Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-18-1991 } 1 le MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 18, 1991 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of Resolution No. 327-91 Regarding Variance Request of Sysco of MN, 2400 County Road J, Planning Case No. 334-91 4. Consideration or Resolution No. 326-91 Establishing Meeting and Timeline Submission Dates for 1992 1110 AGENDA SESSION 1. Review Minutes: (No December Meeting) 2. Discussion of Conditional Use Permit Request of Town's Edge Terrace, Planning Case No. 330-91 3. Discussion of Development Request of Harstad Companies, Planning Case No. 333-91 **************************************************************** APPLICANTS: YOUR ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY CITY HALL AT 784-3055 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. THANK YOU. **************************************************************** • .0"117 - MEMORANDUM -MEMORANDUM . 0: PLANNING COMMISSION ,,ll FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER V' DATE: December 13, 1991 SUBJECT: 2400 COUNTY ROAD J, SYSCO - VARIANCE REQUEST The Minnesota Department of Transportation(MnDOT) has contacted the City regarding their need to acquire additional right-of-way on County Road J fronting the Sysco property at 2400 County Road J. This additional right-of-way is being acquired as part of the Highway 610 realignment. At the time Sysco developed their property, they were in conformance with all applicable City- codes. MnDOT's request would cause the main building on the property to be located at a setback which is less than that specified by the Code, thus creating the need for the variance. • City Engineer Ric Minetor and I will be meeting with representatives from MnDOT on Monday, December 16 to determine exactly how much right-of-way will need to be acquired. Because Sysco did not initiate the right-of-way acquisition, the City is acting on behalf of them on this item. All pertinent information from the Monday meeting between staff and MnDOT will be provided at the Wednesday meeting. MnDOT has requested that this item be resolved as quickly as possible so, I have indicated on the agenda that action may be taken on it. If you have any questions, give me a call. Sysbo Continental Foods • . 2400 County Road J Planning Case 334-91 R-x . __ OF B I N E ail • • N O 94.64 114110 'COVNT7 11010 J ' = M °'4° 9484 ,4.44"7., 8170 88 In .AM Nle r1 846584" 8455 14• Not 4468 5467 415 )R 38 Soo 0455 5164 8469 11450 8465 X % y'Qyi. RUD. / • • — )1 5152 9461 M 6443 8144 [6448 6444 3453 /4M 7} 4 . d45 • sS 6414 1430 3474 e41b 6132 5441 8464 t■ Moo 1416 8420 g4,5' 8414 5423 6429 8429 N44 • 1181:1 8406 6405 8404 8413 340e 5415 8419 . •• PF 1.41Ig,�,+� I-1 e!7! 9390 1400 93fs 6480 : . NOO 4 76FIE 8378 8564 '53181 INF 6311 6350 .994 8350 J 5770 �9310 . . 6372 8S,a 03 0 6379 11360 8386 83N �� ey1,0 .761 11368 8350 1003335 6350 6375 5573 6576 63 15 8 -345 $344 1348 3340 '6367 3340 6171 1377 •349 8360 II. 19746 6340 9331 6330 0330 8330 0357 9340 8125 I! 1 8512 t,•326 Illzs 9315 6320 .6515 3320 9326 11320 Y 8 3340 S I 33321Z.30 8300 0303 6768 g a3C4 3310 6321 18303S 8300 1 9330 • P F 1 3 i • 7609 3590 8293 1 e 6291 3250 8293 9260 5299 e!ro 7 8285 5200 0257 5250 6261 6280 8273 8260 82715 - o 6270 8251 8270 0 9271 3270 5 OYf/On i k 6z•.•• 1273 8260 s 9281 8260 °— ono 6L(7 9300 A R O A N:.; B (. , AVENu Po/�< 1125! 5250 9267 9250:9251 $2501 8255 °250 i 8293 6260 �! • ._....... r H. " » /.. -32 • am 8740_••`ro r• a v 6241 18212 0 8260 Filliii 11.0.+11`1!f1.}�( 1p ,y ..�.. • ISv ' 4 ni,,,o 0.. . az37----.1.-- NI'r IN .��N 9231 r e2v®04 N 8230 6271 •-i. / _�:: F 3110314 �N DAf7tt 7y� PFAVENUE 0247 '�[.�y7�•• $ 2• JILL aav A . ^0.350 0739 _til. N .^u 10 6203 :. ^ IRS .. 8211 $154 5193 5224 l N N 1130 ens MI_'•'i Iv tI 1SIH o �� ay,�.11.111�.�� ' 9173 8212 11:00 . • '.-.t••• 41N • E1I•if.Il .iv G�r� l•II` • 9160 ens I •.•.....••...... LAMORT ►POflT . 8143:::: `'tc:•::i28:.;;. .•IV .. 1.c 9147 6140 '1:1 :11 ' UUUUIJLI9137 i - 1 6132 _ 8125 8130 $S S_ Lpw `a� � c ©W N N N 1�.i�. :1S?=•• .09111111n 8114 i I N�N N E1 I IH 1 8101 J■ , Iti Mr7 9368 �®11 5 1313P1-1111:47F' „9 crit 1 NA g .t:9c 0051 : ge066 e07s ffi g e°!3 -;ILL. . aoes . R Ai— °°96 1 R Ai"°" 6°e� L i f 13099 !I °° Fl nil 1 Il • 1 „9065 9070 5071 WCG e071 6069 3071 eon eWl 8072 01)71 8010 BOT( • eo7v '� + --�_�.�1R1 1 u. X6075 8060 goys 8080 9055 8060 8065 6050 9060 •I . 13044....0193.7 604•" ! ,� 5W2 8045 5091 8051 8044, 5045 8046 0 8041 8044 3051 ' __ •OTS I 7944 7947 v ' J,''J ,J,yi.0 T Will 6036, — 8079 8W2 8033 0033 807 5031 8030 9026 6028 8029 ( ea0 / Z'> O 61135 . 8024 W 0027 6016 W 79+1 7940 2.•ZZ4 •J 1- ,�•/ a eon 6015 j 903 6049 o Boll 6000 i eozi QO2: eon 6030 c ? > =7939; „pile/wedJ ., ^y r`' ORIVE 9008 9803 8009¢616° eoe,z 9000 5001 Bolo 9013 5666 a 0:03 6012 ai37 1933 iiysa } 1 VIUi »7A nes 5004 7304 »90 W 71e� 1550 7399 7196 7»3 1390.71n 7394 ,7109 • ml�72 a79�1 J' ?Air .:•M~W�J�,��- \?� t 7le0-'»73 T»9 7160 0756! T990'o 7971 7990 g 7399 7970. 2 T9ea X79`°pl792_n�rjJ ' •YS.. 7960x'7963 7964 a 7'139 7570 1.. 7965--^;7989 7760;7361 7364 7775 7990 i 7371 7768 -24 '8 J r} +CtO � 1 07921 •- tJ . `=7955 7956 u 7745 7334 i 797! 7fes N 755016 7971 7- u 7937 �' 3»IT7-L2_201-7919 P F ? ` a`,�`,e�f� i��*�lL�a N 7950 7940 r 7948 7346:L_____,7327.44:4�-- H11/514W' 0 73,4 O 7953 7!M 0 1"'�_Y'W7913. iT� `va���e`�7� t 7911 7960 • h ;I W�. 7910 a 0,.,.,-.A.,fes ,+ 972 T r� 7930 7933 7930 7917 401 r•; PF 517940 7934 7.931 ill/ 11 7930 7909—`N .:)".21):3.. ��: Ri 1.j:i rs.,., 17901 903 /3001 101.3 311 n01 • U : : hQ0 `3 lO j I gi `7• I I vl�••8� 6� 6 1\; 8-3 NILLY1EW 1 d1101�30S300— - VI ' d L V T FI 04 0 I • � F7 ' _om= mum= Tari g J 7sao 7°s 4 i 7eN � 718*76a N i 2 Ill PF c r IIILL lE +� � •� _ ald a 1 a i A A i >y If ^1^' zero 766! �� 7997 nese .57 �R 7675/7869 79597°60 a61cw A p-: ,��0ti ® 7851 7860 leas 7032mm. 786117854 7957 ::: 061! 56/15619 7 7141 7890 T1s! 7844 .*7 '78477840 �~' 5813 561215613 : • OAKWC I., iti 765, 7940 7933 7140 7633'7932 11(31 it,',1343aurit /- __ Fr; ((' fL11 ®'�' 7ele 7790 78181908. rIZMMEMirria 7827 W?!!• [il�11 F. x 8-3 •9 Taos • neo ��� 1916 niF a �• F, a(. []�•] 7617 ss25amla E.'� If.�©f JE! 7e09 7901 7780 f ] isimi .• 76017800 '^- .n▪= N 1 1 �� 9-2 4® h114 7801 x770 7751 7750 1� nig 7790,4 7 I . - •T X65667 �... -7EARJIC. '�- 1. 1 s 7767 7760 MI iiiINI 774011111= rrwrT10i 7751 '` I I. Ii ” 1'1/5544554W" i '•681 W�== Wijilflig CE 1• 77x1 7770 7731 1730 ®-lr�r77277730 7741 / - a 4817 .. =Ja 7W '^ - �aiy.��y 7775 7730 7721 7750 .77pg7T100T7121Vd .a . 521 4 T7n iii 7700 nol 7700 no .,•1 A z1„55207521„ ' � 8.�'• GG i �,�¢1QN Q�;j CX+��1 + COUNTY R*I •OAD ifu _ 778•40 .'411111111111?P04 2 Elilii N NN2'.S531 1, 0 Q▪x {+ •r 7662 �7 254 - 0 .- N•N N I`I. aj COI. N {.{' r 1747 1= R-4 '. .0 RG 2543 • �! ' ,In �- 4 4 3 S4• R- q e.° +4 S-4 R-4 TR:►litil sk'in'u'�1.li: - � 1.4. 8- " R_ R- ! 8'11'8 17'57 ”... yiEL.it • 6400x779 3rher Yow .:.':7!. ,P.• 1`r R-4 ��1 +1Ljwilli x74 x �� i /aJ-K 8-2jih. r0 3 `;r ...n.,..,„1.♦1 •'.:'1' x68 "1N7 s4.. _alibi ,_ k 3462 .,. ;�a��„Ofide xx xsg,`',- ' 1 i ltr:.. 3t. 74. . xN x4 ...;:i _ " n d-3. ,^° N N N A� N �+ li x41 PF ,- ir��5 �„ N .. .._ e• 1 t ^'1 1531`?�r� ,' sw 5,33 9*-----7-F" ?"-.7 � Z.eii t-e•-./ MEMORANDUM • TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER \ DATE: December 13, 1991 SUBJECT: 1992 TIMELINE SUBMISSION DATES The attached calendar and resolution have been provided for your review. This item has been discussed previously by the Planning Commission at their November 20, 1991 Meeting. This item will need to be acted upon at the Wednesday Meeting. • • EXHIBIT 1 • 1992 January 1992 February 1992 March 1992 April 1992 S M T V, T F S SMTWTFS SMTWTFS SMTWTFS 1 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 ® 5 6 7 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 91011 2 3 4 0 6 7 8 8 910 12 13 14 5 6 7 910 11 121314161718 9 10 11 13 14 15 151617Qg19 021 1213140161718 19 20 21 22 23 4 25 16 17 18 U 20 21 22 22 23 24 25 26 28 19 20 21 22 23 +y� 25 26 27 28 29 30 i 23 24 25 26 27 S. 29 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 May 1992 June 1992 July 1992 August 1992 SMTWTFS SMTWTFS SMTWTFS SMTWTFS 1 2 1 2 ® 4 5 6 0 2 3 4 1 3 4 5 © 7 8 9 7 8 911 1213 5 6 7 9 10 11 2 3 4 ® 6 7 8 10 11 12 14 15 16 14 15 16 018 19 20 12 13 14 16 17 18 9 10 11 13 14 15 17 18 19 Qg 21 23 2 , 22 23 24 25 ® 27 19 20 21 22 23 2_4 25 16 17 1811120 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 V 30 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 ® 23 24 25 25 27 Ce 29 31 30 31 September 1992 October 1992 November 1992 December 1992 SMTWTFS S M T W T F ; SMTWTFS SMTWTFS ;ttE i{tt 1 0 3 4 5 1 2 3 1 2 3 ® 5 6 7 1 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 1011 12 4 5 6 0 8 910 8 910 12 13 14 6 7 8 1011 12 13 14 15 ,.Q 10 18 19 11 12 13 4 15 16 17 15 16 17 19 20 21 13 14 15 Q 17 1,...§ 19 20 21 22 23 24 ® 26 18 19 20 j 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 25 ® 28 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 ® 31 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 O REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING 0 APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR NEXT AGENDA SESSION • FIRST WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH IS A REGULAR MEETING. • THIRD WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH IS AN AGENDA SESSION. • PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WILL BE HELD AT 730 P.M. IN TEE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 326-91 III CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA ESTABLISHING MEETING AND TIMELINE SUBMISSION DATES FOR 1992 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission will be holding one regular business meeting per month during 1992 with the exception of Special Meetings; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has requested to review regular business meeting agenda items at their agenda • session, a minimum of two weeks prior to the regular business meeting; and WHEREAS, developers, citizens or other interested parties should be advised of deadlines for materials used by staff to prepare a report and used by the Planning Commissioners to decide on a particular development issue; and WHEREAS, a display of meeting dates and submission deadline dates be established to provide an orderly system for use by the Planning Commission, staff and general public; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Mounds View establishes meeting and submission timetable dates setting deadlines for submission of materials for agenda sessions of the Planning Commission and also setting the dates of the regular business meetings and agenda sessions; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Exhibit 1 becomes an integral part of this resolution; - sion is required to or desires to hold special meetings, they will do so in accordance with State law, Code requirements and the Bylaws. Adopted this 4th day of December, 1991. ATTEST: Chair (SEAL) o Planner MEMORANDUM • TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER DATE: December 13, 1991 SUBJECT: TOWNSEDGE TERRACE C.U.P. Staff is in the process of compiling a list of violations within Townsedge Terrace which will need to be addressed prior to the issuance of a conditional use permit. The Planning Commission will be informed of these violations on Wednesday evening. If you have any questions, give me a call. MEMORANDUM • TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER \ DATE: December 13, 1991 SUBJECT: GREENFIELD ESTATES DEVELOPMENT, HARSTAD COMPANIES Following the November 20, 1991 Planning Commission meeting, the Harstad request was submitted to Barr Engineering for their review. At present, Barr has completed their preliminary review of the proposal and their comments have been provided to the City. A copy of those comments have been included for your information. McCombs, Frank, Roos Associates (representatives of the applicant) have been forwarded a copy of the comments made by Barr and are currently addressing the concerns outlined. Representatives from both Barr and McCombs, Frank, Roos will be at the Wednesday Evening Meeting to comment on the proposal. • Because of the tremendous interest in a past development proposal on this same site, staff has sent notices to surrounding property owners for the Wednesday Meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to give me a call. • • Barr • Engineering Company 881011 8300 Norman Center Drive � 40 Minneapolis,MN 55437-1026 Phone: (612)832-2600 Fax: (612)835-0186 December 5, 1991 wDtt t v waiveda jarvaa Mr. Paul Harrington 415k Planner City of Mounds View �4eSZ,ZSI 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 • RE: Harstad Companies Subdivision Proposal Dear Mr. Harrington: At your request, Barr Engineering Co. has conducted a preliminary review of the application for a wetland alteration permit for the Harstad Companies Greenfield Estates project. The results from this review indicate that the application does not contain the documentation necessary to complete an evaluation of the proposed project's level of compliance with Mounds View's Wetland Zoning Ordinance. Additional documentation which should be requested • from the applicant is: • A wetland zoning district map showing the proposed wetland zoning district boundary line. • Computations regarding existing and proposed flood storage volumes. ■ Computations documenting the existing and proposed water quality enhancement value of the wetland. It is our recommendation that the applicant should use Walker Method P-8 for calculating the wetland's value for water quality enhancement. We also suggest that watershed • - - • . -e o. as.ne• rom either the phosphorus loading data contained in the Metropolitan Council document titled "Phosphorus Export in the Twin Cities Metro Area" (Joseph Mulchay) , or should be calculated using the NURP Method (EPA 44015-87-001) . ■ Computations specifying the wetland zoning district's existing and proposed wildlife habitat value. • Detailed descriptions of proposal impacts to vegetation, including documentation demonstrating that the aerial extent of disturbance is the minimum necessary. ■ Language supporting any representation regarding changes in wetland • flow characteristics and the fact that these changes will or will not have adverse impacts. Mr. Paul Harrington December 5, 1991 Page 2 41111 ■ Language demonstrating that the proposed size of development evelopment is the minimum necessary. ■ A construction schedule. • Soil loss computations for construction and post-construction conditions using the ordinance specified method. • A plan and design specifications for all sediment and erosion control measures. The results from the preliminary review also indicate that Lots 2 and 3 of Block 4 and Lot 2 of Block 3 are not in compliance with the minimum lot width and lot size standards. • If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call. Sncerely, Peter J. Sabee PJS:ymh • 23\62\156\PH.LTR • •