Recording Secretary Benesch. Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Brooks to approve 3. Approval of Minutes: the minutes of July 10, 1996, as amended. July 10, 1996 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried There were no citizen requests or comments 4. Citizen Requests and from the floor. Comments From the Floor The Planning Commission took action on 6. Consideration of agenda item 6 before the informational meeting Resolution Nos. 468- for item 5. 96 and 469-96 Regarding a PUD Rob Davidson and Mike Grenander, Amendment for representatives of the applicant, Everest Everest Property Property Management, were present. Management, 5251 Program Avenue, 4 • Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 Regular Meeting Page 2 Planning Associate Pruitt explained that Planning Case No. Everest Property Management is requesting a 453-96 PUD amendment and development review to expand the parking lot at 5251 Program Avenue, Building G and reminded the Planning Commission that this item was discussed at their July 24, 1996, agenda meeting. She continued by explaining that the applicant is requesting to have a net increase of 35 parking stalls on the east side of the property and wishes to increase the number of stalls in order to meet the demands of a tenant that may locate to the business park which will bring the total number of parking stalls provided on the site to 500. She noted that the plans indicate the parking spaces located on the east side of the property will abut the property line and noted that at the last meeting the Planning Commission agreed to allow parking up to the property line for this PUD amendment since a landscaping buffer is being provided within the right-of-way. It was also noted that the parking area to the south of the building will be restriped. She also indicated that Rick Wriskey, City Forester, has requested the existing trees be moved within 8 to 9 feet from the curb along the right-of-way and also that the applicant has been advised that the amendment will require Rick Creek Watershed District approval. Planning Associate Pruitt'noted the contingencies contained in Resolution No. 468-96 which are: 1) a landscaping plan be submitted subject to approval of the City Forester and 2) approval be given from Rice Creek Watershed District. Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Miller to approve Resolution No. 468-96 as amended recommending approval of an amendment to • Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 Regular Meeting Page 3 Development Agreement No. 87-81 with Mounds View Business Park, Building G, 5251 Program Avenue. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Miller to approve Resolution No. 469-96 as amended recommending approval of the development request of Everest Development LTD, Mounds View Business Park, Building G, 5251 Program Avenue. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried The applicant was informed that this item would be forwarded to the City Council at their August • meeting for action. Bill Diem, of Stahl Construction, was present. 5. Public Informational Meeting Regarding Community Development Director Pamela the Request of Stahl Sheldon noted that this item was discussed at Construction for the the Planning Commission agenda meeting and Construction of the that Stahl Construction is requesting to build a New Apostolic Church church, the New Apostolic Church, on the at 3025 County Road property located at 3025 County Road H. H, Planning Case No. 452-96 Community Development Director Sheldon informed the Planning Commission that there was new information regarding parking and drainage for this request. She continued by explaining that the Building Inspector had calculated the total parking stalls required based on the total area of the building, not the seating capacity, and that Stahl Construction has asked that it be recalculated by the area that will be used for seating. Stahl's point was • that not all of the area will be used for seating and they anticipate their parking needs will not Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 Regular Meeting Page 4 be as great as portrayed in the City's analysis. She also explained that a retention area may not be required because they have an alternative proposal to use a clarification ditch and that our Engineering consultant is awaiting a proposal from Stahl Construction as to how they will modify the parking lot to make this proposal work. Director Sheldon recommended to the Planning Commission that this item be tabled at this point but noted that the applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission act on the variance so that the lay-out of the site can be arranged. The Planning Commission inquired about the curb cuts that are not in compliance. Planning Associate Pruitt informed the Commission that 411 the applicant desires to remedy this issue and come into compliance with City Code. Planning Associate Pruitt also noted items that need to be addressed: landscaping, fire suppression system, driveway access, exits on both sides of the building, revised floor plans showing one story not two, revised drainage plans for approval by the City Engineer and submittal of an application for a wetland alteration permit. The applicant, Bill Diem, explained that he is in favor of temporarily tabling this item due to the fact that the main office for the New Apostolic Church is located in Pennsylvania and that it may take some additional time to get all the items required. Lyle Bellis, 2977 County Road H, inquired whether or not the proposed building would be a multi-person residence. Mr. Diem responded that there would be no residence on site. Mr. Bellis also asked if a traffic study had been • done because he felt this proposal would increase traffic flow. Mr. Diem indicated that S Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 Regular Meeting Page 5 they did hire a surveyor, who specializes in traffic studies, but reminded the residents that this facility would mainly be used only on Sundays and Wednesday evenings. Commissioner Brasaemle inquired if the building would be one-story. Mr. Diem indicated that the facility would be first-floor at grade and a basement for a total of 2,002 square feet. Mr. Diem at this time showed the plans to the residents. Some of the drainage concerns were discussed, mainly the flow of drainage on the site. The applicant assured the Commission and the resident that he had been in contact with Rice Creek Watershed District and noted that there is currently a filtration system in place along County Road H. Some residents were still concerned with the water flowing to the north. Mr. Diem assured the residents that all water would drain to a gravel bed to the south. Steve Borden, 3009 County Road H, addressed the Planning Commission expressing his concern regarding drainage of the property. He asked if additional water would be draining to County Road H. Mr. Diem indicated that they are proposing a filtration and detention area and there is the availability of berms, curb cuts, etc. to slow the water down. He also indicated that more water would be flowing, however, the rate would be controlled. He also indicated that they will try to provide more green space and are proposing more green space on the southwest corner of the property and will address any aesthetic issues. • Barb Cloues, 2875 County Road H, asked why the church would be allowed in an R-1 District. • Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 Regular Meeting Page 6 The Planning Commission responded by indicating that churches are an allowed use by conditional use permit in an R-1 District. She also had a concern regarding the future growth of the facility and what would happen to the building if the church vacates. Mr. Diem explained that the structure being proposed is twice the size needed to allow for future growth and, if the congregation did become too large, part of the congregation would be moved to a new building. He indicated that a majority of the congregation now lives in the Mounds View area. Ms. Cloues also asked what the church would be used for. Mr. Diem explained that Sunday School would begin at 8:45 a.m., worship services would be held at 10 a.m. and 5 p.m., the choir meets twice a month, a evening worship service is held on Wednesdays at 8 p.m. and also noted that the average attendance on Sunday is 60-70 people at the morning services, 20 people at the evening services and 20 people at the Wednesday service. Lyle Bellis, 2977 County Road H, asked why the church didn't rebuild their current facility in the Midway area. Mr. Diem again stated that a majority of the members live in this area. Barb Cloues, 2875 County Road H, inquired about the parking issue and whether there was enough and was concerned about off-street parking. The applicant indicated that no off- street parking is needed and that 17-18 cars is the most they have had at one time. Rochelle Moon, 6929 Pleasant View Drive, inquired as to why the church doesn't get a property better suited for the facility with more • green space. • Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 Regular Meeting Page 7 Dan Moon, 6929 Pleasant View Drive, referenced another particular property that the church had been looking at. The applicant indicated this particular property had an easement running through it which would not make it a desirable site for the church. Steve Borden, 3009 County Road H, indicated that he is aware of land available on Highway 10, on both sides, that may be better suited. The applicant explained that the ability for a church to build in a residential district has been protected. He also explained that other properties that they had looked at did not have sewer and water to the site which would cost more to install than the lot itself. Lyle Bellis, 2977 County Road H, mentioned that a developer (Steve Borden at this time indicated that the developer was Larry Beach and that he was told by Mr. Beach that his _ name could be used at this meeting) tried to develop the property with no cooperation from the City. Planning Associate Pruitt responded by indicating that she has not been approached by Mr. Beach regarding development of this site. Commissioner Brooks asked whether or not church representatives are aware of neighboring property owners' objection to this proposal. Mr. Diem explained that, in his experience, the development of schools and churches is always opposed. He further explained that typically commercial development doesn't create as much controversy since those properties are already zoned for that particular use. • Rochelle Moon, 6929 Pleasant View Drive, explained that she has nothing personal Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 Regular Meeting Page 8 against churches but does have a concern about the church parking lot being next to her house. Mr. Diem indicated that landscaping is required for a buffer. Commissioner Brasaemle asked where the parking issue stands with the 22 stall difference from what is required. Planning Associate Pruitt explained that the building inspector has gone over the floor plans based on maximum occupancy load of the building and that the applicant would need to show proof of permanent seating for the facility. Community Development Director Sheldon indicated that there is a one stall per four seat required per City Code and that 32 stalls currently are proposed. Lyle Bellis, 2977 County Road H, asked whether or not the church congregation was required to sing and was concerned about the noise level. The applicant indicated that, yes, they would be singing and said that construction would consist of 6 inch insulated walls. Barb Cloues, 2875 County Road H, asked if photographs were available. The applicant inaicated that he would bring the photographs to the next meeting. Planning Associate Pruitt informed the residents that she indicated to the applicant that this item would more than likely be tabled so the applicant was not prepared to make a presentation at this meeting. Lynn Widseth, 3001 County Road H, said that she was not aware of a previous meeting that was held regarding this issue. Planning Associate Pruitt explained that a public hearing • is only required at the City Council level and Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 Regular Meeting Page 9 that this informational meeting at the Planning Commission level was held as a courtesy. Lyle Bellis, 2977 County Road H, again expressed his concerns regarding the traffic issue. Chair Peterson asked the applicant to describe the design of the building. The applicant at this time gave a brief description of the lay-out and indicated that floor plans would be presented at the next meeting. Rochelle Moon, 6929 Pleasant View Drive, expressed her concerns that if a berm was installed it may dry out. Chair Peterson noted that at this time questions are taken regarding • the building structure, and they would get into drainage issues and show how the grade works later. Lynn Widseth, 3001 County Road H, asked if there were any handicapped individuals in the congregation and was concerned about handicapped persons escaping during a fire. The applicant indicated that currently there are no handicapped individuals in the congregation and explained that it is a requirement that two staircases be installed along with egress windows (which would accommodate the handicapped) in the basement. Barb Cloues, 2875 County Road H, expressed her concerns about the security issue and that she sees very little police traffic on County Road H. The applicant explained that vandalism is a product of our society and, as always, is at the risk of the property owners. He also indicated that churches have the same • ratio for vandalism as strip malls. Chair Peterson asked if a monitored security system • Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 Regular Meeting Page 10 would be installed? The applicant explained that to put a security system in would be the decision of the owner and also informed them that the church is self-insured. Barb Cloues, 2875 County Road H, was concerned about her safety. The applicant indicated that the rate of loss to a retail mall is less than that of residential property. Steve Borden, 3009 County Road H, asked if the lighting on the site would be on. The applicant explained that no direct illumination is allowed onto adjacent properties. Lyle Bellis, 2977 County Road H, asked what the addresses of the congregation members 411 were and how many were south of Highway 36. The applicant informed Mr. Bellis that 5 percent of the congregation lived south of Highway 36 and approximately 20 percent live in Mounds View. Chair Peterson asked the applicant to address the drainage issues. Mr. Diem began by explaining that better than 150 feet is going towards the west and exiting at a controlled rate to Pleasant View Drive and the remainder to County Road H. The Planning Commission noted that the Engineer expressed concern with filtration. Mr. Diem continued to explain the drainage for the site. The applicant stated that they are proposing to move the building farther to the west, some additional parking would then be in back and more green space would be created at the exit. Lyle Bellis, 2977 County Road H, inquired about the proposal to widen County Road H. ilkChair Peterson informed him that Planning Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 1111 Regular Meeting Page 11 Commission was not aware of any plans to widen County Road H. Steve Borden, 3009 County Road H, expressed his concern with the parking elevations and the lot draining to the northeast and running through his yard. The applicant explained that the entrance will be high enough to contain the drainage and then recapped the proposed drainage plans for the site and the proposed lay-out of the building. Barb Cloues, 2895 County Road H, was concerned about the 3/12 slope to the Borden's property. The applicant explained that they would not be changing the grade near the Borden's property to the east. Commissioner 411 Miller was concerned with the accumulation of water on the north side of the building. The applicant said that there would no accumulation and demonstrated the proposed water flow for the site. Lyle Bellis, 2977 County Road H, asked if there would be an entrance on County Road H. The applicant stated that yes there would be an entrance onto County Road H and that he has contacted Ramsey County and was informed that there would be no plans to update County Road H. Steve Borden, 3009 County Road H, indicated that he believed that there are plans to update County Road H in 1999 and was concerned about that green space that would be removed from the church for this project. The applicant indicated that if Ramsey County plans to widen County Road H they would first need to buy property from the existing residents in order to do so. He also indicated that the green space proposed for this project is not on an easement Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 Regular Meeting Page 12 and that at least a five foot setback would be required for the installation of sidewalks along County Road H. Commissioner Brasaemle informed Mr. Diem that the sidewalk along Long Lake Road abuts the property line because there wasn't enough space to provide five feet and also that a temporary construction easement was given by the residents. Chair Peterson asked the applicant to address the snow storage issue. Mr. Diem explained that 2 percent of the green space proposed for the site will be used as snow storage with the additional storage coming from one parking space. Steve Borden, 3009 County Road H, inquired . as to the parking lot setbacks. Planning Associate Pruitt indicated that there is a five foot minimum setback requirement. Mr. Borden also expressed that he believes that parking requirements should be calculated by maximum occupancy of the building. Community Development Director Sheldon explained that parking is tied to permanent seating capacity. Dan Moon, 6929 Pleasant View Drive, asked if there would be concurrent use of Sunday school and church services and was concerned about the parking issue. The applicant indicated that there would be no concurrent used for these activities and that it has never happened. Lynn Widseth, 3001 County Road H, asked what the denomination of the church is? The applicant stated that it is Christian, the New Apostolic Church. • • Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 Regular Meeting Page 13 Dave Griffen, 2965 County Road H, inquired as to what the church is doing now with their property? Mr. Diem explained that the church is currently renting because their facility has been sold. Barb Cloues, 2897 County Road H, again expressed her concerns regarding alternative parking and Chair Peterson assured her that these issues will be addressed. Ms. Cloues also inquired as to the signage that would be on site. The applicant explained that there would be an illuminated cross on the building and a sign would show the name of the church, service and Sunday school times and it would be located on the building near the entrance. 4110 Additional snow storage issues were reiterated and the applicant explained that snow storage will not be located in areas where water is expected to drain. Shelley Borden, 3009 County Road H, asked the Planning Commission what "tabling" this item means? The Planning Commission explained that there is not enough information to make a decision at this time. Planning Associated Pruitt-rioted at tlris-ti-rrre that a wetland alteration permit is also needed. Community Development Director Sheldon asked when the City could expect to receive the needed items for review from the applicant. Mr. Diem indicated that they would be supplied in one week and will be shown to the Planning Commission at the next meeting. The informational meeting was closed at 9:00 • p.m. • Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 Regular Meeting Page 14 Community Development Director Sheldon indicated that we will need to review new plans to determine what the variance request is. Chair Peterson and Commissioner Brasaemle expressed their concerns that this proposal did not meet the criteria for granting a variance. The applicant indicated that they are seeking a variance in order to add green space but that locating the building on the site is workable without a variance. Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Brooks to table this item with no action to be taken before their September 4, 1996, meeting. 5 ayes 0 nays 410 Motion Carried Commissioner Brasaemle informed the residents of the next Planning Commission meeting dates of Wednesday, August 21 and the regular meeting to be held on September 4, 1996. Planning Associate Pruitt informed the Commission that she would be writing the applicant a letter requesting an additional 60 days in order to process the application. Community Development Director Sheldon 7. Consideration of reviewed this item indicating that the Mounds Resolution No. View ordinance requires development contracts 470-96 Regarding for almost every step in the development Ordinance No. 588 process, whether the step involves (Chapter 1006.06) improvements or not. It is staffs understanding that the purpose of the requirement is to make sure improvements are completed. She recommended that, for private improvements, a better approach would be to allow applicants to proceed without posting security. If, at the time • Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 Regular Meeting Page 15 when the applicant wants occupancy of the building, the items are not completed, the City would decide if it would allow security to be posted and occupancy permits to be issued, or require that the improvements be completed. Right now the City requires that the applicant put up security before construction is started, when the usual practice is to construct private improvements along with construction of the building. There are occasions when improvements such as landscaping cannot be completed until the next growing season because of weather. In these situations, security could be required for installation of the landscaping and an occupancy permit issued. For public improvements such as sidewalks, curb and gutter, streets, etc., development contracts and security are needed and no change is proposed in this requirement. She expressed that development contracts are not needed for proposals such as oversized garages. Resolution No. 470-96 talks about making these minor items exempt because no other improvements are involved. It was requested by the Planning Commission that Resolution No. 470-96 be amended to state that the Planning Commission recommend and the City Council grant waivers when such contracts are not needed to fulfill the requirements of the ordinance, rather than exempt certain situations. The Planning Commission discussed that there are some cases when the construction of an oversized garage involves removal of other structures and then a development contract and security is needed. Motion/Second: Miller/Brasaemle to table the consideration of Resolution No. 470-96 • regarding Ordinance No. 588 amending the development contract language of chapter • Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 Regular Meeting Page 16 1006.06, Subdivision 4, of the Municipal Code, with direction to staff that the Planning Commission review the specific wording of the proposed ordinance revision before it is sent to City Council. (Commissioner Brooks left the meeting at 9:30 p.m.) 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Planning Associate Pruitt reviewed this item 8. Consideration of indicating that the City of Mounds View was Resolution No. informed that the City's flood plain ordinance is 471-96 Regarding not considered compliant by the Minnesota Ordinance No. 589 Department of Natural Resources and that a (Chapter 1301, Flood • nonconforming uses section and a section Plain Zoning) addressing travel trailers is encouraged to be added. She also indicated that this ordinance needs to be in place by September 1, 1996, or the City of Mounds View will be suspended from the FEMA program. The Planning Commission inquired as to how much of Mounds View is affected. (A FEMA map was shown to the Planning Commission at this time). Motion/Second: Johnston/Brasaemle to recommend approval of Resolution No. 471-96 as amended by Staff to meet Department of Natural Resources (DNR) criteria, regarding Ordinance No. 589 amending Chapter 1301, entitled "Flood Plain Zoning". 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Planning Associate Pruitt informed the 9. Staff Report Planning Commission that she has accepted a position with the City of Hastings and will be Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 • Regular Meeting Page 17 leaving the City of Mounds View with August 30 as her last day. She also introduced the new Community Development Director, Pamela Sheldon, and welcomed her aboard and thanked the Planning Commission for their cooperation and understanding during her time as Acting Community Development Director. All members were present at the July 24, 1996, 10. Report of Chair agenda meeting. Also present were Planning Associate Pruitt and Community Development Director Sheldon. Chair Peterson requested that the agenda be changed to contain not only the Chair's Report but also that it include the other Planning Commissioners. • There being no further business before the 11. Adjournment Planning Commission, Chair Peterson adjourned the meeting at 9:40 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Pamela Sheldon Community Development Director All .. . 1 '^ 9 'l lF GSLe-0-6- 06)1---) eKz7,-) n IU /I/CO& 69 Y` ?' UIQ'() b/2. 0LP PV 0\ot:4...Ai Col Q Q kso-Lsoev.i\-o't Ut) 61 Yeida;L, dexn &&‘,1 /67ad 6a/z1,- X 75 Co ad 'Il ut'r e tintv. : -o ofa fuer• 0 d Lutiroxi tris 300I (Dc,t,nRiff MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION ' • RESOLUTION NO. 468-96 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 87-81 WITH MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK, BUILDING G, 5251 PROGRAM AVENUE, PLANNING CASE NO. 453-96 WHEREAS, Everest Development, Ltd. has submitted an amendment to Development Agreement No. 87-81 with Mounds View Business Park, Building G, for site plan changes; and WHEREAS, the parking spaces along the east of the property will have a net increase of 35 parking stalls, and the east parking area will be reconfigured for angled parking stalls and restriped; WHEREAS, the parking stalls to the south of the building will be restriped; WHEREAS, the parking to the north of the building will not be altered; WHEREAS, the total parking stalls provided on the site will equal 500 stalls; WHEREAS, Staff, and the Planning Commission have undertaken review of the proposal; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the changes will not adversely affect the project nor the adjacent residential areas; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the revised site plan for Building G's parking lot, Mounds View Business Park, contingent upon the following: 1. A landscaping plan be submitted subject to approval of the City Forester. 2. Approval and all necessary permits be obtained from Rice Creek Watershed District. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 7th day of August 1996. ATTEST: , Chairpe esn ' -terson (SEAL) • • Pam Sheldon, Community Development Director MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION • RESOLUTION NO. 469-96 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW • COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST OF EVEREST DEVELOPMENT LTD.,MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK,BUILDING G, 5251 PROGRAM AVENUE,PLANNING CASE NO. 453-96 WHEREAS, Everest Development,Ltd.has requested City approval to amend Development Agreement 87-81 to increase parking by 35 stalls along the east of the building and restripe the parking stalls to the south of the building; WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a development review be conducted for this and similar proposals;and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this development proposal: 1. Planning Application dated July 19, 1996 2. Site Plan dated July 11, 1996 3. Approval and all necessary permits be obtained from Rice Creek Watershed District. WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has determined that the proposal is in conformance with all applicable requirements of Title 1100. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the development review request, contingent upon the following: 1. Everest Development, Ltd. enter into a development agreement with the City of Mounds View. 2. A landscaping plan be submitted and installed, subject to approval of the City Forester. 3. Approval and all necessary permits be obtained from Rice Creek Watershed District. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 7th day of August 1996. ATTEST: Chairper n P ' rson• (SEAL) i�t t/kJ� Pari Sheldon, Community Development Director • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 471-96 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING AMENDING THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 1301, RELATING TO FLOOD PLAIN ZONING IN ORDINANCE NO. 589 WHEREAS, Chapter 1301, entitled"Flood Plain Zoning," is currently not in compliance with the Federal Emergency Management Agency requirements; and WHEREAS, a compliant floodplain ordinance is a prerequisite of a community's eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); and WHEREAS, NFIP provides federal and state assistance in the event of flooding, denial of flood insurance in a community, allows the opportunity for citizens to purchase flood and related water damage insurance; and WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View is committed to reducing flood damage potential through a properly administered and compliant floodplain ordinance; and • WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends modification to Chapter 1301, entitled"Flood Plain Zoning", to add the required provisions by amending the definitions of structure in Section 1301.04, Subd. 15,; Section 1301, Subd. 7, on Flood Insurance Notice and Record Keeping; Section 1301.10, Subd. 5, on Travel Vehicles and Travel Vehicles; Section 1301.10, Subd. 2.c.(3) on Accessory Structures; and Section 1301, Subd. 2, on Nonconforming Uses, and to correct minor typographical errors and errors in cross-references. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Mounds View recommends approval of Ordinance No. 589, an ordinance amending Chapter 1301, entitled"Flood Plain Zoning," of the Mounds View Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this Resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 7th day of August 1996 ATTEST: Cha'uP efon Peterson Pk/MALL(SEAL) i4 . Pdm Sheldon, Community Development Director