Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-15-1992 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 15, 1992 7:30 P.M. AGENDA SESSION 1. Review Minutes: March 18, 1992 (Enclosed) April 1, 1992 (Enclosed) 2. Discussion of Conditional Use Permit (Flood Zone District) Request of Steve Borden, 3009 County Road H, Planning Case No. 342-92 3. Discussion of Variance (Front Yard Setback) Request of George Wagar, 7660 Woodlawn Drive, Planning Case No. 346-92 4. Discussion of Minor Subdivision Request of Arnold Scholljegerdes, 8298 Knoliwood Drive, Planning Case No. 345-92 5. Continued Discussion of Conditional Use Permit (Pet Grooming) Request of Twin City School of Pet Grooming, 2840 Highway 10, Planning Case No. 343-92 6. Discussion of Major Subdivision Request, Long Lake Woods 7. Continued Discussion of Development Request of Harstad Companies, Planning Case No. 333-91 **************************************************************** REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY CITY HALL AT 784-3055 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO A 1'PEND. THANK YOU. **************************************************************** UNAPPROVED 111 PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Meeting March 18, 1992 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds View Planning Commission was 1. Call To Order called to order by Chair Mountin at 8:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 18, 1992 . MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Miller, 2. Roll Call Nelson, Peterson, Ruggles, Stevenson, and Chair Mountin. Commissioner Burgers had an excused absence. Commissioner Colleen had an unexcused absence. ALSO PRESENT: Planner Harrington and 0 Recording Secretary Asleson. Chair Mountin welcomed new Commissioner Hank Ruggles to the Planning Commission. There were no resident requests or 3. Resident comments from the floor. Requests and Comments from the Floor Planner Harrington briefly reviewed 4. Consideration Planning Case No. 336-92, Herbst and of Resolution Sons ' application or a i een oo , variance from the side yard setback Variance requirement. He stated that this case Request of was before the Commission at this Herbst and meeting because there were not enough Sons, 2299 Commissioners present at the last County Road H regular meeting to have the quorum necessary to act on the item. Chair Mountin noted that Mr. Herbst was present and that this case had been previously reviewed at an agenda session. She asked the Commissioners 0 for their opinions on the case. ` ;Li; •. Mounds View Planning Commission March 18, 1992 S Special Meeting Page 2 Commissioner Peterson felt that there was no other property like this one in the City and that granting this variance would not confer special privileges on this applicant that are not enjoyed by other owners in the City. Commissioner Miller stated that the hardship in this case appears to be an economic hardship. Commissioner Nelson said that since the 1986 Planning Commission granted a variance based on the fact that the applicant did not create the situation, he would be in favor of granting this variance. Commissioner Stevenson felt that, if the variance went through, the proposed addition would look better aesthetically than if Mr. Herbst built in another part • of the property. Commissioner Ruggles felt that a hardship existed for the applicant in that it would be difficult to configure the building in a way that would meet setback requirements . Motion/Second: Stevenson/Peterson to approve Resolution No. 333-92, approving a fifteen foot variance from side yard setback requirements, Herbst and Sons, 2299 County Road H. 4 ayes 2 nays Motion Carried Commissioner Miller voted against granting the variance because she felt that the applicant had not met all of the criteria with regard to hardship. Chair Mountin voted against granting the variance because she didn't feel that the variance implied in the 1986 Resolution should be automatically 111 conferred to this new case. In 1 AFTITITED Mounds View Planning Commission March 18, 1992 Special Meeting Page 3 addition, Chair Mountin stated that she felt that the applicant had only proven "practical difficulty' rather than "undue hardship" , which is required in order to grant a variance. It was requested that Staff include a copy of the Minnesota Land Planning Act, which outlines the requirements for variances, in the next packet. Planner Harrington stated that the 5. Consideration applicant, Everest Development, had just of Resolution brought in copies of a new proposal for No. 334-92, the subdivision at 2375 Highway 10. Tim Major Sub- Nelson, representing Everest, said that division he felt comfortable with simply request of presenting the new information at the Everest agenda session following this Special Development, Meeting and having the Commission act on 2375 Highway 10 the Resolution at their Regular Meeting 0 on April 1. Motion/Second: Nelson/Stevenson to table Resolution 334-92, Subdivision Request of Everest Development for the property at 2375 Highway 10. 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried There being no further business before 6 . Adjournment the Commission, Chair Mountin adjourned the meeting at 8:11 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Paul Harrington City Planner • UNAPPROVED PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting April 1, 1992 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds View Planning Commission was 1. Call To Order called to order by Chair Mountin at 7 :39 p.m. on Wednesday, April 1, 1992 . MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Nelson, 2 . Roll Call Peterson, Ruggles, Stevenson, and Chair Mountin. Commissioners Burgers, Colleen, and Miller had excused absences. ALSO PRESENT: Planner Harrington and Recording Secretary Asleson. • Motion/Second: Nelson/Peterson to 3 . Approval of approve the minutes of February 19 and Minutes: March 4, 1992. February 19 and March 4, 1992 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried There were no resident requests or 4. Resident comments from the floor. Requests and Comments from the Floor Planner Harrington outlined Planning 5 . Consideration Case No. 335-91, request of Everest of Resolution Development for a Major Subdivision at No. 334-92 2375 Highway 10 . He indicated that Regarding Major Resolution No. 334-92 had been drafted Subdivsion per Commission directed at their March Request of 18, 1992 Agenda Session. Tim Nelson, Everest representing Everest Development, Development at indicated that he was willing to answer 2375 Highway 10 any questions of the Commission. Chair Mountin noted for the minutes that she would have preferred to dedication of right-of-way rather than the creation • of an outlot, because the City has more control in a right-of-way situation. UNAPPROVED Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1992 • Regular Meeting Page 2 Motion/Second: Stevenson/Nelson to adopt Resolution No. 334-92, recommending approval of a major subdivsion for Everest Development at 2375 Highway 10. 5 ayes 0 nay Motion Carried Planner Harrington updated the Comm- 6 . Consideration ission on the progress made on plans for of Resolution parking at the proposed Twin City School No. 335-92, of Pet Grooming, 2840 Highway 10. The Regarding City Attorney had been contacted regard- Conditional Use ing the number of spaces needed and he Permit for Pet determined that since the school would Grooming be a new use for the building, it would Facility, Twin need to provide for 18 parking spaces, City School of the number required by the current code. Pet Grooming, 2840 Highway 10 The applicant, Mary Bourke, showed the Commission with a parking plan that she felt would provide the required spaces . • Planner Harrington noted that some of the spaces that shown wouldn't be acceptable to the Fire Department. Because the building is not set up with a sprinkler system, Fire Code requires that 24 feet of the outside of the park- ing lot be kept clear for fire vehicles . The Commission then discussed several possible solutions to the applicant's dilemma, but none would meet all cond- itions of the present code. Chair Mountin commented that the parking area available is really too small for the amount of parking needed and that the property owner may have to acquire or use property from adjoining lots in order to get enough parking space for the building. She also stated that when the use changes on a building, the city must bring the property up to code. Ms. Bourke stated that she didn't see • why she would need 18 parking spots, as • UNAPPROVED Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1992 Regular Meeting Page 3 most of her customers don't park for all that long; they drop off their pets in the morning and pick them up at night. Chair Mountin again stated that when a use changes, the city must use current code standards. She also stated that with the grooming staff and nine to ten students parking each day, there would not be much room left for any cars. The Commissioners expressed their desire for the business to stay in the city, and made suggestions about other proper- ties that the applicant might rent. Chair Mountin asked the applicant how much time she had to make a decision regarding this property. The applicant indicated that she would like to speak • with the property owner to see if a solution can be found to the parking problem before looking elsewhere. Motion/Second: Stevenson/Peterson to table Resolution No. 335-92, with the option of calling to order at the Agenda Session April 15, 1992 to take action on the matter. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Planner Harring on ou ine• e nex case, Planning Case No. 334-92, variance of Resolution request of Mac-May Homes. The applicant No. 336-92, is asking to construct a home at 2673 Regarding Var- Sherwood Road with a side yard setback iance Request of five feet where a ten foot setback is of Mac-May required and with a front yard setback Homes at 2673 of 30 .5 feet where a setback of 58 feet Sherwood Road is required. When the lot was sub- divided and platted in 1986, the City Council required that the home have a 58 foot front setback to keep the home in line with the three homes to the east. In 1991, the Planning Commission denied • a variance request similar to this one, but the City Council overturned that VEUNAPPRO D Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1992 • Regular Meeting Page 4 ruling on appeal. However, the devel- ' oper never built the house and now needs a new variance. Steven May, representing the applicant, showed the Commission pictures of the proposed house. He explained that the building would meet setback requirements for the garage, since garages can be five feet from the lot line, but that he would need variances for the front and side yard requirements in order to build on the lot. Chair Mountin asked Mr. May to explain his hardship, as in order to process a variance, the applicant must prove, among other things, that there would be "undue hardship" if asked to adhere to current building requirements . Mr. May stated that there is a 25 foot • drainage easement on the eastern edge of the property, making the buildable part of the lot only 40 feet wide. Mr. May stated that he has built many houses in this area and cannot remember being able to build a house on such a narrow lot. Commissioner Peterson felt that, unfor- tunately, this lot was probably over- looked when it was platted. However, the owner did accept the way that the property was platted and should have to build within the requirements stated at the time of platting. Mr. May stated that he has purchased the property, although Charles Cook is still the fee owner. Charles Cook was the person who accepted the platting, not Mac-May Homes. Mr. May said again that, if he built within current building requirements, no one would buy the home because it would be so small. Planner Harrington clarified that one of 111the reasons that the Planning Commission UNAPPFIOVED • Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1992 Regular Meeting Page 5 denied this variance request in 1991 was because Mr. Cook had accepted the plat with the attached building restrictions. Chair Mountin stated that she felt that the easement was a practical difficulty, but that there was no undue hardship on the applicant, because the house design could be changed to work within setback requirements. Commissioner Stevenson asked why the house couldn't be built at a 58 foot setback. Mr. May replied that he wanted to keep the house in line with most other homes in Mounds View. Planner Harrington clarified that the • house could be built with a 58 foot front setback. The current design could not be built without a side yard variance, however. General discussion ensued regarding the possibility of vacating some of the easement so as to build the house further to the east, making the side variance unnecessary. Planner Harrington indicated that he could consult with the City Engineer on this, but that it probably would not be feasible, as there is a major storm water detention area nearby. Commissioner Ruggles asked the applicant if he would build on the lot if he had to adhere to a 58 foot setback. Mr. May stated that while the house would still fit on the lot, it would not be an ideal situation. He then asked if hardship must be proven in order to get a variance. • Chair Mountin explained that the Planning Commission must see evidence of UNAPPRO VIED • Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1992 111 Regular Meeting Page 6 hardship in order to grant a variance, ' but the City Council can grant one without it. Commissioner Peterson informed the Commission that Jerry Ruhland, 8121 Red Oak Court, had contacted him regarding this matter. Mr. Ruhland, who lives at 8121 Red Oak Court (which adjoins the subject property to the west) told Commissioner Peterson that he is "adamantly opposed to living quarters five feet from (my) property line. (I) moved to Mounds View, in part, because the houses are not so close together. " Planner Harrington also indicated that Mr. Ruhland had called City Hall and voiced the same opinion. The applicant stated that because he is on a building schedule, he would like the Commission to rule on the case and • if voted against, he would have time to appeal to the City Council. If the Council denied the variance, he would then pursue the issue of easement vacation. Motion/Second: Mountin/Stevenson to deny the variance request of Mac-May Homes for a five foot side yard variance and a 27 .5 foot front yard variance at 2673 Sherwood Road. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Chair Mountin noted for the minutes that she feels that the selection of house design is what is driving the need for this variance, rather than a hardship. The house could be made to fit the property rather than making the property fit the house. Planner Harrington informed the 8. Staff Report Commission that a new house was being built at 8206 Groveland Road and that the owners will be living in the old , UNAPPRO))11) • Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1992 Regular Meeting Page 7 house until the new one is completed. In addition, he noted that minor mod- ifications were being made to the parking plan at the new Saturn facility, due to a Council request for more parking. These items were told to the Commission as a matter of advisement. Planner Harrington also showed the Commission that he had received a letter from Jeff Roos, representative for Harstad Companies, regarding their development request application. In the letter, Mr. Roos stated that Mr. Harstad had decided to proceed with the app- lication as presented and wished to have Planning Commission comment made at their next regular meeting. General discussion ensued among the Commiss- ioners regarding outstanding issues on the case on proposed timetables for • action on the case. The attendance at the March 18, 1992 9 . Report of Chair Agenda Session included Commissioners Colleen, Miller, Nelson, Peterson, Ruggles, Stevenson, and Chair Mountin. Commissioner Burgers had an excused absence. There being no further business before 10 . Adjournment the Commission, Chair Mountin adjourned the meetin. at 9 :23 . .m. Respectfully Submitted, Paul Harrington City Planner • MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION . FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON,PLANNER Q0 DATE: April 9, 1992 SUBJECT: C.U.P. - FLOOD ZONE DISTRICT STEVE BORDEN, 3009 COUNTY ROAD H PLANNING CASE NO. 342-92 Steve Borden, 3009 County Road H, has made application to allow the construction of a 24'-0" x 24'-0" garage on the aforementioned property. The applicants property is currently located within the Flood Plain Zone. Chapter 49 . 04 Subdivision 2 (a) allows for the construction of accessory structures within the Flood Plain Zone with the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. The applicant will be submitting plans for the proposed structure which will be reviewed prior to • the Wednesday meeting. Comments on the conformance of those plans with the requirements set forth in Chapter 49 will be provided at the meeting. I have included the materials already received as part of this application for your review. If you have any questions, please call. (w-) s7a- les'oZ1 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION Date - 72 • APPLICANT: Name Gf�,„ e,,i / ,' v1 Phone l`7T'9--/393 AddressC? ? Gc-)un tv id /1 ilvcrncS v 2 c vv 19.1 6 .--112.- Interest .-”/1ZInterest in Property (Check Appropriate Blank) : X Owner of Record Lessee, Operator, Manager — Contractor for Deed Owner Agreement to Purchase Other (Expi ain) Documentary evidence of applicant' s interest in the property may be required before final City action on this request. PROPERTY : Address/General Location 3009 Cou.1 fy Pe/ II-- heti �i:.,,c"r 144n SS/I2 Lcit P'S) ex C /)*- we.S/ 2S fico V)ell-ea t, ilcno/1 tivaeri pcirK Legal Owner: Name/Address,. /'eye,., /, ct S%e%/q, l3c�fckri ,?eat- .7 �ilOA / /IC/ /LT, 110Urie-A ✓�, ii- yil 0 6--c---,/,,„Present Use (Check/ Appropriate Blank) : Undevel oped/Vacant Apartment X Single Family Dwell ing Business Esabl ishment • Duplex Dwell my Industrial Establ ishment - Multiple Dwell my (3-6 units) - Other (expl ain) — Property Classification: Abstract Torrens REQUEST: (Expl ain) 8 ;/, „ r di r 4 - - o ,C7 s h ,'Z1471 r i v e IA/CI y /'c r n H AP, cwt" /7- pre S e c,t'' dp,ve. wcv I hereby declare that the above statements are true. cS2 Z signature) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: TOTAL BASE *(Base Fees are Non-Refundabl e) DEPOSIT FEES Subdivision , Major $250 ($150) TOTAL FEES PAID 611, )so. Subdivision, Minor $100 ($75) Date Paid a - 4 -q a Rezoning $100 ($50) Receipt Number 37s41,5— Conditional 7s4Conditional Use $100 ($50) Variance $75 ($50) Code Appeal $100 ($50) Park Fund Dedication • Alteration Permit $150 ($50) 1 70'w Date Paid • P1 an Review $100 ($50) Receipt Number Other ($50) PLANNING SIGN $ 50 Addt'l Fees Paid Date Paid Receipt Number 7a I I 74b1 7462 7454 7458 •;11-, o 7444 7447 . 7448 7445 7452 74571 N � � �7401 7442 4Y5 7430 7435 .7434 7415 OG� ^ DR 337 7— ,µr 0 PARK �c N Y Is 7405 7412 0 7409 7408 7390 3111g N ,333 7415 7406 7405 7386 (� 7400 7380 7381 7382 7395 7390 738• ®®®� n 7378 I I N ^ N ll! 7350 to 7365 7360 7375 N. 7365 7350 7374-BUN 411 _� N c.m i.-. 7340 7347 7340 7373 736 7370' tail N N 7320 7344 [[.�!! a 7338- w�o7 CT( o CO a 733 n m ^ 0 0 7305 * n n ^ O ® 301 PI N N o 0. 0 0 0 0 n N 01 at mm mm m N 731Q 1. O O 0 0 0 0 N N N N N NN N N N • RD H2 f n I M n n n n CO N .. m 0 r'NOa0m� V f m m N w n N mmm Ill ON § m 51. N w rn a m 7288 '295 IQ N N N N 5278 5279 5278 mmmcow NNN NNN , S M On R N N N N N N N N N N N 5273 5272 I 5272 v a v n N N F IIIM 5266 5267 5266 N I 2.11 “,?,11,c.: l N I N N I N 7280 5260 5261 LOUIS 0_5178 5177 O n 1• 'M n Wi N r 0 5254 5255< m m m m m m '°7234 7232; 5249 0) m N N °° m e5176 5175 w 5248 O v ' z. n N 722.6 7225 72� 5243 N N N N N N N N 5174 5t73P 5242 CLEARVIEW ITC 7200 7215 7190 5237 8 1 . A n p N N u 5172 5171 5236 23 Le.:, 7188 7191 5230 5231 N n n 74 n 7172 7180 w 5170 5169 5224 5225 22 N N N I N N N N 7151 7150 0 5168 5167 5218 5221 _ F ^ oo g I nt N \ m m:girt"m N I m O 5166 5165 ` 7 5212 5213 5213 521 _ 7111 N N N N N 0 5212La. I N o n WOODALE N DR Q 51645163 5206,5211 5206 5207 Q 52 �2C n _ m o N a I,Nj NI. m CO '� 5762 5161 5200 5205 5200 5201 -I 5200 5201 Z 52L 0 o m 7090 ♦ m oo N N N I N 7100 0 7095 N N N N WOODALE DR 5148 5201 5148 5149 5148 5149 J 51 $Z — 5149 Y m �i n 0 7 ` 7070 1 514 5140 5140 5141 5140 5141 514 I7092 n ,� 7030 3 707b . 5141 5133 5132 5133 57: • 7062 0 5139 5132 5133 5132 _ 7095 7074 Z 0 w 5125 5124 5125 57 Y 7063 0 5733 5124 5125 0 5124 7072 7069 7060 n N ^ o N 5116 5117 51" 7054 7057 7039 N m aD 0 5124 Y 5116 5117 5116 5117 _ 7044 .NN/ M WOODCREST 5179 O z5109 7034 3 WOODCREST �, j 0 5708 5109 5108 5109 5108 57 PARK 5713 w S 7041 7028 co 0 v. N 5107 5100 5101 N 5100 5101 5100 5101 51 7026 7025 . 1" M H ♦CO CO oo , WOODCREST 7006 7011 N N 7000 K — H H 04 5092 5092 5097 5092 5091 5092 5091 Sc 5(X72 5091 5 c 0 5085 0 5086 5085 5086 50657 5086 5085 .5088 5085 Sc 6986 2940 I m 5086 6991 N N6960 5080 5085 5090 5079 Z 5080 5079 SC 6970 Z 6975 2932 SP; ,,, , 5080 5079 5080 5x075 O 5071 3 5C 5072 5071 5072 5071 5072 8071 5072 5077 7-5072 Q 6953 N (IDN telt N 6950 6951 5066 5065 5066 5065 5066 5065 0 5< 6952 6940 5066 5065 w 5066 5065 5081 0 Z J N 6946 6945 0 5060 5059 5060 5057 5060 5059 m 5060 5059 a 5 8942 a _ -- 5060 5059 i, _ 5053 5063 s+ .926 4` m 5---„ O O 5054 5053 O 5054 5053 5054 5047 5054 5054 6928 m O1 1 -048 '' J ' ,. rr'.�i �i- . 5045 5046 5045 5 •. N N N m (�l fel H 3049 6900 3025 --T--' eo rCU al • MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION - , FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER p,0 DATE: April 9, 1992 SUBJECT: VARIANCE - 7660 WOODLAWN DRIVE GEORGE WAGAR, PLANNING CASE NO. Mr. George Wagar has made application to allow the placement of a City required garbage dumpster enclosure at a 6 foot front yard setback where a 30 foot setback is required by municipal code. On July 8 , 1991, the Mounds View City Council adopted Ordinance No. 492 which required that all garbage dumpsters used in conjunction with multiple dwellings and commercial establishments be contained within an enclosure that met City approved design standards. Included in the design standards established by the City Council was a front yard setback of 30 feet. • A portion of the applicants property is located within a wetland zone district which limits the areas on the lot where the enclosure can be erected. I have included all materials received as part of this application for your review. If you have any additional questions, please call. t CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION Date 1- -9L . APPLICANT: Name 6e0fe Co E' tee;aaAi ,� Phone Address a/ '9 P„rP Gefooc 04. Interest in Property (Check Appropriate Blank) : ✓Owner of Record Lessee, Operator, Manager - Contractor for Deed Owner Agreement to Purchase - Other (Expl ain) Documentary evidence of applicant' s interest in the property may be required before final City action on this request. PROPERTY : Address/General Location '7G 6c t ,oJ/it4vl/ ,Z . Legal Owner: Name/Address S AM e Present Use (Check Appropriate Blank) : Undevel oped/Vacant Apartment Si nyl e Family Dwell iny Business Esabl ishment • Dupl ex Dwell iny Industrial Establ ishment ✓Multiple Dwell iny (3-6 units) Other (expl ain) Property Classification: //�� Abstract // Torrens REQUEST: (Expl ain) �/1�;¢,1/ee /4/ A-11, '( 1iYc/mseyri2e I hereby declare that the above statements are true. 6 GT/ �� 'ynature) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: TOTAL BASE *(Base Fees are Non-Refundabl e) DEPOSIT FEES Subdivision , Mayor $250 ($150) TOTAL FEES PAID Subdivision , Minor 0 ($75) Date Paid :Cr !nai $75 ($5 Code Appeal $100 ($50) Park Fund Dedication Alteration Permit $150 ($50) Date Paid • \\\ Plan Review $100 ($50) Receipt Number Other ($50) PLANNING SIGN $ 50 Addt'l Fees Paid Date Paid 3/{Co-4a- `-' Receipt Number a- mot - • P.r i I .....‹. ..1 i" • , At I' . . I 1 Ai t•LS .• I . •--a il • .% . lr k! i I l''''...**\,....... .....i.....".. -..Z if s-- (n . , (-1 (.4 A ..t. - 1 - _ --.....1 . ..... c•cf.i.g 4 ------- - ----- , \\•... • 1 _ ....... ._. •,_ ... _ .... . . • ... .d. , 1 ..i - .--3 ••••:„. : • Qi `..9 \....9 0 I/ 0 cZ. \.... li \r) / \..) • . ...: . ' il •' ' 11 1 k ) 0..---_.--4-- '...-.' -...... .. ,• i v-6 \.9 V -- - 77. -.,—---- .._ _ -' --------m.,.... I —7-7- '' - -- - 77.-/' -- ---'''T.::& ---- - • .4) \--:----------k------i> - 4 ,.,. ,n,i,e,46-?"9 ikv - -c--__-._ •,,- ,t. y r • it I? cfr - -—-- -- -___ -_-_-------- -- - - . \-----• ....,_•_...„.--_--i4,----- • w 7963 °' .au.. fit �.., 7920 r 7970 7966 7989 7934 e.t. 7919 PARK ,; \, 7917 n 7954 7959 7950 7951 7955 7944 7953 7948 7914 6 7913 N©N 7940 7945 �� 7927 HILLVIEW lam 7940 7913 7910 W g m 7930 7933 7930 7917 7940 7945 7934 7931 7930 7909 rots 0 790 ` in in no N n 7901 PARK a n o n n n 7903 79 N1l-V1E� 7900 H N N 7900 7901 N N 7900 1901 N N J I N. N N N N N N 7901 11P® ROAD .D 4O tO O m 00 N Y .Olinaidia map 7891 rii 'o w 7880 7893 NH 7890 79831 N N 7884 786 40 0 5 N N N IA.eae7889 7888 r N N�� Z7x83 7868 7867 7870 7869 7858 78337878 7875 7868 7869 7860OAKW000 0 7877 7854 7851 7860 7885 7852 W 7870 7861 7854p 7857 ela5616 56 7870 H 7863 78427830 78537846 < 7841 _ EtI N 5612 56' 7841 76367847 7840 _7x45 !7851 7830$ 7840 7833 7x40 7829 7833 783278371' ��p 7515 7800 78177820 Q 5.›. 7820 78137790 7809 7814 7827 ` 1 5800 58'p 78057780 7815 7814 p7810< p 78017808 _� 7�75562 55t W 7609 3 7801 7760 7797 7800 7801 76001 5558 551, 7800 7801 7770 w 7751LAJ 7750 77877777 7778 7749 7730 7807 logragg5550 55. 4104 ry���b^ 7767 7760 7741 7740 77677768 nJy 77 7751 WritrThi 5538 55: 44 55- 'Yb 7761. 7750 7731 7730 7753 7748 7729 7730 7741 PIN • CIR 7755 7730 7721 7720 7725 7719 7720 7731 ii®®®tk®� Q F 5532 55; b 7745 7710 7711 7_710 7709 7710 7721 ® N S �myq �pflflP1ri155' rybry 7713 N NN 1 N 7700 N Nl N 7701 7700 7701( N 7701 4 ® 5520 55: • CO RD \ nnnn nn�»g 2551 t9 Nir •N IN N •N N NN N )1 NNNN NNNNN Z 7660Q N 2547 O 7666 7880 7643 7658 cp R_ (ft N254 5 664 r 7641 7658 7861 22539 537 788 , 7610- 7639 7844 7651 7635 7622 7640 p 7635 7630 76•- 7824- • 76 : 7 5 7626 7625 7628 7641 �. �y 7624 C7 7611 7610 . �`111#111 O '1 "� s s s N ctt, W 7395 75y4 7631 s r N N n. N � ry nb ^ ° is n n 7634 7616 7361 7560 7531N-51c4 N �' N`. i 756 7564o s N"N Il ` ry� ryyN Ut n =: 7551 7350 7521 ; t °N n«rt2.OA! ,' y N 0 N .`H` 753573342W N N N N W 7511 N - 13 ro =�«N 0 N , 7321 7510 8 404'C'4".." NNN N .N .«N 'p 7505 7504 7501 N .0. .' O N ID N <"«N "Yi.;4j110"4%� mYg0«" 4 1111111116.1:c CITY HALL e N"N 0«p b O'er N N §D ii . 3394 �� F N N NN N.'N �N.. • ry�1 5373 5 5385 17 • 33 41OrSJ.s533.2 333pm o amQ - 1O4,g1 Qs31WE n NN � ®Q cc S[T3fl AN[7�• a m o N Nrl N0 3299 mrZLN tnN N 11; rei F N H2 - o a 'd7 5278 oomn0I N • F N N A. 5279 iiiirNpN ry143 NNNNNN 5273 27 5272 5280 \\5262 267 (1411 ;1121N1NINI I I$IO 3266 N N m N 0 N ND 'ON N Nm 5256 5261 52565267 Q S�' II 5261 261 LOUISA AVE p 5250 5255 5250 5260 !girlCoN p + 0 tlN2 * op5235G530952 Q n 0 ID 0 sD 0 n o o 0 o o O 5244 5249 5244 Q pp pN NN N N N N NN N N Nce5249 �_����924 6: M a '0 g. NnNNN 'n M $ W p W 5238`5243 5238 5243 � 5290 5299 I 45' 524 'IN N N N N N N N N N N N J 5237 52325 A-VI W AVE M� ��®�� ry CLEARV1EW AVE 0 �< o o .D aD o N ,D 5270 r�T�•. • 923 o N ,D N aD ♦ p g 5231 5226 5231 r .Ni r 3 i i �'�!! 1 :' 2E Hf 2 N N N N N N N N N N 5260 ..4•.. 5231 523 N N N NN N N N N N N 5225^5220 5225 ®EE " 1 ,,,� ,n� _Ilimai i. a n n n 4� h�=1 I I 1 �n n b "� n N Y .r� cn� !I.? ,..271;Y9 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION - FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER DATE: April 9, 1992 SUBJECT: MINOR SUBDIVISION - 8298 KNOLLWOOD DRIVE ARNOLD SCHOLLJEGERDES, PLANNING CASE NO. 345-92 Mr. Arnold Scholljegerdes has made application for a Minor Subdivision for the property located at 8298 Knollwood Drive. The request is subject to Chapter 42 of the Mounds View Municipal Code which outlines the procedures and requirements for subdividing property. Staff has reviewed the request and found it to be in conformance with all requirements of Chapter 42 . City Engineer Ric Minetor will be providing comments and suggestions on the location of utility easements. His remarks will be provided Wednesday evening. 410 If you have any additional questions on this item, please feel free to give me a call. 1 CITY OF-MOUNDSVIEW PLANNING APPLICATION Date 3/ 3A 4 APPLICANT: Name At'� ��CQ cJ1. — ‘---:-_.. :Phone- 6 -ag437 Address ltd OC,o" `L� - , Y Interest in Property (Check Appropriate Bl ank) rr 7C Owner of RecordLessee, Operator, ,Manayer Contractor for Deed Owner Ayreement to Purchase Other (Explain) } - Documentary evidence of applicant' s interest in the property may be required before final ;City action on this, request. PROPERTY: Address/General Location =- 2� wo0( _ Leyal_ Owner: Name/AddressaliA,t4-Q L c )O Q� Rags i ,m. i,00. 0_ Present Use (Check Appropriate Blank) : Undevel ped/Vacant `• -'Apartment - -,--i-•'-';.., . -,_--,::-.- -, - - , . • e Family Dwell i ng _ Business Esbl ishment Dup1 ex Dwell my Industrial Establ ishment ` Multiple Dwell my '(3-6 units) _' ; - Other (expl ai n) - Property Classification .Abstract Torrensl REQUEST (Explain) 1d - A cr-v � SA x.. ` I hereby decl are that the above statements are true. �ir� , . /,-1, .. ..,.,,,,,4 ,.4-7_, { iynatur (s - < - FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: _ ,TOTAL ; 'BASE *(Base Fees are Non Refundable) t :DEPOSIT FEES N y x; L Y � Y Subdivision, Major` $250 ;:($150) . TOTAL EES PAID --,3_j� Q :---. - subdivision , Minor $100 ($75) `:id0•o6 .::,iT!-::- Date Paid. '` s.} -,0o•oo Rezoning $100 Receipt Number �;; , 7 0�9 Conditional 'Use =$100 ($J0) }. g _ Variance $75 • ($50) �r 3 t } Code Appeal $100 ($50) Park ,Fund�Dedicat ion r Alteration Permit �'`$150 ($50) - `Date .Paid Plan Review $100 ($50) Receipt Number - } ($50); Other : _ _ t PLANNING SIGN $ 50 Addt'l -_Fees'Paid ' Date Paid i --;• - - i Receipt .Number -- l 34- �-. �: p 7pou 0,04 0400 -�----- 8470 + - 8465 8464 8465 8458 6457 8 8454 8481 - 8460 8483 8456 8461 8480) 8451 8456 , 8454 84T1- AVE Nr 8455 g4�p 8459 8450 8455 8440 8441 8455 8454 8455 8,µ.F 8441 8442 8449 1 8445 8444 8432 8444 8443 8444 8445 8434 8431 8438 8430 ww 8439 8438 8431 < 8431 8435 8434 8433 8422 8421 8430 842507 8429 8432 8424 8425 8434 8425 8424 8421 0 8423 8426 8400 8420 8425 . 8412 8411 8418 8419 8415 8415 8414 - 8402 0 8401 8419 8419 8420 8392 84x6 8405 8404 8415 8401 8392 8391 8406 6407 8410 8415 8414 8401 8384 8400 8379 8390 8405 m 8389 8390 6389 8394 8403 8408 8409 8408 .3972 m = 78 8384 8395 - 8401 8398 ,. 8379 8380 8373 8386 8387 8391 840 G. :37: 8372 8370 8385 8380 8.391 83658360 8375 8380 8385 8387 8382 8381 8378 7 n n 8.366 8370 w 8371 8.374 8.383 8372 8371 8368 x:369 m 8360 8355 8368 88350. 8355 5 8371 ma 8351 , 8346 8365 8354 8345 8364 8345 8345 8335 8360 I 8.360 Y8359 8.360 8345 6344 8351 8346 8335 8340 8331 8330 8325 'Itp 8351 5,355 • 8347 8358 8341 8343 8342 8325 8312 8315 8320 8315 8340 O 8339 8345 O 8335 8.332 8315 8300 8303 8310 w0 8205 8330 8335 8336 8325 • 0 8.333 8330 8.333 8305 8290 8295 8290 8291 Z 8281 8320 8325 8316 mini- 8.322 O 1 8319 .8285 8280 Y 8287 8280 z 8310 8315 8308 Y v 8275 8270 0 8281 8270 N 8271 8305 8312 97 : . CRO ASR N0 - 8265 8260 8273 8260 8261 ['.89 8250 8255 8250 8267 . 8251 8290 8284 8285 _ :1 8250 n n '� WI n al 8240 18255 8261 8240 w m 1 8280 8275 Y v n 'D ^ r 1 N `O `O N 8270 8230 N N N N NN 8230 N N N Ni 82 8270 a ARDAN 8265 AVE 1 l 8260 aEMI ®� t7 o o N8220nNN NNiNw N N N N NN N 8211 8250 p,1 031 :7 N 8206 8210 8240 PLE• 8233 8228 T 8227 8245 92 8202 N N N N 20C 62 8235 F 1213 8210 8217 8198 8205 N N N N 2�8198 m 8201 8200 8191 8192 Z 8203f n N 8175 OR c �.1� 1 8208 _ 8144 8177 8160 m N N 8200 N i N l N N 8148 8165 °0 �^ -12 8123 6160 8175 8148 1 N LAPORT I n 1 8155 �,a�� • '72: 8119 8160 L O n n ° 0 0 8142 8145 psi 811:3 8158 8161 to 8138 N N N N N 8135 • �i/ 'Ll'.\ 001 8156 8132 812518130 8131 8127 a 8110 !!�� n N 0) p n 0' ,n n N n in N 0, N 2 N ci g n n n n n N IN 812 '•12 N N N N w 8106 N N N NN N N N N N Sr S 8101 8100 N Y 03V030 0 a K1 c4 � Nj 1�BO6081 8080 8075 8. • _ m a - ' N N dNN N NNNN 0 O. 8084 8085 8070 8071 8066 8071 Na 8080 8085 8075 8060 8059 8050 8055 • N 8040 8043 8046 i 8045 6040 8042 8045 c 3 8030 6039 8032 8033 0 T•'r m 8020 18025 8026 8025 8015 - X28 8025 8018 8011 X. N 8016 8016 8009 8006 7890 8005 8000 X7985 8004 7981 7990 0 7981 7990 7980 "7975 7970 y 7979 7980 7969 m + N 7980 7965 7960 0 7959 7970 7965 Z N in O N 7950 7955 7956 ce 7949 7954 7959 Q N 7940 7945 4 m N 4 7933 7950 7930 7933 0_ N 2le -J Q 0 N N N I79OO 7901 7900 N I CO 7920 HILLVIEW 7897 1 IILLY't/► R' `' 7918 7886 N gm N 7830 1 7835 7890 7887 7860 ■o ® 7876 z 7885 '' 7820 - 7825 7880 7879 7860 7870 OEMI 781.J 7815 7870 7865 x1.i 789 O 780 7860 7851 8 7850, 7821kilh7863 III § 7650 — 7841 3TIJ 7600 78017851 N K x OA W004) UR Q ti ~�` 7821 w i 7786 O112 , 7768 n 7769 7780 5 7758 7759 7770 ■ ry10� .ih, tit'�h b^ Shk 1 b 7748 7749 7788 7761 4y ,y i\ 7765 7738 C 7739 7729 Q mmimimm c.7.;'09/ . MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION - , FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER Q� DATE: April 9, 1992 SUBJECT: C.U.P. - 2840 HIGHWAY 10 TC SCHOOL OF PET GROOMING PLANNING CASE NO. 343-92 Mary Bourke, representing Twin City School of Pet Grooming, has been involved in discussions with the current owner of the property they are considering buying/leasing to explore the possibility of acquiring additional property to provide for parking at the site. She will be available Wednesday evening for questions and/or direction on the matter. • MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION : FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER '�' DATE: April 9, 1992 SUBJECT: MAJOR SUBDIVISION LONG LAKE WOODS Jack Halverson of ReMax Results, Inc. and Chris Johnson of Nu Way Development, Inc. have approached the City with a concept plan for the additional development of Long Lake Woods. Specifically, they are interested in the development of what is currently Outlot A of the Long Lake Woods plat. They have requested that this item be placed on the agenda for preliminary discussion. A full application will be forthcoming however, they would like to discuss the proposal prior to submittal • in order to avoid unnecessary delays once the application is put in motion. I have included a plan wh' h was provided by Mr. Halverson and Mr. Johnson for your review Additionally, I have included the applicable section of the Long Lake Woods plat. • 0. • 54� 0 Y! //O .TSL._ • - %,---...., a 34.7 0 �� 1 1 p . = SSsc. r ::,_.:1s Q• 49 • 264 .iii....-...1812. .� A , 5 7) ' _1>s -- :3..62:: ::(l/IZz-, - 't�% 4(72) . . . .� V 1�� i 2 `a3) \ ^` (81). Z M .34u. 1 0 .41 se. ""'s J �38 :. 37) t r _. "`- 35a (.1l13)- y ISS' . (t 1704) £1o.s1. . 70 o c .. 3."%.. +.% a'A x 43.e: :13.,o:. o 9) k ': A•:-61t,-,..;:,::....: '° t/g _• <;:(B2) 2 R i3 4) I� a `(3s ` 9}� 1. J ] ��� f�a `?G >59 - ti1.t+a 'I- • `4 �•' ` "a . 0s :r ;a3 K109tn,a 41 ;> r !(44) s: =1 ` ▪ (68)1.-;'-...r: , n 1 k NI ' %,▪ -..;,. ,„.-ti",:'s;w.i41.;.--••:.rti ij ,.. .) t . _ ..... ...r4-,.,,,,..,,..-c,...35.j:-.., i .... ,r,.;,...„:„... r to ) 4 t 44. . . . . _ , ... , K� Sf 2r► o _ oi,0 3( ) Y ▪ G(67) Q r�1 3 _� ( 31 __ _a � I (.1316) T �� O ,_. .7Sac.• 1Aor : r 3 0 N ��'4 1 0 1 5 (..5 I) r,i GS XL5 5 -x .1216j�-F • c+12AT 13�; F . * RIS) . - 4 • '.4s 200 o J�7. D , ( � 5 . fa • - (2,7)Ct.J (2,6 '�� 7 n 33) „ •.5g.0 �a_t• 3 ' ti `. . M• S(33). 160 3a.o. <.I1•wY7 ' s3 05 lil 8� 1p (S_. , n fr PAGENSKiw- A.01 T1014 '3 2'�J �� (3� Ti; ,� ,S b : 1s.. - ILRf '_ .# ..147s -ql . 105 95 SS` Ilo.G= ; O -.. . . - - r v . 1 0 . 4101 D..•1SE.41OG (7, �w.1444104 : A6LE. R7 1 ><o . azo ,7s T5 -•7e : Ioo.o.`,, )ia ..e1.e5 ,..91.155 91.3 1 •27.e, .r 26�e.: �, . . v o in F • di 33oes ao.. 510+• 40.+ a .4Goc. 9 .34.4.r .3404./.3"6• I. e1 ; `_ -a .: •(2 �;1''0 1. `Q24 .- (x.3) ;:,----,M (3'Z')01 I Cal) . "(39) `ti.(4o) C 4) "' r" 4>Sao s ✓ k) t_�t r Q� ,` 190 a�0 _ {TA� ;;',- ,,,.,,,x zp`, � i`J, ^�- • :. ,° 190 � V Lf4. . 7 1 -' (+•815) ':11:-.,:•,-:.•.±4,,,,'42..8 ' .aro) .b lb - ,a .4i.1_-• •a .IT e.o .: -.', o „ :55 o." o .,•j C--- - 503 ` COLO IT- 1 111 - (4• �oens� • .S7 cue_ Soso 1C ::' - ▪ . . �, 1.�7m. , OUTLOT (��) z 9 (15) . A ?a'.; . t.Go-► s) (40 : 0043,- • - � tllee. 503 . . /rr o4 s 07) �z' _ A'P`KE y . •1.- -: - :. :.- -_. , .,.„..• r�,-_. 524 QNG - Z(6)r iii"`'" 44 • '" `� Q ' (fa),oi� . (19). o a . !o - et. 3(65); r 3co 1 E - � • (*•40 S1a • r ♦ �- O 4870.0. • l t W (.5a0.c. n W (11) .m 2 1• • N W►A 1(1 X37 a Pr '�'«v (43) - (t2a2. 8 (Je�., (f 3) • �2� N 1.13 c.4. o /'` 43 0 ,-47: -►G1t4 u 1^ • i 2Aa� tl4.t'-•;1 .*10L) ('f7); (44)i l'n i 11 +l. O (9 • , w .L9ee. F.Ls...2.bi... $1 30ec.A 6Ie4. a y o �xj. to ss tam• 24 4r�§3 r"�,, opo 4G r":�45}rd ► y 1 �r . 1�_-(rsj°�(H) � ,� � sem*-1 tea}- 9. . 1- , �_.~ Al (415 r i • SIS>5� I.- i , , •1t1! >b..•= bo . by I.91 t••_ so • se, 1 �-/ ; Ica •433 . O. .........:..: :.-- :. ,...: .... --� =�..0zs t;..'°4- sz•ta--4' ROAD F / R.G.G. 3-5-74 SCALE Is2001 •• • . J • MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION ' FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER S"�. DATE: April 9, 1992 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REQUEST - GREENFIELD ESTATES HARSTAD, PLANNING CASE NO. 333-91 All parties involved in the Greenfield Estates development request(Peter Sabee, Barr Engineering; Jeff Roos, McCombs, Frank, Roos Consultants; and City staff) will be present to discuss the proposal. For those of you who were unable to attend the last Planning Commission meeting, I am enclosing a letter I distributed to the Commission from the applicant. • • • • ./—` Nt1/4f c_s-c• L“...ic_-_-_, ‘....o-c- -- 5 )...L...,, —____, • • o .-3 Pci 1-1 Pl1 121 0 • Z•-4- AL i?)rA 0 0m >n Amro . tzi PCDro H ') ,00 d xo � o r t53. 00 Yjrit S _ ri- t t PI rt r 3 z 'Ti z (,.., SLovC=2 �+�e \ �� o_ o 0r, z F3 i-3 'fi L ..�( ,��� CD • PI -< CCD `• < CDD CWI1 n �' r f �x�+^ l/ D >, S -1 Z V ,c m . z ;c m z ;c m - o - , ti rr rt. t-i �p r 1cc >P. r 0 Yt � o m ` ( H to H Utiii6` (/ F) k - K k _ F, k r) cs-, cy 0- d rtC• rt < . A $ t 4- 2 rct z - O ,�/ _ O P. O P. t7 -�Yi �1 + ° �i ...,t_pi . �•-ro •� '� v CD Oprt CCD O Rt O 0t I; �� 3 0 OD 18CJ c7 • �° :o Nr r° 0 ,„,<._._._._...N..-..._,„.. ; V V N k F"C �Z.Z eZn 410N• N N `� v � G • t s 0 -n J - lQ - - I-21 CJ CD t• ri (Dtritri tD VI E--� ♦A O cD e� X -n ti SZ .t 10.4 V! ON I rt rt �r+ rt . y . . 1jc Z 12.ED r 6 a n .1, x 411c") V • • ° m i . t.., , v r/ 6 0 hoc rn 74 £ (1) a)N• . . . .y�t2 y n i� a ; ` _ ...... En i, ' 'I m v m f+t rt r+ rt 6. = z < H, H, c ti rri Z C ~ • O Z N m n .? ~ ~ 1 , -•� _ 3r;►f ©amu • r r r 1 ��O - .O _-r J ('i , - --r s‘O -\CT"" ` N .( Ti O.10 _....L____-----------------------. 4 K OLL\NO O DRt \ E coo' iz-i `'` .1 - . —.. -f_-_-k