HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-17-1991 • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 17, 1991
7:30 P.M.
AGENDA SESSION
1. Review Minutes: July 2, 1991 (Enclosed)
2. Consideration of Variance Request by Norb Yenish, 2149 Program Avenue,
Planning Case No. 324-91
3. Consideration of Rezoning Request by Conoco, Inc., 2740 Highway 10, Planning
Case No. 326-91 .
4. Review Comprehensive Plan Update Maps
•
****************************************************************
APPLICANTS: YOUR A'1'1'ENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS
REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY CITY HALL AT 784-3055
IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. THANK YOU.
****************************************************************
0
. tY
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
• tl, :. 4 RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
UNI\iPjpj:i �$ , � .t July 2, 1991
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
The Mounds View Planning Commission was called to 1. Call to Order
order by Chair Mountin at 7 :33 p.m. on Wednesday,
July 2, 1991.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Miller, Burgers, 2 . Roll Call
Peterson, and Chair Mountin.
Commissioners Colleen and Jones had unexcused
absences.
ALSO PRESENT: Planning Technician Harrington,
Councilmember Blanchard, and Recording Secretary
Benesch. .
3 . Approval of
Commissioner Peterson asked that one of the Minutes :
paragraphs in the minutes be read and clarified. June 5, 1991
`tion/Second: Burgers/Peterson to approve the
inutes of June 5, 1991, as presented.
Motion Carried
4 ayes 0 nays
'4 . Residents
There were no residents requests or comments from the Requests and
floor. Comments From
the Floor
. .
• e ' . :ri.ges was not present due to of Resolution
his wife delivering a baby today. No. 314-91,
Planner Harrington Variance
gt presented resolution no. 314-91. Request by
It was discussed by the Planning Commission whether David Bridges,
or not to place the contingency regarding the 8032 Sunnyside
utilization of footings as a "whereas " . The Planning Road
Commission agreed to adopt the resolution as
presented.
Motion/Second: Peterson/Burgers to approve
Resolution No. 314-91 regarding the variance request
David Bridges, 8032 Sunnyside Road, Planning Case
. 323-91.
4 ayes 0 nays
Mounds View Planning Commission lN'y 2, 1991
Regular Meeting Page Two
Planner Harrington asked if the Planning Commission ' `aff Report
III
desired to have the meeting closed at this time to
discuss the proposal from Accessibuilding Corporation 4/*) *
for the development of a duplex at Lot 1, Block 1, izit.,40,,,,,
Dailey Knolls, and then reopen the meeting for
Planning Commission action. It was the concencus of
the Planning Commission to leave the meeting open and
continue with the discussion of this proposal.
It was noted that Mr. Michael Jordan and Mr. Craig
Rushmier, representing the Accessibuilding
Corporation, were present.
Planner Harrington provided the Planning Commission
with a copy of the site plan, planning application
and letter of intent from Accessibuilding Corporation
regarding the construction of a duplex on Silver Lake
Road (Dailey Knolls, Lot 1, Block 1) .
Chair Mountin requested that in the future a
landscape plan be provied for duplex proposals.
Chair Mountin inquired as to the setback requirements
of the proposed duplex on Silver Lake Road. Mr.
Jordon indicated he would like to set the structure
back 10 to 15 feet further than required on Silver
Lake Road and have a "U" shaped driveway to allowIII
easier accessibility to Silver Lake Road.
Planner Harrington indicated that according to City
Code, a 30 foot setback from the right-of-way line of •
Silver Lake Road is required. He also informed the •
Planning Commission that there were no adjoining
structures that would figure into the setback
requirements .
Commissioner Miller questioned the option of two
driveways as noted on the proposed resolution, and if
it is possible to have a "U" shaped driveway.
Planner Harrington indicated a "U" shaped driveway is
allowed by Code on the property.
Commissioner Burgers questioned the need for a single
driveway. Planner Harrington informed the Planning
Comission that with two driveways, 40 feet was needed
between them. With configuration of the structure
and easement requirement, the required 40 feet could
be obtained. Mr. Jordan stated that he and Planner
Harrington would visit the site to determine the best
access option.
Planner Harrington indicated that it should be110
included in the resolution that a landscape
. T 11/4/
Mounds View Planning Commission my 2, 1991
Regular Meeting .e Three
plan be approved by the City Forester. The drainage
407/
easement existing on the property was also addressed,
and Chair Mountin requested that this item also be
added to proposed Resolution No. 315-91.
Mr. Jordan presented a site plan to the Planning
Commission.
Grading on the site was addressed, and it was noted
that this property is not located in a wetland and
that the existing drainage easement is the buffer.
Motion/Second: Peterson/Burgers to approve
Resolution No. 315-91 with the following additions :
a drainage easement be provided on site, a landscape
plan be approved by the City Forester, and a final
grading plan be approved by the City Engineer.
4 ayes 0 nays
Planner Harrington distributed "rough-draft" copies Motion Carried
of the Comprehensive Plan update to the Planning
Commission for their review.
•mmjssioner Miller noted that she would be absent
om the August 1, 1991, Planning Commission meeting.
Chair Mountin questioned why the composte site
located in the City was locked today. Planner
Harrington indicated that he had heard that night
dumping of non-compost items was taking place and 7 . Report of Chair
that the compost site was probably locked to help
prevent further dumping.
It was noted that Commissioners Burgers, Colleen,
Jones, Miller, Peterson and Chair Mountin were
present at the June 19th Agenda Session.
There being no further business before the Planning
Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 7 :58 p.m.
8 . Adjournment
Respectfully submitted,
Paul Harrington
410 Planner
MEMORANDUM
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: �, .
PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER
DATE: July 11, 1991
SUBJECT: VARIANCE, MOUNDS VIEW INN, 2149 PROGRAM AVENUE
Mr. Norb Yenish, representing Mounds View Inn, has made
application for a variance to allow the construction of a
pedestal sign at a height of 50 '-0" where only 35 '-0" is allowed
by Municipal Code. Chapter 39 . 14 Subdivision 2 (6) of the
Municipal Code states that no pedestal sign shall exceed 35 '-0 " .
Currently, a 35 '-0 " pedestal sign is located on the property.
The applicant has indicated that he would locate the proposed
sign in the same location as the existing sign.
The request, as submitted, meets all other applicable sections of
Chapter 39 of the Municipal Code, "Signs and Billboards" .
• I have included all the appropriate application materials
received in regard to this request for your review.
If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to
give me a call.
I
•
1 . _./. (...._
_ - i
Ii1IilL ( oo .i. ,:300 r� 4
-- cao0
1 - ri •-• ' ,I.terr 6-tik.::, ' . ci c3
0 4
Io 0 o tb 6'
. i
._ ' '''.1-:: / i :
- • O
O ` , : •
ç4Y.
•
1-_ji0
O
9 -.I, . . 1
, , .
J . irk_._, ....,,N,\___:.
_______________1::3 A , .
II
(• r (e r r_______1 ;11.13• .,.../ ... .:41 rii
Vainiumium CI / r'-'.\ .
n Oiii i_ •
i . ,,'/\
ti
co cs2 r
°NV> . („_____ ____.______, .. t , 1 _
c
.. c _
i �� N 3 oQ OR
4.• Wn •r Z !i: i c:„
v 1
m . ___. FA....b i
. if) i ---....,__1_t_______:_j____.:_....j& .
iiNTEr/STATE-35W .../�
I -- • -_
9
bcjf::
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
PLANNING APPLICATION
Date - /o- y/.
APPLICANT: Name /Y dR� F#'UIs '7�S_�'rs`/
Phone
Address /L(7 �/t ff -MMM( Ali V Piga( t 5f/2—
Interest in Property (Check Appropriate Blank) : •
/ Owner of Record Lessee, Operator, Manager
Contractor for Deed Owner Agreement to Purchase •
Other (Expl ain)
Documentary evidence of applicant' s interest inthe property may be required
before final City action on this request.
PROPERTY: Address/General Location I/etc::/As )/i free) _-2/1/9 PAo 1�RAi9it ll� i l�Rk( /7#'- 3SJ/z
(� /
Legal Owner: Name/Address Ati !/E,vrs5r1 fF AciciRrsc
Present Use (Check Appropriate Blank) :
Undevel oped/Vacant Apartment
Singl e Family Dwell iny /Business Esabl ishment
Dupl ex Dwell iny Industrial Establ ishment
Multiple Dwell iny (3-6 units)
Other (expl ain)
Property Classification: Abstract Torrens
REQUEST: (Expl ain) &ifS� f7 � h� D s�q4/ fd'/I1 yzl �d
l
I hereby declare that the above statements are true. ,1 4 ��
signature)
:OR OFFICE USE ONLY:
TOTAL BASE *(Base Fees are Non-Refundabl e)
DEPOSIT FEES
Subdivision , Major $250 ($150) TOTAL FEES PAID Q6"-M -
Subdivision , Minor $100 ($75) Date Paid -/o.-
Rezoning _$100 ($50) Receipt Number .36-801,5Conditional Use $100 ($50)
Variance $75 ($50) 9�--6d
Code Appeal $100 ($50) Park Fund Dedication
Alteration Permit $150 ($50) Date Paid
Plan Review $100 ($50) Receipt Number
Other ($50)
PLANNING SIGN $ 50 Addt'l Fees Paid
Date Paid
( Receipt Number
.
TJ �� _1
• _N `n' i.F'g, ry _ _ tta+ .- 'moi- #r '
i4,. 5 (�'
g .'
4.
.. - te �.r .
i i,,,t, "2 - - ,`„moo`'
w
•
,r
",,,,o;:`,4.-,,,-:-..;',,.,-,--.:µ`c f `
s :iir i2itiii •3•!Y;iSil3fssYi2t +g2:F- AR- �---, s; 4.i;ift ��!):r??1 } I.:ii}:2 n ': sr •
$`.710
1's � T
ii
' •� �s� = _ -:a
�t � �sox
ryK
1 '4.. ..J _, ..M* 4 1-Y f.,
:.Fp�i�.Lwa a '�!.' Y
1 .cry L A r
r
_ 1'SF" ------ .. ti..,....,..„...._t .
_ _,,-0 --„ -. _.
t
eq
I co
—I
2
•
01
•
co w
N.
BUSINESS
l 8c 5
v.
1 • .
j1104.0- �,,.
Q O •
.
_E �o DRIVE � _
05 80 /494.98 80
d -
M I M Q
�5� PARK o v
1 o
C
>• D _ # Cr i
At NI /
2 /�l o I
86
-,.., /034.3' 1
0- 7x64 /D'4-7.3Z —.
- \'�� � �(4')
N
P
763/ /0- Z.60 ouTLOT .4
%914 84+71 T� 255.02 223.15 r - 8a 14-� a .,;sir 0
byNkO A • J4
5 �P • �, - -- -,-;- - -- :-
14.014k co •
R ' Q G� 1 0 �9 • g (2) \�
ip/
5 112 Q` Id ._f 1
�I �. 209.5 \ ` '
;:
MP
\04) • s Q I (7) A co 0gyy�
i
• 4b0- I 9 i6 r
i
IP
9 '4.'6\ i
.910.c. )
I50
•
3
33o k
RC1 -- -- -.� /" ua
4 i r
CO
RD j 7. 1 .. ..
g
5
O
IIa
42
gx I1111111 \\\# 9 AH OAM
74
3
_ rAR
R u ARMK
e r.\\.,,,,,: 41::::i 4%., ,....
AW
. ,--- :...,.: !I
1
11 i_f .,
:41 ,, ; .
,[1r1 '.
y
Ifin
WAR
1° PARK 7 A.
4 ,.
__Li NCO ROM Iq �� n
_wi
g \,<7\7)\:]
!, Lril 2
rat
zsx
Spring Lake g r -,--„, 1
—ea - � — 9 III
ff!T[71G SCHOOL
9 �c 3 IlEirj""°C::
Y 5 S&WR 1E1f PARK 'v T
•
i :...=2.
.«.. IN'....
rRRCNSOM X �q
C LANKIfT R r
11:17' peRtc
YlfRi C
1 CI£M.fM ALE 0- °
C
CR --- '-- -. i4:"..111111111
WIC_oCR� ,.
n �c ncn
. .
SPmNG\401 a # $ . ,....,
sKCL g6,tOC
[ pill
fl rn 3
s( PHcsarwe
44
Norby Yenish 1
2149 Program Avenue
Planning Case No. 324-91
1
ITEM: 3
MEMORANDUM
•
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION 1
FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER yam^
DATE: July 10, 1991
SUBJECT: REZONING, 2740 HIGHWAY 10
Mr. Alan Brevitz, representing Conoco Inc. , has made application
for the rezoning of property located at 2740 Highway 10.
Currently, the property is zoned B-2, Limited Business. The
applicant is requesting that the property be rezoned to B-3, ,
Highway Commercial.
The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as mixed use
planned unit development(PUD) .
Conoco Inc. has submitted preliminary plans for the site and a
copy has been provided for your review.
411 If there is any additional information you need, please do not
hesitate to give me a call.
0
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
PLANNING APPLICATION
Date June 28, 1991
APPLICANT: Name Conoco Inc. (A Dupont Subsidiary) % Alan B. Brevitz Phone (612)571-361•
Address 268 Commerce Circle South - Fridley, MN. 55432
Interest in Property (Check Appropriate Blank) :
Owner of Record Lessee, Operator, Manager
— Contractor for Deed Owner X Agreement to Purchase
Other (Explain)
Documentary evidence of applicant' s interest in the property may be required
before final City action on this request.
PROPERTY: Address/General Location 2740 Hwy. 10 Adjacent to 2732 Hwy 10. or Generally
the S.W.C. - State Hwy. 10 and Silver Lake Road.
Legal Owner: Name/Address Mr. George J. Winiecki - 2732 N. E. Hwy #10 -
Mounds View, MN 55112 - (612) 780-5600
Present Use (Check Appropriate Blank) :
X Undevel oped/Vacant Apartment
Sinyl e Famil y Dwell i ny X Business Esabl ishment
Dupl ex Dwell my Industrial Establ ishment
Mul tipl a Dwell my (3-6 units) — •
Other (expl ain)
Property Classification: Part XAbstract + Part X Torrens
REQUEST: (Explain) Rezoning from B-2 limited business district to B-3 highway
business district to allow for the new development of a prototype Conoco
retail gasoline facility and convenience 'rood store with an automatic car wash.
I hereby decl are that the above statements are true. - Z .
Alan B. Brevitz (siynatur
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
TOTAL BASE *(Base Fees are Non-Refundabl e)
DEPOSIT FEES
-Subdivision , Major ($250-� ($150) TOTAL FEES PAID
Subdivision , Minor $100 ($75) Date Paid
Rezoning 1l00% ($50) X Receipt Number
-Conditional Use S-10e ($50)
Variance $75 ($50)
Code Appeal $100 ($50) Park Fund Dedication
Alteration Permit C$150-7 ($50) Date Paid
P1 an Review C$10J ($50) Receipt Number 1/0
Other ($50)
PLANNING SIGN $ 50 Addt'l Fees Paid /,,tl,de
Date Paid (0--.22g-9/
Receipt Number _3lvo2/
N
CO RD
5,
a ,.
g
,.
oY• .I1 9 ARRCd P - PARK0ii,
AN(LN
.0
O
p,,,,_.,------____,,:,-.
LAPORT ni
ROAD hii:mmilpiro.., _4_,
__
.t
.,
RR.1:
; Mr
o Ma
H R040 1 &'''. In
; N/c), . H 2 ,-,______________ I „.,
Spring Lake A- .: _ 5 r" 1�1 4 l
C° J
• 3 ElPR27AOD
•
SLIER NESE PARK •v - q1 +o ORM b ORM
_
HI a
JLNIELRTLAMOUR AN'
�< wall-44°
Cain*
ri]
•
` � .it. A. 5 [—_? ` RD tR _ 1•]
}p C{IM17'M AKDTj
, ietel I i fl
CR i
—7.41111111R_ a
MI .
8 W1
MoO0CRF3r% o n W
i n �LSL.- - r DR 301000.R.HMI F
11 i
FfMN4ltCR to „�. irl .
G...
.� rl -- — __1 CD in K
/4:34010K lk..,,J1-....\\\)I iaNcsm r we 1
Conoco, Inc, l 1 4.0-
2740
2740 Highway 10 �:-.-
Planning Case No. 326-91
40 .
�� 1