Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-19-1992 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 19, 1992 ` 1111 7:30 P.M. SPECIAL MEETING 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Citizens Requests and Comments from the Floor: CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 4. Consideration of Resolution No. 330-92 Regarding Conditional Use Permit and Major Subdivision Request of Saturn of St. Paul, 2375 Highway 10, Planning Case No. 335-91 • AGENDA SESSION 1. Review Minutes: February 5, 1992 (Enclosed) 2. Discussion of Conditional Use Permit (Oversized Garage) Request of Tom Edwards, 8315 Pleasant View Drive, Planning Case No. 340-92 3. Discussion of Conditional Use Permit (Oversized Garage) Request of Gregory Johnson, 2865 Highway 10, Planning Case No. 337-92 cussion o on.itional Use Permit (Dog Kennel) Request of Mary Niezgocki, 8261 Red Oak Drive, Planning Case No. 338-92 5. Discussion of Conditional Use Permit (Dog Kennel) Request of Lonnie Madison, 5200 Jeffery Drive, Planning Case No. 339-92 6. Discussion of Variance (Setback Requirement) Request of Herbst and Sons Construction Co., Inc., 2299 County Road H2, Planning Case No. 336-92 • **************************************************************** APPLICANTS: YOUR A F11NDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY CITY HALL AT 784-3055 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO AF1nND. THANK YOU. **************************************************************** 1(( C4 . MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION41c:!04!J00;i0 RESOLUTION NO. 330-92 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY SATURN OF ST. PAUL, 2375 HIGHWAY 10, PLANNING CASE NO. 335-91 WHEREAS, Saturn of St. Paul has requested City approval to operate an automobile sales dealership at 2375 Highway 10; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance allows automobile sales dealerships in a B-3 , Highway Commercial District; and WHEREAS, the development, as proposed, requires a conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: a) Site plan dated 11/91 411 b) Lighting plan dated 11/91 c) Landscape plan dated 11/91 d) Parking plan dated 11/91; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the proposal is in conformance with the requirements of the Municipal Code, specifically Chapter 40; and WHEREAS, the storm water controls for this site were originally approved as part of the Mounds View Business Park project and have been reviewed and are considered adequate by the City Engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. The ratio of new to used cars on the site shall be to at all times. 2 . Outside loudspeakers shall be utilized for paging purposes only. 3 . No attention getting devices such as pennants, banners, window painting, balloons, etc. shall be • permitted on the site. PLANNING COMMISSION . RESOLUTION NO. 330-92 PAGE TWO OF TWO 4 . Only the following minor repairs/maintenance activities will be allowed on site: a. b. c. d. 5. The hours of operation of the facility shall be 6. Any mechanized method of washing cars shall require a conditional use permit per Chapter 40. 18, Subdivision D(2) . 7. Any cars not intended for resale shall not remain on the site for a period of time exceeding hours. 8 . No outside merchandizing of accessories shall be allowed. 9. Test driving of vehicles from the site shall follow the route highlighted and described on the attached map dated . 10. Transport truck deliveries shall be limited to the following hours: BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 19th day of February, 1992 . ATTEST: Chairman (SEAL) Planner • LINARNIDED • PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting February 5,. 1992 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds View Planning Commission was 1. Call To Order called to order by Chair Mountin at 7:35 p.m. on Wednesday, February 5, 1992 . MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Burgers, 2 . Roll Call Colleen, Miller, Nelson, Peterson, Stevenson, and Chair Mountin. ALSO PRESENT: Planner Harrington, Recording Secretary Asleson, and Councilmember Blanchard. Planner Harrington stated that Gary 3. Approval of Jones had informed the City Council that Minutes: he did not wish to be reappointed for January 2, 1992 another term on the Planning Commission. • Because of this, the line indicating an unexcused absence for Commissioner Jones in the meeting minutes of January 2, 1992 should be stricken. Motion/Second: Stevenson/Nelson to approve the minutes of January 2, 1992 as amended. 7 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried James Paron, 2288 Highway 10, indicated 4 . Resident that he had concerns regarding the Requests and proposed parking lot at the property Comments from next to his home. His primary concern the Floor was that cars would trespass onto his adjacent property. Chair Mountin replied that this case was on the night's agenda and that his concerns would be addressed at that time. Planner Harrington outlined Planning 5. Consideration Case No. 330-91, development review of Resolution request of Wolf and Associates. John 328-92, Purves, representative of the applicant, Regarding informed staff earlier in the day that Development . he could not be present at the meeting. Review for Wolf and Associates UNAPPROVED Mounds View Planning Commission February 5, 1992 • Regular Meeting Page 2 When this case was discussed previously at Agenda Session, Staff was asked to investigate the issue of drainage at the site. Planner Harrington distributed a memo from City Engineer Ric Minetor, who did not recommend on-site water detention. Chair Mountin requested that the contents of the memo be incorporated into the Resolution. Motion/Second: Miller/Nelson to approve Resolution No. 328-92, as amended. 7 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Planner Harrington moved on to Planning 6 . Consideration Case 335-91, amendment to Planned Unit of Resolution Development at 2260/2280 Highway 10. He 329-92, noted that this case had been discussed regarding at the previous agenda session and that Planned Unit Tim Nelson was present to represent the Development • applicant, Everest Development. amendment for Everest Mr. Nelson prefaced his comments on this Development at case by asking the Commission if they Mounds View might also consider taking action on Business Park another Everest proposal not on the South agenda, namely the Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P. ) application for a Saturn Dealership at 2375 Highway 10. He indicated that Saturn was expressing concerns regarding timing and that they were willing to consider the C.U.P. and the Major Subdivision/Jackson Drive issues at separate times . Chair Mountin replied that she would poll the Commissioners on this request following action on the case at hand. Mr. Nelson reviewed plans to add land into the Mounds View Business Park South Planned Unit Development (P.U.D) to add a 190 stall parking lot. He stated that Everest had received a favorable opinion from the City Forester on the land- scaping, which would provide screening111 between the northwest corner of the 40 Mounds View Planning Commission February 5, 1992 Regular Meeting Page 3 parking lot and the adjacent property. Mr. Nelson then addressed Mr. Paron's concerns regarding trespassers on his property. There would be a five to six foot drop in grading with a retaining wall between the parking lot and Mr. Paron's property. Everest Development believes that this plan is preferable to an unsightly fence. Mr. Paron asked about drainage on the site; he was told by Mr. Nelson that the site was designed so that water would flow back onto the parking lot and not onto Mr. Paron's land. Chair Mountin asked Mr. Paron if he had any concerns regarding lighting. He replied that he did not, as he actually preferred that the site be well lit. • Commissioner Nelson asked Tim Nelson about the loss of oak trees on the site. Tim Nelson indicated that five to six trees in the right-of-way would be kept, but that unfortunately, the rest would be lost. Commissioner Peterson asked about the fate of the house at 2280 Woodale Drive. Mr. Nelson stated that it would be move off site and hopefully used elsewhere. Commissioner Peterson then relayed a concern from a resident regarding the possible increase in noise from Highway 10 in adjacent residential areas once the lot is cleared. Commissioner Nelson brought up the issue of truck traffic in the Mounds View Business Park South area. Tim Nelson affirmed that some trucks were missing the turn into the Business Park and were turning around in residential streets. Tim Nelson stated that Everest planned • to improve signage in the area to alleviate this problem. UNAPPROVED Mounds View Planning Commission February 5, 1992 • Regular Meeting Page 4 Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of prohibiting right turns from the proposed parking lot onto Woodale Drive to prevent an increase in residential traffic. Mr. Nelson stated that most people would probably turn onto Highway 10 anyway and that such a prohibition would just create a policing problem. However, he did leave open the possibility of putting in traffic restrictions in the future if residential traffic becomes a problem. Chair Mountin asked Mr. Paron if he felt comfortable with the grading plan as presented by Mr. Nelson. He indicated that he felt it would be satisfactory. Motion/Second: Stevenson/Colleen to approve Resolution 329-92, recommending Council approval of an amendment to the planned unit development at 2260/2280 Highway 10 . 7 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Chair Mountin asked Commission members 7 . Discussion to share their thoughts on the request regarding from Everest Development to discuss and Conditional Use act upon the application for a Permit Conditional Use Permit for a Saturn Application of Dealership at this meeting and to deal Everest with the Major Subdivision/Jackson Drive Development for issue at a later date. a Saturn Dealership at Planner Harrington clarified for the 2375 Highway 10 Commission that the C.U.P. and the Major Subdivision were two separate applications that just happened to be submitted at the same time and can be acted upon at different times. Commissioner Nelson stated that all comments that he heard at the informational session on Saturn concerned the Jackson Street extension; none were against the Saturn dealership itself. The Commissioners discussed several • UNAPPROVED • Mounds View Planning Commission February 5, 1992 Regular Meeting Page 5 possible scheduling scenarios that would send a recommendation regarding the Conditional Use Permit to the City Council, with the Major Subdivision request being discussed and acted upon at a later date. The Commission agreed to discuss the conditions for the C.U.P. at an agenda session following this regular meeting and to call to order at the February 19, 1992 Agenda Session to make a recommendation. They also agreed to ask the City Council to set a Public Hearing on the C.U.P. application for February 24, 1992, at which time the Commission's recommendation would be ready to be made known. Motion/Second: Nelson/Burgers to request that the City Council set a Public Hearing on the Conditional Use Permit application of Everest Development on February 24, 1992, with • action on the Major Subdivision request to occur at a later date. 7 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried There was no Staff Report. 8 . Staff Report The commissioners in attendance at the 9 . Report of Chair January 15, 1992 agenda session included Commissioners Burgers, Miller, Nelson, Peterson, Stevenson, and Chair Mountin. Commissioner Colleen had an excused - There being no further business before 10. Adjournment the Commission, Chair Mountin adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m Respectfully Submitted, 410 Paul Harrington City Planner MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNERt� DATE: February 12, 1992 SUBJECT: C.U.P. - OVERSIZED GARAGE TOM EDWARDS, 8315 PLEASANT VIEW DRIVE Tom Edwards, 8315 Pleasant View Drive, has made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a garage which exceeds the maximum allowable square footage(864 sq. ft. ) as specified in Chapter 40 . 10 Subdivision C ( 1) c, of the Mounds View municipal Code. Chapter 40 . 10 Subdivision D (6) allows for garages in excess of 864 square feet but not exceeding 1264 square feet. The applicants proposal would add 608 square feet to an existing 576 square foot garage for a total of 1, 184 square feet. The request meets all • other applicable requirements set forth in Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code including, but not limited to, height, area and setbacks . All materials submitted as part of the application have been included for your review. If you have any questions, please call. CITY OF MOUNDS-VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION DateaAJ o_o2,:/4/66 APPLICANT: Name fpm �DIuAfL{D5 6w)4,07I —00a0 Phone06783- 8-7 Ai Address 3i5 .. LEASArjT (EW fVE Interest' Property (Check Appropriate Blank) :Owner of Record Lessee, Operator Manager - Contractor for Deed Owner Agreement to Purchase - Other (Expl ain) Documentary evidence of applicant' s interest in the property may be required before final City action on this request . PROPERTY : Address/General Location 8315 ?LEA' Iii VIEW - (RIVE • LOT 4- l3cloc,JC i -R.ECGAI Vsew ESTATES Legal Owner: Name/Address AeouE Present Use (Check Appropriate Blank) : Undevel oped/Vacant Apartment !/Sinyl e Family Dwell iny Business Esabl ishment Dup.( ex Dwell iny Industrial Establ ishment El Multiple Dwell iny (3-6 units) Other (expl ain) 3 Property Cl assification: Abstract (Torren REQUEST: (Explain) /12 ON �Tib2AG.€ 6;AR4C.E giwz / If TO EX/57?n/G— AZ ' ae. 0 versi` ed i a YQge, Piz Suave s /lit N Dic.wwC s �J hereby declare that the above statements are true. (\ li1 signature FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: TOTAL BASE *(Base Fees are Non-Refundabl e) DEPOSIT FEES Subdivision , .Major $250 ($150) TOTAL FEES PAID ( p_'.�Q i Subdivision , Minor $100 ($75) Date Paid i—r.. -fas! Rezoniny $100 ($50) Receipt Number ;5_1 ;� , Y, Conditional Use $100 ($50) 46/00,00 -- Variance $75 ($5t) Code Appeal $100 ($50) Park Fund Dedication - Alteration Permit ' $150 ($50) Date Paid Plan Review $100 ($50) Receipt Number • Other ($50) PLANNING SIGN $ 50 Addt'l Fees Paid Date Paid Receipt Number 3Y° " 4a 21? s MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER DATE: February 12, 1992 SUBJECT: C.U.P. - OVERSIZED GARAGE GREG JOHNSON, 2865 HIGHWAY 10 Greg Johnson, 2865 Highway 10, has made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a garage which exceeds the maximum allowable square footage( 864 sq. ft. ) as specified in Chapter 40 . 10 Subdivision C ( 1) c, of the Mounds View municipal Code. Chapter 40 . 10 Subdivision D (6) allows for garages in excess of 864 square feet but not exceeding 1264 square feet. The proposal would allow the construction of a 32 ' x 39 ' ( 1,248 square feet) garage which would replace an existing 20 ' x 22 ' garage and 10' x 12 ' shed. The request meets all other applicable requirements set • forth in Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code including, but not limited to, height, area and setbacks . All materials submitted as part of the application have been included for your review. If you have any questions, please call. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION Date //7/7.R APPLICANT: Name (ly� I 37,trieit/ Phone 27/ -77/ 7 Address ..._._. A-;,,,,- . Interest in Property (Check 'Appropriate Blank) : VO-wner of Record Lessee, Operator, Manager P � Contractor for Deed Owner Agreement to Purchase Other (Expl ain) Documentary evidence of applicant' s interest in the property may be required before final City action on this request. PROPERTY : Address/General Location a&•S_ /l/, /(/d /144.c •dC-e-L/ 6Legal Owner: Named/Address , y or.r,� , 211-3.5---x/ / ...., - ,oiy [/�i�rsi flit/ T S-sT//p.. Present Use (Check Appropriate Blank) : Undevel oped/Vacant Apartment 2( Single Family Dwell my Business Esabl ishment Dupl ex Dwell i ng Industrial Estabi ishment • Mul ti l e Dwell i n P y (3-6 units) Other (expl am) Property Classification: Abstract Torrens ;EQUEST: (Expl ain) G --r .-�iy/ iynature) OR OFFICE USE ONLY: TOTAL BASE *(Base Fees are Non-Refundable) DEPOSIT FEES Subdivision , Major $250 ($150) TOTAL FEES PAID )00 . 00 Subdivision , Minor $100 ($75) Date Paid /,.../ -2-5,3_ Rezoning $100 ($50) Receipt Number .: 96/5?-t) Conditional Use $100 ($50) f©a.av Variance $75 ($50) Code Appeal $100 ($50) Park Fund Dedication - Alteration Permit $150 ($50) Date Paid Plan Review $100 ($50) Receipt Number11111 Other ($50) PLANNING SIGN $ 50 Addt1 Fees Paid Date Paid Receipt Number lLp 154. 8 - — • t- ku ?_� U) V_ 4 W W I- r d Q. a v \(---- , ....- . —. I ' CHAIN {.INK I - J FepcE I ll I I I I I 8e4a0 I 0 la • 1k I 4,1� g7 ']' • V k pla-t. ulE at. III" EX/StirJ • ' ' a—... ' SGALg N. 41 -i • 4. (2/•r• ss v� • • /Y 1 NNN 1 N I * \NN; o ;O01 ,Tc 0 .sem C� ;" • . i,� 4.-----'17& 4� d.iz s<Ns s,-...._..,r 152. 8 ' r C--- . • d • r' J Iu �, LO I CJ 4 w H h s A -009 (4 . , . CZ • 4 ' CHAIN UNK • • peNtE <II N U t4.j 1 1 • o BOARD reutES I t _ .. .- 57,4 ' , �11� N > �a`5 repos - 110 Q • .0° yam' � /0 N,6-) . . . . . . - • • . . 1 -. - • .. •.. . . i.....„ .. . IN N . . .\ ,. ..... I - o ,O, c ' 6-/ . -‘,.., . • . . . . ( -/cc c 0.3.' • v 1 S L(l/t3LXYL w 111 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER DATE: February 12, 1992 SUBJECT: C.U.P. - RESIDENTIAL DOG KENNEL MARY NIEZGOCKI, 8261 RED OAK DRIVE Mary Niezgocki has made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the establishment of a residential dog kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive. Chapter 40 . 10 Subdivision D(4) of the Mounds View Municipal Code allows for dog/cat kennels of no more than four(4) animals in residential zone districts with a conditional use permit; The applicants property is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. . The application indicates that four(4) dogs will be kept on the site. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me. • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION Date l- aa -9a • APPLICANT: NameMARV V. Nlco ( Phone me_ )(o- 3 05 Address -� - Interest in Property (Check Appropriate Blank) : X Owner of Record . • Lessee, Operator, Manager Contractor for Deed Owner - Agreement to Purchase Other (Expl ain) Documentary evidence of appl icant' s interest in the property may be required before final City action on this request. PROPERTY: Address/General Location (Df £r npK --irc Legal Owner: Name/Address -1-\-ftR•-/ o/ ( pKy 1\11ZGaCl4-! g.ZCc / j?F. (`)fit K_ .2 Present Use (Check Appropriate Blank) : Undevel oped/Vacant Apartment X Sinyl e Family Dwell ing Business Esabl ishment • Duplex Dwell my Industrial Establ ishment Multiple Dwelling (3-6 units) Other (expl ain) Property Classification: Abstract Torrens ;EQUEST: (Expl ain) CO D ;, cAi- LJS ER , •r-- - i NWS s5i .6 iAL --ee/Qo•.s F L -4/ '- T - • - - s are rue. czta_------"( i . (sign-tu 41 r OR OFFICE USE ONLY: TOTAL BASE *(Base Fees are Non-Refundabl e) DEPOSIT FEES Subdivision , Major $250 ($150) TOTAL FEES PAID 4./Coco Subdivision , Minor $100 ($75) Date Paid / -aa-9a Rezoniny $100 ($50) Receipt Number 37 3-0 V Conditional Use $100 ($50) X00 - o c Variance $75 ($50) Code Appeal $100 ($50) Par and Des • ation \ = Al teration Permit $150 ($50) Dat- Pa. ' ' /AWM- X41f/e,; Plan Review $100 ($50) Receipt Num.-r 7 . -07 - Other ($50) PLANNING SIGN $ 50 Addt'l Fees Paid • Date Paid_ 338 - ?.Z- Receipt Number au,ryu MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER 0.-\‘ DATE: February 12, 1992 SUBJECT: C.U.P. - RESIDENTIAL DOG KENNEL LONNIE MADISON, 5200 JEFFERY DRIVE Lonnie Madison has made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the establishment of a residential dog kennel at 5200 Jeffery Drive. Chapter 40 . 10 Subdivision D(4) of the Mounds View Municipal Code allows for dog/cat kennels of no more than four(4) animals in residential zone districts with a conditional use permit; The applicants property is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. . The application indicates that four(4) dogs will be kept on the site. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me. . - III CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW • -: PLANNING APPLICATION Date /--? 7,..9,9_ APPLICANT: Nameto rev► le ,k, A`-t-a�►Son Phone -6f9. 5 '- Address1$ QQ J cPet-y _Vr . _ • n � � • HoiS Interest in Property (Check Appropriate Blank) : Owner of Record Lessee, Operator, Manager Contractor for Deed Owner Agreement. to Purchase K Other (Exp.' ain) » cr i,,,,. . Documentary evidence of applicant' s interest in the property may be required before final City action on this request. PROPERTY : Address/General Location Saoo a„ a 1 li::-_)-6-• Legal Owner: Name/Address ,. r`/ tyla,-- MC( A`-5.eryl Present Use (Check Appropriate Blank) : Undevel oped/Vacant Apartment 2. Single Family Dwell ing Business Esabl ishment • Duplex Dwell my Industrial Establ ishment Multiple Dwell in (3-6 units) Other (expl ain) Property Classification: Abstract Torrens ;EQUEST: (Expl ain) 4i,p ,( pier. • — -e.2-'S • ere•y •ec are a t e above statements are true. _ (signature) • OR OFFICE USE ONLY: TOTAL BASE *(Base Fees are Non-Refundable) DEPOSIT FEES Subdivision , Major $250 ($150) TOTAL FEES PAID Jo o • oa Subdivision , Minor $100 ($75) Date Paid, i- a7 -9„1__ Rezoning $100 ($50) Receipt Number 3 -) 5-3_3 Conditional Use $100 ($50) foo. a o . Variance $75 ($50) • Code Appeal $100 ($50) Park Fund Dedication Alteration Permit $150 ($50) Date Paid0 Plan Review $100 ($50) Receipt Number. Other ($50) PLANNING SIGN $ 50 Addt'l Fees Paid Date Paid 7/ g Receipt Number 33 9 -9 dkivrLAD MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER ?A DATE: February 13, 1992 SUBJECT: VARIANCE - SIDEYARD SETBACK HERBST & SON'S, 2299 COUNTY ROAD H Russell Herbst, representing Herbst & Son's, has made application for a variance to allow the construction of a 60 ' x 68 ' addition to their existing facility at 2299 County Road H. The variance requested would allow the addition to be located at a five(5) foot sideyard setback where a 20 foot setback is required by Municipal Code(Chapter 40 . 05 Subdivision C; I-1, Industrial) . Currently, an 80 ' x 140' building is located on the site at a 5 ' sideyard setback. The proposal would allow the addition to continue the building line(5 ' setback) of the existing facility. • In May of 1986, the Mounds View Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 161-86 which recommended approval of a subdivision of the property now known as 2299 County Road H. Reference was made in this resolution to the existence of a 5 ' sideyard setback. At that time it was determined that the setback was not the result of actions of the property owner. All materials received as part of the application have been included for your review. In addition, I have included a copy of Planning Commission Resolution No. 161-86 which was earlier referenced. If you have any questions relative to this case, please feel free to give me a call. • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION Date _ - 1 15 92 . APPLICANT: Name HERBST & SONS CONST. CO. , INC. Phone 784-8510 Address • 2299 Co. Rd. H. New Brighton, Mn. 55112 • Interest in Property (Check Appropriate Blank) : - Owner of Record Lessee, Operator, Manager Contractor for Deed Owner Agreement to Purchase . Other (Explain) Documentary evidence of applicant' s interest in the property may be required before final City action on this request. PROPERTY:. Address/General Location 229Q rn ' Rd H MPw Rrighntn Mn ' 55112 Legal Owner Name/Address HFRRST & snms rnNST rn TNc 2299 Co. Rd. H. NPw Brighton, Mn_ 55112 • ' • Present Use (Check Appropriate Blank) : - • Undeveloped/Vacant Apartment Single a Family Dwell in9 Business Esabl ishment • Duplex Dwelling x Industrial Establishment . Multiple Dwell ing (3-b units) Other (explain) Property Classification: Abstract Torrens .EQUEST: (Explain) It would not be feasible by seting building 20 ft. offset of property line, it would serve no purpose for our exsisting operation with exsisting stationary equipment inside of building which can not be relocated. At , .. Ati 1 _ . i. - �a��- .�� s•��-y (signature) • • DR OFFICE USE ONLY: - TOTAL BASE *(Base Fees are Non-Refundable) • DEPOSIT FEES Subdivision , Major $250 ($150) TOTAL FEES PAID 75—co Subdivision , Minor $100 ($75) . Date Paid /— Rezoning $100 ($50) . Receipt Number R-7 ‘47-7 Conditional Use $100 ($50) • Variance $75 ($50) '2.5" o0 Code Appeal $100 ($50) Park Fund Dedication Alteration Permit $150 ($50) Date Paid Plan Review $100 ($50) Receipt Number. • Other ($50) . PLANNING SIGN $ 50 Addt'1 Fees Paid . Date Paid ' 33 Co - 9sq, Receipt Number -2/ S' MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 161-86 ( • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE 168-85, HERBST AND SONS DEMOLITION COMPANY WHEREAS, Herbst and Sons Demolition Company has requested City approval for a major subdivision ( 1 lot into 3 lots ) , rezoning and variance; and WHEREAS , the Planning Commission has reviewed the staff report and reviewed information submitted by the applicant; and WHEREAS , the Planning Commission has also reviewed the proposal and it is in conformance with all Chapters of the Municipal Code, specifically Chapters 40 , 42 , 49, and 49A and State Statutes; and WHEREAS , the existing building is 5 feet from the property line, and the City Code requires a 20 foot setback from side yard lot lines and this is a pre-existing condition not caused by the • property owners; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends rezoning the property, occupied by Herbst and Sons after the subdivision, from B-3 to I-1; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends that the property now occupied by Pettibone Corporation be rezoned from B-3 to I-1 at the same time; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission grants a variance of 15 feet on the side yard setback requirement; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends revising the Comprehensive Plan for the Herbst and Pettibone properties; BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission direct staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adoped this 7th day of May, 1986 ATTEST: / ;, Chai man (SEAL,; d • Director of Public Works/ Community Development I . . I , [ * .. - ...•4i2,,!• - l• • .:: -• . - - ,...._„? x.I I.. --_ , I :. -- - - , . II . _ ..., /.._______,L ....,-,r -_090 Airip01 . ' . 5 1 i • .. . .• , .0 1, / _ . , . • ...: .. .._ ._ . A RIM 80.2- • - • •- ** -- Z)- ----:lIN V. 74.8 • . . .,.... . . ..J,..„..._ Lf3' i:-,til-.4friF. - 1.3 - - / -- - 1 e — I l / 14)-a 7 5 1 . 6 . 0 . ..- -. • , rn cb q:-.. ..___ dr An / } / ego SII"Cise \ ?A eiii• pg.....f...eilk.... ., R A 1NAGE EASEMENT -::- INV. 73..2 -\‘ _ _57 ____ \ DITCH 7 b - • • . • . 5), 1 A? --:---- --7 4' 4nnq la CC.4 - 119. ReCeiVed DI co co VOZ4Yleit 4' • do ..9 Ji.r. • -., :::.. . :.,.,- • " . . . . • • - • • " •- .. •---___- •• -•