Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-16-1991 11, MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 16, 1991 7:30 P.M. AGENDA SESSION 1. Review Minutes: January 2, 1991 (Enclosed) 2. Review Comprehensive Plan Update 1111 00 PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION IIICITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting UNAPPR II January 2, 1991 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds View Planning Commission was called to 1. Call to Order order by Chair Mountin at 7:32 p.m. on Wednesday, January 2, 1991. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Colleen, Jones, 2 . Roll Call Miller, Peterson, Zollner and Chair Mountin. Commissioner Burgers had an excused absence. ALSO PRESENT: Planning Technician Harrington and Councilmember Wuori. Motion/Second: Zollner/Jones to approve the November 3. Approval of 7, 1990 minutes as presented. Minutes: November 7, IP es 1990 a y 0 nays Motion Carried There were no residents requests or comments from the 4 . Residents floor. Requests and Comments From The Floor - Resolution No. 304-91 was reviewed by the Plarai. g 5 . Consideration Commission. Chair Mountin expressed the Planning of Resolution Commission's concerns regarding the rescheduling of No. 304-91 meeting dates around holidays . It was noted that a Regarding change was made to the resolution to include review Meeting and of regular agenda items at their agenda meeting be a Timeline Dates minimum of two weeks prior to the regular meeting. for 1991 Motion/Second: Miller/Colleen to approve Resolution No. 304-91, establishing meeting and timeline submission dates for 1991. 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried was noted that Mr. John Engberg was present and 6 . Consideration t at he had received a copy of the proposed of Resolution resolution and agenda in the mail. It was also noted No. 305-91 that the Planning Commission had reviewed this Regarding request at their last agenda session. Variance , a g ii-\ i ---1 cip , Mounds View Planning Commissio AFi o al anuary 2, 1991 Regular Meeting Page Two ill Motion/Second: Jones/Peterson to approve Resolution Request by John No. 305-91, denying the variance request by John Engberg, 3030 Engberg, 3030 County Road J, to allow 1,644 square County Road J, feet of accessory building area where only 1,264 • Planning Case square feet is allowed by Mounds View Municipal Code,' No. 305-91 Planning Case No. 304-90. 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried It was explained to Mr. Engberg that he had the option to appeal the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council and that a public hearing would be scheduled. Mr. Engberg informed the Planning Commission that he intended to appeal the decision. It was noted that Mr. Greg Johnson was present and 7 . Consideration that he had received a copy of the proposed of Resolution resolution and agenda in the mail. It was also noted No. 306-91 that this request was discussed at length at the Regarding previous agenda session. Rezoning G Request by The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Greg Johnson, resolution. Planning Technician Harrington noted 2865 Hwy. 10, that the Comprehensive Plan's designation of the Planning Case III property is medium density residential. No. 320-90 Motion/Second: Miller/Jones to approve Resolution No. 306-91, recommending denial of the rezoning request from R-O to B-3 for Greg Johnson, 2865 Highway 10, Planning Case No. 320-90. 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried s. It was explained to. Mr. Johnson that he could appeal -,- the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council and that a public hearing would be scheduled. Mr. Johnson expressed his desire to appeal the decision and informed the Planning Commission that his attorney has prepared a presentation to be provided to the City Council at the hearing. It was noted that Ms . Barb Depew was present and that 8 . Consideration she had received a copy of the agenda in the mail. A of Resolution copy of the proposed resolution was distributed at No. 307-91 the meeting. Regarding Major Subdivision The Planning Commission reviewed proposed Resolution Request by No. 307-91 making one minor change. Planning Wayne & BarbOil Technician Harrington advised that a revised Depew, 2601/ Certificate of Survey for the property would be 2617 Sherwood, "'. 1 r'. p Rf' r�, /,"ate Mounds View Planning Commi0-,tanuary 2, 1991 Regular Meeting Page Three 411 needed showing utility easements and -otential right- PlanningCase P g of-way property for the extension of Greenwood Drive. No. 319-90 Motion/Second: Miller/Jones to approve Resolution No. 307-91, recommending approval of the major subdivision request by Wayne and Barb Depew, 2601 and 2617 Sherwood Road, Planning Case No. 319-90 . 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mr. Tim Nelson of Everest Development, representing 9 . Consideration Tyson Trucking, was present to discuss this proposal. of Resolution He indicated that this request was discussed at No. 308-91 length at the last Planning Commission Agenda Regarding Final Session. Site Plan Review by Mr. Nelson referred to this proposal as the "third Everest Dev. , phase" of the project. He reported 4825 Mustang to the Planning Commission on the parking situation. Circle, He pointed out that additional parking is available Planning Case if, in the future, the use of the property would No. 266-89 change. He also explained that Ramsey County Parks and Open Space had concerns regarding the landscape ,lan and the tree loss that would be experienced as result of the project. It was specified that two- thirds of the trees would remain and one-third would be lost. Mr. Nelson addressed this issue reporting that the lost trees, which consisted of Cottonwood, Aspen and Willow, would be replaced with a similar species . He also stated that the intensity of the plan was found to be satisfactory to the City Forester. Mr. Nelson further explained the visibility of the project from adjacent properties and affirmed that adequate screening would be -- provided. He indicated that the landscaping on Mustang Drive and around the parking area would be the same as specified on the site plan for the truck expansion. Mr. Nelson summarized by indicating that representatives from Twin City Testing would be on- site during the project to supervise the disposal of any hazardous construction materials. It was asserted that soil borings taken on the property would reveal any contaminants that exist. Motion/Second: Jones/Miller to adopted Resolution No. 308-91, recommending approval of the final site 4Wlan design submitted by Everest Development, 4825 stang Circle, Planning Case No. 266-89 . 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 1 N&PpRmIFnMounds View Planning Commission January 2, 1991 Regular Meeting Page Four III There was no Staff report. 10. Staff Report Chair Mountin welcomed the new recording secretary. 11. Report of Chair The attendees at the December 19, 1990 agenda session were Commissioners Zollner, Jones, Burgers, and Peterson. It was noted that Commissioners Miller, Colleen and Chair Mountin had excused absences . Chair Mountin expressed some concerns regarding the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission discussed development alternatives for properties along Highway 10, north of Silver Lake Road. Mr. Harrington was asked to provide information at the next agenda meeting regarding the feasibility of special needs housing in the area and its conformance to the Comprehensive Plan. , There being no further business before the Planning 12 . Adjournment Commission, Chair Mountin adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m. • Respectfully submitted, Paul Harrington - _ Planning Technician MEMORANDUM 411 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING TECHNICIAN HARRINGTON DATE: January 10, 1991 SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND UPDATE I have been in contact with the person who was updating the graphics for the Comprehensive Plan. He has assured me that I will have all the materials he has available by Wednesday evenings meeting. I will provide all the materials I receive at that time. Additionally, a map indicating the lot dimensions and sizes will be provided for the area immediately surrounding the former K- Gas property along Highway 10 . This will be provided to assist the Commission in formulating a goal/idea for that area. If you have any questions regarding this item, please feel free 0 to call. S